Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — October 9, 2025

Hook: Feversham Paramedic Base Contract Delays

Grey County · Committee of the Whole · October 9, 2025

Summary

The Committee of the Whole met on October 9, 2025, to review administrative reports, minute adoptions, and a tender proposal facing budget constraints. While several minutes were adopted, a recommendation regarding the Feversham Paramedic Base contract was held pending due to funding overage concerns and sole-sourcing questions.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
Committee of the Whole
Date
October 9, 2025
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

Council member Paul McQueen called the committee meeting to order on October 9, 2025.

00:48:32 Speaker 01: switch over. Thank you. I'd like

00:48:35 Speaker 01: to call to order this committee.

00:48:36 Speaker 01: The whole. meeting of October 9th,

00:48:38 Speaker 01: 2025. At this point in time,

00:48:39 Speaker 01: I'll put out a call if

2 Declaration of Interest

Council considered a notice of motion requesting provincial support to oppose legislation prohibiting automated speed enforcement cameras. Speakers argued that municipalities must retain the authority under the Municipal Act to decide on safety measures like traffic cameras based on local resident concerns. The discussion highlighted that revenue from these cameras is often reinvested into community safety zones rather than burdening taxpayers. Councillors expressed frustration with the provincial government's attempt to override municipal jurisdiction and prevent culture change regarding speeding. One speaker noted that current enforcement thresholds are not always disclosed to the public, raising democratic concerns about transparency. The motion serves as a tribute to a former community member who advocated for taxpayer protection and safety initiatives.

00:48:41 Speaker 01: there are any declarations of interest

00:48:42 Speaker 01: on this agenda. Seeing no hands

00:48:43 Speaker 26: raised, we'll move on. We have

00:48:47 Speaker 26: business arising from the minutes. We

00:48:50 Speaker 26: have one notice of motion from

00:48:52 Speaker 26: Councillor Gregg. So in a moment,

00:48:54 Speaker 26: Councillor Gregg, I will ask you

00:48:56 Speaker 26: to read out your notice of

00:48:58 Speaker 26: motion without any explanation or intro.

00:49:01 Speaker 26: I'll look for a seconder for

00:49:03 Speaker 26: you, and if we have a

00:49:07 Speaker 26: seconder and it's on the floor

00:49:09 Speaker 26: for discussion, I will return to

00:49:12 Speaker 26: you directly. So, would you like

00:49:13 Speaker 26: to? Could you read? Sorry, the

00:49:16 Speaker 26: way we usually do it back

00:49:19 Speaker 26: home is the person who's serving

00:49:21 Speaker 26: the notice of motion reads it

00:49:24 Speaker 26: out, and then we look for

00:49:27 Speaker 26: a seconder before there's any discussion.

00:49:29 Speaker 26: So, over to you. The mic

00:49:32 Speaker 26: is yours. Thank you, Gordon Matyszak,

00:49:35 Speaker 26: and I'd like to introduce the

00:49:37 Speaker 26: notice of motion. Whereas Part Two

00:49:39 Speaker 26: of the Municipal Act generally confers

00:49:43 Speaker 01: broad authority on the municipality to

00:49:47 Speaker 01: enable the municipality. to govern its

00:49:50 Speaker 01: affairs as it considers appropriate, and

00:49:52 Speaker 01: to enhance the municipality's ability to

00:49:54 Speaker 01: respond to municipal issues, and whereas

00:49:56 Speaker 01: community safety is of foremost concern

00:49:57 Speaker 01: to residents, and whereas automated speed

00:49:59 Speaker 01: traffic cameras assist in responding to

00:50:01 Speaker 01: resident concerns, now therefore be it

00:50:03 Speaker 01: resolved that this council asks MPP

00:50:08 Speaker 27: Vickers and MPP Saunderson to support

00:50:10 Speaker 27: this position in opposing any provincial

00:50:12 Speaker 27: legislation introduced to. prohibit the use

00:50:14 Speaker 27: of automated speed enforcement, and that

00:50:18 Speaker 27: this resolution be circulated to each

00:50:21 Speaker 27: municipality within Grey County, requesting their

00:50:24 Speaker 27: endorsement, and that the resolution be

00:50:25 Speaker 27: sent to Premier Ford, Minister of

00:50:27 Speaker 27: Transportation Pravmeet Sakharia, MPP Vickers, and

00:50:32 Speaker 27: MPP Saunderson. Thank you very much.

00:50:34 Speaker 27: And I okay. Well, sorry. Directionally,

00:50:37 Speaker 27: I saw Councillor Dobrine will second

00:50:38 Speaker 27: that motion, but I. In that

00:50:40 Speaker 27: motion, but I did acknowledge the

00:50:41 Speaker 27: other hands that have been raised.

00:50:44 Speaker 27: It's now on the floor for

00:50:46 Speaker 27: discussion. So I will look to

00:50:48 Speaker 27: Councillor Greg to introduce your notice.

00:50:50 Speaker 27: Any further details you'd like to

00:50:53 Speaker 27: provide? Thank you. And I'd like

00:50:57 Speaker 27: to just provide this notice also

00:50:59 Speaker 27: as a tribute to a member

00:51:01 Speaker 27: of our community in Owen Sound

00:51:05 Speaker 27: who campaigned for years, canvassing for

00:51:08 Speaker 27: candidates who were strong supporters of

00:51:10 Speaker 27: looking after. the taxpayer—that's something that

00:51:13 Speaker 27: Bill King, who was a member

00:51:15 Speaker 27: for many years on our operations

00:51:17 Speaker 27: committee in Oceansound, advocated for and

00:51:19 Speaker 27: supported initiatives that looked after the

00:51:22 Speaker 27: taxpayer. And we lost Bill probably

00:51:24 Speaker 27: a little more than a year

00:51:26 Speaker 27: ago. But this is somewhat of

00:51:28 Speaker 27: a tribute to to Bill because

00:51:30 Speaker 27: he was a strong advocate for

00:51:32 Speaker 27: community safety, and automated speed enforcement

00:51:33 Speaker 27: and cameras were part of that

00:51:37 Speaker 27: in Bill's in Bill's mind. So

00:51:39 Speaker 27: I am. quite bothered by what

00:51:43 Speaker 27: the premier is has initiated here.

00:51:45 Speaker 27: It is demonstrated when he announced

00:51:47 Speaker 27: this legislation. He had the mayor

00:51:48 Speaker 27: of Vaughan standing beside him. Vaughan

00:51:49 Speaker 27: removed traffic cameras in their communities,

00:51:52 Speaker 27: and that is fine. That's democracy

00:51:54 Speaker 27: as it should be, and I

00:51:56 Speaker 27: applaud him for that. But I

00:51:57 Speaker 27: think what is most important is

00:52:02 Speaker 27: that the municipalities have the opportunity.

00:52:08 Speaker 27: to decide whether or not those

00:52:11 Speaker 27: traffic cameras are something that are

00:52:15 Speaker 27: a benefit in their community that

00:52:17 Speaker 27: respond to residents' concerns. And if

00:52:19 Speaker 27: you do not feel that way

00:52:22 Speaker 27: and you have them in already

00:52:24 Speaker 27: installed, you can walk back that

00:52:26 Speaker 27: decision municipally. It's a municipal decision.

00:52:28 Speaker 27: And he aligned himself the day

00:52:31 Speaker 27: he announced the legislation with other

00:52:32 Speaker 27: mayors who demonstrated that it is

00:52:35 Speaker 27: a municipal decision, and it's a

00:52:36 Speaker 27: municipal decision as provided. It's a

00:52:39 Speaker 27: municipal decision. It's provided in the

00:52:42 Speaker 27: Municipal Act. If you want to

00:52:44 Speaker 27: take away the ability for municipalities

00:52:47 Speaker 27: to look after resident concerns, change

00:52:49 Speaker 27: the Municipal Act. I challenge you

00:52:54 Speaker 27: to do that because that invites

00:52:56 Speaker 27: a whole lot more public input

00:52:58 Speaker 27: and a lot more time. It's

00:53:01 Speaker 27: announced that the assault on the

00:53:03 Speaker 27: taxpayer is over, and I ask

00:53:04 Speaker 27: myself, really, who do you think

00:53:07 Speaker 27: funds the provincial government and all

00:53:08 Speaker 27: the infrastructure that you're now asking

00:53:11 Speaker 27: to be created out of a

00:53:13 Speaker 27: new fund? What I'd like to

00:53:15 Speaker 27: do is invite the premier to

00:53:17 Speaker 27: come to Owen Sound to visit

00:53:19 Speaker 27: with me and one of our

00:53:20 Speaker 27: fine men and women who drive

00:53:23 Speaker 27: a snowplow and a fire truck,

00:53:26 Speaker 27: and we will crush a box

00:53:28 Speaker 27: of Chapman's ice cream bars as

00:53:30 Speaker 27: we walk around the city, and

00:53:34 Speaker 27: we will inform the premier. and

00:53:36 Speaker 27: the premier's staff of what kind

00:53:38 Speaker 27: of obstacles that speed bumps and

00:53:41 Speaker 27: enhanced crosswalks provide in terms of

00:53:44 Speaker 27: the machinery and the mechanics in

00:53:46 Speaker 27: a snowy area that we have

00:53:48 Speaker 27: to look after for for five,

00:53:53 Speaker 27: hopefully not six months of the

00:53:56 Speaker 27: year. But it's hard on equipment.

00:53:59 Speaker 27: It's hard on money. It's hard

00:54:02 Speaker 27: on the taxpayer. It's hard on

00:54:04 Speaker 27: people who we're not breaking the

00:54:05 Speaker 27: law if you don't speed. that's

00:54:08 Speaker 27: it's a fundamental easy question. If

00:54:11 Speaker 27: you don't want to get fined,

00:54:13 Speaker 27: don't speed past a school or

00:54:16 Speaker 27: through a community safety zone. Hopefully,

00:54:18 Speaker 27: you learn your lesson. And then

00:54:21 Speaker 27: it's not resultant upon the taxpayers

00:54:23 Speaker 27: who may not have a car,

00:54:27 Speaker 27: who may choose to walk as

00:54:29 Speaker 27: their means of transportation or use

00:54:30 Speaker 27: public transit. These are the people

00:54:33 Speaker 27: now that are being asked to

00:54:36 Speaker 27: pay more taxes for a new

00:54:40 Speaker 27: fund. provincially to resolve to respond

00:54:43 Speaker 27: to speeding that may or may

00:54:46 Speaker 27: not make a difference in moving

00:54:48 Speaker 27: the needle. It reminds me of

00:54:49 Speaker 27: to steal a quote from Abraham

00:54:51 Speaker 27: Lincoln. Let's have a government for

00:54:53 Speaker 27: the people, by the people, and

00:54:55 Speaker 08: that's why I would hope the

00:55:00 Speaker 08: premier would entertain a free vote

00:55:02 Speaker 08: at Queen's Park, so that each

00:55:03 Speaker 08: legislator can represent their people and

00:55:05 Speaker 08: not have a whip vote. Where

00:55:08 Speaker 28: we've lost that ability now to

00:55:12 Speaker 28: have meaningful dialogueue at Queen's Park.

00:55:15 Speaker 28: Let's have democracy. Let's have a

00:55:17 Speaker 28: free vote. Let's have legislators who've

00:55:20 Speaker 28: been elected represent their communities. We

00:55:22 Speaker 28: are here as mayors and deputy

00:55:24 Speaker 28: mayors representing what we think is

00:55:26 Speaker 28: best in our communities. I'm asking

00:55:28 Speaker 28: this council to ensure that we

00:55:31 Speaker 28: have the opportunity. to address those

00:55:35 Speaker 28: items in our community without those

00:55:36 Speaker 28: abilities being taken away from us

00:55:38 Speaker 28: and positioned in the sole hands

00:55:42 Speaker 28: of one person and the prime

00:55:45 Speaker 28: minister's office or the premier's office,

00:55:47 Speaker 28: which has become far too prevalent,

00:55:50 Speaker 28: it seems, in the last several

00:55:54 Speaker 28: years. Thank you. Okay. Thank you

00:55:55 Speaker 28: very much for that introduction. So

00:55:57 Speaker 28: it is now on the floor

00:55:58 Speaker 28: for discussion. From further comments from

00:56:01 Speaker 28: other council members. We'll go to

00:56:04 Speaker 28: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you very much,

00:56:07 Speaker 28: Ward Matrosov. The biggest concern with

00:56:08 Speaker 28: the way the province is addressing

00:56:14 Speaker 28: this is trying to attack it

00:56:17 Speaker 28: as if it is a municipality

00:56:18 Speaker 28: trying to do a cash grab,

00:56:20 Speaker 28: and this is the terminology that

00:56:23 Speaker 28: the premier is using, and it

00:56:25 Speaker 28: is frustrating to what Councillor Greg

00:56:27 Speaker 28: just spoke to, when the objective

00:56:29 Speaker 28: is to try. to change the

00:56:31 Speaker 28: culture of speeding within Ontario. Currently,

00:56:33 Speaker 28: wherever you go, the general culture

00:56:39 Speaker 28: is twenty kilometres over a speed

00:56:41 Speaker 28: limit. We design roads, and then

00:56:43 Speaker 28: we have repeated calls on probably

00:56:45 Speaker 28: weekly basis. For everybody here, gets

00:56:47 Speaker 28: a call from some resident talking

00:56:49 Speaker 28: about the speeding across and in

00:56:51 Speaker 28: front of their property and in

00:56:56 Speaker 28: front of their area. Trying to

00:56:57 Speaker 28: implement a culture change takes many

00:57:00 Speaker 28: different measures. Takes many different methods.

00:57:02 Speaker 28: The premier responded to a letter

00:57:03 Speaker 28: that was sent to him by

00:57:05 Speaker 28: many different mayors and and local

00:57:06 Speaker 28: municipal politicians from across Ontario by

00:57:07 Speaker 29: saying, "If the objective of the

00:57:13 Speaker 29: speed camera is to prevent speeding,

00:57:15 Speaker 29: then it's failing miserably." Well, according

00:57:17 Speaker 24: to that standard, then your stop

00:57:22 Speaker 24: signs are failing, your signage for

00:57:24 Speaker 24: the speed limit is failing, your

00:57:29 Speaker 24: signage for for crosswalks is failing

00:57:33 Speaker 24: because everywhere. there is a culture

00:57:36 Speaker 24: of impatience, of driver lack of

00:57:40 Speaker 24: driver empathy in terms of who's

00:57:42 Speaker 24: around them, it is a method

00:57:45 Speaker 24: to try to address that. In

00:57:47 Speaker 24: addition to all the other things

00:57:51 Speaker 24: we're trying to change, I think

00:57:54 Speaker 24: that there is a frustration with

00:57:58 Speaker 24: Premier Ford overstepping into what the

00:58:01 Speaker 24: motion is speaking to our jurisdiction

00:58:05 Speaker 24: of trying to make controls, but

00:58:06 Speaker 30: fundamentally. for me, this is a

00:58:11 Speaker 30: safety thing that residents bring up

00:58:14 Speaker 30: time and time again. We're trying

00:58:15 Speaker 30: to change the culture, and the

00:58:18 Speaker 30: premier is preventing us from doing.

00:58:19 Speaker 30: Thank you, and we'll go to

00:58:21 Speaker 30: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, and as

00:58:23 Speaker 07: the secondor, thank you for recognizing

00:58:27 Speaker 07: me. I have to echo both

00:58:28 Speaker 07: speakers, both of my colleagues, but

00:58:32 Speaker 07: also, not all municipalities have. are

00:58:33 Speaker 07: are are sorry. Let me rephrase

00:58:35 Speaker 07: this. Most municipalities with automated speed

00:58:37 Speaker 07: enforcement are following the guidelines and

00:58:40 Speaker 07: the revenue that they are getting,

00:58:41 Speaker 07: which isn't the full amount because

00:58:43 Speaker 07: the province gets a significant portion

00:58:44 Speaker 07: of that, are reinvesting the revenue

00:58:47 Speaker 07: specifically for improved safety in those

00:58:49 Speaker 07: community safety zones. So. that the

00:58:51 Speaker 07: taxpayer isn't on the hook for

00:58:56 Speaker 07: those improvements. That's my comment, and

00:59:01 Speaker 07: I was pleased to support this

00:59:03 Speaker 07: motion. Thank you. Other comments? We'll

00:59:04 Speaker 07: go to Councillor McQueen. Thank you,

00:59:05 Speaker 07: Madam Warden. I may be a

00:59:09 Speaker 07: devil devil's advocate here, but just

00:59:11 Speaker 07: I see two parts in this

00:59:13 Speaker 07: notice of motion. One is the

00:59:14 Speaker 07: the ability for municipalities to make

00:59:18 Speaker 07: decisions. Well, back in 1980. 1990.

00:59:20 Speaker 07: Sorry, I gotta get my dates

00:59:22 Speaker 07: here. 2008, 2009. There's what they

00:59:24 Speaker 07: call the Green Energy Act came

00:59:27 Speaker 07: into play. It took away our

00:59:29 Speaker 07: ability to decide for green energy

00:59:30 Speaker 07: projects, and that wasn't playing until

00:59:34 Speaker 07: for quite a long time. And

00:59:35 Speaker 07: there was a lot of discussion

00:59:36 Speaker 07: around that. I know with us

00:59:38 Speaker 07: and Greenhounds, we developed policy around

00:59:39 Speaker 07: placement of turbines, and that was

00:59:40 Speaker 07: early. So it's not unique that

00:59:42 Speaker 07: we've dealt with legislation that does.

00:59:44 Speaker 07: direct or guide or basically tells

00:59:47 Speaker 07: what the lower tier or the

00:59:50 Speaker 07: municipalities what they because we are

00:59:51 Speaker 07: creatures of the province we know

00:59:53 Speaker 07: that right on the part of

00:59:54 Speaker 07: speed cameras I remember at the

00:59:56 Speaker 07: Firesham Fair a few weeks back

00:59:58 Speaker 07: having a large discussion where a

01:00:00 Speaker 07: number of people having concern of

01:00:01 Speaker 07: a of a particular area of

01:00:03 Speaker 07: a municipality south of of Greyhounds

01:00:04 Speaker 07: that had speed cameras. and the

01:00:06 Speaker 07: threshold was two kilometres over the

01:00:09 Speaker 07: speed. So if it was a

01:00:12 Speaker 07: forty, you got a ticket for

01:00:13 Speaker 07: forty-two, which seemed it was quite

01:00:15 Speaker 07: a bit of a concern around

01:00:17 Speaker 07: that. And that I I go

01:00:19 Speaker 07: to the threshold. It was just

01:00:20 Speaker 07: on the news two days ago.

01:00:22 Speaker 07: One of the councillors from the

01:00:23 Speaker 07: City of Toronto is going to

01:00:25 Speaker 07: advocate because the threshold is not

01:00:27 Speaker 07: disclosed. I think in the sense

01:00:29 Speaker 07: of of of our democracy and

01:00:31 Speaker 07: everything else, why don't the people

01:00:34 Speaker 07: know what that threshold is? We'll

01:00:36 Speaker 07: know what that threshold is if

01:00:38 Speaker 07: it's ten over or twelve over

01:00:40 Speaker 07: or five over or two over.

01:00:42 Speaker 07: So I think there's a bit

01:00:43 Speaker 07: of a, and I think as

01:00:45 Speaker 07: as Deputy Mayor or Councillor Nielsen

01:00:47 Speaker 07: said, it's an understanding that if

01:00:48 Speaker 07: you're on a provincial highway or

01:00:51 Speaker 07: municipal road or whatever, that from

01:00:53 Speaker 07: a from a police perspective, if

01:00:55 Speaker 07: you're maybe under fifteen, and yeah,

01:00:56 Speaker 07: that's just the way it has

01:00:57 Speaker 07: been. I think nobody's going to

01:00:59 Speaker 07: disagree with that. We know that.

01:01:00 Speaker 07: So I think the threshold is

01:01:03 Speaker 07: one of the issues that that

01:01:05 Speaker 07: I know that was a big.

01:01:07 Speaker 07: That I know, that was the

01:01:10 Speaker 07: big the discussion that I had

01:01:12 Speaker 07: with a number of people. There,

01:01:14 Speaker 07: some of the other things I've

01:01:17 Speaker 07: heard is is if it was

01:01:20 Speaker 07: set up for community safety zones

01:01:22 Speaker 07: and school zones, I also hear

01:01:24 Speaker 07: it's in other zones. There's no

01:01:26 Speaker 07: debate for the protection of kids

01:01:27 Speaker 07: or those areas where the pedestrians.

01:01:29 Speaker 07: I, you know, maybe there needs

01:01:31 Speaker 07: to be rework of this, but

01:01:33 Speaker 07: not totally out. I don't disagree

01:01:35 Speaker 07: with that, but that is something

01:01:38 Speaker 07: else that it's been other areas

01:01:41 Speaker 07: that I've heard. I don't know

01:01:43 Speaker 07: a lot about. this. Signage has

01:01:44 Speaker 07: been another thing that we interesting

01:01:45 Speaker 07: that the city of Toronto has

01:01:48 Speaker 07: said, "Look, we need more signs

01:01:50 Speaker 07: that we need to tell people."

01:01:51 Speaker 07: So maybe there has been a

01:01:53 Speaker 07: few issues that needs to be

01:01:55 Speaker 07: rectified. I heard of an example

01:01:58 Speaker 30: of that same community, South of

01:02:02 Speaker 30: Grey Highlands, that a fella was

01:02:04 Speaker 30: racing to the hospital because his

01:02:05 Speaker 30: mother was dying at four thirty

01:02:06 Speaker 30: in the morning. At four thirty

01:02:08 Speaker 30: in the morning, and got a

01:02:10 Speaker 30: huge tech. You got a huge

01:02:12 Speaker 30: ticket. We're and and so, is

01:02:16 Speaker 14: a safety zone at four thirty

01:02:19 Speaker 14: in the morning. I know on

01:02:21 Speaker 14: Gray Road Four, we have the

01:02:26 Speaker 14: flashing light and max will goes

01:02:29 Speaker 14: off when it's a school goes

01:02:31 Speaker 14: from fifty to forty. It's a

01:02:33 Speaker 14: school zone. It's reduced speed at

01:02:35 Speaker 14: the time when there's buses and

01:02:38 Speaker 14: kids. So I guess in summary,

01:02:40 Speaker 14: you know, I think the intention

01:02:42 Speaker 14: was there. I think there needs

01:02:44 Speaker 14: to be a rework and some

01:02:47 Speaker 14: of this stuff to maybe get

01:02:48 Speaker 14: more public support. and I just

01:02:50 Speaker 14: think that there's there's a lot

01:02:53 Speaker 14: of there's a lot of dynamics

01:02:56 Speaker 14: here that one size isn't fitting

01:02:58 Speaker 14: all, and I think one of

01:03:01 Speaker 14: the things is the threshold. I'll

01:03:04 Speaker 14: leave it at that. Okay, thank

01:03:06 Speaker 14: you very much. Just looking around

01:03:08 Speaker 14: for any first hands before I

01:03:09 Speaker 14: go back to any additional comments.

01:03:13 Speaker 14: Not seeing any, so I'll go

01:03:16 Speaker 14: back to Council. Oh, I'll go

01:03:18 Speaker 14: to Council Deputy Warden Milne, and

01:03:22 Speaker 14: then over to Councillor Doigreen. Thank

01:03:25 Speaker 14: you, Warden. I think the fundamental

01:03:27 Speaker 14: thing here is the speed limit

01:03:30 Speaker 14: is the law. So if the

01:03:34 Speaker 14: speed limit's forty, you're regardless of

01:03:35 Speaker 31: what you think the threshold should

01:03:41 Speaker 31: be. If you're over forty, you're

01:03:44 Speaker 31: breaking the law, whether you're in

01:03:46 Speaker 31: a safety zone or not. So

01:03:50 Speaker 31: if I hurt somebody in the

01:03:53 Speaker 31: middle of the night at four

01:03:57 Speaker 31: thirty, speed. At 4:30, speeding, do

01:03:58 Speaker 31: I get a lesser fine? Is

01:04:00 Speaker 31: that sort of the logic that

01:04:03 Speaker 31: we're going through here? I had

01:04:07 Speaker 31: a discussion with the local MPP,

01:04:10 Speaker 31: and he stated that he had

01:04:12 Speaker 31: heard that a local business has

01:04:14 Speaker 31: incurred over a thousand dollars in

01:04:16 Speaker 31: speeding fines, and that was unfair.

01:04:19 Speaker 31: I said, well, the logical thing

01:04:25 Speaker 31: would be for that company to

01:04:26 Speaker 31: slow down, and they wouldn't get

01:04:28 Speaker 31: the fine. It's as simple as

01:04:30 Speaker 31: that. But to bring it right

01:04:31 Speaker 31: back to what the motion is

01:04:34 Speaker 31: speaking to, if the premier really

01:04:37 Speaker 07: wants to dictate your municipalities, what

01:04:40 Speaker 07: they should do, there's an election

01:04:41 Speaker 07: next year for municipal government, and

01:04:43 Speaker 07: maybe he should run there. Otherwise,

01:04:44 Speaker 07: stick to your net. Thank you,

01:04:45 Speaker 07: Madam Warden. Thank you. And just

01:04:48 Speaker 07: in follow up, I know that

01:04:52 Speaker 07: the Big City Mayors Caucus from

01:04:56 Speaker 07: AMO and a an interview with

01:04:57 Speaker 07: the Mayor of Burlington, Marianne Mead

01:04:58 Speaker 07: Ward. I believe the ask it's

01:05:01 Speaker 07: not to throw the baby out

01:05:03 Speaker 07: with the bathwater. Don't throw out

01:05:05 Speaker 07: the tool that can benefit our

01:05:08 Speaker 07: communities. Let's visit what the threshold

01:05:11 Speaker 07: should be. Let's visit what. additional

01:05:12 Speaker 07: signage there should be. Let's visit

01:05:14 Speaker 07: if there's a time frame, but

01:05:15 Speaker 07: let's have the conversation as opposed

01:05:18 Speaker 07: to ripping tools out of our

01:05:19 Speaker 07: toolbox that help us protect our

01:05:20 Speaker 07: citizens. Okay, thank you. I don't

01:05:22 Speaker 07: see any other further first hand,

01:05:24 Speaker 07: so I'll go back to Councillor

01:05:26 Speaker 07: McQueen. Well, thank you, Madam Warden,

01:05:28 Speaker 07: and I'm just communicating comments that

01:05:33 Speaker 07: have been made to me. Further

01:05:36 Speaker 07: from that. situation, the individual that,

01:05:38 Speaker 08: and I'll tell you, if I

01:05:39 Speaker 08: have a loved one that's dying

01:05:42 Speaker 08: and I only have so much

01:05:50 Speaker 08: time to get there, I may

01:05:52 Speaker 08: speed as well. It's my choice,

01:05:54 Speaker 08: absolutely. But I have heard that

01:05:55 Speaker 08: that individual has got that ticket

01:05:57 Speaker 08: removed. But the point is, when

01:05:58 Speaker 08: there's a police officer that does

01:06:00 Speaker 08: pull you over, there is maybe

01:06:01 Speaker 08: some discretionary discussion around that. And

01:06:03 Speaker 08: with the tickets, there's no discretionary.

01:06:05 Speaker 08: It's get the ticket. Obviously, this

01:06:07 Speaker 08: individual did follow up and and

01:06:09 Speaker 08: did. But I think, in a

01:06:11 Speaker 08: sense of from a public's perspective,

01:06:13 Speaker 08: it's maybe the public split on

01:06:14 Speaker 08: this. But I think, in a

01:06:15 Speaker 08: sense that maybe to what Councillor

01:06:17 Speaker 08: Debrine has said is, it needs

01:06:20 Speaker 08: to be a rework and and

01:06:22 Speaker 08: maybe use the tool specifically to

01:06:23 Speaker 08: what it's designed for and

01:06:25 Speaker 08: and you know from that. But

01:06:27 Speaker 08: I'm just communicating comments that I

01:06:29 Speaker 08: have received. Okay, thank you. Looking

01:06:31 Speaker 08: online, looking. around the table, not

01:06:33 Speaker 08: seeing any other hands up for

01:06:38 Speaker 08: discussion, so I'll call the vote.

01:06:41 Speaker 08: All those in favour, and that

01:06:43 Speaker 08: motion is carried. Okay. We do

01:06:46 Speaker 08: not have any delegations this morning,

01:06:48 Speaker 08: and I'm just going to. What

01:06:50 Speaker 08: I'm going to do is I'm

01:06:51 Speaker 08: going to ask momentarily about which

01:06:53 Speaker 08: items may or may not be

01:06:56 Speaker 08: pulled from the consent agenda. We'll

01:06:58 Speaker 08: take it down to that point.

01:06:58 Speaker 08: I will then call a. brief

01:07:02 Speaker 08: break. We do have, we do

01:07:04 Speaker 08: have a scheduled agenda, a scheduled

01:07:07 Speaker 08: lunch at a certain time. It

01:07:09 Speaker 08: is so I'm just being conscious

01:07:12 Speaker 08: of that. So we'll have a

01:07:14 Speaker 08: little bit of an earlier, but

01:07:15 Speaker 08: a shorter break because we will

01:07:16 Speaker 08: actually be calling for lunch prior

01:07:18 Speaker 08: to 12 o'clock. So, with that,

01:07:20 Speaker 08: then I will move on to

01:16:15 Speaker 08: number five, which is a determination

01:16:16 Speaker 08: of items requiring separate discussion. There

01:16:19 Speaker 05: are only three listed in item

01:16:34 Speaker 32: six, six A, B, and C.

01:16:36 Speaker 32: Are there any items that someone

01:16:38 Speaker 32: wishes to pull for further discussion?

01:16:40 Speaker 32: Okay, I'm not seeing any hands

01:16:43 Speaker 32: up. That's excellent. So therefore, it's

01:16:46 Speaker 32: recommended that the following consentage items

01:16:48 Speaker 32: consent items be received, and that

01:16:50 Speaker 32: staff be authorised to take the

01:16:53 Speaker 32: actions necessary to give effect to

01:16:55 Speaker 32: the recommendations in the staff reports,

01:16:57 Speaker 32: and that the correspondence be supported

01:16:59 Speaker 32: or received for information as recommended

01:17:02 Speaker 32: in the consent agenda. May I

01:17:04 Speaker 32: ask for a mover and a

01:17:06 Speaker 32: seconder? Move by. A mover and

01:17:09 Speaker 32: a seconder. Moved by Councillor Body,

01:17:11 Speaker 32: seconded by Councillor Nielsen. It's now

01:17:15 Speaker 32: on the floor for discussion.

01:17:18 Speaker 32: Seeing no hands up, all those

01:17:21 Speaker 32: in favour, and that motion is

01:17:23 Speaker 32: carried. So that will mean that

01:17:25 Speaker 32: after a brief break, if we

01:17:28 Speaker 32: could try to be back by

01:17:29 Speaker 32: eleven ten, that would be wonderful.

01:17:31 Speaker 32: We will pick up at item

01:17:33 Speaker 32: seven a when we return. Thank

01:17:51 Speaker 33: you. All right. If I could

01:17:54 Speaker 33: invite our committee, the whole members,

01:17:55 Speaker 33: back to the horseshoe. Okay, so

01:17:58 Speaker 33: we have our quorum here. So

7.a PSR-CW-06-25 Tender Award Feversham Paramedic Base

Director McNab recommended awarding the design-build contract for the Feversham Paramedic Base to Dom Construction, funded by Debender. The project aims to address increased call volume and improve rural response times in the southeast county corner despite facing a budget overage and concerns regarding sole sourcing.

01:18:00 Speaker 33: we will continue then with item

01:18:05 Speaker 33: seven A, and this is the

01:18:07 Speaker 33: first of our items for discussion.

01:18:09 Speaker 33: It is recommended that report PSRCW

01:18:11 Speaker 33: zero six twenty five be received,

01:18:13 Speaker 33: and that the Dom Construction Limited

01:18:15 Speaker 33: be awarded RFP PS zero four

01:18:18 Speaker 33: twenty five design build for the

01:18:19 Speaker 33: new paramedic service base in Feversham

01:18:22 Speaker 33: at a cost of. two million

01:18:24 Speaker 33: one hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars,

01:18:27 Speaker 33: excluding HST, and that the project

01:18:28 Speaker 33: be funded by Debender as approved

01:18:30 Speaker 33: in the 2025 Paramedic Services Capital

01:18:32 Speaker 33: Budget, and that Council authorise staff

01:18:33 Speaker 33: to proceed with the preparations of

01:18:36 Speaker 33: CCDC fourteen twenty thirteen design-build stipulated

01:18:38 Speaker 33: price contract prior to formal Council

01:18:40 Speaker 33: approval, as per Section twenty six

01:18:42 Speaker 33: point six B of the Procedural

01:18:46 Speaker 33: Bylaw. May ask for a mover.

01:18:47 Speaker 33: Okay, so we've got that moved

01:18:49 Speaker 33: by Councillor Nielsen and seconded by

01:18:51 Speaker 33: Councillor Pringle. It's now on the

01:18:53 Speaker 33: floor for discussion. Welcome, Director McNab.

01:18:55 Speaker 33: Morning, Warden County Council. Happy to

01:18:57 Speaker 33: be here today to talk about

01:18:59 Speaker 33: the. new Feversham base with the

01:19:01 Speaker 33: comprehensive deployment review that we did

01:19:03 Speaker 33: in 2022-2023. That review was to

01:19:06 Speaker 33: address increased call volume across the

01:19:07 Speaker 33: county over the next 10 years,

01:19:09 Speaker 33: and with that, we were balancing

01:19:10 Speaker 33: out urban response times with rural

01:19:12 Speaker 33: response times. You know, at the

01:19:15 Speaker 33: same time addressing increased call volume.

01:19:18 Speaker 33: Call volume is expected to go

01:19:19 Speaker 33: up 68% over 10 years, and

01:19:22 Speaker 33: we need roughly about 40%. We

01:19:25 Speaker 33: need roughly about forty percent in

01:19:27 Speaker 33: resources to match that. So, you

01:19:29 Speaker 33: can see the first cars that

01:19:32 Speaker 33: we added were in One Sun

01:19:34 Speaker 33: and Hanover, where our more urban

01:19:36 Speaker 33: areas are, where large volume of

01:19:37 Speaker 33: the calls are. But part of

01:19:46 Speaker 33: the deployment review was to recommend

01:19:49 Speaker 33: to improve rural response times. And

01:19:51 Speaker 33: so, this is the first base

01:19:51 Speaker 33: we're building in Feversham with approval.

01:19:54 Speaker 33: This area is been an under-serviced

01:19:56 Speaker 33: area, but compared to the other

01:19:59 Speaker 33: areas that we've talked about before

01:20:01 Speaker 33: in the past. I believe, Council

01:20:04 Speaker 33: McQueen. We've been talking this probably

01:20:06 Speaker 33: since about twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen.

01:20:08 Speaker 33: That eventually that that would be

01:20:13 Speaker 33: a place that we would go

01:20:15 Speaker 33: to build a base in that

01:20:17 Speaker 33: southeast corner of the county. That

01:20:19 Speaker 33: that area right now is probably

01:20:20 Speaker 33: I think our closest base to

01:20:22 Speaker 33: the Fiverr Sham area is twenty

01:20:25 Speaker 33: one kilometres up to twenty nine

01:20:29 Speaker 33: and Craig Lea. So this will

01:20:32 Speaker 33: definitely enhance that response into that

01:20:33 Speaker 33: area, and again, that's balancing out

01:20:34 Speaker 33: you know the low call volume.

01:20:37 Speaker 33: You know, a low call volume

01:20:39 Speaker 33: versus a a large area to

01:20:43 Speaker 33: cover. So the the site that

01:20:45 Speaker 33: was chosen was at the old

01:20:47 Speaker 33: sand dune at four nine four

01:20:53 Speaker 33: seven forty, Gray Road two, and

01:20:56 Speaker 33: we are we're at the final

01:21:01 Speaker 33: stages and leave of the land

01:21:03 Speaker 33: transfer now with Gray Highlands to

01:21:07 Speaker 33: the county. So we did a

01:21:12 Speaker 33: design build, a partial design build.

01:21:14 Speaker 33: for mechanical, electrical. We did a

01:21:16 Speaker 33: lot of the work as far

01:21:18 Speaker 33: as architectural ourselves. Aaron Whitney, in

01:21:20 Speaker 33: house, great work that he does.

01:21:22 Speaker 33: And we released the tender on

01:21:24 Speaker 33: August fifteenth, and we had the

01:21:25 Speaker 33: results back on September fifteenth. There

01:21:27 Speaker 33: was only one bidder, was Dom

01:21:30 Speaker 33: Construction, and they they met all

01:21:32 Speaker 33: the requirements of the bid. Our

01:21:34 Speaker 33: budget for this project was one

01:21:35 Speaker 33: point six million. The bid cost

01:21:37 Speaker 33: from Dom. came in over budget,

01:21:39 Speaker 33: came in at two million one

01:21:43 Speaker 33: hundred fifty-five thousand, or two million

01:21:45 Speaker 33: one hundred ninety-two thousand with HST.

01:21:46 Speaker 33: We're predicting the professional fees to

01:21:51 Speaker 33: be around two hundred thousand dollars,

01:21:52 Speaker 33: so that makes the total cost

01:21:55 Speaker 33: of the project two million three

01:21:58 Speaker 33: hundred ninety-two thousand, which is an

01:21:59 Speaker 33: overage of seven hundred eighty-six thousand

01:22:01 Speaker 33: one hundred dollars. This project will

01:22:03 Speaker 33: not be completed in twenty twenty-five,

01:22:05 Speaker 33: but if it's approved. it'll be

01:22:08 Speaker 33: moved over to the 2026 capital

01:22:09 Speaker 33: budget. So this project is funded

01:22:15 Speaker 33: completely from dementia. The overage will

01:22:18 Speaker 33: result in a dementia payment going

01:22:19 Speaker 33: from 114,000 to 169,800, which is

01:22:20 Speaker 33: an increase of 55,800. The budgets

01:22:22 Speaker 33: proposed for Aitken, Thornbury, and Cobble

01:22:24 Speaker 33: Beach will also be up. Will

01:22:26 Speaker 33: also be updated to match these

01:22:29 Speaker 33: new numbers, thinking that this may

01:22:31 Speaker 33: be the realistic cost going forward

01:22:33 Speaker 33: for these additional bases. And I

01:22:34 Speaker 33: would like to mention also, and

01:22:36 Speaker 33: we talked about that briefly before,

01:22:44 Speaker 33: but now more formal, we'll bring

01:22:46 Speaker 33: a report forward next week, or

01:22:49 Speaker 33: sorry, next council, that the Dundalk

01:22:51 Speaker 33: base we will have to build

01:22:52 Speaker 33: one there because the fire department

01:22:55 Speaker 33: needs the space, and we'll have

01:22:57 Speaker 33: to find a new location for

01:22:59 Speaker 33: for the Dundalk base. So these.

01:23:00 Speaker 33: So this part of these increases

01:23:01 Speaker 33: are offset by the grant around

01:23:03 Speaker 33: interest and for capital assets from

01:23:07 Speaker 33: the government. When you look at

01:23:09 Speaker 33: our annual increase to the Comprehensive

01:23:10 Speaker 33: Deployment Plan, that's where we pay

01:23:13 Speaker 33: the four hundred ten thousand dollars

01:23:14 Speaker 33: a year. When we build in

01:23:17 Speaker 33: these extra costs to the bases,

01:23:19 Speaker 33: that increase goes up twenty one

01:23:20 Speaker 33: thousand dollars one hundred to four

01:23:21 Speaker 33: hundred thirty one thousand dollars per

01:23:22 Speaker 33: year. So this just chart just

01:23:34 Speaker 34: shows the overage. Now we have

01:23:35 Speaker 34: talked with Dom. We have the

01:23:37 Speaker 10: ability to negotiate because there was

01:23:39 Speaker 10: only one bidder. And not included

01:23:40 Speaker 10: in this, we feel that we

01:23:46 Speaker 10: can find approximately two hundred thousand

01:23:48 Speaker 21: dollars in savings. Just some different

01:23:51 Speaker 21: things that Dom suggests that we

01:23:53 Speaker 21: can do, and we will continue

01:23:55 Speaker 21: to look for other cost savings

01:23:59 Speaker 21: as well as we work through

01:24:01 Speaker 21: the project if this is approved.

01:24:04 Speaker 21: The base is being built to

01:24:06 Speaker 21: net zero, and it does meet

01:24:09 Speaker 21: the requirements of the county to

01:24:12 Speaker 21: continue to build in these net

01:24:17 Speaker 33: zero. If we look at Durham,

01:24:19 Speaker 33: Durham, if we add solar there,

01:24:21 Speaker 33: and be the same with Feversham,

01:24:23 Speaker 33: it would be a net zero

01:24:26 Speaker 33: building. At this time, we don't

01:24:28 Speaker 33: have any additional funding for the

01:24:29 Speaker 33: solar. So this is what the

01:24:32 Speaker 33: base will look like, and. we

01:24:34 Speaker 33: are going to be building again

01:24:36 Speaker 33: with approval, these same basis. So

01:24:41 Speaker 33: hopefully that will save costs down

01:24:43 Speaker 33: the road. It's built for having

01:24:44 Speaker 33: two vehicles and the crew area

01:24:46 Speaker 33: for the ones that were able

01:24:48 Speaker 33: to make it to Durham will

01:24:49 Speaker 33: be similar to what the crew

01:24:50 Speaker 33: area is across the county. Questions.

01:24:52 Speaker 33: Okay, thank you very much for

01:24:53 Speaker 33: that introduction, and we'll put it

01:24:55 Speaker 33: out. to committee. The whole members

01:24:59 Speaker 33: for questions. We'll begin with Councillor

01:25:00 Speaker 33: McKay. Yes, thank you, Kevin. Thank

01:25:06 Speaker 35: you, Warden. I attended the open

01:25:07 Speaker 35: house in Durham, and it was

01:25:09 Speaker 35: stated that it is the state

01:25:14 Speaker 35: of the art. Plus, it was

01:25:18 Speaker 36: the main headquarters for supplies. So,

01:25:19 Speaker 36: these new ones that are being

01:25:20 Speaker 36: built are they on a smaller

01:25:22 Speaker 36: dimension? compared to the one in

01:25:24 Speaker 36: Durham, or would you have another

01:25:26 Speaker 36: one somewhere for main supply station

01:25:27 Speaker 36: too? Yeah, the one in Durham

01:25:28 Speaker 36: was meant to house the our

01:25:29 Speaker 36: logistics and supplies for the county

01:25:31 Speaker 36: as well as our sales supervisor.

01:25:32 Speaker 36: So this that base, that similar

01:25:33 Speaker 36: design, that layout, we will be

01:25:35 Speaker 36: cutting roughly a third of all

01:25:37 Speaker 36: these new bases, and that's roughly

01:25:39 Speaker 36: that extra portion that was meant.

01:25:40 Speaker 36: for maintenance and logistics—that's the

01:25:43 Speaker 36: third. We did change the orientation

01:25:45 Speaker 36: of the garage, so it's a

01:25:49 Speaker 36: true drive-through. So you're not always

01:25:54 Speaker 36: backing in. That was a suggestion

01:25:57 Speaker 36: from staff. It is—you know—you have

01:26:00 Speaker 36: this double-stack base, and you're always

01:26:03 Speaker 36: trying to move in front of

01:26:05 Speaker 36: another vehicle back in. This way,

01:26:06 Speaker 36: it's a true drive-through. So that's

01:26:08 Speaker 36: about the only other difference as

01:26:09 Speaker 36: well. Okay, thank you. I'll look

01:26:12 Speaker 36: around the room. We'll go to

01:26:14 Speaker 36: Councillor Gregg next. Thank you. My

01:26:17 Speaker 36: first question is: Can you expand

01:26:20 Speaker 36: upon what are the components that

01:26:22 Speaker 36: make up the $200,000 in discretionary

01:26:23 Speaker 36: cutbacks? I don't have the list

01:26:29 Speaker 36: in front of me, but I

01:26:31 Speaker 36: can go from memory if that's

01:26:35 Speaker 26: okay. Likely best. There was some

01:26:36 Speaker 26: contingency that we were able to

01:26:38 Speaker 26: reduce based upon our knowledge of

01:26:42 Speaker 26: what Durham's coming at. I wish

01:26:45 Speaker 26: I had the numbers to say

01:26:48 Speaker 26: today, but when we did the

01:26:52 Speaker 26: planning for Durham, I think. we

01:26:54 Speaker 26: did it really well, and we

01:26:56 Speaker 26: were able. We didn't have to

01:27:00 Speaker 26: use that contingency as much as

01:27:03 Speaker 26: what we thought. There's some civil

01:27:05 Speaker 26: work, and we're even looking at

01:27:09 Speaker 26: more now as far as the

01:27:11 Speaker 26: engineering around stormwater management. And we've

01:27:14 Speaker 26: we don't believe that we'll need

01:27:16 Speaker 26: the curbing. We've reduced concrete, and

01:27:21 Speaker 26: we'll change to to asphalt. There

01:27:23 Speaker 26: is reduced the flagpole, reduced the

01:27:25 Speaker 26: fence. We. we talked about the

01:27:28 Speaker 26: building itself about size and in

01:27:31 Speaker 26: talking with Dom, it's like you

01:27:33 Speaker 26: can obviously cut back size, they'll

01:27:34 Speaker 26: cut back some costs, but really

01:27:36 Speaker 26: because you need those major components,

01:27:40 Speaker 26: doesn't really change a lot. So

01:27:44 Speaker 26: we we we went we went

01:27:47 Speaker 26: down that road, but yeah, we

01:27:48 Speaker 26: tried tried to balance those best

01:27:51 Speaker 26: we could. Again, these these those

01:27:53 Speaker 26: savings are not part of that

01:27:56 Speaker 26: total right now. Hopefully that will.

01:27:59 Speaker 26: Thanks for that. So most of

01:28:03 Speaker 26: the savings are outside of the

01:28:05 Speaker 26: building envelope, effectively, from what I'm

01:28:07 Speaker 26: hearing, and I don't. I've got

01:28:11 Speaker 26: them wrote down here. I do

01:28:12 Speaker 26: have significant concerns here with, um,

01:28:16 Speaker 26: before percent professional fees. This is

01:28:19 Speaker 26: something that's 34% over budget with

01:28:22 Speaker 26: professional fees, 49% over budget, and

01:28:24 Speaker 26: it would be more palatable to

01:28:27 Speaker 26: me if there was. three or

01:28:30 Speaker 26: four bidders, but I am not

01:28:35 Speaker 26: comfortable in approving issuing a tender

01:28:37 Speaker 26: for for this project when we're

01:28:39 Speaker 26: effectively forty nine percent over budget.

01:28:41 Speaker 26: We've got some room for cutbacks,

01:28:45 Speaker 26: but you know thirty four percent

01:28:46 Speaker 26: before professional fees, thirty four percent

01:28:48 Speaker 26: with one tender. I think we

01:28:51 Speaker 26: need to take another run at

01:28:52 Speaker 26: this in the. future, and see

01:28:54 Speaker 26: what type of competition in the

01:28:56 Speaker 26: marketplace. I I think Kevin, you

01:29:02 Speaker 26: and your team internally are doing

01:29:03 Speaker 26: a great job of looking at

01:29:05 Speaker 26: where can we shave off some

01:29:11 Speaker 37: savings. And we're as Councillor McKay

01:29:14 Speaker 37: indicated, there is slightly reduced size

01:29:16 Speaker 37: from Durham. These bases going forward

01:29:19 Speaker 36: because it is a centralized place

01:29:20 Speaker 36: in Durham. But there's there's an

01:29:23 Speaker 36: element here that I'm concerned is.

01:29:24 Speaker 36: just because it's debenture, we should

01:29:27 Speaker 36: approve it, but it's it's inflated

01:29:29 Speaker 36: perhaps because there's just not competition

01:29:30 Speaker 36: right now that that was bidding.

01:29:37 Speaker 36: Any time that and it was

01:29:46 Speaker 36: Deputy Warden Mill mentioned earlier, you

01:29:51 Speaker 38: know, as it's not a sole

01:29:56 Speaker 38: source, but he had asked for

01:29:58 Speaker 38: convincing information on a sole sourcing

01:30:04 Speaker 38: item. One one one bidder is.

01:30:06 Speaker 38: also somewhat concerning too. It's it's

01:30:08 Speaker 38: always great to see competition that's

01:30:10 Speaker 38: transparently placed in front of council

01:30:15 Speaker 38: and the public. So at this

01:30:16 Speaker 38: time, I my biggest concern is

01:30:18 Speaker 38: is that there is one bidder.

01:30:20 Speaker 38: They do great work. However, I

01:30:21 Speaker 38: think we should go back out

01:30:28 Speaker 38: in the future and see what

01:30:30 Speaker 10: kind of engagement we do get

01:30:32 Speaker 10: from the from the public sector.

01:30:33 Speaker 10: or from the private sector, again,

01:30:34 Speaker 10: in terms of interest and and

01:30:36 Speaker 10: trying to shave down the the

01:30:37 Speaker 10: overall overall cost of the project.

01:30:40 Speaker 10: Okay, Director Mcnabb, did you want

01:30:43 Speaker 26: to comment, or any Director Spicer

01:30:45 Speaker 26: or anyone else? The budgeted amount

01:30:48 Speaker 26: of 1.6 was a calculation that

01:30:50 Speaker 26: we utilised by looking at other

01:30:52 Speaker 26: builds and price per square foot,

01:30:55 Speaker 26: and that. And that—that's one thing

01:30:56 Speaker 26: that maybe I take responsibility for—is

01:30:58 Speaker 26: that maybe that was lower than

01:30:59 Speaker 26: what we probably should have begun

01:31:00 Speaker 26: with. That's one thing about that,

01:31:02 Speaker 26: and that may be some little

01:31:03 Speaker 26: discrepancy in the prices. I'll just

01:31:05 Speaker 26: let Director Spicer come to the

01:31:08 Speaker 26: lectern. Thank you, Madam Warden. I

01:31:12 Speaker 26: I can understand and appreciate Councillor

01:31:14 Speaker 10: Greg's point as far as having

01:31:16 Speaker 10: one bid. It was publicly advertised,

01:31:18 Speaker 10: and we can't control who bids

01:31:19 Speaker 10: or who doesn't. My concern would

01:31:23 Speaker 10: be we've now got a a

01:31:24 Speaker 10: bid that has been publicly disclosed.

01:31:26 Speaker 10: You would have to wait for

01:31:28 Speaker 23: some period of time. before you

01:31:30 Speaker 23: would go back out because I'd

01:31:31 Speaker 23: be concerned that somebody would say

01:31:32 Speaker 23: that now we're bid shopping, and

01:31:33 Speaker 23: we've disclosed Dom's bid. Okay, thank

01:31:36 Speaker 23: you very much. There's a. I'll

01:31:38 Speaker 23: take that as a follow. I'm

01:31:39 Speaker 23: going to take a follow up

01:31:41 Speaker 23: from Councillor Greg on the same

01:31:43 Speaker 23: topic, and then I'm going to

01:31:44 Speaker 23: go over to Councillor McQueen next.

01:31:45 Speaker 23: And thank you. And I just

01:31:48 Speaker 23: want to be. You don't need

01:31:51 Speaker 23: to take response. You don't need

01:31:53 Speaker 23: to take responsibility at all, because

01:31:56 Speaker 23: it's nothing to to your work

01:31:58 Speaker 23: in preparing the document. I'm just

01:32:02 Speaker 23: commenting on the fact that you

01:32:04 Speaker 23: don't have anything that's coming in

01:32:07 Speaker 23: to be able compare the one

01:32:09 Speaker 23: bid to. So I just, when

01:32:10 Speaker 23: you said I'll take responsibility for

01:32:11 Speaker 23: that, I thought, no, you don't

01:32:13 Speaker 23: have to take responsibility for anything

01:32:14 Speaker 23: because there is no fault to

01:32:16 Speaker 23: be found with with anyone here.

01:32:17 Speaker 23: It's just the discomfort with with

01:32:20 Speaker 23: not having comparables. So, thanks, Kevin.

01:32:24 Speaker 23: Thank you. and I—I just wanted—I

01:32:26 Speaker 23: already had in the queue. Actually,

01:32:43 Speaker 05: virtually, Councillor Bordenyau is going to

01:32:44 Speaker 33: speak first, and then I'll go

01:32:46 Speaker 33: to Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Madam

01:32:48 Speaker 33: Warden, through you to County Council.

01:32:50 Speaker 33: Good morning again. I have less

01:32:52 Speaker 33: less concerns about the one bid

01:32:54 Speaker 33: only because they don't at the

01:32:56 Speaker 33: time when they're bidding, they don't

01:32:58 Speaker 33: know how many bids are going

01:33:05 Speaker 33: to be coming in. So there

01:33:07 Speaker 33: could be ten. The the the

01:33:10 Speaker 33: winning proponent does not know that.

01:33:11 Speaker 33: So that that's less of a

01:33:12 Speaker 23: concern to me. The one concern,

01:33:14 Speaker 23: if any. delay that we do,

01:33:18 Speaker 23: we know that construction costs more

01:33:20 Speaker 23: money. So if we delay any

01:33:21 Speaker 23: further, we've seen time and time

01:33:23 Speaker 23: again with with builds, with roads,

01:33:27 Speaker 39: each month, each quarter, each year

01:33:28 Speaker 39: will exponentially add to the cost

01:33:33 Speaker 39: of the same thing. My question

01:33:37 Speaker 39: is, I'm just reading. You're asking

01:33:39 Speaker 38: council for two million one hundred

01:33:42 Speaker 38: fifty-five thousand. The expected cost is

01:33:45 Speaker 38: two three nine two nine hundred.

01:33:46 Speaker 38: It's saying there will be a

01:33:50 Speaker 38: savings. of two hundred dollars, but

01:33:52 Speaker 38: that's not reflected in the chart.

01:33:53 Speaker 38: So, just for clarity purposes, is

01:33:57 Speaker 38: that the reason why the committee

01:34:01 Speaker 38: is being asked for two million

01:34:04 Speaker 38: one hundred fifty-five thousand as opposed

01:34:07 Speaker 38: to two three nine two nine

01:34:09 Speaker 38: hundred? Just for clarity purposes, through

01:34:10 Speaker 38: the the warden. Yeah. Yeah. Today,

01:34:12 Speaker 38: the award is to Dom for

01:34:14 Speaker 38: two million one hundred ninety-two thousand.

01:34:21 Speaker 38: But also bringing forward that the

01:34:22 Speaker 38: project we're expecting to be professional

01:34:25 Speaker 38: fees two hundred thousand. Again, that

01:34:28 Speaker 07: doesn't include any savings that we

01:34:29 Speaker 07: can work out with Dom. So

01:34:33 Speaker 07: the the award today is for

01:34:36 Speaker 07: Dom of two million one hundred

01:34:39 Speaker 07: ninety-two thousand. Okay. Is there any

01:34:40 Speaker 07: follow up to that? Councillor Bourneau.

01:34:43 Speaker 07: Yes, Madam Ward. Just so, just

01:34:46 Speaker 07: as a follow up. So, but

01:34:47 Speaker 07: we're being asked for two million

01:34:48 Speaker 07: one hundred and fifty five thousand

01:34:49 Speaker 07: dollars. So, where where would the

01:34:50 Speaker 07: reflection of the savings be at

01:34:52 Speaker 07: the end of the day, if

01:34:54 Speaker 07: there is any of the two

01:34:56 Speaker 07: hundred thousand? Okay, we'll just give

01:34:58 Speaker 07: a moment for Director Spicer and

01:34:59 Speaker 07: Director McNaught to come forward with

01:35:01 Speaker 07: a response to that. Through you,

01:35:03 Speaker 07: Madam Warden, to respond to Councillor

01:35:06 Speaker 07: Bourdonneau's question, what you're being asked

01:35:07 Speaker 07: for is to approve the award

01:35:10 Speaker 07: of two million one hundred and

01:35:11 Speaker 07: fifty-five thousand. And so, the the

01:35:12 Speaker 07: chart that you've seen on page

01:35:13 Speaker 07: three of the report, the expected

01:35:18 Speaker 07: costs include the non-rebatable HST, and

01:35:19 Speaker 07: if we find the savings that

01:35:21 Speaker 07: Director McNab has identified. Councillor McNab

01:35:24 Speaker 07: has identified those would be in

01:35:26 Speaker 07: the form of negative change orders

01:35:27 Speaker 07: that would reduce the total value

01:35:30 Speaker 07: of the contract. But the award

01:35:32 Speaker 07: today would be the two million

01:35:33 Speaker 07: one hundred fifty-five thousand, excluding HST.

01:35:35 Speaker 07: Okay. Thank you. Next, we'll go

01:35:36 Speaker 07: to Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Madam

01:35:39 Speaker 07: Warden. A couple things. Start off

01:35:40 Speaker 07: with County Council is only paying

01:35:43 Speaker 07: two dollars for the land. Same.

01:35:45 Speaker 07: So I think just going back

01:35:47 Speaker 07: to comes from Berganov with regards

01:35:49 Speaker 07: to process. I think we have

01:35:50 Speaker 07: to protect our process because I

01:35:51 Speaker 07: think in fairness to dome construction,

01:35:53 Speaker 07: which has been in business for

01:35:55 Speaker 07: a long time, they've been doing

01:35:59 Speaker 07: a lot of municipal buildings, a

01:36:01 Speaker 07: lot of buildings. So I don't

01:36:02 Speaker 07: think there's any debate of their

01:36:03 Speaker 07: quality of work. You know, they

01:36:06 Speaker 07: had no indication or knowledge that

01:36:07 Speaker 07: they're they only sold bitter until

01:36:08 Speaker 07: so it comes out. So I

01:36:09 Speaker 07: don't think there's any fault of

01:36:11 Speaker 07: anybody there. Obviously. it's it's unfortunate

01:36:14 Speaker 07: that it's higher than what was

01:36:16 Speaker 07: budgeted, but I think we look

01:36:17 Speaker 07: at last couple years, construction costs

01:36:19 Speaker 07: are continuing to rise, and everything

01:36:20 Speaker 07: else. You know, just go to

01:36:22 Speaker 07: Home Depot and buy something you

01:36:24 Speaker 07: bought two years ago. Everything's out.

01:36:25 Speaker 07: The other thing I want to

01:36:26 Speaker 07: say is yes, what Kevin made

01:36:28 Speaker 07: a comment was this area, you

01:36:30 Speaker 07: know, has been an underserviced area,

01:36:33 Speaker 07: and I did raise it, and

01:36:35 Speaker 07: then we had we had a.

01:36:38 Speaker 07: company that did the study and

01:36:40 Speaker 07: showed improved that it was an

01:36:42 Speaker 07: underserved area. I know a number

01:36:43 Speaker 07: of years back there was a

01:36:45 Speaker 07: young man that was badly injured,

01:36:47 Speaker 07: and I know for the area

01:36:50 Speaker 07: with regards to either Thornbury, Markville,

01:36:52 Speaker 07: or Dundalk, time is of the

01:36:54 Speaker 07: essence when when somebody is seriously

01:36:57 Speaker 07: injured, and unfortunately he lost his

01:37:04 Speaker 07: life. And not saying is any

01:37:05 Speaker 07: fault of anybody, but there was

01:37:07 Speaker 07: a bit of a delay getting

01:37:08 Speaker 07: there, just getting to serve to

01:37:10 Speaker 07: serve that individual. And I remember

01:37:12 Speaker 36: the. Conversation about that with an

01:37:14 Speaker 36: individual, and you know, it's too

01:37:16 Speaker 36: bad. But obviously, the study showed

01:37:17 Speaker 36: that it was an underserved area,

01:37:25 Speaker 36: and traffic and everything in that

01:37:26 Speaker 36: area is growing. You know, with

01:37:28 Speaker 36: the growth in Blue Mountains and

01:37:30 Speaker 36: everything else, Gray Road Two, Thirty

01:37:31 Speaker 36: One, Gray Road Four, One Twenty

01:37:35 Speaker 36: Four. You know, it's just the

01:37:38 Speaker 36: traffic patterns have changed, and it's

01:37:40 Speaker 36: just more and more people that's

01:37:42 Speaker 36: travelling through the area. So, I

01:37:46 Speaker 40: think the justification is there. It's

01:37:47 Speaker 40: just unfortunate. It's a little higher

01:37:50 Speaker 40: than we are, but I I

01:37:51 Speaker 40: don't think we can wait. I

01:37:54 Speaker 40: think we need to move. forward.

01:37:57 Speaker 40: The other comment I do have

01:38:01 Speaker 40: for you, Kevin, is if there

01:38:04 Speaker 40: is a need, like just like

01:38:05 Speaker 40: the Dundalk building where they they

01:38:09 Speaker 40: need it for expanding their fire

01:38:11 Speaker 40: hall, can this building be added

01:38:12 Speaker 40: to an extra bay? Is it

01:38:15 Speaker 40: designed that way? Is there a

01:38:16 Speaker 40: possibility that somewhere down the future,

01:38:17 Speaker 40: just like the situation you you

01:38:19 Speaker 40: mentioned in in Dundalk, it is.

01:38:21 Speaker 40: Is I guess anything can be

01:38:23 Speaker 40: added to, but is there any

01:38:25 Speaker 40: any incorporation of that? ever being

01:38:27 Speaker 40: incorporated into this building. I also

01:38:29 Speaker 40: don't have the information. I can

01:38:30 Speaker 40: answer that. I would think you

01:38:32 Speaker 40: could be able to add beside

01:38:34 Speaker 40: it, but it also needs on

01:38:36 Speaker 40: size of land and those type

01:38:39 Speaker 40: of things. But I also don't

01:38:47 Speaker 40: have enough expertise enough to ask.

01:38:49 Speaker 33: Aaron would probably the best person

01:38:50 Speaker 33: to ask. I only asked it

01:38:52 Speaker 33: because somebody asked me to ask

01:38:53 Speaker 33: that question because that was a

01:38:56 Speaker 33: thought that somebody made to me,

01:38:58 Speaker 33: so I was asking the question

01:39:00 Speaker 33: on that part. Okay, thank you.

01:39:02 Speaker 33: So, as we focus in on

01:39:03 Speaker 33: our discussion on the question that's

01:39:04 Speaker 33: at hand here, we'll go to

01:39:06 Speaker 33: the Deputy Warden next. Thank you,

01:39:08 Speaker 33: Madam Warden, and thank you, Kevin,

01:39:10 Speaker 33: for the report. In there, you

01:39:12 Speaker 33: mentioned that this building and the

01:39:14 Speaker 33: Durham one, and indeed. And the

01:39:15 Speaker 33: Durham one, indeed, as well, will

01:39:16 Speaker 33: be net zero ready. I'm wondering

01:39:19 Speaker 33: how much that cost adds to

01:39:20 Speaker 33: the bill, because I can appreciate

01:39:26 Speaker 33: that we want to reduce our

01:39:29 Speaker 08: energy consumption. And the thought is,

01:39:30 Speaker 08: we could put solar panels on

01:39:33 Speaker 08: at a future date. But I

01:39:34 Speaker 08: think the reality is, most builds

01:39:38 Speaker 08: don't have that done. You either

01:39:39 Speaker 08: put them on when you're building

01:39:42 Speaker 08: the thing, or it doesn't happen.

01:39:43 Speaker 08: It's like adding. bays to it

01:39:45 Speaker 08: later; not likely going to happen.

01:39:50 Speaker 08: And as time goes on, it

01:39:53 Speaker 08: becomes less cost efficient to add

01:39:55 Speaker 08: new stuff to an old building.

01:39:57 Speaker 08: So I'm just wondering: is there

01:40:00 Speaker 08: a potential if we're not going

01:40:01 Speaker 08: to put the panels on now,

01:40:05 Speaker 08: would there be some savings in

01:40:05 Speaker 08: not allowing the building to do

01:40:08 Speaker 08: that in the near future? Please.

01:40:10 Speaker 08: Yes, that is something we could

01:40:11 Speaker 08: look at. One thing that we

01:40:17 Speaker 08: were wanting to do, and we're

01:40:18 Speaker 33: still working through, is looking for

01:40:20 Speaker 33: grants to for these net zero

01:40:22 Speaker 33: initiatives. With that, would cover the

01:40:25 Speaker 33: cost. Solar for Durham, I believe,

01:40:27 Speaker 33: was two hundred twenty five thousand.

01:40:28 Speaker 33: That you know we'd be able

01:40:30 Speaker 33: to get a grant. Hopefully, let

01:40:31 Speaker 33: someday that working through that work

01:40:33 Speaker 33: to be able to get to

01:40:34 Speaker 33: get to a net zero. But

01:40:36 Speaker 33: is it something that could be

01:40:38 Speaker 33: taken out? We could. Like I

01:40:41 Speaker 33: think that's something we look at.

01:40:42 Speaker 33: Things like EV chargers and I

01:40:44 Speaker 33: guess you look at heat pumps

01:40:48 Speaker 33: and stuff like that, and types

01:40:49 Speaker 33: of windows and wall thickness. Okay,

01:40:51 Speaker 33: thank you. Looking around the room,

01:40:54 Speaker 33: I don't see any further hands

01:40:57 Speaker 33: up nor online. Okay, I think

01:40:59 Speaker 33: we're ready. Call that question. Then

01:41:02 Speaker 33: all those in favour? Okay, and

01:41:03 Speaker 33: that motion is carried. Thank you.

01:41:05 Speaker 33: All right. So Director McNab, don't

01:41:08 Speaker 33: go far. We'll have a look

7.b PSR-CW-07-25 Additional Funding to Support SOS and Extended Services

Council considered a report recommending the receipt of additional funding to support Safe and Sound (SOS) and extended services through partner agencies until March 31st, 2026. The proposed grant aims to fund two navigators in Owen Sound for seven days a week, provide administrative support, and purchase basic needs supplies like waterproof boots, coats, food, tents, and sleeping bags. Councillors discussed the necessity of this federal funding to address the opioid crisis without increasing property tax burdens, noting that while the current allocation is a six-month trial, successful outcomes could lead to requests for sustained provincial or federal support.

01:41:11 Speaker 33: at number seven B here. It's

01:41:14 Speaker 33: recommended that report PSRCW 0725, being

01:41:15 Speaker 33: a report on additional funding to

01:41:18 Speaker 33: support SOS and extended services, be

01:41:20 Speaker 33: received, and that the funds be

01:41:21 Speaker 33: flowed to partner agencies as outlined

01:41:23 Speaker 33: in the funding agreement that ends

01:41:26 Speaker 33: March 31st, 2026. May I ask

01:41:28 Speaker 33: for a mover and a seconder?

01:41:29 Speaker 33: Moved by Councillor Dicker, seconded by

01:41:30 Speaker 33: the Deputy Warden. It's now on

01:41:35 Speaker 33: the floor for discussion. And Director

01:41:37 Speaker 33: McNab, over to you. Okay, happy

01:41:44 Speaker 33: to be here to talk about

01:41:46 Speaker 33: this this morning. You remember earlier

01:41:51 Speaker 33: this year we were approved for

01:41:52 Speaker 33: funding to increase our response to

01:41:53 Speaker 33: the opioid crisis, and we were

01:41:56 Speaker 33: able to move our supportive outreach

01:42:02 Speaker 26: services to seven days a week.

01:42:05 Speaker 26: Which we're still, you know, working

01:42:05 Speaker 26: through that and getting the staffing

01:42:07 Speaker 26: up to date to do that,

01:42:11 Speaker 26: but also increasing the resources to

01:42:12 Speaker 26: be able to respond to that

01:42:13 Speaker 26: emergency. Part of the work that

01:42:17 Speaker 26: we're doing, we were asked about.

01:42:20 Speaker 26: doing additional work again to target,

01:42:22 Speaker 26: you know, the overdose crisis. So

01:42:24 Speaker 26: we did put in for additional

01:42:27 Speaker 26: funding on top of what we've

01:42:28 Speaker 26: already received. This would to further

01:42:30 Speaker 26: support initiatives within the county. What

01:42:33 Speaker 26: it will do is support a

01:42:34 Speaker 26: navigator programme in in the city

01:42:36 Speaker 26: of Owen Sound to have two

01:42:37 Speaker 26: navigators on seven days a week

01:42:39 Speaker 26: to support people. It also is

01:42:40 Speaker 26: to support treatments space at Safe

01:42:43 Speaker 26: and Sound. for SOS, it'll give

01:42:47 Speaker 26: us ability to have some administrative

01:42:49 Speaker 26: support for the team. The team's

01:42:51 Speaker 26: growing to be able to dedicate

01:42:58 Speaker 26: it, as opposed to being off

01:43:00 Speaker 26: the side of someone's desk, and

01:43:01 Speaker 26: also be able to increase the

01:43:04 Speaker 26: number of amount of basic needs

01:43:06 Speaker 33: to people to be able to

01:43:08 Speaker 33: start doing that. So this is

01:43:09 Speaker 33: 100% funded through this funding grant,

01:43:11 Speaker 33: and it will go until March

01:43:12 Speaker 33: 31st, 2026. Okay, thank you very

01:43:15 Speaker 33: much. So we do have it

01:43:17 Speaker 33: out open for discussion. Any discussion?

01:43:19 Speaker 33: Okay, so we're going to begin

01:43:19 Speaker 33: with Councillor Greg, then go to

01:43:21 Speaker 33: Councillor Eccles. Thank you. Through the

01:43:22 Speaker 33: Warden, two key questions, Kevin. Some

01:43:25 Speaker 33: of the I'm certainly aware within

01:43:27 Speaker 33: our own sound of some of

01:43:29 Speaker 33: the concerns of the business community

01:43:31 Speaker 33: in terms of individual. In terms

01:43:33 Speaker 33: of individuals, particularly at the start

01:43:35 Speaker 33: of the day, in front of

01:43:37 Speaker 33: businesses and the social navigators here

01:43:39 Speaker 33: spoken to in in the report,

01:43:40 Speaker 33: will support that. Could you expand

01:43:42 Speaker 33: more so on terms of what

01:43:43 Speaker 33: that what their job would look

01:43:44 Speaker 33: like beyond that? Because upfront, that's

01:43:45 Speaker 33: the most familiarity is to the

01:43:47 Speaker 33: pressing need is businesses to like

01:43:50 Speaker 33: we need support first thing in

01:43:52 Speaker 33: the morning to be able to

01:43:54 Speaker 33: to open our doors. Once the

01:43:56 Speaker 33: day starts, the day is different

01:43:58 Speaker 33: than first thing in the morning.

01:44:02 Speaker 33: And also, could you expand on

01:44:04 Speaker 33: what ninety-four thousand dollars in materials,

01:44:07 Speaker 33: supplies, equipment looks like? What is

01:44:12 Speaker 33: that? Because this is just till

01:44:17 Speaker 33: March, so I guess effectively five

01:44:19 Speaker 33: five months. So, thanks. Yes. So

01:44:21 Speaker 33: the navigators, the the main role

01:44:22 Speaker 33: of that is to help the

01:44:25 Speaker 33: people that are that are unhoused,

01:44:27 Speaker 33: community members that. need support in

01:44:28 Speaker 33: the community, so they would be

01:44:30 Speaker 33: working with them not just in

01:44:33 Speaker 33: the morning but all day long

01:44:34 Speaker 33: to be able to connect them

01:44:36 Speaker 33: to supports and to you know

01:44:38 Speaker 33: meet their needs. Also, the big

01:44:50 Speaker 41: thing would be doing referrals, but

01:44:51 Speaker 26: they could do a number of

01:44:52 Speaker 26: different things. They can do sharps

01:44:54 Speaker 26: cleanup. They can, if there was

01:44:55 Speaker 26: items left, they can work with

01:44:58 Speaker 26: that. Again, the the big thing

01:45:00 Speaker 26: is helping those community members, which

01:45:02 Speaker 26: ultimately you help them. That helps

01:45:03 Speaker 26: everybody, and so that's that's the

01:45:06 Speaker 26: main plan of this. this is

01:45:10 Speaker 26: something that's been proposed by at

01:45:14 Speaker 26: least two agencies before. It's more

01:45:16 Speaker 26: like it's a trial to see

01:45:18 Speaker 26: how it goes. So I think

01:45:20 Speaker 26: it's a good opportunity to have

01:45:22 Speaker 26: funding to be able to do

01:45:23 Speaker 26: that and see what those outcomes

01:45:26 Speaker 26: are like from it. The basic

01:45:29 Speaker 26: needs it could be from clothes.

01:45:31 Speaker 26: Right, we're getting waterproof boots. We've

01:45:33 Speaker 26: seen a lot of medical concerns

01:45:34 Speaker 26: around wet feet with people that

01:45:37 Speaker 26: live outside, but they don't have

01:45:38 Speaker 26: waterproof boots. Significant money around that.

01:45:44 Speaker 26: Coats, food. There are some. you

01:45:48 Speaker 26: know, us as far as like

01:45:52 Speaker 26: there's supplies. In that is, there's

01:45:53 Speaker 42: a food part of that. There's

01:45:55 Speaker 42: tents, sleeping bags, for people that

01:46:00 Speaker 42: are living outside to be able

01:46:02 Speaker 42: to do that. So yeah, there's

01:46:05 Speaker 42: a number of items. A whole

01:46:07 Speaker 42: list, and we have to spend

01:46:09 Speaker 42: it by then, and we'll do

01:46:11 Speaker 42: our best to distribute it. But

01:46:13 Speaker 42: you know, obviously, we will. ensure

01:46:18 Speaker 42: it goes. You know, it means

01:46:21 Speaker 42: I had it by March, but

01:46:24 Speaker 42: we'll have it, and it'll ultimately

01:46:27 Speaker 42: be able to be carried on.

01:46:30 Speaker 42: On. Well, sorry. Okay, thank you

01:46:34 Speaker 42: for expanding on that, Kevin. I'm

01:46:39 Speaker 42: glad to hear about the additional

01:46:40 Speaker 42: help in the community in terms

01:46:42 Speaker 42: of just clean up. Just a

01:46:44 Speaker 42: week ago, Saturday, I was through

01:46:47 Speaker 42: the. Julie MacArthur Rec Centre, and

01:46:51 Speaker 42: there's individuals doing drugs in the

01:46:55 Speaker 42: community at the skateboard park. That's

01:46:57 Speaker 42: not a very welcoming scene for

01:47:01 Speaker 42: people that want to have fun

01:47:06 Speaker 42: outdoors through in great weather at

01:47:11 Speaker 42: the skateboard park. And it's a

01:47:14 Speaker 42: it's been a certainly a drain,

01:47:16 Speaker 42: a huge drain on city staff

01:47:20 Speaker 42: for for several years as they

01:47:22 Speaker 42: try to respond to these ongoing

01:47:25 Speaker 42: items 24 hours a day, and

01:47:28 Speaker 42: and that's. an instance that just

01:47:32 Speaker 42: shines light on what kind of

01:47:35 Speaker 42: challenges exist in the community from

01:47:36 Speaker 42: from some of the behaviours there.

01:47:40 Speaker 42: So thanks. Good to hear that

01:47:45 Speaker 42: kind of support is also something

01:47:46 Speaker 42: that this this will complement. Thanks.

01:47:49 Speaker 42: We'll go to Councillor Eccles. Thank

01:47:52 Speaker 42: you, Madam Warden. Through you, there's

01:47:53 Speaker 42: no doubt there's a need in

01:47:56 Speaker 42: our community for this opioid crisis.

01:47:57 Speaker 42: My fear was one that I've

01:48:00 Speaker 42: shared maybe with this council a

01:48:03 Speaker 42: couple of times and continually for

01:48:06 Speaker 42: a number of years. Here we

01:48:08 Speaker 42: have funding, federal funding, coming at

01:48:12 Speaker 42: a hundred percent for six months

01:48:14 Speaker 42: for us to expand our SOS

01:48:17 Speaker 42: programme. Is this a healthcare issue?

01:48:19 Speaker 42: In my mind, yes, it is.

01:48:26 Speaker 42: Property tax supposed to look after

01:48:28 Speaker 42: healthcare. How much downloading is this?

01:48:29 Speaker 42: Great, we're getting into it for

01:48:32 Speaker 42: six months. Six years from now,

01:48:34 Speaker 42: council around here, which I may

01:48:35 Speaker 42: be here, I may not be

01:48:37 Speaker 42: here, be able to express to

01:48:44 Speaker 42: them, how did we get to

01:48:46 Speaker 42: this? We're spending eight and a

01:48:53 Speaker 42: half million dollars. We've had to

01:48:54 Speaker 42: delay building ambulance. base because we

01:48:56 Speaker 42: haven't got any money because our

01:48:59 Speaker 33: paramedics are running around doing healthcare

01:49:01 Speaker 33: issues. It it's a slippery slope.

01:49:03 Speaker 33: It's one that I we need

01:49:04 Speaker 33: it, but do we need those

01:49:05 Speaker 33: that are supposed to be looking

01:49:07 Speaker 33: after this? It's the guaranteed funding.

01:49:10 Speaker 33: I guess. we're probably the best,

01:49:11 Speaker 33: our paramedics to deliver the service,

01:49:13 Speaker 33: and I don't think there's any

01:49:15 Speaker 33: question to that. But how much

01:49:20 Speaker 33: can we deliver, and take as

01:49:23 Speaker 33: a download from the province, from

01:49:24 Speaker 33: the feds, to keep doing their

01:49:26 Speaker 33: job, to the taxpayer? Maybe we

01:49:28 Speaker 33: should go to the feds and

01:49:31 Speaker 33: to Doug Ford, and say, we

01:49:34 Speaker 33: need more. of those that are

01:49:37 Speaker 33: breaking the law by speeding, so

01:49:40 Speaker 33: that we can have the funds

01:49:41 Speaker 33: to be able to do their

01:49:44 Speaker 33: job. That was a little bit

01:49:47 Speaker 33: in jest, but the idea of

01:49:49 Speaker 33: this being a six-month, hundred percent

01:49:51 Speaker 33: funded, once we're into it, it's

01:49:53 Speaker 33: going to be very hard to

01:49:56 Speaker 33: get out of it. Extremely hard

01:49:58 Speaker 33: to get out of it, and

01:50:00 Speaker 33: then it falls. to the property

01:50:01 Speaker 33: taxpayers to support it. That's

01:50:03 Speaker 33: my fear. I will be supporting

01:50:05 Speaker 33: it at this point in time,

01:50:07 Speaker 33: but it's one thing to look

01:50:08 Speaker 33: down. We've got to keep the

01:50:17 Speaker 33: pressure on. Who should be looking

01:50:20 Speaker 13: after it? We're delivering a service.

01:50:23 Speaker 13: We're not building a service. Okay.

01:50:25 Speaker 13: Thank you, Director Murtha. Did you

01:50:28 Speaker 13: want to comment, Charles? Did you

01:50:30 Speaker 13: want to comment, or yeah, I

01:50:32 Speaker 13: don't disagree. This is health, but

01:50:32 Speaker 13: it's also social services as well.

01:50:34 Speaker 13: Housing first, social support means a

01:50:36 Speaker 13: lot. Like if we can't support

01:50:37 Speaker 13: people in housing and social services,

01:50:40 Speaker 13: a lot of the work we

01:50:41 Speaker 13: do in health really doesn't add

01:50:42 Speaker 13: up. And so it's tackling that.

01:50:44 Speaker 13: This, really, to tell you the

01:50:47 Speaker 13: truth, a lot of these enhancements,

01:50:50 Speaker 13: paramedic services is only one small

01:50:52 Speaker 13: piece of pie. We work with

01:50:53 Speaker 13: partners. CMHA, Bright Shores, and the

01:50:55 Speaker 13: United Way, Safe and Sound. We

01:50:57 Speaker 13: work with public health, and there's

01:50:58 Speaker 13: 25 partners beyond that. This is

01:51:00 Speaker 13: something that's very complex and requires

01:51:04 Speaker 30: a lot of agencies to to

01:51:07 Speaker 30: address. This funding will go till

01:51:09 Speaker 30: this specific funding goes to March

01:51:13 Speaker 30: 31st, 2026. But we do have

01:51:15 Speaker 24: funding for seven days a week

01:51:20 Speaker 24: until mid-January 2027. So it does

01:51:24 Speaker 24: it is longer. and our SOS

01:51:26 Speaker 24: funding. We've been fortunate. That is

01:51:28 Speaker 24: permanent funding. That is base funding.

01:51:30 Speaker 24: It's not. It's 100 funded by

01:51:33 Speaker 24: the province. So that is something

01:51:35 Speaker 24: that even without this, we'll still

01:51:39 Speaker 24: have that programme of the core

01:51:43 Speaker 24: of four days a week with

01:51:45 Speaker 24: our paramedic, nurse practitioner, mental health

01:51:47 Speaker 24: counselors, and social navigator. That that

01:51:50 Speaker 24: is on public funding, considered base.

01:51:53 Speaker 24: These these have just been in

01:51:59 Speaker 24: addition to. Through you, Warden, and

01:52:01 Speaker 24: further to Director McNab, indicated earlier

01:52:03 Speaker 24: that this this is a trial

01:52:05 Speaker 43: to see if some of these

01:52:09 Speaker 43: these measures can can can work.

01:52:12 Speaker 43: I think that'll hopefully provide us,

01:52:14 Speaker 43: if it's successful, provide us with

01:52:16 Speaker 43: some further evidence to be able

01:52:19 Speaker 43: to go to the provincial and

01:52:21 Speaker 43: federal government to say that we

01:52:22 Speaker 43: need some sustained funding in order

01:52:23 Speaker 43: to keep these programmemes going. So

01:52:26 Speaker 43: I think I think that's something

01:52:28 Speaker 43: that's just to keep in mind.

01:52:31 Speaker 43: I guess. In terms of, it

01:52:33 Speaker 43: is it is on a trial

01:52:36 Speaker 43: basis to to test this out.

01:52:37 Speaker 43: We think this will be very

01:52:40 Speaker 43: successful, but we'll be able to

01:52:42 Speaker 43: have that evidence and true data

01:52:43 Speaker 43: to be able to report back

01:52:45 Speaker 43: to the province and federal government

01:52:46 Speaker 43: to say we need sustained funding

01:52:47 Speaker 43: to keep this going. Okay, we'll

01:52:56 Speaker 43: go to Councillor Dobrine and then

01:53:02 Speaker 43: to Councillor Body. Thank you, and

01:53:03 Speaker 22: through you, Warden Matrasov. Matrosov, to

01:53:06 Speaker 22: that point, with regard to collecting

01:53:09 Speaker 22: the data to support ongoing the

01:53:11 Speaker 22: ongoing service, would we have sufficient

01:53:12 Speaker 22: indication by Roma that would allow

01:53:15 Speaker 22: us to have a delegation at

01:53:17 Speaker 22: that point in time, or consider

01:53:22 Speaker 22: a delegation to present some of

01:53:24 Speaker 22: the preliminary findings? Because if the

01:53:27 Speaker 22: funding is going to expire in

01:53:30 Speaker 22: March, then what? We could maybe

01:53:33 Speaker 22: provide the data, and the pilot

01:53:35 Speaker 22: could be extended, or you know,

01:53:37 Speaker 22: more permanent funding. It's perhaps not

01:53:40 Speaker 22: an answer we can arrive at

01:53:42 Speaker 22: today, but something to consider. Through

01:53:43 Speaker 22: you, Warden. Thank you for that

01:53:44 Speaker 22: question, Councillor Debrine. As part of

01:53:46 Speaker 22: the initial funding that we received

01:53:47 Speaker 22: from the federal government, was to

01:53:50 Speaker 22: fund. a a 0.25 or part-time

01:53:52 Speaker 22: data analyst to help track and

01:53:54 Speaker 22: and report on some of this

01:53:55 Speaker 22: data. Whether or not we'll have

01:53:56 Speaker 22: enough results pre-Roma for for this

01:54:01 Speaker 22: particular piece will be a bit

01:54:04 Speaker 22: of a question mark. But hopefully,

01:54:06 Speaker 22: we'll have these at least some

01:54:08 Speaker 22: initial results that may inform a

01:54:10 Speaker 22: delegation brief if that's where council

01:54:12 Speaker 22: wants to consider that. Those those

01:54:15 Speaker 22: delegation requests are will likely be

01:54:16 Speaker 22: discussed by council usually in November.

01:54:17 Speaker 22: So usually in November, so we're

01:54:18 Speaker 22: already tracking a list of potential

01:54:20 Speaker 22: delegation requests based on council's discussions.

01:54:21 Speaker 22: This is one that we can

01:54:22 Speaker 22: potentially add to that list and

01:54:23 Speaker 22: see what data and information that

01:54:24 Speaker 22: we have at that time to

01:54:26 Speaker 22: be able to go forward to

01:54:28 Speaker 22: Roma. Councillor Body, I don't know

01:54:30 Speaker 22: where to begin. Clearly, there's people

01:54:34 Speaker 22: that are homeless. Clearly, there's people.

01:54:36 Speaker 22: that have mental health and drug

01:54:38 Speaker 22: addictions, and clearly they're coming from

01:54:40 Speaker 22: all over Grey County, mostly to

01:54:41 Speaker 22: One Sound and to Hanover, where

01:54:43 Speaker 22: they're most visible because we have

01:54:44 Speaker 22: the services that are here. I've

01:54:46 Speaker 22: said it in this circle before,

01:54:48 Speaker 22: but Grey County is kicking the

01:54:50 Speaker 22: living crap out of every other

01:54:53 Speaker 22: municipality in Ontario with these types

01:54:55 Speaker 22: of programmemes, yet. my telephone lights

01:54:57 Speaker 22: up at City Hall, telling me

01:54:59 Speaker 22: that we're not doing anything. I've

01:55:01 Speaker 22: got a ten thousand word essay

01:55:06 Speaker 22: that I send out to people,

01:55:07 Speaker 22: and of course I don't get

01:55:10 Speaker 22: a thanks for it after they

01:55:13 Speaker 22: just disappeared. The last phone call

01:55:14 Speaker 22: I got was a complaint about

01:55:16 Speaker 22: somebody homeless on an electric bicycle

01:55:18 Speaker 22: between Fenton and Park Street, which

01:55:21 Speaker 22: is in Georgetown blocks. They didn't

01:55:23 Speaker 22: leave a name, so I couldn't

01:55:26 Speaker 22: even tell them to phone Sue.

01:55:28 Speaker 22: I really wish. the Grey County

01:55:29 Speaker 22: would start blasting communications out and

01:55:31 Speaker 22: how well we're doing, and all

01:55:33 Speaker 22: the things that are going on.

01:55:36 Speaker 22: We've said this before, but we're

01:55:38 Speaker 22: not taking credit for our achievements.

01:55:40 Speaker 22: People in On Sound don't stick

01:55:44 Speaker 22: their head above the top of

01:55:46 Speaker 22: the hill to see which way

01:55:48 Speaker 22: the wind's blowing half the time,

01:55:50 Speaker 22: and they don't go to Ottawa,

01:55:52 Speaker 22: they don't go to Berry, they

01:55:58 Speaker 22: don't go to Sudbury, they don't

01:56:00 Speaker 22: go to Guelph, they don't go

01:56:01 Speaker 22: to London, they don't go to

01:56:03 Speaker 22: these other places. And we're doing

01:56:05 Speaker 22: extremely well in this community. We

01:56:07 Speaker 10: have very few people, frankly, per

01:56:09 Speaker 10: capita, that have problems on the

01:56:10 Speaker 10: street. Yes, they're there. I grew

01:56:11 Speaker 10: up in a family that had

01:56:15 Speaker 10: a men's clothing store in Main

01:56:16 Speaker 10: Street that started six years before

01:56:19 Speaker 10: I was born, and we closed

01:56:21 Speaker 10: it down about one year before

01:56:24 Speaker 10: I started practicing law in downtown

01:56:26 Speaker 10: Oceansound. So pretty well, my

01:56:28 Speaker 10: entire life, I've been in business

01:56:31 Speaker 10: in downtown Oceansound. I remember

01:56:33 Speaker 10: alcoholics that were on the street.

01:56:35 Speaker 10: I was talking to Louis Guevara

01:56:37 Speaker 10: the other day. We're naming them.

01:56:38 Speaker 10: There has always been people on

01:56:40 Speaker 10: the street. One Frankie that used

01:56:42 Speaker 10: to put a window through a

01:56:43 Speaker 10: Briggs Briggs jewelry store. No, the

01:56:45 Speaker 10: other one, someone else's jewelry store.

01:56:47 Speaker 10: Every November when it got cold,

01:56:48 Speaker 10: so he'd get sentenced until the

01:56:52 Speaker 10: spring, and then be back out.

01:56:54 Speaker 10: We're doing extremely well. We're

01:56:57 Speaker 10: never going to eradicate homelessness, mental

01:56:58 Speaker 10: health, or addictions. It is worse

01:57:00 Speaker 44: since COVID. We're doing. extremely well

01:57:02 Speaker 44: in Gray County, and we need

01:57:04 Speaker 44: to take credit for that. And

01:57:07 Speaker 44: we need to start communicating that

01:57:08 Speaker 44: more so that people understand all

01:57:10 Speaker 44: the programmemes that are going into

01:57:12 Speaker 44: this, and this one being another

01:57:14 Speaker 44: trial that hopefully works. People will

01:57:17 Speaker 44: find that little thing that isn't

01:57:19 Speaker 44: working perfectly and criticize it, but

01:57:21 Speaker 44: overall, we're doing extremely well,

01:57:25 Speaker 44: and I think we need

01:57:27 Speaker 44: to toot the horn.

01:57:29 Speaker 44: Thanks. Thank you very much, and

01:57:32 Speaker 44: with that, I don't see any

01:57:36 Speaker 44: further hands up for discussion, so

01:57:38 Speaker 44: I'm going to call call this

01:57:40 Speaker 44: question. All those in favour, and

01:57:44 Speaker 44: that motion is carried. Thank you

01:57:46 Speaker 44: very much, Director McNabb. So, what

01:57:49 Speaker 44: I would like to do is

01:57:50 Speaker 44: I would like to introduce the

01:57:54 Speaker 44: next item, and Madam Clerk will

01:57:57 Speaker 44: have the honourary position of just

01:57:59 Speaker 44: before lunch. Director Taylor will have

01:58:02 Speaker 44: to share on this day. So,

01:58:04 Speaker 44: it is recommended that Gray County,

7.c Grey County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee minutes dated September 18, 2025

Council adopted the Gray County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee minutes dated September 18, 2025, which endorsed a biennial accessibility compliance report covering employment and transportation standards. The committee reviewed reconstruction plans for Gray Road 12 in Markdale to install drop curbs and rest areas between Wellington Ave and Terra Drive. Staff also presented a renovation project at Gray Gables ensuring accessible vestibules, door widths, and washroom features. Finally, the group endorsed a new multi-year accessibility plan addressing policies, customer service, and public procurement standards.

01:58:06 Speaker 44: that the Gray County Joint Accessibility

01:58:08 Speaker 44: Advisory Committee meeting minutes dated September

01:58:11 Speaker 44: 18, 2025, be adopted as presented,

01:58:13 Speaker 44: and the following resolutions contained therein

01:58:14 Speaker 44: be endorsed. There are six items

01:58:16 Speaker 44: that are there that have been

01:58:18 Speaker 44: published, and the minutes have been

01:58:19 Speaker 44: circulated duly and are printed here

01:58:24 Speaker 44: on the agenda. So, with that,

01:58:27 Speaker 44: I will ask for a mover

01:58:30 Speaker 44: and a seconder. Moved by Councillor

01:58:31 Speaker 44: Gregg, seconded by Councillor Dobreen. It's

01:58:34 Speaker 44: now on the floor for discussion,

01:58:35 Speaker 44: Madam Clerk. Thank you, and good

01:58:39 Speaker 44: morning, County Council. The Gray County

01:58:41 Speaker 44: Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee met on

01:58:43 Speaker 44: September 18th to discuss a number

01:58:47 Speaker 44: of items. The first one up

01:58:49 Speaker 44: was a report from Gray County

01:58:51 Speaker 44: on the accessibility compliance report, which

01:58:53 Speaker 44: has been submitted to or will

01:58:55 Speaker 44: be submitted to the Ministry of

01:58:59 Speaker 44: Seniors and Accessibility. It's a requiredment

01:59:01 Speaker 44: to be submitted every two years,

01:59:02 Speaker 44: and it's a self-assessment exercise that

01:59:04 Speaker 44: Gray County will undertake to look

01:59:07 Speaker 44: at its status of compliance with

01:59:11 Speaker 44: the. Status of compliance with accessibility

01:59:14 Speaker 44: requirements. The assessment asked questions around

01:59:16 Speaker 44: compliance with employment standards, transportation standards,

01:59:19 Speaker 44: information and communication standards, design of

01:59:21 Speaker 44: public spaces, and customer service.

01:59:25 Speaker 44: The second report was another report

01:59:27 Speaker 44: from Gray County regarding the reconstruction

01:59:30 Speaker 44: of Gray Road 12 in Markdale,

01:59:34 Speaker 44: and the report was seeking the

01:59:35 Speaker 44: feedback from the committee on pedestrian

01:59:39 Speaker 44: facilities and rest areas. along

01:59:41 Speaker 44: this portion of the road between

01:59:43 Speaker 44: Wellington Ave and Terra Drive. Staff

01:59:46 Speaker 44: noted there will be drop curbs

01:59:47 Speaker 44: and tactile plates at the crossings.

01:59:51 Speaker 44: There were questions addressed regarding the

01:59:53 Speaker 44: elevation of the retaining wall and

01:59:55 Speaker 26: nearby surroundings in order to determine

01:59:58 Speaker 26: the need for rest areas along

02:00:00 Speaker 26: that portion. And discussion about whether

02:00:02 Speaker 26: there should be one in front

02:00:03 Speaker 26: of the church or the trail

02:00:05 Speaker 26: parking lot. But overall, I think

02:00:08 Speaker 26: there was general consensus. that there

02:00:11 Speaker 26: should be a rest area along

02:00:13 Speaker 26: that section. The next report was

02:00:16 Speaker 26: from long-term care for the renovation

02:00:18 Speaker 26: taking place at Gray Gables in

02:00:21 Speaker 26: the Kids and Us space. They

02:00:23 Speaker 26: are Kids and Us is undertaking

02:00:24 Speaker 26: the renovation in the building, and

02:00:26 Speaker 26: the project was brought brought forward

02:00:28 Speaker 26: for review and comment. So there

02:00:30 Speaker 26: has been consideration given to sufficient

02:00:32 Speaker 26: turning radius in the vestibule.

02:00:34 Speaker 26: appropriate door sizes and widths, and

02:00:38 Speaker 26: minimizations of obstructions, and the design

02:00:42 Speaker 26: of an accessible washroom, and then

02:00:43 Speaker 26: new lighting being incorporated in as

02:00:45 Speaker 26: well. There were also comments shared

02:00:47 Speaker 10: on the importance of accessibility of

02:00:48 Speaker 10: the components within the washroom, in

02:00:52 Speaker 10: addition to just the general design

02:00:55 Speaker 10: of the washroom itself. The next

02:00:55 Speaker 10: item was the Westray Multi-Year Accessibility

02:00:59 Speaker 10: Plan. It is a brand new

02:01:05 Speaker 10: plan. as the past one has

02:01:06 Speaker 10: just expired, I believe, last

02:01:08 Speaker 10: year. And it considered review of

02:01:12 Speaker 10: policies, customer service, and accessibility, procurement.

02:01:14 Speaker 10: The staff and attendants spoke to

02:01:17 Speaker 10: the accessible features appearing on the

02:01:19 Speaker 10: website, and also noting their wish

02:01:21 Speaker 10: to hear from the public on

02:01:23 Speaker 10: any opportunities to hear to hear

02:01:25 Speaker 10: opportunities to improve accessibility standards in

02:01:26 Speaker 10: the municipality. And that was. the

02:01:27 Speaker 10: summary of that meeting. Happy to

02:01:29 Speaker 10: take any questions if there are

02:01:33 Speaker 10: any. Okay, thank you. Any questions

02:01:35 Speaker 10: regarding these minutes? We'll go to

02:01:37 Speaker 10: Councillor Greg. And just a comment,

02:01:40 Speaker 10: but the Gray Road Twelve project

02:01:45 Speaker 10: is a good example. This is

02:01:47 Speaker 38: a really good committee that did

02:01:50 Speaker 38: a really good job of finding

02:01:51 Speaker 38: the sweet spot in terms of

02:01:55 Speaker 38: the rest area discussion and trying

02:01:57 Speaker 38: to position the project to suit

02:02:01 Speaker 38: the. needs now and in the

02:02:04 Speaker 38: future, but avoiding the overbuilt aspect

02:02:07 Speaker 38: because you can overbuild and you

02:02:09 Speaker 38: can underbuild. But certainly, just my

02:02:12 Speaker 38: compliments to the committee at finding

02:02:15 Speaker 38: that what I think is really

02:02:16 Speaker 38: just the right sweet spot and

02:02:18 Speaker 38: that balance. So they had really

02:02:20 Speaker 38: good discussion and and just good

02:02:22 Speaker 38: to see all the various considerations

02:02:24 Speaker 38: in the recommendation. Thanks, chair. Okay.

02:02:28 Speaker 38: Thank you. Any other questions, comments?

02:02:29 Speaker 38: Okay, not seen any then. I'll

02:02:34 Speaker 38: call the question. All those in

02:02:37 Speaker 38: favour. That motion is carried. Thank

02:02:40 Speaker 38: you. Okay, so that brings us

02:02:46 Speaker 38: just up to noon then. So

02:02:48 Speaker 38: if we could. Okay. Well, I've

02:02:52 Speaker 38: just received word that we can

02:02:54 Speaker 38: go a little bit longer. We

02:02:57 Speaker 38: have one that will be item

7.d Budget and Finance Committee minutes dated September 24, 2025

The Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on September 24th concluded the adoption of minutes containing resolutions regarding capital presentations from Long Term Care and staffing requests for 2026 and 2027. Director Cornell presented a capital budget programme relying on building condition assessments, while Paul Mcqueen explained the utilization of provincial funding for comprehensive minor capital repairs to offset reserve costs. The committee reviewed draft budget timelines with the CAO, scheduled high-level capital project discussions for October 29th, and approved a motion carried by Councillor Carleton before breaking for lunch.

02:02:58 Speaker 38: seven D. Then. It's recommended that

02:03:00 Speaker 38: the Budget and Finance Committee meeting

02:03:02 Speaker 38: minutes dated. September 24, 2025, be

02:03:04 Speaker 38: adopted as presented, and the following

02:03:06 Speaker 38: resolutions be contained contained therein, be

02:03:07 Speaker 38: endorsed. I will not read out

02:03:11 Speaker 38: the eight items because they have

02:03:15 Speaker 38: been circulated, and they have been

02:03:17 Speaker 38: circulated both in the minutes and

02:03:21 Speaker 38: on the agenda. But I will

02:03:23 Speaker 38: look for a mover and a

02:03:26 Speaker 38: seconder so that we can begin

02:03:28 Speaker 38: discussion. Moved by Councillor Carleton, seconded

02:03:32 Speaker 38: seconded by Councillor Kevney, and it's

02:03:33 Speaker 08: on the floor for discussion. Welcome

02:03:35 Speaker 08: back to the lectern. Welcome back

02:03:36 Speaker 08: to the Lecter and Director Spicer.

02:03:40 Speaker 08: Thank you, Madam Warden. The Budget

02:03:42 Speaker 08: and Finance Committee met on September

02:03:42 Speaker 08: 24th. We had a number of

02:03:44 Speaker 08: things on the agenda. The first

02:03:47 Speaker 08: was a capital presentation by Long

02:03:49 Speaker 08: Term Care, and Director Cornell presented,

02:03:52 Speaker 08: and this was the final presentation

02:03:53 Speaker 08: from the the departments with significant

02:03:55 Speaker 08: capital budgets. She spoke about that

02:03:57 Speaker 08: they rely heavily on their building

02:03:59 Speaker 08: condition assessment reports to develop their

02:04:01 Speaker 08: capital budget programme, and highlighted that

02:04:03 Speaker 08: there is a source of funding

02:04:15 Speaker 05: from the province for comprehensive minor

02:04:17 Speaker 01: capital. It helps with minor repairs

02:04:19 Speaker 01: and upkeep of the home, and

02:04:21 Speaker 01: we've been utilising that fund to

02:04:24 Speaker 01: offset some of the costs for

02:04:26 Speaker 01: planned work that normally would come

02:04:29 Speaker 01: from their respective reserves. We then

02:04:31 Speaker 01: talked about. the 2026 and 2027

02:04:33 Speaker 01: budget assumptions and timelines report, and

02:04:34 Speaker 01: talked about the timeline where departments

02:04:36 Speaker 01: finance and are reviewing draft budgets

02:04:37 Speaker 01: with the CAO and Deputy CAO.

02:04:39 Speaker 01: That's ongoing and finishes up next

02:04:41 Speaker 01: Wednesday. We talked about at the

02:04:42 Speaker 01: October 29th Budget and Finance Committee.

02:04:45 Speaker 01: There'll be a high-level overview and

02:52:15 Speaker 45: to discuss capital projects, and then

02:52:16 Speaker 01: to the review. of the draft

02:52:18 Speaker 01: budget, November twenty sixth, in advance

02:52:20 Speaker 01: of committee of the whole meetings,

02:52:22 Speaker 01: December fifth and twelfth. Then we

02:52:24 Speaker 01: followed up with Deputy CAO, provided

02:52:26 Speaker 01: a report on twenty twenty sixth

02:52:29 Speaker 01: and twenty twenty seven staffing requests,

02:52:32 Speaker 01: and there were a number of

02:52:33 Speaker 01: requests put forward. They were discussed,

02:52:35 Speaker 01: and they are summarised in the

02:52:37 Speaker 01: motion. Happy to take any questions

02:52:38 Speaker 01: if you have any. Okay, thank

02:52:40 Speaker 01: you for that introduction. Then, and

02:52:43 Speaker 01: with that, we will put it

02:52:44 Speaker 01: out on the floor for questions

02:52:47 Speaker 01: and comments. This, of course, is

02:53:07 Speaker 01: just the preamble that will lead

02:53:08 Speaker 01: us up to our greater discussion

02:53:12 Speaker 46: days when we get to the

02:53:13 Speaker 46: actual draft budget. Not seeing any

02:53:14 Speaker 46: hands go up nor online, I

02:53:15 Speaker 46: think you've answered any questions that

02:53:16 Speaker 46: may be there with the material

02:53:19 Speaker 46: that was presented through the minutes.

02:53:23 Speaker 46: I'll call the question. Then, all

02:53:24 Speaker 46: those in favour, and that motion

02:53:26 Speaker 46: is carried. Thank you. I'll just

02:53:29 Speaker 46: look for the moment to the

02:53:32 Speaker 47: clerks. Okay, so I have received

02:53:33 Speaker 47: word that lunch has arrived. It

02:53:35 Speaker 47: is a hot lunch. We do

02:53:37 Speaker 47: have two more items to discuss.

02:53:39 Speaker 47: That includes the one item that's

02:53:41 Speaker 47: in closed session. So I'm looking.

02:53:43 Speaker 47: for consensus that we break for

02:53:45 Speaker 47: lunch at this point in time.

02:53:46 Speaker 47: Yes, I'm seeing that. Thank you.

02:53:50 Speaker 47: Okay, so we're going to break

02:53:52 Speaker 47: for lunch at this time. Then

02:53:54 Speaker 47: we will come back to item

02:53:55 Speaker 47: 7e and then go into closed

02:53:57 Speaker 47: session. And let's break until if

02:54:00 Speaker 47: we could come back at quarter

02:54:03 Speaker 47: two at 12:45, please. Thank you.

02:54:06 Speaker 47: very much. So we are back

02:54:09 Speaker 47: from our break, and we are

02:54:11 Speaker 47: moving on with item seven E.

7.e Joint Municipal Services Committee minutes dated September 26, 2025

The Joint Municipal Services Committee reviewed minutes from September 26, 2025, and endorsed resolutions regarding waste management, staffing, and healthcare recruitment. The committee proposes a regional waste management strategy to explore efficiency gains amidst shifting market dynamics, requesting $250,000 for consultant engagement in the 2026 budget. Additionally, the group aims to formalize existing informal HR collaboration to develop joint training programmes across municipalities. Regarding physician recruitment, the county intends to clarify its supportive role with local health organisations without disrupting current multi-stakeholder efforts. Council members discussed the urgent need for regional waste management planning to address impending landfill capacity shortages and rising costs across nine municipalities. Speakers emphasized that individual contracts are unsustainable as supply declines, urging the group to unite for a joint study rather than fighting separate battles. The discussion highlighted models where organics are converted to energy in Southgate, suggesting efficiency gains from county-wide contracts even if some waste leaves the local municipality. Councillors noted that a preferred landfill site identified in a 1998 study could prevent future conflicts over tipping fees and space allocation.

02:54:14 Speaker 47: It's recommended that the Joint Municipal

02:54:16 Speaker 47: Services Committee meeting minutes, dated September

02:54:18 Speaker 47: twenty six, twenty twenty five, be

02:54:20 Speaker 47: adopted as presented. and the following

02:54:22 Speaker 47: resolutions contain contain therein be endorsed.

02:54:23 Speaker 47: There are seven of them listed

02:54:25 Speaker 47: that have been published and circulated

02:54:27 Speaker 47: both in the minutes and on

02:54:30 Speaker 47: the agenda. So I will look

02:54:32 Speaker 47: for a mover and a seconder.

02:54:33 Speaker 47: Moved by Councillor Eccles, seconded by

02:54:35 Speaker 47: Councillor Pringle. So it's now on

02:54:37 Speaker 47: the floor for discussion. And welcome

02:54:39 Speaker 47: to the lectern this afternoon, Deputy

02:54:42 Speaker 47: Cao. Oh, I don't know whether

02:54:44 Speaker 47: speaking before lunch or after lunch

02:54:47 Speaker 47: is worse. There's a big green

02:54:48 Speaker 47: sticker that tells me which button

02:54:50 Speaker 47: to press, and apparently I didn't

02:54:51 Speaker 47: clue onto that. Was pressing the

02:54:52 Speaker 47: wrong one, but there we go.

02:54:54 Speaker 47: Good afternoon, and through you, through

02:54:57 Speaker 47: you, Warden. Thank you very much.

02:54:58 Speaker 47: I'm going to give a very

02:55:00 Speaker 47: quick update of the the last

02:55:02 Speaker 47: Joint Municipal Services Committee meeting. We

02:55:05 Speaker 47: met and discussed the priorities that

02:55:08 Speaker 47: had been ranked by the committee

02:55:11 Speaker 47: through its first meeting, and talked

02:55:14 Speaker 47: about next steps that we we've

02:55:16 Speaker 47: we've managed to sort of plot

02:55:18 Speaker 47: out for a course of action

02:55:19 Speaker 47: on those areas. So I'll go

02:55:21 Speaker 47: quickly through them. The first one

02:55:22 Speaker 47: was waste management, which is a

02:55:25 Speaker 47: a service which is delivered by

02:55:27 Speaker 47: member municipalities and has been. a

02:55:31 Speaker 47: subject of conversation around this horseshoe

02:55:32 Speaker 47: a number of times over the

02:55:34 Speaker 47: years. And through the Joint Municipal

02:55:36 Speaker 47: Services Committee, there was interest expressed

02:55:37 Speaker 47: in looking at considering closer ways

02:55:39 Speaker 47: of working across the county, with

02:55:42 Speaker 47: with the potential ultimately that that

02:55:43 Speaker 47: services could be partially or fully

02:55:45 Speaker 47: altered in their service delivery mechanism

02:55:47 Speaker 47: to potentially a county a county

02:55:50 Speaker 47: led a county led model. So

02:55:52 Speaker 47: there has been a very successful

02:55:55 Speaker 47: community of practice meeting. over the

02:55:56 Speaker 47: last two years, a year and

02:55:58 Speaker 47: a half, discussing the ways in

02:56:00 Speaker 47: which we deliver services, the similarities

02:56:01 Speaker 47: that exist between municipalities, and the

02:56:03 Speaker 47: differences that we currently have across

02:56:07 Speaker 47: the landscape of waste management and

02:56:10 Speaker 47: waste collection services in the county.

02:56:12 Speaker 47: So we have a fairly

02:56:14 Speaker 47: good understanding of what's what's happening

02:56:16 Speaker 47: out there. The next step in

02:56:19 Speaker 47: that process, we believe, and we're

02:56:22 Speaker 47: recommending, is to undertake a regional

02:56:24 Speaker 47: waste management strategy. It would look

02:56:26 Speaker 47: at all the services that are

02:56:28 Speaker 47: currently being provided and how they're

02:56:30 Speaker 47: being provided. It would look at

02:56:32 Speaker 47: the ways in which those services

02:56:35 Speaker 47: are being provided in other

02:56:38 Speaker 47: communities and different models that have

02:56:40 Speaker 47: been applied in those communities, and

02:56:42 Speaker 47: different ways in which those services

02:56:43 Speaker 47: could be delivered in the future,

02:56:44 Speaker 47: which may realise efficiencies, cost savings,

02:56:47 Speaker 47: and service level enhancements to community

02:56:49 Speaker 47: groups. And so, coming from

02:56:51 Speaker 47: that meeting, if endorsed by council

02:56:53 Speaker 47: to committee today and council in

02:56:54 Speaker 47: a couple of weeks' time. there

02:56:57 Speaker 47: would be a budget request. You

02:56:58 Speaker 47: would see in front of you

02:57:02 Speaker 47: as part of the 2026 budget

02:57:04 Speaker 47: to put 250,000 dollars to one

02:57:06 Speaker 47: side to engage a consultant to

02:57:09 Speaker 47: undertake that regional waste review. The

02:57:11 Speaker 47: second of the areas we spent

02:57:13 Speaker 47: some time talking about was staffing

02:57:14 Speaker 47: and HR services. We talked a

02:57:18 Speaker 47: lot as a committee about the

02:57:18 Speaker 47: similarities that exist between the member

02:57:20 Speaker 47: municipalities and the county across Grey,

02:57:22 Speaker 47: and some of the ways in

02:57:24 Speaker 47: which we we could look at

02:57:26 Speaker 47: ways of closer. alignment. Again, there

02:57:27 Speaker 47: is a an effective working group

02:57:29 Speaker 47: of HR managers and HR professionals

02:57:30 Speaker 47: that already collabourate informally across the

02:57:31 Speaker 47: county, and so really, what we're

02:57:32 Speaker 47: recommending at this point is formalising

02:57:35 Speaker 47: that process a little bit more

02:57:37 Speaker 47: and taking first steps towards looking

02:57:39 Speaker 47: at how we could deliver a

02:57:41 Speaker 47: joint training programme, more joined up

02:57:43 Speaker 47: delivery of training. Our staff in

02:57:45 Speaker 47: both Gray County and across member

02:57:47 Speaker 47: municipalities are undertaking very similar training.

02:57:50 Speaker 47: Taking very similar trainings in areas

02:57:51 Speaker 47: such as operations, in health and

02:57:53 Speaker 47: safety, in HR, and so there

02:57:55 Speaker 47: are some there are some

02:57:57 Speaker 47: easy wins in terms of aligning

02:57:59 Speaker 47: and closer alignment of those training

02:58:01 Speaker 47: courses. We also talked about some

02:58:03 Speaker 47: of the that would have been

02:58:04 Speaker 47: termed softer skills around finding efficiency,

02:58:06 Speaker 47: so lean type training, project management

02:58:07 Speaker 47: training, change management training, and how

02:58:09 Speaker 47: they could be delivered in a

02:58:11 Speaker 47: different way. And so we're going

02:58:13 Speaker 47: to take first. steps. We're advising

02:58:13 Speaker 47: that we take first steps towards

02:58:16 Speaker 47: a collective, collective approach to training,

02:58:19 Speaker 47: a more collective approach and collabourative

02:58:21 Speaker 47: approach to training in future years.

02:58:23 Speaker 47: It's fair to say that that

02:58:24 Speaker 47: conversation went a lot further than

02:58:26 Speaker 47: training. We explored all kinds of

02:58:28 Speaker 47: different areas where human resource services,

02:58:30 Speaker 47: training services, and other other areas

02:58:32 Speaker 47: around the staffing, retention, and recruitment

02:58:32 Speaker 47: side could be further, further merged

02:58:35 Speaker 47: or further shared between municipalities. But

02:58:37 Speaker 47: we felt that. this would be

02:58:39 Speaker 47: the first first good step coming

02:58:40 Speaker 47: out from that committee discussion. The

02:58:44 Speaker 47: last area, and I know this

02:58:45 Speaker 47: is an area close to close

02:58:46 Speaker 47: to many of your hearts, was

02:58:50 Speaker 47: around healthcare and physician recruitment, which

02:58:52 Speaker 47: was which was a topic that

02:58:53 Speaker 47: had been raised at the first

02:58:57 Speaker 47: one and given some degree of

02:59:00 Speaker 47: prioritisation. We've not been able to

02:59:02 Speaker 47: do a great deal in terms

02:59:04 Speaker 48: of what that would look like

02:59:09 Speaker 48: in respect of future actions between

02:59:12 Speaker 48: the first municipal service committee and

02:59:13 Speaker 48: the second one. What we have

02:59:16 Speaker 48: managed to do is meet with

02:59:18 Speaker 47: the OHT locally, Great Brook OHT,

02:59:19 Speaker 47: have a conversation with them in

02:59:21 Speaker 47: regards to their work and and

02:59:22 Speaker 47: what that looks like locally, and

02:59:25 Speaker 47: to start to build a build

02:59:26 Speaker 47: an understanding of whether the great

02:59:27 Speaker 47: whether Great County could add value

02:59:29 Speaker 47: in support of the conversations around

02:59:30 Speaker 47: healthcare and physician recruitment. We understand

02:59:32 Speaker 47: that that's a field where there's

02:59:34 Speaker 47: many many hands already involved, and

02:59:35 Speaker 47: so the first step we wanted

02:59:39 Speaker 47: to make sure of is that

02:59:42 Speaker 47: we wouldn't further muddy waters, and

02:59:46 Speaker 47: in fact could be a clarifying.

02:59:48 Speaker 47: That could be a clarifying influence

02:59:51 Speaker 47: rather than a muddying influence, and

02:59:54 Speaker 47: and by all partners, it would

02:59:55 Speaker 26: appear there is a role that

02:59:59 Speaker 26: the county could could play. And

03:00:01 Speaker 26: so, again, with the the support

03:00:04 Speaker 26: and endorsement of of council, our

03:00:06 Speaker 26: work would be to now sit

03:00:07 Speaker 26: down further with people that

03:00:10 Speaker 26: have been involved, both from a

03:00:12 Speaker 26: municipal perspective in the past as

03:00:15 Speaker 26: well as OHT, to try and

03:00:17 Speaker 26: clarify what the grey county role

03:00:23 Speaker 26: would be. So, as with the

03:00:26 Speaker 26: first meeting, it was a great

03:00:29 Speaker 26: great collabourative discussion. Identified a lot

03:00:30 Speaker 26: of opportunities that we can explore.

03:00:33 Speaker 26: and and so I'm happy to

03:00:34 Speaker 26: take any questions that might follow

03:00:39 Speaker 26: on from that. Thank you very

03:00:41 Speaker 26: much for that introduction. So we'll

03:00:44 Speaker 26: put it out for County Council

03:00:46 Speaker 26: for comments and questions. We'll start

03:00:50 Speaker 26: with the Deputy Warden. Thank you,

03:00:52 Speaker 26: Madam Warden, and thank you now

03:00:56 Speaker 26: for the report. Are the items

03:01:01 Speaker 26: on here in order of priority,

03:01:04 Speaker 26: or are they simply there as

03:01:06 Speaker 26: the course of the meeting, the

03:01:09 Speaker 47: conversation took place? Please. So, through

03:01:10 Speaker 47: you, Madam Warden. Good question. I

03:01:11 Speaker 47: can't remember. Would be the answer.

03:01:14 Speaker 47: So we did a we did

03:01:15 Speaker 47: a prioritization exercise in the first

03:01:17 Speaker 47: meeting. Where we really left that

03:01:19 Speaker 47: was just identifying the top three.

03:01:22 Speaker 47: So we had, I think, there

03:01:24 Speaker 47: were eleven items on that list,

03:01:26 Speaker 47: and I think we're going to

03:01:27 Speaker 47: work on all eleven over time.

03:01:29 Speaker 47: So the other the other eight

03:01:31 Speaker 47: or so, if my math is

03:01:34 Speaker 47: serving me correctly, have not been

03:01:36 Speaker 47: forgotten about. But there's no particular

03:01:37 Speaker 47: order into. But there's no particular

03:01:40 Speaker 47: order in terms of the way

03:01:41 Speaker 47: in which we we put them

03:01:42 Speaker 47: into the report. Okay. Other questions,

03:01:44 Speaker 47: comments? We'll go to Councillor Craig.

03:01:47 Speaker 47: Two questions. I guess the first

03:01:48 Speaker 47: one's a very quick question. I

03:01:49 Speaker 47: was surprised to see be directed

03:01:51 Speaker 47: to collate a library, but I

03:01:53 Speaker 47: surprised to see of HR policies

03:01:55 Speaker 47: after the library. I just wonder:

03:01:56 Speaker 47: is library something that the committee

03:01:57 Speaker 47: has? gotten that plan of eleven

03:01:59 Speaker 47: items have they went there in

03:02:01 Speaker 47: any of the discussion is there

03:02:02 Speaker 47: future discussion forthcoming on it and

03:02:05 Speaker 47: the second question is a little

03:02:06 Speaker 47: bit more information on the regional

03:02:08 Speaker 47: waste management plan like I've heard

03:02:10 Speaker 47: some discuss the idea of working

03:02:12 Speaker 47: together to secure like one vendor

03:02:13 Speaker 47: but you have to be careful

03:02:15 Speaker 47: for what you wish for. because

03:02:16 Speaker 47: right now there's a couple players

03:02:20 Speaker 47: in the marketplace, and that's a

03:02:21 Speaker 47: good thing. If you were to

03:02:23 Speaker 47: advance towards one particular vendor for

03:02:25 Speaker 47: your whole area in ten years,

03:02:27 Speaker 47: you might come to to regret

03:02:28 Speaker 47: that decision. So I'm just wondering

03:02:29 Speaker 47: at this point, what type of

03:02:31 Speaker 47: outcomes is the committee envisioning? So

03:02:33 Speaker 47: through you, Madam Warden. To the

03:02:36 Speaker 47: first question, library has been discussed

03:02:38 Speaker 47: in the past. Library as a

03:02:40 Speaker 47: great county service is not one

03:02:41 Speaker 47: of the ones that came up

03:02:42 Speaker 47: on this list. So, so the

03:02:45 Speaker 47: use of the word library in

03:02:46 Speaker 47: this particular instance was specific to

03:02:48 Speaker 47: the HR policy realm of things,

03:02:49 Speaker 47: rather than a more generic approach.

03:02:50 Speaker 47: In in regards to waste management,

03:02:53 Speaker 47: I think I think the the

03:02:55 Speaker 47: concept here is it's far too

03:02:57 Speaker 47: early to say what that. could

03:02:58 Speaker 47: look like. So the the nature

03:03:03 Speaker 47: of the landscape has shifted significantly.

03:03:10 Speaker 49: If if you roll back one

03:03:13 Speaker 49: or two contracts ago, there was

03:03:18 Speaker 31: a great deal more diversity in

03:03:21 Speaker 31: that marketplace than there is today.

03:03:22 Speaker 31: And you're quite correct. There are

03:03:25 Speaker 31: there are two local players, and

03:03:28 Speaker 31: one local player has achieved significantly

03:03:32 Speaker 31: more footprint over the last few

03:03:36 Speaker 31: years due to some provincial changes

03:03:43 Speaker 31: than than the other one. So

03:03:45 Speaker 31: so we're already seeing that market

03:03:50 Speaker 31: shift quite significantly. And so I

03:03:53 Speaker 31: think part of the work of

03:03:57 Speaker 31: the regional waste management strategy. is

03:04:00 Speaker 31: to look to see how that

03:04:05 Speaker 31: we could we could use that

03:04:08 Speaker 31: changing landscape to our advantage. Are

03:04:10 Speaker 31: there advantages that we could explore?

03:04:12 Speaker 31: And it could well be that

03:04:13 Speaker 31: at the end of that, it's

03:04:16 Speaker 31: it's status quo or it is

03:04:19 Speaker 31: rolling up of some services. So,

03:04:22 Speaker 31: for example, if you go next

03:04:23 Speaker 31: door to Bruce County, they've rolled

03:04:28 Speaker 31: up household hazardous waste collection to

03:04:31 Speaker 31: a county level, but they've left

03:04:34 Speaker 31: curbside collection to to member municipal

03:04:37 Speaker 31: levels. So there's there's no one

03:04:39 Speaker 31: size fits all. And I think

03:04:43 Speaker 31: the the idea behind undertaking this

03:04:44 Speaker 31: next step, in terms of looking

03:04:45 Speaker 31: at a strategy, is to see

03:04:48 Speaker 31: where there are some opportunities. And

03:04:49 Speaker 31: so, you know, another example of

03:04:51 Speaker 31: that is we have varying different

03:04:54 Speaker 47: capacities across Grey County in terms

03:04:56 Speaker 47: of landfill. We have varying different

03:04:57 Speaker 47: capacities in terms of how we

03:04:59 Speaker 47: deal with organic waste. And so,

03:05:01 Speaker 47: I know that our colleagues in

03:05:03 Speaker 47: Southgate are processing their own organic

03:05:04 Speaker 47: waste on site. In fact, doing

03:05:06 Speaker 47: so in a way with capacity

03:05:07 Speaker 47: that could be shared. And so,

03:05:09 Speaker 47: are there there are are there

03:05:11 Speaker 47: some efficiencies we can find within?

03:05:13 Speaker 47: that aren't going to necessarily cost

03:05:14 Speaker 47: any of us anymore, and so

03:05:15 Speaker 47: I think that would be the

03:05:16 Speaker 47: next step. Okay, we'll go to

03:05:19 Speaker 47: Councillor Dobrin. I'll reserve that comment.

03:05:21 Speaker 47: I was thinking of something, but

03:05:23 Speaker 47: I won't do that. How did

03:05:25 Speaker 47: you arrive at a consulting fee

03:05:26 Speaker 47: of two hundred and fifty thousand?

03:05:27 Speaker 47: dollars, quarter of a million dollars

03:05:30 Speaker 47: to evaluate the potential for a

03:05:31 Speaker 47: regional waste management system. My gut

03:05:32 Speaker 47: reaction is that it's somewhat wasteful.

03:05:35 Speaker 47: Thank you, pun intended, and yeah.

03:05:35 Speaker 47: So that aspect of it, and

03:05:37 Speaker 47: yes, Southgate has a very forward-thinking

03:05:39 Speaker 47: waste. Thinking waste diversion programme for

03:05:41 Speaker 47: some twenty-three years, and the organics

03:05:42 Speaker 47: does have capacity. We are non-unionized,

03:05:44 Speaker 47: and having come from a city

03:05:46 Speaker 47: where they convert the waste management

03:05:48 Speaker 47: system to you know private sector,

03:05:49 Speaker 47: and one side of the highway

03:05:52 Speaker 47: gets waste pickup, and the other

03:05:54 Speaker 47: one's on strike. So I would

03:05:56 Speaker 47: have I have concerns about it.

03:05:57 Speaker 47: If I recall. this was looked

03:05:58 Speaker 47: at not too long ago, like

03:06:01 Speaker 47: not too many years ago, maybe

03:06:02 Speaker 47: before 2020. Would we not look

03:06:03 Speaker 47: at that study first and see

03:06:04 Speaker 47: what the results were, or why

03:06:05 Speaker 47: we didn't? It wasn't pursued at

03:06:07 Speaker 47: that time. Thank you. So I

03:06:08 Speaker 47: might rely on the the CAO

03:06:10 Speaker 47: to help me out on this

03:06:12 Speaker 47: one, but to get started through

03:06:14 Speaker 47: you, Madam Warden. So the the

03:06:23 Speaker 47: work that was done in 2020

03:06:25 Speaker 47: was initiated by a request from

03:06:28 Speaker 47: member municipalities to have a look

03:06:31 Speaker 31: at this, and indeed we did

03:06:36 Speaker 31: take some steps towards that, but

03:06:38 Speaker 31: we never actually completed the study.

03:06:39 Speaker 31: There was there were some funding

03:06:40 Speaker 31: challenges, and there was certainly a

03:06:41 Speaker 47: pressure of time back in 2020

03:06:43 Speaker 47: on getting this one done to

03:06:44 Speaker 47: the requirements of the study, so

03:06:46 Speaker 47: it didn't actually happen. So so

03:06:50 Speaker 47: we aren't repeating work that has

03:06:52 Speaker 47: been done. We're really coming back

03:06:54 Speaker 47: to work that had already been

03:06:56 Speaker 47: requested to be done that we

03:06:57 Speaker 47: haven't yet. managed to get to,

03:07:00 Speaker 47: so so there's that piece. To

03:07:02 Speaker 47: the to the the value of

03:07:03 Speaker 47: this work, we've we've taken

03:07:04 Speaker 47: that value base from some of

03:07:11 Speaker 47: that initial work that was done

03:07:17 Speaker 47: in 2020 to scope out what

03:07:21 Speaker 47: this could look like, and and

03:07:22 Speaker 13: obviously built a little bit of

03:07:24 Speaker 13: a buffer in because we are

03:07:24 Speaker 13: now four or five years after

03:07:26 Speaker 13: that. We've also looked at some

03:07:28 Speaker 13: of the work that's been done

03:07:30 Speaker 13: in neighbouring counties. So Simcoe's done

03:07:33 Speaker 13: similar work, and Bruce County's done

03:07:35 Speaker 13: similar work, and these are the

03:07:39 Speaker 13: sorts of values that they've been

03:07:42 Speaker 13: getting back in terms of the

03:07:44 Speaker 13: consultation. In terms of the consulting

03:07:46 Speaker 13: costs associated for doing a

03:07:47 Speaker 13: body of work, which is which

03:07:51 Speaker 13: is essentially looking at ten organisations

03:07:53 Speaker 13: and how they organise waste and

03:07:57 Speaker 13: manage waste, looking at the provincial

03:08:00 Speaker 13: landscape for that, and then trying

03:08:01 Speaker 13: to map out what would happen.

03:08:03 Speaker 13: So it's a fairly significant body

03:08:04 Speaker 13: of work, as always. And I

03:08:06 Speaker 13: know I'm going to I'm stood

03:08:07 Speaker 13: up here, and my colleagues will

03:08:10 Speaker 13: say the same thing. My hope

03:08:14 Speaker 13: would be is that as an

03:08:19 Speaker 13: upper limit, and not a limit

03:08:21 Speaker 13: that we're aiming to get to,

03:08:23 Speaker 13: but based on those the look

03:08:25 Speaker 13: on the landscape, that's roughly what

03:08:27 Speaker 13: these pieces of work. So should

03:08:28 Speaker 13: this be approved with an upset

03:08:30 Speaker 13: limit of two hundred fifty thousand,

03:08:31 Speaker 13: the RFP would go out, and

03:08:33 Speaker 13: we would still have an opportunity

03:08:35 Speaker 13: to, yay or nay, the decision

03:08:36 Speaker 13: to award the consulting tender. So

03:08:37 Speaker 13: through you, Madam Ward, and absolutely.

03:08:40 Speaker 13: So we're not actually looking for

03:08:43 Speaker 13: approval right now to even get

03:08:45 Speaker 13: started on this work. That would.

03:08:46 Speaker 13: be something which will come through

03:08:48 Speaker 13: the budget process. So, if this

03:08:49 Speaker 13: is approved through the budget process,

03:08:51 Speaker 13: the the the hope would be

03:08:53 Speaker 13: to write collectively an RFP scope

03:08:54 Speaker 13: of works that would be done

03:08:56 Speaker 13: through that community of practice, through

03:08:58 Speaker 13: the CAO group, and through the

03:09:00 Speaker 13: joint municipal services group. That would

03:09:02 Speaker 13: then go out to market to

03:09:07 Speaker 13: be bid on, and it would

03:09:09 Speaker 31: come back through the traditional procurement

03:09:12 Speaker 31: channels for councils approval. Just further

03:09:14 Speaker 31: to Deputy CEO Lobbly's comments, as

03:09:18 Speaker 31: as Niall indicated, the you know

03:09:19 Speaker 31: the the step today would be

03:09:22 Speaker 31: to include this as part of

03:09:27 Speaker 31: the budget, so that be part

03:09:28 Speaker 31: of the budget considerations. We are

03:09:31 Speaker 31: proposing to fund that from both

03:09:33 Speaker 42: a waste manager reserve and a

03:09:35 Speaker 42: one time funding reserve combination, in

03:09:36 Speaker 42: order to fund that project. As

03:09:39 Speaker 42: Niall correctly indicated, just past COVID.

03:09:43 Speaker 42: there was a motion that was

03:09:44 Speaker 42: put forward by a municipality that

03:09:47 Speaker 42: to look into this. At that

03:09:48 Speaker 42: time, there was provincial funding through

03:09:51 Speaker 42: the municipal modernization funding. There was

03:09:53 Speaker 42: tight timelines, and we asked for

03:09:55 Speaker 42: an extension to that timeline. And

03:09:57 Speaker 42: unfortunately, that extension was not provided,

03:10:01 Speaker 42: and therefore, we felt that given

03:10:05 Speaker 42: the comprehensiveness of this study and

03:10:07 Speaker 42: the length of time it likely

03:10:10 Speaker 42: will take, we just couldn't meet

03:10:15 Speaker 42: that timeline at that time. So,

03:10:16 Speaker 42: therefore, that's why. that project didn't

03:10:19 Speaker 42: proceed. Then, we have since then

03:10:22 Speaker 42: have had several meetings with waste

03:10:27 Speaker 42: management staff from the various municipalities.

03:10:30 Speaker 42: We call it the waste management

03:10:34 Speaker 42: practice. We've collected some data and

03:10:36 Speaker 42: information as part of those discussions.

03:10:41 Speaker 42: So we think we're at a

03:10:42 Speaker 42: good starting point. We'll of course

03:10:44 Speaker 42: include that information as part of

03:10:46 Speaker 42: the RFP document. And like Nala

03:10:51 Speaker 42: said, we're hoping this is an

03:10:52 Speaker 42: upper limit. We hope we've been

03:10:55 Speaker 42: able to collect some of that

03:10:59 Speaker 42: information to maybe help cut some

03:11:02 Speaker 42: of those costs, so to speak,

03:11:05 Speaker 42: initially because that would have been

03:11:06 Speaker 42: required anyways as part of that

03:11:09 Speaker 42: initial first step for that study.

03:11:12 Speaker 13: But we've already done some of

03:11:13 Speaker 13: that base work to help inform

03:11:15 Speaker 13: the study. So, so I think

03:11:17 Speaker 13: we're at a good starting point

03:11:20 Speaker 13: with it, and hopefully we'll get

03:11:21 Speaker 13: some costs. That 250 was what

03:11:23 Speaker 13: we proposed. What was the estimate

03:11:26 Speaker 13: back in 2021? We were

03:11:28 Speaker 13: considering this study back then. and

03:11:31 Speaker 13: you just reminded me of one

03:11:33 Speaker 13: more thing: is that with producer

03:11:35 Speaker 13: responsibility, the recycling component of that

03:11:38 Speaker 13: landscape may have changed for all

03:11:42 Speaker 13: of our municipalities, which kind of

03:11:44 Speaker 13: throws a wrinkle into the information

03:11:46 Speaker 13: that might have been collected five

03:11:47 Speaker 13: years ago. Okay, thank you. We're

03:11:49 Speaker 13: going to go to Councillor Eccles

03:11:50 Speaker 13: next. Two hundred and fifty thousand

03:11:52 Speaker 13: dollars. is that going to be

03:11:53 Speaker 13: the finding fee to find that

03:11:56 Speaker 13: study that was done in nineteen

03:11:57 Speaker 13: ninety four on waste management at

03:11:59 Speaker 13: a county level? How much? I

03:12:03 Speaker 13: mean, we've been down this path

03:12:05 Speaker 13: before, and I'm not going to

03:12:08 Speaker 13: dwell on it. But we've got

03:12:11 Speaker 13: studies upon studies on how the

03:12:14 Speaker 13: county can get into waste management,

03:12:17 Speaker 13: and now we're going to do

03:12:20 Speaker 13: another one or proposed. I mean,

03:12:22 Speaker 13: just this isn't. towards you, Deputy

03:12:25 Speaker 13: CEO. This is this is this

03:12:29 Speaker 13: committee letting us come forward. I'd

03:12:31 Speaker 13: have a hard time, a very

03:12:32 Speaker 13: hard time supporting us in budget.

03:12:33 Speaker 13: I'll just put that up front.

03:12:36 Speaker 13: That's all. And for anybody's 1994,

03:12:38 Speaker 13: there was a study done by

03:12:39 Speaker 13: the county on all how the

03:12:40 Speaker 13: county could. do waste management. I

03:12:42 Speaker 13: have seen it. It's sitting someplace

03:12:44 Speaker 13: in the vault, Randy. Was it

03:12:49 Speaker 13: a million? I thought it was

03:12:51 Speaker 13: a million two, but yeah, it

03:12:52 Speaker 49: was well over a million dollars

03:12:58 Speaker 49: that that study cost at that

03:13:05 Speaker 49: time. And it was fully funded

03:13:07 Speaker 20: by the province. So, anyways, just

03:13:09 Speaker 20: saying, it's there is one out

03:13:11 Speaker 20: there. The the CAO would like

03:13:14 Speaker 20: to respond. Thank you, through you,

03:13:16 Speaker 20: Warden, Councillor Ackles is correct. There

03:13:17 Speaker 20: was a study that was done

03:13:21 Speaker 20: in early nineties, for sure. And

03:13:25 Speaker 20: in terms of looking at waste

03:13:27 Speaker 20: management, I think at that time

03:13:30 Speaker 20: it was scoped in terms of

03:13:32 Speaker 20: looking at potential expansion of an

03:13:34 Speaker 20: existing landfill at that time, and

03:13:36 Speaker 20: whether or not that could serve

03:13:38 Speaker 20: a wider area in terms of

03:13:40 Speaker 20: landfill capacity, as Nile indicated. the

03:13:41 Speaker 20: landscape has significantly changed on the

03:13:45 Speaker 20: wayside. As Councillor Debrine just indicated,

03:13:46 Speaker 20: the recycling aspects have significant changing

03:13:48 Speaker 20: or continuing to change, even month

03:13:50 Speaker 20: to month it seems. So, so

03:13:54 Speaker 20: we think that although there was

03:13:56 Speaker 20: a previous study that was completed,

03:13:58 Speaker 20: and again some of that will

03:14:00 Speaker 20: help inform some background information that

03:14:03 Speaker 20: we can provide to the consultant

03:14:05 Speaker 20: to hopefully keep the cost down

03:14:06 Speaker 20: as low as we can. But

03:14:09 Speaker 20: we think there's merit to exploring

03:14:11 Speaker 20: this. based on some of the

03:14:17 Speaker 20: conversations again that we've had collectively

03:14:19 Speaker 20: through that community practice, and and

03:14:21 Speaker 20: to at least see if there's

03:14:27 Speaker 20: opportunities and whether or not it's

03:14:32 Speaker 20: across a wide spectrum of just

03:14:34 Speaker 20: working together on promotional materials and

03:14:36 Speaker 50: helping to to educate and and

03:14:37 Speaker 50: and be aware of all the

03:14:39 Speaker 50: changing changes that are occurring and

03:14:41 Speaker 50: sharing some of those those communications

03:14:44 Speaker 50: and services. rate through rate to

03:14:45 Speaker 50: potentially the county, then assuming waste

03:14:48 Speaker 50: management and lots of stuff in

03:14:51 Speaker 50: between there. So we think there's

03:14:53 Speaker 50: a number of options that can

03:14:59 Speaker 50: be explored. Obviously, doing that cost

03:15:04 Speaker 50: benefit analysis to see what makes

03:15:07 Speaker 50: the most sense or what might

03:15:09 Speaker 50: make the most sense, and then

03:15:12 Speaker 22: of course bringing that back to

03:15:15 Speaker 22: council and the respective member municipal

03:15:16 Speaker 22: councils for consideration. Okay, thank you.

03:15:17 Speaker 22: I'll look around the room. We'll

03:15:19 Speaker 22: go to Councillor Kent. We'll go

03:15:21 Speaker 22: to Councillor Kentner next. Right. Thank

03:15:25 Speaker 22: you, and through you, Gordon Matrasovs.

03:15:28 Speaker 22: I think that all of our,

03:15:29 Speaker 22: all of us in the first

03:15:34 Speaker 22: tiers, are going through a process

03:15:38 Speaker 22: right now where we are trying

03:15:42 Speaker 22: to get to our first budget

03:15:43 Speaker 22: meeting without having to start at

03:15:47 Speaker 22: six or seven percent because of

03:15:49 Speaker 22: pre-approval. Because of preapprovals, and to

03:15:51 Speaker 22: me, this the waste management problem

03:15:52 Speaker 22: sounds a lot like the housing

03:15:54 Speaker 22: problem. Is there a jurisdiction anywhere

03:15:56 Speaker 22: that has solved it, on either

03:15:59 Speaker 22: side of the border, for that

03:16:03 Speaker 22: matter? Like, I think we should

03:16:04 Speaker 22: really think hard about this

03:16:08 Speaker 22: quarter million because every four times

03:16:09 Speaker 22: you spend it, you're down a

03:16:11 Speaker 22: million. I just, I just, I

03:16:12 Speaker 22: know where those of us who

03:16:14 Speaker 22: are speaking this way are treading

03:16:16 Speaker 22: where angels fear. to, but honestly,

03:16:17 Speaker 22: I think we have we can

03:16:19 Speaker 22: gather on our own all the

03:16:22 Speaker 22: information we need to know how

03:16:24 Speaker 22: we can deal with with it

03:16:27 Speaker 22: more effectively in Gray County, and

03:16:28 Speaker 22: then we can talk to Bruce

03:16:30 Speaker 22: County and Simcoe County and Dufferin

03:16:31 Speaker 22: County and Wellington County. Is there

03:16:32 Speaker 22: a firm out there that we

03:16:33 Speaker 22: know actually specializes in presenting a

03:16:34 Speaker 22: plan that will? be so much

03:16:36 Speaker 22: more effective than what we're doing

03:16:37 Speaker 22: now. Those are my points. Thanks.

03:16:40 Speaker 22: Okay. Thank you. Do Do you

03:16:41 Speaker 22: want? Okay. Just to the latter

03:16:43 Speaker 22: question, in terms of whether or

03:16:45 Speaker 22: not there's there's firms that specialize

03:16:46 Speaker 22: in this area, yes, there's several

03:16:49 Speaker 22: firms that that we're aware of

03:16:51 Speaker 22: that have, again, other neighbouring counties

03:16:54 Speaker 22: have have utilised in the past

03:16:55 Speaker 22: to do a similar study. so

03:16:56 Speaker 22: we know that there's there's there's

03:16:58 Speaker 22: firms out there that specialize in

03:17:00 Speaker 22: this area, and yeah, and so

03:17:01 Speaker 22: just leave it there. Okay, we'll

03:17:03 Speaker 22: go to Councillor Body. Just to

03:17:05 Speaker 22: respond to some of the concerns,

03:17:07 Speaker 22: changes are coming pretty quickly in

03:17:08 Speaker 22: this in this area. I know

03:17:13 Speaker 22: Meaford got a contract recently. for

03:17:17 Speaker 22: garbage removal a couple of years

03:17:18 Speaker 22: ago, but they got whacked, and

03:17:19 Speaker 22: at that point they're saying we

03:17:23 Speaker 22: need help. We need to think

03:17:24 Speaker 07: think bigger. Blue Box has changed

03:17:27 Speaker 07: since 1994. I don't know. There's

03:17:29 Speaker 07: probably people around the table that

03:17:30 Speaker 07: weren't born then. Oh, sorry, sorry,

03:17:31 Speaker 07: Dana, I was talking about you,

03:17:32 Speaker 07: but there's something like only 10

03:17:33 Speaker 07: years left, and a lot of

03:17:35 Speaker 07: landfills. Left in a lot of

03:17:38 Speaker 07: landfill sites in Ontario. When that

03:17:41 Speaker 07: demand changes, you know the demand

03:17:42 Speaker 07: stays the same. The supply comes

03:17:46 Speaker 07: down. Economics: the cost is going

03:17:47 Speaker 07: up, and we need to start

03:17:49 Speaker 07: looking ahead ten years from now,

03:17:51 Speaker 07: not looking at the next election,

03:17:53 Speaker 07: frankly, and moving ahead and figuring

03:17:55 Speaker 07: out how we can do this.

03:17:58 Speaker 07: At some point, there's potentially nine

03:18:01 Speaker 07: municipalities are going to be looking

03:18:03 Speaker 07: at spending two hundred and fifty

03:18:05 Speaker 07: thousand dollars on a consult. A

03:18:06 Speaker 07: thousand dollars on a consultant's report.

03:18:08 Speaker 07: If we don't get crack together

03:18:10 Speaker 07: and try and do it as

03:18:11 Speaker 07: one, and move the ball forward

03:18:14 Speaker 07: in behalf of all of us,

03:18:16 Speaker 07: and and start looking at it

03:18:17 Speaker 07: now. The last report I think

03:18:22 Speaker 07: you said was two thousand or

03:18:26 Speaker 07: twenty twenty. That the last time

03:18:28 Speaker 07: we looked at it, we didn't

03:18:30 Speaker 07: get the funding to do the

03:18:32 Speaker 07: report. And I know Al Barfet

03:18:33 Speaker 07: was around at the time because

03:18:35 Speaker 07: I can picture him out at

03:18:37 Speaker 07: where we were at the time

03:18:39 Speaker 07: having the discussion. That's five years

03:18:40 Speaker 07: that have gone by already. So

03:18:42 Speaker 07: double that by two. and all

03:18:44 Speaker 07: of a sudden we're in trouble.

03:18:45 Speaker 07: So we need to start thinking

03:18:47 Speaker 07: ahead, and that was the whole

03:18:50 Speaker 07: thought in the discussion at the

03:18:52 Speaker 07: committee. Is each of us has

03:18:54 Speaker 07: individual contracts, each of us has

03:18:56 Speaker 07: different landfill abilities, but at some

03:18:57 Speaker 07: point we're all going to get

03:19:02 Speaker 07: whacked. So we'd be better to

03:19:04 Speaker 07: put our heads together, move the

03:19:07 Speaker 07: ball forward, and be ready when

03:19:12 Speaker 07: when we do get whacked. So

03:19:14 Speaker 30: that was the thinking, and why

03:19:19 Speaker 30: we're looking at trying to plan

03:19:22 Speaker 30: ahead and spend a little bit

03:19:23 Speaker 51: of money now. Thanks. Okay, we'll

03:19:26 Speaker 51: go over to Councillor McQueen. Thank

03:19:28 Speaker 51: you, Madam Warden, and good discussion.

03:19:30 Speaker 51: And I know over the years

03:19:31 Speaker 51: we did have discussion about a

03:19:33 Speaker 51: regional approach. I know with us

03:19:34 Speaker 51: with Grey Highlands, we went into

03:19:36 Speaker 51: a contract with the first time

03:19:38 Speaker 51: with the bins, and I know

03:19:39 Speaker 51: our colleagues from the South have

03:19:41 Speaker 51: been doing it for a lot

03:19:43 Speaker 51: of years, and that we tried

03:19:44 Speaker 51: it, and it seems like people

03:19:46 Speaker 51: like them. From saying that. that

03:19:48 Speaker 51: contract, when that garbage is picked

03:19:49 Speaker 51: up from our roadside, it doesn't

03:19:50 Speaker 51: go into our landfill. It leaves

03:19:52 Speaker 51: our municipality and goes somewhere else.

03:19:53 Speaker 51: I mean, we do have a

03:19:55 Speaker 51: landfill that people bring tipping fees

03:19:56 Speaker 51: and or to you know like

03:19:57 Speaker 51: land like whatever they have for

03:19:59 Speaker 51: trailers and stuff like that. But

03:20:06 Speaker 51: under that contract, now we don't

03:20:06 Speaker 52: have organics, but it it leaves

03:20:08 Speaker 26: just from that contract, and

03:20:11 Speaker 26: we just moved a motion to

03:20:12 Speaker 26: extend. that for two more years.

03:20:14 Speaker 26: It was originally three, and to

03:20:16 Speaker 26: look at for two ext an

03:20:19 Speaker 26: extension of two more years. So

03:20:21 Speaker 26: there is models out there that

03:20:23 Speaker 26: for whatever, however, but I will

03:20:25 Speaker 26: say that just in the sense

03:20:26 Speaker 26: of today's today's dynamics around garbage

03:20:30 Speaker 26: and organics. I think myself, Councillor

03:20:32 Speaker 26: Milone, Councillor Eccles, we attended a

03:20:34 Speaker 26: session or a fella a year

03:20:36 Speaker 26: ago last January at Roma. That

03:20:39 Speaker 26: I think it's actually in Southgate

03:20:43 Speaker 26: that they're taking. organics and making

03:20:47 Speaker 26: energy, so the dynamics have changed

03:20:51 Speaker 26: because there is money in the

03:20:53 Speaker 26: in those organics now because they

03:20:54 Speaker 26: are converting that organics into energy

03:20:58 Speaker 26: and gas or clean gas or

03:21:02 Speaker 26: whatever. So there there is a

03:21:03 Speaker 26: lot of dynamics that are changing,

03:21:07 Speaker 26: and you know, efficiency is is

03:21:09 Speaker 26: good is good. It just I

03:21:12 Speaker 26: know when we went to that

03:21:14 Speaker 26: contract, it we we still have

03:21:15 Speaker 26: to pay, it's still there on

03:21:19 Speaker 26: that sense of cost, but material

03:21:24 Speaker 26: does leave. If if the if

03:21:27 Speaker 26: if the part is around not

03:21:28 Speaker 26: having landfill space, so I just

03:21:30 Speaker 26: shared that. Okay, thank you. Any

03:21:33 Speaker 26: other discussion? Yes, Councillor Finger. Thanks,

03:21:38 Speaker 26: Warden. Yeah, I just offering my

03:21:46 Speaker 26: support to Councillor Body over there.

03:21:49 Speaker 26: This is really a process. I

03:21:51 Speaker 26: think we wanted to get going,

03:21:53 Speaker 26: as opposed to having nine single

03:21:55 Speaker 07: voices trying to fight your own

03:21:56 Speaker 07: battle that we. can unite and

03:21:58 Speaker 07: be one voice as a group

03:22:00 Speaker 07: and do better things to make

03:22:02 Speaker 07: efficiencies in the in the world

03:22:05 Speaker 07: of waste management. We all know

03:22:07 Speaker 07: that things have changed a lot

03:22:10 Speaker 07: in 30 years, so and are

03:22:12 Speaker 07: still changing and evolving every day.

03:22:13 Speaker 07: But it was really around us

03:22:16 Speaker 07: trying to find efficiencies amongst the

03:22:17 Speaker 07: nine of us to be able

03:22:20 Speaker 07: to move us forward. You're right;

03:22:23 Speaker 07: it's quarter of a million dollars

03:22:25 Speaker 07: as they ask. Hopefully, we don't

03:22:29 Speaker 07: get that far on it on

03:22:31 Speaker 07: the price side of things, but

03:22:34 Speaker 07: we don't know what we don't

03:22:35 Speaker 07: know right now. So we need

03:22:40 Speaker 07: to ask the question. Okay, thank

03:22:42 Speaker 07: you, Councillor Greg. Yeah, I was

03:22:45 Speaker 07: just going to say one of

03:22:47 Speaker 07: the most controversial discussions, probably any

03:22:48 Speaker 07: municipalities could have in the province,

03:22:50 Speaker 07: would be on waste management. And

03:22:52 Speaker 07: when you get talking about right

03:22:53 Speaker 07: across boundaries from each other, so

03:22:55 Speaker 07: this more than a lot of

03:22:56 Speaker 07: studies, it does have a value

03:22:58 Speaker 07: add in terms of if it

03:23:00 Speaker 07: is demonstrated. And I'm looking at

03:23:02 Speaker 07: it right now. It was 1998.

03:23:07 Speaker 07: Was the landfill study because there's

03:23:09 Speaker 07: a preferred landfill site that's on

03:23:10 Speaker 07: page five of 533 pages right

03:23:11 Speaker 07: there in front of me. It

03:23:14 Speaker 07: gives you as a council that

03:23:16 Speaker 07: document that can prevent you from

03:23:19 Speaker 07: literally going at each other across

03:23:21 Speaker 07: the table on on a discussion

03:23:22 Speaker 07: that is can be and is

03:23:24 Speaker 07: demonstrated to be so controversial and

03:23:26 Speaker 07: as. member body indicated, waste management

03:23:27 Speaker 07: in the province is only going

03:23:30 Speaker 07: to get more strenuous, and it's

03:23:32 Speaker 07: occurring extremely quickly with population growth,

03:23:33 Speaker 07: even even shortening that window. So

03:23:36 Speaker 07: we are going to get there,

03:23:38 Speaker 07: but I think at least the

03:23:40 Speaker 07: value in the document is it

03:23:42 Speaker 07: does provide probably a better environment

03:23:43 Speaker 07: for proper discussion. and again, this

03:23:44 Speaker 07: time is only an ask to

03:23:46 Speaker 07: go into the budget. But if

03:23:47 Speaker 07: it does advance, it takes away

03:23:53 Speaker 07: some of the the personal feelings

03:23:54 Speaker 07: in such a controversial discussion. So,

03:23:57 Speaker 07: thanks. Okay, thank you. We'll go

03:23:59 Speaker 07: back. Just no first hands. I'll

03:24:02 Speaker 10: go back to Councillor McQueen. Well,

03:24:04 Speaker 10: thank you, Madam Warden, and. certainly,

03:24:06 Speaker 10: do we have to spend two

03:24:07 Speaker 10: hundred fifty thousand to have that

03:24:08 Speaker 10: discussion, or should we have a

03:24:10 Speaker 10: a discussion on the report that

03:24:11 Speaker 10: that Councillor Eklund just talked about?

03:24:13 Speaker 10: In because thinking, and I know

03:24:14 Speaker 10: in the past some municipalities had

03:24:16 Speaker 10: landfill space and others didn't, and

03:24:19 Speaker 10: I remember the discussion; some didn't

03:24:21 Speaker 10: want to give up that space

03:24:22 Speaker 10: for others. But if the new

03:24:23 Speaker 10: mall is, say, for example, like

03:24:26 Speaker 10: our contract, we have a a

03:24:29 Speaker 10: county-wide contract. pick up all the

03:24:31 Speaker 10: garbage it leaves. Maybe still have

03:24:32 Speaker 10: your your your own waste station

03:24:34 Speaker 10: for your for what comes in,

03:24:35 Speaker 10: but the garbage itself is from

03:24:36 Speaker 10: a contract across across the county.

03:24:37 Speaker 10: I mean, like like to do

03:24:39 Speaker 10: that, like what would be involved

03:24:41 Speaker 10: with looking at that? I just

03:24:42 Speaker 10: know from it was a little

03:24:43 Speaker 10: bit tough for us to get

03:24:45 Speaker 10: follow through on what we ended

03:24:47 Speaker 10: up going down with. the bins,

03:24:50 Speaker 10: you know, people saying pulling and

03:24:51 Speaker 10: stuff like that. I know Southgate

03:24:53 Speaker 10: has been doing it. There was

03:24:54 Speaker 10: some education from Southgate to our

03:24:55 Speaker 10: staff and stuff, but it's gone

03:24:58 Speaker 10: through that process and it seems

03:25:00 Speaker 10: to work. But it leaves. So

03:25:01 Speaker 10: is that an easy possibility? I

03:25:02 Speaker 10: know. Yeah, I know. I don't

03:25:03 Speaker 10: know what all the contracts coming

03:25:05 Speaker 10: due with all the municipalities, but

03:25:06 Speaker 10: if you have a larger company

03:25:08 Speaker 10: that's dealing with garbage, all we're

03:25:11 Speaker 10: looking at. is providing the service.

03:25:13 Speaker 10: I guess it's for the cost

03:25:14 Speaker 10: and what that cost is. But

03:25:18 Speaker 10: if those that don't have landfill

03:25:22 Speaker 10: space, obviously that's a bigger issue.

03:25:23 Speaker 10: Then, but even for ourselves, the

03:25:26 Speaker 10: roadside garbage is not going into our landfill, which is sort of unique. Which I think maybe helps eliminate some of that issue that was the issues of the past. Was we got space, you don't have space. Sorry, we don't want you to use our space because that's our space. I think that was part of the issue a few years back. The same. Okay, thank you very much. And of course, we are just voting on on bringing it forth for discussion in the 2026 budget. So so this this dialogueue is very healthy. I think that gives staff a little heads up about the kinds of questions that are going to be coming forward. And and in addition to that, would be the lens of what's changed. I know from the Town of Blue Mountains, we've extended the life of our landfill. because we do drywall diversion and drywall recycling made a huge difference. So that again would be a different picture than what was happening 30 years ago. I also hear from from the varied experiences of of the historic dialogueues on this that I'm sure all of us are going to be keen to get a hold of that 1994 report and be able to be on the same page when we come back to this and have a discussion. If somebody's referring to something to be able to get the full picture, and I think that will be a healthy continuation. of this dialogueue at that point in time. Okay, so with that, then I don't see any further hands up, and it was for all of the seven items that were contained in that report. So I'll call the question. All those in favour, and that motion is carried. Thank you. So we'll need a moment to switch over to go into closed meeting, but I'll need the motion to go into closed. It's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to Section Two Thirty Nine Two of the Municipal Act Two Thousand and One. Act 2001 as amended to discuss labour relations or employee negotiations regarding social services. Opsu Local 266 may ask for a motion. Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded by Councillor McKay. All those in favour.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.