Hook: 50 Provincial Transit Funding Unifies Rural
Grey County · Committee · April 17, 2026
One-sentence summary: At the April 17, 2026 meeting at 2:00 PM, the committee will scrutinize digital-first voting barriers and proposed waterfront monuments to ensure public wealth stays rooted in local autonomy.
The agenda's most newsworthy items include b. 2026 West Grey Election Accessibility Report (Jamie Eckenswiller - West Grey) That in consideration of staff report ‘2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan’, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Committee receives the report for review and comment. (Subsections):; c. Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines Presentation (Jacklyn Iezzi and Sabine Robart - City of Owen Sound) (Subsections):; d. CR-26-018 - City of Owen Sound 2026 Municipal Election Plan (Briana Bloomfield and Kristen Van Alphen - City of Owen Sound) That in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-018 respecting the Accessibility Plan for the 2026 Municipal Election, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purposes. (Subsections):; e. CS-26-024 – Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design (Pam Coulter - City of Owen Sound) That in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-024 respecting the (Subsections):.
Unifying the Wheels: A 50% Funding Model for Inter-County Transit Savanna Myers, Director of Economic Development Tourism and Culture, will present a groundbreaking proposal to merge public transit across Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, and Wellington counties. The plan leverages Operational and Transit Infrastructure Fund (OTIF) financing to operate a unified network for up to four years, with the province contributing an average of 50% of the costs. This "unification" strategy aims to bridge rural mobility gaps, but it raises immediate distributist questions: Who controls the routes? Can this funding model sustain local autonomy, or does it cede critical infrastructure planning to a broader provincial consortium? The committee will assess feasibility before the recommendation moves to final council approval.
The Digital Divide and Election Equity in West Grey On October 26, 2026, the West Grey election is set to undergo a drastic transformation under a draft accessibility plan presented by Jamie Eckenswiller. The proposal shifts voting mechanisms significantly toward internet and telephone methods via "Simply Voting." While staff training and physical accessibility at Election Centres (located at the West Grey Municipal Office and Neustadt Community Centre) are planned, critics may question whether digital-first voting truly enhances equity or creates a new barrier for the elderly and unconnected. Specific operating hours for these centres will be scrutinized to ensure dignity is maintained during the transition to remote voting technologies.
River District Dining: Managing the Sidewalk Economy Following an initial review on April 2, 2026, the committee will advance new Sidewalk Patio Guidelines to City Council. These regulations target outdoor dining in the River District, a hub for local commerce. The tension between maximizing street-level vibrancy and maintaining accessibility for pedestrians creates a unique friction point for local businesses and residents alike. The guidelines seek to formalize the relationship between private enterprise (restaurants) and public space (sidewalks), a classic distributist battleground where profit meets public welfare.
The Contested Memorial: A Design Clash in the Forest The meeting will receive a report for information regarding the "Commemorative Forest Monument." Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services, will outline the proposed design for this permanent fixture. While presented for information, the sheer scale and symbolic weight of the monument suggest it will spark intense debate on resource allocation. Is a public forest suitable for a monument, or should funds be directed toward community housing and operational grants? The design choices here will signal how Grey County values its history versus its immediate social needs.
Owen Sound's Election Accessibility: A City-Level Precedent Simultaneously, the committee will review the City of Owen Sound's 2026 Municipal Election Plan, presented by Briana Bloomfield and Kristen Van Alphen. With voting moving toward digital and telephone interfaces, the city's approach mirrors West Grey's strategy. The juxtaposition of these two municipalities—Grey County and City of Owen Sound—provides a comparative lens on how rural and urban areas navigate the same digital voting challenges, potentially revealing disparities in technological infrastructure availability.
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
This page is an accessibility-focused summary and extracted agenda text intended to promote civic accessibility.
It is an unofficial convenience copy and may contain extraction or summarization errors.
For the authoritative record, try to access the original source materials from Grey County using the original link below.
A proposed unified transit network aims to merge routes across Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, and Wellington Counties, shifting from isolated operations to a single, efficient system. The plan leverages existing SMART buses, expands service into Dufferin, and converts part-time drivers to full-time roles without buying new vehicles, effectively utilizing spare capacity to reduce empty trips. By integrating private taxi and rideshare providers into one app and linking local services like Meaford Moves and Colltrans, the initiative seeks to lower costs and simplify connections to GO Transit via shared fares and extended layovers. Funded partially by OTIF grants, the project targets equitable, affordable travel that strengthens regional advocacy for higher-level government support while ensuring seamless access to economic hubs.
Page 3 of 126 Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Regional Transit Review Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Meeting April 1, 2026 Page 3 of 126 Page 4 of 126 Study Purpose Study Purpose: To design and assess the feasibility of a unified transit network across Bruce, Dufferin, Grey and Wellington Counties Key Partners: Bruce, Dufferin, Grey and Wellington Counties, together with Saugeen Mobility and Regional Transit (SMART) Phase 2 Operating Funding: Funding provided through OTIF to operate the recommended unified network for up to four years (average 50% contribution) Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 4 of 126 2 Page 5 of 126 Why Unify Transit? • Make travel easier for riders by simplifying things like: • • • • Booking and planning trips Reducing the number of transfers needed Understanding who can use specialized transit Keeping fares consistent • Helps partners work together to use resources more efficiently • Strengthens the region’s ability to advocated for funding form higher levels of government. Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 5 of 126 Page 6 of 126 Study Schedule October 2025 October 2025 to January 2026 January to March 2026 We are here Project Start Background Review and Round 1 Engagement May 2026 April 2026 Presentations to Council Revise Plan Based On Comments Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 6 of 126 Developing Draft Plan March to April 2026 Round 2 Engagement – Feedback on Early Findings and Draft Plan Page 7 of 126 Vision and Guiding Principles Vision: Connecting Communities. Building a better future through a seamless, multi-modal transit network. Equitable, Accessible and Affordable Customer Driven: Seamless, Connected and Easy to Use Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Support Growth & Economic Development Page 7 of 126 Innovative & Forward Thinking Fiscally Responsible Page 8 of 126 Conceptual Inter-Community Corridor Options • Connects communities to important places through key travel corridors • Buses should run at least 3-4 times a day on weekdays to be useful • Saturday service can help with shopping, leisure trips, and visitors • Shorter commuter routes may need more frequent service • Travel is smooth and uninterrupted across municipal boundaries Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 8 of 126 Page 9 of 126 Contract On-Demand Service to SMART • Expand service area into Dufferin County so riders can use both specialized and on-demand trips to connect to regional routes and Orangeville Transit • Look at whether Dufferin County Community Support Services could help provide similar services • Allow more people to use the service to reduce empty vehicle travel and increase trips per hour • Change part-time drivers to full-time – no new vehicles needed • Put existing unused vehicles back into service, with some investment Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 9 of 126 Page 10 of 126 Integration with the Private Sector • Update taxi and rideshare rules across all four counties so more private providers can operate • Explore an app that lets riders book trips with private and community transportation to connect to regional routes • Consider lowering fares on regional transit when riders use on-demand services to connect • Work with private bus companies so all trips appear in one app and look at offering fare subsidies for trips within the four counties • Choose a technology provider to support the on-demand service Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 10 of 126 Page 11 of 126 Integration with Local Transit, GO Transit and Community Care • Coordinate schedules so local transit systems connect smoothly at terminals • Make better use of Ride Well to link riders to the inter-community routes • Look at using Dufferin County Community Support Services to help connect riders to regional routes • Explore integration with Meaford Moves and specialized transit in Owen Sound and The Blue Mountains • Connect with Colltrans (Collingwood) and Simcoe LINX • Ensure all routes appear on Google Maps and other trip-planning tools • Provide longer layovers at GO Train/Bus stops to support connections in Orangeville and Guelph • Work with Metrolinx to join the OneFare program when available Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 11 of 126 Page 12 of 126 Summary of Opportunities • Build a main transit network along the busiest travel corridors • Expand SMART service into areas that don’t currently have it • Look at partnering with Community Support organizations, including in Dufferin County • Use SMART’s extra capacity to help connect riders to key routes (with the possibility of shared fares) • Allow private transportation providers to operate so riders have more choices • Consider offering a fare subsidy when private carriers duplicate or connect to regional routes • Track ridership to decide when and where new corridors may be needed • Apply for more OTIF funding for Wellington County • Work with Metrolinx on joining the OneFare program to make connections to GO Transit easier Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 12 of 126 Page 13 of 126 Next Steps Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 13 of 126 Page 14 of 126 Input, Comments & Community Perspective Thank You Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington Unified Transit Study – Preliminary Options Page 14 of 126
The Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee is asked to review Jamie Eckenswiller's draft accessibility plan for the West Grey election held on October 26, 2026, which shifts voting to internet and telephone methods via Simply Voting to enhance equity while maintaining dignity through staff training and physical accessibility at Election Centres located at the West Grey Municipal Office and Neustadt Community Centre with specific operating hours.
West Grey utilizes internet and telephone voting to enhance accessibility, allowing residents to cast ballots from any location using personal assistive technologies during the October 26 election.
West Grey integrates mandatory disability service training into election staff duties while ensuring the 2026 budget covers all accessibility measures without requiring additional funds.
Candidates with disabilities will have expenses directly related to their condition excluded from permitted spending limits for the 2026 municipal election.
Page 15 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Jamie Eckenswiller, Director of Legislative Services/Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Subject: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Recommendations: THAT in consideration of staff report ‘2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan’, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Committee receives the report for review and comment. Highlights: • • • • The 2026 Municipal and School Board Election will be held on October 26, 2026. West Grey will be using internet at telephone voting as the voting method for the 2026 Municipal and School Board Election. West Grey is seeking feedback from the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee to finalize the draft plan. The Municipal and School Board Election will be held in accordance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Previous Report/Authority: 2025-12-02 Staff Report: 2026 Election Report No. 1 2026-01-13 Staff Report: 2026 Election Report No. 2 Analysis: The 2026 municipal and school board election, being held on Monday, October 26, 2026, is being planned and delivered with a strong commitment to accessibility and inclusion. Through the use of accessible voting methods, in-person supports, staff training, and proactive communication, election administrators aim to ensure that all Staff Report: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Page 1 of 5 Page 15 of 126 Page 16 of 126 eligible electors and candidates are able to participate fully and equitably in the democratic process. The purpose of this report is to highlight the measures that will be undertaken to identify, remove, and prevent barriers to participation in the 2026 municipal and school board elections for electors and candidates with disabilities. This report is presented to the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee for review and input and reflects an ongoing commitment to accessibility, inclusion, and equitable participation in the democratic process. The 2026 municipal and school board elections will be conducted in accordance with the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. Section 12.1 of the Act requires that the Clerk have regard to the needs of electors and candidates with disabilities and that an accessibility plan be prepared and made available to the public prior to voting day in a regular election. The election will also be administered in compliance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA), including the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation. In addition, applicable municipal accessibility policies and multi-year accessibility plans will inform election planning and service delivery. The Clerk is responsible for ensuring that election services are provided in a manner that respects the principles of dignity, independence, integration, and equal opportunity for persons with disabilities. Overview of the 2026 Municipal and School Board Election The 2026 municipal and school board election will be held on Monday, October 26, 2026. Voting will open on Friday, October 16, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. and will close on voting day at 8:00 p.m. The election will be conducted using internet and telephone voting, administered by Simply Voting. These voting methods are intended to enhance accessibility by allowing electors to cast their ballot from a location of their choice and, where required, to use personal assistive technologies or supports. Election Centres and In-Person Supports Although voting will be conducted electronically, in-person Election Centres will be available throughout the voting period to support electors who require assistance. These centres will provide help to individuals who experience difficulty accessing or navigating the voting system, who need to update or confirm their voter information, or who prefer in-person support due to accessibility, digital literacy, or other considerations. Based on the information contained in 2026 Election Report No. 2, Election Centres will operate at the West Grey Municipal Office and the Neustadt Community Centre on specified days during the voting period. The West Grey Municipal Office will be open on Staff Report: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Page 2 of 5 Page 16 of 126 Page 17 of 126 Friday, October 16, 2026, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., during regular weekday hours from Monday, October 19 to Friday, October 23, on Saturday, October 24, and again on voting day, Monday, October 26, 2026, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The Neustadt Community Centre will operate as an Election Centre on Saturday, October 17, 2026, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. In addition to these locations, election staff will attend institutions and retirement homes throughout the voting period, where permitted, in order to provide voting assistance and ensure equitable access for residents who may otherwise face barriers to participation. All Election Centres have been reviewed to confirm that they are physically accessible. This review included consideration of barrier-free entrances, accessible parking available, clear and readable signage, and sufficient interior space to accommodate mobility devices. Accessible Voting Methods The use of internet and telephone voting for the 2026 election supports accessibility by offering multiple methods through which electors may cast their ballot. The Simply Voting platform is compatible with screen readers and adaptive technologies and allows electors to adjust font size and screen display settings. The telephone voting option provides an alternative for individuals who cannot or prefer not to vote online, and the system allows electors to vote independently and privately. Throughout the voting period, election staff will be available to assist electors who experience difficulties accessing the voting system or who require additional support. Electors attending an Election Centre may choose to vote independently, request assistance from election staff, or be accompanied by a support person of their choice. Any assistance provided will be delivered in accordance with the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, while maintaining voter privacy, dignity, and independence. Communication and Information Accessibility Election-related information will be communicated using clear and plain language and will be made available through multiple channels, including municipal election websites, social media platforms, media releases, public notices, and direct communication at Election Centres. Upon request, accommodations will be made to provide information in accessible formats or with appropriate communication supports, in compliance with AODA requirements. These accommodations are intended to ensure that all electors and candidates are able to access election information in a manner that meets their individual needs. Staff Report: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Page 3 of 5 Page 17 of 126 Page 18 of 126 Training of Election Staff All election staff will receive training that addresses legislative accessibility requirements, accessible customer service principles, and appropriate methods for assisting electors with disabilities. Training will also cover the use of accessible voting tools and technologies, as well as procedures for providing assistance while preserving voter privacy and dignity. This training is intended to promote consistent, respectful, and effective service delivery across all election-related interactions. Feedback and Continuous Improvement Feedback from electors, candidates, election staff, and the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee will be used to identify barriers that may be identified during the election and to evaluate the effectiveness of accessibility measures. This feedback will inform continuous improvement efforts and future municipal election planning. Opportunities for feedback will include direct communication with the Clerk’s office and post-election review processes. Financial and Operational Implications: Accessibility measures for the 2026 municipal and school board election are incorporated into the approved election budget. No additional financial implications are anticipated as a result of the implementation of this accessibility plan. Climate and Environmental Implications: There are no climate or environmental implications associated with this report. Communication Plan: The election accessibility plan will be posted on the West Grey election webpage for public use. Consultation: None. Attachments: Draft Election Accessibility Plan Recommended by: Jamie Eckenswiller, AOMC, AMP Director of Legislative Services/Clerk Staff Report: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Page 4 of 5 Page 18 of 126 Page 19 of 126 Submission approved by: Michele Harris, Chief Administrative Officer For more information on this report, please contact Jamie Eckenswiller, Director of Legislative Services/Clerk at clerk@westgrey.com or 519-369-2200 Ext. 229. Staff Report: 2026 Municipal and School Board Election – Accessibility Plan Page 5 of 5 Page 19 of 126 Page 20 of 126 Municipality of West Grey Election Accessibility Plan 2026 This plan is for use in the 2026 Municipal Election in conjunction with West Grey’s current Accessibility Plans and the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation. Page 20 of 126 Page 21 of 126 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 2. Staff Training ......................................................................................................... 3 3. Provision of Election Information ........................................................................... 4 4. Notice of Temporary Service Disruption ................................................................. 4 5. Staff Assistance .................................................................................................... 4 6. Assistance to Electors ........................................................................................... 4 7. Election Centres.................................................................................................... 5 7.1 Parking .......................................................................................................... 5 7.2 Entrance ........................................................................................................ 5 7.3 Interior ........................................................................................................... 5 7.4 Accessible Voting Booth ................................................................................. 5 7.5 Elevator Access.............................................................................................. 5 7.6 Voting Assistance ........................................................................................... 5 7.7 Accessible Voting Technologies ...................................................................... 6 8. Internet Voting and Telephone Voting ..................................................................... 6 9. Assistance to Candidates ...................................................................................... 6 9.1 General Information........................................................................................ 6 9.2 Campaign Expenses ...................................................................................... 7 10. Feedback .......................................................................................................... 7 11. Additional Information ........................................................................................ 7 Page 21 of 126 Page 22 of 126 1. Introduction The Clerk is responsible for the appropriate legislative and administrative conduct of the municipal elections in the Municipality of West Grey. The Municipal Elections Act (MEA), Section 12.1 (1) places responsibility on the Clerk to have regard to the needs of the electors and candidates with disabilities. Section 12.1 (2) of the MEA requires that the Clerk shall prepare a plan regarding the identification, removal, and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities and shall make the plan available to the public before voting day in a regular election. West Grey municipal elections will be conducted in a manner that shall ensure that candidates and electors with disabilities have full and equal access to all election information and services, including Election Centres. The election will be conducted in a manner that ensures that persons with disabilities are able to vote independently and privately with access to voting assistance if required. Section 12.1 (3) of the MEA requires that within (90) days of voting day the Clerk who is responsible for conducting the election shall prepare a report about the identification, removal, and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities, and shall make the report available to the public. 2. Staff Training All staff carrying out election duties will complete the West Grey Accessible Customer Service Training and specific Election Training to recognize and ensure that persons with disabilities are serviced in a way that accommodates their individual needs. Training will include: • • • • • how to interact/communicate with persons with various types of disabilities; how to interact with persons with disabilities who use assistive devices and/or require the assistance of a support person or a service animal; how to clearly explain internet and telephone voting; what to do if a person is having difficulty accessing election information or services; and how to provide voter assistance if requested. Page 22 of 126 Page 23 of 126 3. Provision of Election Information Election information will be provided to electors and candidates with disabilities in an alternative format, agreed upon between the requester and the Clerk. Notice of the provision of information in an alternative format will be provided on the Municipality of West Grey’s election website, www.westgreyvotes.com, and included in election notices posted on the website and in the local media. 4. Notice of Temporary Service Disruption The Clerk shall provide public notice on the Municipality’s election website, www.westgreyvotes.com, and in the local media if there is a temporary disruption in the delivery of election information or services. The notice shall include the reason for the disruption, the expected duration, and an explanation of alternative methods of delivering the information or service. Every effort shall be made to provide alternative methods of providing the information or service to persons with disabilities. 5. Staff Assistance Clerk’s Office staff are available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. Contact information for assistance: Telephone: 519-369-2200 x 229 Email: elections@westgrey.com Municipal Office (In Person or Mail): 402813 Grey Road 4, Durham, ON, N0G 1R0 6. Assistance to Electors The 2026 West Grey municipal elections will be conducted with internet and telephone voting methods. Detailed information about each voting method is set out in the 2026 Municipal Elections Procedures, available on the Municipality’s election website, www.westgreyvotes.com, or from the Clerk’s Office and can be provided in an alternative format upon request. Please contact the Clerk’s Office at 519-369-2200 ext. 229 or elections@westgrey.com if you require your Voter Information Letter in an accessible format. Page 23 of 126 Page 24 of 126 Clerk’s Office staff are available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. 7. Election Centres Election Centres located in the municipality will be available to voters throughout the voting period and on voting day until 8:00 p.m. The locations, accessible parking, and entrance information will be posted on the municipal elections website www.westgreyvotes.com. 7.1 Parking Election Centres will be located in buildings that have designated parking that is clearly identified and located close to the entrance of the Election Centre for individuals with disabilities. 7.2 Entrance The entrances to Election Centres will be level or have steps and ramps with handrails leading to the entrance doors. Doors will have automatic door opening devices or will be propped open in a safe manner. The doors will be wide enough to accommodate a wheelchair or other mobility devices. 7.3 Interior Access to the interior voting area and voting booth will be level. Carpeting and doormats will be level with the floor. The voting area will be well lit, and seating shall be made available. 7.4 Accessible Voting Booth The voting booth will have a wide area to allow individuals using mobility aids to vote independently and secretly. In the voting booth there will be a touchscreen tablet on a stand. The tilt of the touchscreen is adjustable. Election staff and a mobile tablet shall be available for use at long-term care facilities. 7.5 Elevator Access At any location where an Election Centre is not located on the main floor, an accessible elevator will be available. 7.6 Voting Assistance Persons with disabilities may be accompanied by a support person within the voting booth area or the Election Centre staff can assist a voter in casting their vote. The Election Centre staff will, in conjunction with the person with the Page 24 of 126 Page 25 of 126 disability, determine the extent to which they need assistance and the best way to provide the assistance. If public health guidelines and the facilities allow access, election staff will be onsite at retirement homes and long-term care homes at various times in the voting period to increase accessibility. All election officials are sworn to an oath of secrecy. 7.7 Accessible Voting Technologies Voting booths will have a touch screen tablet for internet voting that will assist voters with disabilities in casting their votes with independence and privacy. Election staff will be available at all times at the Election Centre to assist voters upon request. Support persons and service animals shall be accommodated. 8. Internet Voting and Telephone Voting Both internet voting and telephone voting offer persons with a variety of disabilities an opportunity to cast their vote with independence and privacy. Internet voting allows voters to vote from their home through secured internet services. Voters have the option to use the assistive tools they have on their own computer such as paddles, a hand-held touchpad, a thumb switch, or sip and puff technology. Telephone voting allows voters to vote from their home through secured telephone services. Landlines or cell phones can be used to vote. This method is compatible with assistive devices. Both methods are designed to encourage voter participation as voters are not required to attend a physical location to cast their ballot; thus, accessibility and privacy for persons with disabilities is maximized. 9. Assistance to Candidates 9.1 General Information The 2026 West Grey municipal elections will be conducted with internet and telephone voting methods. Detailed information about each voting method is set out in the 2026 Municipal Election Procedures, available on the Municipality’s election website, www.westgreyvotes.com, or from the Clerk’s Office, and can be provided in an alternative format upon request. Page 25 of 126 Page 26 of 126 Clerk’s Office staff are available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. Accessibility measures for candidates to consider in regard to their campaign messaging are included in the candidate package. 9.2 Campaign Expenses Expenses that are incurred by a candidate with a disability that are directly related to the disability and would not have been incurred but for the election to which the expenses relate, are excluded from the permitted spending limit for the candidate. 10. Feedback The West Grey Municipal Clerk welcomes feedback to identify areas where changes need to be considered and ways in which the Municipality of West Grey can improve the delivery of an accessible election. This plan is a living document and will continue to undergo changes when necessary. Feedback on this plan can be submitted through the following: Telephone: 519-369-2200 x 229 Email: elections@westgrey.com Municipal Office (In Person or Mail): 402813 Grey Road 4, Durham, ON, N0G 1R0 11. Additional Information Clerk’s Office staff are available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. Municipality of West Grey Accessibility Webpage www.westgrey.com/accessibility West Grey Election Website www.westgreyvotes.com Page 26 of 126
On April 2, 2026, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee reviewed upcoming Sidewalk Patio Guidelines designed to manage outdoor dining within the River District, which will formally advance to City Council for a final by-law recommendation on April 27, 2026.
The City of Owen Sound presents updated 2026 guidelines permitting frontage and curbside patios within the River District to maintain downtown attraction for locals and tourists. These rules enhance universal accessibility and street experience while managing patios in the right-of-way using Ontario Traffic Council best practices introduced in spring 2022 to ensure public safety and a warm ambiance for the area.
City Council will consider a final bylaw by April 27, 2026, that mandates roadside barriers and specific fencing for new curb lane patios to ensure accessibility.
Page 27 of 126 Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio Guidelines Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Page 27 of 126 April 2, 2026 Page 28 of 126 Introduction & Background • The accommodation of uses such as restaurants, patios, and entertainment facilities within the River District (downtown) is supported by the policies of the City’s Official Plan, to maintain the attraction of the area to locals and tourists. • The River District Action Plan calls for the continued implementation of a policy that encourages sidewalk cafes and patio dining to increase approachability and create a warm ambiance of the River District. Page 28 of 126 2 Page 29 of 126 Committee Resolution At its meeting on September 15, 2021, Community Services Committee adopted the following Resolution (CS-210915-007), which City Council subsequently adopted on September 27, 2021, through adoption of the meeting minutes (Resolution No. R-210927-013): "THAT the Community Services Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to: 1. Bring forward a report to a future Community Services Committee meeting respecting the potential of facilitating sidewalk patios through the Community Improvement Plan; and, 2. Undertake a review of the Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio Design Guidelines." Page 29 of 126 3 Page 30 of 126 Ontario Traffic Council Guidelines • Introduced in Spring of 2022. • Developed by experts in the transportation industry and are considered to be the best practices for managing restaurant patios within the right-of-way. • The updated Sidewalk Patio Guidelines generally implement the OTC guidance. Page 30 of 126 4 Page 31 of 126 Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio Guidelines Page 31 of 126 5 Page 32 of 126 Purpose & Application • The purpose of the Sidewalk Patio Guidelines is to ensure that universal accessibility, public safety, and the streetscape experience are enhanced and not negatively impacted by the introduction of a patio within the City’s right-of-way. • The Guidelines apply city-wide however, patios are only permitted where the Zoning By-law would permit a commercial use and there is area within the Municipal right-of-way that can meet the requirements of the Guidelines. Page 32 of 126 Page 33 of 126 Right-of-way Right-of-way Road On-street parking Sidewalk Utility/ street furniture Page 33 of 126 7 Page 34 of 126 Design Guidelines Page 34 of 126 8 Page 35 of 126 Types of Patios Permitted Page 35 of 126 9 Page 36 of 126 Frontage Patio A patio located immediately adjacent to the building but extending beyond the front property line into the public rightof-way (sidewalk). Page 36 of 126 10 Page 37 of 126 Curbside Patio A patio located on the exterior edge of the sidewalk, adjacent to the curb, with an accessible pedestrian route provided between the building and the patio. Between the boundary of the patio and the curb, a minimum buffer of 0.5 metres is required. Page 37 of 126 11 Page 38 of 126 Curb Lane Patio A patio located within a maximum of two (2) on-street parking spaces or a curb lane. A Curb Lane Patio is only permitted on roadways with: • A speed limit of 50 km/h or less • No more than 2 lanes of traffic (1 lane in each direction or 2 lanes in the same direction). • On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes. Page 38 of 126 12 Page 39 of 126 Frontage Patio with Pedestrian Clearway Not recommended for implementation within the City’s Sidewalk Patio Guidelines Page 39 of 126 13 Page 40 of 126 Accessible Route • Patio layouts are required to provide for a sufficient Accessible Route on the sidewalk for pedestrians. • AODA requires the Accessible Route to be 1.5 m. • OTC Guidelines and other municipalities require 1.8 m. • No portion of a patio including, but not limited to, furniture, umbrellas and plantings, are permitted to encroach onto the Accessible Route. Page 40 of 126 14 Page 41 of 126 Platforms • A Curb Lane Patio requires the installation of a platform to bring the patio surface at grade with the sidewalk, with minimal gaps between surfaces. Page 41 of 126 15 Page 42 of 126 Roadside Barriers Where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed, roadside barriers are required to be provided and installed in the City road allowance at the expense of the Patio Operator. Page 42 of 126 16 Page 43 of 126 Roadside Barrier Options Page 43 of 126 17 Page 44 of 126 Fencing • Guidelines generally serve to limit the use of fencing for smaller frontage and curbside patios to reduce visual clutter. Tactile tape is required to delineate the patio area. • Curb Lane Patios are required to have fencing. • Minimum height of 0.9 metres and maximum height of 1.2 metres. • Provide for an open, unobstructed entrance from the sidewalk of 1.2 metres. • Be constructed of aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or other solid material. The use of dark or neutral colours is preferred. • Chain-link, plastic, or vinyl fencing is prohibited. Page 44 of 126 18 Page 45 of 126 Tactile Tape Page 45 of 126 19 Page 46 of 126 Process to Date Date Step March 11, 2026 Consultation with River District Board of Management March 18, 2026 Report to Community Services Committee April 2, 2026 Consultation with Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Page 46 of 126 20 Page 47 of 126 Next Steps Date Step April 27, 2026 Recommendation Report and final Sidewalk Patio By-law to City Council. Page 47 of 126 21 Page 48 of 126 Comments/Questions Page 48 of 126 22
Owen Sound is revolutionizing its 2026 municipal election by shifting from traditional in-person-only voting to a model centered on internet and telephone ballots. This drastic change aims to dismantle physical barriers, allowing voters with disabilities to utilize their own assistive technologies, such as sip-and-puff devices or thumb switches, directly from home. Instead of forcing citizens to travel to distant polling stations, the city will dispatch mobile tablet equipment specifically to retirement homes and long-term care facilities, provided health guidelines permit. The few remaining in-person locations, including City Hall and the Heritage Place Mall, are being retrofitted with automatic doors, level entrances, adjustable screens, and wheelchair-accessible booths. Crucially, new staff training mandates that election workers recognize and accommodate various disabilities rather than relying on generic services, ensuring voters can cast secret ballots privately without needing non-disabled support persons unless they choose otherwise. The city treats accessibility as a living document, soliciting continuous public feedback to refine these measures. By centralizing physical voting to just two sites and prioritizing digital independence, Owen Sound seeks to streamline access while respecting the dignity and privacy of all residents in a system built on distributive equity where voting technology is provided universally to bridge social gaps.
The City will deploy Internet and telephone voting for the 2026 election while providing iPads at Election Centre kiosks to ensure disabled electors and candidates receive equal access.
The City of Owen Sound will conduct internet and telephone voting to maximize independence and privacy for persons with disabilities, allowing them to cast ballots from home without attending a physical location.
Page 49 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-018 Subject: 2026 Municipal Election – Accessibility Plan Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-018 respecting the Accessibility Plan for the 2026 Municipal Election, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purposes. Highlights: • • • • The next municipal election will be held on Monday, October 26, 2026, with voting taking place from October 16-26, 2026. Internet and telephone voting will be the method used for the 2026 municipal election. Feedback from this committee will be used to finalize the Accessibility Plan. The 2026 municipal election will be held in accordance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: Municipal Elections Act, 1996 Staff Report CR-26-018: 2026 Municipal Election – Accessibility Plan Page 1 of 4 Page 49 of 126 Page 50 of 126 Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Background: The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 (the “Act”), subsection 12.1 (1) places responsibility on the clerk to have regard to the needs of electors and candidates with disabilities. Subsection 12.1 (2) of the Act requires that the clerk prepare a plan regarding the identification, removal, and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities and shall make the plan available to the public before voting day in a regular election. Analysis and Options: The draft Accessibility Plan is attached to the report and is being presented to the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee to review and provide feedback. The City Clerk will use the feedback to finalize the Accessibility Plan. The draft Accessibility Plan references Election Centres throughout the municipality. For the 2026 municipal election, there will be two Election Centre locations as noted in the chart below. Based on feedback from the 2018 and 2022 municipal elections, this streamlined approach improves communication with voters about where they can access assistance with election questions and voting. Location City Hall Heritage Place Mall Day(s) Date(s) Times Friday October 16 12pm to 4pm Monday to Friday October 19-23 12pm to 4pm Monday October 26 12pm to 8pm Saturday/Sunday October 17/18 12pm to 4pm Saturday/Sunday October 24/25 12pm to 4pm Monday October 26 12pm to 8pm Staff will also be attending institutions and retirement homes throughout the voting period, provided that public health guidelines and the facilities permit access. Staff Report CR-26-018: 2026 Municipal Election – Accessibility Plan Page 2 of 4 Page 50 of 126 Page 51 of 126 Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The City has approved a budget for the 2026 municipal election. Human Resources Election staff will be hired to work at Election Centres. All election staff will complete the Owen Sound Accessible Customer Service Training and specific election training to recognize and ensure that persons with disabilities are serviced in a way that accommodates their individual needs. Time and Scheduling The City Clerk is responsible for ensuring that all election timelines are met, including the completion of the Accessibility Plan. Technology and Infrastructure The Election Centres will have iPads at voting kiosks. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: The Accessibility Plan will be posted on the City’s website. The plan has been prepared well in advance of the election so that it can be shared with candidates and election staff. Report Developed in Consultation With: Manager of Legislative Services, Deputy Clerk Attachments: Draft 2026 Election Accessibility Plan Reviewed by: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Staff Report CR-26-018: 2026 Municipal Election – Accessibility Plan Page 3 of 4 Page 51 of 126 Page 52 of 126 Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk at bbloomfield@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1247. Staff Report CR-26-018: 2026 Municipal Election – Accessibility Plan Page 4 of 4 Page 52 of 126 Page 53 of 126 City of Owen Sound Election Accessibility Plan 2026 Municipal Election This Plan is for use in the 2026 Municipal Election in conjunction with the City’s current Accessibility Plans and the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation. Page 53 of 126 Page 54 of 126 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 3 2. Staff Training .................................................................................... 3 3. Provision of Election Information ........................................... 4 4. Notice of Temporary Service Disruption .................................. 4 5. Staff Assistance .................................................................. 4 6. Assistance to Electors .......................................................... 4 7. Election Centres .................................................................. 5 Parking ............................................................................. 5 Entrance ........................................................................... 5 Interior ............................................................................. 5 Accessible Voting Booth....................................................... 5 Elevator Access .................................................................. 5 Voting Assistance ............................................................... 5 8. Internet Voting and Telephone Voting .................................... 6 9. Assistance to Candidates ...................................................... 6 10. Feedback ........................................................................... 7 11. Additional Information ......................................................... 7 2 Page 54 of 126 Page 55 of 126 1. Introduction The City Clerk is responsible for the appropriate legislative and administrative conduct of the municipal elections in the City of Owen Sound. The Municipal Elections Act (“MEA”), subsection 12.1 (1) places responsibility on the clerk to have regard to the needs of the electors and candidates with disabilities. Subsection 12.1 (2) of the MEA requires that the clerk prepare a plan regarding the identification, removal and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities and make the plan available to the public before voting day in a regular election. Owen Sound municipal elections will be conducted in a manner that ensures candidates and electors with disabilities have full and equal access to all election information and services, including Election Centres. The election will be conducted in a manner that ensures that persons with disabilities are able to vote independently and privately with access to voting assistance if required. Subsection 12.1 (3) of the MEA requires that within (90) days of voting day the clerk who is responsible for conducting the election shall submit a report to Council regarding the identification, removal, and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities. 2. Staff Training All staff carrying out election duties will complete the Owen Sound Accessible Customer Service Training and specific Election Training to recognize and ensure that persons with disabilities are serviced in a way that accommodates their individual needs. Training will include: • • • • • how to interact/communicate with persons with various types of disabilities; how to interact with persons with disabilities who use assistive devices, or require the assistance of a support person or a service animal; how to clearly explain internet and telephone voting; what to do if a person is having difficulty accessing election information or services; and how to provide voter assistance if requested. 3 Page 55 of 126 Page 56 of 126 3. Provision of Election Information Election information will be provided to electors and candidates with disabilities in an alternative format, agreed upon between the requester and the Clerk. Notice of the provision of information in an alternative format will be provided on the City’s election website, www.owensoundvotes.ca, and included in the election notices in the local media. 4. Notice of Temporary Service Disruption The City Clerk will provide public notice on the City’s election website, www.owensoundvotes.ca, and in the local media if there is a temporary disruption in the delivery of election information or services. The notice will include the reason for the disruption, the expected duration, and an explanation of alternative methods of delivering the information or service. Every effort will be made to provide alternative methods of providing the information or service to persons with disabilities. 5. Staff Assistance The Election team is available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. Contact information for assistance: 6. Telephone: 519-370-7350 Email: elections@owensound.ca In Person: City Hall Service Counter 808 2 nd Avenue East Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4 Mail: City Clerk City of Owen Sound 808 2 nd Avenue East Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4 Assistance to Electors The 2026 Owen Sound municipal election will be conducted with internet and telephone voting methods. Detailed information about each voting method is set out in the 2026 Internet/Telephone Voting Procedure, available on the City’s election website, 4 Page 56 of 126 Page 57 of 126 www.owensoundvotes.ca, or from the Election team and can be provided in an alternative format upon request. Please contact us at 519-370-7350 or elections@owensound.ca if you require your Voter Information Letter in an accessible format. The Election team is available throughout the election to assist with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. 7. Election Centres Election Centres located in the municipality will be available to voters throughout the voting period and on voting day until 8:00 p.m. The locations, accessible parking and entrance information will be posted on the City’s election website, www.owensoundvotes.ca. Parking Election Centres will be located in buildings that have private or municipal designated parking for individuals with disabilities. Entrance The entrances to Election Centres will be level or have steps and ramps with handrails leading to the entrance doors. Doors will have automatic door opening devices or will be propped open in a safe manner. The doors will be wide enough to accommodate a wheelchair or other mobility devices. Interior Access to the interior voting area and voting booth will be level. Carpeting and doormats will be level with the floor. The voting area will be well lit, and seating shall be made available. Accessible Voting Booth The voting booth will have a wide area to allow individuals using mobility aids to vote independently and secretly. In the voting booth there will be a touchscreen tablet on a stand. The tilt of the touchscreen is adjustable. At Brightshores Health System – Owen Sound, retirement homes, and long-term care facilities, a mobile tablet will also be available. Elevator Access At any location where an Election Centre is not located on the main floor, an accessible elevator will be available. Voting Assistance Persons with disabilities may be accompanied by a support person within the voting booth or the Election Centre staff can assist a voter 5 Page 57 of 126 Page 58 of 126 in casting their vote. The Election Centre staff will, in conjunction with the person with the disability, determine the extent to which they need assistance and the best way to provide the assistance. If public health guidelines and the facilities allow access, election staff will be on-site at Brightshores Health System – Owen Sound, retirement homes, and long-term care homes at various times in the voting period to increase accessibility. All election officials are sworn to an oath of secrecy. 8. Internet Voting and Telephone Voting Both internet voting and telephone voting offer persons with a variety of disabilities to cast their vote with independence and privacy. Internet voting allows voters to vote from their home through secured internet services. Voters have the option to use the assistive tools they have on their own computer such as paddles, a hand-held touchpad, a thumb switch or sip and puff technology. Telephone voting allows voters to vote from their home through secured telephone services. Landlines or cell phones can be used to vote and the method is compatible with assistive devices. Both methods are designed to encourage voter participation as voters don’t have to attend a physical location to cast their ballot and accessibility and privacy for persons with disabilities is maximized. 9. Assistance to Candidates The 2026 Owen Sound municipal election will be conducted with internet and telephone voting methods. Detailed information about each voting method is set out in the 2026 Internet/Telephone Voting Procedure, available on the City’s election website, www.owensoundvotes.ca, or from the Election team and can be provided in an alternative format upon request. The Election team is available throughout the election to assist candidates with any issues that may arise with respect to providing a barrier-free election. Accessibility measures for candidates to consider in regard to their campaign messaging are included in the candidate package. 6 Page 58 of 126 Page 59 of 126 10. Feedback The City Clerk welcomes feedback to identify areas where changes need to be considered and ways in which the City can improve the delivery of an accessible election. This plan is a living document and will continue to undergo changes when necessary. Feedback on this plan can be submitted through the following: 11. Telephone: 519-370-7350 Email: elections@owensound.ca In Person: City Hall Service Counter 808 2 nd Avenue East Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4 Mail: City Clerk City of Owen Sound 808 2 nd Avenue East Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4 Additional Information Owen Sound Accessibility Webpage: www.owensound.ca/accessibility/ Owen Sound Election Website: www.owensoundvotes.ca 7 Page 59 of 126
Owen Sound's new forest monument at Harry Lumley Bayshore consolidates plaques onto a digital QR database, protecting existing oaks while distributing urban tree care to prevent future overcrowding. Meanwhile, a secondary school project faces scrutiny over winter accessibility, with officials questioning whether guardrails or lighting are needed for safe access to the eastern athletic field. The city must actively support year-round connections to the Rail Trail rather than relying on seasonal paths that could leave students stranded. On 4th Avenue West, the city confronts a critical choice between a cheap status-quo fix or a transformative redesign that replaces parking with multi-use paths. This shift increases impervious surfaces, straining local stormwater capacity and forcing costlier runoff upgrades, effectively pushing financial burdens onto ratepayers. Without mandatory snow-clearing upgrades, proposed bike lanes risk closing entirely in winter, undermining equitable transport options. The project prioritizes active transit but demands private property grading and tree removal to avoid retaining walls, challenging historic neighborhood character. Additionally, the failing pedestrian tunnel under 16th Street East requires a concrete slab repair to stop freeze-thaw damage caused by leaking water. The city will widen the road to add an AODA-compliant sidewalk and steel guiderail, saving materials by rehabilitating rather than replacing infrastructure. However, these improvements still generate temporary greenhouse gas emissions. These developments collectively illustrate how infrastructure choices determine who bears the cost of climate resilience and whether public spaces remain accessible to all residents year-round.
Staff relocate the proposed monument to the accessible Harry Lumley Bayshore waterfront, utilizing a QR code to manage online donor information and reducing ongoing physical maintenance duties for the new central structure.
City staff propose celebrating donors with an annual event and launching a GIS layer to map trees while strengthening urban forest infrastructure for climate adaptation.
The commemorative forest monument proposal has been supplanted by a detailed site plan for a new secondary school and shop building on the east side of 28th Avenue East. This development includes future portables, extensive parking, athletic fields, and a pedestrian pathway connected to the Rail Trail to serve the Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board community.
Public sector funding requires the project to provide wider pathways, extra accessible parking spaces, and pedestrian lighting to ensure full AODA compliance during construction.
Staff will use Committee feedback to finalize a reconstruction design that balances preserving mature tree canopy, neighborhood walkability, and historic character on 4th Avenue West.
Page 60 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Report Code: CS-26-024 Subject: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-024 respecting the Commemorative Forest Monument proposed design, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purposes. Highlights: • • • • • Feedback from the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee will be used when finalizing the design concept. The Memorial Tree Program was restructured in 2021 into a Commemorative Forest Program to prevent overcrowding, optimize planting, promote native species, and reduce ongoing maintenance. The monument’s location, originally planned for Harrison Park, is recommended to be moved to the west side of the Harry Lumley Bayshore, near the waterfront. This change is based on improved accessibility, carrying capacity, scenic value, and long-term expansion potential. An online commemorative tree webpage is in development and will be linked by QR code at the monument site. It will allow for enhanced information sharing (e.g., photos, names, events) without cluttering the physical site. Staff have been working with Thomas Dean, Landscape Architect, on a design that fits the contemplative nature of the site. It Staff Report CS-26-024: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Page 1 of 5 Page 60 of 126 Page 61 of 126 • integrates existing trails, parking, gardens, and gazebos, with room to grow as more commemorative trees are added over time. Staff have maintained communication with tree donors and will consider an annual recognition event once this monument is in place. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: Green and Resilient City - Strengthening the City’s environmental, social, and economic ability to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis. Also, leveraging the city’s natural resources and infrastructure to support healthy lifestyles. Previous Report/Authority: CS-21-010 Memorial Tree Program – Proposed Restructuring CS-22-122 Commemorative Forest Monument Location and Concept Design CS-25-050 Parks Capital Projects 2025 – Proposed Amendments and Adjustments to the 2025 Capital Plan CS-25-063 Proposed Design and Location of the commemorative Forest Monument Background: In 2021, the City restructured the memorial tree program into a Commemorative Forest Program model, with report CS-21-010 Memorial Tree Program - Proposed Restructuring. This new Memorial Tree Program has been designed to: • • • • • Prevent over-crowding of trees in popular locations. Promote more even distribution of trees throughout the City’s parks and trails. Permit staff to plan resources and optimize planting timing for each tree species. Permit staff to select native tree species that are best suited to soil microclimate and light conditions specific to each location. Allow for a long-term approach when selecting tree species, considering the tree’s requirements over its entire lifecycle, including typical crown diameter, height, and growing habit. Staff Report CS-26-024: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Page 2 of 5 Page 61 of 126 Page 62 of 126 • • • Provides for a central monument commemorating the contribution in a centralized location, reducing the duty for care of plaques and markers at the base of trees in park settings is eliminated. Require less frequent customer contact related to each individual request, as planting locations will be selected and arranged by the City and follow-up contact related to plaque purchases and installation will be reduced. Avoid creating negative experiences in the future for donors when trees planted too close together don’t mature evenly or with the classic characteristics of a chosen tree species. In 2022, a report presented the proposed location and design of the monument in Harrison Park. The location was just north of the toboggan hill. This location was modified through the Harrison Park Master Plan. Given accessibility considerations, the Master Plan recommended a location for the monument adjacent to the memorial forest at the 2 nd Avenue East entrance near the paved trail. Since that time, staff have worked to develop an online commemorative tree page on the City’s website. This page will be linked by a QR code and will include the name and additional information about the person or event being commemorated, photos etc. This will simplify the information provided at the location of the commemorative site. Analysis and Options: Staff have been working with Thomas Dean, Landscape Architect, on the design for the monument. As this work has occurred, staff have reconsidered the best location for the commemorative monument that will serve the city in the short and long term. A new location in the open space on the west side of the Harry Lumley Bayshore is recommended (Attachment 1). This site is preferred due to: • • • Accessibility. It is proximate to an existing paved trail and parking lot that has ample room and existing accessible spaces; Capacity of the Space. It is in an area that is underutilized with a beautiful water view and proximate to the Bayshore Garden. This space has the capacity to support this additional use; Room for Growth. The location will allow the future expansion of the monument and allow this space and monument to serve the City for decades; Staff Report CS-26-024: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Page 3 of 5 Page 62 of 126 Page 63 of 126 • Infrastructure and Amenities. In addition to the paved trail and existing parking, the site has playgrounds, gardens, and a gazebo in a waterfront setting that lend themselves to the more quiet and contemplative nature of this monument. The new monument and placement include the following features (see Attachment 2): • • • • • • • Semi-circular limestone screening path connected to the paved trail. Path may be hard surfaced subject to budget; The path links to the existing paved waterfront trail and is 2.0 to 3.5 m in width; Three benches (City standard) along the expanded path width; Garden area with ground cover and plantings (Serviceberry); Central monument. The panel is proposed to be made of roughsawn cedar (2” x 6”) with a semi-transparent finish. There are 28”x8” powder-coated steel posts. The words “Commemorative Forest” appear on the front (east side). On the reverse is space for a description of the program as well as the QR code. The QR code links to the commemorative forest page on the City’s accessible webpage. The webpage will provide information in an accessible format for everyone. The area has been integrated into the space and retains a large oak and an existing tulip tree. City staff have the expertise to create the associated webpage and keep this current in real time. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources Capital project 23D.14 - $40,000 Human Resources City staff have been working with Thomas Dean on the design. City communications staff have updated the commemorative forest program webpage that describes the new online direction. The commemorative tree program will be reinstated shortly following the completion of the construction work and installation of the sign containing the QR code. The QR code on the monument sign will provide a direct link to the City’s web site where you will be able to view commemorative tree donor information. Staff Report CS-26-024: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Page 4 of 5 Page 63 of 126 Page 64 of 126 Time and Scheduling Following input from the County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee, the design will be tendered for award and construction in the summer of 2026. Technology and Infrastructure The City’s website has been updated for this project. Climate and Environmental Impacts: This supports the objectives of the City’s Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan by strengthening the natural infrastructure, including the urban forest. Communication and Engagement: Staff have been in communication with people who have made donations under the new program and are awaiting the new monument. The City may wish to have an annual celebration for those who have made donations of commemorative trees during the year. The webpage for the project is prepared along with a GIS tree layer that would be launched as part of this project. Report Developed in Consultation With: Manager of Parks and Open Space Attachments: Attachment 1 - Commemorative Forest Monument Area Design Reviewed by: Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services at pcoulter@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 Ext. 1208. Staff Report CS-26-024: Commemorative Forest Monument Proposed Design Page 5 of 5 Page 64 of 126 Page 65 of 126 landscape Plan Commemorative forest monument City of Owen Sound Scale 1:50 sheet 3 of 5: Planting plan 0 5 metres 0 5 feet 10 15 1. 2 planters supplied/installed by the City Sl to w ope 2 ate % r (t yp.) 2. 3 benches supplied/installed by the City 3. h wit s t us r roo ats o ) radi e ' e t tr sion mm (15 c e t s Pro mpre ff 4.5 o co ce fen Slope 2% to water (typ.) 30º typ ++ Existing Red Oak Garden Bed e 2%yp.) p o l S (t ater w to Garden Bed: Excavate to same depth as bottom of crusher run base for pathways (see detail Sheet 2). Dig in approx 150 mm of Gro-Max Premium Garden Soil. After planting, apply approx 75 mm of natural cedar mulch. to Slo w pe at 2 er % (ty p. ) 2. 1. Plant List Item Qty Species/Cultivar 1 2 3 2 2 22 Common Name Tsuga canadensis Canadian Hemlock Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Robin Hill’ Standard Robin Hill Serviceberry Std. Cornus sericea 'Arctic Fire™' (Farrow) Arctic Fire Dwarf Dogwood Size 200 cm WB 40 mm WB 3 gal. Note: No substitutions in size or species without express consent from designer Designer to conrm placement before planting Page 65 of 126 3. Page 66 of 126 landscape Plan Commemorative forest monument City of Owen Sound Scale As noted sheet 4 of 5: sign structure Post centres 2032 mm (6' 8") 5" channel x 1.75" ange x .19 wall with welded end plate (2 req.) 230 mm (9") square x 25 mm (1") thick cap (2 req.) 1/2" square bar detail @ 1/2" spacing 1/4" dia. pin welded to channel end plate to prevent rotation (4 req.) 1220 mm (48") between studs 267 mm (10 1/2") = Trim cap1.9" OD tube x .125" wall - see detail below = 5/8" dia. HD galvanized bolt, nut and lockwasher (4 req.) 1016 mm (3' 4") 7" square steel tube x .188 wall (2 req.) Between posts 1855 mm (6' 1") 2285 mm (7' 6") 300 mm (12") square base plate x 10 mm (3/8") thick Gussets both sides 1/4" thick - see detail Sign Frame Scale 1:10 4 holes for 3/4" anchor bolt Edge distance 44 mm (1.75") typ. Drill post for 1/4" dia. pin on centre Install1/2" dia. x 1" long hex bolt 2 places each channel Tack weld bolt head to underside of top ange 19 mm (3/4") edge distance typ. Gussets 15 mm (6") height Post Base and Channel Detail Scale 1:2 Welded end cap 1/8" thick 1.90 x 1/8" wall tube x 1 1/2" long Drill for 5/8" dia. bolt ^ Drain hole 1/8" dia. Align with bottom of tube on assembly Trim Cap Detail - 4 Req. Scale Full Size Page 66 of 126 Page 67 of 126 landscape Plan Commemorative forest monument City of Owen Sound Scale as noted sheet 5 of 5: East facing sign panel Overall width of assembled panel 1830 mm (72") space planks 1 mm. If cutting is required to achieve exact overall width, rip two outside planks by the same amount Top of angle aligns with top of planks 100 mm (4") Cor-ten steel letters and leaf shape to be from Gemini Canada. Drill pattern provided for mounting holes. Use stainless steel machine screws, spacers and washers (provided) to attach from back side of assembled wood panel. COMMEMORATIVE FOREST 1220 mm (48") 127 mm (5") Sign Panel Assembly Rough sawn kiln-dried eastern white cedar (2" x 6" full size) planks Plane backs to 1 1/2" thickness. All planks to be same thickness. Before assembly, nish with minimum 2 coats semi-transparent stain (brand and colour TBA). Scale 1:10 Attach cedar planks to angles with two 1/4" x 1 1/2" HD galv. lag screws spaced 4" apart. Suggest drilling angles after laying out planking Angles (2 req.) 3" x 2" x 3/16" 1830 mm (72") in length 38mm (1½") edge dist. 25 mm (1") edge dist. Drill 9/16" holes 2 places each angle to match spacing of studs in channels. Lift assembled panel onto sign frame structure and secure in place with HD galv. nuts and lockwashers on studs (2 places - top channel only). Protect threads of studs with heavy grease or silicone application. Channel Gap Mounting Angle Detail Scale 1:2 Page 67 of 126 Page 68 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Margaret Potter, Senior Planner Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Report Code: CS-26-025 Subject: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-025 respecting the Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purposes. Highlights: • • • • Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board has applied for Site Plan Approval for a new secondary school. Every district school board is a designated public sector organization. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). This report seeks to obtain input into matters of accessibility in the site design. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 1 of 8 Page 68 of 126 Page 69 of 126 Previous Report/Authority: Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act 2005 Integrated Accessibility Standards O.Reg 191/11 Ontario Planning Act (s. 41) City of Owen Sound Official Plan City of Owen Sound Zoning By-law (2010-078, as amended) Recommendation Report - Zoning By-law Amendment No. 56 – 28 th Avenue East (BGCDSB) Background & Proposal: A Site Plan Approval application (ST2025-018) has been submitted by the Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) for the construction of a new secondary school. Every district school board as defined in the Education Act is considered part of the Broader Public Sector under Schedule 1 of the Integrated Accessibility Standard and is therefore a “designated public sector organization” under the standard (O. Reg. 191/11). As the project is being managed by a designated public sector organization with funding from the Government of Ontario, staff understand that these bodies are responsible to ensure compliance with AODA. City staff have reviewed the application against the City’s Zoning By-law and applied an accessibility checklist based on the Integrated Accessibility Standards for Design of Public Spaces. The purpose of this report is to inform the JAAC about this project and obtain input on recommendations respecting accessibility. Analysis and Options: Site Location 2753 15 th Street East is located on the west side of 28 th Avenue East (Grey Road 5), approximately 260 metres south of 16 th Street East (Highway 26). The property has approximately 146 metres of frontage on 28 th Avenue East and approximately 500 metres of lot depth. The rear of the property is Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 2 of 8 Page 69 of 126 Page 70 of 126 bounded by the Grey County Rail Trail (Rail Trail). Along the northerly property line of the site, a new 15 th Street East will be constructed to provide access to the property. The new 15 th Street road allowance extends from 28 th Avenue East to the Rail Trail. From a new intersection with 28 th Avenue East, 15 th Street East will be constructed approximately 200m west as an open and maintained municipal street with a sidewalk along the south side (in front of the school). Within the remainder of the road allowance a paved multi-use pathway will provide non-vehicular connection to the Rail Trail. Along 28 th Avenue East a future sidewalk is planned to be constructed when adjacent lands to the north or south are developed. Improvements in the road allowance will be required to be completed by the developer under a Servicing Agreement with the City of Owen Sound. On-site Facility Orientation On site, the proposal is to construct a new secondary school and separate shop building. The plan also shows the location of future portables should they become necessary. The site plan provides for the following: • • All vehicular access to the site will be from 15 th Street East (north lot line) Main School Building (10,076 square metres /108,460 square feet) o o o o o • Shop Building (944 square metres) o • Oriented to the southwest of the main school. Future Portables planned for (up to 8) o • Oriented close to 28 th Avenue East three-storey building with elevator A main canopied entrance to the school faces north. Internal corridors lead to secondary entrances at the northwest, southwest, and southeast sides of the building. Outside of the main entrance is a patio area with seating. Along the west side of the building area are a variety of seating options both within landscaped areas and on hard surface. Oriented in a row along the south side of the main school, east of shop. Pedestrian access to buildings Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 3 of 8 Page 70 of 126 Page 71 of 126 o o o • Bus Layby and Small Parking Lot o o o o o • A dedicated bus layby is proposed along the north side of the school. The vehicular accesses to this layby are shared with a small parking area. This area has two accesses to 15 th Street East allowing buses to pull in and through the layby. Parking stalls are separated from the bus layby by an island. Two (2) barrier free parking spaces in this area are adjacent to the sidewalk leading to the main building entrance. Main Parking Area o o o o • Paved pathways are provided around the perimeter of the building, generally 3 metres in width connecting all main entrances to the building with adjacent streets, the shop, future portables, patio seating, bus loading and parking areas. Where crossing of drive aisles is necessary, TWSIs are proposed with painted crossing (or HUB system) proposed to differentiate these pathways from the main parking aisles. Connections are provided to the 15 th Street East sidewalk and multi-use pathway as well as athletic field path (discussed further below) A separate vehicular entrance from 15 th Street East to the main parking area is west of above-mentioned bus loading and unloading. This parking lot is located between the school and the athletic fields. The main drive aisle is also the Fire Route and provides access to loading spaces and waste receptacles which are south of the main building in the vicinity of the shop. Three (3) barrier free parking spaces in this area are adjacent to the sidewalk leading to the westerly building entrance. Athletic Field Access o o Beyond the parking area, the land slopes down towards a watercourse that bisects the westerly portion of the property from south to north. There are two athletic fields proposed, one on either side of this watercourse. Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 4 of 8 Page 71 of 126 Page 72 of 126 o o A pedestrian pathway (2.65m wide or more) from the sidewalk around the school building crosses the parking lot at the narrowest point with TWSIs and painted crossing (or HUB system) and connects to an asphalt pathway for access to the easterly athletic field. Due to the slope, this 3.0 m wide asphalt pathway includes a switchback, with an informal stone staircase providing a shortcut for those that area able to use it. The switchback pathway is labelled to have a max. slope of 5% (1:20). At the apex of the switchback, the path widens and a seating area is provided. ▪ ▪ ▪ o • • The downslope of this seating area is protected by armour stones providing a guard and designed as the top level of seating built into the slope for viewing athletic events. • The seating area platform is large enough for tables and chairs to be located off of the travelled pathway. Barrier free viewing is thereby incorporated into the overall landscape design. This asphalt pathway rounds the northeast corner of the easterly athletic field and connects to the multi-use pathway in the 15th Street East road allowance and connecting to the westerly athletic field. The sidewalk around the school also connects to the sidewalk on the south side of 15 th Street East between the two parking areas, and does not require crossing the parking lot. This provides another route to the multi-use pathway and westerly athletic field from the school. Lighting o o o A site lighting plan has been provided demonstrating that the school, parking lots, and sidewalks in between will be lit. Lighting of the pedestrian pathway to and from the athletic field is not confirmed. To reduce environmental impact on natural habitats, lighting is to be directed away from the naturalized areas Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 5 of 8 Page 72 of 126 Page 73 of 126 o • The applicant has been asked to consider pedestrian level lighting particularly of the asphalt pathway to the easterly athletic field. Access to Transit & Amenities o o o The adjacent Rail Trail provides 3 season connection to the existing trail network in the City Options for a 4-season connection to existing development on 16 th Street East is being explored by the applicant. This may include construction of municipal sidewalk along 16 th Street East and 28 th Avenue East. The nearest transit stop at this time is at the Heritage Grove Shopping Centre (Winners). The need for any adjustment to existing transit routes will be considered by the City as development progresses. The bulb at the end of 15 th Street East is sized to accommodate buses. Analysis and Recommendations for Accessibility The site design has an attractive and functional layout that considers the human experience by providing wider pedestrian pathways than required, avoids crossing of parking areas wherever possible, and includes thoughtful location of outdoor gathering and seating areas. Additional accessible parking spaces are required to comply with zoning. The applicant has been asked to provide two (2) more spaces, one each of Type A and Type B. The Site Plan will be required to comply with the zoning bylaw in force and effect at the time of Site Plan Approval for accessible parking stall quantity and type. City design standards for parking stall size and signage are already included in the applicant’s detailed drawings. The asphalt pathway from the school to the easterly athletic field should be reviewed by the applicant against the built environment standards to identify any need for guards or edge protection based on the slope and cross slope. Pedestrian level lighting of this pedestrian pathway would enhance accessibility during seasons of low natural light. As the project is being managed by a designated public sector organization with funding from the Government of Ontario, these bodies are responsible to ensure compliance with AODA. Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 6 of 8 Page 73 of 126 Page 74 of 126 Resource Alignment: Financial Resources N/A. Human Resources N/A. Time and Scheduling N/A. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: This report has been posted to the County’s website with the agenda in advance of the meeting. The Site Plan Approval Application has been circulated to various City Departments and external commenting agencies as part of the normal site plan approval process and their comments along with those from the GCJAAC will be considered in the final recommendation report. Report Developed in Consultation With: N/A Attachments: 1. Schedule A – Orthophoto 2. Schedule B – Site Plan Reviewed by: Sabine Robart, M.SC. (PL), MCIP, RPP, Manager of Planning & Heritage Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 7 of 8 Page 74 of 126 Page 75 of 126 Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning & Heritage at srobart@owensound.ca or 519 376 4440 ext. 1236. Staff Report CS-26-025: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) Site Plan (ST2025-018) Page 8 of 8 Page 75 of 126 Page 76 of 126 ± Schedule 'A': Orthophoto 2049 1929 1820 27th Ave E 1990 1730 18th St E 1660 2050 2010 17th St E 2707 1624 1590 20th Ave E 16th St E 2275 1555 2125 203354 28th Ave E 2580 2350 8th St E 2791 2251 398267 2575 Subject Property 398247 Information shown on these drawings/maps/charts 1750 0 70 140 280 398241 Meters is 2250 76 of 126 compiledPage from numerous sources and may not 420 be complete or accurate 398235 Page 77 of 126 KEY MAP SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 2753 15th Street East, Owen Sound, Ontario BUILDING SETBACK Highway 26 E 16th St SITE DATA FENCE - Painted Directional Arrow on Asphalt Pavement Surface DATA - Catch Basin LOT AREA (m²) MIN 800 (m2) 75,329 (m²) LOT COVERAGE MAX 60% 7.63% LOT COVERAGE - ACCESSORY MAX 12% 1.33% MIN. LANDSCAPE SPACE MIN 25% 68.9% FRONT YARD (m) 7.5 (m) 15.7 (m) GENERAL NOTES INTERIOR SIDE YARD (m) 1.0 (m) 15.6 (m) EXTERIOR SIDE YARD (m) 3.0 (m) 41.7 (m) 1. Do not scale drawings. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions. REAR YARD (m) 2.0 (m) 323.8 (m) CURRENT ZONING ENTRANCE / EXIT CB OVER HEAD DOOR OHD - Catch Basin / Man Hole MH MANHOLE SETBACKS BARRIER FREE PARKING SIGNAGE BF HYDRO POLE LIGHT STANDARD HP/LS 15th St CB/MH E FIRE HYDRANT LIGHT STANDARD LS FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ERTY T PROP C E J B SU WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FLUSH CURB ve E 28th A Rail Trail GAS METER BUILDING DATA - MAIN SCHOOL BL BOLLARD DATA CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROVIDED ZONING - 'I' INSTITUTIONAL GM 600 WIDE YELLOW TACTILE WARNING INDICATOR T REQUIRED REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING AREA (m2) - 5,748 m2 GROSS FLOOR AREA (m2) - 10,076 m2 NUMBER OF STOREYS - 3 MAX 16 m 15.02 m BUILDING HEIGHT (AS PER MINOR VARIANCE #A15-2025) FLOOR SPACE INDEX MAX 1.5 0.13 LOT COVERAGE MAX 60% 7.63% BUILDING DATA - ACCESSORY - SHOP 8th St DATA E NORTH REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING AREA (m2) - 944 m2 GROSS FLOOR AREA (m2) - 944 m2 NUMBER OF STOREYS - 1 BUILDING HEIGHT MAX 12 m 9.06 m FLOOR SPACE INDEX MAX 1.5 0.013 LOT COVERAGE MAX 12% 1.25% Project North True North 2. All work shall comply with the 2024 Ontario Building Code and amendments. 3. Contractors must check and verify all dimensions and specifications and report any discrepancies to the architect before proceeding with the work. 4. All contractors and sub-contractors shall have a set of approved construction documents on site at all times. 5. All documents remain the property of the architect. Unauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction of these documents is prohibited without written permission. The contract documents were prepared by the consultant for the account of the owner. 6. The material contained herein reflects the consultants best judgement in light of the information available to him at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of the contract documents, or any reliance on/or decisions to be made based on them are the responsibility of such third parties. 7. The consultant accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on the contract documents. BUILDING DATA - ACCESSORY - PORTABLES DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING AREA (m2) - 598 m2 GROSS FLOOR AREA (m2) - 598 m2 NUMBER OF STOREYS - 1 BUILDING HEIGHT MAX 12 m 3.9 m FLOOR SPACE INDEX MAX 1.5 0.0079 LOT COVERAGE MAX 12% 0.08% REQUIRED PROVIDED STANDARD PARKING STALLS 114 236 BARRIER FREE PARKING STALLS 5 5 TOTAL 241 VEHICLE PARKING DATA DATA ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PARKING DATA DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED EV PARKING SPACES - INSTALLED 1 1 EV PARKING SPACES - READY 25 25 CLASSROOM COUNTS & GROSS AREA DATA DATA PORTABLES GFA 8 598 m2 REFER TO SHEET "SP01.03 ROOM AREAS" FUTURE LOCAL ROAD 'A' BUILDING AND SHOPS PAINTED HATCH AREA 3.00 m BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 5,748 m2 133 3.00 m SOD SOD 8' x 20' SEA CANS OHD FIRE ROUTE OHD NEW SHOP BUILDING 1 STOREY BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 944 m2 OHD 10.00 m LOADING SPACES LS PORT. H TRUCK TURN 1.41 m AROUND OHD OHD PRIVACY FENCING COVERED DUST COLLECTOR AREA OHD PORT. G GRAVEL AREA DROPPED CURB PORT. F SOD 8601 15.57 m SETBACK 3.38 m 2.70 m OHD PRINCIPLE ENTRANCE 3.20 m 2.50 m 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2026-01-06 2025-12-19 2025-11-28 2025-08-06 2025-07-31 2025-07-18 2025-06-18 2025-05-20 2025-04-01 No. Date REISSUED FOR SPA SUBMISSION 01 ISSUED FOR SPA SUBMISSION 01 ISSUED FOR PRE-SPA SUBMISSION ISSUED FOR PRE-CONSULTATION ISSUED FOR MINOR VARIANCE ISSUED FOR COORDINAITON ISSUED FOR COORDINATION ISSUED FOR ZBA COORDINATION Revision Client: ASPHALT TRANSFORMER PIPE BOLLARDS (8) PORT. E PORT. D LS PORT. C SOD PORT. B PORT. A 92.88 m SETBACK 73.71 m SETBACK 54.27 m SETBACK 34.17 m SETBACK 125.28 m SETBACK PORTABLES A THROUGH H TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASED SEQUENCE AT FUTURE DATE GRAVEL AREA ACCOMMODATING FUTURE PORTABLES TO BE PROVIDED AS PART OF INITIAL SITE WORKS SOD FUTURE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SNOW STORAGE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 3.00 m 114 21.86 m SETBACK LS 2.80 m 9.19 m 1.80 m PROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT 145.933 ASPHALT SOD 95 2.00 m 76 3.00 m 57 5.24 m 38 SOD 28th AVE EAST 3.00 m 3.00 m NEW HIGH SCHOOL 3 STOREYS 43.88 m SETBACK LS FUTURE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 41.73 m SETBACK SNOW STORAGE 2.85 m 3.50 m 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 5.58 m 5.00 m FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY BOX PRINCIPLE ENTRANCE 3.00 m SOD HUB SURFACE SYSTEM, TYP. 6.00 m 15.72 m SETBACK 3.00 m 19 LOCATION OF EXISTING BUTTERNUT TREES 5.00 m FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FACE OF BUILDING ABOVE 150.9 m 50.45 m ASPHALT 12 m NATURALIZATION AREA REFER TO LANDSCAPE (139.8) CANOPY ABOVE 3.50 m 2% 11.8 TYP SOD LS 1.00 m 237.5 LS SOD 3.00 m LS 19 118.98 m SETBACK 5.90 m 19 PARKING SPACES N81° 19' 50"W 2.85 m TYPE A 10 1.50 m (694) BIKE PARKING SOD 133 PARKING SPACES 236.36 3.00 m 1.70 m 3.40 m 96 26.48 m FLAG POLES (3) 21.7 115 TYPE A TYPE B 24.35 m 77 DROP CURB 11 LS 54 7. ° 0 09 8' 5 25 23.00 m "W 21.7 3.00 m SOD BIKE PARKING SOD LS 57 N 96.4 6.00 m 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m SNOW STORAGE LA N DSC BUIL APED S E T IN TO H ATING IL L NDS CAP E REF E 0m SOD SOD TYPE B 4% 16 m 3.0 FUTURE CEREMONIAL SPACE /GARDEN NATURALIZATION AREA REFER TO LANDSCAPE 58 BUS LOADING 3.31 m 3% 237.25 HUB SURFACE SYSTEM, TYP. 1.86 m ASPHALT DROP CURB 3.30 m 235.85 39 LS 114.77 m SETBACK m 20 ASPHALT 2.65 m 500 1500 237.66 LS 1 8.52 m WAT ERC R TO OUR CIVI L AN SE D LA 4-LA NE TRA CK m 100.00 1000 984 750 0 137. N3° 4 7' INF PED ORMAL CRO ESTRIA WAT SSING N O ERC OUR F SE 1000 234.95 3.00 SNOW STORAGE AS PH AL T ASPHAL T 1000 234.88 55"E LS 239.15 FOO TBA LL F IELD HUB SURFACE SYSTEM, TYP. SOD 6.00 m ATHLETIC FIELD 6.80 m SOD 7.85 m SOD 2% 40.92 m LS 32 7.85 m . MAX 5% m LS 16 23 9 239.50 30 1.00 m 60.0 0m 32 PARKING SPACES 2.65 m 6.00 m 154.7 57 RAIL TRA IL Autodesk Docs://23026 - Owen Sound New CSS (BGCDSB)_R2025/23026_Owen Sound New CSS_BGCDSB_SITE.rvt ASPHALT SLOPED PATHWAY TO CONNECT TO RAIL TRAIL / SPORTS FIELD 9.00 m TYPE A 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 1 3.51 m 3.13 m ASPHALT 57 PARKING SPACES 15.32 m LS 6.00 m 10 17 SOD SOD ASPHALT 29 43.00 m 233.22 24 EV CHARGER SITE SIGNAGE ENTRY/ EXIT 6.00 m 36.85 m CANOPY SETBACK ASPHALT 1 LS 25 EV READY SPACES 76.91 m 5.00 m FIRE ROUTE 8.00 m LS 5.00 m 10.00 m LS 281.54 m 60.00 1 9.00 m 4.05 m 4.33 m 2441 SOD SOD ENTRY/ EXIT 2.70 m AS PH AL T N81° 03' 00"E 6.00 m 7.30 m 6.00 m 5.58 m TREE GROVE AND LOW MAINTENANCE POLLINATOR PLANTING AREA REFER TO LANDSCAPE ENTRY/ EXIT 5.00 m 5.00 m 5.00 m 360.5 0 SETB m ACK 5.00 m 476.559 12 m SOD PROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT 12 m 5.00 m 5.00 m CULVERT SIGHT TRIANGLE 15th St E SIGHT TRIANGLE 5.00 m ASPHALT 8.64 m ASPHALT 5.00 m CONNECTION TO RAILTRAIL ASPHALT SIGHT TRIANGLE 2.50 m P-GATE WITH CHUB BOX FOR ACCESS BY EMS 3.00 m P-GATE WITH CHUB BOX FOR ACCESS BY EMS SIGNED NO WINTER MAINTENANCE % 4.5 Do not scale drawings. Contractors must check and verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies to the Architect before proceeding with the work. All documents remain the property of the Architect. Unauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction of these documents is prohibitted without written permission. The Contract Documents were prepared by the Consultant for the account of the Owner. The material contained herein reflects the Consultants best judgement in light of the information available to him at the time of preparation Any use which a third party makes of the Contract Documents, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on them are the responsibility of such third parties. The Consultant accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on the Contract Documents. CLASSROOMS Project Name / Address: NEW BGCDSB OWEN SOUND CSS 2753 15th STREET EAST, OWEN SOUND Project No: GARBAGE & RECYCLING APPROXIMATED TREE LINE. 23026 516.716 Drawing Date: N81° 03' 00"E 2025-12-19 516.7 m Drawn by: Checked by: JHF JAA Office Location: KITCHENER Plot Date / Time: 1 2026-01-06 3:02:56 PM SITE PLAN Drawing Name: 1 : 600 SITE PLAN Drawing Scale: As indicated Status: Revision No.: JEFFREY ATCHISON LICENCE 7254 Page 77 of 126 ISSUED FOR SPA r9 Drawing No.: SP01.01 Page 78 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Report Code: OP-26-012 Subject: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-012 respecting the preliminary design options for the 4 th Avenue West reconstruction (15 th St to 20 th St), the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purposes. Highlights: • • • • • The City is undertaking a complete infrastructure renewal on 4 th Avenue West between 15 th and 20 th Streets. Currently, the design is underway. Feedback from the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee will be used when finalizing the design concept. Staff hosted a Public Information Centre (PIC) within the project area to gather public feedback within the neighbourhood, which drew strong attendance compared with typical PICs. The considerations to be discussed include the provision or absence of on-street parking, active transportation facilities, and traffic calming. All of these options have advantages and disadvantages, including but not limited to the ability to preserve the mature tree canopy, the walkability of the neighbourhood, and maintaining the historic character. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 1 of 12 Page 78 of 126 Page 79 of 126 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development, planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents and tourists. Previous Report/Authority: This project has been approved as part of the Capital Program, project 25P.2. The award of the Engineering Contract was approved on September 8 th, 2026, by Council through Report CR-25-114 “Award of RFP-25-004 Engineering Services for 4th Ave W Reconstruction - 15th St W to 20th St W” Background: The City has retained WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) to complete the detailed design for the reconstruction of the following roads: • • • 4th Ave. West, from 15th St. West to 20th St. West (775 m) 16th St. West, from 4th Ave. West to 5th Ave. West (145 m) 17th St. West, from 3rd Ave. West to 5th Ave. West (250 m) The project has been prioritized primarily to renew the existing infrastructure within this area. As a collector road, this corridor serves a large area, including a portion of Georgian Bluffs developed along the City Boundary. It is an alternative corridor to Eddie Sargent Parkway and was previously Brook Township’s Main Street. It is a vital link between a large residential area and the City’s current downtown, providing a major north-south pedestrian corridor. Both the City’s deep underground utilities (water, wastewater, and storm sewer) and the surface infrastructure (roads and sidewalks) are largely at or beyond the end of their service lives. When undertaking a complete infrastructure renewal, it is an opportune time to assess opportunities to add or enhance active transportation, safety, and accessibility features for road users, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 2 of 12 Page 79 of 126 Page 80 of 126 The proposed design aims to address localized flooding by strategically designing above-ground infrastructure (pavement, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, signage, etc.). Lastly, as the corridor is known for its mature tree canopy, WSP has been tasked with minimizing the removal of healthy trees. While there may be some loss due to infrastructure conflicts or poor health, the objective will be to minimize tree damage through strategic design. Analysis and Options: Existing site conditions within the project limits were determined through a review of background information and pre-engineering investigations, including topographic surveys and site reconnaissance. Road Classification = Collector Speed Limits: • • Ambient speed limit 50 km/h School Zone (16 th St. West to 19 th St. West) 30km/h School Days from 8 am to 5 pm The lane widths are not symmetrical. • • Average Lane Width Northbound = 3.5 m Average Lane Width Southbound = 5.0 m (on-street parking) No designated bicycle lanes / active transportation routes 1.5m wide sidewalks (majority) on both sides of the road Design Challenges The presence of hydroelectric and streetlight poles, fire hydrants, telecommunications vaults and pedestals, mature trees, and private structures (e.g., retaining walls, gardens, fences, buildings) adjacent to both sides of the road complicates the introduction of a multi-use path and the relocation of sidewalks. Coordination and consultation with utilities will be required to ensure that required utility relocations are completed with minimal impact; preferred implementation to occur before any conflicting municipal infrastructure work. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 3 of 12 Page 80 of 126 Page 81 of 126 Traffic accommodation, construction methods, and phasing are designed to ensure that resident access is maintained and to minimize impacts on the travelling public. In some locations, the grade changes significantly; to avoid retaining walls, tree removal and grading on private property may be required to address these concerns. Balancing municipal responsibility for managing overland flow and floodways within the road allowance with efforts to mitigate private on-site ponding areas within a fiscally responsible strategy. The County’s Active Transportation Plan and the City’s Official Plan reflect an active transportation route along Eddie Sargent Parkway. Staff have requested that the consultant assess this corridor as a potential substitute for that active transportation route, given its complementary uses (school, residential area) and a dual-prong approach that uses the space for traffic calming while providing a more comfortable route for active transportation participants (i.e., not on a minor highway). Potential Cross-Section Options: • • • • Option 1: Reconstruction to Existing Road Cross Section and Rightof-Way Layout Option 2: Reconstruction using City of Owen Sound Typical Cross Section for a Collector Road (3.5m Lane Width, No Parking, add two 1.5m wide Bicycle Lanes) Option 3: Reconstruction using 3.5m Lane Width, No Parking or Bicycle Lanes, add a New Multi-Use Path Option 4: Reconstruction using 4.25m Lane Width, No Parking or Bicycle Lanes, add a New Multi-Use Path Pros-and-Cons Option 1 Option 1 Advantages: • • • Sidewalks and curb ramps would be reconstructed to City and AODA standards as much as possible. Less disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc., compared to other options. Lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction schedule compared to other options. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 4 of 12 Page 81 of 126 Page 82 of 126 Option 1 Disadvantages: • • • • Does not address safety and efficiency concerns for bicycle use. Does not address road parking concerns. Does not address speeding; traffic speed can be expected to increase with wide pavement (unless on-street parking is substantially occupied) and a smooth surface. Does not fully address sidewalk relocation to remove the curb face sidewalk (winter operations and safety considerations). Option 2 Reconstruction according to the City of Owen Sound Typical Collector Road Cross Section (3.5m Travelled Lanes, No Parking, adding Bicycle Lanes) Option 2 Advantages: • • • • • • Sidewalks and curb ramps would be reconstructed to City and AODA standards as much as possible. Reduction in travel lane width and adjusted centre line of road supports traffic calming and safety. Delineated bicycle lanes provide added safety and efficiency. No on-street parking promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety through fewer obstructions (including road snow plowing), provides better visibility, aesthetics (cleaner appearance), and increases safety at intersections and crosswalks. Eliminates the potential for people to cross the road between parked vehicles. Potentially lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction schedule compared to Options 3 and 4. Option 2 Disadvantages: • • • • Lack of physical barrier between bicycle lanes and potential for onroad parking still. If a barrier were added, it would increase operational complexity and costs. Bicycle lanes may need to be closed in winter if snow removal cannot be accomplished efficiently. Transition of bicycle lanes to adjacent streets may be challenging. Higher disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc., compared to Option 1. Increased impervious area (road width) resulting in additional storm water runoff and potential management upgrades required. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 5 of 12 Page 82 of 126 Page 83 of 126 • • Higher reconstruction cost and longer reconstruction schedule compared to Option 1. In winter, the Traffic calming effect may be limited as bicycle lane line painting will often be covered with snow. Option 3 Reconstruction using 3.5m travelled road Lane Width, No Parking or Bicycle Lanes, adding a New Multi-Use Path. Option 3 Advantages: • • • • • • Sidewalks and curb ramps would be reconstructed to City and AODA standards as much as possible. Reduction in travel lane width and adjusted centre line of road supports traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and reductions in on road parking. The addition of a multi-use path enables separation of active transportation from vehicular traffic. The path provides a shared travel surface for people on foot and on wheels, efficiently using land, and addressing safety concerns. Multi-use path presents comparable snow clearing effort to an equivalent length of sidewalk, when providing a winter service level of 1.5m of maintained width. Path can be maintained year-round. No on-street parking promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety through fewer obstructions (including road snow plowing), provides better visibility, aesthetics (cleaner appearance), and increases safety at intersections and crosswalks Lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction schedule compared to Option 4. Option 3 Disadvantages: • • • Higher likelihood of conflicts with existing trees, poles, etc., compared to Options 1 and 2. Increased potential conflicts with existing private property infrastructure located within the City’s right-of-way, particularly where the homes are located immediately adjacent to the property line. To achieve a path with a minimal sideslope, grading and tie-in to the existing elevations along the property line may be difficult Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 6 of 12 Page 83 of 126 Page 84 of 126 • • • • without retaining walls or grading onto private property, especially on the West side. Increased impervious area (multi-use path) resulting in additional stormwater runoff and potential management upgrades. People on motorized vehicles could abuse the multi-use path. Higher reconstruction cost compared to Option 1, and potentially higher construction cost compared to Option 2. Longer reconstruction schedule compared to Options 1 and 2. Option 4 Option 4 is essentially Option 3, but with wider travelled road lanes. Reconstruction using 4.25m Lane Width, No Parking or Bicycle Lanes, with New Multi-Use Path. Option 4 Advantages: • • • • Sidewalks and curb ramps would be reconstructed to City and AODA standards as much as possible. Relocating the centreline to create a symmetrical road platform improves road geometry. The multi-use path separates active transportation from vehicular travel, increasing comfort, safety and accessibility. No on-street parking promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety by reducing obstructions (including more efficient snow plowing), improves visibility and aesthetics (a cleaner appearance), increases safety at intersections and crosswalks, and eliminates the potential for pedestrians to cross the road between parked vehicles. Option 4 Disadvantages: • • • Travel lanes are wider than in Option 3, so traffic calming due to visual cues is minimal. Highest conflict with existing trees, resulting in the most tree removal and replanting cost. Increased potential conflicts with existing private structures located within the City’s right-of-way, as the new infrastructure will consume all available space within the road allowance. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 7 of 12 Page 84 of 126 Page 85 of 126 • • • • • More challenging grading and tie-in to properties, specifically on the West side, compared to Option 3. To avoid retaining walls, grading onto private property is likely required. Increased impervious area (multi-use path) resulting in additional storm water runoff and potential management upgrades. People using motorized vehicles could abuse the multi-use path, requiring increased enforcement. Higher reconstruction cost compared to Options 1 and 3. Longest reconstruction schedule of all four of the presented options. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources Options 1, 3 and 4 represent a more-or-less equal operational cost for longterm maintenance, assuming that the multi-use path options are maintained to the City’s current accepted standard of 1.5m of maintained width during Winter Control. Due to the addition of Bicycle Lanes, Option 2 changes the long -term operational cost, depending on how the City ultimately chooses to maintain bicycle infrastructure in winter. It is common in many urban jurisdictions now for bicycle lanes to be winter-maintained; however, that is not the City’s current level of service. There may also be additional costs if a physical barrier between the bike lane and the vehicular lane is included, due to more difficult access to the bike lane, potential multiple snow removals, and/or seasonal removal and reinstallation of the barriers/delineators. The end-of-life/disposal costs for each option would be proportional to the initial construction cost. Human Resources As this is an existing roadway, maintenance activities are already included in the operational programs of both Public Works and the Parks and Open Spaces divisions. Examples of these activities include tree trimming/removal, sweeping, and winter snow removal. Specifically for street trees, once the tree work is completed as part of this project, little maintenance will be required for very mature trees for several years, as any potentially weak limbs or diseased trees will be removed before construction. Removed trees will be replaced with tree species wellStaff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 8 of 12 Page 85 of 126 Page 86 of 126 suited to the boulevard environment. Lastly, wherever possible, replacement trees will be offered for planting on private property, restoring the tree canopy without increasing the City’s liability or long-term operational costs. The construction and contract administration of this project can be managed with existing staff resources, with support from the consultant and the future contractor to be procured through a competitive bidding process. Time and Scheduling Tasks Completed: • • • • • • • Topographic Survey and Site Reconnaissance, including Tree Inventory Geotechnical Investigation and Soil Analysis Private Utility Locates Requested and Received Existing Conditions Plans Alternative Cross-Section Drawings Public Information Centre #1: February 3 rd, 2026 Discussion at Operations Committee: February 19 th, 2026 Proposed Project Timeline: Due to its size and complexity, a pre-qualification bid has been added to the procurement process. • • • • • Preparation of 60% Design: February to March 2026 Contractor Prequalification and Award: March to April 2026 Public Information Centre #2 –60% Design: March 19, 2026 (tentative) Complete 100% Design and Tender Award: April to June 2026 Construction Phase 1: July/August to November 2026 Technology and Infrastructure As discussed, depending on the solutions selected for construction, changes may be needed to the City’s operations, service levels, and equipment. However, even if the proposed option could trigger a higher level of service or require specialized equipment, it could be possible to establish a reduced level of service in the short to medium term, i.e., until such infrastructure becomes more common within the City. An example of this would be bicycle lanes. Currently, bicycle lanes receive the same treatment as the overall road (they are just plowed as part of the Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 9 of 12 Page 86 of 126 Page 87 of 126 road). Although the Minimum Maintenance Standards require a slightly less rigorous standard for bike lanes within a particular road classification, as the bicycle lane is contiguous and undivided from the vehicular lanes, it is all plowed at the same time. The bicycle lanes could initially be undivided, in the typical configuration, with no additional maintenance burden. In the future, a barrier could be added, at which time a decision must be made whether to remove the barrier in winter or to procure suitable equipment and develop a procedure for clearing the snow to meet the Minimum Maintenance Standards. A final option is to close the bicycle lanes seasonally; however, this is counterproductive to enabling citizens to use active transportation year-round. There is more flexibility with the multi-use path. Currently, City Council has recognized a level of service for these paths that equates to one pass with the sidewalk plow. This reduces the winter-maintained width from 3m to 1.5m. This was determined to be adequate based on usage demand (paths are typically used slightly less in winter than in other months), and it also provides some unmaintained width for those who wish to pull a toboggan, cross-country ski, or snowshoe. Climate and Environmental Impacts: The recommendation supports the City's Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan. While the construction of the proposed infrastructure will generate carbon emissions, a smoother driving surface and reduced speeds will reduce fuel consumption, and the enhancement of active transportation within the corridor will encourage greener modes of transportation and active outdoor living. Tree preservation and replanting will maintain or enhance the urban canopy, providing shade and relief from heat and sun, which in turn may reduce dependence on air conditioning use in the area. Storm sewers and other infrastructure systems will be sized appropriately to account for the effects of climate change (i.e. less frequent, more intense storms). Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 10 of 12 Page 87 of 126 Page 88 of 126 Communication and Engagement: This project places strong emphasis on communication, given the area's cultural and historical significance. It was made clear during the procurement process and at the startup meeting that community engagement would be a key component of the project. The consultant on this project is WSP of Owen Sound, which has assigned two of its most senior staff members. On the City side, a project team approach has been implemented to ensure the smooth delivery of design, contract administration, and construction. Staff employed an innovative approach to public engagement on this project. Instead of having a Public Information Centre (PIC) at City Hall before a regular Operations Committee Meeting, a dedicated date and time were set to hold a PIC within the project area, with the aim that it would attract more interest and be more convenient for the affected residents, thereby ensuring as much public input as possible. The PIC was held at First United Church (4th Ave W at 21 st St W) on February 3rd, 2026, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. The PIC was well attended, with most attendees walking to the venue despite the wintry weather. A second PIC is planned for March, and input is being solicited from the Operations Committee and Council. The timing of the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee may not be ideal for gathering input early in the project; however, the design will be based on the most current Accessibility Standards. The Communications team is supporting the project through media releases, assistance with publications such as newsletters and notices, and the use of the City’s “Our City” public engagement platform. Report Developed in Consultation With: Project Team: Mason Bellamy, Ashley McNeil, Sofin Lalani Project Consultant: WSP Attachments: 1. Attachment 1 - Project Limits Map 2. Attachment 2 - PIC Tableaux by WSP Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 11 of 12 Page 88 of 126 Page 89 of 126 Submitted by: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering at lwiddifield@owensound.ca or 519-3761440 ext. 1201. Staff Report OP-26-012: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Page 12 of 12 Page 89 of 126 Page 90 of 126 Attachment 1: Project Limits Page 90 of 126 Page 91 of 126 4th Avenue West Reconstruction – 15th Street West to 20th Street West City of Owen Sound Public Information Centre #1 February 03, 2026 Page 91 of 126 Page 92 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Introduction The City of Owen Sound (City) has engaged the services of WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) to complete detailed design for the reconstruction of the following streets and avenues within the City: 2 • 4th Ave. West, from 15th St. West to 20th St. West (Approx. 775 m) • 16th St. West, from 4th Ave. West to 5th Ave. West (Approx. 145 m) • 17th St. West, from 3rd Ave. West to 5th Ave. West (Approx. 250 m) The City wishes to reconstruct these road sections that are in poor condition while considering improvements for road user, bicycle and pedestrian safety. Existing underground infrastructure (sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer) in these corridors will also be replaced, as they have reached the end of service of their lives. The proposed design will also aim to improve above-ground infrastructure (pavement, sidewalks, curb and gutter, signage, etc.), address localized flooding concerns, improve transportation facilities, ensure accessibility and enhance the boulevard streetscapes. Page 92 of 126 Page 93 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Project Status Tasks Completed: 1. Topographic Survey and Site Reconnaissance including Tree Inventory 2. Geotechnical Investigation and Soil Analysis 3. Private Utility Locates Requested and Received 4. Existing Conditions Plans 5. Alternative Cross-Section Drawings 3 Next Steps / Timelines: 1. Public Information Center #1 - TODAY 2. Preparation of 60% Design – February to March 2026 3. Contractors Prequalification and Award – March to April 2026 4. Public Information Center #2 – 60% Design – March 19, 2026 5. Complete 100% Design and Tender Award – April to June 2026 6. Construction Phase 1 – July/August to November 2026 Page 93 of 126 Page 94 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Existing Conditions Existing site conditions throughout the project limits were determined through review of background information and pre-engineering investigations including topographic surveys, and site reconnaissance. Key information/data gathered for 4th Ave. West is listed below: • Road Classification = Collector • Posted/Assumed Speed Limits: ➢ School Zone (16th St. West to 19th St. West): o School Days from 8am to 5pm = 30km/h o Non-School Hours = 50km/h ➢ Outside School Zone = 50km/h • Average Lane Widths: • Northbound = 3.5 m • Southbound = 5.0 m (on-road parking) • No designated bicycle lanes / active transportation routes • 1.5m wide sidewalks (majority) on both sides of the road 4 Page 94 of 126 Page 95 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Desired Conditions 5 • Design of new pavement structures suitable for existing traffic, and through reviewing existing subsurface soil conditions. • Implement revised road cross-sections to support improvement of transportation facilities and accessibility, while taking into consideration existing site constraints, City standards, and minimizing impact to adjacent properties. • Improvement of above ground and below ground infrastructure to address localized flooding concerns and replacement of aging watermain, sanitary and storm sewers. • Consideration for the introduction of enhanced pedestrian facilities (sidewalks, crosswalks, multiuse paths, etc.) to improve user safety. • Review and recommendation for improvements to the existing streetlighting system (as required). Challenges and Concerns • The presence of utility and lighting poles, hydrants, cable pedestals, mature trees and private structures in proximity to both sides of the road complicates the introduction of a multi-use path, relocation of sidewalks, etc. • Coordination and consultation with utilities to ensure that required utility relocations are completed with minimal impacts, with preferred implantation occurring prior to any conflicting municipal infrastructure work. • Traffic staging, construction methods and staging to ensure access for local residents is maintained, and impacts to the travelling public are minimized. Page 95 of 126 Page 96 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Road Cross Section Options – 4th Avenue West 6 • Option 1: Reconstruction to Existing Road Cross Section and Right-ofWay Layout • Option 2: Reconstruction using City of Owen Sound Typical Cross Section - 3.5m Lane Width - No Parking with Bicycle Lanes • Option 3: Reconstruction using 3.5m Lane Width - No Parking or Bicycle Lanes with New Multi-Use Path • Option 4: Reconstruction using 4.25m Lane Width - No Parking or Bicycle Lanes with New Multi-Use Path Query: What is a multi-use path? A multi-use path or shared path is a paved, off-road facility designed for various non-motorized users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, etc. The path is physically separated from roads and vehicle traffic within open spaces to ensure safety. Page 96 of 126 Page 97 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Option 1 – Reconstruction to Existing Road Cross Section and Right-of-Way Layout 7 Advantages: ✓ ✓ ✓ Disadvantages: o Sidewalks and curb ramps reconstructed to City / AODA standards. o Less disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc. o compared to other options. Lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction schedule compared to other options. Page 97 of 126 Does not address safety and efficiency concerns for bicycle use. Does not address road parking concerns. Does not fully address sidewalk relocation to remove curb face sidewalk. Page 98 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Option 2 – Reconstruction to City of Owen Sound Typical Cross Section: 3.5m Lanes - No Parking w/ Bicycle Lanes 8 Advantages: ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Reduction in travel lane width and adjusted centre line of road supports traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and reduction in on-road parking. Delineated bicycle lanes provide added safety and efficiency. No parking on road promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety through less obstructions (including road snow plowing), provides better visibility, aesthetics (cleaner appearance), and increases safety at intersections and crosswalks. Potentially lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction Page 98 of 126 schedule compared to Option 3 and 4. Disadvantages: o o o o o Lack of physical barrier between bicycle lanes and potential for on-road parking still. Transition of bicycle lanes to adjacent streets may be challenging. Higher disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc. compared to other Option 1. Increased impervious area (road width) resulting in additional storm water runoff and potential management upgrades required. Higher reconstruction cost and longer reconstruction schedule compared to Option 1. Page 99 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Option 3 – Reconstruction using 3.5m Lane Width - No Parking or Bicycle Lanes with New Multi-Use Path 9 Advantages: Disadvantages: ✓ o o ✓ ✓ ✓ Reduction in travel lane width and adjusted centre line of road supports traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and reductions in on-road parking. Addition of multi-use path provides for separation of bicycle lanes from road, providing a combined travel surface for use with pedestrians, to address safety and efficiency concerns. No parking on road promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety through less obstructions (including road snow plowing), provides better visibility, aesthetics (cleaner appearance), and increases safety at intersections and crosswalks Lower reconstruction cost and shorter reconstruction Page schedule 99 of 126 compared to Option 4. o o o o o Higher disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc., compared to Option 1 and 2. Increased potential conflicts with existing private property infrastructure located within the City’s right-of-way. More challenging grading and tie-in to properties, specifically on the West side. Increased impervious area (multi-use path) resulting in additional storm water runoff and potential management upgrades. Addition of multi-use path on East side could promote use by motorized vehicles, etc. Higher reconstruction cost compared to Option 1, and potentially higher construction cost compared to Option 2. Longer reconstruction schedule compared to Option 1 and 2. Page 100 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Option 4 – Reconstruction using 4.25m Lane Width - No Parking or Bicycle Lanes with New Multi-Use Path 10 Advantages: Disadvantages: ✓ o ✓ ✓ Adjusted centre line of road supports traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and reductions in on-road parking. Addition of multi-use path provides for separation of bicycle lanes from road, providing a combined travel surface for use with pedestrians, to address safety and efficiency concerns. No parking on road promotes improved traffic flow (reduced congestion), enhances safety through less obstructions (including road snow plowing), provides better visibility, aesthetics (cleaner appearance), and increases safety at intersections and crosswalks o o o o o Page 100 of 126 o o Travel lanes are wider compared to Option 3, not fully addressing traffic calming and enhanced pedestrian safety. Higher disturbance to existing trees, poles, etc., compared to Option 1, 2 and 3. Increased potential conflicts with existing private property infrastructure located within the City’s right-of-way. More challengingly grading and tie-in to properties, specifically on the West side, compared to Option 3. Increased impervious area (multi-use path) resulting in additional storm water runoff and potential management upgrades. Addition of multi-use path on East side could promote use by motorized vehicles, etc. Higher reconstruction cost compared to Option 1 and 3. Longer reconstruction schedule compared to Option 1, 2 and 3. Page 101 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Potential Conflicts – 15th Street West to 16th Street West 11 Page 101 of 126 Page 102 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Potential Conflicts – 16th Street West to 17th Street West 12 Page 102 of 126 Page 103 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Potential Conflicts – 17th Street West to 18th Street West 13 Page 103 of 126 Page 104 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Potential Conflicts – 18th Street West to 19th Street West 14 Page 104 of 126 Page 105 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Potential Conflicts – 19th Street West to 20th Street West 15 Page 105 of 126 Page 106 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Additional Considerations For all Cross Section options presented, additional considerations for Traffic Calming are discussed below. Calming Measure Additional Considerations Removable Speed Humps • • • • • 16 Manufactured from durable recycled rubber. Bolted into the pavement in the spring and unbolted and stored during the late fall. Can be a safety concern for bicycles and motorcycles. Can be a concern for larger trucks, transit drivers, emergency response, etc. Yearly installation, removal and maintenance will increase manhours and costs Speed Tables • Flat-topped speed hump, several meters wide. • Less physical effects to traffic driving over compared to short speed humps (more tolerable for drivers, larger vehicles and emergency response). • Greater capital cost to implement then short speed humps. Signage • Reduce posted speed to 40 km/h (from 50 km/h) • Install other signs with specific wording to focus on changing driver behaviors. • Implement additional pedestrian warning signage - increase motorist awareness of the potential for pedestrian conflict. • Enhancement of 30 km/h signs and notification of school zone in the vicinity of the Timothy Christian School. • Potential for electrified speed display signs providing real time speed of approaching vehicles and warning of speed limit exceedance. Curb Extensions • Curb extensions are typically at intersections or mid-block (between intersections). • Affect driver’s perception of the road, compelling them to drive more carefully through the Page 106 ofwidth 126 of the travel lane. reduction of visible/physical Page 107 of 126 4th Ave. West Reconstruction – 15th Street to 20th Street Public Information Centre #1 – February 03, 2026 Immediate Next Steps 17 • Mid February 2026 - Receive and review public comments. • End of February 2026 - Select the preferred Cross Section option for 4th Avene West and proceed into 60% design. • March 19, 2026 - Public Information Center #2 Stay Engaged! If you have any questions or comments, please fill out a comment sheet today or submit your comments by February 17, 2026, to: Chris Wilson, P.Eng., Consultant Project Manager, WSP Email: chris.Wilson@wsp.com Page 107 of 126 Page 108 of 126 Thank you! wsp.com Page 108 of 126 Page 109 of 126 Staff Report Report To: Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee Report From: Sofin Lalani, Engineering Technologist Meeting Date: April 2, 2026 Report Code: OP-26-013 Subject: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-013 respecting the 16th Street East pedestrian tunnel rehabilitation and sidewalk expansion, the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee receives the report for information purpose. Highlights: • • • • • The City is rehabilitating the 16th Street East pedestrian tunnel and constructing a new sidewalk along 16 th Street East to improve connectivity to upcoming developments in the area. Feedback from the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee will inform the design and ensure accessibility standards are met. A Public Information Centre (PIC) was held on February 19, 2026, at City Hall to gather public input on the project scope and improvements. Key considerations include structural repairs, enhanced waterproofing, tunnel lighting, embankment widening, and integration with future roadway and active transportation plans. The project supports climate resilience, encourages active transportation, and is being delivered using existing City resources and standard construction practices. Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 1 of 6 Page 109 of 126 Page 110 of 126 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: Safe City – Contributing to inclusivity and accessibility in our community and participating in initiatives focused on a range of long term, systemic safety solutions that respond to current and future residents. Previous Report/Authority: This Project has been approved as part of the Capital Program, Project 24P.6. Background: The City has retained Pearson Engineering Ltd. to complete the detailed design for the rehabilitation of the existing pedestrian tunnel and sidewalk extension located on 16th Street East (Hwy. 26), approximately 450 metres west of 28th Avenue East (Hwy. 5). Constructed in 2005, the structure consists of a precast concrete box culvert with a clear span of 4.0 metres and an overall length of 41.0 metres. The tunnel currently serves as a key pedestrian connection within the Tom Thomson Trail System. The structure is presently experiencing water infiltration at the precast concrete joints. During winter months, this infiltration results in ice accumulation and the formation of icicles at the soffit, creating a potential safety hazard for users. Ongoing moisture exposure has also led to localized delamination and spalling of the soffit and wall surfaces. In addition to addressing the immediate structural and safety concerns, the project must consider anticipated growth in the surrounding area. Planning documents indicate that the lands adjacent to the project site are entering a significant growth phase over the next ten years. Proposed residential developments, commercial buildings, and a new high school along 16th Street East and 8th Street East will increase demand on the roadway network, municipal services, and the recreational trail system. Accordingly, Pearson Engineering Ltd., in collaboration with City staff, has developed a preliminary sidewalk extension design within the project limits. This design defines future roadway requirements and ensures that the proposed rehabilitation work is compatible with planned long-term improvements. Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 2 of 6 Page 110 of 126 Page 111 of 126 Analysis and Options: A detailed review of background information and pre-engineering investigations, including topographic surveys and site reconnaissance, was conducted to assess conditions within the project limits. Proposed Rehabilitation Measures The recommended approach involves comprehensive measures to address structural deficiencies, improve safety, and support future roadway improvements. Key components include: 1. Structural and Tunnel Improvements: • Install a cast-in-place concrete distribution slab over the tunnel to protect the precast box culvert and tie segments together. Apply a waterproofing membrane over the distribution slab. Repair all deteriorated concrete areas within the tunnel. Install tunnel lighting, remove graffiti, and replace damaged hazard signage. • • • 2. Roadway and Embankment Improvements: • Construct new retaining walls at the south end of the tunnel to support roadway widening. Widen the south roadway embankment to accommodate a new 1,500 mm wide AODA compliant sidewalk. Install a new curb, grass boulevard, and steel beam guiderail adjacent to the sidewalk. Stabilize embankments with rock protection to prevent erosion. Replace approximately 400 metres of asphalt roadway on the south side. • • • • Benefits: • • • • • • Addresses current water infiltration and structural deterioration; Improves pedestrian and roadway safety; Integrates current rehabilitation with future roadway widening and active transportation improvements; Designs adhere to the AODA and Integrated Accessibility Standards for the Design of Public Space Extends the service life of the structure and minimizes long -term maintenance costs. Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 3 of 6 Page 111 of 126 Page 112 of 126 Resource Alignment: Human Resources The construction and contract administration of this project can be managed with existing staff resources, with support from the retained consultant, Pearson Engineering Ltd., and a contractor to be procured through a competitive bidding process. Time and Scheduling Tasks Completed: • • • • • Topographic Survey and Site Reconnaissance Geotechnical Investigation and Soil Analysis Private Utility Locates Requested and Received Existing Conditions Plans Alternative Cross-Section Drawings Proposed Project Timeline: • • • Preparation of 90% Design: March 2026 Complete 100% Design and Tender Award: April to May 2026 Construction: May to August 2026 Technology and Infrastructure The project uses standard construction practices with no need for new technology, equipment, or service changes. Minor upgrades will be handled through existing maintenance programs, with no added complexity. Climate and Environmental Impacts: The proposed works support the City’s Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan by improving the resilience and durability of existing infrastructure. The rehabilitation measures, particularly enhanced waterproofing within the pedestrian tunnel, are intended to mitigate the impacts of freeze-thaw cycles and more intense precipitation events. While construction activities will result in temporary greenhouse gas emissions, the project prioritizes the renewal of existing infrastructure rather than full replacement, thereby reducing overall material consumption and associated environmental impacts. Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 4 of 6 Page 112 of 126 Page 113 of 126 The addition of a new sidewalk connection will enhance pedestrian connectivity within the corridor and support active transportation, encouraging walking as a sustainable mode of travel. Infrastructure components will be designed to accommodate projected climate conditions, including increased precipitation intensity, to ensure long term performance and reduce the risk of future deterioration. The recommendation supports the City's Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Communication and Engagement: This project places a strong emphasis on communication to ensure residents and stakeholders are informed about the rehabilitation and sidewalk extension work. Pearson Engineering Ltd. has been retained as the project consultant and is working closely with City staff to support engagement and project delivery. A Public Information Centre (PIC) was held on February 19, 2026, from 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at City Hall. The event provided an opportunity for residents and stakeholders to review the project scope, ask questions, and provide input. This PIC is the primary public engagement event for the project. The Communications team is supporting the project through media releases, notices, and the City’s “Our City” public engagement platform to ensure timely updates and broad accessibility of project information. All design decisions will follow current accessibility standards, ensuring that the rehabilitated tunnel and new sidewalk meet inclusive design requirements. Report Developed in Consultation With: Project Team: Lara Widdifield, Mason Bellamy Project Consultant: Pearson Engineering Attachments: Design Drawings (60% Complete) Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 5 of 6 Page 113 of 126 Page 114 of 126 Submitted by: Sofin Lalani, Engineering Technologist Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Sofin Lalani, Engineering Technologist at sofinlalani@owensound.ca. Staff Report OP-26-013: 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Expansion Page 6 of 6 Page 114 of 126 Page 115 of 126 16th STREET EAST PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL REHABILITATION & SIDEWALK EXPANSION CITY OF OWEN SOUND RFT 2026-xx Drawing List ND-1 ND-2 SP-1 SP-2 WI-1 GA-1 PP-1 PP-2 PP-3 PP-4 RC-1 - SITE NOTES AND DETAILS 1 NOTES AND DETAILS 2 EXISTING SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND REMOVALS CONCEPTUAL WORKSITE ISOLATION PLAN GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE 1 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE 2 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE 3 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE 4 PROPOSED ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 CITY OF OWEN SOUND 808 2nd AVENUE EAST, OWEN SOUND, ON, N4K 2H4 Pearson Engineering LTD. 1450 1st Avenue West, Unit #101 Owen Sound, ON, N4K 6W2 Page 115 of 126 Page 116 of 126 · · “ ” SINGLE LANE STAGED TRAFFIC ONLY SITE ³ ³ DETOUR ROUTE DETOUR PLAN N.T.S. PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 116 of 126 Page 117 of 126 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 117 of 126 Page 118 of 126 SITE KEY PLAN N.T.S. EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE= 1:500 EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION SCALE= 1:75 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 118 of 126 Page 119 of 126 SITE KEY PLAN N.T.S. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE= 1:500 PROPOSED ROADWAY SECTION SCALE= 1:75 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 119 of 126 Page 120 of 126 CONCEPTUAL WORKSITE ISOLATION PLAN - STAGE 1 CONCEPTUAL WORKSITE ISOLATION PLAN - STAGE 2 SCALE= 1:250 SCALE= 1:250 CONCEPTUAL WORKSITE ISOLATION SECTION - STAGE 1 SCALE= 1:75 CONCEPTUAL WORKSITE ISOLATION SECTION - STAGE 2 16th STREET EAST PROFILE SCALE= 1:75 SCALE= 1:75 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 120 of 126 Page 121 of 126 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION SCALE= 1:100 PLAN VIEW SCALE= 1:150 EXISTING TUNNEL WITH PROPOSED WORK- CROSS SECTION PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE= 1:100 SCALE= 1:100 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 121 of 126 Page 122 of 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN - STA. 0+000 - 0+100 SCALE= 1:150 PROPOSED ROADWAY PROFILE - STA. 0+000 - 0+100 SCALE= 1:150 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 122 of 126 Page 123 of 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN - STA. 0+100 - 0+200 SCALE= 1:150 PROPOSED ROADWAY PROFILE - STA. 0+100 - 0+200 SCALE= 1:150 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 123 of 126 Page 124 of 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN - STA. 0+200 - 0+300 SCALE= 1:150 PROPOSED ROADWAY PROFILE - STA. 0+200 - 0+300 SCALE= 1:150 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 124 of 126 Page 125 of 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN - STA. 0+300 - 0+400 SCALE= 1:150 PROPOSED ROADWAY PROFILE - STA. 0+300 - 0+400 SCALE= 1:150 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 125 of 126 Page 126 of 126 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+060 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+220 SCALE= 1:200 SCALE= 1:200 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+100 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+260 SCALE= 1:200 SCALE= 1:200 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+140 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+300 SCALE= 1:200 SCALE= 1:200 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+180 ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION STA. 0+340 SCALE= 1:200 SCALE= 1:200 PEARSON ENGINEERING PEARSONENG.COM PH. 705.719.4785 Page 126 of 126