Council Meeting - Regular Agenda Preview — April 27, 2026

Hook: Patio Permit By-law Glowup Beauty Nail Grey County

Owen Sound · Council Meeting - Regular · April 27, 2026

Summary

One-sentence summary: Council convenes April 27, 2026 at 5:30 PM to review a patio permit by-law establishing a licensing framework for street furniture and sidewalk patios on public lands. The by-law defines specific patio configurations and mandates permits issued by the Director of Community Services, with provisions for refusal, suspension, or revocation if health, safety, or accessibility standards are compromised. Concurrently, the agenda includes a report on Bill 98, which proposes standardizing official plans and setting provincial minimum lot sizes. Staff note that the bill seeks to prohibit mandatory municipal green building standards outside of health or safety requirements and will address public sector ownership in water corporations. Council will also consider amendments to the Environmental Assessment Act and concerns regarding proposed regional consolidation of Conservation Authorities, including a call for supportive policy guidance rather than prohibitions on green development solutions. Finally, the agenda covers the finalization of business licence approvals for GlowUp Beauty, Good Neighbour Resale, and Rowan's Roost, alongside safety requirements for roadside barriers on curb lane patios.

Council will consider the Patio Permit By-law, which establishes a licensing framework for street furniture and sidewalk patios on public lands within the City of Owen Sound to enhance pedestrian-friendly environments while ensuring safety and accessibility. Staff will present this legislation defining specific patio configurations and outlining strict application procedures, including site plans and fees, to ensure commercial uses do not negatively impact the streetscape. Discussion will also cover Bill 98, where staff argue that standardizing official plans and prohibiting mandatory municipal green building standards outside health or safety requirements undermines local flexibility and imposes costly updates on smaller municipalities. The agenda includes final approvals for business licences for GlowUp Beauty and Good Neighbour Resale, alongside considerations of safety requirements mandating TL-1 MASH tested concrete jersey barriers for curb lane patios. Furthermore, Council will review the Protecting Ontario's Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026, which proposes amendments to the Environmental Assessment Act, alongside a Source Protection Committee's deep concerns regarding the proposed regional consolidation of Conservation Authorities. Council will deliberate on retaining local watershed-based planning to uphold recommendations of Justice O'Connor's Walkerton Inquiry report and ensure local accountability for drinking water source protection.

Top Newsworthy Developments

11.b Report CS-26-031 from the Senior Planner Re: Patio Permit By-law This by-law establishes a licensing framework for street furniture and sidewalk patios on public lands within the City of Owen Sound, aiming to enhance pedestrian-friendly environments while ensuring safety and accessibility. It defines specific patio types, including frontage, curbside, and curb lane configurations, and mandates that all operations require a permit issued by the Director of Community Services. The legislation outlines strict application procedures, including site plans and fees, alongside provisions for permit refusal, suspension, or revocation if health, safety, or accessibility standards are compromised. Furthermore, the by-law details operational requirements, inspection protocols, and penalties for non-compliance, ensuring that commercial uses do not negatively impact the streetscape or public well-being.
11.a Report CS-26-030 from the Manager of Planning and Heritage Re: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, Bill 98 proposes standardizing official plans and prohibiting mandatory municipal green building standards outside of health or safety requirements, which staff argue undermines local flexibility and imposes costly updates on smaller municipalities. The legislation also seeks to set provincial minimum lot sizes and facilitate electronic submissions, though staff warn that technology changes not aligned with existing tools like Cloudpermit will be disruptive. Additionally, the report addresses public sector ownership in water corporations and communal system consents, while calling for supportive policy guidance rather than prohibitions on green development solutions.
11.c Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences: The section addresses the procedural finalization of business licence approvals, noting that while fines are being considered to deter non-compliance, they are intended as a last resort after cooperative efforts with operators. A significant portion of the text details the safety requirements for roadside barriers, mandating TL-1 MASH tested concrete jersey barriers for curb lane patios to protect patrons from errant vehicles, with costs falling on the operator. The by-law also streamlines the renewal process for existing patios by reducing administrative burdens and fees, while delegating approval authority to senior management to ensure a balanced review from both Community Services and Public Works divisions.
11.d • GlowUp Beauty, anail and eye lash studio located at 968 2nd Avenue West • Good Neighbour Resale, agrocery store for dry... Ontario introduced the Protecting Ontario’s Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026, proposing amendments to the Environmental Assessment Act to streamline the comprehensive EA process by removing requirements for Ministry Review publication, public hearings before the Ontario Land Tribunal, and Cabinet approval for Ministerial decisions. Concurrently, the Ontario Energy Board extended the deadline for municipalities to apply for intervenor status in a generic proceeding regarding the Model Franchise Agreement to May 1, 2026, acknowledging challenges posed by the upcoming municipal election cycle. Additionally, a Source Protection Committee expressed deep concerns regarding proposed regional consolidation of Conservation Authorities, advocating for the retention of local watershed-based planning to uphold the recommendations of Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report and ensure local accountability for drinking water source protection.
21 BY-LAWS The agenda item authorizes a series of by-laws to confirm council proceedings, establish fees for waste disposal, and adopt a new tax policy. It further regulates street furniture and patios, repeals specific order sections, and authorizes agreements for fire fighter collective bargaining, street sweeping, and provincial funding for transportation and court security.
11 Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council CONSENT AGENDA The Deputy Mayor presented a consent agenda covering planning reports on the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act and a patio permit by-law. Final approvals were issued for business licences for GlowUp Beauty, Good Neighbour Resale, and Rowan's Roost, alongside city hall illumination requests.
7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS The agenda item covers deputations and presentations, specifically featuring an update from the Acting City Manager regarding Corporate Services.
13 Ontario Medical Association for Doctors' Day Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL Council postponed a resolution regarding research into art gallery operating models until a future service review report is available.

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction: Owen Sound
Body: Council Meeting - Regular
Date: April 27, 2026
Transcript Status: Agenda package summary and extracted subreport text
Transcript URL: https://helpos.ca/transcripts/owen-sound/council-meeting-regular/2026-04-27
Official Source: View official meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This page is an accessibility-focused summary and extracted agenda text intended to promote civic accessibility.

It is an unofficial convenience copy and may contain extraction or summarization errors.

For the authoritative record, try to access the original source materials from Owen Sound using the original link below.

Original meeting link

Full Transcript

2 CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

This section serves as a procedural placeholder inviting the assembly to propose new items for discussion.

2 CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

The agenda item addresses declarations of interest, a procedural step ensuring transparency before further deliberations.

3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

4 CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES

The council formally confirmed the accuracy of its previous meeting minutes.

4 CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES

CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES

4.a Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on March 23, 2026

Residents voiced concerns regarding building permit enforcement and encampments while advocating for safer bicycle infrastructure on 4th Avenue West. Council directed staff to waive building permit fees for an affordable housing project and approved a phased reduction.

Page 5 of 114

Minutes
Owen Sound City Council
April 13, 2026
5:30 p.m.
City Hall - 808 2nd Avenue East - Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ian Boddy
Deputy Mayor Scott Greig
Councillor Travis Dodd
Councillor Jon Farmer
Councillor Brock Hamley
Councillor Marion Koepke
Councillor Suneet Kukreja
Councillor Carol Merton
MEMBERS
ABSENT/REGRETS:

Councillor Melanie Middlebro'

STAFF PRESENT:

Tim Simmonds, City Manager
Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services
Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services
Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering
Phil Eagleson, Fire Chief
Janet Ashfield, Manager of Human Resources
Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk
Staci Landry, Deputy Clerk
_____________________________________________________________________

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Boddy called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
All Council members and staff listed above were present except for the Manager of
Human Resources.

CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
2.a

Mayor Boddy Re: Mayor's Update

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
3.a

Councillor Hamley:


Discussion Arising out of Item 9.a – Correspondence from Donald
Statham, Lutheran Social Services Re: Request to Waive Building Permit
Fees for St. Clare Place.



Report CR-26-035 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026
Provincial Gas Tax Letter of Agreement.



Report CR-26-036 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Court
Security and Prisoner Transportation Program.



Correspondence items 1.c and 2.b contained within Item 11.l –
Correspondence Received which is Presented for the Information of
Council.
1

Page 6 of 114



By-law No. 2026-036 being “A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to
execute an Encroachment Agreement with the Ministry of Transportation
respecting 9th Avenue East reconstruction project”.

Councillor Hamley declared a conflict of interest with discussion arising out of
Item 9.a, Items 11.b, 11.c, discussion arising out of items 1.c and 2.b contained
within Item 11.l, and 21.i of the agenda, due to his personal employment with the
Government of Ontario.
4.

CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES
4.a

Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on March 9,
2026

4.b

Minutes of the Closed Session of the Community Services Committee meeting
held on March 18, 2026

4.c

Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on March 23, 2026
"THAT the minutes of the following meetings be adopted as printed:
1. Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on March 9,
2026;
2. Closed Session of the Community Services Committee meeting held
on March 18, 2026; and
3. Regular Council meeting held on March 23, 2026."

MOTION TO MOVE COUNCIL INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
"THAT City Council now move into Committee of the Whole to consider public
meetings, deputations and presentations, public forum, matters arising from
correspondence, reports of City staff, consent agenda, committee minutes,
matters postponed, motions for which notice was previously given and additional
business."
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

PUBLIC MEETINGS
There were no public meetings.

DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
7.a

Deputation from Shauna Doyle, Owen Sound & North Grey Union Public Library
Information Specialist Re: Introduction of Poet Laureate, Jennifer Frankum
Ms. Doyle introduced the 2026-2027 poet laureate, Jennifer Frankum. Ms. Doyle
advised that the Poet Laureate program is hosted by the Owen Sound & North
Grey Union Public Library with funding from several members of the community
as opposed to tax-based funding.
Ms. Doyle advised that Jennifer Frankum fashions poems out of everyday
moments of wonder.
2

Page 7 of 114

Ms. Frankum read two of her poems, "A Rather Serious Poem" and "Ink rivered
my journal".
8.

PUBLIC FORUM
8.a

Doug Murdoch, Owen Sound resident
Mr. Murdoch raised concerns regarding building permit enforcement,
encampments along the rail trail near 26th Street East, and the loss of City trees
near the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Mayor Boddy advised Mr. Murdoch and other residents to utilize the City's
"Report a Concern" feature on its website, noting that it enables issues to be
formally tracked and followed up.

8.b

Kelly Carmichael, Owen Sound resident
Ms. Carmichael, on behalf of a group of residents in the Brooke area, expressed
support for the inclusion of a bicycle lane on 4th Avenue West as part of the
reconstruction project, noting that it would enhance safety for families and other
users.

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS
REQUIRED
9.a

Correspondence from Donald Statham, Lutheran Social Services Re: Request to
Waive Building Permit Fees for St. Clare Place
The Director of Community Services advised that the estimated building permit
fees for the development are $127,575.84 and 50 per cent of units will be
affordable.
"THAT in consideration of the correspondence listed on the April 13, 2026
Council agenda from Donald Statham of Lutheran Social Services
respecting a Request to Waive Building Permit Fees for St. Clare Place, City
Council directs staff to waive the building permit fees for St. Clare Place."
The Manager of Human Resources joined the meeting.
Councillor Hamley declared a conflict of interest at this time with discussion
arising out of Item 9.a due to his personal employment with the Government of
Ontario and left the Council Chambers.
"THAT in consideration of the correspondence listed on the April 13, 2026
Council agenda from Donald Statham of Lutheran Social Services
respecting a Request to Waive Building Permit Fees for St. Clare Place, City
Council directs the Mayor to send a letter to the Honourable Doug Ford,
Premier of Ontario, indicating that the City of Owen Sound has met the
Province's mandate for affordable housing."
Councillor Hamley returned to his chair.

10.

REPORTS OF CITY STAFF
10.a

Report CR-26-028 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 MultiResidential Tax Rate Reduction - Final Phase
The Director of Corporate Services provided an overview of the report.
3

Page 8 of 114

"THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-028 respecting the 2026
Multi- Residential Tax Rate Reduction, City Council directs staff to:
1. Reduce the multi-residential tax ratio to 1.0, representing the final
increment in the City’s four-year phased approach; and
2. Bring forward a by-law to authorize the collection of 2026 property
taxes based on the approved tax ratios and rates."
10.b

Report CR-26-031 from the City Clerk Re: 2027 Committee Structure and
Calendar
The City Clerk provided an overview of the report through a PowerPoint
presentation.
"THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-031 respecting the 2027
Committee Structure and Calendar, City Council:
1. Approves the Terms of Reference for the Resilient Community
Advisory Committee;
2. Approves the Terms of Reference for the Sustainable Community
Advisory Committee;
3. Approves the Terms of Reference for the Vibrant Community
Advisory Committee;
4. Approves the Terms of Reference for the Tom Thomson Art Gallery
Advisory Committee;
5. Directs staff to bring forward a by-law to amend the Board,
Committee and Seat Selection Policy No. GOV001 to amend
committee start dates and Council seating start dates;
6. Directs staff to bring forward the 2027 Board and Committee By-law
for approval, including new terms of reference, working group
clauses, and any changes to the Grey Sauble Conservation Authority
Board;
7. Directs staff to bring forward a by-law to amend the Procedural Bylaw to publish committee agendas earlier, remove standing
committee references, and make housekeeping changes to the
absence of the chair section as outlined in the report;
8. Directs staff to provide notice of the proposed amendment to the
Procedural By-law in accordance with the Notice By-law; and
9. Approves the 2027 Council and Committee meeting calendar,
substantially in the form attached to the report."

Page 9 of 114

Prior to a vote on the motion, Councillor Farmer requested a recorded vote:
In Favour
X

Councillor Dodd
Councillor Farmer
Councillor Hamley
Councillor Koepke
Councillor Kukreja
Councillor Merton
Deputy Mayor Greig
Mayor Boddy

Opposed
X

X
X
X
X
X
X

10.c

Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council
Deputy Mayor Greig reported that Grey County Council:


Awarded tenders for two road projects, including the Dundalk Main Street
reconstruction and Grey Road 12.



Received the 2025 Provincial Offences Court report which noted the most
common cases arose under the Highway Traffic Act, municipal by-laws,
the Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act, Dog Owners' Liability Act,
Building Code Act, Trespass to Property Act, and Liquor Licence and
Control Act. The Owen Sound Police Service issued 1,100 of the 11,796
total tickets filed across Bruce and Grey Counties. For municipal by-law
offences, 25 per cent of each fine is retained by the Provincial Offences
Court while 75 per cent is remitted to the municipality under which the bylaw offence originated.



Approved the voluntary Green Development Program with an anticipated
launch in spring 2026.



Postponed the primary motion from the Urban Road and Road Exchange
Task Force and referred the matter back to the Task Force for further
review with additional staff reporting and lower-tier municipal participation.



Supported the reduction of the multi-residential tax class ratio to 1.



Received a Strategic Plan status update which indicated that 33 per cent
of objectives and goals have been completed, with 65 per cent currently in
progress.

Deputy Mayor Greig advised that the Cruise and Connect: A Grey & Bruce
Networking Event will be held aboard the M.S. Chi-Cheemaun on April 23, 2026
at 6:30 p.m., with tickets available for purchase via Eventbrite.
"THAT in consideration of the Verbal Report provided April 13, 2026 from
Deputy Mayor Greig respecting Grey County Council, City Council receives
the Verbal Report for information purposes."
11.

CONSENT AGENDA
11.a

Report CR-26-034 from the City Clerk Re: 2026 Election Report No. 3

11.b

Report CR-26-035 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Provincial
Gas Tax Letter of Agreement
5

Page 10 of 114

11.c

Report CR-26-036 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Court
Security and Prisoner Transportation Program

11.d

Report OP-26-020 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re:
Extension of Grey County Street Sweeping Agreement

11.e

Report OP-26-017 from the Manager of Public Works and Engineering Re:
Delegation of Authority for Servicing Agreements

11.f

Report OP-26-018 from the Engineering Technologist III Re: 9th Avenue East
Reconstruction - 6th Street East to Superior Street Phase 2 Encroachment and
Delegation of Authority for Encroachment Approvals

11.g

Report CR-26-032 from the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re: Award of
City of Owen Sound Component of Grey County Joint Tender RFT-TS-20-26
Milling and Hot Mix Asphalt Paving

11.h

Report CR-26-029 from the Deputy Clerk Re: Appointment of a Director to the
River District Board of Management

11.i

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Bruce Grey Poverty Task
Force meeting held on March 20, 2026

11.j

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound & North Grey
Union Public Library Board meeting held on February 5, 2026

11.k

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound Police Service
Board meeting held on February 18, 2026

11.l

Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council
"THAT in consideration of the items listed on the April 13, 2026 Consent
Agenda, City Council:
1. Receives Items 11.a, 11.d, 11.e, 11.f, 11.h, 11.i, 11.j, and 11.l (save and
except items 1.c and 2.b); and
2. Approves the recommendations contained in Items 11.a, 11.d, 11.e,
11.f, and 11.h."
Having declared a conflict of interest with Items 11.b and 11.c, Councillor Hamley
left the Council Chambers.
"THAT in consideration of the items listed on the April 13, 2026 Consent
Agenda, City Council approves the recommendations contained in Items
11.b and 11.c."
Councillor Hamley returned to his chair.
"THAT in consideration of the items listed on the April 13, 2026 Consent
Agenda, City Council approves the recommendation contained in Item
11.g."
6

Page 11 of 114

"THAT in consideration of the items listed on the April 13, 2026 Consent
Agenda, City Council receives Item 11.k."
Councillor Hamley declared a conflict of interest at this time with discussions
arising out of items 1.c and 2.b on the correspondence package (Item 11.l) due to
his personal employment with the Government of Ontario and left the Council
Chambers.
"THAT in consideration of items 1.c and 2.b on the correspondence
package (Item 11.l) listed on the April 13, 2026 Consent Agenda respecting
Regional Governance Changes, City Council directs staff to send a letter to
Paul Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound expressing concerns with
the proposed changes to the Regional Governance Act."
Councillor Hamley returned to his chair.
12.

COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL
12.a

Minutes of the Community Services Committee meeting held on March 18, 2026
"THAT the minutes of the Community Services Committee meeting held on
March 18, 2026 be received and the recommendations contained therein be
approved."

12.b

Minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on March 19, 2026
"THAT the minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on March 19,
2026 be received and the recommendations contained therein be
approved."
Deputy Mayor Greig presented a motion respecting a preferred option for the 4th
Avenue West reconstruction from 15th Street to 20th Street.
In response to a question from Council, the Director of Public Works and
Engineering advised that the project would not be able to commence until 2027 if
an option is not selected at tonight’s meeting. The City Manager suggested that
the matter be referred to the April 23, 2026 Operations Committee meeting and
subsequently brought forward to Council on April 27, 2026.
Mayor Boddy requested a recess for staff to consider timing of a decision.
Council recessed from 7:14 p.m. to 7:23 p.m.
The City Manager advised that referring the 4th Avenue West preferred option to
the April 23, 2026 Operations Committee meeting can be accommodated by staff
and meet the applicable timelines. Deputy Mayor Greig withdrew his motion in
favour of a subsequent motion.
7

Page 12 of 114

"THAT in consideration of a presentation at the Operations Committee
meeting held on March 19, 2026 from WSP Canada Inc. respecting the 4th
Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street), City Council
refers the selection of a preferred option for the 4th Avenue West
reconstruction project to the April 23, 2026 Operations Committee
meeting."
13.

MATTERS POSTPONED
There were no postponed matters.

14.

MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN
14.a

Motion for Which Notice was Previously Given by Deputy Mayor Greig at the
March 23, 2026 Regular Council Meeting Re: Rescue on Georgian Bay
In response to a question from Council, the Fire Chief advised that $4,700 in
operating costs was incurred by Owen Sound Fire and Emergency Services
related to fuel and staff time for the rescue operation that day.
"WHEREAS on March 8, 2026, Owen Sound Fire and Emergency Services
responded to a rescue on Georgian Bay;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT City Council directs staff to
prepare a report on the costs borne by the City and prepare to issue
proportionate invoicing."
Prior to a vote on the motion, Councillor Merton requested a recorded vote:
In Favour
Councillor Dodd
Councillor Farmer
Councillor Hamley
Councillor Koepke
Councillor Kukreja
Councillor Merton
Deputy Mayor Greig
Mayor Boddy

Opposed
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

opposed.
15.

DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
15.a

Mayor's Update
Mayor Boddy advised that he received correspondence from Statistics Canada
indicating that the next Census of Population will commence on May 4, 2026,
and encouraged residents to complete the questionnaire upon receipt of their
census invitation and secure access code.
Mayor Boddy advised that he attended the Leadership Breakfast hosted by
Bruce Power on March 27, 2026, and a session for municipal leaders at the
Barrie Campus of Georgian College on April 10, 2026 to discuss the Regional
Labour Needs Study.
8

Page 13 of 114

Mayor Boddy noted two upcoming events:


Earth Day Celebration on April 22, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. outside of City Hall.



Arts, Culture and Volunteer Awards Ceremony on April 16, 2026 from
6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Bayshore Community Centre.

Mayor Boddy advised that turf installation is underway at the Bayshore
Community Centre and encouraged the public to attend upcoming lacrosse
games.
16.

MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT
"THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report."
FORMAL SESSION

17.

MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
"THAT the action taken in Committee of the Whole in considering public
meetings, deputations and presentations, public forum, matters arising from
correspondence, reports of City staff, consent agenda, committee minutes,
matters postponed, motions for which notice was previously given and additional
business be confirmed by this Council."

18.

NOTICES OF MOTION
There were no notices of motion.

19.

MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION
Prior to moving into Closed Session, Mayor Boddy advised that for those who are
watching the meeting live on Rogers Cable TV or the Rogers TV website, the Rogers
feed will not reconnect to the meeting upon Council returning to the open session to
report out of the Closed Session and review the by-laws. If anyone would like to view
the remainder of the open session, they can watch the livestream on the City's Council
and Committees webpage at www.owensound.ca/meetings. The video recording of the
meeting will also be posted on this webpage following the meeting.
"THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:
1. Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on
March 23, 2026;
2. One matter regarding labour relations or employee negotiations respecting
Fire Services;
3. One matter regarding advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege,
including communications necessary for that purpose, and a position,
plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied to negotiations
respecting consultation requirements; and
9

Page 14 of 114

4. One matter regarding a proposed or pending acquisition of land by the
municipality, and a position, plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be
applied to negotiations respecting property on 2nd Avenue West."
Council moved into the Closed Session at 7:50 p.m.
20.

REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Boddy advised that Council returned to the open session at 9:00 p.m.
All Council members and staff listed above were present except for the Manager of
Human Resources.
During the Closed Session, City Council:

21.



Reviewed minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on
March 23, 2026;



Discussed one matter regarding labour relations or employee negotiations
respecting Fire Services, and direction was provided to staff;



Discussed one matter regarding advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege,
including communications necessary for that purpose, and a position, plan,
procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied to negotiations respecting
consultation requirements, and no direction was provided; and



Discussed one matter regarding a proposed or pending acquisition of land by the
municipality, and a position, plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied
to negotiations respecting property on 2nd Avenue West, and no direction was
provided.

BY-LAWS
21.a

By-law No. 2026-028
"A By-law to confirm the proceedings of the Regular Meeting of the Council of
The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound held on the 13th day of April, 2026"

21.b

By-law No. 2026-029
"A By-law to adopt Official Plan 2026 for the City of Owen Sound and repeal
Official Plan 2021"

21.c

By-law No. 2026-030
"A By-law to amend Zoning By-law No. 2010-078, for conformity with Official Plan
2026 and housekeeping purposes (ZBA No. 57)"

21.d

By-law No. 2026-031
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement with IPAC
Paving Limited, respecting milling and hot mix asphalt paving in accordance with
RFT-TS-20-26"

21.e

By-law No. 2026-032
"A By-law to adopt an External Communication Strategy for the City of Owen
Sound"

21.f

By-law No. 2026-033
"A By-law to amend Board and Committee By-law No. 2026-008 to appoint
Maegan Cookson to the River District Board of Management"

21.g

By-law No. 2026-034
"A By-law to adopt Council’s Budget Policy GOV004 and repeal Policy CrSHR40"
10

Page 15 of 114

21.h

By-law No. 2026-035
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Licence Agreement and
all other documents necessary to complete Minutes of Settlement with Sonik
Inc."

21.i

By-law No. 2026-036
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an Encroachment
Agreement with the Ministry of Transportation respecting the 9th Avenue East
reconstruction project"

21.j

By-law No. 2026-037
"A By-law to amend Delegation of Powers and Duties By-law No. 2014-109
respecting encroachment agreements for construction purposes and servicing
agreements"
"THAT By-law Numbers 2026-028, 2026-029, 2026-030, 2026-031, 2026-032,
2026-033, 2026-034, 2026-035, and 2026-037 be passed and enacted."
"THAT By-law Number 2026-036 be passed and enacted."

22.

ADJOURNMENT
The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Mayor Boddy
adjourned the meeting at 9:02 p.m.

_________________________
Mayor Ian C. Boddy

_________________________
Briana M. Bloomfield, City Clerk

Page 16 of 114

Staff Report
Report To:

City Council

Report From:

Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning and Heritage

Meeting Date:

April 27, 2026

Report Code:

CS-26-030

Subject:

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026

Recommendations:
THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-030 respecting Bill 98, Building
Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026, City Council
directs staff to:
1.

Send this report to the Province of Ontario as the City’s comments
on Bill 98 and the Environmental Registry of Ontario posting:
a.

026-0300;

026-0305;

026-0309;

026-0310;

026-0311;

026-0312;

026-0313;

026-0314; and

026-0315; and

Forward this report to Paul Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen
Sound.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 1 of 11

4.b Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on April 13, 2026 MOTION TO MOVE COUNCIL INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

Council concluded the agenda by moving into a closed session to address sensitive matters including fire service negotiations, solicitor-client privileged advice, and land acquisition discussions on 2nd Avenue West, before reporting out with no new direction given on the latter two items.

Page 5 of 114

Councillor Melanie Middlebro'

STAFF PRESENT:

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Boddy called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
All Council members and staff listed above were present except for the Manager of
Human Resources.

CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
2.a

Mayor Boddy Re: Mayor's Update

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
3.a

Councillor Hamley:


Discussion Arising out of Item 9.a – Correspondence from Donald
Statham, Lutheran Social Services Re: Request to Waive Building Permit
Fees for St. Clare Place.



Report CR-26-035 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026
Provincial Gas Tax Letter of Agreement.



Report CR-26-036 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Court
Security and Prisoner Transportation Program.



Correspondence items 1.c and 2.b contained within Item 11.l –
Correspondence Received which is Presented for the Information of
Council.
1

Page 6 of 114



By-law No. 2026-036 being “A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to
execute an Encroachment Agreement with the Ministry of Transportation
respecting 9th Avenue East reconstruction project”.

CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES
4.a

Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on March 9,
2026

4.b

Minutes of the Closed Session of the Community Services Committee meeting
held on March 18, 2026

4.c

PUBLIC MEETINGS
There were no public meetings.

DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
7.a

Page 7 of 114

Ms. Frankum read two of her poems, "A Rather Serious Poem" and "Ink rivered
my journal".
8.

PUBLIC FORUM
8.a

8.b

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS
REQUIRED
9.a

10.

REPORTS OF CITY STAFF
10.a

Report CR-26-028 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 MultiResidential Tax Rate Reduction - Final Phase
The Director of Corporate Services provided an overview of the report.
3

Page 8 of 114

Page 9 of 114

Prior to a vote on the motion, Councillor Farmer requested a recorded vote:
In Favour
X

Councillor Dodd
Councillor Farmer
Councillor Hamley
Councillor Koepke
Councillor Kukreja
Councillor Merton
Deputy Mayor Greig
Mayor Boddy

Opposed
X

X
X
X
X
X
X

10.c

Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council
Deputy Mayor Greig reported that Grey County Council:


Awarded tenders for two road projects, including the Dundalk Main Street
reconstruction and Grey Road 12.



Approved the voluntary Green Development Program with an anticipated
launch in spring 2026.



Supported the reduction of the multi-residential tax class ratio to 1.



Received a Strategic Plan status update which indicated that 33 per cent
of objectives and goals have been completed, with 65 per cent currently in
progress.

CONSENT AGENDA
11.a

Report CR-26-034 from the City Clerk Re: 2026 Election Report No. 3

11.b

Report CR-26-035 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Provincial
Gas Tax Letter of Agreement
5

Page 10 of 114

11.c

Report CR-26-036 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Court
Security and Prisoner Transportation Program

11.d

Report OP-26-020 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re:
Extension of Grey County Street Sweeping Agreement

11.e

Report OP-26-017 from the Manager of Public Works and Engineering Re:
Delegation of Authority for Servicing Agreements

11.f

11.g

Report CR-26-032 from the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re: Award of
City of Owen Sound Component of Grey County Joint Tender RFT-TS-20-26
Milling and Hot Mix Asphalt Paving

11.h

Report CR-26-029 from the Deputy Clerk Re: Appointment of a Director to the
River District Board of Management

11.i

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Bruce Grey Poverty Task
Force meeting held on March 20, 2026

11.j

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound & North Grey
Union Public Library Board meeting held on February 5, 2026

11.k

Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound Police Service
Board meeting held on February 18, 2026

11.l

Page 11 of 114

COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL
12.a

12.b

Page 12 of 114

MATTERS POSTPONED
There were no postponed matters.

14.

MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN
14.a

Opposed
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

opposed.
15.

DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
15.a

Page 13 of 114

Mayor Boddy noted two upcoming events:


Earth Day Celebration on April 22, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. outside of City Hall.



Arts, Culture and Volunteer Awards Ceremony on April 16, 2026 from
6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Bayshore Community Centre.

Mayor Boddy advised that turf installation is underway at the Bayshore
Community Centre and encouraged the public to attend upcoming lacrosse
games.
16.

MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT
"THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report."
FORMAL SESSION

17.

18.

NOTICES OF MOTION
There were no notices of motion.

19.

Page 14 of 114

21.



Reviewed minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on
March 23, 2026;



Discussed one matter regarding labour relations or employee negotiations
respecting Fire Services, and direction was provided to staff;



BY-LAWS
21.a

By-law No. 2026-028
"A By-law to confirm the proceedings of the Regular Meeting of the Council of
The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound held on the 13th day of April, 2026"

21.b

By-law No. 2026-029
"A By-law to adopt Official Plan 2026 for the City of Owen Sound and repeal
Official Plan 2021"

21.c

By-law No. 2026-030
"A By-law to amend Zoning By-law No. 2010-078, for conformity with Official Plan
2026 and housekeeping purposes (ZBA No. 57)"

21.d

By-law No. 2026-031
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement with IPAC
Paving Limited, respecting milling and hot mix asphalt paving in accordance with
RFT-TS-20-26"

21.e

By-law No. 2026-032
"A By-law to adopt an External Communication Strategy for the City of Owen
Sound"

21.f

By-law No. 2026-033
"A By-law to amend Board and Committee By-law No. 2026-008 to appoint
Maegan Cookson to the River District Board of Management"

21.g

By-law No. 2026-034
"A By-law to adopt Council’s Budget Policy GOV004 and repeal Policy CrSHR40"
10

Page 15 of 114

21.h

By-law No. 2026-035
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Licence Agreement and
all other documents necessary to complete Minutes of Settlement with Sonik
Inc."

21.i

By-law No. 2026-036
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an Encroachment
Agreement with the Ministry of Transportation respecting the 9th Avenue East
reconstruction project"

21.j

22.

ADJOURNMENT
The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Mayor Boddy
adjourned the meeting at 9:02 p.m.

_________________________
Mayor Ian C. Boddy

_________________________
Briana M. Bloomfield, City Clerk

Page 16 of 114

Staff Report
Report To:

City Council

Report From:

Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning and Heritage

Meeting Date:

April 27, 2026

Report Code:

CS-26-030

Subject:

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026

Recommendations:
THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-030 respecting Bill 98, Building
Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026, City Council
directs staff to:
1.

Send this report to the Province of Ontario as the City’s comments
on Bill 98 and the Environmental Registry of Ontario posting:
a.

026-0300;

026-0305;

026-0309;

026-0310;

026-0311;

026-0312;

026-0313;

026-0314; and

026-0315; and

Forward this report to Paul Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen
Sound.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 1 of 11

6 PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings.

The agenda item for public meetings is explicitly cancelled, with no sessions scheduled.

6 PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings.

PUBLIC MEETINGS
There are no public meetings.

7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

The agenda item covers deputations and presentations, specifically featuring an update from the Acting City Manager regarding Corporate Services.

7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
7.a
Presentation from the Acting City Manager (Director of Corporate
Services) Re: City Manager's Update

8 PUBLIC FORUM

The public forum segment offers a platform for community voices without specific content details.

8 PUBLIC FORUM

PUBLIC FORUM

9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED There are no correspondence items being presented for consideration.

No correspondence items are being presented for consideration.

9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED There are no correspondence items being presented for consideration.

CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS
REQUIRED
There are no correspondence items being presented for consideration.

10 REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 10.a

This section contains no substantive text or newsworthy details beyond the agenda header.

10 REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 10.a

REPORTS OF CITY STAFF
10.a

11 Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council CONSENT AGENDA

The Deputy Mayor presented a consent agenda covering planning reports on the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act and a patio permit by-law. Final approvals were issued for business licences for GlowUp Beauty, Good Neighbour Resale, and Rowan's Roost, alongside city hall illumination requests.

11 Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council CONSENT AGENDA

Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council
CONSENT AGENDA
11.a
Report CS-26-030 from the Manager of Planning and Heritage Re: Bill
98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act,
11.b
Report CS-26-031 from the Senior Planner Re: Patio Permit By-law
11.c
Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences:
11.d
•
GlowUp Beauty, a nail and eye lash studio located at 968 2nd
Avenue West
•
Good Neighbour Resale, a grocery store for dry goods located
at 956 2nd Avenue East
•
Rowan's Roost, a take-out restaurant located at 791 1st
Avenue East
Final approvals issued for the following City Hall Illumination Requests:
•
11.e

11.a Report CS-26-030 from the Manager of Planning and Heritage Re: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act,

Bill 98 proposes standardizing official plans and prohibiting mandatory municipal green building standards outside of health or safety requirements, which staff argue undermines local flexibility and imposes costly updates on smaller municipalities. The legislation also seeks to set provincial minimum lot sizes and facilitate electronic submissions, though staff warn that technology changes not aligned with existing tools like Cloudpermit will be disruptive. Additionally, the report addresses public sector ownership in water corporations and communal system consents, while calling for supportive policy guidance rather than prohibitions on green development solutions.

Page 17 of 114

Highlights:




On March 30, 2026, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
introduced Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026 (“Bill 98”) as well as a series of proposed
regulatory changes for consultation on the Environmental Registry of
Ontario (ERO). The deadline for comments is May 14, 2026.
Schedule 7 of Bill 98 outlines changes to the Planning Act which will
come into force on the day the Building Homes and Improving
Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026 receives Royal Assent. The
following amendments are intended to come into force immediately
upon approval:
o
o

o
o
o
o
o




Streamlining and Standardizing Official Plans.
Prohibit Mandatory Municipal Enhanced Development
Standards and Green Building Standards and Removal of
Electric Vehicle Parking Requirements.
Prescribed Minimum Lot Standards and Minimum Lot Sizes –
175 square metres.
Encumbered Parkland and Privately Owned Public Spaces
(POPS).
Development Charges Exemptions.
Removal of Notice Requirements for Minister’s Zoning Orders.
County of Simcoe as a Prescribed Municipality.

Many of the proposed changes in Bill 98 reflect a broad push toward
provincial standardization to achieve time savings in the development
process. While consistency can be beneficial, these changes will impact
municipal flexibility and, if passed, it will require changes to
established practices, processes and approved plans.
The chart attached in Schedule ‘A’ provides comments on the
associated ERO postings.

Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment:
Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service
delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more
strategic priorities.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 2 of 11

Page 18 of 114

Previous Report/Authority:
CS-22-013 - Bill 276, the Supporting Recovery and Competitiveness Act,
2021 & Bill 13, The Supporting People and Businesses Act, 2021
CS-22-084 - Bill 109 More Homes for Everyone Act
CS-22-149 and CS-23-078 - Bill 23 – More Homes Built Faster Act
CS-23-053 - Bill 97, Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023
CS-23-012 and CS-23-080 - Proposed Provincial Policy Statement 2023
CS-23-122- Bill 139 Proposed Less Red Tape, More Common Sense Act,
2023
CS-24-038 - Bill 185, Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2023
CS-24-075 - Provincial Planning Statement, 2024
CM-25-016 - Bill 17, Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act,
2025
CS-25-118 - Bill 60, Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, 2025 Update

Background:
On March 30, 2026, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
introduced Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026 (“Bill 98”) as well as a series of proposed regulatory
changes for consultation on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO).
These ERO consultations build on proposals that were initially introduced for
consultation in 2025. The release of Bill 98 was accompanied by a technical
briefing outlining the Province’s rationale for many of the proposed changes.
Bill 98 has passed second reading. The deadline for comments is May 14,
2026.
Schedule 7 of Bill 98 outlines changes to the Planning Act which will come
into force on the day the Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026 receives Royal Assent. The following amendments
are intended to come into force immediately upon approval:


Streamlining and Standardizing Official Plans.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 3 of 11

Page 19 of 114



Prohibit Mandatory Municipal Enhanced Development Standards and
Green Building Standards and Removal of Electric Vehicle Parking
Requirements.



Prescribed Minimum Lot Standards and Minimum Lot Sizes – 175
square metres.



Encumbered Parkland and Privately Owned Public Spaces (POPS).



Development Charges Exemptions.



Removal of Notice Requirements for Minister’s Zoning Orders.



County of Simcoe as a Prescribed Municipality.

Analysis and Options:
Many of the proposed changes in Bill 98 reflect a broad push toward
provincial standardization to achieve time savings in the development
process. While consistency can be beneficial, these changes will impact
municipal flexibility and, if passed, it will require changes to established
practices, processes, and plans.
The following sections provide comments on the amendments proposed to
come into force subject to Bill 98 receiving Royal Ascent.
The chart attached in Schedule ‘A’ provides comments on the associated ERO
postings.

Official Plans
The amendment provides for a standardized Official Plan structure which
includes a standardized set of land use designations to be used in local
official plans, with the ability for the Minister to set out further direction on
implementing any of these designations, including using two or more subdesignations. This includes 10 standard chapters with standardized sub
sections and a standardized set of Schedules and Appendices to be included
at chapter 11. Bill 98 also proposes a standardized set of twelve (12) land
use designations, which are the only land use designations which may be
used in the official plans of lower- and single-tier municipalities.
This templated approach to Official Plans was introduced in October 2025
with proposals from the Province, and several adjustments to the proposal
have been made in consideration of the feedback received to date. The
Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 4 of 11

Page 20 of 114

proposed legislation identifies the timeline for implementation, which for
Owen Sound would be January 1, 2029. Bill 98 provides that the former
official plan framework continues to apply to a municipality until the day on
which a new official plan or a revision of the official plan is adopted through a
section 26 exercise after the applicable transition date. A section 26 exercise
is an update to an official plan to bring it into conformity with provincial plans
and into consistency with policy statements, such as the Provincial Planning
Statement (PPS), 2024. The recently completed City Official Plan update was
in part a section 26 update. Municipalities are required to do so no less
frequently than 10 years after an official plan first comes into effect as a new
official plan; and every five years thereafter. Should the legislation proceed,
a more detailed analysis of the required work and associated impacts would
be brought forward to Committee and Council. It is anticipated that an
amendment would be required to the City’s Official Plan to bring it into
conformity with the provincial legislation.

Removal of Electric Vehicle Parking Requirements
Bill 98 contains amendments to s. 34 (zoning) and s. 41 (site plan) to
prohibit municipalities from imposing requirements for infrastructure that
supports electric vehicles. The 2026 Update to the City’s Zoning By-law
(approved by Council on April 13 and currently in the appeal period) contains
requirements for electric vehicle parking. If this legislation comes into effect,
the provisions in the By-law would no longer be in force. Staff will explore
and report back to Council through Community Services Committee
regarding a possible housekeeping update to the Zoning By-law to address
this situation. Once the legislation is in effect, the rules in the Planning Act
would supersede any requirement in the City’s Zoning By-law such that the
requirement for electric vehicle charging infrastructure would not be
required.

Enhanced Development Standards
The Province has indicated that enhanced (green) development standards
differ across jurisdictions causing complexity and increased costs. The
proposed changes would create a shift from a mandatory to a voluntary
approach for these enhanced development standards that are not required
for purposes of health and safety or environmental functionality (i.e.,
stormwater management). The City planning policies currently do not contain
enhanced development standards.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 5 of 11

Page 21 of 114

Grey County has recently developed a Green Development Program. The
program is a voluntary recognition and capacity building program that aims
to celebrate leadership in efficient, resilient, and sustainable residential
development projects across Grey, Dufferin, and Wellington Counties. As a
collaborative initiative between the three Counties, the program will create a
consistent, supportive framework for new residential construction, with a
focus on projects of 10 or more units.
The program consists of three main parts:




The Metrics – Recognizing the diversity of development projects, the
framework consists of a flexible menu of 18 possible development
features or ‘Metrics’ that applicants may choose to incorporate into
their project.
Recognition – For each Metric incorporated, the project achieves a
certain number of points. Based on their total number of points, the
project would be recognized at a bronze, silver, or gold level.
Capacity Building –Knowledge, best practices, case studies,
resources, and training opportunities will be shared with the
construction and development industry to overcome local barriers to
advancing more efficient, resilient construction.

Grey County staff will provide a presentation on the Green Development
Program to the Community Services Committee in the coming months.

Minimum Area of Parcel – Prescribed Minimum Lot Standards
Bill 98 proposes to amend the Planning Act to limit the ability of
municipalities to pass a by-law under section 34 that imposes a minimum lot
area for residential land that is greater than an area to be prescribed through
regulation. An additional subsection is proposed that would deem by-law
provisions regulating minimum lot frontage and depth to be of no effect to
the extent that they would require a parcel to be larger than the prescribed
minimum lot area. The prescribed minimum lot size is proposed to be 175
square metres (1,880 square feet).
Notably, this proposal does not remove the requirement for proposals to be
consistent with the PPS and conform or not conflict with provincial plans.
Staff note that the County of Grey has also put forward a Staff
Recommendation Report. City Planning staff concur with County staff
regarding the proposed minimum lot area:
Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 6 of 11

Page 22 of 114

“Staff would note that the combination of not having higher-order
transit (or any transit in some communities) and high amounts of
snowfall necessitating a degree of onsite winter snow storage would
make a minimum residential lot size of 175 m2 very difficult to support.
The front yard area and need for snow storage becomes further
compounded when space for sidewalks are also factored in. Staff also
note that lots of this size may not be suitable to accommodate
Additional Residential Units (ARUs) as are broadly permitted per the
Planning Act on urban residential lands. Staff would generally support
the province’s intent here, and suggest the province may wish to
consider the following:
a) Clarify if the 175 m2 is meant to apply to any housing type, or if
that minimum lot size could only be used for town or rowhouses,
and
b) Consider a range of minimum lot sizes depending on the
characteristics of the urban residential land i.e., is there transit,
what are the annual snowfall levels, etc.
This new minimum lot area may negatively impact the development of
uses such as stacked townhouses. This lot area minimum also does
not consider impacts on sanitary and water servicing or storm water
management.
Should such minimum lot sizes be implemented, municipalities may
also need to adjust other lot standards such as setbacks or maximum
lot coverage percentages.
Staff would further flag there are implementation costs to
municipalities for such changes. The Environmental Registry posting
flags the following as it applies to costs. “The direct compliance cost for
all 444 municipalities is estimated at approximately $472,856 and an
average annual direct compliance cost of approximately $46,600.
These one-time administrative impacts reflect staff familiarization and
minor updates to internal planning guidance and workflows to apply
the provincial minimum lot size.”
As such, staff would request that the province provide funding to
municipalities to cover these implementation costs.” (PDR-CW-1826County Comments on Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving
Transportation Infrastructure Act)
Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 7 of 11

Page 23 of 114

Parkland Dedication (ERO 026-0312)
The Bill 23 changes contemplated an “owner initiated” conveyance of land, or
an easement in land, to a municipality, to satisfy some or all the
municipality’s parkland dedication requirements. Bill 98’s proposed changes,
in addition to bringing these changes into force and effect, would now clarify
that that any easement received pursuant to such a conveyance is valid,
regardless of whether the municipality owns adjacent lands that are capable
of being accommodated or benefitted by the easement. Additionally,
proposed changes will authorize municipalities to require agreements for
encumbered lands and implement a credit system. Planning staff would echo
the recommendations of the County of Grey as is relates to the Province
providing template agreements to municipalities to offset the costs and
workload associated with encumbered lands agreements.

Development Charge Exemption
Bill 98 would add a new section to the Development Charges Act, 1997
defining a “non-profit retirement home development” that will be exempt
from development charges. The exemption will not apply to charges due
before the day Bill 98 comes into force, however, future installments of
development charge payments will be exempt if they are due after this day.

Removal of Notice Requirements for Minister’s Zoning Orders
Bill 98 proposes to amend section 47 of the Planning Act by striking out the
requirement that the Minister must give notice when the Minister initiates an
amendment or revocation of an existing Minister Zoning Order.

County of Simcoe as a Prescribed Municipality
Lastly, Bill 98 seeks to amend the definition of an “upper-tier municipality
without planning responsibilities” in the Planning Act so that the County of
Simcoe has three separate definitions, representing the three-phase removal
of the County of Simcoe’s planning responsibilities based on the lower-tier
municipalities’ readiness.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 8 of 11

Page 24 of 114

Resource Alignment:
Financial Resources
There are potential financial implications associated with bringing City policy
into conformity with the proposed legislative amendments, should they come
into force and effect.
As noted, an Official Plan amendment/update may be required depending on
the transition timeline and requirements. Staff request that the Province
provide municipalities with financial support to implement the changes as it
is anticipated that the changes will require significant resources to
operationalize.
As noted above, there are implementation costs to municipalities for such
changes. The Environmental Registry posting flags the following as it applies
to costs: “The direct compliance cost for all 444 municipalities is estimated at
approximately $472,856 and an average annual direct compliance cost of
approximately $46,600. These one-time administrative impacts reflect staff
familiarization and minor updates to internal planning guidance and
workflows to apply the provincial minimum lot size.”

Human Resources
As noted above, the proposed changes will require significant staff resources
to implement. The time required by staff to review and provide comments to
the Province, as well as understand and implement the updated legislation
takes a significant amount of time. While staff always make an effort to
process applications efficiently, this constant change creates confusion,
delays and uncertainty, and takes away from the time staff should be
spending processing applications. There may be updates required to City
planning policies and this will have a direct human resource impact.

Time and Scheduling
Depending on the outcome of the consultation and the bill receiving Royal
Ascent, works plans and capital budgets for the coming years may need be
adjusted to provide for the required policy document changes.

Technology and Infrastructure
N/A.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 9 of 11

Page 25 of 114

Climate and Environmental Impacts:
There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts.
Certain aspects of Bill 98 will limit the tools available for climate adaptation
and mitigation. Specifically, municipalities will not be permitted to implement
mandatory green development standards or sustainable design as part of a
Planning Act application. A municipality could continue to incentivize these
items through a Community Improvement Plan, if desired.
The proposed legislative amendments also amend Section 16(14) of the
Planning Act, removing the requirement for municipalities to include climate
change policies in their Official Plan. Despite this change, Planning Staff note
that the policies in the PPS and matters of provincial interest outlined in
Section 2 of the Planning Act are not proposed to change, which require the
“mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing
climate”. It is expected that Official Plans will still need to include climate
change policies direction, in order to implement matters of provincial interest
and demonstrate consistency with the PPS.

Communication and Engagement:
City Planning staff attended a meeting with all Grey County planners on April
10, 2026, to discuss the proposed legislative amendments.
The timeline to provide comments is compressed and makes it difficult for
staff to review and provide comments to Council for submission to the
Province for consideration.

Report Developed in Consultation With:
Staff regularly consult a range of professional sources to inform their
analyses and recommendations, including publications from associations
such as the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Ontario
Professional Planners Institute (OPPI), and other legal, financial, and
business consultancies.
All staff within the City’s Planning and Heritage Division provided review and
comments on the changes proposed.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 10 of 11

Page 26 of 114

Attachments
Schedule ‘A’ – Comment Chart – ERO Postings related to Bill 98, Building
Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026
Reviewed by:
Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services
Submission approved by:
Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services (Acting City Manager)
For more information on this report, please contact Sabine Robart, Manager
of Planning & Heritage at srobart@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext.
1236.

Staff Report CS-26-030: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation
Infrastructure Act, 2026
Page 11 of 11

Page 27 of 114

Schedule A -Comment Chart
ERO Postings related to Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026
Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number
ERO 026-0300
Proposed Planning Act,
City of Toronto Act,
2006, Building Code
Act, 1992 and
Municipal Act, 2001
Changes (Schedules 1,
2 and 7 of Bill 98, the
Building Homes and
Improving
Transportation
Infrastructure Act,
2026)

Description Overview

The government is seeking feedback on proposed legislative changes
to the Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, Building Code Act, 1992
and Municipal Act, 2001 through Bill 98, the proposed Building Homes
and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026.



Proposed changes are intended to provide provincial standardization.
While consistency can be beneficial, these changes will impact municipal
flexibility and will require changes to established practices, processes
and plans.

Schedules 1, 2 and 7 of Bill 98 propose a number of amendments to
the Planning Act and City of Toronto Act, 2006 as described in
Background section of the report.



The implementation timeline applicable to Owen Sound would be
January 1, 2029.



Many municipalities, including Owen Sound, are undergoing costly and
time-consuming processes to bring the local policies into conformity with
the last set of provincial changes. These proposed changes will require
these documents to be updated again. Given that the proposed changes
are not substantive policy changes but rather mostly superficial
formatting changes, the implementation timelines should provide for the
changes to be implemented in the next required 5-year review,
especially for smaller municipalities that do not have separate policy
planning divisions.



Clear policy is critically important in ensuring that the Plan can be
understood and allow for timely approvals.



Official Plans need to respond to specific context of communities across
the province. A framework could actually cause redundancy and increase
overlap within a document where context specific matters don’t perfectly
fit within a specific heading of a framework.



The province is asked to confirm if Hazard policies will be part of the
standardized sections. C4 references Hazard. Ensuring the terminology
aligns with the PPS would be helpful and minimize any
misunderstanding.



Using the term “mixed use” areas gives the impression that these uses
are all permitted without any policy context for how these uses should
be developed.

The following amendments are intended to come into force
immediately upon Royal Ascent:


Streamlining and Standardizing Official Plans
o Proposed amendments to the Planning Act would put in
place a standard structure for official plans, to be set out
in Schedule 7. A summary of the structure can be found in
the ERO posting. The proposed structure includes a
standardized set of land use designations to be used in
local official plans, with the ability for the Minister to set
out further direction on implementing any of these
designations, including using two or more subdesignations. Otherwise, the listed designations are the
only ones that will be permitted in official plans.

Comment Period: May 14,
2026




Complementary Changes to Support Implementation of
Streamlining and Standardizing Official Plans
Site Plan: Prohibit Mandatory Municipal Enhanced Development
Standards and Green Building Standards
o remove municipal authority to require certain mandatory
Enhanced Development Standards (EDS) at the lot level,
outside of buildings (e.g., green development standards),

CS-26-030

Staff Comment

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

1
Page 28 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview
that are not specifically required for health or safety (e.g.,
stormwater management)

Staff Comment


o provide clarity that green building/construction standards
are voluntary and cannot be imposed by municipalities.
o remove references to “sustainable design” from site plan
control
o clarify zoning cannot be used to require sustainable
elements including prohibit municipalities from imposing
requirements for infrastructure that supports electric
vehicles.
o expressly provide that mandatory green
building/construction standards are not permitted,
including as part of site plan control, and
o remove provisions that would have authorized
municipalities to require green building standards


What might be more helpful is if there is specific implementing language
for certain provincial policies that should be consistent across the
province, then the province could provide that specific language for
inclusion. In some cases, the province already provides detailed
guidance, but this guidance could become more prescriptive. On-farm
diversified uses would be a good example, how to get municipal
infrastructure across a highway is the opposite.

Green Development Standards


On green development standards, rather than prohibit certain standards,
provide supportive policy guidance and training to municipal staff for
proven standards that are encouraged (such as green solutions for
stormwater management that actually reduce impact and cost to
municipal infrastructure as well) similar for climate change policies.



The City’s Official Plan as recently approved does not include any
enhanced green development standards.

Minimum Lot Sizes – 175 square metres
o Changes are proposed to the Planning Act to create a
regulation-making authority to allow the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing to set a minimum lot size on
parcels of urban residential land, outside the Greenbelt
Area.
o A parcel of urban residential land is defined in the Planning
Act as a parcel within the settlement area of a municipality
that is zoned for residential use (other than ancillary
residential use) and is fully serviced by public sewage and
water.
o Any municipal zoning requirement for minimum frontage
and/or minimum depth that would not allow for the
minimum lot size standard to be met would be
inapplicable.

CS-26-030

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

2
Page 29 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview

Staff Comment

o A regulation under this authority would not apply directly
to the subdivision or consent process, but could be
relevant to such applications


Encumbered Parkland and Privately Owned Public Spaces (POPS)
o Changes are proposed to the Planning Act to facilitate
easements for POPS, authorize municipalities to require
agreements for encumbered land (i.e., strata lands) that
can be registered on title, provide for a credit system
whereby encumbered land and POPS arrangements would
receive a minimum credit of 70%, and establish a
timeframe of 90 days for municipal decisions after which a
developer could appeal a non-decision to the OLT.


ERO 026-0301
Proposed amendments
to the Water and
Wastewater Public
Corporations Act, 2025
and consequential
amendment to the Safe
Drinking Water Act,
2002

Upper-tier Planning Responsibilities in Simcoe County

MMAH is proposing amendments to guarantee public sector ownership, No comment
help ensure contracts and employees that move to a corporation
transfer uninterrupted; and prohibit the transfer of long-term debt
from municipalities to a Water and Wastewater Public Corporation as
well as consequential legislative amendment to the Safe Drinking
Water Act, 2002.

Comment Period: May 14,
2026
ERO 026-0302
Communal drinking
water and wastewater
system municipal
consent requirements

Amendments are proposed to the Municipal Act, 2001 and Safe
Drinking Water Act, 2002, to enable regulations to set out
requirements for municipal consent of non-municipal communal
drinking water and wastewater systems and to require municipalities
to consent if requirements are met.

No comment

Comment Period: May 14,
2026

CS-26-030

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

3
Page 30 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number
ERO 026-0304
Draft Projection
Methodology Guideline
(PMG) to support the
implementation of the
Provincial Planning
Statement, 2024 (PPS,
2024)

Description Overview

To support the implementation of the Provincial Planning Statement,
2024, the Ministry is seeking feedback on a further revised draft
Projection Methodology Guideline to assist planning authorities with
identifying population and employment forecasts and assessing land
needs. This is the second consultation on this matter.

Staff Comment

No comment

The PMG is an important tool in implementing the growth projections
that will guide amount of population and employment for which
municipalities are planning.

Comment Period: May 14,
2026
ERO 026-0305
Proposed Changes to
Various Regulations
Under the Planning Act
to Facilitate the
Electronic Submission
of Information and
Materials to Approval
Authorities and Allow
Notices to be Given
Electronically to the
Province

The government is seeking feedback on proposed amendments to
various regulations under the Planning Act to facilitate the electronic
submission of information and material to approval authorities and
allow notices to be given electronically to the Province.
To support the government’s move towards building a digital
Ontario, the government is seeking feedback on proposed changes to
various regulations under the Planning Act that would:

Digital submissions are generally the norm for most municipalities. Planning
staff anticipate launching the Cloudpermit planning module June 2026.

remove the requirement for information and material to include
an original or certified copy, and

Any standardization that requires changing technology (for example, not using
Cloudpermit) would be very costly and disruptive.



allow required notices to be given electronically to the Ministry
of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

To facilitate digital /electronic submissions across province, the province is
strongly encouraged to focus on the ‘costumer’ experience and ensure ease of
use by multiple different members of the same municipality. The current MTO
portal is not user friendly and does not facilitate easy communication between
various stakeholders.

These proposed changes would facilitate the electronic submission of
information and material to approval authorities. They are intended to
help streamline and expedite review of land use planning matters and
are complementary to the broader government move towards building
a digital Ontario.

ERO 026-0309

The government is seeking feedback on a proposed Minister’s
regulation that would have the effect of removing authority to require,
as a condition of land division approvals, mandatory enhanced
development standards at the lot level (outside of buildings), that are

CS-26-030

Supporting documents should be stamped and signed by the qualified persons
that prepared them.



Comment Period: May 14,
2026

Proposed Regulation to
Prohibit Mandatory
Enhanced Development

On submission items, it is ok for the forms to not require commissioning but
should still require signature. Digital signature capabilities are widely available
in 2026.

City Planning Staff would echo the comments of the County of Grey.
The media briefing document released by the province notes examples of
“landscaping and foliage requirements, soil composition and ornamental and
design considerations” as items which would be prohibited. If the prohibitions

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

4
Page 31 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number
Standards as a
Condition of Land
Division Approvals

Description Overview

Staff Comment

not specifically required for health, safety, accessibility or protection of
adjoining lands (e.g., stormwater management).

limit municipal requirements to those “required for health, safety, accessibility
or protection of adjoining lands (e.g., stormwater management)” then this
would appear to limit many environmental protections, including those that
implement Environmental Impact Studies (e.g., tree preservation, planting,
and native species requirements).

Comment Period: May 14,
2026

Clarification on the definitions of ‘sustainability’ and ‘enhanced development
standards’ are needed, as well as potential carve-outs not only for health,
safety, and accessibility, but also for the natural environment.
ERO 026-0310
Proposal to reform site
plan control under the
Planning Act and the
City of Toronto Act,
2006
Comment Period: May 14,
2026

The following potential reforms to municipal site plan approvals reflect
both Provincial and stakeholder concerns that the site plan process is
taking too long. These potential reforms are intended to generate
discussion on these challenges and work towards solutions that would
enable a faster, more predictable, cost effective and coordinated site
plan approval process.



A pre-consultation process that identifies the information necessary to
make decisions and process an application efficiently.



The City uses a development team approach that brings the key staff in
planning, building and development engineering together to collaborate
and find solutions to move forward.



Matters of accessibility are delegated to staff utilizing a checklist so that
committee schedules and approvals do not hold up timely development.



We use a checklist for complete applications based on pre-consultation.
Everyone knows early on what is expected and conditions don’t change.



When approval is granted, staff immediately offer a meeting with
developers to review conditions and changes so that limited resubmissions are required toward final approval. Robust pre-consultation
often allows for complex developments to proceed with only one
resubmission.



The City has a minor and major site plan approval process which already
provides for a ‘streamed’ approach depending on the scale of the
proposed development.



It is unlikely even the best arbitration process will improve timelines but
having this as an option may be helpful. Who will pay the costs?

Proposed reforms include:
1. Remove site plan control as a land use planning tool in
the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
2. Require municipalities to have a maximum of three circulations
after which a mandatory meeting is triggered with all relevant
municipal department representatives and the applicant to work
through and resolve all outstanding issues.
3. Further scope the site plan review process to a standard site
plan approval checklist of functional aspects of a site (e.g., those
related to health and safety), with use of certified professionals
for acceptance and approval of reports and studies. A
municipality is not permitted to request additional studies and
plans beyond what is included in the standard site plan approval
checklist. If technical and drawing requirements identified in the
checklist are met, site plan approval is issued.
4. Establish or require a municipal arbitration process / site plan
review panel for site plan applications that have exceeded the

CS-26-030

Owen Sound consistently grants site plan approval within the 60-day window
that is mandated. Key to the maintaining the timelines are the following:

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

5
Page 32 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview
government’s 60-day timeline and a specified number of
circulations. Participants in this process would include the
applicant and the municipal development review team. This
would be an alternative to a hearing at the OLT with a goal of
speeding up approvals and cutting down on associated costs. An
arbitration process / site plan review panel decision-making
timeline could be applied to ensure timely decisions on
approvals.
5. Establish or require municipalities to establish different site plan
approval streams for different kinds of proposed development,
with corresponding scope of matters that may be controlled.
This would mean that a “full” site plan process would only be
permitted for larger, complex development initiatives resulting
in fewer matters being regulated through site plan control. Less
complex development would be triaged to a more expedited
stream or could be exempted from site plan control completely.

CS-26-030

Staff Comment


Site Plan control is of critical importance, and it has a profound and
lasting impact on the built environment and how people experience their
community.



Without site plan approval, the building permit process will become a
bottleneck with hold ups relating to items of provincial conformity such
as servicing (water, sanitary, stormwater, roads, etc.), cultural or built
heritage resources, archaeology, brownfields, EIS, endangered species
etc.



Eliminating site plan approval leaves the community significantly at risk
as planning will be short-sighted and not consider cumulative or longterm planning. Who will ensure that traffic is coordinated and planned,
that servicing infrastructure is sufficient, that entrances are safe and
pedestrians have a place to walk. Leaving these matters to chance and
leaving these decisions to developers will have significant and negative
long term community impact.



There are related by-laws and legislation to address prior to building
permit that are usually identified through site plan approval to the
benefit of developers since they are identified earlier in the process than
would be the case if left to permit process. Removing this process
creates ambiguity over who is reviewing plans for compliance with bylaws and applicable law. Building Divisions are good at identifying noncompliance, Planners are good at walking developers through necessary
steps to obtain compliance.



Municipal arbitration processes
-

If implemented, this requirement should include requirement for
provincial Ministries that have permit or approval processes to
attend.

This is only helpful if it is at the request of the developer or
municipal staff. If both developers and municipal staff are working
collaboratively through the process, this could disrupt something
that is working.

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

6
Page 33 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview

ERO 026-0311

The government is seeking feedback on a potential regulation under
the Planning Act to establish a minimum lot size of 175 square metres
Proposed Regulatory
Approach to Establish a on urban residential lands in Ontario.
Minimum Residential
Other considerations would continue to apply to decisions on land
Lot Size in Urban Areas division applications, such as policies in the Provincial Planning
Comment period: May 14, Statement (PPS), 2024 that prohibit development (including lot
creation) in certain circumstances. In addition, the regulation-making
2026
authority would be scoped to zoning and would not apply to
subdivision control, and any municipal zoning requirement for
minimum frontage and/or minimum depth that would not allow for the
minimum lot size standard to be met would be inapplicable. Land
owners would retain the ability to apply for the creation of larger or
smaller lots through the land division process.
The authority for this proposal regulation is being consulted on
concurrently as part of Bill 98 proposed Building Homes and Improving

CS-26-030

Staff Comment


Approving development that ensures “adequate provision and efficient
use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and
waste management systems” per Section 2 of the Planning Act, requires
a municipal public works and engineering departments that are
resourced/staffed to have capacity for development review with strong
understanding of available infrastructure or geological needs.



To have lands development ready and reduce the need for site specific
study of servicing or stormwater capacity would require municipal wide
servicing and infrastructure assessment and construction within urban
areas. Ontario has a significant infrastructure maintenance deficit largely
because of inability to fund infrastructure. Planning for infrastructure and
asset management is very different than finding budget to implement
that plan



Allowing review of critical matters that may impact health or have long
term impacts such as environmental, storm water, traffic, servicing, etc.
ensures that studies are not filed that will leave municipalities finding
solutions to long term problems.



The proposed minimum lot size is 175 square metres (1883 square
feet). This is less than many homes today. Reducing the minimum lot
size should consider:



Servicing

Storm water

Setbacks (especially given the proposed as-of-right variances)

Can this lot size support ARU’s

Is there room for snow storage?

Minimum frontage for access and provision of underground
services

Instead of prescribing a size, prohibit minimum lot size in Official Plans
(so no OPA required to change a lot size). Lot size descriptors in the OP

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

7
Page 34 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview

Staff Comment

Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026 that proposes changes to
the Planning Act ERO #026-0300.

ERO 026-0312
Proposed Changes to
Support Standardizing
of Parkland
Requirements Under
the Planning Act
Comment Period: May 14,
2026

CS-26-030

The government is seeking public feedback on a Minister’s regulation
under the Planning Act to standardize parkland dedication
requirements in Ontario in respect of the conveyance of developeridentified parkland, including encumbered lands and privately owned
public spaces (POPS) arrangements, to implement Bill 23 provisions.

should be allowed, to consider matters such as access, stormwater and
servicing capacity.


Consider impact of a very small minimum lot size in fragmenting lot
fabric making it more difficult to consolidate for larger more dense forms
of development may undermine the ability to build more “missing
middle” housing.



If a minimum lot size of this nature moves forward, it should be applied
only to multiple forms of housing (such as townhouses) to promote more
“missing middle housing” types and deter small single detached lots that
fragment urban blocks.



As noted above, these types of prescriptive regulations will require costly
and time-consuming updates to the local planning documents. Staff time
and municipal resources could be used much more efficiently.

Planning Staff would echo the recommendations of the County of Grey as it
relates to the Province providing template agreements to municipalities to
offset the costs and workload associated with encumbered lands agreements.

The land suitability criteria that are proposed to be prescribed in
regulation would include the following:
1. Ineligible Land – land with any of the following conditions
cannot be required to be conveyed to municipalities for park and
recreational purposes:


Contaminated lands – lands that have in or on them any
contaminants from industrial or other uses that pose a
public health risk



Natural and human-made hazard lands – hazardous lands
and hazardous sites as described in section 5.2 of the
Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 (PPS 2024) as well as
lands affected by human-made hazards as described in
section 5.3 of the PPS 2024.

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

8
Page 35 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview


Staff Comment

Lands within and adjacent to natural heritage features and
areas are eligible on the condition that a park would not
interfere with or compromise the natural heritage features
and areas.



Lands in the Natural Heritage System of the Greenbelt Plan or
in the Natural Core or Natural Linkage Areas of the Oak
Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan or unless in accordance
with policies of the Niagara Escarpment Plan.



Lands that would not support park use – lands that would not
accommodate fill and/or soil depths to accommodate
structural footings as per the Ontario Building Code or
support tree planting.



Lands with financial encumbrances – lands with liens,
charges, etc. registered on title.



Lands that are privately-owned and not accessible to public at
all times.

2. Land Accessibility/Comfort for Use – parkland must be
accessible, visible and comfortable to facilitate public use of it
and, in particular, must be:

ERO 026-0313
Streamlining the
information and
material that planning
authorities can require
as part of a complete
application

CS-26-030



Accessible by all users directly from the public realm and
readily visible from the public realm.



Land must be of a size and shape that is capable of
serving park or public recreational purposes.

The Ministry is seeking feedback on a proposed list of information and
material that has been categorized into two types of studies and when
they could be required:



These studies should not be a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Development
scenarios across the province vary significantly and any list prescribed
by the province may not be able to address all the situations.

1. Core Studies: Core studies are those that could always be
required since planning authorities typically require these to
assess most planning application types (i.e., official plan
amendments, zoning by-law amendments, plans of
subdivision/plans of condominium, site plan control, and/or



The studies identified should be part of a thoughtful pre-consultation and
based on a policy framework, not randomly or needlessly selected.



Having core studies and contingent studies is ok but always these study
requirements need a policy basis.

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

9
Page 36 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview

Comment Period: May 14,
2026

consents). These studies address fundamental planning and
engineering matters such as environmental impacts, existing
servicing capacity, transportation impacts, and public health and
safety.
2. Contingent Studies: Contingent studies could only be required
when a specific on-site or surrounding condition exists in the
local municipality that makes the study relevant for the
consideration of the planning application. For example, certain
studies may only be needed if a subject property is located on or
near airports, rail corridors, significant natural hazards, or major
facilities, or when the property contains particular
environmental, cultural, or resource-based features on site.

ERO 026-0314

The government is seeking feedback on proposed changes to various
regulations under the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act,
2006 to identify additional certified professionals for the purposes of a
complete application.

Comment Period: May 14,
2026

municipalities would be required to accept technical studies and
reports prepared by these professionals in the first instance as
satisfying complete application requirements (without requiring further
review or revisions).

ERO 026-0315

Proposed modifications for official plans of upper-tier municipalities
could include:

Staff Comment


Through the pre-consultation process both the need for studies and their
scope are often clarified. In many cases, the scope can be limited to site
specific matters which save developers time and money in the long run



It may be included, but the employment land conversion justification
may not be in the list in accordance with the updated PPS and Planning
Act for Employment areas.



Additional contingent studies:
-

Visual Impact Study (NEC)

Housing Affordability Study

Lighting/Photometric Study

Appraisal (for purpose of parkland dedication)

Planning Staff would echo the comments of the County of Grey that the
regulation clarify that prescribed professionals can only submit reports under
Proposed Changes to
their prescribed area of expertise. For example, the regulation should be clear
Various Regulations
that an engineer couldn’t also submit a planning report on behalf of a planner,
Under the Planning Act
and the City of Toronto The government is now seeking feedback on adding additional certified with the aim of ‘sheltering’ under their prescribed profession status.
Act, 2006 to Specify
professionals, for example registered landscape architects, for the
Additional “Prescribed
purposes of a complete application. This change would help further
Professions” for the
speed up development approvals and reduce some initial application
Purposes of a Complete costs associated with development proposals.
Application
The prescribing of certified professionals by regulation means that

Consulting on uppertier official plans,
secondary plans, and

CS-26-030



Limiting duplication with official plans of lower-tier municipalities
by creating specific land use designations that only apply to



In areas like Grey County, the City is a lower tier. As a fully serviced,
primary settlement area, within Grey County, the County official plan
primarily defers to the lower tier plan. Matters such as growth
management, archaeology, housing are addressed at a county level. The

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

10
Page 37 of 114

Environment Registry
of Ontario (ERO)
Posting Number

Description Overview

site and area specific
policies

official plans of upper-tier municipalities with planning
responsibilities. For example, this could mean creating a broader
land use designation that would combine the designations of
Neighbourhoods, Mixed Use Areas, and Mixed Use Commercial
Areas into a “Community Areas” designation.

Comment Period: May 14,
2026

We are also consulting on a proposal to create a distinct framework
with clear parameters for secondary plans and SASPs with the aim of
increasing consistency across municipalities while preserving
development permissions.

Staff Comment
role of a upper and lower tier plan should reflect the roles and
responsibilities of the upper and lower tiers. For example, in Owen
Sound, the County of Grey is responsible for housing and these key
policies need to be addressed in the upper tier plan.


Growth areas benefit from the more detailed plans and policies of
secondary plans.



It is hard to imagine the benefit of a stand-alone document. Again,
making developers and staff refer to more than one document is not
necessary. The secondary plan can easily be included in the main official
plan. This allows it to rely on the main policies, for example Residential,
with only the “additional information” included in the secondary plan.



Implementation timing should be tied to existing 5-year review cycle for
efficiency of resource use.



Separating secondary plans from primary OP would require more
repetition in the secondary plan unless there is a guidance document.



A guidebook by the province could provide consistent language for all
municipalities to use in secondary plans while allowing municipalities to
choose what applies where through more specific secondary plan
policies. However, the main OP can also be that guide. Having secondary
plans incorporated into main OPs, even if appendices, helps reduce
repetition (MRP)



Any prescribed changes to Official Plans and Secondary Plan structure
necessitate clear direction on how public input into these amendments is
intended to proceed and whether anyone has the right to appeal
(including agencies and public bodies).

Proposed changes for secondary plans and SASPs could include:




CS-26-030

identifying the types of areas where secondary plans could be
used
separating secondary plans from the primary official plan, so
they would exist as a standalone document while being subject
to the same process requirements
exempting secondary plans from Minister’s approval (lower-tier
municipalities in upper-tier municipalities with planning
responsibilities would not be exempt from approval by the
relevant upper-tier municipality).

Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026

11
Page 38 of 114

Staff Report
Report To:

City Council

Report From:

Jacklyn Iezzi, Senior Planner

Meeting Date:

April 27, 2026

Report Code:

CS-26-031

Subject:

Patio Permit By-law

Recommendations:
THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-031 respecting a Patio Permit
By-law, City Council directs staff to:
1.

Bring forward by-laws to:
a.

Adopt the Patio Permit By-law substantially in the form
attached as Schedule ‘A’ to this report;

Amend the Preservation of Order on Streets By-law No. 1989138 to repeal Section 2.18 in its entirety; and

Amend Delegation of Powers and Duties By-law No. 2014-109
to update the authority to issue patio permits and renewals,
with or without conditions, and refuse to issue or renew a patio
permit, or revoke or suspend a patio permit, and execute patio
agreements, to the Director of Community Services and the
Director of Public Works and Engineering, or their designates,
acting jointly;

Apply to the Ministry of the Attorney General for approval of the set
fines for the Patio Permit By-law as outlined in Schedule ‘B’ of this
report; and

Include the following amendments to the City’s patio fees, as part
of the overall update to the City’s Fees and Charges By-law in July
of 2026:
a.

$50 per business for first-year street furniture, frontage patio,
and/or a curbside patio, as defined by the Patio Permit By-law;
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 1 of 15

11.b Report CS-26-031 from the Senior Planner Re: Patio Permit By-law

This by-law establishes a licensing framework for street furniture and sidewalk patios on public lands within the City of Owen Sound, aiming to enhance pedestrian-friendly environments while ensuring safety and accessibility. It defines specific patio types, including frontage, curbside, and curb lane configurations, and mandates that all operations require a permit issued by the Director of Community Services. The legislation outlines strict application procedures, including site plans and fees, alongside provisions for permit refusal, suspension, or revocation if health, safety, or accessibility standards are compromised. Furthermore, the by-law details operational requirements, inspection protocols, and penalties for non-compliance, ensuring that commercial uses do not negatively impact the streetscape or public well-being.

Page 39 of 114

b.

No fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and/or curbside
patio renewals, where there are no changes proposed to the
street furniture or patio layout, and a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and the term of the agreement
has not expired; and

c.

$100 per parking stall per month, up to a maximum of two (2)
parking stalls for a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by the Patio
Permit By-law.

Highlights:











Patios in the municipal right-of-way in the River District are one
way the City encourages a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly
streetscape.
The City’s current Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
are a 2011 document and warrant review to ensure that universal
accessibility, public safety and the streetscape experience are
enhanced and not negatively impacted by the introduction of a
patio within the right-of-way.
Updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were
presented to the City’s Community Services Committee at its
meeting on March 18, 2026, through Staff Report CS-26-013.
City staff consulted with the River District Board of Management,
the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee, and River
District business owners on the updated guidelines.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit Bylaw.
The purpose of this report is to report on the feedback received
from various stakeholders that has been considered in the final bylaw and present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment:
Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development,
planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that
contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents
and tourists.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 2 of 15

Page 40 of 114

Previous Report/Authority:
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines (2011)
Staff Report CS-22-065 – Patio Funding Options
Staff Report CS-23-051 – River District Patios – Ontario Traffic Council
Guidelines for Patios within the Right of Way
Staff Report CS-26-013 – Draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines

Background:
Sidewalk patios are outdoor extensions to existing commercial
establishments that are located on City-owned property, such as the
sidewalk or municipal on-street parking spaces. Street furniture and sidewalk
patios are often located within the City’s River District and Harbour area.
At its meeting on September 15, 2021, Community Services Committee
subsequently adopted on September 27, 2021, through adoption of the
"THAT the Community Services Committee recommends that City
Council direct staff to:
1.

Bring forward a report to a future Community Services
Committee meeting respecting the potential of facilitating
sidewalk patios through the Community Improvement Plan;
and,

2.

Undertake a review of the Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio
Design Guidelines."

Over the last three months, Planning staff have been working together with
the City’s Development Team including Engineering Services, the Building
Division, Clerks staff, Fire Prevention, and the River District Coordinator to
Services Committee on May 18, 2022.
Updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines were presented to the
Community Services Committee at its meeting on March 18, 2026, through
Staff Report CS-26-013. The Community Services Committee adopted the
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 3 of 15

Page 41 of 114

adopted on April 13, 2026, through adoption of the meeting minutes:
"THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-013 respecting the
draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, the Community
Services Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to:
1.

Consult with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee and River District business owners with previous
patio approvals on the draft guidelines; and

2.

Bring forward a report including input received from
stakeholders and a draft sidewalk patio by-law for
consideration to the April 27, 2026, Regular Council
Meeting."

Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines at its meeting on
March 11, 2026 and the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee
on April 17, 2026. Staff requested feedback from all River District business
owners on the updated guidelines through the River District newsletter on
March 24, 2026.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit By-law attached
as Schedule ‘A’, with a purpose of:
a.

Encouraging the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants,
cafes, and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street
furniture and amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian
friendly built environment, particularly within the City’s River
District and Harbour Area; and

b.

Ensuring that universal accessibility, public safety, and the
streetscape experience are enhanced and not negatively
impacted by the introduction of a patio within the municipal
right-of-way.

As Council will recall, in Spring of 2022, the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC)
released Restaurant Patio Guidelines that were developed by experts in the
transportation industry and are the best practice for managing restaurant
patios within a road authority’s right-of-way. The proposed Patio Permit Bylaw implements the OTC Guidelines, consistent with the approach of other
municipalities across Ontario.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 4 of 15

Page 42 of 114

The purpose of this report is to outline the feedback received from various
stakeholders that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law and to
present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Analysis and Options:
This section summarizes the feedback received from various stakeholders
that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law:

By-law Format
City Planning staff consulted with the Clerks Division on updated draft Street
Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines on March 3, 2026. Based on the
feedback received, it was recommended that the updated guidelines be
transitioned to a by-law. This approach allows a mechanism for enforcement,
should a patio be placed illegally within the municipal right-of-way, and is
consistent with the approach of other municipalities across Ontario including
the City of Ottawa, the Municipality of Kincardine, and the Township of
Loyalist, which all have their own respective sidewalk patio by-laws.
The Patio Permit By-law is attached as Schedule ‘A’ to this report. In
adopting the Patio Permit By-law, it is necessary to repeal Section 2.18 of
By-law 1989-138, being a By-law to Regulate the Use of and Preservation of
Order on Streets, to remove provisions related to outdoor patios that are in
conflict with the new by-law.
Following adoption of the Patio Permit By-law, Planning staff will work with
Communications staff to create a more visual, user-friendly guide to the bylaw to assist staff and patio operators in the ongoing administration of the
program.

Fines for Non-Compliance
Staff are recommending the use of set fines for non-compliance. Wherever
possible, infractions that can be applied to both the patio operator and the
property owner will be applied to both. It is particularly important that the
patio operator be held accountable as they ultimately own, operate, and
manage the sidewalk patio.
Schedule ‘B’ outlines the proposed infractions and associated set fines. The
maximum set fine that is permitted is $1,000. The set fines in the
attachment do not include the administrative costs that are added onto the
fines (victim surcharge added by the Provincial Offences Court). The
proposed set fines align with similar offences in other regulatory by laws. In
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 5 of 15

Page 43 of 114

addition, the fines need to be high enough so that patio operators don't
consider a fine as the cost of doing business.
Should Council approve the proposed set fines, staff will apply to the Ministry
of the Attorney General for final approval. It is worth noting that tickets can
be issued each day that there is a contravention of the by-law, and this
would be communicated to the owner as part of the application process.
As with many other by-laws, circumstances in which staff would lay fines
would be rare and used as a last resort. Staff would first work cooperatively
with the patio operator to achieve compliance with the by-law.

Roadside Barriers
As described in Staff Report CS-26-013, the Patio Permit By-law implements
the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC) Restaurant Patio Guidelines released in
Spring of 2022 for patios located within the right-of-way, particularly as it
relates to the use of roadside barriers for Curb Lane Patios located within an
on-street parking space or a curb lane.
The Patio Permit By-law permits a Curb Lane Patio within a maximum of two
(2) on-street parking spaces or a curb lane only on roadways with:




A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.
No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).
On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

The City’s roadways of 2nd Avenue East, 3rd Avenue East, 8th Street East, and
9th Street East would meet these requirements.
Based on these road characteristics, the OTC Guidelines require the
installation of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware) tested
barriers to be installed within the road allowance to mitigate the risk of an
errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons seated at
tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.
Comments received from the City’s Director of Public Works and
Engineering, as it relates to roadside barriers are as follows:
The OTC specifies that a minimum of TL-1 rated barriers be employed
in this scenario, however some barriers require specific setbacks to
accommodate deflection from impacts, even at relatively low speeds
such as 50 km/h. This is a critical factor; barricades work to keep
vehicles on the road by absorbing the force of impact, typically at an
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 6 of 15

Page 44 of 114

oblique angle (i.e. a glancing blow). Some absorb it by being able to
withstand the impact, usually through sheer force of gravity
(weight/mass); an example of this is the concrete jersey barrier.
Others absorb the force by cradling the vehicle and deflecting it back
onto the road. This type of barrier is meant to stretch or push
backwards and angle the vehicle back into a straight trajectory. This
principle is most commonly seen in the post and steel cable or steel wbeam guiderails on highways. These barriers, due to their designed
deflection, require varying depths of setbacks to be able to function
properly. Anything or anyone caught within this deflection zone is in
extreme danger should the barrier be struck.
For this reason, the best and recommended choice in this case is the
concrete jersey barrier style, having the least horizontal displacement,
and therefore a minimal setback zone. Although the minimum clear
zone required behind a particular type of barrier varies from product to
product, in general, water or sand-filled jersey barriers would be next
best, as they have a relatively small required clear zone at 0.5 m.
However, these also require regular patrols to ensure they remain
adequately filled. For comparison, ‘Urban Barrier’ has the largest
displacement distance, at approximately 2 metres, even at 50 km/h.
An added benefit of using the concrete jersey barrier is that it is the
most readily available style in this area. At the end of the day, any
MASH rated barrier is acceptable, but any barrier used must be
installed according to manufacturer’s specifications. Notably, any
clear/buffer zone required between the barrier and the patio must be
observed.
A requirement that roadside barriers be installed according to manufacturer’s
specifications has been included in the Patio Permit By-law, consistent with
comments received from the Director of Public Works and Engineering.
Examples of TL-1, TL-2, and TL-3 roadside barriers that would meet or
exceed the requirements of the OTC Guidelines, and the associated cost of
rental, are attached as Schedule ‘C’. The supply, installation, and removal of
roadside barriers within the City’s road allowance will be required to be at
the expense of the patio operator. A user pay system is consistent with the
approach of other municipalities in Ontario, including the Municipality of
Meaford (see Staff Report DEV2025-29). As demonstrated in Schedule ‘C’,
costs associated with roadside barrier rental are expected to be between
$2,100 and $2,500 for a six (6) month season (May 1 to October 31), based
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 7 of 15

Page 45 of 114

on a Curb Lane Patio located within one (1) on-street parking space, and
depending on the type of barrier selected by the operator.
Comments from the Community Services Committee were also received that
question whether the OTC Restaurant Patio Guidelines are voluntary versus
mandatory and noted concerns with the appearance of the roadside barriers
within the downtown.
Traditionally, the City has permitted patios within on-street parking spaces
with the installation of two (2) curb stops and planter boxes provided at
either end of the patio. Based on OTC guidance, this type of patio delineation
is not sufficient for providing any level of protection for restaurant patrons or
staff against an errant vehicle. Ultimately, staff cannot recommend that
patios be permitted within on-street parking without the installation of
proper barricades, in the interest of maintaining public health and safety.
While compliance with the OTC Guidelines is not provincially
legislated, it is consistent with the advice of the City’s insurer and is
the practice followed widely by other municipalities in Ontario.
As it relates to the appearance of roadside barriers, the Patio Permit By-law
would permit a patio operator to utilize hanging plant materials to buffer the
appearance of the barrier, though this would not be a mandatory
requirement.

Temporary Encroachment Permit
The Patio Permit By-law clarifies that the provisions of the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law do not apply to street furniture and sidewalk patios,
where a patio permit has been obtained and a patio agreement has been
executed with the City.
A temporary road closure in accordance with the Ontario Traffic Manual Book
7 will be required for Curb Lane Patios to facilitate installation and removal of
the required roadside barriers. A Temporary Traffic Control Plan is required
to be submitted as part of a complete patio permit application for a Curb
Lane Patio, and the City’s Engineering Services Division will provide review
and comment through this process. A separate temporary encroachment
permit and fee is not required.
Standard conditions of the City’s Temporary Encroachment Permit, where
applicable, will be incorporated into the City’s patio agreement, in
accordance with comments received from the City’s Engineering Services
Division.
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 8 of 15

Page 46 of 114

Streamlining
In consulting with the City’s River District Coordinator, Planning staff have
identified an opportunity to streamline the application approval process for
the placement of street furniture and sidewalk patios within the right-of-way.
Specifically, the proposed Patio Permit By-law provides a process for patio
permit renewals, where there is no change in layout and a patio agreement
with the City is in effect.
An application for a patio permit renewal is limited to the following:
1.

Proof of liability insurance in the amount of $5,000,000,
indemnifying the City as an additional insured.

2.

A copy of the patio operator’s liquor licence, if applicable.

3.

For a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers.

As discussed in the Fees and Charges section of this report, Planning staff
are also recommending a reduced fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and
curbside patio renewals.

Delegation and Appeals Process
In 2021, City Council delegated approval authority for sidewalk patios to the
City Manager, in consultation with the Director of Community Services,
Director of Public Works and Engineering, and the Manager of Planning and
Heritage, and subject to AGCO approval for a licenced patio in accordance
with the provisions established in the Province’s Stage 2 re-opening
guidelines applicable at the time, including:






Design, layout, and placement.
Execution of agreement.
Provision of correspondence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission
of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no objection to extension of liquor
licences.
Waive all fees.

Comments from the Community Services Committee questioned whether the
City Manager is the appropriate delegate for sidewalk patios. Staff note that
the delegation and certain limits thereof, were put in place during the
COVID-19 pandemic, to provide staff flexibility in responding to a rapidly
changing emergency situation.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 9 of 15

Page 47 of 114

Certain aspects of the delegation warrant review in the context of the
updated Patio Permit By-law, however, staff delegated approval for sidewalk
patios has generally worked well and resulted in improved customer service
to patio operators. With delegation, staff were generally able to issue patio
approvals within seven to ten business days.
The Patio Permit By-law proposes that the authority to issue patio permits
and renewals, with or without conditions, and refuse to issue or renew a
patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio permit, be delegated to the
Director of Community Services and the Director of Public Works and
Engineering, or their designates, acting jointly.
The delegation of patio permits and renewals to senior management
continues to ensure a streamlined approvals process that patio operators are
accustomed to. Having both the Director of Community Services and the
Director of Public Works and Engineering serve as the delegates ensures that
input from both Planning and Engineering is considered in the approvals
process.
The authority to execute patio agreements and provide correspondence to
the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no
objection to the extension of liquor licences for a licenced patio are also
proposed to remain delegated to staff and conferred to the Director of
Community Services and the Director of Public Works and Engineering, as
these are administrative functions necessary for ensuring implementation of
the Patio Permit By-law. The authority to waive patio fees and reference to
the Province’s Stage 2 reopening under the limits of the current delegation
will be removed as part of the recommended update to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law, as these are no longer relevant.
Staff note that there are limited circumstances in which a patio permit or
renewal would be refused, suspended or revoked, as set out in Section 29 of
the by-law, however, in the interest of maintaining procedural fairness, the
by-law establishes an appeals process for patio permit refusals or revocation
that would be considered by the City Manager.

Fees and Charges
In May of 2022, the Community Services Committee considered Staff Report
CS-22-065, respecting Patio Funding Options, and recommended that City
Council direct staff to bring forward an amendment to the City’s Fees and
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 10 of 15

Page 48 of 114

The City’s current fees for street furniture and sidewalk patios are as follows:
Patio Type

Current Fee

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
amenity strip

$50 per business, per year

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
parking stalls

$200 for the first two (2) parking
stalls, $100 per each additional stall.

The current fee structure warrants an update to, among other matters, align
the fees with the new patio definitions provided under the Patio Permit Bylaw. The fees proposed by staff are as follows:
Patio Type

Proposed Fee

First-year street furniture, frontage
patio, or curbside patio, as defined
by the Patio Permit By-law

$50 per business

Street furniture, frontage patio, or
curbside patio renewals

No fee where the following
conditions are met:
a. No change to the street
furniture or frontage patio
and/or curbside patio layout is
proposed.
b. A patio agreement has been
executed with the City and the
term of such agreement has
not expired.
For clarity, if either of the above
noted conditions are not satisfied,
the $50 first-year application fee
would apply.

Curb Lane Patio (new or renewal)

$100 per parking stall per month,
maximum two (2) parking stalls.

The intent of the revised street furniture and sidewalk patio fees
recommended through Staff Report CS-22-065, was to ensure that street
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 11 of 15

Page 49 of 114

furniture and patios proposed within the limits of the sidewalk (i.e., at the
building face or curbside) were attainable for businesses, particularly those
not centered around food service. The updated fee structure proposed by
staff maintains this intent and, subject to conditions, provides a reduced fee
for street furniture, frontage patio, and curbside patio renewals, to further
encourage this type of patio within the downtown to activate the streetscape.
Fees for Curb Lane Patios are proposed to be increased to $100 per parking
stall per month, to align with the City’s existing fee to rent an on-street
parking space ($50 per week). Parking stalls are capped at a maximum of
two (2), to align with the definition of a Curb Lane Patio provided by the
Patio Permit By-law. A greater fee for Curb Lane Patios is appropriate, given
the larger size/scale that results in additional review and monitoring by City
staff.

Insurance
The Patio Permit By-law continues to require that patio operators carry and
provide proof of liability insurance for the operation of the street furniture or
patio, indemnifying the City as the owner of the public lands on which the
patio or street furniture is situated. The amount of liability insurance required
has been increased from $2,000,000, to $5,000,000, consistent with
comments received from the City’s insurer, the Purchasing and Claims
Coordinator, and the Engineering Services Division.

Accessibility
As outlined in Staff Report CS-26-013, patio operators are required to
provide a patio layout that maintains a sufficient accessible route on the
sidewalk for pedestrians. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act
(AODA) requires the width of the accessible route to be a minimum of 1.5
metres. The OTC Guidelines for Restaurant Patios and other municipalities
with updated guidelines (e.g., City of Guelph, City of Kingston), require the
accessible route to be 1.8 metres.
Planning staff consulted with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee on the desired width of the accessible route at its meeting on
April 17, 2026. Based on this consultation, the Patio Permit By-law requires a
patio operator to design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient accessible route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width, as follows:

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 12 of 15

Page 50 of 114

a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street
East: 1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres.

The intent of the by-law is to require that a greater accessible route be
provided where the width of the right-of-way is larger.

Resource Alignment:
Financial Resources
There are no anticipated impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the Patio
Permit By-law.
It is recommended that staff be directed to update the City’s existing fees
and charges for patios to, among other matters, align with the patio
definitions provided under the new by-law.
Fees generated from street furniture and sidewalk patios are generally low,
as the City receives a low number of applications each year.

Human Resources
Processing of patio applications will be completed within the existing
operating budget. The Planning & Heritage Division administers the program
on an annual basis, with input from the City’s Development Team, including
Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire.
It is recommended that approval authority for patios continue to be
delegated to staff. Amendments are recommended to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law to delegate approval authority for patios and the
execution of patio agreements to the Director of Community Services and
the Director of Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly.
Processing timelines for patio applications is dependent on the size and
location of a proposed patio, however, with an updated by-law, it is expected
that application review timelines will be reduced. The by-law also provides a
more streamlined approach for street furniture and patio renewals.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 13 of 15

Page 51 of 114

Time and Scheduling
The updated Patio Permit By-law has been completed as part of the Planning
& Heritage Division’s 2026 Work Plan.

Technology and Infrastructure
The City’s Cloudpermit system will be used to manage patio applications
beginning in 2027 and on a go forward basis.

Climate and Environmental Impacts:
There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts.

Communication and Engagement:
The draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were circulated to
the City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, Engineering
Services, Environmental Services, and Clerks staff, as well as the City’s River
District Coordinator, Communications staff, City Fire Prevention Services.
and Police Services for review and comment on February 10, 2026.
An internal staff meeting to discuss the draft guidelines and obtain feedback
was held on February 19, 2026.
Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
draft guideline at its meeting on March 11, 2026, the Community Services
Committee on March 18, 2026, and the Grey County Joint Accessibility
Advisory Committee on April 17, 2026.
Feedback on the updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines was
requested from all River District Business owners on March 24, 2026 through
the River District newsletter.
The Patio Permit By-law was developed in consultation with the City’s
Manager of Legislative Services and By-law Enforcement.
Feedback received from the various stakeholders is outlined in the Analysis
section of this report and has been incorporated into the final by-law.

Report Developed in Consultation With:
In updating the draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, staff consulted the following
documents:
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 14 of 15

Page 52 of 114











Ontario Traffic Council Restaurant Patio Guidelines within the Right
of Way (April 2022)
City of Guelph Seasonal Patio Program Guidelines
City of Kingston Street Patio Standards and Application Guide
Municipality of Meaford Corporate Policy – Commercial Patio on
Municipal Lands
Prince Edward County Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
City of London Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
Municipality of Kincardine By-law No. 2021-069, being a by-law to
regulation seasonal on-street patios.
City of Ottawa Right of Way Patio By-law No. 2023-230
Loyalist Township Patio Licence By-law 2012-025

Attachments:
Schedule ‘A’ – Patio Permit By-law
Schedule ‘B’ – Set Fines and Short Form Wording
Schedule ‘C’ – Roadside Barriers
Reviewed by:
Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning & Heritage
Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services
Submission approved by:
Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services (Acting City Manager)
For more information on this report, please contact Jacklyn Iezzi, Senior
Planner at planning@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1261.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 15 of 15

Page 53 of 114

By-law No. 2026-XXX

Patio Permit By-law
Table of Contents

Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope .............................................. 1
Part II. Interpretation ....................................................................... 2
Schedules ......................................................................................... 2
Part III. Administration .................................................................... 3
Delegation ........................................................................................ 3
Part IV. Permit Required ................................................................... 4
Permit required ................................................................................. 4
Part V. Application for Permit ............................................................ 4
Submitting an application ................................................................... 4
Issuing licences ................................................................................. 6
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation .......................................... 6
Grounds ........................................................................................... 6
Notice .............................................................................................. 7
Danger to health or safety .................................................................. 8
Appeals ............................................................................................ 8
Part VII. Operation Requirements ..................................................... 8
Timing .............................................................................................. 8
Responsibilities .................................................................................. 8
General Prohibitions ........................................................................... 9
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice ....................................... 10
Inspections ..................................................................................... 10
Obstruction ..................................................................................... 10
Orders ............................................................................................ 10
Notice ............................................................................................ 11
Part IX. Offence and Penalty ........................................................... 11
Part X. Effective Date ...................................................................... 12

Page 54 of 114

Consolidated Version
Last revised on XXX
Revision History:

Passed On:

2026-XXX (original)

Description of
amendment
-

Consolidated for Convenience Only
This is a consolidation copy of a City of Owen Sound By-law for convenience
and information. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this
by-law, it is not an official version or a legal document. The original by-law
should be consulted for all interpretations and applications on this subject.
For more information or to view by-laws please contact the Clerks
Department.

Page 55 of 114

The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound
By-law No. 2026-XXX
A By-law to licence, regulate and govern
the construction, erection and operation of
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patios on Public Lands
WHEREAS subsection 5(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, c. 25 (the
“Municipal Act”) provides that a municipal power shall be exercised by by-law;
and
WHEREAS subsection 11(2) of the Municipal Act authorizes the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Owen Sound (the “City”) to pass by-laws with respect
to the public assets of the Town, for the economic, social and environmental
well-being of the Town, and for the health, safety and well-being of persons; and
WHEREAS section 11(3) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to pass bylaws respecting the following spheres of jurisdiction: highways, structures,
parking and business licensing;
WHEREAS sections 23.1 to 23.6 of the Municipal Act authorize City Council to
delegate its powers and duties under the Municipal Act or any other Act to a
person or body, subject to the restrictions set out in the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS it is the opinion of City Council that the powers and duties being
delegated in this by-law are of a minor nature, in accordance with sections
23.2(4) and 23.2(5) of the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS section 151(1) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to provide
for a system of licences with respect to a business; and
bring forward the subject by-law for approval, in consideration of staff report CS26-031;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OWEN
SOUND HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope
Short Title
1.

The by-law may be referred to as the “Patio Permit By-law” and, when so
referenced, includes all future amendments, unless otherwise specified.

Purpose
2.

This by-law has been enacted to:
a.

encourage the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants, cafes,
and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street furniture and
amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian friendly builtenvironment, particularly within the City’s River District and Harbour
area; and

b.

ensure that universal accessibility, public safety, and the streetscape
experience are enhanced and not negatively impacted by the
introduction of a patio on public lands.
Page 56 of 114

PAGE 2

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Scope
3.

This by-law applies to the City of Owen Sound in its entirety. However, for
clarity, patios are only permitted where the City’s Zoning By-law would
permit a commercial use and where there is an area on adjacent public
lands that can meet the requirements of this by-law.
Part II. Interpretation

Headings
4.

The division of this by-law into parts and the insertion of headings are for
convenient reference only and do not affect the interpretation of the bylaw.

Gender and Number
5.

In this by-law, unless the contrary intention is indicated, words used in the
singular include the plural and words imparting a gender include all
genders, where applicable.

References to Applicable Law
6.

All references to applicable law are ambulatory and apply as amended,
extended or re-enacted from time to time.

Schedules
7.

Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements is attached to and forms part of this
by-law.

Severability
8.

In the event any provisions of this by-law are deemed invalid or void, in
whole or in part, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

Definitions
9.

For the purposes of this by-law:
“Accessible Route(s)” means a continuous, unobstructed path connecting
accessible elements and spaces;
“Cane Detectable” means leading edges that are within a cane sweep area;
“City” means the City of Owen Sound and a reference to the City is a
reference to the geographical area or to The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound as the context requires;
“City Manager” means the City Manager of The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Contiguous to frontage” means the patio space is located directly in front
of or adjacent to the building that houses the business for which the patio
application was approved;
“Curbside Patio” means a patio located on the exterior edge of the
sidewalk, adjacent to the curb, with an Accessible Route located between
the building and the patio;
“Curb Lane Patio” means a patio located within a maximum of two (2) onstreet parking spaces;
Page 57 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

“Director” means the Director of Community Services and Director of
Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly, and includes their designates;
“Frontage Patio” means a patio located immediately adjacent to the
building but extending beyond the front property line onto public lands;
“Patio” means a seasonal structure or installation of street furniture on
public lands for commercial use and includes:
a.

A Frontage Patio;

b.

A Curbside Patio; and,

c.

A Curb Lane Patio;

“Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership or association, and
their heirs, executors, assignees and administrators;
“Permit” means a permit for a patio issued under this by-law and may be
referred to as a Patio Permit;
“Public lands” means any property under the care and control of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Officer” means any person authorized by the City to enforce by-laws and
includes a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer appointed to enforce the bylaws of the City or a police officer while in the course of their duties;
“Operator” means the person or business applying for a permit or renewal
of a permit under this by-law;
“Owner” means the person(s) on title as the owner(s) of a building or
parcel of land identified on a parcel register from the Land Registry Office;
“Street Furniture” means those objects and pieces of equipment that work
to enrich the utility and aesthetic value of the street and includes, but is
not limited to, benches, flowerpots, retail or merchandise tables, and patio
furniture; and
“Tactile Tape” means a textured, adhesive strip applied to the surface of
the sidewalk and perimeter of a Patio that is yellow or white in colour, to
provide touch-based guidance or warning cues, especially for people with
visual impairments.
Part III. Administration
Delegation
10.

The administration of this by-law is assigned to the Director who will
generally perform the administrative functions conferred upon them by this
by-law, and without limitation may:
a.

delegate any responsibilities to an employee of the City, conferred to
the Director under this by-law;

b.

receive and process all applications for patio permits and renewals of
patio permits under this by-law;

c.

issue patio permits and renew patio permits in accordance with the
provisions of this by-law;

Page 58 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

impose conditions on patio permits at the time of issuance, renewal
or any other time during the patio season, in accordance with this
by-law and as necessary to give effect to this by-law;

e.

execute patio agreements between operators and the City required
in fulfillment of a condition of a patio permit or renewal, in
accordance with this by-law; and

f.

refuse to issue or renew a patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio
permit, in accordance with this by-law.
Part IV. Permit Required

Permit required
11.

No person shall construct, erect or operate a patio, or cause a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated, or authorize a patio to be constructed,
erected, or operated, without first obtaining a permit in accordance with
the provisions of this by-law.
Part V. Application for Permit

Submitting an application
12.

The Director will receive, process, and review all applications for patio
permits and renewals under this by-law.

13.

No Operator is entitled to apply for a permit or to renew a permit if in the
year prior to the application, the Operator had their permit revoked by the
Director.

14.

Between January 1 and April 1 of each year, an Operator shall file an
application for a patio permit in such form and detail as the Director may
prescribe from time to time, which application shall include, at the
Operator’s cost, the following:
a.

A completed application form that includes the name, telephone
number, and email address of the Operator and owner, if not the
same person, along with the address of the proposed patio.

b.

A detailed site plan and elevation drawings, which may be a hand
drawn sketch, submitted in .jpeg or .pdf format provided it is fully
dimensioned, showing:

c.

i.

the location and dimensions of the proposed patio;

ii.

the premises to which the patio will be appurtenant;

iii.

the location of all relevant lot lines; and

iv.

all existing surface features located between the premises and
the roadway.

A description of the proposed patio and of all materials to be used in
the construction and operation of the patio, including all
appurtenances such as:
i.

canopies, umbrellas, and/or awnings;

ii.

platforms;

iii.

railings and/or fencing;

iv.

any proposed landscaping, such as ground or hanging planter
boxes;
Page 59 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

v.

lighting;

vi.

signage;

vii.

waste storage;

viii.

heaters;

ix.

furniture, including, without limitation, tables, chairs, picnic
tables or benches, and including the proposed material and
colour of such furniture; and

x.

roadside barriers where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed;

d.

photos of the proposed patio location and existing streetscape;

e.

a copy of the Operator’s business licence;

f.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable;

g.

where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed, a Traffic Control Plan for the
installation and removal of roadside barriers in accordance with
Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7; and

h.

any other information required by the Director to approve the
application and determine compliance with this by-law.

15.

Where a patio permit is approved by the Director, the Operator shall enter
into a patio agreement with the City, which may specify conditions for setup and operation of the patio, among other matters. The term of the patio
agreement shall be a minimum of one (1) year and may be up to a
maximum of five (5) years, at the sole discretion of the Director.

16.

The Operator shall provide evidence of insurance, satisfactory to the
Director and in accordance with the provisions of subsection 37.b. of this
by-law, prior to the issuance of a patio permit.

17.

An Operator shall apply for a patio permit for each season that the
applicant wishes to place a patio within the municipal right-of-way.

18.

Notwithstanding section 17 above, the Director will consider approval of
patio permit renewals, where there is no proposed change to the patio
layout, including any appurtenances thereto, iand a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and remains in force and effect.

19.

A patio permit that is not renewed prior to the end date specified in the
patio agreement with the City is no longer valid and requires a new
application.

20.

An application for a patio permit renewal pursuant to section 18 of this bylaw shall be submitted between January 1 and April 1 of each year, and
accompanied by the following, at the Operator’s cost:

21.

a.

proof of insurance, satisfactory to the Director and in accordance
with the provisions of subsection 37(b) of this by-law;

b.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable; and

c.

for a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers in accordance with Ontario Traffic
Manual Book 7.

Upon submission of a complete patio permit application or renewal by the
Operator, as the case may be, the Director will calculate the required fees
based on the patio type and provide an invoice to the Operator. The
Page 60 of 114

PAGE 6

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Operator shall pay the fees owing in full by April 15 of each year
otherwise, the patio permit will be refused.
22.

The application fee is non-refundable regardless of whether or not the
Director approves a permit and regardless of whether or not the Director
imposes any conditions on the permit.

23.

Patio permit applications and renewals are required to be submitted via the
City’s online permitting system in effect at the time of the application or
renewal.

24.

The Director shall request comments from the City’s Development Team,
including Planning, Building, and Engineering Services staff, as well as City
Fire Prevention and Police Services, prior to making a determination on a
new patio application or renewal, as the case may be.

25.

The City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, and
Engineering Services staff, as well as City Fire Prevention and Police
Services are responsible for reviewing applications and providing feedback
on any revisions required prior to approval. To determine approval, City
staff will evaluate an application based on:

26.

a.

compliance with the requirements of this by-law;

b.

suitability of the location and any impacts on existing services;

c.

accessibility of the patio and surrounding area;.

d.

safety of the patio set-up, location, and materials; and

e.

design quality and functionality of the patio layout.

The submission of an application for a permit, including the related fee(s)
does not entitle an Operator to construct, erect, or operate a patio. The
Operator is only entitled to construct, erect, and operate a patio once the
permit has been issued under the provisions of this by-law, including the
execution of a patio agreement pursuant to section 15, and a satisfactory
inspection by the City’s Building Division in accordance with section 37.d.

Issuing licences
27.

When an application for a patio or renewal is made in accordance with Part
V of this by-law and the Operator meets all the requirements of this bylaw, the Director will issue a permit.

28.

The permit may include one or more conditions to be fulfilled by the
Operator, at the discretion of the Director.
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation

Grounds
29.

The Director may refuse to issue or renew or may suspend or revoke a
patio permit where:
a.

the Operator has failed to pay the required fees, pursuant to section
21 of this by-law;

b.

an application or other document provided to the Director by an
Operator contains a false statement or false information;

c.

the Operator’s existing permit has been suspended or revoked
pursuant to this by-law;

Page 61 of 114

PAGE 7

30.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

the Operator is indebted to the City in respect of fines, penalties,
judgements, outstanding property taxes, or any other amounts
owing;

e.

the Operator, or the property to which the patio is accessory, is
subject to an order, or orders made pursuant to applicable law,
including but not limited to a City by-law, the Building Code Act, the
Fire Protection and Prevention Act, and the Health Protection and
Promotion Act;

f.

the Operator does not comply with any of the requirements of:
i.

this by-law and all other applicable City laws or by-laws
including, but not limited to, the City’s Noise Bylaw,
Encroachment By-law, Zoning By-law, Property Standards Bylaw, and Waste Management By-law;

ii.

the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, as applicable;
or

iii.

any other federal or provincial laws affecting the operation of
the patio;

g.

the Operator has three (3) or more contraventions of City laws or
by-laws within a six-month period or four (4) or more contraventions
of City laws or by-laws within a calendar year;

h.

the permit was issued in error or granted based on incorrect or false
information; or

i.

the Director becomes aware of a fact or facts that, if known at the
time of the application, may have resulted in the Director refusing to
issue the permit.

Where the Operator’s insurance policy expires, is cancelled, or is otherwise
terminated, the applicable patio permit and patio agreement are
automatically suspended effective on the date of such expiration,
cancellation or termination and remain suspended until such insurance has
been reinstated.

Notice
31.

Where the Director refuses to issue or renew a patio permit or where the
Director elects to suspend or revoke a permit:
a.

the Director will send written notice advising the Operator of the
refusal, suspension or revocation of the permit;

b.

the written notice will be sent in accordance with the notice
provisions set out in section 50 of this by-law;

c.

the written notice will:
i.

set out the grounds for the refusal, suspension or revocation;

ii.

be signed;

iii.

indicate the final date and time by which the applicant or
licensee may appeal the decision of the Director and the
method for doing so; and

iv.

indicate the appeals fee, as set out in the City’s Fees and
Charges By-law.

Page 62 of 114

PAGE 8

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Danger to health or safety
32.

Notwithstanding section 31 above, the Director, if satisfied that the
continuation of a permit poses a danger to the health or safety of any
person, may for the time and on such conditions as are considered
appropriate, suspend a permit for not more than fourteen (14) days
without a hearing. If, after the suspension period has elapsed, the Director
is satisfied that the continuation of a permit will continue to pose a danger
to the health or safety of any person, they may further suspend for not
more than fourteen (14) days or revoke the permit.

Appeals
33.

An Operator who has been refused a permit in accordance with section 29
may appeal the refusal to the City Manager by submitting a request for
review to the office of the City Manager within fourteen (14) days of the
refusal.

34.

Where a permit is refused, the Director will advise the applicant of the
appeal option and provide further information on the process in effect at
the time of the refusal.

35.

The decision of the City Manager issued under this by-law is final.
Part VII. Operation Requirements

Timing
36.

No person may construct, erect or operate a patio or allow a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated between November 1 of any year and
April 30 of the following year.

Responsibilities
37.

Every Operator shall:
a.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in compliance with
applicable laws, including but not limited to:
i.

the Health Protection and Promotion Act;

ii.

the Fire Protection and Prevention Act;

iii.

the Building Code Act;

iv.

the Liquor Licence and Control Act;

v.

the Cannabis Control Act;

vi.

the Smoke Free Ontario Act;

vii.

the City’s:
1. Fireworks By-law;
2. Noise By-law;
3. Nuisance By-law;
4. Property Standards By-law;
5. Snow Removal By-law;
6. Unauthorized Parking By-law;
7. Waste Management By-law; and
8. Zoning By-law;
Page 63 of 114

PAGE 9

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

b.

carry a minimum of five-million dollars ($5,000,000) liability
insurance for the operation of their patio, indemnifying the City as
the owner of the public lands on which the patio is situated;

c.

construct, erect and operate their patio in accordance with the
associated patio agreement, where executed with the City;

d.

obtain a satisfactory inspection from the Chief Building Official
following patio installation, and prior to commencing operation;

e.

keep their patio clean and in good repair at all times with ongoing
and proactive maintenance;

f.

return the public lands on which thier patio is placed to its original
condition after the season. All patio objects including, but not limited
to, platforms, fencing, roadside barriers, and furniture, must be
removed from public lands at the end of the season and stored
elsewhere;

g.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in a manner that is
contiguous to the business’ frontage; and

h.

clean and maintain the public land under and directly adjacent to
their patio, including, without limitation, the sidewalk, roadway, and
gutter that may be inaccessible to City equipment due to the patios’s
location.

38.

Notwithstanding subsection 37(a) of this by-law, the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law does not apply to a patio, so long as the
requirements of this by-law are met, including that a patio agreement has
been executed with the City.

39.

Where, at any time, there is a change in, or relating to, any of the
information or documents required to be filed with an application under
this by-law, every Operator must report the change in writing to the
Director no later than fifteen (15) days following the change. Examples of
information that may change include:
a.

contact information;

b.

patio layout or configuration;

c.

fire safety measures; or

d.

insurance.

General Prohibitions
40.

41.

No Operator or Owner may construct, erect, or operate, or permit the
construction, erection, or operation of a patio:
a.

without a valid patio permit issued under this by-law;

b.

without a patio agreement executed with the City;

c.

while their patio permit is under suspension or revoked;

d.

except in accordance with the regulations of this by-law, including
Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements; and

e.

except in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable
patio permit and patio agreement, as the case may be.

No Operator may:

Page 64 of 114

PAGE 10

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

a.

transfer or assign a patio permit, without the express consent of the
Director;

b.

alter a patio’s design or layout contrary to the conditions of the patio
permit or patio agreement; or

c.

obtain a patio permit by providing false or incorrect information.
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice

Inspections
42.

The Director or an officer may at any reasonable time enter upon and
inspect the land of any person to ensure that the provisions of this by-law
are complied with.

43.

For the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this by-law, an
officer may:

44.

a.

require the production for inspection of documents or things relevant
to the inspection;

b.

inspect and remove documents or things relevant to the inspection
for the purpose of making copies or extracts;

c.

require information from any person concerning a matter related to
the inspection; and

d.

alone, or in conjunction with a person possessing special or expert
knowledge, make examinations or take tests, samples or
photographs necessary for the purpose of inspection.

The Director or an officer will provide a receipt for any document or thing
removed under subsection 43(b) and the document or thing will be
promptly returned after the copies or extracts are made.

Obstruction
45.

No person shall prevent, hinder, or obstruct, or attempt to prevent, hinder
or obstruct anyone who is lawfully exercising a power or performing a duty
under this by-law.

46.

Any person who has been alleged to have contravened any of the
provisions of this by-law must identify themselves to the Director or officer
upon request. Failure to do so will result in the person being deemed to
have obstructed or hindered the Director or officer in the execution of their
duties.

Orders
47.

An officer may make an order requiring the person who contravened this
by-law, or who caused or permitted the contravention, or the owner or
occupier of the land on which the contravention occurred, to discontinue
the contravening activity or to do work to correct the contravention.

48.

An order made pursuant to section 47 must:
a.

include the reasonable particulars of the contravention adequate to
identify the contravention and the location of the land on which the
contravention occurred;

b.

include the date by which there must be compliance with the order
and/or the work to be done and the date by which the work must be
done;
Page 65 of 114

PAGE 11
c.

49.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

direct that if the thing or matter that is required to be done is not
completed by the time set out in subsection 48(b), the matter or
thing will be done by the City at the person’s expense and the City
may recover the costs of doing the matter or thing from the person
directed or required to do it by action or by adding the costs to the
tax roll and collecting them in the same manner as property taxes.

Every person must comply with an order made pursuant to section 47.

Notice
50.

51.

Any notice or order issued pursuant to this by-law may be given in writing
in any of the following ways and is effective:
a.

on the date on which a copy is delivered to the person to whom it is
addressed;

b.

on the fifth day after a copy is sent by mail to the person’s last
known address;

c.

upon the sending of a copy by e-mail transmission to the person’s
last know email address; or

d.

posting on the premises, on the date of posting.

For the purpose of section 50, a person’s last known address and last
known email address are deemed to include information on the last revised
assessment roll and on an application submitted pursuant to this by-law.
Part IX. Offence and Penalty

52.

Every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law, or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, is guilty of an offence
and liable to a fine of:
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
53.

Where a corporation contravenes any provision of this by-law or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, and every director or
officer of a corporation who commits, concurs, assents to, or acquiesces to
such contravention, is guilty of an offence and is liable to a fine of
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties, as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
54.

In addition to any penalty otherwise provided for in this by-law, every
person convicted of an offence under this by-law is liable to a fine of not
more than $10,000 for each day during which the offence continues.

55.

Upon conviction any penalty imposed under this by-law may be collected
under the authority of the Provincial Offences Act.

56.

If a person is convicted of an offence for contravening a provision of this
by-law or an order made under this by-law, the court in which the
Page 66 of 114

PAGE 12

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

conviction has been entered, and any court of competent jurisdiction
thereafter, may order the person to correct the contravention in such
manner and within such period as the court considers appropriate.
Part X. Effective Date
57.

This by-law comes into full force and effect on May 1, 2026 at which time
all by-laws, policies or resolutions that are inconsistent with the provisions
of this by-law are hereby repealed or rescinded insofar as it is necessary to
give effect to the provisions of this by-law.
FINALLY PASSED AND ENACTED this 27 day of April, 2026.

Mayor Ian C. Boddy

Briana M. Bloomfield, City Clerk

Page 67 of 114

Schedule ‘A’ to By-law No. 2026-XXX
Patio Permit By-law
Part I. Design Requirements
Layout
1.

A Frontage Patio, Curbside Patio, and a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this
by-law, are permitted on public lands.

2.

A Curb Lane Patio is permitted within a maximum of two (2) on-street
parking spaces or a curb lane and is only permitted on roadways with:
a.

A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.

b.

No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).

c.

On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

3.

The width of the public lands between the building’s face and the edge of
the curb must be a minimum of 3 metres, before a Frontage Patio or a
Curbside Patio will be considered.

4.

A Curbside Patio will only be permitted where adjacent to on-street
parking.

5.

A Curbside Patio shall be setback 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb,
unless adjacent to a Curb Lane Patio.

6.

An Operator shall design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient Accessible Route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width as follows:
a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street East:
1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres

7.

The Accessible Route required by Section 6 of Schedule A of this by-law
shall be maintained in a straight line within a street block and be located at
least 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb.

8.

Patio layouts that propose a pedestrian clearway into a parking or curb
lane are prohibited.

9.

A Frontage Patio and Curbside Patio are not permitted to encroach upon
the frontage of neighbouring properties without explicit consent.

10.

Permission to utilize on-street parking spaces in front of neighbouring
properties is not required for a Curb Lane Patio, as long as the
requirements of this by-law are met.
Page 68 of 114

PAGE 2
11.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

City street furniture including, but not limited to, benches, trees, bollards,
or poles, must be kept free and clear from all encumbrances and access
must be maintained to hanging planters and other horticultural
installations adjacent to the patio area.

Platforms
12.

A Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this by-law, requires the installation of a
platform to bring the patio surface at grade with the sidewalk.

13.

All platforms shall:
a.

Be firm, flat, stable, and have a non-slip, level surface with a
difference in elevation of no more than six (6) millimetres.

b.

Be constructed of composite, metal, or wood decking material.

c.

Have spaces between decking no more than one (1) centimetre in
width, so as to not allow canes, walkers, wheels or other mobility
assistance devices from becoming lodged or stuck between them.

d.

Have entrances from the sidewalk that are a minimum of 1.2 metres
in width.

e.

Have fencing installed along the perimeter, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law, where
there is a change in elevation between the adjacent surface.

f.

Not obstruct stormwater flows or block stormwater drains. The
Operator shall be responsible for clearance of any debris and overall
maintenance to ensure free flow.

g.

Not be affixed to the sidewalk, road, or curb edge with screws, bolts,
adhesives, or any other materials.

Roadside Barriers
14.

A Curb Lane Patio requires the installation of roadside barriers to mitigate
the risk of an errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons
seated at tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.

15.

Roadside barriers are required to be provided and installed in the City road
allowance at the expense of the Operator.

16.

Roadside barrier installation and removal are required to be completed by
a qualified contractor trained in the Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.

17.

Roadside barriers shall:
a.

Be placed between 25 and 45 degrees upstream of the limits of a
Curb Lane Patio to protect from lateral impact.

b.

Be installed entirely within the limits of on-street parking spaces and
shall not encroach into any driving lane.

c.

Be installed according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

d.

Be a minimum of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety
Hardware) tested, in accordance with Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.
TL-2 and TL-3 MASH tested barriers may also be accepted.

e.

Be equipped with an appropriate amount of retroreflective material
to provide adequate daytime and night-time visibility.

Page 69 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Fencing
18.

Where possible, the requirement for fencing shall be minimized to reduce
visual clutter.

19.

A Frontage Patio and/or a Curbside Patio consisting of less than 15 tables
are not required to have fencing however, the perimeter of the patio area
is required to be delineated with tactile tape, as defined by this by-law, for
the benefit of the visually impaired.

20.

The Operator shall comply with all requirements of the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario as it relates to fencing of a licensed patio area.

21.

A Curb Lane Patio is required to have fencing, regardless of whether the
patio is licensed to serve alcohol or not.

22.

Where fencing is required, the following requirements shall be met:
a.

Fencing must have a minimum height of 0.9 metres and a maximum
height of 1.2 metres from the surface of the patio.

b.

Patios with fencing are required to have an open, unobstructed
entrance from the sidewalk that is a minimum of 1.2 metres wide.
The patio entrance shall align with the entrance of the applicable
business, where possible. No appurtenances of the patio including,
but not limited to, furniture, host stands, menu boards, or umbrellas,
are permitted to impede the entrance such that the clear width is
less than 1.2 metres.

c.

Fencing is not permitted to encroach within any portion of any
Accessible Route, as defined by this by-law. Fencing adjacent to the
Accessible Route is required to have a solid, cane-detectable base,
spaced no more than 0.3 metres apart and shall have a colour
contrast to the sidewalk to make it easily identifiable to pedestrians.

d.

Fencing shall be constructed of aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or
other solid material and shall consist of a dark or neutral colour.

e.

The use of chain-link, plastic, or vinyl fencing is prohibited.

f.

Fencing shall be open and transparent to maintain visibility from the
street.

g.

Fencing shall be free of jagged edges and other safety threats
brought on by poor design or construction.

h.

Fencing must be removable, free-standing, and self-supporting with
appropriate weights. Fencing required for a Curb Lane Patio is
permitted to be secured to a platform required by Section 12 to 13 of
Schedule A of this by-law. Any stability measures must not damage
public property, must not be designed to penetrate the surface of the
sidewalk or street and must be security without endangering any
underground utilities.

i.

Fencing is not permitted to obstruct vehicular or pedestrian
sightlines, fire routes, or fire hydrants, and is not permitted to
obstruct or be attached to any City street furniture including, but not
limited to, trees, benches, or light posts.

Sightlines
23.

Street furniture or a patio, including any appurtenances thereto, shall not
obstruct vehicular or pedestrian sightlines, visibility, or movements.
Page 70 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

24.

No portion of street furniture or a patio shall obstruct the five metre by
five metre sightline triangle at City street intersections or a three metre by
three metre sightline triangle at private vehicular driveway entrances.

25.

A Curbside Patio and/or a Curb Lane Patio are not permitted within five (5)
metres of an intersection.

Furniture
26.

All patio furniture, including fencing, shall be made of durable, weather
resistant materials. Composite, metal, painted or stained wood, or other
durable material to the satisfaction of the Director, is required.

27.

Plastic, vinyl, and pressure treated wood furniture is prohibited.

28.

Patio furniture, including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, host stands,
and umbrellas are not permitted to encroach into any portion of an
Accessible Route or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

Sources of Shade
29.

The use of retractable awnings installed on the first storey of buildings is
permitted to provide shade to Frontage Patios and Curbside Patios.

30.

Awnings shall:
a.

Be installed to have a minimum height of 2.4 metres above the
walking surface.

b.

Not conflict with trees or other City street furniture within the
boulevard.

c.

Be flame-retardant in accordance with the requirements of the
Ontario Fire Code, where a fabric awning is proposed.

31.

The installation of an awning requires a Building Permit from the City’s
Chief Building Official in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario
Building Code.

32.

Umbrellas and tents are permitted appurtenant to a patio as a source of
shade.

33.

Tents must be sized 10 square metres or less. If more than one tent is
installed, they shall be 3 metres apart from each other, including from
neighbouring establishments tents. Tents must not be closed on more than
two sides. Abutting a building constitutes a closed side.

34.

Umbrellas and tents must:
a.

Stand at least 2.1 metres above the walking surface.

b.

Be flame-retardant and approved by the City’s Fire Prevention
Officer.

c.

Not encroach into any portion of an Accessible Route or obstruct a
building or patio entrance.

d.

Be properly weighed down to prevent being blown over by wind. Any
stability measures must not damage public property, must not be
designed to penetrate the surface of the sidewalk or street, and must
be secured without endangering any underground utilities.

e.

Be removed during inclement weather or high winds so as not to
create a safety hazard.

f.

Not obstruct sightlines for pedestrians, cyclists, or motorists.
Page 71 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

35.

Posts and beams and/or a gazebo, pergola, trellis roof, or other similar
type of roof construction may be permitted as part of a proposed patio,
where indicated as part of a patio application pursuant to Part V of this bylaw, and subject to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code.

36.

Except for pre-manufactured tents described above, tarps or similar
roofing material are prohibited.

Fire Safety
37.

A minimum 1.8 metres clearance from fire department connections and
fire hydrants must be maintained on a patio.

38.

Fire hydrants and fire department connections must always be visible from
the street and accessible by Fire Services.

39.

If a patio is longer than 15 metres, emergency access points through the
patio may be required by the City Fire Prevention Office. Fire routes must
not be obscured by a patio.

Heaters
40.

All Patio flames and/or heaters, per the Ontario Fire Code, must meet the
requirements of Technical Standards and Safety Authority, be assembled
in accordance with the device’s manufacturer’s specifications and
installation in accordance with the same, which encompasses locations and
distances to combustibles.

41.

If use of propane and other flammable gases in cylinders on the Patio is
exercised, the Operator shall:

42.

a.

Not store any cylinders indoors.

b.

Store cylinders in lockable, non-combustible cabinets or cages that
are designed for such storage.

c.

Not store cylinders on sidewalk or any public thoroughfare.

d.

Store cylinders at least 0.9 metres from any building opening and
3.05 metres from any building’s mechanical air intake; and,

e.

Store propane cylinders 0.9 metres from other compressed gases.

No open flames are permitted where a fabric structure including, but not
limited to, an awning, tent, or umbrella, in installed appurtenant to a patio.

Waste Storage
43.

Operators shall provide a minimum of one (1) garbage receptacle for
patrons, the size and location of which shall be indicated on the Site Plan
required as part of a patio permit application, pursuant to Part V of this bylaw.

44.

Waste storage, collection, and the use of garbage bag tags shall be in
accordance with the City’s Waste Management By-law.

Signage
45.

Menu and sandwich board signage is permitted in accordance with the
City’s Sign By-law.

46.

Signage is not permitted to encroach into any part of an Accessible Route
or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

47.

Signage is not permitted to be displayed on any patio fencing or furniture.
Page 72 of 114

PAGE 6
48.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Third-party advertisements within or on any part of the patio, including
umbrellas, are prohibited.

Plant Materials
49.

Plant materials appurtenant to a patio must be healthy, living, and
maintained throughout the season.

50.

Planter boxes are permitted to be used as fencing, where the requirements
of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law are met.

51.

Plant materials may be affixed to fencing, provided they do not protrude
more than 100 millimetres horizontally from the cane-detectable railing
and do not obstruct any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio
entrance, or driving lane.

52.

Ground planters may be used within the patio for decoration but shall not
exceed 0.5 metres in width and 1.0 metre in height. Planters with plant
material shall not exceed 1.2 metres in height.

53.

Hanging planters are permitted provide plant material does not extend
more than 0.5 metres from the hanging planter box and does not encroach
into any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio entrance, or
driving lane.

Lighting
54.

Lighting is permitted within a patio, in accordance with the following
requirements:
a.

Lighting features are required to be temporary and comply with all
applicable safety standards and code.

b.

Lights may not exceed 3 metres in height.

c.

Lighting must be restricted to low voltage (12V system). 120VAC is
not permitted.

d.

Lights and power cables are not permitted to cross any portion of an
Accessible Route, building or patio entrance.

e.

Lighting shall be downward facing, dark sky compliant, and shall not
deflect onto neighbouring properties or the City street.

f.

Lights shall not attach City street furniture including, but not limited
to, utility poles, trees, and benches.

g.

Permission must be granted to the Operator for use of a power
source, if the Operator does not own it.

Street Furniture
55.

The placement of Street Furniture, as defined by this by-law, on public
lands, shall comply with the Operation requirements of Part VII of this bylaw and the design requirements set out in Schedule “A” of this by-law.

Page 73 of 114

CITY OF OWEN SOUND
PART I – PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT

Item

By-law No. 2026-XXX:
Patio Permit By-law
COLUMN 1
Short Form Wording

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

1

Construct, erect, operate patio between Nov 1 – Apr 30

s. 36

$500

2

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio between Nov 1-Apr 30

s. 36

$500

3

Operator - Fail to carry required insurance

s. 37.b.

$1,000

4

Operator - Fail to construct, erect, operate patio in accordance with patio
agreement

s. 37.c.

$500

5

Operator - Fail to obtain satisfactory inspection from CBO before
operating patio

s. 37.d.

$400

6

Operator - Fail to keep patio clean and in good repair

s. 37.e.

$500

7

Operator - Fail to return public land to original condition after season

s. 37.f.

$500

8

Operator – Fail to construct, erect, operate patio contiguous to frontage
of Operator’s business

s. 37.g.

$400

Page 74 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

9

Operator - Fail to clean and maintain public land under or adjacent to
patio

s. 37.i.

$500

10

Operator - Fail to report change in information

s. 39

$400

11

Construct, erect, operate patio without a valid patio permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

12

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without valid patio
permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

13

Construct, erect, operate patio without an executed patio agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

14

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without executed patio
agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

15

Construct, erect, operate patio while patio permit suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

16

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio while patio permit
suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

17

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of design requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

Page 75 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

18

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of design
requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

19

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of conditions in permit or
agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

20

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of conditions
in permit or agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

21

Operator – Transfer or assign patio permit without consent

s. 41.a.

$400

22

Operator – Alter patio design/layout contrary to conditions

s. 41.b.

$1,000

23

Operator – Obtain patio permit using false or incorrect information

s. 41.c.

$500

24

Prevent/hinder/obstruct lawful exercise of power under by-law

s. 45

$500

25

Fail to identify self upon request

s. 46

$500

26

Fail to comply with an order

s. 49

$500

NOTE: the general penalty provision for the offences listed above is section 52 of the By-law, a certified copy of which
has been filed.

Page 76 of 114

SCHEDULE C
ROADSIDE BARRIER OPTIONS
Option

Cost Per Unit*

Single Unit Size
(LxWxH)

Annual Rent

A

TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water
Filled)

$50 per unit per
month

1.8 m x 0.45 m x 0.8 m

$2,400

B

TL-1 Urban Barrier

$20 per meter per
month

2.7 m x 0.15 m x 1.15 m

$2,160

C

TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

$24 per meter per
month

1.6 m x 0.8 m x 0.8 m

$2,592

* Source: Municipality of Meaford Staff Report DEV2025-029
Estimates assume a patio located within one (1) parking stall, sized 6 m in length and 3 m in width, operating for
six (6) months total (May 1 to October 31).
Prices do not include delivery or other logistical costs.

Report: CS-26-031

Page 77 of 114
1

Option A – TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water Filled)

Report: CS-26-031

Page 78 of 114
2

Option B – TL-1 Urban Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 79 of 114
3

Option C – TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 80 of 114
4

City Hall Illumination/Lighting Request Form
For full policy details outlining City Hall Illumination requests please see the Flag Flying Proclamations and Public
Awareness Campaigns policy here (City Hall Illumination starts on page 7).
Name of Requesting Organization *
Ontario Medical Association

Contact Information
Name *

Email Address *

Bianca Turchiaro

bianca.turchiaro@oma.org

Home/Cell Phone Number *

Work Phone Number
6479832424

City Hall Lighting Date(s)
Illumination requests will be granted for a maximum duration of seven (7) days unless there are no conflicting
requests in which case the duration may extend to a maximum duration of fourteen (14) days, at the discretion of
the City Manager.
Requests will be considered on a first come, first served basis, based on the date the request is received by the
City Manager’s office; requests should be made at least two (2) weeks in advance of the desired lighting date.
Please note that the changing of City Hall lights will take place on regular business days.
Starting Date of Illumination: *
5/1/2026

End Date of Illumination: *


5/1/2026



Requested Light Colours
At this time, the only colour options available are: Green, Blue, Red, White, and Pink/Purple.
No other colours are available at this time.
Please select the colour of your illumination request: *
Green
Blue
Red
White
Pink/Purple

Page 81 of 114

Details/Purpose of the illumination event: *
Every year, the Ontario Medical Association asks Ontarians to celebrate Doctors' Day and thank the amazing
doctors who work tirelessly to keep us healthy and safe. From doctors in the emergency room to specialists in
a clinic, Ontario's physicians care for all of us, even during health system issues and systemic barriers to care.
First recognized by the provincial government in 2011, the date was chosen to mark the birthday of Canada's
first female physician, Dr. Emily Stowe. In recent years, various landmarks, city halls, and other municipal
centers have lit up blue to celebrate our physicians, and we hope this year will be the biggest yet.

Description of your organization including a brief history and any other relevant information: *
The Ontario Medical Association is a not-for-profit organization that represents Ontario's 50,000+ physicians,
medical students, and retired physicians. The OMA advocates for and supports doctors while strengthening
their leadership role in patient care. We support doctors in their vision to be a trusted voice in transforming
Ontario's healthcare system. The OMA has members across the province, from Niagara Falls to Sioux
Lookout. The OMA will be promoting this event on our website and social media pages. For Doctors’ Day
2026, the sign’s likeness may appear in communications on both our website and our social media pages,
should a physician in Owen Sound send us a photo of the illumination of City Hall.

Would you like to submit your City Hall illumination request to happen annually? *
Yes, please repeat on an annual basis
No, this one time only
Please note that it is up to the person/group submitting the request to contact the City if the annual date changes
or discontinues for any reason.
By submitting this form, you affirm that the facts set forth in it are true and complete. All City Hall illumination
requests must adhere to the Flag Flying, Proclamations and Public Awareness Campaigns Policy.
The personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, 227 and City
Policy CMA34. The information is used for the City Hall lighting process including, but not limited to, evaluating
requests for illumination events and contacting the requestor.
City Manager Approval - signature & date

Date on Council Consent Agenda

Page 82 of 114

Correspondence Items Presented for Information
April 27, 2026
1)

Correspondence from AMCTO Re: Advocacy Update – Follow-Up to Budget
Update on Proposed MFIPPA Changes.

2)

Correspondence from the Deputy Clerk, City of Owen Sound Re: Regional
Governance Changes.

3)

Correspondence from the Intermediate Planner, Grey County Re: Age-Friendly
Action Plan Progress Report.

4)

Correspondence from the Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization
Branch, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Re: Proposed
Environmental Assessment Act Amendments to Improve the Comprehensive
Environmental Assessment Process.

5)

Correspondence from the Registrar, Ontario Energy Board Re: 2026 Generic
Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement Extension of
Intervention Deadline.

6)

Correspondence from the Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce
Peninsula Source Protection Committee Re: Possible Implications to the Clean
Water Act.

7)

Correspondence from the Chair, Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus Re:
Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform.

Page 83 of 114

Item 1

About AMCTO | Professional Growth | Advocacy & Policy | Network & Community

April 10, 2026
Advocacy Update: Follow-Up to Budget Update on Proposed
MFIPPA Changes
As a follow-up to our previous advocacy update outlining proposed changes
to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1990 (MFIPPA) made through the budget bill, we want to highlight our
concerns regarding the scope and depth of proposed changes on the
privacy side. These changes align the Act with similar changes made
previously to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1989 (FIPPA), but do not consider municipal staff capacity or financial
constraints.
Privacy-related changes include:
•

Requiring that the head of an institution ensure that a written
assessment is prepared and contains certain information respecting
any Personal Information (PI) that is to be collected. This includes
but is not limited to:

Page 84 of 114

o

The purpose, intended use, and explanation for collection

o

Who will have access to the PI

o

Limitations or restrictions on collection, use or disclosure

o

Safeguard practices to protect the PI

o

Steps taken to prevent the likelihood of theft, loss,
unauthorized use, or disclosure of the PI

•

Requiring that risks are mitigated by ensuring the above steps are
implemented before collecting PI

•

Requiring that institutions provide access to the written assessment
to the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC)

•

Reporting any breach of privacy safeguards to the IPC and notifying
affected individuals

•

Outlining factors to determine the real risk of significant harm

•

Removing the definition of personal information bank

•

Imposing a right of access to PI

•

Authorizing the IPC to review information practices of an institution
where the IPC has received a complaint, with authorization to resolve
the matter through mediation, conciliation, and other informal
means.

•

Requiring an institution to assist the IPC in conducting a review

While we acknowledge that many of these proposals are important best
practices moving forward, we would like to offer the following
recommendations to the Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery
for consideration:
•

Over 80% of Ontario municipalities have populations under 50,000.
In many municipalities, the administrative function is performed by a
single employee, often the municipal clerk, who manages FOI and
privacy programs along with 80 other statutory responsibilities,

Page 85 of 114

which can include council governance, bylaw enforcement, and
elections.
•

As 2026 is a municipal and school board election year, wherein
municipal budget processes are disrupted with councils inaugurated
in November, requests for resources to support new requirements
may not be contemplated until 2027. This timing makes it extremely
challenging to transition to new rules that are proposed to be in
effect by January 1, 2027.

•

The January 1 deadline for privacy impact assessments is too short a
timeframe for municipalities to address new requirements and seek
new resources, including staff and funding support to action the new
requirements.

•

The scope of the privacy impact assessments is exceptionally broad.
It is not clear whether these would apply to information collected
going forward or would also retroactively apply, which would be an
insurmountable task for already overburdened municipal staff.
o

If retroactively applied, this will likely result in substantial costs
for institutions and take years for many municipalities to come
into compliance, given the above-noted limitations.

Given the varying levels of capacity and maturity across MFIPPA
institutions, we want to understand what resources the Ministry and the
Information and Privacy Commissioner are developing to support
municipalities in this transition and when they will be made available.
In the meantime, we have prepared the following redline version of the
Act, which shows the amendments Bill 97 proposes. We hope this makes it
easier for members to see the exact changes that are being proposed.
REVIEW REDLINE VERSION OF THE ACT
We also invite you to send us your templates, policies, procedures, and
other relevant resources related to:
•

Privacy impact assessments

Page 86 of 114

•

Information management best practices

•

Risk and breach management

•

Job advertisement requirements for staffing

•

Budget/business cases for more resources

Over the coming weeks, we will be reviewing materials to determine the
best next steps for how to support members, municipal clerks, and their
staff with implementing the proposed new requirements.
Please provide any resources you'd like to share with our policy and
advocacy team by Monday, April 20.
Our team will be continuing to evaluate the proposals to determine the full
impacts on municipal administration and service delivery, and welcomes
feedback from members with expertise in FOI and privacy.
We will also be applying to speak at Standing Committee where your
feedback will help inform our submission. Please provide your feedback as
soon as possible.
We will be seeking clarity with the Ministry over the coming days and will
provide updates as appropriate.

Page 87 of 114

Item 2
Staci Landry, Deputy Clerk
City of Owen Sound
808 2nd Avenue East
Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4

Phone: 519-376-4440 ext. 1235
Facsimile: 519-371-0511
Email: slandry@owensound.ca
Website: www.owensound.ca

April 16, 2026
Via Email
Paul Vickers, MPP
Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound
paul.vickers@pc.ola.org
Dear Mr. Vickers:
Re:

Regional Governance Changes

City Council, at its meeting held on April 13, 2026, considered the above-noted
"THAT in consideration of items 1.c and 2.b on the
correspondence package (Item 11.l) listed on the April
13, 2026 Consent Agenda respecting Regional Governance
Changes, City Council directs staff to send a letter to Paul
Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound expressing
concerns with the proposed changes to the Regional
Governance Act."
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Staci Landry
Deputy Clerk

Page 88 of 114

Item 3

Committee Report
To:

Warden Matrosovs and Members of Grey County Council

Committee Date:

March 26, 2026

Subject / Report No:

PDR-CW-11-26

Title:

Progress Report – Age-Friendly Action Plan

Prepared by:

Cassondra Dillman, Intermediate Planner

Reviewed by:

Scott Taylor, Director of Planning

Lower Tier(s) Affected:

All member municipalities in Grey County

Recommendation
1. That report PDR-CW-11-26 regarding the County’s Age-Friendly Action Plan
progress be received for information; and
2. That staff be authorized to make minor amendments to the County’s AgeFriendly Action Plan, without impacting the intent of the Plan, to enable
plan implementation; and
3. That staff be directed to share the Progress Report with all member
municipalities for information.

Executive Summary
Grey County is advancing its Age-Friendly Community vision to ensure residents of all
ages can live, work, and participate fully in safe and accessible environments. With the
County population aging rapidly, projected to have more than one-third of residents over
65 by 2035, it is important to prioritize planning for inclusive and Age-Friendly housing,
transportation, and community services.
Supported by a 2021 provincial grant, Grey County developed its Age-Friendly
Community Strategy and Action Plan, endorsed in 2022. The Plan outlines over 100
recommended actions based on the World Health Organization’s eight Age-Friendly
community dimensions and relies on collaboration across County departments,
municipalities, and over 20 community partners.
The progress report, linked in the attachment section below, identifies that half of the
action items have been completed, are underway, or are embedded in ongoing County

PDR-CW-11-26

1

March 26, 2026
Page 89 of 114

operations, and items from all eight dimensions have been initiated. A four-page
Progress Snapshot is also linked below to provide a high-level overview.
Staff are recommending minor updates to some action items to streamline actions,
update leads, and better align responsibilities, strengthening the County’s ability to
support residents of all ages and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly
Grey County.

Background and Discussion
An Age-Friendly Community is designed so everyone, including children, youth, adults,
and older residents, can live, work, and play in safe, accessible, and welcoming spaces.
Creating an Age-Friendly community begins by examining all parts of community life,
including land development, transportation, parks, social services through an AgeFriendly lens. Committing to seeing and addressing projects, issues, and policies
through this Age-Friendly lens is how we create Age-Friendly communities.
As Grey County grows and ages, the case for Age-Friendly planning only strengthens.
By 2035, more than 1 in 3 Grey residents will be over 65. By planning for Age-Friendly
housing, transportation, and community services, the County can support older adults to
maintain independence and thrive in their communities, as well as their caregivers and
their families. By focusing on the needs of the most vulnerable, from seniors to young
children, our communities become places where everyone can thrive no matter their
age, ability, or background.

Developing the County’s Age-Friendly Initiative
In 2021, Grey County successfully obtained a $60,000 Inclusive Community Grant, from
the Government of Ontario, to develop an Age-Friendly Community Strategy and Action
Plan. The project was highly collaborative with contributions from a stakeholder
committee, community organizations, member municipalities, County staff and over 700
residents. The completed Action Plan was endorsed by County Council in March 2022
and shared with all member municipalities.
Through this process, two important items emerged: a community vision focused on all
ages and an understanding of the Age-Friendly community building that is already
occurring throughout the County. As a result, the Action Plan emphasizes collaboration,
outlining over 100 recommended actions to address and advance key Age-Friendly
priorities regardless of age.

PDR-CW-11-26

2

March 26, 2026
Page 90 of 114

Action Plan Implementation
Grey County’s Age-Friendly Strategy and Action Plan are built around the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) eight community dimensions, ranging from physical infrastructure
(outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, housing) to soft infrastructure (respect
and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, community and information,
community support and health services, and social participation).
Since 2022, County staff have been working on plan implementation. While
accountability for the Plan lies with Grey County’s Planning department, successful
implementation requires efforts from all County departments and a wide range of
community partners. The Grey County Age-Friendly Communities Committee supports
this work and serves as a cross-sector network sharing resources and fostering
collaboration among those involved in Age-Friendly initiatives across the County.
The Action Plan also recommends regular progress reviews to help identify successes,
address gaps, and guide resources effectively. As Grey County is a two-tier
government, the Action Plan naturally connects and interacts with many existing
municipal services and community initiatives. The Plan provides a framework for AgeFriendly community planning. Building an Age-Friendly community is an iterative
planning process: revisions signal growth and strengthen the community’s Age-Friendly
vision. The detailed Progress Report and Progress Snapshot are linked in the
attachments section below.

What We’ve Learned
The following insights have emerged during the implementation and review of the AgeFriendly Action Plan:
Theme

Summary

Organizational AgeFriendly lens

Many County staff and departments apply an AgeFriendly lens in their daily work, making it part of our
organizational culture.

Broad range of AgeFriendly initiatives
underway

There are many projects and day-to-day activities
across County departments that aid Age-Friendly
community planning goals, some of which are above
and beyond those identified in the Action Plan.

Growing community
engagement and
participation

Community interest in Age-Friendly initiatives
continues to grow.

PDR-CW-11-26

3

March 26, 2026
Page 91 of 114

Local Age-Friendly
leadership

Age-Friendly fairs were hosted by both Grey
Highlands and Blue Mountains this past year. Grey
County was recognized by the province as an AgeFriendly Community in 2026, alongside the Town of
Hanover who has been a provincial leader in AgeFriendly planning since 2017.

The importance of
partnerships

Partnerships are essential for addressing complex
societal issues, such as mental health, addictions,
health care and homelessness. These issues are
beyond the capacity of one organization alone.

The COVID-19
pandemic

The pandemic changed how residents participate,
communicate, and engage with their communities,
while exposing the digital divide, disrupted volunteer
networks, and increased risk of social isolation
among older adults.

Staffing Resources

The absence of a dedicated Age-Friendly
Community Coordinator has added some complexity
to managing the plan and coordinating partners.

Evaluation

Although each action item included performance
indicators and a project lead, much of the data was
not easily available, the indicators did not always
reflect meaningful outcomes, and some identified
leads are no longer suitable.

These insights highlight that Grey County cannot achieve this vision alone. Partnerships
with municipalities, volunteer groups, and not-for-profits are essential to advancing AgeFriendly community planning goals. Grey County’s continued leadership, collaboration,
and commitment to learning will ensure a strong foundation for ongoing progress.

Next Steps
Grey County has made meaningful steps forward in implementing the Age-Friendly
Action Plan and important work remains ahead. The review identified opportunities to
strengthen community partnerships, improve outcome tracking, and identified initiatives
that require additional resources or collaboration.
Moving forward, staff will continue to implement and advance the Action Plan and
support the Age-Friendly Communities Committee. The progress review has also
identified some action items that would benefit from reassessment. Several action items
were identified for consolidation, division, retirement or shifted to a more appropriate
lead. Through this report staff are seeking Council’s support for making minor tweaks to
the Action Plan, without changing the intent of the Plan. The changes would aid in the

PDR-CW-11-26

4

March 26, 2026
Page 92 of 114

implementation of the Plan to streamline actions, update leads, and to better align
responsibilities. For example:
-

-

Action Item 4.5 - regarding the creation of a Grey County Accessibility Group - is
no longer necessary due to continued success of the Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee. The review also identified four duplicate items in the original Plan.
In addition, staff separated nine action items within the report card into smaller,
more specific components to improve clarity and tracking.
The Action Plan assigns a lead and partner organization for each action;
however, many of these leads are no longer suitable because the corresponding
organizations or positions no longer exist.

After four years of working with the Plan, staff have identified these adjustments as
minor but valuable improvements. They will help strengthen implementation, enhance
tracking and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly Grey County.

Financial and Resource Implications
None.

Relevant Consultation
☒
Internal: All County departments were consulted, including Long Term Care,
Transportation Services, Human Resources, Clerks and Legislative Services,
Paramedic Services, Economic Development, Tourism and Culture, Climate Change
Initiatives, Provincial Offences, and Communications
☒
External: Municipal staff and community organizations, including Grey Bruce
Health Unit, Beaver Valley Outreach, Alzheimer Society Grey-Bruce, Grey Bruce Legal
Clinic, Grey Bruce Elder Prevention Network, Osteoporosis Canada, Breaking Down
Barriers, and Regional Geriatric Program of Southwestern Ontario

Appendices and Attachments
Age-Friendly Action Plan Progress Report 2026.pdf
Age-Friendly Progress Snapshot 2026.pdf

PDR-CW-11-26

5

March 26, 2026
Page 93 of 114

Item 4

Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks

Ministère de l’Environnement, de
la Protection de la nature et des Parcs

Environmental Assessment
Modernization Branch

Direction de la modernisation des processus
d'évaluation environnementale

135 St. Clair Avenue West
4th Floor
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

135, avenue St. Clair Ouest
4e étage
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

April 20, 2026
TO:

Stakeholder Distribution List

RE:

Proposed Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) amendments to improve the
comprehensive environmental assessment (EA) process

Today, Ontario introduced the Protecting Ontario’s Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026
(POWER Act) in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. If made, the changes would support a more
efficient comprehensive EA process and make it easier to navigate by removing certain steps
while maintaining strong environmental protections and other consultation opportunities.
The proposed legislation would, if passed, amend the Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) to
make three key changes to the comprehensive EA process:
• Remove the requirement to publish and consult on a Ministry Review
• Remove the opportunity for the public to request a hearing before the Ontario Land
Tribunal (Tribunal) while maintaining the Minister’s authority to refer an application or
matter related to an application to the Tribunal for a hearing and decision on their own
initiative
• Remove the requirement for Cabinet approval of the Minister’s decision, while providing
the Minister discretion to refer an application to Cabinet for a decision
In addition, we also proposed minor updates to improve clarity and flexibility in the EAA.
If the proposed EAA amendments are made, the regulation that sets out deadlines for certain
steps in the comprehensive EA process (Ontario Regulation 616/98 (Deadlines)) would be
adjusted to align with the changes.
The proposal has been posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) for public
comment. More information is available here. Input is being accepted until May 20, 2026.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at EAModernization.MECP@ontario.ca.
Any comments on the proposal can be submitted through the ERO posting via the link above, or
by email to us.

Page 94 of 114

We are committed to keeping you apprised about EA modernization and working with you to build
a strong EA program for Ontario. We value your perspectives on the EA program and look
forward to your further participation. More information on our other efforts to modernize the EA
program can also be found here.
Sincerely,

Annamaria Cross
Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization Branch
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks

Page 2 of 2

Page 95 of 114

Item 5

BY EMAIL

April 17, 2026

TO:

All Municipalities
All Natural Gas Utilities
Frequent Intervenors
Information Session Participants

Re:

2026 Generic Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement
Extension of Intervention Deadline
Ontario Energy Board File Number: EB-2026-0009

The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) wishes to thank all municipalities, gas utilities, and
other interested parties who attended the recent municipal franchise generic proceeding
information session on April 15, 2026. The high level of engagement and thoughtful
questions underscored the importance of this proceeding and the value of broad
participation.
As explained in the Notice of Hearing, municipalities, gas utilities, and other interested
parties who wish to actively participate in this proceeding must apply for intervenor
status and, where applicable, cost eligibility using the OEB’s online Intervention Form.
Following the information session, the OEB noted a common concern that some
municipalities may be unable to meet the pre-established deadline for requesting
intervenor status in this proceeding. In response to this concern, the OEB is extending
the deadline to apply for intervenor status to May 1, 2026.
The OEB also acknowledges comments from various municipalities regarding potential
challenges for active municipal participation in this proceeding due to the upcoming
municipal election cycle. The OEB intends to consider this in designing its procedural
schedule, which will be issued at a later date.
The commissioners assigned to this proceeding are: David Sword (presiding), Robert
Dodds, and James Sidlofsky.

2300 Yonge Street, 27th floor, P.O. Box 2319, Toronto, ON, M4P 1E4

T 416-481-1967

1-888-632-6273

2300, rue Yonge, 27e étage, C.P. 2319, Toronto (Ontario) M4P 1E4

F 416-440-7656

OEB.ca

Page 96 of 114

Ontario Energy Board

-2Should you have any questions regarding this proceeding, please contact Natalya
Plummer at natalya.plummer@oeb.ca.
Yours truly,

Ritchie
Murray

Digitally signed by Ritchie
Murray
Date: 2026.04.17
14:26:16 -04'00'

Ritchie Murray
Registrar

Page 97 of 114

Item 6

April 13, 2026
Hon. Todd J. McCarthy
Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Dear Minister McCarthy,
Upon review of the recent changes to Ontario Conservation Authorities and proposed further
changes that could impact the Clean Water Act and its Regulations, our Source Protection
Committee collaborated on the following response.
Over the last 25 years, protection of municipal drinking water sources in Ontario has improved
dramatically. However, as the landscape and the climate changes, we must remain vigilant and
continue with drinking water source protection measures to ensure that there continues to be safe
water available for public consumption. Recently, the Province announced changes to boundaries
for the regional consolidation of Ontario’s conservation authorities. This reconfiguration must
align with the fundamental basis of Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report
recommendation to maintain watershed-based drinking water source protection at the local level.
As a Source Protection Committee, we strongly advocate that Justice O’Connor’s
recommendations are respected to ensure that source protection planning and implementation
remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches.
The integrity of the drinking water source protection program is local, watershed-based
committees that include members from the agriculture, business/commerce/industry, municipal,
environment and health sectors. These members have a vested interest in the sources and drinking
water systems that supply their families, neighbours and constituents with a safe supply of drinking
water. Dilution of this oversight to the new regional conservation authority scale will not serve the
recommendations made by Justice O’Connor following the tragedy that happened in Walkerton in
our Source Protection Region. Our region and its residents are considerably more familiar and
unwilling to waver on the core principles of the program.
Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report recommended watershed-based drinking water
source protection planning at the local level by those most directly affected. To ensure that source
protection planning and implementation remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches,
and to minimize the need for time consuming administrative changes and conformity exercises,
the province should consider:
• Adopting the current scale of Source Protection Regions as the largest geographic extent for the
proposed regional Conservation Authorities. A single regional Source Protection Authority
spanning numerous municipalities risks weakening local accountability, distancing decisionmaking from watershed-specific realities, and diluting the local focus that is foundational to
effective watershed management.

Page 98 of 114

• Retaining the current geographic scale of Source Protection Areas. Ensuring that Assessment
Reports (ARs) and Source Protection Plans (SPPs) would continue to be reflective of local
drinking water threats, vulnerabilities, and policy approaches. While also helping ensure that
conformity exercises and consequential amendments to ARs and SPPs would be minimized.
Consolidation of ARs and SPPs to reflect changed Source Protection Area boundaries would be
time consuming and contribute little to the outcomes of the source protection program.
• Maintaining local representation on Source Protection Committees (SPCs) to ensure that
municipal, economic, public interest holders, and implementation bodies continue to have a voice
in identifying needed amendments to plans and overseeing progress towards achieving the
objectives of SPPs. Continued alignment of SPCs with Source Protection Region jurisdictions
would help ensure local representation and accountability.
The Source Protection Committee has deep concerns about possible implications to the Clean
Water Act as a result of the recent Conservation Authority Act changes. It is our intent to continue
to work with the province, local municipalities and local Source Protection Authorities to protect
our local sources of drinking water in the spirit of Justice O’Connor’s recommendations.
Sincerely,

Dick Hibma
Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula
Source Protection Committee
Cc via email: Kirsten Service, MECP
Source Protection Authorities
Municipal Clerks

2

Page 99 of 114

Item 7

Monday, April 20, 2026
Premier of Ontario
Hon. Doug Ford
Legislative Building, Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Sent via email: premier@ontario.ca
Re: Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform
At its regular meeting on April 10, 2026, the Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus adopted the following motion in
support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform:

11.c Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences:

The section addresses the procedural finalization of business licence approvals, noting that while fines are being considered to deter non-compliance, they are intended as a last resort after cooperative efforts with operators. A significant portion of the text details the safety requirements for roadside barriers, mandating TL-1 MASH tested concrete jersey barriers for curb lane patios to protect patrons from errant vehicles, with costs falling on the operator. The by-law also streamlines the renewal process for existing patios by reducing administrative burdens and fees, while delegating approval authority to senior management to ensure a balanced review from both Community Services and Public Works divisions.

Page 39 of 114

b.

No fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and/or curbside
patio renewals, where there are no changes proposed to the
street furniture or patio layout, and a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and the term of the agreement
has not expired; and

c.

$100 per parking stall per month, up to a maximum of two (2)
parking stalls for a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by the Patio
Permit By-law.

Highlights:











Patios in the municipal right-of-way in the River District are one
way the City encourages a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly
streetscape.
The City’s current Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
are a 2011 document and warrant review to ensure that universal
accessibility, public safety and the streetscape experience are
enhanced and not negatively impacted by the introduction of a
patio within the right-of-way.
Updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were
presented to the City’s Community Services Committee at its
meeting on March 18, 2026, through Staff Report CS-26-013.
City staff consulted with the River District Board of Management,
the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee, and River
District business owners on the updated guidelines.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit Bylaw.
The purpose of this report is to report on the feedback received
from various stakeholders that has been considered in the final bylaw and present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment:
Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development,
planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that
contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents
and tourists.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 2 of 15

Page 40 of 114

Previous Report/Authority:
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines (2011)
Staff Report CS-22-065 – Patio Funding Options
Staff Report CS-23-051 – River District Patios – Ontario Traffic Council
Guidelines for Patios within the Right of Way
Staff Report CS-26-013 – Draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines

Background:
Sidewalk patios are outdoor extensions to existing commercial
establishments that are located on City-owned property, such as the
sidewalk or municipal on-street parking spaces. Street furniture and sidewalk
patios are often located within the City’s River District and Harbour area.
At its meeting on September 15, 2021, Community Services Committee
subsequently adopted on September 27, 2021, through adoption of the
"THAT the Community Services Committee recommends that City
Council direct staff to:
1.

Bring forward a report to a future Community Services
Committee meeting respecting the potential of facilitating
sidewalk patios through the Community Improvement Plan;
and,

2.

Undertake a review of the Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio
Design Guidelines."

Over the last three months, Planning staff have been working together with
the City’s Development Team including Engineering Services, the Building
Division, Clerks staff, Fire Prevention, and the River District Coordinator to
Services Committee on May 18, 2022.
Updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines were presented to the
Community Services Committee at its meeting on March 18, 2026, through
Staff Report CS-26-013. The Community Services Committee adopted the
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 3 of 15

Page 41 of 114

adopted on April 13, 2026, through adoption of the meeting minutes:
"THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-013 respecting the
draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, the Community
Services Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to:
1.

Consult with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee and River District business owners with previous
patio approvals on the draft guidelines; and

2.

Bring forward a report including input received from
stakeholders and a draft sidewalk patio by-law for
consideration to the April 27, 2026, Regular Council
Meeting."

Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines at its meeting on
March 11, 2026 and the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee
on April 17, 2026. Staff requested feedback from all River District business
owners on the updated guidelines through the River District newsletter on
March 24, 2026.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit By-law attached
as Schedule ‘A’, with a purpose of:
a.

Encouraging the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants,
cafes, and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street
furniture and amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian
friendly built environment, particularly within the City’s River
District and Harbour Area; and

b.

Ensuring that universal accessibility, public safety, and the
streetscape experience are enhanced and not negatively
impacted by the introduction of a patio within the municipal
right-of-way.

As Council will recall, in Spring of 2022, the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC)
released Restaurant Patio Guidelines that were developed by experts in the
transportation industry and are the best practice for managing restaurant
patios within a road authority’s right-of-way. The proposed Patio Permit Bylaw implements the OTC Guidelines, consistent with the approach of other
municipalities across Ontario.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 4 of 15

Page 42 of 114

The purpose of this report is to outline the feedback received from various
stakeholders that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law and to
present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Analysis and Options:
This section summarizes the feedback received from various stakeholders
that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law:

By-law Format
City Planning staff consulted with the Clerks Division on updated draft Street
Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines on March 3, 2026. Based on the
feedback received, it was recommended that the updated guidelines be
transitioned to a by-law. This approach allows a mechanism for enforcement,
should a patio be placed illegally within the municipal right-of-way, and is
consistent with the approach of other municipalities across Ontario including
the City of Ottawa, the Municipality of Kincardine, and the Township of
Loyalist, which all have their own respective sidewalk patio by-laws.
The Patio Permit By-law is attached as Schedule ‘A’ to this report. In
adopting the Patio Permit By-law, it is necessary to repeal Section 2.18 of
By-law 1989-138, being a By-law to Regulate the Use of and Preservation of
Order on Streets, to remove provisions related to outdoor patios that are in
conflict with the new by-law.
Following adoption of the Patio Permit By-law, Planning staff will work with
Communications staff to create a more visual, user-friendly guide to the bylaw to assist staff and patio operators in the ongoing administration of the
program.

Fines for Non-Compliance
Staff are recommending the use of set fines for non-compliance. Wherever
possible, infractions that can be applied to both the patio operator and the
property owner will be applied to both. It is particularly important that the
patio operator be held accountable as they ultimately own, operate, and
manage the sidewalk patio.
Schedule ‘B’ outlines the proposed infractions and associated set fines. The
maximum set fine that is permitted is $1,000. The set fines in the
attachment do not include the administrative costs that are added onto the
fines (victim surcharge added by the Provincial Offences Court). The
proposed set fines align with similar offences in other regulatory by laws. In
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 5 of 15

Page 43 of 114

addition, the fines need to be high enough so that patio operators don't
consider a fine as the cost of doing business.
Should Council approve the proposed set fines, staff will apply to the Ministry
of the Attorney General for final approval. It is worth noting that tickets can
be issued each day that there is a contravention of the by-law, and this
would be communicated to the owner as part of the application process.
As with many other by-laws, circumstances in which staff would lay fines
would be rare and used as a last resort. Staff would first work cooperatively
with the patio operator to achieve compliance with the by-law.

Roadside Barriers
As described in Staff Report CS-26-013, the Patio Permit By-law implements
the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC) Restaurant Patio Guidelines released in
Spring of 2022 for patios located within the right-of-way, particularly as it
relates to the use of roadside barriers for Curb Lane Patios located within an
on-street parking space or a curb lane.
The Patio Permit By-law permits a Curb Lane Patio within a maximum of two
(2) on-street parking spaces or a curb lane only on roadways with:




A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.
No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).
On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

The City’s roadways of 2nd Avenue East, 3rd Avenue East, 8th Street East, and
9th Street East would meet these requirements.
Based on these road characteristics, the OTC Guidelines require the
installation of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware) tested
barriers to be installed within the road allowance to mitigate the risk of an
errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons seated at
tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.
Comments received from the City’s Director of Public Works and
Engineering, as it relates to roadside barriers are as follows:
The OTC specifies that a minimum of TL-1 rated barriers be employed
in this scenario, however some barriers require specific setbacks to
accommodate deflection from impacts, even at relatively low speeds
such as 50 km/h. This is a critical factor; barricades work to keep
vehicles on the road by absorbing the force of impact, typically at an
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 6 of 15

Page 44 of 114

oblique angle (i.e. a glancing blow). Some absorb it by being able to
withstand the impact, usually through sheer force of gravity
(weight/mass); an example of this is the concrete jersey barrier.
Others absorb the force by cradling the vehicle and deflecting it back
onto the road. This type of barrier is meant to stretch or push
backwards and angle the vehicle back into a straight trajectory. This
principle is most commonly seen in the post and steel cable or steel wbeam guiderails on highways. These barriers, due to their designed
deflection, require varying depths of setbacks to be able to function
properly. Anything or anyone caught within this deflection zone is in
extreme danger should the barrier be struck.
For this reason, the best and recommended choice in this case is the
concrete jersey barrier style, having the least horizontal displacement,
and therefore a minimal setback zone. Although the minimum clear
zone required behind a particular type of barrier varies from product to
product, in general, water or sand-filled jersey barriers would be next
best, as they have a relatively small required clear zone at 0.5 m.
However, these also require regular patrols to ensure they remain
adequately filled. For comparison, ‘Urban Barrier’ has the largest
displacement distance, at approximately 2 metres, even at 50 km/h.
An added benefit of using the concrete jersey barrier is that it is the
most readily available style in this area. At the end of the day, any
MASH rated barrier is acceptable, but any barrier used must be
installed according to manufacturer’s specifications. Notably, any
clear/buffer zone required between the barrier and the patio must be
observed.
A requirement that roadside barriers be installed according to manufacturer’s
specifications has been included in the Patio Permit By-law, consistent with
comments received from the Director of Public Works and Engineering.
Examples of TL-1, TL-2, and TL-3 roadside barriers that would meet or
exceed the requirements of the OTC Guidelines, and the associated cost of
rental, are attached as Schedule ‘C’. The supply, installation, and removal of
roadside barriers within the City’s road allowance will be required to be at
the expense of the patio operator. A user pay system is consistent with the
approach of other municipalities in Ontario, including the Municipality of
Meaford (see Staff Report DEV2025-29). As demonstrated in Schedule ‘C’,
costs associated with roadside barrier rental are expected to be between
$2,100 and $2,500 for a six (6) month season (May 1 to October 31), based
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 7 of 15

Page 45 of 114

on a Curb Lane Patio located within one (1) on-street parking space, and
depending on the type of barrier selected by the operator.
Comments from the Community Services Committee were also received that
question whether the OTC Restaurant Patio Guidelines are voluntary versus
mandatory and noted concerns with the appearance of the roadside barriers
within the downtown.
Traditionally, the City has permitted patios within on-street parking spaces
with the installation of two (2) curb stops and planter boxes provided at
either end of the patio. Based on OTC guidance, this type of patio delineation
is not sufficient for providing any level of protection for restaurant patrons or
staff against an errant vehicle. Ultimately, staff cannot recommend that
patios be permitted within on-street parking without the installation of
proper barricades, in the interest of maintaining public health and safety.
While compliance with the OTC Guidelines is not provincially
legislated, it is consistent with the advice of the City’s insurer and is
the practice followed widely by other municipalities in Ontario.
As it relates to the appearance of roadside barriers, the Patio Permit By-law
would permit a patio operator to utilize hanging plant materials to buffer the
appearance of the barrier, though this would not be a mandatory
requirement.

Temporary Encroachment Permit
The Patio Permit By-law clarifies that the provisions of the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law do not apply to street furniture and sidewalk patios,
where a patio permit has been obtained and a patio agreement has been
executed with the City.
A temporary road closure in accordance with the Ontario Traffic Manual Book
7 will be required for Curb Lane Patios to facilitate installation and removal of
the required roadside barriers. A Temporary Traffic Control Plan is required
to be submitted as part of a complete patio permit application for a Curb
Lane Patio, and the City’s Engineering Services Division will provide review
and comment through this process. A separate temporary encroachment
permit and fee is not required.
Standard conditions of the City’s Temporary Encroachment Permit, where
applicable, will be incorporated into the City’s patio agreement, in
accordance with comments received from the City’s Engineering Services
Division.
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 8 of 15

Page 46 of 114

Streamlining
In consulting with the City’s River District Coordinator, Planning staff have
identified an opportunity to streamline the application approval process for
the placement of street furniture and sidewalk patios within the right-of-way.
Specifically, the proposed Patio Permit By-law provides a process for patio
permit renewals, where there is no change in layout and a patio agreement
with the City is in effect.
An application for a patio permit renewal is limited to the following:
1.

Proof of liability insurance in the amount of $5,000,000,
indemnifying the City as an additional insured.

2.

A copy of the patio operator’s liquor licence, if applicable.

3.

For a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers.

As discussed in the Fees and Charges section of this report, Planning staff
are also recommending a reduced fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and
curbside patio renewals.

Delegation and Appeals Process
In 2021, City Council delegated approval authority for sidewalk patios to the
City Manager, in consultation with the Director of Community Services,
Director of Public Works and Engineering, and the Manager of Planning and
Heritage, and subject to AGCO approval for a licenced patio in accordance
with the provisions established in the Province’s Stage 2 re-opening
guidelines applicable at the time, including:






Design, layout, and placement.
Execution of agreement.
Provision of correspondence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission
of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no objection to extension of liquor
licences.
Waive all fees.

Comments from the Community Services Committee questioned whether the
City Manager is the appropriate delegate for sidewalk patios. Staff note that
the delegation and certain limits thereof, were put in place during the
COVID-19 pandemic, to provide staff flexibility in responding to a rapidly
changing emergency situation.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 9 of 15

Page 47 of 114

Certain aspects of the delegation warrant review in the context of the
updated Patio Permit By-law, however, staff delegated approval for sidewalk
patios has generally worked well and resulted in improved customer service
to patio operators. With delegation, staff were generally able to issue patio
approvals within seven to ten business days.
The Patio Permit By-law proposes that the authority to issue patio permits
and renewals, with or without conditions, and refuse to issue or renew a
patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio permit, be delegated to the
Director of Community Services and the Director of Public Works and
Engineering, or their designates, acting jointly.
The delegation of patio permits and renewals to senior management
continues to ensure a streamlined approvals process that patio operators are
accustomed to. Having both the Director of Community Services and the
Director of Public Works and Engineering serve as the delegates ensures that
input from both Planning and Engineering is considered in the approvals
process.
The authority to execute patio agreements and provide correspondence to
the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no
objection to the extension of liquor licences for a licenced patio are also
proposed to remain delegated to staff and conferred to the Director of
Community Services and the Director of Public Works and Engineering, as
these are administrative functions necessary for ensuring implementation of
the Patio Permit By-law. The authority to waive patio fees and reference to
the Province’s Stage 2 reopening under the limits of the current delegation
will be removed as part of the recommended update to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law, as these are no longer relevant.
Staff note that there are limited circumstances in which a patio permit or
renewal would be refused, suspended or revoked, as set out in Section 29 of
the by-law, however, in the interest of maintaining procedural fairness, the
by-law establishes an appeals process for patio permit refusals or revocation
that would be considered by the City Manager.

Fees and Charges
In May of 2022, the Community Services Committee considered Staff Report
CS-22-065, respecting Patio Funding Options, and recommended that City
Council direct staff to bring forward an amendment to the City’s Fees and
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 10 of 15

Page 48 of 114

The City’s current fees for street furniture and sidewalk patios are as follows:
Patio Type

Current Fee

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
amenity strip

$50 per business, per year

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
parking stalls

$200 for the first two (2) parking
stalls, $100 per each additional stall.

The current fee structure warrants an update to, among other matters, align
the fees with the new patio definitions provided under the Patio Permit Bylaw. The fees proposed by staff are as follows:
Patio Type

Proposed Fee

First-year street furniture, frontage
patio, or curbside patio, as defined
by the Patio Permit By-law

$50 per business

Street furniture, frontage patio, or
curbside patio renewals

No fee where the following
conditions are met:
a. No change to the street
furniture or frontage patio
and/or curbside patio layout is
proposed.
b. A patio agreement has been
executed with the City and the
term of such agreement has
not expired.
For clarity, if either of the above
noted conditions are not satisfied,
the $50 first-year application fee
would apply.

Curb Lane Patio (new or renewal)

$100 per parking stall per month,
maximum two (2) parking stalls.

The intent of the revised street furniture and sidewalk patio fees
recommended through Staff Report CS-22-065, was to ensure that street
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 11 of 15

Page 49 of 114

furniture and patios proposed within the limits of the sidewalk (i.e., at the
building face or curbside) were attainable for businesses, particularly those
not centered around food service. The updated fee structure proposed by
staff maintains this intent and, subject to conditions, provides a reduced fee
for street furniture, frontage patio, and curbside patio renewals, to further
encourage this type of patio within the downtown to activate the streetscape.
Fees for Curb Lane Patios are proposed to be increased to $100 per parking
stall per month, to align with the City’s existing fee to rent an on-street
parking space ($50 per week). Parking stalls are capped at a maximum of
two (2), to align with the definition of a Curb Lane Patio provided by the
Patio Permit By-law. A greater fee for Curb Lane Patios is appropriate, given
the larger size/scale that results in additional review and monitoring by City
staff.

Insurance
The Patio Permit By-law continues to require that patio operators carry and
provide proof of liability insurance for the operation of the street furniture or
patio, indemnifying the City as the owner of the public lands on which the
patio or street furniture is situated. The amount of liability insurance required
has been increased from $2,000,000, to $5,000,000, consistent with
comments received from the City’s insurer, the Purchasing and Claims
Coordinator, and the Engineering Services Division.

Accessibility
As outlined in Staff Report CS-26-013, patio operators are required to
provide a patio layout that maintains a sufficient accessible route on the
sidewalk for pedestrians. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act
(AODA) requires the width of the accessible route to be a minimum of 1.5
metres. The OTC Guidelines for Restaurant Patios and other municipalities
with updated guidelines (e.g., City of Guelph, City of Kingston), require the
accessible route to be 1.8 metres.
Planning staff consulted with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee on the desired width of the accessible route at its meeting on
April 17, 2026. Based on this consultation, the Patio Permit By-law requires a
patio operator to design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient accessible route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width, as follows:

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 12 of 15

Page 50 of 114

a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street
East: 1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres.

The intent of the by-law is to require that a greater accessible route be
provided where the width of the right-of-way is larger.

Resource Alignment:
Financial Resources
There are no anticipated impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the Patio
Permit By-law.
It is recommended that staff be directed to update the City’s existing fees
and charges for patios to, among other matters, align with the patio
definitions provided under the new by-law.
Fees generated from street furniture and sidewalk patios are generally low,
as the City receives a low number of applications each year.

Human Resources
Processing of patio applications will be completed within the existing
operating budget. The Planning & Heritage Division administers the program
on an annual basis, with input from the City’s Development Team, including
Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire.
It is recommended that approval authority for patios continue to be
delegated to staff. Amendments are recommended to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law to delegate approval authority for patios and the
execution of patio agreements to the Director of Community Services and
the Director of Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly.
Processing timelines for patio applications is dependent on the size and
location of a proposed patio, however, with an updated by-law, it is expected
that application review timelines will be reduced. The by-law also provides a
more streamlined approach for street furniture and patio renewals.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 13 of 15

Page 51 of 114

Time and Scheduling
The updated Patio Permit By-law has been completed as part of the Planning
& Heritage Division’s 2026 Work Plan.

Technology and Infrastructure
The City’s Cloudpermit system will be used to manage patio applications
beginning in 2027 and on a go forward basis.

Climate and Environmental Impacts:
There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts.

Communication and Engagement:
The draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were circulated to
the City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, Engineering
Services, Environmental Services, and Clerks staff, as well as the City’s River
District Coordinator, Communications staff, City Fire Prevention Services.
and Police Services for review and comment on February 10, 2026.
An internal staff meeting to discuss the draft guidelines and obtain feedback
was held on February 19, 2026.
Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
draft guideline at its meeting on March 11, 2026, the Community Services
Committee on March 18, 2026, and the Grey County Joint Accessibility
Advisory Committee on April 17, 2026.
Feedback on the updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines was
requested from all River District Business owners on March 24, 2026 through
the River District newsletter.
The Patio Permit By-law was developed in consultation with the City’s
Manager of Legislative Services and By-law Enforcement.
Feedback received from the various stakeholders is outlined in the Analysis
section of this report and has been incorporated into the final by-law.

Report Developed in Consultation With:
In updating the draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, staff consulted the following
documents:
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 14 of 15

Page 52 of 114











Ontario Traffic Council Restaurant Patio Guidelines within the Right
of Way (April 2022)
City of Guelph Seasonal Patio Program Guidelines
City of Kingston Street Patio Standards and Application Guide
Municipality of Meaford Corporate Policy – Commercial Patio on
Municipal Lands
Prince Edward County Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
City of London Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
Municipality of Kincardine By-law No. 2021-069, being a by-law to
regulation seasonal on-street patios.
City of Ottawa Right of Way Patio By-law No. 2023-230
Loyalist Township Patio Licence By-law 2012-025

Attachments:
Schedule ‘A’ – Patio Permit By-law
Schedule ‘B’ – Set Fines and Short Form Wording
Schedule ‘C’ – Roadside Barriers
Reviewed by:
Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning & Heritage
Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services
Submission approved by:
Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services (Acting City Manager)
For more information on this report, please contact Jacklyn Iezzi, Senior
Planner at planning@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1261.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 15 of 15

Page 53 of 114

By-law No. 2026-XXX

Patio Permit By-law
Table of Contents

Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope .............................................. 1
Part II. Interpretation ....................................................................... 2
Schedules ......................................................................................... 2
Part III. Administration .................................................................... 3
Delegation ........................................................................................ 3
Part IV. Permit Required ................................................................... 4
Permit required ................................................................................. 4
Part V. Application for Permit ............................................................ 4
Submitting an application ................................................................... 4
Issuing licences ................................................................................. 6
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation .......................................... 6
Grounds ........................................................................................... 6
Notice .............................................................................................. 7
Danger to health or safety .................................................................. 8
Appeals ............................................................................................ 8
Part VII. Operation Requirements ..................................................... 8
Timing .............................................................................................. 8
Responsibilities .................................................................................. 8
General Prohibitions ........................................................................... 9
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice ....................................... 10
Inspections ..................................................................................... 10
Obstruction ..................................................................................... 10
Orders ............................................................................................ 10
Notice ............................................................................................ 11
Part IX. Offence and Penalty ........................................................... 11
Part X. Effective Date ...................................................................... 12

Page 54 of 114

Consolidated Version
Last revised on XXX
Revision History:

Passed On:

2026-XXX (original)

Description of
amendment
-

Consolidated for Convenience Only
This is a consolidation copy of a City of Owen Sound By-law for convenience
and information. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this
by-law, it is not an official version or a legal document. The original by-law
should be consulted for all interpretations and applications on this subject.
For more information or to view by-laws please contact the Clerks
Department.

Page 55 of 114

The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound
By-law No. 2026-XXX
A By-law to licence, regulate and govern
the construction, erection and operation of
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patios on Public Lands
WHEREAS subsection 5(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, c. 25 (the
“Municipal Act”) provides that a municipal power shall be exercised by by-law;
and
WHEREAS subsection 11(2) of the Municipal Act authorizes the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Owen Sound (the “City”) to pass by-laws with respect
to the public assets of the Town, for the economic, social and environmental
well-being of the Town, and for the health, safety and well-being of persons; and
WHEREAS section 11(3) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to pass bylaws respecting the following spheres of jurisdiction: highways, structures,
parking and business licensing;
WHEREAS sections 23.1 to 23.6 of the Municipal Act authorize City Council to
delegate its powers and duties under the Municipal Act or any other Act to a
person or body, subject to the restrictions set out in the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS it is the opinion of City Council that the powers and duties being
delegated in this by-law are of a minor nature, in accordance with sections
23.2(4) and 23.2(5) of the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS section 151(1) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to provide
for a system of licences with respect to a business; and
bring forward the subject by-law for approval, in consideration of staff report CS26-031;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OWEN
SOUND HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope
Short Title
1.

The by-law may be referred to as the “Patio Permit By-law” and, when so
referenced, includes all future amendments, unless otherwise specified.

Purpose
2.

This by-law has been enacted to:
a.

encourage the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants, cafes,
and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street furniture and
amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian friendly builtenvironment, particularly within the City’s River District and Harbour
area; and

b.

ensure that universal accessibility, public safety, and the streetscape
experience are enhanced and not negatively impacted by the
introduction of a patio on public lands.
Page 56 of 114

PAGE 2

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Scope
3.

This by-law applies to the City of Owen Sound in its entirety. However, for
clarity, patios are only permitted where the City’s Zoning By-law would
permit a commercial use and where there is an area on adjacent public
lands that can meet the requirements of this by-law.
Part II. Interpretation

Headings
4.

The division of this by-law into parts and the insertion of headings are for
convenient reference only and do not affect the interpretation of the bylaw.

Gender and Number
5.

In this by-law, unless the contrary intention is indicated, words used in the
singular include the plural and words imparting a gender include all
genders, where applicable.

References to Applicable Law
6.

All references to applicable law are ambulatory and apply as amended,
extended or re-enacted from time to time.

Schedules
7.

Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements is attached to and forms part of this
by-law.

Severability
8.

In the event any provisions of this by-law are deemed invalid or void, in
whole or in part, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

Definitions
9.

For the purposes of this by-law:
“Accessible Route(s)” means a continuous, unobstructed path connecting
accessible elements and spaces;
“Cane Detectable” means leading edges that are within a cane sweep area;
“City” means the City of Owen Sound and a reference to the City is a
reference to the geographical area or to The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound as the context requires;
“City Manager” means the City Manager of The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Contiguous to frontage” means the patio space is located directly in front
of or adjacent to the building that houses the business for which the patio
application was approved;
“Curbside Patio” means a patio located on the exterior edge of the
sidewalk, adjacent to the curb, with an Accessible Route located between
the building and the patio;
“Curb Lane Patio” means a patio located within a maximum of two (2) onstreet parking spaces;
Page 57 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

“Director” means the Director of Community Services and Director of
Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly, and includes their designates;
“Frontage Patio” means a patio located immediately adjacent to the
building but extending beyond the front property line onto public lands;
“Patio” means a seasonal structure or installation of street furniture on
public lands for commercial use and includes:
a.

A Frontage Patio;

b.

A Curbside Patio; and,

c.

A Curb Lane Patio;

“Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership or association, and
their heirs, executors, assignees and administrators;
“Permit” means a permit for a patio issued under this by-law and may be
referred to as a Patio Permit;
“Public lands” means any property under the care and control of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Officer” means any person authorized by the City to enforce by-laws and
includes a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer appointed to enforce the bylaws of the City or a police officer while in the course of their duties;
“Operator” means the person or business applying for a permit or renewal
of a permit under this by-law;
“Owner” means the person(s) on title as the owner(s) of a building or
parcel of land identified on a parcel register from the Land Registry Office;
“Street Furniture” means those objects and pieces of equipment that work
to enrich the utility and aesthetic value of the street and includes, but is
not limited to, benches, flowerpots, retail or merchandise tables, and patio
furniture; and
“Tactile Tape” means a textured, adhesive strip applied to the surface of
the sidewalk and perimeter of a Patio that is yellow or white in colour, to
provide touch-based guidance or warning cues, especially for people with
visual impairments.
Part III. Administration
Delegation
10.

The administration of this by-law is assigned to the Director who will
generally perform the administrative functions conferred upon them by this
by-law, and without limitation may:
a.

delegate any responsibilities to an employee of the City, conferred to
the Director under this by-law;

b.

receive and process all applications for patio permits and renewals of
patio permits under this by-law;

c.

issue patio permits and renew patio permits in accordance with the
provisions of this by-law;

Page 58 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

impose conditions on patio permits at the time of issuance, renewal
or any other time during the patio season, in accordance with this
by-law and as necessary to give effect to this by-law;

e.

execute patio agreements between operators and the City required
in fulfillment of a condition of a patio permit or renewal, in
accordance with this by-law; and

f.

refuse to issue or renew a patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio
permit, in accordance with this by-law.
Part IV. Permit Required

Permit required
11.

No person shall construct, erect or operate a patio, or cause a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated, or authorize a patio to be constructed,
erected, or operated, without first obtaining a permit in accordance with
the provisions of this by-law.
Part V. Application for Permit

Submitting an application
12.

The Director will receive, process, and review all applications for patio
permits and renewals under this by-law.

13.

No Operator is entitled to apply for a permit or to renew a permit if in the
year prior to the application, the Operator had their permit revoked by the
Director.

14.

Between January 1 and April 1 of each year, an Operator shall file an
application for a patio permit in such form and detail as the Director may
prescribe from time to time, which application shall include, at the
Operator’s cost, the following:
a.

A completed application form that includes the name, telephone
number, and email address of the Operator and owner, if not the
same person, along with the address of the proposed patio.

b.

A detailed site plan and elevation drawings, which may be a hand
drawn sketch, submitted in .jpeg or .pdf format provided it is fully
dimensioned, showing:

c.

i.

the location and dimensions of the proposed patio;

ii.

the premises to which the patio will be appurtenant;

iii.

the location of all relevant lot lines; and

iv.

all existing surface features located between the premises and
the roadway.

A description of the proposed patio and of all materials to be used in
the construction and operation of the patio, including all
appurtenances such as:
i.

canopies, umbrellas, and/or awnings;

ii.

platforms;

iii.

railings and/or fencing;

iv.

any proposed landscaping, such as ground or hanging planter
boxes;
Page 59 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

v.

lighting;

vi.

signage;

vii.

waste storage;

viii.

heaters;

ix.

furniture, including, without limitation, tables, chairs, picnic
tables or benches, and including the proposed material and
colour of such furniture; and

x.

roadside barriers where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed;

d.

photos of the proposed patio location and existing streetscape;

e.

a copy of the Operator’s business licence;

f.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable;

g.

where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed, a Traffic Control Plan for the
installation and removal of roadside barriers in accordance with
Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7; and

h.

any other information required by the Director to approve the
application and determine compliance with this by-law.

15.

Where a patio permit is approved by the Director, the Operator shall enter
into a patio agreement with the City, which may specify conditions for setup and operation of the patio, among other matters. The term of the patio
agreement shall be a minimum of one (1) year and may be up to a
maximum of five (5) years, at the sole discretion of the Director.

16.

The Operator shall provide evidence of insurance, satisfactory to the
Director and in accordance with the provisions of subsection 37.b. of this
by-law, prior to the issuance of a patio permit.

17.

An Operator shall apply for a patio permit for each season that the
applicant wishes to place a patio within the municipal right-of-way.

18.

Notwithstanding section 17 above, the Director will consider approval of
patio permit renewals, where there is no proposed change to the patio
layout, including any appurtenances thereto, iand a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and remains in force and effect.

19.

A patio permit that is not renewed prior to the end date specified in the
patio agreement with the City is no longer valid and requires a new
application.

20.

An application for a patio permit renewal pursuant to section 18 of this bylaw shall be submitted between January 1 and April 1 of each year, and
accompanied by the following, at the Operator’s cost:

21.

a.

proof of insurance, satisfactory to the Director and in accordance
with the provisions of subsection 37(b) of this by-law;

b.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable; and

c.

for a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers in accordance with Ontario Traffic
Manual Book 7.

Upon submission of a complete patio permit application or renewal by the
Operator, as the case may be, the Director will calculate the required fees
based on the patio type and provide an invoice to the Operator. The
Page 60 of 114

PAGE 6

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Operator shall pay the fees owing in full by April 15 of each year
otherwise, the patio permit will be refused.
22.

The application fee is non-refundable regardless of whether or not the
Director approves a permit and regardless of whether or not the Director
imposes any conditions on the permit.

23.

Patio permit applications and renewals are required to be submitted via the
City’s online permitting system in effect at the time of the application or
renewal.

24.

The Director shall request comments from the City’s Development Team,
including Planning, Building, and Engineering Services staff, as well as City
Fire Prevention and Police Services, prior to making a determination on a
new patio application or renewal, as the case may be.

25.

The City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, and
Engineering Services staff, as well as City Fire Prevention and Police
Services are responsible for reviewing applications and providing feedback
on any revisions required prior to approval. To determine approval, City
staff will evaluate an application based on:

26.

a.

compliance with the requirements of this by-law;

b.

suitability of the location and any impacts on existing services;

c.

accessibility of the patio and surrounding area;.

d.

safety of the patio set-up, location, and materials; and

e.

design quality and functionality of the patio layout.

The submission of an application for a permit, including the related fee(s)
does not entitle an Operator to construct, erect, or operate a patio. The
Operator is only entitled to construct, erect, and operate a patio once the
permit has been issued under the provisions of this by-law, including the
execution of a patio agreement pursuant to section 15, and a satisfactory
inspection by the City’s Building Division in accordance with section 37.d.

Issuing licences
27.

When an application for a patio or renewal is made in accordance with Part
V of this by-law and the Operator meets all the requirements of this bylaw, the Director will issue a permit.

28.

The permit may include one or more conditions to be fulfilled by the
Operator, at the discretion of the Director.
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation

Grounds
29.

The Director may refuse to issue or renew or may suspend or revoke a
patio permit where:
a.

the Operator has failed to pay the required fees, pursuant to section
21 of this by-law;

b.

an application or other document provided to the Director by an
Operator contains a false statement or false information;

c.

the Operator’s existing permit has been suspended or revoked
pursuant to this by-law;

Page 61 of 114

PAGE 7

30.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

the Operator is indebted to the City in respect of fines, penalties,
judgements, outstanding property taxes, or any other amounts
owing;

e.

the Operator, or the property to which the patio is accessory, is
subject to an order, or orders made pursuant to applicable law,
including but not limited to a City by-law, the Building Code Act, the
Fire Protection and Prevention Act, and the Health Protection and
Promotion Act;

f.

the Operator does not comply with any of the requirements of:
i.

this by-law and all other applicable City laws or by-laws
including, but not limited to, the City’s Noise Bylaw,
Encroachment By-law, Zoning By-law, Property Standards Bylaw, and Waste Management By-law;

ii.

the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, as applicable;
or

iii.

any other federal or provincial laws affecting the operation of
the patio;

g.

the Operator has three (3) or more contraventions of City laws or
by-laws within a six-month period or four (4) or more contraventions
of City laws or by-laws within a calendar year;

h.

the permit was issued in error or granted based on incorrect or false
information; or

i.

the Director becomes aware of a fact or facts that, if known at the
time of the application, may have resulted in the Director refusing to
issue the permit.

Where the Operator’s insurance policy expires, is cancelled, or is otherwise
terminated, the applicable patio permit and patio agreement are
automatically suspended effective on the date of such expiration,
cancellation or termination and remain suspended until such insurance has
been reinstated.

Notice
31.

Where the Director refuses to issue or renew a patio permit or where the
Director elects to suspend or revoke a permit:
a.

the Director will send written notice advising the Operator of the
refusal, suspension or revocation of the permit;

b.

the written notice will be sent in accordance with the notice
provisions set out in section 50 of this by-law;

c.

the written notice will:
i.

set out the grounds for the refusal, suspension or revocation;

ii.

be signed;

iii.

indicate the final date and time by which the applicant or
licensee may appeal the decision of the Director and the
method for doing so; and

iv.

indicate the appeals fee, as set out in the City’s Fees and
Charges By-law.

Page 62 of 114

PAGE 8

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Danger to health or safety
32.

Notwithstanding section 31 above, the Director, if satisfied that the
continuation of a permit poses a danger to the health or safety of any
person, may for the time and on such conditions as are considered
appropriate, suspend a permit for not more than fourteen (14) days
without a hearing. If, after the suspension period has elapsed, the Director
is satisfied that the continuation of a permit will continue to pose a danger
to the health or safety of any person, they may further suspend for not
more than fourteen (14) days or revoke the permit.

Appeals
33.

An Operator who has been refused a permit in accordance with section 29
may appeal the refusal to the City Manager by submitting a request for
review to the office of the City Manager within fourteen (14) days of the
refusal.

34.

Where a permit is refused, the Director will advise the applicant of the
appeal option and provide further information on the process in effect at
the time of the refusal.

35.

The decision of the City Manager issued under this by-law is final.
Part VII. Operation Requirements

Timing
36.

No person may construct, erect or operate a patio or allow a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated between November 1 of any year and
April 30 of the following year.

Responsibilities
37.

Every Operator shall:
a.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in compliance with
applicable laws, including but not limited to:
i.

the Health Protection and Promotion Act;

ii.

the Fire Protection and Prevention Act;

iii.

the Building Code Act;

iv.

the Liquor Licence and Control Act;

v.

the Cannabis Control Act;

vi.

the Smoke Free Ontario Act;

vii.

the City’s:
1. Fireworks By-law;
2. Noise By-law;
3. Nuisance By-law;
4. Property Standards By-law;
5. Snow Removal By-law;
6. Unauthorized Parking By-law;
7. Waste Management By-law; and
8. Zoning By-law;
Page 63 of 114

PAGE 9

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

b.

carry a minimum of five-million dollars ($5,000,000) liability
insurance for the operation of their patio, indemnifying the City as
the owner of the public lands on which the patio is situated;

c.

construct, erect and operate their patio in accordance with the
associated patio agreement, where executed with the City;

d.

obtain a satisfactory inspection from the Chief Building Official
following patio installation, and prior to commencing operation;

e.

keep their patio clean and in good repair at all times with ongoing
and proactive maintenance;

f.

return the public lands on which thier patio is placed to its original
condition after the season. All patio objects including, but not limited
to, platforms, fencing, roadside barriers, and furniture, must be
removed from public lands at the end of the season and stored
elsewhere;

g.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in a manner that is
contiguous to the business’ frontage; and

h.

clean and maintain the public land under and directly adjacent to
their patio, including, without limitation, the sidewalk, roadway, and
gutter that may be inaccessible to City equipment due to the patios’s
location.

38.

Notwithstanding subsection 37(a) of this by-law, the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law does not apply to a patio, so long as the
requirements of this by-law are met, including that a patio agreement has
been executed with the City.

39.

Where, at any time, there is a change in, or relating to, any of the
information or documents required to be filed with an application under
this by-law, every Operator must report the change in writing to the
Director no later than fifteen (15) days following the change. Examples of
information that may change include:
a.

contact information;

b.

patio layout or configuration;

c.

fire safety measures; or

d.

insurance.

General Prohibitions
40.

41.

No Operator or Owner may construct, erect, or operate, or permit the
construction, erection, or operation of a patio:
a.

without a valid patio permit issued under this by-law;

b.

without a patio agreement executed with the City;

c.

while their patio permit is under suspension or revoked;

d.

except in accordance with the regulations of this by-law, including
Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements; and

e.

except in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable
patio permit and patio agreement, as the case may be.

No Operator may:

Page 64 of 114

PAGE 10

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

a.

transfer or assign a patio permit, without the express consent of the
Director;

b.

alter a patio’s design or layout contrary to the conditions of the patio
permit or patio agreement; or

c.

obtain a patio permit by providing false or incorrect information.
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice

Inspections
42.

The Director or an officer may at any reasonable time enter upon and
inspect the land of any person to ensure that the provisions of this by-law
are complied with.

43.

For the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this by-law, an
officer may:

44.

a.

require the production for inspection of documents or things relevant
to the inspection;

b.

inspect and remove documents or things relevant to the inspection
for the purpose of making copies or extracts;

c.

require information from any person concerning a matter related to
the inspection; and

d.

alone, or in conjunction with a person possessing special or expert
knowledge, make examinations or take tests, samples or
photographs necessary for the purpose of inspection.

The Director or an officer will provide a receipt for any document or thing
removed under subsection 43(b) and the document or thing will be
promptly returned after the copies or extracts are made.

Obstruction
45.

No person shall prevent, hinder, or obstruct, or attempt to prevent, hinder
or obstruct anyone who is lawfully exercising a power or performing a duty
under this by-law.

46.

Any person who has been alleged to have contravened any of the
provisions of this by-law must identify themselves to the Director or officer
upon request. Failure to do so will result in the person being deemed to
have obstructed or hindered the Director or officer in the execution of their
duties.

Orders
47.

An officer may make an order requiring the person who contravened this
by-law, or who caused or permitted the contravention, or the owner or
occupier of the land on which the contravention occurred, to discontinue
the contravening activity or to do work to correct the contravention.

48.

An order made pursuant to section 47 must:
a.

include the reasonable particulars of the contravention adequate to
identify the contravention and the location of the land on which the
contravention occurred;

b.

include the date by which there must be compliance with the order
and/or the work to be done and the date by which the work must be
done;
Page 65 of 114

PAGE 11
c.

49.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

direct that if the thing or matter that is required to be done is not
completed by the time set out in subsection 48(b), the matter or
thing will be done by the City at the person’s expense and the City
may recover the costs of doing the matter or thing from the person
directed or required to do it by action or by adding the costs to the
tax roll and collecting them in the same manner as property taxes.

Every person must comply with an order made pursuant to section 47.

Notice
50.

51.

Any notice or order issued pursuant to this by-law may be given in writing
in any of the following ways and is effective:
a.

on the date on which a copy is delivered to the person to whom it is
addressed;

b.

on the fifth day after a copy is sent by mail to the person’s last
known address;

c.

upon the sending of a copy by e-mail transmission to the person’s
last know email address; or

d.

posting on the premises, on the date of posting.

For the purpose of section 50, a person’s last known address and last
known email address are deemed to include information on the last revised
assessment roll and on an application submitted pursuant to this by-law.
Part IX. Offence and Penalty

52.

Every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law, or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, is guilty of an offence
and liable to a fine of:
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
53.

Where a corporation contravenes any provision of this by-law or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, and every director or
officer of a corporation who commits, concurs, assents to, or acquiesces to
such contravention, is guilty of an offence and is liable to a fine of
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties, as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
54.

In addition to any penalty otherwise provided for in this by-law, every
person convicted of an offence under this by-law is liable to a fine of not
more than $10,000 for each day during which the offence continues.

55.

Upon conviction any penalty imposed under this by-law may be collected
under the authority of the Provincial Offences Act.

56.

If a person is convicted of an offence for contravening a provision of this
by-law or an order made under this by-law, the court in which the
Page 66 of 114

PAGE 12

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

conviction has been entered, and any court of competent jurisdiction
thereafter, may order the person to correct the contravention in such
manner and within such period as the court considers appropriate.
Part X. Effective Date
57.

This by-law comes into full force and effect on May 1, 2026 at which time
all by-laws, policies or resolutions that are inconsistent with the provisions
of this by-law are hereby repealed or rescinded insofar as it is necessary to
give effect to the provisions of this by-law.
FINALLY PASSED AND ENACTED this 27 day of April, 2026.

Mayor Ian C. Boddy

Briana M. Bloomfield, City Clerk

Page 67 of 114

Schedule ‘A’ to By-law No. 2026-XXX
Patio Permit By-law
Part I. Design Requirements
Layout
1.

A Frontage Patio, Curbside Patio, and a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this
by-law, are permitted on public lands.

2.

A Curb Lane Patio is permitted within a maximum of two (2) on-street
parking spaces or a curb lane and is only permitted on roadways with:
a.

A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.

b.

No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).

c.

On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

3.

The width of the public lands between the building’s face and the edge of
the curb must be a minimum of 3 metres, before a Frontage Patio or a
Curbside Patio will be considered.

4.

A Curbside Patio will only be permitted where adjacent to on-street
parking.

5.

A Curbside Patio shall be setback 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb,
unless adjacent to a Curb Lane Patio.

6.

An Operator shall design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient Accessible Route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width as follows:
a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street East:
1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres

7.

The Accessible Route required by Section 6 of Schedule A of this by-law
shall be maintained in a straight line within a street block and be located at
least 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb.

8.

Patio layouts that propose a pedestrian clearway into a parking or curb
lane are prohibited.

9.

A Frontage Patio and Curbside Patio are not permitted to encroach upon
the frontage of neighbouring properties without explicit consent.

10.

Permission to utilize on-street parking spaces in front of neighbouring
properties is not required for a Curb Lane Patio, as long as the
requirements of this by-law are met.
Page 68 of 114

PAGE 2
11.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

City street furniture including, but not limited to, benches, trees, bollards,
or poles, must be kept free and clear from all encumbrances and access
must be maintained to hanging planters and other horticultural
installations adjacent to the patio area.

Platforms
12.

A Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this by-law, requires the installation of a
platform to bring the patio surface at grade with the sidewalk.

13.

All platforms shall:
a.

Be firm, flat, stable, and have a non-slip, level surface with a
difference in elevation of no more than six (6) millimetres.

b.

Be constructed of composite, metal, or wood decking material.

c.

Have spaces between decking no more than one (1) centimetre in
width, so as to not allow canes, walkers, wheels or other mobility
assistance devices from becoming lodged or stuck between them.

d.

Have entrances from the sidewalk that are a minimum of 1.2 metres
in width.

e.

Have fencing installed along the perimeter, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law, where
there is a change in elevation between the adjacent surface.

f.

Not obstruct stormwater flows or block stormwater drains. The
Operator shall be responsible for clearance of any debris and overall
maintenance to ensure free flow.

g.

Not be affixed to the sidewalk, road, or curb edge with screws, bolts,
adhesives, or any other materials.

Roadside Barriers
14.

A Curb Lane Patio requires the installation of roadside barriers to mitigate
the risk of an errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons
seated at tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.

15.

Roadside barriers are required to be provided and installed in the City road
allowance at the expense of the Operator.

16.

Roadside barrier installation and removal are required to be completed by
a qualified contractor trained in the Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.

17.

Roadside barriers shall:
a.

Be placed between 25 and 45 degrees upstream of the limits of a
Curb Lane Patio to protect from lateral impact.

b.

Be installed entirely within the limits of on-street parking spaces and
shall not encroach into any driving lane.

c.

Be installed according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

d.

Be a minimum of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety
Hardware) tested, in accordance with Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.
TL-2 and TL-3 MASH tested barriers may also be accepted.

e.

Be equipped with an appropriate amount of retroreflective material
to provide adequate daytime and night-time visibility.

Page 69 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Fencing
18.

Where possible, the requirement for fencing shall be minimized to reduce
visual clutter.

19.

A Frontage Patio and/or a Curbside Patio consisting of less than 15 tables
are not required to have fencing however, the perimeter of the patio area
is required to be delineated with tactile tape, as defined by this by-law, for
the benefit of the visually impaired.

20.

The Operator shall comply with all requirements of the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario as it relates to fencing of a licensed patio area.

21.

A Curb Lane Patio is required to have fencing, regardless of whether the
patio is licensed to serve alcohol or not.

22.

Where fencing is required, the following requirements shall be met:
a.

Fencing must have a minimum height of 0.9 metres and a maximum
height of 1.2 metres from the surface of the patio.

b.

Patios with fencing are required to have an open, unobstructed
entrance from the sidewalk that is a minimum of 1.2 metres wide.
The patio entrance shall align with the entrance of the applicable
business, where possible. No appurtenances of the patio including,
but not limited to, furniture, host stands, menu boards, or umbrellas,
are permitted to impede the entrance such that the clear width is
less than 1.2 metres.

c.

Fencing is not permitted to encroach within any portion of any
Accessible Route, as defined by this by-law. Fencing adjacent to the
Accessible Route is required to have a solid, cane-detectable base,
spaced no more than 0.3 metres apart and shall have a colour
contrast to the sidewalk to make it easily identifiable to pedestrians.

d.

Fencing shall be constructed of aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or
other solid material and shall consist of a dark or neutral colour.

e.

The use of chain-link, plastic, or vinyl fencing is prohibited.

f.

Fencing shall be open and transparent to maintain visibility from the
street.

g.

Fencing shall be free of jagged edges and other safety threats
brought on by poor design or construction.

h.

Fencing must be removable, free-standing, and self-supporting with
appropriate weights. Fencing required for a Curb Lane Patio is
permitted to be secured to a platform required by Section 12 to 13 of
Schedule A of this by-law. Any stability measures must not damage
public property, must not be designed to penetrate the surface of the
sidewalk or street and must be security without endangering any
underground utilities.

i.

Fencing is not permitted to obstruct vehicular or pedestrian
sightlines, fire routes, or fire hydrants, and is not permitted to
obstruct or be attached to any City street furniture including, but not
limited to, trees, benches, or light posts.

Sightlines
23.

Street furniture or a patio, including any appurtenances thereto, shall not
obstruct vehicular or pedestrian sightlines, visibility, or movements.
Page 70 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

24.

No portion of street furniture or a patio shall obstruct the five metre by
five metre sightline triangle at City street intersections or a three metre by
three metre sightline triangle at private vehicular driveway entrances.

25.

A Curbside Patio and/or a Curb Lane Patio are not permitted within five (5)
metres of an intersection.

Furniture
26.

All patio furniture, including fencing, shall be made of durable, weather
resistant materials. Composite, metal, painted or stained wood, or other
durable material to the satisfaction of the Director, is required.

27.

Plastic, vinyl, and pressure treated wood furniture is prohibited.

28.

Patio furniture, including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, host stands,
and umbrellas are not permitted to encroach into any portion of an
Accessible Route or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

Sources of Shade
29.

The use of retractable awnings installed on the first storey of buildings is
permitted to provide shade to Frontage Patios and Curbside Patios.

30.

Awnings shall:
a.

Be installed to have a minimum height of 2.4 metres above the
walking surface.

b.

Not conflict with trees or other City street furniture within the
boulevard.

c.

Be flame-retardant in accordance with the requirements of the
Ontario Fire Code, where a fabric awning is proposed.

31.

The installation of an awning requires a Building Permit from the City’s
Chief Building Official in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario
Building Code.

32.

Umbrellas and tents are permitted appurtenant to a patio as a source of
shade.

33.

Tents must be sized 10 square metres or less. If more than one tent is
installed, they shall be 3 metres apart from each other, including from
neighbouring establishments tents. Tents must not be closed on more than
two sides. Abutting a building constitutes a closed side.

34.

Umbrellas and tents must:
a.

Stand at least 2.1 metres above the walking surface.

b.

Be flame-retardant and approved by the City’s Fire Prevention
Officer.

c.

Not encroach into any portion of an Accessible Route or obstruct a
building or patio entrance.

d.

Be properly weighed down to prevent being blown over by wind. Any
stability measures must not damage public property, must not be
designed to penetrate the surface of the sidewalk or street, and must
be secured without endangering any underground utilities.

e.

Be removed during inclement weather or high winds so as not to
create a safety hazard.

f.

Not obstruct sightlines for pedestrians, cyclists, or motorists.
Page 71 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

35.

Posts and beams and/or a gazebo, pergola, trellis roof, or other similar
type of roof construction may be permitted as part of a proposed patio,
where indicated as part of a patio application pursuant to Part V of this bylaw, and subject to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code.

36.

Except for pre-manufactured tents described above, tarps or similar
roofing material are prohibited.

Fire Safety
37.

A minimum 1.8 metres clearance from fire department connections and
fire hydrants must be maintained on a patio.

38.

Fire hydrants and fire department connections must always be visible from
the street and accessible by Fire Services.

39.

If a patio is longer than 15 metres, emergency access points through the
patio may be required by the City Fire Prevention Office. Fire routes must
not be obscured by a patio.

Heaters
40.

All Patio flames and/or heaters, per the Ontario Fire Code, must meet the
requirements of Technical Standards and Safety Authority, be assembled
in accordance with the device’s manufacturer’s specifications and
installation in accordance with the same, which encompasses locations and
distances to combustibles.

41.

If use of propane and other flammable gases in cylinders on the Patio is
exercised, the Operator shall:

42.

a.

Not store any cylinders indoors.

b.

Store cylinders in lockable, non-combustible cabinets or cages that
are designed for such storage.

c.

Not store cylinders on sidewalk or any public thoroughfare.

d.

Store cylinders at least 0.9 metres from any building opening and
3.05 metres from any building’s mechanical air intake; and,

e.

Store propane cylinders 0.9 metres from other compressed gases.

No open flames are permitted where a fabric structure including, but not
limited to, an awning, tent, or umbrella, in installed appurtenant to a patio.

Waste Storage
43.

Operators shall provide a minimum of one (1) garbage receptacle for
patrons, the size and location of which shall be indicated on the Site Plan
required as part of a patio permit application, pursuant to Part V of this bylaw.

44.

Waste storage, collection, and the use of garbage bag tags shall be in
accordance with the City’s Waste Management By-law.

Signage
45.

Menu and sandwich board signage is permitted in accordance with the
City’s Sign By-law.

46.

Signage is not permitted to encroach into any part of an Accessible Route
or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

47.

Signage is not permitted to be displayed on any patio fencing or furniture.
Page 72 of 114

PAGE 6
48.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Third-party advertisements within or on any part of the patio, including
umbrellas, are prohibited.

Plant Materials
49.

Plant materials appurtenant to a patio must be healthy, living, and
maintained throughout the season.

50.

Planter boxes are permitted to be used as fencing, where the requirements
of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law are met.

51.

Plant materials may be affixed to fencing, provided they do not protrude
more than 100 millimetres horizontally from the cane-detectable railing
and do not obstruct any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio
entrance, or driving lane.

52.

Ground planters may be used within the patio for decoration but shall not
exceed 0.5 metres in width and 1.0 metre in height. Planters with plant
material shall not exceed 1.2 metres in height.

53.

Hanging planters are permitted provide plant material does not extend
more than 0.5 metres from the hanging planter box and does not encroach
into any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio entrance, or
driving lane.

Lighting
54.

Lighting is permitted within a patio, in accordance with the following
requirements:
a.

Lighting features are required to be temporary and comply with all
applicable safety standards and code.

b.

Lights may not exceed 3 metres in height.

c.

Lighting must be restricted to low voltage (12V system). 120VAC is
not permitted.

d.

Lights and power cables are not permitted to cross any portion of an
Accessible Route, building or patio entrance.

e.

Lighting shall be downward facing, dark sky compliant, and shall not
deflect onto neighbouring properties or the City street.

f.

Lights shall not attach City street furniture including, but not limited
to, utility poles, trees, and benches.

g.

Permission must be granted to the Operator for use of a power
source, if the Operator does not own it.

Street Furniture
55.

The placement of Street Furniture, as defined by this by-law, on public
lands, shall comply with the Operation requirements of Part VII of this bylaw and the design requirements set out in Schedule “A” of this by-law.

Page 73 of 114

CITY OF OWEN SOUND
PART I – PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT

Item

By-law No. 2026-XXX:
Patio Permit By-law
COLUMN 1
Short Form Wording

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

1

Construct, erect, operate patio between Nov 1 – Apr 30

s. 36

$500

2

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio between Nov 1-Apr 30

s. 36

$500

3

Operator - Fail to carry required insurance

s. 37.b.

$1,000

4

Operator - Fail to construct, erect, operate patio in accordance with patio
agreement

s. 37.c.

$500

5

Operator - Fail to obtain satisfactory inspection from CBO before
operating patio

s. 37.d.

$400

6

Operator - Fail to keep patio clean and in good repair

s. 37.e.

$500

7

Operator - Fail to return public land to original condition after season

s. 37.f.

$500

8

Operator – Fail to construct, erect, operate patio contiguous to frontage
of Operator’s business

s. 37.g.

$400

Page 74 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

9

Operator - Fail to clean and maintain public land under or adjacent to
patio

s. 37.i.

$500

10

Operator - Fail to report change in information

s. 39

$400

11

Construct, erect, operate patio without a valid patio permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

12

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without valid patio
permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

13

Construct, erect, operate patio without an executed patio agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

14

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without executed patio
agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

15

Construct, erect, operate patio while patio permit suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

16

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio while patio permit
suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

17

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of design requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

Page 75 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

18

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of design
requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

19

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of conditions in permit or
agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

20

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of conditions
in permit or agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

21

Operator – Transfer or assign patio permit without consent

s. 41.a.

$400

22

Operator – Alter patio design/layout contrary to conditions

s. 41.b.

$1,000

23

Operator – Obtain patio permit using false or incorrect information

s. 41.c.

$500

24

Prevent/hinder/obstruct lawful exercise of power under by-law

s. 45

$500

25

Fail to identify self upon request

s. 46

$500

26

Fail to comply with an order

s. 49

$500

NOTE: the general penalty provision for the offences listed above is section 52 of the By-law, a certified copy of which
has been filed.

Page 76 of 114

SCHEDULE C
ROADSIDE BARRIER OPTIONS
Option

Cost Per Unit*

Single Unit Size
(LxWxH)

Annual Rent

A

TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water
Filled)

$50 per unit per
month

1.8 m x 0.45 m x 0.8 m

$2,400

B

TL-1 Urban Barrier

$20 per meter per
month

2.7 m x 0.15 m x 1.15 m

$2,160

C

TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

$24 per meter per
month

1.6 m x 0.8 m x 0.8 m

$2,592

* Source: Municipality of Meaford Staff Report DEV2025-029
Estimates assume a patio located within one (1) parking stall, sized 6 m in length and 3 m in width, operating for
six (6) months total (May 1 to October 31).
Prices do not include delivery or other logistical costs.

Report: CS-26-031

Page 77 of 114
1

Option A – TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water Filled)

Report: CS-26-031

Page 78 of 114
2

Option B – TL-1 Urban Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 79 of 114
3

Option C – TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 80 of 114
4

City Hall Illumination/Lighting Request Form
For full policy details outlining City Hall Illumination requests please see the Flag Flying Proclamations and Public
Awareness Campaigns policy here (City Hall Illumination starts on page 7).
Name of Requesting Organization *
Ontario Medical Association

Contact Information
Name *

Email Address *

Bianca Turchiaro

bianca.turchiaro@oma.org

Home/Cell Phone Number *

Work Phone Number
6479832424

City Hall Lighting Date(s)
Illumination requests will be granted for a maximum duration of seven (7) days unless there are no conflicting
requests in which case the duration may extend to a maximum duration of fourteen (14) days, at the discretion of
the City Manager.
Requests will be considered on a first come, first served basis, based on the date the request is received by the
City Manager’s office; requests should be made at least two (2) weeks in advance of the desired lighting date.
Please note that the changing of City Hall lights will take place on regular business days.
Starting Date of Illumination: *
5/1/2026

End Date of Illumination: *


5/1/2026



Requested Light Colours
At this time, the only colour options available are: Green, Blue, Red, White, and Pink/Purple.
No other colours are available at this time.
Please select the colour of your illumination request: *
Green
Blue
Red
White
Pink/Purple

Page 81 of 114

Details/Purpose of the illumination event: *
Every year, the Ontario Medical Association asks Ontarians to celebrate Doctors' Day and thank the amazing
doctors who work tirelessly to keep us healthy and safe. From doctors in the emergency room to specialists in
a clinic, Ontario's physicians care for all of us, even during health system issues and systemic barriers to care.
First recognized by the provincial government in 2011, the date was chosen to mark the birthday of Canada's
first female physician, Dr. Emily Stowe. In recent years, various landmarks, city halls, and other municipal
centers have lit up blue to celebrate our physicians, and we hope this year will be the biggest yet.

Description of your organization including a brief history and any other relevant information: *
The Ontario Medical Association is a not-for-profit organization that represents Ontario's 50,000+ physicians,
medical students, and retired physicians. The OMA advocates for and supports doctors while strengthening
their leadership role in patient care. We support doctors in their vision to be a trusted voice in transforming
Ontario's healthcare system. The OMA has members across the province, from Niagara Falls to Sioux
Lookout. The OMA will be promoting this event on our website and social media pages. For Doctors’ Day
2026, the sign’s likeness may appear in communications on both our website and our social media pages,
should a physician in Owen Sound send us a photo of the illumination of City Hall.

Would you like to submit your City Hall illumination request to happen annually? *
Yes, please repeat on an annual basis
No, this one time only
Please note that it is up to the person/group submitting the request to contact the City if the annual date changes
or discontinues for any reason.
By submitting this form, you affirm that the facts set forth in it are true and complete. All City Hall illumination
requests must adhere to the Flag Flying, Proclamations and Public Awareness Campaigns Policy.
The personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, 227 and City
Policy CMA34. The information is used for the City Hall lighting process including, but not limited to, evaluating
requests for illumination events and contacting the requestor.
City Manager Approval - signature & date

Date on Council Consent Agenda

Page 82 of 114

Correspondence Items Presented for Information
April 27, 2026
1)

Correspondence from AMCTO Re: Advocacy Update – Follow-Up to Budget
Update on Proposed MFIPPA Changes.

2)

Correspondence from the Deputy Clerk, City of Owen Sound Re: Regional
Governance Changes.

3)

Correspondence from the Intermediate Planner, Grey County Re: Age-Friendly
Action Plan Progress Report.

4)

Correspondence from the Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization
Branch, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Re: Proposed
Environmental Assessment Act Amendments to Improve the Comprehensive
Environmental Assessment Process.

5)

Correspondence from the Registrar, Ontario Energy Board Re: 2026 Generic
Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement Extension of
Intervention Deadline.

6)

Correspondence from the Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce
Peninsula Source Protection Committee Re: Possible Implications to the Clean
Water Act.

7)

Correspondence from the Chair, Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus Re:
Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform.

Page 83 of 114

Item 1

About AMCTO | Professional Growth | Advocacy & Policy | Network & Community

April 10, 2026
Advocacy Update: Follow-Up to Budget Update on Proposed
MFIPPA Changes
As a follow-up to our previous advocacy update outlining proposed changes
to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1990 (MFIPPA) made through the budget bill, we want to highlight our
concerns regarding the scope and depth of proposed changes on the
privacy side. These changes align the Act with similar changes made
previously to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1989 (FIPPA), but do not consider municipal staff capacity or financial
constraints.
Privacy-related changes include:
•

Requiring that the head of an institution ensure that a written
assessment is prepared and contains certain information respecting
any Personal Information (PI) that is to be collected. This includes
but is not limited to:

Page 84 of 114

o

The purpose, intended use, and explanation for collection

o

Who will have access to the PI

o

Limitations or restrictions on collection, use or disclosure

o

Safeguard practices to protect the PI

o

Steps taken to prevent the likelihood of theft, loss,
unauthorized use, or disclosure of the PI

•

Requiring that risks are mitigated by ensuring the above steps are
implemented before collecting PI

•

Requiring that institutions provide access to the written assessment
to the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC)

•

Reporting any breach of privacy safeguards to the IPC and notifying
affected individuals

•

Outlining factors to determine the real risk of significant harm

•

Removing the definition of personal information bank

•

Imposing a right of access to PI

•

Authorizing the IPC to review information practices of an institution
where the IPC has received a complaint, with authorization to resolve
the matter through mediation, conciliation, and other informal
means.

•

Requiring an institution to assist the IPC in conducting a review

While we acknowledge that many of these proposals are important best
practices moving forward, we would like to offer the following
recommendations to the Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery
for consideration:
•

Over 80% of Ontario municipalities have populations under 50,000.
In many municipalities, the administrative function is performed by a
single employee, often the municipal clerk, who manages FOI and
privacy programs along with 80 other statutory responsibilities,

Page 85 of 114

which can include council governance, bylaw enforcement, and
elections.
•

As 2026 is a municipal and school board election year, wherein
municipal budget processes are disrupted with councils inaugurated
in November, requests for resources to support new requirements
may not be contemplated until 2027. This timing makes it extremely
challenging to transition to new rules that are proposed to be in
effect by January 1, 2027.

•

The January 1 deadline for privacy impact assessments is too short a
timeframe for municipalities to address new requirements and seek
new resources, including staff and funding support to action the new
requirements.

•

The scope of the privacy impact assessments is exceptionally broad.
It is not clear whether these would apply to information collected
going forward or would also retroactively apply, which would be an
insurmountable task for already overburdened municipal staff.
o

If retroactively applied, this will likely result in substantial costs
for institutions and take years for many municipalities to come
into compliance, given the above-noted limitations.

Given the varying levels of capacity and maturity across MFIPPA
institutions, we want to understand what resources the Ministry and the
Information and Privacy Commissioner are developing to support
municipalities in this transition and when they will be made available.
In the meantime, we have prepared the following redline version of the
Act, which shows the amendments Bill 97 proposes. We hope this makes it
easier for members to see the exact changes that are being proposed.
REVIEW REDLINE VERSION OF THE ACT
We also invite you to send us your templates, policies, procedures, and
other relevant resources related to:
•

Privacy impact assessments

Page 86 of 114

•

Information management best practices

•

Risk and breach management

•

Job advertisement requirements for staffing

•

Budget/business cases for more resources

Over the coming weeks, we will be reviewing materials to determine the
best next steps for how to support members, municipal clerks, and their
staff with implementing the proposed new requirements.
Please provide any resources you'd like to share with our policy and
advocacy team by Monday, April 20.
Our team will be continuing to evaluate the proposals to determine the full
impacts on municipal administration and service delivery, and welcomes
feedback from members with expertise in FOI and privacy.
We will also be applying to speak at Standing Committee where your
feedback will help inform our submission. Please provide your feedback as
soon as possible.
We will be seeking clarity with the Ministry over the coming days and will
provide updates as appropriate.

Page 87 of 114

Item 2
Staci Landry, Deputy Clerk
City of Owen Sound
808 2nd Avenue East
Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4

Phone: 519-376-4440 ext. 1235
Facsimile: 519-371-0511
Email: slandry@owensound.ca
Website: www.owensound.ca

April 16, 2026
Via Email
Paul Vickers, MPP
Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound
paul.vickers@pc.ola.org
Dear Mr. Vickers:
Re:

Regional Governance Changes

City Council, at its meeting held on April 13, 2026, considered the above-noted
"THAT in consideration of items 1.c and 2.b on the
correspondence package (Item 11.l) listed on the April
13, 2026 Consent Agenda respecting Regional Governance
Changes, City Council directs staff to send a letter to Paul
Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound expressing
concerns with the proposed changes to the Regional
Governance Act."
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Staci Landry
Deputy Clerk

Page 88 of 114

Item 3

Committee Report
To:

Warden Matrosovs and Members of Grey County Council

Committee Date:

March 26, 2026

Subject / Report No:

PDR-CW-11-26

Title:

Progress Report – Age-Friendly Action Plan

Prepared by:

Cassondra Dillman, Intermediate Planner

Reviewed by:

Scott Taylor, Director of Planning

Lower Tier(s) Affected:

All member municipalities in Grey County

Recommendation
1. That report PDR-CW-11-26 regarding the County’s Age-Friendly Action Plan
progress be received for information; and
2. That staff be authorized to make minor amendments to the County’s AgeFriendly Action Plan, without impacting the intent of the Plan, to enable
plan implementation; and
3. That staff be directed to share the Progress Report with all member
municipalities for information.

Executive Summary
Grey County is advancing its Age-Friendly Community vision to ensure residents of all
ages can live, work, and participate fully in safe and accessible environments. With the
County population aging rapidly, projected to have more than one-third of residents over
65 by 2035, it is important to prioritize planning for inclusive and Age-Friendly housing,
transportation, and community services.
Supported by a 2021 provincial grant, Grey County developed its Age-Friendly
Community Strategy and Action Plan, endorsed in 2022. The Plan outlines over 100
recommended actions based on the World Health Organization’s eight Age-Friendly
community dimensions and relies on collaboration across County departments,
municipalities, and over 20 community partners.
The progress report, linked in the attachment section below, identifies that half of the
action items have been completed, are underway, or are embedded in ongoing County

PDR-CW-11-26

1

March 26, 2026
Page 89 of 114

operations, and items from all eight dimensions have been initiated. A four-page
Progress Snapshot is also linked below to provide a high-level overview.
Staff are recommending minor updates to some action items to streamline actions,
update leads, and better align responsibilities, strengthening the County’s ability to
support residents of all ages and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly
Grey County.

Background and Discussion
An Age-Friendly Community is designed so everyone, including children, youth, adults,
and older residents, can live, work, and play in safe, accessible, and welcoming spaces.
Creating an Age-Friendly community begins by examining all parts of community life,
including land development, transportation, parks, social services through an AgeFriendly lens. Committing to seeing and addressing projects, issues, and policies
through this Age-Friendly lens is how we create Age-Friendly communities.
As Grey County grows and ages, the case for Age-Friendly planning only strengthens.
By 2035, more than 1 in 3 Grey residents will be over 65. By planning for Age-Friendly
housing, transportation, and community services, the County can support older adults to
maintain independence and thrive in their communities, as well as their caregivers and
their families. By focusing on the needs of the most vulnerable, from seniors to young
children, our communities become places where everyone can thrive no matter their
age, ability, or background.

Developing the County’s Age-Friendly Initiative
In 2021, Grey County successfully obtained a $60,000 Inclusive Community Grant, from
the Government of Ontario, to develop an Age-Friendly Community Strategy and Action
Plan. The project was highly collaborative with contributions from a stakeholder
committee, community organizations, member municipalities, County staff and over 700
residents. The completed Action Plan was endorsed by County Council in March 2022
and shared with all member municipalities.
Through this process, two important items emerged: a community vision focused on all
ages and an understanding of the Age-Friendly community building that is already
occurring throughout the County. As a result, the Action Plan emphasizes collaboration,
outlining over 100 recommended actions to address and advance key Age-Friendly
priorities regardless of age.

PDR-CW-11-26

2

March 26, 2026
Page 90 of 114

Action Plan Implementation
Grey County’s Age-Friendly Strategy and Action Plan are built around the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) eight community dimensions, ranging from physical infrastructure
(outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, housing) to soft infrastructure (respect
and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, community and information,
community support and health services, and social participation).
Since 2022, County staff have been working on plan implementation. While
accountability for the Plan lies with Grey County’s Planning department, successful
implementation requires efforts from all County departments and a wide range of
community partners. The Grey County Age-Friendly Communities Committee supports
this work and serves as a cross-sector network sharing resources and fostering
collaboration among those involved in Age-Friendly initiatives across the County.
The Action Plan also recommends regular progress reviews to help identify successes,
address gaps, and guide resources effectively. As Grey County is a two-tier
government, the Action Plan naturally connects and interacts with many existing
municipal services and community initiatives. The Plan provides a framework for AgeFriendly community planning. Building an Age-Friendly community is an iterative
planning process: revisions signal growth and strengthen the community’s Age-Friendly
vision. The detailed Progress Report and Progress Snapshot are linked in the
attachments section below.

What We’ve Learned
The following insights have emerged during the implementation and review of the AgeFriendly Action Plan:
Theme

Summary

Organizational AgeFriendly lens

Many County staff and departments apply an AgeFriendly lens in their daily work, making it part of our
organizational culture.

Broad range of AgeFriendly initiatives
underway

There are many projects and day-to-day activities
across County departments that aid Age-Friendly
community planning goals, some of which are above
and beyond those identified in the Action Plan.

Growing community
engagement and
participation

Community interest in Age-Friendly initiatives
continues to grow.

PDR-CW-11-26

3

March 26, 2026
Page 91 of 114

Local Age-Friendly
leadership

Age-Friendly fairs were hosted by both Grey
Highlands and Blue Mountains this past year. Grey
County was recognized by the province as an AgeFriendly Community in 2026, alongside the Town of
Hanover who has been a provincial leader in AgeFriendly planning since 2017.

The importance of
partnerships

Partnerships are essential for addressing complex
societal issues, such as mental health, addictions,
health care and homelessness. These issues are
beyond the capacity of one organization alone.

The COVID-19
pandemic

The pandemic changed how residents participate,
communicate, and engage with their communities,
while exposing the digital divide, disrupted volunteer
networks, and increased risk of social isolation
among older adults.

Staffing Resources

The absence of a dedicated Age-Friendly
Community Coordinator has added some complexity
to managing the plan and coordinating partners.

Evaluation

Although each action item included performance
indicators and a project lead, much of the data was
not easily available, the indicators did not always
reflect meaningful outcomes, and some identified
leads are no longer suitable.

These insights highlight that Grey County cannot achieve this vision alone. Partnerships
with municipalities, volunteer groups, and not-for-profits are essential to advancing AgeFriendly community planning goals. Grey County’s continued leadership, collaboration,
and commitment to learning will ensure a strong foundation for ongoing progress.

Next Steps
Grey County has made meaningful steps forward in implementing the Age-Friendly
Action Plan and important work remains ahead. The review identified opportunities to
strengthen community partnerships, improve outcome tracking, and identified initiatives
that require additional resources or collaboration.
Moving forward, staff will continue to implement and advance the Action Plan and
support the Age-Friendly Communities Committee. The progress review has also
identified some action items that would benefit from reassessment. Several action items
were identified for consolidation, division, retirement or shifted to a more appropriate
lead. Through this report staff are seeking Council’s support for making minor tweaks to
the Action Plan, without changing the intent of the Plan. The changes would aid in the

PDR-CW-11-26

4

March 26, 2026
Page 92 of 114

implementation of the Plan to streamline actions, update leads, and to better align
responsibilities. For example:
-

-

Action Item 4.5 - regarding the creation of a Grey County Accessibility Group - is
no longer necessary due to continued success of the Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee. The review also identified four duplicate items in the original Plan.
In addition, staff separated nine action items within the report card into smaller,
more specific components to improve clarity and tracking.
The Action Plan assigns a lead and partner organization for each action;
however, many of these leads are no longer suitable because the corresponding
organizations or positions no longer exist.

After four years of working with the Plan, staff have identified these adjustments as
minor but valuable improvements. They will help strengthen implementation, enhance
tracking and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly Grey County.

Financial and Resource Implications
None.

Relevant Consultation
☒
Internal: All County departments were consulted, including Long Term Care,
Transportation Services, Human Resources, Clerks and Legislative Services,
Paramedic Services, Economic Development, Tourism and Culture, Climate Change
Initiatives, Provincial Offences, and Communications
☒
External: Municipal staff and community organizations, including Grey Bruce
Health Unit, Beaver Valley Outreach, Alzheimer Society Grey-Bruce, Grey Bruce Legal
Clinic, Grey Bruce Elder Prevention Network, Osteoporosis Canada, Breaking Down
Barriers, and Regional Geriatric Program of Southwestern Ontario

Appendices and Attachments
Age-Friendly Action Plan Progress Report 2026.pdf
Age-Friendly Progress Snapshot 2026.pdf

PDR-CW-11-26

5

March 26, 2026
Page 93 of 114

Item 4

Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks

Ministère de l’Environnement, de
la Protection de la nature et des Parcs

Environmental Assessment
Modernization Branch

Direction de la modernisation des processus
d'évaluation environnementale

135 St. Clair Avenue West
4th Floor
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

135, avenue St. Clair Ouest
4e étage
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

April 20, 2026
TO:

Stakeholder Distribution List

RE:

Proposed Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) amendments to improve the
comprehensive environmental assessment (EA) process

Today, Ontario introduced the Protecting Ontario’s Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026
(POWER Act) in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. If made, the changes would support a more
efficient comprehensive EA process and make it easier to navigate by removing certain steps
while maintaining strong environmental protections and other consultation opportunities.
The proposed legislation would, if passed, amend the Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) to
make three key changes to the comprehensive EA process:
• Remove the requirement to publish and consult on a Ministry Review
• Remove the opportunity for the public to request a hearing before the Ontario Land
Tribunal (Tribunal) while maintaining the Minister’s authority to refer an application or
matter related to an application to the Tribunal for a hearing and decision on their own
initiative
• Remove the requirement for Cabinet approval of the Minister’s decision, while providing
the Minister discretion to refer an application to Cabinet for a decision
In addition, we also proposed minor updates to improve clarity and flexibility in the EAA.
If the proposed EAA amendments are made, the regulation that sets out deadlines for certain
steps in the comprehensive EA process (Ontario Regulation 616/98 (Deadlines)) would be
adjusted to align with the changes.
The proposal has been posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) for public
comment. More information is available here. Input is being accepted until May 20, 2026.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at EAModernization.MECP@ontario.ca.
Any comments on the proposal can be submitted through the ERO posting via the link above, or
by email to us.

Page 94 of 114

We are committed to keeping you apprised about EA modernization and working with you to build
a strong EA program for Ontario. We value your perspectives on the EA program and look
forward to your further participation. More information on our other efforts to modernize the EA
program can also be found here.
Sincerely,

Annamaria Cross
Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization Branch
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks

Page 2 of 2

Page 95 of 114

Item 5

BY EMAIL

April 17, 2026

TO:

All Municipalities
All Natural Gas Utilities
Frequent Intervenors
Information Session Participants

Re:

2026 Generic Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement
Extension of Intervention Deadline
Ontario Energy Board File Number: EB-2026-0009

The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) wishes to thank all municipalities, gas utilities, and
other interested parties who attended the recent municipal franchise generic proceeding
information session on April 15, 2026. The high level of engagement and thoughtful
questions underscored the importance of this proceeding and the value of broad
participation.
As explained in the Notice of Hearing, municipalities, gas utilities, and other interested
parties who wish to actively participate in this proceeding must apply for intervenor
status and, where applicable, cost eligibility using the OEB’s online Intervention Form.
Following the information session, the OEB noted a common concern that some
municipalities may be unable to meet the pre-established deadline for requesting
intervenor status in this proceeding. In response to this concern, the OEB is extending
the deadline to apply for intervenor status to May 1, 2026.
The OEB also acknowledges comments from various municipalities regarding potential
challenges for active municipal participation in this proceeding due to the upcoming
municipal election cycle. The OEB intends to consider this in designing its procedural
schedule, which will be issued at a later date.
The commissioners assigned to this proceeding are: David Sword (presiding), Robert
Dodds, and James Sidlofsky.

2300 Yonge Street, 27th floor, P.O. Box 2319, Toronto, ON, M4P 1E4

T 416-481-1967

1-888-632-6273

2300, rue Yonge, 27e étage, C.P. 2319, Toronto (Ontario) M4P 1E4

F 416-440-7656

OEB.ca

Page 96 of 114

Ontario Energy Board

-2Should you have any questions regarding this proceeding, please contact Natalya
Plummer at natalya.plummer@oeb.ca.
Yours truly,

Ritchie
Murray

Digitally signed by Ritchie
Murray
Date: 2026.04.17
14:26:16 -04'00'

Ritchie Murray
Registrar

Page 97 of 114

Item 6

April 13, 2026
Hon. Todd J. McCarthy
Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Dear Minister McCarthy,
Upon review of the recent changes to Ontario Conservation Authorities and proposed further
changes that could impact the Clean Water Act and its Regulations, our Source Protection
Committee collaborated on the following response.
Over the last 25 years, protection of municipal drinking water sources in Ontario has improved
dramatically. However, as the landscape and the climate changes, we must remain vigilant and
continue with drinking water source protection measures to ensure that there continues to be safe
water available for public consumption. Recently, the Province announced changes to boundaries
for the regional consolidation of Ontario’s conservation authorities. This reconfiguration must
align with the fundamental basis of Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report
recommendation to maintain watershed-based drinking water source protection at the local level.
As a Source Protection Committee, we strongly advocate that Justice O’Connor’s
recommendations are respected to ensure that source protection planning and implementation
remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches.
The integrity of the drinking water source protection program is local, watershed-based
committees that include members from the agriculture, business/commerce/industry, municipal,
environment and health sectors. These members have a vested interest in the sources and drinking
water systems that supply their families, neighbours and constituents with a safe supply of drinking
water. Dilution of this oversight to the new regional conservation authority scale will not serve the
recommendations made by Justice O’Connor following the tragedy that happened in Walkerton in
our Source Protection Region. Our region and its residents are considerably more familiar and
unwilling to waver on the core principles of the program.
Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report recommended watershed-based drinking water
source protection planning at the local level by those most directly affected. To ensure that source
protection planning and implementation remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches,
and to minimize the need for time consuming administrative changes and conformity exercises,
the province should consider:
• Adopting the current scale of Source Protection Regions as the largest geographic extent for the
proposed regional Conservation Authorities. A single regional Source Protection Authority
spanning numerous municipalities risks weakening local accountability, distancing decisionmaking from watershed-specific realities, and diluting the local focus that is foundational to
effective watershed management.

Page 98 of 114

• Retaining the current geographic scale of Source Protection Areas. Ensuring that Assessment
Reports (ARs) and Source Protection Plans (SPPs) would continue to be reflective of local
drinking water threats, vulnerabilities, and policy approaches. While also helping ensure that
conformity exercises and consequential amendments to ARs and SPPs would be minimized.
Consolidation of ARs and SPPs to reflect changed Source Protection Area boundaries would be
time consuming and contribute little to the outcomes of the source protection program.
• Maintaining local representation on Source Protection Committees (SPCs) to ensure that
municipal, economic, public interest holders, and implementation bodies continue to have a voice
in identifying needed amendments to plans and overseeing progress towards achieving the
objectives of SPPs. Continued alignment of SPCs with Source Protection Region jurisdictions
would help ensure local representation and accountability.
The Source Protection Committee has deep concerns about possible implications to the Clean
Water Act as a result of the recent Conservation Authority Act changes. It is our intent to continue
to work with the province, local municipalities and local Source Protection Authorities to protect
our local sources of drinking water in the spirit of Justice O’Connor’s recommendations.
Sincerely,

Dick Hibma
Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula
Source Protection Committee
Cc via email: Kirsten Service, MECP
Source Protection Authorities
Municipal Clerks

2

Page 99 of 114

Item 7

Monday, April 20, 2026
Premier of Ontario
Hon. Doug Ford
Legislative Building, Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Sent via email: premier@ontario.ca
Re: Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform
At its regular meeting on April 10, 2026, the Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus adopted the following motion in
support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform:

11.d • GlowUp Beauty, anail and eye lash studio located at 968 2nd Avenue West • Good Neighbour Resale, agrocery store for dry...

Ontario introduced the Protecting Ontario’s Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026, proposing amendments to the Environmental Assessment Act to streamline the comprehensive EA process by removing requirements for Ministry Review publication, public hearings before the Ontario Land Tribunal, and Cabinet approval for Ministerial decisions. Concurrently, the Ontario Energy Board extended the deadline for municipalities to apply for intervenor status in a generic proceeding regarding the Model Franchise Agreement to May 1, 2026, acknowledging challenges posed by the upcoming municipal election cycle. Additionally, a Source Protection Committee expressed deep concerns regarding proposed regional consolidation of Conservation Authorities, advocating for the retention of local watershed-based planning to uphold the recommendations of Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report and ensure local accountability for drinking water source protection.

Page 39 of 114

b.

No fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and/or curbside
patio renewals, where there are no changes proposed to the
street furniture or patio layout, and a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and the term of the agreement
has not expired; and

c.

$100 per parking stall per month, up to a maximum of two (2)
parking stalls for a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by the Patio
Permit By-law.

Highlights:











Patios in the municipal right-of-way in the River District are one
way the City encourages a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly
streetscape.
The City’s current Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
are a 2011 document and warrant review to ensure that universal
accessibility, public safety and the streetscape experience are
enhanced and not negatively impacted by the introduction of a
patio within the right-of-way.
Updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were
presented to the City’s Community Services Committee at its
meeting on March 18, 2026, through Staff Report CS-26-013.
City staff consulted with the River District Board of Management,
the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee, and River
District business owners on the updated guidelines.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit Bylaw.
The purpose of this report is to report on the feedback received
from various stakeholders that has been considered in the final bylaw and present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment:
Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development,
planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that
contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents
and tourists.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 2 of 15

Page 40 of 114

Previous Report/Authority:
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines (2011)
Staff Report CS-22-065 – Patio Funding Options
Staff Report CS-23-051 – River District Patios – Ontario Traffic Council
Guidelines for Patios within the Right of Way
Staff Report CS-26-013 – Draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines

Background:
Sidewalk patios are outdoor extensions to existing commercial
establishments that are located on City-owned property, such as the
sidewalk or municipal on-street parking spaces. Street furniture and sidewalk
patios are often located within the City’s River District and Harbour area.
At its meeting on September 15, 2021, Community Services Committee
subsequently adopted on September 27, 2021, through adoption of the
"THAT the Community Services Committee recommends that City
Council direct staff to:
1.

Bring forward a report to a future Community Services
Committee meeting respecting the potential of facilitating
sidewalk patios through the Community Improvement Plan;
and,

2.

Undertake a review of the Street Furniture & Sidewalk Patio
Design Guidelines."

Over the last three months, Planning staff have been working together with
the City’s Development Team including Engineering Services, the Building
Division, Clerks staff, Fire Prevention, and the River District Coordinator to
Services Committee on May 18, 2022.
Updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines were presented to the
Community Services Committee at its meeting on March 18, 2026, through
Staff Report CS-26-013. The Community Services Committee adopted the
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 3 of 15

Page 41 of 114

adopted on April 13, 2026, through adoption of the meeting minutes:
"THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-013 respecting the
draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, the Community
Services Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to:
1.

Consult with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee and River District business owners with previous
patio approvals on the draft guidelines; and

2.

Bring forward a report including input received from
stakeholders and a draft sidewalk patio by-law for
consideration to the April 27, 2026, Regular Council
Meeting."

Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
updated street furniture and sidewalk patio guidelines at its meeting on
March 11, 2026 and the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee
on April 17, 2026. Staff requested feedback from all River District business
owners on the updated guidelines through the River District newsletter on
March 24, 2026.
The guidelines have been transitioned to a final Patio Permit By-law attached
as Schedule ‘A’, with a purpose of:
a.

Encouraging the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants,
cafes, and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street
furniture and amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian
friendly built environment, particularly within the City’s River
District and Harbour Area; and

b.

Ensuring that universal accessibility, public safety, and the
streetscape experience are enhanced and not negatively
impacted by the introduction of a patio within the municipal
right-of-way.

As Council will recall, in Spring of 2022, the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC)
released Restaurant Patio Guidelines that were developed by experts in the
transportation industry and are the best practice for managing restaurant
patios within a road authority’s right-of-way. The proposed Patio Permit Bylaw implements the OTC Guidelines, consistent with the approach of other
municipalities across Ontario.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 4 of 15

Page 42 of 114

The purpose of this report is to outline the feedback received from various
stakeholders that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law and to
present the by-law to City Council for adoption.

Analysis and Options:
This section summarizes the feedback received from various stakeholders
that has been considered in the final Patio Permit By-law:

By-law Format
City Planning staff consulted with the Clerks Division on updated draft Street
Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines on March 3, 2026. Based on the
feedback received, it was recommended that the updated guidelines be
transitioned to a by-law. This approach allows a mechanism for enforcement,
should a patio be placed illegally within the municipal right-of-way, and is
consistent with the approach of other municipalities across Ontario including
the City of Ottawa, the Municipality of Kincardine, and the Township of
Loyalist, which all have their own respective sidewalk patio by-laws.
The Patio Permit By-law is attached as Schedule ‘A’ to this report. In
adopting the Patio Permit By-law, it is necessary to repeal Section 2.18 of
By-law 1989-138, being a By-law to Regulate the Use of and Preservation of
Order on Streets, to remove provisions related to outdoor patios that are in
conflict with the new by-law.
Following adoption of the Patio Permit By-law, Planning staff will work with
Communications staff to create a more visual, user-friendly guide to the bylaw to assist staff and patio operators in the ongoing administration of the
program.

Fines for Non-Compliance
Staff are recommending the use of set fines for non-compliance. Wherever
possible, infractions that can be applied to both the patio operator and the
property owner will be applied to both. It is particularly important that the
patio operator be held accountable as they ultimately own, operate, and
manage the sidewalk patio.
Schedule ‘B’ outlines the proposed infractions and associated set fines. The
maximum set fine that is permitted is $1,000. The set fines in the
attachment do not include the administrative costs that are added onto the
fines (victim surcharge added by the Provincial Offences Court). The
proposed set fines align with similar offences in other regulatory by laws. In
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 5 of 15

Page 43 of 114

addition, the fines need to be high enough so that patio operators don't
consider a fine as the cost of doing business.
Should Council approve the proposed set fines, staff will apply to the Ministry
of the Attorney General for final approval. It is worth noting that tickets can
be issued each day that there is a contravention of the by-law, and this
would be communicated to the owner as part of the application process.
As with many other by-laws, circumstances in which staff would lay fines
would be rare and used as a last resort. Staff would first work cooperatively
with the patio operator to achieve compliance with the by-law.

Roadside Barriers
As described in Staff Report CS-26-013, the Patio Permit By-law implements
the Ontario Traffic Council (OTC) Restaurant Patio Guidelines released in
Spring of 2022 for patios located within the right-of-way, particularly as it
relates to the use of roadside barriers for Curb Lane Patios located within an
on-street parking space or a curb lane.
The Patio Permit By-law permits a Curb Lane Patio within a maximum of two
(2) on-street parking spaces or a curb lane only on roadways with:




A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.
No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).
On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

The City’s roadways of 2nd Avenue East, 3rd Avenue East, 8th Street East, and
9th Street East would meet these requirements.
Based on these road characteristics, the OTC Guidelines require the
installation of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware) tested
barriers to be installed within the road allowance to mitigate the risk of an
errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons seated at
tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.
Comments received from the City’s Director of Public Works and
Engineering, as it relates to roadside barriers are as follows:
The OTC specifies that a minimum of TL-1 rated barriers be employed
in this scenario, however some barriers require specific setbacks to
accommodate deflection from impacts, even at relatively low speeds
such as 50 km/h. This is a critical factor; barricades work to keep
vehicles on the road by absorbing the force of impact, typically at an
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 6 of 15

Page 44 of 114

oblique angle (i.e. a glancing blow). Some absorb it by being able to
withstand the impact, usually through sheer force of gravity
(weight/mass); an example of this is the concrete jersey barrier.
Others absorb the force by cradling the vehicle and deflecting it back
onto the road. This type of barrier is meant to stretch or push
backwards and angle the vehicle back into a straight trajectory. This
principle is most commonly seen in the post and steel cable or steel wbeam guiderails on highways. These barriers, due to their designed
deflection, require varying depths of setbacks to be able to function
properly. Anything or anyone caught within this deflection zone is in
extreme danger should the barrier be struck.
For this reason, the best and recommended choice in this case is the
concrete jersey barrier style, having the least horizontal displacement,
and therefore a minimal setback zone. Although the minimum clear
zone required behind a particular type of barrier varies from product to
product, in general, water or sand-filled jersey barriers would be next
best, as they have a relatively small required clear zone at 0.5 m.
However, these also require regular patrols to ensure they remain
adequately filled. For comparison, ‘Urban Barrier’ has the largest
displacement distance, at approximately 2 metres, even at 50 km/h.
An added benefit of using the concrete jersey barrier is that it is the
most readily available style in this area. At the end of the day, any
MASH rated barrier is acceptable, but any barrier used must be
installed according to manufacturer’s specifications. Notably, any
clear/buffer zone required between the barrier and the patio must be
observed.
A requirement that roadside barriers be installed according to manufacturer’s
specifications has been included in the Patio Permit By-law, consistent with
comments received from the Director of Public Works and Engineering.
Examples of TL-1, TL-2, and TL-3 roadside barriers that would meet or
exceed the requirements of the OTC Guidelines, and the associated cost of
rental, are attached as Schedule ‘C’. The supply, installation, and removal of
roadside barriers within the City’s road allowance will be required to be at
the expense of the patio operator. A user pay system is consistent with the
approach of other municipalities in Ontario, including the Municipality of
Meaford (see Staff Report DEV2025-29). As demonstrated in Schedule ‘C’,
costs associated with roadside barrier rental are expected to be between
$2,100 and $2,500 for a six (6) month season (May 1 to October 31), based
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 7 of 15

Page 45 of 114

on a Curb Lane Patio located within one (1) on-street parking space, and
depending on the type of barrier selected by the operator.
Comments from the Community Services Committee were also received that
question whether the OTC Restaurant Patio Guidelines are voluntary versus
mandatory and noted concerns with the appearance of the roadside barriers
within the downtown.
Traditionally, the City has permitted patios within on-street parking spaces
with the installation of two (2) curb stops and planter boxes provided at
either end of the patio. Based on OTC guidance, this type of patio delineation
is not sufficient for providing any level of protection for restaurant patrons or
staff against an errant vehicle. Ultimately, staff cannot recommend that
patios be permitted within on-street parking without the installation of
proper barricades, in the interest of maintaining public health and safety.
While compliance with the OTC Guidelines is not provincially
legislated, it is consistent with the advice of the City’s insurer and is
the practice followed widely by other municipalities in Ontario.
As it relates to the appearance of roadside barriers, the Patio Permit By-law
would permit a patio operator to utilize hanging plant materials to buffer the
appearance of the barrier, though this would not be a mandatory
requirement.

Temporary Encroachment Permit
The Patio Permit By-law clarifies that the provisions of the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law do not apply to street furniture and sidewalk patios,
where a patio permit has been obtained and a patio agreement has been
executed with the City.
A temporary road closure in accordance with the Ontario Traffic Manual Book
7 will be required for Curb Lane Patios to facilitate installation and removal of
the required roadside barriers. A Temporary Traffic Control Plan is required
to be submitted as part of a complete patio permit application for a Curb
Lane Patio, and the City’s Engineering Services Division will provide review
and comment through this process. A separate temporary encroachment
permit and fee is not required.
Standard conditions of the City’s Temporary Encroachment Permit, where
applicable, will be incorporated into the City’s patio agreement, in
accordance with comments received from the City’s Engineering Services
Division.
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 8 of 15

Page 46 of 114

Streamlining
In consulting with the City’s River District Coordinator, Planning staff have
identified an opportunity to streamline the application approval process for
the placement of street furniture and sidewalk patios within the right-of-way.
Specifically, the proposed Patio Permit By-law provides a process for patio
permit renewals, where there is no change in layout and a patio agreement
with the City is in effect.
An application for a patio permit renewal is limited to the following:
1.

Proof of liability insurance in the amount of $5,000,000,
indemnifying the City as an additional insured.

2.

A copy of the patio operator’s liquor licence, if applicable.

3.

For a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers.

As discussed in the Fees and Charges section of this report, Planning staff
are also recommending a reduced fee for street furniture, frontage patio, and
curbside patio renewals.

Delegation and Appeals Process
In 2021, City Council delegated approval authority for sidewalk patios to the
City Manager, in consultation with the Director of Community Services,
Director of Public Works and Engineering, and the Manager of Planning and
Heritage, and subject to AGCO approval for a licenced patio in accordance
with the provisions established in the Province’s Stage 2 re-opening
guidelines applicable at the time, including:






Design, layout, and placement.
Execution of agreement.
Provision of correspondence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission
of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no objection to extension of liquor
licences.
Waive all fees.

Comments from the Community Services Committee questioned whether the
City Manager is the appropriate delegate for sidewalk patios. Staff note that
the delegation and certain limits thereof, were put in place during the
COVID-19 pandemic, to provide staff flexibility in responding to a rapidly
changing emergency situation.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 9 of 15

Page 47 of 114

Certain aspects of the delegation warrant review in the context of the
updated Patio Permit By-law, however, staff delegated approval for sidewalk
patios has generally worked well and resulted in improved customer service
to patio operators. With delegation, staff were generally able to issue patio
approvals within seven to ten business days.
The Patio Permit By-law proposes that the authority to issue patio permits
and renewals, with or without conditions, and refuse to issue or renew a
patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio permit, be delegated to the
Director of Community Services and the Director of Public Works and
Engineering, or their designates, acting jointly.
The delegation of patio permits and renewals to senior management
continues to ensure a streamlined approvals process that patio operators are
accustomed to. Having both the Director of Community Services and the
Director of Public Works and Engineering serve as the delegates ensures that
input from both Planning and Engineering is considered in the approvals
process.
The authority to execute patio agreements and provide correspondence to
the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), indicating no
objection to the extension of liquor licences for a licenced patio are also
proposed to remain delegated to staff and conferred to the Director of
Community Services and the Director of Public Works and Engineering, as
these are administrative functions necessary for ensuring implementation of
the Patio Permit By-law. The authority to waive patio fees and reference to
the Province’s Stage 2 reopening under the limits of the current delegation
will be removed as part of the recommended update to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law, as these are no longer relevant.
Staff note that there are limited circumstances in which a patio permit or
renewal would be refused, suspended or revoked, as set out in Section 29 of
the by-law, however, in the interest of maintaining procedural fairness, the
by-law establishes an appeals process for patio permit refusals or revocation
that would be considered by the City Manager.

Fees and Charges
In May of 2022, the Community Services Committee considered Staff Report
CS-22-065, respecting Patio Funding Options, and recommended that City
Council direct staff to bring forward an amendment to the City’s Fees and
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 10 of 15

Page 48 of 114

The City’s current fees for street furniture and sidewalk patios are as follows:
Patio Type

Current Fee

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
amenity strip

$50 per business, per year

Street furniture/sidewalk patio –
parking stalls

$200 for the first two (2) parking
stalls, $100 per each additional stall.

The current fee structure warrants an update to, among other matters, align
the fees with the new patio definitions provided under the Patio Permit Bylaw. The fees proposed by staff are as follows:
Patio Type

Proposed Fee

First-year street furniture, frontage
patio, or curbside patio, as defined
by the Patio Permit By-law

$50 per business

Street furniture, frontage patio, or
curbside patio renewals

No fee where the following
conditions are met:
a. No change to the street
furniture or frontage patio
and/or curbside patio layout is
proposed.
b. A patio agreement has been
executed with the City and the
term of such agreement has
not expired.
For clarity, if either of the above
noted conditions are not satisfied,
the $50 first-year application fee
would apply.

Curb Lane Patio (new or renewal)

$100 per parking stall per month,
maximum two (2) parking stalls.

The intent of the revised street furniture and sidewalk patio fees
recommended through Staff Report CS-22-065, was to ensure that street
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 11 of 15

Page 49 of 114

furniture and patios proposed within the limits of the sidewalk (i.e., at the
building face or curbside) were attainable for businesses, particularly those
not centered around food service. The updated fee structure proposed by
staff maintains this intent and, subject to conditions, provides a reduced fee
for street furniture, frontage patio, and curbside patio renewals, to further
encourage this type of patio within the downtown to activate the streetscape.
Fees for Curb Lane Patios are proposed to be increased to $100 per parking
stall per month, to align with the City’s existing fee to rent an on-street
parking space ($50 per week). Parking stalls are capped at a maximum of
two (2), to align with the definition of a Curb Lane Patio provided by the
Patio Permit By-law. A greater fee for Curb Lane Patios is appropriate, given
the larger size/scale that results in additional review and monitoring by City
staff.

Insurance
The Patio Permit By-law continues to require that patio operators carry and
provide proof of liability insurance for the operation of the street furniture or
patio, indemnifying the City as the owner of the public lands on which the
patio or street furniture is situated. The amount of liability insurance required
has been increased from $2,000,000, to $5,000,000, consistent with
comments received from the City’s insurer, the Purchasing and Claims
Coordinator, and the Engineering Services Division.

Accessibility
As outlined in Staff Report CS-26-013, patio operators are required to
provide a patio layout that maintains a sufficient accessible route on the
sidewalk for pedestrians. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act
(AODA) requires the width of the accessible route to be a minimum of 1.5
metres. The OTC Guidelines for Restaurant Patios and other municipalities
with updated guidelines (e.g., City of Guelph, City of Kingston), require the
accessible route to be 1.8 metres.
Planning staff consulted with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee on the desired width of the accessible route at its meeting on
April 17, 2026. Based on this consultation, the Patio Permit By-law requires a
patio operator to design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient accessible route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width, as follows:

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 12 of 15

Page 50 of 114

a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street
East: 1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue
East: 1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres.

The intent of the by-law is to require that a greater accessible route be
provided where the width of the right-of-way is larger.

Resource Alignment:
Financial Resources
There are no anticipated impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the Patio
Permit By-law.
It is recommended that staff be directed to update the City’s existing fees
and charges for patios to, among other matters, align with the patio
definitions provided under the new by-law.
Fees generated from street furniture and sidewalk patios are generally low,
as the City receives a low number of applications each year.

Human Resources
Processing of patio applications will be completed within the existing
operating budget. The Planning & Heritage Division administers the program
on an annual basis, with input from the City’s Development Team, including
Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire.
It is recommended that approval authority for patios continue to be
delegated to staff. Amendments are recommended to the Delegation of
Powers and Duties By-law to delegate approval authority for patios and the
execution of patio agreements to the Director of Community Services and
the Director of Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly.
Processing timelines for patio applications is dependent on the size and
location of a proposed patio, however, with an updated by-law, it is expected
that application review timelines will be reduced. The by-law also provides a
more streamlined approach for street furniture and patio renewals.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 13 of 15

Page 51 of 114

Time and Scheduling
The updated Patio Permit By-law has been completed as part of the Planning
& Heritage Division’s 2026 Work Plan.

Technology and Infrastructure
The City’s Cloudpermit system will be used to manage patio applications
beginning in 2027 and on a go forward basis.

Climate and Environmental Impacts:
There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts.

Communication and Engagement:
The draft Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines were circulated to
the City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, Engineering
Services, Environmental Services, and Clerks staff, as well as the City’s River
District Coordinator, Communications staff, City Fire Prevention Services.
and Police Services for review and comment on February 10, 2026.
An internal staff meeting to discuss the draft guidelines and obtain feedback
was held on February 19, 2026.
Planning staff consulted with the River District Board of Management on the
draft guideline at its meeting on March 11, 2026, the Community Services
Committee on March 18, 2026, and the Grey County Joint Accessibility
Advisory Committee on April 17, 2026.
Feedback on the updated Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patio Guidelines was
requested from all River District Business owners on March 24, 2026 through
the River District newsletter.
The Patio Permit By-law was developed in consultation with the City’s
Manager of Legislative Services and By-law Enforcement.
Feedback received from the various stakeholders is outlined in the Analysis
section of this report and has been incorporated into the final by-law.

Report Developed in Consultation With:
In updating the draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, staff consulted the following
documents:
Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 14 of 15

Page 52 of 114











Ontario Traffic Council Restaurant Patio Guidelines within the Right
of Way (April 2022)
City of Guelph Seasonal Patio Program Guidelines
City of Kingston Street Patio Standards and Application Guide
Municipality of Meaford Corporate Policy – Commercial Patio on
Municipal Lands
Prince Edward County Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
City of London Sidewalk Patio Guidelines
Municipality of Kincardine By-law No. 2021-069, being a by-law to
regulation seasonal on-street patios.
City of Ottawa Right of Way Patio By-law No. 2023-230
Loyalist Township Patio Licence By-law 2012-025

Attachments:
Schedule ‘A’ – Patio Permit By-law
Schedule ‘B’ – Set Fines and Short Form Wording
Schedule ‘C’ – Roadside Barriers
Reviewed by:
Sabine Robart, Manager of Planning & Heritage
Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services
Submission approved by:
Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services (Acting City Manager)
For more information on this report, please contact Jacklyn Iezzi, Senior
Planner at planning@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1261.

Staff Report CS-26-031: Patio Permit By-law
Page 15 of 15

Page 53 of 114

By-law No. 2026-XXX

Patio Permit By-law
Table of Contents

Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope .............................................. 1
Part II. Interpretation ....................................................................... 2
Schedules ......................................................................................... 2
Part III. Administration .................................................................... 3
Delegation ........................................................................................ 3
Part IV. Permit Required ................................................................... 4
Permit required ................................................................................. 4
Part V. Application for Permit ............................................................ 4
Submitting an application ................................................................... 4
Issuing licences ................................................................................. 6
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation .......................................... 6
Grounds ........................................................................................... 6
Notice .............................................................................................. 7
Danger to health or safety .................................................................. 8
Appeals ............................................................................................ 8
Part VII. Operation Requirements ..................................................... 8
Timing .............................................................................................. 8
Responsibilities .................................................................................. 8
General Prohibitions ........................................................................... 9
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice ....................................... 10
Inspections ..................................................................................... 10
Obstruction ..................................................................................... 10
Orders ............................................................................................ 10
Notice ............................................................................................ 11
Part IX. Offence and Penalty ........................................................... 11
Part X. Effective Date ...................................................................... 12

Page 54 of 114

Consolidated Version
Last revised on XXX
Revision History:

Passed On:

2026-XXX (original)

Description of
amendment
-

Consolidated for Convenience Only
This is a consolidation copy of a City of Owen Sound By-law for convenience
and information. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this
by-law, it is not an official version or a legal document. The original by-law
should be consulted for all interpretations and applications on this subject.
For more information or to view by-laws please contact the Clerks
Department.

Page 55 of 114

The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound
By-law No. 2026-XXX
A By-law to licence, regulate and govern
the construction, erection and operation of
Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patios on Public Lands
WHEREAS subsection 5(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, c. 25 (the
“Municipal Act”) provides that a municipal power shall be exercised by by-law;
and
WHEREAS subsection 11(2) of the Municipal Act authorizes the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Owen Sound (the “City”) to pass by-laws with respect
to the public assets of the Town, for the economic, social and environmental
well-being of the Town, and for the health, safety and well-being of persons; and
WHEREAS section 11(3) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to pass bylaws respecting the following spheres of jurisdiction: highways, structures,
parking and business licensing;
WHEREAS sections 23.1 to 23.6 of the Municipal Act authorize City Council to
delegate its powers and duties under the Municipal Act or any other Act to a
person or body, subject to the restrictions set out in the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS it is the opinion of City Council that the powers and duties being
delegated in this by-law are of a minor nature, in accordance with sections
23.2(4) and 23.2(5) of the Municipal Act; and
WHEREAS section 151(1) of the Municipal Act authorizes City Council to provide
for a system of licences with respect to a business; and
bring forward the subject by-law for approval, in consideration of staff report CS26-031;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OWEN
SOUND HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Part I. Short Title, Purpose and Scope
Short Title
1.

The by-law may be referred to as the “Patio Permit By-law” and, when so
referenced, includes all future amendments, unless otherwise specified.

Purpose
2.

This by-law has been enacted to:
a.

encourage the accommodation of uses, such as restaurants, cafes,
and entertainment facilities, and the provision of street furniture and
amenities, that create an attractive, pedestrian friendly builtenvironment, particularly within the City’s River District and Harbour
area; and

b.

ensure that universal accessibility, public safety, and the streetscape
experience are enhanced and not negatively impacted by the
introduction of a patio on public lands.
Page 56 of 114

PAGE 2

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Scope
3.

This by-law applies to the City of Owen Sound in its entirety. However, for
clarity, patios are only permitted where the City’s Zoning By-law would
permit a commercial use and where there is an area on adjacent public
lands that can meet the requirements of this by-law.
Part II. Interpretation

Headings
4.

The division of this by-law into parts and the insertion of headings are for
convenient reference only and do not affect the interpretation of the bylaw.

Gender and Number
5.

In this by-law, unless the contrary intention is indicated, words used in the
singular include the plural and words imparting a gender include all
genders, where applicable.

References to Applicable Law
6.

All references to applicable law are ambulatory and apply as amended,
extended or re-enacted from time to time.

Schedules
7.

Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements is attached to and forms part of this
by-law.

Severability
8.

In the event any provisions of this by-law are deemed invalid or void, in
whole or in part, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

Definitions
9.

For the purposes of this by-law:
“Accessible Route(s)” means a continuous, unobstructed path connecting
accessible elements and spaces;
“Cane Detectable” means leading edges that are within a cane sweep area;
“City” means the City of Owen Sound and a reference to the City is a
reference to the geographical area or to The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound as the context requires;
“City Manager” means the City Manager of The Corporation of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Contiguous to frontage” means the patio space is located directly in front
of or adjacent to the building that houses the business for which the patio
application was approved;
“Curbside Patio” means a patio located on the exterior edge of the
sidewalk, adjacent to the curb, with an Accessible Route located between
the building and the patio;
“Curb Lane Patio” means a patio located within a maximum of two (2) onstreet parking spaces;
Page 57 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

“Director” means the Director of Community Services and Director of
Public Works and Engineering, acting jointly, and includes their designates;
“Frontage Patio” means a patio located immediately adjacent to the
building but extending beyond the front property line onto public lands;
“Patio” means a seasonal structure or installation of street furniture on
public lands for commercial use and includes:
a.

A Frontage Patio;

b.

A Curbside Patio; and,

c.

A Curb Lane Patio;

“Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership or association, and
their heirs, executors, assignees and administrators;
“Permit” means a permit for a patio issued under this by-law and may be
referred to as a Patio Permit;
“Public lands” means any property under the care and control of the City of
Owen Sound;
“Officer” means any person authorized by the City to enforce by-laws and
includes a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer appointed to enforce the bylaws of the City or a police officer while in the course of their duties;
“Operator” means the person or business applying for a permit or renewal
of a permit under this by-law;
“Owner” means the person(s) on title as the owner(s) of a building or
parcel of land identified on a parcel register from the Land Registry Office;
“Street Furniture” means those objects and pieces of equipment that work
to enrich the utility and aesthetic value of the street and includes, but is
not limited to, benches, flowerpots, retail or merchandise tables, and patio
furniture; and
“Tactile Tape” means a textured, adhesive strip applied to the surface of
the sidewalk and perimeter of a Patio that is yellow or white in colour, to
provide touch-based guidance or warning cues, especially for people with
visual impairments.
Part III. Administration
Delegation
10.

The administration of this by-law is assigned to the Director who will
generally perform the administrative functions conferred upon them by this
by-law, and without limitation may:
a.

delegate any responsibilities to an employee of the City, conferred to
the Director under this by-law;

b.

receive and process all applications for patio permits and renewals of
patio permits under this by-law;

c.

issue patio permits and renew patio permits in accordance with the
provisions of this by-law;

Page 58 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

impose conditions on patio permits at the time of issuance, renewal
or any other time during the patio season, in accordance with this
by-law and as necessary to give effect to this by-law;

e.

execute patio agreements between operators and the City required
in fulfillment of a condition of a patio permit or renewal, in
accordance with this by-law; and

f.

refuse to issue or renew a patio permit, or revoke or suspend a patio
permit, in accordance with this by-law.
Part IV. Permit Required

Permit required
11.

No person shall construct, erect or operate a patio, or cause a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated, or authorize a patio to be constructed,
erected, or operated, without first obtaining a permit in accordance with
the provisions of this by-law.
Part V. Application for Permit

Submitting an application
12.

The Director will receive, process, and review all applications for patio
permits and renewals under this by-law.

13.

No Operator is entitled to apply for a permit or to renew a permit if in the
year prior to the application, the Operator had their permit revoked by the
Director.

14.

Between January 1 and April 1 of each year, an Operator shall file an
application for a patio permit in such form and detail as the Director may
prescribe from time to time, which application shall include, at the
Operator’s cost, the following:
a.

A completed application form that includes the name, telephone
number, and email address of the Operator and owner, if not the
same person, along with the address of the proposed patio.

b.

A detailed site plan and elevation drawings, which may be a hand
drawn sketch, submitted in .jpeg or .pdf format provided it is fully
dimensioned, showing:

c.

i.

the location and dimensions of the proposed patio;

ii.

the premises to which the patio will be appurtenant;

iii.

the location of all relevant lot lines; and

iv.

all existing surface features located between the premises and
the roadway.

A description of the proposed patio and of all materials to be used in
the construction and operation of the patio, including all
appurtenances such as:
i.

canopies, umbrellas, and/or awnings;

ii.

platforms;

iii.

railings and/or fencing;

iv.

any proposed landscaping, such as ground or hanging planter
boxes;
Page 59 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

v.

lighting;

vi.

signage;

vii.

waste storage;

viii.

heaters;

ix.

furniture, including, without limitation, tables, chairs, picnic
tables or benches, and including the proposed material and
colour of such furniture; and

x.

roadside barriers where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed;

d.

photos of the proposed patio location and existing streetscape;

e.

a copy of the Operator’s business licence;

f.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable;

g.

where a Curb Lane Patio is proposed, a Traffic Control Plan for the
installation and removal of roadside barriers in accordance with
Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7; and

h.

any other information required by the Director to approve the
application and determine compliance with this by-law.

15.

Where a patio permit is approved by the Director, the Operator shall enter
into a patio agreement with the City, which may specify conditions for setup and operation of the patio, among other matters. The term of the patio
agreement shall be a minimum of one (1) year and may be up to a
maximum of five (5) years, at the sole discretion of the Director.

16.

The Operator shall provide evidence of insurance, satisfactory to the
Director and in accordance with the provisions of subsection 37.b. of this
by-law, prior to the issuance of a patio permit.

17.

An Operator shall apply for a patio permit for each season that the
applicant wishes to place a patio within the municipal right-of-way.

18.

Notwithstanding section 17 above, the Director will consider approval of
patio permit renewals, where there is no proposed change to the patio
layout, including any appurtenances thereto, iand a patio agreement has
been executed with the City and remains in force and effect.

19.

A patio permit that is not renewed prior to the end date specified in the
patio agreement with the City is no longer valid and requires a new
application.

20.

An application for a patio permit renewal pursuant to section 18 of this bylaw shall be submitted between January 1 and April 1 of each year, and
accompanied by the following, at the Operator’s cost:

21.

a.

proof of insurance, satisfactory to the Director and in accordance
with the provisions of subsection 37(b) of this by-law;

b.

a copy of the Operator’s liquor licence, if applicable; and

c.

for a Curb Lane Patio, a Traffic Control Plan for the installation and
removal of roadside barriers in accordance with Ontario Traffic
Manual Book 7.

Upon submission of a complete patio permit application or renewal by the
Operator, as the case may be, the Director will calculate the required fees
based on the patio type and provide an invoice to the Operator. The
Page 60 of 114

PAGE 6

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Operator shall pay the fees owing in full by April 15 of each year
otherwise, the patio permit will be refused.
22.

The application fee is non-refundable regardless of whether or not the
Director approves a permit and regardless of whether or not the Director
imposes any conditions on the permit.

23.

Patio permit applications and renewals are required to be submitted via the
City’s online permitting system in effect at the time of the application or
renewal.

24.

The Director shall request comments from the City’s Development Team,
including Planning, Building, and Engineering Services staff, as well as City
Fire Prevention and Police Services, prior to making a determination on a
new patio application or renewal, as the case may be.

25.

The City’s Development Team, including Planning, Building, and
Engineering Services staff, as well as City Fire Prevention and Police
Services are responsible for reviewing applications and providing feedback
on any revisions required prior to approval. To determine approval, City
staff will evaluate an application based on:

26.

a.

compliance with the requirements of this by-law;

b.

suitability of the location and any impacts on existing services;

c.

accessibility of the patio and surrounding area;.

d.

safety of the patio set-up, location, and materials; and

e.

design quality and functionality of the patio layout.

The submission of an application for a permit, including the related fee(s)
does not entitle an Operator to construct, erect, or operate a patio. The
Operator is only entitled to construct, erect, and operate a patio once the
permit has been issued under the provisions of this by-law, including the
execution of a patio agreement pursuant to section 15, and a satisfactory
inspection by the City’s Building Division in accordance with section 37.d.

Issuing licences
27.

When an application for a patio or renewal is made in accordance with Part
V of this by-law and the Operator meets all the requirements of this bylaw, the Director will issue a permit.

28.

The permit may include one or more conditions to be fulfilled by the
Operator, at the discretion of the Director.
Part VI. Refusal, Suspension, Revocation

Grounds
29.

The Director may refuse to issue or renew or may suspend or revoke a
patio permit where:
a.

the Operator has failed to pay the required fees, pursuant to section
21 of this by-law;

b.

an application or other document provided to the Director by an
Operator contains a false statement or false information;

c.

the Operator’s existing permit has been suspended or revoked
pursuant to this by-law;

Page 61 of 114

PAGE 7

30.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

d.

the Operator is indebted to the City in respect of fines, penalties,
judgements, outstanding property taxes, or any other amounts
owing;

e.

the Operator, or the property to which the patio is accessory, is
subject to an order, or orders made pursuant to applicable law,
including but not limited to a City by-law, the Building Code Act, the
Fire Protection and Prevention Act, and the Health Protection and
Promotion Act;

f.

the Operator does not comply with any of the requirements of:
i.

this by-law and all other applicable City laws or by-laws
including, but not limited to, the City’s Noise Bylaw,
Encroachment By-law, Zoning By-law, Property Standards Bylaw, and Waste Management By-law;

ii.

the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, as applicable;
or

iii.

any other federal or provincial laws affecting the operation of
the patio;

g.

the Operator has three (3) or more contraventions of City laws or
by-laws within a six-month period or four (4) or more contraventions
of City laws or by-laws within a calendar year;

h.

the permit was issued in error or granted based on incorrect or false
information; or

i.

the Director becomes aware of a fact or facts that, if known at the
time of the application, may have resulted in the Director refusing to
issue the permit.

Where the Operator’s insurance policy expires, is cancelled, or is otherwise
terminated, the applicable patio permit and patio agreement are
automatically suspended effective on the date of such expiration,
cancellation or termination and remain suspended until such insurance has
been reinstated.

Notice
31.

Where the Director refuses to issue or renew a patio permit or where the
Director elects to suspend or revoke a permit:
a.

the Director will send written notice advising the Operator of the
refusal, suspension or revocation of the permit;

b.

the written notice will be sent in accordance with the notice
provisions set out in section 50 of this by-law;

c.

the written notice will:
i.

set out the grounds for the refusal, suspension or revocation;

ii.

be signed;

iii.

indicate the final date and time by which the applicant or
licensee may appeal the decision of the Director and the
method for doing so; and

iv.

indicate the appeals fee, as set out in the City’s Fees and
Charges By-law.

Page 62 of 114

PAGE 8

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Danger to health or safety
32.

Notwithstanding section 31 above, the Director, if satisfied that the
continuation of a permit poses a danger to the health or safety of any
person, may for the time and on such conditions as are considered
appropriate, suspend a permit for not more than fourteen (14) days
without a hearing. If, after the suspension period has elapsed, the Director
is satisfied that the continuation of a permit will continue to pose a danger
to the health or safety of any person, they may further suspend for not
more than fourteen (14) days or revoke the permit.

Appeals
33.

An Operator who has been refused a permit in accordance with section 29
may appeal the refusal to the City Manager by submitting a request for
review to the office of the City Manager within fourteen (14) days of the
refusal.

34.

Where a permit is refused, the Director will advise the applicant of the
appeal option and provide further information on the process in effect at
the time of the refusal.

35.

The decision of the City Manager issued under this by-law is final.
Part VII. Operation Requirements

Timing
36.

No person may construct, erect or operate a patio or allow a patio to be
constructed, erected or operated between November 1 of any year and
April 30 of the following year.

Responsibilities
37.

Every Operator shall:
a.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in compliance with
applicable laws, including but not limited to:
i.

the Health Protection and Promotion Act;

ii.

the Fire Protection and Prevention Act;

iii.

the Building Code Act;

iv.

the Liquor Licence and Control Act;

v.

the Cannabis Control Act;

vi.

the Smoke Free Ontario Act;

vii.

the City’s:
1. Fireworks By-law;
2. Noise By-law;
3. Nuisance By-law;
4. Property Standards By-law;
5. Snow Removal By-law;
6. Unauthorized Parking By-law;
7. Waste Management By-law; and
8. Zoning By-law;
Page 63 of 114

PAGE 9

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

b.

carry a minimum of five-million dollars ($5,000,000) liability
insurance for the operation of their patio, indemnifying the City as
the owner of the public lands on which the patio is situated;

c.

construct, erect and operate their patio in accordance with the
associated patio agreement, where executed with the City;

d.

obtain a satisfactory inspection from the Chief Building Official
following patio installation, and prior to commencing operation;

e.

keep their patio clean and in good repair at all times with ongoing
and proactive maintenance;

f.

return the public lands on which thier patio is placed to its original
condition after the season. All patio objects including, but not limited
to, platforms, fencing, roadside barriers, and furniture, must be
removed from public lands at the end of the season and stored
elsewhere;

g.

construct, erect, and operate their patio in a manner that is
contiguous to the business’ frontage; and

h.

clean and maintain the public land under and directly adjacent to
their patio, including, without limitation, the sidewalk, roadway, and
gutter that may be inaccessible to City equipment due to the patios’s
location.

38.

Notwithstanding subsection 37(a) of this by-law, the City’s Temporary
Encroachment By-law does not apply to a patio, so long as the
requirements of this by-law are met, including that a patio agreement has
been executed with the City.

39.

Where, at any time, there is a change in, or relating to, any of the
information or documents required to be filed with an application under
this by-law, every Operator must report the change in writing to the
Director no later than fifteen (15) days following the change. Examples of
information that may change include:
a.

contact information;

b.

patio layout or configuration;

c.

fire safety measures; or

d.

insurance.

General Prohibitions
40.

41.

No Operator or Owner may construct, erect, or operate, or permit the
construction, erection, or operation of a patio:
a.

without a valid patio permit issued under this by-law;

b.

without a patio agreement executed with the City;

c.

while their patio permit is under suspension or revoked;

d.

except in accordance with the regulations of this by-law, including
Schedule ‘A’ – Design Requirements; and

e.

except in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable
patio permit and patio agreement, as the case may be.

No Operator may:

Page 64 of 114

PAGE 10

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

a.

transfer or assign a patio permit, without the express consent of the
Director;

b.

alter a patio’s design or layout contrary to the conditions of the patio
permit or patio agreement; or

c.

obtain a patio permit by providing false or incorrect information.
Part VIII. Inspections, Orders and Notice

Inspections
42.

The Director or an officer may at any reasonable time enter upon and
inspect the land of any person to ensure that the provisions of this by-law
are complied with.

43.

For the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this by-law, an
officer may:

44.

a.

require the production for inspection of documents or things relevant
to the inspection;

b.

inspect and remove documents or things relevant to the inspection
for the purpose of making copies or extracts;

c.

require information from any person concerning a matter related to
the inspection; and

d.

alone, or in conjunction with a person possessing special or expert
knowledge, make examinations or take tests, samples or
photographs necessary for the purpose of inspection.

The Director or an officer will provide a receipt for any document or thing
removed under subsection 43(b) and the document or thing will be
promptly returned after the copies or extracts are made.

Obstruction
45.

No person shall prevent, hinder, or obstruct, or attempt to prevent, hinder
or obstruct anyone who is lawfully exercising a power or performing a duty
under this by-law.

46.

Any person who has been alleged to have contravened any of the
provisions of this by-law must identify themselves to the Director or officer
upon request. Failure to do so will result in the person being deemed to
have obstructed or hindered the Director or officer in the execution of their
duties.

Orders
47.

An officer may make an order requiring the person who contravened this
by-law, or who caused or permitted the contravention, or the owner or
occupier of the land on which the contravention occurred, to discontinue
the contravening activity or to do work to correct the contravention.

48.

An order made pursuant to section 47 must:
a.

include the reasonable particulars of the contravention adequate to
identify the contravention and the location of the land on which the
contravention occurred;

b.

include the date by which there must be compliance with the order
and/or the work to be done and the date by which the work must be
done;
Page 65 of 114

PAGE 11
c.

49.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

direct that if the thing or matter that is required to be done is not
completed by the time set out in subsection 48(b), the matter or
thing will be done by the City at the person’s expense and the City
may recover the costs of doing the matter or thing from the person
directed or required to do it by action or by adding the costs to the
tax roll and collecting them in the same manner as property taxes.

Every person must comply with an order made pursuant to section 47.

Notice
50.

51.

Any notice or order issued pursuant to this by-law may be given in writing
in any of the following ways and is effective:
a.

on the date on which a copy is delivered to the person to whom it is
addressed;

b.

on the fifth day after a copy is sent by mail to the person’s last
known address;

c.

upon the sending of a copy by e-mail transmission to the person’s
last know email address; or

d.

posting on the premises, on the date of posting.

For the purpose of section 50, a person’s last known address and last
known email address are deemed to include information on the last revised
assessment roll and on an application submitted pursuant to this by-law.
Part IX. Offence and Penalty

52.

Every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law, or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, is guilty of an offence
and liable to a fine of:
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
53.

Where a corporation contravenes any provision of this by-law or fails to
comply with an order issued pursuant to this by-law, and every director or
officer of a corporation who commits, concurs, assents to, or acquiesces to
such contravention, is guilty of an offence and is liable to a fine of
a.

on a first offence, no more than $50,000; and

b.

on a second offence and each subsequent offence, not more than
$100,000,

and such other penalties, as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act and
the Municipal Act.
54.

In addition to any penalty otherwise provided for in this by-law, every
person convicted of an offence under this by-law is liable to a fine of not
more than $10,000 for each day during which the offence continues.

55.

Upon conviction any penalty imposed under this by-law may be collected
under the authority of the Provincial Offences Act.

56.

If a person is convicted of an offence for contravening a provision of this
by-law or an order made under this by-law, the court in which the
Page 66 of 114

PAGE 12

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

conviction has been entered, and any court of competent jurisdiction
thereafter, may order the person to correct the contravention in such
manner and within such period as the court considers appropriate.
Part X. Effective Date
57.

This by-law comes into full force and effect on May 1, 2026 at which time
all by-laws, policies or resolutions that are inconsistent with the provisions
of this by-law are hereby repealed or rescinded insofar as it is necessary to
give effect to the provisions of this by-law.
FINALLY PASSED AND ENACTED this 27 day of April, 2026.

Mayor Ian C. Boddy

Briana M. Bloomfield, City Clerk

Page 67 of 114

Schedule ‘A’ to By-law No. 2026-XXX
Patio Permit By-law
Part I. Design Requirements
Layout
1.

A Frontage Patio, Curbside Patio, and a Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this
by-law, are permitted on public lands.

2.

A Curb Lane Patio is permitted within a maximum of two (2) on-street
parking spaces or a curb lane and is only permitted on roadways with:
a.

A speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour, or less.

b.

No more than two lanes of traffic (one lane in each direction or two
lanes in the same direction).

c.

On-street parking in the form of parking laybys or parking lanes.

3.

The width of the public lands between the building’s face and the edge of
the curb must be a minimum of 3 metres, before a Frontage Patio or a
Curbside Patio will be considered.

4.

A Curbside Patio will only be permitted where adjacent to on-street
parking.

5.

A Curbside Patio shall be setback 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb,
unless adjacent to a Curb Lane Patio.

6.

An Operator shall design and maintain street furniture and patio layouts to
provide for a sufficient Accessible Route on the sidewalk to accommodate a
clear, unobstructed width as follows:
a.

On 2nd Avenue East, between 7th Street East and 10th Street East:
1.8 metres.

b.

On 8th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

c.

On 9th Street East, between 1st Avenue East and 3rd Avenue East:
1.5 metres.

d.

All other locations: 1.8 metres

7.

The Accessible Route required by Section 6 of Schedule A of this by-law
shall be maintained in a straight line within a street block and be located at
least 0.5 metres from the edge of the curb.

8.

Patio layouts that propose a pedestrian clearway into a parking or curb
lane are prohibited.

9.

A Frontage Patio and Curbside Patio are not permitted to encroach upon
the frontage of neighbouring properties without explicit consent.

10.

Permission to utilize on-street parking spaces in front of neighbouring
properties is not required for a Curb Lane Patio, as long as the
requirements of this by-law are met.
Page 68 of 114

PAGE 2
11.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

City street furniture including, but not limited to, benches, trees, bollards,
or poles, must be kept free and clear from all encumbrances and access
must be maintained to hanging planters and other horticultural
installations adjacent to the patio area.

Platforms
12.

A Curb Lane Patio, as defined by this by-law, requires the installation of a
platform to bring the patio surface at grade with the sidewalk.

13.

All platforms shall:
a.

Be firm, flat, stable, and have a non-slip, level surface with a
difference in elevation of no more than six (6) millimetres.

b.

Be constructed of composite, metal, or wood decking material.

c.

Have spaces between decking no more than one (1) centimetre in
width, so as to not allow canes, walkers, wheels or other mobility
assistance devices from becoming lodged or stuck between them.

d.

Have entrances from the sidewalk that are a minimum of 1.2 metres
in width.

e.

Have fencing installed along the perimeter, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law, where
there is a change in elevation between the adjacent surface.

f.

Not obstruct stormwater flows or block stormwater drains. The
Operator shall be responsible for clearance of any debris and overall
maintenance to ensure free flow.

g.

Not be affixed to the sidewalk, road, or curb edge with screws, bolts,
adhesives, or any other materials.

Roadside Barriers
14.

A Curb Lane Patio requires the installation of roadside barriers to mitigate
the risk of an errant vehicle striking either a pedestrian, restaurant patrons
seated at tables, or restaurant staff serving patrons.

15.

Roadside barriers are required to be provided and installed in the City road
allowance at the expense of the Operator.

16.

Roadside barrier installation and removal are required to be completed by
a qualified contractor trained in the Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.

17.

Roadside barriers shall:
a.

Be placed between 25 and 45 degrees upstream of the limits of a
Curb Lane Patio to protect from lateral impact.

b.

Be installed entirely within the limits of on-street parking spaces and
shall not encroach into any driving lane.

c.

Be installed according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

d.

Be a minimum of TL-1 MASH (Manual for Assessing Safety
Hardware) tested, in accordance with Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7.
TL-2 and TL-3 MASH tested barriers may also be accepted.

e.

Be equipped with an appropriate amount of retroreflective material
to provide adequate daytime and night-time visibility.

Page 69 of 114

PAGE 3

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Fencing
18.

Where possible, the requirement for fencing shall be minimized to reduce
visual clutter.

19.

A Frontage Patio and/or a Curbside Patio consisting of less than 15 tables
are not required to have fencing however, the perimeter of the patio area
is required to be delineated with tactile tape, as defined by this by-law, for
the benefit of the visually impaired.

20.

The Operator shall comply with all requirements of the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario as it relates to fencing of a licensed patio area.

21.

A Curb Lane Patio is required to have fencing, regardless of whether the
patio is licensed to serve alcohol or not.

22.

Where fencing is required, the following requirements shall be met:
a.

Fencing must have a minimum height of 0.9 metres and a maximum
height of 1.2 metres from the surface of the patio.

b.

Patios with fencing are required to have an open, unobstructed
entrance from the sidewalk that is a minimum of 1.2 metres wide.
The patio entrance shall align with the entrance of the applicable
business, where possible. No appurtenances of the patio including,
but not limited to, furniture, host stands, menu boards, or umbrellas,
are permitted to impede the entrance such that the clear width is
less than 1.2 metres.

c.

Fencing is not permitted to encroach within any portion of any
Accessible Route, as defined by this by-law. Fencing adjacent to the
Accessible Route is required to have a solid, cane-detectable base,
spaced no more than 0.3 metres apart and shall have a colour
contrast to the sidewalk to make it easily identifiable to pedestrians.

d.

Fencing shall be constructed of aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or
other solid material and shall consist of a dark or neutral colour.

e.

The use of chain-link, plastic, or vinyl fencing is prohibited.

f.

Fencing shall be open and transparent to maintain visibility from the
street.

g.

Fencing shall be free of jagged edges and other safety threats
brought on by poor design or construction.

h.

Fencing must be removable, free-standing, and self-supporting with
appropriate weights. Fencing required for a Curb Lane Patio is
permitted to be secured to a platform required by Section 12 to 13 of
Schedule A of this by-law. Any stability measures must not damage
public property, must not be designed to penetrate the surface of the
sidewalk or street and must be security without endangering any
underground utilities.

i.

Fencing is not permitted to obstruct vehicular or pedestrian
sightlines, fire routes, or fire hydrants, and is not permitted to
obstruct or be attached to any City street furniture including, but not
limited to, trees, benches, or light posts.

Sightlines
23.

Street furniture or a patio, including any appurtenances thereto, shall not
obstruct vehicular or pedestrian sightlines, visibility, or movements.
Page 70 of 114

PAGE 4

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

24.

No portion of street furniture or a patio shall obstruct the five metre by
five metre sightline triangle at City street intersections or a three metre by
three metre sightline triangle at private vehicular driveway entrances.

25.

A Curbside Patio and/or a Curb Lane Patio are not permitted within five (5)
metres of an intersection.

Furniture
26.

All patio furniture, including fencing, shall be made of durable, weather
resistant materials. Composite, metal, painted or stained wood, or other
durable material to the satisfaction of the Director, is required.

27.

Plastic, vinyl, and pressure treated wood furniture is prohibited.

28.

Patio furniture, including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, host stands,
and umbrellas are not permitted to encroach into any portion of an
Accessible Route or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

Sources of Shade
29.

The use of retractable awnings installed on the first storey of buildings is
permitted to provide shade to Frontage Patios and Curbside Patios.

30.

Awnings shall:
a.

Be installed to have a minimum height of 2.4 metres above the
walking surface.

b.

Not conflict with trees or other City street furniture within the
boulevard.

c.

Be flame-retardant in accordance with the requirements of the
Ontario Fire Code, where a fabric awning is proposed.

31.

The installation of an awning requires a Building Permit from the City’s
Chief Building Official in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario
Building Code.

32.

Umbrellas and tents are permitted appurtenant to a patio as a source of
shade.

33.

Tents must be sized 10 square metres or less. If more than one tent is
installed, they shall be 3 metres apart from each other, including from
neighbouring establishments tents. Tents must not be closed on more than
two sides. Abutting a building constitutes a closed side.

34.

Umbrellas and tents must:
a.

Stand at least 2.1 metres above the walking surface.

b.

Be flame-retardant and approved by the City’s Fire Prevention
Officer.

c.

Not encroach into any portion of an Accessible Route or obstruct a
building or patio entrance.

d.

Be properly weighed down to prevent being blown over by wind. Any
stability measures must not damage public property, must not be
designed to penetrate the surface of the sidewalk or street, and must
be secured without endangering any underground utilities.

e.

Be removed during inclement weather or high winds so as not to
create a safety hazard.

f.

Not obstruct sightlines for pedestrians, cyclists, or motorists.
Page 71 of 114

PAGE 5

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

35.

Posts and beams and/or a gazebo, pergola, trellis roof, or other similar
type of roof construction may be permitted as part of a proposed patio,
where indicated as part of a patio application pursuant to Part V of this bylaw, and subject to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code.

36.

Except for pre-manufactured tents described above, tarps or similar
roofing material are prohibited.

Fire Safety
37.

A minimum 1.8 metres clearance from fire department connections and
fire hydrants must be maintained on a patio.

38.

Fire hydrants and fire department connections must always be visible from
the street and accessible by Fire Services.

39.

If a patio is longer than 15 metres, emergency access points through the
patio may be required by the City Fire Prevention Office. Fire routes must
not be obscured by a patio.

Heaters
40.

All Patio flames and/or heaters, per the Ontario Fire Code, must meet the
requirements of Technical Standards and Safety Authority, be assembled
in accordance with the device’s manufacturer’s specifications and
installation in accordance with the same, which encompasses locations and
distances to combustibles.

41.

If use of propane and other flammable gases in cylinders on the Patio is
exercised, the Operator shall:

42.

a.

Not store any cylinders indoors.

b.

Store cylinders in lockable, non-combustible cabinets or cages that
are designed for such storage.

c.

Not store cylinders on sidewalk or any public thoroughfare.

d.

Store cylinders at least 0.9 metres from any building opening and
3.05 metres from any building’s mechanical air intake; and,

e.

Store propane cylinders 0.9 metres from other compressed gases.

No open flames are permitted where a fabric structure including, but not
limited to, an awning, tent, or umbrella, in installed appurtenant to a patio.

Waste Storage
43.

Operators shall provide a minimum of one (1) garbage receptacle for
patrons, the size and location of which shall be indicated on the Site Plan
required as part of a patio permit application, pursuant to Part V of this bylaw.

44.

Waste storage, collection, and the use of garbage bag tags shall be in
accordance with the City’s Waste Management By-law.

Signage
45.

Menu and sandwich board signage is permitted in accordance with the
City’s Sign By-law.

46.

Signage is not permitted to encroach into any part of an Accessible Route
or obstruct a building or patio entrance.

47.

Signage is not permitted to be displayed on any patio fencing or furniture.
Page 72 of 114

PAGE 6
48.

BY-LAW NO. 2026-XXX

Third-party advertisements within or on any part of the patio, including
umbrellas, are prohibited.

Plant Materials
49.

Plant materials appurtenant to a patio must be healthy, living, and
maintained throughout the season.

50.

Planter boxes are permitted to be used as fencing, where the requirements
of Section 18 to 22 of Schedule A of this by-law are met.

51.

Plant materials may be affixed to fencing, provided they do not protrude
more than 100 millimetres horizontally from the cane-detectable railing
and do not obstruct any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio
entrance, or driving lane.

52.

Ground planters may be used within the patio for decoration but shall not
exceed 0.5 metres in width and 1.0 metre in height. Planters with plant
material shall not exceed 1.2 metres in height.

53.

Hanging planters are permitted provide plant material does not extend
more than 0.5 metres from the hanging planter box and does not encroach
into any portion of an Accessible Route, building or patio entrance, or
driving lane.

Lighting
54.

Lighting is permitted within a patio, in accordance with the following
requirements:
a.

Lighting features are required to be temporary and comply with all
applicable safety standards and code.

b.

Lights may not exceed 3 metres in height.

c.

Lighting must be restricted to low voltage (12V system). 120VAC is
not permitted.

d.

Lights and power cables are not permitted to cross any portion of an
Accessible Route, building or patio entrance.

e.

Lighting shall be downward facing, dark sky compliant, and shall not
deflect onto neighbouring properties or the City street.

f.

Lights shall not attach City street furniture including, but not limited
to, utility poles, trees, and benches.

g.

Permission must be granted to the Operator for use of a power
source, if the Operator does not own it.

Street Furniture
55.

The placement of Street Furniture, as defined by this by-law, on public
lands, shall comply with the Operation requirements of Part VII of this bylaw and the design requirements set out in Schedule “A” of this by-law.

Page 73 of 114

CITY OF OWEN SOUND
PART I – PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT

Item

By-law No. 2026-XXX:
Patio Permit By-law
COLUMN 1
Short Form Wording

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

1

Construct, erect, operate patio between Nov 1 – Apr 30

s. 36

$500

2

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio between Nov 1-Apr 30

s. 36

$500

3

Operator - Fail to carry required insurance

s. 37.b.

$1,000

4

Operator - Fail to construct, erect, operate patio in accordance with patio
agreement

s. 37.c.

$500

5

Operator - Fail to obtain satisfactory inspection from CBO before
operating patio

s. 37.d.

$400

6

Operator - Fail to keep patio clean and in good repair

s. 37.e.

$500

7

Operator - Fail to return public land to original condition after season

s. 37.f.

$500

8

Operator – Fail to construct, erect, operate patio contiguous to frontage
of Operator’s business

s. 37.g.

$400

Page 74 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

9

Operator - Fail to clean and maintain public land under or adjacent to
patio

s. 37.i.

$500

10

Operator - Fail to report change in information

s. 39

$400

11

Construct, erect, operate patio without a valid patio permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

12

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without valid patio
permit

s. 40.a.

$1,000

13

Construct, erect, operate patio without an executed patio agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

14

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio without executed patio
agreement

s. 40.b.

$1,000

15

Construct, erect, operate patio while patio permit suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

16

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio while patio permit
suspended or revoked

s. 40.c.

$1,000

17

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of design requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

Page 75 of 114

Item

COLUMN 1

COLUMN 2

COLUMN 3

Short Form Wording

Provision
Creating or
Defining Offence

Set Fine

18

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of design
requirements

s. 40.d.

$1,000

19

Construct, erect, operate patio in violation of conditions in permit or
agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

20

Permit construction, erection, operation of patio in violation of conditions
in permit or agreement

s. 48.e.

$1,000

21

Operator – Transfer or assign patio permit without consent

s. 41.a.

$400

22

Operator – Alter patio design/layout contrary to conditions

s. 41.b.

$1,000

23

Operator – Obtain patio permit using false or incorrect information

s. 41.c.

$500

24

Prevent/hinder/obstruct lawful exercise of power under by-law

s. 45

$500

25

Fail to identify self upon request

s. 46

$500

26

Fail to comply with an order

s. 49

$500

NOTE: the general penalty provision for the offences listed above is section 52 of the By-law, a certified copy of which
has been filed.

Page 76 of 114

SCHEDULE C
ROADSIDE BARRIER OPTIONS
Option

Cost Per Unit*

Single Unit Size
(LxWxH)

Annual Rent

A

TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water
Filled)

$50 per unit per
month

1.8 m x 0.45 m x 0.8 m

$2,400

B

TL-1 Urban Barrier

$20 per meter per
month

2.7 m x 0.15 m x 1.15 m

$2,160

C

TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

$24 per meter per
month

1.6 m x 0.8 m x 0.8 m

$2,592

* Source: Municipality of Meaford Staff Report DEV2025-029
Estimates assume a patio located within one (1) parking stall, sized 6 m in length and 3 m in width, operating for
six (6) months total (May 1 to October 31).
Prices do not include delivery or other logistical costs.

Report: CS-26-031

Page 77 of 114
1

Option A – TL-1 Plastic (Sand or Water Filled)

Report: CS-26-031

Page 78 of 114
2

Option B – TL-1 Urban Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 79 of 114
3

Option C – TL-3 Concrete Jersey Barrier

Report: CS-26-031

Page 80 of 114
4

City Hall Illumination/Lighting Request Form
For full policy details outlining City Hall Illumination requests please see the Flag Flying Proclamations and Public
Awareness Campaigns policy here (City Hall Illumination starts on page 7).
Name of Requesting Organization *
Ontario Medical Association

Contact Information
Name *

Email Address *

Bianca Turchiaro

bianca.turchiaro@oma.org

Home/Cell Phone Number *

Work Phone Number
6479832424

City Hall Lighting Date(s)
Illumination requests will be granted for a maximum duration of seven (7) days unless there are no conflicting
requests in which case the duration may extend to a maximum duration of fourteen (14) days, at the discretion of
the City Manager.
Requests will be considered on a first come, first served basis, based on the date the request is received by the
City Manager’s office; requests should be made at least two (2) weeks in advance of the desired lighting date.
Please note that the changing of City Hall lights will take place on regular business days.
Starting Date of Illumination: *
5/1/2026

End Date of Illumination: *


5/1/2026



Requested Light Colours
At this time, the only colour options available are: Green, Blue, Red, White, and Pink/Purple.
No other colours are available at this time.
Please select the colour of your illumination request: *
Green
Blue
Red
White
Pink/Purple

Page 81 of 114

Details/Purpose of the illumination event: *
Every year, the Ontario Medical Association asks Ontarians to celebrate Doctors' Day and thank the amazing
doctors who work tirelessly to keep us healthy and safe. From doctors in the emergency room to specialists in
a clinic, Ontario's physicians care for all of us, even during health system issues and systemic barriers to care.
First recognized by the provincial government in 2011, the date was chosen to mark the birthday of Canada's
first female physician, Dr. Emily Stowe. In recent years, various landmarks, city halls, and other municipal
centers have lit up blue to celebrate our physicians, and we hope this year will be the biggest yet.

Description of your organization including a brief history and any other relevant information: *
The Ontario Medical Association is a not-for-profit organization that represents Ontario's 50,000+ physicians,
medical students, and retired physicians. The OMA advocates for and supports doctors while strengthening
their leadership role in patient care. We support doctors in their vision to be a trusted voice in transforming
Ontario's healthcare system. The OMA has members across the province, from Niagara Falls to Sioux
Lookout. The OMA will be promoting this event on our website and social media pages. For Doctors’ Day
2026, the sign’s likeness may appear in communications on both our website and our social media pages,
should a physician in Owen Sound send us a photo of the illumination of City Hall.

Would you like to submit your City Hall illumination request to happen annually? *
Yes, please repeat on an annual basis
No, this one time only
Please note that it is up to the person/group submitting the request to contact the City if the annual date changes
or discontinues for any reason.
By submitting this form, you affirm that the facts set forth in it are true and complete. All City Hall illumination
requests must adhere to the Flag Flying, Proclamations and Public Awareness Campaigns Policy.
The personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, 227 and City
Policy CMA34. The information is used for the City Hall lighting process including, but not limited to, evaluating
requests for illumination events and contacting the requestor.
City Manager Approval - signature & date

Date on Council Consent Agenda

Page 82 of 114

Correspondence Items Presented for Information
April 27, 2026
1)

Correspondence from AMCTO Re: Advocacy Update – Follow-Up to Budget
Update on Proposed MFIPPA Changes.

2)

Correspondence from the Deputy Clerk, City of Owen Sound Re: Regional
Governance Changes.

3)

Correspondence from the Intermediate Planner, Grey County Re: Age-Friendly
Action Plan Progress Report.

4)

Correspondence from the Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization
Branch, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Re: Proposed
Environmental Assessment Act Amendments to Improve the Comprehensive
Environmental Assessment Process.

5)

Correspondence from the Registrar, Ontario Energy Board Re: 2026 Generic
Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement Extension of
Intervention Deadline.

6)

Correspondence from the Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce
Peninsula Source Protection Committee Re: Possible Implications to the Clean
Water Act.

7)

Correspondence from the Chair, Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus Re:
Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform.

Page 83 of 114

Item 1

About AMCTO | Professional Growth | Advocacy & Policy | Network & Community

April 10, 2026
Advocacy Update: Follow-Up to Budget Update on Proposed
MFIPPA Changes
As a follow-up to our previous advocacy update outlining proposed changes
to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1990 (MFIPPA) made through the budget bill, we want to highlight our
concerns regarding the scope and depth of proposed changes on the
privacy side. These changes align the Act with similar changes made
previously to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act,
1989 (FIPPA), but do not consider municipal staff capacity or financial
constraints.
Privacy-related changes include:
•

Requiring that the head of an institution ensure that a written
assessment is prepared and contains certain information respecting
any Personal Information (PI) that is to be collected. This includes
but is not limited to:

Page 84 of 114

o

The purpose, intended use, and explanation for collection

o

Who will have access to the PI

o

Limitations or restrictions on collection, use or disclosure

o

Safeguard practices to protect the PI

o

Steps taken to prevent the likelihood of theft, loss,
unauthorized use, or disclosure of the PI

•

Requiring that risks are mitigated by ensuring the above steps are
implemented before collecting PI

•

Requiring that institutions provide access to the written assessment
to the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC)

•

Reporting any breach of privacy safeguards to the IPC and notifying
affected individuals

•

Outlining factors to determine the real risk of significant harm

•

Removing the definition of personal information bank

•

Imposing a right of access to PI

•

Authorizing the IPC to review information practices of an institution
where the IPC has received a complaint, with authorization to resolve
the matter through mediation, conciliation, and other informal
means.

•

Requiring an institution to assist the IPC in conducting a review

While we acknowledge that many of these proposals are important best
practices moving forward, we would like to offer the following
recommendations to the Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery
for consideration:
•

Over 80% of Ontario municipalities have populations under 50,000.
In many municipalities, the administrative function is performed by a
single employee, often the municipal clerk, who manages FOI and
privacy programs along with 80 other statutory responsibilities,

Page 85 of 114

which can include council governance, bylaw enforcement, and
elections.
•

As 2026 is a municipal and school board election year, wherein
municipal budget processes are disrupted with councils inaugurated
in November, requests for resources to support new requirements
may not be contemplated until 2027. This timing makes it extremely
challenging to transition to new rules that are proposed to be in
effect by January 1, 2027.

•

The January 1 deadline for privacy impact assessments is too short a
timeframe for municipalities to address new requirements and seek
new resources, including staff and funding support to action the new
requirements.

•

The scope of the privacy impact assessments is exceptionally broad.
It is not clear whether these would apply to information collected
going forward or would also retroactively apply, which would be an
insurmountable task for already overburdened municipal staff.
o

If retroactively applied, this will likely result in substantial costs
for institutions and take years for many municipalities to come
into compliance, given the above-noted limitations.

Given the varying levels of capacity and maturity across MFIPPA
institutions, we want to understand what resources the Ministry and the
Information and Privacy Commissioner are developing to support
municipalities in this transition and when they will be made available.
In the meantime, we have prepared the following redline version of the
Act, which shows the amendments Bill 97 proposes. We hope this makes it
easier for members to see the exact changes that are being proposed.
REVIEW REDLINE VERSION OF THE ACT
We also invite you to send us your templates, policies, procedures, and
other relevant resources related to:
•

Privacy impact assessments

Page 86 of 114

•

Information management best practices

•

Risk and breach management

•

Job advertisement requirements for staffing

•

Budget/business cases for more resources

Over the coming weeks, we will be reviewing materials to determine the
best next steps for how to support members, municipal clerks, and their
staff with implementing the proposed new requirements.
Please provide any resources you'd like to share with our policy and
advocacy team by Monday, April 20.
Our team will be continuing to evaluate the proposals to determine the full
impacts on municipal administration and service delivery, and welcomes
feedback from members with expertise in FOI and privacy.
We will also be applying to speak at Standing Committee where your
feedback will help inform our submission. Please provide your feedback as
soon as possible.
We will be seeking clarity with the Ministry over the coming days and will
provide updates as appropriate.

Page 87 of 114

Item 2
Staci Landry, Deputy Clerk
City of Owen Sound
808 2nd Avenue East
Owen Sound, ON N4K 2H4

Phone: 519-376-4440 ext. 1235
Facsimile: 519-371-0511
Email: slandry@owensound.ca
Website: www.owensound.ca

April 16, 2026
Via Email
Paul Vickers, MPP
Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound
paul.vickers@pc.ola.org
Dear Mr. Vickers:
Re:

Regional Governance Changes

City Council, at its meeting held on April 13, 2026, considered the above-noted
"THAT in consideration of items 1.c and 2.b on the
correspondence package (Item 11.l) listed on the April
13, 2026 Consent Agenda respecting Regional Governance
Changes, City Council directs staff to send a letter to Paul
Vickers, MPP for Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound expressing
concerns with the proposed changes to the Regional
Governance Act."
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Staci Landry
Deputy Clerk

Page 88 of 114

Item 3

Committee Report
To:

Warden Matrosovs and Members of Grey County Council

Committee Date:

March 26, 2026

Subject / Report No:

PDR-CW-11-26

Title:

Progress Report – Age-Friendly Action Plan

Prepared by:

Cassondra Dillman, Intermediate Planner

Reviewed by:

Scott Taylor, Director of Planning

Lower Tier(s) Affected:

All member municipalities in Grey County

Recommendation
1. That report PDR-CW-11-26 regarding the County’s Age-Friendly Action Plan
progress be received for information; and
2. That staff be authorized to make minor amendments to the County’s AgeFriendly Action Plan, without impacting the intent of the Plan, to enable
plan implementation; and
3. That staff be directed to share the Progress Report with all member
municipalities for information.

Executive Summary
Grey County is advancing its Age-Friendly Community vision to ensure residents of all
ages can live, work, and participate fully in safe and accessible environments. With the
County population aging rapidly, projected to have more than one-third of residents over
65 by 2035, it is important to prioritize planning for inclusive and Age-Friendly housing,
transportation, and community services.
Supported by a 2021 provincial grant, Grey County developed its Age-Friendly
Community Strategy and Action Plan, endorsed in 2022. The Plan outlines over 100
recommended actions based on the World Health Organization’s eight Age-Friendly
community dimensions and relies on collaboration across County departments,
municipalities, and over 20 community partners.
The progress report, linked in the attachment section below, identifies that half of the
action items have been completed, are underway, or are embedded in ongoing County

PDR-CW-11-26

1

March 26, 2026
Page 89 of 114

operations, and items from all eight dimensions have been initiated. A four-page
Progress Snapshot is also linked below to provide a high-level overview.
Staff are recommending minor updates to some action items to streamline actions,
update leads, and better align responsibilities, strengthening the County’s ability to
support residents of all ages and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly
Grey County.

Background and Discussion
An Age-Friendly Community is designed so everyone, including children, youth, adults,
and older residents, can live, work, and play in safe, accessible, and welcoming spaces.
Creating an Age-Friendly community begins by examining all parts of community life,
including land development, transportation, parks, social services through an AgeFriendly lens. Committing to seeing and addressing projects, issues, and policies
through this Age-Friendly lens is how we create Age-Friendly communities.
As Grey County grows and ages, the case for Age-Friendly planning only strengthens.
By 2035, more than 1 in 3 Grey residents will be over 65. By planning for Age-Friendly
housing, transportation, and community services, the County can support older adults to
maintain independence and thrive in their communities, as well as their caregivers and
their families. By focusing on the needs of the most vulnerable, from seniors to young
children, our communities become places where everyone can thrive no matter their
age, ability, or background.

Developing the County’s Age-Friendly Initiative
In 2021, Grey County successfully obtained a $60,000 Inclusive Community Grant, from
the Government of Ontario, to develop an Age-Friendly Community Strategy and Action
Plan. The project was highly collaborative with contributions from a stakeholder
committee, community organizations, member municipalities, County staff and over 700
residents. The completed Action Plan was endorsed by County Council in March 2022
and shared with all member municipalities.
Through this process, two important items emerged: a community vision focused on all
ages and an understanding of the Age-Friendly community building that is already
occurring throughout the County. As a result, the Action Plan emphasizes collaboration,
outlining over 100 recommended actions to address and advance key Age-Friendly
priorities regardless of age.

PDR-CW-11-26

2

March 26, 2026
Page 90 of 114

Action Plan Implementation
Grey County’s Age-Friendly Strategy and Action Plan are built around the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) eight community dimensions, ranging from physical infrastructure
(outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, housing) to soft infrastructure (respect
and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, community and information,
community support and health services, and social participation).
Since 2022, County staff have been working on plan implementation. While
accountability for the Plan lies with Grey County’s Planning department, successful
implementation requires efforts from all County departments and a wide range of
community partners. The Grey County Age-Friendly Communities Committee supports
this work and serves as a cross-sector network sharing resources and fostering
collaboration among those involved in Age-Friendly initiatives across the County.
The Action Plan also recommends regular progress reviews to help identify successes,
address gaps, and guide resources effectively. As Grey County is a two-tier
government, the Action Plan naturally connects and interacts with many existing
municipal services and community initiatives. The Plan provides a framework for AgeFriendly community planning. Building an Age-Friendly community is an iterative
planning process: revisions signal growth and strengthen the community’s Age-Friendly
vision. The detailed Progress Report and Progress Snapshot are linked in the
attachments section below.

What We’ve Learned
The following insights have emerged during the implementation and review of the AgeFriendly Action Plan:
Theme

Summary

Organizational AgeFriendly lens

Many County staff and departments apply an AgeFriendly lens in their daily work, making it part of our
organizational culture.

Broad range of AgeFriendly initiatives
underway

There are many projects and day-to-day activities
across County departments that aid Age-Friendly
community planning goals, some of which are above
and beyond those identified in the Action Plan.

Growing community
engagement and
participation

Community interest in Age-Friendly initiatives
continues to grow.

PDR-CW-11-26

3

March 26, 2026
Page 91 of 114

Local Age-Friendly
leadership

Age-Friendly fairs were hosted by both Grey
Highlands and Blue Mountains this past year. Grey
County was recognized by the province as an AgeFriendly Community in 2026, alongside the Town of
Hanover who has been a provincial leader in AgeFriendly planning since 2017.

The importance of
partnerships

Partnerships are essential for addressing complex
societal issues, such as mental health, addictions,
health care and homelessness. These issues are
beyond the capacity of one organization alone.

The COVID-19
pandemic

The pandemic changed how residents participate,
communicate, and engage with their communities,
while exposing the digital divide, disrupted volunteer
networks, and increased risk of social isolation
among older adults.

Staffing Resources

The absence of a dedicated Age-Friendly
Community Coordinator has added some complexity
to managing the plan and coordinating partners.

Evaluation

Although each action item included performance
indicators and a project lead, much of the data was
not easily available, the indicators did not always
reflect meaningful outcomes, and some identified
leads are no longer suitable.

These insights highlight that Grey County cannot achieve this vision alone. Partnerships
with municipalities, volunteer groups, and not-for-profits are essential to advancing AgeFriendly community planning goals. Grey County’s continued leadership, collaboration,
and commitment to learning will ensure a strong foundation for ongoing progress.

Next Steps
Grey County has made meaningful steps forward in implementing the Age-Friendly
Action Plan and important work remains ahead. The review identified opportunities to
strengthen community partnerships, improve outcome tracking, and identified initiatives
that require additional resources or collaboration.
Moving forward, staff will continue to implement and advance the Action Plan and
support the Age-Friendly Communities Committee. The progress review has also
identified some action items that would benefit from reassessment. Several action items
were identified for consolidation, division, retirement or shifted to a more appropriate
lead. Through this report staff are seeking Council’s support for making minor tweaks to
the Action Plan, without changing the intent of the Plan. The changes would aid in the

PDR-CW-11-26

4

March 26, 2026
Page 92 of 114

implementation of the Plan to streamline actions, update leads, and to better align
responsibilities. For example:
-

-

Action Item 4.5 - regarding the creation of a Grey County Accessibility Group - is
no longer necessary due to continued success of the Joint Accessibility Advisory
Committee. The review also identified four duplicate items in the original Plan.
In addition, staff separated nine action items within the report card into smaller,
more specific components to improve clarity and tracking.
The Action Plan assigns a lead and partner organization for each action;
however, many of these leads are no longer suitable because the corresponding
organizations or positions no longer exist.

After four years of working with the Plan, staff have identified these adjustments as
minor but valuable improvements. They will help strengthen implementation, enhance
tracking and maintain momentum toward building an Age-Friendly Grey County.

Financial and Resource Implications
None.

Relevant Consultation
☒
Internal: All County departments were consulted, including Long Term Care,
Transportation Services, Human Resources, Clerks and Legislative Services,
Paramedic Services, Economic Development, Tourism and Culture, Climate Change
Initiatives, Provincial Offences, and Communications
☒
External: Municipal staff and community organizations, including Grey Bruce
Health Unit, Beaver Valley Outreach, Alzheimer Society Grey-Bruce, Grey Bruce Legal
Clinic, Grey Bruce Elder Prevention Network, Osteoporosis Canada, Breaking Down
Barriers, and Regional Geriatric Program of Southwestern Ontario

Appendices and Attachments
Age-Friendly Action Plan Progress Report 2026.pdf
Age-Friendly Progress Snapshot 2026.pdf

PDR-CW-11-26

5

March 26, 2026
Page 93 of 114

Item 4

Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks

Ministère de l’Environnement, de
la Protection de la nature et des Parcs

Environmental Assessment
Modernization Branch

Direction de la modernisation des processus
d'évaluation environnementale

135 St. Clair Avenue West
4th Floor
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

135, avenue St. Clair Ouest
4e étage
Toronto ON M4V 1P5

April 20, 2026
TO:

Stakeholder Distribution List

RE:

Proposed Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) amendments to improve the
comprehensive environmental assessment (EA) process

Today, Ontario introduced the Protecting Ontario’s Workers and Economic Resilience Act, 2026
(POWER Act) in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. If made, the changes would support a more
efficient comprehensive EA process and make it easier to navigate by removing certain steps
while maintaining strong environmental protections and other consultation opportunities.
The proposed legislation would, if passed, amend the Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) to
make three key changes to the comprehensive EA process:
• Remove the requirement to publish and consult on a Ministry Review
• Remove the opportunity for the public to request a hearing before the Ontario Land
Tribunal (Tribunal) while maintaining the Minister’s authority to refer an application or
matter related to an application to the Tribunal for a hearing and decision on their own
initiative
• Remove the requirement for Cabinet approval of the Minister’s decision, while providing
the Minister discretion to refer an application to Cabinet for a decision
In addition, we also proposed minor updates to improve clarity and flexibility in the EAA.
If the proposed EAA amendments are made, the regulation that sets out deadlines for certain
steps in the comprehensive EA process (Ontario Regulation 616/98 (Deadlines)) would be
adjusted to align with the changes.
The proposal has been posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) for public
comment. More information is available here. Input is being accepted until May 20, 2026.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at EAModernization.MECP@ontario.ca.
Any comments on the proposal can be submitted through the ERO posting via the link above, or
by email to us.

Page 94 of 114

We are committed to keeping you apprised about EA modernization and working with you to build
a strong EA program for Ontario. We value your perspectives on the EA program and look
forward to your further participation. More information on our other efforts to modernize the EA
program can also be found here.
Sincerely,

Annamaria Cross
Director, Environmental Assessment Modernization Branch
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks

Page 2 of 2

Page 95 of 114

Item 5

BY EMAIL

April 17, 2026

TO:

All Municipalities
All Natural Gas Utilities
Frequent Intervenors
Information Session Participants

Re:

2026 Generic Proceeding to Review the Model Franchise Agreement
Extension of Intervention Deadline
Ontario Energy Board File Number: EB-2026-0009

The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) wishes to thank all municipalities, gas utilities, and
other interested parties who attended the recent municipal franchise generic proceeding
information session on April 15, 2026. The high level of engagement and thoughtful
questions underscored the importance of this proceeding and the value of broad
participation.
As explained in the Notice of Hearing, municipalities, gas utilities, and other interested
parties who wish to actively participate in this proceeding must apply for intervenor
status and, where applicable, cost eligibility using the OEB’s online Intervention Form.
Following the information session, the OEB noted a common concern that some
municipalities may be unable to meet the pre-established deadline for requesting
intervenor status in this proceeding. In response to this concern, the OEB is extending
the deadline to apply for intervenor status to May 1, 2026.
The OEB also acknowledges comments from various municipalities regarding potential
challenges for active municipal participation in this proceeding due to the upcoming
municipal election cycle. The OEB intends to consider this in designing its procedural
schedule, which will be issued at a later date.
The commissioners assigned to this proceeding are: David Sword (presiding), Robert
Dodds, and James Sidlofsky.

2300 Yonge Street, 27th floor, P.O. Box 2319, Toronto, ON, M4P 1E4

T 416-481-1967

1-888-632-6273

2300, rue Yonge, 27e étage, C.P. 2319, Toronto (Ontario) M4P 1E4

F 416-440-7656

OEB.ca

Page 96 of 114

Ontario Energy Board

-2Should you have any questions regarding this proceeding, please contact Natalya
Plummer at natalya.plummer@oeb.ca.
Yours truly,

Ritchie
Murray

Digitally signed by Ritchie
Murray
Date: 2026.04.17
14:26:16 -04'00'

Ritchie Murray
Registrar

Page 97 of 114

Item 6

April 13, 2026
Hon. Todd J. McCarthy
Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Dear Minister McCarthy,
Upon review of the recent changes to Ontario Conservation Authorities and proposed further
changes that could impact the Clean Water Act and its Regulations, our Source Protection
Committee collaborated on the following response.
Over the last 25 years, protection of municipal drinking water sources in Ontario has improved
dramatically. However, as the landscape and the climate changes, we must remain vigilant and
continue with drinking water source protection measures to ensure that there continues to be safe
water available for public consumption. Recently, the Province announced changes to boundaries
for the regional consolidation of Ontario’s conservation authorities. This reconfiguration must
align with the fundamental basis of Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report
recommendation to maintain watershed-based drinking water source protection at the local level.
As a Source Protection Committee, we strongly advocate that Justice O’Connor’s
recommendations are respected to ensure that source protection planning and implementation
remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches.
The integrity of the drinking water source protection program is local, watershed-based
committees that include members from the agriculture, business/commerce/industry, municipal,
environment and health sectors. These members have a vested interest in the sources and drinking
water systems that supply their families, neighbours and constituents with a safe supply of drinking
water. Dilution of this oversight to the new regional conservation authority scale will not serve the
recommendations made by Justice O’Connor following the tragedy that happened in Walkerton in
our Source Protection Region. Our region and its residents are considerably more familiar and
unwilling to waver on the core principles of the program.
Justice O’Connor’s Walkerton Inquiry report recommended watershed-based drinking water
source protection planning at the local level by those most directly affected. To ensure that source
protection planning and implementation remain responsive to local issues and policy approaches,
and to minimize the need for time consuming administrative changes and conformity exercises,
the province should consider:
• Adopting the current scale of Source Protection Regions as the largest geographic extent for the
proposed regional Conservation Authorities. A single regional Source Protection Authority
spanning numerous municipalities risks weakening local accountability, distancing decisionmaking from watershed-specific realities, and diluting the local focus that is foundational to
effective watershed management.

Page 98 of 114

• Retaining the current geographic scale of Source Protection Areas. Ensuring that Assessment
Reports (ARs) and Source Protection Plans (SPPs) would continue to be reflective of local
drinking water threats, vulnerabilities, and policy approaches. While also helping ensure that
conformity exercises and consequential amendments to ARs and SPPs would be minimized.
Consolidation of ARs and SPPs to reflect changed Source Protection Area boundaries would be
time consuming and contribute little to the outcomes of the source protection program.
• Maintaining local representation on Source Protection Committees (SPCs) to ensure that
municipal, economic, public interest holders, and implementation bodies continue to have a voice
in identifying needed amendments to plans and overseeing progress towards achieving the
objectives of SPPs. Continued alignment of SPCs with Source Protection Region jurisdictions
would help ensure local representation and accountability.
The Source Protection Committee has deep concerns about possible implications to the Clean
Water Act as a result of the recent Conservation Authority Act changes. It is our intent to continue
to work with the province, local municipalities and local Source Protection Authorities to protect
our local sources of drinking water in the spirit of Justice O’Connor’s recommendations.
Sincerely,

Dick Hibma
Acting Chair, Saugeen, Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula
Source Protection Committee
Cc via email: Kirsten Service, MECP
Source Protection Authorities
Municipal Clerks

2

Page 99 of 114

Item 7

Monday, April 20, 2026
Premier of Ontario
Hon. Doug Ford
Legislative Building, Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Sent via email: premier@ontario.ca
Re: Support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform
At its regular meeting on April 10, 2026, the Western Ontario Wardens’ Caucus adopted the following motion in
support of Finlay’s Law on Emergency Room Reform:

13 Ontario Medical Association for Doctors' Day Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL

Council postponed a resolution regarding research into art gallery operating models until a future service review report is available.

13 Ontario Medical Association for Doctors' Day Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL

Ontario Medical Association for Doctors' Day
Correspondence received which is presented for the information of
Council
COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL
12.a
Minutes of the Corporate Services Committee meeting held on April 9,
12.b
Minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on April 23, 2026
(Minutes to Follow)
12.c
Minutes of the Service Review Implementation Ad Hoc Committee
meeting held on April 8, 2026
MATTERS POSTPONED
13.a
Council Resolution No. S-241209-003 Postponed from the December
9, 2024 Special Meeting Re: Research Art Gallery Operating Models
S-241209-003
"THAT in consideration of the 2025 draft operating budget, City Council
directs staff to add to their workplan to research art gallery operating
models and report back to Council on the options available."
S-241209-004
“THAT in consideration of the 2025 draft operating budget, City Council
postpones Resolution No. S-241209-003 respecting art gallery
operating models until the report evaluating Service Review Project

14 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given.

No motions requiring prior notice were presented for this agenda item.

14 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given.

MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN
There are no motions for which notice was previously given.

15 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

The section contains no substantive discussion, figures, or decisions, as the provided text offers no newsworthy details beyond the agenda header.

15 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

16 MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT FORMAL SESSION

The committee of whole rises to report back to the formal session, concluding the procedural agenda item.

16 MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT FORMAL SESSION

MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT
FORMAL SESSION

17 MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

The House moved to adopt proceedings in Committee of the Whole.

17 MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

18 NOTICES OF MOTION

The agenda item lists Notices of Motion without specific content, figures, or decisions in the provided excerpt.

18 NOTICES OF MOTION

NOTICES OF MOTION

19 MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:

The City Council moved into closed session to consider an undisclosed matter.

19 MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:

MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION
"THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:

20 REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

The agenda item concludes with the formal reporting out of a closed session.

20 REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

21 BY-LAWS

The agenda item authorizes a series of by-laws to confirm council proceedings, establish fees for waste disposal, and adopt a new tax policy. It further regulates street furniture and patios, repeals specific order sections, and authorizes agreements for fire fighter collective bargaining, street sweeping, and provincial funding for transportation and court security.

21 BY-LAWS

BY-LAWS
21.a
By-law No. 2026-038
"A By-law to confirm the proceedings of the Regular Meeting of the
Council of The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound held on the 27th
day of April, 2026"
21.b
By-law No. 2026-039
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement
with The Corporation of the Municipality of Meaford and The
Corporation of the Township of Georgian Bluffs respecting access to
and use of the City’s Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Site"
21.c
By-law No. 2026-040
"A By-law to amend Fees and Charges By-law No. 2025-060 to
establish an Election Map fee and a Contractor Disposal fee for the
City’s Leaf and Yard Waste Site"
21.d
By-law No. 2026-041
"A By-law to Adopt a Policy Respecting Taxes for the City of Owen
Sound"
21.e
By-law No. 2026-042
"A By-law to licence, regulate and govern the construction, erection
and operation of Street Furniture and Sidewalk Patios on Public Lands"
21.f
By-law No. 2026-043
"A By-law to amend Preservation of Order on Streets By-law No. 1989138 to repeal section 2.18 in its entirety"
21.g
By-law No. 2026-044
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Collective
Agreement with the Owen Sound Professional Fire Fighters
Association Local 531, for the years 2019-2026"
21.h
By-law No. 2026-045
"A By-law to amend Delegation of Powers and Duties By-law No. 2014109 respecting approval authority for patio permits"
21.i
By-law No. 2026-046
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement
with The Corporation of the County of Grey respecting street
sweeping"
21.j
By-law No. 2026-047
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Letter of
Agreement with His Majesty the King in right of Ontario as represented
by the Minister of Transportation respecting the Dedicated Gas Tax
Funds for Public Transportation Program"
21.k
By-law No. 2026-048
"A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Transfer
Payment Agreement with His Majesty the King in right of Ontario as
represented by the Solicitor General respecting the Court Security and
Prisoner Transportation (CSPT) Program"

22 ADJOURNMENT

The assembly adjourned.

22 ADJOURNMENT

ADJOURNMENT

Summary

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Related Discussion

Transcript Notice

Full Transcript

2 CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

4 CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES

4.a Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Council meeting held on March 23, 2026

4.b Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on April 13, 2026 MOTION TO MOVE COUNCIL INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

6 PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings.

7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

8 PUBLIC FORUM

9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED There are no correspondence items being presented for consideration.

10 REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 10.a

11 Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council CONSENT AGENDA

11.a Report CS-26-030 from the Manager of Planning and Heritage Re: Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act,

11.b Report CS-26-031 from the Senior Planner Re: Patio Permit By-law

11.c Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences:

11.d • GlowUp Beauty, anail and eye lash studio located at 968 2nd Avenue West • Good Neighbour Resale, agrocery store for dry...

13 Ontario Medical Association for Doctors' Day Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL

14 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given.

15 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

16 MOTION THAT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT FORMAL SESSION

17 MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

18 NOTICES OF MOTION

19 MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:

20 REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

21 BY-LAWS

22 ADJOURNMENT

Related Links