Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — July 23, 2026
Hook: Healthcare Connect Waitlist Cleared By Spring
Grey County · Committee of the Whole · July 23, 2026
Summary
Grey County’s Committee of the Whole reviewed primary-care access, paramedic-base financing, provincial planning rules, road safety, special-needs funding, and a site-specific agricultural land-use request. The meeting also included a separately announced Green Development Program staffing decision.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Infrastructure Funding Cap Limits Local Healthcare Expansion: The Ontario Health Team addresses infrastructure funding constraints, noting a 100000 dollar cap that prevents primary care organizations from applying for necessary local improvements in areas like Southgate.
- Funding Allocation Constraints by Postal Code: Lindsay Johnston explains that initial funding rounds were restricted to specific postal codes like N0H, requiring organizations to submit proposals based on unattached patient data within their large service areas.
- Loan Application Consolidation for Durham and Feversham Paramedic Bases: Council authorized staff to apply for a loan with Infrastructure Ontario and bring back a bylaw to finance two paramedic bases in Durham and Feversham, consolidating applications to reduce administrative burden.
- Financing Paramedic Bases Via External Borrowing with Grant Offsets Sim Salata Explained: Sim Salata explained that borrowing at a standard rate allows the province to return grants, resulting in a net cost for financing paramedic service bases externally rather than using internal interest which is ineligible under Infrastructure Ontario rules. Although Gray County has an annual debt repayment limit calculated via FIR filings as a specific high figure, Tara Warder noted that the county's own threshold restricts repayments to ten percent of own-source revenues, capping available funds at a lower amount.
- Permanent Role Adopted for Green Development Program: Council approved a permanent position for the Green Development Program coordinator instead of a short-term contract, enabling better recruitment and offsetting budget costs against Natural Resources Canada grants to reduce projected expenses in 2027.
- CSR-CW-17-26 Award of Special Needs Resourcing: Councilor Eccles moved support for the Special Needs Resourcing Program award of $1.4 million in operational funding. This provincial funding is designed to stabilize and increase activities without impacting the existing budget.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- Committee of the Whole
- Date
- July 23, 2026
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Chair Paul McQueen called the July 23, 2026 meeting to order and confirmed no declared interests.
00:26:48 Speaker 01: call to order this committee. The
00:26:50 Speaker 01: whole meeting of July twenty third,
00:26:52 Speaker 01: twenty twenty six. At this point
00:26:53 Speaker 01: in time, I'll put out a
00:26:56 Speaker 01: call. Are there any declarations of
00:26:58 Speaker 01: interest? See no hands raised. Business
3 Business Arising from Minutes
No motions were raised regarding the minutes.
00:26:59 Speaker 01: arising for minutes. See no hands.
00:27:00 Speaker 01: We will move on to the
4.a The Grey Bruce Ontario Health Team - Lindsay Johnston, Executive Director
Executive Director Lindsay Johnston presented an update on the Grey Bruce Ontario Health Team's evolution toward hyper-local needs through collaborative agreements with primary care providers. A significant achievement involves clearing the Healthcare Connect waitlist for over 5,400 residents by spring 2026 via Interprofessional Care Team expansion proposals that fund salaried health human resources. However, infrastructure funding constraints currently limit local improvements due to a $100,000 cap preventing organizations from addressing needs in areas like Southgate.
00:27:02 Speaker 01: delegation. We have one delegation this
00:27:02 Speaker 01: morning. I would like to welcome
00:27:04 Speaker 01: Executive Director Lindsey Johnson. She will
00:27:13 Speaker 01: be providing us with this regular
00:27:15 Speaker 01: update. We look forward to it.
00:27:16 Speaker 01: Please come on up to the
00:27:18 Speaker 01: lectern, and I think they've they've
00:27:19 Speaker 01: given you the go-to on how
00:27:21 Speaker 01: to get that that microphone going.
00:27:23 Speaker 01: And what we'll do is, well,
00:27:24 Speaker 01: it'll either have to be your
00:27:26 Speaker 01: microphone or mine, back and forth,
00:27:28 Speaker 01: so that I can receive questions
00:27:32 Speaker 01: for you at the end of
00:27:35 Speaker 14: your presentation. So welcome. We're glad
00:27:38 Speaker 14: you're here. Thank you so much,
00:27:41 Speaker 14: Warden. So good morning, everyone, and
00:27:44 Speaker 14: thank you so much for having
00:27:48 Speaker 14: me here today to speak with
00:27:53 Speaker 14: you. I think I've had the
00:27:56 Speaker 14: opportunity to speak to many of
00:27:57 Speaker 14: you over the past couple years
00:28:00 Speaker 14: as I've been in the role
00:28:02 Speaker 14: of Executive Director of the Grey
00:28:04 Speaker 14: Bruce Ontario Health Team. I'm
00:28:09 Speaker 14: here to provide a brief update
00:28:12 Speaker 14: on some of the the work.
00:28:15 Speaker 14: that we've been doing over the
00:28:18 Speaker 14: past year, and part of this
00:28:21 Speaker 14: is the we've set up with
00:28:22 Speaker 14: the counties and the help of
00:28:28 Speaker 14: Randy and Christine in Bruce County
00:28:30 Speaker 14: a regular regular communication with the
00:28:31 Speaker 14: counties and municipalities over the course
00:28:35 Speaker 14: of the year. So I will
00:28:36 Speaker 14: aim to provide a delegation twice
00:28:39 Speaker 14: a year to both Gray County
00:28:41 Speaker 14: and Bruce. Years both Gray County
00:28:43 Speaker 14: and Bruce County, as well as
00:28:44 Speaker 14: provide continuous quarterly municipal updates, which
00:28:48 Speaker 14: I appreciate the spreading of those
00:28:51 Speaker 14: to your to your council members
00:28:54 Speaker 14: to provide more detailed updates about
00:28:57 Speaker 14: some of the progress and activities
00:28:58 Speaker 14: and initiatives of the Great Bruce
00:28:59 Speaker 14: OHD. So this this slide is
00:29:01 Speaker 14: not in your package, but it's
00:29:04 Speaker 14: one that I shared recently. at
00:29:08 Speaker 14: a a presentation to Bruce County,
00:29:12 Speaker 14: and I just wanted to share
00:29:13 Speaker 14: it as I give a bit
00:29:18 Speaker 14: of an introduction to to what
00:29:19 Speaker 14: OHTs are. And this is actually
00:29:22 Speaker 14: a diagram that one of my
00:29:24 Speaker 14: staff members put together of the
00:29:26 Speaker 14: Ontario healthcare system. And so, as
00:29:27 Speaker 14: you can see, extremely complex, many
00:29:29 Speaker 14: different levels, and over on I
00:29:33 Speaker 14: guess it's on the if you're
00:29:35 Speaker 14: looking at the screen, the right
00:29:38 Speaker 14: hand side. Looking at the screen,
00:29:40 Speaker 14: the right-hand side in the blue
00:29:44 Speaker 14: square—that's Ontario Health Teams. And so,
00:29:46 Speaker 14: Ontario Health Teams were actually started
00:29:48 Speaker 14: in, I think, it was 2019
00:29:50 Speaker 14: as the new way of organizing
00:29:51 Speaker 14: local healthcare. And the previous method
00:29:55 Speaker 14: of organizing healthcare, as many of
00:29:58 Speaker 14: you will probably remember, are the
00:30:01 Speaker 14: Linds. And there were, I think,
00:30:03 Speaker 14: there were maybe 11 Linds that
00:30:06 Speaker 14: kind of divided up the province
00:30:08 Speaker 14: of Ontario. and they were quite
00:30:12 Speaker 14: large. And the Grey Bruce was
00:30:17 Speaker 14: part of the Southwestland, which also
00:30:20 Speaker 14: included Elgin, Middlesex, London, Oxford. So
00:30:23 Speaker 14: a really large and very diverse
00:30:27 Speaker 14: area. And so the way that
00:30:30 Speaker 14: local healthcare and system level healthcare
00:30:32 Speaker 14: is being organized now is in
00:30:33 Speaker 14: the form of Ontario Health Teams,
00:30:35 Speaker 14: and there are actually fifty-eight Ontario
00:30:37 Speaker 14: Health Teams throughout Ontario at present,
00:30:39 Speaker 14: and they're with. And there, with
00:30:42 Speaker 14: these kind of a smaller focus
00:30:47 Speaker 14: on smaller regions, we're able to
00:30:50 Speaker 14: provide a more hyper-local look at
00:30:52 Speaker 14: the needs of a population of
00:30:55 Speaker 14: communities of the providers within a
00:30:57 Speaker 14: a smaller region, and really target
00:30:59 Speaker 14: initiatives and planning that will really
00:31:02 Speaker 14: help meet the needs locally as
00:31:04 Speaker 14: they as they shift and change
00:31:07 Speaker 14: as well. so the Gravers OHT
00:31:10 Speaker 14: has had an evolving structure over
00:31:13 Speaker 14: the past, at least the past
00:31:14 Speaker 14: three and a half years that
00:31:16 Speaker 14: I've been part of it, and
00:31:18 Speaker 14: most recently in this last fiscal
00:31:20 Speaker 14: year, we were able to really
00:31:22 Speaker 14: solidify our collaborative decision-making agreement and
00:31:25 Speaker 14: our our partnerships to form a
00:31:27 Speaker 14: structure that was able to leverage
00:31:32 Speaker 14: leadership from primary care providers, so.
00:31:33 Speaker 14: physicians and nurse practitioners, as well
00:31:35 Speaker 14: as health system leaders throughout all
00:31:37 Speaker 14: of Grey Bruce, so including primary
00:31:38 Speaker 14: care, acute care, mental health and
00:31:42 Speaker 14: addictions, and other levels of home
00:31:45 Speaker 14: and community care, and also involve
00:31:46 Speaker 14: community members, so patients, families, and
00:31:51 Speaker 14: caregivers, and kind of together, as
00:31:53 Speaker 14: you'll see in the center of
00:31:58 Speaker 14: the graphic, that makes up kind
00:32:01 Speaker 14: of the decision-making structure for the
00:32:05 Speaker 14: Grey Bruce Ontario Health team, and
00:32:06 Speaker 14: then we have even. larger networks
00:32:08 Speaker 14: of of partnerships, including those that
00:32:11 Speaker 14: we have with local counties and
00:32:13 Speaker 14: municipalities. So I know this looks
00:32:16 Speaker 14: a bit small on the slide,
00:32:19 Speaker 14: but hopefully you're able to to
00:32:22 Speaker 14: see it on your screen and
00:32:26 Speaker 14: in the slides that were shared.
00:32:30 Speaker 14: So our our strategic priorities are
00:32:32 Speaker 14: dictated by the province of Ontario,
00:32:33 Speaker 14: so the Ministry of Health and
00:32:35 Speaker 14: subsequently Ontario Health, and this. year,
00:32:39 Speaker 14: our strategic priorities focus on three
00:32:41 Speaker 14: different high-level priorities, which are primary
00:32:43 Speaker 14: care access and attachment, integrated clinical
00:32:45 Speaker 14: priorities, and OHT capacity building. And
00:32:48 Speaker 14: what I've done under each of
00:32:51 Speaker 14: these categories is list out the
00:32:54 Speaker 14: specific deliverables. What I really want
00:32:56 Speaker 14: to show by this graphic is
00:32:58 Speaker 14: the kind of the really strong
00:33:00 Speaker 14: attention that's being placed on. primary
00:33:02 Speaker 14: care access and attachment for OHTs,
00:33:06 Speaker 14: and the the focus of the
00:33:08 Speaker 14: province currently on this strategic priority.
00:33:12 Speaker 14: And what's listed in the in
00:33:13 Speaker 14: the small box is kind of
00:33:16 Speaker 14: at the bottom there. Those are
00:33:17 Speaker 14: our KPIs that are associated with
00:33:21 Speaker 14: each one of the strategic priorities.
00:33:24 Speaker 14: So those are the specific metrics
00:33:29 Speaker 14: that we are, as an Ontario
00:33:33 Speaker 14: Health team, being evaluated on. Valuated
00:33:37 Speaker 14: on, and we're being closely looked
00:33:39 Speaker 14: at by the province for us
00:33:45 Speaker 14: to to be successful. And you're
00:33:46 Speaker 14: no, you'll notice that attachment to
00:33:48 Speaker 14: a primary care provider is a
00:33:51 Speaker 14: key one there, as well as
00:33:53 Speaker 14: the drawdown of the Healthcare Connect
00:33:54 Speaker 14: waitlist. So focusing a bit more
00:33:56 Speaker 14: on those, the the primary care
00:33:58 Speaker 14: access and attachment, which is something
00:34:01 Speaker 14: that I know is of interest
00:34:04 Speaker 14: to all of you. plus many
00:34:06 Speaker 14: of those that that you serve,
00:34:08 Speaker 14: back in January 2025, the province
00:34:10 Speaker 14: made a commitment to attaching 100
00:34:13 Speaker 14: of Ontarians to primary care by
00:34:14 Speaker 14: 2029. Additionally, there was a a
00:34:16 Speaker 14: mandate to clear the Healthcare Connect
00:34:19 Speaker 14: waitlist, as it was January 1st,
00:34:21 Speaker 14: 2025, by spring 2026. which, as
00:34:22 Speaker 14: we all know, has passed. And
00:34:24 Speaker 14: and I will say that we
00:34:26 Speaker 14: were successful in doing that here
00:34:28 Speaker 14: in Gray Bruce. It took a
00:34:30 Speaker 14: lot of work by many of
00:34:32 Speaker 14: our partners and a lot of
00:34:34 Speaker 14: collaboration, but we were able to
00:34:39 Speaker 14: draw down from. It was just
00:34:41 Speaker 14: over 5,400 Gray Bruce residents on
00:34:44 Speaker 14: the healthcare connect list, and we
00:34:47 Speaker 14: were able to either attach them
00:34:51 Speaker 14: all to primary care locally, or
00:34:53 Speaker 14: if they had moved or had
00:34:57 Speaker 14: our Or if they had moved
00:35:00 Speaker 14: or had already been attached, clear
00:35:02 Speaker 14: them from that wait list,
00:35:04 Speaker 14: and we now have a list
00:35:08 Speaker 14: that you know is not like
00:35:11 Speaker 14: it used to be, where people
00:35:13 Speaker 14: would sign up and you know
00:35:16 Speaker 14: be waiting years to be attached.
00:35:19 Speaker 14: We are seeing kind of regular
00:35:22 Speaker 14: ebbs and flows and drawdown of
00:35:27 Speaker 14: that healthcare connect wait list as
00:35:31 Speaker 14: we attach more and more local
00:35:33 Speaker 14: residents to primary care. So I
00:35:36 Speaker 14: included this slide just so again
00:35:38 Speaker 14: you can see. the very strong
00:35:42 Speaker 14: focus. These are the the Ontario
00:35:45 Speaker 14: Health kind of KPIs and pillars
00:35:47 Speaker 14: of what they have really committed
00:35:51 Speaker 14: to do. And the mechanism for
00:35:53 Speaker 14: us locally to meet these specific
00:35:57 Speaker 14: KPIs and help the province achieve
00:36:00 Speaker 14: their goals is through an opportunity
00:36:04 Speaker 14: called Interprofessional Care Team (IPCT) expansion.
00:36:06 Speaker 14: So this is where Ontario. health
00:36:09 Speaker 14: teams and their associated primary care
00:36:12 Speaker 14: networks, which are the the network
00:36:15 Speaker 14: of local physicians and nurse practitioners
00:36:17 Speaker 14: that we have built relationships with,
00:36:24 Speaker 14: we're able to collaboratively put in
00:36:26 Speaker 14: proposals when their province to apply
00:36:27 Speaker 14: for funding to increase capacity and
00:36:30 Speaker 14: attachment to primary care, and so
00:36:35 Speaker 14: the way that this is structured
00:36:39 Speaker 14: is that. proposals can be put
00:36:40 Speaker 14: in for the expansion of current
00:36:44 Speaker 14: primary care organizations. So that includes
00:36:49 Speaker 14: family health teams and community health
00:36:51 Speaker 14: centers. And we're able to look
00:36:53 Speaker 14: at adding base funding for salaried
00:36:55 Speaker 14: health human resource positions to help
00:36:58 Speaker 14: increase capacity for the physicians to
00:36:59 Speaker 14: attach more patients. And this funding
00:37:02 Speaker 14: also helps us. increase the number
00:37:05 Speaker 14: of funded provincially funded positions for
00:37:06 Speaker 14: nurse practitioners, which are also able
00:37:08 Speaker 14: to increase capacity for attachment of
00:37:11 Speaker 14: the physicians, but also attach patients
00:37:14 Speaker 14: themselves. This is a slide that
00:37:16 Speaker 14: shows progress as of the end
00:37:18 Speaker 14: of February. I'm happy to report
00:37:20 Speaker 14: that I have very, very up-to-date
00:37:23 Speaker 14: data as of. Up to date
00:37:24 Speaker 14: data as of this morning. That
00:37:27 Speaker 14: this number actually. Let me get
00:37:28 Speaker 14: this here. So we actually have
00:37:30 Speaker 14: now attached over nine thousand local
00:37:33 Speaker 14: residents to primary care, so a
00:37:35 Speaker 14: physician or nurse practitioner, and we
00:37:39 Speaker 14: are now forty percent of the
00:37:42 Speaker 14: way there to our larger goal
00:37:48 Speaker 14: of attaching over twenty three and
00:37:51 Speaker 14: a half thousand Gray Bruce residents
00:37:53 Speaker 14: to primary care. That metric was.
00:37:56 Speaker 14: the metric the twenty three thousand
00:38:00 Speaker 14: five hundred and sixty two the
00:38:03 Speaker 14: metric that we were given January
00:38:05 Speaker 14: first twenty twenty five of how
00:38:07 Speaker 14: many unattached patients there were within
00:38:10 Speaker 14: our region, and so it's what
00:38:14 Speaker 14: we built a master plan a
00:38:18 Speaker 14: master attachment plan based off of,
00:38:20 Speaker 14: and when we did this last
00:38:22 Speaker 14: year with all of our partners
00:38:24 Speaker 14: it was estimated that we would
00:38:26 Speaker 14: require an additional eleven million dollars
00:38:28 Speaker 14: of base funding annually from the
00:38:30 Speaker 14: province, in. order to have enough
00:38:32 Speaker 14: capacity locally to have everyone attached
00:38:36 Speaker 14: to a physician or NP close
00:38:38 Speaker 14: to home, we have received as
00:38:41 Speaker 14: of this this April, so
00:38:43 Speaker 14: April twenty twenty six confirmation that
00:38:44 Speaker 14: we have as a region an
00:38:48 Speaker 14: additional seven million dollars of base
00:38:49 Speaker 14: funding locally, and our target for
00:38:52 Speaker 14: this year. specifically, is to attach
00:38:54 Speaker 14: an additional 9,000 Grey Bruce residents
00:38:56 Speaker 14: to primary care, and as of
00:38:58 Speaker 14: this morning, since April 1st, 2026,
00:39:00 Speaker 14: we've already attached almost 1,700 individuals
00:39:02 Speaker 14: to primary care. So we're 20%
00:39:05 Speaker 14: of the way towards that goal,
00:39:08 Speaker 14: and that goal, the target for
00:39:09 Speaker 14: that goal, has now been pushed
00:39:15 Speaker 14: a little bit to the end
00:39:16 Speaker 14: of June 2027, since the actual
00:39:18 Speaker 14: funds have not flowed yet. so
00:39:21 Speaker 14: we've been able to attach 1,700
00:39:23 Speaker 14: people already without actually that additional
00:39:25 Speaker 14: funding. Just with the
00:39:27 Speaker 14: promise of that funding coming,
00:39:30 Speaker 14: we are also anticipating two additional
00:39:33 Speaker 14: opportunities to apply for more funding
00:39:36 Speaker 14: for our region. We had estimated
00:39:38 Speaker 14: again that we probably need at
00:39:40 Speaker 14: least an additional four million dollars
00:39:41 Speaker 14: to attach everyone to primary care.
00:39:45 Speaker 14: That will likely shift with kind
00:39:46 Speaker 14: of population changes and as we
00:39:49 Speaker 14: engage partners. to understand a little
00:39:52 Speaker 14: bit better the specific needs of
00:39:55 Speaker 14: the individuals that remain unattached
00:39:58 Speaker 14: to primary care, but we do
00:40:02 Speaker 14: anticipate that there will be two
00:40:05 Speaker 14: more calls for proposals before 2029.
00:40:07 Speaker 14: That's all I have for you
00:40:09 Speaker 14: right now, based on on my
00:40:10 Speaker 01: slides and the time I was
00:40:12 Speaker 01: allotted. I I do want to
00:40:13 Speaker 01: say that I've had the opportunity
00:40:14 Speaker 01: to give quite a few presentations
00:40:17 Speaker 01: recently to. different municipalities and different
00:40:18 Speaker 01: groups from municipalities on primary care
00:40:22 Speaker 01: specifically, I have developed a very
00:40:23 Speaker 01: comprehensive primary care presentation that gets
00:40:25 Speaker 01: into a lot of the complexity
00:40:26 Speaker 01: of it, which I do think
00:40:29 Speaker 01: is very important for decision makers
00:40:31 Speaker 01: to understand. So, I would be
00:40:34 Speaker 01: more than happy to again speak
00:40:35 Speaker 01: to your council separately or answer
00:40:37 Speaker 01: any specific questions on the OHT
00:40:39 Speaker 01: on. primary care specifically, or upcoming
00:40:42 Speaker 01: funding opportunities. So, thank you. Thank
00:40:44 Speaker 01: you, Executive Director Johnson. It is
00:40:46 Speaker 01: very helpful, and we appreciate the
00:40:50 Speaker 01: fact that you've been able to
00:40:53 Speaker 01: distill it into something that that
00:40:55 Speaker 15: people can first of all have
00:40:59 Speaker 15: a look at, and then ask
00:41:01 Speaker 15: if they want to dig deeper.
00:41:03 Speaker 15: That's very helpful, and and certainly
00:41:04 Speaker 15: walking us through that first slide
00:41:06 Speaker 15: that you showed is is complex
00:41:09 Speaker 15: as things have been changing, and
00:41:12 Speaker 15: you are ever so. nimble to
00:41:13 Speaker 15: be able to adapt to the
00:41:15 Speaker 15: the new approaches, the new organization,
00:41:17 Speaker 15: and those are indeed some good
00:41:19 Speaker 15: celebratory numbers about attaching people to
00:41:21 Speaker 15: doctors where we need them here
00:41:24 Speaker 15: in the county. So, with that,
00:41:27 Speaker 15: we will go to questions. So,
00:41:29 Speaker 15: we'll start with the deputy warden.
00:41:32 Speaker 15: Thank you, Lindsay, for the the
00:41:34 Speaker 15: work that you do. It's important
00:41:37 Speaker 15: for all of the residents in
00:41:39 Speaker 15: Graveroos. Before I ask my question.
00:41:40 Speaker 15: I can't help but observe the
00:41:44 Speaker 15: irony of the present provincial government
00:41:46 Speaker 15: increasing the number of Ontario
00:41:47 Speaker 15: health teams from the number of
00:41:50 Speaker 15: limbs, and at the same time
00:41:51 Speaker 15: shrinking the number of conservation authorities.
00:42:00 Speaker 15: It's kind of ironic, nonetheless. Whatever,
00:42:02 Speaker 14: maybe they'll make their mind up
00:42:06 Speaker 14: eventually. What I'm what I'm curious
00:42:07 Speaker 14: to know is, given the tremendous
00:42:10 Speaker 14: growth in various parts of the
00:42:11 Speaker 14: of the county, and I'm thinking
00:42:14 Speaker 14: specifically of of Southgate and Dundalk
00:42:18 Speaker 14: in particular. where are the real
00:42:21 Speaker 14: pinch points in providing more
00:42:25 Speaker 14: healthcare to people? Is it physicians?
00:42:28 Speaker 14: Is it NPs? Is it physical
00:42:30 Speaker 14: space to look after the customers?
00:42:32 Speaker 14: Where are the pinch points, and
00:42:35 Speaker 14: how do we get how do
00:42:39 Speaker 14: we get a positive response from
00:42:41 Speaker 14: the Ministry of Health to the
00:42:42 Speaker 14: various suggestions that you know? I'm
00:42:44 Speaker 14: thinking of Southgate again. We've made
00:42:46 Speaker 14: different approaches to the provincial government,
00:42:50 Speaker 14: and we're getting zero. buy-in to
00:42:54 Speaker 14: this point. Where do we go
00:42:55 Speaker 14: from here? Please. Okay. Thank you
00:42:57 Speaker 14: very much for your for your
00:43:00 Speaker 14: question. And I think that all
00:43:02 Speaker 14: of the things that you mentioned
00:43:04 Speaker 14: are pinch points. So sorry that
00:43:05 Speaker 14: I'm not doing a great job
00:43:06 Speaker 14: answering that, but definitely the HHR.
00:43:09 Speaker 14: But I will say that. the
00:43:13 Speaker 14: anticipated constraints of having these additional
00:43:15 Speaker 14: positions funded and finding providers to
00:43:18 Speaker 14: fill them isn't as great as
00:43:22 Speaker 14: we anticipated. With a lot of
00:43:24 Speaker 14: the work that's been done throughout
00:43:28 Speaker 14: the province in increasing NP positions
00:43:32 Speaker 14: in different academic facilities, as well
00:43:34 Speaker 14: as even locally at Georgian, all
00:43:35 Speaker 14: the work that they've been doing
00:43:38 Speaker 14: to increase the number of like
00:43:41 Speaker 14: RN and RPN and MOA graduates,
00:43:43 Speaker 14: we're actually finding that the positions
00:43:48 Speaker 14: are being filled. In some areas,
00:43:50 Speaker 14: it takes more time, but we
00:43:52 Speaker 14: are able to find those individuals.
00:43:54 Speaker 14: Infrastructure is and continues to be
00:43:57 Speaker 14: likely the biggest constraint that we
00:44:00 Speaker 14: have. And I did have it
00:44:01 Speaker 14: in my slide, and I didn't
00:44:02 Speaker 14: actually talk to it, but the
00:44:04 Speaker 14: funding cap for one-time funding for
00:44:08 Speaker 14: any of these proposals is one
00:44:10 Speaker 14: hundred. Proposals is a hundred thousand
00:44:13 Speaker 14: dollars, so there is no opportunity
00:44:17 Speaker 14: as like as an OHT or
00:44:20 Speaker 14: as like primary care organizations to
00:44:21 Speaker 14: actually apply for any infrastructure funding,
00:44:24 Speaker 14: and so we have consistently asked
00:44:25 Speaker 14: the province like what what do
00:44:28 Speaker 14: you expect us to do then
00:44:29 Speaker 14: essentially, and there has been no
00:44:31 Speaker 14: answer to date unfortunately, and I
00:44:32 Speaker 14: think to your question about how
00:44:33 Speaker 14: to actually get some movement from
00:44:35 Speaker 14: the province in terms of you
00:44:36 Speaker 14: know infrastructure funding, and I know
00:44:39 Speaker 14: specifically the the issue in Southgate,
00:44:41 Speaker 14: I actually think it's it's alignment,
00:44:42 Speaker 14: and you know alignment on the
00:44:45 Speaker 14: understanding of you know where they're
00:44:48 Speaker 14: going and what they're trying to
00:44:51 Speaker 14: do, and then aligning the ask
00:44:54 Speaker 14: with that. And so, you know,
00:44:55 Speaker 14: to to just kind of summarize
00:44:58 Speaker 14: it to some degree in Southgate.
00:45:02 Speaker 14: if that infrastructure like is not
00:45:07 Speaker 14: there, like the services cannot be
00:45:09 Speaker 14: provided locally and close to home,
00:45:12 Speaker 14: so those unattached residents cannot be
00:45:14 Speaker 14: served close to home, which is
00:45:16 Speaker 16: what the commitment has been from
00:45:19 Speaker 16: the province. And so I think
00:45:24 Speaker 16: you know again, and I'm not
00:45:26 Speaker 16: super, I'm not exactly sure how
00:45:28 Speaker 16: to do it, but I think
00:45:31 Speaker 16: there's you know enough people to
00:45:34 Speaker 16: come together to figure it out.
00:45:38 Speaker 16: But I think it is you
00:45:40 Speaker 16: know you know collaborate. You know,
00:45:46 Speaker 16: collaborating like if there's a way
00:45:47 Speaker 16: for us to collaborate with you
00:45:50 Speaker 16: know counties, municipalities, the primary care
00:45:52 Speaker 16: leaders, and all align on you
00:45:55 Speaker 16: know the advocacy, I think that
00:45:56 Speaker 16: is the best approach, and hopefully
00:46:01 Speaker 16: one that will be effective.
00:46:05 Speaker 16: But truly, the mandate cannot be
00:46:07 Speaker 16: achieved if there's not that infrastructure
00:46:10 Speaker 16: to support it. Thank you. We'll
00:46:14 Speaker 16: go to Councillor Dobrin. Thank you.
00:46:16 Speaker 16: We'll go to Councillor Dobrine and
00:46:17 Speaker 16: then to Councillor Keen. Thank you.
00:46:20 Speaker 16: Good morning. Thank you, Warden, and
00:46:23 Speaker 16: through you, thank you, Deputy Warden,
00:46:25 Speaker 16: for the questions specifically about pinch
00:46:27 Speaker 16: points. There, we're hoping that we
00:46:31 Speaker 16: will have a delegation at AMO
00:46:33 Speaker 16: in August. We love for you
00:46:37 Speaker 16: to join us, but in the
00:46:40 Speaker 16: meantime, what I am hearing from
00:46:42 Speaker 16: residents, not specifically. to Southgate, but
00:46:45 Speaker 16: but residents is that they're still
00:46:47 Speaker 16: concerned about registering, I, because they
00:46:54 Speaker 16: don't want to take the risk
00:46:55 Speaker 16: of losing the physician, the primary
00:46:58 Speaker 16: care team that they have in
00:47:00 Speaker 14: place, and they're commuting hour and
00:47:03 Speaker 14: a half, two hours when they're
00:47:06 Speaker 14: unwell, and so the numbers while
00:47:08 Speaker 14: are great achievements. Congratulations, great work.
00:47:10 Speaker 14: but I don't think that they're
00:47:11 Speaker 14: reflective of our community's need or
00:47:13 Speaker 14: the lack of attachment. So, how
00:47:16 Speaker 14: do we? Perhaps we would love
00:47:18 Speaker 14: for you to come to our
00:47:20 Speaker 14: local council to share that. Perhaps
00:47:22 Speaker 14: we can elevate that the need.
00:47:24 Speaker 14: We have said on numerous occasions
00:47:26 Speaker 14: that you will not be detached
00:47:28 Speaker 14: from your primary healthcare provider if
00:47:31 Speaker 14: you register, and the importance. of
00:47:33 Speaker 14: registering. I'm just wondering how we
00:47:37 Speaker 14: can communicate that so that people
00:47:39 Speaker 14: actually do register. Because I think
00:47:41 Speaker 14: the number is significant. The number
00:47:43 Speaker 14: that you're working toward is not
00:47:46 Speaker 14: reflective of reality. Yeah, thank you.
00:47:48 Speaker 14: Thank you so much for that.
00:47:51 Speaker 14: And it was interesting. We were
00:47:53 Speaker 14: actually going through Healthcare Connect registration
00:47:55 Speaker 14: numbers today and noting. that
00:47:58 Speaker 14: Southgate was very low in registrants,
00:48:01 Speaker 14: and we were like just brainstorming
00:48:04 Speaker 14: how we could actually do that.
00:48:06 Speaker 14: And there is a lot of
00:48:09 Speaker 14: mistrust for the healthcare Connect system
00:48:10 Speaker 14: because, like, because of the history.
00:48:13 Speaker 14: And you know, people had been
00:48:16 Speaker 14: on it for years. Don't think
00:48:21 Speaker 14: that it works very well. And
00:48:23 Speaker 14: yeah, up until I think last
00:48:26 Speaker 14: fall, you would be de rostered
00:48:28 Speaker 14: from your provider if you and
00:48:29 Speaker 14: and you know, people really like
00:48:31 Speaker 14: that. Really like that's not something
00:48:33 Speaker 14: that anybody wants to do. So
00:48:34 Speaker 14: I I think that you know
00:48:36 Speaker 14: I would welcome the opportunity to
00:48:38 Speaker 14: come and speak to people. I
00:48:39 Speaker 14: think also leveraging the CHC and
00:48:41 Speaker 14: its trust in the community. I
00:48:44 Speaker 14: know there's a lot of individuals,
00:48:45 Speaker 14: especially in Southgate, that are accessing
00:48:48 Speaker 14: CHC services, but they may be
00:48:51 Speaker 14: attached to primary care elsewhere. So
00:48:56 Speaker 14: perhaps leveraging the relationships like with
00:48:57 Speaker 14: a trusted organization, and with this
00:48:59 Speaker 14: new funding, the CHC actually will
00:49:01 Speaker 14: be rostering a significant number of
00:49:03 Speaker 01: people in addition to what they
00:49:05 Speaker 01: have right now. So perhaps just
00:49:08 Speaker 01: seeing that will entice some other
00:49:10 Speaker 01: people to to register. That just
00:49:12 Speaker 01: hasn't the movement hasn't been there
00:49:14 Speaker 01: yet because the funding hasn't flowed
00:49:15 Speaker 01: for this year. So I think
00:49:17 Speaker 01: yeah, any you know anything that
00:49:18 Speaker 11: So anything that we can do
00:49:20 Speaker 11: to help kind of build not
00:49:21 Speaker 11: only the trust in healthcare connected
00:49:22 Speaker 11: itself, but in like the system
00:49:23 Speaker 11: and where it's going, and perhaps
00:49:27 Speaker 11: it is sharing some of these
00:49:28 Speaker 11: things, right? To of you know
00:49:29 Speaker 11: the drawdown we've been able to
00:49:31 Speaker 11: achieve, the increased attachment, and that
00:49:33 Speaker 11: confidence that you know people aren't
00:49:36 Speaker 11: going to be left without a
00:49:39 Speaker 11: provider if they do get on
00:49:42 Speaker 11: the the healthcare connect system. Okay,
00:49:45 Speaker 11: thank you. And anything that we
00:49:47 Speaker 11: can do. to help with that
00:49:49 Speaker 11: education to get that message out
00:49:53 Speaker 11: because it is a fairly recent
00:49:55 Speaker 11: change, given as you mentioned the
00:49:57 Speaker 11: history, so that people need to
00:49:59 Speaker 11: trust the new rules. So, okay,
00:50:01 Speaker 11: we're going to go to Councillor
00:50:04 Speaker 11: Keaveny next. Thank you, Madam Warden,
00:50:06 Speaker 11: and Lindsay. I really appreciate you
00:50:08 Speaker 11: being here today, and would extend
00:50:10 Speaker 11: an invitation to you to come
00:50:12 Speaker 11: to speak to me for it
00:50:17 Speaker 14: as well. I just wanted to
00:50:20 Speaker 14: share that we have one new
00:50:23 Speaker 14: doctor in Meaford and two more
00:50:25 Speaker 14: coming. So, thank you for your
00:50:26 Speaker 14: participating. participation in that, and I
00:50:29 Speaker 14: just wanted to ask to pick
00:50:31 Speaker 14: your brain a little bit in
00:50:34 Speaker 14: terms of advice for municipalities, because
00:50:39 Speaker 14: I think through your response to
00:50:41 Speaker 14: Deputy Warden Mill, I'm hearing that
00:50:44 Speaker 14: infrastructure office space for doctors is
00:50:46 Speaker 14: is a key concern. So perhaps
00:50:49 Speaker 14: if municipalities gave thought to moving
00:50:51 Speaker 14: away from the Hunger Games of
00:50:53 Speaker 14: doctor incentives and focused more on
00:50:56 Speaker 14: providing space for new potential doctors.
00:50:59 Speaker 14: would. Would that be your recommendation
00:51:02 Speaker 14: as the key thing that municipalities
00:51:03 Speaker 14: could do? I mean, in Mefford,
00:51:06 Speaker 14: we now offer one hundred thousand
00:51:09 Speaker 14: dollars at one percent interest loan
00:51:10 Speaker 14: from the municipality to support doctors
00:51:15 Speaker 14: with space. But just wanted to,
00:51:16 Speaker 14: as I say, get your thoughts
00:51:17 Speaker 14: on other areas of advice for
00:51:19 Speaker 14: municipalities to participate. Thank you very
00:51:20 Speaker 14: much. Yes, I think that that
00:51:24 Speaker 14: is it. I. I do um
00:51:29 Speaker 14: yeah I think it's great to
00:51:31 Speaker 14: kind of look at that and
00:51:33 Speaker 14: reevaluate based on the new context
00:51:34 Speaker 14: where we are now and and
00:51:38 Speaker 14: shifting away potentially from, um, you
00:51:40 Speaker 14: know some of the um
00:51:43 Speaker 14: recruitment um focus and towards kind
00:51:45 Speaker 14: of the areas where um the
00:51:46 Speaker 14: system that the system can't support
00:51:47 Speaker 14: right now which is the infrastructure
00:51:50 Speaker 14: um I know with um something
00:51:55 Speaker 14: that is. we recently did some
00:51:58 Speaker 14: work with the South Bruce Peninsula,
00:52:01 Speaker 14: and this this new funding for
00:52:02 Speaker 14: every new position that is funding,
00:52:06 Speaker 14: it does also fund twenty five
00:52:09 Speaker 14: percent in terms of offer operational
00:52:12 Speaker 14: costs. So you know municipalities, if
00:52:14 Speaker 14: they're in a position that they
00:52:15 Speaker 14: may be able to kind of
00:52:18 Speaker 14: support the kind of, and again,
00:52:21 Speaker 14: I'm probably not going to say
00:52:23 Speaker 14: this right, but the leasing of
00:52:27 Speaker 14: a space or you know, they
00:52:30 Speaker 14: have a space to provide those
00:52:32 Speaker 14: operational funds. Are kind of committed
00:52:35 Speaker 14: to that, like the rent or
00:52:37 Speaker 14: whatever that is. So, if a
00:52:39 Speaker 14: town owns the building and they're
00:52:41 Speaker 14: renting it to a primary care
00:52:46 Speaker 14: organization, you know, there's that kind
00:52:52 Speaker 14: of commitment that with those additional
00:52:56 Speaker 14: positions, that operational funding comes along.
00:52:58 Speaker 08: So, we were able to do
00:53:00 Speaker 08: a bit of a business case,
00:53:02 Speaker 08: like with the South Bruce. Peninsula,
00:53:04 Speaker 08: to help the the physicians there,
00:53:06 Speaker 08: kind of get the support for
00:53:07 Speaker 08: moving into a new space. With
00:53:09 Speaker 08: them knowing that there was this
00:53:13 Speaker 08: confirmed, like there would be kind
00:53:14 Speaker 08: of confirmed funding to support the
00:53:15 Speaker 08: the rent of the additional space.
00:53:17 Speaker 08: So I think, like, kind of
00:53:19 Speaker 08: if there is opportunity to look
00:53:21 Speaker 08: at, you know, spaces that the
00:53:23 Speaker 08: municipalities may own or potential to
00:53:24 Speaker 08: support, like new spaces or leasehold
00:53:28 Speaker 08: improvements. I think that's a great
00:53:29 Speaker 08: opportunity to to explore. And again,
00:53:31 Speaker 08: it it likely will be. You
00:53:34 Speaker 08: know things will take time to
00:53:35 Speaker 08: to shift and change, but just
00:53:37 Speaker 08: being kind of open to understanding
00:53:40 Speaker 08: what this new kind of funding
00:53:43 Speaker 08: and these new structures look like,
00:53:44 Speaker 08: and how that potentially changes needs.
00:53:46 Speaker 08: for for primary care. Okay, thank
00:53:49 Speaker 08: you. We'll go to Councillor Greg.
00:53:51 Speaker 08: Thank you for the presentation this
00:53:53 Speaker 08: afternoon, Lindsay. And thanks, probably, for
00:53:54 Speaker 08: not including that complex or that
00:53:58 Speaker 08: slide that shows the complexities of
00:54:00 Speaker 08: navigating the Ministry of Health. The
00:54:03 Speaker 08: flip side of that is, I
00:54:05 Speaker 08: do have a couple questions, just
00:54:07 Speaker 08: for a little bit more framing
00:54:08 Speaker 08: around the the value. The the
00:54:11 Speaker 08: values that are in place right
00:54:13 Speaker 08: now, like to say seven million
00:54:16 Speaker 08: dollars in base funding increase since
00:54:18 Speaker 08: August twenty twenty five. What's that
00:54:20 Speaker 08: up against? Like, what what does
00:54:22 Speaker 08: seven million dollars increase in base
00:54:25 Speaker 08: funding mean? I I have no
00:54:33 Speaker 08: idea what your your starting point
00:54:36 Speaker 08: was. Because I was going to
00:54:38 Speaker 08: ask the question like, how much
00:54:40 Speaker 08: funding did each FHT get? Is
00:54:42 Speaker 08: that something you know, or is
00:54:44 Speaker 08: that some are details like that
00:54:46 Speaker 08: that you can report in an
00:54:49 Speaker 08: email back to council just because.
00:54:52 Speaker 08: I'm, yes, we're representing the county,
00:54:53 Speaker 08: but I'm most familiar with Owen
00:54:55 Speaker 08: Sounds Family Health Teams, and I
00:54:57 Speaker 08: can't help but wonder how many
00:54:58 Speaker 08: people were actually connected with a
00:55:01 Speaker 08: doctor at each FHT. Like, is
00:55:04 Speaker 08: there a resource where we can
00:55:08 Speaker 08: locate that information? The third question
00:55:10 Speaker 08: I would ask is: You mentioned
00:55:12 Speaker 08: over nine thousand attached to primary
00:55:14 Speaker 08: care, which was up from about
00:55:16 Speaker 08: seventy-three hundred in the one slide,
00:55:18 Speaker 08: and that was as of this
00:55:19 Speaker 08: morning. seventeen hundred as of April
00:55:21 Speaker 08: was a number you utilized. Is
00:55:23 Speaker 08: that the same number? That seventeen
00:55:24 Speaker 08: hundred increase as of April is
00:55:28 Speaker 08: that what drove it up to
00:55:29 Speaker 14: nine thousand? As of that information
00:55:32 Speaker 14: this morning, okay. I just when
00:55:34 Speaker 14: a doctor may retire, individuals that
00:55:36 Speaker 14: may be at risk of being
00:55:38 Speaker 14: de-registered or or needing to find
00:55:39 Speaker 14: another physician, they're not counted twice,
00:55:41 Speaker 14: are they? Like, just if you
00:55:43 Speaker 14: could explain in terms of that
00:55:46 Speaker 14: process to me, and and I'm
00:55:48 Speaker 14: glad for Councillor Millen's question or
00:55:52 Speaker 14: Councillor Debrine's question. I, I'm concerned
00:55:54 Speaker 14: that there is a lot of
00:55:56 Speaker 14: gap out there because I think
00:55:57 Speaker 14: the old list or a new
00:56:02 Speaker 14: list was started in January of
00:56:04 Speaker 14: 25, and you as you commented,
00:56:05 Speaker 14: changes were made last fall, and
00:56:06 Speaker 14: your And you're working with a
00:56:08 Speaker 14: list that's somewhat dated and more
00:56:10 Speaker 14: reflective of people that were hesitant
00:56:15 Speaker 14: to to put their name forward
00:56:16 Speaker 14: at the risk of losing their
00:56:18 Speaker 14: their primary care provider at the
00:56:25 Speaker 14: time. So, a couple questions that
00:56:28 Speaker 14: if you're able to guide me
00:56:30 Speaker 14: to where I can find those
00:56:32 Speaker 14: resources, or perhaps further them back
00:56:35 Speaker 14: to counsel in the future. Thanks.
00:56:41 Speaker 14: Yeah, for sure. I'll do my
00:56:45 Speaker 14: best to answer as much of
00:56:49 Speaker 14: that as I can. I also
00:56:51 Speaker 14: when I when I do that
00:56:52 Speaker 14: more in depth presentation that I've
00:56:56 Speaker 14: developed, a lot of that is
00:56:58 Speaker 14: answered, and I think, you know,
00:57:01 Speaker 14: as you noted at the very
00:57:04 Speaker 14: beginning, that like this system is
00:57:08 Speaker 14: probably the most complex I've ever
00:57:14 Speaker 14: encountered in systems, and it is
00:57:15 Speaker 14: not logical and it's not straightforward,
00:57:17 Speaker 14: and so it makes answering a
00:57:21 Speaker 14: lot of these questions and understanding
00:57:24 Speaker 14: it all like very difficult. But
00:57:28 Speaker 14: in terms of just going back.
00:57:33 Speaker 14: to, and I'm going to try
00:57:35 Speaker 14: to remember this properly, the first
00:57:40 Speaker 14: that you asked about the amount
00:57:43 Speaker 14: of funding and the attachments at
00:57:46 Speaker 14: each organization. So, the first round
00:57:49 Speaker 14: of funding was a bit different.
00:57:50 Speaker 14: There were regions because of the
00:57:52 Speaker 14: way that they structured it that
00:57:56 Speaker 14: were eligible to apply for funding.
00:57:57 Speaker 14: The first round was specific to
00:57:58 Speaker 14: postal codes, so the N0H and
00:57:59 Speaker 14: N. The N zero H and
00:58:00 Speaker 14: N zero G postal code were
00:58:01 Speaker 14: eligible to submit proposals, and other
00:58:03 Speaker 14: regions were not eligible. And we
00:58:05 Speaker 14: had immense difficulty here because, unlike
00:58:07 Speaker 14: many urban centers, we have huge
00:58:12 Speaker 14: FSA's. Like N zero H is
00:58:13 Speaker 14: the peninsula; it's part of the
00:58:14 Speaker 14: Blue Mountains. It's like you know,
00:58:16 Speaker 14: it's a huge Soggy Shores, and
00:58:17 Speaker 14: Slogging shores, and so we put
00:58:21 Speaker 14: together proposals for that, and the
00:58:25 Speaker 14: funding, like the asks, were constructed
00:58:27 Speaker 14: by, like they were based on
00:58:32 Speaker 14: data, so data that showed us
00:58:39 Speaker 14: how many unattached patients there were,
00:58:41 Speaker 14: and also what the organizations themselves,
00:58:43 Speaker 14: so the the family health teams,
00:58:45 Speaker 14: what they saw as feasible, within
00:58:47 Speaker 14: a year to recruit in terms
00:58:51 Speaker 14: of like the staffing and also
00:58:55 Speaker 14: onboard and attach. So the we
00:59:00 Speaker 14: had to submit both an ask
00:59:02 Speaker 14: and the proposed target attachment. And
00:59:05 Speaker 14: then what happens? And I don't
00:59:07 Speaker 14: know if this happens in other
00:59:08 Speaker 14: areas when you put a proposal
00:59:10 Speaker 14: into the province. You ask for
00:59:12 Speaker 14: something and say this is what
00:59:15 Speaker 14: we're going to do, and they
00:59:17 Speaker 14: come back and say, actually, we're
00:59:20 Speaker 14: going to give you twenty percent
00:59:21 Speaker 14: of what you asked for, and
00:59:23 Speaker 14: this is now your target, which
00:59:26 Speaker 14: is like half of what you
00:59:27 Speaker 14: said you could do. Yeah, so
00:59:29 Speaker 14: that's kind of like that's what
00:59:31 Speaker 14: we ended up with. So we
00:59:32 Speaker 14: ended up in the first round
00:59:33 Speaker 14: getting, I think, I want to
00:59:35 Speaker 14: say two and a half million
00:59:37 Speaker 14: to attach about twenty five hundred
00:59:39 Speaker 14: people, and what they ended up
00:59:40 Speaker 14: coming. out with a bit later
00:59:42 Speaker 14: is targets aligned to specific positions.
00:59:46 Speaker 14: So, a nurse practitioner. If I
00:59:49 Speaker 14: was going to, let's say, I'm
00:59:51 Speaker 14: a primary care organization, I'm applying
00:59:53 Speaker 14: for a nurse practitioner position. The
00:59:57 Speaker 14: funding for it that comes along
00:59:59 Speaker 14: with a target of 800 patients.
01:00:02 Speaker 14: So, and then a. another health
01:00:06 Speaker 14: service provider, let's say like a
01:00:08 Speaker 14: social worker, that number is 250.
01:00:11 Speaker 14: Okay, so let's say I'm an
01:00:14 Speaker 14: organization. I ask for a nurse
01:00:18 Speaker 14: practitioner funding for a nurse practitioner
01:00:21 Speaker 14: and a social worker. My target
01:00:23 Speaker 14: then has to be 1,050 patients.
01:00:25 Speaker 14: So that's kind of how it
01:00:28 Speaker 14: works right now. We all know
01:00:33 Speaker 14: in like that's not actually how
01:00:37 Speaker 14: it works in any way, but
01:00:40 Speaker 14: that's how the funding is being.
01:00:43 Speaker 14: allocated, but it also has to
01:00:45 Speaker 14: be thought of in okay, like
01:00:46 Speaker 14: if I'm, you know, the executive
01:00:49 Speaker 14: director of an organization, what is
01:00:55 Speaker 14: possible for me to do in
01:00:57 Speaker 14: one year? Do I have space
01:00:59 Speaker 14: to bring these people on? Do
01:01:01 Speaker 14: I think I can actually hire
01:01:03 Speaker 14: a nurse practitioner in a year
01:01:09 Speaker 14: to meet that target? Because that's
01:01:12 Speaker 14: what I'm going to be accountable
01:01:14 Speaker 14: for. So, the um, you know,
01:01:16 Speaker 14: the numbers again, and the so
01:01:19 Speaker 14: the organizations that received funding in
01:01:22 Speaker 14: that. first round were Kingardon Family
01:01:24 Speaker 14: Health Team and the Brockton and
01:01:29 Speaker 14: Area Family Health Team, but the
01:01:31 Speaker 14: Kingardon Family Health Team, their funding
01:01:41 Speaker 14: actually went to support physician groups
01:01:42 Speaker 14: in Soggin Shores, so two of
01:01:45 Speaker 08: them, as well as the Meaford
01:01:46 Speaker 08: Thornbury and Fleischerton physician group. So
01:01:48 Speaker 08: it really was like, you know,
01:01:51 Speaker 08: quite complex in terms. of where
01:01:54 Speaker 14: funding flowed because of where it
01:01:58 Speaker 14: could only flow and where that
01:02:01 Speaker 14: money actually went to support attachment.
01:02:02 Speaker 14: So, the numbers, like we have
01:02:04 Speaker 14: them, whether they give you a
01:02:06 Speaker 14: lot of information that is helpful,
01:02:09 Speaker 14: I'm not sure. But that is
01:02:10 Speaker 14: kind of you know what we're
01:02:13 Speaker 14: working with and the targets this
01:02:15 Speaker 14: time around. So actually, every every
01:02:18 Speaker 14: primary care organization and physician group
01:02:20 Speaker 14: in the entire region was involved
01:02:21 Speaker 14: in our second proposal that we
01:02:24 Speaker 14: put in last November, and that
01:02:27 Speaker 14: was approved in April of this
01:02:30 Speaker 14: year. And so, all organizations have
01:02:32 Speaker 14: targets that are aligned with the
01:02:35 Speaker 14: amount of funding, which align with
01:02:36 Speaker 14: the the like eight hundred and
01:02:38 Speaker 14: two fifty that. that I was
01:02:40 Speaker 14: was speaking to, so that's the
01:02:43 Speaker 14: way that we kind of sorted
01:02:47 Speaker 14: it out. So I hope that
01:02:50 Speaker 14: sorry, it's really really difficult to
01:02:51 Speaker 14: explain, but yeah. Thank you for
01:02:53 Speaker 14: that. And just the last piece
01:02:56 Speaker 14: was patients who could be at
01:02:59 Speaker 14: risk of de rostering. How Risk
01:03:06 Speaker 14: of de-rostering? How's how's the counting
01:03:10 Speaker 01: process there? Just to ensure there's
01:03:12 Speaker 01: no double counting. Yeah. So the
01:03:13 Speaker 01: way that the numbers are counted
01:03:14 Speaker 01: for this funding is that when
01:03:15 Speaker 01: they establish like the start of
01:03:17 Speaker 01: the funding. So for this second
01:03:19 Speaker 01: round of funding, the start was
01:03:21 Speaker 01: April first, twenty twenty six. And
01:03:23 Speaker 01: so what each organization has to
01:03:24 Speaker 01: do is take their baseline roster.
01:03:25 Speaker 01: So let's say, Owen Sand Family
01:03:29 Speaker 01: Health Team. thirty thousand, let's say,
01:03:30 Speaker 01: and then any like you have
01:03:31 Speaker 01: a target of okay, your target
01:03:32 Speaker 01: based on the funding you're
01:03:34 Speaker 01: getting is two thousand net new
01:03:36 Speaker 01: patients. So it's like by the
01:03:38 Speaker 01: end of that, you know, when
01:03:39 Speaker 01: their target the by the deadline
01:03:41 Speaker 01: to hit the target, their roster
01:03:42 Speaker 01: has to be thirty two thousand.
01:03:44 Speaker 01: So whether they lose a physician
01:03:45 Speaker 01: and there's a thousand that are
01:03:47 Speaker 01: de rostered, like it has to
01:03:48 Speaker 01: be. like net new attachments. So
01:03:50 Speaker 01: yes, if you know if we
01:03:54 Speaker 01: end up losing a physician, then
01:04:00 Speaker 01: that's a lot of extra work
01:04:01 Speaker 01: that has to be done in
01:04:03 Speaker 01: order to actually hit that net
01:04:05 Speaker 01: new attachment number. Okay, thank you.
01:04:07 Speaker 01: Any further hands or questions? Not
01:04:12 Speaker 01: seen any. So thank you. It
01:04:14 Speaker 01: is always very helpful that you
01:04:19 Speaker 01: come to us on a regular
01:04:21 Speaker 01: basis, as you have been doing,
01:04:22 Speaker 01: because then hopefully then the questions
01:04:24 Speaker 01: won't be insurmountable. So we very
01:04:26 Speaker 01: much appreciate that update and all
01:04:34 Speaker 01: of the information and the follow
01:04:36 Speaker 01: up information that you've offered as
01:04:39 Speaker 01: well. So thank you for coming
01:04:43 Speaker 01: today. Okay. So what we're going
5 Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion
Councillor Paul McQueen moved to determine items requiring separate discussion from the consent agenda before a morning break and annual photo opportunity. Aaron Whitney subsequently moved to place specific items on the consent agenda for approval without further debate. The council authorized staff to apply for a loan with Infrastructure Ontario, aiming to consolidate applications for two paramedic bases in Durham and Feversham.
01:04:45 Speaker 01: to do at this point in
01:04:49 Speaker 01: time is I'm going to put
01:04:51 Speaker 01: a call out for the determination
01:04:52 Speaker 01: of items requiring separate discussion, so
01:04:56 Speaker 01: that staff will be aware if
01:04:57 Speaker 01: there's anything pulled from the consent
01:04:59 Speaker 01: agenda, and once we have voted
01:05:01 Speaker 01: on. the consent agenda, we will
01:05:03 Speaker 01: do our morning break, and at
01:05:05 Speaker 01: that point time, we will be
01:05:07 Speaker 01: doing the annual photo. So we're
01:05:09 Speaker 01: going to ask during the break
01:05:11 Speaker 01: time that we all gather for
01:05:13 Speaker 01: the photo first, before going off
01:05:14 Speaker 01: for refreshments, etc. So with that,
01:05:17 Speaker 01: it is there are eight. Looks
01:05:19 Speaker 01: like five, six, seven, eight. Yes,
01:05:21 Speaker 01: eight items on the consent agenda.
01:05:24 Speaker 01: Are there any that any committee,
01:05:26 Speaker 01: the whole members wish to pull,
01:05:28 Speaker 01: Councillor Eccles? Yes, thank you, Warden.
01:05:31 Speaker 01: Through you, six E and six
01:05:32 Speaker 01: F. Okay, so six E and
01:05:35 Speaker 01: F are polled. Councillor Carleton, and
01:05:37 Speaker 01: then I'll go to Councillor McKay
01:05:38 Speaker 01: after that. Thank you, Warden. I
01:05:40 Speaker 01: would like six B and six
01:05:42 Speaker 01: D. Okay, Councillor McKay. Thank you,
01:05:44 Speaker 01: through you, Warden. Six A, please.
01:05:45 Speaker 01: 6A, please. Want to get them
01:05:54 Speaker 01: all removed. Okay, so we've got
01:05:55 Speaker 01: 6C, G, and H left. Anyone
01:05:57 Speaker 01: want those ones pulled? Okay. Don't
01:05:58 Speaker 13: see any other hands raised. So
01:06:12 Speaker 17: in that case, then it's recommended
01:06:15 Speaker 13: that the following consent agenda consent
01:22:35 Speaker 18: items be received, and that staff
01:22:38 Speaker 18: be authorized to take actions necessary
01:22:40 Speaker 18: to give effect to the recommendations
01:22:42 Speaker 18: in the staff reports, and that
01:22:44 Speaker 18: the correspondence be supported or received
01:22:47 Speaker 18: for information. as recommended in the
01:22:51 Speaker 18: consent agenda, and this will be
01:22:54 Speaker 18: we will be voting on six
01:23:00 Speaker 18: C, G, and H only. So
01:23:01 Speaker 18: may ask for a mover and
01:23:03 Speaker 18: a seconder. Moved by Councillor Dobrin,
01:23:06 Speaker 18: seconded by Councillor Patterson. It's on
01:23:09 Speaker 18: the floor for any discussion. All
01:23:12 Speaker 18: those in favor, and that motion
01:23:13 Speaker 18: is carried. So after the break,
01:23:15 Speaker 18: we will continue with the two
01:23:19 Speaker 18: items for discussion on section seven,
01:23:23 Speaker 19: and then we will return to
01:23:25 Speaker 19: the pulled items for section six.
01:23:26 Speaker 19: before going into closed close meetings,
01:23:30 Speaker 19: which is scheduled for later in
01:23:33 Speaker 19: the committee of the whole. So
01:23:36 Speaker 19: let's take our break. We will
01:23:37 Speaker 19: be doing the photo as well.
01:23:39 Speaker 19: So, Madam Clerk, what time would
01:23:41 Speaker 19: you like everybody back? Okay, so
01:23:43 Speaker 19: we're going to do eleven twenty,
01:23:45 Speaker 19: a little longer than usual because
01:23:47 Speaker 19: we do need to do the
01:23:49 Speaker 19: photo first. Okay, thank you. It's
01:23:52 Speaker 19: in the lobby, and Olivia from
01:23:54 Speaker 19: Communications will meet you there. Okay.
01:23:55 Speaker 19: The the warden has been. She
01:23:57 Speaker 19: is away to a community event
01:23:58 Speaker 19: in the. Blue Mountains, so she's
01:23:59 Speaker 19: asked me to take the chair
01:24:01 Speaker 19: for the balance of the meeting.
01:24:03 Speaker 19: So, sorry for your luck. West
01:24:04 Speaker 19: Gray is no longer a member
01:24:06 Speaker 19: of Gray County Council. Excellent. All
01:24:10 Speaker 19: right. Well, we'll start off with
01:24:13 Speaker 19: items for direction and discussion. The
01:24:14 Speaker 19: first is report FRCW seventeen twenty
01:24:16 Speaker 19: six financing for paramedic services based.
01:24:20 Speaker 19: For paramedic services bases in Durham
01:24:22 Speaker 19: and Beavercam, Garrett is here to
01:24:23 Speaker 19: give us this report. I need
01:24:25 Speaker 19: a mover and seconder, please. Councilor
01:24:28 Speaker 19: Pringle, Councilor Mackey, thank you, Garrett.
01:24:30 Speaker 19: Welcome. Floor is yours, sir. Through
01:24:31 Speaker 19: the Deputy Boarding. Thank you and
01:24:34 Speaker 19: good morning. The report in front
01:24:36 Speaker 19: of you is requesting staff to
01:24:39 Speaker 19: have the authorization to apply for
01:24:41 Speaker 19: a loan with Infrastructure Ontario and
01:24:42 Speaker 19: to bring back a buy. And
01:24:45 Speaker 19: to bring back a bylaw to
01:24:49 Speaker 19: the next meeting of council that
01:24:51 Speaker 19: is required for that loan. Staff
01:24:54 Speaker 19: have had an initial meeting with
01:24:56 Speaker 19: Infrastructure Ontario, and they've actually recommended
01:24:58 Speaker 19: that the two capital projects that
01:25:00 Speaker 19: require financing be rolled into one
01:25:03 Speaker 19: application. They likened it to applying
01:25:04 Speaker 19: for a personal mortgage, where there's
01:25:07 Speaker 19: a credit application and a background
01:25:09 Speaker 19: process, and they really prefer that
01:25:14 Speaker 19: you only do one a year
01:25:18 Speaker 19: because it does take quite a
01:25:20 Speaker 19: bit of time. We still can
01:25:22 Speaker 19: do separate draws on the projects;
01:25:23 Speaker 19: we don't take all the money
01:25:26 Speaker 19: at one time. but packaging them
01:25:28 Speaker 19: under one joint application is the
01:25:30 Speaker 19: recommendation of Infrastructure Ontario. So the
01:25:31 Speaker 19: two projects that we'd be looking
01:25:33 Speaker 19: to finance are the Durham Paramedic
01:25:35 Speaker 19: Base, which was substantially completed in
01:25:36 Speaker 19: September, but there were some final
01:25:38 Speaker 19: items that needed to be cleaned
01:25:39 Speaker 19: up, and then we're just receiving
01:25:43 Speaker 19: the final invoicing now, which was
01:25:44 Speaker 19: expected to be based on the
01:25:46 Speaker 19: update or based on the award
01:25:49 Speaker 19: report PSR CW ten twenty. four
01:25:52 Speaker 19: to be approximately two point nine
01:25:54 Speaker 19: three three million, but based on
01:25:56 Speaker 19: not using all of the project
01:25:58 Speaker 19: contingencies, is going to come in
01:25:59 Speaker 19: at approximately two million seven hundred
01:26:02 Speaker 19: fifty thousand dollars. The second project
01:26:03 Speaker 19: is the Feversham Paramedic Base, which
01:26:05 Speaker 19: has been awarded through PSR CW
01:26:07 Speaker 19: oh six twenty five and is
01:26:08 Speaker 19: anticipated to have an overall project
01:26:11 Speaker 19: cost of two million three hundred
01:26:13 Speaker 19: ninety two thousand dollars. and is
01:26:15 Speaker 19: expected to be completed in late
01:26:16 Speaker 19: 2026. But similar to the Durham
01:26:19 Speaker 19: base, final invoicing and wrap up
01:26:22 Speaker 19: could could bleed into 2027. The
01:26:24 Speaker 19: two projects are now under budget,
01:26:26 Speaker 19: or sorry, are under budget. What
01:26:29 Speaker 19: we need to finance as well
01:26:31 Speaker 19: as we were able to use
01:26:33 Speaker 19: the current year's planned adventure payments,
01:26:34 Speaker 19: which total three hundred and sixty-two
01:26:37 Speaker 19: thousand six hundred dollars, and apply
01:26:40 Speaker 19: them against the amount we. have
01:26:42 Speaker 19: to borrow. So we're basically making
01:26:44 Speaker 19: our first adventure payment to ourselves,
01:26:46 Speaker 19: and then going out for the
01:26:48 Speaker 19: net. And then with the Chatsworth
01:26:50 Speaker 19: base, there was also some development
01:26:52 Speaker 19: charges and previous year reserve contributions
01:26:56 Speaker 19: that we're able to use as
01:26:59 Speaker 19: well, bringing that required borrow down
01:27:00 Speaker 19: to just under two point two
01:27:01 Speaker 19: million dollars. The budgets were built
01:27:03 Speaker 19: on the assumption that these bases
01:27:05 Speaker 19: would be financed over twenty five
01:27:08 Speaker 19: years at a five percent borrowing
01:27:09 Speaker 19: rate, and that's how we come.
01:27:12 Speaker 19: to the one hundred ninety-two thousand
01:27:15 Speaker 19: eight hundred dollars that's in the
01:27:16 Speaker 19: current budget for the Durham Deventure,
01:27:18 Speaker 19: and one hundred sixty-nine thousand eight
01:27:21 Speaker 19: hundred dollars that's in the Beaver
01:27:23 Speaker 19: Sham Deventure. These numbers carry forward
01:27:25 Speaker 19: throughout the ten-year capital plan, and
01:27:27 Speaker 19: if we had a twenty-five-year capital
01:27:30 Speaker 19: plan, they would continue for the
01:27:32 Speaker 19: next twenty-five years. Staff are recommending
01:27:33 Speaker 19: that we change the plan slightly.
01:27:35 Speaker 19: Instead of amortizing over a twenty-five-year
01:27:36 Speaker 19: loan, that we secure a a
01:27:38 Speaker 19: twenty-year loan instead. The reasons that
01:27:40 Speaker 19: we're recommending that is it comes
01:27:41 Speaker 19: at a slightly lower borrowing rate
01:27:43 Speaker 19: based on the current rates offered
01:27:45 Speaker 19: by Infrastructure Ontario, and it allows
01:27:48 Speaker 19: us to use the project savings
01:27:50 Speaker 19: that we've seen to eliminate five
01:27:53 Speaker 19: years of mortgage payments at the
01:27:56 Speaker 19: end of the loan, and will
01:27:59 Speaker 19: save the county approximately eight hundred
01:28:01 Speaker 19: and twenty-one thousand dollars over the
01:28:02 Speaker 19: term of that loan in interest
01:28:04 Speaker 19: payments. It's still within the approved
01:28:05 Speaker 19: capital. budget of three hundred sixty-two
01:28:07 Speaker 19: thousand six hundred. As based on
01:28:09 Speaker 19: current rates, would be at about
01:28:10 Speaker 19: three hundred and forty-four thousand. Would
01:28:12 Speaker 19: be the total mortgage payment, but
01:28:13 Speaker 19: that will be dependent on what
01:28:16 Speaker 19: the rates are when we actually
01:28:17 Speaker 19: draw the financing, as Infrastructure Ontario
01:28:19 Speaker 19: updates them weekly. And then the
01:28:20 Speaker 19: only other thing, or two other
01:28:22 Speaker 19: things I want to highlight is
01:28:24 Speaker 19: we haven't the Chatsworth base. We
01:28:25 Speaker 19: finance internally, and typically, and same
01:28:26 Speaker 19: with the administration building, typically. loans
01:28:29 Speaker 19: of this scale, we've decided to
01:28:31 Speaker 19: borrow against our own reserves, charge
01:28:35 Speaker 19: ourselves interest, and pay ourselves back
01:28:37 Speaker 19: the interest because we can do
01:28:38 Speaker 19: it at a slightly more competitive
01:28:41 Speaker 19: rate. But you still want to
01:28:43 Speaker 19: charge yourself the interest because you're
01:28:46 Speaker 19: losing out on the opportunity cost
01:28:48 Speaker 19: of having that money in your
01:28:50 Speaker 19: bank account or investing that money
01:28:52 Speaker 19: while you're paying yourself back. For
01:28:55 Speaker 19: these paramedic loans, we're recommending to
01:28:57 Speaker 19: go external for the purpose of
01:29:00 Speaker 19: maximizing provincial funding. So the interest
01:29:02 Speaker 19: cost. on these ventures are eligible
01:29:05 Speaker 19: for fifty-fifty funding from the Ministry
7.a FR-CW-17-26 Financing Paramedic Services Bases in Durham and Feversham
Sim Salata explained that borrowing at standard rates allows the province to return ineligible internal interest funds via Infrastructure Ontario rules, resulting in a net cost for financing paramedic service bases externally rather than using restricted capital. Tara Warder noted that while Gray County has an annual debt repayment limit calculated via FIR filings as a specific high figure, the county's own threshold restricts repayments to ten percent of own-source revenues, capping available funds at a lower amount because current obligations for the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment project consume a significant portion annually from this limit. Council approved a permanent position for the Green Development Program coordinator instead of a short-term contract, enabling better recruitment and offsetting budget costs against Natural Resources Canada grants to reduce projected expenses in 2027.
01:29:09 Speaker 19: of Health. So if I take
01:29:10 Speaker 19: a simple number and say that
01:29:12 Speaker 19: we can borrow at five percent,
01:29:13 Speaker 19: the province is then going to
01:29:18 Speaker 19: give us back two point five
01:29:20 Speaker 19: percent in grants. So our our
01:29:22 Speaker 19: net borrowing cost is two point
01:29:23 Speaker 19: five million dollars. We can then
01:29:25 Speaker 19: go out and take that money
01:29:26 Speaker 19: that we we might have used
01:29:28 Speaker 19: to finance it ourselves and invest
01:29:30 Speaker 19: it. And even if we're earning
01:29:32 Speaker 19: a rate of three percent, there's
01:29:36 Speaker 19: a point five percent that the
01:29:37 Speaker 19: county is now making. on that
01:29:40 Speaker 19: money, so it really does make
01:29:42 Speaker 19: sense based on the grant structure
01:29:44 Speaker 19: to finance these externally. As internal
01:29:46 Speaker 19: interest is not an eligible expense
01:29:47 Speaker 19: with Infrastructure Ontario, and then I've
01:29:50 Speaker 19: highlighted that under the Municipal Act,
01:29:52 Speaker 19: we do have the authority to
01:29:54 Speaker 19: borrow, but it is limited. We
01:29:56 Speaker 19: can only go up to 25%
01:29:57 Speaker 19: of our own sourced revenues, and
01:30:00 Speaker 19: that's calculated through our annual FIR
01:30:02 Speaker 19: filing. As of 2026, that amount
01:30:04 Speaker 19: that we could have in annual
01:30:05 Speaker 19: debt repayments before exceeding that threshold
01:30:07 Speaker 19: is twenty-four million one hundred and
01:30:10 Speaker 19: ninety-six thousand nine hundred fifty-seven dollars.
01:30:12 Speaker 19: However, Gray County has its own
01:30:22 Speaker 20: internal threshold that annual debt repayments
01:30:27 Speaker 20: shall not exceed ten percent of
01:30:31 Speaker 20: the own-source revenues. So that means
01:30:36 Speaker 20: that we can go up to
01:30:39 Speaker 20: nine point nine million eight hundred
01:30:41 Speaker 20: thirty-eight thousand seven hundred eighty-two dollars.
01:30:45 Speaker 20: Currently, after last year's budget. process,
01:30:50 Speaker 20: the county has no debt, so
01:30:51 Speaker 20: this would be the only debt
01:30:53 Speaker 20: on the books. But as we
01:30:56 Speaker 20: know, we are going to be
01:31:00 Speaker 20: having debt payments for the new
01:31:04 Speaker 20: Rockwood Terrace redevelopment project, and those
01:31:06 Speaker 20: are expected to be approximately three
01:31:08 Speaker 20: point six million dollars per year.
01:31:10 Speaker 20: However, that full amount does not
01:31:18 Speaker 20: go against our annual repayment limit
01:31:20 Speaker 20: because we have a dedicated provincial
01:31:21 Speaker 20: grant. So you take the net
01:31:23 Speaker 19: of one point nine million dollars.
01:31:26 Speaker 19: So you take the net of
01:31:29 Speaker 19: those two numbers. and the Rockwood
01:31:30 Speaker 19: Terrace project will consume one point
01:31:32 Speaker 19: seven million dollars of our annual
01:31:34 Speaker 19: repayment limit. So, when you combine
01:31:36 Speaker 19: that with these loans, we will
01:31:40 Speaker 19: have about two million dollars of
01:31:42 Speaker 19: annual repayments of debt in our
01:31:46 Speaker 19: budget, which would leave about seven
01:31:48 Speaker 19: point seven nine million dollars for
01:31:51 Speaker 19: any future projects. With that, I'm
01:31:53 Speaker 19: happy to answer any questions. Thank
01:31:55 Speaker 19: you, sir. Very comprehensive. Are there
01:31:56 Speaker 19: any questions from council? Councillor Apples,
01:31:57 Speaker 19: please. Thank you, Deputy Warden. Through
01:31:58 Speaker 19: you, so going forward, we certainly
01:32:00 Speaker 19: have a very robust build out
01:32:03 Speaker 19: of stations, and I take it
01:32:04 Speaker 19: that staff best feeling is in
01:32:06 Speaker 19: building out the number of ones
01:32:07 Speaker 19: done. Dundalk, Holstein, Aten, Cobble Beach.
01:32:08 Speaker 19: How many other ones am I
01:32:12 Speaker 19: missing that we're going to be
01:32:16 Speaker 19: developing? There's six more. We will
01:32:17 Speaker 19: be looking at financing those ones
01:32:20 Speaker 19: instead of ramping up some of
01:32:23 Speaker 19: our tax revenues. Obviously, ramping it
01:32:25 Speaker 19: up a little bit to pay
01:32:27 Speaker 19: off the mortgage and not to
01:32:31 Speaker 19: directly pay it off. Through the
01:32:32 Speaker 19: deputy warden, yes, that's correct. The
01:32:36 Speaker 19: way our ten-year capital plan is
01:32:39 Speaker 19: built right now is all the
01:32:42 Speaker 19: future bases will be debt financed
01:32:44 Speaker 08: as well. With the Durham base,
01:32:46 Speaker 08: it was in the capital plan
01:32:49 Speaker 08: before the enhancement plan came along
01:32:50 Speaker 08: because we knew we needed more
01:32:52 Speaker 08: space. But the enhancement plan made
01:32:55 Speaker 08: that base bigger as we needed
01:32:58 Speaker 08: a operational base at the south
01:32:59 Speaker 08: end. of the county, the other
01:33:03 Speaker 08: bases, there's simply not enough time
01:33:06 Speaker 08: to build up that reserve so
01:33:08 Speaker 08: that we could finance it all
01:33:10 Speaker 08: ourselves. In a perfect world, yeah,
01:33:12 Speaker 08: if we knew we were building
01:33:16 Speaker 08: it in 25 years, we would
01:33:19 Speaker 08: start putting away money now. Or
01:33:22 Speaker 08: 10 years, even you would you
01:33:24 Speaker 08: would you could potentially increase your
01:33:26 Speaker 08: levy now, transfer to reserve, and
01:33:28 Speaker 08: then when it comes to actually
01:33:31 Speaker 08: build it, you're just paying for
01:33:32 Speaker 08: it outright, and your interest costs
01:33:36 Speaker 08: are zero. But with the deployment
01:33:38 Speaker 08: plan coming and the immediate need
01:33:40 Speaker 08: for additional ambulances and the additional
01:33:41 Speaker 08: need to put those ambulances somewhere,
01:33:43 Speaker 08: and then the benefit of having
01:33:45 Speaker 08: these rural bases built, there just
01:33:47 Speaker 08: wasn't enough time to build up
01:33:50 Speaker 08: those capital reserves that we could
01:33:52 Speaker 08: fund it. Councillor Gregg, did you
01:33:54 Speaker 08: have a question? Thank you. I
01:33:56 Speaker 08: did have a question. I I
01:33:58 Speaker 08: just. I'm intrigued with the option
01:33:59 Speaker 08: of the 15 years. The report
01:34:01 Speaker 08: notes the savings from going from
01:34:04 Speaker 08: 25 to 20 years, but there's
01:34:06 Speaker 08: substantial savings in going to 15
01:34:08 Speaker 08: years. I was talking to Garrett
01:34:10 Speaker 08: in advance, and Garrett could expand
01:34:11 Speaker 08: upon the the response provided to
01:34:16 Speaker 08: myself. But when I look at
01:34:19 Speaker 08: the just the core numbers, your
01:34:20 Speaker 08: borrowing cost is is 38 of
01:34:25 Speaker 08: the actual amount required to borrow.
01:34:26 Speaker 08: if you were to invest in
01:34:29 Speaker 08: in a mortgage over fifteen years,
01:34:31 Speaker 08: as opposed to fifty five percent
01:34:35 Speaker 08: over twenty years. There t here
01:34:37 Speaker 08: is an upfront cost, but I
01:34:39 Speaker 08: think you know it does get
01:34:40 Speaker 08: it paid off. It's nice. We're
01:34:46 Speaker 08: in a great position right now
01:34:51 Speaker 19: with zero debt. That's the best
01:34:53 Speaker 19: place to be, and I am
01:34:57 Speaker 19: I am a little bit more
01:35:00 Speaker 19: intrigued, certainly to to. look at
01:35:03 Speaker 19: a fifteen year mortgage that gets
01:35:04 Speaker 19: us back to that position, and
01:35:06 Speaker 19: it's a position where we can
01:35:08 Speaker 19: make, and you can make those
01:35:11 Speaker 19: contributions back into your capital fund
01:35:13 Speaker 19: after you've paid it off. Because
01:35:14 Speaker 19: after thirty years, that's you know
01:35:16 Speaker 19: frankly a time period that you're
01:35:17 Speaker 19: going to start having to reinvest
01:35:19 Speaker 19: back into your your typical building.
01:35:20 Speaker 19: So it gives you more opportunity
01:35:23 Speaker 19: as opposed to a twenty or
01:35:24 Speaker 19: twenty five year when you're still
01:35:26 Speaker 19: making capital payments or debenture payments
01:35:27 Speaker 19: on the capital. cost to be
01:35:28 Speaker 19: able to have it paid off,
01:35:30 Speaker 19: and be looking a little bit
01:35:34 Speaker 19: more forward in terms of making
01:35:37 Speaker 19: reserve contributions to support the the
01:35:40 Speaker 19: required capital needs after after thirty,
01:35:44 Speaker 19: thirty five, forty years that so
01:35:45 Speaker 19: many of our buildings require.
01:35:48 Speaker 19: But I guess that's my position,
01:35:50 Speaker 19: Garrett. If you want to expand
01:35:53 Speaker 19: on the difference in the capital
01:36:09 Speaker 19: budget requirement up front versus the
01:36:11 Speaker 19: ultimate. savings over that reduction from
01:36:13 Speaker 19: twenty years to fifteen years. I
01:36:14 Speaker 19: think I'm I kind of find
01:36:16 Speaker 19: it favorable the fifteen year option.
01:36:18 Speaker 19: Thank you through the warded deputy
01:36:20 Speaker 19: warded. Yeah, staff are happy to
01:36:22 Speaker 19: take direction from council on whatever
01:36:26 Speaker 19: term most suits your needs. A
01:36:31 Speaker 21: shorter borrowing period. You're correct. Results
01:36:35 Speaker 21: in lower cost over the term
01:36:37 Speaker 21: of the loan because you're paying
01:36:42 Speaker 21: it off faster. So, you know,
01:36:43 Speaker 21: if you look at the horizon
01:36:45 Speaker 21: of a 25-year mortgage, at the
01:36:46 Speaker 21: beginning, almost the entirety of your
01:36:49 Speaker 21: payment is going towards interest, and
01:36:51 Speaker 21: then as it goes along, it
01:36:53 Speaker 21: kind of drops off like this
01:36:55 Speaker 21: as as the as the payments
01:36:56 Speaker 21: are become more and more principal.
01:36:59 Speaker 21: If you shorten the term, you're
01:37:00 Speaker 21: increasing your payment. As so, at
01:37:02 Speaker 21: the beginning, your interest cost is
01:37:03 Speaker 21: the exact same, but you're paying
01:37:10 Speaker 19: off more of the principal, and
01:37:12 Speaker 19: that cascades every year. So, correct.
01:37:14 Speaker 19: If we want, if council directs
01:37:16 Speaker 19: us to go towards a a
01:37:18 Speaker 19: fifteen year mortgage, that'll certainly save.
01:37:21 Speaker 19: It'll save approximately seven hundred and
01:37:22 Speaker 19: fifty thousand dollars compared to the
01:37:25 Speaker 19: recommendation that's that's currently before you.
01:37:27 Speaker 19: But it will require an increase
01:37:29 Speaker 19: to the twenty twenty seven capital
01:37:29 Speaker 19: budget of. So currently, there's three
01:37:32 Speaker 19: hundred and sixty-two thousand in the
01:37:33 Speaker 19: in the budget. We would have
01:37:37 Speaker 19: to increase that to four hundred
01:37:40 Speaker 19: and six thousand, so about forty-four
01:37:41 Speaker 19: thousand dollars additional to what was
01:37:42 Speaker 19: in the twenty twenty-six budget and
01:37:44 Speaker 19: what was in the twenty twenty-seven
01:37:48 Speaker 19: capital forecast onward. Again, there's benefits
01:37:49 Speaker 19: to both options. Thank you, Garrett.
01:37:50 Speaker 19: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very much,
01:37:52 Speaker 19: Deputy Warden. And just for clarity,
01:37:55 Speaker 19: on on Councillor Greg's idea there,
01:37:59 Speaker 19: switching over, would we have to
01:37:59 Speaker 19: actually increase the full forty four
01:38:01 Speaker 19: thousand because the province kicks in
01:38:02 Speaker 19: the grant? So I guess my
01:38:03 Speaker 19: question is, the three hundred sixty
01:38:05 Speaker 19: two thousand we're already putting away,
01:38:08 Speaker 19: the payment increases, but part of
01:38:09 Speaker 19: that payment is that. interest. Do
01:38:11 Speaker 19: we know, you know, what is
01:38:12 Speaker 19: the actual increase? It might not
01:38:14 Speaker 19: actually be the forty-four thousand dollars
01:38:15 Speaker 19: increase to the capital because the
01:38:17 Speaker 19: provincial grant kick it kickups through
01:38:18 Speaker 19: the deputy warden. Paying it off
01:38:19 Speaker 19: faster actually results in slightly less
01:38:22 Speaker 19: grant because you have less interest
01:38:29 Speaker 22: expense. So the principal repayment is
01:38:33 Speaker 22: not eligible for grant, but that
01:38:35 Speaker 22: grant was calculated already as part
01:38:36 Speaker 22: of the twenty twenty seven budget.
01:38:39 Speaker 22: Part of the 2027 budget because,
01:38:40 Speaker 22: and that's why we included it
01:38:42 Speaker 22: in the 2026 budget to make
01:38:45 Speaker 22: sure that the grant was there
01:38:48 Speaker 22: for 2027. So that grant is
01:38:52 Speaker 22: now going to be received next
01:38:54 Speaker 22: year. But then, if this decision's
01:38:56 Speaker 18: made, the interest in 2027 won't
01:38:59 Speaker 18: change because you're paying it on
01:39:01 Speaker 18: the same principal. We can't change
01:39:03 Speaker 18: that number now, but the interest
01:39:09 Speaker 18: in 2028 budget will be slightly
01:39:11 Speaker 16: lower because we paid off more
01:39:13 Speaker 16: of the debt and we're paying
01:39:18 Speaker 16: interest on less of the debt.
01:39:20 Speaker 16: So we'll be getting. reimbursed less
01:39:23 Speaker 16: on that that interest expense. So
01:39:25 Speaker 16: it's it's you're you're saving on
01:39:27 Speaker 16: one hand, but then you're slightly
01:39:29 Speaker 16: losing the grant on the other.
01:39:33 Speaker 16: But but the net, you're still
01:39:34 Speaker 16: you're still saving, but you're saving
01:39:38 Speaker 16: at fifty percent. the The provincial
01:39:41 Speaker 16: grant for paramedic services is a
01:39:49 Speaker 19: is a funny one to budget
01:39:54 Speaker 19: for because you find a savings,
01:39:59 Speaker 19: but then in the next year
01:40:01 Speaker 19: that uses loses you a little
01:40:04 Speaker 19: bit of grant. You add a
01:40:07 Speaker 19: cost, and it hurts upfront, but
01:40:08 Speaker 19: then next year the grant catches
01:40:09 Speaker 19: up. It's it's a tricky one
01:40:12 Speaker 19: aligning. our budget with with their
01:40:15 Speaker 19: grant timelines. Any other questions, Councillor
01:40:16 Speaker 19: Mackey? Thank you, Warden. I've always
01:40:19 Speaker 19: been in favor of not paying
01:40:22 Speaker 19: any more interest than I had
01:40:25 Speaker 19: to. So, if Councillor Greg is
01:40:27 Speaker 19: willing to put forth a motion
01:40:28 Speaker 19: to move it to fifteen years,
01:40:30 Speaker 19: I'd be happy to second it.
01:40:36 Speaker 19: Councillor Greg, any thoughts? Well, I
01:40:39 Speaker 19: will make that amendment. Okay, Councillor
01:40:40 Speaker 19: Greg has moved an amendment to
01:40:43 Speaker 19: the motion to change the payment
01:40:45 Speaker 19: repayment period to 15 years. Is
01:40:49 Speaker 19: that yep? And Councillor Mackey is
01:40:50 Speaker 19: willing to second that. Any discussion
01:40:53 Speaker 19: on the amendment, Councillor Dubreuil? Thank
01:40:57 Speaker 23: you, and through you, Deputy Warden,
01:40:59 Speaker 23: to the point. I have
01:41:02 Speaker 23: no objection to changing the amortization
01:41:07 Speaker 23: period. I guess my question is
01:41:10 Speaker 23: more skepticism. Is there in writing
01:41:12 Speaker 23: that the funding from the government
01:41:13 Speaker 23: on the interest payment will continue
01:41:15 Speaker 23: for the period or term of
01:41:17 Speaker 23: the loan, or could we be
01:41:22 Speaker 24: in a situation where we have
01:41:24 Speaker 24: the loan and they cancel the
01:41:25 Speaker 24: funding formula? Sort of the same
01:41:27 Speaker 24: question as Santa Claus real. Garrett.
01:41:28 Speaker 24: The deputy warden. That the answer
01:41:33 Speaker 24: is no. We do our grant
01:41:35 Speaker 24: on a single year basis. The
01:41:39 Speaker 24: grant formula hasn't changed in the
01:41:43 Speaker 24: last six, seven years. I believe
01:41:45 Speaker 24: at seven years ago, we used
01:41:48 Speaker 24: to get an inflationary increase on
01:41:50 Speaker 24: the previous year's expenses. That was
01:41:51 Speaker 24: removed. So the grant hasn't changed.
01:41:53 Speaker 24: but in theory, yes, the Ministry
01:41:55 Speaker 24: of Health could change their eligibility
01:41:57 Speaker 24: criteria or their funding model for
01:41:59 Speaker 24: paramedic services as a whole and
01:42:00 Speaker 24: disqualify interest on borrowing. And these
01:42:03 Speaker 24: would become an ineligible expense, and
01:42:05 Speaker 24: now we'd be paying 100 of
01:42:08 Speaker 24: the the interest. Any further discussion
01:42:09 Speaker 24: on the amendment? Not seeing any.
01:42:11 Speaker 24: I'll call the question. All those
01:42:14 Speaker 24: in favor? That is carried. So
01:42:17 Speaker 24: now we're back to the original
01:42:19 Speaker 24: motion as amended. Any further discussion?
01:42:21 Speaker 24: I'll call the question. All those
01:42:23 Speaker 24: in favor? That is carried. Thank
01:42:28 Speaker 24: you, Garrett. Moving on to the
01:42:31 Speaker 24: next item, which is CW twenty-two
01:42:34 Speaker 24: dash twenty-six Green Development Program staffing
01:42:35 Speaker 24: issue. The update. Sorry. Sorry. Update.
01:42:37 Speaker 24: The the deputy CEO will
01:42:38 Speaker 24: be taking this one. Welcome, Nile.
01:42:41 Speaker 24: Taking this one, welcome, Niall. The
01:42:44 Speaker 24: floor is yours. Oh, we need
01:42:47 Speaker 24: a mover and seconder, please. Councillor
01:42:51 Speaker 24: Pringle, Councillor Nielsen. Floor is yours,
01:42:54 Speaker 24: sir. Good morning. Thank you, Deputy
01:42:57 Speaker 24: Warden. Good morning, members of Council.
01:42:59 Speaker 24: I will keep my comments fairly
01:43:00 Speaker 24: brief on this one. This is
01:43:03 Speaker 24: a good news, bad news, good
01:43:06 Speaker 24: news story. So, congratulations to our
01:43:08 Speaker 24: manager of climate change initiatives, who
01:43:10 Speaker 24: is moving on into an educational
01:43:12 Speaker 24: leave to. to complete some some
01:43:14 Speaker 24: further education in terms of of
01:43:16 Speaker 24: climate science and environmental sciences, which
01:43:18 Speaker 24: is which is fantastic when somebody
01:43:22 Speaker 24: moves on into into great things
01:43:25 Speaker 24: in their career. That of course
01:43:28 Speaker 24: leaves us with a vacancy in
01:43:30 Speaker 24: that role. The good news that
01:43:33 Speaker 24: we have is we have a
01:43:34 Speaker 24: coordinator who has been with the
01:43:36 Speaker 24: county for a number of years
01:43:39 Speaker 24: and who is agreeable to and
01:43:41 Speaker 24: keen to step into an interim
01:43:42 Speaker 24: capacity as manager to be able
01:43:45 Speaker 24: to see us through. certainly the
01:43:47 Speaker 24: next few months as we go
01:43:50 Speaker 24: through the budget process and understand
01:43:53 Speaker 24: the the future of Climate Change
01:43:54 Speaker 24: Initiative Going Green and Gray as
01:43:57 Speaker 24: per the conversations we've had over
01:44:00 Speaker 24: the last few weeks here
01:44:02 Speaker 24: at County Council. So congratulations to
01:44:04 Speaker 24: to both individuals in in those
01:44:05 Speaker 24: moves. That does leave us short,
01:44:07 Speaker 24: however, in the coordinator role, and
01:44:10 Speaker 24: that coordinator role is currently working
01:44:11 Speaker 24: on the green development. standards. The
01:44:13 Speaker 24: green development standards, as you are
01:44:15 Speaker 24: aware, is a tri-county partnership between
01:44:18 Speaker 24: ourselves, Dufferin and Wellington, recently launched
01:44:20 Speaker 24: and in the early stages of
01:44:21 Speaker 24: implementation, supporting the counties and developers
01:44:23 Speaker 24: within the counties to advance green
01:44:25 Speaker 24: development projects in their their areas.
01:44:27 Speaker 24: The interest has been high so
01:44:28 Speaker 24: far, and we're at the very
01:44:31 Speaker 24: early stages. Grey County hosts a
01:44:34 Speaker 24: coordinating A coordinator role on behalf
01:44:36 Speaker 24: of the tri-county partnership to both
01:44:39 Speaker 24: develop that program and to support
01:44:41 Speaker 24: it through its implementation. The agreement
01:44:42 Speaker 24: for supporting it through its implementation
01:44:43 Speaker 24: is fully funded through the partnership
01:44:45 Speaker 24: between the three counties and an
01:44:48 Speaker 24: NRCan Natural Resources Canada grant aid
01:44:49 Speaker 24: package. That program wraps up is
01:44:51 Speaker 24: anticipated to wrap up in summer
01:44:52 Speaker 24: of 2027. At which point the
01:44:54 Speaker 24: program is embedded within the three
01:44:56 Speaker 24: counties as part. of their core
01:44:57 Speaker 24: program. However, we have that gap
01:45:00 Speaker 24: between now and summer 2027, where
01:45:01 Speaker 24: the role of the coordinator was
01:45:03 Speaker 24: being relied on to help take
01:45:04 Speaker 24: the counties through that program. With
01:45:06 Speaker 24: the changes internally, that coordinator is
01:45:09 Speaker 24: is is shifting into the manager
01:45:12 Speaker 24: capacity, and and does not have
01:45:14 Speaker 24: the capacity to be able to
01:45:16 Speaker 24: deliver both the green development program
01:45:18 Speaker 24: and the role of of manager
01:45:20 Speaker 24: of of climate change, climate and
01:45:21 Speaker 24: environmental initiatives. here at the county,
01:45:24 Speaker 24: so that leaves us with the
01:45:26 Speaker 24: vacancy, which we'd like to backfill.
01:45:28 Speaker 24: The backfilling of that vacancy is
01:45:30 Speaker 24: relatively easy in terms of process,
01:45:32 Speaker 24: and we don't need council authorization
01:45:33 Speaker 24: for that. It's already something which
01:45:36 Speaker 24: you've approved. It's fully funded, has
01:45:37 Speaker 24: no no impact. The challenge is
01:45:40 Speaker 24: we require a skill set to
01:45:43 Speaker 24: do that work, which may be
01:45:45 Speaker 24: challenging. We anticipate will be challenging
01:45:49 Speaker 24: to find for a relatively short
01:45:52 Speaker 24: term contract of the order of
01:45:54 Speaker 24: probably nine to ten months in
01:45:56 Speaker 24: length. Given the conversations we had
01:45:58 Speaker 24: last month around the horseshoe and
01:46:02 Speaker 24: the appetite that County Council expressed
01:46:03 Speaker 24: around the the direction you provided
01:46:06 Speaker 24: in terms of coming back to
01:46:08 Speaker 24: budget with both the request for
01:46:10 Speaker 24: a full time permanent position and
01:46:11 Speaker 24: a contract position to support the
01:46:13 Speaker 24: original implementation of going green and
01:46:16 Speaker 24: grey, we thought it was prudent
01:46:18 Speaker 24: to come back to County Council
01:46:19 Speaker 24: at this point and say and
01:46:23 Speaker 24: see whether they're with appetite in
01:46:25 Speaker 24: us changing that from being a
01:46:27 Speaker 24: short term contract role to a
01:46:29 Speaker 24: permanent role. that would allow us
01:46:31 Speaker 24: to apply for a greater pool
01:46:33 Speaker 24: of candidates to be able to
01:46:36 Speaker 24: apply for the position, probably a
01:46:37 Speaker 24: more competitive recruit, and probably greater
01:46:39 Speaker 24: success in terms of identifying a
01:46:41 Speaker 24: candidate. If we were if council
01:46:45 Speaker 24: county council was supportive of this
01:46:47 Speaker 24: approach, we would have that role
01:46:50 Speaker 24: undertake the green development standards work
01:46:53 Speaker 24: for the for the initial term
01:46:55 Speaker 24: of their contract, and then step
01:46:57 Speaker 24: into the coordinator role supporting the
01:46:59 Speaker 18: going green and grey at the
01:47:01 Speaker 18: conclusion of that. and so that
01:47:05 Speaker 18: does have a positive budget impact,
01:47:11 Speaker 18: and this is the last piece
01:47:12 Speaker 18: of good news: a positive budget
01:47:15 Speaker 18: impact in terms of the proposals
01:47:17 Speaker 18: we have for the 2027 budget.
01:47:21 Speaker 18: So, when we county council saw
01:47:24 Speaker 18: the draft 2027 budget, had a
01:47:26 Speaker 18: single permanent position in for about
01:47:29 Speaker 18: 122,000 in in that year, based
01:47:34 Speaker 25: on the decisions and discussion we've
01:47:38 Speaker 25: had over the last few months.
01:47:40 Speaker 25: The impact, as I'd The impact,
01:47:43 Speaker 25: as identified in that report, was
01:47:46 Speaker 25: 196,000. This would actually allow us
01:47:48 Speaker 25: to rejig the budget because we'd
01:47:52 Speaker 25: be offsetting some of that full-time,
01:47:56 Speaker 25: that one year of that permanent
01:47:59 Speaker 25: position against the grant, and so
01:48:04 Speaker 26: it would actually allow us to
01:48:05 Speaker 26: bring the 2027 budget in at
01:48:07 Speaker 26: about 124,000, so a little bit
01:48:09 Speaker 26: less than we were anticipating, be
01:48:12 Speaker 26: able to bring this in. So
01:48:15 Speaker 26: we're seeking council's council county council
01:48:17 Speaker 26: support to to go for a.
01:48:21 Speaker 26: permanent role rather than a contract
01:48:22 Speaker 26: role to enable us to hopefully
01:48:26 Speaker 26: attract a better pool of candidates
01:48:28 Speaker 26: for the green development standard work
01:48:31 Speaker 26: over next next few months. And
01:48:36 Speaker 26: with that, Deputy Warden, I'm quite
01:48:37 Speaker 26: happy to take any questions. Very
01:48:40 Speaker 26: good, thank you, Sir. Are there
01:48:43 Speaker 26: any questions from Council? Not seeing
01:48:44 Speaker 26: any questions. I'll call the question.
01:48:46 Speaker 26: All those in favour? That is
01:48:50 Speaker 26: carried. Thank you, Sir. So with
01:48:53 Speaker 26: that, we. have finished our items
01:48:55 Speaker 26: that need direction beyond. So we'll
01:48:57 Speaker 26: go back to the pulled items
01:49:00 Speaker 26: from the consent agenda. The first
6.a Letter from the Honourable Minister Robert J. Flack - Community Benefits Charges and Parkland Regulation
Correspondence from Minister Robert J. Flack regarding community benefits charges and parkland regulation was received by Council to be reviewed. The legislation introduced through Bills 23 and 98 allows developers in Ontario to dedicate a broader range of lands, including privately owned public spaces known as POPS, which previously might have been ineligible for municipal acceptance. While the county does not directly handle parkland dedication, these changes could increase legal costs for nine-member municipalities if they are forced into agreements regarding encumbered or hazardous lands that developers wish to offload. The regulations further restrict eligibility by explicitly excluding contaminated and sensitive natural heritage sites from being proposed as parkland. Community benefit charges apply only to developments of five stories or greater exceeding ten residential units, a threshold not commonly met in most local municipalities.
01:49:03 Speaker 26: is six A, which is correspondence
01:49:06 Speaker 26: from the Honorable Minister Robert Flack.
01:49:09 Speaker 26: I forget who wanted to pull
01:49:12 Speaker 26: that, Councillor McKay. You'll move that
01:49:15 Speaker 26: to receive. Is there a seconder
01:49:19 Speaker 26: for that, Councillor Keaveny? Go ahead.
01:49:21 Speaker 26: Oh wait. Scott, you want to
01:49:23 Speaker 26: say anything regarding this item, or
01:49:24 Speaker 26: first, or just be available for
01:49:25 Speaker 26: questions? Okay, Councillor McKay, please. Thank
01:49:28 Speaker 26: you, Deputy Worden. I just want
01:49:29 Speaker 26: to get Scott's opinion on explaining
01:49:31 Speaker 26: a bit more about what's going
01:49:33 Speaker 26: on here. Whether we're going to
01:49:34 Speaker 26: lose municipality, will lose any of
01:49:36 Speaker 26: its parkland dedication? or funding that
01:49:39 Speaker 26: we do now get. So just
01:49:41 Speaker 26: to explain what's going on. Okay,
01:49:42 Speaker 26: Scott, do respond to that, please.
01:49:46 Speaker 26: Yeah, thank you, and through you
01:49:49 Speaker 26: to to Council McQuay. Thanks for
01:49:50 Speaker 26: the question. So this one is
01:49:52 Speaker 26: is a little bit complicated. Basically,
01:49:54 Speaker 26: what's happened is is a couple
01:49:57 Speaker 26: years ago through Bill Twenty Three,
01:49:59 Speaker 26: and again through Bill Ninety Eight,
01:50:02 Speaker 26: early. 98 earlier this year, the
01:50:03 Speaker 26: provinces made some changes with respect
01:50:06 Speaker 26: to parkland dedication in Ontario, and
01:50:07 Speaker 26: essentially what it does is allows
01:50:09 Speaker 26: for developers to dedicate a broader
01:50:11 Speaker 26: range of parkland to municipalities that,
01:50:14 Speaker 26: in some cases, perhaps in the
01:50:15 Speaker 26: past, municipalities would have been reticent
01:50:17 Speaker 26: to receive as parkland. So, some
01:50:19 Speaker 26: of those new changes that were
01:50:22 Speaker 26: passed through the legislation include allowing
01:50:23 Speaker 26: for developers to to use already
01:50:27 Speaker 26: encumbered land as parkland, privately owned
01:50:28 Speaker 26: public spaces as parkland, or what's
01:50:30 Speaker 26: the acronym on that one is
01:50:32 Speaker 26: is POPS, and and other lands
01:50:34 Speaker 26: that the developer may identify, and
01:50:37 Speaker 26: then so through the the recent
01:50:40 Speaker 26: regulations that have have now passed,
01:50:42 Speaker 26: it sets out criteria for
01:50:43 Speaker 26: for sort of how that parkland
01:50:46 Speaker 26: could get dedicated. The legislation also
01:50:50 Speaker 26: gave greater ability. for the the
01:50:52 Speaker 26: developer to appeal the decision of
01:50:53 Speaker 26: a municipality if they chose to
01:50:56 Speaker 26: say no to that parkland. So
01:50:58 Speaker 26: let's just say you were
01:51:01 Speaker 26: dealing with a subdivision application. The
01:51:03 Speaker 26: developer said, "Hey, we'd love to
01:51:06 Speaker 26: give you these lands in the
01:51:09 Speaker 26: northeast corner." And the municipality said,
01:51:10 Speaker 26: "Absolutely, we don't want those lands
01:51:13 Speaker 26: in the northeast corner." The developer
01:51:16 Speaker 26: could now appeal that that decision.
01:51:19 Speaker 26: So through the legislative changes, and
01:51:22 Speaker 26: then soon we'll get to the
01:51:24 Speaker 26: regulations. Apologize for jumping around here.
01:51:26 Speaker 26: Through the legislative changes, staff had
01:51:28 Speaker 26: flagged, and it doesn't impact the
01:51:30 Speaker 26: county as directly because we don't
01:51:31 Speaker 26: deal with parkland dedication. But it
01:51:33 Speaker 26: doesn't impact our nine-member municipalities. That
01:51:35 Speaker 26: you could end up with with
01:51:37 Speaker 26: higher legal costs in terms of
01:51:38 Speaker 26: the agreements that might be needed
01:51:40 Speaker 26: in terms of accepting some of
01:51:43 Speaker 26: these already encumbered lands, or you
01:51:45 Speaker 26: could end up with higher legal
01:51:47 Speaker 26: and administrative costs if you were
01:51:49 Speaker 26: in a situation where a developer
01:51:51 Speaker 26: was pushing. you know, that fictional
01:51:52 Speaker 26: lands in the northeast corner, and
01:51:55 Speaker 26: the municipality otherwise didn't want them,
01:52:01 Speaker 26: and it went to the the
01:52:03 Speaker 26: Ontario Land Tribunal, and then so
01:52:06 Speaker 16: fast forward to to the actual
01:52:10 Speaker 16: regulations, the regulations sort of further
01:52:12 Speaker 16: enshrined some of this. The one
01:52:16 Speaker 16: thing it it did do through
01:52:26 Speaker 16: the regulations was it gave a
01:52:27 Speaker 26: further list of lands that are
01:52:29 Speaker 26: otherwise ineligible, so the developer can't
01:52:33 Speaker 26: even propose these lands, and and
01:52:37 Speaker 26: that included some common sense things
01:52:42 Speaker 26: that municipality. Common sense things that
01:52:45 Speaker 26: municipalities typically wouldn't have taken anyway,
01:52:49 Speaker 26: things like contaminated lands, has hazard
01:52:50 Speaker 26: lands, certain sensitive natural heritage lands.
01:52:51 Speaker 26: In that regard, the final thing
01:52:54 Speaker 26: I'll say, then happy to take
01:52:56 Speaker 26: any questions, is the the the
01:52:57 Speaker 26: regulation also speaks to community benefit
01:52:59 Speaker 26: charges. Community benefit charges aren't something
01:53:01 Speaker 26: we've seen adopted in Gray County
01:53:04 Speaker 26: per se. They were a replacement
01:53:06 Speaker 26: of the former bonusing provisions under
01:53:09 Speaker 26: Section 37 of the Planning Act,
01:53:11 Speaker 26: but community benefit charges only apply
01:53:14 Speaker 26: to to developments of five stories
01:53:17 Speaker 26: or greater, which exceed ten or
01:53:17 Speaker 26: more residential units. So, generally speaking,
01:53:19 Speaker 26: for most of our municipalities, we
01:53:21 Speaker 26: don't have a lot of five-story
01:53:23 Speaker 26: or greater buildings. And and even
01:53:25 Speaker 26: in those municipalities, perhaps like City
01:53:27 Speaker 26: of Mount Sound, where we do
01:53:29 Speaker 26: have some, you know, maybe it
01:53:31 Speaker 26: wasn't worth the time and effort
01:53:32 Speaker 26: to to institute those community benefit
01:53:35 Speaker 26: charges. So, if anything, was more
01:53:37 Speaker 26: impact. If anything, what's more impactful
01:53:38 Speaker 26: to to the nine member municipalities
01:53:40 Speaker 26: is is the parkland dedication. But
01:53:44 Speaker 26: like I said, the the legislation
01:53:47 Speaker 26: was already passed, and and this
01:53:50 Speaker 26: is just sort of the implementation
01:53:52 Speaker 26: tool through the the regulations. But
01:53:56 Speaker 26: certainly happy to take any questions
01:53:57 Speaker 18: if there are any. Thank you,
01:54:01 Speaker 18: Scott. You good, Councillor? You have
01:54:04 Speaker 18: any further questions? No. Any other
01:54:07 Speaker 18: questions from any Councillor Dubrein? Please.
01:54:09 Speaker 18: Thank you, and through you. to
01:54:12 Speaker 18: Scott, if you could elaborate on
01:54:14 Speaker 18: how a developer could require a
01:54:20 Speaker 27: municipality to assume privately owned parkland,
01:54:21 Speaker 27: POPS. Sure, through you, and and
01:54:26 Speaker 27: thank you for the question, Councillor
01:54:27 Speaker 27: Debrine. I'm certainly not an expert
01:54:30 Speaker 27: on this. Typically speaking, in the
01:54:32 Speaker 27: past, these these pops, as as
01:54:36 Speaker 27: the acronym is, were often associated
01:54:38 Speaker 27: with with a condominium development, or
01:54:41 Speaker 27: in some cases, you picture a
01:54:43 Speaker 27: you know a large skyscraper in
01:54:45 Speaker 27: downtown Toronto where they might kind
01:54:48 Speaker 27: of have an outdoor plaza. Anybody
01:54:50 Speaker 27: from the public can come and
01:54:53 Speaker 27: you know sit by the fountain
01:54:56 Speaker 27: or have their lunch or whatever
01:54:57 Speaker 27: else. But it is technically private
01:55:01 Speaker 27: land, and and so essentially what
01:55:04 Speaker 27: this does is it. it gives
01:55:05 Speaker 27: my understanding is it gives more
01:55:08 Speaker 27: flexibility to count that privately land
01:55:11 Speaker 27: private land that's sort of in
01:55:12 Speaker 27: the public realm as as part
01:55:14 Speaker 27: of your parkland dedication per se.
01:55:17 Speaker 27: I don't I don't know that
01:55:19 Speaker 27: it's necessarily saying and again I'm
01:55:21 Speaker 27: not research this in great detail
01:55:24 Speaker 27: that it's necessarily saying that the
01:55:26 Speaker 27: municipality would assume ownership. It just
01:55:27 Speaker 27: means it it counts against your
01:55:29 Speaker 18: five percent total, so it brings
01:55:33 Speaker 18: down the developer's needs to either
01:55:36 Speaker 18: pay cash in lieu to the
01:55:38 Speaker 18: municipality. of Parkland or or dedicate
01:55:42 Speaker 18: land directly, but if it's something
01:55:44 Speaker 18: council is interested, I could do
01:55:47 Speaker 18: some more research and give a
01:55:49 Speaker 18: more fulsome, long-winded answer, but just
01:55:52 Speaker 18: not today. You're good. Okay. Any
01:55:56 Speaker 18: other questions? I'll call the question.
01:55:59 Speaker 18: All those in favor? That is
01:56:00 Speaker 18: carried. Moving on to six B.
6.b Correspondence from the Town of Halton Hills - Modernizing Ontario's Invasive Plant Rules
Councillor Carlton moved a resolution supported by Councillor Debrine to adopt correspondence from the Town of Halton Hills requesting stricter provincial rules on invasive plant sales.
01:56:01 Speaker 18: Correspondents from the town of Halton
01:56:02 Speaker 18: Hills. The recommendation is to this.
01:56:04 Speaker 18: Correspondence be supported by Gray County,
01:56:08 Speaker 27: Councillor Carlton. You'll move that. Thank
01:56:11 Speaker 27: you. Is there a seconder, Councillor
01:56:13 Speaker 27: Debrine? Scott, you just want to
01:56:15 Speaker 27: be available for questions, okay? Councillor
01:56:16 Speaker 27: Carlton, please. Thank you, Deputy Warden.
01:56:18 Speaker 27: The reason I asked to have
01:56:19 Speaker 27: this supported is I spend a
01:56:22 Speaker 27: lot of time in the spring
01:56:23 Speaker 27: visiting different plant pop up. Pop-up
01:56:24 Speaker 27: sales places, and I see all
01:56:26 Speaker 27: these invasive species still being sold.
01:56:28 Speaker 27: And I know that in Georgian
01:56:30 Speaker 27: Bluffs, last year we allocated twenty
01:56:32 Speaker 27: thousand dollars, ten thousand of that
01:56:35 Speaker 27: to be used to map the
01:56:37 Speaker 27: invasive species within the township, ten
01:56:40 Speaker 27: thousand dollars for eradication. We had
01:56:41 Speaker 27: another ten thousand dollars this year.
01:56:44 Speaker 27: I reached out to Gray Sable,
01:56:46 Speaker 27: and they are doing a lot
01:56:48 Speaker 27: of mature. Are doing a lot
01:56:50 Speaker 27: of removal there for wild chervil
01:56:51 Speaker 27: and fragmites. Georgian Bluffs, one of
01:56:53 Speaker 27: the issues that we have is
01:56:55 Speaker 27: with the giant hogweed. So there's
01:56:59 Speaker 27: a lot of money being spent,
01:57:01 Speaker 27: and I'm using the example of
01:57:03 Speaker 27: Grey Soblen, Georgian Bluffs. I would
01:57:05 Speaker 27: imagine every municipality throughout Ontario is
01:57:06 Speaker 27: facing that same thing. So I
01:57:08 Speaker 27: think we need support for that
01:57:09 Speaker 27: to get stricter rules in place
01:57:12 Speaker 27: around these plants being sold in
01:57:13 Speaker 27: the future. So I'm just asking
01:57:15 Speaker 27: for county council support there. Thank
01:57:19 Speaker 27: you. Thank you. Any other speakers?
01:57:21 Speaker 27: Questions? Not seeing any. I'll call
01:57:26 Speaker 27: the question. All those in favor?
01:57:31 Speaker 27: That's carried. Thank you. Moving on
01:57:33 Speaker 27: to six D, which is correspondence
6.d Correspondence from Lyssa Ireton - Grey Road 1 Concerns
The correspondence raised concerns regarding speeding and poor pavement markings along Grey Road One, suggesting the installation of black cat speed change indicators or radar trailers to alert drivers.
01:57:39 Speaker 28: from Liza Ireton. I think I
01:57:42 Speaker 28: said that right. Gray Road One
01:57:44 Speaker 28: concerns. Councilor Carlton, you're prepared to
01:57:45 Speaker 28: move that as well. Support. Seconder.
01:57:48 Speaker 28: Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Councillor Carlton.
01:57:50 Speaker 28: You wish to speak to it,
01:57:52 Speaker 28: or Pat? Do you want to
01:57:53 Speaker 28: speak first, or do you want
01:57:56 Speaker 28: to be available for questions? Questions,
01:57:59 Speaker 28: okay. Councillor Carlton. Thank you, Deputy
01:58:01 Speaker 28: Warden. Again, this one yesterday, I
01:58:02 Speaker 28: went for a drive to just
01:58:04 Speaker 28: see what the speed limits are,
01:58:05 Speaker 28: and is it is a sixty
01:58:07 Speaker 28: kilometer all the way through there?
01:58:08 Speaker 28: I know there is an issue
01:58:09 Speaker 28: with people speeding, and there are
01:58:12 Speaker 28: a lot of residents along the
01:58:15 Speaker 28: side. Now, the one thing I
01:58:17 Speaker 28: didn't notice was what are the
01:58:19 Speaker 28: pavement markings there. So, I guess
01:58:20 Speaker 28: what I'm asking is, could we
01:58:21 Speaker 28: take a look at that? Even
01:58:23 Speaker 28: some the black cat speed change,
01:58:25 Speaker 28: just to notify people you're going
01:58:26 Speaker 28: too fast, slow down because we're
01:58:28 Speaker 28: seeing so much of this near
01:58:30 Speaker 28: accidents with people driving so fast.
01:58:32 Speaker 28: And I'll use an example of
01:58:33 Speaker 28: recently. I was down to Markdale
01:58:34 Speaker 28: on a Sunday morning, and on
01:58:36 Speaker 28: the way down, and on the
01:58:39 Speaker 28: way back. both times I was
01:58:40 Speaker 28: passed by somebody when I was
01:58:42 Speaker 28: on a double line, and approaching
01:58:43 Speaker 28: a hill. So dangerous situations. And
01:58:45 Speaker 28: is there any way we can,
01:58:47 Speaker 28: I don't know, highlight this? And
01:58:48 Speaker 28: I think we're already doing what
01:58:50 Speaker 28: we can, but I didn't pay
01:58:52 Speaker 28: attention to pavement markings. So I'm
01:58:54 Speaker 28: just asking if somebody can speak
01:58:55 Speaker 28: to it, or if there's anything
01:58:57 Speaker 28: we can do to alert drivers
01:58:58 Speaker 28: to this. Thank you. I might
01:58:59 Speaker 28: think the obvious solution would be.
01:59:01 Speaker 28: that you guys. Did somebody say
01:59:03 Speaker 28: take it over? No, sorry, just
01:59:04 Speaker 28: just thinking out loud. Pat,
01:59:06 Speaker 28: do you want to speak to
01:59:08 Speaker 28: that, please? Yes, I guess first
01:59:09 Speaker 28: thing I'd like to thank Ms.
01:59:11 Speaker 28: Ireton for bringing this to our
01:59:12 Speaker 28: attention. We get requests like this
01:59:13 Speaker 28: pretty frequently, and I don't have.
01:59:17 Speaker 28: a data directly in that area
01:59:20 Speaker 28: on speed, but I I don't
01:59:21 Speaker 28: doubt she's correct. 99% of areas
01:59:23 Speaker 28: have speeding issues. People don't necessarily
01:59:25 Speaker 28: adhere to the signs. It is
01:59:29 Speaker 28: a 60 along there, but the
01:59:35 Speaker 18: visibility is quite good, so it's
01:59:37 Speaker 18: not a surprise that people are
01:59:41 Speaker 18: probably going faster than the posted
01:59:42 Speaker 18: speed. So what we typically do
01:59:43 Speaker 18: in a in a request like
01:59:45 Speaker 18: this is we would take up
01:59:47 Speaker 18: our our variable or our radar
01:59:50 Speaker 18: trailer that tells people how fast
01:59:51 Speaker 18: they're going. As far as that
01:59:53 Speaker 18: would give us just a little
01:59:57 Speaker 18: more thorough data, which I'm sure
01:59:59 Speaker 18: will save people from speeding. And
02:00:02 Speaker 18: as far as a permanent sign,
02:00:06 Speaker 20: I think the county has four
02:00:08 Speaker 20: now, but they've all been paid
02:00:09 Speaker 20: for by community groups. They're just
02:00:12 Speaker 20: so cost prohibitive. People tend to
02:00:19 Speaker 29: want them everywhere. I think the
02:00:21 Speaker 29: people that want them probably pay
02:00:22 Speaker 29: attention to the sign, but it
02:00:24 Speaker 29: seems like anordinate amount of people
02:00:26 Speaker 29: don't. So we would take
02:00:28 Speaker 29: our trailer up there, get some
02:00:30 Speaker 29: more speed. We would forward on
02:00:33 Speaker 29: the OPP about the enforcement piece,
02:00:35 Speaker 29: since that is not you know
02:00:36 Speaker 29: in our duty. You know, in
02:00:38 Speaker 29: our duties, and then we'd get
02:00:46 Speaker 29: a hold of Miss Ireton and
02:00:49 Speaker 29: see what she has to say.
02:00:52 Speaker 30: But again, even passing no passing
02:00:57 Speaker 30: zones, you know, in Ontario, you
02:00:58 Speaker 30: can you can pass, you know,
02:01:01 Speaker 30: against the line unless you have
02:01:02 Speaker 30: another bylaw. So we'll look into
02:01:05 Speaker 30: all the warrants in the area
02:01:06 Speaker 30: just to see there is paved
02:01:11 Speaker 30: shoulders there, which you know have
02:01:13 Speaker 30: a little more safety for cyclists
02:01:15 Speaker 30: and pedestrians theoretically than other places.
02:01:17 Speaker 29: But we'll have a look at
02:01:19 Speaker 29: it and talk to Miss Ireton
02:01:21 Speaker 29: and just get some more feedback
02:01:23 Speaker 29: on what we could possibly do
02:01:25 Speaker 29: there if anything. Thank you, Pat.
02:01:27 Speaker 29: Good. Any other questions on that
02:01:30 Speaker 29: one? Not seeing any. I call
02:01:31 Speaker 31: the question. All those in favor?
02:01:41 Speaker 20: That's carried. Thank you. Moving on
02:01:43 Speaker 20: to six E. Award of special
6.e CSR-CW-17-26 Award of Special Needs Resourcing
Councilor Eccles moved support for the Special Needs Resourcing Program award of $1.4 million in operational funding. This provincial funding is designed to stabilize and increase activities without impacting the existing budget.
02:01:44 Speaker 20: needs resourcing. Councilor Eccles, you're prepared
02:01:49 Speaker 20: to move support of that. Okay.
02:01:52 Speaker 20: Is there second, or Councilor Bordignon
02:01:56 Speaker 20: and Marie? Do you want to
02:01:58 Speaker 20: speak to that first, or all?
02:02:02 Speaker 20: Speak to that first, or oh,
02:02:03 Speaker 20: okay, Tara. Tara's going to speak
02:02:05 Speaker 20: to that. Excellent. The floor is
02:02:08 Speaker 20: yours, Tara. Welcome. Thank you. Good
02:02:10 Speaker 20: morning, Council Three Warden, or sorry,
02:02:15 Speaker 20: Deputy Warden. I'm happy to take
02:02:18 Speaker 20: any questions about this report. Very
02:02:20 Speaker 20: good. My kind of report. Councilor
02:02:22 Speaker 20: Ackles, did you have a specific
02:02:26 Speaker 20: question? Uh, yes. Through you to
02:02:30 Speaker 20: Tara. So the operational funding is
02:02:33 Speaker 20: 1.4 million. How much is that
02:02:35 Speaker 20: added on to our budget, or
02:02:38 Speaker 20: is To our budgeters, that flow
02:02:40 Speaker 20: through funding. Through Deputy Gordon, that
02:02:43 Speaker 20: is completely within our existing budget,
02:02:45 Speaker 20: so there's no impact. We have
02:02:48 Speaker 32: just had some savings in other
02:02:52 Speaker 32: budgets last year, so we prioritize
02:02:55 Speaker 32: supporting the special needs resourcing funding.
02:02:56 Speaker 32: So I believe this year was
02:02:59 Speaker 32: 1.2, based on community need. We
02:03:02 Speaker 32: had the surplus funding in our
02:03:03 Speaker 32: local priorities funding from the province
02:03:05 Speaker 32: to support this increase and go
02:03:07 Speaker 32: to the single source. So we've
02:03:08 Speaker 32: got a bit of a reserve
02:03:10 Speaker 32: to cover it for 2026 or
02:03:12 Speaker 32: 2027. Will that continue? 1.4 million
02:03:13 Speaker 32: is a fairly large. We've got
02:03:15 Speaker 32: some surpluses. I guess I thought
02:03:17 Speaker 32: was adding it. And how are
02:03:18 Speaker 32: we going to? Is it totally
02:03:19 Speaker 32: funded, or is it funded from
02:03:22 Speaker 32: the taxpayers of Gray County? Of
02:03:23 Speaker 32: Grey County. So this is completely
02:03:25 Speaker 32: funded through our provincial budget. We
02:03:28 Speaker 32: actually returned funds in 2025, and
02:03:31 Speaker 32: we would like to maximize our
02:03:34 Speaker 32: utilization of those provincial funds. So
02:03:35 Speaker 32: again, we haven't had to decrease
02:03:37 Speaker 32: any programming. This is just allowing
02:03:39 Speaker 32: us to stabilize and increase our
02:03:43 Speaker 32: activities through the Special Needs Resourcing
02:03:47 Speaker 32: Program as part of what we
02:03:49 Speaker 32: found through our review of the
02:03:50 Speaker 32: program. I think we just had
02:03:52 Speaker 32: a conversation a few minutes ago.
02:03:54 Speaker 32: It was a question from Councillor
02:03:59 Speaker 32: Debrine. This is absolutely written in
02:04:03 Speaker 32: stone that we'll continue to get
02:04:05 Speaker 29: these. I'm thinking a number of
02:04:07 Speaker 29: years ago we got into something
02:04:09 Speaker 29: called long-term care that was going
02:04:11 Speaker 29: to be totally funded. It wouldn't
02:04:15 Speaker 29: be on the taxpayers and. today,
02:04:18 Speaker 33: what north of nine million dollars
02:04:20 Speaker 33: of Gray County taxpayers' money that
02:04:22 Speaker 33: flows into that? No question, you
02:04:23 Speaker 33: know, it's it's a need, but
02:04:25 Speaker 33: it goes back to that philosophical:
02:04:28 Speaker 33: is it something that the property
02:04:30 Speaker 33: taxpayers need, and the thought of
02:04:32 Speaker 33: getting into it, and then ending
02:04:34 Speaker 33: up, no way of getting out
02:04:36 Speaker 33: of it, and continuously putting a
02:04:38 Speaker 33: burden on the rural taxpayers of
02:04:39 Speaker 33: Gray County. I can see that
02:04:41 Speaker 33: Miss Shaw has her hand waving
02:04:43 Speaker 33: over there, willing to jump in.
02:04:45 Speaker 33: Emory, you want to respond, please.
02:04:47 Speaker 33: Through you, Deputy Board. So special
02:04:49 Speaker 33: needs resourcing. So we have a
02:04:51 Speaker 33: number of children in our daycare
02:04:53 Speaker 33: centers, childcare centers that require assistance,
02:04:56 Speaker 33: and so we run a. program
02:04:59 Speaker 33: on behalf of the province in
02:05:01 Speaker 33: order to provide that assistance in
02:05:02 Speaker 33: the classroom for people for children
02:05:04 Speaker 33: with special needs. We've been doing
02:05:06 Speaker 33: it for years; it's not a
02:05:09 Speaker 33: new program. What we did do
02:05:12 Speaker 33: is we had a review done
02:05:15 Speaker 33: of the program to determine what
02:05:17 Speaker 33: where we were lacking, what we
02:05:20 Speaker 33: needed, and we know that there
02:05:23 Speaker 18: has been an increase in need.
02:05:24 Speaker 18: So we were able to, as
02:05:29 Speaker 18: Tara said, take some funding from
02:05:32 Speaker 18: other areas within our provincial budget
02:05:35 Speaker 18: or provincial funding and put it
02:05:40 Speaker 18: towards more towards. special needs, and
02:05:42 Speaker 18: then we were also, as part
02:05:44 Speaker 18: of the review, it was recommended
02:05:46 Speaker 18: that we go to one provider
02:05:53 Speaker 18: versus multiple, just for some consistency
02:05:54 Speaker 34: and some, you know, better outcomes.
02:05:58 Speaker 34: Hopefully, within it, so it's something
02:05:59 Speaker 34: that we are mandated to do,
02:06:01 Speaker 34: and it is part of our
02:06:06 Speaker 34: early learning and childcare services that
02:06:11 Speaker 34: we provide for Gray County. Thank
02:06:13 Speaker 34: you, Emory. Good. Oh, two. Good.
02:06:15 Speaker 34: Oh, Tara, go ahead. Just to
02:06:16 Speaker 34: add on to Ann Marie's comments
02:06:19 Speaker 34: as well, the contracts are annualized,
02:06:22 Speaker 34: so we do review our funding
02:06:23 Speaker 34: availability annually, and the service providers
02:06:27 Speaker 34: aware of that too. Very good,
02:06:31 Speaker 34: Councilor Gregg. Just want to thank
02:06:34 Speaker 34: Councilor Eccles for actually holding this
02:06:37 Speaker 34: item so that you could ask
02:06:41 Speaker 34: a question. This is in sitting
02:06:44 Speaker 34: on the Community Services Committee this
02:06:46 Speaker 34: year. This highlights a service. that
02:06:49 Speaker 34: the county provides that I didn't
02:06:50 Speaker 34: know anything about until sitting on
02:06:53 Speaker 34: community services. So this is a
02:06:57 Speaker 34: report here that I'm glad you
02:06:59 Speaker 34: pulled because it's a heightened opportunity
02:07:01 Speaker 34: for council to become more familiar
02:07:03 Speaker 34: with various levels of service that
02:07:07 Speaker 34: we provide, whether it's the tax
02:07:09 Speaker 34: levy or whether it's flow through
02:07:14 Speaker 34: provincial funding like this. But certainly,
02:07:16 Speaker 34: I've learned a lot just in
02:07:18 Speaker 34: the last couple meetings after going
02:07:19 Speaker 34: through a think a consultant in
02:07:22 Speaker 34: place to examine the service provision
02:07:26 Speaker 34: levels that we. were going with,
02:07:30 Speaker 34: and the opportunities for improvement. So,
02:07:33 Speaker 34: thanks for being able to speak
02:07:35 Speaker 34: to it today, Ter, and to
02:07:36 Speaker 34: Councilor Echoes for pulling it and
02:07:38 Speaker 34: heightened awareness of Council of the
02:07:39 Speaker 34: work that's done here. Thank you,
02:07:41 Speaker 34: Scott. Any other questions? I'll call
02:07:43 Speaker 34: the question. All those in favor?
02:07:46 Speaker 34: That is carried. Thank you. Moving
02:07:48 Speaker 34: on to the final poll item,
02:07:50 Speaker 34: which is six F. It is
02:07:52 Speaker 34: a report on Gray County Official
02:07:54 Speaker 34: Plan Amendment Thirty Two, Wilton Sanitation.
02:07:57 Speaker 34: Cassandra, Cassandra is here, Dilman, to
02:08:00 Speaker 34: speak to it. Councilor Ackles, you'll
02:08:03 Speaker 34: move. What is the recommendation? Be
02:08:05 Speaker 34: received for information. You're moving that.
02:08:07 Speaker 34: Is there a seconder, Councilor McQueen?
02:08:09 Speaker 34: Thank you, Cassandra. Please. Thank you,
02:08:11 Speaker 34: and I think it's afternoon. now,
02:08:19 Speaker 34: so I'll say good afternoon. As
02:08:21 Speaker 34: mentioned, my name is Cassandra Dolman,
02:08:25 Speaker 34: and I'm the county planner assigned
02:08:27 Speaker 34: to this file. OPA 32, Wilt
02:08:30 Speaker 34: and Sanitation. The lands are located
02:08:32 Speaker 34: on the north side of Gray
02:08:35 Speaker 34: Road 4. I think I might
02:08:38 Speaker 34: have the wrong property address, and
02:08:41 Speaker 35: there, apologies for that. The property
02:08:51 Speaker 34: is 33 hectares. The agent is
02:08:55 Speaker 34: Ron Davis. The agent is Ron
02:08:57 Speaker 34: Davidson, and that is the correct
02:09:00 Speaker 34: proposal. So apologies for that. So
02:09:02 Speaker 34: we are located approximately 650 meters
02:09:07 Speaker 34: west of Sealand, if that makes
02:09:09 Speaker 34: sense there. And the property, 33
02:09:12 Speaker 34: hectares, or about 81 acres in
6.f PDR-CW-29-26 Grey County Official Plan Amendment 32 - Wilton Sanitation
The applicant proposes a site-specific exemption to Grey County's Official Plan for their agricultural property at Wilton Sanitation, allowing an on-farm diversified use compared to the standard two percent limit.
02:09:21 Speaker 34: size. On the property, the there's
02:09:22 Speaker 34: a the applicant has their house
02:09:25 Speaker 34: and a detached garage, along with
02:09:28 Speaker 34: a workshop and the outdoor. storage
02:09:31 Speaker 34: area associated with the existing business
02:09:34 Speaker 34: on site, Wilton Sanitation. There's a
02:09:36 Speaker 34: buffer area of trees. It's a
02:09:38 Speaker 34: little hard to see here, but
02:09:42 Speaker 34: if you've driven past, there is
02:09:44 Speaker 34: a pretty thick mature trees that
02:09:47 Speaker 34: run along the entire property frontage
02:09:48 Speaker 20: of Great Road Court. I can
02:09:52 Speaker 20: also mention here that there was
02:09:54 Speaker 20: a local official plan amendment received
02:09:56 Speaker 20: and a zoning bylaw. amendment received
02:09:59 Speaker 20: by Grey Highlands, and there is
02:10:04 Speaker 20: a public planning meeting scheduled for
02:10:06 Speaker 20: the end of August. In terms
02:10:13 Speaker 20: of the site plan, so we
02:10:15 Speaker 20: have a couple different colors on
02:10:17 Speaker 20: the screen. I've tried to outline
02:10:20 Speaker 20: some of that on the side
02:10:24 Speaker 20: there. So there is in green;
02:10:26 Speaker 20: those are the agricultural uses currently
02:10:30 Speaker 20: on the site, and the lands
02:10:33 Speaker 20: are actively in cultivation. Then there
02:10:35 Speaker 20: is also And there is also
02:10:37 Speaker 20: that blue and orange area. So
02:10:40 Speaker 20: some of that being outdoor storage,
02:10:41 Speaker 20: and then the orange indoor storage.
02:10:48 Speaker 20: That's where the office and things
02:10:58 Speaker 34: like that are. Then there's also
02:11:00 Speaker 34: the pink, which that is the
02:11:04 Speaker 34: proposed expansion area. And I'll get
02:11:10 Speaker 34: into the details of that official
02:11:11 Speaker 34: plan amendment, but just to show
02:11:14 Speaker 34: you what's existing and the area
02:11:16 Speaker 34: that is proposed there. So, the
02:11:18 Speaker 34: proposed official plan amendment would facilitate
02:11:21 Speaker 34: the construction of a holding tank
02:11:24 Speaker 34: for hauled sewage and waste from
02:11:26 Speaker 34: septic system holding tanks, and it
02:11:31 Speaker 34: would recognize that existing on-farm business.
02:11:34 Speaker 34: So, the property is designated agricultural
02:11:35 Speaker 34: in the county official plan, and
02:11:37 Speaker 34: it the proposal is to add
02:11:39 Speaker 34: a site-specific exemption to that property.
02:11:42 Speaker 34: The property right now, an on-farm
02:11:45 Speaker 34: diversified use, is permitted to occupy
02:11:47 Speaker 34: up to two percent of that
02:11:53 Speaker 34: property size. So that's about that
02:11:55 Speaker 34: six thousand six hundred meters squared.
02:11:57 Speaker 34: Proposed is that eight thousand six
02:11:59 Speaker 34: hundred figure on the screen. So
02:12:01 Speaker 34: that's about two point six percent.
02:12:02 Speaker 34: 2.6% of the total property size.
02:12:05 Speaker 34: The wording of the official plan
02:12:10 Speaker 34: amendment, but I will just go
02:12:14 Speaker 34: forward to the recommendation. And at
02:12:18 Speaker 34: this stage, it is recommended to
02:12:21 Speaker 34: receive for information. Please let me
02:12:24 Speaker 34: know if you have any questions.
02:12:25 Speaker 06: Thank you, Cassandra. Councilor Nichols, your
02:12:28 Speaker 06: question or comments, please. It was
02:12:31 Speaker 06: a question. It's a question that
02:12:31 Speaker 06: was noted in here that, and
02:12:33 Speaker 06: I'm sorry I can't find the
02:12:34 Speaker 06: exact page right now. That the
02:12:37 Speaker 06: road allowance that goes off there,
02:12:38 Speaker 06: obviously at six corners, and the
02:12:41 Speaker 06: road allowance that goes north. That
02:12:44 Speaker 06: the applicant owned the road allowance,
02:12:47 Speaker 06: and I know that in Grey
02:12:49 Speaker 06: Highlands there was quite a. dispute
02:12:51 Speaker 06: on the road allowance and everything
02:12:52 Speaker 06: a little while ago with the
02:12:54 Speaker 06: applicant and a couple of other
02:12:57 Speaker 06: individuals on ownership, and and just
02:12:58 Speaker 06: that's what sparked my reasoning for
02:13:00 Speaker 06: this was who I will I
02:13:01 Speaker 06: will correct in determining that the
02:13:04 Speaker 06: road is owned by or the
02:13:06 Speaker 06: portion of the road that is
02:13:06 Speaker 06: following along on the Wilt. Along
02:13:09 Speaker 06: on the Wilton property on the
02:13:11 Speaker 06: west side is owned by the
02:13:13 Speaker 06: Wiltons. Has that been totally set
02:13:15 Speaker 06: aside, Sandra? Do you please? Did
02:13:16 Speaker 06: that? That sounds much better. There,
02:13:19 Speaker 06: the thank you for the the
02:13:22 Speaker 06: question there on. the the intersection
02:13:24 Speaker 06: that we're talking about, it's a
02:13:27 Speaker 06: little bit difficult when there is
02:13:29 Speaker 06: six corners. Is how the the
02:13:30 Speaker 06: prop how that intersection is known
02:13:32 Speaker 06: locally. There are five, but the
02:13:34 Speaker 06: six being this unopened road allowance.
02:13:35 Speaker 06: So if you can sort of
02:13:37 Speaker 06: take a line there through. I'm
02:13:38 Speaker 06: trying to orient myself here. Can
02:13:41 Speaker 06: anyone see? I can't even do
02:13:42 Speaker 06: this on my on. my mouse.
02:13:43 Speaker 06: There is a road allowance there
02:13:45 Speaker 06: on the west side of that
02:13:47 Speaker 06: entire property, going straight going north.
02:13:49 Speaker 06: As far as I understand, it
02:13:52 Speaker 06: is in the the same ownership.
02:13:54 Speaker 06: The Wiltons also own the lands
02:13:55 Speaker 06: to the to the west, so
02:13:59 Speaker 06: that entire parcel as well to
02:14:01 Speaker 06: the west. They have they have
02:14:02 Speaker 06: not, as I as far as
02:14:03 Speaker 06: I understand, merged on title, but.
02:14:06 Speaker 06: those two properties are separate. There.
02:14:07 Speaker 06: Let me let me zoom in.
02:14:08 Speaker 06: Then. Any other, Councillor McQueen. So
02:14:11 Speaker 06: thanks to you, Mister Deputy Warden,
02:14:12 Speaker 06: following up with Councillor Eccles. So
02:14:14 Speaker 06: there was a file that came
02:14:15 Speaker 06: to the Committee of Adjustment on
02:14:17 Speaker 06: the on the back portion road
02:14:20 Speaker 06: allowance. Should we slide it down
02:14:22 Speaker 06: a little bit? You see how
02:14:23 Speaker 06: the Down a little bit, you
02:14:27 Speaker 06: see how it goes further north.
02:14:29 Speaker 06: There's just a little strip, and
02:14:30 Speaker 06: that actually was that that road
02:14:34 Speaker 06: allowance is in private ownership. It's
02:14:36 Speaker 06: been sold a couple times, and
02:14:37 Speaker 06: then this previous owner was doing
02:14:40 Speaker 06: a minor variance to put a
02:14:41 Speaker 26: house. That that's beside the point.
02:14:44 Speaker 26: I sort of wonder though if
02:14:45 Speaker 26: the road allowance that goes beside
02:14:46 Speaker 26: Mr. Weldon is owned by him.
02:14:48 Speaker 26: I'm trying to go back to
02:14:49 Speaker 26: the file of the committee of
02:14:51 Speaker 26: adjustment to give me that information.
02:14:53 Speaker 26: I'm just trying to. search it,
02:14:55 Speaker 26: and but I so I find
02:14:57 Speaker 26: that I can't tell it because
02:14:59 Speaker 26: it would have been on the
02:15:00 Speaker 26: application of that particular road allowance.
02:15:03 Speaker 26: But I I sort of feel
02:15:05 Speaker 26: that it stops at the Wilton
02:15:07 Speaker 26: property because see what happened was
02:15:08 Speaker 26: back in Ardemisia days in 1975
02:15:09 Speaker 26: or thereabouts. Somehow in the wisdom
02:15:12 Speaker 26: of Ardemisia, they decided to deem
02:15:13 Speaker 26: that surplus and they sold it
02:15:15 Speaker 26: off, right? And so I I'm
02:15:18 Speaker 26: sort of thinking that that portion
02:15:20 Speaker 26: that. goes besides the lot and
02:15:23 Speaker 26: property is in their ownership, but
02:15:24 Speaker 26: like I said, I will do
02:15:27 Speaker 26: some time to do a bit
02:15:32 Speaker 18: of research on that file. I'm
02:15:34 Speaker 18: trying to think that committee adjustment
02:15:37 Speaker 18: file came up. I went through
02:15:40 Speaker 18: June. I went through July, so
02:15:42 Speaker 18: I'm just sort of going through
02:15:45 Speaker 18: that because if I could find
02:15:46 Speaker 18: that file, then it would tell
02:15:48 Speaker 18: exactly what the other piece was
02:15:49 Speaker 18: through the application through the committee
02:15:51 Speaker 18: adjustment for minor variance. So, so
02:15:54 Speaker 18: I can say at
02:15:57 Speaker 18: this point until I determine that,
02:16:00 Speaker 18: but. my my opinion is
02:16:02 Speaker 18: I think he probably
02:16:04 Speaker 18: owns it because it was deemed
02:16:06 Speaker 18: surplus, so it's not owned by
02:16:08 Speaker 18: the township or the municipality. I
02:16:11 Speaker 18: say township, I didn't mean at
02:16:13 Speaker 18: the time. They deemed it surplus,
02:16:16 Speaker 18: so so it's not the municipality. I guess the one in question is, and I don't think that actually, if I could find that application, it would it would determine how far that application was of that application for minor variance on the application of that road allowance that is north of. Mr. Wilton's property, but I can't determine that till I find that file. So, for the purposes of the application, I'm not sure it has any bearing who owns that unopened road allowance, does it? Scott, do you want to comment? I saw your hand there. Sorry, through you. I was just going to say that staff can do some more research into this and and get a more definitive answer. We'll work with Grayhound staff prior to bringing back a final report, as Cassandra said that the the landowner does own. sort of what you see on on the screen there, highlighted in teal, and the larger property to the west. If if if that road allowance was owned still by the municipality or someone else, then it might be more of an issue in terms of are there any of the the landowner's operations on that former road allowance? But we're happy to look into this further and bring it back. Okay, because the motion is just to receive for information at this point. Any other questions? Call the. question. All those in favor? That's carried. Thank you so much, everyone. So that concludes those. So we have the closed meeting matters. Lunch is going to be here at twelve fifteen. So no, no pressure. But we'll move her along here. So the motion is that the committee of the whole does now go into closed session pursuant section two three nine of the Municipal Act two thousand one as amended to discuss. advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, specifically legal advice on a bylaw, and two litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals affecting the municipality or local board, and this is specifically an OLT matter. Someone move that, Councillor Mackie, seconded by Councillor Pringle. All those in favor? That is carried. And I'm not sure what staff.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.