Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — September 11, 2025
Hook: Brightshores Wellness Centre Emergency Return Rates
Grey County · Committee of the Whole · September 11, 2025
Summary
The Committee of the Whole convened on September 11, 2025, to consider operational updates, staffing settlements, and infrastructure requests across Grey County. The session moved quickly from procedural items to substantive decisions on road safety, tax classifications, and service provider agreements, concluding with a review of facility maintenance needs.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting minutes dated September 3, 2025: Council adopted the Agricultural Advisory Committee minutes dated September 3, 2025, and endorsed resolutions to receive a report on nuisance animal bylaw reviews and consider feedback regarding beaver, coyote, and wolf bylaws. A speaker noted that staff would explore education on non-lethal control methods and collaborate with farmers and trappers, acknowledging that trapping is a last resort due to insufficient compensation for equipment and mileage costs.
- PDR-CW-51-25 MTO Resolution Request - Grey Road 5: A speaker moved a resolution to receive Report PDRCW 5125 and support a Ministry of Transportation request prohibiting a future fourth leg extension at the proposed intersection of Grey Road Five and New City Street. A subsequent amendment was moved and seconded to adjust the motion's design speed parameters, specifically requesting a staff report on reducing the limit to sixty kilometres per hour for the school zone; this amendment was carried by voice vote.
- HRR-CW-02-25 Unifor Rockwood Terrace Negotiated Settlement: The meeting heard a report from Director Morrow regarding collective bargaining results between Rockwood Terrace and Unifor Local 302, detailing a new memorandum of settlement for Walkerterra staff that includes wage increases, benefit enhancements such as long-term disability coverage improvements, and an additional paid holiday for Indigenous staff. A motion was moved to receive the report, ratify the recommendations, and authorise the signing of the new collective agreements; Councillor Eccles asked if boot premiums were considered for pay equity, receiving a response that they are based on work duties rather than pay equity comparisons.
- Council Defeats Amendment on Tax Subclass Report: Council voted on an amendment to request a staff report regarding financial impacts of a new multi-residential property tax subclass, which was defeated with 49 votes against and 31 in favour. Following the vote, Council took a brief break before returning to consider the main motion for item 7F, which was received for information.
- FR-CW-17-25 New Multi-Residential Property Tax Subclass Options and Considerations: The meeting defeated an amendment to a motion regarding new multi-residential property tax subclass options by a vote of 49 to 31. Following the defeat of the amendment, the main motion to receive report FRCW 1725 for information was carried.
- CSR-CW-19-25 Administration Building Roof: A motion was moved by Councillor Carleton and seconded by Councillor DeBree to receive the report regarding roof repairs for the Gray County Administration Building, utilise Garland Canada to complete the work using unbudgeted funding from the 2025 property budget surplus, and transfer remaining funds from the Administration Properties Reserve. The motion was moved and seconded but no vote outcome or adoption is recorded in the source window.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- Committee of the Whole
- Date
- September 11, 2025
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
A speaker stated they would now call to order the Committee of the Whole of September 11th, 2025, and then asked for the agenda.
00:39:03 Speaker 64: to now call to order this
00:39:05 Speaker 64: committee of the whole of September
00:39:07 Speaker 64: 11th, 2025. And at this point
00:39:08 Speaker 64: in time, I'll ask for this
2 Declaration of Interest
The Chair asked for declarations of interest, saw none raised, and proceeded to business.
00:39:09 Speaker 64: agenda. Are there any declarations of
00:39:11 Speaker 65: interest? Seeing no hands raised, we'll
00:39:13 Speaker 65: move on. Business arising for minutes,
00:39:15 Speaker 65: and with that, we will begin.
4 Delegations
Two delegations were scheduled for the morning session.
00:39:16 Speaker 65: With we have two delegations this
00:39:18 Speaker 65: morning. The first one is going
00:39:19 Speaker 65: to be from Bright Shores Foundation,
4.a Brightshores Foundation One Year Update (Amy McKinnon, Naomi Vodden and Ann Ford)
Amy McKinnon, Naomi Vodden, and Ann Ford presented a one-year update on the Brightshores Foundation's Wellness and Recovery Centre, expressing gratitude for a million-dollar County of Bruce commitment. The presentation highlighted specific successes, including a 65% reduction in emergency department visit return rates over five years, stable housing for 31 homeless patients, and 33,000 outpatient visits delivered between June and June. Speakers noted capacity constraints that paused intakes from outside the area, reducing the waitlist to 45 individuals while offering remote programming access via tablets. The facility is located at 615 6th Street A East in the old Baby School building, where single rooms were converted to double rooms to optimize space. Future plans include finishing roof and kitchen renovations, exploring partnerships with CMHA for food services, and developing a greenhouse vision for food provision. Staffing updates revealed over sixty staff members on site daily, including mental health teams and an addiction programme of approximately 32 staff. The organisation aims to merge historically separate mental health and addictions programmes to achieve cost savings and synergies. A speaker requested participation in the next strategic plan process, noting engagement with residents and businesses will begin in October and November to gather feedback on healthcare needs.
00:39:20 Speaker 65: and it is the one-year update.
00:39:21 Speaker 65: And so, I would like to
00:39:24 Speaker 65: invite our presenters to come forward
00:39:25 Speaker 65: at this point in time. And
00:39:27 Speaker 65: the clerks will provide assistance with
00:39:29 Speaker 66: the lecter and Mike. And I
00:39:32 Speaker 66: understand you have a presentation. So
00:39:33 Speaker 66: make sure you're all set up.
00:39:35 Speaker 67: Okay. Yes. Good morning, Warden and
00:39:37 Speaker 67: members of Council. We're really delighted
00:39:39 Speaker 67: to be here this morning. My
00:39:40 Speaker 67: name is Amy McKinnon, and I'm
00:39:45 Speaker 67: the CEO of the Bright Shores
00:39:46 Speaker 67: Foundation. With me today is Naomi
00:39:49 Speaker 67: Vodden, who's the director of mental
00:39:52 Speaker 67: health and addictions programme at Bright
00:39:53 Speaker 67: Shores, and Ann Ford is here
00:39:55 Speaker 67: as well, and she's the CEO
00:39:57 Speaker 67: of Bright Shores, and she'll join
00:40:00 Speaker 67: us up here at towards the
00:40:02 Speaker 67: end of our presentation. Today, we're
00:40:04 Speaker 67: here for a couple reasons. First
00:40:05 Speaker 67: of all, we're very grateful for
00:40:08 Speaker 67: the million dollars. commitment from the
00:40:11 Speaker 67: County of Bruce to the Wellness
00:40:13 Speaker 67: and Recovery Centre, and we just
00:40:14 Speaker 67: recently celebrated our one-year anniversary in
00:40:16 Speaker 67: June of having clients in the
00:40:18 Speaker 68: building. So we're here today to
00:40:51 Speaker 69: share with you some of the
00:40:54 Speaker 69: successes of the one-year anniversary, and
00:40:56 Speaker 69: just to further share with you,
00:40:58 Speaker 69: this model of care was grown
00:41:00 Speaker 69: here out of Brightshore staff. So
00:41:02 Speaker 69: this model of care that was
00:41:03 Speaker 70: developed for the Wellness and Recovery
00:41:07 Speaker 71: Centre for treating mental health addictions
00:41:10 Speaker 71: is now being modeled across the
00:41:12 Speaker 71: province. There's 19 facilities across the
00:41:16 Speaker 71: province that are going to be
00:41:18 Speaker 71: built, and Naomi and her team
00:41:19 Speaker 71: have had many tours and discussions
00:41:22 Speaker 71: with these other municipalities that are
00:41:23 Speaker 71: having being built these committee. So
00:41:26 Speaker 71: I am going to hand it
00:41:28 Speaker 71: over to Naomi, who's going to
00:41:30 Speaker 71: share with you more about the
00:41:33 Speaker 71: facility and the successes after the
00:41:36 Speaker 71: first year. Okay. Good morning. Thank
00:41:40 Speaker 71: you for inviting us today, and
00:41:42 Speaker 71: a really big echo of Amy's
00:41:44 Speaker 71: words. Thank you for the funding
00:41:46 Speaker 71: for this project. It's been very
00:41:48 Speaker 71: exciting. I'm going to try to
00:41:50 Speaker 71: lean forward here. I'm too short.
00:41:52 Speaker 71: So, as Amy indicated, the facility's
00:41:54 Speaker 71: been open for a year,
00:41:57 Speaker 71: from June, and we've had just
00:42:00 Speaker 71: really exciting successes. So, just to
00:42:02 Speaker 71: recap for those of you who
00:42:04 Speaker 71: don't remember or are new. just
00:42:07 Speaker 71: some of the services that we
00:42:10 Speaker 71: have. So we have a three-week
00:42:12 Speaker 71: detox programme, more traditionally called detox,
00:42:14 Speaker 71: but we call it withdrawal management.
00:42:16 Speaker 71: We have a 90-day treatment programme,
00:42:19 Speaker 71: and we have long-term supportive stabilization
00:42:21 Speaker 71: for up to 10 patients, clients,
00:42:25 Speaker 71: and they can stay up to
00:42:31 Speaker 71: a year. We also have community
00:42:33 Speaker 72: addiction programmemes. We have a lot
00:42:35 Speaker 72: of walk-in services every day. Clients
00:42:37 Speaker 72: can attend a walk-in if they're
00:42:39 Speaker 73: To walk in if they're just
00:42:44 Speaker 73: feeling ready and want to connect,
00:42:46 Speaker 73: we have community mental health programmemes
00:42:48 Speaker 73: as well, and walk-in and outpatient
00:42:51 Speaker 73: leisure recreation programmemes. We have our
00:42:53 Speaker 73: injection and clozapine clinics, which are
00:42:56 Speaker 73: our main tools for stabilizing long-term
00:42:59 Speaker 73: mental health patients. We have peer
00:43:00 Speaker 73: and family support, which we've really
00:43:02 Speaker 73: had some great success with. Our
00:43:06 Speaker 73: family members are really grateful for
00:43:09 Speaker 73: an opportunity to connect with a
00:43:12 Speaker 73: worker, especially when their family member.
00:43:14 Speaker 73: And their family member is not
00:43:16 Speaker 73: quite ready for treatment. We've had
00:43:17 Speaker 73: some great partnerships, and the meals
00:43:21 Speaker 73: in in are provided by CMHA.
00:43:23 Speaker 73: And I just wanted to highlight
00:43:25 Speaker 73: one of the clients that I
00:43:27 Speaker 73: just got an email about today.
00:43:31 Speaker 73: And this was a patient that
00:43:34 Speaker 73: was homeless and from Neahshinuming, and
00:43:36 Speaker 73: he's been followed by SOS when
00:43:38 Speaker 73: he's in. this area, he's been
00:43:40 Speaker 73: followed by our crisis teams, M
00:43:41 Speaker 73: Hart through CMHA and M Cert
00:43:43 Speaker 73: through our hospital programmemes. By OPP,
00:43:45 Speaker 73: by Owen Sound Police. Let's see
00:43:48 Speaker 73: if I'm missing anyone because there
00:43:49 Speaker 73: is a lot of people involved.
00:43:51 Speaker 73: Our merged departments and I got
00:43:52 Speaker 73: an email today from OPP just
00:43:54 Speaker 73: stating how grateful they were that
00:43:58 Speaker 73: this the I would say the
00:44:00 Speaker 73: Wellness Centre along with the SOS
00:44:02 Speaker 73: team, have been working so well
00:44:04 Speaker 73: together and providing an opportunity to
00:44:06 Speaker 73: collabourate and a central hub to
00:44:07 Speaker 73: collabourate. And that this individual now
00:44:10 Speaker 73: has finished their treatment programme at
00:44:12 Speaker 73: the wellness centre and is moving
00:44:14 Speaker 73: into their next stage of of
00:44:16 Speaker 73: housing. So this person was very
00:44:18 Speaker 73: unstable, very unwell, and I really
00:44:20 Speaker 73: think it's a collabourative between all
00:44:22 Speaker 73: of our partners. But I would
00:44:24 Speaker 73: say with the hub with SOS
00:44:27 Speaker 73: and the Wellness and Recovery Centre.
00:44:31 Speaker 73: We've seen this great success. So
00:44:33 Speaker 73: in terms, so that's more the
00:44:36 Speaker 73: people part of the success, but
00:44:39 Speaker 73: we also have the numbers part
00:44:41 Speaker 73: of the success. And so I've
00:44:44 Speaker 73: got the chart here, and so
00:44:49 Speaker 73: initially on this chart, what we
00:44:51 Speaker 74: saw is one of the metrics
00:44:56 Speaker 73: we track track is our thirty
00:44:59 Speaker 73: day readmits to our emerge departments,
00:45:02 Speaker 73: because we know that this is
00:45:06 Speaker 73: not the best place for mental
00:45:09 Speaker 73: health and addiction clients in the
00:45:12 Speaker 73: emerge. so we track that to
00:45:15 Speaker 73: try to make sure that we're
00:45:18 Speaker 73: diverting them once they come in
00:45:20 Speaker 73: to emerge. And so, what we've
00:45:21 Speaker 73: seen over the last five years
00:45:24 Speaker 73: is, well, on this chart, 30%
00:45:26 Speaker 73: reduction. But we just got updated
00:45:28 Speaker 73: data, and it stated 65% reduction
00:45:29 Speaker 73: in ED visit that return rate.
00:45:33 Speaker 73: So, some really great successes because
00:45:35 Speaker 73: we know that this provides an
00:45:37 Speaker 73: opportunity for our patients and. clients
00:45:40 Speaker 73: to get faster access to the
00:45:42 Speaker 73: emergent department for other issues, and
00:45:44 Speaker 73: also more appropriate access to services
00:45:47 Speaker 73: for our mental health and addiction
00:45:50 Speaker 73: clients. So to highlight, we have
00:45:51 Speaker 73: fifty eight percent of our clients
00:45:53 Speaker 73: from Grey County. We have being
00:45:55 Speaker 73: a Ontario wide programme. We've developed
00:45:58 Speaker 73: a triaging system. Develop a triaging
00:46:01 Speaker 73: system so individuals from Indigenous are
00:46:05 Speaker 73: ranked on the triage sheet first,
00:46:07 Speaker 73: and people from Grey Bruce are
00:46:09 Speaker 73: second. So our waitlist did go
00:46:10 Speaker 73: up. We were taking people from
00:46:12 Speaker 73: outside of the area on our
00:46:15 Speaker 73: waitlist, but with these this triage
00:46:17 Speaker 73: in place, we weren't able to
00:46:19 Speaker 73: really accommodate them, and our waitlist
00:46:22 Speaker 73: grew up to 65 people, which
00:46:24 Speaker 73: wasn't really so really able to
00:46:27 Speaker 73: accommodate. So what we've done is
00:46:29 Speaker 73: we've we've held off on even
00:46:33 Speaker 73: taking the intakes from people outside
00:46:34 Speaker 73: Grapers, and so our wait list
00:46:36 Speaker 73: now is 45 individuals. But we've
00:46:37 Speaker 73: developed a really creative model in
00:46:39 Speaker 73: which those people that are on
00:46:43 Speaker 73: the wait list can come in
00:46:45 Speaker 73: for day programmeming if they're from
00:46:48 Speaker 73: Owen Sound. They can have access
00:46:49 Speaker 73: to a tablet, and they can
00:46:51 Speaker 73: have have remote access to programmeming
00:46:54 Speaker 73: while they're waiting. And we've developed.
00:46:57 Speaker 73: a partnership with our crisis support
00:46:59 Speaker 73: programme, which is off the emerge,
00:47:01 Speaker 73: to take two people that are
00:47:06 Speaker 73: on the wait list that are
00:47:10 Speaker 73: more acute. We've also prioritized people
00:47:13 Speaker 73: that SOS wants to bring in,
00:47:18 Speaker 73: and so we've gone to over
00:47:19 Speaker 73: capacity to flex beds just for
00:47:21 Speaker 73: the people that OS SOS want
00:47:23 Speaker 73: to to to bring in to
00:47:25 Speaker 73: ensure that it's a very complex
00:47:28 Speaker 73: patient population that SOS serves. And
00:47:31 Speaker 73: we really, when they have that
00:47:33 Speaker 73: moment that they want service, we
00:47:37 Speaker 73: wanted to give them a bed,
00:47:38 Speaker 73: even if we were full. So
00:47:41 Speaker 73: we've done thirty-three out, thirty-three thousand
00:47:43 Speaker 73: outpatient visits from June to June,
00:47:46 Speaker 73: which is really quite remarkable, and
00:47:49 Speaker 73: that's a lot of groups, a
00:47:51 Speaker 73: lot of virtual, a lot of
00:47:52 Speaker 73: in-person, and what else can I
00:47:55 Speaker 73: highlight? Thirty-one at the end of
00:47:58 Speaker 73: June, thirty-one patients that were homeless
00:48:00 Speaker 73: prior to going into the programme
00:48:03 Speaker 73: have stable. housing, and so 202
00:48:05 Speaker 73: clients had finished their individualized treatment
00:48:08 Speaker 73: programme. Recognizing that everyone has different
00:48:10 Speaker 73: goals and objectives. Well, just for
00:48:12 Speaker 75: those who you haven't been there,
00:48:15 Speaker 73: you're always welcome to reach out
00:48:18 Speaker 73: for a tour. This is the
00:48:19 Speaker 73: picture of the outside facility. It's
00:48:21 Speaker 73: on 615 Sixth Street A East,
00:48:23 Speaker 73: kind of by the Longmeadow. The
00:48:25 Speaker 73: Longmire Quay Building. It's in the
00:48:27 Speaker 73: old Baby School. This is a
00:48:29 Speaker 73: treatment room, just to give you
00:48:32 Speaker 73: an idea. Just a note: the
00:48:36 Speaker 73: quilts on the beds. So we
00:48:38 Speaker 73: were just really lucky that our
00:48:40 Speaker 73: Quilting Guild donated quilts and ongoing
00:48:43 Speaker 73: quilts to our programme, and this
00:48:45 Speaker 73: just lovely touch just makes it
00:48:47 Speaker 73: feel so much more warm and
00:48:48 Speaker 73: welcoming and less institutional. There's just
00:48:53 Speaker 73: the two-bedroom room. We were. Bedroom
00:48:55 Speaker 73: room. We were originally just doing
00:48:56 Speaker 73: single rooms, and we've changed some
00:48:57 Speaker 73: of those rooms over to double
00:48:59 Speaker 73: rooms in order to optimize our
00:49:02 Speaker 73: space and to ensure we can
00:49:07 Speaker 73: treat as many patients as possible.
00:49:08 Speaker 73: Wanted to highlight this: we have
00:49:12 Speaker 73: a very strong committee that is
00:49:14 Speaker 73: from our clients, and we really
00:49:16 Speaker 73: want to empower them to have
00:49:17 Speaker 73: some control over their life because
00:49:20 Speaker 73: the addiction has had control in
00:49:22 Speaker 73: their life. So we have a
00:49:25 Speaker 73: strong social committee. This group meets
00:49:28 Speaker 73: every Thursday with the staff to
00:49:31 Speaker 73: both address their problems, concerns, and
00:49:33 Speaker 73: and look to improve the programme,
00:49:36 Speaker 73: and as well to plan social
00:49:38 Speaker 73: activities. As one client has said,
00:49:41 Speaker 73: their whole world has been focused
00:49:46 Speaker 73: on their addiction. So how do
00:49:48 Speaker 73: you go now to having a
00:49:52 Speaker 73: healthy social life? This is a
00:49:54 Speaker 73: picture of the Oasis. It's just
00:49:58 Speaker 73: a group room where they can
00:49:59 Speaker 73: do a lot. of arts and
00:50:02 Speaker 73: crafts activities. Again, really trying to
00:50:06 Speaker 73: develop the whole, the whole self.
00:50:08 Speaker 73: The gym, again, just just reminding
00:50:10 Speaker 73: people that our lives are full
00:50:12 Speaker 73: of social and recreation opportunities. And
00:50:14 Speaker 73: clients who have had an addiction
00:50:17 Speaker 73: for many years haven't had those
00:50:19 Speaker 73: developed. So we have a very
00:50:20 Speaker 73: fulsome programme. All of the staff
00:50:22 Speaker 73: have really jumped in. Community partners
00:50:23 Speaker 73: have jumped in. We have even
00:50:26 Speaker 73: a. secretary doing line dancing on
00:50:28 Speaker 73: her noon hour breaks, and we
00:50:30 Speaker 73: have really close relationships with our
00:50:32 Speaker 73: indigenous community. We have an elder
00:50:35 Speaker 73: that comes up twice a week—one,
00:50:36 Speaker 73: one, two different elders—and they do
00:50:38 Speaker 73: group and individual counseling. They provide
00:50:41 Speaker 73: this service to anyone who wants
00:50:42 Speaker 73: it. Actually, not just indigenous. We
00:50:45 Speaker 73: just finished the. Finish the sweat
00:50:47 Speaker 73: lodge, and the fire pit area,
00:50:48 Speaker 73: and I think we've done three,
00:50:52 Speaker 73: maybe four sweats by now. One
00:50:54 Speaker 73: of our non-Indigenous clients made a
00:50:56 Speaker 73: point of telling us that even
00:50:58 Speaker 73: though our that he thought our
00:51:01 Speaker 73: programme was really helpful, really wonderful,
00:51:03 Speaker 73: and had lots to good to
00:51:04 Speaker 73: say, he said it's nothing compared
00:51:06 Speaker 73: to going to this sweat. So
00:51:07 Speaker 73: he was non-Indigenous, went to the
00:51:09 Speaker 73: sweat, and said, "I just had
00:51:11 Speaker 73: so many in." Said I just
00:51:14 Speaker 73: had so many insights into myself
00:51:15 Speaker 73: from going to that sweat, and
00:51:18 Speaker 73: here's just another picture. It's kind
00:51:19 Speaker 73: of neat those stones that you
00:51:22 Speaker 73: see under. On the flip side
00:51:24 Speaker 73: of the stones are positive messages
00:51:25 Speaker 73: written by all the clients because
00:51:28 Speaker 73: the clients work with our indigenous
00:51:30 Speaker 73: partners to build this area. So
00:51:33 Speaker 73: what's next? We're working with the
00:51:35 Speaker 73: Bright Shores Research Institute, and we're
00:51:36 Speaker 73: doing an evaluation just to, not
00:51:40 Speaker 76: just give you these numbers, to
00:51:42 Speaker 76: but really quantify the outcome. The
00:51:43 Speaker 76: outcomes. We're almost done our kitchen.
00:51:45 Speaker 76: No, we're almost done our roof.
00:51:46 Speaker 76: Our kitchen has just started, so
00:51:48 Speaker 76: we've been working hard on workarounds
00:51:49 Speaker 76: with CMHA to provide food services
00:51:51 Speaker 76: for our building. So it will
00:51:52 Speaker 76: be lovely to have the finished
00:51:55 Speaker 76: kitchen for CMHA to work
00:51:58 Speaker 73: out of, and for our clients
00:52:01 Speaker 73: to learn again how to prepare
00:52:03 Speaker 73: a meal and how to, yeah,
00:52:05 Speaker 73: maybe maybe even more than prepare
00:52:07 Speaker 73: a meal. They may be interested
00:52:08 Speaker 73: in food services, and we want
00:52:11 Speaker 73: to do it in time. We
00:52:12 Speaker 77: want to do in time some
00:52:15 Speaker 78: more work on our beautiful property,
00:52:17 Speaker 78: so we're working on just a
00:52:19 Speaker 78: site plan, so we can. As
00:52:20 Speaker 78: we all noted, I think in
00:52:22 Speaker 78: earlier conversations here today, lots of
00:52:23 Speaker 78: funding challenges, but maybe in time,
00:52:25 Speaker 78: there's a small community project that
00:52:26 Speaker 78: can take part of the grounds.
00:52:29 Speaker 78: So this we actually found on
00:52:31 Speaker 78: Google, so it didn't come to
00:52:33 Speaker 78: us directly. So I'll just read
00:52:35 Speaker 79: it. I spent five and a
00:52:40 Speaker 79: half months there, and I'm beyond
00:52:41 Speaker 80: grateful to. the staff and clients.
00:52:45 Speaker 80: It is a programme that you
00:52:47 Speaker 80: can honestly give your life back
00:52:49 Speaker 80: if you put the work in.
00:52:50 Speaker 80: The recovery workers, counselors, facilitators, bubble
00:52:51 Speaker 81: staff—that's the withdrawal management part. Custodians,
00:52:56 Speaker 82: the secretary Crystal, the nurse practitioner
00:52:59 Speaker 83: Robin, and the managers Amy and
00:53:02 Speaker 83: Director Naomi—and I'm sure I missed
00:53:03 Speaker 83: some—are just amazing humans and truly
00:53:06 Speaker 83: treat you like a friend. They
00:53:07 Speaker 83: are rooting for. I am celebrating
00:53:09 Speaker 83: six months of sobriety today. I
00:53:10 Speaker 83: get emotional easy when I hear
00:53:12 Speaker 83: these stories. and I wouldn't be
00:53:15 Speaker 84: able to do that without every
00:53:19 Speaker 84: single person in that building. Please,
00:53:21 Speaker 84: if you're struggling with addictions and
00:53:23 Speaker 84: live in the Gravest region, reach
00:53:26 Speaker 84: out. There is help in life
00:53:29 Speaker 84: after addiction. It's wonderful, and I
00:53:30 Speaker 84: would be remiss to not just
00:53:34 Speaker 84: highlight the work that SOS does
00:53:36 Speaker 84: in collabouration with the Wellness Centre.
00:53:40 Speaker 85: It really is a fulsome partnership.
00:53:43 Speaker 85: Is there any questions for Naomi,
00:53:44 Speaker 85: or do we have time for
00:53:46 Speaker 73: questions? I'll put it out for
00:53:50 Speaker 73: questions, but please don't apologize. It
00:53:52 Speaker 73: just demonstrates the dedication that you
00:53:54 Speaker 73: have to your role and the
00:53:56 Speaker 73: impact that you're making in people's
00:53:58 Speaker 86: lives. Any questions at this point
00:54:00 Speaker 86: in time? We'll go to Councillor
00:54:02 Speaker 86: Greg. Thank you very much for
00:54:04 Speaker 86: the presentation here this afternoon. I
00:54:05 Speaker 86: do have one question. You've got
00:54:06 Speaker 86: a great partnership established with Fresh
00:54:08 Speaker 73: Roots, and we know in town,
00:54:10 Speaker 73: Fresh Roots has been able to
00:54:12 Speaker 73: leverage community gardens well. across this
00:54:15 Speaker 73: country, we have vast amounts of
00:54:18 Speaker 73: underutilised space which exists in schools.
00:54:20 Speaker 87: And I'm just wondering, being an
00:54:23 Speaker 87: old public school, is like community
00:54:25 Speaker 87: garden or gardening facility something that
00:54:26 Speaker 87: you have evaluated or may look
00:54:28 Speaker 87: at in the future terms of
00:54:30 Speaker 87: an opportunity to kind of introduce
00:54:31 Speaker 87: fresh produce and enhance that that
00:54:33 Speaker 87: lively kitchen production area? You've got
00:54:35 Speaker 87: plans for? it. Yes, it's definitely
00:54:41 Speaker 87: on the plan. On the original
00:54:42 Speaker 87: plan, we had a greenhouse as
00:54:44 Speaker 88: well as gardens. Obviously, we have
00:54:47 Speaker 88: to really apply to different ministries
00:54:49 Speaker 88: for that kind of funding. But
00:54:50 Speaker 88: that is one of the projects,
00:54:52 Speaker 88: even the gardens that we envision
00:54:54 Speaker 88: the community could jump in and
00:54:56 Speaker 89: use. So we wanted the site
00:54:59 Speaker 90: plan so that we didn't just
00:55:01 Speaker 91: start putting a garden here and
00:55:04 Speaker 91: a garden there, and then maybe
00:55:05 Speaker 91: you know take up the space
00:55:07 Speaker 91: for the greenhouse vision. So. House
00:55:08 Speaker 91: vision, so it's a very important
00:55:10 Speaker 91: part of our project, and we
00:55:12 Speaker 91: see it also providing food for
00:55:13 Speaker 91: the facility. So it's like right
00:55:15 Speaker 91: now they we have two OT
00:55:17 Speaker 91: leisure aides, we call them occupational
00:55:18 Speaker 92: therapy leisure aides, and they are
00:55:22 Speaker 73: doing some small scale gardening. But
00:55:25 Speaker 93: that is one of the items
00:55:32 Speaker 93: that we look forward to in
00:55:33 Speaker 93: the future, and certainly partnerships are
00:55:35 Speaker 93: the way to go there because
00:55:37 Speaker 94: we don't have that expertise at
00:55:40 Speaker 94: all. Okay, I'll just look around.
00:55:42 Speaker 95: We'll go to Councillor Kevney, and
00:55:46 Speaker 95: then over to Councillor Patterson. Thank
00:55:49 Speaker 95: you, Madam Warden. I just wanted
00:55:51 Speaker 95: to share that last night I
00:55:52 Speaker 95: had the privilege at a board
00:55:54 Speaker 95: meeting to hear a presentation from
00:55:56 Speaker 73: Lavender Lille, who I know works
00:55:58 Speaker 73: with your organisation, and she talked
00:56:00 Speaker 73: to us as a board about
00:56:01 Speaker 73: how to approach someone in crisis
00:56:05 Speaker 73: should they come into that particular
00:56:06 Speaker 96: building, and I just found it
00:56:09 Speaker 73: really valuable, and I just. as
00:56:12 Speaker 73: a thought, wondered at at some
00:56:13 Speaker 73: point, perhaps that training perhaps could
00:56:14 Speaker 73: come to County Council because we
00:56:16 Speaker 73: never know in our own lives
00:56:18 Speaker 73: when we might be in a
00:56:19 Speaker 73: circumstance like that. So I'll just
00:56:21 Speaker 73: leave that with you. Lavin is
00:56:23 Speaker 73: one of our managers in that
00:56:30 Speaker 73: health and wonderful resource. So yeah.
00:56:32 Speaker 73: Okay, Councillor Patterson. Thank you, Warden.
00:56:33 Speaker 97: Good morning, County Council, and thank
00:56:36 Speaker 97: you for the presentation. I wonder
00:56:38 Speaker 97: if you could speak to staffing,
00:56:39 Speaker 97: the complement, like how many staff
00:56:42 Speaker 97: are on site daily. I don't
00:56:43 Speaker 97: know why it keeps kicking off,
00:56:46 Speaker 97: but we have over sixty staff
00:56:48 Speaker 97: there. So we moved our mental
00:56:50 Speaker 97: health teams there as well. So
00:56:51 Speaker 97: we had the addiction programme, which
00:56:53 Speaker 98: I believe is about thirty-two staff,
00:56:56 Speaker 98: and numbers are not my strong
00:56:58 Speaker 98: point to remember, but I believe
00:56:59 Speaker 98: it's around thirty-two and sixty some.
00:57:01 Speaker 98: So. work there because we moved
00:57:03 Speaker 99: over some mental health teams. We're
00:57:05 Speaker 99: really we're trying to merge. In
00:57:07 Speaker 99: in historically, mental health and addictions
00:57:08 Speaker 99: were very separate, and we know
00:57:10 Speaker 99: I think we all know here
00:57:12 Speaker 100: intuitively they belong together. And so
00:57:15 Speaker 100: we were trying to do that
00:57:16 Speaker 100: by moving our mental health programmemes
00:57:17 Speaker 100: in, and as well, there's cost
00:57:19 Speaker 100: savings and really great synergies. Okay,
00:57:21 Speaker 101: and it's not you; it's only
00:57:23 Speaker 101: one mic. Be on it. Only
00:57:26 Speaker 101: one mic can be on at
00:57:27 Speaker 101: at one time, so so don't
00:57:29 Speaker 101: worry, we we've got it. Technology
00:57:31 Speaker 101: is trying to control us, but
00:57:33 Speaker 101: we're we're in control of the
00:57:35 Speaker 101: technology. Any other questions before we
00:57:37 Speaker 101: move on to the next part
00:57:39 Speaker 101: of the presentation? I do not
00:57:41 Speaker 101: see any further hands up. Good,
00:57:43 Speaker 101: so I think we're ready to
00:57:44 Speaker 101: progress. So I'm going to turn
00:57:46 Speaker 101: my mic off so that you
00:57:48 Speaker 101: can turn yours on. There we
00:57:52 Speaker 101: go. Good morning, everyone. I'm Anne
00:57:55 Speaker 101: for the president CEO of Brightshores.
00:57:56 Speaker 101: My apologies, I'm. moving a little
00:57:57 Speaker 101: bit slower today because I had
00:57:59 Speaker 101: the pleasure of meeting some of
00:58:03 Speaker 101: the Gray County paramedics about seven
00:58:05 Speaker 101: weeks ago when I broke both
00:58:09 Speaker 101: of my ankles at my home.
00:58:11 Speaker 101: It was fabulous. Anyway, I'm up
00:58:14 Speaker 101: and running and moving. But today
00:58:16 Speaker 101: is not about me. It's about
00:58:18 Speaker 101: you and and to thank you
00:58:21 Speaker 101: for everything that you've done for
00:58:23 Speaker 101: the Wellness Centre, but also just
00:58:25 Speaker 101: for Brightshore's Health System, the AMO.
00:58:27 Speaker 101: We were we were very happy
00:58:30 Speaker 101: to be asked to be providing
00:58:31 Speaker 101: some input into some of the
00:58:33 Speaker 101: documentation of Some of the documentation
00:58:35 Speaker 101: that went forward. I know you
00:58:37 Speaker 101: were all talking about healthcare at
00:58:39 Speaker 101: AMOS, so we really appreciate that
00:58:40 Speaker 101: advocacy because it's a frontline advocacy
00:58:42 Speaker 101: for all of us, and really
00:58:43 Speaker 101: solidifies what we're trying to bring
00:58:47 Speaker 101: forward to the provincial government as
00:58:49 Speaker 101: we try to move this forward.
00:58:52 Speaker 101: The other thing I'm here for
00:58:55 Speaker 101: today is to ask you for
00:58:56 Speaker 101: your participation in our next strategic
00:58:58 Speaker 101: plan. So we are in the
00:59:00 Speaker 101: process. We're in the very last
00:59:01 Speaker 101: year of our current strategic plan.
00:59:05 Speaker 101: So we're kicking off in October
00:59:07 Speaker 101: with engagement, both internal and external
00:59:11 Speaker 101: engagement, through the months of October
00:59:12 Speaker 101: and November, to speak to anyone
00:59:14 Speaker 101: and everyone we can across the
00:59:18 Speaker 101: region around their healthcare, what they
00:59:20 Speaker 101: think we're doing well, what we're
00:59:21 Speaker 101: not doing well, but actually then
00:59:22 Speaker 101: provide us with feedback. So one
00:59:23 Speaker 101: of the first groups we want
00:59:24 Speaker 101: to talk to is you, as
00:59:27 Speaker 101: you represent all of the residents
00:59:30 Speaker 101: and businesses within your communities, it
00:59:32 Speaker 101: would be great to get some
00:59:36 Speaker 101: feedback from you on what you're
00:59:37 Speaker 101: thinking and what's happening in your
00:59:39 Speaker 101: communities and where things are going.
00:59:41 Speaker 101: We know we are, you know,
00:59:42 Speaker 101: we've known this unfortunately for 20
00:59:44 Speaker 101: years, but we all know we're
00:59:46 Speaker 101: going to be living with an
00:59:48 Speaker 101: increased seniors population. That seniors population
00:59:50 Speaker 101: is going to drive needs, more
00:59:51 Speaker 102: needs for lots of community-based and
00:59:54 Speaker 103: social services and healthcare. We're already
00:59:57 Speaker 103: starting to see the impact of
00:59:58 Speaker 103: chronic disease, and it's not just
00:59:59 Speaker 103: one; it's multiples of chronic disease
01:00:00 Speaker 103: of folks coming into our ER
01:00:04 Speaker 103: and being admitted. So, having that
01:00:06 Speaker 103: really round view of what's happening
01:00:09 Speaker 103: within your communities, I heard long-term
01:00:12 Speaker 103: care mentioned. I know we're already,
01:00:14 Speaker 103: you know, working with Gray on
01:00:16 Speaker 103: on some other things. So, from
01:00:17 Speaker 103: your perspective, would be great. So,
01:00:19 Speaker 103: you also know though, as we
01:00:21 Speaker 103: go out to talk to the
01:00:23 Speaker 103: community, I know we're we're going
01:00:26 Speaker 103: to be in Owen Sound. There's
01:00:27 Speaker 103: a community event sometime where you're
01:00:29 Speaker 103: bringing in community social programmemes. We
01:00:31 Speaker 103: will be there, asking our our
01:00:33 Speaker 103: direct community some questions and just
01:00:35 Speaker 103: getting feedback. So if you have
01:00:37 Speaker 103: things happening within your communities, I
01:00:39 Speaker 103: know our communications department will be
01:00:41 Speaker 103: reaching out to everyone. We'd like
01:00:43 Speaker 103: to put up a table and
01:00:45 Speaker 103: just have some you know general
01:00:47 Speaker 103: conversations. There's no presentation per se.
01:00:49 Speaker 103: It's just asking folks what they
01:00:51 Speaker 103: think and where we're going. This
01:00:52 Speaker 103: will be a five year plan.
01:00:54 Speaker 103: This will be a five-year plan.
01:00:56 Speaker 103: So we are looking at the
01:00:58 Speaker 103: data. We're finding out what our
01:01:00 Speaker 103: patients are going to look like.
01:01:01 Speaker 103: We know the populations are going
01:01:02 Speaker 103: to be growing, and it's not
01:01:03 Speaker 103: just about our large, first centre
01:01:07 Speaker 103: here in Owen Sound. It's about
01:01:09 Speaker 103: the Markdale, about Meaford, and our
01:01:12 Speaker 103: other partner hospitals that are in
01:01:15 Speaker 103: Bruce County. How are we managing?
01:01:16 Speaker 103: How are we looking at that
01:01:17 Speaker 103: regional system to manage the stroke
01:01:18 Speaker 103: that comes in from Lionshead? and
01:01:19 Speaker 104: I know that that's Bruce County,
01:01:22 Speaker 104: but that comes in from Lionshead.
01:01:23 Speaker 104: And finally, I'll finish off with
01:01:25 Speaker 104: a shout out to Naomi and
01:01:27 Speaker 104: her team for mental health. The
01:01:29 Speaker 104: Addictions Wellness and Treatment Centre is
01:01:30 Speaker 103: one piece. You may know we
01:01:33 Speaker 103: also have a large component of
01:01:34 Speaker 103: inpatient beds, both geriatric and inpatient
01:01:35 Speaker 105: beds for mental health here at
01:01:38 Speaker 105: Owen Sound. We have some pediatric
01:01:39 Speaker 106: beds, not enough. We're advocating for
01:01:43 Speaker 106: a couple more pediatric beds because
01:01:44 Speaker 97: the only pediatric mental health beds
01:01:47 Speaker 97: other than he. Health beds, other
01:01:49 Speaker 97: than here in London, so you
01:01:50 Speaker 107: can imagine trying to get one
01:01:53 Speaker 107: a pediatric patient. So we're looking
01:01:54 Speaker 107: more at adolescent. We're working very
01:01:56 Speaker 107: closely with Keystone on their their
01:01:57 Speaker 107: children's mental health. But shout out
01:01:57 Speaker 107: to that. But also, I need
01:02:01 Speaker 107: I can't I'd be remiss if
01:02:02 Speaker 108: I don't shout out to all
01:02:05 Speaker 108: of our staff and physicians. The
01:02:06 Speaker 108: summer has been busy. We know
01:02:08 Speaker 108: our our seasonal folks come in,
01:02:09 Speaker 109: and we're getting ready for surge
01:02:12 Speaker 109: season. Hopefully, the flu is not
01:02:13 Speaker 109: too bad this year. So shout
01:02:16 Speaker 24: out to all of these folks.
01:02:19 Speaker 24: They all live in our communities.
01:02:20 Speaker 24: They do one hell of a
01:02:21 Speaker 24: job. It's amazing the dedication that
01:02:23 Speaker 24: they put into their roles. So
01:02:26 Speaker 24: I'll stop there. But really looking
01:02:28 Speaker 24: forward to talking to you more,
01:02:30 Speaker 24: both at this session and we
01:02:32 Speaker 24: will be reaching out individually to
01:02:34 Speaker 24: your offices to see if there's
01:02:35 Speaker 24: anything happening in your communities where
01:02:36 Speaker 24: we can just talk to folks.
01:02:37 Speaker 110: So thank you. I'm happy to
01:02:40 Speaker 110: take it. There's any questions? I
01:02:42 Speaker 110: know. Thank you very much. And
01:02:44 Speaker 110: so, are there any questions for
01:02:46 Speaker 110: either? CEO Ford or CEO McKinnon,
01:02:47 Speaker 110: as well with the presentation. We'll
01:02:49 Speaker 110: go to Councillor McQueen. Thank you,
01:02:50 Speaker 110: Madam Warden. Good morning, Anne. And
01:02:52 Speaker 111: I didn't recognize you coming in
01:02:55 Speaker 111: the door. I didn't think you
01:02:57 Speaker 111: were. I didn't know who was
01:02:58 Speaker 111: in the Walker. So I apologize
01:03:00 Speaker 111: for that. Yeah, I, I will
01:03:02 Speaker 111: say, like, just as a small
01:03:04 Speaker 112: part, we in Great Highlands had
01:03:07 Speaker 112: the Ram Roadier for the last
01:03:08 Speaker 112: five years, but also the presence
01:03:10 Speaker 112: presence of the hospital foundation, and
01:03:12 Speaker 112: it's. I think it has been
01:03:15 Speaker 112: quite useful to have that. ability
01:03:17 Speaker 112: for people to understand what that
01:03:18 Speaker 112: type of equipment is used for,
01:03:20 Speaker 112: or whatever, and that's what they
01:03:23 Speaker 112: were very good at. That I
01:03:25 Speaker 112: will say. The other part is
01:03:27 Speaker 112: from not to speak too much
01:03:28 Speaker 112: on it, but are all our
01:03:28 Speaker 112: gate receipts or profits went to
01:03:31 Speaker 112: the hospital foundation? And somebody would
01:03:32 Speaker 112: say, "Wow, it seems a little
01:03:34 Speaker 113: bit of expensive for the," and
01:03:36 Speaker 113: then it was said, "Well, it's
01:03:37 Speaker 113: all going to the hospital." Okay,
01:03:39 Speaker 114: so that part of fundraising and
01:03:48 Speaker 101: raising funds for the hospital is.
01:03:50 Speaker 101: that sweet spot that we all
01:03:51 Speaker 101: know we need, and it that
01:03:52 Speaker 101: just sort of pushes it over
01:03:54 Speaker 101: the top. So, it's it's a
01:03:57 Speaker 101: it's a balanced approach when when
01:03:59 Speaker 101: you're when you're raising funds. But
01:04:02 Speaker 101: everybody needs healthcare, and it just
01:04:03 Speaker 101: seems to be that I don't
01:04:05 Speaker 101: want to call it sacred cow,
01:04:07 Speaker 101: but it just everybody understands the
01:04:09 Speaker 101: need. And when it comes to
01:04:11 Speaker 101: fundraising and stuff like that, people
01:04:13 Speaker 101: give. And but it's also important
01:04:14 Speaker 101: on the education, and I will
01:04:16 Speaker 101: say on that part, having a
01:04:19 Speaker 101: table at those fund. Table at
01:04:20 Speaker 101: those fun those functions is an
01:04:22 Speaker 101: opportunity for yourselves and others to
01:04:24 Speaker 101: communicate what it's all about and
01:04:25 Speaker 101: why the funds are so important.
01:04:26 Speaker 101: For and I can't remember all
01:04:27 Speaker 101: the unique utensils they would have
01:04:28 Speaker 101: on that table, but they're pretty
01:04:30 Speaker 101: expensive, right? And and they have
01:04:32 Speaker 101: to be in it because they
01:04:33 Speaker 101: have to be top notch quality.
01:04:35 Speaker 101: But again, it just seemed to
01:04:37 Speaker 62: be that win win and that
01:04:46 Speaker 62: communication of just explaining that was
01:04:47 Speaker 62: was so beneficial in that part.
01:04:48 Speaker 62: So I think that's a good
01:04:49 Speaker 62: part to keep moving forward on.
01:04:51 Speaker 62: Thank you for that, because I
01:04:52 Speaker 115: know that the foundations, you know,
01:04:55 Speaker 116: Amy's here, known and sound, but
01:04:58 Speaker 116: we also have four other foundations
01:04:59 Speaker 116: at our other facilities that do
01:05:01 Speaker 117: raise money for us, and it's
01:05:05 Speaker 117: an incredible impact to what we
01:05:06 Speaker 117: are available to do. I think
01:05:08 Speaker 117: one of the things, you know,
01:05:09 Speaker 117: I'm here representing our hospitals. There's
01:05:10 Speaker 117: a whole community of healthcare that
01:05:12 Speaker 118: happens outside the hospital. and you
01:05:15 Speaker 119: know, even as we look at
01:05:17 Speaker 119: the strategy, how are we starting
01:05:18 Speaker 119: to? We already partner, but how
01:05:20 Speaker 119: are we starting to look more
01:05:21 Speaker 119: towards our community partners to help
01:05:22 Speaker 119: us keep patients out of the
01:05:23 Speaker 119: hospital? No one wants to be
01:05:25 Speaker 119: in a hospital. No one. I
01:05:29 Speaker 119: mean, it's it's one of those
01:05:30 Speaker 119: things. It's not like you're going
01:05:31 Speaker 119: to a hotel and having a
01:05:33 Speaker 119: good time. No one wants to
01:05:34 Speaker 101: be there. We are a necessity,
01:05:37 Speaker 101: but what do we need to
01:05:42 Speaker 101: do in the future to help
01:05:44 Speaker 101: people stay healthy so they're out
01:05:46 Speaker 101: of our hospitals? They'll always be.
01:05:47 Speaker 101: needed. Oh, I gotta shut my.
01:05:51 Speaker 101: Just to follow up to that,
01:05:52 Speaker 101: Madam Ward, and I just—I know
01:05:54 Speaker 101: if people have been listening to
01:05:55 Speaker 101: the radio last couple days, but
01:05:58 Speaker 101: there's been a new ad programme
01:05:59 Speaker 101: out talking about prevention and a
01:06:00 Speaker 101: new type of getting testing and
01:06:02 Speaker 101: stuff like that. Is that relatively
01:06:04 Speaker 101: new? Has anybody heard it recently?
01:06:06 Speaker 101: It's talking about early screening and
01:06:08 Speaker 101: and and there's like five. And
01:06:15 Speaker 38: and there's like 500 things that
01:06:18 Speaker 120: you can get checked out that
01:06:21 Speaker 120: about cancer and that kind of
01:06:24 Speaker 120: stuff. It just it's a whole
01:06:25 Speaker 120: new campaign that's that's out there.
01:06:27 Speaker 120: I found it's quite it's preventive
01:06:29 Speaker 120: preventiveness or early part of detect
01:06:30 Speaker 120: detection. And I just wonder if
01:06:31 Speaker 120: that's a new campaign from the
01:06:33 Speaker 120: Ministry of Health. But I just
01:06:34 Speaker 121: I've noticed that in this past
01:06:38 Speaker 121: week there seems to be some
01:06:39 Speaker 121: ads, which makes sense. I don't
01:06:41 Speaker 121: know if you have any comment
01:06:42 Speaker 121: to that. There is going to
01:06:44 Speaker 121: be more of a push on
01:06:45 Speaker 121: prevention and screening. So I think
01:06:46 Speaker 121: everyone knows you know there's already
01:06:48 Speaker 121: screening. for colon cancer, and there's
01:06:49 Speaker 121: breast screening, and the Ontario breast
01:06:51 Speaker 121: screening guidelines now have reduced the
01:15:47 Speaker 20: age down to 40 for women
01:15:50 Speaker 20: to to actually come in for
01:15:52 Speaker 20: mammograms, which is fantastic.
01:16:55 Speaker 20: The cancer
01:17:26 Speaker 20: rates in younger people are growing
01:17:28 Speaker 20: for certain things like colon cancer
01:17:30 Speaker 20: in younger, and we're talking people
01:17:31 Speaker 20: in their 30s and 40s. So
01:17:33 Speaker 20: there's another push on that, but
01:17:35 Speaker 20: there there is going to be
01:17:37 Speaker 20: more of a push from the
01:17:39 Speaker 20: ministry and through our OH. And
01:17:40 Speaker 20: through our OHTs around prevention, and
01:17:43 Speaker 20: how might you be able to
01:17:46 Speaker 20: to get some some of the
01:17:48 Speaker 20: tests, etc., to the community? Okay,
01:17:50 Speaker 20: thank you. Any other questions, Madam
01:17:52 Speaker 20: Clerk? Anything online? I don't have
01:17:53 Speaker 20: my screen. There we go. Okay,
01:17:55 Speaker 20: great. Well, that looks like that's
01:17:57 Speaker 20: the conclusion of the questions. We
01:18:00 Speaker 20: appreciate all three of you coming
01:18:01 Speaker 20: today and providing the update, and
01:18:04 Speaker 20: certainly that. And certainly, there are
01:18:06 Speaker 20: lots of good news in what
01:18:07 Speaker 20: you're able to share with us
01:18:08 Speaker 20: this morning. Thank you very much.
01:18:12 Speaker 20: Okay, thank you. So, at this
01:18:13 Speaker 20: point in time, the clerks have
01:18:17 Speaker 20: requested we take a brief break
01:18:18 Speaker 20: between our delegations. So, what we'll
01:18:21 Speaker 20: do is we'll take our our
01:18:23 Speaker 122: mid morning break at this point
01:18:26 Speaker 122: in time, and if we could
01:18:27 Speaker 122: come back, let's try to make
01:18:29 Speaker 122: it back by eleven ten, and
01:18:31 Speaker 122: we'll carry on from there. Thank
01:18:33 Speaker 122: you very much. I'll just encourage
01:18:35 Speaker 122: our county council members to start
01:18:37 Speaker 122: coming back forward to their positions.
01:18:39 Speaker 122: Thank you. Okay, so. looks like
01:18:41 Speaker 122: we have our quorum back here.
01:18:45 Speaker 122: Now I can announce that we
01:18:47 Speaker 122: are actually not going to be
01:18:49 Speaker 122: entertaining item 4B. That delegation has
01:18:50 Speaker 122: been postponed to a future meeting,
01:18:54 Speaker 122: so we'll bring them back at
01:18:55 Speaker 122: another time. That allows us to
5 Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion
A speaker moved to item 5.
01:18:56 Speaker 122: move to item 5, which is
01:18:58 Speaker 122: our determination of of items requiring
01:19:00 Speaker 122: separate discussion. There are five
01:19:02 Speaker 122: different items under the consent agenda
01:19:06 Speaker 122: this this today. So I'm going
01:19:07 Speaker 122: to ask for the items that
01:19:08 Speaker 122: wish to be pulled, and then
01:19:09 Speaker 122: we'll move the motion to look.
01:19:11 Speaker 122: after the rest of them. Anything
01:19:13 Speaker 122: through items six A through six
01:19:15 Speaker 122: E that any member wishes to
01:19:17 Speaker 122: pull for a separate discussion.
01:19:20 Speaker 122: Councillor Greg. Thank you for
6.b PDR-CW-53-25 Paul H. Martin Minor Exemption
A motion to receive consent agenda items without item six B was moved by the deputy ordnance and seconded by Councillor Dicker. The motion was carried, authorising staff to take necessary actions and supporting correspondence for information. Council agreed to revisit item six B at the end of the agenda before proceeding to Section Seven.
01:19:22 Speaker 122: the opportunity. I have six B
01:19:25 Speaker 122: that I do have a question
01:19:27 Speaker 122: related to, so I'd like to
01:19:31 Speaker 123: pull it, please. Okay, so that's
01:19:34 Speaker 123: six B. Any others? Okay, not
01:19:36 Speaker 123: seeing any hands online or
01:19:38 Speaker 02: here around the horseshoe. So with
01:19:41 Speaker 02: without six B, it is recommended
01:19:43 Speaker 02: that the following consent agenda items.
01:19:45 Speaker 02: be received, and that staff be
01:19:47 Speaker 02: authorised to take actions necessary to
01:19:49 Speaker 02: give effect to the recommendations in
01:19:51 Speaker 02: the staff reports, and that the
01:19:56 Speaker 124: correspondence be supported or received for
01:19:58 Speaker 124: information as recommended in the consent
01:19:59 Speaker 124: agenda. May ask for a mover
01:20:01 Speaker 124: and a seconder. Moved by the
01:20:02 Speaker 124: deputy ordnance, seconded by Councillor Dicker.
01:20:05 Speaker 124: And any discussion. All those in
01:20:08 Speaker 124: favour. That motion is carried, and
01:20:09 Speaker 124: we will revisit item six B
01:20:11 Speaker 124: at the end of our agenda.
01:20:13 Speaker 124: Okay, so now we'll go on
01:20:14 Speaker 124: to the items that are scheduled
01:20:16 Speaker 124: for discussion. That is Section Seven.
01:20:18 Speaker 124: The first one that we have
7.a Planning and Economic Development Advisory Committee meeting minutes dated August 7, 2025
The Committee received a report on Economic Development, Tourism and Culture Strategic Progress for information and endorsed the minutes from August 7, 2025. A speaker reported that business enterprise staff handled 144 inquiries between April and June, supported businesses to sustain, expand, or purchase, hosted eight workshops with 173 participants, and operated the Bob McDowell Memorial Railway at Gray Roots. The village operations restructuring introduced guided tours, daily historic demonstrations, and reduced volunteer shifts to improve experiences for volunteers, students, and visitors.
01:20:20 Speaker 124: is Item Seven A: Planning and
01:20:21 Speaker 124: Economic Development Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes.
01:20:24 Speaker 124: And Director Myers, do you'd like
01:20:26 Speaker 124: to speak to that? Let me
01:20:27 Speaker 124: get the motion on the floor
01:20:29 Speaker 124: for you, and then offer you
01:20:31 Speaker 124: the lectern to speak. So, with
01:20:33 Speaker 124: that, then it's recommended that the
01:20:35 Speaker 124: county of the county of planning
01:20:36 Speaker 124: and that the county planning and
01:20:38 Speaker 124: economic development advisory committee meeting minutes
01:20:41 Speaker 124: dated August seventh, twenty twenty five,
01:20:42 Speaker 124: be adopted as presented, and the
01:20:44 Speaker 124: following resolutions contained therein be endorsed.
01:20:46 Speaker 124: That report E D T C
01:20:47 Speaker 124: P E D A C zero
01:20:49 Speaker 124: eight twenty five regarding Economic Development
01:20:51 Speaker 124: Tourism and Culture Strategic Progress Report
01:20:52 Speaker 124: August twenty twenty five be received
01:20:54 Speaker 124: for information. May I ask for
01:20:55 Speaker 124: a mover and a seconder? I've
01:20:58 Speaker 124: got it moved by Councillor Hutchinson,
01:21:00 Speaker 124: seconded by Councillor. Nielsen, it's on
01:21:01 Speaker 124: the floor for discussion. Welcome, Director
01:21:04 Speaker 124: Myers. Thank you very much. And
01:21:05 Speaker 124: through you, Orton, we had an
01:21:07 Speaker 124: excellent PDAC meeting. There's a lot
01:21:07 Speaker 124: of energy in our PDAC meetings,
01:21:09 Speaker 124: so thank you to Chair Kibney,
01:21:11 Speaker 124: who runs those so smoothly. We
01:21:14 Speaker 124: started the day off with a
01:21:15 Speaker 124: delegation from Amanda Meja from Henry
01:21:16 Speaker 124: Bernard Entrepreneurship Centre. So, as you
01:21:18 Speaker 124: remember from last year, this was
01:21:21 Speaker 124: a pilot programme and partnership that
01:21:22 Speaker 124: Gray County entered into. to bring
01:21:25 Speaker 124: that service to this region. We've
01:21:26 Speaker 124: always had to rely on it
01:21:27 Speaker 124: through Barry, but we wanted to
01:21:30 Speaker 124: see what potential there was here,
01:21:31 Speaker 124: what relationships we could make, and
01:21:33 Speaker 124: what impact it might have by
01:21:35 Speaker 124: bringing it here to Sidney Campus.
01:21:37 Speaker 124: And it was a really successful
01:21:38 Speaker 124: pilot. They supported 20 businesses who
01:21:40 Speaker 124: are not in the startup phase,
01:21:43 Speaker 124: but in the actual growth stages
01:21:44 Speaker 124: with things like IP, so intellectual
01:21:45 Speaker 124: property. That is an area we
01:21:47 Speaker 124: do not get into as staff
01:21:49 Speaker 124: at the county. That's not an
01:21:50 Speaker 124: expertise of our That's not an
01:21:52 Speaker 124: expertise of ours. We were able
01:21:52 Speaker 124: to tap into their mentors who
01:21:54 Speaker 124: are through their Barry network. So
01:21:56 Speaker 124: instead of having to just rely
01:21:59 Speaker 124: on local mentors, that we're able
01:22:00 Speaker 124: to create, we now have a
01:22:01 Speaker 124: wider net cast. We also have
01:22:04 Speaker 124: excellent partnership with the staff at
01:22:06 Speaker 124: Henry Burnick, and now with Amanda's
01:22:08 Speaker 124: departure, she is on the other
01:22:10 Speaker 124: side of the world, I believe,
01:22:11 Speaker 124: doing her master's now, which is
01:22:13 Speaker 124: hard to step in the way
01:22:14 Speaker 124: of that. But we now have
01:22:15 Speaker 124: Ryan Burrell, who will be our
01:22:16 Speaker 124: contact for this area, focused on
01:22:19 Speaker 124: Gray and Bruce and. continuing this
01:22:20 Speaker 124: good work, so we're really happy
01:22:22 Speaker 124: with the partnership that we had,
01:22:22 Speaker 124: and lots of excitement. There's a
01:22:24 Speaker 124: large PowerPoint presentation that you can
01:22:25 Speaker 124: look at from the PDAC committee
01:22:28 Speaker 124: that will take you through all
01:22:30 Speaker 124: of the wins that we saw
01:22:32 Speaker 124: across that first year. So that
01:22:34 Speaker 124: was the first part of our
01:22:35 Speaker 124: committee. The second, we went into
01:22:37 Speaker 124: our strategic progress report for August,
01:22:38 Speaker 124: which is really hard to believe.
01:22:39 Speaker 124: Then now we're in September, and
01:22:41 Speaker 124: time is really flying. But a
01:22:43 Speaker 124: couple of key points to highlight
01:22:44 Speaker 124: from that. report, and the first
01:22:45 Speaker 124: was the lean training that our
01:22:47 Speaker 124: economic development, tourism, and culture team
01:22:49 Speaker 124: is going through. So we piloted
01:22:51 Speaker 124: a lean training last year with
01:22:52 Speaker 124: our village at Gray Roots, and
01:22:54 Speaker 124: I'm going to talk to you
01:22:56 Speaker 124: about some of the the successes
01:22:57 Speaker 124: through that. But this was really
01:23:00 Speaker 124: looking at ourselves. So our master
01:23:01 Speaker 124: plan tells us what we need
01:23:03 Speaker 124: to do to best serve our
01:23:06 Speaker 124: clients, our municipalities, our businesses. The
01:23:08 Speaker 124: lean training is for us as
01:23:09 Speaker 124: a team to make sure that
01:23:11 Speaker 124: we are resourced, we are structured,
01:23:12 Speaker 124: and we are functioning the way
01:23:14 Speaker 124: that we can. be most efficient,
01:23:16 Speaker 124: so we're not trying to do
01:23:18 Speaker 124: more with less. We're trying to
01:23:20 Speaker 124: do what we need to do
01:23:22 Speaker 124: in a good way that keeps
01:23:24 Speaker 124: everybody happy. So that is ongoing,
01:23:27 Speaker 124: and we're excited to continue that
01:23:28 Speaker 124: on through the rest of the
01:23:31 Speaker 124: year and be back to you
01:23:32 Speaker 124: with a an update on how
01:23:33 Speaker 124: that has gone by November. We
01:23:36 Speaker 124: are also working on the memory
01:23:37 Speaker 124: and understanding for Team Gray. So
01:23:41 Speaker 124: that is a project that is
01:23:43 Speaker 124: under my portfolio. So I'm working
01:23:47 Speaker 124: with every one of your CAOs
01:23:49 Speaker 124: right now. They have all been
01:23:51 Speaker 124: very generous with their time. We've
01:23:54 Speaker 124: had two discussions at this. point,
01:23:57 Speaker 124: so they will be getting a
01:23:58 Speaker 124: draft soon, and we'll talk
01:24:00 Speaker 124: about this at the next leadership
01:24:02 Speaker 124: forum on October 30th of what
01:24:04 Speaker 124: this MOU looks like, and it
01:24:06 Speaker 124: really is about laying out the
01:24:07 Speaker 124: roles and responsibilities between our member
01:24:08 Speaker 124: municipality and the county when it
01:24:10 Speaker 124: comes to economic development and investment
01:24:12 Speaker 124: readiness. So how we can work
01:24:13 Speaker 124: best together in a cohesive manner.
01:24:15 Speaker 124: We celebrated the launch of our
01:24:16 Speaker 124: newest gather video, which was featuring
01:24:18 Speaker 124: downtown Owen Sound businesses, and really
01:24:21 Speaker 124: taking a moment to celebrate all
01:24:23 Speaker 124: of the good people. and all
01:24:25 Speaker 124: of the good business we have
01:24:27 Speaker 124: in downtown Owen Sound. So, if
01:24:29 Speaker 124: you haven't seen it already, I
01:24:30 Speaker 124: do encourage you to take a
01:24:32 Speaker 124: look at that because it really
01:24:34 Speaker 124: has been a great opportunity to
01:24:36 Speaker 125: tell a different story and to
01:24:39 Speaker 125: recognize all of the good that
01:24:41 Speaker 125: we have across our communities. Business
01:24:43 Speaker 125: Enterprise Centre. I did want to
01:24:45 Speaker 125: highlight this. So, as Randy had
01:24:47 Speaker 125: mentioned before, this was one of
01:24:49 Speaker 125: the delegations for AMO. But just
01:24:50 Speaker 125: to give you an idea, from
01:24:52 Speaker 126: April to June, so in that
01:24:54 Speaker 126: three-month period. the business enterprise staff
01:24:56 Speaker 126: handled 144 inquiries. They had 33
01:24:57 Speaker 126: one-on-one consultations. They supported 10 businesses
01:24:59 Speaker 126: to sustain, seven businesses to expand,
01:25:01 Speaker 126: and five businesses to be purchased
01:25:03 Speaker 126: in that three-month period. So the
01:25:04 Speaker 126: services are very, very valuable. There
01:25:06 Speaker 126: is no shortage to knock on
01:25:08 Speaker 126: their door. And what's really interesting,
01:25:11 Speaker 126: most business enterprise centres, you have
01:25:13 Speaker 126: the option to be in person
01:25:15 Speaker 126: or virtual. In Gray County, 70%
01:25:16 Speaker 126: of our clients. Seventy percent of
01:25:18 Speaker 126: our clients choose to come in
01:25:19 Speaker 126: person, so they will drive across
01:25:21 Speaker 126: the county to come to Sydney
01:25:23 Speaker 126: to sit down and have that
01:25:25 Speaker 126: consultation with the Enterprise Centre. And
01:25:27 Speaker 126: I think that's really important. It's
01:25:29 Speaker 126: just it bodes well to the
01:25:30 Speaker 126: relationships they've built in this region
01:25:31 Speaker 126: and the impact that they're having.
01:25:33 Speaker 126: They also did an intensive series,
01:25:36 Speaker 126: and between eight workshops, had one
01:25:37 Speaker 126: hundred and seventy three participants come
01:25:39 Speaker 126: through those eight workshops, and those
01:25:41 Speaker 126: were intensives taking care of the
01:25:42 Speaker 126: person behind the business and the
01:25:44 Speaker 126: things that we hear as the
01:25:45 Speaker 126: great. Here as the greatest barriers
01:25:47 Speaker 126: and the greatest threats to businesses
01:25:48 Speaker 126: today. With Sydney Campus, we also
01:25:50 Speaker 126: celebrated our doors. So if you
01:25:52 Speaker 126: haven't been to Sydney lately, we
01:25:53 Speaker 126: have new exterior doors that actually
01:25:55 Speaker 126: lock and close, which is amazing.
01:25:57 Speaker 126: They look excellent, and it's really
01:25:59 Speaker 126: brought a whole new look and
01:26:00 Speaker 126: feel to the hallways because we
01:26:02 Speaker 126: went full floor-to-ceiling glass. So it
01:26:04 Speaker 126: just opened the space up and
01:26:05 Speaker 126: brought a lot of natural light.
01:26:07 Speaker 126: So anytime you wish to celebrate
01:26:09 Speaker 126: those doors at Sydney, please go
01:26:11 Speaker 126: ahead because every time we walk
01:26:12 Speaker 126: down the hall, we get excited.
01:26:13 Speaker 126: I'll talk in just a second
01:26:15 Speaker 126: about our regional marketing and summer
01:26:17 Speaker 126: students, but Great Roots we have
01:26:19 Speaker 126: had a banner year at Great
01:26:20 Speaker 126: Roots. We knew Dinosaurs was going
01:26:21 Speaker 126: to be big, but I think
01:26:22 Speaker 126: what gets all of our staff
01:26:26 Speaker 126: most excited is that when we
01:26:29 Speaker 126: see visitors coming in, whether they're
01:26:30 Speaker 126: residents or they're coming to the
01:26:33 Speaker 126: area, they're lured in by dinosaurs
01:26:36 Speaker 126: or whatever our travelling exhibit is.
01:26:38 Speaker 126: But when they leave, they tell
01:26:40 Speaker 126: us their favourite parts are our
01:26:41 Speaker 126: Great County Gallery. Are our Gray
01:26:43 Speaker 126: County Gallery and Morrison Heritage Village.
01:26:45 Speaker 126: So it's the things that we
01:26:47 Speaker 126: do every day, year-round. That's what
01:26:48 Speaker 126: they love the most, and that
01:26:51 Speaker 126: I think is really important to
01:26:53 Speaker 126: recognize the good work that staff
01:26:54 Speaker 126: have done, the fact that they
01:26:56 Speaker 126: are delivering what people are looking
01:26:58 Speaker 126: for, and we're helping tell the
01:27:00 Speaker 126: story of Gray County. So that's
01:27:03 Speaker 126: just a note that we wanted
01:27:04 Speaker 126: to make. And as I mentioned,
01:27:06 Speaker 126: with our lean projects, we've done
01:27:08 Speaker 126: a couple of really cool interactive
01:27:09 Speaker 126: experiences this year. So the first,
01:27:11 Speaker 126: the Bob McDowell Memorial Railway is
01:27:12 Speaker 126: up and running. So you can
01:27:14 Speaker 126: now come and get railroad rides.
01:27:17 Speaker 126: It's not an everyday thing; it's
01:27:20 Speaker 126: a special occurrence. But this is
01:27:21 Speaker 126: something that we now offer at
01:27:22 Speaker 126: Gray Roots, which has been phenomenal.
01:27:25 Speaker 126: We had two hundred and fifty
01:27:28 Speaker 126: riders in the first event, another
01:27:30 Speaker 126: hundred in the following, and I
01:27:33 Speaker 126: think the last one was about
01:27:35 Speaker 126: one seventy-five. So when you see
01:27:38 Speaker 126: photos of it, it holds two
01:27:41 Speaker 126: little cars, basically an adult and
01:27:42 Speaker 126: two kids. So you can imagine
01:27:46 Speaker 126: how many rides is going around
01:27:48 Speaker 126: to get that many people on
01:27:49 Speaker 126: that train. But the village lean
01:27:51 Speaker 126: assessment really. demonstrated what we can
01:27:53 Speaker 126: do when we look at things
01:27:55 Speaker 126: differently. So we took the opportunity
01:27:57 Speaker 126: in 2024 to look at where
01:27:58 Speaker 126: the village operations were, what we
01:28:01 Speaker 126: could do with the volunteers and
01:28:02 Speaker 126: the staffing that we had, and
01:28:03 Speaker 126: really rethink what it was going
01:28:06 Speaker 126: to look like. And it was
01:28:09 Speaker 126: all new this year. So we
01:28:11 Speaker 126: now have guided village tours. We
01:28:13 Speaker 126: have historic demonstrations every day. We
01:28:14 Speaker 126: were still open seven days a
01:28:16 Speaker 126: week, still the same hours, and
01:28:18 Speaker 126: then we reduced our long. And
01:28:19 Speaker 126: then we reduced our volunteer shifts
01:28:21 Speaker 126: from two to one, so that
01:28:22 Speaker 126: way we weren't trying to constantly
01:28:24 Speaker 126: look and look and not be
01:28:27 Speaker 126: able to open buildings. So it
01:28:28 Speaker 126: was a better experience for volunteers,
01:28:30 Speaker 126: a better experience for our students,
01:28:32 Speaker 126: and a better experience for our
01:28:34 Speaker 126: visitors because everybody got to find
01:28:36 Speaker 126: something that they're passionate about and
01:28:38 Speaker 126: get involved in. And the numbers
01:28:40 Speaker 126: speak for themselves. So in the
01:28:41 Speaker 126: first four weeks of Morriston, and
01:28:42 Speaker 126: we'll have better numbers by the
01:28:44 Speaker 127: end of the summer, we had
01:28:49 Speaker 127: 85 demonstrators. We had 85 demonstrations,
01:28:50 Speaker 127: and 2,407 people came to participate
01:28:52 Speaker 128: in those. 51% of those observers
01:28:54 Speaker 129: actually got hands-on engaged with the
01:28:58 Speaker 129: demonstrations that were happening. Our students
01:28:59 Speaker 129: offered 42 personalized tours, and they
01:29:01 Speaker 129: hosted 197 participants in those first
01:29:02 Speaker 130: four weeks, including one tour fully
01:29:05 Speaker 130: in French. With the volunteer shifts,
01:29:06 Speaker 130: our buildings were filled, and all
01:29:08 Speaker 130: buildings have been open daily 92%
01:29:09 Speaker 130: of the time. So these are
01:29:12 Speaker 130: numbers we just haven't seen in
01:29:14 Speaker 130: here. Seen in Heritage Village, and
01:29:15 Speaker 130: I think it speaks a
01:29:17 Speaker 130: lot to everybody coming together to
01:29:20 Speaker 130: find a new way forward, which
01:29:21 Speaker 130: was phenomenal. And we're going to
01:29:22 Speaker 130: continue that next year. So they
01:29:24 Speaker 130: started debriefing yesterday, and the volunteer
01:29:25 Speaker 130: meeting's coming up next month. Last,
01:29:27 Speaker 130: but certainly certainly not least, we
01:29:30 Speaker 130: talked about roundtable sector trends and
01:29:37 Speaker 130: challenges. So downtown was a key
01:29:38 Speaker 130: component of that conversation, tying back
01:29:40 Speaker 130: to our own Sound Gather video.
01:29:43 Speaker 130: But we also talked about the
01:29:45 Speaker 130: mentality of we and the fact
01:29:46 Speaker 130: that in Gray County, we
01:29:48 Speaker 130: really. are a we can we
01:29:50 Speaker 130: do things together. It's not I.
01:29:54 Speaker 130: We're not competing with one another.
01:29:56 Speaker 130: We really are coming to the
01:29:59 Speaker 130: table as a collective and saying
01:30:01 Speaker 130: we can do things beyond what
01:30:04 Speaker 130: we think we can do. So
01:30:07 Speaker 130: that was a real conversation that
01:30:08 Speaker 130: we're proud of, something that we
01:30:09 Speaker 130: want to maintain and continue. But
01:30:10 Speaker 130: it was a great way to
01:30:11 Speaker 130: end the PDAC meeting. So any
01:30:13 Speaker 130: questions? Please let me know. Great,
01:30:15 Speaker 130: thank you. So we'll put it
01:30:17 Speaker 131: out there if there are. any
01:30:21 Speaker 131: members that have any questions for
01:30:23 Speaker 131: Director Myers or comments, indeed, there
01:30:24 Speaker 131: is a lot of energy in
01:30:26 Speaker 131: the room when everyone comes together
01:30:27 Speaker 131: like that, and they're able to
01:30:29 Speaker 131: share what's going on across our
01:30:30 Speaker 131: our county. Thank you. Well, with
01:30:32 Speaker 132: that, then I see no further
01:30:34 Speaker 132: questions on this matter. I'll call
01:30:36 Speaker 132: the question. All those in favour,
01:30:37 Speaker 132: and that motion is carried. Thank
01:30:40 Speaker 132: you. Okay. So next, we're going
7.b Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting minutes dated September 3, 2025
Council adopted the Agricultural Advisory Committee minutes dated September 3, 2025, and endorsed resolutions to receive a report on nuisance animal bylaw reviews and consider feedback regarding beaver, coyote, and wolf bylaws. A speaker noted that staff would explore education on non-lethal control methods and collaborate with farmers and trappers, acknowledging that trapping is a last resort due to insufficient compensation for equipment and mileage costs. Staff indicated that nuisance animals persist despite existing bylaws and bounties, suggesting further research is needed to develop balanced recommendations for council regarding guardian dogs and dam removal restrictions.
01:30:42 Speaker 132: to go to the Agricultural Advisory
01:30:44 Speaker 132: Committee meeting minutes of September third,
01:30:46 Speaker 132: and Director Taylor is going to
01:30:48 Speaker 132: speak to that now. I just
01:30:50 Speaker 132: want to caution everyone: lunch is
01:30:52 Speaker 132: not until noon, so he is
01:30:53 Speaker 132: not speaking just before lunch. We
01:30:55 Speaker 132: will have a little bit more
01:30:57 Speaker 132: business after that. Oh, and let
01:31:00 Speaker 132: me just get the motion on
01:31:01 Speaker 132: the floor for you, Director Taylor.
01:31:05 Speaker 132: So, it's recommended that the Agricultural
01:31:07 Speaker 132: Advisory Committee meeting minutes, dated September
01:31:08 Speaker 132: third, twenty twenty-five, be adopted as
01:31:11 Speaker 132: presented, and the following resolutions contain.
01:31:12 Speaker 132: The following resolutions contained therein be
01:31:14 Speaker 132: endorsed: Number one, that report PDRAAC
01:31:15 Speaker 132: fifty six twenty five is received,
01:31:17 Speaker 132: and number two, that staff consider
01:31:20 Speaker 132: any further feedback received from the
01:31:22 Speaker 132: Agricultural Advisory Committee with respect to
01:31:23 Speaker 132: the county's nuisance beaver and coyote
01:31:25 Speaker 132: slash wolf bylaw reviews. And I
01:31:27 Speaker 132: know that Director Taylor will be
01:31:29 Speaker 132: speaking to that, so I'll look
01:31:30 Speaker 132: for a mover and a seconder
01:31:33 Speaker 132: to get it on the floor.
01:31:34 Speaker 132: Move by Councillor Dobrin, seconded by
01:31:36 Speaker 132: Councillor Eccles. It's now on the
01:31:39 Speaker 132: floor for discussion. Welcome, Director Taylor.
01:31:42 Speaker 132: Great, thanks, Madam Warden and members
01:31:43 Speaker 132: of council. There was a lot
01:31:46 Speaker 132: of excitement at the Agricultural Advisory
01:31:49 Speaker 132: Committee meeting too. I'll probably just
01:31:52 Speaker 132: present it in a slightly more
01:31:54 Speaker 132: monotone tone than Savannah did, but
01:31:56 Speaker 132: I'll do my best here to
01:31:58 Speaker 132: to bring the excitement from the
01:32:00 Speaker 132: room. the The first matter on
01:32:01 Speaker 132: the agenda was a report by
01:32:03 Speaker 132: Sarah Johnson, the county's trails and
01:32:05 Speaker 132: forestry coordinator, with respect to, as
01:32:07 Speaker 132: the Warden mentioned, the the updates
01:32:10 Speaker 132: on on the the review of
01:32:13 Speaker 132: the beaver and coyote wolf. bylaws,
01:32:16 Speaker 133: so as council may recall, we
01:32:19 Speaker 133: did have an open house at
01:32:20 Speaker 133: Greater Cultural Services in late April
01:32:22 Speaker 133: on this topic, and we also
01:32:23 Speaker 133: had a public meeting in these
01:32:25 Speaker 133: council chambers and in a hybrid
01:32:27 Speaker 132: fashion in in early May with
01:32:30 Speaker 132: respect to the bylaws. A number
01:32:32 Speaker 132: of of members of County Council
01:32:34 Speaker 132: were able to attend that that
01:32:36 Speaker 132: public meeting, and we just wanted
01:32:39 Speaker 132: to provide a further update to
01:32:41 Speaker 132: both council and and the Agricultural
01:32:43 Speaker 132: Advisory Committee with respect to the
01:32:46 Speaker 132: feedback we heard. Not only at
01:32:48 Speaker 132: that meeting but also in written
01:32:50 Speaker 132: form after the fact, I think
01:32:53 Speaker 132: if you attended the the public
01:32:55 Speaker 132: meeting, a lot of the comments
01:32:58 Speaker 132: were relatively well one sided. We
01:33:01 Speaker 132: heard a lot of really good
01:33:03 Speaker 132: comments from from people in the
01:33:05 Speaker 132: trapping community and people in the
01:33:06 Speaker 132: farm community. We heard comments about
01:33:08 Speaker 132: streamlining some of the processes under
01:33:10 Speaker 132: the bylaw to to under the
01:33:12 Speaker 132: bylaws plural, whether the beaver or
01:33:14 Speaker 132: the coyote, to make claims. We
01:33:16 Speaker 132: heard comments about licenced trappers and
01:33:18 Speaker 132: and their ability to control. populations
01:33:19 Speaker 132: in a humane way, which reduces
01:33:21 Speaker 132: the potential for starvation or disease.
01:33:23 Speaker 132: We heard topics about the population
01:33:26 Speaker 132: of both coyotes and beavers across
01:33:27 Speaker 132: the county, and anecdotally, those numbers
01:33:30 Speaker 132: remain at very high levels. Certainly,
01:33:32 Speaker 132: from the farm community, we heard
01:33:35 Speaker 132: that landowners need to be able
01:33:37 Speaker 132: to protect their property and livestock,
01:33:41 Speaker 132: and to a lesser extent, we
01:33:43 Speaker 132: also heard that with respect to
01:33:46 Speaker 132: flooding impacts related to beaver dams,
01:33:49 Speaker 132: we did hear about the impact.
01:33:51 Speaker 132: on on both infrastructure from flooding
01:33:53 Speaker 132: and and farmlands. We heard about
01:33:56 Speaker 132: the financial and mental mental health
01:33:58 Speaker 132: toll it takes on farmers when
01:33:59 Speaker 132: there is a livestock attack or
01:34:01 Speaker 132: kill in that regard, and and
01:34:04 Speaker 132: that's not to be underestimated. In
01:34:06 Speaker 132: in the public meeting, there was
01:34:07 Speaker 132: some some very from the heart
01:34:10 Speaker 132: comments that that came on that
01:34:12 Speaker 132: mental health impact, which was which
01:34:13 Speaker 132: was really interesting. We heard about
01:34:16 Speaker 132: the need for refinements to the
01:34:17 Speaker 132: programmemes and particular. To the programmemes,
01:34:20 Speaker 132: and particularly on on the coyote
01:34:21 Speaker 132: and wolf side, when there's been
01:34:23 Speaker 132: a kill and and there's no
01:34:26 Speaker 132: remains of the livestock and and
01:34:28 Speaker 132: the ability to still potentially present
01:34:30 Speaker 132: a claim if if there's no
01:34:34 Speaker 134: remains to be verified, and then
01:34:36 Speaker 134: we also heard some comments with
01:34:38 Speaker 134: respect to considerations for municipalities to
01:34:39 Speaker 132: update their own municipal bylaws regarding
01:34:43 Speaker 132: guardian dogs and hunting animals, and
01:34:44 Speaker 132: so then after the public meeting,
01:34:45 Speaker 132: we still had a significant
01:34:47 Speaker 132: comment period where people. could could
01:34:49 Speaker 132: submit comments in writing, and Sarah
01:34:51 Speaker 132: also received some phone calls on
01:34:52 Speaker 132: this. And and and there were
01:34:54 Speaker 132: some counterpoints to some of the
01:34:55 Speaker 132: the comments we heard at the
01:34:58 Speaker 132: public meetings. In fact, from some
01:35:00 Speaker 132: people we heard that when there
01:35:02 Speaker 132: are strains on a population, so
01:35:04 Speaker 132: strains with respect to either beavers
01:35:06 Speaker 132: or coyotes, it can in fact
01:35:09 Speaker 132: lead to higher birth rates and
01:35:11 Speaker 132: and therefore having a counter effect
01:35:14 Speaker 132: on on or the opposite effect
01:35:16 Speaker 132: on controlling populations. We heard the
01:35:19 Speaker 132: the comment. We heard the comments
01:35:20 Speaker 132: about the county should should further
01:35:23 Speaker 132: explore non-lethal control methods with respect
01:35:25 Speaker 132: to fencing in in the case
01:35:27 Speaker 132: of of coyotes, beaver baffles with
01:35:29 Speaker 132: respect to to protecting infrastructure in
01:35:31 Speaker 132: that regard, and also guardian animals.
01:35:32 Speaker 132: We heard comments about the current
01:35:34 Speaker 132: bylaws being barbaric in nature, particularly
01:35:36 Speaker 132: with respect to removing the ears
01:35:38 Speaker 132: and tails, with respect to needing
01:35:40 Speaker 132: to make a claim, and then
01:35:42 Speaker 132: we also heard comments about the
01:35:44 Speaker 132: term nuisance animals. is a very
01:35:46 Speaker 132: subjective term, and maybe not one
01:35:48 Speaker 132: appreciated by some. The one thing
01:35:52 Speaker 132: we heard from from folks on
01:35:53 Speaker 132: both sides of of the debate,
01:35:55 Speaker 132: if you will, is the need
01:35:57 Speaker 132: for more education. So perhaps there's
01:35:57 Speaker 132: the need for more education on
01:35:59 Speaker 132: non-lethal control methods. And in the
01:36:02 Speaker 132: farm sector, we also heard the
01:36:04 Speaker 132: comments about the need for more
01:36:06 Speaker 132: more education on here's why we
01:36:08 Speaker 132: are hiring trappers to control these,
01:36:10 Speaker 132: and and and here's the impacts
01:36:12 Speaker 132: on on farmers' livelihoods and and
01:36:14 Speaker 132: and operations in that regard. As
01:36:17 Speaker 132: part of this work, the county
01:36:19 Speaker 132: also reached out to Ministry of
01:36:22 Speaker 132: Natural Resources and Forestry staff, who
01:36:25 Speaker 132: who didn't have significant comments on
01:36:26 Speaker 132: the matter, other note other than
01:36:27 Speaker 132: noting that the county shouldn't restrict
01:36:29 Speaker 132: landowners from protecting their properties. And
01:36:31 Speaker 132: we made this clear on September
01:36:33 Speaker 132: the third with the Agricultural Advisory
01:36:35 Speaker 132: Committee. And I just want to
01:36:38 Speaker 132: put a fine point on it
01:36:40 Speaker 132: here: that regardless of what happens
01:36:42 Speaker 132: with with council's future considerations with
01:36:43 Speaker 132: respect to the bylaws, either to
01:36:45 Speaker 132: refine them. and pass new bylaws,
01:36:47 Speaker 132: or to perhaps discontinue the bylaws.
01:36:49 Speaker 132: There's nothing in the staff recommendations
01:36:51 Speaker 132: at this stage that would impact
01:36:54 Speaker 132: landowners, whether they be farmers or
01:36:55 Speaker 132: non-farmers, ability to lawfully protect their
01:36:56 Speaker 132: properties with respect to trapping animals.
01:36:59 Speaker 132: In that regard, one of the
01:37:01 Speaker 132: other comments we heard after the
01:37:03 Speaker 132: public meeting was actually a request
01:37:05 Speaker 132: for further consultation from the Saugeen
01:37:08 Speaker 132: Ojibway Nation. So we've had an
01:37:09 Speaker 132: initial meeting with Saugeen Ojibway Nation
01:37:10 Speaker 132: in. With Sauk and Ojibwe Nation
01:37:12 Speaker 132: Environment Office staff in this regard,
01:37:14 Speaker 132: but this is something we'd like
01:37:16 Speaker 132: to explore further further with their
01:37:18 Speaker 132: team. And so, as part of
01:37:20 Speaker 132: the report that went to Agriculture
01:37:22 Speaker 132: Advisory Committee, we also opened up
01:37:24 Speaker 132: the floor, and and we're eager
01:37:25 Speaker 132: to hear more comments from the
01:37:28 Speaker 132: committee. Many many of the members
01:37:30 Speaker 132: of that committee have significant lived
01:37:33 Speaker 132: experience with respect to to coyotes
01:37:34 Speaker 132: and beavers in that regard. So
01:37:36 Speaker 132: we're really happy to hear the
01:37:38 Speaker 132: the comments that were shared with
01:37:40 Speaker 132: respect to some of the comments
01:37:43 Speaker 132: that were shared by. the committee,
01:37:44 Speaker 132: there was definitely echoed calls for
01:37:46 Speaker 132: for more education in that regard,
01:37:48 Speaker 132: and and that's something again, regardless
01:37:50 Speaker 132: of what happens with these bylaws,
01:37:52 Speaker 132: I think county staff would be
01:37:54 Speaker 132: interested in exploring further and looking
01:37:56 Speaker 132: to collabourate with farmers and trappers
01:37:58 Speaker 132: and others on in that regard.
01:38:00 Speaker 132: We heard reiterated calls that the
01:38:02 Speaker 132: compensation to trappers hasn't been increased
01:38:04 Speaker 132: over the years, and therefore it's
01:38:05 Speaker 132: not reflecting their their the cost
01:38:07 Speaker 132: of doing business for them in
01:38:09 Speaker 132: that. regard, with respect to the
01:38:11 Speaker 132: equipment or with respect to mileage
01:38:13 Speaker 132: and various other things, we heard
01:38:15 Speaker 132: from farmers that that in many
01:38:16 Speaker 132: cases trapping is an absolutely last
01:38:18 Speaker 132: resort. Farmers have invested a significant
01:38:21 Speaker 132: amount of resources in securing their
01:38:22 Speaker 132: properties, whether they be fences. And
01:38:23 Speaker 132: there was talk of some of
01:38:25 Speaker 132: the fencing that's used around some
01:38:27 Speaker 132: of our orchard properties, but there
01:38:28 Speaker 132: was also talk about very costly
01:38:29 Speaker 132: electric fencing in that regard, with
01:38:31 Speaker 132: respect to keeping their livestock safe
01:38:32 Speaker 132: in that regard, and so. Stock
01:38:34 Speaker 132: safe in that regard, and so
01:38:35 Speaker 132: trapping is sort of a last
01:38:37 Speaker 132: resort. We heard comments about the
01:38:39 Speaker 132: fact that that the the proliferation
01:38:40 Speaker 132: of some of these animals might
01:38:42 Speaker 132: be as a result of significant
01:38:44 Speaker 132: loss of natural habitat across the
01:38:46 Speaker 132: county, as we do see more
01:38:49 Speaker 132: development across the county, and as
01:38:52 Speaker 132: we do see additional lands cleared
01:38:54 Speaker 132: for farming or resource use in
01:38:57 Speaker 132: that regard. We heard comments from
01:39:00 Speaker 132: committee members noting that even guardian
01:39:02 Speaker 132: dogs can be hit or miss,
01:39:03 Speaker 132: and and different farmers have had
01:39:06 Speaker 132: success or not with respect to
01:39:07 Speaker 132: use in guardian. With respect to
01:39:08 Speaker 132: using guardian dogs as as a
01:39:09 Speaker 132: means by which to protect livestock,
01:39:11 Speaker 132: we we heard that the number
01:39:14 Speaker 132: of nuisance animals does not
01:39:16 Speaker 132: appear to be waning, even though
01:39:17 Speaker 132: these bylaws and bounties, if you
01:39:20 Speaker 132: will, have been been in effect
01:39:24 Speaker 132: for for quite some time. We
01:39:26 Speaker 132: also had some questions about the
01:39:28 Speaker 132: ability to remove dams to prevent
01:39:30 Speaker 132: flooding and whether or not there
01:39:32 Speaker 132: was any restrictions from either the
01:39:33 Speaker 132: Department of Fisheries and Oceans or
01:39:36 Speaker 132: Conservation Authorities as it pertained to
01:39:37 Speaker 132: to working in waterways in that
01:39:39 Speaker 132: regard. And then. finally, we heard
01:39:41 Speaker 132: comments with respect to the fact
01:39:42 Speaker 132: that coyotes don't just impact livestock.
01:39:44 Speaker 132: There have been no one pet
01:39:46 Speaker 132: attacks and kills in that regard,
01:39:49 Speaker 132: and and thankfully, we haven't seen
01:39:50 Speaker 132: human as much human interaction in
01:39:53 Speaker 132: that regard. But there was the
01:39:55 Speaker 132: warning that that we need to
01:39:57 Speaker 132: be cautious there. So, with respect
01:39:59 Speaker 132: to next steps on this project,
01:40:01 Speaker 132: staff noted that based on the
01:40:03 Speaker 132: comments we've heard, we need to
01:40:04 Speaker 132: do some further research. We need
01:40:05 Speaker 132: to do some some further consideration
01:40:07 Speaker 132: here. As I noted, we'll. sit
01:40:09 Speaker 132: down further with a number of
01:40:09 Speaker 132: parties, including the Saugye and Jeju
01:40:12 Speaker 132: Bay Nation, and really try to
01:40:14 Speaker 132: come up with a balanced recommendation
01:40:16 Speaker 132: that can be brought to council
01:40:18 Speaker 132: at a later date with respect
01:40:20 Speaker 132: to these bylaws. At this stage,
01:40:21 Speaker 132: I don't have a date for
01:40:23 Speaker 132: you for when when that could
01:40:25 Speaker 132: be brought back. And then the
01:40:26 Speaker 132: next main item on the agenda
01:40:27 Speaker 135: was was what many people would
01:40:30 Speaker 136: consider their favourite part of the
01:40:35 Speaker 136: agricultural advisory committee agendas, and that's
01:40:36 Speaker 136: the roundtable discussion. And and and
01:40:38 Speaker 136: there's always good comments shared and
01:40:39 Speaker 137: insights from from our diverse spectrum
01:40:42 Speaker 137: of participants in that. regard. There
01:40:43 Speaker 137: were some initial comments made with
01:40:46 Speaker 137: respect to the impact of of
01:40:48 Speaker 137: weather on on farmers and and
01:40:51 Speaker 137: farming. This this most recent growing
01:40:55 Speaker 137: season, some noted that it had
01:40:57 Speaker 137: been near drought like conditions and
01:40:59 Speaker 138: it was very impactful. Others noted
01:41:01 Speaker 138: where they were in the county
01:41:02 Speaker 138: or just across the line in
01:41:04 Speaker 139: Bruce County, it they weren't hit
01:41:10 Speaker 139: as hard.
01:41:25 Speaker 139: But one of the
01:41:56 Speaker 139: takeaways there from staff was that
01:41:58 Speaker 140: where there are administrative processes needed
01:42:01 Speaker 140: approvals at either the county or
01:42:03 Speaker 140: municipal. That are either the county
01:42:07 Speaker 140: or municipal level, there there needs
01:42:08 Speaker 140: to be some expediency there with
01:42:11 Speaker 140: respect to enabling farmers to be
01:42:12 Speaker 140: able to react quickly and and
01:42:15 Speaker 140: and do what's best for their
01:42:17 Speaker 140: their crops and livestock. In that
01:42:20 Speaker 140: regard, there was a bit of
01:42:21 Speaker 140: a celebration with respect to the
01:42:23 Speaker 140: recent tax reduction on craft cider
01:42:27 Speaker 140: makers, and it was noted that
01:42:28 Speaker 140: Craft Cider Week is coming up
01:42:31 Speaker 140: very soon. Town of Blue Mountains
01:42:32 Speaker 140: and the municipality of Weehard shared
01:42:36 Speaker 140: that their open fields, their collabourative
01:42:38 Speaker 140: open fields event, is coming. back
01:42:40 Speaker 140: on September 27th. We did have
01:42:41 Speaker 140: some questions from the committee on
01:42:43 Speaker 140: rural severance policies, rural property standards
01:42:45 Speaker 140: bylaws, and whether or not the
01:42:49 Speaker 140: county had any drone policies in
01:42:51 Speaker 140: place. And then, similar to our
01:42:52 Speaker 140: our news and celebrations section from
01:42:54 Speaker 140: this morning at County Council, we
01:42:56 Speaker 140: also heard that we're in the
01:42:58 Speaker 140: thick of fall fair season, so
01:42:59 Speaker 140: there was lots of good comments
01:43:02 Speaker 140: about fall fairs and and noting
01:43:04 Speaker 140: that it's a great way to
01:43:06 Speaker 140: get out and connect with agriculture
01:43:09 Speaker 140: and to celebrate agriculture in that
01:43:11 Speaker 140: regard. And then finally. From that
01:43:12 Speaker 140: regard, and then finally, Chair Smith
01:43:14 Speaker 140: invited the county to, or invited
01:43:15 Speaker 140: the committee to suggest any additional
01:43:18 Speaker 140: topics they'd like to hear more
01:43:20 Speaker 140: about for the coming December tenth
01:43:22 Speaker 140: agricultural advisory committee meeting. So that's
01:43:25 Speaker 140: my summary. But certainly, happy to
01:43:28 Speaker 140: take any questions if there are
01:43:29 Speaker 140: any. Madam. Thank you. Any questions
01:43:32 Speaker 140: or comments? I think you gave
01:43:34 Speaker 140: us some good details there. Thank
01:43:36 Speaker 140: you very much, Director Taylor. I'll
01:43:39 Speaker 140: ask the question. Then all those
01:43:41 Speaker 140: in favour? And that motion is
01:43:43 Speaker 140: carried. Thank you. That'll. Thank you.
01:43:45 Speaker 140: That allows us to move on
7.c PSR-CW-05-25 2026 Response Time Performance Plan
Council discussed the 2026 response time performance plan, noting historical improvements, current metrics, and upcoming changes to dispatch priorities based on urban and rural distinctions. Speakers highlighted challenges in meeting targets due to geography, distance, and system limitations, including concerns about automatic fire truck dispatches for chest pain calls. A motion was carried after a vote where no members opposed it.
01:43:47 Speaker 140: to item seven C. It's recommended
01:43:49 Speaker 140: that the 2026 response time performance
01:43:51 Speaker 140: plan, as outlined in the report
01:43:52 Speaker 140: PSRCW0525, be approved and submitted to
01:43:54 Speaker 140: the Ministry of Health. May I
01:43:58 Speaker 140: ask for a mover? Move by
01:44:01 Speaker 140: Councillor McKay, and seconded by Councillor
01:44:03 Speaker 140: Pringle. It's now on the floor
01:44:04 Speaker 140: for discussion. Welcome, Director McNabb. Morning,
01:44:07 Speaker 140: Warden and County Council. Just bring
01:44:08 Speaker 140: up the presentation. Hey, we're in
01:44:09 Speaker 140: business. Good morning, Warden County Council.
01:44:11 Speaker 140: Today, here to talk to you
01:44:14 Speaker 140: about the 2026 response time plan.
01:44:15 Speaker 141: So, the the 2026 response time
01:44:19 Speaker 141: performance plan is outlined in the.
01:44:20 Speaker 140: report PSRCW zero five twenty five.
01:44:24 Speaker 140: Be approved and submitted to the
01:44:25 Speaker 140: Ministry of Health. Each year, we
01:44:26 Speaker 140: develop a plan, and it's for
01:44:27 Speaker 140: the upcoming year. And we submit
01:44:30 Speaker 140: that to the Ministry prior to
01:44:33 Speaker 140: the end of October. That plan
01:44:35 Speaker 140: is measured the following year, and
01:44:36 Speaker 140: we report those numbers to the
01:44:38 Speaker 140: Ministry of Health by by the
01:44:39 Speaker 140: end of March of the of
01:44:41 Speaker 140: the following year. The plan itself
01:44:42 Speaker 141: was developed back in two. Was
01:44:46 Speaker 141: developed back in 2012, based upon
01:44:48 Speaker 141: what we were meeting at that
01:44:50 Speaker 141: time for response time targets. Since
01:44:51 Speaker 141: that time, I believe around 2016,
01:44:53 Speaker 141: we did improve upon those targets.
01:44:54 Speaker 141: C task one was eight minutes
01:44:56 Speaker 141: at 50. We've actually made that
01:44:57 Speaker 141: to 60 at that time, and
01:44:58 Speaker 141: our C task three to five
01:45:00 Speaker 141: was at 30 minutes and reduced
01:45:01 Speaker 142: that to 20 minutes. And those
01:45:03 Speaker 142: targets have been in place. The
01:45:05 Speaker 142: plan itself revolves around C task
01:45:07 Speaker 142: levels, conditions of the patient. There's
01:45:08 Speaker 142: five of them. for calls that
01:45:11 Speaker 142: are dispatched code four. So the
01:45:14 Speaker 142: targets, the first one being how
01:45:15 Speaker 142: quickly we get a defibrillator to
01:45:19 Speaker 142: the side of a patient or
01:45:21 Speaker 142: a cardiac arrest within six minutes.
01:45:24 Speaker 142: Our C task one calls, which
01:45:25 Speaker 142: are like your unconscious patients, what
01:45:27 Speaker 142: we call obviously immediate threats, within
01:45:29 Speaker 142: eight minutes for C task ones.
01:45:31 Speaker 142: These two categories for the whole
01:45:32 Speaker 142: county for the year of 2024
01:45:34 Speaker 142: was just over 200 calls. So
01:45:35 Speaker 142: not a very large amount of
01:45:37 Speaker 142: calls. in that area. The C
01:45:37 Speaker 142: task two, three, four, and five
01:45:39 Speaker 142: criteria. This is something that the
01:45:44 Speaker 142: county can set the target and
01:45:46 Speaker 142: the time. And so we actually
01:45:47 Speaker 142: set the target at fifteen minutes,
01:45:53 Speaker 142: ninety percent of the time for
01:45:55 Speaker 142: C task two, and then C
01:45:57 Speaker 142: task three, four, and five, which
01:45:59 Speaker 142: are more less severe emergency calls.
01:46:01 Speaker 142: That's twenty minutes, ninety percent of
01:46:02 Speaker 142: the time. We we use the
01:46:05 Speaker 142: ninety percent marker because. it really
01:46:07 Speaker 142: does give the indicator of what
01:46:09 Speaker 142: the normative expectation of a paramedic
01:46:10 Speaker 142: service would be. If you call
01:46:12 Speaker 142: nine times out of ten, when
01:46:13 Speaker 142: we say that we're there within
01:46:15 Speaker 142: fifteen minutes and thirty-five seconds, we
01:46:17 Speaker 142: can truly say that that's the
01:46:18 Speaker 142: way it happens. So this is
01:46:20 Speaker 142: the results, and we presented this
01:46:22 Speaker 142: back in last March when we
01:46:23 Speaker 142: submitted to the ministry. So we
01:46:24 Speaker 142: met all the targets at that
01:46:26 Speaker 142: time, and then you can see
01:46:27 Speaker 142: from the five-year average that. we've
01:46:28 Speaker 142: been pretty consistent throughout that time.
01:46:31 Speaker 142: The last couple years, we've met
01:46:32 Speaker 142: all the targets, which is good.
01:46:35 Speaker 142: We have struggled in the past
01:46:37 Speaker 142: with our C tasks too, within
01:46:39 Speaker 142: 15 minutes. But the last couple
01:46:44 Speaker 142: years, we've been able to meet
01:46:45 Speaker 142: all those targets. Another way of
01:46:47 Speaker 142: looking at calls, other than through
01:46:49 Speaker 142: C tasks, is by your 90th
01:46:51 Speaker 142: percentile for all code force brought
01:46:53 Speaker 142: together, and this is something we
01:46:54 Speaker 142: keep a close eye on. We
01:46:56 Speaker 142: try to keep this well. Obviously,
01:46:59 Speaker 142: we try to go as quickly
01:47:02 Speaker 142: as we can, but this has
01:47:05 Speaker 142: been a some. Can but this
01:47:07 Speaker 142: has been some guiding post for
01:47:10 Speaker 142: us is around 15 minutes. You
01:47:12 Speaker 142: can see till June 30th this
01:47:14 Speaker 142: year we're similar to last year
01:47:18 Speaker 142: at 15:35. Traditionally, this will get
01:47:21 Speaker 142: better through the year unless December
01:47:25 Speaker 142: is really snowy. But generally, better
01:47:27 Speaker 142: weather will will be able to
01:47:30 Speaker 142: improve upon that time going forward.
01:47:32 Speaker 142: But 2024 was 15:26 for the
01:47:34 Speaker 142: whole year. The average response time
01:47:35 Speaker 142: we do monitor this. Again, these
01:47:37 Speaker 142: aren't requirements, but stuff we watch,
01:47:39 Speaker 142: and it doesn't really give the
01:47:39 Speaker 142: public. really good indicator because you
01:47:40 Speaker 142: could have 20 minute response time
01:47:41 Speaker 142: and lots of two minute response
01:47:42 Speaker 142: times, but it does give you
01:47:45 Speaker 142: a feel. You know, is your
01:47:46 Speaker 142: response times going up per call
01:47:47 Speaker 142: or are they going down? And
01:47:48 Speaker 142: you can see within four seconds
01:47:49 Speaker 142: they're holding. So these are the
01:47:50 Speaker 142: recommended response times. No changes for
01:47:52 Speaker 142: next year as long as council
01:47:52 Speaker 142: approves. Just as far as call
01:47:57 Speaker 142: volume, we continue to see call
01:48:01 Speaker 142: volume going up. yearly. Last year
01:48:06 Speaker 142: was a four point two three
01:48:09 Speaker 142: percent increase, and this year when
01:48:10 Speaker 142: we looked at the call volume,
01:48:12 Speaker 142: it's up over eight percent. When
01:48:14 Speaker 142: you look at the last five
01:48:17 Speaker 142: years, I believe in the spring
01:48:19 Speaker 142: it was five point nine percent
01:48:22 Speaker 142: per year, just under thirty percent
01:48:24 Speaker 142: in the last five years. And
01:48:27 Speaker 142: if you look at the ORH
01:48:28 Speaker 142: modelling that they did, they predicted
01:48:30 Speaker 142: it to be five point eight.
01:48:31 Speaker 142: So, been pretty accurate so far.
01:48:34 Speaker 142: Again, what you have mixed in
01:48:36 Speaker 142: there, you have years that are
01:48:38 Speaker 142: high and years that are low,
01:48:41 Speaker 142: but you can't just look at
01:48:42 Speaker 142: one year at a time. You
01:48:45 Speaker 142: probably have to look at a
01:48:46 Speaker 142: three to five window. The idea
01:48:49 Speaker 142: being, though, is that with that
01:48:52 Speaker 142: ORH plan, that we continue to
01:48:54 Speaker 142: meet these response time targets, and
01:48:57 Speaker 142: you know plan for the increased
01:48:58 Speaker 142: call volume yearly. This year has
01:48:59 Speaker 142: been a big year for us.
01:49:01 Speaker 142: We migrated from a electronic medical
01:49:05 Speaker 142: record that we've been with for
01:49:08 Speaker 142: fifteen years to a new platform.
01:49:10 Speaker 142: We went from a product called.
01:49:11 Speaker 143: ESO, which at one time was
01:49:16 Speaker 143: called Intervet, and to a new
01:49:18 Speaker 143: software provider called PreHos, both well-renowned
01:49:19 Speaker 142: service providers in this space. But
01:49:22 Speaker 142: just with the transition in April
01:49:23 Speaker 142: until now, we still are having
01:49:25 Speaker 142: some complications with bringing the data
01:49:26 Speaker 142: together to to report on those
01:49:27 Speaker 143: response times, and also with the
01:49:31 Speaker 143: new provider bringing in location of
01:49:34 Speaker 140: calls to be able to to.
01:49:36 Speaker 140: get in the outside responding municipality
01:49:39 Speaker 140: into the county, because not only
01:49:42 Speaker 140: are we measured by our response
01:49:46 Speaker 140: time within the county, it's all
01:49:48 Speaker 140: calls within the county. So if
01:49:51 Speaker 140: Wellington or Bruce comes in, those
01:49:53 Speaker 140: have to be included. Now we're
01:49:56 Speaker 140: very close on that data. Like
01:49:58 Speaker 140: I would say, it won't be
01:50:01 Speaker 140: long before we get it resolved,
01:50:05 Speaker 140: but we just couldn't get
01:50:07 Speaker 140: it done in time for the
01:50:09 Speaker 140: report. There's nothing in regards to
01:50:12 Speaker 140: reporting to the ministry that we
01:50:14 Speaker 140: have to have it, but it's
01:50:18 Speaker 140: just something we'd like to provide,
01:50:22 Speaker 140: like a mid-year number. I usually
01:50:24 Speaker 140: be able to give you that
01:50:25 Speaker 140: to the I usually build it
01:50:28 Speaker 140: to give you that to June
01:50:30 Speaker 140: thirtieth, but this year just wasn't
01:50:32 Speaker 140: able to get it done. There
01:50:33 Speaker 140: will be some changes coming up
01:50:35 Speaker 140: in paramedic services around dispatching of
01:50:36 Speaker 140: calls and and also response time
01:50:38 Speaker 140: standards. But just ahead of that,
01:50:40 Speaker 140: one thing that we're going to
01:50:42 Speaker 140: ask for consideration of in the
01:50:44 Speaker 140: twenty twenty six budget is the
01:50:46 Speaker 140: ability to go back to do
01:50:48 Speaker 140: more more or less a update
01:50:49 Speaker 140: to the. comprehensive deployment review. The
01:50:51 Speaker 140: data that we looked at originally
01:50:53 Speaker 140: through RH was till May of
01:50:55 Speaker 140: 2022. They went back five years,
01:50:56 Speaker 140: and because of COVID, they even
01:50:59 Speaker 140: went back another five years just
01:51:01 Speaker 140: to make sure there wasn't anything
01:51:03 Speaker 140: incorrect in the data. But since
01:51:04 Speaker 140: that time, we, if May of
01:51:06 Speaker 140: next year, we'll four years of
01:51:09 Speaker 140: data, and also four years of
01:51:10 Speaker 140: growth data, and also we'll be
01:51:11 Speaker 140: able to measure those three 12-hour
01:51:13 Speaker 140: cars that've been added. since the
01:51:14 Speaker 140: start, with with the upcoming two
01:51:17 Speaker 140: more cars coming in in 2027,
01:51:18 Speaker 140: and then another car down the
01:51:19 Speaker 140: road. We'd like to be able
01:51:23 Speaker 140: to look at it and see
01:51:25 Speaker 140: if we're on the right trajectory,
01:51:27 Speaker 140: and see if these that the
01:51:28 Speaker 140: original recommendations still. Do we need
01:51:31 Speaker 140: more or less resources to be
01:51:32 Speaker 140: able to meet those demands as
01:51:34 Speaker 140: we go forward? The other thing
01:51:36 Speaker 140: I'll talk about. it here soon
01:51:41 Speaker 140: is the what we would do
01:51:43 Speaker 140: with this with ORH. There is
01:51:46 Speaker 140: a most likely a change coming
01:51:48 Speaker 140: to the response time standards, and
01:51:50 Speaker 140: we would work that in there
01:51:52 Speaker 140: as well to make sure we're
01:51:55 Speaker 140: on the right path. So, a
01:51:56 Speaker 140: couple new things happening in paramedic
01:51:59 Speaker 140: services that are fairly large is
01:52:00 Speaker 140: one is the it's called Medical
01:52:02 Speaker 140: Priority Dispatch System MPS. This system
01:52:03 Speaker 140: is world renowned, credited. evidence-based triage
01:52:06 Speaker 140: tool that they use at dispatch,
01:52:08 Speaker 140: and it breaks it down into
01:52:10 Speaker 140: five criteria for emergency calls instead
01:52:12 Speaker 140: of right now two. This is
01:52:14 Speaker 140: something that's moving across the province
01:52:16 Speaker 140: to all dispatch centres. Simcoe went
01:52:19 Speaker 140: within the last year. Cambridge, CAC,
01:52:22 Speaker 140: which services Wellington, Waterloo, Dufferin, they're
01:52:24 Speaker 140: actually going right now. Mississauga has
01:52:25 Speaker 140: moved over Ottawa. Niagara and Toronto
01:52:26 Speaker 140: have always been on it. and
01:52:29 Speaker 140: London will go next October. So
01:52:31 Speaker 140: this new programme will help better
01:52:32 Speaker 140: triage calls. I look forward to
01:52:34 Speaker 140: it. It really looks after the
01:52:36 Speaker 140: high priority emergency calls really well.
01:52:39 Speaker 140: For instance, if you had a
01:52:41 Speaker 140: cardiac arrest and and for first
01:52:42 Speaker 141: the first day the first call
01:52:49 Speaker 144: came in, somebody short of breath,
01:52:53 Speaker 144: they were vomiting, and then a
01:52:53 Speaker 145: cardiac arrest came in. Today they're
01:52:57 Speaker 146: both a code four call. The
01:53:01 Speaker 146: thing is, is they they can't
01:53:02 Speaker 146: identify and. They they can't identify
01:53:03 Speaker 146: an obvious immediate threat like a
01:53:05 Speaker 147: cardiac arrest, so they couldn't redirect
01:53:08 Speaker 148: that first ambulance. So what would
01:53:11 Speaker 148: happen is the the first ambulance
01:53:13 Speaker 148: going to the shorter breath, which
01:53:14 Speaker 148: would be a lesser priority but
01:53:15 Speaker 148: still a code four, would would
01:53:18 Speaker 148: have to carry on. In the
01:53:19 Speaker 148: in the system we're in today,
01:53:23 Speaker 148: in the MPDS system, what happens
01:53:25 Speaker 148: is is they're able to blend
01:53:26 Speaker 148: these higher priority calls and say
01:53:28 Speaker 148: cardiac arrest can trump that other
01:53:30 Speaker 149: one. So one they they put
01:53:34 Speaker 150: the colours, purple is your highest.
01:53:38 Speaker 150: They would actually make that a
01:53:40 Speaker 150: purple. and the other one would
01:53:41 Speaker 150: be a red, so it would
01:53:43 Speaker 150: supersede it. So, look forward to
01:53:45 Speaker 150: that type of delineation of calls.
01:53:46 Speaker 150: And then there's also the ability
01:53:48 Speaker 150: on the lower end to better
01:53:49 Speaker 150: triage calls or alternate pathways as
01:53:52 Speaker 62: the system grows. You know, what
01:54:00 Speaker 62: is alternate pathways instead of maybe
01:54:02 Speaker 62: taking people to the hospital? Maybe
01:54:03 Speaker 142: there's other avenues through community paramedicine
01:54:05 Speaker 142: or other community resources as far
01:54:08 Speaker 142: as transport. Now we're in the
01:54:10 Speaker 142: early days of that, but that's
01:54:11 Speaker 142: kind of where the system would
01:54:13 Speaker 142: go. With that, also because of
01:54:15 Speaker 142: the change in MPDS, the province
01:54:16 Speaker 142: is moving forward with a new
01:54:18 Speaker 142: response time standard that will most
01:54:20 Speaker 142: likely be released next year. I
01:54:22 Speaker 142: don't have the timeframe yet. I
01:54:25 Speaker 142: was actually fortunate to be on
01:54:26 Speaker 142: the committee as the developing ones,
01:54:28 Speaker 142: and but we haven't seen it
01:54:30 Speaker 142: officially yet. But we just from
01:54:32 Speaker 142: our association and a meeting just
01:54:33 Speaker 142: at our zone this last week,
01:54:35 Speaker 142: they they still say. it'll be
01:54:36 Speaker 142: happening next year. It'll go away
01:54:38 Speaker 142: from the C task response time
01:54:40 Speaker 142: standards. They'll go back more to
01:54:41 Speaker 142: the dispatch priority. So your your
01:54:45 Speaker 142: code four red red purple reported
01:54:46 Speaker 142: up to the ministry. So with
01:54:48 Speaker 142: that with that ORH, if that's
01:54:49 Speaker 142: the case at that time, we'll
01:54:50 Speaker 142: have the right information. We'll be
01:54:52 Speaker 142: able to use that direction to
01:54:55 Speaker 142: ensure we are on the right
01:54:56 Speaker 142: path. The thing is, when we
01:54:59 Speaker 142: when we work with ORH, we
01:55:00 Speaker 142: really did focus on the 10
01:55:02 Speaker 142: and 15 minutes. Ten and fifteen-minute
01:55:03 Speaker 142: responses: eight minutes for for urban
01:55:05 Speaker 142: and fifteen minutes for rural. So,
01:55:09 Speaker 142: I believe we are on a
01:55:10 Speaker 142: solid path for response times. Good
01:55:12 Speaker 142: questions. Okay, thank you very much.
01:55:13 Speaker 142: We'll put it out for any
01:55:15 Speaker 142: questions for Director McNabb or comments,
01:55:17 Speaker 142: Deputy Warden. Thank you, Madam Warden.
01:55:17 Speaker 142: Thank you, Kevin, for the presentation.
01:55:19 Speaker 142: It's always really interesting to see
01:55:20 Speaker 142: those numbers. I think in the
01:55:22 Speaker 142: past I've asked a question similar.
01:55:23 Speaker 142: You know, it appears at least
01:55:25 Speaker 142: like we've got the really low-hanging
01:55:27 Speaker 142: fruit, and we're working our way
01:55:29 Speaker 142: up the tree, so to speak,
01:55:30 Speaker 62: in terms of how do we
01:55:40 Speaker 62: get those times down, how do
01:55:41 Speaker 62: we get those response rates up.
01:55:42 Speaker 62: And it sounds like the new
01:55:43 Speaker 62: system that you're talking about that
01:55:45 Speaker 151: will happen in next October in
01:55:49 Speaker 151: London. Was it next October or
01:55:51 Speaker 151: this? Next October, but. is it
01:55:52 Speaker 152: still geography that is really hanging
01:55:56 Speaker 152: those numbers where they are, or
01:55:57 Speaker 152: making them steady where they are?
01:55:59 Speaker 152: Or is there something else that
01:56:05 Speaker 153: we can do to try to,
01:56:09 Speaker 153: short of putting more cars on
01:56:11 Speaker 154: the road? Of course, is there
01:56:15 Speaker 154: something else we can be doing
01:56:22 Speaker 155: or looking at to reduce those
01:56:26 Speaker 155: response times? I would say the
01:56:27 Speaker 155: approach that we took. is probably
01:56:29 Speaker 155: about the best approach we could
01:56:31 Speaker 155: take in in rural Ontario, forty
01:56:34 Speaker 155: five hundred square kilometres. Distance is
01:56:35 Speaker 156: an issue, but it also is
01:56:39 Speaker 157: volume. Like each year, our volume
01:56:42 Speaker 158: goes up, and we do have
01:56:45 Speaker 158: concentrate centres. So, if you look
01:56:47 Speaker 159: at the new response time standard,
01:56:50 Speaker 160: they'll actually have standards for urban
01:56:53 Speaker 160: and rural and remote. We will
01:56:54 Speaker 160: have a couple by the looks
01:56:56 Speaker 160: of it, urban Hanover and Owen
01:56:58 Speaker 161: Sound, and the rest will be
01:57:01 Speaker 162: rural. But barring all those numbers,
01:57:06 Speaker 163: I think it's a balance. you
01:57:10 Speaker 163: know. If you live out in
01:57:12 Speaker 163: the country and it takes you
01:57:13 Speaker 164: 15 minutes to get milk, you
01:57:15 Speaker 164: probably understand it takes you 15
01:57:26 Speaker 142: minutes to get an ambulance or
01:57:29 Speaker 165: close to it. But we can't
01:57:31 Speaker 165: have it 25 or 30 because
01:57:33 Speaker 165: we don't have enough cars, and
01:57:35 Speaker 165: try to position ambulances as best
01:57:37 Speaker 166: we can to to make up
01:57:39 Speaker 166: that area. So if you look
01:57:40 Speaker 166: at the work that ORH did,
01:57:42 Speaker 166: you know we know Hanover and
01:57:43 Speaker 140: One Sound are our most concentrated
01:57:46 Speaker 140: municipalities. They were the first ones
01:57:47 Speaker 140: to get an increased car, and
01:57:49 Speaker 140: then. you know, eight and will
01:57:50 Speaker 167: be built. It'll still protect that
01:57:52 Speaker 167: area. We try to push it
01:57:55 Speaker 167: out into the more rural areas.
01:57:57 Speaker 140: But then the next car is
01:57:59 Speaker 140: in Feversham. There's not a ton
01:58:00 Speaker 140: of calls out there, but it's
01:58:03 Speaker 140: a huge area. So what we're
01:58:05 Speaker 140: trying to do is balance out
01:58:07 Speaker 140: the difference between you know, your
01:58:08 Speaker 140: most bang for your buck is
01:58:10 Speaker 140: to put them all in your
01:58:14 Speaker 140: most urban spot. But the thing
01:58:15 Speaker 140: is, you got to balance that
01:58:17 Speaker 140: out to have a you know
01:58:19 Speaker 140: a fair response time for the
01:58:21 Speaker 140: rural area too. So it's trying
01:58:23 Speaker 140: to, I guess, or I guess
01:58:25 Speaker 140: L or H called it the
01:58:27 Speaker 140: morality response times. That's what we
01:58:30 Speaker 140: try to do. Just real quickly,
01:58:31 Speaker 140: I do want to say that
01:58:32 Speaker 140: I appreciate all the work that
01:58:34 Speaker 140: Kevin and his team do. They
01:58:36 Speaker 140: do a tremendous job for the
01:58:37 Speaker 140: county, and I, in no means,
01:58:40 Speaker 140: meant any criticism. I do appreciate
01:58:42 Speaker 140: all the good work that you
01:58:44 Speaker 140: do and your team for sure.
01:58:46 Speaker 140: Thank you. Okay, thank you. So
01:58:48 Speaker 140: I'll look around, and we'll go
01:58:50 Speaker 140: to Councillor Eccles next. Thank you.
01:58:52 Speaker 140: I guess just in the numbers,
01:58:53 Speaker 140: the one that stands out is
01:58:55 Speaker 140: in that first category, the sudden
01:58:56 Speaker 140: cataract, cardiac cataract, cardiac arrest. No,
01:58:59 Speaker 140: no responses in Chatsworth. and Southgate,
01:59:00 Speaker 140: but the other two that kind
01:59:02 Speaker 140: of jump out is that Blue
01:59:03 Speaker 168: Mountains, Gray Georgian Bluffs, and and
01:59:11 Speaker 168: Gray Highlands are zero. Does that
01:59:13 Speaker 168: mean that we didn't meet that
01:59:15 Speaker 168: on any of that? That's zero
01:59:16 Speaker 169: percent. And I guess further to
01:59:19 Speaker 169: you know, is it geography? Is
01:59:21 Speaker 169: it just bad roads and we
01:59:25 Speaker 169: can't get there in those municipalities,
01:59:26 Speaker 170: or you know, how is it
01:59:29 Speaker 170: that? yeah, ninety percent in the
01:59:30 Speaker 58: urban areas, but in our other,
01:59:34 Speaker 58: you know, west grade, we're forty
01:59:36 Speaker 58: percent give or take. We got
01:59:38 Speaker 58: there, but in those three, it's
01:59:42 Speaker 58: zero. And I, yeah, just that
01:59:43 Speaker 58: stands out. Just doesn't seem to
01:59:46 Speaker 58: make sense. Why we couldn't have
01:59:47 Speaker 58: done it at least once, anyways,
01:59:49 Speaker 58: to get ten percent, but it's
01:59:50 Speaker 62: a zero. So this would be
02:00:00 Speaker 62: majority would be geography. If you
02:00:02 Speaker 62: look at a six minute response
02:00:04 Speaker 62: time, the response time is the
02:00:05 Speaker 62: time from the pager goes off
02:00:07 Speaker 62: till we arrive. So if you
02:00:08 Speaker 62: add in a minute to two
02:00:09 Speaker 62: minutes of shoot time to get
02:00:11 Speaker 62: in truck, find it where you're
02:00:13 Speaker 62: going, your drive time is you
02:00:14 Speaker 62: know four, four and a half
02:00:16 Speaker 62: minutes, maybe five minutes. If you
02:00:18 Speaker 62: find it where you're going within
02:00:19 Speaker 62: a minute and get going. If
02:00:20 Speaker 62: you if you look at West
02:00:22 Speaker 62: Grey, the the vast area of
02:00:23 Speaker 140: it. If the ambulances in Durham,
02:00:27 Speaker 140: the ambulance has to most likely
02:00:29 Speaker 140: respond to a cardiac arrest in
02:00:30 Speaker 140: Durham, and and these are sudden
02:00:31 Speaker 140: cardiac arrests. These aren't obvious deaths
02:00:32 Speaker 140: or traumatic deaths. These are people
02:00:34 Speaker 140: that could have been viable that
02:00:37 Speaker 140: haven't. So the numbers are lower,
02:00:39 Speaker 140: I believe, for twenty twenty four.
02:00:41 Speaker 140: It was sixty six calls across
02:00:42 Speaker 140: the county, not not a lot
02:00:44 Speaker 140: of calls. But if you look
02:00:47 Speaker 140: at the numbers in Hanover in
02:00:49 Speaker 140: and Old Sound, like you'll see
02:00:50 Speaker 140: those percentages higher because they are
02:00:52 Speaker 140: isolated to a large centre. Like
02:00:54 Speaker 140: so, so everything seems like escalated.
02:00:56 Speaker 140: But but if you look at
02:00:59 Speaker 140: the size of Gray Highlands or
02:01:01 Speaker 140: Southgate or West Gray, like unless
02:01:03 Speaker 140: those are happening like in the
02:01:05 Speaker 140: in the town of Dundalk or
02:01:07 Speaker 140: in the town of Durham, those
02:01:08 Speaker 140: calls the likelihood. We did a
02:01:09 Speaker 171: presentation probably. Well, when I was
02:01:15 Speaker 171: in this role, so probably six
02:01:16 Speaker 171: years. ago, we actually mapped out
02:01:18 Speaker 171: around a town of what realistically,
02:01:19 Speaker 172: from a base, we could meet
02:01:22 Speaker 172: that target in, and it was
02:01:24 Speaker 172: a good way to tell the
02:01:25 Speaker 172: story of like it really is
02:01:25 Speaker 172: a distance issue. And and I
02:01:27 Speaker 173: know those numbers are low; they
02:01:31 Speaker 174: don't look great, but like that
02:01:33 Speaker 174: six minutes in rural Ontario is
02:01:35 Speaker 174: hard to meet. If I could,
02:01:37 Speaker 175: but in the town of the
02:01:39 Speaker 84: blue, there's a fairly large concentration.
02:01:42 Speaker 84: and we have a car right
02:01:46 Speaker 84: there, but it's still at zero.
02:01:49 Speaker 84: I guess you know we built
02:01:50 Speaker 84: that there to have that response.
02:01:52 Speaker 84: You know, it just shows up
02:01:54 Speaker 84: as something being weird. You know,
02:01:58 Speaker 84: did all the heart attacks happen
02:02:01 Speaker 84: in Ravenna? That far away from?
02:02:02 Speaker 84: It just you know I get
02:02:05 Speaker 84: it. Yeah, Durham, Ann Arbor. You
02:02:08 Speaker 84: know, in those urban areas, vast
02:02:12 Speaker 84: number of people. That's where it's
02:02:15 Speaker 84: going to be. Number of people—that's
02:02:17 Speaker 84: where it's going to be. But
02:02:19 Speaker 84: we invested in the Blue Mountains
02:02:23 Speaker 84: to have that there, and it
02:02:27 Speaker 84: still shows up as zero on
02:02:29 Speaker 84: that sudden cardiac. I, strange. The
02:02:30 Speaker 84: Blue Mountains—it's at right at the
02:02:32 Speaker 84: village, and that is a fairly
02:02:35 Speaker 84: concentrated spot. And if you look
02:02:36 Speaker 84: at even the older age people,
02:02:38 Speaker 84: healthier in that area and stuff
02:02:40 Speaker 84: like that. I'm not saying that's
02:02:42 Speaker 84: the case here, but Blue Mountains
02:02:44 Speaker 84: is a large spot. Like we
02:02:47 Speaker 84: are definitely not making that response
02:02:51 Speaker 84: time in Thornbury. I think it's
02:02:55 Speaker 84: not. It won't happen. Like when
02:02:57 Speaker 84: we get the Thornbury card, there
02:03:02 Speaker 84: or anything that happens there, we
02:03:05 Speaker 84: would make it in that area.
02:03:08 Speaker 84: So, like if it's not happening
02:03:10 Speaker 84: right in that in that core,
02:03:12 Speaker 84: sudden cardiac arrest, we won't make
02:03:14 Speaker 84: it. And and it depends on
02:03:15 Speaker 176: the year. Some years are better
02:03:20 Speaker 176: than others. This is a year
02:03:21 Speaker 176: that they didn't meet, and and
02:03:24 Speaker 176: typically it's where the call took
02:03:25 Speaker 176: place. And like if if if
02:03:26 Speaker 177: it's within that range, we will
02:03:28 Speaker 140: get there. Just if it's outside
02:03:30 Speaker 140: that range, we won't. Or the
02:03:32 Speaker 140: worst-case scenario, we back to the
02:03:35 Speaker 140: dispatch tool. If we're on another
02:03:37 Speaker 140: call, we're assigned to that call,
02:03:39 Speaker 140: and the cardiac arrest comes in
02:03:44 Speaker 140: right after it, then we are
02:03:45 Speaker 140: on that call that may not
02:03:46 Speaker 140: be. We call them obvious immediate
02:03:48 Speaker 140: threats: choking, cardiac arrest, unconscious. Now
02:03:49 Speaker 140: we'll be able to respond off
02:03:50 Speaker 140: of those other calls, even though
02:03:51 Speaker 140: they potentially could be life-threatening. We
02:03:53 Speaker 140: already know there is a real
02:03:55 Speaker 140: life threat, and they'll be able
02:03:56 Speaker 140: to take. us off and assign
02:03:58 Speaker 140: it. Okay, thank you. We're going
02:04:02 Speaker 140: to go to Councillor Greg next.
02:04:04 Speaker 140: Thank you for the opportunity. And
02:04:05 Speaker 140: I would just note we actually
02:04:07 Speaker 140: don't see the exact number of
02:04:10 Speaker 140: calls that came in. So I
02:04:11 Speaker 140: mean, if there was only one
02:04:12 Speaker 140: call and you don't make it
02:04:14 Speaker 140: once, then I'll give you a
02:04:16 Speaker 140: zero percent. There is in the
02:04:19 Speaker 140: charts. It does look like, despite
02:04:22 Speaker 140: the fact that your call volume
02:04:25 Speaker 140: is certainly increasing. That you have
02:04:28 Speaker 140: the capacity to try to respond
02:04:30 Speaker 140: to the new dispatch ranking or
02:04:33 Speaker 140: prioritization, which is is good to
02:04:38 Speaker 140: see. You're hitting 100 in a
02:04:40 Speaker 140: lot of the the C tasks
02:04:41 Speaker 140: four and five in most of
02:04:42 Speaker 140: the communities, so that's great to
02:04:45 Speaker 140: see. And hopefully, this dispatch initiative
02:04:48 Speaker 140: is rewarding. I do have one
02:04:51 Speaker 140: question. This is something from personal
02:04:52 Speaker 140: experience, Kevin. In the last. year,
02:04:54 Speaker 140: I made a call for paramedic
02:04:55 Speaker 140: assistance to an individual who who
02:04:57 Speaker 140: needed such, and I was asked
02:04:58 Speaker 140: by dispatch, "What are your needs?"
02:04:59 Speaker 140: And my response was, "I just
02:05:02 Speaker 140: need an ambulance." They were arrived
02:05:03 Speaker 140: incredibly promptly, and then thirty seconds,
02:05:05 Speaker 140: a minute later, along comes the
02:05:07 Speaker 140: city fire truck, and I didn't
02:05:09 Speaker 140: ask for the city fire truck.
02:05:11 Speaker 140: It's not an egregious cost. to
02:05:13 Speaker 140: the taxpayer because it is a
02:05:16 Speaker 140: full-time department to respond, but it
02:05:18 Speaker 140: is still a soft cost. And
02:05:20 Speaker 140: if that was a rural municipality
02:05:21 Speaker 140: dealing with volunteer call-ins or so
02:05:22 Speaker 140: forth, it would be a more
02:05:25 Speaker 140: significant response when it wasn't asked
02:05:26 Speaker 140: for. This new dispatch system does
02:05:28 Speaker 140: it respond or listen to that
02:05:30 Speaker 140: type of experience from from individuals
02:05:32 Speaker 140: where resources are. valuable, and at
02:05:33 Speaker 171: times we don't want to utilise
02:05:39 Speaker 171: resources that are expensive if if
02:05:41 Speaker 178: they're not necessary. So I'm just
02:05:44 Speaker 178: wondering, the changes in the dispatch,
02:05:45 Speaker 179: does it respond to that type
02:05:48 Speaker 179: of an instance too? When when
02:05:49 Speaker 179: a public member calls in, you
02:05:51 Speaker 180: know, we hear this, and you
02:05:54 Speaker 181: know, public will say, "I didn't
02:05:56 Speaker 182: ask for the fire department, didn't
02:06:00 Speaker 182: ask for the police," but that
02:06:01 Speaker 182: that is those decisions are made
02:06:07 Speaker 183: by very scriptive processes. Very script
02:06:09 Speaker 183: of processes. It's a computer aided
02:06:11 Speaker 24: dispatch system. What question to answer
02:06:15 Speaker 24: next? What resources to send? And
02:06:17 Speaker 24: then based upon where that call
02:06:19 Speaker 24: is categorized, there's different categories that
02:06:21 Speaker 24: trigger a tiered response. So there's
02:06:23 Speaker 24: no real, there's no way to
02:06:24 Speaker 184: override it. So even if somebody
02:06:27 Speaker 185: says, "Well, I don't need this,"
02:06:31 Speaker 185: even if I call and say
02:06:32 Speaker 185: I don't need it, like I'd
02:06:34 Speaker 186: be pretty, like myself, like if
02:06:42 Speaker 186: I was in my supervisor vehicle
02:06:43 Speaker 186: and I was working, but even
02:06:44 Speaker 186: myself as a public number, it
02:06:46 Speaker 187: won't happen. To MPDS, I have
02:06:49 Speaker 187: not drove into the tiered response,
02:06:51 Speaker 187: but I know there's a lot
02:06:53 Speaker 187: of work to do in MPDS
02:06:54 Speaker 187: around tiered response. So, what that
02:06:56 Speaker 187: looks like, if there's going to
02:06:58 Speaker 187: be more choices for them to
02:07:00 Speaker 187: go to and not go to,
02:07:01 Speaker 187: that's something. We do leave tiered
02:07:02 Speaker 187: response, what call criteria they go
02:07:04 Speaker 187: to, up to the fire departments
02:07:06 Speaker 187: themselves. That really is a fire
02:07:10 Speaker 187: that's their choice, guided by their
02:07:11 Speaker 187: council. Guided by their councils, but
02:07:13 Speaker 187: I think we have settled on
02:07:14 Speaker 187: a pretty good response for, especially
02:07:15 Speaker 187: our our our part-time fire departments
02:07:17 Speaker 187: as well. It was a bit
02:07:18 Speaker 187: of a difference, is that they're
02:07:20 Speaker 187: mostly just going to what we
02:07:22 Speaker 62: call the obvious immediate threats, so
02:07:33 Speaker 188: unconscious, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, car
02:07:37 Speaker 188: accidents, industrial accidents. One sound goes
02:07:39 Speaker 188: to a bit more, you know,
02:07:40 Speaker 188: full-time fire department, but again, a
02:07:43 Speaker 188: lot of that is up to
02:07:44 Speaker 188: the fire department themselves, but. I
02:07:45 Speaker 188: would say we're also doing a
02:07:48 Speaker 188: lot of work to align tier
02:07:49 Speaker 188: response agreements to prevent errors, so
02:07:50 Speaker 188: that we you know kind of
02:07:53 Speaker 188: if you're if you're the tier
02:07:54 Speaker 188: response and West Grey would be
02:07:56 Speaker 188: similar with handovers. And again, back
02:07:58 Speaker 188: to there's no sense rolling a
02:07:59 Speaker 188: fire department to a chest pain
02:08:01 Speaker 188: call. Taking people out of work,
02:08:04 Speaker 188: the ambulance can handle it quite
02:08:09 Speaker 188: well. If there are issues of
02:08:11 Speaker 188: as far as extrication, we can
02:08:14 Speaker 188: make that call when we get
02:08:15 Speaker 188: there. But for a cardiac arrest.
02:08:18 Speaker 188: you don't want to have to
02:08:20 Speaker 188: wait till you get there to
02:08:23 Speaker 188: call because by the time somebody
02:08:25 Speaker 188: is transporting, you may or may
02:08:27 Speaker 188: not be gone by the time
02:08:28 Speaker 188: they get there. Okay. Thank you.
02:08:31 Speaker 188: And we'll go over to Councillor
02:08:32 Speaker 188: McQueen. You met him more than
02:08:35 Speaker 188: just following up with Councillor Greg's
02:08:37 Speaker 188: comments about resources. I've heard just
02:08:38 Speaker 188: recently of the last Labour Day
02:08:40 Speaker 188: weekend, of an individual that passed
02:08:45 Speaker 188: the long weekend, but. Long weekend,
02:08:47 Speaker 188: the family tried desperately to reach
02:08:48 Speaker 188: the coroner or whoever pronounces people
02:08:51 Speaker 188: deceased. Couldn't get any calls. Ended
02:08:52 Speaker 188: up calling nine one one, OPP,
02:08:55 Speaker 188: fire, and and ambulance showed up.
02:08:56 Speaker 188: It was pretty evident the person
02:08:59 Speaker 188: had passed, but it it couldn't.
02:09:00 Speaker 188: So, again, the point is is
02:09:02 Speaker 188: all showed up. But is that
02:09:03 Speaker 188: a normal? I know it's a
02:09:05 Speaker 188: long weekend, and maybe people weren't
02:09:09 Speaker 188: being able to be reached, but.
02:09:10 Speaker 188: Won't be able to be reached,
02:09:12 Speaker 188: but it just seemed very excessive
02:09:15 Speaker 188: for somebody that's already definitely past
02:09:17 Speaker 188: the point where they're long past.
02:09:18 Speaker 188: I don't want to get any
02:09:20 Speaker 188: details because, ah, but it was
02:09:22 Speaker 188: just I was shared that experience.
02:09:24 Speaker 188: Yeah, I understand what you're saying.
02:09:26 Speaker 62: Common sense to that, but on
02:09:36 Speaker 62: the other side of it is,
02:09:37 Speaker 62: is those decisions made by like
02:09:38 Speaker 62: untrained providers potentially that person someday.
02:09:40 Speaker 62: could be viable. We even see
02:09:42 Speaker 62: it sometimes with car accidents. They
02:09:43 Speaker 62: say, "Well, fire's not needed." Then,
02:09:45 Speaker 62: if they're not called, we get
02:09:46 Speaker 62: there, and it takes us fifteen
02:09:48 Speaker 137: minutes to drive there. Then they're
02:09:51 Speaker 137: trapped. We can't get them out.
02:09:54 Speaker 137: So now we're waiting another fifteen
02:09:57 Speaker 137: minutes. Now we're thirty minutes. It's
02:09:58 Speaker 137: those things about. No system is
02:09:59 Speaker 137: perfect. When when there's a potential
02:10:02 Speaker 137: for life, that's where we you
02:10:04 Speaker 137: know sometimes resources roll and we
02:10:05 Speaker 137: don't need them. We try to
02:10:07 Speaker 137: cancel them as quick as we
02:10:08 Speaker 137: can. But in those settings where
02:10:09 Speaker 137: potential to save a life, then.
02:10:11 Speaker 137: that's where we send resources and
02:10:12 Speaker 137: cancel them off. So appreciate all
02:10:14 Speaker 137: the questions and comments from from
02:10:15 Speaker 137: counselors and and and Kevin's response
02:10:17 Speaker 137: has been spot on in terms
02:10:19 Speaker 62: of some of the challenges that
02:52:02 Speaker 62: our paramedics teams face each and
02:52:04 Speaker 62: every day in terms of the
02:52:05 Speaker 62: distance that they have to cover,
02:52:07 Speaker 62: and and some of the challenges
02:52:08 Speaker 62: and Nan and I were fortunate
02:52:33 Speaker 62: enough to do a ride ride
02:52:35 Speaker 46: along with with Kevin and some
02:52:39 Speaker 46: of his team members and just
02:52:42 Speaker 46: to see some of the dynamics
02:52:43 Speaker 46: that they have to to interact
02:52:45 Speaker 46: with on a on a regular
02:52:46 Speaker 46: basis, whether it's you know some
02:52:48 Speaker 46: patients are doing some tied up
02:52:49 Speaker 46: with cars doing transfers to to
02:52:51 Speaker 46: hospitals well outside of our region,
02:52:54 Speaker 46: and how then they shift resources
02:52:56 Speaker 46: in order to make sure that
02:52:58 Speaker 46: there's enough resources on. on on
02:53:01 Speaker 46: hand and ready to to respond
02:53:02 Speaker 46: as quick as they can. It
02:53:04 Speaker 46: was it was really eye opening
02:53:07 Speaker 46: experience and and just want to
02:53:09 Speaker 46: thank Kevin and his team for
02:53:11 Speaker 46: all that they do each and
02:53:14 Speaker 46: every day. With respect to that,
02:53:17 Speaker 46: I think that's where through the
02:53:20 Speaker 46: deployment review and through some of
02:53:23 Speaker 46: the improvements that are proposed as
02:53:24 Speaker 46: part of that, in order to
02:53:28 Speaker 46: respond to the increase response response
02:53:29 Speaker 46: that we continue. to see each
02:53:32 Speaker 46: and every year continues to grow
02:53:34 Speaker 46: based on our population growth and
02:53:35 Speaker 46: based on our demographics within Gray
02:53:36 Speaker 46: County. I think it's important to
02:53:39 Speaker 46: continue on with those. As Kevin
02:53:41 Speaker 46: noted, we're going to ask for
02:53:42 Speaker 46: just to revisit that, just do
02:53:50 Speaker 189: a gut check in twenty twenty
02:53:53 Speaker 189: six, make sure we're still on
02:53:55 Speaker 189: the right path based on what
02:53:56 Speaker 189: we're seeing from a response activity
02:53:58 Speaker 189: plus a growth perspective. But the
02:54:00 Speaker 189: importance of adding some of those
02:54:01 Speaker 189: additional bases, those additional vehicles, staff,
02:54:02 Speaker 190: and Additional vehicles, staff enhancements. I
02:54:05 Speaker 190: think it's critical in order to
02:54:07 Speaker 190: continue to to make sure that
02:54:08 Speaker 191: we're able to respond as quickly
02:54:11 Speaker 191: as as as we can. So
02:54:12 Speaker 191: again, thanks Kevin and his team
02:54:15 Speaker 191: for all that they do each
02:54:17 Speaker 191: and every day, and and yeah,
02:54:19 Speaker 191: appreciate. Okay, thank you. So that
02:54:21 Speaker 191: does look like that's the end,
02:54:24 Speaker 191: and I'll just verify online. We
02:54:27 Speaker 191: don't have any hands up. Okay,
02:54:29 Speaker 191: all right. So thank you. both,
02:54:32 Speaker 191: Director Minkov, and thank you for
02:54:33 Speaker 192: to the CAO for what you've
02:54:37 Speaker 192: just added there. I'll call the
02:54:38 Speaker 192: question. All those in favour? And
02:54:40 Speaker 193: that motion is carried. Okay. Now,
02:54:43 Speaker 193: logistically, we the next presentation may
02:54:45 Speaker 193: take a bit. We also have
02:54:47 Speaker 193: some staff logistics to make sure
02:54:49 Speaker 193: that they're able to present in
02:54:51 Speaker 193: time. However, lunch has arrived five
02:54:54 Speaker 193: minutes ago, and it is a
02:54:56 Speaker 193: hot lunch, so we are going
02:54:58 Speaker 193: to need to call lunch at
02:55:00 Speaker 193: this point. But if we can
02:55:01 Speaker 193: keep ourselves to be back in
02:55:02 Speaker 193: our seats by quarter two. That
02:55:04 Speaker 193: would make sure that staff have
02:55:06 Speaker 193: adequate time to be able to
02:55:08 Speaker 193: present the material for the next
02:55:10 Speaker 193: item. Okay, so we'll do that
02:55:13 Speaker 193: until twelve forty-five. Please, thank you.
02:55:15 Speaker 193: Okay. If I can welcome all
02:55:18 Speaker 193: of our county council members back
02:55:20 Speaker 193: to their seats, and the clerk
02:55:22 Speaker 193: is just coming up to the
02:55:24 Speaker 193: dais, and we will get started
02:55:25 Speaker 193: shortly. Okay, welcome back, County Council.
02:55:27 Speaker 193: We are going to continue now,
02:55:30 Speaker 193: and I thank Senior Planner Hillier
02:55:33 Speaker 193: and Engineering Manager Ireton for their
02:55:36 Speaker 193: patience while we need to break.
02:55:38 Speaker 193: But you have our fresh, full
02:55:40 Speaker 193: attention at this point in time.
02:55:42 Speaker 193: So I would like to put
02:55:44 Speaker 193: it out that we are at
7.d PDR-CW-51-25 MTO Resolution Request - Grey Road 5
A speaker moved a resolution to receive Report PDRCW 5125 and support a Ministry of Transportation request prohibiting a future fourth leg extension at the proposed intersection of Grey Road Five and New City Street. A subsequent amendment was moved and seconded to adjust the motion's design speed parameters, specifically requesting a staff report on reducing the limit to sixty kilometres per hour for the school zone; this amendment was carried by voice vote. Following the vote, the chair announced that the main motion was amended to reduce the design speed from 90 km/h to 80 km/h in front of the new school and to include the request for a staff report on the proposed 60 km/h limit.
02:55:46 Speaker 193: Item Seven D, and the recommendation
02:55:49 Speaker 193: is that report PDRCW fifty one
02:55:51 Speaker 193: twenty five. 5125 be received, and
02:55:54 Speaker 193: that the committee supports a request
02:55:56 Speaker 193: from the Ministry of Transportation to
02:55:59 Speaker 193: prohibit a future fourth leg extension
02:56:01 Speaker 193: on lands east of Grey Road
02:56:04 Speaker 193: Five at the newly proposed intersection
02:56:06 Speaker 193: of Grey Road Five and the
02:56:09 Speaker 193: New City Street, and New City
02:56:11 Speaker 193: Street, accessing the future site of
02:56:13 Speaker 193: the Bruce Grey Catholic District School
02:56:17 Speaker 193: Board Secondary School, and that Grey
02:56:20 Speaker 193: County maintains the requirement of a
02:56:23 Speaker 193: 90 km. Of a 90 kilometre
02:56:25 Speaker 193: per hour design speed for Grey
02:56:26 Speaker 193: Road Five in the area of
02:56:28 Speaker 193: the proposed intersection. So there will
02:56:32 Speaker 193: be a detailed presentation to follow.
02:56:35 Speaker 193: But if I can get a
02:56:37 Speaker 193: mover and a seconder to get
02:56:38 Speaker 193: that on the floor, moved by
02:56:39 Speaker 193: Councillor Dicker, seconded by the Deputy
02:56:41 Speaker 193: Warden. So it's now on the
02:56:43 Speaker 193: floor for discussion. And welcome, Miss
02:56:45 Speaker 193: Hillier. Thank you so much, Warden
02:56:47 Speaker 193: Metressal. Much Warden Matrasov and good
02:56:49 Speaker 193: afternoon, County Council and everyone joining
02:56:50 Speaker 193: us in person or online today.
02:56:53 Speaker 193: So yeah, Trevor and I will
02:56:56 Speaker 193: be tag teaming this one. So
02:56:58 Speaker 193: I'm going to start us out
02:57:00 Speaker 193: and then hand it over to
02:57:03 Speaker 193: Trevor shortly here. But before
02:57:06 Speaker 193: we begin, as the recommendation in
02:57:09 Speaker 193: front of you notes, there's there's
02:57:11 Speaker 193: two separate items that are discussed
02:57:15 Speaker 193: within the report and that we're
02:57:17 Speaker 193: going to speak to today. So
02:57:19 Speaker 193: the first one being a request
02:57:21 Speaker 193: for a resolution that we've received
02:57:24 Speaker 193: from MTO that I'm going to
02:57:27 Speaker 193: speak to, and the second being
02:57:30 Speaker 193: that our transportation services is looking
02:57:32 Speaker 193: for some input from council with
02:57:34 Speaker 193: regards to the proposed road design
02:57:34 Speaker 193: for Gray Road Five as a
02:57:37 Speaker 193: result of the new school site
02:57:40 Speaker 193: there. So, just as a bit
02:57:43 Speaker 193: of background, so the county and
02:57:46 Speaker 193: the City of Owen Sound and
02:57:48 Speaker 193: MTO have been working alongside
02:57:50 Speaker 193: the Bruce Gray Catholic District School
02:57:52 Speaker 193: Board for probably about close to
02:57:55 Speaker 193: the past two years. now, in
02:57:56 Speaker 193: helping them to identify and prepare
02:57:57 Speaker 194: a site for a new secondary
02:58:01 Speaker 194: school in Owen Sound. So just
02:58:02 Speaker 194: where, so that we're all on
02:58:03 Speaker 194: the same page in terms of
02:58:05 Speaker 193: the location of this site, we've
02:58:07 Speaker 193: got a map up there. So
02:58:09 Speaker 193: this is the far eastern boundary
02:58:11 Speaker 193: of the city of Owen Sound.
02:58:12 Speaker 193: So as we can see, it
02:58:14 Speaker 193: has frontage on 28th Avenue East,
02:58:16 Speaker 193: which is also Grey Road Five.
02:58:18 Speaker 193: It's just north of Eighth Street
02:58:19 Speaker 193: East and south. of Highway Twenty
02:58:22 Speaker 193: One. So, if you can imagine
02:58:23 Speaker 193: where that Van Dolders business is
02:58:26 Speaker 193: at the intersection of Highway Twenty
02:58:29 Speaker 193: One and Twenty Eighth Avenue East,
02:58:31 Speaker 193: the site is just south of
02:58:32 Speaker 193: there. It's also bound; also has
02:58:34 Speaker 193: a western boundary on the County's
02:58:37 Speaker 195: Rail Trail. And so, over the
02:58:40 Speaker 193: past couple of years, as as
02:58:43 Speaker 193: I said, the county has been
02:58:46 Speaker 193: collabourating with the city, school board,
02:58:49 Speaker 193: and MTO on this project. The
02:58:52 Speaker 193: Owens. The Owen City of Owen
02:58:54 Speaker 193: Sound has recently approved a consent
02:58:57 Speaker 193: application to establish the parcel that
02:58:59 Speaker 193: the school would be situated on.
02:59:01 Speaker 193: They've also recently approved a zoning
02:59:05 Speaker 193: bylaw amendment to establish the school
02:59:10 Speaker 193: use. The city is currently in
02:59:12 Speaker 193: the works of working towards a
02:59:14 Speaker 196: site plan agreement with the school
02:59:17 Speaker 196: board. And in terms of timelines
02:59:19 Speaker 193: for construction, the school board would
02:59:21 Speaker 193: would ideally like to start some
02:59:24 Speaker 193: site grading works. this fall season,
02:59:27 Speaker 193: with construction to commence during spring
02:59:29 Speaker 193: 2026. So, in order to facilitate
02:59:31 Speaker 193: the construction of the school, this
02:59:33 Speaker 193: being a new what we call
02:59:37 Speaker 193: green fields development area of the
02:59:40 Speaker 193: city, some new local road infrastructure
02:59:42 Speaker 193: is required in this area. And
02:59:45 Speaker 193: so, again, based on sort of
02:59:47 Speaker 193: a lot of back and forth
02:59:49 Speaker 193: we've had with the city, it
02:59:52 Speaker 193: was determined that the best location
02:59:55 Speaker 193: for this new potential local road
02:59:57 Speaker 193: would be just north of kind
03:00:01 Speaker 193: of that that that site that
03:00:03 Speaker 193: we're seeing there. So I'll I'll
03:00:05 Speaker 193: give you a closer look of
03:00:07 Speaker 193: what that looks like in a
03:00:10 Speaker 193: second here. So some of the
03:00:12 Speaker 193: the conversation that we've had along
03:00:13 Speaker 193: the situating of this new road
03:00:17 Speaker 193: is that it doesn't conform to
03:00:20 Speaker 193: the county's separation distance requirements between
03:00:24 Speaker 193: new intersections or between intersections, and
03:00:27 Speaker 193: similarly with MTO, it doesn't conform
03:00:28 Speaker 193: to their intersections. To their intersection
03:00:30 Speaker 193: separation distance requirements, and so as
03:00:33 Speaker 193: a result of this, MTO has
03:00:35 Speaker 193: suggested that they could support
03:00:37 Speaker 193: the development of this road, but
03:00:40 Speaker 193: in doing so, they would request
03:00:44 Speaker 193: that Grey County pass a resolution
03:00:46 Speaker 193: such that a fourth leg extension
03:00:48 Speaker 193: would not be added to that
03:00:49 Speaker 193: intersection in the future. So again,
03:00:53 Speaker 193: I'll explain a little bit more
03:00:55 Speaker 193: in detail what that looks like
03:00:59 Speaker 193: in principle. So as part of
03:01:01 Speaker 193: this. work, a transportation impact study
03:01:02 Speaker 193: has been prepared by the school
03:01:04 Speaker 193: board, and as Trevor will speak
03:01:06 Speaker 193: to, Gray County Transportation Services is
03:01:08 Speaker 193: recommending a road design speed of
03:01:09 Speaker 193: 90 kilometres per hour here, which
03:01:11 Speaker 193: is different than the direction that's
03:01:14 Speaker 193: been put forward by the TIS
03:01:17 Speaker 193: at this stage. So, again, just
03:01:19 Speaker 193: to give us a sense of
03:01:21 Speaker 193: kind of what that approved school
03:01:23 Speaker 193: site looks like, there might be
03:01:26 Speaker 193: some slight variation as the school
03:01:28 Speaker 193: and the city move towards. And
03:01:30 Speaker 193: the city moved towards a site
03:01:33 Speaker 193: plan agreement process, but this was
03:01:36 Speaker 193: sort of the diagram that was
03:01:38 Speaker 193: put forward for the purposes of
03:01:39 Speaker 193: the zoning application. And so you
03:01:41 Speaker 193: can see the school there, kind
03:01:44 Speaker 193: of to the right of the
03:01:46 Speaker 193: screen, that would be situated closer
03:01:47 Speaker 193: to Gray Road Five or Twenty
03:01:50 Speaker 193: Eighth Avenue East. That future local
03:01:52 Speaker 193: road B is is just north
03:01:55 Speaker 193: of the school building there, and
03:01:56 Speaker 193: so would be that intersection of
03:01:58 Speaker 197: that future local road B and
03:02:06 Speaker 198: the Twenty Eighth Avenue East. That's
03:02:08 Speaker 198: in. Eighth Avenue East—that's in question
03:02:11 Speaker 199: here. So this is a diagram
03:02:14 Speaker 199: that was provided within the transportation
03:02:17 Speaker 199: impact study. So that yellow arrow
03:02:19 Speaker 199: there—that is just to situate us
03:02:21 Speaker 199: where this new intersection would be
03:02:24 Speaker 199: located. And so essentially, what MTO
03:02:25 Speaker 199: has suggested is that the lands
03:02:26 Speaker 199: to the east there, across the
03:02:30 Speaker 199: road from the school, there—they are
03:02:32 Speaker 199: recommending that no. They are recommending
03:02:34 Speaker 199: that no future access be permitted
03:02:35 Speaker 199: onto those onto that property, and
03:02:38 Speaker 199: again, that the county pass a
03:02:40 Speaker 199: resolution to that effect. So we
03:02:40 Speaker 199: have had some back and forth
03:02:42 Speaker 199: discussions with MTO on this matter,
03:02:46 Speaker 199: and there are some important planning
03:02:48 Speaker 199: considerations to recognize here. So as
03:02:50 Speaker 199: noted, this the school lands themselves
03:02:51 Speaker 199: fall within the primary settlement area
03:02:52 Speaker 199: of the city of Owen Sound,
03:02:54 Speaker 199: but they do abut. the settlement
03:02:59 Speaker 199: area boundary, and across the road
03:03:01 Speaker 199: is where the the line for
03:03:02 Speaker 199: the municipality of Meaford is. So
03:03:06 Speaker 199: lands to the east of Gray
03:03:07 Speaker 199: Road Five are located within the
03:03:10 Speaker 199: municipality of Meaford. Those lands are
03:03:12 Speaker 199: also located within the Niagara Escarpment
03:03:13 Speaker 199: Plan area, which of course doesn't
03:03:14 Speaker 199: really permit urban development. It's also
03:03:15 Speaker 199: outside of the defined settlement area
03:03:16 Speaker 199: boundary. So there are many things
03:03:19 Speaker 199: that would have to change from
03:03:20 Speaker 199: a planning policy perspective in order
03:03:21 Speaker 200: for most forms of development to
03:03:24 Speaker 201: be viable on the on the
03:03:32 Speaker 201: property across the road. Having said
03:03:33 Speaker 199: that, MTO would still like us
03:03:36 Speaker 199: to to pass this resolution. Again,
03:03:38 Speaker 199: if there were a a development
03:03:41 Speaker 199: proposal or or you know in
03:03:43 Speaker 199: twenty five years from now things
03:03:45 Speaker 199: were to change, we can certainly
03:03:48 Speaker 199: have that conversation with MTO again,
03:03:49 Speaker 199: and and there's there's many opportunities
03:03:52 Speaker 199: through that planning process, through that
03:03:54 Speaker 199: pre-submission process to have those conversations.
03:03:57 Speaker 199: We did note to MTO that
03:03:58 Speaker 199: the county is is undertaking quite
03:03:59 Speaker 199: a thorough process right now of
03:04:03 Speaker 199: having discussions with lower tier municipalities
03:04:04 Speaker 199: with regards to the potential transfer
03:04:06 Speaker 199: of county roads within settlement areas
03:04:10 Speaker 199: to the lower tier municipalities. So
03:04:13 Speaker 199: in this case. we anticipate that
03:04:15 Speaker 199: that gray road, that section of
03:04:18 Speaker 199: Gray Road Five, would be transferred
03:04:19 Speaker 199: likely to the city of Owingsound
03:04:21 Speaker 202: in future. We did note that
03:04:24 Speaker 202: you know if we were to
03:04:26 Speaker 199: pass that resolution now, it likely
03:04:28 Speaker 199: wouldn't be binding on the city.
03:04:29 Speaker 199: And we we did discuss you
03:04:31 Speaker 199: know even if we were to
03:04:32 Speaker 199: support this resolution at this stage,
03:04:33 Speaker 199: there is the potential in future
03:04:37 Speaker 199: to redact that resolution if we
03:04:39 Speaker 199: if you know development did become
03:04:40 Speaker 199: viable. in future, and that's subject
03:04:41 Speaker 199: to further discussion, of course. So,
03:04:43 Speaker 199: with these things considered at this
03:04:43 Speaker 199: stage, you know, county are the
03:04:46 Speaker 199: county is really looking to support
03:04:49 Speaker 199: the city and to support the
03:04:51 Speaker 199: school board and making this development
03:04:52 Speaker 199: of the school site feasible within
03:04:54 Speaker 199: the next year. And so, we
03:04:55 Speaker 199: are recommending to county council at
03:04:57 Speaker 199: this stage to support the request
03:05:01 Speaker 199: from MTO to develop this resolution.
03:05:03 Speaker 199: And I'll just pass it over
03:05:06 Speaker 199: to. And I'll just pass it
03:05:08 Speaker 199: off over to Trevor at this
03:05:10 Speaker 199: stage to speak about the road
03:05:13 Speaker 199: design piece. Good afternoon, County Council.
03:05:14 Speaker 199: So yeah, I'm gonna. Well, thank
03:05:17 Speaker 199: you, Becky, again for speaking about
03:05:21 Speaker 199: the planning side of this development.
03:05:24 Speaker 199: So what I'm going to speak
03:05:26 Speaker 199: about is mostly design related. So
03:05:28 Speaker 199: it's can be probably pretty technical,
03:05:30 Speaker 199: but I'll try to kind of
03:05:33 Speaker 199: walk through it and. make it
03:05:35 Speaker 199: as easy and straightforward as I
03:05:38 Speaker 199: can. So we have a hill
03:05:39 Speaker 199: that, basically, just south of the
03:05:43 Speaker 199: intersection with I twenty six. There's
03:05:44 Speaker 199: a bit of a crest hill
03:05:47 Speaker 199: that, as you drive over that,
03:05:48 Speaker 199: the new intersection is going to
03:05:51 Speaker 199: be in a situation where we
03:05:52 Speaker 199: don't have sufficient sight distance based
03:05:53 Speaker 199: on a one hundred kilometre design
03:05:55 Speaker 199: speed, and that's typically what we
03:05:57 Speaker 199: would use on any of our
03:05:59 Speaker 199: county roads, and it's sort of
03:06:02 Speaker 199: an industry practice to be twenty.
03:06:04 Speaker 199: Just to be 20 kilometres over
03:06:05 Speaker 199: your posted speed. What we do
03:06:10 Speaker 199: look at by going through the
03:06:12 Speaker 203: data, I'll get to that kind
03:06:18 Speaker 203: of information here shortly. But by
03:06:20 Speaker 203: reducing to a 90 kilometre design
03:06:21 Speaker 199: speed, we can accommodate that sight
03:06:26 Speaker 199: distance, and that really just makes
03:06:27 Speaker 199: sure that you know if a
03:06:30 Speaker 199: car comes over top of the
03:06:33 Speaker 199: crest of the hill and you
03:06:36 Speaker 199: see someone pulling out of the
03:06:38 Speaker 199: new school, that there's not going
03:06:40 Speaker 199: to be a situation where they
03:06:41 Speaker 199: could drive into the side of
03:06:42 Speaker 199: them. So I can go to
03:06:46 Speaker 199: next. So, we completed some traffic
03:06:49 Speaker 199: counts here in the spring of
03:06:52 Speaker 199: 2025, and so based on that
03:06:54 Speaker 199: traffic count information, it supports what
03:06:57 Speaker 199: we already recognized in that area.
03:06:59 Speaker 199: What we noticed is that the
03:07:01 Speaker 199: 85th percentile speed for that road
03:07:04 Speaker 199: for the southbound direction, which is
03:07:06 Speaker 199: really the critical one in this
03:07:08 Speaker 199: situation, is. eighty-five kilometres per hour.
03:07:11 Speaker 199: So, what's good about this is
03:07:14 Speaker 199: this actually lower compared to a
03:07:16 Speaker 199: lot of our county roads. A
03:07:17 Speaker 199: lot of our county roads sit
03:07:19 Speaker 199: around ninety to ninety-two. So, eighty-five
03:07:21 Speaker 199: does help us in this situation
03:07:23 Speaker 199: in terms of vehicle speeds in
03:07:27 Speaker 199: the area. During that two-week, roughly
03:07:33 Speaker 199: two-week period, we had about twenty-six
03:07:36 Speaker 199: thousand vehicles recorded. So, out of
03:07:38 Speaker 199: those twenty-six thousand vehicles, we recognize
03:07:39 Speaker 199: that thirty-two percent of the south.
03:07:41 Speaker 199: That 32% of the southbound vehicles
03:07:43 Speaker 199: were going 80 kilometres per hour
03:07:46 Speaker 199: or greater. We also saw that
03:07:49 Speaker 199: 6% were 90 kilometres per hour,
03:07:51 Speaker 199: and most of those peak speeds
03:07:53 Speaker 199: happened between the hours of 3
03:07:56 Speaker 199: and 6 p.m., which of course
03:07:57 Speaker 199: is probably a peak period for
03:07:59 Speaker 199: the school as well, with students
03:08:00 Speaker 199: leaving in the afternoon. One of
03:08:02 Speaker 199: the elements, and so on the
03:08:04 Speaker 199: right here, you can see that
03:08:06 Speaker 199: we have a histogram for speed.
03:08:08 Speaker 199: So just to kind of give
03:08:11 Speaker 199: you an idea of what this
03:08:13 Speaker 199: chart is showing, basically for the
03:08:14 Speaker 199: each vehicle. so if a vehicle
03:08:18 Speaker 199: is driving eighty kilometres per hour,
03:08:20 Speaker 199: it's going to represent one little
03:08:22 Speaker 199: tick on the bar. And the
03:08:24 Speaker 199: higher the bar is, the blue
03:08:26 Speaker 199: bars, the more vehicles driving at
03:08:28 Speaker 199: that speed. So, what's great about
03:08:30 Speaker 199: this distribution is it's very symmetrical,
03:08:33 Speaker 199: which is a great representation for
03:08:36 Speaker 199: us because it means that the
03:08:40 Speaker 199: drivers are driving based on the
03:08:42 Speaker 199: conditions and the speeds or the
03:08:45 Speaker 199: speed limit that is posted is
03:08:46 Speaker 199: being followed. relatively well, and basically
03:08:48 Speaker 199: the peak you can see where
03:08:50 Speaker 199: the dashed eighty line is. That's
03:08:51 Speaker 199: relatively where the average speed of
03:08:53 Speaker 199: vehicles is. So again, a good
03:08:54 Speaker 199: distribution for us. What we do
03:09:00 Speaker 199: notice in situations where there are
03:09:01 Speaker 199: problems, if you basically the distribution
03:09:03 Speaker 199: will change. So you might see
03:09:06 Speaker 199: a sharper peak on the left
03:09:09 Speaker 199: side, and then as it comes
03:09:11 Speaker 199: to the top, you'll see a.
03:09:12 Speaker 199: broader distribution and more of a
03:09:14 Speaker 199: tapered outside on the higher speed
03:09:17 Speaker 199: section. And what that means is
03:09:19 Speaker 199: that there's a lot of speed
03:09:21 Speaker 199: disparity. And what speed disparity means
03:09:23 Speaker 199: is you'll have vehicles maybe going
03:09:25 Speaker 199: 60 versus vehicles going 80, and
03:09:27 Speaker 199: then you get wider ranges of
03:09:30 Speaker 199: that traffic. And for that us
03:09:31 Speaker 199: for us, that's a concern because
03:09:32 Speaker 199: what happens is it causes angry
03:09:34 Speaker 199: driving, basically more potential for poor
03:09:36 Speaker 199: decision making from drivers. So, we
03:09:39 Speaker 199: have had the request from both
03:09:41 Speaker 199: the school board and the city
03:09:43 Speaker 199: to look at a sixty-kilometre zone
03:09:45 Speaker 199: here. So, we typically, when we
03:09:48 Speaker 199: do speed limit analysis, we use
03:09:53 Speaker 199: the Transportation Association of Canada's speed
03:09:54 Speaker 199: limit guidelines, and what that is
03:09:55 Speaker 199: is basically it's a a form
03:09:57 Speaker 199: that has a number of different
03:09:59 Speaker 199: elements to it that you fill
03:10:02 Speaker 199: in different criteria. So. a lot
03:10:03 Speaker 199: of them here listed like roadside
03:10:05 Speaker 199: geometry, various hazards, number of intersections
03:10:08 Speaker 199: and entrances along the stretch of
03:10:11 Speaker 199: roadway, also pedestrian and cyclist activity
03:10:15 Speaker 199: items like that. So you measure
03:10:18 Speaker 199: those criteria, and then basically the
03:10:20 Speaker 199: output of the rubric will come
03:10:22 Speaker 199: up with a suggested posted speed.
03:10:26 Speaker 199: So in this situation, what we
03:10:28 Speaker 199: determined was that the roadside conditions
03:10:29 Speaker 204: generate a 90 kilometre design speed.
03:10:32 Speaker 204: but based on policy, it recommends
03:10:35 Speaker 204: an 80 kilometre design speed, and
03:10:37 Speaker 204: that's largely based on the fact
03:10:39 Speaker 204: that we don't generally use 90
03:10:42 Speaker 204: kilometre roads in Grey County. So,
03:10:43 Speaker 205: a lot of it's driven by
03:10:48 Speaker 205: that is our kind of general
03:10:51 Speaker 205: maximum speed. So, we've also reviewed
03:10:53 Speaker 205: a lot of kind of international.
03:10:54 Speaker 205: There's basically a report that was
03:10:57 Speaker 205: done in Sweden that looked at.
03:10:59 Speaker 205: I believe was just shy of
03:11:00 Speaker 205: thirty thousand kilometres of roadway, where
03:11:02 Speaker 205: they did either speed reductions or
03:11:07 Speaker 206: speed reduction or speed increases on
03:11:09 Speaker 206: those roadway, and then generate or
03:11:11 Speaker 205: basically recorded what the effect of
03:11:14 Speaker 205: the change was. So, where this
03:11:15 Speaker 205: comes in play, this was strictly
03:11:18 Speaker 205: looking at if you just take
03:11:19 Speaker 205: an eighty-kilometre-per-hour road and drop it
03:11:26 Speaker 205: to seventy, and that's the only
03:11:28 Speaker 205: change you make. What is the
03:11:29 Speaker 205: impact on drivers for that? And
03:11:31 Speaker 205: what they found, they had seventeen
03:11:32 Speaker 205: hundred. They had 1,700 kilometres that
03:11:34 Speaker 205: were reduced, and in that they
03:11:36 Speaker 205: found that the average driver speed
03:11:38 Speaker 205: for every 10 kilometres reduced only
03:11:41 Speaker 205: dropped by about two to three.
03:11:42 Speaker 205: Basically, what we found as well
03:11:44 Speaker 205: when we do a speed reduction
03:11:47 Speaker 205: or speed increase in the county,
03:11:49 Speaker 205: we'll put counters out before and
03:11:52 Speaker 205: after that change to record those
03:11:56 Speaker 205: as well. Basically, create a similar
03:11:58 Speaker 205: process as this study, and we've
03:12:02 Speaker 205: found through predominantly through most of
03:12:03 Speaker 205: those studies, our basically what we
03:12:06 Speaker 205: see supports that claim that they
03:12:08 Speaker 205: found in the study. So I
03:12:10 Speaker 205: think of some of the ones
03:12:12 Speaker 205: like in Dundalk, where we dropped
03:12:14 Speaker 205: from fifty to forty, we'd see
03:12:16 Speaker 205: the average speed in Dundalk dropped
03:12:17 Speaker 205: about three or four kilometres per
03:12:19 Speaker 205: hour. So again, it kind of
03:12:20 Speaker 205: follows that same process. So in
03:12:21 Speaker 205: this case, by dropping to a
03:12:23 Speaker 205: sixty-kilometre per hour, we could potentially
03:12:25 Speaker 205: see. approximately about an 80 kilometre,
03:12:28 Speaker 205: 85th percentile speed, and what that
03:12:30 Speaker 205: means with the 85th percentile, it
03:12:33 Speaker 205: basically means that 15% of the
03:12:35 Speaker 205: vehicles will now be going over
03:12:38 Speaker 205: 80. And before, when we mentioned
03:12:45 Speaker 205: 6%, we're over 90. We would
03:12:48 Speaker 205: likely see a reduction on that
03:12:50 Speaker 205: as well. So, what that really
03:12:51 Speaker 205: does is, if we end up
03:12:55 Speaker 205: designing the road to a 90
03:12:59 Speaker 205: kilometres design speed, we basically, if
03:13:03 Speaker 205: conditions stay the same and we
03:13:05 Speaker 205: remain posted, we're seeing roughly 6%.
03:13:06 Speaker 205: Posted, we're seeing roughly six percent
03:13:10 Speaker 205: of vehicles that could be in
03:13:12 Speaker 205: a potential situation where they're going
03:13:14 Speaker 205: too fast, which doesn't really fall
03:13:16 Speaker 205: outside of the realm of really
03:13:18 Speaker 205: any of our roads. There's typically
03:13:20 Speaker 205: always that vast set of drivers
03:13:22 Speaker 205: that are just in that data
03:13:23 Speaker 205: set and exceed those ranges. Where
03:13:24 Speaker 205: we would see, so we did
03:13:25 Speaker 205: drop to sixty, and we did
03:13:27 Speaker 205: adjust that down again. That would
03:13:31 Speaker 205: help us in that sense, but
03:13:34 Speaker 205: it also puts us more into
03:13:37 Speaker 205: the situation of creating bigger speed
03:13:40 Speaker 205: disparity and creating a higher risk
03:13:41 Speaker 205: in terms of collisions and incidents
03:13:43 Speaker 205: due to that bigger speed disparity.
03:13:45 Speaker 205: And there's numerous numerous reports and
03:13:49 Speaker 205: studies that also support that realm.
03:13:51 Speaker 205: And the issue there, because the
03:13:56 Speaker 205: bulk of your traffic is in
03:13:57 Speaker 205: that range, the risk of any
03:14:00 Speaker 205: sort of incident is far greater
03:14:03 Speaker 205: than kind of the low end.
03:14:05 Speaker 205: And kind of the low end
03:14:06 Speaker 205: of the upper speed vehicles when
03:14:09 Speaker 205: you have a nice standard deviation.
03:14:12 Speaker 205: So we found that basically, in
03:14:15 Speaker 205: our opinion, the risk associated with
03:14:16 Speaker 205: that doesn't outweigh the benefits gained
03:14:18 Speaker 205: by dropping the speed in this
03:14:19 Speaker 205: situation. What also tends to happen
03:14:21 Speaker 205: here, because the conditions of the
03:14:22 Speaker 205: road aren't really changing, even with
03:14:27 Speaker 205: the school development being built, it
03:14:30 Speaker 205: will be offset from the road
03:14:31 Speaker 205: from a visual perspective. for drivers,
03:14:34 Speaker 205: there's not a huge amount of
03:14:37 Speaker 205: hues or anything that's going to
03:14:40 Speaker 205: change. So again, creating that disparity
03:14:41 Speaker 205: in vehicle speeds, we may see
03:14:48 Speaker 205: more, you know, poor decisions around
03:14:49 Speaker 38: passing or just issues that we
03:14:52 Speaker 38: don't really want when there could
03:14:53 Speaker 38: be potential for maybe students standing
03:14:54 Speaker 38: at the side of the road
03:14:57 Speaker 207: on their break. So one of
03:15:00 Speaker 208: the main restrictions with the and
03:15:04 Speaker 209: why we've essentially come to the
03:15:08 Speaker 209: point where we would go to
03:15:10 Speaker 209: a 90 or accept a 90
03:15:13 Speaker 209: kilometre design speed is largely due
03:15:15 Speaker 209: to two high pressure gas mains
03:15:18 Speaker 209: that are in the west shoulder
03:15:22 Speaker 209: of the road relocation. If we
03:15:28 Speaker 209: were to go to 100 kilometre
03:15:30 Speaker 209: design speed, which would be ideal,
03:15:31 Speaker 209: the gas pipelines would be at
03:15:37 Speaker 210: a insignificant depth, and we'd require
03:15:39 Speaker 210: replacement or sorry relocation, which would
03:15:40 Speaker 210: be very considerable costs. in conversations
03:15:42 Speaker 210: with the gas companies, so they're
03:15:43 Speaker 211: very limiting in that sense. What
03:15:46 Speaker 211: we can do, they are deep
03:15:48 Speaker 211: enough. We've done some borehole, or
03:15:49 Speaker 211: the school board's done borehole data
03:15:57 Speaker 211: to support that. They are deep
03:16:00 Speaker 211: enough that they could still get
03:16:02 Speaker 211: away with building a road at
03:16:06 Speaker 212: a 90 kilometre design speed. Although
03:16:11 Speaker 212: there is constraints that they'd have
03:16:12 Speaker 213: to work around, which are not
03:16:15 Speaker 213: out of the ordinary with gas
03:16:17 Speaker 214: mains, but they do come with
03:16:22 Speaker 214: some costs and some additional timing
03:16:23 Speaker 215: in order. to accommodate it, but
03:16:25 Speaker 215: again, it's really just not vibrating
03:16:35 Speaker 199: around the gas mains. No heavy
03:16:39 Speaker 199: equipment directly on them. Items that
03:16:43 Speaker 199: many contractors are aware of and
03:16:44 Speaker 199: deal with on many projects throughout
03:16:45 Speaker 199: our county and the province itself.
03:16:46 Speaker 199: So, by utilising a 90 kilometre
03:16:49 Speaker 199: design speed, we can make sure
03:16:51 Speaker 199: that we have sufficient stopping sight
03:16:52 Speaker 199: distance for those. Stoppings like distance
03:16:54 Speaker 199: for those vehicles, greatly reducing the
03:16:56 Speaker 216: potential for risks or collisions. In
03:17:01 Speaker 217: my professional opinion, I with the
03:17:03 Speaker 217: reduction down, if it went to
03:17:04 Speaker 218: an eighty, we'd be putting ourselves
03:17:07 Speaker 218: in a pretty risky situation. Mostly
03:17:09 Speaker 218: because right now we're seeing about
03:17:10 Speaker 218: thirty three percent. Even with the
03:17:12 Speaker 218: reduction, we're still seeing fifteen, and
03:17:14 Speaker 218: that's if everything kind of happens
03:17:15 Speaker 218: as it is. So those sort
03:17:17 Speaker 218: of numbers start to get up
03:17:18 Speaker 218: there. If you're saying 15 of
03:17:20 Speaker 218: your vehicles coming over the crest
03:17:22 Speaker 214: of the hill could be in
03:17:25 Speaker 214: a potential situation for an accident,
03:17:27 Speaker 214: it is risky. So that's why
03:17:32 Speaker 219: we're suggesting the 90 km design
03:17:35 Speaker 219: speed. We can do those protect
03:17:36 Speaker 219: the gas mains without relocation. And
03:17:38 Speaker 219: then again, as I talked about,
03:17:40 Speaker 205: usually issues with the speed disparity
03:17:43 Speaker 205: and going to a 60 km
03:17:46 Speaker 205: posted does add additional risk. for
03:17:47 Speaker 205: a different type of collision. Again,
03:17:50 Speaker 205: with that, as development occurs out
03:17:51 Speaker 205: there, there's potential for some commercial
03:17:52 Speaker 205: and residential over time. Once those
03:17:53 Speaker 205: developments start to occur, you'll see
03:17:56 Speaker 205: a lot more visual cues for
03:17:58 Speaker 205: drivers that will help to reduce
03:17:59 Speaker 205: their speeds naturally. And again, we'll
03:18:01 Speaker 205: monitor the development and as it
03:18:03 Speaker 205: progresses to make sure that if
03:18:06 Speaker 205: speeds are starting to come down,
03:18:10 Speaker 205: we can make those adjustments. Take
03:18:11 Speaker 205: them down. We can make those
03:18:13 Speaker 220: adjustments a lot easier without creating
03:18:15 Speaker 220: a large disparity. We would, we
03:18:17 Speaker 220: would progress with that and reduce
03:18:19 Speaker 205: the speed at that time. And
03:18:25 Speaker 205: yeah, so county staff recommends design
03:18:26 Speaker 205: speed of 90 kilometres per hour,
03:18:29 Speaker 205: and that the school board continues
03:18:30 Speaker 205: to address the hill and the
03:18:32 Speaker 205: gas mains. And yeah, so I
03:18:36 Speaker 205: don't know if there's any questions,
03:18:38 Speaker 205: but here we can take them
03:18:39 Speaker 205: now. Okay, so let's see if
03:18:41 Speaker 205: there are questions for either, and
03:18:42 Speaker 205: I'll open it up to the
03:18:44 Speaker 205: county floor. And I just need
03:18:46 Speaker 205: to see the virtual attendees. We'll
03:18:50 Speaker 205: begin with Councillor Greg. I have
03:18:52 Speaker 205: one question. Thanks, Trevor and Becky.
03:18:54 Speaker 205: The exact location of your speed
03:18:57 Speaker 205: assessment equipment. Was it located exactly
03:19:00 Speaker 205: and specific to the intersection that's
03:19:02 Speaker 205: in question? or were you further
03:19:03 Speaker 205: south? Because the the commentary in
03:19:06 Speaker 205: the report speaks to southerly traffic
03:19:07 Speaker 205: movements that you are accumulating that
03:19:09 Speaker 205: speed data from. So I'm just
03:19:11 Speaker 205: wondering, are you specific to that
03:19:13 Speaker 205: exact intersection? Through you, Warden. Yes.
03:19:16 Speaker 205: So we placed the counter. I
03:19:18 Speaker 205: believe there's a hydro pole just
03:19:20 Speaker 205: north of where the proposed intersection
03:19:29 Speaker 205: is. and it was basically facing
03:19:30 Speaker 205: south. So where the detection was
03:19:31 Speaker 205: actually occurring is within a few
03:19:33 Speaker 221: metres of where the proposed intersection
03:19:35 Speaker 221: is. And when you say facing
03:19:36 Speaker 221: south, you were getting speed data
03:19:38 Speaker 222: for vehicles going south or going
03:19:42 Speaker 58: north. With okay, you're collecting both
03:19:45 Speaker 58: directions. Okay. Okay. thank you. We'll
03:19:51 Speaker 58: go to the deputy warden. Deputy
03:19:52 Speaker 58: warden, and thank you, Trevor and
03:19:53 Speaker 58: Becky as well. A school safety
03:19:55 Speaker 58: zone. Typically, what sort of speed
03:19:56 Speaker 58: limit would you have in a
03:20:00 Speaker 58: school safety zone? Sixty kilometres, typically.
03:20:02 Speaker 58: There really is no defined rules
03:20:06 Speaker 58: against speed limits within safety zones.
03:20:08 Speaker 58: so predominantly they occur in areas
03:20:10 Speaker 58: because most of the schools are
03:20:11 Speaker 58: in areas where there's some residential
03:20:14 Speaker 223: development, so there is lower speed
03:20:19 Speaker 223: limits naturally. However, there's community safety
03:20:21 Speaker 223: zone, for instance, on Highway 10
03:20:22 Speaker 223: at the Holland Chasworth School that's
03:20:24 Speaker 224: in an 80, so there really
03:20:27 Speaker 225: is no hard fast rule around
03:20:32 Speaker 225: that. So I'm just thinking further
03:20:34 Speaker 225: down the road. Once the school
03:20:36 Speaker 225: is there and established, the stretch
03:20:39 Speaker 225: of road to the south is
03:20:41 Speaker 225: 60 kilometres. Would it not make
03:20:42 Speaker 58: a lot more sense to make
03:20:45 Speaker 58: that chunk in front of the
03:20:46 Speaker 58: school 60 kilometres now and be
03:20:51 Speaker 58: done with it and make it
03:20:55 Speaker 58: consistent rather than up and then
03:20:56 Speaker 58: down and then up again once
03:20:58 Speaker 58: you get further down on whatever
03:21:00 Speaker 58: that road number is, and try
03:21:02 Speaker 58: to avoid the cost cutting that
03:21:04 Speaker 58: hill down and and potential impacts
03:21:05 Speaker 226: to the gas line. Yeah. So
03:21:09 Speaker 226: effectively, there's two different there's two
03:21:14 Speaker 226: instances here. So posted speed and.
03:21:15 Speaker 226: design speed, although they relate to
03:21:17 Speaker 58: one another, they are different. The
03:21:19 Speaker 58: posted speed could be reduced. We
03:21:22 Speaker 58: do see the potential for the
03:21:25 Speaker 58: risk of the larger differences in
03:21:28 Speaker 58: speed. Now, again, as you mentioned,
03:21:34 Speaker 58: it is 60 to the south,
03:21:35 Speaker 58: and then Gray Road Five, as
03:21:37 Speaker 58: it goes to the hospital, is
03:21:44 Speaker 58: also 80. So, depending on, and
03:21:45 Speaker 58: again, the piece to the south
03:21:47 Speaker 227: is kind of outside of our
03:21:49 Speaker 227: jurisdiction. So, I'm not sure the
03:21:50 Speaker 227: exact reasoning why it's a 60.
03:21:55 Speaker 227: That's not. for us to decide.
03:21:57 Speaker 228: So, I at least from what
03:22:00 Speaker 228: I understand, it's from the intersection
03:22:01 Speaker 228: at Superior Street is what I've
03:22:03 Speaker 228: been told. So again, be peace
03:22:04 Speaker 229: north of Superior Street. Whether that
03:22:07 Speaker 229: is also a sixty or not,
03:22:11 Speaker 229: it be potentially debated. But again,
03:22:13 Speaker 229: yes, you can reduce the speed.
03:22:16 Speaker 230: We do see there is risk
03:22:19 Speaker 230: with the largest, the bulk of
03:22:21 Speaker 230: the vehicles that would be travelling
03:22:26 Speaker 35: potentially now. You. put yourself at
03:22:28 Speaker 35: risk of having vehicles that follow
03:22:31 Speaker 35: the hard fast rule of driving
03:22:34 Speaker 35: sixty, and then there's people that
03:22:35 Speaker 35: still drive eighty or eighty five.
03:22:43 Speaker 201: Now they can come up on
03:22:46 Speaker 201: each other quicker. You create just
03:22:47 Speaker 201: more instance for concern. Now in
03:22:48 Speaker 201: terms of design speed, that's a
03:22:51 Speaker 201: different thing. It's strictly a measure
03:22:52 Speaker 201: of stopping sight distance. So the
03:22:53 Speaker 205: concern there is any vehicle that
03:22:56 Speaker 205: does exceed eighty is going to
03:22:58 Speaker 205: be a potential for an incident.
03:23:00 Speaker 205: So even if you reduce to
03:23:02 Speaker 205: sixty, and you still see twenty-five
03:23:04 Speaker 205: percent of your vehicles going above
03:23:06 Speaker 205: eighty, versus maybe five percent above
03:23:08 Speaker 205: ninety, there's a significant difference in
03:23:18 Speaker 205: that. So from our opinion, it
03:23:21 Speaker 205: makes more sense to or design
03:23:28 Speaker 205: based on the ninety to avoid
03:23:31 Speaker 205: that risky situation. Next, we're going
03:23:32 Speaker 205: to go to Councillor Body, and
03:23:33 Speaker 205: then we'll go to Councillor McQueen.
03:23:35 Speaker 205: Body, and then we'll go to
03:23:39 Speaker 205: Councillor McQueen. Oh, sorry, Councillor Eccles.
03:23:41 Speaker 205: I believe you are next. So
03:23:42 Speaker 205: you go next, then I'll go
03:23:45 Speaker 205: over to Councillor Body, and then
03:23:48 Speaker 205: over to Councillor McQueen. Thank you.
03:23:49 Speaker 205: And I guess that was. What's
03:23:51 Speaker 205: the precedent? I mean, Sullivan School.
03:23:53 Speaker 205: We've got them. Any place you
03:23:56 Speaker 205: have a school, and you said
03:23:57 Speaker 205: the Holland School. There's a couple
03:24:00 Speaker 205: more out there that they can
03:24:02 Speaker 205: think of that are, right there.
03:24:06 Speaker 205: Yeah. I don't know why we're
03:24:09 Speaker 205: debating because before the school doors
03:24:12 Speaker 205: open, there's going to be—I don't
03:24:13 Speaker 205: know how many coming here saying,
03:24:15 Speaker 205: "Oh, well, this is now going
03:24:17 Speaker 205: to be community safety zone," all
03:24:20 Speaker 231: of that because it's a school
03:24:23 Speaker 231: area. I can take you to
03:24:25 Speaker 231: one in Kitchener. I happened to
03:24:27 Speaker 232: be riding in a car when
03:24:31 Speaker 232: somebody got picked up there. I
03:24:32 Speaker 232: was riding; I wasn't driving. I
03:24:34 Speaker 233: I get it for the sight
03:24:37 Speaker 233: lines, building it to the ninety
03:24:39 Speaker 234: kilometres zone, but I just I
03:24:41 Speaker 35: can't support that we're not going
03:24:44 Speaker 235: to put it at sixty. Do
03:24:49 Speaker 235: the construction because there's when you're
03:24:50 Speaker 235: doing the construction, it's going to
03:24:52 Speaker 235: be reduced, right? So start it
03:24:54 Speaker 235: up. It's sixty, and we won't
03:24:55 Speaker 235: be back here spend a whole
03:24:56 Speaker 235: lot of time. arguing back and
03:24:58 Speaker 235: forth, up and down, build it
03:25:00 Speaker 235: to the ninetieth, yeah, to get
03:25:01 Speaker 235: those sight lines coming up because
03:25:03 Speaker 236: there is a set of stop
03:25:05 Speaker 236: lights at the end there, right?
03:25:07 Speaker 236: Yeah, it. I'm just baffled as
03:25:09 Speaker 236: MTO wanting to kick all of
03:25:10 Speaker 237: this back upon us, put it
03:25:17 Speaker 237: at sixty and let it go.
03:25:18 Speaker 237: Design it, but put it at
03:25:20 Speaker 237: sixty, and this idea of going
03:25:20 Speaker 237: at ninety in school. zone is,
03:25:22 Speaker 238: you know, that's not very good
03:25:25 Speaker 239: forward planning. There, that was one
03:25:30 Speaker 239: of the planners. That that's where
03:25:32 Speaker 239: we're looking at this. So, that's
03:25:34 Speaker 239: my thoughts. Okay, thank you. Then
03:25:36 Speaker 240: we will go to. Did you
03:25:39 Speaker 240: have a response or no? Okay,
03:25:40 Speaker 240: so we'll go to Councillor Body
03:25:41 Speaker 24: and then we'll go over to
03:25:44 Speaker 24: Councillor McQueen. I'm picking up the
03:25:46 Speaker 24: consensus, and we'll have a a
03:25:47 Speaker 24: motion to amend in a few
03:25:50 Speaker 241: minutes. When after the discussion's gone
03:25:53 Speaker 242: through, a note in Grey Highlands,
03:25:56 Speaker 242: in front of the Grey Highlands
03:25:58 Speaker 242: school on Highway 10, it is
03:25:59 Speaker 242: 50 kilometres up, walk down from
03:26:01 Speaker 242: here. South of Eighth Street is
03:26:03 Speaker 242: 60 kilometres. If the posted speed
03:26:04 Speaker 242: is going to end up being
03:26:05 Speaker 242: 60 kilometres, is there any? advantage
03:26:06 Speaker 243: to it being designed to 90
03:26:09 Speaker 243: kilometres, and what are the cost
03:26:11 Speaker 243: consequences likely to be estimated at
03:26:12 Speaker 243: between designing it for 60 and
03:26:15 Speaker 243: designing it for 90? Peter Warden,
03:26:17 Speaker 244: in terms of the costs, so
03:26:19 Speaker 245: we've been quite a while ago,
03:26:21 Speaker 245: and it was at that time
03:26:23 Speaker 245: we were talking about 100 kilometre
03:26:25 Speaker 245: design speed. Hundred kilometre design speed,
03:26:26 Speaker 245: I believe it was in the
03:26:28 Speaker 245: range of about half a million
03:26:30 Speaker 186: in that at that time. I'm
03:26:36 Speaker 186: not sure exactly where it is,
03:26:39 Speaker 186: just because it's not really our
03:26:40 Speaker 186: design; it's part of three D
03:26:42 Speaker 246: consultant there, so I can't speak
03:26:45 Speaker 246: to what the exact cost was.
03:26:47 Speaker 246: But I would assume probably just
03:26:49 Speaker 246: like south side of 500. Yeah,
03:26:51 Speaker 246: yeah. So for. 60, because it
03:26:53 Speaker 246: really the the design speed again,
03:26:56 Speaker 246: it's a separate issue. The posted
03:26:58 Speaker 246: speed, whether you go to 60
03:26:58 Speaker 246: or 80, you're still going to
03:27:00 Speaker 246: have number of vehicles exceeding 80
03:27:02 Speaker 246: kilometres per hour. So the concern
03:27:04 Speaker 246: is really revolves around that. You
03:27:05 Speaker 246: want to make sure that you're
03:27:07 Speaker 247: reducing the risk of potential collisions
03:27:10 Speaker 247: because there's insufficient stop sight distance.
03:27:12 Speaker 247: So. whether it's a 60 or
03:27:13 Speaker 247: 80, there is a slightly reduced
03:27:14 Speaker 248: amount of number of vehicles that
03:27:20 Speaker 248: will come down from that speed.
03:27:21 Speaker 248: But historically, what we found
03:27:24 Speaker 199: is it's not going to be
03:27:26 Speaker 199: significant enough. So if it's posted
03:27:28 Speaker 199: at 60, we'd still anticipate probably
03:27:30 Speaker 199: 15 to 20 percent exceeding 80
03:27:32 Speaker 199: kilometres per hour. So the concern
03:27:34 Speaker 199: is if you go with an
03:27:35 Speaker 199: 80 kilometre design speed, those vehicles
03:27:43 Speaker 199: now are at a risk of
03:27:45 Speaker 199: potential. collision by going to ninety-kilometre
03:27:47 Speaker 249: design speed. That reduces significantly down
03:27:50 Speaker 249: to potentially anywhere between two to
03:27:52 Speaker 249: five percent, depending whether it's sixty
03:27:53 Speaker 249: or eighty kilometres per hour. And
03:27:55 Speaker 249: that study is based on the
03:27:57 Speaker 250: way it's situated right now. Doing
03:28:01 Speaker 250: the study, approximately where the school
03:28:02 Speaker 250: is, and that has to change
03:28:03 Speaker 250: when you put in an input
03:28:05 Speaker 251: an intersection and start having big
03:28:09 Speaker 252: yellow buses going through. Correct. School
03:28:12 Speaker 252: buses going through. Correct. It will
03:28:13 Speaker 252: change. The issue will be is
03:28:14 Speaker 252: whether people see those school buses
03:28:21 Speaker 252: when they make the turn onto
03:28:22 Speaker 253: Gray Road Five. So coming over
03:28:25 Speaker 253: that crest, they're not going to
03:28:27 Speaker 253: see them when they make that
03:28:30 Speaker 253: turn. They're going to start speeding
03:28:33 Speaker 253: up, and then they'll come over
03:28:35 Speaker 253: the crest of the hill, and
03:28:36 Speaker 254: then school buses will be there.
03:28:40 Speaker 254: So they're basically, and I think
03:28:42 Speaker 254: one of the pictures in the
03:28:44 Speaker 254: slideshow kind of shows what it
03:28:47 Speaker 254: looks like right now. Okay, so
03:28:50 Speaker 254: if you did, you want that
03:28:52 Speaker 254: back up, that slide back up.
03:28:54 Speaker 254: So while you're doing that, we're
03:28:55 Speaker 255: going to go to Councillor McQueen
03:28:58 Speaker 255: and then over to Councillor Dobrin.
03:29:00 Speaker 255: I think, Madam Ward, would agree
03:29:02 Speaker 255: with Deputy Mayor, or sorry, Deputy
03:29:03 Speaker 254: Warden, with regards to that speed.
03:29:06 Speaker 254: If you're heading north, before you
03:29:07 Speaker 254: get to Eighth Street, you're doing
03:29:11 Speaker 254: sixty. It doesn't make sense to
03:29:13 Speaker 254: speed up to eighty, and you're
03:29:15 Speaker 254: coming to a stoplight. And the
03:29:18 Speaker 254: other thing, I can see why
03:29:20 Speaker 254: your your probably your numbers were
03:29:24 Speaker 254: weren't as high coming south because
03:29:26 Speaker 254: they know further ahead you're lowering
03:29:28 Speaker 256: to sixty. Anyway, I I just
03:29:31 Speaker 256: would say that I would agree
03:29:32 Speaker 256: with that concept. The Eighth Street,
03:29:34 Speaker 257: I think you said it currently
03:29:37 Speaker 257: right now it's eighty, but obviously
03:29:39 Speaker 257: if that area starts to develop,
03:29:41 Speaker 257: there may be pressure from the
03:29:43 Speaker 257: city of Owens Sound to reduce
03:29:45 Speaker 257: that speed in the future. Who
03:29:47 Speaker 188: knows, right? But as another example
03:29:49 Speaker 188: on Gray Road. Four in Maxwell,
03:29:52 Speaker 188: there's a public school there that,
03:29:56 Speaker 188: when lights are flashing, drops to
03:29:58 Speaker 188: forty on a county road, and
03:30:01 Speaker 188: that's sight lines are straight. But
03:30:04 Speaker 188: there is a bevel walking sidewalk
03:30:05 Speaker 188: that kids can walk into Maxwell,
03:30:07 Speaker 188: but that is an example of
03:30:11 Speaker 188: a county road where there's a
03:30:13 Speaker 188: school, and in flashing lights, it
03:30:14 Speaker 188: drops to forty, and it's fifty
03:30:17 Speaker 188: right now. Oh, and the intersection,
03:30:20 Speaker 188: I don't understand. Is is this
03:30:22 Speaker 188: going to be an intersection, or
03:30:24 Speaker 188: is going to be a huge
03:30:25 Speaker 188: turn into the property? Are you
03:30:28 Speaker 188: designing an intersection, or are you
03:30:30 Speaker 258: designing a proper turn into the
03:30:35 Speaker 258: school? Like you're building a road,
03:30:37 Speaker 258: but it's a road going one
03:30:39 Speaker 258: way. I I I have a
03:30:41 Speaker 258: little trouble supporting a resolution that
03:30:42 Speaker 258: we're not going to create an
03:30:43 Speaker 259: intersection to the east because that's
03:30:46 Speaker 227: not even in the plans. Like
03:30:48 Speaker 227: I don't understand from MTO's perspective,
03:30:50 Speaker 227: other than they just still want
03:30:52 Speaker 227: to see something develop in the.
03:30:58 Speaker 227: Meepert property, but obviously it's just
03:31:00 Speaker 227: a resolution. But I, I sort
03:31:04 Speaker 227: of see that's a bit of
03:31:04 Speaker 260: a stretch. But that's just my
03:31:08 Speaker 261: comments. Yeah, three, you Warden, the
03:31:11 Speaker 262: intersection would be a T intersection,
03:31:15 Speaker 262: basically to stop control, effectively as
03:31:17 Speaker 262: development occurs. That might change, and
03:31:22 Speaker 262: it might potentially be signalized, or
03:31:26 Speaker 262: there's been discussions around the vote
03:31:31 Speaker 262: as well. So all of those
03:31:36 Speaker 262: could be potential, depending on
03:31:40 Speaker 262: the long term focus of that.
03:31:44 Speaker 262: Long-term focus of that area. So
03:31:46 Speaker 262: at between eight and nine, and
03:31:52 Speaker 262: probably three or four, it's going
03:31:56 Speaker 262: to be a busy spot. School
03:31:59 Speaker 262: buses, people picking up their kids,
03:32:05 Speaker 262: dropping kids off. You know, somebody
03:32:07 Speaker 193: that's not familiar with that road,
03:32:09 Speaker 193: say they're only driving at all
03:32:11 Speaker 193: of a sudden, whoa! They see
03:32:13 Speaker 193: at eighty. It just reinforces the
03:32:14 Speaker 193: whole part going back to sixty,
03:32:16 Speaker 193: just because of those two times.
03:32:18 Speaker 193: that are busy times, maybe even
03:32:24 Speaker 263: lunchtime. If you're, Mr. Councillor Echols
03:32:28 Speaker 262: said it's it's it's sort of
03:32:30 Speaker 262: what has happened in the past
03:32:32 Speaker 262: as well, and it just sort
03:32:34 Speaker 262: of makes sense. Thank you, through
03:32:36 Speaker 262: your warden, and I think that's
03:32:37 Speaker 262: as Trevor's indicated. There's two distinctions
03:32:38 Speaker 262: here. One is the design speed
03:32:40 Speaker 262: and the construction design speed to
03:32:43 Speaker 262: make sure that the the road.
03:32:46 Speaker 262: and because Trevor indicated the crest
03:32:48 Speaker 262: of the road is causing sightline
03:32:50 Speaker 262: issues at that proposed intersection and
03:32:53 Speaker 262: as it currently stands until that
03:32:56 Speaker 262: those lands other lands around that
03:32:58 Speaker 262: develop out driver behaviour usually is
03:33:02 Speaker 262: that there's needs to be usually
03:33:05 Speaker 262: some visual cues outside of the
03:33:08 Speaker 262: posted speed limit to be able
03:33:10 Speaker 262: to slow down driver behaviour that's
03:33:12 Speaker 262: based on again what Trevor indicated
03:33:15 Speaker 262: from studies and results that that
03:33:20 Speaker 262: we've seen in the past. so
03:33:22 Speaker 262: there's there's a key distinction. What
03:33:24 Speaker 262: I'm hearing potentially from the comments
03:33:27 Speaker 262: so far, and just wanted to
03:33:30 Speaker 262: clarify, is the direction to continue
03:33:34 Speaker 262: to, as staff are recommending currently
03:33:36 Speaker 262: in this report, is to keep
03:33:37 Speaker 262: the design speed to construct that
03:33:38 Speaker 264: road at a 90 km/h design
03:33:42 Speaker 264: speed. But that I'm hearing that
03:33:43 Speaker 265: there's interest to maybe lower that
03:33:48 Speaker 265: supposed speed limit to 60 km/h,
03:33:50 Speaker 265: and so. Hour, and so just
03:33:52 Speaker 265: seeking clarification on that. If if
03:33:53 Speaker 265: there was a an amended motion
03:33:55 Speaker 266: or a motion to to being
03:34:01 Speaker 267: proposed on that piece, but the
03:34:03 Speaker 267: the part of that too is
03:34:04 Speaker 267: is right now the motion that's
03:34:06 Speaker 267: before council is to consider the
03:34:08 Speaker 268: design speed, which staff are recommending
03:34:11 Speaker 269: is 90 km/h design speed. Typically,
03:34:14 Speaker 270: as you may recall, we bring
03:34:17 Speaker 270: transportation services brings back to council
03:34:19 Speaker 270: suggestions or comments about reductions in
03:34:21 Speaker 271: design speeds. and then usually a
03:34:24 Speaker 271: subsequent bylaw revision to reduce those
03:34:27 Speaker 271: bylaw speeds. So that could be
03:34:29 Speaker 271: the direction in terms of considering
03:34:31 Speaker 271: at the next time we update
03:34:32 Speaker 271: that, because again, thinking from a
03:34:34 Speaker 271: timing perspective, if the direction is
03:34:35 Speaker 272: to do a 90 km/h design
03:34:38 Speaker 272: speed construction, we'd probably want that
03:34:41 Speaker 273: construction completed before we post at
03:34:48 Speaker 274: a 60 km/h design speed. So
03:34:51 Speaker 275: just making sure from a timing
03:34:54 Speaker 275: perspective and seeking clarity from council.
03:34:56 Speaker 205: What the direction would be with
03:34:58 Speaker 205: those factors that I just highlighted?
03:35:01 Speaker 205: Okay, thank you for that additional
03:35:03 Speaker 205: information. I'm going to go to
03:35:04 Speaker 205: Councillor Dobrine, and I will just
03:35:06 Speaker 205: look for any final hands because
03:35:08 Speaker 205: I did hear Councillor Vadi mention
03:35:17 Speaker 205: that he was interested in in
03:35:19 Speaker 205: proposing an amendment. So, so we'll
03:35:20 Speaker 276: go to Councillor Dobrine, and then
03:35:24 Speaker 276: over to Councillor Mackie, and then
03:35:25 Speaker 276: we'll see where we are about
03:35:27 Speaker 276: discussing any amendment. Thank you, and
03:35:29 Speaker 276: thank you both. It was a
03:35:31 Speaker 276: very detailed report. I had to
03:35:33 Speaker 276: read it a couple of times.
03:35:35 Speaker 276: In, but thank you. So, looking
03:35:37 Speaker 276: at that map, there are indications
03:35:38 Speaker 277: where you had study intersections, but
03:35:40 Speaker 84: they may not necessarily currently exist.
03:35:43 Speaker 84: And if I'm not mistaken, the
03:35:48 Speaker 84: report. said post-secondary school. So therefore,
03:35:50 Speaker 84: chances of there being buses are
03:35:51 Speaker 84: less because many in post-secondary institutions
03:35:52 Speaker 84: are driving themselves. So maybe you
03:35:54 Speaker 84: could clarify. Am I getting? It
03:35:56 Speaker 84: said post-secondary in the report. So
03:35:59 Speaker 84: is it? So is is it
03:36:02 Speaker 84: a secondary school? Is it a
03:36:06 Speaker 84: grade school? Thank you. That's my
03:36:07 Speaker 84: first question, if I may, Warden.
03:36:09 Speaker 84: Yes, thank you for that question,
03:36:11 Speaker 84: Councillor Devereen. My apologies if that
03:36:13 Speaker 84: was the case within the report.
03:36:15 Speaker 84: It should have certainly been secondary
03:36:18 Speaker 84: school. So these would be high
03:36:19 Speaker 84: school age students. Yeah. So there
03:36:21 Speaker 84: would be busing involved. Thank you
03:36:23 Speaker 84: for that clarification. Did you have
03:36:25 Speaker 84: a follow-up, Counselor Devere? Yes, that
03:36:27 Speaker 84: was my first question. The second
03:36:30 Speaker 84: question, then, now that I know
03:36:32 Speaker 84: that it is a secondary school
03:36:33 Speaker 278: or a community school, yes, there's
03:36:38 Speaker 278: going to be buses, there's going
03:36:42 Speaker 278: to be train lines, there's going
03:36:43 Speaker 278: to be increased traffic with people
03:36:45 Speaker 278: dropping off their children. I would,
03:36:47 Speaker 209: I would see in the future
03:36:49 Speaker 209: that there be, you know, a
03:36:53 Speaker 209: set of lights which. serves as
03:36:55 Speaker 84: a traffic calming measure as well.
03:36:58 Speaker 84: My concern with, and I totally
03:37:01 Speaker 84: support building it for the ninety.
03:37:05 Speaker 84: I have difficulties understanding why we
03:37:06 Speaker 84: we set a speed because people
03:37:08 Speaker 84: are going to speed, and so
03:37:10 Speaker 84: I actually do support a lower
03:37:12 Speaker 84: speed limit, and the people need
03:37:13 Speaker 84: to adjust their speed accordingly. And
03:37:17 Speaker 84: future stop or stop lights will
03:37:20 Speaker 84: help slow that down. But I
03:37:23 Speaker 84: do understand the need to build
03:37:25 Speaker 84: it at the ninety because of
03:37:26 Speaker 84: the lack of indications that there
03:37:27 Speaker 84: is a school coming up. And
03:37:30 Speaker 84: and those are my comments. I
03:37:32 Speaker 84: wanted to thank you and and
03:37:33 Speaker 84: thank you for clarifying that it
03:37:34 Speaker 84: is a secondary school. Thank you.
03:37:39 Speaker 84: Okay. Thank you. We're going to
03:37:40 Speaker 84: go to Councillor Markey. Thank you,
03:37:42 Speaker 84: Warden. Thank you, Becky. Thank you,
03:37:45 Speaker 84: Trevor. I'm not sure if Randy
03:37:48 Speaker 84: clarified things for me or made
03:37:51 Speaker 84: things more complicated, but I know
03:37:52 Speaker 84: I appreciate the effort. The design
03:37:54 Speaker 84: speed, the actual speed—I think we're
03:37:55 Speaker 84: getting caught up in that. What
03:37:58 Speaker 84: I guess my simple question is,
03:38:00 Speaker 84: Chair. But we talked about the
03:38:02 Speaker 84: the null, and on it actually
03:38:04 Speaker 84: shows that null on page what
03:38:06 Speaker 84: page fifty. six of seventy nine.
03:38:07 Speaker 84: The design speed of ninety kilometres
03:38:08 Speaker 84: will that eliminate that null? I
03:38:11 Speaker 84: know there was some talk about
03:38:12 Speaker 84: cost savings by reducing, but I
03:38:14 Speaker 84: mean, in a school zone, I'm
03:38:15 Speaker 84: not sure the the cut. We
03:38:16 Speaker 84: need to make sure the
03:38:19 Speaker 84: kids are safe for those people
03:38:22 Speaker 84: that are speeding. So we need
03:38:25 Speaker 84: that line of sight. So will
03:38:27 Speaker 279: the ninety kilometre design eliminate that
03:38:30 Speaker 279: null? So it's safer. I think
03:38:34 Speaker 279: is my question. Yeah, basically the
03:38:36 Speaker 279: noel the purpose of the ninety
03:38:40 Speaker 280: kilometre design speed is strictly to
03:38:46 Speaker 281: reduce the hill and bring it
03:38:49 Speaker 281: down. Effectively, the rest of the
03:38:51 Speaker 281: road is sixty, eighty, ninety, one
03:38:52 Speaker 281: hundred. The design speed doesn't matter
03:38:54 Speaker 281: in the rest of the road.
03:38:55 Speaker 205: It's really just the hill, the
03:38:58 Speaker 205: crest of that hill. Yes. Exactly.
03:39:00 Speaker 205: Yes. Okay. So, okay, we'll go
03:39:02 Speaker 205: to Councillor Greg, and we'll see
03:39:04 Speaker 205: see what's going to happen after
03:39:06 Speaker 205: that, Councillor Greg. Thank you. And
03:39:07 Speaker 205: I would be able to just
03:39:09 Speaker 205: confirm the rationale for changing that
03:39:11 Speaker 282: section to the south to a
03:39:14 Speaker 282: 60 kilometres an hour was because
03:39:15 Speaker 283: of the sight lines that existed
03:39:20 Speaker 284: at the intersection of Superior Street
03:39:23 Speaker 284: and 28th Avenue. We did that
03:39:25 Speaker 284: about seven or eight years ago,
03:39:27 Speaker 284: at the city. that was the
03:39:34 Speaker 284: the complete rationale for doing so.
03:39:35 Speaker 58: It's mentioned in the report. The
03:39:39 Speaker 58: impediment is the vertical curve, and
03:39:40 Speaker 58: it's a design speed for eighty.
03:39:44 Speaker 58: I can't help but think there
03:39:48 Speaker 58: are other locations in the county.
03:39:49 Speaker 58: One of them is a few
03:39:54 Speaker 58: miles southwest of Desborough on Gray
03:39:56 Speaker 58: Road three, where many years back
03:39:59 Speaker 58: it was placed as a sixty
03:40:01 Speaker 58: kilometre an hour zone. It goes
03:40:02 Speaker 58: over a. leg of the Soggin
03:40:05 Speaker 58: River at that location. The rationale
03:40:06 Speaker 285: at the time was because of
03:40:10 Speaker 285: a driveway that existed at the
03:40:11 Speaker 58: northernmost portion of that 60 zone,
03:40:17 Speaker 58: and the county didn't want to
03:40:21 Speaker 58: incur the cost of cutting the
03:40:23 Speaker 58: hill down to for appropriate sightlines.
03:40:27 Speaker 58: So it's a 60 for probably
03:40:28 Speaker 58: a mile through as you go
03:40:32 Speaker 58: down that hill. Most people abide
03:40:34 Speaker 58: by it. Councillor Echo's car might
03:40:37 Speaker 58: fly through there a little quick.
03:40:38 Speaker 58: The EVs really motor. But there
03:40:42 Speaker 58: are instances like that where cost
03:40:44 Speaker 58: was an issue back in the
03:40:45 Speaker 58: day. It was several years ago.
03:40:47 Speaker 58: That was that was the case,
03:40:49 Speaker 58: and it remains a sixty. I,
03:40:50 Speaker 58: I mean, that's open highway. This
03:40:52 Speaker 58: is a portion of an urban
03:40:54 Speaker 286: boundary road. I don't, I cannot
03:41:03 Speaker 286: understand why we certainly wouldn't entertain
03:41:05 Speaker 286: making it a sixty, and it
03:41:06 Speaker 287: already has a. design speed of
03:41:10 Speaker 287: eighty at that vertical impediment. I
03:41:11 Speaker 287: think behaviours are going to change.
03:41:12 Speaker 188: I'm kind of with Councillor Del
03:41:15 Speaker 188: Green, who's like, "Why do we
03:41:19 Speaker 188: continue to construct to facilitate faster
03:41:21 Speaker 188: vehicle movements in areas where we
03:41:24 Speaker 188: shouldn't be facilitating it?" Yeah, the
03:41:26 Speaker 188: design. If it was already at
03:41:28 Speaker 188: ninety or a hundred, and we
03:41:30 Speaker 188: move it to sixty, that's even
03:41:32 Speaker 188: safer. But it's a design speed
03:41:34 Speaker 257: of eighty now. We could post
03:41:37 Speaker 257: it at fifty in the future
03:41:39 Speaker 254: when it goes to the city.
03:41:41 Speaker 254: under control, sixty I think is
03:41:43 Speaker 254: where it should be. It's just
03:41:50 Speaker 288: a continuum of. We did nothing
03:41:52 Speaker 193: more on Twenty Eighth Avenue between
03:41:55 Speaker 193: Superior Street and Eighth Avenue, other
03:41:57 Speaker 193: than probably two signs to make
03:41:59 Speaker 193: people aware that this was no
03:42:01 Speaker 193: longer an eighty zone. It's now
03:42:02 Speaker 193: a sixty, and we haven't had
03:42:04 Speaker 193: any issues. So I struggle with
03:42:07 Speaker 193: a huge expenditure. Whether it's the
03:42:08 Speaker 193: county taxpayer paying for an upgrade.
03:42:11 Speaker 193: Payer paying for an upgrade to
03:42:13 Speaker 193: the road to a higher design
03:42:14 Speaker 193: speed, or the school board, which
03:42:17 Speaker 193: would be even worse. The amount
03:42:19 Speaker 193: of costs that have been dragged
03:42:21 Speaker 193: out of the school board to
03:42:23 Speaker 193: be able to move this project
03:42:26 Speaker 193: forward to get to where we
03:42:27 Speaker 289: are even now. Now those are
03:42:32 Speaker 290: funds that aren't going into music
03:42:35 Speaker 290: programmemes, athletics, other complementary programmemes of
03:42:36 Speaker 290: schools. It's just lost in bureaucracy.
03:42:38 Speaker 290: So I think we certainly should
03:42:39 Speaker 291: be entertaining sixty at the minimum,
03:42:44 Speaker 291: and I'm not convinced. at the
03:42:45 Speaker 291: location why a large expenditure does
03:42:46 Speaker 291: need to occur to make it
03:42:47 Speaker 291: a higher design speed as well.
03:42:49 Speaker 292: Okay, is there a comment? Yeah,
03:42:52 Speaker 293: just to speak to that. So,
03:42:57 Speaker 294: one of the elements that does
03:43:00 Speaker 295: kind of make this different than
03:43:02 Speaker 295: maybe the one in Desborough, the
03:43:03 Speaker 295: one in Desborough being a single
03:43:04 Speaker 62: entrance or so, a couple and.
03:43:11 Speaker 62: Couple, enter exits a day, maybe.
03:43:12 Speaker 62: Here we have a situation where
03:43:25 Speaker 62: we have buses, cars, you know,
03:43:26 Speaker 62: hundreds of vehicles coming in and
03:44:26 Speaker 62: out of that intersection each day.
03:44:28 Speaker 62: So again, it's different level of
03:44:29 Speaker 62: risk associated with those two. That's
03:44:30 Speaker 62: the only part I can speak
03:44:53 Speaker 62: to, I guess, in terms of
03:44:54 Speaker 284: your question. Okay, thank you. Okay,
03:44:57 Speaker 284: we'll do another comment, and then
03:45:01 Speaker 296: I'm going to return to Councillor
03:45:03 Speaker 296: Baddie's comment about being interested in.
03:45:05 Speaker 296: an amendment. So it's where that
03:45:06 Speaker 296: hill is, and where the proposed
03:45:09 Speaker 296: entrance to the school, the distance
03:45:10 Speaker 296: there isn't enough coming up over
03:45:12 Speaker 296: that hill for sightlines, and the
03:45:14 Speaker 297: concern that traffic turning too fast
03:45:19 Speaker 297: as they come around the corner
03:45:20 Speaker 297: and head south. What about going
03:45:22 Speaker 297: to the other side? Just flip
03:45:24 Speaker 298: the building. around and put the
03:45:27 Speaker 298: intersection put the intersection at the
03:45:28 Speaker 298: south part of the property. Or
03:45:30 Speaker 298: does that eliminate that house? Is
03:45:32 Speaker 299: that why they designed it that
03:45:35 Speaker 299: way? If if we were doing
03:45:37 Speaker 299: this in the rural areas and
03:45:39 Speaker 299: doing a severance, that entrance would
03:45:40 Speaker 299: have to meet right on a
03:45:42 Speaker 299: hill. Nope, can't have a severance
03:45:43 Speaker 300: here because. or move where you
03:45:48 Speaker 262: want your entrance to get that.
03:45:50 Speaker 262: Is that a solution? And no
03:45:51 Speaker 262: construction would be needed. It increases
03:45:53 Speaker 262: the distance, and just tell the
03:45:55 Speaker 262: school board turn your building around,
03:45:58 Speaker 262: put your main entrance onto the
03:45:59 Speaker 262: south side, so that you get
03:46:07 Speaker 262: a lot more. And that settles
03:46:08 Speaker 301: a bit of climate control because
03:46:13 Speaker 301: now the entrance and everything's on
03:46:15 Speaker 302: the north side of the building,
03:46:17 Speaker 303: and in the winter that's usually
03:46:21 Speaker 304: the coldest part of. the building.
03:46:23 Speaker 304: I just a thought. Okay, the
03:46:26 Speaker 304: CEO would like to offer a
03:46:33 Speaker 304: comment, and then I'll look back
03:46:35 Speaker 305: to the lectern. And staff may
03:46:37 Speaker 305: have to correct me if I'm
03:46:39 Speaker 62: if I'm incorrect on this this
03:46:50 Speaker 62: this comment in response to Councillor
03:46:51 Speaker 56: Echo's the question. I believe that
03:46:54 Speaker 56: was was proposed early on in
03:46:57 Speaker 56: in the pro. Early on in
03:46:58 Speaker 56: in the process, and I don't
03:47:03 Speaker 56: know the exact reasons or variety
03:47:05 Speaker 306: of reasons why that was maybe
03:47:07 Speaker 307: not not a desired location. But
03:47:11 Speaker 307: I know that that was that
03:47:12 Speaker 308: was discussed early on in terms
03:47:16 Speaker 308: of a proposed potential solution to
03:47:17 Speaker 205: try to again address some of
03:47:20 Speaker 205: the the concerns that are being
03:47:22 Speaker 205: raised by transportation services staff at
03:47:24 Speaker 205: the moment. Yeah, just to add
03:47:26 Speaker 205: to what. CA CA Oshers or
03:47:29 Speaker 205: has has noted there, I think
03:47:30 Speaker 205: yes, we've had significant discussions with
03:47:31 Speaker 205: city staff on on this matter
03:47:35 Speaker 205: and sort of where those those
03:47:36 Speaker 205: roads should align and locate. And
03:47:38 Speaker 205: I think one of the crux
03:47:40 Speaker 309: of the concerns from from their
03:47:44 Speaker 207: perspective was, as you can see
03:47:50 Speaker 310: again in the photo, that area
03:47:52 Speaker 311: north of of where the orange
03:47:55 Speaker 84: is, those lands are are vacant
03:47:57 Speaker 84: at this stage and are still
03:48:00 Speaker 312: to be developed. And so there
03:48:04 Speaker 312: was the question as well of
03:48:05 Speaker 312: we would need. access to those
03:48:07 Speaker 312: lands, and ideally we wouldn't have
03:48:09 Speaker 312: sole access from the from the
03:48:11 Speaker 312: highway. So that was certainly part
03:48:14 Speaker 312: of the larger discussion there as
03:48:16 Speaker 313: well. Okay, so with that, I'm
03:48:20 Speaker 314: going to look back to the
03:48:23 Speaker 314: reference to an amendment, Councillor Body.
03:48:25 Speaker 315: Was there an amendment that you
03:48:27 Speaker 315: wish to propose? Given all the
03:48:29 Speaker 130: discussion that is around, I'm going
03:48:32 Speaker 130: to put it out, and we
03:48:34 Speaker 130: can vote it up or down.
03:48:35 Speaker 130: It's retired. Bottle it down. We're
03:48:37 Speaker 130: talking about design here, but I
03:48:38 Speaker 130: will move amendment of point three
03:48:39 Speaker 130: of the recommendation to reduce the
03:48:41 Speaker 130: design speed from ninety kilometres an
03:48:43 Speaker 130: hour to sixty kilometres an hour.
03:48:45 Speaker 130: I think if I've got it
03:48:47 Speaker 316: right, I don't see it up
03:48:49 Speaker 130: on the screen. But okay, we'll
03:48:52 Speaker 130: just need to switch the screens
03:48:54 Speaker 130: around for you. Sorry, working on
03:48:56 Speaker 130: two computers here. Just give us
03:48:57 Speaker 130: a moment. Okay, we're just switching
03:49:01 Speaker 130: it over to the deputy clerk,
03:49:03 Speaker 130: who is just typing it up
03:49:04 Speaker 130: so it can be shown on
03:49:06 Speaker 130: the screen. Okay. So it reads
03:49:08 Speaker 130: that the motion be amended to
03:49:10 Speaker 130: amend clause three to reflect the
03:49:12 Speaker 130: design speed of 60 kilometres per
03:49:14 Speaker 130: hour along Gray Road Five in
03:49:16 Speaker 130: front of the new school. Is
03:49:18 Speaker 130: that the way that you wanted
03:49:20 Speaker 130: to capture, Councillor Body? Before I
03:49:22 Speaker 130: confirm that, I just want to
03:49:23 Speaker 130: clarify it. Currently, would be at
03:49:25 Speaker 130: eighty kilometres an hour if left
03:49:27 Speaker 130: alone. Then I'd like my motion
03:49:30 Speaker 130: to say the motion be amended
03:49:31 Speaker 130: to amend clause three to reflect
03:49:32 Speaker 130: a design speed of eighty kilometres
03:49:34 Speaker 130: an hour. Thank you. Okay, so
03:49:36 Speaker 130: it reads as I've just read
03:49:36 Speaker 130: out with eighty kilometres per hour
03:49:37 Speaker 130: for design instead of sixty. Okay,
03:49:39 Speaker 317: so that motion has been moved
03:49:42 Speaker 317: by Councillor Body. Is there a
03:49:44 Speaker 317: seconder for that amendment? it's seconded
03:49:46 Speaker 317: by Councillor Gregg. It's now on
03:49:49 Speaker 62: the floor for discussion. Just this
03:49:58 Speaker 62: amendment is on the floor for
03:50:00 Speaker 318: discussion, Councillor Dobrin. Just to clarify
03:50:03 Speaker 318: that it says along Gray Road
03:50:04 Speaker 318: Five in front of the new
03:50:06 Speaker 02: school, and the original resolution said
03:50:09 Speaker 02: in the area of the proposed
03:50:10 Speaker 02: intersection. And I want to make
03:50:12 Speaker 02: sure that they're one and the
03:50:15 Speaker 02: same. Okay. No, and. as long
03:50:19 Speaker 02: as we have the same outcome,
03:50:21 Speaker 02: yes, we are speaking about the
03:50:22 Speaker 319: same stretch of road. Okay, from
03:50:26 Speaker 319: start to finish. Okay, Councillor Mackey.
03:50:28 Speaker 319: Thank you, Warden, and through you
03:50:30 Speaker 319: to Trevor. This proposed amendment, Trevor,
03:50:32 Speaker 319: would pose a safety concern from
03:50:33 Speaker 319: your department's standpoint. Yeah, in my
03:50:35 Speaker 319: professional opinion, it would. Effectively, the
03:50:37 Speaker 319: amount of vehicles that still exceed
03:50:39 Speaker 319: eighty, I'd be concerned about. Okay,
03:50:46 Speaker 319: over to Councillor Dobrin. Just to
03:50:48 Speaker 62: follow up on that, then, would
03:51:18 Speaker 62: it be a benefit to also
03:51:20 Speaker 62: indicate our desire to lower the
03:51:21 Speaker 320: speed limit to sixty? Would that
03:51:26 Speaker 320: resolve the safety concerns? And through
03:51:28 Speaker 320: you, Warden. And three wouldn't. It
03:51:33 Speaker 320: would help to mitigate.
03:51:46 Speaker 320: It wouldn't
03:51:52 Speaker 320: eliminate them. It would probably reduce
03:51:53 Speaker 320: them about half, maybe a little
03:51:55 Speaker 320: more than half. But like based
03:51:57 Speaker 320: on our numbers, we'd have about
03:51:58 Speaker 320: thirty percent exceeding eighty right now.
03:51:59 Speaker 320: Based on historical trends and data,
03:52:00 Speaker 321: it could get down to maybe
03:52:04 Speaker 321: ten to fifteen percent, kind of
03:52:07 Speaker 321: like a bare minimum. If we
03:52:08 Speaker 321: were to post it to that,
03:52:10 Speaker 322: we would see the ninety probably
03:52:12 Speaker 322: get pretty close to zero. We
03:52:14 Speaker 323: get pretty close to zero. So,
03:52:17 Speaker 323: posting at a 60 with a
03:52:18 Speaker 323: 90 design speed, you almost eliminate
03:52:20 Speaker 24: the risk. Versus 80, you would
03:52:23 Speaker 24: still see perceived risk. Okay, we'll
03:52:24 Speaker 24: go to Councillor Greg. And I'd
03:52:28 Speaker 24: like to add an amendment to
03:52:30 Speaker 24: that. That staff report back to
03:52:31 Speaker 186: Council on a reducing of the
03:52:37 Speaker 324: speed limit to 60 kilometres an
03:52:44 Speaker 325: hour for that zone. Let's go
03:52:46 Speaker 326: through the person and do the
03:52:49 Speaker 326: amendment next. I I want to
03:52:51 Speaker 326: I want to put it here
03:52:53 Speaker 326: now because it is associated with
03:52:55 Speaker 326: the safety concern and the conversation.
03:52:56 Speaker 327: I think so that it's acknowledged
03:52:59 Speaker 327: that it's it's you know pertinent
03:53:01 Speaker 327: in both at the same time.
03:53:04 Speaker 327: Okay, so Councillor Greg, you are
03:53:05 Speaker 327: proposing an amendment to the amendment,
03:53:07 Speaker 327: and I appreciate although the report
03:53:09 Speaker 327: is all about. design speed, we
03:53:11 Speaker 327: can hear that everybody is making
03:53:13 Speaker 327: that connection about what the final
03:53:15 Speaker 327: speed limit might be. So I
03:53:17 Speaker 327: appreciate that. I do believe that
03:53:18 Speaker 327: is part of what we are
03:53:20 Speaker 327: here to discuss. I don't think
03:53:22 Speaker 327: it's a separate matter. So we'll
03:53:24 Speaker 327: carry on with these amendments to
03:53:25 Speaker 327: the main motion. This is an
03:53:27 Speaker 327: amendment to the to the amendment
03:53:29 Speaker 327: that the primary amendment be amended
03:53:32 Speaker 327: to request a staff report on
03:53:34 Speaker 327: a proposed speed limit of sixty
03:53:39 Speaker 327: kilometres per hour. Is there a
03:53:41 Speaker 327: seconder for that amendment? to the
03:53:42 Speaker 327: original amendment, seconded by Councillor Debrine.
03:53:43 Speaker 327: Okay, so it is now on
03:53:51 Speaker 327: the floor for discussion, and it
03:53:52 Speaker 327: is up there on the screen.
03:53:54 Speaker 328: So we are now discussing that
03:53:57 Speaker 328: the primary amendment be amended to
03:53:58 Speaker 328: request a staff report on a
03:54:00 Speaker 329: proposed speed limit of sixty kilometres
03:54:03 Speaker 329: per hour on Grey. I realize
03:54:04 Speaker 329: it's hard to sometimes discuss one
03:54:05 Speaker 329: piece without discussing the holistic picture,
03:54:06 Speaker 329: but we'll have to try to
03:54:08 Speaker 330: stay a process and just focus
03:54:11 Speaker 330: in on this particular adjustment that.
03:54:16 Speaker 330: has been proposed, and we will
03:54:18 Speaker 330: go just before I go to
03:54:20 Speaker 330: Councillor McQueen. I had I I
03:54:23 Speaker 330: wasn't sure if that was a
03:54:23 Speaker 330: stretch, Councillor Ericksen, or a hand
03:54:26 Speaker 330: up. So it was a hand
03:54:29 Speaker 330: up. So we're going to begin
03:54:30 Speaker 205: with Councillor Ericksen, and then over
03:54:33 Speaker 205: to Councillor McQueen. So just for
03:54:36 Speaker 205: clarity, we have an amendment on
03:54:36 Speaker 205: the floor, and now we have
03:54:38 Speaker 205: another amendment, but it's not amending
03:54:42 Speaker 205: the amendment. So. It is, yeah.
03:54:44 Speaker 205: It it is actually an amendment
03:54:45 Speaker 205: to the amendment. So it it
03:54:47 Speaker 205: it is not an amendment to
03:54:48 Speaker 205: the main motion. It is an
03:54:51 Speaker 205: amendment to the amendment. I know
03:54:52 Speaker 205: it's it's challenging, but that's what
03:54:57 Speaker 205: we're looking at. If this mo,
03:54:59 Speaker 205: if this particular amendment to the
03:55:01 Speaker 331: the amendment passes, then we will
03:55:06 Speaker 332: carry on to discuss Councillor Body's
03:55:09 Speaker 333: amendment with this embodied into it
03:55:11 Speaker 334: or not, depending on how this
03:55:14 Speaker 334: goes. Okay, so with that, then
03:55:16 Speaker 334: we'll go to Councillor McQueen. Thank
03:55:17 Speaker 334: you, Madam Warden. Is it possible
03:55:19 Speaker 334: that we could pull up the
03:55:20 Speaker 334: picture in the report? The reason
03:55:32 Speaker 334: I say that it does do
03:55:34 Speaker 205: a perspective on that hill—is that
03:55:37 Speaker 205: possible? Just kind of, I have
03:55:39 Speaker 205: a question. Okay, so you're requesting
03:55:41 Speaker 205: the diagram that was in the
03:55:43 Speaker 205: report. Oops, sorry. Sorry, Madam Warden,
03:55:44 Speaker 205: to the to Trevor from that
03:55:48 Speaker 205: viewpoint of that pitch. From that
03:55:49 Speaker 205: viewpoint of that picture, is that
03:55:50 Speaker 205: looking? It's looking south. And right
03:55:55 Speaker 205: now, that is looking. And I
03:55:59 Speaker 205: presume the property. Or maybe you
03:56:00 Speaker 205: can help me. Where that intersection
03:56:03 Speaker 205: would be is at Roach Trees,
03:56:05 Speaker 205: at or from a design speed
03:56:07 Speaker 205: of 90. So right now, I
03:56:08 Speaker 205: think it was it was pointed
03:56:10 Speaker 205: out that right now that's a
03:56:11 Speaker 205: design speed of of 80 currently.
03:56:14 Speaker 205: So that wouldn't change. And also
03:56:15 Speaker 205: the amendment is to have a
03:56:18 Speaker 205: report about reducing that speed, as
03:56:20 Speaker 205: you see it posted there, of
03:56:22 Speaker 205: 80 to 60. My my other
03:56:24 Speaker 205: question, so that's for clarity. My
03:56:25 Speaker 205: question is, is is that Roach
03:56:27 Speaker 205: Trees where the Is is that
03:56:29 Speaker 205: road trees where that entrance will
03:56:32 Speaker 205: be, and is if if that
03:56:39 Speaker 205: other lands get developed, how does
03:56:41 Speaker 205: that affect the design and the
03:56:42 Speaker 205: speed of that road? Because it's
03:56:44 Speaker 205: more of a sightline issue going
03:56:46 Speaker 205: south, but is it a sightline
03:56:48 Speaker 205: issue going north as well? Thank
03:56:49 Speaker 205: you. Ah, yeah, three, you warden.
03:56:51 Speaker 137: So in terms of where. the
03:56:54 Speaker 137: entrance is, right, basically it's not
03:56:56 Speaker 137: visible in that drawing. It is
03:56:58 Speaker 137: not past the trees. So actually,
03:57:00 Speaker 137: this side of the trees, you
03:57:01 Speaker 137: kind of see the almost the
03:57:06 Speaker 137: greenish, the most green tree in
03:57:08 Speaker 137: the middle. That's a separate row
03:57:10 Speaker 137: of trees, and it's kind of
03:57:13 Speaker 335: out in front of the there,
03:57:44 Speaker 46: but it is down below that
03:57:48 Speaker 46: hill. The other element with this,
03:57:51 Speaker 46: the photo is taken obviously from
03:57:53 Speaker 46: on top of a vehicle with
03:57:55 Speaker 46: the camera. With the cameras, so
03:57:57 Speaker 46: again, the sight line from the
03:57:59 Speaker 46: camera is about a metre higher
03:58:01 Speaker 46: than the actual height that we
03:58:02 Speaker 46: we're up to. So, two parts
03:58:05 Speaker 46: to play here. Even in this
03:58:07 Speaker 46: image, you can't see the entrance,
03:58:10 Speaker 46: and there is sort of a
03:58:14 Speaker 46: pseudo field entrance in that location
03:58:15 Speaker 46: right now. And yeah, when you
03:58:18 Speaker 336: basically drive on that, you don't
03:58:22 Speaker 58: really see anything till about probably
03:58:24 Speaker 58: about where the eighty kilometre designs
03:58:27 Speaker 58: be or like the posted speed
03:58:31 Speaker 58: sign is in that image. The
03:58:32 Speaker 58: speed sign isn't that image. Just
03:58:36 Speaker 58: when you see the approximate driveway.
03:58:39 Speaker 58: Well, I get or for the
03:58:41 Speaker 58: northbound too. There is no sightline
03:58:45 Speaker 58: issue from the northbound perspective. Just
03:58:48 Speaker 324: follow up on that. So, if
03:58:53 Speaker 324: that was brought to the design
03:58:55 Speaker 199: speed that you're talking about, from
03:58:59 Speaker 199: the if you were sitting in
03:59:01 Speaker 199: a car at that spot, a
03:59:04 Speaker 199: metre and a half down from
03:59:06 Speaker 199: where that's taken, you would see,
03:59:08 Speaker 199: you could see the whole road.
03:59:11 Speaker 199: What would you see? You can
03:59:12 Speaker 199: effectively potentially see the road in
03:59:18 Speaker 58: the distance, probably not. But as
03:59:23 Speaker 58: you come across there, yeah, it'll
03:59:24 Speaker 58: slowly open up. You'll be able
03:59:26 Speaker 58: to see farther away than closer
03:59:31 Speaker 58: out first. Kind of where that
03:59:35 Speaker 58: large tree line is is about
03:59:38 Speaker 58: 400 metres from the intersection. And
03:59:45 Speaker 58: if again, if the intersection was
03:59:52 Speaker 58: in that location, you would be
03:59:55 Speaker 58: able to see it and then
03:59:58 Speaker 58: be sufficient stop time or stopping
03:59:59 Speaker 58: distance. Yes, and with if it
04:00:03 Speaker 58: was at that farther distance on
04:00:04 Speaker 58: the south side, you well like
04:00:06 Speaker 58: that you could accommodate with an
04:00:14 Speaker 205: eighty as well. But where it's
04:00:18 Speaker 205: being proposed, it would need to
04:00:19 Speaker 205: be a ninety at the north
04:00:20 Speaker 205: limit of it. Okay, so we're
04:00:22 Speaker 205: still on the amendment to the
04:00:25 Speaker 205: amendment. We'll go to Councillor Kenner.
04:00:26 Speaker 337: Thank you, Madam Warden, and you've
04:00:31 Speaker 337: quoted research from. Sweden. Is there
04:00:33 Speaker 337: any research to indicate the effect
04:00:35 Speaker 337: an improved sightline would have on
04:00:36 Speaker 337: drivers? And what I'm getting at
04:00:38 Speaker 337: is, would they speed up to
04:00:40 Speaker 337: pass a slow-moving vehicle because they
04:00:41 Speaker 337: had a more favourable sightline? Ah,
04:00:42 Speaker 337: in terms of sightlines, there a
04:00:43 Speaker 337: lot. Well, depending on the driver,
04:00:44 Speaker 337: really. There would likely be all
04:00:46 Speaker 62: of the kind of yellow dash
04:00:54 Speaker 62: lines in that that would indicate
04:00:55 Speaker 62: safe passing zones would be built
04:00:58 Speaker 205: to the design speed of the
04:01:01 Speaker 205: location. And typically, on most of
04:01:04 Speaker 205: our roads, we go to a
04:01:11 Speaker 331: 90 kilometre design speed for centreline
04:01:14 Speaker 331: measure or yellow lines. Basically, the
04:01:15 Speaker 84: chance would be coming off the
04:01:18 Speaker 84: edge or end of the intersection.
04:01:20 Speaker 84: There's always a risk to someone
04:01:23 Speaker 84: if, say, even Say you've been,
04:01:26 Speaker 84: might be someone that's been following
04:01:29 Speaker 84: someone that's going slow on the
04:01:30 Speaker 84: highway, and they're getting overly agitated.
04:01:32 Speaker 84: They might immediately try to make
04:01:35 Speaker 84: a quick pass. The likelihood of
04:01:36 Speaker 84: someone being able to make a
04:01:38 Speaker 84: pass before the proposed entrance location
04:01:40 Speaker 84: is, unless they're very agitated and
04:01:43 Speaker 84: in a major rush, I don't
04:01:45 Speaker 338: expect to start a pass until
04:01:51 Speaker 338: they're over that hill and can
04:01:53 Speaker 339: see. Otherwise, they're making a pass
04:01:56 Speaker 339: in a spot they can't see
04:01:58 Speaker 339: over the crest of the hill.
04:02:00 Speaker 340: Yeah. Okay. Let's see then. Okay,
04:02:02 Speaker 340: I don't see any further hands
04:02:09 Speaker 340: up. Making sure on the screen,
04:02:10 Speaker 340: on the virtual screen as well.
04:02:12 Speaker 340: No, no further hands up on
04:02:14 Speaker 340: this amendment to the amendment. So
04:02:15 Speaker 340: I'm going to call the question
04:02:17 Speaker 340: now on the amendment to the
04:02:18 Speaker 340: amendment, which is that the primary
04:02:20 Speaker 340: amendment be amended to request a
04:02:22 Speaker 340: staff report on a proposed speed
04:02:23 Speaker 340: limit of 60 kilometres per hour
04:02:25 Speaker 340: on Gray Road 5 in this
04:02:26 Speaker 340: location. All those in favour. Okay,
04:02:28 Speaker 340: that is carried. Okay, so we'll
04:02:30 Speaker 340: take a moment to adjust the
04:02:31 Speaker 46: original amendment, and then we will
04:02:36 Speaker 46: continue with that discussion. Okay, so
04:02:41 Speaker 46: it. Okay, so the the amendment
04:02:43 Speaker 46: to the main motion now reads
04:02:45 Speaker 341: that the main motion be amended
04:02:50 Speaker 341: by changing clause three to reduce
04:02:51 Speaker 62: the design speed from 90 kilometres
04:03:13 Speaker 62: per hour to 80 kilometres per
04:03:14 Speaker 62: hour in front. of the new
04:03:16 Speaker 62: school, and that a stop report
04:03:18 Speaker 62: be brought forward to a proposed
04:03:19 Speaker 130: on a proposed speed limit of
04:03:22 Speaker 130: 60 kilometres per hour on Gray
04:03:23 Speaker 130: Road Five at this location. That
04:03:24 Speaker 130: is now what we're discussing. Any
04:03:27 Speaker 130: further discussion on this amendment? We'll
04:03:29 Speaker 130: go to Councillor Eccles. So unclear
04:03:31 Speaker 130: by going to leaving it at
04:03:32 Speaker 342: an 80 kilometre design, which it
04:03:34 Speaker 342: is at the present moment. been
04:03:36 Speaker 343: approved. The county would not need
04:03:38 Speaker 343: to do any work on this
04:03:40 Speaker 343: road, minimal. But they put it
04:03:42 Speaker 344: to a ninety-kilometre design. We're going
04:03:44 Speaker 345: to have to cut, tear, and
04:03:46 Speaker 345: somewhere around half a million. You
04:03:47 Speaker 346: were thinking? Yeah, through you, Warden.
04:03:50 Speaker 346: There is construction works that have
04:03:51 Speaker 346: to occur regardless. There's new lanes,
04:03:53 Speaker 346: curb, but in terms of actual
04:03:55 Speaker 347: road construction, there would be no
04:03:57 Speaker 347: excavation. So effectively, they would they
04:03:58 Speaker 347: would take out the excavated, replace
04:04:00 Speaker 347: the granular material, the asphalt, and
04:04:01 Speaker 347: construct the new road, but at
04:04:03 Speaker 347: the same grade that it currently
04:04:05 Speaker 347: exists. And those lanes, turning lanes,
04:04:06 Speaker 348: whatever you want that are going
04:04:11 Speaker 348: into the school, would. be at
04:04:13 Speaker 348: the developer's cost, correct? Yeah. So
04:04:15 Speaker 348: by leaving it at an eighty-kilometre
04:04:17 Speaker 349: design, the budgetary impact is going
04:04:21 Speaker 349: to be extremely minimal for the
04:04:28 Speaker 350: county. Yeah. Okay. By putting it
04:04:30 Speaker 351: to a ninety. we were probably
04:04:32 Speaker 351: going to be in for. Depending
04:04:34 Speaker 351: if those gas lines are in
04:04:36 Speaker 351: the right spot, and the school
04:04:37 Speaker 351: has tested them, sit there in
04:04:39 Speaker 62: the right spot, we're probably into
04:05:04 Speaker 62: this for a half a million.
04:05:05 Speaker 352: Someone would be. It wouldn't necessarily
04:05:22 Speaker 352: be us. Typically, those would be
04:05:23 Speaker 193: the result, or the development would
04:05:25 Speaker 193: pay for those sort of charges,
04:05:28 Speaker 193: unless they. Those sort of charges,
04:05:30 Speaker 193: unless there was some sort of
04:05:31 Speaker 193: potential agreement that was done at
04:05:34 Speaker 193: the side of that. But okay,
04:05:35 Speaker 193: and just just for the record,
04:05:37 Speaker 193: too, just I think if you
04:05:40 Speaker 193: can just make sure you've answered
04:05:41 Speaker 193: fully to the original question before
04:05:43 Speaker 193: there was that second question added
04:05:46 Speaker 193: on, just because you didn't have
04:05:49 Speaker 193: your mic on at this at
04:05:51 Speaker 193: the time, so we just want
04:05:53 Speaker 193: to make sure everybody heard the
04:05:55 Speaker 193: response that wouldn't be sitting in
04:05:57 Speaker 193: the room. Thank you. Yeah. So,
04:05:59 Speaker 193: in terms of the extra cost,
04:06:01 Speaker 193: there would be no extra cost
04:06:03 Speaker 193: to to the school board for
04:06:08 Speaker 193: constructing it above or beyond what
04:06:10 Speaker 193: they've already constructed. Okay. So we're
04:06:12 Speaker 193: going to go to Councillor Greg
04:06:14 Speaker 353: next. I would just like to
04:06:17 Speaker 354: add. It was noted about passing
04:06:22 Speaker 355: notations or delineation on that. Many
04:06:25 Speaker 355: in this room were part of
04:06:27 Speaker 355: a decision to eliminate passing from
04:06:29 Speaker 356: Rockford to Minnetonka Corners on Gray
04:06:32 Speaker 356: Road 18. So, if you really
04:06:34 Speaker 356: want to be concerned about safety,
04:06:38 Speaker 356: you can make further decisions that
04:06:39 Speaker 193: enhance people's safety. And this would
04:06:43 Speaker 193: be one block where you could
04:06:45 Speaker 193: consider down the road just removing
04:06:47 Speaker 193: any delineations on passing options, no
04:06:49 Speaker 193: different than recent decision that has
04:06:51 Speaker 193: been made in this room. Thanks.
04:06:53 Speaker 193: Okay. All right. Yes. Sorry. Go
04:06:56 Speaker 193: ahead, Mr. Arten. I was just
04:06:58 Speaker 193: going to mention. Usually, once we
04:06:59 Speaker 193: reduce down to sixty, typically there's
04:07:01 Speaker 193: generally no passing in any sixty
04:07:04 Speaker 193: or below speed limit zones. Anyway.
04:07:06 Speaker 193: Okay. Thank you. So I don't
04:07:07 Speaker 193: see any further hands up. Then
04:07:10 Speaker 193: so we are now voting on
04:07:11 Speaker 193: the amendment to the main motion
04:07:13 Speaker 193: and the amendment. we are voting
04:07:15 Speaker 193: on is that the main motion
04:07:16 Speaker 193: be amended by changing clause three
04:07:19 Speaker 193: to reduce the design speed from
04:07:20 Speaker 193: ninety kilometres per hour to eighty
04:07:23 Speaker 193: kilometres per hour in front of
04:07:24 Speaker 193: the new school, and that a
04:07:26 Speaker 193: staff report be brought forward on
04:07:28 Speaker 193: a proposed speed limit of sixty
04:07:31 Speaker 193: kilometres per hour on Grey Road
04:07:32 Speaker 193: Five at this location. All those
04:07:34 Speaker 193: in favour? Okay. Opposed? Okay. So
04:07:36 Speaker 193: that motion is carried. Okay. So
04:07:38 Speaker 193: we are now revisiting the main
04:07:40 Speaker 193: motion. as it has been amended.
04:07:41 Speaker 193: I'll just give a moment for
04:07:44 Speaker 193: the clerk to update that. Okay,
04:07:45 Speaker 193: I have all. Okay, I have
04:07:50 Speaker 227: already read the main motion. I
04:07:53 Speaker 227: have already read the amended motion.
04:07:55 Speaker 227: I'm not going to re-read it
04:07:57 Speaker 227: all piece together, but this was
04:07:58 Speaker 227: with regards to the final sections
04:08:00 Speaker 227: of that motion, so it is
04:08:01 Speaker 227: up on the screen for you
04:08:02 Speaker 227: to do a final review, and
04:08:07 Speaker 227: we'll do for any final discussion
04:08:09 Speaker 227: points on this main motion, which
04:08:10 Speaker 227: is now what we are voting
04:08:18 Speaker 227: on, Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Madam
04:08:32 Speaker 227: Warden, and with regards to the
04:08:34 Speaker 227: amended motion, with regards to the
04:08:36 Speaker 227: report to come back, a lot
04:08:38 Speaker 227: of school zones as. I mentioned
04:08:40 Speaker 227: a little bit ago, reduce the
04:08:41 Speaker 227: speed during school times. I don't
04:08:44 Speaker 227: know if that report can reflect
04:08:46 Speaker 227: that, and what's the rationale around
04:08:47 Speaker 227: that? Because, like I said, in
04:08:48 Speaker 227: Maxwell, at a certain time, it
04:08:50 Speaker 227: goes from fifty to forty during
04:08:52 Speaker 227: that time, and I don't know
04:08:56 Speaker 227: if that can come back
04:08:58 Speaker 227: in the report because that during
04:09:01 Speaker 227: those times may reduce it even
04:09:03 Speaker 227: more. Or what's the rationale behind
04:09:05 Speaker 227: that? Maybe an explanation to the
04:09:08 Speaker 227: report would would speak to that.
04:09:10 Speaker 227: Thank you. Okay, and I guess
04:09:13 Speaker 227: that would also be part of
04:09:14 Speaker 227: in the report would be the
04:09:16 Speaker 227: clarification about being a community safety
04:09:18 Speaker 227: zone as well. Okay, anything else
04:09:20 Speaker 227: to ask, comment? Yes, Councillor Dicker.
04:09:23 Speaker 227: Thank you. On the on page
04:09:25 Speaker 227: fifty four seventy nine, it says
04:09:28 Speaker 227: future short term road and future
04:09:29 Speaker 227: long term road. Can what is
04:09:33 Speaker 227: the definition of is this a
04:09:35 Speaker 227: temporary road or why are they?
04:09:37 Speaker 227: trimming it short term? There might
04:09:38 Speaker 357: be a page differentiation between the
04:09:42 Speaker 358: whole package. Page three, bottom of
04:09:45 Speaker 358: page three. Yeah, thank you for
04:09:46 Speaker 358: that question. So this, so it
04:09:48 Speaker 359: reads, it is unlikely that further
04:09:52 Speaker 359: substantive development would occur on the
04:09:54 Speaker 360: subject lands in the short or
04:09:57 Speaker 360: medium term planning horizon, unless substantive
04:10:01 Speaker 360: changes in the current planning framework
04:10:03 Speaker 360: were to occur. so this is
04:10:06 Speaker 360: a bit confusing. So in this
04:10:09 Speaker 360: case, the the the lands in
04:10:12 Speaker 360: question are actually the lands across
04:10:14 Speaker 360: the road that would be subject
04:10:17 Speaker 360: to an entrance for that fourth
04:10:19 Speaker 360: leg extension. So this piece is
04:10:22 Speaker 360: really around that MTO request.
04:10:25 Speaker 360: And so again, given the limitations
04:10:29 Speaker 360: of development on those lands across
04:10:32 Speaker 360: the road, which are outside of
04:10:35 Speaker 360: the settlement area, located within the
04:10:37 Speaker 360: municipality of Meaford, and also located
04:10:39 Speaker 360: within the Niagara Escarpment Plan area.
04:10:43 Speaker 360: again. So the the short or
04:10:46 Speaker 360: medium term planning horizon, staff feel
04:10:48 Speaker 360: that it's unlikely that development is
04:10:52 Speaker 360: to occur there within that planning
04:10:54 Speaker 360: horizon. If that helps, does that
04:10:57 Speaker 360: make sense? Okay. Is there a
04:10:59 Speaker 360: follow up? So just to clarify,
04:11:02 Speaker 360: so the term short term isn't
04:11:05 Speaker 360: temporary. It's it's a road
04:11:09 Speaker 360: that is planned, but I'm
04:11:12 Speaker 360: just I am. confused as the
04:11:14 Speaker 360: difference between short term and long
04:11:17 Speaker 360: term. Yeah, thank you. So in
04:11:19 Speaker 360: this case, the reference is not
04:11:22 Speaker 360: necessarily about the road. It's really
04:11:27 Speaker 360: about whether or not planning, or
04:11:30 Speaker 360: sorry, new development were to occur
04:11:32 Speaker 360: on those lands across the road.
04:11:35 Speaker 360: So typically, when when we're
04:11:38 Speaker 360: planning, we look sort of twenty,
04:11:41 Speaker 360: twenty five, thirty years out and
04:11:44 Speaker 360: think about kind of what are
04:11:48 Speaker 360: those things that we need to
04:11:51 Speaker 360: consider within that framework. and you
04:11:54 Speaker 360: know, it's unlikely from staff's perspective
04:11:57 Speaker 360: that you know within the next
04:12:01 Speaker 360: twenty years or so we're likely
04:12:03 Speaker 360: to see a settlement area in
04:12:05 Speaker 360: the city of Owen Sound that
04:12:07 Speaker 360: would that would encompass those lands.
04:12:09 Speaker 360: Certainly, we don't have a crystal
04:12:12 Speaker 360: ball; we can't predict the future.
04:12:15 Speaker 360: But given the the planning policies
04:12:19 Speaker 360: and framework that we have at
04:12:21 Speaker 360: this stage, that's that's sort of
04:12:23 Speaker 360: what we're seeing there. So the
04:12:25 Speaker 360: road itself would not be short
04:12:27 Speaker 360: term. The intersection itself would not
04:12:30 Speaker 360: be short term. Be short-term, you
04:12:32 Speaker 360: know. If other developments are proposed
04:12:34 Speaker 360: in the surrounding area, of course,
04:12:36 Speaker 360: we would likely ask for that
04:12:38 Speaker 360: additional traffic review at that stage.
04:12:41 Speaker 360: There may be other additions or
04:12:44 Speaker 360: updates or upgrades to the roads
04:12:45 Speaker 360: proposed at that time, but yeah,
04:12:48 Speaker 360: nothing about the road that's proposed
04:12:52 Speaker 360: at this stage would be sort
04:12:53 Speaker 360: of short-term. Okay. Any other final
04:12:54 Speaker 361: comments? Okay. So we've had a
04:12:59 Speaker 361: healthy discussion on it. It has
04:13:01 Speaker 361: been amended. We are voting now
04:13:02 Speaker 207: on the main. motion as it's
04:13:08 Speaker 207: been amended. We have read that
04:13:15 Speaker 58: out already, so I will call
04:13:21 Speaker 58: the question. All those in favour?
04:13:24 Speaker 58: Okay. Could I ask you all
04:13:26 Speaker 362: to keep your hands up for
04:13:28 Speaker 58: a moment, please? Thank you. Okay.
04:13:31 Speaker 363: So, Madam Clerk, I see that
04:13:36 Speaker 364: is carried. Thank you very much,
04:13:39 Speaker 364: Mr. Ireton and Ms. Hillier, for
04:13:41 Speaker 364: guiding us through that discussion. And
04:13:43 Speaker 365: with that, we will move on
7.e HRR-CW-02-25 Unifor Rockwood Terrace Negotiated Settlement
The meeting heard a report from Director Morrow regarding collective bargaining results between Rockwood Terrace and Unifor Local 302, detailing a new memorandum of settlement for Walkerterra staff that includes wage increases, benefit enhancements such as long-term disability coverage improvements, and an additional paid holiday for Indigenous staff. A motion was moved to receive the report, ratify the recommendations, and authorise the signing of the new collective agreements; Councillor Eccles asked if boot premiums were considered for pay equity, receiving a response that they are based on work duties rather than pay equity comparisons. Council then discussed a report on new multi-residential property tax subclass options, noting concerns that creating such a subclass would shift the tax burden to other existing taxpayers without reducing service consumption and could worsen affordability in urban centres like Owen Sound and Hanover. A speaker proposed an amendment requiring a staff report outlining the financial implications of the proposal before any decision is made, which was moved and seconded for discussion.
04:13:45 Speaker 365: to Item Seven E. And we
04:13:47 Speaker 365: have on line with us we
04:13:50 Speaker 365: have Director Morrow to speak to
04:13:53 Speaker 365: this item. So I will put
04:13:55 Speaker 365: it on the floor. I'll see
04:13:59 Speaker 365: about getting it on the floor
04:14:01 Speaker 365: first. It's recommended that Report HHRCW
04:14:03 Speaker 365: zero two twenty five. CW 0225
04:14:05 Speaker 365: regarding the results of collective bargaining
04:14:07 Speaker 365: between Rockwood Terrace and Unifor Local
04:14:08 Speaker 365: 302 be received, and that County
04:14:10 Speaker 365: Council ratify and approve the recommendations
04:14:13 Speaker 365: of the bargaining team between the
04:14:17 Speaker 365: County of Grey and Unifor Local
04:14:19 Speaker 365: 302 to bind the new collective
04:14:22 Speaker 365: agreements, and that the Warden and
04:14:24 Speaker 365: Clerk be authorised to sign and
04:14:26 Speaker 365: bind the new collective agreements
04:14:29 Speaker 365: as ratified, and that County Council
04:14:32 Speaker 366: authorises staff to make the necessary
04:14:36 Speaker 366: amendments to the rates. of pay,
04:14:38 Speaker 366: benefits, and other issues identified as
04:14:39 Speaker 367: agreed changes, and may ask for
04:14:43 Speaker 367: a mover and a seconder, please.
04:14:45 Speaker 368: Okay, so it's moved by Councillor
04:14:49 Speaker 368: Carleton and seconded by Councillor Mackie.
04:14:52 Speaker 368: It's now on the floor for
04:14:55 Speaker 368: discussion. Welcome, Director Morrow. Good afternoon,
04:14:57 Speaker 368: Board and Matrosovs, and members of
04:14:59 Speaker 368: Council. Firstly, I'm happy to say
04:15:00 Speaker 368: there are no speed limits to
04:15:04 Speaker 368: consider within this report, and I
04:15:06 Speaker 368: will. get us started on a
04:15:07 Speaker 368: brief summary of the agreed-to items
04:15:15 Speaker 368: with our union partners. So, as
04:15:17 Speaker 368: outlined in the recommendation, the County
04:15:18 Speaker 365: of Grey and Unifor Local 302
04:15:22 Speaker 365: successfully negotiated a new memorandum of
04:15:24 Speaker 365: settlement for Walkerterra staff. That is
04:15:26 Speaker 365: all staff, with the exception of
04:15:30 Speaker 365: non-union and our Ona nursing partners.
04:15:32 Speaker 365: So, the settlement supports the county's
04:15:36 Speaker 365: vision to be a high-performance. municipal
04:15:38 Speaker 365: employer and maintains a respectful, respectful
04:15:40 Speaker 365: partnership between management and union representatives.
04:15:42 Speaker 365: Within the memorandum of settlement, there
04:15:45 Speaker 365: are wage increases and premium increases.
04:15:47 Speaker 365: So the agreement includes a market
04:15:48 Speaker 365: adjustment to the role of cook,
04:15:51 Speaker 365: at fifty cents per hour increase
04:15:54 Speaker 365: before across-the-board wage increases for all
04:15:57 Speaker 365: staff. There are general wage increases
04:15:58 Speaker 365: over the two years. totaling six
04:16:01 Speaker 365: percent, we have made modest increases
04:16:03 Speaker 365: to shift premiums for weekdays and
04:16:05 Speaker 365: weekends, and a modest increase to
04:16:07 Speaker 369: responsibility pay for unionized employees who
04:16:12 Speaker 370: temporarily take on supervisory roles. In
04:16:16 Speaker 370: regards to employee employee benefit enhancements,
04:16:18 Speaker 268: we included a long-term disability coverage
04:16:20 Speaker 268: enhancement that matches the rate of
04:16:24 Speaker 268: compensation at today's rate. Previously, we
04:16:26 Speaker 268: had a maximum in there that
04:16:29 Speaker 268: didn't provide for 66% of higher-paid
04:16:31 Speaker 268: staff members within this collective agreement.
04:16:34 Speaker 371: We also included enhancements to pregnancy
04:16:39 Speaker 360: and parental leave top-up provisions and
04:16:43 Speaker 360: an additional paid holiday for unionized
04:16:45 Speaker 360: Indigenous staff members, specifically National Indigenous
04:16:47 Speaker 360: Peoples Day, which is recognized on
04:16:50 Speaker 360: June 21st of each calendar year.
04:16:53 Speaker 360: For working conditions and allowances, the
04:16:54 Speaker 360: agreement defines orientation hours for registered
04:16:56 Speaker 360: practical nurses. It revises job posting
04:17:02 Speaker 38: procedures to recognize our new online
04:17:08 Speaker 38: systems. It provides normative increases for
04:17:10 Speaker 38: reimbursement for uniforms and safety boots
04:17:12 Speaker 38: that are in line with our
04:17:13 Speaker 38: long-term care homes in Markdale and
04:17:16 Speaker 38: Owen Sound, and it increases vacation
04:17:18 Speaker 38: entitlement to six weeks for unionized
04:17:23 Speaker 38: staff members with over. twenty years
04:17:24 Speaker 38: of service. The financial impact and
04:17:27 Speaker 38: costing: the first year cost is
04:17:31 Speaker 38: approximately two hundred thousand four hundred
04:17:33 Speaker 38: and twenty-nine dollars, and the second
04:17:36 Speaker 38: year cost has been roughly
04:17:39 Speaker 38: estimated at two hundred and fifty,
04:17:42 Speaker 38: two hundred and forty-nine, five hundred
04:17:43 Speaker 38: fifty-five thousand in the second year,
04:17:46 Speaker 38: and both of those years are
04:17:48 Speaker 38: within the upset limit that council
04:17:49 Speaker 372: had previously approved when they provided
04:17:55 Speaker 373: us our negotiating mandate. and I'll
04:18:00 Speaker 373: leave the summary at that. And
04:18:01 Speaker 374: I'm available to answer questions if
04:18:05 Speaker 374: anyone has any. Thank you. So
04:18:06 Speaker 375: I'll put it out to county
04:18:11 Speaker 376: council members if they have any
04:18:14 Speaker 376: questions. I think maybe the last
04:18:16 Speaker 376: one just tired everybody out, so
04:18:20 Speaker 376: I don't see anything. We do
04:18:22 Speaker 376: have one from Councillor Eccles. Is
04:18:24 Speaker 376: the shoe? boot, premium—very similar to
04:18:26 Speaker 376: our other contracts, or just the
04:18:28 Speaker 376: contracts within long-term care. Is a
04:18:31 Speaker 376: number of these its pay equity?
04:18:34 Speaker 376: So I was wondering whether that
04:18:37 Speaker 376: is equal going back on the
04:18:39 Speaker 376: pay equity comparisons. Through you, Councillor
04:18:41 Speaker 376: Eccles, we wouldn't be considering pay
04:18:44 Speaker 376: equity when it. comes to boots,
04:18:46 Speaker 376: but we do consider the actual
04:18:47 Speaker 376: work performed. I believe, and without
04:18:49 Speaker 376: pulling all of the collective agreement
04:18:51 Speaker 376: and benefits together, the only group
04:18:54 Speaker 376: that has a higher rate is
04:19:00 Speaker 376: our QB operators, and our QB
04:19:01 Speaker 376: operators are permitted to boot purchases
04:19:06 Speaker 376: within a year within an upset
04:19:07 Speaker 376: limit, and that is due to
04:19:09 Speaker 376: the additional work duties that they
04:19:12 Speaker 376: perform. As you can imagine, when
04:19:14 Speaker 376: you're operating a plow in the
04:19:16 Speaker 376: winter. months—that's a pretty sweaty endeavor
04:19:20 Speaker 376: for your boots—and our QP partners
04:19:22 Speaker 376: go through those faster. Thank you.
04:19:24 Speaker 376: You're welcome. And I was remiss
04:19:26 Speaker 376: earlier. Pardon me, Warden Matrasovs, and
04:19:29 Speaker 376: members of council. I'm happy to
04:19:33 Speaker 376: say as well that the memorandum
04:19:35 Speaker 377: of settlement was successfully, positively ratified
04:19:37 Speaker 376: by our union partners earlier last
04:19:40 Speaker 376: week. Okay. Thank you. So I'll
04:19:42 Speaker 376: look around. the room. We have
04:19:45 Speaker 376: a question from Councillor Mackie. Thanks,
04:19:46 Speaker 376: Madam Warden. Thanks, Jen, for the
04:19:48 Speaker 376: report. The question is around the
04:19:50 Speaker 376: the conditions for the Indigenous holiday
04:19:54 Speaker 376: and whether or not, like in
04:19:58 Speaker 376: BC, it is a statutory holiday
04:20:00 Speaker 376: for the the province of BC.
04:20:02 Speaker 376: Are we giving it to one
04:20:05 Speaker 378: select group, and will we be
04:20:08 Speaker 378: challenged by other staff staff persons
04:20:10 Speaker 378: that they should receive it if?
04:20:13 Speaker 378: we're only giving it to a
04:20:15 Speaker 378: select group. Thanks. The National Truth
04:20:16 Speaker 376: and Reconciliation Day that is recognized
04:20:19 Speaker 376: in the fall is a federal
04:20:22 Speaker 376: statutory holiday. We now, within all
04:20:24 Speaker 376: of our groups, have more than
04:20:27 Speaker 376: the provincial standard. We have some
04:20:29 Speaker 376: recognized days, that being Remembrance Day.
04:20:31 Speaker 376: So yes, we are providing an
04:20:33 Speaker 376: additional day. we do provide National
04:20:35 Speaker 376: Indigenous Peoples Day with the ratification
04:20:37 Speaker 376: of this collective agreement to our
04:20:40 Speaker 376: partners that hold status as First
04:20:42 Speaker 376: Nations, Inuit, and Métis on June
04:20:43 Speaker 376: 21st of each day. It's a
04:20:45 Speaker 376: day to honour and recognize the
04:20:48 Speaker 376: unique heritage, diverse cultures, and outstanding
04:20:49 Speaker 376: contributions to our culture of our
04:20:52 Speaker 376: Indigenous staff members. And I would
04:20:54 Speaker 376: hope that we would not be
04:20:56 Speaker 376: challenged on that, but certainly within
04:21:01 Speaker 376: our culture, providing this day. to
04:21:04 Speaker 376: our Indigenous team members felt like
04:21:07 Speaker 376: a good thing to do to
04:21:09 Speaker 376: recognize their culture. Okay, there's a
04:21:11 Speaker 376: follow-up from Councillor Mackie. So the
04:21:15 Speaker 376: question, Jen, maybe I didn't come
04:21:18 Speaker 376: across it, is not about giving
04:21:22 Speaker 376: it to our our Native or
04:21:24 Speaker 376: Indigenous and Maori members that work
04:21:26 Speaker 376: for us, but will the other
04:21:28 Speaker 376: non-Maori, non-Indigenous members then expect the
04:21:33 Speaker 376: As members, and expect that they're
04:21:35 Speaker 376: going to get this statutory holiday
04:21:37 Speaker 376: also. Through you, Morden Matrosovs, to
04:21:39 Speaker 376: Councillor Mackie, the collective agreement is
04:21:41 Speaker 379: quite clear on who receives it
04:21:45 Speaker 379: and what is needed to qualify
04:21:47 Speaker 379: for it. And being as our
04:21:49 Speaker 379: bargaining unit partners have already ratified,
04:21:51 Speaker 379: I believe there's an understanding of
04:21:52 Speaker 379: what this day is given for
04:21:55 Speaker 379: and what is meant to do.
04:21:58 Speaker 379: Okay. Any other questions? Okay, I
04:21:59 Speaker 376: don't see any further hands up
04:22:02 Speaker 376: for any further questions, so I'll
04:22:04 Speaker 376: call the question. Then, all those
04:22:06 Speaker 376: in favour? Okay. Thank you. That
04:22:08 Speaker 380: motion is carried. Thank you very
04:22:12 Speaker 380: much, Director Morrow. Okay. So next,
04:22:13 Speaker 380: we're going to go to item
04:22:15 Speaker 380: seven F, and it's with regards
04:22:17 Speaker 380: to the new. multi-residential property tax
04:22:18 Speaker 376: subclass, and the recommendation is that
04:22:22 Speaker 376: report FRCW seventeen twenty five new
04:22:25 Speaker 376: multi-residential property tax subclass options and
04:22:28 Speaker 376: considerations be received for information. May
04:22:32 Speaker 376: I ask for a mover and
04:22:34 Speaker 376: a seconder? Moved by Councillor Kevany,
04:22:35 Speaker 376: seconded by Councillor Dobrin. It's now
04:22:38 Speaker 376: on the floor for discussion. Welcome,
04:22:39 Speaker 376: Director Spicer. Thank you, Madam Warden.
04:22:41 Speaker 376: 2:13 in the afternoon. There's probably
04:22:44 Speaker 376: nothing more exciting to everybody in
04:22:47 Speaker 376: the room than tax policy. So
04:22:49 Speaker 376: I like to think that I'm
04:22:53 Speaker 376: just one up to planning. So
04:22:55 Speaker 376: in the spring 2025 budget, there
04:22:58 Speaker 376: was a new optional affordable rental
04:23:00 Speaker 376: housing subclass that was introduced. If
04:23:03 Speaker 376: it's adopted, it it provides a
04:23:07 Speaker 376: reduction of for eligible units of
04:23:08 Speaker 376: up to 35 percent. Of up
04:23:10 Speaker 376: to thirty-five percent of the new
04:23:11 Speaker 381: multi-res rate, and so as a
04:23:15 Speaker 381: reminder, new multi-res is the same
04:23:17 Speaker 381: rate as residential, which is a
04:23:18 Speaker 381: one. So it would be up
04:23:19 Speaker 381: to thirty-five percent, and that's at
04:23:21 Speaker 381: the discretion of the municipality should
04:23:23 Speaker 372: it be adopted. So there's a
04:23:26 Speaker 372: number of requirements that need to
04:23:28 Speaker 262: be met regarding the eligibility. So
04:23:31 Speaker 262: it's not simply that it's the
04:23:33 Speaker 262: overall property or that you're in
04:23:38 Speaker 262: the you're currently in. the original
04:23:40 Speaker 262: multi-residential category, so each unit would
04:23:42 Speaker 262: need to meet the criteria about
04:23:46 Speaker 262: affordability and tax policy. As a
04:23:49 Speaker 262: reminder, set at the the county
04:23:54 Speaker 262: level as the upper tier municipality,
04:23:56 Speaker 262: if we wished to implement this
04:24:00 Speaker 262: new subclass for 2026, a bylaw
04:24:03 Speaker 262: would have to be passed by
04:24:06 Speaker 262: September 30th. Attached to the agenda
04:24:08 Speaker 262: is correspondence that was received. by
04:24:11 Speaker 262: the City of Owen Sound from
04:24:13 Speaker 262: Ontario, so Owen Sound Municipal Nonprofit,
04:24:16 Speaker 262: asking that the subclass be adopted,
04:24:20 Speaker 262: and we haven't received through any
04:24:22 Speaker 262: other member municipalities a similar request.
04:24:26 Speaker 262: But we're aware of other nonprofits
04:24:28 Speaker 262: that are interested in the topic,
04:24:31 Speaker 262: and given the short timeframe to
04:24:34 Speaker 262: make a decision, the recommendation in
04:24:36 Speaker 262: the report is that we study
04:24:37 Speaker 262: the impact. If you're interested in
04:24:38 Speaker 262: pursuing what would be a third.
04:24:43 Speaker 262: multi-residential class, albeit this one would
04:24:45 Speaker 262: be a subclass. And just because
04:24:53 Speaker 262: September thirtieth is the deadline, it
04:24:55 Speaker 262: doesn't mean the deadline forever. It's
04:24:57 Speaker 382: the deadline for 2026. And if
04:25:02 Speaker 130: you chose to tell us that
04:25:05 Speaker 130: you wanted to implement the subclass,
04:25:08 Speaker 130: we would pass the reduction as
04:25:10 Speaker 130: part of the 2026 tax policy,
04:25:12 Speaker 130: which has to be passed in
04:25:14 Speaker 383: 2026. It can't be passed in
04:25:17 Speaker 384: advance. of the year. Just as
04:25:22 Speaker 84: a reminder, so we've currently got
04:25:24 Speaker 385: two tax classes for multi-residential, multi-res,
04:25:27 Speaker 385: which was the the old one,
04:25:29 Speaker 385: and a new multi-res which came
04:25:30 Speaker 385: in at a rate of one
04:25:32 Speaker 385: again the same as residential, and
04:25:33 Speaker 385: the only difference between the two
04:25:35 Speaker 84: was when the properties were built.
04:25:38 Speaker 84: So my report makes the the
04:25:41 Speaker 84: reference that if you had two
04:25:43 Speaker 84: that had the exact same assessed
04:25:44 Speaker 84: value, one built in one. year
04:25:47 Speaker 84: and one built in the year
04:25:48 Speaker 84: that applied to the new multi-res
04:25:50 Speaker 84: class. Then the amount of property
04:25:51 Speaker 84: tax they would pay was different.
04:25:53 Speaker 84: So in 2023, council agreed with
04:25:56 Speaker 84: the recommendation to start moving the
04:25:59 Speaker 84: original multi-res ratio down over four
04:26:01 Speaker 84: years, so that 2026 would be
04:26:04 Speaker 84: the final year, and it would
04:26:07 Speaker 84: then be the same ratio as
04:26:09 Speaker 84: the new multi-res. A new multi-res
04:26:12 Speaker 84: class and residential at one. There'd
04:26:13 Speaker 84: be some work to be done
04:26:15 Speaker 84: to determine eligibility. So we would
04:26:17 Speaker 84: need to determine what properties meet
04:26:19 Speaker 84: the criteria, how many units, and
04:26:24 Speaker 84: work with MPA. So we do
04:26:25 Speaker 84: know the number of units that
04:26:28 Speaker 84: Gray County manages and where they're
04:26:30 Speaker 84: located, and they would qualify to
04:26:32 Speaker 84: move into this category if it
04:26:34 Speaker 84: was adopted. We also know for
04:26:36 Speaker 84: the nonprofits that we provide subsidy
04:26:38 Speaker 84: to where those properties are located,
04:26:41 Speaker 84: and we would have to do
04:26:44 Speaker 84: some work to determine how many
04:26:45 Speaker 84: of them meet the eligibility of
04:26:46 Speaker 84: the affordability criteria, and when whether
04:26:48 Speaker 84: any of their market rent units
04:26:50 Speaker 84: fall into that criteria or not.
04:26:52 Speaker 84: And it's based on the criteria
04:26:54 Speaker 84: that is set for every municipality
04:26:56 Speaker 84: about your affordability levels. And then
04:26:59 Speaker 84: we would also need to work
04:27:02 Speaker 84: to determine if. there's any other
04:27:07 Speaker 84: units across the county that meet
04:27:09 Speaker 84: the criteria that might have these
04:27:11 Speaker 84: federal and provincial agreements that aren't
04:27:13 Speaker 84: anything that falls within our budget.
04:27:15 Speaker 84: That would require some assistance from
04:27:17 Speaker 84: MTE, your member municipalities, and discussions
04:27:19 Speaker 84: with MPAK. And as the report
04:27:23 Speaker 84: mentions, the units we should keep
04:27:24 Speaker 84: in mind are not evenly dispersed
04:27:28 Speaker 84: across the county, so we would
04:27:31 Speaker 84: want to do some sensitivity analysis.
04:27:33 Speaker 84: If you were interested. in ever
04:27:35 Speaker 84: adopting this subclass, to determine the
04:27:36 Speaker 84: impact on the municipalities that obviously
04:27:38 Speaker 84: have more units than the rest,
04:27:41 Speaker 84: and the impact as well, because
04:27:42 Speaker 84: it would also affect the amount
04:27:45 Speaker 84: of property taxes that we are
04:27:47 Speaker 84: paying to your municipalities on behalf
04:27:50 Speaker 84: of the units that we have.
04:27:52 Speaker 84: And again, I know it's a
04:27:54 Speaker 84: not the most exciting topic in
04:27:55 Speaker 84: the world. and I'm happy to
04:27:57 Speaker 386: take your questions. Okay, well, and
04:28:00 Speaker 386: we have it on the floor
04:28:01 Speaker 386: to receive for information, so we'll
04:28:03 Speaker 386: put it out there to see
04:28:04 Speaker 386: if there are council members that
04:28:06 Speaker 386: have questions or comments, and we'll
04:28:08 Speaker 386: begin with Councillor Debrine. Thank you,
04:28:09 Speaker 386: and through you, Warden. Thank you,
04:28:11 Speaker 386: Mayor Lou, and we in Southgate
04:28:12 Speaker 386: are receiving a similar letter from
04:28:14 Speaker 84: a community first housing group in
04:28:18 Speaker 84: Southgate, which we'll be updating. as
04:28:20 Speaker 84: a result of this conversation, realizing
04:28:22 Speaker 84: that the county sets the rates,
04:28:23 Speaker 84: and that there's some work involved
04:28:24 Speaker 387: in determining the implications of existing
04:28:29 Speaker 387: affordable units that would qualify and
04:28:31 Speaker 387: the cost associated, because it, the
04:28:33 Speaker 284: amount of dollars it just shifts
04:28:36 Speaker 284: to residential class. So, I understand
04:28:37 Speaker 284: that there would be work in.
04:28:39 Speaker 284: Would be work involved, and but
04:28:40 Speaker 284: I'm but I'm grateful that you
04:28:42 Speaker 284: clarified that it would apply to
04:28:44 Speaker 284: only those eligible units within a
04:28:46 Speaker 284: multi-residential. So that then there again,
04:28:48 Speaker 284: there's that much more calculations in
04:28:50 Speaker 284: this report through you, Warden. Do
04:28:52 Speaker 284: we need to provide direction that
04:28:55 Speaker 388: we're interested in getting that report
04:29:00 Speaker 388: and further through that process so
04:29:02 Speaker 389: that we. are in a position
04:29:04 Speaker 389: to make a decision as to
04:29:05 Speaker 389: whether or not we want to
04:29:06 Speaker 389: introduce this subclass. Like right now,
04:29:08 Speaker 389: we're only receiving for information. If
04:29:09 Speaker 389: council would like to provide staff
04:29:11 Speaker 390: with direction, that we would need
04:29:16 Speaker 390: to undertake some work. Yes. Okay,
04:29:17 Speaker 390: so we'll just finish our discussion
04:29:18 Speaker 130: and then. perhaps revisit that. We'll
04:29:22 Speaker 130: go to Councillor Greg. Thank you,
04:29:23 Speaker 130: Warden, for the opportunity to speak
04:29:25 Speaker 130: to this. Mary Lou, I've been
04:29:26 Speaker 130: jacked for this report all day.
04:29:29 Speaker 130: Don't sell yourself short. I'm excited.
04:29:32 Speaker 130: I I would actually have a
04:29:34 Speaker 130: subsequent motion to the effect that
04:29:39 Speaker 130: staff not pursue a tax subclass
04:29:40 Speaker 130: for a variety of reasons. Anyone,
04:29:41 Speaker 130: I'm going to enter into a
04:29:44 Speaker 130: debate in this subject. The first
04:29:46 Speaker 130: question. Baiting the subject. The first
04:29:47 Speaker 130: question I'm going to ask them
04:29:48 Speaker 391: is: Are the residents consuming any
04:29:52 Speaker 262: less services than any of the
04:29:56 Speaker 262: other residents around them? We all
04:29:59 Speaker 262: use the same services, and we're
04:30:02 Speaker 262: all asked to pay for them.
04:30:06 Speaker 262: This isn't like farmland that doesn't
04:30:09 Speaker 262: use policing, doesn't go to the
04:30:12 Speaker 262: library, doesn't skate in the ice
04:30:16 Speaker 262: rink, doesn't go to the park.
04:30:18 Speaker 262: It doesn't use any services, so
04:30:20 Speaker 262: there's less tax burden. This is
04:30:23 Speaker 262: a request to minimize the tax
04:30:25 Speaker 262: burden at a great expense. potentially
04:30:29 Speaker 262: to the other existing taxpayers across
04:30:33 Speaker 262: the county, those taxpayers across the
04:30:36 Speaker 262: county did not create the affordability
04:30:37 Speaker 262: crisis. This is something that's been
04:30:40 Speaker 262: building and needs support from higher
04:30:44 Speaker 262: levels of government. But it's unfair
04:30:52 Speaker 382: and not equitable to ask other
04:30:58 Speaker 382: taxpayers to assume the tax burden
04:30:59 Speaker 382: to facilitate this subclass. It's not
04:31:01 Speaker 382: fixing the problem of affordability; it's
04:31:02 Speaker 382: shifting it to 25 or 30
04:31:03 Speaker 46: year olds who are paying. Over
04:31:05 Speaker 46: thirty-year-olds who are paying eighteen hundred
04:31:06 Speaker 335: or two thousand dollars a month
04:31:15 Speaker 335: in an apartment, or forty percent
04:31:17 Speaker 392: or forty-five percent of their income,
04:31:23 Speaker 392: and asking them to pay more
04:31:25 Speaker 392: for the same services as everyone
04:31:26 Speaker 376: else is using. The last thing
04:31:29 Speaker 376: I would say, the easiest part
04:31:33 Speaker 376: of the tax calculation is the
04:31:36 Speaker 376: very last one, which is a
04:31:38 Speaker 376: simple calculation of the tax rate
04:31:41 Speaker 376: versus the assessed value, and the
04:31:43 Speaker 393: framework of the principle of property
04:31:50 Speaker 130: tax as it exists right now,
04:31:54 Speaker 130: is. those that have a higher
04:31:55 Speaker 394: ability to afford to pay more
04:31:59 Speaker 394: do, and it generally comes about
04:32:02 Speaker 394: from the higher assessed value on
04:32:03 Speaker 394: their property. Tax rate is the
04:32:05 Speaker 262: same against higher ability to pay,
04:32:08 Speaker 262: so they pay more. So there's
04:32:08 Speaker 262: already that built into the system,
04:32:12 Speaker 262: and I certainly don't support entertaining
04:32:20 Speaker 262: subclasses that are not going to
04:32:22 Speaker 262: be able to to solve the
04:32:24 Speaker 376: problem, and worse. And worsen affordability
04:32:27 Speaker 376: on other, particularly portions of the
04:32:31 Speaker 395: county, because I'm certainly aware of
04:32:35 Speaker 395: where most of the affordable housing
04:32:36 Speaker 395: would lay, and most of it
04:32:38 Speaker 396: is in the higher urban centres
04:32:40 Speaker 397: of Owen Sound and Hanover. Likely,
04:32:44 Speaker 397: you'd be contributing less to the
04:32:45 Speaker 397: county, and the other municipalities are
04:32:47 Speaker 397: all going to be absorbing that
04:32:48 Speaker 84: reduction from those that tax burden
04:32:52 Speaker 84: coming from those municipalities. So, those
04:32:54 Speaker 84: are my comments on it. I
04:32:57 Speaker 398: am certainly in support of. receiving
04:33:01 Speaker 376: for information, but I don't think
04:33:05 Speaker 376: I. I think I'd like to
04:33:08 Speaker 376: provide direction to staff that in
04:33:11 Speaker 376: the future, in the face of
04:33:14 Speaker 376: further requests that do come in,
04:33:17 Speaker 376: that we're not following up on
04:33:18 Speaker 376: this. There's a plethora of different
04:33:20 Speaker 376: items from the county, I don't,
04:33:22 Speaker 376: or from the province, I don't
04:33:24 Speaker 376: agree with. This is one of
04:33:27 Speaker 376: them. Highway 413, their position on
04:33:28 Speaker 376: speed cameras, bike lanes. The province
04:33:31 Speaker 376: isn't always right, and I think
04:33:38 Speaker 399: this is an indication of something
04:33:41 Speaker 399: they put in the budget that
04:33:42 Speaker 262: is there. but it should not
04:33:45 Speaker 262: be taken advantage of. Okay, thank
04:33:47 Speaker 262: you. So we, the main motion
04:33:50 Speaker 262: right now is that we're looking
04:33:52 Speaker 262: to receive for information. There was
04:33:55 Speaker 262: also some dialogueue that came from
04:33:56 Speaker 262: the previous councillor in terms of
04:34:02 Speaker 284: what what there might be in
04:34:05 Speaker 284: a next step. So we've heard
04:34:06 Speaker 284: a couple of opinions on that.
04:34:07 Speaker 284: So I will look around for
04:34:09 Speaker 400: other comments. We'll go to. I
04:34:15 Speaker 401: was going to say Councillor Nielsen
04:34:17 Speaker 401: because you're sitting in Councillor Nielsen's
04:34:20 Speaker 401: chair. Councillor Mackie, we'll go to
04:34:21 Speaker 401: you. I've had that hat on
04:34:24 Speaker 401: once, but a little bit trouble
04:34:26 Speaker 401: for that. I did. I just
04:34:32 Speaker 401: wanted to say that I agree
04:34:33 Speaker 401: with Councillor Greg, and if he
04:34:35 Speaker 46: is putting a motion on the
04:34:38 Speaker 46: floor, that I would second it.
04:34:41 Speaker 46: We cannot look at this any
04:34:44 Speaker 46: further. Thank you. Okay. Now, the
04:34:47 Speaker 46: way that we have the motion
04:34:51 Speaker 46: right now is just to receive
04:34:53 Speaker 46: for information. Right now. there would
04:34:54 Speaker 46: be no further action, just to
04:34:56 Speaker 46: receive for information. If there's a
04:34:58 Speaker 46: if there's an amendment to that
04:35:00 Speaker 46: main motion, then that may cause
04:35:03 Speaker 46: us to look at at
04:35:06 Speaker 46: other avenues. Okay, looking around the
04:35:08 Speaker 46: room for other discussion. Okay, so
04:35:12 Speaker 335: we are now. It looks like
04:35:18 Speaker 335: we've exhausted the hands on the
04:35:26 Speaker 335: discussion of the main motion. So
04:35:27 Speaker 130: I'll just follow through and say,
04:35:32 Speaker 130: is there an amendment to the
04:35:33 Speaker 130: main motion to propose? So we'll
04:35:34 Speaker 130: go to Councillor Dobrin. So we'll
04:35:36 Speaker 130: go to Councillor Dobrion. Thank you,
04:35:40 Speaker 130: Warden, and through you, appreciating that
04:35:42 Speaker 130: it will require work in providing
04:35:44 Speaker 130: the information, I still feel there
04:35:47 Speaker 130: is value to this table to
04:35:48 Speaker 130: understanding the impact that this request
04:35:50 Speaker 130: would have on our residents, whether
04:36:02 Speaker 130: or not it's introduced. I'm
04:36:12 Speaker 06: not in favour usually of of
04:36:16 Speaker 06: asking for work. that might not
04:36:21 Speaker 06: get supported, but in this
04:36:26 Speaker 06: case, we are all getting
04:36:35 Speaker 06: the requests to, and I
04:36:40 Speaker 06: think it's worth understanding what the
04:36:44 Speaker 06: financial implications would be on our
04:36:48 Speaker 06: our tax taxpayers. So I would
04:36:55 Speaker 06: like to put a motion
04:37:01 Speaker 06: for an amendment forward, and that
04:37:06 Speaker 06: a staff report come back to
04:37:11 Speaker 06: council outlining the. Financial
04:37:16 Speaker 06: implications of this subclass proposal.
04:37:23 Speaker 06: Okay, thank you. And Deputy Warden,
04:37:26 Speaker 06: are you seconding that? Okay, so
04:37:40 Speaker 06: it's moved and seconded. We're going
04:37:42 Speaker 06: to give the clerk a moment
04:37:43 Speaker 06: to put that up onto the
04:37:44 Speaker 06: screen, and then we'll make sure
04:37:46 Speaker 06: the wording is correct for you,
04:37:47 Speaker 06: Councillor Dobrin. And just before we
04:37:48 Speaker 06: visit that, we'll go to Mary
04:37:50 Speaker 130: Lou. Thank you, Madam Warden. And
04:37:53 Speaker 130: so, just for clarity, if we
04:40:32 Speaker 130: go ahead and we study this,
04:40:33 Speaker 130: if there is no bylaw passed
04:40:35 Speaker 130: by September 30th, there is no
04:40:37 Speaker 130: adoption of the subclass for 2026.
04:40:38 Speaker 130: So we'd be studying this in
04:40:39 Speaker 130: 2027, with the earliest adoption, if
04:40:40 Speaker 130: Council chose, would be 2027.
04:42:11 Speaker 130: Okay,
04:42:30 Speaker 130: so Councillor Debrine has been moved
04:42:31 Speaker 130: and seconded. Is there some clarification
04:42:39 Speaker 130: in the wording then that you
04:42:43 Speaker 130: wish? Or yes, thank you. Just
04:42:45 Speaker 402: to clarify that we would not
04:42:48 Speaker 402: be a report would not be
04:42:49 Speaker 402: coming back. The work would not
04:42:51 Speaker 402: be done until 2027 for 2027,
04:42:52 Speaker 402: or it would be done in
04:42:54 Speaker 402: 2026 for implementation. at the end
04:42:55 Speaker 402: of 2026 for 2027. Through Madam
04:42:57 Speaker 402: Warden, yes. So we would undertake
04:42:58 Speaker 402: work in 2026 to inform a
04:42:59 Speaker 402: decision that would either be made
04:43:02 Speaker 402: or, for information only, for 2027
04:43:03 Speaker 403: tax policy. Okay, thank you. So
04:43:06 Speaker 403: it's been moved and seconded. It's
04:43:07 Speaker 403: on the floor for discussion. We're
04:43:08 Speaker 403: just discussing discussing the amendment. we'll
04:43:10 Speaker 403: go to Councillor Greg. Thank you.
04:43:11 Speaker 403: Quick question to Mary Lou: Can
04:43:12 Speaker 403: you confirm yes or no that
04:43:14 Speaker 403: there's going to still be a
04:43:16 Speaker 20: subsequent reduction in the old multi-residential
04:43:19 Speaker 20: rate next year, as long as
04:43:21 Speaker 20: Council conforms to the trajectory that
04:43:24 Speaker 20: we had set? Through you, Madam
04:43:27 Speaker 20: Warden. So you're correct, Councillor Greg,
04:43:29 Speaker 20: that 2026 is the last year
04:43:37 Speaker 20: of the. proposed reduction to the
04:43:39 Speaker 20: original multi-res ratio, and as we've
04:43:40 Speaker 20: done with the the previous three
04:43:41 Speaker 20: reductions, we have worked in conjunction
04:43:42 Speaker 20: with the City of Owens Sound
04:43:44 Speaker 20: because we need to be in
04:43:46 Speaker 20: lockstep with the city. It would
04:43:48 Speaker 20: not serve any benefit if we
04:43:49 Speaker 20: implemented the reduction and Owens Sound
04:43:51 Speaker 20: did not, because again, where are
04:43:53 Speaker 20: the the bulk of the units?
04:43:56 Speaker 20: Okay, we'll go to Councillor Dobrin.
04:44:02 Speaker 20: Thank you, and I did note
04:44:05 Speaker 20: that I would like to modify
04:44:09 Speaker 20: the wording somewhat, just to clarify
7.f FR-CW-17-25 New Multi-Residential Property Tax Subclass Options and Considerations
The meeting defeated an amendment to a motion regarding new multi-residential property tax subclass options by a vote of 49 to 31. Following the defeat of the amendment, the main motion to receive report FRCW 1725 for information was carried.
04:44:12 Speaker 20: that this is a property subclass
04:44:15 Speaker 20: of up to 35%. It wouldn't
04:44:17 Speaker 20: mean that even if Council decided
04:44:19 Speaker 20: to pursue it, that it would
04:44:23 Speaker 20: have to be the full 35%.
04:44:25 Speaker 20: Correct? Okay, let me hear the
04:44:28 Speaker 20: response because I have to make
04:44:30 Speaker 20: sure. we're not doing anything that's
04:44:32 Speaker 20: substantive in the the motion that's
04:44:35 Speaker 20: been moved and seconded. Thank you,
04:44:37 Speaker 20: Madam Warden. Yes, the the way
04:44:39 Speaker 20: the proposal the subclass works is
04:44:42 Speaker 20: that a council could choose to
04:44:43 Speaker 20: make in a reduction of up
04:44:48 Speaker 20: to thirty five percent, and it
04:44:49 Speaker 20: would be the council's choice of
04:44:53 Speaker 20: what that percent was. Okay, so
04:44:55 Speaker 20: there's no need to make any
04:44:57 Speaker 20: clarification. in the motion. Okay. Any
04:44:59 Speaker 20: other discussion on the amendment? Okay.
04:45:02 Speaker 20: We're ready to call the the
04:45:04 Speaker 20: vote on the amendment. And it
04:45:08 Speaker 20: is where is the amendment card?
04:45:09 Speaker 20: So the amendment that we're voting
04:45:12 Speaker 20: on that has been moved and
04:45:14 Speaker 20: seconded is that the motion be
04:45:22 Speaker 20: amended. The main motion be amended
04:45:24 Speaker 404: by inserting a clause to request
04:45:26 Speaker 404: a staff report on financial impacts
04:45:27 Speaker 405: on implementation of. the new multi-residential
04:45:31 Speaker 405: property tax subclass, that's what we're
04:45:32 Speaker 20: voting on. All those in favour?
04:45:35 Speaker 20: Okay, hold your hands high, please,
04:45:37 Speaker 406: for me. Okay, and all those
04:45:40 Speaker 407: against? Okay. Okay, Madam Clerk, there's
04:45:42 Speaker 408: a request for a recorded vote.
04:45:45 Speaker 408: We will. Madam Clerk, I want
04:45:47 Speaker 408: to give you some time and
04:45:48 Speaker 408: space to set that up. So
04:45:50 Speaker 408: I'll declare a two-minute break before
04:45:51 Speaker 409: we call that vote. Oh, okay.
04:45:54 Speaker 410: Sorry, there's a new system in
04:45:58 Speaker 411: place. She's all set. We've got
04:46:01 Speaker 84: the go-ahead. Okay. All right. So,
04:46:06 Speaker 84: Madam Clerk, then if you are
04:46:11 Speaker 412: ready, then please call that recorded
04:46:14 Speaker 412: vote. Councillor Mackie. I didn't. Councillor
04:46:16 Speaker 84: MacEachie opposed. Councillor McKay is absent.
04:46:19 Speaker 84: Councillor Carleton, Councillor Carleton is in
04:46:21 Speaker 84: favour. Councillor Pringle opposed. Councillor McQueen
04:46:23 Speaker 84: opposed. Councillor Nielsen. Opposed. Opposed. Councillor
04:46:24 Speaker 84: Patterson. Opposed. Councillor Dickert. Opposed. Councillor
04:46:26 Speaker 84: Kentner. Sorry, that was in favour.
04:46:28 Speaker 84: Okay. Councillor Kentner is in favour.
04:46:29 Speaker 84: Councillor Kieveny. In favour. Councillor Body.
04:46:31 Speaker 84: Opposed. Councillor Gregg, opposed. Councillor Milne,
04:46:34 Speaker 84: in favour. Councillor Dobrine, in favour.
04:46:36 Speaker 84: Warden Matrasovs, in favour. In favour.
04:46:39 Speaker 84: Councillor Boardinghouse absent. Councillor Eccles, opposed.
04:46:40 Speaker 413: Councillor Hutchinson left at lunch. That
04:46:44 Speaker 413: moment. That motion lost forty nine
04:46:46 Speaker 413: thirty one. Okay, thank you. We
04:46:48 Speaker 413: actually have gone past break time,
04:46:49 Speaker 413: so I'm just going to call
04:46:51 Speaker 413: a two minute break. If we
04:46:53 Speaker 414: can just, if anybody needs a
04:46:55 Speaker 414: break, because we do have a
04:46:57 Speaker 414: number of items left to go
04:46:59 Speaker 415: on the agenda, and and then
04:47:01 Speaker 415: we'll reconvene. So two minutes will
04:47:03 Speaker 415: be. back on schedule. Okay, so
04:47:08 Speaker 415: that has been a brief break.
04:47:10 Speaker 415: I'm going to encourage our county
04:47:13 Speaker 415: council members to come back to
04:47:17 Speaker 415: their seats, and perhaps we can
04:47:20 Speaker 416: get somebody to round up others
04:47:26 Speaker 416: who may have left the room.
04:47:28 Speaker 416: All right. So I think we
04:47:29 Speaker 416: looks like we're getting a quorum
04:47:32 Speaker 417: of everyone seated. Okay. and Senior
04:47:34 Speaker 417: Manager Whitney, I know you're all
04:47:36 Speaker 417: excited about getting up, but hold
04:47:39 Speaker 417: on a second. I am going
04:47:40 Speaker 417: to put six B in front
04:47:43 Speaker 417: of you because yours is related
04:47:45 Speaker 417: to us going into closed session.
04:47:48 Speaker 417: So it makes for the flow
04:47:51 Speaker 417: of things. The clerk and I
04:47:52 Speaker 417: discussed that it's better that we
04:47:53 Speaker 417: take care of a brief. I
04:47:55 Speaker 417: understand there's just a brief question
04:47:57 Speaker 417: on item six B, which was
04:47:58 Speaker 418: pulled from the consent agenda. So
04:48:02 Speaker 84: it's okay. Just relax. I've got
04:48:07 Speaker 84: my eye on you. I know.
04:48:09 Speaker 84: I know you're heading our way.
04:48:12 Speaker 84: Okay, so we're going to return
04:48:14 Speaker 84: to the one item that was
04:48:16 Speaker 84: pulled from the consent, which is
04:48:18 Speaker 84: item six B, and it was.
04:48:22 Speaker 84: It is recommended that PDR CW
04:48:24 Speaker 84: fifty three twenty five be received,
04:48:26 Speaker 84: and that the application for
04:48:29 Speaker 38: minor exemption under the County Forest
04:48:34 Speaker 38: Management Bylaw, one lot one ninety
04:48:38 Speaker 38: six concession one ESTR. Oh. Oh.
04:48:39 Speaker 38: thank you. Okay, sorry. Yeah, because
04:48:42 Speaker 38: we called the break in between
04:48:43 Speaker 38: the amendment and the main motion,
04:48:46 Speaker 38: we do need to go back
04:48:49 Speaker 38: to that main motion. So just
04:48:54 Speaker 38: before we get to six B,
04:48:58 Speaker 38: I'll stop there, and we do
04:49:01 Speaker 38: have the main motion still to
04:49:02 Speaker 38: take care of that we stopped
04:49:05 Speaker 38: short of just before our break,
04:49:07 Speaker 38: and the main motion on. Make
04:49:11 Speaker 419: sure this is all clear. The
04:49:14 Speaker 130: main motion for seven F is
04:49:17 Speaker 130: that. 7F is that the report
04:49:20 Speaker 130: FRCW 1725 new multi-residential property tax
04:49:22 Speaker 130: class a subclass options and considerations
04:49:26 Speaker 130: be received for information? That is
04:49:28 Speaker 130: what we are voting on. Any
04:49:30 Speaker 130: further discussion on receiving for information?
04:49:32 Speaker 130: All those in favour? And that
04:49:34 Speaker 130: motion is carried. Thank you. Okay,
04:49:37 Speaker 130: so thank you very much for
04:49:39 Speaker 130: everyone's guidance in that. We'll
04:49:41 Speaker 130: return back to 6B then. It's.
04:49:43 Speaker 420: Six B. Then, it's recommended that
04:49:48 Speaker 420: report PDR CW fifty three
04:49:51 Speaker 420: twenty five be received, and that
04:49:52 Speaker 130: the application for minor exemption under
04:49:55 Speaker 130: the County Forest Management Bylaw for
04:49:57 Speaker 130: Lot one ninety six Concession one
04:50:06 Speaker 130: ESTR Geographic Township of Artemisia, now
04:50:07 Speaker 130: in the Municipality of Grey Highlands,
04:50:09 Speaker 130: municipally known as seven seven three
04:50:11 Speaker 421: zero nine three Highway ten B,
04:50:13 Speaker 421: approved. May I ask for a
04:50:15 Speaker 421: mover and a seconder? Moved by
04:50:18 Speaker 421: Councillor Pringle. Seconded. Pringle, seconder, seconded
04:50:19 Speaker 421: by Councillor Mackey. It's on the
04:50:22 Speaker 421: floor for discussion, and we'll bring
04:50:23 Speaker 421: up Sarah Johnson is all ready
04:50:26 Speaker 421: to make her her presentation, and
04:50:29 Speaker 421: then we will go to the
04:50:30 Speaker 421: questions for which it was pulled.
04:50:31 Speaker 421: Thank you. Thank you. I actually
04:50:35 Speaker 421: don't have a formal presentation prepared,
04:50:37 Speaker 421: but I'm willing or ready to
04:50:39 Speaker 421: take any questions that there may
04:50:42 Speaker 421: be. Oh, okay, all right. So
04:50:45 Speaker 422: she is here as a resource
04:50:47 Speaker 422: to answer any questions. So, Councillor
04:50:49 Speaker 422: Greg, you requested this be pulled.
04:50:50 Speaker 422: Thank you for the opportunity, Madam
04:50:51 Speaker 422: Warden. The question is, Sarah, having
04:50:54 Speaker 423: sat many years in the Conservation
04:50:56 Speaker 424: Authority and being able to see
04:51:00 Speaker 424: some of the the tree planting
04:51:02 Speaker 424: programmemes that are in place, some
04:51:04 Speaker 424: of them are taxpayer funded. This
04:51:06 Speaker 424: has the appearance of a plantation,
04:51:07 Speaker 424: an intensive An intentional plantation. I
04:51:09 Speaker 424: just wonder: is there anything currently
04:51:11 Speaker 424: in place that safeguards if taxpayer-funded
04:51:13 Speaker 424: programmemes were utilised for certain properties?
04:51:14 Speaker 424: Are they protected for a number
04:51:17 Speaker 424: of years against just being plowed
04:51:20 Speaker 424: under, so so to speak? Or
04:51:22 Speaker 424: is that something that doesn't exist?
04:51:25 Speaker 424: However, it's something that we might
04:51:28 Speaker 424: be contemplating when we're looking at
04:51:29 Speaker 424: new tree bylaw and update. Bylaw
04:51:31 Speaker 424: and updates, because that's the one
04:51:34 Speaker 424: concern I have here. Is it
04:51:35 Speaker 424: kind of looks like a youthful
04:51:37 Speaker 424: new planning, and I think it
04:51:40 Speaker 424: it could be frustrating to see
04:51:42 Speaker 424: taxpayer dollars expended on programmemes only
04:51:43 Speaker 424: to see them pout under a
04:51:45 Speaker 424: couple years after. Through you, Warden,
04:51:48 Speaker 424: I did have an opportunity this
04:51:51 Speaker 424: morning to reach out to Soggying
04:51:54 Speaker 425: Valley because it's their watershed that
04:51:59 Speaker 425: it's in, and I spoke with
04:52:00 Speaker 425: Donna Lacy about this property in
04:52:02 Speaker 426: particular. CA did plant this property,
04:52:05 Speaker 426: but they have no record indicating
04:52:05 Speaker 426: that they used a funding programme
04:52:07 Speaker 427: in order to do that. That
04:52:12 Speaker 428: said, within the bylaw itself, there's
04:52:15 Speaker 429: no mechanism that restricts a landowner
04:52:18 Speaker 429: should they purchase property to prevent
04:52:19 Speaker 429: them from doing what you have
04:52:20 Speaker 429: have indicated, plowing under a previously
04:52:23 Speaker 429: planted woodland that has been used
04:52:30 Speaker 429: through those kind of funding programmemes.
04:52:32 Speaker 429: Oh, so sorry, and and just
04:52:33 Speaker 429: to add on that, the new
04:52:34 Speaker 429: bylaw itself, we're looking into ways
04:52:36 Speaker 429: as to how we can protect
04:52:37 Speaker 429: these properties a little bit better.
04:52:39 Speaker 429: But as we know, we haven't
04:52:41 Speaker 429: got that that far yet. But
04:52:43 Speaker 429: we are looking into ways that
04:52:45 Speaker 429: we can manage those properties. There
04:52:48 Speaker 429: are checks and balances, specifically when
04:52:50 Speaker 430: people are doing harvesting applications, that
04:52:54 Speaker 430: they have to indicate that you
04:52:56 Speaker 431: know they're part of the MFT.
04:53:01 Speaker 431: Indicate that you know they're part
04:53:03 Speaker 431: of the MIFTIP programme or that
04:53:04 Speaker 431: sort of thing. So there are
04:53:06 Speaker 431: there are opportunities within the bio
04:53:07 Speaker 431: update for us to look into
04:53:09 Speaker 432: things like that. I appreciate hearing
04:53:13 Speaker 56: that. That's great feedback that you're
04:53:16 Speaker 56: still looking or potentially looking into
04:53:17 Speaker 56: that. Yeah, I know the managed
04:53:22 Speaker 56: forest programmemes are in place, but
04:53:24 Speaker 433: is you know this could be
04:53:29 Speaker 433: something like if you purchased a
04:53:32 Speaker 382: heritage building, it comes with certain.
04:53:36 Speaker 382: expectations on the purchaser, so it's
04:53:42 Speaker 382: just good to know that staff
04:53:43 Speaker 382: are are evaluating the potential considerations
04:53:44 Speaker 382: there. Thanks. Okay. Any other questions
04:53:46 Speaker 382: for our coordinator? Okay. Not seeing
04:53:48 Speaker 434: any, then we'll call the question.
04:53:51 Speaker 434: All those in favour, and that
04:53:53 Speaker 435: motion is carried. Thank you very
04:53:58 Speaker 435: much for providing that information. Okay.
04:53:59 Speaker 227: That allows us now. Get ready,
04:54:03 Speaker 227: Eric. Get ready. Here it comes.
04:54:04 Speaker 436: Okay, so we are on our
7.g CSR-CW-19-25 Administration Building Roof
A motion was moved by Councillor Carleton and seconded by Councillor DeBree to receive the report regarding roof repairs for the Gray County Administration Building, utilise Garland Canada to complete the work using unbudgeted funding from the 2025 property budget surplus, and transfer remaining funds from the Administration Properties Reserve. The motion was moved and seconded but no vote outcome or adoption is recorded in the source window.
04:54:07 Speaker 437: last item for open, seven G,
04:54:09 Speaker 438: and we may or may not
04:54:14 Speaker 438: need to go into closed for
04:54:16 Speaker 438: this particular item only if council
04:54:17 Speaker 439: members wish that they need some
04:54:20 Speaker 440: solicitor client privilege information, advice. So
04:54:24 Speaker 440: with that, then I'll recommend. It's
04:54:25 Speaker 440: recommended that report CSR C W.
04:54:27 Speaker 440: Report CSRCW 1925 regarding roof repairs
04:54:34 Speaker 440: for the roofing system at the
04:54:35 Speaker 440: Gray County Administration Building be received,
04:54:37 Speaker 440: and that the County of Gray
04:54:38 Speaker 440: utilised Garland Canada to complete the
04:54:40 Speaker 130: roof repairs, and that the unbudgeted
04:54:44 Speaker 130: funding for roof repairs be taken
04:54:45 Speaker 130: from any surplus realized in the
04:54:47 Speaker 130: 2025 property budget, and the remaining
04:54:48 Speaker 130: funds be transferred from the Administration
04:54:50 Speaker 130: Properties Reserve. Do we have a
04:54:55 Speaker 130: mover for that? Okay. Moved by
04:54:56 Speaker 130: Councillor Carleton, seconded by Councillor DeBree.
04:54:58 Speaker 130: Thank you. It's moved and seconded.
04:55:00 Speaker 130: It's on the floor. Thank you
04:55:01 Speaker 130: very much, Senior Manager Whitney. And
04:55:04 Speaker 130: the floor is yours. I'm just
04:55:06 Speaker 130: going to give a quick background
04:55:08 Speaker 130: on the roof. Basically, the roof
04:55:11 Speaker 130: on the existing part of the
04:55:13 Speaker 130: building was done in 2017 as
04:55:14 Speaker 130: part of the renovation. we hired
04:55:16 Speaker 130: consultant Gardland Canada to come in
04:55:19 Speaker 130: and oversee the work that was
04:55:22 Speaker 130: being done. They specified their
04:55:25 Speaker 130: products, and then we go out
04:55:27 Speaker 130: to tender to get a contractor
04:55:31 Speaker 130: to complete the work. Last fall,
04:55:33 Speaker 130: we had a leak in one
04:55:35 Speaker 130: of our washrooms on the second
04:55:38 Speaker 130: floor. Upon further investigation, we found
04:55:39 Speaker 130: a small leak in the BearVault
04:55:41 Speaker 130: systems.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We also noted that part of the flat roof was spongy and soft.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We then had Garland Canada back in, and they did some probing and some thermal scan.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So they go in at night and do a thermal scan, and we found that four thousand square feet of roof is wet.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So we had Polard come in.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: They fixed the one leak.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We haven't had any leaks since.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So there is just wet insulation right now that we need to remove and add a new membrane to it.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We did have a third party come in.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We had DJ Pete, who is now Ned Law, and they came up with some potential causes.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: The mechanical curbs are too low.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: There's not enough roof trains and ram bearing terminations.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: That mechanical curbs are deficient.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So we had them do up a quote for us.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: They are projecting two hundred ten thousand dollars for a roof replacement.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: If we went with them, it would void our warranty with Garland.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So we are recommending that we get.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Garland to do the specs, the drawings, tender it out, and have them do it, as that would keep the warranty going on the whole entire roof.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So I'm happy to answer any questions regarding the existing leak or any issues.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Okay, thank you.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So we've got questions.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We'll begin with the deputy warden.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Thank you, warden.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: And I guess I'm having a little bit of trouble connecting the dots here.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Uh, was As was earlier noticed, what would be the point of worrying about voiding the warranty if the warranty doesn't cover the work that is going to be is being proposed here now?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Can you help me with that, please?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So that's two options that I mean we have on the table right now.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: I mean we can go with Garland.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We you we can go to a different company.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: and not have the warranty.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Now they would provide a warranty on their work for ten years, but we would void the warranty on the twenty-five years on the existing the the existing portion of the other roof.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: I guess is my answer.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: And there is some legal stuff involved in that.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So, okay.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So be careful because anything further than that, we would need to go into closed session to pursue.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: To close session to pursue that, I'll look to see if there are any other questions.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We'll go to Councillor Dobrin.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Thank you, and and I too had a similar question because the report says that it's not covered under warranty, but that if we choose anyone other than them, it will avoid the warranty.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: That it's not covered under.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: But the motion.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Okay, I'm just gonna go over to the CAO first, and Aaron can correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I think it's it would potentially avoid the warranty on the remaining portions of the roof, so the other portions that we have currently under warranty with with Garland.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Okay, so I'll put it out if there are other questions, and we'll.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Decide whether or not we need to go into closed session, Councillor McQueen.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: We can, Madam Warden, a couple questions.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: What does the warranty actually say?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: One.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: And obviously there was a leak, and they fixed it.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Did they do that repair gratis because of the warranty?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: But if the warranty, okay, maybe I'll stop there and come back.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: But what what does the warranty say?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Right.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Okay.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: I think at this point, in order for us to have full details, it would be best that we carry on this conversation in closed session.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So, with that, then, Madam Clerk, if we go into closed session, we can entertain both items and then come back out to this as an open question, open session question.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Okay.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So, let's, in order for staff to be able to provide full answers, let us recommend that the committee.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: I recommend that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to section 239.2 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, to discuss number one, a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board, and this is potential land exchanges with the Township of Southgate, and number two, advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, if as it's required, about regarding the Grey County Administration Building roof repair.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: May I ask remover?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: May ask for mover, Councillor Green moves, and Councillor Mackey seconds to go into closed session.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: Any discussion?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: All those in favour?
04:55:41 Speaker 130: That is carried.
04:55:41 Speaker 130: So we'll take a moment to go into closed session, and then we will carry.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.