Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — November 13, 2025
Hook: Student Tragedy Acknowledged Closed Session
Grey County · County Council · November 13, 2025
Summary
County Council convened with Warden Stephanie Patterson calling order and acknowledging traditional territories on November 13, 2025. The session concluded by adopting closed minutes from October and passing new bylaws for land transactions within City of One Sound while sharing community updates.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Closed Meeting Matters: Council members moved to adopt bylaws regarding the purchase and sale of lands in City of One Sound, which was carried without discussion. The meeting acknowledged a tragic loss involving students at John Deffenbaker Senior School before sharing community news about upcoming events like the Dundalk Santa Claus Parade on December 6th and Christmas on the Bay from December fourth to seventh.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- County Council
- Date
- November 13, 2025
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Stephanie Patterson as the Warden while Matrosov sent regrets due to an event in Oakville for the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, followed by a declaration of interest check and singing of O Canada before conducting roll call with all members present except Matrasov.
00:05:29 Speaker 01: bring the meeting to order. Warden
00:05:31 Speaker 01: Matrosov sends her regrets. She's attending
00:05:33 Speaker 01: an event down in Oakville, I
00:05:35 Speaker 02: believe, today for the Great Lakes
00:05:37 Speaker 02: St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, which. is
00:05:41 Speaker 02: kind of ironic, given certain things.
00:05:44 Speaker 02: Anyway, call to order. Declaration of
00:05:48 Speaker 02: interest. Is there any regarding today's
00:05:50 Speaker 02: agenda? Not seeing any. Oh, yeah,
00:05:54 Speaker 02: we can do that too if
00:05:58 Speaker 02: you want. And I told, I
00:05:59 Speaker 02: told Tara right off the top.
00:06:03 Speaker 03: I said, I hope the rust
00:06:04 Speaker 03: doesn't show too hard. But apparently,
00:06:05 Speaker 03: it's it's here. We go. Yeah,
00:06:08 Speaker 03: buckle up. Here we go. We're
00:06:10 Speaker 03: gonna have fun, but it won't
00:06:12 Speaker 03: be smooth. So let's stand for
00:06:14 Speaker 04: old Canada. Oh, Canada, our home
00:06:24 Speaker 04: and native land. True patriot love
00:06:30 Speaker 04: in all of us command. With
00:06:37 Speaker 04: glowing hearts, we see thee rise,
00:06:42 Speaker 05: the true North, strong and free.
00:06:46 Speaker 05: From far and wide, O Canada,
00:06:50 Speaker 05: we stand on guard for thee.
00:06:55 Speaker 05: God keep our land, glorious and
00:07:01 Speaker 06: free. Oh. Oh Canada, we stand
00:07:09 Speaker 06: on guard for thee. Thank you,
00:07:14 Speaker 06: Madam Clerk. Would you do the
00:07:21 Speaker 06: roll call, please, Councillor Mackie? Councillor
00:07:30 Speaker 06: McKay, Councillor Carleton, Councillor Pringle, Councillor
00:07:31 Speaker 06: McQueen, Councillor Nielsen, Councillor Patterson, Councillor
00:07:39 Speaker 06: Dickert, Councillor Kentner, Councillor
00:07:41 Speaker 06: Keaveny, Councillor Body, Councillor Gregg,
00:07:45 Speaker 07: Deputy Warden Milne, Councillor Dobrine,
00:07:49 Speaker 07: Warden Matrasov sends her regrets
00:07:53 Speaker 07: today. Alternate Councillor Hope, Councillor Bourdinon,
00:07:58 Speaker 07: Councillor. Eccles, Councillor Hutchinson, we have
00:08:01 Speaker 07: all members and attendees today,
00:08:05 Speaker 07: with the exception of Warden Matrosovs.
00:08:09 Speaker 07: Thank you, and we do welcome
4 Land Acknowledgement
Council members acknowledged the traditional territories of the Anishinaabe, Six Nations, and Haudenosaunee peoples before adopting minutes from October 23rd without discussion.
00:08:10 Speaker 07: everyone here this morning. So, before
00:08:14 Speaker 07: we begin, I want to acknowledge
00:08:15 Speaker 07: with respect, we are gathered on
00:08:19 Speaker 07: the traditional territory of the Anishinaabe
00:08:21 Speaker 07: Nation, the people of the Three
00:08:23 Speaker 07: Fires, known as Ojibwe, Odawa, and
00:08:25 Speaker 07: Potawatomi Nations. We give thanks to
00:08:27 Speaker 07: the Chippewas of the Saguenay and
00:08:29 Speaker 08: the Chippewas of Nawash. And the
00:08:32 Speaker 08: Chippewas and Nishnawbe collectively as the
00:08:33 Speaker 08: Sauging Ojibwe Nation, the traditional keepers
00:08:35 Speaker 08: of these lands and waters since
00:08:38 Speaker 08: time immemorial. To our south lies
00:08:39 Speaker 08: the traditional territories of the Six
00:08:42 Speaker 08: Nations of the Grand River and
00:08:44 Speaker 08: the Haudenosaunee. We are dedicated to
00:08:46 Speaker 08: honouring Indigenous history and culture, and
00:08:49 Speaker 08: committed to moving forward in the
00:08:51 Speaker 08: spirit of truth, reconciliation, and friendship
00:08:53 Speaker 08: with all First Nations, Métis, and
00:08:55 Speaker 08: Inuit people. Okay, now we're back
00:08:58 Speaker 08: to the question I wanted to
00:09:05 Speaker 08: ask earlier: Is there any declaration
00:09:06 Speaker 08: of interest related to any item
00:09:08 Speaker 08: on today's agenda? Not seeing one.
00:09:10 Speaker 08: Any, if one should arise, you
00:09:13 Speaker 08: can declare it at any time.
00:09:15 Speaker 08: Adoption of the minutes: We have
00:09:16 Speaker 08: the minutes there from the October
00:09:19 Speaker 08: 23rd, both council and committee of
00:09:21 Speaker 08: the whole, and we have the
00:09:23 Speaker 08: closed committee of the whole meeting
00:09:24 Speaker 08: minutes from October 23rd. So we'll
00:09:26 Speaker 08: take the first one. from the
00:09:29 Speaker 08: twenty third, Councillor Ackles and Councillor
00:09:32 Speaker 08: McKay. Any discussion? All in favour?
6.b Closed Committee of the Whole meeting minutes dated October 23, 2025
Council approved the closed committee minutes from October 23, 2025.
00:09:38 Speaker 08: That is carried. Similarly, the closed
00:09:41 Speaker 08: meeting minutes of the October third
00:09:46 Speaker 08: council meeting. Someone care to move
00:09:49 Speaker 08: that? Councillor Keaveny, Councillor Hutchison. Any
00:09:50 Speaker 08: discussion? All in favour? That is
7 Closed Meeting Matters
Council members moved to adopt bylaws regarding the purchase and sale of lands in City of One Sound, which was carried without discussion. The meeting acknowledged a tragic loss involving students at John Deffenbaker Senior School before sharing community news about upcoming events like the Dundalk Santa Claus Parade on December 6th and Christmas on the Bay from December fourth to seventh. Councillors also highlighted local celebrations for Remembrance Day in Meaford, noting that downtown businesses are owned by former slayers during Dragon's Den tonight at Mefford Hall.
00:09:53 Speaker 08: carried. We have no closed meeting.
00:09:56 Speaker 08: matters, no reports. We have two
00:09:59 Speaker 08: bylaws. Someone care to move there
00:10:02 Speaker 08: regarding purchase and sale of lands
00:10:05 Speaker 08: in City of One Sound and
00:10:07 Speaker 08: the confirming bylaw, Councillor Gregg and
00:10:09 Speaker 08: Councillor Debrine. Any discussion? All those
00:10:12 Speaker 08: in favour? That is carried. News
00:10:16 Speaker 08: today. Before we get into other
00:10:21 Speaker 08: news, I would like to acknowledge
00:10:24 Speaker 08: the tragic. passing of three students
00:10:26 Speaker 08: and the critical injury injury of
00:10:29 Speaker 08: one additional student from John Deffenbaker
00:10:32 Speaker 08: Senior School in Hanover earlier this
00:10:34 Speaker 08: week. On behalf of Warden Matrasovs
00:10:37 Speaker 08: and Greene County, I want to
00:10:40 Speaker 08: extend our sincere condolences condolences to
00:10:42 Speaker 08: those families, friends, classmates, teachers, and
00:10:45 Speaker 08: all of those who are touched
00:10:49 Speaker 08: by this profound loss. Very tragic.
00:10:51 Speaker 08: Any other news? Celebrations here this
00:10:56 Speaker 08: morning, Councillor Debrine, please. Good morning,
00:11:00 Speaker 08: Deputy Warden, and good morning, County
00:11:07 Speaker 08: Council guests. I just—I know it
00:11:09 Speaker 08: seems distant time frame away, but
00:11:13 Speaker 08: our Dundalk Santa Claus Parade will
00:11:16 Speaker 08: be held the first Saturday in
00:11:19 Speaker 08: December, which will be before we
00:11:21 Speaker 09: meet again. So I just wanted
00:11:23 Speaker 09: to. make mention that the Dundalk
00:11:25 Speaker 09: Santa Claus Parade will be held
00:11:27 Speaker 09: at 6 p.m. on December 6th.
00:11:28 Speaker 09: Thank you. Anyone else? Okay. Oh,
00:11:33 Speaker 09: Councillor Nielsen, go ahead, please. Thank
00:11:37 Speaker 09: you very much, Deputy Warden. Even
00:11:42 Speaker 09: though you were trying to skip
00:11:43 Speaker 09: Oh Canada, I just wanted to
00:11:44 Speaker 09: comment on the wonderful Remembrance Day
00:11:46 Speaker 10: celebrations across Gray County. I know
00:11:48 Speaker 10: many of us attended, probably as
00:11:51 Speaker 10: many as we could, in multiple.
00:11:52 Speaker 10: Probably as many as we could
00:11:54 Speaker 10: and multiple ourselves, and it just—I
00:11:58 Speaker 10: had an interesting conversation with my
00:12:00 Speaker 10: children about it, and some of
00:12:02 Speaker 10: their classmates that, unfortunately, don't seem
00:12:05 Speaker 10: to understand the importance or or
00:12:08 Speaker 10: fully understand why it's such a
00:12:11 Speaker 10: a special day for Canada. So,
00:12:13 Speaker 10: it was just a great opportunity
00:12:14 Speaker 10: to kind of remind my own
00:12:16 Speaker 10: children and and have a wonderful
00:12:18 Speaker 10: time in the community, talking to
00:12:20 Speaker 10: veterans, talking to community members who
00:12:22 Speaker 10: have lost. their own family members
00:12:25 Speaker 10: and various aspects. So, just commenting
00:12:28 Speaker 10: on that. Thank you, Dean. Anyone
00:12:35 Speaker 10: else, Councillor Keaveny? Please. Good morning,
00:12:37 Speaker 10: Mister Deputy Warden and County Council.
00:12:38 Speaker 11: And I just wanted to share
00:12:40 Speaker 12: that Mayfield will be hosting our
00:12:43 Speaker 12: Christmas on the Bay, December the
00:12:45 Speaker 12: fourth to the seventh, in our
00:12:47 Speaker 12: Market Square with seventeen cabins full
00:12:49 Speaker 12: of vendors, so you can do
00:12:50 Speaker 12: your Christmas shopping and there. Christmas
00:12:52 Speaker 12: shopping, and there'll be fun and
00:12:54 Speaker 12: activities and entertainment and food and
00:12:56 Speaker 12: drink for everyone. So Meaford is
00:12:57 Speaker 12: a place to be. December fourth
00:13:00 Speaker 12: to the seventh. Thank you. Thank
00:13:05 Speaker 12: you, Shirley. Anyone else? Councillor Cantner,
00:13:07 Speaker 12: please. Yes, I'll just add that
00:13:08 Speaker 12: tonight is the night to be
00:13:11 Speaker 12: in Meaford as well. It's Dragon's
00:13:12 Speaker 12: Den, and this has been going
00:13:13 Speaker 12: on for years now. And if
00:13:16 Speaker 12: you want to see a really,
00:13:18 Speaker 12: really entertaining and informative programme, be
00:13:20 Speaker 13: at Meaford Hall tonight, seventh. Be
00:13:23 Speaker 13: at Mefford Hall tonight, seven thirty.
00:13:26 Speaker 13: And again, we have a group
00:13:27 Speaker 13: of of dragons and a group
00:13:29 Speaker 13: of slayers, and it's going to
00:13:34 Speaker 13: be very, very exciting. A lot,
00:13:35 Speaker 13: a lot of money being risked
00:13:37 Speaker 13: on budding entrepreneurs. And we, the
00:13:40 Speaker 13: amazing thing is, I think about
00:13:42 Speaker 13: a third of downtown Mefford is
00:13:44 Speaker 13: made up of former slayers. So
00:13:47 Speaker 13: it's a great, great show. And
00:13:50 Speaker 13: I encourage people if they're interested
00:13:52 Speaker 13: in in economic development to take
00:13:56 Speaker 13: this. in. Thank you. Thank you,
00:13:57 Speaker 14: Ross. Sounds exciting. Anyone else, Councillor
00:13:59 Speaker 14: Body? If I may, I just
00:14:01 Speaker 15: want to follow up on Councillor
00:14:07 Speaker 15: Nielsen's comments. I learned at the
00:14:09 Speaker 15: Legion from a upper regional person
00:14:10 Speaker 15: that veterans aren't easily allowed into
00:14:12 Speaker 15: schools to share the stories anymore.
00:14:13 Speaker 15: When we grew up, we learned
00:14:15 Speaker 15: from our parents the horrors of
00:14:18 Speaker 15: war and why we don't want
00:14:19 Speaker 15: to go to war and and
00:14:22 Speaker 15: and. all of that. Now, a
00:14:24 Speaker 15: veteran has to do a record
00:14:26 Speaker 15: check. Apparently, they have to have
00:14:29 Speaker 15: it listed 14 days in advance,
00:14:32 Speaker 15: so parents can protest if they
00:14:34 Speaker 15: don't want their children learning learning
00:14:37 Speaker 15: about the horrors of war. And
00:14:39 Speaker 15: I fear with those types of
00:14:40 Speaker 15: rules that the next generation isn't
00:14:42 Speaker 15: going to understand those horrors the
00:14:47 Speaker 15: same way as most of us
00:14:51 Speaker 15: in this room did, listening to
00:14:53 Speaker 15: our parents growing up. Removing poppies
00:14:57 Speaker 15: from the workplace—that's I find really
00:14:58 Speaker 15: disturbing in this country. And if
00:14:59 Speaker 15: you have any influence, any input
00:15:01 Speaker 15: into boards of education, I would
00:15:04 Speaker 15: hope that you would share that
00:15:06 Speaker 15: this isn't this isn't appropriate. We
00:15:09 Speaker 15: need to allow our veterans into
00:15:14 Speaker 15: schools to spread that story down
00:15:16 Speaker 15: to the next generation. Thanks. Thank
00:15:17 Speaker 14: you, Ian. Anyone else? Okay. Well,
00:15:20 Speaker 14: thank you for those. You know,
11 Adjournment
Council approved adjournment to proceed with committee of the whole.
00:15:23 Speaker 14: motion to adjourn from our council
00:15:25 Speaker 14: portion of the meeting. Councillor Patterson,
00:15:32 Speaker 14: Councillor McQueen, all those in favour?
00:15:34 Speaker 14: That is carried. We'll just move
00:15:35 Speaker 14: over to our committee of the
00:15:36 Speaker 14: whole. Thank you, Rob. We'll bring
00:15:40 Speaker 16: our committee of the whole meeting
00:15:41 Speaker 16: to order this morning. Is there
00:15:43 Speaker 16: any declaration of interest on this
00:15:45 Speaker 16: agenda? Seeing none. Of course, you
00:15:46 Speaker 16: can. declare it at any time
00:15:48 Speaker 16: it one arises. We have two
00:15:50 Speaker 16: delegations here this morning. The first
00:15:51 Speaker 16: is David Willis. He's with us
00:15:53 Speaker 16: here this morning. There he is.
00:15:56 Speaker 16: Come on up to the podium,
00:15:58 Speaker 16: sir. He's going to be speaking
00:16:05 Speaker 08: to us regarding Keystone funding and
00:16:07 Speaker 08: services. So, good morning, sir, and
00:16:10 Speaker 08: welcome. The floor is yours. Are
00:16:11 Speaker 17: we good? Sorry to have my
00:16:12 Speaker 17: back to some folks. Not intentional.
00:16:14 Speaker 17: My understanding is I've been invited
00:16:16 Speaker 17: to come and speak a little
00:16:20 Speaker 17: bit about Keystone and the programme
00:16:23 Speaker 17: that we have, and how the
00:16:24 Speaker 18: funding from this body supports our
00:16:27 Speaker 18: operations across both, mostly focused on
00:16:28 Speaker 18: Gray County, but Bruce County as
00:16:30 Speaker 18: well. And so, without further, I
00:16:32 Speaker 18: will jump into just giving you
00:16:34 Speaker 18: a sense of what Keystone Child,
00:16:38 Speaker 18: Youth, and Family Services is. We
00:16:40 Speaker 18: are the lead agency for Gray
00:16:42 Speaker 18: and Bruce Counties. That is a
00:16:45 Speaker 18: legislated function by. the Ministry of
00:16:47 Speaker 18: Health that came into effect probably
00:16:48 Speaker 18: mid 2013 2014, and what that
00:16:52 Speaker 18: means is that we're the system
00:16:55 Speaker 18: planners for child and
00:16:58 Speaker 18: youth mental health both countings. We're
00:17:01 Speaker 18: also the the organisation that supports
00:17:03 Speaker 18: evaluation, that supports funding opportunities, and
00:17:06 Speaker 18: supports grassroots organisations in building up
00:17:10 Speaker 18: their capacity to support children and
00:17:12 Speaker 18: youth and mental health services across
00:17:14 Speaker 18: the region. We lead. local needs
00:17:17 Speaker 18: assessments and engage with youth and
00:17:18 Speaker 18: families and service providers in shaping
00:17:20 Speaker 18: the system priorities in three to
00:17:23 Speaker 18: four-year blocks. Which means we are
00:17:25 Speaker 18: accountable to the ministry and the
00:17:29 Speaker 18: provincial government to deliver on those
00:17:32 Speaker 18: plans. We are currently in the
00:17:33 Speaker 18: process of developing the next four-year
00:17:35 Speaker 18: priorities for the ministry. We also
00:17:37 Speaker 18: serve as the key point of
00:17:40 Speaker 18: contact with the ministry of children,
00:17:42 Speaker 18: community, and social services. and for
00:17:43 Speaker 18: those who are aware of our
00:17:45 Speaker 18: ministries, we lived in MCCSS when
00:17:47 Speaker 18: it was called MCYS, and then
00:17:50 Speaker 18: it was yanked out and put
00:17:51 Speaker 18: into Ministry of Health. Some services
00:17:53 Speaker 18: still remain in MCCCS. Some services
00:17:56 Speaker 18: are in Ministry of Health, and
00:18:01 Speaker 18: so we bridge both of those
00:18:02 Speaker 18: ministries to support children and youth
00:18:04 Speaker 18: in our region. So, if we
00:18:07 Speaker 18: and I apologize for how small
00:18:08 Speaker 18: that writing is. Hopefully, everyone can
00:18:10 Speaker 18: can. see it without their glasses.
00:18:12 Speaker 18: I just wanted to give a
00:18:14 Speaker 18: snapshot of the the breadth and
00:18:17 Speaker 18: the scope of services that we
00:18:19 Speaker 18: provide that this funding actually supports
00:18:21 Speaker 18: in many ways. So, from our
00:18:23 Speaker 18: counseling and treatment services, we have
00:18:25 Speaker 18: crisis support services. A great example
00:18:28 Speaker 18: of how this funding supports us
00:18:30 Speaker 18: is we have currently engaged with
00:18:32 Speaker 18: a trauma specialist who is on
00:18:34 Speaker 18: site in Hanover, supporting those kids
00:18:37 Speaker 18: and families. We have team based
00:18:38 Speaker 18: interventions, which is a wrap around.
00:18:40 Speaker 18: Interventions, which is a wraparound service,
00:18:44 Speaker 18: we engage with psychiatry, psychology, social
00:18:46 Speaker 18: work to to wrap around clients
00:18:47 Speaker 18: and families to support them in
00:18:50 Speaker 18: their mental health journey. We have
00:18:53 Speaker 18: specific partnerships like the Hospital for
00:18:55 Speaker 18: Sick Children, where we are a
00:18:58 Speaker 18: part of what's called telepsychiatry or
00:19:02 Speaker 18: Telelink Mental Health, where we are
00:19:05 Speaker 18: one of thirty agencies across the
00:19:07 Speaker 18: province who have specialized access to
00:19:10 Speaker 18: over fifty child and youth psychiatrists
00:19:12 Speaker 18: who specialize in. zero to eighteen.
00:19:14 Speaker 18: We have supported classrooms through our
00:19:17 Speaker 18: partnerships with Blue Water. I'm not
00:19:19 Speaker 18: sure if folks realize, but right
00:19:22 Speaker 18: beside this building, we have a
00:19:25 Speaker 18: 13-bed live-in treatment facility that was
00:19:28 Speaker 18: a partnership with Bright Shores. Within
00:19:30 Speaker 18: that building, there are two Blue
00:19:32 Speaker 18: Water School Board classrooms where we
00:19:34 Speaker 18: have 16 desks where 16 students
00:19:35 Speaker 18: who are struggling within the the
00:19:37 Speaker 18: regular. education system come and spend
00:19:40 Speaker 18: up to six months or a
00:19:42 Speaker 18: year with us to get them
00:19:44 Speaker 18: back on track and moved back
00:19:45 Speaker 18: into the the regular education system.
00:19:47 Speaker 18: We also have intensive in home
00:19:49 Speaker 18: treatment. So as part of our
00:19:50 Speaker 18: continuum of services, if we have
00:19:52 Speaker 18: a client who is with us
00:19:54 Speaker 18: in our live in treatment, and
00:19:55 Speaker 18: I'll speak a little bit about
00:19:57 Speaker 18: this further in the deck, we
00:19:58 Speaker 18: recognize that kids who come into
00:20:01 Speaker 18: live in treatment when they are
00:20:02 Speaker 18: released from live in treatment or
00:20:04 Speaker 18: they graduate from live in treatment,
00:20:05 Speaker 18: they often Live-in treatment; they often
00:20:06 Speaker 18: go back to an environment and
00:20:08 Speaker 18: circumstances that bring them right back
00:20:10 Speaker 18: to the reason why they came
00:20:12 Speaker 18: into care in the first place.
00:20:14 Speaker 18: And so, part of our mandate
00:20:16 Speaker 18: and our new programmeming has been
00:20:17 Speaker 18: that we embed child and youth
00:20:19 Speaker 18: workers in the home with the
00:20:21 Speaker 18: family up to a year after
00:20:22 Speaker 18: their discharge from our live-in treatment,
00:20:23 Speaker 18: so that that transition both into
00:20:27 Speaker 18: the community and into school is
00:20:28 Speaker 18: seamless, and that if they need
00:20:32 Speaker 18: a tune-up, they can come back
00:20:34 Speaker 18: in and we can support them
00:20:38 Speaker 18: to sort of get them back
00:20:39 Speaker 18: on track. When we think about
00:20:42 Speaker 18: prenatal and six years community support,
00:20:44 Speaker 18: Healthy Beginnings, which is a programme
00:20:45 Speaker 18: that is funded through this this
00:20:47 Speaker 18: council, in partnership with the Ministry
00:20:49 Speaker 18: of Education, they support new moms
00:20:50 Speaker 18: and dads and caregivers who are
00:20:52 Speaker 18: struggling with with the youth that
00:20:53 Speaker 18: they have, and we support them
00:20:55 Speaker 18: in healthy eating, healthy management. We
00:20:57 Speaker 18: give them a break sometimes so
00:20:59 Speaker 18: that they can catch their breath.
00:21:01 Speaker 18: Cradle Link is the same thing.
00:21:03 Speaker 18: We have volunteers that actually sit
00:21:06 Speaker 18: in the hospital and. hold babies,
00:21:09 Speaker 18: so that they have that skin-to-skin
00:21:13 Speaker 18: contact. Writer Futures Early On centres
00:21:16 Speaker 18: in building resiliency. I think those
00:21:18 Speaker 18: are quite familiar, probably to this
00:21:20 Speaker 18: group. We also specialize in fetal
00:21:22 Speaker 18: alcohol spectrum disorder, which, if folks
00:21:25 Speaker 18: recognize, is a lifelong disability. It's
00:21:27 Speaker 18: not a mental health challenge; it's
00:21:28 Speaker 18: an actual disability, and so we
00:21:31 Speaker 18: are supporting youth up to the
00:21:33 Speaker 18: age of 21 to function. with
00:21:35 Speaker 18: what we would consider an external
00:21:40 Speaker 18: brain beside them, supporting them and
00:21:42 Speaker 18: making better decisions, so that they,
00:21:45 Speaker 18: so that they are moving in
00:21:45 Speaker 18: the right path with the right
00:21:48 Speaker 18: supports, coordinated access mechanisms for children
00:21:50 Speaker 18: and graybeards. This this this supports
00:21:51 Speaker 18: youth up to seventeen years of
00:21:53 Speaker 18: age with complex needs, and this
00:21:55 Speaker 18: is a part of a larger
00:21:56 Speaker 18: programme that Keystone has taken on
00:21:58 Speaker 18: as the leader in, on behalf
00:22:00 Speaker 18: of the Ministry of Community and.
00:22:02 Speaker 18: Social Services, and that is for
00:22:03 Speaker 18: those kids and families who have
00:22:04 Speaker 18: failed out of our system, that
00:22:07 Speaker 18: they have knocked on every door,
00:22:10 Speaker 18: they have they have been enroled
00:22:12 Speaker 18: in every service possible, and we
00:22:13 Speaker 18: are simply not supporting them in
00:22:15 Speaker 18: a way that is possible. So
00:22:17 Speaker 18: we're the flow-through organisation where we
00:22:21 Speaker 18: support the family, and we we
00:22:23 Speaker 18: liaise with the Ministry to ensure
00:22:26 Speaker 18: that they have funding in order
00:22:27 Speaker 18: to support and purchase the services
00:22:30 Speaker 18: that they require for that specialized
00:22:32 Speaker 18: youth. We also provide respite services
00:22:35 Speaker 18: for autism spectrum disorder families. We
00:22:36 Speaker 18: are in a, I would say,
00:22:39 Speaker 18: a crisis mode in this county
00:22:41 Speaker 18: around autism. We have no permanent
00:22:42 Speaker 18: services to support kids and families
00:22:43 Speaker 18: with autism. So, with the very
00:22:46 Speaker 18: little money we get, we provide
00:22:47 Speaker 18: an opportunity for parents to step
00:22:49 Speaker 18: back, take a breather, maybe hire
00:22:54 Speaker 18: someone to come in for a
00:22:56 Speaker 18: few hours to support their child
00:22:58 Speaker 18: while they are regrouping and able
00:23:00 Speaker 18: to come back into the family
00:23:02 Speaker 18: situation and. to and to support
00:23:04 Speaker 18: the client. So, what we are
00:23:06 Speaker 18: really excited about at the moment
00:23:08 Speaker 18: is our new live-in treatment programme
00:23:11 Speaker 18: and our step-up, step-down programme, and
00:23:12 Speaker 18: that is literally right beside this
00:23:13 Speaker 18: building. It is the old withdrawal
00:23:16 Speaker 18: management site that the hospital had.
00:23:17 Speaker 18: Through partnership with them, that that
00:23:20 Speaker 18: ownership was transferred to us. The
00:23:21 Speaker 18: Ministry of Health was kind enough
00:23:23 Speaker 18: to invest about two and a
00:23:24 Speaker 18: half million dollars to move it
00:23:27 Speaker 18: away from looking like a withdrawal.
00:23:29 Speaker 18: management centre, and make it look
00:23:31 Speaker 18: more like something that kids and
00:23:34 Speaker 18: youth would feel comfortable in. There
00:23:36 Speaker 18: are currently 13 beds in that
00:23:37 Speaker 18: in that building. Six of those
00:23:40 Speaker 18: are dedicated for step up, step
00:23:42 Speaker 18: down, and that is a programme
00:23:44 Speaker 18: in partnership with the hospital systems
00:23:47 Speaker 18: across both of our counties. So
00:23:49 Speaker 18: what happens is there are 11
00:23:51 Speaker 18: feeder hospitals that that try to
00:23:53 Speaker 18: access the two pediatric beds in
00:23:55 Speaker 18: the Owen Sound Hospital as what's
00:23:56 Speaker 18: called a schedule one facility. Owensound
00:23:59 Speaker 18: Hospital isn't even funded to be
00:24:01 Speaker 18: a Schedule One for you, but
00:24:04 Speaker 18: they are managing to to supply
00:24:06 Speaker 18: two beds for us when kids
00:24:09 Speaker 18: who are in such crisis that
00:24:11 Speaker 18: they need to be admitted against
00:24:14 Speaker 18: their will. So oftentimes we see
00:24:15 Speaker 18: kids who land in the emerge,
00:24:16 Speaker 18: who are quite serious, maybe in
00:24:18 Speaker 18: a in a situational crisis. They're
00:24:20 Speaker 18: not admissible, which means that they're
00:24:22 Speaker 18: not really they shouldn't be in
00:24:23 Speaker 18: a bed in the hospital. but
00:24:24 Speaker 18: they're not safe enough to go
00:24:25 Speaker 18: home. So our step up, step
00:24:27 Speaker 18: down programme is that intermediary area
00:24:29 Speaker 18: for those kids. So we get
00:24:32 Speaker 18: a call from the hospital, and
00:24:33 Speaker 18: they say to us, and this
00:24:35 Speaker 18: could be at any day, any
00:24:37 Speaker 18: time of day or night. We've
00:24:38 Speaker 18: got a seventeen-year-old youth who has
00:24:40 Speaker 18: been self-harming, who has, you know,
00:24:41 Speaker 18: run into the into the law
00:24:42 Speaker 18: several times. We can't release him
00:24:43 Speaker 18: without someone to support him. Family
00:24:45 Speaker 18: doesn't want him. So we will
00:24:47 Speaker 18: show up at the emerge at
00:24:50 Speaker 18: two in the morning, and we
00:24:52 Speaker 18: will do an intake for that
00:24:54 Speaker 18: child into our step up. step
00:24:56 Speaker 18: down programme, where they are given
00:24:58 Speaker 18: what's called a thirty day assessment
00:25:00 Speaker 18: and stabilization opportunity, where we bring
00:25:01 Speaker 18: in psychiatry, we bring in psychology,
00:25:02 Speaker 18: we bring in social work, and
00:25:05 Speaker 18: we work with that client and
00:25:07 Speaker 18: family to best understand the needs
00:25:08 Speaker 18: in that moment for that youth,
00:25:11 Speaker 18: and that may be one of
00:25:14 Speaker 18: a continuum of services. It may
00:25:16 Speaker 18: be community counseling and support in
00:25:19 Speaker 18: the home. It may be admitting
00:25:21 Speaker 18: into our unit so that they
00:25:23 Speaker 18: can stay now up to a
00:25:25 Speaker 18: year. if that's what's required, and
00:25:27 Speaker 18: we can do intensive in-home or
00:25:30 Speaker 18: intensive in-school support as well. We
00:25:32 Speaker 18: also have the ability to step
00:25:35 Speaker 18: back up when that client is
00:25:37 Speaker 18: in crisis again. So the partnership
00:25:40 Speaker 18: allows that bilateral flow between the
00:25:44 Speaker 18: hospitals and us, and that is
00:25:46 Speaker 18: that has been a very busy
00:25:47 Speaker 18: programme, is all I can say.
00:25:48 Speaker 18: The next programme on this on
00:25:51 Speaker 18: this deck, which is launching in
00:25:53 Speaker 18: January. I think, is something that
00:25:56 Speaker 18: has been very much needed in
00:25:57 Speaker 18: this in this county for a
00:25:59 Speaker 18: long time, and that is an
00:26:00 Speaker 18: urgent access programme. And so, as
00:26:01 Speaker 18: I was speaking earlier about the
00:26:03 Speaker 18: eleven feeder hospitals, what happens often
00:26:05 Speaker 18: is that a child or a
00:26:06 Speaker 18: youth lands in one of those
00:26:08 Speaker 18: hospitals, and they can be sitting
00:26:11 Speaker 18: there and they emerge up to
00:26:13 Speaker 18: a week waiting for a bed
00:26:14 Speaker 18: in Owensend. And if there are
00:26:17 Speaker 18: no beds in Owensend, they are
00:26:19 Speaker 18: blocked into that hospital system and
00:26:21 Speaker 18: remain there. System and remain that.
00:26:23 Speaker 18: So we have signed agreements with
00:26:24 Speaker 18: the three hospital systems. We have.
00:26:26 Speaker 18: We are now in the process
00:26:28 Speaker 18: of hiring eight crisis workers, who
00:26:30 Speaker 18: will be deployed wherever those clients
00:26:32 Speaker 18: and families need that support in
00:26:34 Speaker 18: the emergency room, in the family
00:26:36 Speaker 18: home, in the school. It doesn't
00:26:38 Speaker 18: matter where at this point. We
00:26:40 Speaker 18: will support that family and and
00:26:42 Speaker 18: bringing down the temperature, so that
00:26:46 Speaker 18: we can then start working with
00:26:48 Speaker 18: the client and family to support
00:26:49 Speaker 18: what's next, and that could be
00:26:52 Speaker 18: anything from landing. next door to
00:26:55 Speaker 18: community counseling, and a broad range
00:26:58 Speaker 18: of other services. So that actually
00:27:00 Speaker 18: launches in January. We have a
00:27:02 Speaker 18: we have a what was our
00:27:04 Speaker 18: old living treatment in downtown Owen
00:27:07 Speaker 18: Sound that has been completely renovated,
00:27:09 Speaker 18: and will become a hub for
00:27:12 Speaker 18: crisis services. So when families want
00:27:13 Speaker 18: to come in and do counseling,
00:27:16 Speaker 18: they will have a dedicated space
00:27:17 Speaker 18: for them and the clinicians and
00:27:22 Speaker 18: the and. the youth, it will
00:27:24 Speaker 18: also be a walk-in crisis. So
00:27:26 Speaker 18: if kids are experiencing something in
00:27:27 Speaker 18: the community and they need immediate
00:27:29 Speaker 18: support, we will be there with
00:27:31 Speaker 18: doors open, waiting to support those
00:27:34 Speaker 18: youth. The other this next slide
00:27:36 Speaker 18: is really just an indication of
00:27:36 Speaker 18: where our focus is, and as
00:27:39 Speaker 18: you can see up there, seventy-one
00:27:41 Speaker 18: percent of our clients come from
00:27:43 Speaker 18: Gray County, and that's about seventeen
00:27:45 Speaker 18: hundred and seventy-five clients per year.
00:27:46 Speaker 18: Now, this isn't, and what I
00:27:48 Speaker 18: want to stress is when we
00:27:50 Speaker 18: see 2,500 clients, those are new
00:27:54 Speaker 18: clients every year. Those are not
00:27:55 Speaker 18: repeats; those are individuals showing up
00:27:57 Speaker 18: for the first time. And so,
00:28:00 Speaker 18: that's an indication of the need
00:28:04 Speaker 18: within our two counties, and specifically
00:28:05 Speaker 18: within Gray County, for mental health
00:28:09 Speaker 18: services. And it surprises me every
00:28:11 Speaker 18: time I look at our data
00:28:13 Speaker 18: to recognize that there is that
00:28:14 Speaker 18: level of need within within this
00:28:16 Speaker 18: region. The other piece that you
00:28:19 Speaker 18: know, and and this is maybe
00:28:21 Speaker 18: a little bit outside of what
00:28:24 Speaker 18: we're supposed to be having a
00:28:26 Speaker 18: conversation about, but this is about
00:28:28 Speaker 18: two of the programmemes that are
00:28:30 Speaker 18: funded through this this this council
00:28:32 Speaker 18: on behalf of the Ministry of
00:28:34 Speaker 18: Education, our Early On Centre and
00:28:37 Speaker 18: our Building Resilience Centre. And my
00:28:38 Speaker 18: understanding in being invited here was
00:28:40 Speaker 18: to, in some ways, justify the
00:28:42 Speaker 18: funding that we receive from this
00:28:44 Speaker 18: council to support. child and youth
00:28:46 Speaker 18: mental health in this region, and
00:28:49 Speaker 18: in the past we have been
00:28:50 Speaker 18: very lucky to have the council
00:28:52 Speaker 18: come to us at the end
00:28:54 Speaker 18: of your fiscal year to say
00:28:57 Speaker 18: we have some surplus, and we
00:28:59 Speaker 18: can support a deficit if you
00:29:02 Speaker 18: have a deficit. What I would
00:29:03 Speaker 18: say is we have never not
00:29:05 Speaker 18: had a deficit in these two
00:29:07 Speaker 18: programmemes, and so this is the
00:29:10 Speaker 18: first year that we are recognizing
00:29:15 Speaker 18: from council that there is no
00:29:18 Speaker 18: appetite or ability to have. Tight
00:29:21 Speaker 18: or ability to cover those deficits,
00:29:23 Speaker 18: and so what you're seeing in
00:29:25 Speaker 18: front of you is, in fact,
00:29:26 Speaker 18: what we are projecting as a
00:29:29 Speaker 18: seventy-three thousand dollar deficit in these
00:29:31 Speaker 18: two programmemes. We are committed to
00:29:32 Speaker 18: these programmemes in a big way,
00:29:37 Speaker 18: but we are also realistic on
00:29:43 Speaker 18: how we can support our staff
00:29:45 Speaker 18: and the programmeming to continue. So,
00:29:47 Speaker 18: if you look down at the
00:29:49 Speaker 18: bottom, we started. this journey
00:29:51 Speaker 18: for early on in 2010 with
00:29:55 Speaker 18: a with a budget of 230
00:29:57 Speaker 18: or 234,000. 15 years later, we're
00:29:59 Speaker 18: at 242, and that represents it
00:30:01 Speaker 18: represents cost of living increases. It
00:30:02 Speaker 18: represents unionized agreements and increases that
00:30:03 Speaker 18: come with that. It represents the
00:30:05 Speaker 18: cost of doing business, transportation, building
00:30:08 Speaker 18: supplies. Doesn't stretch far enough for
00:30:10 Speaker 18: us. So unfortunately. we are in
00:30:11 Speaker 18: a position where, if if we
00:30:14 Speaker 18: do not find some other alternate
00:30:15 Speaker 18: source of funding, that we are
00:30:18 Speaker 18: going to have to shift some
00:30:22 Speaker 18: of the funding that the council
00:30:23 Speaker 18: provides us to cover these deficits.
00:30:27 Speaker 18: I recognize that that is not
00:30:29 Speaker 18: the ultimate, or that that is
00:30:31 Speaker 18: not the intent of this, but
00:30:34 Speaker 18: our funding agreements with the Ministry
00:30:35 Speaker 18: of Health and NCCSS forbid us
00:30:36 Speaker 18: to to reallocate funds outside of
00:30:38 Speaker 18: ministry funded programmemes, and so it
00:30:41 Speaker 18: is a dilemma for us. We
00:30:42 Speaker 18: have. we've undertaken a broad range
00:30:46 Speaker 18: of conversations across the province with
00:30:48 Speaker 18: other early on centres to understand
00:30:50 Speaker 18: what they're doing and what they're
00:30:51 Speaker 18: doing well, and what we're not
00:30:54 Speaker 18: doing or what we're doing and
00:30:56 Speaker 18: not not in the same way
00:30:57 Speaker 18: as others are. And what we've
00:30:59 Speaker 18: come away with is a commitment
00:31:03 Speaker 18: to continue our early on and
00:31:04 Speaker 18: building resiliency programmemes because we recognize
00:31:06 Speaker 18: the value that they provide to
00:31:09 Speaker 18: the county and the kids. Early
00:31:10 Speaker 18: on, in particular. I I spent
00:31:13 Speaker 18: some time in Ottawa a couple
00:31:14 Speaker 18: weeks ago with an early on
00:31:16 Speaker 18: centre where they have speech and
00:31:18 Speaker 18: language, OTPT, psychiatry, in their early
00:31:20 Speaker 18: on centres, and it is a
00:31:23 Speaker 18: transitionary opportunity for those kids who
00:31:24 Speaker 18: identified as needing more support than
00:31:26 Speaker 18: just the early on centre, moving
00:31:28 Speaker 18: into the other services that are
00:31:30 Speaker 18: that are available for them, in
00:31:32 Speaker 18: a seamless way. And as lead
00:31:36 Speaker 18: agency in Grey and Bruce counties,
00:31:37 Speaker 18: our obligation is to ensure that
00:31:38 Speaker 18: every kid lands. where they need
00:31:40 Speaker 18: to land, and our early on
00:31:45 Speaker 18: centre should be a conduit for
00:31:47 Speaker 18: those who require more service to
00:31:49 Speaker 18: seamlessly move into those programmemes. And
00:31:53 Speaker 18: so that's our hope, that's our
00:31:54 Speaker 18: goal, and and we are going
00:31:59 Speaker 18: to work as as hard as
00:32:01 Speaker 19: we can to ensure that those
00:32:03 Speaker 19: services continue with the support of
00:32:04 Speaker 19: this council. And with that, I
00:32:07 Speaker 19: would yield back to council and
00:32:10 Speaker 19: be open to questions or comments
00:32:12 Speaker 10: from anyone. Okay, thank you, Mr.
00:32:14 Speaker 10: Willis. Are there any questions from
00:32:16 Speaker 10: Council? Councillor Nielsen, please. Thank you
00:32:17 Speaker 10: very much, Deputy Warden. Just a
00:32:19 Speaker 10: question for you. You've spoken at
00:32:21 Speaker 10: the beginning of your presentation pretty
00:32:25 Speaker 10: extensively about working with youth who
00:32:27 Speaker 10: are experiencing crisis situations and such.
00:32:37 Speaker 10: So, just for my own clarity,
00:32:42 Speaker 10: the Community Safety Wellbeing Plan that
00:32:44 Speaker 10: exists and the situation tables that
00:32:45 Speaker 10: exist from that—it's keystone that helps
00:32:49 Speaker 10: with those situations. Just remind. Those
00:32:53 Speaker 10: situations, because from my understanding, it's
00:32:56 Speaker 20: a a large part of the
00:32:58 Speaker 20: situation tables are youth situations in
00:33:01 Speaker 20: our community, not so much adult
00:33:04 Speaker 20: situations. Absolutely, yeah. Any other questions,
00:33:10 Speaker 20: Councillor Kentner? Please. I guess we
00:33:12 Speaker 20: could really question you all day,
00:33:14 Speaker 20: I think, on this topic, but.
00:33:16 Speaker 20: Is the situation getting worse? Like
00:33:19 Speaker 20: I worked with you, you know,
00:33:21 Speaker 21: 25 years ago, and it's always
00:33:24 Speaker 21: been there. But is it getting
00:33:25 Speaker 21: worse? And maybe some reasons why.
00:33:26 Speaker 21: Thank you. Oh, do we have
00:33:28 Speaker 21: all day? All right. Short answer
00:33:31 Speaker 21: is absolutely. And a great example
00:33:33 Speaker 21: that I can give is COVID.
00:33:36 Speaker 21: We are as a population. and
00:33:38 Speaker 21: particularly as youth, dysregulated coming out
00:33:41 Speaker 21: of COVID. So, when you isolate
00:33:44 Speaker 21: youth for three years, and they
00:33:49 Speaker 21: have a little bit of anxiety
00:33:50 Speaker 21: or a little bit of depression,
00:33:52 Speaker 21: three years later that is full-blown
00:33:53 Speaker 21: mental illness, and and we are
00:33:56 Speaker 21: seeing that in spades. Our numbers
00:33:57 Speaker 21: continue to go up. The acuity,
00:33:59 Speaker 21: the severity of those clients continues
00:34:00 Speaker 21: to increase, and so, as an
00:34:03 Speaker 21: odd but interesting piece of data.
00:34:04 Speaker 21: Eating disorders tripled during COVID, which
00:34:06 Speaker 21: means that kids were sitting in
00:34:09 Speaker 21: front of their computers, taking in
00:34:12 Speaker 21: all kinds of information around body
00:34:15 Speaker 21: image, around you know things that
00:34:17 Speaker 21: sort of support that emergence of
00:34:20 Speaker 21: eating disorders. And now we have
00:34:22 Speaker 21: this huge need for eating disorders
00:34:24 Speaker 21: programmeming across the province, so not
00:34:25 Speaker 21: just the province but the country.
00:34:27 Speaker 21: So we are we are seeing
00:34:28 Speaker 21: more addictions in our in our
00:34:30 Speaker 21: presentations. Autism is increasing at a
00:34:31 Speaker 21: rapid rate. and the comorbidities. So
00:34:33 Speaker 21: the, so the, you know, it
00:34:34 Speaker 21: isn't just anxiety. It's anxiety, depression,
00:34:40 Speaker 21: OCD, and other things showing up
00:34:43 Speaker 21: at the same time. And so
00:34:44 Speaker 21: we are, you know, what we
00:34:47 Speaker 21: would say is that 2,700 kids
00:34:48 Speaker 22: we could move through in a
00:34:50 Speaker 22: year. Some of those kids now
00:34:52 Speaker 22: stay with us for several years
00:34:54 Speaker 22: because it is that intense. So
00:34:56 Speaker 22: it is, it's a, it's a
00:34:58 Speaker 22: challenge. Any other questions? Oh, Counselor
00:34:59 Speaker 22: McQueen, go ahead. Councillor McQueen, go
00:35:01 Speaker 22: ahead. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Warden,
00:35:03 Speaker 22: and thank you for your presentation.
00:35:04 Speaker 22: Certainly learned a lot here this
00:35:13 Speaker 22: morning. Just in your brief time
00:35:15 Speaker 22: here, two things. I don't know
00:35:18 Speaker 22: if you're able to provide this
00:35:19 Speaker 18: information to our lower tier councils
00:35:22 Speaker 18: because I think information is important
00:35:24 Speaker 18: for to share what you're just
00:35:26 Speaker 18: talking about this morning. But from
00:35:28 Speaker 18: the private sector or from personal
00:35:30 Speaker 18: donations, is that something you receive
00:35:32 Speaker 18: as well, or can can receive?
00:35:35 Speaker 18: The short answer is yes. The
00:35:37 Speaker 18: longer answer is it is never
00:35:39 Speaker 18: enough. And and as a as
00:35:40 Speaker 18: an organisation that is funded through
00:35:42 Speaker 18: ministries and other mechanisms, I don't
00:35:44 Speaker 18: think it's good business sense to
00:35:51 Speaker 18: use donation dollars to fund operations.
00:35:52 Speaker 18: And so what we do with
00:35:54 Speaker 18: donation dollars is we do test
00:35:57 Speaker 18: pilots, we do proof of concepts.
00:35:59 Speaker 18: If there's a if there's a
00:36:02 Speaker 18: repair to a playground that is
00:36:05 Speaker 18: falling apart, we will. take those
00:36:09 Speaker 18: donation dollars and we will use
00:36:10 Speaker 18: that to rebuild the, rebuild the
00:36:12 Speaker 18: playground. That's what we do. Thank
00:36:14 Speaker 18: you again for that. A few
00:36:15 Speaker 22: years back, we had an individual
00:36:16 Speaker 22: that was in our museum in
00:36:19 Speaker 22: Blesserton, and we got the name
00:36:23 Speaker 22: Museum Rob. You know, we're going
00:36:25 Speaker 22: with, but he he sort of
00:36:28 Speaker 22: engaged with the youth, in a
00:36:29 Speaker 22: sense of pride and ownership. and
00:36:32 Speaker 22: he was quite successful, and he
00:36:33 Speaker 22: and he just got kids involved,
00:36:35 Speaker 22: and you know the Hanley Institute
00:36:37 Speaker 22: and other ones you know that
00:36:38 Speaker 22: are out there are doing great
00:36:39 Speaker 22: things. It's it's it's. I don't
00:36:41 Speaker 22: know if it's it's kids today
00:36:42 Speaker 22: don't have that pride and ownership
00:36:43 Speaker 22: or not. I don't know, but
00:36:45 Speaker 22: sometimes individuals can can make a
00:36:47 Speaker 22: big difference, and obviously your your
00:36:48 Speaker 22: your your groups doing that. But
00:36:52 Speaker 22: again, I just think it's awareness,
00:36:54 Speaker 22: and you know probably if there's
00:36:56 Speaker 22: good news stories, people like to
00:36:57 Speaker 22: hear those good news stories, and
00:36:59 Speaker 22: that could generate your funding as
00:37:00 Speaker 22: well. And that's what I'm saying
00:37:02 Speaker 22: is sometimes it's in the stories
00:37:07 Speaker 22: and the good news stories that
00:37:08 Speaker 22: you share. And you know, because
00:37:11 Speaker 18: you know, to see a deficit
00:37:13 Speaker 18: and see a programme that you're
00:37:16 Speaker 18: offering greatly reduced because of well,
00:37:17 Speaker 18: your funding from 2010 until now
00:37:19 Speaker 18: has hasn't changed a lot. And
00:37:21 Speaker 18: I guess the advocate, the advocating
00:37:23 Speaker 18: to the province as well is
00:37:25 Speaker 18: that happening as well, and and
00:37:28 Speaker 18: is there a role there as
00:37:32 Speaker 18: well? I would I would describe
00:37:33 Speaker 18: it as we chase the dollars.
00:37:34 Speaker 18: We are like I probably have
00:37:35 Speaker 18: ten different business cases that I
00:37:38 Speaker 18: continually circulate into the ministries for
00:37:39 Speaker 18: funding. And if there is any
00:37:45 Speaker 18: opportunity for one-time funding, we grab
00:37:46 Speaker 18: it. We've become very good at
00:37:48 Speaker 23: sort of chasing that dollar and
00:37:49 Speaker 02: and using it to support to
00:37:51 Speaker 02: support the organisation. Yeah. The challenge
00:37:54 Speaker 02: is, of course, we will never.
00:37:56 Speaker 02: I mean, if we were to
00:37:59 Speaker 02: get enough money that we needed
00:38:01 Speaker 02: to support all of the needs,
00:38:04 Speaker 02: it would be a massive
00:38:06 Speaker 02: budget, and so it is the
00:38:13 Speaker 02: reality that we live with. Yeah.
00:38:16 Speaker 02: Okay. Well, thank you very much,
00:38:18 Speaker 02: Mr. Wells. It was a good
00:38:22 Speaker 02: presentation, and we appreciate your time
00:38:25 Speaker 24: to come and talk to us
00:38:28 Speaker 24: today. Thank you. All right. Moving
00:38:30 Speaker 24: on, we have one more delegation.
00:38:32 Speaker 24: Greg Jones will be attending online.
00:38:35 Speaker 24: There he is from Skyline. He's
00:38:36 Speaker 24: going to be talking to us
00:38:37 Speaker 24: regarding development charges, deferral, and conditional
00:38:40 Speaker 24: exemption agreement today. So, Mister Jones,
00:38:44 Speaker 24: the floor is yours, sir. Well,
00:38:46 Speaker 24: thank you, Deputy Warden. Can you
00:38:48 Speaker 24: hear me? Okay. Yes, we can.
00:38:51 Speaker 24: Awesome. Apologies for not being able
00:38:54 Speaker 24: to attend in corporeal form today.
00:39:11 Speaker 24: My name is Greg. Jones. I'm
00:39:14 Speaker 24: the president of Skydev, part of
00:39:16 Speaker 24: the Skyline Group of companies, and
00:39:23 Speaker 24: I'd love to take the opportunity
00:39:26 Speaker 24: to tell you a little bit
00:39:30 Speaker 24: about Skyline and and about our
00:39:33 Speaker 24: development in Owen Sound and the
00:39:36 Speaker 24: development charges policy that you have,
00:39:38 Speaker 24: and how it's exciting to be
00:39:41 Speaker 24: able to invest in rental housing
00:39:42 Speaker 24: in the County of Grey. With
00:39:46 Speaker 24: that, I'll start a presentation. Can
00:39:50 Speaker 24: you see that? Okay, or should
00:39:53 Speaker 24: I? Oh, we can see it.
00:39:57 Speaker 24: Yeah. Okay. All right. So, a
00:40:00 Speaker 24: little bit about Skyline. We started
00:40:02 Speaker 24: in. the '90s, with student rentals,
00:40:03 Speaker 24: eventually we started buying apartment buildings.
00:40:06 Speaker 24: We have an apartment reit, an
00:40:07 Speaker 24: industrial reit, a retail reit, and
00:40:10 Speaker 24: a clean energy fund. Together, we
00:40:12 Speaker 24: have about ten billion of real
00:40:15 Speaker 24: estate assets in Canada. Now, the
00:40:17 Speaker 24: most relevant portfolio is we own
00:40:20 Speaker 24: and manage over twenty thousand rental
00:40:22 Speaker 24: apartments across Canada. about twenty percent
00:40:24 Speaker 24: of the rental housing, purpose-built rental
00:40:28 Speaker 24: housing in the county of Grey.
00:40:32 Speaker 24: So we are a landlord today,
00:40:37 Speaker 24: and we provide housing for people
00:40:40 Speaker 24: today in in the county. We
00:40:43 Speaker 24: have an industrial rate of about
00:40:46 Speaker 24: ten million square feet of high
00:40:52 Speaker 24: bay industrial warehousing. We have breads
00:40:54 Speaker 24: and meds with our retail rate.
00:40:56 Speaker 24: We're we're in small town Ontario
00:40:58 Speaker 24: across Canada. We don't own anything
00:41:01 Speaker 24: in major cities. We're all second.
00:41:04 Speaker 24: We're all secondary and tertiary markets,
00:41:08 Speaker 24: investing in grocery stores and pharmacies
00:41:10 Speaker 24: primarily. We are the biggest producer
00:41:12 Speaker 24: of bio. I'm sorry, but I
00:41:16 Speaker 24: can't help you with that right
00:41:20 Speaker 24: now. Right about that, we're the
00:41:23 Speaker 24: biggest producer of biogas in Canada,
00:41:25 Speaker 24: with our plant in Elmira and
00:41:29 Speaker 24: Lethbridge, Alberta. Co-founders and myself. as
00:41:32 Speaker 24: Skydev, we're currently building about one
00:41:33 Speaker 24: thousand five hundred rental apartments in
00:41:36 Speaker 24: Ontario at the moment. My partners
00:41:39 Speaker 24: are a couple of guys from
00:41:42 Speaker 24: Walkerton, Ontario, and Fergus, Ontario. What
00:41:46 Speaker 24: have we done recently? We've delivered
00:41:48 Speaker 24: over six hundred rental apartments in
00:41:50 Speaker 24: communities like Chatham, Tecumseh, Ravenhurst, Welland,
00:41:52 Speaker 24: Collingwood. We even do supportive housing
00:41:54 Speaker 24: as a pro bono initiative. for
00:41:57 Speaker 24: nonprofits, trying to make a difference,
00:42:00 Speaker 24: create meaningful value in in the
00:42:02 Speaker 24: communities we're investing in. What are
00:42:04 Speaker 24: we building right now? We're building
00:42:12 Speaker 24: in the town of Simcoe, near
00:42:21 Speaker 24: Port Dover, the city of Belleville,
00:42:21 Speaker 24: city of Owen Sound, which we'll
00:42:25 Speaker 24: we'll cover, and the city of
00:42:27 Speaker 24: Barry. We I'll just show you
00:42:29 Speaker 24: some imagery quick of our development
00:42:33 Speaker 24: in Collingwood. what it looks like
00:42:35 Speaker 24: today, where we are leasing rental
00:42:38 Speaker 24: apartments now. We always have great
00:42:39 Speaker 24: indoor outdoor amenity spaces. Just giving
00:42:41 Speaker 24: you a flavour of what we're
00:42:44 Speaker 24: working on. This is Simcoe, Ontario.
00:42:47 Speaker 24: I'll show you a quick clip.
00:42:48 Speaker 24: We're building 199 rental apartments in
00:42:51 Speaker 24: the county of Norfolk. I don't
00:42:52 Speaker 24: know if you can hear the
00:42:54 Speaker 24: music, but no, we're not, we're
00:42:55 Speaker 24: not, we're not hearing the music.
00:43:18 Speaker 24: We can see the video. Belleville,
00:43:19 Speaker 24: we have two buildings here: 166
00:43:20 Speaker 25: rentals with the central amenity building.
00:43:26 Speaker 26: We have a development in Barry,
00:43:28 Speaker 26: right on the 400. You'll see
00:43:30 Speaker 26: some towers coming up. We have
00:43:32 Speaker 26: 565 apartments under construction at the
00:43:34 Speaker 26: moment. Here's a quick. drone video
00:43:37 Speaker 26: of what it looks like today.
00:43:42 Speaker 26: Give you an idea of what
00:43:45 Speaker 26: we're doing and what we're building
00:43:48 Speaker 26: and what we're investing in. All
00:43:51 Speaker 26: these projects are 100% rental apartments.
00:43:52 Speaker 26: So, gives you a bit of
00:43:54 Speaker 26: an update there of what we're
00:43:56 Speaker 26: working on, what we're investing in,
00:43:58 Speaker 26: discussing the development charges, policies, and
00:44:06 Speaker 26: exemptions. The policy in place from
00:44:08 Speaker 26: the County of Gray is what
00:44:11 Speaker 26: makes rental housing possible in the
00:44:15 Speaker 26: area. We're investing big time in
00:44:17 Speaker 26: Owen Sound, and I'll just show
00:44:20 Speaker 26: you some pictures. The we have
00:44:22 Speaker 26: three buildings. under construction of eight,
00:44:26 Speaker 26: two hundred and sixty-seven new rental
00:44:30 Speaker 26: apartments, and we're, I mean, great
00:44:34 Speaker 26: views of the bay and the
00:44:37 Speaker 26: water. We broke ground a few
00:44:39 Speaker 26: months back, and you'll see some
00:44:41 Speaker 26: the buildings coming up over over
00:44:46 Speaker 26: the winter. The here's another photo.
00:44:48 Speaker 26: We're because of the policy of
00:44:51 Speaker 26: the county of Gray exempting development.
00:44:53 Speaker 26: charges for rental housing projects. We're
00:44:54 Speaker 26: also looking at making our Osmond
00:44:56 Speaker 26: Shores project in Meaford rental. Presented
00:44:59 Speaker 26: that to council a few weeks
00:45:00 Speaker 26: ago, as well as a destination
00:45:02 Speaker 26: boutique hotel. Just some quick renderings.
00:45:04 Speaker 26: So, I mean, we're investing in
00:45:08 Speaker 26: rental housing across the province. We
00:45:11 Speaker 26: are investing in the County of
00:45:12 Speaker 26: Grey big time because of. Great
00:45:13 Speaker 26: big time because of the policies
00:45:17 Speaker 26: in place, where you know you're
00:45:19 Speaker 26: you're able to build rental housing
00:45:22 Speaker 26: for regular people. Just we're targeting
00:45:25 Speaker 26: the average income in the area.
00:45:27 Speaker 26: You have a lot of retirees
00:45:29 Speaker 26: that sell their homes and make
00:45:32 Speaker 26: housing available to other people, and
00:45:35 Speaker 26: are able to move into a
00:45:36 Speaker 26: turnkey lifestyle with elevators, as well
00:45:39 Speaker 26: as some big projects in the
00:45:42 Speaker 26: area where you have basically workforce
00:45:44 Speaker 26: housing for people. to be able
00:45:46 Speaker 26: to live in and have great
00:45:49 Speaker 26: views of the water in both
00:45:52 Speaker 26: Oceansound and Meaford. So today we're
00:45:55 Speaker 26: talking about Oceansound and the request
00:45:57 Speaker 26: for exemption. I just wanted to
00:46:01 Speaker 26: share from a business perspective, being
00:46:03 Speaker 26: able to say, "Hey, we have
00:46:04 Speaker 26: an exemption on this on this
00:46:06 Speaker 26: property to be able to build
00:46:10 Speaker 26: more rental housing." What that allows
00:46:14 Speaker 26: me to do is get more
00:46:17 Speaker 26: investment. so it's not just people
00:46:20 Speaker 26: renting apartments. It's attracting investment in
00:46:23 Speaker 26: rental housing. It's not a very
00:46:24 Speaker 26: good yield. It's a, it's a
00:46:27 Speaker 26: long-term ownership situation where we own
00:46:31 Speaker 26: and manage buildings for decades. So
00:46:33 Speaker 26: we're, you know, we're implementing sustainable
00:46:35 Speaker 26: technologies because it saves money. We
00:46:38 Speaker 26: do solar, we do all all
00:46:40 Speaker 26: the all the LEDs and all
00:46:43 Speaker 26: the the things you can do
00:46:45 Speaker 26: to save on energy and make
00:46:48 Speaker 26: it. Save on energy and make
00:46:49 Speaker 26: energy. Kind of like our our
00:46:51 Speaker 26: Skyline Energy Fund does, literally makes
00:46:52 Speaker 26: money out of garbage and sunshine.
00:46:57 Speaker 26: So we're always after those initiatives.
00:46:59 Speaker 26: We build rental housing across the
00:47:01 Speaker 26: country and own and keep it
00:47:03 Speaker 26: for a long period of time.
00:47:08 Speaker 26: What the ask today is is
00:47:10 Speaker 26: to allow for an exemption on
00:47:13 Speaker 26: the entire development to mirror. what
00:47:16 Speaker 26: the city of Owen Sound has
00:47:20 Speaker 26: done, where we're able to attract
00:47:23 Speaker 26: more investment in rental housing. There's
00:47:26 Speaker 26: nonprofits interested in the property. I
00:47:28 Speaker 26: have more investors that are ready
00:47:29 Speaker 26: to to start the next building
00:47:31 Speaker 26: and the next building as they
00:47:32 Speaker 26: fill up. But for absorption, we
00:47:35 Speaker 26: started with the first three, and
00:47:39 Speaker 26: we'd like that confidence to to
00:47:41 Speaker 26: move forward and continue to invest
00:47:42 Speaker 26: in more rental housing for the
00:47:44 Speaker 26: county of Grey. For the County
00:47:45 Speaker 26: of Gray, and so the requested
00:47:47 Speaker 26: motions really similar to option two
00:47:49 Speaker 26: in your staff report, where we're
00:47:54 Speaker 26: asking for a ten-year agreement, exempt
00:47:58 Speaker 26: the first phase, and delegate staff
00:47:59 Speaker 26: to approve future phases based on
00:48:01 Speaker 02: criteria of delivering rental housing. So
00:48:03 Speaker 02: that's the the ask, and just
00:48:05 Speaker 02: wanted to introduce who we are
00:48:07 Speaker 02: and what we do. Bayshore Street
00:48:10 Speaker 02: Development is just Base River Street
00:48:13 Speaker 02: Development is just the name of
00:48:15 Speaker 02: the company that owns the land.
00:48:16 Speaker 02: We are Skyline. We are. We
00:48:18 Speaker 02: own over a hundred million dollars
00:48:20 Speaker 02: of rental housing in the county
00:48:24 Speaker 02: of Gray, and we're investing another
00:48:26 Speaker 02: two hundred million dollars over the
00:48:27 Speaker 02: next few years because of what
00:48:30 Speaker 10: this council has done and what
00:48:32 Speaker 10: staff policies created to make it
00:48:35 Speaker 10: possible and give people great places
00:48:36 Speaker 10: to live. Okay. Well, thank you
00:48:42 Speaker 10: very much, Mr. Jones. for the
00:48:44 Speaker 10: presentation. It sounds like you're a
00:48:49 Speaker 27: busy fellow with with your partners.
00:48:51 Speaker 26: Are there any? We do, as
00:48:54 Speaker 26: you mentioned, there is a staff
00:48:57 Speaker 26: report upcoming in this meeting later.
00:48:58 Speaker 26: Maybe not so later, depending on
00:49:01 Speaker 26: how council feels about it. But
00:49:04 Speaker 26: anyway, there is a staff report
00:49:05 Speaker 26: there. Are there any? But for
00:49:08 Speaker 26: now, are there any questions from
00:49:11 Speaker 26: council? Councillor Niels. Thank you very
00:49:15 Speaker 26: much, Deputy Warden. Just a quick
00:49:16 Speaker 28: question: You you spoken to the
00:49:18 Speaker 26: You've spoken to the purpose-built rental
00:49:19 Speaker 26: units. Is there a percentage that
00:49:20 Speaker 26: is being targeted for affordable housing
00:49:23 Speaker 26: rental units in this project, or
00:49:25 Speaker 26: is it just market rate? Mr.
00:49:28 Speaker 26: Jones, through the deputy warden, it
00:49:30 Speaker 26: is all market housing. We try
00:49:33 Speaker 26: to build more supply for the
00:49:34 Speaker 26: province of Ontario. We're we're open
00:49:36 Speaker 26: to additional grants to create deeply
00:49:37 Speaker 26: affordable. rentals, but we do try
00:49:38 Speaker 26: to target the average income in
00:49:45 Speaker 19: in a community. And if we
00:49:48 Speaker 19: charge too much, they would just
00:49:49 Speaker 19: buy a home. So we have
00:49:51 Speaker 19: to keep it affordable. From my
00:49:53 Speaker 19: perspective, deeply affordable, open to additional
00:50:01 Speaker 19: grants to make it more affordable.
00:50:05 Speaker 19: Just it's just math for us.
00:50:08 Speaker 19: We don't we're not against it.
00:50:13 Speaker 19: We do it all the time.
00:50:16 Speaker 19: City of Berry, we did ten
00:50:17 Speaker 19: percent affordable in the first tower
00:50:19 Speaker 19: through grants. through their CIP programme.
00:50:22 Speaker 19: Okay, thank you. Any other questions
00:50:25 Speaker 19: from council? Okay, not seeing any
00:50:26 Speaker 19: further questions for now. Thank you
00:50:29 Speaker 19: very much, Mr. Jones. And as
00:50:35 Speaker 19: indicated, there is a staff report
00:50:38 Speaker 08: later in the meeting. Thank you
00:50:40 Speaker 08: very much. Thank you, W. Warden.
00:50:42 Speaker 08: Okay, moving on. We have a
00:50:47 Speaker 08: consent agenda there. A number of
00:50:49 Speaker 08: items. Are any of those required
00:50:50 Speaker 08: to be removed for further discussion,
00:50:52 Speaker 08: Councillor Gregg? Councillor Gregg, six A,
00:50:53 Speaker 08: please. Six A, did you say?
00:50:55 Speaker 08: Okay. Any others, Councillor McQueen? Thank
00:50:59 Speaker 08: you, Deputy Warden. Six B. Okay,
00:51:01 Speaker 08: six B. Any others? All right.
00:51:04 Speaker 08: I'd take a mover and a
00:51:07 Speaker 08: seconder to deal with the others.
00:51:11 Speaker 08: Councillor Ackles, Councillor Bordignon. Any further
00:51:15 Speaker 08: discussion? All those in favour? That
00:51:17 Speaker 08: is carried, and we will deal
00:51:19 Speaker 08: with those two items later in
00:51:21 Speaker 08: the meeting. So we now come
00:51:24 Speaker 08: to the matters that require further
00:51:25 Speaker 08: direction and discussion. Is there an
00:51:27 Speaker 29: appetite to move the skyline report
00:51:30 Speaker 29: up to the first item? Anyone
00:51:31 Speaker 29: object to that, Councillor Nielsen? You're
00:51:32 Speaker 29: good with that. Do we need
00:51:33 Speaker 29: a motion, Madam Clerk? No, I
00:51:35 Speaker 29: think we'll just go on consensus.
00:51:37 Speaker 29: I don't see any objection, so
00:51:39 Speaker 29: we'll deal with item seven D
00:51:40 Speaker 29: first, which is the Skyline report.
00:51:42 Speaker 29: If someone would like to make
00:51:44 Speaker 29: make the motion to that is
00:51:46 Speaker 29: recommended, Councillor Debrine and Councillor Hutchison.
00:51:49 Speaker 29: Okay, welcome, Scott. Floor is yours,
00:51:52 Speaker 29: sir. Yeah, thank you. Good morning,
00:51:53 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden, and members of Council,
00:51:55 Speaker 29: and those that might be. The
00:51:57 Speaker 29: council and and those that might
00:51:58 Speaker 29: be tuning in today. So this
00:51:59 Speaker 29: report, as as indicated in in
00:52:00 Speaker 29: the title bar, was a team
00:52:04 Speaker 29: effort. This was was done by
00:52:06 Speaker 29: Mary Lou and and Lacy and
00:52:07 Speaker 29: myself. I'm just the lucky one
00:52:10 Speaker 29: that gets to speak with you
00:52:11 Speaker 29: because maybe I like hearing my
00:52:14 Speaker 29: own voice the most. I'm not
00:52:16 Speaker 29: sure, but I'll try not to
00:52:17 Speaker 29: to go over what Greg
00:52:21 Speaker 29: has already shared. And and and
00:52:24 Speaker 29: first off, I do want to
00:52:27 Speaker 29: reiterate the fact that staff are
00:52:31 Speaker 29: thrilled that companies like Skyline are
00:52:34 Speaker 29: are choosing to invest in our
00:52:35 Speaker 29: communities and. and more importantly, choosing
00:52:37 Speaker 29: to invest in rental housing. For
00:52:39 Speaker 29: years, many years ago, we were
00:52:42 Speaker 29: seeing a slowdown in rental builds,
00:52:43 Speaker 29: and and so the past, you
00:52:45 Speaker 29: know, five or six years, we
00:52:48 Speaker 29: we've really seen an increase in
00:52:49 Speaker 29: the number of rental units, and
00:52:51 Speaker 29: we're really thrilled that that both
00:52:53 Speaker 29: local developers and and those from
00:52:55 Speaker 29: maybe slightly further afield are choosing
00:52:58 Speaker 29: to invest in in rental in
00:52:59 Speaker 29: our communities in that regard. Just
00:53:01 Speaker 29: as a bit of background to
00:53:04 Speaker 29: council, for the last number of
00:53:06 Speaker 29: years, county staff have regular. County
00:53:07 Speaker 29: staff have regularly entered into what
00:53:09 Speaker 29: we call development charges exemption agreements
00:53:11 Speaker 29: for purpose-built rental housing, and and
00:53:13 Speaker 29: so these these agreements are under
00:53:15 Speaker 29: policy eleven dash one that that
00:53:18 Speaker 29: council has delegated certain signing authorities
00:53:20 Speaker 29: to the director of finance and
00:53:23 Speaker 29: director of planning in that regard,
00:53:25 Speaker 29: and would allow within certain limits
00:53:27 Speaker 29: the county to enter into an
00:53:29 Speaker 29: exemption agreement whereby the developer doesn't
00:53:31 Speaker 29: have to pay the development charge
00:53:34 Speaker 29: up front. The development charge upfront,
00:53:36 Speaker 29: and furthermore, if if they abide
00:53:38 Speaker 29: by the the terms of the
00:53:41 Speaker 29: agreement for the duration of the
00:53:43 Speaker 29: agreement, they actually never have to
00:53:45 Speaker 29: to pay the development charge. And
00:53:48 Speaker 29: in broad strokes, usually what that
00:53:50 Speaker 29: agreement says is from from from
00:53:53 Speaker 29: the signing of the agreement, you
00:53:54 Speaker 29: have five years to to build
00:53:56 Speaker 29: development, and then from first occupancy,
00:53:57 Speaker 29: you need to keep the development
00:53:59 Speaker 29: as rental housing for a minimum
00:54:01 Speaker 29: of twenty years. In that regard,
00:54:03 Speaker 29: the development charge exemption agreements that
00:54:06 Speaker 29: the counties entered into to date.
00:54:07 Speaker 29: have not been tied to affordability,
00:54:10 Speaker 29: but they are tied to to
00:54:12 Speaker 29: being long-term rental units. So somebody
00:54:15 Speaker 29: can't condominiumize their development, if you
00:54:17 Speaker 29: will, and and nor do nor
00:54:22 Speaker 29: do they allow for short-term rentals
00:54:24 Speaker 29: on a nightly basis. In that
00:54:26 Speaker 29: regard, so at a background level,
00:54:29 Speaker 29: that's that's what what the development
00:54:32 Speaker 29: charge exemption agreements do. As we
00:54:33 Speaker 29: heard from Mr. Jones, these agreements
00:54:35 Speaker 29: have been very successful. We've talked
00:54:38 Speaker 29: to developers that that have told
00:54:42 Speaker 29: us that. that this really turned
00:54:43 Speaker 29: the tide between investing in gray
00:54:46 Speaker 29: or investing in another community. It
00:54:49 Speaker 29: really made them consider and reconsider
00:54:51 Speaker 29: investments in rental housing in that
00:54:53 Speaker 29: regard. And we're thrilled because that's
00:54:56 Speaker 29: the vision that county saw, a
00:54:58 Speaker 29: county council saw a few years
00:55:01 Speaker 29: ago, and to see it pan
00:55:03 Speaker 29: out and to see more units
00:55:05 Speaker 29: being built in that regard is
00:55:06 Speaker 29: is simply wonderful. And so to
00:55:07 Speaker 29: get into sort of the the
00:55:09 Speaker 29: meat and potatoes of of this
00:55:12 Speaker 29: particular development. as Mr. Jones noted,
00:55:14 Speaker 29: they are looking at building 712
00:55:16 Speaker 29: rental units across eight buildings. There
00:55:18 Speaker 29: will be 168 one-bedroom units, 544
00:55:21 Speaker 29: two-bedroom units. They have gotten permits
00:55:23 Speaker 29: and started construction on their first
00:55:25 Speaker 29: phase, which is 267 units across
00:55:28 Speaker 29: three separate buildings. As Mr. Jones
00:55:30 Speaker 29: mentioned, it's our understanding that City
00:55:31 Speaker 29: of Owen Sound has entered into
00:55:34 Speaker 29: a similar development charges exemption agreement
00:55:35 Speaker 29: for the duration. of of the
00:55:38 Speaker 29: the 712 units, rather than just
00:55:40 Speaker 29: the first phase. In this regard,
00:55:42 Speaker 29: I will note that staff are
00:55:44 Speaker 29: recommending that the county just enter
00:55:46 Speaker 29: into phase one for now, and
00:55:48 Speaker 29: that we consider future phases as
00:55:51 Speaker 29: as they get closer to coming
00:55:54 Speaker 29: online. In that regard, certainly we've
00:55:57 Speaker 29: had other developments whereby we we
00:55:58 Speaker 29: entered into a development charges exemption
00:56:00 Speaker 29: agreement for phase one, and then
00:56:02 Speaker 29: when they were ready to do
00:56:05 Speaker 29: phase two, they came back and
00:56:06 Speaker 29: and we entered into a second
00:56:08 Speaker 29: agreement in that regard. Certainly, understand
00:56:10 Speaker 29: from from Mr. Jones and his
00:56:12 Speaker 29: colleagues' perspectives why they'd want to
00:56:14 Speaker 29: enter into a development charges agreement
00:56:16 Speaker 29: for for the entirety upfront would
00:56:17 Speaker 29: certainly assist with with long term
00:56:20 Speaker 29: planning and financing in that regard.
00:56:21 Speaker 29: But from a staff perspective, we've
00:56:24 Speaker 29: seen a lot of change in
00:56:26 Speaker 29: the development charges sphere over the
00:56:28 Speaker 29: last five or six years. We
00:56:30 Speaker 29: are coming up on a review
00:56:32 Speaker 29: of the county's development charges. background
00:56:34 Speaker 29: study and bylaw next year, and
00:56:38 Speaker 29: and so that's the opportunity for
00:56:42 Speaker 29: for council and staff and the
00:56:44 Speaker 29: community to provide feedback on on
00:56:47 Speaker 29: what's appropriate within those development charges,
00:56:48 Speaker 29: and and some of what's appropriate
00:56:49 Speaker 29: might also be those those policies
00:56:51 Speaker 29: around the the exemption agreements in
00:56:53 Speaker 29: that regard. So what staff are
00:56:56 Speaker 29: recommending here is is just the
00:56:58 Speaker 29: slightly more cautious approach of entering
00:57:00 Speaker 29: into the development charges exemption agreement
00:57:04 Speaker 29: for phase one, and then considering
00:57:06 Speaker 29: each future. phase as they come
00:57:07 Speaker 29: along, based on both the legislation
00:57:08 Speaker 29: and the county's own policy, as
00:57:11 Speaker 29: as they come out in that
00:57:12 Speaker 29: regard, I should also mention there's
00:57:14 Speaker 29: a bit of an error in
00:57:15 Speaker 29: the report, and and and Mr.
00:57:17 Speaker 29: Jones's team was nice enough to
00:57:19 Speaker 29: alert alert us to that, and
00:57:21 Speaker 29: that comes in the financial and
00:57:24 Speaker 29: resource implications section. What you'll see
00:57:26 Speaker 29: in that financial and resource implications
00:57:29 Speaker 29: section is is the county staff
00:57:32 Speaker 29: have said that the total development
00:57:34 Speaker 29: charges would be approximately three point
00:57:36 Speaker 29: three million. Approximately 3.3 million for
00:57:40 Speaker 29: the entire thing, and 1.2 million
00:57:42 Speaker 29: for Phase One. County staff, in
00:57:45 Speaker 29: in preparing this, misinterpreted the development
00:57:46 Speaker 29: charges legislation in this regard around
00:57:49 Speaker 29: development charges rate freezes. And and
00:57:51 Speaker 29: not to let myself off the
00:57:53 Speaker 29: hook here, but it's easy to
00:57:55 Speaker 29: misinterpret because there's changes about every
00:57:56 Speaker 29: four months in this regard. But
00:57:57 Speaker 29: nevertheless, we misinterpreted it, and and
00:57:59 Speaker 29: so there is currently a rate
00:58:01 Speaker 29: freeze in place, which dates back
00:58:03 Speaker 29: to the. 2022 development charges rates.
00:58:07 Speaker 29: So, if we were to carry
00:58:09 Speaker 29: that forward, and and that rate
00:58:10 Speaker 29: freeze is in place for a
00:58:12 Speaker 29: time limited period, but it is
00:58:14 Speaker 29: currently in place for for certainly
00:58:16 Speaker 29: the the pulling of the first
00:58:17 Speaker 29: building permits, and depending on how
00:58:19 Speaker 29: quickly the development proceeds, it could
00:58:21 Speaker 29: be future building permits too. But
00:58:22 Speaker 29: that 3.3 million dollar number for
00:58:24 Speaker 29: the entire project goes to about
00:58:26 Speaker 29: 2.6 million, and that 1.2 million
00:58:27 Speaker 29: for phase one goes to about
00:58:28 Speaker 29: 990 thousand. So the the dollar
00:58:30 Speaker 29: values are lower, but it doesn't
00:58:32 Speaker 29: change the staff recommendation in that
00:58:34 Speaker 29: because for the total development they're
00:58:36 Speaker 29: asking for a term and a
00:58:38 Speaker 08: dollar value that's beyond our staff
00:58:42 Speaker 08: delegated signing authority, we'd still need
00:58:43 Speaker 08: to go to council in this
00:58:46 Speaker 08: regard. So just to reiterate, we're
00:58:47 Speaker 08: recommending entering into phase one for
00:58:48 Speaker 08: now. There is already a temporary
00:58:49 Speaker 10: deferral agreement in place, so they've
00:58:51 Speaker 10: been allowed to proceed and get
00:58:53 Speaker 10: the permit. So that doesn't change.
00:58:55 Speaker 10: And get their permit, so that
00:58:57 Speaker 10: doesn't change. And then that we'd
00:59:00 Speaker 10: consider each phase as it goes.
00:59:02 Speaker 10: That said, certainly if council
00:59:05 Speaker 10: wants to consider another option, there
00:59:08 Speaker 10: is a further option considered in
00:59:09 Speaker 10: the report, and and similar to
00:59:10 Speaker 10: what Mister Jones has presented us
00:59:12 Speaker 10: here today. So maybe just before
00:59:14 Speaker 10: turning it over to to questions,
00:59:17 Speaker 10: I'll just see with Lacy and
00:59:19 Speaker 10: Mary Lou. Have I missed anything,
00:59:21 Speaker 10: or anything you'd like to clarify?
00:59:22 Speaker 10: Okay. With that, turn it back
00:59:25 Speaker 10: to you, Deputy Warden. Thank you.
00:59:28 Speaker 10: Thank you, Scott. And as Scott
00:59:30 Speaker 10: mentioned, there is. another option. So
00:59:34 Speaker 10: I want to be clear that
00:59:35 Speaker 10: the mover and seconder understand that
00:59:37 Speaker 10: they move to support option one.
00:59:40 Speaker 29: Is that okay? Very good. So
00:59:42 Speaker 29: that's that's the motion on the
00:59:43 Speaker 29: floor is to support staff's recommendation.
00:59:45 Speaker 29: Councillor Nielsen, please. Thank you very
00:59:47 Speaker 29: much, Deputy Warden. Just a question
00:59:49 Speaker 29: for you, Scott. The you kind
00:59:52 Speaker 29: of joked about it that every
00:59:54 Speaker 29: four months we're seeing changes in
00:59:56 Speaker 29: the development charges, and currently there's
00:59:58 Speaker 29: a lot of rhetoric coming from
01:00:00 Speaker 29: both the province and the federal
01:00:05 Speaker 29: government about development charges and and
01:00:07 Speaker 29: housing. Charges and housing. My question
01:00:08 Speaker 29: for you is: If we enter
01:00:10 Speaker 29: into an agreement like this, how
01:00:12 Speaker 29: binding is it? If the province
01:00:12 Speaker 29: and federal governments change development charges
01:00:15 Speaker 29: to be zero for purpose-built rental
01:00:16 Speaker 29: housing, which is kind of the
01:00:18 Speaker 29: conversation we're hearing that they want
01:00:20 Speaker 29: to see them be removed or
01:00:23 Speaker 29: limited or scaled back. And so,
01:00:25 Speaker 29: my question is: Is it almost
01:00:29 Speaker 29: a benefit to the developer to
01:00:31 Speaker 29: enter into the agreement for phase
01:00:32 Speaker 29: one because we're binding them on
01:00:34 Speaker 29: on this? We're binding them on
01:00:36 Speaker 29: on on this portion, rather than
01:00:38 Speaker 29: binding them if their province changes
01:00:40 Speaker 29: anything, and and kind of I'm
01:00:43 Speaker 15: trying to understand the implications that
01:00:46 Speaker 15: way. Through you, Mr. Deputy Warden,
01:00:52 Speaker 15: that is a great question, Councillor
01:00:53 Speaker 15: Nielsen. I wish I had an
01:00:54 Speaker 15: answer for you. It's it's something
01:00:57 Speaker 15: that staff have also been struggling
01:00:58 Speaker 15: with, and and certainly can't. I'm
01:01:00 Speaker 15: not in any way qualified to
01:01:02 Speaker 15: provide legal advice or or speculate
01:01:06 Speaker 15: on what future legislation would say,
01:01:09 Speaker 29: but from a lay perspective, I
01:01:11 Speaker 29: would say if the province were
01:01:15 Speaker 29: to make future for changes in
01:01:17 Speaker 29: that regard, it might depend on
01:01:19 Speaker 29: sort of the transition provisions and/or
01:01:20 Speaker 29: how far-reaching that legislation spoke to.
01:01:22 Speaker 29: You know whether it impacts on
01:01:24 Speaker 29: a go-forward only basis or whether
01:01:25 Speaker 29: there's some sort of retroactivity clause
01:01:26 Speaker 29: in that regard. But I think
01:01:29 Speaker 29: to give a more fulsome answer,
01:01:32 Speaker 29: a we'd need to know what
01:01:35 Speaker 29: the province is is proposing or
01:01:36 Speaker 29: putting in place, and and
01:01:39 Speaker 29: then b we'd need to consult
01:01:42 Speaker 29: our. legal counsel on that. Thank
01:01:44 Speaker 29: you, Scott. Any other councillor body,
01:01:45 Speaker 29: please. Thank you. Question from Mr.
01:01:47 Speaker 29: Taylor. Approximately, I don't know, a
01:01:49 Speaker 29: couple of weeks ago, so not
01:01:52 Speaker 29: approximate at all. We got a
01:01:53 Speaker 29: letter from the Ontario government that
01:01:56 Speaker 29: development charges. There is a
01:01:58 Speaker 29: policy change at the provincial level
01:02:01 Speaker 29: with regard to deferrals. Does our
01:02:03 Speaker 29: Grey County policy match what the
01:02:04 Speaker 29: province is suggesting? Through you, Deputy
01:02:07 Speaker 29: Warden, and I might have to
01:02:08 Speaker 29: rely on on Lacey for some
01:02:09 Speaker 29: of those two. Essentially, the the
01:02:11 Speaker 29: letter that we got from the
01:02:14 Speaker 29: province. One of the things that's
01:02:16 Speaker 29: changing in there is they're now
01:02:18 Speaker 29: allowing for a deferred payment until
01:02:19 Speaker 29: occupancy for some classes of residential
01:02:25 Speaker 29: development that weren't otherwise eligible for
01:02:27 Speaker 29: such deferred payments under the previous
01:02:29 Speaker 29: legislation in that regard. So more
01:02:31 Speaker 30: specifically, and and not to be
01:02:32 Speaker 30: so cryptic. Specifically, and not to
01:02:32 Speaker 30: be so cryptic, if you're wanting
01:02:34 Speaker 30: to build a new single detached
01:02:36 Speaker 30: home, you now have the option.
01:02:39 Speaker 30: My understanding is to pay it
01:02:40 Speaker 30: upfront, or you can pay it
01:02:42 Speaker 30: at the time of occupancy. These
01:02:44 Speaker 30: were changes that were enacted through
01:02:46 Speaker 30: Bill 17, and and then formally
01:02:48 Speaker 30: put into effect as of November
01:02:50 Speaker 30: 3rd of this year. So we're
01:02:51 Speaker 30: working with municipal treasurers, municipal CBOs,
01:02:53 Speaker 30: and planners to understand what that
01:02:55 Speaker 30: means and how that gets tracked,
01:02:57 Speaker 30: particularly at the municipal level. we've
01:03:03 Speaker 30: actually just scheduled an education session
01:03:05 Speaker 30: on this with with somebody from
01:03:07 Speaker 30: Hempstead presenting on December fourth to
01:03:09 Speaker 30: help fill us in on this.
01:03:11 Speaker 30: It's my understanding that our current
01:03:14 Speaker 29: development charges exemption agreements for rental
01:03:16 Speaker 29: housing would still be on line
01:03:20 Speaker 29: with the new changes because the
01:03:22 Speaker 29: new changes tended to impact other
01:03:24 Speaker 29: types. But my understanding through talking
01:03:26 Speaker 29: to our legal services staff, and
01:03:28 Speaker 29: this is where I defer to
01:03:30 Speaker 29: Lacy, is there might be some
01:03:31 Speaker 29: changes specifically with respect to how
01:03:32 Speaker 29: we register such agreements, but to
01:03:34 Speaker 29: go any deeper into that, I
01:03:38 Speaker 29: need somebody smarter than I am.
01:03:40 Speaker 29: Councillor Bordenil, please. Thank you, Mr.
01:03:43 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden, and through you, Mr.
01:03:45 Speaker 29: Taylor Scott. In relation to you
01:03:47 Speaker 29: were just speaking, we do this
01:03:51 Speaker 29: in phases, which is I think
01:03:53 Speaker 29: is a good idea. But to
01:03:55 Speaker 29: Councillor Nielsen's first question to the
01:03:58 Speaker 29: deputy in regards to the attainable,
01:04:01 Speaker 29: we always work with the words
01:04:03 Speaker 29: attainable or affordable. The provincial policy
01:04:05 Speaker 29: statement states it should be around
01:04:08 Speaker 29: twenty percent. When we're looking at
01:04:10 Speaker 29: our review or for the next
01:04:11 Speaker 29: phases, do we wait? Will we
01:04:14 Speaker 29: wait that heavier in, or do
01:04:15 Speaker 29: we wait for recommendations from the
01:04:17 Speaker 29: province to to match the PPS
01:04:19 Speaker 29: of approximately twenty percent to make
01:04:20 Speaker 29: it not just market, but at
01:04:22 Speaker 29: the eighty percent level? Thank you
01:04:26 Speaker 29: for your question, Councillor Borneon. That's
01:04:27 Speaker 29: a tricky one as well. So
01:04:31 Speaker 29: there's been some some changes to
01:04:34 Speaker 29: the DC Act over the years.
01:04:35 Speaker 29: and and there are thresholds for
01:04:38 Speaker 29: DCS. Excuse me for both rental
01:04:43 Speaker 29: and ownership, whereby if if they
01:04:45 Speaker 19: meet those affordability thresholds, then they
01:04:51 Speaker 19: simply don't need to pay the
01:04:53 Speaker 19: DCS. Again, it requires a similar
01:04:58 Speaker 19: agreement on title to to say
01:05:00 Speaker 19: that you need to maintain that.
01:05:03 Speaker 19: You know, it can't be just
01:05:05 Speaker 19: at the time of your building
01:05:17 Speaker 19: permits that you meet that. So,
01:05:20 Speaker 19: if strictly speaking, if they were
01:05:21 Speaker 31: affordable based on the the provincial
01:05:26 Speaker 29: definition, then they. wouldn't need to
01:05:29 Speaker 29: enter into this type of exemption
01:05:31 Speaker 29: agreement with the county because they'd
01:05:32 Speaker 29: be exempt provincially, so to speak.
01:05:35 Speaker 29: If we wanted to get into
01:05:37 Speaker 29: as part of the development charges
01:05:38 Speaker 29: review a further discussion on attainability
01:05:40 Speaker 29: or some other threshold beyond sort
01:05:42 Speaker 29: of that provincial affordability limit, I
01:05:44 Speaker 29: think we'd really want to consult
01:05:45 Speaker 29: heavily with with the development charges
01:05:47 Speaker 29: consultant and legal at the time.
01:05:49 Speaker 29: the province has talked about, you
01:05:50 Speaker 29: know, further definition of attainability, and
01:05:52 Speaker 29: there's been some speculation that that
01:05:53 Speaker 29: might be more of a modular
01:05:55 Speaker 29: unit, but we don't have a
01:05:56 Speaker 29: specific definition at the county level
01:05:58 Speaker 29: or at the provincial level just
01:05:59 Speaker 29: yet for what attainability is. Yeah,
01:06:00 Speaker 29: I think I'll probably leave it
01:06:04 Speaker 29: there for now, unless there's any
01:06:06 Speaker 29: further clarification. Okay, thank you. Any
01:06:08 Speaker 29: further questions? Not seeing any questions.
01:06:10 Speaker 29: I'll call the question. All those
01:06:12 Speaker 29: in favour? That is carried. Thank
01:06:13 Speaker 29: you, Scott. Okay, going back to
01:06:16 Speaker 29: the start of our direction and
01:06:19 Speaker 29: discussion. Bill sixty, Fighting Delays
01:06:21 Speaker 29: and Building Faster Act. That is
01:06:24 Speaker 29: a report from Scott Taylor. So
01:06:27 Speaker 29: I need a mover and seconder
01:06:29 Speaker 29: to Councillor Dicker and Councillor Carlton.
01:06:32 Speaker 29: Scott, floor is yours, sir. Great.
01:06:33 Speaker 29: I'll just my controlling Brittany. Are
01:06:34 Speaker 29: you? Sorry, I was just
01:06:36 Speaker 29: talking to Brittany about the slides.
01:06:38 Speaker 29: My apologies. Excellent. Thank you. All
01:06:40 Speaker 29: right. Thank you again. So this
01:06:42 Speaker 29: this report. I apologize. There wasn't
01:06:43 Speaker 29: a report based on the timelines
01:06:45 Speaker 29: here, but this presentation. really was
01:06:48 Speaker 29: a team effort in this regard.
01:06:51 Speaker 29: Maybe we'll just go to the
01:06:53 Speaker 29: next slide here. So Bill sixty
01:06:56 Speaker 29: is is another one of the
01:06:58 Speaker 29: provinces omnibus bills in this regard.
01:06:59 Speaker 29: And some of you would have
01:07:01 Speaker 29: gotten a sneak peek at elements
01:07:02 Speaker 29: of this presentation last week for
01:07:05 Speaker 29: those of you that attended the
01:07:08 Speaker 29: Planning and Economic Development Advisory Committee.
01:07:09 Speaker 29: I promise this will be a
01:07:11 Speaker 29: much better presentation this time because
01:07:12 Speaker 29: we have both Nile and Chair,
01:07:14 Speaker 29: and also speaking to elements of
01:07:15 Speaker 29: it. So you won't just have
01:07:18 Speaker 29: to listen to me. So it'll
01:07:21 Speaker 29: be great. So, so again, this
01:07:23 Speaker 29: is this is an omnibus bill.
01:07:25 Speaker 29: It touches on a number of
01:07:28 Speaker 29: different functions that that the county's
01:07:30 Speaker 29: done in this regard. And so,
01:07:31 Speaker 29: in pulling together these slides and
01:07:33 Speaker 29: and in pulling together some potential
01:07:34 Speaker 29: county comments on this bill, it's
01:07:35 Speaker 29: involved climate change staff, transportation services
01:07:36 Speaker 29: staff, finances finance staff, community services,
01:07:37 Speaker 29: CAO and deputy legal services. So,
01:07:39 Speaker 29: it really is a team effort,
01:07:41 Speaker 29: and and certainly value the the
01:07:42 Speaker 29: collabouration in that regard. we also,
01:07:43 Speaker 29: as I said, heard some feedback
01:07:45 Speaker 29: from the Planning and Economic Development
01:07:46 Speaker 29: Advisory Committee last week. I know
01:07:48 Speaker 29: within our own professional networks, a
01:07:49 Speaker 29: number of us are consulting to
01:07:51 Speaker 29: hear what others are saying and
01:07:55 Speaker 29: thinking in this regard. And in
01:07:57 Speaker 29: that aspect, we had a local
01:07:58 Speaker 29: planners meeting this past Friday morning,
01:08:00 Speaker 29: where we dug into this further.
01:08:02 Speaker 29: As with any large provincial change,
01:08:03 Speaker 29: there's some good changes, there's some
01:08:06 Speaker 29: positive elements that staff would be
01:08:08 Speaker 29: quite excited about if this. were
01:08:10 Speaker 29: to take effect. There's some that
01:08:12 Speaker 29: that we definitely have concerns with,
01:08:14 Speaker 29: and there's some where where we're
01:08:17 Speaker 29: simply it's simply unknown as to
01:08:19 Speaker 29: what the impacts could be at
01:08:22 Speaker 29: this time. I would say, and
01:08:25 Speaker 29: it it leads into our discussion
01:08:26 Speaker 29: we just had on development charges.
01:08:28 Speaker 29: Sort of the speed of change
01:08:29 Speaker 29: and the frequency of change is
01:08:31 Speaker 29: is really difficult to to continually
01:08:32 Speaker 29: adapt to and and adjust to
01:08:35 Speaker 29: in that regard. Not just reviewing
01:08:36 Speaker 29: the the draft legislation, but then
01:08:38 Speaker 29: starting to relearn elements. of your
01:08:40 Speaker 29: job as as those changes take
01:08:42 Speaker 29: effect, and and they don't all
01:08:45 Speaker 29: take effect at the same time.
01:08:46 Speaker 29: So you know, you suddenly find
01:08:48 Speaker 29: out, okay, well, November third is
01:08:50 Speaker 29: the deadline for this, and now
01:08:52 Speaker 29: we got to figure out what
01:08:53 Speaker 29: this means. So so I will
01:08:54 Speaker 29: say, and and certainly not looking
01:08:57 Speaker 29: for sympathy or anything else in
01:09:00 Speaker 29: this regard. But you know, we
01:09:02 Speaker 29: want to be partners with the
01:09:04 Speaker 29: province. We want to continue to
01:09:06 Speaker 29: work with the province to to
01:09:09 Speaker 29: achieve their objectives because many of
01:09:11 Speaker 29: their objectives match very closely with
01:09:13 Speaker 29: with county council state objectives. But
01:09:15 Speaker 29: if if there could be at
01:09:16 Speaker 29: at sometimes maybe. Could be at
01:09:18 Speaker 29: sometimes maybe just a brief slowdown
01:09:20 Speaker 29: in the change to adjust and
01:09:22 Speaker 29: catch up. That would certainly be
01:09:23 Speaker 29: very appreciated in that regard. I
01:09:25 Speaker 29: will finally also say that there
01:09:27 Speaker 29: are a number of legislative changes
01:09:30 Speaker 29: that have been directly announced through
01:09:32 Speaker 29: Bill sixty, and then there's some
01:09:36 Speaker 29: further changes that aren't actually changes
01:09:39 Speaker 29: to the legislation, but associated consultations
01:09:40 Speaker 29: of topics that the province wants
01:09:42 Speaker 29: to look further into, and and
01:09:43 Speaker 29: some of those consultations were teased
01:09:46 Speaker 29: back in the spring or. were
01:09:48 Speaker 29: first thought of back in the
01:09:51 Speaker 29: spring when we had Bill five
01:09:53 Speaker 29: and Bill seventeen in that regard,
01:09:55 Speaker 29: and so the province is
01:09:57 Speaker 29: picking up on some of the
01:10:00 Speaker 29: threads that that they had that
01:10:01 Speaker 29: started back then. With respect to
01:10:03 Speaker 29: some of the changes that that
01:10:05 Speaker 29: impact sort of the planning and
01:10:07 Speaker 29: development portfolio, I think maybe the
01:10:07 Speaker 29: one that I'm personally most excited
01:10:09 Speaker 29: about is is there's a proposal
01:10:11 Speaker 29: in place that the province would
01:10:13 Speaker 29: allow all upper tier municipalities the
01:10:14 Speaker 29: ability to offer community improvement plans.
01:10:16 Speaker 29: For those of you that might
01:10:17 Speaker 29: not live in British For those
01:10:19 Speaker 29: of you that might not live
01:10:22 Speaker 29: and breathe this on a daily
01:10:24 Speaker 29: basis, if prior to this change,
01:10:27 Speaker 29: this proposed change, only a select
01:10:29 Speaker 29: few prescribed, upper-tier municipalities had the
01:10:31 Speaker 29: ability to offer community improvement plans.
01:10:33 Speaker 29: So Gray County wasn't in that
01:10:35 Speaker 29: prescribed list. Gray, Bruce, and Simcoe
01:10:37 Speaker 29: have all been talking to provincial
01:10:38 Speaker 29: staff and asking the province, you
01:10:39 Speaker 29: know, could could we have the
01:10:41 Speaker 29: ability to offer such a community
01:10:43 Speaker 29: improvement plan? And so, if this
01:10:45 Speaker 29: change were to go through, then
01:10:47 Speaker 29: it would give county council the
01:10:49 Speaker 29: ability if they saw. fit to
01:10:50 Speaker 29: to direct staff to work on
01:10:52 Speaker 29: preparing a community improvement plan and
01:10:55 Speaker 29: and through that plan we could
01:10:58 Speaker 29: really target specific county initiatives and
01:11:00 Speaker 29: and so one of those might
01:11:01 Speaker 29: be further sort of incentives or
01:11:03 Speaker 29: or policies on on affordable housing
01:11:04 Speaker 29: in that regard or attainable housing
01:11:06 Speaker 29: in that regard so this is
01:11:09 Speaker 29: one of the changes that that
01:11:10 Speaker 29: kudos to the province this would
01:11:12 Speaker 29: would make a direct impact locally
01:11:14 Speaker 29: across the province some of the
01:11:15 Speaker 29: other changes they're consulting on have
01:11:19 Speaker 29: to do with streamlining the land
01:11:21 Speaker 29: use planning and building permit application
01:11:23 Speaker 29: processes. At our local planners meeting
01:11:25 Speaker 29: this this past Friday, this was
01:11:26 Speaker 29: a big topic of discussion. We
01:11:28 Speaker 29: actually had a few chief building
01:11:31 Speaker 29: officials in in the in attendance
01:11:32 Speaker 29: as well, so it was great
01:11:34 Speaker 29: to hear their perspective in that
01:11:36 Speaker 29: regard. And I think we'd all
01:11:38 Speaker 29: agree, any process can always be
01:11:40 Speaker 29: streamlined. We can do better, for
01:11:43 Speaker 29: sure. There's there's no doubt about
01:11:44 Speaker 29: that. Some of what the province
01:11:46 Speaker 29: is looking at here is looking
01:11:48 Speaker 29: at the use of technology to
01:11:49 Speaker 29: to streamline those processes. So maybe
01:11:50 Speaker 29: a further reliance on on artificial
01:11:51 Speaker 29: intelligence in that regard. They're also
01:11:54 Speaker 29: looking at maybe using common metrics
01:11:56 Speaker 29: or platforms for data tracking. So
01:11:58 Speaker 29: you know, I think there are
01:12:00 Speaker 29: elements that could be very positive
01:12:01 Speaker 29: here. I think with respect to
01:12:06 Speaker 29: this one, we just want to
01:12:08 Speaker 29: make sure that you know if
01:12:12 Speaker 29: if there were major changes in
01:12:15 Speaker 29: that regard, that they're they're phased
01:12:17 Speaker 29: in or people have enough runway
01:12:19 Speaker 29: to adjust. Or similarly, if the
01:12:20 Speaker 29: province does say we're going all
01:12:22 Speaker 29: to a common platform, and let's
01:12:24 Speaker 29: just say they're going to a
01:12:26 Speaker 29: common software platform in that regard,
01:12:27 Speaker 29: having respect for the costs and
01:12:28 Speaker 29: time it takes to change over
01:12:30 Speaker 29: in that regard. So, if there
01:12:31 Speaker 29: was provincial funding available to help
01:12:33 Speaker 29: with that transition, if there is
01:12:34 Speaker 29: to be a transition, that would
01:12:35 Speaker 29: certainly be appreciated. One of the
01:12:37 Speaker 29: other changes that the province is
01:12:40 Speaker 29: talking about is is consulting through
01:12:43 Speaker 29: the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
01:12:44 Speaker 29: Housing to have a common framework
01:12:46 Speaker 29: or common platform. for official plans.
01:12:47 Speaker 29: Apparently, what what provincial staff and
01:12:50 Speaker 29: and politicians have been hearing is
01:12:54 Speaker 29: that official plans have have gotten
01:12:55 Speaker 29: too large and too unruly and
01:12:57 Speaker 29: too specific in that regard. So
01:12:58 Speaker 29: they'd like to offer some provincial
01:13:00 Speaker 29: guidance there, whereby we might be
01:13:01 Speaker 29: able to have a standard across
01:13:03 Speaker 29: the province. One of the things
01:13:04 Speaker 29: they've shared in the the environmental
01:13:07 Speaker 29: registry posting is what could perhaps
01:13:09 Speaker 29: be a standardized table of contents
01:13:10 Speaker 29: in that regard. Certainly, that's something
01:13:11 Speaker 29: that the Ontario provincial planners and
01:13:12 Speaker 29: The Ontario Professional Planners Institute has
01:13:13 Speaker 29: has been trying to work closely
01:13:15 Speaker 29: with the province on to put
01:13:16 Speaker 29: forward something that would meet the
01:13:19 Speaker 29: needs of the province and address
01:13:21 Speaker 29: the needs of of planners across
01:13:22 Speaker 29: the province. There are some again
01:13:23 Speaker 29: some abilities to streamline in that
01:13:25 Speaker 29: regard. One of the other things
01:13:26 Speaker 29: that the province has has stated
01:13:28 Speaker 29: here is they'd like to see
01:13:30 Speaker 29: official plans being more permissive and
01:13:31 Speaker 29: and and perhaps less overall land
01:13:34 Speaker 29: use designations in that regard within
01:13:36 Speaker 29: those standardized table of contents. We've
01:13:38 Speaker 29: heard comments locally that there's there's
01:13:39 Speaker 29: not specific comments related to either
01:13:42 Speaker 29: health and communities or climate change
01:13:43 Speaker 29: in that regard. Maybe maybe maybe
01:13:45 Speaker 29: those are two topics that are
01:13:48 Speaker 29: just pervasive and and go through,
01:13:49 Speaker 29: you know, all the different sections
01:13:51 Speaker 29: of the plan. But certainly those
01:13:55 Speaker 29: are two very big topics that
01:13:57 Speaker 29: we'd like to see considered in
01:13:59 Speaker 29: that regard. The one other thing
01:14:01 Speaker 29: I'd say here is is that
01:14:03 Speaker 29: one of the other things the
01:14:05 Speaker 29: province is also throwing out as
01:14:07 Speaker 29: part of this potential consultation is
01:14:10 Speaker 29: just a a maximum page limit
01:14:13 Speaker 29: for official plans. and and you
01:14:15 Speaker 29: know you can maybe draw your
01:14:16 Speaker 29: own conclusions on that regard. We
01:14:18 Speaker 29: think you know there's room for
01:14:20 Speaker 29: some standardization, but maybe that page
01:14:22 Speaker 29: limit is is a tough one.
01:14:23 Speaker 29: You know, arguably, and and not
01:14:25 Speaker 29: to pick on anyone here, but
01:14:27 Speaker 29: the town of Hanover official plan
01:14:28 Speaker 29: and the city of Toronto official
01:14:30 Speaker 29: plan probably don't need to be
01:14:32 Speaker 29: the same number of pages. And
01:14:33 Speaker 29: and I don't think specifically a
01:14:36 Speaker 29: number of our great county official
01:14:38 Speaker 29: plans were were sort of you
01:14:41 Speaker 29: know oh unruly in that regard,
01:14:42 Speaker 29: but you know. Fully in that
01:14:44 Speaker 29: regard, but you know we can
01:14:46 Speaker 29: we can sharpen our pencils. One
01:14:48 Speaker 29: of the other things we've worked
01:14:50 Speaker 29: on locally here in terms of
01:14:51 Speaker 29: that streamlining is the fact that
01:14:53 Speaker 29: we are in a two-tier municipal
01:14:54 Speaker 29: government system. Where can we find
01:14:57 Speaker 29: ways not to say things twice?
01:14:58 Speaker 29: And so, if it's already in
01:15:02 Speaker 29: the county plan, you know we
01:15:03 Speaker 29: don't potentially need to restate that
01:15:04 Speaker 29: in a municipal master plan. And
01:15:05 Speaker 29: municipalities have been wonderful at working
01:15:07 Speaker 29: together in that regard. Some of
01:15:09 Speaker 29: the other changes they're looking at
01:15:12 Speaker 29: would be prohibiting the requirement for
01:15:14 Speaker 29: green roof or other roof surfaces
01:15:16 Speaker 29: bylaw. Certainly in the press this.
01:15:18 Speaker 29: has drawn a lot of attention,
01:15:20 Speaker 29: and they've specifically noted the city
01:15:21 Speaker 29: of Toronto's green roof bylaw in
01:15:23 Speaker 29: that regard. We don't have any
01:15:25 Speaker 29: such bylaws like that in place
01:15:27 Speaker 29: in Grey County, and the province
01:15:28 Speaker 29: has specified that they would be
01:15:30 Speaker 29: prohibiting the mandatory use. But if
01:15:32 Speaker 29: developers still wanted to build to
01:15:34 Speaker 29: those those standards, then of course
01:15:37 Speaker 29: they could in that regard. They're
01:15:38 Speaker 29: also looking at making changes to
01:15:41 Speaker 29: the minister's zoning order process, whereby
01:15:43 Speaker 29: they'd no longer need to. be
01:15:46 Speaker 29: passed via regulation, and and so
01:15:47 Speaker 29: the province could could potentially pass
01:15:49 Speaker 29: those in a more expedient fashion.
01:15:50 Speaker 29: For those of you that weren't
01:15:52 Speaker 29: at the Planning and Economic Development
01:15:54 Speaker 29: Advisory Committee, Councillor Nielsen asked a
01:15:57 Speaker 29: wonderful question in that regard that
01:15:58 Speaker 29: I still haven't been able to
01:16:00 Speaker 29: find the answer to. But essentially,
01:16:01 Speaker 29: his his question, if I can
01:16:02 Speaker 29: restate it, was along the lines
01:16:05 Speaker 29: of: If you have a minister's
01:16:07 Speaker 29: zoning order that's in place, and
01:16:09 Speaker 29: and if it gets put in
01:16:10 Speaker 29: place not through regulation, is it?
01:16:12 Speaker 29: easier to then amend if you
01:16:16 Speaker 29: need some local flexibility in that
01:16:17 Speaker 29: regard? And and so you know,
01:16:18 Speaker 29: in terms of the most recent
01:16:21 Speaker 29: minister's zoning orders in the county,
01:16:23 Speaker 29: we had three in Southgate a
01:16:25 Speaker 29: few years ago, and and I
01:16:28 Speaker 29: know there's there's pros and cons
01:16:29 Speaker 29: to those, but one of the
01:16:32 Speaker 29: challenges is once the the minister's
01:16:35 Speaker 29: zoning order is put in place
01:16:37 Speaker 29: by regulation, it's not as simple
01:16:39 Speaker 29: as just amending your zoning bylaw
01:16:41 Speaker 29: anymore through municipal council. Suddenly it
01:16:43 Speaker 29: it it means going back to
01:16:46 Speaker 29: the province in that regard. So.
01:16:48 Speaker 29: one of the the questions here
01:16:50 Speaker 29: that we'd be asking through these
01:16:52 Speaker 29: comments is, if this is enacted,
01:16:53 Speaker 29: no longer needing regulations, would there
01:16:54 Speaker 29: be further flexibility post MZOs being
01:16:56 Speaker 29: in place to look at changes
01:16:57 Speaker 29: in that regard? Speaking of MZOs,
01:17:00 Speaker 29: one of further changes they're looking
01:17:02 Speaker 29: at, and and they talked about
01:17:04 Speaker 29: this back in the spring too,
01:17:05 Speaker 29: is potentially carving out an exception
01:17:07 Speaker 29: such that the minister's decision would
01:17:09 Speaker 29: no longer need to be consistent
01:17:11 Speaker 29: with the provincial planning statement or
01:17:13 Speaker 29: provincial plans in this regard. They
01:17:17 Speaker 29: noted that this would allow the.
01:17:19 Speaker 29: ministry more flexibility to act nimbly
01:17:21 Speaker 29: on minister zoning orders or even
01:17:24 Speaker 29: the approval of official plans. You
01:17:25 Speaker 29: probably guess this didn't land real
01:17:27 Speaker 29: well with the planners. We like
01:17:28 Speaker 29: our rules, and and no doubt
01:17:30 Speaker 29: there needs to be some flexibility.
01:17:33 Speaker 29: But but if if the province
01:17:35 Speaker 29: is is the one sort of
01:17:36 Speaker 29: setting these rules at a provincial
01:17:39 Speaker 29: level through documents like the provincial
01:17:43 Speaker 29: planning statement or provincial plans, then
01:17:45 Speaker 29: it sort of feels like we
01:17:48 Speaker 29: should we should all be singing
01:17:50 Speaker 29: from the same songbook in that
01:17:52 Speaker 29: regard. so staff did have some
01:17:54 Speaker 29: concerns in that regard. There was
01:17:56 Speaker 29: also a change looked at looking
01:17:58 Speaker 29: at reducing the use of record
01:18:01 Speaker 29: reducing the use of records of
01:18:03 Speaker 29: site condition in those situations where
01:18:06 Speaker 29: there's low potential for contamination. In
01:18:10 Speaker 29: terms of some of the other
01:18:13 Speaker 29: changes, again, this is one that
01:18:15 Speaker 29: was was talked about last spring.
01:18:17 Speaker 29: They've talked about regulation making authority
01:18:19 Speaker 29: for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
01:18:21 Speaker 29: and Housing, whereby there could be
01:18:24 Speaker 29: it could reduce the need for
01:18:25 Speaker 29: minor. variances, where someone's looking at
01:18:26 Speaker 29: a variance within a prescribed percentage.
01:18:28 Speaker 29: They've specifically talked about this on
01:18:30 Speaker 29: urban residential lands, but you know,
01:18:32 Speaker 29: one one example could be, you
01:18:35 Speaker 29: know, if your if your front
01:18:36 Speaker 29: yard setback is is six metres
01:18:40 Speaker 29: and and in your bylaw, and
01:18:42 Speaker 29: someone's coming in at you know
01:18:43 Speaker 29: five point eight or something, maybe
01:18:46 Speaker 29: that's within that threshold that it
01:18:48 Speaker 29: could just automatically be approved. I
01:18:50 Speaker 29: think there's pros and cons here.
01:18:51 Speaker 29: You know, there is there is
01:18:52 Speaker 29: some benefit to some flexibility. but
01:18:55 Speaker 29: in some cases those setbacks were
01:18:57 Speaker 29: put in place for a very
01:18:59 Speaker 29: specific reason. Municipally might have to
01:19:00 Speaker 29: do with things like snow storage
01:19:03 Speaker 29: or municipal infrastructure or other such
01:19:07 Speaker 29: things. So the ability to still
01:19:09 Speaker 29: have some municipal say in that
01:19:10 Speaker 29: regard would certainly be be appreciated.
01:19:12 Speaker 29: They've also talked about a new
01:19:13 Speaker 29: section by section review of the
01:19:14 Speaker 29: building code to eliminate in inefficiencies
01:19:17 Speaker 29: while protecting safety. Some of you
01:19:19 Speaker 29: might be aware there were major
01:19:21 Speaker 29: changes to the building. Where there
01:19:24 Speaker 29: were major changes to the building
01:19:27 Speaker 29: code that just took effect earlier
01:19:30 Speaker 29: this year, in terms of talking
01:19:31 Speaker 29: to the few CBOs that we
01:19:33 Speaker 29: did, they noted, you know, again,
01:19:35 Speaker 29: similar to the official plans, there's
01:19:36 Speaker 29: always room for for further streamlining
01:19:39 Speaker 29: and further efficiencies. But with the
01:19:41 Speaker 29: the past direction on on harmonizing
01:19:42 Speaker 29: the provincial and national building codes
01:19:45 Speaker 29: here, it begs the question about
01:19:47 Speaker 29: whether or not this this review
01:19:50 Speaker 29: would be solely focused on looking
01:19:52 Speaker 29: at the province of Ontario, or
01:19:54 Speaker 29: whether this is moving. us closer
01:19:55 Speaker 29: to that stated goal of harmonizing
01:19:57 Speaker 29: the national and provincial building codes
01:20:00 Speaker 29: in that regard, they've also looked
01:20:01 Speaker 29: at more flexible permissions for allowing
01:20:02 Speaker 29: for on-farm septic systems for farm
01:20:04 Speaker 29: worker housing. In that regard, this
01:20:07 Speaker 29: would give greater authority to building
01:20:08 Speaker 29: officials to issue permits for septic
01:20:11 Speaker 29: systems under the building code that
01:20:12 Speaker 29: previously would have required Ministry of
01:20:13 Speaker 29: the Environment approval for. this, on
01:20:14 Speaker 29: the face of it, seems to
01:20:15 Speaker 29: have some merit. But but the
01:20:16 Speaker 29: way they're proposing this right now
01:20:17 Speaker 29: is not necessarily that you'd be
01:20:18 Speaker 29: issuing a permit for a larger
01:20:20 Speaker 29: septic system, but rather you could
01:20:21 Speaker 29: issue permits for a number of
01:20:23 Speaker 29: distributed septic systems across the across
01:20:25 Speaker 29: the farm. So you could have
01:20:28 Speaker 29: up to five ten thousand liter
01:20:30 Speaker 29: systems each on their own ten
01:20:31 Speaker 29: acre or four hectare chunk of
01:20:34 Speaker 29: the farm. And so you know,
01:20:37 Speaker 29: on the one hand, having more
01:20:39 Speaker 29: flexibility for farm work. Having more
01:20:41 Speaker 29: flexibility for farm worker housing, wonderful.
01:20:43 Speaker 29: On the other hand, you know,
01:20:45 Speaker 29: if we were going to have
01:20:47 Speaker 29: development on farm, I think from
01:20:48 Speaker 29: a land use planning perspective, we
01:20:50 Speaker 29: prefer that that development be relatively
01:20:52 Speaker 29: centralized and and not taking say
01:20:54 Speaker 29: farmland out of production at various
01:20:55 Speaker 29: different corners and chunks of the
01:20:59 Speaker 29: farm. So I think that's something
01:21:01 Speaker 29: that we'd like to you know
01:21:03 Speaker 29: submit comments and work with the
01:21:05 Speaker 29: province on to to look at
01:21:08 Speaker 29: some some tweaks there and and
01:21:10 Speaker 29: of course consult further with the
01:21:13 Speaker 29: building. officials in that regard. There's
01:21:14 Speaker 29: also consultations on the further use
01:21:16 Speaker 29: of communal water and wastewater systems.
01:21:19 Speaker 29: Certainly, this is a topic that
01:21:21 Speaker 29: AMO has also been very interested
01:21:24 Speaker 29: in and doing some some work
01:21:26 Speaker 29: there as well. For those of
01:21:27 Speaker 29: you that aren't familiar, when you're
01:21:30 Speaker 29: going beyond five or six units
01:21:32 Speaker 29: on a single system, then it
01:21:36 Speaker 29: becomes a communal system. And under
01:21:38 Speaker 29: the current policies, where you have
01:21:40 Speaker 29: those communal systems, developers aren't necessarily
01:21:42 Speaker 29: required. to build to a municipal
01:21:44 Speaker 29: standard, but prior to approving those
01:21:46 Speaker 29: systems, the municipality needs to enter
01:21:47 Speaker 29: into a responsibility agreement, basically to
01:21:49 Speaker 29: say that if that system ever
01:21:51 Speaker 29: fails, then then they'll be on
01:21:52 Speaker 29: the hook for it. And and
01:21:54 Speaker 29: so you can imagine from a
01:21:56 Speaker 29: municipal risk and liability perspective, they
01:21:59 Speaker 29: don't want to see these systems
01:22:01 Speaker 29: built in a half hazard or
01:22:03 Speaker 29: or lower standard fashion. So you
01:22:07 Speaker 29: know a lot of times the
01:22:10 Speaker 29: municipality will say, yeah, we're fine
01:22:12 Speaker 29: with a communal system as long
01:22:14 Speaker 29: as you build it to a
01:22:16 Speaker 29: municipal standard, and the developer will
01:22:18 Speaker 29: say, there's no way I could
01:22:21 Speaker 29: have. Will say there's no way
01:22:23 Speaker 29: I could ever afford to build
01:22:25 Speaker 29: it to a municipal standard, so
01:22:28 Speaker 29: it simply never gets built or
01:22:31 Speaker 29: or done. So the province is
01:22:33 Speaker 29: looking at streamlined processes for both
01:22:34 Speaker 29: municipal and provincial approvals on those
01:22:35 Speaker 29: communal systems, and this would be
01:22:37 Speaker 29: particularly to unlock development in some
01:22:40 Speaker 29: of our smaller villages and and
01:22:42 Speaker 29: hamlets and rural areas, whereby you
01:22:44 Speaker 29: you wouldn't necessarily have a municipal
01:22:47 Speaker 29: water and wastewater treatment system. This
01:22:48 Speaker 29: isn't meant to replace those those
01:22:49 Speaker 29: treatment systems. It's meant to acknowledge
01:22:50 Speaker 29: the fact that the the financial
01:22:57 Speaker 29: out The financial output to install
01:22:58 Speaker 29: one of those treatment systems is
01:23:00 Speaker 29: is a is a barrier for
01:23:02 Speaker 32: some smaller communities in that regard.
01:23:03 Speaker 32: Similar to our discussion a few
01:23:06 Speaker 32: minutes ago, there's also further changes
01:23:07 Speaker 32: proposed to the development charges that
01:23:09 Speaker 32: would further limit the ability to
01:23:10 Speaker 32: include land costs as part of
01:23:12 Speaker 32: the the collectible development charge. They
01:23:13 Speaker 32: would standardize who pays what in
01:23:17 Speaker 32: terms of infrastructure, and and there's
01:23:18 Speaker 32: further transparency and reporting requirements, including
01:23:20 Speaker 32: the need to share a background
01:23:22 Speaker 32: study where requested by the Ground
01:23:23 Speaker 32: study, we're requested by the ministry,
01:23:24 Speaker 32: and finally, I promise is my
01:23:25 Speaker 32: last point. They're also consulting on
01:23:26 Speaker 32: on the impact of enhanced lot
01:23:28 Speaker 32: level requirements to improve sustainability. And
01:23:29 Speaker 32: essentially, what that means is is
01:23:31 Speaker 32: they want to look at those
01:23:32 Speaker 32: municipal requirements that they believe are
01:23:34 Speaker 32: driving up the cost of housing
01:23:36 Speaker 32: and being applied sporadically across the
01:23:38 Speaker 32: province. And and so, what are
01:23:40 Speaker 32: those areas where we can we
01:23:41 Speaker 32: can all agree that that maybe
01:23:42 Speaker 32: some tools are needed. versus what
01:23:44 Speaker 32: are those other areas whereby maybe
01:23:46 Speaker 32: similar to the city of Toronto's
01:23:47 Speaker 32: green roof programme, it becomes optional
01:23:49 Speaker 32: in that regard. And certainly, again,
01:23:51 Speaker 32: as the county, we want to
01:23:54 Speaker 32: work with the province in this
01:23:56 Speaker 32: regard. Some of what they've thrown
01:23:58 Speaker 32: out in the environmental registry posting
01:24:01 Speaker 32: is is definitely concerning to staff
01:24:02 Speaker 32: in that regard. They've talked about
01:24:04 Speaker 32: things like bicycle parking or requiring
01:24:05 Speaker 32: native planting. To staff, that's not
01:24:08 Speaker 32: something that necessarily adds a tremendous
01:24:10 Speaker 32: amount. to a developer's performance in
01:24:13 Speaker 32: that regard, but it's it's it's
01:24:16 Speaker 32: things that we've had enshrined in
01:24:18 Speaker 32: in both zoning bylaws in the
01:24:20 Speaker 32: case of bicycle parking and and
01:24:23 Speaker 32: native planting requirements in our subdivision
01:24:24 Speaker 32: and site plan agreements for for
01:24:26 Speaker 32: many many years now, and and
01:24:28 Speaker 32: it's it's not a tool that
01:24:29 Speaker 32: we'd we'd like to lose in
01:24:32 Speaker 32: that regard. So again, you know,
01:24:34 Speaker 32: I think there's room for some
01:24:35 Speaker 32: scoping here, but from a staff
01:24:39 Speaker 32: perspective, and particularly in terms of
01:24:40 Speaker 32: looking at our longer-term sustainable. future
01:24:42 Speaker 32: in that regard, some of these
01:24:43 Speaker 32: tools are very useful without without
01:24:44 Speaker 32: you know unduly harming development in
01:24:47 Speaker 32: that regard. So with that, I
01:24:49 Speaker 32: will turn it over to
01:24:51 Speaker 32: Niall, who's going to speak to
01:24:53 Speaker 32: some of the transportation elements. Thank
01:24:55 Speaker 32: you very much, and to you,
01:24:58 Speaker 32: Deputy Warden. I told myself I
01:24:59 Speaker 32: should never follow Scott when it
01:25:01 Speaker 32: comes to doing a presentation. I
01:25:03 Speaker 32: will be this relatively relatively brief
01:25:05 Speaker 32: as we go over the next
01:25:07 Speaker 32: few slides. Pat, I. know was
01:25:10 Speaker 32: desperately keen to be here today,
01:25:12 Speaker 32: but was unfortunately unable to attend.
01:25:14 Speaker 32: So I, you have me instead.
01:25:16 Speaker 32: So I'm backup, Pat. Transportation is
01:25:18 Speaker 32: one of the pieces that's bubbled
01:25:20 Speaker 32: up through through Bill 60, and
01:25:21 Speaker 32: I think the story for a
01:25:22 Speaker 32: lot of the transportation elements in
01:25:24 Speaker 32: there is we don't really understand
01:25:25 Speaker 32: the problem that the province is
01:25:27 Speaker 32: trying to fix for some of
01:25:30 Speaker 32: these. I think it'll be clear
01:25:32 Speaker 32: on the third one of these
01:25:33 Speaker 32: slides that we we know where
01:25:34 Speaker 32: the problem is, but certainly for
01:25:35 Speaker 32: some of these, we're not entirely
01:25:38 Speaker 32: sure the the rationale behind why
01:25:40 Speaker 32: the province is seeking. Mind why
01:25:41 Speaker 32: the province is seeking to move
01:25:43 Speaker 32: some of these forward, and so
01:25:44 Speaker 32: we don't have much detail around
01:25:46 Speaker 32: what the potential outcome of some
01:25:48 Speaker 32: of these changes could be, or
01:25:51 Speaker 32: as I say, the reasons perhaps
01:25:53 Speaker 32: that they're driving at some of
01:25:55 Speaker 32: these things. So the first one
01:25:57 Speaker 32: that's in Bill 60 is harmonisation
01:25:59 Speaker 32: of road standards. This is an
01:26:00 Speaker 32: interesting one because we already have
01:26:01 Speaker 32: technical guidelines which are well adopted
01:26:02 Speaker 32: and have an extensive history across
01:26:04 Speaker 32: the province in terms of how
01:26:06 Speaker 32: roads are constructed. They're used by
01:26:07 Speaker 32: the counties' teams. They're used by
01:26:09 Speaker 32: municipal teams. across Grey County, and
01:26:15 Speaker 32: they they are the OPSS and
01:26:16 Speaker 32: the the OPSD standards, which are
01:26:18 Speaker 32: already used when we're creating road
01:26:21 Speaker 32: standards for for consultants and contractors
01:26:23 Speaker 32: to be doing. So they're they're
01:26:25 Speaker 32: commonly adopted standards across the engineering
01:26:28 Speaker 32: profession that are already in place,
01:26:29 Speaker 32: and so we're not entirely sure
01:26:30 Speaker 32: what the harmonisation beyond those
01:26:32 Speaker 32: might be. It might be focusing
01:26:35 Speaker 32: on those standards, it might be
01:26:37 Speaker 32: introducing new standards or refining the
01:26:38 Speaker 32: scope of those standards and bringing
01:26:40 Speaker 32: them in. Standards and bringing them
01:26:42 Speaker 32: into a provincial legislative context, we
01:26:45 Speaker 32: would suggest some caution needs to
01:26:47 Speaker 32: be applied to this. We like
01:26:48 Speaker 32: the flexibility to build roads as
01:26:51 Speaker 32: roads need to be built for
01:26:53 Speaker 32: the positions that they're in, and
01:26:56 Speaker 32: those conditions obviously vary widely across
01:26:57 Speaker 32: Great County, across our member municipalities.
01:26:58 Speaker 32: More significantly, they vary very significantly
01:27:01 Speaker 32: across the province of Ontario, and
01:27:02 Speaker 32: so it's difficult to difficult to
01:27:03 Speaker 32: understand what harmonisation of a road
01:27:05 Speaker 32: standard could be that is applicable
01:27:07 Speaker 32: to the far north as it
01:27:08 Speaker 32: is to. urban Toronto, and so
01:27:10 Speaker 32: some concern around what harmonisation could
01:27:12 Speaker 32: look like in that side of
01:27:13 Speaker 32: things. We already use a number
01:27:16 Speaker 32: of different standards to adopt to
01:27:17 Speaker 32: the drainage conditions, the soil conditions,
01:27:19 Speaker 32: the ground conditions of the various
01:27:20 Speaker 32: different roads that we look after,
01:27:23 Speaker 32: and so if that's something that
01:27:27 Speaker 32: we're looking after in a scale
01:27:29 Speaker 32: of a county, again, looking at
01:27:33 Speaker 32: what that would look like over
01:27:35 Speaker 32: a much broader area is something
01:27:37 Speaker 32: which would take some significant attention
01:27:40 Speaker 32: to, and also the. ability of
01:27:42 Speaker 32: contractors to be able to respond
01:27:43 Speaker 32: to this. So we work with
01:27:46 Speaker 32: a number of contractors who use
01:27:47 Speaker 32: a number of different asphalt plants.
01:27:49 Speaker 32: We specify the mixes that we
01:27:50 Speaker 32: require to meet our local conditions.
01:27:52 Speaker 32: And again, if this is harmonised
01:27:54 Speaker 32: across the province, what does that
01:27:56 Speaker 32: do from a contractor's perspective in
01:27:57 Speaker 32: regards to materials that we have?
01:27:59 Speaker 32: We have access to. The early
01:28:00 Speaker 32: indications on the harmonisation suggest that
01:28:02 Speaker 32: there are some savings that could
01:28:02 Speaker 32: be leveraged through this. We're not
01:28:04 Speaker 32: able to see where those savings
01:28:05 Speaker 32: potentially could be gained. at this
01:28:07 Speaker 32: point in time, and so really
01:28:08 Speaker 32: this is a bit of a
01:28:12 Speaker 32: story of we really do need
01:28:15 Speaker 32: a lot more information before we
01:28:17 Speaker 32: can come to a position of
01:28:20 Speaker 32: whether or not harmonisation is something
01:28:22 Speaker 32: which should be welcomed or or
01:28:24 Speaker 32: express some concern about. There are
01:28:26 Speaker 32: a couple of things that give
01:28:28 Speaker 32: us some cause for concern, specifically
01:28:29 Speaker 32: in regards to ministers being able
01:28:31 Speaker 32: to make regulations regarding municipalities and
01:28:32 Speaker 32: the contracts that we enter into
01:28:33 Speaker 32: and standardising some of those. This.
01:28:35 Speaker 32: this does appear to be an
01:28:36 Speaker 32: extra layer. We have a well-developed
01:28:38 Speaker 32: procurement process at Great County. Our
01:28:40 Speaker 32: member municipalities have their own procurement
01:28:42 Speaker 32: processes that we have in place.
01:28:45 Speaker 32: We have contractors that we've had
01:28:46 Speaker 32: relationships with over many years, and
01:28:47 Speaker 32: we welcome new contractors through through
01:28:49 Speaker 32: procurement process each year. This appears
01:28:51 Speaker 32: to be an extra layer that
01:28:55 Speaker 32: we don't understand the necessity for
01:28:58 Speaker 32: with the with the the procurement
01:29:00 Speaker 32: processes that we have in place
01:29:01 Speaker 32: at this time, and and the
01:29:03 Speaker 32: contracts that we're able to form
01:29:05 Speaker 32: in. Contracts that we're able to
01:29:06 Speaker 32: form into. Now, this appears to
01:29:08 Speaker 32: be something that wouldn't have any
01:29:10 Speaker 32: merit for us at the way
01:29:11 Speaker 32: we operate at this point in
01:29:13 Speaker 32: time. So, again, not quite sure
01:29:14 Speaker 32: why this is coming forward. Not
01:29:17 Speaker 32: quite sure what the value would
01:29:18 Speaker 32: be in terms of grey counting.
01:29:20 Speaker 32: I think we probably can guess
01:29:21 Speaker 32: where this one is coming from
01:29:22 Speaker 32: in terms of a provincial lens.
01:29:24 Speaker 32: Not something which has a massive
01:29:27 Speaker 32: impact on us on the surface
01:29:39 Speaker 33: in regards to the way in
01:29:40 Speaker 33: which we design our roads and
01:29:41 Speaker 34: the the requirement to not.
01:29:43 Speaker 35: eliminate travel lanes for traffic, to
01:29:45 Speaker 35: make active transportation lanes for cycling
01:29:46 Speaker 35: infrastructure. However, the the guidelines that
01:29:47 Speaker 35: we operate under allow for us
01:29:50 Speaker 35: to look at road design on
01:29:52 Speaker 35: an as needed basis. And so,
01:29:54 Speaker 35: the the inference of this this
01:29:56 Speaker 35: sort of regulation within Bill sixty,
01:29:58 Speaker 35: this this element of Bill sixty
01:30:00 Speaker 35: would be to limit or restrict
01:30:01 Speaker 35: the ability of the municipality to
01:30:04 Speaker 35: design a road as it's needed
01:30:07 Speaker 35: for the area it is in.
01:30:10 Speaker 35: And so, at times. as you'll
01:30:12 Speaker 35: see on the slide, putting a
01:30:14 Speaker 35: road on a diet is a
01:30:15 Speaker 35: good thing to do. The use
01:30:17 Speaker 35: of that road may have changed.
01:30:19 Speaker 35: The desire for the need of
01:30:21 Speaker 35: the use of that road may
01:30:23 Speaker 35: have changed over times. It may
01:30:25 Speaker 35: not be that we specifically wish
01:30:28 Speaker 35: to introduce a cycling rain lane,
01:30:29 Speaker 35: but it might be that there's
01:30:32 Speaker 35: more space required for active active
01:30:34 Speaker 35: transportation infrastructure to support pedestrians. It
01:30:36 Speaker 35: might be that we're looking to
01:30:37 Speaker 35: amend turning lanes, reduce or increase
01:30:40 Speaker 35: road lane widths, and so the.
01:30:43 Speaker 35: scope of this legislative change that's
01:30:45 Speaker 35: being proposed in in Bill 60,
01:30:47 Speaker 35: if it's defined very much to
01:30:51 Speaker 35: just cycling infrastructure, might not be
01:30:54 Speaker 35: something that has a big impact.
01:30:55 Speaker 35: But there is some concern that
01:30:57 Speaker 35: the way in which this is
01:31:00 Speaker 35: worded would restrict the ability of
01:31:05 Speaker 35: a municipality to be able to
01:31:06 Speaker 35: design a road for the best
01:31:08 Speaker 35: situation, the best design for the
01:31:11 Speaker 35: circumstances and situation that we we
01:31:11 Speaker 35: have the road in. And that
01:31:13 Speaker 35: takes me to the last slide,
01:31:16 Speaker 35: where we can offer a little
01:31:18 Speaker 35: bit of a glimpse into some
01:31:21 Speaker 35: good news stuff. So the the
01:31:23 Speaker 35: ability to reduce some of the
01:31:24 Speaker 35: waste times regarding working eligibility criteria
01:31:25 Speaker 35: is something that we we generally
01:31:27 Speaker 35: support. It's not specific to transportation,
01:31:28 Speaker 35: but it is something which across
01:31:30 Speaker 35: the board would be something that
01:31:32 Speaker 35: would be generally supported. And and
01:31:34 Speaker 35: looking at the LEAN Act is
01:31:36 Speaker 35: something that we're we're always interested
01:31:38 Speaker 35: in. However, we would we would
01:31:40 Speaker 35: caveat this with we don't want
01:31:41 Speaker 35: more paperwork on terms of this
01:31:43 Speaker 35: one. This one works reasonably well
01:31:45 Speaker 35: as is, and so so again
01:31:47 Speaker 35: no need for more paperwork when
01:31:49 Speaker 35: it comes to the LEANS. More
01:31:51 Speaker 35: paperwork when it comes to the
01:31:54 Speaker 35: leaves, and I will wrap up
01:31:55 Speaker 35: at that. And hopefully, there will
01:31:57 Speaker 35: be no questions. If there are,
01:31:58 Speaker 35: Mister Taylor would be happy to
01:31:59 Speaker 35: take them. Thank you, Scott and
01:32:01 Speaker 35: Nile. Sherry, thank you. I wanted
01:32:02 Speaker 35: to start with just a little
01:32:03 Speaker 35: bit of background information on the
01:32:05 Speaker 35: landlord-tenant board and the Residential Tenancies
01:32:08 Speaker 35: Act. For those of you who
01:32:09 Speaker 35: don't live and breathe the legislation
01:32:12 Speaker 35: like we do. in housing, the
01:32:13 Speaker 35: landlord-tenant board is one of thirteen
01:32:16 Speaker 35: Ontario adjudicative tribunals. It is the
01:32:18 Speaker 35: busiest of all of the tribunals
01:32:20 Speaker 35: in Ontario, and it is acting
01:32:22 Speaker 35: on the authority under the Residential
01:32:24 Speaker 35: Tenancies Act. And that is the
01:32:25 Speaker 35: piece of legislation that makes the
01:32:27 Speaker 35: framework of relationships between landlords and
01:32:28 Speaker 35: tenants. They receive approximately, on average,
01:32:30 Speaker 35: eighty-one thousand applications in a calendar
01:32:32 Speaker 35: year, which means that they would
01:32:34 Speaker 35: have to hear three hundred tribunals
01:32:36 Speaker 35: a day in. order to be
01:32:39 Speaker 35: able to keep up with the
01:32:41 Speaker 35: the amount of tribunals that they
01:32:43 Speaker 35: have. Approximately twenty percent of those
01:32:44 Speaker 35: tribunals are withdrawn ahead of time.
01:32:46 Speaker 35: Eleven percent are mediated, and the
01:32:47 Speaker 35: rest go in front of an
01:32:50 Speaker 35: adjudicator. The adjudicator is a role
01:32:52 Speaker 35: in Ontario that is allowed and
01:32:54 Speaker 35: under the authority of the Residential
01:32:55 Speaker 35: Tenancies Act to be the only
01:32:57 Speaker 35: person to legally terminate a tenancy
01:32:58 Speaker 35: in Ontario and issue an order
01:33:01 Speaker 35: of eviction. The sheriff position is.
01:33:03 Speaker 35: the only position in Ontario that
01:33:05 Speaker 35: can execute that order. So, Bill
01:33:06 Speaker 35: sixty has proposed a few changes
01:33:07 Speaker 35: legislatively in order to try and
01:33:10 Speaker 35: help the landlord and tenant board
01:33:12 Speaker 35: to catch up on their their
01:33:14 Speaker 35: backlog, as well as incentivize incentivize
01:33:17 Speaker 35: would be landlords who are sitting
01:33:18 Speaker 35: on vacant properties to try and
01:33:21 Speaker 35: have confidence in the system and
01:33:24 Speaker 35: rent out those properties. We agree
01:33:27 Speaker 35: with some of the things that
01:33:29 Speaker 35: they've put forward. we are very
01:33:30 Speaker 35: concerned about others, and so we
01:33:32 Speaker 35: are looking at this from a
01:33:33 Speaker 35: very balanced perspective. So the first
01:33:34 Speaker 35: change that they're proposing is to
01:33:35 Speaker 35: reduce the amount of time that
01:33:37 Speaker 35: parties have to request a review
01:33:38 Speaker 35: of an order to the landlord-tenant
01:33:40 Speaker 35: board from thirty to fifty day
01:33:43 Speaker 35: or fifteen days. So what that
01:33:44 Speaker 35: is is if there is a
01:33:46 Speaker 35: critical error to your order. So
01:33:47 Speaker 35: for example, a landlord receives an
01:33:49 Speaker 35: order for eviction, but they whoever
01:33:50 Speaker 35: typed it out put the wrong
01:33:52 Speaker 35: unit number, and they don't. appeal
01:33:53 Speaker 35: that within 15 days, they could
01:33:56 Speaker 35: face starting over at the at
01:33:58 Speaker 35: the beginning. If a tenant receives
01:34:00 Speaker 35: a notice of eviction for rental
01:34:02 Speaker 35: arrears, and the math is incorrect,
01:34:04 Speaker 35: again, if they don't catch it
01:34:07 Speaker 35: within the 15 days, it could
01:34:08 Speaker 35: end up going to an appeal
01:34:09 Speaker 35: process. So on paper, it does
01:34:10 Speaker 35: look as though this may shorten
01:34:12 Speaker 35: time, but what it will really
01:34:13 Speaker 35: do is open the door to
01:34:15 Speaker 35: more appeals and more landlords having
01:34:17 Speaker 35: to start from scratch, limiting new
01:34:21 Speaker 35: issues that can be raised at
01:34:22 Speaker 35: the time of a landlord-tenant. board
01:34:25 Speaker 35: hearing, that is something that is
01:34:27 Speaker 35: allowed to happen for evictions that
01:34:30 Speaker 35: are happening for non-payment of rent.
01:34:32 Speaker 35: And what the province is saying
01:34:33 Speaker 35: is that they will allow tenants
01:34:37 Speaker 35: to bring forward any of their
01:34:40 Speaker 35: maintenance concerns if the tenant pays
01:34:43 Speaker 35: 50% of the rental arrears up
01:34:46 Speaker 35: front. And what that's going to
01:34:47 Speaker 35: do is it's going to create
01:34:49 Speaker 35: a two-tier system between the haves
01:34:51 Speaker 35: and the have-nots. It'll put additional
01:34:55 Speaker 35: strain on some of our most
01:34:57 Speaker 35: vulnerable populations. What it is intended
01:34:59 Speaker 35: to do is. equalize the playing
01:35:00 Speaker 35: field. So right now, as a
01:35:01 Speaker 35: landlord, if we go to tribunal,
01:35:03 Speaker 35: which is what we are as
01:35:04 Speaker 35: as Gray County Housing, we follow
01:35:07 Speaker 35: the same rules and legislations as
01:35:10 Speaker 35: any other landlord. A tenant can
01:35:11 Speaker 35: bring forward maintenance concerns without any
01:35:12 Speaker 35: advance notice to us, and then
01:35:17 Speaker 35: we don't have time to prepare
01:35:20 Speaker 35: a defence, and so we ask
01:35:23 Speaker 35: for an adjournment, which causes delays.
01:35:25 Speaker 35: When you are going to tribunal
01:35:27 Speaker 35: for a behavioural issue, all parties
01:35:30 Speaker 35: are expected to prepare their evidence
01:35:32 Speaker 35: and bring forward what it is
01:35:33 Speaker 35: that they're going. to discuss seven
01:35:34 Speaker 35: days in advance. So we would
01:35:35 Speaker 35: propose that that same rule would
01:35:37 Speaker 35: apply to non-payment of rent hearings
01:35:40 Speaker 35: to equalize the playing field and
01:35:43 Speaker 35: ensure that everybody has an opportunity
01:35:45 Speaker 35: to bring forward their concerns. Shortening
01:35:48 Speaker 35: the rental arrears eviction notice from
01:35:49 Speaker 35: fourteen to seven days again looks
01:35:51 Speaker 35: good on paper, but won't make
01:35:52 Speaker 35: a hair of difference if the
01:35:54 Speaker 35: procedural issues that are happening at
01:35:56 Speaker 35: the landlord-tenant board are not corrected,
01:35:57 Speaker 35: and if we go to get
01:35:59 Speaker 35: a sheriff and we don't have
01:36:00 Speaker 35: one, which has happened a number
01:36:02 Speaker 35: of times in the last three
01:36:03 Speaker 35: years in Gray County. We've had
01:36:06 Speaker 35: sheriffs that are go off for
01:36:07 Speaker 35: various reasons, and then we have
01:36:09 Speaker 35: to borrow from other regions, which
01:36:09 Speaker 35: means our sheriff is only available
01:36:15 Speaker 35: to us maybe once or twice
01:36:19 Speaker 35: a month. So again, you could
01:36:21 Speaker 35: have an order in hand, but
01:36:23 Speaker 35: then not be able to execute
01:36:24 Speaker 35: it. Creating authority to set out
01:36:26 Speaker 35: circumstances or conditions for a set
01:36:28 Speaker 35: aside. So a set aside is
01:36:31 Speaker 35: essentially a request for a second
01:36:35 Speaker 35: hearing, and we agree. that sometimes
01:36:36 Speaker 35: this gets abused. Sometimes tenants will
01:36:39 Speaker 35: say that they didn't know that
01:36:41 Speaker 35: there was a hearing, and so
01:36:44 Speaker 35: they will request a second one,
01:36:45 Speaker 35: and it will be granted. And
01:36:47 Speaker 35: we agree that there needs to
01:36:49 Speaker 35: be more transparency and more consistency
01:36:52 Speaker 35: as to when those are are
01:36:54 Speaker 35: implemented, because right now there's no
01:36:55 Speaker 35: real rhyme or reason from our
01:36:58 Speaker 35: perspective as to why one adjudicator
01:37:00 Speaker 35: will say yes and another adjudicator
01:37:01 Speaker 35: will say no. We also think
01:37:03 Speaker 35: though that before this would be
01:37:04 Speaker 35: implemented. It needs to be done
01:37:05 Speaker 35: with deep collabouration with landlord landlord
01:37:06 Speaker 35: groups, tenant groups, and municipalities. Because
01:37:08 Speaker 35: if any of this legislation fails,
01:37:09 Speaker 35: sitting next to Josh, I will
01:37:10 Speaker 35: hear all about how the sustainable
01:37:12 Speaker 35: housing benefit and the short-term shelter
01:37:14 Speaker 35: programme has to pick up where
01:37:16 Speaker 35: this leaves us. Increasing enforcement resources,
01:37:19 Speaker 35: we are absolutely for this. That
01:37:22 Speaker 35: would mean hiring more sheriffs, and
01:37:25 Speaker 35: we will advocate that Gray County
01:37:27 Speaker 35: will be one. of the ones
01:37:30 Speaker 35: to get a sheriff, and advocating
01:37:33 Speaker 35: that these will be permanent positions
01:37:35 Speaker 35: and not temporary ones. Increasing access
01:37:37 Speaker 35: to decisions or orders. I must
01:37:40 Speaker 35: say I'm a little bit confused
01:37:42 Speaker 35: by this one because you already
01:37:43 Speaker 35: can access orders, landlords, anybody. They're
01:37:45 Speaker 35: they're public information. Anyone can attend
01:37:46 Speaker 35: a tribunal. In fact, any landlord
01:37:47 Speaker 35: should in order to learn the
01:37:49 Speaker 35: nuances of being in a tribunal,
01:37:51 Speaker 35: and anyone can Google and. search
01:37:54 Speaker 35: up orders? They're they're public knowledge,
01:37:55 Speaker 35: so I'm not really sure what
01:37:59 Speaker 35: that is, other than making the
01:38:02 Speaker 35: public aware that they can do
01:38:03 Speaker 35: something that's already available to them.
01:38:04 Speaker 35: Simplified language in the LTV documents.
01:38:06 Speaker 35: We agree that they do need
01:38:11 Speaker 35: to be simplified. However, the landlord-tenant
01:38:13 Speaker 35: board also just revamped their website
01:38:15 Speaker 35: and made it much more confusing.
01:38:19 Speaker 35: So we're not really sure how
01:38:20 Speaker 35: well of a job they're going
01:38:21 Speaker 35: to do with their forms. The
01:38:26 Speaker 35: forms do cause a lot of
01:38:29 Speaker 35: confusion as they are right now,
01:38:30 Speaker 35: and in both. Right now, and
01:38:32 Speaker 35: in big bold letters across the
01:38:33 Speaker 35: front of the page, there's a
01:38:36 Speaker 35: statement that says something along the
01:38:37 Speaker 35: lines of this form could lead
01:38:39 Speaker 35: you to eviction, and nobody ever
01:38:41 Speaker 35: reads the second page with the
01:38:44 Speaker 35: fine print as to what they
01:38:46 Speaker 35: need to do next. And I
01:38:49 Speaker 35: cannot change the slide. You able
01:38:52 Speaker 35: to change slide? There we
01:38:56 Speaker 35: go. So they want to create
01:38:58 Speaker 35: authority to consider factors and limits
01:38:59 Speaker 35: under which an adjudicator can consider
01:39:02 Speaker 35: postponing an eviction. This. Funding and
01:39:05 Speaker 35: eviction. This usually is a human
01:39:07 Speaker 35: rights matter. Part of the legislation
01:39:09 Speaker 35: that is impacting landlords at the
01:39:12 Speaker 35: LTB is lack of knowledge of
01:39:14 Speaker 35: human rights legislation. We are expected
01:39:16 Speaker 35: to know and understand our responsibilities
01:39:17 Speaker 35: under the Human Rights Act as
01:39:20 Speaker 35: well. And so, what this would
01:39:22 Speaker 35: do is, we do agree again
01:39:25 Speaker 35: that there's inconsistency. It seems that
01:39:27 Speaker 35: the adjudicator you get will determine
01:39:32 Speaker 35: what they will take into consideration
01:39:33 Speaker 35: and what they won't. So these
01:39:34 Speaker 35: are usually compassionate reasons. So this
01:39:37 Speaker 35: is where a landlord gets the
01:39:39 Speaker 35: eviction, but they won't tell the
01:39:42 Speaker 35: person they have to be out
01:39:44 Speaker 35: within days. They'll tell the person
01:39:48 Speaker 36: they have to be out within
01:39:52 Speaker 36: maybe two or three months, and
01:39:55 Speaker 36: it could be because of illness.
01:39:57 Speaker 36: It could be because of kids
01:40:00 Speaker 36: wrapping up school. It could be
01:40:02 Speaker 36: because of a number of
01:40:04 Speaker 36: of different compassionate type reasons. So
01:40:08 Speaker 36: we agree there needs to be
01:40:09 Speaker 36: clarity and consistency, but again with
01:40:18 Speaker 36: some really deep consultation with municipalities
01:40:19 Speaker 36: and landlord and tenant groups. They
01:40:21 Speaker 36: are. looking at removing compensation requirements
01:40:24 Speaker 36: for landlords' own use evictions, and
01:40:28 Speaker 36: no longer needed where the landlord
01:40:30 Speaker 32: gives 120 days' notice. We are
01:40:32 Speaker 32: against this. This doesn't affect us
01:40:33 Speaker 32: as Gray County Housing. However, when
01:40:34 Speaker 32: a tenant is evicted for own
01:40:35 Speaker 32: use, they're being evicted for no
01:40:36 Speaker 32: fault of their own. They're often
01:40:39 Speaker 32: having to move into housing that
01:40:40 Speaker 32: is more expensive than the housing
01:40:42 Speaker 32: that they're leaving, and they have
01:40:44 Speaker 32: to incur cost of moving. So
01:40:44 Speaker 32: we think it's only fair. that
01:40:47 Speaker 32: they receive some sort of restitution
01:40:50 Speaker 32: to help them with that process.
01:40:53 Speaker 32: And consulting on alternative options for
01:40:55 Speaker 37: when lease agreements expire, the government
01:40:57 Speaker 37: has since noted that they will
01:41:00 Speaker 37: not be pursuing this, and we're
01:41:03 Speaker 37: in support of that. So tribunals
01:41:06 Speaker 37: are equipped and expected to make
01:41:07 Speaker 37: decisions that have real impact in
01:41:09 Speaker 37: people's lives, and we agree and
01:41:11 Speaker 37: advocate that those those decisions should
01:41:14 Speaker 37: be fair, and they should be
01:41:16 Speaker 37: trans. Fair and they should be
01:41:20 Speaker 37: transparent and they should be consistent.
01:41:23 Speaker 37: And the the ombudsman's office did
01:41:26 Speaker 37: a report. I'm not sure how
01:41:29 Speaker 37: many of you are aware of
01:41:32 Speaker 37: that, but in 2018 was when
01:41:36 Speaker 37: the issues with the LTV began.
01:41:38 Speaker 37: And it in 2018 there was
01:41:42 Speaker 37: a large number of complaints that
01:41:45 Speaker 37: went to the ombudsman's office. In
01:41:46 Speaker 37: the beginning of 2019, right before
01:41:48 Speaker 37: COVID, they launched an investigation. Then
01:41:53 Speaker 37: there were two rental moratoriums during
01:41:54 Speaker 37: COVID, which exacerbated the issues. The
01:41:59 Speaker 37: ombudsman's office has put forward 61
01:42:01 Speaker 37: recommendations, procedural recommendations, to clean up
01:42:03 Speaker 37: the consistencies or lack thereof within
01:42:05 Speaker 35: the board and the decisions that
01:42:07 Speaker 35: they make. And the LTB has
01:42:10 Speaker 35: to respond to the ombudsman's office
01:42:12 Speaker 35: every six months with updates as
01:42:14 Speaker 35: to how they're doing. We are
01:42:16 Speaker 35: in support of chasing that process.
01:42:19 Speaker 35: As when you read the report,
01:42:21 Speaker 35: you can see that a lot
01:42:23 Speaker 35: of the recommendations that are made.
01:42:26 Speaker 35: are direct reflections of the experiences
01:42:27 Speaker 35: we're having. I'd be happy to
01:42:29 Speaker 35: take any questions. Thank you, Sharon.
01:42:31 Speaker 35: Are there any questions from Council?
01:42:32 Speaker 35: Councillor Gray. Two questions. Ms. Irwin
01:42:35 Speaker 35: did a great job, but my
01:42:36 Speaker 35: first question is going to circle
01:42:38 Speaker 35: back to Nile. I did have
01:42:40 Speaker 35: one question, and then a follow-up
01:42:42 Speaker 35: for Sharon. A couple years ago,
01:42:45 Speaker 35: I believe it was Sudbury was.
01:42:47 Speaker 35: named under joint and several liability
01:42:48 Speaker 35: as part of construction project accident
01:42:50 Speaker 35: on site, and this caused municipalities
01:42:52 Speaker 35: a tremendous amount of grief. Within
01:42:56 Speaker 35: the changes proposed in the Highway
01:42:58 Speaker 35: Traffic Act component, is there any
01:43:00 Speaker 35: recognition to supporting municipalities' positions, which
01:43:03 Speaker 35: were an outcome of that and
01:43:04 Speaker 36: the extra responsibilities and costs that
01:43:06 Speaker 36: were sustained? Can I get back
01:43:08 Speaker 36: to you on that one, so
01:43:10 Speaker 36: you, Deputy Warden? I am aware
01:43:13 Speaker 36: of the aware of the situation
01:43:14 Speaker 36: in Sudbury. I had I had
01:43:15 Speaker 36: a recollection that had been dealt
01:43:17 Speaker 36: with in another piece of legislation
01:43:19 Speaker 36: that had happened, but I need
01:43:23 Speaker 36: I would need to circle back
01:43:24 Speaker 36: with Eagle to get an answer
01:43:26 Speaker 36: to you. I will get back
01:43:29 Speaker 36: to you. Okay, thank you, Neil.
01:43:30 Speaker 36: Did you have another question? Go
01:43:33 Speaker 35: ahead. Thank you, and the. slide
01:43:35 Speaker 35: has went past me. It could
01:43:36 Speaker 35: have been the second last slide
01:43:38 Speaker 35: or the the last slide. The
01:43:40 Speaker 35: 120 days notice for own use.
01:43:41 Speaker 35: Sharon, you mentioned it doesn't really
01:43:45 Speaker 35: apply. I think to the county
01:43:49 Speaker 35: was your comment. But we were
01:43:51 Speaker 35: going to submit comments opposed to
01:43:53 Speaker 35: that. And I'm question further why
01:43:55 Speaker 35: we would submit comments opposed to
01:43:57 Speaker 35: that. I think of a an
01:43:59 Speaker 35: individual, a family who might have
01:44:01 Speaker 35: a semi-detached. They're renting out. the
01:44:05 Speaker 35: other unit in their semi-detached, and
01:44:08 Speaker 38: a family member loses a job.
01:44:11 Speaker 38: They own the building. They should
01:44:13 Speaker 38: have some significant rights about who's
01:44:15 Speaker 38: going to occupy that building. And
01:44:19 Speaker 38: I'm I'm wondering what is it
01:44:21 Speaker 38: further here that the county should
01:44:24 Speaker 38: be positioning as communication to further
01:44:27 Speaker 38: support that individual because I I
01:44:28 Speaker 38: know where that any monetary. But
01:44:31 Speaker 38: any monetary remuneration, I know where
01:44:35 Speaker 38: it's coming from. It's coming from
01:44:36 Speaker 38: the person who owns that building,
01:44:39 Speaker 38: that duplex. What are we looking
01:44:41 Speaker 38: for further here? That when we're
01:44:43 Speaker 29: not actually players in the game.
01:44:45 Speaker 29: And so, through you, chair, we're
01:44:47 Speaker 29: looking at it because we sit
01:44:50 Speaker 29: on sort of a threshold of
01:44:53 Speaker 29: both the landlord for Gray County
01:44:55 Speaker 29: Community Housing. We also operate. programmemes
01:44:56 Speaker 29: such as the Sustainable Housing Benefit,
01:44:57 Speaker 29: which will have a trickle-down effect
01:45:01 Speaker 29: on those types of programmemes for
01:45:03 Speaker 29: moving costs and last month's rent.
01:45:05 Speaker 29: So we're looking at it as
01:45:09 Speaker 29: as a full picture of protecting
01:45:11 Speaker 29: the tenants from having to come
01:45:15 Speaker 29: and access resources when it is
01:45:18 Speaker 29: of no fault of their own
01:45:21 Speaker 29: that they're being evicted. Not to
01:45:23 Speaker 29: say that I disagree with you.
01:45:25 Speaker 29: Absolutely, if a person owns a
01:45:27 Speaker 29: property and and they're entitled to
01:45:30 Speaker 29: move into it and have that
01:45:33 Speaker 29: eviction 100. That eviction, one hundred
01:45:34 Speaker 29: percent. Our argument is that to
01:45:36 Speaker 29: protect additional resources having to
01:45:42 Speaker 29: pick up the slack, because it
01:45:44 Speaker 29: is a no fault eviction, and
01:45:48 Speaker 29: because it will incur costs on
01:45:49 Speaker 39: the person who's having to move,
01:45:52 Speaker 39: we feel that it should be
01:45:55 Speaker 39: there should still be a monetary
01:45:56 Speaker 39: tie. So, can we construct a
01:45:59 Speaker 39: correlation to increasing supply in the
01:46:02 Speaker 39: marketplace because that's a significant driver,
01:46:05 Speaker 39: and that's been the problem in
01:46:09 Speaker 39: the last several years? Is there's
01:46:11 Speaker 39: been no supply, so if if
01:46:13 Speaker 39: we can get back to a
01:46:17 Speaker 39: supply ratio of eight or ten
01:46:19 Speaker 39: percent vacant market units, then
01:46:22 Speaker 39: we're going to see those prices
01:46:25 Speaker 39: come down, and we're going to
01:46:27 Speaker 39: see relief corporately then, potentially in
01:46:30 Speaker 39: those those rents as well. And
01:46:33 Speaker 39: through you, chair, I don't disagree
01:46:36 Speaker 39: at all. I think that we
01:46:39 Speaker 39: also need to see a increase
01:46:41 Speaker 39: in specific housing. We have a
01:46:45 Speaker 39: large number of the population who
01:46:48 Speaker 39: don't thrive in traditional housing and
01:46:50 Speaker 39: require more. supports, and we have
01:46:54 Speaker 39: members of our population who require
01:46:56 Speaker 39: medical level housing. So we need
01:47:02 Speaker 39: an increase in all levels of
01:47:04 Speaker 39: housing in order to meet that
01:47:06 Speaker 39: demand. Okay, thank you. Any other
01:47:11 Speaker 39: questions, Councillor Mackey? Thank you, Deputy
01:47:13 Speaker 39: Warden, and through you to Mr.
01:47:15 Speaker 39: Taylor, Scott. You mentioned in one
01:47:17 Speaker 39: of your slides consultation, and the
01:47:19 Speaker 39: ministry is doing consultation, and the
01:47:24 Speaker 39: government is doing consultation in regards
01:47:31 Speaker 39: to communal wastewater and water systems.
01:47:33 Speaker 39: I'm only familiar in our municipality
01:47:38 Speaker 39: in campgrounds where they have communal
01:47:41 Speaker 39: water and wastewater. So I was
01:47:43 Speaker 39: a little taken back about the
01:47:46 Speaker 39: responsibility lying on the municipality when
01:47:48 Speaker 39: they fail. Is the province looking
01:47:53 Speaker 39: at expanding the use of communal
01:47:57 Speaker 39: wastewater and water systems? And will
01:48:07 Speaker 39: the municipalities have any right to
01:48:11 Speaker 40: refuse or not if we end
01:48:13 Speaker 40: up bearing the responsibility? Thank you.
01:48:16 Speaker 41: Through you, Mr. Deputy Warden. Thanks
01:48:19 Speaker 41: for your question, Councillor Mackey. Our
01:48:20 Speaker 41: understanding from the consultation materials and
01:48:22 Speaker 41: what we've seen through through AMO
01:48:24 Speaker 41: and Western Ontario Warden's is is
01:48:26 Speaker 41: the province is looking for a
01:48:29 Speaker 41: way to be more permissive of
01:48:31 Speaker 41: those communal systems. Certainly, I think
01:48:34 Speaker 41: municipalities are are in a gentle
01:48:36 Speaker 41: way pushing back to say, you
01:48:43 Speaker 41: know, fair enough. We all need
01:48:45 Speaker 41: to do our part in terms
01:48:48 Speaker 41: of increasing housing supply. but that
01:48:49 Speaker 41: risk element is not to be
01:48:51 Speaker 41: underestimated. And so, in the consultation
01:48:53 Speaker 41: materials associated with this legislation, they
01:48:55 Speaker 29: they they've talked about further consultation
01:48:58 Speaker 29: and and they've talked about streamlined
01:49:00 Speaker 29: municipal and provincial approvals. But we
01:49:02 Speaker 29: don't have sort of that criteria
01:49:03 Speaker 29: yet on what that streamlining would
01:49:04 Speaker 29: be. Certainly, from a staff perspective,
01:49:07 Speaker 29: we're happy to take direction from
01:49:10 Speaker 29: council. if there is strong feelings
01:49:13 Speaker 29: on on that responsibility agreement element
01:49:14 Speaker 29: or or how we could frame
01:49:17 Speaker 29: that to the province to have
01:49:20 Speaker 29: a constructive conversation. Thanks, Scott, Councillor
01:49:22 Speaker 29: Dubreuil. Thank you, and through you,
01:49:23 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden to Mister Taylor, and
01:49:25 Speaker 29: in general, I had written down
01:49:27 Speaker 29: the Ontario Western Municipal Conference and
01:49:30 Speaker 29: where we had heard about this
01:49:32 Speaker 29: communal water and wastewater system. I
01:49:36 Speaker 29: attended that workshop, and the concern
01:49:38 Speaker 29: of you know a communal water
01:49:40 Speaker 29: and wastewater system being constructed not
01:49:42 Speaker 29: to municipal standards. It always reminds
01:49:45 Speaker 29: me of the you know this
01:49:48 Speaker 29: is the twenty fifth anniversary year
01:49:50 Speaker 29: of the Walkerton tragedy. We seem
01:49:51 Speaker 29: to be you know loosening the
01:49:55 Speaker 29: regulations we established municipal water systems
01:49:57 Speaker 29: and regulations to prevent. that from
01:49:59 Speaker 29: ever happening again. So I have,
01:50:01 Speaker 29: I I trust that our commenting
01:50:03 Speaker 29: will be to remind the province
01:50:05 Speaker 29: of the importance of a standard
01:50:08 Speaker 29: to be upheld, and the concern
01:50:09 Speaker 29: that if it's not built to
01:50:11 Speaker 29: our standard, then we can't assume
01:50:12 Speaker 29: the risk. Um, that is was
01:50:14 Speaker 29: is more of a comment and
01:50:15 Speaker 29: an expression of, uh. Stressing that
01:50:17 Speaker 29: point, if I may, I have
01:50:20 Speaker 29: one other comment. Throughout this presentation,
01:50:21 Speaker 29: with all due respect to Toronto,
01:50:23 Speaker 29: I probably heard Toronto referenced four
01:50:24 Speaker 29: times or more. If we could
01:50:25 Speaker 29: convey to the province that one
01:50:28 Speaker 29: size does not fit all, and
01:50:29 Speaker 29: when did we lose sight of
01:50:30 Speaker 29: the importance of taking a rural
01:50:32 Speaker 29: lens, our geography. our infrastructure, our
01:50:34 Speaker 29: environment is very different, and painting
01:50:38 Speaker 29: us with the same brush to
01:50:39 Speaker 29: our more urban sister municipalities is
01:50:44 Speaker 29: is a challenge for us. So,
01:50:47 Speaker 41: thank you for the presentation. It
01:50:54 Speaker 41: it was excellent and really did
01:50:55 Speaker 41: open my eyes to everything that
01:50:58 Speaker 41: is being downloaded. on us. Thank
01:51:00 Speaker 41: you. Okay, Councillor. anybody want to
01:51:03 Speaker 41: comment, Councillor Hope? Go ahead. There
01:51:05 Speaker 41: we go. Thank you, Councillor Mask.
01:51:06 Speaker 29: Okay. This question through you, Mr.
01:51:08 Speaker 29: Warden, is to is to Mr.
01:51:10 Speaker 29: Taylor. I know it was concerned
01:51:11 Speaker 29: that unfortunately. Gray County was not
01:51:13 Speaker 29: included in having access to the
01:51:15 Speaker 29: CIP programme. I find that to
01:51:18 Speaker 29: be unfortunate because that is such
01:51:20 Speaker 29: an excellent mechanism for affordable, attainable
01:51:21 Speaker 29: housing. Could you tell us, give
01:51:22 Speaker 29: us, you know, your perspective on
01:51:24 Speaker 29: why Gray was not on that
01:51:26 Speaker 29: list? Thank you. Yeah, through you,
01:51:27 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden. It's a good question,
01:51:29 Speaker 29: Councillor Hope. I'm not entirely sure.
01:51:32 Speaker 29: So years ago, sort of when
01:51:33 Speaker 29: I started my career in planning,
01:51:35 Speaker 29: it was only lower tiers or
01:51:36 Speaker 29: single tiers that could offer community
01:51:42 Speaker 29: improvement plans. And then the province
01:51:44 Speaker 29: has made changes changes to the
01:51:46 Speaker 29: act. I don't know, ten ish
01:51:49 Speaker 29: years ago. Feels like it was
01:51:52 Speaker 29: a blink, but it was probably
01:51:54 Speaker 22: ten years. And and they they
01:51:56 Speaker 22: allowed for prescribed upper tiers to
01:51:58 Speaker 22: offer community improvement plans. And where
01:51:59 Speaker 22: those prescribed upper tiers could offer
01:52:00 Speaker 22: those community improvement plans. It wasn't
01:52:03 Speaker 22: on the same breadth that a
01:52:04 Speaker 22: a lower tier or single tier
01:52:06 Speaker 22: municipality could offer those plans on.
01:52:09 Speaker 22: So housing was one of those
01:52:11 Speaker 22: things that that specifically those upper
01:52:14 Speaker 22: tiers could speak to in that
01:52:16 Speaker 22: regard. And and so you know,
01:52:18 Speaker 22: flash back to two thousand seventeen
01:52:19 Speaker 22: or eighteen. That's why Gray, working
01:52:20 Speaker 22: with our partners in economic development,
01:52:22 Speaker 22: tourism, and culture, came up with
01:52:23 Speaker 22: the the community improvement plan template
01:52:27 Speaker 22: programme, programme whereby it would still
01:52:31 Speaker 22: be a municipal CIP, but the
01:52:33 Speaker 22: county would would help do some
01:52:35 Speaker 42: of the heavy lifting in terms
01:52:36 Speaker 42: of establishing those CIPs and and
01:52:40 Speaker 42: and and and flow some money
01:52:41 Speaker 42: through as well. More recently, through
01:52:43 Speaker 42: some staff reports from from Liz
01:52:44 Speaker 02: Buckton, and she actually had a
01:52:47 Speaker 02: further report drafted just before Bill
01:52:50 Speaker 02: 60 was announced. Again, asking the
01:52:52 Speaker 02: province to to allow upper tiers
01:52:56 Speaker 02: who aren't prescribed to be able
01:52:57 Speaker 02: to offer this. It was one
01:53:00 Speaker 02: of those things that you know,
01:53:01 Speaker 02: as as a county. staff person,
01:53:03 Speaker 02: we kind of scratched our head
01:53:12 Speaker 02: at you know what what harm
01:53:14 Speaker 02: was there to the province if
01:53:16 Speaker 02: the municipalities at an upper tier
01:55:54 Speaker 02: level wanted to flow money into
02:01:07 Speaker 02: certain programmemes. So it seemed like
02:01:08 Speaker 02: kind of one of those low
02:01:09 Speaker 01: hanging fruit ones. So we're super
02:01:14 Speaker 08: thankful that the province is now
02:01:15 Speaker 08: considering this. But I don't have
02:01:18 Speaker 08: a great answer for you as
02:01:21 Speaker 08: to you know why it wasn't
02:01:24 Speaker 08: done earlier in that regard. Follow
02:01:26 Speaker 08: up, please. So is is there
02:01:28 Speaker 08: an opportunity with Roma delegations? Maybe
02:01:33 Speaker 08: aimo to take this further and
02:01:35 Speaker 08: to see about accessing this programme
02:01:40 Speaker 08: through Deputy Warren. Certainly, we're happy
02:01:43 Speaker 08: to take any direction from Council.
02:01:47 Speaker 08: In in the draft legislation right
02:01:48 Speaker 08: now, that is included, and and
02:01:50 Speaker 08: so if if the legislation were
02:01:52 Speaker 08: to pass as per the draft,
02:01:53 Speaker 08: then then there'd sort of be
02:01:57 Speaker 08: no need for further lobbying in
02:01:58 Speaker 08: that regard, if you will. If
02:01:59 Speaker 08: it's something that. council feels strongly
02:02:02 Speaker 08: about, we want to make our
02:02:04 Speaker 08: voices heard with groups like AMO
02:02:06 Speaker 08: or ROMA or Western Ontario Wardens.
02:02:12 Speaker 08: Certainly happy to put that forward.
02:02:14 Speaker 08: You know, Liz is still got
02:02:18 Speaker 08: her draft report, and and we
02:02:20 Speaker 43: were just kind of chewing over:
02:02:26 Speaker 43: do we still bring something forward?
02:02:30 Speaker 43: Do we not? But I think
02:02:33 Speaker 43: from a staff perspective, we're just
02:02:35 Speaker 43: kind of eagerly waiting to see
02:02:38 Speaker 43: what passes here, and and and
02:02:40 Speaker 43: if it does pass as as
02:02:44 Speaker 43: drafted, then there might not be
02:02:45 Speaker 43: the need for any further advocacy
02:02:48 Speaker 43: in that regard. Okay, thank you
02:02:51 Speaker 43: for the question, Councillor McQueen. I'll
02:02:53 Speaker 43: be quick. Just following up with
02:02:57 Speaker 43: Councillor Debrine. Standardizing one road system
02:02:59 Speaker 43: design, and like in the problem
02:03:01 Speaker 43: material, I'm sure Pat would add
02:03:03 Speaker 43: more to that. We have what
02:03:06 Speaker 43: they call weather issues. So a
02:03:08 Speaker 43: road design in North Bay might
02:03:09 Speaker 43: be different than a road that's
02:03:11 Speaker 43: designed in Mississauga. More recently, just
02:03:13 Speaker 43: we had a Grey County Federation
02:03:16 Speaker 43: of Ag meeting last night. The
02:03:18 Speaker 43: concern is is designing roads for
02:03:19 Speaker 43: large agricultural equipment. Now you're not
02:03:24 Speaker 43: going to devise something in Mississauga.
02:03:25 Speaker 43: I didn't say Toronto that you
02:03:27 Speaker 43: would maybe design differently in Grey
02:03:29 Speaker 43: County, Bruce County, or a rural
02:03:31 Speaker 43: part. And I think that's so
02:03:32 Speaker 43: important about the rural ends. I
02:03:34 Speaker 43: think that should be one of
02:03:36 Speaker 43: our comments back. Is that rural
02:03:39 Speaker 43: ends? Yeah, agreed. Any other? Just
02:03:41 Speaker 43: one observation I made was from
02:03:44 Speaker 43: Scott's comments about the limitation in
02:03:46 Speaker 43: the number of pages for an.
02:03:48 Speaker 43: A number of pages for an
02:03:50 Speaker 43: official plan. I believe it was
02:03:53 Speaker 43: Winston Churchill during the war when
02:03:55 Speaker 43: he was prime minister insisted that
02:03:57 Speaker 43: any report that landed on his
02:03:59 Speaker 43: desk was one page. So there
02:04:01 Speaker 43: may be some merit to it.
02:04:02 Speaker 43: Just saying, just saying. Not picking
02:04:04 Speaker 43: on planning, but just saying. Okay,
02:04:06 Speaker 43: I think we're ready for the
02:04:08 Speaker 43: vote. All those in favour? That
02:04:09 Speaker 43: is carried. Thank you very much.
02:04:13 Speaker 43: Thank you to Scott, Sharon, and
02:04:14 Speaker 43: Nile for that. stretchy report, report
02:04:16 Speaker 43: number. You really? Lunch is going
02:04:18 Speaker 43: to be here in half an
02:04:21 Speaker 43: hour. All right, let's recess for
02:04:22 Speaker 43: five minutes. Okay. One minute warning.
02:04:24 Speaker 43: Okay. I think we have quorum
02:04:26 Speaker 43: back. We'll bring. the meeting back
02:04:28 Speaker 43: to order. Council, it has been
02:04:29 Speaker 43: brought to my attention that there
02:04:32 Speaker 43: is some interest in the gallery
02:04:35 Speaker 43: regarding report number seven F or
02:04:38 Speaker 43: item number on the agenda. Would
02:04:41 Speaker 43: council be obliging to move that
02:04:44 Speaker 43: up to do that now prior
02:04:47 Speaker 43: to lunch? Anyone objecting? Seeing no
02:04:49 Speaker 43: objection, we'll proceed with item seven
02:04:50 Speaker 43: F, which is. And here I
02:04:53 Speaker 43: thought you were all being entertained
02:04:55 Speaker 43: with our deliberations prior to prior
02:04:58 Speaker 44: to now. You'll be back next
02:05:00 Speaker 44: week, I'm sure, to see the
02:05:02 Speaker 44: the next meeting. In any case,
02:05:05 Speaker 44: we're going to deal with the
02:05:07 Speaker 44: budget and finance committee minutes dated
02:05:10 Speaker 44: October 29th. Mary Lou is going
02:05:12 Speaker 44: to speak to them, so Mary
02:05:14 Speaker 44: Lou, the floor is yours, and
02:05:16 Speaker 44: welcome. I need a mover and
02:05:17 Speaker 44: seconder. Sorry, Councillor Debrine and Councillor
02:05:19 Speaker 44: Gregg. Councillor Debrine and Councillor Greg,
02:05:22 Speaker 10: thank you. Thank you, Mr. Vice
02:05:24 Speaker 10: Chair. Budget and Finance met on
02:05:25 Speaker 10: October 29th, and the the primary
02:05:29 Speaker 10: focus of the meeting was ten
02:05:30 Speaker 10: year capital forecast. Corporate capital funding
02:05:34 Speaker 10: needs for 2026, as presented, were
02:05:35 Speaker 10: 21 million 117,500, and that's an
02:05:36 Speaker 10: increase. of three million thirty-two thousand
02:05:40 Speaker 10: two hundred dollars, higher than the
02:05:41 Speaker 10: net capital funding that was in
02:05:43 Speaker 10: the 2025 approved forecast. The increase
02:05:44 Speaker 10: to the capital levy in 2026
02:05:46 Speaker 10: is largely driven by it's
02:05:49 Speaker 10: approximately two point nine million dollars,
02:05:50 Speaker 10: with the impacts in transportation services,
02:05:52 Speaker 10: paramedic services, and housing portfolios. The
02:05:54 Speaker 10: increase we talked about was there
02:05:56 Speaker 10: was an increase set aside for
02:05:59 Speaker 10: asset management totaling one. million seven
02:06:03 Speaker 10: hundred forty-eight thousand one hundred dollars,
02:06:05 Speaker 10: one million just shy of one
02:06:10 Speaker 10: point four million is a levy
02:06:11 Speaker 45: increase, and the remainder of three
02:06:17 Speaker 45: hundred forty-eight thousand eight hundred was
02:06:19 Speaker 45: from the OCIF allocation. There's an
02:06:20 Speaker 45: increase of one hundred twenty-nine thousand
02:06:22 Speaker 45: three hundred to the transfer to
02:06:23 Speaker 45: the Affordable Housing Reserve, included as
02:06:26 Speaker 45: presented earlier in the year, one
02:06:27 Speaker 45: million two hundred forty thousand nine
02:06:29 Speaker 46: hundred dollars funded from the levy
02:06:30 Speaker 46: for the Road Exchange Project, and.
02:06:31 Speaker 46: an increase of one hundred and
02:06:33 Speaker 46: forty-six thousand eight hundred dollars to
02:06:35 Speaker 46: fund ventures for paramedic service base
02:06:37 Speaker 46: builds. As part of the presentation,
02:06:39 Speaker 46: each department provided an overview of
02:06:42 Speaker 46: their capital forecasts, with emphasis on
02:06:44 Speaker 46: years one and three, and anything
02:06:45 Speaker 46: that was new or changed was
02:06:47 Speaker 46: identified, and they responded to questions
02:06:50 Speaker 46: from committee. After the presentations, committee
02:06:53 Speaker 46: recommended two adjustments to the twenty
02:06:54 Speaker 46: twenty six budget and twenty twenty
02:06:56 Speaker 47: seven proposed budget that are reflected
02:06:59 Speaker 47: in the minutes from the. meeting.
02:07:00 Speaker 47: As the minutes from this meeting
02:07:02 Speaker 47: have not been approved by council,
02:07:05 Speaker 47: the adjustments have been noted but
02:07:09 Speaker 47: not incorporated in the draft budget
02:07:11 Speaker 08: that will be discussed on December
02:07:13 Speaker 08: fifth and twelfth. And the final
02:07:14 Speaker 08: meeting topic was the review of
02:07:16 Speaker 08: the twenty twenty five capital project
02:07:19 Speaker 08: status update report based on August
02:07:20 Speaker 08: thirty first internally produced financial statements,
02:07:21 Speaker 08: and it was noted that there
02:07:25 Speaker 08: were two hundred and fifty nine
02:07:26 Speaker 08: capital projects. Stats were shared on
02:07:28 Speaker 08: procurement status and project status. The
02:07:31 Speaker 08: status can be. different. If, for
02:07:33 Speaker 08: example, the procurement has been completed,
02:07:35 Speaker 08: such as awarding an ambulance, but
02:07:41 Speaker 08: there are delays in receiving the
02:07:42 Speaker 08: ambulance due to supply chain. And
02:07:43 Speaker 08: happy to take any questions. Thank
02:07:46 Speaker 08: you, Mary Lou. And as you
02:07:47 Speaker 10: indicated, just to be clear, regardless
02:07:49 Speaker 10: of what we do with the
02:07:53 Speaker 10: minutes today, they are recommendations to
02:07:54 Speaker 10: the draft budget. So there is
02:07:56 Speaker 10: an opportunity to change. through the
02:07:57 Speaker 10: budget deliberations, but nonetheless, if there's
02:07:59 Speaker 10: changes to be requested or questions,
02:08:01 Speaker 10: let's have them. Councillor Nielsen, please.
02:08:03 Speaker 10: Just a first question or first
02:08:05 Speaker 10: comment, I guess, because the recommendations
02:08:06 Speaker 10: that are being made here to
02:08:10 Speaker 10: this body came from a smaller
02:08:11 Speaker 10: committee. I would like to move
02:08:12 Speaker 10: that we split the question. Some
02:08:14 Speaker 30: of the questions have specific requests
02:08:17 Speaker 30: that are being removed. Others are
02:08:18 Speaker 30: different directions for future budgets. So
02:08:21 Speaker 30: I'd like to split the question.
02:08:22 Speaker 30: So. we can vote on them
02:08:28 Speaker 30: individually. Okay. You want to move?
02:08:34 Speaker 30: You're moving that we split each
02:08:37 Speaker 30: motion separately and vote on each
02:08:39 Speaker 48: motion separately, or do you wish
02:08:41 Speaker 43: one or two to come out?
02:08:42 Speaker 43: Just for the premise of one
02:08:47 Speaker 43: or two that might be voted
02:08:53 Speaker 43: on separately and amendments that might
02:08:55 Speaker 49: be made, split the question. Have
02:08:58 Speaker 49: the I think there's six different
02:08:59 Speaker 49: recommendations coming out of here. Some
02:09:01 Speaker 50: of them will be pretty quick
02:09:02 Speaker 50: motions. Others might take more conversation.
02:09:04 Speaker 50: Fair enough. Is there a seconder
02:09:06 Speaker 50: for that motion to split the
02:09:09 Speaker 50: question, Councillor Carlton? Thank you. Any
02:09:11 Speaker 50: discussion, Councillor Greg? Is that including
02:09:13 Speaker 50: lost motions because those also show
02:09:16 Speaker 50: in the minutes? I'm going to
02:09:17 Speaker 50: ask the clerk on that one,
02:09:20 Speaker 50: Madam Clerk. And thank you, and
02:09:22 Speaker 50: my apologies to Council and the
02:09:24 Speaker 50: public. We did have a bit
02:09:26 Speaker 50: of a glitch when we. were
02:09:29 Speaker 50: posting our revised agenda. I don't
02:09:33 Speaker 50: know exactly when it happened, but
02:09:34 Speaker 50: some of you may have seen
02:09:36 Speaker 19: those motions that were lost, and
02:09:39 Speaker 19: some of you may have not
02:09:40 Speaker 19: seen them at all. The ones
02:09:41 Speaker 19: that are intended to be considered
02:09:45 Speaker 19: here today and that are on
02:09:50 Speaker 19: the floor do not include those
02:09:52 Speaker 19: lost motions. They're only the ones
02:09:53 Speaker 19: that were voted and supported at
02:09:57 Speaker 19: the committee level, and they should
02:09:59 Speaker 19: be showing correctly on your eSCRIBE
02:10:00 Speaker 51: packages and on your web on
02:10:01 Speaker 51: the website now. So that would.
02:10:03 Speaker 51: entail six, not the ones that
02:10:04 Speaker 51: are lost. Is that okay? Any
02:10:06 Speaker 51: other questions on the amendment to
02:10:08 Speaker 51: split the questions? Not seeing any.
02:10:09 Speaker 51: I'll call the question. All those
02:10:12 Speaker 51: in favour? That just carried. So
02:10:14 Speaker 51: we'll consider the first, which is
02:10:16 Speaker 51: that the reevaluated for opportunities to
02:10:17 Speaker 51: scope reductions, and that information be
02:10:19 Speaker 51: provided on the cost of the
02:10:22 Speaker 51: project. Is the mover and seconder
02:10:24 Speaker 51: for that motion? Sorry, we don't.
02:10:26 Speaker 51: Okay, we just need. to vote
02:10:27 Speaker 51: on. We don't need a mover
02:10:33 Speaker 51: and seconder. Any discussion on that
02:10:35 Speaker 51: particular motion? Not seeing any. I'll
02:10:38 Speaker 51: call the question. All those in
02:10:41 Speaker 39: favour? That is carried. The second
02:10:43 Speaker 39: one is the paramedic services base
02:10:46 Speaker 39: in Aitken be deferred to the
02:10:49 Speaker 39: twenty twenty seven budget. Any discussion?
02:10:51 Speaker 39: Councillor Nielsen. Just a quick comment
02:10:54 Speaker 39: on this one. I do think
02:10:57 Speaker 39: that there's some logic to this
02:11:00 Speaker 39: deferral. We we are adding the
02:11:02 Speaker 39: Dundalk paramedic base that. The Dundalk
02:11:04 Speaker 39: paramedic base—that was a surprise cost.
02:11:08 Speaker 39: I think this is a reasonable
02:11:10 Speaker 39: change in the in the plan
02:11:11 Speaker 39: of the paramedic services. As we're
02:11:17 Speaker 39: trying to, you know, we're making
02:11:19 Speaker 39: the same amount of investment into
02:11:21 Speaker 39: paramedic services, just maybe changing location
02:11:24 Speaker 39: based upon necessity now. So I
02:11:26 Speaker 43: think this is just a very
02:11:28 Speaker 43: logical addition. Okay, thank you for
02:11:31 Speaker 43: that. Any further questions, Council Bordignon?
02:11:34 Speaker 43: Thank you, Deputy Warden. Through you,
02:11:38 Speaker 43: in the same vein, I do
02:11:41 Speaker 43: have a question, though. Does does
02:11:44 Speaker 43: this in the minutes talking about
02:11:46 Speaker 43: feverish? Minutes talking about Faversham, Thornbury,
02:11:48 Speaker 43: and the other bases in Cobble
02:11:50 Speaker 43: Beach. Is does that affect the
02:11:52 Speaker 43: moving the one out or deferral?
02:11:57 Speaker 43: Does that do a domino effect?
02:12:00 Speaker 43: Ready. Are you, Mr. Deputy Warden?
02:12:05 Speaker 43: It. We did look, and I'll
02:12:07 Speaker 43: I'll look to Kevin. We did
02:12:09 Speaker 43: talk about moving that you would
02:12:11 Speaker 43: only have so many bases a
02:12:12 Speaker 43: year. Kevin, maybe you want to
02:12:14 Speaker 43: comment, please. The discussion was is
02:12:14 Speaker 43: that we are building Fever Sham
02:12:15 Speaker 43: and Denoc. It's it's ongoing right
02:12:19 Speaker 43: now, so we do have a
02:12:21 Speaker 43: number of bases in the project
02:12:22 Speaker 52: scope right now. So we did
02:12:23 Speaker 52: talk about you know because of
02:12:26 Speaker 52: that, and probably best, and we
02:12:28 Speaker 52: also have the the deployment review
02:12:29 Speaker 52: happening next year with budget approval
02:12:31 Speaker 52: that those type of recommendations will
02:12:33 Speaker 52: go forward. So the the talk
02:12:35 Speaker 52: was is that eight would be
02:12:37 Speaker 52: deferred until twenty twenty seven, but
02:12:39 Speaker 52: there wasn't really any talk about
02:12:41 Speaker 52: moving anything further out. But again,
02:12:42 Speaker 52: we could look at the comprehensive
02:12:45 Speaker 52: deployment review to help best guide
02:12:47 Speaker 52: us next year. Okay, good. Any
02:12:51 Speaker 52: other questions? Not seeing any. I'll
02:12:55 Speaker 52: call the question. All those in
02:12:57 Speaker 52: favour? Aye is carried. Number three:
02:12:58 Speaker 52: the funding for the experimental acres
02:13:00 Speaker 52: project in the amount of twenty
02:13:01 Speaker 52: eight thousand. Be In the amount
02:13:02 Speaker 52: of twenty-eight thousand, be removed from
02:13:04 Speaker 52: the draft twenty-twenty-six budget discussion. Councillor
02:13:06 Speaker 52: McQueen, like Mr. Ward, and I
02:13:08 Speaker 52: did pull the—I think it was
02:13:10 Speaker 52: six P—that talked about what the
02:13:15 Speaker 52: Ag services in Markdale do, and
02:13:17 Speaker 52: one of those pages, and there,
02:13:20 Speaker 52: everybody looks back to it. It
02:13:23 Speaker 52: did talk about the experimental acres,
02:13:25 Speaker 52: and pardon the pun, but a
02:13:26 Speaker 52: little bit of seed money goes
02:13:28 Speaker 52: a long way to developing ways
02:13:31 Speaker 52: of resilience. We know we're dealing
02:13:32 Speaker 52: with climate change, and a lot
02:13:34 Speaker 52: of those experimental projects are are
02:13:36 Speaker 52: based on small funding that create
02:13:37 Speaker 52: big results. And I'll use an
02:13:39 Speaker 52: example of what twenty twenty five
02:13:41 Speaker 52: years ago, no tilling, how that
02:13:44 Speaker 52: changed a lot of of things
02:13:47 Speaker 52: in our practices. So I would
02:13:49 Speaker 52: say that this should be something
02:13:51 Speaker 52: that should be left in the
02:13:52 Speaker 52: budget. Okay, thank you, Councillor Dubreuil.
02:13:54 Speaker 52: Thank you, and through you, to
02:13:56 Speaker 52: Mary Lou, and to the minutes.
02:13:59 Speaker 52: My understanding was that this is
02:14:00 Speaker 52: a recommendation to remove the item
02:14:02 Speaker 52: from the 2026 budget, but that
02:14:04 Speaker 52: it would still show as having
02:14:07 Speaker 52: been removed, so we don't lose
02:14:10 Speaker 52: sight of it. And it would
02:14:12 Speaker 52: then be up to the committee,
02:14:14 Speaker 52: the whole, and council to determine
02:14:17 Speaker 52: what goes in, what stays out,
02:14:20 Speaker 52: on our December 5th and 12th
02:14:24 Speaker 52: deliberations. If you could confirm that.
02:14:26 Speaker 52: right now it's just going to
02:14:30 Speaker 52: kind of sit in in limbo
02:14:32 Speaker 52: for us to determine. And through
02:14:35 Speaker 52: you, Mr. Deputy Warden, because of
02:14:37 Speaker 52: the timelines that this meeting was
02:14:38 Speaker 52: October twenty ninth, the minutes come
02:14:40 Speaker 52: here today, and they will not
02:14:42 Speaker 52: be passed by County Council until
02:14:44 Speaker 52: November twenty seventh. But there was
02:14:46 Speaker 52: the decision made that because Council
02:14:47 Speaker 52: hasn't approved the minutes. Everything that
02:14:49 Speaker 52: an adjustment was requested has remained
02:14:50 Speaker 52: in the budget because we didn't
02:14:55 Speaker 52: have council's approval in order to
02:14:57 Speaker 52: make those adjustments. So when you
02:15:00 Speaker 52: see the package comes out for
02:15:03 Speaker 52: December fifth and twelfth, it will
02:15:04 Speaker 52: contain the eight and base still
02:15:06 Speaker 52: for twenty six, and it will
02:15:07 Speaker 52: contain mental acres for twenty eight
02:15:10 Speaker 52: thousand. Okay. Thank you. Any further
02:15:13 Speaker 52: discussion, Councillor Greg? Thank you, and
02:15:16 Speaker 52: I do have some comments, and
02:15:18 Speaker 52: I'm awarded five minutes to make
02:15:20 Speaker 52: them under the procedural bylaws. So
02:15:22 Speaker 52: let me know if I get
02:15:23 Speaker 52: the five minutes, but I think
02:15:25 Speaker 52: I'll just be under that. This
02:15:28 Speaker 52: was my motion, so I'm glad
02:15:29 Speaker 52: to speak to it, and I'm
02:15:31 Speaker 52: just going to go back to
02:15:32 Speaker 52: an email I received on September
02:15:35 Speaker 52: 22, 2023. As a retired farmer
02:15:37 Speaker 52: now living in Georgian Bluffs, I
02:15:39 Speaker 52: was a charter member of Burlington's
02:15:40 Speaker 52: Sustainable Development Committee and a member
02:15:42 Speaker 52: of. conservation, the Halton Board of
02:15:43 Speaker 52: Directors. I was named Halton Region
02:15:45 Speaker 52: Conservationist of the Year in 1886,
02:15:47 Speaker 52: so I am not anti anti
02:15:50 Speaker 52: green. Goes on through a plethora
02:15:51 Speaker 52: of different initiatives that this individual
02:15:54 Speaker 52: has invested in their own property,
02:15:55 Speaker 52: and it concludes: fiscal sustainability is
02:15:58 Speaker 52: a stranger to our governments. And
02:16:01 Speaker 52: I read that because of all
02:16:05 Speaker 52: the emails which we've received from
02:16:09 Speaker 52: the local climate action teams, and
02:16:11 Speaker 52: I'm thankful for all the work
02:16:12 Speaker 52: that they do, but. it's very
02:16:14 Speaker 52: easy to send emails to counsel.
02:16:17 Speaker 52: In fact, I was surprised how
02:16:19 Speaker 52: quickly that the emails started coming
02:16:22 Speaker 52: in after the budget meeting. It's
02:16:23 Speaker 52: it was somewhat unusual. One of
02:16:25 Speaker 52: the premises of the farm rate
02:16:27 Speaker 52: tax ratio being a quarter point
02:16:29 Speaker 52: is because it uses no services
02:16:31 Speaker 52: effectively. So now it's starting to.
02:16:33 Speaker 52: How about we look at increasing
02:16:34 Speaker 52: that tax ratio from a quarter
02:16:35 Speaker 52: point back up to. thirty points
02:16:38 Speaker 52: or forty points, and see what
02:16:40 Speaker 52: that does for the tax base
02:16:41 Speaker 52: across the county. Because it sounds
02:16:44 Speaker 52: like it is starting to use
02:16:46 Speaker 52: services, it's starting to use bigger
02:16:47 Speaker 52: road construction, it's starting to use
02:16:49 Speaker 52: sustainable practices, seed funding. There's a
02:16:51 Speaker 52: company out there called Bear, and
02:16:52 Speaker 52: one of the companies they own
02:16:54 Speaker 52: is Decal. It's in their best
02:16:57 Speaker 52: interest, no different than it's in
02:17:01 Speaker 52: the best interest of every company
02:17:04 Speaker 52: that I deal with in my
02:17:05 Speaker 52: own business, where carbon footprint is
02:17:07 Speaker 52: actually. stamped on some of the
02:17:09 Speaker 52: product. You can see what the
02:17:11 Speaker 52: impact is of the manufacturing in
02:17:14 Speaker 22: it. It's in Bayer's best interest
02:17:17 Speaker 22: to their shareholders to invest in
02:17:19 Speaker 22: research and development, which is why
02:17:22 Speaker 22: in DCOB they invest millions of
02:17:25 Speaker 22: dollars in seed resiliency and and
02:17:29 Speaker 22: being able to adapt seeds to
02:17:32 Speaker 22: various climatic changes. This is a
02:17:34 Speaker 22: further step. My motion here it
02:17:37 Speaker 22: doesn't eliminate one job. It impacts
02:17:38 Speaker 22: six people, or six initiatives across
02:17:40 Speaker 22: the county in the year 2025.
02:17:43 Speaker 22: In terms of corresponding with different
02:17:47 Speaker 22: people, I have someone who's very
02:17:49 Speaker 22: talkative at the Katy Livestock Market,
02:17:51 Speaker 22: and in Gray County, you can't
02:17:53 Speaker 22: get much more involved with the,
02:17:54 Speaker 22: the farming agricultural community than Katy.
02:17:56 Speaker 22: And I asked how many people
02:17:57 Speaker 22: brought up the topic of experimental
02:17:58 Speaker 22: acres in the last two weeks
02:18:00 Speaker 22: at the Katy Market, and the
02:18:01 Speaker 22: answer was zero. So we have
02:18:03 Speaker 22: next door to us a county
02:18:04 Speaker 22: that's looking at four percent tax
02:18:05 Speaker 22: increase, and they're looking to get
02:18:07 Speaker 22: down to three and a half
02:18:09 Speaker 22: percent at Simcoe. We are at
02:18:10 Speaker 22: about six point nine percent. We
02:18:11 Speaker 22: had projected last year for two
02:18:14 Speaker 22: thousand twenty-six four point nine seven
02:18:15 Speaker 22: percent. We're forecasting one point six
02:18:17 Speaker 22: million dollars of growth, and we're
02:18:18 Speaker 22: at six point eight seven percent
02:18:20 Speaker 22: coming out of that meeting. So
02:18:22 Speaker 22: if you vote against. this, I
02:18:23 Speaker 22: do challenge my colleagues. Please stand
02:18:25 Speaker 22: up after. Inform me of where
02:18:26 Speaker 22: you would like me to look
02:18:28 Speaker 22: on November 26 for further cuts,
02:18:33 Speaker 22: because that tax increase is not
02:18:36 Speaker 22: sustainable, and on the shoulders of
02:18:38 Speaker 22: record growth that we've had as
02:18:40 Speaker 22: a county over the years. So,
02:18:42 Speaker 22: we're on a trajectory that we
02:18:44 Speaker 22: have to change. So, please inform
02:18:46 Speaker 22: me where I can further look
02:18:49 Speaker 22: for savings, because in the minutes
02:18:51 Speaker 22: it does state every cut motion
02:18:53 Speaker 22: was Councillor Greg. That's on the
02:18:54 Speaker 22: record there. So, just please inform
02:18:56 Speaker 22: me. further, and we'll look to
02:18:59 Speaker 22: get that money down. But just
02:19:01 Speaker 22: to correct a little bit, the
02:19:03 Speaker 22: correspondence I received, it indicated that
02:19:06 Speaker 22: I was informed about Bill Gates's
02:19:07 Speaker 22: dialogueue. It had nothing to do
02:19:09 Speaker 22: with it. If you watch the
02:19:11 Speaker 22: minutes or watch the video, my
02:19:15 Speaker 22: motion on this came before any
02:19:18 Speaker 22: conversation about Bill Gates, and I
02:19:19 Speaker 53: have never read his correspondence. and
02:19:21 Speaker 22: frankly, don't plan on doing so.
02:19:23 Speaker 22: This is about what's best for
02:19:24 Speaker 22: the county right now in the
02:19:25 Speaker 22: tough budget year. I get it;
02:19:27 Speaker 22: it's a it's a great project,
02:19:28 Speaker 22: but it's one of many great
02:19:29 Speaker 22: projects that comes before the county.
02:19:31 Speaker 22: We had a great project a
02:19:33 Speaker 22: year ago from a lady at
02:19:35 Speaker 22: the southeast southwest corner, and she
02:19:37 Speaker 22: had a youth centre that she
02:19:39 Speaker 22: approached the county about funding, and
02:19:41 Speaker 22: they they got funding from the
02:19:42 Speaker 22: province, which was wonderful, but we
02:19:44 Speaker 22: as a council didn't fund that
02:19:48 Speaker 22: initiative, and. we as a council
02:19:54 Speaker 22: are looking at a tough budget
02:19:57 Speaker 22: year, and that's why we should
02:20:02 Speaker 22: not be funding this initiative this
02:20:03 Speaker 54: year. Thanks. Thanks, sir. Any other,
02:20:05 Speaker 54: Councillor McQueen? Well, I must rebuttle,
02:20:07 Speaker 54: but start with this programme is
02:20:09 Speaker 54: ran through the Grey Ag Services,
02:20:11 Speaker 54: which basically runs on a sheet.
02:20:15 Speaker 54: We all know, and they do
02:20:17 Speaker 54: great jobs, great work. There's 156
02:20:20 Speaker 54: meetings, 30 different groups that go
02:20:21 Speaker 54: through that Grey Ag Services. Gray
02:20:22 Speaker 54: Ag Services office that use those
02:20:24 Speaker 54: facilities, and you talk about not
02:20:28 Speaker 54: knowing anything about it. The Gray
02:20:30 Speaker 54: Ag Services also has looked after
02:20:31 Speaker 54: Gray the Farmers Week in January,
02:20:32 Speaker 54: which they have this year six
02:20:34 Speaker 54: different sorry six different units or
02:20:35 Speaker 54: different days on different things
02:20:38 Speaker 54: around agriculture. I'm pretty sure they're
02:20:40 Speaker 54: going to be talking about this
02:20:41 Speaker 54: experimental acres at that at that
02:20:42 Speaker 54: event. I will say that again
02:20:43 Speaker 54: for the for the discussion we're
02:20:47 Speaker 54: having here today on twenty eight
02:20:49 Speaker 54: thousand dollars of the of the
02:20:51 Speaker 54: millions of dollars budget that we're
02:20:53 Speaker 54: going to be looking at. You
02:20:54 Speaker 54: know where I see a place
02:20:55 Speaker 54: to cut is this download upload.
02:20:59 Speaker 54: That's where your big money is
02:21:01 Speaker 54: going to be affecting this budget,
02:21:03 Speaker 54: but we're not going to go
02:21:06 Speaker 54: there right now. I want to
02:21:09 Speaker 54: give you a small little example
02:21:10 Speaker 54: of something that I saw witnessing
02:21:12 Speaker 54: myself back in the early two
02:21:13 Speaker 54: thousands, where we had a lot
02:21:15 Speaker 54: of hot summers, and I had
02:21:18 Speaker 54: two properties, my own farm and
02:21:21 Speaker 54: my neighbour's. farm, and my farm
02:21:24 Speaker 54: had 80 acres of no fence
02:21:26 Speaker 54: rows, and the neighbouring farm was
02:21:28 Speaker 02: still the 10 acres. It was
02:21:31 Speaker 02: a hot summer. There was no
02:21:36 Speaker 02: second cut on my 80 acres,
02:21:37 Speaker 02: but there was second cut in
02:21:41 Speaker 55: those 10 acre fields. So this
02:21:48 Speaker 55: year in the stewardship agreements, we
02:21:49 Speaker 55: incentivized money for people, farmers, to
02:21:56 Speaker 56: plant trees back and create those
02:22:02 Speaker 56: fence rows, fence rows, or creating
02:22:06 Speaker 56: winds or barriers for the hot
02:22:13 Speaker 56: winds that dry out your land.
02:22:19 Speaker 56: so there's little wee things,
02:22:25 Speaker 56: and I go back to this
02:22:29 Speaker 56: experimental acres that the little things
02:22:34 Speaker 56: that can come out of here,
02:22:41 Speaker 56: successfully or not, are small things
02:22:48 Speaker 56: that can, if they're successful, they
02:22:52 Speaker 56: can be communicated onto the farmers
02:22:55 Speaker 56: of Gray County and throughout. But
02:22:59 Speaker 56: if you don't know, if you
02:23:07 Speaker 56: don't try, so maybe there's opportunities
02:23:08 Speaker 57: for other sources of funding. But
02:23:11 Speaker 57: I think it's been quite successful.
02:23:17 Speaker 56: We had at that stewardship Gray
02:23:23 Speaker 56: Bruce meeting I had a few
02:23:29 Speaker 56: weeks. back, representatives from Great Egg
02:23:31 Speaker 56: Services talked about this experimental lakers,
02:23:35 Speaker 56: and I would say maybe maybe
02:23:37 Speaker 56: they need to come to this
02:23:42 Speaker 56: body and talk a little bit
02:23:43 Speaker 56: more in depth of what they're
02:23:46 Speaker 56: doing to give a little bit
02:23:47 Speaker 56: of more insight of what they're
02:23:52 Speaker 56: doing, and and I'm sure Lori
02:23:53 Speaker 56: would be quite happy to come
02:23:54 Speaker 56: here. But going back to the
02:23:59 Speaker 56: egg services, this is run under
02:24:00 Speaker 56: them, and they do an amazing
02:24:02 Speaker 56: job on the shoestring budget that
02:24:03 Speaker 56: they have, and they they just
02:24:05 Speaker 56: can't figure. out for a little
02:24:10 Speaker 56: bit of money how far this
02:24:12 Speaker 56: could go. So I'll leave it
02:24:17 Speaker 56: at that. Thank you. Any other
02:24:21 Speaker 56: any other questions? Discussion? Not, Councillor
02:24:24 Speaker 58: Pringle. Yeah, thanks, sir. Everyone. Yeah,
02:24:29 Speaker 56: I'm. We support behind Councillor beside
02:24:33 Speaker 56: me here. Also on that too.
02:24:36 Speaker 56: The the Grey Agri Services does
02:24:41 Speaker 56: such an amazing job with the
02:24:47 Speaker 56: little bit of funding that. they
02:24:50 Speaker 56: get and working within the county,
02:24:52 Speaker 56: I would like to see it
02:24:55 Speaker 56: maybe to be tweaked on how
02:24:58 Speaker 56: you get the grant money and
02:25:00 Speaker 56: how that's all all done down
02:25:04 Speaker 56: the road. But I don't want
02:25:06 Speaker 56: to see the opportunity for it
02:25:08 Speaker 56: to disappear right off the right
02:25:12 Speaker 56: off the budget. I think there
02:25:16 Speaker 56: is value there and maybe needs
02:25:19 Speaker 56: to be tweaked on who we
02:25:20 Speaker 56: who we allow to do what
02:25:21 Speaker 56: things. So as far as the
02:25:24 Speaker 56: environmental or experimental goes. I did
02:25:29 Speaker 56: go through the list of what
02:25:35 Speaker 56: was done, and there's a few
02:25:37 Speaker 56: things I picked out there that
02:25:38 Speaker 56: maybe didn't really qualify, in my
02:25:40 Speaker 56: mind, as to being something that
02:25:44 Speaker 56: is you know actually needed as
02:25:47 Speaker 56: to being an experimental project. But
02:25:50 Speaker 56: I don't want to see it
02:25:53 Speaker 56: disappear. I think there's going to
02:25:55 Speaker 56: be some. There's valid information comes
02:25:58 Speaker 56: from that on small properties, whether
02:26:02 Speaker 56: it be five acres, two acres,
02:26:04 Speaker 56: one acre, to make a decision
02:26:10 Speaker 56: on all. On possible benefits down
02:26:16 Speaker 56: the road, and it's part of
02:26:17 Speaker 56: it. It's part of agriculture. It's
02:26:19 Speaker 56: all part of it. We expand
02:26:23 Speaker 56: and change all the time. So,
02:26:26 Speaker 56: I'm also in support of not
02:26:29 Speaker 56: removing it from the budget. Yep.
02:26:33 Speaker 56: Okay. Thank you. Any other discussion
02:26:35 Speaker 56: or questions? Not seeing any. I'll
02:26:39 Speaker 09: call the question. Councillor Eccles, are
02:26:41 Speaker 09: you voting, or are you asking
02:26:44 Speaker 09: for a question? Go ahead. It's
02:26:46 Speaker 09: not about as much of a
02:26:49 Speaker 09: question as it would be a
02:26:51 Speaker 09: statement. It's not about experimental acres
02:26:54 Speaker 09: and gray agri services. We support
02:26:55 Speaker 09: a we support the gray agri
02:26:59 Speaker 09: services with housing, office space, quite
02:27:02 Speaker 09: a bit in that. I questioned.
02:27:05 Speaker 09: strategically, how far do we go
02:27:08 Speaker 09: into these programmemes? If we're into
02:27:12 Speaker 09: supporting this programme and distributing property
02:27:17 Speaker 09: taxpayers' money, where's the next? Or
02:27:19 Speaker 09: what's the precedent that it's set,
02:27:23 Speaker 09: strategically? is it Viking surveys, an
02:27:24 Speaker 09: industry? Is it cranberry ciderry? Where
02:27:25 Speaker 09: in it is this part of
02:27:29 Speaker 09: what Gray County should be going?
02:27:31 Speaker 09: How far outside of what we're
02:27:33 Speaker 09: here to do is this got?
02:27:35 Speaker 09: Is this God? We've expanded tremendously.
02:27:38 Speaker 09: I was a farmer, and we
02:27:41 Speaker 09: did, you know, I had test
02:27:45 Speaker 09: plots of corn, alfalfa, a lot
02:27:48 Speaker 09: of that. But being an independent
02:27:53 Speaker 09: businessman, how much is dependent? on
02:27:54 Speaker 09: this, and I don't think that
02:28:00 Speaker 09: getting at what we're wanting to
02:28:05 Speaker 09: do—that this is the right way
02:28:07 Speaker 09: to do it. That's why you
02:28:10 Speaker 09: know, second of the motion to
02:28:11 Speaker 09: put it on the floor. We've
02:28:13 Speaker 09: heard a lot of debate about
02:28:16 Speaker 09: Bill Gates, very visionary, in a
02:28:19 Speaker 09: couple of those letters that have
02:28:21 Speaker 09: came to us over the last
02:28:24 Speaker 09: few days, last two weeks. Then
02:28:26 Speaker 09: again, there was another. There's a
02:28:28 Speaker 09: couple of other ones that said
02:28:30 Speaker 09: he doesn't even live here, so
02:28:33 Speaker 09: we shouldn't even listen to him.
02:28:36 Speaker 09: So I'm slightly confused about what
02:28:40 Speaker 09: to believe, and what even is
02:28:43 Speaker 09: in that op-ed that Bill Gates
02:28:46 Speaker 09: gave. But in my mind, it's
02:28:48 Speaker 59: more of where we have as
02:28:50 Speaker 59: a county, and my. friend across
02:28:51 Speaker 59: the row said about
02:28:54 Speaker 59: uploading and downloading, and how much
02:28:56 Speaker 59: of this is that download? Is
02:29:00 Speaker 59: it in our interests and our
02:29:03 Speaker 59: use of taxpayers' dollars, property taxpayers'
02:29:07 Speaker 59: dollars, to get the best out
02:29:11 Speaker 59: of this for us to be
02:29:14 Speaker 59: doing it? I was thinking last
02:29:19 Speaker 59: night, what's the next thing? Canada
02:29:21 Speaker 59: hasn't won a World Series in
02:29:25 Speaker 59: thirty-some odd years. Should we put
02:29:27 Speaker 59: putting Grey County taxpayers' money into
02:29:31 Speaker 59: winning a World Series for us?
02:29:33 Speaker 59: It's kind of a bad example.
02:29:36 Speaker 59: But the thought is, it's over
02:29:38 Speaker 59: where we should be. I think
02:29:42 Speaker 59: we've got to get back to
02:29:44 Speaker 59: doing what we do right and
02:29:47 Speaker 59: do good. and do well. And
02:29:51 Speaker 59: then we can make an impact
02:29:53 Speaker 59: on climate change. And I'm a
02:29:55 Speaker 60: great supporter of that, because I
02:29:56 Speaker 60: think I'm the only person here
02:29:58 Speaker 60: who drove an EV here today.
02:30:01 Speaker 60: I'm committed to climate change. But
02:30:02 Speaker 60: I'm committed to Gray County doing
02:30:07 Speaker 60: what Gray County should be. doing,
02:30:11 Speaker 60: not just what we're mandated, but
02:30:14 Speaker 60: what we should be doing. And
02:30:17 Speaker 60: this, in my mind, is probably
02:30:20 Speaker 60: something that yes, could be left
02:30:23 Speaker 60: to Gray AgriServices to deliver. But
02:30:25 Speaker 60: is it Gray County' responsibility to
02:30:28 Speaker 60: be funding it? And I think
02:30:30 Speaker 60: we've stepped way out of our
02:30:34 Speaker 60: bounds on that. Is that? five?
02:30:36 Speaker 60: Thank you. Thank you, sir. Any
02:30:38 Speaker 60: further comments, Councillor Debrine, and then
02:30:41 Speaker 60: Councillor Body. Thank you, and through
02:30:43 Speaker 60: you, while I, I absolutely agree
02:30:45 Speaker 60: that we need to look at
02:30:47 Speaker 60: every opportunity to reduce our budget
02:30:50 Speaker 60: and to look for ways what's
02:30:52 Speaker 60: necessary and what's not necessary. But
02:30:54 Speaker 60: I'm, I'm reminded that agriculture is
02:30:56 Speaker 60: one of our primary employers. and
02:31:03 Speaker 60: contributors to the GDP, and that
02:31:04 Speaker 60: Gray County, I hear this at
02:31:05 Speaker 60: AMO all the time, is a
02:31:06 Speaker 02: model to be followed, and people
02:31:10 Speaker 02: look to our agricultural community and
02:31:11 Speaker 02: the advancements that they are making
02:31:13 Speaker 02: by doing these small things. Small
02:31:15 Speaker 02: actions can can create tremendous results,
02:31:18 Speaker 02: and so while I'm I'm supporting
02:31:21 Speaker 02: I'm supportive of looking at all
02:31:24 Speaker 02: opportunities to reduce our budget. I
02:31:27 Speaker 02: am supportive of having it as
02:31:29 Speaker 02: a line as long as we
02:31:31 Speaker 02: don't lose sight of it. To
02:31:34 Speaker 02: Councillor Pringle's comment is, maybe we
02:31:35 Speaker 02: needs to be tweaked. Maybe we
02:31:38 Speaker 02: need to scale it back a
02:31:43 Speaker 02: bit. Maybe there's a different vetting
02:31:45 Speaker 02: opportunity, but that comes from staff
02:31:46 Speaker 02: advising us on the benefits, pros,
02:31:48 Speaker 02: the cons, and. so I'm I'm
02:31:49 Speaker 02: looking forward to our deliberations on
02:31:53 Speaker 02: the budget, and I I support
02:31:54 Speaker 02: the budget and finance committee's approach
02:31:58 Speaker 02: and their work in providing us
02:32:00 Speaker 02: suggestions and recommendations. But at the
02:32:02 Speaker 02: the bottom line is is is
02:32:03 Speaker 02: what is good, and what do
02:32:05 Speaker 02: we need? What do we need
02:32:06 Speaker 02: to do now? What do we
02:32:07 Speaker 02: need to do? in the future?
02:32:09 Speaker 02: I'm, I'm on the fence about
02:32:12 Speaker 02: the experimental acres or to the
02:32:15 Speaker 02: level in which we contribute it,
02:32:17 Speaker 02: contribute to it. But I don't
02:32:18 Speaker 02: want to lose sight of it
02:32:19 Speaker 02: because I think it's done some
02:32:22 Speaker 02: remarkable work and some great initiatives
02:32:25 Speaker 02: have come out of that that
02:32:26 Speaker 02: other agricultural farms can then model.
02:32:29 Speaker 02: Thank you, Councillor Body. Thank you.
02:32:32 Speaker 02: Warden. I wonder if somebody can
02:32:34 Speaker 02: answer this question. The opposition to
02:32:36 Speaker 02: this seems to be all around
02:32:39 Speaker 02: climate change, but as I'm looking
02:32:40 Speaker 02: at the gray agricultural services, specifically
02:32:42 Speaker 02: 2025 experimental acres projects, I'm not
02:32:44 Speaker 02: seeing the climate change factor in
02:32:46 Speaker 02: there. Remedial mulch for fruit trees,
02:32:50 Speaker 02: forage trials for strip grazing, pasturized
02:32:52 Speaker 02: poultry for soil fertility, overseeding turanet.
02:32:55 Speaker 02: Overseeding turan to extend fall grazing,
02:33:02 Speaker 02: late summer seeding of hay, creation
02:33:07 Speaker 02: of apple guilds. Good projects. I
02:33:08 Speaker 61: get from Councillor McQueen that these
02:33:11 Speaker 61: are agricultural. I'm I'm missing the
02:33:15 Speaker 61: connection with climate change on those.
02:33:17 Speaker 61: That's that's. I don't understand how
02:33:21 Speaker 61: they tie in. To the climate
02:33:24 Speaker 62: change discussion, it it seems like
02:33:28 Speaker 62: we're talking about two different things
02:33:30 Speaker 62: altogether. Thanks, Mary Lou. Do you
02:33:34 Speaker 62: have a response to that, or
02:33:36 Speaker 08: is Randy will have a go
02:33:39 Speaker 08: at it? Randy, please. Thank you
02:33:42 Speaker 08: for that. And and if I
02:33:42 Speaker 08: might turn to Nile or Linda
02:33:44 Speaker 08: to to help with this as
02:33:51 Speaker 08: well, I think in terms of
02:33:56 Speaker 08: the projects that we've we've we've
02:33:59 Speaker 08: seen in terms of some of
02:34:00 Speaker 08: that seed funding being provided to
02:34:02 Speaker 08: to various projects, it's. it's around
02:34:03 Speaker 08: the whole opportunities to adapt to
02:34:05 Speaker 08: some of our our weather our
02:34:09 Speaker 08: changing climate and and opportunities to
02:34:11 Speaker 08: look for how how we might
02:34:12 Speaker 08: be able to use technologies or
02:34:17 Speaker 08: use different different approaches to be
02:34:20 Speaker 08: able to adapt. So it's it's
02:34:23 Speaker 10: it's may and some of that
02:34:23 Speaker 10: may be also to in terms
02:34:26 Speaker 10: of just further sustainable farming practices
02:34:28 Speaker 10: and experiment. Farming practices and experimenting
02:34:30 Speaker 10: with some of those those pieces.
02:34:35 Speaker 10: So, so I'd say it's it's
02:34:37 Speaker 10: definitely in line with what the
02:34:40 Speaker 10: overall kind of climate change umbrella.
02:34:44 Speaker 10: When you look at it from
02:34:45 Speaker 10: both a mitigation and an adaptation
02:34:48 Speaker 10: perspective, the the projects are are
02:34:50 Speaker 10: definitely in alignment with some of
02:34:51 Speaker 10: the actions that are identified in
02:34:52 Speaker 10: going green and gray with respect
02:34:54 Speaker 10: with respect to the agricultural aspects.
02:34:57 Speaker 10: And I guess if I might,
02:34:59 Speaker 10: if you. indulge the chair for
02:35:01 Speaker 10: a minute, I might tell you
02:35:04 Speaker 10: a little story. Some of you,
02:35:07 Speaker 10: some of you, might have heard
02:35:09 Speaker 10: me say this before, but Gray
02:35:11 Speaker 10: County and Bruce, to an extent
02:35:13 Speaker 10: as well, still maintains a lot
02:35:15 Speaker 10: of the legacy infrastructure on our
02:35:18 Speaker 10: farms. We still have basically 100-acre
02:35:19 Speaker 10: lots. They're split up into 10,
02:35:21 Speaker 10: 25, 30-acre pieces. But it's all
02:35:23 Speaker 10: essentially there. It's been there for
02:35:25 Speaker 10: a lot of years. People are
02:35:27 Speaker 10: moving into our area and buying
02:35:28 Speaker 10: up hundred acre parcels that have
02:35:30 Speaker 10: no background in agriculture. Essentially, they
02:35:32 Speaker 10: don't know what they don't know.
02:35:35 Speaker 10: There are some of us, myself
02:35:37 Speaker 10: included, Councillor Eccles, McQueen. There may
02:35:38 Speaker 10: be others that have farmed all
02:35:39 Speaker 10: our lives. We'd never consider doing
02:35:41 Speaker 10: any of the things that have
02:35:41 Speaker 10: been in experimental acres because, just,
02:35:43 Speaker 10: I just wouldn't because I probably
02:35:46 Speaker 10: don't know. if it would work,
02:35:48 Speaker 10: and I just wouldn't. It's not
02:35:52 Speaker 10: what I do. But there are
02:36:00 Speaker 63: people that are willing to go
02:36:04 Speaker 63: out on a limb and try
02:36:05 Speaker 63: stuff because they don't know what
02:36:16 Speaker 63: they don't know. And if some
02:36:21 Speaker 63: of that experimental stuff works, then
02:36:23 Speaker 25: maybe the rest of us take
02:36:30 Speaker 49: a second look at it and
02:36:32 Speaker 49: say, well, maybe that would work
02:36:36 Speaker 49: on my farm. So it's it's
02:36:38 Speaker 64: not so much about going green,
02:36:42 Speaker 64: although there's an element of that
02:36:43 Speaker 64: in it. It's about what's what
02:36:46 Speaker 64: will help sustain agriculture in Gray
02:36:49 Speaker 10: County, specifically, if not the rest
02:36:52 Speaker 10: of the province? So, just a
02:36:53 Speaker 10: little bit of a, I don't
02:36:54 Speaker 10: know if that's a story or
02:36:56 Speaker 10: not, but anyway, I'll, I'll stop
02:36:58 Speaker 10: there. Anybody else have any other
02:36:59 Speaker 10: thoughts? If not, I'll call the
02:37:01 Speaker 10: vote. An affirmative vote would retain
02:37:03 Speaker 10: it out of the budget. A
02:37:04 Speaker 10: no vote would put it back
02:37:06 Speaker 10: into the draft budget. Okay. All
02:37:08 Speaker 10: the all those in favour, remove
02:37:11 Speaker 10: it. Go ahead. What's your point
02:37:12 Speaker 10: of order? Just if you could
02:37:15 Speaker 10: please explain that further, because the
02:37:17 Speaker 10: motion is an approval of the
02:37:18 Speaker 10: committee minute, the minute recommendation. So
02:37:20 Speaker 10: a yay should be approving the
02:37:23 Speaker 10: minutes forthcoming from committee. Correct. Sorry,
02:37:25 Speaker 10: maybe I stated it reverse. I
02:37:28 Speaker 10: apologize. So, an affirmative vote would
02:37:30 Speaker 10: sustain the recommendation from the committee,
02:37:31 Speaker 10: and no vote would overturn that
02:37:33 Speaker 10: recommendation. Okay, we all understand that.
02:37:34 Speaker 10: Now that the chair's got it
02:37:36 Speaker 10: through his thick skull, I'll call
02:37:37 Speaker 10: the vote. All those in favour?
02:37:39 Speaker 10: Those opposed? That motion fails. Okay.
02:37:41 Speaker 10: Now, thank you, Mary Lou. Now
02:37:43 Speaker 10: on to number four: the staff
02:37:46 Speaker 10: repair report on the implications of
02:37:47 Speaker 10: removing the Go and Green and
02:37:48 Speaker 10: Gray initiative for the consideration of
02:37:51 Speaker 10: the 2027 budget. Councillor Nielsen. Thank
02:37:53 Speaker 10: you very much, Stephanie Warren. I
02:37:56 Speaker 10: do want to move an amendment
02:37:57 Speaker 10: to this one. I understand the
02:37:59 Speaker 10: the premise of trying to get
02:38:01 Speaker 10: my red light, Tom. I understand
02:38:07 Speaker 10: the premise of trying to get
02:38:09 Speaker 10: more information. from staff, and I
02:38:11 Speaker 10: think the way we word
02:38:14 Speaker 65: direction to staff and the way
02:38:16 Speaker 65: we word the motion influences the
02:38:18 Speaker 65: data that we receive back from
02:38:19 Speaker 65: staff. And so, in this situation,
02:38:20 Speaker 65: I think the motion's words wouldn't
02:38:25 Speaker 65: actually get the right data back
02:38:27 Speaker 65: to this body to make an
02:38:30 Speaker 65: informed decision. You are preempting the
02:38:33 Speaker 65: decision, and you are giving direction
02:38:35 Speaker 65: to staff to bring a specific.
02:38:37 Speaker 65: set of data, so I'd like
02:38:39 Speaker 65: to make an amendment to the
02:38:41 Speaker 65: motion to remove the words implications
02:38:44 Speaker 65: of removing the Going Green and
02:38:47 Speaker 65: Gray initiative for the consideration of
02:38:48 Speaker 65: the budget, and insert, bring back
02:38:52 Speaker 65: a report on an updated review
02:38:54 Speaker 65: of the targets established in Going
02:38:57 Speaker 65: Green and Gray for the presented
02:38:59 Speaker 65: to be presented prior to the
02:39:01 Speaker 65: budget, and the difference here is
02:39:04 Speaker 65: what we need to do is
02:39:06 Speaker 65: have an actual discussion on the.
02:39:08 Speaker 65: merits, the successes, the challenges of
02:39:11 Speaker 65: going green and gray. Where do
02:39:15 Speaker 65: we need to pivot and put
02:39:17 Speaker 65: energy into? Where do we need
02:39:20 Speaker 65: to put it? Pivot and maybe
02:39:22 Speaker 65: invest more funds into it, rather
02:39:25 Speaker 65: than asking staff for the report
02:39:27 Speaker 65: that says we're pulling out regardless
02:39:28 Speaker 65: of what the data says. And
02:39:30 Speaker 65: there is a difference in terms
02:39:31 Speaker 65: of what that report will bring
02:39:34 Speaker 65: back. And so that's why they've
02:39:36 Speaker 65: removed that amendment. Thank you, sir.
02:39:38 Speaker 65: Is there a seconder for that?
02:39:40 Speaker 65: Councillor Dubreuil will second that motion
02:39:44 Speaker 65: on the amendment. is there any
02:39:46 Speaker 65: discussion, Councillor Apple? s I'm not
02:39:48 Speaker 65: clear on what that was. There
02:39:51 Speaker 65: was, what is? Can we get
02:39:53 Speaker 65: it up on the screen? Can
02:39:57 Speaker 65: everyone see that on their screen?
02:40:01 Speaker 65: okay, Councillor Apples, you're good with
02:40:04 Speaker 65: that, or are you under? Sorry,
02:40:06 Speaker 65: yes. If the amendment succeeds, then
02:40:08 Speaker 65: we'll we'll also put up the
02:40:10 Speaker 65: the amended motion. But for now,
02:40:13 Speaker 65: it's the amendment that's on the
02:40:15 Speaker 65: screen. Councillor Nielsen, thank you very
02:40:16 Speaker 65: much, Deputy Warden. Just for more
02:40:19 Speaker 65: clarity, for my. friends across the
02:40:21 Speaker 65: aisle. The premise here is, we
02:40:22 Speaker 65: need we need to receive a
02:40:25 Speaker 65: report on how going green and
02:40:29 Speaker 65: gray is working. It was established
02:40:30 Speaker 65: in 2022. My understanding from discussions
02:40:33 Speaker 65: with staff is that there is
02:40:36 Speaker 65: already an intent from staff to
02:40:44 Speaker 65: bring back a review of this
02:40:46 Speaker 65: programme, as we should with all
02:40:48 Speaker 66: big policy and big programmeming that
02:40:53 Speaker 66: the county puts on. The difference
02:40:57 Speaker 66: here is what we're asking staff
02:40:59 Speaker 09: to bring back. The motion that
02:41:00 Speaker 09: came out of the budget and
02:41:06 Speaker 09: finance committee. gives direction from two
02:41:10 Speaker 09: staff to bring back a report
02:41:13 Speaker 09: on removing us from going green,
02:41:17 Speaker 09: green and grey, without actually asking:
02:41:20 Speaker 09: Is it being successful? Are we
02:41:24 Speaker 09: seeing benefits? Is the investment coming
02:41:27 Speaker 09: in with to fruition? Is there
02:41:31 Speaker 09: certain aspects of going green and
02:41:34 Speaker 09: grey that maybe aren't working, but
02:41:36 Speaker 09: certain other ones are, and we
02:41:38 Speaker 09: should pivot our investment into those
02:41:44 Speaker 09: areas? The motion coming out of
02:41:47 Speaker 09: the Budget and Finance Committee is
02:41:49 Speaker 09: strictly remove it from the 2027
02:41:52 Speaker 09: budget, and to me, that is
02:41:55 Speaker 09: not getting the information. this county
02:41:58 Speaker 09: actually needs. So my motion is
02:42:00 Speaker 09: to change that direction and have
02:42:03 Speaker 09: staff bring back a clear direction
02:42:05 Speaker 09: and a clear report on the
02:42:07 Speaker 09: Folsom going green and gray, so
02:42:10 Speaker 09: that council then can make an
02:42:13 Speaker 09: informed decision on whether or not
02:42:14 Speaker 09: there's merits of changing the amount
02:42:17 Speaker 09: of investment we are making into
02:42:20 Speaker 09: this action. Councillor Gregg, I will
02:42:27 Speaker 09: oppose the changing of the wording.
02:42:28 Speaker 09: The the actual wording implication. The
02:42:30 Speaker 09: actual wording implications is appropriate because
02:42:33 Speaker 09: right now we have two positions
02:42:35 Speaker 09: which are grant funded. We are
02:42:38 Speaker 09: undertaking, and this is part of
02:42:40 Speaker 09: the conversation that we had at
02:42:41 Speaker 09: budget meeting. It initially was just
02:42:42 Speaker 09: to reflect the 2026 budget, and
02:42:45 Speaker 09: through discussion, we realized the conversation
02:42:46 Speaker 09: is so broad. There's it's multifaceted
02:42:50 Speaker 09: that we've got national grant funding
02:42:53 Speaker 09: programmemes that we're leveraging for EV
02:42:56 Speaker 09: charging stations. We've got partners that
02:42:58 Speaker 09: we've been working. with and the
02:43:00 Speaker 09: establishment of building standards, so we
02:43:03 Speaker 09: have some of these positions that
02:43:06 Speaker 09: right now are rate funded, not
02:43:11 Speaker 09: levy funded. They have a fixed
02:43:18 Speaker 09: funding date at this time. So
02:43:19 Speaker 09: I think for that reason, an
02:43:22 Speaker 09: updated review of the targets is
02:43:24 Speaker 09: not sufficient when you're actually wanting
02:43:26 Speaker 09: to reflect the intent of the
02:43:29 Speaker 09: the report coming forward. It's not
02:43:31 Speaker 08: automatically to remove it from the
02:43:34 Speaker 08: 2027 budget. it's a report back
02:43:37 Speaker 08: to council on the implications, and
02:43:40 Speaker 08: one of those implications, and it's
02:43:41 Speaker 08: not a target. One of the
02:43:43 Speaker 08: implications could be we've lost that
02:43:45 Speaker 08: revenue, that grant funding stream. So
02:43:47 Speaker 08: the implication now is it's going
02:44:15 Speaker 08: to fall onto the levy because
02:44:17 Speaker 08: someone's going to pay for it.
02:44:19 Speaker 67: And as a council, now you're
02:44:20 Speaker 60: having a whole different discussion about
02:44:22 Speaker 60: the report than you're going to
02:44:25 Speaker 60: have when you're just having an.
02:44:26 Speaker 60: updated review of the targets because
02:44:29 Speaker 60: an updated review of the targets.
02:44:30 Speaker 60: That's almost a subjective, warm and
02:44:33 Speaker 60: cozy feeling about you know, do
02:44:34 Speaker 60: we like how much we've done?
02:44:37 Speaker 60: Could we do more? Yes. Is
02:44:38 Speaker 60: that good enough? Probably, maybe not.
02:44:41 Speaker 60: We don't know. But implications reflects
02:44:43 Speaker 60: better, and there is nothing that
02:44:46 Speaker 60: beholds the council to the removal.
02:44:48 Speaker 60: So to the removal or the
02:44:51 Speaker 60: continuation of it in the budget
02:44:54 Speaker 60: for 2027. At that point,
02:44:56 Speaker 60: you know, I could move for
02:45:00 Speaker 60: a budget that we buy cameras
02:45:02 Speaker 60: and put them over the highways
02:45:04 Speaker 60: so we have real-time camera for
02:45:07 Speaker 60: people for the public to go
02:45:08 Speaker 60: on and look at our roads.
02:45:10 Speaker 60: In you know, you as councillors,
02:45:11 Speaker 60: you can move anything, but a
02:45:19 Speaker 60: review of the targets does isn't
02:45:21 Speaker 60: as fulsome as the initial intent
02:45:22 Speaker 60: of that. reporting back should be,
02:45:25 Speaker 60: Councillor Dubreuil, please. Thank you, and
02:45:29 Speaker 60: through you to the to the
02:45:33 Speaker 60: question and to the original recommendation.
02:45:37 Speaker 09: The way it is worded implies
02:45:41 Speaker 09: that the Budget and Finance Committee
02:45:43 Speaker 09: is recommending we exit green and
02:45:46 Speaker 09: gray. I listened to the meeting,
02:45:49 Speaker 09: and. the wording is to bring
02:45:53 Speaker 09: back a report that specifically addresses
02:45:55 Speaker 09: the implications of exiting, going green
02:46:00 Speaker 09: and grey. It does not necessarily
02:46:03 Speaker 09: include a progress report on the
02:46:04 Speaker 09: successes of going green and grey.
02:46:07 Speaker 09: And my understanding was that staff
02:46:10 Speaker 09: always intended to councillor Nielsen's point.
02:46:13 Speaker 09: Lars Nielsen's point earlier, that staff
02:46:16 Speaker 09: would be bringing a progress report
02:46:18 Speaker 09: on going green and gray. It's
02:46:21 Speaker 09: a policy set by this body,
02:46:23 Speaker 68: and that progress report would allow
02:46:25 Speaker 68: us to have the information to
02:46:27 Speaker 68: determine whether or not we proceed,
02:46:29 Speaker 68: whether or not we stay with
02:46:32 Speaker 68: the status quo, or maybe we
02:46:33 Speaker 68: scale it back. But to bring
02:46:40 Speaker 68: a report. that only provides the
02:46:43 Speaker 68: implications of exiting, going green and
02:46:45 Speaker 68: gray doesn't give us a full
02:46:47 Speaker 38: picture or all of the information.
02:46:51 Speaker 38: So I understand the motion that
02:46:52 Speaker 38: Councillor Nielsen is putting forward is
02:46:54 Speaker 38: to review the targets established, but
02:46:56 Speaker 38: I don't think it goes far
02:46:57 Speaker 38: enough. Even then, I I. I'm
02:46:59 Speaker 38: not I'm not sure that I
02:47:02 Speaker 38: have a question or an. amendment
02:47:03 Speaker 38: at this time. I just think
02:47:05 Speaker 38: that that allowing the progress report
02:47:06 Speaker 38: to proceed as it was originally
02:47:07 Speaker 38: intended, so that we have the
02:47:09 Speaker 38: information, and at that point in
02:47:10 Speaker 38: time we can decide whether or
02:47:12 Speaker 38: not this is a programme that
02:47:14 Speaker 38: we want to continue. I guess
02:47:16 Speaker 38: my actually I do have a
02:47:18 Speaker 38: question through Deputy Warden. Does the
02:47:20 Speaker 38: Budget and Finance Committee, in its
02:47:23 Speaker 38: terms of reference, allow for them
02:47:25 Speaker 38: to or is it within their
02:47:26 Speaker 38: purview to make recommendations to exit
02:47:29 Speaker 38: a policy that was set by
02:47:32 Speaker 38: this by this body, regardless of
02:47:35 Speaker 38: whether it's a financial, the financial
02:47:36 Speaker 38: piece, the budget piece. I guess
02:47:38 Speaker 38: I would say, as chair of
02:47:40 Speaker 38: that particular committee, lucky me. I
02:47:41 Speaker 38: would say that the the committee
02:47:43 Speaker 38: has not. actually put forward the
02:47:46 Speaker 38: motion to exit the programme. The
02:47:48 Speaker 38: motion, as Councillor Greg rightly pointed
02:47:49 Speaker 38: out, the motion that was supported
02:47:52 Speaker 38: was to request a report on
02:47:54 Speaker 38: the implications of leaving the programme.
02:47:56 Speaker 38: And in that respect, I think
02:47:58 Speaker 38: the committee is within their purview.
02:47:59 Speaker 38: Although I'll defer to the clerk
02:48:02 Speaker 38: or the CEO on that particular
02:48:03 Speaker 38: matter. Thank you, Tara, and and
02:48:06 Speaker 38: and through you, Deputy Warden. Uh,
02:48:07 Speaker 38: so just looking at the terms
02:48:11 Speaker 38: of reference, just uh outline the
02:48:12 Speaker 38: scope of responsibility for the budget
02:48:14 Speaker 38: and finance. Committee shall include providing
02:48:16 Speaker 38: input in the creation of the
02:48:19 Speaker 38: county's first multi-year operating budget, that
02:48:20 Speaker 38: was of course in context of
02:48:22 Speaker 38: last year, reviewing the draft operating
02:48:24 Speaker 38: capital budget documents prior to preparation
02:48:25 Speaker 38: of the budget package for council,
02:48:27 Speaker 38: reviewing operating capital budget reports on
02:48:28 Speaker 38: a quarterly basis, recommending the annual
02:48:30 Speaker 38: schedule for capital and operating budget
02:48:33 Speaker 38: preparation and presentation for council approval,
02:48:34 Speaker 38: reviewing financial and fiscal policies, practices,
02:48:38 Speaker 38: and procedures as required. review reports
02:48:39 Speaker 38: with significant financial focus, such as
02:48:41 Speaker 38: development charges revenue, development charges background
02:48:43 Speaker 38: study, investment revenue, reserve fund studies,
02:48:47 Speaker 38: and review the strategic asset management
02:48:50 Speaker 38: plan and policies, and make recommendations
02:48:52 Speaker 38: to council. So that's the list
02:48:54 Speaker 38: of the scope of responsibility with
02:48:56 Speaker 38: respect to the budget finance committee.
02:48:58 Speaker 38: It's part of the terms of
02:49:00 Speaker 22: reference. So I would suggest. that
02:49:03 Speaker 22: yes, they're within their purview to
02:49:05 Speaker 22: put forward the motion that is
02:49:10 Speaker 22: on the floor, or the original
02:49:11 Speaker 22: motion, Councillor Debrine. So I suppose
02:49:14 Speaker 22: that my my question is more
02:49:16 Speaker 22: to: Is this original motion tainting
02:49:18 Speaker 22: the report to only include the
02:49:19 Speaker 22: implications of exiting going green and
02:49:20 Speaker 22: gray, as opposed to a progress
02:49:22 Speaker 22: report on the benefits? the progress
02:49:24 Speaker 22: to date, and recommendations at that
02:49:25 Speaker 22: point in time of whether or
02:49:27 Speaker 22: not to continue with our trajectory
02:49:28 Speaker 22: or scale back or remove. My
02:49:34 Speaker 22: concern is that this is too
02:49:36 Speaker 22: limiting a focus for staff, in
02:49:39 Speaker 22: that the this body will not
02:49:40 Speaker 22: get a fulsome picture of going
02:49:42 Speaker 60: green and gray and its progress.
02:49:44 Speaker 60: I guess in response, I would
02:49:46 Speaker 60: say that budget ultimately is always
02:49:49 Speaker 60: a decision of council, and the
02:49:53 Speaker 60: budget and committee, or budget and
02:49:54 Speaker 60: finance committee, is simply an advisory
02:49:56 Speaker 60: committee to make recommendations, and that's
02:49:58 Speaker 60: what they've done. Okay, Councillor Mackey
02:50:00 Speaker 60: is next, and then I have
02:50:03 Speaker 60: Councillor McQueen, and then Councillor Carlton.
02:50:04 Speaker 60: Thank you, Deputy Warden. Yeah, I'm
02:50:06 Speaker 60: I'm torn on the on the.
02:50:08 Speaker 60: wording too because there is the
02:50:10 Speaker 60: implication of actually removing a cost-benefit
02:50:13 Speaker 60: analysis on any programme that we
02:50:14 Speaker 60: have. I think is important. I'm
02:50:17 Speaker 60: not sure right now what benefits
02:50:19 Speaker 60: we are getting. I know what
02:50:22 Speaker 60: the costs are. I know there's
02:50:24 Speaker 60: an affordability crisis out there. We're
02:50:28 Speaker 60: all dealing with our lower-tier budgets,
02:50:30 Speaker 60: and we're putting off work because
02:50:31 Speaker 60: we can't afford to do it.
02:50:34 Speaker 60: So roads aren't getting done because
02:50:37 Speaker 60: we got we got to keep
02:50:40 Speaker 60: a tax rate you know below
02:50:43 Speaker 60: a certain percent because people can't
02:50:46 Speaker 60: afford a huge one. We know
02:50:48 Speaker 60: we're at six point nine percent
02:50:50 Speaker 60: right now, and budget and finance
02:50:51 Speaker 60: was tasked with looking at ways
02:50:54 Speaker 60: to reduce that. I pay a
02:50:56 Speaker 60: lot of income tax to the
02:50:58 Speaker 60: government. I pay a lot to
02:50:59 Speaker 60: the Ontario government. All who have
02:51:03 Speaker 60: climate change initiatives, property taxes continue
02:51:05 Speaker 60: to go up. You know, probably
02:51:08 Speaker 60: at a rate higher than any
02:51:09 Speaker 60: of us would like. And I
02:51:12 Speaker 60: hear from a number of seniors,
02:51:13 Speaker 60: and not not just seniors, but
02:51:14 Speaker 60: people in general. that can't afford
02:51:16 Speaker 60: these significant tax increases. So it's
02:51:18 Speaker 60: difficult to try and reduce any
02:51:20 Speaker 60: programme because there's merits to all
02:51:22 Speaker 60: the programmemes that we have throughout
02:51:24 Speaker 60: the county. But as Councillor Aclo
02:51:26 Speaker 60: said, there is our lane to
02:51:30 Speaker 60: stay within. And you know what
02:51:32 Speaker 60: are we supposed to be doing?
02:51:34 Speaker 60: We have social services, we have
02:51:35 Speaker 60: ambulance, we have bridges, we have
02:51:36 Speaker 60: roads, we have lots of mandatory
02:51:37 Speaker 60: long-term care. We have lots of
02:51:39 Speaker 60: mandatory services that continue to require.
02:51:42 Speaker 60: more and more funds. We hear
02:51:43 Speaker 60: about the downloading from the problems.
02:51:48 Speaker 60: Yes, that's happening all the time.
02:51:51 Speaker 60: We can't control that. Going green
02:51:55 Speaker 60: and gray is one thing that
02:51:56 Speaker 60: we have some control over. So
02:51:57 Speaker 60: knowing if that programme is working
02:51:58 Speaker 60: when we are spending a lot
02:52:00 Speaker 60: of money, and I do know
02:52:02 Speaker 22: that we will be spending more
02:52:03 Speaker 22: and more as we get deeper
02:52:05 Speaker 22: into that programme. So that's why
02:52:07 Speaker 22: I think a thorough review of
02:52:09 Speaker 22: going green and gray is necessary.
02:52:11 Speaker 22: You know, to look. after the
02:52:12 Speaker 22: best interest of our tax code.
02:52:13 Speaker 22: There's one person paying the tab,
02:52:14 Speaker 22: and someone can't afford it. Thank
02:52:16 Speaker 22: you. Thank you, sir. Councillor McQueen
02:52:17 Speaker 22: is next. I don't disagree with
02:52:19 Speaker 22: Councillor Mackey in the sense of
02:52:21 Speaker 22: taxes and keeping them down, and
02:52:23 Speaker 22: I I just wonder. This is
02:52:25 Speaker 22: a question to the amended motion
02:52:28 Speaker 22: that should it say also the
02:52:29 Speaker 22: targets establishment, growing, going green and
02:52:31 Speaker 22: gray, and also a financial model
02:52:34 Speaker 22: presented. Model be presented, or the
02:52:36 Speaker 22: financial, the financials of it, or
02:52:37 Speaker 22: or the or the funding. However,
02:52:41 Speaker 22: going to my colleague, Councillor Greg,
02:52:42 Speaker 22: and you mentioned about the funding
02:52:44 Speaker 22: and some of that. I think
02:52:45 Speaker 22: it would be good for us
02:52:47 Speaker 22: to have that information in that
02:52:48 Speaker 22: report, or maybe it's maybe it
02:52:49 Speaker 22: would come back in that report.
02:52:52 Speaker 22: It doesn't need to be in
02:52:54 Speaker 22: the motion. I'm asking for clarity
02:52:58 Speaker 22: on that part. Thank you, and
02:53:00 Speaker 22: through you, Deputy Warden. with respect
02:53:02 Speaker 69: to and so since since obviously,
02:53:04 Speaker 70: Budget and Finance Committee staff have
02:53:06 Speaker 70: had a chance to take a
02:53:09 Speaker 70: look at some of the previous
02:53:12 Speaker 70: motions passed by Council with respect
02:53:14 Speaker 70: to when the first going green
02:53:15 Speaker 70: and grey plan was was first
02:53:17 Speaker 70: established, and I'll just read the
02:53:20 Speaker 70: one motion that that was passed
02:53:22 Speaker 70: in 2022 that the climate change
02:53:24 Speaker 70: action plan and a net zero
02:53:26 Speaker 70: greenhouse gas emissions target by 2050
02:53:28 Speaker 70: be endorsed to help guide corporate
02:53:31 Speaker 70: strategic plans. and priorities, and that
02:53:35 Speaker 70: staff also be directed to explore
02:53:37 Speaker 70: more aggressive corporate target dates and
02:53:38 Speaker 70: bring updated target reviews each term
02:53:41 Speaker 70: of council. So, in order to
02:53:42 Speaker 70: inform each term of council, as
02:53:45 Speaker 70: part of some of the work
02:53:47 Speaker 70: plan considerations for 2026, based on
02:53:49 Speaker 70: based on staff discussions, we would
02:53:52 Speaker 70: be bringing forward a review of
02:53:55 Speaker 70: of the of the overall programme.
02:54:01 Speaker 02: As part of that overall programme,
02:54:04 Speaker 02: we'd be looking at the financial
02:54:06 Speaker 02: Programme would be looking at the
02:54:11 Speaker 56: financial aspects with respect to the
02:54:14 Speaker 56: overall programme, where there's there's where
02:54:18 Speaker 56: we've seen some some great success,
02:54:21 Speaker 56: where there's opportunity to maybe tweak
02:54:23 Speaker 56: some some some items, where there's
02:54:24 Speaker 56: maybe some further emphasis that should
02:54:30 Speaker 56: be provided in certain areas, based
02:54:31 Speaker 56: on where we have seen some
02:54:38 Speaker 56: more success than maybe other areas.
02:54:40 Speaker 56: So that would be part of
02:54:42 Speaker 56: that work plan, anyways, as part
02:54:48 Speaker 56: of the progress report based on
02:54:49 Speaker 56: that previous motion. and so so
02:54:51 Speaker 56: with that, I think in terms
02:54:54 Speaker 56: of the reviewing the overall target
02:54:57 Speaker 56: reviews is looking at the overall
02:55:00 Speaker 56: progress of of that prior to
02:55:03 Speaker 56: the next term of council. In
02:55:05 Speaker 56: order to do that, the work
02:55:06 Speaker 56: has to be done in 2026
02:55:09 Speaker 56: in order to inform what that
02:55:11 Speaker 56: may look like from a financial
02:55:15 Speaker 56: perspective and what's included as part
02:55:17 Speaker 56: of the work plans going forward
02:55:18 Speaker 56: in 2027 and 2028 to help
02:55:21 Speaker 56: inform those proposed budgets. So so
02:55:22 Speaker 56: that's where again, upon further reflection,
02:55:24 Speaker 56: staff looked at some of those
02:55:27 Speaker 56: pieces. We've looked at then. This
02:55:30 Speaker 56: is something that we would already
02:55:35 Speaker 56: have to do as part of
02:55:39 Speaker 56: the work plan. It's part of
02:55:41 Speaker 56: the previous direction from council, and
02:55:45 Speaker 56: and so that's something that I
02:55:48 Speaker 56: think would be part of that
02:55:52 Speaker 56: review coming forward, unless again, otherwise,
02:55:55 Speaker 56: as further directed by County Council.
02:56:00 Speaker 56: You, Mister Deputy Warden, thank you
02:56:02 Speaker 56: for that clarity because then we
02:56:07 Speaker 56: don't have to add more words.
02:56:10 Speaker 56: I just need that. More words
02:56:14 Speaker 56: that just need that clear. Just
02:56:16 Speaker 56: one other comment I do want
02:56:21 Speaker 56: to make was when I became
02:56:25 Speaker 56: warden in December of 2019. One
02:56:26 Speaker 56: of the first things I brought
02:56:30 Speaker 56: forward was the suggestion of creating
02:56:33 Speaker 56: a climate change committee in this
02:56:35 Speaker 56: body, and it was it was
02:56:37 Speaker 56: endorsed. And we started. That's where
02:56:41 Speaker 56: we sort of started. I know
02:56:43 Speaker 56: some of those that were maybe
02:56:44 Speaker 56: back that time, and that was
02:56:48 Speaker 56: sort of the start of us
02:56:50 Speaker 56: looking at climate change as a
02:56:51 Speaker 56: as a county council and and
02:56:53 Speaker 56: all that stuff, and sort of
02:56:55 Speaker 56: transferred to maybe where you're talking
02:56:57 Speaker 56: about. Mr. Ciel and that sort
02:57:02 Speaker 56: of thing, but I mean this
02:57:04 Speaker 56: body has sort of has has
02:57:07 Speaker 56: endorsed the the concept of looking
02:57:13 Speaker 56: at it right back to that
02:57:15 Speaker 56: days of of those committees and
02:57:17 Speaker 56: that committee went through 2020, and
02:57:22 Speaker 56: you know what happened in 2020,
02:57:25 Speaker 56: but it still stayed the course.
02:57:29 Speaker 56: I mean, COVID hit and we
02:57:31 Speaker 56: had to beer off and stuff
02:57:34 Speaker 56: like that, but we certainly started.
02:57:37 Speaker 56: That's where it started with the
02:57:40 Speaker 56: committee and recommendations that came forward.
02:57:42 Speaker 56: So thank you, Mr. Deputy. Work,
02:57:43 Speaker 56: Councillor Carlton. Thank you, Deputy Warden,
02:57:45 Speaker 56: and I think our CAO answered
02:57:47 Speaker 56: part of my concern is that
02:57:59 Speaker 56: we're putting a motion on the
02:58:01 Speaker 56: floor that was already dealt with
02:58:02 Speaker 56: through the original plan to do
02:58:03 Speaker 56: those progress updates as we went
02:58:06 Speaker 65: forward, and I think we're circumventing
02:58:10 Speaker 65: that report and trying to focus
02:58:11 Speaker 65: it in a direction maybe it
02:58:13 Speaker 65: wasn't intended to go. My second
02:58:17 Speaker 65: comment would relate to comments about
02:58:18 Speaker 65: what our role is here. at
02:58:19 Speaker 02: the county, and I think it's
02:58:21 Speaker 02: a two-part. We have a role
02:58:23 Speaker 02: to manage things for the better
02:58:24 Speaker 02: of our residents now with what's
02:58:29 Speaker 02: needed now, but we also have
02:58:32 Speaker 02: a role to play in planning
02:58:34 Speaker 02: for their future and ensuring that
02:58:36 Speaker 02: the future is going to be
02:58:37 Speaker 02: one that's affordable. And I think
02:58:39 Speaker 02: being aware of climate change and
02:58:40 Speaker 02: what needs to happen there is
02:58:42 Speaker 71: important. I'll end with that. Thank
02:58:44 Speaker 71: you, Councillor Carleton. Any other discussion,
02:58:46 Speaker 71: Councillor Eccles, and then Councillor Debrine.
02:58:48 Speaker 71: Thank you, Mr. Warden. Today, I
02:58:51 Speaker 71: guess I'm reading this a lot
02:58:52 Speaker 71: different. The implications of removing and
02:58:54 Speaker 71: getting dealing just with the amendment.
02:58:56 Speaker 71: The implications of removing when I
02:58:58 Speaker 71: voted for this and whatnot. was
02:59:00 Speaker 71: pretty much what Randy had said
02:59:01 Speaker 71: there a few minutes ago, Mr.
02:59:04 Speaker 71: CEO. It's not about yes, what
02:59:08 Speaker 71: implications or what's going to happen
02:59:10 Speaker 71: if this was removed. Out, I
02:59:12 Speaker 71: could go with fine. Let's change
02:59:13 Speaker 71: the word and say the implications
02:59:15 Speaker 71: of maintaining going in green. It's
02:59:16 Speaker 71: one of the other. You're going.
02:59:18 Speaker 71: One or the other. You're going
02:59:19 Speaker 71: to have to. I would expect,
02:59:21 Speaker 71: and I had expected staff to
02:59:22 Speaker 71: do the implications of removing. We're
02:59:26 Speaker 71: going to lose, you know, some
02:59:27 Speaker 71: of the targets, whatever the target
02:59:29 Speaker 71: was. If we remove it, we
02:59:31 Speaker 71: may not, you know, we're not
02:59:33 Speaker 71: going to have it. And to
02:59:34 Speaker 71: get to that point, I think
02:59:36 Speaker 71: we got. It's the understanding, and
02:59:37 Speaker 71: my understanding of it was to
02:59:38 Speaker 71: give us a report. If we
02:59:40 Speaker 71: remove it, yeah, this is going
02:59:41 Speaker 71: to happen. It's going to have
02:59:42 Speaker 71: this implication on the budget. It's
02:59:44 Speaker 71: going to have implications of where
02:59:46 Speaker 71: we, you know, got to going
02:59:48 Speaker 71: green and gray. But it's not
02:59:56 Speaker 71: about just the report. Would be
02:59:57 Speaker 71: very limited if it was just
02:59:59 Speaker 71: about the financial or the impact
03:00:03 Speaker 72: of removing. The impact of remove—it's
03:00:04 Speaker 72: got to be what we would
03:00:06 Speaker 72: lose as well. So the idea
03:00:07 Speaker 72: of this amendment, the amendments—I think—changing
03:00:10 Speaker 72: it altogether. It's just focusing in
03:00:11 Speaker 72: on review of the targets. I
03:00:12 Speaker 72: want a full review, a full
03:00:14 Speaker 72: of what this means with this
03:00:15 Speaker 72: programme. If we remove it. yeah,
03:00:18 Speaker 72: we're going to gain this, this,
03:00:20 Speaker 72: and this. Possibly, financially, whatever. But
03:00:23 Speaker 72: if we remove it, we're going
03:00:24 Speaker 72: to lose this, this, and this.
03:00:25 Speaker 72: Would be in the report. So
03:00:27 Speaker 72: the thought that this motion is
03:00:30 Speaker 72: saying, oh, we're only going to
03:00:32 Speaker 72: find out what, you know, the
03:00:34 Speaker 72: bad part. No, the report. I
03:00:35 Speaker 72: would hope that staff will bring
03:00:38 Speaker 72: it to. us with all of
03:00:43 Speaker 72: the data. If it makes you
03:00:44 Speaker 72: feel better, I'm not going to
03:00:45 Speaker 72: vote for the amendment. I'm going
03:00:49 Speaker 72: to oppose it because I think
03:00:50 Speaker 72: it changes. It's not an amendment;
03:00:54 Speaker 72: it just changes the whole motion.
03:00:55 Speaker 72: I would put forward a amendment.
03:00:59 Speaker 14: If whatever happens with this one,
03:01:03 Speaker 14: I would put forward fine. The
03:01:06 Speaker 14: implications of maintaining. Because it may
03:01:09 Speaker 09: come out that maintaining going in
03:01:11 Speaker 09: green is going to do us
03:01:13 Speaker 09: wonderful things, and projected that we'll
03:01:19 Speaker 09: be saving the county millions of
03:01:22 Speaker 09: dollars. But one way or the
03:01:22 Speaker 09: other, it's just a word. the
03:01:27 Speaker 09: The report should be wholesome, full,
03:01:28 Speaker 09: and be going on both sides.
03:01:30 Speaker 09: And what Randy had said. and
03:01:33 Speaker 73: that was said in the committee
03:01:36 Speaker 73: that yes, there would be a
03:01:38 Speaker 73: report. I think this is just
03:01:40 Speaker 73: making sure that that doesn't get
03:01:42 Speaker 10: lost. Councillor Dubreuil. Point of order
03:01:43 Speaker 10: is that the member has already
03:01:44 Speaker 10: spoken to the amended motion on
03:01:46 Speaker 10: the floor once, as per our
03:01:48 Speaker 10: procedural bylaw. Unless there's indulgence, that
03:01:50 Speaker 10: council speak more so. Okay. I'll
03:01:51 Speaker 10: hold off on Councillor Debrine until
03:01:53 Speaker 10: anyone else else that hasn't spoken
03:01:54 Speaker 10: wishes to. To the amendment, Councillor
03:01:56 Speaker 10: Nielsen, I can't remember. Have you
03:01:57 Speaker 10: spoken to the amendment other than
03:01:59 Speaker 10: making the motion? I know you
03:02:01 Speaker 10: made the motion, so I'll I'll
03:02:04 Speaker 10: go past him as well. Councillor
03:02:05 Speaker 10: Borden, y'all, please. Thank you, Deputy
03:02:09 Speaker 10: Warden. Through you, I I think
03:02:10 Speaker 10: to count the Councillor Eccles' comments,
03:02:11 Speaker 10: it is a matter of wording.
03:02:12 Speaker 10: The amendment to me does not
03:02:14 Speaker 10: go far enough. because a review
03:02:15 Speaker 10: of targets is it going to
03:02:18 Speaker 10: be targets established and goals met?
03:02:21 Speaker 10: So if we're looking for a
03:02:22 Speaker 10: fulsome report, I think the initial
03:02:27 Speaker 10: motion we wouldn't have had this
03:02:28 Speaker 10: conversation. We said the implications removing
03:02:32 Speaker 10: or maintain me. It's it's a
03:02:35 Speaker 10: simple it's a simple word process
03:02:36 Speaker 10: that I think everybody wants a
03:02:39 Speaker 08: fulsome report. It's just a matter
03:02:42 Speaker 08: of I can't support the amendment
03:02:49 Speaker 08: only because it just says a
03:02:53 Speaker 08: review of targets that does nothing
03:02:56 Speaker 08: to to dictate a fulsome report.
03:02:57 Speaker 08: So. Some report, so I think
03:03:00 Speaker 08: it's just a matter of if
03:03:02 Speaker 39: it was removing or or maintaining,
03:03:07 Speaker 39: then we get a full report.
03:03:11 Speaker 39: What are our targets? What have
03:03:12 Speaker 39: we met? How this will affect
03:03:17 Speaker 39: us as we go forward? That
03:03:23 Speaker 74: that's the kind of report I
03:03:25 Speaker 74: I'd like to see. the the
03:03:27 Speaker 74: The amendment to it to me
03:03:29 Speaker 74: does not go far enough in
03:03:32 Speaker 74: to the original recommendation of the
03:03:34 Speaker 74: of the of the group. And
03:03:42 Speaker 74: just as a last point, is
03:04:03 Speaker 74: I I'm happy that the group
03:04:10 Speaker 74: meets and and the committee and
03:04:16 Speaker 49: makes recommendations because. there's still 18
03:04:20 Speaker 75: people to make the decision on
03:04:44 Speaker 75: that. It's just a at a
03:04:47 Speaker 75: local level when you have a
03:04:50 Speaker 75: committee of council, they bring it
03:04:52 Speaker 02: to all of council, which we're
03:04:54 Speaker 02: doing today. So I have no
03:04:56 Speaker 02: problem with any committee making recommendations
03:04:59 Speaker 02: to this council. That's just my
03:05:02 Speaker 02: comments, Mr. Warden. Thank you, sir.
03:05:06 Speaker 02: Anyone else, Councillor Deckard? Please. Thank
03:05:07 Speaker 02: you, Deputy Warden. As I reflect
03:05:12 Speaker 02: back on on that meeting, you
03:05:15 Speaker 02: know the discussion that we had.
03:05:16 Speaker 02: varied from just saying no, we
03:05:22 Speaker 02: want to. Our proposal would be
03:05:28 Speaker 02: to cut it to actually coming
03:05:34 Speaker 02: back to to staff and saying
03:05:37 Speaker 02: we need to know the implications
03:05:40 Speaker 02: of cutting it. And I think
03:05:53 Speaker 02: that's really what our desire was
03:06:18 Speaker 02: here. It is so we were
03:06:20 Speaker 49: making an educated decision down the
03:06:21 Speaker 01: road, and and therefore you know
03:06:22 Speaker 08: the motion as it was presented
03:06:24 Speaker 08: in from the meeting minutes, I
03:06:26 Speaker 08: think is is really gets us
03:06:28 Speaker 08: to where we want it to
03:06:30 Speaker 08: be. If we all recognized around
03:06:33 Speaker 08: that table, we need to know
03:06:37 Speaker 08: more about what this action would
03:06:39 Speaker 08: do. So I, I can't support
03:06:42 Speaker 09: the amendment. I would support the
03:06:44 Speaker 09: original motion. Okay, thank you, sir,
03:06:51 Speaker 09: Councillor Hutchison. Well, thank you, Deputy
03:06:53 Speaker 09: Warden. This time, I'd like to
03:06:55 Speaker 09: call the vote, please. Is there
03:06:56 Speaker 02: is there anyone else that has
03:06:58 Speaker 02: not spoken to the motion yet,
03:07:00 Speaker 02: the amendment? I'm going to go
03:07:02 Speaker 02: back to Councillor Debrine if no
03:07:09 Speaker 02: one else. Councillor Debrine. my question
03:07:11 Speaker 02: through you, Deputy Warden, was more
03:07:13 Speaker 02: of on procedure. I am uncom.
03:07:14 Speaker 02: I'm not totally sold on the
03:07:22 Speaker 02: amendment, and I wanted to understand
03:07:30 Speaker 02: from the clerk procedure of an
03:08:04 Speaker 02: amendment. But I will just allow
03:08:06 Speaker 02: the the question to be called,
03:08:12 Speaker 02: and I can propose an amendment.
03:08:15 Speaker 02: Okay, Councillor Nielsen, I give you
03:08:17 Speaker 02: the last word. You. Neilson, I
03:08:18 Speaker 02: give you the last word. You
03:08:20 Speaker 02: were the motion. You made the
03:08:23 Speaker 02: motion for the amendment. I actually
03:08:26 Speaker 02: really appreciate that, Chair. The wording
03:08:27 Speaker 02: of the motion. I understand and
03:08:29 Speaker 02: respect the conversation we're having, which
03:08:30 Speaker 02: is exact, which is fantastic, actually.
03:08:32 Speaker 02: The motion was working with staff
03:08:33 Speaker 02: to try to find a motion
03:09:46 Speaker 02: that would amendment that would work
03:09:48 Speaker 02: to get to the place where
03:09:49 Speaker 76: we were before this motion. The
03:09:51 Speaker 77: motion from the budget and finance
03:09:53 Speaker 77: committee came. That staff have already
03:09:54 Speaker 77: have the direction to bring forward
03:09:57 Speaker 77: a report. That's the goal of
03:09:58 Speaker 77: the. motion. That was the goal.
03:10:01 Speaker 77: The wording was working with staff
03:10:03 Speaker 77: to bring that forward. So, if
03:10:05 Speaker 46: if council's position is they want
03:10:08 Speaker 46: to move a motion to have
03:10:10 Speaker 46: implications of one or the other,
03:10:11 Speaker 46: or if the council wants to
03:10:14 Speaker 46: have the report that staff are
03:10:16 Speaker 46: already working on, is kind of
03:10:21 Speaker 46: where we're standing here. My motion
03:10:25 Speaker 46: is trying to direct staff to
03:10:27 Speaker 46: keep carrying carrying on with the
03:10:29 Speaker 46: direction they've already received, rather than
03:10:31 Speaker 09: having a different report come forward
03:10:33 Speaker 09: that has different implications. Okay, I'm
03:10:36 Speaker 09: going to call the question on
03:10:38 Speaker 09: the amendment. All those in favour?
03:10:39 Speaker 09: Opposed? That motion fails. So now
03:10:42 Speaker 09: we're back to the amended, or
03:10:50 Speaker 09: back to the original motion, as
03:10:52 Speaker 09: unamended. Councillor Debrine, please. I'd like
03:10:53 Speaker 09: to propose an amendment that just
03:10:54 Speaker 09: disappeared. Sorry. That says that in
03:10:57 Speaker 08: keeping. with the goal, is that
03:10:59 Speaker 08: staff bring a progress report on
03:11:00 Speaker 08: the targets established and the cost
03:11:01 Speaker 08: analysis of going green and grey
03:11:02 Speaker 08: to be presented prior to or
03:11:04 Speaker 08: in consideration of the 2027 budget?
03:11:06 Speaker 08: Okay, thank you. Is there a
03:11:07 Speaker 08: seconder for that motion, Councillor Mackay?
03:11:13 Speaker 08: It's so close. It's close. Well,
03:11:14 Speaker 08: we're getting on here. I need,
03:11:18 Speaker 08: I need lunch. Anyway, okay. It's
03:13:19 Speaker 08: been moved and seconded. Discussion on
03:19:30 Speaker 08: the amendment. We'll wait until. Can
03:42:18 Speaker 08: we get it up on the
03:48:28 Speaker 08: screen? Maybe restate your your amendment,
03:53:46 Speaker 08: please, Councillor Debrine. Let staff prepare
03:56:23 Speaker 08: a report on the targets. So,
03:56:26 Speaker 08: remove the implications of removing, and
03:56:27 Speaker 08: replace it with the targets. and
03:56:31 Speaker 08: cost analysis. So, in consultation with
03:56:35 Speaker 01: the clerk, she is suggesting that
03:56:37 Speaker 01: we. have already voted down the
03:56:46 Speaker 01: notion of a report on the
03:56:48 Speaker 01: targets, but if you would revise
03:56:50 Speaker 01: your motion, your amendment to just
03:56:58 Speaker 01: include the financial implications, then that
03:57:00 Speaker 08: would be sufficient. That was my
03:57:03 Speaker 08: goal. Thank you. All right, we'll
03:57:05 Speaker 08: get this onto the screen here.
03:57:08 Speaker 08: Ah, yeah, no kidding, no kidding.
03:57:12 Speaker 08: I'm going to be talking to
03:57:16 Speaker 08: the warden after this. I can
03:57:19 Speaker 08: tell you that her timing is.
03:57:22 Speaker 08: I'm having fun. I don't know
03:57:24 Speaker 08: about the rest of you. We'll
03:57:26 Speaker 08: get there. We'll get there. Good
03:57:29 Speaker 08: discussion. I haven't got any other
03:57:32 Speaker 08: stories right now. Uh huh. Uh
03:57:33 Speaker 08: huh. Okay, I'll read the motion
03:57:35 Speaker 08: back. It's, I believe it's on
03:57:37 Speaker 08: the screen. Yes, it is. That
03:57:42 Speaker 08: the motion be amended to insert
03:57:44 Speaker 08: a clause requesting staff to bring
03:57:47 Speaker 08: forward a report on the financials
03:57:50 Speaker 08: of going green and gray prior
03:57:52 Speaker 08: to the consideration of the 2027
03:57:55 Speaker 08: budget. Does that meet your description?
03:57:56 Speaker 08: Go ahead. Point of clarification, then,
03:57:58 Speaker 08: where is that being inserted? Because
03:58:00 Speaker 08: it's important to understand that. it's
03:58:06 Speaker 08: a progress report on the targets
03:58:10 Speaker 08: as well. So, well, it's not
03:58:11 Speaker 08: the the the piece about the
03:58:16 Speaker 08: targets is not being inserted because
03:58:20 Speaker 08: that was not part of the
03:58:23 Speaker 08: original motion, and the piece about
03:58:26 Speaker 08: the targets was already voted on
03:58:29 Speaker 08: and lost, so we can't include
03:58:32 Speaker 08: that. And it's covered in the
03:58:33 Speaker 08: twenty two twenty twenty. two motion,
03:58:35 Speaker 08: the direction that was all already
03:58:37 Speaker 08: given, so that is kind of
03:58:40 Speaker 08: taken care of, so to speak.
03:58:42 Speaker 08: So, where are we inserting this
03:58:45 Speaker 08: clause, and what are we removing?
03:58:46 Speaker 08: It's being suggested that we break
03:58:47 Speaker 10: for lunch. but it it kind
03:58:49 Speaker 10: of defeats the the notion that
03:58:52 Speaker 10: we have. As you you know,
03:58:53 Speaker 10: we have people interested in the
03:58:55 Speaker 10: gallery. I was hoping we could
03:58:56 Speaker 10: deal with this report prior to
03:58:58 Speaker 10: lunch, so that folks wouldn't have
03:59:00 Speaker 10: to come back. Just before I
03:59:03 Speaker 10: go to you, Councillor Nielsen, the
03:59:07 Speaker 10: clerk is still trying to. I
03:59:11 Speaker 10: want to get this motion on
03:59:14 Speaker 10: the floor or on the screen
03:59:17 Speaker 10: first before we go any further.
03:59:19 Speaker 10: Maybe. Yep. Thank you for your
03:59:22 Speaker 10: indulgence on that. While we suggested
03:59:24 Speaker 10: a spot to insert that amendment,
03:59:26 Speaker 10: so where you read the motion
03:59:28 Speaker 10: be amended, insert the clause directing
03:59:30 Speaker 10: staff to bring forward a report
03:59:33 Speaker 10: on the financials of going green
03:59:35 Speaker 10: and gray. That's the proposed amendment
03:59:37 Speaker 60: and the highlight. And the highlighted
03:59:40 Speaker 60: section underneath is what that would
03:59:43 Speaker 60: look like if it went through.
03:59:47 Speaker 60: So that's staff repair report and
03:59:51 Speaker 60: the implications of moving going green
03:59:54 Speaker 60: gray and bring forward a report
03:59:56 Speaker 60: on the financials for consideration prior
03:59:59 Speaker 60: to the 2027 budget is what
04:00:05 Speaker 60: staff have suggested. But looking for
04:00:06 Speaker 60: further input if if required. That's
04:00:09 Speaker 60: not exactly what I intended. We're
04:00:10 Speaker 60: kind of repeating what we're saying.
04:00:13 Speaker 14: Eating what we're saying, asking for
04:00:15 Speaker 14: a report on the implications of
04:00:16 Speaker 14: removing going green and gray. My
04:00:21 Speaker 14: intent was to the staff to
04:00:22 Speaker 14: bring the report they intended to
04:00:24 Speaker 14: bring in the first place, that
04:00:27 Speaker 14: included the financial implications of that
04:00:29 Speaker 14: plan. But I. Okay, I'm going
04:00:33 Speaker 14: to suggest we're going to break
04:00:35 Speaker 14: for lunch so that we can
04:00:38 Speaker 14: get this sorted out. This is
04:00:41 Speaker 14: why it's appreciated if you want
04:00:45 Speaker 14: amendments or. otherwise, bring them to
04:00:48 Speaker 14: the clerk prior to the meeting
04:00:50 Speaker 14: so that we're not trying to
04:00:52 Speaker 14: do this on the fly. I
04:00:54 Speaker 14: can appreciate how the discussion has
04:00:55 Speaker 14: unfolded, but let's break for lunch
04:00:56 Speaker 14: and we'll come back with the
04:00:57 Speaker 14: amended motion. Let's try to be
04:01:00 Speaker 14: back by say one forty, and
04:01:04 Speaker 14: I apologize to the gallery. Okay.
04:01:07 Speaker 14: One minute warning. Okay. thank you,
04:01:10 Speaker 14: Rob. We'll bring the meeting back
04:01:15 Speaker 10: to order. I trust everybody got
04:01:16 Speaker 10: a few bites, at least. So
04:01:17 Speaker 10: we're back to the proposed. amendment
04:01:18 Speaker 10: to the main motion. The amendment
04:01:21 Speaker 10: is okay. So the motion has
04:01:23 Speaker 10: not been actually made yet. So,
04:01:25 Speaker 10: Councillor Debrine, are you prepared to
04:01:27 Speaker 78: move the motion to amend? Thank
04:01:28 Speaker 19: you. Through you, if I could
04:01:30 Speaker 19: see what we finally landed on.
04:01:32 Speaker 19: I think I would like to
04:01:35 Speaker 19: move the motion. Okay, so the
04:01:38 Speaker 19: amendment is proposed to be to
04:01:42 Speaker 19: insert in the main motion, modifying
04:01:44 Speaker 10: or maintaining the actions within. So
04:01:47 Speaker 10: the the the amended motion would
04:01:48 Speaker 10: read that staff prepare a report
04:01:50 Speaker 10: on the implications of removing, and
04:01:52 Speaker 10: then the amendment starts modifying or
04:01:54 Speaker 10: maintaining the actions. That's the end
04:01:58 Speaker 10: of the or within. That's the
04:02:06 Speaker 19: end of the amendment, and then
04:02:07 Speaker 19: the Going Green and Gray Initiative
04:02:12 Speaker 19: for the consideration of the 2027
04:02:13 Speaker 19: budget. I so move. Is there
04:02:14 Speaker 19: a seconder? Councillor Carlton will second
04:02:17 Speaker 19: that. Thank you. Any discussion on
04:02:18 Speaker 19: the amendment? Not seeing any. I'll
04:02:20 Speaker 19: call the question. All those in
04:02:22 Speaker 19: favour? That is carried. Now we're
04:02:25 Speaker 76: back to the motion, the original
04:02:28 Speaker 76: motion as amended. Do I need
04:02:30 Speaker 76: to read it again? Okay. Any
04:02:33 Speaker 08: discussion on the motion as amended?
04:02:34 Speaker 08: Not seeing any. I'll call the
04:02:37 Speaker 08: question. All those in favour? Votes.
04:02:41 Speaker 08: Go ahead, Councillor Nielsen. I pulled.
04:02:43 Speaker 08: I pulled the Councillor Eccles. Last
04:02:45 Speaker 08: last minute. Last minute comment. Just
04:02:49 Speaker 08: for clarity, for myself, from. staff,
04:02:53 Speaker 08: passing this motion changes direction to
04:02:57 Speaker 08: staff that was previously given back
04:02:59 Speaker 08: in 2022 when we created Green
04:03:02 Speaker 08: and Gray, and the motion to
04:03:03 Speaker 08: bring forward a review of the
04:03:06 Speaker 08: Growing Green and Gray plan in
04:03:12 Speaker 08: 2026. This motion will supersede that
04:03:12 Speaker 08: motion and give direction that this
04:03:14 Speaker 08: is what we're looking for this
04:03:16 Speaker 08: time. And if we vote against
04:03:17 Speaker 08: this motion, we still get that
04:03:19 Speaker 08: report. And if we vote in
04:03:22 Speaker 08: favour, this one supersedes that one.
04:03:25 Speaker 08: That's all. I'm just wanting clarity
04:03:27 Speaker 08: for everybody around the horse. Clarity
04:03:28 Speaker 08: for everybody on the horseshoe, as
04:03:30 Speaker 08: unclear as that was. I'm looking
04:03:32 Speaker 08: for clarity. Right, Rainy, you want
04:03:34 Speaker 08: to speak to that, please. So,
04:03:36 Speaker 08: the 2022 motion indicates that staff
04:03:39 Speaker 08: would bring forward a report regarding
04:03:40 Speaker 08: the targets with respect to going
04:03:42 Speaker 08: green and gray. So that could
04:03:44 Speaker 60: be, you know, similar to what's
04:03:46 Speaker 60: identified as part of this motion,
04:03:48 Speaker 60: but this helps clarify. I think,
04:03:50 Speaker 60: in terms of what information will
04:03:51 Speaker 60: be brought back by staff as
04:03:53 Speaker 60: part of that comprehensive report, to
04:03:55 Speaker 60: give the information that this council
04:03:57 Speaker 60: needs in order to determine what's
04:03:59 Speaker 60: what's what's kept, what's changed, what's
04:04:01 Speaker 60: potentially removed or shifted. I think
04:04:03 Speaker 60: this motion would give that further
04:04:05 Speaker 60: clarification. Thank you, Randy. Last call
04:04:08 Speaker 60: for questions. Councillor Carlton. Maybe this
04:04:09 Speaker 60: doesn't mean anything, but who
04:04:11 Speaker 60: is the report coming back to?
04:04:14 Speaker 60: Budget and Finance, or County Council?
04:04:16 Speaker 60: I think at this stage, staff
04:04:18 Speaker 60: would recommend that this report come
04:04:20 Speaker 60: back to Council. So committee of
04:04:22 Speaker 60: the whole initially, but then to
04:04:23 Speaker 60: Council. Yeah, may as well. Okay,
04:04:25 Speaker 60: I'm going to call the question.
04:04:27 Speaker 60: All those in favour? Opposed to
04:04:29 Speaker 60: any? That carries. Thank you very
04:04:32 Speaker 60: much, ladies. and gentlemen. Now we
04:04:34 Speaker 60: move on to the fifth recommendation
04:04:37 Speaker 60: from the Budget and Audit Committee,
04:04:39 Speaker 60: or Budget and Finance rather. You're
04:04:41 Speaker 60: jumping ahead. You were hoping. You
04:04:43 Speaker 60: were hopeful. You were hopeful. I
04:04:44 Speaker 60: need a mover for that recommendation.
04:04:48 Speaker 60: There, Councillor Nielsen, second to by
04:04:49 Speaker 60: Councillor Body. Councillor Nielsen, you have
04:04:51 Speaker 60: a question. Thank you very much,
04:04:53 Speaker 60: Deputy Warden. Just commenting. number five.
04:04:55 Speaker 60: It says the report regarding the
04:04:57 Speaker 60: ten-year capital forecast come forward, but
04:04:58 Speaker 60: it does say removing the experimental
04:05:01 Speaker 60: acres, which was a loss. So
04:05:03 Speaker 60: I guess that will automatically change
04:05:05 Speaker 60: and update. Just for clarity, I
04:05:07 Speaker 60: heard disregard. So I'm going to
04:05:09 Speaker 60: do that. No, sorry, I I
04:05:11 Speaker 60: didn't understand your. Go ahead, try
04:05:15 Speaker 60: it again. My apologies, Deputy Warren.
04:05:17 Speaker 60: I was talking a little fast.
04:05:19 Speaker 60: Just I'm making sure I'm on
04:05:22 Speaker 60: the same page with the clerk.
04:05:23 Speaker 60: Was that their one section of
04:05:26 Speaker 60: item number five says we're moving
04:05:28 Speaker 60: funding for the experimental Lakers project?
04:05:29 Speaker 60: That motion lost earlier. I was
04:05:31 Speaker 60: just more commenting that this will
04:05:33 Speaker 60: automatically be updated through the clerk's.
04:05:35 Speaker 60: So it's moving it here does
04:05:38 Speaker 60: not reestablish that idea. I'm going
04:05:40 Speaker 60: to say correct. All those in
04:05:41 Speaker 60: favour? That carries. Number six, the
04:05:42 Speaker 60: final one, the report regarding the
04:05:44 Speaker 60: capital project status update report as
04:05:47 Speaker 60: of. 31 of August of
04:05:48 Speaker 60: this year be received for
04:05:51 Speaker 60: information. Someone care to move that,
04:05:52 Speaker 60: please, Councillor Carlton, Councillor Pringle. Questions?
04:05:54 Speaker 60: All those in favour? That is
04:05:56 Speaker 60: carried. Apparently, it's been brought to
04:05:58 Speaker 60: my attention that we have not
04:05:59 Speaker 60: actually received the minutes yet. And
04:06:00 Speaker 60: here I thought we'd spent the
04:06:01 Speaker 60: last I don't know two days
04:06:05 Speaker 60: debating the minutes. but apparently we
04:06:06 Speaker 60: have not done that yet. So
04:06:10 Speaker 60: I need someone to move that,
04:06:12 Speaker 60: please, Councillor Deckard and Councillor Nielsen.
04:06:16 Speaker 60: Any discussion? All those in favour?
04:06:17 Speaker 60: That is carried. Perfect. Okay, Randy,
04:06:19 Speaker 60: you're up. We're going to talk
04:06:20 Speaker 60: about now Roma delegations. So Randy,
04:06:22 Speaker 60: the floor is yours, sir. Oh,
04:06:25 Speaker 60: oh no, no, we're doing the.
04:06:26 Speaker 60: Yeah, we have the two. Yep,
04:06:28 Speaker 79: yep. No, we have six A
04:06:30 Speaker 79: and six B, I think. Say
04:06:31 Speaker 79: in six B, I think. Am
04:06:34 Speaker 79: I wrong? Oh, okay. Oh man,
04:06:35 Speaker 60: I was really hoping to move
04:06:37 Speaker 60: this along. Try again. Okay, seven
04:06:39 Speaker 60: B is the item that we're
04:06:40 Speaker 60: going to entertain now on the
04:06:43 Speaker 60: budget, and it is regarding easement
04:06:46 Speaker 60: and memorandum of understanding. So,
04:06:48 Speaker 60: Randy, the floor is yours, sir.
04:06:50 Speaker 60: I don't know if we need
04:06:52 Speaker 60: a. mover and second for at
04:06:55 Speaker 60: least the first recommendation. Yes, we
04:06:57 Speaker 60: do. We need a mover and
04:06:59 Speaker 60: secondor, Councillor Hutchison and Debrine. Thank
04:07:01 Speaker 60: you very much. Thank you, Deputy
04:07:03 Speaker 60: Warden. Good afternoon, everybody.
04:07:05 Speaker 60: So I'll be as quick
04:07:08 Speaker 60: as I can with respect to
04:07:11 Speaker 60: this matter. The report I'm presenting
04:07:13 Speaker 60: today deals with two matters. First
04:07:15 Speaker 60: matter is updating Council on optioning
04:07:17 Speaker 60: back the lands adjacent to Gray
04:07:19 Speaker 60: Gables from Bright Shores, as directed
04:07:21 Speaker 60: by Council, and to recommend easements
04:07:23 Speaker 60: for Bright Shores as part of
04:07:26 Speaker 60: that land transfer. process. The second
04:07:27 Speaker 60: matter is to present a proposed
04:07:29 Speaker 60: MOU as per the previous direction
04:07:32 Speaker 60: from council, that outlines the terms
04:07:35 Speaker 60: of the potential sale of the
04:07:37 Speaker 60: portion of these lands to Grey
04:07:39 Speaker 60: Highlands to support the future development
04:07:41 Speaker 60: of an OPP station in Markdale.
04:07:44 Speaker 60: So, just to give some further
04:07:45 Speaker 60: background, in July 2020, Grey County
04:07:47 Speaker 60: transferred lands to Bright Shores as
04:07:48 Speaker 60: part of Grey County's contribution for
04:07:51 Speaker 60: the Markdale Hospital project. During that,
04:07:52 Speaker 60: the planning for that hospital project,
04:07:54 Speaker 60: it was determined that. stormwater upgrades
04:07:56 Speaker 60: were required on the approximate four-acre
04:07:58 Speaker 60: parcel adjacent to the south driveway
04:08:00 Speaker 60: entrance to the Grey Gables and
04:08:01 Speaker 60: Hospital properties. In order for the
04:08:03 Speaker 60: stormwater works to be eligible for
04:08:06 Speaker 60: provincial funding at that time, Brightshore
04:08:08 Speaker 60: is required to own the lands.
04:08:10 Speaker 60: The agreement allowed the county to
04:08:12 Speaker 60: repurchase the lands once the stormwater
04:08:15 Speaker 60: works were completed, and those stormwater
04:08:16 Speaker 60: upgrades are now finished. On May
04:08:18 Speaker 60: 22, 2025, the council passed a
04:08:19 Speaker 60: motion directing staff to opt. Directing
04:08:21 Speaker 60: staff to option those those lands
04:08:23 Speaker 60: back from Bright Shores, and to
04:08:25 Speaker 60: negotiate an agreement with Great Hinds
04:08:26 Speaker 60: to sell portions of these lands
04:08:29 Speaker 60: for a proposed OPP station. As
04:08:30 Speaker 60: part of the terms of optioning
04:08:31 Speaker 60: back the lands from Bright
04:08:35 Speaker 60: Shores, the county agreed to provide
04:08:36 Speaker 60: Bright Shores with an easement permitting
04:08:39 Speaker 60: access to the lands where the
04:08:42 Speaker 60: South Driveway Hospital sign was to
04:08:44 Speaker 60: be installed. The actual location of
04:08:46 Speaker 60: that sign moves slightly from its
04:08:49 Speaker 60: intended location, and as such, Bright
04:08:52 Speaker 60: Shores has requested that the easement.
04:08:53 Speaker 60: be amended to align with its
04:08:55 Speaker 14: present location, and that's shown in
04:08:59 Speaker 14: Figure One, outlined in blue. This
04:09:04 Speaker 14: easement will allow BrightSource to access
04:09:07 Speaker 14: the lands to erect, repair, maintain,
04:09:08 Speaker 14: change, or remove that's that hospital
04:09:10 Speaker 14: sign should they need to do
04:09:12 Speaker 14: so. BrightSource has also requested an
04:09:15 Speaker 14: additional easement to access and
04:09:17 Speaker 14: maintain the light poles that were
04:09:19 Speaker 14: installed as part of the Markdale
04:09:22 Speaker 14: Hospital project, and these are installed
04:09:24 Speaker 14: along the shared entrance, and that's
04:09:25 Speaker 14: outlined in red. on Figure One.
04:09:28 Speaker 14: Staff have no concerns with these
04:09:31 Speaker 80: requests, provided that they do not
04:09:32 Speaker 80: interfere with the future use of
04:09:34 Speaker 80: the lands by either the county
04:09:37 Speaker 80: or Gray Highlands. So it's recommended
04:09:40 Speaker 80: that easements be prepared for council's
04:09:44 Speaker 80: consideration, subject to further consultation with
04:09:47 Speaker 80: Bright Shores and Gray Highlands on
04:09:51 Speaker 80: the specific presences of the easement.
04:09:54 Speaker 80: So that's dealing with recommendation number
04:09:56 Speaker 80: one. I don't know if we
04:09:57 Speaker 80: want to just deal with that,
04:09:59 Speaker 46: and then I can go into
04:10:01 Speaker 46: the report on recommendation number two.
04:10:05 Speaker 46: Let's do motion one first. Are
04:10:06 Speaker 46: there any questions on the easement
04:10:09 Speaker 46: recommendation? Not seeing any. All those
04:10:11 Speaker 46: in favour? That is carried. Okay,
04:10:12 Speaker 46: Randy. Thank you, Deputy Warden. So,
04:10:15 Speaker 46: as noted earlier, part of the
04:10:17 Speaker 46: motion that was passed by County
04:10:18 Speaker 46: Committee the whole on May twenty
04:10:21 Speaker 46: second also directed staff to negotiate
04:10:23 Speaker 46: an agreement with Gray Highlands that
04:10:25 Speaker 46: would commit to selling a portion
04:10:27 Speaker 46: of the subject lands. This motion
04:10:30 Speaker 46: was based on a request received
04:10:33 Speaker 46: earlier this year from Gray Highlands
04:10:35 Speaker 46: requesting that the county consider transferring
04:10:37 Speaker 46: a part of the subject lands
04:10:39 Speaker 46: to the municipality. Gray Highlands is
04:10:42 Speaker 46: planning to construct a new police
04:10:45 Speaker 46: station in Markdale for the OPP,
04:10:47 Speaker 46: as the current Markdale location is
04:10:50 Speaker 46: slated for future residential development. Grayhounds
04:10:52 Speaker 46: Council also recently directed Grayhounds staff
04:10:55 Speaker 46: to begin negotiations for the development
04:10:57 Speaker 46: of a new OPP regional facility
04:11:00 Speaker 46: in Markdale. A media release from
04:11:02 Speaker 46: Gray Highlands issued last month
04:11:04 Speaker 46: notes that the new facility is
04:11:07 Speaker 46: proposed to serve as a repository
04:11:08 Speaker 46: for Serve as a reporting centre
04:11:10 Speaker 46: for policing services across Grampians County,
04:11:13 Speaker 46: supporting multiple municipalities and potentially expanding
04:11:14 Speaker 46: expanding service in the area. A
04:11:17 Speaker 46: draft MOU has been prepared, outlining
04:11:18 Speaker 46: the key terms as directed by
04:11:21 Speaker 46: Council, including that the county commits
04:11:26 Speaker 46: to selling only the land required
04:11:27 Speaker 46: to support the build, the build
04:11:29 Speaker 46: be designed as compact as possible,
04:11:31 Speaker 46: utilising the least amount of land
04:11:35 Speaker 46: as possible, that Greyhound covers all
04:11:38 Speaker 46: the costs with respect to the
04:11:44 Speaker 46: build design, stormwater. Bill design stormwater
04:11:47 Speaker 46: relocation legal survey that the existing
04:11:50 Speaker 46: stormwater and drainage works for Greggville
04:11:51 Speaker 46: site and shared entrances must be
04:11:53 Speaker 46: addressed in the design. If the
04:11:54 Speaker 46: OPP station does not proceed, the
04:11:56 Speaker 46: commitment is withdrawn. The sale price
04:11:58 Speaker 46: will be based on an appraisal,
04:12:00 Speaker 46: and that future agreement of purchase
04:12:05 Speaker 46: and sale will come back to
04:12:08 Speaker 46: council for approval. Staff have worked
04:12:10 Speaker 46: with Bright Shores and Greyhound staff
04:12:12 Speaker 46: in preparing the draft MOU, and
04:12:15 Speaker 46: it's recommended that a bylaw be
04:12:17 Speaker 46: brought forward for council's consideration. to
04:12:19 Speaker 46: authorise the warden clerk to execute
04:12:21 Speaker 46: the MOU, subject to any further
04:12:22 Speaker 46: minor revisions recommended by the parties.
04:12:24 Speaker 46: At this stage, there's no direct
04:12:25 Speaker 46: financial impacts to the county. Greyhounds
04:12:29 Speaker 46: will cover, like said, all the
04:12:31 Speaker 46: costs related to the transfer. The
04:12:32 Speaker 46: county has engaged an appraiser to
04:12:34 Speaker 46: determine the land value of the
04:12:37 Speaker 46: eventual sale, and the results of
04:12:39 Speaker 46: that appraisal will inform the agreement
04:12:42 Speaker 46: of purchase and sale, which would
04:12:43 Speaker 46: again come back to council at
04:12:45 Speaker 46: a future date. So that's dealing
04:12:50 Speaker 46: with the second recommendation and the.
04:12:51 Speaker 46: second recommendation in the in the
04:12:53 Speaker 46: report. Thank you, Randy. And I
04:12:58 Speaker 46: neglected to get a mover and
04:13:00 Speaker 46: seconder for that. Councillor Patterson
04:13:02 Speaker 46: and Councillor Hutchison. Any discussion or
04:13:05 Speaker 46: questions on that report? Not seeing
04:13:09 Speaker 46: any. I'll call the question. All
04:13:12 Speaker 46: those in favour? That is carried.
04:13:16 Speaker 46: Thank you, Randy. Now we have
04:13:18 Speaker 46: a report seven C from the
04:13:20 Speaker 46: clerk's office. It is regarding delegation
04:13:23 Speaker 46: of duties, bylaw and policy update.
04:13:26 Speaker 46: Is there a mover and seconder?
04:13:27 Speaker 46: Councillor Mackey. and Councillor Pringle. Madam
04:13:31 Speaker 46: Clerk, you have the
04:13:33 Speaker 46: floor. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Warden.
04:13:37 Speaker 46: This report is before you today
04:13:39 Speaker 46: as an update to the Delegation
04:13:42 Speaker 46: and Duties Bylaw. It is a
04:13:46 Speaker 46: policy that's required by the Municipal
04:13:48 Speaker 46: Act. As a municipality, Grey County
04:13:50 Speaker 46: exercises its decision-making abilities through council,
04:13:53 Speaker 46: and a Delegation of Duties Bylaw
04:13:55 Speaker 46: allows for certain authorities to be
04:13:57 Speaker 46: delegated to staff. or other bodies
04:14:00 Speaker 46: to approve on its behalf. It
04:14:02 Speaker 46: does help with streamlining and efficiency
04:14:05 Speaker 46: of municipal operations. It is a
04:14:07 Speaker 46: very important bylaw in that regard,
04:14:10 Speaker 46: and staff are able to approve
04:14:13 Speaker 46: administrative and operational items on council's
04:14:17 Speaker 46: behalf and carry out their their
04:14:19 Speaker 46: work. The current bylaw, as written,
04:14:20 Speaker 46: was updated in twenty twenty.
04:14:21 Speaker 46: It currently offers little flexibility for
04:14:24 Speaker 46: staff when they're carrying out operational
04:14:26 Speaker 46: matters, both for the staff that
04:14:29 Speaker 46: are doing the work and then
04:14:30 Speaker 46: the agreement staff in the clerks
04:14:32 Speaker 46: department who are supporting them, the
04:14:39 Speaker 46: bylaw also doesn't delegate signatories out
04:14:40 Speaker 46: past the warden and clerk for
04:14:43 Speaker 46: many of the items, so it
04:14:46 Speaker 46: it does often rest with the
04:14:48 Speaker 46: warden and clerk to sign as
04:14:50 Speaker 46: the signing officer of the organisation.
04:14:52 Speaker 30: This new bylaw does propose to
04:14:54 Speaker 30: shift that signatory to the staff
04:14:56 Speaker 30: who are actually approving the documentation.
04:15:00 Speaker 30: It will also allow staff to
04:15:03 Speaker 46: approve and sign documents that are
04:15:05 Speaker 46: non-financial or procured in accordance with
04:15:08 Speaker 46: the purchasing policy, where the subject
04:15:10 Speaker 46: matter is administrative or operational nature,
04:15:13 Speaker 46: and relate to the management of
04:15:15 Speaker 46: Gray County. It will also allow
04:15:17 Speaker 46: staff to sign amendments and terminations
04:15:21 Speaker 46: where that follow an agreement that
04:15:24 Speaker 46: has been signed, and other ancillary
04:15:26 Speaker 46: docs if there are no
04:15:32 Speaker 46: financial changes or implications to Gray
04:15:33 Speaker 19: County. There are a number of
04:15:36 Speaker 19: other delegations and changes listed in
04:15:37 Speaker 19: the report, but there are some
04:15:39 Speaker 19: that are worth just specifying during
04:15:41 Speaker 19: the presentation here. So there is
04:15:43 Speaker 19: a new section that includes special
04:15:46 Speaker 19: circumstances or emergencies when it's necessary
04:15:48 Speaker 19: to act within the normal mandate
04:15:51 Speaker 19: of a department, and giving the
04:15:53 Speaker 81: department heads the ability to act
04:15:55 Speaker 81: where needed. There's a reporting requirement
04:15:57 Speaker 81: that comes along with that. There's
04:15:59 Speaker 81: a delegation to the treasurer and
04:16:01 Speaker 81: clerk to appoint deputy treasurers and
04:16:03 Speaker 81: deputy clerks as needed. It specifies
04:16:06 Speaker 81: a section where certain staff are
04:16:08 Speaker 81: able to bring certain types of
04:16:10 Speaker 81: bylaw forward without a prior report
04:16:12 Speaker 81: to the whole. These reports include
04:16:13 Speaker 81: traffic matters, minor nature, heritage tax
04:16:16 Speaker 81: rebates, the Teague matters, tax increment
04:16:18 Speaker 81: grants. Thank you, and staff appointments
04:16:21 Speaker 81: as. well. There is a delegation
04:16:23 Speaker 81: of authority to the CAO to
04:16:24 Speaker 81: act during the restricted acts slash
04:16:26 Speaker 81: lame duck periods. In the year
04:16:28 Speaker 81: of a municipal election, there is
04:16:29 Speaker 81: a portion that exists in the
04:16:31 Speaker 81: current bylaw already, but this proposal
04:16:34 Speaker 81: would shift the rest of the
04:16:35 Speaker 81: eligible duties to the CAO to
04:16:37 Speaker 36: allow the CAO to act during
04:16:40 Speaker 36: restricted acts and lame duck. Historically,
04:16:43 Speaker 36: we've always brought a standalone bylaw
04:16:46 Speaker 36: forward, which delegates those duties during
04:16:48 Speaker 36: an election year, but having it
04:16:51 Speaker 36: incorporated into this bylaw would negate
04:16:54 Speaker 36: the need to do that. But
04:16:55 Speaker 36: it would just of note to
04:16:58 Speaker 36: council if there were staffing changes
04:17:00 Speaker 36: in the future, and or CEO
04:17:02 Speaker 36: was absent for a portion of
04:17:04 Speaker 36: that time, we would have to
04:17:06 Speaker 36: go back and and change that
04:17:11 Speaker 36: bylaw if if council wished just
04:17:13 Speaker 36: to do so. There is a
04:17:15 Speaker 36: delegation of authority to the museum
04:17:19 Speaker 36: manager and or the director of
04:17:21 Speaker 36: economic development. Tourism, and Culture to
04:17:22 Speaker 36: approve or deny the exceptions at
04:17:24 Speaker 36: the museum. Sorry, delegation of authority
04:17:27 Speaker 36: to the Director of Long-Term Care
04:17:32 Speaker 36: to approve and sign temporary bed
04:17:33 Speaker 36: licences, signing waivers for all department
04:17:38 Speaker 36: heads, agreements with federal and provincial
04:17:39 Speaker 36: governments, agencies, institutions, and community partners
04:17:41 Speaker 36: for county undertakings, programme delivery, and
04:17:45 Speaker 36: administration. That's a summary of the
04:17:47 Speaker 36: changes in the. report. What the
04:17:49 Speaker 36: bylaw doesn't do is allow staff
04:17:51 Speaker 36: to approve or sign documentation that
04:17:53 Speaker 36: for things that haven't been approved
04:17:53 Speaker 36: by council. So those those will
04:17:55 Speaker 36: still have to go through the
04:17:57 Speaker 36: budget process and be approved by
04:17:59 Speaker 36: county council. Or if they're considered
04:18:04 Speaker 36: administrative and operational, that would shift
04:18:06 Speaker 82: to staff approving and signing. It
04:18:08 Speaker 82: also doesn't remove any. decision making
04:18:11 Speaker 82: from council. That is retained by
04:18:14 Speaker 82: virtue of being council, and it
04:18:17 Speaker 82: can be revoked at any time,
04:18:19 Speaker 82: with the exception of one item,
04:18:23 Speaker 82: which is the head for the
04:18:24 Speaker 83: purposes on and FIPA. That was
04:18:26 Speaker 83: actually previously delegated many years ago,
04:18:27 Speaker 36: but it's incorporated into this bylaw
04:18:30 Speaker 36: as well for clarity. That's kind
04:18:32 Speaker 36: of a summary of the report.
04:18:34 Speaker 36: And happy to take any questions
04:18:36 Speaker 36: with there. Thank you, Tara. Are
04:18:37 Speaker 36: there any questions, Councillor Bourdon? Thank
04:18:39 Speaker 36: you, Deputy Warden. Through you, thanks,
04:18:40 Speaker 36: Tara. Just on page three, the
04:18:42 Speaker 36: top of page three, agreements with
04:18:43 Speaker 36: federal and provincial governments, agencies, institutions.
04:18:45 Speaker 36: Can you just extrapolate that further?
04:18:47 Speaker 84: That's is that just the execution
04:18:48 Speaker 84: of them? Because those some of
04:18:50 Speaker 84: those agreements should come to this
04:18:51 Speaker 84: council. I'm just just for clarification.
04:18:52 Speaker 84: So the way it's proposed in
04:18:54 Speaker 84: the bylaw is it would be
04:18:56 Speaker 84: the blanket agreements with federal and
04:18:57 Speaker 84: provincial governments. There's no threshold in
04:18:58 Speaker 84: there, but as long as the
04:19:00 Speaker 84: programme or activity has been approved
04:19:02 Speaker 84: by council, if it hasn't been
04:19:06 Speaker 84: approved by council, then those agreements
04:19:07 Speaker 84: would still have to come back
04:19:09 Speaker 84: for actual endorsement. Okay. Any further
04:19:12 Speaker 84: questions? Call the question. All those
04:19:14 Speaker 84: in favour? That is carried. Thank
04:19:15 Speaker 84: you, Chair. Now we're moving on
04:19:20 Speaker 84: to 7E because we've already dealt
04:19:23 Speaker 84: with D. This is a report
04:19:25 Speaker 85: from Stephanie Stewart regarding continuation of
04:19:27 Speaker 85: the GTR and the Ghost Transit
04:19:33 Speaker 85: Systems in 2026. Stephanie, welcome. Floor
04:19:35 Speaker 85: is yours. Wait, I need a
04:19:37 Speaker 85: mover and seconder. Sorry, Councillor Keaveny
04:19:40 Speaker 85: and Councillor Hutchison. Thank you, Your
04:19:41 Speaker 85: Worship. Good afternoon, County Council. So,
04:19:43 Speaker 85: my report this afternoon is just
04:19:44 Speaker 02: to seek your approval to extend
04:19:51 Speaker 02: operations of the GTR and to
04:19:53 Speaker 02: participate in the Ghost Transit service
04:19:56 Speaker 02: until August thirty first, twenty twenty
04:19:58 Speaker 02: six, ensuring continued transit access during
04:20:00 Speaker 02: the transition to a potential new
04:20:02 Speaker 02: regional system. The province has approved
04:20:04 Speaker 02: OTIF funding to support both these
04:20:05 Speaker 02: services, and staff have confirmed from
04:20:08 Speaker 02: contributing partners that they will also
04:20:10 Speaker 02: support this idea. There are no
04:20:11 Speaker 60: further financial requests outside of this
04:20:13 Speaker 60: previously. sorry, outside the previously approved
04:20:16 Speaker 60: three county levy of one hundred
04:20:18 Speaker 60: and forty-five thousand for twenty twenty-six
04:20:20 Speaker 60: budget considerations, as per my last
04:20:22 Speaker 60: report. At this time, I'd like
04:20:24 Speaker 60: to take any questions. If you
04:20:26 Speaker 60: have any, okay. Thank you, Stephanie.
04:20:28 Speaker 60: Any questions, Councillor Gregg? Please. Thank
04:20:30 Speaker 60: you. And just a couple questions,
04:20:31 Speaker 60: just to confirm some of the
04:20:33 Speaker 60: numbers in the charts on
04:20:37 Speaker 60: page five. The ghost has
04:20:39 Speaker 60: been a great service, benefiting people
04:20:40 Speaker 60: up and down Highway Six. I've
04:20:43 Speaker 60: rode it many times and. good
04:20:46 Speaker 60: to see the revenues shown on
04:20:48 Speaker 60: on the chart as well. But
04:20:50 Speaker 60: the connectivity's been terrific, and and
04:20:53 Speaker 60: valued in the community for sure.
04:20:54 Speaker 60: One question, Stephanie: the chart
04:20:56 Speaker 60: shows fare revenue for the GTR,
04:20:59 Speaker 60: January to March of eighty seven
04:21:00 Speaker 60: hundred dollars. It also showed really
04:21:03 Speaker 60: positive, increasing ridership numbers above that.
04:21:05 Speaker 60: It just had me thinking that
04:21:07 Speaker 60: eighty seven hundred strikes me as
04:21:10 Speaker 60: not maybe being correct. Is that
04:21:12 Speaker 60: is that the actual fair revenue
04:21:14 Speaker 60: that is generated over three months,
04:21:18 Speaker 60: or is that just an error
04:21:20 Speaker 60: in the report? And second question
04:21:22 Speaker 60: is just to confirm: this year
04:21:24 Speaker 60: was one hundred one thousand of
04:21:26 Speaker 60: levy funding to the transportation department,
04:21:28 Speaker 60: and this increase projected to increase
04:21:30 Speaker 60: by forty three thousand. I think
04:21:32 Speaker 60: about one hundred forty four for
04:21:34 Speaker 60: twenty six. The ninety six thousand
04:21:36 Speaker 60: seven hundred is inclusive. within that
04:21:38 Speaker 60: 144 and not on top. I
04:21:40 Speaker 60: just wanted to confirm that.
04:21:42 Speaker 60: Thanks, your worship. So, in regards
04:21:45 Speaker 60: to your first question about fair
04:21:46 Speaker 60: revenue for the GTR, that's an
04:21:48 Speaker 60: estimate for 2026, and that was
04:21:50 Speaker 60: confirmed through our finance team looking
04:21:54 Speaker 60: at our previous fair revenues
04:21:57 Speaker 60: and calculating and projecting forward. I
04:21:58 Speaker 60: can double check just to make
04:22:01 Speaker 60: sure that I have that correct
04:22:02 Speaker 60: and report back to council in
04:22:05 Speaker 60: case I have had a typo.
04:22:08 Speaker 60: and in regards to the ninety-six
04:22:12 Speaker 60: thousand seven hundred, that is inclusive.
04:22:14 Speaker 60: Thank you for that. And when
04:22:15 Speaker 60: we are looking at next
04:22:18 Speaker 60: year's budget, what's the fair revenue,
04:22:21 Speaker 60: the cost per ride, and what
04:22:23 Speaker 60: the staff consider when you're looking
04:22:26 Speaker 60: at increases to user fees and
04:22:28 Speaker 60: charges and so forth? Through your
04:22:29 Speaker 60: worship, thank you for the question,
04:22:32 Speaker 60: Councillor Greg. So. that's still all
04:22:33 Speaker 60: to be determined in the study
04:22:38 Speaker 60: that we're currently undergoing. We will
04:22:40 Speaker 60: bring all of those options
04:22:42 Speaker 60: and possibilities back to council to
04:22:45 Speaker 60: make those educated decisions, so that
04:22:48 Speaker 60: we're all on the same page
04:22:50 Speaker 60: and happy and satisfied with the
04:22:53 Speaker 60: project moving forward and what the
04:22:55 Speaker 60: future may look like. So there
04:22:59 Speaker 60: will be opportunities for councillors
04:23:02 Speaker 60: to participate in councillor-specific kind of
04:23:06 Speaker 60: workshops to be in your feedback
04:23:07 Speaker 60: as to what you'd like to
04:23:10 Speaker 60: see transit look like in our
04:23:13 Speaker 60: region, and then also as a
04:23:16 Speaker 60: member of the general public, you
04:23:19 Speaker 60: can come out to any
04:23:21 Speaker 60: of our community stakeholders. meetings and
04:23:24 Speaker 60: share your feedback there as well.
04:23:25 Speaker 60: But I will assure you that
04:23:28 Speaker 60: we will bring the back fare
04:23:29 Speaker 60: policy to this council to
04:23:31 Speaker 60: give you the opportunity to
04:23:34 Speaker 60: let us know what you think.
04:23:36 Speaker 60: And could you just confirm
04:23:38 Speaker 60: what that current fare is on
04:23:41 Speaker 60: the GTR for that route? Through
04:23:44 Speaker 60: you, your worship, the fare cost
04:23:47 Speaker 60: for the GTR is five dollars
04:23:49 Speaker 60: to go between Dundalk and Orangeville.
04:23:50 Speaker 60: Okay. Any further questions? Not
04:23:53 Speaker 60: seeing any, I'll call the question.
04:23:56 Speaker 60: All those in favour? It is
04:23:58 Speaker 60: carried. Thank you, Stephanie. Next report
04:24:00 Speaker 60: is from the CAO. It is
04:24:03 Speaker 60: regarding Roma delegations. Didn't take that
04:24:05 Speaker 60: long to get back to that
04:24:06 Speaker 60: one. Randy, the floor is yours.
04:24:09 Speaker 60: Oh, I need a move.
04:24:11 Speaker 60: Well, I don't think I need
04:24:13 Speaker 60: a mover and seconder on that
04:24:16 Speaker 60: one. Do it. Thank you, Deputy
04:24:18 Speaker 60: Warden, and through you and to
04:24:20 Speaker 60: to County Council. So, staff have
04:24:22 Speaker 60: been working at trying to track
04:24:25 Speaker 60: as many of the potential delegation
04:24:27 Speaker 60: requests for Roma through various discussions
04:24:28 Speaker 60: that have occurred through County Council
04:24:29 Speaker 60: as well as at various subcommittees.
04:24:31 Speaker 60: So, based on that tracking of
04:24:33 Speaker 60: lists, and and you'll see it
04:24:35 Speaker 60: on the screen, which we just
04:24:37 Speaker 60: finalized as of as of yesterday.
04:24:39 Speaker 60: This this is the what we're
04:24:40 Speaker 60: recommending as as be our delegation
04:24:43 Speaker 60: request for Roma. of course, will
04:24:45 Speaker 60: take any direction from Council with
04:24:47 Speaker 60: respect to adding or removing any
04:24:48 Speaker 60: of these delegation requests as Council
04:24:51 Speaker 60: sees fit. But I'll just provide
04:24:54 Speaker 60: an overview of what we're recommending.
04:24:56 Speaker 60: First, would be to the Ministry
04:25:01 Speaker 60: of Municipal Affairs and Housing, discussing
04:25:02 Speaker 60: strategies to improve housing affordability, encouraging
04:25:03 Speaker 60: activation of approved developments, especially those
04:25:06 Speaker 60: that have sat dormant for
04:25:09 Speaker 60: some time, support resilient housing technologies
04:25:14 Speaker 60: to reduce fossil fuel reliance and
04:25:19 Speaker 60: long-term ownership costs. and advocate for
04:25:20 Speaker 02: increased base funding and retention of
04:25:23 Speaker 02: Georgian Colleges' own sound campus to
04:25:25 Speaker 02: be able to move forward with
04:25:31 Speaker 02: provincial priorities, including building more housing.
04:25:34 Speaker 02: That's something that last point we
04:25:34 Speaker 02: probably want to weave through each
04:25:36 Speaker 02: of the delegations in terms of
04:25:38 Speaker 02: the importance of of maintaining those
04:25:41 Speaker 02: rural college campuses in order to
04:25:42 Speaker 02: keep our skilled workforce to be
04:25:44 Speaker 02: able to move forward with these
04:25:47 Speaker 02: projects as well as aligning with
04:25:49 Speaker 02: the provincial priorities. With provincial priorities,
04:25:55 Speaker 02: second delegation request that staff would
04:25:58 Speaker 02: recommend is a request to the
04:26:04 Speaker 02: Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation,
04:26:06 Speaker 02: Trade, and Ministry of Finance,
04:26:09 Speaker 02: and this specifically would be around
04:26:14 Speaker 02: the topic of of the importance
04:26:16 Speaker 02: and critical role of rural college
04:26:19 Speaker 02: campuses in developing a skilled workforce
04:26:22 Speaker 02: in order to again advance some
04:26:25 Speaker 02: of those provincial priorities, such as
04:26:26 Speaker 02: building more housing and skilled workforce
04:26:30 Speaker 02: to support new and expanding industrial
04:26:33 Speaker 02: operations, energy projects, as well as
04:26:35 Speaker 02: even opening. up the Ring of
04:26:38 Speaker 02: Fire, and advocating for the increased
04:26:41 Speaker 02: base funding to sustain. In in
04:26:42 Speaker 02: our specific example, the Georgian College
04:26:44 Speaker 02: Oceansound Campus. Second staff delegation request
04:26:47 Speaker 02: recommendation is to the Ministry of
04:26:48 Speaker 02: Long Term Care. Through that delegation,
04:26:50 Speaker 86: we can provide updates on the
04:26:54 Speaker 86: new Rockwood Terrace and request flexibility
04:26:56 Speaker 86: on occupancy timelines beyond the current
04:27:00 Speaker 86: 14-day occupancy window that's required. Address
04:27:04 Speaker 86: delays in transitioning residents from. the
04:27:05 Speaker 86: behavioural support transition unit due to
04:27:08 Speaker 86: provincial bed allocation priorities, continue discussions
04:27:10 Speaker 86: and implications on the legislative changes
04:27:13 Speaker 86: for personal support workers and resident
04:27:14 Speaker 86: support personnel, and further address and
04:27:18 Speaker 86: discuss any updates with respect to
04:27:19 Speaker 86: the new bed allocations for Great
04:27:21 Speaker 86: Gables and future use of existing
04:27:23 Speaker 86: Rockwood Terrace when the new home
04:27:26 Speaker 86: is operational. The fourth delegation request
04:27:29 Speaker 86: is to the Ministry of Transportation,
04:27:30 Speaker 86: advocating for intersection control. system support,
04:27:32 Speaker 86: improved signage for emergency and pedestrian
04:27:34 Speaker 86: safety, seeking commitments to partner on
04:27:36 Speaker 86: the East-West Corridor options assessment to
04:27:40 Speaker 86: address Highway 26 congestion, and in
04:27:43 Speaker 86: conjunction with Simcoe County and the
04:27:44 Speaker 86: South Georgian Bay municipalities, and request
04:27:46 Speaker 86: improved coordination and communication during weather-related
04:27:47 Speaker 86: road closures. The next delegation request
04:27:49 Speaker 86: will be to the Ministry of
04:27:50 Speaker 86: Health, requesting increased offload. Increase offload
04:27:52 Speaker 86: nursing support, permanent funding for social
04:27:54 Speaker 86: navigators, and collabourating with Gravurs OHT
04:27:56 Speaker 86: and municipalities to improve recruitment and
04:27:58 Speaker 86: retention of physicians and healthcare professionals.
04:27:59 Speaker 22: Next delegation request to be to
04:28:02 Speaker 22: the Ministry of Environment, Conservation, and
04:28:05 Speaker 22: Parks, advocating for and this is
04:28:06 Speaker 22: something that's coming out of the
04:28:07 Speaker 22: waste management community practice discussions, advocating
04:28:09 Speaker 22: for extending recycling collection under the
04:28:11 Speaker 22: EPR model to small institutional, commercial,
04:28:13 Speaker 22: and industrial properties. and express concerns
04:28:14 Speaker 22: about landfill impacts from new regulations
04:28:15 Speaker 22: excluding those properties from municipal collection.
04:28:16 Speaker 22: To the Ministry of the Solicitor
04:28:18 Speaker 22: General, seeking clarity and funding for
04:28:20 Speaker 22: new armed security directives at provincial
04:28:21 Speaker 22: offences courts, and request a review
04:28:22 Speaker 22: of fence fines to align with
04:28:24 Speaker 22: enforcement costs and reduce reliance on
04:28:28 Speaker 22: property tax. And the last and
04:28:29 Speaker 22: final request that staff are recommending
04:28:31 Speaker 22: is to the Ministry of Natural
04:28:32 Speaker 22: Resources and Forestry. to discuss proposed
04:28:35 Speaker 22: changes to the Conservation Authorities, advocating
04:28:37 Speaker 22: for consistent watershed management and source
04:28:39 Speaker 22: water protection, emphasizing the value of
04:28:40 Speaker 22: sea lands for recreation and climate
04:28:41 Speaker 22: resilience, and reaffirming Grey County's commitment
04:28:43 Speaker 22: to participating in the upcoming review
04:28:44 Speaker 22: of the Niagara Government Plan. Just
04:28:45 Speaker 22: on that last one, staff are
04:28:47 Speaker 22: working on a report. We're planning
04:28:48 Speaker 22: to bring that forward to the
04:28:49 Speaker 22: December eleven th committee of the
04:28:50 Speaker 22: whole meeting with respect to the
04:28:51 Speaker 22: proposed changes to Conservation Authorities. So
04:28:53 Speaker 22: this is again. due to the
04:28:55 Speaker 22: deadline of the Roma request of
04:28:56 Speaker 22: November nineteenth, kind of being a
04:28:57 Speaker 22: bit proactive and submitting a placeholder
04:28:59 Speaker 22: request should council wish to do
04:29:02 Speaker 22: so. So those are the delegation
04:29:05 Speaker 22: requests that staff are recommending. Happy
04:29:07 Speaker 22: to take any further direction from
04:29:11 Speaker 22: council. Okay, thank you, Randy. Is
04:29:13 Speaker 22: there any requests or need to
04:29:16 Speaker 22: expand that list or shorten it?
04:29:19 Speaker 22: Okay, everybody seems happy with that,
04:29:21 Speaker 22: but I do need a mover
04:29:24 Speaker 22: and seconder to recommend. or to
04:29:27 Speaker 22: accept the recommendation. Councillor Nielsen,
04:29:30 Speaker 22: Councillor Mackey. Oh darn it, McKay,
04:29:32 Speaker 39: McKay, I was close. Sorry, Scott.
04:29:35 Speaker 39: I know, I know. Okay, so
04:29:39 Speaker 39: we have a mover and seconder.
04:29:43 Speaker 39: All those in favour? That is
04:29:46 Speaker 39: carried. Thank you very much, Randy.
04:29:48 Speaker 39: Okay, we have the two consent
04:29:49 Speaker 39: items. that I think we'll deal
04:29:51 Speaker 39: with now before the close session,
04:29:54 Speaker 39: we have six A and six
04:29:57 Speaker 39: B. I think was it Councillor
04:29:59 Speaker 39: McQueen that asked for six A,
04:30:09 Speaker 39: or was it Councillor Greg? Councillor
04:30:10 Speaker 39: Greg asked for six A. So
04:30:12 Speaker 02: you'll move that recommendation, or do
04:30:15 Speaker 02: you wish to change the direction?
04:30:17 Speaker 02: Is there a seconder for that?
04:30:19 Speaker 02: Oh, you didn't. Sorry, sorry, I.
04:30:22 Speaker 02: misunderstood. Someone care to move that
04:30:24 Speaker 02: recommendation, Councillor McQueen, seconded by Councillor
04:30:27 Speaker 02: Nielsen. Okay, that is regarding the
04:30:29 Speaker 02: County Council and Advisory Committee meeting
04:30:32 Speaker 02: calendar. Anyone wish to have questions
04:30:34 Speaker 02: discussion, Councillor Greg? Thank you, and
04:30:36 Speaker 02: through you, Warden, Deputy Warden. At
04:30:37 Speaker 02: the top of the second page,
04:30:39 Speaker 02: it states it is anticipated. that
04:30:43 Speaker 02: electronic participation will continue in order
04:30:44 Speaker 02: to support attendance for those with
04:30:45 Speaker 02: variable schedules. I see a real
04:30:47 Speaker 02: benefit in having members present in
04:30:49 Speaker 02: the chambers, and I can understand
04:30:51 Speaker 02: at times the requirement to join
04:30:53 Speaker 02: virtually. But if this is the
04:30:57 Speaker 02: moment the council should be having
04:30:59 Speaker 02: a discussion about what our practice
04:31:01 Speaker 02: is, I didn't want it to
04:31:02 Speaker 02: to pass by. I understand we
04:31:04 Speaker 02: went through our period of. of
04:31:06 Speaker 02: COVID, and it was certainly necessary,
04:31:07 Speaker 22: but I think at this time
04:31:09 Speaker 22: it is very beneficial to be
04:31:12 Speaker 22: able to look across the, the
04:31:13 Speaker 22: council floor at your peers, and
04:31:15 Speaker 22: see the hands that go in
04:31:17 Speaker 22: the air, the hands, the the
04:31:18 Speaker 02: interest, the engagement, and so forth.
04:31:21 Speaker 02: And I just wondered what appetite
04:31:23 Speaker 02: there is from council to have
04:31:28 Speaker 02: some sort of a parametre on
04:31:30 Speaker 02: in in person attendance. for a
04:31:33 Speaker 02: component of the year, a percentage
04:31:35 Speaker 02: of the meetings, a certain number
04:31:37 Speaker 02: of the meetings, or so
04:31:40 Speaker 02: forth. It's certainly something that I'd
04:31:43 Speaker 02: be amenable to. Okay, is there
04:31:46 Speaker 02: any discussion in that regard, Councillor
04:31:47 Speaker 02: McQueen? Thank you, Deputy Ward. I will say there is merit to having it leaving it in there to a certain degree because, one, if you come down with the flu or you don't want to, you know, feeling well, you can still participate. And I think few weeks, Councillor. And I think a few weeks ago or recently you you were you didn't come because you didn't want to spoil everybody else with your second part is weather. I know myself, I'm an hour away, and there's a lot of weather between here and there, and same with others. So you have that option as well if if it's inconvenient and risking your life and all that kind of stuff. So I mean, how do you put a number on that? I don't know. I think generally it's been working well in most parts. I know myself, I will try to be here, but I think there is that flexibility. that if you didn't have it, you you would miss a meeting on those two those two examples where you can still participate, still be part of it. So I certainly feel very strongly that it stays in there, and I think, you know, I don't think any of my colleagues would like to catch something that if I'm not feeling well. And I think that's one of the big ones that came out of COVID and that realization. But I think in most part we do come here, and I would agree. I see the colour of your eyes. I can't quite tell right now, but. you know, I think it's important if we can that we come. I don't know if it's being abused or not, but I just, I think it's important to have that flexibility. Okay, thank you. Any other discussion, Councillor Debrine? Through you, we're approving the calendar and, in general, the support attendance virtually. Would this, would that not require notice of motion to revisit the procedure bylaw, or develop an electronic participation policy? so that we could look at best practices across. I don't know that I think anticipated that the electronic participation would continue as it currently stands, unless otherwise a member brings notice motion for it. I would say fair enough, but I have no further amendment to this point. So we're just talking about the calendar, as you pointed out, but if. there was a notice of motion to give further direction to reconsider, we could do that. But at this point, there is not such an amendment proposed. Any further discussion? Yeah, there is an update coming for the procedural bylaw, not too distant future, I understand. So there will be another opportunity if so inclined. to do that. So on the calendar itself, I'll call the vote. All those in favour? That is carried. Seven B or six B rather is regarding the Gray County Egg Services Centre annual report. I think Councillor McQueen wished to move to receive that. Is that correct? Yes. Is there a seconder for that? Councillor Ackles will second that. Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Deputy Warden. And I only raised it because of the discussion we had about two hours ago. but I will follow up with the egg office if they would certainly do a presentation to this, especially with the experimental acres. Very good. Any other discussion on that one? Not seeing any. I'll call the question. All those in favour? That is carried. Okay, we do have a closed session. I believe that we're ready for that, Madam Clerk. We are okay. So the closed session request is that the Committee of the Whole does now go into closed session pursuant to Section. Two Hundred Thirty Nine, Part Two of the Municipal Act, Two Thousand One, is amended to discuss one litigation or potential litigation, specifically the Eden Oak subdivision, and B, or two, a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality, specifically a land acquisition. So I need a mover to go into closed session. Councillor McKay, Councillor Patterson will second that. All those in favour? That is carried. I'm not sure which staff we need to stay.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.