Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — August 13, 2026
Hook: Rockwood Terrace Redevelopment Progress
Grey County · County Council · August 13, 2026
Summary
The County Council opened proceedings on August 13, 2026, reviewing previous committee minutes before turning to significant updates regarding local long-term care redevelopment and new by-laws. Officials debated repurposing an aging site while unanimously approving measures to facilitate infrastructure borrowing and wildlife management.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Long Term Care Committee of Management minutes dated July 16, 2026: The Long Term Care Committee reviewed operational reports and evaluated scenarios for repurposing an aging site through leasing, sale, or redevelopment into senior housing. Council debated funding a $30,000 study to assess renovating Rockwood Terrace for alternative standard beds while approving additional resources to investigate new renovation funding opportunities.
- Council Strikes Colliers Extension and Debates Rockwood Terrace Renovation: Council debated funding a 30,000 dollar study to assess renovating Rockwood Terrace for alternative standard beds, while an amendment successfully removed the clause extending Colliers' scope of work.
- Long Term Care Redevelopment Task Force minutes dated July 16, 2026: The Council adopted resolutions regarding the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment update for informational purposes. A correction was noted in the minutes to reflect accurate attendance records before discussion commenced.
- By-laws: Council considered six specific bylaws addressing infrastructure financing, land easements for the CP Rail Trail, medical programme agreements, and wildlife control measures. The assembly approved legislation to authorise borrowing from Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, grant easements on the Eco Parkway, amend a memorandum of understanding with Rural Ontario Medical Programme, remove nuisance beavers, and control coyotes or wolves.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- County Council
- Date
- August 13, 2026
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
Council members Stephanie Patterson and Paul McQueen called to order the August 13, 2026 meeting.
00:08:02 Speaker 01: I would now like to call
00:08:03 Speaker 01: to order this Council meeting of
00:08:04 Speaker 02: August thirteenth. twenty twenty six. As
00:08:08 Speaker 02: you are able, please join us
00:08:09 Speaker 02: in the standing up for and
2 O Canada
Council members sang O Canada while conducting a roll call that confirmed attendance for all present members except Councillors Body, Bordignon, and Carlton.
00:08:11 Speaker 02: singing of "O Canada." O Canada,
00:08:30 Speaker 02: our home and native land. true
00:08:37 Speaker 03: patriot love in all of us
00:08:43 Speaker 04: command. With glowing hearts, we see
00:08:47 Speaker 04: thee rise, the true North, strong
00:08:50 Speaker 04: and free. From far and wide,
00:08:55 Speaker 04: O Canada, we stand on guard
00:08:59 Speaker 05: for thee, guard. God keep our
00:09:06 Speaker 05: land glorious and free, O Canada!
00:09:14 Speaker 05: We stand on guard for thee,
00:09:21 Speaker 05: O Canada! We stand on guard
00:09:26 Speaker 05: for thee. Thank you, Madam Clerk.
00:09:36 Speaker 05: Could you please conduct our roll
00:09:40 Speaker 05: call? Councillor Mackie. Councillor McKay.
00:09:44 Speaker 05: Councillor Carlton sends her regrets today.
00:09:46 Speaker 06: Councillor Pringle. Councillor McQueen. Councillor
00:09:51 Speaker 06: Nielsen. Councillor Patterson. Councillor
00:09:54 Speaker 06: Dicker. Councillor Kentner. Councillor Keaveny.
00:09:58 Speaker 06: Councillor Body sends his regrets. today.
00:10:00 Speaker 06: Alternate Councillor Kepky, Councillor Greg,
00:10:05 Speaker 06: Councillor Milne, Councillor Debrine, Warden
00:10:09 Speaker 06: Matrasovs, Councillor Bordignon also sends his
00:10:12 Speaker 06: regrets today. Councillor Eccles, Councillor Hutchinson.
00:10:17 Speaker 06: So we have all members in
00:10:18 Speaker 06: attendance today, with the exception of
00:10:19 Speaker 06: Councillors Body, Bordignon, and Carlton. Thank
4 Land Acknowledgement
Council members Scott Mackey and Paul McQueen respectfully acknowledge gathering on the traditional territory of the Anishinabek Nation and the Six Nations of the Grand River Haudenosaunee, expressing dedication to honouring Indigenous history while proceeding to adopt the minutes.
00:10:26 Speaker 06: you. Let us begin by respectfully.
00:10:29 Speaker 06: acknowledging that we are gathering on
00:10:30 Speaker 02: the traditional territory of the Anishinabek
00:10:34 Speaker 02: Nation, the people known as the
00:10:35 Speaker 02: Three Fires, as the Ojibwe, Odawa,
00:10:38 Speaker 02: and Potawatomi nations, and further, we
00:10:42 Speaker 02: give thanks to the Chippewas of
00:10:44 Speaker 02: Saugeen and the Chippewas of Nawash,
00:10:46 Speaker 02: known collectively as the Saugeen Ojibwe
00:10:49 Speaker 02: Nation, the traditional keepers of these
00:10:52 Speaker 02: lands and waters since time immemorial.
00:10:55 Speaker 02: In our south lies the traditional
00:10:58 Speaker 02: territories of the Six Nations of
00:10:59 Speaker 02: the Grand River Haudenosaunee. We are
00:11:03 Speaker 02: dedicated to honouring Indigenous history and
00:11:06 Speaker 02: culture, and committed to moving forward
00:11:09 Speaker 02: in the spirit of truth, reconciliation,
00:11:13 Speaker 02: friendship, and collabouration with all First
00:11:16 Speaker 02: Nations, Métis, and Inuit people. At
00:11:24 Speaker 02: this time in our council. agenda,
00:11:26 Speaker 02: we will look at the adoption
5.a County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated July 23, 2026
Council adopted minutes from the July 23, 2026 meeting as presented.
00:11:27 Speaker 02: of the minutes. Item five a:
00:11:29 Speaker 02: It's recommended that the minutes of
00:11:30 Speaker 02: the county council meeting and the
00:11:32 Speaker 02: committee, the whole meeting dated July
00:11:34 Speaker 02: twenty third, twenty twenty six, and
00:11:36 Speaker 02: the resolutions contained therein be adopted
00:11:39 Speaker 02: as presented. May ask for a
00:11:40 Speaker 02: mover and a seconder. Moved by
00:11:42 Speaker 02: Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Nielsen.
00:11:44 Speaker 02: It's on the floor for any
00:11:47 Speaker 02: discussion. All those in favour? And
5.b Closed Committee of the Whole meeting minutes dated July 23, 2026 and Long Term Care Committee of Management minutes dated July 16, 2026
Council adopted the closed session committee of the whole and long term care committee of management minutes from July 23 and July 16, 2026.
00:11:49 Speaker 02: that motion is carried. Item five
00:11:53 Speaker 02: b: Is recommended that the closed
00:11:55 Speaker 02: session committee of the whole meeting
00:11:56 Speaker 02: minutes dated July twenty third, twenty
00:11:58 Speaker 02: twenty six, and the closed session
00:12:00 Speaker 02: long term care committee of management
00:12:03 Speaker 02: meeting minutes dated July sixteenth, twenty
00:12:07 Speaker 02: twenty six, be adopted as provided.
00:12:08 Speaker 02: May I ask for a mover
00:12:10 Speaker 02: and a seconder? Moved by Councillor
00:12:12 Speaker 02: Kieveny, seconded by Councillor Dobrine. Any
00:12:15 Speaker 02: discussion? All those in favour? That
5.c Long Term Care Committee of Management minutes dated July 16, 2026
The Long Term Care Committee reviewed operational reports and evaluated scenarios for repurposing an aging site through leasing, sale, or redevelopment into senior housing. Council debated funding a $30,000 study to assess renovating Rockwood Terrace for alternative standard beds while approving additional resources to investigate new renovation funding opportunities.
00:12:22 Speaker 02: motion is carried. Okay. and next
00:12:24 Speaker 02: we'll look at item five C,
00:12:27 Speaker 02: and there are a number of
00:12:28 Speaker 02: items that have been duly published
00:12:30 Speaker 02: and circulated in the agenda. So
00:12:32 Speaker 02: it is recommended that the Long
00:12:33 Speaker 02: Term Care Committee of Management meeting
00:12:37 Speaker 02: minutes dated July sixteenth, twenty twenty
00:12:39 Speaker 02: six, be adopted as presented, and
00:12:41 Speaker 02: that the following resolutions contained therein
00:12:45 Speaker 02: be endorsed. And within it is
00:12:49 Speaker 02: the report LTCCRCM sixteen twenty six
00:12:51 Speaker 02: to be. 26 to be received
00:12:53 Speaker 02: with the following bullet points that
00:12:58 Speaker 02: have been circulated, and that the
00:13:02 Speaker 02: LTCRC LTCRCM 1226 regarding a long
00:13:05 Speaker 02: term care director update be provided
00:13:08 Speaker 02: for received for information that the
00:13:12 Speaker 02: report LTCRCM 1326 regarding the long
00:13:15 Speaker 02: term care operational report dated April
00:13:19 Speaker 02: 15th to June 14th 2026 be
00:13:22 Speaker 02: received, and that the report LTCRCM
00:13:24 Speaker 02: fourteen twenty six regarding Gray Gables
00:13:26 Speaker 02: fire panel and system replacement be
00:13:27 Speaker 02: received, and that the staff be
00:13:29 Speaker 02: directed to proceed with a single
00:13:32 Speaker 02: source purchase with Troy Life and
00:13:34 Speaker 02: Fire Safety Limited for the fire
00:13:36 Speaker 02: panel and system replacement in the
00:13:37 Speaker 02: amount of one hundred and twenty
00:13:39 Speaker 02: two thousand one hundred and seventy
00:13:41 Speaker 02: three dollars and twenty four cents,
00:13:43 Speaker 02: which excludes HST, in accordance with
00:13:45 Speaker 02: section four point seven of the
00:13:48 Speaker 02: purchasing policy and bylaw five two
00:13:50 Speaker 02: zero nine. twenty four, and finally
00:13:53 Speaker 02: there was a report LTCRCM fifteen
00:13:56 Speaker 02: twenty six regarding Lee Manor Building
00:13:59 Speaker 02: Automation System Replacement that it be
00:14:02 Speaker 02: received and that it is noted
00:14:05 Speaker 02: that the Building Automation Replacement be
00:14:06 Speaker 02: awarded to Empire Controls at a
00:14:08 Speaker 02: cost of two hundred and forty
00:14:10 Speaker 02: five thousand three hundred thirty seven
00:14:12 Speaker 02: dollars and seventy one cents excluding
00:14:15 Speaker 02: HST, and that the shortfall be
00:14:18 Speaker 02: funded by reallocating the approved. 2026
00:14:21 Speaker 02: capital budget of 109,700 for hot
00:14:23 Speaker 02: water recirculating system to this project,
00:14:24 Speaker 02: may I ask for a mover
00:14:27 Speaker 02: and a seconder, please? Before I
00:14:28 Speaker 02: look to staff to come and
00:14:30 Speaker 02: make a few comments, move by
00:14:32 Speaker 02: Councillor Gray, second by Councillor Dicker.
00:14:36 Speaker 02: It's now. Oh, sorry, Councillor Gray,
00:14:40 Speaker 02: you're not moving. I would like
00:14:44 Speaker 07: to vote on the first report,
00:14:46 Speaker 07: CM 1626. Twenty-six separately than the
00:14:50 Speaker 07: rest of the minutes, Madam Warden.
00:14:52 Speaker 08: Okay, so Councillor Greg, are you
00:14:55 Speaker 08: moving, but then asking that it
00:14:58 Speaker 08: be split? Okay, so just just
00:15:00 Speaker 08: before I return to Councillor Dicker,
00:15:11 Speaker 08: Madam Clerk, there's a request to
00:15:13 Speaker 08: split. Okay. Okay. So what we
00:15:14 Speaker 08: can do since we haven't actually.
00:15:15 Speaker 08: officially had it on the floor,
00:15:17 Speaker 08: since there was not yet a
00:15:19 Speaker 08: mover with a seconder, we can
00:15:21 Speaker 08: actually look at that first report.
00:15:23 Speaker 08: Second, we can actually separate it
00:15:25 Speaker 08: without having to move to call
00:15:28 Speaker 08: for a separation. So, on this
00:15:32 Speaker 08: first one, then the oh, sorry,
00:15:33 Speaker 08: Councillor McQueen. Sorry, point of order.
00:15:34 Speaker 08: That wasn't the case last meeting
00:15:37 Speaker 08: when I wanted a separate bylaw
00:15:38 Speaker 08: pulled. I had we had to
00:15:41 Speaker 09: have a separate motion to pull
00:15:43 Speaker 09: that separate bylaw, separate the. question,
00:15:44 Speaker 09: so I don't know why we're
00:15:51 Speaker 09: doing it different today than was
00:15:53 Speaker 09: different then. So the clerk has
00:15:54 Speaker 09: confirmed that in that particular case,
00:15:55 Speaker 09: it was already on the floor
00:15:58 Speaker 09: and therefore needed to be split.
00:16:00 Speaker 09: So it's just a procedural chicken
00:16:01 Speaker 02: or egg before. So we can
00:16:02 Speaker 02: do it both way. We can
00:16:05 Speaker 02: have the result in the end.
00:16:07 Speaker 02: People can ask to can move
00:16:08 Speaker 02: simply a portion at the beginning,
00:16:10 Speaker 02: or they can ask to split.
00:16:13 Speaker 02: That still achieves. But still achieves
00:16:15 Speaker 02: the same accomplishment. So, because I
00:16:17 Speaker 02: did not actually have Councillor Greg
00:16:19 Speaker 02: did not move it. Councillor Dickerd
00:16:20 Speaker 02: had raised his hand to second.
00:16:22 Speaker 02: So, Councillor Dickerd, would you be
00:16:24 Speaker 02: willing to move the first part
00:16:25 Speaker 02: of this? Okay. He has confirmed
00:16:28 Speaker 02: that he has. So, I would
00:16:29 Speaker 02: then need a seconder for this
00:16:32 Speaker 02: report, and I've got that from
00:16:34 Speaker 02: Councillor Mackie. Thank you. So now
00:16:37 Speaker 02: this report is on the floor
00:16:40 Speaker 02: for discussion. Director Cornell and Deputy
00:16:42 Speaker 02: CAO, if you would like to.
00:16:45 Speaker 02: come to the lectern and focus
00:16:51 Speaker 02: in on just the topic at
00:16:53 Speaker 02: hand before we continue to the
00:16:56 Speaker 02: rest. Good morning, Madam Warden, members
00:16:57 Speaker 02: of Council. So Jen and I
00:17:00 Speaker 02: have split up. Director Corneil and
00:17:01 Speaker 10: I split up the balance of
00:17:03 Speaker 10: the the notes from the long
00:17:05 Speaker 10: term care committee of management meeting,
00:17:07 Speaker 10: and and I drew the the
00:17:08 Speaker 10: short straw and got this report.
00:17:10 Speaker 10: So quite happy to provide some.
00:17:12 Speaker 10: opening comments and then try and
00:17:14 Speaker 10: answer any questions that may come
00:17:17 Speaker 10: forward from this. So, as part
00:17:19 Speaker 10: of the budget process earlier this
00:17:23 Speaker 10: year, council confirmed the allocation of
00:17:26 Speaker 10: some funding to go towards an
00:17:28 Speaker 10: investigation of potential future options for
00:17:31 Speaker 10: the Rockwood Terrace site and for
00:17:34 Speaker 10: the Grey Gables site. And as
00:17:36 Speaker 10: as council will recall, in late
00:17:38 Speaker 10: 2025, we received some some survey
00:17:40 Speaker 10: requests. from the Ministry of Long
00:17:42 Speaker 10: Term Care in regards to both
00:17:45 Speaker 10: properties and the allocations of potential
00:17:48 Speaker 10: capital funding towards future long term
00:17:50 Speaker 10: care beds at both sites in
00:17:53 Speaker 10: various different ways. We are also,
00:17:55 Speaker 10: obviously, in the process of far
00:17:57 Speaker 10: down the process of constructing the
00:17:59 Speaker 10: new Rockwood Terrace, which will leave
00:18:01 Speaker 10: us with the old Rockwood Terrace
00:18:02 Speaker 10: facility that we have to have
00:18:05 Speaker 10: some idea and conversation around what
00:18:09 Speaker 10: to do with. And so, based.
00:18:11 Speaker 10: on the direction through budget, staff
00:18:13 Speaker 10: have engaged Colliers, who have been
00:18:15 Speaker 10: working with us on Rockwood Terrace,
00:18:16 Speaker 10: and through Colliers, a team of
00:18:19 Speaker 10: professionals to look at both buildings
00:18:21 Speaker 10: and a full options assessment for
00:18:23 Speaker 10: both Gray Gables site and for
00:18:25 Speaker 10: the Rockwood Terrace site, the existing
00:18:26 Speaker 10: Rockwood Terrace site. And so, at
00:18:28 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management,
00:18:29 Speaker 10: we provided a bit of an
00:18:30 Speaker 10: update on that work. The report
00:18:33 Speaker 10: is not finalised at this point;
00:18:34 Speaker 10: it was a draft report. The
00:18:35 Speaker 10: draft report, when finalised, will be
00:18:38 Speaker 10: coming. Well, once it's finished, it
00:18:40 Speaker 10: will come back to committee as
00:18:42 Speaker 10: a whole for conversation. The update
00:18:43 Speaker 10: included the scenarios that we've we've
00:18:45 Speaker 10: worked through, some of the options
00:18:48 Speaker 10: that exist when each one of
00:18:49 Speaker 10: those scenarios. So at Rockwood Terrace,
00:18:51 Speaker 10: the scenarios go from leasing the
00:18:54 Speaker 10: building as is to sale of
00:18:57 Speaker 10: the building and site, through to
00:18:59 Speaker 10: the redevelopment of that building into
00:19:01 Speaker 10: a number of different potential future
00:19:02 Speaker 10: uses, including long term care facilities
00:19:04 Speaker 10: of a class A standard. so
00:19:05 Speaker 10: very similar to the standard of
00:19:07 Speaker 10: the facilities that we have at
00:19:09 Speaker 10: our other homes, and indeed a
00:19:13 Speaker 10: building at the new Rockwood Terrace,
00:19:15 Speaker 10: through to looking at options for
00:19:17 Speaker 10: assisted living, affordable living, and seniors'
00:19:18 Speaker 10: community, and a blended option within
00:19:21 Speaker 10: that as well. So, a full
00:19:24 Speaker 10: range of scenarios for the existing
00:19:26 Speaker 10: Rockwood Terrace building were considered, and
00:19:28 Speaker 10: some some Class D estimates provided
00:19:28 Speaker 10: around what they might they might
00:19:30 Speaker 10: look like if we were to
00:19:32 Speaker 10: move forward with any of those
00:19:34 Speaker 10: at some. point in the future,
00:19:36 Speaker 10: and then in regards to the
00:19:39 Speaker 10: Grey Gables site, council will recall
00:19:42 Speaker 10: that we do have an allocation
00:19:45 Speaker 10: of capital funding allocated to Grey
00:19:48 Speaker 10: Gables. It's quite specific to building
00:19:49 Speaker 10: a new 128-bed facility on that
00:19:52 Speaker 10: site, and so we wanted to
00:19:55 Speaker 10: look at other options that were
00:19:56 Speaker 10: potentially available at Grey Gables, aligned
00:19:58 Speaker 10: with new ministry funding programmemes, to
00:19:59 Speaker 10: inform whether or not we asked
00:20:01 Speaker 10: to retain those 62-bed. Retain those
00:20:03 Speaker 10: 62 beds, pass them back to
00:20:04 Speaker 10: the province, or look for some
00:20:07 Speaker 10: other option. And so, based on
00:20:08 Speaker 10: some of the work that the
00:20:10 Speaker 10: Colliers team talked through through Long
00:20:12 Speaker 10: Term Care Committee of Management, we
00:20:15 Speaker 10: looked at a new build on
00:20:18 Speaker 10: the site as well as the
00:20:20 Speaker 10: existing building, and what various different
00:20:22 Speaker 10: additions to Grey Gables could look
00:20:25 Speaker 10: like to use that capital allocation.
00:20:29 Speaker 10: And again, some high level numbers
00:20:31 Speaker 10: were provided on that. Committee, Long
00:20:33 Speaker 10: Term Care Committee of Management, also.
00:20:35 Speaker 10: discussed requests to extend some funding
00:20:37 Speaker 10: associated to this work, and so
00:20:39 Speaker 10: that's the request for thirty thousand
00:20:41 Speaker 10: dollars additional funding to support this
00:20:42 Speaker 10: work, and that's related to a
00:20:45 Speaker 10: fairly late in the day announcement
00:20:45 Speaker 10: by the province. So the Ministry
00:20:46 Speaker 10: of Long Term Care announced just
00:20:48 Speaker 10: as we were starting to get
00:20:50 Speaker 10: to the point where, in fact,
00:20:51 Speaker 10: we'd already had done the slides
00:20:53 Speaker 10: for the report to go to
00:20:56 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management,
00:20:58 Speaker 10: as well as the report itself.
00:21:00 Speaker 10: The province announced a new funding
00:21:03 Speaker 10: stream. so the the province has
00:21:05 Speaker 10: long supported capital allocations towards long-term
00:21:08 Speaker 10: care for the creation of new
00:21:10 Speaker 10: bed spaces. Up until very recently,
00:21:14 Speaker 10: as I say, the last few
00:21:15 Speaker 10: few weeks really, that has been
00:21:16 Speaker 10: tied to new beds built to
00:21:18 Speaker 10: modern-day new standards. That's the one
00:21:20 Speaker 10: of the one of the reasons
00:21:22 Speaker 10: why we're building the new Rockwood
00:21:24 Speaker 10: Terrace was to take beds that
00:21:26 Speaker 10: were being delivered at a a
00:21:29 Speaker 10: class C level to create beds
00:21:31 Speaker 10: that were being delivered. at a
00:21:32 Speaker 10: class A level. So, the province
00:21:34 Speaker 10: has long provided capital funding to
00:21:36 Speaker 10: support that work. As I say,
00:21:38 Speaker 10: fairly late on in the day,
00:21:40 Speaker 10: they have introduced a new funding
00:21:43 Speaker 10: stream, which is a renovation funding
00:21:46 Speaker 10: stream. Now, there's not a great
00:21:48 Speaker 10: deal of details around what this
00:21:49 Speaker 10: is, other than they have indicated
00:21:51 Speaker 10: that there is capital funding pot,
00:21:54 Speaker 10: which is less generous than the
00:21:56 Speaker 10: new capital funding pot. It's a
00:22:00 Speaker 10: renovation capital funding pot that can
00:22:02 Speaker 10: go. towards renovations of existing long-term
00:22:05 Speaker 10: care beds to an alternative standard.
00:22:06 Speaker 10: Now, what they've they've been light
00:22:07 Speaker 10: on is what that alternative standard
00:22:09 Speaker 10: might look like. It's probably better
00:22:12 Speaker 10: than it is today, but not
00:22:13 Speaker 10: as good as the ones we're
00:22:15 Speaker 10: building and seeing in new facilities
00:22:18 Speaker 10: being built today. And so, the
00:22:20 Speaker 10: the intent we believe that the
00:22:21 Speaker 10: province on this one is they
00:22:24 Speaker 10: are up against a pressing need
00:22:26 Speaker 10: to activate long-term care beds. And
00:22:29 Speaker 10: so, I think. with new builds
00:22:31 Speaker 10: happening across the province, they're looking
00:22:33 Speaker 10: to see if there are opportunities
00:22:34 Speaker 10: for the reactivation of the beds
00:22:35 Speaker 10: which are being retired as those
00:22:37 Speaker 10: new beds come into being. It's
00:22:39 Speaker 10: quite clear that this is a
00:22:41 Speaker 10: very different programme to the capital
00:22:43 Speaker 10: funding stream. So the funding is
00:22:45 Speaker 10: only tied to a 15-year operating
00:22:47 Speaker 10: commitment rather than a longer-term operating
00:22:49 Speaker 10: agreement. The funding is less, and
00:22:50 Speaker 10: they have introduced this idea of
00:22:52 Speaker 10: an alternative standard. There are certain
00:22:54 Speaker 10: things that they've taken off the
00:22:54 Speaker 10: table when it. comes to the
00:22:56 Speaker 10: alternative standard, but the rest of
00:22:58 Speaker 10: the table is fairly empty and
00:23:00 Speaker 10: vacant, and we have no idea
00:23:02 Speaker 10: what it looks like. And so,
00:23:04 Speaker 10: with the announcement of this potential
00:23:06 Speaker 10: funding, we felt that it would
00:23:08 Speaker 10: be appropriate to request the Support
00:23:09 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management
00:23:12 Speaker 10: and then Council to extend the
00:23:14 Speaker 10: scope of work to consider that
00:23:15 Speaker 10: renovation funding and what that could
00:23:16 Speaker 10: look like at Rockwood Terrace. Once
00:23:20 Speaker 10: again, at the conclusion of that
00:23:22 Speaker 10: report, the report will come back
00:23:27 Speaker 10: to Committee of the Whole. I'd
00:23:29 Speaker 10: be happy to take any questions.
00:23:31 Speaker 10: Okay, thank you. So it's on
00:23:35 Speaker 10: the floor for discussion. Deputy Warden.
00:23:37 Speaker 11: Thank you, Madam Warden, and thank
00:23:38 Speaker 11: you, Nile, for the report. Late
00:23:41 Speaker 11: in the day, desperation, hail Mary,
00:23:42 Speaker 11: however you want to describe it,
00:23:44 Speaker 11: that's what it sounds like to
00:23:46 Speaker 11: me by the provincial government. There's
00:23:48 Speaker 11: no doubt that there is a
00:23:49 Speaker 11: pressing need for long-term care beds
00:23:52 Speaker 11: in the province, but here
00:23:54 Speaker 11: in Grey County. Here in Gray
00:23:56 Speaker 11: County, we've already been down this
00:24:00 Speaker 11: road before. We decided to build
00:24:04 Speaker 11: the new facility in Durham. We
00:24:06 Speaker 11: had different contractors, different developers go
00:24:09 Speaker 11: through that building, and every one
00:24:11 Speaker 11: of them said it's cost prohibitive.
00:24:14 Speaker 11: Why, if are we even considering
00:24:15 Speaker 11: pouring another thirty thousand into the
00:24:17 Speaker 11: bucket to have the same outcome?
00:24:20 Speaker 11: I think we all know what
00:24:22 Speaker 11: the outcome would be, or what
00:24:23 Speaker 11: the answer might. be to a
00:24:25 Speaker 11: request for us to fund more
00:24:27 Speaker 11: beds, if the province is so
00:24:29 Speaker 11: hell bent on doing this, they
00:24:31 Speaker 11: put the thirty thousand in the
00:24:33 Speaker 11: bucket and they can fund the
00:24:36 Speaker 11: new beds. And they can also
00:24:38 Speaker 11: try to find staff, good staff
00:24:40 Speaker 11: that we have. There's not many
00:24:43 Speaker 11: of them because they're hard to
00:24:46 Speaker 11: find, but we've got good staff.
00:24:47 Speaker 11: I'm not sure there's a supply
00:24:51 Speaker 11: of good staff to fund another
00:24:54 Speaker 11: facility of this nature. So I
00:24:59 Speaker 11: am. not supportive of this right
00:25:01 Speaker 11: now, but I'll wait to see
00:25:04 Speaker 11: what my colleagues think. Thank you.
00:25:07 Speaker 11: Okay, thank you very much. Other
00:25:08 Speaker 12: discussion, Councillor Gray. I'll leave with
00:25:10 Speaker 12: a question right off the bat,
00:25:27 Speaker 12: either to Jen or Nile. What
00:25:27 Speaker 12: is the subsidy currently carried by
00:25:32 Speaker 13: the taxpayer through the tax levy
00:25:35 Speaker 13: for every bed we have right
00:25:38 Speaker 13: now in the County of Grey?
00:25:40 Speaker 13: I threw you, Madam Lord, in
00:25:42 Speaker 13: twenty-eight thousand dollars. So here's
00:25:44 Speaker 07: what I can support. I can
00:25:46 Speaker 07: support us continuing to look at
00:25:50 Speaker 07: an expansion of Grey Gables with
00:25:51 Speaker 07: a couple. Of Gray Gables with
00:25:56 Speaker 07: a couple extra pods, as it
00:25:57 Speaker 07: was originally designed, and could perhaps
00:26:00 Speaker 07: accommodate and create efficiencies in our
00:26:03 Speaker 07: service delivery, looking to minimize as
00:26:06 Speaker 07: best we can that cost per
00:26:08 Speaker 07: bed. I cannot support, and I'm
00:26:10 Speaker 07: going to add a little to
00:26:14 Speaker 07: my colleague here, Deputy Warden Milne.
00:26:16 Speaker 07: Even if they funded all the
00:26:19 Speaker 07: capital requirements, we haven't begun to
00:26:21 Speaker 07: talk about the operational costs, the
00:26:24 Speaker 07: service delivery. Costs of service delivery.
00:26:26 Speaker 07: We have talked about it around
00:26:28 Speaker 07: this table for several terms
00:26:32 Speaker 07: of council. We are not competitive
00:26:34 Speaker 07: with the private sector. I am
00:26:36 Speaker 07: completely in line with continuing our
00:26:39 Speaker 07: obligation and our excellent service provision
00:26:41 Speaker 07: for the beds that we currently
00:26:43 Speaker 07: have. Potentially, could add sixty-eight. Perhaps
00:26:46 Speaker 07: create efficiencies. That should be our
00:26:47 Speaker 07: goal in business as a corporation
00:26:49 Speaker 07: in service delivery. Look for service.
00:26:51 Speaker 07: for efficiencies in controlling the costs,
00:26:54 Speaker 07: but there is absolutely no way
00:26:57 Speaker 07: I can support further looking at
00:26:59 Speaker 07: thirty thousand dollars to expand the
00:27:00 Speaker 07: scope of the study to come
00:27:03 Speaker 07: back and tell us what we
00:27:04 Speaker 07: should already know sitting around this
00:27:06 Speaker 07: table today that we cannot compete
00:27:08 Speaker 07: with the private sector, and this
00:27:11 Speaker 07: is not something that we should
00:27:12 Speaker 07: be doing either this sitting council
00:27:14 Speaker 07: or regardless of the sitting council
00:27:17 Speaker 07: to get more information and come
00:27:19 Speaker 07: back. and tell us the same,
00:27:20 Speaker 07: the outcome that we already know
00:27:22 Speaker 07: today makes no sense and is
00:27:24 Speaker 07: a waste of thirty thousand dollars
00:27:25 Speaker 07: of taxpayers' dollars that should not
00:27:27 Speaker 07: be spent investigating this. Like Deputy
00:27:29 Speaker 07: Warden Milne said, if the province
00:27:30 Speaker 07: is so hell bent on it,
00:27:36 Speaker 07: then they can line up with
00:27:40 Speaker 14: a private provider and they can
00:27:41 Speaker 14: try to compete on that level
00:27:44 Speaker 14: in terms of bed expansion. But
00:27:46 Speaker 15: this is not for the County
00:27:48 Speaker 15: Grey to be pursuing. Okay, I'll
00:27:50 Speaker 15: look for any other discussion from
00:27:53 Speaker 15: council members, and I'll look back
00:27:54 Speaker 15: to staff. I'll go to the
00:27:57 Speaker 15: C.A.O. Thank you, and through you,
00:27:58 Speaker 15: Warden, and appreciate all the comments
00:28:00 Speaker 15: in terms of from from both
00:28:02 Speaker 15: Councillor Mill and Councillor Gregg with
00:28:03 Speaker 15: respect to with respect to this.
00:28:05 Speaker 15: Just wanted to highlight note that
00:28:08 Speaker 15: all the options that are that
00:28:12 Speaker 15: have been explored to date, as
00:28:15 Speaker 15: well as this particular option, from
00:28:18 Speaker 15: what I understand, looks at all
00:28:20 Speaker 15: options. in terms of either the
00:28:22 Speaker 15: county potentially owning and operating, the
00:28:23 Speaker 15: county owning and potentially leasing to
00:28:25 Speaker 15: a private operator, or divesting of
00:28:26 Speaker 15: that property for a potential use.
00:28:28 Speaker 15: That potential use could be this
00:28:30 Speaker 15: option in terms of a long-term
00:28:34 Speaker 15: care home option. Could be the
00:28:36 Speaker 15: other options that have already been
00:28:39 Speaker 15: explored to date. So I just
00:28:41 Speaker 15: wanted to flag that and note
00:28:43 Speaker 15: that that this would be part
00:28:45 Speaker 15: of my understanding that analysis is.
00:28:48 Speaker 15: that it's not necessarily looking at
00:28:50 Speaker 15: just the county owning and operating
00:28:53 Speaker 15: a long-term care facility under this
00:28:55 Speaker 15: new standard, under this new funding
00:28:57 Speaker 10: model. It could be somebody else
00:28:58 Speaker 10: potentially that could operate that as
00:29:02 Speaker 10: another option. So I don't know
00:29:03 Speaker 10: if Nile or Jen have anything
00:29:05 Speaker 10: further with respect to that. So
00:29:06 Speaker 10: through you, Madam Warden, the CIO
00:29:08 Speaker 10: is quite correct. This is this
00:29:10 Speaker 10: is in all cases. the consideration
00:29:13 Speaker 10: is it could be the county
00:29:16 Speaker 10: that operates, it could be a
00:29:19 Speaker 10: third-party private vendor, it could be
00:29:21 Speaker 10: some sort of a partnership arrangement
00:29:24 Speaker 10: in between those two things. And
00:29:26 Speaker 10: the other thing is just to
00:29:28 Speaker 10: to reinforce the any future the
00:29:30 Speaker 10: the the intent of the work
00:29:33 Speaker 10: being done is to inform the
00:29:34 Speaker 10: future debate around what to do
00:29:36 Speaker 10: with the existing long long-term care
00:29:38 Speaker 10: home at Rockwood Terrace and what
00:29:39 Speaker 10: to do with the existing allocation
00:29:41 Speaker 10: of. The existing allocations of capital
00:29:43 Speaker 10: funding at Grey Gables, and so
00:29:45 Speaker 10: that's that the the intent behind
00:29:47 Speaker 10: the report is simply to provide
00:29:48 Speaker 10: the information so that when we
00:29:54 Speaker 10: have those questions and conversations later
00:29:55 Speaker 10: on, there are no decisions being
00:29:59 Speaker 10: made at this point in time
00:30:00 Speaker 16: as to options that are preferred,
00:30:03 Speaker 16: options to explore over other options,
00:30:05 Speaker 16: or any sort of priority associated
00:30:10 Speaker 16: to those options. But you're quite
00:30:11 Speaker 16: correct. Okay, thank you. I'll go
00:30:13 Speaker 16: to Councillor Dobrine, and then over
00:30:18 Speaker 16: to Councillor Mackie. And then over
00:30:21 Speaker 16: to Councillor Mackey next. Thank you,
00:30:24 Speaker 16: Warden, and good morning. And thank
00:30:27 Speaker 16: you, Nile. I appreciate the concern.
00:30:30 Speaker 16: I I think I want to
00:30:33 Speaker 16: explore. Will this expanded scope? Think
00:30:35 Speaker 16: I heard the answer, but I
00:30:40 Speaker 16: just want to clarify. Will this
00:30:43 Speaker 16: expanded scope include options for Grey
00:30:47 Speaker 16: Gables? So, under we know that
00:30:50 Speaker 16: we have allocation for sixty-two new
00:30:53 Speaker 16: beds. To new beds in a
00:30:54 Speaker 16: new facility, brand new, similar to
00:30:57 Speaker 16: the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment, which would
00:30:58 Speaker 16: leave the existing Gray Gables for
00:31:00 Speaker 16: some other use. But could will
00:31:02 Speaker 16: this include exploring an expansion renovation
00:31:05 Speaker 10: to Gray Gables that could also
00:31:08 Speaker 10: incorporate those, if the province were
00:31:13 Speaker 10: agreeable, to to rather than than
00:31:15 Speaker 10: a total new build. So. that's
00:31:17 Speaker 10: kind of where my question is.
00:31:21 Speaker 10: So, to you, Madam Warden, thank
00:31:23 Speaker 10: you for the question. No, none
00:31:24 Speaker 10: of the thirty thousand would apply
00:31:26 Speaker 10: to Grey Gables. Grey Gables meets
00:31:27 Speaker 10: all provincial standards and is is
00:31:32 Speaker 17: not is not therefore scheduled for
00:31:37 Speaker 17: a renovation or or getting the
00:31:40 Speaker 17: renovated renovation funding. So, this is
00:31:42 Speaker 17: specific to renovation of retired retired,
00:31:45 Speaker 16: if you like, long term care
00:31:47 Speaker 16: beds. Long-term care beds, where and
00:31:50 Speaker 16: the only ones we will have
00:31:52 Speaker 16: are the ones that are in
00:31:56 Speaker 16: the existing Rockwood Terrace building.
00:32:02 Speaker 16: So this is very specific to
00:32:04 Speaker 16: Rockwood Terrace. Thank you, and I
00:32:08 Speaker 16: appreciate that. I I'm inclined to
00:32:12 Speaker 16: agree in that all the information
00:32:15 Speaker 16: that we had at the time
00:32:17 Speaker 16: of deciding on you know 100
00:32:19 Speaker 16: million dollars to redevelop Rockwood Terrace
00:32:21 Speaker 16: in Durham was based. on the
00:32:24 Speaker 16: information that the province saw our
00:32:27 Speaker 16: existing facility as undevelopable, unexpandable, and
00:32:31 Speaker 16: unsuitable. And now that we've invested
00:32:33 Speaker 16: and we are this close to
00:32:33 Speaker 16: opening, they have a change of
00:32:37 Speaker 16: heart, and everything that we knew
00:32:40 Speaker 16: then, or that the information that
00:32:42 Speaker 18: we had at our disposal to
00:32:44 Speaker 18: make that decision. was based that
00:32:47 Speaker 18: Rockwood Terrace should not be redeveloped,
00:32:49 Speaker 18: or could not be redeveloped. So,
00:32:51 Speaker 18: I'm inclined to agree. Thank you.
00:32:53 Speaker 18: Okay, we're going to go to
00:32:56 Speaker 18: Councillor Mackey, and then I'll look
00:32:59 Speaker 18: for other hands. Thank you, Madam
00:33:01 Speaker 18: Warden. Good morning, County Council. It
00:33:03 Speaker 18: is frustrating the fact that we're
00:33:05 Speaker 18: spending so much money on a
00:33:06 Speaker 18: new development when this information came
00:33:08 Speaker 18: out that the old one possibly
00:33:11 Speaker 18: could have been retrofitted. So I
00:33:15 Speaker 18: mean, I share that frustration with
00:33:16 Speaker 18: my colleagues. I agree with my
00:33:18 Speaker 18: friends across the the horseshoe in
00:33:19 Speaker 18: regards to the amount of money
00:33:20 Speaker 18: that Gray County has spent and
00:33:22 Speaker 18: is spending on long term care.
00:33:24 Speaker 18: I fully support the money that
00:33:26 Speaker 18: we are spending on long term
00:33:30 Speaker 18: care. It's important. We're doing a
00:33:31 Speaker 18: bang up job. Our elderly are
00:33:33 Speaker 18: well taken care of in our
00:33:35 Speaker 18: homes. and if I had to
00:33:36 Speaker 18: place a loved one in a
00:33:38 Speaker 18: home, I'd be hoping to get
00:33:39 Speaker 18: a county bed. That being said,
00:33:41 Speaker 18: I don't think we can afford
00:33:43 Speaker 18: to keep going with any more,
00:33:44 Speaker 18: whether it be Gregables expansion or
00:33:46 Speaker 18: an expansion of an old Rockwood.
00:33:48 Speaker 18: I just don't think we can
00:33:49 Speaker 18: afford, with all the other budgetary
00:33:50 Speaker 18: constraints that we're going to have.
00:33:52 Speaker 18: I don't think we can afford,
00:33:54 Speaker 18: you know, any more. The thirty
00:33:57 Speaker 18: thousand, when we had that discussion
00:33:58 Speaker 18: at the long-term care committee of
00:33:59 Speaker 18: management, is more about what are
00:34:02 Speaker 18: the next steps. for us? We
00:34:04 Speaker 18: know we're going to have a
00:34:05 Speaker 18: vacant Rockwood Terrace that we have
00:34:07 Speaker 18: to make some decisions on. It's
00:34:09 Speaker 18: going to cost us a fair
00:34:11 Speaker 18: a fair amount of dollars per
00:34:13 Speaker 18: month to keep that place, you
00:34:15 Speaker 18: know, empty, you know, with security
00:34:17 Speaker 18: and heating. So we got to
00:34:18 Speaker 18: make some decisions. I won't be
00:34:20 Speaker 18: making that decision, but members of
00:34:21 Speaker 18: this horseshoe that are elected will
00:34:23 Speaker 18: be making that decision. So the
00:34:25 Speaker 18: long-term care committee management just wanted
00:34:26 Speaker 18: to make sure that the new
00:34:28 Speaker 18: council has all the information to
00:34:30 Speaker 18: make make the best. To make
00:34:33 Speaker 18: the best informed decision, and that's
00:34:34 Speaker 18: really what this thirty thousand is
00:34:36 Speaker 18: about. And not that I like
00:34:37 Speaker 18: spending thirty thousand on something that
00:34:38 Speaker 18: I think I know the answer
00:34:40 Speaker 18: to. As far as you know,
00:34:42 Speaker 18: possible redevelopment of new beds, I
00:34:43 Speaker 18: don't think that's in the cards.
00:34:44 Speaker 18: But knowing what to do with
00:34:46 Speaker 18: that that building is going to
00:34:50 Speaker 18: you know have impact on well
00:34:52 Speaker 18: a campus of care. You know
00:34:55 Speaker 18: we've talked about a campus of
00:34:58 Speaker 18: care for a long time and
00:34:58 Speaker 18: that potential. I don't know what
00:35:01 Speaker 18: the cost of that would be,
00:35:03 Speaker 18: but we know we have a
00:35:04 Speaker 18: shortfall. in some of the other
00:35:06 Speaker 18: beds for seniors and some of
00:35:07 Speaker 18: the senior services that are required.
00:35:09 Speaker 18: You know we've got long-term care,
00:35:10 Speaker 18: we've got retirement homes, but we
00:35:12 Speaker 18: don't have that that missing link
00:35:13 Speaker 18: in between. So this information would
00:35:16 Speaker 18: provide more options on what we
00:35:17 Speaker 18: could do in that regard too.
00:35:18 Speaker 18: Affordable housing for seniors. There's a
00:35:21 Speaker 18: there's a lot of things that
00:35:22 Speaker 18: can be looked at through this
00:35:23 Speaker 18: thirty thousand dollars to help the
00:35:26 Speaker 18: new council make the decisions. You
00:35:27 Speaker 18: know that are going to have
00:35:30 Speaker 18: to be made. So I'll just
00:35:35 Speaker 18: leave it that, and I do
00:35:37 Speaker 19: support spending that money because I
00:35:39 Speaker 19: think that information. And this is
00:35:41 Speaker 19: on behalf of the Long Term
00:35:43 Speaker 19: Care Committee of Management. We had
00:35:45 Speaker 19: that discussion, and the committee thought
00:35:49 Speaker 20: that that money was going to
00:35:55 Speaker 20: be important for the new council
00:36:01 Speaker 20: to make informed decisions. I'll leave
00:36:04 Speaker 20: it at that. Thank you. Thank
00:36:08 Speaker 20: you, and I'll just look for
00:36:11 Speaker 20: any other input. Okay, Councillor Greg.
00:36:14 Speaker 20: I would like to place an
00:36:18 Speaker 20: amendment on the floor. to remove
00:36:19 Speaker 20: the last of the three bullets
00:36:22 Speaker 20: there that staff beeps directed to
00:36:25 Speaker 20: extend the scope of work with
00:36:28 Speaker 20: Colliers to investigate scenario five. I
00:36:30 Speaker 20: am totally. I understand Chair Mackey's
00:36:33 Speaker 20: comments, but perhaps Nile could remind
00:36:35 Speaker 20: Council what the expenditure on the
00:36:37 Speaker 20: original consultant's study was. for this
00:36:40 Speaker 20: project. Most of, I think, what
00:36:42 Speaker 20: you spoke to should be contained
00:36:44 Speaker 20: in already the considerable sum of
00:36:46 Speaker 20: money that we hired the colliers
00:36:48 Speaker 07: to pre-provide information back to this
00:36:53 Speaker 07: council for already. So, I understand
00:36:56 Speaker 07: where you're coming from and representing
00:37:06 Speaker 07: the committee, but I think value
00:37:11 Speaker 07: for money in terms of the
00:37:13 Speaker 21: bids and tenders and the deliverables
00:37:15 Speaker 21: and that. original that original project
00:37:16 Speaker 21: scope, it should certainly have already
00:37:17 Speaker 21: entertained. I think most of what
00:37:19 Speaker 21: you're just mentioning there, because it
00:37:21 Speaker 21: was significant, and that was what
00:37:24 Speaker 21: we were talking about was future
00:37:26 Speaker 21: uses. Okay, so there was a
00:37:28 Speaker 21: question about the holistic costing. I'll
00:37:30 Speaker 21: leave it to staff. Okay. Perhaps
00:37:32 Speaker 21: let me see procedurally. Okay. Well,
00:37:34 Speaker 21: there's been a move, but also
00:37:35 Speaker 21: embedded into that is a question.
00:37:36 Speaker 21: So I think what I better
00:37:39 Speaker 21: do is I better call for
00:37:41 Speaker 21: a second or first before we
00:37:42 Speaker 21: go into further dialogueue on that.
00:37:44 Speaker 21: So Councillor Gregg has moved that
00:37:49 Speaker 21: the motion be amended to strike
00:37:51 Speaker 21: out the third clause of the
00:37:54 Speaker 21: motion regarding extending the scope of
00:37:56 Speaker 21: work with Colliers. Is there a
00:37:58 Speaker 21: second or for that? Is there
00:38:00 Speaker 21: a seconder for that? We've got
00:38:03 Speaker 10: a seconder by Councillor McKay, so
00:38:05 Speaker 10: that's now on the floor for
00:38:09 Speaker 10: discussion. So now I will look
00:38:11 Speaker 10: to staff to provide answers to
00:38:14 Speaker 10: the questions, and then we will
00:38:17 Speaker 10: move into discussion only on this
00:38:19 Speaker 10: particular motion. Thank you, Madam Warden.
00:38:23 Speaker 10: The total scope of work that
00:38:26 Speaker 10: Colliers have been engaged with with
00:38:28 Speaker 10: their subconsultants and subtrades to this
00:38:31 Speaker 10: point in time has a total
00:38:34 Speaker 10: approved budget of around about $195,000.
00:38:35 Speaker 10: Ninety-five thousand dollars. It does cover
00:38:36 Speaker 10: most of the options that were
00:38:39 Speaker 10: were listed by by the question
00:38:41 Speaker 10: in terms of future uses for
00:38:42 Speaker 10: for long-term care. The request for
00:38:44 Speaker 10: the thirty thousand is very specific
00:38:46 Speaker 10: to renovation of Rockwood Terrace. has
00:38:47 Speaker 10: a hundred and a hundred beds
00:38:52 Speaker 10: currently. The the thirty thousand would
00:38:54 Speaker 10: figure out what the alternative standard
00:38:56 Speaker 10: that the ministry is articulating. could
00:38:57 Speaker 10: look like how many of those
00:38:59 Speaker 10: alternative standard beds would be able
00:39:00 Speaker 10: to be provided within the fabric
00:39:04 Speaker 10: of the building, and what the
00:39:06 Speaker 10: capital construction costs and operating costs
00:39:08 Speaker 10: of that building would be on
00:39:11 Speaker 10: a go forward basis. That's not
00:39:13 Speaker 10: a scenario that was originally considered
00:39:15 Speaker 10: in that scope of work because,
00:39:16 Speaker 10: as has been indicated by members
00:39:18 Speaker 10: of council, there was no funding
00:39:21 Speaker 10: available previously for renovation funding. So
00:39:25 Speaker 10: this this happened quite late in
00:39:29 Speaker 22: the day. So the scope. of
00:39:31 Speaker 22: that thirty thousand is very specific
00:39:32 Speaker 22: to the renovation of the existing
00:39:33 Speaker 22: Rockwood Terrace to some number of
00:39:36 Speaker 22: long-term care beds. It would be
00:39:37 Speaker 22: somewhere less than a hundred because
00:39:39 Speaker 22: the alternative standard will be better
00:39:41 Speaker 22: than the standard we provide today,
00:39:48 Speaker 22: but we have no idea what
00:39:51 Speaker 23: that would be, and therefore what
00:39:53 Speaker 23: the the operating and capital costs
00:39:54 Speaker 23: would be associated to it. Okay,
00:39:57 Speaker 23: thank you. Any discussion on this
00:39:59 Speaker 23: particular? motion? Okay, I'm not seeing
00:40:00 Speaker 02: any hands up. Then I'll call
00:40:02 Speaker 02: the question on this one. That
00:40:03 Speaker 02: that the motion be that we
00:40:05 Speaker 02: strike out the third clause of
00:40:08 Speaker 02: the motion regarding the extending of
00:40:09 Speaker 02: the scope of work with Colliers.
00:40:11 Speaker 02: All those in favour of this
00:40:13 Speaker 02: motion? Okay, that's carried. So, Madam
00:40:17 Speaker 02: Clerk, that then strikes out back
00:40:20 Speaker 02: to the main motion that has
00:40:23 Speaker 02: already been. moved, which was only
00:40:25 Speaker 02: this report, not the rest of
00:40:26 Speaker 02: the long term care, not the
00:40:28 Speaker 02: adoption of the minutes and the
00:40:30 Speaker 02: rest of the long term care
00:40:31 Speaker 02: committee of management minutes, and the
00:40:35 Speaker 02: resolutions contained therein. So we're now
00:40:37 Speaker 02: back to the main motion, which
00:40:40 Speaker 02: you can see is now reduced
00:40:43 Speaker 02: to only these two points of
00:40:46 Speaker 02: this LTCRCM twenty sixteen twenty six
00:40:48 Speaker 02: report: the recommendation that the Colliers
00:40:52 Speaker 02: Project Leaders report and report and
00:40:54 Speaker 02: presentation. regarding the future options for
00:40:56 Speaker 02: grey cables and the existing Rockward
00:40:58 Speaker 02: Terrace be received for information, and
00:41:02 Speaker 02: that staff continue discussions with the
00:41:04 Speaker 02: Ministry of Long Term Care in
00:41:05 Speaker 02: respect to previous ministry surveys and
00:41:09 Speaker 02: future planning, and report back to
00:41:11 Speaker 02: Council as appropriate. So that has
00:41:13 Speaker 02: been moved, and who? Sorry, who
00:41:15 Speaker 02: moved and seconded that? We had
00:41:17 Speaker 02: that one moved by Councillor Gregg
00:41:20 Speaker 02: and seconded by Councillor. Oh, sorry.
00:41:22 Speaker 02: No, it was Councillor. I yes,
00:41:25 Speaker 02: it was carried. It was moved
00:41:27 Speaker 02: by Councillor Dicker and seconded by
00:41:31 Speaker 02: Councillor Mackie. Yes, correct. Okay, good.
00:41:32 Speaker 02: All right. So with that, then
00:41:34 Speaker 02: any further discussion on these two
00:41:36 Speaker 02: items in this report? Okay. All
00:41:37 Speaker 02: those in favour, and that is
00:41:41 Speaker 02: carried. Now we're going to return
00:41:44 Speaker 02: to the remainder of the minutes
00:41:48 Speaker 02: of the Long Term Care Committee
00:41:53 Speaker 02: of Management, which included the other
00:41:55 Speaker 02: resolutions. that were in there that
00:41:58 Speaker 24: have been duly circulated and shared
00:42:00 Speaker 24: in the public distribution of the
00:42:02 Speaker 24: agenda, and for that now I
00:42:07 Speaker 24: will need a fresh mover and
00:42:10 Speaker 24: a seconder for this. Move by
00:42:11 Speaker 09: Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the Deputy
00:42:14 Speaker 09: Warden. It's now on the floor
00:42:15 Speaker 09: for discussion. Any discussion on these
00:42:17 Speaker 09: resolutions? Oh, sorry. We're going to
00:42:19 Speaker 09: circle back to staff. Good morning,
00:42:21 Speaker 09: Director Cornell. Good morning, Warden, and
00:42:22 Speaker 09: good morning, County Council. And I
00:42:25 Speaker 09: don't need to go through the
00:42:27 Speaker 09: motions that are there. If there's
00:42:29 Speaker 09: any questions, I'm happy to answer
00:42:32 Speaker 09: them. Okay, so we'll begin with
00:42:33 Speaker 09: Councillor McLean. Good morning, Warden, and
00:42:35 Speaker 09: good morning, County Council, and to
00:42:37 Speaker 09: you, Jen. Just with regards to
00:42:39 Speaker 09: the first part, it talks about
00:42:40 Speaker 09: the future of Ray Gables. Gray
00:42:42 Speaker 09: Gables, we have had lots of
00:42:45 Speaker 09: reports going back to 2022 where
00:42:45 Speaker 09: they looked at the option of
00:42:50 Speaker 09: building a new 128 bed facility
00:42:51 Speaker 09: and the other part of creating
00:42:55 Speaker 09: the remainder older Gray Gables into
00:42:57 Speaker 09: a long term or assisted living.
00:43:01 Speaker 09: It was supposed to come back,
00:43:04 Speaker 09: it never did. I'm trying to
00:43:07 Speaker 09: think 2022 or thereabouts, and but
00:43:09 Speaker 09: we've spent money on that. Maybe
00:43:11 Speaker 09: you know that needs to be
00:43:14 Speaker 09: dusted off and brought back to
00:43:15 Speaker 09: this body or or future body
00:43:18 Speaker 09: of this horseshoe. But there was
00:43:20 Speaker 09: a lot of recommendations. in that.
00:43:23 Speaker 09: But the point I want to
00:43:24 Speaker 09: make is, when the application was
00:43:27 Speaker 09: made in November of 2019, which
00:43:29 Speaker 09: we got granted in 2020 itself,
00:43:31 Speaker 09: was to build, to get an
00:43:33 Speaker 09: additional 62 bids to build a
00:43:35 Speaker 09: new facility. It was raised here
00:43:36 Speaker 09: that I think by Councillor Greg
00:43:38 Speaker 09: that are there options of adding
00:43:40 Speaker 09: on versus building a brand new
00:43:43 Speaker 09: facility. because the part of building,
00:43:45 Speaker 09: as Councillor or Scott Mackey had
00:43:46 Speaker 09: said, you know, it's a cost.
00:43:48 Speaker 09: But I don't know has there
00:43:50 Speaker 09: had been those conversations with the
00:43:52 Speaker 09: ministry? And certainly, Rockmore Terrace has
00:43:54 Speaker 09: to be finished and and moved
00:43:55 Speaker 09: forward. But there are those beds,
00:43:56 Speaker 09: those sixty two beds, to reallocate
00:43:58 Speaker 09: those to an addition versus a
00:43:59 Speaker 09: brand new build. Do we have
00:44:02 Speaker 09: to make a new application, or
00:44:04 Speaker 09: we had some conversations about that?
00:44:06 Speaker 09: Because it's always been talked about.
00:44:07 Speaker 09: is building that fourth wing onto
00:44:09 Speaker 09: Grey Gables, and I thought there
00:44:11 Speaker 09: was a report. We've been getting
00:44:13 Speaker 09: reports back to 2016 around this
00:44:15 Speaker 09: horseshoe. It talks about the bones
00:44:18 Speaker 09: are good at Grey Gables. I
00:44:22 Speaker 09: think we all some of those
00:44:24 Speaker 09: have been here, have heard that
00:44:26 Speaker 09: the bones are good, that the
00:44:28 Speaker 09: infrastructure is good. It was commissioned
00:44:30 Speaker 09: in 1999 or 2000 thereabouts. So,
00:44:32 Speaker 09: but at the time, and I
00:44:36 Speaker 09: think we all agree, assisted living
00:44:38 Speaker 09: is certainly something that is a
00:44:40 Speaker 09: need as well. But one of
00:44:42 Speaker 09: those reports that came back did
00:44:43 Speaker 09: show. on the assisted living that
00:44:45 Speaker 09: it's a revenue generator that helps
00:44:46 Speaker 09: offset the cost of building a
00:44:48 Speaker 09: brand new 128 bed facility. With
00:44:50 Speaker 09: the point that the 62 beds
00:44:52 Speaker 09: will be funded, the remaining 66
00:44:54 Speaker 09: beds isn't funded by the province.
00:44:56 Speaker 09: But there was a report that
00:44:58 Speaker 09: showed that it was cost benefit,
00:45:00 Speaker 09: not assisted living, but these initial
00:45:01 Speaker 09: outlay of cash to build both.
00:45:03 Speaker 09: I don't know where. that conversation
00:45:05 Speaker 09: or conversations with the ministry. It
00:45:07 Speaker 09: seems to be hung up on
00:45:10 Speaker 09: the old Rockwood Terrace, and I
00:45:11 Speaker 09: think even on the old Rockwood
00:45:13 Speaker 09: Terrace there was conversations around this
00:45:15 Speaker 09: horseshoe. Different times, it would make
00:45:16 Speaker 09: a good assisted living. It would
00:45:18 Speaker 09: complement the new Rockwood Terrace, which
00:45:19 Speaker 09: is a long-term care facility. We've
00:45:21 Speaker 09: dealt with that, but that was
00:45:23 Speaker 09: some of the conversation. I think
00:45:24 Speaker 09: we would all agree. Why would
00:45:26 Speaker 09: we create another long-term care facility
00:45:27 Speaker 09: in in the area where the
00:45:28 Speaker 09: new Rockwood Terrace is to create
00:45:30 Speaker 09: competition as as Council Miller has
00:45:32 Speaker 09: said, Deputy Warden is if you're
00:45:34 Speaker 09: competing with staffing in that area,
00:45:36 Speaker 09: which I don't know why they
00:45:37 Speaker 09: don't get that, but anyway, we
00:45:39 Speaker 09: don't go there. Anyway, I'm just
00:45:41 Speaker 09: going back to the part that
00:45:43 Speaker 09: there is a report that did
00:45:44 Speaker 09: come out that talked about building
00:45:45 Speaker 09: a brand new Grey Gables in
00:45:46 Speaker 09: assisted living. But I do think
00:45:47 Speaker 09: at some point we need to
00:45:48 Speaker 09: ask a question or have some
00:45:49 Speaker 09: kind of a report by what
00:45:50 Speaker 09: does it look like to add
00:45:52 Speaker 09: the 62 beds to the current
00:45:57 Speaker 09: Grey Gables at some point in
00:45:58 Speaker 21: the future. I think that. option
00:46:00 Speaker 21: it never was, and the bids
00:46:00 Speaker 21: that were applied were never applied
00:46:02 Speaker 21: that way. Anyway, leave it at
00:46:04 Speaker 21: that. I don't know if Jen
00:46:06 Speaker 21: has more, but there's a lot
00:46:08 Speaker 21: of reports that have been there
00:46:09 Speaker 21: in the past that maybe we
00:46:11 Speaker 21: don't need to spend more money,
00:46:12 Speaker 21: but there's a lot of stuff
00:46:14 Speaker 21: there that need to be dusted
00:46:16 Speaker 21: off maybe at some point. Thank
00:46:17 Speaker 21: you. Okay, we're going to start
00:46:18 Speaker 21: with the CEO, and then to
00:46:31 Speaker 21: Director Cornell, and then of course
00:46:32 Speaker 03: we need to focus on the
00:46:34 Speaker 21: fact of what was just reported
00:46:37 Speaker 21: in this portion of of your
00:46:40 Speaker 21: report. So we really do. need
00:46:41 Speaker 21: to stay on this agenda, acknowledging
00:46:42 Speaker 21: that there's a has been a
00:46:44 Speaker 21: lot of hard work, a lot
00:46:46 Speaker 21: of contemplation, a lot of reports
00:46:47 Speaker 21: done that have supported us to
00:46:49 Speaker 21: the place where we are now
00:46:52 Speaker 21: with the long term care facilities
00:46:54 Speaker 21: that we have. So, with that,
00:46:55 Speaker 21: CAO. Okay. So, and yes, thank
00:46:57 Speaker 21: you. But, Councillor McQueen, we've already
00:46:59 Speaker 21: voted on that, so. we're not
00:47:01 Speaker 15: having further discussion on that. So,
00:47:03 Speaker 15: thank you. Appreciate the highlights again
00:47:05 Speaker 15: of all the hard work that's
00:47:08 Speaker 15: gone in and all the wealth
00:47:09 Speaker 15: of information that is provided to
00:47:11 Speaker 15: us as we make our decisions
00:47:12 Speaker 15: moving forward. So, with that, I'll
00:47:16 Speaker 15: just look to the CAO and
00:47:19 Speaker 15: Director Cornell. Through you, Warren. I
00:47:21 Speaker 15: think you just answered that. If
00:47:25 Speaker 15: that's that matter was part of
00:47:27 Speaker 15: the the previous report that was
00:47:29 Speaker 15: just passed as part of that
00:47:31 Speaker 15: motion, there is information with respect
00:47:33 Speaker 02: to some preliminary information with respect.
00:47:36 Speaker 02: to the options that have been
00:47:38 Speaker 02: analysed as part of of Gray
00:47:39 Speaker 02: Gables, and that can be found
00:47:42 Speaker 02: in the Long Term Care Committee
00:47:43 Speaker 02: Manager Report that's referenced in that
00:47:46 Speaker 02: motion that was just previously passed.
00:47:48 Speaker 02: If and so there is some
00:47:50 Speaker 02: information with respect to Gray Gables
00:47:52 Speaker 02: analysis in that report. Okay, and
00:47:53 Speaker 02: I see the director nodding her
00:47:54 Speaker 02: head. Okay, all right. Anything further
00:47:56 Speaker 02: then on the items that were
00:47:59 Speaker 02: under? that are under consideration on
00:48:01 Speaker 02: the floor right now. Okay, I'm
00:48:02 Speaker 02: not seeing any further hands go
00:48:03 Speaker 02: up. Therefore, I'll call the vote.
00:48:06 Speaker 02: Then, all those in favour, and
00:48:08 Speaker 02: that motion is carried. Thank you.
00:48:10 Speaker 02: Thank you very much, Director Cornell
00:48:13 Speaker 02: and CEO, and Deputy CEO for
00:48:15 Speaker 02: walking us through this. Although we're
00:48:16 Speaker 02: going to call on you in
00:48:19 Speaker 02: just a moment, we're going to
00:48:21 Speaker 02: do item five D now. It
00:48:23 Speaker 02: was a very long day on
00:48:25 Speaker 02: July 16th, but it was
00:48:28 Speaker 02: also a great opportunity to. to
00:48:32 Speaker 02: be there in person and see
00:48:34 Speaker 02: the progress, and it was it
00:48:36 Speaker 02: was time well spent together. So
00:48:38 Speaker 02: with that, there was a second
00:48:39 Speaker 02: portion in which the long term
00:48:40 Speaker 02: care redevelopment task force also met,
00:48:42 Speaker 02: and so it's recommended that the
00:48:49 Speaker 02: long term care redevelop the long
00:48:50 Speaker 02: term care redevelopment task force minutes
5.d Long Term Care Redevelopment Task Force minutes dated July 16, 2026
The Council adopted resolutions regarding the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment update for informational purposes. A correction was noted in the minutes to reflect accurate attendance records before discussion commenced. The report highlighted significant construction progress, including the completion of major structural elements and a successful inspection of the grounding grid. Stakeholders celebrated milestones achieved by the construction crew and consultants during a recent gathering. The project remains on budget despite seasonal challenges, with a planned transition period scheduled for early next year. Final occupancy is anticipated after operational preparations and a mandatory ministry inspection are completed.
00:48:51 Speaker 25: dated July sixteenth, twenty twenty six,
00:48:54 Speaker 25: be adopted as presented, and that
00:48:56 Speaker 25: the following resolutions contained therein be
00:48:59 Speaker 25: endorsed: that the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment
00:49:01 Speaker 25: update from Collier's project. leaders be
00:49:02 Speaker 25: received for information, and so again
00:49:04 Speaker 21: they were presenting at both of
00:49:06 Speaker 21: both the task force as well
00:49:08 Speaker 21: as the previous committee. Just before
00:49:10 Speaker 21: I look for a mover and
00:49:12 Speaker 21: a seconder, Madam Deputy Clerk, I
00:49:17 Speaker 21: understand there's a correction in the
00:49:19 Speaker 21: minute notes regarding attendance. Thank you,
00:49:21 Speaker 21: Madam Warden. Through you, I will
00:49:23 Speaker 10: note there's a correction in the
00:49:26 Speaker 10: minutes to include Councillor Greg and
00:49:28 Speaker 10: Councillor Hutchinson as not in attendance.
00:49:30 Speaker 10: Thank you. Okay. Thank you. So,
00:49:33 Speaker 10: with that clarification and that correction,
00:49:37 Speaker 10: may I ask for a mover
00:49:40 Speaker 10: and a seconder? Thank you. Moved
00:49:43 Speaker 10: by Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor
00:49:45 Speaker 10: McKay. So, it's now on the
00:49:48 Speaker 10: floor for discussion. And with that,
00:49:51 Speaker 10: I'll welcome back the Deputy CEO.
00:49:52 Speaker 10: Good morning, once again. This one,
00:49:55 Speaker 10: I suspect, will be slightly quicker.
00:49:57 Speaker 10: So, I will quickly cover some
00:49:59 Speaker 10: of the highlights from the redevelop.
00:50:01 Speaker 10: The redevelopment task force meeting. We
00:50:04 Speaker 10: did meet over lunch with members
00:50:06 Speaker 10: of committee of management and the
00:50:09 Speaker 10: redevelopment task force joining us. Malu
00:50:10 Speaker 10: Blamey, our site contractor, put on
00:50:12 Speaker 10: a barbecue to recognise significant milestones
00:50:14 Speaker 10: in the Rockwood Terrace build. To
00:50:18 Speaker 10: extend their thanks to the the
00:50:20 Speaker 10: multiple trades consultants and sub trades
00:50:22 Speaker 10: that they're working with, and the
00:50:24 Speaker 10: warden was able to offer some
00:50:25 Speaker 10: words of of. To offer some
00:50:27 Speaker 10: words of thanks to members of
00:50:28 Speaker 10: the construction crew who were able
00:50:30 Speaker 10: to join us over over the
00:50:32 Speaker 10: balance of lunchtime, the build has
00:50:35 Speaker 10: passed the fifty fifty percent completion
00:50:37 Speaker 10: mark. Earlier that day, we had
00:50:38 Speaker 10: had the fantastic news that the
00:50:40 Speaker 10: grounding grid, which had proven to
00:50:41 Speaker 10: be a little bit challenging and
00:50:43 Speaker 10: is a major step towards energising
00:50:46 Speaker 10: the building, had passed its ESA
00:50:49 Speaker 10: inspection, and and so so it
00:50:52 Speaker 10: was a good time to pause
00:50:55 Speaker 10: and celebrate. the work that had
00:50:58 Speaker 10: been done, and look ahead to
00:51:01 Speaker 10: the work that is yet to
00:51:03 Speaker 10: come. We did a tour of
00:51:05 Speaker 10: the building, which is beginning to
00:51:08 Speaker 10: look very much like a finished
00:51:09 Speaker 10: building now. And we and we
00:51:11 Speaker 10: saw significant progress since the last
00:51:15 Speaker 10: time members of committee and council
00:51:16 Speaker 10: were able to visit the building.
00:51:17 Speaker 10: So we had a good walk
00:51:18 Speaker 10: around the building, explored the various
00:51:21 Speaker 10: different resident rooms, staffing areas, and
00:51:22 Speaker 10: some of the lounge lounge spaces.
00:51:24 Speaker 10: Colliers provided us a comprehensive construction.
00:51:25 Speaker 10: The comprehensive construction update report detailing
00:51:26 Speaker 10: the advanced completion works of the
00:51:30 Speaker 10: masonry. The windows are 95, 95
00:51:33 Speaker 10: plus percent complete at that point
00:51:34 Speaker 10: in time. Framing and drywall largely
00:51:37 Speaker 10: complete across the entire building. Indeed,
00:51:39 Speaker 10: some priming paint had been done,
00:51:41 Speaker 10: and we got an opportunity to
00:51:43 Speaker 10: walk through the two mocked-up resident
00:51:45 Speaker 10: rooms, which were largely complete in
00:51:49 Speaker 10: terms of in terms of their
00:51:51 Speaker 10: mock-up, so that we can see
00:51:56 Speaker 10: the final finish of the the
00:51:58 Speaker 10: light fitting. Finish of the the
00:52:00 Speaker 10: light fittings, the door fixtures, the
00:52:02 Speaker 10: wall fixtures, and so on and
00:52:04 Speaker 10: so forth. So we were able
00:52:05 Speaker 10: to have a good wander around
00:52:07 Speaker 10: the building and see the various
00:52:10 Speaker 10: progress that has been made. Collier
00:52:13 Speaker 10: has identified that we remain on
00:52:15 Speaker 10: budget. We do have a slight
00:52:17 Speaker 10: pressure of time now on the
00:52:19 Speaker 10: building after a very difficult construction
00:52:23 Speaker 10: season during the winter. But as
00:52:26 Speaker 10: of the last schedule, we remain
00:52:27 Speaker 10: ready to take the building over
00:52:29 Speaker 10: in early 2027. with approximately a
00:52:30 Speaker 10: three to four month warming up
00:52:32 Speaker 10: phase before occupancy in April time
00:52:34 Speaker 10: of next year. And that that
00:52:38 Speaker 10: that period between us assuming the
00:52:40 Speaker 10: building and actually occupying the building
00:52:42 Speaker 10: from a long term care perspective
00:52:43 Speaker 10: is to enable us to get
00:52:45 Speaker 10: all our operational plans in place,
00:52:47 Speaker 10: train staff, onboard new staff, and
00:52:48 Speaker 10: pass the absolutely critical last in
00:52:50 Speaker 10: person ministry inspection. And that ministry
00:52:52 Speaker 10: inspection has to be scheduled. when,
00:52:53 Speaker 10: essentially, the building is fully operational
00:52:55 Speaker 10: from a staffing and a staffing
00:52:56 Speaker 10: and resource capacity perspective, so they
00:52:58 Speaker 10: can inspect it as a fully
00:53:00 Speaker 10: operational long-term care home. The only
00:53:03 Speaker 10: thing that will be missing for
00:53:05 Speaker 10: that inspection will be the residents,
00:53:06 Speaker 10: and then shortly after that, we're
00:53:08 Speaker 10: anticipating in mid-April welcoming residents to
00:53:09 Speaker 10: the long-term care home. The schedule
00:53:10 Speaker 10: continues to be a cross focus
00:53:13 Speaker 10: as we go forward of both
00:53:14 Speaker 10: the Colliers team, indeed. the Great
00:53:16 Speaker 10: County team, and the Millwall Blamey
00:53:18 Speaker 10: team, meeting on a very regular
00:53:20 Speaker 10: basis to make sure that as
00:53:21 Speaker 10: we advance that work, we're
00:53:24 Speaker 10: keeping eyes on the finishes that
00:53:27 Speaker 10: are going in. And a key
00:53:29 Speaker 10: piece that's being moved forward at
00:53:31 Speaker 10: the minute is the landscaping work.
00:53:33 Speaker 10: The site is extensive; two new
00:53:34 Speaker 10: municipal streets need to be created,
00:53:37 Speaker 10: several parking areas, a stormwater management
00:53:38 Speaker 10: pond needs to be landscaped, as
00:53:39 Speaker 10: well as the other landscaping. And
00:53:40 Speaker 10: we were able to see the
00:53:42 Speaker 10: significant work that's already been done
00:53:44 Speaker 10: in the central courtyard area. The
00:53:45 Speaker 10: central courtyard for members that were
00:53:49 Speaker 10: able to join us is is
00:53:52 Speaker 26: one of the highlights of this
00:53:56 Speaker 26: building. It really does create an
00:53:58 Speaker 26: incredibly nice space in the centre
00:54:00 Speaker 26: of the building with both recreation
00:54:03 Speaker 26: lounges overlooking the space and accessible
00:54:05 Speaker 26: pathways throughout that entire area. So
00:54:07 Speaker 26: a real a real joy to
00:54:09 Speaker 26: to see that work coming on.
00:54:10 Speaker 26: So it was a it was
00:54:11 Speaker 26: a it was a good news
00:54:13 Speaker 26: story after after a good lunch
00:54:15 Speaker 26: where we were able to
00:54:21 Speaker 26: celebrate the hard work of the
00:54:24 Speaker 26: hundreds of staff that have been
00:54:26 Speaker 26: working on the. site to make
00:54:28 Speaker 26: it come to fruition, and I'll
00:54:29 Speaker 26: be happy to take questions. Okay,
00:54:31 Speaker 26: thank you. So, any questions on
00:54:33 Speaker 26: this report, this report, these minutes?
00:54:35 Speaker 26: Okay, all right then. I'm not
00:54:37 Speaker 26: seeing any questions. So, all those
00:54:40 Speaker 26: in favour, and that motion
00:54:42 Speaker 26: is carried. Thank you. We do
00:54:45 Speaker 26: not have any closed session matters
00:54:47 Speaker 26: to deal with on our council
00:54:49 Speaker 26: agenda this morning, nor reports that
00:54:54 Speaker 26: allows us to go to the.
8 By-laws
Council considered six specific bylaws addressing infrastructure financing, land easements for the CP Rail Trail, medical programme agreements, and wildlife control measures. The assembly approved legislation to authorise borrowing from Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, grant easements on the Eco Parkway, amend a memorandum of understanding with Rural Ontario Medical Programme, remove nuisance beavers, and control coyotes or wolves. Councillors moved and seconded the motion for unanimous passage, sealing these documents into the official bylaw book.
00:54:57 Speaker 26: bylaws. We do have a number
00:54:59 Speaker 26: of them. That there are actually
00:55:02 Speaker 26: six bylaws. So it is recommended
00:55:04 Speaker 26: that bylaws 5296262530126 be inclusive, be
00:55:08 Speaker 26: introduced and taken at as read
00:55:10 Speaker 26: a first, second, and third time.
00:55:13 Speaker 26: Finally, passed, signed by the warden
00:55:14 Speaker 26: and the clerk, sealed with the
00:55:16 Speaker 26: seal of the corporation, and engrossed
00:55:18 Speaker 26: into the bylaw book. First one
00:55:19 Speaker 26: is 529626, which is a bylaw
00:55:21 Speaker 26: to authorise the submission of an
00:55:24 Speaker 26: application. of to Ontario Infrastructure and
00:55:26 Speaker 26: Lands Corporation for financing of certain
00:55:28 Speaker 26: capital works and to authorise long-term
00:55:30 Speaker 26: borrowing for such capital works through
00:55:32 Speaker 26: the issue of debentures to OILC.
00:55:34 Speaker 26: Next one is 529726, a bylaw
00:55:36 Speaker 26: to authorise the granting of an
00:55:39 Speaker 26: easement and to authorise a donation
00:55:41 Speaker 26: agreement to convey lands forming part
00:55:43 Speaker 26: of the CP Rail Trail, the
00:55:45 Speaker 26: Eco Parkway. Number three is bylaw
00:55:47 Speaker 26: fifty two ninety eight twenty six,
00:55:49 Speaker 26: a bylaw to authorise the warden
00:55:51 Speaker 26: and clerk to execute an amendment
00:55:57 Speaker 26: to the memorandum of understanding between
00:56:01 Speaker 26: the County of Grey and the
00:56:04 Speaker 26: City of Owen Sound and the
00:56:06 Speaker 26: Rural Ontario Medical Programme. And I,
00:56:09 Speaker 27: the fourth item is fifty two
00:56:12 Speaker 27: ninety nine twenty six, a bylaw
00:56:14 Speaker 27: to provide for the removal of
00:56:17 Speaker 27: the nuisance beaver of nuisance beaver
00:56:18 Speaker 27: and fifty three zero zero twenty
00:56:21 Speaker 28: six, a bylaw to provide the
00:56:24 Speaker 28: for the To provide for the
00:56:25 Speaker 28: control of coyotes and or wolves,
00:56:27 Speaker 28: and fifty three oh one twenty
00:56:31 Speaker 28: six bylaw to confirm all actions
00:56:36 Speaker 28: and proceedings of council. May I
00:56:38 Speaker 28: ask for a mover and a
00:56:40 Speaker 28: seconder? Moved by Councillor Gregg, seconded
00:56:42 Speaker 28: by Councillor Patterson. It's now on
00:56:45 Speaker 28: the floor for any discussion. Councillor
00:56:49 Speaker 28: Eccles. Thank you. Bylaw, it's one
00:56:55 Speaker 29: to do with Southgate and CP
00:57:01 Speaker 29: Rail lands. In our committee as
00:57:03 Speaker 29: a whole, we have another report
00:57:05 Speaker 29: that there's more land. Is when
00:57:06 Speaker 02: we combine them together, or is
00:57:07 Speaker 02: it's going to be a monthly
00:57:09 Speaker 02: thing? There that there'll be an
00:57:10 Speaker 02: exchange of CP rail land in
00:57:12 Speaker 02: Dundalk for Southgate, or is there
00:57:15 Speaker 02: a bit of a bulk buying
00:57:16 Speaker 02: here so that we don't
00:57:19 Speaker 02: need a bylaw every week or
00:57:20 Speaker 02: month to transfer land? just it's
00:57:22 Speaker 02: curious that yeah we're doing a
00:57:26 Speaker 02: bylaw to transfer lands and then
00:57:28 Speaker 02: we're going to talk about another
00:57:29 Speaker 02: bylaw to transfer another little bit
00:57:30 Speaker 02: of land. Wow, I guess that's
00:57:33 Speaker 02: government duplicity, isn't it? Okay, well
00:57:34 Speaker 30: they usually cut me off. Thank
00:57:35 Speaker 30: you. or a matter of looking
00:57:38 Speaker 30: after details and making sure that
00:57:40 Speaker 30: we're dotting all of our eyes
00:57:42 Speaker 30: and crossing all of our t's.
00:57:44 Speaker 30: So I do know that Director
00:57:47 Speaker 30: Taylor would like to speak, but
00:57:49 Speaker 30: perhaps okay. So we're going to
00:57:50 Speaker 30: begin with with the content answer,
00:57:54 Speaker 30: and then I'll look to the
00:57:56 Speaker 30: clerk for any procedural clarification. Director
00:57:58 Speaker 30: Taylor, good morning. Early, good morning
00:58:00 Speaker 30: to you, because we're not we're
00:58:02 Speaker 30: not just before lunch. Thank you,
00:58:04 Speaker 30: thank you, Madam Warden, and good
00:58:06 Speaker 30: morning to you and members of
00:58:08 Speaker 30: County Council and those tuning in.
00:58:09 Speaker 30: thank you for the the comments,
00:58:10 Speaker 30: Councillor Eccles. This one is a
00:58:12 Speaker 30: little confusing because we have had
00:58:15 Speaker 30: a bunch of changes in Southgate.
00:58:16 Speaker 30: Council may recall that there was
00:58:18 Speaker 30: a report back in February that
00:58:20 Speaker 30: looked at four crossings of the
00:58:22 Speaker 30: CP Rail Trail: two up up
00:58:23 Speaker 30: in in sort of the north
00:58:25 Speaker 30: end of Dundalk, close to the
00:58:27 Speaker 30: new school site, and and two
00:58:28 Speaker 30: along the the proposed Eco Parkway
00:58:30 Speaker 30: road expansion. In that regard, the
00:58:32 Speaker 30: report that came to committee the
00:58:36 Speaker 30: whole. three weeks ago was essentially
00:58:39 Speaker 30: to add on to those two
00:58:41 Speaker 30: southerly crossings and also include a
00:58:46 Speaker 30: water main easement. So that's what's
00:58:49 Speaker 30: before you today on the council
00:58:50 Speaker 30: agenda. But you're quite right; there
00:58:52 Speaker 26: is a separate report on the
00:58:56 Speaker 26: committee the whole agenda later today
00:58:58 Speaker 26: dealing with a potential land swap,
00:58:59 Speaker 26: if we can call it that,
00:59:01 Speaker 26: in in sort of the the
00:59:04 Speaker 26: heart of Dundalk, with respect to
00:59:05 Speaker 07: some lands potentially going from the
00:59:09 Speaker 07: county to the the township and
00:59:12 Speaker 07: vice versa. So it is just
00:59:14 Speaker 07: sort of a coincidence of timing.
00:59:16 Speaker 07: that all this came together at
00:59:17 Speaker 07: the same time, but they are
00:59:20 Speaker 07: sort of two separate and distinct
00:59:25 Speaker 07: matters, and and the the individual
00:59:28 Speaker 07: agreements associated with with both have
00:59:29 Speaker 26: have different requirements that we've worked
00:59:31 Speaker 26: closely with township staff and our
00:59:35 Speaker 26: own legal services staff. So, okay,
00:59:37 Speaker 26: thank you, and Madam Clerk. Okay,
00:59:42 Speaker 26: so she has no nothing further
00:59:43 Speaker 26: to add to that. Any further
00:59:45 Speaker 26: discussion, Councillor Greg? if I could,
00:59:46 Speaker 26: I'd just like to compliment staff
00:59:47 Speaker 26: on what is a very good
00:59:51 Speaker 26: outcome on the new nuisance bylaw
00:59:52 Speaker 31: for beavers and coyotes. I think
00:59:54 Speaker 31: he did an excellent job consulting
00:59:56 Speaker 31: across broad sectors of the community
00:59:58 Speaker 31: and Ministry of Natural Resources and
01:00:00 Speaker 31: other various interested parties and landed
01:00:02 Speaker 31: today with the passage of what
01:00:03 Speaker 31: is a very good bylaw for
01:00:06 Speaker 31: for the county to adopt and
01:00:07 Speaker 31: try moving forward. Thank. you. Anything
01:00:09 Speaker 31: further? Okay, so this is a
01:00:11 Speaker 31: vote on the bylaws. All those
01:00:12 Speaker 31: in favour, and that motion is
9 News and Celebrations
Council members announced upcoming community events including a canvas artwork reveal at Gray Roots Museum on August 26 and the 51st annual Summerfolk Music and Craft Festival at Castle Beach this weekend. A special service will honour George Stevenson and the dedication of World War II memorial windows at Christ Church Anglican on August 15, featuring a recovered Hurricane Hawker propeller. The Markdale Fall Fair begins August 29 at the Markdale Arena, followed by the Hopeville Kite Festival on August 29 and 30 south of Gray Road Nine.
01:00:14 Speaker 31: carried. News and celebrations. Are we
01:00:15 Speaker 31: beginning with anything from staff? One.
01:00:16 Speaker 31: Yep. I think Director Myers, why
01:00:17 Speaker 31: don't you just shine a little
01:00:18 Speaker 31: light on one of the activities
01:00:20 Speaker 31: that we have coming up at
01:00:21 Speaker 31: Gray Roots before we open it
01:00:23 Speaker 31: to the council floor? Excellent. Thank
01:00:24 Speaker 31: you, Orin. Good morning. Excellent, thank
01:00:28 Speaker 31: you, and good morning, County Council.
01:00:29 Speaker 21: On your desks, you have an
01:00:31 Speaker 21: invitation to the upcoming community canvas
01:00:32 Speaker 21: artwork reveal. That'll be hosted in
01:00:35 Speaker 21: about two weeks on Wednesday, August
01:00:36 Speaker 21: 26, from two to three p.m.
01:00:38 Speaker 21: It's at Gray Roots Museum and
01:00:40 Speaker 21: Archives. We have had the real
01:00:41 Speaker 21: pleasure of working with Roger Munkin
01:00:43 Speaker 21: on a Roger Munkin experience for
01:00:45 Speaker 21: this one, as well as two
01:00:46 Speaker 21: local artists. So we've been building
01:00:49 Speaker 21: a community canvas with members of
01:00:54 Speaker 21: the public coming to write on
01:00:56 Speaker 32: it and to leave messages as
01:00:58 Speaker 32: well. So there's still a little
01:01:01 Speaker 32: bit of time to do that
01:01:04 Speaker 32: if anyone is interested. But we
01:01:05 Speaker 32: will formally. unveil it on August
01:01:09 Speaker 32: 26, and we would love to
01:01:11 Speaker 32: see you there if you're available.
01:01:12 Speaker 32: Thanks. Okay, thank you. Always something
01:01:15 Speaker 32: going on at Gray Roots. For
01:01:17 Speaker 32: the first time, my granddaughter and
01:01:21 Speaker 32: I were able to ride the
01:01:24 Speaker 32: special train, so we're we were
01:01:26 Speaker 32: very delighted to be there for
01:01:27 Speaker 32: that special event. Always members of
01:01:32 Speaker 32: the public check what's happening because
01:01:36 Speaker 32: there's always something to do for
01:01:38 Speaker 32: all ages at Gray Roots. Okay,
01:01:40 Speaker 33: so with that, then I'll open
01:01:41 Speaker 33: it up to the council floor.
01:01:42 Speaker 33: We'll begin with alternate. councillor Capkay.
01:01:44 Speaker 33: Good morning, Council, and thank you,
01:01:47 Speaker 33: Warden, for the opportunity to extend
01:01:49 Speaker 33: a warm welcome to those attending
01:01:52 Speaker 33: the 51st annual Summerfolk Music and
01:01:54 Speaker 33: Craft Festival, taking place at Castle
01:01:55 Speaker 33: Beach at Naywash Park and Owen
01:01:58 Speaker 33: Sound on this weekend. Artisans from
01:02:00 Speaker 33: all over will showcase their talents.
01:02:02 Speaker 33: There will be lots of musical
01:02:03 Speaker 33: entertainment, including the Arrogant Worms and
01:02:05 Speaker 33: our own Tanglefoot, and there's a
01:02:07 Speaker 33: large children's area. Something for everyone
01:02:08 Speaker 33: of all ages. I invite you
01:02:11 Speaker 33: to attend Summerfolk this weekend in
01:02:13 Speaker 33: Old Sound, and hopefully it doesn't
01:02:15 Speaker 33: rain. Okay, thank you, and we'll
01:02:17 Speaker 33: go to Councillor Keaveny. Thank you,
01:02:20 Speaker 33: Madam Warden, and good morning, everyone.
01:02:23 Speaker 33: And just like there's always something
01:02:25 Speaker 33: going on at Gray Roots, there's
01:02:28 Speaker 33: always something going on in Meadford.
01:02:31 Speaker 33: So this Saturday, August the fifteenth,
01:02:32 Speaker 33: there's a very special event at
01:02:34 Speaker 33: Christ Church Anglican. It's the 80th
01:02:35 Speaker 33: anniversary of the dedication of the
01:02:37 Speaker 33: World War II memorial windows, and
01:02:39 Speaker 33: this is a really special story
01:02:40 Speaker 33: where Bishop Harold Yapleyard went across
01:02:43 Speaker 33: to Europe and collected glass from
01:02:45 Speaker 33: bombed churches and brought it back
01:02:47 Speaker 33: to create the windows at the
01:02:49 Speaker 33: Anglican Church, and it's quite a
01:02:51 Speaker 33: tourist attraction. As well, that day
01:02:53 Speaker 33: there will be a special service
01:02:54 Speaker 33: in memory of George Stevenson, who
01:02:56 Speaker 33: was the first Anglican to go
01:02:58 Speaker 33: across to World War. Cross to
01:02:59 Speaker 33: World War Two and be killed.
01:03:01 Speaker 33: So, the story is that his
01:03:06 Speaker 33: nephew actually found at a pub
01:03:09 Speaker 33: in Scotland, outside the door, a
01:03:11 Speaker 33: propeller from the plane that his
01:03:12 Speaker 34: uncle actually flew, and that was
01:03:14 Speaker 34: a Hurricane Hawker, and the propeller
01:03:15 Speaker 34: was being used as an umbrella
01:03:17 Speaker 34: stand. So now that has been
01:03:20 Speaker 34: brought back to the church, and
01:03:23 Speaker 34: there will be a dedication for
01:03:24 Speaker 34: that on Saturday, and they will
01:03:25 Speaker 34: also be celebrating the hundredth anniversary
01:03:27 Speaker 34: of the Branch Thirty Two. Of
01:03:28 Speaker 34: the Branch 32 Legion in Mifflin,
01:03:30 Speaker 34: so there will be a dinner
01:03:36 Speaker 34: as well in the evening, as
01:03:43 Speaker 34: a ceremony at the cenotaph Saturday
01:03:45 Speaker 35: morning in honour of the Legion's
01:03:47 Speaker 16: 100th anniversary. So it's a big
01:03:52 Speaker 16: day in Mifflin, and those of
01:03:55 Speaker 16: us travelling to Amol on Saturday
01:03:57 Speaker 16: are sorry to miss it. But
01:03:59 Speaker 16: in any event, that will be
01:04:01 Speaker 16: happening. Thank you. Thank you. Anything
01:04:03 Speaker 16: else? We'll go to Councillor Nielsen.
01:04:06 Speaker 16: Thank you very much, Ward Matrosov.
01:04:08 Speaker 16: While Owen Sound is already thinking
01:04:12 Speaker 16: about summer folk, Grey Highlands is
01:04:14 Speaker 16: already starting to plan our first
01:04:16 Speaker 16: of three fall fairs. The first
01:04:18 Speaker 16: fall fair will be happening August
01:04:21 Speaker 16: 29th at the Markdale Arena. The
01:04:24 Speaker 16: Markdale Arena does have portions that
01:04:26 Speaker 16: are open, so it's going to
01:04:31 Speaker 16: be indoors and outdoors. But all
01:04:33 Speaker 16: are welcome as always as we
01:04:36 Speaker 36: start the fall fair season. Thank
01:04:37 Speaker 36: you very much. Hey, thank you.
01:04:39 Speaker 36: Okay, anything else? All right. Oh,
01:04:41 Speaker 26: Councillor Debrine. Thank you, and through
01:04:43 Speaker 26: you. And while the Markdale Fall
01:04:46 Speaker 26: Fair is on August twenty ninth,
01:04:52 Speaker 26: thirtieth, the Hopeville Kite Festival is
01:05:01 Speaker 26: also on August twenty ninth and
01:05:02 Speaker 26: thirtieth. It will be from twelve
01:05:03 Speaker 26: till five both days, and it
01:05:05 Speaker 26: is located this year just south
01:05:07 Speaker 26: of Gray Road Nine on Southgate
01:05:09 Speaker 26: Road Fifteen. So it is a
01:05:10 Speaker 26: free entry event. free will donation
01:05:13 Speaker 26: to to support our local food
01:05:15 Speaker 26: bank, but it is we're in
01:05:16 Speaker 26: for a treat. The professional flyers
01:05:17 Speaker 26: are coming in from all over,
01:05:32 Speaker 26: including Ohio, Belize, Quebec, just to
01:05:33 Speaker 03: name a few. So hope to
01:05:36 Speaker 02: see some people out and enjoy
01:05:38 Speaker 02: some quiet time. Okay, thank you
01:05:39 Speaker 02: very much. Lots to do. All
01:05:42 Speaker 02: right. So with that, then we
01:05:43 Speaker 02: will look for a. motion to
01:05:46 Speaker 02: adjourn. Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded
01:05:49 Speaker 02: by the Deputy Warden. Any discussion?
01:05:51 Speaker 02: All those in favour? And the
01:05:52 Speaker 02: council portion is adjourned. And let
01:05:55 Speaker 02: me just well, the technology is
01:05:57 Speaker 02: trading over. Okay, so we are
01:06:01 Speaker 02: going to be having our lunch
01:06:02 Speaker 02: at twelve fifteen. I would like
01:06:04 Speaker 02: us to proceed in. Like us
01:06:05 Speaker 02: to proceed into committee. The whole
01:06:09 Speaker 37: to identify the items that that
01:06:13 Speaker 37: may be pulled from the consent
01:06:14 Speaker 37: agenda, so staff have time have
01:06:18 Speaker 37: time to prepare to come forward.
01:06:22 Speaker 37: So once we get to that
01:06:32 Speaker 37: portion of committee, the whole, we'll
01:06:33 Speaker 37: call a break. Okay. So I'd
01:06:36 Speaker 37: like to call to order this
01:06:38 Speaker 26: committee. The whole. of August thirteenth,
01:06:40 Speaker 26: twenty twenty-six. At this point in
01:06:42 Speaker 26: time, I'll put out a call
01:06:43 Speaker 26: if there are any declarations of
01:06:44 Speaker 26: interest. Seeing no hands raised, we'll
01:06:46 Speaker 26: move on. Business arising from minutes,
01:06:49 Speaker 26: we have healthy discussion on minutes.
01:06:51 Speaker 26: Delegations, we do not have any
01:06:52 Speaker 26: today, and so we'll go to
01:06:54 Speaker 26: item five: determination of items requiring
01:06:57 Speaker 26: separate discussion on the consent agenda
01:06:59 Speaker 26: listed in six. We have seven
01:07:01 Speaker 26: different items listed, so I'll ask
01:07:05 Speaker 26: if you. could identify any items
01:07:07 Speaker 26: you wish to have a separate
01:07:09 Speaker 26: discussion for. Councillor Gray, 6C, just
01:07:11 Speaker 26: for point of a question. Thanks.
01:07:12 Speaker 26: So, question for 6C, so we'll
01:07:14 Speaker 26: pull that one separately. Anything else,
01:07:15 Speaker 26: Councillor McLean? Thank you, Madam Warden.
01:19:34 Speaker 26: Yes, 6F. Okay, 6F. Anything else?
01:19:35 Speaker 26: Okay, I'm not seeing any further
01:19:53 Speaker 26: hands. Therefore, we'll just tidy up
01:19:54 Speaker 26: then the consent agenda. It's recommended
01:19:56 Speaker 26: that the following consent agenda items
01:19:58 Speaker 26: be received, and that staff be
01:20:01 Speaker 26: authorised to take actions necessary to
01:20:03 Speaker 26: give effect to the recommendations in
01:20:04 Speaker 26: the staff reports, and that the
01:20:06 Speaker 26: correspondence be supported or received
01:20:09 Speaker 26: for information as recommended in the
01:20:11 Speaker 26: consent agenda. It will be all
01:20:13 Speaker 26: items less item 6C as in
01:20:16 Speaker 26: cat and F as in frog.
01:20:17 Speaker 26: May I ask for mover to
01:20:20 Speaker 26: seconder? Move. Moved by Councillor Eccles,
01:20:21 Speaker 26: seconded by Councillor Mackie. Any discussion?
01:20:23 Speaker 26: All those in favour? And that
01:20:25 Speaker 26: motion is carried. Thank you. So
01:20:26 Speaker 26: let's take a break now until
01:20:26 Speaker 26: 11:10, and then we'll carry on
01:20:29 Speaker 26: with the remainder of our agenda
01:20:31 Speaker 26: in the morning and see where
01:20:32 Speaker 26: we are by 12:15. Could I
01:20:37 Speaker 26: please invite all of our committee,
01:20:39 Speaker 26: the whole members, back to the
01:20:42 Speaker 26: horseshoe? Okay, so we are reconvening
01:20:46 Speaker 38: after our break, and we are
01:20:49 Speaker 38: at item seven a, and this
01:20:52 Speaker 38: is with regards to
01:20:54 Speaker 38: community services committee minutes. And in
01:20:56 Speaker 38: a moment, we'll call up Director
01:20:58 Speaker 38: Shaw to speak to that.
01:21:01 Speaker 38: So it's recommended that the community
01:21:04 Speaker 38: services committee minutes dated August six,
01:21:06 Speaker 38: twenty twenty six, be adopted as
01:21:07 Speaker 38: presented, and that the following resolutions
01:21:11 Speaker 38: contained therein be endorsed. There are
01:21:13 Speaker 38: a number of them that have
01:21:14 Speaker 38: been. outlined and highlighted here in
01:21:16 Speaker 38: the circulated agenda that's been made
01:21:18 Speaker 38: public and circulated to all committee,
01:21:20 Speaker 38: the whole members. So at this
01:21:22 Speaker 38: point in time, I will look
01:21:25 Speaker 38: for a mover and a seconder.
01:21:26 Speaker 38: Got a move by Councillor Hutchison,
01:21:32 Speaker 38: second by Councillor Dovring. So it's
01:21:33 Speaker 38: now on the floor for discussion.
01:21:34 Speaker 38: Welcome, Director Shaw. Thank you, Madam
01:21:36 Speaker 38: Warden, and good morning, County Council.
01:21:39 Speaker 38: Starting off with the first recommendation,
01:21:41 Speaker 38: it is our community's. Our community
01:21:42 Speaker 38: services systems planning and compliance analyst
01:21:44 Speaker 38: position. The Ministry of Education has
01:21:48 Speaker 38: a provincially mandated modernization initiatives over
01:21:50 Speaker 38: the next five years. They're looking
01:21:54 Speaker 38: at increasing requirements for IT modernization,
01:21:57 Speaker 38: data management, compliance monitoring, and performance
01:21:59 Speaker 38: measures. This is actually a really
01:22:02 Speaker 38: good news story. We do not
01:22:03 Speaker 38: have a centralized waitlist for childcare
01:22:06 Speaker 38: in anywhere in the province, and
01:22:09 Speaker 38: so right now, majority of people
01:22:11 Speaker 38: that are looking for childcare would
01:22:11 Speaker 38: have to put an application
01:22:14 Speaker 38: into all of the existing childcare
01:22:17 Speaker 38: centres out there, rather than having
01:22:20 Speaker 38: one centralized area to do it.
01:22:21 Speaker 38: There are many other options when
01:22:23 Speaker 38: it comes to early on programmemes.
01:22:25 Speaker 38: Standardizing, taking, scanning people in and
01:22:31 Speaker 38: out of the programmemes. So there's
01:22:31 Speaker 38: a lot of that other security
01:22:34 Speaker 38: and safety aspects of it. The
01:22:37 Speaker 38: province is looking at this taking
01:22:39 Speaker 38: about three to five years, and
01:22:41 Speaker 38: there are five different phases. The
01:22:43 Speaker 38: first phase is starting this September
01:22:45 Speaker 38: and will continue on until September
01:22:48 Speaker 38: of 2027. And that is again
01:22:50 Speaker 38: modernizing our early on. We are
01:22:52 Speaker 38: looking at a position in order
01:22:54 Speaker 38: to do this. The position itself
01:22:56 Speaker 38: is proposed to to also expand
01:22:57 Speaker 38: to all of our services and
01:22:59 Speaker 38: community services. So, for instance, in
01:23:04 Speaker 38: 2027, we're going to have a
01:23:05 Speaker 38: review under the MMNH. So, I'm
01:23:06 Speaker 38: sure there's going to be modernization
01:23:09 Speaker 38: recommendations coming from that, and also
01:23:11 Speaker 38: our housing and homelessness plan. So
01:23:14 Speaker 38: developing and dashboards and having a
01:23:18 Speaker 38: way of us to report on
01:23:22 Speaker 38: a number of our initiatives. Along
01:23:24 Speaker 38: with this comes increased data collection
01:23:26 Speaker 38: from the province, and as part
01:23:27 Speaker 38: of the Sea Well programme, we
01:23:29 Speaker 38: are now asking our childcare centres
01:23:31 Speaker 38: to put together business plans and
01:23:32 Speaker 38: do a lot of financial work
01:23:34 Speaker 38: and. auditing that didn't happen in
01:23:36 Speaker 38: the past, and this position will
01:23:38 Speaker 38: also help some of our smaller
01:23:38 Speaker 38: smaller centres in order to meet
01:23:40 Speaker 38: those regulatory requirements. Now from from
01:23:46 Speaker 38: the province, the funding we did
01:23:48 Speaker 38: receive funding from the Ministry of
01:23:51 Speaker 39: Education in order to assist with
01:23:52 Speaker 39: that. We received forty six thousand
01:23:54 Speaker 39: dollars for two thousand and twenty
01:23:55 Speaker 39: six, but that is prorated. There
01:23:59 Speaker 39: will be a different amount coming
01:24:00 Speaker 39: for twenty twenty seven, and we
01:24:03 Speaker 39: also received some additional funding.
01:24:05 Speaker 39: Some additional funds and early
01:24:09 Speaker 39: on for next year, also as
01:24:13 Speaker 38: administrative funds. The position itself will
01:24:15 Speaker 38: be looking at salary, benefits, supplies,
01:24:18 Speaker 38: materials, travel, a computer, cell phone,
01:24:19 Speaker 38: all of that around the hundred
01:24:22 Speaker 38: and fifty thousand dollars. So there
01:24:25 Speaker 38: are no levy dollars at this
01:24:28 Speaker 38: point going into it.
01:24:31 Speaker 38: And if at some time in
01:24:33 Speaker 38: the next five years it is
01:24:35 Speaker 38: required, we do have mitigation funds
01:24:36 Speaker 38: that we could use for that.
01:24:38 Speaker 38: And I'm happy to. answer questions
01:24:40 Speaker 38: about that. Or would you like
01:24:42 Speaker 38: me to continue with them all,
01:24:43 Speaker 38: Madam Warden? Let me see. Why
01:24:45 Speaker 38: don't we let's try to contain
01:24:47 Speaker 38: our discussion. So let's go ahead
01:24:51 Speaker 38: and just present everything, and we'll
01:24:53 Speaker 38: just we'll zero back to what
01:24:56 Speaker 38: it is people would like to
01:24:57 Speaker 38: talk to you. Thank you. Thank
01:24:59 Speaker 38: you. So the next one on
01:25:02 Speaker 38: the list is our Canada Ontario
01:25:05 Speaker 38: Community Housing Initiatives in Ontario. priorities,
01:25:06 Speaker 38: housing initiatives, investment plans. These are
01:25:08 Speaker 38: 100% provincial funded. We did receive
01:25:10 Speaker 38: our allocation for this year. Normally,
01:25:12 Speaker 38: we do have it before budget,
01:25:14 Speaker 38: but this year and last year,
01:25:16 Speaker 38: we did not. These funds are
01:25:19 Speaker 38: to protect the long-term viability of
01:25:21 Speaker 38: community housing by supporting ongoing repairs,
01:25:23 Speaker 38: supporting end-of-operating agreements, and expanding the
01:25:25 Speaker 38: stock. We normally work. with our
01:25:27 Speaker 38: nonprofits with these funds too, in
01:25:29 Speaker 38: order to provide any capital repair
01:25:31 Speaker 38: funds that might be available to
01:25:32 Speaker 38: them. As part of the national
01:25:35 Speaker 38: housing strategy, we also have a
01:25:39 Speaker 38: requirement of fifteen new units in
01:25:41 Speaker 38: order to meet the funding requirements
01:25:43 Speaker 38: for the province. We are proposing
01:25:47 Speaker 38: to keep our rent supplement programme
01:25:49 Speaker 38: going. Right now, we have forty-five
01:25:51 Speaker 38: rent supplements that we provide, and
01:25:54 Speaker 38: we're going to add two new
01:25:57 Speaker 38: rent or twelve new rent supplements
01:25:58 Speaker 38: as a total. towards that fifteen,
01:26:00 Speaker 38: we're looking at five hundred thousand
01:26:02 Speaker 38: dollars towards our capital build in
01:26:04 Speaker 38: Dundalk, and that would provide for
01:26:10 Speaker 38: three new units. And of course,
01:26:12 Speaker 38: our community housing repairs funds at
01:26:14 Speaker 38: about three hundred and thirteen, and
01:26:16 Speaker 38: those would go towards funding needs
01:26:17 Speaker 38: in ourselves, emergency funding needs, or
01:26:18 Speaker 38: funding needs for our nonprofits. Part
01:26:20 Speaker 38: of our priority housing would be
01:26:23 Speaker 38: our rental supplements again, and we
01:26:25 Speaker 38: also put a ten percent allocation
01:26:27 Speaker 38: to be used towards support services.
01:26:29 Speaker 38: ten percent is the highest that
01:26:31 Speaker 38: we can go according to that
01:26:34 Speaker 38: fund. Our next item is Garifraxa
01:26:35 Speaker 38: Nonprofit Homes. These are one of
01:26:36 Speaker 38: our nine nonprofits that we support.
01:26:40 Speaker 38: So through the Housing Services Act,
01:26:41 Speaker 38: we have a number of not-for-profits
01:26:42 Speaker 38: that the county supports, and these
01:26:44 Speaker 38: are one of them. They had
01:26:45 Speaker 38: a sinkhole in their parking lot
01:26:47 Speaker 21: as part of all that rain
01:26:49 Speaker 21: we had back in April and.
01:26:54 Speaker 21: there were needs repair needs for
01:26:59 Speaker 21: the retaining wall and also for
01:27:03 Speaker 21: the driveway itself. We the repairs
01:27:04 Speaker 21: are costing two hundred and seventy-five
01:27:08 Speaker 21: thousand dollars. They do have some
01:27:13 Speaker 21: funds available, but they also have
01:27:14 Speaker 27: other capital needs that are coming
01:27:17 Speaker 27: up. So they approached the county
01:27:20 Speaker 27: to see if we could provide
01:27:24 Speaker 27: any extra any funding towards it.
01:27:27 Speaker 27: We we proposed one hundred and
01:27:28 Speaker 27: twenty-five thousand dollars. We have seventy-five
01:27:32 Speaker 27: thousand dollars that we're going to.
01:27:37 Speaker 27: use from our nonprofit housing general
01:27:39 Speaker 27: reserve and fifty thousand dollars from
01:27:40 Speaker 27: the Cochi initiatives that I just
01:27:43 Speaker 27: talked about. And I'm happy to
01:27:45 Speaker 27: answer any questions. Okay, thank you.
01:27:47 Speaker 40: So I'll put it out. If
01:27:49 Speaker 40: there are any questions from members
01:27:50 Speaker 40: of the committee, the whole, perhaps
01:27:52 Speaker 40: you can refer to if it's
01:27:55 Speaker 40: item one, two, or three to
01:27:56 Speaker 40: help clarify, and then we'll look
01:27:59 Speaker 40: into that. Any questions? Okay, we'll
01:28:01 Speaker 40: begin with Councillor Apples. And through
01:28:03 Speaker 40: you, Madam Warden, and probably to
01:28:06 Speaker 40: Terad, has really nothing to do
01:28:08 Speaker 40: with your report whatsoever, Emery. It
01:28:10 Speaker 40: has to do with just procedural.
01:28:11 Speaker 40: I noticed at the end of
01:28:13 Speaker 40: the meeting, the meeting was adjourned
01:28:18 Speaker 40: by Councillor DeBree, made the motion,
01:28:22 Speaker 40: and the chair seconded the motion.
01:28:26 Speaker 40: Procedurally, can the chair move and
01:28:28 Speaker 40: second? The chair move in second
01:28:30 Speaker 34: motions, and that's why I'm looking
01:28:32 Speaker 34: towards Tara and Marie, not you.
01:28:38 Speaker 34: Okay, I'll look to Madam Clerk.
01:28:43 Speaker 34: Thank you, and through you, Madam
01:28:44 Speaker 34: Morgan. I do not know the
01:28:46 Speaker 21: answer to that offhand. It's certainly
01:28:49 Speaker 41: something that I can look into.
01:28:51 Speaker 41: I did glance our procedural bylaw,
01:28:55 Speaker 41: and it's it doesn't speak to
01:28:56 Speaker 41: that. So I think the answer
01:29:04 Speaker 41: is probably somewhere in Roberts' Rules
01:29:05 Speaker 41: of Order. I know. that our
01:29:07 Speaker 42: procedure bylaw, though it doesn't speak
01:29:08 Speaker 42: to it, some municipalities, the chair,
01:29:11 Speaker 42: I believe, their procedure bylaw allows
01:29:13 Speaker 42: for the chair to adjourn meetings,
01:29:15 Speaker 21: but it is unclear to me
01:29:17 Speaker 21: what proper protocol would be in
01:29:19 Speaker 21: our in our circumstances. So I
01:29:20 Speaker 21: can certainly look into that. I
01:29:21 Speaker 21: think we we would have fun
01:29:24 Speaker 21: looking into that for you. Okay,
01:29:27 Speaker 21: thank you, Councillor Nielsen. Thank you
01:29:31 Speaker 21: for. Thank you very much, Ward
01:29:34 Speaker 21: Mustafa, to Councillor Eccles. If my
01:29:39 Speaker 21: motion to adjourn was incorrect, I
01:29:41 Speaker 21: apologize for the world record of
01:29:42 Speaker 21: the longest community services committee, as
01:29:43 Speaker 21: it is still currently running. Thank
01:29:45 Speaker 21: you. Anything else, Councillor McQueen? Just
01:29:46 Speaker 21: to follow up to the question,
01:29:50 Speaker 21: I know with procedure, I know
01:29:52 Speaker 21: with Grey Highlands, we allow the
01:29:53 Speaker 21: chair to second, but. won't allow
01:29:55 Speaker 43: the chair to move. So you
01:29:57 Speaker 43: may be the meeting may be
01:29:59 Speaker 43: over with. Thank you. Okay, so
01:30:01 Speaker 43: if there's no further discussion or
01:30:20 Speaker 43: questions for Director Shaw, I'll call
01:30:22 Speaker 43: the question. Then all those in
01:30:24 Speaker 44: favour. That motion is carried. Thank
01:30:29 Speaker 43: you very much, Director Shaw. Okay,
01:30:35 Speaker 43: so we're going to move on
01:30:36 Speaker 43: now to item seven B, and
01:30:38 Speaker 43: in fact, we're going to in.
01:30:40 Speaker 43: 7B, C, and D, we're going
01:30:41 Speaker 43: to see a lot of Director
01:30:43 Speaker 43: McNabb. So let's get started on
01:30:45 Speaker 43: on this part here. The first
01:30:46 Speaker 43: one is item 7B. It's recommended
01:30:49 Speaker 43: that the 2027 response time performance
01:30:53 Speaker 43: plan, as outlined in the report
01:30:56 Speaker 43: PSRCW0426, be approved and submitted to
01:30:58 Speaker 43: the Ministry of Health. May I
01:31:01 Speaker 43: ask for a mover and a
01:31:04 Speaker 43: second? Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded
01:31:06 Speaker 43: by Councillor Eccles. It's now on
01:31:09 Speaker 43: the floor for discussion. Welcome. Director
01:31:10 Speaker 43: McCloud. Good morning, Warden County Council.
01:31:14 Speaker 43: I did bring a friend, and
01:31:16 Speaker 43: I'll introduce Jessica when she comes
01:31:18 Speaker 43: up here. But, anyways, knowing that
01:31:19 Speaker 43: I have three reports, so I'll
01:31:21 Speaker 43: try to keep them short. That
01:31:22 Speaker 43: I might do before lunch. So.
01:31:25 Speaker 43: Okay, so each year we have
01:31:27 Speaker 43: to develop a response time plan
01:31:31 Speaker 43: for the upcoming year, and I
01:31:33 Speaker 43: think we sorry. A response time.
01:31:34 Speaker 43: Oh, each year we have to
01:31:37 Speaker 43: develop a response time performance plan
01:31:40 Speaker 43: prior to October first, and then
01:31:42 Speaker 43: submit it to the ministry prior
01:31:44 Speaker 43: to the end of October. This
01:31:46 Speaker 43: plan is to cover the twenty
01:31:48 Speaker 43: twenty seven year. To cover the
01:31:50 Speaker 43: 2027 year, and in March of
01:31:52 Speaker 43: next year we'll report on the
01:31:54 Speaker 43: response times from 2026. So this
01:31:56 Speaker 43: chart it lays out our response
01:31:58 Speaker 43: time plan. It also gives you
01:32:00 Speaker 43: what the 2025 response time performance
01:32:02 Speaker 43: was, and then also up till
01:32:04 Speaker 43: June 2026 or June 30th, 2026,
01:32:06 Speaker 43: and then also our our five-year
01:32:09 Speaker 43: average. The response times that we
01:32:12 Speaker 43: have were developed back in 2012
01:32:15 Speaker 43: when 12, when this new response
01:32:16 Speaker 43: time framework was first implemented, and
01:32:18 Speaker 43: the times were took from how
01:32:23 Speaker 43: we were achieving goals at that
01:32:25 Speaker 43: point. We haven't changed the response
01:32:26 Speaker 43: times other than in 2017. We
01:32:28 Speaker 43: improved upon the CTS1 response time
01:32:30 Speaker 43: from 50% to 60%, and we
01:32:32 Speaker 43: also moved the CTS3, 4, and
01:32:33 Speaker 43: 5 from 30 minutes down to
01:32:37 Speaker 43: 20 minutes. So we've improved upon
01:32:39 Speaker 43: those response times. Sudden cardiac arrest
01:32:42 Speaker 43: is six minutes or less, and
01:32:44 Speaker 43: we as a miss. And we,
01:32:46 Speaker 43: as a municipality, can set the
01:32:49 Speaker 43: percentage. C task one is set
01:32:51 Speaker 43: at eight minutes, and we, as
01:32:52 Speaker 43: municipality, can set the percentage of
01:32:53 Speaker 43: how often we are able to
01:32:55 Speaker 43: achieve that goal. C task two,
01:32:56 Speaker 43: three, four, and five, the municipality
01:32:58 Speaker 43: can set the response time as
01:32:59 Speaker 43: well as the percentage. So, if
01:33:00 Speaker 43: you can see our targets, it's
01:33:02 Speaker 43: a forty percent of the time
01:33:03 Speaker 43: for cardiac arrest in six minutes
01:33:04 Speaker 43: or less. For C task one,
01:33:05 Speaker 43: it's eight minutes, sixty percent. 60%,
01:33:06 Speaker 43: and then C test two is
01:33:07 Speaker 43: 15 minutes at 90%, and then
01:33:09 Speaker 43: C test three, four, and five
01:33:10 Speaker 43: are all at 90% for 20
01:33:13 Speaker 43: minutes. Just to give you an
01:33:14 Speaker 43: idea about also how we look
01:33:17 Speaker 43: at calls, we also look at
01:33:18 Speaker 43: just all call floors together as
01:33:20 Speaker 43: opposed to breaking up by C
01:33:22 Speaker 43: test, and you can see we've
01:33:23 Speaker 43: been in that 15-minute range for
01:33:25 Speaker 43: quite some time. 15, 32, and
01:33:26 Speaker 43: in 2025 and Two in in
01:33:27 Speaker 43: 2025 and 1540 this year, and
01:33:29 Speaker 43: this this has been around 15
01:33:30 Speaker 43: minutes since back almost back to
01:33:32 Speaker 43: 1996 when the last response time
01:33:37 Speaker 43: standard was. We measure by a
01:33:38 Speaker 43: 90th percentile because that gives us
01:33:41 Speaker 43: under normal usage what time you
01:33:44 Speaker 43: can expect the ambulance to get
01:33:45 Speaker 43: to the scene nine times out
01:33:51 Speaker 43: of ten in the county, and
01:33:53 Speaker 43: that's from the time the pager
01:33:55 Speaker 43: goes off until the time we
01:33:57 Speaker 43: arrive at the scene. So if
01:34:00 Speaker 43: you look at that, if you
01:34:01 Speaker 43: build in a shoot time of
01:34:02 Speaker 43: when the pager goes off in
01:34:04 Speaker 43: the base, it takes you a
01:34:05 Speaker 43: minute and a half to get
01:34:06 Speaker 43: in the truck and. figure out
01:34:07 Speaker 43: where you're going. Nine times out
01:34:09 Speaker 43: of ten, in gray so far
01:34:11 Speaker 43: this year, we're at the scene
01:34:13 Speaker 43: 15 minutes and 40 seconds. Nine
01:34:15 Speaker 43: times out of ten, we also
01:34:16 Speaker 43: look at average response times. Doesn't
01:34:19 Speaker 43: really tell you a lot, like
01:34:21 Speaker 43: as far as like because there's
01:34:25 Speaker 43: lots of two minute response times
01:34:27 Speaker 43: and maybe 28 minute response times,
01:34:29 Speaker 43: but it's just a good gauge
01:34:31 Speaker 43: that we keep an eye on
01:34:33 Speaker 43: average to see if that's going
01:34:34 Speaker 43: up or down, and it's typically
01:34:36 Speaker 43: in this seven minute range. So.
01:34:37 Speaker 43: if approved, this will be what
01:34:38 Speaker 43: will be submitted to the ministry
01:34:43 Speaker 43: this year. Again, everything will remain
01:34:46 Speaker 43: the same, but that'll be submitted
01:34:48 Speaker 43: in, and then it'll be published
01:34:51 Speaker 43: for for people to see. Just
01:34:53 Speaker 43: in regards to call volume, this
01:34:55 Speaker 43: year so far, up until June,
01:34:58 Speaker 43: we've seen a three percent increase
01:35:01 Speaker 43: in call volume. If you look
01:35:03 Speaker 43: at last year, we had almost
01:35:05 Speaker 43: a nine percent increase in call
01:35:07 Speaker 43: volume last year, and that. Volume
01:35:12 Speaker 43: last year, and that's why it's
01:35:14 Speaker 43: important not to look one year
01:35:15 Speaker 43: at a time. You have to
01:35:16 Speaker 43: look at over periods of five
01:35:17 Speaker 43: years and ten years to see.
01:35:20 Speaker 43: And if you see below the
01:35:23 Speaker 43: last bullet over the last five
01:35:24 Speaker 43: years, a forty-three percent increase in
01:35:28 Speaker 43: call volume, and the last five
01:35:30 Speaker 43: years, we're looking about averaging about
01:35:32 Speaker 43: a six point six percent per
01:35:34 Speaker 43: year. The ORH study, they're looking
01:35:40 Speaker 43: predicting about five point eight percent
01:35:42 Speaker 43: over the next ten years, beginning
01:35:43 Speaker 43: in twenty twenty three. So it's
01:35:47 Speaker 43: fairly close to what they're predicting,
01:35:51 Speaker 43: but there are times where you
01:35:53 Speaker 43: see a one percent and then
01:35:54 Speaker 43: you see a nine percent, and
01:35:57 Speaker 43: they kind of just average out.
01:35:58 Speaker 43: So we are doing a comprehensive
01:35:59 Speaker 43: deployment review update. This will be
01:36:01 Speaker 43: a check-in. We're just below
01:36:04 Speaker 43: the midway point of the plan,
01:36:05 Speaker 43: and the results of that review
01:36:08 Speaker 43: will be coming out later this
01:36:09 Speaker 43: year. We're looking at call volumes,
01:36:11 Speaker 43: predicted call volumes, response times. asking
01:36:13 Speaker 43: questions about you know looking at
01:36:16 Speaker 43: population growth to see if it's
01:36:16 Speaker 43: remained the same, looking at our
01:36:18 Speaker 43: bases, the locations, shift patterns, staffing,
01:36:20 Speaker 43: and just kind of comparing it
01:36:23 Speaker 43: to what we have in place
01:36:25 Speaker 43: right now to make sure it's
01:36:27 Speaker 43: on track to be able to
01:36:29 Speaker 43: meet the our our intention of
01:36:31 Speaker 43: maintaining those response times in around
01:36:34 Speaker 43: that fifteen minutes for about four
01:36:37 Speaker 43: calls. So these the respect the
01:36:38 Speaker 43: results of the that. The results
01:36:40 Speaker 43: of that review will end up
01:36:45 Speaker 43: coming forward later this year in
01:36:48 Speaker 43: 2026 to be able to present
01:36:51 Speaker 43: to receive. Also happening, and Jessica
01:36:53 Speaker 43: will talk about this in a
01:36:55 Speaker 02: minute. There's a new triage tool.
01:36:56 Speaker 02: The current triage tool is kind
01:36:58 Speaker 02: of it's more I'd say outdated
01:36:59 Speaker 02: now. This is a new tool
01:37:03 Speaker 02: that will allow better prioritization of
01:37:04 Speaker 02: calls. And again, I'll let Jessica
01:37:06 Speaker 02: talk. about that. But we look
01:37:08 Speaker 02: forward to that to help again
01:37:10 Speaker 02: with our more immediate threats and
01:37:14 Speaker 02: life-threatening calls. It'll it'll really great
01:37:15 Speaker 02: aid with it. Also happening right
01:37:17 Speaker 02: now is we've been talking about
01:37:19 Speaker 02: this for a little over a
01:37:22 Speaker 02: year now. They are relooking at
01:37:24 Speaker 11: the response time standard. In November
01:37:26 Speaker 11: of twenty-five, they took it out
01:37:28 Speaker 11: of the regulation and brought it
01:37:30 Speaker 11: into a standard, and they've kept
01:37:31 Speaker 11: the current framework. But most likely,
01:37:33 Speaker 11: what you'll see is a new
01:37:36 Speaker 11: framework that'll look more at a
01:37:38 Speaker 11: urban rural, and remote framework in
01:37:40 Speaker 11: response to COVID calls, but that
01:37:49 Speaker 11: has not been finished yet. I
01:37:50 Speaker 11: have seen the the final. I'm
01:37:52 Speaker 11: fortunate to be able to be
01:37:55 Speaker 43: on the committee, so hopefully that
01:37:57 Speaker 43: moves forward in the next year
01:37:58 Speaker 43: or so. No, taking questions. Okay,
01:38:00 Speaker 43: thank you. So we'll focus our
01:38:01 Speaker 43: questions on the response time performance
01:38:03 Speaker 43: plan. It being noted that item
01:38:05 Speaker 43: seven C will be a chance
01:38:06 Speaker 43: for. us to ask more questions,
01:38:07 Speaker 43: both of Director McNabb, but also
01:38:10 Speaker 43: our Deputy Chief of Paramedic Services
01:38:11 Speaker 43: for the Medical Priority Dispatch System.
01:38:14 Speaker 43: So let's save any questions on
01:38:17 Speaker 43: that until we get to Item
01:38:19 Speaker 43: seven C. But with regards to
01:38:21 Speaker 43: the performance plan, any questions, Deputy
01:38:24 Speaker 43: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and
01:38:25 Speaker 43: thank you, Kevin, for that report.
01:38:26 Speaker 43: It's always interesting to see the
01:38:29 Speaker 43: numbers. You indicated that the the
01:38:30 Speaker 43: average response time is fifteen minutes
01:38:32 Speaker 43: plus or minus for. thirty some
01:38:34 Speaker 43: odd years. Where's the pinch point
01:38:37 Speaker 43: on that one, and why is
01:38:38 Speaker 43: that not advancing, getting better? Is
01:38:48 Speaker 43: it just because physically we've got
01:38:50 Speaker 43: not enough people and too much
01:38:51 Speaker 45: geography, or or the the trucks
01:38:53 Speaker 45: don't levitate yet, or what? What
01:38:54 Speaker 45: is the real reason why that
01:38:55 Speaker 45: number just doesn't seem to move?
01:38:57 Speaker 45: Please. In in rural Ontario, I
01:39:00 Speaker 45: think the biggest thing that we
01:39:01 Speaker 45: face is. geography, as far as
01:39:03 Speaker 45: being able to respond, and we're
01:39:04 Speaker 45: talking nine times out of ten,
01:39:06 Speaker 45: or the ninetieth percentile. So it
01:39:07 Speaker 45: really gives you only ten percent
01:39:11 Speaker 45: of the calls that could be
01:39:12 Speaker 45: above above that time. And when
01:39:14 Speaker 45: you look at the mapping that
01:39:15 Speaker 45: we're doing around bases, and being
01:39:16 Speaker 45: able to spread out our resources,
01:39:18 Speaker 45: we're trying to tackle those areas
01:39:19 Speaker 45: to try to improve upon them,
01:39:20 Speaker 45: recognizing also that those areas are
01:39:23 Speaker 45: lower density, lower call volume. So
01:39:24 Speaker 45: being able to find the best
01:39:25 Speaker 45: way. to match resources with density
01:39:26 Speaker 45: versus area, that's why we have
01:39:28 Speaker 45: to have R H to help
01:39:30 Speaker 45: guide us in that. But so
01:39:34 Speaker 45: I would say so. There's a
01:39:38 Speaker 45: combination here. One is the large
01:39:39 Speaker 45: geography of Gray County, and then
01:39:40 Speaker 45: it's also rising in call volumes.
01:39:43 Speaker 33: Both both of those I would
01:39:46 Speaker 33: say are the major factors. Considering
01:39:48 Speaker 33: the size of our county. and
01:39:50 Speaker 33: being able to say that nine
01:39:51 Speaker 33: times out of ten that we're
01:40:01 Speaker 33: arriving, you know, in the drive
01:40:02 Speaker 33: time of thirteen and a half
01:40:05 Speaker 46: to fourteen minutes when you include
01:40:06 Speaker 46: shoot time, we're working pretty hard.
01:40:08 Speaker 46: Like we, we we don't leave
01:40:09 Speaker 43: areas uncovered. You know, we move
01:40:12 Speaker 43: multiple standbys to be able to
01:40:14 Speaker 43: cover those areas off to split
01:40:15 Speaker 43: differences. There's a lot of work
01:40:17 Speaker 43: that goes in the background. The
01:40:19 Speaker 43: call that's just happened, you know,
01:40:21 Speaker 43: we know what resources are going,
01:40:22 Speaker 43: what's needed, but nobody really sees
01:40:24 Speaker 43: the planning that goes in the
01:40:26 Speaker 43: background to say, well, what happens
01:40:28 Speaker 43: with the next call. To say,
01:40:29 Speaker 43: well, what happens when the next
01:40:31 Speaker 43: call happens? We're trying to put
01:40:33 Speaker 43: resources in place for the call
01:40:37 Speaker 43: that hasn't happened yet. So it's
01:40:39 Speaker 43: not just about responding to the
01:40:40 Speaker 43: call; it's about thinking about where
01:40:43 Speaker 43: the next call is going to
01:40:45 Speaker 43: be and try to minimizing that
01:40:46 Speaker 43: next response in case something happens,
01:40:48 Speaker 43: and it's hard to predict. Okay,
01:40:50 Speaker 43: thank you. We'll go to Councillor
01:40:53 Speaker 43: Kevney. Thank you, Madam Warden, and
01:40:55 Speaker 43: Director McNab. May I ask you
01:40:57 Speaker 43: how much of a challenge is
01:40:58 Speaker 43: Google mapping in terms of new
01:41:00 Speaker 43: addressing, new civic addressing, getting uploaded
01:41:03 Speaker 43: into Google Maps, and and is
01:41:05 Speaker 43: that creating any issue for you
01:41:06 Speaker 43: in finding those new addresses? I
01:41:07 Speaker 43: would say that we have a
01:41:08 Speaker 43: fairly extensive GIS team. That so
01:41:10 Speaker 43: when there are new streets, they're
01:41:11 Speaker 43: in constant contact with our dispatch
01:41:12 Speaker 43: centre and be able to update
01:41:15 Speaker 43: those maps. I think sometimes we
01:41:17 Speaker 43: end up in new developments where
01:41:18 Speaker 43: it may be a private road
01:41:19 Speaker 43: or a private area that doesn't
01:41:21 Speaker 43: get updated. Sometimes those take longer,
01:41:22 Speaker 43: and we sometimes enter like when
01:41:24 Speaker 43: we see a look at a
01:41:27 Speaker 43: response time, we see that that
01:41:28 Speaker 43: wasn't indicated. So we do have
01:41:29 Speaker 43: mechanisms to trigger when our response
01:41:35 Speaker 43: times aren't met. We looked at
01:41:40 Speaker 43: the reasons why, and sometimes that's
01:41:43 Speaker 43: able to trigger that there's a
01:41:48 Speaker 43: mapping updated required. But our dispatch
01:41:49 Speaker 43: generally has, I would say, almost
01:41:54 Speaker 43: always the most up to date
01:41:55 Speaker 43: map in the vehicles. The the
01:41:57 Speaker 43: CAC the dispatch. centre they send
01:41:59 Speaker 18: the location with the coordinates to
01:42:04 Speaker 18: the to the vehicle which has
01:42:05 Speaker 18: been an update that's been in
01:42:08 Speaker 18: place now probably since 2021 like
01:42:10 Speaker 18: having the the map already displayed
01:42:13 Speaker 18: in the truck and we use
01:42:14 Speaker 18: ways for it so we're able
01:42:16 Speaker 18: to bring in road closures and
01:42:18 Speaker 18: stuff like that which has significantly
01:42:21 Speaker 18: helped the response. There's some addresses
01:42:23 Speaker 18: if you're not like if we
01:42:24 Speaker 18: have a paramedic working in Gray
01:42:27 Speaker 18: they could have grew up in
01:42:29 Speaker 18: Craigleith and they have to work
01:42:31 Speaker 18: in Hanover having that ability you
01:42:37 Speaker 18: know to get in the truck
01:42:39 Speaker 18: and to know where you're going,
01:42:41 Speaker 18: really helps. So we tried it
01:42:43 Speaker 18: with that, but but yeah, I
01:42:44 Speaker 18: would say you know there's lots
01:42:48 Speaker 18: of work in the background to
01:42:49 Speaker 18: ensure that the GIS information is
01:42:50 Speaker 43: up to date at dispatch, and
01:42:53 Speaker 43: they're they're always overlaying those new
01:42:54 Speaker 43: roads into the CAD. I'm not
01:42:56 Speaker 43: saying it's perfect, but they we
01:42:58 Speaker 43: do work hard to make sure
01:43:00 Speaker 43: nothing's missed. Okay. Anything else, Councillor
01:43:01 Speaker 43: McCabe? Sorry, Mackie. ah, ah, you
01:43:03 Speaker 43: get my dessert at lunch. Well,
01:43:04 Speaker 43: Warden, I can say that you're
01:43:06 Speaker 43: not the first person that's made
01:43:08 Speaker 43: that mistake. Thank you, Kevin. Thank
01:43:16 Speaker 43: you very much for the report,
01:43:22 Speaker 43: and I'm, you know, I'm impressed
01:43:25 Speaker 43: with our response times. I had
01:43:27 Speaker 43: the the opportunity to witness the
01:43:30 Speaker 47: response times to my mother's house
01:43:34 Speaker 47: a couple days ago, and I
01:43:36 Speaker 47: was very impressed. She is quite
01:43:38 Speaker 47: rurally located, and the length of
01:43:45 Speaker 47: time was it was less than
01:43:46 Speaker 47: what I anticipated. The ambulance arriving,
01:43:48 Speaker 47: so and the crew did a
01:43:49 Speaker 43: wonderful job looking after. My question
01:43:51 Speaker 43: is in in regards to the
01:43:53 Speaker 43: response times. How does our winter
01:43:55 Speaker 43: weather factor into the? Do we
01:43:57 Speaker 43: have any idea what our inclement
01:44:01 Speaker 43: winter weather does to our response
01:44:02 Speaker 43: times? Thank you. Yeah, generally winter
01:44:04 Speaker 43: will play a role in this,
01:44:05 Speaker 43: whether it's icy roads or can't
01:44:07 Speaker 43: see and stuff like that. Again,
01:44:10 Speaker 43: that falls into that ten percent
01:44:11 Speaker 43: range of anomalies. Like I, I
01:44:12 Speaker 43: don't can't like say off the
01:44:14 Speaker 43: top of my head like what
01:44:15 Speaker 43: what the time difference is, but
01:44:16 Speaker 43: you see it that when we
01:44:19 Speaker 43: look at response times where we
01:44:21 Speaker 43: didn't meet the target, that the
01:44:23 Speaker 43: weather is related. Like we ask
01:44:26 Speaker 43: the crew when the call closes,
01:44:28 Speaker 43: why did it take you this
01:44:30 Speaker 43: long to get to the call,
01:44:32 Speaker 43: and then usually it's. And usually,
01:44:34 Speaker 43: it's generally the two most common
01:44:34 Speaker 43: are distance and weather. Okay, thank
01:44:38 Speaker 43: you, Councillor McKay. Thank you, Alderman
01:44:40 Speaker 43: Thornton. You, Kevin, do you keep
01:44:42 Speaker 43: stats on AED calls, private, like
01:44:44 Speaker 43: the ones that are in the
01:44:46 Speaker 43: public hands, and that how many
01:44:48 Speaker 43: times they're used and are they
01:44:51 Speaker 43: worthwhile? How are they these ones
01:44:52 Speaker 43: in certain places? I guess arenas,
01:44:56 Speaker 43: yes. But thanks. One of the
01:44:56 Speaker 43: issues with the response time framework,
01:45:01 Speaker 43: and we've talked about data a
01:45:02 Speaker 21: fair bit, is actually using that
01:45:06 Speaker 21: data towards ours and getting that
01:45:08 Speaker 21: those times back. Like typically, it's
01:45:14 Speaker 21: based only when the ambulance arrives.
01:45:16 Speaker 21: But are AEDs necessary? Yeah, they
01:45:18 Speaker 48: are. Well, if you have one
01:45:21 Speaker 48: AED work once. a year. Depends
01:45:22 Speaker 48: who it's for, I guess, but
01:45:24 Speaker 48: I would say it's worth it
01:45:27 Speaker 48: no matter what. I hope someday
01:45:28 Speaker 48: that AEDs are in every home.
01:45:30 Speaker 48: That's where it needs to be.
01:45:32 Speaker 48: Most cardiac arrests happen in the
01:45:33 Speaker 48: home. That's probably where they need
01:45:39 Speaker 48: to get to. Right now, it's
01:45:42 Speaker 48: been mandated to be on job
01:45:43 Speaker 45: sites, but you know, we—I'd say
01:45:46 Speaker 45: we have a fairly strong programme
01:45:48 Speaker 45: here in Gray. That part of
01:45:50 Speaker 45: the paramedic services budget is to
01:45:52 Speaker 45: maintain over the 200 that we
01:45:54 Speaker 45: have. We ensure that there's batteries.
01:45:55 Speaker 45: and pads, and that they're doing
01:45:56 Speaker 45: their checks, that they're ready to
01:45:58 Speaker 45: go when they're needed. But, but
01:46:01 Speaker 45: I, I really hope a day
01:46:02 Speaker 45: comes that we expand a DFB,
01:46:04 Speaker 45: maybe gets to be three hundred
01:46:07 Speaker 45: dollars or five hundred dollars, that
01:46:09 Speaker 45: people can afford them in their
01:46:09 Speaker 45: homes. And, but yeah, we we
01:46:11 Speaker 45: do use public access DFBs. We've
01:46:13 Speaker 45: had them in arenas. We've used
01:46:16 Speaker 45: them in different places. Yet, I
01:46:19 Speaker 45: would say it's worthwhile to keep
01:46:21 Speaker 45: going with. Okay, thank you. We'll
01:46:23 Speaker 45: go to Councillor Greg and then
01:46:24 Speaker 45: to alternate Councillor Kepka. Thank you,
01:46:26 Speaker 45: Kevin. My question is: How do
01:46:28 Speaker 45: hospital offloading requirements impact your your
01:46:30 Speaker 45: response times? And certainly, it was
01:46:32 Speaker 45: a significant challenge going back a
01:46:35 Speaker 45: few years. You're having your resources—I
01:46:37 Speaker 45: don't want to say tied up,
01:46:38 Speaker 45: but being required for prolonged periods
01:46:40 Speaker 45: of time at hospitals offloading. How
01:46:42 Speaker 45: are we comparing that? How are
01:46:44 Speaker 45: we comparing now to the the
01:47:00 Speaker 45: challenges of a few years ago,
01:47:02 Speaker 45: and and what are the impacts
01:47:03 Speaker 03: of that still on on the
01:47:10 Speaker 45: plan that you're putting forward? Yeah,
01:47:12 Speaker 45: prior probably to 2022, I would
01:47:15 Speaker 45: say we really didn't have an
01:47:18 Speaker 49: offload problem, but in 2022 we
01:47:21 Speaker 49: have seen increases, particularly in Owen
01:47:23 Speaker 49: Sound and in Collingwood in the
01:47:26 Speaker 49: wintertime. I can't say enough about
01:47:30 Speaker 49: Bright Shores of how they've tried
01:47:36 Speaker 49: to do things to help. We
01:47:38 Speaker 49: have the fit to sit programme.
01:47:39 Speaker 49: now. We have extra offload stretchers.
01:47:41 Speaker 45: We have an offload duty nurse,
01:47:43 Speaker 45: which we've asked for more funding
01:47:44 Speaker 45: to be able to have a
01:47:45 Speaker 45: nurse available. We haven't received that
01:47:48 Speaker 45: yet. They only probably give us
01:47:50 Speaker 45: a quarter of what we need
01:47:51 Speaker 45: for that programme that to support
01:47:52 Speaker 45: the hospital. We hope that that'll
01:47:54 Speaker 45: increase this year, but it does
01:47:55 Speaker 45: create issues. Like you know, when
01:47:56 Speaker 45: sandwiches are busiest, centre on busy
01:48:01 Speaker 45: days, it can be not uncommon
01:48:03 Speaker 45: to have four or five ambulances
01:48:05 Speaker 45: sitting and waiting. Five animals just
01:48:08 Speaker 45: sitting and waiting for a bed,
01:48:10 Speaker 21: and so then that's a communication
01:48:11 Speaker 21: between supervisor and the nurse and
01:48:13 Speaker 21: the crews. Sometimes we double up
01:48:16 Speaker 21: patients, stuff like that. But no,
01:48:19 Speaker 21: it can be challenging at times,
01:48:20 Speaker 21: and it always seems to happen
01:48:22 Speaker 21: when you're the busiest too. Like
01:48:24 Speaker 21: typically, it's flu season. Merge is
01:48:26 Speaker 21: busy, most likely because we were
01:48:27 Speaker 21: busy. Okay, alternate. Part of the
01:48:30 Speaker 21: ORH review will be to to
01:48:32 Speaker 21: be looking at that again, and
01:48:34 Speaker 21: they will be able to comment
01:48:41 Speaker 21: on it. Thank you, through you,
01:48:42 Speaker 21: Warden, to Kevin. My question is
01:48:45 Speaker 21: more regarding communication, and I wondered
01:48:47 Speaker 43: when a call comes in, and
01:48:48 Speaker 43: it's answered by. whatever services are
01:48:51 Speaker 43: required to go there. Is it
01:48:53 Speaker 43: communicated to the incident how long
01:48:54 Speaker 43: approximately resources may be coming? That's
01:48:55 Speaker 43: one thing our dispatch centre will
01:48:57 Speaker 43: not do. I don't believe that
01:48:58 Speaker 43: they will say that time. They
01:49:05 Speaker 43: will reassure them that they've been
01:49:08 Speaker 43: dispatched and on their way. But
01:49:13 Speaker 43: I don't believe that they actually
01:49:14 Speaker 43: give a time because that could
01:49:16 Speaker 43: change. If they're going to be
01:49:18 Speaker 50: delayed, they will call back. you
01:49:20 Speaker 50: know. Within, I think I believe
01:49:24 Speaker 50: it's thirty minutes. They do a
01:49:26 Speaker 50: check in, but they do not
01:49:28 Speaker 50: say they're going to be six
01:49:29 Speaker 50: or seven minutes or whatever that
01:49:32 Speaker 50: time is. Okay. Any further questions
01:49:35 Speaker 50: on this one? All right. Not
01:49:36 Speaker 50: seeing any further hands. All those
01:49:37 Speaker 50: in favour? Okay. That motion is
01:49:39 Speaker 50: carried. Thank you. So we will
01:49:41 Speaker 50: now move on to item seven
01:49:43 Speaker 50: C. It's recommended that report PSRCW
01:49:45 Speaker 50: zero six twenty six regarding the
01:49:47 Speaker 50: medical priority dispatch. System be received
01:49:49 Speaker 50: for information. They ask for a
01:49:51 Speaker 50: mover and a seconder. Got it
01:49:52 Speaker 50: moved by Councillor Pringle, seconded by
01:49:54 Speaker 50: Councillor Patterson. It's on the floor
01:49:56 Speaker 50: for discussion. So, Director McNab, I
01:49:58 Speaker 50: understand you are going to be
01:50:04 Speaker 50: introducing Deputy Chief Rob for this
01:50:05 Speaker 50: one as well. Yes, thank you,
01:50:09 Speaker 50: Warden and Council. It's my pleasure
01:50:10 Speaker 50: to introduce Jessica Rob, who's our
01:50:12 Speaker 50: Deputy Chief of Operations, and she's
01:50:14 Speaker 50: done the. majority of the work
01:50:17 Speaker 50: on this implementation. It's been quite
01:50:19 Speaker 50: a process to get to where
01:50:22 Speaker 50: it is today. There's a lot
01:50:23 Speaker 50: of work that goes in the
01:50:26 Speaker 50: background to implement this, and so
01:50:28 Speaker 50: who who best to tell you
01:50:31 Speaker 50: about it than her? So here
01:50:33 Speaker 50: we go. Good morning, Marden. All
01:50:35 Speaker 50: right, counselors. Thank you for having
01:50:37 Speaker 50: me. So it is the recommendation
01:50:38 Speaker 50: of our department that we present
01:50:41 Speaker 50: this report for. your information and
01:50:44 Speaker 50: understanding of how the implementation of
01:50:46 Speaker 50: this new system will impact the
01:50:47 Speaker 50: community. On October 14th of
01:50:50 Speaker 50: this year, our CAC London Dispatch
01:50:53 Speaker 50: Centre is going to be changing
01:50:56 Speaker 50: to a new dispatch system known
01:50:57 Speaker 50: as the Medical Priority Dispatch System,
01:51:00 Speaker 50: or MPDS, is what we call
01:51:02 Speaker 50: it. So this new system is
01:51:03 Speaker 50: being implemented by the Ministry of
01:51:05 Speaker 50: Health. They're rolling it out province-wide,
01:51:06 Speaker 50: and about half of the province
01:51:07 Speaker 50: has transitioned so far to date.
01:51:13 Speaker 50: it's going to be replacing our
01:51:15 Speaker 50: current system, which we call DPCI.
01:51:16 Speaker 50: It's been in place since the
01:51:20 Speaker 50: early '90s, and the goal of
01:51:23 Speaker 50: this new system is to optimize
01:51:24 Speaker 50: the resources across the county and
01:51:26 Speaker 50: get our paramedics to the sickest
01:51:29 Speaker 50: and most at-risk patients first. This
01:51:30 Speaker 50: chart represents a comparison of
01:51:33 Speaker 50: the old model versus the new
01:51:35 Speaker 50: model. Under DPCI, you'll see code
01:51:42 Speaker 50: four and code three were the
01:51:44 Speaker 50: only level of priority calls. for
01:51:46 Speaker 50: the community, so these two categories
01:51:49 Speaker 50: would be all inclusive of any
01:51:51 Speaker 50: medical emergency coming in through the
01:51:54 Speaker 50: 911 system. Whereas the MPDS has
01:51:55 Speaker 50: divided it down into five different
01:51:58 Speaker 50: priority levels. So under the
01:52:00 Speaker 50: current DPCI, a person
01:52:03 Speaker 50: experiencing vomiting or a laceration,
01:52:06 Speaker 50: a heart attack or a cardiac
01:52:08 Speaker 50: arrest could all be assigned as
01:52:11 Speaker 50: a code four response. These calls
01:52:13 Speaker 50: would be entered into the queue
01:52:19 Speaker 50: as they're received, and then dispatched
01:52:20 Speaker 50: on a first come. first serve
01:52:22 Speaker 50: basis. Under the new MPDS, dispatchers
01:52:23 Speaker 50: are going to be able to
01:52:26 Speaker 50: better prioritize medical conditions and divert
01:52:27 Speaker 50: ambulances to areas when an immediate
01:52:30 Speaker 50: life threat is identified. So, if
01:52:33 Speaker 50: there is a unit that is
01:52:35 Speaker 50: assigned on a priority basis for
01:52:36 Speaker 50: a patient with a laceration, and
01:52:40 Speaker 50: if they've been identified as the
01:52:42 Speaker 50: closest unit to a cardiac arrest
01:52:46 Speaker 50: that comes in, they will be
01:52:48 Speaker 50: diverted to the patient who has
01:52:51 Speaker 50: the greater need for timely care.
01:52:54 Speaker 50: So, in addition to being able
01:52:56 Speaker 50: to improve the triaging of medical
01:53:00 Speaker 50: emergencies, some key changes include best
01:53:02 Speaker 50: unit assignments, low priority thresholds, and
01:53:05 Speaker 50: region critical counts. All of which
01:53:07 Speaker 50: will help us improve our emergency
01:53:13 Speaker 50: coverage across the county. It also
01:53:15 Speaker 50: gives us an opportunity to better
01:53:16 Speaker 50: prioritize interfacility transfers to balance our
01:53:19 Speaker 50: community needs with the hospital needs.
01:53:21 Speaker 50: MPDS is clinically validated as safe
01:53:23 Speaker 50: and reliable way to triage medical
01:53:25 Speaker 50: conditions, and there's quality assurance programmemes
01:53:27 Speaker 50: in place, including a dispatch review
01:53:29 Speaker 50: committee in each jurisdiction, and they
01:53:32 Speaker 50: continuously review calls as they come
01:53:34 Speaker 50: in and the impacts of the
01:53:37 Speaker 50: wait times. Communities are going to
01:53:38 Speaker 50: see improved prioritization of life-threatening emergencies,
01:53:45 Speaker 50: more efficient operations, more sustainable programmeings.
01:53:48 Speaker 50: There may be community members. with
01:53:49 Speaker 50: lower needs who experience delays for
01:53:51 Speaker 50: service, and healthcare facilities will see
01:53:52 Speaker 21: changes in how transfers are prioritized.
01:53:54 Speaker 21: So, to make sure that we
01:53:56 Speaker 21: are prepared, we've taken a number
01:53:58 Speaker 21: of steps. We've met with all
01:54:01 Speaker 21: of the fire chiefs in the
01:54:06 Speaker 21: county, and we've all been able
01:54:07 Speaker 21: to agree that the translation of
01:54:09 Speaker 21: responses from the current DPDI to
01:54:12 Speaker 21: MPDS will maintain the same level
01:54:14 Speaker 21: of response that the. community is
01:54:17 Speaker 21: receiving now. Our deployment utilization strategy
01:54:20 Speaker 21: has been updated to account for
01:54:22 Speaker 51: resource allocation, wait times, and thresholds.
01:54:24 Speaker 51: Staff education has been built in
01:54:28 Speaker 51: short, online, digestible modules for staff
01:54:30 Speaker 51: to complete at their ability. We
01:54:31 Speaker 51: have staff who are sitting on
01:54:33 Speaker 52: regional change management and dispatch review
01:54:36 Speaker 52: committees that will continue throughout the
01:54:37 Speaker 52: transition and afterwards, and we have.
01:54:39 Speaker 52: ongoing engagement sessions with our hospitals,
01:54:45 Speaker 52: long-term care, fire, and police departments.
01:54:46 Speaker 52: So dispatch operations are governed by
01:54:48 Speaker 52: the Ministry of Health, and they
01:54:50 Speaker 52: develop this patient journey, which outlines
01:54:52 Speaker 52: how emergency calls are received and
01:54:54 Speaker 52: how they're prioritized in the queue.
01:55:01 Speaker 52: And then we take that information
01:55:07 Speaker 53: and create a plan for the
01:55:09 Speaker 53: deployment to the emergency calls based
01:55:10 Speaker 53: on our local resources and capacity.
01:55:13 Speaker 33: No changes. to funding, staffing, or
01:55:14 Speaker 33: resources is anticipated to facilitate this
01:55:15 Speaker 33: change, and we're confident we're prepared
01:55:18 Speaker 33: for a seamless transition. Thank you.
01:55:20 Speaker 33: Thank you very much for those
01:55:21 Speaker 33: details and the explanation about what
01:55:24 Speaker 33: it means differently and how you've
01:55:27 Speaker 33: been able to parse it now
01:55:29 Speaker 33: into the colour coding instead of
01:55:30 Speaker 33: grouped together. It sounds like it
01:55:37 Speaker 33: must be a very exciting transition
01:55:40 Speaker 33: for you. Yeah, absolutely. All right.
01:55:43 Speaker 33: So with that, any questions, Deputy
01:55:45 Speaker 33: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and
01:55:47 Speaker 33: thank you, Jessica, for the report
01:55:48 Speaker 33: for the discussion there. When an
01:55:50 Speaker 33: airplane's taking off, there's a certain
01:55:53 Speaker 50: point of no return. They must
01:55:54 Speaker 50: continue to. What would be the
01:55:56 Speaker 50: point of no return for an
01:55:58 Speaker 50: ambulance responding to an incident of
01:55:59 Speaker 50: low acuity, before they would not
01:56:00 Speaker 50: be diverted? Like, would it be
01:56:03 Speaker 50: literally? they turn in the gate?
01:56:07 Speaker 50: Nope, we're not going there. We're
01:56:09 Speaker 50: going further. Or is is there
01:56:11 Speaker 50: a point of no return where
01:56:16 Speaker 50: they would respond to a certain
01:56:17 Speaker 50: call before they would be diverted?
01:56:18 Speaker 50: Please. Yeah, it would be my
01:56:20 Speaker 50: understanding that that would be at
01:56:23 Speaker 50: the time of patient contact. So,
01:56:24 Speaker 50: should a higher acuity come call
01:56:26 Speaker 50: come in, if that ambulance hasn't
01:56:27 Speaker 50: made patient contact, they could be
01:56:29 Speaker 50: diverted. Okay. Thank you. Great question.
01:56:31 Speaker 50: Oh, Councillor Heaney. Thank you, Madam
01:56:33 Speaker 50: Warden, and Jessica. I'm just wondering,
01:56:36 Speaker 50: in relation to your conversations with
01:56:39 Speaker 50: our fire departments as municipalities, should
01:56:43 Speaker 50: we be concerned that there may
01:56:49 Speaker 50: be a greater number of medical
01:56:53 Speaker 50: calls coming to our fire departments?
01:56:57 Speaker 54: Are we prepared for that? Just
01:57:01 Speaker 54: thinking as you're talking about the
01:57:04 Speaker 54: transition period and the possible diversion
01:57:06 Speaker 54: of certain calls. I'm just asking:
01:57:12 Speaker 54: Should our fire departments be prepared
01:57:16 Speaker 54: for a greater number of calls?
01:57:19 Speaker 54: Thank you. I can't predict what's
01:57:24 Speaker 54: going to happen, but I don't.
01:57:28 Speaker 54: I don't believe so. I think
01:57:34 Speaker 54: actually, it's we're gonna. This progress
01:57:37 Speaker 54: is gonna make us make sure
01:57:38 Speaker 54: that we have the right resources
01:57:40 Speaker 54: going at the right times, instead
01:57:44 Speaker 54: of having system overwhelm. And we
01:57:46 Speaker 54: were we were very clear when
01:57:49 Speaker 54: we sat. The fire chiefs were
01:57:50 Speaker 54: very receptive to working as a
01:57:54 Speaker 54: team, and we talked through a
01:57:57 Speaker 54: lot of the points. And we
01:58:00 Speaker 54: talked about things like MBCs, where
01:58:04 Speaker 54: a low priority MBC or motor
01:58:07 Speaker 54: vehicle collision might experience a delay
01:58:11 Speaker 54: in paramedics arriving because it's triaged
01:58:14 Speaker 54: as a green, but they would
01:58:16 Speaker 54: still be dispatched to it. But
01:58:17 Speaker 54: we talked about how that would
01:58:19 Speaker 54: be important because they have other
01:58:21 Speaker 54: roles to play when it comes
01:58:24 Speaker 54: to scene safety. and protecting of
01:58:26 Speaker 21: the scene and things, they have
01:58:27 Speaker 21: a lot of other things that
01:58:29 Speaker 21: they provide, not necessarily based on
01:58:32 Speaker 21: patient contact. So the way that
01:58:35 Speaker 21: a patient is triage doesn't necessarily
01:58:37 Speaker 21: relate to our need for allied
01:58:41 Speaker 21: agencies on scene. Is that fair?
01:58:42 Speaker 21: Okay, thank you. We'll go to
01:58:44 Speaker 21: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, Warden, and
01:58:45 Speaker 21: Jessica. Just. to the deputy warden's
01:58:47 Speaker 21: question and your answer, I can't
01:58:49 Speaker 21: imagine seeing an ambulance pulling up
01:58:51 Speaker 21: my laneway and then having them
01:58:54 Speaker 21: diverted because they haven't actually made
01:58:54 Speaker 21: patient contact. I wondered at some
01:58:56 Speaker 21: point we have other buses, you
01:58:58 Speaker 21: know, covering the area or doing
01:59:01 Speaker 21: things, but. is it communicated to
01:59:03 Speaker 21: the caller their level of priority
01:59:07 Speaker 21: when the call comes in? I,
01:59:08 Speaker 21: in this instance, you know, you
01:59:09 Speaker 21: see the the ambulance coming down
01:59:11 Speaker 21: your farm lane way and then
01:59:12 Speaker 21: backing out and leaving. Um, it
01:59:15 Speaker 50: just I can't imagine the feeling
01:59:16 Speaker 50: of the patient wondering, you know.
01:59:18 Speaker 50: I'm going to bleed to death,
01:59:19 Speaker 50: or could you just please assure
01:59:21 Speaker 50: us that there's other methods in
01:59:22 Speaker 50: place that diversion would be a
01:59:24 Speaker 50: last resort, or the communication to
01:59:27 Speaker 50: the caller or patient they understand
01:59:29 Speaker 50: that they're not a priority. How
01:59:31 Speaker 50: does that work? Okay, just before
01:59:33 Speaker 50: you speak, I do see Director
01:59:35 Speaker 50: McNab is also lining up to
01:59:36 Speaker 50: be able to. facilitate in both
01:59:39 Speaker 50: of you responding, keeping in mind
01:59:41 Speaker 50: too that that what you're describing
01:59:44 Speaker 50: to us is a practice that's
01:59:45 Speaker 50: already in place. It's just using
01:59:48 Speaker 50: the old system right now. So
01:59:51 Speaker 50: there, I'm hearing, if we understand
01:59:55 Speaker 50: correctly, from Director Mc Dow's first
01:59:56 Speaker 50: response to the Deputy Warden, or
01:59:58 Speaker 50: sorry, to the the Deputy Chief,
02:00:00 Speaker 43: that this has always been in
02:00:03 Speaker 43: play. There's always been that question
02:00:05 Speaker 43: of when is the point of
02:00:08 Speaker 43: no return on the. old numbered
02:00:10 Speaker 43: system. Now it's just further refined
02:00:11 Speaker 43: into the colour system. So I
02:00:14 Speaker 43: guess that question may arise more
02:00:17 Speaker 43: frequently than it might have when
02:00:18 Speaker 43: it was just a simple one,
02:00:22 Speaker 43: two, three. So with that, I
02:00:24 Speaker 43: invite the deputy chief to respond
02:00:25 Speaker 43: and and lean into Director Munab
02:00:28 Speaker 43: if you prefer. Thank you. I
02:00:30 Speaker 43: can say that it is like
02:00:31 Speaker 43: it is a current practice. As
02:00:33 Speaker 43: you saw in the chart, there
02:00:36 Speaker 43: is a code three and code
02:00:37 Speaker 43: four priority currently. So if an
02:00:39 Speaker 43: ambulance was dispatched on a code
02:00:40 Speaker 43: three or a low priority call,
02:00:42 Speaker 43: and a code four or a
02:00:44 Speaker 43: higher priority call came in, they
02:00:47 Speaker 43: would be redirected to that if
02:00:48 Speaker 43: they were the closest unit. So,
02:00:50 Speaker 43: it is an ongoing practice. Prior
02:00:51 Speaker 43: to paramedics arriving on scene, the
02:00:53 Speaker 43: patient would be in kind of
02:00:56 Speaker 43: the care and control of the
02:00:58 Speaker 43: dispatch centre and be maintaining communications
02:01:00 Speaker 43: with them. I don't think I
02:01:02 Speaker 43: could fairly speak to their policies,
02:01:04 Speaker 43: but as Director McNaught mentioned, they
02:01:07 Speaker 43: do have regular point contacts. where
02:01:08 Speaker 43: they call back and make contact
02:01:11 Speaker 43: with the patient based on their
02:01:12 Speaker 43: acuity. I would invite Kevin to
02:01:15 Speaker 43: answer anything further that I might
02:01:16 Speaker 43: be missing. Patients are always advised
02:01:19 Speaker 43: if the condition changes to call
02:01:21 Speaker 43: back, and there also is check-ins.
02:01:22 Speaker 43: I believe it's thirty minutes. Just
02:01:24 Speaker 43: recognizing here, the the likelihood of
02:01:25 Speaker 43: that happening is small, but but
02:01:26 Speaker 43: the thing is now even better
02:01:29 Speaker 43: with this new priority tool. If
02:01:30 Speaker 43: we're pulling somebody off for. a
02:01:32 Speaker 43: cardiac arrest from somebody now that
02:01:34 Speaker 43: is an imminently dying, it's to
02:01:36 Speaker 43: help that other person. These are
02:01:40 Speaker 43: difficult discussions and conversations, but it's
02:01:42 Speaker 43: with the best intent to do
02:01:44 Speaker 43: the most for the most critical.
02:01:46 Speaker 43: So I feel for what you're
02:01:48 Speaker 43: saying; like it's not great, and
02:01:50 Speaker 43: is most likely we get an
02:01:52 Speaker 43: inquiry about why the ambulance left,
02:01:54 Speaker 43: and potentially the patient family could
02:01:57 Speaker 43: call and say, "I think the
02:01:58 Speaker 43: ambulance got. They think they might
02:02:00 Speaker 43: have the wrong address." You know.
02:02:02 Speaker 43: stuff like that. But those type
02:02:04 Speaker 43: of conversations would take place if
02:02:07 Speaker 43: they call back. I I know
02:02:09 Speaker 43: because we talked about this before
02:02:10 Speaker 43: in the past about outside of
02:02:12 Speaker 43: the thirty minutes, like they don't
02:02:13 Speaker 43: give times, and I can see
02:02:14 Speaker 43: some reasons for that. But I'm
02:02:15 Speaker 43: not sure. Like when I look
02:02:17 Speaker 43: at our like when we measure
02:02:19 Speaker 43: code four times, we measure from
02:02:23 Speaker 43: the time the pager goes off
02:02:28 Speaker 43: to the time we arrive, because
02:02:31 Speaker 43: code four life and death call.
02:02:33 Speaker 54: Because code four life and death
02:02:38 Speaker 54: calls can't be held, like they
02:02:41 Speaker 54: just they have to be dispatched
02:02:44 Speaker 54: right out. Code three calls are
02:02:48 Speaker 54: now when you look at your
02:02:50 Speaker 54: yellow, your green, yellow, and orange,
02:02:53 Speaker 54: they can be held, and that
02:02:57 Speaker 54: we call that a T one
02:03:00 Speaker 54: time, not a T two time.
02:03:01 Speaker 54: When we look at our, if
02:03:07 Speaker 54: we look at it today, like
02:03:10 Speaker 54: our T one time, the time
02:03:11 Speaker 54: of the call receipt of the
02:03:13 Speaker 54: cact to the time we arrive
02:03:15 Speaker 21: for code threes, again back to
02:03:17 Speaker 21: these green, yellow, and orange, in
02:03:20 Speaker 21: twenty. In 2026, it's 25 minutes.
02:03:22 Speaker 21: So these are lower priority emergency
02:03:24 Speaker 21: calls. Nine times out of ten,
02:03:26 Speaker 21: even including the hold time, is
02:03:31 Speaker 21: still pretty good. Out of nine
02:03:35 Speaker 21: times out of ten, but it
02:03:36 Speaker 21: cannot happen. Yeah, but hopefully, you
02:03:37 Speaker 21: know, I look. There's nothing more
02:03:40 Speaker 21: frustrating as a paramedic that you
02:03:41 Speaker 21: know that somebody they may be
02:03:43 Speaker 21: vomiting and short of breath. Today
02:03:48 Speaker 21: it's a code four, and then
02:03:50 Speaker 21: a cardiac arrest happens around the
02:03:51 Speaker 21: corner. We can't be taken off
02:03:52 Speaker 21: that call. I feel for the
02:03:55 Speaker 21: person that's short of breath and
02:03:56 Speaker 43: vomiting, but that's not an immediate
02:03:58 Speaker 43: threat. And I have to wait
02:04:01 Speaker 43: for an ambulance to go to
02:04:02 Speaker 43: the cardiac arrest that's ten minutes
02:04:04 Speaker 43: away, where I could just go,
02:04:07 Speaker 43: and we we can't do that
02:04:09 Speaker 43: today. Tomorrow, tomorrow we can, or
02:04:11 Speaker 43: October we can. Follow up, and
02:04:13 Speaker 43: thank you. Totally understand. Just when
02:04:14 Speaker 43: it's said out loud and being
02:04:17 Speaker 43: recorded, it's it's often. misinterpreted
02:04:20 Speaker 43: and and the perception they they
02:04:23 Speaker 43: don't always have that information and
02:04:25 Speaker 43: I appreciate the deputy chief's comments
02:04:26 Speaker 43: about and yours about callbacks. There's
02:04:28 Speaker 43: they're in touch with the patient.
02:04:30 Speaker 43: They're monitoring their their situation. So
02:04:32 Speaker 43: the communication piece is so critical.
02:04:34 Speaker 43: And looking forward to this helping
02:04:36 Speaker 43: you deliver the service that you
02:04:37 Speaker 43: so want to do. We so
02:04:39 Speaker 43: want to do. Okay, thank you.
02:04:40 Speaker 43: Anything further? All right. Not seeing
02:04:43 Speaker 43: any further hands. I'll call the
02:04:44 Speaker 43: question. All those in favour? And
02:04:46 Speaker 43: that motion is carried. Thank you
02:04:47 Speaker 43: very much, Deputy Chief. We appreciate
02:04:48 Speaker 43: your introduction to that transition system.
02:04:50 Speaker 43: But the Director McNabb will hold
02:04:54 Speaker 43: on to you for one more
02:04:55 Speaker 43: for item seven D. It's recommended
02:04:57 Speaker 43: that report PSRCW0526 regarding the twenty.
02:04:59 Speaker 43: Regarding the 2025 Land Ambulance Service
02:05:02 Speaker 43: review results, be received for information.
02:05:04 Speaker 43: May I ask for a move
02:05:08 Speaker 43: in a second? Moved by Councillor
02:05:10 Speaker 43: Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Kevney. It's
02:05:12 Speaker 43: on the floor for discussion. Director
02:05:15 Speaker 43: McNab, the lectern is yours. Good
02:05:19 Speaker 43: morning again, Warden and County Council.
02:05:21 Speaker 43: Really happy to be here today
02:05:24 Speaker 43: to talk about this. The results
02:05:26 Speaker 43: of our last service review. Every
02:05:28 Speaker 43: three years, we go through a
02:05:30 Speaker 43: service review here. It lasts a
02:05:32 Speaker 43: couple of days and. the last
02:05:33 Speaker 43: one that took place was last
02:05:35 Speaker 43: October on the fifteenth and sixteenth.
02:05:36 Speaker 43: It's held by the or performed
02:05:37 Speaker 43: by the Ministry of Health Emergency
02:05:42 Speaker 43: Health Regulatory and Accountability Branch, and
02:05:44 Speaker 43: again they spend a couple days
02:05:46 Speaker 43: on site, more or less going
02:05:49 Speaker 43: through our entire service, looking at
02:05:51 Speaker 43: patient care, quality assurance, administration. Literally,
02:05:54 Speaker 43: I would say thousands of data
02:05:57 Speaker 43: points. They have a team
02:06:00 Speaker 43: lead, and then they have a
02:06:02 Speaker 43: management lead and a paramedic lead.
02:06:04 Speaker 43: They also bring somebody from fleet
02:06:07 Speaker 43: services from the ministry to look
02:06:08 Speaker 43: at our vehicles, and then they
02:06:10 Speaker 43: also bring paramedics to look at
02:06:12 Speaker 43: multiple factors from the bases to
02:06:16 Speaker 43: the vehicles to the. They go
02:06:19 Speaker 43: to the hospitals to look at
02:06:21 Speaker 43: patient care. They audit our ACRs,
02:06:22 Speaker 43: so they really go through all
02:06:24 Speaker 43: more or less every entity of
02:06:25 Speaker 43: the service delivery that we offer
02:06:26 Speaker 43: here, and they compare it to
02:06:27 Speaker 43: the standard and the regulations that
02:06:30 Speaker 43: we must follow to operate an
02:06:33 Speaker 43: ambulance service. So the Rio come,
02:06:34 Speaker 43: we met all the requirements from.
02:06:35 Speaker 43: We met all the requirements of
02:06:37 Speaker 43: the Ministry of Health Service Review,
02:06:39 Speaker 43: and we were recommended for a
02:06:41 Speaker 43: three-year extension of their of our
02:06:43 Speaker 43: licence, and that was in June
02:06:45 Speaker 43: of this year. We did get
02:06:47 Speaker 43: observations. There was nine in total.
02:06:50 Speaker 43: Four of them were around documentation.
02:06:52 Speaker 43: We also had an observation around
02:06:54 Speaker 43: deployment in regards to staffing and
02:06:55 Speaker 43: meeting the deployment plan. We had
02:06:58 Speaker 43: a paramedic that had an immunization.
02:06:59 Speaker 43: that was didn't have a signature
02:07:00 Speaker 43: on it, but was corrected. A
02:07:01 Speaker 43: paramedic that didn't have their ID
02:07:03 Speaker 43: on their person. It was a
02:07:04 Speaker 43: bit of a contention that was
02:07:05 Speaker 43: in their in her sweater and
02:07:06 Speaker 43: inside the base, but it wasn't
02:07:09 Speaker 43: on her person. But, anyways, was
02:07:11 Speaker 43: fine. Loose equipment behind the vehicles,
02:07:13 Speaker 43: gloves and stuff like that, and
02:07:14 Speaker 43: four, and then a couple around
02:07:16 Speaker 43: egress stickers and some certification documents
02:07:18 Speaker 43: that we just had to fix
02:07:21 Speaker 43: up. So the observations primarily relate
02:07:22 Speaker 43: to the staffing, documentation, and administrative
02:07:23 Speaker 43: processes. None of the observations prevented
02:07:25 Speaker 43: the renewal, and we submitted all
02:07:26 Speaker 43: our responses, corrected everything that was
02:07:28 Speaker 43: identified, mostly at the time, and
02:07:28 Speaker 43: then also over the period of
02:07:30 Speaker 43: time between the review of the
02:07:32 Speaker 43: summary report and the final report.
02:07:34 Speaker 43: We we built this the service
02:07:36 Speaker 43: here around the regulation and standards.
02:07:38 Speaker 43: Everything that we do revolves around.
02:07:49 Speaker 43: them. All our processes and all
02:07:50 Speaker 43: the things that we have in
02:07:52 Speaker 03: place are to meet them day
02:07:53 Speaker 03: in and day out. And I
02:07:56 Speaker 21: think that speaks to the work
02:07:57 Speaker 21: that the paramedics do, the supervisors,
02:08:00 Speaker 21: the managers, the administrative staff, and
02:08:02 Speaker 21: then also the support that comes
02:08:04 Speaker 21: from county council and the SMT
02:08:05 Speaker 21: and all the departments. Got to
02:08:06 Speaker 21: give a shout out to our
02:08:07 Speaker 21: maintenance staff that maintain our vehicles
02:08:11 Speaker 21: top notch and all our equipment.
02:08:13 Speaker 21: Do the testing on it, and
02:08:14 Speaker 21: then whether it's IT or finance
02:08:15 Speaker 21: or clerks, you know, that are
02:08:17 Speaker 21: Clerks, you know, their agreements. We
02:08:19 Speaker 21: touch almost every department in this
02:08:24 Speaker 10: county, and it makes a difference
02:08:29 Speaker 10: when it comes to the service
02:08:31 Speaker 10: review. There's a lot of work
02:08:32 Speaker 10: to get ready for it, but
02:08:35 Speaker 10: really, what it is is just
02:08:37 Speaker 10: looking at all the evidence that
02:08:39 Speaker 10: we do over the last three
02:08:42 Speaker 10: years to be able to show
02:08:44 Speaker 10: them all our processes and what
02:08:46 Speaker 10: we have in place. So, really
02:08:47 Speaker 10: happy for the team. It was
02:08:49 Speaker 10: very successful, even though we had
02:08:50 Speaker 10: some observations. But I would say
02:08:51 Speaker 10: it just an excellent job all
02:08:52 Speaker 10: around. So, and we we continue
02:08:54 Speaker 10: to learn from these observations. and
02:08:55 Speaker 10: put things in place to help
02:08:58 Speaker 10: shore it up. I don't know
02:08:59 Speaker 10: if we'll ever get rid of
02:09:00 Speaker 10: the documentation. I hope someday that
02:09:03 Speaker 10: we will, but I don't think
02:09:07 Speaker 10: so. So there's always going to
02:09:10 Speaker 10: be something that they'll find when
02:09:12 Speaker 10: they're auditing multiple data points on
02:09:14 Speaker 10: an ambulance call report. But again,
02:09:18 Speaker 10: we'll continue to to try to
02:09:21 Speaker 10: make that better each time, and
02:09:25 Speaker 10: make it a service that everybody's
02:09:26 Speaker 10: proud of. Thank you. very much,
02:09:29 Speaker 10: and thank you for highlighting that
02:09:33 Speaker 10: it it's it's a teamwork in
02:09:35 Speaker 10: progress to make sure that all
02:09:36 Speaker 10: the the various departments contribute to
02:09:39 Speaker 10: that success that you've that you've
02:09:41 Speaker 10: described. So congratulations to your participation,
02:09:43 Speaker 10: but thank you also for mentioning
02:09:45 Speaker 10: the other departments. I understand the
02:09:47 Speaker 10: deputy Cao would like to have
02:09:48 Speaker 10: a few words before I open
02:09:49 Speaker 10: it to committee. The whole members.
02:09:51 Speaker 10: Thank you very much, Madam Warden.
02:09:53 Speaker 10: So over the last year or
02:09:55 Speaker 10: so, as I've had the opportunity
02:09:58 Speaker 10: to work with with Kevin and
02:10:00 Speaker 10: members of Kevin's team, Kevin comes
02:10:02 Speaker 10: across as an incredibly quiet-spoken gentleman.
02:10:04 Speaker 10: He he effuses modesty when it
02:10:05 Speaker 10: comes to the service. We discussed
02:10:15 Speaker 10: whether or not to even put
02:10:17 Speaker 10: those nine things in. These are
02:10:18 Speaker 10: nine things where somebody had a
02:10:20 Speaker 10: a card in a sweater that
02:10:24 Speaker 21: wasn't on their person at the
02:10:28 Speaker 21: time. These are very very minor
02:10:29 Speaker 21: things that the team spent a
02:10:31 Speaker 21: week looking. for. I had
02:10:36 Speaker 21: the opportunity to delve in and
02:10:45 Speaker 55: meet the team that came in
02:10:46 Speaker 55: to start the inspection work, and
02:10:50 Speaker 55: I met them at the start
02:10:53 Speaker 43: and I met them at the
02:10:55 Speaker 43: end, and I saw the midway
02:10:57 Speaker 43: through. And midway through this room
02:11:00 Speaker 43: here, the table was covered from
02:11:02 Speaker 43: one end to the other with
02:11:03 Speaker 43: pieces of paper that they were
02:11:05 Speaker 43: slifting through and looking for things
02:11:06 Speaker 43: that the the team can improve
02:11:09 Speaker 43: on. Kevin leads an incredible team
02:11:11 Speaker 43: of of both his management team
02:11:13 Speaker 43: and the front line par. And
02:11:16 Speaker 43: the frontline paramedics do an outstanding
02:11:19 Speaker 43: body of work. This we present
02:11:20 Speaker 43: this report in in Kevin's modest
02:11:22 Speaker 43: tenure and tone, but this is
02:11:24 Speaker 43: a shining example of what Grey
02:11:26 Speaker 43: County does incredibly well. We have
02:11:28 Speaker 43: a paramedic team that, as a
02:11:30 Speaker 43: council, I am sure and I
02:11:33 Speaker 43: know you are proud of, and
02:11:36 Speaker 43: this report really does offer glowing
02:11:38 Speaker 43: praise for the work of Kevin.
02:11:39 Speaker 43: Kevin's management team, and every single
02:11:41 Speaker 43: one of our frontline paramedics that
02:11:43 Speaker 43: provide daily service inside and out
02:11:46 Speaker 43: to members of community at Gray
02:11:48 Speaker 43: County. And so, I'd like to
02:11:50 Speaker 43: offer my congratulations as well to
02:11:51 Speaker 43: Kevin on an outstanding job. And
02:11:54 Speaker 43: hopefully, I have been a little
02:11:56 Speaker 43: conveyed some of my enthusiasm for
02:11:58 Speaker 43: the work of Kevin and his
02:11:59 Speaker 43: team, and and tried to beat
02:12:00 Speaker 43: down some of Kevin's modesty on
02:12:03 Speaker 43: this one because it really is
02:12:04 Speaker 43: a triumph. Excellent, thank you. So
02:12:07 Speaker 43: let me open it up to
02:12:08 Speaker 43: the floor for questions or comments.
02:12:10 Speaker 43: We'll begin with alternate Councillor Cupcake.
02:12:11 Speaker 43: Thank you, Warden, and to you,
02:12:13 Speaker 43: Kevin. Congratulations as well, extended on
02:12:15 Speaker 43: your service that you do provide.
02:12:17 Speaker 43: My questions regarding the first observation
02:12:18 Speaker 43: deployment, staffing, and maintaining sufficient staff.
02:12:19 Speaker 43: How is that being handled? Staffing
02:12:21 Speaker 43: over the last five years, I'd
02:12:22 Speaker 43: say since COVID, has been difficult.
02:12:26 Speaker 43: Attracting staff, you know, getting staff
02:12:27 Speaker 43: to to work, you know, is
02:12:28 Speaker 43: still to meet the needs. The
02:12:31 Speaker 43: deployment plan, it has been tough.
02:12:33 Speaker 43: And so, when you look at
02:12:34 Speaker 43: the numbers, we're filling between ninety
02:12:36 Speaker 43: six to ninety seven percent of
02:12:39 Speaker 43: the shifts, but we're still not
02:12:40 Speaker 43: one hundred percent. We're still not
02:12:41 Speaker 43: 100. So, but so so, but
02:12:42 Speaker 43: we continue to work on that.
02:12:46 Speaker 43: The way we do things here,
02:12:48 Speaker 43: we have we offer overtime on
02:12:50 Speaker 43: areas where we have known where
02:12:51 Speaker 43: we sometimes have more absences, like
02:12:56 Speaker 43: on weekends. We, if we can,
02:12:58 Speaker 43: we upstaff ahead of time with
02:13:01 Speaker 56: some people to try to absorb
02:13:04 Speaker 56: those first number of book offs
02:13:05 Speaker 56: to be able to maintain. We
02:13:06 Speaker 56: can pull from our CP programme.
02:13:10 Speaker 56: We have supervisors that can work.
02:13:12 Speaker 21: We have on call that comes
02:13:14 Speaker 21: in. We have managers to back
02:13:17 Speaker 21: up. I came in at Christmas.
02:13:18 Speaker 21: You know, I mean, I just
02:13:20 Speaker 21: it's ongoing. I must say though,
02:13:21 Speaker 21: every year it gets better. We
02:13:24 Speaker 21: went through this in 2004. I
02:13:26 Speaker 21: would say it was probably worse
02:13:27 Speaker 21: then. We're coming out of it.
02:13:28 Speaker 21: It's not over yet. We're not
02:13:31 Speaker 21: like unlike other places. There may
02:13:34 Speaker 21: be some services in Ontario that
02:13:36 Speaker 21: aren't having trouble, but I would
02:13:38 Speaker 21: say most are still having trouble
02:13:39 Speaker 21: or or just coming. out of
02:13:42 Speaker 21: it as well. I just and
02:13:44 Speaker 21: also through this we've had growth,
02:13:47 Speaker 21: and I just kind of anticipated
02:13:49 Speaker 21: maybe a question around this, so
02:13:52 Speaker 21: I did write some numbers just
02:13:55 Speaker 21: to have available. Like so far
02:13:57 Speaker 21: this year, we're still sitting around
02:13:59 Speaker 21: ninety six and a half percent
02:14:01 Speaker 21: of the shifts that we're filling,
02:14:04 Speaker 21: three and a half that we're
02:14:10 Speaker 21: not. That equals to two hundred
02:14:13 Speaker 21: seventy four. But I go back
02:14:16 Speaker 21: in the last two years, we've
02:14:18 Speaker 21: added twenty five hundred and fifty
02:14:21 Speaker 21: five shifts, so we're still twenty
02:14:23 Speaker 21: two hundred more than we were.
02:14:26 Speaker 21: two years ago at this time
02:14:28 Speaker 21: when we had downsizing, so it
02:14:29 Speaker 21: is not fixed yet. But we
02:14:31 Speaker 21: are working on it. At one
02:14:35 Speaker 21: time, we used to only hire
02:14:39 Speaker 21: once a year, now we hire
02:14:41 Speaker 21: twice a year. But but each
02:14:45 Speaker 21: year gets better. And again, we
02:14:48 Speaker 21: have we. I would say we're
02:14:49 Speaker 21: coming out of it, but but
02:14:52 Speaker 21: we're not out of it yet.
02:14:55 Speaker 21: Okay. Thank you. Any further questions
02:14:57 Speaker 21: or comments? Okay. I'm not seeing
02:14:59 Speaker 21: any. further hands. All those in
02:15:02 Speaker 21: favour? That motion is carried. Thank
02:15:05 Speaker 21: you again, and thank you to
02:15:06 Speaker 21: all of your team. So with
02:15:09 Speaker 21: that, yes, appropriately, with ten minutes
02:15:13 Speaker 21: before we know our lunch is
02:15:15 Speaker 21: about to to arrive, I'm going
02:15:17 Speaker 21: to read out the recommended motion.
02:15:19 Speaker 21: That might take me five minutes
02:15:21 Speaker 21: because this one's a little bit
02:15:23 Speaker 21: long, and it's not a not
02:15:26 Speaker 21: a committee committee motion where I
02:15:29 Speaker 21: can refer to what's already been
02:15:32 Speaker 21: published. I think this one needs
02:15:34 Speaker 21: to be read for clarity. so
02:15:37 Speaker 21: it is recommended that report PDR
02:15:40 Speaker 21: CW thirty four twenty six be
02:15:42 Speaker 21: received and that the land exchange
02:15:44 Speaker 21: between the county and the township
02:15:46 Speaker 21: of Southgate for nominal consideration for
02:15:48 Speaker 21: the following lands abutting the CP
02:15:51 Speaker 21: rail trail in Dundalk be approved
02:15:53 Speaker 21: to align with the township
02:15:58 Speaker 21: of Southgate's long term plans for
02:15:59 Speaker 21: the section of Dundalk, the town,
02:16:00 Speaker 21: the county lands described as part
02:16:04 Speaker 21: of Lot two to nine concession
02:16:08 Speaker 21: two. nine concession two southwest of
02:16:10 Speaker 21: the Toronto and Sydney Road, being
02:16:13 Speaker 21: part one in the attached draft
02:16:16 Speaker 21: reference plan, be transferred to Southgate.
02:16:18 Speaker 21: The township lands described as part
02:16:20 Speaker 21: of lot two two nine concession
02:16:23 Speaker 30: two southwest of the Toronto and
02:16:24 Speaker 30: Sydney Road, being parts thirteen twelve
02:16:25 Speaker 30: and thirteen in the attached reference
02:16:27 Speaker 30: plan, be transferred to the county,
02:16:30 Speaker 30: and that the county waive the
02:16:32 Speaker 30: requirement for a bylaw to execute
02:16:34 Speaker 30: the land transfer agreement as set
02:16:37 Speaker 30: out in the county's sale of
02:16:39 Speaker 30: land procedure GGEN zero three zero
02:16:41 Speaker 30: zero three zero zero one and
02:16:44 Speaker 30: acquisition of land procedure GGEN zero
02:16:46 Speaker 30: zero three zero zero two and
02:16:48 Speaker 30: any successor thereto, and that the
02:16:50 Speaker 30: warden and clerk be authorised to
02:16:52 Speaker 30: execute the land exchange agreement once
02:16:55 Speaker 30: finalized, and that the staff be
02:16:57 Speaker 30: directed to incorporate language into the
02:16:58 Speaker 30: language the land exchange agreement to
02:17:00 Speaker 30: address the cost sharing arrangements between
02:17:01 Speaker 30: the county and Southgate that were
02:17:03 Speaker 30: previously outlined in the cost sharing
02:17:05 Speaker 30: agreement dated October 6, 2021, to
02:17:08 Speaker 30: the extent required based on the
02:17:10 Speaker 30: new long-term plans for this area
02:17:12 Speaker 30: of Dundalk, and that staff be
02:17:13 Speaker 30: directed to release various parcels of
02:17:16 Speaker 30: land from the cost sharing agreement
02:17:18 Speaker 30: registered in the land. Registry Office
02:17:20 Speaker 30: of Gray, number sixteen, as instrument
02:17:21 Speaker 30: GY two one five zero three
02:17:22 Speaker 30: zero, as deemed necessary to effect
02:17:24 Speaker 30: the long-term plans for this area
02:17:27 Speaker 30: of Dundalk, and deemed appropriate through
02:17:29 Speaker 30: consultation with the Director of Planning,
02:17:31 Speaker 30: CAO and Deputy CAO, and the
02:17:33 Speaker 30: County Solicitor, and that staff be
02:17:35 Speaker 30: authorised to carry out the above
02:17:37 Speaker 30: prior to the County Council approval,
02:17:39 Speaker 30: as per Section twenty six point
02:17:41 Speaker 30: six. Twenty-six point six B of
02:17:43 Speaker 30: our procedural bylaw fifty-one thirty-four twenty-two.
02:17:46 Speaker 30: May I ask for a mover
02:17:48 Speaker 30: and a second? er Moved by
02:17:49 Speaker 30: the deputy warden. Looking, yeah, that's
02:17:52 Speaker 30: right. Could you repeat that? And
02:17:54 Speaker 30: seconded by by Councillor Dobreen. It's
02:17:56 Speaker 30: now on the floor for discussion.
02:17:58 Speaker 30: Welcome, Director Taylor, to the lectern.
02:18:00 Speaker 30: Thanks, Madam Warden, and and this
02:18:02 Speaker 30: report was truly a team effort
02:18:04 Speaker 30: between Legal Services. clerks and planning,
02:18:06 Speaker 30: the downside of a team effort
02:18:08 Speaker 30: between legal services clerks and planning
02:18:11 Speaker 30: is you get emotion, like you
02:18:14 Speaker 30: just read. So, appreciate your patience.
02:18:18 Speaker 30: This is just very briefly following
02:18:19 Speaker 30: up on a past closed session
02:18:21 Speaker 30: discussion where staff received direction back
02:18:23 Speaker 30: in September 2025, and that was
02:18:25 Speaker 30: to work with Township of Southgate
02:18:27 Speaker 30: staff to investigate a potential land
02:18:29 Speaker 30: swap, if you will. And these
02:18:31 Speaker 30: lands are alongside the CP rail
02:18:34 Speaker 30: trail, as we talked about earlier
02:18:36 Speaker 30: in. council, rate in in downtown
02:18:37 Speaker 30: Dundalk, and essentially the county would
02:18:40 Speaker 30: be would be trading lands sort
02:18:43 Speaker 30: of on on the east side
02:18:45 Speaker 30: of the trail for lands on
02:18:47 Speaker 30: the west side of the trail
02:18:48 Speaker 30: with the township. And as some
02:18:50 Speaker 30: might recall, there was a land
02:18:52 Speaker 30: donation agreement done back in 2021
02:18:56 Speaker 30: when the township was looking at
02:18:58 Speaker 30: a new medical clinic in this
02:19:02 Speaker 30: area, and there were some commitments
02:19:04 Speaker 30: through that land donation agreement that
02:19:05 Speaker 30: that Southgate took on as part
02:19:08 Speaker 30: of that agreement. in speaking further
02:19:09 Speaker 30: with township staff, there are some
02:19:12 Speaker 30: of those commitments that are no
02:19:16 Speaker 30: longer relevant now that the medical
02:19:18 Speaker 30: clinic plans might be changed. And
02:19:20 Speaker 30: as such, through this this motion
02:19:24 Speaker 30: and this report, we're looking for
02:19:26 Speaker 30: some leeway to to release some
02:19:27 Speaker 30: of those commitments, but but still
02:19:29 Speaker 30: continue on with some, including some
02:19:32 Speaker 30: of the trail upgrades and and
02:19:33 Speaker 30: the the need for exploration of
02:19:35 Speaker 30: future parking in this area. Council
02:19:36 Speaker 30: may recall there was a further
02:19:37 Speaker 30: land sale to Midwest Co-op in
02:19:38 Speaker 30: 2024. That sale has been completed,
02:19:40 Speaker 30: and and the old mill building
02:19:40 Speaker 30: just near here has since been
02:19:44 Speaker 30: torn down. So Southgate staff took
02:19:46 Speaker 30: this this matter to their council
02:19:47 Speaker 30: on August 5th. At that time,
02:19:49 Speaker 21: Southgate staff outlined sort of the
02:19:53 Speaker 21: long term plans for this area,
02:19:57 Speaker 21: including a series of of potential
02:19:58 Speaker 21: changes between the county and township,
02:20:02 Speaker 21: which we're hearing about today, and
02:20:05 Speaker 27: also further discussions between the the
02:20:08 Speaker 27: township and and Midwest Co-op in
02:20:10 Speaker 27: that regard. With that report. township
02:20:14 Speaker 27: council supported this this land swap,
02:20:17 Speaker 27: and if you will, the the
02:20:19 Speaker 27: lands really are a like for
02:20:22 Speaker 27: like, and they're being traded in
02:20:25 Speaker 27: in an as is condition. The
02:20:28 Speaker 27: only reason why on map two
02:20:30 Speaker 27: the lands look slightly larger that
02:20:33 Speaker 27: the county is getting is because
02:20:40 Speaker 27: part twelve currently contains a small
02:20:42 Speaker 27: hydro easement. So in order for
02:20:44 Speaker 27: for the county to get a
02:20:48 Speaker 27: similar size parcel, which is part
02:20:50 Speaker 27: thirteen to part one, which they're
02:20:52 Speaker 57: trading, we we didn't. count those
02:20:54 Speaker 57: those hydro easement lands in the
02:20:57 Speaker 57: total, and then finally the reason
02:20:59 Speaker 57: for the motion being quite as
02:21:01 Speaker 57: long as it is is because
02:21:03 Speaker 57: we are coming up to the
02:21:05 Speaker 57: restricted acts deadline under the Municipal
02:21:07 Speaker 57: Act, and and to make sure
02:21:09 Speaker 57: we're we're keeping with with the
02:21:12 Speaker 57: legislative requirements in this regard, we've
02:21:15 Speaker 57: consulted with both the clerk and
02:21:18 Speaker 57: legal services, and as such, there's
02:21:19 Speaker 57: clauses in the in the motion
02:21:21 Speaker 57: which, if supported today, would allow
02:21:23 Speaker 57: for this this land transfer agreement
02:21:24 Speaker 57: or land exchange agreement to be
02:21:27 Speaker 57: finalized without the need for a
02:21:29 Speaker 57: bylaw coming back to council. There
02:21:31 Speaker 57: is documentation in the report, the
02:21:33 Speaker 57: direction under which staff would be
02:21:35 Speaker 57: would be negotiating that agreement. So
02:21:37 Speaker 57: if council supports this recommendation here
02:21:41 Speaker 57: today, it would it would simply
02:21:45 Speaker 57: not require that bylaw. With that,
02:21:46 Speaker 57: I am happy to turn it
02:21:48 Speaker 57: back to you, Madam Warden. But
02:21:49 Speaker 57: I just note that we have
02:21:52 Speaker 30: both the clerk and Ms. Lacey
02:21:54 Speaker 30: Thompson and in the back. Is
02:21:56 Speaker 30: Lacy Thompson in in the back?
02:21:57 Speaker 30: If there are any technical questions,
02:21:59 Speaker 30: thank you. Okay, thank you for
02:22:01 Speaker 30: that introduction. So, with that, I'll
02:22:03 Speaker 30: put it out to committee. The
02:22:06 Speaker 30: whole, any questions or comments? Okay,
02:22:07 Speaker 30: we'll go to Councillor Eccles. Just
02:22:08 Speaker 30: for clarity, the reason that we're
02:22:11 Speaker 30: not doing the bylaws because of
02:22:13 Speaker 30: lame duck period may or may
02:22:16 Speaker 30: not kick in, but if we
02:22:19 Speaker 30: did the motion today. to prepare
02:22:21 Speaker 30: the bylaw, would that not step
02:22:24 Speaker 30: ahead? That it was granted to
02:22:26 Speaker 30: be prepared before lame duck. I
02:22:27 Speaker 30: guess it's a timing issue. I
02:22:30 Speaker 30: just feel a little at ease
02:22:33 Speaker 30: that we do everything by bylaw,
02:22:35 Speaker 30: and yet on something that is
02:22:37 Speaker 30: at that time sensitive, that we
02:22:39 Speaker 30: need to bypass that procedure. Okay,
02:22:41 Speaker 30: so I think I'm going to
02:22:43 Speaker 30: begin with the quorum. I will
02:22:46 Speaker 30: start with Madam Quorum. Thank you,
02:22:49 Speaker 30: and to you, Madam Warden. As
02:22:50 Speaker 30: staff, I think we can relate
02:22:57 Speaker 30: to your somewhat discomfort in proceeding
02:22:58 Speaker 30: without a bylaw. However, my understanding
02:23:00 Speaker 30: is that this is a time-sensitive
02:23:01 Speaker 30: matter. But perhaps Director Taylor could
02:23:03 Speaker 21: elabourate on that a little bit.
02:23:04 Speaker 21: This is the last regular meeting
02:23:07 Speaker 21: that we have scheduled. for County
02:23:09 Speaker 21: Council before we may go into
02:23:14 Speaker 21: the lame duck position next Friday
02:23:16 Speaker 21: on the 21st, and the next
02:23:17 Speaker 21: meeting would be September 10th. So
02:23:18 Speaker 21: the bylaw would be the final
02:23:20 Speaker 21: step in that approval process, having
02:23:21 Speaker 21: it passed by County Council. And
02:23:23 Speaker 21: unfortunately, if we are in a
02:23:25 Speaker 21: lame duck position in September, that
02:23:28 Speaker 21: bylaw isn't able to be passed
02:23:31 Speaker 21: because it's one of the restricted
02:23:33 Speaker 21: acts in the Municipal Act. So
02:23:35 Speaker 21: this is the the last possible.
02:23:37 Speaker 21: time, staff we felt we could
02:23:41 Speaker 21: bring it forward and still fit
02:23:43 Speaker 21: the legislative framework that we're working
02:23:47 Speaker 21: with. Okay, Director Taylor, did you
02:23:49 Speaker 21: want to add anything to that?
02:23:52 Speaker 21: Sure, thank you, Madam. I don't
02:23:55 Speaker 21: have a lot to add here.
02:23:56 Speaker 21: I will say that that both
02:23:57 Speaker 21: the clerk and and legal services
02:23:58 Speaker 21: department were were very helpful in
02:23:59 Speaker 21: this, and we talked about
02:24:01 Speaker 21: all options, including would we schedule
02:24:03 Speaker 21: a separate county council meeting after
02:24:07 Speaker 21: this ahead of. ahead of that
02:24:12 Speaker 21: restricted acts period, in this case,
02:24:14 Speaker 21: the reason staff put this forward
02:24:15 Speaker 21: on the agenda day is because
02:24:18 Speaker 21: we had had that past full
02:24:21 Speaker 21: session discussion approximately a year ago,
02:24:23 Speaker 58: so September 2025, and we do
02:24:27 Speaker 58: understand in in talking with the
02:24:30 Speaker 58: the township that this is a
02:24:31 Speaker 58: small piece of of the larger
02:24:33 Speaker 58: plans for downtown Dundalk, some of
02:24:35 Speaker 58: which are time sensitive on their
02:24:38 Speaker 58: end. So while this might not
02:24:40 Speaker 58: be a extreme time sensitive
02:24:43 Speaker 58: priority to Time-sensitive priority to to
02:24:45 Speaker 58: the county of Gray. We think
02:24:46 Speaker 58: in in in working with the
02:24:48 Speaker 58: township as as a municipal partner,
02:24:50 Speaker 58: and certainly through the warden. Invite
02:24:50 Speaker 58: any comments from our our township
02:24:53 Speaker 58: of Southgate representatives here today. We
02:24:54 Speaker 58: thought it was best to to
02:24:55 Speaker 58: put this on on the agenda
02:24:58 Speaker 58: for council's consideration to to see
02:25:01 Speaker 58: to see the feedback here today.
02:25:03 Speaker 58: Okay. Anything else? All right. I
02:25:06 Speaker 58: don't see any further hands. Then
02:25:08 Speaker 58: you have the information. Then we
02:25:13 Speaker 58: have the information in front of
02:25:15 Speaker 58: us. I'll call the question. All
02:25:18 Speaker 58: those in favour, and that motion
02:25:20 Speaker 58: is carried. Thank you very much,
02:25:25 Speaker 58: Director Taylor, and Madam Clerk. I'll
02:25:27 Speaker 58: just consult with you in terms
02:25:29 Speaker 58: of timing. Okay, so at some
02:25:32 Speaker 58: point we will break for lunch
02:25:34 Speaker 58: when we know that it's arrived,
02:25:36 Speaker 58: but we're going to keep working
02:25:38 Speaker 58: until that happens. So with that,
02:25:42 Speaker 58: then I would like to go
02:25:43 Speaker 58: to item seven F, and it
02:25:45 Speaker 58: is recommended that staff report PDR
02:25:48 Speaker 58: CW twenty eight twenty six. W.2826
02:25:50 Speaker 58: regarding the pursuit of an upper
02:25:52 Speaker 58: tier community improvement plan for Gray
02:25:56 Speaker 58: County be received, and that the
02:25:59 Speaker 58: committee, the whole hereby direct staff
02:26:01 Speaker 58: to add the county CIP
02:26:03 Speaker 58: as a project within the ten-year
02:26:06 Speaker 58: capital budget from 2027 to 2036
02:26:09 Speaker 58: for the planning department to include
02:26:11 Speaker 58: it within the development charges background
02:26:13 Speaker 58: study, and we'll hear from Senior
02:26:14 Speaker 58: Policy Planner Buckton in just a
02:26:15 Speaker 58: moment. I'll ask for a move.
02:26:17 Speaker 58: A moment. I'll ask for a
02:26:19 Speaker 58: mover and a seconder to get
02:26:22 Speaker 58: it on the floor. We've got
02:26:24 Speaker 58: it moved by Councillor Dobrines, seconded
02:26:26 Speaker 58: by alternate Councillor Kepke. It's now
02:26:29 Speaker 58: on the floor for discussion. Welcome.
02:26:31 Speaker 58: What might be just ahead of
02:26:34 Speaker 58: lunch? Thank you so very much.
02:26:35 Speaker 58: The listeners are going to get
02:26:37 Speaker 58: a reputation here, right? Thank you
02:26:39 Speaker 58: so much. Really glad to be
02:26:41 Speaker 58: here today. Are you able to
02:26:44 Speaker 58: control that for me, Erin? Or
02:26:46 Speaker 58: yep, okay. amazing. Thank you. So
02:26:49 Speaker 58: we will be brief in the
02:26:52 Speaker 58: event that lunch just arrives the
02:26:56 Speaker 58: second I started talking. There is
02:26:58 Speaker 58: Murphy's law, and dictates. So we'll
02:27:00 Speaker 58: we'll jump right in. So as
02:27:04 Speaker 58: you noted, the report focuses around
02:27:06 Speaker 58: community improvement plans and and contemplating
02:27:08 Speaker 58: a plan for Gray County at
02:27:10 Speaker 58: the upper tier level. I thought
02:27:12 Speaker 58: I'd better start where where we
02:27:13 Speaker 58: usually need to start, which is
02:27:16 Speaker 58: what is a community improvement plan.
02:27:19 Speaker 58: I think those around this table
02:27:23 Speaker 58: will know. but for anybody else
02:27:26 Speaker 58: who may be watching or or
02:27:27 Speaker 58: listening in, a community improvement plan
02:27:28 Speaker 58: is a flexible tool under the
02:27:30 Speaker 58: Planning Act that allows municipalities to
02:27:32 Speaker 58: offer targeted incentives to support various
02:27:34 Speaker 58: different community projects or outcomes. Oftentimes,
02:27:37 Speaker 58: there are prohibitions, for example, within
02:27:40 Speaker 58: the Municipal Act around bonusing or
02:27:42 Speaker 58: or providing incentives, but this tool
02:27:46 Speaker 58: creates the framework within which we
02:27:47 Speaker 58: we can do so. legally, and
02:27:48 Speaker 58: so various different programme types can
02:27:50 Speaker 58: can be part of a community
02:27:53 Speaker 58: improvement plan. I know that councillors
02:27:54 Speaker 58: are familiar with the tax increment
02:27:57 Speaker 58: equivalent grants, and we've seen some
02:27:59 Speaker 58: of those at planning level in
02:28:01 Speaker 58: conjunction with lower tier CIP initiatives.
02:28:03 Speaker 58: There's a variety of other tools
02:28:05 Speaker 58: that can be enacted through CIPs,
02:28:06 Speaker 58: such as grants and loans, and
02:28:08 Speaker 58: the CIP document itself outlines the
02:28:12 Speaker 58: criteria. that would apply for eligibility
02:28:14 Speaker 58: and the programme itself. So the
02:28:16 Speaker 58: county has, since 2019, administered a
02:28:19 Speaker 58: countywide CAP programme, but that has
02:28:21 Speaker 58: been implemented through member municipalities and
02:28:23 Speaker 58: their local official plans. So up
02:28:25 Speaker 58: until just recently, upper tier
02:28:28 Speaker 58: municipalities required to be prescribed to
02:28:30 Speaker 58: have an upper tier CAP, and
02:28:32 Speaker 58: I might be getting a little
02:28:35 Speaker 58: ahead of myself, a slide or
02:28:37 Speaker 58: two, but that has changed with
02:28:40 Speaker 58: Bill 60, and we can now.
02:28:42 Speaker 58: have an upper tier plan. So
02:28:44 Speaker 58: through the existing programme, the county
02:28:47 Speaker 58: has supported local municipalities with the
02:28:50 Speaker 58: CIP programme design. We've provided a
02:28:52 Speaker 58: templated document, kind of outlining how
02:28:53 Speaker 58: those CIPs might be structured. We've
02:28:55 Speaker 58: supported with some coordination and monitoring,
02:28:58 Speaker 58: and I know Savannah's team keeps
02:29:01 Speaker 58: some stats and does reporting back
02:29:03 Speaker 58: to town council around our participation
02:29:05 Speaker 58: with those programmemes as well. And
02:29:06 Speaker 58: we have offered and and and
02:29:09 Speaker 58: do offer aligned heritage tax rebates.
02:29:12 Speaker 58: and tax incremental equivalent grants, again
02:29:13 Speaker 58: for those local CIPs supported projects.
02:29:15 Speaker 58: As I noted, there has been
02:29:20 Speaker 58: changes to legislation that would allow
02:29:21 Speaker 58: for upper tier CIPs to to
02:29:23 Speaker 58: or sort of upper tier municipalities
02:29:26 Speaker 58: to have CIPs, but it is
02:29:27 Speaker 58: a scoped list of matters that
02:29:29 Speaker 58: those upper tier CIPs can address.
02:29:31 Speaker 58: So I've just listed those here
02:29:33 Speaker 58: on the slide, but would highlight
02:29:35 Speaker 58: affordable housing as being one. of
02:29:37 Speaker 58: those items in particular, also including
02:29:38 Speaker 58: infrastructure and lands and buildings with
02:29:40 Speaker 58: respect to transit corridors. So, also
02:29:42 Speaker 58: on the screen, we've got a
02:29:45 Speaker 58: lovely image there of the housing
02:29:47 Speaker 58: action plan. So that had been
02:29:48 Speaker 58: endorsed by County Council in 2023,
02:29:49 Speaker 58: and within that document, there is
02:29:54 Speaker 58: a stated intent to maintain those
02:29:56 Speaker 58: CIP-related incentives to support the local
02:29:59 Speaker 58: municipalities and to look at upper-tier
02:30:02 Speaker 58: complementary programmemes. When that plan was
02:30:04 Speaker 58: written, we didn't have the ability
02:30:05 Speaker 58: at that point in time to
02:30:07 Speaker 58: have an efforts here CIP. Although
02:30:10 Speaker 58: there had been interim reports over
02:30:13 Speaker 58: the past couple of years that
02:30:14 Speaker 58: have contemplated that idea, we had
02:30:17 Speaker 58: been seeking some direction to reach
02:30:19 Speaker 58: out to the province to determine
02:30:21 Speaker 58: how to be prescribed for a
02:30:23 Speaker 58: CIP around the time that Bill
02:30:25 Speaker 58: sixty was enacted and put that
02:30:26 Speaker 58: permission in place at any ease.
02:30:29 Speaker 58: So you know, I think CIPs
02:30:31 Speaker 58: are. are nimble tools. We can
02:30:33 Speaker 58: tailor it the way that that
02:30:34 Speaker 58: would be helpful for us. But
02:30:36 Speaker 58: through that lens of of applications
02:30:39 Speaker 58: to housing, I do think that
02:30:41 Speaker 58: a county CIP could really support
02:30:43 Speaker 58: that strategic targeting of incentives towards
02:30:44 Speaker 58: projects that we think are are
02:30:45 Speaker 58: needed to develop that more balanced
02:30:48 Speaker 58: housing mix. I think the market
02:30:50 Speaker 58: is definitely delivering the housing that
02:30:51 Speaker 58: the market can, but affordable housing
02:30:53 Speaker 58: in particular is very difficult. to
02:30:58 Speaker 58: pencil out, and not all creators
02:31:00 Speaker 58: of affordable housing have access to
02:31:02 Speaker 58: readily available capital or financial tools
02:31:03 Speaker 58: very early in their processes. And
02:31:06 Speaker 58: so, I think there could be
02:31:08 Speaker 58: some strategy around where we could
02:31:11 Speaker 58: place those incentives in the process
02:31:13 Speaker 58: to support those housing types we
02:31:15 Speaker 58: need. I think that CAP could
02:31:17 Speaker 58: create greater ease and flexibility as
02:31:21 Speaker 58: well for use of surplus municipal
02:31:23 Speaker 58: lands and partnerships around those lands.
02:31:26 Speaker 58: There are some provisions. within a
02:31:27 Speaker 58: CAP programme that you could create
02:31:30 Speaker 58: to allow for reduced cost transfers
02:31:33 Speaker 58: of lands, for example, for for
02:31:35 Speaker 58: projects. Could be looking again at
02:31:37 Speaker 58: targeting and filling those gaps in
02:31:40 Speaker 58: the other early funding opportunities to
02:31:41 Speaker 58: try and bring life to those
02:31:43 Speaker 58: projects that might otherwise struggle in
02:31:45 Speaker 58: the early phases. And then I
02:31:48 Speaker 58: think there is a great opportunity
02:31:49 Speaker 58: to to be looking at the
02:31:53 Speaker 58: at upper tier CAP in the
02:31:55 Speaker 58: context of there also being lower
02:31:58 Speaker 58: tier CAPs and. Lower tier CIPs,
02:32:00 Speaker 58: and how does that work together,
02:32:01 Speaker 58: and how do we tailor the
02:32:04 Speaker 58: staffing around the CIP and incentives?
02:32:06 Speaker 58: And so, I think there's a
02:32:08 Speaker 58: great opportunity to figure out how
02:32:11 Speaker 58: do we design that so that
02:32:12 Speaker 58: we can work together. So, we're
02:32:14 Speaker 58: bringing this forward not with a
02:32:19 Speaker 58: CIP prepared and ready to go,
02:32:20 Speaker 58: but suggesting that if if council
02:32:22 Speaker 58: would have an interest in pursuing
02:32:23 Speaker 58: an upper tier CIP, now might
02:32:25 Speaker 58: be an opportune time to. express
02:32:26 Speaker 58: that intent. We are undertaking the
02:32:28 Speaker 58: development charges background study, and so
02:32:30 Speaker 58: our thought was that if we
02:32:33 Speaker 58: were to receive endorsement to place
02:32:35 Speaker 58: this on the capital ten-year plan,
02:32:37 Speaker 58: we could be including some related
02:32:38 Speaker 58: costs within that development charges background
02:32:40 Speaker 58: study for funding at that future
02:32:43 Speaker 58: date when we pick up this
02:32:45 Speaker 58: project to move forward. We're anticipating,
02:32:46 Speaker 58: as well, from an alignment standpoint,
02:32:49 Speaker 58: that next year is likely the
02:32:51 Speaker 58: year that we'll be getting into
02:32:53 Speaker 58: an update to the. county official
02:32:55 Speaker 58: plan and beginning that process, and
02:32:57 Speaker 58: so we'll also be getting census
02:33:01 Speaker 58: data next year as well. And
02:33:03 Speaker 58: so I think there's potentially some
02:33:05 Speaker 58: alignment to be looking at the
02:33:07 Speaker 58: policy framework, updated data that might
02:33:09 Speaker 58: help us target that CIP and
02:33:10 Speaker 58: be thinking about where that CIP
02:33:13 Speaker 58: then ultimately goes in terms of
02:33:14 Speaker 58: design when we get there. So
02:33:17 Speaker 58: I have suggested within the report
02:33:19 Speaker 58: that I think there are some
02:33:22 Speaker 58: things that we do need to
02:33:25 Speaker 58: do in considering. a plan at
02:33:26 Speaker 58: the upper tier level. I've suggested
02:33:28 Speaker 58: that we phase this project in
02:33:30 Speaker 58: in the following ways. So, first
02:33:32 Speaker 58: off, starting with some analysis of
02:33:35 Speaker 58: those background data trends, needs, and
02:33:37 Speaker 58: gaps. The evaluation then of capacity
02:33:39 Speaker 58: considerations. So, who's delivering it at
02:33:41 Speaker 58: the county level? Staff resources.
02:33:44 Speaker 58: You know, all of the people
02:33:47 Speaker 58: that touch that, making sure that
02:33:50 Speaker 58: that we're adequately resourced, and then
02:33:53 Speaker 58: the actual development. of the
02:33:55 Speaker 58: programme itself, right through to the
02:33:58 Speaker 58: delivery of that bylaw for implementation.
02:34:00 Speaker 58: As what we've suggested within the
02:34:02 Speaker 58: financial section of the report is
02:34:04 Speaker 58: that we would look at likely
02:34:05 Speaker 58: those items A and B being
02:34:09 Speaker 58: an in-house activity where staff is
02:34:11 Speaker 58: doing that investigation and targeting, and
02:34:13 Speaker 58: then potentially engaging some consulting resources
02:34:14 Speaker 58: to help with the actual programme
02:34:16 Speaker 58: design. There are CIPs across Ontario,
02:34:18 Speaker 58: and so our thought is that
02:34:19 Speaker 58: there may be some. opportunities to
02:34:21 Speaker 58: to glean from those consultants some
02:34:22 Speaker 58: of those examples we may haven't
02:34:24 Speaker 58: engaged with elsewhere, but also then
02:34:26 Speaker 58: and being able to bring that
02:34:30 Speaker 58: in as a cost for some
02:34:32 Speaker 58: cost recovery through the development charges
02:34:36 Speaker 58: on a consulting basis. Um, in
02:34:38 Speaker 58: designing the CIP, and again, just
02:34:41 Speaker 58: a little foreshadowing of where we
02:34:42 Speaker 58: think we might go if council
02:34:43 Speaker 58: were on board, um, you know,
02:34:45 Speaker 58: we would really want to be
02:34:46 Speaker 58: considering those types of projects and
02:34:51 Speaker 58: organisations that. could be incented through
02:34:52 Speaker 58: that programme, we would want to
02:34:57 Speaker 58: use data-informed approaches because I think
02:35:03 Speaker 59: resources are limited all around, and
02:35:07 Speaker 59: so we'd want to be putting
02:35:09 Speaker 54: those incentives towards the specific projects
02:35:12 Speaker 54: that need that help. We'd want
02:35:16 Speaker 54: to direct the incentives towards the
02:35:19 Speaker 54: most impactful stage of development,
02:35:23 Speaker 54: and then look at scaling of
02:35:25 Speaker 54: those incentives. So, you know, I
02:35:31 Speaker 54: think the juice needs to be
02:35:33 Speaker 54: worth the squeeze for those development
02:35:35 Speaker 54: proponents. So, you know, if it's
02:35:38 Speaker 54: a matching fund grant, capping out
02:35:40 Speaker 54: at you know seven thousand dollars
02:35:44 Speaker 54: on a forty million dollar housing
02:35:47 Speaker 54: project, that's a very small drop
02:35:49 Speaker 54: in the bucket. But if we
02:35:52 Speaker 54: were able to offer a slightly
02:35:57 Speaker 54: more meaningful incentive at a key
02:35:58 Speaker 58: stage where there aren't other resources,
02:35:59 Speaker 58: we see you know being able
02:36:02 Speaker 58: to match the scale with that
02:36:04 Speaker 58: usability or or interest by the
02:36:06 Speaker 58: developers to take that. And then
02:36:08 Speaker 58: again, looking at that alignment with
02:36:10 Speaker 58: the. local CIPs, so I just
02:36:11 Speaker 58: wanted to mention here that
02:36:14 Speaker 58: we have had various discussions with
02:36:17 Speaker 58: local staff, and so we'd had
02:36:21 Speaker 58: a chat with UDOs earlier in
02:36:23 Speaker 58: the year, and I guess my
02:36:24 Speaker 58: takeaway from that was each of
02:36:27 Speaker 58: our municipalities is very differently resourced
02:36:29 Speaker 58: with capacity to deliver the CIPs,
02:36:32 Speaker 58: and so those types of initiatives
02:36:34 Speaker 58: that have agreements or monitoring conditions
02:36:36 Speaker 58: over time, like affordability conditions, that.
02:36:38 Speaker 58: Affordability conditions—that type of thing—may be
02:36:39 Speaker 58: challenging to accommodate in that that
02:36:41 Speaker 58: local resourcing. So again, there might
02:36:43 Speaker 58: be that opportunity to explore, you
02:36:44 Speaker 58: know, what tools are sitting in
02:36:47 Speaker 58: the county CIP versus the local.
02:36:49 Speaker 58: How are those working together? Maybe
02:36:50 Speaker 58: the the county is, you know,
02:36:52 Speaker 58: biting off a bigger chunk with
02:36:54 Speaker 58: those affordable housing ones, which allows
02:36:56 Speaker 58: the locals to focus a little
02:36:59 Speaker 58: more on, ah, dev or those
02:37:00 Speaker 58: types of initiatives. So just to
02:37:03 Speaker 58: say that I think there's a
02:37:04 Speaker 58: conversation there that we could explore.
02:37:06 Speaker 58: There that we explore around, you
02:37:08 Speaker 58: know, how we want to align
02:37:09 Speaker 58: those those CIPs. So just back
02:37:11 Speaker 58: to the beginning, the staff recommendation.
02:37:13 Speaker 58: So as noted, we provided a
02:37:15 Speaker 58: report that outlines all of this
02:37:18 Speaker 58: information, and our staff recommendation would
02:37:21 Speaker 58: be that we would proceed to
02:37:23 Speaker 58: put this on the capital plan
02:37:25 Speaker 58: and into the development charges background
02:37:31 Speaker 58: study. It's not just me there.
02:37:34 Speaker 58: Thank you. Thank you. So with
02:37:36 Speaker 58: that, I will look to committee.
02:37:41 Speaker 58: The whole members for questions or
02:37:44 Speaker 34: comments. Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, Warden,
02:37:46 Speaker 34: and thank you, Ms. I read
02:37:47 Speaker 34: this with great interest, and I
02:37:51 Speaker 34: know that at previously the county
02:37:53 Speaker 34: was looking at doing a land
02:37:54 Speaker 34: inventory to see which lands might
02:37:56 Speaker 34: be available for. affordable housing development
02:37:58 Speaker 34: that we could partner with other
02:38:00 Speaker 34: organisations. Would that land inventory play
02:38:03 Speaker 34: a role in this community improvement
02:38:06 Speaker 34: plan, as opposed to a financial
02:38:08 Speaker 34: incentive? There would be that that
02:38:08 Speaker 34: transfer of land or land lease
02:38:10 Speaker 34: or that type of thing. Thank
02:38:14 Speaker 34: you, and through through you, Madam
02:38:15 Speaker 34: Warden. Yes, so you know, I
02:38:17 Speaker 34: think. there are some interesting
02:38:19 Speaker 34: rules around municipal lands and associated
02:38:21 Speaker 34: marketing, and so you have to
02:38:24 Speaker 34: be of the same organisation to
02:38:26 Speaker 34: be able to do marketing for
02:38:28 Speaker 34: lands within your municipal ownership. So
02:38:28 Speaker 34: there's some some legislative rules around
02:38:30 Speaker 34: that, and so I think one
02:38:31 Speaker 34: of the ways that a CIP
02:38:32 Speaker 34: can can assist is where you
02:38:34 Speaker 34: do have those surplus lands inventoryed
02:38:35 Speaker 34: as as potential opportunities for affordable
02:38:38 Speaker 34: housing. Sorry, Lisa. If we did.
02:38:40 Speaker 34: get a proposal come in where
02:38:41 Speaker 34: you know somebody wanted to to
02:38:43 Speaker 34: uptake one of those surplus properties
02:38:44 Speaker 34: under the Municipal Act, you'd normally
02:38:45 Speaker 34: be dealing with kind of market
02:38:50 Speaker 34: rate or for those lands or
02:38:51 Speaker 34: an appraised value. Under a CIP,
02:38:52 Speaker 34: where you're looking at community-based objectives
02:38:53 Speaker 34: that you're trying to achieve, and
02:38:55 Speaker 34: you can place conditions and agreements
02:38:57 Speaker 34: around that, you may be able
02:38:58 Speaker 34: to transfer those lands at a
02:39:00 Speaker 34: low market rate. So as part
02:39:02 Speaker 34: of a portfolio, a Part of
02:39:05 Speaker 58: a portfolio of a partnership or
02:39:06 Speaker 58: or an agreement in that way.
02:39:09 Speaker 58: So I think those two tools
02:39:12 Speaker 58: work really well together, hand in
02:39:14 Speaker 58: hand. And as well, there are
02:39:15 Speaker 58: some provisions that allow for transfer
02:39:17 Speaker 58: between organisations as well. So, you
02:39:20 Speaker 58: know, if a local municipality, for
02:39:22 Speaker 58: example, was partnering with the county,
02:39:24 Speaker 58: you know, could we transfer those
02:39:24 Speaker 58: lands and deal with them at
02:39:26 Speaker 58: below market rate? We would both
02:39:28 Speaker 58: then have the ability to kind
02:39:31 Speaker 58: of play in that same sandbox.
02:39:33 Speaker 58: Whereas right now, the county is
02:39:35 Speaker 58: limited in that regard. whereas the
02:39:36 Speaker 58: CIP power sits with the local
02:39:39 Speaker 58: municipalities in dealing those lands that
02:39:40 Speaker 58: way. So, yes, and I think
02:39:41 Speaker 58: big opportunity to explore that even
02:39:43 Speaker 58: further. Thank you. Okay, anything else,
02:39:44 Speaker 30: Councillor Nielsen? Thank you very much,
02:39:46 Speaker 30: Ward Matrosov. I'm just trying to
02:39:49 Speaker 30: wrap my head around the DC
02:39:51 Speaker 30: combination. So, the report is suggesting
02:39:53 Speaker 30: that. if we incorporate the county
02:39:55 Speaker 30: CIP into the DC study, we
02:39:57 Speaker 30: can use DC study funds—sorry, DC
02:39:59 Speaker 30: funds—to fund the study to build
02:40:01 Speaker 30: and implement the CIP, but not
02:40:02 Speaker 30: actually fund the CIP once it's
02:40:03 Speaker 30: constructed. I guess I have two
02:40:05 Speaker 30: questions, kind of on how that
02:40:08 Speaker 30: might work. One is what the
02:40:11 Speaker 30: possible impact is into the DC
02:40:13 Speaker 30: charges itself, as in, like, how
02:40:14 Speaker 30: much are we thinking it's going
02:40:17 Speaker 30: to cost to build the study
02:40:19 Speaker 30: out, and two would be with
02:40:21 Speaker 30: I don't know if it's kind
02:40:24 Speaker 30: of died down, but there's still
02:40:26 Speaker 30: the provincial and federal comments around
02:40:29 Speaker 30: development charges and and just wondering
02:40:30 Speaker 30: if there's concern about we're trying
02:40:34 Speaker 30: to add extra studies into the
02:40:36 Speaker 30: development charges while at the same
02:40:39 Speaker 30: time the province and the feds
02:40:41 Speaker 30: are really trying to say you
02:40:43 Speaker 30: shouldn't have development charges or you
02:40:45 Speaker 30: should limit them. And I'm just
02:40:46 Speaker 30: trying to understand that correlation and
02:40:48 Speaker 30: just how this might work for
02:40:51 Speaker 30: the CIP. Where like I I
02:40:53 Speaker 30: fully support the concept of using
02:40:55 Speaker 30: the CIP. building it out, and
02:40:56 Speaker 30: funding it so we can support
02:40:57 Speaker 30: affordable housing, but it's kind of
02:41:00 Speaker 30: tricky to mean just how we're
02:41:03 Speaker 30: using that through development charges portion.
02:41:06 Speaker 30: Through you, and so I think
02:41:09 Speaker 30: I may bite off the first
02:41:10 Speaker 30: chunk of that, and then I
02:41:13 Speaker 30: might look back to Scott to
02:41:15 Speaker 30: take a bit on on that
02:41:18 Speaker 30: as well. So, in terms of
02:41:19 Speaker 30: impact to DC, so I think
02:41:21 Speaker 30: what we've identified within the report
02:41:23 Speaker 30: was you're marking about fifty thousand
02:41:25 Speaker 30: dollars for that kind of part
02:41:26 Speaker 30: C and D of of the
02:41:28 Speaker 30: work plan. it's a ballpark, right?
02:41:29 Speaker 30: We're we're trying to kind of
02:41:34 Speaker 30: get a good sense of of
02:41:36 Speaker 30: where we might land for a
02:41:39 Speaker 60: consultant to to engage with us.
02:41:42 Speaker 60: So, fifty thousand dollars is fifty
02:41:44 Speaker 60: thousand dollars, right? It may have
02:41:47 Speaker 60: an impact, but I just to
02:41:50 Speaker 48: give you a good idea of
02:41:53 Speaker 48: scale, and then I'll turn my
02:41:54 Speaker 48: mic off and and pass it
02:41:57 Speaker 48: over to Director Hill. Yeah, thanks,
02:42:01 Speaker 48: Liz, and and through Madam Warden
02:42:06 Speaker 48: to Councillor Nielsen. So we are
02:42:08 Speaker 48: working with Hemson right now on
02:42:11 Speaker 48: our development charges. Right now, on
02:42:14 Speaker 48: our development charge background study, and
02:42:17 Speaker 48: and because the county has never
02:42:20 Speaker 48: had the ability to do a
02:42:22 Speaker 48: CAP before, as Liz said,
02:42:25 Speaker 48: until Bill sixty, you know, one
02:42:27 Speaker 48: of the first questions early on
02:42:29 Speaker 48: was, is this something that that
02:42:31 Speaker 48: that we could charge DCs for?
02:42:33 Speaker 48: And what Hempson shared in that
02:42:35 Speaker 48: regard is, is a portion of
02:42:36 Speaker 48: it would be DC eligible. With
02:42:40 Speaker 48: any development charge, you need to
02:42:41 Speaker 48: look at what is the growth
02:42:44 Speaker 48: related aspect of that. So so
02:42:47 Speaker 48: it might not be the entire
02:42:49 Speaker 48: fifty thousand, but but we could
02:42:52 Speaker 48: we could work with Hempson to
02:42:56 Speaker 48: establish. Work with Hempton to establish
02:42:59 Speaker 48: that calculation. But when you're doing
02:43:01 Speaker 48: your development charges background study, simply
02:43:03 Speaker 48: put, it's it's not a wish
02:43:06 Speaker 48: list, and and it's definitely not
02:43:09 Speaker 48: a staff wish list. There has
02:43:10 Speaker 48: to be intent through previous master
02:43:12 Speaker 48: plans, or capital budgets, or capital
02:43:14 Speaker 48: plans in that regard that council
02:43:18 Speaker 48: has endorsed before we can even
02:43:20 Speaker 48: consider it in in the the
02:43:25 Speaker 48: background study. And that background study
02:43:27 Speaker 48: is is sort of the complex
02:43:29 Speaker 48: analysis you go through to to
02:43:31 Speaker 48: provide. in this case the future
02:43:33 Speaker 48: council the information of of what
02:43:34 Speaker 48: the county development charges would be
02:43:36 Speaker 48: starting in in you know later
02:43:39 Speaker 48: in twenty seven and and beyond
02:43:42 Speaker 48: kind of thing and council has
02:43:44 Speaker 48: the option of of adopting a
02:43:45 Speaker 48: bylaw with those charges or going
02:43:46 Speaker 48: with lesser charges so if council
02:43:48 Speaker 48: were to support this recommendation today
02:43:51 Speaker 48: essentially what it would allow staff
02:43:52 Speaker 48: to do is to go back
02:43:54 Speaker 48: to Hemson and said yes council
02:43:55 Speaker 48: is is interested in a development
02:43:57 Speaker 48: charges in a upper tier community
02:43:58 Speaker 48: improvement plan, we would include a
02:44:02 Speaker 48: portion of that cost of the
02:44:04 Speaker 48: fifty thousand in the background study,
02:44:06 Speaker 48: and and then that background study
02:44:11 Speaker 48: would ultimately come back to to
02:44:12 Speaker 48: council for for their approval. The
02:44:14 Speaker 48: project would have to be added
02:44:17 Speaker 48: in future years' capital budgets as
02:44:20 Speaker 48: well. So you know, although this
02:44:21 Speaker 48: is an early preview to council,
02:44:26 Speaker 48: this isn't sort of council committing
02:44:28 Speaker 48: a hundred percent. There still be
02:44:33 Speaker 48: that opportunity to reassess down the
02:44:36 Speaker 48: road. Sorry for the long winded
02:44:40 Speaker 48: answer. For the long-winded answer. Excellent,
02:44:42 Speaker 61: good teamwork. We'll go to Councillor
02:44:45 Speaker 61: Greg. I guess I just need
02:44:49 Speaker 61: a little bit more clarity, Liz,
02:44:51 Speaker 61: on where we're at. The report
02:44:52 Speaker 61: does state maintain, and there's an
02:44:54 Speaker 61: enhancement component in the same sentence.
02:44:58 Speaker 61: I just heard in the past
02:44:59 Speaker 61: the county was not in the
02:45:01 Speaker 61: position to do CIP programme, but
02:45:03 Speaker 61: the report clearly states maintain.
02:45:06 Speaker 61: So, have we been in there?
02:45:09 Speaker 61: I'm concerned with it's very simple,
02:45:11 Speaker 61: fifty thousand dollars. But as a
02:45:12 Speaker 61: project within the ten-year capital budget,
02:45:14 Speaker 61: what does this morph to? I
02:45:19 Speaker 61: find there is somewhat of a
02:45:20 Speaker 61: lack of clarity. It's a little
02:45:21 Speaker 61: bit dreamy. The aspirations, whereas engineering
02:45:22 Speaker 61: services could say, if you don't
02:45:24 Speaker 61: invest in that bridge. it's going
02:45:27 Speaker 61: to collapse. Or housing is if
02:45:30 Speaker 61: you don't fix that elevator, your
02:45:33 Speaker 61: senior residences are walking up four
02:45:34 Speaker 61: flights of stairs, and you don't
02:45:36 Speaker 61: want that. I'm not sure where
02:45:38 Speaker 61: this is going. And as
02:45:40 Speaker 61: long as we're delivering
02:45:42 Speaker 61: four, five, six, seven plus two,
02:45:43 Speaker 61: two point five percent in growth
02:45:45 Speaker 61: every year in tax increases, I
02:45:46 Speaker 61: heard you say it. Resources are
02:45:48 Speaker 61: limited, but if we're delivering. five,
02:45:50 Speaker 61: six, seven plus growth every year,
02:45:52 Speaker 61: we're not acknowledging that resources are
02:45:55 Speaker 61: limited for people. That's those are
02:45:58 Speaker 61: tax increases that are not sustainable,
02:46:00 Speaker 61: and that's where we've been at,
02:46:03 Speaker 61: and that's where we're currently projecting
02:46:06 Speaker 61: ourselves. So I'd like to hear
02:46:09 Speaker 61: more clarity, I guess, on what
02:46:11 Speaker 61: is the vision here, because I
02:46:13 Speaker 61: the report right now I'm concerned
02:46:15 Speaker 61: with we can't afford a. grandiose
02:46:17 Speaker 61: vision that's not coming through in
02:46:20 Speaker 61: in the pages here yet. I
02:46:23 Speaker 61: also we do. I think as
02:46:25 Speaker 61: lower tier municipalities where we have
02:46:28 Speaker 61: them, some of the CIP programmemes
02:46:30 Speaker 61: are very good. There's some great
02:46:32 Speaker 61: initiatives in there. Flip side of
02:46:34 Speaker 61: that is some of them almost
02:46:35 Speaker 61: are window dressing. Perhaps on Main
02:46:38 Speaker 61: Street, and then somebody can buy
02:46:39 Speaker 61: the building and they have a
02:46:43 Speaker 61: new vision and they rip out
02:46:45 Speaker 61: the taxpayer funded investment that just
02:46:47 Speaker 61: took place a couple years prior
02:46:48 Speaker 61: under new ownership. and it's not
02:46:50 Speaker 61: a lot different than some of
02:46:51 Speaker 61: the the reference that was in
02:46:53 Speaker 61: a report that we approved regarding
02:46:56 Speaker 61: a forest clearing portion of the
02:46:58 Speaker 61: land where it was funded by
02:47:01 Speaker 61: taxpayers in previous years, and we
02:47:03 Speaker 61: just approved wiping that out. That's
02:47:04 Speaker 61: a concern. How do we protect
02:47:06 Speaker 61: that? I feel like a lot
02:47:08 Speaker 61: of CIP is perhaps best delivered
02:47:11 Speaker 61: at the local municipal level, and
02:47:13 Speaker 61: I have a lot of trepidation.
02:47:17 Speaker 61: that we are walking into this
02:47:19 Speaker 61: at the at the county level.
02:47:21 Speaker 61: Thank you. There's a lot there.
02:47:24 Speaker 61: So maintain. I'll just I'll start
02:47:28 Speaker 61: there. So you know I think
02:47:30 Speaker 61: when the housing action plan was
02:47:31 Speaker 61: was first developed, we were aware
02:47:34 Speaker 61: that some uprisers had CIPs, but
02:47:37 Speaker 61: we knew that. it would be
02:47:39 Speaker 61: a process if we were interested
02:47:40 Speaker 61: to kind of have explore that
02:47:43 Speaker 61: tool for ourselves. So I think
02:47:46 Speaker 61: the the way that the Housing
02:47:47 Speaker 61: Action Plan addresses that is, you
02:47:49 Speaker 61: know, we talked about maintaining and
02:47:51 Speaker 61: and supporting that ongoing CIP programme,
02:47:54 Speaker 61: so administratively delivered at the county
02:47:58 Speaker 61: level, and actioned through the local
02:48:00 Speaker 61: CIP bylaws because that's the tools
02:48:04 Speaker 61: that we had available to us
02:48:06 Speaker 61: to deliver that portfolio. With Bill
02:48:07 Speaker 61: sixty, that changes. and now we
02:48:10 Speaker 61: do have the ability to have
02:48:12 Speaker 61: that tool. So, you know, I
02:48:13 Speaker 61: think there was general commentary in
02:48:15 Speaker 61: the Housing Action Plan around complementary
02:48:17 Speaker 61: incentives and trying to to offer
02:48:18 Speaker 61: support and and maintain that CIP
02:48:20 Speaker 61: programme. Um. So I have, you're
02:48:22 Speaker 61: right. I've taken some licence to
02:48:25 Speaker 61: say that we've talked about the
02:48:26 Speaker 61: CIP in the Housing Action Plan
02:48:29 Speaker 61: around maintaining incentives and delivering complementary
02:48:31 Speaker 61: incentives. I've made the log to
02:48:33 Speaker 61: jump to say that, and now
02:48:34 Speaker 61: that CIP tool is available at
02:48:35 Speaker 61: the county level, but that is.
02:48:37 Speaker 61: Available at the county level, but
02:48:39 Speaker 61: that it's under that portfolio. But
02:48:41 Speaker 61: when I brought the housing action
02:48:43 Speaker 61: plan update report last November, there
02:48:45 Speaker 61: had been some commentary in there
02:48:47 Speaker 61: around that there was a draft
02:48:49 Speaker 61: of that that legislation, and that
02:48:51 Speaker 61: we thought that that tool would
02:48:53 Speaker 61: become available. Excuse me. Initially sought
02:48:55 Speaker 61: some direction to explore that process
02:48:57 Speaker 61: to get the CIP. So, you
02:48:58 Speaker 61: know, I think all of that
02:49:00 Speaker 61: is natural evolution of of what.
02:49:03 Speaker 61: was identified in the CIP, and
02:49:05 Speaker 61: through subsequent discussions with council around
02:49:09 Speaker 61: pursuing that potential tool, but I
02:49:11 Speaker 61: think that you know you're right.
02:49:14 Speaker 61: Resourcing is limited, so you know
02:49:15 Speaker 61: the sky doesn't fall if we
02:49:16 Speaker 61: don't have a CIP, but I
02:49:19 Speaker 61: think it's about what it could
02:49:20 Speaker 61: be used for, and so I
02:49:22 Speaker 62: struggle to stand here and give
02:49:25 Speaker 62: you the whole vision because it
02:49:25 Speaker 62: is big. I have been working
02:49:27 Speaker 62: on reporting. around kind of bigger
02:49:29 Speaker 62: vision, but I guess what I
02:49:30 Speaker 62: would say is, you know, through
02:49:32 Speaker 62: the Housing Action Plan and all
02:49:35 Speaker 62: of the learning that we've been
02:49:37 Speaker 62: doing around capacity building for affordable
02:49:39 Speaker 62: housing and nonprofit developers, what we
02:49:41 Speaker 62: really heard back is that different
02:49:43 Speaker 62: developers do different types of housing,
02:49:45 Speaker 62: and they have access to different
02:49:48 Speaker 62: tools, and they have access to
02:49:50 Speaker 62: different financial tools. They're resourced very
02:49:53 Speaker 62: differently in terms of their capital
02:49:54 Speaker 62: readiness, and the market is—it's not
02:49:57 Speaker 62: market developers. It's not market developers
02:49:59 Speaker 62: that are creating the affordable, deeply
02:50:02 Speaker 62: affordable housing, and so you know
02:50:03 Speaker 62: I see this as an opportunity
02:50:04 Speaker 62: for us to be really noodling
02:50:07 Speaker 62: in on like exactly where are
02:50:09 Speaker 62: those barriers to our nonprofits at
02:50:11 Speaker 62: the scale that we have in
02:50:12 Speaker 62: our local area engaging around a
02:50:14 Speaker 62: surplus land offering or a project,
02:50:16 Speaker 62: even in partnership, to try and
02:50:18 Speaker 62: get an affordable component of the
02:50:20 Speaker 62: units in, because. different types of
02:50:22 Speaker 62: developers do different types of projects.
02:50:25 Speaker 62: So, you know, when you pull
02:50:28 Speaker 62: all that together, what we hear
02:50:30 Speaker 62: is that the barriers are early
02:50:31 Speaker 62: access to capital in the ideation
02:50:33 Speaker 62: and site preparation stages of development,
02:50:36 Speaker 62: and there aren't great seed funding
02:50:37 Speaker 62: grants available now. There, the the
02:50:40 Speaker 62: federal programme has changed significantly and
02:50:42 Speaker 62: is really available at the later
02:50:49 Speaker 62: stages of a fully cooked project,
02:50:52 Speaker 62: and so. you know, I think
02:50:55 Speaker 62: we're just trying to figure out
02:50:56 Speaker 48: that piece of how do we
02:50:58 Speaker 48: get those right tools at the
02:51:01 Speaker 48: right stage for the right players
02:51:03 Speaker 48: to make that happen. And it's
02:51:05 Speaker 48: in the weeds, and it's very
02:51:08 Speaker 48: neat. But I think if the
02:51:12 Speaker 48: market could create the affordable housing
02:51:14 Speaker 48: that we need without incentives, we
02:51:17 Speaker 48: would have it. So I really
02:51:19 Speaker 48: put this forward as as a
02:51:22 Speaker 48: tool that I think would be
02:51:25 Speaker 48: very helpful to us. But I
02:51:27 Speaker 48: think there are a number of
02:51:29 Speaker 48: stages ahead, right? Like I think
02:51:32 Speaker 48: we. would be reporting back to
02:51:34 Speaker 48: council on that A and B
02:51:37 Speaker 48: activities before we ever get to
02:51:40 Speaker 48: the consultant to do the sequencing.
02:51:42 Speaker 48: At that future stage, I think
02:51:44 Speaker 48: that we could develop a CIP
02:51:47 Speaker 48: programme and then decide budgetarily. We're
02:51:49 Speaker 48: not ready to implement it this
02:51:51 Speaker 48: year. We'll earmark the money for
02:51:52 Speaker 48: next year. So there, there will
02:51:58 Speaker 48: be lots of decision points. I
02:52:00 Speaker 48: think for those further targeting and
02:52:02 Speaker 48: resourcing discussions to happen. So I'll
02:52:05 Speaker 48: leave it there. But happy to
02:52:07 Speaker 34: to continue. Okay, and we'll go
02:52:08 Speaker 34: to Director Taylor for follow up.
02:52:09 Speaker 34: Thank you, Madam Moore, and I
02:52:11 Speaker 34: think just very briefly to build
02:52:13 Speaker 34: on what Liz said, any CIP,
02:52:16 Speaker 34: whether municipal or or upper tier,
02:52:19 Speaker 34: acts as as sort of a
02:52:21 Speaker 34: menu of incentives, and and any
02:52:23 Speaker 34: given council can choose you know
02:52:25 Speaker 34: which which items they want to
02:52:27 Speaker 34: put on the menu versus which
02:52:28 Speaker 34: are too extravagant and wouldn't fit
02:52:29 Speaker 34: the menu, and and so in
02:52:31 Speaker 34: this case, the county's menu we
02:52:33 Speaker 34: can offer is pretty much related
02:52:34 Speaker 34: to affordable housing, and and. so
02:52:36 Speaker 34: while as municipalities you all have
02:52:39 Speaker 34: broad menus and you can do
02:52:40 Speaker 34: things like brownfields or downtown you
02:52:42 Speaker 34: know facade improvements and everything else
02:52:43 Speaker 34: we would have to be very
02:52:45 Speaker 34: very targeted legislatively to to a
02:52:46 Speaker 34: lot of what Liz is describing
02:52:47 Speaker 34: with respect to to the housing
02:52:49 Speaker 34: and and so she's completely right
02:52:50 Speaker 34: you know this is somewhat aspirational
02:52:55 Speaker 34: because we were only given this
02:52:58 Speaker 34: legislative ability late last year we
02:53:04 Speaker 34: don't have a lot to go
02:53:05 Speaker 34: from just yet in terms of
02:53:06 Speaker 34: you know. there's not thirty other
02:53:08 Speaker 58: municipalities with an affordable housing CIP
02:53:10 Speaker 58: in in the province. So we
02:53:11 Speaker 58: we would need to do some
02:53:12 Speaker 58: further work. We would need to
02:53:13 Speaker 58: report back to council and and
02:53:15 Speaker 58: at some point need to further
02:53:18 Speaker 58: flesh out you know what what
02:53:19 Speaker 58: funding a CIP could look like.
02:53:21 Speaker 58: So this is very early stages,
02:53:23 Speaker 58: but certainly respect the the pressures
02:53:25 Speaker 58: that that both you as as
02:53:29 Speaker 58: county councillors and municipal councils are
02:53:31 Speaker 58: under with all the other things
02:53:32 Speaker 58: that are legislatively required. and as
02:53:34 Speaker 58: Liz said, this isn't legislatively required.
02:53:37 Speaker 58: We do think it could
02:53:40 Speaker 58: be a useful tool to to
02:53:43 Speaker 58: help laser in on on some
02:53:45 Speaker 58: of those housing incentives that might
02:53:48 Speaker 58: be useful. Well, thank you. And
02:53:51 Speaker 58: you mentioned some upper tier levels
02:53:52 Speaker 58: of government have some initiatives already
02:53:53 Speaker 58: in place. It might be I
02:53:55 Speaker 58: would enjoy seeing some examples in
02:54:01 Speaker 58: the report. So perhaps that's something
02:54:04 Speaker 58: that can be. emailed, to council.
02:54:05 Speaker 58: Just some references where we can
02:54:07 Speaker 48: access some of those resources, because
02:54:09 Speaker 48: certainly point two moves this forward.
02:54:11 Speaker 48: So when it becomes a budget
02:54:13 Speaker 48: discussion, the council of whomever is
02:54:15 Speaker 48: sitting there has a little bit
02:54:21 Speaker 48: more background to be able to
02:54:24 Speaker 48: see what types of initiatives have
02:54:25 Speaker 48: been in place and then evaluate
02:54:26 Speaker 48: on that, as opposed to here's
02:54:28 Speaker 48: your. budget. What do you think?
02:54:30 Speaker 48: Then your the the council is
02:54:32 Speaker 48: more informed. I guess I'll leave
02:54:36 Speaker 63: it there. I, it's good to
02:54:37 Speaker 63: support, but I don't think we
02:54:39 Speaker 63: want to get into the banking
02:54:41 Speaker 63: business. It's good to work with
02:54:47 Speaker 63: banking, but our role is not
02:54:49 Speaker 63: to get too deep within the
02:54:51 Speaker 63: banking industry. I think in terms
02:54:53 Speaker 21: of funding some endeavors, some. Okay.
02:54:55 Speaker 21: Thank you. We'll go to Councillor
02:54:58 Speaker 21: Nielsen. Thank you again, Ward Matrasoff,
02:55:00 Speaker 21: and I think Councillor Greg stirred
02:55:09 Speaker 21: some questions in my own mind.
02:55:11 Speaker 21: Currently, the county, as part of
02:55:12 Speaker 21: our budget, puts money into affordable
02:55:16 Speaker 21: housing every year, but we have
02:55:17 Speaker 21: rules and restrictions to how we
02:55:18 Speaker 21: can support nonprofits and groups and
03:38:32 Speaker 21: organisations with that. So, you know,
03:38:33 Speaker 21: hearing Councillor Greg's first question is
03:38:34 Speaker 03: really about what is that financial
03:38:36 Speaker 21: impact to a budget line later.
03:38:40 Speaker 21: The CIP might, moreover, just allow.
03:38:41 Speaker 21: us to have different rules that
03:38:43 Speaker 21: allow us to utilise the funding
03:38:45 Speaker 21: we're already putting away. We know
03:38:47 Speaker 21: that six hundred thousand dollars a
03:38:49 Speaker 21: year isn't going to buy us
03:38:52 Speaker 21: one unit in affordable housing for
03:38:56 Speaker 21: the county, but six hundred thousand
03:38:58 Speaker 21: dollars can help support the acquisition
03:39:00 Speaker 21: of land for a nonprofit that
03:39:04 Speaker 21: could then turn it around. And
03:39:07 Speaker 21: currently, the rules are we can't
03:39:10 Speaker 21: do that. But utilising a CIP,
03:39:12 Speaker 21: we might be able to find
03:39:16 Speaker 21: an avenue to which we can
03:39:20 Speaker 21: support a nonprofit utilising the funds
03:39:24 Speaker 21: we are currently have. There's a
03:39:26 Speaker 21: question. in there. Thank you very
03:39:29 Speaker 21: much. It went up at the
03:39:30 Speaker 21: end. Yes, so I think I
03:39:32 Speaker 21: think it does. It would it
03:39:34 Speaker 21: would allow us to act more
03:39:36 Speaker 21: nimbly, potentially with the dollars we
03:39:44 Speaker 21: have. And and I haven't had
03:39:47 Speaker 21: the conversation with Anne Marie in
03:39:48 Speaker 21: detail yet. And I did not
03:39:51 Speaker 64: want to speak to you know
03:39:54 Speaker 64: that levy fund and and seeking
03:39:55 Speaker 64: any claim to it. But I
03:39:56 Speaker 64: I do think you know we
03:39:57 Speaker 64: have those dollars. We're able to
03:39:59 Speaker 64: award them through partnership or flow
03:40:02 Speaker 64: through agreements. or a capital facilities
03:40:04 Speaker 64: bylaw, but a CIP is is
03:40:06 Speaker 64: a much more flexible tool to
03:40:07 Speaker 64: be able to do that. And
03:40:10 Speaker 64: particularly, we have been working through
03:40:12 Speaker 64: evaluation of a few of our
03:40:14 Speaker 64: county properties, considering potential housing use
03:40:18 Speaker 64: and surplus opportunities. So again, just
03:40:20 Speaker 64: for partnership facilitation as well, to
03:40:22 Speaker 64: be able to to be incenting
03:40:24 Speaker 64: or waiving certain things at the
03:40:26 Speaker 64: county level, which. we don't have
03:40:28 Speaker 64: the ability to do right now
03:40:30 Speaker 64: through those agreements, so yes, enabling.
03:40:32 Speaker 64: Thank you. Okay. Anything further, Councillor
03:40:34 Speaker 64: Gray? That just triggered a thought.
03:40:35 Speaker 64: Is there a mechanism here where,
03:40:37 Speaker 64: if somebody wants to construct a
03:40:38 Speaker 64: nine thousand square foot home, you
03:40:40 Speaker 64: could place like a CIP tax
03:40:42 Speaker 64: on it and then put it
03:40:45 Speaker 64: into a reserve for redistribution into
03:40:48 Speaker 64: affordable housing? I mean, I'd like
03:40:50 Speaker 64: for your heads. I see Scott
03:40:51 Speaker 64: was reaching for his button, there.
03:40:53 Speaker 64: So I don't know if you
03:40:56 Speaker 64: had a response in mind, but
03:40:58 Speaker 64: I'm not aware of that programme.
03:40:59 Speaker 64: But I'll pass along to Dr.
03:41:01 Speaker 64: Taylor. Okay. Yeah, ditto. I'm not
03:41:05 Speaker 64: aware of any legislative authority. It's
03:41:07 Speaker 64: something we could look into further
03:41:08 Speaker 64: with with legal services staff, but
03:41:10 Speaker 64: I'm not aware of anything there.
03:41:12 Speaker 64: Okay. Anything further? All right then,
03:41:17 Speaker 64: I'll call the question. All those
03:41:18 Speaker 64: in favour? And that motion is
03:41:20 Speaker 64: carried. Thank you very much, Planner
03:41:23 Speaker 64: Buckton. And we will be breaking
03:41:24 Speaker 64: for lunch now, and coming back
03:41:25 Speaker 65: at. Okay. Okay. So if I
03:41:27 Speaker 65: could call everybody back at 1:25,
03:41:32 Speaker 65: then we will carry on with
03:41:36 Speaker 65: the remainder of the item sevens,
03:41:39 Speaker 65: the two that were pulled from
03:41:41 Speaker 66: six, and then we. do have
03:41:43 Speaker 66: closed session as well. Thank you.
03:41:47 Speaker 66: Okay, thank you very much, everyone.
03:41:48 Speaker 66: We do have a quorum here
03:41:50 Speaker 66: around the table, and we are
03:41:53 Speaker 11: going to be continuing with Item
03:41:56 Speaker 11: 7G. And with that, once we
03:41:59 Speaker 11: get it moved on the floor,
03:42:06 Speaker 11: we will then look to our
03:42:08 Speaker 11: interim Director of Finance and Treasurer
03:42:11 Speaker 11: Murray to come and provide an
03:42:13 Speaker 11: introduction. So it's recommended that Report
03:42:14 Speaker 11: FRCW 1926 Healthcare Funding Requests 2027
03:42:16 Speaker 11: Budget be received, and that staff
03:42:24 Speaker 11: be directed to maintain the budget.
03:42:27 Speaker 11: Be directed to maintain the budgeted
03:42:31 Speaker 11: $200,000 transfer to the healthcare initiatives
03:42:33 Speaker 56: reserve for the 2027 budget and
03:42:35 Speaker 56: 2028 projected budgets, and that staff
03:42:36 Speaker 56: be directed to include the Sogin
03:42:38 Speaker 56: Hospice Inc. request of $175,000 to
03:42:41 Speaker 56: be included for consideration in the
03:42:42 Speaker 56: 2027 to 2031 budgets of $35,000
03:42:44 Speaker 67: per year to be funded from
03:42:46 Speaker 67: the healthcare funding reserve. So may
03:42:48 Speaker 67: ask for a mover and a
03:42:50 Speaker 67: seconder. Let it move by Councillor
03:42:53 Speaker 67: Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Dicker. It's
03:42:57 Speaker 67: now on the floor for discussion,
03:42:58 Speaker 67: and welcome, interim director of finance,
03:43:01 Speaker 67: Murray. Thank you, Andrew, the Warden.
03:43:02 Speaker 67: As you are aware, in 2022,
03:43:04 Speaker 67: the Gray County did pass a
03:43:05 Speaker 09: health and healthcare funding policy, and
03:43:06 Speaker 09: the details are a little bit
03:43:07 Speaker 09: in the report. I won't go
03:43:09 Speaker 09: into that in. my narrative right
03:43:11 Speaker 09: now. But so we do ask
03:43:13 Speaker 09: that if there are any organisations
03:43:14 Speaker 09: that would request a donation, that
03:43:16 Speaker 09: it must be submitted by June
03:43:20 Speaker 09: 30th to us. And we did
03:43:21 Speaker 09: receive one formal request in December
03:43:22 Speaker 09: of 2025. They did do a
03:43:24 Speaker 09: formal presentation, and they followed that
03:43:25 Speaker 09: up with a written request for
03:43:28 Speaker 09: 175,000 to be funded over three
03:43:29 Speaker 09: to five years. There was a
03:43:30 Speaker 09: request to help build a hospice
03:43:31 Speaker 09: in in Greg. In in Gray
03:43:32 Speaker 09: County, in part of Gray County,
03:43:38 Speaker 09: so I have I am recommending
03:43:44 Speaker 09: that we include that in our
03:43:45 Speaker 09: budget for discussion. I am recommending
03:43:52 Speaker 09: that it be funded over five
03:43:53 Speaker 09: years, which would be thirty five
03:44:01 Speaker 09: thousand per year, to be funded
03:44:05 Speaker 09: out of our current healthcare reserve.
03:44:09 Speaker 09: So there would be no levy
03:44:14 Speaker 27: request added to the levy in
03:44:15 Speaker 27: twenty twenty seven. Our current reserve
03:44:18 Speaker 27: balance at the end of twenty
03:44:22 Speaker 27: twenty six is projected to be
03:44:23 Speaker 27: just a little over two hundred
03:44:26 Speaker 27: twenty seven thousand, and at the
03:44:28 Speaker 27: end. of 2027, if we were
03:44:31 Speaker 27: to include the thirty-five thousand dollars
03:44:34 Speaker 27: on top of the two hundred
03:44:37 Speaker 27: thousand that Gray County has already
03:44:41 Speaker 27: committed to for the Wellness and
03:44:44 Speaker 27: Recovery Centre for the Gravurs Health
03:44:46 Speaker 27: Services, that would leave us with
03:44:50 Speaker 27: a balance at the end of
03:44:51 Speaker 27: a 2027 proposed draft budget of
03:44:53 Speaker 27: 192,144 dollars. And that's all I
03:44:57 Speaker 27: was going to say today. If
03:44:59 Speaker 27: anyone, so I will turn it
03:45:03 Speaker 27: over for any questions. Thank you
03:45:05 Speaker 27: very much, and I'll look to
03:45:10 Speaker 27: committee. The whole members, if they
03:45:12 Speaker 27: have any questions on that plan,
03:45:18 Speaker 27: Deputy Warden. Thank you, Madam Warden,
03:45:19 Speaker 27: and thank you, Sue. I I'm
03:45:22 Speaker 27: going to say that I'm going
03:45:25 Speaker 27: to oppose the motion, but at
03:45:27 Speaker 27: the same time support the need
03:45:27 Speaker 27: for this facility. How long? And
03:45:30 Speaker 27: I'll ask a rhetorical question: How
03:45:34 Speaker 27: long are we going to let?
03:45:38 Speaker 27: the province off the hook? Healthcare
03:45:39 Speaker 27: is a provincial responsibility. It is
03:45:42 Speaker 27: not the responsibility of the land
03:45:46 Speaker 27: taxpayer, property taxpayer. I guess that's
03:45:48 Speaker 27: the gist of my my my
03:45:51 Speaker 27: words. I I just can't support
03:45:53 Speaker 27: this. The province has for too
03:45:55 Speaker 27: long been let off the hook,
03:45:58 Speaker 27: and I'm not prepared to support
03:46:01 Speaker 27: this. Thank you. Other comments? Any
03:46:03 Speaker 27: follow-up from staff with regards to
03:46:08 Speaker 27: that? No. Oh, sorry. We'll go
03:46:11 Speaker 27: to Councillor McLean then. Thank you,
03:46:13 Speaker 27: Madam Warden. And just to be
03:46:15 Speaker 27: brief, I know that this policy
03:46:16 Speaker 09: was developed. I think you said
03:46:18 Speaker 09: 2022, and I know it talks
03:46:20 Speaker 09: about in the report that it
03:46:23 Speaker 09: must demonstrate that 20% of the
03:46:24 Speaker 09: house of those it serves must
03:46:25 Speaker 09: be great. Serves must be Gray
03:46:27 Speaker 09: County residents. I know there was
03:46:29 Speaker 09: a presentation from Southern Georgia Bay
03:46:30 Speaker 09: Hospital Group that is raising, you
03:46:32 Speaker 09: know, a million dollars for the
03:46:34 Speaker 09: Colliwick or the new Southern Georgia
03:46:36 Speaker 09: Bay Hospital, and I know that
03:46:37 Speaker 09: they got discouraged and they went
03:46:38 Speaker 09: away. But I think, in the
03:46:44 Speaker 09: sense, and this is just maybe
03:46:48 Speaker 09: for the next term of council,
03:46:49 Speaker 09: that maybe that policy needs to
03:46:52 Speaker 09: be reviewed because when it says
03:46:54 Speaker 09: 20% of its residents are to
03:46:59 Speaker 34: be served, that was I think
03:47:00 Speaker 34: I think originally went back to
03:47:01 Speaker 34: 2018 as when Back 2018 is
03:47:03 Speaker 34: when that first came forward. When
03:47:08 Speaker 34: you talk about residents and you
03:47:11 Speaker 34: talk about the Blue Mountains and
03:47:14 Speaker 34: the Blue Mountain Resorts, I think
03:47:16 Speaker 34: if you're a guest for one
03:47:18 Speaker 34: night, you're a resident. Anyway, I'm
03:47:22 Speaker 34: not going to get into that
03:47:24 Speaker 15: tonight or today, but I think
03:47:25 Speaker 15: there needs to be a review
03:47:27 Speaker 15: of that policy, and I'll leave
03:47:29 Speaker 15: it at that. Okay. Any other
03:47:31 Speaker 15: comments, Councillor Eccles? Thank you. I
03:47:33 Speaker 15: agree. with some of the things
03:47:35 Speaker 15: that Councillor Deputy Warden Millen states.
03:47:36 Speaker 15: This isn't one of the ones
03:47:41 Speaker 15: I agree with him on. Yes,
03:47:44 Speaker 15: we do need these facilities. It's
03:47:52 Speaker 15: not quite healthcare, but it's the
03:47:56 Speaker 15: end of life care. Quickly, Sue.
03:48:01 Speaker 15: I don't know whether you have
03:48:02 Speaker 15: the information. What did we, as
03:48:05 Speaker 68: Gray County, put into Chapman House?
03:48:06 Speaker 68: We've already been down this road,
03:48:08 Speaker 68: and I believe that the county
03:48:10 Speaker 68: had money in. I can see
03:48:12 Speaker 68: Councillor Patterson nodding. That I believe
03:48:14 Speaker 68: we did put something in there.
03:48:17 Speaker 68: But the other factor is in
03:48:20 Speaker 68: healthcare; it goes well beyond hospice
03:48:22 Speaker 68: care. how many of the municipalities,
03:48:24 Speaker 68: how many property tax dollars have
03:48:26 Speaker 69: gone into the new building, Markdale?
03:48:29 Speaker 69: And I know that Southgate put
03:48:32 Speaker 69: in over three hundred thousand into
03:48:34 Speaker 69: that one. Yeah, I agree with
03:48:38 Speaker 69: you, but it's where we're at
03:48:41 Speaker 69: with the province on delivering healthcare—not
03:48:43 Speaker 69: just the bricks and mortar. It's
03:48:46 Speaker 69: the continuous maintenance and upgrades and.
03:48:47 Speaker 69: equipment that we continue to put
03:48:50 Speaker 69: into healthcare. I'm wondering if we
03:48:54 Speaker 69: were doing the same thing. I
03:49:00 Speaker 69: guess maybe we'd have to ask,
03:49:04 Speaker 69: you know, the property tax payers
03:49:06 Speaker 69: to add in and pay more,
03:49:09 Speaker 69: or if we could get the
03:49:12 Speaker 69: province to start putting more fuel
03:49:18 Speaker 69: into our graders to, or get
03:49:20 Speaker 69: a few more zambonis that somebody
03:49:22 Speaker 69: would purchase. so we can keep
03:49:25 Speaker 69: running our arenas, but that's a
03:49:27 Speaker 69: different topic. I I will be
03:49:32 Speaker 69: supporting this for the fact that
03:49:34 Speaker 69: it's an initiative. It is for
03:49:38 Speaker 69: five years, and it's done. And
03:49:42 Speaker 69: it is our commitment to the
03:49:44 Speaker 69: health of our communities, and to
03:49:47 Speaker 69: the welfare of the citizens of
03:49:53 Speaker 69: our communities. So, I will be
03:49:56 Speaker 69: supporting the recommendations. It stays. Okay,
03:50:00 Speaker 69: thank you. Other comments, Councillor McQueen,
03:50:01 Speaker 69: and then Councillor Nielsen. Well, just
03:50:06 Speaker 69: following up on what the requirements
03:50:08 Speaker 69: are for healthcare. Just again, in
03:50:10 Speaker 69: the Southern Georgian Bay Hospital, they
03:50:12 Speaker 69: got to raise a hundred million
03:50:14 Speaker 69: for a billion-dollar hospital. So, but
03:50:16 Speaker 69: I do want to put a
03:50:18 Speaker 69: shout out for the Beaver Valley
03:50:20 Speaker 69: Ski Club. Just in June, they
03:50:23 Speaker 69: raised seventy-five thousand dollars for the
03:50:24 Speaker 69: for the Chapman House. So, a
03:50:29 Speaker 69: lot of funds are raised from
03:50:31 Speaker 69: local organisations that go back into
03:50:34 Speaker 69: those hospices. Those hospice, and I
03:50:36 Speaker 69: think that you know we all
03:50:38 Speaker 69: would agree that the end of
03:50:41 Speaker 69: life care is is so so
03:50:43 Speaker 69: important for sure. Councillor Nielsen. Thank
03:50:44 Speaker 69: you very much. Where much often
03:50:46 Speaker 69: forgive me, I'm just trying to
03:50:48 Speaker 69: remember the delegation and was the
03:50:50 Speaker 69: request from the hospice operational or
03:50:52 Speaker 69: capital funding? That I can I
03:50:54 Speaker 69: did confirm that the funds would
03:50:55 Speaker 69: go directly to the building of
03:50:57 Speaker 69: the of the hospice itself. Okay,
03:51:02 Speaker 69: and we'll look to the CAO.
03:51:06 Speaker 69: Just through Councillor Echo's question earlier,
03:51:12 Speaker 69: with respect to how much the
03:51:16 Speaker 26: county provided to the Chapman House,
03:51:22 Speaker 26: I did find some correspondence indicates
03:51:25 Speaker 26: that back in 2017 we provided
03:51:28 Speaker 70: a one-time capital grant of two
03:51:30 Speaker 70: hundred thousand dollars towards the construction,
03:51:32 Speaker 70: which again would be close to
03:51:34 Speaker 70: ten years ago in terms of
03:51:36 Speaker 70: towards that that particular project. So
03:51:40 Speaker 70: there could be more. funding that
03:51:41 Speaker 70: was provided, but that was definitely
03:51:45 Speaker 70: the amount that I could find
03:51:48 Speaker 70: in a short period of time.
03:51:50 Speaker 70: Thank you for that information.
03:51:52 Speaker 70: Okay, Councillor Gray. I would just
03:51:54 Speaker 70: like to state that I oppose
03:51:56 Speaker 70: the motion as is there because
03:51:58 Speaker 70: we have a. two hundred thousand
03:52:01 Speaker 70: dollar budget line item, does not
03:52:03 Speaker 70: mean it has to exist in
03:52:10 Speaker 70: continuity and that it's there to
03:52:13 Speaker 70: be drawn from. We have various
03:52:16 Speaker 70: investments in other healthcare initiatives, the
03:52:19 Speaker 70: Bayview Wellness, which is the two
03:52:21 Speaker 70: hundred thousand dollars, where you can
03:52:23 Speaker 70: easily demonstrate the impact in terms
03:52:26 Speaker 70: of reducing strain on some of
03:52:27 Speaker 70: the resources that the hospital may
03:52:30 Speaker 70: provide or that we provide through
03:52:32 Speaker 70: Kevin's team. In fact, just earlier,
03:52:35 Speaker 70: Kevin. spoke about hospital offloading. We
03:52:36 Speaker 70: have certain operational costs that we
03:52:40 Speaker 70: embed in our work here, which
03:52:42 Speaker 70: reduces strain in other in other
03:52:45 Speaker 70: systems that provide services for the
03:52:49 Speaker 70: public. But this is not one
03:52:51 Speaker 70: I can get behind. I firmly
03:52:53 Speaker 70: believe that the plaque on the
03:52:54 Speaker 70: wall is there to perhaps show
03:52:56 Speaker 70: Joe's excavating or. Murray's hauling whatever
03:53:00 Speaker 70: you know, a lawyer's office, a
03:53:07 Speaker 70: commercial interest that has something to
03:53:09 Speaker 70: gain with the exposure by investing
03:53:11 Speaker 70: and making that economic or that
03:53:14 Speaker 15: financial support. I'm totally on
03:53:17 Speaker 15: side with where we can and
03:53:19 Speaker 15: supported Chapman House, you know, and
03:53:20 Speaker 15: sound where we can reduce soft
03:53:23 Speaker 15: services, soft costs. at the times
03:53:26 Speaker 15: of construction, waived fees, certain municipal
03:53:29 Speaker 15: fees that can be waived, that
03:53:30 Speaker 15: are incremental, that are there, totally
03:53:32 Speaker 15: on, totally in support of supporting
03:53:34 Speaker 15: organisations such as this with initiatives
03:53:37 Speaker 15: like that. But in terms of
03:53:39 Speaker 15: just providing support financially, where the
03:53:42 Speaker 15: taxpayer can then see. that a
03:53:44 Speaker 15: level of government just donated their
03:53:46 Speaker 15: money is not something that I
03:53:48 Speaker 15: can get behind. I understand perhaps
03:53:50 Speaker 15: the the donation to Chapman House
03:53:53 Speaker 15: as well in the past, but
03:53:56 Speaker 15: again, I referred to it earlier
03:53:59 Speaker 15: today. Times may be different if
03:54:02 Speaker 15: we're looking at five, six, seven
03:54:04 Speaker 15: percent increases in our tax lines.
03:54:05 Speaker 15: This is a tax line that
03:54:08 Speaker 15: should see scrutiny when it comes
03:54:10 Speaker 15: budget time and when that. two
03:54:12 Speaker 15: hundred thousand dollar donate donation commitment
03:54:14 Speaker 15: ends, then this is an opportunity
03:54:16 Speaker 15: where that two hundred thousand dollar
03:54:19 Speaker 15: line item should be evaluated by
03:54:21 Speaker 15: the council of the day. So,
03:54:22 Speaker 15: I I'm not in favour of
03:54:25 Speaker 15: us committing because it is a
03:54:31 Speaker 15: commitment. It's only going into the
03:54:34 Speaker 15: budget, but it is showing commitment
03:54:37 Speaker 71: again to maintaining that two hundred
03:54:39 Speaker 71: thousand dollar line item, which
03:54:42 Speaker 71: I think in this case should
03:54:44 Speaker 16: have future scrutiny. by council in
03:54:48 Speaker 16: terms of whether it stays or
03:54:51 Speaker 16: whether it goes out of the
03:54:54 Speaker 16: budget in future years. Okay, thank
03:54:55 Speaker 16: you. Any further comments? Not seeing
03:54:58 Speaker 16: any other hands. Oh, sorry, Councillor
03:55:00 Speaker 16: Kennedy. Thank you, Madam Warden. I
03:55:02 Speaker 16: just think that we, Deputy Warden's.
03:55:04 Speaker 16: comments are certainly apropos, but I
03:55:08 Speaker 16: think that it's time that we
03:55:11 Speaker 16: get behind the movement to try
03:55:14 Speaker 16: and fix the problem with the
03:55:17 Speaker 16: province, and and that this should
03:55:18 Speaker 16: be the beginning of a of
03:55:29 Speaker 16: a move to try and change
03:55:30 Speaker 16: things, and to and it's going
03:55:35 Speaker 03: to take some work for municipalities
03:55:42 Speaker 03: to and maybe when you're at
03:55:45 Speaker 72: the AMO in the next little
03:55:56 Speaker 72: while. you'll have some discussions with
03:56:00 Speaker 72: the other municipal representatives around the
03:56:04 Speaker 72: province and see if we can't,
03:56:05 Speaker 73: you know, move the needle with
03:56:14 Speaker 73: the province on healthcare, which the
03:56:17 Speaker 73: health system is pretty close to
03:56:19 Speaker 03: broke. I think it's awfully difficult
03:56:22 Speaker 03: to, having supported hospitals and hospices
03:56:24 Speaker 21: to the degree that Grey County
03:56:27 Speaker 21: has for many, many years, I
03:56:28 Speaker 21: think just. an open break and
03:56:31 Speaker 21: say so sad, but we're done
03:56:33 Speaker 21: is just not the way to
03:56:34 Speaker 21: to move on it. And I
03:56:35 Speaker 21: think that there are better ways,
03:56:38 Speaker 21: and they will be take time
03:56:39 Speaker 21: and work, but that's what needs
03:56:41 Speaker 21: to be done. And that we,
03:56:43 Speaker 21: you know, I think council should
03:56:47 Speaker 21: examine every year what has contributed
03:56:50 Speaker 21: to some of these causes. But
03:56:52 Speaker 21: there's a long established tradition of.
03:56:55 Speaker 21: Gray County standing behind the most
03:56:57 Speaker 21: important needs of our communities, and
03:56:58 Speaker 21: that and we know there's a
03:57:00 Speaker 21: great need for this new hospice,
03:57:02 Speaker 21: and that we should continue to
03:57:03 Speaker 21: support it. Thank you. Thank you.
03:57:05 Speaker 21: Any other comments, CAO? Just further
03:57:07 Speaker 21: to through your warden, through to
03:57:10 Speaker 21: Councillor Gregg's comments with respect to
03:57:11 Speaker 21: in terms of the. incoming council's
03:57:13 Speaker 21: consideration, future budget considerations, the way
03:57:15 Speaker 21: the motion is currently worded is
03:57:16 Speaker 21: that staff be directed to include
03:57:19 Speaker 21: this request of 175,000 included for
03:57:20 Speaker 21: consideration in those respective budgets of
03:57:22 Speaker 69: 35,000 per year to be funded
03:57:24 Speaker 69: from the healthcare funding reserve. So
03:57:26 Speaker 69: there would be consideration, even if
03:57:28 Speaker 69: this motion were to be approved,
03:57:30 Speaker 69: there would be consideration for that
03:57:34 Speaker 69: to be, I guess, reconsidered or
03:57:37 Speaker 69: discussed further with respect to. when
03:57:40 Speaker 69: we go through the the budget
03:57:43 Speaker 69: process, as part of that, is
03:57:48 Speaker 69: at least my take in terms
03:57:51 Speaker 69: of the wording. And so, but
03:57:53 Speaker 69: as per the current policy, we
03:57:55 Speaker 69: received a request before the June
03:57:58 Speaker 69: thirty deadline. As as as interim
03:58:00 Speaker 69: director Murray noted, it meets the
03:58:05 Speaker 69: policy requirements as set out by
03:58:08 Speaker 69: the policy that was approved by
03:58:13 Speaker 69: council. I think interim director Murray's
03:58:14 Speaker 69: come up with a you know
03:58:15 Speaker 64: identified here's where. we're at with
03:58:17 Speaker 64: the with the current reserve amount,
03:58:17 Speaker 64: and here's how it could be
03:58:20 Speaker 64: funded. But recognizing that that could
03:58:22 Speaker 64: still be up for consideration as
03:58:24 Speaker 64: as part of the overall budget
03:58:26 Speaker 64: discussions is is my current take
03:58:27 Speaker 64: of of the wording of the
03:58:29 Speaker 64: motion. Okay, thank you, Councillor Dobrine.
03:58:33 Speaker 64: Thank you, and through you twofold,
03:58:37 Speaker 64: if you were asking us to
03:58:39 Speaker 64: commit one hundred seventy five thousand.
03:58:42 Speaker 64: Commit one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars
03:58:43 Speaker 64: one-time payment. I would have issue.
03:58:44 Speaker 64: I would have concern. We have
03:58:46 Speaker 64: committed other areas two hundred thousand
03:58:49 Speaker 64: dollars in its entirety, and this
03:58:53 Speaker 64: is over a five-year period. But
03:58:54 Speaker 64: this is still to be decided
03:58:57 Speaker 64: by the incoming council as to
03:59:01 Speaker 64: what's in, what's out. Are we
03:59:04 Speaker 64: continuing? Are we not continuing? So
03:59:05 Speaker 64: this is a more of a
03:59:06 Speaker 64: recommendation to. the new council as
03:59:09 Speaker 64: to what to consider. Could you
03:59:10 Speaker 64: just refresh my memory? The Soging
03:59:11 Speaker 64: Hospice was going to be located
03:59:13 Speaker 64: in Walkerton. Through you, Warren. Yes,
03:59:15 Speaker 64: that's that's our understanding is that
03:59:18 Speaker 64: it's to be built in in
03:59:19 Speaker 64: in Walkerton in the northeast corner
03:59:22 Speaker 64: of Walkerton. East corner of Walkerton,
03:59:23 Speaker 64: so therefore not located in Gray
03:59:24 Speaker 64: County, and northeast. Okay, thank you.
03:59:27 Speaker 64: I answered my question. Thank you.
03:59:30 Speaker 64: Okay, any other comments? Okay, then
03:59:31 Speaker 64: I will call the question. All
03:59:33 Speaker 64: those in favour. All the question.
03:59:34 Speaker 64: All those in favour. Okay, that
03:59:36 Speaker 64: motion is carried. Thank you. Okay,
03:59:37 Speaker 64: thank you very much, Treasurer Murray.
03:59:39 Speaker 64: And at this point in time,
03:59:42 Speaker 64: before we go to 7H, because
03:59:44 Speaker 64: it is tied to the closed
03:59:45 Speaker 64: session material, we will now return
03:59:46 Speaker 64: to items 6C and F, unless
03:59:48 Speaker 64: there's any objection to that. It
03:59:51 Speaker 64: would make more sense for the
03:59:52 Speaker 64: flow of what we. have to
03:59:54 Speaker 64: do this afternoon. Okay, seeing no
03:59:57 Speaker 64: objections, we will then go to
03:59:59 Speaker 64: item six C, the first item
04:00:02 Speaker 64: which was pulled. Oh, so I
04:00:04 Speaker 64: guess get ready, come on back,
04:00:05 Speaker 64: Madam Treasurer. It's recommended that report
04:00:08 Speaker 64: FRCW eighteen twenty six regarding the
04:00:09 Speaker 64: quarterly purchasing report for quarter two
04:00:10 Speaker 64: of twenty twenty six be received
04:00:12 Speaker 64: for information. May I ask for
04:00:14 Speaker 64: a mover and a seconder? I
04:00:17 Speaker 64: got it moved by Councillor Keaveny,
04:00:19 Speaker 64: seconded by Councillor Gregg. So. By
04:00:20 Speaker 64: Councillor Greg, so on the floor
04:00:21 Speaker 64: for discussion, Councillor Greg, you had
04:00:23 Speaker 64: asked to pull this to share
04:00:24 Speaker 64: a question. Please go ahead. I
04:00:25 Speaker 64: do, which might be better than
04:00:27 Speaker 64: having to go through all the
04:00:32 Speaker 64: line items in the quarterly purchasing
04:00:33 Speaker 64: purchasing report, which I thank you
04:00:36 Speaker 64: for presenting or preparing for us.
04:00:38 Speaker 64: My question, when I was reading
04:00:40 Speaker 15: it, there was a line item.
04:00:42 Speaker 15: It was seven one three Ninth
04:00:43 Speaker 15: Avenue East, and it was a
04:00:47 Speaker 15: roofing project. And in to my
04:00:50 Speaker 15: memory, I had no recollection of
04:00:52 Speaker 15: this ever being. Collection of this
04:00:54 Speaker 15: ever being in exposed during budget
04:00:56 Speaker 15: to council, and in reaching out
04:00:58 Speaker 15: to staff. Well, perhaps I'll let
04:01:01 Speaker 15: you present as to why that
04:01:04 Speaker 15: is. I think I wonder about
04:01:07 Speaker 15: strengthening our policy in the future
04:01:10 Speaker 15: so that an expenditure of that
04:01:13 Speaker 15: size, that's not on in the
04:01:15 Speaker 15: existing capital plan, is something that
04:01:17 Speaker 15: council's made aware of. before it
04:01:19 Speaker 15: just appears on a quarterly report.
04:01:20 Speaker 15: Yes, thank you for that question.
04:01:22 Speaker 15: This project, which Harrison has is
04:01:25 Speaker 15: you directed the question to him.
04:01:28 Speaker 15: He answered it, so I'm going
04:01:31 Speaker 15: to try to. He probably has
04:01:33 Speaker 15: more of the devil in the
04:01:37 Speaker 15: details, but I I truly feel
04:01:39 Speaker 15: reflecting upon it. Yep, I as
04:01:43 Speaker 15: we as finance did not do
04:01:46 Speaker 15: maybe the steps we probably should
04:01:49 Speaker 15: have done in the correct order.
04:01:51 Speaker 15: I think it was. some of
04:01:53 Speaker 15: it was some timing issues around
04:01:56 Speaker 15: grants being approved and not hitting
04:01:57 Speaker 15: reports the way we should have.
04:02:00 Speaker 15: So going forward, definitely this should
04:02:03 Speaker 15: have been brought a report to
04:02:04 Speaker 15: council should have been brought to
04:02:06 Speaker 15: you your attention on this capital
04:02:08 Speaker 15: project. There was in twenty twenty
04:02:11 Speaker 15: four twenty five was there was
04:02:13 Speaker 15: some co chief funds there was
04:02:17 Speaker 15: an investment plan presented. It was
04:02:18 Speaker 15: in. in there, and then in
04:02:20 Speaker 15: I think in the fall of
04:02:23 Speaker 15: twenty twenty five, there was a
04:02:25 Speaker 15: tender for that project build, and
04:02:27 Speaker 15: the and then the staff decided
04:02:29 Speaker 15: that they re tendered. There was
04:02:30 Speaker 15: two bids, and then they re
04:02:38 Speaker 15: tendered it back, and unfortunately, we
04:02:39 Speaker 15: missed picking it back up into
04:02:41 Speaker 15: that next budget cycle. So there
04:02:43 Speaker 15: were some missed pieces along the
04:02:44 Speaker 15: way, and I all knows as
04:02:47 Speaker 21: finance. So, but I what could
04:02:51 Speaker 21: I can tell to you going
04:02:53 Speaker 21: forward is that we will. do
04:02:55 Speaker 21: better. Going forward, we should have
04:02:57 Speaker 21: realized in when we did our
04:03:00 Speaker 21: capital project report earlier to you
04:03:04 Speaker 21: that we should have included it
04:03:06 Speaker 21: in there. But I think that
04:03:08 Speaker 21: too was also a timing difference
04:03:10 Speaker 21: because there were no expenditures. We
04:03:13 Speaker 21: didn't have a capital project identified
04:03:14 Speaker 21: to that project in our budget.
04:03:16 Speaker 21: Hadn't spent it, and it was
04:03:19 Speaker 21: right around the time we were
04:03:21 Speaker 21: doing the report, and it wasn't
04:03:25 Speaker 21: quite. It was purely a timing
04:03:27 Speaker 21: issue. Going forward, I did speak
04:03:29 Speaker 21: with our purchasing manager this morning.
04:03:32 Speaker 21: Going forward, we will ensure that
04:03:35 Speaker 21: when we are doing capital projects,
04:03:40 Speaker 21: we will also identify a capital
04:03:44 Speaker 21: project number so that we can
04:03:49 Speaker 21: identify it back into our budget
04:03:50 Speaker 21: book. And/or we also will, for
04:03:52 Speaker 21: our internal purposes, need to know
04:03:54 Speaker 21: because there will be capital expenditures
04:03:58 Speaker 21: that we need to apply to
04:03:59 Speaker 21: a capital project going forward for
04:04:01 Speaker 21: our reporting purposes. That's the the
04:04:02 Speaker 21: nice thing about our new budgeting
04:04:05 Speaker 21: software is it allows us to
04:04:07 Speaker 21: do that because there are projects
04:04:08 Speaker 21: sometimes where we do budget. Times
04:04:10 Speaker 21: where we do budget for stuff
04:04:11 Speaker 21: that doesn't actually have a capital
04:04:12 Speaker 21: project, and then we have to
04:04:15 Speaker 21: sort of create one behind the
04:04:17 Speaker 21: scenes because there's a future report.
04:04:19 Speaker 21: So, okay, thank you. We're also
04:04:23 Speaker 09: going to go to the CAO.
04:04:25 Speaker 09: Through you, Warden, and just further
04:04:27 Speaker 09: to interim director Murray's comments with
04:04:29 Speaker 09: respect to this, just to provide
04:04:31 Speaker 09: some context with respect to this
04:04:33 Speaker 09: project and how that project was
04:04:35 Speaker 09: funded. So, as as interim director
04:04:36 Speaker 09: indicated, that this this project was.
04:04:38 Speaker 09: not listed as a project a
04:04:40 Speaker 09: specific project in the capital budget.
04:04:43 Speaker 09: It's funded entirely from our our
04:04:44 Speaker 09: Cochi grant. So these are provincial
04:04:45 Speaker 09: funds that we receive on an
04:04:48 Speaker 09: annual basis, and and through that,
04:04:49 Speaker 09: what what has been the historical
04:04:50 Speaker 09: practice is that we develop what
04:04:52 Speaker 09: the housing department develops an investment
04:04:55 Speaker 09: plan, and that goes through in
04:04:57 Speaker 09: this case the community services committee
04:04:58 Speaker 09: to identify where we might be
04:05:00 Speaker 09: able to. look at some projects
04:05:02 Speaker 09: for allocations, there is funds that
04:05:04 Speaker 09: are set aside and allocated for
04:05:06 Speaker 09: unidentified capital projects. For five hundred
04:05:07 Speaker 09: thousand dollars, that's that was allocated
04:05:08 Speaker 09: with respect to that. That was
04:05:10 Speaker 09: initially earmarked for the Dundalk build
04:05:11 Speaker 09: project, and as as we you've
04:05:13 Speaker 09: heard through updates, that project has
04:05:14 Speaker 09: been delayed, and this this particular
04:05:16 Speaker 09: project popped up in terms of.
04:05:17 Speaker 09: needing to be done, and so
04:05:19 Speaker 09: in order to utilise and maximize
04:05:20 Speaker 09: the use of those funds, it
04:05:25 Speaker 09: was determined by staff at that
04:05:30 Speaker 09: that time to be able to
04:05:31 Speaker 09: proceed with that piece. As interim
04:05:32 Speaker 21: director Murray's indicated, I think there's
04:05:35 Speaker 21: is an opportunity to look at
04:05:37 Speaker 21: what that process looks like going
04:05:38 Speaker 21: forward, so that councils not seeing
04:05:46 Speaker 21: that project at this stage in
04:05:49 Speaker 21: terms of once it's already been
04:05:52 Speaker 21: tendered and and completed. And complete
04:05:54 Speaker 21: it, and so we're looking to
04:05:56 Speaker 21: see what how we can improve
04:05:58 Speaker 21: those processes on a go forward
04:06:01 Speaker 21: basis. So appreciate Councillor Greg raising
04:06:05 Speaker 21: raising that question, and we can
04:06:08 Speaker 21: we'll explore what those those process
04:06:11 Speaker 21: improvements look like going on a
04:06:15 Speaker 21: go forward basis. Okay, thank you,
04:06:18 Speaker 21: and don't see any further questions
04:06:23 Speaker 21: on this matter. So I'll I
04:06:24 Speaker 21: will call the question. All those
04:06:25 Speaker 21: in favour, and that motion is
04:06:27 Speaker 21: carried. Thank you. Next, we'll tidy
04:06:30 Speaker 21: up with section six at F.
04:06:32 Speaker 21: It's recommended that report TRCW twenty
04:06:33 Speaker 21: nine twenty six be received, and
04:06:35 Speaker 21: that a bylaw be brought forward
04:06:37 Speaker 21: for council's consideration to amend Schedule
04:06:38 Speaker 21: A of Bylaw forty nine forty
04:06:39 Speaker 21: five sixteen, being a being the
04:06:41 Speaker 21: bylaw to permit off road vehicles
04:06:44 Speaker 21: on certain roadways under the jurisdiction
04:06:51 Speaker 21: of the County of Grey by
04:06:52 Speaker 21: mending portions of Grey. By mending
04:06:55 Speaker 21: portions of Gray Road 10 and
04:06:56 Speaker 21: Gray Road 28, where off-road vehicles
04:06:58 Speaker 74: are not permitted, specifically Gray Road
04:07:01 Speaker 74: 10 from the south limit of
04:07:02 Speaker 74: Gray County to Natville Road, and
04:07:04 Speaker 74: Gray County Road 10 from Seventh
04:07:07 Speaker 74: Avenue in Hanover to the northern
04:07:08 Speaker 74: limit of Gray County, and Gray
04:07:10 Speaker 74: County Road 28 from the intersection
04:07:11 Speaker 74: of Concession Concession 2 NDR and
04:07:12 Speaker 74: Fifth Side Road NDR. to Bruce
04:07:14 Speaker 74: to Bruce Road, ten Seventh Avenue,
04:07:17 Speaker 74: Hanover. Okay, so may I ask
04:07:19 Speaker 74: for a mover and a seconder?
04:07:22 Speaker 74: Okay, we've got it moved by
04:07:25 Speaker 74: Councillor McQueen. Seconder, seconded by Councillor
04:07:27 Speaker 74: Pringle. So it's on the floor.
04:07:31 Speaker 74: I'm going to go to Councillor
04:07:34 Speaker 74: McQueen first, and then Director Hoy
04:07:35 Speaker 74: will stand in for staff response.
04:07:38 Speaker 74: So Councillor McQueen, you would
04:07:41 Speaker 74: pull this. Okay, thank you, Madam
04:07:42 Speaker 74: Warden, and I have no issue
04:07:44 Speaker 74: with the with the resolution. that's
04:07:46 Speaker 74: in front of us. I guess
04:07:48 Speaker 74: the bigger question is in today's
04:07:51 Speaker 74: day, and I know this has
04:07:53 Speaker 74: been a download from the province,
04:07:55 Speaker 74: fifteen twenty years ago about who
04:07:57 Speaker 74: is the jurisdiction over side by
04:08:01 Speaker 74: side ATVs and all that stuff,
04:08:03 Speaker 74: off road vehicles on our municipal
04:08:05 Speaker 74: roads. I know from Grey Highlands
04:08:07 Speaker 74: we we have a bylaw
04:08:09 Speaker 74: that it just it just lists
04:08:12 Speaker 74: the exemptions, not the roads that
04:08:16 Speaker 74: are allowed. I wonder if at
04:08:18 Speaker 74: some point in the new new
04:08:21 Speaker 74: setting of this horseshoe is this
04:08:21 Speaker 74: is to be reviewed because in
04:08:23 Speaker 74: today's day, I bet you a
04:08:28 Speaker 74: lot of people going down our
04:08:29 Speaker 74: roads roads in Gray County don't
04:08:31 Speaker 74: have a clue that they're not
04:08:33 Speaker 74: supposed to be on county roads,
04:08:35 Speaker 74: and you know the sales of
04:08:38 Speaker 74: side by sides and and is
04:08:40 Speaker 74: continuing to grow and grow and
04:08:43 Speaker 74: grow and and you know people
04:08:45 Speaker 74: are almost using it as a
04:08:49 Speaker 74: means of transportation. So I think
04:08:52 Speaker 74: at some point the bylaws should
04:08:54 Speaker 74: be reviewed and its and its
04:08:58 Speaker 74: entirety and and just see if
04:08:59 Speaker 74: there is maybe the other side
04:09:02 Speaker 74: of like strict, you know, maybe
04:09:05 Speaker 74: looking at restricting the ones where
04:09:07 Speaker 74: you don't want them versus having
04:09:08 Speaker 74: it across. Not opening up the
04:09:10 Speaker 74: conversation today. I just I think
04:09:13 Speaker 74: from today's day, probably most people
04:09:15 Speaker 74: using our roads have no clue,
04:09:18 Speaker 74: no clue that they're not supposed
04:09:20 Speaker 74: to be going down most county
04:09:22 Speaker 74: roads. Okay. Thank you. Any other
04:09:25 Speaker 74: comments? Okay. All right. Then looks
04:09:27 Speaker 74: like we're ready to call the
04:09:29 Speaker 74: vote. All those in favour? And
04:09:33 Speaker 74: that motion is carried. Thank you.
04:09:35 Speaker 74: Okay, that allows us to go
04:09:37 Speaker 74: then to item seven, seven H,
04:09:40 Speaker 74: and we have our county solicitor
04:09:43 Speaker 74: on standby. It's recommended that
04:09:46 Speaker 74: report LSRCW zero one twenty six
04:09:48 Speaker 74: regarding the updated land acquisition and
04:09:51 Speaker 74: disposition policy be received, and that
04:09:54 Speaker 74: the updated land acquisition and disposition
04:09:56 Speaker 74: policy be approved as presented, and
04:09:59 Speaker 74: that G. Gen 003 Sale and
04:10:01 Speaker 74: Acquisition Land Policy of Land Policy
04:10:03 Speaker 74: and G Gen 003001 Sale of
04:10:05 Speaker 74: Land Procedure and G Gen 003002
04:10:06 Speaker 74: Acquisition of Land Procedure be rescinded.
04:10:10 Speaker 74: Okay, so what we'll do is
04:10:12 Speaker 74: I'm going to call for a
04:10:14 Speaker 74: mover and a seconder to get
04:10:16 Speaker 74: this on the floor for any
04:10:18 Speaker 74: open introduction, and then as I
04:10:21 Speaker 74: mentioned, we will then proceed into
04:10:23 Speaker 74: close. We will then proceed into
04:10:24 Speaker 74: closed session before we vote
04:10:27 Speaker 74: on the open session matter.
04:10:29 Speaker 74: So, with that, may I ask
04:10:31 Speaker 74: for a move and second, moved
04:10:33 Speaker 74: by Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the
04:10:35 Speaker 74: Deputy Warden. It's now on the
04:10:36 Speaker 74: floor for open discussion. And welcome,
04:10:38 Speaker 74: County Solicitor Morrison. All right. Good
04:10:40 Speaker 74: afternoon, and thank you, Madam Warden,
04:10:43 Speaker 74: County Council. So, the purpose of
04:10:45 Speaker 74: this report is to present Council
04:10:48 Speaker 74: with an updated land acquisition and
04:10:50 Speaker 74: disposition policy for consideration. and I
04:10:52 Speaker 74: would like to start off by
04:10:55 Speaker 74: thanking Lacey Thompson, our law clerk
04:10:57 Speaker 74: and real estate coordinator. She is
04:11:00 Speaker 74: here with us today to help
04:11:02 Speaker 74: us get any questions. But her
04:11:05 Speaker 74: hard work and dedication is why
04:11:07 Speaker 74: this is in front of us
04:11:09 Speaker 74: today. So the Municipal Act requires
04:11:11 Speaker 74: that municipalities adopt and maintain a
04:11:12 Speaker 74: policy with respect to the sale
04:11:14 Speaker 74: and disposition of land. Our current
04:11:18 Speaker 74: sale and acquisition of land policy
04:11:20 Speaker 74: and the two related procedures are
04:11:23 Speaker 74: from 2012. They were amended in
04:11:25 Speaker 74: 2014, and staff have reviewed the
04:11:28 Speaker 74: current policy and procedures and are
04:11:30 Speaker 74: recommending an updated policy for council's
04:11:33 Speaker 74: consideration. There have been significant changes
04:11:36 Speaker 74: that have been made, but generally
04:11:39 Speaker 74: the process will remain the same.
04:11:41 Speaker 74: There are some key exceptions that
04:11:43 Speaker 74: we'll go over, but the policy
04:11:46 Speaker 74: is intended to ensure that the
04:11:48 Speaker 74: land transaction process is fair, open,
04:11:49 Speaker 74: and transparent, while protecting the county's
04:11:51 Speaker 74: interests. So I will do. a
04:11:54 Speaker 74: high-level overview of the proposed changes,
04:11:56 Speaker 74: but happy to answer any questions
04:11:58 Speaker 74: on specific changes if you have
04:12:01 Speaker 74: them. So there was a fairly
04:12:03 Speaker 74: significant overall administrative update, which transitions
04:12:06 Speaker 74: the policy to the county's current
04:12:07 Speaker 74: policy template. So this consolidates the
04:12:10 Speaker 74: three documents into one policy document.
04:12:12 Speaker 74: The intent of this change is
04:12:15 Speaker 74: just to bring it up to
04:12:18 Speaker 74: our current policy template. The policy
04:12:20 Speaker 74: statement. the purpose, and the scope
04:12:23 Speaker 74: have all been updated, but the
04:12:25 Speaker 74: intent remains the same. We have
04:12:27 Speaker 74: added a table of contents
04:12:29 Speaker 74: for ease of reference. Section one,
04:12:31 Speaker 74: definitions and interpretation, have been updated
04:12:35 Speaker 74: to reflect the new policy.
04:12:37 Speaker 74: We have a new legislated requirements
04:12:39 Speaker 74: section, which is in accordance with
04:12:43 Speaker 74: the policy template. We have an
04:12:46 Speaker 74: updated exception section. This is to
04:12:47 Speaker 74: add clarity. We have a new.
04:12:50 Speaker 74: financial matters section. This is to
04:12:51 Speaker 74: bring us in line again with
04:12:54 Speaker 74: that new current county policy template.
04:12:55 Speaker 74: We have an updated value for
04:13:01 Speaker 74: land section, and there is a
04:13:03 Speaker 74: key change to highlight in this
04:13:05 Speaker 74: section, which is the addition of
04:13:06 Speaker 21: the staff value estimate method for
04:13:10 Speaker 21: land that is under seventy-five thousand.
04:13:12 Speaker 21: I will note that this does
04:13:13 Speaker 21: not permit staff proceed without council
04:13:16 Speaker 21: approval unless an exemption is found
04:13:18 Speaker 21: elsewhere in the policy. Section Six,
04:13:20 Speaker 21: valuation not required, has been updated,
04:13:22 Speaker 09: but the intent remains the same.
04:13:23 Speaker 09: We have an updated procedure for
04:13:25 Speaker 09: acquisition of land. Section, the intent
04:13:26 Speaker 09: remains the same, but we have
04:13:28 Speaker 09: expanded this for clarity. We have
04:13:29 Speaker 09: a new methods of acquisition section.
04:13:31 Speaker 09: The previous procedure combined procedure methods
04:13:33 Speaker 09: into one section and contained additional
04:13:35 Speaker 09: sections for some specific methods. but
04:13:36 Speaker 09: we expanded it into its own
04:13:37 Speaker 09: new section and added additional methods
04:13:39 Speaker 09: for clarity. Section nine, we have
04:13:41 Speaker 09: updated for the procedure of disposition.
04:13:43 Speaker 09: Again, same with the acquisition; the
04:13:46 Speaker 09: intent remains the same, but we
04:13:50 Speaker 09: have expanded it for clarity. We
04:13:51 Speaker 09: have an updated notice section under
04:13:53 Speaker 09: section ten. There is a key
04:13:54 Speaker 09: change to note in this section,
04:13:55 Speaker 09: where we have removed the requirement
04:13:56 Speaker 09: for newspaper publication as part of
04:13:58 Speaker 09: the notice requirements. The general circulation
04:13:59 Speaker 09: of newspapers has decreased, and finding
04:14:01 Speaker 09: a newspaper in the relevant geographic
04:14:02 Speaker 09: areas has become increasingly challenging. The
04:14:03 Speaker 09: cost for advertising has also increased,
04:14:04 Speaker 09: so we still would have notice,
04:14:05 Speaker 09: and depending on the method of
04:14:07 Speaker 09: sale, there may be additional notice.
04:14:13 Speaker 09: So we did give the example
04:14:14 Speaker 09: of real estates and their advertising
04:14:16 Speaker 09: and MLS postings and that kind
04:14:19 Speaker 09: of thing. We have an updated
04:14:20 Speaker 09: Section 11 for methods of disposition.
04:14:23 Speaker 09: The intent was to expand and.
04:14:23 Speaker 74: clarify the various methods here, and
04:14:24 Speaker 74: we have given it the example
04:14:26 Speaker 74: of depending on the method, there
04:14:29 Speaker 74: may be exemptions. So auctions, public
04:14:31 Speaker 74: tenders under five hundred thousand, and
04:14:33 Speaker 74: requests for proposals all have exemptions
04:14:35 Speaker 74: in them. But also noting that
04:14:37 Speaker 74: council approval would be required, so
04:14:40 Speaker 74: we'd come to council, ask for
04:14:42 Speaker 74: approval to go by one of
04:14:44 Speaker 74: those methods, and that's when the
04:14:46 Speaker 74: exemptions would kick in. So, section
04:14:48 Speaker 74: 12, we have a new special
04:14:50 Speaker 74: acquisition and dispositions category. This was
04:14:52 Speaker 74: to highlight some special categories that
04:14:54 Speaker 74: didn't cleanly fit in the other
04:14:55 Speaker 74: headings. And then we have a
04:14:58 Speaker 74: new delegation of authority section, which
04:15:00 Speaker 74: the previous land acquisition procedure had
04:15:03 Speaker 74: a delegated authority section, whereas the
04:15:05 Speaker 74: sale procedure was largely silent. So,
04:15:06 Speaker 74: this is to add some clarity
04:15:11 Speaker 74: for both the sale and acquisition,
04:15:12 Speaker 74: and we have. an updated Schedule
04:15:15 Speaker 74: A. There is a key change
04:15:16 Speaker 74: to note here, which is that
04:15:18 Speaker 09: we are proposing to increase the
04:15:19 Speaker 09: compensation amounts in the acquisition for
04:15:21 Speaker 09: road purposes to better reflect the
04:15:23 Speaker 09: current market conditions. So, as you
04:15:25 Speaker 09: can imagine, land values have increased
04:15:25 Speaker 09: significantly since 2012. Staff has found
04:15:27 Speaker 09: that the values in the current
04:15:29 Speaker 09: policy make it difficult to reach
04:15:30 Speaker 09: negotiated agreements without obtaining an appraisal
04:15:33 Speaker 09: or seeking additional direction from council.
04:15:36 Speaker 09: which costs additional resources and causes
04:15:38 Speaker 09: delays. The updated schedule also includes
04:15:44 Speaker 09: the new method for staff valuations
04:15:47 Speaker 09: for land under seventy-five thousand. The
04:15:50 Speaker 75: intent is to support our colleagues
04:15:52 Speaker 75: in transportation services in negotiating agreements
04:15:54 Speaker 75: with landowners for acquisitions required for
04:15:56 Speaker 76: road purposes. The ability to secure
04:15:57 Speaker 76: property efficiently can significantly affect project
04:16:02 Speaker 76: timing, and so these additions are
04:16:05 Speaker 76: intended to support successful, efficient, and
04:16:06 Speaker 76: effective. negotiations, and and then so
04:16:08 Speaker 27: as Madam Warden noted, we do
04:16:10 Speaker 27: have a closed session component here,
04:16:15 Speaker 27: and where we have a new
04:16:16 Speaker 27: property negotiation guide, but we propose
04:16:18 Speaker 27: to discuss that in close to
04:16:19 Speaker 27: protect our negotiation power. Okay, thank
04:16:23 Speaker 74: you for that introduction to open.
04:16:24 Speaker 74: So just before we go into
04:16:31 Speaker 74: close to be able to discuss
04:16:33 Speaker 74: the the final pieces of this
04:16:35 Speaker 77: consideration prior to voting on this
04:16:37 Speaker 77: in open. On this and open,
04:16:42 Speaker 77: if you have an open session
04:16:44 Speaker 77: question, please go ahead, Councillor McQueen.
04:16:46 Speaker 77: Thank you, Madam Warden, and I
04:16:48 Speaker 77: know that I remember I remember
04:16:50 Speaker 77: the two thousand and twelve report,
04:16:53 Speaker 77: and I remember there was two
04:16:55 Speaker 77: different values per acre per land
04:16:58 Speaker 77: or whatever. One was for the
04:17:00 Speaker 77: Blue Mountains, and then it was
04:17:02 Speaker 77: the rest of the Mississauga or
04:17:04 Speaker 74: the county. Now we've seen a
04:17:06 Speaker 74: lot of values change. One is
04:17:10 Speaker 74: farmland, like at most places, thirty
04:17:11 Speaker 74: thousand acre in farmland. Where farmland
04:17:13 Speaker 74: back in two thousand and twelve
04:17:15 Speaker 74: was probably less than ten or
04:17:16 Speaker 74: or more. so that has changed
04:17:17 Speaker 74: something. And I don't know, getting
04:17:21 Speaker 74: into details if you have. So
04:17:23 Speaker 74: you you still use an appraiser.
04:17:24 Speaker 74: Because the land value served the
04:17:25 Speaker 74: county is probably different than 2012,
04:17:27 Speaker 74: and it's probably all over the
04:17:29 Speaker 74: place. So I know you try
04:17:32 Speaker 74: to come, and I know a
04:17:33 Speaker 74: lot of times it's the appraiser
04:17:35 Speaker 74: that tries to get you that
04:17:36 Speaker 74: value. But I know it's, and
04:17:37 Speaker 74: sometimes if it's a small piece,
04:17:39 Speaker 74: you take whatever it is per
04:17:40 Speaker 74: acre divided by square footage, and
04:17:46 Speaker 74: you try to come up with
04:17:50 Speaker 74: that number. If they have anything
04:17:52 Speaker 74: to add, then. Sure. Thank you
04:17:55 Speaker 74: for the question. So I I
04:17:58 Speaker 74: agree with you that it is
04:18:01 Speaker 69: difficult to narrow down a specific
04:18:02 Speaker 69: base price that applies across the
04:18:05 Speaker 69: county. We did try to do
04:18:07 Speaker 69: that, and that's part of the
04:18:12 Speaker 69: reason it took so long to
04:18:13 Speaker 69: get this report back is that
04:18:15 Speaker 69: we couldn't. So with Schedule A,
04:18:17 Speaker 69: it's for those smaller pieces for
04:18:21 Speaker 69: row purposes where we have set
04:18:23 Speaker 69: a compensation rate in there. But
04:18:26 Speaker 69: that's why we have also added
04:18:29 Speaker 69: the staff. So added the staff
04:18:30 Speaker 69: valuation method because we recognize, like
04:18:34 Speaker 69: our friends in Blue Mountains, their
04:18:37 Speaker 69: land values may differ. So the
04:18:41 Speaker 69: the base compensation rate that's included
04:18:43 Speaker 69: in Schedule A may not always
04:18:46 Speaker 69: be appropriate. So by adding that
04:18:47 Speaker 69: staff valuation method, it gives transportation
04:18:49 Speaker 74: a bit more freedom to be
04:18:53 Speaker 74: able to negotiate up to that
04:18:55 Speaker 74: seventy five thousand. But of course,
04:18:57 Speaker 74: if if we don't have the
04:18:58 Speaker 74: comparators, or if we decide that
04:19:01 Speaker 74: it's over the seventy five, then
04:19:03 Speaker 74: we would be looking at getting
04:19:04 Speaker 74: appraisers or looking at different value
04:19:05 Speaker 74: methods. Just an example, you could
04:19:14 Speaker 74: be road widening a section of
04:19:15 Speaker 74: of a county road that hasn't
04:19:17 Speaker 78: had the road widening, and you'll
04:19:19 Speaker 78: be going along all those farms.
04:19:21 Speaker 78: And if they're valued at thirty
04:19:23 Speaker 21: dollars an acre, you may have
04:19:24 Speaker 21: the it may be much different
04:19:25 Speaker 21: today than it would have been
04:19:28 Speaker 21: a long time ago, just because
04:19:30 Speaker 21: of those land values and the
04:19:32 Speaker 21: loss of land as well. If
04:19:34 Speaker 21: you're road widening, you're taking seventeen
04:19:36 Speaker 21: feet, going from sixty-six to hundred
04:19:38 Speaker 21: hundred feet, right? That adds up.
04:19:40 Speaker 21: So, yeah, thank you. Okay. Other
04:19:42 Speaker 21: questions, comments? Okay. We'll go to
04:19:45 Speaker 21: Councillor Eccles. Just quickly, you mentioned
04:19:47 Speaker 21: the seventy-five thousand, but in that
04:19:49 Speaker 21: seventy-five thousand, if it does go
04:19:51 Speaker 21: above the seventy-five thousand, you still
04:19:54 Speaker 21: don't need to go with that,
04:19:55 Speaker 21: unless there's another exemption someplace. I'm
04:19:57 Speaker 21: just kind of lost. Is it
04:20:00 Speaker 21: 75? That's the cutoff point, but it's not the cutoff point the way this reads right now. Am I interpreting that right? So the intention would be that if we're using the staff valuation method, we would only be using that if the land is under 75,000. If it's over 75, then we'd be looking at different valuation methods. So I'm misinterpreting that. because in here it says anything over seventy-five thousand it would be a different unless it qualifies for another for a different exemption. So you're telling me anything over no, got to go with the valuation. But the way this reads, it says no. If there's another exemption, then we can keep going the way we are over seventy-five. That's my that's where I want clarity. Thank you, and I think there's. a blanket if there's any exemptions that apply to the broad policy. So an example might be if it's a disposition or acquisition between municipalities, that kind of thing, where the value might be over, but there might be an exemption otherwise, where we don't actually need to get this property valued because it's between municipalities. So if there is an exemption where it's not needing to be valued, that kind of thing would be an exemption that would hit if it was potentially over seventy-five thousand. is so there is that broader exemption. If you can find an exemption in this policy, then might not need to get it valued. But if we're using the staff value method because we need a valuation, then we'd be using that for under seventy-five. Okay. Did I see Councillor Craig? My question was is really just ensuring that staff still have flexibility. Agricultural is easy to to utilise as an example. Utilises an example because it's most prevalent, but if you are working at sight lines on an intersection expansion, for instance, and there's a slightly treed lot or or scrub brush, the policy here allows the county to still dig in and be like, "Yeah, that has been scrub brush or treed for 50 years. You've never treated as ag land, which is more valuable," and then pumps. And pumps the price up. Do we still have that supreme discretion to be, or hazard lands, or some sort of more passive use than a higher value assessment, such as agriculture? Thank you for the question. And the intent is to still allow flexibility in specific examples. We'd be looking at each on a case-by-case basis. So if there are complicating things, I don't know that we. would be doing a staff value ourselves, and it might be one where we get an appraiser to get that type type of an opinion. But that would just be something that we look at on a case by case basis. Okay. Any other questions? Okay, I'm not seeing any further questions here. So let's look at the close going into close session, and then we will conclude with a vote on this matter. The vote on this matter. So it's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to section 239-2 of the Municipal Act 2001 as amended to discuss number one, labour relations or employee negotiations, and this is with regards to OPSU for Grey Gables and Lee Manor, and number two, a position plan procedure criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. with regards to land sale and acquisition negotiations. May I ask for a mover and a seconder? Moved by Councillor Patterson, seconded by Councillor Hutchison. We'll take all those in favour.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.