Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — October 9, 2025
Hook: Feversham Paramedic Base Contract Delays
Grey County · Committee of the Whole · October 9, 2025
Summary
The Committee of the Whole met on October 9, 2025, to review administrative reports, minute adoptions, and a tender proposal facing budget constraints. While several minutes were adopted, a recommendation regarding the Feversham Paramedic Base contract was held pending due to funding overage concerns and sole-sourcing questions.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Council Awards Feversham Base Contract to Dom Construction: Director McNab recommended awarding RFP PS-04-25 design-build contract to Dom Construction for the Feversham Paramedic Base at a cost of 2000000 and 55000 dollars, funded by Debender. The project addresses increased call volume and improves rural response times in the southeast county corner, though it faces a budget overage and concerns regarding sole sourcing.
- PSR-CW-06-25 Tender Award Feversham Paramedic Base: Director McNab recommended awarding the design-build contract for the Feversham Paramedic Base to Dom Construction, funded by Debender. The project aims to address increased call volume and improve rural response times in the southeast county corner despite facing a budget overage and concerns regarding sole sourcing.
- PSR-CW-07-25 Additional Funding to Support SOS and Extended Services: Council considered a report recommending the receipt of additional funding to support Safe and Sound (SOS) and extended services through partner agencies until March 31st, 2026. The proposed grant aims to fund two navigators in Owen Sound for seven days a week, provide administrative support, and purchase basic needs supplies like waterproof boots, coats, food, tents, and sleeping bags.
- Budget and Finance Committee minutes dated September 24, 2025: The Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on September 24th concluded the adoption of minutes containing resolutions regarding capital presentations from Long Term Care and staffing requests for 2026 and 2027. Director Cornell presented a capital budget programme relying on building condition assessments, while Paul Mcqueen explained the utilization of provincial funding for comprehensive minor capital repairs to offset reserve costs.
- Regional Waste Strategy and HR Alignment: The Joint Municipal Services Committee reviewed minutes from September 26, 2025, and endorsed resolutions regarding waste management, staffing, and healthcare recruitment. The committee proposes a regional waste management strategy to explore efficiency gains amidst shifting market dynamics, requesting $250,000 for consultant engagement in the 2026 budget.
- Regional Waste Planning for Nine Municipalities: Council members discussed the urgent need for regional waste management planning to address impending landfill capacity shortages and rising costs across nine municipalities. Speakers emphasized that individual contracts are unsustainable as supply declines, urging the group to unite for a joint study rather than fighting separate battles.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- Committee of the Whole
- Date
- October 9, 2025
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Council member Paul McQueen called the committee meeting to order on October 9, 2025.
00:48:32 Speaker 01: switch over. Thank you. I'd like
00:48:35 Speaker 01: to call to order this committee.
00:48:36 Speaker 01: The whole. meeting of October 9th,
00:48:38 Speaker 01: 2025. At this point in time,
00:48:39 Speaker 01: I'll put out a call if
2 Declaration of Interest
Council considered a notice of motion requesting provincial support to oppose legislation prohibiting automated speed enforcement cameras. Speakers argued that municipalities must retain the authority under the Municipal Act to decide on safety measures like traffic cameras based on local resident concerns. The discussion highlighted that revenue from these cameras is often reinvested into community safety zones rather than burdening taxpayers. Councillors expressed frustration with the provincial government's attempt to override municipal jurisdiction and prevent culture change regarding speeding. One speaker noted that current enforcement thresholds are not always disclosed to the public, raising democratic concerns about transparency. The motion serves as a tribute to a former community member who advocated for taxpayer protection and safety initiatives.
00:48:41 Speaker 01: there are any declarations of interest
00:48:42 Speaker 01: on this agenda. Seeing no hands
00:48:43 Speaker 26: raised, we'll move on. We have
00:48:47 Speaker 26: business arising from the minutes. We
00:48:50 Speaker 26: have one notice of motion from
00:48:52 Speaker 26: Councillor Gregg. So in a moment,
00:48:54 Speaker 26: Councillor Gregg, I will ask you
00:48:56 Speaker 26: to read out your notice of
00:48:58 Speaker 26: motion without any explanation or intro.
00:49:01 Speaker 26: I'll look for a seconder for
00:49:03 Speaker 26: you, and if we have a
00:49:07 Speaker 26: seconder and it's on the floor
00:49:09 Speaker 26: for discussion, I will return to
00:49:12 Speaker 26: you directly. So, would you like
00:49:13 Speaker 26: to? Could you read? Sorry, the
00:49:16 Speaker 26: way we usually do it back
00:49:19 Speaker 26: home is the person who's serving
00:49:21 Speaker 26: the notice of motion reads it
00:49:24 Speaker 26: out, and then we look for
00:49:27 Speaker 26: a seconder before there's any discussion.
00:49:29 Speaker 26: So, over to you. The mic
00:49:32 Speaker 26: is yours. Thank you, Gordon Matyszak,
00:49:35 Speaker 26: and I'd like to introduce the
00:49:37 Speaker 26: notice of motion. Whereas Part Two
00:49:39 Speaker 26: of the Municipal Act generally confers
00:49:43 Speaker 01: broad authority on the municipality to
00:49:47 Speaker 01: enable the municipality. to govern its
00:49:50 Speaker 01: affairs as it considers appropriate, and
00:49:52 Speaker 01: to enhance the municipality's ability to
00:49:54 Speaker 01: respond to municipal issues, and whereas
00:49:56 Speaker 01: community safety is of foremost concern
00:49:57 Speaker 01: to residents, and whereas automated speed
00:49:59 Speaker 01: traffic cameras assist in responding to
00:50:01 Speaker 01: resident concerns, now therefore be it
00:50:03 Speaker 01: resolved that this council asks MPP
00:50:08 Speaker 27: Vickers and MPP Saunderson to support
00:50:10 Speaker 27: this position in opposing any provincial
00:50:12 Speaker 27: legislation introduced to. prohibit the use
00:50:14 Speaker 27: of automated speed enforcement, and that
00:50:18 Speaker 27: this resolution be circulated to each
00:50:21 Speaker 27: municipality within Grey County, requesting their
00:50:24 Speaker 27: endorsement, and that the resolution be
00:50:25 Speaker 27: sent to Premier Ford, Minister of
00:50:27 Speaker 27: Transportation Pravmeet Sakharia, MPP Vickers, and
00:50:32 Speaker 27: MPP Saunderson. Thank you very much.
00:50:34 Speaker 27: And I okay. Well, sorry. Directionally,
00:50:37 Speaker 27: I saw Councillor Dobrine will second
00:50:38 Speaker 27: that motion, but I. In that
00:50:40 Speaker 27: motion, but I did acknowledge the
00:50:41 Speaker 27: other hands that have been raised.
00:50:44 Speaker 27: It's now on the floor for
00:50:46 Speaker 27: discussion. So I will look to
00:50:48 Speaker 27: Councillor Greg to introduce your notice.
00:50:50 Speaker 27: Any further details you'd like to
00:50:53 Speaker 27: provide? Thank you. And I'd like
00:50:57 Speaker 27: to just provide this notice also
00:50:59 Speaker 27: as a tribute to a member
00:51:01 Speaker 27: of our community in Owen Sound
00:51:05 Speaker 27: who campaigned for years, canvassing for
00:51:08 Speaker 27: candidates who were strong supporters of
00:51:10 Speaker 27: looking after. the taxpayer—that's something that
00:51:13 Speaker 27: Bill King, who was a member
00:51:15 Speaker 27: for many years on our operations
00:51:17 Speaker 27: committee in Oceansound, advocated for and
00:51:19 Speaker 27: supported initiatives that looked after the
00:51:22 Speaker 27: taxpayer. And we lost Bill probably
00:51:24 Speaker 27: a little more than a year
00:51:26 Speaker 27: ago. But this is somewhat of
00:51:28 Speaker 27: a tribute to to Bill because
00:51:30 Speaker 27: he was a strong advocate for
00:51:32 Speaker 27: community safety, and automated speed enforcement
00:51:33 Speaker 27: and cameras were part of that
00:51:37 Speaker 27: in Bill's in Bill's mind. So
00:51:39 Speaker 27: I am. quite bothered by what
00:51:43 Speaker 27: the premier is has initiated here.
00:51:45 Speaker 27: It is demonstrated when he announced
00:51:47 Speaker 27: this legislation. He had the mayor
00:51:48 Speaker 27: of Vaughan standing beside him. Vaughan
00:51:49 Speaker 27: removed traffic cameras in their communities,
00:51:52 Speaker 27: and that is fine. That's democracy
00:51:54 Speaker 27: as it should be, and I
00:51:56 Speaker 27: applaud him for that. But I
00:51:57 Speaker 27: think what is most important is
00:52:02 Speaker 27: that the municipalities have the opportunity.
00:52:08 Speaker 27: to decide whether or not those
00:52:11 Speaker 27: traffic cameras are something that are
00:52:15 Speaker 27: a benefit in their community that
00:52:17 Speaker 27: respond to residents' concerns. And if
00:52:19 Speaker 27: you do not feel that way
00:52:22 Speaker 27: and you have them in already
00:52:24 Speaker 27: installed, you can walk back that
00:52:26 Speaker 27: decision municipally. It's a municipal decision.
00:52:28 Speaker 27: And he aligned himself the day
00:52:31 Speaker 27: he announced the legislation with other
00:52:32 Speaker 27: mayors who demonstrated that it is
00:52:35 Speaker 27: a municipal decision, and it's a
00:52:36 Speaker 27: municipal decision as provided. It's a
00:52:39 Speaker 27: municipal decision. It's provided in the
00:52:42 Speaker 27: Municipal Act. If you want to
00:52:44 Speaker 27: take away the ability for municipalities
00:52:47 Speaker 27: to look after resident concerns, change
00:52:49 Speaker 27: the Municipal Act. I challenge you
00:52:54 Speaker 27: to do that because that invites
00:52:56 Speaker 27: a whole lot more public input
00:52:58 Speaker 27: and a lot more time. It's
00:53:01 Speaker 27: announced that the assault on the
00:53:03 Speaker 27: taxpayer is over, and I ask
00:53:04 Speaker 27: myself, really, who do you think
00:53:07 Speaker 27: funds the provincial government and all
00:53:08 Speaker 27: the infrastructure that you're now asking
00:53:11 Speaker 27: to be created out of a
00:53:13 Speaker 27: new fund? What I'd like to
00:53:15 Speaker 27: do is invite the premier to
00:53:17 Speaker 27: come to Owen Sound to visit
00:53:19 Speaker 27: with me and one of our
00:53:20 Speaker 27: fine men and women who drive
00:53:23 Speaker 27: a snowplow and a fire truck,
00:53:26 Speaker 27: and we will crush a box
00:53:28 Speaker 27: of Chapman's ice cream bars as
00:53:30 Speaker 27: we walk around the city, and
00:53:34 Speaker 27: we will inform the premier. and
00:53:36 Speaker 27: the premier's staff of what kind
00:53:38 Speaker 27: of obstacles that speed bumps and
00:53:41 Speaker 27: enhanced crosswalks provide in terms of
00:53:44 Speaker 27: the machinery and the mechanics in
00:53:46 Speaker 27: a snowy area that we have
00:53:48 Speaker 27: to look after for for five,
00:53:53 Speaker 27: hopefully not six months of the
00:53:56 Speaker 27: year. But it's hard on equipment.
00:53:59 Speaker 27: It's hard on money. It's hard
00:54:02 Speaker 27: on the taxpayer. It's hard on
00:54:04 Speaker 27: people who we're not breaking the
00:54:05 Speaker 27: law if you don't speed. that's
00:54:08 Speaker 27: it's a fundamental easy question. If
00:54:11 Speaker 27: you don't want to get fined,
00:54:13 Speaker 27: don't speed past a school or
00:54:16 Speaker 27: through a community safety zone. Hopefully,
00:54:18 Speaker 27: you learn your lesson. And then
00:54:21 Speaker 27: it's not resultant upon the taxpayers
00:54:23 Speaker 27: who may not have a car,
00:54:27 Speaker 27: who may choose to walk as
00:54:29 Speaker 27: their means of transportation or use
00:54:30 Speaker 27: public transit. These are the people
00:54:33 Speaker 27: now that are being asked to
00:54:36 Speaker 27: pay more taxes for a new
00:54:40 Speaker 27: fund. provincially to resolve to respond
00:54:43 Speaker 27: to speeding that may or may
00:54:46 Speaker 27: not make a difference in moving
00:54:48 Speaker 27: the needle. It reminds me of
00:54:49 Speaker 27: to steal a quote from Abraham
00:54:51 Speaker 27: Lincoln. Let's have a government for
00:54:53 Speaker 27: the people, by the people, and
00:54:55 Speaker 08: that's why I would hope the
00:55:00 Speaker 08: premier would entertain a free vote
00:55:02 Speaker 08: at Queen's Park, so that each
00:55:03 Speaker 08: legislator can represent their people and
00:55:05 Speaker 08: not have a whip vote. Where
00:55:08 Speaker 28: we've lost that ability now to
00:55:12 Speaker 28: have meaningful dialogueue at Queen's Park.
00:55:15 Speaker 28: Let's have democracy. Let's have a
00:55:17 Speaker 28: free vote. Let's have legislators who've
00:55:20 Speaker 28: been elected represent their communities. We
00:55:22 Speaker 28: are here as mayors and deputy
00:55:24 Speaker 28: mayors representing what we think is
00:55:26 Speaker 28: best in our communities. I'm asking
00:55:28 Speaker 28: this council to ensure that we
00:55:31 Speaker 28: have the opportunity. to address those
00:55:35 Speaker 28: items in our community without those
00:55:36 Speaker 28: abilities being taken away from us
00:55:38 Speaker 28: and positioned in the sole hands
00:55:42 Speaker 28: of one person and the prime
00:55:45 Speaker 28: minister's office or the premier's office,
00:55:47 Speaker 28: which has become far too prevalent,
00:55:50 Speaker 28: it seems, in the last several
00:55:54 Speaker 28: years. Thank you. Okay. Thank you
00:55:55 Speaker 28: very much for that introduction. So
00:55:57 Speaker 28: it is now on the floor
00:55:58 Speaker 28: for discussion. From further comments from
00:56:01 Speaker 28: other council members. We'll go to
00:56:04 Speaker 28: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very much,
00:56:07 Speaker 28: Ward Matrosov. The biggest concern with
00:56:08 Speaker 28: the way the province is addressing
00:56:14 Speaker 28: this is trying to attack it
00:56:17 Speaker 28: as if it is a municipality
00:56:18 Speaker 28: trying to do a cash grab,
00:56:20 Speaker 28: and this is the terminology that
00:56:23 Speaker 28: the premier is using, and it
00:56:25 Speaker 28: is frustrating to what Councillor Greg
00:56:27 Speaker 28: just spoke to, when the objective
00:56:29 Speaker 28: is to try. to change the
00:56:31 Speaker 28: culture of speeding within Ontario. Currently,
00:56:33 Speaker 28: wherever you go, the general culture
00:56:39 Speaker 28: is twenty kilometres over a speed
00:56:41 Speaker 28: limit. We design roads, and then
00:56:43 Speaker 28: we have repeated calls on probably
00:56:45 Speaker 28: weekly basis. For everybody here, gets
00:56:47 Speaker 28: a call from some resident talking
00:56:49 Speaker 28: about the speeding across and in
00:56:51 Speaker 28: front of their property and in
00:56:56 Speaker 28: front of their area. Trying to
00:56:57 Speaker 28: implement a culture change takes many
00:57:00 Speaker 28: different measures. Takes many different methods.
00:57:02 Speaker 28: The premier responded to a letter
00:57:03 Speaker 28: that was sent to him by
00:57:05 Speaker 28: many different mayors and and local
00:57:06 Speaker 28: municipal politicians from across Ontario by
00:57:07 Speaker 29: saying, "If the objective of the
00:57:13 Speaker 29: speed camera is to prevent speeding,
00:57:15 Speaker 29: then it's failing miserably." Well, according
00:57:17 Speaker 24: to that standard, then your stop
00:57:22 Speaker 24: signs are failing, your signage for
00:57:24 Speaker 24: the speed limit is failing, your
00:57:29 Speaker 24: signage for for crosswalks is failing
00:57:33 Speaker 24: because everywhere. there is a culture
00:57:36 Speaker 24: of impatience, of driver lack of
00:57:40 Speaker 24: driver empathy in terms of who's
00:57:42 Speaker 24: around them, it is a method
00:57:45 Speaker 24: to try to address that. In
00:57:47 Speaker 24: addition to all the other things
00:57:51 Speaker 24: we're trying to change, I think
00:57:54 Speaker 24: that there is a frustration with
00:57:58 Speaker 24: Premier Ford overstepping into what the
00:58:01 Speaker 24: motion is speaking to our jurisdiction
00:58:05 Speaker 24: of trying to make controls, but
00:58:06 Speaker 30: fundamentally. for me, this is a
00:58:11 Speaker 30: safety thing that residents bring up
00:58:14 Speaker 30: time and time again. We're trying
00:58:15 Speaker 30: to change the culture, and the
00:58:18 Speaker 30: premier is preventing us from doing.
00:58:19 Speaker 30: Thank you, and we'll go to
00:58:21 Speaker 30: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, and as
00:58:23 Speaker 07: the secondor, thank you for recognizing
00:58:27 Speaker 07: me. I have to echo both
00:58:28 Speaker 07: speakers, both of my colleagues, but
00:58:32 Speaker 07: also, not all municipalities have. are
00:58:33 Speaker 07: are are sorry. Let me rephrase
00:58:35 Speaker 07: this. Most municipalities with automated speed
00:58:37 Speaker 07: enforcement are following the guidelines and
00:58:40 Speaker 07: the revenue that they are getting,
00:58:41 Speaker 07: which isn't the full amount because
00:58:43 Speaker 07: the province gets a significant portion
00:58:44 Speaker 07: of that, are reinvesting the revenue
00:58:47 Speaker 07: specifically for improved safety in those
00:58:49 Speaker 07: community safety zones. So. that the
00:58:51 Speaker 07: taxpayer isn't on the hook for
00:58:56 Speaker 07: those improvements. That's my comment, and
00:59:01 Speaker 07: I was pleased to support this
00:59:03 Speaker 07: motion. Thank you. Other comments? We'll
00:59:04 Speaker 07: go to Councillor McQueen. Thank you,
00:59:05 Speaker 07: Madam Warden. I may be a
00:59:09 Speaker 07: devil devil's advocate here, but just
00:59:11 Speaker 07: I see two parts in this
00:59:13 Speaker 07: notice of motion. One is the
00:59:14 Speaker 07: the ability for municipalities to make
00:59:18 Speaker 07: decisions. Well, back in 1980. 1990.
00:59:20 Speaker 07: Sorry, I gotta get my dates
00:59:22 Speaker 07: here. 2008, 2009. There's what they
00:59:24 Speaker 07: call the Green Energy Act came
00:59:27 Speaker 07: into play. It took away our
00:59:29 Speaker 07: ability to decide for green energy
00:59:30 Speaker 07: projects, and that wasn't playing until
00:59:34 Speaker 07: for quite a long time. And
00:59:35 Speaker 07: there was a lot of discussion
00:59:36 Speaker 07: around that. I know with us
00:59:38 Speaker 07: and Greenhounds, we developed policy around
00:59:39 Speaker 07: placement of turbines, and that was
00:59:40 Speaker 07: early. So it's not unique that
00:59:42 Speaker 07: we've dealt with legislation that does.
00:59:44 Speaker 07: direct or guide or basically tells
00:59:47 Speaker 07: what the lower tier or the
00:59:50 Speaker 07: municipalities what they because we are
00:59:51 Speaker 07: creatures of the province we know
00:59:53 Speaker 07: that right on the part of
00:59:54 Speaker 07: speed cameras I remember at the
00:59:56 Speaker 07: Firesham Fair a few weeks back
00:59:58 Speaker 07: having a large discussion where a
01:00:00 Speaker 07: number of people having concern of
01:00:01 Speaker 07: a of a particular area of
01:00:03 Speaker 07: a municipality south of of Greyhounds
01:00:04 Speaker 07: that had speed cameras. and the
01:00:06 Speaker 07: threshold was two kilometres over the
01:00:09 Speaker 07: speed. So if it was a
01:00:12 Speaker 07: forty, you got a ticket for
01:00:13 Speaker 07: forty-two, which seemed it was quite
01:00:15 Speaker 07: a bit of a concern around
01:00:17 Speaker 07: that. And that I I go
01:00:19 Speaker 07: to the threshold. It was just
01:00:20 Speaker 07: on the news two days ago.
01:00:22 Speaker 07: One of the councillors from the
01:00:23 Speaker 07: City of Toronto is going to
01:00:25 Speaker 07: advocate because the threshold is not
01:00:27 Speaker 07: disclosed. I think in the sense
01:00:29 Speaker 07: of of of our democracy and
01:00:31 Speaker 07: everything else, why don't the people
01:00:34 Speaker 07: know what that threshold is? We'll
01:00:36 Speaker 07: know what that threshold is if
01:00:38 Speaker 07: it's ten over or twelve over
01:00:40 Speaker 07: or five over or two over.
01:00:42 Speaker 07: So I think there's a bit
01:00:43 Speaker 07: of a, and I think as
01:00:45 Speaker 07: as Deputy Mayor or Councillor Nielsen
01:00:47 Speaker 07: said, it's an understanding that if
01:00:48 Speaker 07: you're on a provincial highway or
01:00:51 Speaker 07: municipal road or whatever, that from
01:00:53 Speaker 07: a from a police perspective, if
01:00:55 Speaker 07: you're maybe under fifteen, and yeah,
01:00:56 Speaker 07: that's just the way it has
01:00:57 Speaker 07: been. I think nobody's going to
01:00:59 Speaker 07: disagree with that. We know that.
01:01:00 Speaker 07: So I think the threshold is
01:01:03 Speaker 07: one of the issues that that
01:01:05 Speaker 07: I know that was a big.
01:01:07 Speaker 07: That I know, that was the
01:01:10 Speaker 07: big the discussion that I had
01:01:12 Speaker 07: with a number of people. There,
01:01:14 Speaker 07: some of the other things I've
01:01:17 Speaker 07: heard is is if it was
01:01:20 Speaker 07: set up for community safety zones
01:01:22 Speaker 07: and school zones, I also hear
01:01:24 Speaker 07: it's in other zones. There's no
01:01:26 Speaker 07: debate for the protection of kids
01:01:27 Speaker 07: or those areas where the pedestrians.
01:01:29 Speaker 07: I, you know, maybe there needs
01:01:31 Speaker 07: to be rework of this, but
01:01:33 Speaker 07: not totally out. I don't disagree
01:01:35 Speaker 07: with that, but that is something
01:01:38 Speaker 07: else that it's been other areas
01:01:41 Speaker 07: that I've heard. I don't know
01:01:43 Speaker 07: a lot about. this. Signage has
01:01:44 Speaker 07: been another thing that we interesting
01:01:45 Speaker 07: that the city of Toronto has
01:01:48 Speaker 07: said, "Look, we need more signs
01:01:50 Speaker 07: that we need to tell people."
01:01:51 Speaker 07: So maybe there has been a
01:01:53 Speaker 07: few issues that needs to be
01:01:55 Speaker 07: rectified. I heard of an example
01:01:58 Speaker 30: of that same community, South of
01:02:02 Speaker 30: Grey Highlands, that a fella was
01:02:04 Speaker 30: racing to the hospital because his
01:02:05 Speaker 30: mother was dying at four thirty
01:02:06 Speaker 30: in the morning. At four thirty
01:02:08 Speaker 30: in the morning, and got a
01:02:10 Speaker 30: huge tech. You got a huge
01:02:12 Speaker 30: ticket. We're and and so, is
01:02:16 Speaker 14: a safety zone at four thirty
01:02:19 Speaker 14: in the morning. I know on
01:02:21 Speaker 14: Gray Road Four, we have the
01:02:26 Speaker 14: flashing light and max will goes
01:02:29 Speaker 14: off when it's a school goes
01:02:31 Speaker 14: from fifty to forty. It's a
01:02:33 Speaker 14: school zone. It's reduced speed at
01:02:35 Speaker 14: the time when there's buses and
01:02:38 Speaker 14: kids. So I guess in summary,
01:02:40 Speaker 14: you know, I think the intention
01:02:42 Speaker 14: was there. I think there needs
01:02:44 Speaker 14: to be a rework and some
01:02:47 Speaker 14: of this stuff to maybe get
01:02:48 Speaker 14: more public support. and I just
01:02:50 Speaker 14: think that there's there's a lot
01:02:53 Speaker 14: of there's a lot of dynamics
01:02:56 Speaker 14: here that one size isn't fitting
01:02:58 Speaker 14: all, and I think one of
01:03:01 Speaker 14: the things is the threshold. I'll
01:03:04 Speaker 14: leave it at that. Okay, thank
01:03:06 Speaker 14: you very much. Just looking around
01:03:08 Speaker 14: for any first hands before I
01:03:09 Speaker 14: go back to any additional comments.
01:03:13 Speaker 14: Not seeing any, so I'll go
01:03:16 Speaker 14: back to Council. Oh, I'll go
01:03:18 Speaker 14: to Council Deputy Warden Milne, and
01:03:22 Speaker 14: then over to Councillor Doigreen. Thank
01:03:25 Speaker 14: you, Warden. I think the fundamental
01:03:27 Speaker 14: thing here is the speed limit
01:03:30 Speaker 14: is the law. So if the
01:03:34 Speaker 14: speed limit's forty, you're regardless of
01:03:35 Speaker 31: what you think the threshold should
01:03:41 Speaker 31: be. If you're over forty, you're
01:03:44 Speaker 31: breaking the law, whether you're in
01:03:46 Speaker 31: a safety zone or not. So
01:03:50 Speaker 31: if I hurt somebody in the
01:03:53 Speaker 31: middle of the night at four
01:03:57 Speaker 31: thirty, speed. At 4:30, speeding, do
01:03:58 Speaker 31: I get a lesser fine? Is
01:04:00 Speaker 31: that sort of the logic that
01:04:03 Speaker 31: we're going through here? I had
01:04:07 Speaker 31: a discussion with the local MPP,
01:04:10 Speaker 31: and he stated that he had
01:04:12 Speaker 31: heard that a local business has
01:04:14 Speaker 31: incurred over a thousand dollars in
01:04:16 Speaker 31: speeding fines, and that was unfair.
01:04:19 Speaker 31: I said, well, the logical thing
01:04:25 Speaker 31: would be for that company to
01:04:26 Speaker 31: slow down, and they wouldn't get
01:04:28 Speaker 31: the fine. It's as simple as
01:04:30 Speaker 31: that. But to bring it right
01:04:31 Speaker 31: back to what the motion is
01:04:34 Speaker 31: speaking to, if the premier really
01:04:37 Speaker 07: wants to dictate your municipalities, what
01:04:40 Speaker 07: they should do, there's an election
01:04:41 Speaker 07: next year for municipal government, and
01:04:43 Speaker 07: maybe he should run there. Otherwise,
01:04:44 Speaker 07: stick to your net. Thank you,
01:04:45 Speaker 07: Madam Warden. Thank you. And just
01:04:48 Speaker 07: in follow up, I know that
01:04:52 Speaker 07: the Big City Mayors Caucus from
01:04:56 Speaker 07: AMO and a an interview with
01:04:57 Speaker 07: the Mayor of Burlington, Marianne Mead
01:04:58 Speaker 07: Ward. I believe the ask it's
01:05:01 Speaker 07: not to throw the baby out
01:05:03 Speaker 07: with the bathwater. Don't throw out
01:05:05 Speaker 07: the tool that can benefit our
01:05:08 Speaker 07: communities. Let's visit what the threshold
01:05:11 Speaker 07: should be. Let's visit what. additional
01:05:12 Speaker 07: signage there should be. Let's visit
01:05:14 Speaker 07: if there's a time frame, but
01:05:15 Speaker 07: let's have the conversation as opposed
01:05:18 Speaker 07: to ripping tools out of our
01:05:19 Speaker 07: toolbox that help us protect our
01:05:20 Speaker 07: citizens. Okay, thank you. I don't
01:05:22 Speaker 07: see any other further first hand,
01:05:24 Speaker 07: so I'll go back to Councillor
01:05:26 Speaker 07: McQueen. Well, thank you, Madam Warden,
01:05:28 Speaker 07: and I'm just communicating comments that
01:05:33 Speaker 07: have been made to me. Further
01:05:36 Speaker 07: from that. situation, the individual that,
01:05:38 Speaker 08: and I'll tell you, if I
01:05:39 Speaker 08: have a loved one that's dying
01:05:42 Speaker 08: and I only have so much
01:05:50 Speaker 08: time to get there, I may
01:05:52 Speaker 08: speed as well. It's my choice,
01:05:54 Speaker 08: absolutely. But I have heard that
01:05:55 Speaker 08: that individual has got that ticket
01:05:57 Speaker 08: removed. But the point is, when
01:05:58 Speaker 08: there's a police officer that does
01:06:00 Speaker 08: pull you over, there is maybe
01:06:01 Speaker 08: some discretionary discussion around that. And
01:06:03 Speaker 08: with the tickets, there's no discretionary.
01:06:05 Speaker 08: It's get the ticket. Obviously, this
01:06:07 Speaker 08: individual did follow up and and
01:06:09 Speaker 08: did. But I think, in a
01:06:11 Speaker 08: sense of from a public's perspective,
01:06:13 Speaker 08: it's maybe the public split on
01:06:14 Speaker 08: this. But I think, in a
01:06:15 Speaker 08: sense that maybe to what Councillor
01:06:17 Speaker 08: Debrine has said is, it needs
01:06:20 Speaker 08: to be a rework and and
01:06:22 Speaker 08: maybe use the tool specifically to
01:06:23 Speaker 08: what it's designed for and
01:06:25 Speaker 08: and you know from that. But
01:06:27 Speaker 08: I'm just communicating comments that I
01:06:29 Speaker 08: have received. Okay, thank you. Looking
01:06:31 Speaker 08: online, looking. around the table, not
01:06:33 Speaker 08: seeing any other hands up for
01:06:38 Speaker 08: discussion, so I'll call the vote.
01:06:41 Speaker 08: All those in favour, and that
01:06:43 Speaker 08: motion is carried. Okay. We do
01:06:46 Speaker 08: not have any delegations this morning,
01:06:48 Speaker 08: and I'm just going to. What
01:06:50 Speaker 08: I'm going to do is I'm
01:06:51 Speaker 08: going to ask momentarily about which
01:06:53 Speaker 08: items may or may not be
01:06:56 Speaker 08: pulled from the consent agenda. We'll
01:06:58 Speaker 08: take it down to that point.
01:06:58 Speaker 08: I will then call a. brief
01:07:02 Speaker 08: break. We do have, we do
01:07:04 Speaker 08: have a scheduled agenda, a scheduled
01:07:07 Speaker 08: lunch at a certain time. It
01:07:09 Speaker 08: is so I'm just being conscious
01:07:12 Speaker 08: of that. So we'll have a
01:07:14 Speaker 08: little bit of an earlier, but
01:07:15 Speaker 08: a shorter break because we will
01:07:16 Speaker 08: actually be calling for lunch prior
01:07:18 Speaker 08: to 12 o'clock. So, with that,
01:07:20 Speaker 08: then I will move on to
01:16:15 Speaker 08: number five, which is a determination
01:16:16 Speaker 08: of items requiring separate discussion. There
01:16:19 Speaker 05: are only three listed in item
01:16:34 Speaker 32: six, six A, B, and C.
01:16:36 Speaker 32: Are there any items that someone
01:16:38 Speaker 32: wishes to pull for further discussion?
01:16:40 Speaker 32: Okay, I'm not seeing any hands
01:16:43 Speaker 32: up. That's excellent. So therefore, it's
01:16:46 Speaker 32: recommended that the following consentage items
01:16:48 Speaker 32: consent items be received, and that
01:16:50 Speaker 32: staff be authorised to take the
01:16:53 Speaker 32: actions necessary to give effect to
01:16:55 Speaker 32: the recommendations in the staff reports,
01:16:57 Speaker 32: and that the correspondence be supported
01:16:59 Speaker 32: or received for information as recommended
01:17:02 Speaker 32: in the consent agenda. May I
01:17:04 Speaker 32: ask for a mover and a
01:17:06 Speaker 32: seconder? Move by. A mover and
01:17:09 Speaker 32: a seconder. Moved by Councillor Body,
01:17:11 Speaker 32: seconded by Councillor Nielsen. It's now
01:17:15 Speaker 32: on the floor for discussion.
01:17:18 Speaker 32: Seeing no hands up, all those
01:17:21 Speaker 32: in favour, and that motion is
01:17:23 Speaker 32: carried. So that will mean that
01:17:25 Speaker 32: after a brief break, if we
01:17:28 Speaker 32: could try to be back by
01:17:29 Speaker 32: eleven ten, that would be wonderful.
01:17:31 Speaker 32: We will pick up at item
01:17:33 Speaker 32: seven a when we return. Thank
01:17:51 Speaker 33: you. All right. If I could
01:17:54 Speaker 33: invite our committee, the whole members,
01:17:55 Speaker 33: back to the horseshoe. Okay, so
01:17:58 Speaker 33: we have our quorum here. So
7.a PSR-CW-06-25 Tender Award Feversham Paramedic Base
Director McNab recommended awarding the design-build contract for the Feversham Paramedic Base to Dom Construction, funded by Debender. The project aims to address increased call volume and improve rural response times in the southeast county corner despite facing a budget overage and concerns regarding sole sourcing.
01:18:00 Speaker 33: we will continue then with item
01:18:05 Speaker 33: seven A, and this is the
01:18:07 Speaker 33: first of our items for discussion.
01:18:09 Speaker 33: It is recommended that report PSRCW
01:18:11 Speaker 33: zero six twenty five be received,
01:18:13 Speaker 33: and that the Dom Construction Limited
01:18:15 Speaker 33: be awarded RFP PS zero four
01:18:18 Speaker 33: twenty five design build for the
01:18:19 Speaker 33: new paramedic service base in Feversham
01:18:22 Speaker 33: at a cost of. two million
01:18:24 Speaker 33: one hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars,
01:18:27 Speaker 33: excluding HST, and that the project
01:18:28 Speaker 33: be funded by Debender as approved
01:18:30 Speaker 33: in the 2025 Paramedic Services Capital
01:18:32 Speaker 33: Budget, and that Council authorise staff
01:18:33 Speaker 33: to proceed with the preparations of
01:18:36 Speaker 33: CCDC fourteen twenty thirteen design-build stipulated
01:18:38 Speaker 33: price contract prior to formal Council
01:18:40 Speaker 33: approval, as per Section twenty six
01:18:42 Speaker 33: point six B of the Procedural
01:18:46 Speaker 33: Bylaw. May ask for a mover.
01:18:47 Speaker 33: Okay, so we've got that moved
01:18:49 Speaker 33: by Councillor Nielsen and seconded by
01:18:51 Speaker 33: Councillor Pringle. It's now on the
01:18:53 Speaker 33: floor for discussion. Welcome, Director McNab.
01:18:55 Speaker 33: Morning, Warden County Council. Happy to
01:18:57 Speaker 33: be here today to talk about
01:18:59 Speaker 33: the. new Feversham base with the
01:19:01 Speaker 33: comprehensive deployment review that we did
01:19:03 Speaker 33: in 2022-2023. That review was to
01:19:06 Speaker 33: address increased call volume across the
01:19:07 Speaker 33: county over the next 10 years,
01:19:09 Speaker 33: and with that, we were balancing
01:19:10 Speaker 33: out urban response times with rural
01:19:12 Speaker 33: response times. You know, at the
01:19:15 Speaker 33: same time addressing increased call volume.
01:19:18 Speaker 33: Call volume is expected to go
01:19:19 Speaker 33: up 68% over 10 years, and
01:19:22 Speaker 33: we need roughly about 40%. We
01:19:25 Speaker 33: need roughly about forty percent in
01:19:27 Speaker 33: resources to match that. So, you
01:19:29 Speaker 33: can see the first cars that
01:19:32 Speaker 33: we added were in One Sun
01:19:34 Speaker 33: and Hanover, where our more urban
01:19:36 Speaker 33: areas are, where large volume of
01:19:37 Speaker 33: the calls are. But part of
01:19:46 Speaker 33: the deployment review was to recommend
01:19:49 Speaker 33: to improve rural response times. And
01:19:51 Speaker 33: so, this is the first base
01:19:51 Speaker 33: we're building in Feversham with approval.
01:19:54 Speaker 33: This area is been an under-serviced
01:19:56 Speaker 33: area, but compared to the other
01:19:59 Speaker 33: areas that we've talked about before
01:20:01 Speaker 33: in the past. I believe, Council
01:20:04 Speaker 33: McQueen. We've been talking this probably
01:20:06 Speaker 33: since about twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen.
01:20:08 Speaker 33: That eventually that that would be
01:20:13 Speaker 33: a place that we would go
01:20:15 Speaker 33: to build a base in that
01:20:17 Speaker 33: southeast corner of the county. That
01:20:19 Speaker 33: that area right now is probably
01:20:20 Speaker 33: I think our closest base to
01:20:22 Speaker 33: the Fiverr Sham area is twenty
01:20:25 Speaker 33: one kilometres up to twenty nine
01:20:29 Speaker 33: and Craig Lea. So this will
01:20:32 Speaker 33: definitely enhance that response into that
01:20:33 Speaker 33: area, and again, that's balancing out
01:20:34 Speaker 33: you know the low call volume.
01:20:37 Speaker 33: You know, a low call volume
01:20:39 Speaker 33: versus a a large area to
01:20:43 Speaker 33: cover. So the the site that
01:20:45 Speaker 33: was chosen was at the old
01:20:47 Speaker 33: sand dune at four nine four
01:20:53 Speaker 33: seven forty, Gray Road two, and
01:20:56 Speaker 33: we are we're at the final
01:21:01 Speaker 33: stages and leave of the land
01:21:03 Speaker 33: transfer now with Gray Highlands to
01:21:07 Speaker 33: the county. So we did a
01:21:12 Speaker 33: design build, a partial design build.
01:21:14 Speaker 33: for mechanical, electrical. We did a
01:21:16 Speaker 33: lot of the work as far
01:21:18 Speaker 33: as architectural ourselves. Aaron Whitney, in
01:21:20 Speaker 33: house, great work that he does.
01:21:22 Speaker 33: And we released the tender on
01:21:24 Speaker 33: August fifteenth, and we had the
01:21:25 Speaker 33: results back on September fifteenth. There
01:21:27 Speaker 33: was only one bidder, was Dom
01:21:30 Speaker 33: Construction, and they they met all
01:21:32 Speaker 33: the requirements of the bid. Our
01:21:34 Speaker 33: budget for this project was one
01:21:35 Speaker 33: point six million. The bid cost
01:21:37 Speaker 33: from Dom. came in over budget,
01:21:39 Speaker 33: came in at two million one
01:21:43 Speaker 33: hundred fifty-five thousand, or two million
01:21:45 Speaker 33: one hundred ninety-two thousand with HST.
01:21:46 Speaker 33: We're predicting the professional fees to
01:21:51 Speaker 33: be around two hundred thousand dollars,
01:21:52 Speaker 33: so that makes the total cost
01:21:55 Speaker 33: of the project two million three
01:21:58 Speaker 33: hundred ninety-two thousand, which is an
01:21:59 Speaker 33: overage of seven hundred eighty-six thousand
01:22:01 Speaker 33: one hundred dollars. This project will
01:22:03 Speaker 33: not be completed in twenty twenty-five,
01:22:05 Speaker 33: but if it's approved. it'll be
01:22:08 Speaker 33: moved over to the 2026 capital
01:22:09 Speaker 33: budget. So this project is funded
01:22:15 Speaker 33: completely from dementia. The overage will
01:22:18 Speaker 33: result in a dementia payment going
01:22:19 Speaker 33: from 114,000 to 169,800, which is
01:22:20 Speaker 33: an increase of 55,800. The budgets
01:22:22 Speaker 33: proposed for Aitken, Thornbury, and Cobble
01:22:24 Speaker 33: Beach will also be up. Will
01:22:26 Speaker 33: also be updated to match these
01:22:29 Speaker 33: new numbers, thinking that this may
01:22:31 Speaker 33: be the realistic cost going forward
01:22:33 Speaker 33: for these additional bases. And I
01:22:34 Speaker 33: would like to mention also, and
01:22:36 Speaker 33: we talked about that briefly before,
01:22:44 Speaker 33: but now more formal, we'll bring
01:22:46 Speaker 33: a report forward next week, or
01:22:49 Speaker 33: sorry, next council, that the Dundalk
01:22:51 Speaker 33: base we will have to build
01:22:52 Speaker 33: one there because the fire department
01:22:55 Speaker 33: needs the space, and we'll have
01:22:57 Speaker 33: to find a new location for
01:22:59 Speaker 33: for the Dundalk base. So these.
01:23:00 Speaker 33: So this part of these increases
01:23:01 Speaker 33: are offset by the grant around
01:23:03 Speaker 33: interest and for capital assets from
01:23:07 Speaker 33: the government. When you look at
01:23:09 Speaker 33: our annual increase to the Comprehensive
01:23:10 Speaker 33: Deployment Plan, that's where we pay
01:23:13 Speaker 33: the four hundred ten thousand dollars
01:23:14 Speaker 33: a year. When we build in
01:23:17 Speaker 33: these extra costs to the bases,
01:23:19 Speaker 33: that increase goes up twenty one
01:23:20 Speaker 33: thousand dollars one hundred to four
01:23:21 Speaker 33: hundred thirty one thousand dollars per
01:23:22 Speaker 33: year. So this just chart just
01:23:34 Speaker 34: shows the overage. Now we have
01:23:35 Speaker 34: talked with Dom. We have the
01:23:37 Speaker 10: ability to negotiate because there was
01:23:39 Speaker 10: only one bidder. And not included
01:23:40 Speaker 10: in this, we feel that we
01:23:46 Speaker 10: can find approximately two hundred thousand
01:23:48 Speaker 21: dollars in savings. Just some different
01:23:51 Speaker 21: things that Dom suggests that we
01:23:53 Speaker 21: can do, and we will continue
01:23:55 Speaker 21: to look for other cost savings
01:23:59 Speaker 21: as well as we work through
01:24:01 Speaker 21: the project if this is approved.
01:24:04 Speaker 21: The base is being built to
01:24:06 Speaker 21: net zero, and it does meet
01:24:09 Speaker 21: the requirements of the county to
01:24:12 Speaker 21: continue to build in these net
01:24:17 Speaker 33: zero. If we look at Durham,
01:24:19 Speaker 33: Durham, if we add solar there,
01:24:21 Speaker 33: and be the same with Feversham,
01:24:23 Speaker 33: it would be a net zero
01:24:26 Speaker 33: building. At this time, we don't
01:24:28 Speaker 33: have any additional funding for the
01:24:29 Speaker 33: solar. So this is what the
01:24:32 Speaker 33: base will look like, and. we
01:24:34 Speaker 33: are going to be building again
01:24:36 Speaker 33: with approval, these same basis. So
01:24:41 Speaker 33: hopefully that will save costs down
01:24:43 Speaker 33: the road. It's built for having
01:24:44 Speaker 33: two vehicles and the crew area
01:24:46 Speaker 33: for the ones that were able
01:24:48 Speaker 33: to make it to Durham will
01:24:49 Speaker 33: be similar to what the crew
01:24:50 Speaker 33: area is across the county. Questions.
01:24:52 Speaker 33: Okay, thank you very much for
01:24:53 Speaker 33: that introduction, and we'll put it
01:24:55 Speaker 33: out. to committee. The whole members
01:24:59 Speaker 33: for questions. We'll begin with Councillor
01:25:00 Speaker 33: McKay. Yes, thank you, Kevin. Thank
01:25:06 Speaker 35: you, Warden. I attended the open
01:25:07 Speaker 35: house in Durham, and it was
01:25:09 Speaker 35: stated that it is the state
01:25:14 Speaker 35: of the art. Plus, it was
01:25:18 Speaker 36: the main headquarters for supplies. So,
01:25:19 Speaker 36: these new ones that are being
01:25:20 Speaker 36: built are they on a smaller
01:25:22 Speaker 36: dimension? compared to the one in
01:25:24 Speaker 36: Durham, or would you have another
01:25:26 Speaker 36: one somewhere for main supply station
01:25:27 Speaker 36: too? Yeah, the one in Durham
01:25:28 Speaker 36: was meant to house the our
01:25:29 Speaker 36: logistics and supplies for the county
01:25:31 Speaker 36: as well as our sales supervisor.
01:25:32 Speaker 36: So this that base, that similar
01:25:33 Speaker 36: design, that layout, we will be
01:25:35 Speaker 36: cutting roughly a third of all
01:25:37 Speaker 36: these new bases, and that's roughly
01:25:39 Speaker 36: that extra portion that was meant.
01:25:40 Speaker 36: for maintenance and logistics—that's the
01:25:43 Speaker 36: third. We did change the orientation
01:25:45 Speaker 36: of the garage, so it's a
01:25:49 Speaker 36: true drive-through. So you're not always
01:25:54 Speaker 36: backing in. That was a suggestion
01:25:57 Speaker 36: from staff. It is—you know—you have
01:26:00 Speaker 36: this double-stack base, and you're always
01:26:03 Speaker 36: trying to move in front of
01:26:05 Speaker 36: another vehicle back in. This way,
01:26:06 Speaker 36: it's a true drive-through. So that's
01:26:08 Speaker 36: about the only other difference as
01:26:09 Speaker 36: well. Okay, thank you. I'll look
01:26:12 Speaker 36: around the room. We'll go to
01:26:14 Speaker 36: Councillor Gregg next. Thank you. My
01:26:17 Speaker 36: first question is: Can you expand
01:26:20 Speaker 36: upon what are the components that
01:26:22 Speaker 36: make up the $200,000 in discretionary
01:26:23 Speaker 36: cutbacks? I don't have the list
01:26:29 Speaker 36: in front of me, but I
01:26:31 Speaker 36: can go from memory if that's
01:26:35 Speaker 26: okay. Likely best. There was some
01:26:36 Speaker 26: contingency that we were able to
01:26:38 Speaker 26: reduce based upon our knowledge of
01:26:42 Speaker 26: what Durham's coming at. I wish
01:26:45 Speaker 26: I had the numbers to say
01:26:48 Speaker 26: today, but when we did the
01:26:52 Speaker 26: planning for Durham, I think. we
01:26:54 Speaker 26: did it really well, and we
01:26:56 Speaker 26: were able. We didn't have to
01:27:00 Speaker 26: use that contingency as much as
01:27:03 Speaker 26: what we thought. There's some civil
01:27:05 Speaker 26: work, and we're even looking at
01:27:09 Speaker 26: more now as far as the
01:27:11 Speaker 26: engineering around stormwater management. And we've
01:27:14 Speaker 26: we don't believe that we'll need
01:27:16 Speaker 26: the curbing. We've reduced concrete, and
01:27:21 Speaker 26: we'll change to to asphalt. There
01:27:23 Speaker 26: is reduced the flagpole, reduced the
01:27:25 Speaker 26: fence. We. we talked about the
01:27:28 Speaker 26: building itself about size and in
01:27:31 Speaker 26: talking with Dom, it's like you
01:27:33 Speaker 26: can obviously cut back size, they'll
01:27:34 Speaker 26: cut back some costs, but really
01:27:36 Speaker 26: because you need those major components,
01:27:40 Speaker 26: doesn't really change a lot. So
01:27:44 Speaker 26: we we we went we went
01:27:47 Speaker 26: down that road, but yeah, we
01:27:48 Speaker 26: tried tried to balance those best
01:27:51 Speaker 26: we could. Again, these these those
01:27:53 Speaker 26: savings are not part of that
01:27:56 Speaker 26: total right now. Hopefully that will.
01:27:59 Speaker 26: Thanks for that. So most of
01:28:03 Speaker 26: the savings are outside of the
01:28:05 Speaker 26: building envelope, effectively, from what I'm
01:28:07 Speaker 26: hearing, and I don't. I've got
01:28:11 Speaker 26: them wrote down here. I do
01:28:12 Speaker 26: have significant concerns here with, um,
01:28:16 Speaker 26: before percent professional fees. This is
01:28:19 Speaker 26: something that's 34% over budget with
01:28:22 Speaker 26: professional fees, 49% over budget, and
01:28:24 Speaker 26: it would be more palatable to
01:28:27 Speaker 26: me if there was. three or
01:28:30 Speaker 26: four bidders, but I am not
01:28:35 Speaker 26: comfortable in approving issuing a tender
01:28:37 Speaker 26: for for this project when we're
01:28:39 Speaker 26: effectively forty nine percent over budget.
01:28:41 Speaker 26: We've got some room for cutbacks,
01:28:45 Speaker 26: but you know thirty four percent
01:28:46 Speaker 26: before professional fees, thirty four percent
01:28:48 Speaker 26: with one tender. I think we
01:28:51 Speaker 26: need to take another run at
01:28:52 Speaker 26: this in the. future, and see
01:28:54 Speaker 26: what type of competition in the
01:28:56 Speaker 26: marketplace. I I think Kevin, you
01:29:02 Speaker 26: and your team internally are doing
01:29:03 Speaker 26: a great job of looking at
01:29:05 Speaker 26: where can we shave off some
01:29:11 Speaker 37: savings. And we're as Councillor McKay
01:29:14 Speaker 37: indicated, there is slightly reduced size
01:29:16 Speaker 37: from Durham. These bases going forward
01:29:19 Speaker 36: because it is a centralized place
01:29:20 Speaker 36: in Durham. But there's there's an
01:29:23 Speaker 36: element here that I'm concerned is.
01:29:24 Speaker 36: just because it's debenture, we should
01:29:27 Speaker 36: approve it, but it's it's inflated
01:29:29 Speaker 36: perhaps because there's just not competition
01:29:30 Speaker 36: right now that that was bidding.
01:29:37 Speaker 36: Any time that and it was
01:29:46 Speaker 36: Deputy Warden Mill mentioned earlier, you
01:29:51 Speaker 38: know, as it's not a sole
01:29:56 Speaker 38: source, but he had asked for
01:29:58 Speaker 38: convincing information on a sole sourcing
01:30:04 Speaker 38: item. One one one bidder is.
01:30:06 Speaker 38: also somewhat concerning too. It's it's
01:30:08 Speaker 38: always great to see competition that's
01:30:10 Speaker 38: transparently placed in front of council
01:30:15 Speaker 38: and the public. So at this
01:30:16 Speaker 38: time, I my biggest concern is
01:30:18 Speaker 38: is that there is one bidder.
01:30:20 Speaker 38: They do great work. However, I
01:30:21 Speaker 38: think we should go back out
01:30:28 Speaker 38: in the future and see what
01:30:30 Speaker 10: kind of engagement we do get
01:30:32 Speaker 10: from the from the public sector.
01:30:33 Speaker 10: or from the private sector, again,
01:30:34 Speaker 10: in terms of interest and and
01:30:36 Speaker 10: trying to shave down the the
01:30:37 Speaker 10: overall overall cost of the project.
01:30:40 Speaker 10: Okay, Director Mcnabb, did you want
01:30:43 Speaker 26: to comment, or any Director Spicer
01:30:45 Speaker 26: or anyone else? The budgeted amount
01:30:48 Speaker 26: of 1.6 was a calculation that
01:30:50 Speaker 26: we utilised by looking at other
01:30:52 Speaker 26: builds and price per square foot,
01:30:55 Speaker 26: and that. And that—that's one thing
01:30:56 Speaker 26: that maybe I take responsibility for—is
01:30:58 Speaker 26: that maybe that was lower than
01:30:59 Speaker 26: what we probably should have begun
01:31:00 Speaker 26: with. That's one thing about that,
01:31:02 Speaker 26: and that may be some little
01:31:03 Speaker 26: discrepancy in the prices. I'll just
01:31:05 Speaker 26: let Director Spicer come to the
01:31:08 Speaker 26: lectern. Thank you, Madam Warden. I
01:31:12 Speaker 26: I can understand and appreciate Councillor
01:31:14 Speaker 10: Greg's point as far as having
01:31:16 Speaker 10: one bid. It was publicly advertised,
01:31:18 Speaker 10: and we can't control who bids
01:31:19 Speaker 10: or who doesn't. My concern would
01:31:23 Speaker 10: be we've now got a a
01:31:24 Speaker 10: bid that has been publicly disclosed.
01:31:26 Speaker 10: You would have to wait for
01:31:28 Speaker 23: some period of time. before you
01:31:30 Speaker 23: would go back out because I'd
01:31:31 Speaker 23: be concerned that somebody would say
01:31:32 Speaker 23: that now we're bid shopping, and
01:31:33 Speaker 23: we've disclosed Dom's bid. Okay, thank
01:31:36 Speaker 23: you very much. There's a. I'll
01:31:38 Speaker 23: take that as a follow. I'm
01:31:39 Speaker 23: going to take a follow up
01:31:41 Speaker 23: from Councillor Greg on the same
01:31:43 Speaker 23: topic, and then I'm going to
01:31:44 Speaker 23: go over to Councillor McQueen next.
01:31:45 Speaker 23: And thank you. And I just
01:31:48 Speaker 23: want to be. You don't need
01:31:51 Speaker 23: to take response. You don't need
01:31:53 Speaker 23: to take responsibility at all, because
01:31:56 Speaker 23: it's nothing to to your work
01:31:58 Speaker 23: in preparing the document. I'm just
01:32:02 Speaker 23: commenting on the fact that you
01:32:04 Speaker 23: don't have anything that's coming in
01:32:07 Speaker 23: to be able compare the one
01:32:09 Speaker 23: bid to. So I just, when
01:32:10 Speaker 23: you said I'll take responsibility for
01:32:11 Speaker 23: that, I thought, no, you don't
01:32:13 Speaker 23: have to take responsibility for anything
01:32:14 Speaker 23: because there is no fault to
01:32:16 Speaker 23: be found with with anyone here.
01:32:17 Speaker 23: It's just the discomfort with with
01:32:20 Speaker 23: not having comparables. So, thanks, Kevin.
01:32:24 Speaker 23: Thank you. and I—I just wanted—I
01:32:26 Speaker 23: already had in the queue. Actually,
01:32:43 Speaker 05: virtually, Councillor Bordenyau is going to
01:32:44 Speaker 33: speak first, and then I'll go
01:32:46 Speaker 33: to Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Madam
01:32:48 Speaker 33: Warden, through you to County Council.
01:32:50 Speaker 33: Good morning again. I have less
01:32:52 Speaker 33: less concerns about the one bid
01:32:54 Speaker 33: only because they don't at the
01:32:56 Speaker 33: time when they're bidding, they don't
01:32:58 Speaker 33: know how many bids are going
01:33:05 Speaker 33: to be coming in. So there
01:33:07 Speaker 33: could be ten. The the the
01:33:10 Speaker 33: winning proponent does not know that.
01:33:11 Speaker 33: So that that's less of a
01:33:12 Speaker 23: concern to me. The one concern,
01:33:14 Speaker 23: if any. delay that we do,
01:33:18 Speaker 23: we know that construction costs more
01:33:20 Speaker 23: money. So if we delay any
01:33:21 Speaker 23: further, we've seen time and time
01:33:23 Speaker 23: again with with builds, with roads,
01:33:27 Speaker 39: each month, each quarter, each year
01:33:28 Speaker 39: will exponentially add to the cost
01:33:33 Speaker 39: of the same thing. My question
01:33:37 Speaker 39: is, I'm just reading. You're asking
01:33:39 Speaker 38: council for two million one hundred
01:33:42 Speaker 38: fifty-five thousand. The expected cost is
01:33:45 Speaker 38: two three nine two nine hundred.
01:33:46 Speaker 38: It's saying there will be a
01:33:50 Speaker 38: savings. of two hundred dollars, but
01:33:52 Speaker 38: that's not reflected in the chart.
01:33:53 Speaker 38: So, just for clarity purposes, is
01:33:57 Speaker 38: that the reason why the committee
01:34:01 Speaker 38: is being asked for two million
01:34:04 Speaker 38: one hundred fifty-five thousand as opposed
01:34:07 Speaker 38: to two three nine two nine
01:34:09 Speaker 38: hundred? Just for clarity purposes, through
01:34:10 Speaker 38: the the warden. Yeah. Yeah. Today,
01:34:12 Speaker 38: the award is to Dom for
01:34:14 Speaker 38: two million one hundred ninety-two thousand.
01:34:21 Speaker 38: But also bringing forward that the
01:34:22 Speaker 38: project we're expecting to be professional
01:34:25 Speaker 38: fees two hundred thousand. Again, that
01:34:28 Speaker 07: doesn't include any savings that we
01:34:29 Speaker 07: can work out with Dom. So
01:34:33 Speaker 07: the the award today is for
01:34:36 Speaker 07: Dom of two million one hundred
01:34:39 Speaker 07: ninety-two thousand. Okay. Is there any
01:34:40 Speaker 07: follow up to that? Councillor Bourneau.
01:34:43 Speaker 07: Yes, Madam Ward. Just so, just
01:34:46 Speaker 07: as a follow up. So, but
01:34:47 Speaker 07: we're being asked for two million
01:34:48 Speaker 07: one hundred and fifty five thousand
01:34:49 Speaker 07: dollars. So, where where would the
01:34:50 Speaker 07: reflection of the savings be at
01:34:52 Speaker 07: the end of the day, if
01:34:54 Speaker 07: there is any of the two
01:34:56 Speaker 07: hundred thousand? Okay, we'll just give
01:34:58 Speaker 07: a moment for Director Spicer and
01:34:59 Speaker 07: Director McNaught to come forward with
01:35:01 Speaker 07: a response to that. Through you,
01:35:03 Speaker 07: Madam Warden, to respond to Councillor
01:35:06 Speaker 07: Bourdonneau's question, what you're being asked
01:35:07 Speaker 07: for is to approve the award
01:35:10 Speaker 07: of two million one hundred and
01:35:11 Speaker 07: fifty-five thousand. And so, the the
01:35:12 Speaker 07: chart that you've seen on page
01:35:13 Speaker 07: three of the report, the expected
01:35:18 Speaker 07: costs include the non-rebatable HST, and
01:35:19 Speaker 07: if we find the savings that
01:35:21 Speaker 07: Director McNab has identified. Councillor McNab
01:35:24 Speaker 07: has identified those would be in
01:35:26 Speaker 07: the form of negative change orders
01:35:27 Speaker 07: that would reduce the total value
01:35:30 Speaker 07: of the contract. But the award
01:35:32 Speaker 07: today would be the two million
01:35:33 Speaker 07: one hundred fifty-five thousand, excluding HST.
01:35:35 Speaker 07: Okay. Thank you. Next, we'll go
01:35:36 Speaker 07: to Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Madam
01:35:39 Speaker 07: Warden. A couple things. Start off
01:35:40 Speaker 07: with County Council is only paying
01:35:43 Speaker 07: two dollars for the land. Same.
01:35:45 Speaker 07: So I think just going back
01:35:47 Speaker 07: to comes from Berganov with regards
01:35:49 Speaker 07: to process. I think we have
01:35:50 Speaker 07: to protect our process because I
01:35:51 Speaker 07: think in fairness to dome construction,
01:35:53 Speaker 07: which has been in business for
01:35:55 Speaker 07: a long time, they've been doing
01:35:59 Speaker 07: a lot of municipal buildings, a
01:36:01 Speaker 07: lot of buildings. So I don't
01:36:02 Speaker 07: think there's any debate of their
01:36:03 Speaker 07: quality of work. You know, they
01:36:06 Speaker 07: had no indication or knowledge that
01:36:07 Speaker 07: they're they only sold bitter until
01:36:08 Speaker 07: so it comes out. So I
01:36:09 Speaker 07: don't think there's any fault of
01:36:11 Speaker 07: anybody there. Obviously. it's it's unfortunate
01:36:14 Speaker 07: that it's higher than what was
01:36:16 Speaker 07: budgeted, but I think we look
01:36:17 Speaker 07: at last couple years, construction costs
01:36:19 Speaker 07: are continuing to rise, and everything
01:36:20 Speaker 07: else. You know, just go to
01:36:22 Speaker 07: Home Depot and buy something you
01:36:24 Speaker 07: bought two years ago. Everything's out.
01:36:25 Speaker 07: The other thing I want to
01:36:26 Speaker 07: say is yes, what Kevin made
01:36:28 Speaker 07: a comment was this area, you
01:36:30 Speaker 07: know, has been an underserviced area,
01:36:33 Speaker 07: and I did raise it, and
01:36:35 Speaker 07: then we had we had a.
01:36:38 Speaker 07: company that did the study and
01:36:40 Speaker 07: showed improved that it was an
01:36:42 Speaker 07: underserved area. I know a number
01:36:43 Speaker 07: of years back there was a
01:36:45 Speaker 07: young man that was badly injured,
01:36:47 Speaker 07: and I know for the area
01:36:50 Speaker 07: with regards to either Thornbury, Markville,
01:36:52 Speaker 07: or Dundalk, time is of the
01:36:54 Speaker 07: essence when when somebody is seriously
01:36:57 Speaker 07: injured, and unfortunately he lost his
01:37:04 Speaker 07: life. And not saying is any
01:37:05 Speaker 07: fault of anybody, but there was
01:37:07 Speaker 07: a bit of a delay getting
01:37:08 Speaker 07: there, just getting to serve to
01:37:10 Speaker 07: serve that individual. And I remember
01:37:12 Speaker 36: the. Conversation about that with an
01:37:14 Speaker 36: individual, and you know, it's too
01:37:16 Speaker 36: bad. But obviously, the study showed
01:37:17 Speaker 36: that it was an underserved area,
01:37:25 Speaker 36: and traffic and everything in that
01:37:26 Speaker 36: area is growing. You know, with
01:37:28 Speaker 36: the growth in Blue Mountains and
01:37:30 Speaker 36: everything else, Gray Road Two, Thirty
01:37:31 Speaker 36: One, Gray Road Four, One Twenty
01:37:35 Speaker 36: Four. You know, it's just the
01:37:38 Speaker 36: traffic patterns have changed, and it's
01:37:40 Speaker 36: just more and more people that's
01:37:42 Speaker 36: travelling through the area. So, I
01:37:46 Speaker 40: think the justification is there. It's
01:37:47 Speaker 40: just unfortunate. It's a little higher
01:37:50 Speaker 40: than we are, but I I
01:37:51 Speaker 40: don't think we can wait. I
01:37:54 Speaker 40: think we need to move. forward.
01:37:57 Speaker 40: The other comment I do have
01:38:01 Speaker 40: for you, Kevin, is if there
01:38:04 Speaker 40: is a need, like just like
01:38:05 Speaker 40: the Dundalk building where they they
01:38:09 Speaker 40: need it for expanding their fire
01:38:11 Speaker 40: hall, can this building be added
01:38:12 Speaker 40: to an extra bay? Is it
01:38:15 Speaker 40: designed that way? Is there a
01:38:16 Speaker 40: possibility that somewhere down the future,
01:38:17 Speaker 40: just like the situation you you
01:38:19 Speaker 40: mentioned in in Dundalk, it is.
01:38:21 Speaker 40: Is I guess anything can be
01:38:23 Speaker 40: added to, but is there any
01:38:25 Speaker 40: any incorporation of that? ever being
01:38:27 Speaker 40: incorporated into this building. I also
01:38:29 Speaker 40: don't have the information. I can
01:38:30 Speaker 40: answer that. I would think you
01:38:32 Speaker 40: could be able to add beside
01:38:34 Speaker 40: it, but it also needs on
01:38:36 Speaker 40: size of land and those type
01:38:39 Speaker 40: of things. But I also don't
01:38:47 Speaker 40: have enough expertise enough to ask.
01:38:49 Speaker 33: Aaron would probably the best person
01:38:50 Speaker 33: to ask. I only asked it
01:38:52 Speaker 33: because somebody asked me to ask
01:38:53 Speaker 33: that question because that was a
01:38:56 Speaker 33: thought that somebody made to me,
01:38:58 Speaker 33: so I was asking the question
01:39:00 Speaker 33: on that part. Okay, thank you.
01:39:02 Speaker 33: So, as we focus in on
01:39:03 Speaker 33: our discussion on the question that's
01:39:04 Speaker 33: at hand here, we'll go to
01:39:06 Speaker 33: the Deputy Warden next. Thank you,
01:39:08 Speaker 33: Madam Warden, and thank you, Kevin,
01:39:10 Speaker 33: for the report. In there, you
01:39:12 Speaker 33: mentioned that this building and the
01:39:14 Speaker 33: Durham one, and indeed. And the
01:39:15 Speaker 33: Durham one, indeed, as well, will
01:39:16 Speaker 33: be net zero ready. I'm wondering
01:39:19 Speaker 33: how much that cost adds to
01:39:20 Speaker 33: the bill, because I can appreciate
01:39:26 Speaker 33: that we want to reduce our
01:39:29 Speaker 08: energy consumption. And the thought is,
01:39:30 Speaker 08: we could put solar panels on
01:39:33 Speaker 08: at a future date. But I
01:39:34 Speaker 08: think the reality is, most builds
01:39:38 Speaker 08: don't have that done. You either
01:39:39 Speaker 08: put them on when you're building
01:39:42 Speaker 08: the thing, or it doesn't happen.
01:39:43 Speaker 08: It's like adding. bays to it
01:39:45 Speaker 08: later; not likely going to happen.
01:39:50 Speaker 08: And as time goes on, it
01:39:53 Speaker 08: becomes less cost efficient to add
01:39:55 Speaker 08: new stuff to an old building.
01:39:57 Speaker 08: So I'm just wondering: is there
01:40:00 Speaker 08: a potential if we're not going
01:40:01 Speaker 08: to put the panels on now,
01:40:05 Speaker 08: would there be some savings in
01:40:05 Speaker 08: not allowing the building to do
01:40:08 Speaker 08: that in the near future? Please.
01:40:10 Speaker 08: Yes, that is something we could
01:40:11 Speaker 08: look at. One thing that we
01:40:17 Speaker 08: were wanting to do, and we're
01:40:18 Speaker 33: still working through, is looking for
01:40:20 Speaker 33: grants to for these net zero
01:40:22 Speaker 33: initiatives. With that, would cover the
01:40:25 Speaker 33: cost. Solar for Durham, I believe,
01:40:27 Speaker 33: was two hundred twenty five thousand.
01:40:28 Speaker 33: That you know we'd be able
01:40:30 Speaker 33: to get a grant. Hopefully, let
01:40:31 Speaker 33: someday that working through that work
01:40:33 Speaker 33: to be able to get to
01:40:34 Speaker 33: get to a net zero. But
01:40:36 Speaker 33: is it something that could be
01:40:38 Speaker 33: taken out? We could. Like I
01:40:41 Speaker 33: think that's something we look at.
01:40:42 Speaker 33: Things like EV chargers and I
01:40:44 Speaker 33: guess you look at heat pumps
01:40:48 Speaker 33: and stuff like that, and types
01:40:49 Speaker 33: of windows and wall thickness. Okay,
01:40:51 Speaker 33: thank you. Looking around the room,
01:40:54 Speaker 33: I don't see any further hands
01:40:57 Speaker 33: up nor online. Okay, I think
01:40:59 Speaker 33: we're ready. Call that question. Then
01:41:02 Speaker 33: all those in favour? Okay, and
01:41:03 Speaker 33: that motion is carried. Thank you.
01:41:05 Speaker 33: All right. So Director McNab, don't
01:41:08 Speaker 33: go far. We'll have a look
7.b PSR-CW-07-25 Additional Funding to Support SOS and Extended Services
Council considered a report recommending the receipt of additional funding to support Safe and Sound (SOS) and extended services through partner agencies until March 31st, 2026. The proposed grant aims to fund two navigators in Owen Sound for seven days a week, provide administrative support, and purchase basic needs supplies like waterproof boots, coats, food, tents, and sleeping bags. Councillors discussed the necessity of this federal funding to address the opioid crisis without increasing property tax burdens, noting that while the current allocation is a six-month trial, successful outcomes could lead to requests for sustained provincial or federal support.
01:41:11 Speaker 33: at number seven B here. It's
01:41:14 Speaker 33: recommended that report PSRCW 0725, being
01:41:15 Speaker 33: a report on additional funding to
01:41:18 Speaker 33: support SOS and extended services, be
01:41:20 Speaker 33: received, and that the funds be
01:41:21 Speaker 33: flowed to partner agencies as outlined
01:41:23 Speaker 33: in the funding agreement that ends
01:41:26 Speaker 33: March 31st, 2026. May I ask
01:41:28 Speaker 33: for a mover and a seconder?
01:41:29 Speaker 33: Moved by Councillor Dicker, seconded by
01:41:30 Speaker 33: the Deputy Warden. It's now on
01:41:35 Speaker 33: the floor for discussion. And Director
01:41:37 Speaker 33: McNab, over to you. Okay, happy
01:41:44 Speaker 33: to be here to talk about
01:41:46 Speaker 33: this this morning. You remember earlier
01:41:51 Speaker 33: this year we were approved for
01:41:52 Speaker 33: funding to increase our response to
01:41:53 Speaker 33: the opioid crisis, and we were
01:41:56 Speaker 33: able to move our supportive outreach
01:42:02 Speaker 26: services to seven days a week.
01:42:05 Speaker 26: Which we're still, you know, working
01:42:05 Speaker 26: through that and getting the staffing
01:42:07 Speaker 26: up to date to do that,
01:42:11 Speaker 26: but also increasing the resources to
01:42:12 Speaker 26: be able to respond to that
01:42:13 Speaker 26: emergency. Part of the work that
01:42:17 Speaker 26: we're doing, we were asked about.
01:42:20 Speaker 26: doing additional work again to target,
01:42:22 Speaker 26: you know, the overdose crisis. So
01:42:24 Speaker 26: we did put in for additional
01:42:27 Speaker 26: funding on top of what we've
01:42:28 Speaker 26: already received. This would to further
01:42:30 Speaker 26: support initiatives within the county. What
01:42:33 Speaker 26: it will do is support a
01:42:34 Speaker 26: navigator programme in in the city
01:42:36 Speaker 26: of Owen Sound to have two
01:42:37 Speaker 26: navigators on seven days a week
01:42:39 Speaker 26: to support people. It also is
01:42:40 Speaker 26: to support treatments space at Safe
01:42:43 Speaker 26: and Sound. for SOS, it'll give
01:42:47 Speaker 26: us ability to have some administrative
01:42:49 Speaker 26: support for the team. The team's
01:42:51 Speaker 26: growing to be able to dedicate
01:42:58 Speaker 26: it, as opposed to being off
01:43:00 Speaker 26: the side of someone's desk, and
01:43:01 Speaker 26: also be able to increase the
01:43:04 Speaker 26: number of amount of basic needs
01:43:06 Speaker 33: to people to be able to
01:43:08 Speaker 33: start doing that. So this is
01:43:09 Speaker 33: 100% funded through this funding grant,
01:43:11 Speaker 33: and it will go until March
01:43:12 Speaker 33: 31st, 2026. Okay, thank you very
01:43:15 Speaker 33: much. So we do have it
01:43:17 Speaker 33: out open for discussion. Any discussion?
01:43:19 Speaker 33: Okay, so we're going to begin
01:43:19 Speaker 33: with Councillor Greg, then go to
01:43:21 Speaker 33: Councillor Eccles. Thank you. Through the
01:43:22 Speaker 33: Warden, two key questions, Kevin. Some
01:43:25 Speaker 33: of the I'm certainly aware within
01:43:27 Speaker 33: our own sound of some of
01:43:29 Speaker 33: the concerns of the business community
01:43:31 Speaker 33: in terms of individual. In terms
01:43:33 Speaker 33: of individuals, particularly at the start
01:43:35 Speaker 33: of the day, in front of
01:43:37 Speaker 33: businesses and the social navigators here
01:43:39 Speaker 33: spoken to in in the report,
01:43:40 Speaker 33: will support that. Could you expand
01:43:42 Speaker 33: more so on terms of what
01:43:43 Speaker 33: that what their job would look
01:43:44 Speaker 33: like beyond that? Because upfront, that's
01:43:45 Speaker 33: the most familiarity is to the
01:43:47 Speaker 33: pressing need is businesses to like
01:43:50 Speaker 33: we need support first thing in
01:43:52 Speaker 33: the morning to be able to
01:43:54 Speaker 33: to open our doors. Once the
01:43:56 Speaker 33: day starts, the day is different
01:43:58 Speaker 33: than first thing in the morning.
01:44:02 Speaker 33: And also, could you expand on
01:44:04 Speaker 33: what ninety-four thousand dollars in materials,
01:44:07 Speaker 33: supplies, equipment looks like? What is
01:44:12 Speaker 33: that? Because this is just till
01:44:17 Speaker 33: March, so I guess effectively five
01:44:19 Speaker 33: five months. So, thanks. Yes. So
01:44:21 Speaker 33: the navigators, the the main role
01:44:22 Speaker 33: of that is to help the
01:44:25 Speaker 33: people that are that are unhoused,
01:44:27 Speaker 33: community members that. need support in
01:44:28 Speaker 33: the community, so they would be
01:44:30 Speaker 33: working with them not just in
01:44:33 Speaker 33: the morning but all day long
01:44:34 Speaker 33: to be able to connect them
01:44:36 Speaker 33: to supports and to you know
01:44:38 Speaker 33: meet their needs. Also, the big
01:44:50 Speaker 41: thing would be doing referrals, but
01:44:51 Speaker 26: they could do a number of
01:44:52 Speaker 26: different things. They can do sharps
01:44:54 Speaker 26: cleanup. They can, if there was
01:44:55 Speaker 26: items left, they can work with
01:44:58 Speaker 26: that. Again, the the big thing
01:45:00 Speaker 26: is helping those community members, which
01:45:02 Speaker 26: ultimately you help them. That helps
01:45:03 Speaker 26: everybody, and so that's that's the
01:45:06 Speaker 26: main plan of this. this is
01:45:10 Speaker 26: something that's been proposed by at
01:45:14 Speaker 26: least two agencies before. It's more
01:45:16 Speaker 26: like it's a trial to see
01:45:18 Speaker 26: how it goes. So I think
01:45:20 Speaker 26: it's a good opportunity to have
01:45:22 Speaker 26: funding to be able to do
01:45:23 Speaker 26: that and see what those outcomes
01:45:26 Speaker 26: are like from it. The basic
01:45:29 Speaker 26: needs it could be from clothes.
01:45:31 Speaker 26: Right, we're getting waterproof boots. We've
01:45:33 Speaker 26: seen a lot of medical concerns
01:45:34 Speaker 26: around wet feet with people that
01:45:37 Speaker 26: live outside, but they don't have
01:45:38 Speaker 26: waterproof boots. Significant money around that.
01:45:44 Speaker 26: Coats, food. There are some. you
01:45:48 Speaker 26: know, us as far as like
01:45:52 Speaker 26: there's supplies. In that is, there's
01:45:53 Speaker 42: a food part of that. There's
01:45:55 Speaker 42: tents, sleeping bags, for people that
01:46:00 Speaker 42: are living outside to be able
01:46:02 Speaker 42: to do that. So yeah, there's
01:46:05 Speaker 42: a number of items. A whole
01:46:07 Speaker 42: list, and we have to spend
01:46:09 Speaker 42: it by then, and we'll do
01:46:11 Speaker 42: our best to distribute it. But
01:46:13 Speaker 42: you know, obviously, we will. ensure
01:46:18 Speaker 42: it goes. You know, it means
01:46:21 Speaker 42: I had it by March, but
01:46:24 Speaker 42: we'll have it, and it'll ultimately
01:46:27 Speaker 42: be able to be carried on.
01:46:30 Speaker 42: On. Well, sorry. Okay, thank you
01:46:34 Speaker 42: for expanding on that, Kevin. I'm
01:46:39 Speaker 42: glad to hear about the additional
01:46:40 Speaker 42: help in the community in terms
01:46:42 Speaker 42: of just clean up. Just a
01:46:44 Speaker 42: week ago, Saturday, I was through
01:46:47 Speaker 42: the. Julie MacArthur Rec Centre, and
01:46:51 Speaker 42: there's individuals doing drugs in the
01:46:55 Speaker 42: community at the skateboard park. That's
01:46:57 Speaker 42: not a very welcoming scene for
01:47:01 Speaker 42: people that want to have fun
01:47:06 Speaker 42: outdoors through in great weather at
01:47:11 Speaker 42: the skateboard park. And it's a
01:47:14 Speaker 42: it's been a certainly a drain,
01:47:16 Speaker 42: a huge drain on city staff
01:47:20 Speaker 42: for for several years as they
01:47:22 Speaker 42: try to respond to these ongoing
01:47:25 Speaker 42: items 24 hours a day, and
01:47:28 Speaker 42: and that's. an instance that just
01:47:32 Speaker 42: shines light on what kind of
01:47:35 Speaker 42: challenges exist in the community from
01:47:36 Speaker 42: from some of the behaviours there.
01:47:40 Speaker 42: So thanks. Good to hear that
01:47:45 Speaker 42: kind of support is also something
01:47:46 Speaker 42: that this this will complement. Thanks.
01:47:49 Speaker 42: We'll go to Councillor Eccles. Thank
01:47:52 Speaker 42: you, Madam Warden. Through you, there's
01:47:53 Speaker 42: no doubt there's a need in
01:47:56 Speaker 42: our community for this opioid crisis.
01:47:57 Speaker 42: My fear was one that I've
01:48:00 Speaker 42: shared maybe with this council a
01:48:03 Speaker 42: couple of times and continually for
01:48:06 Speaker 42: a number of years. Here we
01:48:08 Speaker 42: have funding, federal funding, coming at
01:48:12 Speaker 42: a hundred percent for six months
01:48:14 Speaker 42: for us to expand our SOS
01:48:17 Speaker 42: programme. Is this a healthcare issue?
01:48:19 Speaker 42: In my mind, yes, it is.
01:48:26 Speaker 42: Property tax supposed to look after
01:48:28 Speaker 42: healthcare. How much downloading is this?
01:48:29 Speaker 42: Great, we're getting into it for
01:48:32 Speaker 42: six months. Six years from now,
01:48:34 Speaker 42: council around here, which I may
01:48:35 Speaker 42: be here, I may not be
01:48:37 Speaker 42: here, be able to express to
01:48:44 Speaker 42: them, how did we get to
01:48:46 Speaker 42: this? We're spending eight and a
01:48:53 Speaker 42: half million dollars. We've had to
01:48:54 Speaker 42: delay building ambulance. base because we
01:48:56 Speaker 42: haven't got any money because our
01:48:59 Speaker 33: paramedics are running around doing healthcare
01:49:01 Speaker 33: issues. It it's a slippery slope.
01:49:03 Speaker 33: It's one that I we need
01:49:04 Speaker 33: it, but do we need those
01:49:05 Speaker 33: that are supposed to be looking
01:49:07 Speaker 33: after this? It's the guaranteed funding.
01:49:10 Speaker 33: I guess. we're probably the best,
01:49:11 Speaker 33: our paramedics to deliver the service,
01:49:13 Speaker 33: and I don't think there's any
01:49:15 Speaker 33: question to that. But how much
01:49:20 Speaker 33: can we deliver, and take as
01:49:23 Speaker 33: a download from the province, from
01:49:24 Speaker 33: the feds, to keep doing their
01:49:26 Speaker 33: job, to the taxpayer? Maybe we
01:49:28 Speaker 33: should go to the feds and
01:49:31 Speaker 33: to Doug Ford, and say, we
01:49:34 Speaker 33: need more. of those that are
01:49:37 Speaker 33: breaking the law by speeding, so
01:49:40 Speaker 33: that we can have the funds
01:49:41 Speaker 33: to be able to do their
01:49:44 Speaker 33: job. That was a little bit
01:49:47 Speaker 33: in jest, but the idea of
01:49:49 Speaker 33: this being a six-month, hundred percent
01:49:51 Speaker 33: funded, once we're into it, it's
01:49:53 Speaker 33: going to be very hard to
01:49:56 Speaker 33: get out of it. Extremely hard
01:49:58 Speaker 33: to get out of it, and
01:50:00 Speaker 33: then it falls. to the property
01:50:01 Speaker 33: taxpayers to support it. That's
01:50:03 Speaker 33: my fear. I will be supporting
01:50:05 Speaker 33: it at this point in time,
01:50:07 Speaker 33: but it's one thing to look
01:50:08 Speaker 33: down. We've got to keep the
01:50:17 Speaker 33: pressure on. Who should be looking
01:50:20 Speaker 13: after it? We're delivering a service.
01:50:23 Speaker 13: We're not building a service. Okay.
01:50:25 Speaker 13: Thank you, Director Murtha. Did you
01:50:28 Speaker 13: want to comment, Charles? Did you
01:50:30 Speaker 13: want to comment, or yeah, I
01:50:32 Speaker 13: don't disagree. This is health, but
01:50:32 Speaker 13: it's also social services as well.
01:50:34 Speaker 13: Housing first, social support means a
01:50:36 Speaker 13: lot. Like if we can't support
01:50:37 Speaker 13: people in housing and social services,
01:50:40 Speaker 13: a lot of the work we
01:50:41 Speaker 13: do in health really doesn't add
01:50:42 Speaker 13: up. And so it's tackling that.
01:50:44 Speaker 13: This, really, to tell you the
01:50:47 Speaker 13: truth, a lot of these enhancements,
01:50:50 Speaker 13: paramedic services is only one small
01:50:52 Speaker 13: piece of pie. We work with
01:50:53 Speaker 13: partners. CMHA, Bright Shores, and the
01:50:55 Speaker 13: United Way, Safe and Sound. We
01:50:57 Speaker 13: work with public health, and there's
01:50:58 Speaker 13: 25 partners beyond that. This is
01:51:00 Speaker 13: something that's very complex and requires
01:51:04 Speaker 30: a lot of agencies to to
01:51:07 Speaker 30: address. This funding will go till
01:51:09 Speaker 30: this specific funding goes to March
01:51:13 Speaker 30: 31st, 2026. But we do have
01:51:15 Speaker 24: funding for seven days a week
01:51:20 Speaker 24: until mid-January 2027. So it does
01:51:24 Speaker 24: it is longer. and our SOS
01:51:26 Speaker 24: funding. We've been fortunate. That is
01:51:28 Speaker 24: permanent funding. That is base funding.
01:51:30 Speaker 24: It's not. It's 100 funded by
01:51:33 Speaker 24: the province. So that is something
01:51:35 Speaker 24: that even without this, we'll still
01:51:39 Speaker 24: have that programme of the core
01:51:43 Speaker 24: of four days a week with
01:51:45 Speaker 24: our paramedic, nurse practitioner, mental health
01:51:47 Speaker 24: counselors, and social navigator. That that
01:51:50 Speaker 24: is on public funding, considered base.
01:51:53 Speaker 24: These these have just been in
01:51:59 Speaker 24: addition to. Through you, Warden, and
01:52:01 Speaker 24: further to Director McNab, indicated earlier
01:52:03 Speaker 24: that this this is a trial
01:52:05 Speaker 43: to see if some of these
01:52:09 Speaker 43: these measures can can can work.
01:52:12 Speaker 43: I think that'll hopefully provide us,
01:52:14 Speaker 43: if it's successful, provide us with
01:52:16 Speaker 43: some further evidence to be able
01:52:19 Speaker 43: to go to the provincial and
01:52:21 Speaker 43: federal government to say that we
01:52:22 Speaker 43: need some sustained funding in order
01:52:23 Speaker 43: to keep these programmemes going. So
01:52:26 Speaker 43: I think I think that's something
01:52:28 Speaker 43: that's just to keep in mind.
01:52:31 Speaker 43: I guess. In terms of, it
01:52:33 Speaker 43: is it is on a trial
01:52:36 Speaker 43: basis to to test this out.
01:52:37 Speaker 43: We think this will be very
01:52:40 Speaker 43: successful, but we'll be able to
01:52:42 Speaker 43: have that evidence and true data
01:52:43 Speaker 43: to be able to report back
01:52:45 Speaker 43: to the province and federal government
01:52:46 Speaker 43: to say we need sustained funding
01:52:47 Speaker 43: to keep this going. Okay, we'll
01:52:56 Speaker 43: go to Councillor Dobrine and then
01:53:02 Speaker 43: to Councillor Body. Thank you, and
01:53:03 Speaker 22: through you, Warden Matrasov. Matrosov, to
01:53:06 Speaker 22: that point, with regard to collecting
01:53:09 Speaker 22: the data to support ongoing the
01:53:11 Speaker 22: ongoing service, would we have sufficient
01:53:12 Speaker 22: indication by Roma that would allow
01:53:15 Speaker 22: us to have a delegation at
01:53:17 Speaker 22: that point in time, or consider
01:53:22 Speaker 22: a delegation to present some of
01:53:24 Speaker 22: the preliminary findings? Because if the
01:53:27 Speaker 22: funding is going to expire in
01:53:30 Speaker 22: March, then what? We could maybe
01:53:33 Speaker 22: provide the data, and the pilot
01:53:35 Speaker 22: could be extended, or you know,
01:53:37 Speaker 22: more permanent funding. It's perhaps not
01:53:40 Speaker 22: an answer we can arrive at
01:53:42 Speaker 22: today, but something to consider. Through
01:53:43 Speaker 22: you, Warden. Thank you for that
01:53:44 Speaker 22: question, Councillor Debrine. As part of
01:53:46 Speaker 22: the initial funding that we received
01:53:47 Speaker 22: from the federal government, was to
01:53:50 Speaker 22: fund. a a 0.25 or part-time
01:53:52 Speaker 22: data analyst to help track and
01:53:54 Speaker 22: and report on some of this
01:53:55 Speaker 22: data. Whether or not we'll have
01:53:56 Speaker 22: enough results pre-Roma for for this
01:54:01 Speaker 22: particular piece will be a bit
01:54:04 Speaker 22: of a question mark. But hopefully,
01:54:06 Speaker 22: we'll have these at least some
01:54:08 Speaker 22: initial results that may inform a
01:54:10 Speaker 22: delegation brief if that's where council
01:54:12 Speaker 22: wants to consider that. Those those
01:54:15 Speaker 22: delegation requests are will likely be
01:54:16 Speaker 22: discussed by council usually in November.
01:54:17 Speaker 22: So usually in November, so we're
01:54:18 Speaker 22: already tracking a list of potential
01:54:20 Speaker 22: delegation requests based on council's discussions.
01:54:21 Speaker 22: This is one that we can
01:54:22 Speaker 22: potentially add to that list and
01:54:23 Speaker 22: see what data and information that
01:54:24 Speaker 22: we have at that time to
01:54:26 Speaker 22: be able to go forward to
01:54:28 Speaker 22: Roma. Councillor Body, I don't know
01:54:30 Speaker 22: where to begin. Clearly, there's people
01:54:34 Speaker 22: that are homeless. Clearly, there's people.
01:54:36 Speaker 22: that have mental health and drug
01:54:38 Speaker 22: addictions, and clearly they're coming from
01:54:40 Speaker 22: all over Grey County, mostly to
01:54:41 Speaker 22: One Sound and to Hanover, where
01:54:43 Speaker 22: they're most visible because we have
01:54:44 Speaker 22: the services that are here. I've
01:54:46 Speaker 22: said it in this circle before,
01:54:48 Speaker 22: but Grey County is kicking the
01:54:50 Speaker 22: living crap out of every other
01:54:53 Speaker 22: municipality in Ontario with these types
01:54:55 Speaker 22: of programmemes, yet. my telephone lights
01:54:57 Speaker 22: up at City Hall, telling me
01:54:59 Speaker 22: that we're not doing anything. I've
01:55:01 Speaker 22: got a ten thousand word essay
01:55:06 Speaker 22: that I send out to people,
01:55:07 Speaker 22: and of course I don't get
01:55:10 Speaker 22: a thanks for it after they
01:55:13 Speaker 22: just disappeared. The last phone call
01:55:14 Speaker 22: I got was a complaint about
01:55:16 Speaker 22: somebody homeless on an electric bicycle
01:55:18 Speaker 22: between Fenton and Park Street, which
01:55:21 Speaker 22: is in Georgetown blocks. They didn't
01:55:23 Speaker 22: leave a name, so I couldn't
01:55:26 Speaker 22: even tell them to phone Sue.
01:55:28 Speaker 22: I really wish. the Grey County
01:55:29 Speaker 22: would start blasting communications out and
01:55:31 Speaker 22: how well we're doing, and all
01:55:33 Speaker 22: the things that are going on.
01:55:36 Speaker 22: We've said this before, but we're
01:55:38 Speaker 22: not taking credit for our achievements.
01:55:40 Speaker 22: People in On Sound don't stick
01:55:44 Speaker 22: their head above the top of
01:55:46 Speaker 22: the hill to see which way
01:55:48 Speaker 22: the wind's blowing half the time,
01:55:50 Speaker 22: and they don't go to Ottawa,
01:55:52 Speaker 22: they don't go to Berry, they
01:55:58 Speaker 22: don't go to Sudbury, they don't
01:56:00 Speaker 22: go to Guelph, they don't go
01:56:01 Speaker 22: to London, they don't go to
01:56:03 Speaker 22: these other places. And we're doing
01:56:05 Speaker 22: extremely well in this community. We
01:56:07 Speaker 10: have very few people, frankly, per
01:56:09 Speaker 10: capita, that have problems on the
01:56:10 Speaker 10: street. Yes, they're there. I grew
01:56:11 Speaker 10: up in a family that had
01:56:15 Speaker 10: a men's clothing store in Main
01:56:16 Speaker 10: Street that started six years before
01:56:19 Speaker 10: I was born, and we closed
01:56:21 Speaker 10: it down about one year before
01:56:24 Speaker 10: I started practicing law in downtown
01:56:26 Speaker 10: Oceansound. So pretty well, my
01:56:28 Speaker 10: entire life, I've been in business
01:56:31 Speaker 10: in downtown Oceansound. I remember
01:56:33 Speaker 10: alcoholics that were on the street.
01:56:35 Speaker 10: I was talking to Louis Guevara
01:56:37 Speaker 10: the other day. We're naming them.
01:56:38 Speaker 10: There has always been people on
01:56:40 Speaker 10: the street. One Frankie that used
01:56:42 Speaker 10: to put a window through a
01:56:43 Speaker 10: Briggs Briggs jewelry store. No, the
01:56:45 Speaker 10: other one, someone else's jewelry store.
01:56:47 Speaker 10: Every November when it got cold,
01:56:48 Speaker 10: so he'd get sentenced until the
01:56:52 Speaker 10: spring, and then be back out.
01:56:54 Speaker 10: We're doing extremely well. We're
01:56:57 Speaker 10: never going to eradicate homelessness, mental
01:56:58 Speaker 10: health, or addictions. It is worse
01:57:00 Speaker 44: since COVID. We're doing. extremely well
01:57:02 Speaker 44: in Gray County, and we need
01:57:04 Speaker 44: to take credit for that. And
01:57:07 Speaker 44: we need to start communicating that
01:57:08 Speaker 44: more so that people understand all
01:57:10 Speaker 44: the programmemes that are going into
01:57:12 Speaker 44: this, and this one being another
01:57:14 Speaker 44: trial that hopefully works. People will
01:57:17 Speaker 44: find that little thing that isn't
01:57:19 Speaker 44: working perfectly and criticize it, but
01:57:21 Speaker 44: overall, we're doing extremely well,
01:57:25 Speaker 44: and I think we need
01:57:27 Speaker 44: to toot the horn.
01:57:29 Speaker 44: Thanks. Thank you very much, and
01:57:32 Speaker 44: with that, I don't see any
01:57:36 Speaker 44: further hands up for discussion, so
01:57:38 Speaker 44: I'm going to call call this
01:57:40 Speaker 44: question. All those in favour, and
01:57:44 Speaker 44: that motion is carried. Thank you
01:57:46 Speaker 44: very much, Director McNabb. So, what
01:57:49 Speaker 44: I would like to do is
01:57:50 Speaker 44: I would like to introduce the
01:57:54 Speaker 44: next item, and Madam Clerk will
01:57:57 Speaker 44: have the honourary position of just
01:57:59 Speaker 44: before lunch. Director Taylor will have
01:58:02 Speaker 44: to share on this day. So,
01:58:04 Speaker 44: it is recommended that Gray County,
7.c Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee minutes dated September 18, 2025
Council adopted the Gray County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee minutes dated September 18, 2025, which endorsed a biennial accessibility compliance report covering employment and transportation standards. The committee reviewed reconstruction plans for Gray Road 12 in Markdale to install drop curbs and rest areas between Wellington Ave and Terra Drive. Staff also presented a renovation project at Gray Gables ensuring accessible vestibules, door widths, and washroom features. Finally, the group endorsed a new multi-year accessibility plan addressing policies, customer service, and public procurement standards.
01:58:06 Speaker 44: that the Gray County Joint Accessibility
01:58:08 Speaker 44: Advisory Committee meeting minutes dated September
01:58:11 Speaker 44: 18, 2025, be adopted as presented,
01:58:13 Speaker 44: and the following resolutions contained therein
01:58:14 Speaker 44: be endorsed. There are six items
01:58:16 Speaker 44: that are there that have been
01:58:18 Speaker 44: published, and the minutes have been
01:58:19 Speaker 44: circulated duly and are printed here
01:58:24 Speaker 44: on the agenda. So, with that,
01:58:27 Speaker 44: I will ask for a mover
01:58:30 Speaker 44: and a seconder. Moved by Councillor
01:58:31 Speaker 44: Gregg, seconded by Councillor Dobreen. It's
01:58:34 Speaker 44: now on the floor for discussion,
01:58:35 Speaker 44: Madam Clerk. Thank you, and good
01:58:39 Speaker 44: morning, County Council. The Gray County
01:58:41 Speaker 44: Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee met on
01:58:43 Speaker 44: September 18th to discuss a number
01:58:47 Speaker 44: of items. The first one up
01:58:49 Speaker 44: was a report from Gray County
01:58:51 Speaker 44: on the accessibility compliance report, which
01:58:53 Speaker 44: has been submitted to or will
01:58:55 Speaker 44: be submitted to the Ministry of
01:58:59 Speaker 44: Seniors and Accessibility. It's a requiredment
01:59:01 Speaker 44: to be submitted every two years,
01:59:02 Speaker 44: and it's a self-assessment exercise that
01:59:04 Speaker 44: Gray County will undertake to look
01:59:07 Speaker 44: at its status of compliance with
01:59:11 Speaker 44: the. Status of compliance with accessibility
01:59:14 Speaker 44: requirements. The assessment asked questions around
01:59:16 Speaker 44: compliance with employment standards, transportation standards,
01:59:19 Speaker 44: information and communication standards, design of
01:59:21 Speaker 44: public spaces, and customer service.
01:59:25 Speaker 44: The second report was another report
01:59:27 Speaker 44: from Gray County regarding the reconstruction
01:59:30 Speaker 44: of Gray Road 12 in Markdale,
01:59:34 Speaker 44: and the report was seeking the
01:59:35 Speaker 44: feedback from the committee on pedestrian
01:59:39 Speaker 44: facilities and rest areas. along
01:59:41 Speaker 44: this portion of the road between
01:59:43 Speaker 44: Wellington Ave and Terra Drive. Staff
01:59:46 Speaker 44: noted there will be drop curbs
01:59:47 Speaker 44: and tactile plates at the crossings.
01:59:51 Speaker 44: There were questions addressed regarding the
01:59:53 Speaker 44: elevation of the retaining wall and
01:59:55 Speaker 26: nearby surroundings in order to determine
01:59:58 Speaker 26: the need for rest areas along
02:00:00 Speaker 26: that portion. And discussion about whether
02:00:02 Speaker 26: there should be one in front
02:00:03 Speaker 26: of the church or the trail
02:00:05 Speaker 26: parking lot. But overall, I think
02:00:08 Speaker 26: there was general consensus. that there
02:00:11 Speaker 26: should be a rest area along
02:00:13 Speaker 26: that section. The next report was
02:00:16 Speaker 26: from long-term care for the renovation
02:00:18 Speaker 26: taking place at Gray Gables in
02:00:21 Speaker 26: the Kids and Us space. They
02:00:23 Speaker 26: are Kids and Us is undertaking
02:00:24 Speaker 26: the renovation in the building, and
02:00:26 Speaker 26: the project was brought brought forward
02:00:28 Speaker 26: for review and comment. So there
02:00:30 Speaker 26: has been consideration given to sufficient
02:00:32 Speaker 26: turning radius in the vestibule.
02:00:34 Speaker 26: appropriate door sizes and widths, and
02:00:38 Speaker 26: minimizations of obstructions, and the design
02:00:42 Speaker 26: of an accessible washroom, and then
02:00:43 Speaker 26: new lighting being incorporated in as
02:00:45 Speaker 26: well. There were also comments shared
02:00:47 Speaker 10: on the importance of accessibility of
02:00:48 Speaker 10: the components within the washroom, in
02:00:52 Speaker 10: addition to just the general design
02:00:55 Speaker 10: of the washroom itself. The next
02:00:55 Speaker 10: item was the Westray Multi-Year Accessibility
02:00:59 Speaker 10: Plan. It is a brand new
02:01:05 Speaker 10: plan. as the past one has
02:01:06 Speaker 10: just expired, I believe, last
02:01:08 Speaker 10: year. And it considered review of
02:01:12 Speaker 10: policies, customer service, and accessibility, procurement.
02:01:14 Speaker 10: The staff and attendants spoke to
02:01:17 Speaker 10: the accessible features appearing on the
02:01:19 Speaker 10: website, and also noting their wish
02:01:21 Speaker 10: to hear from the public on
02:01:23 Speaker 10: any opportunities to hear to hear
02:01:25 Speaker 10: opportunities to improve accessibility standards in
02:01:26 Speaker 10: the municipality. And that was. the
02:01:27 Speaker 10: summary of that meeting. Happy to
02:01:29 Speaker 10: take any questions if there are
02:01:33 Speaker 10: any. Okay, thank you. Any questions
02:01:35 Speaker 10: regarding these minutes? We'll go to
02:01:37 Speaker 10: Councillor Greg. And just a comment,
02:01:40 Speaker 10: but the Gray Road Twelve project
02:01:45 Speaker 10: is a good example. This is
02:01:47 Speaker 38: a really good committee that did
02:01:50 Speaker 38: a really good job of finding
02:01:51 Speaker 38: the sweet spot in terms of
02:01:55 Speaker 38: the rest area discussion and trying
02:01:57 Speaker 38: to position the project to suit
02:02:01 Speaker 38: the. needs now and in the
02:02:04 Speaker 38: future, but avoiding the overbuilt aspect
02:02:07 Speaker 38: because you can overbuild and you
02:02:09 Speaker 38: can underbuild. But certainly, just my
02:02:12 Speaker 38: compliments to the committee at finding
02:02:15 Speaker 38: that what I think is really
02:02:16 Speaker 38: just the right sweet spot and
02:02:18 Speaker 38: that balance. So they had really
02:02:20 Speaker 38: good discussion and and just good
02:02:22 Speaker 38: to see all the various considerations
02:02:24 Speaker 38: in the recommendation. Thanks, chair. Okay.
02:02:28 Speaker 38: Thank you. Any other questions, comments?
02:02:29 Speaker 38: Okay, not seen any then. I'll
02:02:34 Speaker 38: call the question. All those in
02:02:37 Speaker 38: favour. That motion is carried. Thank
02:02:40 Speaker 38: you. Okay, so that brings us
02:02:46 Speaker 38: just up to noon then. So
02:02:48 Speaker 38: if we could. Okay. Well, I've
02:02:52 Speaker 38: just received word that we can
02:02:54 Speaker 38: go a little bit longer. We
02:02:57 Speaker 38: have one that will be item
7.d Budget and Finance Committee minutes dated September 24, 2025
The Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on September 24th concluded the adoption of minutes containing resolutions regarding capital presentations from Long Term Care and staffing requests for 2026 and 2027. Director Cornell presented a capital budget programme relying on building condition assessments, while Paul Mcqueen explained the utilization of provincial funding for comprehensive minor capital repairs to offset reserve costs. The committee reviewed draft budget timelines with the CAO, scheduled high-level capital project discussions for October 29th, and approved a motion carried by Councillor Carleton before breaking for lunch.
02:02:58 Speaker 38: seven D. Then. It's recommended that
02:03:00 Speaker 38: the Budget and Finance Committee meeting
02:03:02 Speaker 38: minutes dated. September 24, 2025, be
02:03:04 Speaker 38: adopted as presented, and the following
02:03:06 Speaker 38: resolutions be contained contained therein, be
02:03:07 Speaker 38: endorsed. I will not read out
02:03:11 Speaker 38: the eight items because they have
02:03:15 Speaker 38: been circulated, and they have been
02:03:17 Speaker 38: circulated both in the minutes and
02:03:21 Speaker 38: on the agenda. But I will
02:03:23 Speaker 38: look for a mover and a
02:03:26 Speaker 38: seconder so that we can begin
02:03:28 Speaker 38: discussion. Moved by Councillor Carleton, seconded
02:03:32 Speaker 38: seconded by Councillor Kevney, and it's
02:03:33 Speaker 08: on the floor for discussion. Welcome
02:03:35 Speaker 08: back to the lectern. Welcome back
02:03:36 Speaker 08: to the Lecter and Director Spicer.
02:03:40 Speaker 08: Thank you, Madam Warden. The Budget
02:03:42 Speaker 08: and Finance Committee met on September
02:03:42 Speaker 08: 24th. We had a number of
02:03:44 Speaker 08: things on the agenda. The first
02:03:47 Speaker 08: was a capital presentation by Long
02:03:49 Speaker 08: Term Care, and Director Cornell presented,
02:03:52 Speaker 08: and this was the final presentation
02:03:53 Speaker 08: from the the departments with significant
02:03:55 Speaker 08: capital budgets. She spoke about that
02:03:57 Speaker 08: they rely heavily on their building
02:03:59 Speaker 08: condition assessment reports to develop their
02:04:01 Speaker 08: capital budget programme, and highlighted that
02:04:03 Speaker 08: there is a source of funding
02:04:15 Speaker 05: from the province for comprehensive minor
02:04:17 Speaker 01: capital. It helps with minor repairs
02:04:19 Speaker 01: and upkeep of the home, and
02:04:21 Speaker 01: we've been utilising that fund to
02:04:24 Speaker 01: offset some of the costs for
02:04:26 Speaker 01: planned work that normally would come
02:04:29 Speaker 01: from their respective reserves. We then
02:04:31 Speaker 01: talked about. the 2026 and 2027
02:04:33 Speaker 01: budget assumptions and timelines report, and
02:04:34 Speaker 01: talked about the timeline where departments
02:04:36 Speaker 01: finance and are reviewing draft budgets
02:04:37 Speaker 01: with the CAO and Deputy CAO.
02:04:39 Speaker 01: That's ongoing and finishes up next
02:04:41 Speaker 01: Wednesday. We talked about at the
02:04:42 Speaker 01: October 29th Budget and Finance Committee.
02:04:45 Speaker 01: There'll be a high-level overview and
02:52:15 Speaker 45: to discuss capital projects, and then
02:52:16 Speaker 01: to the review. of the draft
02:52:18 Speaker 01: budget, November twenty sixth, in advance
02:52:20 Speaker 01: of committee of the whole meetings,
02:52:22 Speaker 01: December fifth and twelfth. Then we
02:52:24 Speaker 01: followed up with Deputy CAO, provided
02:52:26 Speaker 01: a report on twenty twenty sixth
02:52:29 Speaker 01: and twenty twenty seven staffing requests,
02:52:32 Speaker 01: and there were a number of
02:52:33 Speaker 01: requests put forward. They were discussed,
02:52:35 Speaker 01: and they are summarised in the
02:52:37 Speaker 01: motion. Happy to take any questions
02:52:38 Speaker 01: if you have any. Okay, thank
02:52:40 Speaker 01: you for that introduction. Then, and
02:52:43 Speaker 01: with that, we will put it
02:52:44 Speaker 01: out on the floor for questions
02:52:47 Speaker 01: and comments. This, of course, is
02:53:07 Speaker 01: just the preamble that will lead
02:53:08 Speaker 01: us up to our greater discussion
02:53:12 Speaker 46: days when we get to the
02:53:13 Speaker 46: actual draft budget. Not seeing any
02:53:14 Speaker 46: hands go up nor online, I
02:53:15 Speaker 46: think you've answered any questions that
02:53:16 Speaker 46: may be there with the material
02:53:19 Speaker 46: that was presented through the minutes.
02:53:23 Speaker 46: I'll call the question. Then, all
02:53:24 Speaker 46: those in favour, and that motion
02:53:26 Speaker 46: is carried. Thank you. I'll just
02:53:29 Speaker 46: look for the moment to the
02:53:32 Speaker 47: clerks. Okay, so I have received
02:53:33 Speaker 47: word that lunch has arrived. It
02:53:35 Speaker 47: is a hot lunch. We do
02:53:37 Speaker 47: have two more items to discuss.
02:53:39 Speaker 47: That includes the one item that's
02:53:41 Speaker 47: in closed session. So I'm looking.
02:53:43 Speaker 47: for consensus that we break for
02:53:45 Speaker 47: lunch at this point in time.
02:53:46 Speaker 47: Yes, I'm seeing that. Thank you.
02:53:50 Speaker 47: Okay, so we're going to break
02:53:52 Speaker 47: for lunch at this time. Then
02:53:54 Speaker 47: we will come back to item
02:53:55 Speaker 47: 7e and then go into closed
02:53:57 Speaker 47: session. And let's break until if
02:54:00 Speaker 47: we could come back at quarter
02:54:03 Speaker 47: two at 12:45, please. Thank you.
02:54:06 Speaker 47: very much. So we are back
02:54:09 Speaker 47: from our break, and we are
02:54:11 Speaker 47: moving on with item seven E.
7.e Joint Municipal Services Committee minutes dated September 26, 2025
The Joint Municipal Services Committee reviewed minutes from September 26, 2025, and endorsed resolutions regarding waste management, staffing, and healthcare recruitment. The committee proposes a regional waste management strategy to explore efficiency gains amidst shifting market dynamics, requesting $250,000 for consultant engagement in the 2026 budget. Additionally, the group aims to formalize existing informal HR collaboration to develop joint training programmes across municipalities. Regarding physician recruitment, the county intends to clarify its supportive role with local health organisations without disrupting current multi-stakeholder efforts. Council members discussed the urgent need for regional waste management planning to address impending landfill capacity shortages and rising costs across nine municipalities. Speakers emphasized that individual contracts are unsustainable as supply declines, urging the group to unite for a joint study rather than fighting separate battles. The discussion highlighted models where organics are converted to energy in Southgate, suggesting efficiency gains from county-wide contracts even if some waste leaves the local municipality. Councillors noted that a preferred landfill site identified in a 1998 study could prevent future conflicts over tipping fees and space allocation.
02:54:14 Speaker 47: It's recommended that the Joint Municipal
02:54:16 Speaker 47: Services Committee meeting minutes, dated September
02:54:18 Speaker 47: twenty six, twenty twenty five, be
02:54:20 Speaker 47: adopted as presented. and the following
02:54:22 Speaker 47: resolutions contain contain therein be endorsed.
02:54:23 Speaker 47: There are seven of them listed
02:54:25 Speaker 47: that have been published and circulated
02:54:27 Speaker 47: both in the minutes and on
02:54:30 Speaker 47: the agenda. So I will look
02:54:32 Speaker 47: for a mover and a seconder.
02:54:33 Speaker 47: Moved by Councillor Eccles, seconded by
02:54:35 Speaker 47: Councillor Pringle. So it's now on
02:54:37 Speaker 47: the floor for discussion. And welcome
02:54:39 Speaker 47: to the lectern this afternoon, Deputy
02:54:42 Speaker 47: Cao. Oh, I don't know whether
02:54:44 Speaker 47: speaking before lunch or after lunch
02:54:47 Speaker 47: is worse. There's a big green
02:54:48 Speaker 47: sticker that tells me which button
02:54:50 Speaker 47: to press, and apparently I didn't
02:54:51 Speaker 47: clue onto that. Was pressing the
02:54:52 Speaker 47: wrong one, but there we go.
02:54:54 Speaker 47: Good afternoon, and through you, through
02:54:57 Speaker 47: you, Warden. Thank you very much.
02:54:58 Speaker 47: I'm going to give a very
02:55:00 Speaker 47: quick update of the the last
02:55:02 Speaker 47: Joint Municipal Services Committee meeting. We
02:55:05 Speaker 47: met and discussed the priorities that
02:55:08 Speaker 47: had been ranked by the committee
02:55:11 Speaker 47: through its first meeting, and talked
02:55:14 Speaker 47: about next steps that we we've
02:55:16 Speaker 47: we've managed to sort of plot
02:55:18 Speaker 47: out for a course of action
02:55:19 Speaker 47: on those areas. So I'll go
02:55:21 Speaker 47: quickly through them. The first one
02:55:22 Speaker 47: was waste management, which is a
02:55:25 Speaker 47: a service which is delivered by
02:55:27 Speaker 47: member municipalities and has been. a
02:55:31 Speaker 47: subject of conversation around this horseshoe
02:55:32 Speaker 47: a number of times over the
02:55:34 Speaker 47: years. And through the Joint Municipal
02:55:36 Speaker 47: Services Committee, there was interest expressed
02:55:37 Speaker 47: in looking at considering closer ways
02:55:39 Speaker 47: of working across the county, with
02:55:42 Speaker 47: with the potential ultimately that that
02:55:43 Speaker 47: services could be partially or fully
02:55:45 Speaker 47: altered in their service delivery mechanism
02:55:47 Speaker 47: to potentially a county a county
02:55:50 Speaker 47: led a county led model. So
02:55:52 Speaker 47: there has been a very successful
02:55:55 Speaker 47: community of practice meeting. over the
02:55:56 Speaker 47: last two years, a year and
02:55:58 Speaker 47: a half, discussing the ways in
02:56:00 Speaker 47: which we deliver services, the similarities
02:56:01 Speaker 47: that exist between municipalities, and the
02:56:03 Speaker 47: differences that we currently have across
02:56:07 Speaker 47: the landscape of waste management and
02:56:10 Speaker 47: waste collection services in the county.
02:56:12 Speaker 47: So we have a fairly
02:56:14 Speaker 47: good understanding of what's what's happening
02:56:16 Speaker 47: out there. The next step in
02:56:19 Speaker 47: that process, we believe, and we're
02:56:22 Speaker 47: recommending, is to undertake a regional
02:56:24 Speaker 47: waste management strategy. It would look
02:56:26 Speaker 47: at all the services that are
02:56:28 Speaker 47: currently being provided and how they're
02:56:30 Speaker 47: being provided. It would look at
02:56:32 Speaker 47: the ways in which those services
02:56:35 Speaker 47: are being provided in other
02:56:38 Speaker 47: communities and different models that have
02:56:40 Speaker 47: been applied in those communities, and
02:56:42 Speaker 47: different ways in which those services
02:56:43 Speaker 47: could be delivered in the future,
02:56:44 Speaker 47: which may realise efficiencies, cost savings,
02:56:47 Speaker 47: and service level enhancements to community
02:56:49 Speaker 47: groups. And so, coming from
02:56:51 Speaker 47: that meeting, if endorsed by council
02:56:53 Speaker 47: to committee today and council in
02:56:54 Speaker 47: a couple of weeks' time. there
02:56:57 Speaker 47: would be a budget request. You
02:56:58 Speaker 47: would see in front of you
02:57:02 Speaker 47: as part of the 2026 budget
02:57:04 Speaker 47: to put 250,000 dollars to one
02:57:06 Speaker 47: side to engage a consultant to
02:57:09 Speaker 47: undertake that regional waste review. The
02:57:11 Speaker 47: second of the areas we spent
02:57:13 Speaker 47: some time talking about was staffing
02:57:14 Speaker 47: and HR services. We talked a
02:57:18 Speaker 47: lot as a committee about the
02:57:18 Speaker 47: similarities that exist between the member
02:57:20 Speaker 47: municipalities and the county across Grey,
02:57:22 Speaker 47: and some of the ways in
02:57:24 Speaker 47: which we we could look at
02:57:26 Speaker 47: ways of closer. alignment. Again, there
02:57:27 Speaker 47: is a an effective working group
02:57:29 Speaker 47: of HR managers and HR professionals
02:57:30 Speaker 47: that already collabourate informally across the
02:57:31 Speaker 47: county, and so really, what we're
02:57:32 Speaker 47: recommending at this point is formalising
02:57:35 Speaker 47: that process a little bit more
02:57:37 Speaker 47: and taking first steps towards looking
02:57:39 Speaker 47: at how we could deliver a
02:57:41 Speaker 47: joint training programme, more joined up
02:57:43 Speaker 47: delivery of training. Our staff in
02:57:45 Speaker 47: both Gray County and across member
02:57:47 Speaker 47: municipalities are undertaking very similar training.
02:57:50 Speaker 47: Taking very similar trainings in areas
02:57:51 Speaker 47: such as operations, in health and
02:57:53 Speaker 47: safety, in HR, and so there
02:57:55 Speaker 47: are some there are some
02:57:57 Speaker 47: easy wins in terms of aligning
02:57:59 Speaker 47: and closer alignment of those training
02:58:01 Speaker 47: courses. We also talked about some
02:58:03 Speaker 47: of the that would have been
02:58:04 Speaker 47: termed softer skills around finding efficiency,
02:58:06 Speaker 47: so lean type training, project management
02:58:07 Speaker 47: training, change management training, and how
02:58:09 Speaker 47: they could be delivered in a
02:58:11 Speaker 47: different way. And so we're going
02:58:13 Speaker 47: to take first. steps. We're advising
02:58:13 Speaker 47: that we take first steps towards
02:58:16 Speaker 47: a collective, collective approach to training,
02:58:19 Speaker 47: a more collective approach and collabourative
02:58:21 Speaker 47: approach to training in future years.
02:58:23 Speaker 47: It's fair to say that that
02:58:24 Speaker 47: conversation went a lot further than
02:58:26 Speaker 47: training. We explored all kinds of
02:58:28 Speaker 47: different areas where human resource services,
02:58:30 Speaker 47: training services, and other other areas
02:58:32 Speaker 47: around the staffing, retention, and recruitment
02:58:32 Speaker 47: side could be further, further merged
02:58:35 Speaker 47: or further shared between municipalities. But
02:58:37 Speaker 47: we felt that. this would be
02:58:39 Speaker 47: the first first good step coming
02:58:40 Speaker 47: out from that committee discussion. The
02:58:44 Speaker 47: last area, and I know this
02:58:45 Speaker 47: is an area close to close
02:58:46 Speaker 47: to many of your hearts, was
02:58:50 Speaker 47: around healthcare and physician recruitment, which
02:58:52 Speaker 47: was which was a topic that
02:58:53 Speaker 47: had been raised at the first
02:58:57 Speaker 47: one and given some degree of
02:59:00 Speaker 47: prioritisation. We've not been able to
02:59:02 Speaker 47: do a great deal in terms
02:59:04 Speaker 48: of what that would look like
02:59:09 Speaker 48: in respect of future actions between
02:59:12 Speaker 48: the first municipal service committee and
02:59:13 Speaker 48: the second one. What we have
02:59:16 Speaker 48: managed to do is meet with
02:59:18 Speaker 47: the OHT locally, Great Brook OHT,
02:59:19 Speaker 47: have a conversation with them in
02:59:21 Speaker 47: regards to their work and and
02:59:22 Speaker 47: what that looks like locally, and
02:59:25 Speaker 47: to start to build a build
02:59:26 Speaker 47: an understanding of whether the great
02:59:27 Speaker 47: whether Great County could add value
02:59:29 Speaker 47: in support of the conversations around
02:59:30 Speaker 47: healthcare and physician recruitment. We understand
02:59:32 Speaker 47: that that's a field where there's
02:59:34 Speaker 47: many many hands already involved, and
02:59:35 Speaker 47: so the first step we wanted
02:59:39 Speaker 47: to make sure of is that
02:59:42 Speaker 47: we wouldn't further muddy waters, and
02:59:46 Speaker 47: in fact could be a clarifying.
02:59:48 Speaker 47: That could be a clarifying influence
02:59:51 Speaker 47: rather than a muddying influence, and
02:59:54 Speaker 47: and by all partners, it would
02:59:55 Speaker 26: appear there is a role that
02:59:59 Speaker 26: the county could could play. And
03:00:01 Speaker 26: so, again, with the the support
03:00:04 Speaker 26: and endorsement of of council, our
03:00:06 Speaker 26: work would be to now sit
03:00:07 Speaker 26: down further with people that
03:00:10 Speaker 26: have been involved, both from a
03:00:12 Speaker 26: municipal perspective in the past as
03:00:15 Speaker 26: well as OHT, to try and
03:00:17 Speaker 26: clarify what the grey county role
03:00:23 Speaker 26: would be. So, as with the
03:00:26 Speaker 26: first meeting, it was a great
03:00:29 Speaker 26: great collabourative discussion. Identified a lot
03:00:30 Speaker 26: of opportunities that we can explore.
03:00:33 Speaker 26: and and so I'm happy to
03:00:34 Speaker 26: take any questions that might follow
03:00:39 Speaker 26: on from that. Thank you very
03:00:41 Speaker 26: much for that introduction. So we'll
03:00:44 Speaker 26: put it out for County Council
03:00:46 Speaker 26: for comments and questions. We'll start
03:00:50 Speaker 26: with the Deputy Warden. Thank you,
03:00:52 Speaker 26: Madam Warden, and thank you now
03:00:56 Speaker 26: for the report. Are the items
03:01:01 Speaker 26: on here in order of priority,
03:01:04 Speaker 26: or are they simply there as
03:01:06 Speaker 26: the course of the meeting, the
03:01:09 Speaker 47: conversation took place? Please. So, through
03:01:10 Speaker 47: you, Madam Warden. Good question. I
03:01:11 Speaker 47: can't remember. Would be the answer.
03:01:14 Speaker 47: So we did a we did
03:01:15 Speaker 47: a prioritization exercise in the first
03:01:17 Speaker 47: meeting. Where we really left that
03:01:19 Speaker 47: was just identifying the top three.
03:01:22 Speaker 47: So we had, I think, there
03:01:24 Speaker 47: were eleven items on that list,
03:01:26 Speaker 47: and I think we're going to
03:01:27 Speaker 47: work on all eleven over time.
03:01:29 Speaker 47: So the other the other eight
03:01:31 Speaker 47: or so, if my math is
03:01:34 Speaker 47: serving me correctly, have not been
03:01:36 Speaker 47: forgotten about. But there's no particular
03:01:37 Speaker 47: order into. But there's no particular
03:01:40 Speaker 47: order in terms of the way
03:01:41 Speaker 47: in which we we put them
03:01:42 Speaker 47: into the report. Okay. Other questions,
03:01:44 Speaker 47: comments? We'll go to Councillor Craig.
03:01:47 Speaker 47: Two questions. I guess the first
03:01:48 Speaker 47: one's a very quick question. I
03:01:49 Speaker 47: was surprised to see be directed
03:01:51 Speaker 47: to collate a library, but I
03:01:53 Speaker 47: surprised to see of HR policies
03:01:55 Speaker 47: after the library. I just wonder:
03:01:56 Speaker 47: is library something that the committee
03:01:57 Speaker 47: has? gotten that plan of eleven
03:01:59 Speaker 47: items have they went there in
03:02:01 Speaker 47: any of the discussion is there
03:02:02 Speaker 47: future discussion forthcoming on it and
03:02:05 Speaker 47: the second question is a little
03:02:06 Speaker 47: bit more information on the regional
03:02:08 Speaker 47: waste management plan like I've heard
03:02:10 Speaker 47: some discuss the idea of working
03:02:12 Speaker 47: together to secure like one vendor
03:02:13 Speaker 47: but you have to be careful
03:02:15 Speaker 47: for what you wish for. because
03:02:16 Speaker 47: right now there's a couple players
03:02:20 Speaker 47: in the marketplace, and that's a
03:02:21 Speaker 47: good thing. If you were to
03:02:23 Speaker 47: advance towards one particular vendor for
03:02:25 Speaker 47: your whole area in ten years,
03:02:27 Speaker 47: you might come to to regret
03:02:28 Speaker 47: that decision. So I'm just wondering
03:02:29 Speaker 47: at this point, what type of
03:02:31 Speaker 47: outcomes is the committee envisioning? So
03:02:33 Speaker 47: through you, Madam Warden. To the
03:02:36 Speaker 47: first question, library has been discussed
03:02:38 Speaker 47: in the past. Library as a
03:02:40 Speaker 47: great county service is not one
03:02:41 Speaker 47: of the ones that came up
03:02:42 Speaker 47: on this list. So, so the
03:02:45 Speaker 47: use of the word library in
03:02:46 Speaker 47: this particular instance was specific to
03:02:48 Speaker 47: the HR policy realm of things,
03:02:49 Speaker 47: rather than a more generic approach.
03:02:50 Speaker 47: In in regards to waste management,
03:02:53 Speaker 47: I think I think the the
03:02:55 Speaker 47: concept here is it's far too
03:02:57 Speaker 47: early to say what that. could
03:02:58 Speaker 47: look like. So the the nature
03:03:03 Speaker 47: of the landscape has shifted significantly.
03:03:10 Speaker 49: If if you roll back one
03:03:13 Speaker 49: or two contracts ago, there was
03:03:18 Speaker 31: a great deal more diversity in
03:03:21 Speaker 31: that marketplace than there is today.
03:03:22 Speaker 31: And you're quite correct. There are
03:03:25 Speaker 31: there are two local players, and
03:03:28 Speaker 31: one local player has achieved significantly
03:03:32 Speaker 31: more footprint over the last few
03:03:36 Speaker 31: years due to some provincial changes
03:03:43 Speaker 31: than than the other one. So
03:03:45 Speaker 31: so we're already seeing that market
03:03:50 Speaker 31: shift quite significantly. And so I
03:03:53 Speaker 31: think part of the work of
03:03:57 Speaker 31: the regional waste management strategy. is
03:04:00 Speaker 31: to look to see how that
03:04:05 Speaker 31: we could we could use that
03:04:08 Speaker 31: changing landscape to our advantage. Are
03:04:10 Speaker 31: there advantages that we could explore?
03:04:12 Speaker 31: And it could well be that
03:04:13 Speaker 31: at the end of that, it's
03:04:16 Speaker 31: it's status quo or it is
03:04:19 Speaker 31: rolling up of some services. So,
03:04:22 Speaker 31: for example, if you go next
03:04:23 Speaker 31: door to Bruce County, they've rolled
03:04:28 Speaker 31: up household hazardous waste collection to
03:04:31 Speaker 31: a county level, but they've left
03:04:34 Speaker 31: curbside collection to to member municipal
03:04:37 Speaker 31: levels. So there's there's no one
03:04:39 Speaker 31: size fits all. And I think
03:04:43 Speaker 31: the the idea behind undertaking this
03:04:44 Speaker 31: next step, in terms of looking
03:04:45 Speaker 31: at a strategy, is to see
03:04:48 Speaker 31: where there are some opportunities. And
03:04:49 Speaker 31: so, you know, another example of
03:04:51 Speaker 31: that is we have varying different
03:04:54 Speaker 47: capacities across Grey County in terms
03:04:56 Speaker 47: of landfill. We have varying different
03:04:57 Speaker 47: capacities in terms of how we
03:04:59 Speaker 47: deal with organic waste. And so,
03:05:01 Speaker 47: I know that our colleagues in
03:05:03 Speaker 47: Southgate are processing their own organic
03:05:04 Speaker 47: waste on site. In fact, doing
03:05:06 Speaker 47: so in a way with capacity
03:05:07 Speaker 47: that could be shared. And so,
03:05:09 Speaker 47: are there there are are there
03:05:11 Speaker 47: some efficiencies we can find within?
03:05:13 Speaker 47: that aren't going to necessarily cost
03:05:14 Speaker 47: any of us anymore, and so
03:05:15 Speaker 47: I think that would be the
03:05:16 Speaker 47: next step. Okay, we'll go to
03:05:19 Speaker 47: Councillor Dobrin. I'll reserve that comment.
03:05:21 Speaker 47: I was thinking of something, but
03:05:23 Speaker 47: I won't do that. How did
03:05:25 Speaker 47: you arrive at a consulting fee
03:05:26 Speaker 47: of two hundred and fifty thousand?
03:05:27 Speaker 47: dollars, quarter of a million dollars
03:05:30 Speaker 47: to evaluate the potential for a
03:05:31 Speaker 47: regional waste management system. My gut
03:05:32 Speaker 47: reaction is that it's somewhat wasteful.
03:05:35 Speaker 47: Thank you, pun intended, and yeah.
03:05:35 Speaker 47: So that aspect of it, and
03:05:37 Speaker 47: yes, Southgate has a very forward-thinking
03:05:39 Speaker 47: waste. Thinking waste diversion programme for
03:05:41 Speaker 47: some twenty-three years, and the organics
03:05:42 Speaker 47: does have capacity. We are non-unionized,
03:05:44 Speaker 47: and having come from a city
03:05:46 Speaker 47: where they convert the waste management
03:05:48 Speaker 47: system to you know private sector,
03:05:49 Speaker 47: and one side of the highway
03:05:52 Speaker 47: gets waste pickup, and the other
03:05:54 Speaker 47: one's on strike. So I would
03:05:56 Speaker 47: have I have concerns about it.
03:05:57 Speaker 47: If I recall. this was looked
03:05:58 Speaker 47: at not too long ago, like
03:06:01 Speaker 47: not too many years ago, maybe
03:06:02 Speaker 47: before 2020. Would we not look
03:06:03 Speaker 47: at that study first and see
03:06:04 Speaker 47: what the results were, or why
03:06:05 Speaker 47: we didn't? It wasn't pursued at
03:06:07 Speaker 47: that time. Thank you. So I
03:06:08 Speaker 47: might rely on the the CAO
03:06:10 Speaker 47: to help me out on this
03:06:12 Speaker 47: one, but to get started through
03:06:14 Speaker 47: you, Madam Warden. So the the
03:06:23 Speaker 47: work that was done in 2020
03:06:25 Speaker 47: was initiated by a request from
03:06:28 Speaker 47: member municipalities to have a look
03:06:31 Speaker 31: at this, and indeed we did
03:06:36 Speaker 31: take some steps towards that, but
03:06:38 Speaker 31: we never actually completed the study.
03:06:39 Speaker 31: There was there were some funding
03:06:40 Speaker 31: challenges, and there was certainly a
03:06:41 Speaker 47: pressure of time back in 2020
03:06:43 Speaker 47: on getting this one done to
03:06:44 Speaker 47: the requirements of the study, so
03:06:46 Speaker 47: it didn't actually happen. So so
03:06:50 Speaker 47: we aren't repeating work that has
03:06:52 Speaker 47: been done. We're really coming back
03:06:54 Speaker 47: to work that had already been
03:06:56 Speaker 47: requested to be done that we
03:06:57 Speaker 47: haven't yet. managed to get to,
03:07:00 Speaker 47: so so there's that piece. To
03:07:02 Speaker 47: the to the the value of
03:07:03 Speaker 47: this work, we've we've taken
03:07:04 Speaker 47: that value base from some of
03:07:11 Speaker 47: that initial work that was done
03:07:17 Speaker 47: in 2020 to scope out what
03:07:21 Speaker 47: this could look like, and and
03:07:22 Speaker 13: obviously built a little bit of
03:07:24 Speaker 13: a buffer in because we are
03:07:24 Speaker 13: now four or five years after
03:07:26 Speaker 13: that. We've also looked at some
03:07:28 Speaker 13: of the work that's been done
03:07:30 Speaker 13: in neighbouring counties. So Simcoe's done
03:07:33 Speaker 13: similar work, and Bruce County's done
03:07:35 Speaker 13: similar work, and these are the
03:07:39 Speaker 13: sorts of values that they've been
03:07:42 Speaker 13: getting back in terms of the
03:07:44 Speaker 13: consultation. In terms of the consulting
03:07:46 Speaker 13: costs associated for doing a
03:07:47 Speaker 13: body of work, which is which
03:07:51 Speaker 13: is essentially looking at ten organisations
03:07:53 Speaker 13: and how they organise waste and
03:07:57 Speaker 13: manage waste, looking at the provincial
03:08:00 Speaker 13: landscape for that, and then trying
03:08:01 Speaker 13: to map out what would happen.
03:08:03 Speaker 13: So it's a fairly significant body
03:08:04 Speaker 13: of work, as always. And I
03:08:06 Speaker 13: know I'm going to I'm stood
03:08:07 Speaker 13: up here, and my colleagues will
03:08:10 Speaker 13: say the same thing. My hope
03:08:14 Speaker 13: would be is that as an
03:08:19 Speaker 13: upper limit, and not a limit
03:08:21 Speaker 13: that we're aiming to get to,
03:08:23 Speaker 13: but based on those the look
03:08:25 Speaker 13: on the landscape, that's roughly what
03:08:27 Speaker 13: these pieces of work. So should
03:08:28 Speaker 13: this be approved with an upset
03:08:30 Speaker 13: limit of two hundred fifty thousand,
03:08:31 Speaker 13: the RFP would go out, and
03:08:33 Speaker 13: we would still have an opportunity
03:08:35 Speaker 13: to, yay or nay, the decision
03:08:36 Speaker 13: to award the consulting tender. So
03:08:37 Speaker 13: through you, Madam Ward, and absolutely.
03:08:40 Speaker 13: So we're not actually looking for
03:08:43 Speaker 13: approval right now to even get
03:08:45 Speaker 13: started on this work. That would.
03:08:46 Speaker 13: be something which will come through
03:08:48 Speaker 13: the budget process. So, if this
03:08:49 Speaker 13: is approved through the budget process,
03:08:51 Speaker 13: the the the hope would be
03:08:53 Speaker 13: to write collectively an RFP scope
03:08:54 Speaker 13: of works that would be done
03:08:56 Speaker 13: through that community of practice, through
03:08:58 Speaker 13: the CAO group, and through the
03:09:00 Speaker 13: joint municipal services group. That would
03:09:02 Speaker 13: then go out to market to
03:09:07 Speaker 13: be bid on, and it would
03:09:09 Speaker 31: come back through the traditional procurement
03:09:12 Speaker 31: channels for councils approval. Just further
03:09:14 Speaker 31: to Deputy CEO Lobbly's comments, as
03:09:18 Speaker 31: as Niall indicated, the you know
03:09:19 Speaker 31: the the step today would be
03:09:22 Speaker 31: to include this as part of
03:09:27 Speaker 31: the budget, so that be part
03:09:28 Speaker 31: of the budget considerations. We are
03:09:31 Speaker 31: proposing to fund that from both
03:09:33 Speaker 42: a waste manager reserve and a
03:09:35 Speaker 42: one time funding reserve combination, in
03:09:36 Speaker 42: order to fund that project. As
03:09:39 Speaker 42: Niall correctly indicated, just past COVID.
03:09:43 Speaker 42: there was a motion that was
03:09:44 Speaker 42: put forward by a municipality that
03:09:47 Speaker 42: to look into this. At that
03:09:48 Speaker 42: time, there was provincial funding through
03:09:51 Speaker 42: the municipal modernization funding. There was
03:09:53 Speaker 42: tight timelines, and we asked for
03:09:55 Speaker 42: an extension to that timeline. And
03:09:57 Speaker 42: unfortunately, that extension was not provided,
03:10:01 Speaker 42: and therefore, we felt that given
03:10:05 Speaker 42: the comprehensiveness of this study and
03:10:07 Speaker 42: the length of time it likely
03:10:10 Speaker 42: will take, we just couldn't meet
03:10:15 Speaker 42: that timeline at that time. So,
03:10:16 Speaker 42: therefore, that's why. that project didn't
03:10:19 Speaker 42: proceed. Then, we have since then
03:10:22 Speaker 42: have had several meetings with waste
03:10:27 Speaker 42: management staff from the various municipalities.
03:10:30 Speaker 42: We call it the waste management
03:10:34 Speaker 42: practice. We've collected some data and
03:10:36 Speaker 42: information as part of those discussions.
03:10:41 Speaker 42: So we think we're at a
03:10:42 Speaker 42: good starting point. We'll of course
03:10:44 Speaker 42: include that information as part of
03:10:46 Speaker 42: the RFP document. And like Nala
03:10:51 Speaker 42: said, we're hoping this is an
03:10:52 Speaker 42: upper limit. We hope we've been
03:10:55 Speaker 42: able to collect some of that
03:10:59 Speaker 42: information to maybe help cut some
03:11:02 Speaker 42: of those costs, so to speak,
03:11:05 Speaker 42: initially because that would have been
03:11:06 Speaker 42: required anyways as part of that
03:11:09 Speaker 42: initial first step for that study.
03:11:12 Speaker 13: But we've already done some of
03:11:13 Speaker 13: that base work to help inform
03:11:15 Speaker 13: the study. So, so I think
03:11:17 Speaker 13: we're at a good starting point
03:11:20 Speaker 13: with it, and hopefully we'll get
03:11:21 Speaker 13: some costs. That 250 was what
03:11:23 Speaker 13: we proposed. What was the estimate
03:11:26 Speaker 13: back in 2021? We were
03:11:28 Speaker 13: considering this study back then. and
03:11:31 Speaker 13: you just reminded me of one
03:11:33 Speaker 13: more thing: is that with producer
03:11:35 Speaker 13: responsibility, the recycling component of that
03:11:38 Speaker 13: landscape may have changed for all
03:11:42 Speaker 13: of our municipalities, which kind of
03:11:44 Speaker 13: throws a wrinkle into the information
03:11:46 Speaker 13: that might have been collected five
03:11:47 Speaker 13: years ago. Okay, thank you. We're
03:11:49 Speaker 13: going to go to Councillor Eccles
03:11:50 Speaker 13: next. Two hundred and fifty thousand
03:11:52 Speaker 13: dollars. is that going to be
03:11:53 Speaker 13: the finding fee to find that
03:11:56 Speaker 13: study that was done in nineteen
03:11:57 Speaker 13: ninety four on waste management at
03:11:59 Speaker 13: a county level? How much? I
03:12:03 Speaker 13: mean, we've been down this path
03:12:05 Speaker 13: before, and I'm not going to
03:12:08 Speaker 13: dwell on it. But we've got
03:12:11 Speaker 13: studies upon studies on how the
03:12:14 Speaker 13: county can get into waste management,
03:12:17 Speaker 13: and now we're going to do
03:12:20 Speaker 13: another one or proposed. I mean,
03:12:22 Speaker 13: just this isn't. towards you, Deputy
03:12:25 Speaker 13: CEO. This is this is this
03:12:29 Speaker 13: committee letting us come forward. I'd
03:12:31 Speaker 13: have a hard time, a very
03:12:32 Speaker 13: hard time supporting us in budget.
03:12:33 Speaker 13: I'll just put that up front.
03:12:36 Speaker 13: That's all. And for anybody's 1994,
03:12:38 Speaker 13: there was a study done by
03:12:39 Speaker 13: the county on all how the
03:12:40 Speaker 13: county could. do waste management. I
03:12:42 Speaker 13: have seen it. It's sitting someplace
03:12:44 Speaker 13: in the vault, Randy. Was it
03:12:49 Speaker 13: a million? I thought it was
03:12:51 Speaker 13: a million two, but yeah, it
03:12:52 Speaker 49: was well over a million dollars
03:12:58 Speaker 49: that that study cost at that
03:13:05 Speaker 49: time. And it was fully funded
03:13:07 Speaker 20: by the province. So, anyways, just
03:13:09 Speaker 20: saying, it's there is one out
03:13:11 Speaker 20: there. The the CAO would like
03:13:14 Speaker 20: to respond. Thank you, through you,
03:13:16 Speaker 20: Warden, Councillor Ackles is correct. There
03:13:17 Speaker 20: was a study that was done
03:13:21 Speaker 20: in early nineties, for sure. And
03:13:25 Speaker 20: in terms of looking at waste
03:13:27 Speaker 20: management, I think at that time
03:13:30 Speaker 20: it was scoped in terms of
03:13:32 Speaker 20: looking at potential expansion of an
03:13:34 Speaker 20: existing landfill at that time, and
03:13:36 Speaker 20: whether or not that could serve
03:13:38 Speaker 20: a wider area in terms of
03:13:40 Speaker 20: landfill capacity, as Nile indicated. the
03:13:41 Speaker 20: landscape has significantly changed on the
03:13:45 Speaker 20: wayside. As Councillor Debrine just indicated,
03:13:46 Speaker 20: the recycling aspects have significant changing
03:13:48 Speaker 20: or continuing to change, even month
03:13:50 Speaker 20: to month it seems. So, so
03:13:54 Speaker 20: we think that although there was
03:13:56 Speaker 20: a previous study that was completed,
03:13:58 Speaker 20: and again some of that will
03:14:00 Speaker 20: help inform some background information that
03:14:03 Speaker 20: we can provide to the consultant
03:14:05 Speaker 20: to hopefully keep the cost down
03:14:06 Speaker 20: as low as we can. But
03:14:09 Speaker 20: we think there's merit to exploring
03:14:11 Speaker 20: this. based on some of the
03:14:17 Speaker 20: conversations again that we've had collectively
03:14:19 Speaker 20: through that community practice, and and
03:14:21 Speaker 20: to at least see if there's
03:14:27 Speaker 20: opportunities and whether or not it's
03:14:32 Speaker 20: across a wide spectrum of just
03:14:34 Speaker 20: working together on promotional materials and
03:14:36 Speaker 50: helping to to educate and and
03:14:37 Speaker 50: and be aware of all the
03:14:39 Speaker 50: changing changes that are occurring and
03:14:41 Speaker 50: sharing some of those those communications
03:14:44 Speaker 50: and services. rate through rate to
03:14:45 Speaker 50: potentially the county, then assuming waste
03:14:48 Speaker 50: management and lots of stuff in
03:14:51 Speaker 50: between there. So we think there's
03:14:53 Speaker 50: a number of options that can
03:14:59 Speaker 50: be explored. Obviously, doing that cost
03:15:04 Speaker 50: benefit analysis to see what makes
03:15:07 Speaker 50: the most sense or what might
03:15:09 Speaker 50: make the most sense, and then
03:15:12 Speaker 22: of course bringing that back to
03:15:15 Speaker 22: council and the respective member municipal
03:15:16 Speaker 22: councils for consideration. Okay, thank you.
03:15:17 Speaker 22: I'll look around the room. We'll
03:15:19 Speaker 22: go to Councillor Kent. We'll go
03:15:21 Speaker 22: to Councillor Kentner next. Right. Thank
03:15:25 Speaker 22: you, and through you, Gordon Matrasovs.
03:15:28 Speaker 22: I think that all of our,
03:15:29 Speaker 22: all of us in the first
03:15:34 Speaker 22: tiers, are going through a process
03:15:38 Speaker 22: right now where we are trying
03:15:42 Speaker 22: to get to our first budget
03:15:43 Speaker 22: meeting without having to start at
03:15:47 Speaker 22: six or seven percent because of
03:15:49 Speaker 22: pre-approval. Because of preapprovals, and to
03:15:51 Speaker 22: me, this the waste management problem
03:15:52 Speaker 22: sounds a lot like the housing
03:15:54 Speaker 22: problem. Is there a jurisdiction anywhere
03:15:56 Speaker 22: that has solved it, on either
03:15:59 Speaker 22: side of the border, for that
03:16:03 Speaker 22: matter? Like, I think we should
03:16:04 Speaker 22: really think hard about this
03:16:08 Speaker 22: quarter million because every four times
03:16:09 Speaker 22: you spend it, you're down a
03:16:11 Speaker 22: million. I just, I just, I
03:16:12 Speaker 22: know where those of us who
03:16:14 Speaker 22: are speaking this way are treading
03:16:16 Speaker 22: where angels fear. to, but honestly,
03:16:17 Speaker 22: I think we have we can
03:16:19 Speaker 22: gather on our own all the
03:16:22 Speaker 22: information we need to know how
03:16:24 Speaker 22: we can deal with with it
03:16:27 Speaker 22: more effectively in Gray County, and
03:16:28 Speaker 22: then we can talk to Bruce
03:16:30 Speaker 22: County and Simcoe County and Dufferin
03:16:31 Speaker 22: County and Wellington County. Is there
03:16:32 Speaker 22: a firm out there that we
03:16:33 Speaker 22: know actually specializes in presenting a
03:16:34 Speaker 22: plan that will? be so much
03:16:36 Speaker 22: more effective than what we're doing
03:16:37 Speaker 22: now. Those are my points. Thanks.
03:16:40 Speaker 22: Okay. Thank you. Do Do you
03:16:41 Speaker 22: want? Okay. Just to the latter
03:16:43 Speaker 22: question, in terms of whether or
03:16:45 Speaker 22: not there's there's firms that specialize
03:16:46 Speaker 22: in this area, yes, there's several
03:16:49 Speaker 22: firms that that we're aware of
03:16:51 Speaker 22: that have, again, other neighbouring counties
03:16:54 Speaker 22: have have utilised in the past
03:16:55 Speaker 22: to do a similar study. so
03:16:56 Speaker 22: we know that there's there's there's
03:16:58 Speaker 22: firms out there that specialize in
03:17:00 Speaker 22: this area, and yeah, and so
03:17:01 Speaker 22: just leave it there. Okay, we'll
03:17:03 Speaker 22: go to Councillor Body. Just to
03:17:05 Speaker 22: respond to some of the concerns,
03:17:07 Speaker 22: changes are coming pretty quickly in
03:17:08 Speaker 22: this in this area. I know
03:17:13 Speaker 22: Meaford got a contract recently. for
03:17:17 Speaker 22: garbage removal a couple of years
03:17:18 Speaker 22: ago, but they got whacked, and
03:17:19 Speaker 22: at that point they're saying we
03:17:23 Speaker 22: need help. We need to think
03:17:24 Speaker 07: think bigger. Blue Box has changed
03:17:27 Speaker 07: since 1994. I don't know. There's
03:17:29 Speaker 07: probably people around the table that
03:17:30 Speaker 07: weren't born then. Oh, sorry, sorry,
03:17:31 Speaker 07: Dana, I was talking about you,
03:17:32 Speaker 07: but there's something like only 10
03:17:33 Speaker 07: years left, and a lot of
03:17:35 Speaker 07: landfills. Left in a lot of
03:17:38 Speaker 07: landfill sites in Ontario. When that
03:17:41 Speaker 07: demand changes, you know the demand
03:17:42 Speaker 07: stays the same. The supply comes
03:17:46 Speaker 07: down. Economics: the cost is going
03:17:47 Speaker 07: up, and we need to start
03:17:49 Speaker 07: looking ahead ten years from now,
03:17:51 Speaker 07: not looking at the next election,
03:17:53 Speaker 07: frankly, and moving ahead and figuring
03:17:55 Speaker 07: out how we can do this.
03:17:58 Speaker 07: At some point, there's potentially nine
03:18:01 Speaker 07: municipalities are going to be looking
03:18:03 Speaker 07: at spending two hundred and fifty
03:18:05 Speaker 07: thousand dollars on a consult. A
03:18:06 Speaker 07: thousand dollars on a consultant's report.
03:18:08 Speaker 07: If we don't get crack together
03:18:10 Speaker 07: and try and do it as
03:18:11 Speaker 07: one, and move the ball forward
03:18:14 Speaker 07: in behalf of all of us,
03:18:16 Speaker 07: and and start looking at it
03:18:17 Speaker 07: now. The last report I think
03:18:22 Speaker 07: you said was two thousand or
03:18:26 Speaker 07: twenty twenty. That the last time
03:18:28 Speaker 07: we looked at it, we didn't
03:18:30 Speaker 07: get the funding to do the
03:18:32 Speaker 07: report. And I know Al Barfet
03:18:33 Speaker 07: was around at the time because
03:18:35 Speaker 07: I can picture him out at
03:18:37 Speaker 07: where we were at the time
03:18:39 Speaker 07: having the discussion. That's five years
03:18:40 Speaker 07: that have gone by already. So
03:18:42 Speaker 07: double that by two. and all
03:18:44 Speaker 07: of a sudden we're in trouble.
03:18:45 Speaker 07: So we need to start thinking
03:18:47 Speaker 07: ahead, and that was the whole
03:18:50 Speaker 07: thought in the discussion at the
03:18:52 Speaker 07: committee. Is each of us has
03:18:54 Speaker 07: individual contracts, each of us has
03:18:56 Speaker 07: different landfill abilities, but at some
03:18:57 Speaker 07: point we're all going to get
03:19:02 Speaker 07: whacked. So we'd be better to
03:19:04 Speaker 07: put our heads together, move the
03:19:07 Speaker 07: ball forward, and be ready when
03:19:12 Speaker 07: when we do get whacked. So
03:19:14 Speaker 30: that was the thinking, and why
03:19:19 Speaker 30: we're looking at trying to plan
03:19:22 Speaker 30: ahead and spend a little bit
03:19:23 Speaker 51: of money now. Thanks. Okay, we'll
03:19:26 Speaker 51: go over to Councillor McQueen. Thank
03:19:28 Speaker 51: you, Madam Warden, and good discussion.
03:19:30 Speaker 51: And I know over the years
03:19:31 Speaker 51: we did have discussion about a
03:19:33 Speaker 51: regional approach. I know with us
03:19:34 Speaker 51: with Grey Highlands, we went into
03:19:36 Speaker 51: a contract with the first time
03:19:38 Speaker 51: with the bins, and I know
03:19:39 Speaker 51: our colleagues from the South have
03:19:41 Speaker 51: been doing it for a lot
03:19:43 Speaker 51: of years, and that we tried
03:19:44 Speaker 51: it, and it seems like people
03:19:46 Speaker 51: like them. From saying that. that
03:19:48 Speaker 51: contract, when that garbage is picked
03:19:49 Speaker 51: up from our roadside, it doesn't
03:19:50 Speaker 51: go into our landfill. It leaves
03:19:52 Speaker 51: our municipality and goes somewhere else.
03:19:53 Speaker 51: I mean, we do have a
03:19:55 Speaker 51: landfill that people bring tipping fees
03:19:56 Speaker 51: and or to you know like
03:19:57 Speaker 51: land like whatever they have for
03:19:59 Speaker 51: trailers and stuff like that. But
03:20:06 Speaker 51: under that contract, now we don't
03:20:06 Speaker 52: have organics, but it it leaves
03:20:08 Speaker 26: just from that contract, and
03:20:11 Speaker 26: we just moved a motion to
03:20:12 Speaker 26: extend. that for two more years.
03:20:14 Speaker 26: It was originally three, and to
03:20:16 Speaker 26: look at for two ext an
03:20:19 Speaker 26: extension of two more years. So
03:20:21 Speaker 26: there is models out there that
03:20:23 Speaker 26: for whatever, however, but I will
03:20:25 Speaker 26: say that just in the sense
03:20:26 Speaker 26: of today's today's dynamics around garbage
03:20:30 Speaker 26: and organics. I think myself, Councillor
03:20:32 Speaker 26: Milone, Councillor Eccles, we attended a
03:20:34 Speaker 26: session or a fella a year
03:20:36 Speaker 26: ago last January at Roma. That
03:20:39 Speaker 26: I think it's actually in Southgate
03:20:43 Speaker 26: that they're taking. organics and making
03:20:47 Speaker 26: energy, so the dynamics have changed
03:20:51 Speaker 26: because there is money in the
03:20:53 Speaker 26: in those organics now because they
03:20:54 Speaker 26: are converting that organics into energy
03:20:58 Speaker 26: and gas or clean gas or
03:21:02 Speaker 26: whatever. So there there is a
03:21:03 Speaker 26: lot of dynamics that are changing,
03:21:07 Speaker 26: and you know, efficiency is is
03:21:09 Speaker 26: good is good. It just I
03:21:12 Speaker 26: know when we went to that
03:21:14 Speaker 26: contract, it we we still have
03:21:15 Speaker 26: to pay, it's still there on
03:21:19 Speaker 26: that sense of cost, but material
03:21:24 Speaker 26: does leave. If if the if
03:21:27 Speaker 26: if the part is around not
03:21:28 Speaker 26: having landfill space, so I just
03:21:30 Speaker 26: shared that. Okay, thank you. Any
03:21:33 Speaker 26: other discussion? Yes, Councillor Finger. Thanks,
03:21:38 Speaker 26: Warden. Yeah, I just offering my
03:21:46 Speaker 26: support to Councillor Body over there.
03:21:49 Speaker 26: This is really a process. I
03:21:51 Speaker 26: think we wanted to get going,
03:21:53 Speaker 26: as opposed to having nine single
03:21:55 Speaker 07: voices trying to fight your own
03:21:56 Speaker 07: battle that we. can unite and
03:21:58 Speaker 07: be one voice as a group
03:22:00 Speaker 07: and do better things to make
03:22:02 Speaker 07: efficiencies in the in the world
03:22:05 Speaker 07: of waste management. We all know
03:22:07 Speaker 07: that things have changed a lot
03:22:10 Speaker 07: in 30 years, so and are
03:22:12 Speaker 07: still changing and evolving every day.
03:22:13 Speaker 07: But it was really around us
03:22:16 Speaker 07: trying to find efficiencies amongst the
03:22:17 Speaker 07: nine of us to be able
03:22:20 Speaker 07: to move us forward. You're right;
03:22:23 Speaker 07: it's quarter of a million dollars
03:22:25 Speaker 07: as they ask. Hopefully, we don't
03:22:29 Speaker 07: get that far on it on
03:22:31 Speaker 07: the price side of things, but
03:22:34 Speaker 07: we don't know what we don't
03:22:35 Speaker 07: know right now. So we need
03:22:40 Speaker 07: to ask the question. Okay, thank
03:22:42 Speaker 07: you, Councillor Greg. Yeah, I was
03:22:45 Speaker 07: just going to say one of
03:22:47 Speaker 07: the most controversial discussions, probably any
03:22:48 Speaker 07: municipalities could have in the province,
03:22:50 Speaker 07: would be on waste management. And
03:22:52 Speaker 07: when you get talking about right
03:22:53 Speaker 07: across boundaries from each other, so
03:22:55 Speaker 07: this more than a lot of
03:22:56 Speaker 07: studies, it does have a value
03:22:58 Speaker 07: add in terms of if it
03:23:00 Speaker 07: is demonstrated. And I'm looking at
03:23:02 Speaker 07: it right now. It was 1998.
03:23:07 Speaker 07: Was the landfill study because there's
03:23:09 Speaker 07: a preferred landfill site that's on
03:23:10 Speaker 07: page five of 533 pages right
03:23:11 Speaker 07: there in front of me. It
03:23:14 Speaker 07: gives you as a council that
03:23:16 Speaker 07: document that can prevent you from
03:23:19 Speaker 07: literally going at each other across
03:23:21 Speaker 07: the table on on a discussion
03:23:22 Speaker 07: that is can be and is
03:23:24 Speaker 07: demonstrated to be so controversial and
03:23:26 Speaker 07: as. member body indicated, waste management
03:23:27 Speaker 07: in the province is only going
03:23:30 Speaker 07: to get more strenuous, and it's
03:23:32 Speaker 07: occurring extremely quickly with population growth,
03:23:33 Speaker 07: even even shortening that window. So
03:23:36 Speaker 07: we are going to get there,
03:23:38 Speaker 07: but I think at least the
03:23:40 Speaker 07: value in the document is it
03:23:42 Speaker 07: does provide probably a better environment
03:23:43 Speaker 07: for proper discussion. and again, this
03:23:44 Speaker 07: time is only an ask to
03:23:46 Speaker 07: go into the budget. But if
03:23:47 Speaker 07: it does advance, it takes away
03:23:53 Speaker 07: some of the the personal feelings
03:23:54 Speaker 07: in such a controversial discussion. So,
03:23:57 Speaker 07: thanks. Okay, thank you. We'll go
03:23:59 Speaker 07: back. Just no first hands. I'll
03:24:02 Speaker 10: go back to Councillor McQueen. Well,
03:24:04 Speaker 10: thank you, Madam Warden, and. certainly,
03:24:06 Speaker 10: do we have to spend two
03:24:07 Speaker 10: hundred fifty thousand to have that
03:24:08 Speaker 10: discussion, or should we have a
03:24:10 Speaker 10: a discussion on the report that
03:24:11 Speaker 10: that Councillor Eklund just talked about?
03:24:13 Speaker 10: In because thinking, and I know
03:24:14 Speaker 10: in the past some municipalities had
03:24:16 Speaker 10: landfill space and others didn't, and
03:24:19 Speaker 10: I remember the discussion; some didn't
03:24:21 Speaker 10: want to give up that space
03:24:22 Speaker 10: for others. But if the new
03:24:23 Speaker 10: mall is, say, for example, like
03:24:26 Speaker 10: our contract, we have a a
03:24:29 Speaker 10: county-wide contract. pick up all the
03:24:31 Speaker 10: garbage it leaves. Maybe still have
03:24:32 Speaker 10: your your your own waste station
03:24:34 Speaker 10: for your for what comes in,
03:24:35 Speaker 10: but the garbage itself is from
03:24:36 Speaker 10: a contract across across the county.
03:24:37 Speaker 10: I mean, like like to do
03:24:39 Speaker 10: that, like what would be involved
03:24:41 Speaker 10: with looking at that? I just
03:24:42 Speaker 10: know from it was a little
03:24:43 Speaker 10: bit tough for us to get
03:24:45 Speaker 10: follow through on what we ended
03:24:47 Speaker 10: up going down with. the bins,
03:24:50 Speaker 10: you know, people saying pulling and
03:24:51 Speaker 10: stuff like that. I know Southgate
03:24:53 Speaker 10: has been doing it. There was
03:24:54 Speaker 10: some education from Southgate to our
03:24:55 Speaker 10: staff and stuff, but it's gone
03:24:58 Speaker 10: through that process and it seems
03:25:00 Speaker 10: to work. But it leaves. So
03:25:01 Speaker 10: is that an easy possibility? I
03:25:02 Speaker 10: know. Yeah, I know. I don't
03:25:03 Speaker 10: know what all the contracts coming
03:25:05 Speaker 10: due with all the municipalities, but
03:25:06 Speaker 10: if you have a larger company
03:25:08 Speaker 10: that's dealing with garbage, all we're
03:25:11 Speaker 10: looking at. is providing the service.
03:25:13 Speaker 10: I guess it's for the cost
03:25:14 Speaker 10: and what that cost is. But
03:25:18 Speaker 10: if those that don't have landfill
03:25:22 Speaker 10: space, obviously that's a bigger issue.
03:25:23 Speaker 10: Then, but even for ourselves, the
03:25:26 Speaker 10: roadside garbage is not going into our landfill, which is sort of unique. Which I think maybe helps eliminate some of that issue that was the issues of the past. Was we got space, you don't have space. Sorry, we don't want you to use our space because that's our space. I think that was part of the issue a few years back. The same. Okay, thank you very much. And of course, we are just voting on on bringing it forth for discussion in the 2026 budget. So so this this dialogueue is very healthy. I think that gives staff a little heads up about the kinds of questions that are going to be coming forward. And and in addition to that, would be the lens of what's changed. I know from the Town of Blue Mountains, we've extended the life of our landfill. because we do drywall diversion and drywall recycling made a huge difference. So that again would be a different picture than what was happening 30 years ago. I also hear from from the varied experiences of of the historic dialogueues on this that I'm sure all of us are going to be keen to get a hold of that 1994 report and be able to be on the same page when we come back to this and have a discussion. If somebody's referring to something to be able to get the full picture, and I think that will be a healthy continuation. of this dialogueue at that point in time. Okay, so with that, then I don't see any further hands up, and it was for all of the seven items that were contained in that report. So I'll call the question. All those in favour, and that motion is carried. Thank you. So we'll need a moment to switch over to go into closed meeting, but I'll need the motion to go into closed. It's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to Section Two Thirty Nine Two of the Municipal Act Two Thousand and One. Act 2001 as amended to discuss labour relations or employee negotiations regarding social services. Opsu Local 266 may ask for a motion. Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded by Councillor McKay. All those in favour.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.