Since becoming defense secretary, Pete Hegseth has found no shortage of ways to bring his strand of conservative evangelicalism into the Pentagon.

He hosts monthly Christian worship services for employees. His department’s promotional videos have displayed Bible verses alongside military footage. In speeches and interviews, he often argues the U.S. was founded as a Christian nation and troops should embrace God, potentially risking the military’s secular mission and hard-won pluralism.

Now the defense secretary’s Christian rhetoric has taken on new meaning after the U.S. and Israel went to war with Iran, an Islamic theocracy.

  • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Religion, government, business, a non profit, it doesn’t matter what it is, people will assume a position of authority in whatever power structure that has space, and corrupt it. It’s not unique to religion. It’s only because religion has been corrupted by people desiring power, that people hate religion. But in that same vein, the fight should be about dismantling power structures and creating equality. Which, would be in line with some religions, ironically.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, in your list only religious people told me I was going to hell when I was 12 because I wouldn’t disown my lesbian parents. The kind of corruption and evil entitlement that people get is indeed unique to religion.

      • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        What role did religion play when my sisters ex partner, who was an atheist, beat the shit out of her and raped her? Please explain, as my life experiences are clearly limited.

          • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m sorry, I thought we were interjecting personal experience as conjecture.

            In direct response to your original comment, you have proven my point exactly. People who were in a position of power/authority abused it. It doesn’t matter what the modus operandi is when the fundamental consequence is the same. People want power, people get it, people abuse it. It’s not inherently unique to any one thing in humanity, it’s ubiquitous.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              You made a list. I was commenting on the list elements vs each other, not anything that wasn’t on the list. My comment was not intended to prove or disapprove any point since yours and mine were both opinions.

              • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, in your list only religious people…

                You started off your comment by saying no. This indicates a negative position. Since you responded to my comment, I can only assume you are taking a negative position against my comment.

                Then you followed that position up with anecdotal evidence, not responding to the key position I maintain; that this is not unique to religion, but every structure in which power and positions of authority exist. If it exists, it can be corrupted. Again, modus operandi, does not matter, since that is inherently a key part of my position.

                If you were just commenting a personal experience, then why did you start off with, “No”? What is your position in this debate? Because, I am finding myself further, and further lost.

                • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Disagreement isn’t proof or disproof or even an attempt at such. At this time I’m completely lost as to your point. You didn’t say every structure, you made a list and I felt that one of those things was not like the others. That one of those things does have a unique form of evil attached to it. I really don’t understand why you’re trying to add more to this conversation than actually exists.

                  • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I did say every structure through inference. You are still disagreeing with me. If you can’t see it, so be it. I’m Audi

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m sure he’d pivot away to something else, considering that he pivoted from talking about trans rights to try and say “I shouldn’t have to worry about walking with my daughters down the street and walking into two dudes making out.” Basically suggesting that gay and trans people are the source of moral decay in the U.S.

            The guy is the literal poster child of boomer moral decay, by the way. Digustingly obese, entitled, racist, MAGA.