Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — July 23, 2026

Hook: Healthcare Connect Waitlist Cleared By Spring

Grey County · Committee of the Whole · July 23, 2026

Summary

Grey County’s Committee of the Whole reviewed primary-care access, paramedic-base financing, provincial planning rules, road safety, special-needs funding, and a site-specific agricultural land-use request. The meeting also included a separately announced Green Development Program staffing decision.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
Committee of the Whole
Date
July 23, 2026
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

Chair Paul McQueen called the July 23, 2026 meeting to order and confirmed no declared interests.

00:26:48 Speaker 01: call to order this committee. The

00:26:50 Speaker 01: whole meeting of July twenty third,

00:26:52 Speaker 01: twenty twenty six. At this point

00:26:53 Speaker 01: in time, I'll put out a

00:26:56 Speaker 01: call. Are there any declarations of

00:26:58 Speaker 01: interest? See no hands raised. Business

3 Business Arising from Minutes

No motions were raised regarding the minutes.

00:26:59 Speaker 01: arising for minutes. See no hands.

00:27:00 Speaker 01: We will move on to the

4.a The Grey Bruce Ontario Health Team - Lindsay Johnston, Executive Director

Executive Director Lindsay Johnston presented an update on the Grey Bruce Ontario Health Team's evolution toward hyper-local needs through collaborative agreements with primary care providers. A significant achievement involves clearing the Healthcare Connect waitlist for over 5,400 residents by spring 2026 via Interprofessional Care Team expansion proposals that fund salaried health human resources. However, infrastructure funding constraints currently limit local improvements due to a $100,000 cap preventing organizations from addressing needs in areas like Southgate.

00:27:02 Speaker 01: delegation. We have one delegation this

00:27:02 Speaker 01: morning. I would like to welcome

00:27:04 Speaker 01: Executive Director Lindsey Johnson. She will

00:27:13 Speaker 01: be providing us with this regular

00:27:15 Speaker 01: update. We look forward to it.

00:27:16 Speaker 01: Please come on up to the

00:27:18 Speaker 01: lectern, and I think they've they've

00:27:19 Speaker 01: given you the go-to on how

00:27:21 Speaker 01: to get that that microphone going.

00:27:23 Speaker 01: And what we'll do is, well,

00:27:24 Speaker 01: it'll either have to be your

00:27:26 Speaker 01: microphone or mine, back and forth,

00:27:28 Speaker 01: so that I can receive questions

00:27:32 Speaker 01: for you at the end of

00:27:35 Speaker 14: your presentation. So welcome. We're glad

00:27:38 Speaker 14: you're here. Thank you so much,

00:27:41 Speaker 14: Warden. So good morning, everyone, and

00:27:44 Speaker 14: thank you so much for having

00:27:48 Speaker 14: me here today to speak with

00:27:53 Speaker 14: you. I think I've had the

00:27:56 Speaker 14: opportunity to speak to many of

00:27:57 Speaker 14: you over the past couple years

00:28:00 Speaker 14: as I've been in the role

00:28:02 Speaker 14: of Executive Director of the Grey

00:28:04 Speaker 14: Bruce Ontario Health Team. I'm

00:28:09 Speaker 14: here to provide a brief update

00:28:12 Speaker 14: on some of the the work.

00:28:15 Speaker 14: that we've been doing over the

00:28:18 Speaker 14: past year, and part of this

00:28:21 Speaker 14: is the we've set up with

00:28:22 Speaker 14: the counties and the help of

00:28:28 Speaker 14: Randy and Christine in Bruce County

00:28:30 Speaker 14: a regular regular communication with the

00:28:31 Speaker 14: counties and municipalities over the course

00:28:35 Speaker 14: of the year. So I will

00:28:36 Speaker 14: aim to provide a delegation twice

00:28:39 Speaker 14: a year to both Gray County

00:28:41 Speaker 14: and Bruce. Years both Gray County

00:28:43 Speaker 14: and Bruce County, as well as

00:28:44 Speaker 14: provide continuous quarterly municipal updates, which

00:28:48 Speaker 14: I appreciate the spreading of those

00:28:51 Speaker 14: to your to your council members

00:28:54 Speaker 14: to provide more detailed updates about

00:28:57 Speaker 14: some of the progress and activities

00:28:58 Speaker 14: and initiatives of the Great Bruce

00:28:59 Speaker 14: OHD. So this this slide is

00:29:01 Speaker 14: not in your package, but it's

00:29:04 Speaker 14: one that I shared recently. at

00:29:08 Speaker 14: a a presentation to Bruce County,

00:29:12 Speaker 14: and I just wanted to share

00:29:13 Speaker 14: it as I give a bit

00:29:18 Speaker 14: of an introduction to to what

00:29:19 Speaker 14: OHTs are. And this is actually

00:29:22 Speaker 14: a diagram that one of my

00:29:24 Speaker 14: staff members put together of the

00:29:26 Speaker 14: Ontario healthcare system. And so, as

00:29:27 Speaker 14: you can see, extremely complex, many

00:29:29 Speaker 14: different levels, and over on I

00:29:33 Speaker 14: guess it's on the if you're

00:29:35 Speaker 14: looking at the screen, the right

00:29:38 Speaker 14: hand side. Looking at the screen,

00:29:40 Speaker 14: the right-hand side in the blue

00:29:44 Speaker 14: square—that's Ontario Health Teams. And so,

00:29:46 Speaker 14: Ontario Health Teams were actually started

00:29:48 Speaker 14: in, I think, it was 2019

00:29:50 Speaker 14: as the new way of organizing

00:29:51 Speaker 14: local healthcare. And the previous method

00:29:55 Speaker 14: of organizing healthcare, as many of

00:29:58 Speaker 14: you will probably remember, are the

00:30:01 Speaker 14: Linds. And there were, I think,

00:30:03 Speaker 14: there were maybe 11 Linds that

00:30:06 Speaker 14: kind of divided up the province

00:30:08 Speaker 14: of Ontario. and they were quite

00:30:12 Speaker 14: large. And the Grey Bruce was

00:30:17 Speaker 14: part of the Southwestland, which also

00:30:20 Speaker 14: included Elgin, Middlesex, London, Oxford. So

00:30:23 Speaker 14: a really large and very diverse

00:30:27 Speaker 14: area. And so the way that

00:30:30 Speaker 14: local healthcare and system level healthcare

00:30:32 Speaker 14: is being organized now is in

00:30:33 Speaker 14: the form of Ontario Health Teams,

00:30:35 Speaker 14: and there are actually fifty-eight Ontario

00:30:37 Speaker 14: Health Teams throughout Ontario at present,

00:30:39 Speaker 14: and they're with. And there, with

00:30:42 Speaker 14: these kind of a smaller focus

00:30:47 Speaker 14: on smaller regions, we're able to

00:30:50 Speaker 14: provide a more hyper-local look at

00:30:52 Speaker 14: the needs of a population of

00:30:55 Speaker 14: communities of the providers within a

00:30:57 Speaker 14: a smaller region, and really target

00:30:59 Speaker 14: initiatives and planning that will really

00:31:02 Speaker 14: help meet the needs locally as

00:31:04 Speaker 14: they as they shift and change

00:31:07 Speaker 14: as well. so the Gravers OHT

00:31:10 Speaker 14: has had an evolving structure over

00:31:13 Speaker 14: the past, at least the past

00:31:14 Speaker 14: three and a half years that

00:31:16 Speaker 14: I've been part of it, and

00:31:18 Speaker 14: most recently in this last fiscal

00:31:20 Speaker 14: year, we were able to really

00:31:22 Speaker 14: solidify our collaborative decision-making agreement and

00:31:25 Speaker 14: our our partnerships to form a

00:31:27 Speaker 14: structure that was able to leverage

00:31:32 Speaker 14: leadership from primary care providers, so.

00:31:33 Speaker 14: physicians and nurse practitioners, as well

00:31:35 Speaker 14: as health system leaders throughout all

00:31:37 Speaker 14: of Grey Bruce, so including primary

00:31:38 Speaker 14: care, acute care, mental health and

00:31:42 Speaker 14: addictions, and other levels of home

00:31:45 Speaker 14: and community care, and also involve

00:31:46 Speaker 14: community members, so patients, families, and

00:31:51 Speaker 14: caregivers, and kind of together, as

00:31:53 Speaker 14: you'll see in the center of

00:31:58 Speaker 14: the graphic, that makes up kind

00:32:01 Speaker 14: of the decision-making structure for the

00:32:05 Speaker 14: Grey Bruce Ontario Health team, and

00:32:06 Speaker 14: then we have even. larger networks

00:32:08 Speaker 14: of of partnerships, including those that

00:32:11 Speaker 14: we have with local counties and

00:32:13 Speaker 14: municipalities. So I know this looks

00:32:16 Speaker 14: a bit small on the slide,

00:32:19 Speaker 14: but hopefully you're able to to

00:32:22 Speaker 14: see it on your screen and

00:32:26 Speaker 14: in the slides that were shared.

00:32:30 Speaker 14: So our our strategic priorities are

00:32:32 Speaker 14: dictated by the province of Ontario,

00:32:33 Speaker 14: so the Ministry of Health and

00:32:35 Speaker 14: subsequently Ontario Health, and this. year,

00:32:39 Speaker 14: our strategic priorities focus on three

00:32:41 Speaker 14: different high-level priorities, which are primary

00:32:43 Speaker 14: care access and attachment, integrated clinical

00:32:45 Speaker 14: priorities, and OHT capacity building. And

00:32:48 Speaker 14: what I've done under each of

00:32:51 Speaker 14: these categories is list out the

00:32:54 Speaker 14: specific deliverables. What I really want

00:32:56 Speaker 14: to show by this graphic is

00:32:58 Speaker 14: the kind of the really strong

00:33:00 Speaker 14: attention that's being placed on. primary

00:33:02 Speaker 14: care access and attachment for OHTs,

00:33:06 Speaker 14: and the the focus of the

00:33:08 Speaker 14: province currently on this strategic priority.

00:33:12 Speaker 14: And what's listed in the in

00:33:13 Speaker 14: the small box is kind of

00:33:16 Speaker 14: at the bottom there. Those are

00:33:17 Speaker 14: our KPIs that are associated with

00:33:21 Speaker 14: each one of the strategic priorities.

00:33:24 Speaker 14: So those are the specific metrics

00:33:29 Speaker 14: that we are, as an Ontario

00:33:33 Speaker 14: Health team, being evaluated on. Valuated

00:33:37 Speaker 14: on, and we're being closely looked

00:33:39 Speaker 14: at by the province for us

00:33:45 Speaker 14: to to be successful. And you're

00:33:46 Speaker 14: no, you'll notice that attachment to

00:33:48 Speaker 14: a primary care provider is a

00:33:51 Speaker 14: key one there, as well as

00:33:53 Speaker 14: the drawdown of the Healthcare Connect

00:33:54 Speaker 14: waitlist. So focusing a bit more

00:33:56 Speaker 14: on those, the the primary care

00:33:58 Speaker 14: access and attachment, which is something

00:34:01 Speaker 14: that I know is of interest

00:34:04 Speaker 14: to all of you. plus many

00:34:06 Speaker 14: of those that that you serve,

00:34:08 Speaker 14: back in January 2025, the province

00:34:10 Speaker 14: made a commitment to attaching 100

00:34:13 Speaker 14: of Ontarians to primary care by

00:34:14 Speaker 14: 2029. Additionally, there was a a

00:34:16 Speaker 14: mandate to clear the Healthcare Connect

00:34:19 Speaker 14: waitlist, as it was January 1st,

00:34:21 Speaker 14: 2025, by spring 2026. which, as

00:34:22 Speaker 14: we all know, has passed. And

00:34:24 Speaker 14: and I will say that we

00:34:26 Speaker 14: were successful in doing that here

00:34:28 Speaker 14: in Gray Bruce. It took a

00:34:30 Speaker 14: lot of work by many of

00:34:32 Speaker 14: our partners and a lot of

00:34:34 Speaker 14: collaboration, but we were able to

00:34:39 Speaker 14: draw down from. It was just

00:34:41 Speaker 14: over 5,400 Gray Bruce residents on

00:34:44 Speaker 14: the healthcare connect list, and we

00:34:47 Speaker 14: were able to either attach them

00:34:51 Speaker 14: all to primary care locally, or

00:34:53 Speaker 14: if they had moved or had

00:34:57 Speaker 14: our Or if they had moved

00:35:00 Speaker 14: or had already been attached, clear

00:35:02 Speaker 14: them from that wait list,

00:35:04 Speaker 14: and we now have a list

00:35:08 Speaker 14: that you know is not like

00:35:11 Speaker 14: it used to be, where people

00:35:13 Speaker 14: would sign up and you know

00:35:16 Speaker 14: be waiting years to be attached.

00:35:19 Speaker 14: We are seeing kind of regular

00:35:22 Speaker 14: ebbs and flows and drawdown of

00:35:27 Speaker 14: that healthcare connect wait list as

00:35:31 Speaker 14: we attach more and more local

00:35:33 Speaker 14: residents to primary care. So I

00:35:36 Speaker 14: included this slide just so again

00:35:38 Speaker 14: you can see. the very strong

00:35:42 Speaker 14: focus. These are the the Ontario

00:35:45 Speaker 14: Health kind of KPIs and pillars

00:35:47 Speaker 14: of what they have really committed

00:35:51 Speaker 14: to do. And the mechanism for

00:35:53 Speaker 14: us locally to meet these specific

00:35:57 Speaker 14: KPIs and help the province achieve

00:36:00 Speaker 14: their goals is through an opportunity

00:36:04 Speaker 14: called Interprofessional Care Team (IPCT) expansion.

00:36:06 Speaker 14: So this is where Ontario. health

00:36:09 Speaker 14: teams and their associated primary care

00:36:12 Speaker 14: networks, which are the the network

00:36:15 Speaker 14: of local physicians and nurse practitioners

00:36:17 Speaker 14: that we have built relationships with,

00:36:24 Speaker 14: we're able to collaboratively put in

00:36:26 Speaker 14: proposals when their province to apply

00:36:27 Speaker 14: for funding to increase capacity and

00:36:30 Speaker 14: attachment to primary care, and so

00:36:35 Speaker 14: the way that this is structured

00:36:39 Speaker 14: is that. proposals can be put

00:36:40 Speaker 14: in for the expansion of current

00:36:44 Speaker 14: primary care organizations. So that includes

00:36:49 Speaker 14: family health teams and community health

00:36:51 Speaker 14: centers. And we're able to look

00:36:53 Speaker 14: at adding base funding for salaried

00:36:55 Speaker 14: health human resource positions to help

00:36:58 Speaker 14: increase capacity for the physicians to

00:36:59 Speaker 14: attach more patients. And this funding

00:37:02 Speaker 14: also helps us. increase the number

00:37:05 Speaker 14: of funded provincially funded positions for

00:37:06 Speaker 14: nurse practitioners, which are also able

00:37:08 Speaker 14: to increase capacity for attachment of

00:37:11 Speaker 14: the physicians, but also attach patients

00:37:14 Speaker 14: themselves. This is a slide that

00:37:16 Speaker 14: shows progress as of the end

00:37:18 Speaker 14: of February. I'm happy to report

00:37:20 Speaker 14: that I have very, very up-to-date

00:37:23 Speaker 14: data as of. Up to date

00:37:24 Speaker 14: data as of this morning. That

00:37:27 Speaker 14: this number actually. Let me get

00:37:28 Speaker 14: this here. So we actually have

00:37:30 Speaker 14: now attached over nine thousand local

00:37:33 Speaker 14: residents to primary care, so a

00:37:35 Speaker 14: physician or nurse practitioner, and we

00:37:39 Speaker 14: are now forty percent of the

00:37:42 Speaker 14: way there to our larger goal

00:37:48 Speaker 14: of attaching over twenty three and

00:37:51 Speaker 14: a half thousand Gray Bruce residents

00:37:53 Speaker 14: to primary care. That metric was.

00:37:56 Speaker 14: the metric the twenty three thousand

00:38:00 Speaker 14: five hundred and sixty two the

00:38:03 Speaker 14: metric that we were given January

00:38:05 Speaker 14: first twenty twenty five of how

00:38:07 Speaker 14: many unattached patients there were within

00:38:10 Speaker 14: our region, and so it's what

00:38:14 Speaker 14: we built a master plan a

00:38:18 Speaker 14: master attachment plan based off of,

00:38:20 Speaker 14: and when we did this last

00:38:22 Speaker 14: year with all of our partners

00:38:24 Speaker 14: it was estimated that we would

00:38:26 Speaker 14: require an additional eleven million dollars

00:38:28 Speaker 14: of base funding annually from the

00:38:30 Speaker 14: province, in. order to have enough

00:38:32 Speaker 14: capacity locally to have everyone attached

00:38:36 Speaker 14: to a physician or NP close

00:38:38 Speaker 14: to home, we have received as

00:38:41 Speaker 14: of this this April, so

00:38:43 Speaker 14: April twenty twenty six confirmation that

00:38:44 Speaker 14: we have as a region an

00:38:48 Speaker 14: additional seven million dollars of base

00:38:49 Speaker 14: funding locally, and our target for

00:38:52 Speaker 14: this year. specifically, is to attach

00:38:54 Speaker 14: an additional 9,000 Grey Bruce residents

00:38:56 Speaker 14: to primary care, and as of

00:38:58 Speaker 14: this morning, since April 1st, 2026,

00:39:00 Speaker 14: we've already attached almost 1,700 individuals

00:39:02 Speaker 14: to primary care. So we're 20%

00:39:05 Speaker 14: of the way towards that goal,

00:39:08 Speaker 14: and that goal, the target for

00:39:09 Speaker 14: that goal, has now been pushed

00:39:15 Speaker 14: a little bit to the end

00:39:16 Speaker 14: of June 2027, since the actual

00:39:18 Speaker 14: funds have not flowed yet. so

00:39:21 Speaker 14: we've been able to attach 1,700

00:39:23 Speaker 14: people already without actually that additional

00:39:25 Speaker 14: funding. Just with the

00:39:27 Speaker 14: promise of that funding coming,

00:39:30 Speaker 14: we are also anticipating two additional

00:39:33 Speaker 14: opportunities to apply for more funding

00:39:36 Speaker 14: for our region. We had estimated

00:39:38 Speaker 14: again that we probably need at

00:39:40 Speaker 14: least an additional four million dollars

00:39:41 Speaker 14: to attach everyone to primary care.

00:39:45 Speaker 14: That will likely shift with kind

00:39:46 Speaker 14: of population changes and as we

00:39:49 Speaker 14: engage partners. to understand a little

00:39:52 Speaker 14: bit better the specific needs of

00:39:55 Speaker 14: the individuals that remain unattached

00:39:58 Speaker 14: to primary care, but we do

00:40:02 Speaker 14: anticipate that there will be two

00:40:05 Speaker 14: more calls for proposals before 2029.

00:40:07 Speaker 14: That's all I have for you

00:40:09 Speaker 14: right now, based on on my

00:40:10 Speaker 01: slides and the time I was

00:40:12 Speaker 01: allotted. I I do want to

00:40:13 Speaker 01: say that I've had the opportunity

00:40:14 Speaker 01: to give quite a few presentations

00:40:17 Speaker 01: recently to. different municipalities and different

00:40:18 Speaker 01: groups from municipalities on primary care

00:40:22 Speaker 01: specifically, I have developed a very

00:40:23 Speaker 01: comprehensive primary care presentation that gets

00:40:25 Speaker 01: into a lot of the complexity

00:40:26 Speaker 01: of it, which I do think

00:40:29 Speaker 01: is very important for decision makers

00:40:31 Speaker 01: to understand. So, I would be

00:40:34 Speaker 01: more than happy to again speak

00:40:35 Speaker 01: to your council separately or answer

00:40:37 Speaker 01: any specific questions on the OHT

00:40:39 Speaker 01: on. primary care specifically, or upcoming

00:40:42 Speaker 01: funding opportunities. So, thank you. Thank

00:40:44 Speaker 01: you, Executive Director Johnson. It is

00:40:46 Speaker 01: very helpful, and we appreciate the

00:40:50 Speaker 01: fact that you've been able to

00:40:53 Speaker 01: distill it into something that that

00:40:55 Speaker 15: people can first of all have

00:40:59 Speaker 15: a look at, and then ask

00:41:01 Speaker 15: if they want to dig deeper.

00:41:03 Speaker 15: That's very helpful, and and certainly

00:41:04 Speaker 15: walking us through that first slide

00:41:06 Speaker 15: that you showed is is complex

00:41:09 Speaker 15: as things have been changing, and

00:41:12 Speaker 15: you are ever so. nimble to

00:41:13 Speaker 15: be able to adapt to the

00:41:15 Speaker 15: the new approaches, the new organization,

00:41:17 Speaker 15: and those are indeed some good

00:41:19 Speaker 15: celebratory numbers about attaching people to

00:41:21 Speaker 15: doctors where we need them here

00:41:24 Speaker 15: in the county. So, with that,

00:41:27 Speaker 15: we will go to questions. So,

00:41:29 Speaker 15: we'll start with the deputy warden.

00:41:32 Speaker 15: Thank you, Lindsay, for the the

00:41:34 Speaker 15: work that you do. It's important

00:41:37 Speaker 15: for all of the residents in

00:41:39 Speaker 15: Graveroos. Before I ask my question.

00:41:40 Speaker 15: I can't help but observe the

00:41:44 Speaker 15: irony of the present provincial government

00:41:46 Speaker 15: increasing the number of Ontario

00:41:47 Speaker 15: health teams from the number of

00:41:50 Speaker 15: limbs, and at the same time

00:41:51 Speaker 15: shrinking the number of conservation authorities.

00:42:00 Speaker 15: It's kind of ironic, nonetheless. Whatever,

00:42:02 Speaker 14: maybe they'll make their mind up

00:42:06 Speaker 14: eventually. What I'm what I'm curious

00:42:07 Speaker 14: to know is, given the tremendous

00:42:10 Speaker 14: growth in various parts of the

00:42:11 Speaker 14: of the county, and I'm thinking

00:42:14 Speaker 14: specifically of of Southgate and Dundalk

00:42:18 Speaker 14: in particular. where are the real

00:42:21 Speaker 14: pinch points in providing more

00:42:25 Speaker 14: healthcare to people? Is it physicians?

00:42:28 Speaker 14: Is it NPs? Is it physical

00:42:30 Speaker 14: space to look after the customers?

00:42:32 Speaker 14: Where are the pinch points, and

00:42:35 Speaker 14: how do we get how do

00:42:39 Speaker 14: we get a positive response from

00:42:41 Speaker 14: the Ministry of Health to the

00:42:42 Speaker 14: various suggestions that you know? I'm

00:42:44 Speaker 14: thinking of Southgate again. We've made

00:42:46 Speaker 14: different approaches to the provincial government,

00:42:50 Speaker 14: and we're getting zero. buy-in to

00:42:54 Speaker 14: this point. Where do we go

00:42:55 Speaker 14: from here? Please. Okay. Thank you

00:42:57 Speaker 14: very much for your for your

00:43:00 Speaker 14: question. And I think that all

00:43:02 Speaker 14: of the things that you mentioned

00:43:04 Speaker 14: are pinch points. So sorry that

00:43:05 Speaker 14: I'm not doing a great job

00:43:06 Speaker 14: answering that, but definitely the HHR.

00:43:09 Speaker 14: But I will say that. the

00:43:13 Speaker 14: anticipated constraints of having these additional

00:43:15 Speaker 14: positions funded and finding providers to

00:43:18 Speaker 14: fill them isn't as great as

00:43:22 Speaker 14: we anticipated. With a lot of

00:43:24 Speaker 14: the work that's been done throughout

00:43:28 Speaker 14: the province in increasing NP positions

00:43:32 Speaker 14: in different academic facilities, as well

00:43:34 Speaker 14: as even locally at Georgian, all

00:43:35 Speaker 14: the work that they've been doing

00:43:38 Speaker 14: to increase the number of like

00:43:41 Speaker 14: RN and RPN and MOA graduates,

00:43:43 Speaker 14: we're actually finding that the positions

00:43:48 Speaker 14: are being filled. In some areas,

00:43:50 Speaker 14: it takes more time, but we

00:43:52 Speaker 14: are able to find those individuals.

00:43:54 Speaker 14: Infrastructure is and continues to be

00:43:57 Speaker 14: likely the biggest constraint that we

00:44:00 Speaker 14: have. And I did have it

00:44:01 Speaker 14: in my slide, and I didn't

00:44:02 Speaker 14: actually talk to it, but the

00:44:04 Speaker 14: funding cap for one-time funding for

00:44:08 Speaker 14: any of these proposals is one

00:44:10 Speaker 14: hundred. Proposals is a hundred thousand

00:44:13 Speaker 14: dollars, so there is no opportunity

00:44:17 Speaker 14: as like as an OHT or

00:44:20 Speaker 14: as like primary care organizations to

00:44:21 Speaker 14: actually apply for any infrastructure funding,

00:44:24 Speaker 14: and so we have consistently asked

00:44:25 Speaker 14: the province like what what do

00:44:28 Speaker 14: you expect us to do then

00:44:29 Speaker 14: essentially, and there has been no

00:44:31 Speaker 14: answer to date unfortunately, and I

00:44:32 Speaker 14: think to your question about how

00:44:33 Speaker 14: to actually get some movement from

00:44:35 Speaker 14: the province in terms of you

00:44:36 Speaker 14: know infrastructure funding, and I know

00:44:39 Speaker 14: specifically the the issue in Southgate,

00:44:41 Speaker 14: I actually think it's it's alignment,

00:44:42 Speaker 14: and you know alignment on the

00:44:45 Speaker 14: understanding of you know where they're

00:44:48 Speaker 14: going and what they're trying to

00:44:51 Speaker 14: do, and then aligning the ask

00:44:54 Speaker 14: with that. And so, you know,

00:44:55 Speaker 14: to to just kind of summarize

00:44:58 Speaker 14: it to some degree in Southgate.

00:45:02 Speaker 14: if that infrastructure like is not

00:45:07 Speaker 14: there, like the services cannot be

00:45:09 Speaker 14: provided locally and close to home,

00:45:12 Speaker 14: so those unattached residents cannot be

00:45:14 Speaker 14: served close to home, which is

00:45:16 Speaker 16: what the commitment has been from

00:45:19 Speaker 16: the province. And so I think

00:45:24 Speaker 16: you know again, and I'm not

00:45:26 Speaker 16: super, I'm not exactly sure how

00:45:28 Speaker 16: to do it, but I think

00:45:31 Speaker 16: there's you know enough people to

00:45:34 Speaker 16: come together to figure it out.

00:45:38 Speaker 16: But I think it is you

00:45:40 Speaker 16: know you know collaborate. You know,

00:45:46 Speaker 16: collaborating like if there's a way

00:45:47 Speaker 16: for us to collaborate with you

00:45:50 Speaker 16: know counties, municipalities, the primary care

00:45:52 Speaker 16: leaders, and all align on you

00:45:55 Speaker 16: know the advocacy, I think that

00:45:56 Speaker 16: is the best approach, and hopefully

00:46:01 Speaker 16: one that will be effective.

00:46:05 Speaker 16: But truly, the mandate cannot be

00:46:07 Speaker 16: achieved if there's not that infrastructure

00:46:10 Speaker 16: to support it. Thank you. We'll

00:46:14 Speaker 16: go to Councillor Dobrin. Thank you.

00:46:16 Speaker 16: We'll go to Councillor Dobrine and

00:46:17 Speaker 16: then to Councillor Keen. Thank you.

00:46:20 Speaker 16: Good morning. Thank you, Warden, and

00:46:23 Speaker 16: through you, thank you, Deputy Warden,

00:46:25 Speaker 16: for the questions specifically about pinch

00:46:27 Speaker 16: points. There, we're hoping that we

00:46:31 Speaker 16: will have a delegation at AMO

00:46:33 Speaker 16: in August. We love for you

00:46:37 Speaker 16: to join us, but in the

00:46:40 Speaker 16: meantime, what I am hearing from

00:46:42 Speaker 16: residents, not specifically. to Southgate, but

00:46:45 Speaker 16: but residents is that they're still

00:46:47 Speaker 16: concerned about registering, I, because they

00:46:54 Speaker 16: don't want to take the risk

00:46:55 Speaker 16: of losing the physician, the primary

00:46:58 Speaker 16: care team that they have in

00:47:00 Speaker 14: place, and they're commuting hour and

00:47:03 Speaker 14: a half, two hours when they're

00:47:06 Speaker 14: unwell, and so the numbers while

00:47:08 Speaker 14: are great achievements. Congratulations, great work.

00:47:10 Speaker 14: but I don't think that they're

00:47:11 Speaker 14: reflective of our community's need or

00:47:13 Speaker 14: the lack of attachment. So, how

00:47:16 Speaker 14: do we? Perhaps we would love

00:47:18 Speaker 14: for you to come to our

00:47:20 Speaker 14: local council to share that. Perhaps

00:47:22 Speaker 14: we can elevate that the need.

00:47:24 Speaker 14: We have said on numerous occasions

00:47:26 Speaker 14: that you will not be detached

00:47:28 Speaker 14: from your primary healthcare provider if

00:47:31 Speaker 14: you register, and the importance. of

00:47:33 Speaker 14: registering. I'm just wondering how we

00:47:37 Speaker 14: can communicate that so that people

00:47:39 Speaker 14: actually do register. Because I think

00:47:41 Speaker 14: the number is significant. The number

00:47:43 Speaker 14: that you're working toward is not

00:47:46 Speaker 14: reflective of reality. Yeah, thank you.

00:47:48 Speaker 14: Thank you so much for that.

00:47:51 Speaker 14: And it was interesting. We were

00:47:53 Speaker 14: actually going through Healthcare Connect registration

00:47:55 Speaker 14: numbers today and noting. that

00:47:58 Speaker 14: Southgate was very low in registrants,

00:48:01 Speaker 14: and we were like just brainstorming

00:48:04 Speaker 14: how we could actually do that.

00:48:06 Speaker 14: And there is a lot of

00:48:09 Speaker 14: mistrust for the healthcare Connect system

00:48:10 Speaker 14: because, like, because of the history.

00:48:13 Speaker 14: And you know, people had been

00:48:16 Speaker 14: on it for years. Don't think

00:48:21 Speaker 14: that it works very well. And

00:48:23 Speaker 14: yeah, up until I think last

00:48:26 Speaker 14: fall, you would be de rostered

00:48:28 Speaker 14: from your provider if you and

00:48:29 Speaker 14: and you know, people really like

00:48:31 Speaker 14: that. Really like that's not something

00:48:33 Speaker 14: that anybody wants to do. So

00:48:34 Speaker 14: I I think that you know

00:48:36 Speaker 14: I would welcome the opportunity to

00:48:38 Speaker 14: come and speak to people. I

00:48:39 Speaker 14: think also leveraging the CHC and

00:48:41 Speaker 14: its trust in the community. I

00:48:44 Speaker 14: know there's a lot of individuals,

00:48:45 Speaker 14: especially in Southgate, that are accessing

00:48:48 Speaker 14: CHC services, but they may be

00:48:51 Speaker 14: attached to primary care elsewhere. So

00:48:56 Speaker 14: perhaps leveraging the relationships like with

00:48:57 Speaker 14: a trusted organization, and with this

00:48:59 Speaker 14: new funding, the CHC actually will

00:49:01 Speaker 14: be rostering a significant number of

00:49:03 Speaker 01: people in addition to what they

00:49:05 Speaker 01: have right now. So perhaps just

00:49:08 Speaker 01: seeing that will entice some other

00:49:10 Speaker 01: people to to register. That just

00:49:12 Speaker 01: hasn't the movement hasn't been there

00:49:14 Speaker 01: yet because the funding hasn't flowed

00:49:15 Speaker 01: for this year. So I think

00:49:17 Speaker 01: yeah, any you know anything that

00:49:18 Speaker 11: So anything that we can do

00:49:20 Speaker 11: to help kind of build not

00:49:21 Speaker 11: only the trust in healthcare connected

00:49:22 Speaker 11: itself, but in like the system

00:49:23 Speaker 11: and where it's going, and perhaps

00:49:27 Speaker 11: it is sharing some of these

00:49:28 Speaker 11: things, right? To of you know

00:49:29 Speaker 11: the drawdown we've been able to

00:49:31 Speaker 11: achieve, the increased attachment, and that

00:49:33 Speaker 11: confidence that you know people aren't

00:49:36 Speaker 11: going to be left without a

00:49:39 Speaker 11: provider if they do get on

00:49:42 Speaker 11: the the healthcare connect system. Okay,

00:49:45 Speaker 11: thank you. And anything that we

00:49:47 Speaker 11: can do. to help with that

00:49:49 Speaker 11: education to get that message out

00:49:53 Speaker 11: because it is a fairly recent

00:49:55 Speaker 11: change, given as you mentioned the

00:49:57 Speaker 11: history, so that people need to

00:49:59 Speaker 11: trust the new rules. So, okay,

00:50:01 Speaker 11: we're going to go to Councillor

00:50:04 Speaker 11: Keaveny next. Thank you, Madam Warden,

00:50:06 Speaker 11: and Lindsay. I really appreciate you

00:50:08 Speaker 11: being here today, and would extend

00:50:10 Speaker 11: an invitation to you to come

00:50:12 Speaker 11: to speak to me for it

00:50:17 Speaker 14: as well. I just wanted to

00:50:20 Speaker 14: share that we have one new

00:50:23 Speaker 14: doctor in Meaford and two more

00:50:25 Speaker 14: coming. So, thank you for your

00:50:26 Speaker 14: participating. participation in that, and I

00:50:29 Speaker 14: just wanted to ask to pick

00:50:31 Speaker 14: your brain a little bit in

00:50:34 Speaker 14: terms of advice for municipalities, because

00:50:39 Speaker 14: I think through your response to

00:50:41 Speaker 14: Deputy Warden Mill, I'm hearing that

00:50:44 Speaker 14: infrastructure office space for doctors is

00:50:46 Speaker 14: is a key concern. So perhaps

00:50:49 Speaker 14: if municipalities gave thought to moving

00:50:51 Speaker 14: away from the Hunger Games of

00:50:53 Speaker 14: doctor incentives and focused more on

00:50:56 Speaker 14: providing space for new potential doctors.

00:50:59 Speaker 14: would. Would that be your recommendation

00:51:02 Speaker 14: as the key thing that municipalities

00:51:03 Speaker 14: could do? I mean, in Mefford,

00:51:06 Speaker 14: we now offer one hundred thousand

00:51:09 Speaker 14: dollars at one percent interest loan

00:51:10 Speaker 14: from the municipality to support doctors

00:51:15 Speaker 14: with space. But just wanted to,

00:51:16 Speaker 14: as I say, get your thoughts

00:51:17 Speaker 14: on other areas of advice for

00:51:19 Speaker 14: municipalities to participate. Thank you very

00:51:20 Speaker 14: much. Yes, I think that that

00:51:24 Speaker 14: is it. I. I do um

00:51:29 Speaker 14: yeah I think it's great to

00:51:31 Speaker 14: kind of look at that and

00:51:33 Speaker 14: reevaluate based on the new context

00:51:34 Speaker 14: where we are now and and

00:51:38 Speaker 14: shifting away potentially from, um, you

00:51:40 Speaker 14: know some of the um

00:51:43 Speaker 14: recruitment um focus and towards kind

00:51:45 Speaker 14: of the areas where um the

00:51:46 Speaker 14: system that the system can't support

00:51:47 Speaker 14: right now which is the infrastructure

00:51:50 Speaker 14: um I know with um something

00:51:55 Speaker 14: that is. we recently did some

00:51:58 Speaker 14: work with the South Bruce Peninsula,

00:52:01 Speaker 14: and this this new funding for

00:52:02 Speaker 14: every new position that is funding,

00:52:06 Speaker 14: it does also fund twenty five

00:52:09 Speaker 14: percent in terms of offer operational

00:52:12 Speaker 14: costs. So you know municipalities, if

00:52:14 Speaker 14: they're in a position that they

00:52:15 Speaker 14: may be able to kind of

00:52:18 Speaker 14: support the kind of, and again,

00:52:21 Speaker 14: I'm probably not going to say

00:52:23 Speaker 14: this right, but the leasing of

00:52:27 Speaker 14: a space or you know, they

00:52:30 Speaker 14: have a space to provide those

00:52:32 Speaker 14: operational funds. Are kind of committed

00:52:35 Speaker 14: to that, like the rent or

00:52:37 Speaker 14: whatever that is. So, if a

00:52:39 Speaker 14: town owns the building and they're

00:52:41 Speaker 14: renting it to a primary care

00:52:46 Speaker 14: organization, you know, there's that kind

00:52:52 Speaker 14: of commitment that with those additional

00:52:56 Speaker 14: positions, that operational funding comes along.

00:52:58 Speaker 08: So, we were able to do

00:53:00 Speaker 08: a bit of a business case,

00:53:02 Speaker 08: like with the South Bruce. Peninsula,

00:53:04 Speaker 08: to help the the physicians there,

00:53:06 Speaker 08: kind of get the support for

00:53:07 Speaker 08: moving into a new space. With

00:53:09 Speaker 08: them knowing that there was this

00:53:13 Speaker 08: confirmed, like there would be kind

00:53:14 Speaker 08: of confirmed funding to support the

00:53:15 Speaker 08: the rent of the additional space.

00:53:17 Speaker 08: So I think, like, kind of

00:53:19 Speaker 08: if there is opportunity to look

00:53:21 Speaker 08: at, you know, spaces that the

00:53:23 Speaker 08: municipalities may own or potential to

00:53:24 Speaker 08: support, like new spaces or leasehold

00:53:28 Speaker 08: improvements. I think that's a great

00:53:29 Speaker 08: opportunity to to explore. And again,

00:53:31 Speaker 08: it it likely will be. You

00:53:34 Speaker 08: know things will take time to

00:53:35 Speaker 08: to shift and change, but just

00:53:37 Speaker 08: being kind of open to understanding

00:53:40 Speaker 08: what this new kind of funding

00:53:43 Speaker 08: and these new structures look like,

00:53:44 Speaker 08: and how that potentially changes needs.

00:53:46 Speaker 08: for for primary care. Okay, thank

00:53:49 Speaker 08: you. We'll go to Councillor Greg.

00:53:51 Speaker 08: Thank you for the presentation this

00:53:53 Speaker 08: afternoon, Lindsay. And thanks, probably, for

00:53:54 Speaker 08: not including that complex or that

00:53:58 Speaker 08: slide that shows the complexities of

00:54:00 Speaker 08: navigating the Ministry of Health. The

00:54:03 Speaker 08: flip side of that is, I

00:54:05 Speaker 08: do have a couple questions, just

00:54:07 Speaker 08: for a little bit more framing

00:54:08 Speaker 08: around the the value. The the

00:54:11 Speaker 08: values that are in place right

00:54:13 Speaker 08: now, like to say seven million

00:54:16 Speaker 08: dollars in base funding increase since

00:54:18 Speaker 08: August twenty twenty five. What's that

00:54:20 Speaker 08: up against? Like, what what does

00:54:22 Speaker 08: seven million dollars increase in base

00:54:25 Speaker 08: funding mean? I I have no

00:54:33 Speaker 08: idea what your your starting point

00:54:36 Speaker 08: was. Because I was going to

00:54:38 Speaker 08: ask the question like, how much

00:54:40 Speaker 08: funding did each FHT get? Is

00:54:42 Speaker 08: that something you know, or is

00:54:44 Speaker 08: that some are details like that

00:54:46 Speaker 08: that you can report in an

00:54:49 Speaker 08: email back to council just because.

00:54:52 Speaker 08: I'm, yes, we're representing the county,

00:54:53 Speaker 08: but I'm most familiar with Owen

00:54:55 Speaker 08: Sounds Family Health Teams, and I

00:54:57 Speaker 08: can't help but wonder how many

00:54:58 Speaker 08: people were actually connected with a

00:55:01 Speaker 08: doctor at each FHT. Like, is

00:55:04 Speaker 08: there a resource where we can

00:55:08 Speaker 08: locate that information? The third question

00:55:10 Speaker 08: I would ask is: You mentioned

00:55:12 Speaker 08: over nine thousand attached to primary

00:55:14 Speaker 08: care, which was up from about

00:55:16 Speaker 08: seventy-three hundred in the one slide,

00:55:18 Speaker 08: and that was as of this

00:55:19 Speaker 08: morning. seventeen hundred as of April

00:55:21 Speaker 08: was a number you utilized. Is

00:55:23 Speaker 08: that the same number? That seventeen

00:55:24 Speaker 08: hundred increase as of April is

00:55:28 Speaker 08: that what drove it up to

00:55:29 Speaker 14: nine thousand? As of that information

00:55:32 Speaker 14: this morning, okay. I just when

00:55:34 Speaker 14: a doctor may retire, individuals that

00:55:36 Speaker 14: may be at risk of being

00:55:38 Speaker 14: de-registered or or needing to find

00:55:39 Speaker 14: another physician, they're not counted twice,

00:55:41 Speaker 14: are they? Like, just if you

00:55:43 Speaker 14: could explain in terms of that

00:55:46 Speaker 14: process to me, and and I'm

00:55:48 Speaker 14: glad for Councillor Millen's question or

00:55:52 Speaker 14: Councillor Debrine's question. I, I'm concerned

00:55:54 Speaker 14: that there is a lot of

00:55:56 Speaker 14: gap out there because I think

00:55:57 Speaker 14: the old list or a new

00:56:02 Speaker 14: list was started in January of

00:56:04 Speaker 14: 25, and you as you commented,

00:56:05 Speaker 14: changes were made last fall, and

00:56:06 Speaker 14: your And you're working with a

00:56:08 Speaker 14: list that's somewhat dated and more

00:56:10 Speaker 14: reflective of people that were hesitant

00:56:15 Speaker 14: to to put their name forward

00:56:16 Speaker 14: at the risk of losing their

00:56:18 Speaker 14: their primary care provider at the

00:56:25 Speaker 14: time. So, a couple questions that

00:56:28 Speaker 14: if you're able to guide me

00:56:30 Speaker 14: to where I can find those

00:56:32 Speaker 14: resources, or perhaps further them back

00:56:35 Speaker 14: to counsel in the future. Thanks.

00:56:41 Speaker 14: Yeah, for sure. I'll do my

00:56:45 Speaker 14: best to answer as much of

00:56:49 Speaker 14: that as I can. I also

00:56:51 Speaker 14: when I when I do that

00:56:52 Speaker 14: more in depth presentation that I've

00:56:56 Speaker 14: developed, a lot of that is

00:56:58 Speaker 14: answered, and I think, you know,

00:57:01 Speaker 14: as you noted at the very

00:57:04 Speaker 14: beginning, that like this system is

00:57:08 Speaker 14: probably the most complex I've ever

00:57:14 Speaker 14: encountered in systems, and it is

00:57:15 Speaker 14: not logical and it's not straightforward,

00:57:17 Speaker 14: and so it makes answering a

00:57:21 Speaker 14: lot of these questions and understanding

00:57:24 Speaker 14: it all like very difficult. But

00:57:28 Speaker 14: in terms of just going back.

00:57:33 Speaker 14: to, and I'm going to try

00:57:35 Speaker 14: to remember this properly, the first

00:57:40 Speaker 14: that you asked about the amount

00:57:43 Speaker 14: of funding and the attachments at

00:57:46 Speaker 14: each organization. So, the first round

00:57:49 Speaker 14: of funding was a bit different.

00:57:50 Speaker 14: There were regions because of the

00:57:52 Speaker 14: way that they structured it that

00:57:56 Speaker 14: were eligible to apply for funding.

00:57:57 Speaker 14: The first round was specific to

00:57:58 Speaker 14: postal codes, so the N0H and

00:57:59 Speaker 14: N. The N zero H and

00:58:00 Speaker 14: N zero G postal code were

00:58:01 Speaker 14: eligible to submit proposals, and other

00:58:03 Speaker 14: regions were not eligible. And we

00:58:05 Speaker 14: had immense difficulty here because, unlike

00:58:07 Speaker 14: many urban centers, we have huge

00:58:12 Speaker 14: FSA's. Like N zero H is

00:58:13 Speaker 14: the peninsula; it's part of the

00:58:14 Speaker 14: Blue Mountains. It's like you know,

00:58:16 Speaker 14: it's a huge Soggy Shores, and

00:58:17 Speaker 14: Slogging shores, and so we put

00:58:21 Speaker 14: together proposals for that, and the

00:58:25 Speaker 14: funding, like the asks, were constructed

00:58:27 Speaker 14: by, like they were based on

00:58:32 Speaker 14: data, so data that showed us

00:58:39 Speaker 14: how many unattached patients there were,

00:58:41 Speaker 14: and also what the organizations themselves,

00:58:43 Speaker 14: so the the family health teams,

00:58:45 Speaker 14: what they saw as feasible, within

00:58:47 Speaker 14: a year to recruit in terms

00:58:51 Speaker 14: of like the staffing and also

00:58:55 Speaker 14: onboard and attach. So the we

00:59:00 Speaker 14: had to submit both an ask

00:59:02 Speaker 14: and the proposed target attachment. And

00:59:05 Speaker 14: then what happens? And I don't

00:59:07 Speaker 14: know if this happens in other

00:59:08 Speaker 14: areas when you put a proposal

00:59:10 Speaker 14: into the province. You ask for

00:59:12 Speaker 14: something and say this is what

00:59:15 Speaker 14: we're going to do, and they

00:59:17 Speaker 14: come back and say, actually, we're

00:59:20 Speaker 14: going to give you twenty percent

00:59:21 Speaker 14: of what you asked for, and

00:59:23 Speaker 14: this is now your target, which

00:59:26 Speaker 14: is like half of what you

00:59:27 Speaker 14: said you could do. Yeah, so

00:59:29 Speaker 14: that's kind of like that's what

00:59:31 Speaker 14: we ended up with. So we

00:59:32 Speaker 14: ended up in the first round

00:59:33 Speaker 14: getting, I think, I want to

00:59:35 Speaker 14: say two and a half million

00:59:37 Speaker 14: to attach about twenty five hundred

00:59:39 Speaker 14: people, and what they ended up

00:59:40 Speaker 14: coming. out with a bit later

00:59:42 Speaker 14: is targets aligned to specific positions.

00:59:46 Speaker 14: So, a nurse practitioner. If I

00:59:49 Speaker 14: was going to, let's say, I'm

00:59:51 Speaker 14: a primary care organization, I'm applying

00:59:53 Speaker 14: for a nurse practitioner position. The

00:59:57 Speaker 14: funding for it that comes along

00:59:59 Speaker 14: with a target of 800 patients.

01:00:02 Speaker 14: So, and then a. another health

01:00:06 Speaker 14: service provider, let's say like a

01:00:08 Speaker 14: social worker, that number is 250.

01:00:11 Speaker 14: Okay, so let's say I'm an

01:00:14 Speaker 14: organization. I ask for a nurse

01:00:18 Speaker 14: practitioner funding for a nurse practitioner

01:00:21 Speaker 14: and a social worker. My target

01:00:23 Speaker 14: then has to be 1,050 patients.

01:00:25 Speaker 14: So that's kind of how it

01:00:28 Speaker 14: works right now. We all know

01:00:33 Speaker 14: in like that's not actually how

01:00:37 Speaker 14: it works in any way, but

01:00:40 Speaker 14: that's how the funding is being.

01:00:43 Speaker 14: allocated, but it also has to

01:00:45 Speaker 14: be thought of in okay, like

01:00:46 Speaker 14: if I'm, you know, the executive

01:00:49 Speaker 14: director of an organization, what is

01:00:55 Speaker 14: possible for me to do in

01:00:57 Speaker 14: one year? Do I have space

01:00:59 Speaker 14: to bring these people on? Do

01:01:01 Speaker 14: I think I can actually hire

01:01:03 Speaker 14: a nurse practitioner in a year

01:01:09 Speaker 14: to meet that target? Because that's

01:01:12 Speaker 14: what I'm going to be accountable

01:01:14 Speaker 14: for. So, the um, you know,

01:01:16 Speaker 14: the numbers again, and the so

01:01:19 Speaker 14: the organizations that received funding in

01:01:22 Speaker 14: that. first round were Kingardon Family

01:01:24 Speaker 14: Health Team and the Brockton and

01:01:29 Speaker 14: Area Family Health Team, but the

01:01:31 Speaker 14: Kingardon Family Health Team, their funding

01:01:41 Speaker 14: actually went to support physician groups

01:01:42 Speaker 14: in Soggin Shores, so two of

01:01:45 Speaker 08: them, as well as the Meaford

01:01:46 Speaker 08: Thornbury and Fleischerton physician group. So

01:01:48 Speaker 08: it really was like, you know,

01:01:51 Speaker 08: quite complex in terms. of where

01:01:54 Speaker 14: funding flowed because of where it

01:01:58 Speaker 14: could only flow and where that

01:02:01 Speaker 14: money actually went to support attachment.

01:02:02 Speaker 14: So, the numbers, like we have

01:02:04 Speaker 14: them, whether they give you a

01:02:06 Speaker 14: lot of information that is helpful,

01:02:09 Speaker 14: I'm not sure. But that is

01:02:10 Speaker 14: kind of you know what we're

01:02:13 Speaker 14: working with and the targets this

01:02:15 Speaker 14: time around. So actually, every every

01:02:18 Speaker 14: primary care organization and physician group

01:02:20 Speaker 14: in the entire region was involved

01:02:21 Speaker 14: in our second proposal that we

01:02:24 Speaker 14: put in last November, and that

01:02:27 Speaker 14: was approved in April of this

01:02:30 Speaker 14: year. And so, all organizations have

01:02:32 Speaker 14: targets that are aligned with the

01:02:35 Speaker 14: amount of funding, which align with

01:02:36 Speaker 14: the the like eight hundred and

01:02:38 Speaker 14: two fifty that. that I was

01:02:40 Speaker 14: was speaking to, so that's the

01:02:43 Speaker 14: way that we kind of sorted

01:02:47 Speaker 14: it out. So I hope that

01:02:50 Speaker 14: sorry, it's really really difficult to

01:02:51 Speaker 14: explain, but yeah. Thank you for

01:02:53 Speaker 14: that. And just the last piece

01:02:56 Speaker 14: was patients who could be at

01:02:59 Speaker 14: risk of de rostering. How Risk

01:03:06 Speaker 14: of de-rostering? How's how's the counting

01:03:10 Speaker 01: process there? Just to ensure there's

01:03:12 Speaker 01: no double counting. Yeah. So the

01:03:13 Speaker 01: way that the numbers are counted

01:03:14 Speaker 01: for this funding is that when

01:03:15 Speaker 01: they establish like the start of

01:03:17 Speaker 01: the funding. So for this second

01:03:19 Speaker 01: round of funding, the start was

01:03:21 Speaker 01: April first, twenty twenty six. And

01:03:23 Speaker 01: so what each organization has to

01:03:24 Speaker 01: do is take their baseline roster.

01:03:25 Speaker 01: So let's say, Owen Sand Family

01:03:29 Speaker 01: Health Team. thirty thousand, let's say,

01:03:30 Speaker 01: and then any like you have

01:03:31 Speaker 01: a target of okay, your target

01:03:32 Speaker 01: based on the funding you're

01:03:34 Speaker 01: getting is two thousand net new

01:03:36 Speaker 01: patients. So it's like by the

01:03:38 Speaker 01: end of that, you know, when

01:03:39 Speaker 01: their target the by the deadline

01:03:41 Speaker 01: to hit the target, their roster

01:03:42 Speaker 01: has to be thirty two thousand.

01:03:44 Speaker 01: So whether they lose a physician

01:03:45 Speaker 01: and there's a thousand that are

01:03:47 Speaker 01: de rostered, like it has to

01:03:48 Speaker 01: be. like net new attachments. So

01:03:50 Speaker 01: yes, if you know if we

01:03:54 Speaker 01: end up losing a physician, then

01:04:00 Speaker 01: that's a lot of extra work

01:04:01 Speaker 01: that has to be done in

01:04:03 Speaker 01: order to actually hit that net

01:04:05 Speaker 01: new attachment number. Okay, thank you.

01:04:07 Speaker 01: Any further hands or questions? Not

01:04:12 Speaker 01: seen any. So thank you. It

01:04:14 Speaker 01: is always very helpful that you

01:04:19 Speaker 01: come to us on a regular

01:04:21 Speaker 01: basis, as you have been doing,

01:04:22 Speaker 01: because then hopefully then the questions

01:04:24 Speaker 01: won't be insurmountable. So we very

01:04:26 Speaker 01: much appreciate that update and all

01:04:34 Speaker 01: of the information and the follow

01:04:36 Speaker 01: up information that you've offered as

01:04:39 Speaker 01: well. So thank you for coming

01:04:43 Speaker 01: today. Okay. So what we're going

5 Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion

Councillor Paul McQueen moved to determine items requiring separate discussion from the consent agenda before a morning break and annual photo opportunity. Aaron Whitney subsequently moved to place specific items on the consent agenda for approval without further debate. The council authorized staff to apply for a loan with Infrastructure Ontario, aiming to consolidate applications for two paramedic bases in Durham and Feversham.

01:04:45 Speaker 01: to do at this point in

01:04:49 Speaker 01: time is I'm going to put

01:04:51 Speaker 01: a call out for the determination

01:04:52 Speaker 01: of items requiring separate discussion, so

01:04:56 Speaker 01: that staff will be aware if

01:04:57 Speaker 01: there's anything pulled from the consent

01:04:59 Speaker 01: agenda, and once we have voted

01:05:01 Speaker 01: on. the consent agenda, we will

01:05:03 Speaker 01: do our morning break, and at

01:05:05 Speaker 01: that point time, we will be

01:05:07 Speaker 01: doing the annual photo. So we're

01:05:09 Speaker 01: going to ask during the break

01:05:11 Speaker 01: time that we all gather for

01:05:13 Speaker 01: the photo first, before going off

01:05:14 Speaker 01: for refreshments, etc. So with that,

01:05:17 Speaker 01: it is there are eight. Looks

01:05:19 Speaker 01: like five, six, seven, eight. Yes,

01:05:21 Speaker 01: eight items on the consent agenda.

01:05:24 Speaker 01: Are there any that any committee,

01:05:26 Speaker 01: the whole members wish to pull,

01:05:28 Speaker 01: Councillor Eccles? Yes, thank you, Warden.

01:05:31 Speaker 01: Through you, six E and six

01:05:32 Speaker 01: F. Okay, so six E and

01:05:35 Speaker 01: F are polled. Councillor Carleton, and

01:05:37 Speaker 01: then I'll go to Councillor McKay

01:05:38 Speaker 01: after that. Thank you, Warden. I

01:05:40 Speaker 01: would like six B and six

01:05:42 Speaker 01: D. Okay, Councillor McKay. Thank you,

01:05:44 Speaker 01: through you, Warden. Six A, please.

01:05:45 Speaker 01: 6A, please. Want to get them

01:05:54 Speaker 01: all removed. Okay, so we've got

01:05:55 Speaker 01: 6C, G, and H left. Anyone

01:05:57 Speaker 01: want those ones pulled? Okay. Don't

01:05:58 Speaker 13: see any other hands raised. So

01:06:12 Speaker 17: in that case, then it's recommended

01:06:15 Speaker 13: that the following consent agenda consent

01:22:35 Speaker 18: items be received, and that staff

01:22:38 Speaker 18: be authorized to take actions necessary

01:22:40 Speaker 18: to give effect to the recommendations

01:22:42 Speaker 18: in the staff reports, and that

01:22:44 Speaker 18: the correspondence be supported or received

01:22:47 Speaker 18: for information. as recommended in the

01:22:51 Speaker 18: consent agenda, and this will be

01:22:54 Speaker 18: we will be voting on six

01:23:00 Speaker 18: C, G, and H only. So

01:23:01 Speaker 18: may ask for a mover and

01:23:03 Speaker 18: a seconder. Moved by Councillor Dobrin,

01:23:06 Speaker 18: seconded by Councillor Patterson. It's on

01:23:09 Speaker 18: the floor for any discussion. All

01:23:12 Speaker 18: those in favor, and that motion

01:23:13 Speaker 18: is carried. So after the break,

01:23:15 Speaker 18: we will continue with the two

01:23:19 Speaker 18: items for discussion on section seven,

01:23:23 Speaker 19: and then we will return to

01:23:25 Speaker 19: the pulled items for section six.

01:23:26 Speaker 19: before going into closed close meetings,

01:23:30 Speaker 19: which is scheduled for later in

01:23:33 Speaker 19: the committee of the whole. So

01:23:36 Speaker 19: let's take our break. We will

01:23:37 Speaker 19: be doing the photo as well.

01:23:39 Speaker 19: So, Madam Clerk, what time would

01:23:41 Speaker 19: you like everybody back? Okay, so

01:23:43 Speaker 19: we're going to do eleven twenty,

01:23:45 Speaker 19: a little longer than usual because

01:23:47 Speaker 19: we do need to do the

01:23:49 Speaker 19: photo first. Okay, thank you. It's

01:23:52 Speaker 19: in the lobby, and Olivia from

01:23:54 Speaker 19: Communications will meet you there. Okay.

01:23:55 Speaker 19: The the warden has been. She

01:23:57 Speaker 19: is away to a community event

01:23:58 Speaker 19: in the. Blue Mountains, so she's

01:23:59 Speaker 19: asked me to take the chair

01:24:01 Speaker 19: for the balance of the meeting.

01:24:03 Speaker 19: So, sorry for your luck. West

01:24:04 Speaker 19: Gray is no longer a member

01:24:06 Speaker 19: of Gray County Council. Excellent. All

01:24:10 Speaker 19: right. Well, we'll start off with

01:24:13 Speaker 19: items for direction and discussion. The

01:24:14 Speaker 19: first is report FRCW seventeen twenty

01:24:16 Speaker 19: six financing for paramedic services based.

01:24:20 Speaker 19: For paramedic services bases in Durham

01:24:22 Speaker 19: and Beavercam, Garrett is here to

01:24:23 Speaker 19: give us this report. I need

01:24:25 Speaker 19: a mover and seconder, please. Councilor

01:24:28 Speaker 19: Pringle, Councilor Mackey, thank you, Garrett.

01:24:30 Speaker 19: Welcome. Floor is yours, sir. Through

01:24:31 Speaker 19: the Deputy Boarding. Thank you and

01:24:34 Speaker 19: good morning. The report in front

01:24:36 Speaker 19: of you is requesting staff to

01:24:39 Speaker 19: have the authorization to apply for

01:24:41 Speaker 19: a loan with Infrastructure Ontario and

01:24:42 Speaker 19: to bring back a buy. And

01:24:45 Speaker 19: to bring back a bylaw to

01:24:49 Speaker 19: the next meeting of council that

01:24:51 Speaker 19: is required for that loan. Staff

01:24:54 Speaker 19: have had an initial meeting with

01:24:56 Speaker 19: Infrastructure Ontario, and they've actually recommended

01:24:58 Speaker 19: that the two capital projects that

01:25:00 Speaker 19: require financing be rolled into one

01:25:03 Speaker 19: application. They likened it to applying

01:25:04 Speaker 19: for a personal mortgage, where there's

01:25:07 Speaker 19: a credit application and a background

01:25:09 Speaker 19: process, and they really prefer that

01:25:14 Speaker 19: you only do one a year

01:25:18 Speaker 19: because it does take quite a

01:25:20 Speaker 19: bit of time. We still can

01:25:22 Speaker 19: do separate draws on the projects;

01:25:23 Speaker 19: we don't take all the money

01:25:26 Speaker 19: at one time. but packaging them

01:25:28 Speaker 19: under one joint application is the

01:25:30 Speaker 19: recommendation of Infrastructure Ontario. So the

01:25:31 Speaker 19: two projects that we'd be looking

01:25:33 Speaker 19: to finance are the Durham Paramedic

01:25:35 Speaker 19: Base, which was substantially completed in

01:25:36 Speaker 19: September, but there were some final

01:25:38 Speaker 19: items that needed to be cleaned

01:25:39 Speaker 19: up, and then we're just receiving

01:25:43 Speaker 19: the final invoicing now, which was

01:25:44 Speaker 19: expected to be based on the

01:25:46 Speaker 19: update or based on the award

01:25:49 Speaker 19: report PSR CW ten twenty. four

01:25:52 Speaker 19: to be approximately two point nine

01:25:54 Speaker 19: three three million, but based on

01:25:56 Speaker 19: not using all of the project

01:25:58 Speaker 19: contingencies, is going to come in

01:25:59 Speaker 19: at approximately two million seven hundred

01:26:02 Speaker 19: fifty thousand dollars. The second project

01:26:03 Speaker 19: is the Feversham Paramedic Base, which

01:26:05 Speaker 19: has been awarded through PSR CW

01:26:07 Speaker 19: oh six twenty five and is

01:26:08 Speaker 19: anticipated to have an overall project

01:26:11 Speaker 19: cost of two million three hundred

01:26:13 Speaker 19: ninety two thousand dollars. and is

01:26:15 Speaker 19: expected to be completed in late

01:26:16 Speaker 19: 2026. But similar to the Durham

01:26:19 Speaker 19: base, final invoicing and wrap up

01:26:22 Speaker 19: could could bleed into 2027. The

01:26:24 Speaker 19: two projects are now under budget,

01:26:26 Speaker 19: or sorry, are under budget. What

01:26:29 Speaker 19: we need to finance as well

01:26:31 Speaker 19: as we were able to use

01:26:33 Speaker 19: the current year's planned adventure payments,

01:26:34 Speaker 19: which total three hundred and sixty-two

01:26:37 Speaker 19: thousand six hundred dollars, and apply

01:26:40 Speaker 19: them against the amount we. have

01:26:42 Speaker 19: to borrow. So we're basically making

01:26:44 Speaker 19: our first adventure payment to ourselves,

01:26:46 Speaker 19: and then going out for the

01:26:48 Speaker 19: net. And then with the Chatsworth

01:26:50 Speaker 19: base, there was also some development

01:26:52 Speaker 19: charges and previous year reserve contributions

01:26:56 Speaker 19: that we're able to use as

01:26:59 Speaker 19: well, bringing that required borrow down

01:27:00 Speaker 19: to just under two point two

01:27:01 Speaker 19: million dollars. The budgets were built

01:27:03 Speaker 19: on the assumption that these bases

01:27:05 Speaker 19: would be financed over twenty five

01:27:08 Speaker 19: years at a five percent borrowing

01:27:09 Speaker 19: rate, and that's how we come.

01:27:12 Speaker 19: to the one hundred ninety-two thousand

01:27:15 Speaker 19: eight hundred dollars that's in the

01:27:16 Speaker 19: current budget for the Durham Deventure,

01:27:18 Speaker 19: and one hundred sixty-nine thousand eight

01:27:21 Speaker 19: hundred dollars that's in the Beaver

01:27:23 Speaker 19: Sham Deventure. These numbers carry forward

01:27:25 Speaker 19: throughout the ten-year capital plan, and

01:27:27 Speaker 19: if we had a twenty-five-year capital

01:27:30 Speaker 19: plan, they would continue for the

01:27:32 Speaker 19: next twenty-five years. Staff are recommending

01:27:33 Speaker 19: that we change the plan slightly.

01:27:35 Speaker 19: Instead of amortizing over a twenty-five-year

01:27:36 Speaker 19: loan, that we secure a a

01:27:38 Speaker 19: twenty-year loan instead. The reasons that

01:27:40 Speaker 19: we're recommending that is it comes

01:27:41 Speaker 19: at a slightly lower borrowing rate

01:27:43 Speaker 19: based on the current rates offered

01:27:45 Speaker 19: by Infrastructure Ontario, and it allows

01:27:48 Speaker 19: us to use the project savings

01:27:50 Speaker 19: that we've seen to eliminate five

01:27:53 Speaker 19: years of mortgage payments at the

01:27:56 Speaker 19: end of the loan, and will

01:27:59 Speaker 19: save the county approximately eight hundred

01:28:01 Speaker 19: and twenty-one thousand dollars over the

01:28:02 Speaker 19: term of that loan in interest

01:28:04 Speaker 19: payments. It's still within the approved

01:28:05 Speaker 19: capital. budget of three hundred sixty-two

01:28:07 Speaker 19: thousand six hundred. As based on

01:28:09 Speaker 19: current rates, would be at about

01:28:10 Speaker 19: three hundred and forty-four thousand. Would

01:28:12 Speaker 19: be the total mortgage payment, but

01:28:13 Speaker 19: that will be dependent on what

01:28:16 Speaker 19: the rates are when we actually

01:28:17 Speaker 19: draw the financing, as Infrastructure Ontario

01:28:19 Speaker 19: updates them weekly. And then the

01:28:20 Speaker 19: only other thing, or two other

01:28:22 Speaker 19: things I want to highlight is

01:28:24 Speaker 19: we haven't the Chatsworth base. We

01:28:25 Speaker 19: finance internally, and typically, and same

01:28:26 Speaker 19: with the administration building, typically. loans

01:28:29 Speaker 19: of this scale, we've decided to

01:28:31 Speaker 19: borrow against our own reserves, charge

01:28:35 Speaker 19: ourselves interest, and pay ourselves back

01:28:37 Speaker 19: the interest because we can do

01:28:38 Speaker 19: it at a slightly more competitive

01:28:41 Speaker 19: rate. But you still want to

01:28:43 Speaker 19: charge yourself the interest because you're

01:28:46 Speaker 19: losing out on the opportunity cost

01:28:48 Speaker 19: of having that money in your

01:28:50 Speaker 19: bank account or investing that money

01:28:52 Speaker 19: while you're paying yourself back. For

01:28:55 Speaker 19: these paramedic loans, we're recommending to

01:28:57 Speaker 19: go external for the purpose of

01:29:00 Speaker 19: maximizing provincial funding. So the interest

01:29:02 Speaker 19: cost. on these ventures are eligible

01:29:05 Speaker 19: for fifty-fifty funding from the Ministry

7.a FR-CW-17-26 Financing Paramedic Services Bases in Durham and Feversham

Sim Salata explained that borrowing at standard rates allows the province to return ineligible internal interest funds via Infrastructure Ontario rules, resulting in a net cost for financing paramedic service bases externally rather than using restricted capital. Tara Warder noted that while Gray County has an annual debt repayment limit calculated via FIR filings as a specific high figure, the county's own threshold restricts repayments to ten percent of own-source revenues, capping available funds at a lower amount because current obligations for the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment project consume a significant portion annually from this limit. Council approved a permanent position for the Green Development Program coordinator instead of a short-term contract, enabling better recruitment and offsetting budget costs against Natural Resources Canada grants to reduce projected expenses in 2027.

01:29:09 Speaker 19: of Health. So if I take

01:29:10 Speaker 19: a simple number and say that

01:29:12 Speaker 19: we can borrow at five percent,

01:29:13 Speaker 19: the province is then going to

01:29:18 Speaker 19: give us back two point five

01:29:20 Speaker 19: percent in grants. So our our

01:29:22 Speaker 19: net borrowing cost is two point

01:29:23 Speaker 19: five million dollars. We can then

01:29:25 Speaker 19: go out and take that money

01:29:26 Speaker 19: that we we might have used

01:29:28 Speaker 19: to finance it ourselves and invest

01:29:30 Speaker 19: it. And even if we're earning

01:29:32 Speaker 19: a rate of three percent, there's

01:29:36 Speaker 19: a point five percent that the

01:29:37 Speaker 19: county is now making. on that

01:29:40 Speaker 19: money, so it really does make

01:29:42 Speaker 19: sense based on the grant structure

01:29:44 Speaker 19: to finance these externally. As internal

01:29:46 Speaker 19: interest is not an eligible expense

01:29:47 Speaker 19: with Infrastructure Ontario, and then I've

01:29:50 Speaker 19: highlighted that under the Municipal Act,

01:29:52 Speaker 19: we do have the authority to

01:29:54 Speaker 19: borrow, but it is limited. We

01:29:56 Speaker 19: can only go up to 25%

01:29:57 Speaker 19: of our own sourced revenues, and

01:30:00 Speaker 19: that's calculated through our annual FIR

01:30:02 Speaker 19: filing. As of 2026, that amount

01:30:04 Speaker 19: that we could have in annual

01:30:05 Speaker 19: debt repayments before exceeding that threshold

01:30:07 Speaker 19: is twenty-four million one hundred and

01:30:10 Speaker 19: ninety-six thousand nine hundred fifty-seven dollars.

01:30:12 Speaker 19: However, Gray County has its own

01:30:22 Speaker 20: internal threshold that annual debt repayments

01:30:27 Speaker 20: shall not exceed ten percent of

01:30:31 Speaker 20: the own-source revenues. So that means

01:30:36 Speaker 20: that we can go up to

01:30:39 Speaker 20: nine point nine million eight hundred

01:30:41 Speaker 20: thirty-eight thousand seven hundred eighty-two dollars.

01:30:45 Speaker 20: Currently, after last year's budget. process,

01:30:50 Speaker 20: the county has no debt, so

01:30:51 Speaker 20: this would be the only debt

01:30:53 Speaker 20: on the books. But as we

01:30:56 Speaker 20: know, we are going to be

01:31:00 Speaker 20: having debt payments for the new

01:31:04 Speaker 20: Rockwood Terrace redevelopment project, and those

01:31:06 Speaker 20: are expected to be approximately three

01:31:08 Speaker 20: point six million dollars per year.

01:31:10 Speaker 20: However, that full amount does not

01:31:18 Speaker 20: go against our annual repayment limit

01:31:20 Speaker 20: because we have a dedicated provincial

01:31:21 Speaker 20: grant. So you take the net

01:31:23 Speaker 19: of one point nine million dollars.

01:31:26 Speaker 19: So you take the net of

01:31:29 Speaker 19: those two numbers. and the Rockwood

01:31:30 Speaker 19: Terrace project will consume one point

01:31:32 Speaker 19: seven million dollars of our annual

01:31:34 Speaker 19: repayment limit. So, when you combine

01:31:36 Speaker 19: that with these loans, we will

01:31:40 Speaker 19: have about two million dollars of

01:31:42 Speaker 19: annual repayments of debt in our

01:31:46 Speaker 19: budget, which would leave about seven

01:31:48 Speaker 19: point seven nine million dollars for

01:31:51 Speaker 19: any future projects. With that, I'm

01:31:53 Speaker 19: happy to answer any questions. Thank

01:31:55 Speaker 19: you, sir. Very comprehensive. Are there

01:31:56 Speaker 19: any questions from council? Councillor Apples,

01:31:57 Speaker 19: please. Thank you, Deputy Warden. Through

01:31:58 Speaker 19: you, so going forward, we certainly

01:32:00 Speaker 19: have a very robust build out

01:32:03 Speaker 19: of stations, and I take it

01:32:04 Speaker 19: that staff best feeling is in

01:32:06 Speaker 19: building out the number of ones

01:32:07 Speaker 19: done. Dundalk, Holstein, Aten, Cobble Beach.

01:32:08 Speaker 19: How many other ones am I

01:32:12 Speaker 19: missing that we're going to be

01:32:16 Speaker 19: developing? There's six more. We will

01:32:17 Speaker 19: be looking at financing those ones

01:32:20 Speaker 19: instead of ramping up some of

01:32:23 Speaker 19: our tax revenues. Obviously, ramping it

01:32:25 Speaker 19: up a little bit to pay

01:32:27 Speaker 19: off the mortgage and not to

01:32:31 Speaker 19: directly pay it off. Through the

01:32:32 Speaker 19: deputy warden, yes, that's correct. The

01:32:36 Speaker 19: way our ten-year capital plan is

01:32:39 Speaker 19: built right now is all the

01:32:42 Speaker 19: future bases will be debt financed

01:32:44 Speaker 08: as well. With the Durham base,

01:32:46 Speaker 08: it was in the capital plan

01:32:49 Speaker 08: before the enhancement plan came along

01:32:50 Speaker 08: because we knew we needed more

01:32:52 Speaker 08: space. But the enhancement plan made

01:32:55 Speaker 08: that base bigger as we needed

01:32:58 Speaker 08: a operational base at the south

01:32:59 Speaker 08: end. of the county, the other

01:33:03 Speaker 08: bases, there's simply not enough time

01:33:06 Speaker 08: to build up that reserve so

01:33:08 Speaker 08: that we could finance it all

01:33:10 Speaker 08: ourselves. In a perfect world, yeah,

01:33:12 Speaker 08: if we knew we were building

01:33:16 Speaker 08: it in 25 years, we would

01:33:19 Speaker 08: start putting away money now. Or

01:33:22 Speaker 08: 10 years, even you would you

01:33:24 Speaker 08: would you could potentially increase your

01:33:26 Speaker 08: levy now, transfer to reserve, and

01:33:28 Speaker 08: then when it comes to actually

01:33:31 Speaker 08: build it, you're just paying for

01:33:32 Speaker 08: it outright, and your interest costs

01:33:36 Speaker 08: are zero. But with the deployment

01:33:38 Speaker 08: plan coming and the immediate need

01:33:40 Speaker 08: for additional ambulances and the additional

01:33:41 Speaker 08: need to put those ambulances somewhere,

01:33:43 Speaker 08: and then the benefit of having

01:33:45 Speaker 08: these rural bases built, there just

01:33:47 Speaker 08: wasn't enough time to build up

01:33:50 Speaker 08: those capital reserves that we could

01:33:52 Speaker 08: fund it. Councillor Gregg, did you

01:33:54 Speaker 08: have a question? Thank you. I

01:33:56 Speaker 08: did have a question. I I

01:33:58 Speaker 08: just. I'm intrigued with the option

01:33:59 Speaker 08: of the 15 years. The report

01:34:01 Speaker 08: notes the savings from going from

01:34:04 Speaker 08: 25 to 20 years, but there's

01:34:06 Speaker 08: substantial savings in going to 15

01:34:08 Speaker 08: years. I was talking to Garrett

01:34:10 Speaker 08: in advance, and Garrett could expand

01:34:11 Speaker 08: upon the the response provided to

01:34:16 Speaker 08: myself. But when I look at

01:34:19 Speaker 08: the just the core numbers, your

01:34:20 Speaker 08: borrowing cost is is 38 of

01:34:25 Speaker 08: the actual amount required to borrow.

01:34:26 Speaker 08: if you were to invest in

01:34:29 Speaker 08: in a mortgage over fifteen years,

01:34:31 Speaker 08: as opposed to fifty five percent

01:34:35 Speaker 08: over twenty years. There t here

01:34:37 Speaker 08: is an upfront cost, but I

01:34:39 Speaker 08: think you know it does get

01:34:40 Speaker 08: it paid off. It's nice. We're

01:34:46 Speaker 08: in a great position right now

01:34:51 Speaker 19: with zero debt. That's the best

01:34:53 Speaker 19: place to be, and I am

01:34:57 Speaker 19: I am a little bit more

01:35:00 Speaker 19: intrigued, certainly to to. look at

01:35:03 Speaker 19: a fifteen year mortgage that gets

01:35:04 Speaker 19: us back to that position, and

01:35:06 Speaker 19: it's a position where we can

01:35:08 Speaker 19: make, and you can make those

01:35:11 Speaker 19: contributions back into your capital fund

01:35:13 Speaker 19: after you've paid it off. Because

01:35:14 Speaker 19: after thirty years, that's you know

01:35:16 Speaker 19: frankly a time period that you're

01:35:17 Speaker 19: going to start having to reinvest

01:35:19 Speaker 19: back into your your typical building.

01:35:20 Speaker 19: So it gives you more opportunity

01:35:23 Speaker 19: as opposed to a twenty or

01:35:24 Speaker 19: twenty five year when you're still

01:35:26 Speaker 19: making capital payments or debenture payments

01:35:27 Speaker 19: on the capital. cost to be

01:35:28 Speaker 19: able to have it paid off,

01:35:30 Speaker 19: and be looking a little bit

01:35:34 Speaker 19: more forward in terms of making

01:35:37 Speaker 19: reserve contributions to support the the

01:35:40 Speaker 19: required capital needs after after thirty,

01:35:44 Speaker 19: thirty five, forty years that so

01:35:45 Speaker 19: many of our buildings require.

01:35:48 Speaker 19: But I guess that's my position,

01:35:50 Speaker 19: Garrett. If you want to expand

01:35:53 Speaker 19: on the difference in the capital

01:36:09 Speaker 19: budget requirement up front versus the

01:36:11 Speaker 19: ultimate. savings over that reduction from

01:36:13 Speaker 19: twenty years to fifteen years. I

01:36:14 Speaker 19: think I'm I kind of find

01:36:16 Speaker 19: it favorable the fifteen year option.

01:36:18 Speaker 19: Thank you through the warded deputy

01:36:20 Speaker 19: warded. Yeah, staff are happy to

01:36:22 Speaker 19: take direction from council on whatever

01:36:26 Speaker 19: term most suits your needs. A

01:36:31 Speaker 21: shorter borrowing period. You're correct. Results

01:36:35 Speaker 21: in lower cost over the term

01:36:37 Speaker 21: of the loan because you're paying

01:36:42 Speaker 21: it off faster. So, you know,

01:36:43 Speaker 21: if you look at the horizon

01:36:45 Speaker 21: of a 25-year mortgage, at the

01:36:46 Speaker 21: beginning, almost the entirety of your

01:36:49 Speaker 21: payment is going towards interest, and

01:36:51 Speaker 21: then as it goes along, it

01:36:53 Speaker 21: kind of drops off like this

01:36:55 Speaker 21: as as the as the payments

01:36:56 Speaker 21: are become more and more principal.

01:36:59 Speaker 21: If you shorten the term, you're

01:37:00 Speaker 21: increasing your payment. As so, at

01:37:02 Speaker 21: the beginning, your interest cost is

01:37:03 Speaker 21: the exact same, but you're paying

01:37:10 Speaker 19: off more of the principal, and

01:37:12 Speaker 19: that cascades every year. So, correct.

01:37:14 Speaker 19: If we want, if council directs

01:37:16 Speaker 19: us to go towards a a

01:37:18 Speaker 19: fifteen year mortgage, that'll certainly save.

01:37:21 Speaker 19: It'll save approximately seven hundred and

01:37:22 Speaker 19: fifty thousand dollars compared to the

01:37:25 Speaker 19: recommendation that's that's currently before you.

01:37:27 Speaker 19: But it will require an increase

01:37:29 Speaker 19: to the twenty twenty seven capital

01:37:29 Speaker 19: budget of. So currently, there's three

01:37:32 Speaker 19: hundred and sixty-two thousand in the

01:37:33 Speaker 19: in the budget. We would have

01:37:37 Speaker 19: to increase that to four hundred

01:37:40 Speaker 19: and six thousand, so about forty-four

01:37:41 Speaker 19: thousand dollars additional to what was

01:37:42 Speaker 19: in the twenty twenty-six budget and

01:37:44 Speaker 19: what was in the twenty twenty-seven

01:37:48 Speaker 19: capital forecast onward. Again, there's benefits

01:37:49 Speaker 19: to both options. Thank you, Garrett.

01:37:50 Speaker 19: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very much,

01:37:52 Speaker 19: Deputy Warden. And just for clarity,

01:37:55 Speaker 19: on on Councillor Greg's idea there,

01:37:59 Speaker 19: switching over, would we have to

01:37:59 Speaker 19: actually increase the full forty four

01:38:01 Speaker 19: thousand because the province kicks in

01:38:02 Speaker 19: the grant? So I guess my

01:38:03 Speaker 19: question is, the three hundred sixty

01:38:05 Speaker 19: two thousand we're already putting away,

01:38:08 Speaker 19: the payment increases, but part of

01:38:09 Speaker 19: that payment is that. interest. Do

01:38:11 Speaker 19: we know, you know, what is

01:38:12 Speaker 19: the actual increase? It might not

01:38:14 Speaker 19: actually be the forty-four thousand dollars

01:38:15 Speaker 19: increase to the capital because the

01:38:17 Speaker 19: provincial grant kick it kickups through

01:38:18 Speaker 19: the deputy warden. Paying it off

01:38:19 Speaker 19: faster actually results in slightly less

01:38:22 Speaker 19: grant because you have less interest

01:38:29 Speaker 22: expense. So the principal repayment is

01:38:33 Speaker 22: not eligible for grant, but that

01:38:35 Speaker 22: grant was calculated already as part

01:38:36 Speaker 22: of the twenty twenty seven budget.

01:38:39 Speaker 22: Part of the 2027 budget because,

01:38:40 Speaker 22: and that's why we included it

01:38:42 Speaker 22: in the 2026 budget to make

01:38:45 Speaker 22: sure that the grant was there

01:38:48 Speaker 22: for 2027. So that grant is

01:38:52 Speaker 22: now going to be received next

01:38:54 Speaker 22: year. But then, if this decision's

01:38:56 Speaker 18: made, the interest in 2027 won't

01:38:59 Speaker 18: change because you're paying it on

01:39:01 Speaker 18: the same principal. We can't change

01:39:03 Speaker 18: that number now, but the interest

01:39:09 Speaker 18: in 2028 budget will be slightly

01:39:11 Speaker 16: lower because we paid off more

01:39:13 Speaker 16: of the debt and we're paying

01:39:18 Speaker 16: interest on less of the debt.

01:39:20 Speaker 16: So we'll be getting. reimbursed less

01:39:23 Speaker 16: on that that interest expense. So

01:39:25 Speaker 16: it's it's you're you're saving on

01:39:27 Speaker 16: one hand, but then you're slightly

01:39:29 Speaker 16: losing the grant on the other.

01:39:33 Speaker 16: But but the net, you're still

01:39:34 Speaker 16: you're still saving, but you're saving

01:39:38 Speaker 16: at fifty percent. the The provincial

01:39:41 Speaker 16: grant for paramedic services is a

01:39:49 Speaker 19: is a funny one to budget

01:39:54 Speaker 19: for because you find a savings,

01:39:59 Speaker 19: but then in the next year

01:40:01 Speaker 19: that uses loses you a little

01:40:04 Speaker 19: bit of grant. You add a

01:40:07 Speaker 19: cost, and it hurts upfront, but

01:40:08 Speaker 19: then next year the grant catches

01:40:09 Speaker 19: up. It's it's a tricky one

01:40:12 Speaker 19: aligning. our budget with with their

01:40:15 Speaker 19: grant timelines. Any other questions, Councillor

01:40:16 Speaker 19: Mackey? Thank you, Warden. I've always

01:40:19 Speaker 19: been in favor of not paying

01:40:22 Speaker 19: any more interest than I had

01:40:25 Speaker 19: to. So, if Councillor Greg is

01:40:27 Speaker 19: willing to put forth a motion

01:40:28 Speaker 19: to move it to fifteen years,

01:40:30 Speaker 19: I'd be happy to second it.

01:40:36 Speaker 19: Councillor Greg, any thoughts? Well, I

01:40:39 Speaker 19: will make that amendment. Okay, Councillor

01:40:40 Speaker 19: Greg has moved an amendment to

01:40:43 Speaker 19: the motion to change the payment

01:40:45 Speaker 19: repayment period to 15 years. Is

01:40:49 Speaker 19: that yep? And Councillor Mackey is

01:40:50 Speaker 19: willing to second that. Any discussion

01:40:53 Speaker 19: on the amendment, Councillor Dubreuil? Thank

01:40:57 Speaker 23: you, and through you, Deputy Warden,

01:40:59 Speaker 23: to the point. I have

01:41:02 Speaker 23: no objection to changing the amortization

01:41:07 Speaker 23: period. I guess my question is

01:41:10 Speaker 23: more skepticism. Is there in writing

01:41:12 Speaker 23: that the funding from the government

01:41:13 Speaker 23: on the interest payment will continue

01:41:15 Speaker 23: for the period or term of

01:41:17 Speaker 23: the loan, or could we be

01:41:22 Speaker 24: in a situation where we have

01:41:24 Speaker 24: the loan and they cancel the

01:41:25 Speaker 24: funding formula? Sort of the same

01:41:27 Speaker 24: question as Santa Claus real. Garrett.

01:41:28 Speaker 24: The deputy warden. That the answer

01:41:33 Speaker 24: is no. We do our grant

01:41:35 Speaker 24: on a single year basis. The

01:41:39 Speaker 24: grant formula hasn't changed in the

01:41:43 Speaker 24: last six, seven years. I believe

01:41:45 Speaker 24: at seven years ago, we used

01:41:48 Speaker 24: to get an inflationary increase on

01:41:50 Speaker 24: the previous year's expenses. That was

01:41:51 Speaker 24: removed. So the grant hasn't changed.

01:41:53 Speaker 24: but in theory, yes, the Ministry

01:41:55 Speaker 24: of Health could change their eligibility

01:41:57 Speaker 24: criteria or their funding model for

01:41:59 Speaker 24: paramedic services as a whole and

01:42:00 Speaker 24: disqualify interest on borrowing. And these

01:42:03 Speaker 24: would become an ineligible expense, and

01:42:05 Speaker 24: now we'd be paying 100 of

01:42:08 Speaker 24: the the interest. Any further discussion

01:42:09 Speaker 24: on the amendment? Not seeing any.

01:42:11 Speaker 24: I'll call the question. All those

01:42:14 Speaker 24: in favor? That is carried. So

01:42:17 Speaker 24: now we're back to the original

01:42:19 Speaker 24: motion as amended. Any further discussion?

01:42:21 Speaker 24: I'll call the question. All those

01:42:23 Speaker 24: in favor? That is carried. Thank

01:42:28 Speaker 24: you, Garrett. Moving on to the

01:42:31 Speaker 24: next item, which is CW twenty-two

01:42:34 Speaker 24: dash twenty-six Green Development Program staffing

01:42:35 Speaker 24: issue. The update. Sorry. Sorry. Update.

01:42:37 Speaker 24: The the deputy CEO will

01:42:38 Speaker 24: be taking this one. Welcome, Nile.

01:42:41 Speaker 24: Taking this one, welcome, Niall. The

01:42:44 Speaker 24: floor is yours. Oh, we need

01:42:47 Speaker 24: a mover and seconder, please. Councillor

01:42:51 Speaker 24: Pringle, Councillor Nielsen. Floor is yours,

01:42:54 Speaker 24: sir. Good morning. Thank you, Deputy

01:42:57 Speaker 24: Warden. Good morning, members of Council.

01:42:59 Speaker 24: I will keep my comments fairly

01:43:00 Speaker 24: brief on this one. This is

01:43:03 Speaker 24: a good news, bad news, good

01:43:06 Speaker 24: news story. So, congratulations to our

01:43:08 Speaker 24: manager of climate change initiatives, who

01:43:10 Speaker 24: is moving on into an educational

01:43:12 Speaker 24: leave to. to complete some some

01:43:14 Speaker 24: further education in terms of of

01:43:16 Speaker 24: climate science and environmental sciences, which

01:43:18 Speaker 24: is which is fantastic when somebody

01:43:22 Speaker 24: moves on into into great things

01:43:25 Speaker 24: in their career. That of course

01:43:28 Speaker 24: leaves us with a vacancy in

01:43:30 Speaker 24: that role. The good news that

01:43:33 Speaker 24: we have is we have a

01:43:34 Speaker 24: coordinator who has been with the

01:43:36 Speaker 24: county for a number of years

01:43:39 Speaker 24: and who is agreeable to and

01:43:41 Speaker 24: keen to step into an interim

01:43:42 Speaker 24: capacity as manager to be able

01:43:45 Speaker 24: to see us through. certainly the

01:43:47 Speaker 24: next few months as we go

01:43:50 Speaker 24: through the budget process and understand

01:43:53 Speaker 24: the the future of Climate Change

01:43:54 Speaker 24: Initiative Going Green and Gray as

01:43:57 Speaker 24: per the conversations we've had over

01:44:00 Speaker 24: the last few weeks here

01:44:02 Speaker 24: at County Council. So congratulations to

01:44:04 Speaker 24: to both individuals in in those

01:44:05 Speaker 24: moves. That does leave us short,

01:44:07 Speaker 24: however, in the coordinator role, and

01:44:10 Speaker 24: that coordinator role is currently working

01:44:11 Speaker 24: on the green development. standards. The

01:44:13 Speaker 24: green development standards, as you are

01:44:15 Speaker 24: aware, is a tri-county partnership between

01:44:18 Speaker 24: ourselves, Dufferin and Wellington, recently launched

01:44:20 Speaker 24: and in the early stages of

01:44:21 Speaker 24: implementation, supporting the counties and developers

01:44:23 Speaker 24: within the counties to advance green

01:44:25 Speaker 24: development projects in their their areas.

01:44:27 Speaker 24: The interest has been high so

01:44:28 Speaker 24: far, and we're at the very

01:44:31 Speaker 24: early stages. Grey County hosts a

01:44:34 Speaker 24: coordinating A coordinator role on behalf

01:44:36 Speaker 24: of the tri-county partnership to both

01:44:39 Speaker 24: develop that program and to support

01:44:41 Speaker 24: it through its implementation. The agreement

01:44:42 Speaker 24: for supporting it through its implementation

01:44:43 Speaker 24: is fully funded through the partnership

01:44:45 Speaker 24: between the three counties and an

01:44:48 Speaker 24: NRCan Natural Resources Canada grant aid

01:44:49 Speaker 24: package. That program wraps up is

01:44:51 Speaker 24: anticipated to wrap up in summer

01:44:52 Speaker 24: of 2027. At which point the

01:44:54 Speaker 24: program is embedded within the three

01:44:56 Speaker 24: counties as part. of their core

01:44:57 Speaker 24: program. However, we have that gap

01:45:00 Speaker 24: between now and summer 2027, where

01:45:01 Speaker 24: the role of the coordinator was

01:45:03 Speaker 24: being relied on to help take

01:45:04 Speaker 24: the counties through that program. With

01:45:06 Speaker 24: the changes internally, that coordinator is

01:45:09 Speaker 24: is is shifting into the manager

01:45:12 Speaker 24: capacity, and and does not have

01:45:14 Speaker 24: the capacity to be able to

01:45:16 Speaker 24: deliver both the green development program

01:45:18 Speaker 24: and the role of of manager

01:45:20 Speaker 24: of of climate change, climate and

01:45:21 Speaker 24: environmental initiatives. here at the county,

01:45:24 Speaker 24: so that leaves us with the

01:45:26 Speaker 24: vacancy, which we'd like to backfill.

01:45:28 Speaker 24: The backfilling of that vacancy is

01:45:30 Speaker 24: relatively easy in terms of process,

01:45:32 Speaker 24: and we don't need council authorization

01:45:33 Speaker 24: for that. It's already something which

01:45:36 Speaker 24: you've approved. It's fully funded, has

01:45:37 Speaker 24: no no impact. The challenge is

01:45:40 Speaker 24: we require a skill set to

01:45:43 Speaker 24: do that work, which may be

01:45:45 Speaker 24: challenging. We anticipate will be challenging

01:45:49 Speaker 24: to find for a relatively short

01:45:52 Speaker 24: term contract of the order of

01:45:54 Speaker 24: probably nine to ten months in

01:45:56 Speaker 24: length. Given the conversations we had

01:45:58 Speaker 24: last month around the horseshoe and

01:46:02 Speaker 24: the appetite that County Council expressed

01:46:03 Speaker 24: around the the direction you provided

01:46:06 Speaker 24: in terms of coming back to

01:46:08 Speaker 24: budget with both the request for

01:46:10 Speaker 24: a full time permanent position and

01:46:11 Speaker 24: a contract position to support the

01:46:13 Speaker 24: original implementation of going green and

01:46:16 Speaker 24: grey, we thought it was prudent

01:46:18 Speaker 24: to come back to County Council

01:46:19 Speaker 24: at this point and say and

01:46:23 Speaker 24: see whether they're with appetite in

01:46:25 Speaker 24: us changing that from being a

01:46:27 Speaker 24: short term contract role to a

01:46:29 Speaker 24: permanent role. that would allow us

01:46:31 Speaker 24: to apply for a greater pool

01:46:33 Speaker 24: of candidates to be able to

01:46:36 Speaker 24: apply for the position, probably a

01:46:37 Speaker 24: more competitive recruit, and probably greater

01:46:39 Speaker 24: success in terms of identifying a

01:46:41 Speaker 24: candidate. If we were if council

01:46:45 Speaker 24: county council was supportive of this

01:46:47 Speaker 24: approach, we would have that role

01:46:50 Speaker 24: undertake the green development standards work

01:46:53 Speaker 24: for the for the initial term

01:46:55 Speaker 24: of their contract, and then step

01:46:57 Speaker 24: into the coordinator role supporting the

01:46:59 Speaker 18: going green and grey at the

01:47:01 Speaker 18: conclusion of that. and so that

01:47:05 Speaker 18: does have a positive budget impact,

01:47:11 Speaker 18: and this is the last piece

01:47:12 Speaker 18: of good news: a positive budget

01:47:15 Speaker 18: impact in terms of the proposals

01:47:17 Speaker 18: we have for the 2027 budget.

01:47:21 Speaker 18: So, when we county council saw

01:47:24 Speaker 18: the draft 2027 budget, had a

01:47:26 Speaker 18: single permanent position in for about

01:47:29 Speaker 18: 122,000 in in that year, based

01:47:34 Speaker 25: on the decisions and discussion we've

01:47:38 Speaker 25: had over the last few months.

01:47:40 Speaker 25: The impact, as I'd The impact,

01:47:43 Speaker 25: as identified in that report, was

01:47:46 Speaker 25: 196,000. This would actually allow us

01:47:48 Speaker 25: to rejig the budget because we'd

01:47:52 Speaker 25: be offsetting some of that full-time,

01:47:56 Speaker 25: that one year of that permanent

01:47:59 Speaker 25: position against the grant, and so

01:48:04 Speaker 26: it would actually allow us to

01:48:05 Speaker 26: bring the 2027 budget in at

01:48:07 Speaker 26: about 124,000, so a little bit

01:48:09 Speaker 26: less than we were anticipating, be

01:48:12 Speaker 26: able to bring this in. So

01:48:15 Speaker 26: we're seeking council's council county council

01:48:17 Speaker 26: support to to go for a.

01:48:21 Speaker 26: permanent role rather than a contract

01:48:22 Speaker 26: role to enable us to hopefully

01:48:26 Speaker 26: attract a better pool of candidates

01:48:28 Speaker 26: for the green development standard work

01:48:31 Speaker 26: over next next few months. And

01:48:36 Speaker 26: with that, Deputy Warden, I'm quite

01:48:37 Speaker 26: happy to take any questions. Very

01:48:40 Speaker 26: good, thank you, Sir. Are there

01:48:43 Speaker 26: any questions from Council? Not seeing

01:48:44 Speaker 26: any questions. I'll call the question.

01:48:46 Speaker 26: All those in favour? That is

01:48:50 Speaker 26: carried. Thank you, Sir. So with

01:48:53 Speaker 26: that, we. have finished our items

01:48:55 Speaker 26: that need direction beyond. So we'll

01:48:57 Speaker 26: go back to the pulled items

01:49:00 Speaker 26: from the consent agenda. The first

6.a Letter from the Honourable Minister Robert J. Flack - Community Benefits Charges and Parkland Regulation

Correspondence from Minister Robert J. Flack regarding community benefits charges and parkland regulation was received by Council to be reviewed. The legislation introduced through Bills 23 and 98 allows developers in Ontario to dedicate a broader range of lands, including privately owned public spaces known as POPS, which previously might have been ineligible for municipal acceptance. While the county does not directly handle parkland dedication, these changes could increase legal costs for nine-member municipalities if they are forced into agreements regarding encumbered or hazardous lands that developers wish to offload. The regulations further restrict eligibility by explicitly excluding contaminated and sensitive natural heritage sites from being proposed as parkland. Community benefit charges apply only to developments of five stories or greater exceeding ten residential units, a threshold not commonly met in most local municipalities.

01:49:03 Speaker 26: is six A, which is correspondence

01:49:06 Speaker 26: from the Honorable Minister Robert Flack.

01:49:09 Speaker 26: I forget who wanted to pull

01:49:12 Speaker 26: that, Councillor McKay. You'll move that

01:49:15 Speaker 26: to receive. Is there a seconder

01:49:19 Speaker 26: for that, Councillor Keaveny? Go ahead.

01:49:21 Speaker 26: Oh wait. Scott, you want to

01:49:23 Speaker 26: say anything regarding this item, or

01:49:24 Speaker 26: first, or just be available for

01:49:25 Speaker 26: questions? Okay, Councillor McKay, please. Thank

01:49:28 Speaker 26: you, Deputy Worden. I just want

01:49:29 Speaker 26: to get Scott's opinion on explaining

01:49:31 Speaker 26: a bit more about what's going

01:49:33 Speaker 26: on here. Whether we're going to

01:49:34 Speaker 26: lose municipality, will lose any of

01:49:36 Speaker 26: its parkland dedication? or funding that

01:49:39 Speaker 26: we do now get. So just

01:49:41 Speaker 26: to explain what's going on. Okay,

01:49:42 Speaker 26: Scott, do respond to that, please.

01:49:46 Speaker 26: Yeah, thank you, and through you

01:49:49 Speaker 26: to to Council McQuay. Thanks for

01:49:50 Speaker 26: the question. So this one is

01:49:52 Speaker 26: is a little bit complicated. Basically,

01:49:54 Speaker 26: what's happened is is a couple

01:49:57 Speaker 26: years ago through Bill Twenty Three,

01:49:59 Speaker 26: and again through Bill Ninety Eight,

01:50:02 Speaker 26: early. 98 earlier this year, the

01:50:03 Speaker 26: provinces made some changes with respect

01:50:06 Speaker 26: to parkland dedication in Ontario, and

01:50:07 Speaker 26: essentially what it does is allows

01:50:09 Speaker 26: for developers to dedicate a broader

01:50:11 Speaker 26: range of parkland to municipalities that,

01:50:14 Speaker 26: in some cases, perhaps in the

01:50:15 Speaker 26: past, municipalities would have been reticent

01:50:17 Speaker 26: to receive as parkland. So, some

01:50:19 Speaker 26: of those new changes that were

01:50:22 Speaker 26: passed through the legislation include allowing

01:50:23 Speaker 26: for developers to to use already

01:50:27 Speaker 26: encumbered land as parkland, privately owned

01:50:28 Speaker 26: public spaces as parkland, or what's

01:50:30 Speaker 26: the acronym on that one is

01:50:32 Speaker 26: is POPS, and and other lands

01:50:34 Speaker 26: that the developer may identify, and

01:50:37 Speaker 26: then so through the the recent

01:50:40 Speaker 26: regulations that have have now passed,

01:50:42 Speaker 26: it sets out criteria for

01:50:43 Speaker 26: for sort of how that parkland

01:50:46 Speaker 26: could get dedicated. The legislation also

01:50:50 Speaker 26: gave greater ability. for the the

01:50:52 Speaker 26: developer to appeal the decision of

01:50:53 Speaker 26: a municipality if they chose to

01:50:56 Speaker 26: say no to that parkland. So

01:50:58 Speaker 26: let's just say you were

01:51:01 Speaker 26: dealing with a subdivision application. The

01:51:03 Speaker 26: developer said, "Hey, we'd love to

01:51:06 Speaker 26: give you these lands in the

01:51:09 Speaker 26: northeast corner." And the municipality said,

01:51:10 Speaker 26: "Absolutely, we don't want those lands

01:51:13 Speaker 26: in the northeast corner." The developer

01:51:16 Speaker 26: could now appeal that that decision.

01:51:19 Speaker 26: So through the legislative changes, and

01:51:22 Speaker 26: then soon we'll get to the

01:51:24 Speaker 26: regulations. Apologize for jumping around here.

01:51:26 Speaker 26: Through the legislative changes, staff had

01:51:28 Speaker 26: flagged, and it doesn't impact the

01:51:30 Speaker 26: county as directly because we don't

01:51:31 Speaker 26: deal with parkland dedication. But it

01:51:33 Speaker 26: doesn't impact our nine-member municipalities. That

01:51:35 Speaker 26: you could end up with with

01:51:37 Speaker 26: higher legal costs in terms of

01:51:38 Speaker 26: the agreements that might be needed

01:51:40 Speaker 26: in terms of accepting some of

01:51:43 Speaker 26: these already encumbered lands, or you

01:51:45 Speaker 26: could end up with higher legal

01:51:47 Speaker 26: and administrative costs if you were

01:51:49 Speaker 26: in a situation where a developer

01:51:51 Speaker 26: was pushing. you know, that fictional

01:51:52 Speaker 26: lands in the northeast corner, and

01:51:55 Speaker 26: the municipality otherwise didn't want them,

01:52:01 Speaker 26: and it went to the the

01:52:03 Speaker 26: Ontario Land Tribunal, and then so

01:52:06 Speaker 16: fast forward to to the actual

01:52:10 Speaker 16: regulations, the regulations sort of further

01:52:12 Speaker 16: enshrined some of this. The one

01:52:16 Speaker 16: thing it it did do through

01:52:26 Speaker 16: the regulations was it gave a

01:52:27 Speaker 26: further list of lands that are

01:52:29 Speaker 26: otherwise ineligible, so the developer can't

01:52:33 Speaker 26: even propose these lands, and and

01:52:37 Speaker 26: that included some common sense things

01:52:42 Speaker 26: that municipality. Common sense things that

01:52:45 Speaker 26: municipalities typically wouldn't have taken anyway,

01:52:49 Speaker 26: things like contaminated lands, has hazard

01:52:50 Speaker 26: lands, certain sensitive natural heritage lands.

01:52:51 Speaker 26: In that regard, the final thing

01:52:54 Speaker 26: I'll say, then happy to take

01:52:56 Speaker 26: any questions, is the the the

01:52:57 Speaker 26: regulation also speaks to community benefit

01:52:59 Speaker 26: charges. Community benefit charges aren't something

01:53:01 Speaker 26: we've seen adopted in Gray County

01:53:04 Speaker 26: per se. They were a replacement

01:53:06 Speaker 26: of the former bonusing provisions under

01:53:09 Speaker 26: Section 37 of the Planning Act,

01:53:11 Speaker 26: but community benefit charges only apply

01:53:14 Speaker 26: to to developments of five stories

01:53:17 Speaker 26: or greater, which exceed ten or

01:53:17 Speaker 26: more residential units. So, generally speaking,

01:53:19 Speaker 26: for most of our municipalities, we

01:53:21 Speaker 26: don't have a lot of five-story

01:53:23 Speaker 26: or greater buildings. And and even

01:53:25 Speaker 26: in those municipalities, perhaps like City

01:53:27 Speaker 26: of Mount Sound, where we do

01:53:29 Speaker 26: have some, you know, maybe it

01:53:31 Speaker 26: wasn't worth the time and effort

01:53:32 Speaker 26: to to institute those community benefit

01:53:35 Speaker 26: charges. So, if anything, was more

01:53:37 Speaker 26: impact. If anything, what's more impactful

01:53:38 Speaker 26: to to the nine member municipalities

01:53:40 Speaker 26: is is the parkland dedication. But

01:53:44 Speaker 26: like I said, the the legislation

01:53:47 Speaker 26: was already passed, and and this

01:53:50 Speaker 26: is just sort of the implementation

01:53:52 Speaker 26: tool through the the regulations. But

01:53:56 Speaker 26: certainly happy to take any questions

01:53:57 Speaker 18: if there are any. Thank you,

01:54:01 Speaker 18: Scott. You good, Councillor? You have

01:54:04 Speaker 18: any further questions? No. Any other

01:54:07 Speaker 18: questions from any Councillor Dubrein? Please.

01:54:09 Speaker 18: Thank you, and through you. to

01:54:12 Speaker 18: Scott, if you could elaborate on

01:54:14 Speaker 18: how a developer could require a

01:54:20 Speaker 27: municipality to assume privately owned parkland,

01:54:21 Speaker 27: POPS. Sure, through you, and and

01:54:26 Speaker 27: thank you for the question, Councillor

01:54:27 Speaker 27: Debrine. I'm certainly not an expert

01:54:30 Speaker 27: on this. Typically speaking, in the

01:54:32 Speaker 27: past, these these pops, as as

01:54:36 Speaker 27: the acronym is, were often associated

01:54:38 Speaker 27: with with a condominium development, or

01:54:41 Speaker 27: in some cases, you picture a

01:54:43 Speaker 27: you know a large skyscraper in

01:54:45 Speaker 27: downtown Toronto where they might kind

01:54:48 Speaker 27: of have an outdoor plaza. Anybody

01:54:50 Speaker 27: from the public can come and

01:54:53 Speaker 27: you know sit by the fountain

01:54:56 Speaker 27: or have their lunch or whatever

01:54:57 Speaker 27: else. But it is technically private

01:55:01 Speaker 27: land, and and so essentially what

01:55:04 Speaker 27: this does is it. it gives

01:55:05 Speaker 27: my understanding is it gives more

01:55:08 Speaker 27: flexibility to count that privately land

01:55:11 Speaker 27: private land that's sort of in

01:55:12 Speaker 27: the public realm as as part

01:55:14 Speaker 27: of your parkland dedication per se.

01:55:17 Speaker 27: I don't I don't know that

01:55:19 Speaker 27: it's necessarily saying and again I'm

01:55:21 Speaker 27: not research this in great detail

01:55:24 Speaker 27: that it's necessarily saying that the

01:55:26 Speaker 27: municipality would assume ownership. It just

01:55:27 Speaker 27: means it it counts against your

01:55:29 Speaker 18: five percent total, so it brings

01:55:33 Speaker 18: down the developer's needs to either

01:55:36 Speaker 18: pay cash in lieu to the

01:55:38 Speaker 18: municipality. of Parkland or or dedicate

01:55:42 Speaker 18: land directly, but if it's something

01:55:44 Speaker 18: council is interested, I could do

01:55:47 Speaker 18: some more research and give a

01:55:49 Speaker 18: more fulsome, long-winded answer, but just

01:55:52 Speaker 18: not today. You're good. Okay. Any

01:55:56 Speaker 18: other questions? I'll call the question.

01:55:59 Speaker 18: All those in favor? That is

01:56:00 Speaker 18: carried. Moving on to six B.

6.b Correspondence from the Town of Halton Hills - Modernizing Ontario's Invasive Plant Rules

Councillor Carlton moved a resolution supported by Councillor Debrine to adopt correspondence from the Town of Halton Hills requesting stricter provincial rules on invasive plant sales.

01:56:01 Speaker 18: Correspondents from the town of Halton

01:56:02 Speaker 18: Hills. The recommendation is to this.

01:56:04 Speaker 18: Correspondence be supported by Gray County,

01:56:08 Speaker 27: Councillor Carlton. You'll move that. Thank

01:56:11 Speaker 27: you. Is there a seconder, Councillor

01:56:13 Speaker 27: Debrine? Scott, you just want to

01:56:15 Speaker 27: be available for questions, okay? Councillor

01:56:16 Speaker 27: Carlton, please. Thank you, Deputy Warden.

01:56:18 Speaker 27: The reason I asked to have

01:56:19 Speaker 27: this supported is I spend a

01:56:22 Speaker 27: lot of time in the spring

01:56:23 Speaker 27: visiting different plant pop up. Pop-up

01:56:24 Speaker 27: sales places, and I see all

01:56:26 Speaker 27: these invasive species still being sold.

01:56:28 Speaker 27: And I know that in Georgian

01:56:30 Speaker 27: Bluffs, last year we allocated twenty

01:56:32 Speaker 27: thousand dollars, ten thousand of that

01:56:35 Speaker 27: to be used to map the

01:56:37 Speaker 27: invasive species within the township, ten

01:56:40 Speaker 27: thousand dollars for eradication. We had

01:56:41 Speaker 27: another ten thousand dollars this year.

01:56:44 Speaker 27: I reached out to Gray Sable,

01:56:46 Speaker 27: and they are doing a lot

01:56:48 Speaker 27: of mature. Are doing a lot

01:56:50 Speaker 27: of removal there for wild chervil

01:56:51 Speaker 27: and fragmites. Georgian Bluffs, one of

01:56:53 Speaker 27: the issues that we have is

01:56:55 Speaker 27: with the giant hogweed. So there's

01:56:59 Speaker 27: a lot of money being spent,

01:57:01 Speaker 27: and I'm using the example of

01:57:03 Speaker 27: Grey Soblen, Georgian Bluffs. I would

01:57:05 Speaker 27: imagine every municipality throughout Ontario is

01:57:06 Speaker 27: facing that same thing. So I

01:57:08 Speaker 27: think we need support for that

01:57:09 Speaker 27: to get stricter rules in place

01:57:12 Speaker 27: around these plants being sold in

01:57:13 Speaker 27: the future. So I'm just asking

01:57:15 Speaker 27: for county council support there. Thank

01:57:19 Speaker 27: you. Thank you. Any other speakers?

01:57:21 Speaker 27: Questions? Not seeing any. I'll call

01:57:26 Speaker 27: the question. All those in favor?

01:57:31 Speaker 27: That's carried. Thank you. Moving on

01:57:33 Speaker 27: to six D, which is correspondence

6.d Correspondence from Lyssa Ireton - Grey Road 1 Concerns

The correspondence raised concerns regarding speeding and poor pavement markings along Grey Road One, suggesting the installation of black cat speed change indicators or radar trailers to alert drivers.

01:57:39 Speaker 28: from Liza Ireton. I think I

01:57:42 Speaker 28: said that right. Gray Road One

01:57:44 Speaker 28: concerns. Councilor Carlton, you're prepared to

01:57:45 Speaker 28: move that as well. Support. Seconder.

01:57:48 Speaker 28: Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Councillor Carlton.

01:57:50 Speaker 28: You wish to speak to it,

01:57:52 Speaker 28: or Pat? Do you want to

01:57:53 Speaker 28: speak first, or do you want

01:57:56 Speaker 28: to be available for questions? Questions,

01:57:59 Speaker 28: okay. Councillor Carlton. Thank you, Deputy

01:58:01 Speaker 28: Warden. Again, this one yesterday, I

01:58:02 Speaker 28: went for a drive to just

01:58:04 Speaker 28: see what the speed limits are,

01:58:05 Speaker 28: and is it is a sixty

01:58:07 Speaker 28: kilometer all the way through there?

01:58:08 Speaker 28: I know there is an issue

01:58:09 Speaker 28: with people speeding, and there are

01:58:12 Speaker 28: a lot of residents along the

01:58:15 Speaker 28: side. Now, the one thing I

01:58:17 Speaker 28: didn't notice was what are the

01:58:19 Speaker 28: pavement markings there. So, I guess

01:58:20 Speaker 28: what I'm asking is, could we

01:58:21 Speaker 28: take a look at that? Even

01:58:23 Speaker 28: some the black cat speed change,

01:58:25 Speaker 28: just to notify people you're going

01:58:26 Speaker 28: too fast, slow down because we're

01:58:28 Speaker 28: seeing so much of this near

01:58:30 Speaker 28: accidents with people driving so fast.

01:58:32 Speaker 28: And I'll use an example of

01:58:33 Speaker 28: recently. I was down to Markdale

01:58:34 Speaker 28: on a Sunday morning, and on

01:58:36 Speaker 28: the way down, and on the

01:58:39 Speaker 28: way back. both times I was

01:58:40 Speaker 28: passed by somebody when I was

01:58:42 Speaker 28: on a double line, and approaching

01:58:43 Speaker 28: a hill. So dangerous situations. And

01:58:45 Speaker 28: is there any way we can,

01:58:47 Speaker 28: I don't know, highlight this? And

01:58:48 Speaker 28: I think we're already doing what

01:58:50 Speaker 28: we can, but I didn't pay

01:58:52 Speaker 28: attention to pavement markings. So I'm

01:58:54 Speaker 28: just asking if somebody can speak

01:58:55 Speaker 28: to it, or if there's anything

01:58:57 Speaker 28: we can do to alert drivers

01:58:58 Speaker 28: to this. Thank you. I might

01:58:59 Speaker 28: think the obvious solution would be.

01:59:01 Speaker 28: that you guys. Did somebody say

01:59:03 Speaker 28: take it over? No, sorry, just

01:59:04 Speaker 28: just thinking out loud. Pat,

01:59:06 Speaker 28: do you want to speak to

01:59:08 Speaker 28: that, please? Yes, I guess first

01:59:09 Speaker 28: thing I'd like to thank Ms.

01:59:11 Speaker 28: Ireton for bringing this to our

01:59:12 Speaker 28: attention. We get requests like this

01:59:13 Speaker 28: pretty frequently, and I don't have.

01:59:17 Speaker 28: a data directly in that area

01:59:20 Speaker 28: on speed, but I I don't

01:59:21 Speaker 28: doubt she's correct. 99% of areas

01:59:23 Speaker 28: have speeding issues. People don't necessarily

01:59:25 Speaker 28: adhere to the signs. It is

01:59:29 Speaker 28: a 60 along there, but the

01:59:35 Speaker 18: visibility is quite good, so it's

01:59:37 Speaker 18: not a surprise that people are

01:59:41 Speaker 18: probably going faster than the posted

01:59:42 Speaker 18: speed. So what we typically do

01:59:43 Speaker 18: in a in a request like

01:59:45 Speaker 18: this is we would take up

01:59:47 Speaker 18: our our variable or our radar

01:59:50 Speaker 18: trailer that tells people how fast

01:59:51 Speaker 18: they're going. As far as that

01:59:53 Speaker 18: would give us just a little

01:59:57 Speaker 18: more thorough data, which I'm sure

01:59:59 Speaker 18: will save people from speeding. And

02:00:02 Speaker 18: as far as a permanent sign,

02:00:06 Speaker 20: I think the county has four

02:00:08 Speaker 20: now, but they've all been paid

02:00:09 Speaker 20: for by community groups. They're just

02:00:12 Speaker 20: so cost prohibitive. People tend to

02:00:19 Speaker 29: want them everywhere. I think the

02:00:21 Speaker 29: people that want them probably pay

02:00:22 Speaker 29: attention to the sign, but it

02:00:24 Speaker 29: seems like anordinate amount of people

02:00:26 Speaker 29: don't. So we would take

02:00:28 Speaker 29: our trailer up there, get some

02:00:30 Speaker 29: more speed. We would forward on

02:00:33 Speaker 29: the OPP about the enforcement piece,

02:00:35 Speaker 29: since that is not you know

02:00:36 Speaker 29: in our duty. You know, in

02:00:38 Speaker 29: our duties, and then we'd get

02:00:46 Speaker 29: a hold of Miss Ireton and

02:00:49 Speaker 29: see what she has to say.

02:00:52 Speaker 30: But again, even passing no passing

02:00:57 Speaker 30: zones, you know, in Ontario, you

02:00:58 Speaker 30: can you can pass, you know,

02:01:01 Speaker 30: against the line unless you have

02:01:02 Speaker 30: another bylaw. So we'll look into

02:01:05 Speaker 30: all the warrants in the area

02:01:06 Speaker 30: just to see there is paved

02:01:11 Speaker 30: shoulders there, which you know have

02:01:13 Speaker 30: a little more safety for cyclists

02:01:15 Speaker 30: and pedestrians theoretically than other places.

02:01:17 Speaker 29: But we'll have a look at

02:01:19 Speaker 29: it and talk to Miss Ireton

02:01:21 Speaker 29: and just get some more feedback

02:01:23 Speaker 29: on what we could possibly do

02:01:25 Speaker 29: there if anything. Thank you, Pat.

02:01:27 Speaker 29: Good. Any other questions on that

02:01:30 Speaker 29: one? Not seeing any. I call

02:01:31 Speaker 31: the question. All those in favor?

02:01:41 Speaker 20: That's carried. Thank you. Moving on

02:01:43 Speaker 20: to six E. Award of special

6.e CSR-CW-17-26 Award of Special Needs Resourcing

Councilor Eccles moved support for the Special Needs Resourcing Program award of $1.4 million in operational funding. This provincial funding is designed to stabilize and increase activities without impacting the existing budget.

02:01:44 Speaker 20: needs resourcing. Councilor Eccles, you're prepared

02:01:49 Speaker 20: to move support of that. Okay.

02:01:52 Speaker 20: Is there second, or Councilor Bordignon

02:01:56 Speaker 20: and Marie? Do you want to

02:01:58 Speaker 20: speak to that first, or all?

02:02:02 Speaker 20: Speak to that first, or oh,

02:02:03 Speaker 20: okay, Tara. Tara's going to speak

02:02:05 Speaker 20: to that. Excellent. The floor is

02:02:08 Speaker 20: yours, Tara. Welcome. Thank you. Good

02:02:10 Speaker 20: morning, Council Three Warden, or sorry,

02:02:15 Speaker 20: Deputy Warden. I'm happy to take

02:02:18 Speaker 20: any questions about this report. Very

02:02:20 Speaker 20: good. My kind of report. Councilor

02:02:22 Speaker 20: Ackles, did you have a specific

02:02:26 Speaker 20: question? Uh, yes. Through you to

02:02:30 Speaker 20: Tara. So the operational funding is

02:02:33 Speaker 20: 1.4 million. How much is that

02:02:35 Speaker 20: added on to our budget, or

02:02:38 Speaker 20: is To our budgeters, that flow

02:02:40 Speaker 20: through funding. Through Deputy Gordon, that

02:02:43 Speaker 20: is completely within our existing budget,

02:02:45 Speaker 20: so there's no impact. We have

02:02:48 Speaker 32: just had some savings in other

02:02:52 Speaker 32: budgets last year, so we prioritize

02:02:55 Speaker 32: supporting the special needs resourcing funding.

02:02:56 Speaker 32: So I believe this year was

02:02:59 Speaker 32: 1.2, based on community need. We

02:03:02 Speaker 32: had the surplus funding in our

02:03:03 Speaker 32: local priorities funding from the province

02:03:05 Speaker 32: to support this increase and go

02:03:07 Speaker 32: to the single source. So we've

02:03:08 Speaker 32: got a bit of a reserve

02:03:10 Speaker 32: to cover it for 2026 or

02:03:12 Speaker 32: 2027. Will that continue? 1.4 million

02:03:13 Speaker 32: is a fairly large. We've got

02:03:15 Speaker 32: some surpluses. I guess I thought

02:03:17 Speaker 32: was adding it. And how are

02:03:18 Speaker 32: we going to? Is it totally

02:03:19 Speaker 32: funded, or is it funded from

02:03:22 Speaker 32: the taxpayers of Gray County? Of

02:03:23 Speaker 32: Grey County. So this is completely

02:03:25 Speaker 32: funded through our provincial budget. We

02:03:28 Speaker 32: actually returned funds in 2025, and

02:03:31 Speaker 32: we would like to maximize our

02:03:34 Speaker 32: utilization of those provincial funds. So

02:03:35 Speaker 32: again, we haven't had to decrease

02:03:37 Speaker 32: any programming. This is just allowing

02:03:39 Speaker 32: us to stabilize and increase our

02:03:43 Speaker 32: activities through the Special Needs Resourcing

02:03:47 Speaker 32: Program as part of what we

02:03:49 Speaker 32: found through our review of the

02:03:50 Speaker 32: program. I think we just had

02:03:52 Speaker 32: a conversation a few minutes ago.

02:03:54 Speaker 32: It was a question from Councillor

02:03:59 Speaker 32: Debrine. This is absolutely written in

02:04:03 Speaker 32: stone that we'll continue to get

02:04:05 Speaker 29: these. I'm thinking a number of

02:04:07 Speaker 29: years ago we got into something

02:04:09 Speaker 29: called long-term care that was going

02:04:11 Speaker 29: to be totally funded. It wouldn't

02:04:15 Speaker 29: be on the taxpayers and. today,

02:04:18 Speaker 33: what north of nine million dollars

02:04:20 Speaker 33: of Gray County taxpayers' money that

02:04:22 Speaker 33: flows into that? No question, you

02:04:23 Speaker 33: know, it's it's a need, but

02:04:25 Speaker 33: it goes back to that philosophical:

02:04:28 Speaker 33: is it something that the property

02:04:30 Speaker 33: taxpayers need, and the thought of

02:04:32 Speaker 33: getting into it, and then ending

02:04:34 Speaker 33: up, no way of getting out

02:04:36 Speaker 33: of it, and continuously putting a

02:04:38 Speaker 33: burden on the rural taxpayers of

02:04:39 Speaker 33: Gray County. I can see that

02:04:41 Speaker 33: Miss Shaw has her hand waving

02:04:43 Speaker 33: over there, willing to jump in.

02:04:45 Speaker 33: Emory, you want to respond, please.

02:04:47 Speaker 33: Through you, Deputy Board. So special

02:04:49 Speaker 33: needs resourcing. So we have a

02:04:51 Speaker 33: number of children in our daycare

02:04:53 Speaker 33: centers, childcare centers that require assistance,

02:04:56 Speaker 33: and so we run a. program

02:04:59 Speaker 33: on behalf of the province in

02:05:01 Speaker 33: order to provide that assistance in

02:05:02 Speaker 33: the classroom for people for children

02:05:04 Speaker 33: with special needs. We've been doing

02:05:06 Speaker 33: it for years; it's not a

02:05:09 Speaker 33: new program. What we did do

02:05:12 Speaker 33: is we had a review done

02:05:15 Speaker 33: of the program to determine what

02:05:17 Speaker 33: where we were lacking, what we

02:05:20 Speaker 33: needed, and we know that there

02:05:23 Speaker 18: has been an increase in need.

02:05:24 Speaker 18: So we were able to, as

02:05:29 Speaker 18: Tara said, take some funding from

02:05:32 Speaker 18: other areas within our provincial budget

02:05:35 Speaker 18: or provincial funding and put it

02:05:40 Speaker 18: towards more towards. special needs, and

02:05:42 Speaker 18: then we were also, as part

02:05:44 Speaker 18: of the review, it was recommended

02:05:46 Speaker 18: that we go to one provider

02:05:53 Speaker 18: versus multiple, just for some consistency

02:05:54 Speaker 34: and some, you know, better outcomes.

02:05:58 Speaker 34: Hopefully, within it, so it's something

02:05:59 Speaker 34: that we are mandated to do,

02:06:01 Speaker 34: and it is part of our

02:06:06 Speaker 34: early learning and childcare services that

02:06:11 Speaker 34: we provide for Gray County. Thank

02:06:13 Speaker 34: you, Emory. Good. Oh, two. Good.

02:06:15 Speaker 34: Oh, Tara, go ahead. Just to

02:06:16 Speaker 34: add on to Ann Marie's comments

02:06:19 Speaker 34: as well, the contracts are annualized,

02:06:22 Speaker 34: so we do review our funding

02:06:23 Speaker 34: availability annually, and the service providers

02:06:27 Speaker 34: aware of that too. Very good,

02:06:31 Speaker 34: Councilor Gregg. Just want to thank

02:06:34 Speaker 34: Councilor Eccles for actually holding this

02:06:37 Speaker 34: item so that you could ask

02:06:41 Speaker 34: a question. This is in sitting

02:06:44 Speaker 34: on the Community Services Committee this

02:06:46 Speaker 34: year. This highlights a service. that

02:06:49 Speaker 34: the county provides that I didn't

02:06:50 Speaker 34: know anything about until sitting on

02:06:53 Speaker 34: community services. So this is a

02:06:57 Speaker 34: report here that I'm glad you

02:06:59 Speaker 34: pulled because it's a heightened opportunity

02:07:01 Speaker 34: for council to become more familiar

02:07:03 Speaker 34: with various levels of service that

02:07:07 Speaker 34: we provide, whether it's the tax

02:07:09 Speaker 34: levy or whether it's flow through

02:07:14 Speaker 34: provincial funding like this. But certainly,

02:07:16 Speaker 34: I've learned a lot just in

02:07:18 Speaker 34: the last couple meetings after going

02:07:19 Speaker 34: through a think a consultant in

02:07:22 Speaker 34: place to examine the service provision

02:07:26 Speaker 34: levels that we. were going with,

02:07:30 Speaker 34: and the opportunities for improvement. So,

02:07:33 Speaker 34: thanks for being able to speak

02:07:35 Speaker 34: to it today, Ter, and to

02:07:36 Speaker 34: Councilor Echoes for pulling it and

02:07:38 Speaker 34: heightened awareness of Council of the

02:07:39 Speaker 34: work that's done here. Thank you,

02:07:41 Speaker 34: Scott. Any other questions? I'll call

02:07:43 Speaker 34: the question. All those in favor?

02:07:46 Speaker 34: That is carried. Thank you. Moving

02:07:48 Speaker 34: on to the final poll item,

02:07:50 Speaker 34: which is six F. It is

02:07:52 Speaker 34: a report on Gray County Official

02:07:54 Speaker 34: Plan Amendment Thirty Two, Wilton Sanitation.

02:07:57 Speaker 34: Cassandra, Cassandra is here, Dilman, to

02:08:00 Speaker 34: speak to it. Councilor Ackles, you'll

02:08:03 Speaker 34: move. What is the recommendation? Be

02:08:05 Speaker 34: received for information. You're moving that.

02:08:07 Speaker 34: Is there a seconder, Councilor McQueen?

02:08:09 Speaker 34: Thank you, Cassandra. Please. Thank you,

02:08:11 Speaker 34: and I think it's afternoon. now,

02:08:19 Speaker 34: so I'll say good afternoon. As

02:08:21 Speaker 34: mentioned, my name is Cassandra Dolman,

02:08:25 Speaker 34: and I'm the county planner assigned

02:08:27 Speaker 34: to this file. OPA 32, Wilt

02:08:30 Speaker 34: and Sanitation. The lands are located

02:08:32 Speaker 34: on the north side of Gray

02:08:35 Speaker 34: Road 4. I think I might

02:08:38 Speaker 34: have the wrong property address, and

02:08:41 Speaker 35: there, apologies for that. The property

02:08:51 Speaker 34: is 33 hectares. The agent is

02:08:55 Speaker 34: Ron Davis. The agent is Ron

02:08:57 Speaker 34: Davidson, and that is the correct

02:09:00 Speaker 34: proposal. So apologies for that. So

02:09:02 Speaker 34: we are located approximately 650 meters

02:09:07 Speaker 34: west of Sealand, if that makes

02:09:09 Speaker 34: sense there. And the property, 33

02:09:12 Speaker 34: hectares, or about 81 acres in

6.f PDR-CW-29-26 Grey County Official Plan Amendment 32 - Wilton Sanitation

The applicant proposes a site-specific exemption to Grey County's Official Plan for their agricultural property at Wilton Sanitation, allowing an on-farm diversified use compared to the standard two percent limit.

02:09:21 Speaker 34: size. On the property, the there's

02:09:22 Speaker 34: a the applicant has their house

02:09:25 Speaker 34: and a detached garage, along with

02:09:28 Speaker 34: a workshop and the outdoor. storage

02:09:31 Speaker 34: area associated with the existing business

02:09:34 Speaker 34: on site, Wilton Sanitation. There's a

02:09:36 Speaker 34: buffer area of trees. It's a

02:09:38 Speaker 34: little hard to see here, but

02:09:42 Speaker 34: if you've driven past, there is

02:09:44 Speaker 34: a pretty thick mature trees that

02:09:47 Speaker 34: run along the entire property frontage

02:09:48 Speaker 20: of Great Road Court. I can

02:09:52 Speaker 20: also mention here that there was

02:09:54 Speaker 20: a local official plan amendment received

02:09:56 Speaker 20: and a zoning bylaw. amendment received

02:09:59 Speaker 20: by Grey Highlands, and there is

02:10:04 Speaker 20: a public planning meeting scheduled for

02:10:06 Speaker 20: the end of August. In terms

02:10:13 Speaker 20: of the site plan, so we

02:10:15 Speaker 20: have a couple different colors on

02:10:17 Speaker 20: the screen. I've tried to outline

02:10:20 Speaker 20: some of that on the side

02:10:24 Speaker 20: there. So there is in green;

02:10:26 Speaker 20: those are the agricultural uses currently

02:10:30 Speaker 20: on the site, and the lands

02:10:33 Speaker 20: are actively in cultivation. Then there

02:10:35 Speaker 20: is also And there is also

02:10:37 Speaker 20: that blue and orange area. So

02:10:40 Speaker 20: some of that being outdoor storage,

02:10:41 Speaker 20: and then the orange indoor storage.

02:10:48 Speaker 20: That's where the office and things

02:10:58 Speaker 34: like that are. Then there's also

02:11:00 Speaker 34: the pink, which that is the

02:11:04 Speaker 34: proposed expansion area. And I'll get

02:11:10 Speaker 34: into the details of that official

02:11:11 Speaker 34: plan amendment, but just to show

02:11:14 Speaker 34: you what's existing and the area

02:11:16 Speaker 34: that is proposed there. So, the

02:11:18 Speaker 34: proposed official plan amendment would facilitate

02:11:21 Speaker 34: the construction of a holding tank

02:11:24 Speaker 34: for hauled sewage and waste from

02:11:26 Speaker 34: septic system holding tanks, and it

02:11:31 Speaker 34: would recognize that existing on-farm business.

02:11:34 Speaker 34: So, the property is designated agricultural

02:11:35 Speaker 34: in the county official plan, and

02:11:37 Speaker 34: it the proposal is to add

02:11:39 Speaker 34: a site-specific exemption to that property.

02:11:42 Speaker 34: The property right now, an on-farm

02:11:45 Speaker 34: diversified use, is permitted to occupy

02:11:47 Speaker 34: up to two percent of that

02:11:53 Speaker 34: property size. So that's about that

02:11:55 Speaker 34: six thousand six hundred meters squared.

02:11:57 Speaker 34: Proposed is that eight thousand six

02:11:59 Speaker 34: hundred figure on the screen. So

02:12:01 Speaker 34: that's about two point six percent.

02:12:02 Speaker 34: 2.6% of the total property size.

02:12:05 Speaker 34: The wording of the official plan

02:12:10 Speaker 34: amendment, but I will just go

02:12:14 Speaker 34: forward to the recommendation. And at

02:12:18 Speaker 34: this stage, it is recommended to

02:12:21 Speaker 34: receive for information. Please let me

02:12:24 Speaker 34: know if you have any questions.

02:12:25 Speaker 06: Thank you, Cassandra. Councilor Nichols, your

02:12:28 Speaker 06: question or comments, please. It was

02:12:31 Speaker 06: a question. It's a question that

02:12:31 Speaker 06: was noted in here that, and

02:12:33 Speaker 06: I'm sorry I can't find the

02:12:34 Speaker 06: exact page right now. That the

02:12:37 Speaker 06: road allowance that goes off there,

02:12:38 Speaker 06: obviously at six corners, and the

02:12:41 Speaker 06: road allowance that goes north. That

02:12:44 Speaker 06: the applicant owned the road allowance,

02:12:47 Speaker 06: and I know that in Grey

02:12:49 Speaker 06: Highlands there was quite a. dispute

02:12:51 Speaker 06: on the road allowance and everything

02:12:52 Speaker 06: a little while ago with the

02:12:54 Speaker 06: applicant and a couple of other

02:12:57 Speaker 06: individuals on ownership, and and just

02:12:58 Speaker 06: that's what sparked my reasoning for

02:13:00 Speaker 06: this was who I will I

02:13:01 Speaker 06: will correct in determining that the

02:13:04 Speaker 06: road is owned by or the

02:13:06 Speaker 06: portion of the road that is

02:13:06 Speaker 06: following along on the Wilt. Along

02:13:09 Speaker 06: on the Wilton property on the

02:13:11 Speaker 06: west side is owned by the

02:13:13 Speaker 06: Wiltons. Has that been totally set

02:13:15 Speaker 06: aside, Sandra? Do you please? Did

02:13:16 Speaker 06: that? That sounds much better. There,

02:13:19 Speaker 06: the thank you for the the

02:13:22 Speaker 06: question there on. the the intersection

02:13:24 Speaker 06: that we're talking about, it's a

02:13:27 Speaker 06: little bit difficult when there is

02:13:29 Speaker 06: six corners. Is how the the

02:13:30 Speaker 06: prop how that intersection is known

02:13:32 Speaker 06: locally. There are five, but the

02:13:34 Speaker 06: six being this unopened road allowance.

02:13:35 Speaker 06: So if you can sort of

02:13:37 Speaker 06: take a line there through. I'm

02:13:38 Speaker 06: trying to orient myself here. Can

02:13:41 Speaker 06: anyone see? I can't even do

02:13:42 Speaker 06: this on my on. my mouse.

02:13:43 Speaker 06: There is a road allowance there

02:13:45 Speaker 06: on the west side of that

02:13:47 Speaker 06: entire property, going straight going north.

02:13:49 Speaker 06: As far as I understand, it

02:13:52 Speaker 06: is in the the same ownership.

02:13:54 Speaker 06: The Wiltons also own the lands

02:13:55 Speaker 06: to the to the west, so

02:13:59 Speaker 06: that entire parcel as well to

02:14:01 Speaker 06: the west. They have they have

02:14:02 Speaker 06: not, as I as far as

02:14:03 Speaker 06: I understand, merged on title, but.

02:14:06 Speaker 06: those two properties are separate. There.

02:14:07 Speaker 06: Let me let me zoom in.

02:14:08 Speaker 06: Then. Any other, Councillor McQueen. So

02:14:11 Speaker 06: thanks to you, Mister Deputy Warden,

02:14:12 Speaker 06: following up with Councillor Eccles. So

02:14:14 Speaker 06: there was a file that came

02:14:15 Speaker 06: to the Committee of Adjustment on

02:14:17 Speaker 06: the on the back portion road

02:14:20 Speaker 06: allowance. Should we slide it down

02:14:22 Speaker 06: a little bit? You see how

02:14:23 Speaker 06: the Down a little bit, you

02:14:27 Speaker 06: see how it goes further north.

02:14:29 Speaker 06: There's just a little strip, and

02:14:30 Speaker 06: that actually was that that road

02:14:34 Speaker 06: allowance is in private ownership. It's

02:14:36 Speaker 06: been sold a couple times, and

02:14:37 Speaker 06: then this previous owner was doing

02:14:40 Speaker 06: a minor variance to put a

02:14:41 Speaker 26: house. That that's beside the point.

02:14:44 Speaker 26: I sort of wonder though if

02:14:45 Speaker 26: the road allowance that goes beside

02:14:46 Speaker 26: Mr. Weldon is owned by him.

02:14:48 Speaker 26: I'm trying to go back to

02:14:49 Speaker 26: the file of the committee of

02:14:51 Speaker 26: adjustment to give me that information.

02:14:53 Speaker 26: I'm just trying to. search it,

02:14:55 Speaker 26: and but I so I find

02:14:57 Speaker 26: that I can't tell it because

02:14:59 Speaker 26: it would have been on the

02:15:00 Speaker 26: application of that particular road allowance.

02:15:03 Speaker 26: But I I sort of feel

02:15:05 Speaker 26: that it stops at the Wilton

02:15:07 Speaker 26: property because see what happened was

02:15:08 Speaker 26: back in Ardemisia days in 1975

02:15:09 Speaker 26: or thereabouts. Somehow in the wisdom

02:15:12 Speaker 26: of Ardemisia, they decided to deem

02:15:13 Speaker 26: that surplus and they sold it

02:15:15 Speaker 26: off, right? And so I I'm

02:15:18 Speaker 26: sort of thinking that that portion

02:15:20 Speaker 26: that. goes besides the lot and

02:15:23 Speaker 26: property is in their ownership, but

02:15:24 Speaker 26: like I said, I will do

02:15:27 Speaker 26: some time to do a bit

02:15:32 Speaker 18: of research on that file. I'm

02:15:34 Speaker 18: trying to think that committee adjustment

02:15:37 Speaker 18: file came up. I went through

02:15:40 Speaker 18: June. I went through July, so

02:15:42 Speaker 18: I'm just sort of going through

02:15:45 Speaker 18: that because if I could find

02:15:46 Speaker 18: that file, then it would tell

02:15:48 Speaker 18: exactly what the other piece was

02:15:49 Speaker 18: through the application through the committee

02:15:51 Speaker 18: adjustment for minor variance. So, so

02:15:54 Speaker 18: I can say at

02:15:57 Speaker 18: this point until I determine that,

02:16:00 Speaker 18: but. my my opinion is

02:16:02 Speaker 18: I think he probably

02:16:04 Speaker 18: owns it because it was deemed

02:16:06 Speaker 18: surplus, so it's not owned by

02:16:08 Speaker 18: the township or the municipality. I

02:16:11 Speaker 18: say township, I didn't mean at

02:16:13 Speaker 18: the time. They deemed it surplus,

02:16:16 Speaker 18: so so it's not the municipality. I guess the one in question is, and I don't think that actually, if I could find that application, it would it would determine how far that application was of that application for minor variance on the application of that road allowance that is north of. Mr. Wilton's property, but I can't determine that till I find that file. So, for the purposes of the application, I'm not sure it has any bearing who owns that unopened road allowance, does it? Scott, do you want to comment? I saw your hand there. Sorry, through you. I was just going to say that staff can do some more research into this and and get a more definitive answer. We'll work with Grayhound staff prior to bringing back a final report, as Cassandra said that the the landowner does own. sort of what you see on on the screen there, highlighted in teal, and the larger property to the west. If if if that road allowance was owned still by the municipality or someone else, then it might be more of an issue in terms of are there any of the the landowner's operations on that former road allowance? But we're happy to look into this further and bring it back. Okay, because the motion is just to receive for information at this point. Any other questions? Call the. question. All those in favor? That's carried. Thank you so much, everyone. So that concludes those. So we have the closed meeting matters. Lunch is going to be here at twelve fifteen. So no, no pressure. But we'll move her along here. So the motion is that the committee of the whole does now go into closed session pursuant section two three nine of the Municipal Act two thousand one as amended to discuss. advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, specifically legal advice on a bylaw, and two litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals affecting the municipality or local board, and this is specifically an OLT matter. Someone move that, Councillor Mackie, seconded by Councillor Pringle. All those in favor? That is carried. And I'm not sure what staff.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.