I am curious of the experiences/opinions of those who have had first hand or any other close encounters with the Crown as a plaintiff in Ontario.

In my two unique experiences, I have found a few things to appear true:

  • the Crown sometimes forgets their duty to act in the public interest and can pursue a case where those involved on both sides do not personally want to pursue a legal dispute.
  • the Crown does not act with enough discretion at times to throw out charges by the police which are flagrantly exaggerated and highly unlikely to succeed on their merits.
  • the Crown does not lend enough nuance to their pursuits and needs to focus on diversifying away from a punishment-based system.

Of course these are from personal experiences so I would like to hear from others in Ontario to know what you think. All experiences, opinions, and discussions are welcome with the exception of clearly provocative and/or discriminatory demeanour.

Thanks!

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.caEnglish
    2·
    1 day ago

    This is extremely common in domestic violence situations. Of course partners often don’t want to involve the law.

    A less common place this comes up is regarding sexual consent, which Canadians cannot always legally give in every situation they might expect, leaving their partner in legal jeopardy. If you lose consciousness, any sexual consent you have given (even explicitly, “after I fall asleep”) is immediately voided. There have been several cases of happy, consensual partners who talked about playing while asleep and were investigated and prosecuted by the Crown.