Council Meeting - Regular Agenda Preview — May 25, 2026
Hook: Wastewater Plant Digestor Clean-out
Owen Sound · Council Meeting - Regular · May 25, 2026
Summary
One-sentence summary: On May 25, 2026 at 5:30 PM, Council will consider the following: - **Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance:** A non-standard procurement for a critical digestor clean-out requiring an eight-week shutdown beginning mid-June 2026.
On May 25, 2026, at 5:30 PM, Council considers a critical, non-standard procurement for an eight-week shutdown of the wastewater treatment plant digestor scheduled to begin mid-June 2026. Staff requests discussion on this essential maintenance required to prevent unregulated discharge and ensure equitable service. Simultaneously, the agenda examines a proposal to shift financial responsibility for sewer connections and road maintenance to users, changes that may impact residents and businesses. Council also directs potential amendments to authorize a By-law Enforcement Officer to improve compliance through education, while weighing conditions for decorative railings to ensure snow removal safety. Staff seeks direction on reconstructing 4th Avenue West to calm traffic and preserve parking, with funding expected from the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund, and proposes dedicating a land strip as a highway to resolve legal access issues. Further, the meeting reviews a new three-year cycle for fee reviews, a proposed sale of a surplus municipal lane despite public comments, and clarifies City obligations for new school construction where specific components are contributed by the municipality. Finally, administrative updates consolidate council seating policies to simplify operations, with staff coordinating next steps pending explicit Council direction.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Approval of Non-Standard Procurement - Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out: Owen Sound's wastewater plant faces escalating clogging risks in its single-digestor system, threatening service continuity for nearby residents. A critical, eight-week maintenance shutdown is scheduled to begin mid-June 2026, requiring specialized non-competitive contracts with Saugeen Agri Services and Maurice Mechanical under By-law No. 2020-022. The $304,314 project will drain the 2,000-cubic-metre unit, replace valves, repair structural supports, and restore biological operations using nitrogen purging for safety. With land application equipment owned by Saugeen, biosolids removal remains essential to prevent unregulated discharge. The dry-season timing aims to minimize costly haulage impacts from wet-weather inflows, ensuring equitable service without tax-funded rate hikes. Public engagement is posted online, with no anticipated community disruption pending approval.
- Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer: The City plans to hire a part-time By-law Enforcement Officer starting June 8, 2026, to improve compliance through education and enforcement. This new role will require amending the Appointed Officers By-law to formally appoint Peter Schultz and secure additional systems and infrastructure, though the 2026 budget has already approved the financial resources. No environmental impacts are expected. Simultaneously, an application for decorative railings and awnings at 790 2nd Avenue East is under review. Staff support the project but recommend specific conditions: a minimum vertical clearance of 2.5 metres to ensure room for snow removal equipment and future grade changes, and a maximum horizontal projection of 1.0 metre. Council must approve these conditions and authorise an encroachment agreement that incorporates the safety requirements and height adjustments.
- 2026 Fees and Charges: Owen Sound proposes a new three-year cyclical review for service fees, meaning charges are examined at least once every three years rather than annually, starting in 2026. This shift addresses staff capacity while allowing immediate updates for operational needs or legal changes. User fees are projected to cover roughly 10% of the 2026 operating budget. Specific changes clarify that public works event fees apply only to for-profit entities requiring road closures or barricades, replacing previously free items with costs of $15 for barrels and $5 for barricades. Charges double for after-hours work outside standard business hours. New fees include higher costs for non-residential construction permits, short-term rentals, and cemetery services, with administrative charges for payments and cheques reflecting actual expenses. Water rates outside city boundaries will double, and transit fares will increase for adults and seniors. The municipality also proposes dedicating a parkland parcel near Highway 32nd Street East to the highway instead of a multi-use trail to ensure property access and utility crossings. Road closure deposits and oversize permit fees rise to cover patrol and detour costs. A new event deposit aims to prevent organizers from holding unlimited dates without payment. These structural changes shift financial responsibility for sewer connections and road maintenance costs to residents and businesses, potentially impacting those with fewer resources navigating an increasingly expensive civic infrastructure.
- 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps: City staff are requesting Council direction to finalize detailed designs for the Fourth Avenue West reconstruction ahead of the 2027 construction window, aiming to update aging underground utilities. Although a multi-use path option was previously deferred, staff highlight Option 1A as the standard reconstruction plan, while presenting Option 2A as a cost-effective alternative. Option 2A proposes narrowed road widths that traffic calm speeds and preserve on-street parking, potentially lowering long-term snowplow maintenance costs compared to wider surfaces. This design choice directly addresses resident concerns about speeding and parking, with funding expected entirely from the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund. Simultaneously, the City anticipates seeking Council approval for a traffic by-law amendment to add two short-term parking spaces near the Library, Art Gallery, and Tourism offices, an increase from a single previously considered space, to better serve summer visitors needing quick drop-offs. Staff from Public Works, Engineering, and Finance will coordinate next steps, procurement, and community communication without committing to immediate tendering or proposing a new public information centre unless specifically directed. Further public consultation will proceed regarding the project's timing and specific design details before final approval moves forward.
- Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-1225: The City proposes dedicating a five-metre-wide strip of land at 3195 East Bayshore Road as a public highway. Developer Skyline Developments initiated this dedication via a Parkland Dedication Agreement in September 2025 to streamline utility and servicing access. Because a parkland block previously separated the road right-of-way from an adjacent property, legal access complications arose; converting the land to a highway resolves this. Staff recommend this route as cost-effective, requiring minimal capital or operating expenses and fitting within existing work plans. Alternatively, granting multiple service easements would consume considerable staff time, incur legal costs, and potentially encumber future property sales. City Council must approve the non-standard procurement for a wastewater treatment plant digestor clean-out, involving an eight-week shutdown where hazardous biosolids must be hauled away continuously. This work includes assessing and repairing critical equipment only accessible when the plant is offline, occurring approximately every five years. The estimated upset limit for this necessary maintenance is $309,669.93.
- Policy Consolidation Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001: Grey County staff are proposing an administrative update that consolidates two existing policies into one single document to simplify council operations. This merger would combine the rules for selecting an alternate County Council member with those governing city board memberships and dais seating. The new unified policy would apply to all council members except the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, who already sit on the upper-tier council. Under this framework, an alternate member would serve the full term and step in when the Mayor or Deputy Mayor cannot attend. The selection process allows for open nominations by the Mayor, with the final candidate determined by a simple majority vote, a random draw, or by selecting the member with the highest votes if a majority cannot be reached. Once selected, the member receives appointment by by-law. Concurrently, City Council is directing staff to amend Appointed Officers By-law No. 2015-054 to appoint a By-law Enforcement Officer. This officer would foster regulatory compliance through education and enforcement under the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019. The City Clerk is authorised to review this specific policy every five years or sooner if legislative changes occur, though any revisions to the policy's intent will require Council consideration. No financial costs or resource changes are expected from these administrative updates.
- 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments: A two-year negotiation to split and sell a surplus municipal lane between 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West is set to conclude with a proposed June 19, 2026, closing. Two parties submitted offers to purchase the divided portions, valuing the land based on previous appraisals, after paying survey deposits and undergoing staff-led assessments including tree and sewer reviews. While the City Clerk received one public objection from neighbour John Tennant, who claims the lands form part of his fenced backyard and fears privacy loss, the City confirmed the lane is registered and protected from adverse possession. Staff recommend completing the sale, with all legal and survey costs borne by buyers totaling roughly $16,220. A by-law authorising these transfers is proposed for June 15, 2026, following notices delivered to neighbours within a 60-metre radius to allow ten days for comment. Concurrently, the City prepares to update its 2026 Fees and Charges by-law effective July 1, with user fees projected to cover about 10% of the operating budget.
- Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) - Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit: The Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board plans a new three-storey secondary school in Sydenham Heights, targeting fall 2028 occupancy following a 2025 rezoning from Rural to Institutional use. City funding currently covers only specific water components and a pedestrian tunnel connection, while the Board fronts most servicing costs. A Master Servicing Agreement is required before any building permit can be issued, mandating proof that infrastructure like watermains, new roads, and sidewalks will be funded and built. The City intends to recover watermain extension costs from eleven future neighbouring properties and seek full reimbursement for the tunnel from a commercial developer via a Capital Cost Recovery Agreement. Estimated area-specific debt is $111,000, though the project seeks exemption from these charges while the City contributes up to $250,000 for pressure-reducing valves. The City has tentatively recommended awarding a $2.46 million tender for pedestrian tunnel rehabilitation to start in June 2026, contingent on Council approval. A temporary asphalt sidewalk may connect north of the rail trail pending environmental and archaeological studies. Adjacent developers will eventually pay for sidewalk costs through future recovery mechanisms. Off-site works require approvals from the County, MTO, and GSCA, with financial responsibilities largely resting with the applicant or shared via future recovery from benefiting parties.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Owen Sound
- Body
- Council Meeting - Regular
- Date
- May 25, 2026
- Transcript Status
- Agenda package summary and extracted subreport text
- Transcript URL
- https://helpos.ca/transcripts/owen-sound/council-meeting-regular/2026-05-25
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This page is an accessibility-focused summary and extracted agenda text intended to promote civic accessibility.
It is an unofficial convenience copy and may contain extraction or summarization errors.
For the authoritative record, try to access the original source materials from Owen Sound using the original link below.
Full Transcript
2 CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
The agenda item calls for additional business to be considered.
2 CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
The section contains no substantive text or newsworthy details beyond the header title.
3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
4 CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES 4.a
The council formally confirmed the minutes from the previous session.
4 CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES 4.a CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNCIL MINUTES 4.a
5 Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on May 11,
Council moved into Committee of the Whole.
5 Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on May 11, Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on May 11, 2026 MOTION TO MOVE COUNCIL INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
6 PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings.
The agenda item for public meetings is explicitly cancelled, with no sessions scheduled.
6 PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings. PUBLIC MEETINGS There are no public meetings.
7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
The section covers deputations and presentations, specifically noting a deputation from the Grey Bruce One World Festival regarding its 15th Annual event.
7 DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 7.a Deputation from Donald Anderson, Chairperson, and Colleen Purdon, Co-Chair, Grey Bruce One World Festival Re: 15th Annual One World
8 PUBLIC FORUM
The section contains no substantive content beyond the header label.
8 PUBLIC FORUM PUBLIC FORUM
9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED 9.a
Correspondence requiring council direction is noted.
9 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED 9.a CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION OF COUNCIL IS REQUIRED 9.a
10.a Report CS-26-045 from the Director of Community Services Re: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) - Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit
The Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board plans a new three-storey secondary school in Sydenham Heights, targeting fall 2028 occupancy following a 2025 rezoning from Rural to Institutional use. City funding currently covers only specific water components and a pedestrian tunnel connection, while the Board fronts most servicing costs. A Master Servicing Agreement is required before any building permit can be issued, mandating proof that infrastructure like watermains, new roads, and sidewalks will be funded and built. The City intends to recover watermain extension costs from eleven future neighbouring properties and seek full reimbursement for the tunnel from a commercial developer via a Capital Cost Recovery Agreement. Estimated area-specific debt is $111,000, though the project seeks exemption from these charges while the City contributes up to $250,000 for pressure-reducing valves. The City has tentatively recommended awarding a $2.46 million tender for pedestrian tunnel rehabilitation to start in June 2026, contingent on Council approval. A temporary asphalt sidewalk may connect north of the rail trail pending environmental and archaeological studies. Adjacent developers will eventually pay for sidewalk costs through future recovery mechanisms. Off-site works require approvals from the County, MTO, and GSCA, with financial responsibilities largely resting with the applicant or shared via future recovery from benefiting parties.
Page 83 of 304 new 15th Street East road, intersection improvements on 28th Avenue East, pedestrian connections, and related servicing works. A Master Servicing Strategy is proposed to establish the overall servicing framework, with future staff-delegated servicing agreements to implement individual phases. The BGCDSB will front-end most servicing costs, while the City’s direct contribution is limited primarily to the pressure reducing valve and five water service laterals (within the approved capital budget of up to $250,000) and advancing a sidewalk link on 16th Street East, to be fully recovered from the future commercial developer. The report also proposes a Capital Cost Recovery Agreement so the City can recover portions of the water main extension cost from eleven (11) benefiting properties as they develop in the future. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development, planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents and tourists. Previous Report/Authority: Consent B02-2024 Consent Agreement (GY270643-Notice Consent Agreement) By-law No. 2025-079 (ZBA 56) was approved in 2025 to rezone the ‘Rural’ zoned portion of the property to the ‘Institutional’ (I) zone. (At that time, a two-storey school was proposed). Minor Variance A15-2025 increased the permitted height to allow a 3-storey structure as required by changes to Provincial requirements. Pre-Grading Agreement DA-26-003 Site Plan Approval for 2753 15th Street East (ST2025-018) – BGCDSB (GY282176 – Registered Site Alteration Agreement) Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 2 of 14 Page 84 of 304 Background: In spring of 2022, the Ministry of Education announced capital funding to support the construction of a new secondary school in Owen Sound. The current high school is over capacity, and a process toward selecting a new site was commenced. The applicant originally engaged the City in the pre-consultation process in 2023. The City’s response outlined the necessary approvals process based on the plans provided and identified that additional pre-consultation would be required at future stages, given the complexities of developing the lands and as the findings of required studies may have design implications. Consent Created Parcel in 2024 The subject lands and a road allowance for 15th Street East were severed from a larger property through Consent B02-2024. A consent agreement entered into by BGCDSB, the owner of the retained parcel, and the City of Owen Sound is registered on title and includes various requirements, such as the provision of plans and record drawings, acquisition of permits, land conveyance, construction, installation, and/or provision of transportation and servicing work, payment of capital contributions (including parkland dedication), completion of studies, and acquisition of site plan approval. Zoning By-law Amendment Approved to Permit a School By-law No. 2025-079 (ZBA 56) was approved in July 2025 to rezone the ‘Rural’ zoned portion of the property to its current ‘Institutional’ (I) zone. This by-law is now in full force and effect. Minor Variance was Required to Address Change in Height of School The BGCDSB had originally planned to construct a two-storey school on the subject lands; however, the Ministry of Education requested that the proposed building be redesigned as a three-storey school to comply with revised Provincial efficiency standards. Minor Variance A15-2025 approved a maximum building height of 16 metres, provided that construction occur substantially in accordance with the sketch submitted with the application (which the subject site plan does). This variance is now in effect. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 3 of 14 Page 85 of 304 Site Alteration Agreement In the fall of 2025, the BGCDSB entered into a Site Alteration Agreement with the City of Owen Sound to complete preliminary grading for work both onsite and within the 15th Street East road allowance to provide interim access to the site. Conditions of the agreement required requisite approvals from the Grey Sauble Conservation Authority (GSCA), Ministry of Transportation (MTO), and the County of Grey, as well as that the work be in accordance with mitigation measures specified in an Environmental Impact Study. It was acknowledged at that time that construction of the permanent road would require a separate future Servicing Agreement with the City of Owen Sound. The applicant engaged the City in a final pre-consultation process in late 2025, through which the City confirmed the formal application requirements toward Site Plan Approval and Servicing Agreements. Site Plan Approved in April 2026 Site Plan Approval (DA-26-003) was granted on April 30, 2026, subject to conditions. Among other matters, conditions of approval require the execution of a Site Plan Agreement and a Master Servicing Agreement with the City. The BGCDSB is moving forward with its consulting team to fulfill the conditions of site plan approval. Development Features 3-storey Secondary School Building (10,076 m2/108,460 ft2): o o o o The main building is located close to 28th Avenue East. A canopied entrance to the school faces north, aligning with the access from 15th Street East (new local road). Internal corridors lead to secondary entrances at the northwest, southwest, and southeast. Outside of the main entrance is a patio area with seating. Along the west side of the building are a variety of seating options, both within landscaped areas and hard surfaces. Shop Building (944 m2 / 10,161 ft2). Future Portables planned for (up to 8). Pedestrian access to buildings: o Paved pathways are provided around the perimeter of the building, generally 3 metres in width, connecting all main Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 4 of 14 Page 86 of 304 o o o Bus Layby and Small Parking Lot: o o o o o An on-site dedicated bus layby is proposed along the north side of the school. The vehicular access to this layby is shared with a small parking area. This area has two accesses to 15th Street East, allowing buses to pull in and through the layby. Parking stalls are separated from the bus layby by an island. Two (2) barrier-free parking spaces in this area are adjacent to the sidewalk leading to the main building entrance. Main Parking Area: o o o o entrances to the building with adjacent streets, the shop, future portables, patio seating, bus loading, and parking areas. Where crossing of drive aisles is necessary, Tactile Walking Surface Indicators (TWSIs) are proposed with a painted crossing (or HUB system) to differentiate these pathways from the main parking aisles. Connections are provided to the 15th Street East sidewalk and pedestrian pathway, as well as the athletic field path. Future sidewalk along 28th Avenue East is planned to be constructed when connecting routes are available. A separate vehicular entrance from 15th Street East to the main parking area is west of the bus layby and small parking area. This parking lot is located between the school and the athletic fields. The main drive aisle is also the Fire Route and provides access to loading spaces and waste receptacles which are south of the main building in the vicinity of the shop. Three (3) barrier free parking spaces in this area are adjacent to the sidewalk leading to the westerly building entrance. Athletic Field Access: o o West of the parking area, the land slopes down towards a watercourse that bisects the westerly portion of the property from south to north. There are two athletic fields proposed, one on either side of this watercourse. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 5 of 14 Page 87 of 304 o o A pedestrian pathway from the sidewalk around the school building crosses the parking lot at the narrowest point with TWSIs and painted crossing (or HUB system) and connects to an asphalt pathway for access to the easterly athletic field. Due to the slope, this 3 metre wide asphalt pathway includes a switchback, with an informal stone staircase providing a shortcut for those that are able to use it. o o The switchback pathway is labelled to have a maximum slope of 5 per cent (1:20). At the apex of the switchback, the path widens and a seating area is provided. The downslope of this seating area is protected by armour stones designed as the top level of seating built into the slope for viewing athletic events. Barrier free viewing is thereby incorporated into the overall landscape design. This asphalt pathway rounds the northeast corner of the easterly athletic field and connects to the pedestrian pathway in the 15th Street East road allowance and connecting to the westerly athletic field. The sidewalk around the school also connects to the sidewalk on the south side of 15th Street East between the two parking areas, without crossing the parking lot. This provides another route to the pedestrian pathway and westerly athletic field from the school. An informal crossing of the watercourse is proposed between the two athletic fields. This watercourse is quite shallow and includes naturalized plantings to protect natural heritage and habitat features in this area. Directing students to cross in a specific location is intended to deter crossing through other parts of this naturalized area thereby better protecting significant features. Lighting: o o A site lighting plan has been provided demonstrating that the school, parking lots, and sidewalk areas will be well-lit. The easterly athletic field is proposed to have electrical installed for light fixtures. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 6 of 14 Page 88 of 304 The BGCDSB is anxious to tender both the building construction and off-site works toward a planned occupancy in the fall of 2028. The purpose of this report is to: Present the overall strategy for off-site works (Master Servicing Strategy); Present the approach to recover certain costs by the City on behalf of the BGCDSB from future developers; and Request approval for a conditional building permit agreement. Analysis and Options: Necessity of a Master Servicing Strategy prior to Building Permit In accordance with the Planning Act, S.24(1) where an Official Plan is in effect, no public work shall be undertaken, and with few exceptions, no bylaw passed for any purpose that does not conform with the Official Plan. The City’s Official Plan (5.2.1.1) indicates that development will be permitted in areas that can be adequately serviced. Site Plan Approval has been granted, with conditions by Council’s delegate. In order to support Site Plan Approval, a condition of approval requires a Master Servicing Agreement before issuance of a building permit to comply with the Official Plan and ensure City Council and the BGCDSB are committed to establishing an approach to service the lands and provide access and recover certain costs for the developer prior to development commencing. The BGCDSB is prepared to construct roads and servicing infrastructure that will benefit future development in the Sydenham Heights Planning Area at no small expense. The Cost Recovery Agreement will provide the BGCDSB with some assurance of the City’s support for the servicing strategy, cost sharing, and recovery. Master Servicing Strategy (see Attachment 1) Throughout the duration of this process, the applicant team has also been making submissions to the external agencies (including MTO and Grey County) and the City for approval of off-site work. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 7 of 14 Page 89 of 304 In summary, the off-site works include: Watermain In accordance with the Official Plan and the East Owen Sound Master Servicing Strategy, the East Hill pressure zone water main will be extended: from its current terminus east on 8th Street East to 28th Avenue East; from 28th Avenue East north to 15th Street East; along 15th Street East; north of 15th Street East to provide an interconnection with the existing Industrial trunk main, on 28th Avenue East, north of 16th Street East. Sanitary Sewer The sanitary service outlet for the school requires infrastructure extension through the 15th Street East Road allowance to connect to the trunk sanitary sewer constructed in the Rail Trail property to service this area of the City. New 15th Street East Road and Intersection with 28th Avenue East and Turning Lanes on 28th Avenue East Turning lanes will be constructed on 28th Avenue East in accordance with the Traffic Impact Study. A new, stop-controlled 15th Street East local road and sidewalk (south side) will be constructed by the school to a bulb, with future construction of the remaining portion of 15th Street East to be paid by the school under the Consent Agreement. Pedestrian path from the bulb to the Rail Trail in the 15th Street East right of way to connect with the County rail trail, including a gate at each end to deter motorized vehicle access. Pedestrian Connections In addition to the pedestrian connection in the 15th Street East right of way, there will be a temporary pedestrian connection across the commercial lands to the north to connect to 16th Street East and the sidewalk located along that road. The Consent Agreement with the BGCDSB and the owner of the commercial lands to the north provides for the construction of a municipal sidewalk along both 28th Avenue East and 16th Street East at the time of construction of the commercial development. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 8 of 14 Page 90 of 304 The financial contribution is outlined in Staff Report CR-26-057 regarding the tender award for the pedestrian tunnel and associated works. Stormwater Management Among the conditions of Site Plan Approval are amendments to the stormwater management plan for the lands. The details for any off-site storm works are not finalized and will be addressed as part of a further Servicing Agreement for that phase of works. Attachment 1 summarizes the Off-Site Works necessary to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and to supply municipal water and sanitary services and stormwater management required for the school to function. This attachment outlines the various parties to the Agreements that will be required for the off-site works, as well as a high-level cost estimate and the financial contributions required by the City. Although this agreement is delegated to staff to authorize, the City does have some financial contributions that are included in the five-year capital budget, and Council is being made aware of these costs. The City’s financial contribution is limited to: Pressure reducing valve for the interconnection of the industrial and East Hill and five (5) watermain service laterals along 8th Street East for existing properties. This work will be completed by the BGCDSB and paid for by the City, based on actual costs with an upset limit. The City has a planned capital budget ($250,000) for these items. Sidewalk connection along 16th Street East from the east side of the pedestrian tunnel. The City is currently undertaking an upgrade to the pedestrian tunnel beneath 16th Street East at the crossing of the Rail Trail. As part of this work, a sidewalk connection along the 16th Street East road allowance to the east is planned (approximately 140 metres), where it will connect with a temporary north-south pedestrian connection from the school. This sidewalk is required by the Consent Agreement (GY270643) registered on title with the commercial lands north of the school. In order to advance this, and ensure pedestrian connectivity, the City will front-end these costs and recover 100 per cent of these costs (estimated at $363,307 in 2026 dollars) from the commercial developer under the existing Consent Agreement. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 9 of 14 Page 91 of 304 A Master Servicing Strategy will outline the overall strategy for servicing with subsequent staff-delegated Servicing Agreements as the mechanism for the City to outline the responsibilities of the Applicant and make financial arrangements for the design, installation, and construction of each phase and component of off-site works. A condition of site plan approval requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, “… a Master Servicing Agreement has been entered into with the City of Owen Sound to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and Director of Public Works and Engineering”. Staff has the authority to execute agreements under Section 41 of the Planning Act relating to site plan approval. Capital Cost Recovery – Watermain It is a policy of the City’s Official Plan (4.2.8) that within the Sydenham Heights Planning Area, new development shall be responsible for the cost of upgrades to existing infrastructure. The Consent Agreement registered on title with these lands notes that the cost of the extension of municipal services, including detailed design and construction, shall be completed at the sole effect and expense of the land owner, and the City agrees to make best efforts to recover costs from the benefiting parties to the extension of municipal services, including but not limited to neighbouring properties. The Planning Act provides municipalities with the authority to enter into agreements with respect to capital works. In this case, the installation of the water main is to be recovered from several benefiting properties. Based on the alignment of the water main extension, eleven (11) properties have been identified for future capital cost recovery, based on the area of developable land for each property. Attachment 2 illustrates the properties identified for cost recovery at the time of future development. The overall apportioned cost to be recovered at the time of future development is estimated at 9-10 per cent. The contribution is based on land area of each property, excluding hazard lands. Engineering Services staff will finalize the details of this agreement once detailed costing is available based on this strategy. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 10 of 14 Page 92 of 304 Council is requested to direct staff to bring forward a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Capital Cost Recovery Agreement between the City and the BGCDSB. Conditional Building Permit Agreement Based on conditions imposed by the Province, the BGCDSB is anxious to receive a building permit so that the building construction can proceed to tender. To allow the finalization of certain conditions of site plan approval and the finalization of the Master Servicing and Capital Cost Recovery Agreements, Council is requested to authorize the execution of a Conditional Building Permit Agreement under the Building Code Act. This agreement has been prepared by the City Solicitor, who also prepared the Consent Agreement for this project. The agreement will permit construction of the building only and not other site works under the site plan or servicing agreements. Until these other agreements are in place, the Conditional Building Permit Agreement, will among other matters, ensure that provisions relating to the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) are implemented in the building construction. Area Specific Development Charges The City has previously calculated an area-specific development charge (ASDC) to recover wastewater capital works that benefit the Sydenham Heights Planning Area; the full rationale and calculation are provided in Appendix D of the Development Charges Background Study. The capital works required to extend wastewater services to Sydenham Heights have been completed, and the related costs have been funded by the City, with future development charge collections intended to repay the resulting debt. Under provincial legislation, school boards are statutorily exempt from paying development charges; accordingly, the new Catholic school would otherwise have been liable for the Sydenham Heights ASDC but is not required to remit that charge. Based on the floor area, the estimated ASDC is estimated at $111,000. Staff recommends using wastewater rate revenues (rather than leaving the legislated exemption uncollected) to make a corresponding credit against the outstanding debt associated with the Sydenham Heights servicing works. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 11 of 14 Page 93 of 304 This will ensure recovery of the debt incurred to extend wastewater servicing to the area. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The City will pay a small amount of the overall water main capital cost relating to the pressure-reducing valve and lateral connections. These costs are in the City’s five-year capital plan and are estimated not to exceed $250,000. Payment will be made under the agreement, with upset limits based on actual costs. Through the Capital Cost Recovery Agreement, the developer will pay for the upfront costs of the water service required to support the development. The City will commit to best efforts to recover the costs of the water main extension as identified. The BGCDSB and the future developer of the commercial lands to the north have financial obligations relating to other servicing infrastructure that are addressed in the Consent Agreement. The estimated area-specific development charges that would be collected if this use were not exempt are estimated at $111,000. Human Resources A significant investment in staff time has been made to this project by the City’s Development Team, including the Directors. Time and Scheduling Staff are and have been working with the BGCDSB to meet the timing obligations of the construction season and Ministerial funding. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: The recommendation supports both the City's Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan and the City's Climate Mitigation Plan. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 12 of 14 Page 94 of 304 The applicant has considered environmental impact in their design. Of particular note, the development: Has revised plans to a 3-storey building reducing the development footprint. Incorporates EV parking and provides one space fully equipped for charging (not mandatory). Incorporates natural plantings, habitat protection, and native species. Includes off-site compensation for on-site habitat loss. Maintains unhealthy butternut trees that could otherwise be removed in recognition that they can be used for environmental education. Provides for active transportation and is on full municipal services. Communication and Engagement: Staff have been meeting regularly with the applicant team to discuss progress and clarify processes throughout the review of this application. Staff anticipates continued and ongoing communication with the applicant team at least until detailed design and all Site Plan and Servicing Agreements are fully executed. Throughout the duration of this process, the applicant team has also been making submissions to the external agencies noted above for approval of Off-Site works. As needed, staff will support the applicant’s applications to other approval bodies (such as GSCA, MTO, and County of Grey) and work to ensure that the approvals are consistent amongst approval bodies. Report Developed in Consultation With: This report and project approvals have been developed in consultation with the City’s Development Team. Attachments: 1. Summary of Off-Site Works – Master Servicing Strategy 2. Lands Identified to be Subject to Future Capital Cost Recovery Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 13 of 14 Page 95 of 304 Reviewed by: Margaret Potter, Senior Planner Mason Bellamy, Manager of Public Works and Engineering Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Pamela Coulter, Director of Community Services at pcoulter@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1252. Staff Report CS-26-045: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) – Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit Page 14 of 14 Page 96 of 304 Attachment 1 Summary of Off-Site Works – Master Servicing Strategy A Master Servicing Agreement(s) is contemplated as the appropriate mechanism to outline the responsibilities of the Applicant and make financial arrangements with the City for the design, installation, and construction of the off-site works and when certain works are required in relationship to the on-site works (school development). More detailed Servicing Agreements that are staff delegated will be required to implement the Master Servicing Agreement as additional information and costs are available. This table provides a high-level summary of the off-site works that have been identified to date for inclusion in the Master Servicing Agreement(s). A Capital Cost Sharing Agreement(s) is contemplated as the appropriate mechanism to outline allocations for best-efforts cost recovery for the costs to be borne by the applicant, the City, any other approval authority, and any future development and authorize the signing of the related agreements. The Consent Agreement (GY270643) contemplated many of the items listed herein. Note in reference to the Consent Agreement that the “Applicant” is the Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) and the “severed” lot is the school site. Consent agreement excerpts shall be considered “in summary” and the actual agreement consulted for specific wording. Clause 7a) notes that prior to the construction, installation and/or provision of site works, site plan approval is required, including the execution of a servicing agreement. Reference to the agreement is made throughout this table. Clause 7b) the Applicant agrees to construct necessary road improvements as applicable and detailed design and construction shall be at the sole effort and expense of the Applicant. Clause 7c) deals with future construction of the north-south road including provision for certain works and/or capital contributions. Clause 7d) notes that the Applicant agrees to provide a year-round active transportation connection to the County Rail Trail with design and construction at the sole effort and expense of the Applicant. [Note through discussions with County staff and the applicant the specified pedestrian route has been revised]. The applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the design, approvals process, and construction of all the Off-Site Works necessary for the development of the school to proceed. ST2025-018 1 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 97 of 304 The Consent Agreement notes that the cost of the extension of municipal services, including detailed design and construction, shall be completed at their sole effect and expense and the City agrees to make best efforts to recover costs from the benefiting parties to the extension of municipal services, including but not limited to neighbouring properties. It is noted that the design of the off-site works has not been reviewed in detail as a part of Site Plan Approval and will be required as a part of the Servicing Agreement(s) noted below. Furthermore, the works proposed as a part of this project are in the care and control of various parties [i.e. Grey County, Grey Sauble Conservation Authority (GSCA), Ministry of Transportation (MTO), etc.], and the anticipated parties responsible for approval of select works are listed in the table below. The comments provided herein do not preclude the applicant’s responsibility for meeting all applicable laws, regulations, or standards. The costs of off-site works and associated cost estimates have not been detailed or reviewed by City staff and may be subject to change. The City’s contributions will, however, have upset limits and be based on actual costs. Depending on the nature and location of the proposed off-site works, additional study may be warranted with respect to environmental, cultural, transportation or other impacts necessitating additional study. These requirements cannot be confirmed until location, alignment, and detailed design of certain works is confirmed. The following summary is based on the information available at this time. Location/Item 1. Watermain 8th Street & 28th Avenue East; Crossing 16th Street East; 15th Street East Process Anticipated Approval Authorities for Design Anticipated Parties to the Necessary Agreements Agreement between the Owner and the City anticipated. City Two agreements: County County will require Municipal Consent and Work-inRight-of-way permit (not agreement). MTO 1. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for construction 2. MTO and City of Owen Sound for encroachment of municipal infrastructure into Highway 26 MTO Encroachment Permit required within Highway 26 property limits. Agreement between the MTO and the City is an MTO requirement for the intersection crossing at 28th Avenue East/16th Street East. ST2025-018 2 of 9 GSCA 2753 15th Street East BGCDSB Share City Share Capital Recovery Share 100% BGCDSB $250,000 City upset limit for PRV and laterals Cost recovery from future development lands Page 98 of 304 MTO Building and Land Use Permit anticipated for work in permit control area. Design Related County Road Work restoration related to watermain works 2. Extension of the City’s watermain from the existing terminus along 8th Street East (southwest of 1800 8th Street East – East Hill Pressure Zone) and connecting to the existing terminus at the intersection of 28th Avenue East and 17th Street East (Industrial Pressure Zone). As part of the Municipal Consent and Work-in-ROW Permit anticipate stipulations requiring restoration to pre-existing conditions. 28th Street Improvements at/near intersection of 15th Street East Tri-Party Agreement between Owner, City, and Grey City County and Road Entrance Permit required. County MTO is reviewing design and will advise of permits. MTO MTO Building and Land Use Permit anticipated. GSCA GSCA permits required for work in regulated area. Design Consent Agreement Clause 7b) in summary, the Applicant agrees to construct any required road improvements to 28th Avenue East required to facilitate the development at the sole effort and expense of the applicant at the time of Site Plan Approval. Widening near 15th Street East intersection for northbound left turn lane and parallel lane. Widening north of 15th Street East intersection for southbound right turn lane into 15th Street East. Widening south of 15th Street East intersection for southbound acceleration lane on 28th Avenue East. ST2025-018 3 of 9 BGCDSB 100% BGCDSB City County 2753 15th Street East Page 99 of 304 Conceptually designed. County staff report PDR-CW-51-25 was considered by County Council on September 11, supporting the request from MTO regarding intersection configuration and for a staff report to be brought back regarding speed limit. Design of 28th Avenue East may be revised based on County decision for design speed (i.e. 80-90100 km/hr design speeds). Improvements governed by TIS approved as a part of Zoning Bylaw Amendment. Related 15th Street East Work entrance to 28th Avenue East Anticipated to be part of 28th Avenue East improvements as indicated above; County exemption for easternmost driveway access to 15th Street East required due to proximity to intersection. Culvert underneath 15th Street East at 28th Avenue East. Related Stormwater Work Management in County Road Allowance 3. 15th Street East Road Construction (28th Street East to the Bulb) The County does not have a Consolidated Linear Infrastructure Environmental Compliance Approval (CLI ECA). An ECA application is to be prepared by the consultant and approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) for any stormwater management in the road allowance (to be County owned). Pre-grading – approved and underway MECP City County GSCA City BGCDSB County City 100% BGCDSB MTO ST2025-018 4 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 100 of 304 Road construction to urban cross section will require Servicing Agreement with the City of Owen sound. GSCA BGCDSB also to make capital contribution for westerly part of road per Consent Agreement SWM and wastewater to be in accordance with City’s CLI ECA MTO Building and Land Use Permit anticipated for work in permit control area. GSCA permit required for work in regulated area. Related Actual travelled Work road Consent Agreement Clause 7a) contemplates the Applicant constructing the E/W road (Parts 1, 3, 6) including a 1.5m sidewalk on the south side, terminating in the Temporary Turn Around Bulb as part of future development, with detailed design and construction to be at the sole effort and expense of the Applicant at the time of Site Plan Approval. OSS Standard (OSS-100B with infrastructure within asphalt as per OSS-100C) – sidewalk only on south side of the road at this time. o Stormwater to be located under curb. Temporary Bulb – refer to Consent Agreement GY270643, School to pay capital contribution for missing link (from the bulb to western terminus, future alignment of north/south road) – potential location to be recommended by Engineering Consultant for an estimate of works. Site Access into 15th Street East (three vehicle connections + MUP to W athletic field). ST2025-018 5 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 101 of 304 The details of the approved TIS are to remain in force and effect upon the design of 15th Street East and improvements required to 28th Avenue East. Should any significant changes be proposed to the design contemplated in the TIS, then a new TIS or qualified person’s opinion may be required. 4. MUP (15th Street East bulb to Rail Trail) within City property Agreement between the Owner and the City anticipated. City Two agreements: County Agreement between the City and the County anticipated. GSCA 1. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for construction. 2. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for long term maintenance as constitutes access to athletic field. MTO Building and Land Use Permit anticipated for work in permit control area. MTO GSCA permit required for work in regulated area. Design A paved multi-use path (MUP) doubling as EMS access is proposed. See Active Transportation Plan submitted by applicant. No winter maintenance is proposed. City This will remain City property, the school will be constructing sanitary sewer and MUP. GSCA 100% BGCDSB County MTO An agreement to undertake these works will be separate from Road works. The City will encourage the BGCDSB to undertake all works that require trail closure at one time (1 trail closure) if possible. The City has an existing agreement (By-law No. 2017-072) with the County respecting the sanitary sewer. ST2025-018 6 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 102 of 304 Related Connection to Work Sanitary 5. MUP connection to existing Rail Trail within County property Agreement between City and County for sanitary sewer installation from 2017 does consider future connections. The County does not have a permitting process for work affecting the Rail Trail. City Two agreements: County The City will enter into an agreement with the BGCDSB for the construction of this work which may be combined with other servicing agreement components. A separate MOU with the BGCDSB may also be warranted for ongoing maintenance (See 4 above). GSCA 1. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for construction. 2. City of Owen Sound and County of Grey for construction (may be included with above, if required). MTO As the owner of the MUP, the City will enter into an agreement with the County of Grey for connection and ongoing maintenance, if needed. 100% BGCDSB Design will be approved as part of overall MUP works but will require specific agreements for this connection component. 6. Sanitary Sewer Extension Agreement between the Owner and the City anticipated. City Two agreements: County MTO Building and Land Use Permit anticipated for work in permit control area. GSCA 1. Existing City of Owen Sound with County of Grey for sanitary sewer in Rail Trail. 2. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for construction. GSCA permit required for work in regulated area. MTO 100% BGCDSB The wastewater main constructed in 15th Street East, from the Rail Trail to fronting the school building, is to extend as far east as possible within the road allowance to support a perpendicular connection into the building. ST2025-018 7 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 103 of 304 7. Pedestrian Connectivity to 16th Street East Appropriate sizing for the wastewater main/extending along 15th Street East for future development to the north is required. Cost recovery for the appropriate sizing of the wastewater main is to be detailed in the Capital Cost Recovery Agreement. Localized connection of wastewater infrastructure within the Rail Trail (existing main) will require County approval. The SFS is to include an assessment for lands to the north to inform design limits within 15th Street East (i.e. wastewater main sizing, extending east for a future connection to the north). Comply with the City’s CLI-ECA for wastewater. Updated Active Transportation Plan to outline intended alignment (Site Plan Stage). City Two agreements: Detailed design to the satisfaction of all approval authorities including EIS and Archaeological Study updates as required. County GSCA 1. BGCDSB and City of Owen Sound for construction. 2. City of Owen Sound and Neighbouring Property Owner (easement and maintenance). Servicing Agreement with the City of Owen Sound for works in the road allowance. Any and all permits required from external agencies at the sole responsibility and expense of the BGCDSB. MTO SON 100% BGCDSB The proposed alignment requires a City Easement across lands to the north (temporary MUP) until future road constructed: ST2025-018 8 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 104 of 304 8. Missing piece of sidewalk from rail trail for pedestrian connectivity along 16th Street East (approximately 140 m) Temporary (though that could be many years) asphalt MUP until future road is constructed). Would require establishment of easement across lands to the north in favour of the City (see Consent Agreement excerpt in B1). As a City easement, the City would be responsible for snow clearing. This area is not a City road allowance at this time and was not subject of detailed studies undertaken for ZBA 56. A pathway here would require consideration of environmental and natural heritage (EIS), as well as cultural (archaeological study) impacts to determine appropriate route. Terms of Reference for these studies should be developed in advance of submission for review and acceptance by the City and appropriate agencies. Lighting/security to be considered. Options to deter trespass to be considered. Emergency access to be considered. This work is being included in Tender RFT-26-004 City – engineering consultant Consent Agreement $363,307 (100%) frontended by City of Owen Sound. 100% capital cost recovery by commercial developer owing to city at time of commercial development per Consent Agreement GY270643. ST2025-018 9 of 9 2753 15th Street East Page 105 of 304 Attachment 2: Lands Identified to be Subject to Future Capital Cost Recovery ± 20th Ave E 17th St E 16th St E 1 Rail T rail 2 3 7 6 5 28th Ave E 4 8th St E 12 9 8 0 90 180 10 360 Meters Superior St 11 ID ROLLNUMBER ID ROLLNUMBER 1 425904006501000 7 425904006505000 2 425904006500100 8 425904007511000 3 BGCDSB Lands 9 425904007512000 4 425904006000100 10 425904007000100 5 425904006506000 11 425904007001000 425904006505100 Page 106 of 304 12 425904007002000 6 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Lauren Stewart, Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-057 Subject: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-057 respecting the Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation, City Council: 1. Awards the above-noted tender to E.C. King Contracting - A Division of Miller Paving Limited, the lowest compliant bid received for $2,455,822.92, including the non-refundable allocation of HST; and 2. Approves the budget allocation to front-end the sidewalk costs attributable to adjacent developers, to be recovered from those developments at the time of their approval; and 3. Directs staff to bring forward a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement. Highlights: The project was approved in the 2026-2030 Multi-Year Capital Plan. The Connecting Link Grant will be the main source for the taxsupported components of this project. The construction period is estimated to begin June 2026, with a substantial completion date of October 2026. Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 1 of 9
10.b Report CR-26-057 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering and the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re
The pedestrian tunnel on the Grey County CP Rail Trail requires urgent rehabilitation due to water and chloride penetration causing concrete spalling, posing increasing health and safety risks to users who hike, run, cycle, and snowmobile. The structure also serves as a critical culvert for a 100-year storm event, supporting both the trail and the 16th Street East arterial road. Engineering design and approvals are scheduled for 2025/2026, with construction planned for 2027, potentially eligible for up to 90% Connecting Link grant funding. The project aims to maintain safe public trail use and infrastructure integrity while managing traffic impacts during construction.
Page 107 of 304 Subsequent to the previous capital plan approval, the new Catholic High School has progressed sufficiently to determine that pedestrian connectivity to the commercial area is required and would be most cost-effective to be incorporated as part of this project. As such, road platform widening and sidewalk were included in the scope of the tender. Staff are seeking approval for Council to allocate funding for this pedestrian infrastructure, until it can be recovered from the benefitting developments east and west of the recreational trail. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: Report OP-23-044 – Connecting Link Intake 9 Grant Application Approval The project mentioned above was approved in the 2026-2030 Multi-Year Capital Plan. Background: In accordance with the City’s Procurement of Goods, Services, Construction, and Consulting Policy (By-law No. 2020-002), the award of all purchases above $250,000 must be approved by Council. This report has been drafted to provide Council with the necessary information to approve the award of Tender RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation. The capital detail sheet describing the project is attached to this report. Analysis and Options: This pedestrian tunnel is for the multi-use Grey County CP Rail Trail and serves as the culvert for a 100-year storm event in the West Telfer Creek Branch watercourse. There is also a low-flow stormwater culvert east of this location. The pedestrian tunnel is showing signs of water and chlorides (from Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 2 of 9 Page 108 of 304 road salt) penetration, resulting in concrete spalling in the tunnel soffit (ceiling). The 2024 updated Inspection Report indicates that this tunnel requires a new membrane to be installed on top of the structure, together with repairs to the deteriorated sections of the tunnel. A significant portion of the rehabilitation cost may be related to traffic management on Highway 26/16th Street East during construction, depending on the type of repair/rehabilitation. As stated in the Capital Detail Sheet, during the project's design phase, other repair or rehabilitation techniques will be investigated. Design Changes While the original intent of the project was to address the condition of the structural culvert, shortly before the request for proposal was released, it became apparent that the new Catholic High School would be built to the southeast of the site, and therefore, pedestrian links would be necessary in the near future. Furthermore, in order to execute the rehabilitation, the entire road platform must be stripped, so if any widening is desired, it is the perfect opportunity for that. In light of these factors, staff included the assessment of a suitable pedestrian corridor option within the tasks required of the successful consultant. Several options were reviewed. Notably, a sidewalk alignment at the level of the road over the culvert (16th Street level), and an option that brought the sidewalk down to the level of the recreational trail. The option chosen as the most viable is the deck-level sidewalk. The trail-level option was ruled out for two primary reasons: Transitioning the sidewalk down the slope to the trail would require a switchback configuration that would not conform to accessibility standards. Grey County has prohibited the recreational trail from being maintained for pedestrians during the winter, as it is used as a snowmobile trail. However, there are several concessions to installing the pedestrian corridor along the deck level. The biggest compromise is that some widening of the road platform will be required, incurring additional cost. Even then, it will not be financially viable to widen the road enough to allow a trail-width corridor Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 3 of 9 Page 109 of 304 or achieve ideal separation between the road edge and the pedestrian corridor. Specifically, instead of a trail (3 metre width) along the top of the culvert, only a sidewalk can be provided. To add the sidewalk links, an additional 1 metre width of asphalt and granular material along the length of the curb was also allocated to the costs of each respective development’s share to be recovered. The City’s project will resurface the entire lane, but for a realistic and reasonable approach to cost apportionment, the amount required to extend the road platform only will be passed on as a future cost to the developers. Based on the limits of the construction site, the proportionate costs to each party were as follows: West Development– 200m of Road (of 390m) = 50% of Shareable Costs Culvert Rehabilitation– 50m of Road (of 390m) = 13% of Shareable Cost East Development– 140m of Road (of 390m) = 37% of Shareable Costs Based on the percentages noted above, costs were divided for the following items: Site Mobilization and Demobilization o Traffic Control and Signage o City portion is 50% given the extra expenses related to protecting hydro poles adjacent to the structure excavation. Excavation and Grading o City portion is 50% due to the scale of road disruption of the tunnel work versus the sidewalks. Environmental Protection Utility Locating and Protecting o more as the cost of the tunnel rehabilitation was higher than the roadway widening work. Costs divided based on estimated quantities. Removal and disposal of south guiderail. Segmental block retaining wall. Installation of new catchbasins. Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 4 of 9 Page 110 of 304 Granular B and Granular A placement. Concrete curb and gutter. Steel beam guiderail installation. Concrete sidewalks. Topsoil and sodding. Material testing/contingency. o Each party has a proportionate share of contingency. Lastly, the entire list of quantities was reviewed for economies, and it was determined that the tunnel interior painting, valued at approximately $184,185, will be removed through a post-award change order to reduce the overall project cost. Scope of Work The scope of this project consists of the rehabilitation of the 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel located over the Grey County CPR Rail Trail, and the roadway widening of 16th Street East for a new south sidewalk expansion. In summary, the project includes: Removing existing asphalt and deteriorated materials to expose and repair the structure. Patching concrete and adding a new distribution slab with waterproofing protection. Installing safety and protection measures such as traffic control, temporary barriers, and a new guiderail system. Reconstructing and widening the south embankment, including new granular base, sidewalk, curb, boulevard, and drainage. Adding erosion control and a retaining wall for stability. Final paving with new asphalt across the roadway. Staff retained Pearson Engineering Ltd. as the consultant to complete the project’s design, including engineering administration and inspection services in November 2025. The construction tender was posted in compliance with the City’s Purchasing By-law on April 2, 2026, and closed on April 29, 2026; two (2) compliant bids were received. Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 5 of 9 Page 111 of 304 The bids received, including the non-refundable allocation of HST, are as follows: Company Name Bid Price E.C. King Contracting - A Division of Miller Paving Limited $2,455,822.92 1001492321 Ontario Ltd. o/a BBC Construction $2,601,219.65 The tender submission from E.C. King Contracting - A Division of Miller Paving Limited is the lowest compliant Bidder and is recommended for Tender Award by Pearson Engineering Ltd. and the City. The tender includes a $120,000 contingency allowance for any unforeseen conditions during the construction period and a $30,000 material testing allowance. The contingency allowance shall not be expended without the City’s written consent. The construction period has a substantial completion date of October 30, 2026. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The approved budget for the construction component of this project is $1,122,246 plus a $167,192 contingency allowance (total of $1,289,438). The updated cost estimates, based on the recommended bid submission, including the non-refundable allocation of HST, are as follows: Item Budget Funding Required Variance Construction including Contingencies $1,289,438 $2,455,823 $1,166,385 Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 6 of 9 Page 112 of 304 The updated funding based on the awarded design/engineering and the recommended bid submission, including the non-refundable allocation of HST is as follows: Description Approved Funding Required Funding Variance Tax-Supported $128,944 $419,829 $290,885 Connecting Link Grant $1,160,494 $1,160,494 $0 To be reimbursed through future Developer Contribution $0 $875,500 $875,500 Total $1,289,438 $2,455,823 $1,166,385 Of the total Tax Supported Variance, $184,185 will be adjusted through a post award change order reducing the tax funded variance to $106,700. The remaining tax funded overage will be funded by the capital reserve as part of the 2026 capital program. The project bears extra cost for the sidewalk links between the bridge and Heritage Grove Plaza and the bridge and where the Catholic School Board will build a walkway north to 16th Street East. These will be recoverable from the adjacent developers at the time of development. The Sydenham Square development referred to as the “West Development” (west of the recreational trail), will be responsible for $512,192 in 2026 dollars. It is anticipated that this portion of the front ending amount will be recovered within five years. The future development on the northern portion of the land the school was severed from referred to as the “East Development” will owe $363,307 in 2026 dollars. It is unknown at this time when the East Development will proceed. For clarity, the total being front-ended by the City would be $875,500 including non-refundable HST. At this time, it is recommended that any available balance in the City’s sidewalk and concrete capital contribution reserve be applied to the front ending amount to be recovered at the time development moves forward. The remaining amount is recommended to be funded from the 2027 asphalt and concrete rehabilitation program which is Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 7 of 9 Page 113 of 304 funded by Canada Community Building Fund (Federal Gas Tax). This remaining amount is estimated to be $575,500. Human Resources The Purchasing and Claims Coordinator is responsible for preparing, developing, coordinating, awarding, and executing all phases of bid opportunities, including Requests for Tenders, Quotations, Proposals, and Non-Standard Procurement. Additionally, the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator is responsible for issuing Purchase Orders when necessary. Relevant department heads or their delegates are responsible for preparing scopes of work, specifications, and managing internal communication related to procurement requirements. Time and Scheduling This project has a substantial completion date of October 30, 2026. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: The above-noted tender was posted on the City’s Bids and Tenders webpage on April 2, 2026, in compliance with the City’s Purchasing By-law to be accessible to all potential bidders. The City will communicate any impacts and closures to the public during the construction period, including road closures. Report Developed in Consultation With: Pearson Engineering Ltd. Manager of Public Works and Engineering Manager of Corporate Services Engineering Technologist Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 8 of 9 Page 114 of 304 Attachments: Capital Detail Sheet 25P.13 Reviewed by: Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Jason Hoffman, Manager of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering at lwiddifield@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 1201. Staff Report CR-26-057: Award of RFT-26-004 – 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation Page 9 of 9 Page 115 of 304 Engineering - 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation 25P.13 Rationale Strategic Plan Alignment Estimated Useful Life (years): Future Replacement Cost: CAP-26-0029 Asset Management - Renewal / Rehabilitation Safe City 50 Year: 2025 Priority Score: 58.20 Priority Level: High - Score 49-69 Department: Public Works and Engineering Staff Contact: Sofin Lalani Location/Coordinates: Description: 25P.13 This pedestrian tunnel is for the multi-use Grey County CP Rail Trail but also serves as the culvert for a 100 year storm event in the West Telfer Creek Branch water course. There is a low-flow storm water culvert east of this location as well. The pedestrian tunnel is showing signs of water and chlorides (from road salt) penetration resulting in concrete spalling in the tunnel soffit (ceiling). The 2024 updated Inspection Report indicates that this tunnel requires a new membrane to be installed on top of the structure together with repairs to the deteriorated sections of the tunnel. A significant portion of the rehabilitation cost may be related to management of traffic for Highway 26/16th St E during construction, depending on the type of repair/rehabilitation. During the design phase of the project, other repair or rehabilitation techniques will be investigated. Engineering design and approvals would be completed in 2025/2026 with construction planned in 2027. As this structure is on the Highway 26 Connecting Link, engineering design, construction and project administration costs may be eligible for up to 90% Connecting Link (CL) grant funding, to a project maximum eligible cost of $3,000,000. Please note that in-house staff costs are not funding eligible. Once the repair and rehabilitation technique is identified and designed, a detailed construction cost estimate can be prepared. A submission for CL funding has been submitted to MTO based on the preliminary estimate indicated on this project detail sheet. It is noted that the project construction cost identified is very preliminary and is subject to the selection of an appropriate rehabilitation technique. The project may be delayed, subject to receiving CL grant funding. 10% of the total eligible costs plus all In-house Engineering (City staff) costs are the City's responsibility. An application has been submitted for Intake 10 Connecting funding starting in 2025 through 2027 inclusive (with all eligible costs submitted by 31 March 2028). Cash Flow Projection: Consulting including Design & Studies In House Engineering Communication / Signage Construction / Contractor Materials Equipment Purchases Contingency Total 2025 2026 2027 $48,545.00 $48,545.00 $86,293.00 $6,000.00 $1,122,246.00 $48,545.00 $48,545.00 $167,192.00 $1,381,731.00 Costs Incurred to 2024 Year End Impact on Operating Budget: Total Project Budget: $1,478,821.00 Schedule: Construction Start Date: Substantial Completion or Purchase Date: 01/01/2025 12/31/2027 Page 116 of 304 Funding Sources: Tax Levy Grant Total $153,282.00 $1,325,539.00 $1,478,821.00 Page 117 of 304 Engineering - 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation 25P.13 Justification for Matrix Values People Health & Safety Score Legislation Score Asset Management Score Operational Performance Score Project Readiness (Resourcing) Score Environment Score Socio-Economic Factors Score Aesthetic Value Score Strategic Plan Score Public Input Score CAP-26-0029 Score 0 - 5 How many people will be directly impacted by the project? What is the risk to the health and safety of the public or Staff if the project does not proceed? Is the project required for legislative/regulatory compliance? Is the project a high priority for replacement in the asset management plan? If the project proceeds (or fails to proceed), what will be the impact on operational performance? Comment on any impact on operating costs, staff time and maintenance. How many resources are ready? Financial resources, Human resources, Scheduling feasibility, Technology/resources. Environment ScoreDoes the project address needs impacted by climate change? To what degree does the project support diversity and inclusion initiatives? To what degree is the aesthetic value of the asset improved? Does the project help to meet a Key Result in the Strategic Plan? Has the project been identified through public engagement? 5 4 4 3 1 Year: 2025 Priority Score: 58.20 Justification / Rationale for Rating This trail is used in all seasons for hiking, running, cycling and snowmobiling. This structure also is supporting the 16th St E road. The level of risk is increasing for health and safety leading to possible injury. Inspection of bridges and Culverts (tunnel) are legislatively required biannually. This asset is showing signs of failure and delayed maintenance may cause increased costs in the future. This tunnel also supports storm water and waste water (trunk sewer) infrastructure. This project will provide little improvement to operational performance. 4 This project may be eligible for future Connecting Link funding (Highway 26). 1 This project has little to no impact on the natural environment. 4 1 This project will maintain the safe use of a public trail and a vital Arterial Road (Highway 26/16th St E). This project will have little aesthetic value 1 This project will help support a core service delivery 2 This project has been mentioned in terms of the current state of the tunnel's condition verbally by the public Page 118 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: OP-26-031 Subject: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-031 respecting the next steps for the 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street), City Council directs staff to proceed with the detailed design of Option 1A – Status Quo with Modernization, to support preparation of construction tender documents for issuance in advance of the 2027 construction season. Highlights: The 4th Avenue West Reconstruction project remains a priority infrastructure renewal project focused primarily on the replacement of aging underground utilities that are at or beyond their useful lives. Staff proposed Option 3, with a multi-use path and narrowed road cross-section, as the option that best meets the community’s needs for a comparable cost. At the April 27 Council meeting, Council deferred construction of the project to 2027. While additional design work and cost will be required to advance Option 1A (Status Quo with Modernization), a portion of the engineering completed to date can continue to be used, particularly related to the underground infrastructure design. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 1 of 8
10.c Report OP-26-031 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps
City staff are requesting Council direction to finalize detailed designs for the Fourth Avenue West reconstruction ahead of the 2027 construction window, aiming to update aging underground utilities. Although a multi-use path option was previously deferred, staff highlight Option 1A as the standard reconstruction plan, while presenting Option 2A as a cost-effective alternative. Option 2A proposes narrowed road widths that traffic calm speeds and preserve on-street parking, potentially lowering long-term snowplow maintenance costs compared to wider surfaces. This design choice directly addresses resident concerns about speeding and parking, with funding expected entirely from the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund. Simultaneously, the City anticipates seeking Council approval for a traffic by-law amendment to add two short-term parking spaces near the Library, Art Gallery, and Tourism offices, an increase from a single previously considered space, to better serve summer visitors needing quick drop-offs. Staff from Public Works, Engineering, and Finance will coordinate next steps, procurement, and community communication without committing to immediate tendering or proposing a new public information centre unless specifically directed. Further public consultation will proceed regarding the project's timing and specific design details before final approval moves forward.
Page 119 of 304 This report seeks direction to proceed with detailed design development for Option 1A in preparation for tendering and construction. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: A City that Moves – Facilitating sustainable transportation options and creating community connectivity. City Building – Enhancing urban development, planning and placemaking processes to create places and spaces that contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents, and tourists. Green and Resilient City – Strengthening the City’s environmental, social, and economic ability to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis. Also, leveraging the city’s natural resources and infrastructure to support healthy lifestyles. Previous Report/Authority: Reference Document Cited within this report: Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Policy PRT 001. This project has been approved as part of the Capital Program, project 25P.2. The award of the Engineering Contract was approved on September 8, 2025, by Council through Report CR-25-114 “Award of RFP-25-004 Engineering Services for 4th Ave W Reconstruction - 15th St W to 20th St W”. Two Public Information Centres were held on February 3, 2026, and on March 19, 2026. Report OP-26-004 – 4th Ave. West Reconstruction (15th St to 20th St) Preliminary Design Options Presentation by WSP Canada Inc. on recommended alternative – March 19, 2026 Operations Committee meeting The project was presented to the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee on April 17, 2026. No actionable comments were received from the Committee. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 2 of 8 Page 120 of 304 Background: The City is undertaking a full infrastructure reconstruction of 4th Avenue West between 15th Street West and 20th Street West, including replacement of underground water, wastewater, and storm infrastructure as well as road and surface works. The corridor serves an important residential area and provides connectivity to schools, parks, daycares, and the City’s west-side neighbourhoods. Over the course of the project development process, staff and the City’s consultant evaluated several design alternatives, balancing such considerations as accessibility, active transportation, traffic calming, parking, maintenance requirements, lifecycle costs, and neighbourhood connectivity. Public Information Centres and community engagement activities were undertaken to gather feedback from residents and stakeholders. At its meeting held on April 23, 2026, the Operations Committee recommended approval of Option 3, integrating a multi-use path, as the preferred design alternative. Subsequently, at its April 27, 2026, meeting, Council considered the recommendation but did not approve the motion. Council instead approved a motion deferring the project to 2027. As the project is currently at approximately the 60 per cent design stage, further direction from Council is required respecting the preferred option to proceed with before staff can advance an amended detailed design and prepare tender-ready construction documents. This report is intended to obtain that direction to advance the project and maintain readiness for a planned 2027 construction schedule. Analysis and Options: The project has not progressed beyond 60 per cent design completion as staff seek additional clarification from Council. The pre-qualification bid that was underway has been cancelled. This does not mean, however, that the project carries no ongoing cost. The principal motivation for this project is the replacement of aging underground infrastructure at or beyond its expected service life. While significant discussion has occurred respecting the preferred surface configuration and active transportation features, as discussed with Council, Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 3 of 8 Page 121 of 304 the majority of project costs relate to the underground utility replacement, which is required regardless of the final cross-section selected. To minimize wasted effort, time, and cost and maintain alignment with the City’s broader capital planning and procurement timelines, staff are seeking direction to proceed with detailed design development based on Option 1A. 1A was chosen for the recommendation of this report as it seemed to be the most aligned with Council’s opinions at the meeting on April 27. However, as outlined further in this report, an alternative option has been presented which Council may wish to consider, that would reduce the redesign effort and address some of the stated concerns. Advancing detailed design at this stage will allow staff and the consultant to prepare tender-ready drawings and specifications in advance of the 2027 construction season. Proceeding with detailed design does not commit the City to immediate construction tender award; instead, it ensures the project remains positioned to move forward within the available construction window and minimizes the risk of further schedule delays. This approach also enables the refinement of project details through the design process while maintaining progress on the broader infrastructure renewal objectives associated with the corridor. Potential Cross-Section Options path, although the sentiments expressed appeared to convey that impression. As such, staff have removed that option from the list of possible solutions. Staff also do not recommend Option 2, with bicycle lanes, due to the increased pavement width and maintenance burden, and since the priority appeared to be maintaining on-street parking. Bicycle lanes are not compatible with on-street parking in this case. Staff have added another potential option, however, that provides a narrower road for traffic calming but maintains a 1.5m-wide sidewalk on the east side of the road to reduce the impact on front yards and driveways. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 4 of 8 Page 122 of 304 As such, the new options are: Option 1A: “Status Quo with Modernizations” o o o Reconstruction to Existing Road Cross Section and Right-ofWay Layout (one 3.5m wide lane, one 5m wide lane, with onstreet parking, 1.5m sidewalk on both sides) Accessibility and geometric upgrades at corners Pedestrian cross-over (protected crossing) Option 2A: “Traffic Calming Alternative” o o o Reconstruction using 3.5m Lane Width, No Parking, No Bicycle Lanes, 1.5m wide concrete sidewalk on both sides Accessibility and geometric upgrades at corners Pedestrian cross-over (protected crossing) Parking There were some concerns raised around the elimination of on-street parking in favour of a traffic calming cross-section. While it was not given as the primary reason Option 3 was rejected, staff did consider it in drafting this report. In the weeks since the meeting on April 27, casual observations do not suggest that on-street parking is widely used, so Council may still want to consider a reduced width, provided in Option 2A. Traffic Speed While staff are prepared to execute Option 1A, staff would be remiss not to state once more, that leaving such a wide surface on a road with known speeding concerns may lead to increased speeding, both by the differential with which motorists are exceeding the posted speed as well as a larger percentage of vehicles exceeding the limit at all. Go-to options that the public will ask for as traffic calming devices include stop signs and speed bumps. Neither of these solutions are appropriate for this section of road. This is primarily why the constricted road profile was chosen over other designs: to prevent public upset and requests for ineffective or difficult-to-implement traffic-calming measures. Much more explanation on this topic can be found in the City’s adopted Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Policy. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 5 of 8 Page 123 of 304 Operations and Maintenance Option 2A would be superior from the perspective of winter maintenance; one of Council’s noted concerns on April 27. As there would not be on-street parking, even during the day, plows would not have to negotiate around parked cars, if any were present. Due to the smaller sidewalk width, at 1.5m wide rather than 2.7m for the path, in addition to the slightly narrower road, there would be ample snow storage between the curb and the sidewalk. Table 1 – Comparison of Winter Maintenance Advantages Option 1A Pro/Con On-street parking. Plows may have to negotiate around parked cars. Pro Boulevard snow storage. Con Extra-wide lane width; would require a second pass to clear the parking lane. Pro/Con On-street snow storage. Affects on-street parking; can result in vehicles too far into the road if parked when there is a large windrow. Plows can't clear behind parked cars. Option 2A Pro Boulevard snow storage. Pro Extra boulevard snow storage. Pro Easy to plow – one pass each way. Cost Between the two remaining options, Option 2A will have a lower cost, as more of the surface design will be preserved, and it has a narrower road platform. Long-term operational costs will be higher for Option 1A. This is due to the wider pavement; it has more surface area to clear and will have a higher end-of-life and replacement cost. With Option 2A, more sod damage from sidewalk snow removal is likely, as the sidewalk is only nominally wider than the equipment itself. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 6 of 8 Page 124 of 304 Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The project is currently anticipated to be funded entirely through the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF). As previously identified, the majority of the project cost relates to the replacement of the underground water, wastewater, and storm infrastructure, which remains necessary regardless of the preferred surface configuration selected. Proceeding with Option 1A will require additional engineering and design work to revise the surface design and finalize tender-ready documents. However, because a significant portion of the engineering work completed to date relates to underground infrastructure and base corridor design, substantial elements of the existing design work can continue to be leveraged as the project advances. The estimated additional design cost associated with revising and completing the Option 1A detailed design is approximately $15,000-$20,000. As the main difference between the previously proposed design and Option 2A is the width of the pedestrian corridor on the east side of the road, the required redesign effort is minimized. However, there may be additional opportunities to improve the existing design to address conflicts (i.e. utility, tree, etc.) that may have arisen from the extra 1.2m of walkway width in the old design. Both options will have redundant costs, both in staff time and consulting fees, relating to reissuing the prequalification bidding phase and repeating the mid-stages of the detailed design. It is assumed that staff are not required to undertake follow-up notifications with the neighbourhood’s occupants to make them aware of the design changes. As such, those costs have not been considered. Human Resources Staff resources from Public Works and Engineering, Procurement, and Finance will continue to support coordination of detailed design development, procurement preparation, utility coordination, stakeholder communication, and contract administration activities associated with the project. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 7 of 8 Page 125 of 304 Time and Scheduling Subject to Council direction, staff will proceed with detailed design development immediately following approval of this report. The intent is to complete tender-ready documents in sufficient time to support issuance of a construction tender and commencement of construction activities during the 2027 construction season. Climate and Environmental Impacts: The recommendation supports the City's Corporate Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Communication and Engagement: Public engagement and consultation have already formed a significant component of the project development process through Public Information Centres, the project website, and Council and Committee discussions. Further communication respecting project timing, construction impacts, and detailed design elements will continue as the project advances toward tender and construction. Staff do not, however, propose to undertake another Public Information Centre to advertise the final approved design. Should Council wish staff to undertake such an event, direction should be provided, as there will be additional cost implications. Report Developed in Consultation With: Manager of Public Works and Engineering Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Manager of Corporate Services Attachments: None. Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering at lwiddifield@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 1201. Staff Report OP-26-031: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps Page 8 of 8 Page 126 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Aidan Ware, Director and Chief Curator – Art Gallery, Culture, Tourism Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CS-26-040 Subject: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-040 respecting Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking, City Council directs staff to bring forward a by-law to amend Traffic By-law No. 2009-075 to include the designation of two (2) parking spaces adjacent to the Library/Gallery/Tourism for short-term 30minute parking, as outlined in the report. Highlights: On April 27, 2026, City Council approved the continuation of Tourism Services at the Art Gallery. On April 27, 2026, City Council requested a staff report about assigning one (1) parking space adjacent to the Library/Gallery/Tourism as a short-term parking space. Adding two (2) short-term parking spaces for this purpose would better support the Library and Tourism services during the busy summer season when people are coming in for information or dropping off books. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development, planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that Staff Report CS-26-040: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Page 1 of 5
11 Memorandum from the Deputy Clerk Re: River District Board of Management - Revised Constitution
The agenda item presents a memorandum from the Deputy Clerk regarding a revised constitution for the River District Board of Management, though the provided text only lists adjacent reports on school servicing and engineering awards without substantive content on the constitution itself.
11 Memorandum from the Deputy Clerk Re: River District Board of Management - Revised Constitution Memorandum from the Deputy Clerk Re: River District Board of Management - Revised Constitution REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 10.a Report CS-26-045 from the Director of Community Services Re: Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board (BGCDSB) - Overall Servicing Strategy and Conditional Building Permit 10.b Report CR-26-057 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering and the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re: Award of RFT-26-004
11.a Report CS-26-040 from the Director and Chief Curator - Art Gallery, Culture, Tourism Re: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking
To address operational pressures for the Library, Gallery, and Tourism Services, staff propose adding two short-term parking spaces to improve turnover and accessibility before the July/August season. These spaces will be restricted to patrons via new signage and enforced during downtown business hours, avoiding evening or weekend patrols. The initiative requires minimal financial investment for custom signs and leverages existing Public Works and enforcement resources. This practical measure responds to public input regarding cultural facility access without altering broader traffic configurations immediately.
Page 127 of 304 contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents and tourists. Previous Report/Authority: Staff Report CS-26-020 - Project 3a3 - Tourism Services at the Tom Thomson Art Gallery Pilot Project Tom Thomson Art Gallery Pilot Project, City Council directs staff to bring forward a report respecting a pilot to have one (1) dedicated short-term visitor parking space adjacent to the Tom Thomson Art Gallery.” Background: Following the conclusion of the pilot project to relocate Tourism Services at the Tom Thomson Art Gallery, and the subsequent approval to continue this regarding a dedicated short term visitor parking space to support Tourism at the Tom in order to support visitors who just need information (maps, brochures, directions, etc.) or who are just dropping off or picking up at the Library. Analysis and Options: Following Council’s direction to establish one short-term parking space adjacent to the shared Library/Gallery/Tourism Services facility, staff reviewed parking usage patterns and operational needs. Library staff were consulted and they supported the idea for short term parking, identifying the same need for Library users. Based on this feedback, staff recommend the addition of two (2) short-term parking spaces rather than one to better support the level of demand experienced at the facility, particularly during the busy summer tourism season. The proposed short-term spaces would support visitors requiring quick access to Tourism Services for maps, brochures, directions, and event information, as well as Library patrons returning or picking up materials, or making brief visits. Demand for short-term parking is expected to increase during the peak tourism season. Staff Report CS-26-040: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Page 2 of 5 Page 128 of 304 While Council originally directed that one short-term parking space be established, a single space may not adequately accommodate simultaneous short-duration visits associated with the Library, Gallery, and Tourism Services operations. Establishing two spaces would provide greater flexibility, improve turnover and accessibility, and reduce the likelihood of short-term visitors occupying longer-term parking spaces or stopping in loading areas. The addition of two short-term parking spaces represents a practical and relatively low-cost operational improvement that could be implemented in advance of the July and August tourism season. Staff also recognize that there may be a longer-term need to review parking configuration, accessibility, and traffic flow around the facility more broadly; however, the proposed addition of two short-term spaces is viewed as an immediate and achievable measure that responds to current operational pressures and Council’s direction to improve access to these important cultural and community services. The short-term parking spaces will be enforced by the City’s parking enforcement contractor as part of scheduled patrols during the downtown hours of enforcement (Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). There will be no scheduled enforcement of the parking spaces on evenings or weekends. Staff recommend including the two short-term parking spaces into Schedule 4 of the Traffic By-law, under section 3.22.1.1, which reads: 3.22.1.1 no Person shall Park a Motor Vehicle for longer than a Short Term Parking time, as defined in this By-law, in the areas identified on Schedule 4 to this By-law. Schedule 4 will require amendments to include schedule “4B”: SCHEDULE 4B – Short Term Parking – 30 Minutes Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Highway Sides Location 1st Avenue West East – angled parking From a point 42 m spaces north of the north curb face of 8th Street East, the first two parking spaces immediately north of the two accessible parking spaces. Staff Report CS-26-040: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Page 3 of 5 Page 129 of 304 The restriction will be implemented through signage indicating “30 Minute Parking Only” with an accompanying tab stating “Library, Tourism, and Art Gallery Patrons Only.” No changes to the existing pavement markings are required. The corresponding by-law is listed on the same agenda as this report to ensure completion of the signage installation work before the tourism season. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The customized signs will be ordered through the City’s sign supplier at an estimated cost of $120 to $150 per parking stall, in addition to approximately 3 to 4 hours of staff time required for coordination and implementation. Human Resources Public Works staff will coordinate and install the signage. The City’s parking enforcement contractor enforces parking in the River District. Time and Scheduling Short-term parking spaces identified by signs would be implemented for the July/August summer tourist season. The signs are expected to take 5-6 weeks to be delivered. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: This report includes input gathered from public comments about Tourism and Library services as well as observations from staff. Staff Report CS-26-040: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Page 4 of 5 Page 130 of 304 Report Developed in Consultation With: Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Riley Brugess, By-law Enforcement Supervisor Mason Bellamy, Manager of Public Works and Engineering Manan Monga, Engineering Technologist - Traffic Tim Nicholls Harrison, Library CEO Attachments: Map of Short-Term Parking Spaces Reviewed by: Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Aidan Ware, Director and Chief Curator at aware@owensound.ca or 519-376-1932 ext. 5001. Staff Report CS-26-040: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking Page 5 of 5 Page 131 of 304 ± Short-Term Parking 846 820 1st Av eW 832 840 804 2nd Ave W 824 850 8th St E 8th St W Short-Term Parking Spots 197 800 795 75 Information shown on these drawings/maps/charts 0 4.75 9.5 19 791 Meters is compiled from numerous sources and may not 28.5 be complete or accurate 789 Page 132 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-050 Subject: Policy Consolidation – Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-050 respecting a policy consolidation into the Council Appointments and Seating Policy, City Council directs staff to bring forward a by-law to: 1. Approve Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001; and 2. Repeal Alternate Member of County Council Policy No. CrS-C41. Highlights: The policy review project began in 2023 and since its inception there has been a reduction of 275 City policies. Staff recommend that the Alternate Member of County Council Policy and the Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy be consolidated into the Council Seating and Appointments Policy. No substantive policy changes are being recommended at this time. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Staff Report CR-26-050: Policy Consolidation – Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Page 1 of 4
11.b Report CR-26-050 from the City Clerk Re: Policy Consolidation Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001
Grey County staff are proposing an administrative update that consolidates two existing policies into one single document to simplify council operations. This merger would combine the rules for selecting an alternate County Council member with those governing city board memberships and dais seating. The new unified policy would apply to all council members except the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, who already sit on the upper-tier council. Under this framework, an alternate member would serve the full term and step in when the Mayor or Deputy Mayor cannot attend. The selection process allows for open nominations by the Mayor, with the final candidate determined by a simple majority vote, a random draw, or by selecting the member with the highest votes if a majority cannot be reached. Once selected, the member receives appointment by by-law. Concurrently, City Council is directing staff to amend Appointed Officers By-law No. 2015-054 to appoint a By-law Enforcement Officer. This officer would foster regulatory compliance through education and enforcement under the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019. The City Clerk is authorised to review this specific policy every five years or sooner if legislative changes occur, though any revisions to the policy's intent will require Council consideration. No financial costs or resource changes are expected from these administrative updates.
Page 133 of 304 Previous Report/Authority: Municipal Act, 2001 Alternate Member of County Council Policy No. CrS-C41 (attached to report) Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy No. GOV001 Report CR-26-031 – 2027 Committee Structure and Calendar Report CR-18-011 – Alternate Member of County Council Background: Alternate Member of County Council Policy The Municipal Act, 2001, section 268, permits the council of a local municipality to appoint an alternate member to the upper-tier council, to act in place of a person who is unable to attend a meeting of the upper-tier council for any reason. Only one alternate can be appointed, and they must be appointed for the term of council. An alternate appointed by a local council cannot act as an alternate for the Warden. In 2018, Grey County approved the Council Alternate Member Policy No. GGEN-011, which describes notice requirements, compensation, voting, orientation, meeting preparation, declaration of office, closed session meetings, electronics, and communication. Also in 2018, City Council approved the Alternate Member of County Council Policy No. CrS-C41. In accordance with the policy review project, this policy is set for review in 2026. Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy The Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy No. GOV001 was approved in 2012 and updated in 2016 and 2024. At the April 13, 2026 Council meeting, Council directed staff to bring forward a by-law to amend the Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy to amend committee start dates and Council seating start dates to align with changes to the 2027 Committee structure. The by-law to amend this policy has not yet come forward for Council approval. Staff Report CR-26-050: Policy Consolidation – Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Page 2 of 4 Page 134 of 304 Analysis and Options: Staff recommend consolidating the Alternate Member of County Council Policy and the Board, Committee and Seat Selection Policy into the Council Seating and Appointment Policy No. GOV001 as attached to the report. This will reduce the policy stock by one (1) policy and combine all cyclical appointment processes together for ease of reference. No other substantive policy changes are proposed at this time. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources There are no financial impacts from the consolidation of these two City policies. Grey County will compensate an alternate member should they attend a meeting. Human Resources There are no human resource implications from the consolidation of these two City policies. Time and Scheduling The Alternate Member of County Council Policy was scheduled for review in 2026 to ensure it was ready for the new term of Council. The new Council Seating and Appointments Policy will be reviewed again in 2031 or sooner, if required, based on legislative changes or Council direction. Technology and Infrastructure The Councillor who is selected as the alternate member of County Council will meet with Grey County staff to review County technology and infrastructure requirements. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: The Council Seating and Appointment Policy will be on the City’s website once approved by by-law. Staff Report CR-26-050: Policy Consolidation – Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Page 3 of 4 Page 135 of 304 Report Developed in Consultation With: Manager of Legislative Services Attachments: 1. Alternate Member of County Council Policy No. CrS-C41 2. Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Reviewed by: Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk at bbloomfield@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1247. Staff Report CR-26-050: Policy Consolidation – Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 Page 4 of 4 Page 136 of 304 Policy CrS-C41 Title: Alternate Member of County Council Department/Division: Clerks Purpose: 1. To set out the procedure for selecting an alternate member of County accordance with section 268 of the Municipal Act, 2001. Scope: 2. This policy applies to all member of City Council, save and except the Mayor and Deputy Mayor who already sit on County Council. Policy: 3. Council appoints a member at the beginning of each term, to serve as an alternate member of County Council, for the term of Council. 4. The alternate member of County Council acts in the place of the Mayor or Deputy Mayor when either is unable to attend a meeting of County Council for any reason. 5. The following procedure determines the selection of an alternate member of County Council: a. The Mayor opens the floor for nominations. b. Members state, “I nominate ________ for the position of alternate member of County Council.” A seconder is not required for the nomination to stand. c. The Mayor asks the nominee if they will accept the nomination. d. The Mayor asks if there are any further nominations. e. When there are no further nominations, the Mayor will declare the nominations closed. Page 1 of 3 Page 137 of 304 Policy CrS-C41 Title: Alternate Member of County Council f. Where there is only one nominee, that member is acclaimed to the position. g. Where an election is required, members may only vote once. The Mayor will ask for a show of hands in favour of the first member nominated. If there is a majority show of hands for the first nominee, that member is declared the alternate member of County Council. h. Where there is not a majority, the Mayor will ask for a show of hands in favour of the second member nominated and so forth until there is a majority. i. Where all nominated members have been voted on and there is no majority, the nominated member with the highest number of votes is declared the alternate member of County Council. j. Where there is a tie for the highest number of votes, the names of the tied nominees are placed into a ‘hat’ and one name is drawn – the member whose name is drawn is declared the alternate member of County Council. k. Where no members accept a nomination, all members’, save and except the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, are placed into a ‘hat’ and one name is drawn – the member whose name is drawn is declared the alternate member of County Council. 6. The selected member is appointed by by-law as soon as practicable after the nomination process. 7. The City Clerk notifies the County Clerk of the election and provides any pertinent details of the selected member. Related Information: 8. City Report CR-18-011. 9. 10. County Report CCR-CW-03-18. Page 2 of 3 Page 138 of 304 Policy CrS-C41 Title: Alternate Member of County Council 11. County Policy G-Gen-011. 12. City Report CR-18-125. 13. Revision History: Authorization Date Page 3 of 3 Page 139 of 304 Policy GOV001 Council Seating and Appointments Topic: Governance Lead Division: Clerks Next Scheduled Review: 2031 Policy Statement 1. The City recognizes that a policy on City Council seat selection and City Council appointments to boards, committees and County Council provides clarity of process and equal opportunity. Purpose 2. The purpose of this policy is to detail the processes used to determine City Council’s seating arrangement, City Council’s board and committee selection order and the selection of the alternate member of County Council as permitted under section 268 of the Municipal Act, 2001. Scope 3. This policy applies to all members of City Council, save for the alternate member of County Council selection process, which does not apply to the Mayor or Deputy Mayor, who already sit on County Council. Definitions 4. For the purposes of this policy, “Board” means a board as identified in the City’s Board and Committee Bylaw; “City” means the City of Owen Sound, and a reference to the City is a reference to the geographical area or The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound as the context requires; “City Clerk” means the Clerk for the City; “Committee” means a committee as identified in the City’s Board and Committee By-law; “Council” means the body of people formally elected to lead the City or the County; “Councillor” means a member of Council for the City or the County; and “County” means the County of Grey. GOV001 Council Appointments and Seating Page 1 of 4 Page 140 of 304 Policy Seat Selection Process 5. Council will select their seats on the Council dais annually as follows: a. Starting from west to east, Councillors will each draw one (1) number at random to determine their seat in Council Chambers, such that the number will correspond with seats numbered 1 to 3 and 6 to 9 from west to east as shown below: ☐ ☐ ☐ Deputy Mayor Mayor ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Public Gallery 6. Notwithstanding section 5 above, the Mayor will determine the Council seating arrangement for the first year after a regular election. 7. The Council seating arrangement will be effective January 1 of each year. Board and Committee Selection Process 8. Council will select the boards and committees on which they wish to serve annually as follows: a. Starting from west to east, Councillors (including the Deputy Mayor) will draw one (1) number at random to determine the board and committee selection order such that: i. the Councillor who drew number 1 will make the first selection; and ii. the Councillor who drew each number in sequence from 2 to 8 will make their selection, followed by 8 to 1, and so on, until all Council positions on boards and committees have been filled. 9. Where Council appointments for any board or committee will continue for the upcoming year, Councillors may take a pass for each continuing appointment at any time to encourage a similar number of appointments for all Councillors. 10. New Council board and committee terms will begin January 1 of each year. Alternate Member of County Council Selection Process 11. Council will appoint a member at the beginning of each term to serve as an alternate member of County Council for the term of Council. 12. The alternate member of County Council acts in the place of the Mayor or Deputy Mayor when either is unable to attend a meeting of County Council for any reason. GOV001 Council Appointments and Seating Page 2 of 4 Page 141 of 304 13. The following procedure determines the selection of an alternate member of County Council: a. The Mayor opens the floor for nominations. b. Members state, “I nominate ________ for the position of alternate member of County Council.” A seconder is not required for the nomination to stand. c. The Mayor asks the nominee if they will accept the nomination. d. The Mayor asks if there are any further nominations. e. When there are no further nominations, the Mayor will declare the nominations closed. f. Where there is only one nominee, that member is acclaimed to the position. g. Where an election is required, members may only vote once. The Mayor will ask for a show of hands in favour of the first-nominated member. If there is a majority show of hands for the first nominee, that member is declared the alternate member of County Council. h. Where there is not a majority, the Mayor will ask for a show of hands in favour of the second-nominated member and so forth until there is a majority. i. Where all nominated members have been voted on, and there is no majority, the nominated member with the highest number of votes is declared the alternate member of County Council. j. Where there is a tie for the highest number of votes, the Clerk will place the names of the tied nominees into a box, hat, or like container, and the Mayor will draw one name. The member whose name is drawn is declared the alternate member of County Council. k. Where no members accept a nomination, the Clerk will place the names of all members, save and except the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, into a box, hat, or like container, and the Mayor will draw one name. The member whose name is drawn is declared the alternate member of County Council. 14. The selected member will be appointed by by-law as soon as practicable after the nomination process. 15. The City Clerk will notify the County Clerk of the appointment and provide any pertinent details of the appointed member. GOV001 Council Appointments and Seating Page 3 of 4 Page 142 of 304 Policy Review 16. 17. The City Clerk will review this policy: a. every five (5) years to ensure effectiveness and compliance with current business processes; or b. sooner, if required, based on legislative changes or if directed by Council. The City Clerk is authorized to make such administrative changes to this policy as appropriate to keep the policy current. Any revision to the policy’s intent must be presented to Council for consideration. Related Information and Resources Internal 18. Board and Committee By-law External 19. Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 Appendices 20. N/A Revision History Authority Date Approval Council 2012-12-03 Council 2016-01-25 Administration 2024-04-15 By-law No. 2016005 City Clerk Council Click or tap to enter a date. By-law Choose an item. Click or tap to enter a date. Choose an item. GOV001 Council Appointments and Seating Description of Amendment Original (CrS-C37) Formatted to new template including the addition of standard definitions. Combine former CrSC41 with GOV001 and change name of policy from Council Board, Committee and Seat Selection Page 4 of 4 Page 143 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-046 Subject: Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-046 respecting the appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer, City Council directs staff to bring forward a by-law to amend the Appointed Officers By-law No. 2015-054 as outlined in the report. Highlights: The Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019 provides that a municipal council may appoint persons to enforce the by-laws of the municipality. The City’s By-law Enforcement Officers foster compliance with regulatory by-laws through education, awareness, promotion, advice, and enforcement. Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019 Appointed Officers By-law Staff Report CR-26-046: Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer Page 1 of 3
11.c Report CR-26-046 from the City Clerk Re: Appointment of aBy-law Enforcement Officer
The City plans to hire a part-time By-law Enforcement Officer starting June 8, 2026, to improve compliance through education and enforcement. This new role will require amending the Appointed Officers By-law to formally appoint Peter Schultz and secure additional systems and infrastructure, though the 2026 budget has already approved the financial resources. No environmental impacts are expected. Simultaneously, an application for decorative railings and awnings at 790 2nd Avenue East is under review. Staff support the project but recommend specific conditions: a minimum vertical clearance of 2.5 metres to ensure room for snow removal equipment and future grade changes, and a maximum horizontal projection of 1.0 metre. Council must approve these conditions and authorise an encroachment agreement that incorporates the safety requirements and height adjustments.
Page 144 of 304 Background: The City has an Appointed Officers By-law that ensures all appointments are in one place. Analysis and Options: The City hired a part time By-law Enforcement Officer who begins their employment on June 8, 2026. The By-law Enforcement Officer will be fostering compliance with regulatory by-laws through education, awareness, promotion, advice, and enforcement. To authorize the Officer to enforce City regulatory by-laws, the Appointed Officers By-law must be amended as follows: 1. Appoint Peter Schultz as a By-law Enforcement Officer and a Property Standards Officer effective June 8, 2026. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The part time By-law Enforcement Officer position was approved through the 2026 budget. Human Resources N/A. Time and Scheduling N/A. Technology and Infrastructure Additional systems and infrastructure are required for this position. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: The Appointed Officers By-law is available on the City’s website. Staff Report CR-26-046: Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer Page 2 of 3 Page 145 of 304 Report Developed in Consultation With: By-law Enforcement Supervisor Attachments: None. Reviewed by: Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk at bbloomfield@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1247. Staff Report CR-26-046: Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer Page 3 of 3 Page 146 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Kristen Van Alphen, Manager of Legislative Services Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-051 Subject: Encroachment Application – 790 2nd Avenue East Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-051 respecting an Encroachment Application for 790 2nd Avenue East, City Council: 1. 2. Approves the application, provided that the encroachments are constructed with: a. A minimum vertical clearance of 2.5 metres; and b. A maximum horizontal projection of 1.0 metre; and Directs staff to bring forward a by-law to execute a Limited Encroachment Agreement with the owner of the subject lands, that includes the approved vertical clearance and horizontal projection requirements. Highlights: An encroachment application has been received for decorative railings and awnings at 790 2nd Avenue East. Staff support the application provided that vertical clearance and horizontal projection requirements are met. Staff recommend increasing the vertical clearance height to accommodate snow removal equipment and changes in grade over time. Staff Report CR-26-051: Encroachment Application – 790 2nd Avenue East Page 1 of 4
11.d Report CR-26-051 from the Manager of Legislative Services Re: Encroachment Application - 790 2nd Avenue East
The report addresses an encroachment application at 790 2nd Avenue East, where city equipment must traverse beneath structures and pedestrian paths must remain clear for maintenance like snow removal. Financial and human resources are aligned for staff to draft an agreement and register it on title, with the applicant required to pay fees and provide insurance. The process involves a 30-day review period for the applicant after council approval, ensuring community notice via website posting and title registration. No climate or environmental impacts are anticipated, and the report was developed in consultation with various city departments including fire prevention and engineering services.
Page 147 of 304 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: Encroachment By-law No. 2020-100 Background: The City has received an encroachment application respecting decorative railings and awnings for the windows and doors at 790 2nd Avenue East. A diagram of the proposed encroachments is attached. The encroachments would not affect the integrity of the main building on the property and, therefore, would be suitable, if approved, for a Limited Encroachment Agreement. This means that encroachments may be approved for construction, provided the City may request their removal in the future with six (6) months’ notice to the owner. Analysis and Options: Staff in Building, By-law Enforcement, Engineering, Fire, Planning, and Parks & Open Space have reviewed the application and have no concerns save for the following: 1. The decorative features must provide for a minimum clearance height of 2.5 metres above the sidewalk (vertical clearance). 2. The decorative features must not project more than 1.0 metre out from the building (horizontal projection). With respect to the minimum clearance height, staff advise that although the proposed overhead height of 2100 mm meets the minimum guidelines for barrier-free design, the City frequently uses snow-clearing machinery in the downtown core to manage winter snow accumulation. The equipment the City currently uses for this operation is nearing the 2.1 metre proposed minimum height. To accommodate future equipment and support minor grade changes within the road allowance over time, staff recommend raising the minimum approved clearance to 2.5 metres. It is noted that the sidewalk Staff Report CR-26-051: Encroachment Application – 790 2nd Avenue East Page 2 of 4 Page 148 of 304 along 8th Street East at the building has a limited width, and City equipment is expected to regularly traverse beneath these encroachments. Likewise, the maximum allowable projection from the building of 1.0 metre is intended to make sure that the encroachments don’t interfere with maintenance of the City's road allowance (i.e., snow removal). The maximum projection also ensures that a pedestrian path of travel is clear and free of obstacles and that the elements fit into the visual streetscape. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The applicant has paid an application fee to cover the cost of reviewing, analyzing, and commenting on the application. If approved, the applicant will pay an agreement fee to cover the cost of drafting the agreement and registering it on title to the property. Human Resources Staff have already reviewed and commented on this application. The Manager of Legislative Services (“MLS”) will draft the agreement and work with the City Solicitor to have it registered on title. These resources are available. Time and Scheduling Once Council has made a decision on this application, the MLS will contact the applicant to let them know the outcome. Once an agreement is drafted, the applicant will have thirty (30) days to review it and return it, executed, to the City, along with the agreement fee, and a certificate of insurance naming the City. At that time, the by-law will be brought forth for final approval. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Staff Report CR-26-051: Encroachment Application – 790 2nd Avenue East Page 3 of 4 Page 149 of 304 Communication and Engagement: This report has been posted to the City’s website in advance of the meeting, and the applicant has been made aware. The applicant will be contacted and provided with an agreement to review if the application is approved. When the agreement is executed, it will be registered on the title to the property, giving notice of the encroachment. Report Developed in Consultation With: By-law Enforcement Supervisor; CBO and Building Inspector; Fire Prevention Officer; Engineering Services staff; and Manager of Planning & Heritage. Attachments: Diagram of Proposed Encroachments Reviewed by: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Kristen Van Alphen, Manager of Legislative Services at kvanalphen@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 1228. Staff Report CR-26-051: Encroachment Application – 790 2nd Avenue East Page 4 of 4 Page 150 of 304 Page 151 of 304 Page 152 of 304 Page 153 of 304 Page 154 of 304 Page 155 of 304 Page 156 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Kristen Van Alphen, Manager of Legislative Services Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-055 Subject: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-055 respecting 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments, City Council directs staff to bring forward by-laws to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign all documents necessary to complete the sale of: 1. Part 1 on Plan 16R-12330 to the owner of 1182 3rd Avenue West; and 2. Part 2 on Plan 16R-12330 to the owner of 1186 3rd Avenue West. Highlights: Owners at 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West have submitted Agreements of Purchase and Sale for parts of an adjacent Cityowned lane. City Council approved the sales, subject to a public report with opportunity for neighbours to comment, and by-laws to complete the transactions. The City received one comment opposing the sale from a neighbour who lives on 12th Street West and backs onto the lane. The final step for these sales is to bring forward by-laws to authorize the execution of all documents to complete the transactions. Staff Report CR-26-055: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Page 1 of 5
11.e Report CR-26-055 from the Manager of Legislative Services Re: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments
A two-year negotiation to split and sell a surplus municipal lane between 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West is set to conclude with a proposed June 19, 2026, closing. Two parties submitted offers to purchase the divided portions, valuing the land based on previous appraisals, after paying survey deposits and undergoing staff-led assessments including tree and sewer reviews. While the City Clerk received one public objection from neighbour John Tennant, who claims the lands form part of his fenced backyard and fears privacy loss, the City confirmed the lane is registered and protected from adverse possession. Staff recommend completing the sale, with all legal and survey costs borne by buyers totaling roughly $16,220. A by-law authorising these transfers is proposed for June 15, 2026, following notices delivered to neighbours within a 60-metre radius to allow ten days for comment. Concurrently, the City prepares to update its 2026 Fees and Charges by-law effective July 1, with user fees projected to cover about 10% of the operating budget.
Page 157 of 304 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: 1. Disposition of Land By-law 2. Closed Session Report CR-25-082 – 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Expressions of Interest Respecting an Adjacent Lane 3. Closed Session Report CR-26-041 – 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Offers to Purchase Parts of Adjacent Lane Background: In March 2024, City Council declared a lane surplus to the City’s needs following a request from an adjacent landowner to purchase its western portion. The subject lane, at the time, ran west from 3rd Avenue West in the 1100 block and doglegged north to come out on 12th St West: Red is what was declared surplus and closed in 2024. Blue is what was sold in 2024. Staff Report CR-26-055: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Page 2 of 5 Page 158 of 304 In the process of considering whether to close the lane and declare it surplus to the City's needs, notice was sent to the mailing addresses of owners within a 60 metre radius of the subject property. In response to that notice, two neighbours approached the City about purchasing the remaining portion of the lane. Through negotiations with the parties, a split of the lane into two parts was contemplated. The two interested parties paid a survey deposit to have the lands formally divided, and each submitted an offer to City Council to purchase the land. The valuations in the offers were based on the appraisal completed for the initial sale of the western portion of the lane. On April 27, City Council directed staff to provide notice of the potential sale and to bring forward an open report on the completion of the sale, including any comments received. Analysis and Options: On April 28, staff hand-delivered notices to neighbours within a 60-metre radius of the lane. Only one comment was received, and it is attached to this report with photos submitted by the commenter. The commenter, John Tennant, a homeowner on 12th Street West who backs onto the lane, has indicated that they oppose the sale because they have been using a portion of the lane as an extension of their backyard for some time. Staff have confirmed that this lane is a lane on a registered plan, which means it is protected from claims of adverse possession. Staff recommend that the purchasers, who have worked with the City for two years to develop these sale transactions, be sold the lands as presented in the Agreements of Purchase and Sale. The final step for these sales is to bring forward by-laws to authorize the execution of all documents to complete the transactions. Staff Report CR-26-055: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Page 3 of 5 Page 159 of 304 Resource Alignment: Financial Resources All costs related to the sales, including legal and survey costs, will be borne by the purchasers. The sale costs, derived from the land appraisal are, are $14,175.21 for Part 1 and $2,045.11 for Part 2. Human Resources These transactions have taken a long time because there is no staff dedicated to land matters of this nature, and they are addressed as other work permits. That issue, combined with a zealous winter, has protracted the time staff needed to negotiate the land sharing, undertake tree condition assessments and removals, address sewer concerns, generate and register a survey, and prepare the draft agreements. Time and Scheduling If these sales are approved, the by-law will come forward on June 15. The closing is scheduled for June 19, 2026. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: The public was advised in February/March 2024, through a mailing to neighbours and an advertisement in The Sun Times newspaper, of the intention to close the lane and declare it surplus to the City’s needs, as well as sell the western portion. The by-law to close the lane was passed on March 25, 2024, and registered on title on March 27, 2024. Notice of the current sales was provided to neighbours within a 60 metre radius of the subject lands, through hand delivery on April 28, 2026. Hand delivery was selected to ensure that neighbours were provided a minimum of ten (10) days to comment, while maintaining the proposed closing date. Staff Report CR-26-055: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Page 4 of 5 Page 160 of 304 The closing is proposed to happen on June 19, 2026, at which time the land transfers will be registered on title to the property. Report Developed in Consultation With: Director of Community Services, Director of Public Works and Engineering, City Clerk, City Solicitor. Attachments: Comments of Mr. John Tennant, including pictures Reviewed by: Briana Bloomfield, City Clerk Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Kristen Van Alphen, Manager of Legislative Services at kvanalphen@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 1228. Staff Report CR-26-055: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments Page 5 of 5 Page 161 of 304 Public comments on proposed sale of lane between 1182 and 1186 3 rd Avenue West. I object to the proposed disposal of the municipal lands along the rear of my property, located at 375 12th St W. I first became aware of this matter last fall when a man came to my house and asked to mark trees for removal. When I asked what was happening, I was referred to City Hall. I was very carefully told that for privacy reasons I could not be given any details about who was to receive what, and I was told that it was already decided and that an agreement had been signed and could not be changed. I did not receive any prior notice about this closure. I was told that the notice went to my previous address listed in the assessment roll, which is curious because I did receive notice of a proposed closure of another portion of the same lane along my neighbour’s property at 385 12th St W. That notice was given to me at my current 12th St W location, over 2 years ago, long before any notice could have been given for this proposed closure notice that purportedly went to the wrong address. I did not object to that closure on my neighbour’s property because it had no adverse effect on my property. These lands have formed part of my fenced rear yard for many years. They have not functioned as a public lane in any meaningful way. I therefore request confirmation of the legal status of the subject lands, including whether they are in fact formally labelled as a lane in a registered plan, which is a key requirement to be protected under the Municipal Act or any other applicable statute. The proposed removal of my trees and fencing would significantly reduce the privacy and enjoyment of my rear yard and would drastically reduce the size of my yard (please see attached photos). This would be a major invasion into my private use of the property and would materially change the character of my rear yard. It would also require me to construct a new fence along my shrunken rear yard, which I do not think I should be required to do. Except for a desire to enlarge their property, there is absolutely no justification for these lands to be added to my neighbour’s property and every reason not to do so. If the lands are not lawfully protected from adverse possession or otherwise retained for public use, then I assert my claim to the lands based on long-standing, enclosed, exclusive, and continuous possession. There are many lanes in the City that could be considered surplus and disposed of Page 162 of 304 without harming adjacent homeowners. This proposed transfer is very different. It directly affects my property and privacy in an extremely adverse manner. I therefore object to the transfer of these lands to any third party. If Council is minded to dispose of the lands at all, I ask that the lands be transferred to my ownership as the Thank you for considering my comments as part of the public record. John Tennant Page 163 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: David Crane, Deputy Treasurer Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-054 Subject: 2026 Fees and Charges Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-054 respecting the 2026 Fees and Charges By-law, City Council directs staff to: 1. 2. Bring forward a by-law to: a. Establish the 2026 Fees and Charges as outlined in the fee schedules attached to the report; and b. Repeal the 2025 Fees and Charges By-law No. 2025-060; and Provide notice in accordance with the City’s Notice By-law No. 2018-022 of the City’s intention to: a. Repeal Fees and Charges By-law No. 2026-060; and b. Replace it with the 2026 Fees and Charges By-law. Highlights: Fees and charges are reviewed annually in the spring, with the new By-law taking effect July 1. In accordance with Council direction, each standing committee has reviewed the applicable proposed departmental fees and charges prior to coming to Council for final approval. User fees and charges (not including water and wastewater rates) will generate approximately 10 per cent of the revenue considered in the City’s 2026 operating budget. Staff Report CR-26-054: 2026 Fees and Charges Page 1 of 5
11.f Report CR-26-054 from the Deputy Treasurer Re: 2026 Fees and Charges
Owen Sound proposes a new three-year cyclical review for service fees, meaning charges are examined at least once every three years rather than annually, starting in 2026. This shift addresses staff capacity while allowing immediate updates for operational needs or legal changes. User fees are projected to cover roughly 10% of the 2026 operating budget. Specific changes clarify that public works event fees apply only to for-profit entities requiring road closures or barricades, replacing previously free items with costs of $15 for barrels and $5 for barricades. Charges double for after-hours work outside standard business hours. New fees include higher costs for non-residential construction permits, short-term rentals, and cemetery services, with administrative charges for payments and cheques reflecting actual expenses. Water rates outside city boundaries will double, and transit fares will increase for adults and seniors. The municipality also proposes dedicating a parkland parcel near Highway 32nd Street East to the highway instead of a multi-use trail to ensure property access and utility crossings. Road closure deposits and oversize permit fees rise to cover patrol and detour costs. A new event deposit aims to prevent organizers from holding unlimited dates without payment. These structural changes shift financial responsibility for sewer connections and road maintenance costs to residents and businesses, potentially impacting those with fewer resources navigating an increasingly expensive civic infrastructure.
Page 164 of 304 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: Report CR-26-030 – 2026 Corporate Services Fees and Charges Update Report CR-26-039 – 2026 Community Services Fees and Charges Update Report CR-26-040 – 2026 Operations Fees and Charges Update Background: fees and charges updates be presented to the applicable Standing Committees prior to final Council approval. This increases transparency and provides additional opportunity for Committee input. The Corporate Services Committee reviewed the following fee schedules: A. Animal Control D. Clerks F. Fire and Emergency Services G. Parking & By-law K. Tax, Water & Finance The Community Services Committee reviewed the following fee schedules: B. Building C. Cemetery H. Parks & Recreation I. Planning The Operations Committee reviewed the following fee schedules: E. Engineering J. Public Works L. Transit M. Waste The 2026 water and wastewater rates have been presented as a separate annual report to the Operations Committee in May and will be incorporated into the 2026 Fees and Charges By-law once approved by Council. Staff Report CR-26-054: 2026 Fees and Charges Page 2 of 5 Page 165 of 304 Fee changes relating to sidewalk patios have been included in the attached proposed fees and charges schedules under Schedule I – Planning, as they were previously approved by Council through report CS-26-031 to come into effect July 1. In 2025, as part of Service Review Project 4c3, all fee schedules were divided into three annual cyclical review cycles. This approach ensures every fee is reviewed at least once every three years while also considering staff capacity and allowing for more in-depth review of fees. 2026 is the first year of reviewing fees through the review cycles, as previously all fees were reviewed each year. The three-year cycle establishes a minimum review frequency, not a fixed limit. Fees may still be identified by staff or Committees for a more fulsome review at any time due to operational changes, service offerings, Council direction, or changes in legislative requirements. Analysis and Options: The 2026 proposed fee schedules are attached to this report (Attachment 1). For clarity, while reviewing proposed changes in the fee schedules the following has been highlighted: Any proposed fee additions or increases that differ from a standard percentage increase have been highlighted in green. Any proposed fee removals have been highlighted in red. Administrative changes to fee titles or notes have been redlined. Additionally, a summary of changes has been provided as an attachment to this report (Attachment 2) for ease of reference. Committee Feedback Feedback received from the standing committees has been incorporated into the proposed fee schedules as attached. There were no amendments arising from either the Community Services Committee or Corporate Services Committee meetings. note to the Event Fees in Schedule J – Public Works, to clarify that these fees are only charged to for-profit events. This applies to the fees for road closure and detour set ups and barrel and barricade usage. This amendment has been made in the proposed schedules in Attachment 1. Staff Report CR-26-054: 2026 Fees and Charges Page 3 of 5 Page 166 of 304 Resource Alignment: Financial Resources User fees and charges (not including water and wastewater rates) are anticipated to generate $5,385,000 or approximately 10 per cent of the City of Owen Sound’s 2026 Operating Budget. Human Resources Implementation of the three-year cyclical review cycles considers staff capacity by ensuring that no division needs to perform an in-depth review of all departmental fees in a given year. Staff from each division work with finance staff to review fees annually. Time and Scheduling Each of the three Standing Committees received a fees and charges review report in April 2026. Following these meetings, Committee feedback was incorporated into this report and the attached fee schedules. The 2026 Fees and Charges By-law will be presented for Council adoption in June, and the new fees will come into effect beginning July 1, 2026. In future years, the fees and charges review will begin in the fall as part of the operating budget process to ensure there is sufficient time to perform indepth cost analysis of services and fees. Additionally, considering fee changes alongside that process will help to inform the operating budget. Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: This report communicates the final recommended fees to Council and the public through the published agenda. Notice will be provided on the City’s website to communicate that the By-law to adopt the 2026 fees and charges will be considered by Council in June 2026, in accordance with the City’s Notice By-law. Staff Report CR-26-054: 2026 Fees and Charges Page 4 of 5 Page 167 of 304 After adoption, the fees and charges by-law and fee schedules will be available on the City’s website. Additionally, any changes to fees will be communicated as required by the affected division and in the best method for the type of fee, which may include public notice, posting of rates, communication at the point of sale, and other methods. Report Developed in Consultation With: Committee and Executive Support Coordinator Departmental staff Attachments: 1. 2026 Proposed Fee Schedules 2. Summary of Fee Changes Reviewed by: Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact David Crane, Deputy Treasurer at dcrane@owensound.ca or 519-376-4440 ext. 1223. Staff Report CR-26-054: 2026 Fees and Charges Page 5 of 5 Page 168 of 304 Schedule A. - Animal Control Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Release of a pet by Animal Control requires payment of the applicable Reclamation Fee, Shelter Fee and any other required fees or charges which can include Failure to Licence charge, Emergency Services charge, Maintenance Fee and Licence Fee as applicable. **Fee per Animal Control Services Contract. 3 (2028) Shelter Fees 1. Quarantine fee ** $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 each + HST Reclamation fee ** Failure to Licence Pet Shelter fee - first time Shelter fee - second time Shelter fee - third time Emergency Services (After hours pick-up) ** Maintenance fee (impound) ** Release of Ownership to Shelter – One Cat or Dog Release of Ownership to Shelter – Litter of puppies or 10. kittens Dogs 11. Dog Licence (spayed/neutered dog) 12. Dog Licence (dog not spayed/neutered) 13. Dog Licence - late fee 14. Dangerous or potentially dangerous dog $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100.00 50.00 25.00 35.00 45.00 75.00 12.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100.00 50.00 25.00 35.00 45.00 75.00 12.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100.00 50.00 25.00 35.00 45.00 75.00 12.00 50.00 each each each each each each per day each + HST + HST + HST + HST + HST + HST + HST Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) $ $ $ $ 25.00 40.00 20.00 250.00 $ $ $ $ 25.00 40.00 20.00 250.00 $ $ $ $ 25.00 40.00 20.00 250.00 per year per year per licence per year Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 15. $ 14.00 $ 14.00 $ 14.00 per tag + HST 3 (2028) $ $ 10.00 300.00 $ $ 10.00 300.00 $ $ 10.00 300.00 per dog per kennel + HST Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ $ 35.00 50.00 $ $ 35.00 50.00 $ $ 35.00 50.00 per cat per cat Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Replacement Dog Tag 16. Change of Ownership 17. Kennel Licence - new Cats 18. Cat Licence (spayed/neutered cat) 19. Cat Licence (cat not spayed/neutered) Schedule A. - Animal Control 1 of 50 Page 169Page of 304 Schedule A. - Animal Control Service or Activity 20. 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Replacement Cat Tag $ 14.00 $ 14.00 $ 14.00 per tag + HST 3 (2028) 21. Change of Ownership Appeals 22. Muzzle/Leash Order 23. Dangerous Dog Order $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 per cat + HST 3 (2028) $ $ 200.00 200.00 $ $ 200.00 200.00 $ $ 200.00 200.00 per order per order Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Schedule A. - Animal Control 2 of 50 Page 170Page of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 1. 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle $ 57.89 $ 60.79 $ 63.85 Residential permits Exempt Required for all permits in addition to fees listed below. Multi-residential is per unit 1 (2026) $ 115.75 $ 121.54 $ 127.60 Non-residential permits Exempt Required for all permits in addition to fees listed below. 1 (2026) $ 17.60 $ 18.48 $ 19.40 Per m of gross floor area Exempt See notes 1 and 2 1 (2026) $ 5.79 $ 6.08 $ 6.40 Per m2 for attached structures Exempt Includes garages, decks, and porches built with new dwelling 1 (2026) $ 16.34 $ 17.16 $ 18.00 Per m gross floor area Exempt See notes 1 and 2 1 (2026) $ Per m gross 8.95 floor area of parking structure Administration Fee Building Permits - Residential 2. 3. New single detached, semi-detached, duplex, and row dwellings Multi-residential buildings, apartments, hotels, motels, triplexes 2 2 2 $ 8.11 $ 8.52 Exempt 1 (2026) 2 $ 4. 17.60 $ 18.48 Per m gross floor area Dwellings $ 19.40 $ Per m gross 18.00 floor area - Multiresidential Additions Exempt See note 2 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See notes 2, 4, and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See notes 2, 4, and 6 1 (2026) 2 $ 16.34 $ 17.16 2 5. $ 8.11 $ 8.52 $ $ 5.79 $ 6.08 $ Renovations Per m of 8.95 renovated area Dwellings 2 Per m of renovated area 6.40 Multiresidential Schedule B. - Building Page 3 of 50 Page 171 of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit 2 Applicable Tax 6. Detached Accessory structure $ 5.79 $ 6.08 $ 6.40 Per m of building area Exempt 7. Decks/porches $ 173.65 $ 182.33 $ 191.45 Per structure Exempt Shell Building $ 15.05 $ 15.80 $ 16.60 Finished Bldg $ 19.68 $ 20.66 $ 26.70 Additions $ 19.68 $ 20.66 $ 26.70 Renovations $ 10.42 $ 10.94 $ 11.50 Shell Building $ 15.05 $ 15.80 $ 16.60 Finished Bldg $ 22.00 $ 23.10 $ 24.25 Additions $ 22.00 $ 23.10 $ 24.25 Renovations $ 12.74 $ 13.38 $ 14.05 Shell Building $ 7.72 $ 8.11 $ 8.50 Finished Bldg $ 12.74 $ 13.38 $ 14.05 Additions $ 12.74 $ 13.38 $ 14.05 Renovations $ 10.42 $ 10.94 $ 11.50 Review Cycle Notes See note 6 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Building Permits - Non-Residential 8. 9. 10. Commercial Buildings Institutional Buildings Industrial Buildings 11. Designated Structures $ 13.89 $ 14.59 $ 15.30 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area 2 Per m of gross floor area Per $1,000 of construction value Schedule B. - Building Exempt See note 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2, 4 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See notes 2, 4, and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 , 4 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See notes 2, 4, and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See note 2 , 4 and 6 1 (2026) Exempt See notes 2, 4, and 6 1 (2026) Exempt Minimum fee $240.00. Includes structures set out in Section 1.3.1.1.[A] of the Ontario Building Code 1 (2026) Page 4 of 50 Page 172 of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Per permit Exempt Notes Review Cycle Plumbing Permits $ 144.70 $ 152.00 $ 159.60 $ 49.20 $ 51.66 $ 54.25 $ 4.63 $ 4.86 $ 5.10 $ 144.70 $ 152.00 $ 159.60 $ 191.00 $ 200.55 $ 210.60 $ 4.63 $ 4.86 $ $ 12.74 $ 13.38 $ 14.05 15. Conditional Building Permit $ 1,157.63 $ 1,215.51 $ 16. Foundation Only Permit $ 1,157.63 $ 17. Demolition of Buildings $ 18. Review of Demolition Plan $ 12. 13. Residential Commercial, Industrial, Institutional and other Non-residential Uses 14. Site Services Only Per additional dwelling unit Per plumbing fixture Per permit for Part 9 buildings Per permit for Part 3 buildings Per plumbing 5.10 fixture Exempt Permits for plumbing work not in combination with other construction work charged elsewhere. Accessory structures included. Admin fee additional. Exempt Exempt Exempt 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Permits for plumbing work not in combination with other construction work charged elsewhere. Accessory structures included. Admin fee additional. 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt 2 (2027) Per $1,000.00 prescribed value Exempt 2 (2027) 1,276.30 Each Exempt 1,215.51 $ 1,276.30 Each Exempt 1.16 $ 1.22 $ 1.30 Per m of gross floor area Exempt Minimum $180.00 fee plus additional deposits 2 (2027) 578.81 $ 607.75 $ 638.15 Flat fee Exempt For buildings requiring a P.Eng review as per article 1.2.2.1. of Div. C Part 1 2 (2027) Conditional Permits Plus all other applicable permit fees required 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Demolition Permits 2 Demolition Deposits Schedule B. - Building Page 5 of 50 Page 173 of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Exempt Exempt Refundable upon Final inspection Refundable upon Final inspection Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Notes 19. Accessory Structures 20. Residential Dwellings $ $ 200.00 1,500.00 $ $ 200.00 1,500.00 $ $ 200.00 1,500.00 21. Buildings - Small/medium $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Less than 600m2 Exempt Refundable upon Final inspection 2 (2027) More than 4,000.00 600m2 or Group F buildings Exempt Refundable upon Final inspection. See note 3. 2 (2027) 22. Buildings - Large/Industrial Per structure Per dwelling $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 115.76 578.81 578.81 115.76 115.76 347.29 $ $ $ $ $ $ 121.55 607.75 607.75 121.55 121.55 364.65 $ $ $ $ $ $ 127.65 638.15 638.15 127.65 127.65 382.90 per sign per sign per sign per sign per sign per sign Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Permanent no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 29. Roof sign (> 10m2) 30. Ground sign 31. Pylon Sign (≤ 7.5m high) 32. Pylon Sign (> 7.5m high) 33. Sandwich, H-frame sign 34. Portable Sign 35. Temporary Banner Other Permits and Services $ 578.81 $ 607.75 $ 638.15 per sign Exempt no additional admin fee 2 (2027) $ $ $ $ $ $ 115.76 463.05 578.81 57.89 231.53 57.89 121.55 486.20 607.75 60.78 243.10 60.78 $ $ $ $ $ $ 127.65 510.50 638.15 64.15 255.25 64.15 per sign per sign per sign per sign per sign per sign Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee no additional admin fee 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 36. Change of Use Permit $ 289.41 $ 303.88 $ 319.10 Flat fee Exempt 37. Alternative Solution $ 578.81 $ 607.75 $ 638.15 Per application Exempt 38. Permit Transfer (to new property owner) $ 86.82 $ 91.17 $ 95.75 Each Exempt 39. Tent Permit - area 60m2 - 225m2 $ 115.77 $ 121.55 $ 127.65 Per permit Exempt See note 5 3 (2028) 40. Tent Permit - area greater than 225m2 $ 347.29 $ 364.65 $ 382.90 Per permit Exempt See note 5 3 (2028) Sign Permits 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Banner Billboard Developer Sign Fascia, EMD Sign Projecting Sign 2 Roof sign (≤ 10m ) $ $ $ $ $ $ Schedule B. - Building When no construction requiring permits is required For review only, final decision to be made by CBO 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page 6 of 50 Page 174 of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax 41. Demountable stages and demountable support $ structures 231.53 $ 243.10 $ 255.25 per permit Exempt 42. Property Inquiry Request Form - Permit Status/Work Orders $ 115.77 $ 121.55 $ 127.65 Per property Exempt $ 57.89 $ 60.78 $ 64.15 Per tank Exempt Per property Exempt per revision Exempt per inspection Exempt 43. Septic Tank Decommissioning 45. Revision to existing permit Maximum of Maximum of Maximum of $5000.00 $5000.00 $5000.00 $ 115.77 $ 121.55 $ 127.65 46. Inspection fee $ 44. Construction or demolition without a permit 115.77 $ 121.55 $ 127.65 Notes See note 5 Review Cycle 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Additional plumbing permit required for service connection Fee is in addition to applicable building permit fees minimum of 1 hour review Pre-inspection and re-inspections. Due before inspection can be booked. 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Refund of Building Permit Fees 47. Administrative functions only have been performed 80% 80% 48. Administrative and zoning review functions only have been performed 70% 70% 49. All plans examinations have been completed 50% 50% The permit has been issued but no field inspections have been performed 25% 25% 0% 50. Permit is valued at $100.00 or less, or if any 51. field inspections have been undertaken 0% As required by 80% Building By-law No.2007-102 As required by 70% Building By-law No.2007-102 As required by 50% Building By-law No.2007-102 Exempt 3 (2028) Exempt 3 (2028) Exempt 3 (2028) As required by 25% Building By-law No.2007-102 Exempt 3 (2028) As required by 0% Building By-law No.2007-102 Exempt 3 (2028) Schedule B. - Building Page 7 of 50 Page 175 of 304 Schedule B. - Building Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Short-term rental licensing 52. Short-term rental licence - new $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 each year Exempt Licence valid for one year from date of issue 3 (2028) 52.1 C1 Short-term rental licence - new $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 each year Exempt Limited to STRs in C1 zones 3 (2028) 53. Short-term rental licence - renewal $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 each year Exempt Licence valid for one year from date of issue 3 (2028) 53.1 C1 Short-term rental licence - renewal $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 each year Exempt Limited to STRs in C1 zones 3 (2028) 54. Short-term rental licence - replacement $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) 55. Appeal $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) 56. Research and archive file retrieval $ 57.80 $ 60.78 $ 64.15 per hour Exempt 3 (2028) 57. Scanning drawings $ 5.79 $ 6.08 $ 6.40 per page Exempt Black and white only 3 (2028) 58. Printed drawings - letter, legal tabloid $ 0.58 $ 0.61 $ 0.65 per page Exempt Black and white only 3 (2028) 59. Printed drawings - large format drawings $ 23.15 $ 24.31 $ 25.55 per page Exempt Black and white only 3 (2028) Miscellaneous Fees Notes 1. This fee is also required for modular or mobile buildings or structures 2. No additional plumbing fees 3. A security deposit by the way of Letter of Credit or Cash security, provided in a form satisfactory to the City based on an estimate of costs of demolition and restoration of the property from a Professional Engineer to a maximum of 50% of the estimated costs to the satisfaction of the City's Chief Building Official. 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 4. When area can not be determined, fees are permitted to be charged at $11.00 (2024 - $11.55, 2025 - $12.13, 2026 - $12.74 2027 - $13.38) per $1,000 of construction value 3 (2028) 5. Includes one tent or a group of tents in one location at one event or one stage or group of stages at one location 6. The minimum building permit fee is $120.00 for residential permit and $240 for non residental permits 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Schedule B. - Building 3 (2028) Page 8 of 50 Page 176 of 304 Schedule C. - Cemetery By-law No. 2026-XXX 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle $ 1,745.73 $ 1,798.10 $ 1,852.04 Per grave + HST Fee Includes: 3% Future Development Fund, 40% Care and Maintenance Fund and 57% General Accounts (per legislative requirements). 1 (2026) Service or Activity In Ground Interment Rights - Upright Memorials 1. Single In Ground Interment Rights - Flat Markers Only 2. Cremation Lot 3. Single $ 559.93 $ 576.73 $ 594.03 $ 1,555.19 $ 1,601.85 $ 1,649.90 + HST (3 ft x 9 ft) + HST 1 (2026) Fee Includes: 3% Future Development Fund, 40% Care and Maintenance Fund and 57% General Accounts (per legislative requirements). 1 (2026) Natural Burial Interment Rights 4. Single $ 2,178.25 $ 2,243.60 $ 2,310.91 Columbarium Garden (Upright Memorials or Flat Markers) 1 (2026) + HST 5. Preferred Cremation $ 932.84 $ 960.83 $ 989.65 (4 ft x 3 ft) + HST 6. Preferred Infant Lots Columbarium Niche Inurnment Rights $ 932.84 $ 960.83 $ 989.65 (3 ft x 5 ft) + HST *Infants must be 18 months of age or younger. Fee includes: 3% Future Development Fund, 40% Care and Maintenance Fund and 57% General Accounts (per legislative requirements). * 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 7. Cabinet #1 - Rows A and G $ 2,706.59 $ 2,787.78 $ 2,871.42 + HST **Niche size is 1 foot by 1 foot. Columbarium Niche Inurnment rights include an individual or companion bronze memorial plaque. Fee includes: 15% Care and Maintenance Fund, 35% Future Development Fund and 50% General Accounts (per legislative requirements) 8. Cabinet #1 - Rows B and F $ 2,793.20 $ 2,876.99 $ 2,963.30 + HST ** 1 (2026) 9. Cabinet #1 - Rows C, D and E $ 3,061.05 $ 3,152.88 $ 3,247.47 + HST ** 1 (2026) 10. Cabinet #4 - Rows A and G $ 2,706.59 $ 2,787.78 $ 2,871.42 + HST ** 1 (2026) 11. Cabinet #4 - Rows B and F $ 2,793.20 $ 2,876.99 $ 2,963.30 + HST ** 1 (2026) 12. Cabinet #4 - Rows C, D and E $ 3,061.05 $ 3,152.88 $ 3,247.47 + HST ** 1 (2026) Schedule C. - Cemetery 1 (2026) 9 of 50 Page 177Page of 304 Schedule C. - Cemetery Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax + HST ** Notes Review Cycle 1 (2026) 13. Cabinet #5 - Rows A and G $ 3,743.01 $ 3,855.30 $ 3,970.95 14. Cabinet #5 - Rows B and F $ 3,862.79 $ 3,978.68 $ 4,098.04 + HST ** 1 (2026) 15. Cabinet #5 - Rows C,D and E $ 4,233.22 $ 4,360.22 $ 4,491.02 + HST ** 1 (2026) 16. Cabinet #6 - Rows A and G $ 3,743.01 $ 3,855.30 $ 3,970.95 + HST ** 1 (2026) 17. Cabinet #6 - Rows B and F $ 3,862.79 $ 3,978.68 $ 4,098.04 + HST ** 1 (2026) 18. Cabinet #6 - Rows C, D and E Interment Services 19. Interment - Adult - Single Depth $ 4,233.22 $ 4,360.22 $ 4,491.02 + HST ** 1 (2026) $ 1,137.77 $ 1,171.90 $ 1,207.06 + HST 2 (2027) 20. Interment - Adult - In-Ground - Saturday or Sunday $ 1,997.00 $ 2,056.91 $ 2,118.61 + HST 2 (2027) 21. Interment - Adult - In-Ground - Statutory Holidays $ 2,275.53 $ 2,343.80 $ 2,414.11 + HST 2 (2027) 22. Interment - Natural Burial $ 1,680.33 $ 1,730.74 $ 1,782.66 + HST 2 (2027) 23. Interment - Natural Burial - Saturday or Sunday $ 2,555.86 $ 2,632.54 $ 2,711.51 + HST 2 (2027) 24. Interment - Natural Burial - Statutory Holidays 25. Interment - Infant In-Ground $ 2,839.70 $ 2,924.89 $ 3,012.64 $ 360.94 $ 371.76 $ 382.92 + HST + HST 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 26. Interment - Infant In-Ground - Saturday or Sunday $ 631.67 $ 650.62 $ 670.14 + HST 2 (2027) 27. Interment - Infant In-Ground - Statutory Holidays $ 714.03 $ 735.46 $ 757.52 + HST 2 (2027) 28. Interment- Cremated Remains In-ground Interment - Cremated Remains In-Ground 29. Saturday or Sunday Interment - Cremated Remains In-Ground 30. Statutory Holidays Interment - Second set of Cremated remains in 31. same Opening Inurnment Services 32. Inurnment - Single 33. Inurnment - Single - Saturday or Sunday 34. Inurnment - Single - Statutory Holidays 35. Inurnment - Single - Cabinet #5 or #6 $ 422.43 $ 435.10 $ 448.15 + HST 2 (2027) $ 742.82 $ 765.11 $ 788.06 + HST 2 (2027) $ 846.15 $ 871.54 $ 897.69 + HST 2 (2027) $ 119.02 $ 122.59 $ 126.26 + HST 2 (2027) $ $ $ $ 306.03 527.03 596.35 431.25 315.21 542.84 614.24 444.19 324.67 559.13 632.67 457.51 + HST + HST + HST + HST 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Schedule C. - Cemetery Page 10 of 50 Page 178 of 304 Schedule C. - Cemetery Service or Activity Inurnment - Single - Cabinet #5 or #6 - Saturday or Sunday 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Review Cycle Notes $ 742.70 $ 764.98 $ 787.93 + HST 2 (2027) $ 840.39 $ 865.60 $ 891.57 + HST 2 (2027) $ 602.89 $ 620.98 $ 639.61 + HST 2 (2027) 39. Crypt Entombment - Single - Saturday or Sunday $ 1,054.08 $ 1,085.70 $ 1,118.27 + HST 2 (2027) 40. Crypt Entombment - Single - Statutory Holidays $ 1,200.55 $ 1,236.57 $ 1,273.66 + HST 2 (2027) 779.74 + HST 2 (2027) $ 1,336.24 $ 1,376.32 + HST 2 (2027) $ 1,515.40 $ 1,560.86 + HST 2 (2027) $ 441.21 $ 454.44 + HST 2 (2027) $ 771.23 $ 794.36 + HST 2 (2027) $ 877.63 $ 903.96 + HST 2 (2027) $ 175.00 $ 180.25 per month + HST 2 (2027) $ 60.13 $ 61.94 per day + HST 2 (2027) $ 94.06 $ 96.89 per month + HST 2 (2027) 36. Inurnment - Single - Cabinet #5 or #6 - Statutory Holiday Mausoleum Crypt Services 38. Crypt Entombment - Single 37. Crypt Entombment - Re-open & Inter Cremated $ 734.98 Remains Crypt Entombment - Re-open & Inter Cremated 42. $ 1,297.32 Remains - Saturday or Sunday Crypt Entombment - Re-open & Inter Cremated 43. $ 1,471.26 Remains - Statutory Holidays Scattering Services 44. Scattering - Cremated Remains $ 428.36 Scattering - Cremated Remains - Saturday or 45. $ 748.76 Sunday Scattering - Cremated Remains - Statutory 46. $ 852.07 Holidays Vault Storage Mausoleum Vault - Winter Storage (December 1st 47. $ 169.90 to May 31st only) Mausoleum Vault - Late Storage (June 1 - June 15 48. $ 58.38 only) 49. Cremation Storage (minimum 1 month fee) $ 91.33 Disinterment - Removal and Re-Interment Same Cemetery 50. Adult $ 2,768.59 51. Child $ 1,581.11 52. Infant $ 797.74 53. Cremated Remains $ 800.15 41. $ 757.03 $ $ 2,851.65 $ 2,937.19 $ 1,628.54 $ 1,677.40 $ 821.67 $ 846.33 $ 824.15 $ 848.88 Schedule C. - Cemetery + HST + HST + HST + HST Fee does not include boom truck or other additional expenses. Infants must be 18 months of age or younger. 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page 11 of 50 Page 179 of 304 Schedule C. - Cemetery Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Review Cycle Notes Disinterment - Removal and Re-Interment Elsewhere 54. Adult 55. Child 56. Infant 57. Cremated Remains Monument and Monument Foundation Installation $ 1,838.74 $ 1,893.90 $ 1,950.72 $ 1,047.53 $ 1,078.96 $ 1,111.33 $ 562.35 $ 579.22 $ 596.60 $ 520.50 $ 536.12 $ 552.20 + HST + HST + HST + HST Fee does not include boom truck or other additional expenses. Infants must be 18 months of age or younger. 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 58. Monument Foundation - 12 inch wide foundation $ 17.73 $ 18.27 $ 18.81 per linear inch + HST Foundation and base width ranges from 24 inches to 78 inches, maximum monument width must not exceed 2/3 the width of plot. 3 (2028) 59. Flat Marker Installation - Large $ 200.10 $ 206.10 $ 212.28 each + HST Larger than 1 foot by 2 feet 60. Flat Marker Installation - Medium 61. Flat Marker Installation - Small Monument/Flat Marker Care and Maintenance 62. Flat Marker - minimum of 1.2 square feet Upright Monument - 48 inches or less in height 63. and/or length (including base) Upright Monument - greater than 48 inches in 64. height and/or length (including base) $ $ 173.93 $ 151.72 $ 179.15 $ 156.27 $ 184.53 160.96 each each + HST + HST Between 10 inches by 16 inches to 1 foot by 2 feet Less than 10 inches by 16 inches $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 + HST 3 (2028) $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 + HST 3 (2028) $ 400.00 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 + HST 3 (2028) $175 or 40% $175 or 40% $175 or 40% of price of price of price whatever is whatever is whatever is greater greater greater + HST 3 (2028) Miscellaneous Fees 66. Double Depth Excavation - Extra Charge $ 520.50 $ 536.12 $ 552.20 + HST 3 (2028) 67. Scattering Memorialization on Central Memorial $ 176.55 $ 181.85 $ 187.30 + HST 3 (2028) 68. Transfer Fees, Administration and Title Search $ 90.24 $ 92.94 $ 95.73 + HST 3 (2028) 69. Care and Maintenance of Plots - Previously Unpaid $ 325.64 $ 335.41 $ 345.47 + HST 3 (2028) 70. Service Request Maintenance Fee $ 91.95 $ 94.71 $ 97.55 + HST 3 (2028) 71. Overtime Charges (every half hour after 4 p.m.) $ 121.28 $ 124.92 $ 128.67 per 0.5 hours 65. Infant Lot (South Extension) per hour Schedule C. - Cemetery + HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) For services rendered outside the normal working hours of 7:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. 3 (2028) Page 12 of 50 Page 180 of 304 Schedule C. - Cemetery Service or Activity 72. Mausoleum Committal Service Fee 73. Casket Carrying Fee 2026 $ $ 305.01 $ 45.71 $ 2027 314.16 $ 47.09 $ 2028 Unit 323.59 48.50 ANNUAL INCREASE - ALL GREENWOOD CEMETERY FEES CPI or max CPI or max CPI or max 5% , 5% , 5% , 74. Annual Increase whichever is whichever is whichever is lower lower lower By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax + HST Notes Review Cycle 3 (2028) per staff member + HST 3 (2028) per year N/A 3 (2028) Schedule C. - Cemetery Page 13 of 50 Page 181 of 304 Schedule E. - Engineering Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Engineering Services 1. Design Review Application - Minor Residential Structures Design Review Application - Site Plan Developments or Plans of Subdivision - Base fee Design Review - Site Plan Developments or Plans of 3. Subdivision - Development Costs less than $100,000 (Note 1) Design Review - Site Plan Developments or Plans of 4. Subdivision - Development Costs more than $100,000 (Note 1) 5. Engineering review - Official Plan Amendments 2. $ 107.00 $ 110.00 $ 113.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 680.00 $ 700.00 $ 720.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% each Exempt 2 (2027) 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 680.00 $ 700.00 $ 720.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) 6. Engineering review - Zoning By-law and Minor Variances $ 407.00 $ 419.00 $ 431.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) 7. Engineering review - Consent to Sever Applications $ 477.00 $ 491.00 $ 505.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) *an $8,000.00 initial deposit is required to be applied towards legal expenses. Any costs incurred over this amount will be invoiced 8. separately. If total expenses are less than the initial deposit, a refund along with a continuity statement will be issued for the remaining balance. 9. Master Servicing Agreement Preparation - Council approved agreement - By-law required Servicing Agreement Preparation - Under a Master Servicing 10. Agreement (Site Development Phasing) - Staff approved agreement - By-law not required Servicing or Pre-servicing Agreement Preparation - Stand 11. Alone Agreement - Council approved agreement - By-law required 12. Servicing or Pre-servicing Agreement Preparation - Stand Alone Agreement - Staff Delegated Minor 1 (2026) $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $ $ $ 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 Schedule E. - Engineering each Exempt Subject to extensive review in 2028. 1 (2026) each Exempt Subject to extensive review in 2028. 1 (2026) each Exempt Subject to extensive review in 2028. 1 (2026) each Exempt 3 (2028 Page 14 of 50 Page 182 of 304 Schedule E. - Engineering 13. Servicing or Pre-servicing Agreement Preparation - Stand Alone Agreement - Staff delegated Major 14. Capital Contribution or Cost Sharing Agreement Council approved agreement - By-law required Design Review - Servicing Agreement Works Review 15. Construction Costs less than $100,000 (where not included in Development review fees) (Note 1) Design Review - Servicing Agreement Works Review 16. Construction Costs more than $100,000 (where not included in Development review fees) (Note 1) 17. Servicing Agreement - Construction Security $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* 4.3% 4.3% 2.2% By-law No. 2026-XXX each Exempt 3 (2028 each Exempt 3 (2028 4.3% each Exempt 3 (2028 2.2% 2.2% each Exempt 3 (2028 100% $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* 100% $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* 100% $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* each Exempt 3 (2028 each Exempt Subject to extensive review in 2028. 1 (2026) each Exempt Subject to extensive review in 2028. 1 (2026) 18. Subdivision Agreement Preparation - Council approved agreement - By-law required 19. Subdivision Agreement Preparation - Phasing or Amending Agreement - Council approved agreement - By-law required 20. MECP CLI-ECA Application - Review and Approval Wastewater Collection System $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) 21. MECP CLI-ECA Application - Review and Approval - Storm Water Management System $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) 22. MECP CLI-ECA Application - Review and Approval Water Distribution System $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) Cost Recovery each 23. CLI-ECA Third party or Peer review verification 24. Engineering Drawing Request - Plan and Profile - City Infrastructure in Road Allowance per 5 drawings Cost Recovery $ 100.00 Cost Recovery $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Schedule E. - Engineering each Based on Actual costs incurred based on staff time and actual costs. expenses not exceeding actual costs. Exempt 3 (2028 1 (2026) Page 15 of 50 Page 183 of 304 Schedule E. - Engineering By-law No. 2026-XXX 25. Site Inspection Fee - General - 1 hour on site maximum $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 per hour Exempt 1 (2026) 26. Temporary Encroachment Permit -Review and Admin fee $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 27. Temporary Encroachment Permit 90 day extension $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 28. Temporary Encroachment Permit Failure to obtain permit $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 29. Temorary Encroachment Permit - Minor Security (Occupancy of space or work in soft surface blvd.) (Note 2) $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 30. Temorary Encroachment Permit - Standard Security (Work in hard surface bld or driveway) (Note 2) $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 31. Temorary Encroachment Permit - Standard Security (Work including road cuts and repairs) (Note 2) $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) 32. Municipal Land Occupancy fees (where closures are required for more than 14 days or at the City's sole discretion) a) Use of a lane of a public roadway $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 per sq.m/day Exempt 2 (2027) b) Use of a Public Sidewalk, trail or Multi use path $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 Per sq.m/week Exempt 2 (2027) c) Use of a Boulavard. $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Per sq.m/week Exempt 2 (2027) $ 100.00 $ 125.00 $ 150.00 Each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 74.00 $ 76.00 Exempt 2 (2027) $ 37.00 $ 42.00 Exempt $ 148.00 $ 152.00 2 (2027) $ 124.00 $ 128.00 2 (2027) $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 2 (2027) $ 62.00 $ 64.00 2 (2027) $ 248.00 $ 255.00 2 (2027) $ 185.00 $ 191.00 33. Municipal Consent Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1 - No Security Deposit Required Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1A - 90 day extension Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1A - Failure to obtain permit Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1B - Security deposit required Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1B - Security deposit Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1B - 90 day extension Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 1B - Failure to obtain permit Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 2 - Security deposit required** Schedule E. - Engineering Up to 3 additional months. New driveway/entrance, driveway widening or off-street parking pad 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Page 16 of 50 Page 184 of 304 Schedule E. - Engineering $ Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 2 - Security deposit Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 2 - 90 day extension $ 2,000.00 $ By-law No. 2026-XXX 2,000.00 2 (2027) 92.50 $ 95.00 2 (2027) $ 370.00 $ 381.00 2 (2027) $ 154.00 $ 159.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2 (2027) $ 77.00 $ 79.00 2 (2027) $ 308.00 $ 317.00 2 (2027) $ 5.28 $ 5.44 34. Special Services Applications (admin fee) $ 250.00 $ 250.00 35. Site Service Security - Short Side (1 lane of traffic) $ 36. Site Service Security - Long Side (2 lanes of traffic) Temporary Encroachment Permit - Form 2 - Failure to obtain permit Temporary Encroachment Permit – Form 3 – Security Deposit Required Temporary Encroachment Permit – Form 3 – Security Deposit/Occupation Payment Advance Temporary Encroachment Permit – Form 3 – 90 day extension Temporary Encroachment Permit – Form 3 – Failure to obtain permit Temporary Encroachment Permit – Form 3 – Daily Occupation Fee Scaffolding, Hoarding and/or Refuse Bin per day $ 250.00 each 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 165.00 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt Plus security deposit. 1 (2026) each Security is returned after City inspection of works. 10% is held for 12 months. 2 (2027) 20,000.00 each Security is returned after City inspection of works. 10% is held for 12 months. 2 (2027) 170.00 each Exempt 3 (2028 37. Oversize/Overweight Permit - Single move object or load (admin fee) $ 160.00 38. Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads $ by month or 30 days (maximum) (admin + road review) 285.00 $ 290.00 $ 295.00 first month Exempt 1 (2026) 39. Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads $ more than 1 month or 30 days up to 1 year (maximum) 120.00 $ 125.00 $ 130.00 per month Exempt 1 (2026) 150.00 $ 155.00 $ 160.00 per km Exempt For an approved route. 2 (2027) 250.00 $ 260.00 $ 270.00 per km Exempt For an approved route. 2 (2027) Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads $ by month or 30 days (maximum) Security Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads 41. more than 1 month or 30 days up to 1 year (maximum) $ Security 40. $ $ Schedule E. - Engineering Page 17 of 50 Page 185 of 304 Schedule E. - Engineering 42. Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads Full City Movement Security for Fuel and Water Contractors $ $ 1,000.00 See note. Development Charges 1,000.00 $ See note. 1,000.00 By-law No. 2026-XXX each Exempt See note. Only applies to bulk fuel/water companies. Does not include an approved route. 2 (2027) See the City's Development Charges by-law 3 (2028) 43. Watermain frontage fee - capital cost recovery or contribution $ 89.00 $ 92.00 $ 95.00 per metre Exempt 3 (2028) 44. Wastewater Sewer fee - capital cost recovery or contribution $ 89.00 $ 92.00 $ 95.00 per metre Exempt 3 (2028) 45. Storm Sewer fee - capital cost recovery or contribution $ 76.00 $ 78.00 $ 80.00 Exempt 3 (2028) 46. Sidewalk fee - capital cost recovery or contribution $ 136.00 $ 140.00 $ 145.00 per metre per square metre Exempt 3 (2028) $ 66.00 $ 68.00 $ 70.00 per metre Exempt 3 (2028) $ 66.00 $ 68.00 $ 70.00 per metre 50,740.00 per hectare Urban Roadway with Curb & Gutter fee - capital cost recovery or contribution Rural Roadway (paved) fee with roadside ditches - capital 48. cost recovery or contribution Stormwater Management Cash-in-lieu of construction 49. capital cost recovery or contribution 47. $ 47,828.00 $ 49,263.00 $ 3 (2028) Exempt 50. For any services not listed but provided, the City will charge incurred costs up to the actual cost incurred by the City based on staff time and materials plus a 7% overhead fee. 51. Note 1: Total Development/Construction Cost includes estimated construction value of on-site and/or off-site works (excluding dwellings and landscaping), 5% contingency costs, 7% for Engineering design, administration and inspection costs, plus HST. 52. Note 2: Bulk Securities for Temporary Encroachment Permits can be negotiated with national utility providers. Other providers can use Bulk Securities at the City's sole discretion. Schedule E. - Engineering 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page 18 of 50 Page 186 of 304 Schedule D. - Clerks Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax Notes Not required if eligible per s.16 of the Marriage Act Available where original licence issued by City of Owen Sound Includes $100 non-refundable administration fee in case of cancellation Marriage 1. Marriage Licence $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 each Exempt 2. Replacement Marriage Licence $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 each Exempt 3. Civil Marriage (Basic) - during Business Hours at City Hall $ 265.49 $ 265.49 $ 265.49 each + HST 4. Civil Marriage - during Business Hours at City Hall or Offsite $ 398.25 $ 398.25 $ 398.25 each + HST $ 398.25 $ 398.25 $ 398.25 each + HST $ 442.48 $ 442.48 $ 442.48 each +HST See note. per km + HST 5. 6. Civil Marriage - outside Business Hours at City Hall or Offsite Civil Marriage - Valentine's Day Just Say Yes Event See note. Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Includes $100 non-refundable administration fee in case of cancellation 2 (2027) Includes $100 non-refundable administration fee in case of cancellation Includes $100 non-refundable administration fee in case of cancellation Calculated in accordance with the City’s policy respecting staff mileage 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 7. Civil Marriage Service - Travel 8. Civil Marriage Service - Witness Fee $ 26.55 $ 26.55 $ 26.55 each + HST 2 (2027) 9. Civil Marriage Service - Rehearsal Fee $ 75.22 $ 75.22 $ 75.22 each + HST 2 (2027) 10. Civil Marriage - Statutory Holiday Pay $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per ceremony +HST 2 (2027) $ $ $ 77.00 3% 3% 27.00 $ 78.00 3% 3% 28.00 each of value of value each Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ 39.82 $ 39.82 $ 39.82 each + HST $ $ $ 41.00 200.00 200.00 $ $ $ 41.00 200.00 200.00 $ $ $ 41.00 200.00 200.00 each each each Exempt Exempt Exempt Lottery 11. Bingo Licence 12. Break Open Tickets 13. Raffle Licence 14. Tag Day Licence Document Commissioning 15. Commissioning Permits 16. Death Registration 17. Nuisance By-law permit application 18. Noise By-law permit application See note. By-law No. 2026-XXX Schedule D. - Clerks Not required if eligible per s.16 of the Marriage Act 2 (2027) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page Page 187 of 19 304of 50 Schedule D. - Clerks Service or Activity Business Licences 19. General Business Licence General Business Licence - Additional 20. Location General Business Licence - Not for 21 Profit 22. Home Based Business 23. Mobile Food Business Single Hawker Peddler Business weekly Single Hawker Peddler Business 25. yearly Group Hawker Peddler Business 26. special event Group Hawker Peddler Business 27. private property 28. Replacement Business Licence 29. Business Relocation 30. Change of Ownership 31. Change of Business Name Freedom of Information (FOI) Request 32. Municipal FOI Application Other Costs associated with a request under the Municipal Freedom of 33. Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA) 24. 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax By-law No. 2026-XXX Notes Review Cycle $ 255.00 $ 265.00 $ 275.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 205.00 $ 210.00 $ 215.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 155.00 $ 160.00 $ 165.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 255.00 $ 265.00 $ 275.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 275.00 $ 300.00 $ 325.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 310.00 $ 320.00 $ 330.00 7 days or less Exempt 1 (2026) $ 615.00 $ 630.00 $ 650.00 per year Exempt 1 (2026) $ 310.00 $ 320.00 $ 330.00 per event or per year Exempt per year Exempt 1 (2026) $ 2,050.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 2,150.00 Issued per event or per year, whichever is less 1 (2026) $ $ $ $ 30.00 205.00 50.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ 30.00 210.00 50.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ 35.00 215.00 60.00 60.00 each each each each Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) See note. Exempt See note. See note. See note. Schedule D. - Clerks In accordance with fees set by MFIPPA. 3 (2028) Page Page 188 of 20 304of 50 Schedule D. - Clerks Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax By-law No. 2026-XXX Notes Review Cycle AGCO Application Fees 34. Municipal Information Application Fee $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) 35. Letter of Non-Objection Property Inquiry Requests $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) 36. Lot Release Fee $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) 37. Security Reduction 38. Agreement Release 39. Certificate of Final Completion Other Fees 40. Encroachment Application Fee 41. Encroachment Agreement Fee $ $ $ 150.00 250.00 500.00 $ $ $ 150.00 250.00 500.00 $ $ $ 150.00 250.00 500.00 each each each Exempt Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ $ 400.00 600.00 $ $ 400.00 600.00 $ $ 400.00 600.00 each each Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) $ $ 125.00 40.00 $ $ 125.00 40.00 $ $ 125.00 40.00 each each Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 42. Encroachment Fee – Committee of Adjustment 43. Assignment of Lease 44. Certified copy of a by-law Schedule D. - Clerks Page Page 189 of 21 304of 50 Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services Service or Activity Permits and Inspections 1. Occupant load calculation Inspection 2. residential/apartments/condominiums/daycare s Inspection - per additional unit (up to 10 3. additional units) Inspection - max. for buildings with more than 4. 10 additional units 5. Inspection - group home 6. 7. 8. Inspection - industrial/commercial/office/multioccupancy Inspection - per tenant or occupant Inspection - buildings over $10,000 sq. feet Inspection - tent equal to or greater than 100 9. square feet Private Home & Daycare Centres initial 10. accreditation Reports 11. Copy of Incident Report/Inspection Report Fireworks 12. Storage site inspection 13. Special Occasion Permit 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax By-law No. 2026-XXX Notes Review Cycle $ 110.00 $ 113.00 $ 116.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 190.00 base fee (see below) Exempt 1 (2026) $ 20.00 $ 21.00 $ 22.00 per unit Exempt base fee + $20 per unit 1 (2026) $ 220.00 $ 225.00 $ 230.00 maximum Exempt base fee + maximum additional unit fee 1 (2026) $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 190.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 190.00 base fee (see below) Exempt 1 (2026) $ $ 110.00 110.00 $ $ 113.00 113.00 $ $ 116.00 116.00 each each Exempt Exempt $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 190.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 60.00 $ 62.00 $ 64.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ 60.00 $ 62.00 $ 64.00 per report Exempt 1 (2026) $ $ 125.00 125.00 $ $ 128.00 128.00 $ $ 130.00 130.00 each each Exempt Exempt 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services base fee + tenant/occupant fee base fee + large building fee 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Page 22 of 50 Page 190 of 304 Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Exempt 1. Should the insurer pay the coverage to the property owner, the property owner is liable to remit these funds to the municipality or its representative. 2. These cost recovery fees are HST exempt. 3. Where the Municipality believes and/or Indemnification Technology® indicates Fire Department Specific Response Fees are applicable but the Owner does not have, in part or in full, insurance coverage for fire department charges for the Property, the Municipality may adjust the Fire Department Specific Response Fees to the extent of insurance coverage upon provision by the Owner of evidence, to the satisfaction of the Municipality, that no such insurance coverage exists or to demonstrate the limits of such coverage 2 (2027) Exempt Current MTO hourly rate per hour per vehicle 2 (2027) Fire and Protective Services 14. Fire Response Fees – Indemnification Technology® 15. Security / Fire Watch / Standby Fire Department Assistance Beyond Normal 16. Requirements 17. Vehicle on King's Highway - First Hour 18. Vehicle on King's Highway - After first hour False Alarms - Equipment Malfunction (after 19. the 1st incident annually) False Alarm - Failure to notify monitoring 20. company or agency Open Burning - contrary to by-law after 1st 21. warning Current MTO Current MTO Current MTO rates plus rates plus rates plus personnel personnel personnel costs, plus any costs, plus any costs, plus any per response additional additional additional costs for each costs for each costs for each incident. incident. incident. see note see note see note see note see note see note see note per hour per firefighter, 100.00 per hour see note per hour see note per hour see note see note see note per response Exempt Current MTO hourly rate per hour per vehicle 2 (2027) see note see note see note per response Exempt Current MTO hourly rate per hour per vehicle 2 (2027) 140.00 per response Exempt Second call when by-law isn't being followed 2 (2027) 22. Hazardous Material Response Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery per response Exempt At the level set out in the Fire and Emergency Services Bylaw 2 (2027) 23. Fire Suppression - Special Equipment Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery per response Exempt As set out in the Fire and Emergency Services By-law 2 (2027) 24. Fire Suppression - Activities Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery per response Exempt As set out in the Fire Services Cost Recovery By-law 2 (2027) $ $ 100.00 140.00 $ $ 100.00 140.00 $ $ Exempt Plus materials. 2 (2027) Exempt Exempt In accordance with fees set by MTO In accordance with fees set by MTO 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services Page 23 of 50 Page 191 of 304 Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services Service or Activity Air Tank Fills 25. SCBA or SCUBA Fills 26. Large Cylinder Other Services Risk safety management plan (propane) 27. review & approval - existing 28. Risk safety management plan (propane) review & approval - new/modified Installation of smoke alarm - rented/leased residential dwelling unit Installation of carbon monoxide alarm 30. rented/leased residential dwelling unit 29. 31. Court Costs 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax By-law No. 2026-XXX Review Cycle Notes $ $ 10.00 45.00 $ $ 10.00 45.00 $ $ 10.00 45.00 each each HST Incl + HST $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 per hour Exempt Existing, 5000 USWG or Less 3 (2028) $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 per hour Exempt New or modified, 5000 USWG or Less (+ engineer, architect or firm for 3rd party review, if required, at cost) 3 (2028) $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery each Exempt Schedule F. - Fire and Emergency Services 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, not to exceed full cost recovery 3 (2028) Page 24 of 50 Page 192 of 304 Schedule G. - Parking By-law Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Parking Pass Fees 1. Daily Parking Pass $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per day 2. Monthly Parking Pass $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 per month 3. Monthly Parking Pass - Purchased after the 15th Day of the Month $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 per month 4. Monthly Overnight Parking Pass $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 per month 5. Daily Overnight Parking Pass $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per night 6. Annual Parking Pass $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 per year HST Inclusive HST Inclusive HST Inclusive HST Inclusive HST Inclusive HST Inclusive 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Street Parking Rental Fees HST Inclusive HST Inclusive 7. Daily Street Parking Space Rental $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 per day 1 (2026) 8. Weekly Street Parking Space Rental $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per week $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 each Exempt Valid until change of ownership of property 1 (2026) $ 4.50 4.50 $ 4.50 each Exempt Municipal portion only. 2 (2027) $ $ 75.00 $ 120.00 $ 75.00 $ 120.00 $ 75.00 120.00 each each Exempt Exempt per visit + HST each Exempt 1 (2026) Off-Street Parking Permits 9. Off-Street Parking Permit Application Fee Parking Court Fees 10. Municipal Court Fee Property Standards 11. Certificate of Compliance 12. Work Order $ 13. Property Clean Up - administration fee 25% of all 25% of all 25% of all expenses expenses expenses incurred by incurred by incurred by the City to the City to the City to bring bring property bring property property into into into compliance compliance compliance 14. Reinspection Fee $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 Schedule G. - Parking By-law 2 (2027) 2 (2027) $100.00 minimum charge 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Page Page 193 of 25 304of 50 Schedule G. - Parking By-law Service or Activity 2026 15. 15.a 15.b 15.c 15.d Property sub-search fees: Tax Account Subsearch Title Search - legal Registration of Order - legal Discharge of Order - legal 15.e Disbursements Property Inquiry Requests 16. Work Order Check Waste Inspections 17. Waste Inspection Waste Inspection - more than 5% recyclable 18. material by volume $ $ $ $ 100.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 2027 $ $ $ $ See note. Unit Applicable Tax 100.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 each each each each Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt See note. See note. Exempt 2028 100.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 $ $ $ $ See note. By-law No. 2026-XXX Notes In accordance with transaction fees set by Teraview. Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 each + HST 3 (2028) $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) Schedule G. - Parking By-law Page Page 194 of 26 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Ice Rentals - Fall/Winter (September 1 - March 31) 1 Non-Prime - Youth $ 119.42 $ 123.00 $ 126.69 per hour +HST Mon-Fri, 6:30am-4:30pm 1 (2026) 2 Non-Prime - Adult $ 170.61 $ 175.73 $ 181.00 per hour +HST Mon-Fri, 6:30am-4:30pm, Saturdays 4:00pm - 11:00pm. 1 (2026) 3 Prime - Youth $ 203.12 $ 209.21 $ 215.49 per hour +HST 4 $ $ $ $ $ 238.98 119.42 167.29 119.42 210.32 $ 246.15 $ $ $ $ $ 123.00 172.31 123.00 216.63 $ $ $ $ 253.53 per hour 126.69 per hour 177.48 per hour 126.69 per hour 223.13 per hour +HST 5 6 7 8 Prime - Adult School Board Hockey Canada Program Minor Sports Tournament Fee - Prime Minor Sports Tournament Fee - Non-prime Off-Season Ice Rental (April 1 - June 30) +HST +HST +HST +HST 9 Summer Ice $ 238.98 $ 246.15 $ 253.53 per hour +HST 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) All summer ice is considered primetime. 1 (2026) Last Minute Ice Rental 10 Non-Prime Last Minute Ice 11 Prime - Last Minute Ice Floor Rental 12 Non-Prime - Youth 13 Non-Prime - Adult 14 Prime - Youth 15 Prime - Adult 16 Prime - Jr. B / Sr. B Practice $ $ 122.50 153.13 $ $ 126.18 157.72 $ $ 129.96 per hour 162.46 per hour +HST +HST 1 (2026) 1 (2026) $ $ $ $ $ 55.43 92.91 79.14 132.72 105.95 $ $ $ $ $ 57.09 95.70 81.51 136.70 109.13 $ $ $ $ $ 58.81 per hour 98.57 per hour 83.96 per hour 140.80 per hour 112.40 per hour +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 17 Senior "B" Game $ 326.91 $ 336.72 $ 346.82 per game +HST This includes one hour prior to game and game time 1 (2026) 18 Junior "B" Game $ 260.98 $ 268.81 $ 276.87 per game +HST This includes one hour prior to game and game time 1 (2026) $ 2,280.12 $ 2,348.52 $ 2,418.98 per day +HST $ 3,941.61 $ 4,059.86 $ 4,181.65 per day +HST Floor Rental - Commercial Summer Commercial or $1/ticket to be paid, 19 whichever is greater Winter Commercial or $1/ticket to be paid, 20 whichever is greater Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 1 (2026) During ice season. 1 (2026) Page Page 195 of 27 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 Unit Applicable Tax 50.00 per sheet 74.00 per sheet 2028 Special Event Conversion Costs 21 End Glass Removal 22 Side Glass Removal $ $ 46.00 70.00 $ $ 48.00 72.00 $ $ 23 Wooden Floor Installation/Removal $ 1,600.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 24 25 Netting Removal - 1 net Netting Removal - 2 nets $ $ 400.00 600.00 $ $ 425.00 625.00 $ $ By-law No. 2026-XXX 1,675.00 per install/removal 450.00 per removal 650.00 per removal Notes Review Cycle +HST +HST minimum charge $500.00 minimum charge $500.00 1 (2026) 1 (2026) +HST Only applicable when ice is in. 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) +HST +HST Plus additional costs incurred by the City as determined by staff time and expenses not to exceed full cost recovery. on Arena Floor only 1 (2026) 26 Post Event Clean Up $ 700.00 $ 720.00 $ 740.00 per event 27 28 29 Chair Rentals Risers Tables $ $ $ 1.75 200.00 3.00 $ $ $ 2.00 225.00 3.25 $ $ $ 2.25 per chair 225.00 per riser 3.25 per table 30 Turf Floor Installation/Removal $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ Commercial and Occasional Users Ice Rental Permit Cancellation $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ Bayshore Community Centre Reserved Parking $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 80.00 70.00 150.00 35.00 40.00 75.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 85.00 75.00 160.00 40.00 45.00 85.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 87.55 77.25 164.80 41.20 46.35 87.55 per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour + HST + HST + HST + HST + HST + HST Minimum 8 hour rental Minimum 8 hour rental Minimum 8 hour rental Minimum 8 hour rental Minimum 8 hour rental Minimum 8 hour rental 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) $ $ $ $ 60.00 $ 50.00 $ 110.00 $ 30.00 $ 65.00 55.00 120.00 35.00 $ $ $ $ 66.95 56.65 123.60 36.05 per hour per hour per hour per hour + HST + HST + HST + HST Minimum 4 hour rental Minimum 4 hour rental Minimum 4 hour rental Minimum 4 hour rental 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 31 Prime Time Hall Rental (Saturday and Sunday) 32 Bay Room 33 Sound Room 34 R. E. Rutherford (Bay Room + Sound Room) 35 Shore Room #1 36 Shore Room #2 37 Shore Rooms 1 and 2 Monday - Friday Hall Rental 38 Bay Room 39 Sound Room 40 R. E. Rutherford (Bay Room + Sound Room) 41 Shore Room #1 1,500.00 per install/removal per cancellation per parking 350.00 permit 50.00 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation on Arena Floor only 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) +HST 2 (2027) +HST 1 (2026) + HST 1 (2026) Page Page 196 of 28 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable Tax + HST + HST 42 Shore Room #2 43 Shore Rooms 1 and 2 Hall Rental - Extras and Amenities $ $ 35.00 65.00 $ $ 40.00 75.00 44 Kitchen - Full Service (under 4 hours) $ 135.00 $ 145.00 $ 45 Kitchen - Part Service (under 4 hours) $ 80.00 $ 85.00 $ 46 Kitchen - Full Service (over 4 hours) $ 260.00 $ 275.00 $ 283.25 4+ hours + HST 47 Kitchen - Part Service (over 4 hours) $ 105.00 $ 110.00 $ 113.30 4+ hours + HST 48 Round Tables $ 100.00 $ 110.00 $ 120.00 49 Merchandise $ 500.00 $ 515.00 $ 50 Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN) $ 59.17 $ 59.17 $ 51 52 53 41.20 per hour 77.25 per hour By-law No. 2026-XXX $ $ for up to 4 hours for up to 4 87.55 hours 149.35 per day per booking + HST + HST Appliances, dishes, cutlery, glassware, etc. Using the space for storage, fridge spaces, etc. Appliances, dishes, cutlery, glassware, etc. Using the space for storage, fridge spaces, etc. 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Exempt 1 (2026) 60.95 per day + HST Increases regulated by SOCAN 1 (2026) Applies when cancellation occurs after a rental is confirmed via signature and payment but outside 30-days prior to rental. 1 (2026) $ 15.00 $ 15.00 per booking + HST After Hours Rental Fee (rental past 2:00 am) $ 175.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 per hour + HST Facility Rental Deposit and Cancellation Fee 25% of booking fee $1,000.00 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 530.45 flat rate 15.00 $1,000.00 Minimum 4 hour rental Minimum 4 hour rental 1 (2026) $ Special Event Facility Deposit Review Cycle + HST Facility Booking Administration Fee 25% of booking fee Notes 25% of per booking booking fee $1,000.00 Per Event Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 1 (2026) +HST Booking fee includes any extras included upon booking as well as any HST charged upon initial booking amount 1 (2026) Exempt Deposit tentatively holds dates for special events. Deposit is nonrefundable. Fees may be credited towards actual rental fees including damage deposits. 2 (2027) Page Page 197 of 29 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 54 Bayshore Hall Set-up/Tear down Fee 2026 2027 2028 Unit $ 200.00 $ 225.00 $ 231.75 per 4 hour block By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax + HST Notes Review Cycle Allows hall renters to book the hall the day before and/or after their event for setup or tear down. 1 (2026) Recreation Programs 2 (2027) 55 Ice Sport - Youth Non-Resident Card $ 167.00 $ 167.00 $ 167.00 per participant Exempt 56 Field or Floor Sport - Youth Non-Resident Card $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 per participant Exempt Lacrosse - Youth Non-Resident Card $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per participant Exempt Camps and Programs - Youth Non-Resident Card $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 per participant Exempt 2 (2027) of registration fee Exempt 2 (2027) 57 Short Term Camp or Program (1-4 weeks) – Youth Non-Resident Card Ice Skating 58 40% 40% 40% HST Inclusive HST Inclusive + HST + HST HST Inclusive + HST Per participant, per sport. Refer to Policy CS#19 Effective for the year 2025 ONLY 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 59 Regular Skating Admission – Single Skates $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per skate 60 Regular Skating Admission – Family Skates $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 per skate 61 62 Regular Skating Membership – Single Regular Skating Membership - Family $ $ 30.00 65.00 $ $ 30.00 65.00 $ $ 30.00 per season 65.00 per season 63 Adult Public Skating Admission – Single $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per skate 64 Adult Public Skating – Membership $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 40.00 per season 65 Shinney Hockey – Individual $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per skate HST Inclusive 2 (2027) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 140.00 170.00 185.00 220.00 235.00 280.00 245.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 145.00 175.00 190.00 225.00 245.00 285.00 255.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 150.00 per person 180.00 per person 195.00 per person 230.00 per person 255.00 per person 290.00 per person 265.00 per person Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Summer Camps (Weekly) 66 Soccer Camp (4 days) – Half Day 67 Soccer Camp (5 days) – Half Day 68 Soccer Camp (4 days) – Full Day 69 Soccer Camp (5 days) – Full Day 70 Soccer Camp – Advanced (4 days) 71 Soccer Camp – Advanced (5 days) 72 Harrison Park Sports Camp - Full Day (5 days) Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Page Page 198 of 30 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 73 Hockey Camp - Full Day (5 days) $ 74 Lacrosse Camp Full Day (5 days) $ 75 Hockey Skills Program $ 76 Power Skating Program $ 77 Power Skating Program (U16 to U18) $ 78 Program Withdrawal Administration Fee $ Outdoor Sportsfields Ball Diamond - Games 79 Class A Field - Youth $ 80 Class A Field - Adult $ 81 Class B Field - Youth $ 82 Class B Field - Adult $ 83 Class C Field - Youth $ 84 Class C Field - Adult $ Ball Diamond - Practices 85 Class A Field - Youth $ 86 Class A Field - Adult $ 87 Class B Field - Youth $ 88 Class B Field - Adult $ 89 Class C Field - Youth $ 90 Class C Field - Adult $ Ball Diamond - Weekend Tournaments 91 Class A Field - Youth $ 92 Class A Field - Adult $ 93 Class B Field - Youth $ 94 Class B Field - Adult $ 95 Class C Field - Youth $ 96 Class C Field - Adult $ Multi-use Fields (Soccer/Lacrosse/Rugby/other) - Games 97 Class A Field - Youth $ 98 Class A Field - Adult $ 99 Class D Field - Youth $ 100 Class D Field - Adult $ 2026 2027 2028 365.00 345.00 205.00 205.00 220.00 30.00 Unit per person per person per person per person per person per person By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt + HST + HST Notes Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 345.00 325.00 195.00 195.00 210.00 25.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 355.00 335.00 200.00 200.00 215.00 30.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 44.72 65.76 36.82 53.44 17.85 25.97 $ $ $ $ $ $ 46.06 67.73 37.92 55.04 18.39 26.75 $ $ $ $ $ $ 47.44 per 1.5 hours 69.76 per 1.5 hours 39.06 per 1.5 hours 56.69 per 1.5 hours 18.94 per 1.5 hours 27.55 per 1.5 hours +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 16.61 21.58 13.02 17.09 6.36 8.27 $ $ $ $ $ $ 17.11 22.23 13.41 17.60 6.55 8.52 $ $ $ $ $ $ 17.62 per 1.5 hours 22.89 per 1.5 hours 13.81 per 1.5 hours 18.13 per 1.5 hours 6.75 per 1.5 hours 8.77 per 1.5 hours +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 232.79 341.97 198.86 290.32 97.90 137.95 $ $ $ $ $ $ 239.77 352.23 204.83 299.03 100.84 142.09 $ $ $ $ $ $ 246.97 per diamond 362.80 per diamond 210.97 per diamond 308.00 per diamond 103.86 per diamond 146.35 per diamond +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST +HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 98.29 140.21 68.09 97.35 $ $ $ $ 101.24 144.42 70.13 100.27 $ $ $ $ 104.28 per 2 hours 148.75 per 2 hours 72.24 per 2 hours 103.28 per 2 hours +HST +HST +HST +HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 8-week program 8-week program 8-week program 3 (2028) Page Page 199 of 31 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 Multi-use Fields (Soccer/Lacrosse/Rugby/other) - Practices 101 Class A Field - Youth $ 102 Class A Field - Adult $ 103 Class D Field - Youth $ 104 Class D Field - Adult $ Park Facility Rental (Indoor) Harrison Park Community Centre - Non Prime 105 $ (Monday-Friday) Harrison Park Community Centre - Prime 106 $ (Saturday and Sunday) Park Covered Structure Rental (Outdoor) 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 24.55 35.07 17.11 24.55 $ $ $ $ 25.29 36.12 17.62 25.29 $ $ $ $ 26.05 per 1.5 hours 37.21 per 1.5 hours 18.15 per 1.5 hours 26.05 per 1.5 hours +HST +HST +HST +HST 45.00 $ 46.35 $ 47.74 per hour + HST Minimum of 5 hours 1 (2026) 50.00 $ 51.50 $ 53.05 per hour + HST Minimum of 8 hours 1 (2026) 6+ hrs @ day rate - Full shelter rental only. 1 (2026) 107 Harrison Park Picnic Shelter $ 130.00 $ 135.00 $ 140.00 per day + HST Harrison Park Bandshell $ 35.60 $ 36.67 $ 37.77 per day + HST J. Irvine Brown Park Gazebo (Bayshore Gazebo) $ 35.60 $ 36.67 $ 37.77 per hour + HST Minimum of 2 hour rental 1 (2026) J. Irvine Brown Park Gazebo (Bayshore Gazebo) $ 207.65 $ 213.88 $ 220.30 per day + HST between 9:00 am and 9:00 pm 1 (2026) Boley Memorial Arbour - Harrison Park $ 35.60 $ 36.67 $ 37.77 per hour +HST 1 (2026) 108 Other Gazebos and Approved Open Park Spaces $ 35.60 $ 36.67 $ 37.77 per hour +HST Minimum of 2 hour rental Minimum 2 hour rental to a maximum of 7 hours for the day. Including but not limited to: Harrison Park Bandshell, Kelso Beach Gazebo, J.Irvine Brown Park Gazebo (Bayshore), Boley Memorial Arbour and Black History Cairn. 109 Kelso Beach at Nawash Park - Amphitheatre Park Special Event Venues Rental 110 Victoria Park $ 140.00 $ 150.00 $ 160.00 per day + HST 1 (2026) $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 per day + HST 1 (2026) Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 1 (2026) 2 (2027) Page Page 200 of 32 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax 111 Kelso Beach at Nawash Park - Under 4 hrs including non-profit $ 187.51 $ 193.14 $ 198.93 per day + HST 112 Kelso Beach at Nawash Park - Over 4 hrs including non-profit $ 375.14 $ 386.39 $ 397.99 per day + HST Notes Non-profit event is an activity/event organized by a non-profit organization or a board of volunteers where all proceeds are directed back to the event or future program related costs. Fee includes setup & teardown days. For Profit (commercial) means any individual, company or organization engaged in the pursuit of business for profit through the use of city-owned facilities where there is an anticipated attendance of 1,000. Where a large commercial event donates 25% of its net profits to registered non profit organization or the City, the applicable non profit rate will apply. Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Kelso Beach at Nawash Park - For Profit 113 (Commercial) - or $1.10/ticket to be paid, whichever is greater $ 722.62 $ 744.30 $ 766.63 per day + HST 114 Kelso Beach at Nawash Park- Setup and Tear Down $ 262.50 $ 270.38 $ 278.49 per event + HST 2 (2027) 115 J. Irvine Brown Grounds Farmers Market Rental 116 Farmer's Market - Under 4 hours 117 Farmer's Market - Over 4 hours 118 Farmer's Market - Commercial Campgrounds 119 Harrison Park Campground - Nightly 120 Harrison Park Heritage Cabin - nightly 121 Harrison Park Heritage Cabin - weekly 122 Kelso Campground - Nightly $ 474.63 $ 488.87 $ 503.53 per day + HST 2 (2027) $ $ $ 86.82 144.70 289.41 $ $ $ 89.42 149.04 298.09 $ $ $ 92.11 per hour 153.51 per hour 307.04 per hour + HST + HST + HST 2 (2027) $ $ $ $ 57.35 223.94 1,530.26 53.81 $ $ $ $ 59.07 230.66 1,576.17 55.42 $ $ $ $ 60.84 per night 237.58 per night 1,623.45 per week 57.09 per night + HST + HST + HST + HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 123 Kelso Campground - Salmon Spectacular Rate $ 50.26 $ 51.77 $ 53.32 per night + HST Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) During Salmon Spectacular Derby Only 3 (2028) Page Page 201 of 33 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax 124 Campground and Cabin Reservation Changes $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 each Exempt 125 Firewood 126 Ice 127 Harrison Park Waste Tank Pump Out $ $ $ 10.62 7.00 30.00 $ $ $ 10.62 7.00 30.00 $ $ $ 10.62 per bag 7.00 per bag or block 30.00 per dump + HST + HST + HST 128 Derby Camping - Vehicle Licence $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 each +HST 129 Derby Camping - Operator's Licence 130 Derby Camping - Licence Replacement Harrison Park Outdoor Heated Swimming Pool Day Passes 131 Infant 132 Child/Youth 133 Adult $ $ 125.00 50.00 $ $ 125.00 50.00 $ $ 125.00 each 50.00 each Exempt Exempt $ $ Free 5.31 7.08 $ $ Free 5.31 7.08 134 Family $ 20.35 $ Season Passes 135 Child/Youth 136 Adult $ $ 110.62 150.44 137 Family $ Review Cycle per change request 3 (2028) For non-registered camper Includes a 25% non-refundable administration fee in case of cancellation 14 days or more before the beginning of the licence period. 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) under 3 with paying adult 3-17 years old 18+ years old maximum of 5 immediate familiy members 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 3-17 years old 18+ years old maximum of 5 immediate familiy members 1 (2026) 1 (2026) + HST up to maximum of 80 swimmers 1 (2026) 185.84 per hour + HST up to maximum of 80 swimmers 1 (2026) $ 199.12 per hour + HST up to maximum of 80 swimmers 1 (2026) $ 260.00 + HST One 1.5 hour free public swim event. City will issue tax receipt. 1 (2026) $ $ Free per swim 5.31 per swim 7.08 per swim + HST + HST 20.35 $ 20.35 per swim + HST $ $ 110.62 150.44 $ $ 110.62 per season 150.44 per season + HST + HST 327.43 $ 327.43 $ 327.43 per season + HST $ 252.21 $ 252.21 $ 252.21 per hour $ 185.84 $ 185.84 $ 140 Schools and Non-Profit Organizations - instructional $ 199.12 $ 199.12 141 Swim Sponsorship - Free Public Swim $ 252.00 $ 260.00 Rentals 138 Private Rentals Schools and Non-Profit Organizations - non 139 instructional Notes per 1.5 hour swim event Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Page Page 202 of 34 304of 50 Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax 142 Swim Sponsorship - Season - Free Public Swim $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 per season + HST Boat Launch and Dockage 143 Daily Launch Pass 144 Season Launch Pass $ $ 12.39 111.50 $ $ 13.27 115.04 $ $ + HST + HST 145 Daily dockage $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 146 Overnight dockage $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 14.16 per day 119.47 per season per foot, per 2.00 day per foot, per 2.00 night 147 Commemorative Tree Program $ 385.72 $ 385.72 $ 385.72 per tree 148 Commemorative Bench Program $ 4,113.18 $ 4,113.18 $ 4,113.18 per bench $ 130.00 $ 135.00 $ Notes Review Cycle Two free public swim events per week (Thursday from 4:00pm to 5:30pm and Sundays from noon to 3:00pm.) Includes recognition on pool sign. City will issue tax receipt 1 (2026) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) only charged during fishing derbies 2 (2027) only charged during fishing derbies 2 (2027) + HST Includes: tree, planting, name plaque at Commemorative Tree Monument. City will issue a donation receipt. 2 (2027) + HST Includes: bench, pad and plaque. City will issue a donation receipt. 2 (2027) + HST rental is only available for events held in City facilities. 2 (2027) + HST Commemorative Programs Garbage Drum Supply 149 Delivery and Pickup of Garbage Drums per minimum 5 140.00 garbage drums Schedule H. - Parks and Recreation Page Page 203 of 35 304of 50 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 2026 2027 By-law No. 2026-XXX 2028 Unit Applicable Tax Planning Act Tariff of Fees1 Review Cycle Notes up to 4 technical studies including Planning Justification Report 5 or more technical studies including Planning Justification Report up to 4 technical studies including Planning Justification Report 5 or more technical studies including Planning Justification Report up to 4 technical studies including Planning Justification Report 5 or more technical studies including Planning Justification Report 1 (2026) 1. Official Plan Amendment - minor $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 each Exempt 2. Official Plan Amendment - major $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 each Exempt 3. Zoning By-law Amendment - minor $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 each Exempt 4. Zoning By-law Amendment - major $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 each Exempt $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 each Exempt $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 each Exempt $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) $ $ 1,000.00 7,000.00 $ $ 1,000.00 7,000.00 $ $ 1,000.00 7,000.00 each base fee per lot or block Exempt Exempt 1 (2026) 1 (2026) each Exempt 8. Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment combined - minor Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment combined - major Zoning By-law Amendment (Removal of Holding Symbol) Extension of Temporary Use By-law 9. Draft Plan of Subdivision 10. Draft Plan of Subdivision - Each Revision, Extension, Amendment to Conditions $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 11. Draft Plan of Subdivision - minor redline revision $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Exempt 12. Draft Plan of Subdivision - major redline revision $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Exempt 13. Model Home Agreement $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ Draft Plan of Condominium (other than standard) $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 14. 15. Draft Plan of Condominium (standard) 5. 6. 7. + $100.00 + $100.00 + $100.00 $ 4,000.00 + $100.00 + $100.00 $ 4,000.00 $ per application 3,000.00 base fee per unit or + $100.00 parcel 4,000.00 each 1,000.00 Schedule I. - Planning Exempt Maximum of $20,000 total (base fee + lot or block fee) Applies per applicant-initaited change to the approved draft plan or approved conditions. number of lots or blocks is not changing more than 10% and there are less than 3 updated studies that accompany the application number of lots or block is changing more than 10% and there are more than 4 updated studies that accompany the application 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Exempt 1 (2026) Exempt 1 (2026) Exempt Exempt Maximum of $7,000 total (base fee + lot or block fee) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Page 36 of 50 Page 204 of 304 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 16. 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 base fee Exempt $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per unit Exempt $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 base fee Exempt +$50.00 fee per dwelling unit Exempt Site Plan Approval - Minor 17. 18. Site Plan Approval - Residential +$50.00 $ 19. Site Plan Approval 5,000.00 + $50.00 +$50.00 $ 5,000.00 + $50.00 $ 5,000.00 + $50.00 base fee per m2 of floor area Schedule I. - Planning Review Cycle Notes 1. Maximum of $5000 total (base fee + unit fee) 2. 10 residential units or less within 120 m of a shoreline 3. Development where there is an existing site plan agreement registered on title and where the applicant is proposing a minor modification to the existing approvals. Minor modifications are changes to the existing approvals that do not impact the functionality of the site and do not normally require changes to existing studies such as stormwater management report, functional servicing study, traffic impact study, etc. 4. Developments on sites without existing site plan agreements where the proposed development does not alter the existing site layout including site access, stormwater management systems, municipal servicing, etc. changes may include repainting the existing parking area, providing accessible parking spaces, entrances and adding landscaping. Total fee = base fee + fee per dwelling unit. Maximum fee $10,000 11 residential units or more 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt Exempt 2 (2027) Total fee = base fee + per area fee. Maximum fee $10,000. 2 (2027) Page 37 of 50 Page 205 of 304 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 2026 $ 20. 2,200.00 $ 2028 2,200.00 includes 1 severed lot 2,200.00 or easement and 1 retained Exempt each additional severed lot + $850.00 or easement affecting the same original lot Exempt Consent to Sever + $850.00 Actual costs plus 20% admin fee Applicable Tax 2027 $ + $850.00 Actual costs plus 20% admin fee Actual costs plus 20% admin fee 21. Agreement as a condition of consent 22. The lesser of: $803/m of frontage; OR $16/m2 of lot area; OR 5% Residential cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication of a land sale - consent valuation made within two years of the consent application approval 23. Minor Variance - 1 zoning provision $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 24. Minor Variance - 2 or more zoning provisions $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ The lesser of: The lesser of: $803/m of $803/m of frontage; OR frontage; OR 2 $16/m of lot $16/m2 of lot area; OR 5% of area; OR 5% of a land sale a land sale valuation made valuation made within two within two years of the years of the consent consent application application approval approval Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX each Review Cycle Notes 2 (2027) Requires separate application form, must affect same original lot and be applied for at the same time as original consent 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt The lower rate shall be applied. The calculation shall be applied to the severed lot(s) where a consent aplication has been approved. 2 (2027) Each Exempt 1,000.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) 1,500.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) Schedule I. - Planning Page 38 of 50 Page 206 of 304 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 25. Pre-Consultation - Standard 2026 $ 2,000.00 2027 $ 2,000.00 $ By-law No. 2026-XXX 2028 Unit Applicable Tax Review Cycle 2,000.00 each Exempt Per Submission. Same fee for Subdivision, Condominium, Site Plan, Offical Plan Amendment or Zoning By-law Amendment pre-consult. 2 (2027) each Exempt A. Development where there is an existing site plan agreement registered on title and where the applicant is proposing a minor modification to the existing approvals. minor modifications are changes to the existing approvals that do not impact the functionality of the site and do not normally require changes to existing studies such as stormwater management report, functional servicing study, traffic impact study etc. B. Development on sites without existing site plan agreements where the proposed development does not alter the existing site layout including site access, stormwater management systems, municipal servicing, etc. Changes may include repainting the existing parking area, providing accessible parking spaces, entrances, and adding landscaping. 2 (2027) each base fee per lot or block Exempt As per City Official Plan Exempt Maximum of $10,000. Would apply if agreement required as condition of consent as well as draft plan of subdivision. Notes 26. Pre-Consultation Fee - Minor Site Plan Approval 27. Cost Recovery Fees (peer reviews, etc.) 28. Final Subdivision Approval and Agreement 29. Final Condominium Approval and Agreement $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) 30. Exemption Request (Draft Plan of Condominium) $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 base fee 31. Part Lot Control By-law 32. Miscellaneous/Other Agreement $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Actual cost Actual cost Actual cost $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 + $50.00 + $50.00 Actual costs plus 20% admin fee + $50.00 + $50.00 Actual costs plus 20% admin fee + $50.00 + $50.00 Actual costs plus 20% admin fee per lot or block per agreement Schedule I. - Planning 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 3 (2028) Exempt Exempt Maximum $2000.00 total (base fee + lot or block fee) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page 39 of 50 Page 207 of 304 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 33. Cash-in-lieu of parking Property Inquiry Requests 34. Planning/Zoning Information (2010-078) Planning/Zoning Conformity Checks (201035. 078 or 1985-80) 36. Planning/Zoning Information (1976-100) 37. Heritage Registry Notice Street Furniture/Sidewalk Patios 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle 1. Requires an agreement pursuant to the Planning Act that meets with the satisfaction of the City's Planning Division. 2. Applicable to lands: a. located with the City's OP River District Commercial designation; and b. zoned as C1 zone as defined in the City's Zoning By-law. 3 (2028) $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 per parking space Exempt $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) $ $ 150.00 25.00 $ $ 150.00 25.00 $ $ 150.00 25.00 each each Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 1. For first-year street furniture, frontage patio and/or curbside patio. 2. No charge for renewals where there are no changes proposed to the street furniture or patio layout, and a patio agreement has been executed with the City and the term of the agreement has not expired. 38. Street Furniture, Frontage Patio and/or Curbside Patio $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per business Exempt 39. Curb Lane Patio $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 per stall per month Exempt $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 each + HST $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 each + HST $ $ 250.00 200.00 $ $ 250.00 200.00 $ $ 250.00 200.00 each each Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) Various Documents and Services 40. Custom Base Maps - Basic (8 1/2 x 14) Custom Base Maps - detailed customization 41. (8 1/2X14) 42. Fence Viewers Fee 43. Appeal - Property Standards Order Appeal - Ontario Land Tribunal - processing 44. fee Schedule I. - Planning Located in a maximum of two (2) on-street parking stalls. Fee for customized base maps from the City's digital topographic maps 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Page 40 of 50 Page 208 of 304 Schedule I. - Planning Service or Activity 45. 2026 2027 2028 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ Appeal - Ontario Land Tribunal - staff attendance 46. Unit first day or portion thereof each 750.00 additional day 2,500.00 By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Exempt 3 (2028) Exempt 3 (2028) Notes: 1 47. For any application where a technical study completed in support of the application is determined by the City of Owen Sound to require a peer review, such peer review will be coordinated by the City of Owen Sound and paid for by the applicant. Schedule I. - Planning 3 (2028) Page 41 of 50 Page 209 of 304 Schedule J. - Public Works Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Review Cycle Notes Downtown Sidewalk Snow Removal 1. Downtown Snow Removal Services Public Works Division - Water/Wastewater 2. Water and Sewer After Hours Call Sewer Camera Inspections - Private 3. Property 4. Water Main Tap - 50mm or smaller 5. Water Main Tap - Greater Than 50mm 6. Bulk Water Sales - Administration Fee $ 123.00 $ 123.00 $ per standard storefront 123.00 (8m), per invoice $ 450.00 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) $ 450.00 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 each Exempt 2 (2027) $ $ $ 520.00 1,460.00 75.00 $ $ $ 530.00 1,490.00 75.00 $ $ $ 530.00 1,490.00 75.00 Exempt Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Exempt Charged on all monthly bulk water invoices. Bulk water is measured in cubic meters (m3). Sales will 3 (2028) be rounded to the nearest cubic metre. 1 (2026) Exempt 2 (2027) 8. Fire Hydrant Use - Water Meter Deposit Fire Hydrant Use - Backflow Preventer 9. Deposit $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 each each monthly first block rate each $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 per use Exempt 2 (2027) Water & Sanitary & Storm Connection $ 23,150.00 $ 23,650.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) Water & Sanitary Connection $ 20,000.00 $ 20,500.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) Sanitary Sewer connection $ 17,450.00 $ 17,800.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) 10. Sewer Connection Inspection $ 350.00 $ 350.00 each Exempt Water Connection $ 8,700.00 $ 8,900.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) Water Service Removal $ 2,400.00 $ 2,450.00 each Exempt 1 (2026) 11. Septage Dumping Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 per cubic metre + HST each Based on actual costs. 7. Bulk Water Sales 12. Maintaining water quality during phased development 2x Cost Recovery 2x Cost Recovery 2x $ $ 350.00 25.00 Cost Recovery Schedule J. - Public Works + HST For inspection of site servicing or similar. 1 (2026) For septage hauled and dumped at the City's Wastewater plant. Meter and bill at regular water rates. Developer is responsible for cost of meter. Incurred costs as determined by staff time and materials not exceeding actual costs. 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Page 42 of 50 Page 210 of 304 Schedule J. - Public Works 13. Contractor/Developer Support 14. New Build Water Meter 15. Supervision of Sanitary repair or connection Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery By-law No. 2026-XXX each Based on actual costs. Actual costs incurred based on staff time not exceeding 1 (2026) actual costs. each Based on actual costs. Actual costs incurred as determined by staff time and materials not exceeding actual costs, including cost of meter by size, radio read box and one visit to turn-on and inspect. 1 (2026) each Based on actual costs. Actual costs incurred as determined by staff time and materials not exceeding actual costs. 1 (2026) Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery 16. Road Closure -Single area set up $ 486.73 $ 486.73 $ 486.73 per event +HST 3 (2028) 17. Road Closure - Multiple areas set up 18. Road Closure - Detour set up $ $ 707.96 221.24 $ $ 707.96 221.24 $ $ 707.96 221.24 per event per event +HST +HST 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 2x per event Events* 19. Road Closures and Detours - After Hours 2x 2x 20. Event Barrel Usage $ 4.42 $ 4.42 $ 4.42 Each 21. Event Barricade Usage $ 13.27 $ 13.27 $ 13.27 Each 22. *Event Fees including road closures, detours, barrels and barricades are only charged to for-profit events. Schedule J. - Public Works +HST +HST To set up detour signs Event fees for road closures and detour set ups are charged at 2x the rate when required outside of regular 3 (2028) working hours (7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 2 (2027) Page 43 of 50 Page 211 of 304 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Service or Activity Property Tax Division 1. Tax and Water/Wastewater Certificate 2. Tax and Water/Wastewater Certificate - Rush Tax and Water/Wastewater Certificate - Virtual City 3. Hall 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax $ $ 80.00 100.00 $ $ 80.00 100.00 $ $ 80.00 100.00 Per certificate Per certificate Exempt Exempt $ 70.00 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 Per certificate Exempt Notes Review Cycle emailed within 5-14 business days emailed within 1-3 business days immediate production through Virtual City Hall; for approved requestors enrolled in VCH only only applies to mortgage renewals or properties without water services i.e. condos - emailed within 514 business days only applies to mortgage renewals or properties without water services i.e. condos - emailed within 1-3 business days For emailed or printed copies For emailed or printed copies For emailed or printed copies 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 4. Stand Alone Tax Certifcate $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Per certificate Exempt 5. Stand Alone Tax Certifcate - Rush $ 70.00 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 Per certificate Exempt 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Statement of Taxes Paid Detailed Property Tax Statement Tax Bill Reprint Ownership Change/Title Change Fee Mortgage Company Administration Fee Property Standards amounts added to the Tax roll Interest On Arrears Reminder Notice Fee $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 15.00 $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 1.25% 15.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 15.00 $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 1.25% 15.00 $ 10.00 25.00 15.00 30.00 10.00 25.00 1.25% 15.00 Per occurrence Per occurrence Per bill Per ownership change Per property tax acccount Per occurrence per month Per occurrence Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 14. Early Warning Letter Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Per occurrence Exempt 15. Registered Mail Fee $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 Per occurrence Exempt $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 Per occurrence Exempt Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, not to exceed full cost recovery Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) 16. Final Notice Fee - Prior to Tax Sale Registration Tax Sale Registration Process Fees Determination if the property is eligible for Sales Process; obtain description of lands; search title to determine names of interested parties; prepare Tax 17. Arrears Certificate; Subsearch title to determine changes to interested parties; Register Tax Arrears Certificate Invoiced bi-annually after interim and final billing For arrears greater than $100. Applicable for properties eligible for tax sale proceedings 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) For properties eligible for tax sale proceedings 1 (2026) 18. If cancellation price is paid, prepare and register a tax arrears cancellation certificate Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, not to exceed full cost recovery Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) 19. Cost determined based on staff and legal If cancellation price is not paid within prescribed time expenses, not to exceed full cost frame, Treasurer to send notice to parties in 1 (f). Note: recovery statutory declaration to be prepared and retained Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance 44 of 50 Page 212Page of 304 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle 20. If extension agreement requested, presentation of request to Council, preparation of by-law to authorize agreement for passage by Council and to monitor agreement. Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, not to exceed full cost recovery Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) 21. If cancellation price not paid within required time frame Cost determined based on staff and legal of registering tax arrears certificate and no extension expenses, not to exceed full cost agreement is in effect, the Treasurer makes statutory recovery declaration indicating to whom final notices were sent Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) 22. Treasurer advertises and sells property Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, not to exceed full cost recovery Per occurrence Based on actual costs incurred 1 (2026) Water Billing Division 23. Stand Alone Water & Wastewater Certificate $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Per certificate Exempt 24 25. Water & Wastewater Account Statement/History Water & Wastewater Bill Reprint $ $ 10.00 15.00 $ $ 10.00 15.00 $ $ 10.00 15.00 Exempt Exempt 26. Water Account Ownership or Tenancy Change Fee $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Interest On Arrears Reminder Notice Fee Past Due Notice Fee Disconnection Notice Fee Water & Wastewater Arrears Transfer to Tax Water Disconnect Fee - Non Payment Water Reconnect Fee After Hours Turn On/Off Fee Water Turn off Fee - Seasonal Water Turn on Fee - Seasonal Leak adjustment administration fee $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1.50% 5.00 15.00 35.00 35.00 60.00 50.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1.50% 5.00 15.00 35.00 35.00 60.00 50.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1.50% 5.00 15.00 35.00 35.00 60.00 50.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 Per occurrence Per bill Per ownership or tenancy change Per month Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence Per occurrence 38. Water Mater Inspection Fee $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Per occurrence Exempt 39. Water Meter Inspection - Missed Appointment Fee $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Per occurrence Exempt 40. Water Meter Testing Fees Cost Recovery Per occurrence Exempt Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Applicable only for properties that do not remit property taxes to the City of Owen Sound - e.g. Georgian Bluffs and/or Meaford Properties on City water services For emailed or printed copies For emailed or printed copies 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt 3 (2028) Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) 3 (2028) In addition to standard turn on/off fees Applicable if no indication of water meter functionality issue if ratepayer requesting appointment; does not apply for regular service appointments Applicable if ratepayer requested water meter inspection appointment is missed Fee to be applied if meter functionality is confirmed to be within guidelines 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 1 (2026) 45 of 50 Page 213Page of 304 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Per month Exempt 41. Water Meter Installation Refusal - Administration Fee 42. Property owners who refuse installation of an automated water meter and later elect to convert to one must pay the full cost of installation. $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Notes Review Cycle 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 46 of 50 Page 214Page of 304 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Notes Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Residential Consumption Rates (*For all accounts unless deemed otherwise as a large consumption user by the City) 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 2026 2027 2028 Unit 3 Usage 0 - 110 m per month Water Monthly Consumption Charges Water Monthly Service Charges 3 2026 water Water and Water and and waste waste water waste water water rates rates are rates are will be reviewed and reviewed and proposed in set annually set annually May 2026. Usage >110 m per month 15 mm (5/8") / per month 18 mm (3/4") / per month 25 mm (1") / per month 38 mm (1.5") / per month 50 mm (2") / per month 75 mm (3") / per month 100 mm (4") / per month 150 mm (6") / per month 200 mm (8") / per month 3 Exempt 1 cubic metre (m ) = 1,000 litres (L) Exempt Based on Water Meter Diameter Exempt Total Water Charges = Water Monthly Consumption Charges + Water Monthly Service Charges 55. Wastewater Charges 56. 57. All rates shown are for properties within the boundaries of the City of Owen Sound. Rates for properties outside of the City boundaries are double the amounts shown above. The billing rate for outstanding manual-meter accounts is based on the prior year's average monthly consumption. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. Large Consumption Rates (*Only for grandfathered accounts deemed as a large consumption user by the City of Owen Sound) 2026 2027 2028 Unit Applicable TaxNotes 3 Usage 0 - 110 m per month Water Monthly Consumption Charges Exempt 1 cubic metre (m3) = 1,000 litres (L) 3 Usage >110 m per month 2026 water 50 mm (2") / per month Water and Water and and waste 75 mm (3") / per month waste water waste water water rates Water Monthly Service Charges Exempt Based on Water Meter Diameter 100 mm (4") / per month rates are rates are will be 150 mm (6") / per month reviewed and reviewed and proposed in 200 mm (8") / per month set annually set annually May 2026. Total Water Charges = Water Monthly Consumption Wastewater Charges of Total Water Charges Exempt Charges + Water Monthly Service Charges 65. of Total Water Charges 66. All rates shown are for properties within the boundaries of the City of Owen Sound. Rates for properties outside of the City boundaries are double the amounts shown above. 67. 68. Ratepayers shall pay fixed service charges (monthly water service charge + associated sewer surcharge), regardless of if water service has been turned off at the curb. The billing rate for outstanding manual-meter accounts is based on the prior year's average monthly consumption. Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance 47 of 50 Page 215Page of 304 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Applies to all departments unless a specific fee has been established 1 (2026) Finance Division 69. 70. 71. Photocopy Fee (per page) Returned/NSF/Stopped Cheque Fee Returned Payment Processing Fee Replacement Cheque Fee $ 0.50 $ 0.50 $ 0.50 Per page HST Inclusive $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 Per incident Exempt $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Per cheque 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Grace for first occurence. 72. Payment Reallocation Fee $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Per payment Exempt To redistribute, allocate or transfer payments to correct account or to refund the payment. Includes electronic payments. 1 (2026) 73. 74. Interest on Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Transfer to Tax Roll Fee 1.50% 35.00 $ 1.50% 35.00 $ 1.50% 36.00 Per month Per transfer Exempt Exempt all Departments excluding tax and water $ 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Applied in accordance Cost determined based on staff and legal expenses, with actual not to exceed full cost recovery costs incurred Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Per registration Per agreement Exempt Per hour Exempt 75. Property Lien Registration Fee 76. Development Charges Exemption Agreement fee $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 77. Detailed Account Analysis $ $ $ 70.00 70.00 70.00 Schedule K. - Tax, Water Finance 1 (2026) 1 (2026) Including detailed review of tax, water and AR accounts; not applicable to FOI requests or if due to billing error 1 (2026) 48 of 50 Page 216Page of 304 Schedule L. - Transit Service or Activity Cash Fares 1. 1 - 5 Years 2. Students 3. All Others Day Passes 4. Day Pass 5. 10-day Pass Monthly Passes 6. Pre-School 2026 $ $ $ $ 2027 2028 No Charge No Charge No Charge 2.75 $ 2.75 $ 2.75 3.25 $ 3.25 $ 3.25 9.00 27.00 $ $ No Charge 9.00 27.00 $ $ No Charge 9.00 27.00 Unit By-law No. 2026-XXX Applicable Tax Review Cycle Notes each each Exempt Exempt Exempt 2 (2027) 2 (2027) 2 (2027) each each Exempt Exempt 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Exempt 3 (2028) No Charge 7. Elementary Students $ 37.50 $ 37.50 $ 37.50 per month Exempt Subject to current reduced rate as approved by Council 3 (2028) 8. High School, College or Mature Student $ 37.50 $ 37.50 $ 37.50 per month Exempt Subject to current reduced rate as approved by Council 3 (2028) 9. Senior Citizen (65+) 10. Adult $ $ 57.50 72.50 $ $ 57.50 72.50 $ $ 57.50 72.50 per month per month Exempt Exempt 11. Affordable Fare $ 57.50 $ 57.50 $ 57.50 per month Exempt $ 165.00 $ 165.00 $ 165.00 each Exempt 3 (2028) Semester Pass 12. Semester Pass Other Fares 13. Trainers of Dogs from Canine Vision Canada 14. Support person accompanying a person with a disability 3 (2028) 3 (2028) Requires current ODSP or OW statement or verification letter for proof of income support 3 (2028) No Charge No Charge No Charge each Exempt 1 (2026) No Charge No Charge No Charge each Exempt 1 (2026) Schedule L. - Transit Page 49 of 50 Page 217 of 304 Schedule M. - Waste Service or Activity 2026 2027 2028 By-law No. 2026-XXX Unit Applicable Tax Notes Review Cycle Individual bag tags sold at City Hall, Public Works or the Library, otherwise tags must be sold in strips of five. 1 (2026) Waste Management Fees 1. Bag Tag $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 each Exempt 2. 3. Earth Machine Composter Kitchen Compost Container $ $ 30.98 6.30 $ $ 30.98 6.30 $ $ 30.98 6.30 each each +HST +HST 4. Replacement Green Bin $ 30.98 $ 30.98 $ 30.98 Schedule M. - Waste +HST 2 (2027) 2 (2027) Fee for a replacement green bin. Applies if the bin is not stored properly or is missing. 2 (2027) Page 50 of 50 Page 218 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity ADMINISTRATIVE Shelter Fees CHANGE A. Animal Control A. Animal Control - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information With the new Animal Control Contract, specific fee amounts are no longer listed in the contract itself; $ $ therefore the asterisks and note referencing the old contract have been removed from the By-law. ADMINISTRATIVE Release of Ownership Fees CHANGE $ FEE CHANGE Replacement Dog Tag $ 10.00 $ Docupet has implemented a $4.00 per tag processing fee 14.00 to be deducted from the City's remittance for replacement tags. This fee is being increased to cover this cost. FEE CHANGE Replacement Cat Tag $ 10.00 $ Docupet has implemented a $4.00 per tag processing fee 14.00 to be deducted from the City's remittance for replacement tags. This fee is being increased to cover this cost. - $ - Changed to HST Exempt as per CRA. 1 of 12 Page 219 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity ADMINISTRATIVE Overtime Charges CHANGE C. Cemetery C. Cemetery - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Clarification added that the fee is charged for every 0.5 $ 115.51 $ 121.28 hours worked outside of regular working hours (7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.) 2 of 12 Page 220 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity FEE CHANGED Mobile Food Business License D. Clerks D. Clerks - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information $ 250.00 $ Increased by approximately 10% annually over the next 3 years. This is to align with comparator municipalities, which have fees varying from $240 to $700. Additionally, 275.00 this considers that mobile food businesses do not have to pay property taxes or building fees to the City as a general business would. 3 of 12 Page 221 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes E. Engineering E. Engineering - Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information ADMINISTRATIVE Servicing Agreement and Subdivision Note added that these will be substantially reviewed in CHANGE Agreement Preparation Fees 2028 as they are still relatively new fees. NEW FEE Servicing or Pre-servicing Agreement Preparation - Stand Alone Agreement Staff Delegated Minor NEW FEE Servicing or Pre-servicing Agreement Preparation - Stand Alone Agreement Staff Delegated Major NEW FEE Capital Contribution or Cost Sharing Agreement Council approved agreement - $ By-law required NEW FEE Design Review - Servicing Agreement Works Review - Construction Costs less than $100,000 (where not included in Development review fees) (Note 1) $ $ - $ Now that there is delegated approval for select simple servicing agreements, these lower fees for these 1,000.00 instances reflect that there is less staff time required for these as they do not require a council report and execution. - $2,000.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* Now that there is delegated approval for select simple servicing agreements, these lower fees for these instances reflect that there is less staff time required for these as they do not require a council report and execution. - $2,500.00 plus all legal fees and agreement registration* New agreement types that capture items not included in the previously noted servicing agreement fees. Formalizes the fees and provides clarity to developers by having them listed separately as they were charged under other agreements/fees previously. - New agreement types that capture items not included in the previously noted servicing agreement fees. Formalizes 4.3% the fees and provides clarity to developers by having them listed separately as they were charged under other agreements/fees previously. NEW FEE Design Review - Servicing Agreement Works Review - Construction Costs more $ than $100,000 (where not included in Development review fees) (Note 1) - New agreement types that capture items not included in the previously noted servicing agreement fees. Formalizes 2.2% the fees and provides clarity to developers by having them listed separately as they were charged under other agreements/fees previously. NEW FEE Servicing Agreement - Construction Security 0% 100% NEW FEE CLI-ECA Third party or Peer review verification $ $ - Cost Recovery Formalizes security in the fees and charges by-law. This was collected previously as it is best practice. New fee to recover costs where any third party engineering verification is required. 4 of 12 Page 222 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity NEW FEES NEW FEES NEW FEE E. Engineering E. Engineering - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Temporary Encroachment Permit Fees New fee structure for temporary encroachment permit fees, replacing the previous fees that are being removed (as noted below). The new fee structure simplifies the fees and ensures cost recovery. These fees were determined based on recorded average staff time spent (approximately 3-4 hours per permit issued). A note has been added to clarify that bulk securities for national utility providers can be negotiated within individual agreements. Municipal Land Occupancy fees For use of a public roadway, sildewalk, trail, or boulevard where closures are required for more than 14 days or at the City's sole discretion. Occupancy fees have been charged in the past but this is formalizing the process. These proposed fees are similar to other municipalities. Municipal Consent FEE REMOVAL Previous Temporary Encroachment Permit Fees FEE CHANGE Special Services Applications (admin fee) $ - $ A new fee which has not been charged in the past. There has been an increase of requests coming in in recent 100.00 years. This fee is cost recovery to cover staff time, and will be reviewed in 2027 to ensure it is aligned with actual costs. Removal of previous fee structure for temporary encroachment permits as they were an outdated fee structure and no longer relevant as the listed forms for each fee are not used. These fees are replaced with a new fee structure for temporary encroachment permits as noted above. $ 121.00 $ 250.00 Fee increased to reflect actual costs and support cost recovery. 5 of 12 Page 223 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity NEW FEE E. Engineering E. Engineering - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Site Service Security - Short $ - $ These securities are held during site servicing and returned once the City has inspected the works, except for 15,000.00 10% which is held and returned after 12 months in case of issues arising. These securities are held during site servicing and returned once the City has inspected the works, except for 20,000.00 10% which is held and returned after 12 months in case of issues arising. NEW FEE Site Service Security - Long $ - $ FEE CHANGE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Single move object or load (admin fee) $ 72.00 $ 160.00 FEE CHANGE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads - by month or 30 days (maximum) (admin + road review) $ Fee increased to reflect actual costs and support cost 285.00 recovery. This includes patrol checking the road no less than 4 times. FEE CHANGE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads - more than 1 month or 30 days up to 1 year (maximum) $ 145.00 $ Fee decreased as the increased fee above includes the administrative fee This fee is applied per month for 120.00 subsequent months and does not capture an administrative fee. NEW FEE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads - by month or 30 days (maximum) Security $ - $ 150.00 New security deposit, charged per kilometre for an approved route. NEW FEE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads - more than 1 month or 30 days up to 1 year (maximum) Security $ - $ 250.00 New security deposit, charged per kilometre for an approved route. NEW FEE Oversize/Overweight Permit - Multiple move objects or loads Full City Movement Security for Fuel and Water Contractors etc. $ - $ 1,000.00 $ 110.00 Fee increased to reflect actual costs and support cost recovery. New security deposit. This one is for bulk fuel or water contractors and does not include an approved route. 6 of 12 Page 224 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity E. Engineering E. Engineering - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Note 1: Total Development/Construction Cost includes estimated construction value of on-site and/or off-site works ADMINISTRATIVE (excluding dwellings and landscaping), CHANGE 5% contingency costs, 7% for Engineering design, administration and inspection costs, plus HST. Note added. 7 of 12 Page 225 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity FEE INCREASE FEE INCREASE FEE INCREASE FEE INCREASE H. Parks and Recreation H. Parks & Recreation - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information End Glass Removal $ 34.00 $ 46.00 Increased to match actual recorded conversion costs. Side Glass Removal $ 50.00 $ 70.00 Increased to match actual recorded conversion costs. Wooden Floor Installation/Removal $ 1,350.00 $ 1,600.00 Increased to match actual recorded conversion costs. Post Event Clean Up $ 560.00 $ 700.00 Increased to match actual recorded conversion costs. NEW FEE Turf Floor Removal/Installation $ - $ FEE REMOVAL Commercial and Occasional Users Ice Rental - Permit Cancellation $ 50.00 $ FEE CHANGE Merchandise FEE REMOVAL Facility Booking Administration Fee NEW FEE Special Event Facility Deposit 20% $ $ $ 15.00 - $ $ New fee respecting the acquisition of the lacrosse turf 1,500.00 flooring in 2026. This fee will be reviewed in 2027 to ensure it reflects actual conversion costs. Fee removed as it is not used. If a renter cancels a reservation within 30 days of the booking, the full rental fee is charged. This fee is applied when a concert sells merchandise at a special event instead of issuing a Hawker Peddler 500.00 License. Fee has been changed to a flat rate so it is no longer dependent on the amount of merchandise sold. - Fee removed as it is not used. This fee is to tentatively hold dates for special events or concerts. Once this deposit is recieved and dates are held, if another booking request were to come in for one 1,000.00 of the held dates the organizer would be contacted and required to either firm up or release the held date. The introduction of this fee is to deter organizers from holding a large number of dates without payment. 8 of 12 Page 226 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity FEE REMOVAL FEE REMOVAL FEE REMOVAL FEE REMOVAL NEW FEE H. Parks and Recreation H. Parks & Recreation - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Lacrosse - Youth Non-Resident Card $ 50.00 $ - Harrison Park Bandshell $ 34.41 $ - J. Irvine Brown Park Gazebo (Bayshore Gazebo) $ 33.90 $ - Boley Memorial Arbour - Harrison Park $ 33.90 $ - Other Gazebos and Approved Open Park Spaces $ - $ This reduced fee was introduced for the 2025 season while the Bayshore was under construction and the group only had access to one facility. Going forward, the regular Field or Floor Sport Non-Resident fee of $100 applies. Consolidated into Other Gazebos and Approved Open Park Spaces Fee (see below). Consolidated into Other Gazebos and Approved Open Park Spaces Fee (see below). Consolidated into Other Gazebos and Approved Open Park Spaces Fee (see below). One hourly fee for all small gazebo and other open spaces. Including but not limited to: Harrison Park Bandshell, J. Irvine Brown Park Gazebo (Bayshore 35.65 Gazebo), Boley Memorial Arbour, Kelso Beach Gazebo and Black History Cairn. A minimum of 2 hour rental, up to a maximum charge of the cost of 7 hours for the day. 9 of 12 Page 227 of 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity Schedule J. - Public Works J. Public Works - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information FEE REMOVALS Water/Sanitary/Storm Connection fees NEW FEE Sewer Connection Inspection FEE REMOVAL Water Service Removal NEW NOTE Event Fees $ $ $ - - $ Fees for Water/Sanitary/Storm connections to be removed as the City no longer offers these services. Instead, contractor is responsible for work and the City inspects it once complete. - 350.00 For inspection of sewer services installed by contractor. $ - Fee removed as this service is no longer offered. $ - Note added to clarify that the new event fees as outlined below are only charged to for-profit events. NEW FEE Road Closure - Single Area Set up $ - $ New fee for setting up road closures for events to recover costs. Fee is for events that require the set up of a single 550.00 area/road closure. Typically this takes 2 staff approximately 3-4 hours as well as vehicle usage. NEW FEE Road Closure - Multiple Area Set up $ - $ New fee for setting up road closures for events to recover 800.00 costs. Fee is for events that require the set up of multiple areas/road closures. NEW FEE Detour Required $ - $ 250.00 New fee for events that require staff to set up detours due to event road closures. Event fees for road closures and detour set ups are 2x charged at double the regular rate if required outside of the regular working hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. NEW FEE Road Closures and Detours - After Hours $ - NEW FEE Event Barrel Usage $ - $ NEW FEE Event Barricade Usage $ - $ Charged per barrel for events. Barrels were previously provided free of charge. Charged per barricade for events. Barricades were 15.00 previously provided free of charge. 5.00 of 12 Page 228 of 10 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity K. Tax, Water Finance K. Tax, Water, Finance - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information Finance Division ADMINISTRATIVE Returned Payment Processing Fee CHANGE $ - $ - Fee title changed to reflect more inclusive use. of 12 Page 229 of 11 304 Summary of Fee Changes Service or Activity NEW FEE Green Bin M. Waste M. Waste - Summary of Fee Changes 2025 Fee Proposed Fee 2026 Rationale and Additional Information $ - $ Fee for a replacement green bin in cases where the bin is improperly stored and becomes damaged, or is missing/stolen. The fee does not apply if the bin is 30.98 damaged by contractor or during snow maintenance by the City. The fee of $30.98 plus HST ($35.00) recovers the price that the City pays for the bin. of 12 Page 230 of 12 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Mason Bellamy, Manager of Public Works & Engineering Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: OP-26-030 Subject: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-030 respecting the dedication of Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 as a highway, City Council directs staff to bring forward a by-law to dedicate Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 as a highway. Highlights: Part 5 of Plan 16R-12255 is a 5-metre parcel that runs parallel to 32nd Street East. Part 5 was transferred to the City on September 9, 2025, per Condition 26, Schedule C of the Bayshore Developments Inc. (previously known as the SkyDev Development) Site Plan Agreement. The purpose of Part 5 was parkland dedication for a multi-use trail to be constructed by the developer as part of the Master Servicing Agreement dated April 14, 2025. Part 5 was initially registered as a Park Block, but it has come to staff’s attention that, in order for the future parcels along 32nd Street East to have access from a municipally maintained road and for utilities to cross the block, the cleanest solution is to consolidate the Park Block into the Road Allowance of 32nd Street East. Staff Report OP-26-030: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 Page 1 of 4
11.g Report OP-26-030 from the Manager of Public Works and Engineering Re: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-1225
The City proposes dedicating a five-metre-wide strip of land at 3195 East Bayshore Road as a public highway. Developer Skyline Developments initiated this dedication via a Parkland Dedication Agreement in September 2025 to streamline utility and servicing access. Because a parkland block previously separated the road right-of-way from an adjacent property, legal access complications arose; converting the land to a highway resolves this. Staff recommend this route as cost-effective, requiring minimal capital or operating expenses and fitting within existing work plans. Alternatively, granting multiple service easements would consume considerable staff time, incur legal costs, and potentially encumber future property sales. City Council must approve the non-standard procurement for a wastewater treatment plant digestor clean-out, involving an eight-week shutdown where hazardous biosolids must be hauled away continuously. This work includes assessing and repairing critical equipment only accessible when the plant is offline, occurring approximately every five years. The estimated upset limit for this necessary maintenance is $309,669.93.
Page 231 of 304 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: City Building – Enhancing urban development, planning and place-making processes to create places and spaces that contribute to complete communities for existing residents, future residents and tourists. Previous Report/Authority: N/A. Background: In 2022, Skyline Developments, operating as Bayshore Street Developments Inc., started the Site Plan Approval process for 3195 East Bayshore Road. As part of the development approval process, a Site Plan Agreement was executed in February 2025. Several conditions were listed in Schedule C of the Agreement. Condition 26 of the Agreement, Land Conveyances, contemplated parcels of land to be dedicated to the City. Further conveyances were agreed to in the Parkland Dedication Agreement dated September 3, 2025. Schedule C called for a 5-metre wide, 319.6 metre long strip of land parallel to the 32nd Street East Right-of-Way to be dedicated to the City. It was to be classified as Parkland for a 3 metre wide multi-use path, to be constructed by the developer as described in the Master Servicing Agreement dated April 14, 2025. The path was to be built concurrently with the development’s offsite works. Construction of the development is underway, and site servicing, including utilities, are required to enter the site from 32nd Street East. Having a parkland block between the Right-of-Way and the adjacent property has created a complication relating to legal access and thus requires the dedication of Part 5 as a highway to streamline utility and servicing access. Staff Report OP-26-030: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 Page 2 of 4 Page 232 of 304 Analysis and Options: City Engineering and Planning staff have reviewed the options with the City’s solicitor. Two options exist to enable site servicing, access, and utility servicing. Option 1: The recommended option – Dedicate Part 5 as a “public highway” to consolidate it with the Road Allowance. This option is cost-effective and achieves the objective as Council can dedicate Part 5 by by-law, which would allow services and utilities to cross the block as Right-of-Way in conformance with existing franchise agreements. Option 2: Grant servicing easements for each service and utility, as well as an access easement for Bayshore Street Developments Inc. to travel across Part 5, Plan 16R-12255. This option would require a considerable amount of staff time and resources to grant easements to multiple parties. Whether surveyed or blanket (described) easements, either way, the utility company would need to be named as the benefitting party, and the owner of the residential parcel would need an access easement over the City’s land. This approach would have legal and survey costs and may be considered an encumbrance on any future sale of the property. It could also introduce additional risk to the City. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources Dedicating Part 5 of Plan 16R-12255 would incur minimal capital or operating expenses. Human Resources This process is estimated to consume a minor amount of staff time and can therefore be accommodated within the existing work plan. Option 1 is the least onerous of the two options examined. Time and Scheduling This is to be executed immediately upon approval. Staff Report OP-26-030: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 Page 3 of 4 Page 233 of 304 Technology and Infrastructure N/A. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. Communication and Engagement: This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of the meeting. Report Developed in Consultation With: Planning staff, external legal counsel Attachments: Registered Plan 16R-12255 Reviewed by: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Mason Bellamy, Manager of Public Works and Engineering at mbellamy@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 3300. Staff Report OP-26-030: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-12255 Page 4 of 4 Page 234 of 304 SCHEDULE PART LOT JUDGES PLAN 1 PART OF 54 22.780 2 PART OF 53 14.709 3 PART OF 53 & 54 0.568 4 PART OF 54 838 ALL OF PIN AREA(ACRES) 37060-0123 0.014 5 A 7 Received and deposited 0.403 6 B PLAN 16R-12255 August 7 th, 2025 0.026 PART OF 53 0.012 8 Alana Kinsey 0.001 Representative for the Land Registrar for the Land Titles Division of Grey (No.16) PART 5 PART 5 PART 8 PART 3 PART 6 PART 7 PART 2 PART 2 PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF LOTS 53 AND 54 JUDGE'S PLAN No. 838 CITY OF OWEN SOUND COUNTY OF GREY Scale 1:750 20 B A 0 20 40 METRES THE INTENDED PLOT SIZE OF THIS PLAN IS 915 mm IN WIDTH BY 915 mm IN HEIGHT WHEN PLOTTED AT A SCALE OF 1 : 750. Stantec Geomatics Ltd. PART 3 PART 5 PART 7 PART 6 PART 8 METRIC CONVERSION DISTANCES AND COORDINATES SHOWN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048. GRID SCALE CONVERSION DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO GRID BY MULTIPLYING BY THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 0.999578. BEARING REFERENCE BEARINGS ARE UTM GRID, REFERRED TO THE CENTRAL MERIDIAN OF ZONE 17 (81°W LONGITUDE), DERIVED FROM OBSERVED REFERENCE POINTS A AND B. BEARINGS HAVE BEEN ROTATED COUNTERCLOCKWISE ON THE FOLLOWING PLANS TO ACCOUNT FOR CONVERSION TO GRID BEARINGS: - PART 2 PART 6 P2, P3, P4 BY 0° 02' 50" Legal Legend DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES IB SIB SSIB CC CP WIT PIN MEAS OU 823 H&M JEL STANTEC D1 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 FOUND MONUMENTS SET MONUMENTS IRON BAR STANDARD IRON BAR SHORT STANDARD IRON BAR CUT CROSS CONCRETE PIN WITNESS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER MEASURED ORIGIN UNKNOWN IVAN DINSMORE LTD., O.L.S. HEWETT & MILNE LTD., O.L.S. LANTHIER & GILMORE SURVEYING LTD. STANTEC GEOMATICS LTD. INSTRUMENT R91914 PLAN 16R-10288 JUDGES PLAN 838 PLAN 16R-4822 PLAN 16R-8717 PLAN OF SURVEY BY STANTEC GEOMATICS DATED JULY 5TH, 2022, FILE #161630096 PART 1 PART 3 INTEGRATION TABLE OBSERVED REFERENCE POINTS (ORP) DERIVED FROM GNSS OBSERVATIONS USING A REAL-TIME CORRECTION SERVICE AND REFERRED TO UTM ZONE 17, NAD83 (CSRS)(2010). PART 4 COORDINATES TO URBAN ACCURACY PER S.14(2) O.REG. 216/10 ORP NORTHING EASTING A 4938698.91 506344.17 B 4938611.26 506681.01 COORDINATES CANNOT, IN THEMSELVES, BE USED TO RE-ESTABLISH CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT : 1. THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYORS ACT, THE LAND TITLES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM. 2. THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 29th DAY OF JULY, 2025. AUGUST 6, 2025 DATE JASON FINCH ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR THIS PLAN OF SURVEY RELATES TO AOLS PLAN SUBMISSION FORM NUMBER V109703 Stantec Geomatics Ltd. CANADA LANDS SURVEYORS ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS SUITE 300, 125 COMMERCE VALLEY DR. W. MARKHAM, ONTARIO, L3T 7W4 TEL. 416-499-3110 stantec.com DWN: JF CHK: JL DATE: 6-Aug-25 PROJECT: 161630183 Page 235 of 304 Staff Report Report To: City Council Report From: Lauren Stewart, Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Meeting Date: May 25, 2026 Report Code: CR-26-048 Subject: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Recommendations: THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-048 respecting the Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor CleanOut, City Council: 1. Approves the non-standard procurement for the Digestor Clean-out as described in the report at an upset limit of $309,669.93, including the City’s non-refundable allocation of HST; and 2. Authorizes the Director of Corporate Services to issue a Purchase Order to 1000369980 Ontario Inc. o/a Maurice Mechanical and Saugeen Agri Services Ltd. Highlights: Approximately every five years, deleterious materials in the digestor must be cleaned out to allow for proper tank operation, especially the biosolids pumps and mixing system. This project includes an eight-week shutdown period of the wastewater treatment plant digestor. During the shutdown period, material must be continuously hauled and disposed of off site due to the lack of a second digestor. Staff also take this opportunity to assess and repair critical equipment that is only accessible when the digestor is offline. Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 1 of 6
11.h Report CR-26-048 from the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement - Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out
Owen Sound's wastewater plant faces escalating clogging risks in its single-digestor system, threatening service continuity for nearby residents. A critical, eight-week maintenance shutdown is scheduled to begin mid-June 2026, requiring specialized non-competitive contracts with Saugeen Agri Services and Maurice Mechanical under By-law No. 2020-022. The $304,314 project will drain the 2,000-cubic-metre unit, replace valves, repair structural supports, and restore biological operations using nitrogen purging for safety. With land application equipment owned by Saugeen, biosolids removal remains essential to prevent unregulated discharge. The dry-season timing aims to minimize costly haulage impacts from wet-weather inflows, ensuring equitable service without tax-funded rate hikes. Public engagement is posted online, with no anticipated community disruption pending approval.
Page 236 of 304 Vision 2050 - Strategic Plan Alignment: Strategic Plan Priority: The recommendation contributes to core service delivery or a corporate initiative that enables service delivery for one or more strategic priorities. Previous Report/Authority: N/A. Background: Section 33 of By-law No. 2020-022 (Purchasing By-law) permits nonstandard procurement processes under a series of conditions, including the procurement of goods, services, construction, or consulting services where only one supplier is able to meet the requirements of the procurement to ensure compatibility with existing products and where the use of competitive procurement would cause significant inconvenience or substantial duplication of costs for the City. A digestor clean-out at a wastewater treatment plant is a highly specialized, multi-step operation involving temporarily removing the digestor from service, removing accumulated biosolids, and restoring it to safe, efficient operation. The timing, scheduling, and execution of this project is critical and requires significant coordination between internal staff and specialized external contractors. Due to the sensitivity of this process, staff are seeking approval to retain two qualified contractors to perform the work, thereby minimizing operational risk. The City currently uses Saugeen Agri Services for biosolids trucking and land application. The contractor has acquired land and the equipment for spreading bio-solids. Additionally, they oversee the requirements required for NASM (Non-Agricultural Source Material) permits and post-application reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). Maurice Mechanical is a TSSA-licensed contractor responsible for maintaining the City’s digestor biogas equipment and has previously completed digestor clean-out work. Section 34 of the Purchasing By-law requires that non-competitive purchases greater than $100,000 must be approved by Council. Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 2 of 6 Page 237 of 304 Analysis and Options: The digestor has a capacity of approximately 2,000 cubic metres and receives raw sludge from the primary clarifiers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, provides treatment, and produces biogas. The sludge is then transferred to the two on-site storage tanks and stored until it is removed for land application. Approximately every five years, deleterious materials in the digestor must be cleaned out to allow for proper tank operation, especially the biosolids pumps and mixing system. Otherwise, rags, plastics and other materials clog those components, which could result in digestor failure. Such clogging events are accelerating in frequency; this is expected to be relieved through the installation of the intermediate bar screens project currently under construction. As identified in the capital detail sheet, a temporary shutdown period was also considered as an opportunity to refurbish or replace the digestor gas compressor. However, following manufacturer inspection and review of the accessible equipment, no additional work has been deemed necessary at this time. As noted above, the ongoing project related to fine screen replacement, awarded under Report CR-25-115, at the September 8, 2025 Council meeting, will mitigate operational and financial risks through decreased frequency of digestor and storage tank cleanouts, decreased impact on equipment such as pumps, motors, etc., and staff time to deal with breakdowns. The scope of work for the current project includes the following: Maurice Mechanical will undertake a comprehensive clean-out. This work includes safely purging the digestor with nitrogen gas to reduce explosive gas levels prior to access, followed by the removal of the upper access hatches to complete draining of the unit. Mechanical upgrades will be completed, including the removal and replacement of three existing gas valves with new units, and the inspection and cleaning of the vacuum and pressure relief valves. Minor structural repairs will also be executed, such as welding damaged pipe supports on the digestor roof, under controlled safety conditions. Following cleaning and repairs, the digestor will be reassembled with new gaskets and hardware to ensure proper sealing. Prior to returning the unit to service, the digestor will be refilled and purged again with Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 3 of 6 Page 238 of 304 nitrogen to reduce oxygen levels, ensuring safe conditions for reintroduction of biological material and resumption of normal operations. Saugeen Agri Services will support plant operations during the digestor shutdown by providing both sludge haulage and clean-out services. During the approximately 8-week shutdown period, they will remove and transport sludge from the facility to an approved receiving site to maintain continuous plant operations while the digestor is offline. Based on previous experience, Saugeen estimates that the digestor clean-out itself will require approximately 40 hours to complete. This work will include the provision of all required labour, a vacuum system for sludge removal, a screening plant, and an application unit on standby to manage and process materials efficiently. This coordinated approach ensures that sludge is managed safely and effectively throughout both the shutdown and clean-out phases, while maintaining regulatory compliance and minimizing operational disruption. Resource Alignment: Financial Resources The approved capital budget for the construction component of this project is $300,000, funded through wastewater user rates. An additional $50,000 allocation for equipment was included in the capital detail sheet but is not required at this time, as the existing equipment’s condition does not warrant replacement. Total anticipated costs are as follows. Note that as this work will be executed on a per-unit basis, the total costs are estimated and do not include applicable tax: Vendor Services Anticipated Costs (Pre-Tax) Saugeen Agri Services Sludge Haulage during shut down $149,940 Saugeen Agri Services Clean-out Services $117,600 Maurice Mechanical Mechanical Upgrades and Repairs $36,774 Total $304,314 Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 4 of 6 Page 239 of 304 Human Resources The proposed contractors have the necessary training, certifications, and resources to safely and efficiently complete the work. No additional human resources are required beyond dedicating existing staff time throughout the shutdown period to ensure appropriate oversight and coordination. The Purchasing and Claims Coordinator is responsible for preparing, developing, coordinating, awarding, and executing all phases of bid opportunities, including Requests for Tenders, Quotations, Proposals, and Non-Standard Procurement. Additionally, the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator is responsible for issuing Purchase Orders when necessary. Relevant department heads or their designates are responsible for preparing scopes of work, specifications, and managing internal communication related to procurement requirements. Time and Scheduling The timing of this project is critical and requires close coordination between staff and contractors. The clean-out is scheduled to commence in mid-June and is expected to span approximately eight weeks, inclusive of haulage, clean-out activities, and mechanical repairs. Weather conditions may impact scheduling and could extend the duration of the work. The previous digestor clean-out conducted in 2021 commenced on June 18 and returned to service on August 6, for a total duration of 49 days at a total cost of $207,969.89. Technology and Infrastructure The wastewater treatment plant currently operates with a single digestor, which limits operational flexibility and increases risk during required maintenance activities such as clean-outs. When the digestor is taken offline, the City must rely on external sludge haulage services and absorb increased operational costs to maintain compliance and continuity of service. Climate and Environmental Impacts: There are no anticipated climate or environmental impacts. It is important, however, that the work be undertaken during the driest part of the year to minimize haulage and field application costs. Extraneous flow during wet seasons can significantly increase total sewage flow into the plant Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 5 of 6 Page 240 of 304 and, therefore, the number and frequency of loads to be hauled while the sludge cannot be fully treated and stored. Communication and Engagement: This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of the meeting. There is no anticipated impact to the public. Report Developed in Consultation With: Manager of Water and Wastewater Wastewater Superintendent Attachments: None. Reviewed by: Jason Hoffman, Manager of Corporate Services Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Submission approved by: Tim Simmonds, City Manager For more information on this report, please contact Lauren Stewart, Purchasing and Claims Coordinator at lstewart@owensound.ca or 519-3764440 ext. 1242. Staff Report CR-26-048: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement – Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out Page 6 of 6 Page 241 of 304 OWEN SOUND HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED MINUTES OF MEETING JANUARY 21, 2026 ONLINE Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors held Wednesday, January 21, 2026 online. PRESENT: Acting Chair Rod Wyatt, Directors Ellen Anderson, Marianne Williams and Glen Henry, City Representative Carol Merton, Executive Director Shari Huber. ABSENT: Chair Ruth Loveel Stanners and Director Selwyn Hicks COMMENCEMENT: 9:10 am CLOSED MEETING: None CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None REGULAR MEETING:
11.i Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound Housing Company meetings held on January 21, 2026, February 9, 2026, March 16, 2026,...
Board meetings in early 2026 approved operating vouchers totaling over $495,000 and accepted the 2025 financial audit.
Page 242 of 304 TREASURER: Williams Anderson THAT Operating Voucher #293 in the amount of $68,144.42 be approved as presented. Williams Anderson TO receive the Frank Smith Apartment Revenue & Expenditure Report to December 31, 2025 as presented. Williams Henry TO receive the Odawa Heights Revenue & Expenditure Report to December 31, 2025 as presented. FINANCE COMMITTEE: Williams Anderson TO approve the 2026 Frank Smith Apartment Operating Budget as presented. Williams Henry TO approve the 2026 Odawa Heights Operating Budget as presented. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: No Report 2 Page 243 of 304 OTHER BUSINESS: Merton asked that an article be circulated to Members about a City of Waterloo Housing By-Law recently passed. NEXT REGULAR MEETING: Monday, February 9, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 a.m. by Chair. __________________________ Rod Wyatt, Acting Chair __________________________ Marianne Williams, Treasurer 3 Page 244 of 304 OWEN SOUND HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED MINUTES OF MEETING FEBRUARY 9, 2026 THE THOMSON AMENITY ROOM Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors held Monday, February 9, 2026 at The Thomson Amenity Room, Owen Sound. PRESENT: Chari Ruth Lovell Stanners, Vice Chair Rod Wyatt, Director Ellen Anderson, Marianne Williams and Glen Henry, City Representative Scott Greig, Executive Director Shari Huber. ABSENT: Directors Selwyn Hicks and Ellen Anderson COMMENCEMENT: 10:35 am CLOSED MEETING: None CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None REGULAR MEETING: Williams Henry THAT the minutes of the regular meeting held January 21, 2026 be approved as presented. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES: None CHAIR: The Chair welcomed Scott Greig to the Board as City Representative. SECRETARY: No Report TREASURER: Williams Greig THAT Operating Voucher #294 in the amount of $204,263.38 be approved as presented. 1 Page 245 of 304 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: No Report OTHER BUSINESS: No Report NEXT REGULAR MEETING: Monday, March 16, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m. by Chair. __________________________ Ruth Lovell Stanners, Chair __________________________ Rod Wyatt, Vice Chair 2 Page 246 of 304 OWEN SOUND HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED MINUTES OF MEETING MARCH 16, 2026 THE THOMSON AMENITY ROOM Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors held Monday, March 16, 2026 at The Thomson Amenity Room, Owen Sound. PRESENT: Chari Ruth Lovell Stanners, Vice Chair Rod Wyatt, Director Ellen Anderson, Marianne Williams and Glen Henry, City Representative Scott Greig, Executive Director Shari Huber. ABSENT: Directors Selwyn Hicks and Ellen Anderson COMMENCEMENT: 9:00 am CLOSED MEETING: None CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None REGULAR MEETING: Wyatt Williams THAT the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 2026 be approved as presented. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES: None CHAIR: Chair spoke of Boil Water Precautionary Advisory. This along with other policy updates will be addressed during Strategic Planning this year. SECRETARY: Wyatt Henry TO receive the 2025 BakerTilly Audit Engagement letter as circulated. 1 Page 247 of 304 TREASURER: Williams Greig THAT Operating Voucher #295 in the amount of $61,059.69 be approved as presented. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Wyatt Henry TO receive 2025 BakerTilly Fraud Questionnaire as circulated. OTHER BUSINESS: Discussion about the grounds and dog droppings. Staff to investigate dog drop bags and dispensing equipment. NEXT REGULAR MEETING: Monday, April 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 a.m. by Chair. __________________________ Ruth Lovell Stanners, Chair __________________________ Rod Wyatt, Vice Chair 2 Page 248 of 304 OWEN SOUND HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED MINUTES OF MEETING APRIL 20, 2026 THE THOMSON AMENITY ROOM Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors held Monday, April 20, 2026 at The Thomson Amenity Room, Owen Sound. PRESENT: Chari Ruth Lovell Stanners, Vice Chair Rod Wyatt, Director Ellen Anderson, Marianne Williams and Glen Henry, City Representative Scott Greig, Administrative Assistant Heather Jolley ABSENT: Director Selwyn Hicks GUEST: Gwynne Potter, Auditor BakerTilley COMMENCEMENT: 9:00 am CHAIR: Chair welcome Gwynne Potter from BakerTilley. AUDIT: Gwynne Potter presented draft 2025 financials for Owen Sound Housing Company Limited. The Auditor noted appreciation to staff for their preparation of the financials throughout the year and during the audit work. Anderson Williams TO accept the 2025 financial audit as presented by BakerTilley. Gwynne Potter left the meeting at this point. CLOSED MEETING: Wyatt Henry TO move into closed session to discuss one matter regarding advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. 1 Page 249 of 304 Williams Henry TO move out of Closed session. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: REGULAR MEETING: None Williams Greig THAT the minutes of the regular meeting held March 16, 2026 be approved as presented. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES: CHAIR: A preliminary review of Strategic Plan will be scheduled for May 11, 2026 immediately following the regular Board meeting. If deemed necessary after that meeting, Centre for Organizational Effectiveness will be contacted to assist. Chair noted that a timing conflict has occurred with a Board member and current monthly meeting dates. Chair suggested changing meeting dates to 2nd Monday of each month. Anderson suggested a start time of 9:30 a.m. to accommodate all members and staff. Williams Anderson TO change the monthly meeting date to the second Monday in a month with a start time of 9:30 a.m. SECRETARY: No Report 2 Page 250 of 304 FINANCE: Williams Wyatt THAT Operating Voucher #296 in the amount of $230,126.83 be approved as presented. Williams Anderson TO receive Frank Smith Comparative 3 Month Income Statement as circulated. Williams Anderson TO receive Odawa Heights Comparative 3 Month Income Statement as circulated. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: No Report OTHER BUSINESS: None NEXT REGULAR MEETING: Monday, May 11, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:53 a.m. by Chair. __________________________ Ruth Lovell Stanners, Chair __________________________ Rod Wyatt, Vice Chair 3 Page 251 of 304 Minutes River District Board of Management March 11, 2026, 5:30 p.m. City Hall - 808 2nd Avenue East - Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Dave Parsons Vice Chair Richard Thomas Councillor Travis Dodd (via video) Member Tim Dwyer Member Kathy Hannen Member Olivia Legate MEMBERS ABSENT: Member Adrienne Robinson Member Jen Smith STAFF PRESENT: Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services Constable James Giles, Owen Sound Police Service Viveca Gravel, River District Coordinator Jacklyn Iezzi, Senior Planner Staci Landry, Deputy Clerk _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Parsons called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION RD-260311-001 "THAT the River District Board of Management now move into 'Closed Session' to consider one matter regarding personal matters about identifiable individuals respecting an appointment to the River District Board of Management." The Board moved into the Closed Session at 5:31 p.m. 1
11.j Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: River District Board of Management meeting held on March 11, 2026
The Board approved minutes from previous meetings and reviewed draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines aimed at ensuring accessibility and safety in commercial zones, with a streamlined application process planned for future years.
Page 252 of 304 3. REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION Chair Parsons advised that the Board returned to the open session at 5:38 p.m. During the Closed Session, the Board discussed one matter regarding personal matters about identifiable individuals respecting an appointment to the River District Board of Management and direction was provided to staff. 4. 5. CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS 4.a Member Legate Re: Citizens on Patrol 2026 Funds 4.b Member Dwyer Re: River District Vacancy 4.c River District Coordinator Re: Poster Kiosk Update DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 6. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 6.a Minutes of the River District Board of Management meeting held on January 14, 2026 RD-260311-002 "THAT the minutes of the River District Board of Management meeting held on January 14, 2026 be approved as printed." 6.b Minutes of the River District Board of Management Special meeting held on February 4, 2026 RD-260311-003 "THAT the minutes of the River District Board of Management Special meeting held on February 4, 2026 be approved as printed." 7. DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 7.a Presentation from the Senior Planner Re: Draft Sidewalk Patio Guidelines The Senior Planner provided a PowerPoint presentation respecting the draft updated Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, which incorporate guidance from the Ontario Traffic Council, including requirements for roadside barriers for patios located in on-street parking spaces. Ms. Iezzi advised that the draft guidelines are intended 2 Page 253 of 304 to ensure patios within the City’s right-of-way support universal accessibility, public safety, and an attractive streetscape. They apply city-wide but are only permitted where commercial uses are allowed under the Zoning By-law and where sufficient right-of-way space exists. Ms. Iezzi noted that applications must be submitted annually between February 1 and April 1, with approvals issued between April 1 and April 30; applications received after this date may not be processed as quickly. Approved patios may operate from May 1 to October 31, with approval authority delegated to the Director of Community Services and the City Manager. Ms. Iezzi advised that the draft guidelines permit frontage, curbside, and curb lane patios, require an accessible pedestrian route on sidewalks, and require operators to comply with applicable regulations, maintain the patio area, and remove all patio elements at the end of the season. Patios located in parking or curb lanes must install curbside barriers (and, where required, crash cushions) at the operator’s expense and provide at least one garbage receptacle. Ms. Iezzi advised that a streamlined application process will be implemented for sidewalk patio permits in subsequent years where no changes to the previously approved patio layout are proposed. Ms. Iezzi noted that the draft guidelines will be approved as a by-law to provide a mechanism for enforcement should a patio be placed illegally within the municipal right-of-way. Ms. Iezzi outlined the anticipated timeline for consideration of the Sidewalk Patio Guidelines, noting that a staff report will be presented to the Community Services Committee on March 18, followed by consultation with the Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee on April 2. A recommendation report incorporating received feedback will be presented to the Community Services Committee on April 22, followed by consideration by City Council on May 11, and anticipated by-law adoption on May 25. In response to a question from the Board, Ms. Iezzi advised that the estimated cost for barriers represents the total cost for the patio season (May 1 to October 31) based on a patio occupying one on-street parking stall. 8. PUBLIC FORUM There were no questions or comments from the public. 9. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION IS REQUIRED There were no correspondence items presented for consideration. 3 Page 254 of 304 10. REPORTS 10.a Verbal Report from the Owen Sound Police Service Re: Police Update Constable Giles, member of the Community Oriented Response Unit (CORE), reported that the Owen Sound Police Service (OSPS) completed 95 hours of foot patrol in the River District in January and 113 hours in February. Constable Giles noted that two River District businesses were recently victims of break-and-enter incidents. The individual responsible for both offences has been located, charged, and is currently being held pending bail. RD-260311-004 "THAT in consideration of the Verbal Report provided March 11, 2026, from Constable James Giles respecting a Police Update, the River District Board of Management receives the Verbal Report for information purposes." 10.b Report CS-26-017 from the River District Coordinator Re: Non-Eligible Collection Survey Results and Next Steps The River District Coordinator provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from the Board, Ms. Gravel advised that she has had discussions with the Owen Sound & District Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Gravel noted that the River District provides an opportunity to adopt a more coordinated approach through internal communication. In response to a question from the Board regarding recycling for businesses with residential units above, the Director of Community Services advised that an education initiative will be undertaken. Ms. Coulter noted that if recycling is found to contain items originating from a business, further action may be pursued. Businesses will be given the opportunity to collaborate on a collection method, which is expected to support compliance. RD-260311-005 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report CS-26-017 respecting the NonEligible Collection Survey Results and Next Steps, the River District Board of Management directs the River District Coordinator to connect River District businesses who are interested in a cooperative program so those businesses may make plans for non-eligible collections as of April 1, 2026." 4 Page 255 of 304 10.c Verbal Report from the Board Treasurer Re: Board Finances The Board Treasurer advised that the total balance of all accounts is $171,812. Ms. Hannen noted that she has provided information to the City’s Director of Corporate Services regarding the gift certificate account balances, and actions are being taken to address this matter. RD-260311-006 "THAT in consideration of the Verbal Report provided March 11, 2026, from the Board Treasurer respecting Board Finances, the River District Board of Management receives the Verbal Report for information purposes." 11. MATTERS POSTPONED There were no matters postponed. 12. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There were no motions for which notice was previously given. 13. CORRESPONDENCE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION 13.a Memorandum from the Deputy Clerk Re: 2026 River District Budget 13.b Letter from the Chair, River District Board of Management Re: Partnership with the Beth Ezekiel Synagogue - Safer and Vital Communities Grant Application 13.c Letter from the Coordinator, Owen Sound Police Service Citizens on Patrol Re: Donations from the Board 13.d Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences: The Vintage Magpie, a home décor business located at 777 2nd Avenue East Cheo Taminang Jude Ngwa is the new owner of Jude's African Caribbean Groceries/Beauty, a retail fashion and Caribbean grocery store at 154 10th Street East Maple Leaf Cannabis, a retail cannabis store located at 1047 2nd Avenue East RD-260311-007 "THAT in consideration of correspondence provided for information purposes listed on the March 11, 2026 River District Board of Management 5 Page 256 of 304 (RDBM) agenda, the RDBM receives items 13.a to 13.d for information purposes." 14. DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS 14.a Citizens on Patrol 2026 Funds Member Legate inquired whether the $1,154.80 donation returned by the Owen Sound Police Service Citizens on Patrol could be allocated to the approved oneyear pilot program for the Events and Activations Team. The Director of Community Services advised that these funds were previously removed from the approved 2026 budget and are therefore not available for use. 14.b River District Vacancy Member Dwyer noted that he counted 12 vacancies along 2nd Avenue East between 8th and 10th Streets East, an increase over the past year. He inquired what measures the Board and the City could take to proactively attract businesses to the River District, emphasizing the importance of preventing the area from appearing more vacant than occupied. The Director of Community Services advised that the River District Coordinator is updating maps of the River District storefronts, which will be shared with the Board. Ms. Coulter noted that the City works with the Board on activations and events, beautification, and maintenance, including a newly established service level. Programs such as the Community Improvement Plan and associated grants are available to support businesses, along with complimentary River District parking, enhanced snow removal, and other services. Ms. Coulter noted that updates to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law are being considered to allow minor expansions in the River District without additional parking requirements. Additional initiatives include sidewalk patios, marketing and promotion, City-led events within the River District, and monitoring store vacancies. Ms. Coulter further advised that the River District Action Plan will be updated this year, incorporating public engagement and business surveys. A recent Council report highlighted various actions, including progress on the Farmers’ Market washroom and grants for street-level enhancements. Ms. Coulter noted that a trial project with Grey County and the Supportive Outreach Services (SOS) program has had a positive impact in the River District. Ms. Gravel added that efforts are underway to engage the public and support new business development, including connecting prospective business owners with the Business Enterprise Centre and the City's Planning Division for the Community Improvement Plan. Ms. Gravel emphasized the ongoing commitment to maintaining the River District as a safe and welcoming environment. 6 Page 257 of 304 14.c Poster Kiosk Update The River District Coordinator advised that a local supplier has been engaged to construct the poster kiosk, using a design similar to the original. Installation is expected to be completed before the end of the summer season. 15. NOTICES OF MOTION There were no notices of motion. 16. ADJOURNMENT The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Chair Parsons adjourned the meeting at 6:24 p.m. 7 Page 258 of 304 Correspondence Items Presented for Information May 25, 2026 1) Correspondence from AMO Re: AMO Policy Update – Advocacy on Bill 98 and Potential Amendments to the Police Record Checks Reform Act. 2) Correspondence from the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Re: Minister’s Direction under Section 1.14 of the Conservation Authorities Act (re: temporary restrictions). 3) Correspondence from the Deputy CAO/Director of Corporate Services, Township of Springwater Re: Provincial Bill 100 – Better Regional Governance Act, 2026. 4) Correspondence from the Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Clearview Township Re: Public Sector Salary Disclosure Inflation Adjustments. 5) Correspondence from the Deputy Clerk, Town of Bruce Mines Re: Bill 97, Plan to Protect Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2026 – Schedule 7. 6) Correspondence from the City of Richmond Hill Re: Integrated Living and Participation Model for Adults with Developmental Disabilities. 7) Correspondence from the Clerk, County of Prince Edward Re: a) Vacant Commercial Storefront Tax. b) Improved Accessibility to Home Insurance for Owners of Properties Designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. Page 259 of 304 Item 1 AMO Policy Update – Advocacy on Bill 98 and Potential Amendments to the Police Record Checks Reform Act Top Insights • AMO supports measures in Bill 98 that enable more consistent and timely development approvals, and enshrine in legislation that municipal water and wastewater corporations must remain publicly owned. • AMO welcomes provincial changes to help reduce wait times for police record checks, including vulnerable sector checks, in direct response to AMO's advocacy. Bill 98: AMO Delivers Remarks to Standing Committee Last week, AMO’s Director of Policy and Government Relations delivered remarks to a legislative standing committee on Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026, which if passed would: • Streamline land-use planning by standardizing official plans, restricting the use of enhanced development standards, and set minimum lot sizes to support more urban density. • Introduce a regulatory framework for communal water and wastewater systems and enshrine in legislation the public ownership of municipal water and wastewater corporations. Page 260 of 304 • Extend the One Fare program into Hamilton and Halton Region, and develop a framework for the Northlander Rideshare Pilot. The province consulted on many of these measures before introducing the Bill, and many reflect AMO’s feedback, including ensuring water and wastewater corporations remain publicly owned. We are also pleased to see the province work with willing municipalities to test and refine standardized Official Plans before mandatory roll-out across the sector. At Standing Committee, AMO made recommendations to the province about Bill 98 including: 1. Listening to technical feedback from municipal planners about how to implement and balance streamlined planning with flexible tools for municipalities to effectively manage growth and meet local needs. This will ensure changes to rules like minimum lot size and development standards do not undermine important considerations like stormwater mitigation and emergency responder access to homes. 2. Ensuring the communal servicing framework provides clarity and consistency without creating unfair advantages for private systems or long-term liabilities to municipalities. This will help make sure that private systems do not undermine long-term infrastructure planning and financing. service integration. Province Speeding Up Police Record Checks The provincial government announced it will introduce legislation to amend the Police Record Checks Reform Act, 2015, to help reduce the wait times for vulnerable sector checks. In December, AMO submitted comments to the province encouraging the government to consider standards that would improve timeframes and Page 261 of 304 processing times for record checks, especially vulnerable sector checks. AMO will review the legislation in more detail, but welcomes the province’s proposed changes and is encouraged that the government is acting in response to AMO's advocacy to help address some of the operational challenges that municipalities have been experiencing. An online version of this Policy Update is also available on the AMO Website. Page 262 of 304 Item 2 Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre 777 Bay Street, 5th Floor Toronto ON M7A 2J3 Tel.: 416 314-6790 777, rue Bay, 5e étage Toronto ON M7A 2J3 Tél. : 416 314-6790 357-2026-1281 May 1, 2026 TO: Conservation Authorities Chairs, GMs/CAOs, and municipalities SUBJECT: Minister’s direction under section 1.14 of the Conservation Authorities Act (re: temporary restrictions) I am writing with regards to the transition of Ontario’s conservation authority system to a consolidated regional model. The Plan to Protect Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2026 received Royal Assent on April 24, 2026 and pursuant to my authority under section 1.14 of the Conservation Authorities Act (CAA), I am issuing a direction to conservation authorities – please see attached to this letter as Attachment A (the “Direction”). The intention of this Direction, which is effective from May 1, 2026 to the transition date under the CAA (i.e., February 1, 2027 or such later date as may be prescribed by the regulations), is to apply temporary restrictions on significant financial, asset or employment decisions to mitigate risk and ensure a stable transition to the new regional structure. This Direction applies to certain conservation authority decisions related to: governance, organizational or staffing changes; the acquisition and disposition of lands; significant capital transactions; and the provision or acquisition of goods or services. For the decisions specified in this Direction, conservation authorities will be required to seek authorization from the chief executive officer of the Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency (or the Chief Conservation Executive of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks if the chief executive officer has not yet been appointed), before the authority can make the decision. This Direction applies to all current conservation authorities, as listed in Appendix A to the attachment. Further guidance on the process to obtain authorization is set out in Appendix B to the attachment. The CAA provides that if an authority makes a decision in contravention of a direction issued under clause 1.14 (1) (a), the authority’s decision has no effect and any agreement that the authority enters into that is in contravention of the direction is void. …2 Page 263 of 304 Page 2. These measures are not intended to interfere with the regular day-to-day business and operations of conservation authorities. If you are contemplating whether or not this Direction applies to a conservation authority decision under consideration, if you have any questions regarding this Direction, or if you are looking to request authorization for a conservation authority decision that may be covered under this Direction, please contact the Chief Conservation Executive at CCEO@ontario.ca and copy the Conservation Authorities Section at the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks at ca.office@ontario.ca. Continuity for communities is a core principle of this transition. These time-limited measures are intended to ensure there aren’t any service disruptions during transition and to ensure that the transition to consolidation is smooth and successful with minimal disruptions to conservation authorities’ governance, programs and services. Thank you for your continued leadership and collaboration as we work to improve the conservation authority system in Ontario. Sincerely, Todd McCarthy Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Enclosures c: The Honorable Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Page 264 of 304 Attachment A Minister’s Direction Issued Pursuant to Section 1.14 of the Conservation Authorities Act (this “Direction”) Section 1.14 of the Conservation Authorities Act provides the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks with the authority to issue a direction to a conservation authority in relation to various matters for the purpose of facilitating the transition to a regional watershed-based framework for conservation authorities. The types of directions that can be issued by the Minister are set out in clauses 1.14 (1) (a) to (d): (a) prohibiting the authority from making a decision in relation to its exercise of any of its powers under this Act or any other Act in the circumstances specified in the direction and subject to any specified conditions; (b) requiring the authority to give notice, in accordance with the direction, of a decision that it has made; (c) requiring the authority to send notices under subsection 25 (2), 27 (3) or 27.2 (3) by the date specified in the direction; (d) governing budgetary and apportionment matters relating to the authority that are otherwise addressed in a regulation made under clause 40 (1) (c), (e) or (f) or clause 40 (3) (k). Section 1.14 further provides that an authority that receives such a direction shall comply with the direction within the time specified in the direction. If an authority makes decision in contravention of a direction issued under clause 1.14 (1) (a), the authority’s decision has no effect and any agreement that the authority enters into that is in contravention of the direction is void. Pursuant to the authority of the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks under clauses 1.14 (1) (a) and (b), the conservation authorities set out under Appendix “A” to this Direction (the “authorities” or each, an “authority”) are hereby directed as follows: Decisions prohibited unless authorization obtained (direction issued under clause 1.14 (1) (a)) 1. Commencing on the Effective Date and until the transition date, an authority is prohibited from making a decision to do any of the following unless the authority obtains written authorization from the chief executive officer of the Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency (“OPCA CEO”) in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraph 4: Page 265 of 304 i. Amending an authority’s by-laws made under section 19.1 of the CAA, unless the amendment is administrative in nature and does not affect the substance or legal effect of the by-law (e.g. updating references, dates, and terminology; name or title changes; and making obvious corrections where the intended meaning is clear). ii. Any of the following related to employment: a. Terminating the employment of a permanent or temporary employee who serves in a senior leadership position, including the authority’s chief administrative officer or general manager, its secretary treasurer, and any departmental directors if applicable. b. Filling a vacancy for (i.e. temporarily or permanently) or making any changes to the terms and conditions of employment for any senior leadership position as referred to in sub-subparagraph a. c. Terminating the employment of any employee who serves in a leadership position related to or who are essential to the provision of the following mandatory programs and services described in the following provisions of O. Reg. 686/21 made under the CAA: flood forecasting and warning (section 2), ice management (section 4), infrastructure (section 5), plan reviews (sections 6 and 7) and the administration and enforcement of Parts VI and VII of the CAA (section 8). d. Increasing the total number of employees of the authority unless the increase was already included in the authority’s approved final budget for the 2026 calendar year. iii. Changing the organizational structure of the employees of the authority, including creating, merging, or eliminating departments. iv. Acquiring, by purchase, lease or otherwise, any land or to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of any land owned by the authority. v. Acquiring services from a person or body where: a. the duration of the provision of the service exceeds 2 years in length, or b. the total cost of the service exceeds the lesser of $500,000 and 5% of the authority’s operating expenses, as reported in the authority’s most recent audited financial statement. This does not include a decision to renew or extend an agreement for a service that a person or body was providing to the authority prior to the Effective Date. Page 266 of 304 vi. Providing a service to a person or body where: a. the duration of the provision of the service exceeds 2 years in length, or b. the total amount to be charged for the service exceeds the lesser of $500,000 and 5% of the authority’s revenues, as reported in the authority’s most recent audited financial statement. This does not include a decision to, renew or extend an agreement for a service that the authority was providing to the person or body prior to the Effective Date. vii. Incurring a capital cost in connection with a project or purchasing, leasing or otherwise acquiring personal property, including materials, equipment and vehicles, where: a. in the case of a lease, the duration of the term of the lease exceeds 2 years in length, or b. the total amount of the capital cost or purchase, lease or other acquisition would exceed the lesser of $500,000 and 5% of the authority’s tangible capital assets, as reported in the authority’s most recent audited financial statement. This direction does not apply if the capital cost or acquisition is contemplated for a particular program or service identified in the authority’s approved final budget for the 2026 calendar year and the total capital cost or acquisition amount is within the budgeted amount for the program or service. viii. Selling, leasing, or otherwise disposing of or dealing with personal property, including materials, equipment and vehicles, where: a. in the case of the lease, the duration of the term of the lease exceeds 2 years in length, or b. the total amount of the lease or other disposition or dealing would exceed the lesser of $500,000 and 5% of the authority’s tangible capital assets, as reported in the authority’s most recent audited financial statement. 2. Despite paragraph 1, sub-paragraphs 1. v to viii do not apply to a decision of an authority that is made for the purpose of alleviating an immediate danger to human life, the health of any persons, or to property. Page 267 of 304 3. For greater certainty, paragraph 1 does not apply to a decision of an authority to execute an agreement that has the effect of implementing a decision made by the authority before the Effective Date. 4. The following conditions must be satisfied before an authority is authorized to make a decision that is subject to paragraph 1: i. ii. The authority must request authorization from the OPCA CEO to make the decision, in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Direction. The authority must receive written authorization from the OPCA CEO to make the decision. If authorization for the request is granted only in part, the authority must ensure that its decision does not exceed the scope of the authorization. 5. For the purposes of paragraph 4, the authority must request authorization to make a decision that is subject to paragraph 1 by submitting the following information to the OPCA CEO: i. ii. iii. iv. A description of the decision that the authority is seeking authorization to make, including details of the proposed decision and why the proposed decision is a decision that is subject to paragraph 1. An explanation for why authorization should be granted, including any risks associated with deferring the proposed decision until after the transition date. Any information about relevant dates for the proposed decision, including any considerations around urgency or the time-sensitive nature of the proposed decision. 6. The authority must provide any additional information about the request to the OPCA CEO at the OPCA CEO’s request. Notice of a decision that an authority has made to address an emergency (direction issued under clause 1.14 (1) (b)) 7. Commencing on the Effective Date and until the transition date, where the authority makes a decision that is not subject to paragraph 1 by reason that the decision is made for the purpose of alleviating an immediate danger to human life, health, or property, the authority must give notice to OPCA CEO within 3 business days after making the decision. 8. The notice mentioned in paragraph 7 must describe the decision that was made and explain how the decision that was made for the purpose of alleviating an immediate danger to human life, the health of any persons, or to property. Page 268 of 304 General 9. In this Direction, a reference to the OPCA CEO means the Chief Conservation Executive of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, if a chief executive officer of OPCA has not yet been appointed. 10. In this Direction, a reference to an authority’s approved final budget for the 2026 calendar year means the authority’s final budget for the 2026 calendar year that was approved prior to the Effective Date. For greater certainty, if an authority has not yet approved its final budget for the 2026 calendar year prior to the Effective Date, the authority does not have an approved final budget for the 2026 calendar year for the purposes of this Direction. 11. The authority must ensure that any employee of the authority who is responsible for or involved in making a decision that is subject to this Direction is made aware of this Direction, and the authority must require these employees to take all steps necessary to ensure the authority complies with this Direction. 12. This Direction applies to the conservation authorities listed in Appendix “A” to this Direction. 13. For greater certainty, this Direction also applies to the conservation authorities listed in Appendix “A” to this Direction when such conservation authorities are meeting as a source protection authority under the Clean Water Act, 2006. 14. This Direction is effective from May 1, 2026 (the “Effective Date”) to the transition date, within the meaning of the Conservation Authorities Act (i.e., February 1, 2027 or such later date as may be prescribed by the regulations). 15. This Direction may be amended in writing from time to time at the sole discretion of the Minister. Todd McCarthy Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks May 1, 2026 Page 269 of 304 Appendix A LIST OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES TO WHICH THE DIRECTION APPLIES Ausable Bayfield CA Lower Trent Region CA Cataraqui Region CA Maitland Valley CA Catfish Creek CA Mattagami Region CA Central Lake Ontario CA Mississippi Valley CA Credit Valley CA Niagara Peninsula CA Crowe Valley CA Nickel District CA Essex Region CA North Bay-Mattawa CA Ganaraska Region CA Nottawasaga Valley CA Grand River CA Otonabee Region CA Grey Sauble CA Quinte Region CA Halton Region CA Raisin Region CA Hamilton Region CA Rideau Valley CA Kawartha Region CA Saugeen Valley CA Kettle Creek CA Sault Ste. Marie Region CA Lake Simcoe Region CA South Nation River CA Lakehead Region CA St. Clair Region CA Long Point Region CA Toronto and Region CA Lower Thames Valley CA Upper Thames River CA Page 270 of 304 Appendix B GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR THE MINISTER’S DIRECTION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 1.14 OF THE CAA The following sets out additional information and guidance for authorities in relation to the Minister’s Direction issued May 1, 2026 under s. 1.14 of the CAA. The ministry strongly encourages conservation authorities to contact the Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency (OPCA) at CCEO@ontario.ca if an authority is uncertain about the scope, application or requirements of this direction. OPCA can help clarify whether a proposed decision is subject to this Direction and how the authority can ensure it complies with this Direction. As paragraph 11 of the Direction provides, if any decisions covered by the Direction are made by employees of the authority, the authority has the obligation to ensure that their employees are aware of this Direction and that the authority seeks prior authorization in accordance with the Direction before the decision is made. The CAA provides that, if an authority makes a decision in contravention of a direction issued under clause 1.14 (1) (a), the authority’s decision has no effect and any agreement that the authority enters into that is in contravention of the direction is void. Request and OPCA CEO Decision Process Making a Request After a conservation authority determines that a proposed decision requires authorization from the OPCA CEO, the authority may make a request for authorization via email to CCEO@ontario.ca containing the following required information: • A description of the decision that the authority is seeking authorization to make, including details of the proposed decision and why the proposed decision is a decision that is subject to paragraph 1 of the Direction. • An explanation for why authorization should be granted, including any risks associated with deferring the proposed decision until after the transition date. • Any information about relevant dates for the proposed decision, including any considerations around urgency or the time-sensitive nature of the proposed decision. Any notices of decisions required to be given to OPCA CEO under paragraph 7 of the Direction should also be sent via email to CCEO@ontario.ca. Confirmation of Receipt Once the OPCA (or Office of the Chief Conservation Executive (OCCE) if the OPCA CEO has not yet been appointed), receives a request from the authority that includes the required information, the authority will be notified by OPCA that the request has been received and the timeline for a decision. The OPCA will also inform the Ministry’s Conservation Authorities Section (CAS) (via ca.office@ontario.ca) that a request for written authorization has been received. In addition, if the authority provides notice under paragraph 7 of the Direction of a decision made for the purpose of alleviating an immediate danger to human life, health, or property, the OPCA will inform the CAS. Page 271 of 304 If, upon review by the OPCA CEO, it is determined that a decision is not subject to the requirement for prior written authorization, the authority will be notified as soon as possible that the decision is not subject to this Direction. Consideration of Request The OPCA CEO will endeavour to make a decision on the request in a timely manner and not more than 30 calendar days from the day of receiving the request that is accompanied with the required information. Where the complexity of the request or the need for additional information necessitates, written notice will be provided to the authority by the OPCA of any additional time needed to issue a decision. The OPCA CEO may consult on an authority’s request with the relevant transition committee and project executive that has been appointed by OPCA for that authority. . The OPCA CEO may also require the authority to provide additional information if needed to support their consideration of the request. Decision The OPCA CEO may make the following types of decisions on a request for written authorization: • • Grant authorization to the authority to proceed with making the decision that was the subject of the request, in whole or in part (i.e., authorize the authority to proceed in a more limited manner than what was requested). Deny authorization, including in circumstances where, in the opinion of the OPCA CEO, the decision would not be in the best interest of the future regional conservation authority, or it would be more appropriate to defer the decision to the future regional conservation authority. The decision of the OPCA CEO on the request will be given in writing to the authority and will include a rationale for the decision if the decision is to deny authorization or only grant authorization in part. The Ministry’s CAS will also be notified of the OPCA CEO’s decision. Where an authority's proposed decision is authorized by the OPCA CEO, or where the proposed decision has been authorized but only in part, this in no way compels the authority to proceed with the decision. In all cases, the authority retains the sole power to determine whether to proceed with any decision that has been authorized by the OPCA CEO. Reconsideration There is no process for reconsideration of an OPCA CEO decision on a request for authorization under the Direction. An authority whose request for authorization is denied or granted only in part may request authorization again in accordance with the Direction at a later date if the circumstances have changed and the authority believes that these changes in circumstances would support the granting of authorization. Page 272 of 304 Item 3 www.springwater.ca 2231 Nursery Road Minesing, Ontario L9X 1A8 Canada May 7, 2026 Sent via email: minister.mah@ontario.ca Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing College Park, 17th Floor 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 RE: Provincial Bill 100 – Better Regional Governance Act, 2026 Please be advised that at its Regular meeting on May 6, 2026, Council of the Township Whereas Bill 100, the Better Regional Governance Act, 2026, introduced in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, proposes significant changes to the governance structure of upper-tier regional municipalities, including the County of Simcoe; and, Whereas the proposed legislation would authorize the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to appoint the Warden of the County of Simcoe, rather than maintaining the longstanding practice of selection by County Council; and, Whereas the County of Simcoe is comprised of 16 member municipalities, each represented at County Council, forming a governance model rooted in local representation and accountability to residents; and, Whereas residents expect that those exercising authority over local decisionmaking are accountable to the communities they serve, and not appointed by or primarily aligned with the provincial government; and, Whereas Bill 100 proposes a reduction in County Council composition and introduces the potential for provincially regulated weighted voting, creating uncertainty regarding equitable representation among member municipalities; and, Phone: 705-728-4784 Ext. 2304 Clerk’s Department Fax: 705-728-6957 Page 273 of 304 www.springwater.ca 2231 Nursery Road Minesing, Ontario L9X 1A8 Canada Whereas the Province has indicated its intention to extend “Strong Chair” powers to the Warden of the County of Simcoe, thereby concentrating decision-making authority in a single office; and, Whereas such concentration of authority may alter the balance of municipal governance and reduce the role of council-based decision-making; and, Whereas the introduction of Strong Chair powers at the upper-tier level may give rise to governance challenges where alignment between the Head of Council, Council, and the communities they serve is not maintained; and, Whereas municipal professional associations have cautioned that such a governance model may place senior municipal staff in a difficult position that may undermine their neutrality and professionalism, and there continues uncertainty and concern among residents regarding the concentration of authority in a single office and the reduced role of councils; and, Whereas the Township of Springwater has previously expressed opposition to the expansion of “Strong Mayor” powers and has consistently supported transparent, accountable, and locally driven governance structures that respect the role of elected councils and reflect the interests of residents. Now Therefore Be It Resolved That: The Council of the Township of Springwater opposes Bill 100, the Better Regional Governance Act, 2026, in its current form; and, That Council opposes the appointment of the Warden of the County of Simcoe by the Province, and affirms that the Warden should continue to be selected through a process that ensures accountability to the residents of Simcoe County; and, That Council opposes the extension of “Strong Chair” powers to the Warden of the County of Simcoe, given the significant shift in governance authority and its potential impacts on local democracy, council function, and municipal administration; and, That Council expresses concern regarding the potential introduction of provincially regulated weighted voting rules, and the absence of a clearly defined framework ensuring fair and equitable representation for all member municipalities; and, Phone: 705-728-4784 Ext. 2304 Clerk’s Department Fax: 705-728-6957 Page 274 of 304 www.springwater.ca 2231 Nursery Road Minesing, Ontario L9X 1A8 Canada That the Government of Ontario be requested to amend Bill 100 to preserve local democratic authority, maintain council-based governance structures, and ensure that upper-tier municipal leadership remains accountable to local councils and communities; and, That the Government of Ontario be further requested to undertake meaningful consultation with affected municipalities, including the County of Simcoe and its 16 member municipalities, prior to advancing any legislative or regulatory changes impacting municipal governance; and, Members of Provincial Parliament, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the County of Simcoe, and all Ontario municipalities, for their consideration; and, concerns and to clearly communicate the Township of Springwater’s position to its residents. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Yours Truly, Renée Ainsworth Deputy Chief Administrative Officer/Director of Corporate Services renee.ainsworth@springwater.ca cc. Simcoe County Council, clerks@simcoe.ca Association of Ontario Municipalities resolutions@amo.on.ca Members of Provincial Parliament All Ontario Municipalities Phone: 705-728-4784 Ext. 2304 Clerk’s Department Fax: 705-728-6957 Page 275 of 304 Item 4 Clerk’s Department Township of Clearview Box 200, 217 Gideon Street Stayner, Ontario L0M 1S0 clerks@clearview.ca | www.clearview.ca Phone: 705-428-6230 May 12, 2026 Premier Doug Ford Legislative Building, Queen's Park Toronto ON M7A 1A1 Sent by Email: RE: doug.fordco@pc.ola.org Adjustments Please be advised that at its meeting held on May 11, 2026, Council of the Township of Adjustments: Sector Salary Disclosure Act passed in 1996, requires that every public employer make available for inspection by the public without charge, a written record of the amount of salary and benefits paid in the previous year by the employer to or in respect of an employee to whom the employer paid at least $100,000 as a salary; and, Whereas this $100,000 salary threshold has not been updated since 1996, to reflect inflation; and, Whereas with consumer price index (CPI) adjustments, $100,000 is equivalent to just over $180,000 today; Now Therefore Be It Resolved that Council of the Township of Clearview request that the Public Sector Salary Disclosure Act be amended to reflect the impact of inflation on the $100,000 salary threshold for reporting, by either adding wording to reflect annual adjustments related to the consumer price index (CPI) or providing an adjusted salary of $200,000; and, and Housing; Simcoe-Grey MPP Brian Saunderson; the Association of Municipalities and Page 1 of 2 Page 276 of 304 Clerk’s Department May 12, 2026 the undersigned. Sincerely, Sasha Helmkay-Playter, B.A., Dipl. M.A., AOMC Clerk/Director of Legislative Services cc: Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Rob Flack Simcoe-Grey MPP, Brian Saunderson The Association of Municipalities All Ontario Municipalities Page 2 of 2 Page 277 of 304 Item 5 Page 278 of 304 Page 279 of 304 Item 6 Extracts from Council Meeting C#08-26 held May 13, 2026 Confirmatory By-law 54-26 16. Other Business 16.1 Member Motion - Councillor Thompson - Integrated Living and Participation Model for Adults with Developmental Disabilities Councillor Thompson Councillor Cui Whereas individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities often experience a significant reduction in structured supports and programming upon reaching adulthood, particularly after the age of 21; and Whereas many of these individuals remain reliant on aging parents or caregivers, creating growing concern among families regarding long-term housing, care, and quality of life; and Whereas the Province of Ontario has, over time, transitioned away from large institutional models of care toward more community-based and inclusive approaches for individuals with developmental disabilities; and Whereas while these changes have improved opportunities for inclusion and independence, the current system of supports is often delivered across multiple programs and providers and may not fully address the long-term need for integrated living environments that combine housing, supports, and meaningful daily participation; and Whereas there is an increasing need for innovative, sustainable, and inclusive models of care that support independence, dignity, and community integration for adults with developmental disabilities; and Whereas opportunities may exist to explore models that provide safe and supportive living environments for adults with developmental disabilities while also offering structured, voluntary, and supported participation in day-to-day activities that foster a sense of purpose, skill development, and social connection; and Whereas such models, if thoughtfully designed, could complement existing care environments and contribute positively to the overall wellbeing of both participants and residents; and …2/ For Your Information and Any Action Deemed Necessary 225 East Beaver Creek Road, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3P4 905-771-8800 RichmondHill.ca Page 280 of 304 Extracts from Council Meeting C#08-26 held May 13, 2026 Confirmatory By-law 54-26 Whereas the Regional Municipality of York is responsible for a range of human services including housing, community services, and the operation of long-term care homes, and is therefore well-positioned to explore integrated and interdisciplinary approaches to care. Therefore, be it resolved that the Council of the City of Richmond Hill request that the Regional Municipality of York consider exploring innovative models of housing and support for adults with developmental disabilities, including the potential for an “Integrated Living and Participation Model”; and That such consideration includes opportunities for co-location or partnership with existing regional services, including long-term care and community housing, where appropriate; and That this model emphasizes voluntary, supported, and meaningful participation in activities that enhance quality of life, social inclusion, and community engagement, without displacing existing workforce roles; and That Council request that the Region engage with relevant stakeholders, including developmental service organizations, families, and advocacy groups, in considering such approaches; and • York Region Council • Daisy Wai, MPP – Richmond Hill; Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister for Seniors and Accessibility • Michael Parsa, MPP – Aurora-Oak Ridges-Richmond Hill; Minister of Children, Community and Social Services • Natalia Kuzendova-Bashta, Minister of Long-Term Care • Association of Municipalities of Ontario • Ontario municipalities for information For Your Information and Any Action Deemed Necessary 225 East Beaver Creek Road, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3P4 905-771-8800 RichmondHill.ca Page 281 of 304 Item 7a From the Office of the Clerk The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward T: 613.476.2148 x 1021 | F: 613.476.5727 clerks@pecounty.on.ca | www.thecounty.ca May 18, 2026 Please be advised that during the regular Council meeting of May 12, 2026 the following 2026-207 DATE: May 12, 2026 Councillor Braney Councillor Engelsdorfer WHEREAS the vitality of Prince Edward County's main streets is essential to the economic, social, and cultural health of our community; WHEREAS there are numerous long-term vacant commercial storefronts, which detracts from the character of the community, reduces pedestrian traffic, discourages business investment, and negatively impacts the viability of surrounding small businesses; WHEREAS the current Municipal Act, 2001 does not provide municipalities with the explicit legal authority to implement a "Vacant Commercial Storefront Tax," although other jurisdictions are actively advocating for such tools to address similar challenges; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Council of the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward: 1. THAT staff be directed to report back to Council on the feasibility of implementing a Vacant Commercial Storefront Tax, including an analysis of the necessary provincial legislative changes required, recommendations for stakeholder consultation, and to concurrently explore potential enforceable mechanisms available under current legislation; 2. THAT the Council of the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward hereby requests that the Government of Ontario amend the Municipal Act, 2001 to grant Ontario municipalities the permissive authority to implement a "Vacant Commercial Storefront Tax" or similar levy to encourage the productive use of long-term vacant retail properties; 3. the Premier of Ontario, and the Member of Provincial Parliament representing the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward for their immediate consideration; and Page 282 of 304 From the Office of the Clerk The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward T: 613.476.2148 x 1021 | F: 613.476.5727 clerks@pecounty.on.ca | www.thecounty.ca 4. of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) for their endorsement and advocacy. Yours truly, Catalina Blumenberg, CLERK cc: Mayor Steve Ferguson, Councillor Braney, Councillor Engelsdorfer Page 283 of 304 Item 7b From the Office of the Clerk The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward T: 613.476.2148 x 1021 | F: 613.476.5727 clerks@pecounty.on.ca | www.thecounty.ca May 18, 2026 Please be advised that during the regular Council meeting of May 12, 2026 the following 2026-209 DATE: May 12, 2026 Councillor Pennell Councillor Hirsch WHEREAS the historic built and cultural heritage of Prince Edward County is recognized as a fundamental part of its community character and identity, and is a driver of the local tourism economy; WHEREAS the Ontario Heritage Act encourages municipalities in Ontario to designate and protect properties that meet provincial criteria related to design, historical and contextual value; WHEREAS the municipality has designated, and continues to encourage owners of heritage properties to protect those attributes which exemplify design, historical, and contextual value and interest by consenting to designation of those properties as being of cultural heritage value and interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; WHEREAS the municipality has designated properties of heritage value and interest in the Picton Heritage Conservation District and Wellington Heritage Conservation District under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act; WHEREAS homeowners require insurance to protect their homes, which is often their most significant investment, and can be required to maintain a mortgage; and WHEREAS the Province of Ontario has stated that a heritage designation does not place additional requirements on insurers and that insurance premiums should not go up because of a heritage designation; WHEREAS some owners of designated properties have reported that their premiums have gone up as a result of a heritage designation or they have been denied an insurance policy as a result of a heritage designation; WHEREAS as a result of insurance concerns, some homeowners have objected to proposed heritage designation on their property; and Page 284 of 304 From the Office of the Clerk The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward T: 613.476.2148 x 1021 | F: 613.476.5727 clerks@pecounty.on.ca | www.thecounty.ca WHEREAS this directly threatens the unique and irreplaceable heritage character of Prince Edward County; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the County of Prince Edward calls on the Provincial Government to: 1. Investigate why some insurers are raising premiums on heritage designated properties or are denying insurance policies as a result of a heritage designation in contravention of provincial guidance; 2. Bring insurance regulators, insurance industry representatives and heritage professionals together to find solutions that enable the continued protection of heritage properties without unwarranted financial burden on homeowners; 3. Regulate the impact of heritage designation on insurance premiums through enforcement, education and new solutions; and THAT the Built & Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee be directed to continue exploring ways to educate homeowners regarding insurance for heritage designated properties; and Citizenship and Multiculturalism; Bay of Quinte M.P.P. Tyler Allsopp; the Association of Municipalities of Ontario; the Financial Services Regulatory Authority; the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators, and the Insurance Bureau of Canada. Yours truly, Catalina Blumenberg, CLERK cc: Mayor Steve Ferguson, Councillor Pennell, Councillor Hirsch Page 285 of 304 Minutes Corporate Services Committee May 7, 2026, 5:30 p.m. City Hall - 808 2nd Avenue East - Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT/REGRETS: Chair Suneet Kukreja Vice Chair Melanie Middlebro' Member Monica Dale Councillor Travis Dodd (via video) Member Daniel Fletcher Councillor Carol Merton Member Greg Milburn Member Franklin Morais Member Neil McCutcheon STAFF PRESENT: Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services David Crane, Manager of Revenue/Deputy Treasurer Christina McLean, Committee and Executive Support Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kukreja called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS There was no additional business. 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.a Minutes of the Corporate Services Committee meeting held on April 9, 2026 1 Page 286 of 304 CR-260507-001 "THAT the Corporate Services Committee approves the minutes of the meeting held on April 9, 2026." 5. DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS There were no deputations or presentations. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There were no questions or comments from the public. 7. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION IS REQUIRED There were no correspondence items presented for consideration. 8. REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 8.a Accounting 8.a.1 Report CR-26-043 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 T1 Financial Update The Director of Corporate Services provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan clarified that additional information on the staffing vacancies that create the gapping savings is provided annually in the annual Human Resources metrics report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that the winter control budget was increased significantly this year and added that this budget is typically based on an average of the previous 4 to 5 years. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that the budgeted financial forecast anticipates for a similar level of winter control operations in November and December to the previous year. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that there has not been a significant impact from elevated gas prices reflected in this year's actuals at this time. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that the Tax Stabilization Reserve can be utilized to fund operations if there is a significant winter that is unanticipated. 2 Page 287 of 304 CR-260507-002 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-043 respecting the 2026 T1 Financial Update, the Corporate Services Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.b Taxes and Revenue 8.b.1 Report CR-26-044 from the Deputy Treasurer Re: Tax Billing and Collection Policy The Deputy Treasurer provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Corporate Services clarified that the main goal with properties in tax arrears is to slowly minimize the amount owing over time through payment plans and other efforts without having to proceed to the tax sale registration process. She added that this policy formalizes the process for payment plans and how they are enacted to ensure that every account is treated equally. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that generally if there are multiple properties in arrears owned by one entity, and one property is sold, then the City would receive the outstanding funds from the proceeds of that sale. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that there have been a number of properties that have either entered into payment plans or paid off tax arrears so far this year. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. Crane noted that while new accounts cannot sign up for the 10-tax pre-authorized payment plan, it is included in this policy as there are a small number of accounts still under these plans. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. Crane noted that there is information respecting Virtual City Hall and pre-authorized payment plans on the property tax bill inserts and that the City occasionally issues social media posts to promote these features as well. 3 Page 288 of 304 CR-260507-003 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-044 respecting the Revised Tax Billing and Collection Policy, the Corporate Services Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to bring forward by-laws to: 1. Adopt Tax Billing and Collection Policy No. AF020; 2. Repeal Tax Collection Policy No. FS19; 3. Repeal Property Tax Pre-Authorized Debit Plans By-law No. 2013-094; and 4. Amend By-law No. 2026-041, “Tax Policy By-law” respecting the method of pre-authorized tax payments for final billing to reference Policy AF020." 8.c Clerks None. 8.d Corporate and Facility Services None. 8.e Fire None. 8.f Human Resources None. 8.g Information Technology None. 8.h Parking and By-law Enforcement None. 9. MATTERS POSTPONED There were no matters postponed. 10. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There were no motions for which notice was previously given. 11. CORRESPONDENCE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION There were no correspondence items presented for information. 4 Page 289 of 304 12. DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS There was no additional business. 13. NOTICES OF MOTION There were no notices of motion. 14. ADJOURNMENT The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Chair Kukreja adjourned the meeting at 5:54 p.m. 5 Page 290 of 304 Minutes Tom Thomson Art Gallery Advisory Committee May 6, 2026, 2:00 p.m. City Hall - 808 2nd Avenue East - Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Peter Tovell Vice Chair Lynda Montgomery Deputy Mayor Scott Greig Member Tiffany James Councillor Marion Koepke Member Katharine Lochnan Member Kelsey Starr STAFF PRESENT: Pam Coulter, Director of Community Services Aidan Ware, Director and Chief Curator - Art Gallery, Culture, Tourism Christina McLean, Committee and Executive Support Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Tovell called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. 2. CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS There was no additional business. 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.a Minutes of the Tom Thomson Art Gallery Advisory Committee meeting held on February 4, 2026 1 Page 291 of 304 AG-260506-001 "THAT the minutes of the Tom Thomson Art Gallery Advisory Committee meeting held on February 4, 2026 be received and the recommendations contained therein be approved." 5. DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS There were no deputations or presentations. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There were no questions or comments from the public. 7. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION IS REQUIRED There were no correspondence items presented for consideration. 8. REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 8.a Report AG-26-002 from the Director and Chief Curator Re: May 2026 Update Report The Director and Chief Curator provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware clarified that the OPEN card is a collaboration between the TOM, the Owen Sound and North Grey Union Public Library, the Billy Bishop Museum, and the Marine and Rail Waterfront Museum; which grants free admission to all of the institutions and is available to anyone who is eligible for a library card. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that "meaningful interactions" as referenced in the report refers to the instances where a discussion or engagement takes place with the individuals who enter the facility. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that the Emergence exhibition was not juried and focused on an inclusive approach to engage as many students in the process as possible. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that there is not an artist's talk respecting the Forecast exhibition planned at this time. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that the Operations Coordinator works with a group of volunteers to select the films for the Gallery Night at the Movies events, and that the possibility of a working group could be considered in the new year. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that a series of public talks could be planned for 2027 to honour Tom Thomson's 150th birthday as well as the gallery's 60th year. She added that other possible items that could be 2 Page 292 of 304 planned for the celebrations include featuring the recent acquisitions of Tom Thomson works or highlighting the impact of other individuals on Tom Thomson's life and legacy. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that there isn't a specific date planned for celebrating the milestone year, and that instead a yearlong celebration is the focus. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that the extra revenue from the sales desk and gift shop relates to the increased selection of inventory that was brought in within the last year. She added that having Tourism services located at the TOM could have also influenced the amount of merchandise sold. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that the line respecting collection donations reflects donations that were for specific items, such as restoration, appraisals or collections care, while the regular donations line reflects general donations to the gallery. She added that the option to make online donations is planned to be implemented in the future. In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Community Services noted that the Tip Tap Pay station is going to be wrapped and relocated to increase convenience and visibility. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that the first three months of the year tend to be slower for visitor numbers, and that none of the figures in the year-to-date budget lines as presented are unusual for this time of year. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Ware noted that net revenue could be included in future reports. AG-260506-002 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report AG-26-002 respecting the May 2026 Art Gallery Update Report, the Tom Thomson Art Gallery Advisory Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 9. REPORTS OF WORKING GROUPS 9.a Update Report from the Fundraising Team Member Starr provided an overview of the fundraising team update, highlighting the wrap up of the 2026 calendar campaign and recognizing the work of the previous Fundraising Team Chair Mary Anne Alton. 3 Page 293 of 304 9.b Update Report from the Art Collection Team There was no update from the Art Collection Team. 10. MATTERS POSTPONED There were no matters postponed. 11. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There were no motions for which notice was previously given. 12. CORRESPONDENCE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION There were no correspondence items presented for information. 13. DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS There was no additional business. 14. NOTICES OF MOTION There were no notices of motion. 15. ADJOURNMENT The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Chair Tovell adjourned the meeting at 2:55 p.m. 4 Page 294 of 304 Minutes Operations Committee May 21, 2026, 5:30 p.m. City Hall - 808 2nd Avenue East - Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Scott Greig Vice Chair Jon Farmer Member Donald Anderson Member Arlene Blue Indoe Councillor Brock Hamley (via video) Member Michele Hawkins Member Graham Jordan Councillor Carol Merton Member Aletta Schurter STAFF PRESENT: Lara Widdifield, Director of Public Works and Engineering Kate Allan, Director of Corporate Services Mason Bellamy, Manager of Public Works and Engineering Bryce McDonald, Manager of Water and Wastewater Christina McLean, Committee and Executive Support Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Greig called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. 3. CALL FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS 2.a Councillor Merton Re: Recent Pedestrian Accident Involving a Child at Alpha Street and 13th Street A West 2.b Member Anderson Re: Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2.c Vice Chair Farmer Re: Opportunities for Public Outreach Respecting Traffic Calming Measures DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 1 Page 295 of 304 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.a Minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on April 23, 2026 OP-260521-001 "THAT the Operations Committee approves the minutes of the meeting held on April 23, 2026." 5. DEPUTATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS There were no deputations or presentations. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There were no questions or comments from the public. 7. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR WHICH DIRECTION IS REQUIRED There were no correspondence items presented for consideration. 8. REPORTS OF CITY STAFF 8.a Water and Wastewater 8.a.1 Report OP-26-028 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring Initiative The Director of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that this report refers to foundation drainage systems that are connected to the sanitary sewer instead of the storm sewer and therefore are draining ground water into the sanitary system. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that the programs outlined in the report would happen in the future, and that the flow monitoring needs to be completed in order to determine the nature of the extraneous flow and to pinpoint where it is coming from. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that a communications campaign would occur when this program is taking place to remind property owners of the importance of water being drained into the correct system. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that flow monitoring is anticipated to happen for a year or two before upgrades are made. 2 Page 296 of 304 In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that interconnections between sanitary and storm sewers have existed in the City for many years. She added that while some improvements have been made and flow monitors are already installed at certain cross connection points, there is still work to be completed. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that smoke testing has been completed in the past and added that there are other methods for testing available as well. OP-260521-002 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-028 respecting the Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring Initiative, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.a.2 Report CR-26-052 from the Director of Corporate Services Re: 2026 Water Rate and Sewer Surcharge Update The Director of Corporate Services provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that the current recommended rate structure is sufficient to fully fund the operating budget and planned capital projects, and that the outstanding balances shown in the gaps of the reserve balances would be required for contingency and for larger projects that aren't currently costed or prioritized. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan clarified that properties that do not use the City's sewer system but receive City water are charged double the regular water rate in absence of the sewer surcharge. In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Public Works and Engineering noted that a capital needs study is currently being undertaken on the City's water and wastewater treatment plants which will help to inform costs and prioritize the actual process equipment that needs to be replaced in the future. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that the first step in working towards the change to monthly billing is getting the user interface online, which is aimed to occur in the coming months. Ms. Allan added that the online system will allow users to see their usage in real time, which can help with budgeting and leak detection. 3 Page 297 of 304 In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that while the water rates are consistent with the Hemson report, they are recalculated annually based on the updated capital plan and operating budget. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that it is too early to determine the impacts that the new water meters may have on overall water charges. Ms. Allan added that one of the driving factors behind the meter replacement project was to improve the customer service experience by enabling users to see daily water usage and transition to monthly billing. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that the annual rate update considers the balance of the reserves from the previous year, and as such, prior year surpluses or deficits are captured. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Allan noted that there is an estimate included in the budget for the total number of meters that are added for growth annually, and that if growth was high enough, there may be a year that doesn't require as much of a rate increase. OP-260521-003 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report CR-26-052 respecting the 2026 Water Rate and Sewer Surcharge Update, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to: 1. Include in the 2026 Fees and Charges By-law, to take effect for the July 2026 billing cycles: a. A five percent (5%) increase to water rates; and b. A reduction of the sewer surcharge from 124% to 120%; and 2. Provide notice of the water rate updates in accordance with the City’s Notice By-law." The Director of Corporate Services left the meeting. 8.a.3 Report OP-26-023 from the Manager of Water and Wastewater Re: Walking Beam Flocculator Update The Manager of Water and Wastewater provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald clarified that an emergency purchase is being undertaken due to the additional time constraints that would be involved for a traditional tender process for the 4 Page 298 of 304 design and installation of the equipment. He noted that this way, the project can be completed before having to undergo another spring thaw and the risk of potential source water issues. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald noted that if there are additional issues with the current flocculator before replacement, there is the ability to manage by flowing water through the flocculator and recirculating the water in different ways in cases of emergency while the flocculator is down. He added that the timeframes could be adjusted to speed things up once the project is underway. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald noted that the technologies between the current walking beam flocculator to the proposed vertical power wheel are very different, and that the vertical power wheel is considered to be more consistent and predictable. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald noted that no additional approvals are required to meet regulations as the mixing rate and speed calculation will not be changed. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald noted that a vertical paddle wheel flocculator was chosen as it is now one of the most common types of technologies as it provides the ability to lighten the weight of the paddles and the drive motor requires less power than other types of flocculators. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. McDonald noted that there are no anticipated conflicts between this project and the filter refurbishments currently underway at the treatment plant. OP-260521-004 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-023 respecting the Walking Beam Flocculator Update, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.b Engineering 8.b.1 Report OP-26-024 from the Engineering Technologist Re: 2026 Road Resurfacing Program The Director of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the report. 5 Page 299 of 304 OP-260521-005 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-024 respecting the 2026 Road Resurfacing Program, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.b.2 Report OP-26-027 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: 27th St W Storm Sewer Emergency Replacement The Director of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that if the project were to exceed the projected budget, the difference would be funded from the Stormwater Reserve. In response to a question from Committee, the Manager of Public Works and Engineering noted that there will be temporary closures while this project is underway, and that detours will be posted for northbound and southbound traffic as well as for the affected transit route. OP-260521-006 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-026-027 respecting 27th Street West Storm Sewer Emergency Replacement, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.b.3 Report OP-26-029 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: Kenny Drain Pond Cleanout and Expansion The Director of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, the Manager of Public Works and Engineering noted that this is the pond located adjacent to the soccer complex property to the north of the rail trail, and that this is one of the high priority projects identified in the Stormwater Master Plan that is currently underway. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. Bellamy noted that the sediment fill in the pond will be tested before it leaves the site to determine an appropriate location for disposal based on whether it is contaminated or not. 6 Page 300 of 304 In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that a properly functioning storm pond should not become a concerning mosquito harbouring environment like standing water sources do. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. Bellamy clarified that the initial cost of $1.2 million was for a like-for-like cleanout of the pond, and that with growth and changes over past years this project has expanded. OP-260521-007 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-029 respecting the Kenny Drain Pond Cleanout and Expansion, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.c Public Works 8.c.1 Report OP-26-026 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: Business Case for Sand Dome Replacement The Director of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the report. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that this project will be added to the unfunded list of the long-term capital plan at this time, and added that funding could be determined for a future year as the structure is still functional at this time. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that the structures can be inspected to determine their remaining useful life or if there is any work that could be done to prolong this, she added that this project was once listed in the long-term capital plan, but that the cost has increased significantly since that time. In response to a question from Committee, Ms. Widdifield noted that staff will apply to any applicable grant opportunities for the project if they arise. In response to a question from Committee, the Manager of Public Works and Engineering clarified that the tarp-over-steel as outlined in the report can refer to a multitude of materials, and that the proposed structure would be constructed of a long-lasting material such as galvanized or stainless steel. In response to a question from Committee, Mr. Bellamy noted that options could be provided once it is time to move forward with the project, adding that challenges include the increased cost of materials and changing regulations. 7 Page 301 of 304 OP-260521-008 "THAT in consideration of Staff Report OP-26-026 respecting the Business Case for a Sand Dome Replacement, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive the report for information purposes." 8.d Environment None. 8.e Transit None. Councillor Hamley left the meeting. 9. MATTERS POSTPONED There were no matters postponed. 10. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN 10.a Motion for Which Notice was Previously Given by Councillor Farmer at the April 23, 2026 Operations Committee Meeting Re: Crash Analysis Working Group In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Public Works and Engineering noted that the Transportation Master Plan is currently scheduled for 2028, and that any findings from the proposed working group could be used to help inform that plan. She added that the plan is intended to include all types of transportation, including cycling, transit, pedestrian, and vehicular. OP-260521-009 "WHEREAS the City of Owen Sound receives annual collision statistics identifying the intersections with the highest numbers of collisions; AND WHEREAS it is widely accepted by organizations ranging from the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers, to Strong Towns, and the Owen Sound Police Service that street design is a contributing factor to rates of collision and injury; AND WHEREAS the City of Owen Sound currently has no mechanism by which to examine the common design or operational factors that contribute to higher numbers of collisions at certain intersections or to identify possible safety interventions; 8 Page 302 of 304 AND WHEREAS Strong Towns has developed a tool called the Crash Analysis Studio to assist municipalities and individuals in identifying and addressing patterns and contributing factors to crashes; AND WHEREAS the City of Owen Sound has updated the board and committee structure for the next term of Council to simplify the striking of working groups to assess and bring recommendations to address specific problems on set timelines; NOW THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED THAT: 1. The Operations Committee requests that following the 2026 municipal election, Owen Sound strike a crash analysis working group for 2027; 2. The working group consist of 3-5 members; 3. The working group analyze contributing factors and identify potential safety interventions for the three intersections with the highest numbers of reported collisions in 2025: a. 10th Street/9th Avenue East (15 collisions); b. 16th Street/9th Avenue East (14 collisions); c. 10th Street/4th Avenue East (14 collisions); and 4. The working group deliver their final report to the September 2027 committee meeting." 11. CORRESPONDENCE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION 11.a Memo from Grey County Re: Waste Management Service Review The Manager of Public Works and Engineering provided an overview of the correspondence. OP-260521-010 "THAT in consideration of correspondence provided for information purposes listed on the May 21, 2026 Operations Committee agenda, the Operations Committee recommends that City Council receive Item 11.a for information purposes." 9 Page 303 of 304 12. DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS 12.a Recent Pedestrian Accident Involving a Child at Alpha Street and 13th Street A West Councillor Merton provided comments respecting a recent pedestrian accident involving a child being struck by a vehicle, and highlighted concerns from the community regarding possible infrastructure or design changes to the area, including the installation of a grass strip, a community safety zone, an additional crosswalk, or a crossing guard. In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Public Works and Engineering noted that the City recognizes the seriousness of the incident and are in contact with Police Services. She added that the City will complete any required action once the police investigation is complete, and any infrastructure changes required would flow through the normal processes of project approval. 12.b Global Accessibility Awareness Day Member Anderson advised that May 21 is Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD), highlighting the importance of being aware of how the buildings, streets, and technology we all use is accessible to everyone. 12.c Opportunities for Public Outreach Respecting Traffic Calming Measures Vice Chair Farmer asked staff to provide an update on how the community can provide input or requests for traffic calming measures within the City's current policies. In response to a question from Committee, the Director of Public Works and Engineering noted that there is a policy, Policy PRT001, which pertains to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming and is available on the City's website. She added that this policy outlines what traffic calming is and how it is requested by the community. 13. NOTICES OF MOTION 13.a Councillor Merton Re: Recent Pedestrian Accident Involving a Child Councillor Merton presented the following Notice of Motion that was supported by Vice Chair Farmer: "THAT the Operations Committee recommends that City Council direct staff to provide an update relating to the concerns and suggestions provided by citizens respecting the recent accident involving a 4-year-old child to a future meeting of the Operations Committee.” 14. ADJOURNMENT The business contained on the agenda having been completed, Chair Greig adjourned the meeting at 8:04 p.m. 10 Page 304 of 304
13 Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences: • Hawker and Peddler Licence issued to Brightshores Health System for the Brightshores MHA Coffee House Event at the
Final approvals were issued for a Hawker and Peddler Licence to Brightshores Health System for a coffee house event at the Owen Sound Farmers' Market, alongside an annual licence for fireworks sales by Billy G Amusements Inc.
13 Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences: • Hawker and Peddler Licence issued to Brightshores Health System for the Brightshores MHA Coffee House Event at the Final approvals issued for the following Business Licences: • Hawker and Peddler Licence issued to Brightshores Health System for the Brightshores MHA Coffee House Event at the Owen Sound Farmers' Market on May 26, 2026 • Annual Hawker and Peddler Licence issued to Billy G Amusements Inc. for the sale of fireworks at 1266 16th Street East Correspondence received which is presented for the information of Council COMMITTEE MINUTES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL 12.a Minutes of the Corporate Services Committee meeting held on May 7, 12.b Minutes of the Tom Thomson Art Gallery Advisory Committee meeting held on May 6, 2026 12.c Minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on May 21, 2026 MATTERS POSTPONED There are no postponed matters.
14 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given.
No motions requiring prior notice were presented for this agenda item.
14 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN There are no motions for which notice was previously given.
15 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
The section contains no substantive discussion, facts, or newsworthy events as the source excerpt provides only a header.
15 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
16 th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation
The agenda item addresses the rehabilitation of the 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel, a critical infrastructure project aimed at improving pedestrian safety and accessibility within the urban fabric. This initiative is part of broader reconstruction efforts along 4th Avenue West, signaling a commitment to upgrading public spaces for community use. The report from the Director of Public Works and Engineering outlines the next steps for this essential work, ensuring that the tunnel remains a safe and functional thoroughfare for residents and visitors alike.
16 th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel Rehabilitation 10.c Report OP-26-031 from the Director of Public Works and Engineering Re: 4th Avenue West Reconstruction (15th Street to 20th Street) Next Steps 10.d Verbal Report from the Deputy Mayor Re: Grey County Council CONSENT AGENDA 11.a Report CS-26-040 from the Director and Chief Curator - Art Gallery, Culture, Tourism Re: Short-Term Cultural Facility Parking 11.b Report CR-26-050 from the City Clerk Re: Policy Consolidation Council Seating and Appointments Policy No. GOV001 11.c Report CR-26-046 from the City Clerk Re: Appointment of a By-law Enforcement Officer 11.d Report CR-26-051 from the Manager of Legislative Services Re: Encroachment Application - 790 2nd Avenue East 11.e Report CR-26-055 from the Manager of Legislative Services Re: 1182 and 1186 3rd Avenue West – Proposed Sale of Adjacent Land and Public Comments 11.f Report CR-26-054 from the Deputy Treasurer Re: 2026 Fees and Charges 11.g Report OP-26-030 from the Manager of Public Works and Engineering Re: Dedication of Land as Highway - Part 5, Plan 16R-1225 11.h Report CR-26-048 from the Purchasing and Claims Coordinator Re: Approval of Non-Standard Procurement - Wastewater Treatment Plant Digestor Clean-Out 11.i Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: Owen Sound Housing Company meetings held on January 21, 2026, February 9, 2026, March 16, 2026, and April 20, 2026 11.j Minutes of Boards and Committees for Receipt Re: River District Board of Management meeting held on March 11, 2026 11.k 11.l
17 MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The House moved to adopt proceedings in Committee of the Whole.
17 MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MOTION TO ADOPT PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
18 NOTICES OF MOTION
The section contains notices of motion without specific details.
18 NOTICES OF MOTION NOTICES OF MOTION
19 MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:
The City Council is moving into a closed session to consider an agenda item.
19 MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider: MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION "THAT City Council now move into 'Closed Session' to consider:
20 REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
The agenda item reports the conclusion of a closed session.
20 REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION REPORTING OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
21 BY-LAWS
The agenda confirms the Regular Meeting proceedings and appoints a By-law Enforcement Officer to strengthen local oversight. Council authorises agreements with the Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board for capital recovery and building permits at 2753 15th Street East, alongside a rehabilitation contract with E.C. King Contracting for the 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel. A Memorandum of Understanding is established with the County of Grey to advance Team Grey economic initiatives.
21 BY-LAWS BY-LAWS 21.a By-law No. 2026-058 "A By-law to confirm the proceedings of the Regular Meeting of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Owen Sound held on the 25th day of May, 2026" 21.b By-law No. 2026-059 "A By-law to amend Appointed Officers By-law No. 2015-054 to appoint a By-law Enforcement Officer" 21.c By-law No. 2026-060 "A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Capital Cost Recovery Agreement with Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board, respecting development at 2753 15th Street East" 21.d By-law No. 2026-061 "A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Conditional Building Permit Agreement with Bruce Grey Catholic District School Board, respecting development at 2753 15th Street East" 21.e By-law No. 2026-062 "A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement with E.C. King Contracting, a division of Miller Paving Limited, respecting the rehabilitation of the 16th Street East Pedestrian Tunnel, in accordance with RFT-26-004" 21.f By-law No. 2026-063 "A By-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with The Corporation of the County of Grey, respecting economic development initiatives (Team Grey)" 21.g By-law No. 2026-064 "A By-law to amend Traffic By-law No. 2009-075 to add two short-term parking spaces on 1st Avenue West, adjacent to the North Grey Union Public Library and Tom Thomson Art Gallery buildings"
22 ADJOURNMENT
The assembly adjourned.
22 ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT