Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — September 25, 2025
Hook: Feversham Land Acquisition By-law Passed
Grey County · County Council · September 25, 2025
Summary
The County Council met on September 25, 2025 to address by-laws regarding heritage tax refunds and land acquisition for the Feversham paramedic base, alongside updates on community milestones and service recognitions.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- By-laws: Council introduced and passed three bylaws regarding heritage tax refunds, land acquisition for the Feversham paramedic base, and confirmation of proceedings.
- Tunnel Rehabilitation and Road Funding: Council members announced a series of community celebrations including the grand opening of the new Durham Paramedic Base on September 27th featuring a ribbon cutting and open house. The group also celebrated Alan Kenwell for reaching the provincial finals in the Gray Bruce Truck Road Rodeo and hosted the Sydney Fall Fair, noted as the last remaining school-run agricultural fair in Canada with over 800 students attending.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- County Council
- Date
- September 25, 2025
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Council called to order the September 25, 2025 meeting.
00:07:05 Speaker 01: like to call to order this
00:07:07 Speaker 01: Council meeting of September twenty fifth.
00:07:09 Speaker 01: twenty twenty five. At this point
00:07:10 Speaker 01: in time, as you are able,
00:07:12 Speaker 01: please stand and join us in
2 O Canada
Council members sang O Canada while noting absent colleagues including Councillors Mackie, McQueen, Boardinghouse, and Body.
00:07:13 Speaker 02: the singing of "O Canada." O
00:07:37 Speaker 03: Canada. Our home and native land,
00:07:43 Speaker 03: true patriot love in all of
00:07:50 Speaker 04: us command. With glowing hearts, we
00:07:55 Speaker 04: see thee rise, the true North,
00:08:00 Speaker 04: strong and free, Canada. We stand
00:08:05 Speaker 04: on guard for thee, O Canada!
00:08:21 Speaker 04: We stand on guard for. thee.
00:08:28 Speaker 04: Thank you, Madam Clerk. Could you
00:08:34 Speaker 04: please, Councillor Mackie sends his regrets
00:08:43 Speaker 04: today. Councillor McKay, Councillor Carleton, Councillor
00:08:47 Speaker 05: Pringle, Councillor McQueen sends his
00:08:50 Speaker 05: his regrets today. Councillor Allwood,
00:08:53 Speaker 05: Councillor Nielsen, Councillor Patterson, Councillor Dicker,
00:08:56 Speaker 05: Councillor Kentner, Councillor Kivney, Councillor
00:09:01 Speaker 05: Body, I believe, is joining
00:09:04 Speaker 05: us later this morning. Councillor Gregg,
00:09:09 Speaker 05: Councillor Milne, Councillor Dobrine. Word Matrasovs.
00:09:10 Speaker 05: Councillor Boardinghouse says he regrets
00:09:13 Speaker 05: today. Alternate Councillor Hope, Councillor
00:09:16 Speaker 05: Eccles, Councillor Hutchinson. So we have
00:09:18 Speaker 05: all members and attendances today, with
00:09:24 Speaker 05: the exception of Councillors Mackie, McQueen,
00:09:26 Speaker 05: Boardinghouse, and Body. Thank you, Madam
4 Land Acknowledgement
Council members Scott Mackey and Paul McQueen formally acknowledged the gathering takes place on the traditional territories of the Anishinabe Nation, specifically the Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi peoples. The group expressed gratitude to the Saugeen Ojibwe Nation as keepers of these lands and waters since time immemorial while extending dedication to honouring Indigenous history across southern regions including the Six Nations and Grand River territories.
00:09:27 Speaker 05: Clerk. Let us begin by acknowledging,
00:09:33 Speaker 05: with respect, that we are gathered
00:09:37 Speaker 06: on the traditional territory of the
00:09:39 Speaker 06: Anishinabe Nation, the people of the
00:09:41 Speaker 06: Three Fires, known as the Ojibwe,
00:09:44 Speaker 06: the Odawa, the Odawa, and the
00:09:45 Speaker 06: Potawatomi Nations. We give thanks to
00:09:48 Speaker 06: the Chippewas of Saugeen and the
00:09:51 Speaker 06: Chippewas of Nawash, collectively known as
00:09:52 Speaker 06: the Saugeen Ojibwe Nation, the traditional
00:09:55 Speaker 06: keepers of these. lands and waters
00:09:58 Speaker 06: since time immemorial. In our south,
00:10:00 Speaker 06: the traditional territories of the Six
00:10:03 Speaker 06: Nations and of the Grand River
00:10:05 Speaker 06: and the Honechone. We are dedicated
00:10:07 Speaker 06: to honouring Indigenous history and culture,
00:10:10 Speaker 06: and committed to moving forward in
00:10:13 Speaker 06: the spirit of truth, reconciliation, and
00:10:15 Speaker 06: friendship with all First Nations, Métis,
00:10:18 Speaker 06: and Inuit peoples. At this point
00:10:21 Speaker 06: in time, by At this point
00:10:27 Speaker 06: in time, I'd like to put
00:10:28 Speaker 06: out a call if there are
5 Declaration of Interest
Council member Paul McQueen confirmed no declarations of interest were raised before adopting the minutes.
00:10:29 Speaker 06: any declarations of interest for this
00:10:30 Speaker 06: council agenda. Seeing no hands raised,
00:10:34 Speaker 06: we'll move to the adoption of
6.a County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated September 11, 2025
Council adopted minutes for the September 11, 2025 county council and committee of the whole meetings.
00:10:36 Speaker 06: the minutes. It's recommended that the
00:10:37 Speaker 06: minutes of the county council meeting
00:10:38 Speaker 06: and the committee, the whole meeting,
00:10:40 Speaker 06: dated September 11, 2025, and the
00:10:42 Speaker 06: resolutions contained therein be adopted as
00:10:45 Speaker 06: presented. May I ask for a
00:10:47 Speaker 06: mover and a seconder? Moved by
00:10:47 Speaker 06: Councillor Kivney, seconded by Councillor Dobrin.
00:10:50 Speaker 06: Any discussion? All those in favour?
00:10:53 Speaker 06: And that motion is carried. Thank
00:10:55 Speaker 06: you. It's also recommended in item
00:10:57 Speaker 06: six B that the closed session
00:10:59 Speaker 06: committee, the whole meeting minutes, dated
00:11:00 Speaker 06: September 11th, be adopted as provided.
00:11:03 Speaker 06: May I ask, remover, move by
00:11:05 Speaker 06: Councillor Patterson, seconded by Councillor Kentner.
00:11:07 Speaker 06: Any discussion? All those in favour?
00:11:11 Speaker 06: And that motion is carried. We
7 Closed Meeting Matters
Council moved to the bylaws after Paul McQueen confirmed no closed session matters or reports existed.
00:11:14 Speaker 06: do not have any closed session
00:11:16 Speaker 06: matters in council this morning, nor
00:11:17 Speaker 06: reports, so we'll move to the
9 By-laws
Council introduced and passed three bylaws regarding heritage tax refunds, land acquisition for the Feversham paramedic base, and confirmation of proceedings.
00:11:19 Speaker 06: bylaws. It's recommended that bylaw 524925
00:11:21 Speaker 06: and 5250 25 and 52, 50,
00:11:24 Speaker 06: 25 and 52, 51, 25 be
00:11:27 Speaker 06: introduced and taken as read a
00:11:29 Speaker 06: first, second, and third time, finally
00:11:31 Speaker 06: passed, signed with by the warden
00:11:33 Speaker 06: and the clerk, sealed with the
00:11:34 Speaker 06: seal of the corporation, and engrossed
00:11:35 Speaker 06: in the bylaw book. Number one,
00:11:37 Speaker 06: 52, 49, 25, a bylaw to
00:11:40 Speaker 06: provide tax refunds for eligible heritage
00:11:43 Speaker 06: properties. Number two, 52, 25, a
00:11:46 Speaker 06: bylaw to authorise the acquisition of
00:11:48 Speaker 06: certain lands in the municipality of
00:11:50 Speaker 06: Great Highlands for the new Feversham
00:11:52 Speaker 06: paramedic base. Feverston Paramedic Base, and
00:11:54 Speaker 06: number three fifty two fifty one
00:11:56 Speaker 06: twenty five a bylaw to confirm
00:11:58 Speaker 06: all actions and proceedings of council.
00:12:00 Speaker 06: May I ask for a mover?
00:12:03 Speaker 06: Move by alternate Allwood and seconded
00:12:06 Speaker 06: by Councillor Pringle. Any discussion? All
00:12:09 Speaker 06: those in favour? That motion is
00:12:12 Speaker 06: carried. And next, we will move
10 News and Celebrations
Council members announced a series of community celebrations including the grand opening of the new Durham Paramedic Base on September 27th featuring a ribbon cutting and open house. The group also celebrated Alan Kenwell for reaching the provincial finals in the Gray Bruce Truck Road Rodeo and hosted the Sydney Fall Fair, noted as the last remaining school-run agricultural fair in Canada with over 800 students attending. Employee Appreciation Day recognized staff milestones, specifically highlighting three individuals celebrating 30 years of service, Chris Coleman at 35 years, and Joni Johnson and Robert Bell at 40 years. Upcoming events included a National Day of Truth and Reconciliation supper on the following Tuesday, the Apple Harvest Craft Show in Meaford with over 200 vendors, an Inter Township Fire Department awards banquet honouring volunteers for 20 and 15 years of service, and the Rockland Fall Fair pie auction. Additional announcements covered the Tunnel of Mountains Active Farm open fields event at six locations including Mayford, the 50th anniversary of raising the Franco-Ontarian flag at Ecole Saint Dominic Savio School, Holstein's first Oktoberfest on October 27th, and the Bente plowing match south of Elmwood.
00:12:16 Speaker 06: on to news and celebrations. And
00:12:18 Speaker 06: looking to staff first. Okay. Thank
00:12:26 Speaker 07: you, Ward Matrousovs. So I'm excited
00:12:28 Speaker 07: to note that this Saturday, September
00:12:30 Speaker 07: 27th, is the official grand opening
00:12:32 Speaker 07: for the brand new Durham Paramedic
00:12:34 Speaker 07: Base. So from two to four
00:12:36 Speaker 07: p.m., we'll be hosting a ribbon
00:12:37 Speaker 07: cutting and open house. That's all
00:12:39 Speaker 07: about celebrating the incredible work that
00:12:41 Speaker 07: the paramedics do and the investment
00:12:43 Speaker 07: that Council has made in emergency
00:12:45 Speaker 07: care for our communities. Remarks will
00:12:47 Speaker 07: kick off at two o' five,
00:12:49 Speaker 07: followed by a tour of the
00:12:50 Speaker 07: facility and. A tour of the
00:12:51 Speaker 07: facility, an opportunity to meet the
00:12:53 Speaker 07: paramedic team, and check out some
00:12:55 Speaker 07: of our vehicles and equipment up
00:12:58 Speaker 07: close. It's a hands-on, behind-the-scenes look
00:13:00 Speaker 07: at how we're improving response times
00:13:03 Speaker 07: and supporting frontline healthcare. This base
00:13:05 Speaker 07: is a—it's a big step forward,
00:13:06 Speaker 07: not just in infrastructure, but in
00:13:08 Speaker 07: how we serve people across Gray
00:13:10 Speaker 07: County. So, I highly encourage county
00:13:12 Speaker 07: council and residents to join in
00:13:14 Speaker 07: celebrating this exciting milestone, and we
00:13:19 Speaker 07: hope to see you there. Thank
00:13:20 Speaker 07: you. very much, CAO. I look
00:13:22 Speaker 06: forward to attending that with my
00:13:25 Speaker 06: granddaughter, actually. And next, we'll go
00:13:26 Speaker 06: on to Director Hoyt. You have
00:13:30 Speaker 06: an announcement. Yes, I just wanted
00:13:32 Speaker 06: to congratulate Alan Kenwell out of
00:13:35 Speaker 08: our Clarksville Patrol. He had previously
00:13:37 Speaker 08: won the Gray Bruce Truck Road
00:13:41 Speaker 08: Rodeo, not Rodeo Road A O,
00:13:44 Speaker 08: which was thirty-six operators. So, Al
00:13:45 Speaker 08: won that, and he got to
00:13:47 Speaker 08: go to the provincial finals yesterday
00:13:49 Speaker 08: in Lanark. and although we didn't
00:13:50 Speaker 08: win, we're very proud of Al.
00:13:52 Speaker 08: It's hard to make the finals,
00:13:54 Speaker 08: and so there was 49 drivers
00:13:55 Speaker 08: there from across the province in
00:13:56 Speaker 08: Lanark yesterday. It's not that often
00:13:58 Speaker 08: we send somebody to the the
00:13:59 Speaker 08: finals, so we're very proud of
00:14:03 Speaker 08: Al for going to compete yesterday.
00:14:06 Speaker 08: Excellent and congratulations to Mr. Kenwell.
00:14:08 Speaker 08: And with that, we'll move on
00:14:12 Speaker 08: to Director Myers for an announcement.
00:14:13 Speaker 09: Thank you so much. Good morning.
00:14:14 Speaker 09: I think Brittany's going to help
00:14:16 Speaker 09: me with a quick little video
00:14:17 Speaker 09: here. but we wanted to share
00:14:19 Speaker 09: the good news that last Thursday
00:14:21 Speaker 09: we were very proud to host
00:14:24 Speaker 09: the Sydney Fall Fair at Sydney
00:14:25 Speaker 09: Campus. So it is the last
00:14:28 Speaker 09: remaining school-run agricultural fair in all
00:14:29 Speaker 09: of Canada. There were more than
00:14:31 Speaker 09: 800 students who attended that day.
00:14:33 Speaker 09: All the educational exhibits happened in
00:14:34 Speaker 09: the gym, and then the fair
00:14:35 Speaker 09: outside that you're going to see
00:14:37 Speaker 09: the video of here. That was
00:14:39 Speaker 09: livestock, pet, and zoo shows all
00:14:39 Speaker 09: in the green space. It was
00:14:41 Speaker 09: a great day, lots of energy
00:14:47 Speaker 06: at Sydney Campus. Thank you. Wonderful
00:14:48 Speaker 06: tradition in the fall fairs of
00:14:50 Speaker 06: our county, and with that, we
00:14:55 Speaker 06: will go to Director Morrow. Thank
00:14:56 Speaker 06: you. I wanted to share the
00:14:58 Speaker 10: news that this week on Tuesday
00:15:02 Speaker 10: we had our Employee Appreciation Day,
00:15:03 Speaker 10: and as part of that, we
00:15:07 Speaker 10: celebrate long-term career milestones within Gray
00:15:09 Speaker 10: County at every five-year increment, and
00:15:13 Speaker 10: we celebrated 126 staff members on
00:15:14 Speaker 10: Tuesday afternoon. and I just wanted
00:15:18 Speaker 10: to detail those that have been
00:15:20 Speaker 10: with us the longest within those
00:15:23 Speaker 10: milestones, and that is celebrating 30
00:15:24 Speaker 10: years of a career with Gray
00:15:28 Speaker 10: County from Paramedic Services, Diana Graham,
00:15:30 Speaker 10: from Lee Manor, our long-term care
00:15:32 Speaker 10: home in Owen Sound, Lisa Barfoot
00:15:36 Speaker 10: and Lorna Walker, from Rockwood Terrace,
00:15:38 Speaker 10: our long-term care home in Durham,
00:15:41 Speaker 10: Erin Grant, and from the Transportation
00:15:46 Speaker 10: Services Department. Chris Coleman, celebrating 35
00:15:48 Speaker 10: years of a career with Gray
00:15:50 Speaker 10: County. From our Social Services team
00:15:53 Speaker 10: is Joni Johnson, and at 40
00:15:55 Speaker 10: years of service with Gray County
00:15:58 Speaker 10: from Paramedic Services was Robert Bell.
00:16:00 Speaker 10: We thank all of them for
00:16:11 Speaker 10: their dedication and service to Gray
00:16:13 Speaker 01: County. Thank you, Director Morrow. And
00:16:14 Speaker 01: it was a pleasure for the
00:16:16 Speaker 01: Deputy CAO and the CAO and
00:16:17 Speaker 01: myself to be able to attend
00:16:19 Speaker 01: to help with that presentation of
00:16:22 Speaker 01: those certificates. It is an incredible,
00:16:24 Speaker 01: not just an incredible mark of
00:16:25 Speaker 01: their own dedication, but it's also
00:16:28 Speaker 01: so aspirational to see among the
00:16:31 Speaker 01: the newer comers to our staff
00:16:32 Speaker 01: that people come here, they stay
00:16:35 Speaker 01: here, they grow their careers professionally,
00:16:37 Speaker 01: and they truly see our staff
00:16:38 Speaker 01: and our council here as a
00:16:41 Speaker 01: family. So. it's wonderful. Okay, so
00:16:42 Speaker 01: with that, I'd like to put
00:16:44 Speaker 01: it out to the County Council
00:16:45 Speaker 01: floor for news and celebrations. We'll
00:16:49 Speaker 01: begin with the Deputy Warden. Thank
00:16:52 Speaker 11: you, Madam Warden. Next Tuesday, of
00:16:53 Speaker 11: course, is National Day of Truth
00:16:57 Speaker 11: and Reconciliation, and in conjunction with
00:16:59 Speaker 11: Southeast Grey Community Health Centre and
00:17:02 Speaker 11: Junction Community Initiatives, there will be
00:17:04 Speaker 11: an event at the United Church
00:17:06 Speaker 11: in Dundalk from five till eight
00:17:10 Speaker 11: to mark that occasion, and all
00:17:12 Speaker 11: are invited. There's going to be
00:17:14 Speaker 11: a supper at seven o'clock. I'm
00:17:15 Speaker 11: not saying that's why I'm going,
00:17:17 Speaker 11: but it doesn't hurt to have
00:17:22 Speaker 11: supper. But all are welcome to
00:17:24 Speaker 11: attend. It'll be a great event,
00:17:26 Speaker 12: and I welcome everyone to attend.
00:17:29 Speaker 13: Thank you, Deputy Warden. It's not
00:17:31 Speaker 13: just dinner, is it? It's fellowship,
00:17:33 Speaker 13: it's friendship, it's gathering together together
00:17:35 Speaker 13: at a table. So absolutely, we
00:17:39 Speaker 13: should. celebrate those moments together, and
00:17:42 Speaker 14: we'll go to Councillor Kevney. Thank
00:17:44 Speaker 14: you, Madam Warden, and good morning,
00:17:45 Speaker 14: everyone. And I just wanted to
00:17:48 Speaker 14: announce that next weekend, October the
00:17:50 Speaker 14: fourth and fifth, is our annual
00:17:52 Speaker 14: Apple Harvest Craft Show in Meaford.
00:17:53 Speaker 14: This is one of the top
00:17:56 Speaker 14: artisan shows in all of Ontario,
00:17:58 Speaker 14: with over two hundred vendors, many
00:18:00 Speaker 14: new ones this year. On the
00:18:01 Speaker 14: Saturday, it will be open from
00:18:02 Speaker 14: ten until six, and on the
00:18:04 Speaker 14: Sunday, although the power is supposed
00:18:04 Speaker 14: to be out. until noon, and
00:18:06 Speaker 14: we're working on that, but from
00:18:08 Speaker 14: ten until four, the scheduled hours
00:18:09 Speaker 14: at the community centre, the curling
00:18:12 Speaker 14: club, and the arena in Meaford,
00:18:13 Speaker 14: this event's been going for over
00:18:15 Speaker 14: forty years in our community, which
00:18:16 Speaker 14: is pretty incredible. And they've donated
00:18:18 Speaker 14: over a million dollars into the
00:18:20 Speaker 14: community, to our hospital and other
00:18:22 Speaker 14: projects. So it's it's pretty special.
00:18:23 Speaker 14: So come on out and start
00:18:24 Speaker 14: your Christmas shopping in Meaford next
00:18:32 Speaker 15: weekend. Thank you. Okay, we'll go
00:18:35 Speaker 15: over to Councillor Carl. Okay, we'll
00:18:38 Speaker 15: go over to Councillor Carleton. Thank
00:18:40 Speaker 15: you, Warden, and good morning, County
00:18:42 Speaker 15: Council. I would just like to
00:18:44 Speaker 15: somewhat reflect on an awards banquet
00:18:46 Speaker 15: for Inter Township Fire Department last
00:18:49 Speaker 15: Saturday night, and Deputy Mayor Kevany
00:18:52 Speaker 15: joined me as well at that.
00:18:54 Speaker 15: We had four of our volunteers
00:18:59 Speaker 15: celebrating twenty years of service, two
00:19:01 Speaker 15: celebrating fifteen. Deputy Mayor Kevany gave
00:19:05 Speaker 15: a special award to Jeff Freeze.
00:19:07 Speaker 15: Award to Jeffrey, his life saving
00:19:10 Speaker 15: skills that he used at an
00:19:12 Speaker 15: event they were at, and a
00:19:14 Speaker 15: second outstanding award, service award was
00:19:17 Speaker 15: presented to the twenty four firefighters
00:19:19 Speaker 15: who responded to the silo collapse
00:19:20 Speaker 15: rescue last October. So it was
00:19:22 Speaker 15: wonderful evening, a great way to
00:19:24 Speaker 16: say thank you to all of
00:19:28 Speaker 17: our volunteer firefighters and thank you
00:19:32 Speaker 17: to Shirley for being there with
00:19:33 Speaker 17: us. Thank you, and welcome back
00:19:35 Speaker 17: to Councillor Nielsen. And we'll go
00:19:36 Speaker 17: over to Councillor Nielsen. Thank you
00:19:40 Speaker 17: very much, Ward Matrosov. Grey Highlands'
00:19:42 Speaker 17: last, but certainly not least, fall
00:19:44 Speaker 17: fair of the fall fair season
00:19:46 Speaker 17: is this Saturday, September 27th, at
00:19:49 Speaker 17: the Rockland Fall Fair. You are
00:19:53 Speaker 17: welcome to come out and participate
00:19:55 Speaker 17: in our annual pie making contest—not
00:19:56 Speaker 17: contest, I guess, auction. All the
00:19:57 Speaker 17: county council members are welcome to
00:19:58 Speaker 17: make pies. We auction them off
00:19:59 Speaker 17: at the end of the night.
00:20:00 Speaker 17: If you don't want to make
00:20:01 Speaker 17: a pie, feel free to come
00:20:02 Speaker 17: and bring. your wallet. That's even
00:20:03 Speaker 17: more appreciated. But it should be
00:20:08 Speaker 17: a good time had by all,
00:20:10 Speaker 17: and hopefully we'll see somebody out.
00:20:11 Speaker 18: Sorry, it's competing with the paramedic
00:20:17 Speaker 18: base open. Okay, all right, and
00:20:19 Speaker 18: we'll go to Councillor Hope, and
00:20:22 Speaker 18: then to Councillor Body after that.
00:20:25 Speaker 18: Yes. Good morning. Just wanted to
00:20:28 Speaker 18: let everyone know that the Tunnel
00:20:30 Speaker 18: of Mountains will be holding its
00:20:32 Speaker 18: open fields in celebration of Active
00:20:33 Speaker 18: Farm. So there's six different locations,
00:20:37 Speaker 18: and they do include locations in
00:20:40 Speaker 18: Mayford, including Coffin Bridge, which is
00:20:41 Speaker 18: not far from my family's farm.
00:20:43 Speaker 18: So it's a free event. It's
00:20:45 Speaker 18: a wonderful family event, and there's
00:20:47 Speaker 18: a lot of focus on cider
00:20:48 Speaker 18: this year. So it's from ten
00:20:54 Speaker 18: till four o'clock on this coming
00:20:55 Speaker 18: Saturday, and I I hope everyone
00:20:57 Speaker 18: will be able to join us.
00:20:59 Speaker 18: Thank you. Thank you very much,
00:21:02 Speaker 18: and you can go. to exploreblue.ca
00:21:04 Speaker 18: if you want to get those
00:21:07 Speaker 18: details and those locations. And we'll
00:21:09 Speaker 19: go to Councillor Body. Thank you,
00:21:12 Speaker 19: Warden. Sorry for being a little
00:21:15 Speaker 19: late. I was just with the
00:21:16 Speaker 19: students and teachers at the Ecole
00:21:19 Speaker 19: Saint Dominic Savio School, French School,
00:21:23 Speaker 19: raising the Franco-Ontarian flag. It's an
00:21:26 Speaker 19: annual event in our community flagpole.
00:21:27 Speaker 19: This is the 50th anniversary of
00:21:31 Speaker 19: the Franco-Ontarian flag. Franco-Ontarian. Franco Ontario
00:21:32 Speaker 19: and community goes back 400 years
00:21:35 Speaker 19: because it goes back to 1613
00:21:37 Speaker 19: when Samuel de Champlain traveled through
00:21:39 Speaker 19: and mapped this part of the
00:21:41 Speaker 19: area, including Georgian Bay and the
00:21:42 Speaker 19: area near On Sound. There was
00:21:47 Speaker 19: also a French village, approximately 100
00:21:50 Speaker 19: years ago, between On Sound and
00:21:51 Speaker 19: Leith that was quite a community.
00:21:53 Speaker 19: Probably French trappers, way back when,
00:21:56 Speaker 19: that stuck around. So, this is
00:21:57 Speaker 19: one of my favourite mornings. Be
00:22:01 Speaker 19: Favourite mornings because this is a
00:22:06 Speaker 01: culture that sings, and all the
00:22:09 Speaker 01: kids sing French songs, and it's
00:22:13 Speaker 01: amazing. So, it's it's worth celebrating.
00:22:17 Speaker 20: Thank you. Thank you. Merci beaucoup.
00:22:20 Speaker 20: A félicitations. Our whole community, our
00:22:23 Speaker 20: whole francophone community across our county,
00:22:27 Speaker 20: and Councillor Dubrein. Thank you, Warden,
00:22:29 Speaker 20: and good morning, County Council. Those
00:22:32 Speaker 20: listening, Holstein is. celebrating its first
00:22:35 Speaker 20: Oktoberfest on Saturday, October 27th. There
00:22:38 Speaker 20: will be a cornhole tournament for
00:22:41 Speaker 20: those who enjoy that, starting at
00:22:44 Speaker 20: 3 p.m. with live music at
00:22:46 Speaker 20: 4, dinner at 6, and it
00:22:48 Speaker 20: is at the Holstein Optimist Hall.
00:22:53 Speaker 21: Holstein Fest this Saturday, September 27th.
00:22:55 Speaker 21: Tickets are on sale. If you
00:22:56 Speaker 21: are interested, let me know and
00:22:59 Speaker 22: I can give you the contact.
00:23:04 Speaker 23: information. Thank you very much, and
00:23:05 Speaker 23: I'll just look to see if
00:23:08 Speaker 23: there's a. We'll go to Councillor
00:23:12 Speaker 23: Eccles. This works. Thank you, and
00:23:14 Speaker 23: I would very much like to
00:23:17 Speaker 23: take up the offer from the
00:23:20 Speaker 23: Deputy Warden. His pie eating capabilities
00:23:23 Speaker 23: are tremendous, so he'll probably be
00:23:27 Speaker 23: in Rockland buying up pies. He's
00:23:29 Speaker 23: well noted for that. for sure.
00:23:32 Speaker 23: This Saturday, before you come to
00:23:35 Speaker 23: the paramedic opening at two o'clock
00:23:37 Speaker 23: in Westbury, as the CEO has
00:23:41 Speaker 23: mentioned, the last that I understand
00:23:43 Speaker 23: of the local plowing matches, the
00:23:45 Speaker 23: Bente plowing match is on, just
00:23:47 Speaker 23: south of Elmwood, about half a
00:23:51 Speaker 23: mile, the first corner south of
00:23:56 Speaker 23: Elmwood, off the county line, and
00:23:58 Speaker 23: in about a half. a mile
00:24:00 Speaker 23: on the eighth concession of Bentek,
00:24:03 Speaker 23: great support for our agricultural community.
00:24:06 Speaker 23: As you know, it was very
00:24:11 Speaker 23: successful. We had the Canadian Championships
00:24:12 Speaker 23: in Westray back at the end
00:24:16 Speaker 23: of August. It was tremendous, and
00:24:18 Speaker 23: sent a local individual, Brian Davenport,
00:24:20 Speaker 23: won the competition, and will be
00:24:24 Speaker 23: representing Canada at the Worlds. next
00:24:27 Speaker 23: year, and I just forgot where
00:24:29 Speaker 23: they are next year. I know
00:24:33 Speaker 23: that they're in Czechoslovakia this year.
00:24:34 Speaker 23: Anyways, tremendous, but an aspect of
00:24:37 Speaker 23: our agricultural community that was there.
00:24:42 Speaker 23: Ten o'clock, the plowing will start.
00:24:43 Speaker 23: So we have a chance to
00:24:46 Speaker 23: help out and endorse our support
00:24:48 Speaker 23: for our agricultural community. Thank you.
00:24:50 Speaker 01: Thank you very much. I'll just.
00:24:51 Speaker 01: look around the horseshoe. I don't
00:24:54 Speaker 01: see any further hands. Excellent. So
00:24:55 Speaker 01: lots happening in our county. Lots
00:24:58 Speaker 01: to enjoy. Lots of reasons to
00:24:59 Speaker 01: cross the boundaries and visit
00:25:01 Speaker 01: another municipality. So with that, then
00:25:04 Speaker 01: we will look for a motion
11 Adjournment
Council adjourned after a procedural motion was moved and seconded.
00:25:05 Speaker 01: to adjourn. May I have? I'll
00:25:22 Speaker 01: move by Councillor Patterson, seconded by
00:25:24 Speaker 01: Councillor McKay. All those in favour?
00:25:25 Speaker 01: And council adjourned. We'll give a
00:25:26 Speaker 01: moment for the technology to switch
00:25:28 Speaker 01: over. Okay. Thank you. I'd like
00:25:29 Speaker 01: to call to order this committee.
00:25:31 Speaker 01: The whole meeting of September twenty
00:25:34 Speaker 01: fifth, twenty twenty five. At this
00:25:36 Speaker 01: point in time, I'll put out
00:25:39 Speaker 01: a call. Are there any declarations
00:25:40 Speaker 01: of interest for this agenda? Seeing
00:25:42 Speaker 01: no hands raised, we will carry
00:25:43 Speaker 01: on business arising from the
00:25:45 Speaker 01: minutes. Okay. We will move on.
00:25:48 Speaker 01: We do not have. any delegations
00:25:49 Speaker 01: today. And next, we will move
00:25:52 Speaker 01: on to the determination of items
00:25:53 Speaker 01: requiring separate discussion from Section C,
00:25:55 Speaker 01: Section Six. In the consent agenda,
00:25:56 Speaker 01: there are four different items. So
00:26:01 Speaker 01: I will ask for if there
00:26:04 Speaker 01: are any that need to be
00:26:07 Speaker 01: pulled to examine at the end
00:26:10 Speaker 01: of today's agenda. Councillor Eccles. I'd
00:26:12 Speaker 01: like to pull Six C. Just
00:26:14 Speaker 01: to make sure that we've got
00:26:16 Speaker 01: that clear. Okay. Thank you. Anything
00:26:17 Speaker 01: else? Okay. Then it's recommended that
00:26:19 Speaker 01: the following consent agendas be received,
00:26:21 Speaker 01: and that staff be authorised to
00:26:23 Speaker 01: take actions necessary to give effect
00:26:24 Speaker 01: to the recommendations in the staff
00:26:30 Speaker 01: reports, and that the correspondence be
00:26:33 Speaker 01: supported and received for information as
00:26:41 Speaker 01: recommended in the consent agenda. May
00:26:44 Speaker 01: ask for mover and a seconder.
00:26:46 Speaker 01: Moved by. Excuse me. Moved over
00:26:48 Speaker 01: here to my right. Sorry about
00:26:52 Speaker 01: that. We'll need a seconder, and
00:26:54 Speaker 01: seconded by the deputy ordnance. Any
00:26:57 Speaker 01: discussion? All those in favour? And
00:26:59 Speaker 01: that motion is carried. Okay, so
00:27:00 Speaker 01: we will then visit 6D at
00:27:02 Speaker 01: the end of our agenda. Thank
00:27:06 Speaker 01: you. That allows us to move
00:27:09 Speaker 01: on into our items for direction
00:27:11 Speaker 01: and discussion. So the first one
00:27:15 Speaker 01: is item 7A, and it's recommended
00:27:18 Speaker 01: that. staff report PDR CW fifty
00:27:20 Speaker 01: seven twenty five regarding surplus lands
00:27:23 Speaker 01: for housing site preparation and derisking
00:27:25 Speaker 01: and derisking activities be received, and
00:27:26 Speaker 01: that one hundred and thirty thousand
00:27:29 Speaker 01: dollars be included in the proposed
00:27:33 Speaker 01: twenty twenty six budget and be
00:27:35 Speaker 01: funded from the one time funding
00:27:36 Speaker 01: reserve to fund select site preparation
00:27:40 Speaker 01: and derisking activities for the two
00:27:41 Speaker 01: county owned properties in Markdale. County-owned
00:27:43 Speaker 01: properties in Markdale and Durham may
00:27:45 Speaker 01: ask for a mover and a
00:27:47 Speaker 24: seconder. Move by Councillor Nielsen. Seconder.
00:28:00 Speaker 24: It's now on the floor for
00:28:01 Speaker 25: discussion. So I would like to
00:28:03 Speaker 25: invite our senior policy planner, Buckton,
00:28:04 Speaker 25: up to introduce the topic. Thank
00:28:07 Speaker 25: you. Wonderful. Thank you so much.
00:28:08 Speaker 25: I'm really happy to be here
00:28:11 Speaker 25: today. So I think Brittany's just
00:28:13 Speaker 25: going to pull up there, really.
00:28:14 Speaker 25: Some slides for us. Great. So
00:28:16 Speaker 25: very briefly today, I know there
00:28:21 Speaker 25: was is a very comprehensive report
00:28:22 Speaker 25: addressing what we'd like to do
00:28:23 Speaker 25: with respect to these lands, but
00:28:24 Speaker 25: I've just captured that recommendation here
00:28:25 Speaker 25: as well. Next slide, please. So
00:28:27 Speaker 25: we just really wanted to provide
00:28:30 Speaker 25: a bit of a visual anchor
00:28:31 Speaker 25: for you. I know we've got
00:28:33 Speaker 25: some key maps in the report,
00:28:35 Speaker 25: but I've also included some aerials
00:28:37 Speaker 25: here. So just wanted to identify
00:28:41 Speaker 25: that you know we have been
00:28:42 Speaker 25: having. some discussion regarding surplus lands
00:28:43 Speaker 25: for for a number of years
00:28:46 Speaker 25: now. We've been progressing as staff
00:28:49 Speaker 25: to do investigations around two potentially
00:28:51 Speaker 25: surplus parcels. That would certainly be
00:28:52 Speaker 25: a future discussion that we would
00:28:55 Speaker 25: have with council around their fate.
00:28:57 Speaker 25: But but essentially, we've been evaluating
00:28:59 Speaker 25: them with respect to their housing
00:29:01 Speaker 25: potential and what we might need
00:29:02 Speaker 25: to do to prepare those lands
00:29:04 Speaker 25: to be readily available for future
00:29:06 Speaker 25: construction, either by the county in
00:29:09 Speaker 25: partnership or by. others through an
00:29:11 Speaker 25: offering. So we do have a
00:29:13 Speaker 25: smaller parcel in Markdale, and then
00:29:14 Speaker 25: a larger parcel of about twenty
00:29:16 Speaker 25: acres in Durham that we've been
00:29:18 Speaker 25: investigating over the past few years.
00:29:21 Speaker 25: Next slide, please. Okay, and just
00:29:23 Speaker 25: a little bit of
00:29:25 Speaker 25: a zoomed-in view here. So with
00:29:26 Speaker 25: respect to the work that we
00:29:29 Speaker 25: are requesting funds or budget consideration
00:29:31 Speaker 25: for, with respect to the
00:29:33 Speaker 25: Markdale site, that would include archaeological
00:29:35 Speaker 25: assessment, an environmental assessment, and filing
00:29:37 Speaker 25: of a record of site condition.
00:29:39 Speaker 25: and some site servicing work. We've
00:29:40 Speaker 25: been fortunate to be coordinating together
00:29:42 Speaker 25: with transportation services staff. There, there
00:29:43 Speaker 25: is some upgrade happening right now
00:29:45 Speaker 25: to Great Ridge Road, just abutting
00:29:47 Speaker 25: this parcel as well. So, as
00:29:49 Speaker 25: noted in the report, there are
00:29:51 Speaker 25: some elements of that site preparation
00:29:53 Speaker 25: that we think will fall
00:29:55 Speaker 25: under that project and that that
00:29:57 Speaker 25: cost umbrella. But these, this would
00:29:59 Speaker 25: respect. Sorry, this would identify those
00:30:01 Speaker 25: additional items that we may be
00:30:03 Speaker 25: looking to to really establish the
00:30:05 Speaker 25: principle for residential development on the
00:30:07 Speaker 25: lands. and remove some of the
00:30:10 Speaker 25: uncertainty. With respect to the Durham
00:30:12 Speaker 25: site, we would be looking there
00:30:13 Speaker 25: for some funding to support us
00:30:15 Speaker 25: in identifying stormwater management pond sizing.
00:30:17 Speaker 25: We do understand there will be
00:30:19 Speaker 25: a fairly large stormwater facility required
00:30:21 Speaker 25: on that land, and that's a
00:30:22 Speaker 25: bit of a challenge in terms
00:30:25 Speaker 25: of identifying the potential for those
00:30:26 Speaker 25: lands just in relation to the
00:30:28 Speaker 25: footprint that that facility might take
00:30:31 Speaker 25: up. So we do want to
00:30:33 Speaker 25: do a little bit of additional
00:30:34 Speaker 25: work to just identify. To to
00:30:36 Speaker 25: just identify how much of a
00:30:40 Speaker 25: footprint that will take to help
00:30:41 Speaker 25: us understand what remains for development
00:30:44 Speaker 25: potential, and then I think there's
00:30:47 Speaker 25: some conversation to happen as well
00:30:48 Speaker 25: regarding a stormwater outlet for that
00:30:51 Speaker 25: site as well. So certainly happy
00:30:53 Speaker 25: to address questions, but what I
00:30:55 Speaker 25: would say is that you know
00:30:57 Speaker 25: we we we have put forward
00:31:00 Speaker 25: these activities not just on our
00:31:00 Speaker 25: own assessment but with some input
00:31:04 Speaker 25: as well from the development sector.
00:31:06 Speaker 25: We did have an opportunity. to
00:31:07 Speaker 25: meet with some folks in August
00:31:10 Speaker 25: to have a discussion with four
00:31:12 Speaker 25: and nonprofit developers, as well as
00:31:15 Speaker 25: some of the housing operators locally,
00:31:16 Speaker 25: around kind of what what makes
00:31:18 Speaker 25: the site attractive, or what rules
00:31:20 Speaker 25: the site out for them to
00:31:21 Speaker 25: consider around partnership and offering. And
00:31:23 Speaker 25: so, really, it is this de-risking
00:31:26 Speaker 25: and then providing that security around
00:31:26 Speaker 25: potential that allows a project to
00:31:29 Speaker 25: go forward if we were to
00:31:31 Speaker 25: surplus them. But regardless of what
00:31:34 Speaker 25: we decide to do with respect.
00:31:36 Speaker 25: to those lands in future, we
00:31:37 Speaker 25: anticipate that this information will be
00:31:42 Speaker 25: good for us to have, and
00:31:45 Speaker 25: and would you know represent a
00:31:51 Speaker 26: good investment in those lands and
00:31:52 Speaker 26: furthering their potential for future use.
00:31:54 Speaker 26: So I'll I'll leave it there,
00:31:56 Speaker 26: but like I say, happy to
00:31:59 Speaker 26: address any questions. Okay, so do
00:32:00 Speaker 26: we have any questions? Look for
00:32:02 Speaker 26: hands. We'll go to Councillor Nielsen.
00:32:04 Speaker 26: Thank you very much, Ward Microsoft.
00:32:06 Speaker 26: Just two two questions. My first
00:32:07 Speaker 26: question regarding the Markdale site in
00:32:10 Speaker 26: within the report, the Durham site
00:32:13 Speaker 26: suggested the possibility of up to
00:32:15 Speaker 26: like 200 units because of the
00:32:17 Speaker 26: size of the property. Is there
00:32:19 Speaker 26: an estimate of what we could
00:32:20 Speaker 26: possibly obtain out of the Markdale
00:32:21 Speaker 26: site for one and two? Just
00:32:23 Speaker 26: in consideration of that estimate, Grey
00:32:24 Speaker 26: Highlands recently rezoned a property very
00:32:26 Speaker 26: near to this one with approval
00:32:31 Speaker 25: for up to a six-story building.
00:32:32 Speaker 25: So. I'm just wondering if that's
00:32:33 Speaker 25: taken into consideration in terms of
00:32:34 Speaker 25: the type of housing, the accommodations,
00:32:36 Speaker 25: and then maybe the number of
00:32:38 Speaker 25: units we could potentially get out
00:32:40 Speaker 25: of that site. Wonderful, through you,
00:32:42 Speaker 25: Madam Warden. So, you know, with
00:32:44 Speaker 25: respect to the number of units,
00:32:45 Speaker 25: I do think it will depend
00:32:47 Speaker 25: a little bit on the form
00:32:49 Speaker 25: of building that might be considered
00:32:50 Speaker 25: for the lands. You know, with
00:32:52 Speaker 25: consideration to that adjacent six-story building
00:32:55 Speaker 25: and the trail corridor kind of
00:32:56 Speaker 25: going in between them, I do
00:32:57 Speaker 25: think we anticipate that probably a
00:32:59 Speaker 25: tall multi-story. building tucked right up
00:33:02 Speaker 25: on the other side of the
00:33:03 Speaker 25: trail would not be so desirable.
00:33:04 Speaker 25: But perhaps there would be opportunity
00:33:07 Speaker 25: to to push something kind of
00:33:08 Speaker 25: along the lot line, or or
00:33:10 Speaker 25: look at even a stacked row
00:33:11 Speaker 25: house type of development along the
00:33:14 Speaker 25: side. When we we looked
00:33:16 Speaker 25: at it, you know, we looked
00:33:17 Speaker 25: through the lines of minimum development
00:33:19 Speaker 25: density based on our policy, and
00:33:26 Speaker 25: so that would be 25 units
00:33:28 Speaker 25: per net hectare. So for this
00:33:30 Speaker 25: site, I think it's around 18
00:33:32 Speaker 26: units minimum. But I would anticipate
00:33:33 Speaker 26: probably something. more in the range
00:33:37 Speaker 26: of forty to sixty would be
00:33:39 Speaker 26: realistic for viability on the site.
00:33:41 Speaker 26: Thank you for that answer. And
00:33:44 Speaker 26: through you, Ward Microsoft. So, second
00:33:46 Speaker 26: question on the Durham site: when
00:33:49 Speaker 26: calculating the stormwater pond, it's kind
00:33:51 Speaker 26: of the same conundrum—is where you
00:33:53 Speaker 26: have to presuppose the form in
00:33:55 Speaker 26: which it's going to take.
00:33:58 Speaker 26: So, just my understanding of the
00:33:59 Speaker 26: land use would be. if you're
00:34:03 Speaker 26: trying to do subdivision style, you
00:34:04 Speaker 26: might need a larger stormwater pond
00:34:06 Speaker 25: than if you did apartment style.
00:34:08 Speaker 25: So I'm just wondering, in terms
00:34:11 Speaker 25: of council county staff's estimates, when
00:34:13 Speaker 25: calculating the stormwater pond, the form
00:34:15 Speaker 25: style might take. Wonderful, and again,
00:34:17 Speaker 25: thank you, Madam Warden. I thank
00:34:18 Speaker 25: you so much for that question.
00:34:20 Speaker 25: Yes, so with the Durham site,
00:34:21 Speaker 25: there has been some prior
00:34:24 Speaker 25: investigation completed. So with respect to
00:34:26 Speaker 25: the Rockwood Terrace. builds that that
00:34:29 Speaker 25: parcel was all one piece to
00:34:30 Speaker 25: begin with, so we do have
00:34:34 Speaker 25: some prior hydrogeological work that's been
00:34:35 Speaker 25: done, including boreholes across the site.
00:34:37 Speaker 25: So we do have some understanding
00:34:39 Speaker 25: of the hydrogeological situation there. There
00:34:42 Speaker 25: was initially a proposal to place
00:34:44 Speaker 25: the drainage for Rockwood Terrace on
00:34:46 Speaker 25: this parcel. So we've seen a
00:34:48 Speaker 25: preliminary design, but there were some
00:34:51 Speaker 25: assumptions I think tied with that
00:34:53 Speaker 25: that might not hold true in
00:34:55 Speaker 25: development of just this parcel. They
00:34:57 Speaker 25: did provide. us with a volume
00:34:59 Speaker 25: estimate of what was expected to
00:35:02 Speaker 25: need to be held, and so
00:35:03 Speaker 25: it's really translating that volume estimate
00:35:04 Speaker 25: into a spatial estimate to understand
00:35:05 Speaker 25: the footprint piece. In terms of
00:35:08 Speaker 25: the form of development for those
00:35:09 Speaker 25: lands, you're right; it's it's a
00:35:11 Speaker 25: larger parcel. There's the potential maybe
00:35:13 Speaker 25: for multiple road frontages with that
00:35:14 Speaker 25: as well. So I I could
00:35:15 Speaker 25: see it having it could go
00:35:17 Speaker 25: a number of ways. We could
00:35:20 Speaker 25: see some traditional subdivision type of
00:35:22 Speaker 25: development in a portion of that
00:35:24 Speaker 25: lands. if they could have room
00:35:27 Speaker 25: for a multi-residential as well, so
00:35:28 Speaker 25: I think that one has some
00:35:29 Speaker 25: potential to do a few things
00:35:31 Speaker 25: with. We have talked about does
00:35:32 Speaker 25: it make sense for for us,
00:35:33 Speaker 25: for example, to forward a a
00:35:35 Speaker 27: lot plan to try and divide
00:35:40 Speaker 27: it out into parcels. I'm not
00:35:42 Speaker 27: sure that that that's necessarily the
00:35:44 Speaker 27: way that we would recommend going
00:35:45 Speaker 27: at this point, but I think
00:35:46 Speaker 27: the information around the storm pond
00:35:48 Speaker 27: will certainly inform us in terms
00:35:49 Speaker 27: of what we've got to work
00:35:51 Speaker 27: with, and we can reevaluate that.
00:35:56 Speaker 11: Okay, sir. Thank you, and certainly,
00:35:57 Speaker 11: as you mentioned, what we're looking
00:36:02 Speaker 11: at approving right now will add
00:36:04 Speaker 11: value to the property. It will
00:36:07 Speaker 11: give us that information so that
00:36:10 Speaker 11: we can do those further explorations
00:36:12 Speaker 11: down the road. Okay, we'll go
00:36:14 Speaker 11: to the deputy warden. Thank you,
00:36:16 Speaker 11: Madam Warden. Thank you, Liz, for
00:36:21 Speaker 11: the presentation, or the report rather.
00:36:22 Speaker 11: Why, on the derm site, are
00:36:23 Speaker 11: we not proposing to do an
00:36:25 Speaker 11: archaeological phase? one, at least, to
00:36:28 Speaker 11: because I would think that would
00:36:29 Speaker 25: be a risk to any developer
00:36:31 Speaker 25: as to what might or might
00:36:34 Speaker 25: not be there. Please try that
00:36:38 Speaker 25: again. The microphones are always tricky.
00:36:39 Speaker 25: Thank you so much for that
00:36:41 Speaker 25: question and for you. So in
00:36:43 Speaker 25: that case, the archaeological is already
00:36:49 Speaker 25: completed. So as part of that
00:36:52 Speaker 28: early work, the archaeological was completed
00:36:54 Speaker 28: for the whole site. There, there,
00:36:59 Speaker 23: that report found no, no. items
00:37:03 Speaker 23: of cultural heritage value, and they've
00:37:06 Speaker 23: recommended no further study for the
00:37:09 Speaker 23: site. So, thankfully, that one's off
00:37:11 Speaker 23: the list already. Check. Okay. Any
00:37:14 Speaker 23: further questions? Yes, we'll go to
00:37:16 Speaker 23: Councillor Eccles. Thank you, Madam Warden,
00:37:18 Speaker 23: through you to Liz. I think
00:37:22 Speaker 23: I'll probably state the obvious here
00:37:24 Speaker 23: that working with Councilman Nielsen, some
00:37:26 Speaker 23: of your concerns on the stormwater,
00:37:29 Speaker 23: that portion at the town of
00:37:31 Speaker 23: Durham, West Grey has a 10-year
00:37:32 Speaker 23: projection. There will be work being
00:37:38 Speaker 23: done on Sadler Street as you
00:37:40 Speaker 23: get closer to Highway 6. We
00:37:45 Speaker 23: have had some stormwater issues in
00:37:49 Speaker 23: the past there, so I think
00:37:50 Speaker 23: it is in collabouration with this
00:37:52 Speaker 23: type of project of what that's
00:37:53 Speaker 06: going to add to it. So
00:37:57 Speaker 06: that's being addressed. Certainly going forward.
00:38:00 Speaker 06: Yeah, it won't be tomorrow, but
00:38:03 Speaker 06: it will start in 2026. Okay,
00:38:05 Speaker 06: thank you. Any further questions?
00:38:08 Speaker 06: Okay, not seen any. Then I'll
00:38:10 Speaker 06: call the question. All those in
00:38:12 Speaker 06: favour? And that motion is carried.
00:38:15 Speaker 06: Thank you, Senior Planner. Okay. So
00:38:18 Speaker 06: next, we will move on to
00:38:20 Speaker 06: Item 7B. It's recommended that CAO.
00:38:21 Speaker 06: R C W fifteen twenty five
00:38:24 Speaker 06: regarding a court security contribution agreement
00:38:25 Speaker 06: and costing implications be received, and
00:38:28 Speaker 06: that staff be directed to fund
00:38:30 Speaker 06: the anticipated twenty twenty five budget
00:38:32 Speaker 06: shortfall from surplus realized in the
00:38:33 Speaker 06: overall corporate services budget, or if
00:38:35 Speaker 06: none exists, to be financed from
00:38:38 Speaker 06: the one time funding reserve, and
00:38:40 Speaker 06: that the warden and the clerk
00:38:43 Speaker 06: be authorised to sign the court
00:38:44 Speaker 06: security contribution agreement, and that staff.
00:38:45 Speaker 06: be directed to prepare a letter
00:38:47 Speaker 06: under the warden's signature to the
00:38:49 Speaker 06: Ministry of the Solicitor General and
00:38:54 Speaker 07: the Ministry of the Attorney General,
00:38:55 Speaker 07: advocating for additional funding to support
00:38:58 Speaker 07: municipalities adhering to the security directives
00:38:59 Speaker 07: required by the province. May I
00:39:01 Speaker 07: ask for a mover and a
00:39:03 Speaker 07: seconder? Moved by Councillor De Braine,
00:39:05 Speaker 07: seconded by Councillor Body. It's now
00:39:08 Speaker 07: on the floor for discussion. Welcome,
00:39:11 Speaker 07: CAO Schertzler. Thank you, Warden Matrissaus,
00:39:12 Speaker 07: and good morning, County Council. So
00:39:16 Speaker 07: the purpose of this report is
00:39:18 Speaker 07: to provide council with an update
00:39:20 Speaker 07: on the court security contribution agreement,
00:39:22 Speaker 07: as directed by county council back
00:39:25 Speaker 07: in July of 2024. This agreement
00:39:28 Speaker 07: was developed to address the funding
00:39:30 Speaker 07: gap between the City of Buenos
00:39:32 Speaker 07: Aires' actual court security costs, which
00:39:33 Speaker 07: are called the court security and
00:39:36 Speaker 07: prisoner transportation costs, and the provincial
00:39:37 Speaker 07: CSPT grant. So, what the difference
00:39:41 Speaker 07: between what the province funds and
00:39:43 Speaker 07: what the actual costs actually are.
00:39:46 Speaker 07: the goal of of the
00:39:48 Speaker 07: previous direction that was provided council
00:39:51 Speaker 07: back in July twenty twenty four
00:39:52 Speaker 07: was to ensure the city is
00:39:54 Speaker 07: not unfairly burdened with costs for
00:39:56 Speaker 07: a service that benefits the entire
00:39:59 Speaker 07: region. Under the Community Safety and
00:40:01 Speaker 07: Policing Act twenty eighteen, municipalities are
00:40:04 Speaker 07: mandated to provide court security and
00:40:07 Speaker 07: prisoner transportation services through their local
00:40:11 Speaker 07: police services. The CSBT grant from
00:40:12 Speaker 07: the province is intended to support
00:40:16 Speaker 07: these services, but it's based
00:40:18 Speaker 07: on. expenses from two years prior.
00:40:19 Speaker 07: Typically, it's calculated as a proportionate
00:40:22 Speaker 07: share of a fixed provincial funding
00:40:25 Speaker 07: pool, and this model often results
00:40:26 Speaker 07: in in underfunding, as it does
00:40:28 Speaker 07: not reflect current costs or or
00:40:30 Speaker 07: what's what's actually happening on the
00:40:32 Speaker 07: ground from a security cost perspective.
00:40:33 Speaker 07: The court security costs contribution agreement
00:40:36 Speaker 07: allows Grey County to fund the
00:40:39 Speaker 07: difference between own sounds net CSPT
00:40:40 Speaker 07: costs and the provincial grant. So
00:40:42 Speaker 07: some of the key terms in
00:40:45 Speaker 07: the agreement is that the city
00:40:46 Speaker 07: is to submit an annual financial
00:40:48 Speaker 07: report to the county by April
00:40:53 Speaker 07: 30th of each year. The county
00:40:58 Speaker 07: will verify that report and provide
00:40:59 Speaker 07: funding within 60 days of council
00:41:02 Speaker 07: direction. The agreement renews annually and
00:41:05 Speaker 07: can be terminated if a new
00:41:07 Speaker 07: agreement is enacted with the province.
00:41:10 Speaker 07: and And the city would be
00:41:13 Speaker 07: responsible for notifying the county of
00:41:17 Speaker 07: any overpayments. in In 2024. the
00:41:19 Speaker 07: anticipated CSPT overage was approximately $250,000,
00:41:21 Speaker 07: and that was what was included
00:41:23 Speaker 07: in the 2025 budget. The actual
00:41:27 Speaker 07: shortfall, as reported in the 2024
00:41:30 Speaker 07: annual financial report, is just under
00:41:32 Speaker 07: $370,000. So this results in a
00:41:35 Speaker 07: budget overage of just under $120,000
00:41:37 Speaker 07: for 2025. Staff recommend funding this
00:41:39 Speaker 07: this overage from any surplus that's
00:41:41 Speaker 07: realized in the corporate services budget.
00:41:43 Speaker 07: or the one-time funding reserve, if
00:41:46 Speaker 07: there's no surplus that's available. Based
00:41:47 Speaker 07: on, we've had obviously lots of
00:41:49 Speaker 07: discussions with with Onsound Police Services
00:41:52 Speaker 07: and city staff about about why
00:41:55 Speaker 07: there's some overages, and and I'll
00:41:58 Speaker 07: just note that even the 2024
00:42:00 Speaker 07: report we noted that there's fluctuations
00:42:04 Speaker 07: that can happen with court security
00:42:07 Speaker 07: costs, and and last year being
00:42:10 Speaker 07: one of those years. Based on
00:42:12 Speaker 07: Onsound Police Services, they noted the
00:42:14 Speaker 07: the rationale for some. of those
00:42:16 Speaker 07: cost increases last year was hybrid
00:42:18 Speaker 07: court operations still require in-person bail
00:42:20 Speaker 07: hearings. There was four new part-time
00:42:24 Speaker 07: special constables began training in December
00:42:27 Speaker 07: 24, increasing staffing costs. Prisoner transports
00:42:28 Speaker 07: increased by 265 percent from 2023
00:42:31 Speaker 07: to 2024. There was a
00:42:34 Speaker 07: court backlog from COVID that they
00:42:38 Speaker 07: were still dealing with, and has
00:42:40 Speaker 07: led to more cases and longer
00:42:43 Speaker 07: trials. And they noted there's been
00:42:44 Speaker 07: violent crime and homicide cases have
00:42:46 Speaker 07: increased, requiring dedicated security personnel. They
00:42:49 Speaker 07: also noted virtual hearings have
00:42:51 Speaker 07: declined, leading to more in-person appearances
00:42:54 Speaker 07: and higher resource demands. And bail
00:42:56 Speaker 07: hearings now require in-person attendance for
00:42:58 Speaker 07: consolidation purposes. In terms of, we
00:43:01 Speaker 07: also outline in the report that
00:43:03 Speaker 07: there's been new provincial security
00:43:07 Speaker 07: directives. So we wanted to flag
00:43:10 Speaker 07: this for council that on August
00:43:11 Speaker 07: 11, 2023. That on August
00:43:15 Speaker 07: 11, 2025, the Ministry of the
00:43:18 Speaker 07: Solicitor General implemented new security directives.
00:43:21 Speaker 07: Single public entrance for all court
00:43:23 Speaker 07: premises were part of those directives.
00:43:25 Speaker 07: Mandatory screening with metal detectors or
00:43:26 Speaker 07: wands, and that an armed officer
00:43:28 Speaker 07: be present on every floor of
00:43:31 Speaker 07: court facilities. Oceansound Police Services began
00:43:33 Speaker 07: implementing these measures at the the
00:43:34 Speaker 07: POA Court in the Gray County
00:43:36 Speaker 07: Administration Building. Increase which will result
00:43:38 Speaker 07: in increasing staffing and costs. We
00:43:40 Speaker 07: are clarifying with Solgen regarding these
00:43:43 Speaker 07: new directives. So there's still some
00:43:45 Speaker 07: further discussions that we have to
00:43:48 Speaker 07: have with Solgen regarding this, and
00:43:49 Speaker 07: and try to better understand what
00:43:52 Speaker 07: those costs will be with respect
00:43:54 Speaker 07: to these new security directives. So
00:43:57 Speaker 07: we'll be bringing back further information
00:43:59 Speaker 07: as part of the budget process
00:44:01 Speaker 07: once we've clarified that that information.
00:44:04 Speaker 07: We just wanted to flag that
00:44:06 Speaker 07: for this particular report. These new
00:44:07 Speaker 07: directives will likely result in further
00:44:10 Speaker 07: cost increases in 2026 and beyond.
00:44:12 Speaker 07: The impact will be greater if
00:44:15 Speaker 07: the directives do apply fully to
00:44:16 Speaker 07: provincial fence courts, in addition to
00:44:18 Speaker 07: superior and interior courts. So, as
00:44:20 Speaker 07: noted, staff will continue working with
00:44:24 Speaker 07: OSPS, OPP, and Solgen to assess
00:44:25 Speaker 07: the financial impact and to clarify
00:44:27 Speaker 07: these new directives, and will update
00:44:30 Speaker 07: council during the budget process once
00:44:32 Speaker 07: we have further information. Based on
00:44:34 Speaker 07: those new directives, however, staff. recommend
00:44:36 Speaker 07: that correspondence be sent to Solgen
00:44:38 Speaker 07: and the Ministry of Attorney General,
00:44:40 Speaker 07: requesting that all additional court security
00:44:42 Speaker 07: costs resulting from the new directives
00:44:44 Speaker 07: be fully funded by the province.
00:44:45 Speaker 07: So the recommendation is that this
00:44:47 Speaker 07: report be received, that staff be
00:44:50 Speaker 07: directed to fund the anticipated
00:44:52 Speaker 07: 2025 budget shortfall from surplus realized
00:44:54 Speaker 07: in the overall corporate services budget,
00:44:58 Speaker 21: or if none exists, be financed
00:44:59 Speaker 21: from one-time funding. The warden clerk
00:45:00 Speaker 21: be authorised to sign the court
00:45:05 Speaker 21: security contribution agreement. that was agreed
00:45:07 Speaker 21: to previously by council back last
00:45:10 Speaker 20: year, and that staff be directed
00:45:13 Speaker 20: to prepare a letter under the
00:45:16 Speaker 20: warden's signature to Solgen and Meg,
00:45:19 Speaker 20: advocating for additional provincial funding to
00:45:22 Speaker 20: support Mississauga's base on the new
00:45:25 Speaker 20: security directives. Happy to take any
00:45:29 Speaker 20: questions. Okay, thank you very much.
00:45:31 Speaker 20: We'll put it out then to
00:45:34 Speaker 20: County Council, being under Councillor Dobrin.
00:45:36 Speaker 20: Thank you, Warden, and through you
00:45:39 Speaker 20: to the CAO. CEO, I just
00:45:41 Speaker 20: wanted to say I absolutely support
00:45:43 Speaker 20: the recommendation, and with the AMO
00:45:46 Speaker 20: board meeting tomorrow and or tonight
00:45:49 Speaker 01: and tomorrow, we will be discussing
00:45:51 Speaker 01: this as well. And would encourage
00:45:53 Speaker 01: that letter be copied to AMO.
00:45:55 Speaker 01: I'm confident that my Roma Caucus
00:45:56 Speaker 01: colleague across the horseshoe, Councillor Nielsen,
00:45:57 Speaker 01: and I will raise this at
00:46:02 Speaker 01: our caucus as a concern. and
00:46:03 Speaker 01: the the figures that you are
00:46:05 Speaker 01: outlining are very helpful. So thank
00:46:07 Speaker 01: you for that. the The timing
00:46:08 Speaker 01: is perfect. Why not? And thank
00:46:14 Speaker 01: you to Councillor Dobrine and to
00:46:17 Speaker 01: Councillor Nielsen and Councillor McKay as
00:46:21 Speaker 01: well. When he's sitting with Good
00:46:23 Speaker 01: Roads to to share those voices
00:46:26 Speaker 01: and be part of that discussion.
00:46:27 Speaker 01: So thank you. That's very helpful.
00:46:29 Speaker 01: Any other questions? Okay. I don't
00:46:32 Speaker 01: see any further questions. Then I'll
00:46:34 Speaker 01: call the question. All those in
00:46:38 Speaker 01: favour? And that motion is carried.
00:46:40 Speaker 01: Thank you very much. See you.
00:46:42 Speaker 01: So next, we'll move on to
00:46:44 Speaker 01: item seven C. It's recommended that
00:46:49 Speaker 01: report LTCRCW nineteen twenty five capital
00:46:51 Speaker 01: funding programme and ministry survey be
00:46:53 Speaker 01: received, and that staff be directed
00:46:56 Speaker 01: to complete the ministry of long
00:46:58 Speaker 01: term care survey by September twenty
00:47:00 Speaker 01: ninth, twenty twenty five, indicating Gray
00:47:02 Speaker 01: County's readiness to potentially. develop the
00:47:04 Speaker 01: approved 62 long-term long-term care beds
00:47:07 Speaker 01: at Gray Gables, and that action
00:47:10 Speaker 01: be taken prior to County
00:47:12 Speaker 01: Council approval as per Section 26.6B
00:47:13 Speaker 01: of the procedural bylaw, and that
00:47:15 Speaker 01: staff be directed to undertake
00:47:17 Speaker 01: updated cost forecasts and any other
00:47:18 Speaker 01: applicable studies for the potential development
00:47:23 Speaker 01: of 128 bed new home at
00:47:25 Speaker 01: Gray Gables to be funded from
00:47:29 Speaker 01: the one-time funding reserve, and that
00:47:30 Speaker 29: staff be directed to bring forward
00:47:33 Speaker 29: a report before March twenty-six outlining
00:47:35 Speaker 29: the updated budget impacts and a
00:47:37 Speaker 29: draft development agreement for council's consideration.
00:47:39 Speaker 29: May I ask for a mover
00:47:42 Speaker 29: and a seconder? Moved by Councillor
00:47:46 Speaker 29: Nielsen, seconded by Councillor Carlson. It's
00:47:48 Speaker 29: now on the floor for discussion.
00:47:49 Speaker 29: Welcome, Director Cornell. Thank you very
00:47:52 Speaker 29: much, Warden Matrousovs. Good morning, County
00:47:54 Speaker 29: Council. As the warden has indicated,
00:47:57 Speaker 29: I'm in front of council today.
00:47:59 Speaker 29: to present this report to discuss
00:48:01 Speaker 29: to discuss the Ministry of Long
00:48:04 Speaker 29: Term Care's capital funding programme and
00:48:07 Speaker 29: their recent request for operators to
00:48:09 Speaker 29: complete a redevelopment readiness survey. And
00:48:11 Speaker 29: so I'm going to go over
00:48:14 Speaker 29: some of the background. There's been
00:48:17 Speaker 29: a lot of moving parts on
00:48:20 Speaker 29: this topic over the past number
00:48:23 Speaker 29: of years. So in 2019, Grey
00:48:25 Speaker 29: County submitted applications to the Ministry
00:48:28 Speaker 29: of Long Term Care for two
00:48:32 Speaker 29: major Long-term care for two major
00:48:33 Speaker 29: long-term care projects: the Rockwood Terrace
00:48:34 Speaker 29: redevelopment and expansion to a new
00:48:37 Speaker 29: 128-bed facility, and Grey Gables redevelopment
00:48:39 Speaker 29: from a 66-bed Class A facility
00:48:41 Speaker 29: to a new 128-bed home on
00:48:44 Speaker 29: the same property, with the existing
00:48:46 Speaker 29: building repurposed as an assisted living
00:48:48 Speaker 29: retirement home. Both applications were approved,
00:48:54 Speaker 29: and the province allocated 62
00:48:56 Speaker 29: new beds to Grey Gables. That's
00:48:59 Speaker 29: 128 total beds. minus the 66
00:49:02 Speaker 29: existing. Staff have confirmed that the
00:49:04 Speaker 29: new beds are intended to be
00:49:07 Speaker 29: part of a new standalone facility
00:49:10 Speaker 29: and not an extension of the
00:49:12 Speaker 29: current building. Due to the scale
00:49:15 Speaker 29: of both projects, council prioritized Rockwood
00:49:17 Speaker 29: Terrace, which is now under construction
00:49:20 Speaker 29: and represents Gray County's largest capital
00:49:22 Speaker 29: project to date at $96 million.
00:49:25 Speaker 29: On February 23, 2023, council deferred
00:49:27 Speaker 29: a motion regarding Graygate. Motion regarding
00:49:30 Speaker 29: Grey Gables pending completion of the
00:49:32 Speaker 29: Rockwood Terrace tender process, with construction
00:49:34 Speaker 29: now 25% complete. There's an opportunity
00:49:38 Speaker 29: to reassess the financial feasibility of
00:49:40 Speaker 29: the Grey Gables redevelopment. So, looking
00:49:42 Speaker 29: at the capital funding programme and
00:49:44 Speaker 29: specifically around the ministry survey, the
00:49:47 Speaker 29: new capital funding programme offers up
00:49:50 Speaker 29: to 85% funding for new beds
00:49:52 Speaker 29: on a maximum per bed cost
00:49:55 Speaker 29: of $436,000. I just want to
00:49:57 Speaker 29: note. that Rockwood Terrace is not
00:50:00 Speaker 29: eligible for reconsideration under this
00:50:02 Speaker 29: programme. That was part of our
00:50:06 Speaker 29: delegation at AMO, and we've spent
00:50:09 Speaker 29: some time confirming that that is
00:50:11 Speaker 29: the case. The province has committed
00:50:13 Speaker 29: to adding thirty thousand new long-term
00:50:16 Speaker 29: care beds, and this construction funding
00:50:20 Speaker 29: programme is designed to support that
00:50:22 Speaker 29: mandate. In late August, twenty twenty-five,
00:50:24 Speaker 29: the ministry released a survey
00:50:26 Speaker 29: to assess which operators with previous
00:50:30 Speaker 29: Operators with previously previously approved but
00:50:33 Speaker 29: unbuilt beds can proceed in a
00:50:35 Speaker 29: timely manner. The survey outlines the
00:50:37 Speaker 29: following development timeline. The survey response
00:50:40 Speaker 29: deadline is September 29th. Executed executed
00:50:44 Speaker 29: development agreement needs to be in
00:50:47 Speaker 29: place by March of 2026, with
00:50:49 Speaker 29: a construction start deadline no later
00:50:51 Speaker 29: than March of 2028. Gray Gables
00:50:54 Speaker 29: existing 66 Class A beds meet
00:50:57 Speaker 29: the current design standards and are.
00:51:02 Speaker 29: therefore not eligible for the redevelopment
00:51:04 Speaker 29: funding under the construction funding programme.
00:51:06 Speaker 29: The 62 new beds are eligible
00:51:08 Speaker 29: for the CFP funding. Funding
00:51:11 Speaker 29: for the existing beds will need
00:51:15 Speaker 29: to be sourced through alternate mechanisms.
00:51:19 Speaker 29: The ministry survey presents three options.
00:51:21 Speaker 29: Option one: proceed with development planning,
00:51:23 Speaker 29: which would mean the counties opting
00:51:25 Speaker 29: to maintain the 62 bed allocation,
00:51:28 Speaker 29: and council would be. directing staff
00:51:32 Speaker 29: to explore redevelopment options, so updating
00:51:34 Speaker 29: cost estimates, concept designs, site analysis,
00:51:38 Speaker 29: and initial funding may be sourced
00:51:39 Speaker 29: from long-term care reserves or surplus
00:51:42 Speaker 29: to do that work. And this
00:51:44 Speaker 29: positions Gray County to meet ministry
00:51:46 Speaker 29: timelines and secure construction funding, that
00:51:48 Speaker 29: the CFP funding. Option two is
00:51:50 Speaker 29: to withdraw from redevelopment. That. would
00:51:54 Speaker 29: mean releasing the 62 bed allocation
00:51:55 Speaker 29: back to the province, and it
00:51:58 Speaker 29: forfeits future funding and development opportunities
00:52:00 Speaker 29: at Grey Gables under this CFP
00:52:02 Speaker 29: programme. Option three is to defer
00:52:05 Speaker 29: the decision until the Rockwood completion.
00:52:07 Speaker 29: This would mean requesting the ministry
00:52:10 Speaker 29: to maintain the 62 bed allocation
00:52:12 Speaker 29: and provide further information in 2027.
00:52:16 Speaker 29: I do want to note for
00:52:19 Speaker 29: council the risk here is that
00:52:21 Speaker 29: the ministry may rescind. the allocation
00:52:25 Speaker 29: due to a lack of commitment?
00:52:27 Speaker 29: Staff recommend option one to proceed
00:52:28 Speaker 29: with the development planning and submit
00:52:33 Speaker 29: a survey response confirming Grey County's
00:52:36 Speaker 29: intent to execute a development agreement
00:52:38 Speaker 29: with the province by March of
00:52:40 Speaker 29: 2026. This agreement would support the
00:52:42 Speaker 29: potential construction of a new 128-bed
00:52:45 Speaker 29: home at Grey Gables with construction
00:52:47 Speaker 29: beginning no later than March 2028.
00:52:50 Speaker 29: To support this approach, staff. will
00:52:55 Speaker 29: engage external consultants to review existing
00:52:57 Speaker 29: project plans and perform any applicable
00:53:00 Speaker 29: studies and site analysis to update
00:53:04 Speaker 29: the cost estimates. Those cost estimates
00:53:05 Speaker 29: that we have in place are
00:53:08 Speaker 29: from 2018-2019. A revised cost estimate
00:53:10 Speaker 29: and draft development agreement will be
00:53:12 Speaker 29: brought to council for review and
00:53:14 Speaker 29: approval prior to submission to the
00:53:16 Speaker 29: ministry. And upon confirmation of provincial
00:53:20 Speaker 29: funding, staff will initiate. detailed planning
00:53:22 Speaker 29: and design phases throughout 2026, followed
00:53:25 Speaker 29: by a procurement process in 2027
00:53:28 Speaker 29: and groundbreaking in 2028. In looking
00:53:31 Speaker 29: at the financial and resource implications,
00:53:34 Speaker 29: want to flag a number of
00:53:37 Speaker 29: areas. Significant additional work will be
00:53:40 Speaker 29: required should council support the staff
00:53:42 Speaker 29: recommendation to bring forward updated cost
00:53:44 Speaker 29: estimates and to complete the applicable
00:53:48 Speaker 29: studies and site analysis. It's recommended
00:53:50 Speaker 29: that. any cost to complete this
00:53:55 Speaker 29: work be funded from one-time funding.
00:53:57 Speaker 29: In 2019, the estimated cost for
00:54:01 Speaker 29: the project was approximately $37 million,
00:54:05 Speaker 29: based on a per-bed cost of
00:54:08 Speaker 29: $280,000 from a recent comparable build.
00:54:11 Speaker 29: Rockwood Terrace, our new 128-bed facility
00:54:14 Speaker 29: and a direct comparator, was procured
00:54:18 Speaker 29: in 2023-2024 at a total project
00:54:21 Speaker 29: value of $96 million, equating to
00:54:26 Speaker 29: a per-bed cost. Equating to a
00:54:28 Speaker 29: per bed cost on the overall
00:54:30 Speaker 29: project costs of approximately $750,000 per
00:54:32 Speaker 29: bed, an almost 170% increase in
00:54:35 Speaker 29: price from the 2020-19 comparable.
00:54:37 Speaker 29: Under the new capital funding programme,
00:54:39 Speaker 29: the province may contribute up to
00:54:42 Speaker 29: $376,000 per bed, which is 85%
00:54:45 Speaker 29: of the grant cap. In addition,
00:54:49 Speaker 29: the county qualifies for up to
00:54:51 Speaker 29: $500,000 of additional. Thousand dollars of
00:54:54 Speaker 29: additional funding to support design costs,
00:54:56 Speaker 29: which is a new funding opportunity
00:54:59 Speaker 29: for municipal and not-for-profit operators. In
00:55:00 Speaker 29: that's a feature of this construction
00:55:03 Speaker 29: funding programme. Based on Rockwood, it's
00:55:05 Speaker 29: anticipated that costs will exceed the
00:55:06 Speaker 29: provincial cap, and so the county
00:55:09 Speaker 29: might anticipate a full provincial grant
00:55:12 Speaker 29: of approximately twenty-three million four hundred
00:55:14 Speaker 29: seventy-seven thousand. Based on the Rockwood
00:55:15 Speaker 29: cost of 96 million, this would
00:55:18 Speaker 29: leave a balance of approximately 72
00:55:19 Speaker 29: million 522 thousand 800. In percentage
00:55:22 Speaker 29: terms, based on these assumptions, the
00:55:24 Speaker 29: total provincial grant would be approximately
00:55:26 Speaker 29: 24% of the total cost. It's
00:55:28 Speaker 29: noted that these costs are high-level
00:55:30 Speaker 29: estimates based on Rockwood Terrace and
00:55:32 Speaker 29: do not account for inflationary pressures
00:55:35 Speaker 29: between the time of report and
00:55:37 Speaker 29: tender. One of the key next
00:55:39 Speaker 29: steps, if Council's Key next steps,
00:55:41 Speaker 29: if council supports the staff recommendation,
00:55:43 Speaker 29: is to refine these cost estimates.
00:55:46 Speaker 29: Assuming a similar approach to Rockwood
00:55:48 Speaker 29: was taken, and that the balance
00:55:50 Speaker 29: of funds was funded through debenture,
00:55:53 Speaker 29: this would add to the county's
00:55:54 Speaker 29: long-term debt. The amount of debt
00:55:57 Speaker 29: a municipality can carry is subject
00:56:00 Speaker 29: to maximum limits that are established
00:56:03 Speaker 29: by the province, and the annual
00:56:07 Speaker 29: payments to service debts may not
00:56:11 Speaker 29: exceed twenty-five percent of the municipality's
00:56:13 Speaker 29: own source revenue. This is known
00:56:14 Speaker 29: as the annual. repayment limit, or
00:56:17 Speaker 29: ARL. Gray County has established a
00:56:17 Speaker 29: policy to limit the ARL to
00:56:21 Speaker 29: 10% or less. Based on the
00:56:24 Speaker 29: above figures and other commitments, staff
00:56:25 Speaker 29: anticipate that there is capacity to
00:56:27 Speaker 29: assume this magnitude of debt within
00:56:29 Speaker 29: that 25% provincial limit, but that
00:56:32 Speaker 29: this would incur a period where
00:56:34 Speaker 29: the ARL to meet debt repayments
00:56:37 Speaker 29: exceeds the county target of
00:56:39 Speaker 29: 10% or less. In your package,
00:56:42 Speaker 29: there is. a concept plan drawing
00:56:45 Speaker 29: of the the proposed build that
00:56:50 Speaker 29: was included in the original proposal
00:56:53 Speaker 29: submitted to the Ministry of Long
00:56:55 Speaker 29: Term Care in 2019, and I
00:56:58 Speaker 29: know that was a lot. And
00:57:00 Speaker 29: I just like to summarise some
00:57:03 Speaker 29: of the key points. This report
00:57:06 Speaker 29: does not commit Bracken County to
00:57:09 Speaker 29: building at this time. What it
00:57:12 Speaker 29: does is position us to respond
00:57:14 Speaker 29: to the ministry's request for readiness
00:57:18 Speaker 29: and to begin the. necessary due
00:57:20 Speaker 29: diligence required to work on this
00:57:22 Speaker 29: project, the financial forecasting, the feasibility
00:57:26 Speaker 29: studies, planning work, all of that
00:57:27 Speaker 30: information to inform a future decision.
00:57:29 Speaker 30: So, if if council directs and
00:57:30 Speaker 30: approves the recommendation presented, the next
00:57:34 Speaker 30: steps for staff would be to
00:57:38 Speaker 30: undertake that work, to update those
00:57:40 Speaker 30: cost forecasts and any other applicable
00:57:42 Speaker 26: studies. prepare that a follow-up report
00:57:44 Speaker 26: that would come to County Council
00:57:45 Speaker 26: well before March of 2026. That
00:57:49 Speaker 26: would include that updated budget information
00:57:52 Speaker 26: and a draft development agreement for
00:57:54 Speaker 26: Council's consideration. And so that I
00:57:55 Speaker 26: will leave it at that and
00:57:56 Speaker 26: hand it back to you, Warna
00:57:58 Speaker 26: Matrosovs, for questions. Thank you very
00:58:00 Speaker 26: much, Director Cornell. So we'll put
00:58:02 Speaker 26: it out to Council Committee of
00:58:03 Speaker 26: the Whole members if they. Committee,
00:58:04 Speaker 26: the whole members, if they have
00:58:07 Speaker 26: any questions. Okay, we'll begin with
00:58:09 Speaker 26: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very
00:58:11 Speaker 26: much, Ward Matrussoff, and I'll add
00:58:14 Speaker 26: more of a comment than a
00:58:17 Speaker 26: question. Yesterday, County Council had its
00:58:20 Speaker 26: Budget and Finance Committee meeting, and
00:58:23 Speaker 26: during that conversation, we talked about
00:58:25 Speaker 26: operational efficiencies. This report today shows
00:58:26 Speaker 26: an idea of how we can
00:58:28 Speaker 26: move forward with Great Gables, and
00:58:31 Speaker 26: I think there's two options before
00:58:34 Speaker 26: Great County. The conversation. about whether
00:58:35 Speaker 26: or not Gray County wants to
00:58:37 Speaker 26: have three is ended. The conversation
00:58:38 Speaker 26: about what type of home we're
00:58:41 Speaker 26: going to have at the Gray
00:58:42 Speaker 26: Gables site is what's before us.
00:58:45 Speaker 26: To move to a 128-bed facility
00:58:47 Speaker 26: is a significant difference in operational
00:58:48 Speaker 26: efficiencies that's presented by the data
00:58:49 Speaker 26: coming from the Manor, from Rockwood
00:58:56 Speaker 26: Terrace, and is before long-term care
00:58:59 Speaker 26: community management. The difference is the
00:59:02 Speaker 31: Gray Gables bed as a home
00:59:05 Speaker 31: as it stands now may not
00:59:08 Speaker 31: be. operationally efficient, but it is
00:59:10 Speaker 31: a desirable living facility for the
00:59:15 Speaker 29: residents of that site. And so,
00:59:17 Speaker 29: I don't think there's a wrong
00:59:20 Speaker 29: answer here for Gray County in
00:59:22 Speaker 29: terms of whether we move towards
00:59:24 Speaker 29: a new facility, but as to
00:59:26 Speaker 29: just a decision as to do
00:59:30 Speaker 29: we go for operational efficiencies or
00:59:32 Speaker 29: lifestyle for the residents that exist.
00:59:37 Speaker 29: And so, just more of a
00:59:40 Speaker 29: comment as to what we're doing
00:59:42 Speaker 29: here. Okay, thank you. Look around.
00:59:44 Speaker 29: We'll go to Council Carleton. Thank
00:59:47 Speaker 29: you, Warden. Just a question about
00:59:55 Speaker 32: what the waitlist status is there.
00:59:57 Speaker 32: What's the potential for filling that
01:00:01 Speaker 32: home if we go ahead with
01:00:02 Speaker 32: the build there? Thank you for
01:00:04 Speaker 32: that question, and through you, Madam
01:00:08 Speaker 32: Chair, I did have those waitlist
01:00:11 Speaker 32: numbers handy for the Town of
01:00:14 Speaker 32: the Mountains seniors. The Town of
01:00:19 Speaker 32: Blue Mountain Senior's Fair last week,
01:00:21 Speaker 32: but that was so last week.
01:00:23 Speaker 32: But I can confidently say that
01:00:26 Speaker 32: the wait lists are lengthy; that
01:00:30 Speaker 32: people are waiting three months to
01:00:33 Speaker 32: more than a year to be
01:00:38 Speaker 32: able to move into one of
01:00:42 Speaker 32: the Grey County homes. And I
01:00:44 Speaker 32: don't foresee an issue in terms
01:00:47 Speaker 32: of occupancy at 128 beds. Okay,
01:00:49 Speaker 32: thank you, and we'll go to
01:00:51 Speaker 32: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, Warden, and
01:00:51 Speaker 32: through you. Thank you for the
01:00:54 Speaker 32: report. It was very easy to
01:00:56 Speaker 32: follow. Guess my question, just for
01:00:59 Speaker 32: myself, or for anyone listening, is
01:01:03 Speaker 32: that we're prohibited from adding on
01:01:05 Speaker 32: to the existing 66 beds to
01:01:10 Speaker 32: make it 128 beds. We can
01:01:19 Speaker 29: add on 128 a new new
01:01:21 Speaker 29: facility and create an assisted living
01:01:25 Speaker 29: facility. But there's no funding for
01:01:30 Speaker 29: the requirement to blend the two
01:01:34 Speaker 29: homes or the the beds. We
01:01:39 Speaker 29: can't. So the province is saying
01:01:43 Speaker 29: you if you're going to have
01:01:46 Speaker 29: 128 bed facility, you can't add
01:01:50 Speaker 29: on to your existing beds. You
01:01:53 Speaker 29: have to create a new facility.
01:01:56 Speaker 29: But we're not going to give
01:01:57 Speaker 29: you funding for the conversion of
01:02:01 Speaker 29: the 66 beds to the new
01:02:02 Speaker 29: facility. That's my part one. And
01:02:05 Speaker 29: my other question then: Do you
01:02:07 Speaker 29: anticipate that the assisted, the converted
01:02:08 Speaker 29: facility to assisted living, would help
01:02:11 Speaker 29: significantly offset those costs? Great, thank
01:02:15 Speaker 29: you for those questions and through
01:02:18 Speaker 29: you, Warden. So the intern, we'll
01:02:21 Speaker 29: start with part one regarding the
01:02:23 Speaker 29: the blending of the funding and
01:02:27 Speaker 29: the opportunity to add on. So
01:02:29 Speaker 29: staff's understanding is that this is
01:02:32 Speaker 29: a readiness evaluation based on proposals
01:02:33 Speaker 29: that were. submitted in 2019, and
01:02:35 Speaker 29: so the the we did reach
01:02:39 Speaker 29: out in the past number of
01:02:42 Speaker 29: years, I think, to look at
01:02:43 Speaker 29: what the options were, and the
01:02:49 Speaker 29: ministry response was that we need
01:02:50 Speaker 29: to stay true to the proposal
01:02:53 Speaker 29: that was submitted. If there is
01:02:55 Speaker 29: an interest to do something different,
01:03:00 Speaker 29: it would be a separate application
01:03:02 Speaker 29: under the construction funding programme. So
01:03:04 Speaker 29: it it we're. not prohibited from
01:03:05 Speaker 29: adding on. It would mean starting
01:03:09 Speaker 29: at the application process with a
01:03:10 Speaker 29: new application. We have guaranteed these
01:03:13 Speaker 29: 62 beds are they've been approved
01:03:17 Speaker 29: by the province, guaranteed in that
01:03:20 Speaker 29: the the proposal was approved. Pending
01:03:22 Speaker 29: we meet all of these milestones
01:03:25 Speaker 29: steps, it will meet the criteria
01:03:28 Speaker 29: for the the funding. And that
01:03:31 Speaker 29: is all my understanding in support
01:03:34 Speaker 29: of the mandate of 30. Of
01:03:36 Speaker 29: the mandate of thirty thousand new
01:03:38 Speaker 29: beds, so that CAO chair, sir,
01:03:40 Speaker 29: did you have anything to add?
01:03:45 Speaker 29: No, okay. And so, moving to
01:03:47 Speaker 29: the second question around the assisted
01:03:49 Speaker 29: living, offsetting the the costs, what
01:03:54 Speaker 29: we know to this that is
01:03:55 Speaker 29: something that we would be wanting
01:03:56 Speaker 29: to look into and get new
01:04:01 Speaker 29: numbers, new information in that report
01:04:04 Speaker 33: that would come before March of
01:04:10 Speaker 33: twenty twenty six. March of 2026.
01:04:11 Speaker 33: What I can say from historical
01:04:16 Speaker 33: research on that, when we were
01:04:18 Speaker 33: working through that option for the
01:04:21 Speaker 33: Rockwood Terrace redevelopment that did include
01:04:26 Speaker 33: a assisted living portion originally as
01:04:29 Speaker 33: part of that campus, we were
01:04:31 Speaker 33: able to have it break even,
01:04:32 Speaker 33: to not impact the levy and
01:04:35 Speaker 33: cost additional money, but we weren't
01:04:38 Speaker 33: able to have it generate a
01:04:40 Speaker 33: revenue based on our operating. Based
01:04:42 Speaker 33: on our operations, are there other
01:04:44 Speaker 33: opportunities, perhaps? But that's the information
01:04:47 Speaker 33: that I can share today, based
01:04:49 Speaker 33: on the research that we did.
01:04:50 Speaker 33: Okay, thank you, and we'll go
01:04:53 Speaker 33: to Councillor Key. Oh, sorry, Councillor
01:04:58 Speaker 34: McKay first, and then to Councillor
01:05:03 Speaker 34: Keaveny. Yes, Warden, through you, we
01:05:04 Speaker 34: had a tour of Rockwood, Rockwood
01:05:07 Speaker 14: Terrace yesterday. Today, it's going to
01:05:10 Speaker 14: hold a lot of people at
01:05:12 Speaker 14: one time. We don't know when
01:05:14 Speaker 14: that place will be full, and
01:05:16 Speaker 14: it's very hard to estimate. Like
01:05:20 Speaker 14: I sway towards option three, just
01:05:22 Speaker 14: to the fact that we're going
01:05:23 Speaker 14: to be in debt for a
01:05:27 Speaker 14: while with Rockwood tariffs. Do you
01:05:28 Speaker 14: want to go further in depth?
01:05:30 Speaker 14: we know. Then we know every
01:05:33 Speaker 14: year when we set a budget,
01:05:34 Speaker 14: there'll be so much money put
01:05:35 Speaker 14: towards Rockwood Terrace because it's long
01:05:36 Speaker 14: term. Now, if we're going to
01:05:38 Speaker 14: do Markdale, it'll be the same
01:05:40 Speaker 14: thing. So right off the bat,
01:05:45 Speaker 14: on your budget, you're going to
01:05:47 Speaker 14: be paying debt. Thank you. Okay,
01:05:49 Speaker 29: thank you for that comment. So
01:05:50 Speaker 29: we'll go over to Councillor Keaveny.
01:05:51 Speaker 29: Go over to Councillor Kivney. Thank
01:05:53 Speaker 29: you, Warden Matrasovs. I'm also worried
01:05:55 Speaker 29: about the debt, so I just
01:05:57 Speaker 29: wanted to confirm first of all,
01:06:03 Speaker 29: if I may, Director Cornell. So
01:06:04 Speaker 29: completing this survey does not commit
01:06:06 Speaker 29: future councils to the rebuilding of
01:06:08 Speaker 29: Gregables. At this point, it would
01:06:11 Speaker 29: just provide us additional information. And
01:06:13 Speaker 29: do we know off the top
01:06:23 Speaker 07: of our heads if we did
01:06:26 Speaker 07: go forward? You mentioned that that
01:06:30 Speaker 07: would take debt capacity of more
01:06:32 Speaker 07: than. ten percent but less than
01:06:34 Speaker 07: twenty five. Do we have any
01:06:37 Speaker 07: sense if it's closer to ten
01:06:39 Speaker 07: or closer to twenty five, if
01:06:41 Speaker 07: we did go forward with the
01:06:43 Speaker 07: build? Okay, thank you. And through
01:06:44 Speaker 07: do you I I can start
01:06:47 Speaker 07: with the first one. I thought
01:06:49 Speaker 07: I would be giving someone some
01:06:50 Speaker 07: time to sort out the details
01:06:52 Speaker 07: of the second part of the
01:06:54 Speaker 07: question. Thank you. And through you,
01:06:56 Speaker 07: Warren Matrousovs. So correct this report
01:06:58 Speaker 07: does. county to building at this
01:06:59 Speaker 07: time. What it commits us to
01:07:02 Speaker 07: is responding to the survey to
01:07:03 Speaker 07: say that we are continuing to
01:07:05 Speaker 07: do our due diligence in the
01:07:08 Speaker 07: in working towards redevelopment. You, Warden,
01:07:13 Speaker 07: and just further to what Director
01:07:16 Speaker 07: Cornell indicated, it provides us with
01:07:19 Speaker 07: the opportunity as as the director.
01:07:21 Speaker 07: Just the opportunity, as as the
01:07:23 Speaker 07: director indicated, to respond to the
01:07:25 Speaker 07: survey deadline, which is fairly tight
01:07:28 Speaker 07: deadline of early next week, to
01:07:30 Speaker 07: say that we're continuing, but it
01:07:32 Speaker 07: allows us to do that further
01:07:34 Speaker 07: analysis and then bring back further
01:07:36 Speaker 07: information to this council prior to
01:07:37 Speaker 07: that March thirty first, twenty twenty
01:07:40 Speaker 07: six deadline, which is when we
01:07:41 Speaker 07: would have to enter into an
01:07:42 Speaker 07: actual development agreement with the ministry.
01:07:43 Speaker 07: So, so it gives us that
01:07:46 Speaker 07: period of time, is subject to
01:07:48 Speaker 07: obviously the direction of council today,
01:07:49 Speaker 07: and that. Today, and that's that's
01:07:52 Speaker 07: where staff are recommending option one
01:07:55 Speaker 07: to come back with that further
01:07:57 Speaker 07: analysis, so that we can provide
01:07:59 Speaker 02: that that information to council. With
01:08:12 Speaker 27: respect to the the the debt
01:08:13 Speaker 27: borrowing ratio, again, that analysis will
01:08:20 Speaker 27: determine how much we think, based
01:08:22 Speaker 27: on at least a cost a
01:08:23 Speaker 35: refined cost estimate of what that
01:08:25 Speaker 35: 128 bed facility would look like
01:08:28 Speaker 35: on the existing Gray Gable site.
01:08:29 Speaker 35: So. that's we won't know until
01:08:31 Speaker 35: we do that analysis of what
01:08:33 Speaker 35: the exact numbers will be. I
01:08:36 Speaker 35: think we could give you ballparks
01:08:38 Speaker 35: and maybe turning over to our
01:08:42 Speaker 35: finance staff or to, but it's
01:08:45 Speaker 35: it's it's tough to say at
01:08:48 Speaker 36: this stage in terms of what
01:08:52 Speaker 36: that percent will be. We just
01:08:54 Speaker 36: know that it'll be over our
01:08:58 Speaker 36: current policy threshold of ten percent
01:09:01 Speaker 36: that council has set. So that
01:09:02 Speaker 36: would have to be potentially revisited
01:09:03 Speaker 36: by council in terms of prior
01:09:06 Speaker 36: to and as part of potentially
01:09:09 Speaker 36: entering into. a development agreement in
01:09:10 Speaker 36: March 2026 next year. Oops. Okay,
01:09:12 Speaker 36: thank you. So we'll go next
01:09:17 Speaker 36: then to Councillor. Oh, sorry, Deputy
01:09:19 Speaker 36: CEO. My apologies. Information comes flowing
01:09:20 Speaker 36: in quickly when we're in meetings
01:09:22 Speaker 36: like this. So based on the
01:09:23 Speaker 36: cost. So, based on the costs
01:09:25 Speaker 36: within the report, director of finance
01:09:27 Speaker 36: has indicated it would be around
01:09:29 Speaker 36: about 13%. So, it would be
01:09:32 Speaker 36: about 3% over our policy set
01:09:35 Speaker 36: at the minute. Okay, thank you
01:09:38 Speaker 36: for sourcing that information for us,
01:09:41 Speaker 36: and we'll go to Councillor Greg.
01:09:43 Speaker 36: Thanks, Jen, for the report, and
01:09:46 Speaker 36: you know, I'm sitting here just
01:09:50 Speaker 36: entertaining everyone's comments and thoughts. Yeah,
01:09:53 Speaker 36: we did have that budget meeting
01:09:57 Speaker 36: yesterday. Of that budget meeting yesterday,
01:09:59 Speaker 36: and we went through the long-term
01:10:01 Speaker 36: capital planning, and we realized that
01:10:04 Speaker 36: while we are not at the
01:10:07 Speaker 36: bottom end of the spectrum in
01:10:10 Speaker 36: terms of investing in our
01:10:14 Speaker 36: assets and operational investment, we're not
01:10:17 Speaker 36: at the top end. We're somewhere
01:10:19 Speaker 36: in the middle. So we perform
01:10:22 Speaker 36: well with our comparators. That said,
01:10:25 Speaker 36: in the last three years locally,
01:10:27 Speaker 36: there was a new long-term care
01:10:29 Speaker 36: home built in Owen Sound, and
01:10:32 Speaker 36: this is no slight. On sound,
01:10:36 Speaker 36: and this is no slate to
01:10:39 Speaker 36: staff whatsoever. But that build, that
01:10:41 Speaker 36: private home build in On Sound,
01:10:46 Speaker 36: was effectively fifty percent the cost
01:10:47 Speaker 36: of Rockwood Terrace. And you have
01:10:50 Speaker 36: to question at what level can
01:10:54 Speaker 36: we continue to build out and
01:10:56 Speaker 36: add new assets. I have one
01:11:00 Speaker 36: line here written down, and it's
01:11:04 Speaker 36: optimizing our current assets. We know
01:11:07 Speaker 36: that Gray Gables afforded the opportunity
01:11:09 Speaker 36: to build. an extension. I do
01:11:12 Speaker 36: understand that. I mean, we we
01:11:13 Speaker 36: removed the assisted living portion of
01:11:16 Speaker 36: Rockwood Terrace because it had clamored
01:11:20 Speaker 36: up to around 125 million dollars.
01:11:23 Speaker 36: I think when we clawed it
01:11:26 Speaker 36: back, it's different when you're constructing
01:11:27 Speaker 36: new versus even entertaining, rehabilitating an
01:11:30 Speaker 36: existing footprint. So if you could
01:11:33 Speaker 36: maybe make a business case that
01:11:35 Speaker 36: you. break even on building new
01:11:36 Speaker 36: with assisted living. You are really
01:11:39 Speaker 36: going to struggle to perhaps use
01:11:44 Speaker 36: the same business case to show
01:11:47 Speaker 36: that you're going to break even
01:11:50 Speaker 36: on rehabilitating an existing 30, 35
01:11:52 Speaker 36: year old property. You just don't
01:11:55 Speaker 36: get those same efficiencies. You have
01:11:58 Speaker 36: higher costs. I think whatever pathway
01:12:00 Speaker 36: gets us back to if we
01:12:01 Speaker 36: have to resubmit. another application to
01:12:04 Speaker 36: optimize the current gradeables to 128,
01:12:06 Speaker 36: that's the pathway that we need
01:12:10 Speaker 36: to choose and pursue. Another 128
01:12:12 Speaker 36: building plus the assisted living is
01:12:15 Speaker 36: just an amount of debt that
01:12:19 Speaker 36: continues to go in front of
01:12:21 Speaker 36: this council and future councils, and
01:12:22 Speaker 36: it just prohibits. I mean, those
01:12:28 Speaker 30: are tough discussions we're having yesterday.
01:12:30 Speaker 30: budget, and and the more debt
01:12:34 Speaker 30: you continue to add on, those
01:12:37 Speaker 30: discussions just get harder and harder.
01:12:41 Speaker 29: And we maybe none of us
01:12:44 Speaker 29: will be here to have them,
01:12:47 Speaker 29: but it'll be brutal discussions for
01:12:52 Speaker 29: for future councils on on what
01:12:55 Speaker 29: you can afford to provide for
01:12:57 Speaker 29: your residents. So I think I
01:12:59 Speaker 29: did lean towards option three, the
01:13:00 Speaker 29: one the one line. I had
01:13:04 Speaker 29: under underlined was part of a
01:13:07 Speaker 29: new standalone facility, not an extension
01:13:10 Speaker 29: of the current building, on page
01:13:12 Speaker 29: two. And the question then is,
01:13:15 Speaker 29: why is that there? I think
01:13:17 Speaker 29: you kind of explained it because
01:13:18 Speaker 29: it needs a new application. But
01:13:21 Speaker 29: I think that's the pathway we
01:13:24 Speaker 29: need to pursue: is that new
01:13:29 Speaker 29: application to get those 62 beds
01:13:31 Speaker 29: and pursue the expansion to opt.
01:13:33 Speaker 29: Sue the expansion to optimize Gray
01:13:36 Speaker 29: Gables, not 128 plus whatever it
01:13:38 Speaker 29: might cost to add the assisted
01:13:40 Speaker 29: living. I don't think we can
01:13:43 Speaker 29: afford it. Okay, thank you. Are
01:13:45 Speaker 29: there any further comments? I I
01:13:47 Speaker 29: see a finger pointing. Oh yes,
01:13:49 Speaker 29: sorry, Director Cornell. Thank you, and
01:13:52 Speaker 29: through you, Ward and Matrysovsk. I
01:13:56 Speaker 29: I I wanted to just. flag
01:13:59 Speaker 29: that the per bed cost to
01:14:03 Speaker 29: build is a difficult number to
01:14:09 Speaker 32: nail down without doing this research
01:14:14 Speaker 32: and these these assessments that staff
01:14:17 Speaker 32: are suggesting would be part of
01:14:22 Speaker 32: a report coming back, and part
01:14:24 Speaker 32: of the reason for that is
01:14:29 Speaker 32: that we're we're rarely comparing apples
01:14:30 Speaker 32: to apples, so the Onsound building
01:14:34 Speaker 32: was not green space. It maybe
01:14:37 Speaker 32: had services already. It maybe didn't
01:14:40 Speaker 32: require earthworks. So just as an
01:14:43 Speaker 32: example, and as we were working
01:14:45 Speaker 32: through the process for Rockwood Terrace,
01:14:46 Speaker 32: doing very similar work, trying to
01:14:48 Speaker 32: find comparators, so there'd be a
01:14:52 Speaker 32: building happening in the Arnprior area,
01:14:53 Speaker 32: but they were being attached to
01:14:56 Speaker 32: a hospital that already had existing
01:14:58 Speaker 32: kitchen and laundry. So that had
01:15:06 Speaker 32: an impact on the cost per
01:15:08 Speaker 07: bed. for example. So just to
01:15:10 Speaker 07: share that with council, that those
01:15:12 Speaker 07: are the items that we are
01:15:14 Speaker 07: currently working with information from 2019
01:15:16 Speaker 07: and in the height of the
01:15:20 Speaker 07: pandemic. Having the opportunity to
01:15:23 Speaker 07: gather more recent, current information and
01:15:24 Speaker 07: bring that back will facilitate a
01:15:27 Speaker 07: discussion that has more useful and
01:15:29 Speaker 07: relative, relevant information. Okay, thank you.
01:15:30 Speaker 07: We'll go to Councillor Dobrin. Thank
01:15:34 Speaker 07: you. Through you, just one more
01:15:38 Speaker 07: question. Then, through this evaluation that
01:15:39 Speaker 07: you're proposing, option one to re
01:15:41 Speaker 07: to continue to plan and reevaluate,
01:15:43 Speaker 07: does the province allow us to
01:15:46 Speaker 07: build a 62 bed facility adjacent
01:15:48 Speaker 07: to us? Would that be something
01:15:51 Speaker 07: that would be explored and could
01:15:55 Speaker 07: come back as part of that
01:15:57 Speaker 07: planning? Just as I'm not asking
01:15:59 Speaker 07: for an answer right now because
01:16:01 Speaker 07: we don't know what the province
01:16:03 Speaker 07: is going to do ever, but
01:16:09 Speaker 07: but I'm just wondering if that
01:16:10 Speaker 07: would be something that would be
01:16:14 Speaker 07: explored as an option when it
01:16:16 Speaker 07: does come back to council. Through
01:16:17 Speaker 37: you, Warden, and thank you for
01:16:20 Speaker 37: that question. Depending, obviously, we'll take
01:16:21 Speaker 37: the direction from Council in terms
01:16:23 Speaker 37: of if that wants, if if
01:16:24 Speaker 37: Council wants that to be part
01:16:28 Speaker 37: of the analysis, as Director Cornell
01:16:31 Speaker 37: indicated, based on previous conversations and
01:16:31 Speaker 37: correspondence with the province, that would
01:16:33 Speaker 37: be a full new application. So
01:16:35 Speaker 37: there's the there's the potential risk
01:16:40 Speaker 38: there that the current bed allocation
01:16:43 Speaker 38: of the 62 beds would be.
01:16:45 Speaker 38: potentially lost, but but for sure,
01:16:48 Speaker 38: if council directs us to include
01:16:50 Speaker 38: that as part of the analysis,
01:16:54 Speaker 38: if that's part of say option
01:16:59 Speaker 38: one or a version of option
01:17:01 Speaker 38: one in terms of bringing looking
01:17:05 Speaker 38: at both a 128 bed facility
01:17:09 Speaker 38: plus or a 62 bed facility,
01:17:12 Speaker 38: recognizing that that triggers a new
01:17:16 Speaker 38: application and a new funding model,
01:17:20 Speaker 38: and there's no guarantees that we
01:17:24 Speaker 38: might get that. sixty-two bed allocation
01:17:28 Speaker 38: as a result of that application.
01:17:33 Speaker 38: Okay, we'll go to Councillor Dickerd
01:17:35 Speaker 38: and then over to alternate Councillor
01:17:39 Speaker 38: Allwood. Thank you, Warden Metcalf, and
01:17:40 Speaker 38: thank you, Jen. During our meeting
01:17:46 Speaker 38: yesterday, there was one of the
01:17:49 Speaker 38: questions was the the allowance that
01:17:51 Speaker 38: we get from the province operating
01:17:55 Speaker 38: once the facility is up and
01:17:56 Speaker 38: running. So, if we add sixty-two
01:18:00 Speaker 38: beds to our stock, what kind
01:18:02 Speaker 38: of impact is that going to
01:18:04 Speaker 38: have on our levy going forward?
01:18:07 Speaker 38: Because my understanding was we were
01:18:09 Speaker 38: not getting reimbursed to the amount
01:18:12 Speaker 38: of the costs. Thank you, and
01:18:15 Speaker 38: through you, Madam Chair, I just
01:18:18 Speaker 38: want to clarify in terms of
01:18:19 Speaker 38: operating or the the actual build.
01:18:21 Speaker 38: This would be the operating after
01:18:24 Speaker 38: it's happened. Thank you for that
01:18:26 Speaker 38: clarification. So there. there is still
01:18:28 Speaker 38: a levy impact to operate Rockwood
01:18:30 Speaker 38: Terrace and Lee Manor. What we
01:18:32 Speaker 38: do see is efficiencies in operating
01:18:35 Speaker 38: 128 beds compared to the 66
01:18:38 Speaker 38: beds. So a lot of funding
01:18:41 Speaker 38: is per resident day, per resident
01:18:45 Speaker 38: month, per resident, and so there
01:18:48 Speaker 38: is opportunities for. efficiencies of of
01:18:50 Speaker 38: of purchasing items of the funding
01:18:53 Speaker 38: that comes in. So, for example,
01:18:55 Speaker 38: infection prevention and control is a
01:18:56 Speaker 38: is managers is a good example.
01:18:59 Speaker 38: The province introduced funding to support
01:19:01 Speaker 38: the hiring of those positions in
01:19:05 Speaker 38: long term care. When there's 150
01:19:08 Speaker 38: beds or 128 beds, often the
01:19:09 Speaker 38: fund Beds. Often, the funding is
01:19:11 Speaker 38: enough to support a full time,
01:19:13 Speaker 38: an FTE. When there's 66 beds,
01:19:14 Speaker 38: it's there's enough funding to support
01:19:16 Speaker 38: a a part time FTE. And
01:19:19 Speaker 38: so then comes the discussion in
01:19:23 Speaker 38: operations. We discuss with committee of
01:19:26 Speaker 38: management: Are we able to secure
01:19:27 Speaker 37: and recruit someone part time? Then
01:19:28 Speaker 37: we're if we're not, then we
01:19:30 Speaker 37: look at the we're required to
01:19:31 Speaker 37: have that position on staff, but
01:19:33 Speaker 02: aren't. able to recruit. So then
01:19:42 Speaker 02: there becomes a potential levy impact
01:19:46 Speaker 39: to be able to recruit someone
01:19:47 Speaker 39: full time, where the funding only
01:19:55 Speaker 39: supports part time. Those are the
01:19:57 Speaker 39: kinds of barriers when there is
01:20:00 Speaker 39: a when it's a smaller number
01:20:03 Speaker 39: of residents. The other challenge with
01:20:06 Speaker 39: Great Gables in terms of efficiencies
01:20:12 Speaker 39: is that the home areas are
01:20:17 Speaker 39: 22 residents per home area, where
01:20:18 Speaker 39: the. maximized efficiency, which we're building
01:20:20 Speaker 39: at Rockwood Terrace and we see
01:20:24 Speaker 39: at Lee Manor, is 32 residents
01:20:25 Speaker 39: per home area, and that allows
01:20:30 Speaker 39: for a sufficient staffing complement to
01:20:32 Speaker 39: support the residents in an efficient
01:20:34 Speaker 39: way. When there's 22 people living
01:20:36 Speaker 39: in a home area, you still
01:20:39 Speaker 39: need that base number of staff
01:20:41 Speaker 39: to support the residents, but you
01:20:44 Speaker 39: don't have the number of residents
01:20:46 Speaker 39: and the funding that comes along.
01:20:48 Speaker 40: Does that help? Yes, it helps,
01:20:52 Speaker 40: but I guess the reality is
01:20:55 Speaker 40: when you add more people, if
01:20:58 Speaker 40: you're not being funded at the
01:21:02 Speaker 40: level that it costs to have
01:21:05 Speaker 40: those people, there is going to
01:21:13 Speaker 40: be additional operational costs going forward
01:21:16 Speaker 40: when you add sixty-two beds. Yes.
01:21:18 Speaker 40: Okay. Next, we'll go to the
01:21:20 Speaker 40: deputy warden. Thank you, warden, and
01:21:22 Speaker 40: thank you, Jen, for the report.
01:21:24 Speaker 40: The amount of yeah yeah it
01:21:27 Speaker 40: was fairly brief too but the
01:21:29 Speaker 40: amount of potential debt and and
01:21:30 Speaker 40: how it could impact the operations
01:21:33 Speaker 40: of this county overall concerns me
01:21:35 Speaker 40: so I'm inclined to support option
01:21:37 Speaker 40: three the demographics of the province.
01:21:40 Speaker 40: Graphics of the province and indeed
01:21:41 Speaker 40: of Canada would indicate that we're
01:21:43 Speaker 40: going to need more long-term care
01:21:44 Speaker 40: beds well into the future, for
01:21:46 Speaker 40: the foreseeable future. And I and
01:21:49 Speaker 40: I get the risk that the
01:21:51 Speaker 40: ministry may rescind the allocation due
01:21:57 Speaker 40: to lack of commitment. I would
01:21:59 Speaker 40: challenge anybody from the ministry to
01:22:00 Speaker 40: come here and stand here and
01:22:01 Speaker 40: say that this council and this
01:22:05 Speaker 41: staff are not committed to long-term
01:22:08 Speaker 41: care and. To long-term care in
01:22:09 Speaker 41: Gray County, our staff have moved
01:22:11 Speaker 41: heaven and earth to provide new
01:22:15 Speaker 41: beds in this community. The number
01:22:17 Speaker 41: of meetings associated with door handles
01:22:20 Speaker 41: alone would prove that this group
01:22:22 Speaker 41: is committed to long-term care. So,
01:22:24 Speaker 41: the repayment ability for the current
01:22:26 Speaker 41: build in Durham is. already pretty
01:22:28 Speaker 41: much built into the budget, and
01:22:32 Speaker 41: we've shown that we can afford
01:22:35 Speaker 41: that. It's a stretch, but we
01:22:37 Speaker 41: can afford it. To pour more
01:22:39 Speaker 41: debt onto that repayment ability, that
01:22:42 Speaker 41: risks not being able to build
01:22:44 Speaker 41: a bridge somewhere five years down
01:22:47 Speaker 41: the road. So I'm inclined to
01:22:49 Speaker 41: think that we need. I would
01:22:51 Speaker 41: dare the ministry to pull those
01:22:54 Speaker 41: bids back. I don't think Paul
01:22:56 Speaker 41: Vickers would come here and say
01:22:59 Speaker 41: you need to do this. otherwise
01:23:00 Speaker 41: we're going to pull those beds
01:23:03 Speaker 41: back. No way, I don't think
01:23:04 Speaker 41: he would, and he shouldn't. So
01:23:06 Speaker 41: I'm I'm inclined to support option
01:23:08 Speaker 41: three. Okay, thank you. And oh,
01:23:09 Speaker 41: I'm sorry, I skipped over. I
01:23:13 Speaker 41: went to that direction and forgot
01:23:19 Speaker 41: to finish on the left here.
01:23:21 Speaker 41: So alternate Aldwood, please go ahead.
01:23:22 Speaker 41: Thank you, Warden Metrasaw. I mean,
01:23:27 Speaker 41: I think option one gives us
01:23:29 Speaker 41: the opportunity to revisit the actual
01:23:30 Speaker 41: costs. Visit the actual costs per
01:23:33 Speaker 41: bed in today's economy. I mean,
01:23:38 Speaker 41: Councillor Gregg mentioned the private facilities
01:23:41 Speaker 41: costs per bed. Director Cornell mentioned,
01:23:42 Speaker 41: you know, the apples to apples
01:23:46 Speaker 41: comparison and the difficulties in determining
01:23:47 Speaker 41: what those costs are. What Option
01:23:53 Speaker 41: One does is gives this council
01:23:54 Speaker 41: an opportunity to know, in today's
01:23:56 Speaker 41: economy, what those potential costs would
01:23:58 Speaker 41: be. We're not committing to the
01:23:59 Speaker 36: project at this point. We're committing
01:24:04 Speaker 36: to. refining our estimate of the
01:24:06 Speaker 36: cost for beds. There's no doubt,
01:24:08 Speaker 36: as Councillor Milne just mentioned, that
01:24:12 Speaker 36: the need for beds and the
01:24:14 Speaker 02: need for assisted living is is
01:24:42 Speaker 27: a real concern. Not just in
01:24:44 Speaker 27: Grey County, there's competition for those
01:24:45 Speaker 27: beds across the province. So I
01:24:47 Speaker 27: believe the risk with option three
01:24:49 Speaker 27: should not be minimized. I think
01:24:51 Speaker 27: option one does not commit us
01:24:52 Speaker 27: to the project. It gives us
01:24:53 Speaker 27: better information. The concern about the
01:24:55 Speaker 42: long-term debt and the RRL situation—I
01:25:05 Speaker 42: think it was mentioned—13%. There's that
01:25:06 Speaker 42: significant difference in the cost of
01:25:07 Speaker 42: those beds could potentially bring it
01:25:09 Speaker 27: back down to within our approved
01:25:10 Speaker 27: policy. But again, option one gives
01:25:14 Speaker 27: us better information, does not commit
01:25:15 Speaker 27: to moving the project forward, and
01:25:17 Speaker 27: allows council to make an informed
01:25:19 Speaker 27: decision. Thank you. Okay, we'll go
01:25:21 Speaker 27: to Councillor Greg. I'd like to
01:25:22 Speaker 27: make a motion to split the
01:25:23 Speaker 27: vote, please, because parts two and
01:25:24 Speaker 27: three are very much intertwined in
01:25:28 Speaker 27: the recommendation. Okay, so Councillor Greg,
01:25:32 Speaker 27: could you just please articulate to
01:25:37 Speaker 27: the clerk out of the paragraphs
01:25:38 Speaker 27: that have been moved and seconded,
01:25:40 Speaker 27: which ones you would like split?
01:25:42 Speaker 43: One through four, I think, is
01:25:48 Speaker 07: appropriate for the. Four, I think,
01:25:51 Speaker 07: is appropriate for this, as opposed
01:25:53 Speaker 07: to any amendments hitting the floor.
01:25:55 Speaker 07: I think it's clear to split
01:25:58 Speaker 07: the vote initially and then introduce
01:25:59 Speaker 07: amendments. Okay, so Councillor Greg, what
01:26:01 Speaker 07: we like then is is a
01:26:04 Speaker 07: motion to divide. So I will
01:26:05 Speaker 07: look for a seconder for that.
01:26:08 Speaker 07: May I ask for a seconder?
01:26:09 Speaker 07: Okay, it's seconded by Councillor Eccles.
01:26:11 Speaker 07: So we'll give the clerk a
01:26:14 Speaker 07: moment to put that up on
01:26:15 Speaker 07: the screen, so everyone knows what
01:26:19 Speaker 44: they are voting for. Okay, so
01:26:25 Speaker 44: we'll give a moment for it
01:26:27 Speaker 44: to come up on the screen,
01:26:29 Speaker 44: but I can read it out:
01:26:32 Speaker 44: that the motion be amended to
01:26:33 Speaker 27: strike clauses. Oh, nope. Sorry. There
01:26:35 Speaker 27: we go. Okay, that the motion
01:26:36 Speaker 27: be divided into four clauses. That
01:26:40 Speaker 27: is simply the motion that is
01:26:41 Speaker 27: on the floor, moved and seconded.
01:26:43 Speaker 27: But for the sake of everyone
01:26:45 Speaker 27: knowing what they're voting on, I'd
01:26:47 Speaker 27: like to see it up on
01:26:50 Speaker 27: the screen as well. There we
01:26:52 Speaker 27: go. Maybe in a bigger font.
01:26:53 Speaker 27: Okay, so that is what we
01:26:56 Speaker 27: are discussing at this point in
01:26:59 Speaker 27: time. Any discussion on the amendment
01:27:02 Speaker 27: that is before us to split
01:27:03 Speaker 27: it? Yes, CAO. Thank you, Board.
01:27:03 Speaker 27: Depending on obviously council's direction on
01:27:07 Speaker 27: on clause two, as well as
01:27:09 Speaker 27: potentially then clause three, clause three
01:27:11 Speaker 27: and four probably need to be
01:27:12 Speaker 27: together just based on the tight
01:27:16 Speaker 27: timelines that we're under. again, depending
01:27:19 Speaker 27: on the direction that's provided by
01:27:21 Speaker 27: council with respect to any amended
01:27:23 Speaker 27: motions that may come about for
01:27:25 Speaker 27: clauses two and three. So, so
01:27:26 Speaker 27: I'm just raising that because three
01:27:28 Speaker 27: and four are fundamentally linked in
01:27:30 Speaker 27: terms of meeting those timelines, depending
01:27:31 Speaker 27: on the direction that council provides.
01:27:36 Speaker 27: That makes sense. Okay, so perhaps
01:27:38 Speaker 27: what I, Madam Clerk, would it
01:27:40 Speaker 27: work then that we keep. the
01:27:43 Speaker 27: motion to amend in four clauses,
01:27:45 Speaker 27: but when we get after we've
01:27:46 Speaker 27: voted on the first two, then
01:27:49 Speaker 27: we'll pause and see if we
01:27:50 Speaker 27: need to combine three and four?
01:27:52 Speaker 27: Okay, so we will have that
01:27:54 Speaker 27: flexibility if we do it that
01:27:55 Speaker 27: way. Okay, any other discussion on
01:27:58 Speaker 27: separating these clauses and voting clause
01:27:59 Speaker 27: by clause? Okay, I don't see
01:28:01 Speaker 27: any hands going up. Then I'll
01:28:02 Speaker 27: call that vote. All those in
01:28:04 Speaker 27: favour of the amendment, and that
01:28:06 Speaker 27: motion is carried. Okay, so we'll
01:28:07 Speaker 27: now look at them each individually.
01:28:09 Speaker 27: And again, it would be helpful
01:28:10 Speaker 27: we could have that up on
01:28:13 Speaker 27: the screen. Thank you. Okay, so
01:28:14 Speaker 27: we're there. Before we get into
01:28:16 Speaker 27: any of the votings of these,
01:28:19 Speaker 27: was there any final discussion as
01:28:21 Speaker 27: a whole? Okay, and just to
01:28:23 Speaker 27: recap, Director Cornell, as you introduced
01:28:25 Speaker 27: at the beginning, as we talk
01:28:29 Speaker 27: about these various different options, that
01:28:31 Speaker 27: there's obviously good dialogueue going. on
01:28:35 Speaker 27: here that you can take away
01:28:36 Speaker 27: in terms of the future report.
01:28:37 Speaker 27: The kinds of questions. Oh, okay.
01:28:39 Speaker 27: Just to hold on a moment,
01:28:40 Speaker 27: Councillor Arkes. Sorry, there's just movement
01:28:41 Speaker 27: going on back here. Okay, we'll
01:28:43 Speaker 27: just wait a moment there. So
01:28:44 Speaker 27: you've you've this will inform the
01:28:47 Speaker 27: future report that's going to be
01:28:48 Speaker 27: coming. You have mentioned that we're
01:28:49 Speaker 27: not making any any decision here.
01:28:55 Speaker 27: That this does not commit us
01:29:01 Speaker 27: in any one way or another.
01:29:03 Speaker 23: It does respond to the readiness.
01:29:05 Speaker 23: so that we can do our
01:29:11 Speaker 23: due diligence and respond to the
01:29:12 Speaker 23: the province the way that they're
01:29:15 Speaker 23: asking. Whether or not we like
01:29:21 Speaker 23: what the province does in terms
01:29:25 Speaker 23: of this or how we articulate
01:29:29 Speaker 23: our commitment, that aside, they've given
01:29:32 Speaker 23: us homework to do. We have
01:29:34 Speaker 23: to respond to that. It would
01:29:37 Speaker 23: though. This does give us the
01:29:43 Speaker 23: time and space to do the
01:29:45 Speaker 23: preliminary work and put together a
01:29:50 Speaker 23: future report that will help inform
01:29:52 Speaker 23: a future decision. Did I encapsulate
01:29:55 Speaker 23: that correctly? Okay. Thank you. All
01:29:58 Speaker 23: right. So with that, then let's
01:30:04 Speaker 23: visit. the clauses individually. We have
01:30:06 Speaker 23: the first one is that report
01:30:11 Speaker 23: LTCR CW nineteen twenty five capital
01:30:13 Speaker 23: funding programme and ministry survey be
01:30:16 Speaker 23: received. This is oh sorry yeah,
01:30:18 Speaker 23: and I am going back to
01:30:21 Speaker 23: Councillor Eccles, but I do want
01:30:22 Speaker 23: to clarify that all four of
01:30:25 Speaker 23: these clauses are still moved and
01:30:28 Speaker 23: seconded by the original mover and
01:30:34 Speaker 23: seconder. But I did see a
01:30:38 Speaker 23: hand go up when there was
01:30:44 Speaker 23: some staff interaction over on this
01:30:46 Speaker 23: side, so I'll just look to
01:30:48 Speaker 23: Councillor Eccles. Did you have a
01:30:51 Speaker 23: comment? Thank you. And further, we're
01:30:53 Speaker 23: taking this motion, and as I
01:30:59 Speaker 23: read it, in number two says
01:31:01 Speaker 23: readiness for potential development. We talked
01:31:05 Speaker 23: about something about what the debt
01:31:07 Speaker 23: load is going to be. Right,
01:31:11 Speaker 23: the present moment we have 319
01:31:14 Speaker 23: beds. My somewhere around the potential
01:31:17 Speaker 23: of the tax levy dollars, there's
01:31:20 Speaker 23: somewhere between five to ten million
01:31:21 Speaker 23: dollars a year from the levy
01:31:25 Speaker 23: goes into support that. My in
01:31:27 Speaker 23: the ballpark for that. So at
01:31:31 Speaker 23: five million dollars, 319 beds. For
01:31:33 Speaker 23: quick math, it's about fifteen. Yeah,
01:31:35 Speaker 23: but fifteen thousand dollars per bed
01:31:39 Speaker 23: that we subsidize those beds. If
01:31:41 Speaker 23: it's obviously ten million, it's closer
01:31:45 Speaker 23: to thirty-one thousand dollars per bed
01:31:48 Speaker 23: per year. The last time these
01:31:49 Speaker 23: conversations come up around long-term care
01:31:52 Speaker 23: and everything else, I didn't have
01:31:54 Speaker 23: any gray hair, but that was
01:32:01 Speaker 23: a number of years ago. I've
01:32:02 Speaker 23: developed a little bit more since.
01:32:07 Speaker 23: I suspect that I'll develop a
01:32:09 Speaker 23: lot more if this conversation goes
01:32:11 Speaker 23: much further. 62 more beds isn't
01:32:13 Speaker 23: going to get us any operational
01:32:15 Speaker 23: efficiency. Lee Manor was redone, refurbished
01:32:18 Speaker 23: to get operational efficiencies, and we
01:32:21 Speaker 23: really haven't. It. continues to go
01:32:23 Speaker 23: up at the rate of inflation
01:32:24 Speaker 23: for what the county puts into
01:32:26 Speaker 23: beds. Another sixty-two. The debt to
01:32:27 Speaker 23: build a hundred and twenty-eight bed
01:32:29 Speaker 23: facility is tough to swallow, but
01:32:32 Speaker 23: it's going to be the ongoing
01:32:34 Speaker 23: support of that. I think that's
01:32:37 Speaker 23: where Councillor Dickert was going to
01:32:39 Speaker 23: put that against and the repayment
01:32:40 Speaker 23: of that debt. conversations around here,
01:32:43 Speaker 23: and we all are concerned that
01:32:44 Speaker 23: the federal government has put themselves
01:32:47 Speaker 23: into so much debt. Our grandchildren,
01:32:52 Speaker 23: when they're in these facilities, will
01:32:53 Speaker 27: never see it paid off. And
01:32:54 Speaker 27: efficiencies that could be get, or
01:32:56 Speaker 27: be got, if that money hadn't
01:32:59 Speaker 27: been borrowed. Our province has been
01:33:00 Speaker 27: even worse, in my mind, about
01:33:02 Speaker 27: accumulating debt. over the last twenty
01:33:03 Speaker 27: years, and that's been under two
01:33:07 Speaker 27: different governments. So I'm not favouring
01:33:08 Speaker 27: one over the other. And the
01:33:10 Speaker 27: previous one in the '90s was
01:33:11 Speaker 27: probably even worse. Again, I I'm
01:33:13 Speaker 27: having difficulty. We've got to vote
01:33:14 Speaker 27: on number two, and number three
01:33:15 Speaker 07: and four are the ones that
01:33:22 Speaker 07: are saying, "Give us the information."
01:33:23 Speaker 07: Number two's already saying we're going
01:33:24 Speaker 07: to tell the province that yes,
01:33:26 Speaker 07: we're ready for this. I'd like
01:33:28 Speaker 07: to see us pull ahead of
01:33:31 Speaker 07: that. At least get some numbers
01:33:34 Speaker 07: before we go and tell the
01:33:37 Speaker 07: province and fill out this survey.
01:33:38 Speaker 07: Yep, we're going so far down
01:33:41 Speaker 07: the rabbit hole here, boys. We
01:33:43 Speaker 07: can't get back out of it.
01:33:48 Speaker 07: And then have question ten years
01:33:50 Speaker 07: later around this, Arshu. How do
01:33:51 Speaker 07: we find enough not to build
01:33:52 Speaker 07: a bridge? but to even put
01:33:56 Speaker 07: in a culvert. You won't need
01:34:00 Speaker 07: to worry about that in ten
01:34:02 Speaker 07: years, Pat. But it'll be something
01:34:04 Speaker 07: that your legacy's left with. Okay,
01:34:07 Speaker 07: thank you. I'm going to look
01:34:11 Speaker 07: to Director Cornell. She'd like to
01:34:14 Speaker 07: address any of that. So the
01:34:15 Speaker 07: question is: Is the challenge of
01:34:18 Speaker 07: voting on Clause Two when we
01:34:20 Speaker 07: don't perhaps know what might be
01:34:23 Speaker 07: out there in terms of Clause
01:34:25 Speaker 07: Three and Four? You did say
01:34:28 Speaker 07: that we are direct. We are
01:34:29 Speaker 07: directed to respond to the survey,
01:34:33 Speaker 07: but it does not commit. So,
01:34:34 Speaker 07: do you want to just address
01:34:39 Speaker 07: the comments that were made by
01:34:41 Speaker 07: Councillor Eccles? Oh, we'll go to
01:34:43 Speaker 07: the CAO for that. Thank you.
01:34:44 Speaker 07: Thank you, Warden. This goes back
01:34:45 Speaker 07: to my previous comments in terms
01:34:47 Speaker 07: of depending on the direction of
01:34:49 Speaker 07: council with respect to Clause Two
01:34:50 Speaker 07: and how then Clause Three and
01:34:54 Speaker 07: Four then potentially play out, as
01:34:57 Speaker 07: the Warden indicated and Director Cornell
01:34:58 Speaker 07: indicated. we do have to provide
01:35:01 Speaker 07: a response to the province by
01:35:04 Speaker 07: September 29th in terms of the
01:35:06 Speaker 07: current bed allocations of 62 beds
01:35:12 Speaker 27: as as it relates to Grey
01:35:14 Speaker 27: Gables. So, so as noted in
01:35:15 Speaker 27: the report, there's three options that
01:35:18 Speaker 27: are that are laid out in
01:35:20 Speaker 27: those report in the report. My
01:35:22 Speaker 27: my recommendation is that that council
01:35:24 Speaker 27: consider those those three options. If
01:35:27 Speaker 27: if if council is not supportive
01:35:30 Speaker 27: of of the options. being put
01:35:32 Speaker 27: forward, or as being recommended, then
01:35:35 Speaker 27: then I I would recommend council
01:35:37 Speaker 27: then consider the the other two
01:35:39 Speaker 27: options because then that will provide
01:35:46 Speaker 27: the direction that will staff requires
01:35:47 Speaker 27: in order to respond back to
01:35:48 Speaker 27: the the survey that's due on
01:35:49 Speaker 27: Tuesday or Monday or whatever day
01:35:53 Speaker 27: that is. So that's that would
01:35:54 Speaker 27: be my my recommendation at this
01:35:56 Speaker 27: stage because then it it clearly
01:35:58 Speaker 27: then identifies how. we're going to
01:36:00 Speaker 27: be responding to that survey. As
01:36:02 Speaker 27: noted, there's there's potential risks as
01:36:04 Speaker 27: it relates to options two and
01:36:05 Speaker 27: three. There's potential a lot more
01:48:11 Speaker 27: work to be done as it
01:48:13 Speaker 27: relates to even the staff recommendation
01:49:00 Speaker 27: of option one to bring to
01:49:02 Speaker 27: do that further analysis or bring
01:49:03 Speaker 27: that information back to council. And
01:49:05 Speaker 27: so, depending on again the direction
01:49:06 Speaker 27: from council, my my suggestion would
01:49:08 Speaker 27: be to look at the three
01:49:09 Speaker 27: options within the report to provide.
01:49:11 Speaker 27: direction as it relates to, I'll
01:49:12 Speaker 27: say, what Clause Two looks like.
01:49:20 Speaker 27: Okay, thank you. Any other comments?
01:49:21 Speaker 27: We're looking at voting on Clause
01:49:24 Speaker 45: One, which is to receive the
01:49:27 Speaker 45: report. Okay, so it's been moved
01:49:30 Speaker 45: and seconded by the original movers
01:49:32 Speaker 45: and seconders, and we are now
01:49:35 Speaker 45: going to. I'm going to call
01:49:37 Speaker 45: the the vote on that. The
01:49:40 Speaker 45: report LTCRCW twenty five. Our CW
01:49:42 Speaker 45: twenty five nineteen twenty five capital
01:49:44 Speaker 45: funding programme and ministry survey be
01:49:49 Speaker 45: received. Okay, I'll call that vote.
01:49:50 Speaker 36: All those in favour, and that
01:49:53 Speaker 36: motion is carried. Okay, so we
01:49:55 Speaker 36: now sit. Okay, so the clerk
01:49:57 Speaker 36: has advised that this would be
01:50:00 Speaker 36: a good point for us to
01:50:06 Speaker 46: take a break because we're also
01:50:11 Speaker 46: being conscious of of the rest
01:50:12 Speaker 46: of the day and the rest
01:50:16 Speaker 46: of the edition. But Director Cornell,
01:50:20 Speaker 46: perhaps you need a break at
01:50:22 Speaker 46: this point. Now perhaps you need
01:50:23 Speaker 46: a break at this point too.
01:50:25 Speaker 46: So we'll do our ten-minute. If
01:50:26 Speaker 01: we can be back at twenty-two,
01:50:29 Speaker 01: please, then we will come back
01:50:32 Speaker 01: in twelve minutes. Thank you. If
01:50:33 Speaker 01: I could just call our council
01:50:58 Speaker 42: members back to the table, thank
01:50:59 Speaker 01: you. Okay, I have the word
01:51:00 Speaker 01: from technology that we are good
01:51:01 Speaker 01: to go after our break. And
01:51:05 Speaker 01: at this point in time, then
01:51:08 Speaker 01: I would just like to take
01:51:09 Speaker 01: a moment to defer to the
01:51:17 Speaker 02: deputy CEO if there's any clarity
01:51:21 Speaker 02: he would like to provide on
01:51:24 Speaker 27: this next consideration, which is clause
01:51:27 Speaker 27: number two. Thank you very much,
01:51:28 Speaker 27: and to you, Madam Warden. So,
01:51:30 Speaker 27: just just for clarity, recommendation number
01:51:33 Speaker 27: two in the report, in essence,
01:51:36 Speaker 27: if that fails, it's a direction
01:51:39 Speaker 27: to staff to not respond to
01:51:41 Speaker 27: the survey. So, recommendations three and
01:51:43 Speaker 27: four are there for mute. So,
01:51:48 Speaker 27: if recommendation two fails on the
01:51:52 Speaker 27: floor, we will not be responding
01:51:54 Speaker 27: to the survey on Monday. Okay,
01:51:57 Speaker 47: thank you. Now, was there a
01:52:00 Speaker 01: question from Councillor Grave? Yes. Yes,
01:52:03 Speaker 01: thank you. And I'd like to
01:52:04 Speaker 01: introduce an amendment to Clause Two
01:52:06 Speaker 01: that staff respond to the ministry
01:52:08 Speaker 01: survey representing Option Three as Council's
01:52:11 Speaker 01: direction. Okay, thank you. Sorry, and
01:52:14 Speaker 01: the second part is that you
01:52:19 Speaker 01: wish for it to be recorded.
01:52:22 Speaker 48: and a recorded vote if there's
01:52:25 Speaker 48: a seconder. Okay, so while that's
01:52:28 Speaker 48: coming up on the screen for
01:52:31 Speaker 07: us, I will put the question
01:52:34 Speaker 07: out: Is there a seconder for
01:52:35 Speaker 07: the amendment that Councillor Greg has
01:52:39 Speaker 07: put forward? Councillor McKay is seconding.
01:52:41 Speaker 07: So we'll give a moment for
01:52:45 Speaker 07: it to come up onto the
01:52:47 Speaker 07: screen. Sorry, I can't read from
01:52:49 Speaker 07: the back of my head. So
01:52:51 Speaker 07: they're just putting it in front
01:52:52 Speaker 07: of here for me. Wasn't a
01:52:55 Speaker 07: trait that I developed acutely as
01:52:56 Speaker 07: a teacher to see everything from
01:52:59 Speaker 07: the back of my head. I
01:53:01 Speaker 07: always had good ears, though, Councillor
01:53:03 Speaker 07: Eccles. Okay, Madam Clerk, that's good.
01:53:06 Speaker 07: Okay, so it's been moved and
01:53:09 Speaker 07: seconded. The amendment to the motion
01:53:13 Speaker 07: reads that the motion be amended
01:53:15 Speaker 07: to strike the words "Gray County's
01:53:17 Speaker 07: readiness to potentially develop the approved
01:53:19 Speaker 07: 62 long-term care beds at Gray
01:53:21 Speaker 07: Gables" and insert. that staff request
01:53:23 Speaker 07: the ministry to maintain the 62
01:53:28 Speaker 07: bed allocation and provide further information
01:53:32 Speaker 07: in 2027. Okay. And okay, the
01:53:35 Speaker 07: provide further information is the staff
01:53:37 Speaker 01: directive, not the ministry. Correct. Okay.
01:53:39 Speaker 01: All right. So with that, let
01:53:41 Speaker 01: me ask for staff response in
01:53:43 Speaker 01: terms of should this motion
01:53:45 Speaker 01: pass, what would that mean? Let's
01:53:46 Speaker 01: do the if and the just
01:53:48 Speaker 01: so we understand. And just so
01:53:50 Speaker 01: we understand, because we have broken
01:53:51 Speaker 01: this this particular recommendation into its
01:53:53 Speaker 01: four components, who on staff would
01:53:56 Speaker 01: like to begin? Cao. Thank you,
01:53:58 Speaker 01: board. Should this amended motion pass,
01:54:00 Speaker 01: and then the fully amended, revised
01:54:03 Speaker 01: motion, clause two pass, then looking
01:54:07 Speaker 01: at clauses three and four, like
01:54:08 Speaker 32: this provides staff then with enough
01:54:12 Speaker 32: direction to respond to the. survey
01:54:19 Speaker 32: response. Clause three and four would
01:54:20 Speaker 32: essentially be then tabled, essentially, or
01:54:21 Speaker 27: what Saff would recommend is table
01:54:23 Speaker 27: those those clauses three and four
01:54:25 Speaker 27: because they essentially become redundant at
01:54:28 Speaker 27: this point in time. We don't
01:54:37 Speaker 02: need to proceed with the analysis
01:54:41 Speaker 02: at this time. We don't need
01:54:43 Speaker 07: to proceed with them bringing back
01:54:44 Speaker 07: further information in order to hit
01:54:48 Speaker 07: that development agreement deadline of March
01:54:51 Speaker 07: twenty twenty six. Again, going back
01:54:54 Speaker 07: to what was indicated earlier by
01:54:56 Speaker 07: staff, if if this amended option
01:54:57 Speaker 07: were to proceed, as noted in
01:54:59 Speaker 07: option three in the report, the
01:55:01 Speaker 07: ministry ministry may rescind the allocation
01:55:03 Speaker 07: just due to lack of commitment.
01:55:05 Speaker 07: So, so that is the potential
01:55:11 Speaker 07: risk, and just wanted to again
01:55:11 Speaker 07: flag that for for council's awareness.
01:55:13 Speaker 07: Okay, so for clarification, should this
01:55:14 Speaker 07: this amendment pass, the the part
01:55:17 Speaker 07: where we say that we request
01:55:22 Speaker 49: the ministry maintain the sixty two
01:55:24 Speaker 50: bed allocation and provide further information
01:55:28 Speaker 50: in twenty twenty seven. Although we
01:55:31 Speaker 50: know the commitment and we have
01:55:34 Speaker 50: certainly demonstrated the commitment commitment to
01:55:38 Speaker 50: the province, the province may
01:55:41 Speaker 50: just simply say that means you're
01:55:45 Speaker 50: not ready, so we're going to
01:55:48 Speaker 20: move those sixty two beds out
01:55:50 Speaker 20: of this region. Okay, all right.
01:55:56 Speaker 20: So with that, this particular amendment
01:55:59 Speaker 38: is now open for discussion. We'll
01:56:01 Speaker 38: go to Councillor Debrine. Thank you,
01:56:05 Speaker 38: and through you. to whomever can
01:56:08 Speaker 38: answer, we are requesting the ministry
01:56:11 Speaker 38: to maintain the 62 bed allocation,
01:56:14 Speaker 38: and that the ministry provide further
01:56:19 Speaker 38: information in 2027. Sorry, that was
01:56:23 Speaker 38: the question that I asked in
01:56:26 Speaker 38: terms of the grammar. So the
01:56:28 Speaker 38: the intent of the motion is
01:56:31 Speaker 38: that it's staff provide the further
01:56:33 Speaker 38: information. I understand why you're asking
01:56:36 Speaker 38: for that clarification. through you, Warden.
01:56:42 Speaker 38: I would take that as that
01:56:46 Speaker 38: that staff through further direction from
01:56:49 Speaker 38: council would need to provide further
01:56:51 Speaker 18: information to the ministry in 2027.
01:56:53 Speaker 18: But at this stage, if this
01:56:54 Speaker 18: again minute clause were to pass,
01:56:57 Speaker 18: we would respond to the ministry
01:56:59 Speaker 18: at this stage to say we
01:57:01 Speaker 18: would we would. request the ministry
01:57:04 Speaker 18: to maintain the sixty two bed
01:57:05 Speaker 18: allocation, and we will provide further
01:57:06 Speaker 18: information in twenty twenty seven once
01:57:08 Speaker 18: we have further information at that
01:57:11 Speaker 18: time. Okay, just before I go
01:57:12 Speaker 18: to the follow up, Madam Clerk,
01:57:14 Speaker 18: I'm going to ask that you
01:57:15 Speaker 18: just insert staff provide further information
01:57:19 Speaker 30: so that there's no question. Okay,
01:57:20 Speaker 30: Councillor Debrine. So the staff providing
01:57:22 Speaker 30: further information to the ministry in
01:57:25 Speaker 30: twenty twenty seven. In 2027, do
01:57:28 Speaker 51: we have an opportunity in replying
01:57:29 Speaker 51: to the survey to explain the
01:57:31 Speaker 51: nature of why, until we actually
01:57:35 Speaker 51: finish our Rockwood Terrace redevelopment, so
01:57:45 Speaker 02: that they know that we have
01:57:47 Speaker 02: a desire to pursue, but we
01:57:50 Speaker 35: just cannot commit at this time.
01:57:51 Speaker 35: Through you, Madam Chair. So the
01:57:53 Speaker 35: survey has limited fields, but there
01:57:54 Speaker 35: is an opportunity to articulate barriers
01:57:57 Speaker 35: and challenges. So those barriers and
01:57:58 Speaker 35: challenges could be listed there. And
01:58:00 Speaker 35: I just wanted to make sure
01:58:02 Speaker 35: that I'm clear as staff that
01:58:03 Speaker 35: the the option three is that
01:58:04 Speaker 35: that that our we will provide.
01:58:08 Speaker 35: further information on direction from County
01:58:10 Speaker 35: Council to the Ministry of Long-Term
01:58:11 Speaker 35: Care in 2027. So there are
01:58:13 Speaker 35: limited fields, but there is an
01:58:14 Speaker 35: opportunity to note barriers and challenges.
01:58:16 Speaker 35: Okay, we'll go to alternate. Alternate
01:58:17 Speaker 35: hope. Yes, thank you. This is
01:58:19 Speaker 35: very difficult, especially since I'm a
01:58:22 Speaker 35: relatively new arrival here, but in
01:58:23 Speaker 35: the Townsville Mountains, we've been dealing
01:58:24 Speaker 35: with the Ministry about long-term care
01:58:26 Speaker 35: beds, and what I have learned
01:58:27 Speaker 35: is you you don't want to
01:58:28 Speaker 35: risk the beds. And what I've
01:58:33 Speaker 41: heard from the CAO is is
01:58:34 Speaker 41: that that is the risk that
01:58:37 Speaker 41: we're taking right now. Even though
01:58:40 Speaker 41: we're trying to cover it with
01:58:43 Speaker 41: the motion, we are risking not
01:58:44 Speaker 41: moving forward. And I'm being governed
01:58:47 Speaker 41: by that and the experience that
01:58:49 Speaker 41: I've had at the Townsville Mountains.
01:58:50 Speaker 31: Thank you. Okay. Thank you. And
01:58:51 Speaker 31: are there other comments? We're going
01:58:54 Speaker 31: to go. to alternate Councillor Alwood,
01:58:56 Speaker 31: and then over to Councillor Carlton.
01:58:58 Speaker 31: Thank you, Ward Metrissop. Just for
01:59:00 Speaker 31: clarity, if we went with option
01:59:02 Speaker 31: three, does that take us out
01:59:03 Speaker 31: of this capital funding programme timeline?
01:59:05 Speaker 31: We wouldn't be eligible. So, you,
01:59:09 Speaker 31: Madam Chair, I'll take that one.
01:59:10 Speaker 31: That's hard to say. So we
01:59:13 Speaker 31: don't know how long, how quickly
01:59:15 Speaker 31: the province will respond if we
01:59:18 Speaker 31: tell them we're interested in the
01:59:19 Speaker 31: 62 bed allocation. We have to
01:59:23 Speaker 31: now wait for the province to
01:59:25 Speaker 31: tell us what they'd like us
01:59:28 Speaker 31: to do with that allocation. We
01:59:29 Speaker 31: do know that next milestone they've
01:59:32 Speaker 14: laid out in this grant round,
01:59:34 Speaker 14: though, is March 2026, and and
01:59:35 Speaker 14: you know unless the province responds
01:59:37 Speaker 14: very quickly and we're able to
01:59:40 Speaker 14: come back before council and receive
01:59:42 Speaker 14: direction very quickly, it's going to
01:59:47 Speaker 14: be very difficult for us to
01:59:48 Speaker 14: get the background work done in
01:59:49 Speaker 14: order to. Groundwork done in order
01:59:51 Speaker 14: to inform that to meet that
01:59:55 Speaker 14: March 2026 deadline. So, assuming that
01:59:56 Speaker 52: it takes some time for the
01:59:59 Speaker 52: province to come back to us,
02:00:06 Speaker 52: we've got we would have a
02:00:10 Speaker 27: very very short amount of time
02:00:12 Speaker 27: to meet the next deadline in
02:00:15 Speaker 27: the capital funding. Follow up for
02:00:17 Speaker 27: me. So it adds another element
02:00:18 Speaker 27: of risk to moving this forward.
02:00:20 Speaker 27: Thank you. Yes, the CEO has
02:00:22 Speaker 27: confirmed that is correct. An extra
02:00:24 Speaker 27: element of risk. We'll go to
02:00:26 Speaker 27: Councillor Carleton. Thank you. So that
02:00:29 Speaker 27: was part of my comment was
02:00:32 Speaker 27: about the element of risk and
02:00:33 Speaker 27: do we really want to risk
02:00:36 Speaker 27: losing that allocation at this point
02:00:39 Speaker 27: when we don't have all the
02:00:41 Speaker 27: information yet? But it means if
02:00:42 Speaker 27: we risk losing that and not
02:00:44 Speaker 27: having the redevelopment go forward or
02:00:50 Speaker 27: a new build go forward at
02:00:53 Speaker 05: Gray Gables, we continue to run
02:00:55 Speaker 05: those beds less than operational efficiency.
02:01:09 Speaker 05: We've got twenty-two beds in
02:01:15 Speaker 05: each unit where we've been
02:01:21 Speaker 05: told that thirty-two get some
02:01:27 Speaker 05: efficiency and. saving on costs, so
02:01:33 Speaker 05: I just hesitate to lose the
02:01:38 Speaker 05: ability to get that information going
02:01:42 Speaker 05: forward on what everything would be
02:01:48 Speaker 05: before we make a decision. So,
02:01:54 Speaker 05: thank you. Okay, thank you, and
02:02:08 Speaker 05: we'll go to Councillor Kibney. Thank
02:02:16 Speaker 05: you, Warden Matrissos. And just as
02:02:20 Speaker 05: a matter of information for County
02:02:22 Speaker 01: Council, I did ask our Deputy
02:02:23 Speaker 01: CAO at break about our current
02:02:29 Speaker 01: ARL, and I'll turn to to
02:02:32 Speaker 01: Allen if you would share that
02:02:35 Speaker 01: with County Council. So, through you,
02:02:36 Speaker 01: Madam Warden, thank you for the
02:02:38 Speaker 01: question. I was able to confirm
02:02:41 Speaker 01: with Director Spicer that our current
02:02:43 Speaker 01: ARL, including the full impact of
02:02:45 Speaker 01: the current ongoing work at Rockwood
02:02:47 Speaker 01: Terrace, is around about the seven
02:02:49 Speaker 01: percent mark. Yes, seven percent. Okay.
02:02:54 Speaker 35: Other questions on this amendment? Okay,
02:02:57 Speaker 35: I don't. see any other comments
02:03:00 Speaker 35: or questions from regarding this amendment.
02:03:02 Speaker 35: So we are going to vote
02:03:05 Speaker 35: on the amendment that the motion
02:03:07 Speaker 35: be amended to strike the words
02:03:08 Speaker 35: "Gray County County Gray County's readiness
02:03:10 Speaker 35: to potentially develop the approved 62
02:03:11 Speaker 35: long-term care beds at Gray Gables,"
02:03:13 Speaker 35: and instead insert that the ministry
02:03:15 Speaker 35: request the minis that staff request
02:03:16 Speaker 35: the ministry to maintain the 62
02:03:19 Speaker 35: bed allocation and staff provide further
02:03:20 Speaker 35: information in 2027. We've heard it.
02:03:22 Speaker 35: We've discussed. it. It's been moved
02:03:24 Speaker 35: and seconded. There was a request
02:03:26 Speaker 35: for a recorded vote, Madam Clerk.
02:03:28 Speaker 35: Please proceed. So, thank you, Councillor
02:03:31 Speaker 35: Mackie is absent today, so that's
02:03:35 Speaker 35: been indicated on your sheet. Councillor
02:03:36 Speaker 35: McKay. In favour, Councillor Carlton. Opposed,
02:03:38 Speaker 35: Councillor Pringle. Opposed, Councillor Allwood. Opposed,
02:03:39 Speaker 35: Councillor Nielsen. Opposed, Councillor Patterson. Opposed,
02:03:42 Speaker 35: Councillor Dickert. In favour, Councillor Ketner.
02:03:44 Speaker 35: In favour, Councillor Kieveny. In favour,
02:03:45 Speaker 35: Councillor Body. In favour, Councillor Greg.
02:03:49 Speaker 35: In favour, Councillor Milne. In favour,
02:03:51 Speaker 35: Councillor Dobrine. Opposed, Gordon Matrosovs. Opposed,
02:03:53 Speaker 35: Councillor Hope. Opposed, Councillor Eccles. In
02:03:55 Speaker 35: favour, Councillor Hutchinson. In favour. So
02:03:57 Speaker 53: that motion was carried, forty-nine to
02:03:59 Speaker 53: forty-three. Okay, carried. So therefore, we're
02:04:01 Speaker 53: now going to have a look
02:04:02 Speaker 53: at Clause Two as it has
02:04:04 Speaker 53: been amended, and as that gets
02:04:12 Speaker 53: transposed into the. new clause two
02:04:14 Speaker 53: that we will now be voting
02:04:16 Speaker 53: on, I will look to the
02:04:21 Speaker 54: deputy CAO now to to review
02:04:23 Speaker 54: with us what happens if this
02:04:24 Speaker 54: motion carries, what happens if it
02:04:27 Speaker 54: fails, in terms of our response
02:04:36 Speaker 54: to the ministry and what happens
02:04:37 Speaker 54: after that. Thank you. So thank
02:04:40 Speaker 06: you, and to you, Madam Warden.
02:04:43 Speaker 06: So assuming this carries, we will
02:04:45 Speaker 06: respond to the survey on Monday,
02:04:47 Speaker 06: the twenty ninth. confirming that we're
02:04:49 Speaker 06: interested in using our sixty two
02:04:51 Speaker 06: bed allocation, but are unable to
02:04:52 Speaker 06: commit to what exactly that looks
02:04:54 Speaker 06: like and the timelines laid out.
02:04:57 Speaker 06: We will then await for the
02:04:59 Speaker 06: ministry to respond to us before
02:05:00 Speaker 06: coming back to county council to
02:05:02 Speaker 06: seek further direction on that one,
02:05:04 Speaker 06: which will will involve that follow
02:05:06 Speaker 06: up in twenty twenty seven. We
02:05:07 Speaker 06: anticipate to the ministry. At this
02:05:09 Speaker 06: point, I believe as as the
02:05:11 Speaker 06: CAO is indicated, it would be
02:05:14 Speaker 06: prudent to table the third and
02:05:16 Speaker 06: the fourth recommendations in the. report.
02:05:17 Speaker 06: If this motion passes, if this
02:05:20 Speaker 06: motion fails, then where does that
02:05:23 Speaker 06: put us in terms of the
02:05:25 Speaker 06: of actually responding to the report?
02:05:28 Speaker 06: I will look at the CAO.
02:05:29 Speaker 06: If you want to just just
02:05:31 Speaker 06: so people are clear what they're
02:05:32 Speaker 06: voting on. So I guess if
02:05:35 Speaker 06: if this amended motion were to
02:05:37 Speaker 06: fail, then we would need to
02:05:38 Speaker 06: still seek further direction from from
02:05:40 Speaker 06: committee in terms of responding to
02:05:41 Speaker 06: the survey, because at the state.
02:05:44 Speaker 06: Because at the stage, then we
02:05:46 Speaker 06: wouldn't have any direction in terms
02:05:48 Speaker 06: of how we were to respond
02:05:53 Speaker 06: to that deadline survey of the
02:05:56 Speaker 06: twenty ninth. Okay, so we're now
02:05:58 Speaker 06: back to discussing clause two as
02:06:00 Speaker 06: it has been amended. Discussion. Okay,
02:06:03 Speaker 06: I'm not seeing any further hands
02:06:06 Speaker 06: for discussion, so I'll call that
02:06:09 Speaker 06: vote. All those in favour. Okay,
02:06:12 Speaker 06: could you just keep your hands
02:06:15 Speaker 06: raised for? me? Okay, thank you.
02:06:18 Speaker 06: That motion is carried. Okay, so
02:06:20 Speaker 06: as per the recommendation from the
02:06:22 Speaker 06: CAO, it would be worthy of
02:06:25 Speaker 06: now tabling clause three and four
02:06:27 Speaker 06: because of the change that we've
02:06:30 Speaker 06: made to clause number two. And
02:06:32 Speaker 06: what I can do is I
02:06:35 Speaker 06: can put the call out for
02:06:39 Speaker 06: unanimous consent. Is there anyone that
02:06:41 Speaker 06: disagrees with tabling? Agrees with tabling
02:06:43 Speaker 06: clauses three and four for future
02:06:44 Speaker 06: discussion at a future point in
02:06:46 Speaker 06: time when we follow through with
02:06:51 Speaker 06: the decision we just made. Not
02:06:53 Speaker 06: seeing any hands up in dissent,
02:06:55 Speaker 06: Madam Clerk, so we can say
02:06:56 Speaker 09: that that is under unanimous consent
02:06:58 Speaker 09: that we are tabling clauses three
02:07:00 Speaker 09: and four. Okay, so with that,
02:07:01 Speaker 09: then thank you, Director Cornell, and
02:07:02 Speaker 09: thank you to our both Deputy
02:07:04 Speaker 09: and our CAO for your assistance
02:07:07 Speaker 09: in navigating us through that decision
02:07:09 Speaker 09: making, and we're just a
02:07:11 Speaker 09: little bit. ahead of. We only
02:07:13 Speaker 09: just recently had a break, so
02:07:14 Speaker 09: I'd like to at least see
02:07:16 Speaker 09: where we are in terms of
02:07:18 Speaker 09: doing items 7D first before lunch.
02:07:21 Speaker 09: Is a cold lunch, so it
02:07:22 Speaker 09: can wait a little bit for
02:07:23 Speaker 09: us. And so, with that, if
02:07:26 Speaker 09: I could please direct your attention
02:07:29 Speaker 09: to item 7D, and this is
02:07:31 Speaker 09: going to be introduced by Director
02:07:34 Speaker 09: Myers, and it reads that report
02:07:36 Speaker 09: EDTCCW 1125 Industrial Development Charges Holiday
02:07:38 Speaker 09: in quotation. Holiday in quotations be
02:07:40 Speaker 09: received, and that staff be directed
02:07:42 Speaker 09: to prepare the relevant amending bylaws
02:07:45 Speaker 09: that incorporate a reduction on the
02:07:47 Speaker 09: industrial portion of non-residential development charges
02:07:49 Speaker 09: to zero for 2025 and 2026,
02:07:51 Speaker 09: and bring forward for council's
02:07:52 Speaker 09: consideration that staff be directed to
02:07:55 Speaker 09: return any funds collected since 2025
02:07:57 Speaker 09: in the payment for industrial development
02:07:58 Speaker 09: charges, which as of July 30th,
02:07:59 Speaker 09: 2025, was estimated. to be less
02:08:01 Speaker 09: than 25,000, and that staff be
02:08:03 Speaker 09: directed to start the 2026 development
02:08:06 Speaker 09: charges bylaw review process before year
02:08:08 Speaker 09: end, and to fund any expenditures
02:08:11 Speaker 09: in 2025 from the development charges
02:08:13 Speaker 09: general government reserve. May I ask
02:08:15 Speaker 09: for mover and seconder? Okay, that's
02:08:18 Speaker 09: moved by Councillor Body, seconded by
02:08:20 Speaker 09: Councillor Eccles. It's now on
02:08:23 Speaker 09: the floor for discussion. Welcome, Director
02:08:24 Speaker 09: Myers. Thank you very much, Warden.
02:08:27 Speaker 09: Thank you very much, Warren.
02:08:29 Speaker 09: And through you, good afternoon, County
02:08:30 Speaker 09: Council. It's officially twelve o'clock, so
02:08:32 Speaker 09: we are in the afternoon. Nile
02:08:33 Speaker 09: and I are going to tag
02:08:35 Speaker 09: team this report with you, but
02:08:38 Speaker 09: I do want to mention that
02:08:41 Speaker 09: this was really a team
02:08:42 Speaker 09: effort between Randy and Scott and
02:08:45 Speaker 09: Nile and I across departmental discussion
02:08:48 Speaker 09: to get us here today. As
02:08:51 Speaker 09: you know, non-residential development charges—they were
02:08:52 Speaker 09: introduced for the very first time
02:08:54 Speaker 09: in the current bylaw that we
02:08:56 Speaker 09: have right now. So in
02:08:58 Speaker 09: 2021, they were approved and they
02:09:01 Speaker 09: took effect on January. first, twenty
02:09:04 Speaker 09: twenty two, because these were brand
02:09:06 Speaker 09: new charges. They've been in a
02:09:09 Speaker 09: phased and approach over this time,
02:09:11 Speaker 09: beginning in January twenty twenty three.
02:09:12 Speaker 09: At that time, the significant economic
02:09:15 Speaker 09: pressures that we're seeing politically in
02:09:17 Speaker 09: our environment, tariff threats, none of
02:09:20 Speaker 09: that was predicted, and the pressures
02:09:21 Speaker 09: of the pandemic and post pandemic
02:09:23 Speaker 09: recovery were not truly understood at
02:09:28 Speaker 09: that time either. We're seeing that
02:09:29 Speaker 09: play out today. Through approval
02:09:32 Speaker 09: and implementation of the corporate strategy.
02:09:34 Speaker 09: Implementation of the corporate strategic plan
02:09:35 Speaker 09: and the economic development, tourism, and
02:09:36 Speaker 09: culture master plan. County Council has
02:09:37 Speaker 09: prioritized economic development and investment readiness
02:09:39 Speaker 09: across the county, focused first and
02:09:41 Speaker 09: foremost on the businesses that we
02:09:43 Speaker 09: have here today, who have already
02:09:44 Speaker 09: invested in our community, and then
02:09:46 Speaker 09: looking at business that could be
02:09:47 Speaker 09: attracted and welcoming new investment to
02:09:50 Speaker 09: this region. So today, the economic
02:09:51 Speaker 09: environment is shifted dramatically. The market
02:09:52 Speaker 09: is in a state of perpetual
02:09:55 Speaker 09: uncertainty. There's instability due to these
02:09:57 Speaker 09: global forces of the pandemic. and
02:09:59 Speaker 09: tariff threats, so in this environment
02:10:02 Speaker 09: particularly, our competitive advantage is being
02:10:04 Speaker 09: challenged. Locally, it is not a
02:10:06 Speaker 09: new conversation to you either that
02:10:08 Speaker 09: Gray County lacks significant investment-ready lands.
02:10:09 Speaker 09: That is something that we are
02:10:10 Speaker 09: working on through multiple different projects
02:10:12 Speaker 09: right now. But this lack of
02:10:13 Speaker 09: supply further compounds the competitiveness of
02:10:17 Speaker 09: Gray County for industrial growth and
02:10:20 Speaker 09: new industrial establishment. So while there's
02:10:22 Speaker 09: little evidence that suggests development charges
02:10:24 Speaker 09: create a financial barrier. for industry
02:10:26 Speaker 09: to invest or to develop as
02:10:28 Speaker 09: a whole. These are
02:10:30 Speaker 09: costs that are within our control
02:10:31 Speaker 09: as a municipality, whereas other costs
02:10:34 Speaker 09: of development are beyond our control.
02:10:36 Speaker 09: So within the current development environment,
02:10:38 Speaker 09: seeking to proactively review these costs
02:10:40 Speaker 09: can support investment. It's a demonstration
02:10:43 Speaker 09: of something that the municipality can
02:10:44 Speaker 09: control in encouraging new investment in
02:10:46 Speaker 09: our region and growing that assessment.
02:10:49 Speaker 09: And you'll notice from that chart
02:10:51 Speaker 09: that's in. this report, what that
02:10:52 Speaker 09: difference looks like between the non-residential,
02:10:54 Speaker 09: the industrial only portion of that,
02:10:55 Speaker 09: and then the assessment that comes
02:10:58 Speaker 09: from these investments, whether they're expansion
02:10:59 Speaker 09: or attraction, they are significant. This
02:11:01 Speaker 09: conversation is coming to you today
02:11:03 Speaker 09: after multiple conversations with industry partners
02:11:05 Speaker 09: right across the county. Some who
02:11:06 Speaker 09: are here and have been here
02:11:07 Speaker 09: for a very long time, others
02:11:09 Speaker 09: who are looking at the county
02:11:10 Speaker 09: to come for a very first
02:11:11 Speaker 09: time. So in this current fiscal
02:11:12 Speaker 09: environment. a move such as a
02:11:19 Speaker 09: DC relief or a holiday, in
02:11:20 Speaker 09: this case, would be viewed as
02:11:22 Speaker 09: key in respect to investment decisions.
02:11:24 Speaker 09: And this is especially true when
02:11:26 Speaker 35: we're working to retain and expand
02:11:27 Speaker 35: the industry that we have here
02:11:28 Speaker 35: today. Many of whom are dealing
02:11:30 Speaker 35: with pressures from their home companies,
02:11:33 Speaker 35: who may be interprovincial or American
02:11:34 Speaker 35: parent companies, when trying to forecast
02:11:37 Speaker 35: their expansion opportunities and where it
02:11:38 Speaker 35: makes sense to do so. So,
02:11:39 Speaker 35: something like this may help tip
02:11:41 Speaker 35: the scales, as we would call
02:11:44 Speaker 35: it, in favour of long. As
02:11:46 Speaker 35: we would call it, in favour
02:11:48 Speaker 35: of long-term strategy and decisions being
02:11:51 Speaker 35: made here in Ontario and in
02:11:53 Speaker 35: Grey County specifically. We've looked across
02:11:55 Speaker 35: Western Ontario. We have a as
02:11:57 Speaker 35: group of all economic development directors
02:11:59 Speaker 35: from Western Ontario wardens, and we
02:12:00 Speaker 35: meet monthly. And we had a
02:12:03 Speaker 35: conversation about these charges. Nine of
02:12:04 Speaker 35: the fifteen counties currently have non-residential
02:12:06 Speaker 35: development charges in place for industrial
02:12:07 Speaker 35: development, similar to us. Five include
02:12:10 Speaker 35: an exemption policy, and others are
02:12:13 Speaker 35: under review right now, having the
02:12:15 Speaker 35: same conversations. Having same conversations, given
02:12:16 Speaker 35: the environment that we find ourselves
02:12:17 Speaker 35: in today, just a note
02:12:18 Speaker 35: as well before I turn it
02:12:21 Speaker 35: over to Nile that for our
02:12:22 Speaker 35: member municipalities who have these non-resident
02:12:23 Speaker 35: industrial charges, this is not an
02:12:25 Speaker 35: ask for you to make any
02:12:27 Speaker 35: adjustments locally. This is something that
02:12:30 Speaker 35: Gray County can do on behalf
02:12:32 Speaker 35: of all of our municipalities as
02:12:35 Speaker 35: a region to help spur investment
02:12:37 Speaker 35: readiness right across without a local
02:12:38 Speaker 35: impact to you in your ask.
02:12:40 Speaker 35: So I just wanted to take
02:12:42 Speaker 35: that off the table in case
02:12:45 Speaker 35: anyone's thinking we're going to. ask
02:12:47 Speaker 35: any municipalities for a match, that
02:12:50 Speaker 35: is not what is part of
02:12:51 Speaker 35: this ask. So I'm going to
02:12:53 Speaker 35: turn it over to Niall to
02:12:55 Speaker 35: talk about the how. So good
02:12:58 Speaker 35: morning, good afternoon. As we just
02:13:00 Speaker 35: pointed out, and thank you for
02:13:03 Speaker 35: the opportunity. If Savannah's the the
02:13:04 Speaker 35: salesperson, I'm the one that comes
02:13:07 Speaker 35: with the reality check at the
02:13:09 Speaker 35: back end of this. In some
02:13:10 Speaker 35: respects, so so waving or giving
02:13:12 Speaker 35: a break and a did a
02:13:14 Speaker 35: holiday for development charges doesn't come
02:13:16 Speaker 35: without cost. The the the numbers
02:13:20 Speaker 35: that we've collected over the last
02:13:21 Speaker 35: couple of years are embedded within
02:13:23 Speaker 35: the report. Seventeen thousand dollars, or
02:13:24 Speaker 35: just over seventeen thousand dollars in
02:13:27 Speaker 35: 2023, and 2024 was 79, just
02:13:28 Speaker 35: short of eighty thousand dollars in
02:13:29 Speaker 55: in in these charges that we've
02:13:31 Speaker 55: collected, and and we can't forget
02:13:33 Speaker 55: that that money comes in. So
02:13:34 Speaker 55: our bylaw has established both a
02:13:36 Speaker 55: development charge that we need to
02:13:38 Speaker 55: collect. It's also established the projects
02:13:40 Speaker 55: that we are aiming to achieve
02:13:42 Speaker 56: with with the money that is
02:13:44 Speaker 56: collected, and so. we do have
02:13:46 Speaker 56: to find that money from somewhere
02:13:48 Speaker 56: else to make those projects whole.
02:13:49 Speaker 56: We believe that that can be
02:13:50 Speaker 56: easily can be accommodated within the
02:13:53 Speaker 56: existing reserves that we're carrying, and
02:13:54 Speaker 56: a large piece of this work,
02:13:55 Speaker 57: as you'll see later on in
02:13:58 Speaker 57: the report, is around transportation infrastructure.
02:14:02 Speaker 57: And so we can we we
02:14:06 Speaker 57: don't believe that any projects need
02:14:08 Speaker 57: to be put on hold or
02:14:09 Speaker 26: deferred, that the funding is able
02:14:10 Speaker 26: to be relieved from other other
02:14:11 Speaker 26: funding sources for this two year
02:14:13 Speaker 26: term. As has been noted, we
02:14:14 Speaker 26: would advance. the the development of
02:14:20 Speaker 26: the next DC bylaw as quickly
02:14:26 Speaker 26: as possible, so that we're able
02:14:29 Speaker 26: to conclude this conversation. And these
02:14:32 Speaker 26: conversations are not new to council.
02:14:36 Speaker 26: You've you've experienced conversations around how
02:14:38 Speaker 26: we might be able to influence
02:14:39 Speaker 26: and enhance development opportunities, how we
02:14:41 Speaker 26: can increase the competitiveness, and development
02:14:43 Speaker 26: charges have been part of those
02:14:45 Speaker 26: conversations in in the past. And
02:14:48 Speaker 26: so, staff believe, as as was
02:14:50 Speaker 26: laid out earlier, we're able to
02:14:52 Speaker 26: provide this holiday. We we understand.
02:14:53 Speaker 26: from multiple businesses that this
02:14:55 Speaker 26: is something which would be helpful
02:14:57 Speaker 26: and attraction to Grey County, and
02:14:58 Speaker 26: so I'm here to stand in
02:15:00 Speaker 26: support of what's being put in
02:15:02 Speaker 26: front of you that we put
02:15:04 Speaker 26: forward this this holiday period and
02:15:08 Speaker 26: start the the next round of
02:15:09 Speaker 26: the charge studies and background work.
02:15:12 Speaker 26: Okay, thank you both. So I'll
02:15:13 Speaker 26: put it out to Council Committee.
02:15:15 Speaker 26: The whole members, do they have
02:15:17 Speaker 26: questions? We'll go to Councillor Body.
02:15:18 Speaker 26: I don't have a question, just
02:15:22 Speaker 26: a suggestion. I don't think it
02:15:25 Speaker 26: needs a Justin, I don't think
02:15:28 Speaker 26: it needs an amendment of the
02:15:31 Speaker 26: motion, but I would think it
02:15:32 Speaker 26: would be great if the county
02:15:34 Speaker 26: could write to every owner of
02:15:36 Speaker 26: industrial lands once, assuming this passes.
02:15:38 Speaker 26: Once this passes, to everyone that
02:15:39 Speaker 26: owns industrial lands, you know, fairly
02:15:44 Speaker 26: soon, tell them of this as
02:15:47 Speaker 26: a as a motivation, and so
02:15:50 Speaker 26: it doesn't wait to leak out
02:15:54 Speaker 07: that we actually get that message
02:15:56 Speaker 07: to people that need to hear
02:15:58 Speaker 07: it. Thanks. Thank you for that
02:16:03 Speaker 07: comment, and I agree. I don't
02:16:05 Speaker 07: think that needs to be embedded
02:16:06 Speaker 07: into the motion. And any other
02:16:07 Speaker 07: comments? We'll go to. Councillor Nielsen.
02:16:10 Speaker 07: It was a race, Councillor Greg.
02:16:13 Speaker 07: So going back again to yesterday's
02:16:14 Speaker 07: conversation about budget and finance, we
02:16:15 Speaker 07: look at ourselves as trying to
02:16:17 Speaker 07: how do we cover the costs
02:16:19 Speaker 07: and expansion of things we're trying
02:16:21 Speaker 07: to do. Development charges are put
02:16:24 Speaker 07: in place to help municipalities fund
02:16:27 Speaker 07: growth through growth by implementing the
02:16:29 Speaker 07: holiday here. We are, I understand,
02:16:32 Speaker 07: trying to get industrial lands built
02:16:33 Speaker 07: upon, but there's other avenues that
02:16:36 Speaker 07: make Great Highlands an attractive place.
02:16:38 Speaker 07: Land value being one of them.
02:16:39 Speaker 07: It's probably significantly less here than
02:16:40 Speaker 07: if, if you're trying to bank
02:16:42 Speaker 07: the same land in the GTA
02:16:44 Speaker 07: or other areas of Ontario. One
02:16:47 Speaker 07: of the things that, when I
02:16:48 Speaker 07: saw this report, I was interested
02:16:52 Speaker 07: to kind of hear a response.
02:16:54 Speaker 07: Both the provincial and federal governments
02:16:57 Speaker 07: elect. Provincial and federal government's election
02:16:58 Speaker 07: campaigns and comments talked about development
02:17:00 Speaker 07: charges. They talk about trying to
02:17:03 Speaker 07: get rid of them. However, both
02:17:09 Speaker 07: have also said about making municipalities
02:17:10 Speaker 07: whole. If we remove the development
02:17:13 Speaker 07: charge already preemptively, are we losing
02:17:16 Speaker 07: out on the opportunity if the
02:17:18 Speaker 07: province and feds try to shut
02:17:20 Speaker 07: us down? Are we losing an
02:17:21 Speaker 07: opportunity for money coming from them
02:17:23 Speaker 07: to cover the costs of the
02:17:25 Speaker 07: growth? We need to cover the
02:17:27 Speaker 07: bridges, transportation routes. Right. These are
02:17:29 Speaker 07: costs that we have. There's implications
02:17:31 Speaker 07: when it comes to losing development
02:17:33 Speaker 07: charges, and so I guess my
02:17:35 Speaker 07: main first question to staff is:
02:17:36 Speaker 07: Are we risking losing potential funds
02:17:38 Speaker 07: from both the province and feds
02:17:40 Speaker 07: who have committed to saying making
02:17:42 Speaker 07: us whole if the development charges
02:17:44 Speaker 07: are raised? Well, go to the
02:17:45 Speaker 07: C.A. I think I lost the
02:17:47 Speaker 07: rock paper scissors through you, Lord
02:17:48 Speaker 07: Mattresshops. Lord Matrissov's great question. At
02:17:50 Speaker 07: this stage, we have not heard
02:17:52 Speaker 07: how the province and federal government
02:17:54 Speaker 07: plans to keep keep municipalities whole
02:17:55 Speaker 07: based on any changes as a
02:17:57 Speaker 07: result of the Development Charges Act
02:17:59 Speaker 07: that we know have. There's been
02:18:01 Speaker 07: several changes over the last few
02:18:03 Speaker 07: years. What we have heard recently
02:18:05 Speaker 07: from the province is a bit
02:18:06 Speaker 07: of a change in approach and
02:18:09 Speaker 35: direction with respect to development charges,
02:18:11 Speaker 35: recognizing that there is a purpose
02:18:12 Speaker 35: for them, as Niall indicated. As
02:18:13 Speaker 35: Nile indicated, there is there there
02:18:14 Speaker 35: they help to fund those those
02:18:15 Speaker 35: growth related aspects. I think what
02:18:17 Speaker 35: staff are bringing for today is
02:18:18 Speaker 35: is a two for as part
02:18:19 Speaker 35: of the recommendation. Let's let's start
02:18:21 Speaker 35: the DC background study review as
02:18:22 Speaker 35: soon as we can because we
02:18:23 Speaker 35: think this is one aspect that
02:18:24 Speaker 35: we want to look at. But
02:18:26 Speaker 35: we also think this aligns as
02:18:27 Speaker 35: as Savannah noted with our strategic
02:18:28 Speaker 35: plan, our EDTC master plan. It's
02:18:32 Speaker 35: another potential layer that we can
02:18:34 Speaker 26: help to spur. further industrial development
02:18:38 Speaker 26: growth to help attract more employment
02:18:39 Speaker 26: opportunities within Grey County. That's going
02:18:40 Speaker 26: to be fundamental as we look
02:18:41 Speaker 26: at our demographics and as we
02:18:44 Speaker 26: look at our growth projections. We're
02:18:48 Speaker 26: going to need workforce age population
02:18:50 Speaker 26: coming into our communities in order
02:18:54 Speaker 26: to sustain our communities. And this,
02:18:56 Speaker 26: we think, is just one one
02:18:59 Speaker 26: added bonus layer that we can
02:19:00 Speaker 26: potentially offer that's in our control,
02:19:06 Speaker 26: in our sphere of control at
02:19:08 Speaker 26: this moment, to be able to
02:19:10 Speaker 26: help spur some of that, and
02:19:11 Speaker 26: that's why we're putting forward both
02:19:12 Speaker 26: the recommendation to to look at
02:19:15 Speaker 26: this as a recommended holiday, but
02:19:16 Speaker 26: let's advance the DC backward studying
02:19:19 Speaker 26: work now, especially given that 2026
02:19:20 Speaker 26: is an election year, so we
02:19:22 Speaker 26: we're on tighter windows as well.
02:19:23 Speaker 26: So this will allow us staff
02:19:25 Speaker 26: to be able to put out
02:19:26 Speaker 26: the RFP, hire a consultant, and
02:19:28 Speaker 26: hit the ground running right at
02:19:29 Speaker 26: the beginning of Jan. one twenty
02:19:31 Speaker 26: twenty six, with the DC background
02:19:33 Speaker 26: study, so that we can analyse
02:19:36 Speaker 26: not just this component but all
02:19:37 Speaker 26: the components of our DC background
02:19:40 Speaker 26: study. Hopefully, by then, we may
02:19:42 Speaker 26: have some further information from the
02:19:45 Speaker 26: province and federal government in terms
02:19:46 Speaker 26: of how they anticipate to keep
02:19:47 Speaker 26: us whole. But at this stage,
02:19:49 Speaker 26: our recommendation is to to put
02:19:51 Speaker 26: forward that holiday. I see. Nile
02:19:54 Speaker 26: may have some further comments through
02:19:56 Speaker 26: you, Warden. So, through you, Warden,
02:19:58 Speaker 26: thank you for that, and thank
02:19:59 Speaker 26: you for giving me my brain
02:20:00 Speaker 26: a chance to catch up. So,
02:20:01 Speaker 26: the benefit of the holiday is
02:20:03 Speaker 26: when. So the benefit of the
02:20:04 Speaker 26: holiday is we're not actually rewriting
02:20:05 Speaker 26: the bylaw, so the charges still
02:20:07 Speaker 26: actually exist in the bylaw. So
02:20:08 Speaker 26: if we ever did have a
02:20:09 Speaker 26: conversation, they're still embedded. We still
02:20:11 Speaker 26: have the support in terms of
02:20:13 Speaker 26: the need. We still have the
02:20:16 Speaker 26: support in terms of the level,
02:20:18 Speaker 26: the amount of the money that
02:20:19 Speaker 26: needs to be collected. This is
02:20:23 Speaker 26: just a holiday that's been offered
02:20:25 Speaker 26: temporarily. So, thank you very much,
02:20:28 Speaker 36: Mr. Word Microsoft, for a chance
02:20:30 Speaker 36: to respond. So for for one,
02:20:32 Speaker 36: the as far as I understand
02:20:35 Speaker 36: it, because Great Highlands did the
02:20:39 Speaker 07: same thing, we did a development
02:20:41 Speaker 07: charges holiday for residential bills to.
02:20:46 Speaker 07: For residential builds to encourage residential
02:20:47 Speaker 07: building, as you stated, the county
02:20:50 Speaker 07: itself will have to fund those
02:20:53 Speaker 07: costs. If the DC charge holiday
02:20:55 Speaker 07: goes through, and you see a
02:20:57 Speaker 07: spur in the next eighteen months
02:21:00 Speaker 07: to the end of when this
02:21:02 Speaker 07: DC policy or or charges plan
02:21:04 Speaker 07: and cycles over to the next
02:21:06 Speaker 07: one, all the money that has
02:21:07 Speaker 07: that comes in will have to
02:21:09 Speaker 07: be recouped and. recovered somewhere within
02:21:12 Speaker 07: the county, be it from one-time
02:21:16 Speaker 07: funding or something. We have to
02:21:19 Speaker 07: pay ourselves that money. So there's
02:21:20 Speaker 07: part of me that thinks if
02:21:23 Speaker 07: this is the direction county wants
02:21:25 Speaker 07: to go, wait till the end
02:21:26 Speaker 07: of the development charge study, or
02:21:28 Speaker 07: do this as part of the
02:21:29 Speaker 07: next study to remove this industrial,
02:21:32 Speaker 07: so that we're not trying to
02:21:34 Speaker 07: then pay ourselves because that's what
02:21:36 Speaker 07: we'll have to do. If some
02:21:38 Speaker 07: large-scale industrial development happens, Gray County
02:21:39 Speaker 07: is going to have to pay
02:21:44 Speaker 07: itself that money because the policy
02:21:46 Speaker 07: exists. One, two. I also find
02:21:48 Speaker 07: it interesting that the one cycle
02:21:53 Speaker 07: when this got introduced, we're not
02:21:55 Speaker 36: even finished that cycle, and we're
02:21:57 Speaker 36: already saying we want this out.
02:22:00 Speaker 36: And so it seems like there
02:22:03 Speaker 36: must have been cause, justification, and
02:22:09 Speaker 36: reasoning why this development charge got
02:22:12 Speaker 36: put into the study and the
02:22:14 Speaker 36: plan in the first place. And
02:22:16 Speaker 36: we're not even through that cycle,
02:22:18 Speaker 36: and we're saying let's hurry up
02:22:20 Speaker 36: and get the cycle started so
02:22:23 Speaker 36: that we can remove it because
02:22:25 Speaker 36: we did we didn't like what
02:22:27 Speaker 36: we did. So part of me
02:22:29 Speaker 36: is, have we given the chance
02:22:31 Speaker 36: to? Have we given it the
02:22:34 Speaker 36: chance to do what it's supposed
02:22:37 Speaker 36: to do, which is to help
02:22:39 Speaker 36: raise development charges to fund the
02:22:43 Speaker 36: growth? And part of it is
02:22:46 Speaker 36: the potential cost somewhere in
02:22:48 Speaker 36: the county to recoup the funds
02:22:52 Speaker 36: that we're going to set up.
02:22:54 Speaker 36: Okay, thank you. So a little
02:22:56 Speaker 36: bit of Councillor Greg next. Glad
02:22:58 Speaker 36: to speak. I don't know if
02:23:03 Speaker 36: the CAO wanted to hit his
02:23:09 Speaker 36: hand up before I speak. Okay,
02:23:11 Speaker 36: CAO before Councillor Greg. Thank you,
02:23:13 Speaker 36: Lord Matrissovs, and and just to
02:23:16 Speaker 36: to reemphasize what I think Director
02:23:19 Speaker 36: Myers indicated earlier, you know, at
02:23:20 Speaker 36: the time when we were introducing
02:23:22 Speaker 36: and discussing a new non-residential charge,
02:23:24 Speaker 36: which as as Savannah noted is
02:23:25 Speaker 36: is our first crack at this,
02:23:26 Speaker 36: as part of this, we we
02:23:30 Speaker 36: didn't know the outcomes of of
02:23:32 Speaker 36: what the pandemic and and what
02:23:34 Speaker 36: we were anticipating and see in
02:23:35 Speaker 36: terms of construction costs. We also
02:23:37 Speaker 36: did not anticipate some. of the
02:23:40 Speaker 36: stuff that's happening south of our
02:23:42 Speaker 36: border with respect to the economic
02:23:44 Speaker 36: uncertainty that's been created by tariff
02:23:46 Speaker 36: threats, etc. So, so given the
02:23:48 Speaker 36: current fiscal environment, given that we're
02:23:50 Speaker 36: trying to help spur some further
02:23:52 Speaker 36: industrial employment and growth again through
02:23:54 Speaker 36: our through our work of our
02:23:55 Speaker 36: economic development team, as well as
02:23:56 Speaker 36: all the member municipalities through part
02:23:59 Speaker 36: of what we call Team Gray,
02:24:03 Speaker 36: our recommendation is to to implement
02:24:06 Speaker 36: this holiday at this. point in
02:24:07 Speaker 20: time, and then, but revisit it
02:24:11 Speaker 20: and review it as part of
02:24:14 Speaker 20: the DC background study work, almost
02:24:18 Speaker 20: in parallel. Okay, over to Councillor
02:24:23 Speaker 20: Gray. Thank you, and through you,
02:24:27 Speaker 20: Warden. Really good comments, Councillor Nielsen.
02:24:32 Speaker 20: Mayor Body would likely support the
02:24:36 Speaker 20: fact I am not a supporter
02:24:37 Speaker 20: of the development charges at all,
02:24:41 Speaker 20: and have demonstrated that several times.
02:24:43 Speaker 20: at the lower tier municipality, but
02:24:46 Speaker 20: I think the the time to
02:24:50 Speaker 20: really the exactness is when you're
02:24:52 Speaker 20: doing the study, and once you've
02:24:56 Speaker 20: adopted the study, that's the template
02:24:58 Speaker 20: that everyone has to follow. And
02:25:01 Speaker 20: one missing line that hasn't been
02:25:04 Speaker 20: spoken yet to is in the
02:25:06 Speaker 20: last couple years, or 23 to
02:25:11 Speaker 20: 24, we're up about 4.5 times
02:25:12 Speaker 20: in terms of the DC revenue.
02:25:13 Speaker 20: so there is a multitude of
02:25:14 Speaker 20: competitive factors that exist in the
02:25:17 Speaker 35: marketplace, and the pandemic—it's way behind
02:25:19 Speaker 35: everyone now. So we don't want
02:25:20 Speaker 35: to look. I mean, ninety-five point
02:25:23 Speaker 35: two three percent of the development
02:25:25 Speaker 35: charges collected from industrial use are
02:25:27 Speaker 35: going to road and related work.
02:25:28 Speaker 35: We don't have to replace our
02:25:30 Speaker 35: roads or our bridges, which are
02:25:32 Speaker 35: engineered for load capacities. for Honda
02:25:34 Speaker 35: Civics, for Toyota Corollas, or GMC
02:25:35 Speaker 35: Sonomas. There, we and we have
02:25:38 Speaker 35: these huge costs that we have
02:25:40 Speaker 35: to undertake, which are driven by
02:25:46 Speaker 35: large vehicular traffic and trucks, and
02:25:50 Speaker 35: they service exactly what this conversation
02:25:52 Speaker 35: is about today. So it's not
02:25:53 Speaker 35: a large dollar, but I think
02:25:55 Speaker 21: it is something that just needs
02:25:58 Speaker 21: to stay in here. We decided
02:25:59 Speaker 21: as a council that's that's the
02:26:01 Speaker 21: template. and that's what they're used
02:26:10 Speaker 21: for. Ninety-five point two three percent
02:26:14 Speaker 21: contributes to your roads, and if
02:26:16 Speaker 21: it's not there, then that ninety-five
02:26:17 Speaker 21: point two three percent, or twenty-four
02:26:22 Speaker 21: seventy-nine thousand and change, is paid
02:26:25 Speaker 21: for by the driver of the
02:26:28 Speaker 07: Sonoma, or the driver of the
02:26:31 Speaker 07: Civic, or the driver of the
02:26:33 Speaker 07: Corolla. So I think they are
02:26:36 Speaker 07: purposeful. Once council has decided they're
02:26:38 Speaker 07: in there, and I think I
02:26:43 Speaker 06: don't think we should be supporting
02:26:44 Speaker 06: this. We take another look at
02:26:46 Speaker 06: it when the time. the cycle
02:26:48 Speaker 06: goes through, looking at the DCs.
02:26:49 Speaker 06: Okay, thank you. We'll go to
02:26:51 Speaker 06: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, and through
02:26:59 Speaker 06: you, thank you. I know that
02:27:01 Speaker 06: we recently didn't support a subclass
02:27:02 Speaker 06: for affordable housing, and I'm not
02:27:03 Speaker 06: certain that we are waiving the
02:27:05 Speaker 06: development charges for affordable builds. Just
02:27:06 Speaker 06: comparing apples to oranges, and reducing
02:27:08 Speaker 06: the development charges ultimately comes at
02:27:12 Speaker 06: a cost, going to be a
02:27:14 Speaker 06: burden on the taxpayer. Would it
02:27:15 Speaker 06: be better, rather than to waive
02:27:17 Speaker 06: the DCS entirely, but to defer
02:27:20 Speaker 06: the DCS for industrial development pending
02:27:22 Speaker 06: the DC study that we're going
02:27:27 Speaker 58: to undertake, that they could. be
02:27:28 Speaker 58: waived or waived at the at
02:27:29 Speaker 58: the conclusion of that, or entered
02:27:31 Speaker 58: into a payment plan, as opposed
02:27:46 Speaker 58: to not collecting them at all
02:27:48 Speaker 58: now or in the future. So,
02:28:31 Speaker 58: for you, Madam Warden, and thank
02:28:32 Speaker 58: you for the question. Either one
02:28:34 Speaker 58: of us could have taken that
02:28:35 Speaker 58: one. I think this is around
02:28:37 Speaker 58: trying to provide some certainty in
02:28:38 Speaker 58: the landscape, and so one of
02:28:41 Speaker 27: the challenges with a deferral is.
02:28:43 Speaker 27: a business that might be interested
02:28:44 Speaker 27: in developing if there was no
02:28:46 Speaker 27: DC versus a business that was
02:28:48 Speaker 27: not too worried wouldn't know what
02:28:51 Speaker 27: their future costs would be with
02:28:54 Speaker 27: a deferral. So, if we were
02:28:55 Speaker 27: simply pushing this down the line,
02:28:58 Speaker 27: it doesn't necessarily send the same
02:28:59 Speaker 27: message that we're investment ready as
02:29:02 Speaker 27: the as the holiday that we're
02:29:05 Speaker 27: proposing. Okay, not seeing any further
02:29:10 Speaker 27: hands. Okay. Their hands. Okay, so
02:29:12 Speaker 27: we're ready. Then we will call
02:29:13 Speaker 27: the question. It's been moved and
02:29:16 Speaker 27: seconded and discussed. All those in
02:29:18 Speaker 27: favour? Okay. I think I'm going
02:29:20 Speaker 27: to do a count here. Can
02:29:21 Speaker 27: you just keep keep your hands
02:29:24 Speaker 27: raised, please? And all those opposed?
02:29:26 Speaker 27: And so that motion is defeated.
02:29:26 Speaker 27: Okay. And let me just look
02:29:31 Speaker 59: to the CAO in terms of
02:29:38 Speaker 59: next steps. Thank you. Through you,
02:29:40 Speaker 59: Board of Trustees, the the final
02:29:44 Speaker 59: clause in that that motion to
02:29:47 Speaker 59: advance the DC background study review,
02:29:49 Speaker 59: I was wondering if if Council
02:29:50 Speaker 59: may entertain that that clause, that
02:29:56 Speaker 59: motion, so we can advance the
02:29:58 Speaker 59: DC review as soon as possible.
02:30:00 Speaker 59: Okay, I'm just going to confirm
02:30:04 Speaker 59: with the clerk because we have
02:30:07 Speaker 01: technically voted that down because we've
02:30:10 Speaker 01: already voted. it down. So, do
02:30:13 Speaker 01: you need a two thirds majority
02:30:16 Speaker 01: to revisit that single clause? Okay.
02:30:20 Speaker 01: So, the clerk is advising that
02:30:21 Speaker 01: there is something that can be
02:30:23 Speaker 01: done in terms of that. So,
02:30:26 Speaker 01: we don't. So, we can consider
02:30:28 Speaker 01: that separately, but just not at
02:30:33 Speaker 01: this point in time. So, we'll
02:30:35 Speaker 01: have a further conversation. We'll return
02:30:37 Speaker 01: to it. Okay. And remembering that
02:30:38 Speaker 01: this is committee, the whole. So,
02:30:42 Speaker 01: we do have council coming. up
02:30:46 Speaker 01: in two weeks' time. So, okay.
02:30:47 Speaker 01: So with that, then that concludes
02:30:49 Speaker 01: this matter. After lunch, oh, sorry,
02:30:52 Speaker 01: Councillor Body. Could we not just
02:30:55 Speaker 01: put a motion on the floor
02:30:57 Speaker 01: right now to reconsider, get our
02:31:00 Speaker 01: two-thirds vote, and move ahead with
02:31:02 Speaker 01: that? Just a minute, please. We're
02:31:06 Speaker 01: just conferring on process. Okay, thank
02:31:09 Speaker 01: you very much. As we navigate
02:31:11 Speaker 01: our way through the intricacies, and
02:31:13 Speaker 01: and yes, we just wanted to
02:31:16 Speaker 01: know in terms of the timing.
02:31:18 Speaker 01: And as I mentioned, this is
02:31:21 Speaker 01: committee the whole, so anything can
02:31:22 Speaker 01: be pulled and reconsidered can be.
02:31:25 Speaker 36: Considered can be discut. I don't
02:31:27 Speaker 36: want to use that word. Reconsider
02:31:29 Speaker 36: can be discussed further and voted
02:31:32 Speaker 36: on at council. However, there is
02:31:35 Speaker 36: a pathway. A motion could be
02:31:37 Speaker 36: made to to reconsider. It would
02:31:39 Speaker 36: require a two thirds vote, and
02:31:42 Speaker 36: then we could then open that
02:31:43 Speaker 36: topic back up again for a
02:31:46 Speaker 36: singular vote on that specific item.
02:31:53 Speaker 36: So, Councillor Body, is that your
02:32:03 Speaker 36: wish? I was on the losing
02:32:07 Speaker 36: end. Yep. Yeah, good point. So
02:32:11 Speaker 20: he's just—he's just confirmed it does
02:32:14 Speaker 20: need to be somebody that actually
02:32:18 Speaker 20: voted on the winning side. So
02:32:21 Speaker 20: okay. So I saw Councillor Eccles'
02:32:23 Speaker 20: hand go up, and I saw
02:32:25 Speaker 20: Councillor Nielsen's hand second. So it
02:32:28 Speaker 20: is being Councillor Eccles. Can you
02:32:32 Speaker 20: just articulate for the clerk what
02:32:39 Speaker 20: it is that you're moving? Move
02:32:41 Speaker 20: to reconsider the previous motion. Well,
02:32:42 Speaker 20: I can't get that. I've got
02:32:43 Speaker 20: to. reconsider the motion. Put it
02:32:48 Speaker 20: back onto the table. Then we
02:32:50 Speaker 20: might be able to split it.
02:32:55 Speaker 20: But the reconsider, I've got to
02:32:58 Speaker 20: put get the whole motion reconsidered.
02:33:00 Speaker 20: Yeah. Okay. The clerk is advising
02:33:02 Speaker 20: it is possible just to open
02:33:05 Speaker 20: up clause four for reconsideration. Okay,
02:33:09 Speaker 20: and I'll just confirm with the
02:33:10 Speaker 20: seconder, seconder, Councillor Nielsen. Secondary, Councillor
02:33:14 Speaker 20: Nielsen, you are. Yep. Okay. So,
02:33:18 Speaker 20: this will require require a two
02:33:19 Speaker 20: thirds vote that we reconsider. Open
02:33:24 Speaker 20: for reconsideration, item four. And Madam
02:33:25 Speaker 60: Clerk, we're just going to vote
02:33:29 Speaker 60: on reconsidering. Then, if there's two
02:33:31 Speaker 60: thirds vote, then we discuss the
02:33:33 Speaker 60: actual clause itself and vote on
02:33:35 Speaker 60: the actual clause itself. Okay. Great.
02:33:38 Speaker 60: And and because yeah. Okay. So
02:33:41 Speaker 60: with. that, I'm going to call
02:33:45 Speaker 60: the vote then for reconsideration of
02:33:47 Speaker 60: clause four only reconsideration. How many
02:33:49 Speaker 60: are in favour? Okay. Well, there
02:33:54 Speaker 60: you go. I didn't have to
02:33:56 Speaker 60: do much counting there. So that
02:33:58 Speaker 60: that passes, Madam Clerk. So now
02:34:00 Speaker 60: we are going to entertain that
02:34:03 Speaker 60: staff be directed to start the
02:34:05 Speaker 07: 2026 development charges bylaw review process
02:34:06 Speaker 07: before year end and to fund
02:34:09 Speaker 07: any expenditures in 2025. from the
02:34:13 Speaker 07: development charges general government reserve, so
02:34:15 Speaker 07: that stands on its own. It's
02:34:18 Speaker 07: been moved by Councillor Dobrine, seconded
02:34:20 Speaker 07: by Councillor Carleton. Any discussion on
02:34:23 Speaker 07: that? Yes, Councillor. We'll go to
02:34:24 Speaker 07: Councillor Gregg and then to Councillor
02:34:26 Speaker 07: Dobrine. Thank you. And I don't
02:34:27 Speaker 07: think it's prudent that Council supports
02:34:29 Speaker 07: that. That was part of a
02:34:31 Speaker 07: motion that was defeated by Council
02:34:33 Speaker 07: just minutes ago, and in moving
02:34:34 Speaker 07: forward with. such action, you're effectively
02:34:38 Speaker 07: just spending monies in 2025 that
02:34:39 Speaker 07: were never budgeted to be spent
02:34:41 Speaker 07: in 2025, and it's just brought
02:34:43 Speaker 07: before you as the result of
02:34:45 Speaker 07: a losing motion. Where it belongs
02:34:47 Speaker 07: is in 2026 budget considerations. Okay,
02:34:52 Speaker 07: we'll go to Councillor Debrine. Thank
02:34:55 Speaker 07: you, thank you, and through you,
02:34:56 Speaker 61: I am supportive of beginning the
02:34:59 Speaker 01: process. We are scheduled to do
02:35:00 Speaker 01: a development charges review in 2026.
02:35:03 Speaker 01: Therefore, the monies would be budgeted
02:35:05 Speaker 01: or allocated in order to do
02:35:07 Speaker 01: that study. We're required to
02:35:09 Speaker 01: do that study starting in 2026.
02:35:11 Speaker 01: This is a matter of three
02:35:14 Speaker 01: months advance, and perhaps through the
02:35:16 Speaker 01: process we have to go through
02:35:19 Speaker 01: an RFP. We have to do
02:35:21 Speaker 01: all of that. We may not
02:35:23 Speaker 01: even start it until twenty twenty
02:35:26 Speaker 01: six. I am confident that we
02:35:27 Speaker 01: would be doing this anyway. We've
02:35:29 Speaker 01: we've advanced road projects in for
02:35:30 Speaker 01: four hundred. five hundred thousand dollars
02:35:32 Speaker 01: that were earmarked for twenty twenty
02:35:35 Speaker 01: six, and moved them up to
02:35:40 Speaker 01: twenty twenty five because it made
02:35:41 Speaker 01: sense to do so. Okay, thank
02:35:43 Speaker 01: you. Any other comments? We'll go
03:21:25 Speaker 01: to Councillor Ackles. Just for clarification,
03:21:27 Speaker 01: this motion that's here is that
03:21:28 Speaker 01: it comes out of the development
03:21:30 Speaker 01: charges general reserve to do this.
03:21:34 Speaker 01: That's how these are always financed.
03:21:36 Speaker 01: so even if it was put
03:21:38 Speaker 01: into the 2026 budget, it would
03:21:40 Speaker 01: be the revenue to offset
03:21:43 Speaker 01: this expenditure. Would be coming from
03:21:45 Speaker 01: this reserve anyway, so it doesn't
03:21:48 Speaker 01: have an effect. Whether it's on
03:21:51 Speaker 01: 2025 or 2026, comes out of
03:21:53 Speaker 01: the development charges, the expenditures from
03:21:56 Speaker 01: there. Am I correct? And that
03:21:58 Speaker 01: through you, Warden, that is correct.
03:22:00 Speaker 01: the The funding source for the
03:22:02 Speaker 01: development charges review would be from
03:22:04 Speaker 01: the development charges general government reserve.
03:22:06 Speaker 01: Just a note as well, and
03:22:08 Speaker 01: I think the bulk of the
03:22:10 Speaker 01: work will still be in 2026.
03:22:13 Speaker 01: What this allows, because we anticipate,
03:22:15 Speaker 01: say, the 2026 budget may not
03:22:17 Speaker 01: be approved by bylaw until say
03:22:19 Speaker 01: January of 2026. What this allows
03:22:20 Speaker 01: us to do would be to
03:22:22 Speaker 01: advance the RFP work, starting setting
03:22:25 Speaker 01: up. the terms of reference for
03:22:26 Speaker 01: the steering committee so that we
03:22:34 Speaker 01: can hit the ground running come
03:22:36 Speaker 01: January first, twenty twenty six, with
03:22:37 Speaker 01: the DC review. So that's what
03:22:39 Speaker 01: we're anticipating as staff. It buys
03:22:41 Speaker 62: us that two three month period
03:22:43 Speaker 62: that we would otherwise lose in
03:22:45 Speaker 62: the early part of twenty twenty
03:22:48 Speaker 62: six by doing all that work
03:22:51 Speaker 62: come when the budget is actually
03:22:54 Speaker 62: approved. So that's why staff
03:22:56 Speaker 62: are recommending to still proceed with
03:22:59 Speaker 62: that particular clause in this motion.
03:23:01 Speaker 62: Okay, and. Okay. Any other discussion?
03:23:02 Speaker 62: Okay. So I'll just read it
03:23:05 Speaker 62: out. Then we are now voting
03:23:07 Speaker 62: on that staff be directed to
03:23:09 Speaker 62: start the 2026 development charges bylaw
03:23:11 Speaker 62: review process before year end, and
03:23:13 Speaker 62: to fund any expenditures in 2025
03:23:15 Speaker 62: from the development charges general government
03:23:17 Speaker 62: reserve. It's been discussed, moved, seconded.
03:23:19 Speaker 62: All those in favour? And that
03:23:22 Speaker 62: motion is carried. Okay. Thank you.
03:23:24 Speaker 62: So that concludes that particular item,
03:23:25 Speaker 62: and that allows us. then to
03:23:27 Speaker 62: pause for lunch, and then afterwards
03:23:29 Speaker 62: we have two. We have one
03:23:31 Speaker 62: more for discussion. Then we need
03:23:33 Speaker 62: to revisit one item from six,
03:23:36 Speaker 62: and then moved move into closed
03:23:38 Speaker 62: session for two other items. So
03:23:40 Speaker 62: we will adjourn then, Madam Clerk,
03:23:42 Speaker 62: to reconvene at yeah at one
03:23:44 Speaker 62: fifteen. So we'll look to have
03:23:48 Speaker 62: everybody back here at the horseshoe
03:23:50 Speaker 62: at one fifteen. Thank you. Okay.
03:23:52 Speaker 62: welcome back, County Council. We are
03:23:54 Speaker 62: going to continue with our open
03:23:55 Speaker 62: session agenda, and for committee of
03:23:58 Speaker 62: the whole. And next up, we
03:24:02 Speaker 62: have item seven E, and it
03:24:04 Speaker 62: is recommended that report E D
03:24:07 Speaker 62: T C C W zero nine
03:24:09 Speaker 62: twenty five regarding Ontario Transit Investment
03:24:11 Speaker 62: Funding (OTIF), known as OTIF grant,
03:24:13 Speaker 62: be received, and that staff include
03:24:16 Speaker 62: the anticipated 2026 county levy requirement
03:24:18 Speaker 62: of one hundred and forty five
03:24:19 Speaker 62: thousand dollars in. the 2026 draft
03:24:21 Speaker 62: budget for council consideration, and that
03:24:23 Speaker 62: the clerk, the warden, and clerk
03:24:26 Speaker 62: be authorised to sign the transfer
03:24:27 Speaker 62: payment agreement, the TPA, and that
03:24:28 Speaker 62: the warden and clerk be authorised
03:24:30 Speaker 62: to sign the applicable partnership agreements
03:24:32 Speaker 62: with the partners of Bruce County,
03:24:35 Speaker 62: Dauphin County, and Soggy Mobility and
03:24:37 Speaker 62: Regional Transit, also known as SMART.
03:24:39 Speaker 62: And we will be having Manager
03:24:40 Speaker 62: Stewart will be introducing that topic.
03:24:43 Speaker 62: But first of all, let's put
03:24:47 Speaker 62: it on the floor for discussion.
03:24:48 Speaker 62: moved by Councillor Hutchinson and seconded
03:24:50 Speaker 62: by Councillor Kibanyi. It's now on
03:24:53 Speaker 62: the floor for discussion. Welcome, Manager
03:24:55 Speaker 62: Stewart. Thank you, Your Worship. Good
03:24:57 Speaker 62: afternoon, Council. I'm pleased to be
03:24:59 Speaker 62: here today to provide an update
03:25:00 Speaker 62: on the exciting progress we're making
03:25:04 Speaker 62: towards understanding the potential development of
03:25:05 Speaker 62: a unified regional transit network across
03:25:07 Speaker 62: Grey County, Bruce County, Dufferin County,
03:25:09 Speaker 62: and in partnership with Saugeen Mobility.
03:25:11 Speaker 62: Sawgine Mobility. This initiative builds on
03:25:14 Speaker 62: previous transit planning efforts, leveraging past
03:25:16 Speaker 62: insights and recommendations to develop a
03:25:19 Speaker 62: seamless, inclusive, and equitable system that
03:25:21 Speaker 62: meets the needs of all of
03:25:23 Speaker 62: our diverse regions. Grey County, in
03:25:25 Speaker 62: collabouration with our regional partners, as
03:25:27 Speaker 62: mentioned, have successfully secured up to
03:25:29 Speaker 62: nine and a half million dollars
03:25:32 Speaker 62: in funding through the Ontario Transit
03:25:33 Speaker 62: Investment Funding Programme. This funding will
03:25:35 Speaker 62: support the development of a unified
03:25:37 Speaker 62: regional transit network that reflects the
03:25:40 Speaker 62: needs of. our communities and builds
03:25:41 Speaker 62: on existing services. The purpose of
03:25:43 Speaker 62: today's presentation is to update all
03:25:45 Speaker 62: of you on our key milestones
03:25:47 Speaker 62: and our timelines, to set early
03:25:50 Speaker 62: expectations for the work that will
03:25:52 Speaker 62: be done, and seek your continued
03:25:55 Speaker 62: support as we explore what is
03:25:57 Speaker 62: possible. A regional connected transit network
03:25:58 Speaker 62: has the potential to significantly improve
03:26:00 Speaker 62: the quality of life of our
03:26:03 Speaker 62: residents, especially those who rely on
03:26:05 Speaker 62: public transit for work, education, healthcare,
03:26:08 Speaker 62: and social connections. Our key milestones
03:26:10 Speaker 62: to date have been on June
03:26:13 Speaker 62: sixth, 2025. The province announced
03:26:15 Speaker 62: the nine and a half million
03:26:18 Speaker 62: dollars in funding to support this
03:26:20 Speaker 62: project. On June twelfth, council
03:26:23 Speaker 62: approved the report EDTC CW0525 to
03:26:25 Speaker 62: accept federal funding and initiate a
03:26:29 Speaker 62: proof of concept study. On August
03:26:31 Speaker 62: the fourteenth, 2025, a request
03:26:33 Speaker 62: for proposal was released to engage
03:26:36 Speaker 62: qualified vendors to design and cost
03:26:38 Speaker 62: a regional transit network. August 2025,
03:26:41 Speaker 62: that. transfer payment agreement was received
03:26:43 Speaker 62: from the province, and staff have
03:26:45 Speaker 62: had a chance to review it.
03:26:46 Speaker 62: September the 3rd, Wellington County decided
03:26:48 Speaker 62: to join our RFP process on
03:26:50 Speaker 62: with a focus on integrating along
03:26:51 Speaker 62: Highway 6, which is our Gulf
03:26:57 Speaker 62: to Owen Sound transit route, and
03:27:00 Speaker 62: look at Highway 9 corridors and
03:27:01 Speaker 62: into neighbouring communities. The study will
03:27:03 Speaker 62: explore how Wellington County's RideWell programme
03:27:04 Speaker 63: will also be able to be
03:27:05 Speaker 63: leveraged to enhance our existing services
03:27:07 Speaker 63: and our regional connectivity. On September
03:27:07 Speaker 63: 19th, last Friday, the 18th last
03:27:09 Speaker 63: Friday, the RFP did close. Our
03:27:11 Speaker 63: next steps will be to award
03:27:14 Speaker 63: successful bidder, and then between October
03:27:15 Speaker 09: 2025 and March 2026, we will
03:27:16 Speaker 09: work closely with the successful bidder
03:27:19 Speaker 09: to develop a proof of concept
03:27:21 Speaker 09: study, and then bring that back
03:27:24 Speaker 09: to you in the spring of
03:27:26 Speaker 09: 2026 for consideration. All throughout that
03:27:28 Speaker 09: study, though, you will have the
03:27:30 Speaker 09: opportunity to be an active participant
03:27:33 Speaker 09: and be a stakeholder, and let
03:27:35 Speaker 09: us know what you think, of
03:27:37 Speaker 09: course. About the proof of concept
03:27:38 Speaker 09: study, the RFP was developed collabouratively
03:27:42 Speaker 09: with our partnering counties and Saugie
03:27:44 Speaker 09: Mobility. Wellington County was later brought
03:27:46 Speaker 09: in, as just mentioned. The study
03:27:47 Speaker 09: will give staff and council the
03:27:48 Speaker 09: information necessary to make informed decisions
03:27:51 Speaker 09: about the future potential of a
03:27:53 Speaker 09: unified regional transit system. Once the
03:27:55 Speaker 09: study is completed, all the information
03:27:56 Speaker 09: will be presented to you for
03:27:57 Speaker 09: your consideration. This information will outline
03:27:59 Speaker 09: how funding would be allocated, the
03:28:02 Speaker 09: exact costs for years two through.
03:28:04 Speaker 09: five, the service levels we could
03:28:06 Speaker 09: achieve according to different levels of
03:28:08 Speaker 09: budget, and forecast of potential costs
03:28:10 Speaker 09: beyond the grant period. How will
03:28:11 Speaker 09: we sustain this long term? Importantly,
03:28:13 Speaker 09: no funds will be spent on
03:28:14 Speaker 09: a new system until council has
03:28:15 Speaker 09: reviewed the study and the findings
03:28:17 Speaker 09: and approved the final plan in
03:28:19 Speaker 09: 2026. So, what can you expect
03:28:20 Speaker 09: to receive from this study? The
03:28:23 Speaker 09: study components include community and provider
03:28:25 Speaker 09: engagement, a needs assessment, and a
03:28:26 Speaker 09: justification report, governance modelling and legislative
03:28:28 Speaker 09: compliance, transit network and service plan
03:28:30 Speaker 09: options, fleet planning, a fully costed
03:28:32 Speaker 09: financial plan including fare structures and
03:28:34 Speaker 09: sustainability, a comprehensive review of Soggy
03:28:36 Speaker 09: Mobility's infrastructure and their operations, and
03:28:39 Speaker 09: a software integration for smart and
03:28:41 Speaker 09: home and community support services to
03:28:43 Speaker 09: facilitate streamlined bookings, eliminate double dispatches,
03:28:45 Speaker 09: and improve coordination. The study is
03:28:47 Speaker 09: expected to. take approximately six months,
03:28:48 Speaker 09: followed by presentations to all of
03:28:51 Speaker 09: you back in the spring of
03:28:52 Speaker 09: 2026. Sorry, at this time, I'd
03:28:53 Speaker 09: like to pass it over to
03:28:54 Speaker 09: Savannah, and she will speak about
03:28:57 Speaker 09: the specifics of the OTIF grant
03:28:58 Speaker 09: and outline the next steps in
03:29:03 Speaker 09: more detail. Hello, after lunch now,
03:29:05 Speaker 09: so I'm going to talk a
03:29:08 Speaker 09: little bit about the OTIF grant
03:29:10 Speaker 09: in particular, but I do want
03:29:13 Speaker 09: to note that we do have
03:29:15 Speaker 27: a closed session component available with
03:29:17 Speaker 27: this report, so that. we can
03:29:18 Speaker 27: talk in more detail about that
03:29:20 Speaker 27: negotiating potential with the province. So,
03:29:26 Speaker 27: if that's something that you decide,
03:29:30 Speaker 27: we can go into. I will
03:29:31 Speaker 27: start, but then we can move
03:29:35 Speaker 64: into that if everybody's comfortable. So,
03:29:36 Speaker 64: as Stephanie mentioned, the TPA it
03:29:42 Speaker 64: was formally received on August
03:29:51 Speaker 23: 25th. So, after the announcement was
03:29:53 Speaker 23: made, the budget schedule you'll notice
03:29:54 Speaker 23: in Schedule D it outlines a
03:29:55 Speaker 23: year-by-year breakdown from years one through
03:29:57 Speaker 09: five. What is interesting
03:29:59 Speaker 09: about this is that because no
03:30:00 Speaker 09: formal decision has been made on
03:30:02 Speaker 09: the implementation of a unified transit
03:30:10 Speaker 09: network, the numbers in years two
03:30:13 Speaker 09: through five are estimates. They are
03:30:16 Speaker 09: the best estimates that we have
03:30:19 Speaker 65: to date, and we can talk
03:30:22 Speaker 65: a little bit about that as
03:30:25 Speaker 65: part of the negotiations enclosed. So
03:30:30 Speaker 20: we have had many conversations with
03:30:33 Speaker 20: the province, and Steph has a
03:30:36 Speaker 20: great relationship with them. So it's
03:30:39 Speaker 20: really nice to be able to
03:30:43 Speaker 20: get immediate answers through this process.
03:30:48 Speaker 20: They have confirmed that these financial
03:30:49 Speaker 20: figures in two through five are.
03:30:52 Speaker 20: purely estimates, and an upset limit
03:30:52 Speaker 21: in terms of provincial funding. So
03:30:58 Speaker 21: those true estimates will not be
03:30:59 Speaker 21: understood until we do the study,
03:31:01 Speaker 21: as this is very backwards to
03:31:02 Speaker 21: how we would normally ask you
03:31:03 Speaker 21: to be looking at a TPA.
03:31:05 Speaker 21: But that's something that we can
03:31:07 Speaker 21: discuss further as well. As Stephanie
03:31:08 Speaker 21: said, there will be no decision
03:31:11 Speaker 21: on implementation or what those costs
03:31:28 Speaker 21: would look like until we actually
03:31:29 Speaker 21: know what the programme could look
03:31:31 Speaker 21: like and what the costs could
03:31:34 Speaker 02: look like. The TPA does outline
03:31:36 Speaker 27: that we can change year over
03:31:38 Speaker 27: year funding. We can change year-over-year
03:31:39 Speaker 27: funding through amendments if both parties
03:31:40 Speaker 27: agree. That means that we can
03:31:42 Speaker 27: look at mutually beneficial agreements once
03:31:44 Speaker 27: the plan is finalized. And these
03:31:45 Speaker 27: two factors they enable council the
03:31:48 Speaker 27: flexibility to be able to accept
03:31:49 Speaker 27: the funding now and then complete
03:31:51 Speaker 27: the study and then come back
03:31:53 Speaker 27: for follow-up discussion. So, if you
03:31:54 Speaker 27: are okay with that, we would
03:31:57 Speaker 27: love to be able to talk
03:32:00 Speaker 27: a little bit more detail about
03:32:02 Speaker 27: those negotiations. But I'm going to
03:32:04 Speaker 27: pass it back over to the
03:32:05 Speaker 27: warden. Okay. Thank you very much,
03:32:08 Speaker 27: Director Myers and Manager Stewart. So,
03:32:11 Speaker 27: as the director has identified, anything
03:32:12 Speaker 27: that delves into a topic that
03:32:14 Speaker 27: really should be saved for closed
03:32:16 Speaker 27: session, hold on to those thoughts.
03:32:17 Speaker 27: Are there any discussion or questions
03:32:19 Speaker 27: that need to be asked here
03:32:21 Speaker 27: in open session at this point
03:32:24 Speaker 27: in time, Councillor Eccles? Thank you.
03:32:27 Speaker 27: Through the the budget process. at
03:32:28 Speaker 27: the bottom it says other municipal
03:32:30 Speaker 27: contributions. Is that the part about
03:32:31 Speaker 27: Wellington coming in, or would that
03:32:33 Speaker 27: be the town of for
03:32:36 Speaker 27: the municipality of Grey Highlands contributing?
03:32:38 Speaker 27: Thank you for that question. As
03:32:40 Speaker 27: you know, Smart is a partner
03:32:41 Speaker 27: in this, so all of the
03:32:44 Speaker 27: loose budget lines around gas tax
03:32:46 Speaker 27: municipal contributions. Gas tax, municipal contribution,
03:32:49 Speaker 27: and revenues are all based on Smart's current operations as a partner in this. Councillor Durbin. Thank you, and through you, I can't recall what the contribution is from the other counties in this, but the levy requirement from the county is 145,000. I'm going to presume that they're equally. participating. The fourth clause doesn't include Wellington County at this time, but the staff report references that. So, if it if it's a closed session discussion, then we can look at that. Okay. So we're going to hold on to that. Bah. Okay. Any other questions that need to be asked here and open? Okay. all right. So we do have the motion that has been moved and seconded is on the floor, and we do know that we will have a further item later in the agenda. So seeing no further hands, I'll call the the vote. All those in favour? Oh, sorry. Oh, hold on a moment. Okay, let's table the vote on this until we come back out. There may be further open session discussion prior to opening to voting in open until after the closed session. So we'll we will table the. I will not call the vote at this point in time. We do have one more item to deal with in open before we can go into closed, however, because we did pull item six C. Are you going to suggest we do that after? Yeah. Okay. I can. tell when she's leaning in on me; she's got a thought. Okay, so to keep the continuity of the discussion going, let's go to the closed session matters, and we will not forget about the item that we pulled from the consent agenda before everybody leaves. So, with that, looking at section eight, it's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to section two thirty nine two of the Municipal Act two thousand and one, as amended, to discuss number one. a position plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. And there are two items cited: number one, negotiations regarding investment readiness, and number two, negotiations with the Province of Ontario. So, with that, then I will ask for a mover. Move by Councillor De Braine, seconded by Councillor Carleton, to go into closed session. Any discussion? All. those in favour.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.