Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — December 11, 2025
Hook: Candlelight Event Sold Out Despite Snow
Grey County · County Council · December 11, 2025
Summary
The County Council convened on December 11, 2025, opening with attendance call and the singing of O Canada while acknowledging traditional Saugeen Ojibwe Nation territory. Following routine approval of November minutes, councillors heard community updates before voting to conclude proceedings without further business discussion.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- O Canada: The assembly sang O Canada and acknowledged the traditional territory of the Nishnabek Nation, specifically honoring the Saugeen Ojibwe Nation to the south. The meeting confirmed attendance for most councillors while noting absences including Warden Matrasovs and Councillor Hutchinson.
- County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated November 27, 2025: Council members moved and seconded the acceptance of open session minutes, confirmed there were no closed matters or reports, then proceeded to move and carry a bylaw confirming all actions.
- News and Celebrations: The section highlights community celebrations including a sold-out Candlelight event at Gray Roots that welcomed over 2,000 people despite snow conditions. Paramedic services supported the sixth annual Global Medic Holiday Hustle by delivering 4,500 pounds of food to share and Salvation Army across Gray County.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- County Council
- Date
- December 11, 2025
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Stephanie Patterson called the meeting to order.
00:11:38 Speaker 01: I'll bring the meeting to order
00:11:39 Speaker 02: and welcome all that are here
00:11:40 Speaker 02: with us today and online. So
00:11:43 Speaker 02: if you would rise as able,
2 O Canada
The assembly sang O Canada and acknowledged the traditional territory of the Nishnabek Nation, specifically honoring the Saugeen Ojibwe Nation to the south. The meeting confirmed attendance for most councillors while noting absences including Warden Matrasovs and Councillor Hutchinson.
00:11:45 Speaker 02: we'll sing "O Canada." our home
00:11:58 Speaker 02: and native land, true patriot love
00:12:06 Speaker 02: in all of us command. With
00:12:11 Speaker 02: glowing hearts, we see thee rise,
00:12:16 Speaker 03: the true North, strong and free.
00:12:20 Speaker 03: from far and wide, O Canada,
00:12:24 Speaker 03: we stand on guard for thee.
00:12:29 Speaker 03: God keep our land, glorious and
00:12:35 Speaker 04: free. O. Canada, we stand on
00:12:44 Speaker 04: guard for thee. Thank you. Please,
00:12:50 Speaker 04: Councillor Mackie. Councillor McKay. Councillor Carleton.
00:12:56 Speaker 04: Councillor Pringle. Councillor. McQueen, we are
00:13:13 Speaker 04: expecting later this morning. Councillor
00:13:17 Speaker 04: Nielsen, glad to be here. Councillor
00:13:20 Speaker 04: Patterson, Councillor Dicker, Councillor Kentner, Councillor
00:13:23 Speaker 05: Keaveny, Councillor Body, Councillor Gregg, Deputy
00:13:27 Speaker 05: Warden Milm, Councillor Debrine, the
00:13:31 Speaker 05: Warden is attending shortly. Councillor Bourdainon,
00:13:36 Speaker 05: present. Councillor Eccles, Councilor Tom. Councillor
00:13:40 Speaker 05: Tom Hutchinson is absent today.
00:13:43 Speaker 05: Alternate Councillor Doug Hutchinson present.
00:13:47 Speaker 05: Thank you. We have all members
00:13:50 Speaker 05: in attendance today, with the exception
00:13:53 Speaker 05: of Warden Matrasovs and McQueen and
00:13:54 Speaker 05: Hutchinson. We acknowledge with respect. We
00:13:56 Speaker 05: are gathered on the traditional territory
00:14:05 Speaker 05: of the Nishnabek Nation, the people
00:14:07 Speaker 05: of the Three Fires, known as
00:14:08 Speaker 05: the Jibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi Nations.
00:14:10 Speaker 05: We give thanks to the Chippewas
00:14:12 Speaker 05: of Saugeen and Chippewas of Nawash,
00:14:15 Speaker 02: known collectively as the Saugeen Ojibwe
00:14:16 Speaker 02: Nation, the traditional keepers of these
00:14:19 Speaker 02: lands and waters since time immemorial.
00:14:21 Speaker 02: To our south lies the traditional
00:14:22 Speaker 02: territories of the Six Nations of
00:14:25 Speaker 02: the Grand River and the Haudenosaunee.
00:14:27 Speaker 02: We are dedicated to honoring Indigenous
00:14:29 Speaker 02: history and culture, and committed to
00:14:31 Speaker 02: moving forward in the spirit of
00:14:33 Speaker 02: truth, reconciliation, and friendship with all
00:14:35 Speaker 02: First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people.
00:14:38 Speaker 02: Is there any declaration? of interest
00:14:39 Speaker 02: related to any item on today's
00:14:44 Speaker 02: agenda? Not seeing any. If one
00:14:46 Speaker 02: should arise during the course of
00:14:49 Speaker 02: the meeting, you can of course
00:14:51 Speaker 02: declare it at that time. We
00:14:52 Speaker 02: have sets of minutes here from
6.a County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated November 27, 2025
Council members moved and seconded the acceptance of open session minutes, confirmed there were no closed matters or reports, then proceeded to move and carry a bylaw confirming all actions.
00:14:53 Speaker 02: November 27th, open and closed sessions.
00:14:56 Speaker 02: Someone care to move that we
00:14:59 Speaker 02: accept those minutes? Councilor Durbin, second
00:15:03 Speaker 02: by Councilor Eccles. Any discussion? All
00:15:04 Speaker 02: those in favor? That is carried.
00:15:06 Speaker 02: We don't have. any closed meeting
00:15:09 Speaker 02: matters. There are no reports. We
00:15:13 Speaker 02: have a bylaw. Oh, sorry. I
00:15:14 Speaker 02: assumed that we could do them
00:15:16 Speaker 02: all together, but we need to
00:15:22 Speaker 02: do the second, the closed minutes
00:15:23 Speaker 02: of the November 27 meeting. So
00:15:24 Speaker 02: I need a mover, counsel, Councillor
00:15:27 Speaker 02: Patterson, and Councillor Dicker. Any discussion?
00:15:29 Speaker 02: All those in favor? That is
00:15:33 Speaker 02: carried. Okay. Moving on to the
00:15:37 Speaker 02: bylaw to confirm all actions confirming
00:15:41 Speaker 02: bylaw, Councillor Mackie, seconded by Councillor
00:15:44 Speaker 02: Pringle. Any discussion? All in favor?
10 News and Celebrations
The section highlights community celebrations including a sold-out Candlelight event at Gray Roots that welcomed over 2,000 people despite snow conditions. Paramedic services supported the sixth annual Global Medic Holiday Hustle by delivering 4,500 pounds of food to share and Salvation Army across Gray County. The Cheshire Santa Claus Parade is scheduled for next Saturday at 10:30 as the season's final parade where attendees can sit on Santa's knee. A non-motorized horse-drawn parade runs through Holstein village in its 32nd year starting Saturday at one p.m., while Thornbury hosts an Old Fashioned Christmas featuring hot chocolate, candy canes, and a tree lighting walk.
00:15:47 Speaker 02: That is carried. News and celebrations.
00:15:51 Speaker 02: We'll start off with Savannah has
00:15:54 Speaker 02: some news for us this morning.
00:15:57 Speaker 02: Welcome, Savannah. Thank you very much.
00:15:59 Speaker 02: Very excited to share with you
00:16:02 Speaker 02: that last week we had our
00:16:04 Speaker 02: first sold out Morris and My
00:16:06 Speaker 02: Candlelight of 2025. and this week
00:16:07 Speaker 02: coming up, I think we're down
00:16:09 Speaker 02: to 24 tickets, which means that
00:16:11 Speaker 02: we will have welcomed more than
00:16:13 Speaker 02: 2,000 people to Gray Roots over
00:16:14 Speaker 06: those two days for Morriston by
00:16:16 Speaker 06: Candlelight. So there is still space
00:16:17 Speaker 06: if you want to to attend.
00:16:19 Speaker 06: If any of your constituents would
00:16:20 Speaker 06: like to go, but it's just
00:16:22 Speaker 06: a wonderful night. We've got beautiful
00:16:23 Speaker 06: snow, but now we'd like no
00:16:24 Speaker 06: more. So if you can all
00:16:26 Speaker 06: pray with us for that, that
00:16:27 Speaker 06: would be wonderful. And looking forward
00:16:28 Speaker 06: to the event on Saturday. Thank
00:16:29 Speaker 06: you, Savannah. That is indeed good
00:16:31 Speaker 06: news. Kevin McNab has some news
00:16:33 Speaker 06: for us, Kevin. Good morning, everyone.
00:16:37 Speaker 06: Just let you know this week,
00:16:40 Speaker 06: paramedic services and transportation services proudly
00:16:42 Speaker 07: supported a Global Medic Holiday Hustle
00:16:45 Speaker 07: for the sixth year in a
00:16:47 Speaker 08: row. This year, 4,500 pounds of
00:16:49 Speaker 08: food items were delivered to share
00:16:51 Speaker 08: and Salvation Army, helping families across
00:16:53 Speaker 08: Gray County. Since joining in 2020,
00:16:55 Speaker 08: Gray County has received over 30,000
00:16:58 Speaker 08: pounds of food through this program.
00:16:59 Speaker 08: Across Ontario, the impact is even
00:17:01 Speaker 08: bigger. In 2024, 18 emergency services
00:17:04 Speaker 08: department and over 15 community partners
00:17:07 Speaker 08: distributed over 118,000 pounds of food
00:17:09 Speaker 08: across Ontario. I just want
00:17:12 Speaker 08: to say thanks to everybody making
00:17:14 Speaker 08: it possible. Thank you, Kevin, for
00:17:15 Speaker 08: that. It is rather astounding that
00:17:18 Speaker 08: we need that support in our
00:17:20 Speaker 08: community, but we do appreciate your
00:17:23 Speaker 08: efforts to help folks out. Anyone
00:17:24 Speaker 08: else have any news celebrations? Councillor
00:17:27 Speaker 08: McKay. Hold on. And for you,
00:17:30 Speaker 08: Santa Claus Parade will be coming
00:17:41 Speaker 08: up in Cheshire next Saturday, ten
00:17:44 Speaker 09: thirty. It's the—I do believe it's
00:17:46 Speaker 09: the last parade of the season.
00:17:50 Speaker 10: So anybody's welcome to come out
00:17:52 Speaker 10: and sit on Santa's knee. Okay.
00:17:54 Speaker 10: Thank you for that. Anyone else,
00:17:56 Speaker 10: Councillor? Carlton. Thank you, Deputy Warden.
00:18:00 Speaker 10: This Sunday afternoon at two o'clock
00:18:10 Speaker 10: is the non-motorized parade in the
00:18:12 Speaker 11: village of Kemble. Everybody, welcome. Thank
00:18:15 Speaker 11: you, Sue. Councillor Debrine. Good morning,
00:18:17 Speaker 12: Deputy Warden, and and all present.
00:18:23 Speaker 12: I just wanted to remind everyone
00:18:27 Speaker 12: that the Holstein non. The Holstein
00:18:30 Speaker 12: non-motorized Santa Claus parade is being
00:18:32 Speaker 13: held on Saturday at 1 p.m.
00:18:34 Speaker 13: in the village of Holstein. It
00:18:37 Speaker 13: runs the entire length of the
00:18:38 Speaker 13: the village, and it is actually
00:18:41 Speaker 14: in its 32nd year. It held
00:18:45 Speaker 14: it was increased, so hopefully everyone
00:18:49 Speaker 14: can come out, line the streets,
00:18:52 Speaker 14: and watch all the beautiful horses
00:18:54 Speaker 14: and other animals and people. Thank
00:18:56 Speaker 14: you for that, Councillor Body. Yes,
00:19:02 Speaker 14: thank you. Christmas is happening in
00:19:08 Speaker 14: December twenty fifth and on. Sound,
00:19:11 Speaker 14: thanks. Thanks for that, Captain. Anyone
00:19:19 Speaker 14: else? Okay. Oh, wait, we got
00:19:24 Speaker 14: somebody, Councillor Bordignon. Thank you, Deputy
00:19:27 Speaker 14: Warden, and. we're going to take
00:19:29 Speaker 15: a cue from our neighbors to
00:19:30 Speaker 15: the east and have Christmas on
00:19:32 Speaker 15: December 25th as well. But before
00:19:33 Speaker 15: that, we do have Old Fashioned
00:19:35 Speaker 15: Christmas in the town of Thornbury
00:19:36 Speaker 15: Saturday. We have a hot chocolate
00:19:39 Speaker 15: for everybody and candy canes, and
00:19:40 Speaker 15: we will light the tree at
00:19:43 Speaker 16: Town Hall, and then we'll close
00:19:44 Speaker 16: Brew Street and and enjoy a
00:19:45 Speaker 16: walk through with all the merchants
00:19:47 Speaker 16: on a on a pedestrian area.
00:19:49 Speaker 16: So everybody's looking forward to that.
00:19:50 Speaker 16: It's an annual tradition. Thank you.
00:19:52 Speaker 16: Thank you, Councilor Bordignon, for that.
00:19:55 Speaker 16: Will you be attending in person?
00:19:57 Speaker 16: or otherwise? Always in person. Always
00:19:59 Speaker 02: in person. I haven't heard you
00:20:04 Speaker 02: say that for a long time.
11 Adjournment
Councilor Kevney and Councilor Patterson voted to carry a motion to adjourn.
00:20:06 Speaker 02: Anyone else? Okay. With that, we'll
00:20:10 Speaker 02: ask for a motion to adjourn.
00:20:15 Speaker 02: Councilor Kevney, Councilor Patterson, all those
00:20:18 Speaker 02: in favor? That is carried. We'll
00:20:21 Speaker 02: just take a moment to switch
00:20:24 Speaker 02: over to our committee. The whole.
00:20:25 Speaker 02: Good morning, County Council. Thank you
00:21:13 Speaker 02: very much, Deputy Warden, for stepping
00:21:15 Speaker 02: in for our council meeting. We
00:21:17 Speaker 02: will now begin our committee, the
00:21:18 Speaker 02: whole meeting, of December eleventh, twenty
00:21:20 Speaker 17: twenty-five. At this point in time,
00:21:22 Speaker 17: we'll. put a call out for
00:21:24 Speaker 17: any declarations of interest for this
00:21:25 Speaker 17: agenda, and seeing none online or
00:21:28 Speaker 17: here in the chamber, we will
00:21:30 Speaker 17: move on to business arising from
00:21:31 Speaker 17: minutes. And item three a, it's
00:21:35 Speaker 17: recommended that the evaluation of countywide
00:21:37 Speaker 17: library services be considered by the
00:21:39 Speaker 17: joint municipal services committee. So this
00:21:41 Speaker 17: is a notice motion from Councillor
00:21:43 Speaker 17: Greg. So Councillor Greg, I, do
00:21:45 Speaker 17: you have more wording to share?
00:21:51 Speaker 17: to move before I look for
00:21:52 Speaker 17: a seconder, or is it the
00:21:53 Speaker 17: way that it's been published? Okay,
00:21:55 Speaker 17: so as published, so I'll need
00:21:58 Speaker 17: a seconder for us to get
00:21:59 Speaker 17: it on the floor for discussion.
00:22:00 Speaker 17: I see it seconded by Councillor
00:22:01 Speaker 17: Mackie. It's now on the floor
00:22:03 Speaker 17: for discussion. I'll go to the
00:22:04 Speaker 17: mover to begin the discussion, and
00:22:06 Speaker 17: then I'll look for other hands.
00:22:07 Speaker 17: Thank you, Warden, and just a
00:22:08 Speaker 17: couple quick comments to this item,
00:22:13 Speaker 17: which I will just read so
00:22:16 Speaker 17: that you know it's on the.
00:22:18 Speaker 17: audio, but that the evaluation of
00:22:20 Speaker 17: countywide library services be considered by
00:22:22 Speaker 17: the joint municipal services committee. Why
00:22:24 Speaker 17: I think this is important is
00:22:27 Speaker 17: in the last election, our current
00:22:28 Speaker 18: board chair acknowledged during an all-candidates
00:22:31 Speaker 18: debate the significant challenges in front
00:22:35 Speaker 18: of us with tax levels
00:22:39 Speaker 18: in our municipality, and to the
00:22:41 Speaker 18: tune of wanting to create a
00:22:45 Speaker 18: committee to look at. means and
00:22:47 Speaker 18: ways of lowering the tax levels
00:22:50 Speaker 18: for our residents. So when I
00:22:51 Speaker 18: see this year that the budget
00:22:55 Speaker 18: ask was originally around eleven percent,
00:22:56 Speaker 18: I think I'm recognizing that there
00:23:00 Speaker 18: is a significant fundamental challenge challenge
00:23:03 Speaker 18: in today's economic times for libraries
00:23:06 Speaker 18: to be able to monitor and
00:23:09 Speaker 18: maintain budget increases that are commensurate
00:23:10 Speaker 18: with levels of inflation in the
00:23:14 Speaker 18: community. Of inflation in the communities,
00:23:17 Speaker 18: so I did get looking through
00:23:18 Speaker 18: Gray County, 2024 North Gray Public
00:23:21 Speaker 18: Library total expense expenses are 2.143
00:23:26 Speaker 18: million dollars, Mefford 1.113 million dollars.
00:23:31 Speaker 18: However, that is not net of
00:23:33 Speaker 18: 152 thousand, which is part of
00:23:40 Speaker 18: the On Sound Library contract. Hanover
00:23:42 Speaker 18: 722 thousand. Twenty-two thousand West Gray,
00:23:46 Speaker 18: five hundred eighty-two thousand Southgate, four
00:23:49 Speaker 18: hundred seventy-one point eight thousand Gray
00:23:53 Speaker 18: Highlands, seven hundred forty-one thousand dollars.
00:23:54 Speaker 18: Town of Blue Mountains, one point
00:23:57 Speaker 18: one seven six million dollars. Cumulatively,
00:24:00 Speaker 18: this to the Gray County taxpayers
00:24:03 Speaker 18: is seven six point seven six
00:24:06 Speaker 18: million seven hundred ninety-eight thousand one
00:24:09 Speaker 18: hundred ninety-six dollars. In two thousand
00:24:12 Speaker 18: twenty-four, in budget room. for the
00:24:15 Speaker 18: provision of library services across the
00:24:17 Speaker 18: county to our residents, as we
00:24:19 Speaker 18: know, Bruce County, right next door,
00:24:22 Speaker 18: has a countywide library system. Their
00:24:27 Speaker 18: total 2024 budget line item was
00:24:31 Speaker 18: three million seven hundred forty-two thousand
00:24:33 Speaker 18: dollars, three million seven hundred forty-two
00:24:36 Speaker 18: thousand six hundred ninety-four dollars. That
00:24:41 Speaker 18: is a big difference between Gray.
00:24:43 Speaker 18: County's cumulative total of six point
00:24:45 Speaker 18: seven nine eight million and the
00:24:48 Speaker 18: two thousand twenty four cumulative total
00:24:50 Speaker 18: in Bruce County for service provision
00:24:52 Speaker 18: of three point seven four two
00:24:54 Speaker 18: million dollars. So I think it
00:24:57 Speaker 18: does behoove us around this table
00:24:59 Speaker 18: to have our Joint Municipal Services
00:25:02 Speaker 18: Committee look at this item, see
00:25:05 Speaker 18: if there is a possibility of
00:25:08 Speaker 18: moving forward in a more partnership
00:25:11 Speaker 18: model, as opposed to the more
00:25:16 Speaker 18: isolated model that we're currently deploying,
00:25:19 Speaker 18: because as those numbers would indicate
00:25:21 Speaker 18: on the surface, we are significantly
00:25:23 Speaker 18: above Bruce County's cost of service
00:25:27 Speaker 18: provision for library services. Thank you.
00:25:29 Speaker 18: Okay, thank you for that introduction.
00:25:33 Speaker 18: I will look around the room
00:25:34 Speaker 18: for hands. I'll begin with Councillor
00:25:35 Speaker 19: Borden online. Thank you, Madam Warden,
00:25:38 Speaker 20: through you, and thank you. for
00:25:40 Speaker 20: the notice of motion. Just in
00:25:42 Speaker 20: relation to the, I think it's
00:25:44 Speaker 21: a very good idea. Looking at
00:25:46 Speaker 16: this, my question is: If Councillor
00:25:48 Speaker 16: Greg, through the Municipal Act, as
00:25:51 Speaker 16: you know, the funding model is
00:25:53 Speaker 16: set out pretty clearly for municipalities
00:25:54 Speaker 16: funding libraries at at the local
00:25:58 Speaker 16: level. Have we looked into that
00:26:01 Speaker 16: as well, from a regional perspective?
00:26:09 Speaker 16: Okay, so I think the question
00:26:10 Speaker 16: is directed to the mover. I
00:26:14 Speaker 16: have not personally looked into that
00:26:16 Speaker 16: and the opportunities that may lay
00:26:18 Speaker 16: within. That would be something that
00:26:20 Speaker 16: I would hope would be flushed
00:26:21 Speaker 16: out during the process of the
00:26:23 Speaker 16: Services Committee evaluating it. Thank you.
00:26:30 Speaker 16: Okay, so I don't see any
00:26:31 Speaker 16: further hands online. I'll look around
00:26:33 Speaker 16: the room, and I see Councillor
00:26:35 Speaker 22: Eccles. Thank you. Well, I still
00:26:40 Speaker 20: have the scars from the last
00:26:41 Speaker 20: time that I suggested this, and
00:26:43 Speaker 20: that's got to be 15 years
00:26:45 Speaker 23: ago. Maybe we should have a
00:26:53 Speaker 23: county library system, and then somebody
00:26:54 Speaker 23: could read the code of conduct.
00:27:02 Speaker 23: Yeah. I'm not as concerned about
00:27:10 Speaker 23: the dollars that are in the
00:27:12 Speaker 23: library system at the present moment.
00:27:15 Speaker 23: Some 15 or more years ago,
00:27:16 Speaker 23: when I first suggested this, and
00:27:19 Speaker 24: it died rather quickly. It was
00:27:23 Speaker 24: around our county neighbors. Wellington County
00:27:27 Speaker 24: has a library system. Simcoe County,
00:27:30 Speaker 24: I believe, has a library system.
00:27:32 Speaker 24: I'm not sure about Dufferin. I
00:27:34 Speaker 24: believe Huron Valley City was there,
00:27:38 Speaker 24: one of our neighbors as well,
00:27:41 Speaker 24: too. And where it came from
00:27:42 Speaker 24: at that point in time was
00:27:44 Speaker 24: access to some of the individuals
00:27:47 Speaker 24: in the community of West Grey
00:27:50 Speaker 24: that lived closer to some of
00:27:51 Speaker 24: those boundaries. And we couldn't get
00:27:53 Speaker 24: an agreement with those two, at
00:27:57 Speaker 24: least two counties, to talk about.
00:28:00 Speaker 24: shared library service, as we were
00:28:03 Speaker 24: a lower tier service, and they
00:28:06 Speaker 24: were an upper tier, and they
00:28:08 Speaker 24: will not talk to a lower
00:28:10 Speaker 24: tier service. They weren't going to
00:28:12 Speaker 24: enter into a partnership. It still
00:28:14 Speaker 24: stands that way this today. So
00:28:17 Speaker 24: for that reason, to be able
00:28:20 Speaker 24: to work with our partners, not
00:28:23 Speaker 24: about as much about the dollar
00:28:25 Speaker 24: factor, but it is working and
00:28:27 Speaker 24: making access to libraries. by and
00:28:29 Speaker 24: for our community, that I would
00:28:32 Speaker 24: like to see this go forward
00:28:36 Speaker 24: and see what we can do
00:28:38 Speaker 24: with it. I will be supporting
00:28:39 Speaker 24: the motion. Okay, thank you. I
00:28:42 Speaker 24: can clarify that Simcoe County is
00:28:45 Speaker 24: not city, not county wide; it
00:28:47 Speaker 24: is lower tier, and we'll go
00:28:49 Speaker 24: to Councillor Nielsen online. Just a.
00:28:51 Speaker 24: Just unmute. Can you hear me
00:28:59 Speaker 24: now? Yes, we can. Thank you.
00:29:05 Speaker 24: My apologies for Microsoft. Just a
00:29:06 Speaker 24: quick question: If staff have a
00:29:08 Speaker 25: general idea, we have two hundred
00:29:10 Speaker 26: and fifty thousand dollars in the
00:29:11 Speaker 27: budget to do a study on
00:29:12 Speaker 27: garbage concepts. Is there an idea
00:29:15 Speaker 27: of what a study would cost
00:29:18 Speaker 27: to do this to carry through
00:29:19 Speaker 27: with this motion? Okay, we'll go
00:29:21 Speaker 27: to the CAO. Through you, Warden.
00:29:26 Speaker 27: Thank you for that question, Councilor
00:29:30 Speaker 27: Nielsen. I I do want to
00:29:32 Speaker 27: note that, and as as Councilor
00:29:34 Speaker 27: Eccles alluded to this, this this
00:29:36 Speaker 28: was reviewed back about twelve years
00:29:40 Speaker 28: ago, thirteen years ago. A report
00:29:43 Speaker 28: was brought forward in 2014, looking
00:29:44 Speaker 28: at at at this. At that
00:29:50 Speaker 28: time, former CEO Lance Thurston went
00:29:52 Speaker 28: through and did that that review.
00:29:55 Speaker 28: Followed. what what was called the
00:29:59 Speaker 28: collaborative decision making framework, and followed
00:30:01 Speaker 28: those steps. Did some analysis on
00:30:04 Speaker 28: the on the services at that
00:30:05 Speaker 28: time, and explored alternative models. So
00:30:09 Speaker 28: we do have some background information
00:30:10 Speaker 28: based on that previous review, recognizing
00:30:13 Speaker 28: it is about twelve thirteen years
00:30:15 Speaker 28: old. But there there are some
00:30:17 Speaker 28: findings that that came out of
00:30:18 Speaker 28: that that that we actually included
00:30:23 Speaker 28: that as part of our initial.
00:30:26 Speaker 28: report to the Joint Missile Services
00:30:28 Speaker 28: Committee, just as a bit of
00:30:29 Speaker 28: a framework in terms of what
00:30:31 Speaker 28: what services have been investigated and
00:30:33 Speaker 28: reviewed in the past, and again,
00:30:36 Speaker 28: staff will of course take direction
00:30:39 Speaker 28: from council regarding whether you want
00:30:42 Speaker 28: to review this matter further. However,
00:30:45 Speaker 28: similar to I think Councillor Nielsen's
00:30:48 Speaker 28: question in terms of the regional
00:30:51 Speaker 28: waste, based on the direction that's
00:30:52 Speaker 28: been provided by Joint Missile Services
00:30:54 Speaker 28: Committee. By Joint Mental Services Committee
00:30:56 Speaker 28: and supported by Council so far,
00:30:58 Speaker 28: there's three priority areas that that
00:31:00 Speaker 28: staff have been asked to to
00:31:02 Speaker 28: review, and and those are already
00:31:05 Speaker 28: in the those priority topics. So
00:31:08 Speaker 28: just cognizant in terms of of
00:31:10 Speaker 28: you know overall resources and capacity,
00:31:12 Speaker 28: whether or not this is something
00:31:14 Speaker 28: that staff could could review. If
00:31:16 Speaker 28: that's the case, it might take
00:31:18 Speaker 28: some time to review that topic,
00:31:21 Speaker 28: given the current workload and capacity.
00:31:23 Speaker 28: At the same time. you know
00:31:25 Speaker 28: there could be a consultant that's
00:31:27 Speaker 28: provided to to support this review.
00:31:28 Speaker 28: I don't know what the cost
00:31:31 Speaker 28: of that would be. We don't
00:31:33 Speaker 28: have any indicators in front of
00:31:34 Speaker 28: me at this point in time
00:31:35 Speaker 28: in terms of what that would
00:31:37 Speaker 28: look like. We'd be happy to
00:31:39 Speaker 28: to research that if the direction
00:31:40 Speaker 28: from council is to support this
00:31:42 Speaker 28: motion. We could bring that information
00:31:43 Speaker 28: back to the Joint Municipal Services
00:31:46 Speaker 28: Committee so they could have that
00:31:47 Speaker 28: that information. But this stage, I
00:31:50 Speaker 28: don't know what a consultant supported
00:31:53 Speaker 28: review would look like in terms
00:31:54 Speaker 28: of cost. Okay, thank you. Just
00:31:55 Speaker 28: before we go on to the
00:31:58 Speaker 28: next hand up, then. So for
00:31:59 Speaker 28: clarification, CAO, it should this motion
00:32:01 Speaker 29: pass the way that it is.
00:32:03 Speaker 29: You've identified that there that the
00:32:05 Speaker 29: Joint Services Committee has already identified
00:32:07 Speaker 29: three priorities. We we as a
00:32:09 Speaker 29: council have already supported putting some
00:32:10 Speaker 29: dollars behind that. So even if
00:32:13 Speaker 29: it were to be staff time,
00:32:14 Speaker 29: what would happen with this action
00:32:16 Speaker 29: if this is the direction that
00:32:17 Speaker 29: we provide the way that the
00:32:19 Speaker 29: notice of motion is written? Does
00:32:20 Speaker 29: that mean that it automates Does
00:32:22 Speaker 29: that mean that it automatically falls
00:32:23 Speaker 29: to the bottom of that queue
00:32:26 Speaker 29: and it becomes the fourth spot,
00:32:27 Speaker 29: or does the Joint Services Committee
00:32:29 Speaker 29: have some leverage to decide how
00:32:34 Speaker 29: they would like to allocate the
00:32:36 Speaker 29: time, staff time, as well as
00:32:38 Speaker 29: resources? Thank you, Gordon. A great
00:32:41 Speaker 29: question. With respect to to how
00:32:43 Speaker 28: it could play out if if
00:32:44 Speaker 28: Council supports this motion, how I
00:32:46 Speaker 28: would envision this at this stage
00:32:48 Speaker 28: is that staff would bring an
00:32:50 Speaker 28: initial report forward to the Joint
00:32:53 Speaker 28: Missile Service Committee based on. what
00:32:55 Speaker 28: was previously reviewed as part of
00:33:00 Speaker 28: the library services review, identifying what
00:33:02 Speaker 28: information was provided at that time
00:33:05 Speaker 28: and and and opportunities for efficiencies
00:33:07 Speaker 28: that were were identified and flagged
00:33:08 Speaker 28: at that time, but recommending that
00:33:11 Speaker 28: that rather than a countywide system
00:33:13 Speaker 28: was the end result of that
00:33:15 Speaker 28: study was to for the library
00:33:19 Speaker 28: boards to work together not only
00:33:20 Speaker 28: within the within within Gray County
00:33:22 Speaker 28: but the neighboring counties. and municipalities
00:33:25 Speaker 28: as well, so that was what
00:33:27 Speaker 28: was the end result in the
00:33:30 Speaker 28: recommendations at that stage. In terms
00:33:32 Speaker 28: of, and so we would bring
00:33:33 Speaker 28: that initial report forward. Obviously, further
00:33:35 Speaker 28: discussion today. In terms of, we're
00:33:38 Speaker 28: taking notes as as we speak.
00:33:41 Speaker 28: If it does get support, we
00:33:43 Speaker 28: would bring back further information for
00:33:44 Speaker 28: joint messrs to consider. That again,
00:33:47 Speaker 28: that committee makes recommendations to this
00:33:49 Speaker 28: council, so it would come back
00:33:51 Speaker 28: to this council in terms. of
00:33:53 Speaker 28: that review or that initial report,
00:33:55 Speaker 28: and and then seeking further council
00:33:57 Speaker 28: direction in terms of those pieces.
00:34:00 Speaker 28: So whether it's a consultant supported
00:34:02 Speaker 28: review and what the cost would
00:34:05 Speaker 28: be for that, or staff review
00:34:07 Speaker 28: and and rejuggling of priorities based
00:34:10 Speaker 28: on what the direction's been provided
00:34:11 Speaker 28: by council today, that are those
00:34:13 Speaker 28: are all options, I guess, that
00:34:16 Speaker 28: can be unpacked by first considered
00:34:18 Speaker 28: by joint municipal service committee, but
00:34:21 Speaker 28: then ultimately approved and supported by
00:34:23 Speaker 28: council. Okay, thank you very much
00:34:26 Speaker 28: for that clarification on procedure. We'll
00:34:29 Speaker 30: go to Councilor McQueen online. Good
00:34:32 Speaker 30: morning, Madam Warden, and good morning,
00:34:33 Speaker 30: County Council. A couple questions. Should
00:34:34 Speaker 30: we not do maybe certainly going
00:34:36 Speaker 30: back to the committee? I would
00:34:38 Speaker 30: see that they'd have further discussion,
00:34:41 Speaker 30: but would we not do a
00:34:42 Speaker 30: simple poll to see what the
00:34:46 Speaker 30: lower tier municipalities are interested in
00:34:48 Speaker 30: doing? I know that for us
00:34:52 Speaker 30: in Grey Highlands, we have. For
00:34:54 Speaker 30: us in Grayhavens, we have three
00:34:55 Speaker 30: different branches service our municipality, and
00:34:56 Speaker 30: so I don't know. I think
00:34:58 Speaker 30: in the past, maybe our CEO
00:34:59 Speaker 30: maybe have some information here as
00:35:00 Speaker 30: well. But I think the last
00:35:02 Speaker 30: time we went through this, they
00:35:04 Speaker 30: did get circulated to the lower
00:35:06 Speaker 30: tiers, and some were maybe in,
00:35:09 Speaker 30: and some were maybe out. But
00:35:11 Speaker 30: if you don't have a full
00:35:13 Speaker 30: buy-in from the lower tier, I
00:35:15 Speaker 30: know it's a budgetary item from
00:35:18 Speaker 30: the local municipality. Any thoughts on
00:35:21 Speaker 30: that? Like. like if there's if
00:35:22 Speaker 30: there's a a great interest in
00:35:23 Speaker 30: the lower tier, then. But if
00:35:24 Speaker 30: there isn't, I don't know how
00:35:26 Speaker 30: how far you want to you
00:35:28 Speaker 30: know. Have that discussion if the
00:35:31 Speaker 30: if if you don't have the
00:35:34 Speaker 30: buy-in from and maybe you do,
00:35:35 Speaker 30: but I think you should have
00:35:37 Speaker 30: that opportunity to maybe check that
00:35:38 Speaker 30: out. Thank you. Okay, I'll look
00:35:40 Speaker 28: to the CAO for a comment
00:35:42 Speaker 28: on that. Through you, Warden, and
00:35:45 Speaker 28: again, if this if this
00:35:48 Speaker 28: motion gets supported, that I would
00:35:51 Speaker 28: assume we'd be part of. the
00:35:53 Speaker 28: review. Is is having further discussions
00:35:55 Speaker 28: with each of the library managers,
00:35:58 Speaker 28: each of the the library boards,
00:36:01 Speaker 28: our our neighboring municipalities, neighboring counties,
00:36:03 Speaker 28: looking at what models that they
00:36:05 Speaker 28: have. So that would be part
00:36:07 Speaker 28: of the the potential review of
00:36:11 Speaker 28: of looking at that, and then
00:36:13 Speaker 28: seeing if there's there's feedback from
00:36:14 Speaker 28: each of the municipalities in terms
00:36:16 Speaker 28: of interest, in terms of again
00:36:20 Speaker 28: whether the option is to join
00:36:21 Speaker 28: a. county-wide library service model, or
00:36:24 Speaker 28: or if there's other opportunities or
00:36:26 Speaker 31: options, and or in terms of
00:36:28 Speaker 31: creating some efficiencies amongst amongst the
00:36:31 Speaker 31: library boards in terms of shared
00:36:33 Speaker 31: service. Hello, Councillor McQueen. Yes, thank
00:36:36 Speaker 31: you for that, and that's good
00:36:39 Speaker 32: information. I think also there's probably
00:36:42 Speaker 32: a bit of a science behind
00:36:44 Speaker 32: each branch of the each library
00:36:46 Speaker 32: branch or library location that services
00:36:49 Speaker 32: a certain area, because I know
00:36:51 Speaker 32: we. in Grey Highlands certainly service
00:36:53 Speaker 32: provide service for West Grey and
00:36:55 Speaker 32: Chatsworth, along with the town of
00:36:56 Speaker 32: Collingwood provides service for certain residents
00:36:58 Speaker 32: in Grey Highlands. So we do
00:36:59 Speaker 32: have some workings that do work
00:37:01 Speaker 32: with other libraries and other municipalities
00:37:02 Speaker 32: as well. So you know, I
00:37:04 Speaker 32: don't know in the sense of
00:37:06 Speaker 32: that report if it would reflect
00:37:07 Speaker 32: on the level of service and
00:37:11 Speaker 32: the area that it's serving. I
00:37:12 Speaker 32: think that you need to maybe
00:37:14 Speaker 32: identify where all the libraries are
00:37:16 Speaker 29: as well to. maybe look at
00:37:18 Speaker 29: what level service is happening throughout
00:37:20 Speaker 29: the county. Anyway, thank you. Okay,
00:37:22 Speaker 29: thank you. And I would add
00:37:24 Speaker 29: to the comments of Councilor Queen
00:37:27 Speaker 29: as well. It's not just the
00:37:28 Speaker 29: geography and the the accessibility of
00:37:30 Speaker 29: how people can get to resources
00:37:32 Speaker 29: and branches, but it's also the
00:37:34 Speaker 29: nature of each of our each
00:37:35 Speaker 29: of the nine municipalities' library services.
00:37:36 Speaker 29: In the example of the Town
00:37:38 Speaker 29: of Blue Mountains, it's a glam,
00:37:39 Speaker 29: it's a gallery library, archive, and
00:37:43 Speaker 29: museum, all governed under. the one
00:37:44 Speaker 29: thing, so that may not be
00:37:46 Speaker 29: the same in the case of
00:37:47 Speaker 29: all of the municipalities. So there
00:37:49 Speaker 29: would have to be some clarification
00:37:50 Speaker 29: on what was meant by library
00:37:51 Speaker 29: services. Okay, all right. So I
00:37:53 Speaker 29: don't see any further hands online.
00:37:56 Speaker 29: I don't see any hands around
00:37:58 Speaker 29: the room. So looks like we're
00:38:00 Speaker 29: ready to call for the vote.
00:38:06 Speaker 29: So the vote is to consider
00:38:08 Speaker 29: whether or not that the evaluation
00:38:09 Speaker 29: of the countywide library services should
00:38:11 Speaker 29: be considered by the joint municipal
00:38:12 Speaker 29: services committee. I will call the
00:38:14 Speaker 29: vote. All those in favor. Okay,
00:38:16 Speaker 29: and that. All right. Thank you
00:38:18 Speaker 29: very much. And we will move
00:38:22 Speaker 29: on. We have one delegation today,
00:38:26 Speaker 29: but we do actually have three
00:38:29 Speaker 29: visitors in order to support that
00:38:31 Speaker 29: delegation. So at this point in
00:38:35 Speaker 29: time, we'll direct our attention online
00:38:39 Speaker 29: because the presenters are there. And
00:38:40 Speaker 29: welcome, Mr. Maurice Boisette, and also
00:38:42 Speaker 29: Chuck Bouillon, and also Ken Brown.
00:38:45 Speaker 29: Oh, and I understand, Mr. Voisin,
00:38:50 Speaker 29: you'll be doing the presenting. Yes,
00:38:52 Speaker 29: yes. Okay, okay. Sorry, I'm being
00:38:53 Speaker 29: somebody's just. I, I, I'm, I'm
00:38:54 Speaker 29: wanting to call you, Monsieur Voisin,
00:38:55 Speaker 29: but I'm understanding is it is
00:38:57 Speaker 29: is a Voisin instead. Yes, yeah,
00:39:00 Speaker 29: that's fine. All right, so Mr.
00:39:02 Speaker 29: Voisin, welcome, and you have the
00:39:03 Speaker 29: floor. I know that you have
00:39:06 Speaker 29: your colleagues with you, and what
00:39:08 Speaker 29: we'll do is we'll listen to
00:39:10 Speaker 29: your presentation, and then I'll put
00:39:12 Speaker 33: it out for questions. for for
00:39:18 Speaker 33: clarification coming from council members and
00:39:19 Speaker 33: direct them to you. Thank you
00:39:23 Speaker 33: very much. Good morning and welcome,
00:39:24 Speaker 20: and thank you for your time
00:39:32 Speaker 20: this morning. So I'm I've tried
00:39:33 Speaker 20: to start to share my screen.
00:39:34 Speaker 20: Can you see that? No, we
00:39:36 Speaker 20: just see yourself at the moment.
00:39:38 Speaker 20: I'll just look. Okay. The clerk.
00:39:39 Speaker 20: Okay. The clerk is making an
00:39:41 Speaker 20: adjustment. Just give us a moment.
00:39:44 Speaker 20: Sure. Okay, so our communication staff
00:39:47 Speaker 20: are going to be sharing it
00:39:48 Speaker 20: from their stations. So then,
00:39:52 Speaker 20: when you're ready for the next
00:39:55 Speaker 33: slide, you can just say "next
00:39:57 Speaker 33: slide," and we'll advance it for
00:39:59 Speaker 33: you. Excellent. Thanks very much. So,
00:40:02 Speaker 33: wanted to talk about five things
00:40:04 Speaker 33: this morning. First of all, the
00:40:06 Speaker 33: agenda—it's a once-in-a-generation and all opportunity
00:40:08 Speaker 33: for Saugeen Hospice and Grey County.
00:40:11 Speaker 33: The need for Saugeen Hospice, because
00:40:17 Speaker 33: the rationale for that, what benefits
00:40:20 Speaker 33: there are to the community, and
00:40:22 Speaker 33: just the whole aspect of community
00:40:25 Speaker 33: leadership and the benefits to Grey
00:40:27 Speaker 33: and Bruce County Councils, and finally
00:40:30 Speaker 33: a call to action. So, next
00:40:32 Speaker 33: slide, please. So, we're asking Grey
00:40:34 Speaker 33: County's consideration, along with Bruce County,
00:40:37 Speaker 33: to for exclusive naming rights for
00:40:40 Speaker 33: the Family Reflection Room of Reflection
00:40:43 Speaker 33: room available for three hundred and
00:40:46 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollars combined for the
00:40:48 Speaker 33: two county councils for fifteen years.
00:40:51 Speaker 33: That's renewable. The family reflection room
00:40:56 Speaker 33: will serve as a comforting space
00:40:59 Speaker 33: for families, and it'll promote some
00:41:02 Speaker 33: some regional pride. It's basically the
00:41:04 Speaker 33: first room that you'll recognize when
00:41:09 Speaker 33: you come in, and we think
00:41:10 Speaker 33: it'll be quite well utilized. And
00:41:12 Speaker 33: next slide, please. This is a
00:41:15 Speaker 33: location of the of the family
00:41:17 Speaker 33: reflection room. So it is fairly
00:41:19 Speaker 33: central in the in the building
00:41:21 Speaker 33: at the new Sogin Hospice. And
00:41:25 Speaker 33: next slide, please. And this is
00:41:30 Speaker 33: the scene from the back. So
00:41:33 Speaker 33: all of the rooms look out
00:41:35 Speaker 33: to a very picturesque view of
00:41:37 Speaker 33: of an open field behind them,
00:41:39 Speaker 33: and the family reflection room is
00:41:42 Speaker 33: circled in green there. on your
00:41:44 Speaker 33: on your screen, and next slide,
00:41:47 Speaker 33: please. So our statistics are based
00:41:49 Speaker 33: on that the number of deaths
00:41:51 Speaker 33: in Graham Bruce annualized is around
00:41:53 Speaker 33: eighteen hundred people a year. That
00:41:55 Speaker 33: impacts close to nine thousand people.
00:41:58 Speaker 33: We do have an aging population,
00:42:00 Speaker 33: and according to Ontario Health West,
00:42:01 Speaker 33: over people over sixty five in
00:42:03 Speaker 33: ten years will make Five and
00:42:07 Speaker 33: ten years will make up more
00:42:11 Speaker 33: than one third of the populations
00:42:13 Speaker 33: in Grey and Bruce counties, which
00:42:15 Speaker 33: could result in lots of caregiver
00:42:18 Speaker 33: burnout, and certainly it's on the
00:42:22 Speaker 33: rise. So today in Grey Bruce,
00:42:24 Speaker 33: just to give you a snapshot,
00:42:28 Speaker 33: there's 12 active hospice residents beds
00:42:30 Speaker 33: for our population of about 175,000
00:42:32 Speaker 33: people, and based on at the
00:42:35 Speaker 33: bottom of the screen there, based
00:42:37 Speaker 33: on the 2024 Ontario Health West
00:42:40 Speaker 33: needs analysis. Grey Bruce requires 18
00:42:43 Speaker 33: hospice residence beds, so that's where
00:42:45 Speaker 33: the six beds comes from proposed
00:42:47 Speaker 33: for Saugeen Hospice. So the Saugeen
00:42:50 Speaker 33: Hospice will fill a critical gap
00:42:53 Speaker 33: of these six hospice residence beds
00:42:56 Speaker 33: that's been identified by Ontario Health
00:42:58 Speaker 33: West as that. The other benefits,
00:43:00 Speaker 33: and you can go to the
00:43:03 Speaker 33: next slide, please. You know, the
00:43:05 Speaker 33: it's closer to home. It fills
00:43:07 Speaker 33: that. critical gap of six additional
00:43:09 Speaker 33: hospice residence beds needed in Southern
00:43:12 Speaker 33: Gray Bruce. So closer to family,
00:43:14 Speaker 33: more time together, less travel for
00:43:17 Speaker 33: families. They mean means they can
00:43:20 Speaker 33: visit more often, stay longer without
00:43:21 Speaker 33: the strain of of lengthy commutes.
00:43:24 Speaker 33: You can see the how it
00:43:26 Speaker 33: kind of completes the picture of
00:43:31 Speaker 33: Gray Bruce at the the lower
00:43:33 Speaker 33: part of Gray and Bruce counties,
00:43:37 Speaker 33: and also closer to local community
00:43:45 Speaker 33: support. for that stronger emotional support
00:43:45 Speaker 33: for people that are transitioning, and
00:43:49 Speaker 33: the residents and their families can
00:43:52 Speaker 33: remain connected. Their faith groups can
00:43:54 Speaker 33: continue to visit them, and local
00:43:58 Speaker 33: counselors, while accessing Saugeen Hospice in
00:44:00 Speaker 33: dedicated grief and bereavement services. So
00:44:04 Speaker 33: it's really a dedicated service that
00:44:05 Speaker 33: that we're proposing. And next slide,
00:44:06 Speaker 33: please. So just to give you
00:44:10 Speaker 33: an idea, so Sogin Hospice was
00:44:13 Speaker 33: incorporated in 2021. It's a not-for-profit
00:44:17 Speaker 33: community corporation. The plan is to
00:44:22 Speaker 33: build a freestanding six-bed hospice in
00:44:24 Speaker 33: Southern Bruce County and East Ridge
00:44:28 Speaker 33: Park in Walkerton. Brockton has donated
00:44:31 Speaker 33: three acres of land, and that's
00:44:34 Speaker 33: the picture you see at the
00:44:35 Speaker 33: top of the of the screen.
00:44:38 Speaker 33: And we're anticipating welcoming. our first
00:44:40 Speaker 33: resident in the summer of 2028.
00:44:43 Speaker 33: So, and next slide, please. So
00:44:47 Speaker 33: this is kind of a aerial
00:44:49 Speaker 33: view of the of the of
00:44:50 Speaker 33: the Saugeen Hospice. You can see
00:44:53 Speaker 33: that we've incorporated a number of
00:44:55 Speaker 33: parking spaces on it. We hope
00:44:58 Speaker 33: that it becomes a training center.
00:45:00 Speaker 33: We hope that there are lots
00:45:01 Speaker 33: of visitors. We Lots of visitors.
00:45:05 Speaker 33: We've also considered our Amish and
00:45:07 Speaker 33: Mennonite neighbors, and there's three horse
00:45:11 Speaker 33: tie-ups in the at the edge
00:45:13 Speaker 33: of the parking lot for for
00:45:15 Speaker 33: their convenience. And and like I
00:45:16 Speaker 33: said, the the building, all of
00:45:18 Speaker 33: the rooms face a field at
00:45:20 Speaker 33: the back, so that that would
00:45:22 Speaker 33: be the scene when they would
00:45:25 Speaker 33: look out their their windows and
00:45:30 Speaker 33: their patios. There, we also have
00:45:35 Speaker 33: cuddle beds in the plan. so
00:45:37 Speaker 33: that individuals that are that are
00:45:39 Speaker 33: residents there can go out
00:45:42 Speaker 33: with the bed. It'll pass through
00:45:44 Speaker 33: the patio doors, and they can
00:45:46 Speaker 33: spend time on the patio to
00:45:48 Speaker 33: enjoy the sunshine and the view
00:45:49 Speaker 33: with their family members or their
00:45:51 Speaker 33: treasured pet, whatever whatever they desire.
00:45:56 Speaker 33: And next slide, please. So this
00:45:59 Speaker 33: is the opportunity, the the call
00:46:02 Speaker 33: to action. a three hundred and
00:46:03 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollar investment secures exclusive
00:46:05 Speaker 33: naming rights for the family reflection
00:46:08 Speaker 33: room for fifteen years. You can
00:46:17 Speaker 33: see to the left there that
00:46:19 Speaker 33: that they would be welcomed. That
00:46:20 Speaker 33: this was sponsored by Gray and
00:46:23 Speaker 33: Bruce County Councils, so high visibility,
00:46:26 Speaker 33: lots of media coverage as well
00:46:31 Speaker 33: as well as you know newsletters
00:46:33 Speaker 33: and Gray County and Bruce County
00:46:35 Speaker 33: would be recognized on our donor
00:46:39 Speaker 33: walls. and at community events as
00:46:43 Speaker 33: well. And next slide, please. So
00:46:50 Speaker 33: the family reflection room will become
00:46:53 Speaker 33: a place of comfort, respite, and
00:46:55 Speaker 33: regional pride. We envision that the
00:46:58 Speaker 33: room itself will have landmarks and
00:47:00 Speaker 33: pictures of local municipalities in both
00:47:01 Speaker 33: Gray and Bruce counties, so that
00:47:03 Speaker 33: and and the name. And and
00:47:05 Speaker 33: the names of the contributing municipalities
00:47:08 Speaker 33: as well as Gray and Bruce
00:47:11 Speaker 33: County. And next slide, please. And
00:47:13 Speaker 33: just that we'd like to consider
00:47:19 Speaker 33: local artwork and familiar landscapes, and
00:47:22 Speaker 33: to develop it into a real
00:47:25 Speaker 33: you know home-like atmosphere where piece
00:47:26 Speaker 33: of a resident is sleeping. The
00:47:29 Speaker 33: family will be able to come
00:47:32 Speaker 33: here for some. comfort and family
00:47:36 Speaker 33: time while they allow their family
00:47:38 Speaker 33: member to to rest and so
00:47:41 Speaker 33: this we think this will be
00:47:43 Speaker 33: a very well utilized part of
00:47:46 Speaker 33: Saugeen Hospital. And next slide, please.
00:47:48 Speaker 33: So this is just a little
00:47:51 Speaker 33: expansion that the family reflection room
00:47:52 Speaker 33: will be a place of comfort
00:47:55 Speaker 33: for respite and and also regional
00:47:58 Speaker 33: pride. elements would include paintings or
00:48:00 Speaker 33: photographs of familiar landscapes in Gray
00:48:04 Speaker 33: and Bruce counties. It'll have comfortable
00:48:05 Speaker 33: seating, armchairs, couches, and and some
00:48:10 Speaker 33: soft lighting to evoke that home
00:48:15 Speaker 33: atmosphere, and also some some you
00:48:18 Speaker 33: know reflective touches like bookshelves and
00:48:21 Speaker 33: quilts and a coffee and tea
00:48:24 Speaker 33: nook so people can refresh themselves
00:48:26 Speaker 33: and and and take a break.
00:48:30 Speaker 33: There will be a recognition wall
00:48:33 Speaker 33: with a plaque. and framed noting
00:48:35 Speaker 33: that this room was in place
00:48:38 Speaker 33: because of support from the county
00:48:40 Speaker 33: councils of Gray and Bruce. And
00:48:42 Speaker 33: next slide, please. So we're hoping
00:48:45 Speaker 33: that that there will be a
00:48:49 Speaker 33: shared sponsorship, a legacy in compassionate
00:48:51 Speaker 33: care. That the counties of Gray
00:48:53 Speaker 33: and Bruce will be recognized as
00:48:58 Speaker 33: being proactive. That they Active that
00:49:01 Speaker 33: they are fulfilling, providing dignity and
00:49:06 Speaker 33: compassionate end of life support for
00:49:09 Speaker 33: residents, and as well as providing
00:49:11 Speaker 33: support for local families. And that
00:49:14 Speaker 33: this is a response to a
00:49:19 Speaker 33: real local needs that's been identified
00:49:21 Speaker 33: by the Ontario West Health Association
00:49:26 Speaker 33: and making hospice residents care accessible
00:49:30 Speaker 33: as well as closer to home
00:49:33 Speaker 33: and closer to family. We certainly
00:49:35 Speaker 33: would. envision visible community recognition through
00:49:37 Speaker 33: plaques and donor materials, and also
00:49:39 Speaker 33: family gratitude. It provides a legacy
00:49:41 Speaker 33: of regional stewardship that we would
00:49:45 Speaker 33: want to build across both counties,
00:49:47 Speaker 33: and will lay the groundwork for
00:49:50 Speaker 33: future collaboration. And then finally, just
00:49:53 Speaker 33: wanted to touch on our call
00:49:55 Speaker 33: for action. So the Sogin Hospice
00:49:57 Speaker 33: Board respectfully requests that Gray County
00:49:59 Speaker 33: Council considers directing its treasurer to
00:50:01 Speaker 33: work collaboratively with the treasurer of
00:50:04 Speaker 33: Bruce County, and the joint effort
00:50:06 Speaker 33: would aim to develop a feasibility
00:50:10 Speaker 33: report detailing the financial and operational
00:50:11 Speaker 33: considerations of a three hundred and
00:50:13 Speaker 33: fifty thousand dollar shared sponsorship for
00:50:15 Speaker 33: the family reflection room in the
00:50:18 Speaker 33: planned Sogin Hospice, and. This and
00:50:24 Speaker 33: just a note there: the the
00:50:25 Speaker 33: funding model may involve equal annual
00:50:27 Speaker 33: contributions from each county, spread over
00:50:28 Speaker 33: a term of one to five
00:50:31 Speaker 33: years, beginning in 2026. So it
00:50:33 Speaker 33: wouldn't necessarily have to be all
00:50:35 Speaker 33: at once in one year. And
00:50:37 Speaker 33: once the joint report is complete,
00:50:40 Speaker 33: it will be presented to both
00:50:42 Speaker 33: Graham Bruce County Councils for review
00:50:45 Speaker 33: and a formal vote by their
00:50:47 Speaker 33: respective councilors. So that's kind of.
00:50:49 Speaker 33: I think we were kind
00:50:51 Speaker 33: of allotted ten minutes to
00:50:55 Speaker 33: provide those slides. So that was
00:50:58 Speaker 33: a fairly quick review. But I
00:51:02 Speaker 33: would we would invite questions. Chuck
00:51:06 Speaker 33: is our business manager, and Ken
00:51:09 Speaker 33: Brown is the first vice chair
00:51:12 Speaker 33: of the Sogin Hospice Board. I
00:51:13 Speaker 33: recently joined the board in May
00:51:14 Speaker 33: and and live in Mildmay. And
00:51:16 Speaker 29: but I worked at Southeast Grey
00:51:18 Speaker 29: Support Services and in Council McQueen's
00:51:20 Speaker 29: area for twenty years. supporting adults
00:51:22 Speaker 29: with developmental disabilities, so well informed
00:51:24 Speaker 29: about the Gray County aspects of
00:51:25 Speaker 29: of this of our area. So
00:51:27 Speaker 29: open to questions, Madam Warden or
00:51:28 Speaker 29: councilors that you may have to
00:51:30 Speaker 29: follow up on the slides. Okay,
00:51:32 Speaker 29: thank you. And first of all,
00:51:35 Speaker 29: thank you for the service that
00:51:36 Speaker 29: you provide for our residents in
00:51:37 Speaker 29: both Gray and Boost Counties. We
00:51:39 Speaker 29: very much appreciate that. and thank
00:51:41 Speaker 29: you for sharing your detailed presentation
00:51:43 Speaker 29: to give us that information upfront.
00:51:45 Speaker 29: So I will, in a moment,
00:51:47 Speaker 29: just put it out to Council
00:51:49 Speaker 29: Committee, the whole members, if they
00:51:51 Speaker 29: have any questions, and I'll direct
00:51:53 Speaker 29: the questions to you, or perhaps
00:51:54 Speaker 29: maybe to one of your team.
00:51:56 Speaker 29: And normally, what we do is
00:51:57 Speaker 29: we don't pass a motion at
00:51:59 Speaker 29: the end of a delegation. In
00:52:03 Speaker 29: your particular case, you have indicated
00:52:06 Speaker 29: that there is an ask, a
00:52:10 Speaker 29: financial ask, that would require a
00:52:14 Speaker 29: motion to to ask for a
00:52:17 Speaker 29: staff report, for example. So that
00:52:19 Speaker 29: may happen at the end, depending
00:52:21 Speaker 29: on on how the committee, the
00:52:23 Speaker 29: whole, so wishes. So with that,
00:52:27 Speaker 29: I will put it out to
00:52:28 Speaker 29: questions. I'll look online for any
00:52:29 Speaker 29: hands raised, and I will look
00:52:33 Speaker 29: around the room. Okay, I'm not
00:52:37 Speaker 29: seeing any hands here in the
00:52:39 Speaker 29: room, and we'll begin with Doug
00:52:41 Speaker 29: Hutchinson online. Yes. Good morning, Warden
00:52:42 Speaker 33: and and staff. Question for Mister
00:52:44 Speaker 33: Foyzen. For Mr. Foyzen, you mentioned
00:52:46 Speaker 33: about the funding from Grey
00:52:51 Speaker 33: and Bruce Counties, and you also
00:52:56 Speaker 33: mentioned that Minto may be involved
00:52:58 Speaker 33: with some usage. Are you expecting
00:52:59 Speaker 33: funding from Minto or in some
00:53:01 Speaker 33: of the other regions in the
00:53:03 Speaker 29: area also? Yes, we we did
00:53:04 Speaker 29: a presentation for Minto Council back
00:53:05 Speaker 29: in October, and so asking them
00:53:08 Speaker 29: as well as a number of
00:53:09 Speaker 29: other municipalities that we went out
00:53:11 Speaker 29: just to give an update and
00:53:12 Speaker 29: let them know. Date and let
00:53:15 Speaker 29: them know that our building fund
00:53:17 Speaker 29: is active and consideration for budgetary
00:53:18 Speaker 29: consideration for 2026. Okay, thank you.
00:53:20 Speaker 29: Okay, thank you. I'll look around
00:53:22 Speaker 29: the room to see if there
00:53:25 Speaker 29: are further questions, and not seeing
00:53:26 Speaker 29: any in the room or online,
00:53:28 Speaker 29: I will just ask a question.
00:53:29 Speaker 29: I know that I've asked it
00:53:31 Speaker 29: before when when those when representation
00:53:32 Speaker 29: has come forward, and it's just
00:53:35 Speaker 29: a good opportunity for members of
00:53:37 Speaker 29: the public following along to understand
00:53:38 Speaker 29: as well. in the map it
00:53:40 Speaker 29: shows it shows your locations and
00:53:41 Speaker 29: where you hope to expand into
00:53:43 Speaker 29: your location, and it is wonderful
00:53:45 Speaker 29: that you're looking to to do
00:53:47 Speaker 29: that, extend your service. As the
00:53:49 Speaker 29: mayor of the Blue Mountains over
00:53:51 Speaker 29: in the east side of the
00:53:52 Speaker 29: county, we do a lot of
00:53:57 Speaker 29: work with Georgian Triangle Hospice. So
00:54:00 Speaker 29: I just wonder if you could
00:54:04 Speaker 29: just explain what the relationship is
00:54:08 Speaker 29: between the hospices around the region
00:54:10 Speaker 34: in order to make sure that
00:54:12 Speaker 34: we're doing a wraparound opportunity for
00:54:16 Speaker 34: all residents in Gray County to
00:54:18 Speaker 34: find. some some place close to
00:54:20 Speaker 34: home, as you're trying to do
00:54:22 Speaker 34: further south in our county. Yeah,
00:54:25 Speaker 34: for to Chuck to answer
00:54:29 Speaker 34: that, I think Kim can handle
00:54:33 Speaker 34: that because he's been part of
00:54:35 Speaker 34: this for 12 years. Yeah. Okay,
00:54:37 Speaker 34: we've been working discussing this with
00:54:40 Speaker 34: Chapman House here in Shores Hospice
00:54:42 Speaker 34: and Gray Bruce Hospice. Originally spearheaded
00:54:44 Speaker 34: this project, this was going to
00:54:46 Speaker 34: be a satellite of Chapman of
00:54:48 Speaker 34: Gray Bruce Hospice, along with Chapman
00:54:52 Speaker 34: House, but we took over about
00:54:55 Speaker 34: four years ago. We haven't been
00:54:57 Speaker 34: doing a great deal because while
00:55:00 Speaker 34: Chapman House is providing the service
00:55:02 Speaker 34: presently, we're still focusing on organizing
00:55:03 Speaker 34: infrastructure, government relations, the build. So
00:55:05 Speaker 34: it will be. It won't be
00:55:07 Speaker 29: for another year until we've got
00:55:09 Speaker 29: something concrete to offer. that we'll
00:55:11 Speaker 29: be reaching out formally to the
00:55:14 Speaker 29: other two hospices to see how
00:55:20 Speaker 29: we can work together. Right now,
00:55:24 Speaker 29: we're strictly on paper, but we
00:55:26 Speaker 34: are looking forward to working closely
00:55:28 Speaker 34: with them when we have shovels
00:55:29 Speaker 34: in the ground and we're getting
00:55:30 Speaker 34: closer to opening. Okay, thank you.
00:55:32 Speaker 34: So, just to clarify, then, when
00:55:33 Speaker 29: you say the other two, you
00:55:35 Speaker 29: mean Chapin House and the one
00:55:36 Speaker 29: that's located in Collingwood, because that
00:55:38 Speaker 29: is the one that. that no,
00:55:39 Speaker 29: I was saying here in Shores
00:55:42 Speaker 29: in Tiverton. Okay, we haven't had
00:55:44 Speaker 29: any correspondence with Collingwood yet, but
00:55:45 Speaker 29: we will once we. Okay. Okay.
00:55:47 Speaker 29: Thank you very much. That that
00:55:48 Speaker 29: is very helpful. Okay. So with
00:55:50 Speaker 29: that, then I'll just look to
00:55:51 Speaker 29: council to many of the whole
00:55:53 Speaker 29: members to see if there is
00:55:54 Speaker 29: a will to do a motion.
00:55:57 Speaker 29: It does say that you're here
00:55:58 Speaker 29: early in your plans, which is
00:56:00 Speaker 29: always. very helpful for us to
00:56:01 Speaker 29: be able to follow through and
00:56:04 Speaker 29: follow through on the progress. And
00:56:07 Speaker 29: I'm not seeing any hands to
00:56:09 Speaker 29: make a motion, so it looks
00:56:11 Speaker 29: like we will just will will
00:56:12 Speaker 29: take this information away with us.
00:56:14 Speaker 29: And then, as if you keep
00:56:15 Speaker 29: in touch with our with our
00:56:17 Speaker 29: county staff as you get closer
00:56:19 Speaker 29: to particular moments in time where
00:56:22 Speaker 29: you really do need to ask
00:56:24 Speaker 29: about commitments into the next year,
00:56:25 Speaker 29: and then we'll be able to
00:56:27 Speaker 29: entertain information coming from staff about
00:56:30 Speaker 29: that. So, thank you very much.
00:56:32 Speaker 29: Thank you. Thank you very much.
00:56:33 Speaker 29: Okay. Thank you. So that concludes
00:56:35 Speaker 29: all of our delegations for this
00:56:37 Speaker 29: morning. So we will move on
00:56:39 Speaker 29: to item five, which would be
00:56:40 Speaker 29: the call for consentage items that
00:56:44 Speaker 29: need to be pulled. There are
00:56:50 Speaker 29: eleven items in item six that
00:56:51 Speaker 29: are scheduled on the consent agenda.
00:56:53 Speaker 29: Eleven items going down to six
00:56:54 Speaker 29: K. So I will just ask
00:56:56 Speaker 29: now for any hands to be
00:56:59 Speaker 29: raised on any items in the
00:57:00 Speaker 29: consent agenda that somebody wishes to
00:57:02 Speaker 29: have a separate discussion for. I
00:57:03 Speaker 29: know there is a. relationship in
00:57:05 Speaker 29: in terms of the correspondence that
00:57:07 Speaker 29: came with regards to the conservation
00:57:09 Speaker 29: authorities, but of course we have
00:57:10 Speaker 29: that topic coming up later in
00:57:12 Speaker 29: our in our items for discussion
00:57:15 Speaker 29: already. Okay, I do not see
00:57:17 Speaker 29: any hands up, Madam Clerk, for
00:57:24 Speaker 29: any items to be pulled from
00:57:26 Speaker 29: those eleven items. So in that
00:57:34 Speaker 29: case, then it's recommended that the
00:57:36 Speaker 29: following consent agenda items be received,
00:57:37 Speaker 29: and that staff be authorized to
00:57:39 Speaker 29: take the action. Be authorized to
00:57:41 Speaker 29: take the actions necessary to give
00:57:43 Speaker 29: effect to the recommendations in the
00:57:45 Speaker 29: staff reports, and that correspondence be
00:57:48 Speaker 29: supported or received for information as
00:57:51 Speaker 29: recommended in the consent agenda.
00:57:53 Speaker 29: May I ask for a move?
00:57:56 Speaker 29: Move by the Deputy Warden, seconded
00:57:57 Speaker 29: by Councillor Dickert. Any discussion? All
00:57:59 Speaker 29: those in favour? And that motion
00:58:02 Speaker 29: is carried. Madam Clerk. Right. Doing
00:58:04 Speaker 29: well for time. We will move
00:58:07 Speaker 29: on. Two items for discussion. So
00:58:09 Speaker 29: the first item to get on
00:58:12 Speaker 29: the floor for discussion. It's recommended
00:58:14 Speaker 29: that the Budget and Finance Committee
00:58:17 Speaker 29: meeting minutes, dated November twenty six,
00:58:20 Speaker 29: twenty twenty five, be adopted as
00:58:22 Speaker 29: presented, and the following resolutions contained
00:58:25 Speaker 29: therein be endorsed. Number one, that
00:58:28 Speaker 29: report FRBFC twenty two twenty five
00:58:30 Speaker 29: regarding corporate financial update as September
00:58:32 Speaker 29: thirtieth be received for information, and
00:58:35 Speaker 29: number two, that the thirty thousand
00:58:36 Speaker 29: dollar expenditure. for the social pinpoint
00:58:39 Speaker 29: be referred to county council for
00:58:41 Speaker 29: further discussion in the 2026 budget
00:58:43 Speaker 29: discussions. Number three, that the matter
00:58:45 Speaker 29: regarding the proposed increase to asset
00:58:47 Speaker 29: management reserve contributions for 2026 be
00:58:49 Speaker 29: referred to county council during the
00:58:51 Speaker 29: 2026 budget discussions. Number four, regarding
00:58:52 Speaker 29: the possibility of the GTR GTR
00:58:54 Speaker 29: fare increases, be referred to county
00:58:56 Speaker 29: council 2026 budget discussions. And number
00:58:57 Speaker 29: five, that the report F. That
00:59:01 Speaker 29: the report FRBFC twenty four twenty
00:59:02 Speaker 29: five regarding the twenty twenty six
00:59:05 Speaker 29: draft budget be received, and that
00:59:07 Speaker 29: finally number six that the twenty
00:59:09 Speaker 29: twenty six draft budget be presented
00:59:11 Speaker 29: and be forwarded to county council
00:59:13 Speaker 29: for consideration. So this, of course,
00:59:15 Speaker 29: these were these were minutes that
00:59:17 Speaker 29: were done at a very close
00:59:19 Speaker 29: knit in terms of timeline. Meeting
00:59:20 Speaker 29: the budget and finance committee met
00:59:22 Speaker 29: on November twenty six, and then
00:59:26 Speaker 29: right next week we are already
00:59:28 Speaker 29: discussing the budget, and here we
00:59:30 Speaker 29: are gathered. ready, and poised to
00:59:34 Speaker 29: do our second part of the
00:59:35 Speaker 29: discussions tomorrow. So these items here,
00:59:37 Speaker 29: this is just simply to be
00:59:41 Speaker 29: receiving the minutes and the the
00:59:45 Speaker 29: motions that were contained therein, which
00:59:48 Speaker 29: is something we're already acting on.
00:59:51 Speaker 29: So any discussion about these items
00:59:53 Speaker 29: should really be reserved for tomorrow.
00:59:55 Speaker 29: Tomorrow during the day, as we
00:59:59 Speaker 29: crack open the draft budget and
01:00:01 Speaker 29: continue with our deliberations. So with
01:00:07 Speaker 29: that, I'll ask for a mover
01:00:08 Speaker 29: and a seconder. Move by Councillor
01:00:11 Speaker 29: Mackey. Seconder. Seconded, seconded by Councillor
01:00:13 Speaker 29: Carlton, to receive these minutes and
01:00:17 Speaker 29: the motions that are contained therein.
01:00:19 Speaker 29: Is there any discussion? Okay. Seeing
01:00:21 Speaker 29: no hands, then I will call
01:00:23 Speaker 29: the vote. All those in favor,
01:00:26 Speaker 29: and that motion is carried. Thank
01:00:28 Speaker 29: you. Okay. So the next one
01:00:31 Speaker 29: required for discussion is item seven
01:00:33 Speaker 29: B, and it is recommended that
01:00:35 Speaker 29: PDR CW seventy twenty. CW 7025
01:00:37 Speaker 29: be received, and that county staff
01:00:40 Speaker 29: be directed to submit report PDR
01:00:43 Speaker 29: CW 7025 as the County of
01:00:45 Speaker 29: Grey comments on on environmental registry
01:00:47 Speaker 29: posting 0251257, and that the County
01:00:50 Speaker 29: of Grey requests assurance from
01:00:52 Speaker 29: the province that the establishment of
01:00:55 Speaker 29: the new provincial Ontario provincial conservation
01:00:57 Speaker 29: agency will will not be funded
01:00:59 Speaker 29: by the municipal portion of the
01:01:03 Speaker 29: conservation authority levies. and that it
01:01:06 Speaker 29: will not be funded by from
01:01:06 Speaker 29: current Conservation Authority budgets, and that
01:01:11 Speaker 29: Grey County requests that the province
01:01:13 Speaker 29: pause on passing any further changes
01:01:15 Speaker 29: to the Conservation Authority structure until
01:01:16 Speaker 29: further analysis has been conducted and
01:01:18 Speaker 29: additional details are released on the
01:01:22 Speaker 29: new proposed models, and that Report
01:01:24 Speaker 29: PDR CW seventy twenty five be
01:01:26 Speaker 29: shared with members of Provincial Parliament
01:01:28 Speaker 29: Paul Vickers and Brian Sanderson, as
01:01:29 Speaker 29: well as member municipalities aim. Member
01:01:31 Speaker 29: municipalities, AMO, and conservation authorities having
01:01:32 Speaker 29: jurisdiction in Gray County, and that
01:01:34 Speaker 29: staff be authorized to carry out
01:01:36 Speaker 29: the above prior to county council
01:01:40 Speaker 29: approval, as per Section 26.6B of
01:01:42 Speaker 29: the Procedural Bylaw 51.513422. So, with
01:01:43 Speaker 29: that, may I ask for a
01:01:45 Speaker 29: mover and a seconder to get
01:01:47 Speaker 29: it on the floor? Okay. It's
01:01:50 Speaker 29: moved by Councilor Gregg, seconded by
01:01:51 Speaker 29: Councilor Dobrin. It's now on the
01:01:53 Speaker 29: floor for discussion. So, I. do
01:01:55 Speaker 29: know that Deputy CAO, the Deputy
01:01:57 Speaker 29: CAO, and Director Taylor will be
01:02:02 Speaker 29: presenting some information with a slideshow.
01:02:04 Speaker 29: I do recognize that CAO Tim
01:02:05 Speaker 29: Lanthier is also present in the
01:02:06 Speaker 29: room with additional expertise that may
01:02:08 Speaker 29: come in handy in terms of
01:02:10 Speaker 35: the discussion. Thank you very much
01:02:11 Speaker 35: for spending your time here today.
01:02:13 Speaker 35: And is Jennifer Vincent? No. Okay.
01:02:15 Speaker 35: There. I'm sorry. Oh. Okay. There
01:02:17 Speaker 35: you go. Sorry, I didn't see
01:02:20 Speaker 35: you there behind the chair. Okay.
01:02:22 Speaker 35: We also have representation from Saugatuck.
01:02:24 Speaker 35: Also have representation from Sogee Valley,
01:02:25 Speaker 35: the general manager. General manager, so
01:02:28 Speaker 35: thank you very much for both
01:02:30 Speaker 35: of you being present here today.
01:02:33 Speaker 35: I will turn it over,
01:02:35 Speaker 35: turn to the lectern for the
01:02:37 Speaker 35: WCAO. Good morning, Warden. Good morning,
01:02:39 Speaker 35: members of County Council, and through
01:02:41 Speaker 35: you, I'm going to go through
01:02:42 Speaker 35: a slide deck which highlights some
01:02:45 Speaker 35: of the key parts from the
01:02:46 Speaker 35: report. I recognize it's a fairly
01:02:49 Speaker 35: lengthy report that's in front of
01:02:51 Speaker 35: you today. It's been drawn together
01:02:54 Speaker 35: through some collaboration both within Gray
01:02:58 Speaker 35: County. Collaboration both within Grey County,
01:03:00 Speaker 35: with some of our member municipalities,
01:03:02 Speaker 35: and as indicated, with conservation authorities
01:03:05 Speaker 35: that that have a role
01:03:08 Speaker 35: to play within within Grey County.
01:03:09 Speaker 35: So I'm I'm hoping to pull
01:03:11 Speaker 35: out some of the the finer
01:03:12 Speaker 35: elements of the report to to
01:03:14 Speaker 35: highlight those for councils awareness. So,
01:03:17 Speaker 35: so a quick bit of background:
01:03:18 Speaker 35: conservation authorities are formed underneath the
01:03:20 Speaker 35: Conservation Authorities Act, that was passed
01:03:22 Speaker 35: in 1946. It hasn't been a
01:03:25 Speaker 35: static act by any stretch of
01:03:27 Speaker 35: imagination, and has gone through
01:03:28 Speaker 35: successive. changes, including one of the
01:03:30 Speaker 35: most notable ones, which was probably
01:03:33 Speaker 35: in 1954, after following Hurricane Hazel.
01:03:36 Speaker 35: The Act has been strengthened and
01:03:38 Speaker 35: changed, and and focused over various
01:03:39 Speaker 35: different points in time. Most recently,
01:03:41 Speaker 35: to introduce a single mandate for
01:03:42 Speaker 35: a single policy regulation for all
01:03:45 Speaker 35: 36 conservation authorities, and to introduce
01:03:46 Speaker 35: some key performance indicators that conservation
01:03:48 Speaker 35: authorities need to report to the
01:03:51 Speaker 35: province on. That's important because it's
01:03:53 Speaker 35: one of the. things that the
01:03:55 Speaker 35: the provincial proposals in front of
01:03:57 Speaker 35: us today are actually indicating are
01:04:00 Speaker 35: are seeking to address. And so
01:04:02 Speaker 35: some of that stuff is already
01:04:04 Speaker 35: within the act. The act has
01:04:08 Speaker 35: been changed by the current provincial
01:04:09 Speaker 35: government in order to help address
01:04:11 Speaker 35: some of the development priorities that
01:04:15 Speaker 35: they've indicated, including the building of
01:04:17 Speaker 35: one and a half million new
01:04:19 Speaker 35: homes. They are unique in many
01:04:21 Speaker 35: respects as a as a as
01:04:24 Speaker 35: an agency and as a body.
01:04:28 Speaker 35: They are formed at the request
01:04:31 Speaker 35: of their member municipalities. So
01:04:33 Speaker 35: the Act creates a legislative environment
01:04:35 Speaker 35: for a conservation to be a
01:04:37 Speaker 35: conservation authority to be formed,
01:04:40 Speaker 35: but the conservation authority being formed
01:04:42 Speaker 35: is a municipal process. It's embedded
01:04:44 Speaker 35: in local municipalities who have the
01:04:48 Speaker 35: voice to request the establishment
01:04:50 Speaker 35: of a conservation authority, have the
01:04:53 Speaker 35: ability to request the amalgamation, growth,
01:04:56 Speaker 35: change of mandate of a conservation
01:04:58 Speaker 35: authority, and have the ability
01:05:02 Speaker 35: to request the dissolution of a
01:05:03 Speaker 35: conservation. authority. So, whilst they are
01:05:04 Speaker 35: formed by provincial legislation and operate
01:05:06 Speaker 35: within a legislative context and have
01:05:09 Speaker 35: reporting relationships to ministries, which has
01:05:12 Speaker 35: changed over time, they are in
01:05:14 Speaker 35: essence formed at the request, changed
01:05:16 Speaker 35: at the request of the member
01:05:18 Speaker 35: municipalities. That is structured through boards
01:05:19 Speaker 35: of governance, which currently represent just
01:05:21 Speaker 35: member municipalities. Again, a change which
01:05:24 Speaker 35: has strengthened municipal voices over recent
01:05:25 Speaker 35: years around. the conservation authority tables,
01:05:28 Speaker 35: again, that's important because some of
01:05:31 Speaker 35: the changes that are being proposed
01:05:34 Speaker 35: actually shake the change that fundamental
01:05:36 Speaker 35: relationship between municipalities and conservation authorities
01:05:37 Speaker 35: by introducing a new provincial oversight
01:05:38 Speaker 35: body, which has fairly significant powers
01:05:40 Speaker 35: of control over the work of
01:05:41 Speaker 35: of local municipal local conservation authorities.
01:05:44 Speaker 35: So there's 36 of them in
01:05:45 Speaker 35: the province at this point in
01:05:48 Speaker 35: time. As I say. there's a
01:05:50 Speaker 35: history of amalgamations, a history of
01:05:54 Speaker 35: conservation authorities being created and changed
01:05:56 Speaker 35: over time. But currently, there are
01:05:57 Speaker 35: 36 of them. Once again, they're
01:06:00 Speaker 35: established at the request of
01:06:03 Speaker 35: member municipalities. And in Grey County,
01:06:05 Speaker 35: at the minute, there are four
01:06:08 Speaker 35: operating conservation authorities: Saugeen and Grey-Swobbel
01:06:11 Speaker 35: being the two largest, but we
01:06:12 Speaker 35: do have Grand River Conservation Authority
01:06:13 Speaker 35: in the south and Nottawasaga, obviously,
01:06:15 Speaker 35: over towards the east. One of
01:06:18 Speaker 35: the other things, which is perhaps
01:06:20 Speaker 35: a little bit silent in some
01:06:23 Speaker 35: of the materials coming from the
01:06:25 Speaker 35: province, but we feel is an
01:06:27 Speaker 35: important part of this conversation, is
01:06:28 Speaker 35: source water protection. As we know,
01:06:30 Speaker 35: in in Grey and Bruce counties,
01:06:31 Speaker 35: and particularly within Grey, we have
01:06:33 Speaker 35: a very strong reliance on groundwater
01:06:35 Speaker 35: and water supplies, which residents pull
01:06:37 Speaker 35: through wells and and rely on
01:06:39 Speaker 35: for their drinking water. And so,
01:06:43 Speaker 35: source water protection is a body
01:06:44 Speaker 35: of work which sits very closely
01:06:46 Speaker 35: aligned with. conservation authorities, and in
01:06:49 Speaker 35: Grey County we have one, two
01:06:50 Speaker 35: source water protection regions and two
01:06:54 Speaker 35: source water protection committees, and so
01:06:55 Speaker 35: that's the fine lines and the
01:06:59 Speaker 35: thicker lines on this map
01:07:02 Speaker 35: in front of you, and they
01:07:06 Speaker 35: help manage and ensure risks are
01:07:09 Speaker 35: managed to source water
01:07:11 Speaker 35: protection areas. So they define areas
01:07:13 Speaker 35: where there are risks for water
01:07:14 Speaker 35: public water supplies and help to
01:07:16 Speaker 35: manage those. And again, that work
01:07:19 Speaker 35: is very closely aligned with the
01:07:20 Speaker 35: work of conservation authorities. at this
01:07:21 Speaker 35: time, and it is unclear in
01:07:23 Speaker 35: some of the provincial recommendations where
01:07:25 Speaker 35: source water protection would sit and
01:07:27 Speaker 35: how that would be managed on
01:07:29 Speaker 35: a go-forward basis. So the proposed
01:07:31 Speaker 35: changes that are in front of
01:07:33 Speaker 35: us by the province are break
01:07:35 Speaker 35: down into essentially two parts. And
01:07:38 Speaker 35: the first part is the formation
01:07:39 Speaker 35: of a new provincial conservation agency.
01:07:41 Speaker 35: This would be to undertake
01:07:43 Speaker 35: some strategic management and leadership of
01:07:46 Speaker 35: newly formed regional conservation authorities. This
01:07:49 Speaker 35: provincial body would sit alongside the
01:07:51 Speaker 35: municipalities, ministries in the province, which
01:07:54 Speaker 35: conservation authorities already have relationships with.
01:07:56 Speaker 35: At this point in time,
01:07:57 Speaker 35: it would be MECP. It's been
01:08:00 Speaker 35: MNRF in the past, but currently
01:08:02 Speaker 35: MECP that they work with. It
01:08:04 Speaker 35: would be governed by a board
01:08:05 Speaker 35: of five to twelve. There's no
01:08:07 Speaker 35: real clarity on how that board
01:08:10 Speaker 35: would be selected or how that
01:08:11 Speaker 35: board would be representative of the
01:08:13 Speaker 35: work of conservation. authorities across the
01:08:16 Speaker 35: province, and there's some information around
01:08:17 Speaker 35: what the expectations of that provincial
01:08:18 Speaker 35: agency would be, which is
01:08:21 Speaker 35: as general as providing broad oversight,
01:08:23 Speaker 35: but also goes down as far
01:08:26 Speaker 35: as indicating that they would have
01:08:27 Speaker 35: control over how conservation authorities procure
01:08:29 Speaker 35: items and and the work that
01:08:31 Speaker 35: conservation authorities do. So, as its
01:08:33 Speaker 35: pace posted at the minute, that
01:08:35 Speaker 35: provincial conservation body would have fairly
01:08:38 Speaker 35: broad suite of powers and influence
01:08:40 Speaker 35: over. the work that conservation authorities
01:08:41 Speaker 35: would do. It's indicated by the
01:08:43 Speaker 35: province that this board would be
01:08:46 Speaker 35: funded by the conservation authorities at
01:08:51 Speaker 35: this point in time, or have
01:08:52 Speaker 35: the ability to levy its costs
01:08:53 Speaker 35: out to conservation authorities. And so,
01:08:55 Speaker 35: it's unclear how much that would
01:08:58 Speaker 35: cost and how exactly that would
01:08:59 Speaker 35: trickle down. Further, the second part
01:09:02 Speaker 35: of the proposals that sit in
01:09:03 Speaker 35: front of us is the amalgamation
01:09:06 Speaker 35: of the thirty-six existing conservation
01:09:09 Speaker 35: authorities into what are being called
01:09:11 Speaker 35: regional conservation authorities. or RCAs, and
01:09:14 Speaker 35: there would be seven of those
01:09:16 Speaker 35: that they've been proposed at this
01:09:18 Speaker 35: point in time. It's worth indicating
01:09:21 Speaker 35: that repeatedly the province has indicated
01:09:25 Speaker 35: there are no changes to services,
01:09:27 Speaker 35: there are no job losses, and
01:09:29 Speaker 35: will do will continue to be
01:09:32 Speaker 35: the same tomorrow as it is
01:09:33 Speaker 35: today, just with these new regional
01:09:35 Speaker 35: structures and this new conservation agency
01:09:38 Speaker 35: at the provincial level. So, as
01:09:40 Speaker 35: I mentioned at the beginning of
01:09:43 Speaker 35: the presentation, there are key. At
01:09:44 Speaker 35: the presentation, there are key performance
01:09:45 Speaker 35: indicators already in place for conservation
01:09:47 Speaker 35: authorities, which are required to be
01:09:49 Speaker 35: reported to the province on an
01:09:52 Speaker 35: annualized basis. So, one of
01:09:54 Speaker 35: the one of the drivers behind
01:09:56 Speaker 35: this change is to instigate consistency
01:09:58 Speaker 35: and performance consistent performance across the
01:10:01 Speaker 35: province of Ontario. And so, just
01:10:06 Speaker 35: to reiterate, a few years ago,
01:10:08 Speaker 35: all thirty six conservation authorities had
01:10:10 Speaker 35: slightly different regulations. They had their
01:10:12 Speaker 35: own founding regulations, which informed how
01:10:13 Speaker 35: they managed natural hazards in their
01:10:15 Speaker 35: watershed and guided how and where
01:10:17 Speaker 35: they permitted were able to permit
01:10:19 Speaker 35: development. That was standardised a number
01:10:22 Speaker 35: of years ago. We now have
01:10:24 Speaker 35: a single regulation that all 36
01:10:27 Speaker 35: conservation authorities operate under, and they're
01:10:29 Speaker 35: required to meet timelines for permit
01:10:31 Speaker 35: approvals under that. And I detailed
01:10:33 Speaker 35: what they are, but basically there's
01:10:34 Speaker 35: a 30 and a 60 day,
01:10:36 Speaker 35: a 30 and a 90 day
01:10:38 Speaker 35: window that they have to review
01:10:40 Speaker 35: completed permit. applications and make those
01:10:44 Speaker 35: decisions. Double-checked with the two conservation
01:10:46 Speaker 35: authorities that are in the in
01:10:48 Speaker 35: the room today as we prepared
01:10:49 Speaker 35: the report today. And in 2024,
01:10:52 Speaker 35: GSCA attained more than 99 compliance
01:10:54 Speaker 35: with those targets and met 100
01:10:55 Speaker 35: of the major permits. So they're
01:11:01 Speaker 35: they're meeting those KPIs. And whilst
01:11:02 Speaker 35: I didn't get the information from
01:11:04 Speaker 35: Eric in time to include with
01:11:06 Speaker 35: this, the story is very similar
01:11:08 Speaker 35: within Sorging. And in fact, the
01:11:11 Speaker 35: 30 and the 90-day window is
01:11:14 Speaker 35: is that can sometimes feel like
01:11:18 Speaker 35: it's taking 29 or 89 days,
01:11:19 Speaker 35: and they're achieving those targets. It's
01:11:22 Speaker 35: usually they are significantly quicker than
01:11:24 Speaker 35: that. And in fact, in Sorgine
01:11:25 Speaker 35: and Eric, please correct me if
01:11:28 Speaker 35: I'm wrong. I believe the average
01:11:31 Speaker 35: permit time is about four days,
01:11:32 Speaker 35: and so these permits are being
01:11:35 Speaker 35: processed and reviewed quite promptly. The
01:11:37 Speaker 35: province has also taken a strong
01:11:40 Speaker 35: control in terms of planning
01:11:44 Speaker 35: fees, and so again. these have
01:11:46 Speaker 35: been largely taken out of the
01:11:49 Speaker 35: control of local conservation authorities, and
01:11:51 Speaker 35: we are, I think, entering into
01:11:53 Speaker 35: the third year of a planning
01:11:55 Speaker 35: permit fee freeze. So, what are
01:11:58 Speaker 35: we looking at in terms of
01:12:00 Speaker 35: the new areas? So, Grey County
01:12:02 Speaker 35: would be part of two of
01:12:04 Speaker 35: the new regional conservation authorities, or
01:12:07 Speaker 35: RCAs, the Huron Superior RCA and
01:12:10 Speaker 35: the Lake Erie RCA. Southgate, as
01:12:11 Speaker 35: a member municipality, would also be
01:12:14 Speaker 35: part of both the two
01:12:15 Speaker 35: new regional conservation authorities. So it's
01:12:17 Speaker 35: not that Grey County and all
01:12:19 Speaker 35: of its member municipalities go from
01:12:22 Speaker 35: having multiple conservation authorities to having
01:12:26 Speaker 35: just one. We are still have
01:12:27 Speaker 35: two that cover Grey County, and
01:12:30 Speaker 35: our member municipalities at times also
01:12:32 Speaker 35: have more than one. The amalgamation
01:12:33 Speaker 35: would see for Lake Erie eight
01:12:35 Speaker 35: existing conservation authorities combined, and they
01:12:38 Speaker 35: would. serve under Lake Erie. Around
01:12:40 Speaker 35: about 81 municipalities would now be
01:12:42 Speaker 35: served by that regional conservation authority.
01:12:44 Speaker 35: And for Huron Superior, it would
01:12:46 Speaker 35: combine seven existing CAs and would
01:12:47 Speaker 35: serve approximately 80 municipalities. So these
01:12:50 Speaker 35: are significantly larger than they they
01:12:52 Speaker 35: were before. For all conservation authorities,
01:12:55 Speaker 35: this is a change in their
01:12:57 Speaker 35: watershed boundary. Despite these still being
01:12:59 Speaker 35: watershed-based areas, these are a change
01:13:00 Speaker 35: for all the conservation authorities, with
01:13:02 Speaker 35: the exception of one. so
01:13:04 Speaker 35: Toronto Region Conservation Authority boundary stays
01:13:06 Speaker 35: exactly the same, but it does
01:13:07 Speaker 35: see a name change to the
01:13:09 Speaker 35: Central Lake Ontario Regional Conservation Authority.
01:13:10 Speaker 35: Just for some context, and there's
01:13:12 Speaker 35: a number of different things, and
01:13:13 Speaker 35: I thank Mr. Lanthier for his
01:13:17 Speaker 35: his comments on this one. And
01:13:18 Speaker 35: I had to bring in something
01:13:20 Speaker 35: which reflects my accent, of course.
01:13:21 Speaker 35: And so, just just for some
01:13:23 Speaker 35: context on how large these areas
01:13:27 Speaker 35: are, you could. drive from the
01:13:28 Speaker 35: southernmost tip, Lands End, for anyone
01:13:30 Speaker 35: that has been there in Cornwall
01:13:31 Speaker 35: in the UK, right the way
01:13:34 Speaker 35: through the whole of the UK,
01:13:37 Speaker 35: crossing through England and Scotland to
01:13:39 Speaker 35: the northernmost tip, crossing two countries
01:13:41 Speaker 35: and numerous different jurisdictions. And it's
01:13:42 Speaker 35: around about the same distance
01:13:45 Speaker 35: as it is from the southern
01:13:48 Speaker 35: tip of the Conservation of the
01:13:52 Speaker 35: Huron Superior Conservation Authority to its
01:13:55 Speaker 35: northernmost tip. And again, the most
01:13:56 Speaker 35: direct route takes you through two
01:13:59 Speaker 35: countries. It's actually quicker to drive
01:14:02 Speaker 35: through the US than it. would
01:14:04 Speaker 35: be to stay in Canada, driving
01:14:07 Speaker 35: from the north to the southern
01:14:10 Speaker 35: end of our regional conservation area.
01:14:14 Speaker 35: As as Mr. Lantier has said,
01:14:17 Speaker 35: this is larger. The area that
01:14:19 Speaker 35: it would be encompassing would be
01:14:21 Speaker 35: larger than the country of Belize.
01:14:23 Speaker 35: So these are very, very, very
01:14:24 Speaker 35: significant. Perhaps more so than just
01:14:28 Speaker 35: the physical size of them is
01:14:31 Speaker 35: the differences that are within them.
01:14:32 Speaker 35: So the Huron Superior Conservation Authority
01:14:34 Speaker 35: touches on Richmond Hill and its
01:14:37 Speaker 35: further south, and so Richmond Hill
01:14:39 Speaker 35: and the cities in King City,
01:14:40 Speaker 35: as you track up towards Barry,
01:14:42 Speaker 35: there is an urban population within
01:14:45 Speaker 35: the Huron Superior Conservation Regional Conservation
01:14:47 Speaker 35: Area of over 550,000 people. And
01:14:49 Speaker 35: so, we would shift from having
01:14:51 Speaker 35: conservation authorities that respond to the
01:14:52 Speaker 35: needs of a rural population, an
01:14:53 Speaker 35: agricultural population, to a conservation authority
01:14:55 Speaker 35: which speaks to a dominant population
01:14:58 Speaker 35: which is urban and a very
01:14:59 Speaker 35: significantly growing GTA. type environment. Again,
01:15:01 Speaker 35: something to be borne in in
01:15:02 Speaker 35: mind. When we distil the concerns
01:15:04 Speaker 35: down of the proposals, both looking
01:15:07 Speaker 35: at the responses that we've seen
01:15:10 Speaker 35: coming from conservation authorities and their
01:15:13 Speaker 35: boards, and when we we look
01:15:15 Speaker 35: at some of the concerns that
01:15:17 Speaker 35: have been shared by by municipalities,
01:15:19 Speaker 35: they sort of fall into these
01:15:21 Speaker 35: five broad buckets. So the first
01:15:23 Speaker 35: one is there is significant erosion
01:15:25 Speaker 35: of local elected government. Erosion of
01:15:26 Speaker 35: local elected governance because there's
01:15:28 Speaker 35: no clear direction as to how
01:15:30 Speaker 35: local members would be represented on
01:15:32 Speaker 35: what could be insanely large boards.
01:15:34 Speaker 35: There's a negative impact to potential
01:15:37 Speaker 35: programs and services such as education,
01:15:40 Speaker 35: stewardship, and recreation, which are largely
01:15:42 Speaker 35: silent within the proposals that are
01:15:44 Speaker 35: in front of us. And these
01:15:46 Speaker 35: tend to be the services that
01:15:50 Speaker 35: communities rely on and respond to
01:15:52 Speaker 35: most favourably. There's an erosion of
01:15:53 Speaker 35: the rural and agricultural voices in
01:15:56 Speaker 35: favour of an urban and suburban
01:15:59 Speaker 35: one. We would be a relatively
01:16:00 Speaker 35: small player within. a very large
01:16:02 Speaker 35: urban environment under new regional conservation
01:16:04 Speaker 35: authority models. There's a potential for
01:16:06 Speaker 35: increased costs because we don't have
01:16:09 Speaker 35: those regional structures just yet, and
01:16:10 Speaker 35: we don't have the provincial agency
01:16:12 Speaker 35: just yet. And so the the
01:16:14 Speaker 35: costs of those would have to
01:16:16 Speaker 35: find a home somewhere. And there's
01:16:18 Speaker 35: no change or improvement to the
01:16:20 Speaker 35: services that are being provided by
01:16:22 Speaker 35: conservation authorities. They're operating under the
01:16:24 Speaker 35: same regulations and the same
01:16:26 Speaker 35: number of staff. As Mr. Lanthier
01:16:29 Speaker 35: said. if you like conservation authorities
01:16:32 Speaker 35: today, your services tomorrow will will
01:16:35 Speaker 35: be worse. If you don't
01:16:37 Speaker 35: like conservation authorities today, the services
01:16:40 Speaker 35: that provided will be the same
01:16:41 Speaker 35: tomorrow, and you'll just be paying
01:16:42 Speaker 35: more for them. So I'll go
01:16:45 Speaker 35: over these fairly quickly
01:16:48 Speaker 35: and just pull out one or
01:16:50 Speaker 35: two. These are all within the
01:16:52 Speaker 35: report with some some noted differences.
01:16:54 Speaker 35: So there are so just to
01:16:56 Speaker 35: talk about some of the local
01:16:59 Speaker 35: service delivery. very briefly. If we
01:17:01 Speaker 35: think aboutly around local service delivery,
01:17:04 Speaker 35: so the GSEA has a
01:17:08 Speaker 35: foundation. There's an arboretum at English
01:17:09 Speaker 35: Falls. There are a number of
01:17:11 Speaker 35: community activities which are take undertaken
01:17:13 Speaker 35: on a local basis. We Grey
01:17:14 Speaker 35: County rely on services on a
01:17:17 Speaker 35: contract basis in terms of trails
01:17:21 Speaker 35: management, forestry bylaw management, and various
01:17:23 Speaker 35: different other programs. There's no clarity
01:17:25 Speaker 35: where those local programs may sit
01:17:27 Speaker 35: within these regional conservation authorities. Where
01:17:29 Speaker 35: under those ones, under those those
01:17:32 Speaker 35: large areas, where these locally tailored
01:17:34 Speaker 35: services sit. There's also a very
01:17:36 Speaker 35: significant concern around municipal representation. These
01:17:39 Speaker 35: are huge bodies, and it's very
01:17:41 Speaker 35: difficult to see that we'd be
01:17:43 Speaker 35: able to achieve the same municipal
01:17:44 Speaker 35: local voice on them. And emergency
01:17:45 Speaker 35: management, conservation authorities have become key
01:17:47 Speaker 35: partners in terms of emergency management,
01:17:49 Speaker 35: with unique understandings of how watersheds
01:17:53 Speaker 35: respond to things such as freeze
01:17:54 Speaker 35: thaw events, permafrost ice events. Crasal
01:17:55 Speaker 35: ice events and to severe weather
01:17:57 Speaker 35: events such as such as flooding.
01:17:58 Speaker 35: We noted there's a rural-urban differential
01:18:00 Speaker 35: there. The conservation authorities undertake huge
01:18:01 Speaker 35: amounts of asset management. Indeed, there
01:18:03 Speaker 35: was a good news article this
01:18:04 Speaker 35: morning on CBC expressing some concerns
01:18:07 Speaker 35: about Thunder Bay, where they have
01:18:09 Speaker 35: some some urbanised flood control structures,
01:18:12 Speaker 35: which the municipalities have been putting
01:18:14 Speaker 35: money aside for for replacement, renewal,
01:18:15 Speaker 35: and repair. What happens to those
01:18:17 Speaker 35: reserves built up for? asset management
01:18:20 Speaker 35: in these broad models, the
01:18:22 Speaker 35: local agreements that we've mentioned could
01:18:24 Speaker 35: be impacted by this, and local
01:18:26 Speaker 35: staffing. So local staffing is important.
01:18:28 Speaker 35: Our conservation authorities employ people in
01:18:30 Speaker 35: our local communities who pay tax,
01:18:32 Speaker 35: who buy housing, and participate in
01:18:33 Speaker 35: local communities. If there's any change
01:18:35 Speaker 35: in that, particularly if they're getting
01:18:38 Speaker 35: pulled into centres of population, do
01:18:40 Speaker 35: we see an erosion of employment
01:18:41 Speaker 35: within our within our communities? I'm
01:18:44 Speaker 35: going to spend a little bit
01:18:46 Speaker 35: more time, perhaps, on some of
01:18:48 Speaker 35: the cost. Time, perhaps, on some
01:18:50 Speaker 35: of the costs. These are largely
01:18:52 Speaker 35: unknown at this point in time.
01:18:54 Speaker 35: But in the in the unknownness
01:18:55 Speaker 35: of them, what we can tell
01:18:56 Speaker 35: is there is an increase in
01:18:58 Speaker 35: costs. So if you read just
01:18:59 Speaker 35: those, I mentioned TRCA boundaries don't
01:19:01 Speaker 35: change. One of their biggest concerns
01:19:04 Speaker 35: is cost. Transitional cost of changing
01:19:06 Speaker 35: their brand is significant. And if
01:19:07 Speaker 35: it's big enough for Toronto to
01:19:09 Speaker 35: worry about, and there's no boundary
01:19:11 Speaker 35: change, we're talking about changing 36
01:19:13 Speaker 35: different conservation authorities' websites and permitting
01:19:15 Speaker 35: platforms onto new platforms. We're talking.
01:19:19 Speaker 35: about letterhead changes, branding changes, and
01:19:21 Speaker 35: all of those various different things.
01:19:22 Speaker 35: The sides of vehicles need to
01:19:24 Speaker 35: be changed. These are transitional costs,
01:19:26 Speaker 35: and they don't change the impact,
01:19:29 Speaker 35: but there is a high cost
01:19:31 Speaker 35: associated with those transitional costs. Our
01:19:33 Speaker 35: municipal funding models are unique, and
01:19:35 Speaker 35: so under the recent changes to
01:19:36 Speaker 35: the Conservation Authorities Act, the province
01:19:37 Speaker 35: bears a small part of their
01:19:38 Speaker 35: costs, and the municipal levy is
01:19:40 Speaker 35: apportioned over three different sections: one
01:19:43 Speaker 35: for mandatory services, and the other
01:19:45 Speaker 35: two are. Services and the other
01:19:46 Speaker 35: two allow for municipalities to shape
01:19:48 Speaker 35: a degree the services that they
01:19:50 Speaker 35: get from each one of their
01:19:52 Speaker 35: conservation authorities. So there is a
01:19:54 Speaker 35: uniqueness in the way in which
01:19:56 Speaker 35: they're funded. How will that funding
01:20:00 Speaker 35: translate into the new time, into
01:20:02 Speaker 35: the new term? The provincial agency
01:20:03 Speaker 35: will have costs and has the
01:20:05 Speaker 35: power to apportion those costs out,
01:20:08 Speaker 35: which essentially mean those costs will
01:20:10 Speaker 35: be apportioned to municipalities. This
01:20:12 Speaker 35: is a cost download for
01:20:15 Speaker 35: a service which we have little
01:20:18 Speaker 35: little oversight of. The equalisation of
01:20:20 Speaker 35: wages resources. Polarization of wages, resources,
01:20:22 Speaker 35: and services is another piece which
01:20:23 Speaker 35: is important to note. As I
01:20:26 Speaker 35: say, the southern extent of the
01:20:28 Speaker 35: Huron Superior Conservation Authority is dealing
01:20:30 Speaker 35: with the very north end and
01:20:32 Speaker 35: the GTA. It's arguable that salaries
01:20:34 Speaker 35: and wages of staff in that
01:20:35 Speaker 35: south end to the north end
01:20:37 Speaker 35: are going to be different, determined
01:20:40 Speaker 35: by local needs and so on
01:20:42 Speaker 35: and so forth. However, under a
01:20:44 Speaker 35: regional conservation authority model, a GIS
01:20:45 Speaker 35: tech in the north would expect
01:20:48 Speaker 35: to earn the same as a
01:20:51 Speaker 35: GIS tech in the south, as
01:20:53 Speaker 35: has played out many. times through
01:20:55 Speaker 35: past amalgamations, there is never a
01:20:58 Speaker 35: leveling down through amalgamation. You only
01:21:01 Speaker 35: ever level up, which will probably
01:21:03 Speaker 35: drive increased costs. There's very little
01:21:04 Speaker 35: noted about source water protection, which
01:21:06 Speaker 35: is of course of critical importance
01:21:08 Speaker 35: to residents in in Bruce
01:21:12 Speaker 35: in Grey County. Sorry, there's little
01:21:15 Speaker 35: to be said about the charitable
01:21:19 Speaker 35: foundations and volunteers. Some conservation authorities
01:21:22 Speaker 35: have very significant charitable works they've
01:21:23 Speaker 35: undertaken and large reserves associated to
01:21:29 Speaker 35: that. and lands management is one
01:21:30 Speaker 35: of the things which many residents
01:21:31 Speaker 35: of Grey County will rely on
01:21:32 Speaker 35: on a regular basis. Is accessing
01:21:33 Speaker 35: the lands managed by our conservation
01:21:35 Speaker 35: authorities in our area. Some of
01:21:37 Speaker 35: those lands are deliberately set aside
01:21:38 Speaker 35: for recreation, and English Falls would
01:21:41 Speaker 35: be a good example of that.
01:21:44 Speaker 35: But many of those lands are
01:21:47 Speaker 35: passively available for recreation. They require
01:21:49 Speaker 35: management, they require local awareness, and
01:21:52 Speaker 35: they require local input. How will
01:21:53 Speaker 35: those lands continue to be managed
01:21:54 Speaker 35: on a go forward basis? On
01:21:56 Speaker 35: a go-forward basis. So the bill
01:21:59 Speaker 35: was announced on the seventh of
01:22:01 Speaker 35: November. Bill sixty-eight is an omnibus
01:22:04 Speaker 35: bill. It was tabled for first
01:22:06 Speaker 35: reading on sixth of November, and
01:22:08 Speaker 35: and received royal assent twenty-one days
01:22:10 Speaker 35: later, on the twenty-seventh. And this
01:22:12 Speaker 35: was one of the pieces within
01:22:16 Speaker 35: it. And so, in essence, the
01:22:19 Speaker 35: legislation has been passed that
01:22:21 Speaker 35: creates the new provincial conservation authority.
01:22:23 Speaker 35: So it's already legislatively able
01:22:27 Speaker 35: to be formed. and so we're
01:22:29 Speaker 35: recommending that council passes a motion
01:22:30 Speaker 35: to request that the costs of
01:22:32 Speaker 35: that new agency are not downloaded.
01:22:34 Speaker 35: In the in the in the
01:22:37 Speaker 35: sense of looking at this from
01:22:39 Speaker 35: what the province is trying to
01:22:42 Speaker 35: achieve, you never want to go
01:22:45 Speaker 35: head to head with the province,
01:22:46 Speaker 35: and so we we have sat
01:22:48 Speaker 35: round and and had ideas about
01:22:50 Speaker 35: other ways in which the province
01:22:53 Speaker 35: may achieve the same outcomes without
01:22:55 Speaker 35: necessarily incurring the costs and and
01:22:57 Speaker 35: the loss of local local control.
01:23:00 Speaker 35: So, modernisation, efficiency, and consistency are
01:23:01 Speaker 35: good things. Reliable service delivery is
01:23:02 Speaker 35: a shared goal, and I think
01:23:04 Speaker 35: I can speak for the conservation
01:23:05 Speaker 35: authorities we work with. We're all
01:23:06 Speaker 35: united in that goal. There are
01:23:08 Speaker 35: existing tools already in place that
01:23:09 Speaker 35: can can create consistency across the
01:23:11 Speaker 35: province. Can create the consistency of
01:23:12 Speaker 35: tools that they use. Can create
01:23:14 Speaker 35: consistency of the key performance indicators
01:23:16 Speaker 35: they work to. without the high
01:23:17 Speaker 35: costs and overall disruptive system overhaul.
01:23:19 Speaker 35: These could include, as part of
01:23:21 Speaker 35: that process, some amalgamations. These amalgamations
01:23:23 Speaker 35: may be sensible where they are
01:23:25 Speaker 35: evidence-based, geographically appropriate, and where CAs
01:23:26 Speaker 35: and member municipalities agree that there
01:23:28 Speaker 35: are efficiencies that could be found
01:23:29 Speaker 35: without incurring those high costs and
01:23:31 Speaker 35: without impacting the loss of local
01:23:33 Speaker 35: service delivery. The province has already
01:23:35 Speaker 35: done some work in terms of
01:23:38 Speaker 35: implementing key. standardised fees and and
01:23:40 Speaker 35: looking at key performance indicators, much
01:23:42 Speaker 35: more could be done in terms
01:23:43 Speaker 35: of that regard, and that could
01:23:45 Speaker 35: be achieved through standardised best practices,
01:23:46 Speaker 35: technical guidances, and policy applied across
01:23:48 Speaker 35: the province. And we understand that
01:23:50 Speaker 35: conservation authorities are very open to
01:23:53 Speaker 35: those conversations. To date, there's not
01:23:55 Speaker 35: been any consultation. Now, when I
01:23:56 Speaker 35: say to date, there has been
01:23:59 Speaker 35: some consultation, just nothing that we've
01:24:01 Speaker 35: been part of at this point.
01:24:03 Speaker 35: I'm hoping that there are members
01:24:05 Speaker 35: around the table that have. there
01:24:07 Speaker 35: has been no consultation or engagement
01:24:09 Speaker 35: on this approach made by the
01:24:11 Speaker 35: province, and as I say, Bill
01:24:12 Speaker 35: sixty eight has already received royal
01:24:14 Speaker 35: assent. However, we are aware that
01:24:17 Speaker 35: there are regional meetings occurring, and
01:24:19 Speaker 35: believe there was one on December
01:24:20 Speaker 29: the eighth in Collingwood. Invitations were
01:24:21 Speaker 29: sent for that, and I am
01:24:23 Speaker 29: hoping some some members received them.
01:24:24 Speaker 29: As we are not a direct
01:24:27 Speaker 29: funding partner for a conservation authority,
01:24:27 Speaker 29: the county has not been involved
01:24:29 Speaker 29: in those consultations to date, but
01:24:31 Speaker 29: anticipate our member municipalities have. So
01:24:34 Speaker 29: I'll end with a recap of
01:24:35 Speaker 29: the recommendations. We're basically asking for
01:24:37 Speaker 29: council support to respond to the
01:24:40 Speaker 29: province through its ERO posting, which
01:24:44 Speaker 29: is due in late December. We're
01:24:48 Speaker 29: asking for assurances that there are
01:24:49 Speaker 29: no additional costs that are headed
01:24:53 Speaker 29: the way of our member municipalities
01:24:55 Speaker 29: in respect to the new conservation
01:24:57 Speaker 29: agency, and we're seeking for a
01:24:58 Speaker 29: pause on further changes on the
01:25:00 Speaker 29: basis that we'd like to see
01:25:03 Speaker 29: some evidence, evidence base around the
01:25:07 Speaker 29: effectiveness of these new regional conservation
01:25:09 Speaker 29: authorities. And with that, I'm available
01:25:13 Speaker 29: for questions. I apologise for. Questions.
01:25:14 Speaker 36: I apologize for taking a few
01:25:16 Speaker 36: minutes there. Director Taylor is also
01:25:17 Speaker 36: available, and at your pleasure, Warden.
01:25:18 Speaker 36: I believe our two general managers
01:25:20 Speaker 36: will be happy to take questions
01:25:21 Speaker 36: as well. Thank you. Okay. Thank
01:25:24 Speaker 37: you very much. No apologies necessary.
01:25:26 Speaker 37: We needed that information in front
01:25:27 Speaker 37: of us, so thank you very
01:25:30 Speaker 20: much, Director Taylor. Is anything that
01:25:35 Speaker 20: you wanted to add before I
01:25:39 Speaker 20: open it? Okay. So, with that,
01:25:41 Speaker 20: as we said to you, we
01:25:42 Speaker 20: do have General Manager Eric Downing
01:25:44 Speaker 20: as well as CAO Tim Lanthier
01:25:46 Speaker 20: here, ready to add any additional
01:25:48 Speaker 38: information. So. with that, I will
01:25:52 Speaker 38: put it out to committee. The
01:25:55 Speaker 38: whole members, if they have questions
01:25:58 Speaker 38: or discussion or comments, we'll start
01:26:00 Speaker 38: with Councillor Body. There we go.
01:26:01 Speaker 38: Thank you. I believe Mr. Lante
01:26:04 Speaker 38: was on open line yesterday. If
01:26:06 Speaker 38: he he gave a answered a
01:26:08 Speaker 38: question about how much money
01:26:11 Speaker 38: is coming from the province and
01:26:12 Speaker 38: where the money comes from,
01:26:15 Speaker 38: and I think that's kind of
01:26:17 Speaker 38: important for us to to hear.
01:26:20 Speaker 38: I guess the province isn't talking
01:26:23 Speaker 38: about cutting costs, but like it's
01:26:24 Speaker 38: it's peanuts that they're putting in.
01:26:26 Speaker 38: If if Tim could answer that,
01:26:28 Speaker 38: it was just briefly what the
01:26:29 Speaker 38: Ontario government used to put in,
01:26:31 Speaker 38: what they put in now, and
01:26:33 Speaker 38: where the money is coming from.
01:26:35 Speaker 38: I I think it's good for
01:26:37 Speaker 38: all of us to hear it.
01:26:39 Speaker 38: Okay, so I'll encourage CEO Lantzy
01:26:39 Speaker 38: if you'd like to come to
01:26:42 Speaker 38: the lectern, and the deputy CEO
01:26:44 Speaker 38: will assist you with the mic.
01:26:45 Speaker 38: thank you, Madam Warden and Council.
01:26:47 Speaker 38: I'll speak with regards to Grey-Sable
01:26:48 Speaker 38: Conservation Authority budget, and it won't
01:26:50 Speaker 38: be exactly the same across the
01:26:53 Speaker 38: province, but the model generally remains
01:26:59 Speaker 38: the same. So, when the conservation
01:27:01 Speaker 38: authorities first started, it started as,
01:27:05 Speaker 38: as Deputy CAO mentioned, as a
01:27:07 Speaker 38: partnership between the province and the
01:27:09 Speaker 38: and the municipalities, rather. But at
01:27:10 Speaker 38: the behest of the municipalities, and
01:27:13 Speaker 39: at that time, it's my understanding
01:27:15 Speaker 39: that budget was split fifty-fifty between
01:27:20 Speaker 39: the province and the municipalities. Today,
01:27:22 Speaker 39: moving into twenty twenty-six for Grey-Sable
01:27:27 Speaker 39: Conservation Authority's budget, we're funding fifty
01:27:29 Speaker 39: percent of that budget ourselves through
01:27:31 Speaker 39: self-generated revenues that may, in fact,
01:27:33 Speaker 39: be at risk through this amalgamation.
01:27:36 Speaker 39: Our municipal partners are funding about
01:27:41 Speaker 39: forty-three percent of that budget, and
01:27:44 Speaker 39: the province is coming to the
01:27:48 Speaker 39: table with seven percent. Now, in
01:27:49 Speaker 39: Grey-Sable's case, it's important. Now, in
01:27:52 Speaker 39: Grey Sable's case, it's important to
01:27:54 Speaker 39: recognize that the lion's share of
01:27:57 Speaker 39: that seven percent is drinking water
01:28:00 Speaker 39: source protection work that we do
01:28:03 Speaker 39: for Grey Sable, for Saugeen, and
01:28:04 Speaker 39: for Northern Bruce Peninsula. So, when
01:28:10 Speaker 39: we look at the money that
01:28:12 Speaker 39: the province is bringing forward to
01:28:17 Speaker 39: Grey Sable Conservation Authority for
01:28:20 Speaker 39: the natural hazards work, that seems
01:28:23 Speaker 39: to be one of the drivers
01:28:26 Speaker 39: here. It's about one percent of
01:28:30 Speaker 39: our budget. It's thirty-seven thousand dollars
01:28:33 Speaker 39: of a four point two five
01:28:37 Speaker 39: million dollar budget. Hopefully, that helps
01:28:39 Speaker 39: answer the question. Thank you very
01:28:44 Speaker 39: much. We'll go to Councillor Dobrine.
01:28:47 Speaker 39: Thank you, and thank you to
01:28:51 Speaker 39: our representatives from the Conservation Authorities
01:28:53 Speaker 39: for being here. And I can
01:28:58 Speaker 39: add that SPCA is not much
01:29:01 Speaker 39: different in those numbers. What I
01:29:03 Speaker 39: did want to add to the
01:29:05 Speaker 39: Deputy CAO is that I attended
01:29:08 Speaker 39: that Callingwood session on Monday, and
01:29:12 Speaker 39: from still unknown, of course, we
01:29:14 Speaker 39: we we don't know what we
01:29:17 Speaker 39: don't know. But for the first
01:29:19 Speaker 39: three years, the province will totally
01:29:24 Speaker 39: fund this this new agency of
01:29:27 Speaker 39: oversight. After that, we don't know.
01:29:30 Speaker 39: The transition of letterhead and that
01:29:33 Speaker 39: branding piece was spoken about
01:29:36 Speaker 39: at the meeting, and it would
01:29:38 Speaker 39: be transition. So as you run
01:29:40 Speaker 39: out of business cards and stationery.
01:29:43 Speaker 39: and those things, then you would
01:29:45 Speaker 39: reorder under the new brand. But
01:29:47 Speaker 39: again, what that brand looks like
01:29:51 Speaker 39: would be a decision of the
01:29:56 Speaker 39: new regional conservation authority. The assets
01:29:58 Speaker 39: piece of the puzzle, the lands
01:30:02 Speaker 39: that have been purchased through means
01:30:03 Speaker 39: of each individual conservation authority, is
01:30:05 Speaker 39: supposed to remain intact. the question
01:30:07 Speaker 39: of lands that have been donated
01:30:11 Speaker 39: by landowners, so that the conservation
01:30:13 Speaker 10: authority could protect them locally in
01:30:15 Speaker 10: perpetuity, would fall within those assets
01:30:17 Speaker 10: and be under the management of
01:30:21 Speaker 10: the new seven regional conservation authorities.
01:30:24 Speaker 10: So, there's the potential for losing
01:30:26 Speaker 10: some of that land management and.
01:30:28 Speaker 10: agreement that we have with those
01:30:30 Speaker 10: those dones. So there's there. I
01:30:33 Speaker 10: really do appreciate the deputy CAO's
01:30:35 Speaker 10: presentation. It really summarized it very
01:30:37 Speaker 10: clearly. There are still too many
01:30:41 Speaker 10: unknowns. I support the comments that
01:30:42 Speaker 10: are going forward. They did attempt
01:30:47 Speaker 10: to share or dispel some of
01:30:50 Speaker 10: the concerns with regard to what
01:30:51 Speaker 10: this all looks like. But in
01:30:54 Speaker 20: my opinion, introducing another level of
01:30:56 Speaker 20: oversight increases costs and won't speed
01:30:57 Speaker 20: up the process. I fully support
01:30:59 Speaker 20: the province providing the tools that
01:31:02 Speaker 20: are available to some larger conservation
01:31:05 Speaker 20: authorities, so that we're all playing
01:31:05 Speaker 20: and have those same tools to
01:31:08 Speaker 20: work with. And there are efficiencies
01:31:12 Speaker 20: that could be found through that.
01:31:14 Speaker 20: So thank you very much for.
01:31:16 Speaker 20: the presentation, the report. There's still
01:31:17 Speaker 20: more information to be had. Okay,
01:31:22 Speaker 20: thank you very much, and we'll
01:31:26 Speaker 20: go to Councillor McKay. Yes, thank
01:31:30 Speaker 20: you very much. That was a
01:31:32 Speaker 20: lot of information through you, Warden.
01:31:34 Speaker 40: I sat on conservation in the
01:31:36 Speaker 40: good days. I'm talking, sat on
01:31:55 Speaker 40: there for 25 years with good
01:31:58 Speaker 40: funding from the province, and we
01:32:01 Speaker 40: seemed to get along. We seem
01:32:02 Speaker 40: to get along quite good. There's
01:32:03 Speaker 40: a lot of donations of volunteer
01:32:07 Speaker 35: and giving land, and I have
01:32:08 Speaker 35: a real concern that we're going
01:32:12 Speaker 35: to lose all that because I
01:32:13 Speaker 35: still am a believer that they
01:32:15 Speaker 35: don't really think of us north
01:32:17 Speaker 35: of Highway Seven. So the more
01:32:19 Speaker 35: we can do to support our
01:32:21 Speaker 35: local conservation, we need to do
01:32:22 Speaker 35: it or we're going to be
01:32:25 Speaker 35: in trouble. Thank you. Thank you.
01:32:27 Speaker 35: And we'll go to Councillor Eccles.
01:32:31 Speaker 35: But then I'll just ask, perhaps,
01:32:33 Speaker 35: if either Eric or Tim might
01:32:36 Speaker 41: want to add anything to that
01:32:39 Speaker 41: question that has been resonating quite
01:32:41 Speaker 41: a bit about local donations of
01:32:43 Speaker 41: land. So, when people have, as
01:32:45 Speaker 41: Councillor McKay has outlined, put it
01:32:46 Speaker 41: into the hands of a conservation
01:32:49 Speaker 41: authority, believing that it would be
01:32:50 Speaker 41: forever locally managed and protected, what
01:32:52 Speaker 41: would happen? What what would happen
01:32:56 Speaker 41: if they have any further information
01:32:59 Speaker 41: on on that process? We'll go
01:33:03 Speaker 41: to Councillor Eccles in the meantime.
01:33:05 Speaker 41: I've said on the conservation, so
01:33:06 Speaker 41: game conservation, numerous times back and
01:33:10 Speaker 41: forth. I guess out of the
01:33:13 Speaker 41: whole bill and and this restructuring
01:33:16 Speaker 41: and whatnot, what is the province
01:33:17 Speaker 41: trying to fix? What's the problem?
01:33:19 Speaker 41: Actually, I'm not sure I can
01:33:21 Speaker 41: take a stab. So, I think
01:33:23 Speaker 41: ultimately, if we look at the
01:33:25 Speaker 41: broad suite of what the province
01:33:27 Speaker 41: is committed to in terms of
01:33:32 Speaker 41: its its its policy agenda over
01:33:33 Speaker 41: both its previous term and its
01:33:36 Speaker 41: current term. There is there is
01:33:41 Speaker 41: a housing shortage in the province
01:33:44 Speaker 41: of Ontario. They are looking to
01:33:46 Speaker 41: put in place ways of getting
01:33:50 Speaker 42: more houses built. Take to do
01:33:53 Speaker 42: so, and so if we're following
01:33:56 Speaker 42: that logic through, and I'm not
01:33:58 Speaker 42: going to make any comment on
01:34:07 Speaker 43: on on on that that direction.
01:34:13 Speaker 43: But if you follow that logic
01:34:17 Speaker 43: through, the intent behind this would
01:34:19 Speaker 43: be to eliminate red tape, reduce
01:34:20 Speaker 43: red tape, to allow for more
01:34:23 Speaker 43: houses to be built quicker. if
01:34:27 Speaker 43: we follow the policy intent of
01:34:28 Speaker 43: the province, that is what this
01:34:32 Speaker 43: is driving at. And then, if
01:34:34 Speaker 43: you take that next step, conservation
01:34:39 Speaker 43: authority red tape is a barrier
01:34:40 Speaker 43: to the development of one point
01:34:44 Speaker 43: five million dollar, one point five
01:34:48 Speaker 43: million new homes. And therefore, by
01:34:51 Speaker 43: taking a stronger provincial role over
01:34:53 Speaker 43: larger regional bodies, the intent would
01:34:55 Speaker 43: be to lower overall costs and
01:34:57 Speaker 43: cut red tape to speed up
01:34:59 Speaker 43: permanent. To speed up permitting times,
01:35:00 Speaker 43: somewhat with my tongue inside my
01:35:05 Speaker 43: cheek, for the benefit of Sorgen
01:35:08 Speaker 43: Valley residents, that would be trying
01:35:11 Speaker 43: to reduce a permit time of
01:35:12 Speaker 43: four days to something quicker than
01:35:14 Speaker 43: four days. And so, I will
01:35:15 Speaker 43: leave it to that. That is
01:35:18 Speaker 43: what I understand the intent behind
01:35:24 Speaker 43: this bill and act is for.
01:35:26 Speaker 43: Okay, thank you for that attempt
01:35:31 Speaker 43: to answer. Follow up, Councillor Eccles.
01:35:32 Speaker 43: I too was in Collingwood on
01:35:37 Speaker 43: Monday morning, and you know that's
01:35:40 Speaker 43: a better answer than what I
01:35:44 Speaker 20: got there. But I'm still struggling
01:35:45 Speaker 20: to figure out what is in
01:35:48 Speaker 20: here. Is it just to
01:35:52 Speaker 44: get conservation back to what the
01:35:53 Speaker 44: legislation said back in 1954? Mr.
01:35:57 Speaker 44: Lanthier said that forty percent, forty,
01:36:00 Speaker 44: forty-three percent was self-generated funding. I
01:36:02 Speaker 44: believe as well was it fifty
01:36:04 Speaker 44: percent is self-generated somewhere around there,
01:36:06 Speaker 44: and a number of the conservation
01:36:09 Speaker 44: authorities that were in Collingwood, there
01:36:13 Speaker 44: was a representative from Thunder Bay
01:36:14 Speaker 44: there. Matter of fact, as well
01:36:17 Speaker 44: too. But I guess. the point
01:36:21 Speaker 44: being is that in '54 was
01:36:24 Speaker 44: it that this was a business
01:36:27 Speaker 44: case to be driven? Is that
01:36:30 Speaker 44: what we're looking at here? That
01:36:36 Speaker 44: conservation authorities have gone this way.
01:36:37 Speaker 44: I don't know. Like, and I'm
01:36:40 Speaker 44: not certain that I can't support
01:36:42 Speaker 44: the way that this is being
01:36:45 Speaker 44: put out. If it is to
01:36:47 Speaker 20: fix a problem, that we have
01:36:48 Speaker 20: no idea what it is to
01:36:53 Speaker 20: fix. So, into the dark, and
01:36:59 Speaker 20: hopefully, you know, maybe at December
01:37:02 Speaker 20: twenty fifth, at Christmas in Owen
01:37:09 Speaker 20: Sound, they'll give us an answer.
01:37:11 Speaker 20: You know, the present will be
01:37:13 Speaker 20: presented to us. Hopefully, Mister Body.
01:37:16 Speaker 20: You know, I don't know. Thank
01:37:20 Speaker 20: you. Thank you. Yes, and it
01:37:21 Speaker 20: was fifty percent self-funded, such as
01:37:23 Speaker 45: educational programming. Okay, so we've got
01:37:25 Speaker 45: a question here from Councillor Kentner.
01:37:27 Speaker 45: Go ahead. Thank you, and through
01:37:29 Speaker 45: Warden Matrasov's, I think Councillor Eccles
01:37:33 Speaker 45: really nailed this. Maybe two weeks
01:37:35 Speaker 45: ago when we were talking about
01:37:37 Speaker 45: other aspects of provincial consolidation and
01:37:38 Speaker 45: centralisation, I think it is, and
01:37:41 Speaker 45: I think there's a great danger
01:37:44 Speaker 45: of actual privatisation. Actual privatization of
01:37:47 Speaker 45: the of the assets of some
01:37:49 Speaker 45: of the assets that have come
01:37:52 Speaker 45: been developed through the the years
01:37:54 Speaker 45: by the conservation authorities. I think
01:37:56 Speaker 45: it's a worst case scenario, and
01:37:58 Speaker 45: that I applaud all the efforts
01:38:01 Speaker 45: that are being made. The municipality
01:38:03 Speaker 45: of Miford approved a very lengthy
01:38:06 Speaker 45: motion yesterday, which will be circulated
01:38:09 Speaker 45: to everyone because we need a
01:38:11 Speaker 45: lot of. pushback here if we're
01:38:13 Speaker 45: going to prevent quite a disastrous
01:38:15 Speaker 45: situation. Thank you. Okay, so the
01:38:17 Speaker 45: question of assets is a good
01:38:18 Speaker 45: segue. Cao Lanthier or General Manager
01:38:21 Speaker 45: Downing, did you have any additional
01:38:24 Speaker 45: information about the legacy of gifts
01:38:27 Speaker 45: that have land gifts that have
01:38:28 Speaker 45: been given to the conservation parties,
01:38:30 Speaker 45: and anything further, or are you?
01:38:32 Speaker 45: unknown of any further information? Okay,
01:38:35 Speaker 45: here here comes an attempt. Thank
01:38:37 Speaker 45: you. Thank you, Madam Warden. I'd
01:38:41 Speaker 45: like to preface this with this
01:38:44 Speaker 45: is speculation because we have not
01:38:47 Speaker 45: been provided with enough information to
01:38:48 Speaker 45: provide solid answers. What I'm going
01:38:51 Speaker 45: to draw on is my own
01:38:54 Speaker 45: experience in my role, both in
01:38:57 Speaker 45: managing conservation authority lands and and
01:38:59 Speaker 45: then my role as the
01:39:01 Speaker 45: CAO of the conservation authority, is
01:39:03 Speaker 29: that inevitably periodically we will have
01:39:05 Speaker 29: a member at our board table
01:39:08 Speaker 29: that asks, you know, funding's tight.
01:39:11 Speaker 29: Is there any land that we
01:39:14 Speaker 29: can divest of to help with
01:39:16 Speaker 29: operating funding? My stance has always
01:39:18 Speaker 29: been that one-off sales of
01:39:20 Speaker 29: of property and assets are not
01:39:22 Speaker 29: good solutions to operating funding shortfalls
01:39:24 Speaker 29: because they are. that they're one
01:39:25 Speaker 29: off. My concern lies in that
01:39:27 Speaker 29: when we scale up to a
01:39:29 Speaker 29: regional board, where our eighty local
01:39:32 Speaker 29: member municipalities—and I say local across
01:39:33 Speaker 29: the region—are not familiar with the
01:39:36 Speaker 29: different corners of our actual local
01:39:38 Speaker 29: areas, what's local to us today,
01:39:40 Speaker 29: is that there's going to be
01:39:43 Speaker 29: a disconnect between what we see
01:39:46 Speaker 29: on paper or a map and
01:39:48 Speaker 29: what we value in our local.
01:39:50 Speaker 29: And I think that disconnect raises
01:39:51 Speaker 29: risk. in terms of the the
01:39:53 Speaker 29: potential for those lands to be
01:39:55 Speaker 29: divested of when the goal of
01:39:57 Speaker 29: conservation authorities right now in land
01:39:58 Speaker 29: management is to preserve those in
01:40:01 Speaker 29: perpetuity for our communities. Again, that
01:40:06 Speaker 29: is speculation based on my experience
01:40:07 Speaker 29: in this role. Thank you. Thank
01:40:09 Speaker 29: you. And while you're there, wait,
01:40:11 Speaker 29: wait, wait, don't go too far.
01:40:13 Speaker 29: While you're there, so while that
01:40:15 Speaker 29: meeting was on, I was actually
01:40:17 Speaker 45: at. Parliament Hill with Conservation Ontario.
01:40:20 Speaker 45: It was the Great Lakes Day,
01:40:25 Speaker 45: where there were sixteen sixteen organizations
01:40:28 Speaker 45: all advocating for the Great Lakes,
01:40:31 Speaker 45: such as Environmental Stewardship, and Conservation
01:40:33 Speaker 45: Ontario was there, loud and present.
01:40:38 Speaker 45: Angela Coleman was there along with
01:40:41 Speaker 45: Bonnie Fox. So, what are you
01:40:44 Speaker 45: hearing in terms of restructure,
01:40:47 Speaker 45: restructure, new model, etc.? We've we've
01:40:52 Speaker 45: zeroed in on the idea that
01:40:56 Speaker 45: right now we know in our
01:41:00 Speaker 45: local conservation authorities, our municipalities are
01:41:02 Speaker 46: represented through there's one each or
01:41:07 Speaker 46: maybe two depending on population. But
01:41:11 Speaker 46: we know that the voices are
01:41:16 Speaker 46: all there. Then we know that
01:41:20 Speaker 46: the chair of that that concert
01:41:22 Speaker 46: that local conservation authority will then
01:41:25 Speaker 46: take that voice and sit together
01:41:29 Speaker 46: with Conservation Ontario, which provides good
01:41:33 Speaker 46: advocacy and good dialogue with the
01:41:36 Speaker 46: province and in this particular case
01:41:38 Speaker 46: the federal level as well. So
01:41:40 Speaker 46: what is the discussion about what
01:41:42 Speaker 46: would happen with that that structure?
01:41:43 Speaker 46: Because there's already a deficit. If
01:41:48 Speaker 46: a new board of a much
01:41:54 Speaker 46: larger one means not every municipality
01:41:56 Speaker 46: will be seated there. What about
01:41:59 Speaker 46: that structure where then that voice
01:42:01 Speaker 46: gets carried by the chair and
01:42:05 Speaker 46: the CAOs sitting around at Conservation
01:42:13 Speaker 46: Ontario together? So, Madam Warden, I
01:42:15 Speaker 46: just want to make sure that
01:42:17 Speaker 46: I understand the question. Are we
01:42:18 Speaker 46: asking about what happens to the
01:42:19 Speaker 46: entity that is Conservation Ontario, or
01:42:21 Speaker 45: we are? Okay. I don't have
01:42:24 Speaker 45: an answer for that. I am
01:42:25 Speaker 45: concerned that if we are rolled
01:42:26 Speaker 45: up into seven regions, that I'm
01:42:27 Speaker 45: concerned for Conservation Ontario. I'll leave
01:42:29 Speaker 45: it at that. Thank you. Thank
01:42:31 Speaker 45: you. We'll go over to Councillor
01:42:32 Speaker 45: Dobrin. Thank you, Warden, and through
01:42:35 Speaker 45: you, getting back to the funding
01:42:38 Speaker 45: model with their. Where fifty percent
01:42:39 Speaker 45: is self-generated, forty-three percent is municipally
01:42:41 Speaker 45: funded. Where originally was a fifty-fifty
01:42:43 Speaker 45: partnership. Could you elaborate on the
01:42:46 Speaker 45: use of those self-generated funds? I
01:42:49 Speaker 45: know from authority we have campgrounds
01:42:50 Speaker 45: which are totally self-supporting, and help
01:42:52 Speaker 45: alleviate some of the municipal burden.
01:42:54 Speaker 45: the fees from environmental planning and
01:42:56 Speaker 45: regulations, if they were actually even
01:43:00 Speaker 45: close to cost recovery, help reduce
01:43:01 Speaker 45: the burden on the taxpayer, the
01:43:03 Speaker 45: municipal burden, because development should pay
01:43:05 Speaker 45: for development. With the province only
01:43:07 Speaker 45: contributing a small portion, one percent
01:43:09 Speaker 45: in in the case of Sauguen
01:43:11 Speaker 45: Valley Conservation Authority, maybe upwards. of
01:43:13 Speaker 45: three, but also the source water
01:43:18 Speaker 45: protection. I understand they did say
01:43:19 Speaker 45: on Monday that that would be
01:43:20 Speaker 45: protected. The self-generated funds. If the
01:43:21 Speaker 45: province were actually partners in this,
01:43:23 Speaker 45: would we need to utilize those
01:43:26 Speaker 45: self-generated funds? Would we need to
01:43:28 Speaker 45: rely on those self-generated funds to
01:43:29 Speaker 45: support the conservation goal? Cool. Yeah,
01:43:31 Speaker 45: that's an interesting question and an
01:43:33 Speaker 45: interesting way to think about it.
01:43:36 Speaker 45: Just, I just say that in
01:43:39 Speaker 45: the fact that I hadn't thought
01:43:40 Speaker 45: about that because we that money
01:43:42 Speaker 45: just doesn't exist from the province.
01:43:43 Speaker 45: I think what it would allow
01:43:46 Speaker 45: us to do. So, I'm going
01:43:47 Speaker 45: to step back a second before
01:43:49 Speaker 45: I answer that question fully and
01:43:53 Speaker 45: look at how Grace Ovals, because
01:43:54 Speaker 45: again, I can only speak to
01:43:55 Speaker 45: my own organization, but but how
01:43:57 Speaker 45: our funding model and and revenue.
01:44:00 Speaker 45: Model and and revenues and what
01:44:02 Speaker 45: we do with those revenues has
01:44:04 Speaker 45: changed over the last five to
01:44:07 Speaker 45: ten years, and some areas where
01:44:08 Speaker 45: we've seen dramatic increases in our
01:44:10 Speaker 45: localized funding is the the
01:44:13 Speaker 45: primary one that I'll lean on
01:44:15 Speaker 45: is our parking program. So we've
01:44:17 Speaker 45: done very very well with our
01:44:19 Speaker 45: parking program over the last five
01:44:26 Speaker 45: to ten years, such that in
01:44:27 Speaker 45: 2025 we're expecting over four hundred
01:44:32 Speaker 45: thousand dollars in revenues from that.
01:44:34 Speaker 45: What that means in terms of
01:44:36 Speaker 45: our relationship with the municipalities. is
01:44:39 Speaker 45: that our operations department, that looks
01:44:41 Speaker 45: after those lands on the ground,
01:44:43 Speaker 47: hands-on, day to day, the levy
01:44:45 Speaker 47: ask in that department initially dropped
01:44:49 Speaker 47: and has maybe just come back
01:44:53 Speaker 47: to where it was at that
01:44:55 Speaker 47: point. So anyway, I guess what
01:44:57 Speaker 47: I'm saying is the levy has
01:44:59 Speaker 47: remained static in that. But in
01:45:01 Speaker 47: conjunction with that levy staying static,
01:45:03 Speaker 47: we've been able to expand the
01:45:04 Speaker 47: staffing in that program area to
01:45:05 Speaker 22: provide better visitor experience and better
01:45:08 Speaker 22: protect the natural environment. and we've
01:45:09 Speaker 22: been able to to bolster our
01:45:12 Speaker 22: reserves that help us reinvest in
01:45:14 Speaker 22: those lands to pay for those
01:45:16 Speaker 22: assets. So that's something that we've
01:45:20 Speaker 22: been able to do by the
01:45:22 Speaker 22: use of being able to generate
01:45:24 Speaker 22: these funds. I think if the
01:45:26 Speaker 22: province were to come to the
01:45:28 Speaker 22: table and reinvigorate funding support that
01:45:30 Speaker 22: they used to provide, now I
01:45:32 Speaker 22: don't think we can expect fifty
01:45:33 Speaker 22: percent, but even if they increased
01:45:35 Speaker 22: it, I'm not convinced that it
01:45:39 Speaker 22: would that the best use would
01:45:41 Speaker 22: be to reduce those self-generated revenues
01:45:47 Speaker 22: or to reduce municipal levy. But
01:45:49 Speaker 22: I think what it could do
01:45:52 Speaker 22: is better earmark those self-generated revenues,
01:45:55 Speaker 22: better contain annual levy increases, and
01:46:00 Speaker 22: at the end of the day,
01:46:03 Speaker 22: also allow for better service provision
01:46:06 Speaker 22: overall, especially in mandatory programming. Thank
01:46:09 Speaker 22: you. Okay, not seeing any hands
01:46:11 Speaker 22: online. We'll go to Councilor Greg
01:46:14 Speaker 22: next. It will culminate in a
01:46:18 Speaker 22: question at the end here, but
01:46:21 Speaker 22: just a few thoughts. I have
01:46:23 Speaker 22: profound disappointment in the government which
01:46:25 Speaker 22: exists right now, Queens Park, that
01:46:28 Speaker 22: doesn't foster an environment where you
01:46:30 Speaker 22: collect the adequate materials and information
01:46:33 Speaker 22: to first make decisions. I don't,
01:46:35 Speaker 22: I can't be convinced that this
01:46:36 Speaker 22: is a problem contributing to the
01:46:40 Speaker 22: lack of housing being built in
01:46:41 Speaker 22: the province. I know I had
01:46:42 Speaker 22: a 30-second elevator pitch with a
01:46:45 Speaker 22: minister a couple years ago, and
01:46:49 Speaker 22: I said, "If you want to
01:46:51 Speaker 22: do something, we have over 3,000
01:46:53 Speaker 22: units pre-approved on our books in
01:46:55 Speaker 22: Owen Sound. You create an economic
01:46:58 Speaker 22: development strategy, residents to Owen Sound.
01:47:03 Speaker 22: We've got the housing approved. We
01:47:04 Speaker 22: have a multitude of pre-approvals and
01:47:06 Speaker 22: permits that are generated already by
01:47:09 Speaker 22: the conservation authority, and we're circulated
01:47:12 Speaker 22: as board members, and we see
01:47:14 Speaker 22: them. So it's not red tape."
01:47:18 Speaker 22: that's in the way. It's already
01:47:22 Speaker 22: approved, and we're just waiting and
01:47:26 Speaker 22: hoping that the shovels will go
01:47:28 Speaker 22: in the ground. So I can't
01:47:29 Speaker 22: be convinced on on this being
01:47:31 Speaker 22: the rationale for for slowing housing
01:47:34 Speaker 22: down. It's not. I am very
01:47:35 Speaker 22: frustrated that the the bill was
01:47:37 Speaker 22: just passed forward, passed through without
01:47:38 Speaker 22: adequate discussion, without all consideration, without
01:47:42 Speaker 22: listening to people across the province.
01:47:44 Speaker 22: and and you know, responding to
01:47:48 Speaker 22: the concerns that they're they're hearing
01:47:51 Speaker 22: at this time, it's poor governance,
01:47:53 Speaker 22: in my opinion, and I'm certainly
01:47:55 Speaker 22: frustrated with our local representatives at
01:47:57 Speaker 22: this time and not being more
01:48:01 Speaker 22: vocal, and and reflecting, I think,
01:48:04 Speaker 22: the communities within Grey County. We
01:48:08 Speaker 22: had a wonderful MPP many years
01:48:11 Speaker 22: ago, and he was very vocal
01:48:15 Speaker 22: at Grey County. He was very
01:48:20 Speaker 22: vocal at Gray County, and he
01:48:22 Speaker 22: would verbally express down there whether
01:48:25 Speaker 22: people liked it or not, the
01:48:26 Speaker 22: opinions and reflect the sentiment of
01:48:29 Speaker 22: this riding. And I think we
01:48:31 Speaker 22: need to see more of that.
01:48:34 Speaker 22: The question I have is, as
01:48:35 Speaker 22: a councillor who has sat many
01:48:37 Speaker 22: years on the Conservation Authority and
01:48:39 Speaker 22: twice been able to chair Gray
01:48:41 Speaker 22: Sable, one of the best resources
01:48:44 Speaker 22: that I can take forward from
01:48:46 Speaker 22: our work, and we've had a.
01:48:49 Speaker 22: presentation, deputation a couple years ago
01:48:59 Speaker 22: about surcharging or discharging into Georgian
01:49:02 Speaker 22: Bay in the town of Blue
01:49:04 Speaker 22: Mountains and concerns of of the
01:49:08 Speaker 22: resident at that time. One of
01:49:10 Speaker 22: the best resources that we get
01:49:12 Speaker 22: as board members are watershed report
01:49:14 Speaker 22: cards, and the watershed report cards
01:49:17 Speaker 22: give us measurables on forest cover,
01:49:19 Speaker 22: on wetlands, and on. Lands and
01:49:21 Speaker 22: on surface water. You can collect
01:49:23 Speaker 45: too much data in the world.
01:49:25 Speaker 45: At times, data does not add
01:49:27 Speaker 45: value. But in this case, the
01:49:28 Speaker 45: watershed report cards did add value,
01:49:31 Speaker 45: and it added really good value.
01:49:34 Speaker 45: Because as a counselor, then I'm
01:49:36 Speaker 45: able to go back to my
01:49:37 Speaker 45: local municipality, and I can respond
01:49:39 Speaker 45: with policy then that's going to
01:49:41 Speaker 45: encourage stronger grades in forest cover,
01:49:42 Speaker 45: in lands, and in surface water.
01:49:44 Speaker 45: and that's the type of
01:49:47 Speaker 45: I have a concern. We've got
01:49:49 Speaker 45: a Bothwell Creek right outside of
01:49:51 Speaker 45: our door here. Surcharges into Georgian
01:49:52 Speaker 45: Bay. The question to staff and
01:49:55 Speaker 45: and to Tim is, how does
01:49:57 Speaker 45: the changes respond and recognize that
01:49:59 Speaker 45: that's an important measurable? That as
01:50:01 Speaker 45: elected officials we can garner very
01:50:03 Speaker 45: quantity. Very quantifiable, measurable data off
01:50:05 Speaker 45: of, and take that and try
01:50:09 Speaker 45: to prescribe it into policy at
01:50:13 Speaker 45: a local level. Will that be
01:50:14 Speaker 45: maintained, or is that at risk
01:50:15 Speaker 45: of being lost? Because right now,
01:50:17 Speaker 45: the forest doesn't have a voice,
01:50:20 Speaker 45: the wetlands don't have a voice,
01:50:22 Speaker 45: and the surface water doesn't have
01:50:24 Speaker 45: a voice. But it gets one
01:50:25 Speaker 45: through items like the watershed report
01:50:27 Speaker 45: cards and being able to respond
01:50:30 Speaker 45: as counselors at a local level.
01:50:31 Speaker 45: in creating policy that does give
01:50:33 Speaker 45: it a voice. Thank you, Madam
01:50:36 Speaker 45: Borden. Thank you for that, Councilor
01:50:40 Speaker 45: Greg. That was excellent. Very well
01:50:42 Speaker 45: said. Again, it's speculation because we
01:50:44 Speaker 45: we simply don't have the information.
01:50:51 Speaker 45: We don't have feasibility assessments, cost
01:50:53 Speaker 45: benefit analysis, anything to support this
01:50:54 Speaker 45: transition. So any thoughts I have
01:50:57 Speaker 45: about the future are simply that
01:51:01 Speaker 45: they're my opinions based on my
01:51:03 Speaker 45: experience. What I can say with
01:51:04 Speaker 48: certainty is that the watershed report
01:51:05 Speaker 48: cards that we produce are part
01:51:06 Speaker 48: of what is considered a category
01:51:07 Speaker 48: three program. So it's based on
01:51:10 Speaker 48: extensive watershed monitoring that we do,
01:51:14 Speaker 48: and and then we wrap that
01:51:16 Speaker 48: up and report back to the
01:51:18 Speaker 48: community so that the community has
01:51:22 Speaker 48: a sense of what is the
01:51:24 Speaker 48: state of the health of the
01:51:27 Speaker 48: watershed in which we live. That's
01:51:29 Speaker 48: Which we live—that's category three programming.
01:51:31 Speaker 48: The province, through previous changes to
01:51:32 Speaker 48: the Conservation Authorities Act, and through
01:51:34 Speaker 48: what we're hearing as the drivers
01:51:37 Speaker 48: for this consolidation, is very, very
01:51:40 Speaker 48: focused on category one. So where
01:51:44 Speaker 48: my concern lies is not one
01:51:47 Speaker 48: or two years down the road,
01:51:48 Speaker 48: but five to ten years down
01:51:50 Speaker 48: the road, as we continue to
01:51:51 Speaker 48: face financial pressures, and our our
01:51:52 Speaker 48: primary drivers, our goals, our category
01:51:55 Speaker 48: one programs, inevitably you get. to
01:51:57 Speaker 48: a point where you have to
01:52:01 Speaker 48: start to squeeze down, and where
01:52:03 Speaker 48: you squeeze is those category three
01:52:05 Speaker 48: program areas. And when those decisions
01:52:09 Speaker 48: are not being made locally again,
01:52:13 Speaker 48: and those decisions are being made
01:52:14 Speaker 48: at a regional level, what's important
01:52:17 Speaker 48: to our local communities could stand
01:52:20 Speaker 48: to be lost when that's how
01:52:21 Speaker 48: those decisions are being made in
01:52:24 Speaker 48: that fashion. So again, that's my
01:52:25 Speaker 48: opinion, but it's based on my
01:52:26 Speaker 48: experience. Thank you. Thank you, and
01:52:29 Speaker 48: I'll invite. General Manager Downing to
01:52:32 Speaker 48: come to the lectern. Thank you,
01:52:37 Speaker 48: Madam Matrasov, and thank you for
01:52:39 Speaker 48: having me and to members of
01:52:42 Speaker 48: council for hearing from me on
01:52:43 Speaker 48: this. Just to support Tim's comments,
01:52:45 Speaker 48: I think what we're seeing, and
01:52:48 Speaker 48: if we, I was going to
01:52:52 Speaker 48: say let's look at this from
01:52:56 Speaker 48: a ten thousand foot lens, but
01:52:58 Speaker 48: we got to go higher. We
01:53:01 Speaker 48: got to go to full UK
01:53:04 Speaker 48: scale. on this, as we heard
01:53:06 Speaker 48: earlier. What what are what what
01:53:06 Speaker 48: are we seeing here? We're seeing
01:53:09 Speaker 48: a proposal that that in supported
01:53:10 Speaker 48: by our Sagiing comments. What is
01:53:12 Speaker 48: drafted by Gray County staff?
01:53:16 Speaker 48: Great report. Is that there is
01:53:18 Speaker 48: a real focus on housing? This
01:53:21 Speaker 48: is the continuing brand, and and
01:53:23 Speaker 48: indeed all of our interest to
01:53:24 Speaker 48: some degree at these types of
01:53:26 Speaker 48: tables, and there is a lot
01:53:27 Speaker 48: of positives. potentially of getting additional
01:53:28 Speaker 48: resources coming to CAs, additional technical
01:53:29 Speaker 48: support coming to CAs, normalization. There
01:53:31 Speaker 48: isn't a lot of negative comments
01:53:32 Speaker 48: coming out of any entity that's
01:53:37 Speaker 48: looking at this from now, and
01:53:40 Speaker 48: that is certainly the number one
01:53:41 Speaker 48: goal of this proposal. The second
01:53:42 Speaker 48: thing that they're proposing here is
01:53:44 Speaker 48: amalgamation, and the amalgamation is is
01:53:46 Speaker 48: much of the concern in in
01:53:48 Speaker 48: this circle and any circle and
01:53:51 Speaker 48: CA circles and county councils. In
01:53:52 Speaker 48: that specifically, we are losing that
01:53:54 Speaker 48: local input and the context of
01:53:57 Speaker 48: CAs, as we heard initially from
01:54:00 Speaker 48: Nile, was was created by local
01:54:02 Speaker 48: municipalities. That's that's the context of
01:54:04 Speaker 48: CAs. It is wiped out in
01:54:05 Speaker 48: this proposal, and not only that
01:54:06 Speaker 48: is it wiped out. They're not
01:54:07 Speaker 48: telling us what it's going to
01:54:09 Speaker 48: cost. Still planning to build those
01:54:12 Speaker 48: member municipalities in in in this
01:54:15 Speaker 48: amalgamation that. really puts in jeopardy,
01:54:18 Speaker 48: I think, the relationship between municipalities
01:54:20 Speaker 48: who have had a significant pay
01:54:20 Speaker 48: for say to this point that
01:54:21 Speaker 48: we don't see how that is
01:54:24 Speaker 48: continuing forward. And then when we
01:54:26 Speaker 48: come to the the the other
01:54:28 Speaker 48: initiatives of CAs in the Category
01:54:30 Speaker 48: Three context, as is your the
01:54:32 Speaker 48: interest in your your comment, Councillor
01:54:33 Speaker 48: Greg, when the municipalities are are
01:54:36 Speaker 48: then put into Municipalities are then
01:54:36 Speaker 48: put into this situation where they're
01:54:38 Speaker 48: having to put all this money
01:54:43 Speaker 48: forward, maybe more money with less
01:54:44 Speaker 48: say, and then it comes time
01:54:46 Speaker 48: for negotiation on a Category Three
01:54:47 Speaker 48: water quality program. Municipality now negotiating
01:54:48 Speaker 48: with a much larger region is
01:54:53 Speaker 48: already undermined and and and spooked
01:54:57 Speaker 48: by a lack of control of
01:54:58 Speaker 48: the investment. They're already having to
01:54:59 Speaker 49: put out to the regional CA
01:55:01 Speaker 49: and ask, "Well, do you want
01:55:04 Speaker 49: to sign up for an allocart
01:55:05 Speaker 49: service such as water quality?" Inevitably,
01:55:07 Speaker 49: yes. Down the road, that
01:55:09 Speaker 50: will get a very close look,
01:55:11 Speaker 50: and it's in great great jeopardy.
01:55:13 Speaker 50: Looking is in great great jeopardy.
01:55:15 Speaker 50: So, excellent point of of of
01:55:17 Speaker 50: concern there. I go as far
01:55:18 Speaker 50: as even to say that there
01:55:19 Speaker 51: are two initiatives here: the permitting
01:55:21 Speaker 51: interest and the housing interest. Is
01:55:24 Speaker 51: if that's first and foremost their
01:55:25 Speaker 51: interest, and and is is somewhat
01:55:28 Speaker 51: getting some support from those that
01:55:30 Speaker 51: are looking and have opportunity to
01:55:31 Speaker 51: comment to this, their amalgamation proposal
01:55:34 Speaker 51: is actually counter to that goal.
01:55:36 Speaker 51: They're and proposing a great deal
01:55:39 Speaker 51: of chaos that would seemingly be.
01:55:41 Speaker 51: oppositional to their main goal, and
01:55:42 Speaker 51: I think that's an opportunity for
01:55:43 Speaker 51: comment. And I think the the
01:55:46 Speaker 51: motions that have been coming forward,
01:55:47 Speaker 51: we very much appreciate them from
01:55:50 Speaker 51: the municipalities and potentially here from
01:55:52 Speaker 51: county, will continue to echo that
01:55:55 Speaker 51: that your your main goal here
01:55:56 Speaker 51: has maybe some some some some
01:55:58 Speaker 51: life. And yes, maybe our keep
01:56:00 Speaker 51: KPIs are already pretty good. We
01:56:02 Speaker 51: can always do better, and we'd
01:56:04 Speaker 51: be interested to. But your second
01:56:05 Speaker 51: goal here is seemingly oppositional to
01:56:06 Speaker 51: that, and and all of the
01:56:09 Speaker 51: concerns and comments almost fall
01:56:11 Speaker 51: off off. Almost, almost fall off
01:56:13 Speaker 51: off of that second goal. Some
01:56:15 Speaker 51: for some reason. So, thank you
01:56:16 Speaker 51: for the opportunity to speak, though,
01:56:19 Speaker 51: and and great conversation. And thanks
01:56:21 Speaker 51: to staff for this report. It's
01:56:24 Speaker 51: it's been excellent to hear. Thank
01:56:27 Speaker 51: you. I do see Director Taylor
01:56:29 Speaker 51: behind you. So, Director Taylor, it
01:56:31 Speaker 51: looks like you have some. You
01:56:33 Speaker 51: must sense that the break is
01:56:39 Speaker 51: next. So, Director Taylor, thought this
01:56:41 Speaker 51: is welcome to the lectern this
01:56:44 Speaker 51: morning. So you're about to morning.
01:56:46 Speaker 51: Yes, I'm happy to. Through your
01:56:48 Speaker 51: bad wording, yes, I'm happy to
01:56:50 Speaker 51: fill time if that's what's needed.
01:56:52 Speaker 29: I would like to thank Deputy
01:56:54 Speaker 29: Cao Niall and and and Tim
01:56:57 Speaker 29: and Eric, and I'd also like
01:56:59 Speaker 29: to thank Samantha Lawson from Grand
01:57:02 Speaker 29: River Conservation Authority and Jennifer Vincent
01:57:03 Speaker 29: from Nevada Sago Valley Conservation Authority.
01:57:05 Speaker 29: They've all played a huge part
01:57:07 Speaker 29: in in bringing forward the information
01:57:08 Speaker 29: that that we heard here today.
01:57:09 Speaker 29: I'd also just like to touch
01:57:11 Speaker 29: on the fact that we we
01:57:14 Speaker 29: held a local planners meeting with
01:57:16 Speaker 29: planners from from across Gray County
01:57:19 Speaker 29: to discuss the Bill 60 changes,
01:57:21 Speaker 29: but also discuss these these Bill
01:57:23 Speaker 29: 68 Discuss these these Bill sixty
01:57:27 Speaker 29: eight proposals and and as we
01:57:29 Speaker 29: heard today, one of the things
01:57:31 Speaker 29: the planners reiterated over and over
01:57:35 Speaker 29: over is is that that local
01:57:37 Speaker 29: context and that local knowledge and
01:57:38 Speaker 29: in some cases, you know, we're
01:57:40 Speaker 29: dealing with with conservation authority staff
01:57:42 Speaker 29: at various levels, not just at
01:57:43 Speaker 29: the planning level that have been
01:57:45 Speaker 29: here for a generation and and
01:57:48 Speaker 29: they understand the local community, they
01:57:49 Speaker 29: understand how the watershed works, but
01:57:50 Speaker 29: they're also highly accessible and and
01:57:52 Speaker 29: a number of the planners shared
01:57:54 Speaker 29: stories about you know listen. We
01:57:56 Speaker 29: had this this this thing come
01:57:57 Speaker 29: up in our community. We had
01:58:00 Speaker 29: this priority application. We really wanted
01:58:02 Speaker 29: to support and and and take
01:58:03 Speaker 29: it through the processes expeditiously as
02:07:28 Speaker 29: possible. The conservation authority was out
02:07:29 Speaker 29: on site with us in two
02:08:16 Speaker 29: days' time, and and so just
02:08:18 Speaker 29: retaining that institutional knowledge and retaining
02:08:20 Speaker 01: that relationship, that ability to pick
02:08:22 Speaker 29: up the phone and know that
02:08:23 Speaker 29: someone can be there within days,
02:08:26 Speaker 29: or sometimes even hours, and and
02:08:31 Speaker 29: certainly on the emergency management side,
02:08:33 Speaker 29: to we've seen that expedient responsiveness.
02:08:35 Speaker 29: and and and those are things
02:08:37 Speaker 29: that we value greatly in in
02:08:39 Speaker 29: the municipal to conservation authority relationship,
02:08:41 Speaker 29: and and we'd hope would be
02:08:44 Speaker 29: maintained in any future restructuring going
02:08:45 Speaker 29: forward. Okay, thank you very much.
02:08:47 Speaker 29: I don't see any further hands
02:08:48 Speaker 29: up, and we are our voices
02:08:51 Speaker 29: are embedded within this report that
02:08:52 Speaker 29: we're considering supporting and asking for
02:08:54 Speaker 29: it to move forward to go
02:08:55 Speaker 29: in front of of both our.
02:08:58 Speaker 29: MPPs as well as our other
02:09:00 Speaker 29: member municipalities and AMO, and of
02:09:02 Speaker 29: course circulating to the conservation authority
02:09:04 Speaker 29: within Grey County, it's not in
02:09:09 Speaker 29: the motion. But I would also
02:09:11 Speaker 29: hope that Minister Thompson would also
02:09:14 Speaker 29: receive a copy of this as
02:09:16 Speaker 29: well, because so much of our
02:09:17 Speaker 29: discussion has been what does
02:09:19 Speaker 29: it mean for the voices of
02:09:22 Speaker 29: the rural communities alongside the larger
02:09:23 Speaker 29: urban areas that we would
02:09:26 Speaker 29: now be participating together with. So,
02:09:28 Speaker 29: all right, I don't see. any
02:09:30 Speaker 29: further hands. I'll call the question.
02:09:32 Speaker 29: Then all those in favor. Excellent.
02:09:34 Speaker 29: Okay, and that is. I would
02:09:36 Speaker 29: say that would. That's actually unanimously
02:09:37 Speaker 29: passed. All right. Thank you again,
02:09:39 Speaker 29: virtual our guests who have provided
02:09:42 Speaker 29: that extra information. As you can
02:09:43 Speaker 29: see, your presence was very well
02:09:46 Speaker 29: valued. We had a lot of
02:09:47 Speaker 29: questions for you, and we appreciate
02:09:50 Speaker 29: the opportunity to speak directly with
02:09:52 Speaker 29: you. Thank you. Okay. So with
02:09:56 Speaker 29: that, we are going to do.
02:09:57 Speaker 29: a ten-minute break. We'll be back
02:09:59 Speaker 29: here at twelve. Four different items
02:10:01 Speaker 29: to go on our agenda, and
02:10:05 Speaker 29: then lunch will be at twelve
02:10:06 Speaker 29: thirty. So we are hoping that
02:10:08 Speaker 29: we can move expeditiously through the
02:10:09 Speaker 29: others. So see everybody back in
02:10:12 Speaker 29: their seats at twelve o'clock. Thank
02:10:18 Speaker 29: you. I could invite all the
02:10:19 Speaker 29: committee, the whole members, back to
02:10:21 Speaker 29: their seats, please. Thank you. Okay,
02:10:26 Speaker 29: we have the nod from communications
02:10:27 Speaker 29: that we are ready to continue.
02:10:40 Speaker 29: Going to what we're going to
02:10:41 Speaker 29: do from this point forward, actually,
02:10:43 Speaker 29: is we've taken care of this
02:10:44 Speaker 29: one. Okay, so what we're going
02:10:46 Speaker 29: to propose at this point in
02:10:47 Speaker 29: time, in discussion with the clerk,
02:10:49 Speaker 29: in terms of timing before and
02:10:51 Speaker 29: after lunch, item seven C is
02:10:56 Speaker 29: the one that will require more
02:10:57 Speaker 29: discussion, a complete presentation. So it
02:11:01 Speaker 29: would. be best to do that
02:11:06 Speaker 29: one fresh after lunch, which would
02:11:08 Speaker 52: allow us to go to item
02:11:12 Speaker 52: seven D and seven E, and
02:11:13 Speaker 28: we'll see where we are in
02:11:15 Speaker 28: terms of seven F prior to
02:11:18 Speaker 28: lunch. So if we could please
02:11:21 Speaker 28: turn our our attention over to
02:11:24 Speaker 28: item seven D, and this is
02:11:25 Speaker 28: with regards to the Hanover Westray
02:11:27 Speaker 28: proposed boundary adjustment, and it's recommended
02:11:29 Speaker 28: that CAO that so it's recommended
02:11:31 Speaker 28: that report CAO R C W
02:11:32 Speaker 28: twenty twenty five regarding 2025 regarding
02:11:34 Speaker 28: the boundary adjustment proposal between Hanover
02:11:39 Speaker 28: and West Grey be received, and
02:11:43 Speaker 28: that the county agrees supports the
02:11:46 Speaker 28: restructuring proposal between the municipality of
02:11:48 Speaker 28: West Grey and the town of
02:11:50 Speaker 28: Hanover, subject to restructuring
02:11:53 Speaker 28: agreement being approved by the respective
02:11:55 Speaker 28: councils that would see lands transferred
02:11:57 Speaker 28: from the municipality of West Grey
02:12:00 Speaker 28: to the town of Hanover, and
02:12:01 Speaker 28: that correspondence be provided to the
02:12:03 Speaker 28: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
02:12:04 Speaker 28: the town of Hanover, and the
02:12:08 Speaker 28: municipality of West Grey expressing such
02:12:10 Speaker 28: support and. that action be taken
02:12:14 Speaker 28: prior to council approval, as per
02:12:16 Speaker 28: Section twenty six point six b
02:12:18 Speaker 28: of the procedural bylaw fifty one
02:12:21 Speaker 28: thirty four twenty two. May
02:12:23 Speaker 28: ask for a mover and a
02:12:26 Speaker 28: seconder. So we okay. Well, we've
02:12:28 Speaker 28: got a move by Councillor Patterson.
02:12:31 Speaker 28: I've got it seconded over here
02:12:33 Speaker 28: by Councillor McKay. If that's okay,
02:12:35 Speaker 28: Councillor Eccles. Okay. All right. It's
02:12:38 Speaker 28: on the floor for discussion at
02:12:40 Speaker 28: this point in time. Then, so
02:12:43 Speaker 28: then I will then. invite Director
02:12:44 Speaker 28: Taylor if you would like to
02:12:47 Speaker 28: begin, or I have your name
02:12:50 Speaker 28: as the as the contact. So,
02:12:51 Speaker 28: or would the CAO? Okay, I'll
02:12:58 Speaker 28: invite senior management to come now
02:13:00 Speaker 28: and make a presentation or discussion
02:13:03 Speaker 28: introduction. Okay. To be fair, it's
02:13:05 Speaker 28: because we we juggled things around,
02:13:08 Speaker 28: did a bit of a domino
02:13:10 Speaker 28: shift here in terms of our
02:13:12 Speaker 28: agenda items. So, seeing that
02:13:13 Speaker 28: we are now discussing Hanover and
02:13:17 Speaker 28: West Gray, we'll look to the
02:13:18 Speaker 28: CAO for that introduction. Thank you.
02:13:23 Speaker 28: Thank you very much, Warden Matriscals,
02:13:26 Speaker 28: and I got caught multitasking there.
02:13:27 Speaker 28: So, good afternoon, County Council. So,
02:13:29 Speaker 28: this report provides an overview of
02:13:32 Speaker 28: the. missile boundary construction proposal between
02:13:34 Speaker 28: Hanover and West Gray. This presentation,
02:13:37 Speaker 28: I'll just note, is adapted from
02:13:39 Speaker 28: a presentation that was delivered at
02:13:41 Speaker 28: the November 19th public meeting that
02:13:43 Speaker 28: was held jointly in Elma by
02:13:47 Speaker 28: both municipalities. So today, I'll just
02:13:49 Speaker 28: summarize some of the background of
02:13:53 Speaker 28: the proposal, the lands that are
02:13:55 Speaker 28: in question, the financial terms, some
02:13:57 Speaker 28: of the benefits that we think
02:13:59 Speaker 28: will be achieved by this proposal,
02:14:02 Speaker 28: some of the public feedback received.
02:14:05 Speaker 28: and next slide, please, or can
02:14:07 Speaker 28: I do that? Please. So, council
02:14:09 Speaker 28: may some councilors may recall back
02:14:13 Speaker 28: in 2021, county council directed staff
02:14:14 Speaker 28: to work with interested member municipalities
02:14:16 Speaker 28: on facilitating discussions on future growth
02:14:18 Speaker 28: and infrastructure needs where two or
02:14:20 Speaker 28: more municipal boundaries are involved. During
02:14:23 Speaker 28: this term of council, Hannah and
02:14:26 Speaker 28: West Gray have worked together on
02:14:28 Speaker 28: a plan intended to achieve mutual.
02:14:33 Speaker 28: benefits for both communities and the
02:14:35 Speaker 28: overall region, this was initially triggered
02:14:38 Speaker 28: by comprehensive review work completed by
02:14:40 Speaker 28: Hanover, and which noted that the
02:14:43 Speaker 28: commercial employment lands by 2046, which
02:14:44 Speaker 28: was the current growth horizon at
02:14:46 Speaker 28: that time. Since 2023, representatives from
02:14:51 Speaker 28: both municipalities and Gray County have
02:14:59 Speaker 28: discussed options to support growth and
02:15:00 Speaker 28: shared prosperity. Gray County has helped
02:15:02 Speaker 28: to facilitate assist with provide. To
02:15:05 Speaker 28: facilitate and assist with providing some
02:15:06 Speaker 28: research and background information to help
02:15:08 Speaker 28: inform some of those conversations,
02:15:11 Speaker 28: a working group was established, including
02:15:13 Speaker 28: the mayors from both municipalities, as
02:15:17 Speaker 28: well as a council member from
02:15:19 Speaker 28: each municipality, and has met regularly
02:15:21 Speaker 28: throughout this council term. The working
02:15:23 Speaker 28: group explored a number of options
02:15:25 Speaker 28: and recommended a boundary adjustment. Both
02:15:27 Speaker 28: West Grey and Henry councils have
02:15:29 Speaker 28: supported in principle. this boundary adjustment.
02:15:31 Speaker 28: A memorandum of understanding has been
02:15:33 Speaker 28: executed between the two municipalities to
02:15:35 Speaker 28: establishing a restructuring framework and to
02:15:41 Speaker 28: proceed under the Municipal Act towards
02:15:43 Speaker 28: a formal boundary adjustment agreement for
02:15:45 Speaker 28: council's consideration. As noted, both councils
02:15:48 Speaker 28: held a joint public meeting on
02:15:50 Speaker 28: November nineteenth, twenty twenty-five, in Elmwood.
02:15:53 Speaker 28: So the lands, what what what
02:15:55 Speaker 28: what lands are being considered with
02:15:57 Speaker 28: respect to this proposal? So the
02:16:00 Speaker 28: agreement proposal. So the agreement proposes
02:16:02 Speaker 28: to transfer and adjust certain lands
02:16:04 Speaker 28: from West Gray to Hanover. In
02:16:06 Speaker 28: total, just over one thousand six
02:16:07 Speaker 28: hundred, or approximately six and one
02:16:08 Speaker 28: thousand six hundred thirty-four acres, situated
02:16:10 Speaker 28: to the north and east of
02:16:12 Speaker 28: Hanover's existing boundaries. Here's a map
02:16:14 Speaker 28: which shows the the lands that
02:16:17 Speaker 28: are shown in the burgundy color.
02:16:19 Speaker 28: The two main areas proposed in
02:16:23 Speaker 28: terms of being added to the
02:16:24 Speaker 28: town of Hanover. called the Northlands,
02:16:26 Speaker 28: which are east of Graver's Line,
02:16:27 Speaker 28: north of Gray Road 28, and
02:16:31 Speaker 28: then a large pocket that is
02:16:32 Speaker 28: south of Gray Road 4 and
02:16:36 Speaker 28: primarily east of of Gray Road
02:16:39 Speaker 28: 28. And then there's also the
02:16:41 Speaker 28: Bucks Crossing former golf course lands
02:16:43 Speaker 28: north of Gray Road 4,
02:16:45 Speaker 28: as well as a small portion
02:16:47 Speaker 28: that has the Hanover Rail Trail
02:16:51 Speaker 28: that runs through that portion, which
02:16:53 Speaker 28: would then keep that asset. within,
02:16:55 Speaker 28: completely within the town of Hanover.
02:16:57 Speaker 28: This map shows the air photos
02:17:00 Speaker 28: of them, so the areas outlined
02:17:02 Speaker 28: in red are the lands that
02:17:06 Speaker 28: would be added to the town
02:17:09 Speaker 28: of Hanover, subject to, of course,
02:17:13 Speaker 28: the minister approving that restructuring order
02:17:14 Speaker 28: and subject to both municipal councils
02:17:17 Speaker 28: finalizing the agreement. It should be
02:17:19 Speaker 28: noted that the lands proposed to
02:17:21 Speaker 28: be added to Hanover go beyond
02:17:23 Speaker 28: the growth needs of the current
02:17:25 Speaker 28: planning horizon, and these additional lands
02:17:28 Speaker 28: will allow Hanover to plan for
02:17:31 Speaker 28: the long-term growth and infrastructure needs.
02:17:33 Speaker 28: Development within the affected lands will
02:17:34 Speaker 28: be phased over years. So, recognizing
02:17:37 Speaker 28: West Gray would no longer receive
02:17:40 Speaker 28: assessment from the transferred lands, or
02:17:42 Speaker 28: receive any increased assessment based on
02:17:45 Speaker 28: the future growth. that would occur
02:17:48 Speaker 28: on these lands, the two municipalities
02:17:51 Speaker 28: have agreed in principle that Hanover
02:17:53 Speaker 28: will provide ten million dollars in
02:17:56 Speaker 28: financial compensation that we paid as
02:17:58 Speaker 28: five hundred thousand dollars per year
02:18:04 Speaker 28: over a twenty-year period. In terms
02:18:06 Speaker 28: of other considerations, there is no
02:18:10 Speaker 28: specific development that's planned at this
02:18:11 Speaker 28: time on on these lands. Future
02:18:13 Speaker 28: development is expected to include a
02:18:16 Speaker 28: mixture of commercial, industrial, and residential
02:18:18 Speaker 28: uses. There is no obligation for
02:18:21 Speaker 28: any property owner to develop their
02:18:23 Speaker 28: land, and the working group and
02:18:26 Speaker 28: both councils have been right up
02:18:31 Speaker 28: front in saying that farming can
02:18:33 Speaker 28: continue. And the rights of existing
02:18:36 Speaker 28: farmers, if they want to continue
02:18:37 Speaker 28: to farm the land, will be
02:18:44 Speaker 28: able to do so for
02:18:47 Speaker 28: as long as they wish to
02:18:50 Speaker 28: continue to do that. All landowners
02:18:51 Speaker 28: will maintain their right, based on
02:18:54 Speaker 28: their existing uses, that they use
02:18:56 Speaker 28: those properties for as long as
02:18:58 Speaker 28: they they so choose. and that
02:19:01 Speaker 28: was that was something that was
02:19:03 Speaker 28: definitely stressed by both both municipalities
02:19:06 Speaker 28: as well as the working group
02:19:12 Speaker 28: right from day one. In terms
02:19:14 Speaker 28: of some of the benefits for
02:19:15 Speaker 28: the restructuring proposal for West Grey,
02:19:17 Speaker 28: the compensation that Hanover will be
02:19:20 Speaker 28: providing back to West Grey can
02:19:24 Speaker 28: be reinvested to support things like
02:19:27 Speaker 28: infrastructure service level enhancements for
02:19:31 Speaker 28: the benefit of West Grey residents.
02:19:32 Speaker 28: we anticipate where we see growth
02:19:34 Speaker 28: in terms of employment land growth
02:19:37 Speaker 28: and commercial land growth. There's usually
02:19:39 Speaker 28: a spinoff growth effect in neighboring
02:19:42 Speaker 28: municipalities, so we anticipate that will
02:19:45 Speaker 28: happen as well within residential
02:19:47 Speaker 28: industrial sectors. And new Hanover development
02:19:52 Speaker 28: translates to new services amenities that
02:19:54 Speaker 28: benefit residents in both municipalities. And
02:19:58 Speaker 28: this goes to the notion that
02:20:00 Speaker 28: in some cases, a person.
02:20:02 Speaker 28: a family may live in in
02:20:05 Speaker 28: one community. May their kids may
02:20:07 Speaker 28: go to a school and
02:20:10 Speaker 28: play play sports in another
02:20:12 Speaker 28: community. They may access services and
02:20:15 Speaker 28: commercial needs in a completely different
02:20:17 Speaker 28: community. There's in some cases there's
02:20:18 Speaker 28: no missal boundaries when you're accessing
02:20:20 Speaker 28: those types of services, and so
02:20:26 Speaker 28: that's where again everyone benefits from
02:20:28 Speaker 28: from some of those services and
02:20:31 Speaker 28: amenities being added throughout all of
02:20:33 Speaker 28: our communities. In terms of Hannah.
02:20:36 Speaker 28: In terms of Hanover benefits, for
02:20:38 Speaker 28: Hanover, the adjustment delivers long-term land
02:20:41 Speaker 28: supply to support future commercial, industrial,
02:20:43 Speaker 28: and residential uses. That growth yields
02:20:48 Speaker 28: new assessment and taxes and creates
02:20:50 Speaker 28: jobs and homes for the region.
02:20:52 Speaker 28: For Gray County, development brings potentially
02:20:54 Speaker 28: new revenue through new tax assessment.
02:20:56 Speaker 28: There would be potentially, as development
02:21:00 Speaker 28: happens on those lands, and assuming
02:21:03 Speaker 28: that development charges still exist, that
02:21:03 Speaker 28: those can be used to help
02:21:05 Speaker 28: enhance services to support that new
02:21:06 Speaker 28: growth. It also helps to deliver
02:21:09 Speaker 28: jobs and housing for residents throughout
02:21:12 Speaker 28: the region. Sorry, this positions South
02:21:14 Speaker 28: Grey as a vibrant economic zone
02:21:15 Speaker 28: with shovel-ready lands available for development,
02:21:18 Speaker 28: which aligns really well with our
02:21:20 Speaker 28: economic development, tourism, culture master plan.
02:21:21 Speaker 28: Other considerations. So, properties entering Hanover
02:21:23 Speaker 28: would pay Hanover's tax rate, which
02:21:27 Speaker 28: is slightly higher than West Grey's
02:21:30 Speaker 28: rate, and therefore Hanover is committed
02:21:32 Speaker 28: to phasing in these tax increases
02:21:35 Speaker 28: over five years to help ease
02:21:38 Speaker 28: that transition. Hanover will provide most
02:21:40 Speaker 28: services to the lands, including police,
02:21:42 Speaker 28: fire, bylaw, library, parks, recreation and
02:21:49 Speaker 28: culture, and waste management. So, in
02:21:52 Speaker 28: terms of the comments received, both
02:21:53 Speaker 28: at the public meeting as well
02:21:56 Speaker 28: as comments in writing, residents requested
02:21:58 Speaker 28: clarification on property impacts, tax implications,
02:22:00 Speaker 28: and service changes. There was concerns
02:22:02 Speaker 28: including the increased taxes, traffic, subdivision
02:22:04 Speaker 28: activity, and commercial development. We heard
02:22:05 Speaker 28: questions about whether hunting would still
02:22:08 Speaker 28: be permitted after the lands become
02:22:10 Speaker 28: part of Hanover. There were
02:22:13 Speaker 28: suggestions to reevaluate the proposal, consider
02:22:15 Speaker 28: other. alternatives. Ensure the tax base
02:22:18 Speaker 28: isn't affected, especially around water sewer
02:22:21 Speaker 28: connection requirements or financial supports for
02:22:23 Speaker 28: affected residents. Some landers stated that
02:22:25 Speaker 28: they're they're just not interested in
02:22:26 Speaker 28: urban development and and were opposing
02:22:30 Speaker 28: the restructuring proposal. Others asked for
02:22:34 Speaker 28: clarification regarding benefits for both municipalities
02:22:38 Speaker 28: and property owners, and for detail
02:22:40 Speaker 28: on the financial modeling and assessment
02:22:43 Speaker 28: reports. Soggy Valley Conservation Authority expressed
02:22:45 Speaker 28: support for responsible growth, did recommend
02:22:47 Speaker 28: updates of floodplain mapping and review
02:22:50 Speaker 28: of erosion hazards and wetlands, which
02:22:53 Speaker 28: could be captured as part of
02:22:55 Speaker 28: the future future phases through the
02:22:57 Speaker 28: planning processes. And then there was
02:22:59 Speaker 28: also questions about next steps. So
02:23:02 Speaker 28: in terms of next steps, so
02:23:04 Speaker 28: today obviously this report is before
02:23:07 Speaker 28: County Council. The minister does require.
02:23:10 Speaker 28: the upper-tier municipality through a restructuring
02:23:15 Speaker 28: proposal to to indicate whether it
02:23:16 Speaker 28: supports that restructuring proposal between two
02:23:18 Speaker 28: municipalities. Reports will also be presented
02:23:21 Speaker 28: to Hanover Council. We understand on
02:23:24 Speaker 28: December 15th and December 16th, so
02:23:25 Speaker 28: next week, regarding the actual restructuring
02:23:27 Speaker 28: agreement that is being finalized as
02:23:29 Speaker 28: as we speak. As part of
02:23:33 Speaker 28: those reports, the councils of Hanover
02:23:35 Speaker 28: and West Grey will review all
02:23:37 Speaker 28: the comments received during the council.
02:23:39 Speaker 28: Received during the consultation process and
02:23:40 Speaker 28: carefully consider that that boundary adjustment
02:23:43 Speaker 28: agreement. Should both councils approve the
02:23:45 Speaker 28: agreement, the next step will be
02:23:46 Speaker 28: to prepare and submit a formal
02:23:47 Speaker 28: restructuring proposal to the to the
02:23:49 Speaker 28: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
02:23:51 Speaker 28: which is targeted to be submitted
02:23:53 Speaker 28: either by the end of this
02:23:56 Speaker 28: year or early 2026. Following review,
02:24:03 Speaker 28: the minister may approve the agreement
02:24:05 Speaker 28: via restructuring order under the Municipal
02:24:07 Speaker 28: Act. If the minister does the
02:24:09 Speaker 28: restructuring order, after that order, Hanover
02:24:11 Speaker 28: and Gray County would complete official
02:24:13 Speaker 20: plan and conference of zoning bylaw
02:24:14 Speaker 20: updates. As noted earlier, the ministry
02:24:17 Speaker 20: does require the upper tier municipality
02:24:19 Speaker 20: to indicate whether they support the
02:24:20 Speaker 20: restructuring proposal. Given that both municipal
02:24:22 Speaker 20: councils have supported this boundary adjustment
02:24:24 Speaker 20: in principle, the potential benefits that
02:24:26 Speaker 20: will be achieved as a result
02:24:31 Speaker 20: of this restructuring. proposal, as well
02:24:34 Speaker 20: as the commitment to mitigate any
02:24:36 Speaker 20: potential impacts to property owners within
02:24:39 Speaker 20: the lands, it's recommended that County
02:24:41 Speaker 20: Council support this restructuring proposal, subject
02:24:43 Speaker 20: to both municipal councils approving the
02:24:45 Speaker 20: restructuring agreement. You have the motion
02:24:47 Speaker 53: that's in the report. Before I
02:24:51 Speaker 53: do, before I go to the
02:24:53 Speaker 53: motion and before open up to
02:24:55 Speaker 53: questions, just want to say, like
02:24:57 Speaker 53: in terms of the the the
02:24:59 Speaker 53: work. with both Hanover staff, Westray
02:25:01 Speaker 53: staff, has been absolutely amazing. The
02:25:03 Speaker 53: both mayors and the two council
02:25:06 Speaker 53: representatives on the working group. There's
02:25:08 Speaker 53: been a lot of meetings and
02:25:10 Speaker 53: and great discussions throughout those last
02:25:12 Speaker 53: two years. And and the working
02:25:13 Speaker 53: group always had the focus of
02:25:15 Speaker 53: making sure that any potential impacts
02:25:17 Speaker 53: that could come to this are
02:25:20 Speaker 53: mitigated to the best extent possible.
02:25:27 Speaker 53: I also want to. thank county
02:25:31 Speaker 53: staff that have been involved throughout
02:25:33 Speaker 53: this process. Director Scott Taylor has
02:25:35 Speaker 53: been instrumental as part of this
02:25:37 Speaker 54: process. Jaclyn Morrison, our our county
02:25:39 Speaker 54: solicitor, has been involved with this.
02:25:42 Speaker 54: Tara Water, our clerk, has been
02:25:44 Speaker 29: involved throughout this. Rob Hatton, our
02:25:47 Speaker 29: our communications manager, Carolyn Bailey, who
02:25:49 Speaker 29: is our planning technician, has helped
02:25:53 Speaker 29: with some of the mapping work
02:25:54 Speaker 29: with respect to this project. Lacey
02:25:55 Speaker 29: Thompson is also helping, as we
02:25:58 Speaker 29: speak, to to make sure the
02:26:00 Speaker 29: legal descriptions on the lands reflect
02:26:04 Speaker 29: what the ministry needs, and is
02:26:05 Speaker 29: working through some of those pieces
02:26:07 Speaker 29: as well. So, I'm I'm sure
02:26:08 Speaker 29: I'm missing some folks in terms
02:26:10 Speaker 29: of thanking for for all the
02:26:13 Speaker 29: work on this, but it's been
02:26:16 Speaker 29: a true team effort, and and
02:26:18 Speaker 29: I think is a great example
02:26:20 Speaker 29: of what Team Gray can be
02:26:23 Speaker 29: all about when we work
02:26:25 Speaker 29: work together to to achieve economic
02:26:28 Speaker 29: success. Okay, thank you very much
02:26:29 Speaker 29: for that introduction. And indeed, it
02:26:31 Speaker 29: is an example of a trio
02:26:34 Speaker 29: of teams working together, and how
02:26:36 Speaker 29: we can be a benefit to
02:26:38 Speaker 29: help with all those negotiations that
02:26:42 Speaker 29: have gone on, and all the
02:26:43 Speaker 29: expertise you just listed of the
02:26:45 Speaker 29: county staff as well as the
02:26:48 Speaker 29: town, each of the town staff
02:26:50 Speaker 29: as well. All right. So with
02:26:54 Speaker 29: that, then it is on the
02:26:56 Speaker 29: floor for questions. and comments. We'll
02:26:58 Speaker 29: begin with Councillor Mackey. Thank you,
02:26:59 Speaker 29: Warden, and good afternoon, fellow Council
02:27:01 Speaker 55: members. I'd just like to congratulate
02:27:04 Speaker 55: both Hanover and West Gray. This
02:27:05 Speaker 55: has been a long process. It's
02:27:07 Speaker 06: been going on for an extremely
02:27:09 Speaker 06: long time, and to the Planning
02:27:10 Speaker 06: Department, Randy, to all the staff
02:27:12 Speaker 06: that you mentioned, helping facilitate this,
02:27:14 Speaker 06: arbitrate, whatever word you want to.
02:27:16 Speaker 06: use, yours. But it's a really
02:27:20 Speaker 06: good news story for all of
02:27:22 Speaker 06: Gray County, not just for Hanover
02:27:24 Speaker 06: and West Gray, but the entire
02:27:26 Speaker 06: Gray County. As you mentioned, Randy,
02:27:27 Speaker 06: the municipal boundaries are don't really
02:27:29 Speaker 06: matter to the individual person that's
02:27:32 Speaker 06: working in Hanover, working in West
02:27:33 Speaker 06: Gray, living in one municipality or
02:27:35 Speaker 06: the other. It's going to bring
02:27:36 Speaker 06: growth to the southern part, and
02:27:37 Speaker 06: that's good for all of us.
02:27:40 Speaker 06: So, congratulations, Hanover and West Gray.
02:27:42 Speaker 06: Okay. Thank you. And any other
02:27:44 Speaker 06: questions or comments? And it was
02:27:46 Speaker 06: good, good discussion at the at
02:27:48 Speaker 06: the Agricultural Advisory Committee this week
02:27:50 Speaker 06: too. You made the same presentation,
02:27:52 Speaker 06: and and there was a good
02:27:54 Speaker 06: lens of of input from there.
02:27:55 Speaker 06: And the process continues to take
02:27:57 Speaker 06: on people's input along the way,
02:27:59 Speaker 06: the way that it's been outlined
02:28:02 Speaker 06: in the report. Okay. excellent. So
02:28:04 Speaker 06: with that, then I see no
02:28:06 Speaker 06: further hands up. Then I will
02:28:08 Speaker 06: call the vote. Then all those
02:28:10 Speaker 06: in favor, and that motion is
02:28:11 Speaker 06: carried. Thank you very much. See
02:28:14 Speaker 06: you. Okay, looks like we've got
02:28:16 Speaker 06: time to do one more item,
02:28:18 Speaker 06: 7E. So I'd like to invite
02:28:20 Speaker 06: Director Myers up, and it's recommended
02:28:21 Speaker 06: that Report E D T C
02:28:23 Speaker 06: C W 1725 regarding the Team
02:28:25 Speaker 06: Gray Memorandum of Understanding be received,
02:28:27 Speaker 06: and that Gray County Council endorse.
02:28:28 Speaker 06: the Team Gray Memorandum of Understanding
02:28:31 Speaker 06: as presented, to support regional economic
02:28:35 Speaker 06: development and investment readiness, and that
02:28:37 Speaker 06: the clerk of the the warden
02:28:39 Speaker 06: and the clerk be authorized to
02:28:41 Speaker 06: sign the Team Gray MOU, and
02:28:42 Speaker 06: that this report, including the Team
02:28:44 Speaker 06: Gray MOU, be circulated to all
02:28:45 Speaker 06: Gray County member municipalities for consideration,
02:28:47 Speaker 06: and signing. So, with that, may
02:28:49 Speaker 06: I ask for a mover? Move
02:28:51 Speaker 06: by Councilor Kentner, seconded by Councilor
02:28:53 Speaker 06: Dobreen. It's now. Mr. Dubrin, it's
02:28:55 Speaker 06: now on the floor for discussion.
02:28:57 Speaker 06: So, welcome, Director Myers. Excellent. Thank
02:28:58 Speaker 06: you so much, Warden, and good
02:29:00 Speaker 06: afternoon, County Council. Just there we
02:29:02 Speaker 06: go, flipping our screens around a
02:29:04 Speaker 06: little bit. I've got a presentation
02:29:06 Speaker 06: to go along with the MOU.
02:29:07 Speaker 06: There's a lot in this report
02:29:08 Speaker 06: and attachments, so I'm going to
02:29:12 Speaker 06: focus on the high levels of
02:29:15 Speaker 06: why, how did we get to
02:29:16 Speaker 06: this stage, and how was this
02:29:17 Speaker 06: developed, and then take you through
02:29:18 Speaker 06: the draft MOU so that you
02:29:20 Speaker 06: know what it encompasses. So the
02:29:21 Speaker 06: Team Gray MOU, this was recommended
02:29:22 Speaker 06: in 2023 through the development of
02:29:26 Speaker 06: the Economic Development, Tourism, and Culture
02:29:28 Speaker 06: Master Plan, and it fit under
02:29:29 Speaker 06: Priority Number One of Leadership and
02:29:30 Speaker 06: Collaboration, where we work together to
02:29:32 Speaker 06: build cohesion. Talking about how Gray
02:29:35 Speaker 06: County takes a regional approach to
02:29:36 Speaker 06: economic development, tourism, and culture, working
02:29:37 Speaker 06: on behalf of all nine of
02:29:38 Speaker 06: our member municipalities. Is everything that
02:29:40 Speaker 06: we do happens in our municipalities,
02:29:42 Speaker 06: in your municipalities, for our people.
02:29:42 Speaker 06: So the top priority. is building
02:29:44 Speaker 06: Team Gray, where we focus on
02:29:46 Speaker 06: collaboration, not competition, to build trust
02:29:47 Speaker 06: and to seed success. So collectively,
02:29:48 Speaker 06: we know that we carry a
02:29:50 Speaker 06: stronger voice and we have a
02:29:51 Speaker 06: better likelihood of achieving those goals
02:29:54 Speaker 06: more effectively, efficiently, and in a
02:29:56 Speaker 06: timely manner with fewer resources required,
02:29:59 Speaker 06: most likely. And we also understand
02:30:00 Speaker 06: that a cohesive vision followed by
02:30:01 Speaker 06: effective and true collaboration is going
02:30:03 Speaker 06: to benefit us all. So you
02:30:05 Speaker 06: see it here in priority number
02:30:06 Speaker 06: one. It is 1.4 development. 1.4
02:30:08 Speaker 06: developed the team gray memorandum of
02:30:10 Speaker 06: understanding, and what you see on
02:30:12 Speaker 06: this slide, this is everything that
02:30:13 Speaker 06: this team gray MOU applies to
02:30:15 Speaker 06: right now. It could apply to
02:30:16 Speaker 06: so many things, but for right
02:30:18 Speaker 06: now, in this very first iteration
02:30:19 Speaker 06: of the MOU, we are focusing
02:30:22 Speaker 06: very much on priority one and
02:30:25 Speaker 06: two of the EDTC master plan.
02:30:26 Speaker 06: This truly is a made in
02:30:28 Speaker 06: gray approach. This is, you know,
02:30:29 Speaker 06: a phrase that we use quite
02:30:30 Speaker 06: often, and we really truly mean
02:30:33 Speaker 06: it. when we talk about the
02:30:36 Speaker 06: made in gray approach. This is
02:30:37 Speaker 06: an opportunity to formalize the collaboration
02:30:38 Speaker 06: that we're already doing. It celebrates
02:30:39 Speaker 06: and holds on to who we
02:30:44 Speaker 06: are, both as individually and collectively,
02:30:46 Speaker 06: while we plan and grow together.
02:30:47 Speaker 06: And that individual and collective is
02:30:49 Speaker 06: really important in this. So you'll
02:30:51 Speaker 06: see the the note on here
02:30:53 Speaker 06: where it says local priorities and
02:30:54 Speaker 06: character have an important
02:30:56 Speaker 06: role to play. Our regional strength
02:30:59 Speaker 06: comes from the collection of nine
02:31:01 Speaker 06: unique member municipalities. So encouraged through
02:31:03 Speaker 06: this or any of the work
02:31:05 Speaker 06: that we're doing is the same
02:31:06 Speaker 06: everywhere. Gray County loses its its
02:31:08 Speaker 06: excitement and its draw and the
02:31:10 Speaker 06: ability for us to sell the
02:31:12 Speaker 06: region to people who are here
02:31:14 Speaker 06: or people who want to come
02:31:15 Speaker 06: here. If we're all the same,
02:31:17 Speaker 06: so we want to hold on
02:31:18 Speaker 06: to that local knowledge, that local
02:31:21 Speaker 06: drive, the character and the priorities
02:31:23 Speaker 06: that mean something to you on
02:31:24 Speaker 06: the ground. When we wrap those
02:31:26 Speaker 06: all up into one, we have
02:31:29 Speaker 06: a really impressive Gray County to
02:31:30 Speaker 06: look at. So doing this together,
02:31:33 Speaker 06: it helps us to decide what
02:31:34 Speaker 06: we want the county as a
02:31:36 Speaker 06: whole to. look like, and allows
02:31:37 Speaker 06: us to take a proactive
02:31:39 Speaker 06: and collaborative approach, so that we
02:31:42 Speaker 06: can get there in a sustainable
02:31:45 Speaker 06: way. We want to be able
02:31:47 Speaker 06: to decide collectively what that growth
02:31:49 Speaker 06: looks like. We don't want it
02:31:51 Speaker 06: to just happen to us. We
02:31:52 Speaker 06: want you to have a vision,
02:31:53 Speaker 06: so that we can support that.
02:31:54 Speaker 06: So the team for MOU has
02:31:56 Speaker 06: two very distinct parts. They're related,
02:31:58 Speaker 06: but they're distinct. So the first
02:32:00 Speaker 06: one is the MOU that is
02:32:02 Speaker 06: shared here today through this report
02:32:03 Speaker 06: that we're proposing applies equally to
02:32:04 Speaker 06: us as the county and to
02:32:06 Speaker 06: all nine of our member municipalities.
02:32:08 Speaker 06: where the annual project work plans
02:32:10 Speaker 06: that accompany the MOU, those are
02:32:11 Speaker 06: specific to your municipalities in the
02:32:13 Speaker 06: county. It may be one
02:32:15 Speaker 06: municipality in the county, it
02:32:17 Speaker 06: may be multiple, as the example
02:32:18 Speaker 06: we just saw here with Hanover
02:32:21 Speaker 06: and West Grey. What a great
02:32:22 Speaker 06: example of Team Grey! So, some
02:32:24 Speaker 06: municipalities may choose to opt out
02:32:26 Speaker 06: of projects specific because they don't
02:32:28 Speaker 06: have the resources. There's not a
02:32:30 Speaker 06: certain priority in a given year,
02:32:32 Speaker 06: and that's okay. This just enables
02:32:33 Speaker 06: us to have a shared understanding
02:32:34 Speaker 06: of what what those projects. might
02:32:35 Speaker 06: be, what our rules and responsibilities
02:32:36 Speaker 06: might be in it, and what
02:32:38 Speaker 06: the timeline and commitment looks like.
02:32:42 Speaker 06: So why an MOU? We're really
02:32:43 Speaker 06: fortunate to have great working relationships
02:32:45 Speaker 06: here between Grey County and our
02:32:46 Speaker 06: member municipalities. We know it is
02:32:47 Speaker 06: not like that everywhere, so we
02:32:48 Speaker 06: are very very fortunate, and we
02:32:49 Speaker 06: see this as an opportunity to
02:32:50 Speaker 06: strengthen that collaborative relationship between Grey
02:32:52 Speaker 06: and our member municipalities, to clarify
02:32:54 Speaker 06: roles and responsibilities, which will help
02:32:56 Speaker 06: us improve continuity as well during
02:32:57 Speaker 06: staff transition. As well during staff
02:32:59 Speaker 06: transitions, by having a standardized and
02:33:01 Speaker 06: transferable framework, there's always lots of
02:33:03 Speaker 06: movement on the ground with staffing
02:33:05 Speaker 06: locally at the county. Everywhere we
02:33:07 Speaker 06: look, there's movement. So having something
02:33:09 Speaker 06: that people can pick up and
02:33:11 Speaker 06: understand, this is what applies to
02:33:14 Speaker 06: us. This is my role in
02:33:15 Speaker 06: this work specifically, would be really
02:33:17 Speaker 06: beneficial. The accompanying annual work plans
02:33:18 Speaker 06: then serve as a mechanism for
02:33:20 Speaker 06: proposing and evaluating or implementing those
02:33:22 Speaker 06: projects that are tailored to individual
02:33:24 Speaker 06: municipalities. It allows us to avoid
02:33:26 Speaker 06: duplication of effort, optimize the resource.
02:33:26 Speaker 06: Optimize the resources that we have,
02:33:28 Speaker 06: and begin to really, truly operationalize
02:33:31 Speaker 06: the discussions and the opportunities that
02:33:32 Speaker 06: are being commuted through our Economic
02:33:33 Speaker 06: Development Leadership Series. And why now?
02:33:35 Speaker 06: Not two years ago, when we
02:33:37 Speaker 06: approved the EDTC Master Plan, we
02:33:39 Speaker 06: weren't ready. We to do a
02:33:41 Speaker 06: lot of foundational work to get
02:33:43 Speaker 06: us to this point of actually
02:33:45 Speaker 06: having something that we could commit
02:33:46 Speaker 06: to you, you could commit to
02:33:47 Speaker 06: us, and vice versa. So there
02:33:52 Speaker 06: was a lot of foundational research
02:33:53 Speaker 06: and preparatory work that was essential
02:33:55 Speaker 06: in those first two years. to
02:33:56 Speaker 06: get us to this point of
02:33:58 Speaker 06: having something to be able to
02:33:59 Speaker 06: put on paper. So during that
02:34:01 Speaker 06: time, we have positioned our teams
02:34:04 Speaker 06: for success locally and at
02:34:05 Speaker 06: the county. We've introduced relevant tools,
02:34:07 Speaker 06: templates. We've got shared platforms now.
02:34:09 Speaker 06: Well, we've also deepened our
02:34:11 Speaker 06: understanding about the opportunities and the
02:34:13 Speaker 06: processes, perspectives that we need to
02:34:15 Speaker 06: be able to advance right across
02:34:16 Speaker 06: gray. So now, with that shared
02:34:19 Speaker 06: understanding and that access to the
02:34:20 Speaker 06: common tools, the time seems right
02:34:22 Speaker 06: to formalize the collaboration and to
02:34:24 Speaker 06: also seek commitment from all parties
02:34:26 Speaker 06: to collect. Commitment from all parties
02:34:28 Speaker 06: to collectively adopt and leverage those
02:34:30 Speaker 06: tools that we have developed and
02:34:31 Speaker 06: acquired, because we don't want to
02:34:34 Speaker 06: be investing in resources if they're
02:34:36 Speaker 06: just going to sit there. That
02:34:37 Speaker 06: is not the intent. So this
02:34:38 Speaker 06: enables us to commit to those
02:34:40 Speaker 06: uses. And it has been a
02:34:41 Speaker 06: minute to get here. So there's
02:34:44 Speaker 06: been a lot of rounds of
02:34:45 Speaker 06: engagement to this point, and I
02:34:46 Speaker 06: just wanted to put it all
02:34:49 Speaker 06: together on the slide for you,
02:34:50 Speaker 06: so that you could see, as
02:34:52 Speaker 06: I mentioned, the idea of having
02:34:54 Speaker 06: a team great MOU that came
02:34:55 Speaker 06: from the development of our master
02:34:56 Speaker 06: plan, which we did with all
02:34:58 Speaker 06: of our member municipalities. over the
02:35:02 Speaker 06: course of eight months in 2023,
02:35:04 Speaker 06: we then drafted the MOU following
02:35:05 Speaker 06: three rounds of engagement with economic
02:35:08 Speaker 06: development staff and every one of
02:35:10 Speaker 06: your CIOs. Through 2024, we talked
02:35:11 Speaker 06: to the economic development working group
02:35:12 Speaker 06: every quarter. In May 2025, I
02:35:13 Speaker 06: attended the local CIO meeting where
02:35:15 Speaker 06: we talked with all CIOs together,
02:35:18 Speaker 06: and then I had a one-on-one
02:35:19 Speaker 06: meeting with each of your CIOs
02:35:22 Speaker 06: independently to get their advice for
02:35:25 Speaker 06: what would end up in this
02:35:27 Speaker 06: draft. Once we had a draft,
02:35:29 Speaker 06: we then went back to the
02:35:31 Speaker 06: C. We then went back to
02:35:34 Speaker 06: the CAOs. We went back to
02:35:36 Speaker 06: the EDO working group in November,
02:35:38 Speaker 06: and now the final that you
02:35:40 Speaker 06: see in front of you today—the
02:35:43 Speaker 06: work plan template, the council report,
02:35:44 Speaker 06: and the draft MOU—was circulated again
02:35:45 Speaker 06: in December to all CAOs and
02:35:47 Speaker 06: EDOS through the local meeting, and
02:35:48 Speaker 06: then as well through email. And
02:35:50 Speaker 06: the changes right up until a
02:35:51 Speaker 06: week and a half ago are
02:35:53 Speaker 06: what you see here in front
02:35:54 Speaker 06: of you today for your consideration.
02:35:55 Speaker 06: So, looking at the Team Gray
02:35:57 Speaker 06: MOU itself, I will not go
02:36:00 Speaker 06: through here. in detail because you've
02:36:02 Speaker 06: had it, you've read it. But
02:36:04 Speaker 06: the purpose really is to set
02:36:06 Speaker 06: out that framework for collaboration between
02:36:07 Speaker 06: Gray and our nine member municipalities,
02:36:11 Speaker 06: specifically around economic development and investment
02:36:13 Speaker 06: readiness, where we signal our mutual
02:36:15 Speaker 06: commitment, streamline cooperation, and create a
02:36:17 Speaker 06: clearer, more attractive environment for investors,
02:36:18 Speaker 06: whether they're local investors who are
02:36:20 Speaker 06: looking to expand, to maintain their
02:36:22 Speaker 06: business, or who want to come
02:36:23 Speaker 06: to this region. The guiding document
02:36:26 Speaker 06: is the master plan, which is
02:36:29 Speaker 06: developed in concert with all of
02:36:31 Speaker 06: our municipalities and the. scope is
02:36:32 Speaker 06: only priority one and two. We
02:36:35 Speaker 06: have guiding principles throughout the document
02:36:37 Speaker 06: that talk about that mutual respect
02:36:38 Speaker 06: and trust, being able to work
02:36:39 Speaker 06: together in good faith, knowing that
02:36:41 Speaker 06: there's a common understanding of those
02:36:42 Speaker 06: desired outcomes at the end of
02:36:43 Speaker 06: the day. So we're not coming
02:36:46 Speaker 06: in with different expectations of what
02:36:48 Speaker 06: it is that we're expecting to
02:36:51 Speaker 06: do, and having the transparency and
02:36:53 Speaker 06: accountability, knowing that we're going to
02:36:55 Speaker 06: be open and clear in our
02:36:58 Speaker 06: communication, but also know that we
02:36:59 Speaker 06: can trust that we're maintaining confidentiality
02:37:00 Speaker 06: when we need to. Some When
02:37:01 Speaker 06: we need to, sometimes it comes
02:37:03 Speaker 06: from the ground that we know
02:37:05 Speaker 06: we cannot say a word,
02:37:08 Speaker 06: and sometimes it comes from the
02:37:10 Speaker 06: county. But having that agreed to,
02:37:13 Speaker 06: collaboration and coordination, looking at activities
02:37:15 Speaker 06: and decisions that reflect the mutual
02:37:16 Speaker 06: commitment of benefit right across gray,
02:37:17 Speaker 06: and really the evidence-based decision making
02:37:19 Speaker 06: has been key. That is something
02:37:21 Speaker 06: that comes up over and over
02:37:21 Speaker 06: again, which is what you have
02:37:23 Speaker 06: seen through those shared tools, templates,
02:37:23 Speaker 06: and the data sharing platform that
02:37:25 Speaker 06: we now have together. I won't
02:37:26 Speaker 06: spend any time going through the
02:37:28 Speaker 06: rationale, but. looking specifically at the
02:37:29 Speaker 06: rules. So, Grey County, we are
02:37:31 Speaker 06: specifically looking to position the region
02:37:34 Speaker 06: for long-term growth and sustainability. Looking
02:37:36 Speaker 06: at systems mapping as Grey County
02:37:39 Speaker 06: as a whole, but paying really
02:37:40 Speaker 06: close attention to local, provincial, national,
02:37:42 Speaker 06: and global trends. And then we're
02:37:43 Speaker 06: proposing relevant projects to our municipal
02:37:45 Speaker 06: partners for consideration. So this isn't
02:37:48 Speaker 06: coming to you to say we
02:37:50 Speaker 06: need you to do X, Y,
02:37:52 Speaker 06: and Z. It is we see
02:37:55 Speaker 06: this as an opportunity. What do
02:37:58 Speaker 06: you think? Do you want to
02:38:00 Speaker 06: look at it? Do you want
02:38:02 Speaker 06: to pause? Do you want to
02:38:03 Speaker 06: just not think about it at
02:38:05 Speaker 06: all? Because we're just not there.
02:38:07 Speaker 06: That's that role. Then continuing our
02:38:09 Speaker 06: role to develop the tools and
02:38:11 Speaker 06: templates, including the shared data platform
02:38:13 Speaker 06: used by municipalities and partners, we
02:38:13 Speaker 06: will lead the regional data collection
02:38:16 Speaker 06: and analysis, but also support local
02:38:18 Speaker 06: data analysis. Leading investment attraction being
02:38:20 Speaker 06: the first point of contact with
02:38:24 Speaker 06: Invest Ontario, so that we can
02:38:25 Speaker 06: facilitate the site selectors and maintain
02:38:27 Speaker 06: an inventory. of marketable investment-ready sites.
02:38:29 Speaker 06: We will do that with you,
02:38:32 Speaker 06: but it's one point of contact
02:38:34 Speaker 06: with the province to start. Leading
02:38:36 Speaker 06: investment attraction marketing, including website and
02:38:38 Speaker 06: brand, bringing all of our municipalities
02:38:40 Speaker 06: together every quarter, just as we
02:38:42 Speaker 06: do with our economic development
02:38:45 Speaker 06: roundtables. But we're also going to
02:38:47 Speaker 06: start professional development and training opportunities.
02:38:48 Speaker 06: We introduced it this year. We've
02:38:49 Speaker 06: seen a lot of success with
02:38:51 Speaker 06: that, and we want to continue
02:38:52 Speaker 06: so that we're all getting the
02:38:54 Speaker 06: same training as we go. The
02:38:56 Speaker 06: role of our member municipalities. is
02:38:59 Speaker 06: to determine the local vision, clear
02:39:00 Speaker 06: determination of go/no go investments, and
02:39:03 Speaker 06: any preferred location for employment
02:39:06 Speaker 06: lands. So again, this is your
02:39:08 Speaker 06: role. This is what we are
02:39:10 Speaker 06: asking you to do, so that
02:39:12 Speaker 06: we are not deciding for you
02:39:13 Speaker 06: or telling you what to do.
02:39:14 Speaker 06: You're telling us what to do
02:39:16 Speaker 06: and what you want. Leading community
02:39:17 Speaker 06: economic development efforts, including determination of
02:39:18 Speaker 06: your individual and local priorities, all
02:39:20 Speaker 06: business retention and expansion activities, such
02:39:22 Speaker 06: as building relationships. and knowledge with
02:39:24 Speaker 06: businesses and landowners who are on
02:39:25 Speaker 06: the ground, and sharing relevant data
02:39:27 Speaker 06: with the county. We're not staffed
02:39:28 Speaker 06: to be able to do that
02:39:30 Speaker 06: work. As much as I would
02:39:33 Speaker 06: love to have staff on the
02:39:35 Speaker 06: ground in every one of your
02:39:36 Speaker 06: communities every day, I just can't
02:39:37 Speaker 06: do that with the resources that
02:39:39 Speaker 06: we have here. So that's something
02:39:42 Speaker 06: that we look to our municipalities
02:39:45 Speaker 06: to be building those relationships and
02:39:46 Speaker 06: sharing the information back, identifying highest
02:39:48 Speaker 06: and best value of land and
02:39:49 Speaker 06: building inventory, rezoning, servicing any of
02:39:52 Speaker 06: that into a shared template that
02:39:52 Speaker 06: we will develop as the county,
02:39:54 Speaker 06: and then to designate a point
02:39:56 Speaker 06: person for economic development coordination, and
02:39:57 Speaker 06: our shared commitment to one another
02:40:00 Speaker 06: is that we're prioritizing strategic, long-term
02:40:01 Speaker 06: thinking everywhere we can, pursuing joint
02:40:03 Speaker 06: initiatives where we can to support
02:40:04 Speaker 06: investment readiness, developing our economic development,
02:40:06 Speaker 06: tourism, and culture master plan every
02:40:08 Speaker 06: five years together. So we've already
02:40:09 Speaker 06: done that once together, continuing that
02:40:11 Speaker 06: so that all of our voices
02:40:13 Speaker 06: are on those documents right up
02:40:14 Speaker 06: to the very end. Our municipality
02:40:16 Speaker 06: strategies as well, because we can.
02:40:18 Speaker 06: Strategies as well, because we don't
02:40:20 Speaker 06: want conflict. They need to be
02:40:21 Speaker 06: able to speak to one another,
02:40:23 Speaker 06: consistently using those shared data platforms,
02:40:25 Speaker 06: tools, and resources that we've developed.
02:40:26 Speaker 06: Participating in our leadership series, valuing
02:40:27 Speaker 06: and respecting valuing the relationships that
02:40:29 Speaker 06: each party has built, because we
02:40:31 Speaker 06: know that takes time and effort,
02:40:32 Speaker 06: and ensuring consistency in messaging. Being
02:40:34 Speaker 06: a champion for ourselves and our
02:40:35 Speaker 06: neighbors, and then collaborating on funding
02:40:36 Speaker 06: applications where possible, and working towards
02:40:38 Speaker 06: consistency across planning and development policies,
02:40:39 Speaker 06: templates, and support. Policies, templates, and
02:40:40 Speaker 06: supports, and sharing our success, whether
02:40:42 Speaker 06: it's through acknowledgments or shared platforms.
02:40:46 Speaker 06: The project-specific work plans we already
02:40:48 Speaker 06: spoke about, and they're attached here
02:40:52 Speaker 06: at the end, and I'll just
02:40:54 Speaker 06: flip to that in a moment.
02:40:55 Speaker 06: But in terms of decision making
02:40:58 Speaker 29: in government, that our governance—the very
02:41:00 Speaker 29: first point—each party will always maintain
02:41:01 Speaker 29: their autonomy and the authority to
02:41:02 Speaker 29: improve any and all investment-ready projects
02:41:04 Speaker 29: lives with the member municipality. In
02:41:06 Speaker 29: terms of financial arrangements, staff resources
02:41:08 Speaker 29: they'll be assigned by each party
02:41:09 Speaker 29: through annual. work plan and allocation,
02:41:11 Speaker 29: just as they already are. Any
02:41:13 Speaker 29: joint initiatives that we can cost
02:41:15 Speaker 29: share on a project by project
02:41:16 Speaker 29: basis, we definitely want to look
02:41:19 Speaker 29: at. The example in here is
02:41:21 Speaker 29: Environics and the shared data that
02:41:25 Speaker 29: we have. But knowing that every
02:41:29 Speaker 29: party is responsible for its own
02:41:32 Speaker 29: costs, unless otherwise agreed, and all
02:41:34 Speaker 29: of those at any point will
02:41:36 Speaker 29: always come through our budget cycles
02:41:37 Speaker 56: and through council direction. So there
02:41:40 Speaker 56: should be no surprises along the
02:41:42 Speaker 56: way. It's recommended that the timelines
02:41:44 Speaker 56: and the term goes along with
02:41:45 Speaker 56: the master plan. So in this
02:41:47 Speaker 56: case, it would end. December thirty
02:41:49 Speaker 56: first of twenty twenty eight, and
02:41:51 Speaker 56: then every five years after, we
02:41:55 Speaker 56: will review with your municipalities every
02:41:57 Speaker 56: single year to make sure that
02:41:59 Speaker 56: this is still a relevant document.
02:42:00 Speaker 56: If there's updates needed, we will
02:42:03 Speaker 56: come back to council with that
02:42:04 Speaker 56: direction. And at the end of
02:42:05 Speaker 56: the day, it's non-binding. It's an
02:42:10 Speaker 56: agreement to work together and to
02:42:13 Speaker 56: collaborate in what we're already doing,
02:42:15 Speaker 56: but now it's on paper. And
02:42:17 Speaker 56: then the very last is that
02:42:21 Speaker 56: work plan, as I mentioned. So
02:42:24 Speaker 56: this is where we can propose
02:42:25 Speaker 56: projects back and forth. that are
02:42:27 Speaker 57: very specific in nature determine if
02:42:29 Speaker 57: these are confidential projects that we
02:42:31 Speaker 57: just cannot talk about publicly, or
02:42:34 Speaker 57: if they're not. And then, who's
02:42:35 Speaker 57: doing what? What is the role?
02:42:37 Speaker 57: What's the timeline expectation? And at
02:42:40 Speaker 57: any point, if we start something,
02:42:42 Speaker 57: any deposit, we can do so,
02:42:45 Speaker 57: or we can go right through
02:42:47 Speaker 57: the end. So that is the
02:42:49 Speaker 57: a lot of information to
02:42:52 Speaker 57: give to you. It's been a
02:42:53 Speaker 57: lot of work, and I really
02:42:56 Speaker 57: do want to thank all of
02:42:57 Speaker 57: your CIOs and your economic development
02:43:00 Speaker 57: staff. As you have seen, we've
02:43:01 Speaker 57: been talking about this since 2023,
02:43:03 Speaker 57: and we've. done a lot of
02:43:06 Speaker 57: work on it since May of
02:43:09 Speaker 57: this year. And I really appreciate,
02:43:11 Speaker 57: and it's exciting to see that
02:43:13 Speaker 57: as staff, we're all on the
02:43:14 Speaker 57: same page, and hoping that we
02:43:16 Speaker 57: can work together with you as
02:43:20 Speaker 57: well. Thank you, Director Myers, and
02:43:21 Speaker 57: just like the previous topic, one
02:43:23 Speaker 57: one report can't fully illustrate the
02:43:24 Speaker 57: kind of hours that went into
02:43:26 Speaker 57: all the work with staff bringing
02:43:28 Speaker 06: it to this fruition, like this,
02:43:29 Speaker 06: and and the way in which
02:43:31 Speaker 06: you work with each and every
02:43:34 Speaker 06: one of the nine municipalities. Every
02:43:35 Speaker 06: one of the nine municipality staff
02:43:37 Speaker 06: and their representation as well, both
02:43:38 Speaker 06: the CAOs and the economic development
02:43:39 Speaker 06: officers. So it truly is something
02:43:41 Speaker 06: that is made in gray, as
02:43:43 Speaker 06: you said, and both the memorandum
02:43:44 Speaker 06: of understanding, but also the work
02:43:46 Speaker 06: plan, and how unique and creative
02:43:47 Speaker 06: that will be for each and
02:43:48 Speaker 06: every municipality. So, with that, we
02:43:49 Speaker 06: have a question from the deputy
02:43:50 Speaker 06: warden. Thank you, Madam Warden, and
02:43:52 Speaker 06: we are stronger together. And this
02:43:53 Speaker 06: really. emphasizes that. And I thank
02:43:56 Speaker 06: you, Savannah, for your passion for
02:43:58 Speaker 06: this project. I think the only
02:44:00 Speaker 06: one that could provide it any
02:44:01 Speaker 06: faster, any better, would be Roger.
02:44:08 Speaker 06: Although half of us, you know,
02:44:10 Speaker 06: it would go over the top
02:44:11 Speaker 06: of most of us at speed
02:44:14 Speaker 06: he goes. But thank you so
02:44:16 Speaker 20: much for this. It really is.
02:44:17 Speaker 20: I know my EDO or our
02:44:19 Speaker 20: EDO really appreciates the relationship she
02:44:20 Speaker 20: has with you and your staff.
02:44:22 Speaker 20: And I think this is a.
02:44:23 Speaker 20: really good step forward, and we'll
02:44:26 Speaker 20: so we'll see a lot of
02:44:27 Speaker 20: good come out of it. So
02:46:43 Speaker 20: again, thank you very much. Okay,
03:00:01 Speaker 20: thank you. We'll go to Councillor
03:09:03 Speaker 20: Kibany. Thank you, Warden Matrasovs, and
03:14:45 Speaker 20: I just wanted to extend my
03:18:29 Speaker 20: congratulations to Savannah. This is really,
03:19:01 Speaker 20: really exciting work, and recognizing that
03:23:55 Speaker 20: when we first Councillor Body and
03:23:57 Speaker 20: I talked about the Shared Services
03:23:59 Speaker 20: Committee, and Councillor Body brought forward
03:24:00 Speaker 20: that motion. It was one of
03:24:03 Speaker 20: the original thoughts was economic development
03:24:05 Speaker 01: and how could we more closely
03:24:08 Speaker 01: work together? And here, Savannah's was
03:24:10 Speaker 58: way way ahead of us and
03:24:11 Speaker 01: already had this this work underway.
03:24:18 Speaker 29: And I think of our own
03:24:19 Speaker 29: Gray County PDAC committee and and
03:24:23 Speaker 29: the support that will be provided
03:24:25 Speaker 29: from that, but also from our
03:24:27 Speaker 29: own economic development advisory committees within
03:24:28 Speaker 29: their own municipalities. I think this
03:24:30 Speaker 29: you've spoken to so many points
03:24:34 Speaker 29: that come. up in our own
03:24:35 Speaker 29: conversations at those committee levels, and
03:24:37 Speaker 29: I'm thinking about how pleased those
03:24:39 Speaker 29: individuals will be, and and how
03:24:41 Speaker 29: they can can contribute to the
03:24:42 Speaker 29: collective effort of the of the
03:24:46 Speaker 29: shared goals going forward, Savannah. So
03:24:47 Speaker 29: I just thought I might ask
03:24:58 Speaker 29: you to comment on that about
03:25:00 Speaker 29: how our own local advisory committees
03:25:01 Speaker 29: can support what you're doing. Thank
03:25:03 Speaker 29: you, and through you, Warden, that
03:25:06 Speaker 29: is a great question. And as
03:25:08 Speaker 29: you know from this recommendation, this
03:25:10 Speaker 29: will be coming. to your local
03:25:11 Speaker 29: councils, and I think it would
03:25:12 Speaker 29: be a great opportunity to have
03:25:16 Speaker 59: a conversation with your committee, and
03:25:17 Speaker 59: then aligning the work plans that
03:25:18 Speaker 59: we have and the priorities and
03:25:20 Speaker 59: the timelines. And that may be
03:25:22 Speaker 59: the committee that we want to
03:25:25 Speaker 59: work together to figure out what
03:25:27 Speaker 59: are these project-specific work plans looking
03:25:29 Speaker 59: like to see what roles there
03:25:31 Speaker 59: may be. So I think having
03:25:34 Speaker 59: that conversation at the committee as
03:25:39 Speaker 59: well as council would be excellent,
03:25:42 Speaker 59: and we are happy to come
03:25:44 Speaker 59: then to your committee a couple
03:25:46 Speaker 59: of times, and then it's
03:25:49 Speaker 59: always a treat to be
03:25:52 Speaker 59: able to have the conversation and
03:25:55 Speaker 59: really. understand that local perspective, but
03:25:56 Speaker 59: getting to dive in and have
03:25:58 Speaker 59: everybody from your committees locally recommend
03:26:02 Speaker 59: to your councils locally as well
03:26:04 Speaker 59: would be wonderful. Okay, see nothing
03:26:06 Speaker 59: online, nothing here left in the
03:26:08 Speaker 59: chamber. I'll call the question. Then
03:26:10 Speaker 59: all those in favor. That motion
03:26:11 Speaker 59: is carried. Okay, so thank you
03:26:17 Speaker 59: very much for that. So we
03:26:18 Speaker 59: are going to take a break
03:26:20 Speaker 59: to lunch now, Madam Clerk. If
03:26:22 Speaker 59: we come back at quarter after
03:26:24 Speaker 59: one, would that be? suitable? Quarter
03:26:26 Speaker 59: after one, we will reconvene and
03:26:30 Speaker 59: conclude with the items that are
03:26:33 Speaker 59: left on the agenda. Thank you.
03:26:37 Speaker 59: Okay. It is cool. It is
03:26:40 Speaker 59: cool. Yes. Yes. Okay. welcome back,
03:26:42 Speaker 59: committee. The whole members we are
03:26:44 Speaker 59: present. We have around our table,
03:26:47 Speaker 59: and we have people logging back
03:26:49 Speaker 59: on virtually as well. And we
03:26:52 Speaker 59: have two items remaining that will
03:26:55 Speaker 59: require some discussion. So the first
03:26:57 Speaker 59: one is we're going to go
03:26:59 Speaker 59: back to item seven C. Back
03:27:02 Speaker 59: to item 7C, and it is
03:27:04 Speaker 59: recommended that report PDR CW 7125
03:27:06 Speaker 59: regarding a status update on the
03:27:08 Speaker 59: county's growth management strategy be received
03:27:11 Speaker 59: for information, and that the final
03:27:12 Speaker 59: draft of the growth management strategy
03:27:15 Speaker 59: be prepared early in 2026 for
03:27:16 Speaker 59: council's consideration. And with that, I
03:27:18 Speaker 59: would like to ask for a
03:27:19 Speaker 59: mover and a seconder. Okay, we've
03:27:23 Speaker 59: got a move by the deputy
03:27:26 Speaker 59: Morden, seconded by Councillor Kevany. It's
03:27:28 Speaker 59: now on the floor for discussion,
03:27:29 Speaker 59: and welcome. Senior Policy Planner Bockton.
03:27:31 Speaker 59: You're going to be starting us
03:27:33 Speaker 59: off. Okay, excellent. Welcome. Wonderful. Well,
03:27:35 Speaker 59: thank you very much. Really glad
03:27:37 Speaker 59: to be here to have a
03:27:40 Speaker 59: conversation regarding our growth management plan
03:27:42 Speaker 59: update. So it's it's a hefty
03:27:44 Speaker 59: slide deck. We'll try to move
03:27:46 Speaker 59: through that fairly quickly. I am
03:27:48 Speaker 59: aware that this was included in
03:27:51 Speaker 59: the package as well with the
03:27:53 Speaker 59: report. so certainly we we can
03:27:56 Speaker 59: have further discussion after as well.
03:27:59 Speaker 59: If you've had a chance to
03:28:01 Speaker 59: look over, I will further note
03:28:03 Speaker 59: that we will have Patrick Barbieri
03:28:06 Speaker 59: from Hemerson online as well. So,
03:28:08 Speaker 59: should we get to those questions
03:28:10 Speaker 59: and need to call a friend
03:28:12 Speaker 59: for some some assistance, that that
03:28:14 Speaker 59: will be an option as well.
03:28:17 Speaker 59: So, we'll just dive right in.
03:28:19 Speaker 59: Okay, so focus today. We'll do
03:28:20 Speaker 59: a bit of a recap on
03:28:22 Speaker 59: the countywide forecasting. This was shared
03:28:25 Speaker 59: through the Economic Development Planning and
03:28:28 Speaker 59: Economic Development Committee earlier. Those countywide
03:28:29 Speaker 59: forecasts in draft. So we'll do
03:28:31 Speaker 59: that recap. We'll look a little
03:28:33 Speaker 59: bit at the local forecasts to
03:28:35 Speaker 59: 2051 for population, households, and housing,
03:28:36 Speaker 59: and employment. We'll look a bit
03:28:38 Speaker 59: at that employment and residential land
03:28:40 Speaker 59: need piece. An assessment is part
03:28:42 Speaker 59: of the process, and then we'll
03:28:46 Speaker 59: talk a bit about those next
03:28:47 Speaker 59: steps that would arise from the
03:28:51 Speaker 59: process. Okay, so for this slide
03:28:52 Speaker 59: here, I just want to orient
03:28:53 Speaker 59: everybody to what we're looking at.
03:28:56 Speaker 59: So in the green bars, we're
03:28:58 Speaker 59: looking at the total county population
03:28:59 Speaker 59: over time. The x-axis here is
03:29:01 Speaker 59: is years, so looking backwards at
03:29:03 Speaker 59: the last forecast period, and then
03:29:04 Speaker 59: ahead to the future as well.
03:29:07 Speaker 59: in the white, so we've got
03:29:09 Speaker 59: a line in the the left
03:29:11 Speaker 59: hand side there, that represents the
03:29:14 Speaker 59: average annual growth over that historic
03:29:16 Speaker 59: period. Whereas the red line identifies
03:29:19 Speaker 59: the average forecasted growth over the
03:29:21 Speaker 59: coming horizon, and the gold line,
03:29:22 Speaker 59: which is doing a lot there,
03:29:23 Speaker 59: that one actually represents the growth
03:29:33 Speaker 59: of the population within each of
03:29:34 Speaker 59: those years. So as opposed to
03:29:39 Speaker 59: the total. So looking at that
03:29:40 Speaker 59: gold line. there has certainly been
03:29:41 Speaker 59: a lot of rapid growth ahead
03:29:45 Speaker 59: of, through, and coming out of
03:29:47 Speaker 59: the pandemic. This is a pattern
03:29:49 Speaker 59: actually that has been seen across
03:29:52 Speaker 59: the province, and it represents the
03:29:56 Speaker 59: highest growth in Grey County for
03:29:59 Speaker 59: decades prior. This was largely driven
03:30:02 Speaker 59: by non-permanent residents and immigration, with
03:30:04 Speaker 59: spillover from larger centres to areas
03:30:06 Speaker 59: like ours here in Grey. And
03:30:08 Speaker 59: growth has been accelerated in some
03:30:10 Speaker 59: areas, not just due to growth
03:30:13 Speaker 59: in terms of home for. workers,
03:30:15 Speaker 59: but also seasonal tourism, retirement, and
03:30:18 Speaker 59: remote work opportunities too. As we
03:30:20 Speaker 59: saw emerging through the pandemic, parts
03:30:23 Speaker 59: of Gray are also part of
03:30:24 Speaker 59: the catchment area for longer commutes
03:30:26 Speaker 59: to the larger city centers for
03:30:28 Speaker 59: affordable pricing. So we're within kind
03:30:30 Speaker 59: of that distance for drive to
03:30:34 Speaker 59: qualify. Kind of approaches, but what
03:30:35 Speaker 59: our consultants are advising us is
03:30:38 Speaker 59: that that period of very high
03:30:38 Speaker 59: growth is over for for the.
03:30:39 Speaker 59: time being, immigration has been reduced.
03:30:42 Speaker 59: Temporary student caps have been placed.
03:30:43 Speaker 59: There is some economic uncertainty, of
03:30:45 Speaker 59: course, and so those key ingredients
03:30:48 Speaker 59: for that very high sustained growth
03:30:49 Speaker 59: aren't aren't quite there as they
03:30:51 Speaker 59: were in the past. And so
03:30:54 Speaker 59: that has been considered as we
03:30:57 Speaker 59: look ahead to those future expectations.
03:30:59 Speaker 59: What we expect this will mean
03:30:59 Speaker 59: is a little slower growth than
03:31:02 Speaker 59: the most recent peaks in the
03:31:04 Speaker 59: coming years, and we have
03:31:06 Speaker 59: seen kind of a roll. back
03:31:08 Speaker 59: with the Ministry of Finance projections
03:31:09 Speaker 59: as well over as they've been
03:31:13 Speaker 59: issued over the past eighteen months
03:31:14 Speaker 59: and more recently this past year,
03:31:16 Speaker 59: which indicates that they're understanding that
03:31:19 Speaker 59: slow back as well. So the
03:31:21 Speaker 59: growth ahead is higher than we've
03:31:23 Speaker 59: experienced in a sustained way. So
03:31:26 Speaker 59: the average you can see there,
03:31:29 Speaker 59: the red line is is higher
03:31:30 Speaker 59: than that historic period on average.
03:31:32 Speaker 59: But we do anticipate, and I'll
03:31:34 Speaker 59: just bring your attention to the
03:31:36 Speaker 59: far right of that graph, where
03:31:41 Speaker 59: we see kind of that growth
03:31:44 Speaker 59: declining a little bit towards the
03:31:46 Speaker 59: end of the period, with respect
03:31:48 Speaker 59: to the boomer cohort. So in
03:31:50 Speaker 59: twenty fifty one, the baby boomers
03:31:53 Speaker 59: as a cohort hit life expectancy,
03:31:55 Speaker 59: and so the expectation is
03:31:58 Speaker 59: that the the death rate or
03:32:00 Speaker 59: or I guess population decline attributed
03:32:02 Speaker 59: to that would act as a
03:32:05 Speaker 59: bit of a drag on growth
03:32:07 Speaker 59: in the latter period of this
03:32:09 Speaker 59: growth horizons. Okay, easy for me
03:32:11 Speaker 59: to say, right? Yeah. Okay. So
03:32:13 Speaker 59: I think we wanted to talk
03:32:17 Speaker 59: a little bit and offer a
03:32:20 Speaker 59: recap as well around employment. So
03:32:22 Speaker 59: here we are seeing an expectation
03:32:25 Speaker 59: through the growth management plan 2025
03:32:28 Speaker 59: for a higher degree of employment
03:32:29 Speaker 59: growth over this period versus what
03:32:31 Speaker 59: was anticipated through the 2021 growth
03:32:33 Speaker 59: management exercise. The assumption is, of
03:32:36 Speaker 59: course, that certain types of employment
03:32:37 Speaker 59: are driven largely by the population
03:32:40 Speaker 59: increase. So as you grow, certain
03:32:42 Speaker 59: types of population, like retail and
03:32:43 Speaker 59: service and institutional needs, grow as
03:32:45 Speaker 59: well. But we have here also
03:32:46 Speaker 59: assumed additional employment land employment in
03:32:49 Speaker 59: the future, and that reflects the
03:32:50 Speaker 59: need for economic diversification as we
03:32:52 Speaker 59: grow, but also the initiatives that
03:32:53 Speaker 59: are being led by the county
03:32:54 Speaker 59: and member municipalities. The municipalities, and
03:32:57 Speaker 59: Helena had spoken to you a
03:33:00 Speaker 59: little bit this morning as well.
03:33:02 Speaker 59: Really looking at trying to do
03:33:04 Speaker 59: a big job, a good job
03:33:06 Speaker 59: with those employment lands. And what
03:33:07 Speaker 59: I would say, you know, I
03:33:09 Speaker 59: think we are seeing some of
03:33:10 Speaker 59: that that work come online. So
03:33:12 Speaker 59: I know Oland, for example, is
03:33:17 Speaker 59: working through some policy revisions with
03:33:18 Speaker 59: their employment lands right now. And
03:33:20 Speaker 59: we've seen Mayfair take a big
03:33:20 Speaker 59: swing with some acquisition of employment
03:33:22 Speaker 59: lands. So certainly those types of
03:33:27 Speaker 59: actions will be supporting. Looking at
03:33:30 Speaker 59: the current data, we are well
03:33:32 Speaker 59: ahead of where we thought we
03:33:37 Speaker 59: might be in 2021 for employment
03:33:39 Speaker 59: growth. We have had fairly robust
03:33:42 Speaker 59: on residential sector development, already reflected
03:33:44 Speaker 59: in the recent current data too.
03:33:47 Speaker 59: And so, this growth forecast is
03:33:49 Speaker 59: considered to be ambitious but achievable.
03:33:52 Speaker 59: Okay, and there is quite a
03:33:55 Speaker 59: value to having a robust employment
03:33:56 Speaker 59: outlook for the county. The
03:34:00 Speaker 59: consultant had noted for us that
03:34:02 Speaker 59: the activity rate has been declining
03:34:05 Speaker 59: in each of the census periods.
03:34:08 Speaker 59: to participation in in that employment,
03:34:09 Speaker 59: and so the idea is, if
03:34:10 Speaker 59: we are growing that employment, perhaps
03:34:13 Speaker 59: we can work to stabilize
03:34:15 Speaker 59: that decline in participation rate or
03:34:17 Speaker 59: reverse with our efforts. Okay, so
03:34:18 Speaker 59: for this one here, again, just
03:34:21 Speaker 59: recap. So bottom x-axis, we have
03:34:29 Speaker 59: different periods of time, and then
03:34:30 Speaker 59: within each of those periods of
03:34:32 Speaker 59: time, we can see the various
03:34:34 Speaker 59: contributions to population growth, and so
03:34:37 Speaker 59: the red in those bars is
03:34:39 Speaker 59: representing interprovincial migration. So you can
03:34:41 Speaker 59: see certainly through the pandemic period
03:34:43 Speaker 59: that's a very big contribution to
03:34:44 Speaker 59: to that growth over that period
03:34:46 Speaker 59: of time. But it is expected
03:34:51 Speaker 59: that that will continue to be
03:34:55 Speaker 59: a large driver of growth that
03:34:56 Speaker 59: interprovincial migration to Grey County. It
03:34:58 Speaker 59: is tricky; those components represented by
03:35:01 Speaker 59: the red there are are complex.
03:35:03 Speaker 59: They're are are complex, because we're
03:35:04 Speaker 59: not just pulling from one city
03:35:08 Speaker 59: center or location. In that migration,
03:35:10 Speaker 59: we see growth from the GTA,
03:35:11 Speaker 59: as well as Kitchener and Waterloo,
03:35:15 Speaker 59: and then more regionally from rural
03:35:16 Speaker 59: areas to urban areas. And so
03:35:18 Speaker 59: we have tried to kind of
03:35:25 Speaker 59: capture that in the growth expectations
03:35:31 Speaker 59: and local allocations to reflect the
03:35:33 Speaker 59: fact that, based on how these
03:35:36 Speaker 59: factors show up in each community,
03:35:36 Speaker 59: the growth will be varied in
03:35:37 Speaker 59: each community as a result. The
03:35:40 Speaker 59: only other thing I would.
03:35:42 Speaker 59: say here is just with respect
03:35:44 Speaker 59: to the green component of the
03:35:47 Speaker 59: bars, and so you can see
03:35:49 Speaker 59: as we get later into that
03:35:51 Speaker 59: time period of this growth horizon,
03:35:54 Speaker 59: that natural decrease represented by green
03:35:57 Speaker 59: is increasing, and so that's what
03:36:00 Speaker 59: I mean when when we're talking
03:36:03 Speaker 59: about the way that that natural
03:36:05 Speaker 59: decline will be a drag on
03:36:07 Speaker 59: growth. We may still be seeing
03:36:08 Speaker 59: that same level of interregional growth,
03:36:10 Speaker 59: but we'll be offsetting those losses
03:36:13 Speaker 59: through attrition. Okay, so the component.
03:36:14 Speaker 59: Okay, so the components of growth
03:36:16 Speaker 59: are expected to shift somewhat over
03:36:24 Speaker 59: time. I think it's just the
03:36:26 Speaker 59: other point that I was asked
03:36:27 Speaker 59: to be sure to emphasize. Okay,
03:36:30 Speaker 59: so having recap the countywide forecast,
03:36:31 Speaker 59: we'll now move into the local
03:36:33 Speaker 59: municipal allocations element of the work.
03:36:37 Speaker 59: Okay, so this chart here compares
03:36:39 Speaker 59: the average annual population growth over
03:36:41 Speaker 59: the last twenty years, and that's
03:36:43 Speaker 59: reflected for each of the municipalities.
03:36:45 Speaker 59: The municipality up until 2021, and
03:36:48 Speaker 59: then the average annual population growth
03:36:52 Speaker 59: for the forecast period to 2051
03:36:55 Speaker 59: in gold. So you can see
03:36:57 Speaker 59: for each of the municipalities, every
03:36:59 Speaker 59: municipality is forecasted to continue growing.
03:37:02 Speaker 59: Each will grow faster than than
03:37:05 Speaker 59: the prior average population growth rate.
03:37:06 Speaker 59: Not all communities will grow at
03:37:08 Speaker 59: the same rate or in the
03:37:09 Speaker 59: same way, and some will see
03:37:11 Speaker 59: higher growth due to that interprovincial
03:37:17 Speaker 59: migration to. Interprovincial migration, together with
03:37:18 Speaker 59: their status as a regional center,
03:37:20 Speaker 59: and so that would come into
03:37:23 Speaker 59: play with respect to Owen Sound
03:37:25 Speaker 59: and Hanover. Okay, so this represents
03:37:28 Speaker 59: the allocations in terms of people
03:37:29 Speaker 59: population. So on the left of
03:37:30 Speaker 59: this screen, you can see each
03:37:33 Speaker 59: member municipality with the population growth
03:37:35 Speaker 59: that is forecasted for that municipality
03:37:37 Speaker 59: over this period of time
03:37:39 Speaker 59: to twenty fifty one, and then
03:37:41 Speaker 59: what. is represented is a share
03:37:43 Speaker 59: of county growth for each of
03:37:45 Speaker 59: those municipalities. This anticipates that the
03:37:47 Speaker 59: green would represent the 2021 census
03:37:49 Speaker 59: population, and the gold would represent
03:37:51 Speaker 59: the 2051 population if all of
03:37:54 Speaker 59: our our growth expectations come to
03:37:56 Speaker 59: fruition. And so the expectation here
03:37:57 Speaker 59: is that Blue Mountains and Oceanside
03:38:00 Speaker 59: would be the most populous municipalities
03:38:01 Speaker 59: by 2051, with a band of
03:38:02 Speaker 59: a number of municipalities kind of
03:38:05 Speaker 59: in the. thirteen to fifteen thousand
03:38:06 Speaker 59: population range, and then slightly lesser
03:38:08 Speaker 59: growth for Chatsworth, which will maintain
03:38:09 Speaker 59: largely status quo into the the
03:38:11 Speaker 59: horizon here. Okay, and so from
03:38:14 Speaker 59: those population allocations, we then go
03:38:16 Speaker 59: forward to translate those into households,
03:38:18 Speaker 59: and so laid out in the
03:38:20 Speaker 59: same way, we can see the
03:38:23 Speaker 59: chart on the left hand side
03:38:25 Speaker 59: that identifies by municipality. the anticipated
03:38:27 Speaker 59: household growth, the share of the
03:38:29 Speaker 59: household growth overall, and what I
03:38:32 Speaker 59: would say it's not always a
03:38:34 Speaker 59: direct translation. The same for each
03:38:36 Speaker 59: municipality between population and households. We
03:38:38 Speaker 59: do look at demographic age cohorts
03:38:40 Speaker 59: and headship rates to to make
03:38:43 Speaker 59: that transition into household allocations. And
03:38:45 Speaker 59: generally, the trend is the older
03:38:48 Speaker 59: the population, the higher the headship
03:38:50 Speaker 59: rate. And so we do see
03:38:51 Speaker 59: this, for example, in Orange. Sound,
03:38:53 Speaker 59: where you would see greater household
03:38:57 Speaker 59: growth for the same population due
03:38:58 Speaker 59: to the fact that there are
03:39:01 Speaker 59: more single-person households in that older
03:39:04 Speaker 59: age cohort. And then finally, for
03:39:06 Speaker 59: employment allocations, again on the left-hand
03:39:08 Speaker 59: side, we have the chart showing
03:39:11 Speaker 59: the employment growth anticipated. So this
03:39:12 Speaker 59: is in jobs, and the share
03:39:14 Speaker 59: of the overall county growth, like
03:39:15 Speaker 59: households. which largely mirror population forecasts,
03:39:16 Speaker 59: there will be some aspects of
03:39:18 Speaker 59: employment that mirror the population growth
03:39:20 Speaker 59: too. So those general community employment
03:39:22 Speaker 59: type of roles, service, retail, healthcare,
03:39:25 Speaker 59: local government, etc. But I think
03:39:27 Speaker 59: this also does include that employment
03:39:29 Speaker 59: growth, employment, and so the expectation
03:39:32 Speaker 59: is that those areas that do
03:39:34 Speaker 59: have a supply of employment lands
03:39:36 Speaker 59: could potentially accommodate an outsized share
03:39:37 Speaker 59: of employment based on the available.
03:39:39 Speaker 59: Based on the availability of land
03:39:42 Speaker 59: that is in those locations, and
03:39:43 Speaker 59: so I think Owen Sound and
03:39:45 Speaker 59: Hanover would both be represented in
03:39:47 Speaker 59: that group as well. Okay, so
03:39:50 Speaker 59: I just will have a little
03:39:53 Speaker 59: interlude here to talk about the
03:39:55 Speaker 59: projection methodology guidance that is in
03:39:58 Speaker 59: process. I guess for an update
03:40:00 Speaker 59: with the province, I have some
03:40:03 Speaker 59: notes from the consultant. I want
03:40:05 Speaker 59: to make sure to get this
03:40:10 Speaker 59: right. So I think here the
03:40:12 Speaker 59: province. has released and has been
03:40:15 Speaker 59: consulting on proposed updates to provincial
03:40:17 Speaker 59: projection methodologies and guidance materials, and
03:40:19 Speaker 59: these are to be referred to
03:40:22 Speaker 59: in preparing draft forecast evaluations. And
03:40:24 Speaker 59: we have done so; Hemson has
03:40:25 Speaker 59: done so. The guidance is still
03:40:28 Speaker 59: in a draft form by the
03:40:29 Speaker 59: province. The ERO comment period is
03:40:32 Speaker 59: now completed, but Hemson has submitted
03:40:35 Speaker 59: comments on those guidelines, so they
03:40:37 Speaker 59: are quite familiar with with what's
03:40:38 Speaker 59: proposed there. We don't know when
03:40:40 Speaker 59: those guidelines will be formalized, but
03:40:43 Speaker 59: we have adopted some. of the
03:40:45 Speaker 59: language within just to make sure
03:40:47 Speaker 59: that we're being consistent with the
03:40:49 Speaker 59: approach that is there. It's not
03:40:51 Speaker 59: actually all that different from the
03:40:53 Speaker 59: approach Huntsman has taken in past
03:40:54 Speaker 59: years; very similar. In addressing how
03:40:56 Speaker 59: growth is to be allocated, so
03:40:58 Speaker 59: taking it from that county level
03:41:01 Speaker 59: into those local allocations, the guidance
03:41:02 Speaker 59: provides a few kind of simple
03:41:05 Speaker 59: methods, and they give us two
03:41:07 Speaker 59: approaches that are shown here. So
03:41:09 Speaker 59: in that guidance, they identify a
03:41:12 Speaker 59: method A. which would be what
03:41:15 Speaker 59: an allocation would look like from
03:41:17 Speaker 59: the county population to a municipality,
03:41:18 Speaker 59: just based on the share of
03:41:20 Speaker 59: census population for the whole county.
03:41:23 Speaker 59: So, let's just say, make it
03:41:24 Speaker 59: with seven percent of the overall
03:41:26 Speaker 59: county population. We would look forward
03:41:27 Speaker 59: and look at our overall growth
03:41:29 Speaker 59: and distribute seven percent of that
03:41:32 Speaker 59: to method under that scenario. Method
03:41:33 Speaker 59: B looks at that based on
03:41:35 Speaker 59: the municipality's share of population growth.
03:41:37 Speaker 59: Share of population grow within the
03:41:39 Speaker 59: five-year, sorry, ten-year period prior for
03:41:41 Speaker 59: the county, and really we could
03:41:43 Speaker 59: narrow it on a five-year period,
03:41:45 Speaker 59: kind of defines that recent growth
03:41:47 Speaker 59: trajectory. So that's another way that
03:41:49 Speaker 59: we could look at doing that
03:41:57 Speaker 59: allocation would be just to look
03:42:01 Speaker 59: at, you know, we've grown by
03:42:04 Speaker 59: X amount of units, and we're
03:42:07 Speaker 59: going to divide that out based
03:42:09 Speaker 59: on that most recent growth trend
03:42:10 Speaker 59: that municipality. I think in discussion
03:42:12 Speaker 59: with the consultant, what we understand
03:42:14 Speaker 59: is that these proposed methods. are
03:42:16 Speaker 59: somewhat problematic on their own, because
03:42:18 Speaker 59: in no way do they account
03:42:21 Speaker 59: for how those trends might change,
03:42:22 Speaker 59: or if we have the land
03:42:24 Speaker 59: available to accommodate, or the servicing
03:42:28 Speaker 59: available to accommodate. Right, it really
03:42:30 Speaker 59: doesn't capture what's already in the
03:42:32 Speaker 59: pipeline. Those kind of things. And
03:42:34 Speaker 59: so, what I would note is
03:42:37 Speaker 59: that we have in the slides
03:42:40 Speaker 59: to come presented method A and
03:42:43 Speaker 59: B, but the guidance does provide
03:42:44 Speaker 59: us an opportunity to allocate. slightly
03:42:46 Speaker 59: outside of the method A and
03:42:48 Speaker 59: B ways, where we can provide
03:42:52 Speaker 59: justification and demonstrate why we have
03:42:54 Speaker 59: done so. Okay. The other thing,
03:42:57 Speaker 59: just regarding the guidance that we
03:42:58 Speaker 59: receive from the province, so through
03:43:00 Speaker 59: the provincial planning statement, we are
03:43:04 Speaker 59: required to use Ministry of Finance
03:43:06 Speaker 59: projections to inform our our forecasts.
03:43:07 Speaker 59: But we want to highlight, and
03:43:10 Speaker 59: the the guidance does as well,
03:43:13 Speaker 59: that projections and forecasts are slightly
03:43:15 Speaker 59: different animals. So a projection is
03:43:17 Speaker 59: really just a straight extrapolation of
03:43:19 Speaker 59: current trends forward in time, assuming
03:43:21 Speaker 59: all things equal. It's neutral and
03:43:22 Speaker 59: it doesn't consider how those changes
03:43:24 Speaker 59: might evolve over time or how
03:43:27 Speaker 59: our assumptions might change over time.
03:43:28 Speaker 59: Whereas a forecast is instead a
03:43:30 Speaker 59: best estimate to predict predict that
03:43:32 Speaker 59: future state, and that would build
03:43:34 Speaker 59: on those past trends, but would
03:43:37 Speaker 59: also consider impacts around the changing
03:43:39 Speaker 59: variables that we think we might
03:43:41 Speaker 59: see. that would contribute to that
03:43:42 Speaker 59: growth in the future. So we
03:43:44 Speaker 59: want to highlight that because I
03:43:46 Speaker 59: think certainly there was a lot
03:43:48 Speaker 59: of discussion around that using the
03:43:51 Speaker 59: MLF numbers and those projections. But
03:43:52 Speaker 59: I think it's important to note
03:43:53 Speaker 59: that that those are projections. That
03:43:55 Speaker 59: translation into a forecast isn't provided
03:44:00 Speaker 59: by the province. That that's something
03:44:01 Speaker 59: that we do. And I think
03:44:02 Speaker 59: the other piece there that I
03:44:05 Speaker 59: would just note for those other
03:44:07 Speaker 59: agencies. that are doing work with
03:44:09 Speaker 59: data for their own strategic planning,
03:44:10 Speaker 59: so hospital boards, school boards, that
03:44:11 Speaker 59: kind of thing, they are also
03:44:14 Speaker 59: using the Ministry of Finance projections.
03:44:15 Speaker 59: And so I think by us
03:44:17 Speaker 59: doing this work, we're able to
03:44:19 Speaker 59: supplement the information that will be
03:44:21 Speaker 59: available to them for those planning
03:44:27 Speaker 59: purposes. In that we are sharing
03:44:28 Speaker 59: this information, it breaks it down
03:44:29 Speaker 59: into that a local allocation, and
03:44:34 Speaker 59: then does kind of factor in
03:44:36 Speaker 59: our understanding of how those assumptions
03:44:37 Speaker 59: may change over time. Okay. So,
03:44:38 Speaker 59: residential land use assessment. So, we've
03:44:40 Speaker 59: we've looked at those anticipated local
03:44:41 Speaker 59: allocations. So, those forecasts for the
03:44:42 Speaker 59: member municipalities. The next part of
03:44:44 Speaker 59: the exercise is to look at:
03:44:46 Speaker 59: Do we have adequate land to
03:44:50 Speaker 20: accommodate that forecasted growth? And so,
03:44:52 Speaker 20: the way that we do that
03:44:54 Speaker 20: is by taking those household forecasts
03:44:56 Speaker 20: and translating them into a forecast.
03:45:00 Speaker 20: by housing type, and so we
03:45:02 Speaker 20: look at three different types of
03:45:08 Speaker 20: units for that exercise: single semis,
03:45:10 Speaker 20: rows, and apartments. And then we
03:45:16 Speaker 53: look at that unit growth and
03:45:18 Speaker 53: allocate that to different areas within
03:45:21 Speaker 53: each of those municipalities. So that
03:45:22 Speaker 53: would include an allocation to rural
03:45:24 Speaker 53: areas as rural growth, that is
03:45:25 Speaker 53: a lower component of the overall
03:45:27 Speaker 53: forecast for each of the municipalities,
03:45:29 Speaker 53: and that is largely based on.
03:45:32 Speaker 53: historic trends for how that urban-rural
03:45:35 Speaker 53: split happens in terms of choices
03:45:37 Speaker 53: by people. The intensification in urban
03:45:39 Speaker 53: settlement areas is the next piece
03:45:40 Speaker 53: that we look at and allocate
03:45:41 Speaker 59: for. And so we look at
03:45:43 Speaker 59: their using the great county intensification
03:45:45 Speaker 59: targets to determine, you know, how
03:45:47 Speaker 59: does that household, how do those
03:45:49 Speaker 59: forecasted households fit into that particular
03:45:50 Speaker 59: settlement area? And then we look
03:45:52 Speaker 59: at greenfield areas within the settlement
03:45:54 Speaker 59: areas. Field areas within the settlement
03:45:56 Speaker 59: areas, and this is largely where
03:45:59 Speaker 59: those larger would go. And so,
03:46:01 Speaker 59: we want to make sure that
03:46:02 Speaker 59: we do have sufficient land in
03:46:05 Speaker 59: our settlement areas to accommodate that
03:46:07 Speaker 59: greenfield growth. And that's a very
03:46:09 Speaker 59: important part of this exercise because
03:46:11 Speaker 59: a lot of our servicing and
03:46:15 Speaker 59: infrastructure decisions rely then on on
03:46:17 Speaker 59: those numbers as well. And so,
03:46:19 Speaker 59: for this one, when we're looking
03:46:21 Speaker 59: at those land needs, we have
03:46:23 Speaker 59: factored in all of the permit
03:46:36 Speaker 59: data until the end of twenty
03:46:39 Speaker 59: twenty four. So we are. basing
03:46:42 Speaker 59: this from a twenty twenty five
03:46:43 Speaker 59: onward forecast. So looking at the
03:46:46 Speaker 59: units that will be required in
03:46:52 Speaker 59: those settlement areas, looking at the
03:46:54 Speaker 59: land need that will go with
03:46:56 Speaker 59: that for twenty five onwards, accounting
03:46:58 Speaker 60: for what's already in process. And
03:47:00 Speaker 53: I would, the last point I
03:47:03 Speaker 53: just wanted to say there is,
03:47:05 Speaker 53: so the data gathering for this
03:47:07 Speaker 53: process has been intense. We have
03:47:10 Speaker 53: a lot of pieces that go
03:47:12 Speaker 59: into it. I just want to
03:47:13 Speaker 59: extend my thanks to the municipal
03:47:16 Speaker 59: staff. Medical staff. It's been a
03:47:18 Speaker 59: lot of back and forth, and
03:47:19 Speaker 59: a lot of data gathering and
03:47:22 Speaker 59: sharing, and so that we couldn't
03:47:24 Speaker 59: do that exercise without those efforts.
03:47:25 Speaker 59: So, really, really appreciate that. Okay,
03:47:26 Speaker 59: so I won't spend a whole
03:47:28 Speaker 59: lot of time with each of
03:47:29 Speaker 59: these slides. I I will go
03:47:30 Speaker 59: through. Sorry, I just I figured
03:47:33 Speaker 59: that that would be a logical
03:47:35 Speaker 59: pause to just make sure that
03:47:40 Speaker 59: we could catch up on any
03:47:41 Speaker 59: questions, and so I'll just put
03:47:44 Speaker 59: it out there if there are
03:47:47 Speaker 59: any. So I'll just put it
03:47:50 Speaker 59: out there. Are there any questions
03:47:51 Speaker 59: from? And if somebody could watch
03:47:52 Speaker 59: the virtual hands for me, question
03:47:55 Speaker 59: from Councillor Mack. Make meta more.
03:47:59 Speaker 59: Thanks, Liz, for the information so
03:48:02 Speaker 59: far. In just one of the
03:48:05 Speaker 59: previous slides, it had own sound
03:48:08 Speaker 59: and Hanover as primary settlement areas.
03:48:10 Speaker 59: What's the determination? Is that a
03:48:11 Speaker 59: population figure? Like when does Dundalk,
03:48:13 Speaker 59: Meaford, for example, become a primary
03:48:15 Speaker 59: settlement? area. Thanks. Thank you to
03:48:16 Speaker 61: you, Madam Warden. So, so I
03:48:20 Speaker 61: think it's regional center is is
03:48:22 Speaker 61: the reference I was making there.
03:48:23 Speaker 61: So I think primary settlement areas.
03:48:25 Speaker 61: Um, we do have a number
03:48:29 Speaker 61: of those across the county. Those
03:48:30 Speaker 61: are defined in the official plan.
03:48:33 Speaker 61: So that's your your serviced urban
03:48:35 Speaker 62: settlements are typically called primary. The
03:48:38 Speaker 62: reference that we've made is more
03:48:40 Speaker 30: to regional centers. Um, and so
03:48:42 Speaker 30: I'd reference. Stone Sound and Hanover
03:48:43 Speaker 30: in that regard. And so, I
03:48:46 Speaker 30: think it is it is to
03:48:46 Speaker 30: to do with the size and
03:48:49 Speaker 30: scale as well as the nature
03:48:52 Speaker 59: of the various uses that are
03:48:54 Speaker 59: included. So, I think I don't
03:48:56 Speaker 59: know that we've got kind of
03:48:58 Speaker 59: a formal definition that we're using,
03:48:59 Speaker 59: but I think those locations that
03:49:01 Speaker 59: are really subject of that rural
03:49:03 Speaker 59: to urban migration, I think definitely
03:49:06 Speaker 59: would qualify under that. And I
03:49:10 Speaker 59: think it's a scale consideration for
03:49:15 Speaker 59: those regional centers that we're pulling
03:49:17 Speaker 59: from with a large. From, like
03:49:18 Speaker 59: a large area, just to access
03:49:22 Speaker 59: the services that would be located
03:49:24 Speaker 59: within. So I would say Barry,
03:49:26 Speaker 59: for example, would be a regional
03:49:28 Speaker 59: center. Collingwood probably as well. Where
03:49:30 Speaker 59: are you driving when you need
03:49:33 Speaker 59: to do those? You know, access
03:49:36 Speaker 59: your healthcare, that kind of thing.
03:49:37 Speaker 59: Thanks, Liz. So, in that definition
03:49:39 Speaker 57: you just gave, I would think
03:49:41 Speaker 57: Miford would be one of those
03:49:44 Speaker 57: same areas that people would drive
03:49:47 Speaker 57: to for the services that you
03:49:50 Speaker 57: indicated. Thanks so much. You know,
03:49:52 Speaker 57: I think with this one, so
03:49:53 Speaker 57: all of those primary settlement areas
03:49:54 Speaker 57: likely have a catchment area that's
03:49:58 Speaker 57: contributing to to folks driving into
03:50:00 Speaker 57: those centers. I live in Miford.
03:50:02 Speaker 57: I live in Meadford. You know,
03:50:06 Speaker 57: I think we certainly do have
03:50:09 Speaker 57: a variety of different housing types,
03:50:11 Speaker 57: but I think it's the size
03:50:14 Speaker 57: and scale and mix of uses,
03:50:16 Speaker 57: really, that would constitute that regional
03:50:17 Speaker 57: center, pulling from the much larger
03:50:19 Speaker 57: catchment as opposed to the more
03:50:21 Speaker 57: localized regional or sort of rural
03:50:24 Speaker 59: areas around it. Thank you. I
03:50:27 Speaker 59: can look to see if I
03:50:29 Speaker 59: can get you a more formal
03:50:30 Speaker 59: definition. The consultant may have one
03:50:33 Speaker 59: kind of in the back of
03:50:35 Speaker 59: the mind they use for that
03:50:37 Speaker 59: purpose. But thank you. Okay, we'll
03:50:40 Speaker 59: go to a question online from
03:50:44 Speaker 59: Councilor Queen. Yeah, thank you, Mayor
03:50:46 Speaker 59: Warden, and yeah, a lot of
03:50:48 Speaker 59: good information there. Just on that
03:50:50 Speaker 59: information, and obviously we're gonna have
03:50:54 Speaker 59: a motion to receive that. This
03:50:56 Speaker 59: is something we ran into a
03:50:58 Speaker 59: few years back with the with
03:51:00 Speaker 59: the school in Markdale and updated
03:51:02 Speaker 59: planning information, and and they had
03:51:04 Speaker 59: old data that didn't really. reflect
03:51:07 Speaker 59: on, you know, the projection of
03:51:08 Speaker 59: of school population. So, do you
03:51:09 Speaker 59: want to briefly speak to that,
03:51:11 Speaker 59: or do they get they? Are
03:51:12 Speaker 59: they have the opportunity to be
03:51:14 Speaker 59: shared this information because for planning
03:51:16 Speaker 59: for schools and everything else, like
03:51:18 Speaker 59: we see the growth that. Well,
03:51:20 Speaker 59: the the now looking at building
03:51:21 Speaker 59: some new school or new school
03:51:22 Speaker 59: there and that. Any thoughts on
03:51:25 Speaker 59: that? How we how we share
03:51:27 Speaker 59: that? Great, thank you. and to
03:51:29 Speaker 59: you, Madam Warden. So yes, we
03:51:33 Speaker 59: have been in in conversation with
03:51:34 Speaker 59: the school boards. So the school
03:51:35 Speaker 59: boards have received the the same
03:51:37 Speaker 59: package, the slide deck that you
03:51:39 Speaker 59: have received as well. I shared
03:51:40 Speaker 59: those out last week, so that's
03:51:42 Speaker 59: gone to Bluewater District School Board
03:51:44 Speaker 59: as well as the Catholic School
03:51:46 Speaker 59: Board. We've also included their strategic
03:51:47 Speaker 59: planning consultant with Watson, who helps
03:51:48 Speaker 59: with their data. So so Josh
03:51:49 Speaker 59: Plenty has been engaged with that
03:51:50 Speaker 59: as well. So. I would know.
03:51:53 Speaker 59: Just while I'm at it, we've
03:51:54 Speaker 63: also done so with the hospital
03:51:57 Speaker 63: boards as well, so and those
03:51:58 Speaker 63: health organizations. Okay, thank you. Thank
03:51:59 Speaker 63: you. Okay, we'll go to Councillor
03:52:00 Speaker 63: Kevany. Thank you, Madam Warden, and
03:52:01 Speaker 63: Liz. I'm just curious to know
03:52:04 Speaker 63: as you're looking at the forecasting,
03:52:05 Speaker 63: if you take into account projects
03:52:07 Speaker 63: such as the TC Energy pumped
03:52:09 Speaker 63: storage, we know Meekert has. We
03:52:10 Speaker 63: know Meeker is listed currently as
03:52:13 Speaker 63: the second lowest growth. Now, should
03:52:14 Speaker 63: that project come to fruition, that
03:52:15 Speaker 63: will have a huge impact on
03:52:17 Speaker 63: on your numbers. So, I understand
03:52:19 Speaker 63: you have to be conservative, and
03:52:21 Speaker 63: the project again is not approved
03:52:24 Speaker 63: yet. So, would you wait until
03:52:25 Speaker 63: the next opportunity to revisit this
03:52:26 Speaker 63: the growth management status update to
03:52:28 Speaker 63: incorporate those numbers, or do you
03:52:31 Speaker 63: somehow keep that in the back
03:52:32 Speaker 63: of your mind as because you're
03:52:40 Speaker 63: working with numbers now? Thank you.
03:52:42 Speaker 63: I really appreciate that question, and
03:52:43 Speaker 63: for you. So I think I
03:52:45 Speaker 63: don't know that we've necessarily specifically
03:52:46 Speaker 63: worked that in in terms of
03:52:47 Speaker 63: expectations. We have tried to capture
03:52:53 Speaker 63: everything that's in the development pipeline
03:52:55 Speaker 63: in terms of residential uses that
03:52:58 Speaker 63: we're aware of. My thought is
03:53:01 Speaker 20: that perhaps that would be picked
03:53:02 Speaker 20: up. These exercises happen about every
03:53:03 Speaker 20: five years. So my thought is
03:53:05 Speaker 20: as that materialize. That materializes or
03:53:06 Speaker 20: becomes firm, and as we see,
03:53:08 Speaker 20: kind of growth expectations that might
03:53:10 Speaker 59: come along with that in terms
03:53:12 Speaker 59: of housing-related projects, I feel that
03:53:14 Speaker 59: that would get reflected, perhaps, in
03:53:16 Speaker 59: that next iteration. That said, you
03:53:20 Speaker 59: know, I know for large-scale residential
03:53:22 Speaker 59: developments, for Great Highlands, for example,
03:53:24 Speaker 59: we we have considered that there
03:53:26 Speaker 59: are some kind of plans in
03:53:28 Speaker 59: place with respect to some of
03:53:31 Speaker 59: the applications in Beaver Valley.
03:53:33 Speaker 59: that intention is reflected in the
03:53:35 Speaker 59: numbers. We picked up some of
03:53:38 Speaker 59: those proposed units, but I think
03:53:40 Speaker 59: the expectation is that really that
03:53:42 Speaker 59: wouldn't be coming online until later,
03:53:44 Speaker 59: and so we've been very cautious,
03:53:46 Speaker 59: I guess, with the degree to
03:53:50 Speaker 59: which we're leaning on that in
03:53:52 Speaker 59: in terms of the survey or
03:53:54 Speaker 59: sorry, in terms of the exercise.
03:53:57 Speaker 59: So we do have the opportunity
03:53:58 Speaker 59: to build in some of those
03:54:01 Speaker 59: through the understanding of what's in
03:54:03 Speaker 59: the pipeline, development pipeline for residential,
03:54:06 Speaker 59: but I think we would would
03:54:09 Speaker 59: like. But I think we would
03:54:11 Speaker 59: would likely need to capture that
03:54:12 Speaker 59: at the next period as it
03:54:15 Speaker 59: translates into thousands of applications. And
03:54:17 Speaker 59: I think Scott may have some
03:54:20 Speaker 59: further comments around that as well.
03:54:23 Speaker 59: Yeah, thank you, through you, Madam
03:54:26 Speaker 59: Warden. Just to build on what
03:54:27 Speaker 59: Liz has said to Councillor Cummins'
03:54:29 Speaker 59: questions, one of the processes here
03:54:32 Speaker 59: was that we did meet one
03:54:34 Speaker 59: on one with each of the
03:54:36 Speaker 59: nine member municipalities, and we tried
03:54:38 Speaker 59: to flag, as Liz said, we
03:54:39 Speaker 59: we we focused a lot on
03:54:41 Speaker 59: on what's in the immediate pipeline.
03:54:47 Speaker 59: What do we know we have
03:54:48 Speaker 59: applications for and approvals for? and
03:54:49 Speaker 59: everything else that might not be
03:54:50 Speaker 59: built yet, but we did flag
03:54:52 Speaker 59: a number of those bigger sort
03:54:54 Speaker 59: of economic drivers. Some that are
03:54:56 Speaker 59: more certain and some that are
03:54:57 Speaker 59: less certain. So the two
03:54:59 Speaker 59: that come to mind is we
03:55:03 Speaker 59: did flag the TC Energy project
03:55:05 Speaker 59: and we did flag some of
03:55:06 Speaker 59: the the major plans at the
03:55:09 Speaker 59: Bruce as well, because we know
03:55:11 Speaker 59: whether they come online in the
03:55:12 Speaker 59: short term or the longer term.
03:55:14 Speaker 59: Given that this is going to
03:55:15 Speaker 59: 2051, that they could have a
03:55:19 Speaker 59: big impact. And and so the
03:55:20 Speaker 59: you know the consultant was definitely
03:55:22 Speaker 59: taking notes there as to how.
03:55:24 Speaker 59: those exactly influenced, you know,
03:55:27 Speaker 59: Miford's numbers on either employment or
03:55:29 Speaker 59: or population. We'd need to touch
03:55:31 Speaker 59: base again with the consultant, but
03:55:34 Speaker 59: we tried to flag some of
03:55:35 Speaker 59: those bigger ecosystem things that that
03:55:37 Speaker 59: could have a major impact on
03:55:38 Speaker 59: Gray's growth as a whole and
03:55:40 Speaker 59: individual municipal municipal group as well.
03:55:42 Speaker 59: Okay, great. Well, in the interest
03:55:43 Speaker 59: of time, then we'll keep moving.
03:55:45 Speaker 59: If you come up with a
03:55:47 Speaker 59: question, then you'll still have an
03:55:50 Speaker 59: opportunity. after the next slides. Go
03:55:53 Speaker 59: ahead, please. Wonderful. Wonderful. Thank you
03:55:55 Speaker 59: very much. Okay, so I think
03:55:57 Speaker 59: so. In the second portion of
03:55:58 Speaker 59: the presentation, so I have included
03:56:01 Speaker 59: the slides as are included in
03:56:03 Speaker 59: the deck for each of the
03:56:05 Speaker 59: local allocations. I think we'll use
03:56:08 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains just as an example
03:56:14 Speaker 59: to orient ourselves to the slides.
03:56:16 Speaker 59: I have a few brief comments,
03:56:19 Speaker 59: just based on kind of the
03:56:21 Speaker 59: conversations we've had with the consultant
03:56:24 Speaker 59: and local staff. Into local staff,
03:56:26 Speaker 59: but we'll whip through those quite
03:56:27 Speaker 59: quickly. So, each municipality, there are
03:56:29 Speaker 59: two slides in the deck with
03:56:31 Speaker 59: relationship to to the allocations for
03:56:33 Speaker 59: your municipality. And so, there on
03:56:35 Speaker 59: the left hand side, we have
03:56:38 Speaker 59: just kind of snapshot data regarding
03:56:41 Speaker 59: expectations for population growth, residential unit
03:56:44 Speaker 59: growth, and that new jobs over
03:56:45 Speaker 59: that forecast horizon. And then on
03:56:47 Speaker 59: the right hand side, we have
03:56:49 Speaker 59: a graph that's showing that growth
03:56:51 Speaker 59: alongside. the growth that would be
03:56:55 Speaker 59: identified through method A and B
03:56:56 Speaker 59: in that provincial methodology, and so
03:56:58 Speaker 59: in the Blue Mountains example here,
03:57:00 Speaker 59: we can see method A, which
03:57:02 Speaker 59: again is that based on kind
03:57:04 Speaker 59: of current share of census population
03:57:05 Speaker 59: for the county, that is shown
03:57:08 Speaker 59: in green. So that would represent
03:57:11 Speaker 59: a lower growth rate than is
03:57:13 Speaker 59: being forecasted. The method B through
03:57:19 Speaker 59: the provincial methodology, again, just looking
03:57:21 Speaker 59: at the most recent growth period,
03:57:23 Speaker 59: also falls just a little bit
03:57:25 Speaker 59: below where we're expecting the growth
03:57:27 Speaker 59: to go for the municipality of
03:57:30 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains, and I think here
03:57:32 Speaker 59: really the commentary provided by the
03:57:33 Speaker 59: consultant was just all of the
03:57:35 Speaker 59: ingredients are there for continued growth
03:57:38 Speaker 59: of Blue Mountains. The land availability
03:57:41 Speaker 59: is also there as well, and
03:57:42 Speaker 59: so the expectation is that the
03:57:45 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains will capture a slightly
03:57:49 Speaker 59: higher share of the county growth
03:57:54 Speaker 59: over. this coming horizon versus prior
03:57:57 Speaker 59: horizons. Okay, um, this is how
03:58:00 Speaker 59: the residential land needs slides look,
03:58:01 Speaker 59: and again, there's one of these
03:58:03 Speaker 59: for each of the municipalities. Um,
03:58:06 Speaker 59: so you can see at the
03:58:08 Speaker 59: top, um, we've identified the unit
03:58:10 Speaker 59: demand on the left hand side
03:58:12 Speaker 59: and broken that down into that
03:58:14 Speaker 59: rural, urban intensified, intensification, and urban
03:58:15 Speaker 59: greenfield types. We made some assumptions
03:58:18 Speaker 59: regarding the share of unit types
03:58:20 Speaker 59: and how those would be distributed,
03:58:24 Speaker 59: and then. have tallied those up
03:58:29 Speaker 59: together and made a determination based
03:58:31 Speaker 59: on the density of land use
03:58:32 Speaker 59: for those unit types, how much
03:58:37 Speaker 59: land would be required to accommodate
03:58:39 Speaker 59: those that unit. And so, in
03:58:40 Speaker 59: the bottom part of that chart,
03:58:42 Speaker 59: it does show the primary settlement
03:58:44 Speaker 59: areas, the secondary settlement areas, resort
03:58:46 Speaker 59: recreation settlement areas, and then lakes
03:58:48 Speaker 59: and shorelines, and the land available
03:58:51 Speaker 59: there. And so, we've netted out
03:58:53 Speaker 59: that growth need to accommodate all
03:58:55 Speaker 59: of those new units, and at
03:58:57 Speaker 59: the bottom. we have either a
03:59:00 Speaker 59: surplus or a deficit showing for
03:59:02 Speaker 59: that greenfield land supply. So really,
03:59:05 Speaker 59: all this is doing is pulling
03:59:07 Speaker 59: all of that background data together
03:59:08 Speaker 59: into one place, so that you
03:59:11 Speaker 59: can see how those unit expectations
03:59:13 Speaker 59: are coming on for that horizon.
03:59:15 Speaker 59: That we have the land available
03:59:16 Speaker 59: to accommodate that, where that land
03:59:18 Speaker 59: is located, and then looking at
03:59:19 Speaker 59: the net outcome of what remains
03:59:21 Speaker 59: after that growth has been accommodated.
03:59:29 Speaker 59: And so, in the circumstance for
03:59:31 Speaker 59: Blue Mountains, the land supply identified
03:59:34 Speaker 59: is adequate for the growth horizon.
03:59:36 Speaker 59: So, likewise with Chatsworth. So, again,
03:59:39 Speaker 59: we've got the growth management strategy
03:59:41 Speaker 59: figures plotted on the chart there,
03:59:43 Speaker 59: together with method A and B.
03:59:44 Speaker 59: In this case, the expectation is
03:59:46 Speaker 59: that the municipality will grow, but
03:59:49 Speaker 59: that will be incremental and keeping
03:59:54 Speaker 59: with what we've seen historically and
03:59:56 Speaker 59: in the recent past as well.
04:00:00 Speaker 59: And I think here. there's certainly
04:00:02 Speaker 59: a lovely rural character. There's no
04:00:05 Speaker 59: primary fully serviced settlement. However, we
04:00:08 Speaker 59: do attract rural growth. Certainly a
04:00:10 Speaker 59: beautiful landscape, and a good level
04:00:12 Speaker 59: of on farm diversified use for
04:00:13 Speaker 59: employment activity as well. And so
04:00:15 Speaker 59: modest growth in the grand scheme
04:00:18 Speaker 59: of things. And here with that
04:00:19 Speaker 59: growth management versus method A or
04:00:22 Speaker 59: B, the draft growth management strategy
04:00:23 Speaker 59: comes a little bit lower than
04:00:25 Speaker 59: both of those other methods. I
04:00:27 Speaker 59: would identify that the It would
04:00:29 Speaker 59: identify that the current share will
04:00:30 Speaker 59: be a little bit higher than
04:00:33 Speaker 59: the future share of county growth
04:00:35 Speaker 59: and population for Chatsworth, and then
04:00:36 Speaker 59: they would have adequate land supply
04:00:38 Speaker 59: to accommodate that growth. Likewise for
04:00:40 Speaker 59: Georgian Bluffs, so same layout, and
04:00:42 Speaker 59: here as well. So main focus
04:00:43 Speaker 59: of growth being Cobble, East Linton,
04:00:45 Speaker 59: and Shallow Lake, the rural and
04:00:49 Speaker 59: shoreline areas as well. Lots of
04:00:50 Speaker 59: potential and land available. but I
04:00:51 Speaker 59: think the consultant really aimed to
04:00:54 Speaker 59: be quite realistic in terms of
04:00:57 Speaker 59: expectations here, also factoring in consideration
04:01:00 Speaker 59: regarding servicing supply or limitation. I
04:01:01 Speaker 59: guess, but it is well in
04:01:02 Speaker 59: line with recent years and represents
04:01:06 Speaker 59: ongoing city growth. And again, land
04:01:08 Speaker 59: supply is adequate. For Gray Highlands,
04:01:15 Speaker 59: same thing. Lots of recent growth
04:01:16 Speaker 59: and development interest. There are some
04:01:18 Speaker 59: large. There are some large-scale plans
04:01:19 Speaker 59: that are in phasing, and lots
04:01:20 Speaker 59: of short and medium-term growth anticipated
04:01:22 Speaker 59: for Markdale in particular. There is
04:01:24 Speaker 59: perhaps some longer-term development potential as
04:01:26 Speaker 59: well, and so again, speaking to
04:01:29 Speaker 59: those Beaver Valley potential applications. But
04:01:31 Speaker 59: I think the sense was that
04:01:32 Speaker 59: that would be quite a ways
04:01:35 Speaker 59: out, and so that has a
04:01:38 Speaker 59: limited impact on the forecast in
04:01:40 Speaker 59: this iteration. And again, land supply
04:01:44 Speaker 59: is adequate. Okay, for handover. For
04:01:47 Speaker 59: Hanover, so I think here the
04:01:50 Speaker 59: consultant has advised that there's some
04:01:53 Speaker 59: greater certainty through this forecast. This
04:01:54 Speaker 59: is premised on servicing being available,
04:01:56 Speaker 59: or rather, servicing constraints not being
04:01:58 Speaker 59: an impediment to growth over that
04:02:00 Speaker 59: horizon, and that is assumed that
04:02:02 Speaker 59: servicing would be delivered as needed
04:02:03 Speaker 59: through the horizon to support the
04:02:05 Speaker 59: growth. Here, the growth management strategy
04:02:06 Speaker 59: identifies anticipated growth higher than those
04:02:08 Speaker 59: most recent periods and trends for
04:02:09 Speaker 59: Hanover into the future. and again,
04:02:11 Speaker 59: this would represent that interprovincial growth.
04:02:14 Speaker 59: That location to the south, nearer
04:02:15 Speaker 59: to those city centers for in
04:02:18 Speaker 59: migrants, and also that function as
04:02:19 Speaker 59: a regional center to a to
04:02:23 Speaker 59: a very large rural area surrounding.
04:02:25 Speaker 59: And again, this one is
04:02:28 Speaker 59: is not the same as the
04:02:30 Speaker 59: others. Here, there is an identified
04:02:32 Speaker 59: deficit in terms of land supply.
04:02:34 Speaker 59: I think that drives quite well
04:02:38 Speaker 59: with the conversation that we had
04:02:39 Speaker 59: this morning regarding those boundary adjustments.
04:02:44 Speaker 59: For Mefford, again, fairly steady growth
04:02:45 Speaker 59: and development interest has been experienced
04:02:46 Speaker 59: here. I think some servicing constraints
04:02:49 Speaker 59: at play, but have less so
04:02:52 Speaker 59: than than we understood in the
04:02:54 Speaker 59: past. And I think this does
04:02:55 Speaker 59: bring us online for the forecast
04:02:56 Speaker 59: period a little higher, but generally
04:02:58 Speaker 59: in line with the past years
04:03:00 Speaker 59: of growth. So ongoing, steady growth
04:03:02 Speaker 59: is anticipated. Okay. And an adequate
04:03:06 Speaker 59: supply of land to accommodate that
04:03:10 Speaker 59: growth as well. Okay, and then
04:03:12 Speaker 59: Southgate, and we're almost, we're almost
04:03:13 Speaker 59: there. Um, so South Southgate, uh,
04:03:15 Speaker 59: switch my things around. So,
04:03:17 Speaker 59: um, significant plans here for growth.
04:03:19 Speaker 59: Um, and I think we've seen
04:03:22 Speaker 59: quite a bit of growth over
04:03:23 Speaker 59: this most recent period of time.
04:03:26 Speaker 59: Um, so I think we're anticipating
04:03:28 Speaker 59: that we're not going to necessarily
04:03:32 Speaker 59: sustain that very high growth into
04:03:35 Speaker 59: the future. and so therefore we're
04:03:39 Speaker 59: coming in below Method B, but
04:03:41 Speaker 59: we are a little higher than
04:03:44 Speaker 59: kind of that historic share of
04:03:45 Speaker 59: the growth of the county for
04:03:46 Speaker 59: to go forward expected. Certainly, the
04:03:50 Speaker 59: Southgate is not immune to
04:03:54 Speaker 59: the broader slowdown that's happening right
04:03:55 Speaker 59: right now in Ontario, and so
04:03:58 Speaker 59: I think the expectation is, however,
04:04:00 Speaker 59: that after the slowdown, we will
04:04:02 Speaker 59: see a pick up again in
04:04:04 Speaker 59: growth, and that is starting actually
04:04:08 Speaker 59: in some areas to to to
04:04:09 Speaker 59: go. Planning is in place for
04:04:12 Speaker 59: servicing constraints. and so nothing here
04:04:16 Speaker 59: is premised on servicing being an
04:04:17 Speaker 59: impediment. And so I think expected
04:04:20 Speaker 59: to level off a bit, but
04:04:23 Speaker 59: we will see just a little
04:04:25 Speaker 59: bit of a rebound after this
04:04:28 Speaker 59: current slowdown. Okay, and again, land
04:04:30 Speaker 59: supply is determined to be adequate
04:04:33 Speaker 59: there. Okay, and west gray to
04:04:34 Speaker 59: servicefully settlement areas is the note
04:04:38 Speaker 59: I left myself here. So I
04:04:41 Speaker 59: think what I wanted to know.
04:04:43 Speaker 59: So we do. What I
04:04:45 Speaker 59: wanted to know was so we
04:04:47 Speaker 59: do have a number of applications
04:04:48 Speaker 59: in process in Durham, and the
04:04:51 Speaker 59: growth outside of Durham New Stat
04:04:53 Speaker 59: has generally been fairly modest. The
04:04:54 Speaker 59: trajectory is very similar to the
04:04:56 Speaker 59: most recent past, so coming in
04:04:59 Speaker 59: just a little bit below what
04:05:00 Speaker 59: we would anticipate through Method B,
04:05:02 Speaker 59: that recent trend, but ongoing growth
04:05:04 Speaker 59: expected over the horizon for sure.
04:05:07 Speaker 59: Okay, and again, adequate land, okay,
04:05:10 Speaker 59: and then finally, Owen Sound. So
04:05:12 Speaker 59: here, it is identified that we
04:05:14 Speaker 59: anticipate that Owen Sound will grow
04:05:16 Speaker 59: a little higher than this most
04:05:19 Speaker 59: recent period. We certainly have seen
04:05:21 Speaker 59: lots of apartments development happening. The
04:05:23 Speaker 59: Sydenham Heights area is starting to
04:05:25 Speaker 59: get going, and there's lots of
04:05:30 Speaker 59: potential there. And I think we
04:05:32 Speaker 59: just wanted to highlight here as
04:05:34 Speaker 59: well just the work that has
04:05:36 Speaker 59: been put in by the city
04:05:39 Speaker 59: to attract that share of the
04:05:41 Speaker 59: rental market. That's been a conscious
04:05:47 Speaker 59: effort, and I think, or we
04:05:49 Speaker 59: think, there are good reasons. to
04:05:51 Speaker 59: believe that that rental market will
04:05:54 Speaker 59: continue to increase actually over time.
04:05:56 Speaker 59: We've got a significant supply of
04:05:58 Speaker 59: older adults looking at one sound,
04:06:01 Speaker 59: particularly regarding downsizing and access to
04:06:03 Speaker 59: healthcare as well, and those regional
04:06:04 Speaker 59: center amenities. And so we do
04:06:08 Speaker 59: think that demographic forces may drive
04:06:11 Speaker 59: that existing planned apartment construction, but
04:06:12 Speaker 59: perhaps additional in the future as
04:06:14 Speaker 59: well. And so being that this
04:06:16 Speaker 59: is one of those areas that
04:06:17 Speaker 59: is a little bit older, I
04:06:19 Speaker 59: think we do also anticipate that
04:06:21 Speaker 59: age drag on growth applying, you
04:06:24 Speaker 59: know, in sound towards the end
04:06:25 Speaker 59: of the horizon too. So you
04:06:27 Speaker 59: can see the the curve dips
04:06:30 Speaker 59: just a little bit towards the
04:06:33 Speaker 59: end of the horizon, but adequate
04:06:34 Speaker 59: land is identified here as well.
04:06:38 Speaker 59: Okay, and so I just really
04:06:40 Speaker 59: just in summary of of those
04:06:42 Speaker 59: land need assessment pieces, with the
04:06:43 Speaker 59: exception of Panover, all of the
04:06:45 Speaker 59: With the exception of Hanover, all
04:06:48 Speaker 59: of the municipalities are are determined
04:06:50 Speaker 59: to have sufficient lands within designated
04:06:53 Speaker 59: settlements to accommodate the growth forecast
04:06:55 Speaker 59: to twenty fifty one. Hanover does
04:06:56 Speaker 59: require an addition of land for
04:06:58 Speaker 59: this particular planning horizon, but I
04:07:00 Speaker 59: understand that we are looking long
04:07:02 Speaker 59: term strategic growth as well. Okay,
04:07:06 Speaker 59: with respect to employment allocations, so
04:07:09 Speaker 59: that was likely population. We have
04:07:11 Speaker 59: further allocated that overall county employment
04:07:13 Speaker 59: growth to. the member municipalities. Like
04:07:14 Speaker 59: I noted, we break that down
04:07:16 Speaker 59: into a couple of different types
04:07:19 Speaker 59: of employment growth. So general employment,
04:07:20 Speaker 59: so that's your population-driven community retail,
04:07:21 Speaker 59: all of your services, that kind
04:07:24 Speaker 59: of thing. Employment area employment, which
04:07:26 Speaker 59: are those employment lands for more
04:07:27 Speaker 59: so manufacturing type uses, and then
04:07:28 Speaker 59: rural employment. We can see across
04:07:31 Speaker 59: the different municipalities the nature of
04:07:33 Speaker 59: employment growth for each of which
04:07:35 Speaker 59: is different. Forecasts for each is
04:07:37 Speaker 59: different, depending on the factors driving
04:07:39 Speaker 59: that growth. And essentially, through this,
04:07:41 Speaker 59: the allocation is done a little
04:07:42 Speaker 59: bit differently. So we are essentially
04:07:45 Speaker 59: seeking to answer the question: Is
04:07:46 Speaker 59: there enough employment land to accommodate
04:07:48 Speaker 59: that employment growth in the municipality?
04:07:49 Speaker 59: Through the land need exercise, we
04:07:51 Speaker 59: are also considering that general employment,
04:07:53 Speaker 59: but that is often accommodated in
04:07:56 Speaker 59: our residential or general lands, not
04:07:58 Speaker 59: in Control or general lands, not
04:08:01 Speaker 59: employment lands. The expectation is there
04:08:04 Speaker 59: are sufficient lands to accommodate the
04:08:06 Speaker 59: forecast employment growth, notwithstanding the fact
04:08:07 Speaker 59: that both the forecast is ambitious
04:08:09 Speaker 59: based on our plans. And I
04:08:11 Speaker 59: think we just do want to
04:08:13 Speaker 59: flag as well that there are,
04:08:14 Speaker 59: of course, other factors that apply
04:08:15 Speaker 59: to whether this growth will be
04:08:19 Speaker 59: realized. Willing landowners is a really
04:08:20 Speaker 59: big one, and I think speaks
04:08:23 Speaker 59: to the goals with respect to
04:08:24 Speaker 59: municipal employment land ownership that are
04:08:27 Speaker 59: possible. Service Serviceing of lands and
04:08:29 Speaker 59: suitability and attractions. We do have
04:08:31 Speaker 59: adequate lands. Are they in the
04:08:32 Speaker 59: right places for the right opportunities?
04:08:33 Speaker 20: I think is part of the
04:08:35 Speaker 20: discussion that's ongoing. So we're okay.
04:08:37 Speaker 20: We can accommodate that. But there
04:08:38 Speaker 20: certainly would be opportunity to revisit
04:08:40 Speaker 20: and look at that right sizing
04:08:41 Speaker 20: and right location elements. Okay. And
04:08:43 Speaker 20: here, similar to the traits we've
04:08:46 Speaker 20: seen in previous slides, we've identified
04:08:47 Speaker 20: that in. We've identified that employment
04:08:49 Speaker 20: land supply, and then that employment
04:08:50 Speaker 20: land forecast for each of those
04:08:51 Speaker 20: municipalities, and those numbers are shared
04:08:53 Speaker 20: here. And then, just as a
04:08:55 Speaker 20: share of the great county pie,
04:08:56 Speaker 20: in terms of employment land allocation,
04:08:58 Speaker 20: this is how those employment growth
04:08:59 Speaker 20: allocations are distributed amongst us. And
04:09:03 Speaker 20: so, you can see those municipalities
04:09:04 Speaker 20: with that larger land supply are
04:09:06 Speaker 20: are picking up a larger share
04:09:09 Speaker 20: of that. anticipated employment growth over
04:09:13 Speaker 20: the horizon. Okay, so we made
04:09:15 Speaker 20: it through data after lunchtime can
04:09:17 Speaker 20: be a challenge. So thank you
04:09:19 Speaker 20: all for bearing with me. What
04:09:21 Speaker 20: I just wanted to say here,
04:09:23 Speaker 20: just as a means of recap,
04:09:24 Speaker 20: is so you know bringing that
04:09:26 Speaker 20: all together, we do anticipate higher
04:09:28 Speaker 20: population and housing growth all around.
04:09:29 Speaker 20: So for all of the member
04:09:31 Speaker 20: municipalities over this period, notwithstanding the
04:09:33 Speaker 20: current slowdown, we will see a
04:09:36 Speaker 20: rebound. The fundamental drivers of growth
04:09:37 Speaker 20: in grey are multifaceted, expected to
04:09:38 Speaker 20: to remain and and be in
04:09:39 Speaker 20: place for go forward. Higher employment
04:09:41 Speaker 20: growth is anticipated partly because more
04:09:43 Speaker 20: people, and partly to reflect that
04:09:45 Speaker 20: desire for development of additional land
04:09:47 Speaker 20: and opportunity to the employment purposes.
04:09:49 Speaker 20: The residential land supply is sufficient,
04:09:50 Speaker 20: except in Hanover, and employment lands
04:09:53 Speaker 20: are generally sufficient. And so, as
04:09:55 Speaker 20: I noted, that we've shared out
04:09:58 Speaker 20: this deck to the member municipalities,
04:10:00 Speaker 20: we've also shared that along to
04:10:02 Speaker 20: various. community partners in education and
04:10:04 Speaker 20: health. We have been asking for
04:10:07 Speaker 20: feedback with respect to these. These
04:10:08 Speaker 20: are draft local allocations at this
04:10:10 Speaker 20: point in time, and so ideally
04:10:11 Speaker 20: we would love to hear comments
04:10:14 Speaker 20: back prior to the holiday closure,
04:10:16 Speaker 20: wherever possible. We do have a
04:10:18 Speaker 20: number of projects both at the
04:10:20 Speaker 20: county level and local levels that
04:10:25 Speaker 20: are pending with some of this
04:10:26 Speaker 20: data as input, and so we
04:10:27 Speaker 20: do want to move through the
04:10:30 Speaker 20: last part of this process as
04:10:32 Speaker 20: quickly as possible. doing a really
04:10:33 Speaker 20: good job with it, but but
04:10:35 Speaker 20: being expeditious, and so we certainly
04:10:37 Speaker 20: would appreciate any comments that you
04:10:40 Speaker 20: may have on those drafts, and
04:10:43 Speaker 20: could set up conversations with staff
04:10:45 Speaker 20: or consultants if that's maybe needed
04:10:46 Speaker 20: to support that, and so then
04:10:48 Speaker 20: our expectation for the go forward
04:10:49 Speaker 20: would be to come back to
04:10:52 Speaker 59: kind of council it in Q
04:10:54 Speaker 59: one of next year, with a
04:10:56 Speaker 59: report from the consultant with respect
04:10:59 Speaker 59: to all of the background data.
04:11:01 Speaker 59: We only touched the surface here.
04:11:03 Speaker 59: Touch the surface here, and and
04:11:06 Speaker 59: then we would have that wholesome
04:11:07 Speaker 59: opportunity to review that report and
04:11:10 Speaker 59: the final numbers as well. So
04:11:11 Speaker 59: I'll leave it there. Again, happy
04:11:13 Speaker 59: to answer any additional questions that
04:11:17 Speaker 59: may occur. And I think we
04:11:18 Speaker 59: do have Patrick, like we online
04:11:22 Speaker 59: at this point as well. If
04:11:25 Speaker 59: we need his help too. Well,
04:11:28 Speaker 59: thank you very much for all
04:11:30 Speaker 59: that information and the examples that
04:11:32 Speaker 59: go by the municipalities. I think
04:11:35 Speaker 59: will help us translate. to what
04:11:37 Speaker 59: we know on the ground. A
04:11:41 Speaker 59: couple of questions for you, and
04:11:44 Speaker 59: I understand from reading the report
04:11:45 Speaker 59: that this is there's a certain
04:11:47 Speaker 59: formula you have to follow, and
04:11:48 Speaker 59: it's door number one or door
04:11:50 Speaker 59: number two, and you just go
04:11:52 Speaker 59: with that. But I also recognized
04:11:55 Speaker 59: in the report that you do
04:11:57 Speaker 59: tap into whatever data you can
04:11:59 Speaker 59: find: school boards, hospitals, etc. School
04:12:01 Speaker 59: boards are challenging because you can't
04:12:03 Speaker 59: predict anymore if somebody was born
04:12:04 Speaker 59: here that they're going to show
04:12:10 Speaker 59: up for school in that particular
04:12:14 Speaker 59: region five years from now. That's
04:12:15 Speaker 59: this day and age you can't.
04:12:17 Speaker 59: The the day and age you
04:12:20 Speaker 59: can't do all that, but we
04:12:21 Speaker 59: do our best. But the question
04:12:23 Speaker 59: that I have for you then
04:12:24 Speaker 59: is the the estimates of of
04:12:25 Speaker 59: the growth of the number
04:12:29 Speaker 59: of dwellings. How does that take
04:12:31 Speaker 59: into account the variability of those
04:12:35 Speaker 59: dwellings? So I I I would
04:12:38 Speaker 59: lean into your expertise as as
04:12:41 Speaker 59: planning that you would be able
04:12:44 Speaker 59: to identify density, for example, in
04:12:45 Speaker 59: various different official plans of various
04:12:46 Speaker 59: different towns. But then there's always
04:12:48 Speaker 59: a variation in that density, right?
04:12:49 Speaker 59: So, if something's being built to
04:12:51 Speaker 59: the sparsest, to the biggest homes,
04:12:53 Speaker 59: the biggest lots, as opposed to
04:12:54 Speaker 59: the smallest of the what's allowable
04:12:56 Speaker 59: in that zone, how do you
04:12:57 Speaker 59: accommodate for that? How do you
04:12:59 Speaker 59: accommodate for accounting for the number
04:13:00 Speaker 59: of dwellings that are going to
04:13:03 Speaker 59: be built but are not going
04:13:04 Speaker 59: to actually increase the population because
04:13:06 Speaker 59: it will be people that are
04:13:09 Speaker 59: using it for secondary residence? And
04:13:10 Speaker 59: then also, how do you mix
04:13:13 Speaker 59: into all that when homes are
04:13:15 Speaker 59: being sold to somebody who is
04:13:18 Speaker 59: not an employment-age individual who Age
04:13:20 Speaker 59: individual who is not, you know,
04:13:22 Speaker 59: could just be two retirees moving
04:13:25 Speaker 59: up to what looks like another
04:13:26 Speaker 59: house on the the the plate,
04:13:28 Speaker 59: and then finally the connected to
04:13:29 Speaker 59: all that. Then is how did
04:13:31 Speaker 59: you get the general educate general
04:13:33 Speaker 59: employment numbers? I can see how
04:13:35 Speaker 59: you can calculate the employment area
04:13:37 Speaker 59: because you can look to see
04:13:38 Speaker 59: where the the available employment lands,
04:13:39 Speaker 59: but that general one is that
04:13:41 Speaker 59: just simply a mathematical calculation on
04:13:43 Speaker 59: what I've just mentioned, which might
04:13:45 Speaker 59: not actually be very accurate. Thank
04:13:46 Speaker 59: you. Okay, a lot there to
04:13:54 Speaker 59: unpack, and I may I may
04:13:56 Speaker 59: call a friend on certain elements
04:13:57 Speaker 59: of that, but you know I
04:13:58 Speaker 59: think I can speak to some
04:14:01 Speaker 59: of it, and maybe we'll we'll
04:14:05 Speaker 59: take in Scott and perhaps Patrick
04:14:07 Speaker 59: as well. So I think for
04:14:09 Speaker 59: the estimated growth for the dwellings,
04:14:10 Speaker 59: so that is we're taking the
04:14:12 Speaker 51: population, we're looking at those headship
04:14:13 Speaker 51: rates and the age cohorts in
04:14:15 Speaker 51: that community to determine you know
04:14:17 Speaker 51: how many households is that population
04:14:20 Speaker 51: translating into? Then, once we have
04:14:22 Speaker 51: that understanding of households, we are
04:14:24 Speaker 51: looking at existing trends. I imagine
04:14:25 Speaker 51: there's some secret sauce in Hemson's
04:14:27 Speaker 51: formula as well that relates to
04:14:28 Speaker 51: that. But translating them into those
04:14:30 Speaker 51: three different unit types, so we've
04:14:31 Speaker 51: got singles and semis, rows and
04:14:32 Speaker 51: apartments. So, trying to kind of
04:14:35 Speaker 51: represent a few different types of
04:14:36 Speaker 51: units that take different land
04:14:38 Speaker 51: needs to accommodate. And then we're
04:14:40 Speaker 51: looking at those. various locations, so
04:14:42 Speaker 51: rural secondary settlements, and and then
04:14:43 Speaker 51: also the primary settlements. So for
04:14:46 Speaker 51: those secondary settlements, we do have
04:14:48 Speaker 51: intensification targets in place for both
04:14:49 Speaker 51: primary and secondary. So we use
04:14:51 Speaker 51: those intensification targets and do some
04:14:52 Speaker 51: math around those unit types by
04:14:54 Speaker 51: location, and then we, yeah. So
04:14:56 Speaker 51: I think so that is getting
04:14:57 Speaker 51: us closer to kind of that
04:15:00 Speaker 51: that land need. and our understanding
04:15:02 Speaker 51: of what types of units are
04:15:04 Speaker 51: going where, for the primary settlement
04:15:07 Speaker 51: areas, the official plan does also
04:15:09 Speaker 51: identify minimum density thresholds. So I
04:15:10 Speaker 51: think that factors into those equations
04:15:11 Speaker 51: as well. So it really is
04:15:15 Speaker 51: based in the policy framework that
04:15:17 Speaker 51: we have here. Those figures really
04:15:19 Speaker 51: do help in this exercise to
04:15:20 Speaker 51: discern what's what's coming. With respect
04:15:22 Speaker 51: to the the secondary homes or
04:15:24 Speaker 51: seasonal units, so the final report
04:15:27 Speaker 51: that you see come back to
04:15:28 Speaker 51: you will include a seasonal forecast
04:15:31 Speaker 51: as well. That is a part
04:15:33 Speaker 51: of this process; it's just not
04:15:35 Speaker 51: captured here. So the intention is
04:15:39 Speaker 51: that the figures you're looking at
04:15:40 Speaker 51: would be permanent populations, the permanent
04:15:43 Speaker 51: resident, whereas there will be a
04:15:45 Speaker 51: seasonal allocation and forecast also advanced
04:15:46 Speaker 51: in in the beginning of next
04:15:48 Speaker 51: year. And with respect to the
04:15:49 Speaker 51: retirees, so I think. you know
04:15:50 Speaker 51: what that one is probably where
04:15:51 Speaker 51: I need to call a friend
04:15:53 Speaker 51: just to kind of understand. You
04:15:55 Speaker 51: know, I think they would be
04:15:57 Speaker 51: picked up in our demographic data.
04:15:59 Speaker 51: I don't necessarily know that we're
04:16:02 Speaker 51: looking at it in terms of
04:16:03 Speaker 51: you know who's in each household,
04:16:06 Speaker 51: but we are looking at kind
04:16:08 Speaker 51: of those population level statistics. So
04:16:10 Speaker 51: I imagine that that would get
04:16:13 Speaker 51: picked up just based on the
04:16:15 Speaker 51: census information we collect the next
04:16:16 Speaker 51: time around, and that would be
04:16:17 Speaker 51: factored in their contribution as well.
04:16:18 Speaker 51: But like I said, you know,
04:16:20 Speaker 51: I think we have seen. that
04:16:21 Speaker 51: participation rate and the workforce activity
04:16:22 Speaker 51: rate declining, and that's likely a
04:16:25 Speaker 51: result of those senior populations moving
04:16:26 Speaker 51: to this area. And so, I
04:16:28 Speaker 51: think the challenge becomes with that
04:16:31 Speaker 51: demographic force. You know, how are
04:16:33 Speaker 51: we doing the work around employment
04:16:34 Speaker 51: lands to try and shift that
04:16:35 Speaker 51: trend to bring other folks into
04:16:37 Speaker 51: those units that are going to
04:16:38 Speaker 51: participate in the workforce as well?
04:16:41 Speaker 51: But I don't think it's a
04:16:42 Speaker 51: negative that those retirees are coming.
04:16:44 Speaker 51: I think it's we just they'll
04:16:47 Speaker 51: have to be factored into the
04:16:48 Speaker 51: data. You said maybe I'd open
04:16:51 Speaker 51: it to Scott or or perhaps
04:16:52 Speaker 51: Patrick, these available if they wanted
04:16:53 Speaker 51: to speak anything further to that
04:16:55 Speaker 51: piece. Just briefly through you, Madam
04:16:56 Speaker 51: Warden. Thank you, Liz. I I
04:16:59 Speaker 51: think just to touch on some
04:17:01 Speaker 51: of the points that that Liz
04:17:02 Speaker 51: talked about there, the the the
04:17:04 Speaker 51: projection the forecast to date are
04:17:05 Speaker 51: are are based on the Ministry
04:17:08 Speaker 51: of Finance numbers and and and
04:17:09 Speaker 51: their Finance numbers and and and
04:17:11 Speaker 51: they're based on the context in
04:17:13 Speaker 51: front of us today. And one
04:17:15 Speaker 51: of the one of the reasons
04:17:17 Speaker 51: why we do review this roughly
04:17:18 Speaker 51: every three to five years is
04:17:20 Speaker 51: because things change. So if any
04:17:22 Speaker 51: individual municipality in grade decided they
04:17:24 Speaker 51: weren't seeing the types of houses
04:17:27 Speaker 20: they needed most, maybe mostly you
04:17:28 Speaker 20: have large singles and you need
04:17:30 Speaker 20: more apartments, and and you took
04:17:31 Speaker 20: a big policy swing, so to
04:17:33 Speaker 20: speak, to increase your densities to
04:17:35 Speaker 20: do things that were going to
04:17:38 Speaker 20: be more supportive of apartments, then
04:17:39 Speaker 20: we could see that shift, and
04:17:41 Speaker 20: that shift affects a number of
04:17:45 Speaker 20: things. including infrastructure planning, but also
04:17:48 Speaker 20: land need, and and so you
04:17:50 Speaker 20: know when we looked at this
04:17:52 Speaker 20: back in two thousand eight or
04:17:55 Speaker 20: in two thousand fifteen, we didn't
04:17:57 Speaker 20: necessarily anticipate the share of apartments
04:17:59 Speaker 20: in the city of Olmstead that
04:18:00 Speaker 20: we're seeing now, and the city's
04:18:01 Speaker 20: done a lot of targeted work
04:18:04 Speaker 20: in that regard to to change
04:18:07 Speaker 20: that. So I'd say the same
04:18:11 Speaker 20: goes for sort of any municipality
04:18:14 Speaker 20: that can get conditions can change,
04:18:19 Speaker 20: and and you know those breakdowns
04:18:21 Speaker 20: of singles and semis and towns
04:18:23 Speaker 20: and and apartments. will change and
04:18:34 Speaker 20: evolve over time. And the only
04:18:37 Speaker 43: other thing I'd say with respect
04:18:38 Speaker 43: to some of what Liz shared
04:18:40 Speaker 43: is that seasonal forecast piece. As
04:18:42 Speaker 43: folks around the horseshoe will probably
04:18:44 Speaker 43: know, it affects some municipalities more
04:18:45 Speaker 43: than others, where we have larger
04:18:48 Speaker 43: numbers of seasonal residents. But the
04:18:49 Speaker 64: one thing that Henson has said
04:18:51 Speaker 64: to us in past growth management
04:18:52 Speaker 51: exercises, and we've even seen this
04:18:53 Speaker 51: anecdotally with county and municipal staff,
04:18:56 Speaker 51: is to some degree a house
04:18:58 Speaker 51: is a house. and and it
04:19:02 Speaker 51: can shift in its housing capacity
04:19:04 Speaker 51: over time. And and what I
04:19:06 Speaker 51: mean is, maybe somebody builds a
04:19:09 Speaker 51: single detached dwelling, and that's their
04:19:10 Speaker 51: second home. They live in Toronto
04:19:11 Speaker 51: or Kitchener, and they come up
04:19:13 Speaker 51: here, you know, for certain months
04:19:15 Speaker 51: of the year, kind of thing.
04:19:16 Speaker 51: But they go to sell that
04:19:18 Speaker 51: home, and and and then that's
04:19:19 Speaker 51: bought by somebody who's a permanent
04:19:21 Speaker 51: resident here. So we used to
04:19:22 Speaker 51: put more stock into trying to
04:19:24 Speaker 51: distinguish between seasonal homes versus permanent
04:19:25 Speaker 51: homes, and and in some municipalities.
04:19:29 Speaker 51: where you might have sort of
04:19:32 Speaker 51: a non winterized cottage that might
04:19:33 Speaker 51: have more stock, but certainly with
04:19:34 Speaker 51: a lot of the the residential
04:19:36 Speaker 51: development we're seeing today, it really
04:19:37 Speaker 51: in some cases does come down
04:19:40 Speaker 51: to who the buyer is and
04:19:42 Speaker 51: and what they choose to use
04:19:43 Speaker 51: that to. And and again, in
04:19:45 Speaker 51: some cases, someone could buy as
04:19:47 Speaker 51: their seasonal home and then choose
04:19:49 Speaker 51: to retire here and that's their
04:19:50 Speaker 51: permanent home. So as Liz said,
04:19:53 Speaker 51: we will have some further thoughts
04:19:53 Speaker 51: on that in in the final
04:19:56 Speaker 51: report, but with with subsequent growth
04:19:58 Speaker 51: management. strategies, it's become less of
04:20:01 Speaker 51: a an issue, if you will,
04:20:02 Speaker 51: because we are seeing more of
04:20:05 Speaker 51: that transition. and And Madam Warden,
04:20:07 Speaker 51: just to bring it back to
04:20:09 Speaker 51: your own municipality, and and CEO
04:20:10 Speaker 51: Scherzer will be aware of this
04:20:12 Speaker 51: as well. When we first started
04:20:14 Speaker 51: talking about the windfall development years
04:20:15 Speaker 51: ago, you know, it was primarily
04:20:16 Speaker 51: thought that that would be largely
04:20:19 Speaker 51: seasonal. And and then as it
04:20:22 Speaker 51: started to build out, and we
04:20:23 Speaker 51: saw more families in there, and
04:20:25 Speaker 51: people expecting, you know, school bus
04:20:26 Speaker 51: pickup and everything else, you know,
04:20:28 Speaker 51: these are sort of very educated
04:20:29 Speaker 51: best guesses, and and we need
04:20:32 Speaker 51: to review and adapt over time.
04:20:33 Speaker 51: And so, if that turn it
04:20:35 Speaker 51: back to to you, Madam Ward.
04:20:37 Speaker 51: Thank you. I was going to
04:20:40 Speaker 51: use that exact example that the
04:20:41 Speaker 51: opposite can happen as well, and
04:20:43 Speaker 51: that and we we have there's
04:20:46 Speaker 51: no way that we can tap
04:20:47 Speaker 51: into the data of who might
04:20:50 Speaker 51: be buying these dwellings. So that
04:20:52 Speaker 51: that was my curious picture. The
04:20:54 Speaker 51: one piece of data though that
04:20:56 Speaker 51: that is concrete is you can
04:20:58 Speaker 51: compare the census, the 2021 census
04:21:01 Speaker 51: of people who are identifying. So
04:21:02 Speaker 51: people who are identifying it as
04:21:04 Speaker 51: their first home, and then you
04:21:10 Speaker 51: can compare it to the voter
04:21:13 Speaker 51: list of the previous election, and
04:21:15 Speaker 51: you will see a stark difference
04:21:18 Speaker 51: in some municipalities. So that that
04:21:19 Speaker 51: is concrete. That is something that
04:21:22 Speaker 51: we do have access to numbers,
04:21:23 Speaker 51: not names, but but the actual
04:21:26 Speaker 51: numbers. Okay. So with that, then
04:21:27 Speaker 51: further questions. I'm looking online. I'm
04:21:28 Speaker 20: not seeing a hand up. We'll
04:21:31 Speaker 20: go to Councillor Eccles. Just a
04:21:34 Speaker 20: quick question. It's always on the
04:21:34 Speaker 20: forecast, and we got to keep
04:21:36 Speaker 20: going year to year. You know,
04:21:38 Speaker 20: five years out, we got to
04:21:43 Speaker 20: review it again because this changed,
04:21:48 Speaker 20: that's changed. We're using Hemson to
04:21:51 Speaker 20: keep developing this going forward. Hemson's
04:21:52 Speaker 20: done this now for four or
04:21:55 Speaker 20: five terms. Turnovers. What's their percentage?
04:21:57 Speaker 20: Are they as good as a
04:21:59 Speaker 20: weatherman? Like they're at twenty percent
04:22:02 Speaker 20: projection correctness? I'll take a shot
04:22:04 Speaker 20: at that one, too, Madam Warden.
04:22:06 Speaker 20: So, in in my time at
04:22:07 Speaker 20: the county, the first time we
04:22:09 Speaker 20: did a growth management strategy because
04:22:10 Speaker 20: it was a new requirement of
04:22:12 Speaker 20: the provincial policy statement at the
04:22:13 Speaker 20: time was 2007-2008, and I was
04:22:16 Speaker 20: actually, as Liz was presenting, I
04:22:18 Speaker 20: was just looking back at that
04:22:20 Speaker 20: growth management strategy. That wasn't Hemson
04:22:24 Speaker 20: that did that. That was a
04:22:26 Speaker 20: firm called Malone. and Parsons, and
04:22:28 Speaker 20: and at that time, one of
04:22:32 Speaker 20: the big revelations in in in
04:22:36 Speaker 20: that study was that Southgate was
04:22:37 Speaker 20: going to absolutely boom, uh, and
04:22:42 Speaker 20: and the prediction at that time
04:22:43 Speaker 20: was that because the province in
04:22:45 Speaker 20: two thousand four ish had introduced
04:22:46 Speaker 65: the green belt, that we would
04:22:51 Speaker 65: see developers leapfrogging the green belt
04:22:53 Speaker 65: was the term at the time,
04:22:56 Speaker 65: and Southgate was primed to actually
04:22:58 Speaker 65: boom, and so we finished that
04:23:00 Speaker 65: study in about April two thousand
04:23:02 Speaker 65: eight, and I think everybody knows
04:23:04 Speaker 65: what happened in April two. thousand
04:23:06 Speaker 65: eight and April two thousand nine,
04:23:08 Speaker 65: or into two thousand nine. We
04:23:10 Speaker 65: had the the global recession, and
04:23:12 Speaker 65: and we didn't see that predicted
04:23:13 Speaker 65: growth in Southgate and some of
04:23:17 Speaker 65: the other municipalities to the same
04:23:20 Speaker 65: degree that we thought we would.
04:23:23 Speaker 65: So fast forward to two thousand
04:23:25 Speaker 65: fourteen. That's when we first retained
04:23:27 Speaker 65: Hempson to do the work. They
04:23:30 Speaker 65: built upon the work that was
04:23:33 Speaker 65: done by the Malone Gibbons Parsons
04:23:36 Speaker 65: and and adjusted some of the
04:23:38 Speaker 65: numbers. But when I reflect
04:23:42 Speaker 65: back on on that original two
04:23:45 Speaker 65: thousand eight study and and that
04:23:47 Speaker 65: two thousand 2008 study and and
04:23:50 Speaker 65: that 2008 study was was forecasting
04:23:52 Speaker 65: us all the way out to
04:23:54 Speaker 65: the year 2031, which at the
04:23:57 Speaker 65: time seemed eons away and now
04:23:58 Speaker 65: seems strangely close. It's it's actually
04:24:00 Speaker 65: not that far off and and
04:24:01 Speaker 65: no doubt we've seen you know
04:24:04 Speaker 65: individual trends that we didn't predict
04:24:07 Speaker 65: and and you know nobody sort
04:24:10 Speaker 65: of had the the pandemic on
04:24:12 Speaker 65: their bingo card or what that
04:24:14 Speaker 65: would do to to the growth
04:24:16 Speaker 65: in that regard. But as we
04:24:18 Speaker 65: get to reflect back and look
04:24:20 Speaker 65: at this in a longer term
04:24:29 Speaker 65: view, we are seeing. sort of
04:24:32 Speaker 65: greater accuracy there. We're no no
04:24:34 Speaker 65: doubt seeing a an increase in
04:24:37 Speaker 65: the growth rate that we didn't
04:24:40 Speaker 65: predict, you know, ten or fifteen
04:24:47 Speaker 65: years ago. But I would say
04:24:49 Speaker 65: it's generally accurate. And just to
04:24:52 Speaker 65: the comments about some about using
04:24:55 Speaker 65: Hempson for the past couple growth
04:24:57 Speaker 10: management strategies. When we go out
04:25:00 Speaker 10: for this work, we have been
04:25:02 Speaker 10: going through competitive bidding processes, and
04:25:04 Speaker 10: and there are very few firms
04:25:07 Speaker 10: in in the province that really
04:25:11 Speaker 10: specialize in this. And and and
04:25:15 Speaker 10: as of recent, the the the
04:25:16 Speaker 65: most recent ones that have been
04:25:19 Speaker 65: winning. these projects have been Hempson,
04:25:22 Speaker 65: and and it's aligned in the
04:25:24 Speaker 65: past well with some of the
04:25:26 Speaker 65: development charges background studies that we've
04:25:29 Speaker 65: done, where Hempson was also the
04:25:33 Speaker 65: successful bidder on that. But we
04:25:42 Speaker 65: we we you know we don't
04:25:44 Speaker 65: have a single source relationship. It
04:25:45 Speaker 65: has been a competitive process in
04:25:49 Speaker 65: that regard. Okay, looking around the
04:25:53 Speaker 65: room, not seeing any further hands
04:25:55 Speaker 65: online or in the room. I
04:25:58 Speaker 65: think you have saturated us with
04:26:00 Speaker 65: data and information. Thank you, but
04:26:02 Speaker 65: we know that the next step
04:26:06 Speaker 20: will be further consideration. So thank
04:26:07 Speaker 20: you. All right. So with that,
04:26:10 Speaker 20: I will call the question. All
04:26:14 Speaker 20: those in favor, and that motion
04:26:17 Speaker 39: is carried. Thank you. All right.
04:26:19 Speaker 39: Madam Clerk is going to make
04:26:23 Speaker 39: her way towards the lectern to
04:26:27 Speaker 39: introduce the next one. In the
04:26:30 Speaker 39: meantime, we will get it on
04:26:38 Speaker 39: the floor. It's recommended that. CCRCW
04:26:40 Speaker 39: 1225 regarding committee appointments for 2026
04:26:41 Speaker 39: be received, and that the warden's
04:26:42 Speaker 39: appointment to the Alternative Land Use
04:26:46 Speaker 39: Services, known as ALIS, and the
04:26:47 Speaker 39: Clean Energy Frontier Program be endorsed,
04:26:49 Speaker 39: and that all appointments noted in
04:26:52 Speaker 39: this report be endorsed and elections
04:26:54 Speaker 39: be held where required. Madam Clerk,
04:26:55 Speaker 39: that's still what we're looking. That's
04:26:56 Speaker 39: still the recommendations that you mentioned
04:26:58 Speaker 39: that you're going to have to
04:27:01 Speaker 39: identify if you changes. Okay, all
04:27:04 Speaker 39: right. So may ask for mover
04:27:05 Speaker 39: in a second. Great. So may
04:27:06 Speaker 39: I ask for a mover and
04:27:09 Speaker 39: a seconder? Okay. Moved by Councillor
04:27:09 Speaker 66: Dobrin, seconded by Councillor McQueen. It's
04:27:12 Speaker 66: now on the floor for discussion.
04:27:14 Speaker 66: Welcome, Madam Clerk. Thank you very
04:27:15 Speaker 66: much. This report comes before you
04:27:18 Speaker 66: as our annual committee report to
04:27:21 Speaker 66: the various committees, task forces, and
04:27:24 Speaker 66: subcommittees that we have, requiring county
04:27:26 Speaker 66: councillors to sit on the those
04:27:28 Speaker 66: various bodies. There are no minimum
04:27:30 Speaker 66: or maximum. number of committees that
04:27:32 Speaker 66: any member must sit on, unless
04:27:33 Speaker 66: there's that specifically stated in the
04:27:37 Speaker 66: terms of reference. Council interest on
04:27:41 Speaker 66: the various committees that we're looking
04:27:44 Speaker 66: for appointments for was expressed, and
04:27:46 Speaker 66: those have been included in the
04:27:48 Speaker 67: report as of the date of
04:27:50 Speaker 67: publishing of the agenda. Since then,
04:27:51 Speaker 67: we have received some additional interest
04:27:53 Speaker 67: in in some of the areas
04:27:54 Speaker 67: where there was vacancies showing up.
04:27:57 Speaker 67: So, Brittany has kindly put those
04:27:59 Speaker 67: up on the screen. for you.
04:28:01 Speaker 67: If you don't mind zooming in
04:28:05 Speaker 67: a little bit, sorry, Brittany. Just
04:28:09 Speaker 67: see we can move through those.
04:28:10 Speaker 67: So, Agricultural Advisory Committee. We had
04:28:12 Speaker 67: a need for one more additional
04:28:18 Speaker 67: member. Councilor Mackey has since indicated
04:28:21 Speaker 67: his interest on that one. So,
04:28:25 Speaker 67: absent any changes in that committee
04:28:26 Speaker 67: proposal, that one is full at
04:28:28 Speaker 67: this time. Budget and Finance Committee.
04:28:30 Speaker 67: There were three additional. council members
04:28:33 Speaker 67: that are opportunities available. We've since
04:28:34 Speaker 67: heard from Councillors Mackie and Greg,
04:28:36 Speaker 67: who expressed interest. So there is
04:28:38 Speaker 67: one available spot there if anyone
04:28:40 Speaker 67: wishes to put their name forward.
04:28:44 Speaker 67: We don't need to fill that
04:28:46 Speaker 67: space. It's up to eight members,
04:28:47 Speaker 67: so the terms of reference are
04:28:50 Speaker 67: very broad in that regard. So
04:28:51 Speaker 22: it's fine as it sits there,
04:28:57 Speaker 22: or it's it's able to accommodate
04:28:59 Speaker 22: an additional person. community drug and
04:29:01 Speaker 22: alcohol strategy. There were three interested
04:29:02 Speaker 22: members, where there are only two
04:29:03 Speaker 22: spaces available. So, absent any indication
04:29:06 Speaker 22: from councillors otherwise, then there would
04:29:09 Speaker 22: be an election required there. I
04:29:11 Speaker 22: see Councillor Mackie's hand. Yes, sorry
04:29:12 Speaker 22: to step in. I'll back off
04:29:15 Speaker 67: on the drug and alcohol, and
04:29:17 Speaker 67: I was on it. last couple
04:29:19 Speaker 67: of terms, so if there's
04:29:22 Speaker 67: interest, we'll let some newcomers take
04:29:25 Speaker 67: over. Thanks. Thank you. So with
04:29:27 Speaker 67: that, we do have a full
04:29:28 Speaker 67: committee there on community drug and
04:29:30 Speaker 67: alcohol strategy. Community services committee requires
04:29:32 Speaker 67: the warden and six members, so
04:29:35 Speaker 67: we have seven members who have
04:29:36 Speaker 67: expressed their interest in that committee.
04:29:39 Speaker 67: So there would. be an election
04:29:41 Speaker 67: required there as well. Just having
04:29:43 Speaker 67: one extra body expressing interest on
04:29:45 Speaker 67: county services, and I think the
04:29:48 Speaker 67: only other one was Gray County
04:29:49 Speaker 67: Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee. There is
04:29:52 Speaker 67: one council member space, and we've
04:29:53 Speaker 67: had interest from two members, being
04:29:55 Speaker 67: Councilors Greg and Dobreen. So there
04:29:59 Speaker 67: is, and the rest I believe
04:30:01 Speaker 67: were were full. and as noted
04:30:03 Speaker 67: in the report. Okay, do we
04:30:05 Speaker 67: need to scroll down the list,
04:30:08 Speaker 67: or the rest were all? Yeah.
04:30:10 Speaker 67: Okay, so I'm going to go
04:30:13 Speaker 67: to Councilor Dobrin. Thank you, thank
04:30:14 Speaker 67: you, Warden, and thank you, Tara.
04:30:18 Speaker 67: Since I sent you that email
04:30:20 Speaker 67: suggesting that I would be. willing
04:30:21 Speaker 67: to fill that vacant spot, Councilor
04:30:24 Speaker 67: Greg, who has sat on that
04:30:28 Speaker 67: committee in the past, did speak
04:30:29 Speaker 67: with me, and I am more
04:30:31 Speaker 67: than happy to step out of
04:30:32 Speaker 67: that election so that there's continuity
04:30:35 Speaker 67: in that committee to the end
04:30:38 Speaker 67: of the term. Okay, thank you
04:30:39 Speaker 67: very much. And anything else? And
04:30:43 Speaker 67: on. And online, do we have
04:30:46 Speaker 67: any hands? Okay, we'll go to
04:30:50 Speaker 67: Councillor Greg. While we're okay, there's
04:30:51 Speaker 67: a shake of the head that
04:30:52 Speaker 67: we don't have anybody's hands raised
04:30:54 Speaker 67: online. Councillor Greg, my question is
04:30:55 Speaker 67: to back up to the Community
04:30:57 Speaker 67: Drug and Alcohol Strategy Committee. I'm
04:31:00 Speaker 67: just wondering the relevancy of us
04:31:02 Speaker 68: having members on that when, in
04:31:04 Speaker 68: the last few years, we've seen
04:31:07 Speaker 53: the expand or the introduction and
04:31:13 Speaker 53: the expansion of the community Reduction
04:31:15 Speaker 53: and the expansion of the community
04:31:17 Speaker 53: safety and well-being committee, and that's
04:31:19 Speaker 53: what makes me wonder if if
04:31:21 Speaker 53: maybe we could learn a little
04:31:22 Speaker 53: bit more about the merits of
04:31:24 Speaker 53: of why we're sitting on on
04:31:28 Speaker 53: that committee as well. I can
04:31:30 Speaker 53: see the merit previous to that
04:31:32 Speaker 53: community safety and well-being, but that's
04:31:34 Speaker 67: kind of what the objective and
04:31:37 Speaker 67: what they're they're charged with with
04:31:39 Speaker 67: doing. I I think. Okay, we'll
04:31:41 Speaker 67: go to Director Shaw. Thank you,
04:31:42 Speaker 67: Madam Warden. We have a number
04:31:44 Speaker 67: of community committees that. actually report
04:31:45 Speaker 67: up to the community and and
04:31:47 Speaker 67: safety and well being program. So
04:31:49 Speaker 67: what the community safety and well
04:31:54 Speaker 67: being does is it has it
04:31:56 Speaker 67: helps assist with any so it
04:31:59 Speaker 67: might be something identified in community
04:32:01 Speaker 67: through survey. Here's an area of
04:32:02 Speaker 67: need. Here's a gap. Then it
04:32:06 Speaker 67: would help identify a group such
04:32:08 Speaker 67: as a community drug and alcohol
04:32:10 Speaker 67: in order to fill that gap.
04:32:11 Speaker 67: So that's what it does. It's
04:32:13 Speaker 20: more of a coordinating. body and
04:32:16 Speaker 20: ensuring that the right pieces are
04:32:20 Speaker 20: there and the gaps are filled.
04:32:24 Speaker 20: It doesn't necessarily provide the the
04:32:27 Speaker 20: expertise. We leave that part to
04:32:29 Speaker 20: people like CMHA and others that
04:32:32 Speaker 20: are on the community drug and
04:32:35 Speaker 20: alcohol committee. So it really is
04:32:39 Speaker 20: a coordinating body. Is there is
04:32:41 Speaker 20: there a follow up, Councillor Gray?
04:32:44 Speaker 20: If it was if it was
04:32:49 Speaker 65: more purely a reporting function, then
04:32:51 Speaker 65: I just I would question why
04:32:53 Speaker 65: we would would have two conduits
04:32:54 Speaker 65: back and forth as well as
04:32:55 Speaker 65: the community safety. We wouldn't probably
04:32:56 Speaker 65: profess to be the experts in
04:32:58 Speaker 65: the material, so I just wondered
04:33:03 Speaker 65: if if it's still just a
04:33:04 Speaker 69: reporting function, then I can understand
04:33:07 Speaker 29: it being like a subset of
04:33:12 Speaker 29: the community safety and well being.
04:33:15 Speaker 29: But is it still is it
04:33:17 Speaker 29: reporting or is it something? something
04:33:19 Speaker 29: beyond reporting? It through you, Madam
04:33:22 Speaker 29: Ward. So the community drug and
04:33:25 Speaker 29: alcohol itself does the body of
04:33:28 Speaker 22: the work. So they have a
04:33:30 Speaker 22: group that's come together that has
04:33:32 Speaker 22: identified areas in our community that
04:33:36 Speaker 22: probably need some focus. There is
04:33:38 Speaker 22: a peer advisory committee too. So
04:33:39 Speaker 22: these are people with lived experience
04:33:42 Speaker 22: that would comment on projects going
04:33:47 Speaker 22: forward. We've used the peer committee
04:33:48 Speaker 22: ourselves when looking at some affordable
04:33:50 Speaker 22: housing specific. to transitional housing or
04:33:51 Speaker 22: supportive housing, but what the community?
04:33:55 Speaker 22: So it's not necessarily just a
04:33:57 Speaker 22: reporting body; it's an action group.
04:34:00 Speaker 22: So there are actions that are
04:34:01 Speaker 22: happening. So what happens with the
04:34:02 Speaker 22: community safety and well-being?
04:34:06 Speaker 22: It also has action groups under
04:34:09 Speaker 22: it too, right? So instead of
04:34:11 Speaker 22: duplicating, we work with what's already
04:34:13 Speaker 29: existing in the community. If there
04:34:15 Speaker 29: hadn't been an existing community drug
04:34:18 Speaker 39: and alcohol committee already, then we
04:34:22 Speaker 39: probably would have had to develop.
04:34:24 Speaker 39: one through community safety and well-being
04:34:26 Speaker 39: because that's certainly something that has
04:34:29 Speaker 39: been identified. So, if you look
04:34:31 Speaker 39: at mental health, addictions, poverty, these
04:34:34 Speaker 39: are ones that crime prevention. These
04:34:35 Speaker 39: are groups that these are areas
04:34:37 Speaker 39: that have been identified through community
04:34:42 Speaker 39: safety and well-being surveys that we
04:34:46 Speaker 39: need to focus in. But if
04:34:54 Speaker 39: there's already an existing group, then
04:34:56 Speaker 39: that it's they're just there to
04:34:59 Speaker 39: support that group, and the. safety
04:35:00 Speaker 39: and well-being program also has another
04:35:03 Speaker 39: side to it, where it has
04:35:06 Speaker 39: our star table, in which
04:35:08 Speaker 39: there are elevated risk to certain
04:35:10 Speaker 39: individuals. Then they would pull together
04:35:14 Speaker 39: for wraparound services. So the community
04:35:15 Speaker 39: safety and well-being has a number
04:35:19 Speaker 65: of layers to it. One of
04:35:21 Speaker 65: them being action groups, but we
04:35:22 Speaker 65: didn't want to duplicate services if
04:35:24 Speaker 65: there was already something in the
04:35:28 Speaker 65: community. Okay. Are there any other
04:35:30 Speaker 65: questions? Yes. we'll go to Councillor
04:35:34 Speaker 65: Mackie. Thank you, Madam Ward. I
04:35:36 Speaker 65: just want to follow up on
04:35:38 Speaker 65: what Councillor Greg is saying. I
04:35:40 Speaker 65: have—I was on that committee for
04:35:42 Speaker 65: a number of years, and there
04:35:43 Speaker 65: was a an executive coordinator position.
04:35:47 Speaker 10: Is that position still there, and
04:35:49 Speaker 10: is it being funded? Are we
04:35:53 Speaker 10: still funding through Grey and Bruce
04:35:56 Speaker 10: Counties for that position? Through you,
04:35:58 Speaker 10: Madam Ward. Yes, we are. So.
04:36:02 Speaker 10: there is a full time executive
04:36:04 Speaker 10: executive position. It is funded fifty
04:36:05 Speaker 10: fifty through Grey County, Bruce County.
04:36:07 Speaker 10: It's not quite fifty fifty. It's
04:36:08 Speaker 10: by population. I think it's forty
04:36:10 Speaker 10: seven fifty three. That kind of
04:36:12 Speaker 10: idea. And that person not only
04:36:13 Speaker 10: provides assistance to all of the
04:36:15 Speaker 20: action groups, but it also coordinates
04:36:16 Speaker 20: and initiates all of the star
04:36:18 Speaker 20: table, attends all of the committee
04:36:22 Speaker 20: meetings that are at the provincial
04:36:24 Speaker 20: level to ensure that we're also
04:36:26 Speaker 20: involved at the provincial level. and
04:36:28 Speaker 20: we have a new survey that's
04:36:30 Speaker 20: going to be coming out in
04:36:32 Speaker 20: twenty six two to relook at
04:36:34 Speaker 20: where our areas of need in
04:36:36 Speaker 20: the community are. Okay. Any other
04:36:38 Speaker 20: comments? Looking around the room, you
04:36:41 Speaker 53: know, online, not seeing any. Okay.
04:36:44 Speaker 53: So, Madam Clerk and Madam Deputy
04:36:46 Speaker 53: Clerk, if you could please summarize
04:36:48 Speaker 53: the actions we need to take.
04:36:51 Speaker 53: So, we really, I think there
04:36:53 Speaker 53: are there is still. Do you
04:36:55 Speaker 53: want to just go piece by?
04:37:04 Speaker 53: piece. I will leave it to
04:37:06 Speaker 53: your your process expertise. The floor
04:37:08 Speaker 53: is yours. Thank you. So recognizing
04:37:09 Speaker 53: the comments from Councillor McKay and
04:37:11 Speaker 53: Councillor Dobrine about withdrawing their names
04:37:13 Speaker 53: from the Community Drug and Alcohol
04:37:16 Speaker 53: and the Accessibility Advisory Committee, that
04:37:17 Speaker 53: only leaves the Community Services Committee
04:37:21 Speaker 53: with one extra member, so we
04:37:24 Speaker 70: could. proceed with an election for
04:37:29 Speaker 70: that committee if there are no
04:37:32 Speaker 70: other withdrawals to suggest. Okay, so
04:37:33 Speaker 70: there on the screen is the
04:37:35 Speaker 70: final count of those who are
04:37:37 Speaker 70: interested in being on that. It
04:37:40 Speaker 70: is one too many, so we
04:37:42 Speaker 70: would need to do an election.
04:37:44 Speaker 44: Are there any final comments? Yes,
04:37:46 Speaker 44: Councillor Greg. Well, if I could,
04:37:48 Speaker 44: I'd just like to speak to
04:37:51 Speaker 44: my candidacy. I would take a
04:37:55 Speaker 44: moment to. acknowledge that I think
04:38:00 Speaker 44: I would be an excellent candidate
04:38:01 Speaker 44: for that committee, being that significant
04:38:03 Speaker 44: amount of the community services is
04:38:05 Speaker 44: directed through our municipality in Owen
04:38:07 Speaker 44: Sound, so we are a little
04:38:10 Speaker 44: more so impacted, perhaps, than some
04:38:12 Speaker 44: other municipalities. So I think myself
04:38:14 Speaker 44: sitting on that committee is is
04:38:15 Speaker 44: particularly filling an acute function between
04:38:21 Speaker 20: the. county and the city in
04:38:22 Speaker 20: terms of some of the support
04:38:24 Speaker 20: services that are encapsulated within that
04:38:26 Speaker 20: committee. Okay, so then I will
04:38:27 Speaker 20: then open it to the floor
04:38:32 Speaker 20: for any others whose name is
04:38:35 Speaker 20: on the list for community services
04:38:36 Speaker 20: to make any other comments. I'll
04:38:37 Speaker 20: go to Councillor Dobrin. Thank you.
04:38:39 Speaker 20: I have two questions. It indicates
04:38:41 Speaker 20: that it's in-person meetings, but we
04:38:42 Speaker 20: have been able to participate hybridly,
04:38:43 Speaker 20: especially in. inclement weather. The other
04:38:45 Speaker 20: question that I had was, I've
04:38:47 Speaker 20: been on that committee, and it
04:38:48 Speaker 20: is actually other than being the
04:38:51 Speaker 20: alternate on the Grey Federation of
04:38:56 Speaker 71: Agriculture, which the appointee, Councillor McQueen,
04:38:58 Speaker 71: I don't think has missed a
04:39:00 Speaker 71: meeting. So, I would like to
04:39:02 Speaker 71: remain on that Community Services Committee
04:39:04 Speaker 71: and wonder the value of having
04:39:06 Speaker 71: two representatives from Chatsworth, although they
04:39:09 Speaker 71: both bring that. They both bring
04:39:15 Speaker 71: value to the committee, but do
04:39:15 Speaker 20: we need two representatives from one
04:39:17 Speaker 20: municipality? So, Madam Clerk, is there
04:39:20 Speaker 20: any any reason why we cannot
04:39:21 Speaker 20: have two from one municipality? The
04:39:25 Speaker 20: terms of reference for this particular
04:39:26 Speaker 20: committee currently state that it's the
04:39:28 Speaker 20: ward and six members, so not
04:39:31 Speaker 20: restricted to any one municipality. I
04:39:32 Speaker 20: believe planning and economic development and
04:39:35 Speaker 20: the Planning PDAC Planning Economic Development
04:39:36 Speaker 72: Advisory Committee is the only one
04:39:37 Speaker 72: that requires membership from each municipality,
04:39:41 Speaker 72: but the rest are more flexible
04:39:43 Speaker 72: in that nature. Okay, thank you.
04:39:45 Speaker 72: Are any other comments from any
04:39:46 Speaker 72: of the other members whose name
04:39:48 Speaker 72: is standing? I'll go to Councillor
04:39:51 Speaker 72: McKay. Yes, thank you. I would
04:39:53 Speaker 72: like to stay on the Community
04:39:56 Speaker 72: Service Committee. Forty-one years of being
04:39:59 Speaker 72: healthcare work in the city of
04:40:02 Speaker 72: Mont Saint, the county of Grey.
04:40:06 Speaker 20: I've seen a lot of different
04:40:08 Speaker 20: parts of the community, and I've
04:40:09 Speaker 20: dealt with a lot of the
04:40:11 Speaker 20: services. So, I think this sounds
04:40:13 Speaker 73: kind of like getting into elections
04:40:15 Speaker 73: in twenty twenty-six. But, but I
04:40:18 Speaker 73: think I would be very intelligent
04:40:20 Speaker 73: person to be on this committee.
04:40:25 Speaker 73: So, thank you very much. Thank
04:40:27 Speaker 20: you. Yes, and I am putting
04:40:29 Speaker 20: a call out to any of
04:40:30 Speaker 20: the members who who have offered
04:40:33 Speaker 20: their name as a willing partner,
04:40:35 Speaker 20: a willing member of the committee
04:40:37 Speaker 20: to go ahead and speak their
04:40:39 Speaker 20: comments. So this is the moment
04:40:43 Speaker 74: for us to hear from each
04:40:45 Speaker 65: of the members that wishes to
04:40:47 Speaker 65: speak. I think I saw my
04:40:51 Speaker 65: hand, Councillor Mackey. Your hand is
04:40:52 Speaker 65: up. Thank you, Madam Warden, and
04:40:54 Speaker 65: I agree with Councillor DeGraffenreid
04:40:56 Speaker 65: that we do not need two
04:41:01 Speaker 65: members from. the Township of Chatsworth
04:41:03 Speaker 65: on this committee. However, I have
04:41:05 Speaker 75: served on this committee for a
04:41:08 Speaker 75: number of years, so I'm not
04:41:10 Speaker 75: the new guy to the committee.
04:41:11 Speaker 75: I've worked in social services for
04:41:15 Speaker 75: the the last 42 years and
04:41:18 Speaker 75: have a pretty good knowledge of
04:41:22 Speaker 75: of the system. And I would
04:41:24 Speaker 75: like to continue as a county
04:41:28 Speaker 75: representative on the social service committee.
04:41:35 Speaker 39: And I would appreciate everyone's support
04:41:37 Speaker 39: in my reelection. Thank you. Election.
04:41:40 Speaker 39: Thank you. I'm navigating navigating ward
04:41:41 Speaker 39: waters here as the warden, and
04:41:44 Speaker 39: I don't think even as the
04:41:47 Speaker 39: mayor, I've ever needed to go
04:41:48 Speaker 39: to an election for committee members.
04:41:52 Speaker 39: I'm going to lean carefully into
04:41:56 Speaker 39: the process of the clerk's advice.
04:42:00 Speaker 39: I saw a hand go up
04:42:02 Speaker 39: over here. I think, Councillor Kenner.
04:42:05 Speaker 39: Thank you, Warden Matrasaws, and through
04:42:07 Speaker 39: you. I usually am very magnanimous
04:42:16 Speaker 39: and often step down in favor
04:42:19 Speaker 39: of others. But this is the
04:42:21 Speaker 39: only committee that I serve on.
04:42:25 Speaker 39: I've not missed a meeting. It's
04:42:26 Speaker 39: been a very bit of a
04:42:29 Speaker 39: learning curve, but it's been very
04:42:32 Speaker 39: rewarding as well, and I've enjoyed
04:42:33 Speaker 39: serving on it. And I, if
04:42:35 Speaker 39: I am elected, I will do
04:42:38 Speaker 39: my very best to represent Owens'
04:42:39 Speaker 39: interests and Leefridge's. Town's interests and
04:42:42 Speaker 39: Leeford's and everyone on County Council.
04:42:44 Speaker 39: Thank you. Thank you. Are there
04:42:45 Speaker 39: any other members who whose name
04:42:50 Speaker 39: is being offered to the list
04:42:53 Speaker 39: that wish to speak? Yeah. In
04:42:58 Speaker 39: the meantime, I'll go to Madam
04:43:00 Speaker 39: Clerk. At risk of speaking for
04:43:02 Speaker 39: Councillor Nielsen, he's just online, and
04:43:04 Speaker 39: you just can check in with
04:43:06 Speaker 39: him to see if he has
04:43:08 Speaker 39: any comments. Okay. Yes, I have
04:43:12 Speaker 39: been watching for hands. There. okay,
04:43:13 Speaker 39: there. The virtual hands gone up
04:43:17 Speaker 39: and down. So, Councillor Nielsen, would
04:43:19 Speaker 20: you like to say something? I
04:43:21 Speaker 20: I wasn't planning campaigning here today.
04:43:23 Speaker 20: I enjoy the community services, and
04:43:25 Speaker 20: I've been open and honest that
04:43:26 Speaker 20: the whole reason I ran for
04:43:28 Speaker 20: county council was to be part
04:43:32 Speaker 20: of community services. I've been the
04:43:36 Speaker 20: chair for the last three years.
04:43:40 Speaker 20: I would love to continue to
04:43:41 Speaker 20: be the chair and continue to
04:43:43 Speaker 20: be on this committee. And I
04:43:44 Speaker 20: won't I won't say any more.
04:43:46 Speaker 20: I'm I'm enjoying hearing everybody. plead
04:43:47 Speaker 20: their case. I can just say,
04:43:50 Speaker 20: isn't it wonderful that something such
04:43:53 Speaker 20: as community services is a hot
04:43:54 Speaker 20: spot that everybody wants to sit
04:43:55 Speaker 20: on? I think that's excellent news.
04:43:58 Speaker 20: It demonstrates the commitment that that
04:44:03 Speaker 20: is around this horseshoe. Councillor Dicker,
04:44:04 Speaker 20: would you like to say anything?
04:44:05 Speaker 20: I guess I'd be the odd
04:44:09 Speaker 20: guy out if I didn't say
04:44:13 Speaker 20: something. But I, as well, I.
04:44:17 Speaker 20: I really do enjoy that committee.
04:44:19 Speaker 20: It's very educational. It. I have
04:44:21 Speaker 20: served as vice chair on that
04:44:23 Speaker 20: committee for the last three years,
04:44:24 Speaker 20: I guess, and I, I
04:44:28 Speaker 20: too would like to stay on
04:44:32 Speaker 05: there. So whatever the wishes of
04:44:36 Speaker 05: the horseshoe here are, that was
04:44:38 Speaker 05: I would do what we look
04:44:40 Speaker 05: with. But I would appreciate staying
04:44:42 Speaker 05: on as well. Okay, thank you.
04:44:43 Speaker 05: And so we've heard from all
04:44:45 Speaker 05: the members whose names have
04:44:49 Speaker 05: been put forth. I'll go to
04:44:53 Speaker 05: Councillor Patterson. who has raised her
04:44:54 Speaker 20: hand. Thank you, Madam Warden. I'm
04:44:56 Speaker 20: wondering if County Council would consider
04:44:58 Speaker 20: expanding the committee by one, since
04:44:59 Speaker 20: we have such good representatives for
04:45:00 Speaker 20: this committee. Make it easier on
04:45:01 Speaker 20: us on the vote. So, Madam
04:45:03 Speaker 20: Clerk, what is the the parameter
04:45:06 Speaker 20: that we can operate in in
04:45:11 Speaker 20: terms of expanding? Can we do
04:45:13 Speaker 20: a motion before this motion to
04:45:15 Speaker 20: add? It doesn't. It doesn't tip
04:45:17 Speaker 20: quorum. so so I'll just let
04:45:19 Speaker 20: you answer for the benefit of
04:45:21 Speaker 20: anyone following. Thank you. So, if
04:45:23 Speaker 20: if council wishes to add an
04:45:26 Speaker 20: additional member to the committee, the
04:45:28 Speaker 65: terms of reference on this one
04:45:32 Speaker 65: are very specific, so it would
04:45:34 Speaker 65: require a motion to amend the
04:45:36 Speaker 65: terms of reference to add one
04:45:37 Speaker 65: additional member, and that could be
04:45:39 Speaker 65: done here today if you wish.
04:45:41 Speaker 65: You've heard it from the clerk.
04:45:44 Speaker 65: From the quirk. So, what is
04:45:45 Speaker 65: the will of the committee? The
04:45:50 Speaker 65: whole proceed to election, or is
04:45:52 Speaker 65: there somebody who is going to
04:45:54 Speaker 65: move the composition motion regarding the
04:45:56 Speaker 65: composition, Councillor Debray? I'm quite prepared.
04:45:59 Speaker 65: If I'm not selected to be
04:46:01 Speaker 65: on this committee, I I wave
04:46:04 Speaker 65: to Council. I don't think that
04:46:07 Speaker 65: in a difficult budget year that
04:46:08 Speaker 20: we should be adding more members
04:46:09 Speaker 20: to a committee because we're afraid.
04:46:10 Speaker 20: to step down, but as a
04:46:13 Speaker 20: member of the Township of Southgate,
04:46:14 Speaker 20: that is experiencing or has experienced
04:46:16 Speaker 20: significant growth and in migration from
04:46:18 Speaker 20: our GTA partners, experiencing the the
04:46:20 Speaker 20: loss of a of a county
04:46:25 Speaker 20: housing project because of Grand River
04:46:27 Speaker 20: Conservation Authority. I feel I bring
04:46:30 Speaker 20: value to this community. I feel
04:46:31 Speaker 20: I bring value to this committee,
04:46:33 Speaker 20: so that's my election pitch. I
04:46:35 Speaker 20: I will propose that we go
04:46:36 Speaker 20: to an election and let the
04:46:37 Speaker 20: chips fall where they may. Okay,
04:46:40 Speaker 53: we'll go to Councillor Kuntner. Thank
04:46:42 Speaker 53: you, Warden. I'm very impressed with
04:46:43 Speaker 53: the dedication of everyone and their
04:46:46 Speaker 53: their interest in it. I'm a
04:46:48 Speaker 53: very busy mayor, and so I
04:46:49 Speaker 53: will withdraw. Okay, thank you very
04:46:51 Speaker 53: much, Councillor Kentner, and I do
04:46:54 Speaker 53: see Councillor McQueen's hand up on
04:46:56 Speaker 53: the virtual line. Yeah, thank you,
04:46:58 Speaker 53: Madam Ward. I was going to
04:47:01 Speaker 53: move, if or second the idea
04:47:03 Speaker 53: that Sue Patterson had with regards
04:47:06 Speaker 53: to increasing one. If if we
04:47:11 Speaker 53: have this great interest, and I
04:47:14 Speaker 53: understand that Mayor Beefe has made
04:47:17 Speaker 53: that comment. but I think he's
04:47:19 Speaker 53: very passionate about being on here.
04:47:21 Speaker 20: If Councillor Patterson was going to
04:47:23 Speaker 20: move that motion, I would second
04:47:25 Speaker 20: it. So, Councillor Patterson, are you
04:47:27 Speaker 20: moving that motion? Yes, I will
04:47:29 Speaker 20: move that motion. Okay. So, so
04:47:31 Speaker 20: I didn't hear a motion, but
04:47:33 Speaker 20: I did hear Councillor Patterson float
04:47:36 Speaker 20: that she was interested in in
04:47:38 Speaker 32: moving that motion, and I've heard
04:47:40 Speaker 32: that there is a willing. seconder,
04:47:42 Speaker 32: so Councillor Patterson is moving that
04:47:44 Speaker 32: the terms of reference of the
04:47:46 Speaker 32: committee of the Community Services Committee
04:47:47 Speaker 32: be updated. It's been moved by
04:47:48 Speaker 32: Councillor Patterson and seconded by Councillor
04:47:50 Speaker 32: McQueen, so it's now on the
04:47:52 Speaker 32: floor for discussion. In the meantime,
04:47:55 Speaker 32: we've heard from Councillor Kenner, who
04:47:57 Speaker 32: has offered to withdraw his name
04:47:59 Speaker 32: for this particular term cycle. We'll
04:48:01 Speaker 32: go to Councillor Alternate Councillor Hutchinson.
04:48:03 Speaker 32: Yes, appreciate the the conversation, and
04:48:06 Speaker 32: it sounds like there's a lot
04:48:10 Speaker 32: of interest. I'm almost wondering if
04:48:11 Speaker 32: if it should if they're going
04:48:13 Speaker 32: to review the terms of reference
04:48:15 Speaker 32: that you should look at making
04:48:19 Speaker 32: this one represented from each municipality,
04:48:21 Speaker 32: since all municipalities are affected by
04:48:23 Speaker 32: these services. So just something to
04:48:25 Speaker 32: keep in mind if they are
04:48:29 Speaker 32: going to look at reviewing the
04:48:30 Speaker 20: terms. So thank you. Okay, so
04:48:37 Speaker 20: that, Madam Clerk, would have to
04:48:41 Speaker 20: be an amendment. to the main
04:48:42 Speaker 20: motion that's on the floor right
04:48:43 Speaker 20: now. I apologize; I was distracted,
04:48:45 Speaker 20: distracting myself with a clarification on
04:48:47 Speaker 20: the potential vacancy that we now
04:48:49 Speaker 20: have while we're increasing to an
04:48:52 Speaker 20: additional member. So I was just
04:48:54 Speaker 20: getting clarification from Councillor Kenner. Could
04:48:55 Speaker 20: you repeat the question? Alternate Councillor
04:48:57 Speaker 20: Hutchinson asked if if if if
04:48:59 Speaker 20: it were to. be since we're
04:49:03 Speaker 65: discussing a motion to expand the
04:49:05 Speaker 65: number of of people sitting on
04:49:06 Speaker 65: it, the question that he had
04:49:09 Speaker 65: is, what about making it one
04:49:11 Speaker 65: from each of the nine municipalities,
04:49:12 Speaker 65: like the economic development, the economic
04:49:13 Speaker 65: development committee? That was his question.
04:49:15 Speaker 65: I'll let you speak. I asked
04:49:18 Speaker 65: then to me that that sounds
04:49:21 Speaker 65: too substantial to what we've just
04:49:23 Speaker 65: said. That would have to be
04:49:27 Speaker 65: an amendment to the motion that's
04:49:28 Speaker 65: on the floor right now from.
04:49:29 Speaker 20: Councilor Patterson and Councilor McLean. Do
04:49:31 Speaker 20: you concur, or am I losing
04:49:33 Speaker 20: my path? I do agree with
04:49:43 Speaker 20: that, and and what I could
04:49:46 Speaker 20: suggest is that towards the end
04:49:47 Speaker 20: of each council term, the clerks
04:49:51 Speaker 20: department does a review with senior
04:49:53 Speaker 20: staff at the Grey County, and
04:49:54 Speaker 20: we look at the committee structure,
04:49:55 Speaker 20: what committees we think we will
04:49:59 Speaker 20: need going forward, what ones are
04:50:02 Speaker 25: have become redundant or met their
04:50:04 Speaker 25: their their goals. So there is
04:50:05 Speaker 29: a report coming forward in 2026
04:50:06 Speaker 29: that will look at all of
04:50:09 Speaker 29: that, and we'll look for council's
04:50:10 Speaker 29: feedback on along with the staff
04:50:18 Speaker 29: recommendation on what those committees could
04:50:19 Speaker 29: look like for the next term
04:50:21 Speaker 29: of council. Okay. So and this,
04:50:23 Speaker 29: of course, being an advisory committee
04:50:27 Speaker 29: that simply makes its recommendations to
04:50:31 Speaker 29: the full council, who participates in
04:50:33 Speaker 29: actual decision making on whichever topic.
04:50:35 Speaker 29: so Councillor Hutchinson, are you moving
04:50:36 Speaker 29: that motion, the amendment to the
04:50:37 Speaker 29: main motion? No, I'll I'll leave
04:50:38 Speaker 29: it at this time. It sounds
04:50:41 Speaker 29: like they're going to review it,
04:50:43 Speaker 29: so just something to keep in
04:50:45 Speaker 29: mind in the future. Okay, thank
04:50:47 Speaker 29: you. So we are still with
04:50:49 Speaker 29: the motion from Councillor Patterson and
04:50:56 Speaker 29: Councillor McQueen to add one more
04:50:59 Speaker 29: position on the committee. I'll go
04:51:01 Speaker 29: to Councillor Mackie. Mr. Mayor, I
04:51:02 Speaker 29: would encourage Councillor Cantley to. Councillor
04:51:06 Speaker 29: Kentler to leave his name in
04:51:08 Speaker 29: the hat, and we're all big
04:51:10 Speaker 29: people around here, and we've all
04:51:12 Speaker 29: been through elections, and most have
04:51:14 Speaker 29: won and lost. And I think
04:51:16 Speaker 76: we should have an election. I
04:51:19 Speaker 76: don't think we need to add
04:51:21 Speaker 76: an additional position every time we're
04:51:23 Speaker 76: faced with an election. We did
04:51:24 Speaker 76: that with the Budget and Finance
04:51:26 Speaker 76: Committee, and which is fine, but
04:51:27 Speaker 65: I don't think that's necessary just
04:51:29 Speaker 65: because we've got got a lot
04:51:30 Speaker 65: of interested parties, all very good
04:51:32 Speaker 65: candidates, and the committee will be
04:51:33 Speaker 65: well served. regardless of who we
04:51:36 Speaker 65: select. So, I think we should
04:51:37 Speaker 65: just carry on. Okay. Thank you.
04:51:39 Speaker 20: Any other comments on this this
04:51:41 Speaker 20: motion to add an extra position?
04:51:43 Speaker 20: Okay. Oh, was that a hand,
04:51:44 Speaker 20: Councillor McQueen? Yes. Go ahead. Just
04:51:46 Speaker 20: following up with with you, Madam
04:51:50 Speaker 20: Warden. The comments that been made.
04:51:51 Speaker 20: I think it's when you have
04:51:53 Speaker 20: an election and and and In
04:51:55 Speaker 20: in in by a simple by
04:51:57 Speaker 20: this simple motion that's there, this
04:51:59 Speaker 20: allows everybody who has strong interest
04:52:01 Speaker 20: to be on this for this
04:52:06 Speaker 20: particular year. I worry about when
04:52:08 Speaker 20: you have an election and somebody
04:52:09 Speaker 20: ends up not successful. We have
04:52:14 Speaker 20: a lot. We have all great
04:52:16 Speaker 20: candidates here, and I would just
04:52:18 Speaker 20: prefer us to call the question
04:52:20 Speaker 20: and see if that does carry,
04:52:23 Speaker 20: and then we move from there.
04:52:25 Speaker 20: If it doesn't, then I guess
04:52:26 Speaker 20: the default would be election. But
04:52:29 Speaker 20: I just I you know I
04:52:33 Speaker 77: know that. as the member said,
04:52:35 Speaker 77: we we're big people here. But
04:52:37 Speaker 77: for one person to add to
04:53:34 Speaker 77: this, I think it's a simple
04:53:37 Speaker 77: matter of of just adding that
04:53:38 Speaker 77: for this year. Thank you. So
04:53:41 Speaker 77: call the question, I guess. Okay,
04:53:44 Speaker 77: thank you. Well, I don't see
04:53:46 Speaker 77: any further hands up. And oh
04:53:49 Speaker 29: wait, we we've got Councillor Carleton.
04:53:52 Speaker 29: Go ahead, Councillor Carleton. Thank you.
04:53:56 Speaker 29: If we're concerned about the added
04:53:58 Speaker 78: person on that committee, budget and
04:53:59 Speaker 78: finance is running short, so we're
04:54:01 Speaker 78: just moving one to the other.
04:54:03 Speaker 78: So it all comes out in
04:54:07 Speaker 78: the wash. Yes, Madam Clerk. So
04:54:12 Speaker 78: just for confirmation, so we're all
04:54:17 Speaker 78: operating from the same page. Right
04:54:19 Speaker 20: now, there's the motion for to
04:54:21 Speaker 20: increase by one member to a
04:54:23 Speaker 20: total of seven plus the warden.
04:54:25 Speaker 20: But we have had a withdrawal
04:54:26 Speaker 20: as. well, so there will not.
04:54:28 Speaker 20: If if this goes through, we
04:54:30 Speaker 20: won't have. There won't be an
04:54:32 Speaker 20: election either either way. We we
04:54:34 Speaker 20: will still be looking for a
04:54:35 Speaker 20: member if this motion does pass,
04:54:37 Speaker 20: because Councillor Kenner has withdrawn his
04:54:38 Speaker 20: name unless he would like to
04:54:39 Speaker 20: re-add it back in. Yes, I
04:54:41 Speaker 20: think we have to not get
04:54:43 Speaker 20: too far ahead of ourselves. We
04:54:44 Speaker 79: have to entertain this motion. Then,
04:54:48 Speaker 79: when we know how many positions
04:54:49 Speaker 79: there are, then I will give
04:54:52 Speaker 79: the privilege. And I will give
04:54:54 Speaker 79: the privilege to Councillor Kentner to
04:54:56 Speaker 79: voice whether or not he is
04:54:59 Speaker 79: interested. Should this create a vacancy?
04:55:00 Speaker 79: Okay, so I don't see any
04:55:02 Speaker 79: further hands up. Then I will
04:55:03 Speaker 79: ask. Then all those in favor
04:55:07 Speaker 29: of adding the extra position to
04:55:08 Speaker 29: the Community Services Committee, and I
04:55:10 Speaker 29: see five. Yeah, so that motion
04:55:14 Speaker 29: fails. So. we are still at
04:55:17 Speaker 29: the same number of positions. And
04:55:19 Speaker 29: Councillor Kentner, just because we've just
04:55:23 Speaker 29: had that motion, I'll just confirm
04:55:25 Speaker 29: with you that are you still
04:55:26 Speaker 29: willing to withdraw your name? Yes,
04:55:30 Speaker 29: I am. Thank you. Thank you.
04:55:31 Speaker 29: Okay, so then, Madam Clerk, that
04:55:34 Speaker 29: means that we will not have
04:55:36 Speaker 29: to have an election. We have
04:55:38 Speaker 29: now filled all of the available
04:55:39 Speaker 29: positions. Director Shaw, don't you feel
04:55:41 Speaker 29: good about being so popular? So
04:55:43 Speaker 29: again, it's a wonderful testimony to
04:55:45 Speaker 29: all of those, everyone around the
04:55:48 Speaker 29: table that cares about this topic
04:55:53 Speaker 29: and who are duly electing their
04:55:57 Speaker 29: colleagues to to get get through
04:55:59 Speaker 29: the the the the details of
04:56:00 Speaker 29: the items that come across that
04:56:02 Speaker 29: table and be able to present
04:56:03 Speaker 29: them to all of us so
04:56:05 Speaker 80: that we can all buy in
04:56:08 Speaker 80: and all make those decisions together.
04:56:11 Speaker 80: So it is wonderful to see such enthusiasm for all. of the participation of the committees. I appreciate that. So, with that, then, Madam Clerk, do you have any other business that you need? Just to, there's the motion on the floor. So perhaps voting on that, and then to make the appointments official. Just a main motion to appoint the extra, the additional members that have not been outlined in the report. It does. help us for auditing and record keeping that we we go through that actual formal process. Okay, so you want us to call the the question that is currently on the floor moved and seconded, and then we'll do an additional motion to identify the names that were added because they're not in the report. If somebody looked at this years from now, they'd need to see the continuity of all the names. Okay, so with that, then the original motion was moved and seconded. We are back to accepting what's in the report. We will then add the additional names with an additional motion. So on this motion that is currently on the floor, all those in favor, and that is passed. And then we will need a second motion then to accept the additional names that fill the vacancies that were described in the report. That's moved by Councillor Mackey, seconded by Councillor Eccles. Any dis? Any discussion, Councillor Mackey? Thank you, Warren. On the Budget and Finance Committee, did we not establish that we wanted a representative from each municipality? So we would, was that not the reason we extended it an additional member so that that each municipality would have representation? I thought that was the purpose of expanding the membership. When if that's the case, I believe Southgate is the municipality that's missing from that committee. I do recall the discussion, but Madam Clerk, I thought we didn't. Madam Clerk, I thought we didn't—that didn't actually pass. Okay. Which is reviewing the terms of reference. We and I, I can't remember what the specific motions were that were considered, but the terms of reference that were adopted had the warden plus up to eight members, and there's no specific mention of representation from each municipality. Okay, so thank you for raising that clarification. So it is possible for there to be one from each municipality, but it is not required as in comparison to the economic development. Okay, and there remains one vacancy. Okay, all right. Well, I'm not seeing anything further, so we need to pass the motion about the additional names. Oh wait, oh, I'll go to Councillor McQueen. I'm going to need a mover and a seconder for the additional names. Councillor McQueen, go ahead. Yeah, I'm just wondering—is back when. Wondering is back when that terms of reference was changed. Possibly the deputy warden was the warden, and that may be how they had the Southgate representative at that time. I'm not sure the timing or the date of that, but anyway, that's just a comment. And I will move if you need a mover. I will make a. I will move. Thank you. I really do need a mover. Thank you. Moved by Councillor McQueen that the additional names that have offered to serve to fill the vacancies that that were identified in the. Their names to be added. We will need a second or seconded by Councillor Carleton. So it's now on the floor for discussion. Any discussion about the extra names to be added, the vacancies? Okay. In that case, all in favor, and that motion is carried. Thank goodness. Okay. All right. Thank you very much, Madam Clerk. We do not have any closed session matters. And is there any other business? Seeing no hands raised, are there any notices of motion to serve, Deputy Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden. I will be working with the Clerks Department to bring a motion to the next Council meeting that on that will reflect that on the adoption of the 2026 budget, the Budget and Finance Committee be dissolved. Thank you. Any other notices of motion? Not seeing. Not seen any. Okay, then in that case, then I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Councillor Pringle, I missed your hand the last time. I'll take you as moving, and Councillor McKay as seconding. Any discussion? All those in favor? And that is carried. Thank you.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.