Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — July 9, 2026
Hook: 2026 Budget Fiscal Approval
Grey County · Committee of the Whole · July 9, 2026
Summary
On July 9, the Committee of the Whole for Grey County convened to address pressing fiscal realities, transit stability, and community safety concerns following an audit confirmation year-end. The meeting moved quickly past procedural formality into substantive financial updates that reveal a county navigating inflationary pressure on construction materials while protecting vulnerable services like court security and rural transit. Staff confirmed a clean 2025 audit opinion with net assets of $36 million, yet specific departments face immediate variances driven by timing differences in insurance payments and unanticipated costs for IT infrastructure. A significant debate emerged regarding traffic safety along Grey Road 13 and the viability of existing bus routes, resulting in decisions that prioritize data collection over hasty capital expenditure—a distributive justice approach ensuring resources aren't squandered on unnecessary projects while maintaining essential mobility networks.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Audit Confirms a Clean Opinion on Financial Statements Showing $130m: Robyn Strangway-Calder presented the MNP audit findings for the year ending December 31, 2025, confirming a clean opinion with no unadjusted differences or suspected fraud. The financial statements show total assets of $130 million against liabilities of $94 million, resulting in net financial assets of $36 million and an accumulated surplus of $343 million which includes reserves totaling $65.5 million.
- Audited Surplus of $1.8m Held Steady Against $51m Capital Spending While Unspent: The audit review confirmed a projected operating surplus of $1.8 million transferred to reserves remained stable despite amortization and capital asset acquisitions totaling $51 million during the year. While the budget anticipated a larger decrease in net financial assets due to expected debt utilization for the Rockwood Terrace project, actual expenditures were lower because external funding timelines shifted; specifically, unspent Seawell grant funds amounting to approximately six million dollars were returned to the province as operators could not build new childcare centers without guaranteed license increases.
- Staff Explain the Study Covers Over Twelve Thousand Square Kilometers Which Is: The regional transit study covers a vast geography of over twelve thousand square kilometers, making it fifty three percent larger than the GTA and the biggest provincial undertaking of its kind. Complexity arises from aligning diverse needs across four counties while managing frozen gas tax figures based on two-year-old ridership assumptions versus current OTIF funding declines.
- Financial Update Reveals IT Deficits from Switch Replacements, Court Security Overruns: Manager Reid presented a corporate financial update as of April 30th, noting significant variances driven by seasonality and timing differences in insurance payments rather than actual deficits. The report highlighted an expected deficit in the IT capital budget due to over-budget costs for switches and wireless access points at existing buildings, while new building construction costs are absorbed into separate capital projects.
- Council Advocates County Funding for Physical Traffic Calming Barriers on Gray Road: Councillor Paul McQueen moved a motion to receive correspondence from the Municipality of Grey Highlands regarding traffic calming measures on Gray Road 13 for the village of Kimberly, supported by Councillors Nielsen and Gregg. The proposal advocates county funding for physical barriers as a pilot initiative, noting their seasonal use in other areas like Morning's Mills near Fergus due to snow plowing constraints.
- Staff Will Report Back with an Investigation Into Physical Traffic Calming Measures: Councillors debated traffic calming measures for Grey Road 13, specifically addressing the failure of previous interventions in Kimberley and questioning the utility of spending three million dollars on road smoothing before slowing speeds. Paul McQueen argued against physical driver performance restrictions like speed traps or electronic signs without police backup, citing tight budgets that prevent assigning officers to every hamlet across Gray County.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- Committee of the Whole
- Date
- July 9, 2026
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Committee called to order by Paul McQueen on July 9, 2026.
00:00:04 Speaker 01: Okay, we are set to go.
00:00:05 Speaker 01: So I will call to order
00:00:06 Speaker 01: this committee. The whole meeting of
00:00:08 Speaker 01: July ninth, twenty twenty-six. At this
00:00:11 Speaker 01: point in time, I'll put out
00:00:12 Speaker 01: a call. Are there any declarations
2 Declaration of Interest
No declared interests were reported by Paul Mcqueen before business proceeded.
00:00:13 Speaker 01: of interest on today's agenda? Seeing
00:00:16 Speaker 01: no hands raised, we'll progress. Business
3 Business Arising from Minutes
The meeting moves forward from the previous item.
00:00:19 Speaker 01: arising for minutes. Okay, so then
00:00:23 Speaker 01: we will move on. Then to
4.a Assurance and Accounting - 2025 Audit - Robyn Strangway-Calder, Senior Manager - MNP
Robin Strangway-Calder presented the MNP audit findings for the year ending December 31, 2025, confirming a clean opinion with no unadjusted differences or suspected fraud. The financial statements show total assets of $130 million against liabilities of $94 million, resulting in net financial assets of $36 million and an accumulated surplus of $343 million which includes reserves totaling $65.5 million. Cash decreased to $118 million due to the expenditure of deferred revenue held from 2024, specifically regarding Rockward Terrace projects where late funding was spent during the year. The balance sheet details include tangible capital assets rising to $305.4 million and specific breakdowns for unspent development charges at $24.5 million alongside Canada Community Building funds.
00:00:25 Speaker 01: we do have a delegation this
00:00:26 Speaker 01: morning. I would like to welcome
00:00:28 Speaker 01: both Ashley Cameron and Robin. Strangeway
00:00:30 Speaker 01: Calder, who will be providing us
00:00:33 Speaker 01: with the delegation. But let me
00:00:35 Speaker 01: first get the motion on the
00:00:37 Speaker 01: floor before they speak. So I
00:00:39 Speaker 01: will look for a motion that
00:00:40 Speaker 01: the financial statements for the year
00:00:42 Speaker 01: ending December thirty first, twenty twenty
00:00:44 Speaker 01: five, be received, and that the
00:00:46 Speaker 01: treasurer be hereby authorized to approve
00:00:48 Speaker 01: and sign the financial statements, and
00:00:51 Speaker 01: the staff be authorized to proceed
00:00:53 Speaker 01: prior to county county council approval
00:00:56 Speaker 01: as per section twenty six six.
00:00:59 Speaker 01: B of the procedural bylaw fifty
00:01:01 Speaker 01: one thirty four twenty two may
00:01:03 Speaker 01: ask for a mover and a
00:01:04 Speaker 01: seconder. Okay, got to get somebody
00:01:05 Speaker 01: fresh here. So I'm going to
00:01:07 Speaker 01: go, Councillor Mackie and Councillor Hutchins
00:01:09 Speaker 01: in a second seconding. Thank you.
00:01:11 Speaker 01: It's now on the floor for
00:01:13 Speaker 01: discussion. So welcome to you. The
00:01:14 Speaker 01: lectern is yours, and and we'll
00:01:15 Speaker 01: just make sure that we alternate
00:01:17 Speaker 01: between when the red red light
00:01:18 Speaker 01: is on. So I'm going to
00:01:19 Speaker 01: turn mine off, and you can
00:01:21 Speaker 01: turn yours on, and we'll go
00:01:24 Speaker 01: back and forth. Thank you. Can
00:01:27 Speaker 01: you hear me? Excellent. I'd like
00:01:28 Speaker 01: to thank Council for having me
00:01:29 Speaker 01: here this morning. I'm Robin Strangway
00:01:31 Speaker 01: Calder. I'm the engagement partner on
00:01:33 Speaker 01: your audit, and I assumed the
00:01:35 Speaker 01: role that used to be Tracy
00:01:38 Speaker 01: Smith upon her retirement. I have
00:01:39 Speaker 01: with me Ashley Cameron, a manager
00:01:41 Speaker 01: who's taken over the role of
00:01:43 Speaker 01: supervising the audit. I'd like to
00:01:45 Speaker 01: thank your entire management team for
00:01:47 Speaker 01: their assistance during the audit. I'd
00:01:48 Speaker 02: especially like to thank Garrett, Sue,
00:01:50 Speaker 02: Mary Lou, and the rest of
00:01:52 Speaker 02: the finance team. Preparation of the
00:01:54 Speaker 02: financial statements, including all the disclosures.
00:01:56 Speaker 02: and the notes is the responsibility
00:01:58 Speaker 02: of your management team. Although we
00:02:00 Speaker 02: can assist in formatting and making
00:02:03 Speaker 02: suggestions on the wording, all the
00:02:04 Speaker 02: numbers are provided by your management
00:02:06 Speaker 02: team from the accounting records of
00:02:07 Speaker 02: the county. If you have any
00:02:09 Speaker 02: questions during the presentation, I would
00:02:11 Speaker 02: be happy to stop my presentation
00:02:12 Speaker 02: and answer them as we go,
00:02:14 Speaker 02: or you can save them until
00:02:17 Speaker 02: the end. The first item we'll
00:02:19 Speaker 02: be going through is the letter
00:02:22 Speaker 02: that goes along with the draft
00:02:24 Speaker 02: financial statements. This is a
00:02:26 Speaker 02: required communication under Canadian auditing standards,
00:02:27 Speaker 02: so the content of this letter
00:02:30 Speaker 02: will seem very similar to prior
00:02:34 Speaker 02: years. The financial statements need to
00:02:36 Speaker 02: be approved by council before MNP
00:02:38 Speaker 02: can issue a final audit report,
00:02:39 Speaker 02: and that is why the statements
00:02:42 Speaker 02: in the other package are unsigned
00:02:45 Speaker 02: at this time. For us to
00:02:47 Speaker 02: issue final statements, they need to
00:02:48 Speaker 02: be approved, and then management signs
00:02:50 Speaker 02: a representation letter, and we finish
00:02:52 Speaker 02: subsequent event work up to. the
00:02:55 Speaker 02: date that they are approved. Materiality
00:02:58 Speaker 02: remained unchanged from planning at six
00:03:01 Speaker 02: million dollars. No suspected, actual, or
00:03:02 Speaker 02: alleged fraud came to our attention
00:03:04 Speaker 02: during the audit. Should you become
00:03:06 Speaker 02: aware of any, please reach out
00:03:08 Speaker 02: to us directly. We did not
00:03:09 Speaker 02: find any deficiencies in the internal
00:03:11 Speaker 02: controls that we tested during the
00:03:14 Speaker 02: audit. If I keep moving on,
00:03:17 Speaker 02: I'm just going to continue with
00:03:20 Speaker 02: a few highlights. I can confirm
00:03:21 Speaker 02: that we are in. I can
00:03:22 Speaker 02: confirm that we are independent. There
00:03:26 Speaker 02: is a detailed letter in Appendix
00:03:28 Speaker 02: A that outlines our communication in
00:03:29 Speaker 02: regards to that under Canadian auditing
00:03:31 Speaker 02: standards, but I won't go into
00:03:32 Speaker 02: it in detail. We are independent
00:03:35 Speaker 02: and therefore can issue an independent
00:03:37 Speaker 02: auditor's report. And there were no
00:03:38 Speaker 02: unadjusted differences that were identified during
00:03:40 Speaker 02: the audit, so there is no
00:03:43 Speaker 02: schedule of unadjusted differences included in
00:03:45 Speaker 02: this package. Does anyone have any
00:03:46 Speaker 02: questions about this required communication before
00:03:49 Speaker 02: we move on to the statements
00:03:50 Speaker 02: themselves? So I'll just look around.
00:03:52 Speaker 02: the room to see if anybody
00:03:59 Speaker 02: has any questions at this point.
00:04:01 Speaker 02: Seeing none, please carry on. Thank
00:04:03 Speaker 02: you. Okay, so we're going to
00:04:05 Speaker 02: look at the consolidated statement of
00:04:08 Speaker 02: financial statements, starting with the independence
00:04:10 Speaker 02: audit report. Our audit opinion is
00:04:11 Speaker 02: appears before the financial statements, and
00:04:14 Speaker 02: it's the only part of this
00:04:15 Speaker 02: package that belongs to us, or
00:04:16 Speaker 02: part of the statements that belongs
00:04:18 Speaker 02: to us. The statements are management's,
00:04:20 Speaker 02: as I already went over. and
00:04:22 Speaker 02: the audit opinion belongs to MNP.
00:04:23 Speaker 02: It is an audit opinion and
00:04:24 Speaker 02: is the highest level of assurance
00:04:27 Speaker 02: that can be provided by a
00:04:30 Speaker 02: public accountant. In second paragraph under
00:04:31 Speaker 02: opinion, is where we say that
00:04:34 Speaker 02: in our opinion, the financial statements
00:04:35 Speaker 02: present fairly in all material respects
00:04:39 Speaker 02: the financial position of the county
00:04:40 Speaker 02: as at December 31, 2025,
00:04:43 Speaker 02: for the year ended in accordance
00:04:44 Speaker 02: with Canadian public sector accounting standards.
00:04:45 Speaker 02: Therefore, it is a clean audit
00:04:47 Speaker 02: opinion, and we had no issues
00:04:49 Speaker 02: or concerns. that came to our
00:04:50 Speaker 02: attention during the audit. In
00:04:52 Speaker 02: the middle of the report, it
00:04:54 Speaker 02: highlights management's responsibility for the financial
00:04:55 Speaker 02: statements, and at the bottom of
00:04:57 Speaker 02: this page, it also highlights those
00:04:59 Speaker 02: charged with governance. In this case,
00:05:02 Speaker 02: council are responsible for overseeing the
00:05:04 Speaker 02: county's financial reporting process. On the
00:05:06 Speaker 02: next page, it details the responsibilities
00:05:08 Speaker 02: of the auditor, which I won't
00:05:10 Speaker 02: go into in detail. So, if
00:05:11 Speaker 02: there's no questions about the audit
00:05:15 Speaker 02: opinion itself, we'll move on to
00:05:17 Speaker 02: the statement of financial position. On
00:05:18 Speaker 02: page four of the financial statement
00:05:20 Speaker 02: is the statement of financial position
00:05:23 Speaker 02: or balance sheet. It presents the
00:05:24 Speaker 02: county's financial state assets and liabilities
00:05:29 Speaker 02: at a point in time on
00:05:32 Speaker 02: December 31st, 2025. Financial assets totaled
00:05:34 Speaker 02: 130 million dollars, with 118 million
00:05:36 Speaker 02: of that in cash and investments.
00:05:38 Speaker 02: You will notice that cash decreased
00:05:39 Speaker 02: compared to last year, and that
00:05:41 Speaker 02: was due to timing of deferred
00:05:43 Speaker 02: revenue that had been on hand
00:05:44 Speaker 02: at the end of last year,
00:05:47 Speaker 02: but was. spent during the year.
00:05:48 Speaker 02: So basically, you're holding less provincial
00:05:49 Speaker 02: funding in the bank at the
00:05:52 Speaker 02: end of 2025 because you used
00:05:59 Speaker 02: it in 2025 compared to last
00:06:02 Speaker 02: year. Liabilities totaled 94 million, and
00:06:05 Speaker 02: included in that is accounts. Sorry,
00:06:06 Speaker 02: included in that is 40.9 million
00:06:08 Speaker 02: in normal trade payables and accrued
00:06:11 Speaker 02: liabilities that were paid subsequent to
00:06:13 Speaker 02: year end. There's also 36.5 million.
00:06:15 Speaker 02: in deferred revenue, which is broken
00:06:16 Speaker 02: down in the continuity schedule on
00:06:20 Speaker 02: page 30 of the financial statements.
00:06:23 Speaker 02: Within that schedule of deferred revenue,
00:06:26 Speaker 02: you'll see that there's 24.5 million
00:06:28 Speaker 02: in unspent development charges and 8
00:06:30 Speaker 02: million unspent Canada Community Building funds,
00:06:32 Speaker 02: previously referred to as gas tax,
00:06:34 Speaker 02: that are available to be spent
00:06:36 Speaker 02: in future years. These are really
00:06:37 Speaker 02: more like reserves, but because they
00:06:39 Speaker 02: are legislated, they don't get recorded
00:06:43 Speaker 02: as revenue until they're actually used.
00:06:47 Speaker 02: to finance projects or unspent. There
00:06:50 Speaker 02: is also eleven million dollars received
00:06:52 Speaker 02: late in twenty twenty four for
00:06:54 Speaker 02: Rockward Terrace in advance of expenditures
00:06:56 Speaker 02: being incurred. Since those were spent
00:06:59 Speaker 02: in twenty twenty five because the
00:07:06 Speaker 02: Rockward Terrace project proceeded, that's why
00:07:07 Speaker 02: deferred revenue decreased so much. Total
00:07:11 Speaker 02: assets of one hundred thirty million
00:07:13 Speaker 02: less. liabilities of thirty of ninety-four
00:07:16 Speaker 02: million comes to the net financial
00:07:18 Speaker 02: assets of thirty-six million. Below that,
00:07:19 Speaker 02: you'll see the non-financial assets increase
00:07:21 Speaker 02: to three hundred and seven point
00:07:23 Speaker 02: one million, and this includes
00:07:27 Speaker 02: the tangible capital assets, which are
00:07:29 Speaker 02: the linear infrastructure, roads, buildings, vehicles,
00:07:31 Speaker 02: and that increased to three hundred
00:07:34 Speaker 02: five point four million in the
00:07:36 Speaker 02: year. The bottom of this comes
00:07:38 Speaker 02: to the accumulated surplus of three
00:07:39 Speaker 02: hundred forty-three million. 343 million. It
00:07:41 Speaker 02: is the equity of the council
00:07:43 Speaker 02: and includes both monetary assets and
00:07:46 Speaker 02: your physical assets. The detailed breakdown
00:07:47 Speaker 02: can be seen in note six,
00:07:49 Speaker 02: accumulated surplus, and this is where
00:07:51 Speaker 02: you can also see that the
00:07:54 Speaker 02: reserve balance is 65.5 million because
00:07:56 Speaker 02: that equity number includes your reserves.
00:08:00 Speaker 02: On the next page is the
00:08:02 Speaker 02: consolidated statement of operations and accumulated
00:08:04 Speaker 02: surplus. It the statement of operations
00:08:06 Speaker 02: is the transactions for the year.
00:08:08 Speaker 02: Revenue include all external revenues for
00:08:11 Speaker 02: both. operating and capital. You can
00:08:14 Speaker 02: see that total revenue for 2025
00:08:16 Speaker 02: was 213 million. Included in this
00:08:18 Speaker 02: is taxation, fees and user charges,
00:08:20 Speaker 02: government transfers, and other income. If
00:08:22 Speaker 02: we look at government transfers for
00:08:25 Speaker 02: a moment, you will see that
00:08:27 Speaker 02: the actual of 106 million was
00:08:32 Speaker 02: lower than the budgeted amount of
00:08:35 Speaker 02: 113.8 million. A lot of this
00:08:38 Speaker 02: relates to the Canada-wide child care.
00:08:41 Speaker 02: Canada-wide childcare funding coming from the
00:08:45 Speaker 02: province, so it's sometimes referred to
00:08:46 Speaker 02: as Cwelk or Welk. Basically, the
00:08:47 Speaker 02: province sent funding amounts that they
00:08:49 Speaker 02: were willing to give up to,
00:08:51 Speaker 02: and they cash flowed a lot
00:08:52 Speaker 02: of it. But it wasn't used
00:08:54 Speaker 02: in 2025, and since it wasn't
00:08:55 Speaker 02: used, it can't be recognized as
00:08:57 Speaker 02: revenue. But that budget was based
00:08:59 Speaker 02: on that maximum funding that was
00:09:02 Speaker 02: available to centers should they take
00:09:03 Speaker 02: advantage of all of the spots
00:09:05 Speaker 02: and one-time startup funding. That's partly
00:09:07 Speaker 02: why I. That's partly why accounts
00:09:09 Speaker 02: payable was so high on the
00:09:12 Speaker 02: balance sheet. Is that because that
00:09:16 Speaker 02: money was cash flowed and not
00:09:18 Speaker 02: used? It is due back to
00:09:19 Speaker 02: the province. The other item is
00:09:21 Speaker 02: other income budget of twenty three
00:09:23 Speaker 02: million compared to actual of fifteen
00:09:24 Speaker 02: point nine million. A lot of
00:09:26 Speaker 02: that was there was it was
00:09:28 Speaker 02: anticipated to be using a lot
00:09:30 Speaker 02: more development charges for capital in
00:09:31 Speaker 02: twenty twenty five, but timelines changed
00:09:33 Speaker 02: on some of those capital projects,
00:09:39 Speaker 02: and so since those development
00:09:41 Speaker 02: charges weren't used in 2025, they
00:09:44 Speaker 02: cannot be recognized as revenue. Expenses,
00:09:46 Speaker 02: including operating costs, and sorry, expenses
00:09:49 Speaker 02: include operating costs, amortization, and accretion
00:09:54 Speaker 02: for asset retirement obligation. It does
00:09:57 Speaker 02: not include capital or reserve transfers.
00:09:59 Speaker 02: Total expenses for 2025 were 185.8
00:10:02 Speaker 02: million dollars. Budget expenses and actual
00:10:03 Speaker 02: expenses are significantly different because the
00:10:07 Speaker 02: actual expenses include amortization. of those
00:10:09 Speaker 02: tangible capital assets as required by
00:10:10 Speaker 02: public sector accounting standards. Amortization is
00:10:12 Speaker 02: a non-cash amount for accounting purposes,
00:10:14 Speaker 02: which is the estimate of the
00:10:15 Speaker 02: wear and tear on physical assets
00:10:17 Speaker 02: from their use, and it's based
00:10:19 Speaker 02: on the historical cost of the
00:10:21 Speaker 02: assets that they're set up in
00:10:24 Speaker 02: the balance sheet. The budget does
00:10:26 Speaker 02: not include amortization, so if amortization
00:10:27 Speaker 02: was removed from actual expenses, then
00:10:32 Speaker 02: the actual expenses would be 171
00:10:33 Speaker 02: million, which is more in line
00:10:36 Speaker 02: with the total budgeted expenses. for
00:10:39 Speaker 02: 2025, total revenue less total expenses
00:10:41 Speaker 02: comes to the annual surplus of
00:10:44 Speaker 02: 27.2 million. The 27.2 million annual
00:10:46 Speaker 02: surplus presented on this statement is
00:10:47 Speaker 02: not the operating surplus. The annual
00:10:49 Speaker 02: surplus on this statement focuses on
00:10:51 Speaker 02: the long term. It is the
00:10:54 Speaker 02: amount of external revenue raised during
00:10:55 Speaker 02: the year after paying all operating
00:10:57 Speaker 02: costs and to cover amortization. The
00:10:59 Speaker 02: annual surplus should always be a
00:11:04 Speaker 02: positive amount to be able to
00:11:05 Speaker 02: make debt. payments and also be
00:11:07 Speaker 02: large enough to fund capital asset
00:11:10 Speaker 02: purchases. So you don't see on
00:11:11 Speaker 02: this statement what would be the
00:11:13 Speaker 02: operating surplus for the year. So
00:11:16 Speaker 02: on April 23rd, there was a
00:11:17 Speaker 02: report to council that reported a
00:11:20 Speaker 02: projected operating surplus of 1.8 million
00:11:25 Speaker 02: that was transferred into reserve, and
00:11:27 Speaker 02: that didn't change significantly as a
00:11:29 Speaker 02: result of the audit. The next
00:11:31 Speaker 02: statement. is the statement of changes
00:11:33 Speaker 02: in net financial assets, and it
00:11:35 Speaker 02: takes that annual surplus for the
00:11:37 Speaker 02: year of 27 million from the
00:11:39 Speaker 02: previous page, and adjusts for amortization
00:11:40 Speaker 02: and the actual amount that was
00:11:42 Speaker 02: spent on capital assets during the
00:11:44 Speaker 02: year. So during the year, there
00:11:47 Speaker 02: was 51 million in capital assets
00:11:49 Speaker 02: acquired. So the statement comes down
00:11:50 Speaker 02: to a decrease in net financial
00:11:53 Speaker 02: assets of 7.2 million, which agrees
00:11:55 Speaker 02: to the change in the assets
00:11:57 Speaker 02: on the balance sheet. The 2025
00:11:58 Speaker 02: budget had anticipated. Five budget had
00:12:00 Speaker 02: anticipated that Rockwood Terrace project would
00:12:02 Speaker 02: be further along at the end
00:12:05 Speaker 02: of 2025, and that is why
00:12:09 Speaker 02: the budgeted decrease in net financial
00:12:11 Speaker 02: assets was so much larger at
00:12:14 Speaker 02: 64 million. The project had anticipated
00:12:15 Speaker 02: incurring both external debt and utilizing
00:12:16 Speaker 02: reserves, and so you can also
00:12:18 Speaker 02: see that in Note Eight of
00:12:22 Speaker 02: the budget. So if we were
00:12:24 Speaker 02: to look at Note Eight in
00:12:26 Speaker 02: the budget, you would see that
00:12:28 Speaker 02: there was budgeted reserve transfers and
00:12:31 Speaker 02: debt. Transfers and and receiving more
00:12:32 Speaker 02: debt, and since that didn't happen
00:12:34 Speaker 02: because the capital expenditures weren't incurred,
00:12:36 Speaker 02: that's also why there wasn't as
00:12:38 Speaker 02: large a decrease in net financial
00:12:40 Speaker 02: assets in the year. So the
00:12:41 Speaker 02: difference to budget is just reflecting
00:12:42 Speaker 02: changing in timelines. I've tried to
00:12:44 Speaker 02: keep the presentation at a high
00:12:46 Speaker 02: level overview, so I'm not going
00:12:51 Speaker 02: to go into the rest of
00:12:52 Speaker 02: the statements in more detail unless
00:12:54 Speaker 02: anyone has any specific questions. So
00:12:55 Speaker 02: I guess, any questions? Okay, thank
00:12:57 Speaker 02: you. very much. I'll put it
00:12:59 Speaker 02: out to committee. The whole members,
00:13:01 Speaker 02: if they have any questions about
00:13:04 Speaker 02: any of the other details that
00:13:07 Speaker 02: were already in the information or
00:13:08 Speaker 03: what was presented today, we'll go
00:13:12 Speaker 03: to Councillor Greg. Thank you for
00:13:14 Speaker 03: the presentation this morning. And this
00:13:18 Speaker 03: pro, this these two questions are
00:13:22 Speaker 03: probably more for staff. But the
00:13:25 Speaker 03: one item was government transfers. It
00:13:26 Speaker 03: was budgeted at forty-two million. The
00:13:30 Speaker 03: actual is. thirty-six million. Twenty-four was
00:13:32 Speaker 03: thirty-two million. Really, the answer here
00:13:33 Speaker 03: just supports me when we're looking
00:13:35 Speaker 03: at the the report later. Our
00:13:40 Speaker 03: corporate financial update as to that
00:13:42 Speaker 03: difference between the forty-two million and
00:13:47 Speaker 03: the thirty-six million. I presume it's
00:13:48 Speaker 03: just government transfers. So I guess
00:13:50 Speaker 03: perhaps that's maybe more to Garrett
00:13:55 Speaker 03: and Sue just to reply to
00:13:57 Speaker 03: that. Okay, so I'll invite. Manager
00:13:59 Speaker 04: Reed to come to the lectern
00:14:01 Speaker 04: and provide a response. Good morning,
00:14:05 Speaker 04: through the warden. Yeah, that's a
00:14:07 Speaker 04: good question. So that is the
00:14:10 Speaker 04: social services grant that you're referencing
00:14:11 Speaker 04: on page twenty-eight, or sorry, page
00:14:13 Speaker 04: twenty. That is our Seawell grant.
00:14:13 Speaker 04: So we don't know our grant
00:14:15 Speaker 04: funding when we develop the budget.
00:14:17 Speaker 04: Usually, it comes out somehow. They
00:14:19 Speaker 04: know and they do it about
00:14:20 Speaker 04: a week after we pass the
00:14:23 Speaker 04: budget, and then Tara Cockrell. brings
00:14:24 Speaker 04: the report back, saying, "Here's the
00:14:25 Speaker 04: changes that we're proposing based on
00:14:27 Speaker 04: the changes in funding. 2025 was
00:14:31 Speaker 04: the first year of us being
00:14:33 Speaker 04: fully within the Seawell program, so
00:14:34 Speaker 04: it was a complete overhaul in
00:14:36 Speaker 04: our funding. The 42 million dollar
00:14:38 Speaker 04: budget is still pretty close to
00:14:40 Speaker 04: the overall funding they provided, but
00:14:42 Speaker 04: there were quite a few buckets
00:14:44 Speaker 04: that we could not use in
00:14:46 Speaker 04: the year. The first two that
00:14:48 Speaker 04: are top of mind is startup
00:14:50 Speaker 04: and infrastructure funding that was available
00:14:53 Speaker 04: to build." new childcare centers or
00:14:54 Speaker 04: enhance childcare centers, but there was
00:14:55 Speaker 04: no increase in our licenses attached
00:14:56 Speaker 04: to that funding. So the operators
00:14:58 Speaker 04: kind of had the opinion that
00:14:59 Speaker 04: why would we build this space
00:15:01 Speaker 04: if if the province isn't going
00:15:02 Speaker 04: to provide us with the seawell
00:15:03 Speaker 04: funding? So we weren't able to
00:15:04 Speaker 04: spend any of it. So the
00:15:06 Speaker 04: province has cash flowed it. We're
00:15:08 Speaker 04: going to give that back to
00:15:10 Speaker 04: the province because we had no
00:15:11 Speaker 04: use for it. The other is
00:15:12 Speaker 04: because it was done mid year,
00:15:14 Speaker 04: and Tara and her team were
00:15:16 Speaker 04: were scrambling to get it rolled
00:15:18 Speaker 04: out to as many providers as
00:15:19 Speaker 04: we could with our licenses. Providers
00:15:20 Speaker 04: that we could with our license
00:15:22 Speaker 04: counts, we didn't spend our full
00:15:24 Speaker 04: C well allocation for the operating
00:15:26 Speaker 04: funding either because by the time
00:15:28 Speaker 04: we got them enrolled in the
00:15:30 Speaker 04: new system, we were already you
00:15:33 Speaker 04: know three four months into the
00:15:36 Speaker 04: year and working through that. There
00:15:37 Speaker 04: was also some changes within our
00:15:41 Speaker 04: non C well funding for childcare
00:15:43 Speaker 04: as a result of the increased
00:15:44 Speaker 04: C well funding. So one of
00:15:45 Speaker 04: the major things we spend money
00:15:46 Speaker 04: on is is fee subsidy for
00:15:48 Speaker 04: parents that can't afford the full
00:15:50 Speaker 04: rate of daycare. and that's a
00:15:52 Speaker 04: formula that we have based on
00:15:53 Speaker 04: income and based on cost of
00:15:55 Speaker 04: childcare. How much that we reimburse
00:15:57 Speaker 04: for a given family, and that's
00:16:00 Speaker 04: administered by the county. As more
00:16:02 Speaker 04: families in Gray County get on
00:16:04 Speaker 04: the SeaWok program and are paying
00:16:05 Speaker 04: twenty-two dollars a day or twenty-two
00:16:07 Speaker 04: dollars a day, more families become
00:16:08 Speaker 04: ineligible for that fee subsidy because
00:16:09 Speaker 04: their overall daycare costs have gone
00:16:12 Speaker 04: down. So that is a fair
00:16:14 Speaker 04: number. I think it actually might
00:16:16 Speaker 04: be a bit higher. I think
00:16:18 Speaker 04: that variance you mentioned is about
00:16:20 Speaker 04: five point seven million dollars. 5.7
00:16:25 Speaker 04: million dollars budget to actual. I
00:16:26 Speaker 04: think we're actually giving back about
00:16:29 Speaker 03: just north of six million dollars
00:16:31 Speaker 03: to the province of child care
00:16:33 Speaker 03: child care funding that we are
00:16:35 Speaker 03: not able to use. Okay, thank
00:16:38 Speaker 03: you for that response. And maybe
00:16:40 Speaker 03: don't go too far because really
00:16:43 Speaker 03: my questions do just support me.
00:16:45 Speaker 03: Looking at the one third of
00:16:49 Speaker 03: the way through the year 2026,
00:16:54 Speaker 03: the auditors did point out in
00:16:58 Speaker 03: page 29. Out in page twenty
00:17:01 Speaker 03: nine, the notes to the consolidated
00:17:03 Speaker 03: financial statements show year over year.
00:17:06 Speaker 03: So just a question of there's
00:17:07 Speaker 03: growth in the transportation salaries, which
00:17:09 Speaker 03: is probably explained by the overtime
00:17:12 Speaker 03: accumulated during the heavy winters. Beside
00:17:17 Speaker 04: that is human services went from
00:17:20 Speaker 04: sixty seven point eight million to
00:17:24 Speaker 04: from sixty two point eight million.
00:17:25 Speaker 04: So just wondering if you could.
00:17:27 Speaker 04: Millions. So, just wondering if you
00:17:28 Speaker 04: could explain a little more so
00:17:31 Speaker 04: on, particularly the human services salaries
00:17:32 Speaker 04: line. There. Yep, through the warden.
00:17:34 Speaker 04: Correct. The transportation will be a
00:17:36 Speaker 04: result of increased overtime cost and
00:17:39 Speaker 04: wages as a result of the
00:17:44 Speaker 04: harsh winter, which we talked about
00:17:46 Speaker 04: in our in our year end
00:17:48 Speaker 04: transfer report. Human services. So, as
00:17:50 Speaker 04: a reminder to council, that's made
00:17:51 Speaker 04: up of the housing department, social
00:17:55 Speaker 04: services, long. Social services, long-term care,
00:17:56 Speaker 04: and paramedic services. And you're correct;
00:17:59 Speaker 04: that increased 2025 over 2024 by
00:18:01 Speaker 04: 4.9 million, which would be an
00:18:04 Speaker 04: increase of about eight percent—a little,
00:18:07 Speaker 04: little bit less than that. So
00:18:09 Speaker 04: obviously, we would expect it to
00:18:13 Speaker 04: increase every year with collective agreement
00:18:16 Speaker 04: wages and cost of living adjustments
00:18:18 Speaker 04: for non-union staff. But within the
00:18:19 Speaker 04: paramedic and long-term care departments, there
00:18:22 Speaker 04: were also increased staffing. So I'll.
00:18:24 Speaker 04: start with paramedic services. In we
00:18:27 Speaker 04: have our deployment enhancement plan where
00:18:28 Speaker 04: we're adding shifts. In 2024, we
00:18:31 Speaker 04: added two shifts, which requires eight
00:18:31 Speaker 04: full time paramedics plus backfill. But
00:18:33 Speaker 04: because of how the funding works,
00:18:35 Speaker 04: we don't start that enhancement until
00:18:37 Speaker 04: July first in the year. So
00:18:38 Speaker 04: when you're looking at 2024, you'll
00:18:39 Speaker 04: only have half a year of
00:18:42 Speaker 04: actuals on those enhancements, and then
00:18:44 Speaker 04: in 2025 they'll been here for
00:18:46 Speaker 04: the full year, and then in
00:18:50 Speaker 04: 20 For the full year, and
00:18:52 Speaker 04: then in 2025, July 1st, there
00:18:55 Speaker 04: was another enhancement to add one
00:18:59 Speaker 04: more shift, and again, that would
00:19:01 Speaker 04: have started July 1st. So, when
00:19:04 Speaker 04: we're looking at the paramedic increase,
00:19:06 Speaker 04: it's partially due to collective agreement
00:19:08 Speaker 04: wages increases and non-union wage increases,
00:19:10 Speaker 04: but it's really that we've added
00:19:12 Speaker 04: essentially three shifts to our operations.
00:19:14 Speaker 04: And again, the 2024 wouldn't include
00:19:16 Speaker 04: the full cost of the 2020
00:19:17 Speaker 04: 2024 enhancement because we started halfway
00:19:19 Speaker 04: through the year. Similarly to long-term
00:19:20 Speaker 04: care, council remember that in 2024,
00:19:22 Speaker 04: the long-term care department had a
00:19:24 Speaker 04: large surplus as there was an
00:19:26 Speaker 04: increase in grant funding. Part of
00:19:28 Speaker 04: that was case mix index. Part
00:19:30 Speaker 04: of it was also increase in
00:19:31 Speaker 04: direct care funding from the province.
00:19:33 Speaker 04: We did not know of that
00:19:35 Speaker 04: increase until part way through the
00:19:37 Speaker 04: year. So same thing, we then
00:19:38 Speaker 04: go out and need more staff
00:19:41 Speaker 04: to to meet those direct care
00:19:42 Speaker 04: hours, which are then funded by
00:19:44 Speaker 04: the province through that that grant
00:19:46 Speaker 04: program. but when you're just looking
00:19:48 Speaker 04: at the salary and benefits line,
00:19:50 Speaker 04: yes, it will show a big
00:19:54 Speaker 04: increase. But then, if we're looking
00:19:56 Speaker 04: at that same those two same
00:19:59 Speaker 04: pages, you'll also see an increase
00:20:02 Speaker 04: in government transfers as well for
00:20:04 Speaker 04: that department, as there's now more
00:20:09 Speaker 04: long term care funding to cover
00:20:12 Speaker 04: off those wage increases, as well
00:20:15 Speaker 01: as more fifty fifty funding as
00:20:18 Speaker 01: part of the paramedic services grant
00:20:20 Speaker 01: formula. So it is partially increase
00:20:21 Speaker 01: in just the cost of our
00:20:22 Speaker 01: staffing, but those two. very large
00:20:23 Speaker 01: departments did have staffing enhancements in
00:20:26 Speaker 01: 2024 and 2025, which will impact
00:20:27 Speaker 01: those numbers. Okay, thank you for
00:20:29 Speaker 01: that answer. I'll look around if
00:20:30 Speaker 01: there are any other questions. Okay.
00:20:32 Speaker 01: Well, I'm not seeing any then,
00:20:34 Speaker 01: and we do have a motion
00:20:37 Speaker 01: that has been moved and seconded
00:20:38 Speaker 01: that is on the floor, so
00:20:40 Speaker 01: I'll call the vote for that.
00:20:42 Speaker 01: Then, all those in favor, and
00:20:44 Speaker 01: that motion is. carried. Thank you
00:20:46 Speaker 01: very much. We appreciate you coming
00:20:48 Speaker 01: and presenting the material to us
00:20:49 Speaker 01: today. And thank you to Manager
00:20:54 Speaker 01: Reed as well for providing the
00:20:55 Speaker 01: extra information. At this point in
00:20:58 Speaker 01: time, we will look at our
00:21:02 Speaker 01: list in Item Six, the Consent
00:21:07 Speaker 01: Agenda, and I'll put a call
00:21:12 Speaker 01: out for any of those items.
00:21:14 Speaker 01: There are five items listed. Any
00:21:18 Speaker 01: that any committee, the whole member
00:21:20 Speaker 01: wishes to pull for a separate
00:21:22 Speaker 01: discussion. Hey, Councilor McQueen. Thank you,
00:21:23 Speaker 01: Madam Warden. I wish to
00:21:24 Speaker 01: pull six. A. Okay, so six
00:21:26 Speaker 01: A has been pulled, and Councillor
00:21:29 Speaker 01: Gray. Six E, please. Six E
00:21:31 Speaker 01: has been pulled. Any others? Okay,
00:21:33 Speaker 01: so seeing no further hands, then
00:21:36 Speaker 01: it is recommended that the following
00:21:37 Speaker 01: consented items be received, and that
00:21:39 Speaker 01: staff be authorized to take the
00:21:42 Speaker 01: actions necessary to give effect to
00:21:45 Speaker 01: the recommendation. To give effect to
00:21:46 Speaker 01: the recommendations in the staff reports,
00:21:49 Speaker 01: and that the correspondence be supported
00:21:51 Speaker 01: or received for information as recommended
00:21:53 Speaker 01: in the consent agenda, noting that
00:21:55 Speaker 01: we will look at items six
00:21:58 Speaker 01: a and six e separately. May
00:22:00 Speaker 01: I ask for a mover and
00:22:03 Speaker 01: a seconder? Move by Councillor Kevany,
00:22:06 Speaker 01: seconded by Councillor Eccles. All those
00:22:09 Speaker 01: in favor? And that motion is
00:22:12 Speaker 01: carried. So we'll make sure we
00:22:15 Speaker 01: revisit those items after seven, section
00:22:17 Speaker 01: seven. So we will now move
00:22:20 Speaker 01: on to our. items for discussion.
00:22:22 Speaker 01: The first, the first one is
7.a EDTC-CW-09-26 Bruce-Dufferin-Grey-Wellington Regional Transit Study Update and Interim Recommendation
The report updates the Bruce Dufferin Grey Wellington Regional Transit Study, recommending Council endorse a contract extension to maintain existing GTR Route Two and Ghost services while reintroducing GTR Route Five from Owen Sound to Wyarton until 2026. This interim phase utilizes available OTIF funding and approved county budget allocations without requiring new capital, ensuring riders are not left without access during the study period which extends into fall for a draft plan presentation in 2027.
00:22:24 Speaker 01: item seven A. It is it's
00:22:26 Speaker 01: recommended that report E D T
00:22:29 Speaker 01: C C W zero nine twenty
00:22:31 Speaker 01: six regarding the Bruce Dufferin Grey
00:22:34 Speaker 01: Wellington Regional Transit Study update and
00:22:37 Speaker 01: interim recommendations be received, and that
00:22:40 Speaker 01: Council endorse the contract extension of
00:22:43 Speaker 01: the G T R route two
00:22:44 Speaker 01: and Ghost to and reintroduce the
00:22:46 Speaker 01: G T. Reintroduce the GTR Route
00:22:48 Speaker 01: 5 from Owen Sound to Wyarton
00:22:50 Speaker 01: until a decision can be made
00:22:53 Speaker 01: on a unified regional transit network
00:22:54 Speaker 05: and subject to funding approval from
00:22:57 Speaker 05: the province, and that all service
00:22:58 Speaker 05: be funded within the approved 2026
00:23:01 Speaker 05: county budget allocations and supported by
00:23:02 Speaker 05: the Ontario Transit Investment Fund, known
00:23:04 Speaker 05: as OTIF. May I ask for
00:23:05 Speaker 05: a mover and a seconder? I've
00:23:07 Speaker 05: got a move by Councillor Hutchison,
00:23:08 Speaker 05: seconded by Councillor Dobrée. Seconded by
00:23:09 Speaker 05: Councillor Dobrin, it's now on the
00:23:11 Speaker 05: floor for discussion. And so, oh,
00:23:12 Speaker 05: okay, we will begin with Director
00:23:14 Speaker 05: Myers. Thank you. I'm just buying
00:23:16 Speaker 05: Stephanie a moment to come into
00:23:18 Speaker 05: the room. I just wanted to
00:23:19 Speaker 05: make a note that this is
00:23:29 Speaker 05: the same, almost the same report
00:23:31 Speaker 05: that was on the agenda in
00:23:32 Speaker 05: May. We pulled it off the
00:23:33 Speaker 05: report because we were in the
00:23:35 Speaker 05: midst of conversations with the province.
00:23:37 Speaker 05: But after last week, we finally
00:23:39 Speaker 05: got some answers, which is good.
00:23:41 Speaker 05: So we are back with an
00:23:42 Speaker 05: amendment to that report, and Stephanie
00:23:44 Speaker 05: is going to present. it, so
00:23:47 Speaker 05: I will hand it over to
00:23:49 Speaker 05: her. Good morning. Oh, all right.
00:23:51 Speaker 05: So, as Savannah said, I will
00:23:54 Speaker 05: be providing you with a little
00:23:56 Speaker 06: bit of an update. So, I'll
00:23:58 Speaker 06: begin with the overall study update,
00:23:59 Speaker 06: and then I'll move into the
00:24:02 Speaker 06: intern service recommendation for council's consideration.
00:24:04 Speaker 06: So, the purpose of this report
00:24:06 Speaker 06: is to provide you with an
00:24:08 Speaker 06: update regarding the Bruce Dufferin Gray
00:24:10 Speaker 06: Wellington Regional Transit Study. and recommend
00:24:12 Speaker 06: interim measures to maintain and introduce
00:24:14 Speaker 06: temporary service while the regional working
00:24:17 Speaker 06: group continues to investigate potential of
00:24:19 Speaker 06: a unified regional transit network. Since
00:24:21 Speaker 06: our March council presentation, the project
00:24:24 Speaker 06: team has continued to work alongside
00:24:25 Speaker 06: Dylan Consulting towards a draft unified
00:24:28 Speaker 06: regional transit plan. In the past
00:24:30 Speaker 06: couple of months, several developments have
00:24:31 Speaker 06: unfolded in parallel to this work,
00:24:33 Speaker 06: including the ask from the Western
00:24:36 Speaker 06: Ontario Wardens Caucus to establish a
00:24:38 Speaker 06: regional transit authority, which is model.
00:24:40 Speaker 06: Which is modeled after this work
00:24:42 Speaker 06: that we're doing here today. So,
00:24:44 Speaker 06: following those discussions, as Savannah has
00:24:45 Speaker 06: discussed, we will continue this great
00:24:47 Speaker 06: work, and we will come back
00:24:50 Speaker 06: to you soon. As staff understand
00:24:52 Speaker 06: it, the Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Wellington
00:24:54 Speaker 06: Regional Transit Study is the
00:24:56 Speaker 06: largest of its kind in the
00:24:58 Speaker 06: province, which contributes to its overall
00:25:00 Speaker 06: complexity. Project partners are recommending more
00:25:02 Speaker 06: time is given to the current
00:25:05 Speaker 06: study phase to ensure the best
00:25:07 Speaker 06: possible information is available for council.
00:25:10 Speaker 06: Information is available for councils and
00:25:12 Speaker 06: the Smart Board to make their
00:25:15 Speaker 06: decision on a unified regional transit
00:25:16 Speaker 06: network. Staff suggests taking the summer
00:25:18 Speaker 06: to gather more information to
00:25:20 Speaker 06: supplement the draft plan through a
00:25:22 Speaker 06: request for information regarding technology and
00:25:23 Speaker 06: operator interest to explore the requirements
00:25:26 Speaker 06: and potential of a unified rideshare
00:25:26 Speaker 06: bylaw. Staff will also continue to
00:25:29 Speaker 06: work alongside the MTO to better
00:25:31 Speaker 06: understand the OTIF program and gas
00:25:34 Speaker 06: tax tax opportunities and limitations, along
00:25:35 Speaker 06: with implications from changes. to Bill
00:25:38 Speaker 06: 98 and the Metro Links Act.
00:25:40 Speaker 06: As project partners have been going
00:25:42 Speaker 06: through the study, the need
00:25:46 Speaker 06: for further analysis regarding specialized transit
00:25:48 Speaker 06: has also been identified. With the
00:25:49 Speaker 06: support of OTIF, this will be
00:25:53 Speaker 06: explored in further detail as part
00:25:55 Speaker 06: of the final leg of our
00:25:57 Speaker 06: study. With more time and this
00:26:00 Speaker 06: additional information, the project team and
00:26:01 Speaker 06: Dylan Consulting would return this fall
00:26:02 Speaker 06: to present the draft plan and
00:26:05 Speaker 06: recommendations for information. At that time,
00:26:08 Speaker 06: staff will seek direction to include.
00:26:10 Speaker 06: budget allocations in the proposed draft
00:26:13 Speaker 06: 2027 budget for consideration. Final recommendations
00:26:16 Speaker 06: for decision would be brought forward
00:26:18 Speaker 06: to councils and the new smart
00:26:19 Speaker 06: board in 2027. I'll now turn
00:26:21 Speaker 06: to the interim service recommendations, which
00:26:23 Speaker 06: is intended to maintain continuity while
00:26:25 Speaker 06: the broader study work continues. So,
00:26:27 Speaker 06: as per the report we shared
00:26:30 Speaker 06: with you in November of 2025,
00:26:31 Speaker 06: the Grey Transit route from Dundalk
00:26:34 Speaker 06: to Orangeville and Guelph, Owen Sound,
00:26:36 Speaker 06: was extended from until August thirty
00:26:38 Speaker 06: first, twenty twenty six, to ensure
00:26:40 Speaker 06: service continuation during the study period.
00:26:42 Speaker 06: As the study period progresses, the
00:26:45 Speaker 06: project team is recommending a pre
00:26:47 Speaker 06: approval phase that sees the continuation
00:26:48 Speaker 06: of those existing routes, along with
00:26:51 Speaker 06: the reintroduction of GTR route five
00:26:52 Speaker 06: from Owen Sound to Wyarton, and
00:26:55 Speaker 06: a seasonal soluble beach service in
00:26:57 Speaker 06: twenty twenty seven, until a decision
00:26:59 Speaker 06: can be made on a unified
00:27:01 Speaker 06: transit network. All services would exist
00:27:03 Speaker 06: under the same operating and funding
00:27:06 Speaker 06: currently in place. Staff from the
00:27:08 Speaker 06: project partners, so Bruce County,
00:27:11 Speaker 06: Dufferin County, Grey, and Wellington, along
00:27:13 Speaker 06: with SMART, see value in these
00:27:14 Speaker 06: services and are aligned in their
00:27:17 Speaker 06: support of sustaining these operations during
00:27:20 Speaker 06: the study period and using the
00:27:23 Speaker 06: OTF funding to accommodate these extensions.
00:27:24 Speaker 06: As a pre-approval phase, the continuing
00:27:26 Speaker 06: the service ensures that riders are
00:27:29 Speaker 06: not left without access while long-term
00:27:32 Speaker 06: solutions are being considered and helps
00:27:34 Speaker 06: avoid a loss of ridership. It
00:27:37 Speaker 06: also provides. Bruce County with temporary
00:27:39 Speaker 06: service on a previously popular route,
00:27:41 Speaker 06: including coverage during peak seasons, until
00:27:43 Speaker 06: a recommendation for a permanent
00:27:46 Speaker 06: solution can be developed. The interim
00:27:47 Speaker 06: approach also helps leverage available OTIF
00:27:49 Speaker 06: funding by utilizing 2026 budget allocations
00:27:54 Speaker 07: from each county and pending OTIF
00:27:56 Speaker 07: approval from the province. There is
00:27:57 Speaker 07: no additional funding required to maintain
00:28:00 Speaker 07: this interim phase. Funding required for
00:28:03 Speaker 07: 2027 operations will be included in
00:28:05 Speaker 07: the annual budget. council consideration. So,
00:28:06 Speaker 07: in summary, the recommendation is to
00:28:08 Speaker 08: allow the study team more time
00:28:11 Speaker 08: to complete regional transit planning work,
00:28:12 Speaker 08: while using available funding to maintain
00:28:13 Speaker 08: temporary reintroductions and key services, so
00:28:16 Speaker 08: riders are not left without access
00:28:18 Speaker 08: during this decision-making period. Are there
00:28:20 Speaker 08: any questions? Okay, thank you very
00:28:20 Speaker 08: much, and we're going to start
00:28:23 Speaker 08: with Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very
00:28:25 Speaker 08: much, Ward Matrasov. I think the
00:28:27 Speaker 08: question I have is more along
00:28:28 Speaker 08: lines of the reintroduction of the
00:28:31 Speaker 08: GTR route five, and my question
00:28:33 Speaker 08: only is because if you can
00:28:34 Speaker 06: just refresh my memory as to
00:28:39 Speaker 06: how long it has been out
00:28:41 Speaker 06: of service, if we're reintroducing it,
00:28:43 Speaker 06: and two, it's out of service.
00:28:45 Speaker 06: We're putting it back into service.
00:28:48 Speaker 06: We're not a hundred percent sure
00:28:49 Speaker 06: it's going to continue service. That's
00:28:51 Speaker 06: the part where I'm I don't
00:28:54 Speaker 06: understand the logic in in redoing
00:28:56 Speaker 06: it for a short period of
00:28:57 Speaker 06: time when we're still discussing what
00:28:59 Speaker 06: the broader broader picture looks like.
00:29:04 Speaker 06: So, if you can just help
00:29:06 Speaker 06: me understand the logic there. Thank
00:29:07 Speaker 06: you, Your Worship. Thank you, Councilman
00:29:09 Speaker 06: Yasin. So, to answer your first
00:29:15 Speaker 06: question, it started October 2020 and
00:29:16 Speaker 06: went till December 2024. So, part
00:29:18 Speaker 09: of the logic is, as I
00:29:22 Speaker 09: mentioned, it was a really popular
00:29:23 Speaker 09: route, and right now, Bruce County
00:29:27 Speaker 09: is without service. So, it would
00:29:29 Speaker 09: support the Bruce County residents that
00:29:31 Speaker 09: are in need of a transit
00:29:33 Speaker 09: option. I do hear. your concerns,
00:29:37 Speaker 09: and I, I understand. But at
00:29:39 Speaker 09: the same time, there's also a
00:29:43 Speaker 09: need, and we are trying to
00:29:45 Speaker 09: service that need as well. And
00:29:46 Speaker 09: I see. Through you, Warden, just
00:29:48 Speaker 09: to build on that, and thank
00:29:50 Speaker 09: you for those explanations, Stephanie. So
00:29:52 Speaker 09: another, another item to the importance
00:29:55 Speaker 09: of the own sound to Wyarton
00:29:57 Speaker 09: route, more match sauce. I think
00:29:59 Speaker 09: provide an update. Match source. I
00:30:01 Speaker 09: think provided an update a couple
00:30:06 Speaker 09: months ago that we attended along
00:30:07 Speaker 09: with Bruce County Warden and CAO
00:30:10 Speaker 09: to the Chippewas and Awash, and
00:30:12 Speaker 09: they have a bus that provides
00:30:15 Speaker 09: a connection between Chippewas and Awash
00:30:17 Speaker 09: and Wyarton, and so this Owen
00:30:20 Speaker 09: Sound of Wyarton will allow them
00:30:22 Speaker 09: to get to Wyarton, but also
00:30:25 Speaker 09: to get to Owen Sound if
00:30:27 Speaker 09: if if needed as well. So
00:30:30 Speaker 09: that was an important connection for
00:30:32 Speaker 09: for them. So we see re.
00:30:34 Speaker 09: So we see reestablishing that not
00:30:36 Speaker 09: only provides the the Bruce County
00:30:38 Speaker 09: connection because again this is a
00:30:41 Speaker 09: a four partner partnership that's being
00:30:42 Speaker 09: done as part of this project
00:30:45 Speaker 09: and all the other three county
00:30:49 Speaker 09: partners have some sort of routes
00:30:50 Speaker 08: in them. This would provide that
00:30:53 Speaker 08: Bruce County connection in the interim
00:30:55 Speaker 08: until we finalize the study. When
00:30:57 Speaker 08: we look at where we're looking
00:31:00 Speaker 08: at the routes and other things.
00:31:02 Speaker 08: in terms of the long-term study,
00:31:03 Speaker 08: those those pieces will would still
00:31:07 Speaker 08: be part of what would be
00:31:08 Speaker 08: coming forward as as some of
00:31:09 Speaker 08: those recommendations. So, so we're confident
00:31:11 Speaker 08: that those would be part of
00:31:12 Speaker 08: the recommended network going forward as
00:31:13 Speaker 08: well. So, there's those are some
00:31:16 Speaker 08: of the considerations as to why
00:31:19 Speaker 08: why these are recommended. Okay, follow
00:31:19 Speaker 08: up, Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very
00:31:22 Speaker 08: much, Ward Matrasoff. So, just I
00:31:23 Speaker 08: think one main follow up is.
00:31:25 Speaker 08: where where are we on the
00:31:26 Speaker 08: timeline of the study completion? Just
00:31:34 Speaker 08: maybe help. We have the report
00:31:36 Speaker 08: suggesting that the funding is in
00:31:37 Speaker 08: place, that there's no extra capital
00:31:39 Speaker 08: costs or or funding costs needed
00:31:40 Speaker 05: from the county, but that it
00:31:43 Speaker 05: will be a budget discussion for
00:31:44 Speaker 05: 2027. And so I'm just trying
00:31:45 Speaker 05: to wonder: Do we know where
00:31:49 Speaker 05: we are on the project completion
00:31:50 Speaker 05: for the the study we're doing,
00:31:52 Speaker 05: and where are we at to
00:31:54 Speaker 05: the end of that? Because we've
00:31:55 Speaker 05: already had few discussions. We've already
00:31:57 Speaker 05: had a few discussions on what
00:31:58 Speaker 05: the 2027 budget's looking like, and
00:32:00 Speaker 05: as we keep having these discussions,
00:32:01 Speaker 05: it just impacts that. Thank you,
00:32:02 Speaker 05: thank you, Warden. Right now, the
00:32:05 Speaker 05: intent is to come back later
00:32:06 Speaker 05: this year with the draft study.
00:32:07 Speaker 05: We are getting very, very close
00:32:10 Speaker 05: to the end of it. The
00:32:11 Speaker 05: amount of number crunching that has
00:32:13 Speaker 05: gone on in the last little
00:32:15 Speaker 05: while, as things constantly change, has
00:32:17 Speaker 05: been impressive. So I think that
00:32:18 Speaker 05: what we wanted to ensure. is
00:32:19 Speaker 05: that we have crunched everything possible,
00:32:20 Speaker 05: and we've looked at all of
00:32:21 Speaker 05: the if this then that things
00:32:23 Speaker 05: that could happen as part of
00:32:24 Speaker 05: this, so that we can bring
00:32:26 Speaker 05: it back. But what we do
00:32:27 Speaker 05: know is that we're not going
00:32:28 Speaker 10: to ask this council for approval
00:32:34 Speaker 10: of the whole network at this
00:32:35 Speaker 10: moment, because by the time it
00:32:38 Speaker 10: comes back to you, we are
00:32:40 Speaker 10: right in transition mode. So it
00:32:42 Speaker 11: would be looking to new council
00:32:43 Speaker 11: to make a formal decision
00:32:45 Speaker 11: on whether or not they're ready
00:32:48 Speaker 11: to support a unified transit network.
00:32:50 Speaker 11: But we want to make sure
00:32:52 Speaker 11: that this council is aware. of
00:32:54 Speaker 11: all of the work that's been
00:32:55 Speaker 11: done because you have been with
00:32:58 Speaker 11: us all along the path, so
00:33:00 Speaker 11: that you can see what we're
00:33:02 Speaker 11: looking at, and then that would
00:33:03 Speaker 11: give you an indication of what
00:33:06 Speaker 11: would be included in that budget
00:33:09 Speaker 11: going forward. Okay, thank you. I'm
00:33:10 Speaker 11: going to go online to Councillor
00:33:12 Speaker 12: Borden. Thank you. Good morning, County
00:33:13 Speaker 12: Council. Good morning, Borden. Through you,
00:33:15 Speaker 12: we've talked about this in the
00:33:16 Speaker 12: past. We talked about our regional
00:33:19 Speaker 09: partners, Bruce, Stephanie, Gray, Wellington, Saguin.
00:33:20 Speaker 09: What about Simcoe? I know it's
00:33:24 Speaker 09: we that's been in the conversation
00:33:25 Speaker 09: in the past, and we know
00:33:27 Speaker 09: just from being at the far
00:33:28 Speaker 09: east end of the region the
00:33:30 Speaker 09: need for more regional transit, not
00:33:31 Speaker 09: just the resort, but we have
00:33:35 Speaker 09: other employers in the area and
00:33:37 Speaker 09: people moving back and forth. So
00:33:39 Speaker 09: can somebody just reiterate the points
00:33:40 Speaker 09: of the possibility of looking at
00:33:43 Speaker 09: Simcoe? I don't know if it's
00:33:46 Speaker 09: for the CAO or, but through
00:33:49 Speaker 09: the board and if staff can
00:33:52 Speaker 09: answer that, please. Yes, thank you.
00:33:55 Speaker 09: I work. Yes, thank you. We're
00:33:56 Speaker 09: going to go to the CAO
00:33:58 Speaker 09: for that. Through you, Warden. Thank
00:34:01 Speaker 09: you for that question, Councillor Bounioux.
00:34:03 Speaker 09: The so, what I'll start with
00:34:06 Speaker 09: is that we are fortunate that
00:34:09 Speaker 09: the same consultant that we're using
00:34:10 Speaker 09: for this study is also the
00:34:12 Speaker 09: consultant that Simcoe is using for
00:34:13 Speaker 09: part of their transit review as
00:34:14 Speaker 09: well. And so, the sharing of
00:34:16 Speaker 09: information has been a lot easier
00:34:20 Speaker 09: to be able to to provide
00:34:22 Speaker 09: some of those updates. And so,
00:34:24 Speaker 09: with that, we've had some. preliminary
00:34:25 Speaker 09: conversations with Simcoe County, as well
00:34:27 Speaker 09: as Collingwood, as well as other
00:34:30 Speaker 09: providers that provide transit connections that
00:34:32 Speaker 09: don't just end at the border,
00:34:36 Speaker 09: so to speak, to make sure
00:34:37 Speaker 09: that whatever transit network is being
00:34:39 Speaker 09: recommended, there's connections that are being
00:34:42 Speaker 09: provided to to those routes. So
00:34:44 Speaker 09: that's that is being implemented and
00:34:45 Speaker 09: being discussed actively as part of
00:34:46 Speaker 09: the study work, and to make
00:34:49 Speaker 09: sure that at the end of
00:34:50 Speaker 09: the day. hopefully, we'll be able
00:34:52 Speaker 09: to also look at things like
00:34:53 Speaker 09: unified fare structures, unified payment systems,
00:34:56 Speaker 09: etc., long term as well. So
00:34:57 Speaker 09: that's that's the goal: is to
00:34:59 Speaker 09: try to not just look at
00:35:00 Speaker 09: the end of those borders of
00:35:03 Speaker 09: those four counties, but how they
00:35:05 Speaker 09: connect overall. As Stephanie indicated as
00:35:08 Speaker 09: well, Western Ontario Wardens Caucus is
00:35:10 Speaker 09: very interested in in what this
00:35:13 Speaker 09: looks like as a model that
00:35:14 Speaker 01: could be scaled to all of
00:35:17 Speaker 01: southwestern Ontario. So. back to
00:35:20 Speaker 01: Savannah's earlier comments, making sure that
00:35:22 Speaker 01: we get this right, we're taking
00:35:23 Speaker 01: the time to get this this
00:35:25 Speaker 01: to do this study work is
00:35:27 Speaker 01: is very important because there's lots
00:35:29 Speaker 01: of lots of folks that are
00:35:31 Speaker 01: very interested in the results of
00:35:34 Speaker 01: this study. So that's that is
00:35:36 Speaker 01: something also that we're we're looking
00:35:38 Speaker 01: at. So it's it's we we
00:35:40 Speaker 01: recognize it's even bigger than the
00:35:42 Speaker 01: four county and the four partners
00:35:44 Speaker 11: four county partners. It has to
00:35:47 Speaker 11: connect and and be scalable and
00:35:49 Speaker 11: connect to other operations that are
00:35:51 Speaker 11: throughout the the our nation. The
00:35:54 Speaker 13: our neighbors as well. Thank you,
00:35:56 Speaker 13: and I would add to that
00:35:57 Speaker 13: too that the the provincial interest
00:36:00 Speaker 13: and our our local provincial representation
00:36:03 Speaker 13: definitely sees the value that what
00:36:06 Speaker 13: we do here, the work we
00:36:07 Speaker 13: do here, could be duplicatable not
00:36:09 Speaker 13: just across the Western Ontario Warden's
00:36:10 Speaker 13: Caucus, but across counties across Ontario.
00:36:12 Speaker 13: We're all looking for the same
00:36:14 Speaker 13: solutions, so we we are people
00:36:16 Speaker 13: are watching, and and I'm glad
00:36:18 Speaker 13: because there's great work going on.
00:36:19 Speaker 13: So thank you very much for
00:36:20 Speaker 13: that. Any other questions? We'll go
00:36:22 Speaker 13: to Councilor McQueen. Oh, sorry, follow
00:36:24 Speaker 13: up, Councilor Bourdon. No, thank you,
00:36:26 Speaker 13: Madam Warden. You actually you answered
00:36:28 Speaker 13: my my next follow up in
00:36:30 Speaker 13: in in your comments. So thank
00:36:32 Speaker 13: you. Okay, thank you. And then
00:36:33 Speaker 13: we'll go to Councilor McQueen. Thank
00:36:35 Speaker 13: you, Madam Warden. Just a follow
00:36:36 Speaker 13: up with, with Nielsen with regards
00:36:42 Speaker 06: to budget wise, any idea when
00:36:43 Speaker 06: that might be coming? I hold
00:36:45 Speaker 06: that for a minute. I think
00:36:47 Speaker 06: what you. were saying, Randy, about
00:36:49 Speaker 06: fees and how we can charge.
00:36:51 Speaker 06: I mean, the system has to
00:36:53 Speaker 06: be sustainable. And I know with
00:36:54 Speaker 06: the past, with the grants, we're
00:36:56 Speaker 06: limited to what we could charge.
00:36:59 Speaker 06: Are we able to move past
00:37:01 Speaker 06: that? So it costs money to
00:37:03 Speaker 06: have a car, insurance, gas, and
00:37:04 Speaker 06: stuff like that. So you know,
00:37:05 Speaker 06: five dollars a ride, it's not
00:37:06 Speaker 06: sustainable at five bucks a ride.
00:37:10 Speaker 06: So so point is, roughly when
00:37:13 Speaker 06: that budget numbers will be coming
00:37:15 Speaker 06: with the options, I'm sure. But
00:37:18 Speaker 14: also the model that is makes
00:37:21 Speaker 14: it sustainable. All of that is
00:37:24 Speaker 14: makes it sustainable in the sense
00:37:25 Speaker 14: of what we can charge for
00:37:28 Speaker 14: fees. Thank you, Your Worship. I
00:37:29 Speaker 14: think Councilor McQueen. So we have
00:37:31 Speaker 14: heard the feedback over the last
00:37:33 Speaker 14: few years of operating the previous
00:37:34 Speaker 14: system. So I can assure you
00:37:36 Speaker 14: that when we do present our
00:37:44 Speaker 05: final findings, we will present a
00:37:45 Speaker 05: different fee structure to assist in
00:37:46 Speaker 05: the sustainability of a regional system
00:37:48 Speaker 05: and also accounting for the large
00:37:51 Speaker 05: geography that people may be traveling.
00:37:54 Speaker 05: So as Savannah noted, when we
00:37:55 Speaker 05: bring that all back to you
00:37:57 Speaker 05: in the future, it will all
00:37:59 Speaker 05: be covered in those documents. Okay,
00:38:01 Speaker 05: we'll go to the deputy warden.
00:38:03 Speaker 05: Thank you, Madam Warden, and thank
00:38:05 Speaker 05: you, Stephanie, for the report. And
00:38:07 Speaker 05: Savannah, without necessarily pulling the curtain
00:38:08 Speaker 05: back too far, Savannah alluded to
00:38:09 Speaker 05: a lot of number crunching, a
00:38:12 Speaker 05: lot of idea crunching. I'm wondering
00:38:13 Speaker 05: if you could give us any
00:38:14 Speaker 05: kind of sense of where are
00:38:16 Speaker 05: the pain points, and you know.
00:38:17 Speaker 05: where are we kind of headed,
00:38:18 Speaker 05: and why is this taking so
00:38:21 Speaker 05: much longer than we anticipated? Please.
00:38:22 Speaker 05: Well, that's a tricky question, but
00:38:26 Speaker 05: I will take I'll take a
00:38:27 Speaker 05: stab at that. I think as
00:38:31 Speaker 05: soon as you go
00:38:34 Speaker 05: beyond one council and one county
00:38:36 Speaker 05: and work with four and a
00:38:39 Speaker 05: huge geography, like we're talking over
00:38:42 Speaker 05: twelve thousand square kilometers, we're fifty
00:38:44 Speaker 05: three percent larger than the GTA.
00:38:46 Speaker 05: GTHA. This is the biggest study
00:38:47 Speaker 05: of its kind in the province.
00:38:48 Speaker 05: So that complexity alone has really
00:38:50 Speaker 05: added to it because everybody has
00:38:53 Speaker 05: a little bit of a different
00:38:54 Speaker 05: need. So trying to understand where
00:38:56 Speaker 05: those base levels could be and
00:38:57 Speaker 05: where those enhancements could be, so
00:38:58 Speaker 05: that we're not all on the
00:39:00 Speaker 05: hook for the same things. We're
00:39:02 Speaker 05: on the hook for what matters
00:39:05 Speaker 05: to us, but we're also sharing
00:39:07 Speaker 05: those base components as well. So
00:39:08 Speaker 05: that has been complex. A lot
00:39:10 Speaker 05: of certainty. That's a conversation that
00:39:13 Speaker 05: we just had with provincial staff
00:39:14 Speaker 05: and. our minister delegates because understanding
00:39:16 Speaker 05: that provincial certainty really matters when
00:39:17 Speaker 05: it comes to gas tax. For
00:39:19 Speaker 05: example, we have frozen figures, but
00:39:20 Speaker 05: they're based on assumptions from ridership
00:39:22 Speaker 05: two years ago. So it's trying
00:39:24 Speaker 05: to figure out when is the
00:39:26 Speaker 05: proper timing to actually look to
00:39:28 Speaker 05: gas tax. As O TIF goes
00:39:30 Speaker 05: down, gas tax could come up,
00:39:31 Speaker 05: but originally it was slated right
00:39:32 Speaker 05: from the very beginning. So that
00:39:34 Speaker 05: is one of those policy certainty
00:39:35 Speaker 05: pieces as well. Trying to make
00:39:37 Speaker 05: sure that we utilize and leverage
00:39:38 Speaker 05: the dollars that are available to
00:39:40 Speaker 05: the best ability that we have,
00:39:42 Speaker 05: while looking to year six. So
00:39:43 Speaker 05: I will. So I don't know
00:39:45 Speaker 05: if that was me. I will
00:39:46 Speaker 05: say that year six backwards is
00:39:48 Speaker 05: how we have been doing all
00:39:49 Speaker 05: of the financial crunching because we
00:39:51 Speaker 05: need to know when OTIF is
00:39:52 Speaker 05: no longer available. What does that
00:39:54 Speaker 05: look like on the budget? That
00:39:55 Speaker 05: is where we have spent the
00:39:57 Speaker 05: majority of our focus, making sure
00:39:59 Speaker 05: that we can be comfortable bringing
00:40:01 Speaker 05: something forward to this. table and
00:40:02 Speaker 05: three other councils and a board,
00:40:03 Speaker 05: knowing that we are all in
00:40:04 Speaker 05: this together. So looking around the
00:40:05 Speaker 05: different MetroLink Act, Bill ninety eight,
00:40:10 Speaker 03: all of those pieces, even though
00:40:13 Speaker 03: they don't actually apply to us
00:40:14 Speaker 03: this very moment, MetroLink applies to
00:40:17 Speaker 03: two of the four partners. So
00:40:20 Speaker 03: there are little bits and pieces
00:40:23 Speaker 03: that we just need to be
00:40:25 Speaker 03: sure about before we come back
00:40:27 Speaker 03: with a recommendation. Because the last
00:40:30 Speaker 03: thing we would want is to
00:40:31 Speaker 03: to ask you for your approval
00:40:33 Speaker 03: and your endorsement of something, and
00:40:35 Speaker 03: then realize that we actually asked
00:40:37 Speaker 03: you for the wrong thing. So
00:40:39 Speaker 03: that's why it's taken a little
00:40:41 Speaker 03: bit long. That's why it's taken
00:40:43 Speaker 03: a little bit longer, but I
00:40:45 Speaker 03: think that right now project partners
00:40:46 Speaker 03: feel very comfortable with the information
00:40:48 Speaker 03: that we're gathering, the work that
00:40:49 Speaker 03: we're doing, and the extra time
00:40:53 Speaker 03: that we've taken. And we're hoping
00:40:54 Speaker 03: the council will be supportive of
00:40:56 Speaker 03: that as well. Thank you. Anything
00:40:57 Speaker 03: further? We'll go to Councilor Greg.
00:40:59 Speaker 03: Thank you. And just to follow
00:41:00 Speaker 03: up on Councilor McQueen's comments regarding
00:41:02 Speaker 03: the fare structure, I'm still when
00:41:03 Speaker 03: we're looking at reintroducing another route,
00:41:05 Speaker 03: why we are. so fixated and
00:41:12 Speaker 03: stuck on five dollars a ride?
00:41:15 Speaker 03: Over the years that we've had
00:41:17 Speaker 03: this service, the wages for the
00:41:19 Speaker 03: driver went up, the mechanics went
00:41:22 Speaker 03: up, the bus costs more to
00:41:23 Speaker 03: buy, the fuels has increased. None
00:41:24 Speaker 03: of these costs have went down.
00:41:27 Speaker 03: And for a young person, they're
00:41:29 Speaker 03: paying ten dollars a day, approximately,
00:41:31 Speaker 03: just to get insurance on their
00:41:32 Speaker 03: own vehicle. They haven't bought the
00:41:34 Speaker 03: car or the truck yet. They're
00:41:36 Speaker 03: just insuring what they're going to
00:41:39 Speaker 03: plan on driving. When I looked
00:41:41 Speaker 03: at the audited financial statements, we
00:41:43 Speaker 03: have like ten point, I don't
00:41:45 Speaker 03: know, ten and a half to
00:41:49 Speaker 03: eleven million dollars in fees and
00:41:51 Speaker 03: charges that we derive from our
00:41:54 Speaker 03: own revenues as a corporation, which
00:41:56 Speaker 03: is about the same as we
00:41:58 Speaker 03: have in Owen Sound. And I
00:42:00 Speaker 03: wonder if we shouldn't be more
00:42:02 Speaker 03: concerns—not the right word—but look for
00:42:04 Speaker 03: opportunities to increase that line item
00:42:07 Speaker 03: in our budget. And this is
00:42:10 Speaker 03: one of those where. to to
00:42:12 Speaker 03: I get it. You're going to
00:42:17 Speaker 03: bring the report back and you'll
00:42:18 Speaker 06: look at the fare structure. But
00:42:20 Speaker 06: here's another opportunity after five or
00:42:21 Speaker 06: six years, where in reintroducing a
00:42:23 Speaker 06: route, it could be six dollars
00:42:24 Speaker 06: a ride, and people would understand
00:42:25 Speaker 06: that. People will push back. Everybody
00:42:27 Speaker 06: wants everything for free, but when
00:42:28 Speaker 06: you explain it and say over
00:42:31 Speaker 06: this many years the price has
00:42:32 Speaker 06: been static, and as a corporation
00:42:33 Speaker 06: we should identify that opportunity for
00:42:35 Speaker 06: increased revenues. because that in itself
00:42:37 Speaker 06: makes it more sustainable long term.
00:42:38 Speaker 06: If people pay their fair share,
00:42:39 Speaker 06: and when you parallel it with
00:42:41 Speaker 06: what people, the cost of owning
00:42:42 Speaker 06: a vehicle, it's a really good
00:42:44 Speaker 06: bargain. So I still I struggle
00:42:45 Speaker 06: with why we pass up an
00:42:46 Speaker 06: opportunity even now for a an
00:42:48 Speaker 06: opportunity to derive some increased revenues
00:42:50 Speaker 06: and make it more sustainable. Through
00:42:51 Speaker 06: your worship, thank you, Council. Through
00:42:55 Speaker 06: your worship, thank you, Councillor Craig.
00:42:56 Speaker 06: So, just as a note, the
00:42:58 Speaker 06: reintroduction of Route Five there is
00:42:59 Speaker 06: a fare increase. So, previously it
00:43:07 Speaker 15: was three dollars and fifty cents
00:43:09 Speaker 15: one way, and we have increased
00:43:12 Speaker 15: it to five. So, there is
00:43:13 Speaker 15: an an increase on that new
00:43:15 Speaker 15: introduction, a reintroduction, sorry. I also
00:43:17 Speaker 15: think there is a piece of
00:43:19 Speaker 15: this puzzle is right now the
00:43:21 Speaker 15: system is not. You can't go
00:43:24 Speaker 15: all over yet. So, right now
00:43:26 Speaker 15: you're still kind of in sections.
00:43:28 Speaker 15: You can go Owensend to Wyarston,
00:43:31 Speaker 15: you can go Owensend to Guelph,
00:43:33 Speaker 15: and then you can do Dundalk
00:43:34 Speaker 15: to Orangeville. So, I think there's
00:43:36 Speaker 15: some legitimacy in leaving the fares
00:43:38 Speaker 15: the way they are at this
00:43:39 Speaker 15: exact. Affairs the way they are
00:43:43 Speaker 15: at this exact moment, I appreciate
00:43:46 Speaker 06: your comment. Like I hear where
00:43:47 Speaker 06: you're coming from, but I think
00:43:48 Speaker 06: because the system is not completely
00:43:49 Speaker 06: connected yet, there is rationale to
00:43:51 Speaker 06: leave it at its current price.
00:43:53 Speaker 06: But happy to reconsider if that's
00:43:55 Speaker 06: the wish. Okay. All right. Oh,
00:43:57 Speaker 06: we'll go to Councillor Mackie. Thank
00:43:58 Speaker 06: you, Warden. Thank you, Stephanie. I
00:44:01 Speaker 06: know there's a a lot of
00:44:02 Speaker 06: work being done, and I guess.
00:44:04 Speaker 06: my question is in regards to
00:44:06 Speaker 06: point to point as opposed to
00:44:07 Speaker 06: fixed route. What is being looked
00:44:08 Speaker 06: at from point to point based
00:44:09 Speaker 06: on our geographic vastness? Point to
00:44:10 Speaker 06: point, in my opinion, is going
00:44:12 Speaker 06: to be a necessity. I don't
00:44:14 Speaker 06: think there'll be any fixed route
00:44:17 Speaker 06: going to Walters Falls. So, how
00:44:19 Speaker 06: does that person get to Highway
00:44:21 Speaker 06: Six or Highway Ten? So, could
00:44:22 Speaker 06: you just elaborate on what work's
00:44:23 Speaker 06: being done on point to point,
00:44:24 Speaker 06: please? Matthew, your worship, thank you,
00:44:26 Speaker 06: Councillor Mackie. So, there's a few
00:44:29 Speaker 06: different options that will be presented
00:44:31 Speaker 06: to you in the future as
00:44:33 Speaker 06: to how the system can work.
00:44:40 Speaker 06: There will be potentially a fixed
00:44:41 Speaker 06: route system. Previously, our consultant in
00:44:42 Speaker 06: March spoke to the different options
00:44:44 Speaker 01: as well. So, a fixed route.
00:44:46 Speaker 01: There can be point-to-point, as you
00:44:48 Speaker 01: noted. There's the first mile, last
00:44:50 Speaker 01: mile connection, so helping people get
00:44:51 Speaker 01: to the fixed route. So, there's
00:44:53 Speaker 01: a various options that you can
00:44:55 Speaker 01: kind of turn on and turn
00:44:56 Speaker 01: off, and they all come with
00:44:58 Speaker 01: different costs associated to them, and
00:45:01 Speaker 16: they all come with different pros
00:54:38 Speaker 01: and cons. So currently, our peers
00:54:40 Speaker 01: in Wellington County have point-to-point across
00:54:41 Speaker 17: their entire geography, and as noted,
00:55:11 Speaker 01: there's pros and cons to both.
00:55:13 Speaker 01: So I think when we come
00:55:14 Speaker 01: back with our final study results,
00:55:17 Speaker 01: we can show you all of
00:55:19 Speaker 01: the different options and how we
00:55:21 Speaker 01: plan on rolling out a successful
00:55:23 Speaker 01: system. So I assure you, those
00:55:25 Speaker 01: those things will come back to
00:55:28 Speaker 01: you soon with some more detail.
00:55:29 Speaker 01: Okay. All right. Well, in that
00:55:31 Speaker 01: case, then I don't see any
00:55:33 Speaker 01: further hands. Thank you very much
00:55:36 Speaker 01: for all that extra information. I'll
00:55:38 Speaker 01: call the vote then. All those
00:55:41 Speaker 01: in favor, and that motion is
00:55:42 Speaker 01: carried. Thank you. We'll call a
00:55:45 Speaker 01: break now. We're at just past
00:55:48 Speaker 01: 10 after, so if we can
00:55:50 Speaker 01: be back by 11:20, that will
00:55:51 Speaker 01: allow us to carry on with
00:55:53 Speaker 01: items 7A and B, and then
00:55:55 Speaker 01: return to 6A and E. Thank
00:55:57 Speaker 01: you. Okay, we are at eleven.
00:55:59 Speaker 01: twenty. So I'll invite everybody to
00:56:33 Speaker 01: come back to the council chamber.
00:56:35 Speaker 01: Excellent. Thank you very much. So
00:56:36 Speaker 01: we are on to item seven
7.b PDR-CW-27-26 Approval of the Municipality of West Grey’s New Official Plan
The committee approved Report PDR-CW-27-26, endorsing the Municipality of West Grey’s new official plan for the primary settlement areas of Durham and Newstadt. Senior Planner Buckton highlighted that while minor typos were corrected, a proposed land addition was better handled via site-specific processes rather than inclusion in this document. The final adopted version includes specific boundary adjustments to Concession One for wellhead protection mapping in Durham, whereas no changes occurred for the constraint schedule or land use boundaries in Newstadt.
00:56:39 Speaker 01: B at this point in time.
00:56:40 Speaker 01: It's recommended that report PDR CW
00:56:43 Speaker 01: twenty seven twenty six regarding the
00:56:46 Speaker 01: approval of the municipality of Westray's
00:56:48 Speaker 01: new official plan for the primary
00:56:49 Speaker 18: settlement areas of Durham and New
00:56:52 Speaker 18: Stat be received, and that the
00:56:54 Speaker 18: Committee of the Whole hereby approves
00:56:57 Speaker 18: the official, the new official plan
00:56:58 Speaker 18: for the primary settlement areas of
00:57:01 Speaker 18: Durham and New Stat. Of Durham
00:57:04 Speaker 18: and Newstadt, in the municipality of
00:57:06 Speaker 18: West Grey, as adopted by Bylaw
00:57:07 Speaker 18: Twenty Five Twenty Twenty Five One
00:57:09 Speaker 18: Hundred Five, subject to those modifications
00:57:11 Speaker 18: attached to the report PDRCDOU Twenty
00:57:13 Speaker 18: Seven Twenty Six as Appendix One.
00:57:15 Speaker 18: May I ask for a mover
00:57:17 Speaker 18: and a seconder? We have a
00:57:20 Speaker 18: move by Councillor Hutchinson, and seconded
00:57:22 Speaker 18: by Councillor Nielsen. It's now on
00:57:23 Speaker 18: the floor for discussion. So I
00:57:26 Speaker 18: would like to welcome Senior Planner
00:57:28 Speaker 18: Buckton up. Wonderful. thank you very
00:57:30 Speaker 18: much, Madam Warden. Very glad to
00:57:33 Speaker 18: be here with you today. We'll
00:57:35 Speaker 18: be brief, but just have some
00:57:38 Speaker 18: highlights to offer with respect to
00:57:39 Speaker 18: the staff report as has been
00:57:42 Speaker 18: presented. So, as the Warden had
00:57:44 Speaker 18: noted, the recommendation of the report
00:57:46 Speaker 18: is approval of the Westbury Official
00:57:49 Speaker 18: Plan for the primary settlement areas
00:57:50 Speaker 18: of Jeram and Newstadt, subject to
00:57:51 Speaker 18: the modifications that staff outlined within
00:57:54 Speaker 18: Appendix One of the report. There
00:57:55 Speaker 18: are a few things. that we
00:57:58 Speaker 18: must address when we're assessing an
00:58:00 Speaker 18: official plan for approval. So I
00:58:02 Speaker 18: thought I would give just a
00:58:03 Speaker 18: very high level background, highlight those
00:58:06 Speaker 18: things have been met, and then
00:58:08 Speaker 18: we can move along. This official
00:58:10 Speaker 18: plan, I was thinking as I
00:58:12 Speaker 18: was sitting, it's been a process.
00:58:14 Speaker 18: I think, think maybe I started
00:58:16 Speaker 18: with Laura Lee a number of
00:58:19 Speaker 18: years back, and then David Smith
00:58:20 Speaker 18: had to candle through, and now
00:58:24 Speaker 18: Matt Rappke as the most recent
00:58:26 Speaker 18: addition to the planning department. In
00:58:27 Speaker 18: addition to the planning department, has
00:58:28 Speaker 18: brought this through to completion. This
00:58:31 Speaker 18: was approved locally or adopted locally
00:58:32 Speaker 18: in December, and we have been
00:58:34 Speaker 18: working with staff since that time,
00:58:36 Speaker 18: just to to refine. We picked
00:58:39 Speaker 18: out a few wee little typos
00:58:40 Speaker 18: that needed some correction. There was
00:58:41 Speaker 18: one more major situation where an
00:58:44 Speaker 18: area of land had been proposed
00:58:45 Speaker 18: to be added to the settlement
00:58:47 Speaker 18: area, and staff are actually suggesting
00:58:48 Speaker 18: perhaps that's better done through a
00:58:50 Speaker 18: site specific process. But beyond that.
00:58:52 Speaker 18: I think the plan the plan
00:58:56 Speaker 18: is wonderful. They've done a great
00:58:58 Speaker 18: job in pulling that together, and
00:59:00 Speaker 18: it's very concise. Sometimes official plans
00:59:02 Speaker 18: can be a little verbose. I
00:59:04 Speaker 18: like the planners who are engaged
00:59:06 Speaker 18: in in drafting those as well.
00:59:09 Speaker 18: So this one was was very
00:59:11 Speaker 18: concise. It does what it needs
00:59:13 Speaker 18: to do, but does not you
00:59:16 Speaker 18: know go into duplicating county policy
00:59:18 Speaker 18: and that type of thing. So
00:59:18 Speaker 18: legislation and policy that's one of
00:59:21 Speaker 18: the areas that we're required to.
00:59:22 Speaker 18: analyze as we're looking at a
00:59:24 Speaker 18: new official plan, so we are
00:59:26 Speaker 18: required to be consistent with the
00:59:28 Speaker 18: provincial planning statement and conform to
00:59:29 Speaker 18: the county plan, as well as
00:59:32 Speaker 18: have regard for matters of provincial
00:59:33 Speaker 18: interest. So you'll note within the
00:59:37 Speaker 18: staff report, I have walked through
00:59:40 Speaker 18: those areas of provincial interest and
00:59:42 Speaker 18: spoken briefly at a high level
00:59:43 Speaker 18: to how the plan has addressed
00:59:45 Speaker 18: them. Additional detail is found within
00:59:47 Speaker 18: the staff report at the local
00:59:49 Speaker 18: level, which is appended to the
00:59:52 Speaker 18: report as well. And staff do
00:59:54 Speaker 18: find that. we have regard for
00:59:55 Speaker 18: matters in the Planning Act, and
00:59:59 Speaker 18: we would find that this is
01:00:01 Speaker 18: consistent with the provincial planning statement
01:00:05 Speaker 18: as well, subject to those modifications
01:00:08 Speaker 18: in Appendix One. And then, like
01:00:10 Speaker 18: I said, conformity with the county
01:00:11 Speaker 18: official plan. So this is a
01:00:13 Speaker 18: requirement of the Act. I did
01:00:15 Speaker 18: highlight around that duplication piece. So
01:00:19 Speaker 18: I think one of the things
01:00:21 Speaker 18: I really liked about this plan
01:00:23 Speaker 18: is they've done a really good
01:00:26 Speaker 18: balancing between the detail that's included.
01:00:28 Speaker 18: locally, but then in referencing also
01:00:30 Speaker 18: the county policy that might go
01:00:33 Speaker 18: a kind of more expansive around
01:00:34 Speaker 18: the same issues, rather than embedding
01:00:37 Speaker 18: that directly into that local plan,
01:00:39 Speaker 18: which I thought was a nice
01:00:40 Speaker 18: nice approach. Great, and so yes,
01:00:43 Speaker 18: subject to this modifications, staff find
01:00:44 Speaker 18: that this would conform to the
01:00:46 Speaker 18: county official plan as well. And
01:00:49 Speaker 18: so then, just for reference, I've
01:00:50 Speaker 18: included the schedules. So three of
01:00:52 Speaker 18: the schedules required some updates in
01:00:54 Speaker 18: relation to modifications. Two were. To
01:00:57 Speaker 18: where, where as they were, but
01:00:57 Speaker 18: we've got the land use schedule
01:00:59 Speaker 18: for Durham. We've adjusted that boundary
01:01:05 Speaker 18: based on the the modifications around
01:01:06 Speaker 18: those added lands. Newstat did not
01:01:08 Speaker 18: see any changes to the land
01:01:10 Speaker 18: use schedule. The appendix A for
01:01:11 Speaker 18: Durham did see some changes, and
01:01:12 Speaker 18: again, we were just snapping and
01:01:14 Speaker 01: reflecting the features out to to
01:01:16 Speaker 01: that rounded out boundary. Newstat again,
01:01:19 Speaker 01: no changes to the constraint schedule
01:01:21 Speaker 01: versus what was. adopted, and then
01:01:24 Speaker 01: just with respect to the wellhead
01:01:27 Speaker 01: protection area mapping for Durham, we
01:01:30 Speaker 01: had done a very minor bringing
01:01:31 Speaker 01: the boundary out to concession one,
01:01:32 Speaker 01: which that just inside of the
01:01:35 Speaker 01: boundary of that road previously. So
01:01:36 Speaker 01: we've brought that mapping just out
01:01:39 Speaker 01: to that concession one boundary for
01:01:45 Speaker 01: the settlement as well. So I'm
01:01:48 Speaker 01: happy to address any questions that
01:01:50 Speaker 04: arise. But I think generally I
01:01:51 Speaker 04: would leave it there. I think
01:01:55 Speaker 04: we are in a good position.
01:01:57 Speaker 04: for adoption, and that would be
01:01:59 Speaker 04: my recommendation to council. Thank
01:02:02 Speaker 04: you very much, Madam Worn. Okay,
01:02:03 Speaker 04: thank you. So I'll put it
01:02:05 Speaker 04: out to many of the whole
01:02:08 Speaker 04: members if they have questions or
01:02:09 Speaker 04: comments. Okay. Well, I guess the
01:02:11 Speaker 04: maps say it all. I don't
01:02:14 Speaker 04: see any questions. The hands being
01:02:18 Speaker 04: raised. Excellent. Well, thank you. It
01:02:19 Speaker 04: has been moved and seconded, so
01:02:21 Speaker 04: I'll call the vote. Then, all
01:02:22 Speaker 04: those in favor, and that motion
01:02:24 Speaker 04: is carried. Thank you very much,
01:02:25 Speaker 04: Planner Buckton. and next we will
01:02:26 Speaker 04: move to item 7C. It's recommended
01:02:29 Speaker 04: that report FRCW 1626 regarding the
7.c FR-CW-16-26 Corporate Financial Update - April 30, 2026
Manager Reid presented a corporate financial update as of April 30th, noting significant variances driven by seasonality and timing differences in insurance payments and capital projects. An expected deficit exists within the IT budget due to over-budget costs for switches and wireless access points at existing buildings, while court security incurred an actual cost of $497,000 against a $400,000 budget following invoice receipt from Own Sound today. Emergency roof repairs completed in 2026 created a deficit because the original 2025 budget was not rolled forward for these expenses. Taxation projections remain difficult due to quarterly remittals and lower-tier collection delays, prompting a survey of those groups for better line-of-sight on supplemental taxes and write-offs. The planning department anticipates revenue shortfalls from application fees based on current volume trends, whereas housing is trending toward a surplus with tenant rents exceeding budgeted amounts despite potential fluctuations from moveouts. Transportation services face an anticipated deficit in the first half of winter that will be addressed during 2027 budget sizing, though severity depends on October through December conditions; this department also faces a timing deficit regarding machinery and equipment capital funded by reserves not yet authorized for transfer without council approval. Major construction budgets expect to consume asphalt index contingencies due to current pricing increases, contrasting with last year's surplus driven by unused contingency funds.
01:02:30 Speaker 04: corporate financial update as of April
01:02:32 Speaker 04: 30th, 2026, be received for information.
01:02:34 Speaker 04: May I ask for a mover
01:02:35 Speaker 04: and a seconder? Move by Councillor
01:02:36 Speaker 04: Deckard, seconded by Councillor Eccles. It's
01:02:38 Speaker 04: now on the floor for discussion,
01:02:39 Speaker 04: and a returning welcome to Manager
01:02:43 Speaker 04: Reid. Thank you very much. Through
01:02:46 Speaker 04: the warden, this report provides a
01:02:47 Speaker 04: financial update to council as of
01:02:49 Speaker 04: our financials as of April 30th.
01:02:51 Speaker 04: A lot can change in those
01:02:53 Speaker 04: remaining eight months in the year.
01:02:55 Speaker 04: I made a joke earlier about
01:02:56 Speaker 04: provincial funding announcements. Long-term care won't
01:02:57 Speaker 04: have their funding announcements yet, so
01:02:58 Speaker 04: so there's a lot of variances
01:03:02 Speaker 04: that can change. And then a
01:03:06 Speaker 04: lot of the variances you'll see
01:03:07 Speaker 04: in the financial statements can be
01:03:09 Speaker 04: explained by seasonality. You know. we
01:03:12 Speaker 04: pay our insurance once in the
01:03:14 Speaker 04: year, so it might look like
01:03:16 Speaker 04: it's in a surplus right now,
01:03:17 Speaker 04: but that's just because we haven't
01:03:21 Speaker 04: paid the bill. That's the case
01:03:23 Speaker 04: in housing; we have paid our
01:03:25 Speaker 04: corporate insurance policy. But so there's
01:03:26 Speaker 04: a lot of different timing differences
01:03:28 Speaker 04: that get explained in this report,
01:03:29 Speaker 04: and a lot of them repeat
01:03:31 Speaker 04: themselves throughout departments. So I'm not
01:03:32 Speaker 04: going to go through it all,
01:03:34 Speaker 04: but if there are questions, I'm
01:03:37 Speaker 04: happy to answer them. I'm just
01:03:39 Speaker 04: going to touch on the high-level
01:03:41 Speaker 04: variances that we've noted. and I
01:03:43 Speaker 04: will also reference that there is
01:03:44 Speaker 04: a sister report on the consent
01:03:46 Speaker 04: agenda that provides a detailed update
01:03:48 Speaker 04: for all of the capital projects
01:03:50 Speaker 04: as well. So these going together
01:03:52 Speaker 04: is kind of nice. But again,
01:03:55 Speaker 04: acknowledging that we only have four
01:03:57 Speaker 04: months of data in there, so
01:04:00 Speaker 04: things are subject to change, and
01:04:01 Speaker 04: that these financials that you're seeing
01:04:03 Speaker 04: are what I would call at
01:04:06 Speaker 04: a pretty high level, so that
01:04:08 Speaker 04: the report does not become a
01:04:10 Speaker 04: thousand pages. They get reviewed with
01:04:12 Speaker 04: the financial analyst team and managers
01:04:13 Speaker 04: and directors on a monthly basis
01:04:15 Speaker 04: at a much more granular level.
01:04:18 Speaker 04: I think within housing, I believe
01:04:20 Speaker 04: there's two FRX pages that we
01:04:22 Speaker 04: provided. I think their actual FRX
01:04:24 Speaker 04: package that they go through is
01:04:26 Speaker 04: about 87 pages long. So there
01:04:29 Speaker 04: is a lot more detail than
01:04:33 Speaker 04: what you're seeing here compressed. But
01:04:34 Speaker 04: because we're looking at it corporately,
01:04:37 Speaker 04: we have to kind of shrink
01:04:41 Speaker 04: it a little bit. So starting
01:04:43 Speaker 04: within corporate services, I'll just highlight.
01:04:45 Speaker 04: and this was in a previous
01:04:46 Speaker 04: staff report, that there is an
01:04:48 Speaker 04: expected deficit within the IT capital
01:04:50 Speaker 04: budget as a result of our
01:04:51 Speaker 04: switches and wireless access points being
01:04:53 Speaker 04: over budget. A portion of these
01:04:55 Speaker 04: costs are due to new buildings
01:04:56 Speaker 04: that we're constructing, so those costs
01:04:58 Speaker 04: get built into the capital project.
01:05:06 Speaker 04: But the replacement of switches and
01:05:07 Speaker 04: wireless access points within our existing
01:05:09 Speaker 04: buildings get funded through Jody's IT
01:05:13 Speaker 04: budget, and they're expected to be
01:05:14 Speaker 04: in a deficit. Core. Court security.
01:05:16 Speaker 04: When you're looking at the financials,
01:05:18 Speaker 04: nothing has been paid as of
01:05:21 Speaker 04: April 30th, but we have received
01:05:22 Speaker 04: the invoice from Own Sound as
01:05:24 Speaker 04: today. We received it the court
01:05:25 Speaker 04: date as of today, and we
01:05:28 Speaker 04: had a budget of 400,000. Their
01:05:30 Speaker 04: actual costs are coming in at
01:05:32 Speaker 04: about 497,000, so that will create
01:05:32 Speaker 04: a a deficit in the 2026
01:05:35 Speaker 04: budget, and will be something we
01:05:37 Speaker 04: need to add into the 2027
01:05:39 Speaker 04: budget to reflect this increase in
01:05:41 Speaker 04: costs within the property budget, at
01:05:42 Speaker 04: the year-end transfer report, I spoke
01:05:45 Speaker 04: of how the capital deficit was
01:05:45 Speaker 04: not as large as we expected,
01:05:48 Speaker 04: as the roof repairs did not
01:05:49 Speaker 04: end up. The emergency roof repairs
01:05:51 Speaker 04: did not end up getting done
01:05:54 Speaker 04: in the year. However, now they
01:05:56 Speaker 04: have been done in 2026, and
01:05:58 Speaker 04: the budget was not rolled forward.
01:06:00 Speaker 04: Therefore, it will create a deficit
01:06:02 Speaker 04: in 2020, 2026. Taxation and grants.
01:06:03 Speaker 04: I just want to flag that
01:06:03 Speaker 04: one. It's a tricky one, as
01:06:05 Speaker 04: the taxation is collected by the
01:06:07 Speaker 04: lower tiers and remitted to the
01:06:08 Speaker 04: the county on a quarterly basis.
01:06:10 Speaker 04: We usually don't get the year
01:06:16 Speaker 04: end reconciliations until a few months
01:06:18 Speaker 04: after year end, so it's very
01:06:22 Speaker 04: difficult for us to project whether
01:06:24 Speaker 04: we're going to be in a
01:06:25 Speaker 04: surplus or deficit within supplemental taxes
01:06:28 Speaker 04: and write offs in any given
01:06:29 Speaker 04: year. But what we are going
01:06:31 Speaker 04: to try to do this year
01:06:34 Speaker 04: is put out a a certain
01:06:35 Speaker 04: Put out a survey to the
01:06:36 Speaker 04: lower tier groups and just see
01:06:39 Speaker 04: if they have an idea right
01:06:41 Speaker 04: now. Again, acknowledging that that subs
01:06:44 Speaker 04: and write-offs can change drastically from
01:06:46 Speaker 04: from month to month. But just
01:06:49 Speaker 04: to give us a bit more
01:06:51 Speaker 04: line of sight, which will be
01:06:55 Speaker 04: included in the next financial update,
01:06:57 Speaker 04: which will include a year-end projection
01:07:00 Speaker 04: as well. Within the planning department,
01:07:02 Speaker 04: I want to highlight that user
01:07:04 Speaker 04: fees for application fees are trending
01:07:06 Speaker 04: to be under budget. There is
01:07:08 Speaker 04: quite a bit of fluctuation in
01:07:10 Speaker 04: these based on when things. are
01:07:11 Speaker 04: coming in, but at this point
01:07:13 Speaker 04: time, we do expect to be
01:07:15 Speaker 04: in a shortfall or deficit within
01:07:25 Speaker 19: the revenue within the planning department,
01:07:27 Speaker 04: based on the volume of applications
01:07:29 Speaker 04: coming in right now. Economic development
01:07:31 Speaker 04: and tourism. There's this was communicated
01:07:33 Speaker 04: to council through EDTC CWO five
01:07:36 Speaker 04: twenty six, but there's a few
01:07:38 Speaker 04: projects that were not carried forward
01:07:39 Speaker 04: into the twenty twenty six budget
01:07:41 Speaker 04: that did not get completed in
01:07:43 Speaker 04: twenty twenty five. So staff have
01:07:45 Speaker 04: brought. back a report to to
01:07:46 Speaker 04: get those done in twenty twenty
01:07:48 Speaker 04: or get permission to get those
01:07:50 Speaker 04: done in twenty twenty six, as
01:07:54 Speaker 04: well as an emergency repair at
01:07:55 Speaker 04: the Sydenham campus for a. Don't
01:07:56 Speaker 04: want to say this wrong for
01:07:59 Speaker 04: a hot water tank and boiler
01:08:01 Speaker 04: boiler failure. And then the other
01:08:04 Speaker 04: projects are at Great Roots and
01:08:06 Speaker 04: are highlighted in that section. Currently,
01:08:08 Speaker 04: housing is trending towards a surplus
01:08:09 Speaker 04: in their user fees tenant. rents
01:08:10 Speaker 04: are trending higher than budget right
01:08:12 Speaker 04: now. This can change a little
01:08:13 Speaker 04: bit based on tenant circumstances and
01:08:15 Speaker 04: and moveouts and the timeline between
01:08:17 Speaker 04: moveouts. But based on the first
01:08:18 Speaker 04: four months of data, we have
01:08:19 Speaker 04: we are looking at slightly higher
01:08:21 Speaker 04: than budgeted tenant rents from our
01:08:22 Speaker 04: from our tenants. The transportation services
01:08:24 Speaker 04: department currently we are looking based.
01:08:26 Speaker 04: on the first half of winter,
01:08:27 Speaker 04: we are looking at a deficit
01:08:29 Speaker 04: within that budget again. So we're
01:08:30 Speaker 04: working to right size that within
01:08:32 Speaker 04: the 2027 budget. We do not
01:08:34 Speaker 04: expect it though to be as
01:08:38 Speaker 04: large as the 2025 deficit was.
01:08:39 Speaker 04: It wasn't as severe of a
01:08:41 Speaker 04: winter, but but we do anticipate
01:08:45 Speaker 04: a deficit at this point in
01:08:48 Speaker 04: time. But again, the the severity
01:08:50 Speaker 04: of that will depend on October,
01:08:51 Speaker 04: November, December. I want to highlight
01:08:54 Speaker 04: that there will be a deficit
01:08:56 Speaker 04: within their machinery and equipment capital.
01:08:57 Speaker 04: budget as a greater was received
01:09:00 Speaker 04: in twenty twenty six that was
01:09:02 Speaker 04: included in the twenty twenty five
01:09:04 Speaker 04: budget and was not rebudgeted for.
01:09:07 Speaker 04: This is really a timing difference
01:09:10 Speaker 04: or a timing deficit as that
01:09:12 Speaker 04: project would have been funded by
01:09:14 Speaker 04: reserve in twenty twenty five. So
01:09:16 Speaker 04: we wouldn't have taken that money
01:09:16 Speaker 04: out of reserve in twenty twenty
01:09:18 Speaker 04: five, but we don't have the
01:09:20 Speaker 04: authority to take it out of
01:09:23 Speaker 01: reserve in twenty twenty six without
01:09:24 Speaker 01: the budget approval or without a
01:09:25 Speaker 01: without council approval. So it's really
01:09:28 Speaker 01: a timing difference. The money's there.
01:09:30 Speaker 01: It's just the twenty twenty six
01:09:31 Speaker 01: budget. The 2026 budget does not
01:09:33 Speaker 01: include that transfer reserve, so it'll
01:09:34 Speaker 01: create a deficit to be funded
01:09:36 Speaker 01: by that reserve at 20 at
01:09:43 Speaker 01: the end of 2026. But it
01:09:45 Speaker 20: doesn't impact the overall financial position
01:09:48 Speaker 20: of Bridge County. And then, lastly,
01:09:49 Speaker 20: I just want to highlight for
01:09:52 Speaker 20: the major construction budget that staff
01:09:55 Speaker 20: are currently monitoring the asphalt indexes
01:09:58 Speaker 20: as we go through and and
01:10:00 Speaker 20: get our invoicing. I at the
01:10:03 Speaker 20: year-end transfer report last year, I
01:10:06 Speaker 20: reported a large surplus in the
01:10:08 Speaker 20: major construction budget, and that was
01:10:11 Speaker 20: primarily driven by us not using
01:10:13 Speaker 20: any of our contingencies, which also
01:10:14 Speaker 20: funds changes in asphalt index pricing.
01:10:15 Speaker 20: Based on the increases we're seeing
01:10:18 Speaker 20: right now, we do expect for
01:10:20 Speaker 20: those contingencies to be consumed more
01:10:24 Speaker 20: for for those asphalt projects that
01:10:26 Speaker 20: are subject to indexing. And with
01:10:29 Speaker 20: that, I'm happy to answer any
01:10:31 Speaker 20: more questions that came up from
01:10:39 Speaker 20: the report. But those are the
01:10:40 Speaker 04: high level known surpluses or deficits
01:10:42 Speaker 04: that that we know at this
01:10:44 Speaker 04: point in time. Okay. Thank you
01:10:46 Speaker 04: very much for that introduction. And
01:10:48 Speaker 04: as you noted, we will be
01:10:50 Speaker 04: shortly returning to item 6e. So,
01:10:53 Speaker 04: if there is a question that
01:10:56 Speaker 04: leans more on that side, hold
01:10:58 Speaker 04: that question for when we get
01:10:59 Speaker 04: to that report. But in the
01:11:00 Speaker 04: meantime, questions for or comments for
01:11:02 Speaker 04: Manager Reid, Councillor Eccles. Thank you,
01:11:03 Speaker 04: Madam Warden. Through you to Garrett.
01:11:05 Speaker 04: Just there was a couple in
01:11:07 Speaker 04: there. The one in transportation on
01:11:10 Speaker 04: the grade. In transportation on the
01:11:12 Speaker 04: grader, the roof. How is it
01:11:13 Speaker 04: that we didn't transfer that to
01:11:15 Speaker 04: reserve or move that back and
01:11:17 Speaker 04: forth in reserves? Just there was
01:11:18 Speaker 04: one, I believe, in housing. Yep,
01:11:19 Speaker 04: we did the transfer. Didn't get
01:11:20 Speaker 04: finished in 25, so we moved
01:11:24 Speaker 04: it. But there's three or four
01:11:29 Speaker 04: in here. Yeah, well, we didn't
01:11:30 Speaker 04: move it, and now we're going
01:11:33 Speaker 04: to end up with a deficit,
01:11:33 Speaker 04: and it just had the auditor.
01:11:35 Speaker 04: Just have the auditors here, and
01:11:36 Speaker 04: what, how can I guess? What
01:11:38 Speaker 04: policies do we put in place
01:11:39 Speaker 04: that would make sure that that
01:11:41 Speaker 04: does happen? From what clarity in
01:11:43 Speaker 04: the budget moving forward on those
01:11:45 Speaker 04: projects? Yep, that's through the board,
01:11:46 Speaker 04: and that's a great question. We've
01:11:49 Speaker 04: talked about that as staff about
01:11:51 Speaker 04: what mechanisms we have to avoid
01:11:53 Speaker 04: those timing deficits because. you know,
01:11:54 Speaker 04: you said, how did we miss
01:11:56 Speaker 04: not transferring that money? It's really
01:11:57 Speaker 04: just when we're developing our twenty
01:11:59 Speaker 04: twenty, our next year's capital budget.
01:12:00 Speaker 04: We're looking at what was in
01:12:02 Speaker 04: the previous capital plan, and then
01:12:03 Speaker 04: is there anything in our current
01:12:05 Speaker 04: capital plan that won't get done?
01:12:09 Speaker 04: So these would be items that
01:12:12 Speaker 04: you know, based on when the
01:12:14 Speaker 04: budgets were developed in August September,
01:12:16 Speaker 04: we we thought we're going to
01:12:18 Speaker 04: get done. I know for the
01:12:19 Speaker 04: roof, it was emergency repair; the
01:12:20 Speaker 04: the contractor was ready, and then.
01:12:24 Speaker 04: winter came sooner than we than
01:12:27 Speaker 04: we thought, so so they couldn't
01:12:28 Speaker 04: get up on the roof to
01:12:30 Speaker 04: make the repair. The grader, same
01:12:31 Speaker 04: thing. The the successful tender company
01:12:37 Speaker 04: was telling us, "Yeah, you're going
01:12:41 Speaker 04: to have that grader November, December,
01:12:42 Speaker 04: and then December thirty first came,
01:12:44 Speaker 04: and we didn't have a grader."
01:12:45 Speaker 01: So we work on the best
01:12:48 Speaker 01: information we have available at the
01:12:49 Speaker 01: time, but those are all those.
01:12:51 Speaker 01: There's always going to be those
01:12:52 Speaker 01: changes. So whether we look at
01:12:53 Speaker 01: you know having a separate item
01:12:56 Speaker 01: included, kind of at the end
01:12:58 Speaker 01: of the budget process, that says
01:13:00 Speaker 01: we presented the budget, but now
01:13:02 Speaker 01: we're we're also asking to add
01:13:04 Speaker 01: in these last minute items, which
01:13:05 Speaker 01: will be funded from reserve from
01:13:08 Speaker 01: the previous year's budget, and we
01:13:10 Speaker 01: do that. Or what we've talked
01:13:12 Speaker 01: about too is in when we
01:13:14 Speaker 01: do the year end surplus deficit
01:13:15 Speaker 01: report, and that comes back in
01:13:18 Speaker 01: March and April. We also say
01:13:21 Speaker 01: and staff are looking for authority
01:13:22 Speaker 01: to fund these projects within the
01:13:24 Speaker 01: 2026 budget using 2025 reserve funds.
01:13:25 Speaker 01: Again, it's it's. really a timing
01:13:27 Speaker 01: difference because staff do not have
01:13:28 Speaker 01: the authority to touch reserves. So
01:13:29 Speaker 01: we get that authority through the
01:13:33 Speaker 01: budget protests and we get that
01:13:35 Speaker 13: authority through council reports. So probably
01:13:37 Speaker 13: there there is something that we
01:13:40 Speaker 13: can look at to avoid these
01:13:41 Speaker 13: timing deficits. And we are talking
01:13:44 Speaker 13: about how we're going to address
01:13:45 Speaker 13: that in twenty twenty seven. Okay,
01:13:48 Speaker 13: thank you very much. Others. Okay,
01:13:49 Speaker 13: I'm not seeing any further. questions,
01:13:51 Speaker 13: then. So it's been moved and
01:13:55 Speaker 13: seconded. I'll call the question. All
01:13:56 Speaker 13: those in favor? That motion is
01:13:58 Speaker 13: carried. Thank you very much, Manager
01:13:59 Speaker 13: Reed. And you'll have a moment's
01:14:01 Speaker 13: rest while we go to 6A,
01:14:03 Speaker 13: but then we'll bring you back
01:14:06 Speaker 13: for 6E. Okay. So with that,
01:14:08 Speaker 13: we will return to item 6A.
6.a Municipality of Grey Highlands - Traffic Calming Measures Grey Road 13
Councillor Paul McQueen moved a motion to receive correspondence from the Municipality of Grey Highlands regarding traffic calming measures on Gray Road 13 for the village of Kimberly, supported by Councillors Nielsen and Gregg. The proposal advocates for physical barriers as temporary summer installations similar to those used in Morning's Mills and Fergus, noting that permanent infrastructure is not currently planned but seasonal options are effective at slowing traffic. An amendment was successfully moved by Barbara Dobreen to direct staff to provide a report on available implementation options and costing rather than mandating immediate installation without review. Councillor McLean clarified the intent for the motion should seek information first before assuming implementation, which aligns with standard county practice of evaluating capital projects for safety improvements. Transportation Service Staff confirmed they are collecting speed data regularly and will share it with Gray Highlands staff within a few weeks to inform future decisions on physical traffic calming initiatives.
01:14:13 Speaker 13: It's recommended that the correspondence from
01:14:14 Speaker 13: the Municipality of Grey Highlands regarding
01:14:17 Speaker 13: traffic calming measures on Grey Road
01:14:19 Speaker 13: 13 be received for information. May
01:14:20 Speaker 13: I have a mover and a
01:14:22 Speaker 13: seconder? Got a move by Councillor
01:14:23 Speaker 13: Nielsen. seconded seconded by Councillor Gregg.
01:14:26 Speaker 13: It's now on the floor for
01:14:29 Speaker 13: discussion. Councillor McQueen, you had requested
01:14:32 Speaker 13: this be pulled. Well, thank you,
01:14:33 Speaker 13: Mr. Warden, County Council. So this
01:14:35 Speaker 13: motion was passed at a, is
01:14:37 Speaker 13: to see at our community safety
01:14:38 Speaker 13: committee, and we have a safe
01:14:39 Speaker 13: a community safety committee that sort
01:14:40 Speaker 13: of followed up, and we used
01:14:42 Speaker 13: to have our own police services
01:14:45 Speaker 13: board's meetings or committees. So this
01:14:48 Speaker 13: is sort of a continuation of
01:14:49 Speaker 13: of that body, and to report
01:14:51 Speaker 13: back and have meetings. Can have
01:14:54 Speaker 13: meetings roughly four times a year
01:14:56 Speaker 13: to talk about the safety of
01:14:58 Speaker 13: our municipality. So you can see
01:15:00 Speaker 13: here, as the motion reads, that
01:15:01 Speaker 13: council advocates the county upgrade for
01:15:05 Speaker 13: the installation of a physical traffic
01:15:07 Speaker 13: calming infrastructure for Gray Road 13
01:15:08 Speaker 13: as a pilot initiative for the
01:15:10 Speaker 13: village of Kimberly. So this is
01:15:12 Speaker 13: not unique just for Kimberly. We
01:15:16 Speaker 13: have a lot of small villages
01:15:18 Speaker 13: throughout the county of Gray that
01:15:21 Speaker 13: traverse through a lot of small
01:15:22 Speaker 13: communities, and speeding is is is
01:15:24 Speaker 13: always an issue. If you travel
01:15:25 Speaker 13: to Morning's Mills, down into around
01:15:27 Speaker 13: Fergus and that type of area,
01:15:29 Speaker 13: you'll see those traffic calming devices.
01:15:31 Speaker 13: That sort of are are sort
01:15:33 Speaker 13: of temporary for the summer months.
01:15:35 Speaker 13: That sort of sit there and
01:15:36 Speaker 13: they they do work. They do
01:15:39 Speaker 13: slow down traffic. It's it's they
01:15:40 Speaker 13: they narrow the driving lane. It
01:15:43 Speaker 13: just sort of they're sort of
01:15:46 Speaker 13: physical barriers that sort of stand
01:15:47 Speaker 13: up there. That like I said,
01:15:49 Speaker 13: are are aren't permanent. but are
01:15:50 Speaker 13: seasonal, and then removed for the
01:15:52 Speaker 13: wear months because you can't have
01:15:53 Speaker 13: barriers when you're plowing snow and
01:15:55 Speaker 13: that type of thing. So it
01:15:59 Speaker 13: seems to be something that throughout
01:16:02 Speaker 13: the province, they don't know any
01:16:04 Speaker 13: great county that they use, but
01:16:07 Speaker 13: throughout the province that they have
01:16:09 Speaker 13: these physical barriers. Now they did
01:16:10 Speaker 13: offer with the cancellation of the
01:16:12 Speaker 13: speed cameras, there was offering up
01:16:13 Speaker 13: money for municipalities, and I understand
01:16:16 Speaker 13: there's other funding possibly there for
01:16:18 Speaker 13: that as well. So again, the
01:16:20 Speaker 01: the ask. here is, and again,
01:16:23 Speaker 01: I want to put aside to
01:16:24 Speaker 01: the county over the years. Gray
01:16:25 Speaker 01: Gray Road 13 and the village
01:16:28 Speaker 01: of Kimberly has had a lot
01:16:28 Speaker 01: of items change that has worked
01:16:30 Speaker 01: quite successful for traffic calming in
01:16:31 Speaker 01: the village, and I know it's
01:16:56 Speaker 17: something that's been ongoing for quite
01:16:57 Speaker 01: a few years. So the ask
01:16:59 Speaker 01: here is just to look at
01:17:02 Speaker 01: a possibility at the roads department
01:17:04 Speaker 01: to look at is there something
01:17:05 Speaker 01: that could be investigated with regards
01:17:08 Speaker 01: to physical. traffic calming, that could
01:17:09 Speaker 01: be used as a as a
01:17:13 Speaker 01: as a pilot project and maybe
01:17:15 Speaker 01: also used throughout the county and
01:17:17 Speaker 01: other areas. So that is the
01:17:28 Speaker 01: the request, and also the second
01:17:30 Speaker 01: request that the council requests new
01:17:32 Speaker 01: speed data from the county of
01:17:36 Speaker 01: Gray for the village of Kimberly
01:17:38 Speaker 01: to be reported back to the
01:17:41 Speaker 01: community safety committee. And that is
01:17:42 Speaker 01: something that the county does do
01:17:43 Speaker 01: throughout Gray County, and and so
01:17:48 Speaker 21: they're asking for that for that
01:17:50 Speaker 21: that latest data. So. I like
01:17:56 Speaker 21: to make an amendment to this
01:18:00 Speaker 21: motion to include that we support
01:18:03 Speaker 21: the request here of the Miss
01:18:06 Speaker 21: Valley of Gray Highlands, and maybe
01:18:09 Speaker 21: come back with a report, or
01:18:14 Speaker 21: if it needs to be a
01:18:19 Speaker 21: report, come back how how we
01:18:22 Speaker 21: would initiate the traffic calming and
01:18:24 Speaker 21: also the to move forward with
01:18:27 Speaker 21: providing that information. Okay, thank you.
01:18:30 Speaker 21: I'll look for a seconder, and
01:18:34 Speaker 21: then we'll confirm the wording. Is
01:18:37 Speaker 21: there a seconder? Seconded by Councilor
01:18:41 Speaker 21: Nielsen, so it is on the
01:18:42 Speaker 21: floor. We'll just make sure that
01:18:44 Speaker 21: the clerk. has a moment to
01:18:48 Speaker 21: capture your wording. Okay. So, Councillor
01:18:50 Speaker 21: McLean, can you just have a
01:18:52 Speaker 21: look at the? Oh. that hasn't
01:18:53 Speaker 21: been. That's not showing yet. Okay,
01:18:55 Speaker 01: so the clerk has captured that
01:18:58 Speaker 01: the motion be amended to insert
01:19:01 Speaker 01: the clause that staff be directed
01:19:03 Speaker 01: to follow up with council on
01:19:05 Speaker 01: a report to implement traffic calming
01:19:07 Speaker 01: measures in Kimberley on a trial
01:19:12 Speaker 13: basis. Is is that correct? Okay,
01:19:13 Speaker 13: and that's correct with the seconder.
01:19:15 Speaker 13: Okay, so I'll just as we
01:19:17 Speaker 13: as my mic is still live.
01:19:19 Speaker 13: Okay, implement physical traffic calming measures
01:19:20 Speaker 13: in Kimberley on a trial basis.
01:19:22 Speaker 13: Okay, so it has been moved
01:19:23 Speaker 13: and seconded. It is on the
01:19:25 Speaker 13: floor now for discussion. Councillor Dobrin.
01:19:28 Speaker 13: Thank you. Good morning, and through
01:19:29 Speaker 01: you, Warden. I just wondering. I
01:19:31 Speaker 01: always am. cautious about when we
01:19:33 Speaker 01: provide direction that the report must
01:19:34 Speaker 01: include the implementation of the physical
01:19:37 Speaker 01: traffic calming measures, as opposed to
01:19:39 Speaker 01: a report that provides options available
01:19:42 Speaker 01: and costing to that traffic calming
01:19:45 Speaker 09: measure. Councillor McQueen mentioned just one
01:19:47 Speaker 09: such physical barrier. There may be
01:19:50 Speaker 09: others, as opposed. to the the
01:19:53 Speaker 09: language that says a report that
01:19:55 Speaker 09: implements physical traffic calming measures, it
01:19:57 Speaker 09: almost is it's it's just language.
01:19:59 Speaker 09: But I think we need to
01:20:01 Speaker 09: see the information and then make
01:20:02 Speaker 09: a decision as a whole, as
01:20:05 Speaker 09: opposed to assuming that it will
01:20:06 Speaker 09: be implemented. Okay, so in consultation
01:20:08 Speaker 09: with the clerk, perhaps I'll just
01:20:10 Speaker 09: ask the mover. and seconder if
01:20:13 Speaker 09: this would help clarify your intent
01:20:14 Speaker 09: of the motion on a report
01:20:17 Speaker 09: about the implementation of physical traffic
01:20:20 Speaker 09: calming measures in Kimberley on a
01:20:22 Speaker 09: trial basis. Would that capture correctly
01:20:24 Speaker 09: what you meant to move? Okay,
01:20:28 Speaker 09: I'll I'll let you answer. Yeah,
01:20:30 Speaker 09: yeah, that that that that I
01:20:32 Speaker 09: think that makes good sense to
01:20:34 Speaker 09: have those options that come back
01:20:36 Speaker 09: with that report. Just just for
01:20:37 Speaker 09: clarity, though, there was a second
01:20:39 Speaker 09: ask in that in that motion
01:20:40 Speaker 09: for the. for the data, does
01:20:44 Speaker 09: that have to be included in
01:20:48 Speaker 09: that motion, or is that something
01:20:50 Speaker 09: that could just automatically happen? Okay,
01:20:52 Speaker 09: we'll go to the CAO. I
01:20:53 Speaker 09: did hear that you said that
01:20:56 Speaker 09: is actually already a practice and
01:20:59 Speaker 09: effect of Gray County, so I'll
01:21:01 Speaker 09: look to the CAO. Through
01:21:03 Speaker 09: you, Warden, as relates to
01:21:05 Speaker 09: the the speed data itself, as
01:21:08 Speaker 09: as correctly noted, we collect that,
01:21:09 Speaker 09: try to collect that on a
01:21:11 Speaker 09: regular basis. Transportation Service Staff will.
01:21:13 Speaker 09: be collecting. They've deployed some some
01:21:15 Speaker 09: some of that to capture some
01:21:17 Speaker 09: of that information to have the
01:21:19 Speaker 09: latest data, and happy to share
01:21:20 Speaker 09: that with with Greyhound staff once
01:21:21 Speaker 09: that's captured. We'll probably have that
01:21:24 Speaker 09: and available in the few weeks.
01:21:27 Speaker 09: While I can through you, Warden,
01:21:28 Speaker 09: just to just to speak to
01:21:31 Speaker 09: the matter in terms of when
01:21:32 Speaker 09: we look for opportunities for physical
01:21:35 Speaker 09: cap physical improvements when it comes
01:21:37 Speaker 09: to traffic calming, we've tried different
01:21:39 Speaker 09: measures in various communities across. Craig
01:21:42 Speaker 09: County, we try to incorporate those
01:21:44 Speaker 09: when we're looking at capital improvements
01:21:46 Speaker 09: or a capital project that's part
01:21:48 Speaker 09: of of of that. And so,
01:21:53 Speaker 09: I just wanted to to note
01:21:54 Speaker 09: that that that's our typical practice
01:21:57 Speaker 09: is when we're doing a capital
01:21:59 Speaker 09: project, we would look at opportunities
01:22:02 Speaker 09: to do some sort of traffic
01:22:04 Speaker 09: calming or at least try to
01:22:06 Speaker 09: mitigate some of the impacts that
01:22:08 Speaker 09: we might try to do to
01:22:10 Speaker 09: improve overall safety for for everybody.
01:22:13 Speaker 09: that's using the roadways and and
01:22:15 Speaker 09: those communities. So that's something that
01:22:18 Speaker 09: we normally do as part of
01:22:22 Speaker 09: that practice. We don't have anything
01:22:25 Speaker 09: slated right now in capital program
01:22:27 Speaker 09: for for Kimberly, but of course,
01:22:31 Speaker 13: always willing to work with municipalities
01:22:33 Speaker 13: if there's infrastructure improvements that are
01:22:35 Speaker 13: required for for municipalities that may
01:22:37 Speaker 13: change some of the timing in
01:22:38 Speaker 13: terms of what improvements may may
01:22:40 Speaker 13: come forward. So again, we're happy
01:22:42 Speaker 13: to work with in this case
01:22:44 Speaker 13: Grayhound staff. Curry Island staff, with
01:22:48 Speaker 13: respect to those pieces as well.
01:22:49 Speaker 13: We have tried different measures over
01:22:51 Speaker 13: the years, and Trevor can speak
01:22:54 Speaker 13: to some of the things that
01:22:57 Speaker 13: we've tried in Kimberly specifically: speed
01:22:59 Speaker 13: limit reductions, some signage, some speed
01:23:02 Speaker 13: notification signage. I think that has
01:23:03 Speaker 13: been installed, and some other improvements
01:23:08 Speaker 13: here and there over the number
01:23:09 Speaker 13: of years. Based on the speed
01:23:11 Speaker 13: data we've seen, there hasn't been
01:23:14 Speaker 13: much difference in terms of driver
01:23:15 Speaker 13: behavior for those those measures. We've
01:23:18 Speaker 13: seen that in other cases. to
01:23:20 Speaker 13: across other communities where we've tried
01:23:24 Speaker 13: to implement certain things, some things
01:23:26 Speaker 13: are maybe more helpful, like physical
01:23:28 Speaker 13: improvements. But again, those are typically
01:23:30 Speaker 13: associated with capital projects because they're
01:23:31 Speaker 13: too costly, often to implement outside
01:23:32 Speaker 13: of a capital project. But we'll
01:23:33 Speaker 13: take the direction of council. If
01:23:35 Speaker 13: you want a report, we're happy
01:23:37 Speaker 13: to bring that report back to
01:23:38 Speaker 13: council and explore other options that
01:23:40 Speaker 13: might be available for physical. improvements
01:23:42 Speaker 13: outside of a capital project or
01:23:45 Speaker 13: as part of a capital project.
01:23:47 Speaker 13: Well, Councilor McQueen, you, Madam, thanks
01:23:48 Speaker 13: for that, Madam, Mr. Seale, because
01:23:49 Speaker 13: I think it's something that we're
01:23:51 Speaker 13: seeing throughout our communities is increased
01:23:53 Speaker 13: traffic and increased speeds. I think
01:23:54 Speaker 13: we, everybody talked to, everybody agrees
01:23:57 Speaker 13: with that. You know, there's talk
01:23:59 Speaker 13: about you put speed bumps. Well,
01:24:01 Speaker 13: speed bumps don't work because we
01:24:04 Speaker 13: have snow, and that's you know.
01:24:05 Speaker 13: And there are places where they
01:24:06 Speaker 13: actually put asphalt. Homes, it's I
01:24:08 Speaker 13: don't know how they work with
01:24:11 Speaker 13: that in the winter time. There
01:24:12 Speaker 13: was an accident just recently in
01:24:14 Speaker 13: somewhere just above Kitchener, somewhere down
01:24:17 Speaker 13: that area, where particular farmer was
01:24:19 Speaker 13: going to cut his hay and
01:24:21 Speaker 13: early in the morning, going down
01:24:23 Speaker 13: the road, done it for lifetime,
01:24:25 Speaker 13: drive that to one. other farm,
01:24:27 Speaker 13: and there was a tractor trailer,
01:24:28 Speaker 13: came along, never slowed down, and
01:24:30 Speaker 13: ran into the back of them,
01:24:32 Speaker 13: back of this equipment, and there
01:24:34 Speaker 13: was no sign of any any
01:24:36 Speaker 13: reduction in speed, and and so,
01:24:38 Speaker 13: there, you know, I guess there's
01:24:39 Speaker 13: just in time for delivery, you
01:24:40 Speaker 13: know, with the commercial vehicles, they
01:24:41 Speaker 13: just, they, you know, they have
01:24:43 Speaker 13: to get there, and understandably, they
01:24:45 Speaker 13: got a job to do as
01:24:47 Speaker 13: well. It's just in the point
01:24:48 Speaker 13: of of you know, community like
01:24:50 Speaker 13: can really no different other. Community
01:24:51 Speaker 13: like can really no different than
01:24:53 Speaker 13: others. There's two things unique there.
01:24:55 Speaker 13: They don't have sidewalks. Number two
01:24:57 Speaker 13: is there is a slope, and
01:24:59 Speaker 13: it has a tendency to keep
01:25:01 Speaker 13: people a little higher. And I
01:25:03 Speaker 13: know that the county has done
01:25:05 Speaker 13: some great things with reduction of
01:25:07 Speaker 13: speed, reduction of speed further up
01:25:09 Speaker 13: the hill. It just seems to
01:25:10 Speaker 13: be, from what I gather, communities
01:25:11 Speaker 13: have had those physical barriers put
01:25:12 Speaker 13: up. There is a psychological thing
01:25:15 Speaker 13: that does have a tendency to
01:25:16 Speaker 13: slow you down, and they're and
01:25:17 Speaker 13: they're moved like if you hit
01:25:19 Speaker 13: them. they'll move. It's not going
01:25:20 Speaker 13: to like something that's that's permanent
01:25:23 Speaker 01: or solid. It's something that does
01:25:25 Speaker 01: have a tendency to slow you
01:25:28 Speaker 01: down. And I know just in
01:25:29 Speaker 01: in Rivanna, you talked about some
01:25:31 Speaker 01: of the ones that you've incorporated
01:25:33 Speaker 01: into your road construction. You know,
01:25:35 Speaker 01: I'm sure people going north go,
01:25:37 Speaker 01: "That's new, that's different." But it,
01:25:40 Speaker 01: you know, there's a physical barrier
01:25:43 Speaker 01: in the middle of the of
01:25:47 Speaker 01: the two lanes. And why was
01:25:48 Speaker 21: that? Well, I know Rivanna has
01:25:49 Speaker 21: always been historically an area where
01:25:53 Speaker 21: speeding has been an issue, so
01:25:55 Speaker 21: you know I think we know
01:25:59 Speaker 21: that people have to get from
01:26:04 Speaker 21: point A to B, and I
01:26:06 Speaker 21: don't think we're anything. We're trying
01:26:09 Speaker 21: to stop that, but if it
01:26:13 Speaker 21: takes you know ten or ten,
01:26:18 Speaker 21: twelve seconds longer in your day
01:26:20 Speaker 21: to slow people down, I think
01:26:22 Speaker 21: that's well worth that point of
01:26:27 Speaker 21: of safety and that sort of
01:26:31 Speaker 21: thing. So it's it's a request
01:26:34 Speaker 21: that, and this is not something
01:26:37 Speaker 21: that is we're asking through this
01:26:39 Speaker 21: motion specifically for for Kimberly. We
01:26:42 Speaker 21: have other communities throughout Craig County
01:26:45 Speaker 21: that you know, and we're saying.
01:26:48 Speaker 21: you could use this as a,
01:26:50 Speaker 21: as a trial area, and something
01:26:52 Speaker 21: works, something doesn't work. But certainly,
01:26:54 Speaker 21: with options coming back, I think
01:26:56 Speaker 21: it's something that we sort of
01:26:59 Speaker 21: have to be mindful in. How
01:27:02 Speaker 21: do we try to slow that
01:27:05 Speaker 21: public? And we have growth. Our
01:27:08 Speaker 21: growth has continued to put more
01:27:10 Speaker 21: and more traffic on our roads
01:27:12 Speaker 21: as well. So I'll leave it
01:27:14 Speaker 01: at that, Mr. Adam Ward. Okay,
01:27:15 Speaker 01: thank you very much. And I
01:27:18 Speaker 01: do know that the discussion about
01:27:20 Speaker 01: temporary speed bumps that can be
01:27:21 Speaker 01: removed during the winter season has
01:27:23 Speaker 01: also been. something that's been floating
01:27:25 Speaker 01: out there in the in the
01:27:27 Speaker 01: roads infrastructure universe. So I'm sure
01:27:37 Speaker 01: that any of the the potential
01:27:39 Speaker 13: options under this this motion would
01:27:42 Speaker 13: be included in in reports, Councillor
01:27:44 Speaker 13: Dubrein. Thank you. And I was
01:27:46 Speaker 13: actually going to wait for the
01:27:49 Speaker 13: report to come back before debating
01:27:50 Speaker 13: options. But you through you Warden,
01:27:52 Speaker 13: you mentioned the temporary speed bumps.
01:27:55 Speaker 13: I actually asked this question of.
01:27:59 Speaker 01: transportation staff locally, and they do
01:28:00 Speaker 01: need to be mounted into the
01:28:01 Speaker 01: pavement. When you drill a hole
01:28:02 Speaker 01: or create a imperfection in the
01:28:03 Speaker 01: pavement, come our winters with freezes
01:28:04 Speaker 01: and thaws that allows moisture into
01:28:06 Speaker 01: the pavement, which reduces the longevity
01:28:08 Speaker 01: of the pavement. I wanted to
01:28:09 Speaker 01: just talk. about the sign that
01:28:11 Speaker 01: goes on the center line, they
01:28:13 Speaker 01: have one in Formosa. It does;
01:28:17 Speaker 01: it's very effective. It catches your
01:28:19 Speaker 01: attention. You slow down, but again,
01:28:21 Speaker 01: you're mounting that into the pavement.
01:28:24 Speaker 22: So we have to weigh those
01:28:25 Speaker 22: costs. And I will look forward
01:28:27 Speaker 22: to having the Folsom report in
01:28:29 Speaker 22: order to evaluate what makes sense
01:28:33 Speaker 22: and where we can maybe employ.
01:28:35 Speaker 22: different options in our various hamlets
01:28:38 Speaker 22: to to explore what works, what
01:28:41 Speaker 22: doesn't, and and the costs associated
01:28:44 Speaker 22: with those. Okay, thank you. So
01:28:47 Speaker 22: that is the intent of this
01:28:50 Speaker 22: motion: is to capture the potential
01:28:52 Speaker 22: options because it is specified that
01:28:54 Speaker 22: it'll be options that'll be entertained
01:28:57 Speaker 22: in the report. So we're we're
01:29:01 Speaker 22: not in a debate about about
01:29:04 Speaker 22: which ones are best. We're asking
01:29:06 Speaker 22: for a report about the options,
01:29:11 Speaker 22: but it's important that we all
01:29:13 Speaker 22: understand what we. can expect from
01:29:14 Speaker 22: the report, Councilor McQueen. A brief
01:29:15 Speaker 22: follow up. There we go. Briefly,
01:29:18 Speaker 22: in the sense that to also
01:29:22 Speaker 22: investigate funding, because there has been
01:29:23 Speaker 22: originally funding from the province when
01:29:25 Speaker 22: they disband the traffic cameras. But
01:29:27 Speaker 22: there's, I heard something that there's
01:29:31 Speaker 22: more funding coming. I think that
01:29:34 Speaker 22: would also help if that. It
01:29:35 Speaker 22: also help if that's investigated and
01:29:38 Speaker 22: what options are there as well.
01:29:40 Speaker 01: Okay, thank you. So I think
01:29:41 Speaker 01: we can we can expect that
01:29:42 Speaker 01: if we leave it and if
01:29:44 Speaker 01: this motion is passed and we
01:29:46 Speaker 01: leave it in the hands of
01:29:49 Speaker 01: staff, they will work collaboratively with
01:29:51 Speaker 01: each other in terms of of
01:29:53 Speaker 01: giving us that kind of information
01:29:55 Speaker 01: that we would have to contemplate
01:30:00 Speaker 01: as well. And with that, we'll
01:30:03 Speaker 01: go to Councillor Gray. I'll just
01:30:05 Speaker 01: note the reason I'll vote against
01:30:07 Speaker 01: the motion as it's presented right
01:30:09 Speaker 01: now is it does. name a
01:30:11 Speaker 01: specific community? I would have no
01:30:13 Speaker 01: problem with a report coming back.
01:30:15 Speaker 01: I get it. Kimberly's the catalyst
01:30:16 Speaker 01: for the discussion, but we have
01:30:18 Speaker 01: not heard from staff that Kimberly
01:30:19 Speaker 01: is any worse than Desborough or
01:30:21 Speaker 01: Hopeville or Scone or a plethora
01:30:26 Speaker 13: of other communities within the county.
01:30:27 Speaker 13: So to isolate it by naming
01:30:29 Speaker 13: Kimberly in the motion gives me
01:30:33 Speaker 13: pause and reason. to vote against
01:30:36 Speaker 13: it. If you want to amend
01:30:40 Speaker 13: it to examine physical traffic calming
01:30:43 Speaker 13: measures in the county, which we're
01:30:44 Speaker 13: charged with oversight for as a
01:30:45 Speaker 13: whole, I could be supportive of
01:30:49 Speaker 13: that. I wouldn't presume anything, you
01:30:51 Speaker 13: know, in terms of cost on
01:30:54 Speaker 13: the taxpayer in advance. I would
01:30:56 Speaker 13: wait for the report, but I
01:30:57 Speaker 13: don't think it's appropriate. I get
01:30:58 Speaker 13: it. Kimberly was the impetus for
01:31:00 Speaker 13: the discussion at Great Highlands, but
01:31:01 Speaker 13: I don't think the amendment should
01:31:03 Speaker 13: name a specific community in terms
01:31:04 Speaker 13: of bringing the report back. Okay,
01:31:05 Speaker 13: I have a thought on this.
01:31:06 Speaker 13: Looking at the way that it
01:31:08 Speaker 13: reads and hearing the discussion, the
01:31:10 Speaker 13: idea is that perhaps if something
01:31:12 Speaker 13: were to come through on the
01:31:13 Speaker 13: report that looks like a good
01:31:15 Speaker 13: match for a trial in Kimberly,
01:31:17 Speaker 13: that it might be a countywide
01:31:18 Speaker 13: trial. It might be deemed. as
01:31:20 Speaker 13: a good mechanism to test out,
01:31:21 Speaker 13: and it may be or may
01:31:23 Speaker 13: not be selected in Kimberly. I'm
01:31:25 Speaker 13: going to look to the mover
01:31:26 Speaker 13: mover to identify if this is
01:31:28 Speaker 13: because I'm I'm reading it in
01:31:30 Speaker 13: Kimberly on a trial basis. So
01:31:31 Speaker 13: I'm hearing Councillor Graves' concern that
01:31:35 Speaker 13: it is tied to a specific
01:31:36 Speaker 13: location, but I've heard you talking
01:31:42 Speaker 01: about that this could be a
01:31:44 Speaker 01: good trial for the county to
01:31:45 Speaker 01: see what. For the county to
01:31:47 Speaker 01: see what's going on and and
01:31:49 Speaker 01: what we could best do, so
01:31:56 Speaker 01: may I just ask for clarification
01:31:58 Speaker 01: from the mover on that? Sorry,
01:32:02 Speaker 01: yeah, I can maybe try to
01:32:05 Speaker 01: add some clarity. I mean, certainly
01:32:07 Speaker 01: the community of Kimberly have been
01:32:09 Speaker 01: very concerned, I would say. And
01:32:10 Speaker 01: sir, certainly, I would say it
01:32:12 Speaker 01: could be removed, maybe with the
01:32:13 Speaker 01: motion attached. That that sort of
01:32:15 Speaker 01: shows where it came from. I
01:32:17 Speaker 01: I just think that. Where it
01:32:20 Speaker 01: came from, I just think that
01:32:21 Speaker 01: they are quite willing to offer
01:32:23 Speaker 01: up that community. It's and the
01:32:25 Speaker 01: whole point was, I think, was
01:32:26 Speaker 01: not to put the burden and
01:32:29 Speaker 01: as far as cost across the
01:32:32 Speaker 01: whole municipality. I don't think it
01:32:34 Speaker 01: was looking like special treatment. It
01:32:37 Speaker 01: was more or less in the
01:32:39 Speaker 01: sense that you know we we
01:32:41 Speaker 01: know there's an issue. We've been
01:32:44 Speaker 01: working on this for a long
01:32:45 Speaker 01: time. There is the decline of
01:32:48 Speaker 01: the road. There's it just seems
01:32:50 Speaker 01: to be a community with no
01:32:55 Speaker 01: sidewalk. Just it's a community that's
01:32:58 Speaker 23: very concerned, and they're offering it
01:32:59 Speaker 23: up. as a trial basis. I
01:33:03 Speaker 23: don't think it's. They're not trying
01:33:04 Speaker 23: to be taking it away from
01:33:08 Speaker 23: anywhere else. They're just offering it
01:33:10 Speaker 23: up as as a place to.
01:33:12 Speaker 23: But I. I mean, if if
01:33:15 Speaker 23: it needs to be removed, I
01:33:17 Speaker 23: think then I think you just
01:33:19 Speaker 23: needed to reference to the resolution
01:33:23 Speaker 01: that came. So then there's reference
01:33:25 Speaker 01: that if if it comes back
01:33:26 Speaker 01: from the report, it's still it's
01:33:27 Speaker 01: still there that that option is
01:33:29 Speaker 01: is available to the county. So
01:33:30 Speaker 01: I guess in in. I'll accept
01:33:32 Speaker 01: the point of. order, but I
01:33:34 Speaker 01: did ask the question to the
01:33:37 Speaker 01: to the mover. So, so, so
01:33:39 Speaker 01: I would like to hear the
01:33:41 Speaker 01: mover finish the thought. And he
01:33:43 Speaker 01: he is. This is the amendment
01:33:45 Speaker 01: is moved by Councillor McQueen and
01:33:47 Speaker 01: seconded by Councillor Nielsen. So, Councillor
01:33:49 Speaker 01: McQueen. So I'm hearing that I'm
01:33:51 Speaker 01: a. What I would like to
01:33:52 Speaker 01: do to make clean process on
01:33:55 Speaker 01: the minutes that will follow the.
01:33:57 Speaker 01: On the minutes that will follow
01:33:59 Speaker 13: this discussion, is you are right,
01:34:01 Speaker 13: you are correct. If this primary,
01:34:02 Speaker 13: if this amendment to the main
01:34:06 Speaker 13: motion passes, it will be attached
01:34:10 Speaker 13: to that original motion, which is
01:34:13 Speaker 13: Councillor Nielsen and Councillor Greggs, which
01:34:16 Speaker 13: refers to the correspondence. So it
01:34:19 Speaker 13: will definitely be embedded there that
01:34:23 Speaker 13: this is in response to the
01:34:25 Speaker 13: correspondence. But because we've already delved
01:34:26 Speaker 13: into discussion on this particular amendment
01:34:28 Speaker 13: to the main motion, I I
01:34:30 Speaker 13: would like to be able to
01:34:31 Speaker 13: I'll look to the clerk. We
01:34:33 Speaker 13: could do an additional amendment to
01:34:35 Speaker 13: this amendment to remove Kimberly. Or
01:34:37 Speaker 13: I'm going to look to the
01:34:38 Speaker 13: clerk to make sure that we're
01:34:39 Speaker 13: we're following very carefully the discussion
01:34:41 Speaker 13: process that we've been in. I
01:34:42 Speaker 13: would I would agree with that.
01:34:43 Speaker 13: There could be an amendment done
01:34:45 Speaker 13: to remove the reference to Kimberly
01:34:48 Speaker 13: to apply more to a county
01:34:50 Speaker 13: wide basis or. Keeping it as
01:34:52 Speaker 13: is, I think gives the option
01:34:54 Speaker 13: to, if successful, and can relieve
01:34:56 Speaker 13: for future implementation throughout the county.
01:34:58 Speaker 13: But I think those are the
01:35:00 Speaker 13: two immediate paths I see at
01:35:02 Speaker 13: this point in time. Okay, so
01:35:06 Speaker 13: in order for us to be
01:35:07 Speaker 13: respectful of all of the input
01:35:10 Speaker 13: that we've heard along the way,
01:35:12 Speaker 13: there's a main motion way at
01:35:15 Speaker 13: the back. We're at an amendment
01:35:16 Speaker 01: to the main motion. If somebody
01:35:18 Speaker 01: would like to amend this amendment
01:35:22 Speaker 01: to the main motion. to suggest
01:35:25 Speaker 01: removing in Kimberly so that it
01:35:26 Speaker 01: is representational of what we've heard
01:35:28 Speaker 01: about a county basis. I can
01:35:30 Speaker 01: allow that from either. It can
01:35:31 Speaker 01: be moved by anybody here at
01:35:34 Speaker 01: at the at the horseshoe. So,
01:35:35 Speaker 01: is there somebody that would like
01:35:37 Speaker 01: to move an amendment to the
01:35:39 Speaker 01: main mo an an amendment to
01:35:43 Speaker 01: the amendment? Got to be careful.
01:35:45 Speaker 01: Yes. Point of clarity, Councilor McQueen.
01:35:47 Speaker 01: So, I guess the point of
01:35:51 Speaker 01: clarity is what I'm seeking here
01:35:55 Speaker 09: is the village of Kimberly. Kimberley,
01:35:57 Speaker 09: the speed drops from eighty, seventy,
01:35:59 Speaker 09: sixty, forty. Do we want traffic
01:36:01 Speaker 09: calming on our eighty-kilometer, or seventy-kilometer,
01:36:04 Speaker 09: or sixty-kilometer? This is a forty-kilometer
01:36:06 Speaker 09: zone. So, do we need clarity,
01:36:08 Speaker 09: and and and on where we're
01:36:10 Speaker 09: looking for traffic calming? I mean,
01:36:12 Speaker 09: this is this is getting into
01:36:14 Speaker 09: a big. You know, it was
01:36:15 Speaker 09: referenced. Kimberly is it's it is
01:36:17 Speaker 09: a community on a county road
01:36:19 Speaker 09: that has a. reduction in speed
01:36:22 Speaker 09: to 40 kilometers an hour. It's
01:36:23 Speaker 09: not mentioned in here, but do
01:36:24 Speaker 09: we need to zero in of
01:36:27 Speaker 09: what we're looking for traffic calming?
01:36:28 Speaker 09: Because you could still look for
01:36:29 Speaker 09: traffic calming at 80 kilometers an
01:36:31 Speaker 09: hour. I don't know. I don't
01:36:33 Speaker 09: have that answer. But the idea
01:36:36 Speaker 09: is, is Kimberly is is an
01:36:40 Speaker 09: example of other small communities within
01:36:47 Speaker 09: our Ray Ray County road network
01:36:51 Speaker 13: that have reduction in speed from
01:36:52 Speaker 13: the normal speed. I don't know.
01:36:56 Speaker 13: I'm asking that clarity on that
01:36:58 Speaker 13: sense because it makes reference to
01:37:15 Speaker 13: Kimberly because of the circumstance. that
01:37:17 Speaker 01: is there for for the speed
01:37:20 Speaker 01: reduction. Okay, so just before I
01:37:22 Speaker 01: look to staff and to the
01:37:24 Speaker 01: clerk, I will note that in
01:37:26 Speaker 01: order for should should this be
01:37:28 Speaker 01: amended, should this amendment go to
01:37:33 Speaker 01: the main motion if this is
01:37:34 Speaker 01: is passed through this process, staff
01:37:37 Speaker 01: would automatically be taking into consideration
01:37:38 Speaker 01: speed because that that's going to
01:37:40 Speaker 01: be part of the formula in
01:37:41 Speaker 01: which they they advocate for what.
01:37:43 Speaker 01: can work and what cannot work.
01:37:45 Speaker 01: So I would think that that
01:37:48 Speaker 01: would be already understood. That it
01:37:52 Speaker 01: would have to be with a
01:37:53 Speaker 01: lens of of speed. But I'll
01:37:56 Speaker 01: look to either the CAO or
01:37:59 Speaker 01: to Mr. Ireton for clarification on
01:38:01 Speaker 01: their understanding of of what would
01:38:04 Speaker 01: this motion look like in a
01:38:06 Speaker 01: staff report. Through you, Warden. For
01:38:09 Speaker 01: most of our physical traffic calming
01:38:10 Speaker 01: measures that we've looked at in
01:38:12 Speaker 01: the past, they are. they are
01:38:14 Speaker 01: associated with within communities and would
01:38:17 Speaker 01: be associated with areas where we
01:38:19 Speaker 01: have tapered speeds from 80 down
01:38:21 Speaker 01: to a lower speed limit. So
01:38:25 Speaker 01: so that's the area focus that
01:38:27 Speaker 01: that we would assume that we'd
01:38:31 Speaker 01: be looking at in terms of
01:38:36 Speaker 01: exploring any options. If that's the
01:38:39 Speaker 20: direction, a council is to look
01:38:43 Speaker 20: for those traffic calming measure options
01:38:45 Speaker 20: in communities of that nature, similar
01:38:48 Speaker 20: to Kimberly, similar to some of
01:38:51 Speaker 20: the other communities that have been
01:38:58 Speaker 20: mentioned. Those are the those are
01:38:59 Speaker 20: the areas that we'd be looking
01:39:01 Speaker 20: at where there's that those speed
01:39:04 Speaker 20: reductions from like 80 down to
01:39:12 Speaker 20: a lower lower speed limit zone,
01:39:15 Speaker 20: and where there's there's some built
01:39:17 Speaker 20: built up area in terms of
01:39:20 Speaker 20: communities, homes, stores, things of that
01:39:22 Speaker 20: nature. The traffic calming measures within
01:39:27 Speaker 20: hamlets and built up areas within
01:39:28 Speaker 20: Gray County. That cover it. That
01:39:31 Speaker 20: covered. Okay, so Madam Clerk, to
01:39:33 Speaker 20: remove in Kimberly and insert. Okay,
01:39:34 Speaker 20: so the amendment to the amendment
01:39:36 Speaker 20: now reads that the motion be
01:39:38 Speaker 20: that the the motion be amended
01:39:39 Speaker 20: to remove in Kimberly and insert
01:39:45 Speaker 20: Hamlet. In and insert hamlets and
01:39:47 Speaker 20: built-up areas within the county road
01:39:50 Speaker 20: system. Is there a seconder? We've
01:39:52 Speaker 20: got it moved by Councillor McQueen.
01:39:57 Speaker 20: Okay, I'll put out another call.
01:40:01 Speaker 20: Is there a seconder? Okay, it's
01:40:06 Speaker 20: seconded by Councillor Kentner. So that's
01:40:11 Speaker 20: now on the floor for discussion.
01:40:25 Speaker 20: The only discussion we're having now
01:40:27 Speaker 20: is the removal of In Kimberley
01:40:39 Speaker 20: and the addition of hamlets and
01:40:40 Speaker 20: built-up areas within the county road
01:40:42 Speaker 20: system. Any discussion on that? Seeing
01:40:49 Speaker 20: no hands. up, all in favor
01:40:53 Speaker 20: of that amendment. Okay, and that
01:40:59 Speaker 20: amendment passes. So now, the back
01:41:01 Speaker 20: to the first, the primary amendment.
01:41:04 Speaker 20: It now reads that the motion
01:41:08 Speaker 20: be the main motion be amended
01:41:10 Speaker 20: to insert a clause that staff
01:41:13 Speaker 20: that staff be directed to follow
01:41:16 Speaker 20: up with council on a report
01:41:17 Speaker 20: to investigate options to implement physical
01:41:21 Speaker 20: traffic calming measures in hamlets and
01:41:23 Speaker 20: built up areas within the county
01:41:24 Speaker 20: road. Agree the county road system
01:41:26 Speaker 20: on a trial basis. Okay, we're
01:41:29 Speaker 20: back to discussing now. Then, therefore,
01:41:31 Speaker 20: the whole main motion. Any further
01:41:33 Speaker 20: discussion there, Councillor Eccles? Thank you,
01:41:36 Speaker 20: Madam Warden. Implement physical traffic calming
01:41:38 Speaker 20: measures. We have already implemented how
01:41:41 Speaker 20: many on a number of county
01:41:43 Speaker 20: roads over the years, especially on
01:41:47 Speaker 20: County Road 13. Thirteen in the
01:41:51 Speaker 20: Hamlet area of Kimberley, and obviously
01:41:54 Speaker 20: none of them have worked yet,
01:41:59 Speaker 20: or we wouldn't be back here
01:42:01 Speaker 20: to where we are today, to
01:42:03 Speaker 20: the satisfaction of some individuals in
01:42:09 Speaker 20: that area. I've always struggled with
01:42:12 Speaker 20: this, as we had a report
01:42:15 Speaker 20: this morning showing a. This morning,
01:42:20 Speaker 01: showing the construction and how we
01:42:23 Speaker 01: smoothed out the roads so that
01:42:25 Speaker 01: traffic can flow more effectively and
01:42:26 Speaker 01: efficiently. And then an hour or
01:42:29 Speaker 01: so later, we're debating on how
01:42:30 Speaker 01: to slow it all down. Well,
01:42:32 Speaker 01: we shouldn't have spent three million
01:42:35 Speaker 01: dollars on frigging road. We should
01:42:37 Speaker 01: have just left the potholes there,
01:42:38 Speaker 01: and people would have had to
01:42:40 Speaker 01: slow down. It does work. So
01:42:43 Speaker 01: maybe looking at staff. that might
01:42:45 Speaker 01: be one of the ways. Truly,
01:42:47 Speaker 01: the only way to slow the
01:42:49 Speaker 01: traffic down, and it's traffic, it's
01:42:52 Speaker 01: physical driver performance. You put up
01:42:53 Speaker 01: a traffic sign, the electronic one,
01:42:55 Speaker 01: and the guys and girls, who
01:42:58 Speaker 01: are driving to excess, well. No.
01:43:00 Speaker 01: Sorry. No, something is sensitive on
01:43:02 Speaker 01: my my monitor. Thank you very
01:43:03 Speaker 01: much. That just gives me a
01:43:04 Speaker 01: bit of a break to refresh
01:43:07 Speaker 01: here and really get going now.
01:43:11 Speaker 01: I think that it is the
01:43:12 Speaker 01: physical presence of traffic control officers
01:43:17 Speaker 01: that are going to be implemented.
01:43:19 Speaker 01: If it becomes known that this
01:43:21 Speaker 01: area or other areas are speed
01:43:24 Speaker 01: traps, and that enforcement is going
01:43:25 Speaker 01: to be there by the physical.
01:43:28 Speaker 01: presence of a ticket, maybe it'll
01:43:30 Speaker 01: offset some of our court costs
01:43:33 Speaker 01: as well too. But the physical
01:43:34 Speaker 01: ticket is going to be the
01:43:41 Speaker 01: is always been my thought of
01:43:45 Speaker 24: that's going to be the answer,
01:43:51 Speaker 24: because the people that are driving
01:43:52 Speaker 24: past an eighty kilometer or forty
01:43:54 Speaker 24: kilometers that are twenty or thirty
01:43:56 Speaker 01: kilometers over that, I'm just not
01:43:57 Speaker 01: certain how any physical thing is
01:44:00 Speaker 01: going to stop it. A lot
01:44:01 Speaker 01: of staff time is going to
01:44:02 Speaker 01: be expanded here. I just have
01:44:03 Speaker 01: difficulty with it. Without any backup,
01:44:05 Speaker 01: that there's been any real problem,
01:44:06 Speaker 01: other than offending a few people.
01:44:08 Speaker 01: That think the cars are going
01:44:11 Speaker 01: past and fast in that area,
01:44:12 Speaker 01: has there been considerable accidents and
01:44:14 Speaker 01: violence? traffic. I don't believe so.
01:44:17 Speaker 01: I can't support this. Thank you.
01:44:19 Speaker 01: Cut me off now. Okay. Thank
01:44:22 Speaker 01: you. We do need to keep
01:44:24 Speaker 01: in mind that our job is
01:44:27 Speaker 01: about the roads and about what
01:44:29 Speaker 01: we can do. Enforcement by police
01:44:38 Speaker 01: is not something that we, as
01:44:40 Speaker 01: a body here, as a county
01:44:42 Speaker 01: council, can can influence. All of
01:44:44 Speaker 01: us, I think, believe all of
01:44:46 Speaker 01: us sit on. sit on police
01:44:49 Speaker 01: boards. That is a whole separate
01:44:51 Speaker 01: matter for a whole separate governance
01:44:54 Speaker 01: understanding. That everybody's budgets are tight.
01:44:56 Speaker 01: Everybody is stretched. We cannot. We
01:44:58 Speaker 01: we don't have the luxury of
01:44:59 Speaker 01: assigning police officers at every hamlet
01:45:01 Speaker 01: across Gray County in order to
01:45:02 Speaker 01: be able to preserve that as
01:45:05 Speaker 01: effective as that may be. Acknowledging
01:45:07 Speaker 01: that that that would be the
01:45:09 Speaker 01: most effective method. It it isn't
01:45:11 Speaker 01: necessarily what we're able to do.
01:45:19 Speaker 01: So we do have to keep
01:45:22 Speaker 01: our focus and our discussion onto
01:45:23 Speaker 01: Focus in our discussion onto this.
01:45:28 Speaker 04: I will note that lunch is
01:45:29 Speaker 04: now overdue. So, with that, I
01:45:31 Speaker 04: will look and see if there's
01:45:33 Speaker 04: any further discussion. Okay. So, hearing
01:45:35 Speaker 04: no further discussion, seeing no further
01:45:37 Speaker 04: hands up, then we do have
01:45:41 Speaker 04: that main motion that has been
01:45:43 Speaker 04: amended. It does include reference to
01:45:46 Speaker 04: the letters, but it has now
01:45:47 Speaker 04: been amended as as the primary
01:45:48 Speaker 04: and secondary motions. So, I'll call
01:45:49 Speaker 04: the question. Then all. those in
01:45:51 Speaker 04: favor, and that motion carries. Okay.
01:45:52 Speaker 04: So with that, then, oh, we
01:45:54 Speaker 04: haven't done that part. Okay. So
01:45:56 Speaker 04: thank you. That was the clerk
01:45:58 Speaker 04: just reminded me. I'm one step
01:46:01 Speaker 04: ahead. We still now need to
01:46:03 Speaker 04: embody it into the main motion.
01:46:05 Speaker 04: So we now have the main
01:46:06 Speaker 04: motion. I better read it just
01:46:08 Speaker 04: to make sure we're all clear
01:46:10 Speaker 04: on what. we're voting on here,
01:46:11 Speaker 04: that the correspondence from the Municipality
01:46:13 Speaker 04: of Grey Highlands regarding traffic calming
01:46:15 Speaker 04: measures on Grey Road 13 be
01:46:16 Speaker 04: received for information, and that staff
01:46:18 Speaker 04: be directed to follow up with
01:46:19 Speaker 04: Council on a report to investigate
01:46:21 Speaker 04: options to implement physical traffic calming
01:46:24 Speaker 04: measures in hamlets and built-up areas
01:46:27 Speaker 04: within the Grey the County Road
01:46:28 Speaker 01: System on a trial basis. Any
01:46:29 Speaker 01: further discussion now, as it has
01:46:31 Speaker 01: now become the main motion. Okay.
01:46:33 Speaker 01: All those in favor? And that
01:46:36 Speaker 01: motion carries. Okay. Thank you very
01:46:36 Speaker 01: much. So with that, we have
01:46:38 Speaker 01: one more item to entertain. It's
01:46:42 Speaker 01: item six E. It's recommended that
6.e FR-CW-13-26 Capital Project Status Update Report as of April 30, 2025
The report details the status of capital projects as of April 30th, noting that road paving work scheduled for summer remains incomplete and will not be marked finished until later in the year. A detailed budget book is available via General Gray County Open Book to track specific project statuses across departments. Regarding waste management, staff confirm plans exist to engage with all nine member municipal councils following initial site visits by consultants. Significant cost overages on two structures located on County Road 40 and Concession Two are attributed to the decision that sheet piling must be sacrificial rather than reusable, alongside higher-than-expected precast fabrication costs driven by steel pricing changes.
01:46:44 Speaker 01: report FRCW thirteen twenty six regarding
01:46:45 Speaker 01: a twenty twenty six capital project
01:46:46 Speaker 01: status update as of April thirtieth,
01:46:47 Speaker 01: twenty twenty six be received for
01:46:49 Speaker 01: information. May I ask for a
01:46:51 Speaker 01: mover and a second? Move by
01:46:53 Speaker 01: Councilor Gregg. Seconded. Moved by Councillor
01:46:54 Speaker 01: Greg, seconded by Councillor Pringle. It's
01:46:56 Speaker 01: now on the floor for discussion.
01:46:58 Speaker 01: And so, with that, Manager Reed,
01:47:00 Speaker 01: if you'd like to come back
01:47:02 Speaker 01: to the lectern and provide us
01:47:04 Speaker 22: any insight before we go into
01:47:06 Speaker 22: discussion, thank you. Through the Warden,
01:47:08 Speaker 22: thank you. Similar to what I've
01:47:12 Speaker 22: said for the the operating report,
01:47:14 Speaker 22: a lot of work happens from.
01:47:16 Speaker 22: January to April on the procurement
01:47:18 Speaker 22: side. So if we look at
01:47:20 Speaker 22: Figure One in the chart, where
01:47:22 Speaker 22: projects are, whether they've been awarded,
01:47:24 Speaker 22: the procurements in progress, or whether
01:47:26 Speaker 22: procurement isn't applicable. But the video
01:47:29 Speaker 22: that Trevor shared earlier in the
01:47:31 Speaker 22: meeting, those roads weren't paved as
01:47:34 Speaker 22: of April 30th, so a lot
01:47:36 Speaker 22: of them won't be marked as
01:47:38 Speaker 22: completed. A lot of that work
01:47:41 Speaker 22: happened in the summer, into the
01:47:45 Speaker 22: the later months in the year.
01:47:47 Speaker 22: So where we're at as far
01:47:50 Speaker 22: as project completion and statuses, I
01:47:53 Speaker 22: think is pretty consistent with previous
01:47:54 Speaker 09: years. And then attached the report
01:47:55 Speaker 09: is the detail of every single
01:47:57 Speaker 09: project and where they're at, and
01:48:00 Speaker 09: comments where applicable, and what we've
01:48:02 Speaker 09: committed. And we also did prepare
01:48:03 Speaker 09: a budget book, which is linked
01:48:07 Speaker 09: in the report or can be
01:48:09 Speaker 09: accessed through our General Gray County
01:48:12 Speaker 09: Open Book site, where you can.
01:48:14 Speaker 09: It works more like an Excel
01:48:17 Speaker 09: sheet as opposed to a PDF,
01:48:19 Speaker 09: where you can actually filter for
01:48:22 Speaker 09: certain projects or departments and look
01:48:24 Speaker 09: up specific items. And with that,
01:48:27 Speaker 09: I'm happy to take any questions.
01:48:29 Speaker 09: Okay, thank you very much. And
01:48:30 Speaker 09: yes, I know it would be
01:48:33 Speaker 09: wonderful if finance could produce lovely
01:48:35 Speaker 09: videos to to make all these
01:48:37 Speaker 09: numbers come alive. But you have
01:48:39 Speaker 09: touched on the point that it's
01:48:41 Speaker 09: so important that this is really
01:48:43 Speaker 09: a cross-sector, cross-department item, and this
01:48:44 Speaker 09: allows us a picture is worth
01:48:49 Speaker 09: a thousand words. So to be
01:48:51 Speaker 25: able to drive on a road
01:49:00 Speaker 25: or to be able to see
01:49:02 Speaker 25: it in the video today really
01:49:03 Speaker 26: really helps support the information that
01:49:04 Speaker 26: you've provided us in terms of
01:49:07 Speaker 26: the numbers and figures. so thank
01:49:11 Speaker 26: you for that. So, with that,
01:49:13 Speaker 26: I will look to Councillor Greg,
01:49:16 Speaker 26: who had pulled the item. Well,
01:49:17 Speaker 26: apparently nobody likes a Scott that
01:49:20 Speaker 26: stands between them and lunch. So,
01:49:24 Speaker 26: my two questions are brief. First
01:49:25 Speaker 26: question: There is in the attached
01:49:27 Speaker 26: table references to the waste management
01:49:30 Speaker 26: study that's being done. My first
01:49:32 Speaker 26: question there to staff is: Are
01:49:36 Speaker 26: there plans to actually engage with
01:49:38 Speaker 26: municipal councils on that? It does
01:49:41 Speaker 26: speak to municipal staff, but. just
01:49:42 Speaker 26: wondering about the level of engagement
01:49:45 Speaker 26: with councils. And second question is
01:49:47 Speaker 26: regarding two structures on County
01:49:52 Speaker 26: Road 40, which I believe was
01:49:55 Speaker 26: about 3.1 million dollars budget, and
01:49:57 Speaker 26: it's almost a million dollars in
01:49:59 Speaker 26: overage, including contingency. So just wondering
01:50:00 Speaker 26: if staff can comment on what
01:50:01 Speaker 26: obstacles have arisen from from those
01:50:03 Speaker 26: projects or any key takeaways that
01:50:04 Speaker 26: council needs to be aware of.
01:50:07 Speaker 26: Okay, so we're going to start
01:50:08 Speaker 26: with the. CAO. Through your warden,
01:50:10 Speaker 26: I'll start with the waste management
01:50:12 Speaker 26: study, and maybe I'll turn to
01:50:14 Speaker 26: Garrett and and Trevor to talk
01:50:15 Speaker 26: about the culverts on on the
01:50:16 Speaker 26: structures on Forty. With respect to
01:50:18 Speaker 26: the waste management study, there definitely
01:50:21 Speaker 26: will be consultation and and and
01:50:22 Speaker 26: sharing of information with with all
01:50:24 Speaker 26: member municipal councils. We are have
01:50:26 Speaker 26: been working with the waste manager,
01:50:28 Speaker 26: county practice, and and staff that
01:50:30 Speaker 26: are in each of the nine
01:50:31 Speaker 26: member municipalities. The consultant has been
01:50:38 Speaker 26: doing site visits to the various
01:50:42 Speaker 26: landfill sites, transfer stations, and collecting
01:50:46 Speaker 27: data and information. So the bulk
01:50:51 Speaker 27: of the work to date has
01:50:52 Speaker 27: been with staff engagement, but there
01:50:54 Speaker 27: will be definitely some overall community
01:50:56 Speaker 27: engagement as well as engagement with
01:50:59 Speaker 27: each of the member municipalities. We
01:51:00 Speaker 27: anticipate some of the early results
01:51:01 Speaker 27: will be maybe later this year,
01:51:05 Speaker 27: and then definitely into next year
01:51:07 Speaker 27: we'll be doing some of that
01:51:08 Speaker 27: consultation work. Okay, so I see
01:51:12 Speaker 27: Manager Ierton is coming up. Thank
01:51:13 Speaker 27: you, Warden. In regards to the,
01:51:17 Speaker 27: I guess there's two capital structures.
01:51:19 Speaker 27: One is actually under 40, and
01:51:21 Speaker 27: the other is Concession Two, which
01:51:24 Speaker 27: is in Chatsworth Township. Basically, the original budget figures were based on the consultant estimate that was put forward. I guess about the middle. of the summer, so last year, and then based on the interpretation after the bids came in, there were basically three bids all around 3.1 to 3.3 million, pretty competitive, and then three other bids that were significantly higher. But initially, the variation in the bid prices compared to what they determined in the estimates, a lot of it has come down to the temporary flow system. that's used for bypassing the river through the structure during construction. The engineers originally assumed that the shoring that was used could be sacrificed, or sorry, could be reused after the construction. So basically, they pay for the steel, pile the sheet, or put the sheet piles in, and then pull them back out and reuse them on other projects. However, in talking to the different contractors, they determined that it wasn't. They basically the sheet piling would be sacrificial, so. Official, so basically they put it in, and then they can never use it again. So the costs of that were one of the factors that drove that price up. Also, the cost of the fabrication of the precast structures was higher than they expected, and that's largely to to changes in the steel pricing since the time of the estimate compared to when the bids were placed. Yeah, hopefully that answers that question. Okay, follow up. or no? Okay, any further questions then or comments? Okay, in that case then I'll call the question. All those in favor, and that motion is carried. Thank you. Okay, so with that then we will move on to finish off the agenda. We do not have any closed mini matters, other business. Seeing no hands raised, we will go to notices of motion. Are there any notices of motion to serve today? Okay, seeing no hands, then we'll look for a motion to adjourn. Thank you. Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded by Councillor Carleton. All those in favor? And this meeting is adjourned. Thank you very much, everyone.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.