Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — December 11, 2025

Hook: Candlelight Event Sold Out Despite Snow

Grey County · County Council · December 11, 2025

Summary

The County Council convened on December 11, 2025, opening with attendance call and the singing of O Canada while acknowledging traditional Saugeen Ojibwe Nation territory. Following routine approval of November minutes, councillors heard community updates before voting to conclude proceedings without further business discussion.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
County Council
Date
December 11, 2025
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

Stephanie Patterson called the meeting to order.

00:11:38 Speaker 01: I'll bring the meeting to order

00:11:39 Speaker 02: and welcome all that are here

00:11:40 Speaker 02: with us today and online. So

00:11:43 Speaker 02: if you would rise as able,

2 O Canada

The assembly sang O Canada and acknowledged the traditional territory of the Nishnabek Nation, specifically honoring the Saugeen Ojibwe Nation to the south. The meeting confirmed attendance for most councillors while noting absences including Warden Matrasovs and Councillor Hutchinson.

00:11:45 Speaker 02: we'll sing "O Canada." our home

00:11:58 Speaker 02: and native land, true patriot love

00:12:06 Speaker 02: in all of us command. With

00:12:11 Speaker 02: glowing hearts, we see thee rise,

00:12:16 Speaker 03: the true North, strong and free.

00:12:20 Speaker 03: from far and wide, O Canada,

00:12:24 Speaker 03: we stand on guard for thee.

00:12:29 Speaker 03: God keep our land, glorious and

00:12:35 Speaker 04: free. O. Canada, we stand on

00:12:44 Speaker 04: guard for thee. Thank you. Please,

00:12:50 Speaker 04: Councillor Mackie. Councillor McKay. Councillor Carleton.

00:12:56 Speaker 04: Councillor Pringle. Councillor. McQueen, we are

00:13:13 Speaker 04: expecting later this morning. Councillor

00:13:17 Speaker 04: Nielsen, glad to be here. Councillor

00:13:20 Speaker 04: Patterson, Councillor Dicker, Councillor Kentner, Councillor

00:13:23 Speaker 05: Keaveny, Councillor Body, Councillor Gregg, Deputy

00:13:27 Speaker 05: Warden Milm, Councillor Debrine, the

00:13:31 Speaker 05: Warden is attending shortly. Councillor Bourdainon,

00:13:36 Speaker 05: present. Councillor Eccles, Councilor Tom. Councillor

00:13:40 Speaker 05: Tom Hutchinson is absent today.

00:13:43 Speaker 05: Alternate Councillor Doug Hutchinson present.

00:13:47 Speaker 05: Thank you. We have all members

00:13:50 Speaker 05: in attendance today, with the exception

00:13:53 Speaker 05: of Warden Matrasovs and McQueen and

00:13:54 Speaker 05: Hutchinson. We acknowledge with respect. We

00:13:56 Speaker 05: are gathered on the traditional territory

00:14:05 Speaker 05: of the Nishnabek Nation, the people

00:14:07 Speaker 05: of the Three Fires, known as

00:14:08 Speaker 05: the Jibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi Nations.

00:14:10 Speaker 05: We give thanks to the Chippewas

00:14:12 Speaker 05: of Saugeen and Chippewas of Nawash,

00:14:15 Speaker 02: known collectively as the Saugeen Ojibwe

00:14:16 Speaker 02: Nation, the traditional keepers of these

00:14:19 Speaker 02: lands and waters since time immemorial.

00:14:21 Speaker 02: To our south lies the traditional

00:14:22 Speaker 02: territories of the Six Nations of

00:14:25 Speaker 02: the Grand River and the Haudenosaunee.

00:14:27 Speaker 02: We are dedicated to honoring Indigenous

00:14:29 Speaker 02: history and culture, and committed to

00:14:31 Speaker 02: moving forward in the spirit of

00:14:33 Speaker 02: truth, reconciliation, and friendship with all

00:14:35 Speaker 02: First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people.

00:14:38 Speaker 02: Is there any declaration? of interest

00:14:39 Speaker 02: related to any item on today's

00:14:44 Speaker 02: agenda? Not seeing any. If one

00:14:46 Speaker 02: should arise during the course of

00:14:49 Speaker 02: the meeting, you can of course

00:14:51 Speaker 02: declare it at that time. We

00:14:52 Speaker 02: have sets of minutes here from

6.a County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated November 27, 2025

Council members moved and seconded the acceptance of open session minutes, confirmed there were no closed matters or reports, then proceeded to move and carry a bylaw confirming all actions.

00:14:53 Speaker 02: November 27th, open and closed sessions.

00:14:56 Speaker 02: Someone care to move that we

00:14:59 Speaker 02: accept those minutes? Councilor Durbin, second

00:15:03 Speaker 02: by Councilor Eccles. Any discussion? All

00:15:04 Speaker 02: those in favor? That is carried.

00:15:06 Speaker 02: We don't have. any closed meeting

00:15:09 Speaker 02: matters. There are no reports. We

00:15:13 Speaker 02: have a bylaw. Oh, sorry. I

00:15:14 Speaker 02: assumed that we could do them

00:15:16 Speaker 02: all together, but we need to

00:15:22 Speaker 02: do the second, the closed minutes

00:15:23 Speaker 02: of the November 27 meeting. So

00:15:24 Speaker 02: I need a mover, counsel, Councillor

00:15:27 Speaker 02: Patterson, and Councillor Dicker. Any discussion?

00:15:29 Speaker 02: All those in favor? That is

00:15:33 Speaker 02: carried. Okay. Moving on to the

00:15:37 Speaker 02: bylaw to confirm all actions confirming

00:15:41 Speaker 02: bylaw, Councillor Mackie, seconded by Councillor

00:15:44 Speaker 02: Pringle. Any discussion? All in favor?

10 News and Celebrations

The section highlights community celebrations including a sold-out Candlelight event at Gray Roots that welcomed over 2,000 people despite snow conditions. Paramedic services supported the sixth annual Global Medic Holiday Hustle by delivering 4,500 pounds of food to share and Salvation Army across Gray County. The Cheshire Santa Claus Parade is scheduled for next Saturday at 10:30 as the season's final parade where attendees can sit on Santa's knee. A non-motorized horse-drawn parade runs through Holstein village in its 32nd year starting Saturday at one p.m., while Thornbury hosts an Old Fashioned Christmas featuring hot chocolate, candy canes, and a tree lighting walk.

00:15:47 Speaker 02: That is carried. News and celebrations.

00:15:51 Speaker 02: We'll start off with Savannah has

00:15:54 Speaker 02: some news for us this morning.

00:15:57 Speaker 02: Welcome, Savannah. Thank you very much.

00:15:59 Speaker 02: Very excited to share with you

00:16:02 Speaker 02: that last week we had our

00:16:04 Speaker 02: first sold out Morris and My

00:16:06 Speaker 02: Candlelight of 2025. and this week

00:16:07 Speaker 02: coming up, I think we're down

00:16:09 Speaker 02: to 24 tickets, which means that

00:16:11 Speaker 02: we will have welcomed more than

00:16:13 Speaker 02: 2,000 people to Gray Roots over

00:16:14 Speaker 06: those two days for Morriston by

00:16:16 Speaker 06: Candlelight. So there is still space

00:16:17 Speaker 06: if you want to to attend.

00:16:19 Speaker 06: If any of your constituents would

00:16:20 Speaker 06: like to go, but it's just

00:16:22 Speaker 06: a wonderful night. We've got beautiful

00:16:23 Speaker 06: snow, but now we'd like no

00:16:24 Speaker 06: more. So if you can all

00:16:26 Speaker 06: pray with us for that, that

00:16:27 Speaker 06: would be wonderful. And looking forward

00:16:28 Speaker 06: to the event on Saturday. Thank

00:16:29 Speaker 06: you, Savannah. That is indeed good

00:16:31 Speaker 06: news. Kevin McNab has some news

00:16:33 Speaker 06: for us, Kevin. Good morning, everyone.

00:16:37 Speaker 06: Just let you know this week,

00:16:40 Speaker 06: paramedic services and transportation services proudly

00:16:42 Speaker 07: supported a Global Medic Holiday Hustle

00:16:45 Speaker 07: for the sixth year in a

00:16:47 Speaker 08: row. This year, 4,500 pounds of

00:16:49 Speaker 08: food items were delivered to share

00:16:51 Speaker 08: and Salvation Army, helping families across

00:16:53 Speaker 08: Gray County. Since joining in 2020,

00:16:55 Speaker 08: Gray County has received over 30,000

00:16:58 Speaker 08: pounds of food through this program.

00:16:59 Speaker 08: Across Ontario, the impact is even

00:17:01 Speaker 08: bigger. In 2024, 18 emergency services

00:17:04 Speaker 08: department and over 15 community partners

00:17:07 Speaker 08: distributed over 118,000 pounds of food

00:17:09 Speaker 08: across Ontario. I just want

00:17:12 Speaker 08: to say thanks to everybody making

00:17:14 Speaker 08: it possible. Thank you, Kevin, for

00:17:15 Speaker 08: that. It is rather astounding that

00:17:18 Speaker 08: we need that support in our

00:17:20 Speaker 08: community, but we do appreciate your

00:17:23 Speaker 08: efforts to help folks out. Anyone

00:17:24 Speaker 08: else have any news celebrations? Councillor

00:17:27 Speaker 08: McKay. Hold on. And for you,

00:17:30 Speaker 08: Santa Claus Parade will be coming

00:17:41 Speaker 08: up in Cheshire next Saturday, ten

00:17:44 Speaker 09: thirty. It's the—I do believe it's

00:17:46 Speaker 09: the last parade of the season.

00:17:50 Speaker 10: So anybody's welcome to come out

00:17:52 Speaker 10: and sit on Santa's knee. Okay.

00:17:54 Speaker 10: Thank you for that. Anyone else,

00:17:56 Speaker 10: Councillor? Carlton. Thank you, Deputy Warden.

00:18:00 Speaker 10: This Sunday afternoon at two o'clock

00:18:10 Speaker 10: is the non-motorized parade in the

00:18:12 Speaker 11: village of Kemble. Everybody, welcome. Thank

00:18:15 Speaker 11: you, Sue. Councillor Debrine. Good morning,

00:18:17 Speaker 12: Deputy Warden, and and all present.

00:18:23 Speaker 12: I just wanted to remind everyone

00:18:27 Speaker 12: that the Holstein non. The Holstein

00:18:30 Speaker 12: non-motorized Santa Claus parade is being

00:18:32 Speaker 13: held on Saturday at 1 p.m.

00:18:34 Speaker 13: in the village of Holstein. It

00:18:37 Speaker 13: runs the entire length of the

00:18:38 Speaker 13: the village, and it is actually

00:18:41 Speaker 14: in its 32nd year. It held

00:18:45 Speaker 14: it was increased, so hopefully everyone

00:18:49 Speaker 14: can come out, line the streets,

00:18:52 Speaker 14: and watch all the beautiful horses

00:18:54 Speaker 14: and other animals and people. Thank

00:18:56 Speaker 14: you for that, Councillor Body. Yes,

00:19:02 Speaker 14: thank you. Christmas is happening in

00:19:08 Speaker 14: December twenty fifth and on. Sound,

00:19:11 Speaker 14: thanks. Thanks for that, Captain. Anyone

00:19:19 Speaker 14: else? Okay. Oh, wait, we got

00:19:24 Speaker 14: somebody, Councillor Bordignon. Thank you, Deputy

00:19:27 Speaker 14: Warden, and. we're going to take

00:19:29 Speaker 15: a cue from our neighbors to

00:19:30 Speaker 15: the east and have Christmas on

00:19:32 Speaker 15: December 25th as well. But before

00:19:33 Speaker 15: that, we do have Old Fashioned

00:19:35 Speaker 15: Christmas in the town of Thornbury

00:19:36 Speaker 15: Saturday. We have a hot chocolate

00:19:39 Speaker 15: for everybody and candy canes, and

00:19:40 Speaker 15: we will light the tree at

00:19:43 Speaker 16: Town Hall, and then we'll close

00:19:44 Speaker 16: Brew Street and and enjoy a

00:19:45 Speaker 16: walk through with all the merchants

00:19:47 Speaker 16: on a on a pedestrian area.

00:19:49 Speaker 16: So everybody's looking forward to that.

00:19:50 Speaker 16: It's an annual tradition. Thank you.

00:19:52 Speaker 16: Thank you, Councilor Bordignon, for that.

00:19:55 Speaker 16: Will you be attending in person?

00:19:57 Speaker 16: or otherwise? Always in person. Always

00:19:59 Speaker 02: in person. I haven't heard you

00:20:04 Speaker 02: say that for a long time.

11 Adjournment

Councilor Kevney and Councilor Patterson voted to carry a motion to adjourn.

00:20:06 Speaker 02: Anyone else? Okay. With that, we'll

00:20:10 Speaker 02: ask for a motion to adjourn.

00:20:15 Speaker 02: Councilor Kevney, Councilor Patterson, all those

00:20:18 Speaker 02: in favor? That is carried. We'll

00:20:21 Speaker 02: just take a moment to switch

00:20:24 Speaker 02: over to our committee. The whole.

00:20:25 Speaker 02: Good morning, County Council. Thank you

00:21:13 Speaker 02: very much, Deputy Warden, for stepping

00:21:15 Speaker 02: in for our council meeting. We

00:21:17 Speaker 02: will now begin our committee, the

00:21:18 Speaker 02: whole meeting, of December eleventh, twenty

00:21:20 Speaker 17: twenty-five. At this point in time,

00:21:22 Speaker 17: we'll. put a call out for

00:21:24 Speaker 17: any declarations of interest for this

00:21:25 Speaker 17: agenda, and seeing none online or

00:21:28 Speaker 17: here in the chamber, we will

00:21:30 Speaker 17: move on to business arising from

00:21:31 Speaker 17: minutes. And item three a, it's

00:21:35 Speaker 17: recommended that the evaluation of countywide

00:21:37 Speaker 17: library services be considered by the

00:21:39 Speaker 17: joint municipal services committee. So this

00:21:41 Speaker 17: is a notice motion from Councillor

00:21:43 Speaker 17: Greg. So Councillor Greg, I, do

00:21:45 Speaker 17: you have more wording to share?

00:21:51 Speaker 17: to move before I look for

00:21:52 Speaker 17: a seconder, or is it the

00:21:53 Speaker 17: way that it's been published? Okay,

00:21:55 Speaker 17: so as published, so I'll need

00:21:58 Speaker 17: a seconder for us to get

00:21:59 Speaker 17: it on the floor for discussion.

00:22:00 Speaker 17: I see it seconded by Councillor

00:22:01 Speaker 17: Mackie. It's now on the floor

00:22:03 Speaker 17: for discussion. I'll go to the

00:22:04 Speaker 17: mover to begin the discussion, and

00:22:06 Speaker 17: then I'll look for other hands.

00:22:07 Speaker 17: Thank you, Warden, and just a

00:22:08 Speaker 17: couple quick comments to this item,

00:22:13 Speaker 17: which I will just read so

00:22:16 Speaker 17: that you know it's on the.

00:22:18 Speaker 17: audio, but that the evaluation of

00:22:20 Speaker 17: countywide library services be considered by

00:22:22 Speaker 17: the joint municipal services committee. Why

00:22:24 Speaker 17: I think this is important is

00:22:27 Speaker 17: in the last election, our current

00:22:28 Speaker 18: board chair acknowledged during an all-candidates

00:22:31 Speaker 18: debate the significant challenges in front

00:22:35 Speaker 18: of us with tax levels

00:22:39 Speaker 18: in our municipality, and to the

00:22:41 Speaker 18: tune of wanting to create a

00:22:45 Speaker 18: committee to look at. means and

00:22:47 Speaker 18: ways of lowering the tax levels

00:22:50 Speaker 18: for our residents. So when I

00:22:51 Speaker 18: see this year that the budget

00:22:55 Speaker 18: ask was originally around eleven percent,

00:22:56 Speaker 18: I think I'm recognizing that there

00:23:00 Speaker 18: is a significant fundamental challenge challenge

00:23:03 Speaker 18: in today's economic times for libraries

00:23:06 Speaker 18: to be able to monitor and

00:23:09 Speaker 18: maintain budget increases that are commensurate

00:23:10 Speaker 18: with levels of inflation in the

00:23:14 Speaker 18: community. Of inflation in the communities,

00:23:17 Speaker 18: so I did get looking through

00:23:18 Speaker 18: Gray County, 2024 North Gray Public

00:23:21 Speaker 18: Library total expense expenses are 2.143

00:23:26 Speaker 18: million dollars, Mefford 1.113 million dollars.

00:23:31 Speaker 18: However, that is not net of

00:23:33 Speaker 18: 152 thousand, which is part of

00:23:40 Speaker 18: the On Sound Library contract. Hanover

00:23:42 Speaker 18: 722 thousand. Twenty-two thousand West Gray,

00:23:46 Speaker 18: five hundred eighty-two thousand Southgate, four

00:23:49 Speaker 18: hundred seventy-one point eight thousand Gray

00:23:53 Speaker 18: Highlands, seven hundred forty-one thousand dollars.

00:23:54 Speaker 18: Town of Blue Mountains, one point

00:23:57 Speaker 18: one seven six million dollars. Cumulatively,

00:24:00 Speaker 18: this to the Gray County taxpayers

00:24:03 Speaker 18: is seven six point seven six

00:24:06 Speaker 18: million seven hundred ninety-eight thousand one

00:24:09 Speaker 18: hundred ninety-six dollars. In two thousand

00:24:12 Speaker 18: twenty-four, in budget room. for the

00:24:15 Speaker 18: provision of library services across the

00:24:17 Speaker 18: county to our residents, as we

00:24:19 Speaker 18: know, Bruce County, right next door,

00:24:22 Speaker 18: has a countywide library system. Their

00:24:27 Speaker 18: total 2024 budget line item was

00:24:31 Speaker 18: three million seven hundred forty-two thousand

00:24:33 Speaker 18: dollars, three million seven hundred forty-two

00:24:36 Speaker 18: thousand six hundred ninety-four dollars. That

00:24:41 Speaker 18: is a big difference between Gray.

00:24:43 Speaker 18: County's cumulative total of six point

00:24:45 Speaker 18: seven nine eight million and the

00:24:48 Speaker 18: two thousand twenty four cumulative total

00:24:50 Speaker 18: in Bruce County for service provision

00:24:52 Speaker 18: of three point seven four two

00:24:54 Speaker 18: million dollars. So I think it

00:24:57 Speaker 18: does behoove us around this table

00:24:59 Speaker 18: to have our Joint Municipal Services

00:25:02 Speaker 18: Committee look at this item, see

00:25:05 Speaker 18: if there is a possibility of

00:25:08 Speaker 18: moving forward in a more partnership

00:25:11 Speaker 18: model, as opposed to the more

00:25:16 Speaker 18: isolated model that we're currently deploying,

00:25:19 Speaker 18: because as those numbers would indicate

00:25:21 Speaker 18: on the surface, we are significantly

00:25:23 Speaker 18: above Bruce County's cost of service

00:25:27 Speaker 18: provision for library services. Thank you.

00:25:29 Speaker 18: Okay, thank you for that introduction.

00:25:33 Speaker 18: I will look around the room

00:25:34 Speaker 18: for hands. I'll begin with Councillor

00:25:35 Speaker 19: Borden online. Thank you, Madam Warden,

00:25:38 Speaker 20: through you, and thank you. for

00:25:40 Speaker 20: the notice of motion. Just in

00:25:42 Speaker 20: relation to the, I think it's

00:25:44 Speaker 21: a very good idea. Looking at

00:25:46 Speaker 16: this, my question is: If Councillor

00:25:48 Speaker 16: Greg, through the Municipal Act, as

00:25:51 Speaker 16: you know, the funding model is

00:25:53 Speaker 16: set out pretty clearly for municipalities

00:25:54 Speaker 16: funding libraries at at the local

00:25:58 Speaker 16: level. Have we looked into that

00:26:01 Speaker 16: as well, from a regional perspective?

00:26:09 Speaker 16: Okay, so I think the question

00:26:10 Speaker 16: is directed to the mover. I

00:26:14 Speaker 16: have not personally looked into that

00:26:16 Speaker 16: and the opportunities that may lay

00:26:18 Speaker 16: within. That would be something that

00:26:20 Speaker 16: I would hope would be flushed

00:26:21 Speaker 16: out during the process of the

00:26:23 Speaker 16: Services Committee evaluating it. Thank you.

00:26:30 Speaker 16: Okay, so I don't see any

00:26:31 Speaker 16: further hands online. I'll look around

00:26:33 Speaker 16: the room, and I see Councillor

00:26:35 Speaker 22: Eccles. Thank you. Well, I still

00:26:40 Speaker 20: have the scars from the last

00:26:41 Speaker 20: time that I suggested this, and

00:26:43 Speaker 20: that's got to be 15 years

00:26:45 Speaker 23: ago. Maybe we should have a

00:26:53 Speaker 23: county library system, and then somebody

00:26:54 Speaker 23: could read the code of conduct.

00:27:02 Speaker 23: Yeah. I'm not as concerned about

00:27:10 Speaker 23: the dollars that are in the

00:27:12 Speaker 23: library system at the present moment.

00:27:15 Speaker 23: Some 15 or more years ago,

00:27:16 Speaker 23: when I first suggested this, and

00:27:19 Speaker 24: it died rather quickly. It was

00:27:23 Speaker 24: around our county neighbors. Wellington County

00:27:27 Speaker 24: has a library system. Simcoe County,

00:27:30 Speaker 24: I believe, has a library system.

00:27:32 Speaker 24: I'm not sure about Dufferin. I

00:27:34 Speaker 24: believe Huron Valley City was there,

00:27:38 Speaker 24: one of our neighbors as well,

00:27:41 Speaker 24: too. And where it came from

00:27:42 Speaker 24: at that point in time was

00:27:44 Speaker 24: access to some of the individuals

00:27:47 Speaker 24: in the community of West Grey

00:27:50 Speaker 24: that lived closer to some of

00:27:51 Speaker 24: those boundaries. And we couldn't get

00:27:53 Speaker 24: an agreement with those two, at

00:27:57 Speaker 24: least two counties, to talk about.

00:28:00 Speaker 24: shared library service, as we were

00:28:03 Speaker 24: a lower tier service, and they

00:28:06 Speaker 24: were an upper tier, and they

00:28:08 Speaker 24: will not talk to a lower

00:28:10 Speaker 24: tier service. They weren't going to

00:28:12 Speaker 24: enter into a partnership. It still

00:28:14 Speaker 24: stands that way this today. So

00:28:17 Speaker 24: for that reason, to be able

00:28:20 Speaker 24: to work with our partners, not

00:28:23 Speaker 24: about as much about the dollar

00:28:25 Speaker 24: factor, but it is working and

00:28:27 Speaker 24: making access to libraries. by and

00:28:29 Speaker 24: for our community, that I would

00:28:32 Speaker 24: like to see this go forward

00:28:36 Speaker 24: and see what we can do

00:28:38 Speaker 24: with it. I will be supporting

00:28:39 Speaker 24: the motion. Okay, thank you. I

00:28:42 Speaker 24: can clarify that Simcoe County is

00:28:45 Speaker 24: not city, not county wide; it

00:28:47 Speaker 24: is lower tier, and we'll go

00:28:49 Speaker 24: to Councillor Nielsen online. Just a.

00:28:51 Speaker 24: Just unmute. Can you hear me

00:28:59 Speaker 24: now? Yes, we can. Thank you.

00:29:05 Speaker 24: My apologies for Microsoft. Just a

00:29:06 Speaker 24: quick question: If staff have a

00:29:08 Speaker 25: general idea, we have two hundred

00:29:10 Speaker 26: and fifty thousand dollars in the

00:29:11 Speaker 27: budget to do a study on

00:29:12 Speaker 27: garbage concepts. Is there an idea

00:29:15 Speaker 27: of what a study would cost

00:29:18 Speaker 27: to do this to carry through

00:29:19 Speaker 27: with this motion? Okay, we'll go

00:29:21 Speaker 27: to the CAO. Through you, Warden.

00:29:26 Speaker 27: Thank you for that question, Councilor

00:29:30 Speaker 27: Nielsen. I I do want to

00:29:32 Speaker 27: note that, and as as Councilor

00:29:34 Speaker 27: Eccles alluded to this, this this

00:29:36 Speaker 28: was reviewed back about twelve years

00:29:40 Speaker 28: ago, thirteen years ago. A report

00:29:43 Speaker 28: was brought forward in 2014, looking

00:29:44 Speaker 28: at at at this. At that

00:29:50 Speaker 28: time, former CEO Lance Thurston went

00:29:52 Speaker 28: through and did that that review.

00:29:55 Speaker 28: Followed. what what was called the

00:29:59 Speaker 28: collaborative decision making framework, and followed

00:30:01 Speaker 28: those steps. Did some analysis on

00:30:04 Speaker 28: the on the services at that

00:30:05 Speaker 28: time, and explored alternative models. So

00:30:09 Speaker 28: we do have some background information

00:30:10 Speaker 28: based on that previous review, recognizing

00:30:13 Speaker 28: it is about twelve thirteen years

00:30:15 Speaker 28: old. But there there are some

00:30:17 Speaker 28: findings that that came out of

00:30:18 Speaker 28: that that that we actually included

00:30:23 Speaker 28: that as part of our initial.

00:30:26 Speaker 28: report to the Joint Missile Services

00:30:28 Speaker 28: Committee, just as a bit of

00:30:29 Speaker 28: a framework in terms of what

00:30:31 Speaker 28: what services have been investigated and

00:30:33 Speaker 28: reviewed in the past, and again,

00:30:36 Speaker 28: staff will of course take direction

00:30:39 Speaker 28: from council regarding whether you want

00:30:42 Speaker 28: to review this matter further. However,

00:30:45 Speaker 28: similar to I think Councillor Nielsen's

00:30:48 Speaker 28: question in terms of the regional

00:30:51 Speaker 28: waste, based on the direction that's

00:30:52 Speaker 28: been provided by Joint Missile Services

00:30:54 Speaker 28: Committee. By Joint Mental Services Committee

00:30:56 Speaker 28: and supported by Council so far,

00:30:58 Speaker 28: there's three priority areas that that

00:31:00 Speaker 28: staff have been asked to to

00:31:02 Speaker 28: review, and and those are already

00:31:05 Speaker 28: in the those priority topics. So

00:31:08 Speaker 28: just cognizant in terms of of

00:31:10 Speaker 28: you know overall resources and capacity,

00:31:12 Speaker 28: whether or not this is something

00:31:14 Speaker 28: that staff could could review. If

00:31:16 Speaker 28: that's the case, it might take

00:31:18 Speaker 28: some time to review that topic,

00:31:21 Speaker 28: given the current workload and capacity.

00:31:23 Speaker 28: At the same time. you know

00:31:25 Speaker 28: there could be a consultant that's

00:31:27 Speaker 28: provided to to support this review.

00:31:28 Speaker 28: I don't know what the cost

00:31:31 Speaker 28: of that would be. We don't

00:31:33 Speaker 28: have any indicators in front of

00:31:34 Speaker 28: me at this point in time

00:31:35 Speaker 28: in terms of what that would

00:31:37 Speaker 28: look like. We'd be happy to

00:31:39 Speaker 28: to research that if the direction

00:31:40 Speaker 28: from council is to support this

00:31:42 Speaker 28: motion. We could bring that information

00:31:43 Speaker 28: back to the Joint Municipal Services

00:31:46 Speaker 28: Committee so they could have that

00:31:47 Speaker 28: that information. But this stage, I

00:31:50 Speaker 28: don't know what a consultant supported

00:31:53 Speaker 28: review would look like in terms

00:31:54 Speaker 28: of cost. Okay, thank you. Just

00:31:55 Speaker 28: before we go on to the

00:31:58 Speaker 28: next hand up, then. So for

00:31:59 Speaker 28: clarification, CAO, it should this motion

00:32:01 Speaker 29: pass the way that it is.

00:32:03 Speaker 29: You've identified that there that the

00:32:05 Speaker 29: Joint Services Committee has already identified

00:32:07 Speaker 29: three priorities. We we as a

00:32:09 Speaker 29: council have already supported putting some

00:32:10 Speaker 29: dollars behind that. So even if

00:32:13 Speaker 29: it were to be staff time,

00:32:14 Speaker 29: what would happen with this action

00:32:16 Speaker 29: if this is the direction that

00:32:17 Speaker 29: we provide the way that the

00:32:19 Speaker 29: notice of motion is written? Does

00:32:20 Speaker 29: that mean that it automates Does

00:32:22 Speaker 29: that mean that it automatically falls

00:32:23 Speaker 29: to the bottom of that queue

00:32:26 Speaker 29: and it becomes the fourth spot,

00:32:27 Speaker 29: or does the Joint Services Committee

00:32:29 Speaker 29: have some leverage to decide how

00:32:34 Speaker 29: they would like to allocate the

00:32:36 Speaker 29: time, staff time, as well as

00:32:38 Speaker 29: resources? Thank you, Gordon. A great

00:32:41 Speaker 29: question. With respect to to how

00:32:43 Speaker 28: it could play out if if

00:32:44 Speaker 28: Council supports this motion, how I

00:32:46 Speaker 28: would envision this at this stage

00:32:48 Speaker 28: is that staff would bring an

00:32:50 Speaker 28: initial report forward to the Joint

00:32:53 Speaker 28: Missile Service Committee based on. what

00:32:55 Speaker 28: was previously reviewed as part of

00:33:00 Speaker 28: the library services review, identifying what

00:33:02 Speaker 28: information was provided at that time

00:33:05 Speaker 28: and and and opportunities for efficiencies

00:33:07 Speaker 28: that were were identified and flagged

00:33:08 Speaker 28: at that time, but recommending that

00:33:11 Speaker 28: that rather than a countywide system

00:33:13 Speaker 28: was the end result of that

00:33:15 Speaker 28: study was to for the library

00:33:19 Speaker 28: boards to work together not only

00:33:20 Speaker 28: within the within within Gray County

00:33:22 Speaker 28: but the neighboring counties. and municipalities

00:33:25 Speaker 28: as well, so that was what

00:33:27 Speaker 28: was the end result in the

00:33:30 Speaker 28: recommendations at that stage. In terms

00:33:32 Speaker 28: of, and so we would bring

00:33:33 Speaker 28: that initial report forward. Obviously, further

00:33:35 Speaker 28: discussion today. In terms of, we're

00:33:38 Speaker 28: taking notes as as we speak.

00:33:41 Speaker 28: If it does get support, we

00:33:43 Speaker 28: would bring back further information for

00:33:44 Speaker 28: joint messrs to consider. That again,

00:33:47 Speaker 28: that committee makes recommendations to this

00:33:49 Speaker 28: council, so it would come back

00:33:51 Speaker 28: to this council in terms. of

00:33:53 Speaker 28: that review or that initial report,

00:33:55 Speaker 28: and and then seeking further council

00:33:57 Speaker 28: direction in terms of those pieces.

00:34:00 Speaker 28: So whether it's a consultant supported

00:34:02 Speaker 28: review and what the cost would

00:34:05 Speaker 28: be for that, or staff review

00:34:07 Speaker 28: and and rejuggling of priorities based

00:34:10 Speaker 28: on what the direction's been provided

00:34:11 Speaker 28: by council today, that are those

00:34:13 Speaker 28: are all options, I guess, that

00:34:16 Speaker 28: can be unpacked by first considered

00:34:18 Speaker 28: by joint municipal service committee, but

00:34:21 Speaker 28: then ultimately approved and supported by

00:34:23 Speaker 28: council. Okay, thank you very much

00:34:26 Speaker 28: for that clarification on procedure. We'll

00:34:29 Speaker 30: go to Councilor McQueen online. Good

00:34:32 Speaker 30: morning, Madam Warden, and good morning,

00:34:33 Speaker 30: County Council. A couple questions. Should

00:34:34 Speaker 30: we not do maybe certainly going

00:34:36 Speaker 30: back to the committee? I would

00:34:38 Speaker 30: see that they'd have further discussion,

00:34:41 Speaker 30: but would we not do a

00:34:42 Speaker 30: simple poll to see what the

00:34:46 Speaker 30: lower tier municipalities are interested in

00:34:48 Speaker 30: doing? I know that for us

00:34:52 Speaker 30: in Grey Highlands, we have. For

00:34:54 Speaker 30: us in Grayhavens, we have three

00:34:55 Speaker 30: different branches service our municipality, and

00:34:56 Speaker 30: so I don't know. I think

00:34:58 Speaker 30: in the past, maybe our CEO

00:34:59 Speaker 30: maybe have some information here as

00:35:00 Speaker 30: well. But I think the last

00:35:02 Speaker 30: time we went through this, they

00:35:04 Speaker 30: did get circulated to the lower

00:35:06 Speaker 30: tiers, and some were maybe in,

00:35:09 Speaker 30: and some were maybe out. But

00:35:11 Speaker 30: if you don't have a full

00:35:13 Speaker 30: buy-in from the lower tier, I

00:35:15 Speaker 30: know it's a budgetary item from

00:35:18 Speaker 30: the local municipality. Any thoughts on

00:35:21 Speaker 30: that? Like. like if there's if

00:35:22 Speaker 30: there's a a great interest in

00:35:23 Speaker 30: the lower tier, then. But if

00:35:24 Speaker 30: there isn't, I don't know how

00:35:26 Speaker 30: how far you want to you

00:35:28 Speaker 30: know. Have that discussion if the

00:35:31 Speaker 30: if if you don't have the

00:35:34 Speaker 30: buy-in from and maybe you do,

00:35:35 Speaker 30: but I think you should have

00:35:37 Speaker 30: that opportunity to maybe check that

00:35:38 Speaker 30: out. Thank you. Okay, I'll look

00:35:40 Speaker 28: to the CAO for a comment

00:35:42 Speaker 28: on that. Through you, Warden, and

00:35:45 Speaker 28: again, if this if this

00:35:48 Speaker 28: motion gets supported, that I would

00:35:51 Speaker 28: assume we'd be part of. the

00:35:53 Speaker 28: review. Is is having further discussions

00:35:55 Speaker 28: with each of the library managers,

00:35:58 Speaker 28: each of the the library boards,

00:36:01 Speaker 28: our our neighboring municipalities, neighboring counties,

00:36:03 Speaker 28: looking at what models that they

00:36:05 Speaker 28: have. So that would be part

00:36:07 Speaker 28: of the the potential review of

00:36:11 Speaker 28: of looking at that, and then

00:36:13 Speaker 28: seeing if there's there's feedback from

00:36:14 Speaker 28: each of the municipalities in terms

00:36:16 Speaker 28: of interest, in terms of again

00:36:20 Speaker 28: whether the option is to join

00:36:21 Speaker 28: a. county-wide library service model, or

00:36:24 Speaker 28: or if there's other opportunities or

00:36:26 Speaker 31: options, and or in terms of

00:36:28 Speaker 31: creating some efficiencies amongst amongst the

00:36:31 Speaker 31: library boards in terms of shared

00:36:33 Speaker 31: service. Hello, Councillor McQueen. Yes, thank

00:36:36 Speaker 31: you for that, and that's good

00:36:39 Speaker 32: information. I think also there's probably

00:36:42 Speaker 32: a bit of a science behind

00:36:44 Speaker 32: each branch of the each library

00:36:46 Speaker 32: branch or library location that services

00:36:49 Speaker 32: a certain area, because I know

00:36:51 Speaker 32: we. in Grey Highlands certainly service

00:36:53 Speaker 32: provide service for West Grey and

00:36:55 Speaker 32: Chatsworth, along with the town of

00:36:56 Speaker 32: Collingwood provides service for certain residents

00:36:58 Speaker 32: in Grey Highlands. So we do

00:36:59 Speaker 32: have some workings that do work

00:37:01 Speaker 32: with other libraries and other municipalities

00:37:02 Speaker 32: as well. So you know, I

00:37:04 Speaker 32: don't know in the sense of

00:37:06 Speaker 32: that report if it would reflect

00:37:07 Speaker 32: on the level of service and

00:37:11 Speaker 32: the area that it's serving. I

00:37:12 Speaker 32: think that you need to maybe

00:37:14 Speaker 32: identify where all the libraries are

00:37:16 Speaker 29: as well to. maybe look at

00:37:18 Speaker 29: what level service is happening throughout

00:37:20 Speaker 29: the county. Anyway, thank you. Okay,

00:37:22 Speaker 29: thank you. And I would add

00:37:24 Speaker 29: to the comments of Councilor Queen

00:37:27 Speaker 29: as well. It's not just the

00:37:28 Speaker 29: geography and the the accessibility of

00:37:30 Speaker 29: how people can get to resources

00:37:32 Speaker 29: and branches, but it's also the

00:37:34 Speaker 29: nature of each of our each

00:37:35 Speaker 29: of the nine municipalities' library services.

00:37:36 Speaker 29: In the example of the Town

00:37:38 Speaker 29: of Blue Mountains, it's a glam,

00:37:39 Speaker 29: it's a gallery library, archive, and

00:37:43 Speaker 29: museum, all governed under. the one

00:37:44 Speaker 29: thing, so that may not be

00:37:46 Speaker 29: the same in the case of

00:37:47 Speaker 29: all of the municipalities. So there

00:37:49 Speaker 29: would have to be some clarification

00:37:50 Speaker 29: on what was meant by library

00:37:51 Speaker 29: services. Okay, all right. So I

00:37:53 Speaker 29: don't see any further hands online.

00:37:56 Speaker 29: I don't see any hands around

00:37:58 Speaker 29: the room. So looks like we're

00:38:00 Speaker 29: ready to call for the vote.

00:38:06 Speaker 29: So the vote is to consider

00:38:08 Speaker 29: whether or not that the evaluation

00:38:09 Speaker 29: of the countywide library services should

00:38:11 Speaker 29: be considered by the joint municipal

00:38:12 Speaker 29: services committee. I will call the

00:38:14 Speaker 29: vote. All those in favor. Okay,

00:38:16 Speaker 29: and that. All right. Thank you

00:38:18 Speaker 29: very much. And we will move

00:38:22 Speaker 29: on. We have one delegation today,

00:38:26 Speaker 29: but we do actually have three

00:38:29 Speaker 29: visitors in order to support that

00:38:31 Speaker 29: delegation. So at this point in

00:38:35 Speaker 29: time, we'll direct our attention online

00:38:39 Speaker 29: because the presenters are there. And

00:38:40 Speaker 29: welcome, Mr. Maurice Boisette, and also

00:38:42 Speaker 29: Chuck Bouillon, and also Ken Brown.

00:38:45 Speaker 29: Oh, and I understand, Mr. Voisin,

00:38:50 Speaker 29: you'll be doing the presenting. Yes,

00:38:52 Speaker 29: yes. Okay, okay. Sorry, I'm being

00:38:53 Speaker 29: somebody's just. I, I, I'm, I'm

00:38:54 Speaker 29: wanting to call you, Monsieur Voisin,

00:38:55 Speaker 29: but I'm understanding is it is

00:38:57 Speaker 29: is a Voisin instead. Yes, yeah,

00:39:00 Speaker 29: that's fine. All right, so Mr.

00:39:02 Speaker 29: Voisin, welcome, and you have the

00:39:03 Speaker 29: floor. I know that you have

00:39:06 Speaker 29: your colleagues with you, and what

00:39:08 Speaker 29: we'll do is we'll listen to

00:39:10 Speaker 29: your presentation, and then I'll put

00:39:12 Speaker 33: it out for questions. for for

00:39:18 Speaker 33: clarification coming from council members and

00:39:19 Speaker 33: direct them to you. Thank you

00:39:23 Speaker 33: very much. Good morning and welcome,

00:39:24 Speaker 20: and thank you for your time

00:39:32 Speaker 20: this morning. So I'm I've tried

00:39:33 Speaker 20: to start to share my screen.

00:39:34 Speaker 20: Can you see that? No, we

00:39:36 Speaker 20: just see yourself at the moment.

00:39:38 Speaker 20: I'll just look. Okay. The clerk.

00:39:39 Speaker 20: Okay. The clerk is making an

00:39:41 Speaker 20: adjustment. Just give us a moment.

00:39:44 Speaker 20: Sure. Okay, so our communication staff

00:39:47 Speaker 20: are going to be sharing it

00:39:48 Speaker 20: from their stations. So then,

00:39:52 Speaker 20: when you're ready for the next

00:39:55 Speaker 33: slide, you can just say "next

00:39:57 Speaker 33: slide," and we'll advance it for

00:39:59 Speaker 33: you. Excellent. Thanks very much. So,

00:40:02 Speaker 33: wanted to talk about five things

00:40:04 Speaker 33: this morning. First of all, the

00:40:06 Speaker 33: agenda—it's a once-in-a-generation and all opportunity

00:40:08 Speaker 33: for Saugeen Hospice and Grey County.

00:40:11 Speaker 33: The need for Saugeen Hospice, because

00:40:17 Speaker 33: the rationale for that, what benefits

00:40:20 Speaker 33: there are to the community, and

00:40:22 Speaker 33: just the whole aspect of community

00:40:25 Speaker 33: leadership and the benefits to Grey

00:40:27 Speaker 33: and Bruce County Councils, and finally

00:40:30 Speaker 33: a call to action. So, next

00:40:32 Speaker 33: slide, please. So, we're asking Grey

00:40:34 Speaker 33: County's consideration, along with Bruce County,

00:40:37 Speaker 33: to for exclusive naming rights for

00:40:40 Speaker 33: the Family Reflection Room of Reflection

00:40:43 Speaker 33: room available for three hundred and

00:40:46 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollars combined for the

00:40:48 Speaker 33: two county councils for fifteen years.

00:40:51 Speaker 33: That's renewable. The family reflection room

00:40:56 Speaker 33: will serve as a comforting space

00:40:59 Speaker 33: for families, and it'll promote some

00:41:02 Speaker 33: some regional pride. It's basically the

00:41:04 Speaker 33: first room that you'll recognize when

00:41:09 Speaker 33: you come in, and we think

00:41:10 Speaker 33: it'll be quite well utilized. And

00:41:12 Speaker 33: next slide, please. This is a

00:41:15 Speaker 33: location of the of the family

00:41:17 Speaker 33: reflection room. So it is fairly

00:41:19 Speaker 33: central in the in the building

00:41:21 Speaker 33: at the new Sogin Hospice. And

00:41:25 Speaker 33: next slide, please. And this is

00:41:30 Speaker 33: the scene from the back. So

00:41:33 Speaker 33: all of the rooms look out

00:41:35 Speaker 33: to a very picturesque view of

00:41:37 Speaker 33: of an open field behind them,

00:41:39 Speaker 33: and the family reflection room is

00:41:42 Speaker 33: circled in green there. on your

00:41:44 Speaker 33: on your screen, and next slide,

00:41:47 Speaker 33: please. So our statistics are based

00:41:49 Speaker 33: on that the number of deaths

00:41:51 Speaker 33: in Graham Bruce annualized is around

00:41:53 Speaker 33: eighteen hundred people a year. That

00:41:55 Speaker 33: impacts close to nine thousand people.

00:41:58 Speaker 33: We do have an aging population,

00:42:00 Speaker 33: and according to Ontario Health West,

00:42:01 Speaker 33: over people over sixty five in

00:42:03 Speaker 33: ten years will make Five and

00:42:07 Speaker 33: ten years will make up more

00:42:11 Speaker 33: than one third of the populations

00:42:13 Speaker 33: in Grey and Bruce counties, which

00:42:15 Speaker 33: could result in lots of caregiver

00:42:18 Speaker 33: burnout, and certainly it's on the

00:42:22 Speaker 33: rise. So today in Grey Bruce,

00:42:24 Speaker 33: just to give you a snapshot,

00:42:28 Speaker 33: there's 12 active hospice residents beds

00:42:30 Speaker 33: for our population of about 175,000

00:42:32 Speaker 33: people, and based on at the

00:42:35 Speaker 33: bottom of the screen there, based

00:42:37 Speaker 33: on the 2024 Ontario Health West

00:42:40 Speaker 33: needs analysis. Grey Bruce requires 18

00:42:43 Speaker 33: hospice residence beds, so that's where

00:42:45 Speaker 33: the six beds comes from proposed

00:42:47 Speaker 33: for Saugeen Hospice. So the Saugeen

00:42:50 Speaker 33: Hospice will fill a critical gap

00:42:53 Speaker 33: of these six hospice residence beds

00:42:56 Speaker 33: that's been identified by Ontario Health

00:42:58 Speaker 33: West as that. The other benefits,

00:43:00 Speaker 33: and you can go to the

00:43:03 Speaker 33: next slide, please. You know, the

00:43:05 Speaker 33: it's closer to home. It fills

00:43:07 Speaker 33: that. critical gap of six additional

00:43:09 Speaker 33: hospice residence beds needed in Southern

00:43:12 Speaker 33: Gray Bruce. So closer to family,

00:43:14 Speaker 33: more time together, less travel for

00:43:17 Speaker 33: families. They mean means they can

00:43:20 Speaker 33: visit more often, stay longer without

00:43:21 Speaker 33: the strain of of lengthy commutes.

00:43:24 Speaker 33: You can see the how it

00:43:26 Speaker 33: kind of completes the picture of

00:43:31 Speaker 33: Gray Bruce at the the lower

00:43:33 Speaker 33: part of Gray and Bruce counties,

00:43:37 Speaker 33: and also closer to local community

00:43:45 Speaker 33: support. for that stronger emotional support

00:43:45 Speaker 33: for people that are transitioning, and

00:43:49 Speaker 33: the residents and their families can

00:43:52 Speaker 33: remain connected. Their faith groups can

00:43:54 Speaker 33: continue to visit them, and local

00:43:58 Speaker 33: counselors, while accessing Saugeen Hospice in

00:44:00 Speaker 33: dedicated grief and bereavement services. So

00:44:04 Speaker 33: it's really a dedicated service that

00:44:05 Speaker 33: that we're proposing. And next slide,

00:44:06 Speaker 33: please. So just to give you

00:44:10 Speaker 33: an idea, so Sogin Hospice was

00:44:13 Speaker 33: incorporated in 2021. It's a not-for-profit

00:44:17 Speaker 33: community corporation. The plan is to

00:44:22 Speaker 33: build a freestanding six-bed hospice in

00:44:24 Speaker 33: Southern Bruce County and East Ridge

00:44:28 Speaker 33: Park in Walkerton. Brockton has donated

00:44:31 Speaker 33: three acres of land, and that's

00:44:34 Speaker 33: the picture you see at the

00:44:35 Speaker 33: top of the of the screen.

00:44:38 Speaker 33: And we're anticipating welcoming. our first

00:44:40 Speaker 33: resident in the summer of 2028.

00:44:43 Speaker 33: So, and next slide, please. So

00:44:47 Speaker 33: this is kind of a aerial

00:44:49 Speaker 33: view of the of the of

00:44:50 Speaker 33: the Saugeen Hospice. You can see

00:44:53 Speaker 33: that we've incorporated a number of

00:44:55 Speaker 33: parking spaces on it. We hope

00:44:58 Speaker 33: that it becomes a training center.

00:45:00 Speaker 33: We hope that there are lots

00:45:01 Speaker 33: of visitors. We Lots of visitors.

00:45:05 Speaker 33: We've also considered our Amish and

00:45:07 Speaker 33: Mennonite neighbors, and there's three horse

00:45:11 Speaker 33: tie-ups in the at the edge

00:45:13 Speaker 33: of the parking lot for for

00:45:15 Speaker 33: their convenience. And and like I

00:45:16 Speaker 33: said, the the building, all of

00:45:18 Speaker 33: the rooms face a field at

00:45:20 Speaker 33: the back, so that that would

00:45:22 Speaker 33: be the scene when they would

00:45:25 Speaker 33: look out their their windows and

00:45:30 Speaker 33: their patios. There, we also have

00:45:35 Speaker 33: cuddle beds in the plan. so

00:45:37 Speaker 33: that individuals that are that are

00:45:39 Speaker 33: residents there can go out

00:45:42 Speaker 33: with the bed. It'll pass through

00:45:44 Speaker 33: the patio doors, and they can

00:45:46 Speaker 33: spend time on the patio to

00:45:48 Speaker 33: enjoy the sunshine and the view

00:45:49 Speaker 33: with their family members or their

00:45:51 Speaker 33: treasured pet, whatever whatever they desire.

00:45:56 Speaker 33: And next slide, please. So this

00:45:59 Speaker 33: is the opportunity, the the call

00:46:02 Speaker 33: to action. a three hundred and

00:46:03 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollar investment secures exclusive

00:46:05 Speaker 33: naming rights for the family reflection

00:46:08 Speaker 33: room for fifteen years. You can

00:46:17 Speaker 33: see to the left there that

00:46:19 Speaker 33: that they would be welcomed. That

00:46:20 Speaker 33: this was sponsored by Gray and

00:46:23 Speaker 33: Bruce County Councils, so high visibility,

00:46:26 Speaker 33: lots of media coverage as well

00:46:31 Speaker 33: as well as you know newsletters

00:46:33 Speaker 33: and Gray County and Bruce County

00:46:35 Speaker 33: would be recognized on our donor

00:46:39 Speaker 33: walls. and at community events as

00:46:43 Speaker 33: well. And next slide, please. So

00:46:50 Speaker 33: the family reflection room will become

00:46:53 Speaker 33: a place of comfort, respite, and

00:46:55 Speaker 33: regional pride. We envision that the

00:46:58 Speaker 33: room itself will have landmarks and

00:47:00 Speaker 33: pictures of local municipalities in both

00:47:01 Speaker 33: Gray and Bruce counties, so that

00:47:03 Speaker 33: and and the name. And and

00:47:05 Speaker 33: the names of the contributing municipalities

00:47:08 Speaker 33: as well as Gray and Bruce

00:47:11 Speaker 33: County. And next slide, please. And

00:47:13 Speaker 33: just that we'd like to consider

00:47:19 Speaker 33: local artwork and familiar landscapes, and

00:47:22 Speaker 33: to develop it into a real

00:47:25 Speaker 33: you know home-like atmosphere where piece

00:47:26 Speaker 33: of a resident is sleeping. The

00:47:29 Speaker 33: family will be able to come

00:47:32 Speaker 33: here for some. comfort and family

00:47:36 Speaker 33: time while they allow their family

00:47:38 Speaker 33: member to to rest and so

00:47:41 Speaker 33: this we think this will be

00:47:43 Speaker 33: a very well utilized part of

00:47:46 Speaker 33: Saugeen Hospital. And next slide, please.

00:47:48 Speaker 33: So this is just a little

00:47:51 Speaker 33: expansion that the family reflection room

00:47:52 Speaker 33: will be a place of comfort

00:47:55 Speaker 33: for respite and and also regional

00:47:58 Speaker 33: pride. elements would include paintings or

00:48:00 Speaker 33: photographs of familiar landscapes in Gray

00:48:04 Speaker 33: and Bruce counties. It'll have comfortable

00:48:05 Speaker 33: seating, armchairs, couches, and and some

00:48:10 Speaker 33: soft lighting to evoke that home

00:48:15 Speaker 33: atmosphere, and also some some you

00:48:18 Speaker 33: know reflective touches like bookshelves and

00:48:21 Speaker 33: quilts and a coffee and tea

00:48:24 Speaker 33: nook so people can refresh themselves

00:48:26 Speaker 33: and and and take a break.

00:48:30 Speaker 33: There will be a recognition wall

00:48:33 Speaker 33: with a plaque. and framed noting

00:48:35 Speaker 33: that this room was in place

00:48:38 Speaker 33: because of support from the county

00:48:40 Speaker 33: councils of Gray and Bruce. And

00:48:42 Speaker 33: next slide, please. So we're hoping

00:48:45 Speaker 33: that that there will be a

00:48:49 Speaker 33: shared sponsorship, a legacy in compassionate

00:48:51 Speaker 33: care. That the counties of Gray

00:48:53 Speaker 33: and Bruce will be recognized as

00:48:58 Speaker 33: being proactive. That they Active that

00:49:01 Speaker 33: they are fulfilling, providing dignity and

00:49:06 Speaker 33: compassionate end of life support for

00:49:09 Speaker 33: residents, and as well as providing

00:49:11 Speaker 33: support for local families. And that

00:49:14 Speaker 33: this is a response to a

00:49:19 Speaker 33: real local needs that's been identified

00:49:21 Speaker 33: by the Ontario West Health Association

00:49:26 Speaker 33: and making hospice residents care accessible

00:49:30 Speaker 33: as well as closer to home

00:49:33 Speaker 33: and closer to family. We certainly

00:49:35 Speaker 33: would. envision visible community recognition through

00:49:37 Speaker 33: plaques and donor materials, and also

00:49:39 Speaker 33: family gratitude. It provides a legacy

00:49:41 Speaker 33: of regional stewardship that we would

00:49:45 Speaker 33: want to build across both counties,

00:49:47 Speaker 33: and will lay the groundwork for

00:49:50 Speaker 33: future collaboration. And then finally, just

00:49:53 Speaker 33: wanted to touch on our call

00:49:55 Speaker 33: for action. So the Sogin Hospice

00:49:57 Speaker 33: Board respectfully requests that Gray County

00:49:59 Speaker 33: Council considers directing its treasurer to

00:50:01 Speaker 33: work collaboratively with the treasurer of

00:50:04 Speaker 33: Bruce County, and the joint effort

00:50:06 Speaker 33: would aim to develop a feasibility

00:50:10 Speaker 33: report detailing the financial and operational

00:50:11 Speaker 33: considerations of a three hundred and

00:50:13 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollar shared sponsorship for

00:50:15 Speaker 33: the family reflection room in the

00:50:18 Speaker 33: planned Sogin Hospice, and. This and

00:50:24 Speaker 33: just a note there: the the

00:50:25 Speaker 33: funding model may involve equal annual

00:50:27 Speaker 33: contributions from each county, spread over

00:50:28 Speaker 33: a term of one to five

00:50:31 Speaker 33: years, beginning in 2026. So it

00:50:33 Speaker 33: wouldn't necessarily have to be all

00:50:35 Speaker 33: at once in one year. And

00:50:37 Speaker 33: once the joint report is complete,

00:50:40 Speaker 33: it will be presented to both

00:50:42 Speaker 33: Graham Bruce County Councils for review

00:50:45 Speaker 33: and a formal vote by their

00:50:47 Speaker 33: respective councilors. So that's kind of.

00:50:49 Speaker 33: I think we were kind

00:50:51 Speaker 33: of allotted ten minutes to

00:50:55 Speaker 33: provide those slides. So that was

00:50:58 Speaker 33: a fairly quick review. But I

00:51:02 Speaker 33: would we would invite questions. Chuck

00:51:06 Speaker 33: is our business manager, and Ken

00:51:09 Speaker 33: Brown is the first vice chair

00:51:12 Speaker 33: of the Sogin Hospice Board. I

00:51:13 Speaker 33: recently joined the board in May

00:51:14 Speaker 33: and and live in Mildmay. And

00:51:16 Speaker 29: but I worked at Southeast Grey

00:51:18 Speaker 29: Support Services and in Council McQueen's

00:51:20 Speaker 29: area for twenty years. supporting adults

00:51:22 Speaker 29: with developmental disabilities, so well informed

00:51:24 Speaker 29: about the Gray County aspects of

00:51:25 Speaker 29: of this of our area. So

00:51:27 Speaker 29: open to questions, Madam Warden or

00:51:28 Speaker 29: councilors that you may have to

00:51:30 Speaker 29: follow up on the slides. Okay,

00:51:32 Speaker 29: thank you. And first of all,

00:51:35 Speaker 29: thank you for the service that

00:51:36 Speaker 29: you provide for our residents in

00:51:37 Speaker 29: both Gray and Boost Counties. We

00:51:39 Speaker 29: very much appreciate that. and thank

00:51:41 Speaker 29: you for sharing your detailed presentation

00:51:43 Speaker 29: to give us that information upfront.

00:51:45 Speaker 29: So I will, in a moment,

00:51:47 Speaker 29: just put it out to Council

00:51:49 Speaker 29: Committee, the whole members, if they

00:51:51 Speaker 29: have any questions, and I'll direct

00:51:53 Speaker 29: the questions to you, or perhaps

00:51:54 Speaker 29: maybe to one of your team.

00:51:56 Speaker 29: And normally, what we do is

00:51:57 Speaker 29: we don't pass a motion at

00:51:59 Speaker 29: the end of a delegation. In

00:52:03 Speaker 29: your particular case, you have indicated

00:52:06 Speaker 29: that there is an ask, a

00:52:10 Speaker 29: financial ask, that would require a

00:52:14 Speaker 29: motion to to ask for a

00:52:17 Speaker 29: staff report, for example. So that

00:52:19 Speaker 29: may happen at the end, depending

00:52:21 Speaker 29: on on how the committee, the

00:52:23 Speaker 29: whole, so wishes. So with that,

00:52:27 Speaker 29: I will put it out to

00:52:28 Speaker 29: questions. I'll look online for any

00:52:29 Speaker 29: hands raised, and I will look

00:52:33 Speaker 29: around the room. Okay, I'm not

00:52:37 Speaker 29: seeing any hands here in the

00:52:39 Speaker 29: room, and we'll begin with Doug

00:52:41 Speaker 29: Hutchinson online. Yes. Good morning, Warden

00:52:42 Speaker 33: and and staff. Question for Mister

00:52:44 Speaker 33: Foyzen. For Mr. Foyzen, you mentioned

00:52:46 Speaker 33: about the funding from Grey

00:52:51 Speaker 33: and Bruce Counties, and you also

00:52:56 Speaker 33: mentioned that Minto may be involved

00:52:58 Speaker 33: with some usage. Are you expecting

00:52:59 Speaker 33: funding from Minto or in some

00:53:01 Speaker 33: of the other regions in the

00:53:03 Speaker 29: area also? Yes, we we did

00:53:04 Speaker 29: a presentation for Minto Council back

00:53:05 Speaker 29: in October, and so asking them

00:53:08 Speaker 29: as well as a number of

00:53:09 Speaker 29: other municipalities that we went out

00:53:11 Speaker 29: just to give an update and

00:53:12 Speaker 29: let them know. Date and let

00:53:15 Speaker 29: them know that our building fund

00:53:17 Speaker 29: is active and consideration for budgetary

00:53:18 Speaker 29: consideration for 2026. Okay, thank you.

00:53:20 Speaker 29: Okay, thank you. I'll look around

00:53:22 Speaker 29: the room to see if there

00:53:25 Speaker 29: are further questions, and not seeing

00:53:26 Speaker 29: any in the room or online,

00:53:28 Speaker 29: I will just ask a question.

00:53:29 Speaker 29: I know that I've asked it

00:53:31 Speaker 29: before when when those when representation

00:53:32 Speaker 29: has come forward, and it's just

00:53:35 Speaker 29: a good opportunity for members of

00:53:37 Speaker 29: the public following along to understand

00:53:38 Speaker 29: as well. in the map it

00:53:40 Speaker 29: shows it shows your locations and

00:53:41 Speaker 29: where you hope to expand into

00:53:43 Speaker 29: your location, and it is wonderful

00:53:45 Speaker 29: that you're looking to to do

00:53:47 Speaker 29: that, extend your service. As the

00:53:49 Speaker 29: mayor of the Blue Mountains over

00:53:51 Speaker 29: in the east side of the

00:53:52 Speaker 29: county, we do a lot of

00:53:57 Speaker 29: work with Georgian Triangle Hospice. So

00:54:00 Speaker 29: I just wonder if you could

00:54:04 Speaker 29: just explain what the relationship is

00:54:08 Speaker 29: between the hospices around the region

00:54:10 Speaker 34: in order to make sure that

00:54:12 Speaker 34: we're doing a wraparound opportunity for

00:54:16 Speaker 34: all residents in Gray County to

00:54:18 Speaker 34: find. some some place close to

00:54:20 Speaker 34: home, as you're trying to do

00:54:22 Speaker 34: further south in our county. Yeah,

00:54:25 Speaker 34: for to Chuck to answer

00:54:29 Speaker 34: that, I think Kim can handle

00:54:33 Speaker 34: that because he's been part of

00:54:35 Speaker 34: this for 12 years. Yeah. Okay,

00:54:37 Speaker 34: we've been working discussing this with

00:54:40 Speaker 34: Chapman House here in Shores Hospice

00:54:42 Speaker 34: and Gray Bruce Hospice. Originally spearheaded

00:54:44 Speaker 34: this project, this was going to

00:54:46 Speaker 34: be a satellite of Chapman of

00:54:48 Speaker 34: Gray Bruce Hospice, along with Chapman

00:54:52 Speaker 34: House, but we took over about

00:54:55 Speaker 34: four years ago. We haven't been

00:54:57 Speaker 34: doing a great deal because while

00:55:00 Speaker 34: Chapman House is providing the service

00:55:02 Speaker 34: presently, we're still focusing on organizing

00:55:03 Speaker 34: infrastructure, government relations, the build. So

00:55:05 Speaker 34: it will be. It won't be

00:55:07 Speaker 29: for another year until we've got

00:55:09 Speaker 29: something concrete to offer. that we'll

00:55:11 Speaker 29: be reaching out formally to the

00:55:14 Speaker 29: other two hospices to see how

00:55:20 Speaker 29: we can work together. Right now,

00:55:24 Speaker 29: we're strictly on paper, but we

00:55:26 Speaker 34: are looking forward to working closely

00:55:28 Speaker 34: with them when we have shovels

00:55:29 Speaker 34: in the ground and we're getting

00:55:30 Speaker 34: closer to opening. Okay, thank you.

00:55:32 Speaker 34: So, just to clarify, then, when

00:55:33 Speaker 29: you say the other two, you

00:55:35 Speaker 29: mean Chapin House and the one

00:55:36 Speaker 29: that's located in Collingwood, because that

00:55:38 Speaker 29: is the one that. that no,

00:55:39 Speaker 29: I was saying here in Shores

00:55:42 Speaker 29: in Tiverton. Okay, we haven't had

00:55:44 Speaker 29: any correspondence with Collingwood yet, but

00:55:45 Speaker 29: we will once we. Okay. Okay.

00:55:47 Speaker 29: Thank you very much. That that

00:55:48 Speaker 29: is very helpful. Okay. So with

00:55:50 Speaker 29: that, then I'll just look to

00:55:51 Speaker 29: council to many of the whole

00:55:53 Speaker 29: members to see if there is

00:55:54 Speaker 29: a will to do a motion.

00:55:57 Speaker 29: It does say that you're here

00:55:58 Speaker 29: early in your plans, which is

00:56:00 Speaker 29: always. very helpful for us to

00:56:01 Speaker 29: be able to follow through and

00:56:04 Speaker 29: follow through on the progress. And

00:56:07 Speaker 29: I'm not seeing any hands to

00:56:09 Speaker 29: make a motion, so it looks

00:56:11 Speaker 29: like we will just will will

00:56:12 Speaker 29: take this information away with us.

00:56:14 Speaker 29: And then, as if you keep

00:56:15 Speaker 29: in touch with our with our

00:56:17 Speaker 29: county staff as you get closer

00:56:19 Speaker 29: to particular moments in time where

00:56:22 Speaker 29: you really do need to ask

00:56:24 Speaker 29: about commitments into the next year,

00:56:25 Speaker 29: and then we'll be able to

00:56:27 Speaker 29: entertain information coming from staff about

00:56:30 Speaker 29: that. So, thank you very much.

00:56:32 Speaker 29: Thank you. Thank you very much.

00:56:33 Speaker 29: Okay. Thank you. So that concludes

00:56:35 Speaker 29: all of our delegations for this

00:56:37 Speaker 29: morning. So we will move on

00:56:39 Speaker 29: to item five, which would be

00:56:40 Speaker 29: the call for consentage items that

00:56:44 Speaker 29: need to be pulled. There are

00:56:50 Speaker 29: eleven items in item six that

00:56:51 Speaker 29: are scheduled on the consent agenda.

00:56:53 Speaker 29: Eleven items going down to six

00:56:54 Speaker 29: K. So I will just ask

00:56:56 Speaker 29: now for any hands to be

00:56:59 Speaker 29: raised on any items in the

00:57:00 Speaker 29: consent agenda that somebody wishes to

00:57:02 Speaker 29: have a separate discussion for. I

00:57:03 Speaker 29: know there is a. relationship in

00:57:05 Speaker 29: in terms of the correspondence that

00:57:07 Speaker 29: came with regards to the conservation

00:57:09 Speaker 29: authorities, but of course we have

00:57:10 Speaker 29: that topic coming up later in

00:57:12 Speaker 29: our in our items for discussion

00:57:15 Speaker 29: already. Okay, I do not see

00:57:17 Speaker 29: any hands up, Madam Clerk, for

00:57:24 Speaker 29: any items to be pulled from

00:57:26 Speaker 29: those eleven items. So in that

00:57:34 Speaker 29: case, then it's recommended that the

00:57:36 Speaker 29: following consent agenda items be received,

00:57:37 Speaker 29: and that staff be authorized to

00:57:39 Speaker 29: take the action. Be authorized to

00:57:41 Speaker 29: take the actions necessary to give

00:57:43 Speaker 29: effect to the recommendations in the

00:57:45 Speaker 29: staff reports, and that correspondence be

00:57:48 Speaker 29: supported or received for information as

00:57:51 Speaker 29: recommended in the consent agenda.

00:57:53 Speaker 29: May I ask for a move?

00:57:56 Speaker 29: Move by the Deputy Warden, seconded

00:57:57 Speaker 29: by Councillor Dickert. Any discussion? All

00:57:59 Speaker 29: those in favour? And that motion

00:58:02 Speaker 29: is carried. Madam Clerk. Right. Doing

00:58:04 Speaker 29: well for time. We will move

00:58:07 Speaker 29: on. Two items for discussion. So

00:58:09 Speaker 29: the first item to get on

00:58:12 Speaker 29: the floor for discussion. It's recommended

00:58:14 Speaker 29: that the Budget and Finance Committee

00:58:17 Speaker 29: meeting minutes, dated November twenty six,

00:58:20 Speaker 29: twenty twenty five, be adopted as

00:58:22 Speaker 29: presented, and the following resolutions contained

00:58:25 Speaker 29: therein be endorsed. Number one, that

00:58:28 Speaker 29: report FRBFC twenty two twenty five

00:58:30 Speaker 29: regarding corporate financial update as September

00:58:32 Speaker 29: thirtieth be received for information, and

00:58:35 Speaker 29: number two, that the thirty thousand

00:58:36 Speaker 29: dollar expenditure. for the social pinpoint

00:58:39 Speaker 29: be referred to county council for

00:58:41 Speaker 29: further discussion in the 2026 budget

00:58:43 Speaker 29: discussions. Number three, that the matter

00:58:45 Speaker 29: regarding the proposed increase to asset

00:58:47 Speaker 29: management reserve contributions for 2026 be

00:58:49 Speaker 29: referred to county council during the

00:58:51 Speaker 29: 2026 budget discussions. Number four, regarding

00:58:52 Speaker 29: the possibility of the GTR GTR

00:58:54 Speaker 29: fare increases, be referred to county

00:58:56 Speaker 29: council 2026 budget discussions. And number

00:58:57 Speaker 29: five, that the report F. That

00:59:01 Speaker 29: the report FRBFC twenty four twenty

00:59:02 Speaker 29: five regarding the twenty twenty six

00:59:05 Speaker 29: draft budget be received, and that

00:59:07 Speaker 29: finally number six that the twenty

00:59:09 Speaker 29: twenty six draft budget be presented

00:59:11 Speaker 29: and be forwarded to county council

00:59:13 Speaker 29: for consideration. So this, of course,

00:59:15 Speaker 29: these were these were minutes that

00:59:17 Speaker 29: were done at a very close

00:59:19 Speaker 29: knit in terms of timeline. Meeting

00:59:20 Speaker 29: the budget and finance committee met

00:59:22 Speaker 29: on November twenty six, and then

00:59:26 Speaker 29: right next week we are already

00:59:28 Speaker 29: discussing the budget, and here we

00:59:30 Speaker 29: are gathered. ready, and poised to

00:59:34 Speaker 29: do our second part of the

00:59:35 Speaker 29: discussions tomorrow. So these items here,

00:59:37 Speaker 29: this is just simply to be

00:59:41 Speaker 29: receiving the minutes and the the

00:59:45 Speaker 29: motions that were contained therein, which

00:59:48 Speaker 29: is something we're already acting on.

00:59:51 Speaker 29: So any discussion about these items

00:59:53 Speaker 29: should really be reserved for tomorrow.

00:59:55 Speaker 29: Tomorrow during the day, as we

00:59:59 Speaker 29: crack open the draft budget and

01:00:01 Speaker 29: continue with our deliberations. So with

01:00:07 Speaker 29: that, I'll ask for a mover

01:00:08 Speaker 29: and a seconder. Move by Councillor

01:00:11 Speaker 29: Mackey. Seconder. Seconded, seconded by Councillor

01:00:13 Speaker 29: Carlton, to receive these minutes and

01:00:17 Speaker 29: the motions that are contained therein.

01:00:19 Speaker 29: Is there any discussion? Okay. Seeing

01:00:21 Speaker 29: no hands, then I will call

01:00:23 Speaker 29: the vote. All those in favor,

01:00:26 Speaker 29: and that motion is carried. Thank

01:00:28 Speaker 29: you. Okay. So the next one

01:00:31 Speaker 29: required for discussion is item seven

01:00:33 Speaker 29: B, and it is recommended that

01:00:35 Speaker 29: PDR CW seventy twenty. CW 7025

01:00:37 Speaker 29: be received, and that county staff

01:00:40 Speaker 29: be directed to submit report PDR

01:00:43 Speaker 29: CW 7025 as the County of

01:00:45 Speaker 29: Grey comments on on environmental registry

01:00:47 Speaker 29: posting 0251257, and that the County

01:00:50 Speaker 29: of Grey requests assurance from

01:00:52 Speaker 29: the province that the establishment of

01:00:55 Speaker 29: the new provincial Ontario provincial conservation

01:00:57 Speaker 29: agency will will not be funded

01:00:59 Speaker 29: by the municipal portion of the

01:01:03 Speaker 29: conservation authority levies. and that it

01:01:06 Speaker 29: will not be funded by from

01:01:06 Speaker 29: current Conservation Authority budgets, and that

01:01:11 Speaker 29: Grey County requests that the province

01:01:13 Speaker 29: pause on passing any further changes

01:01:15 Speaker 29: to the Conservation Authority structure until

01:01:16 Speaker 29: further analysis has been conducted and

01:01:18 Speaker 29: additional details are released on the

01:01:22 Speaker 29: new proposed models, and that Report

01:01:24 Speaker 29: PDR CW seventy twenty five be

01:01:26 Speaker 29: shared with members of Provincial Parliament

01:01:28 Speaker 29: Paul Vickers and Brian Sanderson, as

01:01:29 Speaker 29: well as member municipalities aim. Member

01:01:31 Speaker 29: municipalities, AMO, and conservation authorities having

01:01:32 Speaker 29: jurisdiction in Gray County, and that

01:01:34 Speaker 29: staff be authorized to carry out

01:01:36 Speaker 29: the above prior to county council

01:01:40 Speaker 29: approval, as per Section 26.6B of

01:01:42 Speaker 29: the Procedural Bylaw 51.513422. So, with

01:01:43 Speaker 29: that, may I ask for a

01:01:45 Speaker 29: mover and a seconder to get

01:01:47 Speaker 29: it on the floor? Okay. It's

01:01:50 Speaker 29: moved by Councilor Gregg, seconded by

01:01:51 Speaker 29: Councilor Dobrin. It's now on the

01:01:53 Speaker 29: floor for discussion. So, I. do

01:01:55 Speaker 29: know that Deputy CAO, the Deputy

01:01:57 Speaker 29: CAO, and Director Taylor will be

01:02:02 Speaker 29: presenting some information with a slideshow.

01:02:04 Speaker 29: I do recognize that CAO Tim

01:02:05 Speaker 29: Lanthier is also present in the

01:02:06 Speaker 29: room with additional expertise that may

01:02:08 Speaker 29: come in handy in terms of

01:02:10 Speaker 35: the discussion. Thank you very much

01:02:11 Speaker 35: for spending your time here today.

01:02:13 Speaker 35: And is Jennifer Vincent? No. Okay.

01:02:15 Speaker 35: There. I'm sorry. Oh. Okay. There

01:02:17 Speaker 35: you go. Sorry, I didn't see

01:02:20 Speaker 35: you there behind the chair. Okay.

01:02:22 Speaker 35: We also have representation from Saugatuck.

01:02:24 Speaker 35: Also have representation from Sogee Valley,

01:02:25 Speaker 35: the general manager. General manager, so

01:02:28 Speaker 35: thank you very much for both

01:02:30 Speaker 35: of you being present here today.

01:02:33 Speaker 35: I will turn it over,

01:02:35 Speaker 35: turn to the lectern for the

01:02:37 Speaker 35: WCAO. Good morning, Warden. Good morning,

01:02:39 Speaker 35: members of County Council, and through

01:02:41 Speaker 35: you, I'm going to go through

01:02:42 Speaker 35: a slide deck which highlights some

01:02:45 Speaker 35: of the key parts from the

01:02:46 Speaker 35: report. I recognize it's a fairly

01:02:49 Speaker 35: lengthy report that's in front of

01:02:51 Speaker 35: you today. It's been drawn together

01:02:54 Speaker 35: through some collaboration both within Gray

01:02:58 Speaker 35: County. Collaboration both within Grey County,

01:03:00 Speaker 35: with some of our member municipalities,

01:03:02 Speaker 35: and as indicated, with conservation authorities

01:03:05 Speaker 35: that that have a role

01:03:08 Speaker 35: to play within within Grey County.

01:03:09 Speaker 35: So I'm I'm hoping to pull

01:03:11 Speaker 35: out some of the the finer

01:03:12 Speaker 35: elements of the report to to

01:03:14 Speaker 35: highlight those for councils awareness. So,

01:03:17 Speaker 35: so a quick bit of background:

01:03:18 Speaker 35: conservation authorities are formed underneath the

01:03:20 Speaker 35: Conservation Authorities Act, that was passed

01:03:22 Speaker 35: in 1946. It hasn't been a

01:03:25 Speaker 35: static act by any stretch of

01:03:27 Speaker 35: imagination, and has gone through

01:03:28 Speaker 35: successive. changes, including one of the

01:03:30 Speaker 35: most notable ones, which was probably

01:03:33 Speaker 35: in 1954, after following Hurricane Hazel.

01:03:36 Speaker 35: The Act has been strengthened and

01:03:38 Speaker 35: changed, and and focused over various

01:03:39 Speaker 35: different points in time. Most recently,

01:03:41 Speaker 35: to introduce a single mandate for

01:03:42 Speaker 35: a single policy regulation for all

01:03:45 Speaker 35: 36 conservation authorities, and to introduce

01:03:46 Speaker 35: some key performance indicators that conservation

01:03:48 Speaker 35: authorities need to report to the

01:03:51 Speaker 35: province on. That's important because it's

01:03:53 Speaker 35: one of the. things that the

01:03:55 Speaker 35: the provincial proposals in front of

01:03:57 Speaker 35: us today are actually indicating are

01:04:00 Speaker 35: are seeking to address. And so

01:04:02 Speaker 35: some of that stuff is already

01:04:04 Speaker 35: within the act. The act has

01:04:08 Speaker 35: been changed by the current provincial

01:04:09 Speaker 35: government in order to help address

01:04:11 Speaker 35: some of the development priorities that

01:04:15 Speaker 35: they've indicated, including the building of

01:04:17 Speaker 35: one and a half million new

01:04:19 Speaker 35: homes. They are unique in many

01:04:21 Speaker 35: respects as a as a as

01:04:24 Speaker 35: an agency and as a body.

01:04:28 Speaker 35: They are formed at the request

01:04:31 Speaker 35: of their member municipalities. So

01:04:33 Speaker 35: the Act creates a legislative environment

01:04:35 Speaker 35: for a conservation to be a

01:04:37 Speaker 35: conservation authority to be formed,

01:04:40 Speaker 35: but the conservation authority being formed

01:04:42 Speaker 35: is a municipal process. It's embedded

01:04:44 Speaker 35: in local municipalities who have the

01:04:48 Speaker 35: voice to request the establishment

01:04:50 Speaker 35: of a conservation authority, have the

01:04:53 Speaker 35: ability to request the amalgamation, growth,

01:04:56 Speaker 35: change of mandate of a conservation

01:04:58 Speaker 35: authority, and have the ability

01:05:02 Speaker 35: to request the dissolution of a

01:05:03 Speaker 35: conservation. authority. So, whilst they are

01:05:04 Speaker 35: formed by provincial legislation and operate

01:05:06 Speaker 35: within a legislative context and have

01:05:09 Speaker 35: reporting relationships to ministries, which has

01:05:12 Speaker 35: changed over time, they are in

01:05:14 Speaker 35: essence formed at the request, changed

01:05:16 Speaker 35: at the request of the member

01:05:18 Speaker 35: municipalities. That is structured through boards

01:05:19 Speaker 35: of governance, which currently represent just

01:05:21 Speaker 35: member municipalities. Again, a change which

01:05:24 Speaker 35: has strengthened municipal voices over recent

01:05:25 Speaker 35: years around. the conservation authority tables,

01:05:28 Speaker 35: again, that's important because some of

01:05:31 Speaker 35: the changes that are being proposed

01:05:34 Speaker 35: actually shake the change that fundamental

01:05:36 Speaker 35: relationship between municipalities and conservation authorities

01:05:37 Speaker 35: by introducing a new provincial oversight

01:05:38 Speaker 35: body, which has fairly significant powers

01:05:40 Speaker 35: of control over the work of

01:05:41 Speaker 35: of local municipal local conservation authorities.

01:05:44 Speaker 35: So there's 36 of them in

01:05:45 Speaker 35: the province at this point in

01:05:48 Speaker 35: time. As I say. there's a

01:05:50 Speaker 35: history of amalgamations, a history of

01:05:54 Speaker 35: conservation authorities being created and changed

01:05:56 Speaker 35: over time. But currently, there are

01:05:57 Speaker 35: 36 of them. Once again, they're

01:06:00 Speaker 35: established at the request of

01:06:03 Speaker 35: member municipalities. And in Grey County,

01:06:05 Speaker 35: at the minute, there are four

01:06:08 Speaker 35: operating conservation authorities: Saugeen and Grey-Swobbel

01:06:11 Speaker 35: being the two largest, but we

01:06:12 Speaker 35: do have Grand River Conservation Authority

01:06:13 Speaker 35: in the south and Nottawasaga, obviously,

01:06:15 Speaker 35: over towards the east. One of

01:06:18 Speaker 35: the other things, which is perhaps

01:06:20 Speaker 35: a little bit silent in some

01:06:23 Speaker 35: of the materials coming from the

01:06:25 Speaker 35: province, but we feel is an

01:06:27 Speaker 35: important part of this conversation, is

01:06:28 Speaker 35: source water protection. As we know,

01:06:30 Speaker 35: in in Grey and Bruce counties,

01:06:31 Speaker 35: and particularly within Grey, we have

01:06:33 Speaker 35: a very strong reliance on groundwater

01:06:35 Speaker 35: and water supplies, which residents pull

01:06:37 Speaker 35: through wells and and rely on

01:06:39 Speaker 35: for their drinking water. And so,

01:06:43 Speaker 35: source water protection is a body

01:06:44 Speaker 35: of work which sits very closely

01:06:46 Speaker 35: aligned with. conservation authorities, and in

01:06:49 Speaker 35: Grey County we have one, two

01:06:50 Speaker 35: source water protection regions and two

01:06:54 Speaker 35: source water protection committees, and so

01:06:55 Speaker 35: that's the fine lines and the

01:06:59 Speaker 35: thicker lines on this map

01:07:02 Speaker 35: in front of you, and they

01:07:06 Speaker 35: help manage and ensure risks are

01:07:09 Speaker 35: managed to source water

01:07:11 Speaker 35: protection areas. So they define areas

01:07:13 Speaker 35: where there are risks for water

01:07:14 Speaker 35: public water supplies and help to

01:07:16 Speaker 35: manage those. And again, that work

01:07:19 Speaker 35: is very closely aligned with the

01:07:20 Speaker 35: work of conservation authorities. at this

01:07:21 Speaker 35: time, and it is unclear in

01:07:23 Speaker 35: some of the provincial recommendations where

01:07:25 Speaker 35: source water protection would sit and

01:07:27 Speaker 35: how that would be managed on

01:07:29 Speaker 35: a go-forward basis. So the proposed

01:07:31 Speaker 35: changes that are in front of

01:07:33 Speaker 35: us by the province are break

01:07:35 Speaker 35: down into essentially two parts. And

01:07:38 Speaker 35: the first part is the formation

01:07:39 Speaker 35: of a new provincial conservation agency.

01:07:41 Speaker 35: This would be to undertake

01:07:43 Speaker 35: some strategic management and leadership of

01:07:46 Speaker 35: newly formed regional conservation authorities. This

01:07:49 Speaker 35: provincial body would sit alongside the

01:07:51 Speaker 35: municipalities, ministries in the province, which

01:07:54 Speaker 35: conservation authorities already have relationships with.

01:07:56 Speaker 35: At this point in time,

01:07:57 Speaker 35: it would be MECP. It's been

01:08:00 Speaker 35: MNRF in the past, but currently

01:08:02 Speaker 35: MECP that they work with. It

01:08:04 Speaker 35: would be governed by a board

01:08:05 Speaker 35: of five to twelve. There's no

01:08:07 Speaker 35: real clarity on how that board

01:08:10 Speaker 35: would be selected or how that

01:08:11 Speaker 35: board would be representative of the

01:08:13 Speaker 35: work of conservation. authorities across the

01:08:16 Speaker 35: province, and there's some information around

01:08:17 Speaker 35: what the expectations of that provincial

01:08:18 Speaker 35: agency would be, which is

01:08:21 Speaker 35: as general as providing broad oversight,

01:08:23 Speaker 35: but also goes down as far

01:08:26 Speaker 35: as indicating that they would have

01:08:27 Speaker 35: control over how conservation authorities procure

01:08:29 Speaker 35: items and and the work that

01:08:31 Speaker 35: conservation authorities do. So, as its

01:08:33 Speaker 35: pace posted at the minute, that

01:08:35 Speaker 35: provincial conservation body would have fairly

01:08:38 Speaker 35: broad suite of powers and influence

01:08:40 Speaker 35: over. the work that conservation authorities

01:08:41 Speaker 35: would do. It's indicated by the

01:08:43 Speaker 35: province that this board would be

01:08:46 Speaker 35: funded by the conservation authorities at

01:08:51 Speaker 35: this point in time, or have

01:08:52 Speaker 35: the ability to levy its costs

01:08:53 Speaker 35: out to conservation authorities. And so,

01:08:55 Speaker 35: it's unclear how much that would

01:08:58 Speaker 35: cost and how exactly that would

01:08:59 Speaker 35: trickle down. Further, the second part

01:09:02 Speaker 35: of the proposals that sit in

01:09:03 Speaker 35: front of us is the amalgamation

01:09:06 Speaker 35: of the thirty-six existing conservation

01:09:09 Speaker 35: authorities into what are being called

01:09:11 Speaker 35: regional conservation authorities. or RCAs, and

01:09:14 Speaker 35: there would be seven of those

01:09:16 Speaker 35: that they've been proposed at this

01:09:18 Speaker 35: point in time. It's worth indicating

01:09:21 Speaker 35: that repeatedly the province has indicated

01:09:25 Speaker 35: there are no changes to services,

01:09:27 Speaker 35: there are no job losses, and

01:09:29 Speaker 35: will do will continue to be

01:09:32 Speaker 35: the same tomorrow as it is

01:09:33 Speaker 35: today, just with these new regional

01:09:35 Speaker 35: structures and this new conservation agency

01:09:38 Speaker 35: at the provincial level. So, as

01:09:40 Speaker 35: I mentioned at the beginning of

01:09:43 Speaker 35: the presentation, there are key. At

01:09:44 Speaker 35: the presentation, there are key performance

01:09:45 Speaker 35: indicators already in place for conservation

01:09:47 Speaker 35: authorities, which are required to be

01:09:49 Speaker 35: reported to the province on an

01:09:52 Speaker 35: annualized basis. So, one of

01:09:54 Speaker 35: the one of the drivers behind

01:09:56 Speaker 35: this change is to instigate consistency

01:09:58 Speaker 35: and performance consistent performance across the

01:10:01 Speaker 35: province of Ontario. And so, just

01:10:06 Speaker 35: to reiterate, a few years ago,

01:10:08 Speaker 35: all thirty six conservation authorities had

01:10:10 Speaker 35: slightly different regulations. They had their

01:10:12 Speaker 35: own founding regulations, which informed how

01:10:13 Speaker 35: they managed natural hazards in their

01:10:15 Speaker 35: watershed and guided how and where

01:10:17 Speaker 35: they permitted were able to permit

01:10:19 Speaker 35: development. That was standardised a number

01:10:22 Speaker 35: of years ago. We now have

01:10:24 Speaker 35: a single regulation that all 36

01:10:27 Speaker 35: conservation authorities operate under, and they're

01:10:29 Speaker 35: required to meet timelines for permit

01:10:31 Speaker 35: approvals under that. And I detailed

01:10:33 Speaker 35: what they are, but basically there's

01:10:34 Speaker 35: a 30 and a 60 day,

01:10:36 Speaker 35: a 30 and a 90 day

01:10:38 Speaker 35: window that they have to review

01:10:40 Speaker 35: completed permit. applications and make those

01:10:44 Speaker 35: decisions. Double-checked with the two conservation

01:10:46 Speaker 35: authorities that are in the in

01:10:48 Speaker 35: the room today as we prepared

01:10:49 Speaker 35: the report today. And in 2024,

01:10:52 Speaker 35: GSCA attained more than 99 compliance

01:10:54 Speaker 35: with those targets and met 100

01:10:55 Speaker 35: of the major permits. So they're

01:11:01 Speaker 35: they're meeting those KPIs. And whilst

01:11:02 Speaker 35: I didn't get the information from

01:11:04 Speaker 35: Eric in time to include with

01:11:06 Speaker 35: this, the story is very similar

01:11:08 Speaker 35: within Sorging. And in fact, the

01:11:11 Speaker 35: 30 and the 90-day window is

01:11:14 Speaker 35: is that can sometimes feel like

01:11:18 Speaker 35: it's taking 29 or 89 days,

01:11:19 Speaker 35: and they're achieving those targets. It's

01:11:22 Speaker 35: usually they are significantly quicker than

01:11:24 Speaker 35: that. And in fact, in Sorgine

01:11:25 Speaker 35: and Eric, please correct me if

01:11:28 Speaker 35: I'm wrong. I believe the average

01:11:31 Speaker 35: permit time is about four days,

01:11:32 Speaker 35: and so these permits are being

01:11:35 Speaker 35: processed and reviewed quite promptly. The

01:11:37 Speaker 35: province has also taken a strong

01:11:40 Speaker 35: control in terms of planning

01:11:44 Speaker 35: fees, and so again. these have

01:11:46 Speaker 35: been largely taken out of the

01:11:49 Speaker 35: control of local conservation authorities, and

01:11:51 Speaker 35: we are, I think, entering into

01:11:53 Speaker 35: the third year of a planning

01:11:55 Speaker 35: permit fee freeze. So, what are

01:11:58 Speaker 35: we looking at in terms of

01:12:00 Speaker 35: the new areas? So, Grey County

01:12:02 Speaker 35: would be part of two of

01:12:04 Speaker 35: the new regional conservation authorities, or

01:12:07 Speaker 35: RCAs, the Huron Superior RCA and

01:12:10 Speaker 35: the Lake Erie RCA. Southgate, as

01:12:11 Speaker 35: a member municipality, would also be

01:12:14 Speaker 35: part of both the two

01:12:15 Speaker 35: new regional conservation authorities. So it's

01:12:17 Speaker 35: not that Grey County and all

01:12:19 Speaker 35: of its member municipalities go from

01:12:22 Speaker 35: having multiple conservation authorities to having

01:12:26 Speaker 35: just one. We are still have

01:12:27 Speaker 35: two that cover Grey County, and

01:12:30 Speaker 35: our member municipalities at times also

01:12:32 Speaker 35: have more than one. The amalgamation

01:12:33 Speaker 35: would see for Lake Erie eight

01:12:35 Speaker 35: existing conservation authorities combined, and they

01:12:38 Speaker 35: would. serve under Lake Erie. Around

01:12:40 Speaker 35: about 81 municipalities would now be

01:12:42 Speaker 35: served by that regional conservation authority.

01:12:44 Speaker 35: And for Huron Superior, it would

01:12:46 Speaker 35: combine seven existing CAs and would

01:12:47 Speaker 35: serve approximately 80 municipalities. So these

01:12:50 Speaker 35: are significantly larger than they they

01:12:52 Speaker 35: were before. For all conservation authorities,

01:12:55 Speaker 35: this is a change in their

01:12:57 Speaker 35: watershed boundary. Despite these still being

01:12:59 Speaker 35: watershed-based areas, these are a change

01:13:00 Speaker 35: for all the conservation authorities, with

01:13:02 Speaker 35: the exception of one. so

01:13:04 Speaker 35: Toronto Region Conservation Authority boundary stays

01:13:06 Speaker 35: exactly the same, but it does

01:13:07 Speaker 35: see a name change to the

01:13:09 Speaker 35: Central Lake Ontario Regional Conservation Authority.

01:13:10 Speaker 35: Just for some context, and there's

01:13:12 Speaker 35: a number of different things, and

01:13:13 Speaker 35: I thank Mr. Lanthier for his

01:13:17 Speaker 35: his comments on this one. And

01:13:18 Speaker 35: I had to bring in something

01:13:20 Speaker 35: which reflects my accent, of course.

01:13:21 Speaker 35: And so, just just for some

01:13:23 Speaker 35: context on how large these areas

01:13:27 Speaker 35: are, you could. drive from the

01:13:28 Speaker 35: southernmost tip, Lands End, for anyone

01:13:30 Speaker 35: that has been there in Cornwall

01:13:31 Speaker 35: in the UK, right the way

01:13:34 Speaker 35: through the whole of the UK,

01:13:37 Speaker 35: crossing through England and Scotland to

01:13:39 Speaker 35: the northernmost tip, crossing two countries

01:13:41 Speaker 35: and numerous different jurisdictions. And it's

01:13:42 Speaker 35: around about the same distance

01:13:45 Speaker 35: as it is from the southern

01:13:48 Speaker 35: tip of the Conservation of the

01:13:52 Speaker 35: Huron Superior Conservation Authority to its

01:13:55 Speaker 35: northernmost tip. And again, the most

01:13:56 Speaker 35: direct route takes you through two

01:13:59 Speaker 35: countries. It's actually quicker to drive

01:14:02 Speaker 35: through the US than it. would

01:14:04 Speaker 35: be to stay in Canada, driving

01:14:07 Speaker 35: from the north to the southern

01:14:10 Speaker 35: end of our regional conservation area.

01:14:14 Speaker 35: As as Mr. Lantier has said,

01:14:17 Speaker 35: this is larger. The area that

01:14:19 Speaker 35: it would be encompassing would be

01:14:21 Speaker 35: larger than the country of Belize.

01:14:23 Speaker 35: So these are very, very, very

01:14:24 Speaker 35: significant. Perhaps more so than just

01:14:28 Speaker 35: the physical size of them is

01:14:31 Speaker 35: the differences that are within them.

01:14:32 Speaker 35: So the Huron Superior Conservation Authority

01:14:34 Speaker 35: touches on Richmond Hill and its

01:14:37 Speaker 35: further south, and so Richmond Hill

01:14:39 Speaker 35: and the cities in King City,

01:14:40 Speaker 35: as you track up towards Barry,

01:14:42 Speaker 35: there is an urban population within

01:14:45 Speaker 35: the Huron Superior Conservation Regional Conservation

01:14:47 Speaker 35: Area of over 550,000 people. And

01:14:49 Speaker 35: so, we would shift from having

01:14:51 Speaker 35: conservation authorities that respond to the

01:14:52 Speaker 35: needs of a rural population, an

01:14:53 Speaker 35: agricultural population, to a conservation authority

01:14:55 Speaker 35: which speaks to a dominant population

01:14:58 Speaker 35: which is urban and a very

01:14:59 Speaker 35: significantly growing GTA. type environment. Again,

01:15:01 Speaker 35: something to be borne in in

01:15:02 Speaker 35: mind. When we distil the concerns

01:15:04 Speaker 35: down of the proposals, both looking

01:15:07 Speaker 35: at the responses that we've seen

01:15:10 Speaker 35: coming from conservation authorities and their

01:15:13 Speaker 35: boards, and when we we look

01:15:15 Speaker 35: at some of the concerns that

01:15:17 Speaker 35: have been shared by by municipalities,

01:15:19 Speaker 35: they sort of fall into these

01:15:21 Speaker 35: five broad buckets. So the first

01:15:23 Speaker 35: one is there is significant erosion

01:15:25 Speaker 35: of local elected government. Erosion of

01:15:26 Speaker 35: local elected governance because there's

01:15:28 Speaker 35: no clear direction as to how

01:15:30 Speaker 35: local members would be represented on

01:15:32 Speaker 35: what could be insanely large boards.

01:15:34 Speaker 35: There's a negative impact to potential

01:15:37 Speaker 35: programs and services such as education,

01:15:40 Speaker 35: stewardship, and recreation, which are largely

01:15:42 Speaker 35: silent within the proposals that are

01:15:44 Speaker 35: in front of us. And these

01:15:46 Speaker 35: tend to be the services that

01:15:50 Speaker 35: communities rely on and respond to

01:15:52 Speaker 35: most favourably. There's an erosion of

01:15:53 Speaker 35: the rural and agricultural voices in

01:15:56 Speaker 35: favour of an urban and suburban

01:15:59 Speaker 35: one. We would be a relatively

01:16:00 Speaker 35: small player within. a very large

01:16:02 Speaker 35: urban environment under new regional conservation

01:16:04 Speaker 35: authority models. There's a potential for

01:16:06 Speaker 35: increased costs because we don't have

01:16:09 Speaker 35: those regional structures just yet, and

01:16:10 Speaker 35: we don't have the provincial agency

01:16:12 Speaker 35: just yet. And so the the

01:16:14 Speaker 35: costs of those would have to

01:16:16 Speaker 35: find a home somewhere. And there's

01:16:18 Speaker 35: no change or improvement to the

01:16:20 Speaker 35: services that are being provided by

01:16:22 Speaker 35: conservation authorities. They're operating under the

01:16:24 Speaker 35: same regulations and the same

01:16:26 Speaker 35: number of staff. As Mr. Lanthier

01:16:29 Speaker 35: said. if you like conservation authorities

01:16:32 Speaker 35: today, your services tomorrow will will

01:16:35 Speaker 35: be worse. If you don't

01:16:37 Speaker 35: like conservation authorities today, the services

01:16:40 Speaker 35: that provided will be the same

01:16:41 Speaker 35: tomorrow, and you'll just be paying

01:16:42 Speaker 35: more for them. So I'll go

01:16:45 Speaker 35: over these fairly quickly

01:16:48 Speaker 35: and just pull out one or

01:16:50 Speaker 35: two. These are all within the

01:16:52 Speaker 35: report with some some noted differences.

01:16:54 Speaker 35: So there are so just to

01:16:56 Speaker 35: talk about some of the local

01:16:59 Speaker 35: service delivery. very briefly. If we

01:17:01 Speaker 35: think aboutly around local service delivery,

01:17:04 Speaker 35: so the GSEA has a

01:17:08 Speaker 35: foundation. There's an arboretum at English

01:17:09 Speaker 35: Falls. There are a number of

01:17:11 Speaker 35: community activities which are take undertaken

01:17:13 Speaker 35: on a local basis. We Grey

01:17:14 Speaker 35: County rely on services on a

01:17:17 Speaker 35: contract basis in terms of trails

01:17:21 Speaker 35: management, forestry bylaw management, and various

01:17:23 Speaker 35: different other programs. There's no clarity

01:17:25 Speaker 35: where those local programs may sit

01:17:27 Speaker 35: within these regional conservation authorities. Where

01:17:29 Speaker 35: under those ones, under those those

01:17:32 Speaker 35: large areas, where these locally tailored

01:17:34 Speaker 35: services sit. There's also a very

01:17:36 Speaker 35: significant concern around municipal representation. These

01:17:39 Speaker 35: are huge bodies, and it's very

01:17:41 Speaker 35: difficult to see that we'd be

01:17:43 Speaker 35: able to achieve the same municipal

01:17:44 Speaker 35: local voice on them. And emergency

01:17:45 Speaker 35: management, conservation authorities have become key

01:17:47 Speaker 35: partners in terms of emergency management,

01:17:49 Speaker 35: with unique understandings of how watersheds

01:17:53 Speaker 35: respond to things such as freeze

01:17:54 Speaker 35: thaw events, permafrost ice events. Crasal

01:17:55 Speaker 35: ice events and to severe weather

01:17:57 Speaker 35: events such as such as flooding.

01:17:58 Speaker 35: We noted there's a rural-urban differential

01:18:00 Speaker 35: there. The conservation authorities undertake huge

01:18:01 Speaker 35: amounts of asset management. Indeed, there

01:18:03 Speaker 35: was a good news article this

01:18:04 Speaker 35: morning on CBC expressing some concerns

01:18:07 Speaker 35: about Thunder Bay, where they have

01:18:09 Speaker 35: some some urbanised flood control structures,

01:18:12 Speaker 35: which the municipalities have been putting

01:18:14 Speaker 35: money aside for for replacement, renewal,

01:18:15 Speaker 35: and repair. What happens to those

01:18:17 Speaker 35: reserves built up for? asset management

01:18:20 Speaker 35: in these broad models, the

01:18:22 Speaker 35: local agreements that we've mentioned could

01:18:24 Speaker 35: be impacted by this, and local

01:18:26 Speaker 35: staffing. So local staffing is important.

01:18:28 Speaker 35: Our conservation authorities employ people in

01:18:30 Speaker 35: our local communities who pay tax,

01:18:32 Speaker 35: who buy housing, and participate in

01:18:33 Speaker 35: local communities. If there's any change

01:18:35 Speaker 35: in that, particularly if they're getting

01:18:38 Speaker 35: pulled into centres of population, do

01:18:40 Speaker 35: we see an erosion of employment

01:18:41 Speaker 35: within our within our communities? I'm

01:18:44 Speaker 35: going to spend a little bit

01:18:46 Speaker 35: more time, perhaps, on some of

01:18:48 Speaker 35: the cost. Time, perhaps, on some

01:18:50 Speaker 35: of the costs. These are largely

01:18:52 Speaker 35: unknown at this point in time.

01:18:54 Speaker 35: But in the in the unknownness

01:18:55 Speaker 35: of them, what we can tell

01:18:56 Speaker 35: is there is an increase in

01:18:58 Speaker 35: costs. So if you read just

01:18:59 Speaker 35: those, I mentioned TRCA boundaries don't

01:19:01 Speaker 35: change. One of their biggest concerns

01:19:04 Speaker 35: is cost. Transitional cost of changing

01:19:06 Speaker 35: their brand is significant. And if

01:19:07 Speaker 35: it's big enough for Toronto to

01:19:09 Speaker 35: worry about, and there's no boundary

01:19:11 Speaker 35: change, we're talking about changing 36

01:19:13 Speaker 35: different conservation authorities' websites and permitting

01:19:15 Speaker 35: platforms onto new platforms. We're talking.

01:19:19 Speaker 35: about letterhead changes, branding changes, and

01:19:21 Speaker 35: all of those various different things.

01:19:22 Speaker 35: The sides of vehicles need to

01:19:24 Speaker 35: be changed. These are transitional costs,

01:19:26 Speaker 35: and they don't change the impact,

01:19:29 Speaker 35: but there is a high cost

01:19:31 Speaker 35: associated with those transitional costs. Our

01:19:33 Speaker 35: municipal funding models are unique, and

01:19:35 Speaker 35: so under the recent changes to

01:19:36 Speaker 35: the Conservation Authorities Act, the province

01:19:37 Speaker 35: bears a small part of their

01:19:38 Speaker 35: costs, and the municipal levy is

01:19:40 Speaker 35: apportioned over three different sections: one

01:19:43 Speaker 35: for mandatory services, and the other

01:19:45 Speaker 35: two are. Services and the other

01:19:46 Speaker 35: two allow for municipalities to shape

01:19:48 Speaker 35: a degree the services that they

01:19:50 Speaker 35: get from each one of their

01:19:52 Speaker 35: conservation authorities. So there is a

01:19:54 Speaker 35: uniqueness in the way in which

01:19:56 Speaker 35: they're funded. How will that funding

01:20:00 Speaker 35: translate into the new time, into

01:20:02 Speaker 35: the new term? The provincial agency

01:20:03 Speaker 35: will have costs and has the

01:20:05 Speaker 35: power to apportion those costs out,

01:20:08 Speaker 35: which essentially mean those costs will

01:20:10 Speaker 35: be apportioned to municipalities. This

01:20:12 Speaker 35: is a cost download for

01:20:15 Speaker 35: a service which we have little

01:20:18 Speaker 35: little oversight of. The equalisation of

01:20:20 Speaker 35: wages resources. Polarization of wages, resources,

01:20:22 Speaker 35: and services is another piece which

01:20:23 Speaker 35: is important to note. As I

01:20:26 Speaker 35: say, the southern extent of the

01:20:28 Speaker 35: Huron Superior Conservation Authority is dealing

01:20:30 Speaker 35: with the very north end and

01:20:32 Speaker 35: the GTA. It's arguable that salaries

01:20:34 Speaker 35: and wages of staff in that

01:20:35 Speaker 35: south end to the north end

01:20:37 Speaker 35: are going to be different, determined

01:20:40 Speaker 35: by local needs and so on

01:20:42 Speaker 35: and so forth. However, under a

01:20:44 Speaker 35: regional conservation authority model, a GIS

01:20:45 Speaker 35: tech in the north would expect

01:20:48 Speaker 35: to earn the same as a

01:20:51 Speaker 35: GIS tech in the south, as

01:20:53 Speaker 35: has played out many. times through

01:20:55 Speaker 35: past amalgamations, there is never a

01:20:58 Speaker 35: leveling down through amalgamation. You only

01:21:01 Speaker 35: ever level up, which will probably

01:21:03 Speaker 35: drive increased costs. There's very little

01:21:04 Speaker 35: noted about source water protection, which

01:21:06 Speaker 35: is of course of critical importance

01:21:08 Speaker 35: to residents in in Bruce

01:21:12 Speaker 35: in Grey County. Sorry, there's little

01:21:15 Speaker 35: to be said about the charitable

01:21:19 Speaker 35: foundations and volunteers. Some conservation authorities

01:21:22 Speaker 35: have very significant charitable works they've

01:21:23 Speaker 35: undertaken and large reserves associated to

01:21:29 Speaker 35: that. and lands management is one

01:21:30 Speaker 35: of the things which many residents

01:21:31 Speaker 35: of Grey County will rely on

01:21:32 Speaker 35: on a regular basis. Is accessing

01:21:33 Speaker 35: the lands managed by our conservation

01:21:35 Speaker 35: authorities in our area. Some of

01:21:37 Speaker 35: those lands are deliberately set aside

01:21:38 Speaker 35: for recreation, and English Falls would

01:21:41 Speaker 35: be a good example of that.

01:21:44 Speaker 35: But many of those lands are

01:21:47 Speaker 35: passively available for recreation. They require

01:21:49 Speaker 35: management, they require local awareness, and

01:21:52 Speaker 35: they require local input. How will

01:21:53 Speaker 35: those lands continue to be managed

01:21:54 Speaker 35: on a go forward basis? On

01:21:56 Speaker 35: a go-forward basis. So the bill

01:21:59 Speaker 35: was announced on the seventh of

01:22:01 Speaker 35: November. Bill sixty-eight is an omnibus

01:22:04 Speaker 35: bill. It was tabled for first

01:22:06 Speaker 35: reading on sixth of November, and

01:22:08 Speaker 35: and received royal assent twenty-one days

01:22:10 Speaker 35: later, on the twenty-seventh. And this

01:22:12 Speaker 35: was one of the pieces within

01:22:16 Speaker 35: it. And so, in essence, the

01:22:19 Speaker 35: legislation has been passed that

01:22:21 Speaker 35: creates the new provincial conservation authority.

01:22:23 Speaker 35: So it's already legislatively able

01:22:27 Speaker 35: to be formed. and so we're

01:22:29 Speaker 35: recommending that council passes a motion

01:22:30 Speaker 35: to request that the costs of

01:22:32 Speaker 35: that new agency are not downloaded.

01:22:34 Speaker 35: In the in the in the

01:22:37 Speaker 35: sense of looking at this from

01:22:39 Speaker 35: what the province is trying to

01:22:42 Speaker 35: achieve, you never want to go

01:22:45 Speaker 35: head to head with the province,

01:22:46 Speaker 35: and so we we have sat

01:22:48 Speaker 35: round and and had ideas about

01:22:50 Speaker 35: other ways in which the province

01:22:53 Speaker 35: may achieve the same outcomes without

01:22:55 Speaker 35: necessarily incurring the costs and and

01:22:57 Speaker 35: the loss of local local control.

01:23:00 Speaker 35: So, modernisation, efficiency, and consistency are

01:23:01 Speaker 35: good things. Reliable service delivery is

01:23:02 Speaker 35: a shared goal, and I think

01:23:04 Speaker 35: I can speak for the conservation

01:23:05 Speaker 35: authorities we work with. We're all

01:23:06 Speaker 35: united in that goal. There are

01:23:08 Speaker 35: existing tools already in place that

01:23:09 Speaker 35: can can create consistency across the

01:23:11 Speaker 35: province. Can create the consistency of

01:23:12 Speaker 35: tools that they use. Can create

01:23:14 Speaker 35: consistency of the key performance indicators

01:23:16 Speaker 35: they work to. without the high

01:23:17 Speaker 35: costs and overall disruptive system overhaul.

01:23:19 Speaker 35: These could include, as part of

01:23:21 Speaker 35: that process, some amalgamations. These amalgamations

01:23:23 Speaker 35: may be sensible where they are

01:23:25 Speaker 35: evidence-based, geographically appropriate, and where CAs

01:23:26 Speaker 35: and member municipalities agree that there

01:23:28 Speaker 35: are efficiencies that could be found

01:23:29 Speaker 35: without incurring those high costs and

01:23:31 Speaker 35: without impacting the loss of local

01:23:33 Speaker 35: service delivery. The province has already

01:23:35 Speaker 35: done some work in terms of

01:23:38 Speaker 35: implementing key. standardised fees and and

01:23:40 Speaker 35: looking at key performance indicators, much

01:23:42 Speaker 35: more could be done in terms

01:23:43 Speaker 35: of that regard, and that could

01:23:45 Speaker 35: be achieved through standardised best practices,

01:23:46 Speaker 35: technical guidances, and policy applied across

01:23:48 Speaker 35: the province. And we understand that

01:23:50 Speaker 35: conservation authorities are very open to

01:23:53 Speaker 35: those conversations. To date, there's not

01:23:55 Speaker 35: been any consultation. Now, when I

01:23:56 Speaker 35: say to date, there has been

01:23:59 Speaker 35: some consultation, just nothing that we've

01:24:01 Speaker 35: been part of at this point.

01:24:03 Speaker 35: I'm hoping that there are members

01:24:05 Speaker 35: around the table that have. there

01:24:07 Speaker 35: has been no consultation or engagement

01:24:09 Speaker 35: on this approach made by the

01:24:11 Speaker 35: province, and as I say, Bill

01:24:12 Speaker 35: sixty eight has already received royal

01:24:14 Speaker 35: assent. However, we are aware that

01:24:17 Speaker 35: there are regional meetings occurring, and

01:24:19 Speaker 35: believe there was one on December

01:24:20 Speaker 29: the eighth in Collingwood. Invitations were

01:24:21 Speaker 29: sent for that, and I am

01:24:23 Speaker 29: hoping some some members received them.

01:24:24 Speaker 29: As we are not a direct

01:24:27 Speaker 29: funding partner for a conservation authority,

01:24:27 Speaker 29: the county has not been involved

01:24:29 Speaker 29: in those consultations to date, but

01:24:31 Speaker 29: anticipate our member municipalities have. So

01:24:34 Speaker 29: I'll end with a recap of

01:24:35 Speaker 29: the recommendations. We're basically asking for

01:24:37 Speaker 29: council support to respond to the

01:24:40 Speaker 29: province through its ERO posting, which

01:24:44 Speaker 29: is due in late December. We're

01:24:48 Speaker 29: asking for assurances that there are

01:24:49 Speaker 29: no additional costs that are headed

01:24:53 Speaker 29: the way of our member municipalities

01:24:55 Speaker 29: in respect to the new conservation

01:24:57 Speaker 29: agency, and we're seeking for a

01:24:58 Speaker 29: pause on further changes on the

01:25:00 Speaker 29: basis that we'd like to see

01:25:03 Speaker 29: some evidence, evidence base around the

01:25:07 Speaker 29: effectiveness of these new regional conservation

01:25:09 Speaker 29: authorities. And with that, I'm available

01:25:13 Speaker 29: for questions. I apologise for. Questions.

01:25:14 Speaker 36: I apologize for taking a few

01:25:16 Speaker 36: minutes there. Director Taylor is also

01:25:17 Speaker 36: available, and at your pleasure, Warden.

01:25:18 Speaker 36: I believe our two general managers

01:25:20 Speaker 36: will be happy to take questions

01:25:21 Speaker 36: as well. Thank you. Okay. Thank

01:25:24 Speaker 37: you very much. No apologies necessary.

01:25:26 Speaker 37: We needed that information in front

01:25:27 Speaker 37: of us, so thank you very

01:25:30 Speaker 20: much, Director Taylor. Is anything that

01:25:35 Speaker 20: you wanted to add before I

01:25:39 Speaker 20: open it? Okay. So, with that,

01:25:41 Speaker 20: as we said to you, we

01:25:42 Speaker 20: do have General Manager Eric Downing

01:25:44 Speaker 20: as well as CAO Tim Lanthier

01:25:46 Speaker 20: here, ready to add any additional

01:25:48 Speaker 38: information. So. with that, I will

01:25:52 Speaker 38: put it out to committee. The

01:25:55 Speaker 38: whole members, if they have questions

01:25:58 Speaker 38: or discussion or comments, we'll start

01:26:00 Speaker 38: with Councillor Body. There we go.

01:26:01 Speaker 38: Thank you. I believe Mr. Lante

01:26:04 Speaker 38: was on open line yesterday. If

01:26:06 Speaker 38: he he gave a answered a

01:26:08 Speaker 38: question about how much money

01:26:11 Speaker 38: is coming from the province and

01:26:12 Speaker 38: where the money comes from,

01:26:15 Speaker 38: and I think that's kind of

01:26:17 Speaker 38: important for us to to hear.

01:26:20 Speaker 38: I guess the province isn't talking

01:26:23 Speaker 38: about cutting costs, but like it's

01:26:24 Speaker 38: it's peanuts that they're putting in.

01:26:26 Speaker 38: If if Tim could answer that,

01:26:28 Speaker 38: it was just briefly what the

01:26:29 Speaker 38: Ontario government used to put in,

01:26:31 Speaker 38: what they put in now, and

01:26:33 Speaker 38: where the money is coming from.

01:26:35 Speaker 38: I I think it's good for

01:26:37 Speaker 38: all of us to hear it.

01:26:39 Speaker 38: Okay, so I'll encourage CEO Lantzy

01:26:39 Speaker 38: if you'd like to come to

01:26:42 Speaker 38: the lectern, and the deputy CEO

01:26:44 Speaker 38: will assist you with the mic.

01:26:45 Speaker 38: thank you, Madam Warden and Council.

01:26:47 Speaker 38: I'll speak with regards to Grey-Sable

01:26:48 Speaker 38: Conservation Authority budget, and it won't

01:26:50 Speaker 38: be exactly the same across the

01:26:53 Speaker 38: province, but the model generally remains

01:26:59 Speaker 38: the same. So, when the conservation

01:27:01 Speaker 38: authorities first started, it started as,

01:27:05 Speaker 38: as Deputy CAO mentioned, as a

01:27:07 Speaker 38: partnership between the province and the

01:27:09 Speaker 38: and the municipalities, rather. But at

01:27:10 Speaker 38: the behest of the municipalities, and

01:27:13 Speaker 39: at that time, it's my understanding

01:27:15 Speaker 39: that budget was split fifty-fifty between

01:27:20 Speaker 39: the province and the municipalities. Today,

01:27:22 Speaker 39: moving into twenty twenty-six for Grey-Sable

01:27:27 Speaker 39: Conservation Authority's budget, we're funding fifty

01:27:29 Speaker 39: percent of that budget ourselves through

01:27:31 Speaker 39: self-generated revenues that may, in fact,

01:27:33 Speaker 39: be at risk through this amalgamation.

01:27:36 Speaker 39: Our municipal partners are funding about

01:27:41 Speaker 39: forty-three percent of that budget, and

01:27:44 Speaker 39: the province is coming to the

01:27:48 Speaker 39: table with seven percent. Now, in

01:27:49 Speaker 39: Grey-Sable's case, it's important. Now, in

01:27:52 Speaker 39: Grey Sable's case, it's important to

01:27:54 Speaker 39: recognize that the lion's share of

01:27:57 Speaker 39: that seven percent is drinking water

01:28:00 Speaker 39: source protection work that we do

01:28:03 Speaker 39: for Grey Sable, for Saugeen, and

01:28:04 Speaker 39: for Northern Bruce Peninsula. So, when

01:28:10 Speaker 39: we look at the money that

01:28:12 Speaker 39: the province is bringing forward to

01:28:17 Speaker 39: Grey Sable Conservation Authority for

01:28:20 Speaker 39: the natural hazards work, that seems

01:28:23 Speaker 39: to be one of the drivers

01:28:26 Speaker 39: here. It's about one percent of

01:28:30 Speaker 39: our budget. It's thirty-seven thousand dollars

01:28:33 Speaker 39: of a four point two five

01:28:37 Speaker 39: million dollar budget. Hopefully, that helps

01:28:39 Speaker 39: answer the question. Thank you very

01:28:44 Speaker 39: much. We'll go to Councillor Dobrine.

01:28:47 Speaker 39: Thank you, and thank you to

01:28:51 Speaker 39: our representatives from the Conservation Authorities

01:28:53 Speaker 39: for being here. And I can

01:28:58 Speaker 39: add that SPCA is not much

01:29:01 Speaker 39: different in those numbers. What I

01:29:03 Speaker 39: did want to add to the

01:29:05 Speaker 39: Deputy CAO is that I attended

01:29:08 Speaker 39: that Callingwood session on Monday, and

01:29:12 Speaker 39: from still unknown, of course, we

01:29:14 Speaker 39: we we don't know what we

01:29:17 Speaker 39: don't know. But for the first

01:29:19 Speaker 39: three years, the province will totally

01:29:24 Speaker 39: fund this this new agency of

01:29:27 Speaker 39: oversight. After that, we don't know.

01:29:30 Speaker 39: The transition of letterhead and that

01:29:33 Speaker 39: branding piece was spoken about

01:29:36 Speaker 39: at the meeting, and it would

01:29:38 Speaker 39: be transition. So as you run

01:29:40 Speaker 39: out of business cards and stationery.

01:29:43 Speaker 39: and those things, then you would

01:29:45 Speaker 39: reorder under the new brand. But

01:29:47 Speaker 39: again, what that brand looks like

01:29:51 Speaker 39: would be a decision of the

01:29:56 Speaker 39: new regional conservation authority. The assets

01:29:58 Speaker 39: piece of the puzzle, the lands

01:30:02 Speaker 39: that have been purchased through means

01:30:03 Speaker 39: of each individual conservation authority, is

01:30:05 Speaker 39: supposed to remain intact. the question

01:30:07 Speaker 39: of lands that have been donated

01:30:11 Speaker 39: by landowners, so that the conservation

01:30:13 Speaker 10: authority could protect them locally in

01:30:15 Speaker 10: perpetuity, would fall within those assets

01:30:17 Speaker 10: and be under the management of

01:30:21 Speaker 10: the new seven regional conservation authorities.

01:30:24 Speaker 10: So, there's the potential for losing

01:30:26 Speaker 10: some of that land management and.

01:30:28 Speaker 10: agreement that we have with those

01:30:30 Speaker 10: those dones. So there's there. I

01:30:33 Speaker 10: really do appreciate the deputy CAO's

01:30:35 Speaker 10: presentation. It really summarized it very

01:30:37 Speaker 10: clearly. There are still too many

01:30:41 Speaker 10: unknowns. I support the comments that

01:30:42 Speaker 10: are going forward. They did attempt

01:30:47 Speaker 10: to share or dispel some of

01:30:50 Speaker 10: the concerns with regard to what

01:30:51 Speaker 10: this all looks like. But in

01:30:54 Speaker 20: my opinion, introducing another level of

01:30:56 Speaker 20: oversight increases costs and won't speed

01:30:57 Speaker 20: up the process. I fully support

01:30:59 Speaker 20: the province providing the tools that

01:31:02 Speaker 20: are available to some larger conservation

01:31:05 Speaker 20: authorities, so that we're all playing

01:31:05 Speaker 20: and have those same tools to

01:31:08 Speaker 20: work with. And there are efficiencies

01:31:12 Speaker 20: that could be found through that.

01:31:14 Speaker 20: So thank you very much for.

01:31:16 Speaker 20: the presentation, the report. There's still

01:31:17 Speaker 20: more information to be had. Okay,

01:31:22 Speaker 20: thank you very much, and we'll

01:31:26 Speaker 20: go to Councillor McKay. Yes, thank

01:31:30 Speaker 20: you very much. That was a

01:31:32 Speaker 20: lot of information through you, Warden.

01:31:34 Speaker 40: I sat on conservation in the

01:31:36 Speaker 40: good days. I'm talking, sat on

01:31:55 Speaker 40: there for 25 years with good

01:31:58 Speaker 40: funding from the province, and we

01:32:01 Speaker 40: seemed to get along. We seem

01:32:02 Speaker 40: to get along quite good. There's

01:32:03 Speaker 40: a lot of donations of volunteer

01:32:07 Speaker 35: and giving land, and I have

01:32:08 Speaker 35: a real concern that we're going

01:32:12 Speaker 35: to lose all that because I

01:32:13 Speaker 35: still am a believer that they

01:32:15 Speaker 35: don't really think of us north

01:32:17 Speaker 35: of Highway Seven. So the more

01:32:19 Speaker 35: we can do to support our

01:32:21 Speaker 35: local conservation, we need to do

01:32:22 Speaker 35: it or we're going to be

01:32:25 Speaker 35: in trouble. Thank you. Thank you.

01:32:27 Speaker 35: And we'll go to Councillor Eccles.

01:32:31 Speaker 35: But then I'll just ask, perhaps,

01:32:33 Speaker 35: if either Eric or Tim might

01:32:36 Speaker 41: want to add anything to that

01:32:39 Speaker 41: question that has been resonating quite

01:32:41 Speaker 41: a bit about local donations of

01:32:43 Speaker 41: land. So, when people have, as

01:32:45 Speaker 41: Councillor McKay has outlined, put it

01:32:46 Speaker 41: into the hands of a conservation

01:32:49 Speaker 41: authority, believing that it would be

01:32:50 Speaker 41: forever locally managed and protected, what

01:32:52 Speaker 41: would happen? What what would happen

01:32:56 Speaker 41: if they have any further information

01:32:59 Speaker 41: on on that process? We'll go

01:33:03 Speaker 41: to Councillor Eccles in the meantime.

01:33:05 Speaker 41: I've said on the conservation, so

01:33:06 Speaker 41: game conservation, numerous times back and

01:33:10 Speaker 41: forth. I guess out of the

01:33:13 Speaker 41: whole bill and and this restructuring

01:33:16 Speaker 41: and whatnot, what is the province

01:33:17 Speaker 41: trying to fix? What's the problem?

01:33:19 Speaker 41: Actually, I'm not sure I can

01:33:21 Speaker 41: take a stab. So, I think

01:33:23 Speaker 41: ultimately, if we look at the

01:33:25 Speaker 41: broad suite of what the province

01:33:27 Speaker 41: is committed to in terms of

01:33:32 Speaker 41: its its its policy agenda over

01:33:33 Speaker 41: both its previous term and its

01:33:36 Speaker 41: current term. There is there is

01:33:41 Speaker 41: a housing shortage in the province

01:33:44 Speaker 41: of Ontario. They are looking to

01:33:46 Speaker 41: put in place ways of getting

01:33:50 Speaker 42: more houses built. Take to do

01:33:53 Speaker 42: so, and so if we're following

01:33:56 Speaker 42: that logic through, and I'm not

01:33:58 Speaker 42: going to make any comment on

01:34:07 Speaker 43: on on on that that direction.

01:34:13 Speaker 43: But if you follow that logic

01:34:17 Speaker 43: through, the intent behind this would

01:34:19 Speaker 43: be to eliminate red tape, reduce

01:34:20 Speaker 43: red tape, to allow for more

01:34:23 Speaker 43: houses to be built quicker. if

01:34:27 Speaker 43: we follow the policy intent of

01:34:28 Speaker 43: the province, that is what this

01:34:32 Speaker 43: is driving at. And then, if

01:34:34 Speaker 43: you take that next step, conservation

01:34:39 Speaker 43: authority red tape is a barrier

01:34:40 Speaker 43: to the development of one point

01:34:44 Speaker 43: five million dollar, one point five

01:34:48 Speaker 43: million new homes. And therefore, by

01:34:51 Speaker 43: taking a stronger provincial role over

01:34:53 Speaker 43: larger regional bodies, the intent would

01:34:55 Speaker 43: be to lower overall costs and

01:34:57 Speaker 43: cut red tape to speed up

01:34:59 Speaker 43: permanent. To speed up permitting times,

01:35:00 Speaker 43: somewhat with my tongue inside my

01:35:05 Speaker 43: cheek, for the benefit of Sorgen

01:35:08 Speaker 43: Valley residents, that would be trying

01:35:11 Speaker 43: to reduce a permit time of

01:35:12 Speaker 43: four days to something quicker than

01:35:14 Speaker 43: four days. And so, I will

01:35:15 Speaker 43: leave it to that. That is

01:35:18 Speaker 43: what I understand the intent behind

01:35:24 Speaker 43: this bill and act is for.

01:35:26 Speaker 43: Okay, thank you for that attempt

01:35:31 Speaker 43: to answer. Follow up, Councillor Eccles.

01:35:32 Speaker 43: I too was in Collingwood on

01:35:37 Speaker 43: Monday morning, and you know that's

01:35:40 Speaker 43: a better answer than what I

01:35:44 Speaker 20: got there. But I'm still struggling

01:35:45 Speaker 20: to figure out what is in

01:35:48 Speaker 20: here. Is it just to

01:35:52 Speaker 44: get conservation back to what the

01:35:53 Speaker 44: legislation said back in 1954? Mr.

01:35:57 Speaker 44: Lanthier said that forty percent, forty,

01:36:00 Speaker 44: forty-three percent was self-generated funding. I

01:36:02 Speaker 44: believe as well was it fifty

01:36:04 Speaker 44: percent is self-generated somewhere around there,

01:36:06 Speaker 44: and a number of the conservation

01:36:09 Speaker 44: authorities that were in Collingwood, there

01:36:13 Speaker 44: was a representative from Thunder Bay

01:36:14 Speaker 44: there. Matter of fact, as well

01:36:17 Speaker 44: too. But I guess. the point

01:36:21 Speaker 44: being is that in '54 was

01:36:24 Speaker 44: it that this was a business

01:36:27 Speaker 44: case to be driven? Is that

01:36:30 Speaker 44: what we're looking at here? That

01:36:36 Speaker 44: conservation authorities have gone this way.

01:36:37 Speaker 44: I don't know. Like, and I'm

01:36:40 Speaker 44: not certain that I can't support

01:36:42 Speaker 44: the way that this is being

01:36:45 Speaker 44: put out. If it is to

01:36:47 Speaker 20: fix a problem, that we have

01:36:48 Speaker 20: no idea what it is to

01:36:53 Speaker 20: fix. So, into the dark, and

01:36:59 Speaker 20: hopefully, you know, maybe at December

01:37:02 Speaker 20: twenty fifth, at Christmas in Owen

01:37:09 Speaker 20: Sound, they'll give us an answer.

01:37:11 Speaker 20: You know, the present will be

01:37:13 Speaker 20: presented to us. Hopefully, Mister Body.

01:37:16 Speaker 20: You know, I don't know. Thank

01:37:20 Speaker 20: you. Thank you. Yes, and it

01:37:21 Speaker 20: was fifty percent self-funded, such as

01:37:23 Speaker 45: educational programming. Okay, so we've got

01:37:25 Speaker 45: a question here from Councillor Kentner.

01:37:27 Speaker 45: Go ahead. Thank you, and through

01:37:29 Speaker 45: Warden Matrasov's, I think Councillor Eccles

01:37:33 Speaker 45: really nailed this. Maybe two weeks

01:37:35 Speaker 45: ago when we were talking about

01:37:37 Speaker 45: other aspects of provincial consolidation and

01:37:38 Speaker 45: centralisation, I think it is, and

01:37:41 Speaker 45: I think there's a great danger

01:37:44 Speaker 45: of actual privatisation. Actual privatization of

01:37:47 Speaker 45: the of the assets of some

01:37:49 Speaker 45: of the assets that have come

01:37:52 Speaker 45: been developed through the the years

01:37:54 Speaker 45: by the conservation authorities. I think

01:37:56 Speaker 45: it's a worst case scenario, and

01:37:58 Speaker 45: that I applaud all the efforts

01:38:01 Speaker 45: that are being made. The municipality

01:38:03 Speaker 45: of Miford approved a very lengthy

01:38:06 Speaker 45: motion yesterday, which will be circulated

01:38:09 Speaker 45: to everyone because we need a

01:38:11 Speaker 45: lot of. pushback here if we're

01:38:13 Speaker 45: going to prevent quite a disastrous

01:38:15 Speaker 45: situation. Thank you. Okay, so the

01:38:17 Speaker 45: question of assets is a good

01:38:18 Speaker 45: segue. Cao Lanthier or General Manager

01:38:21 Speaker 45: Downing, did you have any additional

01:38:24 Speaker 45: information about the legacy of gifts

01:38:27 Speaker 45: that have land gifts that have

01:38:28 Speaker 45: been given to the conservation parties,

01:38:30 Speaker 45: and anything further, or are you?

01:38:32 Speaker 45: unknown of any further information? Okay,

01:38:35 Speaker 45: here here comes an attempt. Thank

01:38:37 Speaker 45: you. Thank you, Madam Warden. I'd

01:38:41 Speaker 45: like to preface this with this

01:38:44 Speaker 45: is speculation because we have not

01:38:47 Speaker 45: been provided with enough information to

01:38:48 Speaker 45: provide solid answers. What I'm going

01:38:51 Speaker 45: to draw on is my own

01:38:54 Speaker 45: experience in my role, both in

01:38:57 Speaker 45: managing conservation authority lands and and

01:38:59 Speaker 45: then my role as the

01:39:01 Speaker 45: CAO of the conservation authority, is

01:39:03 Speaker 29: that inevitably periodically we will have

01:39:05 Speaker 29: a member at our board table

01:39:08 Speaker 29: that asks, you know, funding's tight.

01:39:11 Speaker 29: Is there any land that we

01:39:14 Speaker 29: can divest of to help with

01:39:16 Speaker 29: operating funding? My stance has always

01:39:18 Speaker 29: been that one-off sales of

01:39:20 Speaker 29: of property and assets are not

01:39:22 Speaker 29: good solutions to operating funding shortfalls

01:39:24 Speaker 29: because they are. that they're one

01:39:25 Speaker 29: off. My concern lies in that

01:39:27 Speaker 29: when we scale up to a

01:39:29 Speaker 29: regional board, where our eighty local

01:39:32 Speaker 29: member municipalities—and I say local across

01:39:33 Speaker 29: the region—are not familiar with the

01:39:36 Speaker 29: different corners of our actual local

01:39:38 Speaker 29: areas, what's local to us today,

01:39:40 Speaker 29: is that there's going to be

01:39:43 Speaker 29: a disconnect between what we see

01:39:46 Speaker 29: on paper or a map and

01:39:48 Speaker 29: what we value in our local.

01:39:50 Speaker 29: And I think that disconnect raises

01:39:51 Speaker 29: risk. in terms of the the

01:39:53 Speaker 29: potential for those lands to be

01:39:55 Speaker 29: divested of when the goal of

01:39:57 Speaker 29: conservation authorities right now in land

01:39:58 Speaker 29: management is to preserve those in

01:40:01 Speaker 29: perpetuity for our communities. Again, that

01:40:06 Speaker 29: is speculation based on my experience

01:40:07 Speaker 29: in this role. Thank you. Thank

01:40:09 Speaker 29: you. And while you're there, wait,

01:40:11 Speaker 29: wait, wait, don't go too far.

01:40:13 Speaker 29: While you're there, so while that

01:40:15 Speaker 29: meeting was on, I was actually

01:40:17 Speaker 45: at. Parliament Hill with Conservation Ontario.

01:40:20 Speaker 45: It was the Great Lakes Day,

01:40:25 Speaker 45: where there were sixteen sixteen organizations

01:40:28 Speaker 45: all advocating for the Great Lakes,

01:40:31 Speaker 45: such as Environmental Stewardship, and Conservation

01:40:33 Speaker 45: Ontario was there, loud and present.

01:40:38 Speaker 45: Angela Coleman was there along with

01:40:41 Speaker 45: Bonnie Fox. So, what are you

01:40:44 Speaker 45: hearing in terms of restructure,

01:40:47 Speaker 45: restructure, new model, etc.? We've we've

01:40:52 Speaker 45: zeroed in on the idea that

01:40:56 Speaker 45: right now we know in our

01:41:00 Speaker 45: local conservation authorities, our municipalities are

01:41:02 Speaker 46: represented through there's one each or

01:41:07 Speaker 46: maybe two depending on population. But

01:41:11 Speaker 46: we know that the voices are

01:41:16 Speaker 46: all there. Then we know that

01:41:20 Speaker 46: the chair of that that concert

01:41:22 Speaker 46: that local conservation authority will then

01:41:25 Speaker 46: take that voice and sit together

01:41:29 Speaker 46: with Conservation Ontario, which provides good

01:41:33 Speaker 46: advocacy and good dialogue with the

01:41:36 Speaker 46: province and in this particular case

01:41:38 Speaker 46: the federal level as well. So

01:41:40 Speaker 46: what is the discussion about what

01:41:42 Speaker 46: would happen with that that structure?

01:41:43 Speaker 46: Because there's already a deficit. If

01:41:48 Speaker 46: a new board of a much

01:41:54 Speaker 46: larger one means not every municipality

01:41:56 Speaker 46: will be seated there. What about

01:41:59 Speaker 46: that structure where then that voice

01:42:01 Speaker 46: gets carried by the chair and

01:42:05 Speaker 46: the CAOs sitting around at Conservation

01:42:13 Speaker 46: Ontario together? So, Madam Warden, I

01:42:15 Speaker 46: just want to make sure that

01:42:17 Speaker 46: I understand the question. Are we

01:42:18 Speaker 46: asking about what happens to the

01:42:19 Speaker 46: entity that is Conservation Ontario, or

01:42:21 Speaker 45: we are? Okay. I don't have

01:42:24 Speaker 45: an answer for that. I am

01:42:25 Speaker 45: concerned that if we are rolled

01:42:26 Speaker 45: up into seven regions, that I'm

01:42:27 Speaker 45: concerned for Conservation Ontario. I'll leave

01:42:29 Speaker 45: it at that. Thank you. Thank

01:42:31 Speaker 45: you. We'll go over to Councillor

01:42:32 Speaker 45: Dobrin. Thank you, Warden, and through

01:42:35 Speaker 45: you, getting back to the funding

01:42:38 Speaker 45: model with their. Where fifty percent

01:42:39 Speaker 45: is self-generated, forty-three percent is municipally

01:42:41 Speaker 45: funded. Where originally was a fifty-fifty

01:42:43 Speaker 45: partnership. Could you elaborate on the

01:42:46 Speaker 45: use of those self-generated funds? I

01:42:49 Speaker 45: know from authority we have campgrounds

01:42:50 Speaker 45: which are totally self-supporting, and help

01:42:52 Speaker 45: alleviate some of the municipal burden.

01:42:54 Speaker 45: the fees from environmental planning and

01:42:56 Speaker 45: regulations, if they were actually even

01:43:00 Speaker 45: close to cost recovery, help reduce

01:43:01 Speaker 45: the burden on the taxpayer, the

01:43:03 Speaker 45: municipal burden, because development should pay

01:43:05 Speaker 45: for development. With the province only

01:43:07 Speaker 45: contributing a small portion, one percent

01:43:09 Speaker 45: in in the case of Sauguen

01:43:11 Speaker 45: Valley Conservation Authority, maybe upwards. of

01:43:13 Speaker 45: three, but also the source water

01:43:18 Speaker 45: protection. I understand they did say

01:43:19 Speaker 45: on Monday that that would be

01:43:20 Speaker 45: protected. The self-generated funds. If the

01:43:21 Speaker 45: province were actually partners in this,

01:43:23 Speaker 45: would we need to utilize those

01:43:26 Speaker 45: self-generated funds? Would we need to

01:43:28 Speaker 45: rely on those self-generated funds to

01:43:29 Speaker 45: support the conservation goal? Cool. Yeah,

01:43:31 Speaker 45: that's an interesting question and an

01:43:33 Speaker 45: interesting way to think about it.

01:43:36 Speaker 45: Just, I just say that in

01:43:39 Speaker 45: the fact that I hadn't thought

01:43:40 Speaker 45: about that because we that money

01:43:42 Speaker 45: just doesn't exist from the province.

01:43:43 Speaker 45: I think what it would allow

01:43:46 Speaker 45: us to do. So, I'm going

01:43:47 Speaker 45: to step back a second before

01:43:49 Speaker 45: I answer that question fully and

01:43:53 Speaker 45: look at how Grace Ovals, because

01:43:54 Speaker 45: again, I can only speak to

01:43:55 Speaker 45: my own organization, but but how

01:43:57 Speaker 45: our funding model and and revenue.

01:44:00 Speaker 45: Model and and revenues and what

01:44:02 Speaker 45: we do with those revenues has

01:44:04 Speaker 45: changed over the last five to

01:44:07 Speaker 45: ten years, and some areas where

01:44:08 Speaker 45: we've seen dramatic increases in our

01:44:10 Speaker 45: localized funding is the the

01:44:13 Speaker 45: primary one that I'll lean on

01:44:15 Speaker 45: is our parking program. So we've

01:44:17 Speaker 45: done very very well with our

01:44:19 Speaker 45: parking program over the last five

01:44:26 Speaker 45: to ten years, such that in

01:44:27 Speaker 45: 2025 we're expecting over four hundred

01:44:32 Speaker 45: thousand dollars in revenues from that.

01:44:34 Speaker 45: What that means in terms of

01:44:36 Speaker 45: our relationship with the municipalities. is

01:44:39 Speaker 45: that our operations department, that looks

01:44:41 Speaker 45: after those lands on the ground,

01:44:43 Speaker 47: hands-on, day to day, the levy

01:44:45 Speaker 47: ask in that department initially dropped

01:44:49 Speaker 47: and has maybe just come back

01:44:53 Speaker 47: to where it was at that

01:44:55 Speaker 47: point. So anyway, I guess what

01:44:57 Speaker 47: I'm saying is the levy has

01:44:59 Speaker 47: remained static in that. But in

01:45:01 Speaker 47: conjunction with that levy staying static,

01:45:03 Speaker 47: we've been able to expand the

01:45:04 Speaker 47: staffing in that program area to

01:45:05 Speaker 22: provide better visitor experience and better

01:45:08 Speaker 22: protect the natural environment. and we've

01:45:09 Speaker 22: been able to to bolster our

01:45:12 Speaker 22: reserves that help us reinvest in

01:45:14 Speaker 22: those lands to pay for those

01:45:16 Speaker 22: assets. So that's something that we've

01:45:20 Speaker 22: been able to do by the

01:45:22 Speaker 22: use of being able to generate

01:45:24 Speaker 22: these funds. I think if the

01:45:26 Speaker 22: province were to come to the

01:45:28 Speaker 22: table and reinvigorate funding support that

01:45:30 Speaker 22: they used to provide, now I

01:45:32 Speaker 22: don't think we can expect fifty

01:45:33 Speaker 22: percent, but even if they increased

01:45:35 Speaker 22: it, I'm not convinced that it

01:45:39 Speaker 22: would that the best use would

01:45:41 Speaker 22: be to reduce those self-generated revenues

01:45:47 Speaker 22: or to reduce municipal levy. But

01:45:49 Speaker 22: I think what it could do

01:45:52 Speaker 22: is better earmark those self-generated revenues,

01:45:55 Speaker 22: better contain annual levy increases, and

01:46:00 Speaker 22: at the end of the day,

01:46:03 Speaker 22: also allow for better service provision

01:46:06 Speaker 22: overall, especially in mandatory programming. Thank

01:46:09 Speaker 22: you. Okay, not seeing any hands

01:46:11 Speaker 22: online. We'll go to Councilor Greg

01:46:14 Speaker 22: next. It will culminate in a

01:46:18 Speaker 22: question at the end here, but

01:46:21 Speaker 22: just a few thoughts. I have

01:46:23 Speaker 22: profound disappointment in the government which

01:46:25 Speaker 22: exists right now, Queens Park, that

01:46:28 Speaker 22: doesn't foster an environment where you

01:46:30 Speaker 22: collect the adequate materials and information

01:46:33 Speaker 22: to first make decisions. I don't,

01:46:35 Speaker 22: I can't be convinced that this

01:46:36 Speaker 22: is a problem contributing to the

01:46:40 Speaker 22: lack of housing being built in

01:46:41 Speaker 22: the province. I know I had

01:46:42 Speaker 22: a 30-second elevator pitch with a

01:46:45 Speaker 22: minister a couple years ago, and

01:46:49 Speaker 22: I said, "If you want to

01:46:51 Speaker 22: do something, we have over 3,000

01:46:53 Speaker 22: units pre-approved on our books in

01:46:55 Speaker 22: Owen Sound. You create an economic

01:46:58 Speaker 22: development strategy, residents to Owen Sound.

01:47:03 Speaker 22: We've got the housing approved. We

01:47:04 Speaker 22: have a multitude of pre-approvals and

01:47:06 Speaker 22: permits that are generated already by

01:47:09 Speaker 22: the conservation authority, and we're circulated

01:47:12 Speaker 22: as board members, and we see

01:47:14 Speaker 22: them. So it's not red tape."

01:47:18 Speaker 22: that's in the way. It's already

01:47:22 Speaker 22: approved, and we're just waiting and

01:47:26 Speaker 22: hoping that the shovels will go

01:47:28 Speaker 22: in the ground. So I can't

01:47:29 Speaker 22: be convinced on on this being

01:47:31 Speaker 22: the rationale for for slowing housing

01:47:34 Speaker 22: down. It's not. I am very

01:47:35 Speaker 22: frustrated that the the bill was

01:47:37 Speaker 22: just passed forward, passed through without

01:47:38 Speaker 22: adequate discussion, without all consideration, without

01:47:42 Speaker 22: listening to people across the province.

01:47:44 Speaker 22: and and you know, responding to

01:47:48 Speaker 22: the concerns that they're they're hearing

01:47:51 Speaker 22: at this time, it's poor governance,

01:47:53 Speaker 22: in my opinion, and I'm certainly

01:47:55 Speaker 22: frustrated with our local representatives at

01:47:57 Speaker 22: this time and not being more

01:48:01 Speaker 22: vocal, and and reflecting, I think,

01:48:04 Speaker 22: the communities within Grey County. We

01:48:08 Speaker 22: had a wonderful MPP many years

01:48:11 Speaker 22: ago, and he was very vocal

01:48:15 Speaker 22: at Grey County. He was very

01:48:20 Speaker 22: vocal at Gray County, and he

01:48:22 Speaker 22: would verbally express down there whether

01:48:25 Speaker 22: people liked it or not, the

01:48:26 Speaker 22: opinions and reflect the sentiment of

01:48:29 Speaker 22: this riding. And I think we

01:48:31 Speaker 22: need to see more of that.

01:48:34 Speaker 22: The question I have is, as

01:48:35 Speaker 22: a councillor who has sat many

01:48:37 Speaker 22: years on the Conservation Authority and

01:48:39 Speaker 22: twice been able to chair Gray

01:48:41 Speaker 22: Sable, one of the best resources

01:48:44 Speaker 22: that I can take forward from

01:48:46 Speaker 22: our work, and we've had a.

01:48:49 Speaker 22: presentation, deputation a couple years ago

01:48:59 Speaker 22: about surcharging or discharging into Georgian

01:49:02 Speaker 22: Bay in the town of Blue

01:49:04 Speaker 22: Mountains and concerns of of the

01:49:08 Speaker 22: resident at that time. One of

01:49:10 Speaker 22: the best resources that we get

01:49:12 Speaker 22: as board members are watershed report

01:49:14 Speaker 22: cards, and the watershed report cards

01:49:17 Speaker 22: give us measurables on forest cover,

01:49:19 Speaker 22: on wetlands, and on. Lands and

01:49:21 Speaker 22: on surface water. You can collect

01:49:23 Speaker 45: too much data in the world.

01:49:25 Speaker 45: At times, data does not add

01:49:27 Speaker 45: value. But in this case, the

01:49:28 Speaker 45: watershed report cards did add value,

01:49:31 Speaker 45: and it added really good value.

01:49:34 Speaker 45: Because as a counselor, then I'm

01:49:36 Speaker 45: able to go back to my

01:49:37 Speaker 45: local municipality, and I can respond

01:49:39 Speaker 45: with policy then that's going to

01:49:41 Speaker 45: encourage stronger grades in forest cover,

01:49:42 Speaker 45: in lands, and in surface water.

01:49:44 Speaker 45: and that's the type of

01:49:47 Speaker 45: I have a concern. We've got

01:49:49 Speaker 45: a Bothwell Creek right outside of

01:49:51 Speaker 45: our door here. Surcharges into Georgian

01:49:52 Speaker 45: Bay. The question to staff and

01:49:55 Speaker 45: and to Tim is, how does

01:49:57 Speaker 45: the changes respond and recognize that

01:49:59 Speaker 45: that's an important measurable? That as

01:50:01 Speaker 45: elected officials we can garner very

01:50:03 Speaker 45: quantity. Very quantifiable, measurable data off

01:50:05 Speaker 45: of, and take that and try

01:50:09 Speaker 45: to prescribe it into policy at

01:50:13 Speaker 45: a local level. Will that be

01:50:14 Speaker 45: maintained, or is that at risk

01:50:15 Speaker 45: of being lost? Because right now,

01:50:17 Speaker 45: the forest doesn't have a voice,

01:50:20 Speaker 45: the wetlands don't have a voice,

01:50:22 Speaker 45: and the surface water doesn't have

01:50:24 Speaker 45: a voice. But it gets one

01:50:25 Speaker 45: through items like the watershed report

01:50:27 Speaker 45: cards and being able to respond

01:50:30 Speaker 45: as counselors at a local level.

01:50:31 Speaker 45: in creating policy that does give

01:50:33 Speaker 45: it a voice. Thank you, Madam

01:50:36 Speaker 45: Borden. Thank you for that, Councilor

01:50:40 Speaker 45: Greg. That was excellent. Very well

01:50:42 Speaker 45: said. Again, it's speculation because we

01:50:44 Speaker 45: we simply don't have the information.

01:50:51 Speaker 45: We don't have feasibility assessments, cost

01:50:53 Speaker 45: benefit analysis, anything to support this

01:50:54 Speaker 45: transition. So any thoughts I have

01:50:57 Speaker 45: about the future are simply that

01:51:01 Speaker 45: they're my opinions based on my

01:51:03 Speaker 45: experience. What I can say with

01:51:04 Speaker 48: certainty is that the watershed report

01:51:05 Speaker 48: cards that we produce are part

01:51:06 Speaker 48: of what is considered a category

01:51:07 Speaker 48: three program. So it's based on

01:51:10 Speaker 48: extensive watershed monitoring that we do,

01:51:14 Speaker 48: and and then we wrap that

01:51:16 Speaker 48: up and report back to the

01:51:18 Speaker 48: community so that the community has

01:51:22 Speaker 48: a sense of what is the

01:51:24 Speaker 48: state of the health of the

01:51:27 Speaker 48: watershed in which we live. That's

01:51:29 Speaker 48: Which we live—that's category three programming.

01:51:31 Speaker 48: The province, through previous changes to

01:51:32 Speaker 48: the Conservation Authorities Act, and through

01:51:34 Speaker 48: what we're hearing as the drivers

01:51:37 Speaker 48: for this consolidation, is very, very

01:51:40 Speaker 48: focused on category one. So where

01:51:44 Speaker 48: my concern lies is not one

01:51:47 Speaker 48: or two years down the road,

01:51:48 Speaker 48: but five to ten years down

01:51:50 Speaker 48: the road, as we continue to

01:51:51 Speaker 48: face financial pressures, and our our

01:51:52 Speaker 48: primary drivers, our goals, our category

01:51:55 Speaker 48: one programs, inevitably you get. to

01:51:57 Speaker 48: a point where you have to

01:52:01 Speaker 48: start to squeeze down, and where

01:52:03 Speaker 48: you squeeze is those category three

01:52:05 Speaker 48: program areas. And when those decisions

01:52:09 Speaker 48: are not being made locally again,

01:52:13 Speaker 48: and those decisions are being made

01:52:14 Speaker 48: at a regional level, what's important

01:52:17 Speaker 48: to our local communities could stand

01:52:20 Speaker 48: to be lost when that's how

01:52:21 Speaker 48: those decisions are being made in

01:52:24 Speaker 48: that fashion. So again, that's my

01:52:25 Speaker 48: opinion, but it's based on my

01:52:26 Speaker 48: experience. Thank you. Thank you, and

01:52:29 Speaker 48: I'll invite. General Manager Downing to

01:52:32 Speaker 48: come to the lectern. Thank you,

01:52:37 Speaker 48: Madam Matrasov, and thank you for

01:52:39 Speaker 48: having me and to members of

01:52:42 Speaker 48: council for hearing from me on

01:52:43 Speaker 48: this. Just to support Tim's comments,

01:52:45 Speaker 48: I think what we're seeing, and

01:52:48 Speaker 48: if we, I was going to

01:52:52 Speaker 48: say let's look at this from

01:52:56 Speaker 48: a ten thousand foot lens, but

01:52:58 Speaker 48: we got to go higher. We

01:53:01 Speaker 48: got to go to full UK

01:53:04 Speaker 48: scale. on this, as we heard

01:53:06 Speaker 48: earlier. What what are what what

01:53:06 Speaker 48: are we seeing here? We're seeing

01:53:09 Speaker 48: a proposal that that in supported

01:53:10 Speaker 48: by our Sagiing comments. What is

01:53:12 Speaker 48: drafted by Gray County staff?

01:53:16 Speaker 48: Great report. Is that there is

01:53:18 Speaker 48: a real focus on housing? This

01:53:21 Speaker 48: is the continuing brand, and and

01:53:23 Speaker 48: indeed all of our interest to

01:53:24 Speaker 48: some degree at these types of

01:53:26 Speaker 48: tables, and there is a lot

01:53:27 Speaker 48: of positives. potentially of getting additional

01:53:28 Speaker 48: resources coming to CAs, additional technical

01:53:29 Speaker 48: support coming to CAs, normalization. There

01:53:31 Speaker 48: isn't a lot of negative comments

01:53:32 Speaker 48: coming out of any entity that's

01:53:37 Speaker 48: looking at this from now, and

01:53:40 Speaker 48: that is certainly the number one

01:53:41 Speaker 48: goal of this proposal. The second

01:53:42 Speaker 48: thing that they're proposing here is

01:53:44 Speaker 48: amalgamation, and the amalgamation is is

01:53:46 Speaker 48: much of the concern in in

01:53:48 Speaker 48: this circle and any circle and

01:53:51 Speaker 48: CA circles and county councils. In

01:53:52 Speaker 48: that specifically, we are losing that

01:53:54 Speaker 48: local input and the context of

01:53:57 Speaker 48: CAs, as we heard initially from

01:54:00 Speaker 48: Nile, was was created by local

01:54:02 Speaker 48: municipalities. That's that's the context of

01:54:04 Speaker 48: CAs. It is wiped out in

01:54:05 Speaker 48: this proposal, and not only that

01:54:06 Speaker 48: is it wiped out. They're not

01:54:07 Speaker 48: telling us what it's going to

01:54:09 Speaker 48: cost. Still planning to build those

01:54:12 Speaker 48: member municipalities in in in this

01:54:15 Speaker 48: amalgamation that. really puts in jeopardy,

01:54:18 Speaker 48: I think, the relationship between municipalities

01:54:20 Speaker 48: who have had a significant pay

01:54:20 Speaker 48: for say to this point that

01:54:21 Speaker 48: we don't see how that is

01:54:24 Speaker 48: continuing forward. And then when we

01:54:26 Speaker 48: come to the the the other

01:54:28 Speaker 48: initiatives of CAs in the Category

01:54:30 Speaker 48: Three context, as is your the

01:54:32 Speaker 48: interest in your your comment, Councillor

01:54:33 Speaker 48: Greg, when the municipalities are are

01:54:36 Speaker 48: then put into Municipalities are then

01:54:36 Speaker 48: put into this situation where they're

01:54:38 Speaker 48: having to put all this money

01:54:43 Speaker 48: forward, maybe more money with less

01:54:44 Speaker 48: say, and then it comes time

01:54:46 Speaker 48: for negotiation on a Category Three

01:54:47 Speaker 48: water quality program. Municipality now negotiating

01:54:48 Speaker 48: with a much larger region is

01:54:53 Speaker 48: already undermined and and and spooked

01:54:57 Speaker 48: by a lack of control of

01:54:58 Speaker 48: the investment. They're already having to

01:54:59 Speaker 49: put out to the regional CA

01:55:01 Speaker 49: and ask, "Well, do you want

01:55:04 Speaker 49: to sign up for an allocart

01:55:05 Speaker 49: service such as water quality?" Inevitably,

01:55:07 Speaker 49: yes. Down the road, that

01:55:09 Speaker 50: will get a very close look,

01:55:11 Speaker 50: and it's in great great jeopardy.

01:55:13 Speaker 50: Looking is in great great jeopardy.

01:55:15 Speaker 50: So, excellent point of of of

01:55:17 Speaker 50: concern there. I go as far

01:55:18 Speaker 50: as even to say that there

01:55:19 Speaker 51: are two initiatives here: the permitting

01:55:21 Speaker 51: interest and the housing interest. Is

01:55:24 Speaker 51: if that's first and foremost their

01:55:25 Speaker 51: interest, and and is is somewhat

01:55:28 Speaker 51: getting some support from those that

01:55:30 Speaker 51: are looking and have opportunity to

01:55:31 Speaker 51: comment to this, their amalgamation proposal

01:55:34 Speaker 51: is actually counter to that goal.

01:55:36 Speaker 51: They're and proposing a great deal

01:55:39 Speaker 51: of chaos that would seemingly be.

01:55:41 Speaker 51: oppositional to their main goal, and

01:55:42 Speaker 51: I think that's an opportunity for

01:55:43 Speaker 51: comment. And I think the the

01:55:46 Speaker 51: motions that have been coming forward,

01:55:47 Speaker 51: we very much appreciate them from

01:55:50 Speaker 51: the municipalities and potentially here from

01:55:52 Speaker 51: county, will continue to echo that

01:55:55 Speaker 51: that your your main goal here

01:55:56 Speaker 51: has maybe some some some some

01:55:58 Speaker 51: life. And yes, maybe our keep

01:56:00 Speaker 51: KPIs are already pretty good. We

01:56:02 Speaker 51: can always do better, and we'd

01:56:04 Speaker 51: be interested to. But your second

01:56:05 Speaker 51: goal here is seemingly oppositional to

01:56:06 Speaker 51: that, and and all of the

01:56:09 Speaker 51: concerns and comments almost fall

01:56:11 Speaker 51: off off. Almost, almost fall off

01:56:13 Speaker 51: off of that second goal. Some

01:56:15 Speaker 51: for some reason. So, thank you

01:56:16 Speaker 51: for the opportunity to speak, though,

01:56:19 Speaker 51: and and great conversation. And thanks

01:56:21 Speaker 51: to staff for this report. It's

01:56:24 Speaker 51: it's been excellent to hear. Thank

01:56:27 Speaker 51: you. I do see Director Taylor

01:56:29 Speaker 51: behind you. So, Director Taylor, it

01:56:31 Speaker 51: looks like you have some. You

01:56:33 Speaker 51: must sense that the break is

01:56:39 Speaker 51: next. So, Director Taylor, thought this

01:56:41 Speaker 51: is welcome to the lectern this

01:56:44 Speaker 51: morning. So you're about to morning.

01:56:46 Speaker 51: Yes, I'm happy to. Through your

01:56:48 Speaker 51: bad wording, yes, I'm happy to

01:56:50 Speaker 51: fill time if that's what's needed.

01:56:52 Speaker 29: I would like to thank Deputy

01:56:54 Speaker 29: Cao Niall and and and Tim

01:56:57 Speaker 29: and Eric, and I'd also like

01:56:59 Speaker 29: to thank Samantha Lawson from Grand

01:57:02 Speaker 29: River Conservation Authority and Jennifer Vincent

01:57:03 Speaker 29: from Nevada Sago Valley Conservation Authority.

01:57:05 Speaker 29: They've all played a huge part

01:57:07 Speaker 29: in in bringing forward the information

01:57:08 Speaker 29: that that we heard here today.

01:57:09 Speaker 29: I'd also just like to touch

01:57:11 Speaker 29: on the fact that we we

01:57:14 Speaker 29: held a local planners meeting with

01:57:16 Speaker 29: planners from from across Gray County

01:57:19 Speaker 29: to discuss the Bill 60 changes,

01:57:21 Speaker 29: but also discuss these these Bill

01:57:23 Speaker 29: 68 Discuss these these Bill sixty

01:57:27 Speaker 29: eight proposals and and as we

01:57:29 Speaker 29: heard today, one of the things

01:57:31 Speaker 29: the planners reiterated over and over

01:57:35 Speaker 29: over is is that that local

01:57:37 Speaker 29: context and that local knowledge and

01:57:38 Speaker 29: in some cases, you know, we're

01:57:40 Speaker 29: dealing with with conservation authority staff

01:57:42 Speaker 29: at various levels, not just at

01:57:43 Speaker 29: the planning level that have been

01:57:45 Speaker 29: here for a generation and and

01:57:48 Speaker 29: they understand the local community, they

01:57:49 Speaker 29: understand how the watershed works, but

01:57:50 Speaker 29: they're also highly accessible and and

01:57:52 Speaker 29: a number of the planners shared

01:57:54 Speaker 29: stories about you know listen. We

01:57:56 Speaker 29: had this this this thing come

01:57:57 Speaker 29: up in our community. We had

01:58:00 Speaker 29: this priority application. We really wanted

01:58:02 Speaker 29: to support and and and take

01:58:03 Speaker 29: it through the processes expeditiously as

02:07:28 Speaker 29: possible. The conservation authority was out

02:07:29 Speaker 29: on site with us in two

02:08:16 Speaker 29: days' time, and and so just

02:08:18 Speaker 29: retaining that institutional knowledge and retaining

02:08:20 Speaker 01: that relationship, that ability to pick

02:08:22 Speaker 29: up the phone and know that

02:08:23 Speaker 29: someone can be there within days,

02:08:26 Speaker 29: or sometimes even hours, and and

02:08:31 Speaker 29: certainly on the emergency management side,

02:08:33 Speaker 29: to we've seen that expedient responsiveness.

02:08:35 Speaker 29: and and and those are things

02:08:37 Speaker 29: that we value greatly in in

02:08:39 Speaker 29: the municipal to conservation authority relationship,

02:08:41 Speaker 29: and and we'd hope would be

02:08:44 Speaker 29: maintained in any future restructuring going

02:08:45 Speaker 29: forward. Okay, thank you very much.

02:08:47 Speaker 29: I don't see any further hands

02:08:48 Speaker 29: up, and we are our voices

02:08:51 Speaker 29: are embedded within this report that

02:08:52 Speaker 29: we're considering supporting and asking for

02:08:54 Speaker 29: it to move forward to go

02:08:55 Speaker 29: in front of of both our.

02:08:58 Speaker 29: MPPs as well as our other

02:09:00 Speaker 29: member municipalities and AMO, and of

02:09:02 Speaker 29: course circulating to the conservation authority

02:09:04 Speaker 29: within Grey County, it's not in

02:09:09 Speaker 29: the motion. But I would also

02:09:11 Speaker 29: hope that Minister Thompson would also

02:09:14 Speaker 29: receive a copy of this as

02:09:16 Speaker 29: well, because so much of our

02:09:17 Speaker 29: discussion has been what does

02:09:19 Speaker 29: it mean for the voices of

02:09:22 Speaker 29: the rural communities alongside the larger

02:09:23 Speaker 29: urban areas that we would

02:09:26 Speaker 29: now be participating together with. So,

02:09:28 Speaker 29: all right, I don't see. any

02:09:30 Speaker 29: further hands. I'll call the question.

02:09:32 Speaker 29: Then all those in favor. Excellent.

02:09:34 Speaker 29: Okay, and that is. I would

02:09:36 Speaker 29: say that would. That's actually unanimously

02:09:37 Speaker 29: passed. All right. Thank you again,

02:09:39 Speaker 29: virtual our guests who have provided

02:09:42 Speaker 29: that extra information. As you can

02:09:43 Speaker 29: see, your presence was very well

02:09:46 Speaker 29: valued. We had a lot of

02:09:47 Speaker 29: questions for you, and we appreciate

02:09:50 Speaker 29: the opportunity to speak directly with

02:09:52 Speaker 29: you. Thank you. Okay. So with

02:09:56 Speaker 29: that, we are going to do.

02:09:57 Speaker 29: a ten-minute break. We'll be back

02:09:59 Speaker 29: here at twelve. Four different items

02:10:01 Speaker 29: to go on our agenda, and

02:10:05 Speaker 29: then lunch will be at twelve

02:10:06 Speaker 29: thirty. So we are hoping that

02:10:08 Speaker 29: we can move expeditiously through the

02:10:09 Speaker 29: others. So see everybody back in

02:10:12 Speaker 29: their seats at twelve o'clock. Thank

02:10:18 Speaker 29: you. I could invite all the

02:10:19 Speaker 29: committee, the whole members, back to

02:10:21 Speaker 29: their seats, please. Thank you. Okay,

02:10:26 Speaker 29: we have the nod from communications

02:10:27 Speaker 29: that we are ready to continue.

02:10:40 Speaker 29: Going to what we're going to

02:10:41 Speaker 29: do from this point forward, actually,

02:10:43 Speaker 29: is we've taken care of this

02:10:44 Speaker 29: one. Okay, so what we're going

02:10:46 Speaker 29: to propose at this point in

02:10:47 Speaker 29: time, in discussion with the clerk,

02:10:49 Speaker 29: in terms of timing before and

02:10:51 Speaker 29: after lunch, item seven C is

02:10:56 Speaker 29: the one that will require more

02:10:57 Speaker 29: discussion, a complete presentation. So it

02:11:01 Speaker 29: would. be best to do that

02:11:06 Speaker 29: one fresh after lunch, which would

02:11:08 Speaker 52: allow us to go to item

02:11:12 Speaker 52: seven D and seven E, and

02:11:13 Speaker 28: we'll see where we are in

02:11:15 Speaker 28: terms of seven F prior to

02:11:18 Speaker 28: lunch. So if we could please

02:11:21 Speaker 28: turn our our attention over to

02:11:24 Speaker 28: item seven D, and this is

02:11:25 Speaker 28: with regards to the Hanover Westray

02:11:27 Speaker 28: proposed boundary adjustment, and it's recommended

02:11:29 Speaker 28: that CAO that so it's recommended

02:11:31 Speaker 28: that report CAO R C W

02:11:32 Speaker 28: twenty twenty five regarding 2025 regarding

02:11:34 Speaker 28: the boundary adjustment proposal between Hanover

02:11:39 Speaker 28: and West Grey be received, and

02:11:43 Speaker 28: that the county agrees supports the

02:11:46 Speaker 28: restructuring proposal between the municipality of

02:11:48 Speaker 28: West Grey and the town of

02:11:50 Speaker 28: Hanover, subject to restructuring

02:11:53 Speaker 28: agreement being approved by the respective

02:11:55 Speaker 28: councils that would see lands transferred

02:11:57 Speaker 28: from the municipality of West Grey

02:12:00 Speaker 28: to the town of Hanover, and

02:12:01 Speaker 28: that correspondence be provided to the

02:12:03 Speaker 28: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,

02:12:04 Speaker 28: the town of Hanover, and the

02:12:08 Speaker 28: municipality of West Grey expressing such

02:12:10 Speaker 28: support and. that action be taken

02:12:14 Speaker 28: prior to council approval, as per

02:12:16 Speaker 28: Section twenty six point six b

02:12:18 Speaker 28: of the procedural bylaw fifty one

02:12:21 Speaker 28: thirty four twenty two. May

02:12:23 Speaker 28: ask for a mover and a

02:12:26 Speaker 28: seconder. So we okay. Well, we've

02:12:28 Speaker 28: got a move by Councillor Patterson.

02:12:31 Speaker 28: I've got it seconded over here

02:12:33 Speaker 28: by Councillor McKay. If that's okay,

02:12:35 Speaker 28: Councillor Eccles. Okay. All right. It's

02:12:38 Speaker 28: on the floor for discussion at

02:12:40 Speaker 28: this point in time. Then, so

02:12:43 Speaker 28: then I will then. invite Director

02:12:44 Speaker 28: Taylor if you would like to

02:12:47 Speaker 28: begin, or I have your name

02:12:50 Speaker 28: as the as the contact. So,

02:12:51 Speaker 28: or would the CAO? Okay, I'll

02:12:58 Speaker 28: invite senior management to come now

02:13:00 Speaker 28: and make a presentation or discussion

02:13:03 Speaker 28: introduction. Okay. To be fair, it's

02:13:05 Speaker 28: because we we juggled things around,

02:13:08 Speaker 28: did a bit of a domino

02:13:10 Speaker 28: shift here in terms of our

02:13:12 Speaker 28: agenda items. So, seeing that

02:13:13 Speaker 28: we are now discussing Hanover and

02:13:17 Speaker 28: West Gray, we'll look to the

02:13:18 Speaker 28: CAO for that introduction. Thank you.

02:13:23 Speaker 28: Thank you very much, Warden Matriscals,

02:13:26 Speaker 28: and I got caught multitasking there.

02:13:27 Speaker 28: So, good afternoon, County Council. So,

02:13:29 Speaker 28: this report provides an overview of

02:13:32 Speaker 28: the. missile boundary construction proposal between

02:13:34 Speaker 28: Hanover and West Gray. This presentation,

02:13:37 Speaker 28: I'll just note, is adapted from

02:13:39 Speaker 28: a presentation that was delivered at

02:13:41 Speaker 28: the November 19th public meeting that

02:13:43 Speaker 28: was held jointly in Elma by

02:13:47 Speaker 28: both municipalities. So today, I'll just

02:13:49 Speaker 28: summarize some of the background of

02:13:53 Speaker 28: the proposal, the lands that are

02:13:55 Speaker 28: in question, the financial terms, some

02:13:57 Speaker 28: of the benefits that we think

02:13:59 Speaker 28: will be achieved by this proposal,

02:14:02 Speaker 28: some of the public feedback received.

02:14:05 Speaker 28: and next slide, please, or can

02:14:07 Speaker 28: I do that? Please. So, council

02:14:09 Speaker 28: may some councilors may recall back

02:14:13 Speaker 28: in 2021, county council directed staff

02:14:14 Speaker 28: to work with interested member municipalities

02:14:16 Speaker 28: on facilitating discussions on future growth

02:14:18 Speaker 28: and infrastructure needs where two or

02:14:20 Speaker 28: more municipal boundaries are involved. During

02:14:23 Speaker 28: this term of council, Hannah and

02:14:26 Speaker 28: West Gray have worked together on

02:14:28 Speaker 28: a plan intended to achieve mutual.

02:14:33 Speaker 28: benefits for both communities and the

02:14:35 Speaker 28: overall region, this was initially triggered

02:14:38 Speaker 28: by comprehensive review work completed by

02:14:40 Speaker 28: Hanover, and which noted that the

02:14:43 Speaker 28: commercial employment lands by 2046, which

02:14:44 Speaker 28: was the current growth horizon at

02:14:46 Speaker 28: that time. Since 2023, representatives from

02:14:51 Speaker 28: both municipalities and Gray County have

02:14:59 Speaker 28: discussed options to support growth and

02:15:00 Speaker 28: shared prosperity. Gray County has helped

02:15:02 Speaker 28: to facilitate assist with provide. To

02:15:05 Speaker 28: facilitate and assist with providing some

02:15:06 Speaker 28: research and background information to help

02:15:08 Speaker 28: inform some of those conversations,

02:15:11 Speaker 28: a working group was established, including

02:15:13 Speaker 28: the mayors from both municipalities, as

02:15:17 Speaker 28: well as a council member from

02:15:19 Speaker 28: each municipality, and has met regularly

02:15:21 Speaker 28: throughout this council term. The working

02:15:23 Speaker 28: group explored a number of options

02:15:25 Speaker 28: and recommended a boundary adjustment. Both

02:15:27 Speaker 28: West Grey and Henry councils have

02:15:29 Speaker 28: supported in principle. this boundary adjustment.

02:15:31 Speaker 28: A memorandum of understanding has been

02:15:33 Speaker 28: executed between the two municipalities to

02:15:35 Speaker 28: establishing a restructuring framework and to

02:15:41 Speaker 28: proceed under the Municipal Act towards

02:15:43 Speaker 28: a formal boundary adjustment agreement for

02:15:45 Speaker 28: council's consideration. As noted, both councils

02:15:48 Speaker 28: held a joint public meeting on

02:15:50 Speaker 28: November nineteenth, twenty twenty-five, in Elmwood.

02:15:53 Speaker 28: So the lands, what what what

02:15:55 Speaker 28: what lands are being considered with

02:15:57 Speaker 28: respect to this proposal? So the

02:16:00 Speaker 28: agreement proposal. So the agreement proposes

02:16:02 Speaker 28: to transfer and adjust certain lands

02:16:04 Speaker 28: from West Gray to Hanover. In

02:16:06 Speaker 28: total, just over one thousand six

02:16:07 Speaker 28: hundred, or approximately six and one

02:16:08 Speaker 28: thousand six hundred thirty-four acres, situated

02:16:10 Speaker 28: to the north and east of

02:16:12 Speaker 28: Hanover's existing boundaries. Here's a map

02:16:14 Speaker 28: which shows the the lands that

02:16:17 Speaker 28: are shown in the burgundy color.

02:16:19 Speaker 28: The two main areas proposed in

02:16:23 Speaker 28: terms of being added to the

02:16:24 Speaker 28: town of Hanover. called the Northlands,

02:16:26 Speaker 28: which are east of Graver's Line,

02:16:27 Speaker 28: north of Gray Road 28, and

02:16:31 Speaker 28: then a large pocket that is

02:16:32 Speaker 28: south of Gray Road 4 and

02:16:36 Speaker 28: primarily east of of Gray Road

02:16:39 Speaker 28: 28. And then there's also the

02:16:41 Speaker 28: Bucks Crossing former golf course lands

02:16:43 Speaker 28: north of Gray Road 4,

02:16:45 Speaker 28: as well as a small portion

02:16:47 Speaker 28: that has the Hanover Rail Trail

02:16:51 Speaker 28: that runs through that portion, which

02:16:53 Speaker 28: would then keep that asset. within,

02:16:55 Speaker 28: completely within the town of Hanover.

02:16:57 Speaker 28: This map shows the air photos

02:17:00 Speaker 28: of them, so the areas outlined

02:17:02 Speaker 28: in red are the lands that

02:17:06 Speaker 28: would be added to the town

02:17:09 Speaker 28: of Hanover, subject to, of course,

02:17:13 Speaker 28: the minister approving that restructuring order

02:17:14 Speaker 28: and subject to both municipal councils

02:17:17 Speaker 28: finalizing the agreement. It should be

02:17:19 Speaker 28: noted that the lands proposed to

02:17:21 Speaker 28: be added to Hanover go beyond

02:17:23 Speaker 28: the growth needs of the current

02:17:25 Speaker 28: planning horizon, and these additional lands

02:17:28 Speaker 28: will allow Hanover to plan for

02:17:31 Speaker 28: the long-term growth and infrastructure needs.

02:17:33 Speaker 28: Development within the affected lands will

02:17:34 Speaker 28: be phased over years. So, recognizing

02:17:37 Speaker 28: West Gray would no longer receive

02:17:40 Speaker 28: assessment from the transferred lands, or

02:17:42 Speaker 28: receive any increased assessment based on

02:17:45 Speaker 28: the future growth. that would occur

02:17:48 Speaker 28: on these lands, the two municipalities

02:17:51 Speaker 28: have agreed in principle that Hanover

02:17:53 Speaker 28: will provide ten million dollars in

02:17:56 Speaker 28: financial compensation that we paid as

02:17:58 Speaker 28: five hundred thousand dollars per year

02:18:04 Speaker 28: over a twenty-year period. In terms

02:18:06 Speaker 28: of other considerations, there is no

02:18:10 Speaker 28: specific development that's planned at this

02:18:11 Speaker 28: time on on these lands. Future

02:18:13 Speaker 28: development is expected to include a

02:18:16 Speaker 28: mixture of commercial, industrial, and residential

02:18:18 Speaker 28: uses. There is no obligation for

02:18:21 Speaker 28: any property owner to develop their

02:18:23 Speaker 28: land, and the working group and

02:18:26 Speaker 28: both councils have been right up

02:18:31 Speaker 28: front in saying that farming can

02:18:33 Speaker 28: continue. And the rights of existing

02:18:36 Speaker 28: farmers, if they want to continue

02:18:37 Speaker 28: to farm the land, will be

02:18:44 Speaker 28: able to do so for

02:18:47 Speaker 28: as long as they wish to

02:18:50 Speaker 28: continue to do that. All landowners

02:18:51 Speaker 28: will maintain their right, based on

02:18:54 Speaker 28: their existing uses, that they use

02:18:56 Speaker 28: those properties for as long as

02:18:58 Speaker 28: they they so choose. and that

02:19:01 Speaker 28: was that was something that was

02:19:03 Speaker 28: definitely stressed by both both municipalities

02:19:06 Speaker 28: as well as the working group

02:19:12 Speaker 28: right from day one. In terms

02:19:14 Speaker 28: of some of the benefits for

02:19:15 Speaker 28: the restructuring proposal for West Grey,

02:19:17 Speaker 28: the compensation that Hanover will be

02:19:20 Speaker 28: providing back to West Grey can

02:19:24 Speaker 28: be reinvested to support things like

02:19:27 Speaker 28: infrastructure service level enhancements for

02:19:31 Speaker 28: the benefit of West Grey residents.

02:19:32 Speaker 28: we anticipate where we see growth

02:19:34 Speaker 28: in terms of employment land growth

02:19:37 Speaker 28: and commercial land growth. There's usually

02:19:39 Speaker 28: a spinoff growth effect in neighboring

02:19:42 Speaker 28: municipalities, so we anticipate that will

02:19:45 Speaker 28: happen as well within residential

02:19:47 Speaker 28: industrial sectors. And new Hanover development

02:19:52 Speaker 28: translates to new services amenities that

02:19:54 Speaker 28: benefit residents in both municipalities. And

02:19:58 Speaker 28: this goes to the notion that

02:20:00 Speaker 28: in some cases, a person.

02:20:02 Speaker 28: a family may live in in

02:20:05 Speaker 28: one community. May their kids may

02:20:07 Speaker 28: go to a school and

02:20:10 Speaker 28: play play sports in another

02:20:12 Speaker 28: community. They may access services and

02:20:15 Speaker 28: commercial needs in a completely different

02:20:17 Speaker 28: community. There's in some cases there's

02:20:18 Speaker 28: no missal boundaries when you're accessing

02:20:20 Speaker 28: those types of services, and so

02:20:26 Speaker 28: that's where again everyone benefits from

02:20:28 Speaker 28: from some of those services and

02:20:31 Speaker 28: amenities being added throughout all of

02:20:33 Speaker 28: our communities. In terms of Hannah.

02:20:36 Speaker 28: In terms of Hanover benefits, for

02:20:38 Speaker 28: Hanover, the adjustment delivers long-term land

02:20:41 Speaker 28: supply to support future commercial, industrial,

02:20:43 Speaker 28: and residential uses. That growth yields

02:20:48 Speaker 28: new assessment and taxes and creates

02:20:50 Speaker 28: jobs and homes for the region.

02:20:52 Speaker 28: For Gray County, development brings potentially

02:20:54 Speaker 28: new revenue through new tax assessment.

02:20:56 Speaker 28: There would be potentially, as development

02:21:00 Speaker 28: happens on those lands, and assuming

02:21:03 Speaker 28: that development charges still exist, that

02:21:03 Speaker 28: those can be used to help

02:21:05 Speaker 28: enhance services to support that new

02:21:06 Speaker 28: growth. It also helps to deliver

02:21:09 Speaker 28: jobs and housing for residents throughout

02:21:12 Speaker 28: the region. Sorry, this positions South

02:21:14 Speaker 28: Grey as a vibrant economic zone

02:21:15 Speaker 28: with shovel-ready lands available for development,

02:21:18 Speaker 28: which aligns really well with our

02:21:20 Speaker 28: economic development, tourism, culture master plan.

02:21:21 Speaker 28: Other considerations. So, properties entering Hanover

02:21:23 Speaker 28: would pay Hanover's tax rate, which

02:21:27 Speaker 28: is slightly higher than West Grey's

02:21:30 Speaker 28: rate, and therefore Hanover is committed

02:21:32 Speaker 28: to phasing in these tax increases

02:21:35 Speaker 28: over five years to help ease

02:21:38 Speaker 28: that transition. Hanover will provide most

02:21:40 Speaker 28: services to the lands, including police,

02:21:42 Speaker 28: fire, bylaw, library, parks, recreation and

02:21:49 Speaker 28: culture, and waste management. So, in

02:21:52 Speaker 28: terms of the comments received, both

02:21:53 Speaker 28: at the public meeting as well

02:21:56 Speaker 28: as comments in writing, residents requested

02:21:58 Speaker 28: clarification on property impacts, tax implications,

02:22:00 Speaker 28: and service changes. There was concerns

02:22:02 Speaker 28: including the increased taxes, traffic, subdivision

02:22:04 Speaker 28: activity, and commercial development. We heard

02:22:05 Speaker 28: questions about whether hunting would still

02:22:08 Speaker 28: be permitted after the lands become

02:22:10 Speaker 28: part of Hanover. There were

02:22:13 Speaker 28: suggestions to reevaluate the proposal, consider

02:22:15 Speaker 28: other. alternatives. Ensure the tax base

02:22:18 Speaker 28: isn't affected, especially around water sewer

02:22:21 Speaker 28: connection requirements or financial supports for

02:22:23 Speaker 28: affected residents. Some landers stated that

02:22:25 Speaker 28: they're they're just not interested in

02:22:26 Speaker 28: urban development and and were opposing

02:22:30 Speaker 28: the restructuring proposal. Others asked for

02:22:34 Speaker 28: clarification regarding benefits for both municipalities

02:22:38 Speaker 28: and property owners, and for detail

02:22:40 Speaker 28: on the financial modeling and assessment

02:22:43 Speaker 28: reports. Soggy Valley Conservation Authority expressed

02:22:45 Speaker 28: support for responsible growth, did recommend

02:22:47 Speaker 28: updates of floodplain mapping and review

02:22:50 Speaker 28: of erosion hazards and wetlands, which

02:22:53 Speaker 28: could be captured as part of

02:22:55 Speaker 28: the future future phases through the

02:22:57 Speaker 28: planning processes. And then there was

02:22:59 Speaker 28: also questions about next steps. So

02:23:02 Speaker 28: in terms of next steps, so

02:23:04 Speaker 28: today obviously this report is before

02:23:07 Speaker 28: County Council. The minister does require.

02:23:10 Speaker 28: the upper-tier municipality through a restructuring

02:23:15 Speaker 28: proposal to to indicate whether it

02:23:16 Speaker 28: supports that restructuring proposal between two

02:23:18 Speaker 28: municipalities. Reports will also be presented

02:23:21 Speaker 28: to Hanover Council. We understand on

02:23:24 Speaker 28: December 15th and December 16th, so

02:23:25 Speaker 28: next week, regarding the actual restructuring

02:23:27 Speaker 28: agreement that is being finalized as

02:23:29 Speaker 28: as we speak. As part of

02:23:33 Speaker 28: those reports, the councils of Hanover

02:23:35 Speaker 28: and West Grey will review all

02:23:37 Speaker 28: the comments received during the council.

02:23:39 Speaker 28: Received during the consultation process and

02:23:40 Speaker 28: carefully consider that that boundary adjustment

02:23:43 Speaker 28: agreement. Should both councils approve the

02:23:45 Speaker 28: agreement, the next step will be

02:23:46 Speaker 28: to prepare and submit a formal

02:23:47 Speaker 28: restructuring proposal to the to the

02:23:49 Speaker 28: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,

02:23:51 Speaker 28: which is targeted to be submitted

02:23:53 Speaker 28: either by the end of this

02:23:56 Speaker 28: year or early 2026. Following review,

02:24:03 Speaker 28: the minister may approve the agreement

02:24:05 Speaker 28: via restructuring order under the Municipal

02:24:07 Speaker 28: Act. If the minister does the

02:24:09 Speaker 28: restructuring order, after that order, Hanover

02:24:11 Speaker 28: and Gray County would complete official

02:24:13 Speaker 20: plan and conference of zoning bylaw

02:24:14 Speaker 20: updates. As noted earlier, the ministry

02:24:17 Speaker 20: does require the upper tier municipality

02:24:19 Speaker 20: to indicate whether they support the

02:24:20 Speaker 20: restructuring proposal. Given that both municipal

02:24:22 Speaker 20: councils have supported this boundary adjustment

02:24:24 Speaker 20: in principle, the potential benefits that

02:24:26 Speaker 20: will be achieved as a result

02:24:31 Speaker 20: of this restructuring. proposal, as well

02:24:34 Speaker 20: as the commitment to mitigate any

02:24:36 Speaker 20: potential impacts to property owners within

02:24:39 Speaker 20: the lands, it's recommended that County

02:24:41 Speaker 20: Council support this restructuring proposal, subject

02:24:43 Speaker 20: to both municipal councils approving the

02:24:45 Speaker 20: restructuring agreement. You have the motion

02:24:47 Speaker 53: that's in the report. Before I

02:24:51 Speaker 53: do, before I go to the

02:24:53 Speaker 53: motion and before open up to

02:24:55 Speaker 53: questions, just want to say, like

02:24:57 Speaker 53: in terms of the the the

02:24:59 Speaker 53: work. with both Hanover staff, Westray

02:25:01 Speaker 53: staff, has been absolutely amazing. The

02:25:03 Speaker 53: both mayors and the two council

02:25:06 Speaker 53: representatives on the working group. There's

02:25:08 Speaker 53: been a lot of meetings and

02:25:10 Speaker 53: and great discussions throughout those last

02:25:12 Speaker 53: two years. And and the working

02:25:13 Speaker 53: group always had the focus of

02:25:15 Speaker 53: making sure that any potential impacts

02:25:17 Speaker 53: that could come to this are

02:25:20 Speaker 53: mitigated to the best extent possible.

02:25:27 Speaker 53: I also want to. thank county

02:25:31 Speaker 53: staff that have been involved throughout

02:25:33 Speaker 53: this process. Director Scott Taylor has

02:25:35 Speaker 53: been instrumental as part of this

02:25:37 Speaker 54: process. Jaclyn Morrison, our our county

02:25:39 Speaker 54: solicitor, has been involved with this.

02:25:42 Speaker 54: Tara Water, our clerk, has been

02:25:44 Speaker 29: involved throughout this. Rob Hatton, our

02:25:47 Speaker 29: our communications manager, Carolyn Bailey, who

02:25:49 Speaker 29: is our planning technician, has helped

02:25:53 Speaker 29: with some of the mapping work

02:25:54 Speaker 29: with respect to this project. Lacey

02:25:55 Speaker 29: Thompson is also helping, as we

02:25:58 Speaker 29: speak, to to make sure the

02:26:00 Speaker 29: legal descriptions on the lands reflect

02:26:04 Speaker 29: what the ministry needs, and is

02:26:05 Speaker 29: working through some of those pieces

02:26:07 Speaker 29: as well. So, I'm I'm sure

02:26:08 Speaker 29: I'm missing some folks in terms

02:26:10 Speaker 29: of thanking for for all the

02:26:13 Speaker 29: work on this, but it's been

02:26:16 Speaker 29: a true team effort, and and

02:26:18 Speaker 29: I think is a great example

02:26:20 Speaker 29: of what Team Gray can be

02:26:23 Speaker 29: all about when we work

02:26:25 Speaker 29: work together to to achieve economic

02:26:28 Speaker 29: success. Okay, thank you very much

02:26:29 Speaker 29: for that introduction. And indeed, it

02:26:31 Speaker 29: is an example of a trio

02:26:34 Speaker 29: of teams working together, and how

02:26:36 Speaker 29: we can be a benefit to

02:26:38 Speaker 29: help with all those negotiations that

02:26:42 Speaker 29: have gone on, and all the

02:26:43 Speaker 29: expertise you just listed of the

02:26:45 Speaker 29: county staff as well as the

02:26:48 Speaker 29: town, each of the town staff

02:26:50 Speaker 29: as well. All right. So with

02:26:54 Speaker 29: that, then it is on the

02:26:56 Speaker 29: floor for questions. and comments. We'll

02:26:58 Speaker 29: begin with Councillor Mackey. Thank you,

02:26:59 Speaker 29: Warden, and good afternoon, fellow Council

02:27:01 Speaker 55: members. I'd just like to congratulate

02:27:04 Speaker 55: both Hanover and West Gray. This

02:27:05 Speaker 55: has been a long process. It's

02:27:07 Speaker 06: been going on for an extremely

02:27:09 Speaker 06: long time, and to the Planning

02:27:10 Speaker 06: Department, Randy, to all the staff

02:27:12 Speaker 06: that you mentioned, helping facilitate this,

02:27:14 Speaker 06: arbitrate, whatever word you want to.

02:27:16 Speaker 06: use, yours. But it's a really

02:27:20 Speaker 06: good news story for all of

02:27:22 Speaker 06: Gray County, not just for Hanover

02:27:24 Speaker 06: and West Gray, but the entire

02:27:26 Speaker 06: Gray County. As you mentioned, Randy,

02:27:27 Speaker 06: the municipal boundaries are don't really

02:27:29 Speaker 06: matter to the individual person that's

02:27:32 Speaker 06: working in Hanover, working in West

02:27:33 Speaker 06: Gray, living in one municipality or

02:27:35 Speaker 06: the other. It's going to bring

02:27:36 Speaker 06: growth to the southern part, and

02:27:37 Speaker 06: that's good for all of us.

02:27:40 Speaker 06: So, congratulations, Hanover and West Gray.

02:27:42 Speaker 06: Okay. Thank you. And any other

02:27:44 Speaker 06: questions or comments? And it was

02:27:46 Speaker 06: good, good discussion at the at

02:27:48 Speaker 06: the Agricultural Advisory Committee this week

02:27:50 Speaker 06: too. You made the same presentation,

02:27:52 Speaker 06: and and there was a good

02:27:54 Speaker 06: lens of of input from there.

02:27:55 Speaker 06: And the process continues to take

02:27:57 Speaker 06: on people's input along the way,

02:27:59 Speaker 06: the way that it's been outlined

02:28:02 Speaker 06: in the report. Okay. excellent. So

02:28:04 Speaker 06: with that, then I see no

02:28:06 Speaker 06: further hands up. Then I will

02:28:08 Speaker 06: call the vote. Then all those

02:28:10 Speaker 06: in favor, and that motion is

02:28:11 Speaker 06: carried. Thank you very much. See

02:28:14 Speaker 06: you. Okay, looks like we've got

02:28:16 Speaker 06: time to do one more item,

02:28:18 Speaker 06: 7E. So I'd like to invite

02:28:20 Speaker 06: Director Myers up, and it's recommended

02:28:21 Speaker 06: that Report E D T C

02:28:23 Speaker 06: C W 1725 regarding the Team

02:28:25 Speaker 06: Gray Memorandum of Understanding be received,

02:28:27 Speaker 06: and that Gray County Council endorse.

02:28:28 Speaker 06: the Team Gray Memorandum of Understanding

02:28:31 Speaker 06: as presented, to support regional economic

02:28:35 Speaker 06: development and investment readiness, and that

02:28:37 Speaker 06: the clerk of the the warden

02:28:39 Speaker 06: and the clerk be authorized to

02:28:41 Speaker 06: sign the Team Gray MOU, and

02:28:42 Speaker 06: that this report, including the Team

02:28:44 Speaker 06: Gray MOU, be circulated to all

02:28:45 Speaker 06: Gray County member municipalities for consideration,

02:28:47 Speaker 06: and signing. So, with that, may

02:28:49 Speaker 06: I ask for a mover? Move

02:28:51 Speaker 06: by Councilor Kentner, seconded by Councilor

02:28:53 Speaker 06: Dobreen. It's now. Mr. Dubrin, it's

02:28:55 Speaker 06: now on the floor for discussion.

02:28:57 Speaker 06: So, welcome, Director Myers. Excellent. Thank

02:28:58 Speaker 06: you so much, Warden, and good

02:29:00 Speaker 06: afternoon, County Council. Just there we

02:29:02 Speaker 06: go, flipping our screens around a

02:29:04 Speaker 06: little bit. I've got a presentation

02:29:06 Speaker 06: to go along with the MOU.

02:29:07 Speaker 06: There's a lot in this report

02:29:08 Speaker 06: and attachments, so I'm going to

02:29:12 Speaker 06: focus on the high levels of

02:29:15 Speaker 06: why, how did we get to

02:29:16 Speaker 06: this stage, and how was this

02:29:17 Speaker 06: developed, and then take you through

02:29:18 Speaker 06: the draft MOU so that you

02:29:20 Speaker 06: know what it encompasses. So the

02:29:21 Speaker 06: Team Gray MOU, this was recommended

02:29:22 Speaker 06: in 2023 through the development of

02:29:26 Speaker 06: the Economic Development, Tourism, and Culture

02:29:28 Speaker 06: Master Plan, and it fit under

02:29:29 Speaker 06: Priority Number One of Leadership and

02:29:30 Speaker 06: Collaboration, where we work together to

02:29:32 Speaker 06: build cohesion. Talking about how Gray

02:29:35 Speaker 06: County takes a regional approach to

02:29:36 Speaker 06: economic development, tourism, and culture, working

02:29:37 Speaker 06: on behalf of all nine of

02:29:38 Speaker 06: our member municipalities. Is everything that

02:29:40 Speaker 06: we do happens in our municipalities,

02:29:42 Speaker 06: in your municipalities, for our people.

02:29:42 Speaker 06: So the top priority. is building

02:29:44 Speaker 06: Team Gray, where we focus on

02:29:46 Speaker 06: collaboration, not competition, to build trust

02:29:47 Speaker 06: and to seed success. So collectively,

02:29:48 Speaker 06: we know that we carry a

02:29:50 Speaker 06: stronger voice and we have a

02:29:51 Speaker 06: better likelihood of achieving those goals

02:29:54 Speaker 06: more effectively, efficiently, and in a

02:29:56 Speaker 06: timely manner with fewer resources required,

02:29:59 Speaker 06: most likely. And we also understand

02:30:00 Speaker 06: that a cohesive vision followed by

02:30:01 Speaker 06: effective and true collaboration is going

02:30:03 Speaker 06: to benefit us all. So you

02:30:05 Speaker 06: see it here in priority number

02:30:06 Speaker 06: one. It is 1.4 development. 1.4

02:30:08 Speaker 06: developed the team gray memorandum of

02:30:10 Speaker 06: understanding, and what you see on

02:30:12 Speaker 06: this slide, this is everything that

02:30:13 Speaker 06: this team gray MOU applies to

02:30:15 Speaker 06: right now. It could apply to

02:30:16 Speaker 06: so many things, but for right

02:30:18 Speaker 06: now, in this very first iteration

02:30:19 Speaker 06: of the MOU, we are focusing

02:30:22 Speaker 06: very much on priority one and

02:30:25 Speaker 06: two of the EDTC master plan.

02:30:26 Speaker 06: This truly is a made in

02:30:28 Speaker 06: gray approach. This is, you know,

02:30:29 Speaker 06: a phrase that we use quite

02:30:30 Speaker 06: often, and we really truly mean

02:30:33 Speaker 06: it. when we talk about the

02:30:36 Speaker 06: made in gray approach. This is

02:30:37 Speaker 06: an opportunity to formalize the collaboration

02:30:38 Speaker 06: that we're already doing. It celebrates

02:30:39 Speaker 06: and holds on to who we

02:30:44 Speaker 06: are, both as individually and collectively,

02:30:46 Speaker 06: while we plan and grow together.

02:30:47 Speaker 06: And that individual and collective is

02:30:49 Speaker 06: really important in this. So you'll

02:30:51 Speaker 06: see the the note on here

02:30:53 Speaker 06: where it says local priorities and

02:30:54 Speaker 06: character have an important

02:30:56 Speaker 06: role to play. Our regional strength

02:30:59 Speaker 06: comes from the collection of nine

02:31:01 Speaker 06: unique member municipalities. So encouraged through

02:31:03 Speaker 06: this or any of the work

02:31:05 Speaker 06: that we're doing is the same

02:31:06 Speaker 06: everywhere. Gray County loses its its

02:31:08 Speaker 06: excitement and its draw and the

02:31:10 Speaker 06: ability for us to sell the

02:31:12 Speaker 06: region to people who are here

02:31:14 Speaker 06: or people who want to come

02:31:15 Speaker 06: here. If we're all the same,

02:31:17 Speaker 06: so we want to hold on

02:31:18 Speaker 06: to that local knowledge, that local

02:31:21 Speaker 06: drive, the character and the priorities

02:31:23 Speaker 06: that mean something to you on

02:31:24 Speaker 06: the ground. When we wrap those

02:31:26 Speaker 06: all up into one, we have

02:31:29 Speaker 06: a really impressive Gray County to

02:31:30 Speaker 06: look at. So doing this together,

02:31:33 Speaker 06: it helps us to decide what

02:31:34 Speaker 06: we want the county as a

02:31:36 Speaker 06: whole to. look like, and allows

02:31:37 Speaker 06: us to take a proactive

02:31:39 Speaker 06: and collaborative approach, so that we

02:31:42 Speaker 06: can get there in a sustainable

02:31:45 Speaker 06: way. We want to be able

02:31:47 Speaker 06: to decide collectively what that growth

02:31:49 Speaker 06: looks like. We don't want it

02:31:51 Speaker 06: to just happen to us. We

02:31:52 Speaker 06: want you to have a vision,

02:31:53 Speaker 06: so that we can support that.

02:31:54 Speaker 06: So the team for MOU has

02:31:56 Speaker 06: two very distinct parts. They're related,

02:31:58 Speaker 06: but they're distinct. So the first

02:32:00 Speaker 06: one is the MOU that is

02:32:02 Speaker 06: shared here today through this report

02:32:03 Speaker 06: that we're proposing applies equally to

02:32:04 Speaker 06: us as the county and to

02:32:06 Speaker 06: all nine of our member municipalities.

02:32:08 Speaker 06: where the annual project work plans

02:32:10 Speaker 06: that accompany the MOU, those are

02:32:11 Speaker 06: specific to your municipalities in the

02:32:13 Speaker 06: county. It may be one

02:32:15 Speaker 06: municipality in the county, it

02:32:17 Speaker 06: may be multiple, as the example

02:32:18 Speaker 06: we just saw here with Hanover

02:32:21 Speaker 06: and West Grey. What a great

02:32:22 Speaker 06: example of Team Grey! So, some

02:32:24 Speaker 06: municipalities may choose to opt out

02:32:26 Speaker 06: of projects specific because they don't

02:32:28 Speaker 06: have the resources. There's not a

02:32:30 Speaker 06: certain priority in a given year,

02:32:32 Speaker 06: and that's okay. This just enables

02:32:33 Speaker 06: us to have a shared understanding

02:32:34 Speaker 06: of what what those projects. might

02:32:35 Speaker 06: be, what our rules and responsibilities

02:32:36 Speaker 06: might be in it, and what

02:32:38 Speaker 06: the timeline and commitment looks like.

02:32:42 Speaker 06: So why an MOU? We're really

02:32:43 Speaker 06: fortunate to have great working relationships

02:32:45 Speaker 06: here between Grey County and our

02:32:46 Speaker 06: member municipalities. We know it is

02:32:47 Speaker 06: not like that everywhere, so we

02:32:48 Speaker 06: are very very fortunate, and we

02:32:49 Speaker 06: see this as an opportunity to

02:32:50 Speaker 06: strengthen that collaborative relationship between Grey

02:32:52 Speaker 06: and our member municipalities, to clarify

02:32:54 Speaker 06: roles and responsibilities, which will help

02:32:56 Speaker 06: us improve continuity as well during

02:32:57 Speaker 06: staff transition. As well during staff

02:32:59 Speaker 06: transitions, by having a standardized and

02:33:01 Speaker 06: transferable framework, there's always lots of

02:33:03 Speaker 06: movement on the ground with staffing

02:33:05 Speaker 06: locally at the county. Everywhere we

02:33:07 Speaker 06: look, there's movement. So having something

02:33:09 Speaker 06: that people can pick up and

02:33:11 Speaker 06: understand, this is what applies to

02:33:14 Speaker 06: us. This is my role in

02:33:15 Speaker 06: this work specifically, would be really

02:33:17 Speaker 06: beneficial. The accompanying annual work plans

02:33:18 Speaker 06: then serve as a mechanism for

02:33:20 Speaker 06: proposing and evaluating or implementing those

02:33:22 Speaker 06: projects that are tailored to individual

02:33:24 Speaker 06: municipalities. It allows us to avoid

02:33:26 Speaker 06: duplication of effort, optimize the resource.

02:33:26 Speaker 06: Optimize the resources that we have,

02:33:28 Speaker 06: and begin to really, truly operationalize

02:33:31 Speaker 06: the discussions and the opportunities that

02:33:32 Speaker 06: are being commuted through our Economic

02:33:33 Speaker 06: Development Leadership Series. And why now?

02:33:35 Speaker 06: Not two years ago, when we

02:33:37 Speaker 06: approved the EDTC Master Plan, we

02:33:39 Speaker 06: weren't ready. We to do a

02:33:41 Speaker 06: lot of foundational work to get

02:33:43 Speaker 06: us to this point of actually

02:33:45 Speaker 06: having something that we could commit

02:33:46 Speaker 06: to you, you could commit to

02:33:47 Speaker 06: us, and vice versa. So there

02:33:52 Speaker 06: was a lot of foundational research

02:33:53 Speaker 06: and preparatory work that was essential

02:33:55 Speaker 06: in those first two years. to

02:33:56 Speaker 06: get us to this point of

02:33:58 Speaker 06: having something to be able to

02:33:59 Speaker 06: put on paper. So during that

02:34:01 Speaker 06: time, we have positioned our teams

02:34:04 Speaker 06: for success locally and at

02:34:05 Speaker 06: the county. We've introduced relevant tools,

02:34:07 Speaker 06: templates. We've got shared platforms now.

02:34:09 Speaker 06: Well, we've also deepened our

02:34:11 Speaker 06: understanding about the opportunities and the

02:34:13 Speaker 06: processes, perspectives that we need to

02:34:15 Speaker 06: be able to advance right across

02:34:16 Speaker 06: gray. So now, with that shared

02:34:19 Speaker 06: understanding and that access to the

02:34:20 Speaker 06: common tools, the time seems right

02:34:22 Speaker 06: to formalize the collaboration and to

02:34:24 Speaker 06: also seek commitment from all parties

02:34:26 Speaker 06: to collect. Commitment from all parties

02:34:28 Speaker 06: to collectively adopt and leverage those

02:34:30 Speaker 06: tools that we have developed and

02:34:31 Speaker 06: acquired, because we don't want to

02:34:34 Speaker 06: be investing in resources if they're

02:34:36 Speaker 06: just going to sit there. That

02:34:37 Speaker 06: is not the intent. So this

02:34:38 Speaker 06: enables us to commit to those

02:34:40 Speaker 06: uses. And it has been a

02:34:41 Speaker 06: minute to get here. So there's

02:34:44 Speaker 06: been a lot of rounds of

02:34:45 Speaker 06: engagement to this point, and I

02:34:46 Speaker 06: just wanted to put it all

02:34:49 Speaker 06: together on the slide for you,

02:34:50 Speaker 06: so that you could see, as

02:34:52 Speaker 06: I mentioned, the idea of having

02:34:54 Speaker 06: a team great MOU that came

02:34:55 Speaker 06: from the development of our master

02:34:56 Speaker 06: plan, which we did with all

02:34:58 Speaker 06: of our member municipalities. over the

02:35:02 Speaker 06: course of eight months in 2023,

02:35:04 Speaker 06: we then drafted the MOU following

02:35:05 Speaker 06: three rounds of engagement with economic

02:35:08 Speaker 06: development staff and every one of

02:35:10 Speaker 06: your CIOs. Through 2024, we talked

02:35:11 Speaker 06: to the economic development working group

02:35:12 Speaker 06: every quarter. In May 2025, I

02:35:13 Speaker 06: attended the local CIO meeting where

02:35:15 Speaker 06: we talked with all CIOs together,

02:35:18 Speaker 06: and then I had a one-on-one

02:35:19 Speaker 06: meeting with each of your CIOs

02:35:22 Speaker 06: independently to get their advice for

02:35:25 Speaker 06: what would end up in this

02:35:27 Speaker 06: draft. Once we had a draft,

02:35:29 Speaker 06: we then went back to the

02:35:31 Speaker 06: C. We then went back to

02:35:34 Speaker 06: the CAOs. We went back to

02:35:36 Speaker 06: the EDO working group in November,

02:35:38 Speaker 06: and now the final that you

02:35:40 Speaker 06: see in front of you today—the

02:35:43 Speaker 06: work plan template, the council report,

02:35:44 Speaker 06: and the draft MOU—was circulated again

02:35:45 Speaker 06: in December to all CAOs and

02:35:47 Speaker 06: EDOS through the local meeting, and

02:35:48 Speaker 06: then as well through email. And

02:35:50 Speaker 06: the changes right up until a

02:35:51 Speaker 06: week and a half ago are

02:35:53 Speaker 06: what you see here in front

02:35:54 Speaker 06: of you today for your consideration.

02:35:55 Speaker 06: So, looking at the Team Gray

02:35:57 Speaker 06: MOU itself, I will not go

02:36:00 Speaker 06: through here. in detail because you've

02:36:02 Speaker 06: had it, you've read it. But

02:36:04 Speaker 06: the purpose really is to set

02:36:06 Speaker 06: out that framework for collaboration between

02:36:07 Speaker 06: Gray and our nine member municipalities,

02:36:11 Speaker 06: specifically around economic development and investment

02:36:13 Speaker 06: readiness, where we signal our mutual

02:36:15 Speaker 06: commitment, streamline cooperation, and create a

02:36:17 Speaker 06: clearer, more attractive environment for investors,

02:36:18 Speaker 06: whether they're local investors who are

02:36:20 Speaker 06: looking to expand, to maintain their

02:36:22 Speaker 06: business, or who want to come

02:36:23 Speaker 06: to this region. The guiding document

02:36:26 Speaker 06: is the master plan, which is

02:36:29 Speaker 06: developed in concert with all of

02:36:31 Speaker 06: our municipalities and the. scope is

02:36:32 Speaker 06: only priority one and two. We

02:36:35 Speaker 06: have guiding principles throughout the document

02:36:37 Speaker 06: that talk about that mutual respect

02:36:38 Speaker 06: and trust, being able to work

02:36:39 Speaker 06: together in good faith, knowing that

02:36:41 Speaker 06: there's a common understanding of those

02:36:42 Speaker 06: desired outcomes at the end of

02:36:43 Speaker 06: the day. So we're not coming

02:36:46 Speaker 06: in with different expectations of what

02:36:48 Speaker 06: it is that we're expecting to

02:36:51 Speaker 06: do, and having the transparency and

02:36:53 Speaker 06: accountability, knowing that we're going to

02:36:55 Speaker 06: be open and clear in our

02:36:58 Speaker 06: communication, but also know that we

02:36:59 Speaker 06: can trust that we're maintaining confidentiality

02:37:00 Speaker 06: when we need to. Some When

02:37:01 Speaker 06: we need to, sometimes it comes

02:37:03 Speaker 06: from the ground that we know

02:37:05 Speaker 06: we cannot say a word,

02:37:08 Speaker 06: and sometimes it comes from the

02:37:10 Speaker 06: county. But having that agreed to,

02:37:13 Speaker 06: collaboration and coordination, looking at activities

02:37:15 Speaker 06: and decisions that reflect the mutual

02:37:16 Speaker 06: commitment of benefit right across gray,

02:37:17 Speaker 06: and really the evidence-based decision making

02:37:19 Speaker 06: has been key. That is something

02:37:21 Speaker 06: that comes up over and over

02:37:21 Speaker 06: again, which is what you have

02:37:23 Speaker 06: seen through those shared tools, templates,

02:37:23 Speaker 06: and the data sharing platform that

02:37:25 Speaker 06: we now have together. I won't

02:37:26 Speaker 06: spend any time going through the

02:37:28 Speaker 06: rationale, but. looking specifically at the

02:37:29 Speaker 06: rules. So, Grey County, we are

02:37:31 Speaker 06: specifically looking to position the region

02:37:34 Speaker 06: for long-term growth and sustainability. Looking

02:37:36 Speaker 06: at systems mapping as Grey County

02:37:39 Speaker 06: as a whole, but paying really

02:37:40 Speaker 06: close attention to local, provincial, national,

02:37:42 Speaker 06: and global trends. And then we're

02:37:43 Speaker 06: proposing relevant projects to our municipal

02:37:45 Speaker 06: partners for consideration. So this isn't

02:37:48 Speaker 06: coming to you to say we

02:37:50 Speaker 06: need you to do X, Y,

02:37:52 Speaker 06: and Z. It is we see

02:37:55 Speaker 06: this as an opportunity. What do

02:37:58 Speaker 06: you think? Do you want to

02:38:00 Speaker 06: look at it? Do you want

02:38:02 Speaker 06: to pause? Do you want to

02:38:03 Speaker 06: just not think about it at

02:38:05 Speaker 06: all? Because we're just not there.

02:38:07 Speaker 06: That's that role. Then continuing our

02:38:09 Speaker 06: role to develop the tools and

02:38:11 Speaker 06: templates, including the shared data platform

02:38:13 Speaker 06: used by municipalities and partners, we

02:38:13 Speaker 06: will lead the regional data collection

02:38:16 Speaker 06: and analysis, but also support local

02:38:18 Speaker 06: data analysis. Leading investment attraction being

02:38:20 Speaker 06: the first point of contact with

02:38:24 Speaker 06: Invest Ontario, so that we can

02:38:25 Speaker 06: facilitate the site selectors and maintain

02:38:27 Speaker 06: an inventory. of marketable investment-ready sites.

02:38:29 Speaker 06: We will do that with you,

02:38:32 Speaker 06: but it's one point of contact

02:38:34 Speaker 06: with the province to start. Leading

02:38:36 Speaker 06: investment attraction marketing, including website and

02:38:38 Speaker 06: brand, bringing all of our municipalities

02:38:40 Speaker 06: together every quarter, just as we

02:38:42 Speaker 06: do with our economic development

02:38:45 Speaker 06: roundtables. But we're also going to

02:38:47 Speaker 06: start professional development and training opportunities.

02:38:48 Speaker 06: We introduced it this year. We've

02:38:49 Speaker 06: seen a lot of success with

02:38:51 Speaker 06: that, and we want to continue

02:38:52 Speaker 06: so that we're all getting the

02:38:54 Speaker 06: same training as we go. The

02:38:56 Speaker 06: role of our member municipalities. is

02:38:59 Speaker 06: to determine the local vision, clear

02:39:00 Speaker 06: determination of go/no go investments, and

02:39:03 Speaker 06: any preferred location for employment

02:39:06 Speaker 06: lands. So again, this is your

02:39:08 Speaker 06: role. This is what we are

02:39:10 Speaker 06: asking you to do, so that

02:39:12 Speaker 06: we are not deciding for you

02:39:13 Speaker 06: or telling you what to do.

02:39:14 Speaker 06: You're telling us what to do

02:39:16 Speaker 06: and what you want. Leading community

02:39:17 Speaker 06: economic development efforts, including determination of

02:39:18 Speaker 06: your individual and local priorities, all

02:39:20 Speaker 06: business retention and expansion activities, such

02:39:22 Speaker 06: as building relationships. and knowledge with

02:39:24 Speaker 06: businesses and landowners who are on

02:39:25 Speaker 06: the ground, and sharing relevant data

02:39:27 Speaker 06: with the county. We're not staffed

02:39:28 Speaker 06: to be able to do that

02:39:30 Speaker 06: work. As much as I would

02:39:33 Speaker 06: love to have staff on the

02:39:35 Speaker 06: ground in every one of your

02:39:36 Speaker 06: communities every day, I just can't

02:39:37 Speaker 06: do that with the resources that

02:39:39 Speaker 06: we have here. So that's something

02:39:42 Speaker 06: that we look to our municipalities

02:39:45 Speaker 06: to be building those relationships and

02:39:46 Speaker 06: sharing the information back, identifying highest

02:39:48 Speaker 06: and best value of land and

02:39:49 Speaker 06: building inventory, rezoning, servicing any of

02:39:52 Speaker 06: that into a shared template that

02:39:52 Speaker 06: we will develop as the county,

02:39:54 Speaker 06: and then to designate a point

02:39:56 Speaker 06: person for economic development coordination, and

02:39:57 Speaker 06: our shared commitment to one another

02:40:00 Speaker 06: is that we're prioritizing strategic, long-term

02:40:01 Speaker 06: thinking everywhere we can, pursuing joint

02:40:03 Speaker 06: initiatives where we can to support

02:40:04 Speaker 06: investment readiness, developing our economic development,

02:40:06 Speaker 06: tourism, and culture master plan every

02:40:08 Speaker 06: five years together. So we've already

02:40:09 Speaker 06: done that once together, continuing that

02:40:11 Speaker 06: so that all of our voices

02:40:13 Speaker 06: are on those documents right up

02:40:14 Speaker 06: to the very end. Our municipality

02:40:16 Speaker 06: strategies as well, because we can.

02:40:18 Speaker 06: Strategies as well, because we don't

02:40:20 Speaker 06: want conflict. They need to be

02:40:21 Speaker 06: able to speak to one another,

02:40:23 Speaker 06: consistently using those shared data platforms,

02:40:25 Speaker 06: tools, and resources that we've developed.

02:40:26 Speaker 06: Participating in our leadership series, valuing

02:40:27 Speaker 06: and respecting valuing the relationships that

02:40:29 Speaker 06: each party has built, because we

02:40:31 Speaker 06: know that takes time and effort,

02:40:32 Speaker 06: and ensuring consistency in messaging. Being

02:40:34 Speaker 06: a champion for ourselves and our

02:40:35 Speaker 06: neighbors, and then collaborating on funding

02:40:36 Speaker 06: applications where possible, and working towards

02:40:38 Speaker 06: consistency across planning and development policies,

02:40:39 Speaker 06: templates, and support. Policies, templates, and

02:40:40 Speaker 06: supports, and sharing our success, whether

02:40:42 Speaker 06: it's through acknowledgments or shared platforms.

02:40:46 Speaker 06: The project-specific work plans we already

02:40:48 Speaker 06: spoke about, and they're attached here

02:40:52 Speaker 06: at the end, and I'll just

02:40:54 Speaker 06: flip to that in a moment.

02:40:55 Speaker 06: But in terms of decision making

02:40:58 Speaker 29: in government, that our governance—the very

02:41:00 Speaker 29: first point—each party will always maintain

02:41:01 Speaker 29: their autonomy and the authority to

02:41:02 Speaker 29: improve any and all investment-ready projects

02:41:04 Speaker 29: lives with the member municipality. In

02:41:06 Speaker 29: terms of financial arrangements, staff resources

02:41:08 Speaker 29: they'll be assigned by each party

02:41:09 Speaker 29: through annual. work plan and allocation,

02:41:11 Speaker 29: just as they already are. Any

02:41:13 Speaker 29: joint initiatives that we can cost

02:41:15 Speaker 29: share on a project by project

02:41:16 Speaker 29: basis, we definitely want to look

02:41:19 Speaker 29: at. The example in here is

02:41:21 Speaker 29: Environics and the shared data that

02:41:25 Speaker 29: we have. But knowing that every

02:41:29 Speaker 29: party is responsible for its own

02:41:32 Speaker 29: costs, unless otherwise agreed, and all

02:41:34 Speaker 29: of those at any point will

02:41:36 Speaker 29: always come through our budget cycles

02:41:37 Speaker 56: and through council direction. So there

02:41:40 Speaker 56: should be no surprises along the

02:41:42 Speaker 56: way. It's recommended that the timelines

02:41:44 Speaker 56: and the term goes along with

02:41:45 Speaker 56: the master plan. So in this

02:41:47 Speaker 56: case, it would end. December thirty

02:41:49 Speaker 56: first of twenty twenty eight, and

02:41:51 Speaker 56: then every five years after, we

02:41:55 Speaker 56: will review with your municipalities every

02:41:57 Speaker 56: single year to make sure that

02:41:59 Speaker 56: this is still a relevant document.

02:42:00 Speaker 56: If there's updates needed, we will

02:42:03 Speaker 56: come back to council with that

02:42:04 Speaker 56: direction. And at the end of

02:42:05 Speaker 56: the day, it's non-binding. It's an

02:42:10 Speaker 56: agreement to work together and to

02:42:13 Speaker 56: collaborate in what we're already doing,

02:42:15 Speaker 56: but now it's on paper. And

02:42:17 Speaker 56: then the very last is that

02:42:21 Speaker 56: work plan, as I mentioned. So

02:42:24 Speaker 56: this is where we can propose

02:42:25 Speaker 56: projects back and forth. that are

02:42:27 Speaker 57: very specific in nature determine if

02:42:29 Speaker 57: these are confidential projects that we

02:42:31 Speaker 57: just cannot talk about publicly, or

02:42:34 Speaker 57: if they're not. And then, who's

02:42:35 Speaker 57: doing what? What is the role?

02:42:37 Speaker 57: What's the timeline expectation? And at

02:42:40 Speaker 57: any point, if we start something,

02:42:42 Speaker 57: any deposit, we can do so,

02:42:45 Speaker 57: or we can go right through

02:42:47 Speaker 57: the end. So that is the

02:42:49 Speaker 57: a lot of information to

02:42:52 Speaker 57: give to you. It's been a

02:42:53 Speaker 57: lot of work, and I really

02:42:56 Speaker 57: do want to thank all of

02:42:57 Speaker 57: your CIOs and your economic development

02:43:00 Speaker 57: staff. As you have seen, we've

02:43:01 Speaker 57: been talking about this since 2023,

02:43:03 Speaker 57: and we've. done a lot of

02:43:06 Speaker 57: work on it since May of

02:43:09 Speaker 57: this year. And I really appreciate,

02:43:11 Speaker 57: and it's exciting to see that

02:43:13 Speaker 57: as staff, we're all on the

02:43:14 Speaker 57: same page, and hoping that we

02:43:16 Speaker 57: can work together with you as

02:43:20 Speaker 57: well. Thank you, Director Myers, and

02:43:21 Speaker 57: just like the previous topic, one

02:43:23 Speaker 57: one report can't fully illustrate the

02:43:24 Speaker 57: kind of hours that went into

02:43:26 Speaker 57: all the work with staff bringing

02:43:28 Speaker 06: it to this fruition, like this,

02:43:29 Speaker 06: and and the way in which

02:43:31 Speaker 06: you work with each and every

02:43:34 Speaker 06: one of the nine municipalities. Every

02:43:35 Speaker 06: one of the nine municipality staff

02:43:37 Speaker 06: and their representation as well, both

02:43:38 Speaker 06: the CAOs and the economic development

02:43:39 Speaker 06: officers. So it truly is something

02:43:41 Speaker 06: that is made in gray, as

02:43:43 Speaker 06: you said, and both the memorandum

02:43:44 Speaker 06: of understanding, but also the work

02:43:46 Speaker 06: plan, and how unique and creative

02:43:47 Speaker 06: that will be for each and

02:43:48 Speaker 06: every municipality. So, with that, we

02:43:49 Speaker 06: have a question from the deputy

02:43:50 Speaker 06: warden. Thank you, Madam Warden, and

02:43:52 Speaker 06: we are stronger together. And this

02:43:53 Speaker 06: really. emphasizes that. And I thank

02:43:56 Speaker 06: you, Savannah, for your passion for

02:43:58 Speaker 06: this project. I think the only

02:44:00 Speaker 06: one that could provide it any

02:44:01 Speaker 06: faster, any better, would be Roger.

02:44:08 Speaker 06: Although half of us, you know,

02:44:10 Speaker 06: it would go over the top

02:44:11 Speaker 06: of most of us at speed

02:44:14 Speaker 06: he goes. But thank you so

02:44:16 Speaker 20: much for this. It really is.

02:44:17 Speaker 20: I know my EDO or our

02:44:19 Speaker 20: EDO really appreciates the relationship she

02:44:20 Speaker 20: has with you and your staff.

02:44:22 Speaker 20: And I think this is a.

02:44:23 Speaker 20: really good step forward, and we'll

02:44:26 Speaker 20: so we'll see a lot of

02:44:27 Speaker 20: good come out of it. So

02:46:43 Speaker 20: again, thank you very much. Okay,

03:00:01 Speaker 20: thank you. We'll go to Councillor

03:09:03 Speaker 20: Kibany. Thank you, Warden Matrasovs, and

03:14:45 Speaker 20: I just wanted to extend my

03:18:29 Speaker 20: congratulations to Savannah. This is really,

03:19:01 Speaker 20: really exciting work, and recognizing that

03:23:55 Speaker 20: when we first Councillor Body and

03:23:57 Speaker 20: I talked about the Shared Services

03:23:59 Speaker 20: Committee, and Councillor Body brought forward

03:24:00 Speaker 20: that motion. It was one of

03:24:03 Speaker 20: the original thoughts was economic development

03:24:05 Speaker 01: and how could we more closely

03:24:08 Speaker 01: work together? And here, Savannah's was

03:24:10 Speaker 58: way way ahead of us and

03:24:11 Speaker 01: already had this this work underway.

03:24:18 Speaker 29: And I think of our own

03:24:19 Speaker 29: Gray County PDAC committee and and

03:24:23 Speaker 29: the support that will be provided

03:24:25 Speaker 29: from that, but also from our

03:24:27 Speaker 29: own economic development advisory committees within

03:24:28 Speaker 29: their own municipalities. I think this

03:24:30 Speaker 29: you've spoken to so many points

03:24:34 Speaker 29: that come. up in our own

03:24:35 Speaker 29: conversations at those committee levels, and

03:24:37 Speaker 29: I'm thinking about how pleased those

03:24:39 Speaker 29: individuals will be, and and how

03:24:41 Speaker 29: they can can contribute to the

03:24:42 Speaker 29: collective effort of the of the

03:24:46 Speaker 29: shared goals going forward, Savannah. So

03:24:47 Speaker 29: I just thought I might ask

03:24:58 Speaker 29: you to comment on that about

03:25:00 Speaker 29: how our own local advisory committees

03:25:01 Speaker 29: can support what you're doing. Thank

03:25:03 Speaker 29: you, and through you, Warden, that

03:25:06 Speaker 29: is a great question. And as

03:25:08 Speaker 29: you know from this recommendation, this

03:25:10 Speaker 29: will be coming. to your local

03:25:11 Speaker 29: councils, and I think it would

03:25:12 Speaker 29: be a great opportunity to have

03:25:16 Speaker 59: a conversation with your committee, and

03:25:17 Speaker 59: then aligning the work plans that

03:25:18 Speaker 59: we have and the priorities and

03:25:20 Speaker 59: the timelines. And that may be

03:25:22 Speaker 59: the committee that we want to

03:25:25 Speaker 59: work together to figure out what

03:25:27 Speaker 59: are these project-specific work plans looking

03:25:29 Speaker 59: like to see what roles there

03:25:31 Speaker 59: may be. So I think having

03:25:34 Speaker 59: that conversation at the committee as

03:25:39 Speaker 59: well as council would be excellent,

03:25:42 Speaker 59: and we are happy to come

03:25:44 Speaker 59: then to your committee a couple

03:25:46 Speaker 59: of times, and then it's

03:25:49 Speaker 59: always a treat to be

03:25:52 Speaker 59: able to have the conversation and

03:25:55 Speaker 59: really. understand that local perspective, but

03:25:56 Speaker 59: getting to dive in and have

03:25:58 Speaker 59: everybody from your committees locally recommend

03:26:02 Speaker 59: to your councils locally as well

03:26:04 Speaker 59: would be wonderful. Okay, see nothing

03:26:06 Speaker 59: online, nothing here left in the

03:26:08 Speaker 59: chamber. I'll call the question. Then

03:26:10 Speaker 59: all those in favor. That motion

03:26:11 Speaker 59: is carried. Okay, so thank you

03:26:17 Speaker 59: very much for that. So we

03:26:18 Speaker 59: are going to take a break

03:26:20 Speaker 59: to lunch now, Madam Clerk. If

03:26:22 Speaker 59: we come back at quarter after

03:26:24 Speaker 59: one, would that be? suitable? Quarter

03:26:26 Speaker 59: after one, we will reconvene and

03:26:30 Speaker 59: conclude with the items that are

03:26:33 Speaker 59: left on the agenda. Thank you.

03:26:37 Speaker 59: Okay. It is cool. It is

03:26:40 Speaker 59: cool. Yes. Yes. Okay. welcome back,

03:26:42 Speaker 59: committee. The whole members we are

03:26:44 Speaker 59: present. We have around our table,

03:26:47 Speaker 59: and we have people logging back

03:26:49 Speaker 59: on virtually as well. And we

03:26:52 Speaker 59: have two items remaining that will

03:26:55 Speaker 59: require some discussion. So the first

03:26:57 Speaker 59: one is we're going to go

03:26:59 Speaker 59: back to item seven C. Back

03:27:02 Speaker 59: to item 7C, and it is

03:27:04 Speaker 59: recommended that report PDR CW 7125

03:27:06 Speaker 59: regarding a status update on the

03:27:08 Speaker 59: county's growth management strategy be received

03:27:11 Speaker 59: for information, and that the final

03:27:12 Speaker 59: draft of the growth management strategy

03:27:15 Speaker 59: be prepared early in 2026 for

03:27:16 Speaker 59: council's consideration. And with that, I

03:27:18 Speaker 59: would like to ask for a

03:27:19 Speaker 59: mover and a seconder. Okay, we've

03:27:23 Speaker 59: got a move by the deputy

03:27:26 Speaker 59: Morden, seconded by Councillor Kevany. It's

03:27:28 Speaker 59: now on the floor for discussion,

03:27:29 Speaker 59: and welcome. Senior Policy Planner Bockton.

03:27:31 Speaker 59: You're going to be starting us

03:27:33 Speaker 59: off. Okay, excellent. Welcome. Wonderful. Well,

03:27:35 Speaker 59: thank you very much. Really glad

03:27:37 Speaker 59: to be here to have a

03:27:40 Speaker 59: conversation regarding our growth management plan

03:27:42 Speaker 59: update. So it's it's a hefty

03:27:44 Speaker 59: slide deck. We'll try to move

03:27:46 Speaker 59: through that fairly quickly. I am

03:27:48 Speaker 59: aware that this was included in

03:27:51 Speaker 59: the package as well with the

03:27:53 Speaker 59: report. so certainly we we can

03:27:56 Speaker 59: have further discussion after as well.

03:27:59 Speaker 59: If you've had a chance to

03:28:01 Speaker 59: look over, I will further note

03:28:03 Speaker 59: that we will have Patrick Barbieri

03:28:06 Speaker 59: from Hemerson online as well. So,

03:28:08 Speaker 59: should we get to those questions

03:28:10 Speaker 59: and need to call a friend

03:28:12 Speaker 59: for some some assistance, that that

03:28:14 Speaker 59: will be an option as well.

03:28:17 Speaker 59: So, we'll just dive right in.

03:28:19 Speaker 59: Okay, so focus today. We'll do

03:28:20 Speaker 59: a bit of a recap on

03:28:22 Speaker 59: the countywide forecasting. This was shared

03:28:25 Speaker 59: through the Economic Development Planning and

03:28:28 Speaker 59: Economic Development Committee earlier. Those countywide

03:28:29 Speaker 59: forecasts in draft. So we'll do

03:28:31 Speaker 59: that recap. We'll look a little

03:28:33 Speaker 59: bit at the local forecasts to

03:28:35 Speaker 59: 2051 for population, households, and housing,

03:28:36 Speaker 59: and employment. We'll look a bit

03:28:38 Speaker 59: at that employment and residential land

03:28:40 Speaker 59: need piece. An assessment is part

03:28:42 Speaker 59: of the process, and then we'll

03:28:46 Speaker 59: talk a bit about those next

03:28:47 Speaker 59: steps that would arise from the

03:28:51 Speaker 59: process. Okay, so for this slide

03:28:52 Speaker 59: here, I just want to orient

03:28:53 Speaker 59: everybody to what we're looking at.

03:28:56 Speaker 59: So in the green bars, we're

03:28:58 Speaker 59: looking at the total county population

03:28:59 Speaker 59: over time. The x-axis here is

03:29:01 Speaker 59: is years, so looking backwards at

03:29:03 Speaker 59: the last forecast period, and then

03:29:04 Speaker 59: ahead to the future as well.

03:29:07 Speaker 59: in the white, so we've got

03:29:09 Speaker 59: a line in the the left

03:29:11 Speaker 59: hand side there, that represents the

03:29:14 Speaker 59: average annual growth over that historic

03:29:16 Speaker 59: period. Whereas the red line identifies

03:29:19 Speaker 59: the average forecasted growth over the

03:29:21 Speaker 59: coming horizon, and the gold line,

03:29:22 Speaker 59: which is doing a lot there,

03:29:23 Speaker 59: that one actually represents the growth

03:29:33 Speaker 59: of the population within each of

03:29:34 Speaker 59: those years. So as opposed to

03:29:39 Speaker 59: the total. So looking at that

03:29:40 Speaker 59: gold line. there has certainly been

03:29:41 Speaker 59: a lot of rapid growth ahead

03:29:45 Speaker 59: of, through, and coming out of

03:29:47 Speaker 59: the pandemic. This is a pattern

03:29:49 Speaker 59: actually that has been seen across

03:29:52 Speaker 59: the province, and it represents the

03:29:56 Speaker 59: highest growth in Grey County for

03:29:59 Speaker 59: decades prior. This was largely driven

03:30:02 Speaker 59: by non-permanent residents and immigration, with

03:30:04 Speaker 59: spillover from larger centres to areas

03:30:06 Speaker 59: like ours here in Grey. And

03:30:08 Speaker 59: growth has been accelerated in some

03:30:10 Speaker 59: areas, not just due to growth

03:30:13 Speaker 59: in terms of home for. workers,

03:30:15 Speaker 59: but also seasonal tourism, retirement, and

03:30:18 Speaker 59: remote work opportunities too. As we

03:30:20 Speaker 59: saw emerging through the pandemic, parts

03:30:23 Speaker 59: of Gray are also part of

03:30:24 Speaker 59: the catchment area for longer commutes

03:30:26 Speaker 59: to the larger city centers for

03:30:28 Speaker 59: affordable pricing. So we're within kind

03:30:30 Speaker 59: of that distance for drive to

03:30:34 Speaker 59: qualify. Kind of approaches, but what

03:30:35 Speaker 59: our consultants are advising us is

03:30:38 Speaker 59: that that period of very high

03:30:38 Speaker 59: growth is over for for the.

03:30:39 Speaker 59: time being, immigration has been reduced.

03:30:42 Speaker 59: Temporary student caps have been placed.

03:30:43 Speaker 59: There is some economic uncertainty, of

03:30:45 Speaker 59: course, and so those key ingredients

03:30:48 Speaker 59: for that very high sustained growth

03:30:49 Speaker 59: aren't aren't quite there as they

03:30:51 Speaker 59: were in the past. And so

03:30:54 Speaker 59: that has been considered as we

03:30:57 Speaker 59: look ahead to those future expectations.

03:30:59 Speaker 59: What we expect this will mean

03:30:59 Speaker 59: is a little slower growth than

03:31:02 Speaker 59: the most recent peaks in the

03:31:04 Speaker 59: coming years, and we have

03:31:06 Speaker 59: seen kind of a roll. back

03:31:08 Speaker 59: with the Ministry of Finance projections

03:31:09 Speaker 59: as well over as they've been

03:31:13 Speaker 59: issued over the past eighteen months

03:31:14 Speaker 59: and more recently this past year,

03:31:16 Speaker 59: which indicates that they're understanding that

03:31:19 Speaker 59: slow back as well. So the

03:31:21 Speaker 59: growth ahead is higher than we've

03:31:23 Speaker 59: experienced in a sustained way. So

03:31:26 Speaker 59: the average you can see there,

03:31:29 Speaker 59: the red line is is higher

03:31:30 Speaker 59: than that historic period on average.

03:31:32 Speaker 59: But we do anticipate, and I'll

03:31:34 Speaker 59: just bring your attention to the

03:31:36 Speaker 59: far right of that graph, where

03:31:41 Speaker 59: we see kind of that growth

03:31:44 Speaker 59: declining a little bit towards the

03:31:46 Speaker 59: end of the period, with respect

03:31:48 Speaker 59: to the boomer cohort. So in

03:31:50 Speaker 59: twenty fifty one, the baby boomers

03:31:53 Speaker 59: as a cohort hit life expectancy,

03:31:55 Speaker 59: and so the expectation is

03:31:58 Speaker 59: that the the death rate or

03:32:00 Speaker 59: or I guess population decline attributed

03:32:02 Speaker 59: to that would act as a

03:32:05 Speaker 59: bit of a drag on growth

03:32:07 Speaker 59: in the latter period of this

03:32:09 Speaker 59: growth horizons. Okay, easy for me

03:32:11 Speaker 59: to say, right? Yeah. Okay. So

03:32:13 Speaker 59: I think we wanted to talk

03:32:17 Speaker 59: a little bit and offer a

03:32:20 Speaker 59: recap as well around employment. So

03:32:22 Speaker 59: here we are seeing an expectation

03:32:25 Speaker 59: through the growth management plan 2025

03:32:28 Speaker 59: for a higher degree of employment

03:32:29 Speaker 59: growth over this period versus what

03:32:31 Speaker 59: was anticipated through the 2021 growth

03:32:33 Speaker 59: management exercise. The assumption is, of

03:32:36 Speaker 59: course, that certain types of employment

03:32:37 Speaker 59: are driven largely by the population

03:32:40 Speaker 59: increase. So as you grow, certain

03:32:42 Speaker 59: types of population, like retail and

03:32:43 Speaker 59: service and institutional needs, grow as

03:32:45 Speaker 59: well. But we have here also

03:32:46 Speaker 59: assumed additional employment land employment in

03:32:49 Speaker 59: the future, and that reflects the

03:32:50 Speaker 59: need for economic diversification as we

03:32:52 Speaker 59: grow, but also the initiatives that

03:32:53 Speaker 59: are being led by the county

03:32:54 Speaker 59: and member municipalities. The municipalities, and

03:32:57 Speaker 59: Helena had spoken to you a

03:33:00 Speaker 59: little bit this morning as well.

03:33:02 Speaker 59: Really looking at trying to do

03:33:04 Speaker 59: a big job, a good job

03:33:06 Speaker 59: with those employment lands. And what

03:33:07 Speaker 59: I would say, you know, I

03:33:09 Speaker 59: think we are seeing some of

03:33:10 Speaker 59: that that work come online. So

03:33:12 Speaker 59: I know Oland, for example, is

03:33:17 Speaker 59: working through some policy revisions with

03:33:18 Speaker 59: their employment lands right now. And

03:33:20 Speaker 59: we've seen Mayfair take a big

03:33:20 Speaker 59: swing with some acquisition of employment

03:33:22 Speaker 59: lands. So certainly those types of

03:33:27 Speaker 59: actions will be supporting. Looking at

03:33:30 Speaker 59: the current data, we are well

03:33:32 Speaker 59: ahead of where we thought we

03:33:37 Speaker 59: might be in 2021 for employment

03:33:39 Speaker 59: growth. We have had fairly robust

03:33:42 Speaker 59: on residential sector development, already reflected

03:33:44 Speaker 59: in the recent current data too.

03:33:47 Speaker 59: And so, this growth forecast is

03:33:49 Speaker 59: considered to be ambitious but achievable.

03:33:52 Speaker 59: Okay, and there is quite a

03:33:55 Speaker 59: value to having a robust employment

03:33:56 Speaker 59: outlook for the county. The

03:34:00 Speaker 59: consultant had noted for us that

03:34:02 Speaker 59: the activity rate has been declining

03:34:05 Speaker 59: in each of the census periods.

03:34:08 Speaker 59: to participation in in that employment,

03:34:09 Speaker 59: and so the idea is, if

03:34:10 Speaker 59: we are growing that employment, perhaps

03:34:13 Speaker 59: we can work to stabilize

03:34:15 Speaker 59: that decline in participation rate or

03:34:17 Speaker 59: reverse with our efforts. Okay, so

03:34:18 Speaker 59: for this one here, again, just

03:34:21 Speaker 59: recap. So bottom x-axis, we have

03:34:29 Speaker 59: different periods of time, and then

03:34:30 Speaker 59: within each of those periods of

03:34:32 Speaker 59: time, we can see the various

03:34:34 Speaker 59: contributions to population growth, and so

03:34:37 Speaker 59: the red in those bars is

03:34:39 Speaker 59: representing interprovincial migration. So you can

03:34:41 Speaker 59: see certainly through the pandemic period

03:34:43 Speaker 59: that's a very big contribution to

03:34:44 Speaker 59: to that growth over that period

03:34:46 Speaker 59: of time. But it is expected

03:34:51 Speaker 59: that that will continue to be

03:34:55 Speaker 59: a large driver of growth that

03:34:56 Speaker 59: interprovincial migration to Grey County. It

03:34:58 Speaker 59: is tricky; those components represented by

03:35:01 Speaker 59: the red there are are complex.

03:35:03 Speaker 59: They're are are complex, because we're

03:35:04 Speaker 59: not just pulling from one city

03:35:08 Speaker 59: center or location. In that migration,

03:35:10 Speaker 59: we see growth from the GTA,

03:35:11 Speaker 59: as well as Kitchener and Waterloo,

03:35:15 Speaker 59: and then more regionally from rural

03:35:16 Speaker 59: areas to urban areas. And so

03:35:18 Speaker 59: we have tried to kind of

03:35:25 Speaker 59: capture that in the growth expectations

03:35:31 Speaker 59: and local allocations to reflect the

03:35:33 Speaker 59: fact that, based on how these

03:35:36 Speaker 59: factors show up in each community,

03:35:36 Speaker 59: the growth will be varied in

03:35:37 Speaker 59: each community as a result. The

03:35:40 Speaker 59: only other thing I would.

03:35:42 Speaker 59: say here is just with respect

03:35:44 Speaker 59: to the green component of the

03:35:47 Speaker 59: bars, and so you can see

03:35:49 Speaker 59: as we get later into that

03:35:51 Speaker 59: time period of this growth horizon,

03:35:54 Speaker 59: that natural decrease represented by green

03:35:57 Speaker 59: is increasing, and so that's what

03:36:00 Speaker 59: I mean when when we're talking

03:36:03 Speaker 59: about the way that that natural

03:36:05 Speaker 59: decline will be a drag on

03:36:07 Speaker 59: growth. We may still be seeing

03:36:08 Speaker 59: that same level of interregional growth,

03:36:10 Speaker 59: but we'll be offsetting those losses

03:36:13 Speaker 59: through attrition. Okay, so the component.

03:36:14 Speaker 59: Okay, so the components of growth

03:36:16 Speaker 59: are expected to shift somewhat over

03:36:24 Speaker 59: time. I think it's just the

03:36:26 Speaker 59: other point that I was asked

03:36:27 Speaker 59: to be sure to emphasize. Okay,

03:36:30 Speaker 59: so having recap the countywide forecast,

03:36:31 Speaker 59: we'll now move into the local

03:36:33 Speaker 59: municipal allocations element of the work.

03:36:37 Speaker 59: Okay, so this chart here compares

03:36:39 Speaker 59: the average annual population growth over

03:36:41 Speaker 59: the last twenty years, and that's

03:36:43 Speaker 59: reflected for each of the municipalities.

03:36:45 Speaker 59: The municipality up until 2021, and

03:36:48 Speaker 59: then the average annual population growth

03:36:52 Speaker 59: for the forecast period to 2051

03:36:55 Speaker 59: in gold. So you can see

03:36:57 Speaker 59: for each of the municipalities, every

03:36:59 Speaker 59: municipality is forecasted to continue growing.

03:37:02 Speaker 59: Each will grow faster than than

03:37:05 Speaker 59: the prior average population growth rate.

03:37:06 Speaker 59: Not all communities will grow at

03:37:08 Speaker 59: the same rate or in the

03:37:09 Speaker 59: same way, and some will see

03:37:11 Speaker 59: higher growth due to that interprovincial

03:37:17 Speaker 59: migration to. Interprovincial migration, together with

03:37:18 Speaker 59: their status as a regional center,

03:37:20 Speaker 59: and so that would come into

03:37:23 Speaker 59: play with respect to Owen Sound

03:37:25 Speaker 59: and Hanover. Okay, so this represents

03:37:28 Speaker 59: the allocations in terms of people

03:37:29 Speaker 59: population. So on the left of

03:37:30 Speaker 59: this screen, you can see each

03:37:33 Speaker 59: member municipality with the population growth

03:37:35 Speaker 59: that is forecasted for that municipality

03:37:37 Speaker 59: over this period of time

03:37:39 Speaker 59: to twenty fifty one, and then

03:37:41 Speaker 59: what. is represented is a share

03:37:43 Speaker 59: of county growth for each of

03:37:45 Speaker 59: those municipalities. This anticipates that the

03:37:47 Speaker 59: green would represent the 2021 census

03:37:49 Speaker 59: population, and the gold would represent

03:37:51 Speaker 59: the 2051 population if all of

03:37:54 Speaker 59: our our growth expectations come to

03:37:56 Speaker 59: fruition. And so the expectation here

03:37:57 Speaker 59: is that Blue Mountains and Oceanside

03:38:00 Speaker 59: would be the most populous municipalities

03:38:01 Speaker 59: by 2051, with a band of

03:38:02 Speaker 59: a number of municipalities kind of

03:38:05 Speaker 59: in the. thirteen to fifteen thousand

03:38:06 Speaker 59: population range, and then slightly lesser

03:38:08 Speaker 59: growth for Chatsworth, which will maintain

03:38:09 Speaker 59: largely status quo into the the

03:38:11 Speaker 59: horizon here. Okay, and so from

03:38:14 Speaker 59: those population allocations, we then go

03:38:16 Speaker 59: forward to translate those into households,

03:38:18 Speaker 59: and so laid out in the

03:38:20 Speaker 59: same way, we can see the

03:38:23 Speaker 59: chart on the left hand side

03:38:25 Speaker 59: that identifies by municipality. the anticipated

03:38:27 Speaker 59: household growth, the share of the

03:38:29 Speaker 59: household growth overall, and what I

03:38:32 Speaker 59: would say it's not always a

03:38:34 Speaker 59: direct translation. The same for each

03:38:36 Speaker 59: municipality between population and households. We

03:38:38 Speaker 59: do look at demographic age cohorts

03:38:40 Speaker 59: and headship rates to to make

03:38:43 Speaker 59: that transition into household allocations. And

03:38:45 Speaker 59: generally, the trend is the older

03:38:48 Speaker 59: the population, the higher the headship

03:38:50 Speaker 59: rate. And so we do see

03:38:51 Speaker 59: this, for example, in Orange. Sound,

03:38:53 Speaker 59: where you would see greater household

03:38:57 Speaker 59: growth for the same population due

03:38:58 Speaker 59: to the fact that there are

03:39:01 Speaker 59: more single-person households in that older

03:39:04 Speaker 59: age cohort. And then finally, for

03:39:06 Speaker 59: employment allocations, again on the left-hand

03:39:08 Speaker 59: side, we have the chart showing

03:39:11 Speaker 59: the employment growth anticipated. So this

03:39:12 Speaker 59: is in jobs, and the share

03:39:14 Speaker 59: of the overall county growth, like

03:39:15 Speaker 59: households. which largely mirror population forecasts,

03:39:16 Speaker 59: there will be some aspects of

03:39:18 Speaker 59: employment that mirror the population growth

03:39:20 Speaker 59: too. So those general community employment

03:39:22 Speaker 59: type of roles, service, retail, healthcare,

03:39:25 Speaker 59: local government, etc. But I think

03:39:27 Speaker 59: this also does include that employment

03:39:29 Speaker 59: growth, employment, and so the expectation

03:39:32 Speaker 59: is that those areas that do

03:39:34 Speaker 59: have a supply of employment lands

03:39:36 Speaker 59: could potentially accommodate an outsized share

03:39:37 Speaker 59: of employment based on the available.

03:39:39 Speaker 59: Based on the availability of land

03:39:42 Speaker 59: that is in those locations, and

03:39:43 Speaker 59: so I think Owen Sound and

03:39:45 Speaker 59: Hanover would both be represented in

03:39:47 Speaker 59: that group as well. Okay, so

03:39:50 Speaker 59: I just will have a little

03:39:53 Speaker 59: interlude here to talk about the

03:39:55 Speaker 59: projection methodology guidance that is in

03:39:58 Speaker 59: process. I guess for an update

03:40:00 Speaker 59: with the province, I have some

03:40:03 Speaker 59: notes from the consultant. I want

03:40:05 Speaker 59: to make sure to get this

03:40:10 Speaker 59: right. So I think here the

03:40:12 Speaker 59: province. has released and has been

03:40:15 Speaker 59: consulting on proposed updates to provincial

03:40:17 Speaker 59: projection methodologies and guidance materials, and

03:40:19 Speaker 59: these are to be referred to

03:40:22 Speaker 59: in preparing draft forecast evaluations. And

03:40:24 Speaker 59: we have done so; Hemson has

03:40:25 Speaker 59: done so. The guidance is still

03:40:28 Speaker 59: in a draft form by the

03:40:29 Speaker 59: province. The ERO comment period is

03:40:32 Speaker 59: now completed, but Hemson has submitted

03:40:35 Speaker 59: comments on those guidelines, so they

03:40:37 Speaker 59: are quite familiar with with what's

03:40:38 Speaker 59: proposed there. We don't know when

03:40:40 Speaker 59: those guidelines will be formalized, but

03:40:43 Speaker 59: we have adopted some. of the

03:40:45 Speaker 59: language within just to make sure

03:40:47 Speaker 59: that we're being consistent with the

03:40:49 Speaker 59: approach that is there. It's not

03:40:51 Speaker 59: actually all that different from the

03:40:53 Speaker 59: approach Huntsman has taken in past

03:40:54 Speaker 59: years; very similar. In addressing how

03:40:56 Speaker 59: growth is to be allocated, so

03:40:58 Speaker 59: taking it from that county level

03:41:01 Speaker 59: into those local allocations, the guidance

03:41:02 Speaker 59: provides a few kind of simple

03:41:05 Speaker 59: methods, and they give us two

03:41:07 Speaker 59: approaches that are shown here. So

03:41:09 Speaker 59: in that guidance, they identify a

03:41:12 Speaker 59: method A. which would be what

03:41:15 Speaker 59: an allocation would look like from

03:41:17 Speaker 59: the county population to a municipality,

03:41:18 Speaker 59: just based on the share of

03:41:20 Speaker 59: census population for the whole county.

03:41:23 Speaker 59: So, let's just say, make it

03:41:24 Speaker 59: with seven percent of the overall

03:41:26 Speaker 59: county population. We would look forward

03:41:27 Speaker 59: and look at our overall growth

03:41:29 Speaker 59: and distribute seven percent of that

03:41:32 Speaker 59: to method under that scenario. Method

03:41:33 Speaker 59: B looks at that based on

03:41:35 Speaker 59: the municipality's share of population growth.

03:41:37 Speaker 59: Share of population grow within the

03:41:39 Speaker 59: five-year, sorry, ten-year period prior for

03:41:41 Speaker 59: the county, and really we could

03:41:43 Speaker 59: narrow it on a five-year period,

03:41:45 Speaker 59: kind of defines that recent growth

03:41:47 Speaker 59: trajectory. So that's another way that

03:41:49 Speaker 59: we could look at doing that

03:41:57 Speaker 59: allocation would be just to look

03:42:01 Speaker 59: at, you know, we've grown by

03:42:04 Speaker 59: X amount of units, and we're

03:42:07 Speaker 59: going to divide that out based

03:42:09 Speaker 59: on that most recent growth trend

03:42:10 Speaker 59: that municipality. I think in discussion

03:42:12 Speaker 59: with the consultant, what we understand

03:42:14 Speaker 59: is that these proposed methods. are

03:42:16 Speaker 59: somewhat problematic on their own, because

03:42:18 Speaker 59: in no way do they account

03:42:21 Speaker 59: for how those trends might change,

03:42:22 Speaker 59: or if we have the land

03:42:24 Speaker 59: available to accommodate, or the servicing

03:42:28 Speaker 59: available to accommodate. Right, it really

03:42:30 Speaker 59: doesn't capture what's already in the

03:42:32 Speaker 59: pipeline. Those kind of things. And

03:42:34 Speaker 59: so, what I would note is

03:42:37 Speaker 59: that we have in the slides

03:42:40 Speaker 59: to come presented method A and

03:42:43 Speaker 59: B, but the guidance does provide

03:42:44 Speaker 59: us an opportunity to allocate. slightly

03:42:46 Speaker 59: outside of the method A and

03:42:48 Speaker 59: B ways, where we can provide

03:42:52 Speaker 59: justification and demonstrate why we have

03:42:54 Speaker 59: done so. Okay. The other thing,

03:42:57 Speaker 59: just regarding the guidance that we

03:42:58 Speaker 59: receive from the province, so through

03:43:00 Speaker 59: the provincial planning statement, we are

03:43:04 Speaker 59: required to use Ministry of Finance

03:43:06 Speaker 59: projections to inform our our forecasts.

03:43:07 Speaker 59: But we want to highlight, and

03:43:10 Speaker 59: the the guidance does as well,

03:43:13 Speaker 59: that projections and forecasts are slightly

03:43:15 Speaker 59: different animals. So a projection is

03:43:17 Speaker 59: really just a straight extrapolation of

03:43:19 Speaker 59: current trends forward in time, assuming

03:43:21 Speaker 59: all things equal. It's neutral and

03:43:22 Speaker 59: it doesn't consider how those changes

03:43:24 Speaker 59: might evolve over time or how

03:43:27 Speaker 59: our assumptions might change over time.

03:43:28 Speaker 59: Whereas a forecast is instead a

03:43:30 Speaker 59: best estimate to predict predict that

03:43:32 Speaker 59: future state, and that would build

03:43:34 Speaker 59: on those past trends, but would

03:43:37 Speaker 59: also consider impacts around the changing

03:43:39 Speaker 59: variables that we think we might

03:43:41 Speaker 59: see. that would contribute to that

03:43:42 Speaker 59: growth in the future. So we

03:43:44 Speaker 59: want to highlight that because I

03:43:46 Speaker 59: think certainly there was a lot

03:43:48 Speaker 59: of discussion around that using the

03:43:51 Speaker 59: MLF numbers and those projections. But

03:43:52 Speaker 59: I think it's important to note

03:43:53 Speaker 59: that that those are projections. That

03:43:55 Speaker 59: translation into a forecast isn't provided

03:44:00 Speaker 59: by the province. That that's something

03:44:01 Speaker 59: that we do. And I think

03:44:02 Speaker 59: the other piece there that I

03:44:05 Speaker 59: would just note for those other

03:44:07 Speaker 59: agencies. that are doing work with

03:44:09 Speaker 59: data for their own strategic planning,

03:44:10 Speaker 59: so hospital boards, school boards, that

03:44:11 Speaker 59: kind of thing, they are also

03:44:14 Speaker 59: using the Ministry of Finance projections.

03:44:15 Speaker 59: And so I think by us

03:44:17 Speaker 59: doing this work, we're able to

03:44:19 Speaker 59: supplement the information that will be

03:44:21 Speaker 59: available to them for those planning

03:44:27 Speaker 59: purposes. In that we are sharing

03:44:28 Speaker 59: this information, it breaks it down

03:44:29 Speaker 59: into that a local allocation, and

03:44:34 Speaker 59: then does kind of factor in

03:44:36 Speaker 59: our understanding of how those assumptions

03:44:37 Speaker 59: may change over time. Okay. So,

03:44:38 Speaker 59: residential land use assessment. So, we've

03:44:40 Speaker 59: we've looked at those anticipated local

03:44:41 Speaker 59: allocations. So, those forecasts for the

03:44:42 Speaker 59: member municipalities. The next part of

03:44:44 Speaker 59: the exercise is to look at:

03:44:46 Speaker 59: Do we have adequate land to

03:44:50 Speaker 20: accommodate that forecasted growth? And so,

03:44:52 Speaker 20: the way that we do that

03:44:54 Speaker 20: is by taking those household forecasts

03:44:56 Speaker 20: and translating them into a forecast.

03:45:00 Speaker 20: by housing type, and so we

03:45:02 Speaker 20: look at three different types of

03:45:08 Speaker 20: units for that exercise: single semis,

03:45:10 Speaker 20: rows, and apartments. And then we

03:45:16 Speaker 53: look at that unit growth and

03:45:18 Speaker 53: allocate that to different areas within

03:45:21 Speaker 53: each of those municipalities. So that

03:45:22 Speaker 53: would include an allocation to rural

03:45:24 Speaker 53: areas as rural growth, that is

03:45:25 Speaker 53: a lower component of the overall

03:45:27 Speaker 53: forecast for each of the municipalities,

03:45:29 Speaker 53: and that is largely based on.

03:45:32 Speaker 53: historic trends for how that urban-rural

03:45:35 Speaker 53: split happens in terms of choices

03:45:37 Speaker 53: by people. The intensification in urban

03:45:39 Speaker 53: settlement areas is the next piece

03:45:40 Speaker 53: that we look at and allocate

03:45:41 Speaker 59: for. And so we look at

03:45:43 Speaker 59: their using the great county intensification

03:45:45 Speaker 59: targets to determine, you know, how

03:45:47 Speaker 59: does that household, how do those

03:45:49 Speaker 59: forecasted households fit into that particular

03:45:50 Speaker 59: settlement area? And then we look

03:45:52 Speaker 59: at greenfield areas within the settlement

03:45:54 Speaker 59: areas. Field areas within the settlement

03:45:56 Speaker 59: areas, and this is largely where

03:45:59 Speaker 59: those larger would go. And so,

03:46:01 Speaker 59: we want to make sure that

03:46:02 Speaker 59: we do have sufficient land in

03:46:05 Speaker 59: our settlement areas to accommodate that

03:46:07 Speaker 59: greenfield growth. And that's a very

03:46:09 Speaker 59: important part of this exercise because

03:46:11 Speaker 59: a lot of our servicing and

03:46:15 Speaker 59: infrastructure decisions rely then on on

03:46:17 Speaker 59: those numbers as well. And so,

03:46:19 Speaker 59: for this one, when we're looking

03:46:21 Speaker 59: at those land needs, we have

03:46:23 Speaker 59: factored in all of the permit

03:46:36 Speaker 59: data until the end of twenty

03:46:39 Speaker 59: twenty four. So we are. basing

03:46:42 Speaker 59: this from a twenty twenty five

03:46:43 Speaker 59: onward forecast. So looking at the

03:46:46 Speaker 59: units that will be required in

03:46:52 Speaker 59: those settlement areas, looking at the

03:46:54 Speaker 59: land need that will go with

03:46:56 Speaker 59: that for twenty five onwards, accounting

03:46:58 Speaker 60: for what's already in process. And

03:47:00 Speaker 53: I would, the last point I

03:47:03 Speaker 53: just wanted to say there is,

03:47:05 Speaker 53: so the data gathering for this

03:47:07 Speaker 53: process has been intense. We have

03:47:10 Speaker 53: a lot of pieces that go

03:47:12 Speaker 59: into it. I just want to

03:47:13 Speaker 59: extend my thanks to the municipal

03:47:16 Speaker 59: staff. Medical staff. It's been a

03:47:18 Speaker 59: lot of back and forth, and

03:47:19 Speaker 59: a lot of data gathering and

03:47:22 Speaker 59: sharing, and so that we couldn't

03:47:24 Speaker 59: do that exercise without those efforts.

03:47:25 Speaker 59: So, really, really appreciate that. Okay,

03:47:26 Speaker 59: so I won't spend a whole

03:47:28 Speaker 59: lot of time with each of

03:47:29 Speaker 59: these slides. I I will go

03:47:30 Speaker 59: through. Sorry, I just I figured

03:47:33 Speaker 59: that that would be a logical

03:47:35 Speaker 59: pause to just make sure that

03:47:40 Speaker 59: we could catch up on any

03:47:41 Speaker 59: questions, and so I'll just put

03:47:44 Speaker 59: it out there if there are

03:47:47 Speaker 59: any. So I'll just put it

03:47:50 Speaker 59: out there. Are there any questions

03:47:51 Speaker 59: from? And if somebody could watch

03:47:52 Speaker 59: the virtual hands for me, question

03:47:55 Speaker 59: from Councillor Mack. Make meta more.

03:47:59 Speaker 59: Thanks, Liz, for the information so

03:48:02 Speaker 59: far. In just one of the

03:48:05 Speaker 59: previous slides, it had own sound

03:48:08 Speaker 59: and Hanover as primary settlement areas.

03:48:10 Speaker 59: What's the determination? Is that a

03:48:11 Speaker 59: population figure? Like when does Dundalk,

03:48:13 Speaker 59: Meaford, for example, become a primary

03:48:15 Speaker 59: settlement? area. Thanks. Thank you to

03:48:16 Speaker 61: you, Madam Warden. So, so I

03:48:20 Speaker 61: think it's regional center is is

03:48:22 Speaker 61: the reference I was making there.

03:48:23 Speaker 61: So I think primary settlement areas.

03:48:25 Speaker 61: Um, we do have a number

03:48:29 Speaker 61: of those across the county. Those

03:48:30 Speaker 61: are defined in the official plan.

03:48:33 Speaker 61: So that's your your serviced urban

03:48:35 Speaker 62: settlements are typically called primary. The

03:48:38 Speaker 62: reference that we've made is more

03:48:40 Speaker 30: to regional centers. Um, and so

03:48:42 Speaker 30: I'd reference. Stone Sound and Hanover

03:48:43 Speaker 30: in that regard. And so, I

03:48:46 Speaker 30: think it is it is to

03:48:46 Speaker 30: to do with the size and

03:48:49 Speaker 30: scale as well as the nature

03:48:52 Speaker 59: of the various uses that are

03:48:54 Speaker 59: included. So, I think I don't

03:48:56 Speaker 59: know that we've got kind of

03:48:58 Speaker 59: a formal definition that we're using,

03:48:59 Speaker 59: but I think those locations that

03:49:01 Speaker 59: are really subject of that rural

03:49:03 Speaker 59: to urban migration, I think definitely

03:49:06 Speaker 59: would qualify under that. And I

03:49:10 Speaker 59: think it's a scale consideration for

03:49:15 Speaker 59: those regional centers that we're pulling

03:49:17 Speaker 59: from with a large. From, like

03:49:18 Speaker 59: a large area, just to access

03:49:22 Speaker 59: the services that would be located

03:49:24 Speaker 59: within. So I would say Barry,

03:49:26 Speaker 59: for example, would be a regional

03:49:28 Speaker 59: center. Collingwood probably as well. Where

03:49:30 Speaker 59: are you driving when you need

03:49:33 Speaker 59: to do those? You know, access

03:49:36 Speaker 59: your healthcare, that kind of thing.

03:49:37 Speaker 59: Thanks, Liz. So, in that definition

03:49:39 Speaker 57: you just gave, I would think

03:49:41 Speaker 57: Miford would be one of those

03:49:44 Speaker 57: same areas that people would drive

03:49:47 Speaker 57: to for the services that you

03:49:50 Speaker 57: indicated. Thanks so much. You know,

03:49:52 Speaker 57: I think with this one, so

03:49:53 Speaker 57: all of those primary settlement areas

03:49:54 Speaker 57: likely have a catchment area that's

03:49:58 Speaker 57: contributing to to folks driving into

03:50:00 Speaker 57: those centers. I live in Miford.

03:50:02 Speaker 57: I live in Meadford. You know,

03:50:06 Speaker 57: I think we certainly do have

03:50:09 Speaker 57: a variety of different housing types,

03:50:11 Speaker 57: but I think it's the size

03:50:14 Speaker 57: and scale and mix of uses,

03:50:16 Speaker 57: really, that would constitute that regional

03:50:17 Speaker 57: center, pulling from the much larger

03:50:19 Speaker 57: catchment as opposed to the more

03:50:21 Speaker 57: localized regional or sort of rural

03:50:24 Speaker 59: areas around it. Thank you. I

03:50:27 Speaker 59: can look to see if I

03:50:29 Speaker 59: can get you a more formal

03:50:30 Speaker 59: definition. The consultant may have one

03:50:33 Speaker 59: kind of in the back of

03:50:35 Speaker 59: the mind they use for that

03:50:37 Speaker 59: purpose. But thank you. Okay, we'll

03:50:40 Speaker 59: go to a question online from

03:50:44 Speaker 59: Councilor Queen. Yeah, thank you, Mayor

03:50:46 Speaker 59: Warden, and yeah, a lot of

03:50:48 Speaker 59: good information there. Just on that

03:50:50 Speaker 59: information, and obviously we're gonna have

03:50:54 Speaker 59: a motion to receive that. This

03:50:56 Speaker 59: is something we ran into a

03:50:58 Speaker 59: few years back with the with

03:51:00 Speaker 59: the school in Markdale and updated

03:51:02 Speaker 59: planning information, and and they had

03:51:04 Speaker 59: old data that didn't really. reflect

03:51:07 Speaker 59: on, you know, the projection of

03:51:08 Speaker 59: of school population. So, do you

03:51:09 Speaker 59: want to briefly speak to that,

03:51:11 Speaker 59: or do they get they? Are

03:51:12 Speaker 59: they have the opportunity to be

03:51:14 Speaker 59: shared this information because for planning

03:51:16 Speaker 59: for schools and everything else, like

03:51:18 Speaker 59: we see the growth that. Well,

03:51:20 Speaker 59: the the now looking at building

03:51:21 Speaker 59: some new school or new school

03:51:22 Speaker 59: there and that. Any thoughts on

03:51:25 Speaker 59: that? How we how we share

03:51:27 Speaker 59: that? Great, thank you. and to

03:51:29 Speaker 59: you, Madam Warden. So yes, we

03:51:33 Speaker 59: have been in in conversation with

03:51:34 Speaker 59: the school boards. So the school

03:51:35 Speaker 59: boards have received the the same

03:51:37 Speaker 59: package, the slide deck that you

03:51:39 Speaker 59: have received as well. I shared

03:51:40 Speaker 59: those out last week, so that's

03:51:42 Speaker 59: gone to Bluewater District School Board

03:51:44 Speaker 59: as well as the Catholic School

03:51:46 Speaker 59: Board. We've also included their strategic

03:51:47 Speaker 59: planning consultant with Watson, who helps

03:51:48 Speaker 59: with their data. So so Josh

03:51:49 Speaker 59: Plenty has been engaged with that

03:51:50 Speaker 59: as well. So. I would know.

03:51:53 Speaker 59: Just while I'm at it, we've

03:51:54 Speaker 63: also done so with the hospital

03:51:57 Speaker 63: boards as well, so and those

03:51:58 Speaker 63: health organizations. Okay, thank you. Thank

03:51:59 Speaker 63: you. Okay, we'll go to Councillor

03:52:00 Speaker 63: Kevany. Thank you, Madam Warden, and

03:52:01 Speaker 63: Liz. I'm just curious to know

03:52:04 Speaker 63: as you're looking at the forecasting,

03:52:05 Speaker 63: if you take into account projects

03:52:07 Speaker 63: such as the TC Energy pumped

03:52:09 Speaker 63: storage, we know Meekert has. We

03:52:10 Speaker 63: know Meeker is listed currently as

03:52:13 Speaker 63: the second lowest growth. Now, should

03:52:14 Speaker 63: that project come to fruition, that

03:52:15 Speaker 63: will have a huge impact on

03:52:17 Speaker 63: on your numbers. So, I understand

03:52:19 Speaker 63: you have to be conservative, and

03:52:21 Speaker 63: the project again is not approved

03:52:24 Speaker 63: yet. So, would you wait until

03:52:25 Speaker 63: the next opportunity to revisit this

03:52:26 Speaker 63: the growth management status update to

03:52:28 Speaker 63: incorporate those numbers, or do you

03:52:31 Speaker 63: somehow keep that in the back

03:52:32 Speaker 63: of your mind as because you're

03:52:40 Speaker 63: working with numbers now? Thank you.

03:52:42 Speaker 63: I really appreciate that question, and

03:52:43 Speaker 63: for you. So I think I

03:52:45 Speaker 63: don't know that we've necessarily specifically

03:52:46 Speaker 63: worked that in in terms of

03:52:47 Speaker 63: expectations. We have tried to capture

03:52:53 Speaker 63: everything that's in the development pipeline

03:52:55 Speaker 63: in terms of residential uses that

03:52:58 Speaker 63: we're aware of. My thought is

03:53:01 Speaker 20: that perhaps that would be picked

03:53:02 Speaker 20: up. These exercises happen about every

03:53:03 Speaker 20: five years. So my thought is

03:53:05 Speaker 20: as that materialize. That materializes or

03:53:06 Speaker 20: becomes firm, and as we see,

03:53:08 Speaker 20: kind of growth expectations that might

03:53:10 Speaker 59: come along with that in terms

03:53:12 Speaker 59: of housing-related projects, I feel that

03:53:14 Speaker 59: that would get reflected, perhaps, in

03:53:16 Speaker 59: that next iteration. That said, you

03:53:20 Speaker 59: know, I know for large-scale residential

03:53:22 Speaker 59: developments, for Great Highlands, for example,

03:53:24 Speaker 59: we we have considered that there

03:53:26 Speaker 59: are some kind of plans in

03:53:28 Speaker 59: place with respect to some of

03:53:31 Speaker 59: the applications in Beaver Valley.

03:53:33 Speaker 59: that intention is reflected in the

03:53:35 Speaker 59: numbers. We picked up some of

03:53:38 Speaker 59: those proposed units, but I think

03:53:40 Speaker 59: the expectation is that really that

03:53:42 Speaker 59: wouldn't be coming online until later,

03:53:44 Speaker 59: and so we've been very cautious,

03:53:46 Speaker 59: I guess, with the degree to

03:53:50 Speaker 59: which we're leaning on that in

03:53:52 Speaker 59: in terms of the survey or

03:53:54 Speaker 59: sorry, in terms of the exercise.

03:53:57 Speaker 59: So we do have the opportunity

03:53:58 Speaker 59: to build in some of those

03:54:01 Speaker 59: through the understanding of what's in

03:54:03 Speaker 59: the pipeline, development pipeline for residential,

03:54:06 Speaker 59: but I think we would would

03:54:09 Speaker 59: like. But I think we would

03:54:11 Speaker 59: would likely need to capture that

03:54:12 Speaker 59: at the next period as it

03:54:15 Speaker 59: translates into thousands of applications. And

03:54:17 Speaker 59: I think Scott may have some

03:54:20 Speaker 59: further comments around that as well.

03:54:23 Speaker 59: Yeah, thank you, through you, Madam

03:54:26 Speaker 59: Warden. Just to build on what

03:54:27 Speaker 59: Liz has said to Councillor Cummins'

03:54:29 Speaker 59: questions, one of the processes here

03:54:32 Speaker 59: was that we did meet one

03:54:34 Speaker 59: on one with each of the

03:54:36 Speaker 59: nine member municipalities, and we tried

03:54:38 Speaker 59: to flag, as Liz said, we

03:54:39 Speaker 59: we we focused a lot on

03:54:41 Speaker 59: on what's in the immediate pipeline.

03:54:47 Speaker 59: What do we know we have

03:54:48 Speaker 59: applications for and approvals for? and

03:54:49 Speaker 59: everything else that might not be

03:54:50 Speaker 59: built yet, but we did flag

03:54:52 Speaker 59: a number of those bigger sort

03:54:54 Speaker 59: of economic drivers. Some that are

03:54:56 Speaker 59: more certain and some that are

03:54:57 Speaker 59: less certain. So the two

03:54:59 Speaker 59: that come to mind is we

03:55:03 Speaker 59: did flag the TC Energy project

03:55:05 Speaker 59: and we did flag some of

03:55:06 Speaker 59: the the major plans at the

03:55:09 Speaker 59: Bruce as well, because we know

03:55:11 Speaker 59: whether they come online in the

03:55:12 Speaker 59: short term or the longer term.

03:55:14 Speaker 59: Given that this is going to

03:55:15 Speaker 59: 2051, that they could have a

03:55:19 Speaker 59: big impact. And and so the

03:55:20 Speaker 59: you know the consultant was definitely

03:55:22 Speaker 59: taking notes there as to how.

03:55:24 Speaker 59: those exactly influenced, you know,

03:55:27 Speaker 59: Miford's numbers on either employment or

03:55:29 Speaker 59: or population. We'd need to touch

03:55:31 Speaker 59: base again with the consultant, but

03:55:34 Speaker 59: we tried to flag some of

03:55:35 Speaker 59: those bigger ecosystem things that that

03:55:37 Speaker 59: could have a major impact on

03:55:38 Speaker 59: Gray's growth as a whole and

03:55:40 Speaker 59: individual municipal municipal group as well.

03:55:42 Speaker 59: Okay, great. Well, in the interest

03:55:43 Speaker 59: of time, then we'll keep moving.

03:55:45 Speaker 59: If you come up with a

03:55:47 Speaker 59: question, then you'll still have an

03:55:50 Speaker 59: opportunity. after the next slides. Go

03:55:53 Speaker 59: ahead, please. Wonderful. Wonderful. Thank you

03:55:55 Speaker 59: very much. Okay, so I think

03:55:57 Speaker 59: so. In the second portion of

03:55:58 Speaker 59: the presentation, so I have included

03:56:01 Speaker 59: the slides as are included in

03:56:03 Speaker 59: the deck for each of the

03:56:05 Speaker 59: local allocations. I think we'll use

03:56:08 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains just as an example

03:56:14 Speaker 59: to orient ourselves to the slides.

03:56:16 Speaker 59: I have a few brief comments,

03:56:19 Speaker 59: just based on kind of the

03:56:21 Speaker 59: conversations we've had with the consultant

03:56:24 Speaker 59: and local staff. Into local staff,

03:56:26 Speaker 59: but we'll whip through those quite

03:56:27 Speaker 59: quickly. So, each municipality, there are

03:56:29 Speaker 59: two slides in the deck with

03:56:31 Speaker 59: relationship to to the allocations for

03:56:33 Speaker 59: your municipality. And so, there on

03:56:35 Speaker 59: the left hand side, we have

03:56:38 Speaker 59: just kind of snapshot data regarding

03:56:41 Speaker 59: expectations for population growth, residential unit

03:56:44 Speaker 59: growth, and that new jobs over

03:56:45 Speaker 59: that forecast horizon. And then on

03:56:47 Speaker 59: the right hand side, we have

03:56:49 Speaker 59: a graph that's showing that growth

03:56:51 Speaker 59: alongside. the growth that would be

03:56:55 Speaker 59: identified through method A and B

03:56:56 Speaker 59: in that provincial methodology, and so

03:56:58 Speaker 59: in the Blue Mountains example here,

03:57:00 Speaker 59: we can see method A, which

03:57:02 Speaker 59: again is that based on kind

03:57:04 Speaker 59: of current share of census population

03:57:05 Speaker 59: for the county, that is shown

03:57:08 Speaker 59: in green. So that would represent

03:57:11 Speaker 59: a lower growth rate than is

03:57:13 Speaker 59: being forecasted. The method B through

03:57:19 Speaker 59: the provincial methodology, again, just looking

03:57:21 Speaker 59: at the most recent growth period,

03:57:23 Speaker 59: also falls just a little bit

03:57:25 Speaker 59: below where we're expecting the growth

03:57:27 Speaker 59: to go for the municipality of

03:57:30 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains, and I think here

03:57:32 Speaker 59: really the commentary provided by the

03:57:33 Speaker 59: consultant was just all of the

03:57:35 Speaker 59: ingredients are there for continued growth

03:57:38 Speaker 59: of Blue Mountains. The land availability

03:57:41 Speaker 59: is also there as well, and

03:57:42 Speaker 59: so the expectation is that the

03:57:45 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains will capture a slightly

03:57:49 Speaker 59: higher share of the county growth

03:57:54 Speaker 59: over. this coming horizon versus prior

03:57:57 Speaker 59: horizons. Okay, um, this is how

03:58:00 Speaker 59: the residential land needs slides look,

03:58:01 Speaker 59: and again, there's one of these

03:58:03 Speaker 59: for each of the municipalities. Um,

03:58:06 Speaker 59: so you can see at the

03:58:08 Speaker 59: top, um, we've identified the unit

03:58:10 Speaker 59: demand on the left hand side

03:58:12 Speaker 59: and broken that down into that

03:58:14 Speaker 59: rural, urban intensified, intensification, and urban

03:58:15 Speaker 59: greenfield types. We made some assumptions

03:58:18 Speaker 59: regarding the share of unit types

03:58:20 Speaker 59: and how those would be distributed,

03:58:24 Speaker 59: and then. have tallied those up

03:58:29 Speaker 59: together and made a determination based

03:58:31 Speaker 59: on the density of land use

03:58:32 Speaker 59: for those unit types, how much

03:58:37 Speaker 59: land would be required to accommodate

03:58:39 Speaker 59: those that unit. And so, in

03:58:40 Speaker 59: the bottom part of that chart,

03:58:42 Speaker 59: it does show the primary settlement

03:58:44 Speaker 59: areas, the secondary settlement areas, resort

03:58:46 Speaker 59: recreation settlement areas, and then lakes

03:58:48 Speaker 59: and shorelines, and the land available

03:58:51 Speaker 59: there. And so, we've netted out

03:58:53 Speaker 59: that growth need to accommodate all

03:58:55 Speaker 59: of those new units, and at

03:58:57 Speaker 59: the bottom. we have either a

03:59:00 Speaker 59: surplus or a deficit showing for

03:59:02 Speaker 59: that greenfield land supply. So really,

03:59:05 Speaker 59: all this is doing is pulling

03:59:07 Speaker 59: all of that background data together

03:59:08 Speaker 59: into one place, so that you

03:59:11 Speaker 59: can see how those unit expectations

03:59:13 Speaker 59: are coming on for that horizon.

03:59:15 Speaker 59: That we have the land available

03:59:16 Speaker 59: to accommodate that, where that land

03:59:18 Speaker 59: is located, and then looking at

03:59:19 Speaker 59: the net outcome of what remains

03:59:21 Speaker 59: after that growth has been accommodated.

03:59:29 Speaker 59: And so, in the circumstance for

03:59:31 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains, the land supply identified

03:59:34 Speaker 59: is adequate for the growth horizon.

03:59:36 Speaker 59: So, likewise with Chatsworth. So, again,

03:59:39 Speaker 59: we've got the growth management strategy

03:59:41 Speaker 59: figures plotted on the chart there,

03:59:43 Speaker 59: together with method A and B.

03:59:44 Speaker 59: In this case, the expectation is

03:59:46 Speaker 59: that the municipality will grow, but

03:59:49 Speaker 59: that will be incremental and keeping

03:59:54 Speaker 59: with what we've seen historically and

03:59:56 Speaker 59: in the recent past as well.

04:00:00 Speaker 59: And I think here. there's certainly

04:00:02 Speaker 59: a lovely rural character. There's no

04:00:05 Speaker 59: primary fully serviced settlement. However, we

04:00:08 Speaker 59: do attract rural growth. Certainly a

04:00:10 Speaker 59: beautiful landscape, and a good level

04:00:12 Speaker 59: of on farm diversified use for

04:00:13 Speaker 59: employment activity as well. And so

04:00:15 Speaker 59: modest growth in the grand scheme

04:00:18 Speaker 59: of things. And here with that

04:00:19 Speaker 59: growth management versus method A or

04:00:22 Speaker 59: B, the draft growth management strategy

04:00:23 Speaker 59: comes a little bit lower than

04:00:25 Speaker 59: both of those other methods. I

04:00:27 Speaker 59: would identify that the It would

04:00:29 Speaker 59: identify that the current share will

04:00:30 Speaker 59: be a little bit higher than

04:00:33 Speaker 59: the future share of county growth

04:00:35 Speaker 59: and population for Chatsworth, and then

04:00:36 Speaker 59: they would have adequate land supply

04:00:38 Speaker 59: to accommodate that growth. Likewise for

04:00:40 Speaker 59: Georgian Bluffs, so same layout, and

04:00:42 Speaker 59: here as well. So main focus

04:00:43 Speaker 59: of growth being Cobble, East Linton,

04:00:45 Speaker 59: and Shallow Lake, the rural and

04:00:49 Speaker 59: shoreline areas as well. Lots of

04:00:50 Speaker 59: potential and land available. but I

04:00:51 Speaker 59: think the consultant really aimed to

04:00:54 Speaker 59: be quite realistic in terms of

04:00:57 Speaker 59: expectations here, also factoring in consideration

04:01:00 Speaker 59: regarding servicing supply or limitation. I

04:01:01 Speaker 59: guess, but it is well in

04:01:02 Speaker 59: line with recent years and represents

04:01:06 Speaker 59: ongoing city growth. And again, land

04:01:08 Speaker 59: supply is adequate. For Gray Highlands,

04:01:15 Speaker 59: same thing. Lots of recent growth

04:01:16 Speaker 59: and development interest. There are some

04:01:18 Speaker 59: large. There are some large-scale plans

04:01:19 Speaker 59: that are in phasing, and lots

04:01:20 Speaker 59: of short and medium-term growth anticipated

04:01:22 Speaker 59: for Markdale in particular. There is

04:01:24 Speaker 59: perhaps some longer-term development potential as

04:01:26 Speaker 59: well, and so again, speaking to

04:01:29 Speaker 59: those Beaver Valley potential applications. But

04:01:31 Speaker 59: I think the sense was that

04:01:32 Speaker 59: that would be quite a ways

04:01:35 Speaker 59: out, and so that has a

04:01:38 Speaker 59: limited impact on the forecast in

04:01:40 Speaker 59: this iteration. And again, land supply

04:01:44 Speaker 59: is adequate. Okay, for handover. For

04:01:47 Speaker 59: Hanover, so I think here the

04:01:50 Speaker 59: consultant has advised that there's some

04:01:53 Speaker 59: greater certainty through this forecast. This

04:01:54 Speaker 59: is premised on servicing being available,

04:01:56 Speaker 59: or rather, servicing constraints not being

04:01:58 Speaker 59: an impediment to growth over that

04:02:00 Speaker 59: horizon, and that is assumed that

04:02:02 Speaker 59: servicing would be delivered as needed

04:02:03 Speaker 59: through the horizon to support the

04:02:05 Speaker 59: growth. Here, the growth management strategy

04:02:06 Speaker 59: identifies anticipated growth higher than those

04:02:08 Speaker 59: most recent periods and trends for

04:02:09 Speaker 59: Hanover into the future. and again,

04:02:11 Speaker 59: this would represent that interprovincial growth.

04:02:14 Speaker 59: That location to the south, nearer

04:02:15 Speaker 59: to those city centers for in

04:02:18 Speaker 59: migrants, and also that function as

04:02:19 Speaker 59: a regional center to a to

04:02:23 Speaker 59: a very large rural area surrounding.

04:02:25 Speaker 59: And again, this one is

04:02:28 Speaker 59: is not the same as the

04:02:30 Speaker 59: others. Here, there is an identified

04:02:32 Speaker 59: deficit in terms of land supply.

04:02:34 Speaker 59: I think that drives quite well

04:02:38 Speaker 59: with the conversation that we had

04:02:39 Speaker 59: this morning regarding those boundary adjustments.

04:02:44 Speaker 59: For Mefford, again, fairly steady growth

04:02:45 Speaker 59: and development interest has been experienced

04:02:46 Speaker 59: here. I think some servicing constraints

04:02:49 Speaker 59: at play, but have less so

04:02:52 Speaker 59: than than we understood in the

04:02:54 Speaker 59: past. And I think this does

04:02:55 Speaker 59: bring us online for the forecast

04:02:56 Speaker 59: period a little higher, but generally

04:02:58 Speaker 59: in line with the past years

04:03:00 Speaker 59: of growth. So ongoing, steady growth

04:03:02 Speaker 59: is anticipated. Okay. And an adequate

04:03:06 Speaker 59: supply of land to accommodate that

04:03:10 Speaker 59: growth as well. Okay, and then

04:03:12 Speaker 59: Southgate, and we're almost, we're almost

04:03:13 Speaker 59: there. Um, so South Southgate, uh,

04:03:15 Speaker 59: switch my things around. So,

04:03:17 Speaker 59: um, significant plans here for growth.

04:03:19 Speaker 59: Um, and I think we've seen

04:03:22 Speaker 59: quite a bit of growth over

04:03:23 Speaker 59: this most recent period of time.

04:03:26 Speaker 59: Um, so I think we're anticipating

04:03:28 Speaker 59: that we're not going to necessarily

04:03:32 Speaker 59: sustain that very high growth into

04:03:35 Speaker 59: the future. and so therefore we're

04:03:39 Speaker 59: coming in below Method B, but

04:03:41 Speaker 59: we are a little higher than

04:03:44 Speaker 59: kind of that historic share of

04:03:45 Speaker 59: the growth of the county for

04:03:46 Speaker 59: to go forward expected. Certainly, the

04:03:50 Speaker 59: Southgate is not immune to

04:03:54 Speaker 59: the broader slowdown that's happening right

04:03:55 Speaker 59: right now in Ontario, and so

04:03:58 Speaker 59: I think the expectation is, however,

04:04:00 Speaker 59: that after the slowdown, we will

04:04:02 Speaker 59: see a pick up again in

04:04:04 Speaker 59: growth, and that is starting actually

04:04:08 Speaker 59: in some areas to to to

04:04:09 Speaker 59: go. Planning is in place for

04:04:12 Speaker 59: servicing constraints. and so nothing here

04:04:16 Speaker 59: is premised on servicing being an

04:04:17 Speaker 59: impediment. And so I think expected

04:04:20 Speaker 59: to level off a bit, but

04:04:23 Speaker 59: we will see just a little

04:04:25 Speaker 59: bit of a rebound after this

04:04:28 Speaker 59: current slowdown. Okay, and again, land

04:04:30 Speaker 59: supply is determined to be adequate

04:04:33 Speaker 59: there. Okay, and west gray to

04:04:34 Speaker 59: servicefully settlement areas is the note

04:04:38 Speaker 59: I left myself here. So I

04:04:41 Speaker 59: think what I wanted to know.

04:04:43 Speaker 59: So we do. What I

04:04:45 Speaker 59: wanted to know was so we

04:04:47 Speaker 59: do have a number of applications

04:04:48 Speaker 59: in process in Durham, and the

04:04:51 Speaker 59: growth outside of Durham New Stat

04:04:53 Speaker 59: has generally been fairly modest. The

04:04:54 Speaker 59: trajectory is very similar to the

04:04:56 Speaker 59: most recent past, so coming in

04:04:59 Speaker 59: just a little bit below what

04:05:00 Speaker 59: we would anticipate through Method B,

04:05:02 Speaker 59: that recent trend, but ongoing growth

04:05:04 Speaker 59: expected over the horizon for sure.

04:05:07 Speaker 59: Okay, and again, adequate land, okay,

04:05:10 Speaker 59: and then finally, Owen Sound. So

04:05:12 Speaker 59: here, it is identified that we

04:05:14 Speaker 59: anticipate that Owen Sound will grow

04:05:16 Speaker 59: a little higher than this most

04:05:19 Speaker 59: recent period. We certainly have seen

04:05:21 Speaker 59: lots of apartments development happening. The

04:05:23 Speaker 59: Sydenham Heights area is starting to

04:05:25 Speaker 59: get going, and there's lots of

04:05:30 Speaker 59: potential there. And I think we

04:05:32 Speaker 59: just wanted to highlight here as

04:05:34 Speaker 59: well just the work that has

04:05:36 Speaker 59: been put in by the city

04:05:39 Speaker 59: to attract that share of the

04:05:41 Speaker 59: rental market. That's been a conscious

04:05:47 Speaker 59: effort, and I think, or we

04:05:49 Speaker 59: think, there are good reasons. to

04:05:51 Speaker 59: believe that that rental market will

04:05:54 Speaker 59: continue to increase actually over time.

04:05:56 Speaker 59: We've got a significant supply of

04:05:58 Speaker 59: older adults looking at one sound,

04:06:01 Speaker 59: particularly regarding downsizing and access to

04:06:03 Speaker 59: healthcare as well, and those regional

04:06:04 Speaker 59: center amenities. And so we do

04:06:08 Speaker 59: think that demographic forces may drive

04:06:11 Speaker 59: that existing planned apartment construction, but

04:06:12 Speaker 59: perhaps additional in the future as

04:06:14 Speaker 59: well. And so being that this

04:06:16 Speaker 59: is one of those areas that

04:06:17 Speaker 59: is a little bit older, I

04:06:19 Speaker 59: think we do also anticipate that

04:06:21 Speaker 59: age drag on growth applying, you

04:06:24 Speaker 59: know, in sound towards the end

04:06:25 Speaker 59: of the horizon too. So you

04:06:27 Speaker 59: can see the the curve dips

04:06:30 Speaker 59: just a little bit towards the

04:06:33 Speaker 59: end of the horizon, but adequate

04:06:34 Speaker 59: land is identified here as well.

04:06:38 Speaker 59: Okay, and so I just really

04:06:40 Speaker 59: just in summary of of those

04:06:42 Speaker 59: land need assessment pieces, with the

04:06:43 Speaker 59: exception of Panover, all of the

04:06:45 Speaker 59: With the exception of Hanover, all

04:06:48 Speaker 59: of the municipalities are are determined

04:06:50 Speaker 59: to have sufficient lands within designated

04:06:53 Speaker 59: settlements to accommodate the growth forecast

04:06:55 Speaker 59: to twenty fifty one. Hanover does

04:06:56 Speaker 59: require an addition of land for

04:06:58 Speaker 59: this particular planning horizon, but I

04:07:00 Speaker 59: understand that we are looking long

04:07:02 Speaker 59: term strategic growth as well. Okay,

04:07:06 Speaker 59: with respect to employment allocations, so

04:07:09 Speaker 59: that was likely population. We have

04:07:11 Speaker 59: further allocated that overall county employment

04:07:13 Speaker 59: growth to. the member municipalities. Like

04:07:14 Speaker 59: I noted, we break that down

04:07:16 Speaker 59: into a couple of different types

04:07:19 Speaker 59: of employment growth. So general employment,

04:07:20 Speaker 59: so that's your population-driven community retail,

04:07:21 Speaker 59: all of your services, that kind

04:07:24 Speaker 59: of thing. Employment area employment, which

04:07:26 Speaker 59: are those employment lands for more

04:07:27 Speaker 59: so manufacturing type uses, and then

04:07:28 Speaker 59: rural employment. We can see across

04:07:31 Speaker 59: the different municipalities the nature of

04:07:33 Speaker 59: employment growth for each of which

04:07:35 Speaker 59: is different. Forecasts for each is

04:07:37 Speaker 59: different, depending on the factors driving

04:07:39 Speaker 59: that growth. And essentially, through this,

04:07:41 Speaker 59: the allocation is done a little

04:07:42 Speaker 59: bit differently. So we are essentially

04:07:45 Speaker 59: seeking to answer the question: Is

04:07:46 Speaker 59: there enough employment land to accommodate

04:07:48 Speaker 59: that employment growth in the municipality?

04:07:49 Speaker 59: Through the land need exercise, we

04:07:51 Speaker 59: are also considering that general employment,

04:07:53 Speaker 59: but that is often accommodated in

04:07:56 Speaker 59: our residential or general lands, not

04:07:58 Speaker 59: in Control or general lands, not

04:08:01 Speaker 59: employment lands. The expectation is there

04:08:04 Speaker 59: are sufficient lands to accommodate the

04:08:06 Speaker 59: forecast employment growth, notwithstanding the fact

04:08:07 Speaker 59: that both the forecast is ambitious

04:08:09 Speaker 59: based on our plans. And I

04:08:11 Speaker 59: think we just do want to

04:08:13 Speaker 59: flag as well that there are,

04:08:14 Speaker 59: of course, other factors that apply

04:08:15 Speaker 59: to whether this growth will be

04:08:19 Speaker 59: realized. Willing landowners is a really

04:08:20 Speaker 59: big one, and I think speaks

04:08:23 Speaker 59: to the goals with respect to

04:08:24 Speaker 59: municipal employment land ownership that are

04:08:27 Speaker 59: possible. Service Serviceing of lands and

04:08:29 Speaker 59: suitability and attractions. We do have

04:08:31 Speaker 59: adequate lands. Are they in the

04:08:32 Speaker 59: right places for the right opportunities?

04:08:33 Speaker 20: I think is part of the

04:08:35 Speaker 20: discussion that's ongoing. So we're okay.

04:08:37 Speaker 20: We can accommodate that. But there

04:08:38 Speaker 20: certainly would be opportunity to revisit

04:08:40 Speaker 20: and look at that right sizing

04:08:41 Speaker 20: and right location elements. Okay. And

04:08:43 Speaker 20: here, similar to the traits we've

04:08:46 Speaker 20: seen in previous slides, we've identified

04:08:47 Speaker 20: that in. We've identified that employment

04:08:49 Speaker 20: land supply, and then that employment

04:08:50 Speaker 20: land forecast for each of those

04:08:51 Speaker 20: municipalities, and those numbers are shared

04:08:53 Speaker 20: here. And then, just as a

04:08:55 Speaker 20: share of the great county pie,

04:08:56 Speaker 20: in terms of employment land allocation,

04:08:58 Speaker 20: this is how those employment growth

04:08:59 Speaker 20: allocations are distributed amongst us. And

04:09:03 Speaker 20: so, you can see those municipalities

04:09:04 Speaker 20: with that larger land supply are

04:09:06 Speaker 20: are picking up a larger share

04:09:09 Speaker 20: of that. anticipated employment growth over

04:09:13 Speaker 20: the horizon. Okay, so we made

04:09:15 Speaker 20: it through data after lunchtime can

04:09:17 Speaker 20: be a challenge. So thank you

04:09:19 Speaker 20: all for bearing with me. What

04:09:21 Speaker 20: I just wanted to say here,

04:09:23 Speaker 20: just as a means of recap,

04:09:24 Speaker 20: is so you know bringing that

04:09:26 Speaker 20: all together, we do anticipate higher

04:09:28 Speaker 20: population and housing growth all around.

04:09:29 Speaker 20: So for all of the member

04:09:31 Speaker 20: municipalities over this period, notwithstanding the

04:09:33 Speaker 20: current slowdown, we will see a

04:09:36 Speaker 20: rebound. The fundamental drivers of growth

04:09:37 Speaker 20: in grey are multifaceted, expected to

04:09:38 Speaker 20: to remain and and be in

04:09:39 Speaker 20: place for go forward. Higher employment

04:09:41 Speaker 20: growth is anticipated partly because more

04:09:43 Speaker 20: people, and partly to reflect that

04:09:45 Speaker 20: desire for development of additional land

04:09:47 Speaker 20: and opportunity to the employment purposes.

04:09:49 Speaker 20: The residential land supply is sufficient,

04:09:50 Speaker 20: except in Hanover, and employment lands

04:09:53 Speaker 20: are generally sufficient. And so, as

04:09:55 Speaker 20: I noted, that we've shared out

04:09:58 Speaker 20: this deck to the member municipalities,

04:10:00 Speaker 20: we've also shared that along to

04:10:02 Speaker 20: various. community partners in education and

04:10:04 Speaker 20: health. We have been asking for

04:10:07 Speaker 20: feedback with respect to these. These

04:10:08 Speaker 20: are draft local allocations at this

04:10:10 Speaker 20: point in time, and so ideally

04:10:11 Speaker 20: we would love to hear comments

04:10:14 Speaker 20: back prior to the holiday closure,

04:10:16 Speaker 20: wherever possible. We do have a

04:10:18 Speaker 20: number of projects both at the

04:10:20 Speaker 20: county level and local levels that

04:10:25 Speaker 20: are pending with some of this

04:10:26 Speaker 20: data as input, and so we

04:10:27 Speaker 20: do want to move through the

04:10:30 Speaker 20: last part of this process as

04:10:32 Speaker 20: quickly as possible. doing a really

04:10:33 Speaker 20: good job with it, but but

04:10:35 Speaker 20: being expeditious, and so we certainly

04:10:37 Speaker 20: would appreciate any comments that you

04:10:40 Speaker 20: may have on those drafts, and

04:10:43 Speaker 20: could set up conversations with staff

04:10:45 Speaker 20: or consultants if that's maybe needed

04:10:46 Speaker 20: to support that, and so then

04:10:48 Speaker 20: our expectation for the go forward

04:10:49 Speaker 20: would be to come back to

04:10:52 Speaker 59: kind of council it in Q

04:10:54 Speaker 59: one of next year, with a

04:10:56 Speaker 59: report from the consultant with respect

04:10:59 Speaker 59: to all of the background data.

04:11:01 Speaker 59: We only touched the surface here.

04:11:03 Speaker 59: Touch the surface here, and and

04:11:06 Speaker 59: then we would have that wholesome

04:11:07 Speaker 59: opportunity to review that report and

04:11:10 Speaker 59: the final numbers as well. So

04:11:11 Speaker 59: I'll leave it there. Again, happy

04:11:13 Speaker 59: to answer any additional questions that

04:11:17 Speaker 59: may occur. And I think we

04:11:18 Speaker 59: do have Patrick, like we online

04:11:22 Speaker 59: at this point as well. If

04:11:25 Speaker 59: we need his help too. Well,

04:11:28 Speaker 59: thank you very much for all

04:11:30 Speaker 59: that information and the examples that

04:11:32 Speaker 59: go by the municipalities. I think

04:11:35 Speaker 59: will help us translate. to what

04:11:37 Speaker 59: we know on the ground. A

04:11:41 Speaker 59: couple of questions for you, and

04:11:44 Speaker 59: I understand from reading the report

04:11:45 Speaker 59: that this is there's a certain

04:11:47 Speaker 59: formula you have to follow, and

04:11:48 Speaker 59: it's door number one or door

04:11:50 Speaker 59: number two, and you just go

04:11:52 Speaker 59: with that. But I also recognized

04:11:55 Speaker 59: in the report that you do

04:11:57 Speaker 59: tap into whatever data you can

04:11:59 Speaker 59: find: school boards, hospitals, etc. School

04:12:01 Speaker 59: boards are challenging because you can't

04:12:03 Speaker 59: predict anymore if somebody was born

04:12:04 Speaker 59: here that they're going to show

04:12:10 Speaker 59: up for school in that particular

04:12:14 Speaker 59: region five years from now. That's

04:12:15 Speaker 59: this day and age you can't.

04:12:17 Speaker 59: The the day and age you

04:12:20 Speaker 59: can't do all that, but we

04:12:21 Speaker 59: do our best. But the question

04:12:23 Speaker 59: that I have for you then

04:12:24 Speaker 59: is the the estimates of of

04:12:25 Speaker 59: the growth of the number

04:12:29 Speaker 59: of dwellings. How does that take

04:12:31 Speaker 59: into account the variability of those

04:12:35 Speaker 59: dwellings? So I I I would

04:12:38 Speaker 59: lean into your expertise as as

04:12:41 Speaker 59: planning that you would be able

04:12:44 Speaker 59: to identify density, for example, in

04:12:45 Speaker 59: various different official plans of various

04:12:46 Speaker 59: different towns. But then there's always

04:12:48 Speaker 59: a variation in that density, right?

04:12:49 Speaker 59: So, if something's being built to

04:12:51 Speaker 59: the sparsest, to the biggest homes,

04:12:53 Speaker 59: the biggest lots, as opposed to

04:12:54 Speaker 59: the smallest of the what's allowable

04:12:56 Speaker 59: in that zone, how do you

04:12:57 Speaker 59: accommodate for that? How do you

04:12:59 Speaker 59: accommodate for accounting for the number

04:13:00 Speaker 59: of dwellings that are going to

04:13:03 Speaker 59: be built but are not going

04:13:04 Speaker 59: to actually increase the population because

04:13:06 Speaker 59: it will be people that are

04:13:09 Speaker 59: using it for secondary residence? And

04:13:10 Speaker 59: then also, how do you mix

04:13:13 Speaker 59: into all that when homes are

04:13:15 Speaker 59: being sold to somebody who is

04:13:18 Speaker 59: not an employment-age individual who Age

04:13:20 Speaker 59: individual who is not, you know,

04:13:22 Speaker 59: could just be two retirees moving

04:13:25 Speaker 59: up to what looks like another

04:13:26 Speaker 59: house on the the the plate,

04:13:28 Speaker 59: and then finally the connected to

04:13:29 Speaker 59: all that. Then is how did

04:13:31 Speaker 59: you get the general educate general

04:13:33 Speaker 59: employment numbers? I can see how

04:13:35 Speaker 59: you can calculate the employment area

04:13:37 Speaker 59: because you can look to see

04:13:38 Speaker 59: where the the available employment lands,

04:13:39 Speaker 59: but that general one is that

04:13:41 Speaker 59: just simply a mathematical calculation on

04:13:43 Speaker 59: what I've just mentioned, which might

04:13:45 Speaker 59: not actually be very accurate. Thank

04:13:46 Speaker 59: you. Okay, a lot there to

04:13:54 Speaker 59: unpack, and I may I may

04:13:56 Speaker 59: call a friend on certain elements

04:13:57 Speaker 59: of that, but you know I

04:13:58 Speaker 59: think I can speak to some

04:14:01 Speaker 59: of it, and maybe we'll we'll

04:14:05 Speaker 59: take in Scott and perhaps Patrick

04:14:07 Speaker 59: as well. So I think for

04:14:09 Speaker 59: the estimated growth for the dwellings,

04:14:10 Speaker 59: so that is we're taking the

04:14:12 Speaker 51: population, we're looking at those headship

04:14:13 Speaker 51: rates and the age cohorts in

04:14:15 Speaker 51: that community to determine you know

04:14:17 Speaker 51: how many households is that population

04:14:20 Speaker 51: translating into? Then, once we have

04:14:22 Speaker 51: that understanding of households, we are

04:14:24 Speaker 51: looking at existing trends. I imagine

04:14:25 Speaker 51: there's some secret sauce in Hemson's

04:14:27 Speaker 51: formula as well that relates to

04:14:28 Speaker 51: that. But translating them into those

04:14:30 Speaker 51: three different unit types, so we've

04:14:31 Speaker 51: got singles and semis, rows and

04:14:32 Speaker 51: apartments. So, trying to kind of

04:14:35 Speaker 51: represent a few different types of

04:14:36 Speaker 51: units that take different land

04:14:38 Speaker 51: needs to accommodate. And then we're

04:14:40 Speaker 51: looking at those. various locations, so

04:14:42 Speaker 51: rural secondary settlements, and and then

04:14:43 Speaker 51: also the primary settlements. So for

04:14:46 Speaker 51: those secondary settlements, we do have

04:14:48 Speaker 51: intensification targets in place for both

04:14:49 Speaker 51: primary and secondary. So we use

04:14:51 Speaker 51: those intensification targets and do some

04:14:52 Speaker 51: math around those unit types by

04:14:54 Speaker 51: location, and then we, yeah. So

04:14:56 Speaker 51: I think so that is getting

04:14:57 Speaker 51: us closer to kind of that

04:15:00 Speaker 51: that land need. and our understanding

04:15:02 Speaker 51: of what types of units are

04:15:04 Speaker 51: going where, for the primary settlement

04:15:07 Speaker 51: areas, the official plan does also

04:15:09 Speaker 51: identify minimum density thresholds. So I

04:15:10 Speaker 51: think that factors into those equations

04:15:11 Speaker 51: as well. So it really is

04:15:15 Speaker 51: based in the policy framework that

04:15:17 Speaker 51: we have here. Those figures really

04:15:19 Speaker 51: do help in this exercise to

04:15:20 Speaker 51: discern what's what's coming. With respect

04:15:22 Speaker 51: to the the secondary homes or

04:15:24 Speaker 51: seasonal units, so the final report

04:15:27 Speaker 51: that you see come back to

04:15:28 Speaker 51: you will include a seasonal forecast

04:15:31 Speaker 51: as well. That is a part

04:15:33 Speaker 51: of this process; it's just not

04:15:35 Speaker 51: captured here. So the intention is

04:15:39 Speaker 51: that the figures you're looking at

04:15:40 Speaker 51: would be permanent populations, the permanent

04:15:43 Speaker 51: resident, whereas there will be a

04:15:45 Speaker 51: seasonal allocation and forecast also advanced

04:15:46 Speaker 51: in in the beginning of next

04:15:48 Speaker 51: year. And with respect to the

04:15:49 Speaker 51: retirees, so I think. you know

04:15:50 Speaker 51: what that one is probably where

04:15:51 Speaker 51: I need to call a friend

04:15:53 Speaker 51: just to kind of understand. You

04:15:55 Speaker 51: know, I think they would be

04:15:57 Speaker 51: picked up in our demographic data.

04:15:59 Speaker 51: I don't necessarily know that we're

04:16:02 Speaker 51: looking at it in terms of

04:16:03 Speaker 51: you know who's in each household,

04:16:06 Speaker 51: but we are looking at kind

04:16:08 Speaker 51: of those population level statistics. So

04:16:10 Speaker 51: I imagine that that would get

04:16:13 Speaker 51: picked up just based on the

04:16:15 Speaker 51: census information we collect the next

04:16:16 Speaker 51: time around, and that would be

04:16:17 Speaker 51: factored in their contribution as well.

04:16:18 Speaker 51: But like I said, you know,

04:16:20 Speaker 51: I think we have seen. that

04:16:21 Speaker 51: participation rate and the workforce activity

04:16:22 Speaker 51: rate declining, and that's likely a

04:16:25 Speaker 51: result of those senior populations moving

04:16:26 Speaker 51: to this area. And so, I

04:16:28 Speaker 51: think the challenge becomes with that

04:16:31 Speaker 51: demographic force. You know, how are

04:16:33 Speaker 51: we doing the work around employment

04:16:34 Speaker 51: lands to try and shift that

04:16:35 Speaker 51: trend to bring other folks into

04:16:37 Speaker 51: those units that are going to

04:16:38 Speaker 51: participate in the workforce as well?

04:16:41 Speaker 51: But I don't think it's a

04:16:42 Speaker 51: negative that those retirees are coming.

04:16:44 Speaker 51: I think it's we just they'll

04:16:47 Speaker 51: have to be factored into the

04:16:48 Speaker 51: data. You said maybe I'd open

04:16:51 Speaker 51: it to Scott or or perhaps

04:16:52 Speaker 51: Patrick, these available if they wanted

04:16:53 Speaker 51: to speak anything further to that

04:16:55 Speaker 51: piece. Just briefly through you, Madam

04:16:56 Speaker 51: Warden. Thank you, Liz. I I

04:16:59 Speaker 51: think just to touch on some

04:17:01 Speaker 51: of the points that that Liz

04:17:02 Speaker 51: talked about there, the the the

04:17:04 Speaker 51: projection the forecast to date are

04:17:05 Speaker 51: are are based on the Ministry

04:17:08 Speaker 51: of Finance numbers and and and

04:17:09 Speaker 51: their Finance numbers and and and

04:17:11 Speaker 51: they're based on the context in

04:17:13 Speaker 51: front of us today. And one

04:17:15 Speaker 51: of the one of the reasons

04:17:17 Speaker 51: why we do review this roughly

04:17:18 Speaker 51: every three to five years is

04:17:20 Speaker 51: because things change. So if any

04:17:22 Speaker 51: individual municipality in grade decided they

04:17:24 Speaker 51: weren't seeing the types of houses

04:17:27 Speaker 20: they needed most, maybe mostly you

04:17:28 Speaker 20: have large singles and you need

04:17:30 Speaker 20: more apartments, and and you took

04:17:31 Speaker 20: a big policy swing, so to

04:17:33 Speaker 20: speak, to increase your densities to

04:17:35 Speaker 20: do things that were going to

04:17:38 Speaker 20: be more supportive of apartments, then

04:17:39 Speaker 20: we could see that shift, and

04:17:41 Speaker 20: that shift affects a number of

04:17:45 Speaker 20: things. including infrastructure planning, but also

04:17:48 Speaker 20: land need, and and so you

04:17:50 Speaker 20: know when we looked at this

04:17:52 Speaker 20: back in two thousand eight or

04:17:55 Speaker 20: in two thousand fifteen, we didn't

04:17:57 Speaker 20: necessarily anticipate the share of apartments

04:17:59 Speaker 20: in the city of Olmstead that

04:18:00 Speaker 20: we're seeing now, and the city's

04:18:01 Speaker 20: done a lot of targeted work

04:18:04 Speaker 20: in that regard to to change

04:18:07 Speaker 20: that. So I'd say the same

04:18:11 Speaker 20: goes for sort of any municipality

04:18:14 Speaker 20: that can get conditions can change,

04:18:19 Speaker 20: and and you know those breakdowns

04:18:21 Speaker 20: of singles and semis and towns

04:18:23 Speaker 20: and and apartments. will change and

04:18:34 Speaker 20: evolve over time. And the only

04:18:37 Speaker 43: other thing I'd say with respect

04:18:38 Speaker 43: to some of what Liz shared

04:18:40 Speaker 43: is that seasonal forecast piece. As

04:18:42 Speaker 43: folks around the horseshoe will probably

04:18:44 Speaker 43: know, it affects some municipalities more

04:18:45 Speaker 43: than others, where we have larger

04:18:48 Speaker 43: numbers of seasonal residents. But the

04:18:49 Speaker 64: one thing that Henson has said

04:18:51 Speaker 64: to us in past growth management

04:18:52 Speaker 51: exercises, and we've even seen this

04:18:53 Speaker 51: anecdotally with county and municipal staff,

04:18:56 Speaker 51: is to some degree a house

04:18:58 Speaker 51: is a house. and and it

04:19:02 Speaker 51: can shift in its housing capacity

04:19:04 Speaker 51: over time. And and what I

04:19:06 Speaker 51: mean is, maybe somebody builds a

04:19:09 Speaker 51: single detached dwelling, and that's their

04:19:10 Speaker 51: second home. They live in Toronto

04:19:11 Speaker 51: or Kitchener, and they come up

04:19:13 Speaker 51: here, you know, for certain months

04:19:15 Speaker 51: of the year, kind of thing.

04:19:16 Speaker 51: But they go to sell that

04:19:18 Speaker 51: home, and and and then that's

04:19:19 Speaker 51: bought by somebody who's a permanent

04:19:21 Speaker 51: resident here. So we used to

04:19:22 Speaker 51: put more stock into trying to

04:19:24 Speaker 51: distinguish between seasonal homes versus permanent

04:19:25 Speaker 51: homes, and and in some municipalities.

04:19:29 Speaker 51: where you might have sort of

04:19:32 Speaker 51: a non winterized cottage that might

04:19:33 Speaker 51: have more stock, but certainly with

04:19:34 Speaker 51: a lot of the the residential

04:19:36 Speaker 51: development we're seeing today, it really

04:19:37 Speaker 51: in some cases does come down

04:19:40 Speaker 51: to who the buyer is and

04:19:42 Speaker 51: and what they choose to use

04:19:43 Speaker 51: that to. And and again, in

04:19:45 Speaker 51: some cases, someone could buy as

04:19:47 Speaker 51: their seasonal home and then choose

04:19:49 Speaker 51: to retire here and that's their

04:19:50 Speaker 51: permanent home. So as Liz said,

04:19:53 Speaker 51: we will have some further thoughts

04:19:53 Speaker 51: on that in in the final

04:19:56 Speaker 51: report, but with with subsequent growth

04:19:58 Speaker 51: management. strategies, it's become less of

04:20:01 Speaker 51: a an issue, if you will,

04:20:02 Speaker 51: because we are seeing more of

04:20:05 Speaker 51: that transition. and And Madam Warden,

04:20:07 Speaker 51: just to bring it back to

04:20:09 Speaker 51: your own municipality, and and CEO

04:20:10 Speaker 51: Scherzer will be aware of this

04:20:12 Speaker 51: as well. When we first started

04:20:14 Speaker 51: talking about the windfall development years

04:20:15 Speaker 51: ago, you know, it was primarily

04:20:16 Speaker 51: thought that that would be largely

04:20:19 Speaker 51: seasonal. And and then as it

04:20:22 Speaker 51: started to build out, and we

04:20:23 Speaker 51: saw more families in there, and

04:20:25 Speaker 51: people expecting, you know, school bus

04:20:26 Speaker 51: pickup and everything else, you know,

04:20:28 Speaker 51: these are sort of very educated

04:20:29 Speaker 51: best guesses, and and we need

04:20:32 Speaker 51: to review and adapt over time.

04:20:33 Speaker 51: And so, if that turn it

04:20:35 Speaker 51: back to to you, Madam Ward.

04:20:37 Speaker 51: Thank you. I was going to

04:20:40 Speaker 51: use that exact example that the

04:20:41 Speaker 51: opposite can happen as well, and

04:20:43 Speaker 51: that and we we have there's

04:20:46 Speaker 51: no way that we can tap

04:20:47 Speaker 51: into the data of who might

04:20:50 Speaker 51: be buying these dwellings. So that

04:20:52 Speaker 51: that was my curious picture. The

04:20:54 Speaker 51: one piece of data though that

04:20:56 Speaker 51: that is concrete is you can

04:20:58 Speaker 51: compare the census, the 2021 census

04:21:01 Speaker 51: of people who are identifying. So

04:21:02 Speaker 51: people who are identifying it as

04:21:04 Speaker 51: their first home, and then you

04:21:10 Speaker 51: can compare it to the voter

04:21:13 Speaker 51: list of the previous election, and

04:21:15 Speaker 51: you will see a stark difference

04:21:18 Speaker 51: in some municipalities. So that that

04:21:19 Speaker 51: is concrete. That is something that

04:21:22 Speaker 51: we do have access to numbers,

04:21:23 Speaker 51: not names, but but the actual

04:21:26 Speaker 51: numbers. Okay. So with that, then

04:21:27 Speaker 51: further questions. I'm looking online. I'm

04:21:28 Speaker 20: not seeing a hand up. We'll

04:21:31 Speaker 20: go to Councillor Eccles. Just a

04:21:34 Speaker 20: quick question. It's always on the

04:21:34 Speaker 20: forecast, and we got to keep

04:21:36 Speaker 20: going year to year. You know,

04:21:38 Speaker 20: five years out, we got to

04:21:43 Speaker 20: review it again because this changed,

04:21:48 Speaker 20: that's changed. We're using Hemson to

04:21:51 Speaker 20: keep developing this going forward. Hemson's

04:21:52 Speaker 20: done this now for four or

04:21:55 Speaker 20: five terms. Turnovers. What's their percentage?

04:21:57 Speaker 20: Are they as good as a

04:21:59 Speaker 20: weatherman? Like they're at twenty percent

04:22:02 Speaker 20: projection correctness? I'll take a shot

04:22:04 Speaker 20: at that one, too, Madam Warden.

04:22:06 Speaker 20: So, in in my time at

04:22:07 Speaker 20: the county, the first time we

04:22:09 Speaker 20: did a growth management strategy because

04:22:10 Speaker 20: it was a new requirement of

04:22:12 Speaker 20: the provincial policy statement at the

04:22:13 Speaker 20: time was 2007-2008, and I was

04:22:16 Speaker 20: actually, as Liz was presenting, I

04:22:18 Speaker 20: was just looking back at that

04:22:20 Speaker 20: growth management strategy. That wasn't Hemson

04:22:24 Speaker 20: that did that. That was a

04:22:26 Speaker 20: firm called Malone. and Parsons, and

04:22:28 Speaker 20: and at that time, one of

04:22:32 Speaker 20: the big revelations in in in

04:22:36 Speaker 20: that study was that Southgate was

04:22:37 Speaker 20: going to absolutely boom, uh, and

04:22:42 Speaker 20: and the prediction at that time

04:22:43 Speaker 20: was that because the province in

04:22:45 Speaker 20: two thousand four ish had introduced

04:22:46 Speaker 65: the green belt, that we would

04:22:51 Speaker 65: see developers leapfrogging the green belt

04:22:53 Speaker 65: was the term at the time,

04:22:56 Speaker 65: and Southgate was primed to actually

04:22:58 Speaker 65: boom, and so we finished that

04:23:00 Speaker 65: study in about April two thousand

04:23:02 Speaker 65: eight, and I think everybody knows

04:23:04 Speaker 65: what happened in April two. thousand

04:23:06 Speaker 65: eight and April two thousand nine,

04:23:08 Speaker 65: or into two thousand nine. We

04:23:10 Speaker 65: had the the global recession, and

04:23:12 Speaker 65: and we didn't see that predicted

04:23:13 Speaker 65: growth in Southgate and some of

04:23:17 Speaker 65: the other municipalities to the same

04:23:20 Speaker 65: degree that we thought we would.

04:23:23 Speaker 65: So fast forward to two thousand

04:23:25 Speaker 65: fourteen. That's when we first retained

04:23:27 Speaker 65: Hempson to do the work. They

04:23:30 Speaker 65: built upon the work that was

04:23:33 Speaker 65: done by the Malone Gibbons Parsons

04:23:36 Speaker 65: and and adjusted some of the

04:23:38 Speaker 65: numbers. But when I reflect

04:23:42 Speaker 65: back on on that original two

04:23:45 Speaker 65: thousand eight study and and that

04:23:47 Speaker 65: two thousand 2008 study and and

04:23:50 Speaker 65: that 2008 study was was forecasting

04:23:52 Speaker 65: us all the way out to

04:23:54 Speaker 65: the year 2031, which at the

04:23:57 Speaker 65: time seemed eons away and now

04:23:58 Speaker 65: seems strangely close. It's it's actually

04:24:00 Speaker 65: not that far off and and

04:24:01 Speaker 65: no doubt we've seen you know

04:24:04 Speaker 65: individual trends that we didn't predict

04:24:07 Speaker 65: and and you know nobody sort

04:24:10 Speaker 65: of had the the pandemic on

04:24:12 Speaker 65: their bingo card or what that

04:24:14 Speaker 65: would do to to the growth

04:24:16 Speaker 65: in that regard. But as we

04:24:18 Speaker 65: get to reflect back and look

04:24:20 Speaker 65: at this in a longer term

04:24:29 Speaker 65: view, we are seeing. sort of

04:24:32 Speaker 65: greater accuracy there. We're no no

04:24:34 Speaker 65: doubt seeing a an increase in

04:24:37 Speaker 65: the growth rate that we didn't

04:24:40 Speaker 65: predict, you know, ten or fifteen

04:24:47 Speaker 65: years ago. But I would say

04:24:49 Speaker 65: it's generally accurate. And just to

04:24:52 Speaker 65: the comments about some about using

04:24:55 Speaker 65: Hempson for the past couple growth

04:24:57 Speaker 10: management strategies. When we go out

04:25:00 Speaker 10: for this work, we have been

04:25:02 Speaker 10: going through competitive bidding processes, and

04:25:04 Speaker 10: and there are very few firms

04:25:07 Speaker 10: in in the province that really

04:25:11 Speaker 10: specialize in this. And and and

04:25:15 Speaker 10: as of recent, the the the

04:25:16 Speaker 65: most recent ones that have been

04:25:19 Speaker 65: winning. these projects have been Hempson,

04:25:22 Speaker 65: and and it's aligned in the

04:25:24 Speaker 65: past well with some of the

04:25:26 Speaker 65: development charges background studies that we've

04:25:29 Speaker 65: done, where Hempson was also the

04:25:33 Speaker 65: successful bidder on that. But we

04:25:42 Speaker 65: we we you know we don't

04:25:44 Speaker 65: have a single source relationship. It

04:25:45 Speaker 65: has been a competitive process in

04:25:49 Speaker 65: that regard. Okay, looking around the

04:25:53 Speaker 65: room, not seeing any further hands

04:25:55 Speaker 65: online or in the room. I

04:25:58 Speaker 65: think you have saturated us with

04:26:00 Speaker 65: data and information. Thank you, but

04:26:02 Speaker 65: we know that the next step

04:26:06 Speaker 20: will be further consideration. So thank

04:26:07 Speaker 20: you. All right. So with that,

04:26:10 Speaker 20: I will call the question. All

04:26:14 Speaker 20: those in favor, and that motion

04:26:17 Speaker 39: is carried. Thank you. All right.

04:26:19 Speaker 39: Madam Clerk is going to make

04:26:23 Speaker 39: her way towards the lectern to

04:26:27 Speaker 39: introduce the next one. In the

04:26:30 Speaker 39: meantime, we will get it on

04:26:38 Speaker 39: the floor. It's recommended that. CCRCW

04:26:40 Speaker 39: 1225 regarding committee appointments for 2026

04:26:41 Speaker 39: be received, and that the warden's

04:26:42 Speaker 39: appointment to the Alternative Land Use

04:26:46 Speaker 39: Services, known as ALIS, and the

04:26:47 Speaker 39: Clean Energy Frontier Program be endorsed,

04:26:49 Speaker 39: and that all appointments noted in

04:26:52 Speaker 39: this report be endorsed and elections

04:26:54 Speaker 39: be held where required. Madam Clerk,

04:26:55 Speaker 39: that's still what we're looking. That's

04:26:56 Speaker 39: still the recommendations that you mentioned

04:26:58 Speaker 39: that you're going to have to

04:27:01 Speaker 39: identify if you changes. Okay, all

04:27:04 Speaker 39: right. So may ask for mover

04:27:05 Speaker 39: in a second. Great. So may

04:27:06 Speaker 39: I ask for a mover and

04:27:09 Speaker 39: a seconder? Okay. Moved by Councillor

04:27:09 Speaker 66: Dobrin, seconded by Councillor McQueen. It's

04:27:12 Speaker 66: now on the floor for discussion.

04:27:14 Speaker 66: Welcome, Madam Clerk. Thank you very

04:27:15 Speaker 66: much. This report comes before you

04:27:18 Speaker 66: as our annual committee report to

04:27:21 Speaker 66: the various committees, task forces, and

04:27:24 Speaker 66: subcommittees that we have, requiring county

04:27:26 Speaker 66: councillors to sit on the those

04:27:28 Speaker 66: various bodies. There are no minimum

04:27:30 Speaker 66: or maximum. number of committees that

04:27:32 Speaker 66: any member must sit on, unless

04:27:33 Speaker 66: there's that specifically stated in the

04:27:37 Speaker 66: terms of reference. Council interest on

04:27:41 Speaker 66: the various committees that we're looking

04:27:44 Speaker 66: for appointments for was expressed, and

04:27:46 Speaker 66: those have been included in the

04:27:48 Speaker 67: report as of the date of

04:27:50 Speaker 67: publishing of the agenda. Since then,

04:27:51 Speaker 67: we have received some additional interest

04:27:53 Speaker 67: in in some of the areas

04:27:54 Speaker 67: where there was vacancies showing up.

04:27:57 Speaker 67: So, Brittany has kindly put those

04:27:59 Speaker 67: up on the screen. for you.

04:28:01 Speaker 67: If you don't mind zooming in

04:28:05 Speaker 67: a little bit, sorry, Brittany. Just

04:28:09 Speaker 67: see we can move through those.

04:28:10 Speaker 67: So, Agricultural Advisory Committee. We had

04:28:12 Speaker 67: a need for one more additional

04:28:18 Speaker 67: member. Councilor Mackey has since indicated

04:28:21 Speaker 67: his interest on that one. So,

04:28:25 Speaker 67: absent any changes in that committee

04:28:26 Speaker 67: proposal, that one is full at

04:28:28 Speaker 67: this time. Budget and Finance Committee.

04:28:30 Speaker 67: There were three additional. council members

04:28:33 Speaker 67: that are opportunities available. We've since

04:28:34 Speaker 67: heard from Councillors Mackie and Greg,

04:28:36 Speaker 67: who expressed interest. So there is

04:28:38 Speaker 67: one available spot there if anyone

04:28:40 Speaker 67: wishes to put their name forward.

04:28:44 Speaker 67: We don't need to fill that

04:28:46 Speaker 67: space. It's up to eight members,

04:28:47 Speaker 67: so the terms of reference are

04:28:50 Speaker 67: very broad in that regard. So

04:28:51 Speaker 22: it's fine as it sits there,

04:28:57 Speaker 22: or it's it's able to accommodate

04:28:59 Speaker 22: an additional person. community drug and

04:29:01 Speaker 22: alcohol strategy. There were three interested

04:29:02 Speaker 22: members, where there are only two

04:29:03 Speaker 22: spaces available. So, absent any indication

04:29:06 Speaker 22: from councillors otherwise, then there would

04:29:09 Speaker 22: be an election required there. I

04:29:11 Speaker 22: see Councillor Mackie's hand. Yes, sorry

04:29:12 Speaker 22: to step in. I'll back off

04:29:15 Speaker 67: on the drug and alcohol, and

04:29:17 Speaker 67: I was on it. last couple

04:29:19 Speaker 67: of terms, so if there's

04:29:22 Speaker 67: interest, we'll let some newcomers take

04:29:25 Speaker 67: over. Thanks. Thank you. So with

04:29:27 Speaker 67: that, we do have a full

04:29:28 Speaker 67: committee there on community drug and

04:29:30 Speaker 67: alcohol strategy. Community services committee requires

04:29:32 Speaker 67: the warden and six members, so

04:29:35 Speaker 67: we have seven members who have

04:29:36 Speaker 67: expressed their interest in that committee.

04:29:39 Speaker 67: So there would. be an election

04:29:41 Speaker 67: required there as well. Just having

04:29:43 Speaker 67: one extra body expressing interest on

04:29:45 Speaker 67: county services, and I think the

04:29:48 Speaker 67: only other one was Gray County

04:29:49 Speaker 67: Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee. There is

04:29:52 Speaker 67: one council member space, and we've

04:29:53 Speaker 67: had interest from two members, being

04:29:55 Speaker 67: Councilors Greg and Dobreen. So there

04:29:59 Speaker 67: is, and the rest I believe

04:30:01 Speaker 67: were were full. and as noted

04:30:03 Speaker 67: in the report. Okay, do we

04:30:05 Speaker 67: need to scroll down the list,

04:30:08 Speaker 67: or the rest were all? Yeah.

04:30:10 Speaker 67: Okay, so I'm going to go

04:30:13 Speaker 67: to Councilor Dobrin. Thank you, thank

04:30:14 Speaker 67: you, Warden, and thank you, Tara.

04:30:18 Speaker 67: Since I sent you that email

04:30:20 Speaker 67: suggesting that I would be. willing

04:30:21 Speaker 67: to fill that vacant spot, Councilor

04:30:24 Speaker 67: Greg, who has sat on that

04:30:28 Speaker 67: committee in the past, did speak

04:30:29 Speaker 67: with me, and I am more

04:30:31 Speaker 67: than happy to step out of

04:30:32 Speaker 67: that election so that there's continuity

04:30:35 Speaker 67: in that committee to the end

04:30:38 Speaker 67: of the term. Okay, thank you

04:30:39 Speaker 67: very much. And anything else? And

04:30:43 Speaker 67: on. And online, do we have

04:30:46 Speaker 67: any hands? Okay, we'll go to

04:30:50 Speaker 67: Councillor Greg. While we're okay, there's

04:30:51 Speaker 67: a shake of the head that

04:30:52 Speaker 67: we don't have anybody's hands raised

04:30:54 Speaker 67: online. Councillor Greg, my question is

04:30:55 Speaker 67: to back up to the Community

04:30:57 Speaker 67: Drug and Alcohol Strategy Committee. I'm

04:31:00 Speaker 67: just wondering the relevancy of us

04:31:02 Speaker 68: having members on that when, in

04:31:04 Speaker 68: the last few years, we've seen

04:31:07 Speaker 53: the expand or the introduction and

04:31:13 Speaker 53: the expansion of the community Reduction

04:31:15 Speaker 53: and the expansion of the community

04:31:17 Speaker 53: safety and well-being committee, and that's

04:31:19 Speaker 53: what makes me wonder if if

04:31:21 Speaker 53: maybe we could learn a little

04:31:22 Speaker 53: bit more about the merits of

04:31:24 Speaker 53: of why we're sitting on on

04:31:28 Speaker 53: that committee as well. I can

04:31:30 Speaker 53: see the merit previous to that

04:31:32 Speaker 53: community safety and well-being, but that's

04:31:34 Speaker 67: kind of what the objective and

04:31:37 Speaker 67: what they're they're charged with with

04:31:39 Speaker 67: doing. I I think. Okay, we'll

04:31:41 Speaker 67: go to Director Shaw. Thank you,

04:31:42 Speaker 67: Madam Warden. We have a number

04:31:44 Speaker 67: of community committees that. actually report

04:31:45 Speaker 67: up to the community and and

04:31:47 Speaker 67: safety and well being program. So

04:31:49 Speaker 67: what the community safety and well

04:31:54 Speaker 67: being does is it has it

04:31:56 Speaker 67: helps assist with any so it

04:31:59 Speaker 67: might be something identified in community

04:32:01 Speaker 67: through survey. Here's an area of

04:32:02 Speaker 67: need. Here's a gap. Then it

04:32:06 Speaker 67: would help identify a group such

04:32:08 Speaker 67: as a community drug and alcohol

04:32:10 Speaker 67: in order to fill that gap.

04:32:11 Speaker 67: So that's what it does. It's

04:32:13 Speaker 20: more of a coordinating. body and

04:32:16 Speaker 20: ensuring that the right pieces are

04:32:20 Speaker 20: there and the gaps are filled.

04:32:24 Speaker 20: It doesn't necessarily provide the the

04:32:27 Speaker 20: expertise. We leave that part to

04:32:29 Speaker 20: people like CMHA and others that

04:32:32 Speaker 20: are on the community drug and

04:32:35 Speaker 20: alcohol committee. So it really is

04:32:39 Speaker 20: a coordinating body. Is there is

04:32:41 Speaker 20: there a follow up, Councillor Gray?

04:32:44 Speaker 20: If it was if it was

04:32:49 Speaker 65: more purely a reporting function, then

04:32:51 Speaker 65: I just I would question why

04:32:53 Speaker 65: we would would have two conduits

04:32:54 Speaker 65: back and forth as well as

04:32:55 Speaker 65: the community safety. We wouldn't probably

04:32:56 Speaker 65: profess to be the experts in

04:32:58 Speaker 65: the material, so I just wondered

04:33:03 Speaker 65: if if it's still just a

04:33:04 Speaker 69: reporting function, then I can understand

04:33:07 Speaker 29: it being like a subset of

04:33:12 Speaker 29: the community safety and well being.

04:33:15 Speaker 29: But is it still is it

04:33:17 Speaker 29: reporting or is it something? something

04:33:19 Speaker 29: beyond reporting? It through you, Madam

04:33:22 Speaker 29: Ward. So the community drug and

04:33:25 Speaker 29: alcohol itself does the body of

04:33:28 Speaker 22: the work. So they have a

04:33:30 Speaker 22: group that's come together that has

04:33:32 Speaker 22: identified areas in our community that

04:33:36 Speaker 22: probably need some focus. There is

04:33:38 Speaker 22: a peer advisory committee too. So

04:33:39 Speaker 22: these are people with lived experience

04:33:42 Speaker 22: that would comment on projects going

04:33:47 Speaker 22: forward. We've used the peer committee

04:33:48 Speaker 22: ourselves when looking at some affordable

04:33:50 Speaker 22: housing specific. to transitional housing or

04:33:51 Speaker 22: supportive housing, but what the community?

04:33:55 Speaker 22: So it's not necessarily just a

04:33:57 Speaker 22: reporting body; it's an action group.

04:34:00 Speaker 22: So there are actions that are

04:34:01 Speaker 22: happening. So what happens with the

04:34:02 Speaker 22: community safety and well-being?

04:34:06 Speaker 22: It also has action groups under

04:34:09 Speaker 22: it too, right? So instead of

04:34:11 Speaker 22: duplicating, we work with what's already

04:34:13 Speaker 29: existing in the community. If there

04:34:15 Speaker 29: hadn't been an existing community drug

04:34:18 Speaker 39: and alcohol committee already, then we

04:34:22 Speaker 39: probably would have had to develop.

04:34:24 Speaker 39: one through community safety and well-being

04:34:26 Speaker 39: because that's certainly something that has

04:34:29 Speaker 39: been identified. So, if you look

04:34:31 Speaker 39: at mental health, addictions, poverty, these

04:34:34 Speaker 39: are ones that crime prevention. These

04:34:35 Speaker 39: are groups that these are areas

04:34:37 Speaker 39: that have been identified through community

04:34:42 Speaker 39: safety and well-being surveys that we

04:34:46 Speaker 39: need to focus in. But if

04:34:54 Speaker 39: there's already an existing group, then

04:34:56 Speaker 39: that it's they're just there to

04:34:59 Speaker 39: support that group, and the. safety

04:35:00 Speaker 39: and well-being program also has another

04:35:03 Speaker 39: side to it, where it has

04:35:06 Speaker 39: our star table, in which

04:35:08 Speaker 39: there are elevated risk to certain

04:35:10 Speaker 39: individuals. Then they would pull together

04:35:14 Speaker 39: for wraparound services. So the community

04:35:15 Speaker 39: safety and well-being has a number

04:35:19 Speaker 65: of layers to it. One of

04:35:21 Speaker 65: them being action groups, but we

04:35:22 Speaker 65: didn't want to duplicate services if

04:35:24 Speaker 65: there was already something in the

04:35:28 Speaker 65: community. Okay. Are there any other

04:35:30 Speaker 65: questions? Yes. we'll go to Councillor

04:35:34 Speaker 65: Mackie. Thank you, Madam Ward. I

04:35:36 Speaker 65: just want to follow up on

04:35:38 Speaker 65: what Councillor Greg is saying. I

04:35:40 Speaker 65: have—I was on that committee for

04:35:42 Speaker 65: a number of years, and there

04:35:43 Speaker 65: was a an executive coordinator position.

04:35:47 Speaker 10: Is that position still there, and

04:35:49 Speaker 10: is it being funded? Are we

04:35:53 Speaker 10: still funding through Grey and Bruce

04:35:56 Speaker 10: Counties for that position? Through you,

04:35:58 Speaker 10: Madam Ward. Yes, we are. So.

04:36:02 Speaker 10: there is a full time executive

04:36:04 Speaker 10: executive position. It is funded fifty

04:36:05 Speaker 10: fifty through Grey County, Bruce County.

04:36:07 Speaker 10: It's not quite fifty fifty. It's

04:36:08 Speaker 10: by population. I think it's forty

04:36:10 Speaker 10: seven fifty three. That kind of

04:36:12 Speaker 10: idea. And that person not only

04:36:13 Speaker 10: provides assistance to all of the

04:36:15 Speaker 20: action groups, but it also coordinates

04:36:16 Speaker 20: and initiates all of the star

04:36:18 Speaker 20: table, attends all of the committee

04:36:22 Speaker 20: meetings that are at the provincial

04:36:24 Speaker 20: level to ensure that we're also

04:36:26 Speaker 20: involved at the provincial level. and

04:36:28 Speaker 20: we have a new survey that's

04:36:30 Speaker 20: going to be coming out in

04:36:32 Speaker 20: twenty six two to relook at

04:36:34 Speaker 20: where our areas of need in

04:36:36 Speaker 20: the community are. Okay. Any other

04:36:38 Speaker 20: comments? Looking around the room, you

04:36:41 Speaker 53: know, online, not seeing any. Okay.

04:36:44 Speaker 53: So, Madam Clerk and Madam Deputy

04:36:46 Speaker 53: Clerk, if you could please summarize

04:36:48 Speaker 53: the actions we need to take.

04:36:51 Speaker 53: So, we really, I think there

04:36:53 Speaker 53: are there is still. Do you

04:36:55 Speaker 53: want to just go piece by?

04:37:04 Speaker 53: piece. I will leave it to

04:37:06 Speaker 53: your your process expertise. The floor

04:37:08 Speaker 53: is yours. Thank you. So recognizing

04:37:09 Speaker 53: the comments from Councillor McKay and

04:37:11 Speaker 53: Councillor Dobrine about withdrawing their names

04:37:13 Speaker 53: from the Community Drug and Alcohol

04:37:16 Speaker 53: and the Accessibility Advisory Committee, that

04:37:17 Speaker 53: only leaves the Community Services Committee

04:37:21 Speaker 53: with one extra member, so we

04:37:24 Speaker 70: could. proceed with an election for

04:37:29 Speaker 70: that committee if there are no

04:37:32 Speaker 70: other withdrawals to suggest. Okay, so

04:37:33 Speaker 70: there on the screen is the

04:37:35 Speaker 70: final count of those who are

04:37:37 Speaker 70: interested in being on that. It

04:37:40 Speaker 70: is one too many, so we

04:37:42 Speaker 70: would need to do an election.

04:37:44 Speaker 44: Are there any final comments? Yes,

04:37:46 Speaker 44: Councillor Greg. Well, if I could,

04:37:48 Speaker 44: I'd just like to speak to

04:37:51 Speaker 44: my candidacy. I would take a

04:37:55 Speaker 44: moment to. acknowledge that I think

04:38:00 Speaker 44: I would be an excellent candidate

04:38:01 Speaker 44: for that committee, being that significant

04:38:03 Speaker 44: amount of the community services is

04:38:05 Speaker 44: directed through our municipality in Owen

04:38:07 Speaker 44: Sound, so we are a little

04:38:10 Speaker 44: more so impacted, perhaps, than some

04:38:12 Speaker 44: other municipalities. So I think myself

04:38:14 Speaker 44: sitting on that committee is is

04:38:15 Speaker 44: particularly filling an acute function between

04:38:21 Speaker 20: the. county and the city in

04:38:22 Speaker 20: terms of some of the support

04:38:24 Speaker 20: services that are encapsulated within that

04:38:26 Speaker 20: committee. Okay, so then I will

04:38:27 Speaker 20: then open it to the floor

04:38:32 Speaker 20: for any others whose name is

04:38:35 Speaker 20: on the list for community services

04:38:36 Speaker 20: to make any other comments. I'll

04:38:37 Speaker 20: go to Councillor Dobrin. Thank you.

04:38:39 Speaker 20: I have two questions. It indicates

04:38:41 Speaker 20: that it's in-person meetings, but we

04:38:42 Speaker 20: have been able to participate hybridly,

04:38:43 Speaker 20: especially in. inclement weather. The other

04:38:45 Speaker 20: question that I had was, I've

04:38:47 Speaker 20: been on that committee, and it

04:38:48 Speaker 20: is actually other than being the

04:38:51 Speaker 20: alternate on the Grey Federation of

04:38:56 Speaker 71: Agriculture, which the appointee, Councillor McQueen,

04:38:58 Speaker 71: I don't think has missed a

04:39:00 Speaker 71: meeting. So, I would like to

04:39:02 Speaker 71: remain on that Community Services Committee

04:39:04 Speaker 71: and wonder the value of having

04:39:06 Speaker 71: two representatives from Chatsworth, although they

04:39:09 Speaker 71: both bring that. They both bring

04:39:15 Speaker 71: value to the committee, but do

04:39:15 Speaker 20: we need two representatives from one

04:39:17 Speaker 20: municipality? So, Madam Clerk, is there

04:39:20 Speaker 20: any any reason why we cannot

04:39:21 Speaker 20: have two from one municipality? The

04:39:25 Speaker 20: terms of reference for this particular

04:39:26 Speaker 20: committee currently state that it's the

04:39:28 Speaker 20: ward and six members, so not

04:39:31 Speaker 20: restricted to any one municipality. I

04:39:32 Speaker 20: believe planning and economic development and

04:39:35 Speaker 20: the Planning PDAC Planning Economic Development

04:39:36 Speaker 72: Advisory Committee is the only one

04:39:37 Speaker 72: that requires membership from each municipality,

04:39:41 Speaker 72: but the rest are more flexible

04:39:43 Speaker 72: in that nature. Okay, thank you.

04:39:45 Speaker 72: Are any other comments from any

04:39:46 Speaker 72: of the other members whose name

04:39:48 Speaker 72: is standing? I'll go to Councillor

04:39:51 Speaker 72: McKay. Yes, thank you. I would

04:39:53 Speaker 72: like to stay on the Community

04:39:56 Speaker 72: Service Committee. Forty-one years of being

04:39:59 Speaker 72: healthcare work in the city of

04:40:02 Speaker 72: Mont Saint, the county of Grey.

04:40:06 Speaker 20: I've seen a lot of different

04:40:08 Speaker 20: parts of the community, and I've

04:40:09 Speaker 20: dealt with a lot of the

04:40:11 Speaker 20: services. So, I think this sounds

04:40:13 Speaker 73: kind of like getting into elections

04:40:15 Speaker 73: in twenty twenty-six. But, but I

04:40:18 Speaker 73: think I would be very intelligent

04:40:20 Speaker 73: person to be on this committee.

04:40:25 Speaker 73: So, thank you very much. Thank

04:40:27 Speaker 20: you. Yes, and I am putting

04:40:29 Speaker 20: a call out to any of

04:40:30 Speaker 20: the members who who have offered

04:40:33 Speaker 20: their name as a willing partner,

04:40:35 Speaker 20: a willing member of the committee

04:40:37 Speaker 20: to go ahead and speak their

04:40:39 Speaker 20: comments. So this is the moment

04:40:43 Speaker 74: for us to hear from each

04:40:45 Speaker 65: of the members that wishes to

04:40:47 Speaker 65: speak. I think I saw my

04:40:51 Speaker 65: hand, Councillor Mackey. Your hand is

04:40:52 Speaker 65: up. Thank you, Madam Warden, and

04:40:54 Speaker 65: I agree with Councillor DeGraffenreid

04:40:56 Speaker 65: that we do not need two

04:41:01 Speaker 65: members from. the Township of Chatsworth

04:41:03 Speaker 65: on this committee. However, I have

04:41:05 Speaker 75: served on this committee for a

04:41:08 Speaker 75: number of years, so I'm not

04:41:10 Speaker 75: the new guy to the committee.

04:41:11 Speaker 75: I've worked in social services for

04:41:15 Speaker 75: the the last 42 years and

04:41:18 Speaker 75: have a pretty good knowledge of

04:41:22 Speaker 75: of the system. And I would

04:41:24 Speaker 75: like to continue as a county

04:41:28 Speaker 75: representative on the social service committee.

04:41:35 Speaker 39: And I would appreciate everyone's support

04:41:37 Speaker 39: in my reelection. Thank you. Election.

04:41:40 Speaker 39: Thank you. I'm navigating navigating ward

04:41:41 Speaker 39: waters here as the warden, and

04:41:44 Speaker 39: I don't think even as the

04:41:47 Speaker 39: mayor, I've ever needed to go

04:41:48 Speaker 39: to an election for committee members.

04:41:52 Speaker 39: I'm going to lean carefully into

04:41:56 Speaker 39: the process of the clerk's advice.

04:42:00 Speaker 39: I saw a hand go up

04:42:02 Speaker 39: over here. I think, Councillor Kenner.

04:42:05 Speaker 39: Thank you, Warden Matrasaws, and through

04:42:07 Speaker 39: you. I usually am very magnanimous

04:42:16 Speaker 39: and often step down in favor

04:42:19 Speaker 39: of others. But this is the

04:42:21 Speaker 39: only committee that I serve on.

04:42:25 Speaker 39: I've not missed a meeting. It's

04:42:26 Speaker 39: been a very bit of a

04:42:29 Speaker 39: learning curve, but it's been very

04:42:32 Speaker 39: rewarding as well, and I've enjoyed

04:42:33 Speaker 39: serving on it. And I, if

04:42:35 Speaker 39: I am elected, I will do

04:42:38 Speaker 39: my very best to represent Owens'

04:42:39 Speaker 39: interests and Leefridge's. Town's interests and

04:42:42 Speaker 39: Leeford's and everyone on County Council.

04:42:44 Speaker 39: Thank you. Thank you. Are there

04:42:45 Speaker 39: any other members who whose name

04:42:50 Speaker 39: is being offered to the list

04:42:53 Speaker 39: that wish to speak? Yeah. In

04:42:58 Speaker 39: the meantime, I'll go to Madam

04:43:00 Speaker 39: Clerk. At risk of speaking for

04:43:02 Speaker 39: Councillor Nielsen, he's just online, and

04:43:04 Speaker 39: you just can check in with

04:43:06 Speaker 39: him to see if he has

04:43:08 Speaker 39: any comments. Okay. Yes, I have

04:43:12 Speaker 39: been watching for hands. There. okay,

04:43:13 Speaker 39: there. The virtual hands gone up

04:43:17 Speaker 39: and down. So, Councillor Nielsen, would

04:43:19 Speaker 20: you like to say something? I

04:43:21 Speaker 20: I wasn't planning campaigning here today.

04:43:23 Speaker 20: I enjoy the community services, and

04:43:25 Speaker 20: I've been open and honest that

04:43:26 Speaker 20: the whole reason I ran for

04:43:28 Speaker 20: county council was to be part

04:43:32 Speaker 20: of community services. I've been the

04:43:36 Speaker 20: chair for the last three years.

04:43:40 Speaker 20: I would love to continue to

04:43:41 Speaker 20: be the chair and continue to

04:43:43 Speaker 20: be on this committee. And I

04:43:44 Speaker 20: won't I won't say any more.

04:43:46 Speaker 20: I'm I'm enjoying hearing everybody. plead

04:43:47 Speaker 20: their case. I can just say,

04:43:50 Speaker 20: isn't it wonderful that something such

04:43:53 Speaker 20: as community services is a hot

04:43:54 Speaker 20: spot that everybody wants to sit

04:43:55 Speaker 20: on? I think that's excellent news.

04:43:58 Speaker 20: It demonstrates the commitment that that

04:44:03 Speaker 20: is around this horseshoe. Councillor Dicker,

04:44:04 Speaker 20: would you like to say anything?

04:44:05 Speaker 20: I guess I'd be the odd

04:44:09 Speaker 20: guy out if I didn't say

04:44:13 Speaker 20: something. But I, as well, I.

04:44:17 Speaker 20: I really do enjoy that committee.

04:44:19 Speaker 20: It's very educational. It. I have

04:44:21 Speaker 20: served as vice chair on that

04:44:23 Speaker 20: committee for the last three years,

04:44:24 Speaker 20: I guess, and I, I

04:44:28 Speaker 20: too would like to stay on

04:44:32 Speaker 05: there. So whatever the wishes of

04:44:36 Speaker 05: the horseshoe here are, that was

04:44:38 Speaker 05: I would do what we look

04:44:40 Speaker 05: with. But I would appreciate staying

04:44:42 Speaker 05: on as well. Okay, thank you.

04:44:43 Speaker 05: And so we've heard from all

04:44:45 Speaker 05: the members whose names have

04:44:49 Speaker 05: been put forth. I'll go to

04:44:53 Speaker 05: Councillor Patterson. who has raised her

04:44:54 Speaker 20: hand. Thank you, Madam Warden. I'm

04:44:56 Speaker 20: wondering if County Council would consider

04:44:58 Speaker 20: expanding the committee by one, since

04:44:59 Speaker 20: we have such good representatives for

04:45:00 Speaker 20: this committee. Make it easier on

04:45:01 Speaker 20: us on the vote. So, Madam

04:45:03 Speaker 20: Clerk, what is the the parameter

04:45:06 Speaker 20: that we can operate in in

04:45:11 Speaker 20: terms of expanding? Can we do

04:45:13 Speaker 20: a motion before this motion to

04:45:15 Speaker 20: add? It doesn't. It doesn't tip

04:45:17 Speaker 20: quorum. so so I'll just let

04:45:19 Speaker 20: you answer for the benefit of

04:45:21 Speaker 20: anyone following. Thank you. So, if

04:45:23 Speaker 20: if council wishes to add an

04:45:26 Speaker 20: additional member to the committee, the

04:45:28 Speaker 65: terms of reference on this one

04:45:32 Speaker 65: are very specific, so it would

04:45:34 Speaker 65: require a motion to amend the

04:45:36 Speaker 65: terms of reference to add one

04:45:37 Speaker 65: additional member, and that could be

04:45:39 Speaker 65: done here today if you wish.

04:45:41 Speaker 65: You've heard it from the clerk.

04:45:44 Speaker 65: From the quirk. So, what is

04:45:45 Speaker 65: the will of the committee? The

04:45:50 Speaker 65: whole proceed to election, or is

04:45:52 Speaker 65: there somebody who is going to

04:45:54 Speaker 65: move the composition motion regarding the

04:45:56 Speaker 65: composition, Councillor Debray? I'm quite prepared.

04:45:59 Speaker 65: If I'm not selected to be

04:46:01 Speaker 65: on this committee, I I wave

04:46:04 Speaker 65: to Council. I don't think that

04:46:07 Speaker 65: in a difficult budget year that

04:46:08 Speaker 20: we should be adding more members

04:46:09 Speaker 20: to a committee because we're afraid.

04:46:10 Speaker 20: to step down, but as a

04:46:13 Speaker 20: member of the Township of Southgate,

04:46:14 Speaker 20: that is experiencing or has experienced

04:46:16 Speaker 20: significant growth and in migration from

04:46:18 Speaker 20: our GTA partners, experiencing the the

04:46:20 Speaker 20: loss of a of a county

04:46:25 Speaker 20: housing project because of Grand River

04:46:27 Speaker 20: Conservation Authority. I feel I bring

04:46:30 Speaker 20: value to this community. I feel

04:46:31 Speaker 20: I bring value to this committee,

04:46:33 Speaker 20: so that's my election pitch. I

04:46:35 Speaker 20: I will propose that we go

04:46:36 Speaker 20: to an election and let the

04:46:37 Speaker 20: chips fall where they may. Okay,

04:46:40 Speaker 53: we'll go to Councillor Kuntner. Thank

04:46:42 Speaker 53: you, Warden. I'm very impressed with

04:46:43 Speaker 53: the dedication of everyone and their

04:46:46 Speaker 53: their interest in it. I'm a

04:46:48 Speaker 53: very busy mayor, and so I

04:46:49 Speaker 53: will withdraw. Okay, thank you very

04:46:51 Speaker 53: much, Councillor Kentner, and I do

04:46:54 Speaker 53: see Councillor McQueen's hand up on

04:46:56 Speaker 53: the virtual line. Yeah, thank you,

04:46:58 Speaker 53: Madam Ward. I was going to

04:47:01 Speaker 53: move, if or second the idea

04:47:03 Speaker 53: that Sue Patterson had with regards

04:47:06 Speaker 53: to increasing one. If if we

04:47:11 Speaker 53: have this great interest, and I

04:47:14 Speaker 53: understand that Mayor Beefe has made

04:47:17 Speaker 53: that comment. but I think he's

04:47:19 Speaker 53: very passionate about being on here.

04:47:21 Speaker 20: If Councillor Patterson was going to

04:47:23 Speaker 20: move that motion, I would second

04:47:25 Speaker 20: it. So, Councillor Patterson, are you

04:47:27 Speaker 20: moving that motion? Yes, I will

04:47:29 Speaker 20: move that motion. Okay. So, so

04:47:31 Speaker 20: I didn't hear a motion, but

04:47:33 Speaker 20: I did hear Councillor Patterson float

04:47:36 Speaker 20: that she was interested in in

04:47:38 Speaker 32: moving that motion, and I've heard

04:47:40 Speaker 32: that there is a willing. seconder,

04:47:42 Speaker 32: so Councillor Patterson is moving that

04:47:44 Speaker 32: the terms of reference of the

04:47:46 Speaker 32: committee of the Community Services Committee

04:47:47 Speaker 32: be updated. It's been moved by

04:47:48 Speaker 32: Councillor Patterson and seconded by Councillor

04:47:50 Speaker 32: McQueen, so it's now on the

04:47:52 Speaker 32: floor for discussion. In the meantime,

04:47:55 Speaker 32: we've heard from Councillor Kenner, who

04:47:57 Speaker 32: has offered to withdraw his name

04:47:59 Speaker 32: for this particular term cycle. We'll

04:48:01 Speaker 32: go to Councillor Alternate Councillor Hutchinson.

04:48:03 Speaker 32: Yes, appreciate the the conversation, and

04:48:06 Speaker 32: it sounds like there's a lot

04:48:10 Speaker 32: of interest. I'm almost wondering if

04:48:11 Speaker 32: if it should if they're going

04:48:13 Speaker 32: to review the terms of reference

04:48:15 Speaker 32: that you should look at making

04:48:19 Speaker 32: this one represented from each municipality,

04:48:21 Speaker 32: since all municipalities are affected by

04:48:23 Speaker 32: these services. So just something to

04:48:25 Speaker 32: keep in mind if they are

04:48:29 Speaker 32: going to look at reviewing the

04:48:30 Speaker 20: terms. So thank you. Okay, so

04:48:37 Speaker 20: that, Madam Clerk, would have to

04:48:41 Speaker 20: be an amendment. to the main

04:48:42 Speaker 20: motion that's on the floor right

04:48:43 Speaker 20: now. I apologize; I was distracted,

04:48:45 Speaker 20: distracting myself with a clarification on

04:48:47 Speaker 20: the potential vacancy that we now

04:48:49 Speaker 20: have while we're increasing to an

04:48:52 Speaker 20: additional member. So I was just

04:48:54 Speaker 20: getting clarification from Councillor Kenner. Could

04:48:55 Speaker 20: you repeat the question? Alternate Councillor

04:48:57 Speaker 20: Hutchinson asked if if if if

04:48:59 Speaker 20: it were to. be since we're

04:49:03 Speaker 65: discussing a motion to expand the

04:49:05 Speaker 65: number of of people sitting on

04:49:06 Speaker 65: it, the question that he had

04:49:09 Speaker 65: is, what about making it one

04:49:11 Speaker 65: from each of the nine municipalities,

04:49:12 Speaker 65: like the economic development, the economic

04:49:13 Speaker 65: development committee? That was his question.

04:49:15 Speaker 65: I'll let you speak. I asked

04:49:18 Speaker 65: then to me that that sounds

04:49:21 Speaker 65: too substantial to what we've just

04:49:23 Speaker 65: said. That would have to be

04:49:27 Speaker 65: an amendment to the motion that's

04:49:28 Speaker 65: on the floor right now from.

04:49:29 Speaker 20: Councilor Patterson and Councilor McLean. Do

04:49:31 Speaker 20: you concur, or am I losing

04:49:33 Speaker 20: my path? I do agree with

04:49:43 Speaker 20: that, and and what I could

04:49:46 Speaker 20: suggest is that towards the end

04:49:47 Speaker 20: of each council term, the clerks

04:49:51 Speaker 20: department does a review with senior

04:49:53 Speaker 20: staff at the Grey County, and

04:49:54 Speaker 20: we look at the committee structure,

04:49:55 Speaker 20: what committees we think we will

04:49:59 Speaker 20: need going forward, what ones are

04:50:02 Speaker 25: have become redundant or met their

04:50:04 Speaker 25: their their goals. So there is

04:50:05 Speaker 29: a report coming forward in 2026

04:50:06 Speaker 29: that will look at all of

04:50:09 Speaker 29: that, and we'll look for council's

04:50:10 Speaker 29: feedback on along with the staff

04:50:18 Speaker 29: recommendation on what those committees could

04:50:19 Speaker 29: look like for the next term

04:50:21 Speaker 29: of council. Okay. So and this,

04:50:23 Speaker 29: of course, being an advisory committee

04:50:27 Speaker 29: that simply makes its recommendations to

04:50:31 Speaker 29: the full council, who participates in

04:50:33 Speaker 29: actual decision making on whichever topic.

04:50:35 Speaker 29: so Councillor Hutchinson, are you moving

04:50:36 Speaker 29: that motion, the amendment to the

04:50:37 Speaker 29: main motion? No, I'll I'll leave

04:50:38 Speaker 29: it at this time. It sounds

04:50:41 Speaker 29: like they're going to review it,

04:50:43 Speaker 29: so just something to keep in

04:50:45 Speaker 29: mind in the future. Okay, thank

04:50:47 Speaker 29: you. So we are still with

04:50:49 Speaker 29: the motion from Councillor Patterson and

04:50:56 Speaker 29: Councillor McQueen to add one more

04:50:59 Speaker 29: position on the committee. I'll go

04:51:01 Speaker 29: to Councillor Mackie. Mr. Mayor, I

04:51:02 Speaker 29: would encourage Councillor Cantley to. Councillor

04:51:06 Speaker 29: Kentler to leave his name in

04:51:08 Speaker 29: the hat, and we're all big

04:51:10 Speaker 29: people around here, and we've all

04:51:12 Speaker 29: been through elections, and most have

04:51:14 Speaker 29: won and lost. And I think

04:51:16 Speaker 76: we should have an election. I

04:51:19 Speaker 76: don't think we need to add

04:51:21 Speaker 76: an additional position every time we're

04:51:23 Speaker 76: faced with an election. We did

04:51:24 Speaker 76: that with the Budget and Finance

04:51:26 Speaker 76: Committee, and which is fine, but

04:51:27 Speaker 65: I don't think that's necessary just

04:51:29 Speaker 65: because we've got got a lot

04:51:30 Speaker 65: of interested parties, all very good

04:51:32 Speaker 65: candidates, and the committee will be

04:51:33 Speaker 65: well served. regardless of who we

04:51:36 Speaker 65: select. So, I think we should

04:51:37 Speaker 65: just carry on. Okay. Thank you.

04:51:39 Speaker 20: Any other comments on this this

04:51:41 Speaker 20: motion to add an extra position?

04:51:43 Speaker 20: Okay. Oh, was that a hand,

04:51:44 Speaker 20: Councillor McQueen? Yes. Go ahead. Just

04:51:46 Speaker 20: following up with with you, Madam

04:51:50 Speaker 20: Warden. The comments that been made.

04:51:51 Speaker 20: I think it's when you have

04:51:53 Speaker 20: an election and and and In

04:51:55 Speaker 20: in in by a simple by

04:51:57 Speaker 20: this simple motion that's there, this

04:51:59 Speaker 20: allows everybody who has strong interest

04:52:01 Speaker 20: to be on this for this

04:52:06 Speaker 20: particular year. I worry about when

04:52:08 Speaker 20: you have an election and somebody

04:52:09 Speaker 20: ends up not successful. We have

04:52:14 Speaker 20: a lot. We have all great

04:52:16 Speaker 20: candidates here, and I would just

04:52:18 Speaker 20: prefer us to call the question

04:52:20 Speaker 20: and see if that does carry,

04:52:23 Speaker 20: and then we move from there.

04:52:25 Speaker 20: If it doesn't, then I guess

04:52:26 Speaker 20: the default would be election. But

04:52:29 Speaker 20: I just I you know I

04:52:33 Speaker 77: know that. as the member said,

04:52:35 Speaker 77: we we're big people here. But

04:52:37 Speaker 77: for one person to add to

04:53:34 Speaker 77: this, I think it's a simple

04:53:37 Speaker 77: matter of of just adding that

04:53:38 Speaker 77: for this year. Thank you. So

04:53:41 Speaker 77: call the question, I guess. Okay,

04:53:44 Speaker 77: thank you. Well, I don't see

04:53:46 Speaker 77: any further hands up. And oh

04:53:49 Speaker 29: wait, we we've got Councillor Carleton.

04:53:52 Speaker 29: Go ahead, Councillor Carleton. Thank you.

04:53:56 Speaker 29: If we're concerned about the added

04:53:58 Speaker 78: person on that committee, budget and

04:53:59 Speaker 78: finance is running short, so we're

04:54:01 Speaker 78: just moving one to the other.

04:54:03 Speaker 78: So it all comes out in

04:54:07 Speaker 78: the wash. Yes, Madam Clerk. So

04:54:12 Speaker 78: just for confirmation, so we're all

04:54:17 Speaker 78: operating from the same page. Right

04:54:19 Speaker 20: now, there's the motion for to

04:54:21 Speaker 20: increase by one member to a

04:54:23 Speaker 20: total of seven plus the warden.

04:54:25 Speaker 20: But we have had a withdrawal

04:54:26 Speaker 20: as. well, so there will not.

04:54:28 Speaker 20: If if this goes through, we

04:54:30 Speaker 20: won't have. There won't be an

04:54:32 Speaker 20: election either either way. We we

04:54:34 Speaker 20: will still be looking for a

04:54:35 Speaker 20: member if this motion does pass,

04:54:37 Speaker 20: because Councillor Kenner has withdrawn his

04:54:38 Speaker 20: name unless he would like to

04:54:39 Speaker 20: re-add it back in. Yes, I

04:54:41 Speaker 20: think we have to not get

04:54:43 Speaker 20: too far ahead of ourselves. We

04:54:44 Speaker 79: have to entertain this motion. Then,

04:54:48 Speaker 79: when we know how many positions

04:54:49 Speaker 79: there are, then I will give

04:54:52 Speaker 79: the privilege. And I will give

04:54:54 Speaker 79: the privilege to Councillor Kentner to

04:54:56 Speaker 79: voice whether or not he is

04:54:59 Speaker 79: interested. Should this create a vacancy?

04:55:00 Speaker 79: Okay, so I don't see any

04:55:02 Speaker 79: further hands up. Then I will

04:55:03 Speaker 79: ask. Then all those in favor

04:55:07 Speaker 29: of adding the extra position to

04:55:08 Speaker 29: the Community Services Committee, and I

04:55:10 Speaker 29: see five. Yeah, so that motion

04:55:14 Speaker 29: fails. So. we are still at

04:55:17 Speaker 29: the same number of positions. And

04:55:19 Speaker 29: Councillor Kentner, just because we've just

04:55:23 Speaker 29: had that motion, I'll just confirm

04:55:25 Speaker 29: with you that are you still

04:55:26 Speaker 29: willing to withdraw your name? Yes,

04:55:30 Speaker 29: I am. Thank you. Thank you.

04:55:31 Speaker 29: Okay, so then, Madam Clerk, that

04:55:34 Speaker 29: means that we will not have

04:55:36 Speaker 29: to have an election. We have

04:55:38 Speaker 29: now filled all of the available

04:55:39 Speaker 29: positions. Director Shaw, don't you feel

04:55:41 Speaker 29: good about being so popular? So

04:55:43 Speaker 29: again, it's a wonderful testimony to

04:55:45 Speaker 29: all of those, everyone around the

04:55:48 Speaker 29: table that cares about this topic

04:55:53 Speaker 29: and who are duly electing their

04:55:57 Speaker 29: colleagues to to get get through

04:55:59 Speaker 29: the the the the details of

04:56:00 Speaker 29: the items that come across that

04:56:02 Speaker 29: table and be able to present

04:56:03 Speaker 29: them to all of us so

04:56:05 Speaker 80: that we can all buy in

04:56:08 Speaker 80: and all make those decisions together.

04:56:11 Speaker 80: So it is wonderful to see such enthusiasm for all. of the participation of the committees. I appreciate that. So, with that, then, Madam Clerk, do you have any other business that you need? Just to, there's the motion on the floor. So perhaps voting on that, and then to make the appointments official. Just a main motion to appoint the extra, the additional members that have not been outlined in the report. It does. help us for auditing and record keeping that we we go through that actual formal process. Okay, so you want us to call the the question that is currently on the floor moved and seconded, and then we'll do an additional motion to identify the names that were added because they're not in the report. If somebody looked at this years from now, they'd need to see the continuity of all the names. Okay, so with that, then the original motion was moved and seconded. We are back to accepting what's in the report. We will then add the additional names with an additional motion. So on this motion that is currently on the floor, all those in favor, and that is passed. And then we will need a second motion then to accept the additional names that fill the vacancies that were described in the report. That's moved by Councillor Mackey, seconded by Councillor Eccles. Any dis? Any discussion, Councillor Mackey? Thank you, Warren. On the Budget and Finance Committee, did we not establish that we wanted a representative from each municipality? So we would, was that not the reason we extended it an additional member so that that each municipality would have representation? I thought that was the purpose of expanding the membership. When if that's the case, I believe Southgate is the municipality that's missing from that committee. I do recall the discussion, but Madam Clerk, I thought we didn't. Madam Clerk, I thought we didn't—that didn't actually pass. Okay. Which is reviewing the terms of reference. We and I, I can't remember what the specific motions were that were considered, but the terms of reference that were adopted had the warden plus up to eight members, and there's no specific mention of representation from each municipality. Okay, so thank you for raising that clarification. So it is possible for there to be one from each municipality, but it is not required as in comparison to the economic development. Okay, and there remains one vacancy. Okay, all right. Well, I'm not seeing anything further, so we need to pass the motion about the additional names. Oh wait, oh, I'll go to Councillor McQueen. I'm going to need a mover and a seconder for the additional names. Councillor McQueen, go ahead. Yeah, I'm just wondering—is back when. Wondering is back when that terms of reference was changed. Possibly the deputy warden was the warden, and that may be how they had the Southgate representative at that time. I'm not sure the timing or the date of that, but anyway, that's just a comment. And I will move if you need a mover. I will make a. I will move. Thank you. I really do need a mover. Thank you. Moved by Councillor McQueen that the additional names that have offered to serve to fill the vacancies that that were identified in the. Their names to be added. We will need a second or seconded by Councillor Carleton. So it's now on the floor for discussion. Any discussion about the extra names to be added, the vacancies? Okay. In that case, all in favor, and that motion is carried. Thank goodness. Okay. All right. Thank you very much, Madam Clerk. We do not have any closed session matters. And is there any other business? Seeing no hands raised, are there any notices of motion to serve, Deputy Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden. I will be working with the Clerks Department to bring a motion to the next Council meeting that on that will reflect that on the adoption of the 2026 budget, the Budget and Finance Committee be dissolved. Thank you. Any other notices of motion? Not seeing. Not seen any. Okay, then in that case, then I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Councillor Pringle, I missed your hand the last time. I'll take you as moving, and Councillor McKay as seconding. Any discussion? All those in favor? And that is carried. Thank you.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.