Grey County Committee Meeting Transcript — November 20, 2025

Hook: Playground Relocation Due To Budget Constraints

Grey County · Committee · November 20, 2025

Summary

The Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee met on November 20, 2025, to review accessibility projects, playground designs, and municipal site plan approvals. Staff presented design concepts for Georgian Bluffs playgrounds, security upgrades for West Grey facilities, and updates on regional infrastructure improvements, with the committee accepting several reports for information only.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
Committee
Date
November 20, 2025
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order, no declarations of interest were made, and there are currently no delegations present.

00:00:13 Speaker 01: to call the meeting to order.

00:00:16 Speaker 01: The first item on the agenda

00:00:18 Speaker 01: is declaration of interest. Does anyone

00:00:20 Speaker 02: have any declarations of interest? Anyone?

00:00:29 Speaker 02: Okay. we do not have any

00:00:32 Speaker 02: delegations today, and we'll start with

00:00:36 Speaker 02: our items for direction or discussion.

00:00:40 Speaker 02: At the moment, we do not

00:00:42 Speaker 02: have quorum, so we'll move along

00:00:44 Speaker 02: with the items in the agenda.

5 Correspondence

A speaker mentioned moving to item.

00:00:47 Speaker 02: We're going to move to correspondence

00:00:50 Speaker 02: first, and we'll move to item

5.b CEMC Collaborative - Call for Comments

The CEMC Collaborative item was introduced by a speaker who handed it over to Deputy Clerk Brittany. The speaker informed the committee that the CRTC is improving the National Public Alerting System but noted that public opinion research shows the system is not accessible to persons with disabilities. The commission is seeking comments identifying barriers for persons with disabilities and potential solutions, which can be submitted individually through the CRTC's engagement platform.

00:00:52 Speaker 02: number five B, the CEMC Collabourative.

00:00:58 Speaker 02: and I will hand this over

00:01:00 Speaker 02: to Brittany, our deputy clerk for

00:01:02 Speaker 03: the Grey County. Perfect. Thank you,

00:01:05 Speaker 03: Chair Schultz, and through you, I'd

00:01:07 Speaker 03: just like to share that the

00:01:08 Speaker 04: CRTC, which is the Canadian Radio,

00:01:10 Speaker 04: Television, and Telecommunications Commission, are

00:01:14 Speaker 04: making improvements to the National Public

00:01:16 Speaker 04: Alerting System. This system allows emergency

00:01:20 Speaker 04: management officials across Canada to warn

00:01:23 Speaker 04: the public about emergency situations. The

00:01:26 Speaker 04: alerts and warnings. that you get

00:01:27 Speaker 04: on your phone, where there is

00:01:28 Speaker 04: an emergency, threat of emergency, weather

00:01:31 Speaker 04: warnings, and amber alerts, are part

00:01:33 Speaker 04: of this alerting system. Public opinion

00:01:36 Speaker 04: research has shown that this alerting

00:01:37 Speaker 04: system is not accessible to persons

00:01:40 Speaker 04: with disabilities. So the commission is

00:01:42 Speaker 04: looking for comments that identify barriers

00:01:44 Speaker 04: for persons with disabilities and what

00:01:47 Speaker 04: the commission can do to prevent

00:01:48 Speaker 04: these barriers. If you have comments

00:01:51 Speaker 04: to share, you can provide comments

00:01:52 Speaker 04: individually through the CRTC's engagement.

00:01:55 Speaker 04: platform, titled CRTC Conversations, and all

00:02:00 Speaker 04: submissions will become part of the

00:02:01 Speaker 04: public record. So I'd just like

00:02:03 Speaker 04: to share this, and I will

00:02:05 Speaker 04: send an email out after this

00:02:07 Speaker 04: meeting to the members to give

00:02:09 Speaker 04: them the link to that website

00:02:12 Speaker 04: where they can submit their submissions.

00:02:15 Speaker 05: Okay, thank you, Brittany. Thank you.

00:02:19 Speaker 05: So the next item on the

4.a Township of Georgian Bluffs - Kemble and Sarawak Playground Design Concepts (Brittany Drury)

The Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee received a report on design concepts for playground improvements at Sarawak Family Park and a new park in Campbell. The Township of Georgian Bluffs proposed installing rubberized play surfaces at Sarawak to enhance accessibility, while relocating an existing structure from Sarawak to Campbell due to budget restrictions requiring engineered wood fiber there. A landscape design consultant was onboarded to ensure compliance with AODA standards, and the committee was invited to provide feedback before the issuance of a Request for Proposal.

00:02:21 Speaker 02: agenda is item number four a.

00:02:23 Speaker 02: Township of Georgian Bluffs, Kemble and

00:02:27 Speaker 02: Sarawak Playground Design Concepts, and I

00:02:33 Speaker 02: will hand this over for discussion

00:02:35 Speaker 02: to Brittany Drury, Deputy Cao slash

00:02:41 Speaker 02: Director of Corporate Services at the

00:02:44 Speaker 02: Township of Georgian Bluffs. Thank you

00:02:49 Speaker 02: very much, and through your chair

00:02:50 Speaker 06: Schultz, hello. This is one of

00:02:53 Speaker 07: my this advisory committee. So nice

00:02:56 Speaker 07: to see some familiar faces. And

00:02:58 Speaker 07: for those of you that don't

00:02:59 Speaker 08: know me, hi. So on today's

00:03:02 Speaker 09: agenda, you'll see a report as

00:03:05 Speaker 10: well as two draft design plans

00:03:08 Speaker 11: for two upcoming park improvement projects

00:03:11 Speaker 11: that the township has budgeted for

00:03:13 Speaker 12: in 2024. You'll also note that

00:03:16 Speaker 12: the township has been successful in

00:03:18 Speaker 12: our CSRIF funding application to. facilitate

00:03:21 Speaker 12: both of these two projects. So

00:03:22 Speaker 12: we're very excited to get these

00:03:24 Speaker 13: two things going. As also included

00:03:26 Speaker 14: in the report, and just as

00:03:29 Speaker 14: an asterisk, before we commenced discussions,

00:03:30 Speaker 15: we have onboarded a landscape design

00:03:34 Speaker 15: consultant to help us through the

00:03:37 Speaker 15: planning process. That has drafted these

00:03:39 Speaker 15: designs, both to be compliant with

00:03:41 Speaker 16: the AODA and Annex H of

00:03:44 Speaker 16: the Canadian Standard for the Safety

00:03:46 Speaker 17: of Public Equipment. So, with that,

00:03:50 Speaker 18: I'll go briefly through the both

00:03:54 Speaker 18: both designs briefly, as well as

00:03:57 Speaker 18: where they're located, just for the

00:03:59 Speaker 19: committee's information. So, the first is

00:04:01 Speaker 19: located at Sarawak Family Park, which

00:04:03 Speaker 19: is a small three-acre parcel that's

00:04:05 Speaker 19: located along Gray Road One, that's

00:04:07 Speaker 20: separated by both the water and

00:04:10 Speaker 21: the roadway. Over the course of

00:04:13 Speaker 21: the past five or so years,

00:04:14 Speaker 22: the township has undertaken various In

00:04:18 Speaker 23: various accessibility improvements projects at the

00:04:22 Speaker 23: park, so these proposed playground

00:04:25 Speaker 24: structure improvements are there to facilitate

00:04:27 Speaker 25: or further improve upon the overall

00:04:30 Speaker 25: accessibility of the park and the

00:04:32 Speaker 26: space. Sarawak Family Park is most

00:04:34 Speaker 26: definitely our most frequented park in

00:04:36 Speaker 27: the summer months, so you'll note

00:04:39 Speaker 27: that the plans that we have

00:04:41 Speaker 28: drafted there are quite exciting and

00:04:45 Speaker 28: colourful, and I'm going to use.

00:04:46 Speaker 28: the word "exciting" a lot because

00:04:47 Speaker 28: we're really excited to get it

00:04:50 Speaker 29: going. So the concepts have been

00:04:54 Speaker 29: attached as the first attachment to

00:04:55 Speaker 30: the report, and you'll note that

00:04:57 Speaker 31: it incorporates a rubberized play surface

00:05:00 Speaker 31: that connects all of the surfaces,

00:05:02 Speaker 31: including the parking lot and all

00:05:03 Speaker 32: of the surrounding trail points. We're

00:05:06 Speaker 33: doing some work to the the

00:05:08 Speaker 33: parking lot as well to ensure

00:05:10 Speaker 33: that it's fully connected to the

00:05:12 Speaker 34: park and the proposed play structure.

00:05:17 Speaker 34: The second location is a brand

00:05:19 Speaker 35: new park that's located in Campbell.

00:05:21 Speaker 36: That's the kind of most northern

00:05:24 Speaker 36: centre of population for the township

00:05:26 Speaker 36: of Georgian Bluffs. It hasn't had

00:05:28 Speaker 37: a playground for some time, and

00:05:31 Speaker 37: we are proposing to move it

00:05:32 Speaker 37: to a different space than it

00:05:34 Speaker 38: had been located before. I was

00:05:37 Speaker 38: not born and raised in Gray

00:05:38 Speaker 39: County, but I've heard a lot

00:05:40 Speaker 39: about pumpkin chucking that used to

00:05:42 Speaker 40: happen at the Campbell site. so

00:05:45 Speaker 41: we're trying to honour its local

00:05:49 Speaker 41: tie by relocating an existing playground

00:05:51 Speaker 42: structure to the community. So you'll

00:05:54 Speaker 42: see, as attached to the in

00:05:56 Speaker 42: the second appendix to the report,

00:05:58 Speaker 43: we're proposing that the existing structure,

00:06:01 Speaker 43: the playground structure at Sarawak Family

00:06:03 Speaker 44: Park that is there currently today,

00:06:07 Speaker 45: be relocated to the Campbell site.

00:06:10 Speaker 45: So we're we're proposing a reuse

00:06:13 Speaker 45: again to. Use again to to

00:06:15 Speaker 45: prioritize a bit of environmental sustainability

00:06:16 Speaker 46: as well, and keep the plastics

00:06:18 Speaker 46: out of the landfills. But with

00:06:21 Speaker 46: that being said, there are safety

00:06:22 Speaker 47: requirements that the township will be

00:06:26 Speaker 48: observing to have that playground relocated.

00:06:30 Speaker 49: The playground equipment at Sarawak is

00:06:32 Speaker 50: fully accessible per the standards that

00:06:34 Speaker 51: I've outlined earlier in the report,

00:06:39 Speaker 52: and I will flag that the

00:06:42 Speaker 53: proposed surface will. Closed surface will

00:06:45 Speaker 54: be engineered wood fiber rather than

00:06:48 Speaker 55: the rubberized surface, strictly because of

00:06:52 Speaker 56: budget restrictions. But with that, I

00:06:54 Speaker 56: welcome any and all feedback from

00:06:56 Speaker 57: the committee to inform final designs.

00:06:58 Speaker 57: These are by no means final

00:07:00 Speaker 57: designs. I wanted to ensure that

00:07:02 Speaker 58: we had feedback of the committee

00:07:05 Speaker 59: prior to issuing an RFP or

00:07:07 Speaker 60: moving forward with construction. So, through

00:07:23 Speaker 60: you, Chair Schultz, that's all I

00:07:40 Speaker 60: have. Oh, Chair Schults, you're on

00:07:41 Speaker 61: mute. There we go. Not used

00:07:46 Speaker 61: to using someone else's computer. Sorry

00:07:48 Speaker 02: about that. Okay. Yeah. So, does

00:07:52 Speaker 02: thank you, Brittany, for that presentation.

00:07:54 Speaker 02: And does any of our members

00:08:02 Speaker 02: have any questions or comments for

00:08:04 Speaker 02: Brittany? I can see why you

00:08:06 Speaker 02: would be excited, Brittany. The designs

00:08:07 Speaker 02: are wonderful. I took a good

00:08:12 Speaker 02: look at them, and the equipment

00:08:16 Speaker 02: is is really nice with the

00:08:23 Speaker 02: concept that you've presented. So, good

00:08:25 Speaker 62: luck with all of that. Thank

00:08:29 Speaker 63: you so much, and thank you.

00:08:35 Speaker 64: You're welcome. Does anyone have any

00:08:38 Speaker 65: comments or concerns for Brittany? No,

00:08:44 Speaker 65: okay. Thank you, Brittany. We appreciate

00:08:45 Speaker 02: it. Okay, we'll move on to

00:08:48 Speaker 02: the second item on the agenda,

00:08:51 Speaker 02: that is item number four D,

4.b Town of The Blue Mountains - Highway 26 and Grey Road 2 Improvements and Georgian Trail Realignment (Jennifer Patton)

Alex Plowman presented a project for the Town of the Blue Mountains and Ministry of Transportation to improve Highway 26 and Grey Road 2, which includes installing traffic signals, realigning Georgian Trail, adding a new north leg, and installing left turn lanes. A speaker described a proposed Lake Shore North trail leg profile featuring a 4.5-metre clear width with adjustable swing gates, paved rest areas at the Highway 26 intersection, and accessible pedestrian signals that meet or exceed Jordan Trail Act requirements. A participant requested clarification on dedicated left turning lanes, which the presenter confirmed would be installed in the eastbound direction while maintaining an existing westbound lane, alongside standard concrete barrier curbs and a five percent running slope on an existing portion of the Lake Shore Trail. Another speaker noted the lack of a formal motion for receipt and suggested postponing the report due to insufficient quorum, but another clarified that the current action is to accept the report for information only without decision-making, after which the chair proceeded with the presentation while inviting questions. The presentation also addressed municipal obligations under accessibility legislation regarding self-service kiosks, service counters, recreational trails, outdoor play spaces, rest areas, bus shelters, and on-demand accessible taxicabs, noting that municipalities must consult their accessibility advisory committees before constructing new facilities or making major changes to existing ones.

00:08:52 Speaker 02: sorry four B, and it is

00:08:54 Speaker 02: the Town of the Blue Mountains

00:08:57 Speaker 02: Highway Twenty Six and Gray Road

00:09:01 Speaker 02: Two improvements, and Georgian Trail realignment,

00:09:04 Speaker 02: and the staff person is Prathy

00:09:05 Speaker 02: Desai. Daze, manager of capital projects

00:09:09 Speaker 02: at the town of the Blue

00:09:13 Speaker 66: Mountains, with consultants Alex and Khalid

00:09:17 Speaker 67: from Iguess Group. And I hope

00:09:21 Speaker 67: I pronounced that properly. Oh yeah,

00:09:24 Speaker 67: that's that's okay. Yeah, it's Alex

00:09:25 Speaker 67: Plowman here from from Iguess, just

00:09:27 Speaker 67: presenting on behalf of the town

00:09:32 Speaker 67: and I guess the the Ministry

00:09:34 Speaker 67: of Transportation as well. Khalid. Clad

00:09:37 Speaker 67: was double booked this afternoon, so

00:09:40 Speaker 67: unfortunately he he couldn't make it.

00:09:42 Speaker 68: But I'll I can give the

00:09:47 Speaker 68: the presentation and kind of work

00:09:48 Speaker 68: walk through the the project here.

00:09:49 Speaker 67: So I will share my screen.

00:09:53 Speaker 67: I think I got it figured

00:09:58 Speaker 67: out how to. We usually use

00:10:00 Speaker 67: Microsoft Teams, but I I think

00:10:01 Speaker 67: this should work. How's that looking

00:10:06 Speaker 67: for everybody? Can we see the?

00:10:08 Speaker 67: It's looking. I see some thumbs

00:10:11 Speaker 67: up. That's great. All right. Well,

00:10:14 Speaker 67: thanks everybody. As I mentioned earlier,

00:10:17 Speaker 67: my name is Alex Plowman, presenting

00:10:19 Speaker 67: this from from me. Just consulting

00:10:23 Speaker 67: on behalf of the the Ministry

00:10:26 Speaker 67: Transportation, and the town of the

00:10:27 Speaker 67: Blue Mountains. So this this project,

00:10:29 Speaker 67: we've got a couple intersections under

00:10:35 Speaker 67: this project, but the one that

00:10:36 Speaker 67: we'll focus on today is. the

00:10:37 Speaker 67: intersection of Highway 26 and Gray

00:10:40 Speaker 67: Road 2. So just to give

00:10:45 Speaker 67: an idea of where we are

00:10:47 Speaker 67: in the world here, we're about

00:10:50 Speaker 67: a kilometre east of Thornbury along

00:10:54 Speaker 69: Highway 26, and then you can

00:11:01 Speaker 67: see the Georgian Trail, kind of

00:11:03 Speaker 67: running along the north side of

00:11:07 Speaker 67: Highway 26 within our project limits

00:11:09 Speaker 67: here. So the scope of this

00:11:12 Speaker 67: project, we are going to be

00:11:16 Speaker 67: installing traffic signals at the intersection

00:11:19 Speaker 67: of Highway 26 and Gray Road

00:11:21 Speaker 67: 2. We'll also be realigning the

00:11:24 Speaker 67: the Georgian Trail. Currently, the Georgian

00:11:27 Speaker 67: Trail crosses east of the existing

00:11:29 Speaker 67: Highway 26 and and Gray Road

00:11:32 Speaker 67: 2 intersection at an unsignalized cross.

00:11:33 Speaker 67: At an unsignalized crossing, and for

00:11:34 Speaker 67: those of you who have been

00:11:37 Speaker 67: been biking or skiing along that

00:11:40 Speaker 67: trail, especially if you have young

00:11:42 Speaker 67: kids or anything like that, you

00:11:44 Speaker 67: probably know it's it's not a

00:11:46 Speaker 67: great location to cross the highway.

00:11:47 Speaker 67: It's in between two horizontal curves

00:11:49 Speaker 67: on the highway, so sight lines

00:11:53 Speaker 67: are a little bit restricted there.

00:11:55 Speaker 67: So, kind of the intent of

00:11:57 Speaker 67: this project is to to bring

00:12:01 Speaker 67: the Georgian Trail over to the

00:12:04 Speaker 67: intersection, cross at the signal. Cross

00:12:06 Speaker 67: at the signalized intersection where where

00:12:10 Speaker 67: traffic can be stopped and and

00:12:12 Speaker 67: users can safely cross the trail

00:12:14 Speaker 67: there. Another component of this project

00:12:17 Speaker 67: is is installing a new north

00:12:22 Speaker 67: leg to the intersection. So that's

00:12:24 Speaker 67: a road that travels up and

00:12:27 Speaker 67: connects with the the existing lakeshore

00:12:29 Speaker 69: road up there. It's mostly residential

00:12:37 Speaker 70: up there, a little couple bit

00:12:41 Speaker 70: small businesses. And then also just

00:12:43 Speaker 70: installing left turn lanes, just to

00:12:47 Speaker 70: support the traffic operations moving through

00:12:51 Speaker 70: the new signalized intersection. So just

00:12:53 Speaker 70: zooming in on the the proposed

00:12:57 Speaker 70: Georgian Trail realignment, as you can

00:12:58 Speaker 70: see, the existing Georgian Trail currently

00:13:01 Speaker 70: crossing east of the intersection. That

00:13:06 Speaker 70: crossing will be. decommissioned as part

00:13:09 Speaker 70: of the scope of work, and

00:13:12 Speaker 70: then the new trail will travel

00:13:15 Speaker 70: on the south side of Highway

00:13:17 Speaker 70: 26 over towards the the signalized

00:13:21 Speaker 60: intersection. It'll cross at the intersection,

00:13:30 Speaker 60: cross Highway 26, and then cross

00:13:32 Speaker 71: the proposed North Leg and Lakeshore

00:13:36 Speaker 71: Road, and then from there it'll

00:13:38 Speaker 70: tie into the the existing Jordan

00:13:41 Speaker 70: Trail, travelling west. Trail travelling westerly

00:13:43 Speaker 70: towards the town of Thornbury. So,

00:13:46 Speaker 70: a couple of the the old

00:13:48 Speaker 70: rigs that we looked at, just

00:13:51 Speaker 70: kind of keying in on the

00:13:52 Speaker 70: specific sections here. We did review

00:13:55 Speaker 70: sections eighty point six to eighty

00:13:58 Speaker 70: point fifteen for recreational trails, just

00:13:59 Speaker 70: with respect to the the Georgia

00:14:02 Speaker 70: Trail main. line, a couple of

00:14:03 Speaker 70: the highlights from the act. There

00:14:06 Speaker 70: we did look at the the

00:14:09 Speaker 70: minimum clear widths, the the grading

00:14:12 Speaker 70: of the trails. So that would

00:14:14 Speaker 70: be like your maximum cross slopes

00:14:17 Speaker 70: and your maximum running slopes, as

00:14:20 Speaker 70: stated in the act. And then

00:14:21 Speaker 70: we did look at the the

00:14:24 Speaker 70: gate opening requirements in the act

00:14:26 Speaker 70: as well. In terms of the

00:14:28 Speaker 70: Highway 26 crossing itself, we applied.

00:14:31 Speaker 70: the standards from the exterior passive

00:14:36 Speaker 70: travel sections of the act, so

00:14:37 Speaker 70: that's eighty point two one through

00:14:39 Speaker 70: eighty point three one, and some

00:14:44 Speaker 70: of the highlights from there. We're

00:14:47 Speaker 70: just looking at the the rest

00:14:55 Speaker 70: areas, the curb ramp requirements. So

00:14:58 Speaker 70: kind of from the sidewalk down

00:15:01 Speaker 70: to the actual asphalt surface where

00:15:04 Speaker 70: users will be crossing the the

00:15:06 Speaker 70: roads, and then the pedestrian control

00:15:09 Speaker 70: signals at each of the the

00:15:11 Speaker 70: crossing locations there. In terms of

00:15:15 Speaker 70: the the configuration of the proposed

00:15:17 Speaker 70: Georgian Trail, looking at our profile

00:15:19 Speaker 70: or the running slope, so that's

00:15:22 Speaker 70: kind of our steepness in the

00:15:24 Speaker 70: direction of travel. Generally, ranges from

00:15:26 Speaker 70: point five to two percent. Cross

00:15:28 Speaker 70: slopes are two percent. I believe

00:15:30 Speaker 70: we have one section that the

00:15:34 Speaker 70: cross slope is three percent, but

00:15:36 Speaker 70: generated around two percent. And then

00:15:42 Speaker 70: there is one section of the

00:15:45 Speaker 70: the trail that gets a little

00:15:49 Speaker 70: bit steeper. It's not quite five

00:15:51 Speaker 70: percent. It's like four point seven,

00:15:55 Speaker 70: four point eight, just as it's

00:16:00 Speaker 70: following the proposed Lake Shore North

00:16:01 Speaker 70: leg profile. And then. 4.5 metre

00:16:03 Speaker 70: clear width, so it gives users

00:16:06 Speaker 70: plenty of room for passing or

00:16:08 Speaker 70: crossing each other in opposing directions.

00:16:11 Speaker 70: And then there will be adjustable

00:16:13 Speaker 70: swing gates. These are the same

00:16:15 Speaker 70: gates that the Town of Blue

00:16:17 Speaker 70: Mountains uses on all of their

00:16:18 Speaker 70: other existing trail crossings. So it'll

00:16:21 Speaker 70: just be matching that same format

00:16:23 Speaker 70: and and. when they're fully closed,

00:16:25 Speaker 72: like they have a minimum opening

00:16:34 Speaker 70: of point nine metres, there they

00:16:37 Speaker 70: can be adjusted and opened up

00:16:39 Speaker 70: for like to get the trail

00:16:42 Speaker 70: groomers in there for maintaining the

00:16:45 Speaker 70: trails throughout the winter months. But

00:16:48 Speaker 70: generally, they're they're at a point

00:16:50 Speaker 70: nine metre opening there. In terms

00:16:54 Speaker 70: of the crossing there at the

00:16:56 Speaker 70: Highway Twenty Six intersection. At the

00:16:58 Speaker 70: Highway 26 intersection itself, there will

00:17:00 Speaker 70: be paved rest areas installed. So

00:17:04 Speaker 70: any users that cross Highway 26,

00:17:09 Speaker 70: waiting for the signals to change

00:17:13 Speaker 70: to cross to Lakeshore, they

00:17:15 Speaker 70: will have ample space, like a

00:17:20 Speaker 70: like a flat paved area for

00:17:23 Speaker 70: them to to rest on and

00:17:26 Speaker 70: and wait for those signals to

00:17:30 Speaker 70: change. We'll also be including concrete

00:17:34 Speaker 70: sidewalk ramps, as per. OPSD three

00:17:36 Speaker 70: ten point oh three zero,

00:17:40 Speaker 70: and then also including accessible pedestrian

00:17:42 Speaker 70: signals, as per OPSD two five

00:17:49 Speaker 70: five eight. The OPSDs; these are

00:17:51 Speaker 70: the Ontario Provincial Standard drawings. These

00:17:54 Speaker 70: are included on on majority of

00:17:57 Speaker 70: ministry projects. It's kind of their

00:18:00 Speaker 70: their standard standard items that they

00:18:04 Speaker 70: include at any. signalized intersections that

00:18:07 Speaker 70: we're anticipating, or that we have

00:18:10 Speaker 70: pedestrian infrastructure installed, and then just

00:18:13 Speaker 70: going through, we've got some tables

00:18:16 Speaker 70: here just showing the specific sections

00:18:18 Speaker 70: of the act and and the

00:18:22 Speaker 70: requirements therein that that we're meeting

00:18:24 Speaker 70: with our design here. So, looking

00:18:28 Speaker 70: at first the the Jordan Trail

00:18:30 Speaker 70: mainline, so that's the recreational trail

00:18:31 Speaker 70: sections of the act. There's minimum

00:18:34 Speaker 70: clear widths of one metre in

00:18:36 Speaker 70: the act. We're meeting that with

00:18:38 Speaker 70: a 4.5 metre clear width in

00:18:41 Speaker 70: the proposed design. Similarly with the

00:18:44 Speaker 70: trail gates, they do give some

00:18:46 Speaker 70: spacing requirements from 0.85 to one

00:18:48 Speaker 70: metres. We're kind of right in

00:18:54 Speaker 70: that range with the 0.9 metre

00:18:59 Speaker 70: gate opening. and then there is

00:19:03 Speaker 70: maximum cross slopes and running slopes

00:19:04 Speaker 70: that that we are within that

00:19:08 Speaker 70: tolerance. Generally, we're within 0.5 to

00:19:10 Speaker 70: 2% for our our running slopes

00:19:13 Speaker 70: and 2% for our cross slopes

00:19:15 Speaker 70: throughout the proposed trail design. And

00:19:20 Speaker 70: then for the actual Highway 26

00:19:22 Speaker 70: crossing itself, the Ontario standard drawings

00:19:24 Speaker 70: are. Standard drawings are—they meet the

00:19:27 Speaker 70: the minimum clear widths for the

00:19:29 Speaker 70: ramp requirements of 1.2 metres. Similarly,

00:19:31 Speaker 70: with the the maximum slopes for

00:19:36 Speaker 72: the ramps being 10% within the

00:19:46 Speaker 73: act, we're well within that range

00:19:48 Speaker 73: of 2 to 2.5%. And then

00:19:52 Speaker 73: there is some various height and

00:19:54 Speaker 73: spacing requirements for the the pedestrian

00:19:56 Speaker 73: signals, but the the standards that

00:19:58 Speaker 73: the ministry carries do meet all

00:20:00 Speaker 73: the requirements in the acts. and

00:20:02 Speaker 73: we are providing rest areas at

00:20:04 Speaker 74: the the intersection crossings there. So

00:20:09 Speaker 74: that's that's everything that I had

00:20:11 Speaker 74: to to present today, and definitely

00:20:23 Speaker 75: happy to receive any questions or

00:20:28 Speaker 75: or comments to to pass on

00:20:32 Speaker 76: to the to the design team

00:20:34 Speaker 76: if there's any additional requirements. we

00:20:35 Speaker 76: should we should be aware of,

00:20:37 Speaker 76: and happy to consider including them

00:20:39 Speaker 76: in our in our project here.

00:20:40 Speaker 76: Okay, thank you, Alex. Any of

00:20:42 Speaker 76: our members have any questions or

00:20:44 Speaker 76: comments for Alex? Anyone? Kathy. Thank

00:20:45 Speaker 76: you, Chair Schultz. Maybe can you

00:20:49 Speaker 76: take the the slide, Alex? Oh,

00:20:51 Speaker 75: yep. Okay. Sorry, I wasn't sure

00:20:54 Speaker 75: if it was only me that

00:20:57 Speaker 75: couldn't see anybody. Okay. Yeah. No,

00:21:02 Speaker 75: that's okay. I just want to

00:21:04 Speaker 75: say thanks very much for coming

00:21:06 Speaker 75: to present on this. This I

00:21:09 Speaker 75: think it was really well done.

00:21:12 Speaker 75: I really like the way that

00:21:14 Speaker 75: you referenced the legislation, and it

00:21:16 Speaker 75: looks like everything has been well

00:21:20 Speaker 77: considered, and I'm grateful for that.

00:21:23 Speaker 78: I also want to remind everybody

00:21:27 Speaker 78: that although it's just the voting

00:21:31 Speaker 79: committee members who are able to

00:21:33 Speaker 79: vote in a meeting, all of

00:21:35 Speaker 02: our municipal members are able to

00:21:37 Speaker 02: join in the conversation, and in

00:21:39 Speaker 02: fact, anybody else who's joining in

00:21:41 Speaker 02: the meeting has is welcome to

00:21:43 Speaker 80: share thoughts or questions. That's all

00:21:49 Speaker 80: I have. Thank you. Thank you,

00:21:50 Speaker 80: Kathy. Well put. Thanks, Kathy. Happy

00:21:53 Speaker 80: to happy to be here. And

00:21:55 Speaker 81: and I my I totally agree

00:21:57 Speaker 81: with what Kathy has said as

00:22:00 Speaker 81: well. It was well well done,

00:22:02 Speaker 81: well presented, and I thank you

00:22:05 Speaker 81: for that, Alex. And I believe

00:22:07 Speaker 81: that Pruthvi, you had your hand

00:22:09 Speaker 82: up. Yeah. Thanks, Catherine. And I

00:22:12 Speaker 83: just wanted to myself, Pruthvi. I'm

00:22:17 Speaker 84: a manager capital projects. at the

00:22:20 Speaker 84: Town of the Blue Mountains here.

00:22:22 Speaker 84: Just wanted to thank Alex and

00:22:30 Speaker 85: the team at EGIS and MTO

00:22:32 Speaker 85: for taking lead on this, and

00:22:35 Speaker 85: appreciate you guys coming up here

00:22:36 Speaker 86: and presenting on behalf of the

00:22:38 Speaker 86: town. That's very appreciable. Thank you,

00:22:40 Speaker 86: Alex. Thank you, Kathy. You're welcome.

00:22:42 Speaker 87: Thanks, Praty. And again, I'll ask

00:22:45 Speaker 87: if anybody has any comments, just

00:22:47 Speaker 88: in case. we miss anyone. Oh,

00:22:49 Speaker 89: yes, Scott. Scott, did you have

00:22:51 Speaker 89: there? There we go. Okay, good.

00:22:54 Speaker 90: Thank you very much, Alex. Just

00:22:56 Speaker 90: a couple questions, really, to orientate

00:22:59 Speaker 90: me, and I, you'd certainly help

00:23:02 Speaker 91: me with the one comment. But

00:23:05 Speaker 91: as I blow up the schematics

00:23:06 Speaker 92: here, if I could just ask

00:23:11 Speaker 92: you just for a little more

00:23:13 Speaker 92: clarity, if I'm going eastbound. on

00:23:15 Speaker 92: Highway 26, I believe I see

00:23:16 Speaker 93: a straight through, a right turn,

00:23:19 Speaker 93: and there's a green area. Is

00:23:21 Speaker 94: that a dedicated left lane? There's

00:23:24 Speaker 94: also a similar green area on

00:23:26 Speaker 95: County Road 2, but I can't

00:23:28 Speaker 95: make out if it's a dedicated

00:23:31 Speaker 95: left. Um, and westbound, I think

00:23:32 Speaker 96: I see a straight through and

00:23:35 Speaker 96: a right turn. So my first

00:23:38 Speaker 96: question is, if you could just.

00:23:41 Speaker 96: explain that a little more for

00:23:42 Speaker 96: me, and I've got a little

00:23:45 Speaker 96: feedback. Sorry, but part two is

00:23:48 Speaker 96: I did have a question about

00:23:49 Speaker 97: the running slope at five percent

00:23:53 Speaker 97: and where that was located. But

00:23:54 Speaker 67: I think you answered that in

00:23:57 Speaker 67: stating that it's a part of

00:23:59 Speaker 67: the existing trail as it's already

00:24:04 Speaker 67: on Lakeshore. So that was the

00:24:07 Speaker 67: other question. If you could just

00:24:10 Speaker 67: confirm that it's on the

00:24:12 Speaker 67: existing portion. as I see it

00:24:15 Speaker 67: on the map, and not the

00:24:16 Speaker 67: new. Thanks. Yes. So, for the

00:24:21 Speaker 67: in terms of the the kind

00:24:24 Speaker 67: of green hatched areas, yeah, you

00:24:30 Speaker 67: are correct. Those are are dedicated

00:24:33 Speaker 67: left turning lanes. I guess to

00:24:35 Speaker 67: be more specific, those are proposed

00:24:38 Speaker 67: dedicated left turning lanes. So, in

00:24:44 Speaker 67: the eastbound direction, coming towards the

00:24:46 Speaker 67: intersection along Highway 26. Twenty-six. There

00:24:48 Speaker 67: will be a new left turning

00:24:51 Speaker 67: lane travelling north onto the new

00:24:55 Speaker 67: Lakeshore Road connection that will be

00:24:57 Speaker 67: installed. And then, similarly, along Gray

00:25:03 Speaker 67: Road two coming northbound, there will

00:25:04 Speaker 67: be a new dedicated left turning

00:25:06 Speaker 98: lane installed. If you want to

00:25:09 Speaker 98: travel west towards Thurinbury, and then.

00:25:11 Speaker 98: in the westbound direction on Highway

00:25:13 Speaker 98: 26, there is already a left

00:25:14 Speaker 98: turn lane there, so that will

00:25:15 Speaker 98: just be maintained and resurfaced through

00:25:17 Speaker 99: this this project with new asphalt

00:25:20 Speaker 100: and pavement markings. I guess before

00:25:23 Speaker 100: I move on to the second

00:25:25 Speaker 101: part of the question, does that

00:25:29 Speaker 101: does that kind of help with

00:25:32 Speaker 101: with the first question there? I

00:25:37 Speaker 101: think it does. I'm just—I wanted

00:25:38 Speaker 101: to be certain. I was looking

00:25:41 Speaker 102: at when I think of more

00:25:46 Speaker 103: rural cross sections with lights and

00:25:49 Speaker 104: people crossing. We're often dealing with

00:25:52 Speaker 104: higher speeds, so I just want

00:25:55 Speaker 70: to be certain that the the

00:25:57 Speaker 70: proper protection mechanisms are in place

00:25:59 Speaker 70: to protect pedestrians against cars speeding

00:26:02 Speaker 70: into left-hand turns or just those

00:26:04 Speaker 70: quick turning movements that can happen

00:26:06 Speaker 70: at higher speeds than than. maybe

00:26:09 Speaker 70: in urban centres. Yeah, there will

00:26:10 Speaker 70: be the the dedicated left turning

00:26:14 Speaker 70: lanes there, and then there is

00:26:15 Speaker 70: kind of the standard concrete barrier

00:26:17 Speaker 70: curb will be installed throughout the

00:26:20 Speaker 70: intersections, and then we will have

00:26:28 Speaker 70: kind of those rest areas so

00:26:29 Speaker 101: that users that are that are

00:26:33 Speaker 101: accessing the trail they will be

00:26:34 Speaker 101: able to kind of offset themselves

00:26:38 Speaker 67: further away. from the traffic than

00:26:40 Speaker 67: maybe in an urban scenario, so

00:26:44 Speaker 67: they're not kind of jammed right

00:26:47 Speaker 67: up against the the live lanes

00:26:50 Speaker 67: of traffic there. That's kind of

00:26:53 Speaker 67: another another feature of the the

00:26:57 Speaker 67: paved rest areas. And and the

00:27:00 Speaker 67: second part was just confirming that

00:27:03 Speaker 67: the the running slope of five

00:27:06 Speaker 67: percent was on an existing portion

00:27:07 Speaker 67: of the lakeshore. The Lake

00:27:09 Speaker 67: Shore Trail part. So it is

00:27:13 Speaker 67: actually part of the proposed proposed

00:27:18 Speaker 67: trail, and it's a portion of

00:27:20 Speaker 67: the trail. Kind of as it

00:27:21 Speaker 67: travels north along the proposed Lake

00:27:23 Speaker 67: Shore North Lake, it is matching

00:27:26 Speaker 67: the alignment of the the proposed.

00:27:28 Speaker 67: Or sorry, I guess matching the

00:27:30 Speaker 67: the profile of the proposed North

00:27:32 Speaker 67: Lake. there is quite a bit

00:27:33 Speaker 67: of a grade difference between the

00:27:36 Speaker 67: existing intersection platform and the existing

00:27:39 Speaker 67: Lakeshore Road that we'd be tying

00:27:42 Speaker 67: into. So that's where that kind

00:27:43 Speaker 67: of five percent comes up to.

00:27:45 Speaker 67: I think it's it's a small

00:27:49 Speaker 67: portion. I think it's thirty metres,

00:27:51 Speaker 67: and it varies. But the maximum

00:27:55 Speaker 67: slope at the steepest point along

00:27:56 Speaker 67: that thirty metre section is like

00:28:11 Speaker 105: four point seven or four point

00:28:18 Speaker 106: eight percent. 0.8 percent, and the

00:28:21 Speaker 106: reasoning for that is just because

00:28:23 Speaker 107: the the two platforms are kind

00:28:25 Speaker 107: of matching each other. So the

00:28:29 Speaker 108: the roadway and the trail are

00:28:34 Speaker 108: there's a barrier curb in between

00:28:35 Speaker 109: them, but just in terms of

00:28:37 Speaker 109: constructability, they will have like the

00:28:45 Speaker 02: same road base on them. So

00:28:50 Speaker 110: it's it's going to have similar

00:28:53 Speaker 110: grading across that section there.

00:29:11 Speaker 110: Okay.

00:29:14 Speaker 111: Anyone else have any comments? No,

00:29:18 Speaker 111: I don't see. Okay. Thank you,

00:29:20 Speaker 101: Alex and Prathy, for your presentation

00:29:24 Speaker 101: today. We greatly appreciate it, and

00:29:27 Speaker 101: good luck with the project. Thanks.

00:29:29 Speaker 101: You're welcome. Okay, we'll move on

00:29:31 Speaker 101: to the next item on the

00:29:33 Speaker 101: agenda, that is item number four

00:29:35 Speaker 101: C. CCR-JAAC-19-25 Municipal Accessibility Legislation, Gray

00:29:36 Speaker 101: County, and I'm going to hand

00:29:38 Speaker 101: this over to Cappy. Thank you,

00:29:40 Speaker 101: Cappy. Oh, sorry, Scott. Did you

00:29:42 Speaker 101: have your hand up? Well, I

00:29:43 Speaker 112: was just thinking this one doesn't

00:29:46 Speaker 112: seem to have the commenting. Like

00:29:48 Speaker 113: this had an actual motion for

00:29:51 Speaker 75: receipt. and I was just thinking

00:29:55 Speaker 75: that I was going to just

00:29:58 Speaker 75: make a motion to postpone this

00:30:00 Speaker 75: report to the next meeting. But

00:30:02 Speaker 75: then I then I thought, well,

00:30:05 Speaker 75: I can't make a motion to

00:30:08 Speaker 75: postpone anyway. We don't have quorum,

00:30:11 Speaker 75: so that's why the hand was

00:30:16 Speaker 75: up, and then the hand was

00:30:18 Speaker 75: down. Okay, I didn't see the

00:30:22 Speaker 75: hand go down, so I apologize

00:30:23 Speaker 75: for that. So through you, Chair

00:30:24 Speaker 75: Schultz, I think while there is

00:30:30 Speaker 75: a motion, it's it's to accept

00:30:32 Speaker 75: the report and that it's for

00:30:33 Speaker 114: information and that it's to share

00:30:36 Speaker 114: the information with the committee. So

00:30:38 Speaker 114: I don't think there's any decision

00:30:43 Speaker 114: making involved here. And if if

00:30:45 Speaker 115: it would be amenable to the

00:30:50 Speaker 115: committee to everybody to carry on

00:30:52 Speaker 115: and just present this, or if

00:30:54 Speaker 75: it's desired to move it to

00:30:57 Speaker 75: the next meeting, I'm happy to

00:31:00 Speaker 75: do that as well. Yeah, I

00:31:02 Speaker 75: am. I'm completely fine with that,

00:31:06 Speaker 75: Kathy. With you going ahead with

00:31:08 Speaker 75: it today, as long as everyone

00:31:09 Speaker 75: else feels the same way. Is

00:31:11 Speaker 75: there anyone that would object to

00:31:13 Speaker 75: this? Any members that would object

00:31:15 Speaker 75: to Kathy proceeding with this item?

00:31:17 Speaker 75: I don't see. Okay. So I

00:31:20 Speaker 75: would proceed, Kathy. Thank you. Okay.

00:31:21 Speaker 75: Thank you. Chair Schultz. Can everybody

00:31:23 Speaker 75: see the presentation? Okay, super. And

00:31:28 Speaker 75: with your blessing and permission,

00:31:33 Speaker 75: Chair Schultz, because this is a

00:31:36 Speaker 75: fairly meaty presentation, and because I

00:31:38 Speaker 75: know that if somebody has

00:31:41 Speaker 75: a question or a thought, it's

00:31:45 Speaker 75: an important question or thought. So

00:31:48 Speaker 75: instead of waiting to the end

00:31:51 Speaker 75: and perhaps losing that train of

00:31:54 Speaker 75: thought, please feel free to interrupt

00:31:56 Speaker 75: me and ask a question along

00:31:57 Speaker 75: the way or provide a comment

00:32:00 Speaker 75: along the way. if you so

00:32:03 Speaker 75: desire. So there's many areas of

00:32:06 Speaker 75: legislatively affecting locally, provincially, and federally.

00:32:12 Speaker 75: It's difficult to be aware of

00:32:14 Speaker 75: all the obligations, and there's compliance

00:32:17 Speaker 75: regulations for small businesses, large businesses,

00:32:20 Speaker 75: public sector organisations, and municipalities fall

00:32:21 Speaker 75: under the public sector organisations, and

00:32:23 Speaker 75: every. other person or organisation that

00:32:26 Speaker 75: provides goods or services to the

00:32:29 Speaker 75: public. So, I mean, there's a

00:32:30 Speaker 75: lot of things that we all

00:32:32 Speaker 75: have responsibilities for, and it's pretty

00:32:36 Speaker 75: challenging to tease out what it

00:32:38 Speaker 75: is that is required from

00:32:41 Speaker 75: a municipal perspective. Where, where,

00:32:47 Speaker 75: I know, oftentimes we get asked

00:32:48 Speaker 75: questions that fall outside of our

00:32:52 Speaker 75: jurisdiction, and those are. challenging. We're

00:32:53 Speaker 75: not going to talk about those

00:32:58 Speaker 75: today. We're just going to talk

00:32:59 Speaker 75: about what what is required from

00:33:02 Speaker 75: a municipal standpoint. And the reason

00:33:05 Speaker 75: why I've put this together now

00:33:08 Speaker 75: is because recently I was asked

00:33:12 Speaker 75: to present to a municipality

00:33:15 Speaker 75: on the benefits of belonging to

00:33:22 Speaker 75: a joint accessibility advisory committee, specifically

00:33:26 Speaker 75: with what municipal participation looks like.

00:33:29 Speaker 75: and what pieces of the legislation

00:33:30 Speaker 75: can be supported through being a

00:33:33 Speaker 75: member of the committee. So, attached

00:33:36 Speaker 75: to the report is a very

00:33:39 Speaker 75: fulsome chart with all of the

00:33:42 Speaker 75: legislation on it, and this particular

00:33:44 Speaker 75: PowerPoint is just going to address

00:33:46 Speaker 75: that piece that that can be

00:33:51 Speaker 75: assisted by being a municipal accessibility

00:33:54 Speaker 75: advisory committee member. so the butter

00:33:57 Speaker 75: yellow pieces of the report that

00:34:00 Speaker 75: those are the ones where legislation

00:34:02 Speaker 75: can be fulfiled through being a

00:34:07 Speaker 75: member of the AAC. The light

00:34:10 Speaker 75: gray ones are, in fact, pun

00:34:13 Speaker 75: intended, a gray area where consultation

00:34:16 Speaker 75: with the AAC isn't legislated, but

00:34:21 Speaker 75: it's best practice, and the white

00:34:24 Speaker 75: areas of the larger. report

00:34:26 Speaker 75: aren't addressed at all in this

00:34:30 Speaker 75: presentation. So the first piece of

00:34:33 Speaker 75: the legislation is to establish and

00:34:35 Speaker 75: continue an accessibility advisory committee. So

00:34:38 Speaker 75: yes, this is fulfiled by being

00:34:42 Speaker 75: a member of the GCJAAC. Municipalities

00:34:49 Speaker 75: with a population over ten thousand

00:34:53 Speaker 75: are required to have an

00:34:56 Speaker 75: accessibility advisory committee or to. participate

00:34:59 Speaker 75: in a joint accessibility advisory committee.

00:35:01 Speaker 75: The role of the committee is

00:35:04 Speaker 75: to advise council about the requirements

00:35:06 Speaker 75: and implementation of accessibility standards,

00:35:09 Speaker 75: and advise about the preparation of

00:35:12 Speaker 75: accessibility reports and any other matter

00:35:16 Speaker 75: that the council may ask for

00:35:18 Speaker 75: help with relating to the accessibility

00:35:22 Speaker 75: legislation. So, yes. joint AAC participation

00:35:25 Speaker 75: helps to meet that requirement. The

00:35:27 Speaker 75: next one is completion and submission

00:35:37 Speaker 75: of accessibility compliance reports. 2025 is

00:35:39 Speaker 75: a compliance reporting year for municipalities,

00:35:42 Speaker 75: so we will have to be

00:35:45 Speaker 75: doing this. And while it isn't

00:35:48 Speaker 75: legislated, the Ministry for Seniors and

00:35:51 Speaker 75: Accessibility encourages consultation with the AAC.

00:35:57 Speaker 75: So, where possible, the presentation of

00:35:59 Speaker 75: the compliance reports to the committee

00:36:03 Speaker 75: will help just with involvement. Nothing

00:36:06 Speaker 75: about us without us, and help

00:36:10 Speaker 116: with transparency and accountability. It is

00:36:15 Speaker 116: it's not legislated, but it's best

00:36:16 Speaker 75: practice. Council shall seek advice from

00:36:18 Speaker 75: the committee. when purchasing or significantly

00:36:20 Speaker 75: renovating a building, structure, or premises,

00:36:24 Speaker 75: or part of a building, structure,

00:36:26 Speaker 75: or premises. This is for the

00:36:29 Speaker 75: publicly owned buildings, and municipal staff

00:36:31 Speaker 75: would then do a report to

00:36:33 Speaker 75: committee to seek committee's advice on

00:36:34 Speaker 75: the accessibility component. And so, yes,

00:36:39 Speaker 75: this is another requirement. that is

00:36:42 Speaker 75: facilitated by being a member. How

00:36:44 Speaker 75: how am I doing so far?

00:36:47 Speaker 75: Have I have I lost anybody

00:36:49 Speaker 75: yet? I know it's heavy stuff.

00:36:51 Speaker 75: So sorry about that, everybody. The

00:36:54 Speaker 75: council shall seek advice from the

00:37:01 Speaker 75: committee on the accessibility for persons

00:37:03 Speaker 75: with disabilities to a building structure

00:37:07 Speaker 75: or premise, or part of a

00:37:09 Speaker 75: building structure or premises when entering

00:37:13 Speaker 75: into a new lease. To a

00:37:16 Speaker 75: new lease, so this is if

00:37:21 Speaker 75: the municipality owns the property and

00:37:24 Speaker 75: is leasing it to a third

00:37:26 Speaker 75: party, or if the municipality is

00:37:31 Speaker 75: leasing from a third party. So

00:37:34 Speaker 75: this is another one. Yes, it

00:37:37 Speaker 75: would be met by presenting to

00:37:40 Speaker 75: the AAC, develop, implement, and maintain

00:37:43 Speaker 75: policies governing provision of goods, services,

00:37:49 Speaker 75: or. facilities, this is not legislated,

00:37:51 Speaker 75: but it's best practice to involve

00:37:55 Speaker 75: your AAC in reviewing policies where

00:37:59 Speaker 75: they pertain to persons with disabilities.

00:38:04 Speaker 75: Then we get into the Planning

00:38:08 Speaker 75: Act. There's a pretty substantial piece

00:38:11 Speaker 75: in the report that outlines the

00:38:18 Speaker 75: exact requirements from the Planning Act.

00:38:22 Speaker 75: but basically the overview is: it

00:38:25 Speaker 75: says municipalities have the ability to

00:38:27 Speaker 75: say when they want the accessibility

00:38:30 Speaker 75: advisory committee's input. And in 2019,

00:38:31 Speaker 75: Council, Gray County Council, endorsed a

00:38:32 Speaker 75: resolution from this committee that the

00:38:34 Speaker 75: site plan applications connected to newly

00:38:37 Speaker 75: developed or redeveloped public spaces. municipal

00:38:40 Speaker 75: offices, community centres, rec centres, and

00:38:44 Speaker 75: sports facilities need to come to

00:38:49 Speaker 75: the AAC for review and comment.

00:38:51 Speaker 75: We're required to keep a multi-year

00:38:59 Speaker 75: accessibility plan that outlines strategies to

00:39:01 Speaker 75: prevent and remove barriers. We need

00:39:03 Speaker 75: to post the plan on the

00:39:08 Speaker 75: website. we need to review it

00:39:11 Speaker 75: and update it at least once

00:39:13 Speaker 75: every five years, and we need

00:39:17 Speaker 75: to prepare and publicly post an

00:39:19 Speaker 75: annual accessibility status report on the

00:39:22 Speaker 75: progress of the plan. So, the

00:39:26 Speaker 75: municipalities will present to the committee

00:39:29 Speaker 75: for review and comment, and that

00:39:32 Speaker 75: will meet that obligation in 2023.

00:39:35 Speaker 75: and they haven't done any follow-up

00:39:37 Speaker 75: since then. The Ministry of Tourism,

00:39:38 Speaker 75: Culture, and Sport requested municipally owned

00:39:40 Speaker 75: museum applicants to submit a copy

00:39:44 Speaker 75: of their current accessibility plan along

00:39:46 Speaker 75: with their applications. So this did

00:39:48 Speaker 75: happen, and Jill from Gray Roots

00:39:56 Speaker 75: presented to this committee in

00:40:01 Speaker 75: 2023, and we adopted, which was

00:40:07 Speaker 75: endorsed by council. Following that, the

00:40:09 Speaker 75: museum's multi-year accessibility plan, which is

00:40:17 Speaker 75: now part of the Gray County

00:40:19 Speaker 75: multi-year accessibility plan, we don't know

00:40:25 Speaker 75: if this is going to come

00:40:30 Speaker 75: up again, or and they haven't

00:40:31 Speaker 75: spoken about reporting on progress. But

00:40:39 Speaker 75: I think we can just capture

00:40:40 Speaker 75: it through the Gray County multi-year

00:40:44 Speaker 75: accessibility plan. Municipalities. must consult with

00:40:47 Speaker 75: the with their accessibility advisory committees

00:40:48 Speaker 75: about acquiring, designing self-service kiosks, and

00:40:52 Speaker 75: when constructing new service counters or

00:40:53 Speaker 75: replacing existing service counters, and before

00:40:55 Speaker 75: building or making major changes

00:40:59 Speaker 75: to existing recreational trails. The committee

00:41:02 Speaker 75: can help to determine the amenities

00:41:04 Speaker 75: that are needed on the trail

00:41:10 Speaker 75: for accessibility, also outdoor play spaces

00:41:14 Speaker 75: and the design and placement of

00:41:18 Speaker 75: rest areas. When making changes to,

00:41:25 Speaker 75: it's in the legislation as exterior

00:41:29 Speaker 75: paths of travel, but what they're

00:41:31 Speaker 75: saying is sidewalks. It's been. really

00:41:37 Speaker 75: good to see that we've got

00:41:41 Speaker 75: lots of participation from local municipalities,

00:41:43 Speaker 75: bringing these reports to committee for

00:41:44 Speaker 75: review and comment, and the good

00:41:48 Speaker 75: input that they receive from this

00:41:51 Speaker 75: committee is well received. When constructing

00:41:52 Speaker 75: new or redeveloping existing outdoor play

00:41:59 Speaker 75: spaces, so again, playgrounds and

00:42:02 Speaker 75: stuff like that. Conventional transportation,

00:42:06 Speaker 75: bus shelters, and bus stops need

00:42:10 Speaker 75: need to be considered by the

00:42:11 Speaker 75: committees. And if if an an

00:42:14 Speaker 75: external party is providing the building

00:42:16 Speaker 75: of the bus shelter, they need

00:42:22 Speaker 75: to come and present to the

00:42:25 Speaker 75: committee beforehand so that the committee

00:42:30 Speaker 75: can provide the. committee can provide

00:42:33 Speaker 75: their their input on what would

00:42:36 Speaker 75: help to meet the needs of

00:42:38 Speaker 75: accessibility. Every municipality shall

00:42:41 Speaker 75: consult with its municipality municipal

00:42:43 Speaker 75: accessibility advisory committee in determining the

00:42:46 Speaker 75: proportion of on-demand accessible taxicabs. So,

00:42:48 Speaker 75: not a lot of our local

00:42:55 Speaker 75: municipalities do licensing of taxicabs, but

00:43:02 Speaker 117: these need to come to the

00:43:06 Speaker 117: AA. The AAC, and then this

00:43:08 Speaker 117: last slide is just a link

00:43:14 Speaker 117: to the province's suggestion. It says,

00:43:15 Speaker 117: "Consult the committee. We encourage you

00:43:17 Speaker 118: to consult with your accessibility advisory

00:43:19 Speaker 118: committee about how to implement the

00:43:21 Speaker 118: province's accessibility standards, the preparation of

00:43:22 Speaker 118: your municipality's accessibility compliance reports, and

00:43:24 Speaker 119: any other matters." where the committee's

00:43:27 Speaker 119: advice would be helpful. You made

00:43:28 Speaker 119: it through, everybody! Yay! That was

00:43:30 Speaker 119: great, Kathy. Thank you. Does anyone

00:43:34 Speaker 119: have any questions or comments for

00:43:36 Speaker 119: Kathy? I see Margaret's got her

00:43:37 Speaker 119: hand up. Hi, hi, everybody. I

00:43:40 Speaker 119: hope you can hear me. This

00:43:41 Speaker 119: is my name's Margaret Nicholson, and

00:43:43 Speaker 119: I asked Kathy if I could

00:43:45 Speaker 120: sit in today. I'm from the

00:43:51 Speaker 121: city of St. Catharines, and I've

00:43:54 Speaker 121: been in this position six months.

00:43:56 Speaker 121: So you can imagine I'm doing

00:43:58 Speaker 121: a lot of catch up, and

00:43:59 Speaker 122: I just really appreciated Kathy how

00:44:04 Speaker 117: succinct that presentation was and clear.

00:44:06 Speaker 117: And I just want to say

00:44:14 Speaker 123: I'm learning a lot just watching

00:44:16 Speaker 123: your AAC meetings. Thank you so

00:44:18 Speaker 124: much for just letting me sit

00:44:20 Speaker 117: in and listen. Really great. good

00:44:23 Speaker 125: stuff. Good on you, Gregg County.

00:44:27 Speaker 02: Well, thank you, Margaret, and congratulations

00:44:29 Speaker 02: on your new position. Thank you.

00:44:32 Speaker 126: And we were happy to have

00:44:36 Speaker 127: you today. Oh well, thanks very

00:44:39 Speaker 127: much. It was it was really

00:44:41 Speaker 127: great. Thanks. You're welcome. Does anyone

00:44:44 Speaker 127: else have any questions for Kathy

00:44:47 Speaker 127: or comments? No. Okay. Well done,

00:44:48 Speaker 127: Kathy. Thank you. Thank you. We'll

00:44:53 Speaker 127: move on to the next item,

00:44:55 Speaker 127: which is an item number four

4.d West Grey Front Counter Renovations (Michele Harris)

Michelle Harris presented a report on West Grey Front Counter Renovations to address security vulnerabilities following a gun threat at the municipality's office. The proposal involves installing keypads on staff access doors to restrict entry while maintaining accessibility features and reconfiguring the accessible counter height and location for better privacy. Glass barriers with restricted access capabilities are also proposed to enhance staff comfort and safety.

00:44:58 Speaker 127: D, West Gray Front Counter Renovations,

00:44:59 Speaker 127: and I will hand this over

00:45:02 Speaker 127: for presentation to Michelle Harris, the

00:45:04 Speaker 127: CAO of the Municipality of West

00:45:07 Speaker 127: Gray. Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you

00:45:10 Speaker 127: for having me. I am delighted.

00:45:13 Speaker 127: to be able to present this

00:45:15 Speaker 127: report to you for your review.

00:45:18 Speaker 127: It's unfortunate that we've had to

00:45:20 Speaker 127: bring it. We recently had a

00:45:23 Speaker 127: fairly hostile, aggressive member of the

00:45:24 Speaker 127: public come into our office, and

00:45:27 Speaker 127: there's some timeliness. As you can

00:45:30 Speaker 127: understand, our staff are fairly nervous

00:45:31 Speaker 127: now. There was a gun threat

00:45:34 Speaker 127: that was posed at the time—not

00:45:36 Speaker 127: an actual gun, but a gun

00:45:38 Speaker 127: threat—and. Threat and so we we've

00:45:41 Speaker 127: it forced us sometimes bad circumstances

00:45:43 Speaker 127: force you to look at potential

00:45:46 Speaker 127: vulnerabilities and we realize well I

00:45:48 Speaker 127: don't have photos included there is

00:45:53 Speaker 127: a drawing included with our package

00:45:55 Speaker 127: and when you walk into our

00:45:57 Speaker 127: front lobby of the municipality the

00:46:01 Speaker 127: entire front area is open to

00:46:04 Speaker 127: the public we have our regular

00:46:05 Speaker 127: counters there are no barriers on

00:46:08 Speaker 127: both the left and right side

00:46:10 Speaker 127: of the count. Side of the

00:46:14 Speaker 127: counter entrance, we have doors into

00:46:15 Speaker 127: the back administrative area, which are

00:46:17 Speaker 127: not locked. They do have signs

00:46:19 Speaker 127: that say "restricted access," but there's

00:46:21 Speaker 127: no restriction there. So, what we

00:46:25 Speaker 127: are proposing is putting keypads on

00:46:28 Speaker 127: the doors to the left and

00:46:31 Speaker 127: right of the entrance. Both those

00:46:34 Speaker 127: staff access areas have accessibility pads,

00:46:35 Speaker 127: so the doors automatically open with

00:46:39 Speaker 127: the push of a button. and

00:46:40 Speaker 127: with the installation of the keypad

00:46:43 Speaker 127: restricted access, we would still maintain

00:46:46 Speaker 127: those accessible accesses. Nothing would change,

00:46:48 Speaker 127: other than there would be a

00:46:49 Speaker 127: restricted code, and the keypad would

00:46:52 Speaker 127: be accessible for any staff member

00:46:54 Speaker 127: that is required for it. Additionally,

00:46:58 Speaker 127: on the drawing, our current accessible

00:47:01 Speaker 127: height counter is on the right

00:47:04 Speaker 127: side of the counter. We are

00:47:06 Speaker 127: proposing making that the same. height

00:47:10 Speaker 127: as the rest of the counter,

00:47:13 Speaker 127: and moving the accessibility side over

00:47:14 Speaker 127: to the left. So we'll be

00:47:19 Speaker 127: lowering the counter over to the

00:47:21 Speaker 127: left, which provides more private access

00:47:22 Speaker 127: for people who need it. Because

00:47:23 Speaker 127: right now the accessible counter is

00:47:25 Speaker 127: almost at the doorway, so there's

00:47:27 Speaker 127: no sort of separate area to

00:47:28 Speaker 127: conduct business. All of the areas

00:47:29 Speaker 127: that we are proposing reconfiguration to

00:47:32 Speaker 127: will. Configuration too will have glass

00:47:39 Speaker 127: barriers that can open and close

00:47:41 Speaker 128: and provide restricted access if indeed

00:47:44 Speaker 129: we need to. But we believe

00:47:46 Speaker 129: it will make our staff feel

00:47:47 Speaker 130: more comfortable and just provide that

00:47:50 Speaker 130: barrier which we currently don't have.

00:47:52 Speaker 131: And that's really the sum of

00:47:55 Speaker 131: it. I wish I didn't have

00:47:57 Speaker 131: to do this. It's the state

00:48:00 Speaker 131: of our world right now. That

00:48:01 Speaker 02: you always like to think that

00:48:03 Speaker 02: you don't need to do worry

00:48:05 Speaker 02: about these things, but sadly. there

00:48:09 Speaker 02: we are. So, thank you, Michelle,

00:48:13 Speaker 02: for bringing that. And yes, it

00:48:15 Speaker 02: is very sad that you have

00:48:16 Speaker 02: to make these changes as a

00:48:25 Speaker 02: direct result of that threat. And

00:48:27 Speaker 132: I'm sorry to hear that. But

00:48:29 Speaker 132: you are doing the right thing,

00:48:31 Speaker 132: and you're putting in place protective

00:48:32 Speaker 133: measures, not only for your staff

00:48:35 Speaker 133: but for the general public as

00:48:36 Speaker 133: well. yeah, you know, coming into

00:48:37 Speaker 133: the building. So I commend you

00:48:39 Speaker 133: for taking this as seriously as

00:48:42 Speaker 133: you have. Thank you. Does anyone

00:48:43 Speaker 134: have any comments or questions for

00:48:46 Speaker 134: Michelle, based on what she's presented

00:48:52 Speaker 02: and what you've received in your

00:48:55 Speaker 02: agenda package? No. No. Okay. Well,

00:48:59 Speaker 02: thank you, Michelle. Thank you so

00:49:02 Speaker 02: much, Chair Schultz, and the committee.

00:49:04 Speaker 02: and Kathy, thank you for your

00:49:09 Speaker 02: report. It was very informative, and

00:49:11 Speaker 02: I look forward to the fulsome

00:49:15 Speaker 02: ness of it at some point

00:49:17 Speaker 02: as well, and giving it a

00:49:20 Speaker 02: full review. But it was very

00:49:22 Speaker 02: helpful from a lower tier municipality

00:49:24 Speaker 135: perspective. Just a reminder of what

00:49:27 Speaker 135: our requirements are. So, thank you.

00:49:30 Speaker 135: My pleasure. Okay. So, it looks

00:49:34 Speaker 135: like the last item on the

00:49:35 Speaker 135: agenda is course. Is correspondence, and

00:49:37 Speaker 135: that's item number five, and five

5.a City of Owen Sound Site Plan Approvals (Sabine Robart)

The City of Owen Sound site plan approvals were presented to the committee by Pam, noting that Sabine Robart, manager of planning and heritage, was unable to attend the meeting. The presentation covered accessibility matters for various developments including a new storage building at the public works site, TD Bank, residential projects, and a U-Haul building. No questions or comments were raised regarding the items.

00:49:39 Speaker 135: a is the city of Owen

00:49:42 Speaker 135: Sound site plan approvals, and I

00:49:43 Speaker 135: will. There's a number of site

00:49:44 Speaker 135: plan approvals on the list for

00:49:45 Speaker 136: correspondence. I will hand this over

00:49:50 Speaker 137: to Sabine, manager of planning and

00:49:54 Speaker 138: heritage, for the city of Owen

00:49:57 Speaker 138: Sound. Um, Chair Soltz, if I

00:49:59 Speaker 139: could, through you, um. Through you,

00:50:02 Speaker 140: Sabine is not with us at

00:50:05 Speaker 140: the meeting. I think she just

00:50:06 Speaker 141: wanted to have feedback, or sorry,

00:50:09 Speaker 142: not feedback. I think she just

00:50:13 Speaker 142: wanted to present the site plan

00:50:15 Speaker 142: approvals to the committee as correspondence,

00:50:17 Speaker 143: but she's not able to join

00:50:20 Speaker 144: us. So I think what we'll

00:50:22 Speaker 144: do is we'll just move that

00:50:24 Speaker 144: item to the next meeting. Okay,

00:50:26 Speaker 144: absolutely. Oh, Pam is here. Good

00:50:28 Speaker 144: afternoon, everyone. You know. In on

00:50:30 Speaker 144: sound are the matters of accessibility

00:50:32 Speaker 144: relating to site plans are plans

00:50:35 Speaker 144: are dealt with through a checklist

00:50:38 Speaker 144: because site plan approval is delegated

00:50:41 Speaker 145: to staff and it has a

00:50:43 Speaker 145: very short window for approval. The

00:50:47 Speaker 145: accessibility, the matters of accessibility that

00:50:49 Speaker 145: were relevant to the consideration and

00:50:50 Speaker 145: approval of each of these site

00:50:53 Speaker 145: plans was attached. I would note

00:50:54 Speaker 145: that you'll see on here. the

00:50:57 Speaker 145: own Saint Mary McDonald building, so

00:50:59 Speaker 145: it's a new storage building at

00:51:06 Speaker 62: our public works site. And we

00:51:10 Speaker 62: always tell developers we treat ourselves

00:51:17 Speaker 62: just like we treat you, so

00:51:19 Speaker 62: the rules apply equally to us.

00:51:21 Speaker 02: But there's a variety of different

00:51:24 Speaker 02: developments on there, from the TD

00:51:27 Speaker 02: Bank to some residential to a

00:51:30 Speaker 02: large new U-Haul building. So the

00:51:32 Speaker 02: information and site plans are there.

00:51:34 Speaker 02: I'm happy to take any questions.

00:51:41 Speaker 146: if the committee has them, and

00:51:48 Speaker 146: I would go back and say

00:51:49 Speaker 146: on the Georgian Bluffs playgrounds, I'm

00:51:50 Speaker 146: really envious of both those designs.

00:51:52 Speaker 146: Well done! So, thank you, Pam.

00:51:55 Speaker 02: Does anyone have any questions or

00:51:59 Speaker 02: comments for Pam? I certainly looked

00:52:01 Speaker 147: at all the site plans. and

00:52:04 Speaker 148: I do not have any questions

00:52:07 Speaker 149: or comments to make, Pam. Thank

00:52:11 Speaker 149: you for bringing this to the

00:52:13 Speaker 149: committee. We greatly appreciate it. I'll

00:52:20 Speaker 149: ask one more time: Does anyone

00:52:22 Speaker 149: have any questions or comments for

00:52:24 Speaker 149: Pam? No. Okay. Thank you, Pam.

00:52:26 Speaker 150: We greatly appreciate it. Okay. I'll

00:52:29 Speaker 151: move on to the next item

00:52:35 Speaker 152: on the agenda, and that is

00:52:38 Speaker 152: other business.

00:52:38 Speaker 152: And I don't see any items on that agenda.

00:52:38 Speaker 152: So the last item would be item number seven, and our next meeting date will be wow, January twelfth, twenty twenty-six.

00:52:39 Speaker 152: Hard to believe we're that close.

8 Adjournment

A speaker called for an adjournment and wished attendees a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

00:52:39 Speaker 152: And I will call for an adjournment at this time.

00:52:39 Speaker 152: Okay.

00:52:39 Speaker 152: Thank you, everyone.

00:52:39 Speaker 152: It was great to see you, and I guess we'll see everybody in the new year.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Merry Christmas and happy new year.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: One more meeting till spring.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Yeah.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: There's optimism.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Yes.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Yeah.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Thanks, everyone.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Take care.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Have a great afternoon.

00:52:40 Speaker 152: Thank you.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.