Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — November 13, 2025

Hook: Student Tragedy Acknowledged Closed Session

Grey County · County Council · November 13, 2025

Summary

County Council convened with Warden Stephanie Patterson calling order and acknowledging traditional territories on November 13, 2025. The session concluded by adopting closed minutes from October and passing new bylaws for land transactions within City of One Sound while sharing community updates.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
County Council
Date
November 13, 2025
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

The meeting was called to order by Stephanie Patterson as the Warden while Matrosov sent regrets due to an event in Oakville for the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, followed by a declaration of interest check and singing of O Canada before conducting roll call with all members present except Matrasov.

00:05:29 Speaker 01: bring the meeting to order. Warden

00:05:31 Speaker 01: Matrosov sends her regrets. She's attending

00:05:33 Speaker 01: an event down in Oakville, I

00:05:35 Speaker 02: believe, today for the Great Lakes

00:05:37 Speaker 02: St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, which. is

00:05:41 Speaker 02: kind of ironic, given certain things.

00:05:44 Speaker 02: Anyway, call to order. Declaration of

00:05:48 Speaker 02: interest. Is there any regarding today's

00:05:50 Speaker 02: agenda? Not seeing any. Oh, yeah,

00:05:54 Speaker 02: we can do that too if

00:05:58 Speaker 02: you want. And I told, I

00:05:59 Speaker 02: told Tara right off the top.

00:06:03 Speaker 03: I said, I hope the rust

00:06:04 Speaker 03: doesn't show too hard. But apparently,

00:06:05 Speaker 03: it's it's here. We go. Yeah,

00:06:08 Speaker 03: buckle up. Here we go. We're

00:06:10 Speaker 03: gonna have fun, but it won't

00:06:12 Speaker 03: be smooth. So let's stand for

00:06:14 Speaker 04: old Canada. Oh, Canada, our home

00:06:24 Speaker 04: and native land. True patriot love

00:06:30 Speaker 04: in all of us command. With

00:06:37 Speaker 04: glowing hearts, we see thee rise,

00:06:42 Speaker 05: the true North, strong and free.

00:06:46 Speaker 05: From far and wide, O Canada,

00:06:50 Speaker 05: we stand on guard for thee.

00:06:55 Speaker 05: God keep our land, glorious and

00:07:01 Speaker 06: free. Oh. Oh Canada, we stand

00:07:09 Speaker 06: on guard for thee. Thank you,

00:07:14 Speaker 06: Madam Clerk. Would you do the

00:07:21 Speaker 06: roll call, please, Councillor Mackie? Councillor

00:07:30 Speaker 06: McKay, Councillor Carleton, Councillor Pringle, Councillor

00:07:31 Speaker 06: McQueen, Councillor Nielsen, Councillor Patterson, Councillor

00:07:39 Speaker 06: Dickert, Councillor Kentner, Councillor

00:07:41 Speaker 06: Keaveny, Councillor Body, Councillor Gregg,

00:07:45 Speaker 07: Deputy Warden Milne, Councillor Dobrine,

00:07:49 Speaker 07: Warden Matrasov sends her regrets

00:07:53 Speaker 07: today. Alternate Councillor Hope, Councillor Bourdinon,

00:07:58 Speaker 07: Councillor. Eccles, Councillor Hutchinson, we have

00:08:01 Speaker 07: all members and attendees today,

00:08:05 Speaker 07: with the exception of Warden Matrosovs.

00:08:09 Speaker 07: Thank you, and we do welcome

4 Land Acknowledgement

Council members acknowledged the traditional territories of the Anishinaabe, Six Nations, and Haudenosaunee peoples before adopting minutes from October 23rd without discussion.

00:08:10 Speaker 07: everyone here this morning. So, before

00:08:14 Speaker 07: we begin, I want to acknowledge

00:08:15 Speaker 07: with respect, we are gathered on

00:08:19 Speaker 07: the traditional territory of the Anishinaabe

00:08:21 Speaker 07: Nation, the people of the Three

00:08:23 Speaker 07: Fires, known as Ojibwe, Odawa, and

00:08:25 Speaker 07: Potawatomi Nations. We give thanks to

00:08:27 Speaker 07: the Chippewas of the Saguenay and

00:08:29 Speaker 08: the Chippewas of Nawash. And the

00:08:32 Speaker 08: Chippewas and Nishnawbe collectively as the

00:08:33 Speaker 08: Sauging Ojibwe Nation, the traditional keepers

00:08:35 Speaker 08: of these lands and waters since

00:08:38 Speaker 08: time immemorial. To our south lies

00:08:39 Speaker 08: the traditional territories of the Six

00:08:42 Speaker 08: Nations of the Grand River and

00:08:44 Speaker 08: the Haudenosaunee. We are dedicated to

00:08:46 Speaker 08: honouring Indigenous history and culture, and

00:08:49 Speaker 08: committed to moving forward in the

00:08:51 Speaker 08: spirit of truth, reconciliation, and friendship

00:08:53 Speaker 08: with all First Nations, Métis, and

00:08:55 Speaker 08: Inuit people. Okay, now we're back

00:08:58 Speaker 08: to the question I wanted to

00:09:05 Speaker 08: ask earlier: Is there any declaration

00:09:06 Speaker 08: of interest related to any item

00:09:08 Speaker 08: on today's agenda? Not seeing one.

00:09:10 Speaker 08: Any, if one should arise, you

00:09:13 Speaker 08: can declare it at any time.

00:09:15 Speaker 08: Adoption of the minutes: We have

00:09:16 Speaker 08: the minutes there from the October

00:09:19 Speaker 08: 23rd, both council and committee of

00:09:21 Speaker 08: the whole, and we have the

00:09:23 Speaker 08: closed committee of the whole meeting

00:09:24 Speaker 08: minutes from October 23rd. So we'll

00:09:26 Speaker 08: take the first one. from the

00:09:29 Speaker 08: twenty third, Councillor Ackles and Councillor

00:09:32 Speaker 08: McKay. Any discussion? All in favour?

6.b Closed Committee of the Whole meeting minutes dated October 23, 2025

Council approved the closed committee minutes from October 23, 2025.

00:09:38 Speaker 08: That is carried. Similarly, the closed

00:09:41 Speaker 08: meeting minutes of the October third

00:09:46 Speaker 08: council meeting. Someone care to move

00:09:49 Speaker 08: that? Councillor Keaveny, Councillor Hutchison. Any

00:09:50 Speaker 08: discussion? All in favour? That is

7 Closed Meeting Matters

Council members moved to adopt bylaws regarding the purchase and sale of lands in City of One Sound, which was carried without discussion. The meeting acknowledged a tragic loss involving students at John Deffenbaker Senior School before sharing community news about upcoming events like the Dundalk Santa Claus Parade on December 6th and Christmas on the Bay from December fourth to seventh. Councillors also highlighted local celebrations for Remembrance Day in Meaford, noting that downtown businesses are owned by former slayers during Dragon's Den tonight at Mefford Hall.

00:09:53 Speaker 08: carried. We have no closed meeting.

00:09:56 Speaker 08: matters, no reports. We have two

00:09:59 Speaker 08: bylaws. Someone care to move there

00:10:02 Speaker 08: regarding purchase and sale of lands

00:10:05 Speaker 08: in City of One Sound and

00:10:07 Speaker 08: the confirming bylaw, Councillor Gregg and

00:10:09 Speaker 08: Councillor Debrine. Any discussion? All those

00:10:12 Speaker 08: in favour? That is carried. News

00:10:16 Speaker 08: today. Before we get into other

00:10:21 Speaker 08: news, I would like to acknowledge

00:10:24 Speaker 08: the tragic. passing of three students

00:10:26 Speaker 08: and the critical injury injury of

00:10:29 Speaker 08: one additional student from John Deffenbaker

00:10:32 Speaker 08: Senior School in Hanover earlier this

00:10:34 Speaker 08: week. On behalf of Warden Matrasovs

00:10:37 Speaker 08: and Greene County, I want to

00:10:40 Speaker 08: extend our sincere condolences condolences to

00:10:42 Speaker 08: those families, friends, classmates, teachers, and

00:10:45 Speaker 08: all of those who are touched

00:10:49 Speaker 08: by this profound loss. Very tragic.

00:10:51 Speaker 08: Any other news? Celebrations here this

00:10:56 Speaker 08: morning, Councillor Debrine, please. Good morning,

00:11:00 Speaker 08: Deputy Warden, and good morning, County

00:11:07 Speaker 08: Council guests. I just—I know it

00:11:09 Speaker 08: seems distant time frame away, but

00:11:13 Speaker 08: our Dundalk Santa Claus Parade will

00:11:16 Speaker 08: be held the first Saturday in

00:11:19 Speaker 08: December, which will be before we

00:11:21 Speaker 09: meet again. So I just wanted

00:11:23 Speaker 09: to. make mention that the Dundalk

00:11:25 Speaker 09: Santa Claus Parade will be held

00:11:27 Speaker 09: at 6 p.m. on December 6th.

00:11:28 Speaker 09: Thank you. Anyone else? Okay. Oh,

00:11:33 Speaker 09: Councillor Nielsen, go ahead, please. Thank

00:11:37 Speaker 09: you very much, Deputy Warden. Even

00:11:42 Speaker 09: though you were trying to skip

00:11:43 Speaker 09: Oh Canada, I just wanted to

00:11:44 Speaker 09: comment on the wonderful Remembrance Day

00:11:46 Speaker 10: celebrations across Gray County. I know

00:11:48 Speaker 10: many of us attended, probably as

00:11:51 Speaker 10: many as we could, in multiple.

00:11:52 Speaker 10: Probably as many as we could

00:11:54 Speaker 10: and multiple ourselves, and it just—I

00:11:58 Speaker 10: had an interesting conversation with my

00:12:00 Speaker 10: children about it, and some of

00:12:02 Speaker 10: their classmates that, unfortunately, don't seem

00:12:05 Speaker 10: to understand the importance or or

00:12:08 Speaker 10: fully understand why it's such a

00:12:11 Speaker 10: a special day for Canada. So,

00:12:13 Speaker 10: it was just a great opportunity

00:12:14 Speaker 10: to kind of remind my own

00:12:16 Speaker 10: children and and have a wonderful

00:12:18 Speaker 10: time in the community, talking to

00:12:20 Speaker 10: veterans, talking to community members who

00:12:22 Speaker 10: have lost. their own family members

00:12:25 Speaker 10: and various aspects. So, just commenting

00:12:28 Speaker 10: on that. Thank you, Dean. Anyone

00:12:35 Speaker 10: else, Councillor Keaveny? Please. Good morning,

00:12:37 Speaker 10: Mister Deputy Warden and County Council.

00:12:38 Speaker 11: And I just wanted to share

00:12:40 Speaker 12: that Mayfield will be hosting our

00:12:43 Speaker 12: Christmas on the Bay, December the

00:12:45 Speaker 12: fourth to the seventh, in our

00:12:47 Speaker 12: Market Square with seventeen cabins full

00:12:49 Speaker 12: of vendors, so you can do

00:12:50 Speaker 12: your Christmas shopping and there. Christmas

00:12:52 Speaker 12: shopping, and there'll be fun and

00:12:54 Speaker 12: activities and entertainment and food and

00:12:56 Speaker 12: drink for everyone. So Meaford is

00:12:57 Speaker 12: a place to be. December fourth

00:13:00 Speaker 12: to the seventh. Thank you. Thank

00:13:05 Speaker 12: you, Shirley. Anyone else? Councillor Cantner,

00:13:07 Speaker 12: please. Yes, I'll just add that

00:13:08 Speaker 12: tonight is the night to be

00:13:11 Speaker 12: in Meaford as well. It's Dragon's

00:13:12 Speaker 12: Den, and this has been going

00:13:13 Speaker 12: on for years now. And if

00:13:16 Speaker 12: you want to see a really,

00:13:18 Speaker 12: really entertaining and informative programme, be

00:13:20 Speaker 13: at Meaford Hall tonight, seventh. Be

00:13:23 Speaker 13: at Mefford Hall tonight, seven thirty.

00:13:26 Speaker 13: And again, we have a group

00:13:27 Speaker 13: of of dragons and a group

00:13:29 Speaker 13: of slayers, and it's going to

00:13:34 Speaker 13: be very, very exciting. A lot,

00:13:35 Speaker 13: a lot of money being risked

00:13:37 Speaker 13: on budding entrepreneurs. And we, the

00:13:40 Speaker 13: amazing thing is, I think about

00:13:42 Speaker 13: a third of downtown Mefford is

00:13:44 Speaker 13: made up of former slayers. So

00:13:47 Speaker 13: it's a great, great show. And

00:13:50 Speaker 13: I encourage people if they're interested

00:13:52 Speaker 13: in in economic development to take

00:13:56 Speaker 13: this. in. Thank you. Thank you,

00:13:57 Speaker 14: Ross. Sounds exciting. Anyone else, Councillor

00:13:59 Speaker 14: Body? If I may, I just

00:14:01 Speaker 15: want to follow up on Councillor

00:14:07 Speaker 15: Nielsen's comments. I learned at the

00:14:09 Speaker 15: Legion from a upper regional person

00:14:10 Speaker 15: that veterans aren't easily allowed into

00:14:12 Speaker 15: schools to share the stories anymore.

00:14:13 Speaker 15: When we grew up, we learned

00:14:15 Speaker 15: from our parents the horrors of

00:14:18 Speaker 15: war and why we don't want

00:14:19 Speaker 15: to go to war and and

00:14:22 Speaker 15: and. all of that. Now, a

00:14:24 Speaker 15: veteran has to do a record

00:14:26 Speaker 15: check. Apparently, they have to have

00:14:29 Speaker 15: it listed 14 days in advance,

00:14:32 Speaker 15: so parents can protest if they

00:14:34 Speaker 15: don't want their children learning learning

00:14:37 Speaker 15: about the horrors of war. And

00:14:39 Speaker 15: I fear with those types of

00:14:40 Speaker 15: rules that the next generation isn't

00:14:42 Speaker 15: going to understand those horrors the

00:14:47 Speaker 15: same way as most of us

00:14:51 Speaker 15: in this room did, listening to

00:14:53 Speaker 15: our parents growing up. Removing poppies

00:14:57 Speaker 15: from the workplace—that's I find really

00:14:58 Speaker 15: disturbing in this country. And if

00:14:59 Speaker 15: you have any influence, any input

00:15:01 Speaker 15: into boards of education, I would

00:15:04 Speaker 15: hope that you would share that

00:15:06 Speaker 15: this isn't this isn't appropriate. We

00:15:09 Speaker 15: need to allow our veterans into

00:15:14 Speaker 15: schools to spread that story down

00:15:16 Speaker 15: to the next generation. Thanks. Thank

00:15:17 Speaker 14: you, Ian. Anyone else? Okay. Well,

00:15:20 Speaker 14: thank you for those. You know,

11 Adjournment

Council approved adjournment to proceed with committee of the whole.

00:15:23 Speaker 14: motion to adjourn from our council

00:15:25 Speaker 14: portion of the meeting. Councillor Patterson,

00:15:32 Speaker 14: Councillor McQueen, all those in favour?

00:15:34 Speaker 14: That is carried. We'll just move

00:15:35 Speaker 14: over to our committee of the

00:15:36 Speaker 14: whole. Thank you, Rob. We'll bring

00:15:40 Speaker 16: our committee of the whole meeting

00:15:41 Speaker 16: to order this morning. Is there

00:15:43 Speaker 16: any declaration of interest on this

00:15:45 Speaker 16: agenda? Seeing none. Of course, you

00:15:46 Speaker 16: can. declare it at any time

00:15:48 Speaker 16: it one arises. We have two

00:15:50 Speaker 16: delegations here this morning. The first

00:15:51 Speaker 16: is David Willis. He's with us

00:15:53 Speaker 16: here this morning. There he is.

00:15:56 Speaker 16: Come on up to the podium,

00:15:58 Speaker 16: sir. He's going to be speaking

00:16:05 Speaker 08: to us regarding Keystone funding and

00:16:07 Speaker 08: services. So, good morning, sir, and

00:16:10 Speaker 08: welcome. The floor is yours. Are

00:16:11 Speaker 17: we good? Sorry to have my

00:16:12 Speaker 17: back to some folks. Not intentional.

00:16:14 Speaker 17: My understanding is I've been invited

00:16:16 Speaker 17: to come and speak a little

00:16:20 Speaker 17: bit about Keystone and the programme

00:16:23 Speaker 17: that we have, and how the

00:16:24 Speaker 18: funding from this body supports our

00:16:27 Speaker 18: operations across both, mostly focused on

00:16:28 Speaker 18: Gray County, but Bruce County as

00:16:30 Speaker 18: well. And so, without further, I

00:16:32 Speaker 18: will jump into just giving you

00:16:34 Speaker 18: a sense of what Keystone Child,

00:16:38 Speaker 18: Youth, and Family Services is. We

00:16:40 Speaker 18: are the lead agency for Gray

00:16:42 Speaker 18: and Bruce Counties. That is a

00:16:45 Speaker 18: legislated function by. the Ministry of

00:16:47 Speaker 18: Health that came into effect probably

00:16:48 Speaker 18: mid 2013 2014, and what that

00:16:52 Speaker 18: means is that we're the system

00:16:55 Speaker 18: planners for child and

00:16:58 Speaker 18: youth mental health both countings. We're

00:17:01 Speaker 18: also the the organisation that supports

00:17:03 Speaker 18: evaluation, that supports funding opportunities, and

00:17:06 Speaker 18: supports grassroots organisations in building up

00:17:10 Speaker 18: their capacity to support children and

00:17:12 Speaker 18: youth and mental health services across

00:17:14 Speaker 18: the region. We lead. local needs

00:17:17 Speaker 18: assessments and engage with youth and

00:17:18 Speaker 18: families and service providers in shaping

00:17:20 Speaker 18: the system priorities in three to

00:17:23 Speaker 18: four-year blocks. Which means we are

00:17:25 Speaker 18: accountable to the ministry and the

00:17:29 Speaker 18: provincial government to deliver on those

00:17:32 Speaker 18: plans. We are currently in the

00:17:33 Speaker 18: process of developing the next four-year

00:17:35 Speaker 18: priorities for the ministry. We also

00:17:37 Speaker 18: serve as the key point of

00:17:40 Speaker 18: contact with the ministry of children,

00:17:42 Speaker 18: community, and social services. and for

00:17:43 Speaker 18: those who are aware of our

00:17:45 Speaker 18: ministries, we lived in MCCSS when

00:17:47 Speaker 18: it was called MCYS, and then

00:17:50 Speaker 18: it was yanked out and put

00:17:51 Speaker 18: into Ministry of Health. Some services

00:17:53 Speaker 18: still remain in MCCCS. Some services

00:17:56 Speaker 18: are in Ministry of Health, and

00:18:01 Speaker 18: so we bridge both of those

00:18:02 Speaker 18: ministries to support children and youth

00:18:04 Speaker 18: in our region. So, if we

00:18:07 Speaker 18: and I apologize for how small

00:18:08 Speaker 18: that writing is. Hopefully, everyone can

00:18:10 Speaker 18: can. see it without their glasses.

00:18:12 Speaker 18: I just wanted to give a

00:18:14 Speaker 18: snapshot of the the breadth and

00:18:17 Speaker 18: the scope of services that we

00:18:19 Speaker 18: provide that this funding actually supports

00:18:21 Speaker 18: in many ways. So, from our

00:18:23 Speaker 18: counseling and treatment services, we have

00:18:25 Speaker 18: crisis support services. A great example

00:18:28 Speaker 18: of how this funding supports us

00:18:30 Speaker 18: is we have currently engaged with

00:18:32 Speaker 18: a trauma specialist who is on

00:18:34 Speaker 18: site in Hanover, supporting those kids

00:18:37 Speaker 18: and families. We have team based

00:18:38 Speaker 18: interventions, which is a wrap around.

00:18:40 Speaker 18: Interventions, which is a wraparound service,

00:18:44 Speaker 18: we engage with psychiatry, psychology, social

00:18:46 Speaker 18: work to to wrap around clients

00:18:47 Speaker 18: and families to support them in

00:18:50 Speaker 18: their mental health journey. We have

00:18:53 Speaker 18: specific partnerships like the Hospital for

00:18:55 Speaker 18: Sick Children, where we are a

00:18:58 Speaker 18: part of what's called telepsychiatry or

00:19:02 Speaker 18: Telelink Mental Health, where we are

00:19:05 Speaker 18: one of thirty agencies across the

00:19:07 Speaker 18: province who have specialized access to

00:19:10 Speaker 18: over fifty child and youth psychiatrists

00:19:12 Speaker 18: who specialize in. zero to eighteen.

00:19:14 Speaker 18: We have supported classrooms through our

00:19:17 Speaker 18: partnerships with Blue Water. I'm not

00:19:19 Speaker 18: sure if folks realize, but right

00:19:22 Speaker 18: beside this building, we have a

00:19:25 Speaker 18: 13-bed live-in treatment facility that was

00:19:28 Speaker 18: a partnership with Bright Shores. Within

00:19:30 Speaker 18: that building, there are two Blue

00:19:32 Speaker 18: Water School Board classrooms where we

00:19:34 Speaker 18: have 16 desks where 16 students

00:19:35 Speaker 18: who are struggling within the the

00:19:37 Speaker 18: regular. education system come and spend

00:19:40 Speaker 18: up to six months or a

00:19:42 Speaker 18: year with us to get them

00:19:44 Speaker 18: back on track and moved back

00:19:45 Speaker 18: into the the regular education system.

00:19:47 Speaker 18: We also have intensive in home

00:19:49 Speaker 18: treatment. So as part of our

00:19:50 Speaker 18: continuum of services, if we have

00:19:52 Speaker 18: a client who is with us

00:19:54 Speaker 18: in our live in treatment, and

00:19:55 Speaker 18: I'll speak a little bit about

00:19:57 Speaker 18: this further in the deck, we

00:19:58 Speaker 18: recognize that kids who come into

00:20:01 Speaker 18: live in treatment when they are

00:20:02 Speaker 18: released from live in treatment or

00:20:04 Speaker 18: they graduate from live in treatment,

00:20:05 Speaker 18: they often Live-in treatment; they often

00:20:06 Speaker 18: go back to an environment and

00:20:08 Speaker 18: circumstances that bring them right back

00:20:10 Speaker 18: to the reason why they came

00:20:12 Speaker 18: into care in the first place.

00:20:14 Speaker 18: And so, part of our mandate

00:20:16 Speaker 18: and our new programmeming has been

00:20:17 Speaker 18: that we embed child and youth

00:20:19 Speaker 18: workers in the home with the

00:20:21 Speaker 18: family up to a year after

00:20:22 Speaker 18: their discharge from our live-in treatment,

00:20:23 Speaker 18: so that that transition both into

00:20:27 Speaker 18: the community and into school is

00:20:28 Speaker 18: seamless, and that if they need

00:20:32 Speaker 18: a tune-up, they can come back

00:20:34 Speaker 18: in and we can support them

00:20:38 Speaker 18: to sort of get them back

00:20:39 Speaker 18: on track. When we think about

00:20:42 Speaker 18: prenatal and six years community support,

00:20:44 Speaker 18: Healthy Beginnings, which is a programme

00:20:45 Speaker 18: that is funded through this this

00:20:47 Speaker 18: council, in partnership with the Ministry

00:20:49 Speaker 18: of Education, they support new moms

00:20:50 Speaker 18: and dads and caregivers who are

00:20:52 Speaker 18: struggling with with the youth that

00:20:53 Speaker 18: they have, and we support them

00:20:55 Speaker 18: in healthy eating, healthy management. We

00:20:57 Speaker 18: give them a break sometimes so

00:20:59 Speaker 18: that they can catch their breath.

00:21:01 Speaker 18: Cradle Link is the same thing.

00:21:03 Speaker 18: We have volunteers that actually sit

00:21:06 Speaker 18: in the hospital and. hold babies,

00:21:09 Speaker 18: so that they have that skin-to-skin

00:21:13 Speaker 18: contact. Writer Futures Early On centres

00:21:16 Speaker 18: in building resiliency. I think those

00:21:18 Speaker 18: are quite familiar, probably to this

00:21:20 Speaker 18: group. We also specialize in fetal

00:21:22 Speaker 18: alcohol spectrum disorder, which, if folks

00:21:25 Speaker 18: recognize, is a lifelong disability. It's

00:21:27 Speaker 18: not a mental health challenge; it's

00:21:28 Speaker 18: an actual disability, and so we

00:21:31 Speaker 18: are supporting youth up to the

00:21:33 Speaker 18: age of 21 to function. with

00:21:35 Speaker 18: what we would consider an external

00:21:40 Speaker 18: brain beside them, supporting them and

00:21:42 Speaker 18: making better decisions, so that they,

00:21:45 Speaker 18: so that they are moving in

00:21:45 Speaker 18: the right path with the right

00:21:48 Speaker 18: supports, coordinated access mechanisms for children

00:21:50 Speaker 18: and graybeards. This this this supports

00:21:51 Speaker 18: youth up to seventeen years of

00:21:53 Speaker 18: age with complex needs, and this

00:21:55 Speaker 18: is a part of a larger

00:21:56 Speaker 18: programme that Keystone has taken on

00:21:58 Speaker 18: as the leader in, on behalf

00:22:00 Speaker 18: of the Ministry of Community and.

00:22:02 Speaker 18: Social Services, and that is for

00:22:03 Speaker 18: those kids and families who have

00:22:04 Speaker 18: failed out of our system, that

00:22:07 Speaker 18: they have knocked on every door,

00:22:10 Speaker 18: they have they have been enroled

00:22:12 Speaker 18: in every service possible, and we

00:22:13 Speaker 18: are simply not supporting them in

00:22:15 Speaker 18: a way that is possible. So

00:22:17 Speaker 18: we're the flow-through organisation where we

00:22:21 Speaker 18: support the family, and we we

00:22:23 Speaker 18: liaise with the Ministry to ensure

00:22:26 Speaker 18: that they have funding in order

00:22:27 Speaker 18: to support and purchase the services

00:22:30 Speaker 18: that they require for that specialized

00:22:32 Speaker 18: youth. We also provide respite services

00:22:35 Speaker 18: for autism spectrum disorder families. We

00:22:36 Speaker 18: are in a, I would say,

00:22:39 Speaker 18: a crisis mode in this county

00:22:41 Speaker 18: around autism. We have no permanent

00:22:42 Speaker 18: services to support kids and families

00:22:43 Speaker 18: with autism. So, with the very

00:22:46 Speaker 18: little money we get, we provide

00:22:47 Speaker 18: an opportunity for parents to step

00:22:49 Speaker 18: back, take a breather, maybe hire

00:22:54 Speaker 18: someone to come in for a

00:22:56 Speaker 18: few hours to support their child

00:22:58 Speaker 18: while they are regrouping and able

00:23:00 Speaker 18: to come back into the family

00:23:02 Speaker 18: situation and. to and to support

00:23:04 Speaker 18: the client. So, what we are

00:23:06 Speaker 18: really excited about at the moment

00:23:08 Speaker 18: is our new live-in treatment programme

00:23:11 Speaker 18: and our step-up, step-down programme, and

00:23:12 Speaker 18: that is literally right beside this

00:23:13 Speaker 18: building. It is the old withdrawal

00:23:16 Speaker 18: management site that the hospital had.

00:23:17 Speaker 18: Through partnership with them, that that

00:23:20 Speaker 18: ownership was transferred to us. The

00:23:21 Speaker 18: Ministry of Health was kind enough

00:23:23 Speaker 18: to invest about two and a

00:23:24 Speaker 18: half million dollars to move it

00:23:27 Speaker 18: away from looking like a withdrawal.

00:23:29 Speaker 18: management centre, and make it look

00:23:31 Speaker 18: more like something that kids and

00:23:34 Speaker 18: youth would feel comfortable in. There

00:23:36 Speaker 18: are currently 13 beds in that

00:23:37 Speaker 18: in that building. Six of those

00:23:40 Speaker 18: are dedicated for step up, step

00:23:42 Speaker 18: down, and that is a programme

00:23:44 Speaker 18: in partnership with the hospital systems

00:23:47 Speaker 18: across both of our counties. So

00:23:49 Speaker 18: what happens is there are 11

00:23:51 Speaker 18: feeder hospitals that that try to

00:23:53 Speaker 18: access the two pediatric beds in

00:23:55 Speaker 18: the Owen Sound Hospital as what's

00:23:56 Speaker 18: called a schedule one facility. Owensound

00:23:59 Speaker 18: Hospital isn't even funded to be

00:24:01 Speaker 18: a Schedule One for you, but

00:24:04 Speaker 18: they are managing to to supply

00:24:06 Speaker 18: two beds for us when kids

00:24:09 Speaker 18: who are in such crisis that

00:24:11 Speaker 18: they need to be admitted against

00:24:14 Speaker 18: their will. So oftentimes we see

00:24:15 Speaker 18: kids who land in the emerge,

00:24:16 Speaker 18: who are quite serious, maybe in

00:24:18 Speaker 18: a in a situational crisis. They're

00:24:20 Speaker 18: not admissible, which means that they're

00:24:22 Speaker 18: not really they shouldn't be in

00:24:23 Speaker 18: a bed in the hospital. but

00:24:24 Speaker 18: they're not safe enough to go

00:24:25 Speaker 18: home. So our step up, step

00:24:27 Speaker 18: down programme is that intermediary area

00:24:29 Speaker 18: for those kids. So we get

00:24:32 Speaker 18: a call from the hospital, and

00:24:33 Speaker 18: they say to us, and this

00:24:35 Speaker 18: could be at any day, any

00:24:37 Speaker 18: time of day or night. We've

00:24:38 Speaker 18: got a seventeen-year-old youth who has

00:24:40 Speaker 18: been self-harming, who has, you know,

00:24:41 Speaker 18: run into the into the law

00:24:42 Speaker 18: several times. We can't release him

00:24:43 Speaker 18: without someone to support him. Family

00:24:45 Speaker 18: doesn't want him. So we will

00:24:47 Speaker 18: show up at the emerge at

00:24:50 Speaker 18: two in the morning, and we

00:24:52 Speaker 18: will do an intake for that

00:24:54 Speaker 18: child into our step up. step

00:24:56 Speaker 18: down programme, where they are given

00:24:58 Speaker 18: what's called a thirty day assessment

00:25:00 Speaker 18: and stabilization opportunity, where we bring

00:25:01 Speaker 18: in psychiatry, we bring in psychology,

00:25:02 Speaker 18: we bring in social work, and

00:25:05 Speaker 18: we work with that client and

00:25:07 Speaker 18: family to best understand the needs

00:25:08 Speaker 18: in that moment for that youth,

00:25:11 Speaker 18: and that may be one of

00:25:14 Speaker 18: a continuum of services. It may

00:25:16 Speaker 18: be community counseling and support in

00:25:19 Speaker 18: the home. It may be admitting

00:25:21 Speaker 18: into our unit so that they

00:25:23 Speaker 18: can stay now up to a

00:25:25 Speaker 18: year. if that's what's required, and

00:25:27 Speaker 18: we can do intensive in-home or

00:25:30 Speaker 18: intensive in-school support as well. We

00:25:32 Speaker 18: also have the ability to step

00:25:35 Speaker 18: back up when that client is

00:25:37 Speaker 18: in crisis again. So the partnership

00:25:40 Speaker 18: allows that bilateral flow between the

00:25:44 Speaker 18: hospitals and us, and that is

00:25:46 Speaker 18: that has been a very busy

00:25:47 Speaker 18: programme, is all I can say.

00:25:48 Speaker 18: The next programme on this on

00:25:51 Speaker 18: this deck, which is launching in

00:25:53 Speaker 18: January. I think, is something that

00:25:56 Speaker 18: has been very much needed in

00:25:57 Speaker 18: this in this county for a

00:25:59 Speaker 18: long time, and that is an

00:26:00 Speaker 18: urgent access programme. And so, as

00:26:01 Speaker 18: I was speaking earlier about the

00:26:03 Speaker 18: eleven feeder hospitals, what happens often

00:26:05 Speaker 18: is that a child or a

00:26:06 Speaker 18: youth lands in one of those

00:26:08 Speaker 18: hospitals, and they can be sitting

00:26:11 Speaker 18: there and they emerge up to

00:26:13 Speaker 18: a week waiting for a bed

00:26:14 Speaker 18: in Owensend. And if there are

00:26:17 Speaker 18: no beds in Owensend, they are

00:26:19 Speaker 18: blocked into that hospital system and

00:26:21 Speaker 18: remain there. System and remain that.

00:26:23 Speaker 18: So we have signed agreements with

00:26:24 Speaker 18: the three hospital systems. We have.

00:26:26 Speaker 18: We are now in the process

00:26:28 Speaker 18: of hiring eight crisis workers, who

00:26:30 Speaker 18: will be deployed wherever those clients

00:26:32 Speaker 18: and families need that support in

00:26:34 Speaker 18: the emergency room, in the family

00:26:36 Speaker 18: home, in the school. It doesn't

00:26:38 Speaker 18: matter where at this point. We

00:26:40 Speaker 18: will support that family and and

00:26:42 Speaker 18: bringing down the temperature, so that

00:26:46 Speaker 18: we can then start working with

00:26:48 Speaker 18: the client and family to support

00:26:49 Speaker 18: what's next, and that could be

00:26:52 Speaker 18: anything from landing. next door to

00:26:55 Speaker 18: community counseling, and a broad range

00:26:58 Speaker 18: of other services. So that actually

00:27:00 Speaker 18: launches in January. We have a

00:27:02 Speaker 18: we have a what was our

00:27:04 Speaker 18: old living treatment in downtown Owen

00:27:07 Speaker 18: Sound that has been completely renovated,

00:27:09 Speaker 18: and will become a hub for

00:27:12 Speaker 18: crisis services. So when families want

00:27:13 Speaker 18: to come in and do counseling,

00:27:16 Speaker 18: they will have a dedicated space

00:27:17 Speaker 18: for them and the clinicians and

00:27:22 Speaker 18: the and. the youth, it will

00:27:24 Speaker 18: also be a walk-in crisis. So

00:27:26 Speaker 18: if kids are experiencing something in

00:27:27 Speaker 18: the community and they need immediate

00:27:29 Speaker 18: support, we will be there with

00:27:31 Speaker 18: doors open, waiting to support those

00:27:34 Speaker 18: youth. The other this next slide

00:27:36 Speaker 18: is really just an indication of

00:27:36 Speaker 18: where our focus is, and as

00:27:39 Speaker 18: you can see up there, seventy-one

00:27:41 Speaker 18: percent of our clients come from

00:27:43 Speaker 18: Gray County, and that's about seventeen

00:27:45 Speaker 18: hundred and seventy-five clients per year.

00:27:46 Speaker 18: Now, this isn't, and what I

00:27:48 Speaker 18: want to stress is when we

00:27:50 Speaker 18: see 2,500 clients, those are new

00:27:54 Speaker 18: clients every year. Those are not

00:27:55 Speaker 18: repeats; those are individuals showing up

00:27:57 Speaker 18: for the first time. And so,

00:28:00 Speaker 18: that's an indication of the need

00:28:04 Speaker 18: within our two counties, and specifically

00:28:05 Speaker 18: within Gray County, for mental health

00:28:09 Speaker 18: services. And it surprises me every

00:28:11 Speaker 18: time I look at our data

00:28:13 Speaker 18: to recognize that there is that

00:28:14 Speaker 18: level of need within within this

00:28:16 Speaker 18: region. The other piece that you

00:28:19 Speaker 18: know, and and this is maybe

00:28:21 Speaker 18: a little bit outside of what

00:28:24 Speaker 18: we're supposed to be having a

00:28:26 Speaker 18: conversation about, but this is about

00:28:28 Speaker 18: two of the programmemes that are

00:28:30 Speaker 18: funded through this this this council

00:28:32 Speaker 18: on behalf of the Ministry of

00:28:34 Speaker 18: Education, our Early On Centre and

00:28:37 Speaker 18: our Building Resilience Centre. And my

00:28:38 Speaker 18: understanding in being invited here was

00:28:40 Speaker 18: to, in some ways, justify the

00:28:42 Speaker 18: funding that we receive from this

00:28:44 Speaker 18: council to support. child and youth

00:28:46 Speaker 18: mental health in this region, and

00:28:49 Speaker 18: in the past we have been

00:28:50 Speaker 18: very lucky to have the council

00:28:52 Speaker 18: come to us at the end

00:28:54 Speaker 18: of your fiscal year to say

00:28:57 Speaker 18: we have some surplus, and we

00:28:59 Speaker 18: can support a deficit if you

00:29:02 Speaker 18: have a deficit. What I would

00:29:03 Speaker 18: say is we have never not

00:29:05 Speaker 18: had a deficit in these two

00:29:07 Speaker 18: programmemes, and so this is the

00:29:10 Speaker 18: first year that we are recognizing

00:29:15 Speaker 18: from council that there is no

00:29:18 Speaker 18: appetite or ability to have. Tight

00:29:21 Speaker 18: or ability to cover those deficits,

00:29:23 Speaker 18: and so what you're seeing in

00:29:25 Speaker 18: front of you is, in fact,

00:29:26 Speaker 18: what we are projecting as a

00:29:29 Speaker 18: seventy-three thousand dollar deficit in these

00:29:31 Speaker 18: two programmemes. We are committed to

00:29:32 Speaker 18: these programmemes in a big way,

00:29:37 Speaker 18: but we are also realistic on

00:29:43 Speaker 18: how we can support our staff

00:29:45 Speaker 18: and the programmeming to continue. So,

00:29:47 Speaker 18: if you look down at the

00:29:49 Speaker 18: bottom, we started. this journey

00:29:51 Speaker 18: for early on in 2010 with

00:29:55 Speaker 18: a with a budget of 230

00:29:57 Speaker 18: or 234,000. 15 years later, we're

00:29:59 Speaker 18: at 242, and that represents it

00:30:01 Speaker 18: represents cost of living increases. It

00:30:02 Speaker 18: represents unionized agreements and increases that

00:30:03 Speaker 18: come with that. It represents the

00:30:05 Speaker 18: cost of doing business, transportation, building

00:30:08 Speaker 18: supplies. Doesn't stretch far enough for

00:30:10 Speaker 18: us. So unfortunately. we are in

00:30:11 Speaker 18: a position where, if if we

00:30:14 Speaker 18: do not find some other alternate

00:30:15 Speaker 18: source of funding, that we are

00:30:18 Speaker 18: going to have to shift some

00:30:22 Speaker 18: of the funding that the council

00:30:23 Speaker 18: provides us to cover these deficits.

00:30:27 Speaker 18: I recognize that that is not

00:30:29 Speaker 18: the ultimate, or that that is

00:30:31 Speaker 18: not the intent of this, but

00:30:34 Speaker 18: our funding agreements with the Ministry

00:30:35 Speaker 18: of Health and NCCSS forbid us

00:30:36 Speaker 18: to to reallocate funds outside of

00:30:38 Speaker 18: ministry funded programmemes, and so it

00:30:41 Speaker 18: is a dilemma for us. We

00:30:42 Speaker 18: have. we've undertaken a broad range

00:30:46 Speaker 18: of conversations across the province with

00:30:48 Speaker 18: other early on centres to understand

00:30:50 Speaker 18: what they're doing and what they're

00:30:51 Speaker 18: doing well, and what we're not

00:30:54 Speaker 18: doing or what we're doing and

00:30:56 Speaker 18: not not in the same way

00:30:57 Speaker 18: as others are. And what we've

00:30:59 Speaker 18: come away with is a commitment

00:31:03 Speaker 18: to continue our early on and

00:31:04 Speaker 18: building resiliency programmemes because we recognize

00:31:06 Speaker 18: the value that they provide to

00:31:09 Speaker 18: the county and the kids. Early

00:31:10 Speaker 18: on, in particular. I I spent

00:31:13 Speaker 18: some time in Ottawa a couple

00:31:14 Speaker 18: weeks ago with an early on

00:31:16 Speaker 18: centre where they have speech and

00:31:18 Speaker 18: language, OTPT, psychiatry, in their early

00:31:20 Speaker 18: on centres, and it is a

00:31:23 Speaker 18: transitionary opportunity for those kids who

00:31:24 Speaker 18: identified as needing more support than

00:31:26 Speaker 18: just the early on centre, moving

00:31:28 Speaker 18: into the other services that are

00:31:30 Speaker 18: that are available for them, in

00:31:32 Speaker 18: a seamless way. And as lead

00:31:36 Speaker 18: agency in Grey and Bruce counties,

00:31:37 Speaker 18: our obligation is to ensure that

00:31:38 Speaker 18: every kid lands. where they need

00:31:40 Speaker 18: to land, and our early on

00:31:45 Speaker 18: centre should be a conduit for

00:31:47 Speaker 18: those who require more service to

00:31:49 Speaker 18: seamlessly move into those programmemes. And

00:31:53 Speaker 18: so that's our hope, that's our

00:31:54 Speaker 18: goal, and and we are going

00:31:59 Speaker 18: to work as as hard as

00:32:01 Speaker 19: we can to ensure that those

00:32:03 Speaker 19: services continue with the support of

00:32:04 Speaker 19: this council. And with that, I

00:32:07 Speaker 19: would yield back to council and

00:32:10 Speaker 19: be open to questions or comments

00:32:12 Speaker 10: from anyone. Okay, thank you, Mr.

00:32:14 Speaker 10: Willis. Are there any questions from

00:32:16 Speaker 10: Council? Councillor Nielsen, please. Thank you

00:32:17 Speaker 10: very much, Deputy Warden. Just a

00:32:19 Speaker 10: question for you. You've spoken at

00:32:21 Speaker 10: the beginning of your presentation pretty

00:32:25 Speaker 10: extensively about working with youth who

00:32:27 Speaker 10: are experiencing crisis situations and such.

00:32:37 Speaker 10: So, just for my own clarity,

00:32:42 Speaker 10: the Community Safety Wellbeing Plan that

00:32:44 Speaker 10: exists and the situation tables that

00:32:45 Speaker 10: exist from that—it's keystone that helps

00:32:49 Speaker 10: with those situations. Just remind. Those

00:32:53 Speaker 10: situations, because from my understanding, it's

00:32:56 Speaker 20: a a large part of the

00:32:58 Speaker 20: situation tables are youth situations in

00:33:01 Speaker 20: our community, not so much adult

00:33:04 Speaker 20: situations. Absolutely, yeah. Any other questions,

00:33:10 Speaker 20: Councillor Kentner? Please. I guess we

00:33:12 Speaker 20: could really question you all day,

00:33:14 Speaker 20: I think, on this topic, but.

00:33:16 Speaker 20: Is the situation getting worse? Like

00:33:19 Speaker 20: I worked with you, you know,

00:33:21 Speaker 21: 25 years ago, and it's always

00:33:24 Speaker 21: been there. But is it getting

00:33:25 Speaker 21: worse? And maybe some reasons why.

00:33:26 Speaker 21: Thank you. Oh, do we have

00:33:28 Speaker 21: all day? All right. Short answer

00:33:31 Speaker 21: is absolutely. And a great example

00:33:33 Speaker 21: that I can give is COVID.

00:33:36 Speaker 21: We are as a population. and

00:33:38 Speaker 21: particularly as youth, dysregulated coming out

00:33:41 Speaker 21: of COVID. So, when you isolate

00:33:44 Speaker 21: youth for three years, and they

00:33:49 Speaker 21: have a little bit of anxiety

00:33:50 Speaker 21: or a little bit of depression,

00:33:52 Speaker 21: three years later that is full-blown

00:33:53 Speaker 21: mental illness, and and we are

00:33:56 Speaker 21: seeing that in spades. Our numbers

00:33:57 Speaker 21: continue to go up. The acuity,

00:33:59 Speaker 21: the severity of those clients continues

00:34:00 Speaker 21: to increase, and so, as an

00:34:03 Speaker 21: odd but interesting piece of data.

00:34:04 Speaker 21: Eating disorders tripled during COVID, which

00:34:06 Speaker 21: means that kids were sitting in

00:34:09 Speaker 21: front of their computers, taking in

00:34:12 Speaker 21: all kinds of information around body

00:34:15 Speaker 21: image, around you know things that

00:34:17 Speaker 21: sort of support that emergence of

00:34:20 Speaker 21: eating disorders. And now we have

00:34:22 Speaker 21: this huge need for eating disorders

00:34:24 Speaker 21: programmeming across the province, so not

00:34:25 Speaker 21: just the province but the country.

00:34:27 Speaker 21: So we are we are seeing

00:34:28 Speaker 21: more addictions in our in our

00:34:30 Speaker 21: presentations. Autism is increasing at a

00:34:31 Speaker 21: rapid rate. and the comorbidities. So

00:34:33 Speaker 21: the, so the, you know, it

00:34:34 Speaker 21: isn't just anxiety. It's anxiety, depression,

00:34:40 Speaker 21: OCD, and other things showing up

00:34:43 Speaker 21: at the same time. And so

00:34:44 Speaker 21: we are, you know, what we

00:34:47 Speaker 21: would say is that 2,700 kids

00:34:48 Speaker 22: we could move through in a

00:34:50 Speaker 22: year. Some of those kids now

00:34:52 Speaker 22: stay with us for several years

00:34:54 Speaker 22: because it is that intense. So

00:34:56 Speaker 22: it is, it's a, it's a

00:34:58 Speaker 22: challenge. Any other questions? Oh, Counselor

00:34:59 Speaker 22: McQueen, go ahead. Councillor McQueen, go

00:35:01 Speaker 22: ahead. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Warden,

00:35:03 Speaker 22: and thank you for your presentation.

00:35:04 Speaker 22: Certainly learned a lot here this

00:35:13 Speaker 22: morning. Just in your brief time

00:35:15 Speaker 22: here, two things. I don't know

00:35:18 Speaker 22: if you're able to provide this

00:35:19 Speaker 18: information to our lower tier councils

00:35:22 Speaker 18: because I think information is important

00:35:24 Speaker 18: for to share what you're just

00:35:26 Speaker 18: talking about this morning. But from

00:35:28 Speaker 18: the private sector or from personal

00:35:30 Speaker 18: donations, is that something you receive

00:35:32 Speaker 18: as well, or can can receive?

00:35:35 Speaker 18: The short answer is yes. The

00:35:37 Speaker 18: longer answer is it is never

00:35:39 Speaker 18: enough. And and as a as

00:35:40 Speaker 18: an organisation that is funded through

00:35:42 Speaker 18: ministries and other mechanisms, I don't

00:35:44 Speaker 18: think it's good business sense to

00:35:51 Speaker 18: use donation dollars to fund operations.

00:35:52 Speaker 18: And so what we do with

00:35:54 Speaker 18: donation dollars is we do test

00:35:57 Speaker 18: pilots, we do proof of concepts.

00:35:59 Speaker 18: If there's a if there's a

00:36:02 Speaker 18: repair to a playground that is

00:36:05 Speaker 18: falling apart, we will. take those

00:36:09 Speaker 18: donation dollars and we will use

00:36:10 Speaker 18: that to rebuild the, rebuild the

00:36:12 Speaker 18: playground. That's what we do. Thank

00:36:14 Speaker 18: you again for that. A few

00:36:15 Speaker 22: years back, we had an individual

00:36:16 Speaker 22: that was in our museum in

00:36:19 Speaker 22: Blesserton, and we got the name

00:36:23 Speaker 22: Museum Rob. You know, we're going

00:36:25 Speaker 22: with, but he he sort of

00:36:28 Speaker 22: engaged with the youth, in a

00:36:29 Speaker 22: sense of pride and ownership. and

00:36:32 Speaker 22: he was quite successful, and he

00:36:33 Speaker 22: and he just got kids involved,

00:36:35 Speaker 22: and you know the Hanley Institute

00:36:37 Speaker 22: and other ones you know that

00:36:38 Speaker 22: are out there are doing great

00:36:39 Speaker 22: things. It's it's it's. I don't

00:36:41 Speaker 22: know if it's it's kids today

00:36:42 Speaker 22: don't have that pride and ownership

00:36:43 Speaker 22: or not. I don't know, but

00:36:45 Speaker 22: sometimes individuals can can make a

00:36:47 Speaker 22: big difference, and obviously your your

00:36:48 Speaker 22: your your groups doing that. But

00:36:52 Speaker 22: again, I just think it's awareness,

00:36:54 Speaker 22: and you know probably if there's

00:36:56 Speaker 22: good news stories, people like to

00:36:57 Speaker 22: hear those good news stories, and

00:36:59 Speaker 22: that could generate your funding as

00:37:00 Speaker 22: well. And that's what I'm saying

00:37:02 Speaker 22: is sometimes it's in the stories

00:37:07 Speaker 22: and the good news stories that

00:37:08 Speaker 22: you share. And you know, because

00:37:11 Speaker 18: you know, to see a deficit

00:37:13 Speaker 18: and see a programme that you're

00:37:16 Speaker 18: offering greatly reduced because of well,

00:37:17 Speaker 18: your funding from 2010 until now

00:37:19 Speaker 18: has hasn't changed a lot. And

00:37:21 Speaker 18: I guess the advocate, the advocating

00:37:23 Speaker 18: to the province as well is

00:37:25 Speaker 18: that happening as well, and and

00:37:28 Speaker 18: is there a role there as

00:37:32 Speaker 18: well? I would I would describe

00:37:33 Speaker 18: it as we chase the dollars.

00:37:34 Speaker 18: We are like I probably have

00:37:35 Speaker 18: ten different business cases that I

00:37:38 Speaker 18: continually circulate into the ministries for

00:37:39 Speaker 18: funding. And if there is any

00:37:45 Speaker 18: opportunity for one-time funding, we grab

00:37:46 Speaker 18: it. We've become very good at

00:37:48 Speaker 23: sort of chasing that dollar and

00:37:49 Speaker 02: and using it to support to

00:37:51 Speaker 02: support the organisation. Yeah. The challenge

00:37:54 Speaker 02: is, of course, we will never.

00:37:56 Speaker 02: I mean, if we were to

00:37:59 Speaker 02: get enough money that we needed

00:38:01 Speaker 02: to support all of the needs,

00:38:04 Speaker 02: it would be a massive

00:38:06 Speaker 02: budget, and so it is the

00:38:13 Speaker 02: reality that we live with. Yeah.

00:38:16 Speaker 02: Okay. Well, thank you very much,

00:38:18 Speaker 02: Mr. Wells. It was a good

00:38:22 Speaker 02: presentation, and we appreciate your time

00:38:25 Speaker 24: to come and talk to us

00:38:28 Speaker 24: today. Thank you. All right. Moving

00:38:30 Speaker 24: on, we have one more delegation.

00:38:32 Speaker 24: Greg Jones will be attending online.

00:38:35 Speaker 24: There he is from Skyline. He's

00:38:36 Speaker 24: going to be talking to us

00:38:37 Speaker 24: regarding development charges, deferral, and conditional

00:38:40 Speaker 24: exemption agreement today. So, Mister Jones,

00:38:44 Speaker 24: the floor is yours, sir. Well,

00:38:46 Speaker 24: thank you, Deputy Warden. Can you

00:38:48 Speaker 24: hear me? Okay. Yes, we can.

00:38:51 Speaker 24: Awesome. Apologies for not being able

00:38:54 Speaker 24: to attend in corporeal form today.

00:39:11 Speaker 24: My name is Greg. Jones. I'm

00:39:14 Speaker 24: the president of Skydev, part of

00:39:16 Speaker 24: the Skyline Group of companies, and

00:39:23 Speaker 24: I'd love to take the opportunity

00:39:26 Speaker 24: to tell you a little bit

00:39:30 Speaker 24: about Skyline and and about our

00:39:33 Speaker 24: development in Owen Sound and the

00:39:36 Speaker 24: development charges policy that you have,

00:39:38 Speaker 24: and how it's exciting to be

00:39:41 Speaker 24: able to invest in rental housing

00:39:42 Speaker 24: in the County of Grey. With

00:39:46 Speaker 24: that, I'll start a presentation. Can

00:39:50 Speaker 24: you see that? Okay, or should

00:39:53 Speaker 24: I? Oh, we can see it.

00:39:57 Speaker 24: Yeah. Okay. All right. So, a

00:40:00 Speaker 24: little bit about Skyline. We started

00:40:02 Speaker 24: in. the '90s, with student rentals,

00:40:03 Speaker 24: eventually we started buying apartment buildings.

00:40:06 Speaker 24: We have an apartment reit, an

00:40:07 Speaker 24: industrial reit, a retail reit, and

00:40:10 Speaker 24: a clean energy fund. Together, we

00:40:12 Speaker 24: have about ten billion of real

00:40:15 Speaker 24: estate assets in Canada. Now, the

00:40:17 Speaker 24: most relevant portfolio is we own

00:40:20 Speaker 24: and manage over twenty thousand rental

00:40:22 Speaker 24: apartments across Canada. about twenty percent

00:40:24 Speaker 24: of the rental housing, purpose-built rental

00:40:28 Speaker 24: housing in the county of Grey.

00:40:32 Speaker 24: So we are a landlord today,

00:40:37 Speaker 24: and we provide housing for people

00:40:40 Speaker 24: today in in the county. We

00:40:43 Speaker 24: have an industrial rate of about

00:40:46 Speaker 24: ten million square feet of high

00:40:52 Speaker 24: bay industrial warehousing. We have breads

00:40:54 Speaker 24: and meds with our retail rate.

00:40:56 Speaker 24: We're we're in small town Ontario

00:40:58 Speaker 24: across Canada. We don't own anything

00:41:01 Speaker 24: in major cities. We're all second.

00:41:04 Speaker 24: We're all secondary and tertiary markets,

00:41:08 Speaker 24: investing in grocery stores and pharmacies

00:41:10 Speaker 24: primarily. We are the biggest producer

00:41:12 Speaker 24: of bio. I'm sorry, but I

00:41:16 Speaker 24: can't help you with that right

00:41:20 Speaker 24: now. Right about that, we're the

00:41:23 Speaker 24: biggest producer of biogas in Canada,

00:41:25 Speaker 24: with our plant in Elmira and

00:41:29 Speaker 24: Lethbridge, Alberta. Co-founders and myself. as

00:41:32 Speaker 24: Skydev, we're currently building about one

00:41:33 Speaker 24: thousand five hundred rental apartments in

00:41:36 Speaker 24: Ontario at the moment. My partners

00:41:39 Speaker 24: are a couple of guys from

00:41:42 Speaker 24: Walkerton, Ontario, and Fergus, Ontario. What

00:41:46 Speaker 24: have we done recently? We've delivered

00:41:48 Speaker 24: over six hundred rental apartments in

00:41:50 Speaker 24: communities like Chatham, Tecumseh, Ravenhurst, Welland,

00:41:52 Speaker 24: Collingwood. We even do supportive housing

00:41:54 Speaker 24: as a pro bono initiative. for

00:41:57 Speaker 24: nonprofits, trying to make a difference,

00:42:00 Speaker 24: create meaningful value in in the

00:42:02 Speaker 24: communities we're investing in. What are

00:42:04 Speaker 24: we building right now? We're building

00:42:12 Speaker 24: in the town of Simcoe, near

00:42:21 Speaker 24: Port Dover, the city of Belleville,

00:42:21 Speaker 24: city of Owen Sound, which we'll

00:42:25 Speaker 24: we'll cover, and the city of

00:42:27 Speaker 24: Barry. We I'll just show you

00:42:29 Speaker 24: some imagery quick of our development

00:42:33 Speaker 24: in Collingwood. what it looks like

00:42:35 Speaker 24: today, where we are leasing rental

00:42:38 Speaker 24: apartments now. We always have great

00:42:39 Speaker 24: indoor outdoor amenity spaces. Just giving

00:42:41 Speaker 24: you a flavour of what we're

00:42:44 Speaker 24: working on. This is Simcoe, Ontario.

00:42:47 Speaker 24: I'll show you a quick clip.

00:42:48 Speaker 24: We're building 199 rental apartments in

00:42:51 Speaker 24: the county of Norfolk. I don't

00:42:52 Speaker 24: know if you can hear the

00:42:54 Speaker 24: music, but no, we're not, we're

00:42:55 Speaker 24: not, we're not hearing the music.

00:43:18 Speaker 24: We can see the video. Belleville,

00:43:19 Speaker 24: we have two buildings here: 166

00:43:20 Speaker 25: rentals with the central amenity building.

00:43:26 Speaker 26: We have a development in Barry,

00:43:28 Speaker 26: right on the 400. You'll see

00:43:30 Speaker 26: some towers coming up. We have

00:43:32 Speaker 26: 565 apartments under construction at the

00:43:34 Speaker 26: moment. Here's a quick. drone video

00:43:37 Speaker 26: of what it looks like today.

00:43:42 Speaker 26: Give you an idea of what

00:43:45 Speaker 26: we're doing and what we're building

00:43:48 Speaker 26: and what we're investing in. All

00:43:51 Speaker 26: these projects are 100% rental apartments.

00:43:52 Speaker 26: So, gives you a bit of

00:43:54 Speaker 26: an update there of what we're

00:43:56 Speaker 26: working on, what we're investing in,

00:43:58 Speaker 26: discussing the development charges, policies, and

00:44:06 Speaker 26: exemptions. The policy in place from

00:44:08 Speaker 26: the County of Gray is what

00:44:11 Speaker 26: makes rental housing possible in the

00:44:15 Speaker 26: area. We're investing big time in

00:44:17 Speaker 26: Owen Sound, and I'll just show

00:44:20 Speaker 26: you some pictures. The we have

00:44:22 Speaker 26: three buildings. under construction of eight,

00:44:26 Speaker 26: two hundred and sixty-seven new rental

00:44:30 Speaker 26: apartments, and we're, I mean, great

00:44:34 Speaker 26: views of the bay and the

00:44:37 Speaker 26: water. We broke ground a few

00:44:39 Speaker 26: months back, and you'll see some

00:44:41 Speaker 26: the buildings coming up over over

00:44:46 Speaker 26: the winter. The here's another photo.

00:44:48 Speaker 26: We're because of the policy of

00:44:51 Speaker 26: the county of Gray exempting development.

00:44:53 Speaker 26: charges for rental housing projects. We're

00:44:54 Speaker 26: also looking at making our Osmond

00:44:56 Speaker 26: Shores project in Meaford rental. Presented

00:44:59 Speaker 26: that to council a few weeks

00:45:00 Speaker 26: ago, as well as a destination

00:45:02 Speaker 26: boutique hotel. Just some quick renderings.

00:45:04 Speaker 26: So, I mean, we're investing in

00:45:08 Speaker 26: rental housing across the province. We

00:45:11 Speaker 26: are investing in the County of

00:45:12 Speaker 26: Grey big time because of. Great

00:45:13 Speaker 26: big time because of the policies

00:45:17 Speaker 26: in place, where you know you're

00:45:19 Speaker 26: you're able to build rental housing

00:45:22 Speaker 26: for regular people. Just we're targeting

00:45:25 Speaker 26: the average income in the area.

00:45:27 Speaker 26: You have a lot of retirees

00:45:29 Speaker 26: that sell their homes and make

00:45:32 Speaker 26: housing available to other people, and

00:45:35 Speaker 26: are able to move into a

00:45:36 Speaker 26: turnkey lifestyle with elevators, as well

00:45:39 Speaker 26: as some big projects in the

00:45:42 Speaker 26: area where you have basically workforce

00:45:44 Speaker 26: housing for people. to be able

00:45:46 Speaker 26: to live in and have great

00:45:49 Speaker 26: views of the water in both

00:45:52 Speaker 26: Oceansound and Meaford. So today we're

00:45:55 Speaker 26: talking about Oceansound and the request

00:45:57 Speaker 26: for exemption. I just wanted to

00:46:01 Speaker 26: share from a business perspective, being

00:46:03 Speaker 26: able to say, "Hey, we have

00:46:04 Speaker 26: an exemption on this on this

00:46:06 Speaker 26: property to be able to build

00:46:10 Speaker 26: more rental housing." What that allows

00:46:14 Speaker 26: me to do is get more

00:46:17 Speaker 26: investment. so it's not just people

00:46:20 Speaker 26: renting apartments. It's attracting investment in

00:46:23 Speaker 26: rental housing. It's not a very

00:46:24 Speaker 26: good yield. It's a, it's a

00:46:27 Speaker 26: long-term ownership situation where we own

00:46:31 Speaker 26: and manage buildings for decades. So

00:46:33 Speaker 26: we're, you know, we're implementing sustainable

00:46:35 Speaker 26: technologies because it saves money. We

00:46:38 Speaker 26: do solar, we do all all

00:46:40 Speaker 26: the all the LEDs and all

00:46:43 Speaker 26: the the things you can do

00:46:45 Speaker 26: to save on energy and make

00:46:48 Speaker 26: it. Save on energy and make

00:46:49 Speaker 26: energy. Kind of like our our

00:46:51 Speaker 26: Skyline Energy Fund does, literally makes

00:46:52 Speaker 26: money out of garbage and sunshine.

00:46:57 Speaker 26: So we're always after those initiatives.

00:46:59 Speaker 26: We build rental housing across the

00:47:01 Speaker 26: country and own and keep it

00:47:03 Speaker 26: for a long period of time.

00:47:08 Speaker 26: What the ask today is is

00:47:10 Speaker 26: to allow for an exemption on

00:47:13 Speaker 26: the entire development to mirror. what

00:47:16 Speaker 26: the city of Owen Sound has

00:47:20 Speaker 26: done, where we're able to attract

00:47:23 Speaker 26: more investment in rental housing. There's

00:47:26 Speaker 26: nonprofits interested in the property. I

00:47:28 Speaker 26: have more investors that are ready

00:47:29 Speaker 26: to to start the next building

00:47:31 Speaker 26: and the next building as they

00:47:32 Speaker 26: fill up. But for absorption, we

00:47:35 Speaker 26: started with the first three, and

00:47:39 Speaker 26: we'd like that confidence to to

00:47:41 Speaker 26: move forward and continue to invest

00:47:42 Speaker 26: in more rental housing for the

00:47:44 Speaker 26: county of Grey. For the County

00:47:45 Speaker 26: of Gray, and so the requested

00:47:47 Speaker 26: motions really similar to option two

00:47:49 Speaker 26: in your staff report, where we're

00:47:54 Speaker 26: asking for a ten-year agreement, exempt

00:47:58 Speaker 26: the first phase, and delegate staff

00:47:59 Speaker 26: to approve future phases based on

00:48:01 Speaker 02: criteria of delivering rental housing. So

00:48:03 Speaker 02: that's the the ask, and just

00:48:05 Speaker 02: wanted to introduce who we are

00:48:07 Speaker 02: and what we do. Bayshore Street

00:48:10 Speaker 02: Development is just Base River Street

00:48:13 Speaker 02: Development is just the name of

00:48:15 Speaker 02: the company that owns the land.

00:48:16 Speaker 02: We are Skyline. We are. We

00:48:18 Speaker 02: own over a hundred million dollars

00:48:20 Speaker 02: of rental housing in the county

00:48:24 Speaker 02: of Gray, and we're investing another

00:48:26 Speaker 02: two hundred million dollars over the

00:48:27 Speaker 02: next few years because of what

00:48:30 Speaker 10: this council has done and what

00:48:32 Speaker 10: staff policies created to make it

00:48:35 Speaker 10: possible and give people great places

00:48:36 Speaker 10: to live. Okay. Well, thank you

00:48:42 Speaker 10: very much, Mr. Jones. for the

00:48:44 Speaker 10: presentation. It sounds like you're a

00:48:49 Speaker 27: busy fellow with with your partners.

00:48:51 Speaker 26: Are there any? We do, as

00:48:54 Speaker 26: you mentioned, there is a staff

00:48:57 Speaker 26: report upcoming in this meeting later.

00:48:58 Speaker 26: Maybe not so later, depending on

00:49:01 Speaker 26: how council feels about it. But

00:49:04 Speaker 26: anyway, there is a staff report

00:49:05 Speaker 26: there. Are there any? But for

00:49:08 Speaker 26: now, are there any questions from

00:49:11 Speaker 26: council? Councillor Niels. Thank you very

00:49:15 Speaker 26: much, Deputy Warden. Just a quick

00:49:16 Speaker 28: question: You you spoken to the

00:49:18 Speaker 26: You've spoken to the purpose-built rental

00:49:19 Speaker 26: units. Is there a percentage that

00:49:20 Speaker 26: is being targeted for affordable housing

00:49:23 Speaker 26: rental units in this project, or

00:49:25 Speaker 26: is it just market rate? Mr.

00:49:28 Speaker 26: Jones, through the deputy warden, it

00:49:30 Speaker 26: is all market housing. We try

00:49:33 Speaker 26: to build more supply for the

00:49:34 Speaker 26: province of Ontario. We're we're open

00:49:36 Speaker 26: to additional grants to create deeply

00:49:37 Speaker 26: affordable. rentals, but we do try

00:49:38 Speaker 26: to target the average income in

00:49:45 Speaker 19: in a community. And if we

00:49:48 Speaker 19: charge too much, they would just

00:49:49 Speaker 19: buy a home. So we have

00:49:51 Speaker 19: to keep it affordable. From my

00:49:53 Speaker 19: perspective, deeply affordable, open to additional

00:50:01 Speaker 19: grants to make it more affordable.

00:50:05 Speaker 19: Just it's just math for us.

00:50:08 Speaker 19: We don't we're not against it.

00:50:13 Speaker 19: We do it all the time.

00:50:16 Speaker 19: City of Berry, we did ten

00:50:17 Speaker 19: percent affordable in the first tower

00:50:19 Speaker 19: through grants. through their CIP programme.

00:50:22 Speaker 19: Okay, thank you. Any other questions

00:50:25 Speaker 19: from council? Okay, not seeing any

00:50:26 Speaker 19: further questions for now. Thank you

00:50:29 Speaker 19: very much, Mr. Jones. And as

00:50:35 Speaker 19: indicated, there is a staff report

00:50:38 Speaker 08: later in the meeting. Thank you

00:50:40 Speaker 08: very much. Thank you, W. Warden.

00:50:42 Speaker 08: Okay, moving on. We have a

00:50:47 Speaker 08: consent agenda there. A number of

00:50:49 Speaker 08: items. Are any of those required

00:50:50 Speaker 08: to be removed for further discussion,

00:50:52 Speaker 08: Councillor Gregg? Councillor Gregg, six A,

00:50:53 Speaker 08: please. Six A, did you say?

00:50:55 Speaker 08: Okay. Any others, Councillor McQueen? Thank

00:50:59 Speaker 08: you, Deputy Warden. Six B. Okay,

00:51:01 Speaker 08: six B. Any others? All right.

00:51:04 Speaker 08: I'd take a mover and a

00:51:07 Speaker 08: seconder to deal with the others.

00:51:11 Speaker 08: Councillor Ackles, Councillor Bordignon. Any further

00:51:15 Speaker 08: discussion? All those in favour? That

00:51:17 Speaker 08: is carried, and we will deal

00:51:19 Speaker 08: with those two items later in

00:51:21 Speaker 08: the meeting. So we now come

00:51:24 Speaker 08: to the matters that require further

00:51:25 Speaker 08: direction and discussion. Is there an

00:51:27 Speaker 29: appetite to move the skyline report

00:51:30 Speaker 29: up to the first item? Anyone

00:51:31 Speaker 29: object to that, Councillor Nielsen? You're

00:51:32 Speaker 29: good with that. Do we need

00:51:33 Speaker 29: a motion, Madam Clerk? No, I

00:51:35 Speaker 29: think we'll just go on consensus.

00:51:37 Speaker 29: I don't see any objection, so

00:51:39 Speaker 29: we'll deal with item seven D

00:51:40 Speaker 29: first, which is the Skyline report.

00:51:42 Speaker 29: If someone would like to make

00:51:44 Speaker 29: make the motion to that is

00:51:46 Speaker 29: recommended, Councillor Debrine and Councillor Hutchison.

00:51:49 Speaker 29: Okay, welcome, Scott. Floor is yours,

00:51:52 Speaker 29: sir. Yeah, thank you. Good morning,

00:51:53 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden, and members of Council,

00:51:55 Speaker 29: and those that might be. The

00:51:57 Speaker 29: council and and those that might

00:51:58 Speaker 29: be tuning in today. So this

00:51:59 Speaker 29: report, as as indicated in in

00:52:00 Speaker 29: the title bar, was a team

00:52:04 Speaker 29: effort. This was was done by

00:52:06 Speaker 29: Mary Lou and and Lacy and

00:52:07 Speaker 29: myself. I'm just the lucky one

00:52:10 Speaker 29: that gets to speak with you

00:52:11 Speaker 29: because maybe I like hearing my

00:52:14 Speaker 29: own voice the most. I'm not

00:52:16 Speaker 29: sure, but I'll try not to

00:52:17 Speaker 29: to go over what Greg

00:52:21 Speaker 29: has already shared. And and and

00:52:24 Speaker 29: first off, I do want to

00:52:27 Speaker 29: reiterate the fact that staff are

00:52:31 Speaker 29: thrilled that companies like Skyline are

00:52:34 Speaker 29: are choosing to invest in our

00:52:35 Speaker 29: communities and. and more importantly, choosing

00:52:37 Speaker 29: to invest in rental housing. For

00:52:39 Speaker 29: years, many years ago, we were

00:52:42 Speaker 29: seeing a slowdown in rental builds,

00:52:43 Speaker 29: and and so the past, you

00:52:45 Speaker 29: know, five or six years, we

00:52:48 Speaker 29: we've really seen an increase in

00:52:49 Speaker 29: the number of rental units, and

00:52:51 Speaker 29: we're really thrilled that that both

00:52:53 Speaker 29: local developers and and those from

00:52:55 Speaker 29: maybe slightly further afield are choosing

00:52:58 Speaker 29: to invest in in rental in

00:52:59 Speaker 29: our communities in that regard. Just

00:53:01 Speaker 29: as a bit of background to

00:53:04 Speaker 29: council, for the last number of

00:53:06 Speaker 29: years, county staff have regular. County

00:53:07 Speaker 29: staff have regularly entered into what

00:53:09 Speaker 29: we call development charges exemption agreements

00:53:11 Speaker 29: for purpose-built rental housing, and and

00:53:13 Speaker 29: so these these agreements are under

00:53:15 Speaker 29: policy eleven dash one that that

00:53:18 Speaker 29: council has delegated certain signing authorities

00:53:20 Speaker 29: to the director of finance and

00:53:23 Speaker 29: director of planning in that regard,

00:53:25 Speaker 29: and would allow within certain limits

00:53:27 Speaker 29: the county to enter into an

00:53:29 Speaker 29: exemption agreement whereby the developer doesn't

00:53:31 Speaker 29: have to pay the development charge

00:53:34 Speaker 29: up front. The development charge upfront,

00:53:36 Speaker 29: and furthermore, if if they abide

00:53:38 Speaker 29: by the the terms of the

00:53:41 Speaker 29: agreement for the duration of the

00:53:43 Speaker 29: agreement, they actually never have to

00:53:45 Speaker 29: to pay the development charge. And

00:53:48 Speaker 29: in broad strokes, usually what that

00:53:50 Speaker 29: agreement says is from from from

00:53:53 Speaker 29: the signing of the agreement, you

00:53:54 Speaker 29: have five years to to build

00:53:56 Speaker 29: development, and then from first occupancy,

00:53:57 Speaker 29: you need to keep the development

00:53:59 Speaker 29: as rental housing for a minimum

00:54:01 Speaker 29: of twenty years. In that regard,

00:54:03 Speaker 29: the development charge exemption agreements that

00:54:06 Speaker 29: the counties entered into to date.

00:54:07 Speaker 29: have not been tied to affordability,

00:54:10 Speaker 29: but they are tied to to

00:54:12 Speaker 29: being long-term rental units. So somebody

00:54:15 Speaker 29: can't condominiumize their development, if you

00:54:17 Speaker 29: will, and and nor do nor

00:54:22 Speaker 29: do they allow for short-term rentals

00:54:24 Speaker 29: on a nightly basis. In that

00:54:26 Speaker 29: regard, so at a background level,

00:54:29 Speaker 29: that's that's what what the development

00:54:32 Speaker 29: charge exemption agreements do. As we

00:54:33 Speaker 29: heard from Mr. Jones, these agreements

00:54:35 Speaker 29: have been very successful. We've talked

00:54:38 Speaker 29: to developers that that have told

00:54:42 Speaker 29: us that. that this really turned

00:54:43 Speaker 29: the tide between investing in gray

00:54:46 Speaker 29: or investing in another community. It

00:54:49 Speaker 29: really made them consider and reconsider

00:54:51 Speaker 29: investments in rental housing in that

00:54:53 Speaker 29: regard. And we're thrilled because that's

00:54:56 Speaker 29: the vision that county saw, a

00:54:58 Speaker 29: county council saw a few years

00:55:01 Speaker 29: ago, and to see it pan

00:55:03 Speaker 29: out and to see more units

00:55:05 Speaker 29: being built in that regard is

00:55:06 Speaker 29: is simply wonderful. And so to

00:55:07 Speaker 29: get into sort of the the

00:55:09 Speaker 29: meat and potatoes of of this

00:55:12 Speaker 29: particular development. as Mr. Jones noted,

00:55:14 Speaker 29: they are looking at building 712

00:55:16 Speaker 29: rental units across eight buildings. There

00:55:18 Speaker 29: will be 168 one-bedroom units, 544

00:55:21 Speaker 29: two-bedroom units. They have gotten permits

00:55:23 Speaker 29: and started construction on their first

00:55:25 Speaker 29: phase, which is 267 units across

00:55:28 Speaker 29: three separate buildings. As Mr. Jones

00:55:30 Speaker 29: mentioned, it's our understanding that City

00:55:31 Speaker 29: of Owen Sound has entered into

00:55:34 Speaker 29: a similar development charges exemption agreement

00:55:35 Speaker 29: for the duration. of of the

00:55:38 Speaker 29: the 712 units, rather than just

00:55:40 Speaker 29: the first phase. In this regard,

00:55:42 Speaker 29: I will note that staff are

00:55:44 Speaker 29: recommending that the county just enter

00:55:46 Speaker 29: into phase one for now, and

00:55:48 Speaker 29: that we consider future phases as

00:55:51 Speaker 29: as they get closer to coming

00:55:54 Speaker 29: online. In that regard, certainly we've

00:55:57 Speaker 29: had other developments whereby we we

00:55:58 Speaker 29: entered into a development charges exemption

00:56:00 Speaker 29: agreement for phase one, and then

00:56:02 Speaker 29: when they were ready to do

00:56:05 Speaker 29: phase two, they came back and

00:56:06 Speaker 29: and we entered into a second

00:56:08 Speaker 29: agreement in that regard. Certainly, understand

00:56:10 Speaker 29: from from Mr. Jones and his

00:56:12 Speaker 29: colleagues' perspectives why they'd want to

00:56:14 Speaker 29: enter into a development charges agreement

00:56:16 Speaker 29: for for the entirety upfront would

00:56:17 Speaker 29: certainly assist with with long term

00:56:20 Speaker 29: planning and financing in that regard.

00:56:21 Speaker 29: But from a staff perspective, we've

00:56:24 Speaker 29: seen a lot of change in

00:56:26 Speaker 29: the development charges sphere over the

00:56:28 Speaker 29: last five or six years. We

00:56:30 Speaker 29: are coming up on a review

00:56:32 Speaker 29: of the county's development charges. background

00:56:34 Speaker 29: study and bylaw next year, and

00:56:38 Speaker 29: and so that's the opportunity for

00:56:42 Speaker 29: for council and staff and the

00:56:44 Speaker 29: community to provide feedback on on

00:56:47 Speaker 29: what's appropriate within those development charges,

00:56:48 Speaker 29: and and some of what's appropriate

00:56:49 Speaker 29: might also be those those policies

00:56:51 Speaker 29: around the the exemption agreements in

00:56:53 Speaker 29: that regard. So what staff are

00:56:56 Speaker 29: recommending here is is just the

00:56:58 Speaker 29: slightly more cautious approach of entering

00:57:00 Speaker 29: into the development charges exemption agreement

00:57:04 Speaker 29: for phase one, and then considering

00:57:06 Speaker 29: each future. phase as they come

00:57:07 Speaker 29: along, based on both the legislation

00:57:08 Speaker 29: and the county's own policy, as

00:57:11 Speaker 29: as they come out in that

00:57:12 Speaker 29: regard, I should also mention there's

00:57:14 Speaker 29: a bit of an error in

00:57:15 Speaker 29: the report, and and and Mr.

00:57:17 Speaker 29: Jones's team was nice enough to

00:57:19 Speaker 29: alert alert us to that, and

00:57:21 Speaker 29: that comes in the financial and

00:57:24 Speaker 29: resource implications section. What you'll see

00:57:26 Speaker 29: in that financial and resource implications

00:57:29 Speaker 29: section is is the county staff

00:57:32 Speaker 29: have said that the total development

00:57:34 Speaker 29: charges would be approximately three point

00:57:36 Speaker 29: three million. Approximately 3.3 million for

00:57:40 Speaker 29: the entire thing, and 1.2 million

00:57:42 Speaker 29: for Phase One. County staff, in

00:57:45 Speaker 29: in preparing this, misinterpreted the development

00:57:46 Speaker 29: charges legislation in this regard around

00:57:49 Speaker 29: development charges rate freezes. And and

00:57:51 Speaker 29: not to let myself off the

00:57:53 Speaker 29: hook here, but it's easy to

00:57:55 Speaker 29: misinterpret because there's changes about every

00:57:56 Speaker 29: four months in this regard. But

00:57:57 Speaker 29: nevertheless, we misinterpreted it, and and

00:57:59 Speaker 29: so there is currently a rate

00:58:01 Speaker 29: freeze in place, which dates back

00:58:03 Speaker 29: to the. 2022 development charges rates.

00:58:07 Speaker 29: So, if we were to carry

00:58:09 Speaker 29: that forward, and and that rate

00:58:10 Speaker 29: freeze is in place for a

00:58:12 Speaker 29: time limited period, but it is

00:58:14 Speaker 29: currently in place for for certainly

00:58:16 Speaker 29: the the pulling of the first

00:58:17 Speaker 29: building permits, and depending on how

00:58:19 Speaker 29: quickly the development proceeds, it could

00:58:21 Speaker 29: be future building permits too. But

00:58:22 Speaker 29: that 3.3 million dollar number for

00:58:24 Speaker 29: the entire project goes to about

00:58:26 Speaker 29: 2.6 million, and that 1.2 million

00:58:27 Speaker 29: for phase one goes to about

00:58:28 Speaker 29: 990 thousand. So the the dollar

00:58:30 Speaker 29: values are lower, but it doesn't

00:58:32 Speaker 29: change the staff recommendation in that

00:58:34 Speaker 29: because for the total development they're

00:58:36 Speaker 29: asking for a term and a

00:58:38 Speaker 08: dollar value that's beyond our staff

00:58:42 Speaker 08: delegated signing authority, we'd still need

00:58:43 Speaker 08: to go to council in this

00:58:46 Speaker 08: regard. So just to reiterate, we're

00:58:47 Speaker 08: recommending entering into phase one for

00:58:48 Speaker 08: now. There is already a temporary

00:58:49 Speaker 10: deferral agreement in place, so they've

00:58:51 Speaker 10: been allowed to proceed and get

00:58:53 Speaker 10: the permit. So that doesn't change.

00:58:55 Speaker 10: And get their permit, so that

00:58:57 Speaker 10: doesn't change. And then that we'd

00:59:00 Speaker 10: consider each phase as it goes.

00:59:02 Speaker 10: That said, certainly if council

00:59:05 Speaker 10: wants to consider another option, there

00:59:08 Speaker 10: is a further option considered in

00:59:09 Speaker 10: the report, and and similar to

00:59:10 Speaker 10: what Mister Jones has presented us

00:59:12 Speaker 10: here today. So maybe just before

00:59:14 Speaker 10: turning it over to to questions,

00:59:17 Speaker 10: I'll just see with Lacy and

00:59:19 Speaker 10: Mary Lou. Have I missed anything,

00:59:21 Speaker 10: or anything you'd like to clarify?

00:59:22 Speaker 10: Okay. With that, turn it back

00:59:25 Speaker 10: to you, Deputy Warden. Thank you.

00:59:28 Speaker 10: Thank you, Scott. And as Scott

00:59:30 Speaker 10: mentioned, there is. another option. So

00:59:34 Speaker 10: I want to be clear that

00:59:35 Speaker 10: the mover and seconder understand that

00:59:37 Speaker 10: they move to support option one.

00:59:40 Speaker 29: Is that okay? Very good. So

00:59:42 Speaker 29: that's that's the motion on the

00:59:43 Speaker 29: floor is to support staff's recommendation.

00:59:45 Speaker 29: Councillor Nielsen, please. Thank you very

00:59:47 Speaker 29: much, Deputy Warden. Just a question

00:59:49 Speaker 29: for you, Scott. The you kind

00:59:52 Speaker 29: of joked about it that every

00:59:54 Speaker 29: four months we're seeing changes in

00:59:56 Speaker 29: the development charges, and currently there's

00:59:58 Speaker 29: a lot of rhetoric coming from

01:00:00 Speaker 29: both the province and the federal

01:00:05 Speaker 29: government about development charges and and

01:00:07 Speaker 29: housing. Charges and housing. My question

01:00:08 Speaker 29: for you is: If we enter

01:00:10 Speaker 29: into an agreement like this, how

01:00:12 Speaker 29: binding is it? If the province

01:00:12 Speaker 29: and federal governments change development charges

01:00:15 Speaker 29: to be zero for purpose-built rental

01:00:16 Speaker 29: housing, which is kind of the

01:00:18 Speaker 29: conversation we're hearing that they want

01:00:20 Speaker 29: to see them be removed or

01:00:23 Speaker 29: limited or scaled back. And so,

01:00:25 Speaker 29: my question is: Is it almost

01:00:29 Speaker 29: a benefit to the developer to

01:00:31 Speaker 29: enter into the agreement for phase

01:00:32 Speaker 29: one because we're binding them on

01:00:34 Speaker 29: on this? We're binding them on

01:00:36 Speaker 29: on on this portion, rather than

01:00:38 Speaker 29: binding them if their province changes

01:00:40 Speaker 29: anything, and and kind of I'm

01:00:43 Speaker 15: trying to understand the implications that

01:00:46 Speaker 15: way. Through you, Mr. Deputy Warden,

01:00:52 Speaker 15: that is a great question, Councillor

01:00:53 Speaker 15: Nielsen. I wish I had an

01:00:54 Speaker 15: answer for you. It's it's something

01:00:57 Speaker 15: that staff have also been struggling

01:00:58 Speaker 15: with, and and certainly can't. I'm

01:01:00 Speaker 15: not in any way qualified to

01:01:02 Speaker 15: provide legal advice or or speculate

01:01:06 Speaker 15: on what future legislation would say,

01:01:09 Speaker 29: but from a lay perspective, I

01:01:11 Speaker 29: would say if the province were

01:01:15 Speaker 29: to make future for changes in

01:01:17 Speaker 29: that regard, it might depend on

01:01:19 Speaker 29: sort of the transition provisions and/or

01:01:20 Speaker 29: how far-reaching that legislation spoke to.

01:01:22 Speaker 29: You know whether it impacts on

01:01:24 Speaker 29: a go-forward only basis or whether

01:01:25 Speaker 29: there's some sort of retroactivity clause

01:01:26 Speaker 29: in that regard. But I think

01:01:29 Speaker 29: to give a more fulsome answer,

01:01:32 Speaker 29: a we'd need to know what

01:01:35 Speaker 29: the province is is proposing or

01:01:36 Speaker 29: putting in place, and and

01:01:39 Speaker 29: then b we'd need to consult

01:01:42 Speaker 29: our. legal counsel on that. Thank

01:01:44 Speaker 29: you, Scott. Any other councillor body,

01:01:45 Speaker 29: please. Thank you. Question from Mr.

01:01:47 Speaker 29: Taylor. Approximately, I don't know, a

01:01:49 Speaker 29: couple of weeks ago, so not

01:01:52 Speaker 29: approximate at all. We got a

01:01:53 Speaker 29: letter from the Ontario government that

01:01:56 Speaker 29: development charges. There is a

01:01:58 Speaker 29: policy change at the provincial level

01:02:01 Speaker 29: with regard to deferrals. Does our

01:02:03 Speaker 29: Grey County policy match what the

01:02:04 Speaker 29: province is suggesting? Through you, Deputy

01:02:07 Speaker 29: Warden, and I might have to

01:02:08 Speaker 29: rely on on Lacey for some

01:02:09 Speaker 29: of those two. Essentially, the the

01:02:11 Speaker 29: letter that we got from the

01:02:14 Speaker 29: province. One of the things that's

01:02:16 Speaker 29: changing in there is they're now

01:02:18 Speaker 29: allowing for a deferred payment until

01:02:19 Speaker 29: occupancy for some classes of residential

01:02:25 Speaker 29: development that weren't otherwise eligible for

01:02:27 Speaker 29: such deferred payments under the previous

01:02:29 Speaker 29: legislation in that regard. So more

01:02:31 Speaker 30: specifically, and and not to be

01:02:32 Speaker 30: so cryptic. Specifically, and not to

01:02:32 Speaker 30: be so cryptic, if you're wanting

01:02:34 Speaker 30: to build a new single detached

01:02:36 Speaker 30: home, you now have the option.

01:02:39 Speaker 30: My understanding is to pay it

01:02:40 Speaker 30: upfront, or you can pay it

01:02:42 Speaker 30: at the time of occupancy. These

01:02:44 Speaker 30: were changes that were enacted through

01:02:46 Speaker 30: Bill 17, and and then formally

01:02:48 Speaker 30: put into effect as of November

01:02:50 Speaker 30: 3rd of this year. So we're

01:02:51 Speaker 30: working with municipal treasurers, municipal CBOs,

01:02:53 Speaker 30: and planners to understand what that

01:02:55 Speaker 30: means and how that gets tracked,

01:02:57 Speaker 30: particularly at the municipal level. we've

01:03:03 Speaker 30: actually just scheduled an education session

01:03:05 Speaker 30: on this with with somebody from

01:03:07 Speaker 30: Hempstead presenting on December fourth to

01:03:09 Speaker 30: help fill us in on this.

01:03:11 Speaker 30: It's my understanding that our current

01:03:14 Speaker 29: development charges exemption agreements for rental

01:03:16 Speaker 29: housing would still be on line

01:03:20 Speaker 29: with the new changes because the

01:03:22 Speaker 29: new changes tended to impact other

01:03:24 Speaker 29: types. But my understanding through talking

01:03:26 Speaker 29: to our legal services staff, and

01:03:28 Speaker 29: this is where I defer to

01:03:30 Speaker 29: Lacy, is there might be some

01:03:31 Speaker 29: changes specifically with respect to how

01:03:32 Speaker 29: we register such agreements, but to

01:03:34 Speaker 29: go any deeper into that, I

01:03:38 Speaker 29: need somebody smarter than I am.

01:03:40 Speaker 29: Councillor Bordenil, please. Thank you, Mr.

01:03:43 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden, and through you, Mr.

01:03:45 Speaker 29: Taylor Scott. In relation to you

01:03:47 Speaker 29: were just speaking, we do this

01:03:51 Speaker 29: in phases, which is I think

01:03:53 Speaker 29: is a good idea. But to

01:03:55 Speaker 29: Councillor Nielsen's first question to the

01:03:58 Speaker 29: deputy in regards to the attainable,

01:04:01 Speaker 29: we always work with the words

01:04:03 Speaker 29: attainable or affordable. The provincial policy

01:04:05 Speaker 29: statement states it should be around

01:04:08 Speaker 29: twenty percent. When we're looking at

01:04:10 Speaker 29: our review or for the next

01:04:11 Speaker 29: phases, do we wait? Will we

01:04:14 Speaker 29: wait that heavier in, or do

01:04:15 Speaker 29: we wait for recommendations from the

01:04:17 Speaker 29: province to to match the PPS

01:04:19 Speaker 29: of approximately twenty percent to make

01:04:20 Speaker 29: it not just market, but at

01:04:22 Speaker 29: the eighty percent level? Thank you

01:04:26 Speaker 29: for your question, Councillor Borneon. That's

01:04:27 Speaker 29: a tricky one as well. So

01:04:31 Speaker 29: there's been some some changes to

01:04:34 Speaker 29: the DC Act over the years.

01:04:35 Speaker 29: and and there are thresholds for

01:04:38 Speaker 29: DCS. Excuse me for both rental

01:04:43 Speaker 29: and ownership, whereby if if they

01:04:45 Speaker 19: meet those affordability thresholds, then they

01:04:51 Speaker 19: simply don't need to pay the

01:04:53 Speaker 19: DCS. Again, it requires a similar

01:04:58 Speaker 19: agreement on title to to say

01:05:00 Speaker 19: that you need to maintain that.

01:05:03 Speaker 19: You know, it can't be just

01:05:05 Speaker 19: at the time of your building

01:05:17 Speaker 19: permits that you meet that. So,

01:05:20 Speaker 19: if strictly speaking, if they were

01:05:21 Speaker 31: affordable based on the the provincial

01:05:26 Speaker 29: definition, then they. wouldn't need to

01:05:29 Speaker 29: enter into this type of exemption

01:05:31 Speaker 29: agreement with the county because they'd

01:05:32 Speaker 29: be exempt provincially, so to speak.

01:05:35 Speaker 29: If we wanted to get into

01:05:37 Speaker 29: as part of the development charges

01:05:38 Speaker 29: review a further discussion on attainability

01:05:40 Speaker 29: or some other threshold beyond sort

01:05:42 Speaker 29: of that provincial affordability limit, I

01:05:44 Speaker 29: think we'd really want to consult

01:05:45 Speaker 29: heavily with with the development charges

01:05:47 Speaker 29: consultant and legal at the time.

01:05:49 Speaker 29: the province has talked about, you

01:05:50 Speaker 29: know, further definition of attainability, and

01:05:52 Speaker 29: there's been some speculation that that

01:05:53 Speaker 29: might be more of a modular

01:05:55 Speaker 29: unit, but we don't have a

01:05:56 Speaker 29: specific definition at the county level

01:05:58 Speaker 29: or at the provincial level just

01:05:59 Speaker 29: yet for what attainability is. Yeah,

01:06:00 Speaker 29: I think I'll probably leave it

01:06:04 Speaker 29: there for now, unless there's any

01:06:06 Speaker 29: further clarification. Okay, thank you. Any

01:06:08 Speaker 29: further questions? Not seeing any questions.

01:06:10 Speaker 29: I'll call the question. All those

01:06:12 Speaker 29: in favour? That is carried. Thank

01:06:13 Speaker 29: you, Scott. Okay, going back to

01:06:16 Speaker 29: the start of our direction and

01:06:19 Speaker 29: discussion. Bill sixty, Fighting Delays

01:06:21 Speaker 29: and Building Faster Act. That is

01:06:24 Speaker 29: a report from Scott Taylor. So

01:06:27 Speaker 29: I need a mover and seconder

01:06:29 Speaker 29: to Councillor Dicker and Councillor Carlton.

01:06:32 Speaker 29: Scott, floor is yours, sir. Great.

01:06:33 Speaker 29: I'll just my controlling Brittany. Are

01:06:34 Speaker 29: you? Sorry, I was just

01:06:36 Speaker 29: talking to Brittany about the slides.

01:06:38 Speaker 29: My apologies. Excellent. Thank you. All

01:06:40 Speaker 29: right. Thank you again. So this

01:06:42 Speaker 29: this report. I apologize. There wasn't

01:06:43 Speaker 29: a report based on the timelines

01:06:45 Speaker 29: here, but this presentation. really was

01:06:48 Speaker 29: a team effort in this regard.

01:06:51 Speaker 29: Maybe we'll just go to the

01:06:53 Speaker 29: next slide here. So Bill sixty

01:06:56 Speaker 29: is is another one of the

01:06:58 Speaker 29: provinces omnibus bills in this regard.

01:06:59 Speaker 29: And some of you would have

01:07:01 Speaker 29: gotten a sneak peek at elements

01:07:02 Speaker 29: of this presentation last week for

01:07:05 Speaker 29: those of you that attended the

01:07:08 Speaker 29: Planning and Economic Development Advisory Committee.

01:07:09 Speaker 29: I promise this will be a

01:07:11 Speaker 29: much better presentation this time because

01:07:12 Speaker 29: we have both Nile and Chair,

01:07:14 Speaker 29: and also speaking to elements of

01:07:15 Speaker 29: it. So you won't just have

01:07:18 Speaker 29: to listen to me. So it'll

01:07:21 Speaker 29: be great. So, so again, this

01:07:23 Speaker 29: is this is an omnibus bill.

01:07:25 Speaker 29: It touches on a number of

01:07:28 Speaker 29: different functions that that the county's

01:07:30 Speaker 29: done in this regard. And so,

01:07:31 Speaker 29: in pulling together these slides and

01:07:33 Speaker 29: and in pulling together some potential

01:07:34 Speaker 29: county comments on this bill, it's

01:07:35 Speaker 29: involved climate change staff, transportation services

01:07:36 Speaker 29: staff, finances finance staff, community services,

01:07:37 Speaker 29: CAO and deputy legal services. So,

01:07:39 Speaker 29: it really is a team effort,

01:07:41 Speaker 29: and and certainly value the the

01:07:42 Speaker 29: collabouration in that regard. we also,

01:07:43 Speaker 29: as I said, heard some feedback

01:07:45 Speaker 29: from the Planning and Economic Development

01:07:46 Speaker 29: Advisory Committee last week. I know

01:07:48 Speaker 29: within our own professional networks, a

01:07:49 Speaker 29: number of us are consulting to

01:07:51 Speaker 29: hear what others are saying and

01:07:55 Speaker 29: thinking in this regard. And in

01:07:57 Speaker 29: that aspect, we had a local

01:07:58 Speaker 29: planners meeting this past Friday morning,

01:08:00 Speaker 29: where we dug into this further.

01:08:02 Speaker 29: As with any large provincial change,

01:08:03 Speaker 29: there's some good changes, there's some

01:08:06 Speaker 29: positive elements that staff would be

01:08:08 Speaker 29: quite excited about if this. were

01:08:10 Speaker 29: to take effect. There's some that

01:08:12 Speaker 29: that we definitely have concerns with,

01:08:14 Speaker 29: and there's some where where we're

01:08:17 Speaker 29: simply it's simply unknown as to

01:08:19 Speaker 29: what the impacts could be at

01:08:22 Speaker 29: this time. I would say, and

01:08:25 Speaker 29: it it leads into our discussion

01:08:26 Speaker 29: we just had on development charges.

01:08:28 Speaker 29: Sort of the speed of change

01:08:29 Speaker 29: and the frequency of change is

01:08:31 Speaker 29: is really difficult to to continually

01:08:32 Speaker 29: adapt to and and adjust to

01:08:35 Speaker 29: in that regard. Not just reviewing

01:08:36 Speaker 29: the the draft legislation, but then

01:08:38 Speaker 29: starting to relearn elements. of your

01:08:40 Speaker 29: job as as those changes take

01:08:42 Speaker 29: effect, and and they don't all

01:08:45 Speaker 29: take effect at the same time.

01:08:46 Speaker 29: So you know, you suddenly find

01:08:48 Speaker 29: out, okay, well, November third is

01:08:50 Speaker 29: the deadline for this, and now

01:08:52 Speaker 29: we got to figure out what

01:08:53 Speaker 29: this means. So so I will

01:08:54 Speaker 29: say, and and certainly not looking

01:08:57 Speaker 29: for sympathy or anything else in

01:09:00 Speaker 29: this regard. But you know, we

01:09:02 Speaker 29: want to be partners with the

01:09:04 Speaker 29: province. We want to continue to

01:09:06 Speaker 29: work with the province to to

01:09:09 Speaker 29: achieve their objectives because many of

01:09:11 Speaker 29: their objectives match very closely with

01:09:13 Speaker 29: with county council state objectives. But

01:09:15 Speaker 29: if if there could be at

01:09:16 Speaker 29: at sometimes maybe. Could be at

01:09:18 Speaker 29: sometimes maybe just a brief slowdown

01:09:20 Speaker 29: in the change to adjust and

01:09:22 Speaker 29: catch up. That would certainly be

01:09:23 Speaker 29: very appreciated in that regard. I

01:09:25 Speaker 29: will finally also say that there

01:09:27 Speaker 29: are a number of legislative changes

01:09:30 Speaker 29: that have been directly announced through

01:09:32 Speaker 29: Bill sixty, and then there's some

01:09:36 Speaker 29: further changes that aren't actually changes

01:09:39 Speaker 29: to the legislation, but associated consultations

01:09:40 Speaker 29: of topics that the province wants

01:09:42 Speaker 29: to look further into, and and

01:09:43 Speaker 29: some of those consultations were teased

01:09:46 Speaker 29: back in the spring or. were

01:09:48 Speaker 29: first thought of back in the

01:09:51 Speaker 29: spring when we had Bill five

01:09:53 Speaker 29: and Bill seventeen in that regard,

01:09:55 Speaker 29: and so the province is

01:09:57 Speaker 29: picking up on some of the

01:10:00 Speaker 29: threads that that they had that

01:10:01 Speaker 29: started back then. With respect to

01:10:03 Speaker 29: some of the changes that that

01:10:05 Speaker 29: impact sort of the planning and

01:10:07 Speaker 29: development portfolio, I think maybe the

01:10:07 Speaker 29: one that I'm personally most excited

01:10:09 Speaker 29: about is is there's a proposal

01:10:11 Speaker 29: in place that the province would

01:10:13 Speaker 29: allow all upper tier municipalities the

01:10:14 Speaker 29: ability to offer community improvement plans.

01:10:16 Speaker 29: For those of you that might

01:10:17 Speaker 29: not live in British For those

01:10:19 Speaker 29: of you that might not live

01:10:22 Speaker 29: and breathe this on a daily

01:10:24 Speaker 29: basis, if prior to this change,

01:10:27 Speaker 29: this proposed change, only a select

01:10:29 Speaker 29: few prescribed, upper-tier municipalities had the

01:10:31 Speaker 29: ability to offer community improvement plans.

01:10:33 Speaker 29: So Gray County wasn't in that

01:10:35 Speaker 29: prescribed list. Gray, Bruce, and Simcoe

01:10:37 Speaker 29: have all been talking to provincial

01:10:38 Speaker 29: staff and asking the province, you

01:10:39 Speaker 29: know, could could we have the

01:10:41 Speaker 29: ability to offer such a community

01:10:43 Speaker 29: improvement plan? And so, if this

01:10:45 Speaker 29: change were to go through, then

01:10:47 Speaker 29: it would give county council the

01:10:49 Speaker 29: ability if they saw. fit to

01:10:50 Speaker 29: to direct staff to work on

01:10:52 Speaker 29: preparing a community improvement plan and

01:10:55 Speaker 29: and through that plan we could

01:10:58 Speaker 29: really target specific county initiatives and

01:11:00 Speaker 29: and so one of those might

01:11:01 Speaker 29: be further sort of incentives or

01:11:03 Speaker 29: or policies on on affordable housing

01:11:04 Speaker 29: in that regard or attainable housing

01:11:06 Speaker 29: in that regard so this is

01:11:09 Speaker 29: one of the changes that that

01:11:10 Speaker 29: kudos to the province this would

01:11:12 Speaker 29: would make a direct impact locally

01:11:14 Speaker 29: across the province some of the

01:11:15 Speaker 29: other changes they're consulting on have

01:11:19 Speaker 29: to do with streamlining the land

01:11:21 Speaker 29: use planning and building permit application

01:11:23 Speaker 29: processes. At our local planners meeting

01:11:25 Speaker 29: this this past Friday, this was

01:11:26 Speaker 29: a big topic of discussion. We

01:11:28 Speaker 29: actually had a few chief building

01:11:31 Speaker 29: officials in in the in attendance

01:11:32 Speaker 29: as well, so it was great

01:11:34 Speaker 29: to hear their perspective in that

01:11:36 Speaker 29: regard. And I think we'd all

01:11:38 Speaker 29: agree, any process can always be

01:11:40 Speaker 29: streamlined. We can do better, for

01:11:43 Speaker 29: sure. There's there's no doubt about

01:11:44 Speaker 29: that. Some of what the province

01:11:46 Speaker 29: is looking at here is looking

01:11:48 Speaker 29: at the use of technology to

01:11:49 Speaker 29: to streamline those processes. So maybe

01:11:50 Speaker 29: a further reliance on on artificial

01:11:51 Speaker 29: intelligence in that regard. They're also

01:11:54 Speaker 29: looking at maybe using common metrics

01:11:56 Speaker 29: or platforms for data tracking. So

01:11:58 Speaker 29: you know, I think there are

01:12:00 Speaker 29: elements that could be very positive

01:12:01 Speaker 29: here. I think with respect to

01:12:06 Speaker 29: this one, we just want to

01:12:08 Speaker 29: make sure that you know if

01:12:12 Speaker 29: if there were major changes in

01:12:15 Speaker 29: that regard, that they're they're phased

01:12:17 Speaker 29: in or people have enough runway

01:12:19 Speaker 29: to adjust. Or similarly, if the

01:12:20 Speaker 29: province does say we're going all

01:12:22 Speaker 29: to a common platform, and let's

01:12:24 Speaker 29: just say they're going to a

01:12:26 Speaker 29: common software platform in that regard,

01:12:27 Speaker 29: having respect for the costs and

01:12:28 Speaker 29: time it takes to change over

01:12:30 Speaker 29: in that regard. So, if there

01:12:31 Speaker 29: was provincial funding available to help

01:12:33 Speaker 29: with that transition, if there is

01:12:34 Speaker 29: to be a transition, that would

01:12:35 Speaker 29: certainly be appreciated. One of the

01:12:37 Speaker 29: other changes that the province is

01:12:40 Speaker 29: talking about is is consulting through

01:12:43 Speaker 29: the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and

01:12:44 Speaker 29: Housing to have a common framework

01:12:46 Speaker 29: or common platform. for official plans.

01:12:47 Speaker 29: Apparently, what what provincial staff and

01:12:50 Speaker 29: and politicians have been hearing is

01:12:54 Speaker 29: that official plans have have gotten

01:12:55 Speaker 29: too large and too unruly and

01:12:57 Speaker 29: too specific in that regard. So

01:12:58 Speaker 29: they'd like to offer some provincial

01:13:00 Speaker 29: guidance there, whereby we might be

01:13:01 Speaker 29: able to have a standard across

01:13:03 Speaker 29: the province. One of the things

01:13:04 Speaker 29: they've shared in the the environmental

01:13:07 Speaker 29: registry posting is what could perhaps

01:13:09 Speaker 29: be a standardized table of contents

01:13:10 Speaker 29: in that regard. Certainly, that's something

01:13:11 Speaker 29: that the Ontario provincial planners and

01:13:12 Speaker 29: The Ontario Professional Planners Institute has

01:13:13 Speaker 29: has been trying to work closely

01:13:15 Speaker 29: with the province on to put

01:13:16 Speaker 29: forward something that would meet the

01:13:19 Speaker 29: needs of the province and address

01:13:21 Speaker 29: the needs of of planners across

01:13:22 Speaker 29: the province. There are some again

01:13:23 Speaker 29: some abilities to streamline in that

01:13:25 Speaker 29: regard. One of the other things

01:13:26 Speaker 29: that the province has has stated

01:13:28 Speaker 29: here is they'd like to see

01:13:30 Speaker 29: official plans being more permissive and

01:13:31 Speaker 29: and and perhaps less overall land

01:13:34 Speaker 29: use designations in that regard within

01:13:36 Speaker 29: those standardized table of contents. We've

01:13:38 Speaker 29: heard comments locally that there's there's

01:13:39 Speaker 29: not specific comments related to either

01:13:42 Speaker 29: health and communities or climate change

01:13:43 Speaker 29: in that regard. Maybe maybe maybe

01:13:45 Speaker 29: those are two topics that are

01:13:48 Speaker 29: just pervasive and and go through,

01:13:49 Speaker 29: you know, all the different sections

01:13:51 Speaker 29: of the plan. But certainly those

01:13:55 Speaker 29: are two very big topics that

01:13:57 Speaker 29: we'd like to see considered in

01:13:59 Speaker 29: that regard. The one other thing

01:14:01 Speaker 29: I'd say here is is that

01:14:03 Speaker 29: one of the other things the

01:14:05 Speaker 29: province is also throwing out as

01:14:07 Speaker 29: part of this potential consultation is

01:14:10 Speaker 29: just a a maximum page limit

01:14:13 Speaker 29: for official plans. and and you

01:14:15 Speaker 29: know you can maybe draw your

01:14:16 Speaker 29: own conclusions on that regard. We

01:14:18 Speaker 29: think you know there's room for

01:14:20 Speaker 29: some standardization, but maybe that page

01:14:22 Speaker 29: limit is is a tough one.

01:14:23 Speaker 29: You know, arguably, and and not

01:14:25 Speaker 29: to pick on anyone here, but

01:14:27 Speaker 29: the town of Hanover official plan

01:14:28 Speaker 29: and the city of Toronto official

01:14:30 Speaker 29: plan probably don't need to be

01:14:32 Speaker 29: the same number of pages. And

01:14:33 Speaker 29: and I don't think specifically a

01:14:36 Speaker 29: number of our great county official

01:14:38 Speaker 29: plans were were sort of you

01:14:41 Speaker 29: know oh unruly in that regard,

01:14:42 Speaker 29: but you know. Fully in that

01:14:44 Speaker 29: regard, but you know we can

01:14:46 Speaker 29: we can sharpen our pencils. One

01:14:48 Speaker 29: of the other things we've worked

01:14:50 Speaker 29: on locally here in terms of

01:14:51 Speaker 29: that streamlining is the fact that

01:14:53 Speaker 29: we are in a two-tier municipal

01:14:54 Speaker 29: government system. Where can we find

01:14:57 Speaker 29: ways not to say things twice?

01:14:58 Speaker 29: And so, if it's already in

01:15:02 Speaker 29: the county plan, you know we

01:15:03 Speaker 29: don't potentially need to restate that

01:15:04 Speaker 29: in a municipal master plan. And

01:15:05 Speaker 29: municipalities have been wonderful at working

01:15:07 Speaker 29: together in that regard. Some of

01:15:09 Speaker 29: the other changes they're looking at

01:15:12 Speaker 29: would be prohibiting the requirement for

01:15:14 Speaker 29: green roof or other roof surfaces

01:15:16 Speaker 29: bylaw. Certainly in the press this.

01:15:18 Speaker 29: has drawn a lot of attention,

01:15:20 Speaker 29: and they've specifically noted the city

01:15:21 Speaker 29: of Toronto's green roof bylaw in

01:15:23 Speaker 29: that regard. We don't have any

01:15:25 Speaker 29: such bylaws like that in place

01:15:27 Speaker 29: in Grey County, and the province

01:15:28 Speaker 29: has specified that they would be

01:15:30 Speaker 29: prohibiting the mandatory use. But if

01:15:32 Speaker 29: developers still wanted to build to

01:15:34 Speaker 29: those those standards, then of course

01:15:37 Speaker 29: they could in that regard. They're

01:15:38 Speaker 29: also looking at making changes to

01:15:41 Speaker 29: the minister's zoning order process, whereby

01:15:43 Speaker 29: they'd no longer need to. be

01:15:46 Speaker 29: passed via regulation, and and so

01:15:47 Speaker 29: the province could could potentially pass

01:15:49 Speaker 29: those in a more expedient fashion.

01:15:50 Speaker 29: For those of you that weren't

01:15:52 Speaker 29: at the Planning and Economic Development

01:15:54 Speaker 29: Advisory Committee, Councillor Nielsen asked a

01:15:57 Speaker 29: wonderful question in that regard that

01:15:58 Speaker 29: I still haven't been able to

01:16:00 Speaker 29: find the answer to. But essentially,

01:16:01 Speaker 29: his his question, if I can

01:16:02 Speaker 29: restate it, was along the lines

01:16:05 Speaker 29: of: If you have a minister's

01:16:07 Speaker 29: zoning order that's in place, and

01:16:09 Speaker 29: and if it gets put in

01:16:10 Speaker 29: place not through regulation, is it?

01:16:12 Speaker 29: easier to then amend if you

01:16:16 Speaker 29: need some local flexibility in that

01:16:17 Speaker 29: regard? And and so you know,

01:16:18 Speaker 29: in terms of the most recent

01:16:21 Speaker 29: minister's zoning orders in the county,

01:16:23 Speaker 29: we had three in Southgate a

01:16:25 Speaker 29: few years ago, and and I

01:16:28 Speaker 29: know there's there's pros and cons

01:16:29 Speaker 29: to those, but one of the

01:16:32 Speaker 29: challenges is once the the minister's

01:16:35 Speaker 29: zoning order is put in place

01:16:37 Speaker 29: by regulation, it's not as simple

01:16:39 Speaker 29: as just amending your zoning bylaw

01:16:41 Speaker 29: anymore through municipal council. Suddenly it

01:16:43 Speaker 29: it it means going back to

01:16:46 Speaker 29: the province in that regard. So.

01:16:48 Speaker 29: one of the the questions here

01:16:50 Speaker 29: that we'd be asking through these

01:16:52 Speaker 29: comments is, if this is enacted,

01:16:53 Speaker 29: no longer needing regulations, would there

01:16:54 Speaker 29: be further flexibility post MZOs being

01:16:56 Speaker 29: in place to look at changes

01:16:57 Speaker 29: in that regard? Speaking of MZOs,

01:17:00 Speaker 29: one of further changes they're looking

01:17:02 Speaker 29: at, and and they talked about

01:17:04 Speaker 29: this back in the spring too,

01:17:05 Speaker 29: is potentially carving out an exception

01:17:07 Speaker 29: such that the minister's decision would

01:17:09 Speaker 29: no longer need to be consistent

01:17:11 Speaker 29: with the provincial planning statement or

01:17:13 Speaker 29: provincial plans in this regard. They

01:17:17 Speaker 29: noted that this would allow the.

01:17:19 Speaker 29: ministry more flexibility to act nimbly

01:17:21 Speaker 29: on minister zoning orders or even

01:17:24 Speaker 29: the approval of official plans. You

01:17:25 Speaker 29: probably guess this didn't land real

01:17:27 Speaker 29: well with the planners. We like

01:17:28 Speaker 29: our rules, and and no doubt

01:17:30 Speaker 29: there needs to be some flexibility.

01:17:33 Speaker 29: But but if if the province

01:17:35 Speaker 29: is is the one sort of

01:17:36 Speaker 29: setting these rules at a provincial

01:17:39 Speaker 29: level through documents like the provincial

01:17:43 Speaker 29: planning statement or provincial plans, then

01:17:45 Speaker 29: it sort of feels like we

01:17:48 Speaker 29: should we should all be singing

01:17:50 Speaker 29: from the same songbook in that

01:17:52 Speaker 29: regard. so staff did have some

01:17:54 Speaker 29: concerns in that regard. There was

01:17:56 Speaker 29: also a change looked at looking

01:17:58 Speaker 29: at reducing the use of record

01:18:01 Speaker 29: reducing the use of records of

01:18:03 Speaker 29: site condition in those situations where

01:18:06 Speaker 29: there's low potential for contamination. In

01:18:10 Speaker 29: terms of some of the other

01:18:13 Speaker 29: changes, again, this is one that

01:18:15 Speaker 29: was was talked about last spring.

01:18:17 Speaker 29: They've talked about regulation making authority

01:18:19 Speaker 29: for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs

01:18:21 Speaker 29: and Housing, whereby there could be

01:18:24 Speaker 29: it could reduce the need for

01:18:25 Speaker 29: minor. variances, where someone's looking at

01:18:26 Speaker 29: a variance within a prescribed percentage.

01:18:28 Speaker 29: They've specifically talked about this on

01:18:30 Speaker 29: urban residential lands, but you know,

01:18:32 Speaker 29: one one example could be, you

01:18:35 Speaker 29: know, if your if your front

01:18:36 Speaker 29: yard setback is is six metres

01:18:40 Speaker 29: and and in your bylaw, and

01:18:42 Speaker 29: someone's coming in at you know

01:18:43 Speaker 29: five point eight or something, maybe

01:18:46 Speaker 29: that's within that threshold that it

01:18:48 Speaker 29: could just automatically be approved. I

01:18:50 Speaker 29: think there's pros and cons here.

01:18:51 Speaker 29: You know, there is there is

01:18:52 Speaker 29: some benefit to some flexibility. but

01:18:55 Speaker 29: in some cases those setbacks were

01:18:57 Speaker 29: put in place for a very

01:18:59 Speaker 29: specific reason. Municipally might have to

01:19:00 Speaker 29: do with things like snow storage

01:19:03 Speaker 29: or municipal infrastructure or other such

01:19:07 Speaker 29: things. So the ability to still

01:19:09 Speaker 29: have some municipal say in that

01:19:10 Speaker 29: regard would certainly be be appreciated.

01:19:12 Speaker 29: They've also talked about a new

01:19:13 Speaker 29: section by section review of the

01:19:14 Speaker 29: building code to eliminate in inefficiencies

01:19:17 Speaker 29: while protecting safety. Some of you

01:19:19 Speaker 29: might be aware there were major

01:19:21 Speaker 29: changes to the building. Where there

01:19:24 Speaker 29: were major changes to the building

01:19:27 Speaker 29: code that just took effect earlier

01:19:30 Speaker 29: this year, in terms of talking

01:19:31 Speaker 29: to the few CBOs that we

01:19:33 Speaker 29: did, they noted, you know, again,

01:19:35 Speaker 29: similar to the official plans, there's

01:19:36 Speaker 29: always room for for further streamlining

01:19:39 Speaker 29: and further efficiencies. But with the

01:19:41 Speaker 29: the past direction on on harmonizing

01:19:42 Speaker 29: the provincial and national building codes

01:19:45 Speaker 29: here, it begs the question about

01:19:47 Speaker 29: whether or not this this review

01:19:50 Speaker 29: would be solely focused on looking

01:19:52 Speaker 29: at the province of Ontario, or

01:19:54 Speaker 29: whether this is moving. us closer

01:19:55 Speaker 29: to that stated goal of harmonizing

01:19:57 Speaker 29: the national and provincial building codes

01:20:00 Speaker 29: in that regard, they've also looked

01:20:01 Speaker 29: at more flexible permissions for allowing

01:20:02 Speaker 29: for on-farm septic systems for farm

01:20:04 Speaker 29: worker housing. In that regard, this

01:20:07 Speaker 29: would give greater authority to building

01:20:08 Speaker 29: officials to issue permits for septic

01:20:11 Speaker 29: systems under the building code that

01:20:12 Speaker 29: previously would have required Ministry of

01:20:13 Speaker 29: the Environment approval for. this, on

01:20:14 Speaker 29: the face of it, seems to

01:20:15 Speaker 29: have some merit. But but the

01:20:16 Speaker 29: way they're proposing this right now

01:20:17 Speaker 29: is not necessarily that you'd be

01:20:18 Speaker 29: issuing a permit for a larger

01:20:20 Speaker 29: septic system, but rather you could

01:20:21 Speaker 29: issue permits for a number of

01:20:23 Speaker 29: distributed septic systems across the across

01:20:25 Speaker 29: the farm. So you could have

01:20:28 Speaker 29: up to five ten thousand liter

01:20:30 Speaker 29: systems each on their own ten

01:20:31 Speaker 29: acre or four hectare chunk of

01:20:34 Speaker 29: the farm. And so you know,

01:20:37 Speaker 29: on the one hand, having more

01:20:39 Speaker 29: flexibility for farm work. Having more

01:20:41 Speaker 29: flexibility for farm worker housing, wonderful.

01:20:43 Speaker 29: On the other hand, you know,

01:20:45 Speaker 29: if we were going to have

01:20:47 Speaker 29: development on farm, I think from

01:20:48 Speaker 29: a land use planning perspective, we

01:20:50 Speaker 29: prefer that that development be relatively

01:20:52 Speaker 29: centralized and and not taking say

01:20:54 Speaker 29: farmland out of production at various

01:20:55 Speaker 29: different corners and chunks of the

01:20:59 Speaker 29: farm. So I think that's something

01:21:01 Speaker 29: that we'd like to you know

01:21:03 Speaker 29: submit comments and work with the

01:21:05 Speaker 29: province on to to look at

01:21:08 Speaker 29: some some tweaks there and and

01:21:10 Speaker 29: of course consult further with the

01:21:13 Speaker 29: building. officials in that regard. There's

01:21:14 Speaker 29: also consultations on the further use

01:21:16 Speaker 29: of communal water and wastewater systems.

01:21:19 Speaker 29: Certainly, this is a topic that

01:21:21 Speaker 29: AMO has also been very interested

01:21:24 Speaker 29: in and doing some some work

01:21:26 Speaker 29: there as well. For those of

01:21:27 Speaker 29: you that aren't familiar, when you're

01:21:30 Speaker 29: going beyond five or six units

01:21:32 Speaker 29: on a single system, then it

01:21:36 Speaker 29: becomes a communal system. And under

01:21:38 Speaker 29: the current policies, where you have

01:21:40 Speaker 29: those communal systems, developers aren't necessarily

01:21:42 Speaker 29: required. to build to a municipal

01:21:44 Speaker 29: standard, but prior to approving those

01:21:46 Speaker 29: systems, the municipality needs to enter

01:21:47 Speaker 29: into a responsibility agreement, basically to

01:21:49 Speaker 29: say that if that system ever

01:21:51 Speaker 29: fails, then then they'll be on

01:21:52 Speaker 29: the hook for it. And and

01:21:54 Speaker 29: so you can imagine from a

01:21:56 Speaker 29: municipal risk and liability perspective, they

01:21:59 Speaker 29: don't want to see these systems

01:22:01 Speaker 29: built in a half hazard or

01:22:03 Speaker 29: or lower standard fashion. So you

01:22:07 Speaker 29: know a lot of times the

01:22:10 Speaker 29: municipality will say, yeah, we're fine

01:22:12 Speaker 29: with a communal system as long

01:22:14 Speaker 29: as you build it to a

01:22:16 Speaker 29: municipal standard, and the developer will

01:22:18 Speaker 29: say, there's no way I could

01:22:21 Speaker 29: have. Will say there's no way

01:22:23 Speaker 29: I could ever afford to build

01:22:25 Speaker 29: it to a municipal standard, so

01:22:28 Speaker 29: it simply never gets built or

01:22:31 Speaker 29: or done. So the province is

01:22:33 Speaker 29: looking at streamlined processes for both

01:22:34 Speaker 29: municipal and provincial approvals on those

01:22:35 Speaker 29: communal systems, and this would be

01:22:37 Speaker 29: particularly to unlock development in some

01:22:40 Speaker 29: of our smaller villages and and

01:22:42 Speaker 29: hamlets and rural areas, whereby you

01:22:44 Speaker 29: you wouldn't necessarily have a municipal

01:22:47 Speaker 29: water and wastewater treatment system. This

01:22:48 Speaker 29: isn't meant to replace those those

01:22:49 Speaker 29: treatment systems. It's meant to acknowledge

01:22:50 Speaker 29: the fact that the the financial

01:22:57 Speaker 29: out The financial output to install

01:22:58 Speaker 29: one of those treatment systems is

01:23:00 Speaker 29: is a is a barrier for

01:23:02 Speaker 32: some smaller communities in that regard.

01:23:03 Speaker 32: Similar to our discussion a few

01:23:06 Speaker 32: minutes ago, there's also further changes

01:23:07 Speaker 32: proposed to the development charges that

01:23:09 Speaker 32: would further limit the ability to

01:23:10 Speaker 32: include land costs as part of

01:23:12 Speaker 32: the the collectible development charge. They

01:23:13 Speaker 32: would standardize who pays what in

01:23:17 Speaker 32: terms of infrastructure, and and there's

01:23:18 Speaker 32: further transparency and reporting requirements, including

01:23:20 Speaker 32: the need to share a background

01:23:22 Speaker 32: study where requested by the Ground

01:23:23 Speaker 32: study, we're requested by the ministry,

01:23:24 Speaker 32: and finally, I promise is my

01:23:25 Speaker 32: last point. They're also consulting on

01:23:26 Speaker 32: on the impact of enhanced lot

01:23:28 Speaker 32: level requirements to improve sustainability. And

01:23:29 Speaker 32: essentially, what that means is is

01:23:31 Speaker 32: they want to look at those

01:23:32 Speaker 32: municipal requirements that they believe are

01:23:34 Speaker 32: driving up the cost of housing

01:23:36 Speaker 32: and being applied sporadically across the

01:23:38 Speaker 32: province. And and so, what are

01:23:40 Speaker 32: those areas where we can we

01:23:41 Speaker 32: can all agree that that maybe

01:23:42 Speaker 32: some tools are needed. versus what

01:23:44 Speaker 32: are those other areas whereby maybe

01:23:46 Speaker 32: similar to the city of Toronto's

01:23:47 Speaker 32: green roof programme, it becomes optional

01:23:49 Speaker 32: in that regard. And certainly, again,

01:23:51 Speaker 32: as the county, we want to

01:23:54 Speaker 32: work with the province in this

01:23:56 Speaker 32: regard. Some of what they've thrown

01:23:58 Speaker 32: out in the environmental registry posting

01:24:01 Speaker 32: is is definitely concerning to staff

01:24:02 Speaker 32: in that regard. They've talked about

01:24:04 Speaker 32: things like bicycle parking or requiring

01:24:05 Speaker 32: native planting. To staff, that's not

01:24:08 Speaker 32: something that necessarily adds a tremendous

01:24:10 Speaker 32: amount. to a developer's performance in

01:24:13 Speaker 32: that regard, but it's it's it's

01:24:16 Speaker 32: things that we've had enshrined in

01:24:18 Speaker 32: in both zoning bylaws in the

01:24:20 Speaker 32: case of bicycle parking and and

01:24:23 Speaker 32: native planting requirements in our subdivision

01:24:24 Speaker 32: and site plan agreements for for

01:24:26 Speaker 32: many many years now, and and

01:24:28 Speaker 32: it's it's not a tool that

01:24:29 Speaker 32: we'd we'd like to lose in

01:24:32 Speaker 32: that regard. So again, you know,

01:24:34 Speaker 32: I think there's room for some

01:24:35 Speaker 32: scoping here, but from a staff

01:24:39 Speaker 32: perspective, and particularly in terms of

01:24:40 Speaker 32: looking at our longer-term sustainable. future

01:24:42 Speaker 32: in that regard, some of these

01:24:43 Speaker 32: tools are very useful without without

01:24:44 Speaker 32: you know unduly harming development in

01:24:47 Speaker 32: that regard. So with that, I

01:24:49 Speaker 32: will turn it over to

01:24:51 Speaker 32: Niall, who's going to speak to

01:24:53 Speaker 32: some of the transportation elements. Thank

01:24:55 Speaker 32: you very much, and to you,

01:24:58 Speaker 32: Deputy Warden. I told myself I

01:24:59 Speaker 32: should never follow Scott when it

01:25:01 Speaker 32: comes to doing a presentation. I

01:25:03 Speaker 32: will be this relatively relatively brief

01:25:05 Speaker 32: as we go over the next

01:25:07 Speaker 32: few slides. Pat, I. know was

01:25:10 Speaker 32: desperately keen to be here today,

01:25:12 Speaker 32: but was unfortunately unable to attend.

01:25:14 Speaker 32: So I, you have me instead.

01:25:16 Speaker 32: So I'm backup, Pat. Transportation is

01:25:18 Speaker 32: one of the pieces that's bubbled

01:25:20 Speaker 32: up through through Bill 60, and

01:25:21 Speaker 32: I think the story for a

01:25:22 Speaker 32: lot of the transportation elements in

01:25:24 Speaker 32: there is we don't really understand

01:25:25 Speaker 32: the problem that the province is

01:25:27 Speaker 32: trying to fix for some of

01:25:30 Speaker 32: these. I think it'll be clear

01:25:32 Speaker 32: on the third one of these

01:25:33 Speaker 32: slides that we we know where

01:25:34 Speaker 32: the problem is, but certainly for

01:25:35 Speaker 32: some of these, we're not entirely

01:25:38 Speaker 32: sure the the rationale behind why

01:25:40 Speaker 32: the province is seeking. Mind why

01:25:41 Speaker 32: the province is seeking to move

01:25:43 Speaker 32: some of these forward, and so

01:25:44 Speaker 32: we don't have much detail around

01:25:46 Speaker 32: what the potential outcome of some

01:25:48 Speaker 32: of these changes could be, or

01:25:51 Speaker 32: as I say, the reasons perhaps

01:25:53 Speaker 32: that they're driving at some of

01:25:55 Speaker 32: these things. So the first one

01:25:57 Speaker 32: that's in Bill 60 is harmonisation

01:25:59 Speaker 32: of road standards. This is an

01:26:00 Speaker 32: interesting one because we already have

01:26:01 Speaker 32: technical guidelines which are well adopted

01:26:02 Speaker 32: and have an extensive history across

01:26:04 Speaker 32: the province in terms of how

01:26:06 Speaker 32: roads are constructed. They're used by

01:26:07 Speaker 32: the counties' teams. They're used by

01:26:09 Speaker 32: municipal teams. across Grey County, and

01:26:15 Speaker 32: they they are the OPSS and

01:26:16 Speaker 32: the the OPSD standards, which are

01:26:18 Speaker 32: already used when we're creating road

01:26:21 Speaker 32: standards for for consultants and contractors

01:26:23 Speaker 32: to be doing. So they're they're

01:26:25 Speaker 32: commonly adopted standards across the engineering

01:26:28 Speaker 32: profession that are already in place,

01:26:29 Speaker 32: and so we're not entirely sure

01:26:30 Speaker 32: what the harmonisation beyond those

01:26:32 Speaker 32: might be. It might be focusing

01:26:35 Speaker 32: on those standards, it might be

01:26:37 Speaker 32: introducing new standards or refining the

01:26:38 Speaker 32: scope of those standards and bringing

01:26:40 Speaker 32: them in. Standards and bringing them

01:26:42 Speaker 32: into a provincial legislative context, we

01:26:45 Speaker 32: would suggest some caution needs to

01:26:47 Speaker 32: be applied to this. We like

01:26:48 Speaker 32: the flexibility to build roads as

01:26:51 Speaker 32: roads need to be built for

01:26:53 Speaker 32: the positions that they're in, and

01:26:56 Speaker 32: those conditions obviously vary widely across

01:26:57 Speaker 32: Great County, across our member municipalities.

01:26:58 Speaker 32: More significantly, they vary very significantly

01:27:01 Speaker 32: across the province of Ontario, and

01:27:02 Speaker 32: so it's difficult to difficult to

01:27:03 Speaker 32: understand what harmonisation of a road

01:27:05 Speaker 32: standard could be that is applicable

01:27:07 Speaker 32: to the far north as it

01:27:08 Speaker 32: is to. urban Toronto, and so

01:27:10 Speaker 32: some concern around what harmonisation could

01:27:12 Speaker 32: look like in that side of

01:27:13 Speaker 32: things. We already use a number

01:27:16 Speaker 32: of different standards to adopt to

01:27:17 Speaker 32: the drainage conditions, the soil conditions,

01:27:19 Speaker 32: the ground conditions of the various

01:27:20 Speaker 32: different roads that we look after,

01:27:23 Speaker 32: and so if that's something that

01:27:27 Speaker 32: we're looking after in a scale

01:27:29 Speaker 32: of a county, again, looking at

01:27:33 Speaker 32: what that would look like over

01:27:35 Speaker 32: a much broader area is something

01:27:37 Speaker 32: which would take some significant attention

01:27:40 Speaker 32: to, and also the. ability of

01:27:42 Speaker 32: contractors to be able to respond

01:27:43 Speaker 32: to this. So we work with

01:27:46 Speaker 32: a number of contractors who use

01:27:47 Speaker 32: a number of different asphalt plants.

01:27:49 Speaker 32: We specify the mixes that we

01:27:50 Speaker 32: require to meet our local conditions.

01:27:52 Speaker 32: And again, if this is harmonised

01:27:54 Speaker 32: across the province, what does that

01:27:56 Speaker 32: do from a contractor's perspective in

01:27:57 Speaker 32: regards to materials that we have?

01:27:59 Speaker 32: We have access to. The early

01:28:00 Speaker 32: indications on the harmonisation suggest that

01:28:02 Speaker 32: there are some savings that could

01:28:02 Speaker 32: be leveraged through this. We're not

01:28:04 Speaker 32: able to see where those savings

01:28:05 Speaker 32: potentially could be gained. at this

01:28:07 Speaker 32: point in time, and so really

01:28:08 Speaker 32: this is a bit of a

01:28:12 Speaker 32: story of we really do need

01:28:15 Speaker 32: a lot more information before we

01:28:17 Speaker 32: can come to a position of

01:28:20 Speaker 32: whether or not harmonisation is something

01:28:22 Speaker 32: which should be welcomed or or

01:28:24 Speaker 32: express some concern about. There are

01:28:26 Speaker 32: a couple of things that give

01:28:28 Speaker 32: us some cause for concern, specifically

01:28:29 Speaker 32: in regards to ministers being able

01:28:31 Speaker 32: to make regulations regarding municipalities and

01:28:32 Speaker 32: the contracts that we enter into

01:28:33 Speaker 32: and standardising some of those. This.

01:28:35 Speaker 32: this does appear to be an

01:28:36 Speaker 32: extra layer. We have a well-developed

01:28:38 Speaker 32: procurement process at Great County. Our

01:28:40 Speaker 32: member municipalities have their own procurement

01:28:42 Speaker 32: processes that we have in place.

01:28:45 Speaker 32: We have contractors that we've had

01:28:46 Speaker 32: relationships with over many years, and

01:28:47 Speaker 32: we welcome new contractors through through

01:28:49 Speaker 32: procurement process each year. This appears

01:28:51 Speaker 32: to be an extra layer that

01:28:55 Speaker 32: we don't understand the necessity for

01:28:58 Speaker 32: with the with the the procurement

01:29:00 Speaker 32: processes that we have in place

01:29:01 Speaker 32: at this time, and and the

01:29:03 Speaker 32: contracts that we're able to form

01:29:05 Speaker 32: in. Contracts that we're able to

01:29:06 Speaker 32: form into. Now, this appears to

01:29:08 Speaker 32: be something that wouldn't have any

01:29:10 Speaker 32: merit for us at the way

01:29:11 Speaker 32: we operate at this point in

01:29:13 Speaker 32: time. So, again, not quite sure

01:29:14 Speaker 32: why this is coming forward. Not

01:29:17 Speaker 32: quite sure what the value would

01:29:18 Speaker 32: be in terms of grey counting.

01:29:20 Speaker 32: I think we probably can guess

01:29:21 Speaker 32: where this one is coming from

01:29:22 Speaker 32: in terms of a provincial lens.

01:29:24 Speaker 32: Not something which has a massive

01:29:27 Speaker 32: impact on us on the surface

01:29:39 Speaker 33: in regards to the way in

01:29:40 Speaker 33: which we design our roads and

01:29:41 Speaker 34: the the requirement to not.

01:29:43 Speaker 35: eliminate travel lanes for traffic, to

01:29:45 Speaker 35: make active transportation lanes for cycling

01:29:46 Speaker 35: infrastructure. However, the the guidelines that

01:29:47 Speaker 35: we operate under allow for us

01:29:50 Speaker 35: to look at road design on

01:29:52 Speaker 35: an as needed basis. And so,

01:29:54 Speaker 35: the the inference of this this

01:29:56 Speaker 35: sort of regulation within Bill sixty,

01:29:58 Speaker 35: this this element of Bill sixty

01:30:00 Speaker 35: would be to limit or restrict

01:30:01 Speaker 35: the ability of the municipality to

01:30:04 Speaker 35: design a road as it's needed

01:30:07 Speaker 35: for the area it is in.

01:30:10 Speaker 35: And so, at times. as you'll

01:30:12 Speaker 35: see on the slide, putting a

01:30:14 Speaker 35: road on a diet is a

01:30:15 Speaker 35: good thing to do. The use

01:30:17 Speaker 35: of that road may have changed.

01:30:19 Speaker 35: The desire for the need of

01:30:21 Speaker 35: the use of that road may

01:30:23 Speaker 35: have changed over times. It may

01:30:25 Speaker 35: not be that we specifically wish

01:30:28 Speaker 35: to introduce a cycling rain lane,

01:30:29 Speaker 35: but it might be that there's

01:30:32 Speaker 35: more space required for active active

01:30:34 Speaker 35: transportation infrastructure to support pedestrians. It

01:30:36 Speaker 35: might be that we're looking to

01:30:37 Speaker 35: amend turning lanes, reduce or increase

01:30:40 Speaker 35: road lane widths, and so the.

01:30:43 Speaker 35: scope of this legislative change that's

01:30:45 Speaker 35: being proposed in in Bill 60,

01:30:47 Speaker 35: if it's defined very much to

01:30:51 Speaker 35: just cycling infrastructure, might not be

01:30:54 Speaker 35: something that has a big impact.

01:30:55 Speaker 35: But there is some concern that

01:30:57 Speaker 35: the way in which this is

01:31:00 Speaker 35: worded would restrict the ability of

01:31:05 Speaker 35: a municipality to be able to

01:31:06 Speaker 35: design a road for the best

01:31:08 Speaker 35: situation, the best design for the

01:31:11 Speaker 35: circumstances and situation that we we

01:31:11 Speaker 35: have the road in. And that

01:31:13 Speaker 35: takes me to the last slide,

01:31:16 Speaker 35: where we can offer a little

01:31:18 Speaker 35: bit of a glimpse into some

01:31:21 Speaker 35: good news stuff. So the the

01:31:23 Speaker 35: ability to reduce some of the

01:31:24 Speaker 35: waste times regarding working eligibility criteria

01:31:25 Speaker 35: is something that we we generally

01:31:27 Speaker 35: support. It's not specific to transportation,

01:31:28 Speaker 35: but it is something which across

01:31:30 Speaker 35: the board would be something that

01:31:32 Speaker 35: would be generally supported. And and

01:31:34 Speaker 35: looking at the LEAN Act is

01:31:36 Speaker 35: something that we're we're always interested

01:31:38 Speaker 35: in. However, we would we would

01:31:40 Speaker 35: caveat this with we don't want

01:31:41 Speaker 35: more paperwork on terms of this

01:31:43 Speaker 35: one. This one works reasonably well

01:31:45 Speaker 35: as is, and so so again

01:31:47 Speaker 35: no need for more paperwork when

01:31:49 Speaker 35: it comes to the LEANS. More

01:31:51 Speaker 35: paperwork when it comes to the

01:31:54 Speaker 35: leaves, and I will wrap up

01:31:55 Speaker 35: at that. And hopefully, there will

01:31:57 Speaker 35: be no questions. If there are,

01:31:58 Speaker 35: Mister Taylor would be happy to

01:31:59 Speaker 35: take them. Thank you, Scott and

01:32:01 Speaker 35: Nile. Sherry, thank you. I wanted

01:32:02 Speaker 35: to start with just a little

01:32:03 Speaker 35: bit of background information on the

01:32:05 Speaker 35: landlord-tenant board and the Residential Tenancies

01:32:08 Speaker 35: Act. For those of you who

01:32:09 Speaker 35: don't live and breathe the legislation

01:32:12 Speaker 35: like we do. in housing, the

01:32:13 Speaker 35: landlord-tenant board is one of thirteen

01:32:16 Speaker 35: Ontario adjudicative tribunals. It is the

01:32:18 Speaker 35: busiest of all of the tribunals

01:32:20 Speaker 35: in Ontario, and it is acting

01:32:22 Speaker 35: on the authority under the Residential

01:32:24 Speaker 35: Tenancies Act. And that is the

01:32:25 Speaker 35: piece of legislation that makes the

01:32:27 Speaker 35: framework of relationships between landlords and

01:32:28 Speaker 35: tenants. They receive approximately, on average,

01:32:30 Speaker 35: eighty-one thousand applications in a calendar

01:32:32 Speaker 35: year, which means that they would

01:32:34 Speaker 35: have to hear three hundred tribunals

01:32:36 Speaker 35: a day in. order to be

01:32:39 Speaker 35: able to keep up with the

01:32:41 Speaker 35: the amount of tribunals that they

01:32:43 Speaker 35: have. Approximately twenty percent of those

01:32:44 Speaker 35: tribunals are withdrawn ahead of time.

01:32:46 Speaker 35: Eleven percent are mediated, and the

01:32:47 Speaker 35: rest go in front of an

01:32:50 Speaker 35: adjudicator. The adjudicator is a role

01:32:52 Speaker 35: in Ontario that is allowed and

01:32:54 Speaker 35: under the authority of the Residential

01:32:55 Speaker 35: Tenancies Act to be the only

01:32:57 Speaker 35: person to legally terminate a tenancy

01:32:58 Speaker 35: in Ontario and issue an order

01:33:01 Speaker 35: of eviction. The sheriff position is.

01:33:03 Speaker 35: the only position in Ontario that

01:33:05 Speaker 35: can execute that order. So, Bill

01:33:06 Speaker 35: sixty has proposed a few changes

01:33:07 Speaker 35: legislatively in order to try and

01:33:10 Speaker 35: help the landlord and tenant board

01:33:12 Speaker 35: to catch up on their their

01:33:14 Speaker 35: backlog, as well as incentivize incentivize

01:33:17 Speaker 35: would be landlords who are sitting

01:33:18 Speaker 35: on vacant properties to try and

01:33:21 Speaker 35: have confidence in the system and

01:33:24 Speaker 35: rent out those properties. We agree

01:33:27 Speaker 35: with some of the things that

01:33:29 Speaker 35: they've put forward. we are very

01:33:30 Speaker 35: concerned about others, and so we

01:33:32 Speaker 35: are looking at this from a

01:33:33 Speaker 35: very balanced perspective. So the first

01:33:34 Speaker 35: change that they're proposing is to

01:33:35 Speaker 35: reduce the amount of time that

01:33:37 Speaker 35: parties have to request a review

01:33:38 Speaker 35: of an order to the landlord-tenant

01:33:40 Speaker 35: board from thirty to fifty day

01:33:43 Speaker 35: or fifteen days. So what that

01:33:44 Speaker 35: is is if there is a

01:33:46 Speaker 35: critical error to your order. So

01:33:47 Speaker 35: for example, a landlord receives an

01:33:49 Speaker 35: order for eviction, but they whoever

01:33:50 Speaker 35: typed it out put the wrong

01:33:52 Speaker 35: unit number, and they don't. appeal

01:33:53 Speaker 35: that within 15 days, they could

01:33:56 Speaker 35: face starting over at the at

01:33:58 Speaker 35: the beginning. If a tenant receives

01:34:00 Speaker 35: a notice of eviction for rental

01:34:02 Speaker 35: arrears, and the math is incorrect,

01:34:04 Speaker 35: again, if they don't catch it

01:34:07 Speaker 35: within the 15 days, it could

01:34:08 Speaker 35: end up going to an appeal

01:34:09 Speaker 35: process. So on paper, it does

01:34:10 Speaker 35: look as though this may shorten

01:34:12 Speaker 35: time, but what it will really

01:34:13 Speaker 35: do is open the door to

01:34:15 Speaker 35: more appeals and more landlords having

01:34:17 Speaker 35: to start from scratch, limiting new

01:34:21 Speaker 35: issues that can be raised at

01:34:22 Speaker 35: the time of a landlord-tenant. board

01:34:25 Speaker 35: hearing, that is something that is

01:34:27 Speaker 35: allowed to happen for evictions that

01:34:30 Speaker 35: are happening for non-payment of rent.

01:34:32 Speaker 35: And what the province is saying

01:34:33 Speaker 35: is that they will allow tenants

01:34:37 Speaker 35: to bring forward any of their

01:34:40 Speaker 35: maintenance concerns if the tenant pays

01:34:43 Speaker 35: 50% of the rental arrears up

01:34:46 Speaker 35: front. And what that's going to

01:34:47 Speaker 35: do is it's going to create

01:34:49 Speaker 35: a two-tier system between the haves

01:34:51 Speaker 35: and the have-nots. It'll put additional

01:34:55 Speaker 35: strain on some of our most

01:34:57 Speaker 35: vulnerable populations. What it is intended

01:34:59 Speaker 35: to do is. equalize the playing

01:35:00 Speaker 35: field. So right now, as a

01:35:01 Speaker 35: landlord, if we go to tribunal,

01:35:03 Speaker 35: which is what we are as

01:35:04 Speaker 35: as Gray County Housing, we follow

01:35:07 Speaker 35: the same rules and legislations as

01:35:10 Speaker 35: any other landlord. A tenant can

01:35:11 Speaker 35: bring forward maintenance concerns without any

01:35:12 Speaker 35: advance notice to us, and then

01:35:17 Speaker 35: we don't have time to prepare

01:35:20 Speaker 35: a defence, and so we ask

01:35:23 Speaker 35: for an adjournment, which causes delays.

01:35:25 Speaker 35: When you are going to tribunal

01:35:27 Speaker 35: for a behavioural issue, all parties

01:35:30 Speaker 35: are expected to prepare their evidence

01:35:32 Speaker 35: and bring forward what it is

01:35:33 Speaker 35: that they're going. to discuss seven

01:35:34 Speaker 35: days in advance. So we would

01:35:35 Speaker 35: propose that that same rule would

01:35:37 Speaker 35: apply to non-payment of rent hearings

01:35:40 Speaker 35: to equalize the playing field and

01:35:43 Speaker 35: ensure that everybody has an opportunity

01:35:45 Speaker 35: to bring forward their concerns. Shortening

01:35:48 Speaker 35: the rental arrears eviction notice from

01:35:49 Speaker 35: fourteen to seven days again looks

01:35:51 Speaker 35: good on paper, but won't make

01:35:52 Speaker 35: a hair of difference if the

01:35:54 Speaker 35: procedural issues that are happening at

01:35:56 Speaker 35: the landlord-tenant board are not corrected,

01:35:57 Speaker 35: and if we go to get

01:35:59 Speaker 35: a sheriff and we don't have

01:36:00 Speaker 35: one, which has happened a number

01:36:02 Speaker 35: of times in the last three

01:36:03 Speaker 35: years in Gray County. We've had

01:36:06 Speaker 35: sheriffs that are go off for

01:36:07 Speaker 35: various reasons, and then we have

01:36:09 Speaker 35: to borrow from other regions, which

01:36:09 Speaker 35: means our sheriff is only available

01:36:15 Speaker 35: to us maybe once or twice

01:36:19 Speaker 35: a month. So again, you could

01:36:21 Speaker 35: have an order in hand, but

01:36:23 Speaker 35: then not be able to execute

01:36:24 Speaker 35: it. Creating authority to set out

01:36:26 Speaker 35: circumstances or conditions for a set

01:36:28 Speaker 35: aside. So a set aside is

01:36:31 Speaker 35: essentially a request for a second

01:36:35 Speaker 35: hearing, and we agree. that sometimes

01:36:36 Speaker 35: this gets abused. Sometimes tenants will

01:36:39 Speaker 35: say that they didn't know that

01:36:41 Speaker 35: there was a hearing, and so

01:36:44 Speaker 35: they will request a second one,

01:36:45 Speaker 35: and it will be granted. And

01:36:47 Speaker 35: we agree that there needs to

01:36:49 Speaker 35: be more transparency and more consistency

01:36:52 Speaker 35: as to when those are are

01:36:54 Speaker 35: implemented, because right now there's no

01:36:55 Speaker 35: real rhyme or reason from our

01:36:58 Speaker 35: perspective as to why one adjudicator

01:37:00 Speaker 35: will say yes and another adjudicator

01:37:01 Speaker 35: will say no. We also think

01:37:03 Speaker 35: though that before this would be

01:37:04 Speaker 35: implemented. It needs to be done

01:37:05 Speaker 35: with deep collabouration with landlord landlord

01:37:06 Speaker 35: groups, tenant groups, and municipalities. Because

01:37:08 Speaker 35: if any of this legislation fails,

01:37:09 Speaker 35: sitting next to Josh, I will

01:37:10 Speaker 35: hear all about how the sustainable

01:37:12 Speaker 35: housing benefit and the short-term shelter

01:37:14 Speaker 35: programme has to pick up where

01:37:16 Speaker 35: this leaves us. Increasing enforcement resources,

01:37:19 Speaker 35: we are absolutely for this. That

01:37:22 Speaker 35: would mean hiring more sheriffs, and

01:37:25 Speaker 35: we will advocate that Gray County

01:37:27 Speaker 35: will be one. of the ones

01:37:30 Speaker 35: to get a sheriff, and advocating

01:37:33 Speaker 35: that these will be permanent positions

01:37:35 Speaker 35: and not temporary ones. Increasing access

01:37:37 Speaker 35: to decisions or orders. I must

01:37:40 Speaker 35: say I'm a little bit confused

01:37:42 Speaker 35: by this one because you already

01:37:43 Speaker 35: can access orders, landlords, anybody. They're

01:37:45 Speaker 35: they're public information. Anyone can attend

01:37:46 Speaker 35: a tribunal. In fact, any landlord

01:37:47 Speaker 35: should in order to learn the

01:37:49 Speaker 35: nuances of being in a tribunal,

01:37:51 Speaker 35: and anyone can Google and. search

01:37:54 Speaker 35: up orders? They're they're public knowledge,

01:37:55 Speaker 35: so I'm not really sure what

01:37:59 Speaker 35: that is, other than making the

01:38:02 Speaker 35: public aware that they can do

01:38:03 Speaker 35: something that's already available to them.

01:38:04 Speaker 35: Simplified language in the LTV documents.

01:38:06 Speaker 35: We agree that they do need

01:38:11 Speaker 35: to be simplified. However, the landlord-tenant

01:38:13 Speaker 35: board also just revamped their website

01:38:15 Speaker 35: and made it much more confusing.

01:38:19 Speaker 35: So we're not really sure how

01:38:20 Speaker 35: well of a job they're going

01:38:21 Speaker 35: to do with their forms. The

01:38:26 Speaker 35: forms do cause a lot of

01:38:29 Speaker 35: confusion as they are right now,

01:38:30 Speaker 35: and in both. Right now, and

01:38:32 Speaker 35: in big bold letters across the

01:38:33 Speaker 35: front of the page, there's a

01:38:36 Speaker 35: statement that says something along the

01:38:37 Speaker 35: lines of this form could lead

01:38:39 Speaker 35: you to eviction, and nobody ever

01:38:41 Speaker 35: reads the second page with the

01:38:44 Speaker 35: fine print as to what they

01:38:46 Speaker 35: need to do next. And I

01:38:49 Speaker 35: cannot change the slide. You able

01:38:52 Speaker 35: to change slide? There we

01:38:56 Speaker 35: go. So they want to create

01:38:58 Speaker 35: authority to consider factors and limits

01:38:59 Speaker 35: under which an adjudicator can consider

01:39:02 Speaker 35: postponing an eviction. This. Funding and

01:39:05 Speaker 35: eviction. This usually is a human

01:39:07 Speaker 35: rights matter. Part of the legislation

01:39:09 Speaker 35: that is impacting landlords at the

01:39:12 Speaker 35: LTB is lack of knowledge of

01:39:14 Speaker 35: human rights legislation. We are expected

01:39:16 Speaker 35: to know and understand our responsibilities

01:39:17 Speaker 35: under the Human Rights Act as

01:39:20 Speaker 35: well. And so, what this would

01:39:22 Speaker 35: do is, we do agree again

01:39:25 Speaker 35: that there's inconsistency. It seems that

01:39:27 Speaker 35: the adjudicator you get will determine

01:39:32 Speaker 35: what they will take into consideration

01:39:33 Speaker 35: and what they won't. So these

01:39:34 Speaker 35: are usually compassionate reasons. So this

01:39:37 Speaker 35: is where a landlord gets the

01:39:39 Speaker 35: eviction, but they won't tell the

01:39:42 Speaker 35: person they have to be out

01:39:44 Speaker 35: within days. They'll tell the person

01:39:48 Speaker 36: they have to be out within

01:39:52 Speaker 36: maybe two or three months, and

01:39:55 Speaker 36: it could be because of illness.

01:39:57 Speaker 36: It could be because of kids

01:40:00 Speaker 36: wrapping up school. It could be

01:40:02 Speaker 36: because of a number of

01:40:04 Speaker 36: of different compassionate type reasons. So

01:40:08 Speaker 36: we agree there needs to be

01:40:09 Speaker 36: clarity and consistency, but again with

01:40:18 Speaker 36: some really deep consultation with municipalities

01:40:19 Speaker 36: and landlord and tenant groups. They

01:40:21 Speaker 36: are. looking at removing compensation requirements

01:40:24 Speaker 36: for landlords' own use evictions, and

01:40:28 Speaker 36: no longer needed where the landlord

01:40:30 Speaker 32: gives 120 days' notice. We are

01:40:32 Speaker 32: against this. This doesn't affect us

01:40:33 Speaker 32: as Gray County Housing. However, when

01:40:34 Speaker 32: a tenant is evicted for own

01:40:35 Speaker 32: use, they're being evicted for no

01:40:36 Speaker 32: fault of their own. They're often

01:40:39 Speaker 32: having to move into housing that

01:40:40 Speaker 32: is more expensive than the housing

01:40:42 Speaker 32: that they're leaving, and they have

01:40:44 Speaker 32: to incur cost of moving. So

01:40:44 Speaker 32: we think it's only fair. that

01:40:47 Speaker 32: they receive some sort of restitution

01:40:50 Speaker 32: to help them with that process.

01:40:53 Speaker 32: And consulting on alternative options for

01:40:55 Speaker 37: when lease agreements expire, the government

01:40:57 Speaker 37: has since noted that they will

01:41:00 Speaker 37: not be pursuing this, and we're

01:41:03 Speaker 37: in support of that. So tribunals

01:41:06 Speaker 37: are equipped and expected to make

01:41:07 Speaker 37: decisions that have real impact in

01:41:09 Speaker 37: people's lives, and we agree and

01:41:11 Speaker 37: advocate that those those decisions should

01:41:14 Speaker 37: be fair, and they should be

01:41:16 Speaker 37: trans. Fair and they should be

01:41:20 Speaker 37: transparent and they should be consistent.

01:41:23 Speaker 37: And the the ombudsman's office did

01:41:26 Speaker 37: a report. I'm not sure how

01:41:29 Speaker 37: many of you are aware of

01:41:32 Speaker 37: that, but in 2018 was when

01:41:36 Speaker 37: the issues with the LTV began.

01:41:38 Speaker 37: And it in 2018 there was

01:41:42 Speaker 37: a large number of complaints that

01:41:45 Speaker 37: went to the ombudsman's office. In

01:41:46 Speaker 37: the beginning of 2019, right before

01:41:48 Speaker 37: COVID, they launched an investigation. Then

01:41:53 Speaker 37: there were two rental moratoriums during

01:41:54 Speaker 37: COVID, which exacerbated the issues. The

01:41:59 Speaker 37: ombudsman's office has put forward 61

01:42:01 Speaker 37: recommendations, procedural recommendations, to clean up

01:42:03 Speaker 37: the consistencies or lack thereof within

01:42:05 Speaker 35: the board and the decisions that

01:42:07 Speaker 35: they make. And the LTB has

01:42:10 Speaker 35: to respond to the ombudsman's office

01:42:12 Speaker 35: every six months with updates as

01:42:14 Speaker 35: to how they're doing. We are

01:42:16 Speaker 35: in support of chasing that process.

01:42:19 Speaker 35: As when you read the report,

01:42:21 Speaker 35: you can see that a lot

01:42:23 Speaker 35: of the recommendations that are made.

01:42:26 Speaker 35: are direct reflections of the experiences

01:42:27 Speaker 35: we're having. I'd be happy to

01:42:29 Speaker 35: take any questions. Thank you, Sharon.

01:42:31 Speaker 35: Are there any questions from Council?

01:42:32 Speaker 35: Councillor Gray. Two questions. Ms. Irwin

01:42:35 Speaker 35: did a great job, but my

01:42:36 Speaker 35: first question is going to circle

01:42:38 Speaker 35: back to Nile. I did have

01:42:40 Speaker 35: one question, and then a follow-up

01:42:42 Speaker 35: for Sharon. A couple years ago,

01:42:45 Speaker 35: I believe it was Sudbury was.

01:42:47 Speaker 35: named under joint and several liability

01:42:48 Speaker 35: as part of construction project accident

01:42:50 Speaker 35: on site, and this caused municipalities

01:42:52 Speaker 35: a tremendous amount of grief. Within

01:42:56 Speaker 35: the changes proposed in the Highway

01:42:58 Speaker 35: Traffic Act component, is there any

01:43:00 Speaker 35: recognition to supporting municipalities' positions, which

01:43:03 Speaker 35: were an outcome of that and

01:43:04 Speaker 36: the extra responsibilities and costs that

01:43:06 Speaker 36: were sustained? Can I get back

01:43:08 Speaker 36: to you on that one, so

01:43:10 Speaker 36: you, Deputy Warden? I am aware

01:43:13 Speaker 36: of the aware of the situation

01:43:14 Speaker 36: in Sudbury. I had I had

01:43:15 Speaker 36: a recollection that had been dealt

01:43:17 Speaker 36: with in another piece of legislation

01:43:19 Speaker 36: that had happened, but I need

01:43:23 Speaker 36: I would need to circle back

01:43:24 Speaker 36: with Eagle to get an answer

01:43:26 Speaker 36: to you. I will get back

01:43:29 Speaker 36: to you. Okay, thank you, Neil.

01:43:30 Speaker 36: Did you have another question? Go

01:43:33 Speaker 35: ahead. Thank you, and the. slide

01:43:35 Speaker 35: has went past me. It could

01:43:36 Speaker 35: have been the second last slide

01:43:38 Speaker 35: or the the last slide. The

01:43:40 Speaker 35: 120 days notice for own use.

01:43:41 Speaker 35: Sharon, you mentioned it doesn't really

01:43:45 Speaker 35: apply. I think to the county

01:43:49 Speaker 35: was your comment. But we were

01:43:51 Speaker 35: going to submit comments opposed to

01:43:53 Speaker 35: that. And I'm question further why

01:43:55 Speaker 35: we would submit comments opposed to

01:43:57 Speaker 35: that. I think of a an

01:43:59 Speaker 35: individual, a family who might have

01:44:01 Speaker 35: a semi-detached. They're renting out. the

01:44:05 Speaker 35: other unit in their semi-detached, and

01:44:08 Speaker 38: a family member loses a job.

01:44:11 Speaker 38: They own the building. They should

01:44:13 Speaker 38: have some significant rights about who's

01:44:15 Speaker 38: going to occupy that building. And

01:44:19 Speaker 38: I'm I'm wondering what is it

01:44:21 Speaker 38: further here that the county should

01:44:24 Speaker 38: be positioning as communication to further

01:44:27 Speaker 38: support that individual because I I

01:44:28 Speaker 38: know where that any monetary. But

01:44:31 Speaker 38: any monetary remuneration, I know where

01:44:35 Speaker 38: it's coming from. It's coming from

01:44:36 Speaker 38: the person who owns that building,

01:44:39 Speaker 38: that duplex. What are we looking

01:44:41 Speaker 38: for further here? That when we're

01:44:43 Speaker 29: not actually players in the game.

01:44:45 Speaker 29: And so, through you, chair, we're

01:44:47 Speaker 29: looking at it because we sit

01:44:50 Speaker 29: on sort of a threshold of

01:44:53 Speaker 29: both the landlord for Gray County

01:44:55 Speaker 29: Community Housing. We also operate. programmemes

01:44:56 Speaker 29: such as the Sustainable Housing Benefit,

01:44:57 Speaker 29: which will have a trickle-down effect

01:45:01 Speaker 29: on those types of programmemes for

01:45:03 Speaker 29: moving costs and last month's rent.

01:45:05 Speaker 29: So we're looking at it as

01:45:09 Speaker 29: as a full picture of protecting

01:45:11 Speaker 29: the tenants from having to come

01:45:15 Speaker 29: and access resources when it is

01:45:18 Speaker 29: of no fault of their own

01:45:21 Speaker 29: that they're being evicted. Not to

01:45:23 Speaker 29: say that I disagree with you.

01:45:25 Speaker 29: Absolutely, if a person owns a

01:45:27 Speaker 29: property and and they're entitled to

01:45:30 Speaker 29: move into it and have that

01:45:33 Speaker 29: eviction 100. That eviction, one hundred

01:45:34 Speaker 29: percent. Our argument is that to

01:45:36 Speaker 29: protect additional resources having to

01:45:42 Speaker 29: pick up the slack, because it

01:45:44 Speaker 29: is a no fault eviction, and

01:45:48 Speaker 29: because it will incur costs on

01:45:49 Speaker 39: the person who's having to move,

01:45:52 Speaker 39: we feel that it should be

01:45:55 Speaker 39: there should still be a monetary

01:45:56 Speaker 39: tie. So, can we construct a

01:45:59 Speaker 39: correlation to increasing supply in the

01:46:02 Speaker 39: marketplace because that's a significant driver,

01:46:05 Speaker 39: and that's been the problem in

01:46:09 Speaker 39: the last several years? Is there's

01:46:11 Speaker 39: been no supply, so if if

01:46:13 Speaker 39: we can get back to a

01:46:17 Speaker 39: supply ratio of eight or ten

01:46:19 Speaker 39: percent vacant market units, then

01:46:22 Speaker 39: we're going to see those prices

01:46:25 Speaker 39: come down, and we're going to

01:46:27 Speaker 39: see relief corporately then, potentially in

01:46:30 Speaker 39: those those rents as well. And

01:46:33 Speaker 39: through you, chair, I don't disagree

01:46:36 Speaker 39: at all. I think that we

01:46:39 Speaker 39: also need to see a increase

01:46:41 Speaker 39: in specific housing. We have a

01:46:45 Speaker 39: large number of the population who

01:46:48 Speaker 39: don't thrive in traditional housing and

01:46:50 Speaker 39: require more. supports, and we have

01:46:54 Speaker 39: members of our population who require

01:46:56 Speaker 39: medical level housing. So we need

01:47:02 Speaker 39: an increase in all levels of

01:47:04 Speaker 39: housing in order to meet that

01:47:06 Speaker 39: demand. Okay, thank you. Any other

01:47:11 Speaker 39: questions, Councillor Mackey? Thank you, Deputy

01:47:13 Speaker 39: Warden, and through you to Mr.

01:47:15 Speaker 39: Taylor, Scott. You mentioned in one

01:47:17 Speaker 39: of your slides consultation, and the

01:47:19 Speaker 39: ministry is doing consultation, and the

01:47:24 Speaker 39: government is doing consultation in regards

01:47:31 Speaker 39: to communal wastewater and water systems.

01:47:33 Speaker 39: I'm only familiar in our municipality

01:47:38 Speaker 39: in campgrounds where they have communal

01:47:41 Speaker 39: water and wastewater. So I was

01:47:43 Speaker 39: a little taken back about the

01:47:46 Speaker 39: responsibility lying on the municipality when

01:47:48 Speaker 39: they fail. Is the province looking

01:47:53 Speaker 39: at expanding the use of communal

01:47:57 Speaker 39: wastewater and water systems? And will

01:48:07 Speaker 39: the municipalities have any right to

01:48:11 Speaker 40: refuse or not if we end

01:48:13 Speaker 40: up bearing the responsibility? Thank you.

01:48:16 Speaker 41: Through you, Mr. Deputy Warden. Thanks

01:48:19 Speaker 41: for your question, Councillor Mackey. Our

01:48:20 Speaker 41: understanding from the consultation materials and

01:48:22 Speaker 41: what we've seen through through AMO

01:48:24 Speaker 41: and Western Ontario Warden's is is

01:48:26 Speaker 41: the province is looking for a

01:48:29 Speaker 41: way to be more permissive of

01:48:31 Speaker 41: those communal systems. Certainly, I think

01:48:34 Speaker 41: municipalities are are in a gentle

01:48:36 Speaker 41: way pushing back to say, you

01:48:43 Speaker 41: know, fair enough. We all need

01:48:45 Speaker 41: to do our part in terms

01:48:48 Speaker 41: of increasing housing supply. but that

01:48:49 Speaker 41: risk element is not to be

01:48:51 Speaker 41: underestimated. And so, in the consultation

01:48:53 Speaker 41: materials associated with this legislation, they

01:48:55 Speaker 29: they they've talked about further consultation

01:48:58 Speaker 29: and and they've talked about streamlined

01:49:00 Speaker 29: municipal and provincial approvals. But we

01:49:02 Speaker 29: don't have sort of that criteria

01:49:03 Speaker 29: yet on what that streamlining would

01:49:04 Speaker 29: be. Certainly, from a staff perspective,

01:49:07 Speaker 29: we're happy to take direction from

01:49:10 Speaker 29: council. if there is strong feelings

01:49:13 Speaker 29: on on that responsibility agreement element

01:49:14 Speaker 29: or or how we could frame

01:49:17 Speaker 29: that to the province to have

01:49:20 Speaker 29: a constructive conversation. Thanks, Scott, Councillor

01:49:22 Speaker 29: Dubreuil. Thank you, and through you,

01:49:23 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden to Mister Taylor, and

01:49:25 Speaker 29: in general, I had written down

01:49:27 Speaker 29: the Ontario Western Municipal Conference and

01:49:30 Speaker 29: where we had heard about this

01:49:32 Speaker 29: communal water and wastewater system. I

01:49:36 Speaker 29: attended that workshop, and the concern

01:49:38 Speaker 29: of you know a communal water

01:49:40 Speaker 29: and wastewater system being constructed not

01:49:42 Speaker 29: to municipal standards. It always reminds

01:49:45 Speaker 29: me of the you know this

01:49:48 Speaker 29: is the twenty fifth anniversary year

01:49:50 Speaker 29: of the Walkerton tragedy. We seem

01:49:51 Speaker 29: to be you know loosening the

01:49:55 Speaker 29: regulations we established municipal water systems

01:49:57 Speaker 29: and regulations to prevent. that from

01:49:59 Speaker 29: ever happening again. So I have,

01:50:01 Speaker 29: I I trust that our commenting

01:50:03 Speaker 29: will be to remind the province

01:50:05 Speaker 29: of the importance of a standard

01:50:08 Speaker 29: to be upheld, and the concern

01:50:09 Speaker 29: that if it's not built to

01:50:11 Speaker 29: our standard, then we can't assume

01:50:12 Speaker 29: the risk. Um, that is was

01:50:14 Speaker 29: is more of a comment and

01:50:15 Speaker 29: an expression of, uh. Stressing that

01:50:17 Speaker 29: point, if I may, I have

01:50:20 Speaker 29: one other comment. Throughout this presentation,

01:50:21 Speaker 29: with all due respect to Toronto,

01:50:23 Speaker 29: I probably heard Toronto referenced four

01:50:24 Speaker 29: times or more. If we could

01:50:25 Speaker 29: convey to the province that one

01:50:28 Speaker 29: size does not fit all, and

01:50:29 Speaker 29: when did we lose sight of

01:50:30 Speaker 29: the importance of taking a rural

01:50:32 Speaker 29: lens, our geography. our infrastructure, our

01:50:34 Speaker 29: environment is very different, and painting

01:50:38 Speaker 29: us with the same brush to

01:50:39 Speaker 29: our more urban sister municipalities is

01:50:44 Speaker 29: is a challenge for us. So,

01:50:47 Speaker 41: thank you for the presentation. It

01:50:54 Speaker 41: it was excellent and really did

01:50:55 Speaker 41: open my eyes to everything that

01:50:58 Speaker 41: is being downloaded. on us. Thank

01:51:00 Speaker 41: you. Okay, Councillor. anybody want to

01:51:03 Speaker 41: comment, Councillor Hope? Go ahead. There

01:51:05 Speaker 41: we go. Thank you, Councillor Mask.

01:51:06 Speaker 29: Okay. This question through you, Mr.

01:51:08 Speaker 29: Warden, is to is to Mr.

01:51:10 Speaker 29: Taylor. I know it was concerned

01:51:11 Speaker 29: that unfortunately. Gray County was not

01:51:13 Speaker 29: included in having access to the

01:51:15 Speaker 29: CIP programme. I find that to

01:51:18 Speaker 29: be unfortunate because that is such

01:51:20 Speaker 29: an excellent mechanism for affordable, attainable

01:51:21 Speaker 29: housing. Could you tell us, give

01:51:22 Speaker 29: us, you know, your perspective on

01:51:24 Speaker 29: why Gray was not on that

01:51:26 Speaker 29: list? Thank you. Yeah, through you,

01:51:27 Speaker 29: Deputy Warden. It's a good question,

01:51:29 Speaker 29: Councillor Hope. I'm not entirely sure.

01:51:32 Speaker 29: So years ago, sort of when

01:51:33 Speaker 29: I started my career in planning,

01:51:35 Speaker 29: it was only lower tiers or

01:51:36 Speaker 29: single tiers that could offer community

01:51:42 Speaker 29: improvement plans. And then the province

01:51:44 Speaker 29: has made changes changes to the

01:51:46 Speaker 29: act. I don't know, ten ish

01:51:49 Speaker 29: years ago. Feels like it was

01:51:52 Speaker 29: a blink, but it was probably

01:51:54 Speaker 22: ten years. And and they they

01:51:56 Speaker 22: allowed for prescribed upper tiers to

01:51:58 Speaker 22: offer community improvement plans. And where

01:51:59 Speaker 22: those prescribed upper tiers could offer

01:52:00 Speaker 22: those community improvement plans. It wasn't

01:52:03 Speaker 22: on the same breadth that a

01:52:04 Speaker 22: a lower tier or single tier

01:52:06 Speaker 22: municipality could offer those plans on.

01:52:09 Speaker 22: So housing was one of those

01:52:11 Speaker 22: things that that specifically those upper

01:52:14 Speaker 22: tiers could speak to in that

01:52:16 Speaker 22: regard. And and so you know,

01:52:18 Speaker 22: flash back to two thousand seventeen

01:52:19 Speaker 22: or eighteen. That's why Gray, working

01:52:20 Speaker 22: with our partners in economic development,

01:52:22 Speaker 22: tourism, and culture, came up with

01:52:23 Speaker 22: the the community improvement plan template

01:52:27 Speaker 22: programme, programme whereby it would still

01:52:31 Speaker 22: be a municipal CIP, but the

01:52:33 Speaker 22: county would would help do some

01:52:35 Speaker 42: of the heavy lifting in terms

01:52:36 Speaker 42: of establishing those CIPs and and

01:52:40 Speaker 42: and and and flow some money

01:52:41 Speaker 42: through as well. More recently, through

01:52:43 Speaker 42: some staff reports from from Liz

01:52:44 Speaker 02: Buckton, and she actually had a

01:52:47 Speaker 02: further report drafted just before Bill

01:52:50 Speaker 02: 60 was announced. Again, asking the

01:52:52 Speaker 02: province to to allow upper tiers

01:52:56 Speaker 02: who aren't prescribed to be able

01:52:57 Speaker 02: to offer this. It was one

01:53:00 Speaker 02: of those things that you know,

01:53:01 Speaker 02: as as a county. staff person,

01:53:03 Speaker 02: we kind of scratched our head

01:53:12 Speaker 02: at you know what what harm

01:53:14 Speaker 02: was there to the province if

01:53:16 Speaker 02: the municipalities at an upper tier

01:55:54 Speaker 02: level wanted to flow money into

02:01:07 Speaker 02: certain programmemes. So it seemed like

02:01:08 Speaker 02: kind of one of those low

02:01:09 Speaker 01: hanging fruit ones. So we're super

02:01:14 Speaker 08: thankful that the province is now

02:01:15 Speaker 08: considering this. But I don't have

02:01:18 Speaker 08: a great answer for you as

02:01:21 Speaker 08: to you know why it wasn't

02:01:24 Speaker 08: done earlier in that regard. Follow

02:01:26 Speaker 08: up, please. So is is there

02:01:28 Speaker 08: an opportunity with Roma delegations? Maybe

02:01:33 Speaker 08: aimo to take this further and

02:01:35 Speaker 08: to see about accessing this programme

02:01:40 Speaker 08: through Deputy Warren. Certainly, we're happy

02:01:43 Speaker 08: to take any direction from Council.

02:01:47 Speaker 08: In in the draft legislation right

02:01:48 Speaker 08: now, that is included, and and

02:01:50 Speaker 08: so if if the legislation were

02:01:52 Speaker 08: to pass as per the draft,

02:01:53 Speaker 08: then then there'd sort of be

02:01:57 Speaker 08: no need for further lobbying in

02:01:58 Speaker 08: that regard, if you will. If

02:01:59 Speaker 08: it's something that. council feels strongly

02:02:02 Speaker 08: about, we want to make our

02:02:04 Speaker 08: voices heard with groups like AMO

02:02:06 Speaker 08: or ROMA or Western Ontario Wardens.

02:02:12 Speaker 08: Certainly happy to put that forward.

02:02:14 Speaker 08: You know, Liz is still got

02:02:18 Speaker 08: her draft report, and and we

02:02:20 Speaker 43: were just kind of chewing over:

02:02:26 Speaker 43: do we still bring something forward?

02:02:30 Speaker 43: Do we not? But I think

02:02:33 Speaker 43: from a staff perspective, we're just

02:02:35 Speaker 43: kind of eagerly waiting to see

02:02:38 Speaker 43: what passes here, and and and

02:02:40 Speaker 43: if it does pass as as

02:02:44 Speaker 43: drafted, then there might not be

02:02:45 Speaker 43: the need for any further advocacy

02:02:48 Speaker 43: in that regard. Okay, thank you

02:02:51 Speaker 43: for the question, Councillor McQueen. I'll

02:02:53 Speaker 43: be quick. Just following up with

02:02:57 Speaker 43: Councillor Debrine. Standardizing one road system

02:02:59 Speaker 43: design, and like in the problem

02:03:01 Speaker 43: material, I'm sure Pat would add

02:03:03 Speaker 43: more to that. We have what

02:03:06 Speaker 43: they call weather issues. So a

02:03:08 Speaker 43: road design in North Bay might

02:03:09 Speaker 43: be different than a road that's

02:03:11 Speaker 43: designed in Mississauga. More recently, just

02:03:13 Speaker 43: we had a Grey County Federation

02:03:16 Speaker 43: of Ag meeting last night. The

02:03:18 Speaker 43: concern is is designing roads for

02:03:19 Speaker 43: large agricultural equipment. Now you're not

02:03:24 Speaker 43: going to devise something in Mississauga.

02:03:25 Speaker 43: I didn't say Toronto that you

02:03:27 Speaker 43: would maybe design differently in Grey

02:03:29 Speaker 43: County, Bruce County, or a rural

02:03:31 Speaker 43: part. And I think that's so

02:03:32 Speaker 43: important about the rural ends. I

02:03:34 Speaker 43: think that should be one of

02:03:36 Speaker 43: our comments back. Is that rural

02:03:39 Speaker 43: ends? Yeah, agreed. Any other? Just

02:03:41 Speaker 43: one observation I made was from

02:03:44 Speaker 43: Scott's comments about the limitation in

02:03:46 Speaker 43: the number of pages for an.

02:03:48 Speaker 43: A number of pages for an

02:03:50 Speaker 43: official plan. I believe it was

02:03:53 Speaker 43: Winston Churchill during the war when

02:03:55 Speaker 43: he was prime minister insisted that

02:03:57 Speaker 43: any report that landed on his

02:03:59 Speaker 43: desk was one page. So there

02:04:01 Speaker 43: may be some merit to it.

02:04:02 Speaker 43: Just saying, just saying. Not picking

02:04:04 Speaker 43: on planning, but just saying. Okay,

02:04:06 Speaker 43: I think we're ready for the

02:04:08 Speaker 43: vote. All those in favour? That

02:04:09 Speaker 43: is carried. Thank you very much.

02:04:13 Speaker 43: Thank you to Scott, Sharon, and

02:04:14 Speaker 43: Nile for that. stretchy report, report

02:04:16 Speaker 43: number. You really? Lunch is going

02:04:18 Speaker 43: to be here in half an

02:04:21 Speaker 43: hour. All right, let's recess for

02:04:22 Speaker 43: five minutes. Okay. One minute warning.

02:04:24 Speaker 43: Okay. I think we have quorum

02:04:26 Speaker 43: back. We'll bring. the meeting back

02:04:28 Speaker 43: to order. Council, it has been

02:04:29 Speaker 43: brought to my attention that there

02:04:32 Speaker 43: is some interest in the gallery

02:04:35 Speaker 43: regarding report number seven F or

02:04:38 Speaker 43: item number on the agenda. Would

02:04:41 Speaker 43: council be obliging to move that

02:04:44 Speaker 43: up to do that now prior

02:04:47 Speaker 43: to lunch? Anyone objecting? Seeing no

02:04:49 Speaker 43: objection, we'll proceed with item seven

02:04:50 Speaker 43: F, which is. And here I

02:04:53 Speaker 43: thought you were all being entertained

02:04:55 Speaker 43: with our deliberations prior to prior

02:04:58 Speaker 44: to now. You'll be back next

02:05:00 Speaker 44: week, I'm sure, to see the

02:05:02 Speaker 44: the next meeting. In any case,

02:05:05 Speaker 44: we're going to deal with the

02:05:07 Speaker 44: budget and finance committee minutes dated

02:05:10 Speaker 44: October 29th. Mary Lou is going

02:05:12 Speaker 44: to speak to them, so Mary

02:05:14 Speaker 44: Lou, the floor is yours, and

02:05:16 Speaker 44: welcome. I need a mover and

02:05:17 Speaker 44: seconder. Sorry, Councillor Debrine and Councillor

02:05:19 Speaker 44: Gregg. Councillor Debrine and Councillor Greg,

02:05:22 Speaker 10: thank you. Thank you, Mr. Vice

02:05:24 Speaker 10: Chair. Budget and Finance met on

02:05:25 Speaker 10: October 29th, and the the primary

02:05:29 Speaker 10: focus of the meeting was ten

02:05:30 Speaker 10: year capital forecast. Corporate capital funding

02:05:34 Speaker 10: needs for 2026, as presented, were

02:05:35 Speaker 10: 21 million 117,500, and that's an

02:05:36 Speaker 10: increase. of three million thirty-two thousand

02:05:40 Speaker 10: two hundred dollars, higher than the

02:05:41 Speaker 10: net capital funding that was in

02:05:43 Speaker 10: the 2025 approved forecast. The increase

02:05:44 Speaker 10: to the capital levy in 2026

02:05:46 Speaker 10: is largely driven by it's

02:05:49 Speaker 10: approximately two point nine million dollars,

02:05:50 Speaker 10: with the impacts in transportation services,

02:05:52 Speaker 10: paramedic services, and housing portfolios. The

02:05:54 Speaker 10: increase we talked about was there

02:05:56 Speaker 10: was an increase set aside for

02:05:59 Speaker 10: asset management totaling one. million seven

02:06:03 Speaker 10: hundred forty-eight thousand one hundred dollars,

02:06:05 Speaker 10: one million just shy of one

02:06:10 Speaker 10: point four million is a levy

02:06:11 Speaker 45: increase, and the remainder of three

02:06:17 Speaker 45: hundred forty-eight thousand eight hundred was

02:06:19 Speaker 45: from the OCIF allocation. There's an

02:06:20 Speaker 45: increase of one hundred twenty-nine thousand

02:06:22 Speaker 45: three hundred to the transfer to

02:06:23 Speaker 45: the Affordable Housing Reserve, included as

02:06:26 Speaker 45: presented earlier in the year, one

02:06:27 Speaker 45: million two hundred forty thousand nine

02:06:29 Speaker 46: hundred dollars funded from the levy

02:06:30 Speaker 46: for the Road Exchange Project, and.

02:06:31 Speaker 46: an increase of one hundred and

02:06:33 Speaker 46: forty-six thousand eight hundred dollars to

02:06:35 Speaker 46: fund ventures for paramedic service base

02:06:37 Speaker 46: builds. As part of the presentation,

02:06:39 Speaker 46: each department provided an overview of

02:06:42 Speaker 46: their capital forecasts, with emphasis on

02:06:44 Speaker 46: years one and three, and anything

02:06:45 Speaker 46: that was new or changed was

02:06:47 Speaker 46: identified, and they responded to questions

02:06:50 Speaker 46: from committee. After the presentations, committee

02:06:53 Speaker 46: recommended two adjustments to the twenty

02:06:54 Speaker 46: twenty six budget and twenty twenty

02:06:56 Speaker 47: seven proposed budget that are reflected

02:06:59 Speaker 47: in the minutes from the. meeting.

02:07:00 Speaker 47: As the minutes from this meeting

02:07:02 Speaker 47: have not been approved by council,

02:07:05 Speaker 47: the adjustments have been noted but

02:07:09 Speaker 47: not incorporated in the draft budget

02:07:11 Speaker 08: that will be discussed on December

02:07:13 Speaker 08: fifth and twelfth. And the final

02:07:14 Speaker 08: meeting topic was the review of

02:07:16 Speaker 08: the twenty twenty five capital project

02:07:19 Speaker 08: status update report based on August

02:07:20 Speaker 08: thirty first internally produced financial statements,

02:07:21 Speaker 08: and it was noted that there

02:07:25 Speaker 08: were two hundred and fifty nine

02:07:26 Speaker 08: capital projects. Stats were shared on

02:07:28 Speaker 08: procurement status and project status. The

02:07:31 Speaker 08: status can be. different. If, for

02:07:33 Speaker 08: example, the procurement has been completed,

02:07:35 Speaker 08: such as awarding an ambulance, but

02:07:41 Speaker 08: there are delays in receiving the

02:07:42 Speaker 08: ambulance due to supply chain. And

02:07:43 Speaker 08: happy to take any questions. Thank

02:07:46 Speaker 08: you, Mary Lou. And as you

02:07:47 Speaker 10: indicated, just to be clear, regardless

02:07:49 Speaker 10: of what we do with the

02:07:53 Speaker 10: minutes today, they are recommendations to

02:07:54 Speaker 10: the draft budget. So there is

02:07:56 Speaker 10: an opportunity to change. through the

02:07:57 Speaker 10: budget deliberations, but nonetheless, if there's

02:07:59 Speaker 10: changes to be requested or questions,

02:08:01 Speaker 10: let's have them. Councillor Nielsen, please.

02:08:03 Speaker 10: Just a first question or first

02:08:05 Speaker 10: comment, I guess, because the recommendations

02:08:06 Speaker 10: that are being made here to

02:08:10 Speaker 10: this body came from a smaller

02:08:11 Speaker 10: committee. I would like to move

02:08:12 Speaker 10: that we split the question. Some

02:08:14 Speaker 30: of the questions have specific requests

02:08:17 Speaker 30: that are being removed. Others are

02:08:18 Speaker 30: different directions for future budgets. So

02:08:21 Speaker 30: I'd like to split the question.

02:08:22 Speaker 30: So. we can vote on them

02:08:28 Speaker 30: individually. Okay. You want to move?

02:08:34 Speaker 30: You're moving that we split each

02:08:37 Speaker 30: motion separately and vote on each

02:08:39 Speaker 48: motion separately, or do you wish

02:08:41 Speaker 43: one or two to come out?

02:08:42 Speaker 43: Just for the premise of one

02:08:47 Speaker 43: or two that might be voted

02:08:53 Speaker 43: on separately and amendments that might

02:08:55 Speaker 49: be made, split the question. Have

02:08:58 Speaker 49: the I think there's six different

02:08:59 Speaker 49: recommendations coming out of here. Some

02:09:01 Speaker 50: of them will be pretty quick

02:09:02 Speaker 50: motions. Others might take more conversation.

02:09:04 Speaker 50: Fair enough. Is there a seconder

02:09:06 Speaker 50: for that motion to split the

02:09:09 Speaker 50: question, Councillor Carlton? Thank you. Any

02:09:11 Speaker 50: discussion, Councillor Greg? Is that including

02:09:13 Speaker 50: lost motions because those also show

02:09:16 Speaker 50: in the minutes? I'm going to

02:09:17 Speaker 50: ask the clerk on that one,

02:09:20 Speaker 50: Madam Clerk. And thank you, and

02:09:22 Speaker 50: my apologies to Council and the

02:09:24 Speaker 50: public. We did have a bit

02:09:26 Speaker 50: of a glitch when we. were

02:09:29 Speaker 50: posting our revised agenda. I don't

02:09:33 Speaker 50: know exactly when it happened, but

02:09:34 Speaker 50: some of you may have seen

02:09:36 Speaker 19: those motions that were lost, and

02:09:39 Speaker 19: some of you may have not

02:09:40 Speaker 19: seen them at all. The ones

02:09:41 Speaker 19: that are intended to be considered

02:09:45 Speaker 19: here today and that are on

02:09:50 Speaker 19: the floor do not include those

02:09:52 Speaker 19: lost motions. They're only the ones

02:09:53 Speaker 19: that were voted and supported at

02:09:57 Speaker 19: the committee level, and they should

02:09:59 Speaker 19: be showing correctly on your eSCRIBE

02:10:00 Speaker 51: packages and on your web on

02:10:01 Speaker 51: the website now. So that would.

02:10:03 Speaker 51: entail six, not the ones that

02:10:04 Speaker 51: are lost. Is that okay? Any

02:10:06 Speaker 51: other questions on the amendment to

02:10:08 Speaker 51: split the questions? Not seeing any.

02:10:09 Speaker 51: I'll call the question. All those

02:10:12 Speaker 51: in favour? That just carried. So

02:10:14 Speaker 51: we'll consider the first, which is

02:10:16 Speaker 51: that the reevaluated for opportunities to

02:10:17 Speaker 51: scope reductions, and that information be

02:10:19 Speaker 51: provided on the cost of the

02:10:22 Speaker 51: project. Is the mover and seconder

02:10:24 Speaker 51: for that motion? Sorry, we don't.

02:10:26 Speaker 51: Okay, we just need. to vote

02:10:27 Speaker 51: on. We don't need a mover

02:10:33 Speaker 51: and seconder. Any discussion on that

02:10:35 Speaker 51: particular motion? Not seeing any. I'll

02:10:38 Speaker 51: call the question. All those in

02:10:41 Speaker 39: favour? That is carried. The second

02:10:43 Speaker 39: one is the paramedic services base

02:10:46 Speaker 39: in Aitken be deferred to the

02:10:49 Speaker 39: twenty twenty seven budget. Any discussion?

02:10:51 Speaker 39: Councillor Nielsen. Just a quick comment

02:10:54 Speaker 39: on this one. I do think

02:10:57 Speaker 39: that there's some logic to this

02:11:00 Speaker 39: deferral. We we are adding the

02:11:02 Speaker 39: Dundalk paramedic base that. The Dundalk

02:11:04 Speaker 39: paramedic base—that was a surprise cost.

02:11:08 Speaker 39: I think this is a reasonable

02:11:10 Speaker 39: change in the in the plan

02:11:11 Speaker 39: of the paramedic services. As we're

02:11:17 Speaker 39: trying to, you know, we're making

02:11:19 Speaker 39: the same amount of investment into

02:11:21 Speaker 39: paramedic services, just maybe changing location

02:11:24 Speaker 39: based upon necessity now. So I

02:11:26 Speaker 43: think this is just a very

02:11:28 Speaker 43: logical addition. Okay, thank you for

02:11:31 Speaker 43: that. Any further questions, Council Bordignon?

02:11:34 Speaker 43: Thank you, Deputy Warden. Through you,

02:11:38 Speaker 43: in the same vein, I do

02:11:41 Speaker 43: have a question, though. Does does

02:11:44 Speaker 43: this in the minutes talking about

02:11:46 Speaker 43: feverish? Minutes talking about Faversham, Thornbury,

02:11:48 Speaker 43: and the other bases in Cobble

02:11:50 Speaker 43: Beach. Is does that affect the

02:11:52 Speaker 43: moving the one out or deferral?

02:11:57 Speaker 43: Does that do a domino effect?

02:12:00 Speaker 43: Ready. Are you, Mr. Deputy Warden?

02:12:05 Speaker 43: It. We did look, and I'll

02:12:07 Speaker 43: I'll look to Kevin. We did

02:12:09 Speaker 43: talk about moving that you would

02:12:11 Speaker 43: only have so many bases a

02:12:12 Speaker 43: year. Kevin, maybe you want to

02:12:14 Speaker 43: comment, please. The discussion was is

02:12:14 Speaker 43: that we are building Fever Sham

02:12:15 Speaker 43: and Denoc. It's it's ongoing right

02:12:19 Speaker 43: now, so we do have a

02:12:21 Speaker 43: number of bases in the project

02:12:22 Speaker 52: scope right now. So we did

02:12:23 Speaker 52: talk about you know because of

02:12:26 Speaker 52: that, and probably best, and we

02:12:28 Speaker 52: also have the the deployment review

02:12:29 Speaker 52: happening next year with budget approval

02:12:31 Speaker 52: that those type of recommendations will

02:12:33 Speaker 52: go forward. So the the talk

02:12:35 Speaker 52: was is that eight would be

02:12:37 Speaker 52: deferred until twenty twenty seven, but

02:12:39 Speaker 52: there wasn't really any talk about

02:12:41 Speaker 52: moving anything further out. But again,

02:12:42 Speaker 52: we could look at the comprehensive

02:12:45 Speaker 52: deployment review to help best guide

02:12:47 Speaker 52: us next year. Okay, good. Any

02:12:51 Speaker 52: other questions? Not seeing any. I'll

02:12:55 Speaker 52: call the question. All those in

02:12:57 Speaker 52: favour? Aye is carried. Number three:

02:12:58 Speaker 52: the funding for the experimental acres

02:13:00 Speaker 52: project in the amount of twenty

02:13:01 Speaker 52: eight thousand. Be In the amount

02:13:02 Speaker 52: of twenty-eight thousand, be removed from

02:13:04 Speaker 52: the draft twenty-twenty-six budget discussion. Councillor

02:13:06 Speaker 52: McQueen, like Mr. Ward, and I

02:13:08 Speaker 52: did pull the—I think it was

02:13:10 Speaker 52: six P—that talked about what the

02:13:15 Speaker 52: Ag services in Markdale do, and

02:13:17 Speaker 52: one of those pages, and there,

02:13:20 Speaker 52: everybody looks back to it. It

02:13:23 Speaker 52: did talk about the experimental acres,

02:13:25 Speaker 52: and pardon the pun, but a

02:13:26 Speaker 52: little bit of seed money goes

02:13:28 Speaker 52: a long way to developing ways

02:13:31 Speaker 52: of resilience. We know we're dealing

02:13:32 Speaker 52: with climate change, and a lot

02:13:34 Speaker 52: of those experimental projects are are

02:13:36 Speaker 52: based on small funding that create

02:13:37 Speaker 52: big results. And I'll use an

02:13:39 Speaker 52: example of what twenty twenty five

02:13:41 Speaker 52: years ago, no tilling, how that

02:13:44 Speaker 52: changed a lot of of things

02:13:47 Speaker 52: in our practices. So I would

02:13:49 Speaker 52: say that this should be something

02:13:51 Speaker 52: that should be left in the

02:13:52 Speaker 52: budget. Okay, thank you, Councillor Dubreuil.

02:13:54 Speaker 52: Thank you, and through you, to

02:13:56 Speaker 52: Mary Lou, and to the minutes.

02:13:59 Speaker 52: My understanding was that this is

02:14:00 Speaker 52: a recommendation to remove the item

02:14:02 Speaker 52: from the 2026 budget, but that

02:14:04 Speaker 52: it would still show as having

02:14:07 Speaker 52: been removed, so we don't lose

02:14:10 Speaker 52: sight of it. And it would

02:14:12 Speaker 52: then be up to the committee,

02:14:14 Speaker 52: the whole, and council to determine

02:14:17 Speaker 52: what goes in, what stays out,

02:14:20 Speaker 52: on our December 5th and 12th

02:14:24 Speaker 52: deliberations. If you could confirm that.

02:14:26 Speaker 52: right now it's just going to

02:14:30 Speaker 52: kind of sit in in limbo

02:14:32 Speaker 52: for us to determine. And through

02:14:35 Speaker 52: you, Mr. Deputy Warden, because of

02:14:37 Speaker 52: the timelines that this meeting was

02:14:38 Speaker 52: October twenty ninth, the minutes come

02:14:40 Speaker 52: here today, and they will not

02:14:42 Speaker 52: be passed by County Council until

02:14:44 Speaker 52: November twenty seventh. But there was

02:14:46 Speaker 52: the decision made that because Council

02:14:47 Speaker 52: hasn't approved the minutes. Everything that

02:14:49 Speaker 52: an adjustment was requested has remained

02:14:50 Speaker 52: in the budget because we didn't

02:14:55 Speaker 52: have council's approval in order to

02:14:57 Speaker 52: make those adjustments. So when you

02:15:00 Speaker 52: see the package comes out for

02:15:03 Speaker 52: December fifth and twelfth, it will

02:15:04 Speaker 52: contain the eight and base still

02:15:06 Speaker 52: for twenty six, and it will

02:15:07 Speaker 52: contain mental acres for twenty eight

02:15:10 Speaker 52: thousand. Okay. Thank you. Any further

02:15:13 Speaker 52: discussion, Councillor Greg? Thank you, and

02:15:16 Speaker 52: I do have some comments, and

02:15:18 Speaker 52: I'm awarded five minutes to make

02:15:20 Speaker 52: them under the procedural bylaws. So

02:15:22 Speaker 52: let me know if I get

02:15:23 Speaker 52: the five minutes, but I think

02:15:25 Speaker 52: I'll just be under that. This

02:15:28 Speaker 52: was my motion, so I'm glad

02:15:29 Speaker 52: to speak to it, and I'm

02:15:31 Speaker 52: just going to go back to

02:15:32 Speaker 52: an email I received on September

02:15:35 Speaker 52: 22, 2023. As a retired farmer

02:15:37 Speaker 52: now living in Georgian Bluffs, I

02:15:39 Speaker 52: was a charter member of Burlington's

02:15:40 Speaker 52: Sustainable Development Committee and a member

02:15:42 Speaker 52: of. conservation, the Halton Board of

02:15:43 Speaker 52: Directors. I was named Halton Region

02:15:45 Speaker 52: Conservationist of the Year in 1886,

02:15:47 Speaker 52: so I am not anti anti

02:15:50 Speaker 52: green. Goes on through a plethora

02:15:51 Speaker 52: of different initiatives that this individual

02:15:54 Speaker 52: has invested in their own property,

02:15:55 Speaker 52: and it concludes: fiscal sustainability is

02:15:58 Speaker 52: a stranger to our governments. And

02:16:01 Speaker 52: I read that because of all

02:16:05 Speaker 52: the emails which we've received from

02:16:09 Speaker 52: the local climate action teams, and

02:16:11 Speaker 52: I'm thankful for all the work

02:16:12 Speaker 52: that they do, but. it's very

02:16:14 Speaker 52: easy to send emails to counsel.

02:16:17 Speaker 52: In fact, I was surprised how

02:16:19 Speaker 52: quickly that the emails started coming

02:16:22 Speaker 52: in after the budget meeting. It's

02:16:23 Speaker 52: it was somewhat unusual. One of

02:16:25 Speaker 52: the premises of the farm rate

02:16:27 Speaker 52: tax ratio being a quarter point

02:16:29 Speaker 52: is because it uses no services

02:16:31 Speaker 52: effectively. So now it's starting to.

02:16:33 Speaker 52: How about we look at increasing

02:16:34 Speaker 52: that tax ratio from a quarter

02:16:35 Speaker 52: point back up to. thirty points

02:16:38 Speaker 52: or forty points, and see what

02:16:40 Speaker 52: that does for the tax base

02:16:41 Speaker 52: across the county. Because it sounds

02:16:44 Speaker 52: like it is starting to use

02:16:46 Speaker 52: services, it's starting to use bigger

02:16:47 Speaker 52: road construction, it's starting to use

02:16:49 Speaker 52: sustainable practices, seed funding. There's a

02:16:51 Speaker 52: company out there called Bear, and

02:16:52 Speaker 52: one of the companies they own

02:16:54 Speaker 52: is Decal. It's in their best

02:16:57 Speaker 52: interest, no different than it's in

02:17:01 Speaker 52: the best interest of every company

02:17:04 Speaker 52: that I deal with in my

02:17:05 Speaker 52: own business, where carbon footprint is

02:17:07 Speaker 52: actually. stamped on some of the

02:17:09 Speaker 52: product. You can see what the

02:17:11 Speaker 52: impact is of the manufacturing in

02:17:14 Speaker 22: it. It's in Bayer's best interest

02:17:17 Speaker 22: to their shareholders to invest in

02:17:19 Speaker 22: research and development, which is why

02:17:22 Speaker 22: in DCOB they invest millions of

02:17:25 Speaker 22: dollars in seed resiliency and and

02:17:29 Speaker 22: being able to adapt seeds to

02:17:32 Speaker 22: various climatic changes. This is a

02:17:34 Speaker 22: further step. My motion here it

02:17:37 Speaker 22: doesn't eliminate one job. It impacts

02:17:38 Speaker 22: six people, or six initiatives across

02:17:40 Speaker 22: the county in the year 2025.

02:17:43 Speaker 22: In terms of corresponding with different

02:17:47 Speaker 22: people, I have someone who's very

02:17:49 Speaker 22: talkative at the Katy Livestock Market,

02:17:51 Speaker 22: and in Gray County, you can't

02:17:53 Speaker 22: get much more involved with the,

02:17:54 Speaker 22: the farming agricultural community than Katy.

02:17:56 Speaker 22: And I asked how many people

02:17:57 Speaker 22: brought up the topic of experimental

02:17:58 Speaker 22: acres in the last two weeks

02:18:00 Speaker 22: at the Katy Market, and the

02:18:01 Speaker 22: answer was zero. So we have

02:18:03 Speaker 22: next door to us a county

02:18:04 Speaker 22: that's looking at four percent tax

02:18:05 Speaker 22: increase, and they're looking to get

02:18:07 Speaker 22: down to three and a half

02:18:09 Speaker 22: percent at Simcoe. We are at

02:18:10 Speaker 22: about six point nine percent. We

02:18:11 Speaker 22: had projected last year for two

02:18:14 Speaker 22: thousand twenty-six four point nine seven

02:18:15 Speaker 22: percent. We're forecasting one point six

02:18:17 Speaker 22: million dollars of growth, and we're

02:18:18 Speaker 22: at six point eight seven percent

02:18:20 Speaker 22: coming out of that meeting. So

02:18:22 Speaker 22: if you vote against. this, I

02:18:23 Speaker 22: do challenge my colleagues. Please stand

02:18:25 Speaker 22: up after. Inform me of where

02:18:26 Speaker 22: you would like me to look

02:18:28 Speaker 22: on November 26 for further cuts,

02:18:33 Speaker 22: because that tax increase is not

02:18:36 Speaker 22: sustainable, and on the shoulders of

02:18:38 Speaker 22: record growth that we've had as

02:18:40 Speaker 22: a county over the years. So,

02:18:42 Speaker 22: we're on a trajectory that we

02:18:44 Speaker 22: have to change. So, please inform

02:18:46 Speaker 22: me where I can further look

02:18:49 Speaker 22: for savings, because in the minutes

02:18:51 Speaker 22: it does state every cut motion

02:18:53 Speaker 22: was Councillor Greg. That's on the

02:18:54 Speaker 22: record there. So, just please inform

02:18:56 Speaker 22: me. further, and we'll look to

02:18:59 Speaker 22: get that money down. But just

02:19:01 Speaker 22: to correct a little bit, the

02:19:03 Speaker 22: correspondence I received, it indicated that

02:19:06 Speaker 22: I was informed about Bill Gates's

02:19:07 Speaker 22: dialogueue. It had nothing to do

02:19:09 Speaker 22: with it. If you watch the

02:19:11 Speaker 22: minutes or watch the video, my

02:19:15 Speaker 22: motion on this came before any

02:19:18 Speaker 22: conversation about Bill Gates, and I

02:19:19 Speaker 53: have never read his correspondence. and

02:19:21 Speaker 22: frankly, don't plan on doing so.

02:19:23 Speaker 22: This is about what's best for

02:19:24 Speaker 22: the county right now in the

02:19:25 Speaker 22: tough budget year. I get it;

02:19:27 Speaker 22: it's a it's a great project,

02:19:28 Speaker 22: but it's one of many great

02:19:29 Speaker 22: projects that comes before the county.

02:19:31 Speaker 22: We had a great project a

02:19:33 Speaker 22: year ago from a lady at

02:19:35 Speaker 22: the southeast southwest corner, and she

02:19:37 Speaker 22: had a youth centre that she

02:19:39 Speaker 22: approached the county about funding, and

02:19:41 Speaker 22: they they got funding from the

02:19:42 Speaker 22: province, which was wonderful, but we

02:19:44 Speaker 22: as a council didn't fund that

02:19:48 Speaker 22: initiative, and. we as a council

02:19:54 Speaker 22: are looking at a tough budget

02:19:57 Speaker 22: year, and that's why we should

02:20:02 Speaker 22: not be funding this initiative this

02:20:03 Speaker 54: year. Thanks. Thanks, sir. Any other,

02:20:05 Speaker 54: Councillor McQueen? Well, I must rebuttle,

02:20:07 Speaker 54: but start with this programme is

02:20:09 Speaker 54: ran through the Grey Ag Services,

02:20:11 Speaker 54: which basically runs on a sheet.

02:20:15 Speaker 54: We all know, and they do

02:20:17 Speaker 54: great jobs, great work. There's 156

02:20:20 Speaker 54: meetings, 30 different groups that go

02:20:21 Speaker 54: through that Grey Ag Services. Gray

02:20:22 Speaker 54: Ag Services office that use those

02:20:24 Speaker 54: facilities, and you talk about not

02:20:28 Speaker 54: knowing anything about it. The Gray

02:20:30 Speaker 54: Ag Services also has looked after

02:20:31 Speaker 54: Gray the Farmers Week in January,

02:20:32 Speaker 54: which they have this year six

02:20:34 Speaker 54: different sorry six different units or

02:20:35 Speaker 54: different days on different things

02:20:38 Speaker 54: around agriculture. I'm pretty sure they're

02:20:40 Speaker 54: going to be talking about this

02:20:41 Speaker 54: experimental acres at that at that

02:20:42 Speaker 54: event. I will say that again

02:20:43 Speaker 54: for the for the discussion we're

02:20:47 Speaker 54: having here today on twenty eight

02:20:49 Speaker 54: thousand dollars of the of the

02:20:51 Speaker 54: millions of dollars budget that we're

02:20:53 Speaker 54: going to be looking at. You

02:20:54 Speaker 54: know where I see a place

02:20:55 Speaker 54: to cut is this download upload.

02:20:59 Speaker 54: That's where your big money is

02:21:01 Speaker 54: going to be affecting this budget,

02:21:03 Speaker 54: but we're not going to go

02:21:06 Speaker 54: there right now. I want to

02:21:09 Speaker 54: give you a small little example

02:21:10 Speaker 54: of something that I saw witnessing

02:21:12 Speaker 54: myself back in the early two

02:21:13 Speaker 54: thousands, where we had a lot

02:21:15 Speaker 54: of hot summers, and I had

02:21:18 Speaker 54: two properties, my own farm and

02:21:21 Speaker 54: my neighbour's. farm, and my farm

02:21:24 Speaker 54: had 80 acres of no fence

02:21:26 Speaker 54: rows, and the neighbouring farm was

02:21:28 Speaker 02: still the 10 acres. It was

02:21:31 Speaker 02: a hot summer. There was no

02:21:36 Speaker 02: second cut on my 80 acres,

02:21:37 Speaker 02: but there was second cut in

02:21:41 Speaker 55: those 10 acre fields. So this

02:21:48 Speaker 55: year in the stewardship agreements, we

02:21:49 Speaker 55: incentivized money for people, farmers, to

02:21:56 Speaker 56: plant trees back and create those

02:22:02 Speaker 56: fence rows, fence rows, or creating

02:22:06 Speaker 56: winds or barriers for the hot

02:22:13 Speaker 56: winds that dry out your land.

02:22:19 Speaker 56: so there's little wee things,

02:22:25 Speaker 56: and I go back to this

02:22:29 Speaker 56: experimental acres that the little things

02:22:34 Speaker 56: that can come out of here,

02:22:41 Speaker 56: successfully or not, are small things

02:22:48 Speaker 56: that can, if they're successful, they

02:22:52 Speaker 56: can be communicated onto the farmers

02:22:55 Speaker 56: of Gray County and throughout. But

02:22:59 Speaker 56: if you don't know, if you

02:23:07 Speaker 56: don't try, so maybe there's opportunities

02:23:08 Speaker 57: for other sources of funding. But

02:23:11 Speaker 57: I think it's been quite successful.

02:23:17 Speaker 56: We had at that stewardship Gray

02:23:23 Speaker 56: Bruce meeting I had a few

02:23:29 Speaker 56: weeks. back, representatives from Great Egg

02:23:31 Speaker 56: Services talked about this experimental lakers,

02:23:35 Speaker 56: and I would say maybe maybe

02:23:37 Speaker 56: they need to come to this

02:23:42 Speaker 56: body and talk a little bit

02:23:43 Speaker 56: more in depth of what they're

02:23:46 Speaker 56: doing to give a little bit

02:23:47 Speaker 56: of more insight of what they're

02:23:52 Speaker 56: doing, and and I'm sure Lori

02:23:53 Speaker 56: would be quite happy to come

02:23:54 Speaker 56: here. But going back to the

02:23:59 Speaker 56: egg services, this is run under

02:24:00 Speaker 56: them, and they do an amazing

02:24:02 Speaker 56: job on the shoestring budget that

02:24:03 Speaker 56: they have, and they they just

02:24:05 Speaker 56: can't figure. out for a little

02:24:10 Speaker 56: bit of money how far this

02:24:12 Speaker 56: could go. So I'll leave it

02:24:17 Speaker 56: at that. Thank you. Any other

02:24:21 Speaker 56: any other questions? Discussion? Not, Councillor

02:24:24 Speaker 58: Pringle. Yeah, thanks, sir. Everyone. Yeah,

02:24:29 Speaker 56: I'm. We support behind Councillor beside

02:24:33 Speaker 56: me here. Also on that too.

02:24:36 Speaker 56: The the Grey Agri Services does

02:24:41 Speaker 56: such an amazing job with the

02:24:47 Speaker 56: little bit of funding that. they

02:24:50 Speaker 56: get and working within the county,

02:24:52 Speaker 56: I would like to see it

02:24:55 Speaker 56: maybe to be tweaked on how

02:24:58 Speaker 56: you get the grant money and

02:25:00 Speaker 56: how that's all all done down

02:25:04 Speaker 56: the road. But I don't want

02:25:06 Speaker 56: to see the opportunity for it

02:25:08 Speaker 56: to disappear right off the right

02:25:12 Speaker 56: off the budget. I think there

02:25:16 Speaker 56: is value there and maybe needs

02:25:19 Speaker 56: to be tweaked on who we

02:25:20 Speaker 56: who we allow to do what

02:25:21 Speaker 56: things. So as far as the

02:25:24 Speaker 56: environmental or experimental goes. I did

02:25:29 Speaker 56: go through the list of what

02:25:35 Speaker 56: was done, and there's a few

02:25:37 Speaker 56: things I picked out there that

02:25:38 Speaker 56: maybe didn't really qualify, in my

02:25:40 Speaker 56: mind, as to being something that

02:25:44 Speaker 56: is you know actually needed as

02:25:47 Speaker 56: to being an experimental project. But

02:25:50 Speaker 56: I don't want to see it

02:25:53 Speaker 56: disappear. I think there's going to

02:25:55 Speaker 56: be some. There's valid information comes

02:25:58 Speaker 56: from that on small properties, whether

02:26:02 Speaker 56: it be five acres, two acres,

02:26:04 Speaker 56: one acre, to make a decision

02:26:10 Speaker 56: on all. On possible benefits down

02:26:16 Speaker 56: the road, and it's part of

02:26:17 Speaker 56: it. It's part of agriculture. It's

02:26:19 Speaker 56: all part of it. We expand

02:26:23 Speaker 56: and change all the time. So,

02:26:26 Speaker 56: I'm also in support of not

02:26:29 Speaker 56: removing it from the budget. Yep.

02:26:33 Speaker 56: Okay. Thank you. Any other discussion

02:26:35 Speaker 56: or questions? Not seeing any. I'll

02:26:39 Speaker 09: call the question. Councillor Eccles, are

02:26:41 Speaker 09: you voting, or are you asking

02:26:44 Speaker 09: for a question? Go ahead. It's

02:26:46 Speaker 09: not about as much of a

02:26:49 Speaker 09: question as it would be a

02:26:51 Speaker 09: statement. It's not about experimental acres

02:26:54 Speaker 09: and gray agri services. We support

02:26:55 Speaker 09: a we support the gray agri

02:26:59 Speaker 09: services with housing, office space, quite

02:27:02 Speaker 09: a bit in that. I questioned.

02:27:05 Speaker 09: strategically, how far do we go

02:27:08 Speaker 09: into these programmemes? If we're into

02:27:12 Speaker 09: supporting this programme and distributing property

02:27:17 Speaker 09: taxpayers' money, where's the next? Or

02:27:19 Speaker 09: what's the precedent that it's set,

02:27:23 Speaker 09: strategically? is it Viking surveys, an

02:27:24 Speaker 09: industry? Is it cranberry ciderry? Where

02:27:25 Speaker 09: in it is this part of

02:27:29 Speaker 09: what Gray County should be going?

02:27:31 Speaker 09: How far outside of what we're

02:27:33 Speaker 09: here to do is this got?

02:27:35 Speaker 09: Is this God? We've expanded tremendously.

02:27:38 Speaker 09: I was a farmer, and we

02:27:41 Speaker 09: did, you know, I had test

02:27:45 Speaker 09: plots of corn, alfalfa, a lot

02:27:48 Speaker 09: of that. But being an independent

02:27:53 Speaker 09: businessman, how much is dependent? on

02:27:54 Speaker 09: this, and I don't think that

02:28:00 Speaker 09: getting at what we're wanting to

02:28:05 Speaker 09: do—that this is the right way

02:28:07 Speaker 09: to do it. That's why you

02:28:10 Speaker 09: know, second of the motion to

02:28:11 Speaker 09: put it on the floor. We've

02:28:13 Speaker 09: heard a lot of debate about

02:28:16 Speaker 09: Bill Gates, very visionary, in a

02:28:19 Speaker 09: couple of those letters that have

02:28:21 Speaker 09: came to us over the last

02:28:24 Speaker 09: few days, last two weeks. Then

02:28:26 Speaker 09: again, there was another. There's a

02:28:28 Speaker 09: couple of other ones that said

02:28:30 Speaker 09: he doesn't even live here, so

02:28:33 Speaker 09: we shouldn't even listen to him.

02:28:36 Speaker 09: So I'm slightly confused about what

02:28:40 Speaker 09: to believe, and what even is

02:28:43 Speaker 09: in that op-ed that Bill Gates

02:28:46 Speaker 09: gave. But in my mind, it's

02:28:48 Speaker 59: more of where we have as

02:28:50 Speaker 59: a county, and my. friend across

02:28:51 Speaker 59: the row said about

02:28:54 Speaker 59: uploading and downloading, and how much

02:28:56 Speaker 59: of this is that download? Is

02:29:00 Speaker 59: it in our interests and our

02:29:03 Speaker 59: use of taxpayers' dollars, property taxpayers'

02:29:07 Speaker 59: dollars, to get the best out

02:29:11 Speaker 59: of this for us to be

02:29:14 Speaker 59: doing it? I was thinking last

02:29:19 Speaker 59: night, what's the next thing? Canada

02:29:21 Speaker 59: hasn't won a World Series in

02:29:25 Speaker 59: thirty-some odd years. Should we put

02:29:27 Speaker 59: putting Grey County taxpayers' money into

02:29:31 Speaker 59: winning a World Series for us?

02:29:33 Speaker 59: It's kind of a bad example.

02:29:36 Speaker 59: But the thought is, it's over

02:29:38 Speaker 59: where we should be. I think

02:29:42 Speaker 59: we've got to get back to

02:29:44 Speaker 59: doing what we do right and

02:29:47 Speaker 59: do good. and do well. And

02:29:51 Speaker 59: then we can make an impact

02:29:53 Speaker 59: on climate change. And I'm a

02:29:55 Speaker 60: great supporter of that, because I

02:29:56 Speaker 60: think I'm the only person here

02:29:58 Speaker 60: who drove an EV here today.

02:30:01 Speaker 60: I'm committed to climate change. But

02:30:02 Speaker 60: I'm committed to Gray County doing

02:30:07 Speaker 60: what Gray County should be. doing,

02:30:11 Speaker 60: not just what we're mandated, but

02:30:14 Speaker 60: what we should be doing. And

02:30:17 Speaker 60: this, in my mind, is probably

02:30:20 Speaker 60: something that yes, could be left

02:30:23 Speaker 60: to Gray AgriServices to deliver. But

02:30:25 Speaker 60: is it Gray County' responsibility to

02:30:28 Speaker 60: be funding it? And I think

02:30:30 Speaker 60: we've stepped way out of our

02:30:34 Speaker 60: bounds on that. Is that? five?

02:30:36 Speaker 60: Thank you. Thank you, sir. Any

02:30:38 Speaker 60: further comments, Councillor Debrine, and then

02:30:41 Speaker 60: Councillor Body. Thank you, and through

02:30:43 Speaker 60: you, while I, I absolutely agree

02:30:45 Speaker 60: that we need to look at

02:30:47 Speaker 60: every opportunity to reduce our budget

02:30:50 Speaker 60: and to look for ways what's

02:30:52 Speaker 60: necessary and what's not necessary. But

02:30:54 Speaker 60: I'm, I'm reminded that agriculture is

02:30:56 Speaker 60: one of our primary employers. and

02:31:03 Speaker 60: contributors to the GDP, and that

02:31:04 Speaker 60: Gray County, I hear this at

02:31:05 Speaker 60: AMO all the time, is a

02:31:06 Speaker 02: model to be followed, and people

02:31:10 Speaker 02: look to our agricultural community and

02:31:11 Speaker 02: the advancements that they are making

02:31:13 Speaker 02: by doing these small things. Small

02:31:15 Speaker 02: actions can can create tremendous results,

02:31:18 Speaker 02: and so while I'm I'm supporting

02:31:21 Speaker 02: I'm supportive of looking at all

02:31:24 Speaker 02: opportunities to reduce our budget. I

02:31:27 Speaker 02: am supportive of having it as

02:31:29 Speaker 02: a line as long as we

02:31:31 Speaker 02: don't lose sight of it. To

02:31:34 Speaker 02: Councillor Pringle's comment is, maybe we

02:31:35 Speaker 02: needs to be tweaked. Maybe we

02:31:38 Speaker 02: need to scale it back a

02:31:43 Speaker 02: bit. Maybe there's a different vetting

02:31:45 Speaker 02: opportunity, but that comes from staff

02:31:46 Speaker 02: advising us on the benefits, pros,

02:31:48 Speaker 02: the cons, and. so I'm I'm

02:31:49 Speaker 02: looking forward to our deliberations on

02:31:53 Speaker 02: the budget, and I I support

02:31:54 Speaker 02: the budget and finance committee's approach

02:31:58 Speaker 02: and their work in providing us

02:32:00 Speaker 02: suggestions and recommendations. But at the

02:32:02 Speaker 02: the bottom line is is is

02:32:03 Speaker 02: what is good, and what do

02:32:05 Speaker 02: we need? What do we need

02:32:06 Speaker 02: to do now? What do we

02:32:07 Speaker 02: need to do? in the future?

02:32:09 Speaker 02: I'm, I'm on the fence about

02:32:12 Speaker 02: the experimental acres or to the

02:32:15 Speaker 02: level in which we contribute it,

02:32:17 Speaker 02: contribute to it. But I don't

02:32:18 Speaker 02: want to lose sight of it

02:32:19 Speaker 02: because I think it's done some

02:32:22 Speaker 02: remarkable work and some great initiatives

02:32:25 Speaker 02: have come out of that that

02:32:26 Speaker 02: other agricultural farms can then model.

02:32:29 Speaker 02: Thank you, Councillor Body. Thank you.

02:32:32 Speaker 02: Warden. I wonder if somebody can

02:32:34 Speaker 02: answer this question. The opposition to

02:32:36 Speaker 02: this seems to be all around

02:32:39 Speaker 02: climate change, but as I'm looking

02:32:40 Speaker 02: at the gray agricultural services, specifically

02:32:42 Speaker 02: 2025 experimental acres projects, I'm not

02:32:44 Speaker 02: seeing the climate change factor in

02:32:46 Speaker 02: there. Remedial mulch for fruit trees,

02:32:50 Speaker 02: forage trials for strip grazing, pasturized

02:32:52 Speaker 02: poultry for soil fertility, overseeding turanet.

02:32:55 Speaker 02: Overseeding turan to extend fall grazing,

02:33:02 Speaker 02: late summer seeding of hay, creation

02:33:07 Speaker 02: of apple guilds. Good projects. I

02:33:08 Speaker 61: get from Councillor McQueen that these

02:33:11 Speaker 61: are agricultural. I'm I'm missing the

02:33:15 Speaker 61: connection with climate change on those.

02:33:17 Speaker 61: That's that's. I don't understand how

02:33:21 Speaker 61: they tie in. To the climate

02:33:24 Speaker 62: change discussion, it it seems like

02:33:28 Speaker 62: we're talking about two different things

02:33:30 Speaker 62: altogether. Thanks, Mary Lou. Do you

02:33:34 Speaker 62: have a response to that, or

02:33:36 Speaker 08: is Randy will have a go

02:33:39 Speaker 08: at it? Randy, please. Thank you

02:33:42 Speaker 08: for that. And and if I

02:33:42 Speaker 08: might turn to Nile or Linda

02:33:44 Speaker 08: to to help with this as

02:33:51 Speaker 08: well, I think in terms of

02:33:56 Speaker 08: the projects that we've we've we've

02:33:59 Speaker 08: seen in terms of some of

02:34:00 Speaker 08: that seed funding being provided to

02:34:02 Speaker 08: to various projects, it's. it's around

02:34:03 Speaker 08: the whole opportunities to adapt to

02:34:05 Speaker 08: some of our our weather our

02:34:09 Speaker 08: changing climate and and opportunities to

02:34:11 Speaker 08: look for how how we might

02:34:12 Speaker 08: be able to use technologies or

02:34:17 Speaker 08: use different different approaches to be

02:34:20 Speaker 08: able to adapt. So it's it's

02:34:23 Speaker 10: it's may and some of that

02:34:23 Speaker 10: may be also to in terms

02:34:26 Speaker 10: of just further sustainable farming practices

02:34:28 Speaker 10: and experiment. Farming practices and experimenting

02:34:30 Speaker 10: with some of those those pieces.

02:34:35 Speaker 10: So, so I'd say it's it's

02:34:37 Speaker 10: definitely in line with what the

02:34:40 Speaker 10: overall kind of climate change umbrella.

02:34:44 Speaker 10: When you look at it from

02:34:45 Speaker 10: both a mitigation and an adaptation

02:34:48 Speaker 10: perspective, the the projects are are

02:34:50 Speaker 10: definitely in alignment with some of

02:34:51 Speaker 10: the actions that are identified in

02:34:52 Speaker 10: going green and gray with respect

02:34:54 Speaker 10: with respect to the agricultural aspects.

02:34:57 Speaker 10: And I guess if I might,

02:34:59 Speaker 10: if you. indulge the chair for

02:35:01 Speaker 10: a minute, I might tell you

02:35:04 Speaker 10: a little story. Some of you,

02:35:07 Speaker 10: some of you, might have heard

02:35:09 Speaker 10: me say this before, but Gray

02:35:11 Speaker 10: County and Bruce, to an extent

02:35:13 Speaker 10: as well, still maintains a lot

02:35:15 Speaker 10: of the legacy infrastructure on our

02:35:18 Speaker 10: farms. We still have basically 100-acre

02:35:19 Speaker 10: lots. They're split up into 10,

02:35:21 Speaker 10: 25, 30-acre pieces. But it's all

02:35:23 Speaker 10: essentially there. It's been there for

02:35:25 Speaker 10: a lot of years. People are

02:35:27 Speaker 10: moving into our area and buying

02:35:28 Speaker 10: up hundred acre parcels that have

02:35:30 Speaker 10: no background in agriculture. Essentially, they

02:35:32 Speaker 10: don't know what they don't know.

02:35:35 Speaker 10: There are some of us, myself

02:35:37 Speaker 10: included, Councillor Eccles, McQueen. There may

02:35:38 Speaker 10: be others that have farmed all

02:35:39 Speaker 10: our lives. We'd never consider doing

02:35:41 Speaker 10: any of the things that have

02:35:41 Speaker 10: been in experimental acres because, just,

02:35:43 Speaker 10: I just wouldn't because I probably

02:35:46 Speaker 10: don't know. if it would work,

02:35:48 Speaker 10: and I just wouldn't. It's not

02:35:52 Speaker 10: what I do. But there are

02:36:00 Speaker 63: people that are willing to go

02:36:04 Speaker 63: out on a limb and try

02:36:05 Speaker 63: stuff because they don't know what

02:36:16 Speaker 63: they don't know. And if some

02:36:21 Speaker 63: of that experimental stuff works, then

02:36:23 Speaker 25: maybe the rest of us take

02:36:30 Speaker 49: a second look at it and

02:36:32 Speaker 49: say, well, maybe that would work

02:36:36 Speaker 49: on my farm. So it's it's

02:36:38 Speaker 64: not so much about going green,

02:36:42 Speaker 64: although there's an element of that

02:36:43 Speaker 64: in it. It's about what's what

02:36:46 Speaker 64: will help sustain agriculture in Gray

02:36:49 Speaker 10: County, specifically, if not the rest

02:36:52 Speaker 10: of the province? So, just a

02:36:53 Speaker 10: little bit of a, I don't

02:36:54 Speaker 10: know if that's a story or

02:36:56 Speaker 10: not, but anyway, I'll, I'll stop

02:36:58 Speaker 10: there. Anybody else have any other

02:36:59 Speaker 10: thoughts? If not, I'll call the

02:37:01 Speaker 10: vote. An affirmative vote would retain

02:37:03 Speaker 10: it out of the budget. A

02:37:04 Speaker 10: no vote would put it back

02:37:06 Speaker 10: into the draft budget. Okay. All

02:37:08 Speaker 10: the all those in favour, remove

02:37:11 Speaker 10: it. Go ahead. What's your point

02:37:12 Speaker 10: of order? Just if you could

02:37:15 Speaker 10: please explain that further, because the

02:37:17 Speaker 10: motion is an approval of the

02:37:18 Speaker 10: committee minute, the minute recommendation. So

02:37:20 Speaker 10: a yay should be approving the

02:37:23 Speaker 10: minutes forthcoming from committee. Correct. Sorry,

02:37:25 Speaker 10: maybe I stated it reverse. I

02:37:28 Speaker 10: apologize. So, an affirmative vote would

02:37:30 Speaker 10: sustain the recommendation from the committee,

02:37:31 Speaker 10: and no vote would overturn that

02:37:33 Speaker 10: recommendation. Okay, we all understand that.

02:37:34 Speaker 10: Now that the chair's got it

02:37:36 Speaker 10: through his thick skull, I'll call

02:37:37 Speaker 10: the vote. All those in favour?

02:37:39 Speaker 10: Those opposed? That motion fails. Okay.

02:37:41 Speaker 10: Now, thank you, Mary Lou. Now

02:37:43 Speaker 10: on to number four: the staff

02:37:46 Speaker 10: repair report on the implications of

02:37:47 Speaker 10: removing the Go and Green and

02:37:48 Speaker 10: Gray initiative for the consideration of

02:37:51 Speaker 10: the 2027 budget. Councillor Nielsen. Thank

02:37:53 Speaker 10: you very much, Stephanie Warren. I

02:37:56 Speaker 10: do want to move an amendment

02:37:57 Speaker 10: to this one. I understand the

02:37:59 Speaker 10: the premise of trying to get

02:38:01 Speaker 10: my red light, Tom. I understand

02:38:07 Speaker 10: the premise of trying to get

02:38:09 Speaker 10: more information. from staff, and I

02:38:11 Speaker 10: think the way we word

02:38:14 Speaker 65: direction to staff and the way

02:38:16 Speaker 65: we word the motion influences the

02:38:18 Speaker 65: data that we receive back from

02:38:19 Speaker 65: staff. And so, in this situation,

02:38:20 Speaker 65: I think the motion's words wouldn't

02:38:25 Speaker 65: actually get the right data back

02:38:27 Speaker 65: to this body to make an

02:38:30 Speaker 65: informed decision. You are preempting the

02:38:33 Speaker 65: decision, and you are giving direction

02:38:35 Speaker 65: to staff to bring a specific.

02:38:37 Speaker 65: set of data, so I'd like

02:38:39 Speaker 65: to make an amendment to the

02:38:41 Speaker 65: motion to remove the words implications

02:38:44 Speaker 65: of removing the Going Green and

02:38:47 Speaker 65: Gray initiative for the consideration of

02:38:48 Speaker 65: the budget, and insert, bring back

02:38:52 Speaker 65: a report on an updated review

02:38:54 Speaker 65: of the targets established in Going

02:38:57 Speaker 65: Green and Gray for the presented

02:38:59 Speaker 65: to be presented prior to the

02:39:01 Speaker 65: budget, and the difference here is

02:39:04 Speaker 65: what we need to do is

02:39:06 Speaker 65: have an actual discussion on the.

02:39:08 Speaker 65: merits, the successes, the challenges of

02:39:11 Speaker 65: going green and gray. Where do

02:39:15 Speaker 65: we need to pivot and put

02:39:17 Speaker 65: energy into? Where do we need

02:39:20 Speaker 65: to put it? Pivot and maybe

02:39:22 Speaker 65: invest more funds into it, rather

02:39:25 Speaker 65: than asking staff for the report

02:39:27 Speaker 65: that says we're pulling out regardless

02:39:28 Speaker 65: of what the data says. And

02:39:30 Speaker 65: there is a difference in terms

02:39:31 Speaker 65: of what that report will bring

02:39:34 Speaker 65: back. And so that's why they've

02:39:36 Speaker 65: removed that amendment. Thank you, sir.

02:39:38 Speaker 65: Is there a seconder for that?

02:39:40 Speaker 65: Councillor Dubreuil will second that motion

02:39:44 Speaker 65: on the amendment. is there any

02:39:46 Speaker 65: discussion, Councillor Apple? s I'm not

02:39:48 Speaker 65: clear on what that was. There

02:39:51 Speaker 65: was, what is? Can we get

02:39:53 Speaker 65: it up on the screen? Can

02:39:57 Speaker 65: everyone see that on their screen?

02:40:01 Speaker 65: okay, Councillor Apples, you're good with

02:40:04 Speaker 65: that, or are you under? Sorry,

02:40:06 Speaker 65: yes. If the amendment succeeds, then

02:40:08 Speaker 65: we'll we'll also put up the

02:40:10 Speaker 65: the amended motion. But for now,

02:40:13 Speaker 65: it's the amendment that's on the

02:40:15 Speaker 65: screen. Councillor Nielsen, thank you very

02:40:16 Speaker 65: much, Deputy Warden. Just for more

02:40:19 Speaker 65: clarity, for my. friends across the

02:40:21 Speaker 65: aisle. The premise here is, we

02:40:22 Speaker 65: need we need to receive a

02:40:25 Speaker 65: report on how going green and

02:40:29 Speaker 65: gray is working. It was established

02:40:30 Speaker 65: in 2022. My understanding from discussions

02:40:33 Speaker 65: with staff is that there is

02:40:36 Speaker 65: already an intent from staff to

02:40:44 Speaker 65: bring back a review of this

02:40:46 Speaker 65: programme, as we should with all

02:40:48 Speaker 66: big policy and big programmeming that

02:40:53 Speaker 66: the county puts on. The difference

02:40:57 Speaker 66: here is what we're asking staff

02:40:59 Speaker 09: to bring back. The motion that

02:41:00 Speaker 09: came out of the budget and

02:41:06 Speaker 09: finance committee. gives direction from two

02:41:10 Speaker 09: staff to bring back a report

02:41:13 Speaker 09: on removing us from going green,

02:41:17 Speaker 09: green and grey, without actually asking:

02:41:20 Speaker 09: Is it being successful? Are we

02:41:24 Speaker 09: seeing benefits? Is the investment coming

02:41:27 Speaker 09: in with to fruition? Is there

02:41:31 Speaker 09: certain aspects of going green and

02:41:34 Speaker 09: grey that maybe aren't working, but

02:41:36 Speaker 09: certain other ones are, and we

02:41:38 Speaker 09: should pivot our investment into those

02:41:44 Speaker 09: areas? The motion coming out of

02:41:47 Speaker 09: the Budget and Finance Committee is

02:41:49 Speaker 09: strictly remove it from the 2027

02:41:52 Speaker 09: budget, and to me, that is

02:41:55 Speaker 09: not getting the information. this county

02:41:58 Speaker 09: actually needs. So my motion is

02:42:00 Speaker 09: to change that direction and have

02:42:03 Speaker 09: staff bring back a clear direction

02:42:05 Speaker 09: and a clear report on the

02:42:07 Speaker 09: Folsom going green and gray, so

02:42:10 Speaker 09: that council then can make an

02:42:13 Speaker 09: informed decision on whether or not

02:42:14 Speaker 09: there's merits of changing the amount

02:42:17 Speaker 09: of investment we are making into

02:42:20 Speaker 09: this action. Councillor Gregg, I will

02:42:27 Speaker 09: oppose the changing of the wording.

02:42:28 Speaker 09: The the actual wording implication. The

02:42:30 Speaker 09: actual wording implications is appropriate because

02:42:33 Speaker 09: right now we have two positions

02:42:35 Speaker 09: which are grant funded. We are

02:42:38 Speaker 09: undertaking, and this is part of

02:42:40 Speaker 09: the conversation that we had at

02:42:41 Speaker 09: budget meeting. It initially was just

02:42:42 Speaker 09: to reflect the 2026 budget, and

02:42:45 Speaker 09: through discussion, we realized the conversation

02:42:46 Speaker 09: is so broad. There's it's multifaceted

02:42:50 Speaker 09: that we've got national grant funding

02:42:53 Speaker 09: programmemes that we're leveraging for EV

02:42:56 Speaker 09: charging stations. We've got partners that

02:42:58 Speaker 09: we've been working. with and the

02:43:00 Speaker 09: establishment of building standards, so we

02:43:03 Speaker 09: have some of these positions that

02:43:06 Speaker 09: right now are rate funded, not

02:43:11 Speaker 09: levy funded. They have a fixed

02:43:18 Speaker 09: funding date at this time. So

02:43:19 Speaker 09: I think for that reason, an

02:43:22 Speaker 09: updated review of the targets is

02:43:24 Speaker 09: not sufficient when you're actually wanting

02:43:26 Speaker 09: to reflect the intent of the

02:43:29 Speaker 09: the report coming forward. It's not

02:43:31 Speaker 08: automatically to remove it from the

02:43:34 Speaker 08: 2027 budget. it's a report back

02:43:37 Speaker 08: to council on the implications, and

02:43:40 Speaker 08: one of those implications, and it's

02:43:41 Speaker 08: not a target. One of the

02:43:43 Speaker 08: implications could be we've lost that

02:43:45 Speaker 08: revenue, that grant funding stream. So

02:43:47 Speaker 08: the implication now is it's going

02:44:15 Speaker 08: to fall onto the levy because

02:44:17 Speaker 08: someone's going to pay for it.

02:44:19 Speaker 67: And as a council, now you're

02:44:20 Speaker 60: having a whole different discussion about

02:44:22 Speaker 60: the report than you're going to

02:44:25 Speaker 60: have when you're just having an.

02:44:26 Speaker 60: updated review of the targets because

02:44:29 Speaker 60: an updated review of the targets.

02:44:30 Speaker 60: That's almost a subjective, warm and

02:44:33 Speaker 60: cozy feeling about you know, do

02:44:34 Speaker 60: we like how much we've done?

02:44:37 Speaker 60: Could we do more? Yes. Is

02:44:38 Speaker 60: that good enough? Probably, maybe not.

02:44:41 Speaker 60: We don't know. But implications reflects

02:44:43 Speaker 60: better, and there is nothing that

02:44:46 Speaker 60: beholds the council to the removal.

02:44:48 Speaker 60: So to the removal or the

02:44:51 Speaker 60: continuation of it in the budget

02:44:54 Speaker 60: for 2027. At that point,

02:44:56 Speaker 60: you know, I could move for

02:45:00 Speaker 60: a budget that we buy cameras

02:45:02 Speaker 60: and put them over the highways

02:45:04 Speaker 60: so we have real-time camera for

02:45:07 Speaker 60: people for the public to go

02:45:08 Speaker 60: on and look at our roads.

02:45:10 Speaker 60: In you know, you as councillors,

02:45:11 Speaker 60: you can move anything, but a

02:45:19 Speaker 60: review of the targets does isn't

02:45:21 Speaker 60: as fulsome as the initial intent

02:45:22 Speaker 60: of that. reporting back should be,

02:45:25 Speaker 60: Councillor Dubreuil, please. Thank you, and

02:45:29 Speaker 60: through you to the to the

02:45:33 Speaker 60: question and to the original recommendation.

02:45:37 Speaker 09: The way it is worded implies

02:45:41 Speaker 09: that the Budget and Finance Committee

02:45:43 Speaker 09: is recommending we exit green and

02:45:46 Speaker 09: gray. I listened to the meeting,

02:45:49 Speaker 09: and. the wording is to bring

02:45:53 Speaker 09: back a report that specifically addresses

02:45:55 Speaker 09: the implications of exiting, going green

02:46:00 Speaker 09: and grey. It does not necessarily

02:46:03 Speaker 09: include a progress report on the

02:46:04 Speaker 09: successes of going green and grey.

02:46:07 Speaker 09: And my understanding was that staff

02:46:10 Speaker 09: always intended to councillor Nielsen's point.

02:46:13 Speaker 09: Lars Nielsen's point earlier, that staff

02:46:16 Speaker 09: would be bringing a progress report

02:46:18 Speaker 09: on going green and gray. It's

02:46:21 Speaker 09: a policy set by this body,

02:46:23 Speaker 68: and that progress report would allow

02:46:25 Speaker 68: us to have the information to

02:46:27 Speaker 68: determine whether or not we proceed,

02:46:29 Speaker 68: whether or not we stay with

02:46:32 Speaker 68: the status quo, or maybe we

02:46:33 Speaker 68: scale it back. But to bring

02:46:40 Speaker 68: a report. that only provides the

02:46:43 Speaker 68: implications of exiting, going green and

02:46:45 Speaker 68: gray doesn't give us a full

02:46:47 Speaker 38: picture or all of the information.

02:46:51 Speaker 38: So I understand the motion that

02:46:52 Speaker 38: Councillor Nielsen is putting forward is

02:46:54 Speaker 38: to review the targets established, but

02:46:56 Speaker 38: I don't think it goes far

02:46:57 Speaker 38: enough. Even then, I I. I'm

02:46:59 Speaker 38: not I'm not sure that I

02:47:02 Speaker 38: have a question or an. amendment

02:47:03 Speaker 38: at this time. I just think

02:47:05 Speaker 38: that that allowing the progress report

02:47:06 Speaker 38: to proceed as it was originally

02:47:07 Speaker 38: intended, so that we have the

02:47:09 Speaker 38: information, and at that point in

02:47:10 Speaker 38: time we can decide whether or

02:47:12 Speaker 38: not this is a programme that

02:47:14 Speaker 38: we want to continue. I guess

02:47:16 Speaker 38: my actually I do have a

02:47:18 Speaker 38: question through Deputy Warden. Does the

02:47:20 Speaker 38: Budget and Finance Committee, in its

02:47:23 Speaker 38: terms of reference, allow for them

02:47:25 Speaker 38: to or is it within their

02:47:26 Speaker 38: purview to make recommendations to exit

02:47:29 Speaker 38: a policy that was set by

02:47:32 Speaker 38: this by this body, regardless of

02:47:35 Speaker 38: whether it's a financial, the financial

02:47:36 Speaker 38: piece, the budget piece. I guess

02:47:38 Speaker 38: I would say, as chair of

02:47:40 Speaker 38: that particular committee, lucky me. I

02:47:41 Speaker 38: would say that the the committee

02:47:43 Speaker 38: has not. actually put forward the

02:47:46 Speaker 38: motion to exit the programme. The

02:47:48 Speaker 38: motion, as Councillor Greg rightly pointed

02:47:49 Speaker 38: out, the motion that was supported

02:47:52 Speaker 38: was to request a report on

02:47:54 Speaker 38: the implications of leaving the programme.

02:47:56 Speaker 38: And in that respect, I think

02:47:58 Speaker 38: the committee is within their purview.

02:47:59 Speaker 38: Although I'll defer to the clerk

02:48:02 Speaker 38: or the CEO on that particular

02:48:03 Speaker 38: matter. Thank you, Tara, and and

02:48:06 Speaker 38: and through you, Deputy Warden. Uh,

02:48:07 Speaker 38: so just looking at the terms

02:48:11 Speaker 38: of reference, just uh outline the

02:48:12 Speaker 38: scope of responsibility for the budget

02:48:14 Speaker 38: and finance. Committee shall include providing

02:48:16 Speaker 38: input in the creation of the

02:48:19 Speaker 38: county's first multi-year operating budget, that

02:48:20 Speaker 38: was of course in context of

02:48:22 Speaker 38: last year, reviewing the draft operating

02:48:24 Speaker 38: capital budget documents prior to preparation

02:48:25 Speaker 38: of the budget package for council,

02:48:27 Speaker 38: reviewing operating capital budget reports on

02:48:28 Speaker 38: a quarterly basis, recommending the annual

02:48:30 Speaker 38: schedule for capital and operating budget

02:48:33 Speaker 38: preparation and presentation for council approval,

02:48:34 Speaker 38: reviewing financial and fiscal policies, practices,

02:48:38 Speaker 38: and procedures as required. review reports

02:48:39 Speaker 38: with significant financial focus, such as

02:48:41 Speaker 38: development charges revenue, development charges background

02:48:43 Speaker 38: study, investment revenue, reserve fund studies,

02:48:47 Speaker 38: and review the strategic asset management

02:48:50 Speaker 38: plan and policies, and make recommendations

02:48:52 Speaker 38: to council. So that's the list

02:48:54 Speaker 38: of the scope of responsibility with

02:48:56 Speaker 38: respect to the budget finance committee.

02:48:58 Speaker 38: It's part of the terms of

02:49:00 Speaker 22: reference. So I would suggest. that

02:49:03 Speaker 22: yes, they're within their purview to

02:49:05 Speaker 22: put forward the motion that is

02:49:10 Speaker 22: on the floor, or the original

02:49:11 Speaker 22: motion, Councillor Debrine. So I suppose

02:49:14 Speaker 22: that my my question is more

02:49:16 Speaker 22: to: Is this original motion tainting

02:49:18 Speaker 22: the report to only include the

02:49:19 Speaker 22: implications of exiting going green and

02:49:20 Speaker 22: gray, as opposed to a progress

02:49:22 Speaker 22: report on the benefits? the progress

02:49:24 Speaker 22: to date, and recommendations at that

02:49:25 Speaker 22: point in time of whether or

02:49:27 Speaker 22: not to continue with our trajectory

02:49:28 Speaker 22: or scale back or remove. My

02:49:34 Speaker 22: concern is that this is too

02:49:36 Speaker 22: limiting a focus for staff, in

02:49:39 Speaker 22: that the this body will not

02:49:40 Speaker 22: get a fulsome picture of going

02:49:42 Speaker 60: green and gray and its progress.

02:49:44 Speaker 60: I guess in response, I would

02:49:46 Speaker 60: say that budget ultimately is always

02:49:49 Speaker 60: a decision of council, and the

02:49:53 Speaker 60: budget and committee, or budget and

02:49:54 Speaker 60: finance committee, is simply an advisory

02:49:56 Speaker 60: committee to make recommendations, and that's

02:49:58 Speaker 60: what they've done. Okay, Councillor Mackey

02:50:00 Speaker 60: is next, and then I have

02:50:03 Speaker 60: Councillor McQueen, and then Councillor Carlton.

02:50:04 Speaker 60: Thank you, Deputy Warden. Yeah, I'm

02:50:06 Speaker 60: I'm torn on the on the.

02:50:08 Speaker 60: wording too because there is the

02:50:10 Speaker 60: implication of actually removing a cost-benefit

02:50:13 Speaker 60: analysis on any programme that we

02:50:14 Speaker 60: have. I think is important. I'm

02:50:17 Speaker 60: not sure right now what benefits

02:50:19 Speaker 60: we are getting. I know what

02:50:22 Speaker 60: the costs are. I know there's

02:50:24 Speaker 60: an affordability crisis out there. We're

02:50:28 Speaker 60: all dealing with our lower-tier budgets,

02:50:30 Speaker 60: and we're putting off work because

02:50:31 Speaker 60: we can't afford to do it.

02:50:34 Speaker 60: So roads aren't getting done because

02:50:37 Speaker 60: we got we got to keep

02:50:40 Speaker 60: a tax rate you know below

02:50:43 Speaker 60: a certain percent because people can't

02:50:46 Speaker 60: afford a huge one. We know

02:50:48 Speaker 60: we're at six point nine percent

02:50:50 Speaker 60: right now, and budget and finance

02:50:51 Speaker 60: was tasked with looking at ways

02:50:54 Speaker 60: to reduce that. I pay a

02:50:56 Speaker 60: lot of income tax to the

02:50:58 Speaker 60: government. I pay a lot to

02:50:59 Speaker 60: the Ontario government. All who have

02:51:03 Speaker 60: climate change initiatives, property taxes continue

02:51:05 Speaker 60: to go up. You know, probably

02:51:08 Speaker 60: at a rate higher than any

02:51:09 Speaker 60: of us would like. And I

02:51:12 Speaker 60: hear from a number of seniors,

02:51:13 Speaker 60: and not not just seniors, but

02:51:14 Speaker 60: people in general. that can't afford

02:51:16 Speaker 60: these significant tax increases. So it's

02:51:18 Speaker 60: difficult to try and reduce any

02:51:20 Speaker 60: programme because there's merits to all

02:51:22 Speaker 60: the programmemes that we have throughout

02:51:24 Speaker 60: the county. But as Councillor Aclo

02:51:26 Speaker 60: said, there is our lane to

02:51:30 Speaker 60: stay within. And you know what

02:51:32 Speaker 60: are we supposed to be doing?

02:51:34 Speaker 60: We have social services, we have

02:51:35 Speaker 60: ambulance, we have bridges, we have

02:51:36 Speaker 60: roads, we have lots of mandatory

02:51:37 Speaker 60: long-term care. We have lots of

02:51:39 Speaker 60: mandatory services that continue to require.

02:51:42 Speaker 60: more and more funds. We hear

02:51:43 Speaker 60: about the downloading from the problems.

02:51:48 Speaker 60: Yes, that's happening all the time.

02:51:51 Speaker 60: We can't control that. Going green

02:51:55 Speaker 60: and gray is one thing that

02:51:56 Speaker 60: we have some control over. So

02:51:57 Speaker 60: knowing if that programme is working

02:51:58 Speaker 60: when we are spending a lot

02:52:00 Speaker 60: of money, and I do know

02:52:02 Speaker 22: that we will be spending more

02:52:03 Speaker 22: and more as we get deeper

02:52:05 Speaker 22: into that programme. So that's why

02:52:07 Speaker 22: I think a thorough review of

02:52:09 Speaker 22: going green and gray is necessary.

02:52:11 Speaker 22: You know, to look. after the

02:52:12 Speaker 22: best interest of our tax code.

02:52:13 Speaker 22: There's one person paying the tab,

02:52:14 Speaker 22: and someone can't afford it. Thank

02:52:16 Speaker 22: you. Thank you, sir. Councillor McQueen

02:52:17 Speaker 22: is next. I don't disagree with

02:52:19 Speaker 22: Councillor Mackey in the sense of

02:52:21 Speaker 22: taxes and keeping them down, and

02:52:23 Speaker 22: I I just wonder. This is

02:52:25 Speaker 22: a question to the amended motion

02:52:28 Speaker 22: that should it say also the

02:52:29 Speaker 22: targets establishment, growing, going green and

02:52:31 Speaker 22: gray, and also a financial model

02:52:34 Speaker 22: presented. Model be presented, or the

02:52:36 Speaker 22: financial, the financials of it, or

02:52:37 Speaker 22: or the or the funding. However,

02:52:41 Speaker 22: going to my colleague, Councillor Greg,

02:52:42 Speaker 22: and you mentioned about the funding

02:52:44 Speaker 22: and some of that. I think

02:52:45 Speaker 22: it would be good for us

02:52:47 Speaker 22: to have that information in that

02:52:48 Speaker 22: report, or maybe it's maybe it

02:52:49 Speaker 22: would come back in that report.

02:52:52 Speaker 22: It doesn't need to be in

02:52:54 Speaker 22: the motion. I'm asking for clarity

02:52:58 Speaker 22: on that part. Thank you, and

02:53:00 Speaker 22: through you, Deputy Warden. with respect

02:53:02 Speaker 69: to and so since since obviously,

02:53:04 Speaker 70: Budget and Finance Committee staff have

02:53:06 Speaker 70: had a chance to take a

02:53:09 Speaker 70: look at some of the previous

02:53:12 Speaker 70: motions passed by Council with respect

02:53:14 Speaker 70: to when the first going green

02:53:15 Speaker 70: and grey plan was was first

02:53:17 Speaker 70: established, and I'll just read the

02:53:20 Speaker 70: one motion that that was passed

02:53:22 Speaker 70: in 2022 that the climate change

02:53:24 Speaker 70: action plan and a net zero

02:53:26 Speaker 70: greenhouse gas emissions target by 2050

02:53:28 Speaker 70: be endorsed to help guide corporate

02:53:31 Speaker 70: strategic plans. and priorities, and that

02:53:35 Speaker 70: staff also be directed to explore

02:53:37 Speaker 70: more aggressive corporate target dates and

02:53:38 Speaker 70: bring updated target reviews each term

02:53:41 Speaker 70: of council. So, in order to

02:53:42 Speaker 70: inform each term of council, as

02:53:45 Speaker 70: part of some of the work

02:53:47 Speaker 70: plan considerations for 2026, based on

02:53:49 Speaker 70: based on staff discussions, we would

02:53:52 Speaker 70: be bringing forward a review of

02:53:55 Speaker 70: of the of the overall programme.

02:54:01 Speaker 02: As part of that overall programme,

02:54:04 Speaker 02: we'd be looking at the financial

02:54:06 Speaker 02: Programme would be looking at the

02:54:11 Speaker 56: financial aspects with respect to the

02:54:14 Speaker 56: overall programme, where there's there's where

02:54:18 Speaker 56: we've seen some some great success,

02:54:21 Speaker 56: where there's opportunity to maybe tweak

02:54:23 Speaker 56: some some some items, where there's

02:54:24 Speaker 56: maybe some further emphasis that should

02:54:30 Speaker 56: be provided in certain areas, based

02:54:31 Speaker 56: on where we have seen some

02:54:38 Speaker 56: more success than maybe other areas.

02:54:40 Speaker 56: So that would be part of

02:54:42 Speaker 56: that work plan, anyways, as part

02:54:48 Speaker 56: of the progress report based on

02:54:49 Speaker 56: that previous motion. and so so

02:54:51 Speaker 56: with that, I think in terms

02:54:54 Speaker 56: of the reviewing the overall target

02:54:57 Speaker 56: reviews is looking at the overall

02:55:00 Speaker 56: progress of of that prior to

02:55:03 Speaker 56: the next term of council. In

02:55:05 Speaker 56: order to do that, the work

02:55:06 Speaker 56: has to be done in 2026

02:55:09 Speaker 56: in order to inform what that

02:55:11 Speaker 56: may look like from a financial

02:55:15 Speaker 56: perspective and what's included as part

02:55:17 Speaker 56: of the work plans going forward

02:55:18 Speaker 56: in 2027 and 2028 to help

02:55:21 Speaker 56: inform those proposed budgets. So so

02:55:22 Speaker 56: that's where again, upon further reflection,

02:55:24 Speaker 56: staff looked at some of those

02:55:27 Speaker 56: pieces. We've looked at then. This

02:55:30 Speaker 56: is something that we would already

02:55:35 Speaker 56: have to do as part of

02:55:39 Speaker 56: the work plan. It's part of

02:55:41 Speaker 56: the previous direction from council, and

02:55:45 Speaker 56: and so that's something that I

02:55:48 Speaker 56: think would be part of that

02:55:52 Speaker 56: review coming forward, unless again, otherwise,

02:55:55 Speaker 56: as further directed by County Council.

02:56:00 Speaker 56: You, Mister Deputy Warden, thank you

02:56:02 Speaker 56: for that clarity because then we

02:56:07 Speaker 56: don't have to add more words.

02:56:10 Speaker 56: I just need that. More words

02:56:14 Speaker 56: that just need that clear. Just

02:56:16 Speaker 56: one other comment I do want

02:56:21 Speaker 56: to make was when I became

02:56:25 Speaker 56: warden in December of 2019. One

02:56:26 Speaker 56: of the first things I brought

02:56:30 Speaker 56: forward was the suggestion of creating

02:56:33 Speaker 56: a climate change committee in this

02:56:35 Speaker 56: body, and it was it was

02:56:37 Speaker 56: endorsed. And we started. That's where

02:56:41 Speaker 56: we sort of started. I know

02:56:43 Speaker 56: some of those that were maybe

02:56:44 Speaker 56: back that time, and that was

02:56:48 Speaker 56: sort of the start of us

02:56:50 Speaker 56: looking at climate change as a

02:56:51 Speaker 56: as a county council and and

02:56:53 Speaker 56: all that stuff, and sort of

02:56:55 Speaker 56: transferred to maybe where you're talking

02:56:57 Speaker 56: about. Mr. Ciel and that sort

02:57:02 Speaker 56: of thing, but I mean this

02:57:04 Speaker 56: body has sort of has has

02:57:07 Speaker 56: endorsed the the concept of looking

02:57:13 Speaker 56: at it right back to that

02:57:15 Speaker 56: days of of those committees and

02:57:17 Speaker 56: that committee went through 2020, and

02:57:22 Speaker 56: you know what happened in 2020,

02:57:25 Speaker 56: but it still stayed the course.

02:57:29 Speaker 56: I mean, COVID hit and we

02:57:31 Speaker 56: had to beer off and stuff

02:57:34 Speaker 56: like that, but we certainly started.

02:57:37 Speaker 56: That's where it started with the

02:57:40 Speaker 56: committee and recommendations that came forward.

02:57:42 Speaker 56: So thank you, Mr. Deputy. Work,

02:57:43 Speaker 56: Councillor Carlton. Thank you, Deputy Warden,

02:57:45 Speaker 56: and I think our CAO answered

02:57:47 Speaker 56: part of my concern is that

02:57:59 Speaker 56: we're putting a motion on the

02:58:01 Speaker 56: floor that was already dealt with

02:58:02 Speaker 56: through the original plan to do

02:58:03 Speaker 56: those progress updates as we went

02:58:06 Speaker 65: forward, and I think we're circumventing

02:58:10 Speaker 65: that report and trying to focus

02:58:11 Speaker 65: it in a direction maybe it

02:58:13 Speaker 65: wasn't intended to go. My second

02:58:17 Speaker 65: comment would relate to comments about

02:58:18 Speaker 65: what our role is here. at

02:58:19 Speaker 02: the county, and I think it's

02:58:21 Speaker 02: a two-part. We have a role

02:58:23 Speaker 02: to manage things for the better

02:58:24 Speaker 02: of our residents now with what's

02:58:29 Speaker 02: needed now, but we also have

02:58:32 Speaker 02: a role to play in planning

02:58:34 Speaker 02: for their future and ensuring that

02:58:36 Speaker 02: the future is going to be

02:58:37 Speaker 02: one that's affordable. And I think

02:58:39 Speaker 02: being aware of climate change and

02:58:40 Speaker 02: what needs to happen there is

02:58:42 Speaker 71: important. I'll end with that. Thank

02:58:44 Speaker 71: you, Councillor Carleton. Any other discussion,

02:58:46 Speaker 71: Councillor Eccles, and then Councillor Debrine.

02:58:48 Speaker 71: Thank you, Mr. Warden. Today, I

02:58:51 Speaker 71: guess I'm reading this a lot

02:58:52 Speaker 71: different. The implications of removing and

02:58:54 Speaker 71: getting dealing just with the amendment.

02:58:56 Speaker 71: The implications of removing when I

02:58:58 Speaker 71: voted for this and whatnot. was

02:59:00 Speaker 71: pretty much what Randy had said

02:59:01 Speaker 71: there a few minutes ago, Mr.

02:59:04 Speaker 71: CEO. It's not about yes, what

02:59:08 Speaker 71: implications or what's going to happen

02:59:10 Speaker 71: if this was removed. Out, I

02:59:12 Speaker 71: could go with fine. Let's change

02:59:13 Speaker 71: the word and say the implications

02:59:15 Speaker 71: of maintaining going in green. It's

02:59:16 Speaker 71: one of the other. You're going.

02:59:18 Speaker 71: One or the other. You're going

02:59:19 Speaker 71: to have to. I would expect,

02:59:21 Speaker 71: and I had expected staff to

02:59:22 Speaker 71: do the implications of removing. We're

02:59:26 Speaker 71: going to lose, you know, some

02:59:27 Speaker 71: of the targets, whatever the target

02:59:29 Speaker 71: was. If we remove it, we

02:59:31 Speaker 71: may not, you know, we're not

02:59:33 Speaker 71: going to have it. And to

02:59:34 Speaker 71: get to that point, I think

02:59:36 Speaker 71: we got. It's the understanding, and

02:59:37 Speaker 71: my understanding of it was to

02:59:38 Speaker 71: give us a report. If we

02:59:40 Speaker 71: remove it, yeah, this is going

02:59:41 Speaker 71: to happen. It's going to have

02:59:42 Speaker 71: this implication on the budget. It's

02:59:44 Speaker 71: going to have implications of where

02:59:46 Speaker 71: we, you know, got to going

02:59:48 Speaker 71: green and gray. But it's not

02:59:56 Speaker 71: about just the report. Would be

02:59:57 Speaker 71: very limited if it was just

02:59:59 Speaker 71: about the financial or the impact

03:00:03 Speaker 72: of removing. The impact of remove—it's

03:00:04 Speaker 72: got to be what we would

03:00:06 Speaker 72: lose as well. So the idea

03:00:07 Speaker 72: of this amendment, the amendments—I think—changing

03:00:10 Speaker 72: it altogether. It's just focusing in

03:00:11 Speaker 72: on review of the targets. I

03:00:12 Speaker 72: want a full review, a full

03:00:14 Speaker 72: of what this means with this

03:00:15 Speaker 72: programme. If we remove it. yeah,

03:00:18 Speaker 72: we're going to gain this, this,

03:00:20 Speaker 72: and this. Possibly, financially, whatever. But

03:00:23 Speaker 72: if we remove it, we're going

03:00:24 Speaker 72: to lose this, this, and this.

03:00:25 Speaker 72: Would be in the report. So

03:00:27 Speaker 72: the thought that this motion is

03:00:30 Speaker 72: saying, oh, we're only going to

03:00:32 Speaker 72: find out what, you know, the

03:00:34 Speaker 72: bad part. No, the report. I

03:00:35 Speaker 72: would hope that staff will bring

03:00:38 Speaker 72: it to. us with all of

03:00:43 Speaker 72: the data. If it makes you

03:00:44 Speaker 72: feel better, I'm not going to

03:00:45 Speaker 72: vote for the amendment. I'm going

03:00:49 Speaker 72: to oppose it because I think

03:00:50 Speaker 72: it changes. It's not an amendment;

03:00:54 Speaker 72: it just changes the whole motion.

03:00:55 Speaker 72: I would put forward a amendment.

03:00:59 Speaker 14: If whatever happens with this one,

03:01:03 Speaker 14: I would put forward fine. The

03:01:06 Speaker 14: implications of maintaining. Because it may

03:01:09 Speaker 09: come out that maintaining going in

03:01:11 Speaker 09: green is going to do us

03:01:13 Speaker 09: wonderful things, and projected that we'll

03:01:19 Speaker 09: be saving the county millions of

03:01:22 Speaker 09: dollars. But one way or the

03:01:22 Speaker 09: other, it's just a word. the

03:01:27 Speaker 09: The report should be wholesome, full,

03:01:28 Speaker 09: and be going on both sides.

03:01:30 Speaker 09: And what Randy had said. and

03:01:33 Speaker 73: that was said in the committee

03:01:36 Speaker 73: that yes, there would be a

03:01:38 Speaker 73: report. I think this is just

03:01:40 Speaker 73: making sure that that doesn't get

03:01:42 Speaker 10: lost. Councillor Dubreuil. Point of order

03:01:43 Speaker 10: is that the member has already

03:01:44 Speaker 10: spoken to the amended motion on

03:01:46 Speaker 10: the floor once, as per our

03:01:48 Speaker 10: procedural bylaw. Unless there's indulgence, that

03:01:50 Speaker 10: council speak more so. Okay. I'll

03:01:51 Speaker 10: hold off on Councillor Debrine until

03:01:53 Speaker 10: anyone else else that hasn't spoken

03:01:54 Speaker 10: wishes to. To the amendment, Councillor

03:01:56 Speaker 10: Nielsen, I can't remember. Have you

03:01:57 Speaker 10: spoken to the amendment other than

03:01:59 Speaker 10: making the motion? I know you

03:02:01 Speaker 10: made the motion, so I'll I'll

03:02:04 Speaker 10: go past him as well. Councillor

03:02:05 Speaker 10: Borden, y'all, please. Thank you, Deputy

03:02:09 Speaker 10: Warden. Through you, I I think

03:02:10 Speaker 10: to count the Councillor Eccles' comments,

03:02:11 Speaker 10: it is a matter of wording.

03:02:12 Speaker 10: The amendment to me does not

03:02:14 Speaker 10: go far enough. because a review

03:02:15 Speaker 10: of targets is it going to

03:02:18 Speaker 10: be targets established and goals met?

03:02:21 Speaker 10: So if we're looking for a

03:02:22 Speaker 10: fulsome report, I think the initial

03:02:27 Speaker 10: motion we wouldn't have had this

03:02:28 Speaker 10: conversation. We said the implications removing

03:02:32 Speaker 10: or maintain me. It's it's a

03:02:35 Speaker 10: simple it's a simple word process

03:02:36 Speaker 10: that I think everybody wants a

03:02:39 Speaker 08: fulsome report. It's just a matter

03:02:42 Speaker 08: of I can't support the amendment

03:02:49 Speaker 08: only because it just says a

03:02:53 Speaker 08: review of targets that does nothing

03:02:56 Speaker 08: to to dictate a fulsome report.

03:02:57 Speaker 08: So. Some report, so I think

03:03:00 Speaker 08: it's just a matter of if

03:03:02 Speaker 39: it was removing or or maintaining,

03:03:07 Speaker 39: then we get a full report.

03:03:11 Speaker 39: What are our targets? What have

03:03:12 Speaker 39: we met? How this will affect

03:03:17 Speaker 39: us as we go forward? That

03:03:23 Speaker 74: that's the kind of report I

03:03:25 Speaker 74: I'd like to see. the the

03:03:27 Speaker 74: The amendment to it to me

03:03:29 Speaker 74: does not go far enough in

03:03:32 Speaker 74: to the original recommendation of the

03:03:34 Speaker 74: of the of the group. And

03:03:42 Speaker 74: just as a last point, is

03:04:03 Speaker 74: I I'm happy that the group

03:04:10 Speaker 74: meets and and the committee and

03:04:16 Speaker 49: makes recommendations because. there's still 18

03:04:20 Speaker 75: people to make the decision on

03:04:44 Speaker 75: that. It's just a at a

03:04:47 Speaker 75: local level when you have a

03:04:50 Speaker 75: committee of council, they bring it

03:04:52 Speaker 02: to all of council, which we're

03:04:54 Speaker 02: doing today. So I have no

03:04:56 Speaker 02: problem with any committee making recommendations

03:04:59 Speaker 02: to this council. That's just my

03:05:02 Speaker 02: comments, Mr. Warden. Thank you, sir.

03:05:06 Speaker 02: Anyone else, Councillor Deckard? Please. Thank

03:05:07 Speaker 02: you, Deputy Warden. As I reflect

03:05:12 Speaker 02: back on on that meeting, you

03:05:15 Speaker 02: know the discussion that we had.

03:05:16 Speaker 02: varied from just saying no, we

03:05:22 Speaker 02: want to. Our proposal would be

03:05:28 Speaker 02: to cut it to actually coming

03:05:34 Speaker 02: back to to staff and saying

03:05:37 Speaker 02: we need to know the implications

03:05:40 Speaker 02: of cutting it. And I think

03:05:53 Speaker 02: that's really what our desire was

03:06:18 Speaker 02: here. It is so we were

03:06:20 Speaker 49: making an educated decision down the

03:06:21 Speaker 01: road, and and therefore you know

03:06:22 Speaker 08: the motion as it was presented

03:06:24 Speaker 08: in from the meeting minutes, I

03:06:26 Speaker 08: think is is really gets us

03:06:28 Speaker 08: to where we want it to

03:06:30 Speaker 08: be. If we all recognized around

03:06:33 Speaker 08: that table, we need to know

03:06:37 Speaker 08: more about what this action would

03:06:39 Speaker 08: do. So I, I can't support

03:06:42 Speaker 09: the amendment. I would support the

03:06:44 Speaker 09: original motion. Okay, thank you, sir,

03:06:51 Speaker 09: Councillor Hutchison. Well, thank you, Deputy

03:06:53 Speaker 09: Warden. This time, I'd like to

03:06:55 Speaker 09: call the vote, please. Is there

03:06:56 Speaker 02: is there anyone else that has

03:06:58 Speaker 02: not spoken to the motion yet,

03:07:00 Speaker 02: the amendment? I'm going to go

03:07:02 Speaker 02: back to Councillor Debrine if no

03:07:09 Speaker 02: one else. Councillor Debrine. my question

03:07:11 Speaker 02: through you, Deputy Warden, was more

03:07:13 Speaker 02: of on procedure. I am uncom.

03:07:14 Speaker 02: I'm not totally sold on the

03:07:22 Speaker 02: amendment, and I wanted to understand

03:07:30 Speaker 02: from the clerk procedure of an

03:08:04 Speaker 02: amendment. But I will just allow

03:08:06 Speaker 02: the the question to be called,

03:08:12 Speaker 02: and I can propose an amendment.

03:08:15 Speaker 02: Okay, Councillor Nielsen, I give you

03:08:17 Speaker 02: the last word. You. Neilson, I

03:08:18 Speaker 02: give you the last word. You

03:08:20 Speaker 02: were the motion. You made the

03:08:23 Speaker 02: motion for the amendment. I actually

03:08:26 Speaker 02: really appreciate that, Chair. The wording

03:08:27 Speaker 02: of the motion. I understand and

03:08:29 Speaker 02: respect the conversation we're having, which

03:08:30 Speaker 02: is exact, which is fantastic, actually.

03:08:32 Speaker 02: The motion was working with staff

03:08:33 Speaker 02: to try to find a motion

03:09:46 Speaker 02: that would amendment that would work

03:09:48 Speaker 02: to get to the place where

03:09:49 Speaker 76: we were before this motion. The

03:09:51 Speaker 77: motion from the budget and finance

03:09:53 Speaker 77: committee came. That staff have already

03:09:54 Speaker 77: have the direction to bring forward

03:09:57 Speaker 77: a report. That's the goal of

03:09:58 Speaker 77: the. motion. That was the goal.

03:10:01 Speaker 77: The wording was working with staff

03:10:03 Speaker 77: to bring that forward. So, if

03:10:05 Speaker 46: if council's position is they want

03:10:08 Speaker 46: to move a motion to have

03:10:10 Speaker 46: implications of one or the other,

03:10:11 Speaker 46: or if the council wants to

03:10:14 Speaker 46: have the report that staff are

03:10:16 Speaker 46: already working on, is kind of

03:10:21 Speaker 46: where we're standing here. My motion

03:10:25 Speaker 46: is trying to direct staff to

03:10:27 Speaker 46: keep carrying carrying on with the

03:10:29 Speaker 46: direction they've already received, rather than

03:10:31 Speaker 09: having a different report come forward

03:10:33 Speaker 09: that has different implications. Okay, I'm

03:10:36 Speaker 09: going to call the question on

03:10:38 Speaker 09: the amendment. All those in favour?

03:10:39 Speaker 09: Opposed? That motion fails. So now

03:10:42 Speaker 09: we're back to the amended, or

03:10:50 Speaker 09: back to the original motion, as

03:10:52 Speaker 09: unamended. Councillor Debrine, please. I'd like

03:10:53 Speaker 09: to propose an amendment that just

03:10:54 Speaker 09: disappeared. Sorry. That says that in

03:10:57 Speaker 08: keeping. with the goal, is that

03:10:59 Speaker 08: staff bring a progress report on

03:11:00 Speaker 08: the targets established and the cost

03:11:01 Speaker 08: analysis of going green and grey

03:11:02 Speaker 08: to be presented prior to or

03:11:04 Speaker 08: in consideration of the 2027 budget?

03:11:06 Speaker 08: Okay, thank you. Is there a

03:11:07 Speaker 08: seconder for that motion, Councillor Mackay?

03:11:13 Speaker 08: It's so close. It's close. Well,

03:11:14 Speaker 08: we're getting on here. I need,

03:11:18 Speaker 08: I need lunch. Anyway, okay. It's

03:13:19 Speaker 08: been moved and seconded. Discussion on

03:19:30 Speaker 08: the amendment. We'll wait until. Can

03:42:18 Speaker 08: we get it up on the

03:48:28 Speaker 08: screen? Maybe restate your your amendment,

03:53:46 Speaker 08: please, Councillor Debrine. Let staff prepare

03:56:23 Speaker 08: a report on the targets. So,

03:56:26 Speaker 08: remove the implications of removing, and

03:56:27 Speaker 08: replace it with the targets. and

03:56:31 Speaker 08: cost analysis. So, in consultation with

03:56:35 Speaker 01: the clerk, she is suggesting that

03:56:37 Speaker 01: we. have already voted down the

03:56:46 Speaker 01: notion of a report on the

03:56:48 Speaker 01: targets, but if you would revise

03:56:50 Speaker 01: your motion, your amendment to just

03:56:58 Speaker 01: include the financial implications, then that

03:57:00 Speaker 08: would be sufficient. That was my

03:57:03 Speaker 08: goal. Thank you. All right, we'll

03:57:05 Speaker 08: get this onto the screen here.

03:57:08 Speaker 08: Ah, yeah, no kidding, no kidding.

03:57:12 Speaker 08: I'm going to be talking to

03:57:16 Speaker 08: the warden after this. I can

03:57:19 Speaker 08: tell you that her timing is.

03:57:22 Speaker 08: I'm having fun. I don't know

03:57:24 Speaker 08: about the rest of you. We'll

03:57:26 Speaker 08: get there. We'll get there. Good

03:57:29 Speaker 08: discussion. I haven't got any other

03:57:32 Speaker 08: stories right now. Uh huh. Uh

03:57:33 Speaker 08: huh. Okay, I'll read the motion

03:57:35 Speaker 08: back. It's, I believe it's on

03:57:37 Speaker 08: the screen. Yes, it is. That

03:57:42 Speaker 08: the motion be amended to insert

03:57:44 Speaker 08: a clause requesting staff to bring

03:57:47 Speaker 08: forward a report on the financials

03:57:50 Speaker 08: of going green and gray prior

03:57:52 Speaker 08: to the consideration of the 2027

03:57:55 Speaker 08: budget. Does that meet your description?

03:57:56 Speaker 08: Go ahead. Point of clarification, then,

03:57:58 Speaker 08: where is that being inserted? Because

03:58:00 Speaker 08: it's important to understand that. it's

03:58:06 Speaker 08: a progress report on the targets

03:58:10 Speaker 08: as well. So, well, it's not

03:58:11 Speaker 08: the the the piece about the

03:58:16 Speaker 08: targets is not being inserted because

03:58:20 Speaker 08: that was not part of the

03:58:23 Speaker 08: original motion, and the piece about

03:58:26 Speaker 08: the targets was already voted on

03:58:29 Speaker 08: and lost, so we can't include

03:58:32 Speaker 08: that. And it's covered in the

03:58:33 Speaker 08: twenty two twenty twenty. two motion,

03:58:35 Speaker 08: the direction that was all already

03:58:37 Speaker 08: given, so that is kind of

03:58:40 Speaker 08: taken care of, so to speak.

03:58:42 Speaker 08: So, where are we inserting this

03:58:45 Speaker 08: clause, and what are we removing?

03:58:46 Speaker 08: It's being suggested that we break

03:58:47 Speaker 10: for lunch. but it it kind

03:58:49 Speaker 10: of defeats the the notion that

03:58:52 Speaker 10: we have. As you you know,

03:58:53 Speaker 10: we have people interested in the

03:58:55 Speaker 10: gallery. I was hoping we could

03:58:56 Speaker 10: deal with this report prior to

03:58:58 Speaker 10: lunch, so that folks wouldn't have

03:59:00 Speaker 10: to come back. Just before I

03:59:03 Speaker 10: go to you, Councillor Nielsen, the

03:59:07 Speaker 10: clerk is still trying to. I

03:59:11 Speaker 10: want to get this motion on

03:59:14 Speaker 10: the floor or on the screen

03:59:17 Speaker 10: first before we go any further.

03:59:19 Speaker 10: Maybe. Yep. Thank you for your

03:59:22 Speaker 10: indulgence on that. While we suggested

03:59:24 Speaker 10: a spot to insert that amendment,

03:59:26 Speaker 10: so where you read the motion

03:59:28 Speaker 10: be amended, insert the clause directing

03:59:30 Speaker 10: staff to bring forward a report

03:59:33 Speaker 10: on the financials of going green

03:59:35 Speaker 10: and gray. That's the proposed amendment

03:59:37 Speaker 60: and the highlight. And the highlighted

03:59:40 Speaker 60: section underneath is what that would

03:59:43 Speaker 60: look like if it went through.

03:59:47 Speaker 60: So that's staff repair report and

03:59:51 Speaker 60: the implications of moving going green

03:59:54 Speaker 60: gray and bring forward a report

03:59:56 Speaker 60: on the financials for consideration prior

03:59:59 Speaker 60: to the 2027 budget is what

04:00:05 Speaker 60: staff have suggested. But looking for

04:00:06 Speaker 60: further input if if required. That's

04:00:09 Speaker 60: not exactly what I intended. We're

04:00:10 Speaker 60: kind of repeating what we're saying.

04:00:13 Speaker 14: Eating what we're saying, asking for

04:00:15 Speaker 14: a report on the implications of

04:00:16 Speaker 14: removing going green and gray. My

04:00:21 Speaker 14: intent was to the staff to

04:00:22 Speaker 14: bring the report they intended to

04:00:24 Speaker 14: bring in the first place, that

04:00:27 Speaker 14: included the financial implications of that

04:00:29 Speaker 14: plan. But I. Okay, I'm going

04:00:33 Speaker 14: to suggest we're going to break

04:00:35 Speaker 14: for lunch so that we can

04:00:38 Speaker 14: get this sorted out. This is

04:00:41 Speaker 14: why it's appreciated if you want

04:00:45 Speaker 14: amendments or. otherwise, bring them to

04:00:48 Speaker 14: the clerk prior to the meeting

04:00:50 Speaker 14: so that we're not trying to

04:00:52 Speaker 14: do this on the fly. I

04:00:54 Speaker 14: can appreciate how the discussion has

04:00:55 Speaker 14: unfolded, but let's break for lunch

04:00:56 Speaker 14: and we'll come back with the

04:00:57 Speaker 14: amended motion. Let's try to be

04:01:00 Speaker 14: back by say one forty, and

04:01:04 Speaker 14: I apologize to the gallery. Okay.

04:01:07 Speaker 14: One minute warning. Okay. thank you,

04:01:10 Speaker 14: Rob. We'll bring the meeting back

04:01:15 Speaker 10: to order. I trust everybody got

04:01:16 Speaker 10: a few bites, at least. So

04:01:17 Speaker 10: we're back to the proposed. amendment

04:01:18 Speaker 10: to the main motion. The amendment

04:01:21 Speaker 10: is okay. So the motion has

04:01:23 Speaker 10: not been actually made yet. So,

04:01:25 Speaker 10: Councillor Debrine, are you prepared to

04:01:27 Speaker 78: move the motion to amend? Thank

04:01:28 Speaker 19: you. Through you, if I could

04:01:30 Speaker 19: see what we finally landed on.

04:01:32 Speaker 19: I think I would like to

04:01:35 Speaker 19: move the motion. Okay, so the

04:01:38 Speaker 19: amendment is proposed to be to

04:01:42 Speaker 19: insert in the main motion, modifying

04:01:44 Speaker 10: or maintaining the actions within. So

04:01:47 Speaker 10: the the the amended motion would

04:01:48 Speaker 10: read that staff prepare a report

04:01:50 Speaker 10: on the implications of removing, and

04:01:52 Speaker 10: then the amendment starts modifying or

04:01:54 Speaker 10: maintaining the actions. That's the end

04:01:58 Speaker 10: of the or within. That's the

04:02:06 Speaker 19: end of the amendment, and then

04:02:07 Speaker 19: the Going Green and Gray Initiative

04:02:12 Speaker 19: for the consideration of the 2027

04:02:13 Speaker 19: budget. I so move. Is there

04:02:14 Speaker 19: a seconder? Councillor Carlton will second

04:02:17 Speaker 19: that. Thank you. Any discussion on

04:02:18 Speaker 19: the amendment? Not seeing any. I'll

04:02:20 Speaker 19: call the question. All those in

04:02:22 Speaker 19: favour? That is carried. Now we're

04:02:25 Speaker 76: back to the motion, the original

04:02:28 Speaker 76: motion as amended. Do I need

04:02:30 Speaker 76: to read it again? Okay. Any

04:02:33 Speaker 08: discussion on the motion as amended?

04:02:34 Speaker 08: Not seeing any. I'll call the

04:02:37 Speaker 08: question. All those in favour? Votes.

04:02:41 Speaker 08: Go ahead, Councillor Nielsen. I pulled.

04:02:43 Speaker 08: I pulled the Councillor Eccles. Last

04:02:45 Speaker 08: last minute. Last minute comment. Just

04:02:49 Speaker 08: for clarity, for myself, from. staff,

04:02:53 Speaker 08: passing this motion changes direction to

04:02:57 Speaker 08: staff that was previously given back

04:02:59 Speaker 08: in 2022 when we created Green

04:03:02 Speaker 08: and Gray, and the motion to

04:03:03 Speaker 08: bring forward a review of the

04:03:06 Speaker 08: Growing Green and Gray plan in

04:03:12 Speaker 08: 2026. This motion will supersede that

04:03:12 Speaker 08: motion and give direction that this

04:03:14 Speaker 08: is what we're looking for this

04:03:16 Speaker 08: time. And if we vote against

04:03:17 Speaker 08: this motion, we still get that

04:03:19 Speaker 08: report. And if we vote in

04:03:22 Speaker 08: favour, this one supersedes that one.

04:03:25 Speaker 08: That's all. I'm just wanting clarity

04:03:27 Speaker 08: for everybody around the horse. Clarity

04:03:28 Speaker 08: for everybody on the horseshoe, as

04:03:30 Speaker 08: unclear as that was. I'm looking

04:03:32 Speaker 08: for clarity. Right, Rainy, you want

04:03:34 Speaker 08: to speak to that, please. So,

04:03:36 Speaker 08: the 2022 motion indicates that staff

04:03:39 Speaker 08: would bring forward a report regarding

04:03:40 Speaker 08: the targets with respect to going

04:03:42 Speaker 08: green and gray. So that could

04:03:44 Speaker 60: be, you know, similar to what's

04:03:46 Speaker 60: identified as part of this motion,

04:03:48 Speaker 60: but this helps clarify. I think,

04:03:50 Speaker 60: in terms of what information will

04:03:51 Speaker 60: be brought back by staff as

04:03:53 Speaker 60: part of that comprehensive report, to

04:03:55 Speaker 60: give the information that this council

04:03:57 Speaker 60: needs in order to determine what's

04:03:59 Speaker 60: what's what's kept, what's changed, what's

04:04:01 Speaker 60: potentially removed or shifted. I think

04:04:03 Speaker 60: this motion would give that further

04:04:05 Speaker 60: clarification. Thank you, Randy. Last call

04:04:08 Speaker 60: for questions. Councillor Carlton. Maybe this

04:04:09 Speaker 60: doesn't mean anything, but who

04:04:11 Speaker 60: is the report coming back to?

04:04:14 Speaker 60: Budget and Finance, or County Council?

04:04:16 Speaker 60: I think at this stage, staff

04:04:18 Speaker 60: would recommend that this report come

04:04:20 Speaker 60: back to Council. So committee of

04:04:22 Speaker 60: the whole initially, but then to

04:04:23 Speaker 60: Council. Yeah, may as well. Okay,

04:04:25 Speaker 60: I'm going to call the question.

04:04:27 Speaker 60: All those in favour? Opposed to

04:04:29 Speaker 60: any? That carries. Thank you very

04:04:32 Speaker 60: much, ladies. and gentlemen. Now we

04:04:34 Speaker 60: move on to the fifth recommendation

04:04:37 Speaker 60: from the Budget and Audit Committee,

04:04:39 Speaker 60: or Budget and Finance rather. You're

04:04:41 Speaker 60: jumping ahead. You were hoping. You

04:04:43 Speaker 60: were hopeful. You were hopeful. I

04:04:44 Speaker 60: need a mover for that recommendation.

04:04:48 Speaker 60: There, Councillor Nielsen, second to by

04:04:49 Speaker 60: Councillor Body. Councillor Nielsen, you have

04:04:51 Speaker 60: a question. Thank you very much,

04:04:53 Speaker 60: Deputy Warden. Just commenting. number five.

04:04:55 Speaker 60: It says the report regarding the

04:04:57 Speaker 60: ten-year capital forecast come forward, but

04:04:58 Speaker 60: it does say removing the experimental

04:05:01 Speaker 60: acres, which was a loss. So

04:05:03 Speaker 60: I guess that will automatically change

04:05:05 Speaker 60: and update. Just for clarity, I

04:05:07 Speaker 60: heard disregard. So I'm going to

04:05:09 Speaker 60: do that. No, sorry, I I

04:05:11 Speaker 60: didn't understand your. Go ahead, try

04:05:15 Speaker 60: it again. My apologies, Deputy Warren.

04:05:17 Speaker 60: I was talking a little fast.

04:05:19 Speaker 60: Just I'm making sure I'm on

04:05:22 Speaker 60: the same page with the clerk.

04:05:23 Speaker 60: Was that their one section of

04:05:26 Speaker 60: item number five says we're moving

04:05:28 Speaker 60: funding for the experimental Lakers project?

04:05:29 Speaker 60: That motion lost earlier. I was

04:05:31 Speaker 60: just more commenting that this will

04:05:33 Speaker 60: automatically be updated through the clerk's.

04:05:35 Speaker 60: So it's moving it here does

04:05:38 Speaker 60: not reestablish that idea. I'm going

04:05:40 Speaker 60: to say correct. All those in

04:05:41 Speaker 60: favour? That carries. Number six, the

04:05:42 Speaker 60: final one, the report regarding the

04:05:44 Speaker 60: capital project status update report as

04:05:47 Speaker 60: of. 31 of August of

04:05:48 Speaker 60: this year be received for

04:05:51 Speaker 60: information. Someone care to move that,

04:05:52 Speaker 60: please, Councillor Carlton, Councillor Pringle. Questions?

04:05:54 Speaker 60: All those in favour? That is

04:05:56 Speaker 60: carried. Apparently, it's been brought to

04:05:58 Speaker 60: my attention that we have not

04:05:59 Speaker 60: actually received the minutes yet. And

04:06:00 Speaker 60: here I thought we'd spent the

04:06:01 Speaker 60: last I don't know two days

04:06:05 Speaker 60: debating the minutes. but apparently we

04:06:06 Speaker 60: have not done that yet. So

04:06:10 Speaker 60: I need someone to move that,

04:06:12 Speaker 60: please, Councillor Deckard and Councillor Nielsen.

04:06:16 Speaker 60: Any discussion? All those in favour?

04:06:17 Speaker 60: That is carried. Perfect. Okay, Randy,

04:06:19 Speaker 60: you're up. We're going to talk

04:06:20 Speaker 60: about now Roma delegations. So Randy,

04:06:22 Speaker 60: the floor is yours, sir. Oh,

04:06:25 Speaker 60: oh no, no, we're doing the.

04:06:26 Speaker 60: Yeah, we have the two. Yep,

04:06:28 Speaker 79: yep. No, we have six A

04:06:30 Speaker 79: and six B, I think. Say

04:06:31 Speaker 79: in six B, I think. Am

04:06:34 Speaker 79: I wrong? Oh, okay. Oh man,

04:06:35 Speaker 60: I was really hoping to move

04:06:37 Speaker 60: this along. Try again. Okay, seven

04:06:39 Speaker 60: B is the item that we're

04:06:40 Speaker 60: going to entertain now on the

04:06:43 Speaker 60: budget, and it is regarding easement

04:06:46 Speaker 60: and memorandum of understanding. So,

04:06:48 Speaker 60: Randy, the floor is yours, sir.

04:06:50 Speaker 60: I don't know if we need

04:06:52 Speaker 60: a. mover and second for at

04:06:55 Speaker 60: least the first recommendation. Yes, we

04:06:57 Speaker 60: do. We need a mover and

04:06:59 Speaker 60: secondor, Councillor Hutchison and Debrine. Thank

04:07:01 Speaker 60: you very much. Thank you, Deputy

04:07:03 Speaker 60: Warden. Good afternoon, everybody.

04:07:05 Speaker 60: So I'll be as quick

04:07:08 Speaker 60: as I can with respect to

04:07:11 Speaker 60: this matter. The report I'm presenting

04:07:13 Speaker 60: today deals with two matters. First

04:07:15 Speaker 60: matter is updating Council on optioning

04:07:17 Speaker 60: back the lands adjacent to Gray

04:07:19 Speaker 60: Gables from Bright Shores, as directed

04:07:21 Speaker 60: by Council, and to recommend easements

04:07:23 Speaker 60: for Bright Shores as part of

04:07:26 Speaker 60: that land transfer. process. The second

04:07:27 Speaker 60: matter is to present a proposed

04:07:29 Speaker 60: MOU as per the previous direction

04:07:32 Speaker 60: from council, that outlines the terms

04:07:35 Speaker 60: of the potential sale of the

04:07:37 Speaker 60: portion of these lands to Grey

04:07:39 Speaker 60: Highlands to support the future development

04:07:41 Speaker 60: of an OPP station in Markdale.

04:07:44 Speaker 60: So, just to give some further

04:07:45 Speaker 60: background, in July 2020, Grey County

04:07:47 Speaker 60: transferred lands to Bright Shores as

04:07:48 Speaker 60: part of Grey County's contribution for

04:07:51 Speaker 60: the Markdale Hospital project. During that,

04:07:52 Speaker 60: the planning for that hospital project,

04:07:54 Speaker 60: it was determined that. stormwater upgrades

04:07:56 Speaker 60: were required on the approximate four-acre

04:07:58 Speaker 60: parcel adjacent to the south driveway

04:08:00 Speaker 60: entrance to the Grey Gables and

04:08:01 Speaker 60: Hospital properties. In order for the

04:08:03 Speaker 60: stormwater works to be eligible for

04:08:06 Speaker 60: provincial funding at that time, Brightshore

04:08:08 Speaker 60: is required to own the lands.

04:08:10 Speaker 60: The agreement allowed the county to

04:08:12 Speaker 60: repurchase the lands once the stormwater

04:08:15 Speaker 60: works were completed, and those stormwater

04:08:16 Speaker 60: upgrades are now finished. On May

04:08:18 Speaker 60: 22, 2025, the council passed a

04:08:19 Speaker 60: motion directing staff to opt. Directing

04:08:21 Speaker 60: staff to option those those lands

04:08:23 Speaker 60: back from Bright Shores, and to

04:08:25 Speaker 60: negotiate an agreement with Great Hinds

04:08:26 Speaker 60: to sell portions of these lands

04:08:29 Speaker 60: for a proposed OPP station. As

04:08:30 Speaker 60: part of the terms of optioning

04:08:31 Speaker 60: back the lands from Bright

04:08:35 Speaker 60: Shores, the county agreed to provide

04:08:36 Speaker 60: Bright Shores with an easement permitting

04:08:39 Speaker 60: access to the lands where the

04:08:42 Speaker 60: South Driveway Hospital sign was to

04:08:44 Speaker 60: be installed. The actual location of

04:08:46 Speaker 60: that sign moves slightly from its

04:08:49 Speaker 60: intended location, and as such, Bright

04:08:52 Speaker 60: Shores has requested that the easement.

04:08:53 Speaker 60: be amended to align with its

04:08:55 Speaker 14: present location, and that's shown in

04:08:59 Speaker 14: Figure One, outlined in blue. This

04:09:04 Speaker 14: easement will allow BrightSource to access

04:09:07 Speaker 14: the lands to erect, repair, maintain,

04:09:08 Speaker 14: change, or remove that's that hospital

04:09:10 Speaker 14: sign should they need to do

04:09:12 Speaker 14: so. BrightSource has also requested an

04:09:15 Speaker 14: additional easement to access and

04:09:17 Speaker 14: maintain the light poles that were

04:09:19 Speaker 14: installed as part of the Markdale

04:09:22 Speaker 14: Hospital project, and these are installed

04:09:24 Speaker 14: along the shared entrance, and that's

04:09:25 Speaker 14: outlined in red. on Figure One.

04:09:28 Speaker 14: Staff have no concerns with these

04:09:31 Speaker 80: requests, provided that they do not

04:09:32 Speaker 80: interfere with the future use of

04:09:34 Speaker 80: the lands by either the county

04:09:37 Speaker 80: or Gray Highlands. So it's recommended

04:09:40 Speaker 80: that easements be prepared for council's

04:09:44 Speaker 80: consideration, subject to further consultation with

04:09:47 Speaker 80: Bright Shores and Gray Highlands on

04:09:51 Speaker 80: the specific presences of the easement.

04:09:54 Speaker 80: So that's dealing with recommendation number

04:09:56 Speaker 80: one. I don't know if we

04:09:57 Speaker 80: want to just deal with that,

04:09:59 Speaker 46: and then I can go into

04:10:01 Speaker 46: the report on recommendation number two.

04:10:05 Speaker 46: Let's do motion one first. Are

04:10:06 Speaker 46: there any questions on the easement

04:10:09 Speaker 46: recommendation? Not seeing any. All those

04:10:11 Speaker 46: in favour? That is carried. Okay,

04:10:12 Speaker 46: Randy. Thank you, Deputy Warden. So,

04:10:15 Speaker 46: as noted earlier, part of the

04:10:17 Speaker 46: motion that was passed by County

04:10:18 Speaker 46: Committee the whole on May twenty

04:10:21 Speaker 46: second also directed staff to negotiate

04:10:23 Speaker 46: an agreement with Gray Highlands that

04:10:25 Speaker 46: would commit to selling a portion

04:10:27 Speaker 46: of the subject lands. This motion

04:10:30 Speaker 46: was based on a request received

04:10:33 Speaker 46: earlier this year from Gray Highlands

04:10:35 Speaker 46: requesting that the county consider transferring

04:10:37 Speaker 46: a part of the subject lands

04:10:39 Speaker 46: to the municipality. Gray Highlands is

04:10:42 Speaker 46: planning to construct a new police

04:10:45 Speaker 46: station in Markdale for the OPP,

04:10:47 Speaker 46: as the current Markdale location is

04:10:50 Speaker 46: slated for future residential development. Grayhounds

04:10:52 Speaker 46: Council also recently directed Grayhounds staff

04:10:55 Speaker 46: to begin negotiations for the development

04:10:57 Speaker 46: of a new OPP regional facility

04:11:00 Speaker 46: in Markdale. A media release from

04:11:02 Speaker 46: Gray Highlands issued last month

04:11:04 Speaker 46: notes that the new facility is

04:11:07 Speaker 46: proposed to serve as a repository

04:11:08 Speaker 46: for Serve as a reporting centre

04:11:10 Speaker 46: for policing services across Grampians County,

04:11:13 Speaker 46: supporting multiple municipalities and potentially expanding

04:11:14 Speaker 46: expanding service in the area. A

04:11:17 Speaker 46: draft MOU has been prepared, outlining

04:11:18 Speaker 46: the key terms as directed by

04:11:21 Speaker 46: Council, including that the county commits

04:11:26 Speaker 46: to selling only the land required

04:11:27 Speaker 46: to support the build, the build

04:11:29 Speaker 46: be designed as compact as possible,

04:11:31 Speaker 46: utilising the least amount of land

04:11:35 Speaker 46: as possible, that Greyhound covers all

04:11:38 Speaker 46: the costs with respect to the

04:11:44 Speaker 46: build design, stormwater. Bill design stormwater

04:11:47 Speaker 46: relocation legal survey that the existing

04:11:50 Speaker 46: stormwater and drainage works for Greggville

04:11:51 Speaker 46: site and shared entrances must be

04:11:53 Speaker 46: addressed in the design. If the

04:11:54 Speaker 46: OPP station does not proceed, the

04:11:56 Speaker 46: commitment is withdrawn. The sale price

04:11:58 Speaker 46: will be based on an appraisal,

04:12:00 Speaker 46: and that future agreement of purchase

04:12:05 Speaker 46: and sale will come back to

04:12:08 Speaker 46: council for approval. Staff have worked

04:12:10 Speaker 46: with Bright Shores and Greyhound staff

04:12:12 Speaker 46: in preparing the draft MOU, and

04:12:15 Speaker 46: it's recommended that a bylaw be

04:12:17 Speaker 46: brought forward for council's consideration. to

04:12:19 Speaker 46: authorise the warden clerk to execute

04:12:21 Speaker 46: the MOU, subject to any further

04:12:22 Speaker 46: minor revisions recommended by the parties.

04:12:24 Speaker 46: At this stage, there's no direct

04:12:25 Speaker 46: financial impacts to the county. Greyhounds

04:12:29 Speaker 46: will cover, like said, all the

04:12:31 Speaker 46: costs related to the transfer. The

04:12:32 Speaker 46: county has engaged an appraiser to

04:12:34 Speaker 46: determine the land value of the

04:12:37 Speaker 46: eventual sale, and the results of

04:12:39 Speaker 46: that appraisal will inform the agreement

04:12:42 Speaker 46: of purchase and sale, which would

04:12:43 Speaker 46: again come back to council at

04:12:45 Speaker 46: a future date. So that's dealing

04:12:50 Speaker 46: with the second recommendation and the.

04:12:51 Speaker 46: second recommendation in the in the

04:12:53 Speaker 46: report. Thank you, Randy. And I

04:12:58 Speaker 46: neglected to get a mover and

04:13:00 Speaker 46: seconder for that. Councillor Patterson

04:13:02 Speaker 46: and Councillor Hutchison. Any discussion or

04:13:05 Speaker 46: questions on that report? Not seeing

04:13:09 Speaker 46: any. I'll call the question. All

04:13:12 Speaker 46: those in favour? That is carried.

04:13:16 Speaker 46: Thank you, Randy. Now we have

04:13:18 Speaker 46: a report seven C from the

04:13:20 Speaker 46: clerk's office. It is regarding delegation

04:13:23 Speaker 46: of duties, bylaw and policy update.

04:13:26 Speaker 46: Is there a mover and seconder?

04:13:27 Speaker 46: Councillor Mackey. and Councillor Pringle. Madam

04:13:31 Speaker 46: Clerk, you have the

04:13:33 Speaker 46: floor. Thank you, Mr. Deputy Warden.

04:13:37 Speaker 46: This report is before you today

04:13:39 Speaker 46: as an update to the Delegation

04:13:42 Speaker 46: and Duties Bylaw. It is a

04:13:46 Speaker 46: policy that's required by the Municipal

04:13:48 Speaker 46: Act. As a municipality, Grey County

04:13:50 Speaker 46: exercises its decision-making abilities through council,

04:13:53 Speaker 46: and a Delegation of Duties Bylaw

04:13:55 Speaker 46: allows for certain authorities to be

04:13:57 Speaker 46: delegated to staff. or other bodies

04:14:00 Speaker 46: to approve on its behalf. It

04:14:02 Speaker 46: does help with streamlining and efficiency

04:14:05 Speaker 46: of municipal operations. It is a

04:14:07 Speaker 46: very important bylaw in that regard,

04:14:10 Speaker 46: and staff are able to approve

04:14:13 Speaker 46: administrative and operational items on council's

04:14:17 Speaker 46: behalf and carry out their their

04:14:19 Speaker 46: work. The current bylaw, as written,

04:14:20 Speaker 46: was updated in twenty twenty.

04:14:21 Speaker 46: It currently offers little flexibility for

04:14:24 Speaker 46: staff when they're carrying out operational

04:14:26 Speaker 46: matters, both for the staff that

04:14:29 Speaker 46: are doing the work and then

04:14:30 Speaker 46: the agreement staff in the clerks

04:14:32 Speaker 46: department who are supporting them, the

04:14:39 Speaker 46: bylaw also doesn't delegate signatories out

04:14:40 Speaker 46: past the warden and clerk for

04:14:43 Speaker 46: many of the items, so it

04:14:46 Speaker 46: it does often rest with the

04:14:48 Speaker 46: warden and clerk to sign as

04:14:50 Speaker 46: the signing officer of the organisation.

04:14:52 Speaker 30: This new bylaw does propose to

04:14:54 Speaker 30: shift that signatory to the staff

04:14:56 Speaker 30: who are actually approving the documentation.

04:15:00 Speaker 30: It will also allow staff to

04:15:03 Speaker 46: approve and sign documents that are

04:15:05 Speaker 46: non-financial or procured in accordance with

04:15:08 Speaker 46: the purchasing policy, where the subject

04:15:10 Speaker 46: matter is administrative or operational nature,

04:15:13 Speaker 46: and relate to the management of

04:15:15 Speaker 46: Gray County. It will also allow

04:15:17 Speaker 46: staff to sign amendments and terminations

04:15:21 Speaker 46: where that follow an agreement that

04:15:24 Speaker 46: has been signed, and other ancillary

04:15:26 Speaker 46: docs if there are no

04:15:32 Speaker 46: financial changes or implications to Gray

04:15:33 Speaker 19: County. There are a number of

04:15:36 Speaker 19: other delegations and changes listed in

04:15:37 Speaker 19: the report, but there are some

04:15:39 Speaker 19: that are worth just specifying during

04:15:41 Speaker 19: the presentation here. So there is

04:15:43 Speaker 19: a new section that includes special

04:15:46 Speaker 19: circumstances or emergencies when it's necessary

04:15:48 Speaker 19: to act within the normal mandate

04:15:51 Speaker 19: of a department, and giving the

04:15:53 Speaker 81: department heads the ability to act

04:15:55 Speaker 81: where needed. There's a reporting requirement

04:15:57 Speaker 81: that comes along with that. There's

04:15:59 Speaker 81: a delegation to the treasurer and

04:16:01 Speaker 81: clerk to appoint deputy treasurers and

04:16:03 Speaker 81: deputy clerks as needed. It specifies

04:16:06 Speaker 81: a section where certain staff are

04:16:08 Speaker 81: able to bring certain types of

04:16:10 Speaker 81: bylaw forward without a prior report

04:16:12 Speaker 81: to the whole. These reports include

04:16:13 Speaker 81: traffic matters, minor nature, heritage tax

04:16:16 Speaker 81: rebates, the Teague matters, tax increment

04:16:18 Speaker 81: grants. Thank you, and staff appointments

04:16:21 Speaker 81: as. well. There is a delegation

04:16:23 Speaker 81: of authority to the CAO to

04:16:24 Speaker 81: act during the restricted acts slash

04:16:26 Speaker 81: lame duck periods. In the year

04:16:28 Speaker 81: of a municipal election, there is

04:16:29 Speaker 81: a portion that exists in the

04:16:31 Speaker 81: current bylaw already, but this proposal

04:16:34 Speaker 81: would shift the rest of the

04:16:35 Speaker 81: eligible duties to the CAO to

04:16:37 Speaker 36: allow the CAO to act during

04:16:40 Speaker 36: restricted acts and lame duck. Historically,

04:16:43 Speaker 36: we've always brought a standalone bylaw

04:16:46 Speaker 36: forward, which delegates those duties during

04:16:48 Speaker 36: an election year, but having it

04:16:51 Speaker 36: incorporated into this bylaw would negate

04:16:54 Speaker 36: the need to do that. But

04:16:55 Speaker 36: it would just of note to

04:16:58 Speaker 36: council if there were staffing changes

04:17:00 Speaker 36: in the future, and or CEO

04:17:02 Speaker 36: was absent for a portion of

04:17:04 Speaker 36: that time, we would have to

04:17:06 Speaker 36: go back and and change that

04:17:11 Speaker 36: bylaw if if council wished just

04:17:13 Speaker 36: to do so. There is a

04:17:15 Speaker 36: delegation of authority to the museum

04:17:19 Speaker 36: manager and or the director of

04:17:21 Speaker 36: economic development. Tourism, and Culture to

04:17:22 Speaker 36: approve or deny the exceptions at

04:17:24 Speaker 36: the museum. Sorry, delegation of authority

04:17:27 Speaker 36: to the Director of Long-Term Care

04:17:32 Speaker 36: to approve and sign temporary bed

04:17:33 Speaker 36: licences, signing waivers for all department

04:17:38 Speaker 36: heads, agreements with federal and provincial

04:17:39 Speaker 36: governments, agencies, institutions, and community partners

04:17:41 Speaker 36: for county undertakings, programme delivery, and

04:17:45 Speaker 36: administration. That's a summary of the

04:17:47 Speaker 36: changes in the. report. What the

04:17:49 Speaker 36: bylaw doesn't do is allow staff

04:17:51 Speaker 36: to approve or sign documentation that

04:17:53 Speaker 36: for things that haven't been approved

04:17:53 Speaker 36: by council. So those those will

04:17:55 Speaker 36: still have to go through the

04:17:57 Speaker 36: budget process and be approved by

04:17:59 Speaker 36: county council. Or if they're considered

04:18:04 Speaker 36: administrative and operational, that would shift

04:18:06 Speaker 82: to staff approving and signing. It

04:18:08 Speaker 82: also doesn't remove any. decision making

04:18:11 Speaker 82: from council. That is retained by

04:18:14 Speaker 82: virtue of being council, and it

04:18:17 Speaker 82: can be revoked at any time,

04:18:19 Speaker 82: with the exception of one item,

04:18:23 Speaker 82: which is the head for the

04:18:24 Speaker 83: purposes on and FIPA. That was

04:18:26 Speaker 83: actually previously delegated many years ago,

04:18:27 Speaker 36: but it's incorporated into this bylaw

04:18:30 Speaker 36: as well for clarity. That's kind

04:18:32 Speaker 36: of a summary of the report.

04:18:34 Speaker 36: And happy to take any questions

04:18:36 Speaker 36: with there. Thank you, Tara. Are

04:18:37 Speaker 36: there any questions, Councillor Bourdon? Thank

04:18:39 Speaker 36: you, Deputy Warden. Through you, thanks,

04:18:40 Speaker 36: Tara. Just on page three, the

04:18:42 Speaker 36: top of page three, agreements with

04:18:43 Speaker 36: federal and provincial governments, agencies, institutions.

04:18:45 Speaker 36: Can you just extrapolate that further?

04:18:47 Speaker 84: That's is that just the execution

04:18:48 Speaker 84: of them? Because those some of

04:18:50 Speaker 84: those agreements should come to this

04:18:51 Speaker 84: council. I'm just just for clarification.

04:18:52 Speaker 84: So the way it's proposed in

04:18:54 Speaker 84: the bylaw is it would be

04:18:56 Speaker 84: the blanket agreements with federal and

04:18:57 Speaker 84: provincial governments. There's no threshold in

04:18:58 Speaker 84: there, but as long as the

04:19:00 Speaker 84: programme or activity has been approved

04:19:02 Speaker 84: by council, if it hasn't been

04:19:06 Speaker 84: approved by council, then those agreements

04:19:07 Speaker 84: would still have to come back

04:19:09 Speaker 84: for actual endorsement. Okay. Any further

04:19:12 Speaker 84: questions? Call the question. All those

04:19:14 Speaker 84: in favour? That is carried. Thank

04:19:15 Speaker 84: you, Chair. Now we're moving on

04:19:20 Speaker 84: to 7E because we've already dealt

04:19:23 Speaker 84: with D. This is a report

04:19:25 Speaker 85: from Stephanie Stewart regarding continuation of

04:19:27 Speaker 85: the GTR and the Ghost Transit

04:19:33 Speaker 85: Systems in 2026. Stephanie, welcome. Floor

04:19:35 Speaker 85: is yours. Wait, I need a

04:19:37 Speaker 85: mover and seconder. Sorry, Councillor Keaveny

04:19:40 Speaker 85: and Councillor Hutchison. Thank you, Your

04:19:41 Speaker 85: Worship. Good afternoon, County Council. So,

04:19:43 Speaker 85: my report this afternoon is just

04:19:44 Speaker 02: to seek your approval to extend

04:19:51 Speaker 02: operations of the GTR and to

04:19:53 Speaker 02: participate in the Ghost Transit service

04:19:56 Speaker 02: until August thirty first, twenty twenty

04:19:58 Speaker 02: six, ensuring continued transit access during

04:20:00 Speaker 02: the transition to a potential new

04:20:02 Speaker 02: regional system. The province has approved

04:20:04 Speaker 02: OTIF funding to support both these

04:20:05 Speaker 02: services, and staff have confirmed from

04:20:08 Speaker 02: contributing partners that they will also

04:20:10 Speaker 02: support this idea. There are no

04:20:11 Speaker 60: further financial requests outside of this

04:20:13 Speaker 60: previously. sorry, outside the previously approved

04:20:16 Speaker 60: three county levy of one hundred

04:20:18 Speaker 60: and forty-five thousand for twenty twenty-six

04:20:20 Speaker 60: budget considerations, as per my last

04:20:22 Speaker 60: report. At this time, I'd like

04:20:24 Speaker 60: to take any questions. If you

04:20:26 Speaker 60: have any, okay. Thank you, Stephanie.

04:20:28 Speaker 60: Any questions, Councillor Gregg? Please. Thank

04:20:30 Speaker 60: you. And just a couple questions,

04:20:31 Speaker 60: just to confirm some of the

04:20:33 Speaker 60: numbers in the charts on

04:20:37 Speaker 60: page five. The ghost has

04:20:39 Speaker 60: been a great service, benefiting people

04:20:40 Speaker 60: up and down Highway Six. I've

04:20:43 Speaker 60: rode it many times and. good

04:20:46 Speaker 60: to see the revenues shown on

04:20:48 Speaker 60: on the chart as well. But

04:20:50 Speaker 60: the connectivity's been terrific, and and

04:20:53 Speaker 60: valued in the community for sure.

04:20:54 Speaker 60: One question, Stephanie: the chart

04:20:56 Speaker 60: shows fare revenue for the GTR,

04:20:59 Speaker 60: January to March of eighty seven

04:21:00 Speaker 60: hundred dollars. It also showed really

04:21:03 Speaker 60: positive, increasing ridership numbers above that.

04:21:05 Speaker 60: It just had me thinking that

04:21:07 Speaker 60: eighty seven hundred strikes me as

04:21:10 Speaker 60: not maybe being correct. Is that

04:21:12 Speaker 60: is that the actual fair revenue

04:21:14 Speaker 60: that is generated over three months,

04:21:18 Speaker 60: or is that just an error

04:21:20 Speaker 60: in the report? And second question

04:21:22 Speaker 60: is just to confirm: this year

04:21:24 Speaker 60: was one hundred one thousand of

04:21:26 Speaker 60: levy funding to the transportation department,

04:21:28 Speaker 60: and this increase projected to increase

04:21:30 Speaker 60: by forty three thousand. I think

04:21:32 Speaker 60: about one hundred forty four for

04:21:34 Speaker 60: twenty six. The ninety six thousand

04:21:36 Speaker 60: seven hundred is inclusive. within that

04:21:38 Speaker 60: 144 and not on top. I

04:21:40 Speaker 60: just wanted to confirm that.

04:21:42 Speaker 60: Thanks, your worship. So, in regards

04:21:45 Speaker 60: to your first question about fair

04:21:46 Speaker 60: revenue for the GTR, that's an

04:21:48 Speaker 60: estimate for 2026, and that was

04:21:50 Speaker 60: confirmed through our finance team looking

04:21:54 Speaker 60: at our previous fair revenues

04:21:57 Speaker 60: and calculating and projecting forward. I

04:21:58 Speaker 60: can double check just to make

04:22:01 Speaker 60: sure that I have that correct

04:22:02 Speaker 60: and report back to council in

04:22:05 Speaker 60: case I have had a typo.

04:22:08 Speaker 60: and in regards to the ninety-six

04:22:12 Speaker 60: thousand seven hundred, that is inclusive.

04:22:14 Speaker 60: Thank you for that. And when

04:22:15 Speaker 60: we are looking at next

04:22:18 Speaker 60: year's budget, what's the fair revenue,

04:22:21 Speaker 60: the cost per ride, and what

04:22:23 Speaker 60: the staff consider when you're looking

04:22:26 Speaker 60: at increases to user fees and

04:22:28 Speaker 60: charges and so forth? Through your

04:22:29 Speaker 60: worship, thank you for the question,

04:22:32 Speaker 60: Councillor Greg. So. that's still all

04:22:33 Speaker 60: to be determined in the study

04:22:38 Speaker 60: that we're currently undergoing. We will

04:22:40 Speaker 60: bring all of those options

04:22:42 Speaker 60: and possibilities back to council to

04:22:45 Speaker 60: make those educated decisions, so that

04:22:48 Speaker 60: we're all on the same page

04:22:50 Speaker 60: and happy and satisfied with the

04:22:53 Speaker 60: project moving forward and what the

04:22:55 Speaker 60: future may look like. So there

04:22:59 Speaker 60: will be opportunities for councillors

04:23:02 Speaker 60: to participate in councillor-specific kind of

04:23:06 Speaker 60: workshops to be in your feedback

04:23:07 Speaker 60: as to what you'd like to

04:23:10 Speaker 60: see transit look like in our

04:23:13 Speaker 60: region, and then also as a

04:23:16 Speaker 60: member of the general public, you

04:23:19 Speaker 60: can come out to any

04:23:21 Speaker 60: of our community stakeholders. meetings and

04:23:24 Speaker 60: share your feedback there as well.

04:23:25 Speaker 60: But I will assure you that

04:23:28 Speaker 60: we will bring the back fare

04:23:29 Speaker 60: policy to this council to

04:23:31 Speaker 60: give you the opportunity to

04:23:34 Speaker 60: let us know what you think.

04:23:36 Speaker 60: And could you just confirm

04:23:38 Speaker 60: what that current fare is on

04:23:41 Speaker 60: the GTR for that route? Through

04:23:44 Speaker 60: you, your worship, the fare cost

04:23:47 Speaker 60: for the GTR is five dollars

04:23:49 Speaker 60: to go between Dundalk and Orangeville.

04:23:50 Speaker 60: Okay. Any further questions? Not

04:23:53 Speaker 60: seeing any, I'll call the question.

04:23:56 Speaker 60: All those in favour? It is

04:23:58 Speaker 60: carried. Thank you, Stephanie. Next report

04:24:00 Speaker 60: is from the CAO. It is

04:24:03 Speaker 60: regarding Roma delegations. Didn't take that

04:24:05 Speaker 60: long to get back to that

04:24:06 Speaker 60: one. Randy, the floor is yours.

04:24:09 Speaker 60: Oh, I need a move.

04:24:11 Speaker 60: Well, I don't think I need

04:24:13 Speaker 60: a mover and seconder on that

04:24:16 Speaker 60: one. Do it. Thank you, Deputy

04:24:18 Speaker 60: Warden, and through you and to

04:24:20 Speaker 60: to County Council. So, staff have

04:24:22 Speaker 60: been working at trying to track

04:24:25 Speaker 60: as many of the potential delegation

04:24:27 Speaker 60: requests for Roma through various discussions

04:24:28 Speaker 60: that have occurred through County Council

04:24:29 Speaker 60: as well as at various subcommittees.

04:24:31 Speaker 60: So, based on that tracking of

04:24:33 Speaker 60: lists, and and you'll see it

04:24:35 Speaker 60: on the screen, which we just

04:24:37 Speaker 60: finalized as of as of yesterday.

04:24:39 Speaker 60: This this is the what we're

04:24:40 Speaker 60: recommending as as be our delegation

04:24:43 Speaker 60: request for Roma. of course, will

04:24:45 Speaker 60: take any direction from Council with

04:24:47 Speaker 60: respect to adding or removing any

04:24:48 Speaker 60: of these delegation requests as Council

04:24:51 Speaker 60: sees fit. But I'll just provide

04:24:54 Speaker 60: an overview of what we're recommending.

04:24:56 Speaker 60: First, would be to the Ministry

04:25:01 Speaker 60: of Municipal Affairs and Housing, discussing

04:25:02 Speaker 60: strategies to improve housing affordability, encouraging

04:25:03 Speaker 60: activation of approved developments, especially those

04:25:06 Speaker 60: that have sat dormant for

04:25:09 Speaker 60: some time, support resilient housing technologies

04:25:14 Speaker 60: to reduce fossil fuel reliance and

04:25:19 Speaker 60: long-term ownership costs. and advocate for

04:25:20 Speaker 02: increased base funding and retention of

04:25:23 Speaker 02: Georgian Colleges' own sound campus to

04:25:25 Speaker 02: be able to move forward with

04:25:31 Speaker 02: provincial priorities, including building more housing.

04:25:34 Speaker 02: That's something that last point we

04:25:34 Speaker 02: probably want to weave through each

04:25:36 Speaker 02: of the delegations in terms of

04:25:38 Speaker 02: the importance of of maintaining those

04:25:41 Speaker 02: rural college campuses in order to

04:25:42 Speaker 02: keep our skilled workforce to be

04:25:44 Speaker 02: able to move forward with these

04:25:47 Speaker 02: projects as well as aligning with

04:25:49 Speaker 02: the provincial priorities. With provincial priorities,

04:25:55 Speaker 02: second delegation request that staff would

04:25:58 Speaker 02: recommend is a request to the

04:26:04 Speaker 02: Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation,

04:26:06 Speaker 02: Trade, and Ministry of Finance,

04:26:09 Speaker 02: and this specifically would be around

04:26:14 Speaker 02: the topic of of the importance

04:26:16 Speaker 02: and critical role of rural college

04:26:19 Speaker 02: campuses in developing a skilled workforce

04:26:22 Speaker 02: in order to again advance some

04:26:25 Speaker 02: of those provincial priorities, such as

04:26:26 Speaker 02: building more housing and skilled workforce

04:26:30 Speaker 02: to support new and expanding industrial

04:26:33 Speaker 02: operations, energy projects, as well as

04:26:35 Speaker 02: even opening. up the Ring of

04:26:38 Speaker 02: Fire, and advocating for the increased

04:26:41 Speaker 02: base funding to sustain. In in

04:26:42 Speaker 02: our specific example, the Georgian College

04:26:44 Speaker 02: Oceansound Campus. Second staff delegation request

04:26:47 Speaker 02: recommendation is to the Ministry of

04:26:48 Speaker 02: Long Term Care. Through that delegation,

04:26:50 Speaker 86: we can provide updates on the

04:26:54 Speaker 86: new Rockwood Terrace and request flexibility

04:26:56 Speaker 86: on occupancy timelines beyond the current

04:27:00 Speaker 86: 14-day occupancy window that's required. Address

04:27:04 Speaker 86: delays in transitioning residents from. the

04:27:05 Speaker 86: behavioural support transition unit due to

04:27:08 Speaker 86: provincial bed allocation priorities, continue discussions

04:27:10 Speaker 86: and implications on the legislative changes

04:27:13 Speaker 86: for personal support workers and resident

04:27:14 Speaker 86: support personnel, and further address and

04:27:18 Speaker 86: discuss any updates with respect to

04:27:19 Speaker 86: the new bed allocations for Great

04:27:21 Speaker 86: Gables and future use of existing

04:27:23 Speaker 86: Rockwood Terrace when the new home

04:27:26 Speaker 86: is operational. The fourth delegation request

04:27:29 Speaker 86: is to the Ministry of Transportation,

04:27:30 Speaker 86: advocating for intersection control. system support,

04:27:32 Speaker 86: improved signage for emergency and pedestrian

04:27:34 Speaker 86: safety, seeking commitments to partner on

04:27:36 Speaker 86: the East-West Corridor options assessment to

04:27:40 Speaker 86: address Highway 26 congestion, and in

04:27:43 Speaker 86: conjunction with Simcoe County and the

04:27:44 Speaker 86: South Georgian Bay municipalities, and request

04:27:46 Speaker 86: improved coordination and communication during weather-related

04:27:47 Speaker 86: road closures. The next delegation request

04:27:49 Speaker 86: will be to the Ministry of

04:27:50 Speaker 86: Health, requesting increased offload. Increase offload

04:27:52 Speaker 86: nursing support, permanent funding for social

04:27:54 Speaker 86: navigators, and collabourating with Gravurs OHT

04:27:56 Speaker 86: and municipalities to improve recruitment and

04:27:58 Speaker 86: retention of physicians and healthcare professionals.

04:27:59 Speaker 22: Next delegation request to be to

04:28:02 Speaker 22: the Ministry of Environment, Conservation, and

04:28:05 Speaker 22: Parks, advocating for and this is

04:28:06 Speaker 22: something that's coming out of the

04:28:07 Speaker 22: waste management community practice discussions, advocating

04:28:09 Speaker 22: for extending recycling collection under the

04:28:11 Speaker 22: EPR model to small institutional, commercial,

04:28:13 Speaker 22: and industrial properties. and express concerns

04:28:14 Speaker 22: about landfill impacts from new regulations

04:28:15 Speaker 22: excluding those properties from municipal collection.

04:28:16 Speaker 22: To the Ministry of the Solicitor

04:28:18 Speaker 22: General, seeking clarity and funding for

04:28:20 Speaker 22: new armed security directives at provincial

04:28:21 Speaker 22: offences courts, and request a review

04:28:22 Speaker 22: of fence fines to align with

04:28:24 Speaker 22: enforcement costs and reduce reliance on

04:28:28 Speaker 22: property tax. And the last and

04:28:29 Speaker 22: final request that staff are recommending

04:28:31 Speaker 22: is to the Ministry of Natural

04:28:32 Speaker 22: Resources and Forestry. to discuss proposed

04:28:35 Speaker 22: changes to the Conservation Authorities, advocating

04:28:37 Speaker 22: for consistent watershed management and source

04:28:39 Speaker 22: water protection, emphasizing the value of

04:28:40 Speaker 22: sea lands for recreation and climate

04:28:41 Speaker 22: resilience, and reaffirming Grey County's commitment

04:28:43 Speaker 22: to participating in the upcoming review

04:28:44 Speaker 22: of the Niagara Government Plan. Just

04:28:45 Speaker 22: on that last one, staff are

04:28:47 Speaker 22: working on a report. We're planning

04:28:48 Speaker 22: to bring that forward to the

04:28:49 Speaker 22: December eleven th committee of the

04:28:50 Speaker 22: whole meeting with respect to the

04:28:51 Speaker 22: proposed changes to Conservation Authorities. So

04:28:53 Speaker 22: this is again. due to the

04:28:55 Speaker 22: deadline of the Roma request of

04:28:56 Speaker 22: November nineteenth, kind of being a

04:28:57 Speaker 22: bit proactive and submitting a placeholder

04:28:59 Speaker 22: request should council wish to do

04:29:02 Speaker 22: so. So those are the delegation

04:29:05 Speaker 22: requests that staff are recommending. Happy

04:29:07 Speaker 22: to take any further direction from

04:29:11 Speaker 22: council. Okay, thank you, Randy. Is

04:29:13 Speaker 22: there any requests or need to

04:29:16 Speaker 22: expand that list or shorten it?

04:29:19 Speaker 22: Okay, everybody seems happy with that,

04:29:21 Speaker 22: but I do need a mover

04:29:24 Speaker 22: and seconder to recommend. or to

04:29:27 Speaker 22: accept the recommendation. Councillor Nielsen,

04:29:30 Speaker 22: Councillor Mackey. Oh darn it, McKay,

04:29:32 Speaker 39: McKay, I was close. Sorry, Scott.

04:29:35 Speaker 39: I know, I know. Okay, so

04:29:39 Speaker 39: we have a mover and seconder.

04:29:43 Speaker 39: All those in favour? That is

04:29:46 Speaker 39: carried. Thank you very much, Randy.

04:29:48 Speaker 39: Okay, we have the two consent

04:29:49 Speaker 39: items. that I think we'll deal

04:29:51 Speaker 39: with now before the close session,

04:29:54 Speaker 39: we have six A and six

04:29:57 Speaker 39: B. I think was it Councillor

04:29:59 Speaker 39: McQueen that asked for six A,

04:30:09 Speaker 39: or was it Councillor Greg? Councillor

04:30:10 Speaker 39: Greg asked for six A. So

04:30:12 Speaker 02: you'll move that recommendation, or do

04:30:15 Speaker 02: you wish to change the direction?

04:30:17 Speaker 02: Is there a seconder for that?

04:30:19 Speaker 02: Oh, you didn't. Sorry, sorry, I.

04:30:22 Speaker 02: misunderstood. Someone care to move that

04:30:24 Speaker 02: recommendation, Councillor McQueen, seconded by Councillor

04:30:27 Speaker 02: Nielsen. Okay, that is regarding the

04:30:29 Speaker 02: County Council and Advisory Committee meeting

04:30:32 Speaker 02: calendar. Anyone wish to have questions

04:30:34 Speaker 02: discussion, Councillor Greg? Thank you, and

04:30:36 Speaker 02: through you, Warden, Deputy Warden. At

04:30:37 Speaker 02: the top of the second page,

04:30:39 Speaker 02: it states it is anticipated. that

04:30:43 Speaker 02: electronic participation will continue in order

04:30:44 Speaker 02: to support attendance for those with

04:30:45 Speaker 02: variable schedules. I see a real

04:30:47 Speaker 02: benefit in having members present in

04:30:49 Speaker 02: the chambers, and I can understand

04:30:51 Speaker 02: at times the requirement to join

04:30:53 Speaker 02: virtually. But if this is the

04:30:57 Speaker 02: moment the council should be having

04:30:59 Speaker 02: a discussion about what our practice

04:31:01 Speaker 02: is, I didn't want it to

04:31:02 Speaker 02: to pass by. I understand we

04:31:04 Speaker 02: went through our period of. of

04:31:06 Speaker 02: COVID, and it was certainly necessary,

04:31:07 Speaker 22: but I think at this time

04:31:09 Speaker 22: it is very beneficial to be

04:31:12 Speaker 22: able to look across the, the

04:31:13 Speaker 22: council floor at your peers, and

04:31:15 Speaker 22: see the hands that go in

04:31:17 Speaker 22: the air, the hands, the the

04:31:18 Speaker 02: interest, the engagement, and so forth.

04:31:21 Speaker 02: And I just wondered what appetite

04:31:23 Speaker 02: there is from council to have

04:31:28 Speaker 02: some sort of a parametre on

04:31:30 Speaker 02: in in person attendance. for a

04:31:33 Speaker 02: component of the year, a percentage

04:31:35 Speaker 02: of the meetings, a certain number

04:31:37 Speaker 02: of the meetings, or so

04:31:40 Speaker 02: forth. It's certainly something that I'd

04:31:43 Speaker 02: be amenable to. Okay, is there

04:31:46 Speaker 02: any discussion in that regard, Councillor

04:31:47 Speaker 02: McQueen? Thank you, Deputy Ward. I will say there is merit to having it leaving it in there to a certain degree because, one, if you come down with the flu or you don't want to, you know, feeling well, you can still participate. And I think few weeks, Councillor. And I think a few weeks ago or recently you you were you didn't come because you didn't want to spoil everybody else with your second part is weather. I know myself, I'm an hour away, and there's a lot of weather between here and there, and same with others. So you have that option as well if if it's inconvenient and risking your life and all that kind of stuff. So I mean, how do you put a number on that? I don't know. I think generally it's been working well in most parts. I know myself, I will try to be here, but I think there is that flexibility. that if you didn't have it, you you would miss a meeting on those two those two examples where you can still participate, still be part of it. So I certainly feel very strongly that it stays in there, and I think, you know, I don't think any of my colleagues would like to catch something that if I'm not feeling well. And I think that's one of the big ones that came out of COVID and that realization. But I think in most part we do come here, and I would agree. I see the colour of your eyes. I can't quite tell right now, but. you know, I think it's important if we can that we come. I don't know if it's being abused or not, but I just, I think it's important to have that flexibility. Okay, thank you. Any other discussion, Councillor Debrine? Through you, we're approving the calendar and, in general, the support attendance virtually. Would this, would that not require notice of motion to revisit the procedure bylaw, or develop an electronic participation policy? so that we could look at best practices across. I don't know that I think anticipated that the electronic participation would continue as it currently stands, unless otherwise a member brings notice motion for it. I would say fair enough, but I have no further amendment to this point. So we're just talking about the calendar, as you pointed out, but if. there was a notice of motion to give further direction to reconsider, we could do that. But at this point, there is not such an amendment proposed. Any further discussion? Yeah, there is an update coming for the procedural bylaw, not too distant future, I understand. So there will be another opportunity if so inclined. to do that. So on the calendar itself, I'll call the vote. All those in favour? That is carried. Seven B or six B rather is regarding the Gray County Egg Services Centre annual report. I think Councillor McQueen wished to move to receive that. Is that correct? Yes. Is there a seconder for that? Councillor Ackles will second that. Councillor McQueen. Thank you, Deputy Warden. And I only raised it because of the discussion we had about two hours ago. but I will follow up with the egg office if they would certainly do a presentation to this, especially with the experimental acres. Very good. Any other discussion on that one? Not seeing any. I'll call the question. All those in favour? That is carried. Okay, we do have a closed session. I believe that we're ready for that, Madam Clerk. We are okay. So the closed session request is that the Committee of the Whole does now go into closed session pursuant to Section. Two Hundred Thirty Nine, Part Two of the Municipal Act, Two Thousand One, is amended to discuss one litigation or potential litigation, specifically the Eden Oak subdivision, and B, or two, a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality, specifically a land acquisition. So I need a mover to go into closed session. Councillor McKay, Councillor Patterson will second that. All those in favour? That is carried. I'm not sure which staff we need to stay.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.