Grey County County Council Meeting Transcript — August 13, 2026

Hook: Rockwood Terrace Redevelopment Progress

Grey County · County Council · August 13, 2026

Summary

The County Council opened proceedings on August 13, 2026, reviewing previous committee minutes before turning to significant updates regarding local long-term care redevelopment and new by-laws. Officials debated repurposing an aging site while unanimously approving measures to facilitate infrastructure borrowing and wildlife management.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
County Council
Date
August 13, 2026
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

Council members Stephanie Patterson and Paul McQueen called to order the August 13, 2026 meeting.

00:08:02 Speaker 01: I would now like to call

00:08:03 Speaker 01: to order this Council meeting of

00:08:04 Speaker 02: August thirteenth. twenty twenty six. As

00:08:08 Speaker 02: you are able, please join us

00:08:09 Speaker 02: in the standing up for and

2 O Canada

Council members sang O Canada while conducting a roll call that confirmed attendance for all present members except Councillors Body, Bordignon, and Carlton.

00:08:11 Speaker 02: singing of "O Canada." O Canada,

00:08:30 Speaker 02: our home and native land. true

00:08:37 Speaker 03: patriot love in all of us

00:08:43 Speaker 04: command. With glowing hearts, we see

00:08:47 Speaker 04: thee rise, the true North, strong

00:08:50 Speaker 04: and free. From far and wide,

00:08:55 Speaker 04: O Canada, we stand on guard

00:08:59 Speaker 05: for thee, guard. God keep our

00:09:06 Speaker 05: land glorious and free, O Canada!

00:09:14 Speaker 05: We stand on guard for thee,

00:09:21 Speaker 05: O Canada! We stand on guard

00:09:26 Speaker 05: for thee. Thank you, Madam Clerk.

00:09:36 Speaker 05: Could you please conduct our roll

00:09:40 Speaker 05: call? Councillor Mackie. Councillor McKay.

00:09:44 Speaker 05: Councillor Carlton sends her regrets today.

00:09:46 Speaker 06: Councillor Pringle. Councillor McQueen. Councillor

00:09:51 Speaker 06: Nielsen. Councillor Patterson. Councillor

00:09:54 Speaker 06: Dicker. Councillor Kentner. Councillor Keaveny.

00:09:58 Speaker 06: Councillor Body sends his regrets. today.

00:10:00 Speaker 06: Alternate Councillor Kepky, Councillor Greg,

00:10:05 Speaker 06: Councillor Milne, Councillor Debrine, Warden

00:10:09 Speaker 06: Matrasovs, Councillor Bordignon also sends his

00:10:12 Speaker 06: regrets today. Councillor Eccles, Councillor Hutchinson.

00:10:17 Speaker 06: So we have all members in

00:10:18 Speaker 06: attendance today, with the exception of

00:10:19 Speaker 06: Councillors Body, Bordignon, and Carlton. Thank

4 Land Acknowledgement

Council members Scott Mackey and Paul McQueen respectfully acknowledge gathering on the traditional territory of the Anishinabek Nation and the Six Nations of the Grand River Haudenosaunee, expressing dedication to honouring Indigenous history while proceeding to adopt the minutes.

00:10:26 Speaker 06: you. Let us begin by respectfully.

00:10:29 Speaker 06: acknowledging that we are gathering on

00:10:30 Speaker 02: the traditional territory of the Anishinabek

00:10:34 Speaker 02: Nation, the people known as the

00:10:35 Speaker 02: Three Fires, as the Ojibwe, Odawa,

00:10:38 Speaker 02: and Potawatomi nations, and further, we

00:10:42 Speaker 02: give thanks to the Chippewas of

00:10:44 Speaker 02: Saugeen and the Chippewas of Nawash,

00:10:46 Speaker 02: known collectively as the Saugeen Ojibwe

00:10:49 Speaker 02: Nation, the traditional keepers of these

00:10:52 Speaker 02: lands and waters since time immemorial.

00:10:55 Speaker 02: In our south lies the traditional

00:10:58 Speaker 02: territories of the Six Nations of

00:10:59 Speaker 02: the Grand River Haudenosaunee. We are

00:11:03 Speaker 02: dedicated to honouring Indigenous history and

00:11:06 Speaker 02: culture, and committed to moving forward

00:11:09 Speaker 02: in the spirit of truth, reconciliation,

00:11:13 Speaker 02: friendship, and collabouration with all First

00:11:16 Speaker 02: Nations, Métis, and Inuit people. At

00:11:24 Speaker 02: this time in our council. agenda,

00:11:26 Speaker 02: we will look at the adoption

5.a County Council and Committee of the Whole minutes dated July 23, 2026

Council adopted minutes from the July 23, 2026 meeting as presented.

00:11:27 Speaker 02: of the minutes. Item five a:

00:11:29 Speaker 02: It's recommended that the minutes of

00:11:30 Speaker 02: the county council meeting and the

00:11:32 Speaker 02: committee, the whole meeting dated July

00:11:34 Speaker 02: twenty third, twenty twenty six, and

00:11:36 Speaker 02: the resolutions contained therein be adopted

00:11:39 Speaker 02: as presented. May ask for a

00:11:40 Speaker 02: mover and a seconder. Moved by

00:11:42 Speaker 02: Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Nielsen.

00:11:44 Speaker 02: It's on the floor for any

00:11:47 Speaker 02: discussion. All those in favour? And

5.b Closed Committee of the Whole meeting minutes dated July 23, 2026 and Long Term Care Committee of Management minutes dated July 16, 2026

Council adopted the closed session committee of the whole and long term care committee of management minutes from July 23 and July 16, 2026.

00:11:49 Speaker 02: that motion is carried. Item five

00:11:53 Speaker 02: b: Is recommended that the closed

00:11:55 Speaker 02: session committee of the whole meeting

00:11:56 Speaker 02: minutes dated July twenty third, twenty

00:11:58 Speaker 02: twenty six, and the closed session

00:12:00 Speaker 02: long term care committee of management

00:12:03 Speaker 02: meeting minutes dated July sixteenth, twenty

00:12:07 Speaker 02: twenty six, be adopted as provided.

00:12:08 Speaker 02: May I ask for a mover

00:12:10 Speaker 02: and a seconder? Moved by Councillor

00:12:12 Speaker 02: Kieveny, seconded by Councillor Dobrine. Any

00:12:15 Speaker 02: discussion? All those in favour? That

5.c Long Term Care Committee of Management minutes dated July 16, 2026

The Long Term Care Committee reviewed operational reports and evaluated scenarios for repurposing an aging site through leasing, sale, or redevelopment into senior housing. Council debated funding a $30,000 study to assess renovating Rockwood Terrace for alternative standard beds while approving additional resources to investigate new renovation funding opportunities.

00:12:22 Speaker 02: motion is carried. Okay. and next

00:12:24 Speaker 02: we'll look at item five C,

00:12:27 Speaker 02: and there are a number of

00:12:28 Speaker 02: items that have been duly published

00:12:30 Speaker 02: and circulated in the agenda. So

00:12:32 Speaker 02: it is recommended that the Long

00:12:33 Speaker 02: Term Care Committee of Management meeting

00:12:37 Speaker 02: minutes dated July sixteenth, twenty twenty

00:12:39 Speaker 02: six, be adopted as presented, and

00:12:41 Speaker 02: that the following resolutions contained therein

00:12:45 Speaker 02: be endorsed. And within it is

00:12:49 Speaker 02: the report LTCCRCM sixteen twenty six

00:12:51 Speaker 02: to be. 26 to be received

00:12:53 Speaker 02: with the following bullet points that

00:12:58 Speaker 02: have been circulated, and that the

00:13:02 Speaker 02: LTCRC LTCRCM 1226 regarding a long

00:13:05 Speaker 02: term care director update be provided

00:13:08 Speaker 02: for received for information that the

00:13:12 Speaker 02: report LTCRCM 1326 regarding the long

00:13:15 Speaker 02: term care operational report dated April

00:13:19 Speaker 02: 15th to June 14th 2026 be

00:13:22 Speaker 02: received, and that the report LTCRCM

00:13:24 Speaker 02: fourteen twenty six regarding Gray Gables

00:13:26 Speaker 02: fire panel and system replacement be

00:13:27 Speaker 02: received, and that the staff be

00:13:29 Speaker 02: directed to proceed with a single

00:13:32 Speaker 02: source purchase with Troy Life and

00:13:34 Speaker 02: Fire Safety Limited for the fire

00:13:36 Speaker 02: panel and system replacement in the

00:13:37 Speaker 02: amount of one hundred and twenty

00:13:39 Speaker 02: two thousand one hundred and seventy

00:13:41 Speaker 02: three dollars and twenty four cents,

00:13:43 Speaker 02: which excludes HST, in accordance with

00:13:45 Speaker 02: section four point seven of the

00:13:48 Speaker 02: purchasing policy and bylaw five two

00:13:50 Speaker 02: zero nine. twenty four, and finally

00:13:53 Speaker 02: there was a report LTCRCM fifteen

00:13:56 Speaker 02: twenty six regarding Lee Manor Building

00:13:59 Speaker 02: Automation System Replacement that it be

00:14:02 Speaker 02: received and that it is noted

00:14:05 Speaker 02: that the Building Automation Replacement be

00:14:06 Speaker 02: awarded to Empire Controls at a

00:14:08 Speaker 02: cost of two hundred and forty

00:14:10 Speaker 02: five thousand three hundred thirty seven

00:14:12 Speaker 02: dollars and seventy one cents excluding

00:14:15 Speaker 02: HST, and that the shortfall be

00:14:18 Speaker 02: funded by reallocating the approved. 2026

00:14:21 Speaker 02: capital budget of 109,700 for hot

00:14:23 Speaker 02: water recirculating system to this project,

00:14:24 Speaker 02: may I ask for a mover

00:14:27 Speaker 02: and a seconder, please? Before I

00:14:28 Speaker 02: look to staff to come and

00:14:30 Speaker 02: make a few comments, move by

00:14:32 Speaker 02: Councillor Gray, second by Councillor Dicker.

00:14:36 Speaker 02: It's now. Oh, sorry, Councillor Gray,

00:14:40 Speaker 02: you're not moving. I would like

00:14:44 Speaker 07: to vote on the first report,

00:14:46 Speaker 07: CM 1626. Twenty-six separately than the

00:14:50 Speaker 07: rest of the minutes, Madam Warden.

00:14:52 Speaker 08: Okay, so Councillor Greg, are you

00:14:55 Speaker 08: moving, but then asking that it

00:14:58 Speaker 08: be split? Okay, so just just

00:15:00 Speaker 08: before I return to Councillor Dicker,

00:15:11 Speaker 08: Madam Clerk, there's a request to

00:15:13 Speaker 08: split. Okay. Okay. So what we

00:15:14 Speaker 08: can do since we haven't actually.

00:15:15 Speaker 08: officially had it on the floor,

00:15:17 Speaker 08: since there was not yet a

00:15:19 Speaker 08: mover with a seconder, we can

00:15:21 Speaker 08: actually look at that first report.

00:15:23 Speaker 08: Second, we can actually separate it

00:15:25 Speaker 08: without having to move to call

00:15:28 Speaker 08: for a separation. So, on this

00:15:32 Speaker 08: first one, then the oh, sorry,

00:15:33 Speaker 08: Councillor McQueen. Sorry, point of order.

00:15:34 Speaker 08: That wasn't the case last meeting

00:15:37 Speaker 08: when I wanted a separate bylaw

00:15:38 Speaker 08: pulled. I had we had to

00:15:41 Speaker 09: have a separate motion to pull

00:15:43 Speaker 09: that separate bylaw, separate the. question,

00:15:44 Speaker 09: so I don't know why we're

00:15:51 Speaker 09: doing it different today than was

00:15:53 Speaker 09: different then. So the clerk has

00:15:54 Speaker 09: confirmed that in that particular case,

00:15:55 Speaker 09: it was already on the floor

00:15:58 Speaker 09: and therefore needed to be split.

00:16:00 Speaker 09: So it's just a procedural chicken

00:16:01 Speaker 02: or egg before. So we can

00:16:02 Speaker 02: do it both way. We can

00:16:05 Speaker 02: have the result in the end.

00:16:07 Speaker 02: People can ask to can move

00:16:08 Speaker 02: simply a portion at the beginning,

00:16:10 Speaker 02: or they can ask to split.

00:16:13 Speaker 02: That still achieves. But still achieves

00:16:15 Speaker 02: the same accomplishment. So, because I

00:16:17 Speaker 02: did not actually have Councillor Greg

00:16:19 Speaker 02: did not move it. Councillor Dickerd

00:16:20 Speaker 02: had raised his hand to second.

00:16:22 Speaker 02: So, Councillor Dickerd, would you be

00:16:24 Speaker 02: willing to move the first part

00:16:25 Speaker 02: of this? Okay. He has confirmed

00:16:28 Speaker 02: that he has. So, I would

00:16:29 Speaker 02: then need a seconder for this

00:16:32 Speaker 02: report, and I've got that from

00:16:34 Speaker 02: Councillor Mackie. Thank you. So now

00:16:37 Speaker 02: this report is on the floor

00:16:40 Speaker 02: for discussion. Director Cornell and Deputy

00:16:42 Speaker 02: CAO, if you would like to.

00:16:45 Speaker 02: come to the lectern and focus

00:16:51 Speaker 02: in on just the topic at

00:16:53 Speaker 02: hand before we continue to the

00:16:56 Speaker 02: rest. Good morning, Madam Warden, members

00:16:57 Speaker 02: of Council. So Jen and I

00:17:00 Speaker 02: have split up. Director Corneil and

00:17:01 Speaker 10: I split up the balance of

00:17:03 Speaker 10: the the notes from the long

00:17:05 Speaker 10: term care committee of management meeting,

00:17:07 Speaker 10: and and I drew the the

00:17:08 Speaker 10: short straw and got this report.

00:17:10 Speaker 10: So quite happy to provide some.

00:17:12 Speaker 10: opening comments and then try and

00:17:14 Speaker 10: answer any questions that may come

00:17:17 Speaker 10: forward from this. So, as part

00:17:19 Speaker 10: of the budget process earlier this

00:17:23 Speaker 10: year, council confirmed the allocation of

00:17:26 Speaker 10: some funding to go towards an

00:17:28 Speaker 10: investigation of potential future options for

00:17:31 Speaker 10: the Rockwood Terrace site and for

00:17:34 Speaker 10: the Grey Gables site. And as

00:17:36 Speaker 10: as council will recall, in late

00:17:38 Speaker 10: 2025, we received some some survey

00:17:40 Speaker 10: requests. from the Ministry of Long

00:17:42 Speaker 10: Term Care in regards to both

00:17:45 Speaker 10: properties and the allocations of potential

00:17:48 Speaker 10: capital funding towards future long term

00:17:50 Speaker 10: care beds at both sites in

00:17:53 Speaker 10: various different ways. We are also,

00:17:55 Speaker 10: obviously, in the process of far

00:17:57 Speaker 10: down the process of constructing the

00:17:59 Speaker 10: new Rockwood Terrace, which will leave

00:18:01 Speaker 10: us with the old Rockwood Terrace

00:18:02 Speaker 10: facility that we have to have

00:18:05 Speaker 10: some idea and conversation around what

00:18:09 Speaker 10: to do with. And so, based.

00:18:11 Speaker 10: on the direction through budget, staff

00:18:13 Speaker 10: have engaged Colliers, who have been

00:18:15 Speaker 10: working with us on Rockwood Terrace,

00:18:16 Speaker 10: and through Colliers, a team of

00:18:19 Speaker 10: professionals to look at both buildings

00:18:21 Speaker 10: and a full options assessment for

00:18:23 Speaker 10: both Gray Gables site and for

00:18:25 Speaker 10: the Rockwood Terrace site, the existing

00:18:26 Speaker 10: Rockwood Terrace site. And so, at

00:18:28 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management,

00:18:29 Speaker 10: we provided a bit of an

00:18:30 Speaker 10: update on that work. The report

00:18:33 Speaker 10: is not finalised at this point;

00:18:34 Speaker 10: it was a draft report. The

00:18:35 Speaker 10: draft report, when finalised, will be

00:18:38 Speaker 10: coming. Well, once it's finished, it

00:18:40 Speaker 10: will come back to committee as

00:18:42 Speaker 10: a whole for conversation. The update

00:18:43 Speaker 10: included the scenarios that we've we've

00:18:45 Speaker 10: worked through, some of the options

00:18:48 Speaker 10: that exist when each one of

00:18:49 Speaker 10: those scenarios. So at Rockwood Terrace,

00:18:51 Speaker 10: the scenarios go from leasing the

00:18:54 Speaker 10: building as is to sale of

00:18:57 Speaker 10: the building and site, through to

00:18:59 Speaker 10: the redevelopment of that building into

00:19:01 Speaker 10: a number of different potential future

00:19:02 Speaker 10: uses, including long term care facilities

00:19:04 Speaker 10: of a class A standard. so

00:19:05 Speaker 10: very similar to the standard of

00:19:07 Speaker 10: the facilities that we have at

00:19:09 Speaker 10: our other homes, and indeed a

00:19:13 Speaker 10: building at the new Rockwood Terrace,

00:19:15 Speaker 10: through to looking at options for

00:19:17 Speaker 10: assisted living, affordable living, and seniors'

00:19:18 Speaker 10: community, and a blended option within

00:19:21 Speaker 10: that as well. So, a full

00:19:24 Speaker 10: range of scenarios for the existing

00:19:26 Speaker 10: Rockwood Terrace building were considered, and

00:19:28 Speaker 10: some some Class D estimates provided

00:19:28 Speaker 10: around what they might they might

00:19:30 Speaker 10: look like if we were to

00:19:32 Speaker 10: move forward with any of those

00:19:34 Speaker 10: at some. point in the future,

00:19:36 Speaker 10: and then in regards to the

00:19:39 Speaker 10: Grey Gables site, council will recall

00:19:42 Speaker 10: that we do have an allocation

00:19:45 Speaker 10: of capital funding allocated to Grey

00:19:48 Speaker 10: Gables. It's quite specific to building

00:19:49 Speaker 10: a new 128-bed facility on that

00:19:52 Speaker 10: site, and so we wanted to

00:19:55 Speaker 10: look at other options that were

00:19:56 Speaker 10: potentially available at Grey Gables, aligned

00:19:58 Speaker 10: with new ministry funding programmemes, to

00:19:59 Speaker 10: inform whether or not we asked

00:20:01 Speaker 10: to retain those 62-bed. Retain those

00:20:03 Speaker 10: 62 beds, pass them back to

00:20:04 Speaker 10: the province, or look for some

00:20:07 Speaker 10: other option. And so, based on

00:20:08 Speaker 10: some of the work that the

00:20:10 Speaker 10: Colliers team talked through through Long

00:20:12 Speaker 10: Term Care Committee of Management, we

00:20:15 Speaker 10: looked at a new build on

00:20:18 Speaker 10: the site as well as the

00:20:20 Speaker 10: existing building, and what various different

00:20:22 Speaker 10: additions to Grey Gables could look

00:20:25 Speaker 10: like to use that capital allocation.

00:20:29 Speaker 10: And again, some high level numbers

00:20:31 Speaker 10: were provided on that. Committee, Long

00:20:33 Speaker 10: Term Care Committee of Management, also.

00:20:35 Speaker 10: discussed requests to extend some funding

00:20:37 Speaker 10: associated to this work, and so

00:20:39 Speaker 10: that's the request for thirty thousand

00:20:41 Speaker 10: dollars additional funding to support this

00:20:42 Speaker 10: work, and that's related to a

00:20:45 Speaker 10: fairly late in the day announcement

00:20:45 Speaker 10: by the province. So the Ministry

00:20:46 Speaker 10: of Long Term Care announced just

00:20:48 Speaker 10: as we were starting to get

00:20:50 Speaker 10: to the point where, in fact,

00:20:51 Speaker 10: we'd already had done the slides

00:20:53 Speaker 10: for the report to go to

00:20:56 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management,

00:20:58 Speaker 10: as well as the report itself.

00:21:00 Speaker 10: The province announced a new funding

00:21:03 Speaker 10: stream. so the the province has

00:21:05 Speaker 10: long supported capital allocations towards long-term

00:21:08 Speaker 10: care for the creation of new

00:21:10 Speaker 10: bed spaces. Up until very recently,

00:21:14 Speaker 10: as I say, the last few

00:21:15 Speaker 10: few weeks really, that has been

00:21:16 Speaker 10: tied to new beds built to

00:21:18 Speaker 10: modern-day new standards. That's the one

00:21:20 Speaker 10: of the one of the reasons

00:21:22 Speaker 10: why we're building the new Rockwood

00:21:24 Speaker 10: Terrace was to take beds that

00:21:26 Speaker 10: were being delivered at a a

00:21:29 Speaker 10: class C level to create beds

00:21:31 Speaker 10: that were being delivered. at a

00:21:32 Speaker 10: class A level. So, the province

00:21:34 Speaker 10: has long provided capital funding to

00:21:36 Speaker 10: support that work. As I say,

00:21:38 Speaker 10: fairly late on in the day,

00:21:40 Speaker 10: they have introduced a new funding

00:21:43 Speaker 10: stream, which is a renovation funding

00:21:46 Speaker 10: stream. Now, there's not a great

00:21:48 Speaker 10: deal of details around what this

00:21:49 Speaker 10: is, other than they have indicated

00:21:51 Speaker 10: that there is capital funding pot,

00:21:54 Speaker 10: which is less generous than the

00:21:56 Speaker 10: new capital funding pot. It's a

00:22:00 Speaker 10: renovation capital funding pot that can

00:22:02 Speaker 10: go. towards renovations of existing long-term

00:22:05 Speaker 10: care beds to an alternative standard.

00:22:06 Speaker 10: Now, what they've they've been light

00:22:07 Speaker 10: on is what that alternative standard

00:22:09 Speaker 10: might look like. It's probably better

00:22:12 Speaker 10: than it is today, but not

00:22:13 Speaker 10: as good as the ones we're

00:22:15 Speaker 10: building and seeing in new facilities

00:22:18 Speaker 10: being built today. And so, the

00:22:20 Speaker 10: the intent we believe that the

00:22:21 Speaker 10: province on this one is they

00:22:24 Speaker 10: are up against a pressing need

00:22:26 Speaker 10: to activate long-term care beds. And

00:22:29 Speaker 10: so, I think. with new builds

00:22:31 Speaker 10: happening across the province, they're looking

00:22:33 Speaker 10: to see if there are opportunities

00:22:34 Speaker 10: for the reactivation of the beds

00:22:35 Speaker 10: which are being retired as those

00:22:37 Speaker 10: new beds come into being. It's

00:22:39 Speaker 10: quite clear that this is a

00:22:41 Speaker 10: very different programme to the capital

00:22:43 Speaker 10: funding stream. So the funding is

00:22:45 Speaker 10: only tied to a 15-year operating

00:22:47 Speaker 10: commitment rather than a longer-term operating

00:22:49 Speaker 10: agreement. The funding is less, and

00:22:50 Speaker 10: they have introduced this idea of

00:22:52 Speaker 10: an alternative standard. There are certain

00:22:54 Speaker 10: things that they've taken off the

00:22:54 Speaker 10: table when it. comes to the

00:22:56 Speaker 10: alternative standard, but the rest of

00:22:58 Speaker 10: the table is fairly empty and

00:23:00 Speaker 10: vacant, and we have no idea

00:23:02 Speaker 10: what it looks like. And so,

00:23:04 Speaker 10: with the announcement of this potential

00:23:06 Speaker 10: funding, we felt that it would

00:23:08 Speaker 10: be appropriate to request the Support

00:23:09 Speaker 10: Long Term Care Committee of Management

00:23:12 Speaker 10: and then Council to extend the

00:23:14 Speaker 10: scope of work to consider that

00:23:15 Speaker 10: renovation funding and what that could

00:23:16 Speaker 10: look like at Rockwood Terrace. Once

00:23:20 Speaker 10: again, at the conclusion of that

00:23:22 Speaker 10: report, the report will come back

00:23:27 Speaker 10: to Committee of the Whole. I'd

00:23:29 Speaker 10: be happy to take any questions.

00:23:31 Speaker 10: Okay, thank you. So it's on

00:23:35 Speaker 10: the floor for discussion. Deputy Warden.

00:23:37 Speaker 11: Thank you, Madam Warden, and thank

00:23:38 Speaker 11: you, Nile, for the report. Late

00:23:41 Speaker 11: in the day, desperation, hail Mary,

00:23:42 Speaker 11: however you want to describe it,

00:23:44 Speaker 11: that's what it sounds like to

00:23:46 Speaker 11: me by the provincial government. There's

00:23:48 Speaker 11: no doubt that there is a

00:23:49 Speaker 11: pressing need for long-term care beds

00:23:52 Speaker 11: in the province, but here

00:23:54 Speaker 11: in Grey County. Here in Gray

00:23:56 Speaker 11: County, we've already been down this

00:24:00 Speaker 11: road before. We decided to build

00:24:04 Speaker 11: the new facility in Durham. We

00:24:06 Speaker 11: had different contractors, different developers go

00:24:09 Speaker 11: through that building, and every one

00:24:11 Speaker 11: of them said it's cost prohibitive.

00:24:14 Speaker 11: Why, if are we even considering

00:24:15 Speaker 11: pouring another thirty thousand into the

00:24:17 Speaker 11: bucket to have the same outcome?

00:24:20 Speaker 11: I think we all know what

00:24:22 Speaker 11: the outcome would be, or what

00:24:23 Speaker 11: the answer might. be to a

00:24:25 Speaker 11: request for us to fund more

00:24:27 Speaker 11: beds, if the province is so

00:24:29 Speaker 11: hell bent on doing this, they

00:24:31 Speaker 11: put the thirty thousand in the

00:24:33 Speaker 11: bucket and they can fund the

00:24:36 Speaker 11: new beds. And they can also

00:24:38 Speaker 11: try to find staff, good staff

00:24:40 Speaker 11: that we have. There's not many

00:24:43 Speaker 11: of them because they're hard to

00:24:46 Speaker 11: find, but we've got good staff.

00:24:47 Speaker 11: I'm not sure there's a supply

00:24:51 Speaker 11: of good staff to fund another

00:24:54 Speaker 11: facility of this nature. So I

00:24:59 Speaker 11: am. not supportive of this right

00:25:01 Speaker 11: now, but I'll wait to see

00:25:04 Speaker 11: what my colleagues think. Thank you.

00:25:07 Speaker 11: Okay, thank you very much. Other

00:25:08 Speaker 12: discussion, Councillor Gray. I'll leave with

00:25:10 Speaker 12: a question right off the bat,

00:25:27 Speaker 12: either to Jen or Nile. What

00:25:27 Speaker 12: is the subsidy currently carried by

00:25:32 Speaker 13: the taxpayer through the tax levy

00:25:35 Speaker 13: for every bed we have right

00:25:38 Speaker 13: now in the County of Grey?

00:25:40 Speaker 13: I threw you, Madam Lord, in

00:25:42 Speaker 13: twenty-eight thousand dollars. So here's

00:25:44 Speaker 07: what I can support. I can

00:25:46 Speaker 07: support us continuing to look at

00:25:50 Speaker 07: an expansion of Grey Gables with

00:25:51 Speaker 07: a couple. Of Gray Gables with

00:25:56 Speaker 07: a couple extra pods, as it

00:25:57 Speaker 07: was originally designed, and could perhaps

00:26:00 Speaker 07: accommodate and create efficiencies in our

00:26:03 Speaker 07: service delivery, looking to minimize as

00:26:06 Speaker 07: best we can that cost per

00:26:08 Speaker 07: bed. I cannot support, and I'm

00:26:10 Speaker 07: going to add a little to

00:26:14 Speaker 07: my colleague here, Deputy Warden Milne.

00:26:16 Speaker 07: Even if they funded all the

00:26:19 Speaker 07: capital requirements, we haven't begun to

00:26:21 Speaker 07: talk about the operational costs, the

00:26:24 Speaker 07: service delivery. Costs of service delivery.

00:26:26 Speaker 07: We have talked about it around

00:26:28 Speaker 07: this table for several terms

00:26:32 Speaker 07: of council. We are not competitive

00:26:34 Speaker 07: with the private sector. I am

00:26:36 Speaker 07: completely in line with continuing our

00:26:39 Speaker 07: obligation and our excellent service provision

00:26:41 Speaker 07: for the beds that we currently

00:26:43 Speaker 07: have. Potentially, could add sixty-eight. Perhaps

00:26:46 Speaker 07: create efficiencies. That should be our

00:26:47 Speaker 07: goal in business as a corporation

00:26:49 Speaker 07: in service delivery. Look for service.

00:26:51 Speaker 07: for efficiencies in controlling the costs,

00:26:54 Speaker 07: but there is absolutely no way

00:26:57 Speaker 07: I can support further looking at

00:26:59 Speaker 07: thirty thousand dollars to expand the

00:27:00 Speaker 07: scope of the study to come

00:27:03 Speaker 07: back and tell us what we

00:27:04 Speaker 07: should already know sitting around this

00:27:06 Speaker 07: table today that we cannot compete

00:27:08 Speaker 07: with the private sector, and this

00:27:11 Speaker 07: is not something that we should

00:27:12 Speaker 07: be doing either this sitting council

00:27:14 Speaker 07: or regardless of the sitting council

00:27:17 Speaker 07: to get more information and come

00:27:19 Speaker 07: back. and tell us the same,

00:27:20 Speaker 07: the outcome that we already know

00:27:22 Speaker 07: today makes no sense and is

00:27:24 Speaker 07: a waste of thirty thousand dollars

00:27:25 Speaker 07: of taxpayers' dollars that should not

00:27:27 Speaker 07: be spent investigating this. Like Deputy

00:27:29 Speaker 07: Warden Milne said, if the province

00:27:30 Speaker 07: is so hell bent on it,

00:27:36 Speaker 07: then they can line up with

00:27:40 Speaker 14: a private provider and they can

00:27:41 Speaker 14: try to compete on that level

00:27:44 Speaker 14: in terms of bed expansion. But

00:27:46 Speaker 15: this is not for the County

00:27:48 Speaker 15: Grey to be pursuing. Okay, I'll

00:27:50 Speaker 15: look for any other discussion from

00:27:53 Speaker 15: council members, and I'll look back

00:27:54 Speaker 15: to staff. I'll go to the

00:27:57 Speaker 15: C.A.O. Thank you, and through you,

00:27:58 Speaker 15: Warden, and appreciate all the comments

00:28:00 Speaker 15: in terms of from from both

00:28:02 Speaker 15: Councillor Mill and Councillor Gregg with

00:28:03 Speaker 15: respect to with respect to this.

00:28:05 Speaker 15: Just wanted to highlight note that

00:28:08 Speaker 15: all the options that are that

00:28:12 Speaker 15: have been explored to date, as

00:28:15 Speaker 15: well as this particular option, from

00:28:18 Speaker 15: what I understand, looks at all

00:28:20 Speaker 15: options. in terms of either the

00:28:22 Speaker 15: county potentially owning and operating, the

00:28:23 Speaker 15: county owning and potentially leasing to

00:28:25 Speaker 15: a private operator, or divesting of

00:28:26 Speaker 15: that property for a potential use.

00:28:28 Speaker 15: That potential use could be this

00:28:30 Speaker 15: option in terms of a long-term

00:28:34 Speaker 15: care home option. Could be the

00:28:36 Speaker 15: other options that have already been

00:28:39 Speaker 15: explored to date. So I just

00:28:41 Speaker 15: wanted to flag that and note

00:28:43 Speaker 15: that that this would be part

00:28:45 Speaker 15: of my understanding that analysis is.

00:28:48 Speaker 15: that it's not necessarily looking at

00:28:50 Speaker 15: just the county owning and operating

00:28:53 Speaker 15: a long-term care facility under this

00:28:55 Speaker 15: new standard, under this new funding

00:28:57 Speaker 10: model. It could be somebody else

00:28:58 Speaker 10: potentially that could operate that as

00:29:02 Speaker 10: another option. So I don't know

00:29:03 Speaker 10: if Nile or Jen have anything

00:29:05 Speaker 10: further with respect to that. So

00:29:06 Speaker 10: through you, Madam Warden, the CIO

00:29:08 Speaker 10: is quite correct. This is this

00:29:10 Speaker 10: is in all cases. the consideration

00:29:13 Speaker 10: is it could be the county

00:29:16 Speaker 10: that operates, it could be a

00:29:19 Speaker 10: third-party private vendor, it could be

00:29:21 Speaker 10: some sort of a partnership arrangement

00:29:24 Speaker 10: in between those two things. And

00:29:26 Speaker 10: the other thing is just to

00:29:28 Speaker 10: to reinforce the any future the

00:29:30 Speaker 10: the the intent of the work

00:29:33 Speaker 10: being done is to inform the

00:29:34 Speaker 10: future debate around what to do

00:29:36 Speaker 10: with the existing long long-term care

00:29:38 Speaker 10: home at Rockwood Terrace and what

00:29:39 Speaker 10: to do with the existing allocation

00:29:41 Speaker 10: of. The existing allocations of capital

00:29:43 Speaker 10: funding at Grey Gables, and so

00:29:45 Speaker 10: that's that the the intent behind

00:29:47 Speaker 10: the report is simply to provide

00:29:48 Speaker 10: the information so that when we

00:29:54 Speaker 10: have those questions and conversations later

00:29:55 Speaker 10: on, there are no decisions being

00:29:59 Speaker 10: made at this point in time

00:30:00 Speaker 16: as to options that are preferred,

00:30:03 Speaker 16: options to explore over other options,

00:30:05 Speaker 16: or any sort of priority associated

00:30:10 Speaker 16: to those options. But you're quite

00:30:11 Speaker 16: correct. Okay, thank you. I'll go

00:30:13 Speaker 16: to Councillor Dobrine, and then over

00:30:18 Speaker 16: to Councillor Mackie. And then over

00:30:21 Speaker 16: to Councillor Mackey next. Thank you,

00:30:24 Speaker 16: Warden, and good morning. And thank

00:30:27 Speaker 16: you, Nile. I appreciate the concern.

00:30:30 Speaker 16: I I think I want to

00:30:33 Speaker 16: explore. Will this expanded scope? Think

00:30:35 Speaker 16: I heard the answer, but I

00:30:40 Speaker 16: just want to clarify. Will this

00:30:43 Speaker 16: expanded scope include options for Grey

00:30:47 Speaker 16: Gables? So, under we know that

00:30:50 Speaker 16: we have allocation for sixty-two new

00:30:53 Speaker 16: beds. To new beds in a

00:30:54 Speaker 16: new facility, brand new, similar to

00:30:57 Speaker 16: the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment, which would

00:30:58 Speaker 16: leave the existing Gray Gables for

00:31:00 Speaker 16: some other use. But could will

00:31:02 Speaker 16: this include exploring an expansion renovation

00:31:05 Speaker 10: to Gray Gables that could also

00:31:08 Speaker 10: incorporate those, if the province were

00:31:13 Speaker 10: agreeable, to to rather than than

00:31:15 Speaker 10: a total new build. So. that's

00:31:17 Speaker 10: kind of where my question is.

00:31:21 Speaker 10: So, to you, Madam Warden, thank

00:31:23 Speaker 10: you for the question. No, none

00:31:24 Speaker 10: of the thirty thousand would apply

00:31:26 Speaker 10: to Grey Gables. Grey Gables meets

00:31:27 Speaker 10: all provincial standards and is is

00:31:32 Speaker 17: not is not therefore scheduled for

00:31:37 Speaker 17: a renovation or or getting the

00:31:40 Speaker 17: renovated renovation funding. So, this is

00:31:42 Speaker 17: specific to renovation of retired retired,

00:31:45 Speaker 16: if you like, long term care

00:31:47 Speaker 16: beds. Long-term care beds, where and

00:31:50 Speaker 16: the only ones we will have

00:31:52 Speaker 16: are the ones that are in

00:31:56 Speaker 16: the existing Rockwood Terrace building.

00:32:02 Speaker 16: So this is very specific to

00:32:04 Speaker 16: Rockwood Terrace. Thank you, and I

00:32:08 Speaker 16: appreciate that. I I'm inclined to

00:32:12 Speaker 16: agree in that all the information

00:32:15 Speaker 16: that we had at the time

00:32:17 Speaker 16: of deciding on you know 100

00:32:19 Speaker 16: million dollars to redevelop Rockwood Terrace

00:32:21 Speaker 16: in Durham was based. on the

00:32:24 Speaker 16: information that the province saw our

00:32:27 Speaker 16: existing facility as undevelopable, unexpandable, and

00:32:31 Speaker 16: unsuitable. And now that we've invested

00:32:33 Speaker 16: and we are this close to

00:32:33 Speaker 16: opening, they have a change of

00:32:37 Speaker 16: heart, and everything that we knew

00:32:40 Speaker 16: then, or that the information that

00:32:42 Speaker 18: we had at our disposal to

00:32:44 Speaker 18: make that decision. was based that

00:32:47 Speaker 18: Rockwood Terrace should not be redeveloped,

00:32:49 Speaker 18: or could not be redeveloped. So,

00:32:51 Speaker 18: I'm inclined to agree. Thank you.

00:32:53 Speaker 18: Okay, we're going to go to

00:32:56 Speaker 18: Councillor Mackey, and then I'll look

00:32:59 Speaker 18: for other hands. Thank you, Madam

00:33:01 Speaker 18: Warden. Good morning, County Council. It

00:33:03 Speaker 18: is frustrating the fact that we're

00:33:05 Speaker 18: spending so much money on a

00:33:06 Speaker 18: new development when this information came

00:33:08 Speaker 18: out that the old one possibly

00:33:11 Speaker 18: could have been retrofitted. So I

00:33:15 Speaker 18: mean, I share that frustration with

00:33:16 Speaker 18: my colleagues. I agree with my

00:33:18 Speaker 18: friends across the the horseshoe in

00:33:19 Speaker 18: regards to the amount of money

00:33:20 Speaker 18: that Gray County has spent and

00:33:22 Speaker 18: is spending on long term care.

00:33:24 Speaker 18: I fully support the money that

00:33:26 Speaker 18: we are spending on long term

00:33:30 Speaker 18: care. It's important. We're doing a

00:33:31 Speaker 18: bang up job. Our elderly are

00:33:33 Speaker 18: well taken care of in our

00:33:35 Speaker 18: homes. and if I had to

00:33:36 Speaker 18: place a loved one in a

00:33:38 Speaker 18: home, I'd be hoping to get

00:33:39 Speaker 18: a county bed. That being said,

00:33:41 Speaker 18: I don't think we can afford

00:33:43 Speaker 18: to keep going with any more,

00:33:44 Speaker 18: whether it be Gregables expansion or

00:33:46 Speaker 18: an expansion of an old Rockwood.

00:33:48 Speaker 18: I just don't think we can

00:33:49 Speaker 18: afford, with all the other budgetary

00:33:50 Speaker 18: constraints that we're going to have.

00:33:52 Speaker 18: I don't think we can afford,

00:33:54 Speaker 18: you know, any more. The thirty

00:33:57 Speaker 18: thousand, when we had that discussion

00:33:58 Speaker 18: at the long-term care committee of

00:33:59 Speaker 18: management, is more about what are

00:34:02 Speaker 18: the next steps. for us? We

00:34:04 Speaker 18: know we're going to have a

00:34:05 Speaker 18: vacant Rockwood Terrace that we have

00:34:07 Speaker 18: to make some decisions on. It's

00:34:09 Speaker 18: going to cost us a fair

00:34:11 Speaker 18: a fair amount of dollars per

00:34:13 Speaker 18: month to keep that place, you

00:34:15 Speaker 18: know, empty, you know, with security

00:34:17 Speaker 18: and heating. So we got to

00:34:18 Speaker 18: make some decisions. I won't be

00:34:20 Speaker 18: making that decision, but members of

00:34:21 Speaker 18: this horseshoe that are elected will

00:34:23 Speaker 18: be making that decision. So the

00:34:25 Speaker 18: long-term care committee management just wanted

00:34:26 Speaker 18: to make sure that the new

00:34:28 Speaker 18: council has all the information to

00:34:30 Speaker 18: make make the best. To make

00:34:33 Speaker 18: the best informed decision, and that's

00:34:34 Speaker 18: really what this thirty thousand is

00:34:36 Speaker 18: about. And not that I like

00:34:37 Speaker 18: spending thirty thousand on something that

00:34:38 Speaker 18: I think I know the answer

00:34:40 Speaker 18: to. As far as you know,

00:34:42 Speaker 18: possible redevelopment of new beds, I

00:34:43 Speaker 18: don't think that's in the cards.

00:34:44 Speaker 18: But knowing what to do with

00:34:46 Speaker 18: that that building is going to

00:34:50 Speaker 18: you know have impact on well

00:34:52 Speaker 18: a campus of care. You know

00:34:55 Speaker 18: we've talked about a campus of

00:34:58 Speaker 18: care for a long time and

00:34:58 Speaker 18: that potential. I don't know what

00:35:01 Speaker 18: the cost of that would be,

00:35:03 Speaker 18: but we know we have a

00:35:04 Speaker 18: shortfall. in some of the other

00:35:06 Speaker 18: beds for seniors and some of

00:35:07 Speaker 18: the senior services that are required.

00:35:09 Speaker 18: You know we've got long-term care,

00:35:10 Speaker 18: we've got retirement homes, but we

00:35:12 Speaker 18: don't have that that missing link

00:35:13 Speaker 18: in between. So this information would

00:35:16 Speaker 18: provide more options on what we

00:35:17 Speaker 18: could do in that regard too.

00:35:18 Speaker 18: Affordable housing for seniors. There's a

00:35:21 Speaker 18: there's a lot of things that

00:35:22 Speaker 18: can be looked at through this

00:35:23 Speaker 18: thirty thousand dollars to help the

00:35:26 Speaker 18: new council make the decisions. You

00:35:27 Speaker 18: know that are going to have

00:35:30 Speaker 18: to be made. So I'll just

00:35:35 Speaker 18: leave it that, and I do

00:35:37 Speaker 19: support spending that money because I

00:35:39 Speaker 19: think that information. And this is

00:35:41 Speaker 19: on behalf of the Long Term

00:35:43 Speaker 19: Care Committee of Management. We had

00:35:45 Speaker 19: that discussion, and the committee thought

00:35:49 Speaker 20: that that money was going to

00:35:55 Speaker 20: be important for the new council

00:36:01 Speaker 20: to make informed decisions. I'll leave

00:36:04 Speaker 20: it at that. Thank you. Thank

00:36:08 Speaker 20: you, and I'll just look for

00:36:11 Speaker 20: any other input. Okay, Councillor Greg.

00:36:14 Speaker 20: I would like to place an

00:36:18 Speaker 20: amendment on the floor. to remove

00:36:19 Speaker 20: the last of the three bullets

00:36:22 Speaker 20: there that staff beeps directed to

00:36:25 Speaker 20: extend the scope of work with

00:36:28 Speaker 20: Colliers to investigate scenario five. I

00:36:30 Speaker 20: am totally. I understand Chair Mackey's

00:36:33 Speaker 20: comments, but perhaps Nile could remind

00:36:35 Speaker 20: Council what the expenditure on the

00:36:37 Speaker 20: original consultant's study was. for this

00:36:40 Speaker 20: project. Most of, I think, what

00:36:42 Speaker 20: you spoke to should be contained

00:36:44 Speaker 20: in already the considerable sum of

00:36:46 Speaker 20: money that we hired the colliers

00:36:48 Speaker 07: to pre-provide information back to this

00:36:53 Speaker 07: council for already. So, I understand

00:36:56 Speaker 07: where you're coming from and representing

00:37:06 Speaker 07: the committee, but I think value

00:37:11 Speaker 07: for money in terms of the

00:37:13 Speaker 21: bids and tenders and the deliverables

00:37:15 Speaker 21: and that. original that original project

00:37:16 Speaker 21: scope, it should certainly have already

00:37:17 Speaker 21: entertained. I think most of what

00:37:19 Speaker 21: you're just mentioning there, because it

00:37:21 Speaker 21: was significant, and that was what

00:37:24 Speaker 21: we were talking about was future

00:37:26 Speaker 21: uses. Okay, so there was a

00:37:28 Speaker 21: question about the holistic costing. I'll

00:37:30 Speaker 21: leave it to staff. Okay. Perhaps

00:37:32 Speaker 21: let me see procedurally. Okay. Well,

00:37:34 Speaker 21: there's been a move, but also

00:37:35 Speaker 21: embedded into that is a question.

00:37:36 Speaker 21: So I think what I better

00:37:39 Speaker 21: do is I better call for

00:37:41 Speaker 21: a second or first before we

00:37:42 Speaker 21: go into further dialogueue on that.

00:37:44 Speaker 21: So Councillor Gregg has moved that

00:37:49 Speaker 21: the motion be amended to strike

00:37:51 Speaker 21: out the third clause of the

00:37:54 Speaker 21: motion regarding extending the scope of

00:37:56 Speaker 21: work with Colliers. Is there a

00:37:58 Speaker 21: second or for that? Is there

00:38:00 Speaker 21: a seconder for that? We've got

00:38:03 Speaker 10: a seconder by Councillor McKay, so

00:38:05 Speaker 10: that's now on the floor for

00:38:09 Speaker 10: discussion. So now I will look

00:38:11 Speaker 10: to staff to provide answers to

00:38:14 Speaker 10: the questions, and then we will

00:38:17 Speaker 10: move into discussion only on this

00:38:19 Speaker 10: particular motion. Thank you, Madam Warden.

00:38:23 Speaker 10: The total scope of work that

00:38:26 Speaker 10: Colliers have been engaged with with

00:38:28 Speaker 10: their subconsultants and subtrades to this

00:38:31 Speaker 10: point in time has a total

00:38:34 Speaker 10: approved budget of around about $195,000.

00:38:35 Speaker 10: Ninety-five thousand dollars. It does cover

00:38:36 Speaker 10: most of the options that were

00:38:39 Speaker 10: were listed by by the question

00:38:41 Speaker 10: in terms of future uses for

00:38:42 Speaker 10: for long-term care. The request for

00:38:44 Speaker 10: the thirty thousand is very specific

00:38:46 Speaker 10: to renovation of Rockwood Terrace. has

00:38:47 Speaker 10: a hundred and a hundred beds

00:38:52 Speaker 10: currently. The the thirty thousand would

00:38:54 Speaker 10: figure out what the alternative standard

00:38:56 Speaker 10: that the ministry is articulating. could

00:38:57 Speaker 10: look like how many of those

00:38:59 Speaker 10: alternative standard beds would be able

00:39:00 Speaker 10: to be provided within the fabric

00:39:04 Speaker 10: of the building, and what the

00:39:06 Speaker 10: capital construction costs and operating costs

00:39:08 Speaker 10: of that building would be on

00:39:11 Speaker 10: a go forward basis. That's not

00:39:13 Speaker 10: a scenario that was originally considered

00:39:15 Speaker 10: in that scope of work because,

00:39:16 Speaker 10: as has been indicated by members

00:39:18 Speaker 10: of council, there was no funding

00:39:21 Speaker 10: available previously for renovation funding. So

00:39:25 Speaker 10: this this happened quite late in

00:39:29 Speaker 22: the day. So the scope. of

00:39:31 Speaker 22: that thirty thousand is very specific

00:39:32 Speaker 22: to the renovation of the existing

00:39:33 Speaker 22: Rockwood Terrace to some number of

00:39:36 Speaker 22: long-term care beds. It would be

00:39:37 Speaker 22: somewhere less than a hundred because

00:39:39 Speaker 22: the alternative standard will be better

00:39:41 Speaker 22: than the standard we provide today,

00:39:48 Speaker 22: but we have no idea what

00:39:51 Speaker 23: that would be, and therefore what

00:39:53 Speaker 23: the the operating and capital costs

00:39:54 Speaker 23: would be associated to it. Okay,

00:39:57 Speaker 23: thank you. Any discussion on this

00:39:59 Speaker 23: particular? motion? Okay, I'm not seeing

00:40:00 Speaker 02: any hands up. Then I'll call

00:40:02 Speaker 02: the question on this one. That

00:40:03 Speaker 02: that the motion be that we

00:40:05 Speaker 02: strike out the third clause of

00:40:08 Speaker 02: the motion regarding the extending of

00:40:09 Speaker 02: the scope of work with Colliers.

00:40:11 Speaker 02: All those in favour of this

00:40:13 Speaker 02: motion? Okay, that's carried. So, Madam

00:40:17 Speaker 02: Clerk, that then strikes out back

00:40:20 Speaker 02: to the main motion that has

00:40:23 Speaker 02: already been. moved, which was only

00:40:25 Speaker 02: this report, not the rest of

00:40:26 Speaker 02: the long term care, not the

00:40:28 Speaker 02: adoption of the minutes and the

00:40:30 Speaker 02: rest of the long term care

00:40:31 Speaker 02: committee of management minutes, and the

00:40:35 Speaker 02: resolutions contained therein. So we're now

00:40:37 Speaker 02: back to the main motion, which

00:40:40 Speaker 02: you can see is now reduced

00:40:43 Speaker 02: to only these two points of

00:40:46 Speaker 02: this LTCRCM twenty sixteen twenty six

00:40:48 Speaker 02: report: the recommendation that the Colliers

00:40:52 Speaker 02: Project Leaders report and report and

00:40:54 Speaker 02: presentation. regarding the future options for

00:40:56 Speaker 02: grey cables and the existing Rockward

00:40:58 Speaker 02: Terrace be received for information, and

00:41:02 Speaker 02: that staff continue discussions with the

00:41:04 Speaker 02: Ministry of Long Term Care in

00:41:05 Speaker 02: respect to previous ministry surveys and

00:41:09 Speaker 02: future planning, and report back to

00:41:11 Speaker 02: Council as appropriate. So that has

00:41:13 Speaker 02: been moved, and who? Sorry, who

00:41:15 Speaker 02: moved and seconded that? We had

00:41:17 Speaker 02: that one moved by Councillor Gregg

00:41:20 Speaker 02: and seconded by Councillor. Oh, sorry.

00:41:22 Speaker 02: No, it was Councillor. I yes,

00:41:25 Speaker 02: it was carried. It was moved

00:41:27 Speaker 02: by Councillor Dicker and seconded by

00:41:31 Speaker 02: Councillor Mackie. Yes, correct. Okay, good.

00:41:32 Speaker 02: All right. So with that, then

00:41:34 Speaker 02: any further discussion on these two

00:41:36 Speaker 02: items in this report? Okay. All

00:41:37 Speaker 02: those in favour, and that is

00:41:41 Speaker 02: carried. Now we're going to return

00:41:44 Speaker 02: to the remainder of the minutes

00:41:48 Speaker 02: of the Long Term Care Committee

00:41:53 Speaker 02: of Management, which included the other

00:41:55 Speaker 02: resolutions. that were in there that

00:41:58 Speaker 24: have been duly circulated and shared

00:42:00 Speaker 24: in the public distribution of the

00:42:02 Speaker 24: agenda, and for that now I

00:42:07 Speaker 24: will need a fresh mover and

00:42:10 Speaker 24: a seconder for this. Move by

00:42:11 Speaker 09: Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the Deputy

00:42:14 Speaker 09: Warden. It's now on the floor

00:42:15 Speaker 09: for discussion. Any discussion on these

00:42:17 Speaker 09: resolutions? Oh, sorry. We're going to

00:42:19 Speaker 09: circle back to staff. Good morning,

00:42:21 Speaker 09: Director Cornell. Good morning, Warden, and

00:42:22 Speaker 09: good morning, County Council. And I

00:42:25 Speaker 09: don't need to go through the

00:42:27 Speaker 09: motions that are there. If there's

00:42:29 Speaker 09: any questions, I'm happy to answer

00:42:32 Speaker 09: them. Okay, so we'll begin with

00:42:33 Speaker 09: Councillor McLean. Good morning, Warden, and

00:42:35 Speaker 09: good morning, County Council, and to

00:42:37 Speaker 09: you, Jen. Just with regards to

00:42:39 Speaker 09: the first part, it talks about

00:42:40 Speaker 09: the future of Ray Gables. Gray

00:42:42 Speaker 09: Gables, we have had lots of

00:42:45 Speaker 09: reports going back to 2022 where

00:42:45 Speaker 09: they looked at the option of

00:42:50 Speaker 09: building a new 128 bed facility

00:42:51 Speaker 09: and the other part of creating

00:42:55 Speaker 09: the remainder older Gray Gables into

00:42:57 Speaker 09: a long term or assisted living.

00:43:01 Speaker 09: It was supposed to come back,

00:43:04 Speaker 09: it never did. I'm trying to

00:43:07 Speaker 09: think 2022 or thereabouts, and but

00:43:09 Speaker 09: we've spent money on that. Maybe

00:43:11 Speaker 09: you know that needs to be

00:43:14 Speaker 09: dusted off and brought back to

00:43:15 Speaker 09: this body or or future body

00:43:18 Speaker 09: of this horseshoe. But there was

00:43:20 Speaker 09: a lot of recommendations. in that.

00:43:23 Speaker 09: But the point I want to

00:43:24 Speaker 09: make is, when the application was

00:43:27 Speaker 09: made in November of 2019, which

00:43:29 Speaker 09: we got granted in 2020 itself,

00:43:31 Speaker 09: was to build, to get an

00:43:33 Speaker 09: additional 62 bids to build a

00:43:35 Speaker 09: new facility. It was raised here

00:43:36 Speaker 09: that I think by Councillor Greg

00:43:38 Speaker 09: that are there options of adding

00:43:40 Speaker 09: on versus building a brand new

00:43:43 Speaker 09: facility. because the part of building,

00:43:45 Speaker 09: as Councillor or Scott Mackey had

00:43:46 Speaker 09: said, you know, it's a cost.

00:43:48 Speaker 09: But I don't know has there

00:43:50 Speaker 09: had been those conversations with the

00:43:52 Speaker 09: ministry? And certainly, Rockmore Terrace has

00:43:54 Speaker 09: to be finished and and moved

00:43:55 Speaker 09: forward. But there are those beds,

00:43:56 Speaker 09: those sixty two beds, to reallocate

00:43:58 Speaker 09: those to an addition versus a

00:43:59 Speaker 09: brand new build. Do we have

00:44:02 Speaker 09: to make a new application, or

00:44:04 Speaker 09: we had some conversations about that?

00:44:06 Speaker 09: Because it's always been talked about.

00:44:07 Speaker 09: is building that fourth wing onto

00:44:09 Speaker 09: Grey Gables, and I thought there

00:44:11 Speaker 09: was a report. We've been getting

00:44:13 Speaker 09: reports back to 2016 around this

00:44:15 Speaker 09: horseshoe. It talks about the bones

00:44:18 Speaker 09: are good at Grey Gables. I

00:44:22 Speaker 09: think we all some of those

00:44:24 Speaker 09: have been here, have heard that

00:44:26 Speaker 09: the bones are good, that the

00:44:28 Speaker 09: infrastructure is good. It was commissioned

00:44:30 Speaker 09: in 1999 or 2000 thereabouts. So,

00:44:32 Speaker 09: but at the time, and I

00:44:36 Speaker 09: think we all agree, assisted living

00:44:38 Speaker 09: is certainly something that is a

00:44:40 Speaker 09: need as well. But one of

00:44:42 Speaker 09: those reports that came back did

00:44:43 Speaker 09: show. on the assisted living that

00:44:45 Speaker 09: it's a revenue generator that helps

00:44:46 Speaker 09: offset the cost of building a

00:44:48 Speaker 09: brand new 128 bed facility. With

00:44:50 Speaker 09: the point that the 62 beds

00:44:52 Speaker 09: will be funded, the remaining 66

00:44:54 Speaker 09: beds isn't funded by the province.

00:44:56 Speaker 09: But there was a report that

00:44:58 Speaker 09: showed that it was cost benefit,

00:45:00 Speaker 09: not assisted living, but these initial

00:45:01 Speaker 09: outlay of cash to build both.

00:45:03 Speaker 09: I don't know where. that conversation

00:45:05 Speaker 09: or conversations with the ministry. It

00:45:07 Speaker 09: seems to be hung up on

00:45:10 Speaker 09: the old Rockwood Terrace, and I

00:45:11 Speaker 09: think even on the old Rockwood

00:45:13 Speaker 09: Terrace there was conversations around this

00:45:15 Speaker 09: horseshoe. Different times, it would make

00:45:16 Speaker 09: a good assisted living. It would

00:45:18 Speaker 09: complement the new Rockwood Terrace, which

00:45:19 Speaker 09: is a long-term care facility. We've

00:45:21 Speaker 09: dealt with that, but that was

00:45:23 Speaker 09: some of the conversation. I think

00:45:24 Speaker 09: we would all agree. Why would

00:45:26 Speaker 09: we create another long-term care facility

00:45:27 Speaker 09: in in the area where the

00:45:28 Speaker 09: new Rockwood Terrace is to create

00:45:30 Speaker 09: competition as as Council Miller has

00:45:32 Speaker 09: said, Deputy Warden is if you're

00:45:34 Speaker 09: competing with staffing in that area,

00:45:36 Speaker 09: which I don't know why they

00:45:37 Speaker 09: don't get that, but anyway, we

00:45:39 Speaker 09: don't go there. Anyway, I'm just

00:45:41 Speaker 09: going back to the part that

00:45:43 Speaker 09: there is a report that did

00:45:44 Speaker 09: come out that talked about building

00:45:45 Speaker 09: a brand new Grey Gables in

00:45:46 Speaker 09: assisted living. But I do think

00:45:47 Speaker 09: at some point we need to

00:45:48 Speaker 09: ask a question or have some

00:45:49 Speaker 09: kind of a report by what

00:45:50 Speaker 09: does it look like to add

00:45:52 Speaker 09: the 62 beds to the current

00:45:57 Speaker 09: Grey Gables at some point in

00:45:58 Speaker 21: the future. I think that. option

00:46:00 Speaker 21: it never was, and the bids

00:46:00 Speaker 21: that were applied were never applied

00:46:02 Speaker 21: that way. Anyway, leave it at

00:46:04 Speaker 21: that. I don't know if Jen

00:46:06 Speaker 21: has more, but there's a lot

00:46:08 Speaker 21: of reports that have been there

00:46:09 Speaker 21: in the past that maybe we

00:46:11 Speaker 21: don't need to spend more money,

00:46:12 Speaker 21: but there's a lot of stuff

00:46:14 Speaker 21: there that need to be dusted

00:46:16 Speaker 21: off maybe at some point. Thank

00:46:17 Speaker 21: you. Okay, we're going to start

00:46:18 Speaker 21: with the CEO, and then to

00:46:31 Speaker 21: Director Cornell, and then of course

00:46:32 Speaker 03: we need to focus on the

00:46:34 Speaker 21: fact of what was just reported

00:46:37 Speaker 21: in this portion of of your

00:46:40 Speaker 21: report. So we really do. need

00:46:41 Speaker 21: to stay on this agenda, acknowledging

00:46:42 Speaker 21: that there's a has been a

00:46:44 Speaker 21: lot of hard work, a lot

00:46:46 Speaker 21: of contemplation, a lot of reports

00:46:47 Speaker 21: done that have supported us to

00:46:49 Speaker 21: the place where we are now

00:46:52 Speaker 21: with the long term care facilities

00:46:54 Speaker 21: that we have. So, with that,

00:46:55 Speaker 21: CAO. Okay. So, and yes, thank

00:46:57 Speaker 21: you. But, Councillor McQueen, we've already

00:46:59 Speaker 21: voted on that, so. we're not

00:47:01 Speaker 15: having further discussion on that. So,

00:47:03 Speaker 15: thank you. Appreciate the highlights again

00:47:05 Speaker 15: of all the hard work that's

00:47:08 Speaker 15: gone in and all the wealth

00:47:09 Speaker 15: of information that is provided to

00:47:11 Speaker 15: us as we make our decisions

00:47:12 Speaker 15: moving forward. So, with that, I'll

00:47:16 Speaker 15: just look to the CAO and

00:47:19 Speaker 15: Director Cornell. Through you, Warren. I

00:47:21 Speaker 15: think you just answered that. If

00:47:25 Speaker 15: that's that matter was part of

00:47:27 Speaker 15: the the previous report that was

00:47:29 Speaker 15: just passed as part of that

00:47:31 Speaker 15: motion, there is information with respect

00:47:33 Speaker 02: to some preliminary information with respect.

00:47:36 Speaker 02: to the options that have been

00:47:38 Speaker 02: analysed as part of of Gray

00:47:39 Speaker 02: Gables, and that can be found

00:47:42 Speaker 02: in the Long Term Care Committee

00:47:43 Speaker 02: Manager Report that's referenced in that

00:47:46 Speaker 02: motion that was just previously passed.

00:47:48 Speaker 02: If and so there is some

00:47:50 Speaker 02: information with respect to Gray Gables

00:47:52 Speaker 02: analysis in that report. Okay, and

00:47:53 Speaker 02: I see the director nodding her

00:47:54 Speaker 02: head. Okay, all right. Anything further

00:47:56 Speaker 02: then on the items that were

00:47:59 Speaker 02: under? that are under consideration on

00:48:01 Speaker 02: the floor right now. Okay, I'm

00:48:02 Speaker 02: not seeing any further hands go

00:48:03 Speaker 02: up. Therefore, I'll call the vote.

00:48:06 Speaker 02: Then, all those in favour, and

00:48:08 Speaker 02: that motion is carried. Thank you.

00:48:10 Speaker 02: Thank you very much, Director Cornell

00:48:13 Speaker 02: and CEO, and Deputy CEO for

00:48:15 Speaker 02: walking us through this. Although we're

00:48:16 Speaker 02: going to call on you in

00:48:19 Speaker 02: just a moment, we're going to

00:48:21 Speaker 02: do item five D now. It

00:48:23 Speaker 02: was a very long day on

00:48:25 Speaker 02: July 16th, but it was

00:48:28 Speaker 02: also a great opportunity to. to

00:48:32 Speaker 02: be there in person and see

00:48:34 Speaker 02: the progress, and it was it

00:48:36 Speaker 02: was time well spent together. So

00:48:38 Speaker 02: with that, there was a second

00:48:39 Speaker 02: portion in which the long term

00:48:40 Speaker 02: care redevelopment task force also met,

00:48:42 Speaker 02: and so it's recommended that the

00:48:49 Speaker 02: long term care redevelop the long

00:48:50 Speaker 02: term care redevelopment task force minutes

5.d Long Term Care Redevelopment Task Force minutes dated July 16, 2026

The Council adopted resolutions regarding the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment update for informational purposes. A correction was noted in the minutes to reflect accurate attendance records before discussion commenced. The report highlighted significant construction progress, including the completion of major structural elements and a successful inspection of the grounding grid. Stakeholders celebrated milestones achieved by the construction crew and consultants during a recent gathering. The project remains on budget despite seasonal challenges, with a planned transition period scheduled for early next year. Final occupancy is anticipated after operational preparations and a mandatory ministry inspection are completed.

00:48:51 Speaker 25: dated July sixteenth, twenty twenty six,

00:48:54 Speaker 25: be adopted as presented, and that

00:48:56 Speaker 25: the following resolutions contained therein be

00:48:59 Speaker 25: endorsed: that the Rockwood Terrace redevelopment

00:49:01 Speaker 25: update from Collier's project. leaders be

00:49:02 Speaker 25: received for information, and so again

00:49:04 Speaker 21: they were presenting at both of

00:49:06 Speaker 21: both the task force as well

00:49:08 Speaker 21: as the previous committee. Just before

00:49:10 Speaker 21: I look for a mover and

00:49:12 Speaker 21: a seconder, Madam Deputy Clerk, I

00:49:17 Speaker 21: understand there's a correction in the

00:49:19 Speaker 21: minute notes regarding attendance. Thank you,

00:49:21 Speaker 21: Madam Warden. Through you, I will

00:49:23 Speaker 10: note there's a correction in the

00:49:26 Speaker 10: minutes to include Councillor Greg and

00:49:28 Speaker 10: Councillor Hutchinson as not in attendance.

00:49:30 Speaker 10: Thank you. Okay. Thank you. So,

00:49:33 Speaker 10: with that clarification and that correction,

00:49:37 Speaker 10: may I ask for a mover

00:49:40 Speaker 10: and a seconder? Thank you. Moved

00:49:43 Speaker 10: by Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor

00:49:45 Speaker 10: McKay. So, it's now on the

00:49:48 Speaker 10: floor for discussion. And with that,

00:49:51 Speaker 10: I'll welcome back the Deputy CEO.

00:49:52 Speaker 10: Good morning, once again. This one,

00:49:55 Speaker 10: I suspect, will be slightly quicker.

00:49:57 Speaker 10: So, I will quickly cover some

00:49:59 Speaker 10: of the highlights from the redevelop.

00:50:01 Speaker 10: The redevelopment task force meeting. We

00:50:04 Speaker 10: did meet over lunch with members

00:50:06 Speaker 10: of committee of management and the

00:50:09 Speaker 10: redevelopment task force joining us. Malu

00:50:10 Speaker 10: Blamey, our site contractor, put on

00:50:12 Speaker 10: a barbecue to recognise significant milestones

00:50:14 Speaker 10: in the Rockwood Terrace build. To

00:50:18 Speaker 10: extend their thanks to the the

00:50:20 Speaker 10: multiple trades consultants and sub trades

00:50:22 Speaker 10: that they're working with, and the

00:50:24 Speaker 10: warden was able to offer some

00:50:25 Speaker 10: words of of. To offer some

00:50:27 Speaker 10: words of thanks to members of

00:50:28 Speaker 10: the construction crew who were able

00:50:30 Speaker 10: to join us over over the

00:50:32 Speaker 10: balance of lunchtime, the build has

00:50:35 Speaker 10: passed the fifty fifty percent completion

00:50:37 Speaker 10: mark. Earlier that day, we had

00:50:38 Speaker 10: had the fantastic news that the

00:50:40 Speaker 10: grounding grid, which had proven to

00:50:41 Speaker 10: be a little bit challenging and

00:50:43 Speaker 10: is a major step towards energising

00:50:46 Speaker 10: the building, had passed its ESA

00:50:49 Speaker 10: inspection, and and so so it

00:50:52 Speaker 10: was a good time to pause

00:50:55 Speaker 10: and celebrate. the work that had

00:50:58 Speaker 10: been done, and look ahead to

00:51:01 Speaker 10: the work that is yet to

00:51:03 Speaker 10: come. We did a tour of

00:51:05 Speaker 10: the building, which is beginning to

00:51:08 Speaker 10: look very much like a finished

00:51:09 Speaker 10: building now. And we and we

00:51:11 Speaker 10: saw significant progress since the last

00:51:15 Speaker 10: time members of committee and council

00:51:16 Speaker 10: were able to visit the building.

00:51:17 Speaker 10: So we had a good walk

00:51:18 Speaker 10: around the building, explored the various

00:51:21 Speaker 10: different resident rooms, staffing areas, and

00:51:22 Speaker 10: some of the lounge lounge spaces.

00:51:24 Speaker 10: Colliers provided us a comprehensive construction.

00:51:25 Speaker 10: The comprehensive construction update report detailing

00:51:26 Speaker 10: the advanced completion works of the

00:51:30 Speaker 10: masonry. The windows are 95, 95

00:51:33 Speaker 10: plus percent complete at that point

00:51:34 Speaker 10: in time. Framing and drywall largely

00:51:37 Speaker 10: complete across the entire building. Indeed,

00:51:39 Speaker 10: some priming paint had been done,

00:51:41 Speaker 10: and we got an opportunity to

00:51:43 Speaker 10: walk through the two mocked-up resident

00:51:45 Speaker 10: rooms, which were largely complete in

00:51:49 Speaker 10: terms of in terms of their

00:51:51 Speaker 10: mock-up, so that we can see

00:51:56 Speaker 10: the final finish of the the

00:51:58 Speaker 10: light fitting. Finish of the the

00:52:00 Speaker 10: light fittings, the door fixtures, the

00:52:02 Speaker 10: wall fixtures, and so on and

00:52:04 Speaker 10: so forth. So we were able

00:52:05 Speaker 10: to have a good wander around

00:52:07 Speaker 10: the building and see the various

00:52:10 Speaker 10: progress that has been made. Collier

00:52:13 Speaker 10: has identified that we remain on

00:52:15 Speaker 10: budget. We do have a slight

00:52:17 Speaker 10: pressure of time now on the

00:52:19 Speaker 10: building after a very difficult construction

00:52:23 Speaker 10: season during the winter. But as

00:52:26 Speaker 10: of the last schedule, we remain

00:52:27 Speaker 10: ready to take the building over

00:52:29 Speaker 10: in early 2027. with approximately a

00:52:30 Speaker 10: three to four month warming up

00:52:32 Speaker 10: phase before occupancy in April time

00:52:34 Speaker 10: of next year. And that that

00:52:38 Speaker 10: that period between us assuming the

00:52:40 Speaker 10: building and actually occupying the building

00:52:42 Speaker 10: from a long term care perspective

00:52:43 Speaker 10: is to enable us to get

00:52:45 Speaker 10: all our operational plans in place,

00:52:47 Speaker 10: train staff, onboard new staff, and

00:52:48 Speaker 10: pass the absolutely critical last in

00:52:50 Speaker 10: person ministry inspection. And that ministry

00:52:52 Speaker 10: inspection has to be scheduled. when,

00:52:53 Speaker 10: essentially, the building is fully operational

00:52:55 Speaker 10: from a staffing and a staffing

00:52:56 Speaker 10: and resource capacity perspective, so they

00:52:58 Speaker 10: can inspect it as a fully

00:53:00 Speaker 10: operational long-term care home. The only

00:53:03 Speaker 10: thing that will be missing for

00:53:05 Speaker 10: that inspection will be the residents,

00:53:06 Speaker 10: and then shortly after that, we're

00:53:08 Speaker 10: anticipating in mid-April welcoming residents to

00:53:09 Speaker 10: the long-term care home. The schedule

00:53:10 Speaker 10: continues to be a cross focus

00:53:13 Speaker 10: as we go forward of both

00:53:14 Speaker 10: the Colliers team, indeed. the Great

00:53:16 Speaker 10: County team, and the Millwall Blamey

00:53:18 Speaker 10: team, meeting on a very regular

00:53:20 Speaker 10: basis to make sure that as

00:53:21 Speaker 10: we advance that work, we're

00:53:24 Speaker 10: keeping eyes on the finishes that

00:53:27 Speaker 10: are going in. And a key

00:53:29 Speaker 10: piece that's being moved forward at

00:53:31 Speaker 10: the minute is the landscaping work.

00:53:33 Speaker 10: The site is extensive; two new

00:53:34 Speaker 10: municipal streets need to be created,

00:53:37 Speaker 10: several parking areas, a stormwater management

00:53:38 Speaker 10: pond needs to be landscaped, as

00:53:39 Speaker 10: well as the other landscaping. And

00:53:40 Speaker 10: we were able to see the

00:53:42 Speaker 10: significant work that's already been done

00:53:44 Speaker 10: in the central courtyard area. The

00:53:45 Speaker 10: central courtyard for members that were

00:53:49 Speaker 10: able to join us is is

00:53:52 Speaker 26: one of the highlights of this

00:53:56 Speaker 26: building. It really does create an

00:53:58 Speaker 26: incredibly nice space in the centre

00:54:00 Speaker 26: of the building with both recreation

00:54:03 Speaker 26: lounges overlooking the space and accessible

00:54:05 Speaker 26: pathways throughout that entire area. So

00:54:07 Speaker 26: a real a real joy to

00:54:09 Speaker 26: to see that work coming on.

00:54:10 Speaker 26: So it was a it was

00:54:11 Speaker 26: a it was a good news

00:54:13 Speaker 26: story after after a good lunch

00:54:15 Speaker 26: where we were able to

00:54:21 Speaker 26: celebrate the hard work of the

00:54:24 Speaker 26: hundreds of staff that have been

00:54:26 Speaker 26: working on the. site to make

00:54:28 Speaker 26: it come to fruition, and I'll

00:54:29 Speaker 26: be happy to take questions. Okay,

00:54:31 Speaker 26: thank you. So, any questions on

00:54:33 Speaker 26: this report, this report, these minutes?

00:54:35 Speaker 26: Okay, all right then. I'm not

00:54:37 Speaker 26: seeing any questions. So, all those

00:54:40 Speaker 26: in favour, and that motion

00:54:42 Speaker 26: is carried. Thank you. We do

00:54:45 Speaker 26: not have any closed session matters

00:54:47 Speaker 26: to deal with on our council

00:54:49 Speaker 26: agenda this morning, nor reports that

00:54:54 Speaker 26: allows us to go to the.

8 By-laws

Council considered six specific bylaws addressing infrastructure financing, land easements for the CP Rail Trail, medical programme agreements, and wildlife control measures. The assembly approved legislation to authorise borrowing from Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, grant easements on the Eco Parkway, amend a memorandum of understanding with Rural Ontario Medical Programme, remove nuisance beavers, and control coyotes or wolves. Councillors moved and seconded the motion for unanimous passage, sealing these documents into the official bylaw book.

00:54:57 Speaker 26: bylaws. We do have a number

00:54:59 Speaker 26: of them. That there are actually

00:55:02 Speaker 26: six bylaws. So it is recommended

00:55:04 Speaker 26: that bylaws 5296262530126 be inclusive, be

00:55:08 Speaker 26: introduced and taken at as read

00:55:10 Speaker 26: a first, second, and third time.

00:55:13 Speaker 26: Finally, passed, signed by the warden

00:55:14 Speaker 26: and the clerk, sealed with the

00:55:16 Speaker 26: seal of the corporation, and engrossed

00:55:18 Speaker 26: into the bylaw book. First one

00:55:19 Speaker 26: is 529626, which is a bylaw

00:55:21 Speaker 26: to authorise the submission of an

00:55:24 Speaker 26: application. of to Ontario Infrastructure and

00:55:26 Speaker 26: Lands Corporation for financing of certain

00:55:28 Speaker 26: capital works and to authorise long-term

00:55:30 Speaker 26: borrowing for such capital works through

00:55:32 Speaker 26: the issue of debentures to OILC.

00:55:34 Speaker 26: Next one is 529726, a bylaw

00:55:36 Speaker 26: to authorise the granting of an

00:55:39 Speaker 26: easement and to authorise a donation

00:55:41 Speaker 26: agreement to convey lands forming part

00:55:43 Speaker 26: of the CP Rail Trail, the

00:55:45 Speaker 26: Eco Parkway. Number three is bylaw

00:55:47 Speaker 26: fifty two ninety eight twenty six,

00:55:49 Speaker 26: a bylaw to authorise the warden

00:55:51 Speaker 26: and clerk to execute an amendment

00:55:57 Speaker 26: to the memorandum of understanding between

00:56:01 Speaker 26: the County of Grey and the

00:56:04 Speaker 26: City of Owen Sound and the

00:56:06 Speaker 26: Rural Ontario Medical Programme. And I,

00:56:09 Speaker 27: the fourth item is fifty two

00:56:12 Speaker 27: ninety nine twenty six, a bylaw

00:56:14 Speaker 27: to provide for the removal of

00:56:17 Speaker 27: the nuisance beaver of nuisance beaver

00:56:18 Speaker 27: and fifty three zero zero twenty

00:56:21 Speaker 28: six, a bylaw to provide the

00:56:24 Speaker 28: for the To provide for the

00:56:25 Speaker 28: control of coyotes and or wolves,

00:56:27 Speaker 28: and fifty three oh one twenty

00:56:31 Speaker 28: six bylaw to confirm all actions

00:56:36 Speaker 28: and proceedings of council. May I

00:56:38 Speaker 28: ask for a mover and a

00:56:40 Speaker 28: seconder? Moved by Councillor Gregg, seconded

00:56:42 Speaker 28: by Councillor Patterson. It's now on

00:56:45 Speaker 28: the floor for any discussion. Councillor

00:56:49 Speaker 28: Eccles. Thank you. Bylaw, it's one

00:56:55 Speaker 29: to do with Southgate and CP

00:57:01 Speaker 29: Rail lands. In our committee as

00:57:03 Speaker 29: a whole, we have another report

00:57:05 Speaker 29: that there's more land. Is when

00:57:06 Speaker 02: we combine them together, or is

00:57:07 Speaker 02: it's going to be a monthly

00:57:09 Speaker 02: thing? There that there'll be an

00:57:10 Speaker 02: exchange of CP rail land in

00:57:12 Speaker 02: Dundalk for Southgate, or is there

00:57:15 Speaker 02: a bit of a bulk buying

00:57:16 Speaker 02: here so that we don't

00:57:19 Speaker 02: need a bylaw every week or

00:57:20 Speaker 02: month to transfer land? just it's

00:57:22 Speaker 02: curious that yeah we're doing a

00:57:26 Speaker 02: bylaw to transfer lands and then

00:57:28 Speaker 02: we're going to talk about another

00:57:29 Speaker 02: bylaw to transfer another little bit

00:57:30 Speaker 02: of land. Wow, I guess that's

00:57:33 Speaker 02: government duplicity, isn't it? Okay, well

00:57:34 Speaker 30: they usually cut me off. Thank

00:57:35 Speaker 30: you. or a matter of looking

00:57:38 Speaker 30: after details and making sure that

00:57:40 Speaker 30: we're dotting all of our eyes

00:57:42 Speaker 30: and crossing all of our t's.

00:57:44 Speaker 30: So I do know that Director

00:57:47 Speaker 30: Taylor would like to speak, but

00:57:49 Speaker 30: perhaps okay. So we're going to

00:57:50 Speaker 30: begin with with the content answer,

00:57:54 Speaker 30: and then I'll look to the

00:57:56 Speaker 30: clerk for any procedural clarification. Director

00:57:58 Speaker 30: Taylor, good morning. Early, good morning

00:58:00 Speaker 30: to you, because we're not we're

00:58:02 Speaker 30: not just before lunch. Thank you,

00:58:04 Speaker 30: thank you, Madam Warden, and good

00:58:06 Speaker 30: morning to you and members of

00:58:08 Speaker 30: County Council and those tuning in.

00:58:09 Speaker 30: thank you for the the comments,

00:58:10 Speaker 30: Councillor Eccles. This one is a

00:58:12 Speaker 30: little confusing because we have had

00:58:15 Speaker 30: a bunch of changes in Southgate.

00:58:16 Speaker 30: Council may recall that there was

00:58:18 Speaker 30: a report back in February that

00:58:20 Speaker 30: looked at four crossings of the

00:58:22 Speaker 30: CP Rail Trail: two up up

00:58:23 Speaker 30: in in sort of the north

00:58:25 Speaker 30: end of Dundalk, close to the

00:58:27 Speaker 30: new school site, and and two

00:58:28 Speaker 30: along the the proposed Eco Parkway

00:58:30 Speaker 30: road expansion. In that regard, the

00:58:32 Speaker 30: report that came to committee the

00:58:36 Speaker 30: whole. three weeks ago was essentially

00:58:39 Speaker 30: to add on to those two

00:58:41 Speaker 30: southerly crossings and also include a

00:58:46 Speaker 30: water main easement. So that's what's

00:58:49 Speaker 30: before you today on the council

00:58:50 Speaker 30: agenda. But you're quite right; there

00:58:52 Speaker 26: is a separate report on the

00:58:56 Speaker 26: committee the whole agenda later today

00:58:58 Speaker 26: dealing with a potential land swap,

00:58:59 Speaker 26: if we can call it that,

00:59:01 Speaker 26: in in sort of the the

00:59:04 Speaker 26: heart of Dundalk, with respect to

00:59:05 Speaker 07: some lands potentially going from the

00:59:09 Speaker 07: county to the the township and

00:59:12 Speaker 07: vice versa. So it is just

00:59:14 Speaker 07: sort of a coincidence of timing.

00:59:16 Speaker 07: that all this came together at

00:59:17 Speaker 07: the same time, but they are

00:59:20 Speaker 07: sort of two separate and distinct

00:59:25 Speaker 07: matters, and and the the individual

00:59:28 Speaker 07: agreements associated with with both have

00:59:29 Speaker 26: have different requirements that we've worked

00:59:31 Speaker 26: closely with township staff and our

00:59:35 Speaker 26: own legal services staff. So, okay,

00:59:37 Speaker 26: thank you, and Madam Clerk. Okay,

00:59:42 Speaker 26: so she has no nothing further

00:59:43 Speaker 26: to add to that. Any further

00:59:45 Speaker 26: discussion, Councillor Greg? if I could,

00:59:46 Speaker 26: I'd just like to compliment staff

00:59:47 Speaker 26: on what is a very good

00:59:51 Speaker 26: outcome on the new nuisance bylaw

00:59:52 Speaker 31: for beavers and coyotes. I think

00:59:54 Speaker 31: he did an excellent job consulting

00:59:56 Speaker 31: across broad sectors of the community

00:59:58 Speaker 31: and Ministry of Natural Resources and

01:00:00 Speaker 31: other various interested parties and landed

01:00:02 Speaker 31: today with the passage of what

01:00:03 Speaker 31: is a very good bylaw for

01:00:06 Speaker 31: for the county to adopt and

01:00:07 Speaker 31: try moving forward. Thank. you. Anything

01:00:09 Speaker 31: further? Okay, so this is a

01:00:11 Speaker 31: vote on the bylaws. All those

01:00:12 Speaker 31: in favour, and that motion is

9 News and Celebrations

Council members announced upcoming community events including a canvas artwork reveal at Gray Roots Museum on August 26 and the 51st annual Summerfolk Music and Craft Festival at Castle Beach this weekend. A special service will honour George Stevenson and the dedication of World War II memorial windows at Christ Church Anglican on August 15, featuring a recovered Hurricane Hawker propeller. The Markdale Fall Fair begins August 29 at the Markdale Arena, followed by the Hopeville Kite Festival on August 29 and 30 south of Gray Road Nine.

01:00:14 Speaker 31: carried. News and celebrations. Are we

01:00:15 Speaker 31: beginning with anything from staff? One.

01:00:16 Speaker 31: Yep. I think Director Myers, why

01:00:17 Speaker 31: don't you just shine a little

01:00:18 Speaker 31: light on one of the activities

01:00:20 Speaker 31: that we have coming up at

01:00:21 Speaker 31: Gray Roots before we open it

01:00:23 Speaker 31: to the council floor? Excellent. Thank

01:00:24 Speaker 31: you, Orin. Good morning. Excellent, thank

01:00:28 Speaker 31: you, and good morning, County Council.

01:00:29 Speaker 21: On your desks, you have an

01:00:31 Speaker 21: invitation to the upcoming community canvas

01:00:32 Speaker 21: artwork reveal. That'll be hosted in

01:00:35 Speaker 21: about two weeks on Wednesday, August

01:00:36 Speaker 21: 26, from two to three p.m.

01:00:38 Speaker 21: It's at Gray Roots Museum and

01:00:40 Speaker 21: Archives. We have had the real

01:00:41 Speaker 21: pleasure of working with Roger Munkin

01:00:43 Speaker 21: on a Roger Munkin experience for

01:00:45 Speaker 21: this one, as well as two

01:00:46 Speaker 21: local artists. So we've been building

01:00:49 Speaker 21: a community canvas with members of

01:00:54 Speaker 21: the public coming to write on

01:00:56 Speaker 32: it and to leave messages as

01:00:58 Speaker 32: well. So there's still a little

01:01:01 Speaker 32: bit of time to do that

01:01:04 Speaker 32: if anyone is interested. But we

01:01:05 Speaker 32: will formally. unveil it on August

01:01:09 Speaker 32: 26, and we would love to

01:01:11 Speaker 32: see you there if you're available.

01:01:12 Speaker 32: Thanks. Okay, thank you. Always something

01:01:15 Speaker 32: going on at Gray Roots. For

01:01:17 Speaker 32: the first time, my granddaughter and

01:01:21 Speaker 32: I were able to ride the

01:01:24 Speaker 32: special train, so we're we were

01:01:26 Speaker 32: very delighted to be there for

01:01:27 Speaker 32: that special event. Always members of

01:01:32 Speaker 32: the public check what's happening because

01:01:36 Speaker 32: there's always something to do for

01:01:38 Speaker 32: all ages at Gray Roots. Okay,

01:01:40 Speaker 33: so with that, then I'll open

01:01:41 Speaker 33: it up to the council floor.

01:01:42 Speaker 33: We'll begin with alternate. councillor Capkay.

01:01:44 Speaker 33: Good morning, Council, and thank you,

01:01:47 Speaker 33: Warden, for the opportunity to extend

01:01:49 Speaker 33: a warm welcome to those attending

01:01:52 Speaker 33: the 51st annual Summerfolk Music and

01:01:54 Speaker 33: Craft Festival, taking place at Castle

01:01:55 Speaker 33: Beach at Naywash Park and Owen

01:01:58 Speaker 33: Sound on this weekend. Artisans from

01:02:00 Speaker 33: all over will showcase their talents.

01:02:02 Speaker 33: There will be lots of musical

01:02:03 Speaker 33: entertainment, including the Arrogant Worms and

01:02:05 Speaker 33: our own Tanglefoot, and there's a

01:02:07 Speaker 33: large children's area. Something for everyone

01:02:08 Speaker 33: of all ages. I invite you

01:02:11 Speaker 33: to attend Summerfolk this weekend in

01:02:13 Speaker 33: Old Sound, and hopefully it doesn't

01:02:15 Speaker 33: rain. Okay, thank you, and we'll

01:02:17 Speaker 33: go to Councillor Keaveny. Thank you,

01:02:20 Speaker 33: Madam Warden, and good morning, everyone.

01:02:23 Speaker 33: And just like there's always something

01:02:25 Speaker 33: going on at Gray Roots, there's

01:02:28 Speaker 33: always something going on in Meadford.

01:02:31 Speaker 33: So this Saturday, August the fifteenth,

01:02:32 Speaker 33: there's a very special event at

01:02:34 Speaker 33: Christ Church Anglican. It's the 80th

01:02:35 Speaker 33: anniversary of the dedication of the

01:02:37 Speaker 33: World War II memorial windows, and

01:02:39 Speaker 33: this is a really special story

01:02:40 Speaker 33: where Bishop Harold Yapleyard went across

01:02:43 Speaker 33: to Europe and collected glass from

01:02:45 Speaker 33: bombed churches and brought it back

01:02:47 Speaker 33: to create the windows at the

01:02:49 Speaker 33: Anglican Church, and it's quite a

01:02:51 Speaker 33: tourist attraction. As well, that day

01:02:53 Speaker 33: there will be a special service

01:02:54 Speaker 33: in memory of George Stevenson, who

01:02:56 Speaker 33: was the first Anglican to go

01:02:58 Speaker 33: across to World War. Cross to

01:02:59 Speaker 33: World War Two and be killed.

01:03:01 Speaker 33: So, the story is that his

01:03:06 Speaker 33: nephew actually found at a pub

01:03:09 Speaker 33: in Scotland, outside the door, a

01:03:11 Speaker 33: propeller from the plane that his

01:03:12 Speaker 34: uncle actually flew, and that was

01:03:14 Speaker 34: a Hurricane Hawker, and the propeller

01:03:15 Speaker 34: was being used as an umbrella

01:03:17 Speaker 34: stand. So now that has been

01:03:20 Speaker 34: brought back to the church, and

01:03:23 Speaker 34: there will be a dedication for

01:03:24 Speaker 34: that on Saturday, and they will

01:03:25 Speaker 34: also be celebrating the hundredth anniversary

01:03:27 Speaker 34: of the Branch Thirty Two. Of

01:03:28 Speaker 34: the Branch 32 Legion in Mifflin,

01:03:30 Speaker 34: so there will be a dinner

01:03:36 Speaker 34: as well in the evening, as

01:03:43 Speaker 34: a ceremony at the cenotaph Saturday

01:03:45 Speaker 35: morning in honour of the Legion's

01:03:47 Speaker 16: 100th anniversary. So it's a big

01:03:52 Speaker 16: day in Mifflin, and those of

01:03:55 Speaker 16: us travelling to Amol on Saturday

01:03:57 Speaker 16: are sorry to miss it. But

01:03:59 Speaker 16: in any event, that will be

01:04:01 Speaker 16: happening. Thank you. Thank you. Anything

01:04:03 Speaker 16: else? We'll go to Councillor Nielsen.

01:04:06 Speaker 16: Thank you very much, Ward Matrosov.

01:04:08 Speaker 16: While Owen Sound is already thinking

01:04:12 Speaker 16: about summer folk, Grey Highlands is

01:04:14 Speaker 16: already starting to plan our first

01:04:16 Speaker 16: of three fall fairs. The first

01:04:18 Speaker 16: fall fair will be happening August

01:04:21 Speaker 16: 29th at the Markdale Arena. The

01:04:24 Speaker 16: Markdale Arena does have portions that

01:04:26 Speaker 16: are open, so it's going to

01:04:31 Speaker 16: be indoors and outdoors. But all

01:04:33 Speaker 16: are welcome as always as we

01:04:36 Speaker 36: start the fall fair season. Thank

01:04:37 Speaker 36: you very much. Hey, thank you.

01:04:39 Speaker 36: Okay, anything else? All right. Oh,

01:04:41 Speaker 26: Councillor Debrine. Thank you, and through

01:04:43 Speaker 26: you. And while the Markdale Fall

01:04:46 Speaker 26: Fair is on August twenty ninth,

01:04:52 Speaker 26: thirtieth, the Hopeville Kite Festival is

01:05:01 Speaker 26: also on August twenty ninth and

01:05:02 Speaker 26: thirtieth. It will be from twelve

01:05:03 Speaker 26: till five both days, and it

01:05:05 Speaker 26: is located this year just south

01:05:07 Speaker 26: of Gray Road Nine on Southgate

01:05:09 Speaker 26: Road Fifteen. So it is a

01:05:10 Speaker 26: free entry event. free will donation

01:05:13 Speaker 26: to to support our local food

01:05:15 Speaker 26: bank, but it is we're in

01:05:16 Speaker 26: for a treat. The professional flyers

01:05:17 Speaker 26: are coming in from all over,

01:05:32 Speaker 26: including Ohio, Belize, Quebec, just to

01:05:33 Speaker 03: name a few. So hope to

01:05:36 Speaker 02: see some people out and enjoy

01:05:38 Speaker 02: some quiet time. Okay, thank you

01:05:39 Speaker 02: very much. Lots to do. All

01:05:42 Speaker 02: right. So with that, then we

01:05:43 Speaker 02: will look for a. motion to

01:05:46 Speaker 02: adjourn. Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded

01:05:49 Speaker 02: by the Deputy Warden. Any discussion?

01:05:51 Speaker 02: All those in favour? And the

01:05:52 Speaker 02: council portion is adjourned. And let

01:05:55 Speaker 02: me just well, the technology is

01:05:57 Speaker 02: trading over. Okay, so we are

01:06:01 Speaker 02: going to be having our lunch

01:06:02 Speaker 02: at twelve fifteen. I would like

01:06:04 Speaker 02: us to proceed in. Like us

01:06:05 Speaker 02: to proceed into committee. The whole

01:06:09 Speaker 37: to identify the items that that

01:06:13 Speaker 37: may be pulled from the consent

01:06:14 Speaker 37: agenda, so staff have time have

01:06:18 Speaker 37: time to prepare to come forward.

01:06:22 Speaker 37: So once we get to that

01:06:32 Speaker 37: portion of committee, the whole, we'll

01:06:33 Speaker 37: call a break. Okay. So I'd

01:06:36 Speaker 37: like to call to order this

01:06:38 Speaker 26: committee. The whole. of August thirteenth,

01:06:40 Speaker 26: twenty twenty-six. At this point in

01:06:42 Speaker 26: time, I'll put out a call

01:06:43 Speaker 26: if there are any declarations of

01:06:44 Speaker 26: interest. Seeing no hands raised, we'll

01:06:46 Speaker 26: move on. Business arising from minutes,

01:06:49 Speaker 26: we have healthy discussion on minutes.

01:06:51 Speaker 26: Delegations, we do not have any

01:06:52 Speaker 26: today, and so we'll go to

01:06:54 Speaker 26: item five: determination of items requiring

01:06:57 Speaker 26: separate discussion on the consent agenda

01:06:59 Speaker 26: listed in six. We have seven

01:07:01 Speaker 26: different items listed, so I'll ask

01:07:05 Speaker 26: if you. could identify any items

01:07:07 Speaker 26: you wish to have a separate

01:07:09 Speaker 26: discussion for. Councillor Gray, 6C, just

01:07:11 Speaker 26: for point of a question. Thanks.

01:07:12 Speaker 26: So, question for 6C, so we'll

01:07:14 Speaker 26: pull that one separately. Anything else,

01:07:15 Speaker 26: Councillor McLean? Thank you, Madam Warden.

01:19:34 Speaker 26: Yes, 6F. Okay, 6F. Anything else?

01:19:35 Speaker 26: Okay, I'm not seeing any further

01:19:53 Speaker 26: hands. Therefore, we'll just tidy up

01:19:54 Speaker 26: then the consent agenda. It's recommended

01:19:56 Speaker 26: that the following consent agenda items

01:19:58 Speaker 26: be received, and that staff be

01:20:01 Speaker 26: authorised to take actions necessary to

01:20:03 Speaker 26: give effect to the recommendations in

01:20:04 Speaker 26: the staff reports, and that the

01:20:06 Speaker 26: correspondence be supported or received

01:20:09 Speaker 26: for information as recommended in the

01:20:11 Speaker 26: consent agenda. It will be all

01:20:13 Speaker 26: items less item 6C as in

01:20:16 Speaker 26: cat and F as in frog.

01:20:17 Speaker 26: May I ask for mover to

01:20:20 Speaker 26: seconder? Move. Moved by Councillor Eccles,

01:20:21 Speaker 26: seconded by Councillor Mackie. Any discussion?

01:20:23 Speaker 26: All those in favour? And that

01:20:25 Speaker 26: motion is carried. Thank you. So

01:20:26 Speaker 26: let's take a break now until

01:20:26 Speaker 26: 11:10, and then we'll carry on

01:20:29 Speaker 26: with the remainder of our agenda

01:20:31 Speaker 26: in the morning and see where

01:20:32 Speaker 26: we are by 12:15. Could I

01:20:37 Speaker 26: please invite all of our committee,

01:20:39 Speaker 26: the whole members, back to the

01:20:42 Speaker 26: horseshoe? Okay, so we are reconvening

01:20:46 Speaker 38: after our break, and we are

01:20:49 Speaker 38: at item seven a, and this

01:20:52 Speaker 38: is with regards to

01:20:54 Speaker 38: community services committee minutes. And in

01:20:56 Speaker 38: a moment, we'll call up Director

01:20:58 Speaker 38: Shaw to speak to that.

01:21:01 Speaker 38: So it's recommended that the community

01:21:04 Speaker 38: services committee minutes dated August six,

01:21:06 Speaker 38: twenty twenty six, be adopted as

01:21:07 Speaker 38: presented, and that the following resolutions

01:21:11 Speaker 38: contained therein be endorsed. There are

01:21:13 Speaker 38: a number of them that have

01:21:14 Speaker 38: been. outlined and highlighted here in

01:21:16 Speaker 38: the circulated agenda that's been made

01:21:18 Speaker 38: public and circulated to all committee,

01:21:20 Speaker 38: the whole members. So at this

01:21:22 Speaker 38: point in time, I will look

01:21:25 Speaker 38: for a mover and a seconder.

01:21:26 Speaker 38: Got a move by Councillor Hutchison,

01:21:32 Speaker 38: second by Councillor Dovring. So it's

01:21:33 Speaker 38: now on the floor for discussion.

01:21:34 Speaker 38: Welcome, Director Shaw. Thank you, Madam

01:21:36 Speaker 38: Warden, and good morning, County Council.

01:21:39 Speaker 38: Starting off with the first recommendation,

01:21:41 Speaker 38: it is our community's. Our community

01:21:42 Speaker 38: services systems planning and compliance analyst

01:21:44 Speaker 38: position. The Ministry of Education has

01:21:48 Speaker 38: a provincially mandated modernization initiatives over

01:21:50 Speaker 38: the next five years. They're looking

01:21:54 Speaker 38: at increasing requirements for IT modernization,

01:21:57 Speaker 38: data management, compliance monitoring, and performance

01:21:59 Speaker 38: measures. This is actually a really

01:22:02 Speaker 38: good news story. We do not

01:22:03 Speaker 38: have a centralized waitlist for childcare

01:22:06 Speaker 38: in anywhere in the province, and

01:22:09 Speaker 38: so right now, majority of people

01:22:11 Speaker 38: that are looking for childcare would

01:22:11 Speaker 38: have to put an application

01:22:14 Speaker 38: into all of the existing childcare

01:22:17 Speaker 38: centres out there, rather than having

01:22:20 Speaker 38: one centralized area to do it.

01:22:21 Speaker 38: There are many other options when

01:22:23 Speaker 38: it comes to early on programmemes.

01:22:25 Speaker 38: Standardizing, taking, scanning people in and

01:22:31 Speaker 38: out of the programmemes. So there's

01:22:31 Speaker 38: a lot of that other security

01:22:34 Speaker 38: and safety aspects of it. The

01:22:37 Speaker 38: province is looking at this taking

01:22:39 Speaker 38: about three to five years, and

01:22:41 Speaker 38: there are five different phases. The

01:22:43 Speaker 38: first phase is starting this September

01:22:45 Speaker 38: and will continue on until September

01:22:48 Speaker 38: of 2027. And that is again

01:22:50 Speaker 38: modernizing our early on. We are

01:22:52 Speaker 38: looking at a position in order

01:22:54 Speaker 38: to do this. The position itself

01:22:56 Speaker 38: is proposed to to also expand

01:22:57 Speaker 38: to all of our services and

01:22:59 Speaker 38: community services. So, for instance, in

01:23:04 Speaker 38: 2027, we're going to have a

01:23:05 Speaker 38: review under the MMNH. So, I'm

01:23:06 Speaker 38: sure there's going to be modernization

01:23:09 Speaker 38: recommendations coming from that, and also

01:23:11 Speaker 38: our housing and homelessness plan. So

01:23:14 Speaker 38: developing and dashboards and having a

01:23:18 Speaker 38: way of us to report on

01:23:22 Speaker 38: a number of our initiatives. Along

01:23:24 Speaker 38: with this comes increased data collection

01:23:26 Speaker 38: from the province, and as part

01:23:27 Speaker 38: of the Sea Well programme, we

01:23:29 Speaker 38: are now asking our childcare centres

01:23:31 Speaker 38: to put together business plans and

01:23:32 Speaker 38: do a lot of financial work

01:23:34 Speaker 38: and. auditing that didn't happen in

01:23:36 Speaker 38: the past, and this position will

01:23:38 Speaker 38: also help some of our smaller

01:23:38 Speaker 38: smaller centres in order to meet

01:23:40 Speaker 38: those regulatory requirements. Now from from

01:23:46 Speaker 38: the province, the funding we did

01:23:48 Speaker 38: receive funding from the Ministry of

01:23:51 Speaker 39: Education in order to assist with

01:23:52 Speaker 39: that. We received forty six thousand

01:23:54 Speaker 39: dollars for two thousand and twenty

01:23:55 Speaker 39: six, but that is prorated. There

01:23:59 Speaker 39: will be a different amount coming

01:24:00 Speaker 39: for twenty twenty seven, and we

01:24:03 Speaker 39: also received some additional funding.

01:24:05 Speaker 39: Some additional funds and early

01:24:09 Speaker 39: on for next year, also as

01:24:13 Speaker 38: administrative funds. The position itself will

01:24:15 Speaker 38: be looking at salary, benefits, supplies,

01:24:18 Speaker 38: materials, travel, a computer, cell phone,

01:24:19 Speaker 38: all of that around the hundred

01:24:22 Speaker 38: and fifty thousand dollars. So there

01:24:25 Speaker 38: are no levy dollars at this

01:24:28 Speaker 38: point going into it.

01:24:31 Speaker 38: And if at some time in

01:24:33 Speaker 38: the next five years it is

01:24:35 Speaker 38: required, we do have mitigation funds

01:24:36 Speaker 38: that we could use for that.

01:24:38 Speaker 38: And I'm happy to. answer questions

01:24:40 Speaker 38: about that. Or would you like

01:24:42 Speaker 38: me to continue with them all,

01:24:43 Speaker 38: Madam Warden? Let me see. Why

01:24:45 Speaker 38: don't we let's try to contain

01:24:47 Speaker 38: our discussion. So let's go ahead

01:24:51 Speaker 38: and just present everything, and we'll

01:24:53 Speaker 38: just we'll zero back to what

01:24:56 Speaker 38: it is people would like to

01:24:57 Speaker 38: talk to you. Thank you. Thank

01:24:59 Speaker 38: you. So the next one on

01:25:02 Speaker 38: the list is our Canada Ontario

01:25:05 Speaker 38: Community Housing Initiatives in Ontario. priorities,

01:25:06 Speaker 38: housing initiatives, investment plans. These are

01:25:08 Speaker 38: 100% provincial funded. We did receive

01:25:10 Speaker 38: our allocation for this year. Normally,

01:25:12 Speaker 38: we do have it before budget,

01:25:14 Speaker 38: but this year and last year,

01:25:16 Speaker 38: we did not. These funds are

01:25:19 Speaker 38: to protect the long-term viability of

01:25:21 Speaker 38: community housing by supporting ongoing repairs,

01:25:23 Speaker 38: supporting end-of-operating agreements, and expanding the

01:25:25 Speaker 38: stock. We normally work. with our

01:25:27 Speaker 38: nonprofits with these funds too, in

01:25:29 Speaker 38: order to provide any capital repair

01:25:31 Speaker 38: funds that might be available to

01:25:32 Speaker 38: them. As part of the national

01:25:35 Speaker 38: housing strategy, we also have a

01:25:39 Speaker 38: requirement of fifteen new units in

01:25:41 Speaker 38: order to meet the funding requirements

01:25:43 Speaker 38: for the province. We are proposing

01:25:47 Speaker 38: to keep our rent supplement programme

01:25:49 Speaker 38: going. Right now, we have forty-five

01:25:51 Speaker 38: rent supplements that we provide, and

01:25:54 Speaker 38: we're going to add two new

01:25:57 Speaker 38: rent or twelve new rent supplements

01:25:58 Speaker 38: as a total. towards that fifteen,

01:26:00 Speaker 38: we're looking at five hundred thousand

01:26:02 Speaker 38: dollars towards our capital build in

01:26:04 Speaker 38: Dundalk, and that would provide for

01:26:10 Speaker 38: three new units. And of course,

01:26:12 Speaker 38: our community housing repairs funds at

01:26:14 Speaker 38: about three hundred and thirteen, and

01:26:16 Speaker 38: those would go towards funding needs

01:26:17 Speaker 38: in ourselves, emergency funding needs, or

01:26:18 Speaker 38: funding needs for our nonprofits. Part

01:26:20 Speaker 38: of our priority housing would be

01:26:23 Speaker 38: our rental supplements again, and we

01:26:25 Speaker 38: also put a ten percent allocation

01:26:27 Speaker 38: to be used towards support services.

01:26:29 Speaker 38: ten percent is the highest that

01:26:31 Speaker 38: we can go according to that

01:26:34 Speaker 38: fund. Our next item is Garifraxa

01:26:35 Speaker 38: Nonprofit Homes. These are one of

01:26:36 Speaker 38: our nine nonprofits that we support.

01:26:40 Speaker 38: So through the Housing Services Act,

01:26:41 Speaker 38: we have a number of not-for-profits

01:26:42 Speaker 38: that the county supports, and these

01:26:44 Speaker 38: are one of them. They had

01:26:45 Speaker 38: a sinkhole in their parking lot

01:26:47 Speaker 21: as part of all that rain

01:26:49 Speaker 21: we had back in April and.

01:26:54 Speaker 21: there were needs repair needs for

01:26:59 Speaker 21: the retaining wall and also for

01:27:03 Speaker 21: the driveway itself. We the repairs

01:27:04 Speaker 21: are costing two hundred and seventy-five

01:27:08 Speaker 21: thousand dollars. They do have some

01:27:13 Speaker 21: funds available, but they also have

01:27:14 Speaker 27: other capital needs that are coming

01:27:17 Speaker 27: up. So they approached the county

01:27:20 Speaker 27: to see if we could provide

01:27:24 Speaker 27: any extra any funding towards it.

01:27:27 Speaker 27: We we proposed one hundred and

01:27:28 Speaker 27: twenty-five thousand dollars. We have seventy-five

01:27:32 Speaker 27: thousand dollars that we're going to.

01:27:37 Speaker 27: use from our nonprofit housing general

01:27:39 Speaker 27: reserve and fifty thousand dollars from

01:27:40 Speaker 27: the Cochi initiatives that I just

01:27:43 Speaker 27: talked about. And I'm happy to

01:27:45 Speaker 27: answer any questions. Okay, thank you.

01:27:47 Speaker 40: So I'll put it out. If

01:27:49 Speaker 40: there are any questions from members

01:27:50 Speaker 40: of the committee, the whole, perhaps

01:27:52 Speaker 40: you can refer to if it's

01:27:55 Speaker 40: item one, two, or three to

01:27:56 Speaker 40: help clarify, and then we'll look

01:27:59 Speaker 40: into that. Any questions? Okay, we'll

01:28:01 Speaker 40: begin with Councillor Apples. And through

01:28:03 Speaker 40: you, Madam Warden, and probably to

01:28:06 Speaker 40: Terad, has really nothing to do

01:28:08 Speaker 40: with your report whatsoever, Emery. It

01:28:10 Speaker 40: has to do with just procedural.

01:28:11 Speaker 40: I noticed at the end of

01:28:13 Speaker 40: the meeting, the meeting was adjourned

01:28:18 Speaker 40: by Councillor DeBree, made the motion,

01:28:22 Speaker 40: and the chair seconded the motion.

01:28:26 Speaker 40: Procedurally, can the chair move and

01:28:28 Speaker 40: second? The chair move in second

01:28:30 Speaker 34: motions, and that's why I'm looking

01:28:32 Speaker 34: towards Tara and Marie, not you.

01:28:38 Speaker 34: Okay, I'll look to Madam Clerk.

01:28:43 Speaker 34: Thank you, and through you, Madam

01:28:44 Speaker 34: Morgan. I do not know the

01:28:46 Speaker 21: answer to that offhand. It's certainly

01:28:49 Speaker 41: something that I can look into.

01:28:51 Speaker 41: I did glance our procedural bylaw,

01:28:55 Speaker 41: and it's it doesn't speak to

01:28:56 Speaker 41: that. So I think the answer

01:29:04 Speaker 41: is probably somewhere in Roberts' Rules

01:29:05 Speaker 41: of Order. I know. that our

01:29:07 Speaker 42: procedure bylaw, though it doesn't speak

01:29:08 Speaker 42: to it, some municipalities, the chair,

01:29:11 Speaker 42: I believe, their procedure bylaw allows

01:29:13 Speaker 42: for the chair to adjourn meetings,

01:29:15 Speaker 21: but it is unclear to me

01:29:17 Speaker 21: what proper protocol would be in

01:29:19 Speaker 21: our in our circumstances. So I

01:29:20 Speaker 21: can certainly look into that. I

01:29:21 Speaker 21: think we we would have fun

01:29:24 Speaker 21: looking into that for you. Okay,

01:29:27 Speaker 21: thank you, Councillor Nielsen. Thank you

01:29:31 Speaker 21: for. Thank you very much, Ward

01:29:34 Speaker 21: Mustafa, to Councillor Eccles. If my

01:29:39 Speaker 21: motion to adjourn was incorrect, I

01:29:41 Speaker 21: apologize for the world record of

01:29:42 Speaker 21: the longest community services committee, as

01:29:43 Speaker 21: it is still currently running. Thank

01:29:45 Speaker 21: you. Anything else, Councillor McQueen? Just

01:29:46 Speaker 21: to follow up to the question,

01:29:50 Speaker 21: I know with procedure, I know

01:29:52 Speaker 21: with Grey Highlands, we allow the

01:29:53 Speaker 21: chair to second, but. won't allow

01:29:55 Speaker 43: the chair to move. So you

01:29:57 Speaker 43: may be the meeting may be

01:29:59 Speaker 43: over with. Thank you. Okay, so

01:30:01 Speaker 43: if there's no further discussion or

01:30:20 Speaker 43: questions for Director Shaw, I'll call

01:30:22 Speaker 43: the question. Then all those in

01:30:24 Speaker 44: favour. That motion is carried. Thank

01:30:29 Speaker 43: you very much, Director Shaw. Okay,

01:30:35 Speaker 43: so we're going to move on

01:30:36 Speaker 43: now to item seven B, and

01:30:38 Speaker 43: in fact, we're going to in.

01:30:40 Speaker 43: 7B, C, and D, we're going

01:30:41 Speaker 43: to see a lot of Director

01:30:43 Speaker 43: McNabb. So let's get started on

01:30:45 Speaker 43: on this part here. The first

01:30:46 Speaker 43: one is item 7B. It's recommended

01:30:49 Speaker 43: that the 2027 response time performance

01:30:53 Speaker 43: plan, as outlined in the report

01:30:56 Speaker 43: PSRCW0426, be approved and submitted to

01:30:58 Speaker 43: the Ministry of Health. May I

01:31:01 Speaker 43: ask for a mover and a

01:31:04 Speaker 43: second? Moved by Councillor Nielsen, seconded

01:31:06 Speaker 43: by Councillor Eccles. It's now on

01:31:09 Speaker 43: the floor for discussion. Welcome. Director

01:31:10 Speaker 43: McCloud. Good morning, Warden County Council.

01:31:14 Speaker 43: I did bring a friend, and

01:31:16 Speaker 43: I'll introduce Jessica when she comes

01:31:18 Speaker 43: up here. But, anyways, knowing that

01:31:19 Speaker 43: I have three reports, so I'll

01:31:21 Speaker 43: try to keep them short. That

01:31:22 Speaker 43: I might do before lunch. So.

01:31:25 Speaker 43: Okay, so each year we have

01:31:27 Speaker 43: to develop a response time plan

01:31:31 Speaker 43: for the upcoming year, and I

01:31:33 Speaker 43: think we sorry. A response time.

01:31:34 Speaker 43: Oh, each year we have to

01:31:37 Speaker 43: develop a response time performance plan

01:31:40 Speaker 43: prior to October first, and then

01:31:42 Speaker 43: submit it to the ministry prior

01:31:44 Speaker 43: to the end of October. This

01:31:46 Speaker 43: plan is to cover the twenty

01:31:48 Speaker 43: twenty seven year. To cover the

01:31:50 Speaker 43: 2027 year, and in March of

01:31:52 Speaker 43: next year we'll report on the

01:31:54 Speaker 43: response times from 2026. So this

01:31:56 Speaker 43: chart it lays out our response

01:31:58 Speaker 43: time plan. It also gives you

01:32:00 Speaker 43: what the 2025 response time performance

01:32:02 Speaker 43: was, and then also up till

01:32:04 Speaker 43: June 2026 or June 30th, 2026,

01:32:06 Speaker 43: and then also our our five-year

01:32:09 Speaker 43: average. The response times that we

01:32:12 Speaker 43: have were developed back in 2012

01:32:15 Speaker 43: when 12, when this new response

01:32:16 Speaker 43: time framework was first implemented, and

01:32:18 Speaker 43: the times were took from how

01:32:23 Speaker 43: we were achieving goals at that

01:32:25 Speaker 43: point. We haven't changed the response

01:32:26 Speaker 43: times other than in 2017. We

01:32:28 Speaker 43: improved upon the CTS1 response time

01:32:30 Speaker 43: from 50% to 60%, and we

01:32:32 Speaker 43: also moved the CTS3, 4, and

01:32:33 Speaker 43: 5 from 30 minutes down to

01:32:37 Speaker 43: 20 minutes. So we've improved upon

01:32:39 Speaker 43: those response times. Sudden cardiac arrest

01:32:42 Speaker 43: is six minutes or less, and

01:32:44 Speaker 43: we as a miss. And we,

01:32:46 Speaker 43: as a municipality, can set the

01:32:49 Speaker 43: percentage. C task one is set

01:32:51 Speaker 43: at eight minutes, and we, as

01:32:52 Speaker 43: municipality, can set the percentage of

01:32:53 Speaker 43: how often we are able to

01:32:55 Speaker 43: achieve that goal. C task two,

01:32:56 Speaker 43: three, four, and five, the municipality

01:32:58 Speaker 43: can set the response time as

01:32:59 Speaker 43: well as the percentage. So, if

01:33:00 Speaker 43: you can see our targets, it's

01:33:02 Speaker 43: a forty percent of the time

01:33:03 Speaker 43: for cardiac arrest in six minutes

01:33:04 Speaker 43: or less. For C task one,

01:33:05 Speaker 43: it's eight minutes, sixty percent. 60%,

01:33:06 Speaker 43: and then C test two is

01:33:07 Speaker 43: 15 minutes at 90%, and then

01:33:09 Speaker 43: C test three, four, and five

01:33:10 Speaker 43: are all at 90% for 20

01:33:13 Speaker 43: minutes. Just to give you an

01:33:14 Speaker 43: idea about also how we look

01:33:17 Speaker 43: at calls, we also look at

01:33:18 Speaker 43: just all call floors together as

01:33:20 Speaker 43: opposed to breaking up by C

01:33:22 Speaker 43: test, and you can see we've

01:33:23 Speaker 43: been in that 15-minute range for

01:33:25 Speaker 43: quite some time. 15, 32, and

01:33:26 Speaker 43: in 2025 and Two in in

01:33:27 Speaker 43: 2025 and 1540 this year, and

01:33:29 Speaker 43: this this has been around 15

01:33:30 Speaker 43: minutes since back almost back to

01:33:32 Speaker 43: 1996 when the last response time

01:33:37 Speaker 43: standard was. We measure by a

01:33:38 Speaker 43: 90th percentile because that gives us

01:33:41 Speaker 43: under normal usage what time you

01:33:44 Speaker 43: can expect the ambulance to get

01:33:45 Speaker 43: to the scene nine times out

01:33:51 Speaker 43: of ten in the county, and

01:33:53 Speaker 43: that's from the time the pager

01:33:55 Speaker 43: goes off until the time we

01:33:57 Speaker 43: arrive at the scene. So if

01:34:00 Speaker 43: you look at that, if you

01:34:01 Speaker 43: build in a shoot time of

01:34:02 Speaker 43: when the pager goes off in

01:34:04 Speaker 43: the base, it takes you a

01:34:05 Speaker 43: minute and a half to get

01:34:06 Speaker 43: in the truck and. figure out

01:34:07 Speaker 43: where you're going. Nine times out

01:34:09 Speaker 43: of ten, in gray so far

01:34:11 Speaker 43: this year, we're at the scene

01:34:13 Speaker 43: 15 minutes and 40 seconds. Nine

01:34:15 Speaker 43: times out of ten, we also

01:34:16 Speaker 43: look at average response times. Doesn't

01:34:19 Speaker 43: really tell you a lot, like

01:34:21 Speaker 43: as far as like because there's

01:34:25 Speaker 43: lots of two minute response times

01:34:27 Speaker 43: and maybe 28 minute response times,

01:34:29 Speaker 43: but it's just a good gauge

01:34:31 Speaker 43: that we keep an eye on

01:34:33 Speaker 43: average to see if that's going

01:34:34 Speaker 43: up or down, and it's typically

01:34:36 Speaker 43: in this seven minute range. So.

01:34:37 Speaker 43: if approved, this will be what

01:34:38 Speaker 43: will be submitted to the ministry

01:34:43 Speaker 43: this year. Again, everything will remain

01:34:46 Speaker 43: the same, but that'll be submitted

01:34:48 Speaker 43: in, and then it'll be published

01:34:51 Speaker 43: for for people to see. Just

01:34:53 Speaker 43: in regards to call volume, this

01:34:55 Speaker 43: year so far, up until June,

01:34:58 Speaker 43: we've seen a three percent increase

01:35:01 Speaker 43: in call volume. If you look

01:35:03 Speaker 43: at last year, we had almost

01:35:05 Speaker 43: a nine percent increase in call

01:35:07 Speaker 43: volume last year, and that. Volume

01:35:12 Speaker 43: last year, and that's why it's

01:35:14 Speaker 43: important not to look one year

01:35:15 Speaker 43: at a time. You have to

01:35:16 Speaker 43: look at over periods of five

01:35:17 Speaker 43: years and ten years to see.

01:35:20 Speaker 43: And if you see below the

01:35:23 Speaker 43: last bullet over the last five

01:35:24 Speaker 43: years, a forty-three percent increase in

01:35:28 Speaker 43: call volume, and the last five

01:35:30 Speaker 43: years, we're looking about averaging about

01:35:32 Speaker 43: a six point six percent per

01:35:34 Speaker 43: year. The ORH study, they're looking

01:35:40 Speaker 43: predicting about five point eight percent

01:35:42 Speaker 43: over the next ten years, beginning

01:35:43 Speaker 43: in twenty twenty three. So it's

01:35:47 Speaker 43: fairly close to what they're predicting,

01:35:51 Speaker 43: but there are times where you

01:35:53 Speaker 43: see a one percent and then

01:35:54 Speaker 43: you see a nine percent, and

01:35:57 Speaker 43: they kind of just average out.

01:35:58 Speaker 43: So we are doing a comprehensive

01:35:59 Speaker 43: deployment review update. This will be

01:36:01 Speaker 43: a check-in. We're just below

01:36:04 Speaker 43: the midway point of the plan,

01:36:05 Speaker 43: and the results of that review

01:36:08 Speaker 43: will be coming out later this

01:36:09 Speaker 43: year. We're looking at call volumes,

01:36:11 Speaker 43: predicted call volumes, response times. asking

01:36:13 Speaker 43: questions about you know looking at

01:36:16 Speaker 43: population growth to see if it's

01:36:16 Speaker 43: remained the same, looking at our

01:36:18 Speaker 43: bases, the locations, shift patterns, staffing,

01:36:20 Speaker 43: and just kind of comparing it

01:36:23 Speaker 43: to what we have in place

01:36:25 Speaker 43: right now to make sure it's

01:36:27 Speaker 43: on track to be able to

01:36:29 Speaker 43: meet the our our intention of

01:36:31 Speaker 43: maintaining those response times in around

01:36:34 Speaker 43: that fifteen minutes for about four

01:36:37 Speaker 43: calls. So these the respect the

01:36:38 Speaker 43: results of the that. The results

01:36:40 Speaker 43: of that review will end up

01:36:45 Speaker 43: coming forward later this year in

01:36:48 Speaker 43: 2026 to be able to present

01:36:51 Speaker 43: to receive. Also happening, and Jessica

01:36:53 Speaker 43: will talk about this in a

01:36:55 Speaker 02: minute. There's a new triage tool.

01:36:56 Speaker 02: The current triage tool is kind

01:36:58 Speaker 02: of it's more I'd say outdated

01:36:59 Speaker 02: now. This is a new tool

01:37:03 Speaker 02: that will allow better prioritization of

01:37:04 Speaker 02: calls. And again, I'll let Jessica

01:37:06 Speaker 02: talk. about that. But we look

01:37:08 Speaker 02: forward to that to help again

01:37:10 Speaker 02: with our more immediate threats and

01:37:14 Speaker 02: life-threatening calls. It'll it'll really great

01:37:15 Speaker 02: aid with it. Also happening right

01:37:17 Speaker 02: now is we've been talking about

01:37:19 Speaker 02: this for a little over a

01:37:22 Speaker 02: year now. They are relooking at

01:37:24 Speaker 11: the response time standard. In November

01:37:26 Speaker 11: of twenty-five, they took it out

01:37:28 Speaker 11: of the regulation and brought it

01:37:30 Speaker 11: into a standard, and they've kept

01:37:31 Speaker 11: the current framework. But most likely,

01:37:33 Speaker 11: what you'll see is a new

01:37:36 Speaker 11: framework that'll look more at a

01:37:38 Speaker 11: urban rural, and remote framework in

01:37:40 Speaker 11: response to COVID calls, but that

01:37:49 Speaker 11: has not been finished yet. I

01:37:50 Speaker 11: have seen the the final. I'm

01:37:52 Speaker 11: fortunate to be able to be

01:37:55 Speaker 43: on the committee, so hopefully that

01:37:57 Speaker 43: moves forward in the next year

01:37:58 Speaker 43: or so. No, taking questions. Okay,

01:38:00 Speaker 43: thank you. So we'll focus our

01:38:01 Speaker 43: questions on the response time performance

01:38:03 Speaker 43: plan. It being noted that item

01:38:05 Speaker 43: seven C will be a chance

01:38:06 Speaker 43: for. us to ask more questions,

01:38:07 Speaker 43: both of Director McNabb, but also

01:38:10 Speaker 43: our Deputy Chief of Paramedic Services

01:38:11 Speaker 43: for the Medical Priority Dispatch System.

01:38:14 Speaker 43: So let's save any questions on

01:38:17 Speaker 43: that until we get to Item

01:38:19 Speaker 43: seven C. But with regards to

01:38:21 Speaker 43: the performance plan, any questions, Deputy

01:38:24 Speaker 43: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and

01:38:25 Speaker 43: thank you, Kevin, for that report.

01:38:26 Speaker 43: It's always interesting to see the

01:38:29 Speaker 43: numbers. You indicated that the the

01:38:30 Speaker 43: average response time is fifteen minutes

01:38:32 Speaker 43: plus or minus for. thirty some

01:38:34 Speaker 43: odd years. Where's the pinch point

01:38:37 Speaker 43: on that one, and why is

01:38:38 Speaker 43: that not advancing, getting better? Is

01:38:48 Speaker 43: it just because physically we've got

01:38:50 Speaker 43: not enough people and too much

01:38:51 Speaker 45: geography, or or the the trucks

01:38:53 Speaker 45: don't levitate yet, or what? What

01:38:54 Speaker 45: is the real reason why that

01:38:55 Speaker 45: number just doesn't seem to move?

01:38:57 Speaker 45: Please. In in rural Ontario, I

01:39:00 Speaker 45: think the biggest thing that we

01:39:01 Speaker 45: face is. geography, as far as

01:39:03 Speaker 45: being able to respond, and we're

01:39:04 Speaker 45: talking nine times out of ten,

01:39:06 Speaker 45: or the ninetieth percentile. So it

01:39:07 Speaker 45: really gives you only ten percent

01:39:11 Speaker 45: of the calls that could be

01:39:12 Speaker 45: above above that time. And when

01:39:14 Speaker 45: you look at the mapping that

01:39:15 Speaker 45: we're doing around bases, and being

01:39:16 Speaker 45: able to spread out our resources,

01:39:18 Speaker 45: we're trying to tackle those areas

01:39:19 Speaker 45: to try to improve upon them,

01:39:20 Speaker 45: recognizing also that those areas are

01:39:23 Speaker 45: lower density, lower call volume. So

01:39:24 Speaker 45: being able to find the best

01:39:25 Speaker 45: way. to match resources with density

01:39:26 Speaker 45: versus area, that's why we have

01:39:28 Speaker 45: to have R H to help

01:39:30 Speaker 45: guide us in that. But so

01:39:34 Speaker 45: I would say so. There's a

01:39:38 Speaker 45: combination here. One is the large

01:39:39 Speaker 45: geography of Gray County, and then

01:39:40 Speaker 45: it's also rising in call volumes.

01:39:43 Speaker 33: Both both of those I would

01:39:46 Speaker 33: say are the major factors. Considering

01:39:48 Speaker 33: the size of our county. and

01:39:50 Speaker 33: being able to say that nine

01:39:51 Speaker 33: times out of ten that we're

01:40:01 Speaker 33: arriving, you know, in the drive

01:40:02 Speaker 33: time of thirteen and a half

01:40:05 Speaker 46: to fourteen minutes when you include

01:40:06 Speaker 46: shoot time, we're working pretty hard.

01:40:08 Speaker 46: Like we, we we don't leave

01:40:09 Speaker 43: areas uncovered. You know, we move

01:40:12 Speaker 43: multiple standbys to be able to

01:40:14 Speaker 43: cover those areas off to split

01:40:15 Speaker 43: differences. There's a lot of work

01:40:17 Speaker 43: that goes in the background. The

01:40:19 Speaker 43: call that's just happened, you know,

01:40:21 Speaker 43: we know what resources are going,

01:40:22 Speaker 43: what's needed, but nobody really sees

01:40:24 Speaker 43: the planning that goes in the

01:40:26 Speaker 43: background to say, well, what happens

01:40:28 Speaker 43: with the next call. To say,

01:40:29 Speaker 43: well, what happens when the next

01:40:31 Speaker 43: call happens? We're trying to put

01:40:33 Speaker 43: resources in place for the call

01:40:37 Speaker 43: that hasn't happened yet. So it's

01:40:39 Speaker 43: not just about responding to the

01:40:40 Speaker 43: call; it's about thinking about where

01:40:43 Speaker 43: the next call is going to

01:40:45 Speaker 43: be and try to minimizing that

01:40:46 Speaker 43: next response in case something happens,

01:40:48 Speaker 43: and it's hard to predict. Okay,

01:40:50 Speaker 43: thank you. We'll go to Councillor

01:40:53 Speaker 43: Kevney. Thank you, Madam Warden, and

01:40:55 Speaker 43: Director McNab. May I ask you

01:40:57 Speaker 43: how much of a challenge is

01:40:58 Speaker 43: Google mapping in terms of new

01:41:00 Speaker 43: addressing, new civic addressing, getting uploaded

01:41:03 Speaker 43: into Google Maps, and and is

01:41:05 Speaker 43: that creating any issue for you

01:41:06 Speaker 43: in finding those new addresses? I

01:41:07 Speaker 43: would say that we have a

01:41:08 Speaker 43: fairly extensive GIS team. That so

01:41:10 Speaker 43: when there are new streets, they're

01:41:11 Speaker 43: in constant contact with our dispatch

01:41:12 Speaker 43: centre and be able to update

01:41:15 Speaker 43: those maps. I think sometimes we

01:41:17 Speaker 43: end up in new developments where

01:41:18 Speaker 43: it may be a private road

01:41:19 Speaker 43: or a private area that doesn't

01:41:21 Speaker 43: get updated. Sometimes those take longer,

01:41:22 Speaker 43: and we sometimes enter like when

01:41:24 Speaker 43: we see a look at a

01:41:27 Speaker 43: response time, we see that that

01:41:28 Speaker 43: wasn't indicated. So we do have

01:41:29 Speaker 43: mechanisms to trigger when our response

01:41:35 Speaker 43: times aren't met. We looked at

01:41:40 Speaker 43: the reasons why, and sometimes that's

01:41:43 Speaker 43: able to trigger that there's a

01:41:48 Speaker 43: mapping updated required. But our dispatch

01:41:49 Speaker 43: generally has, I would say, almost

01:41:54 Speaker 43: always the most up to date

01:41:55 Speaker 43: map in the vehicles. The the

01:41:57 Speaker 43: CAC the dispatch. centre they send

01:41:59 Speaker 18: the location with the coordinates to

01:42:04 Speaker 18: the to the vehicle which has

01:42:05 Speaker 18: been an update that's been in

01:42:08 Speaker 18: place now probably since 2021 like

01:42:10 Speaker 18: having the the map already displayed

01:42:13 Speaker 18: in the truck and we use

01:42:14 Speaker 18: ways for it so we're able

01:42:16 Speaker 18: to bring in road closures and

01:42:18 Speaker 18: stuff like that which has significantly

01:42:21 Speaker 18: helped the response. There's some addresses

01:42:23 Speaker 18: if you're not like if we

01:42:24 Speaker 18: have a paramedic working in Gray

01:42:27 Speaker 18: they could have grew up in

01:42:29 Speaker 18: Craigleith and they have to work

01:42:31 Speaker 18: in Hanover having that ability you

01:42:37 Speaker 18: know to get in the truck

01:42:39 Speaker 18: and to know where you're going,

01:42:41 Speaker 18: really helps. So we tried it

01:42:43 Speaker 18: with that, but but yeah, I

01:42:44 Speaker 18: would say you know there's lots

01:42:48 Speaker 18: of work in the background to

01:42:49 Speaker 18: ensure that the GIS information is

01:42:50 Speaker 43: up to date at dispatch, and

01:42:53 Speaker 43: they're they're always overlaying those new

01:42:54 Speaker 43: roads into the CAD. I'm not

01:42:56 Speaker 43: saying it's perfect, but they we

01:42:58 Speaker 43: do work hard to make sure

01:43:00 Speaker 43: nothing's missed. Okay. Anything else, Councillor

01:43:01 Speaker 43: McCabe? Sorry, Mackie. ah, ah, you

01:43:03 Speaker 43: get my dessert at lunch. Well,

01:43:04 Speaker 43: Warden, I can say that you're

01:43:06 Speaker 43: not the first person that's made

01:43:08 Speaker 43: that mistake. Thank you, Kevin. Thank

01:43:16 Speaker 43: you very much for the report,

01:43:22 Speaker 43: and I'm, you know, I'm impressed

01:43:25 Speaker 43: with our response times. I had

01:43:27 Speaker 43: the the opportunity to witness the

01:43:30 Speaker 47: response times to my mother's house

01:43:34 Speaker 47: a couple days ago, and I

01:43:36 Speaker 47: was very impressed. She is quite

01:43:38 Speaker 47: rurally located, and the length of

01:43:45 Speaker 47: time was it was less than

01:43:46 Speaker 47: what I anticipated. The ambulance arriving,

01:43:48 Speaker 47: so and the crew did a

01:43:49 Speaker 43: wonderful job looking after. My question

01:43:51 Speaker 43: is in in regards to the

01:43:53 Speaker 43: response times. How does our winter

01:43:55 Speaker 43: weather factor into the? Do we

01:43:57 Speaker 43: have any idea what our inclement

01:44:01 Speaker 43: winter weather does to our response

01:44:02 Speaker 43: times? Thank you. Yeah, generally winter

01:44:04 Speaker 43: will play a role in this,

01:44:05 Speaker 43: whether it's icy roads or can't

01:44:07 Speaker 43: see and stuff like that. Again,

01:44:10 Speaker 43: that falls into that ten percent

01:44:11 Speaker 43: range of anomalies. Like I, I

01:44:12 Speaker 43: don't can't like say off the

01:44:14 Speaker 43: top of my head like what

01:44:15 Speaker 43: what the time difference is, but

01:44:16 Speaker 43: you see it that when we

01:44:19 Speaker 43: look at response times where we

01:44:21 Speaker 43: didn't meet the target, that the

01:44:23 Speaker 43: weather is related. Like we ask

01:44:26 Speaker 43: the crew when the call closes,

01:44:28 Speaker 43: why did it take you this

01:44:30 Speaker 43: long to get to the call,

01:44:32 Speaker 43: and then usually it's. And usually,

01:44:34 Speaker 43: it's generally the two most common

01:44:34 Speaker 43: are distance and weather. Okay, thank

01:44:38 Speaker 43: you, Councillor McKay. Thank you, Alderman

01:44:40 Speaker 43: Thornton. You, Kevin, do you keep

01:44:42 Speaker 43: stats on AED calls, private, like

01:44:44 Speaker 43: the ones that are in the

01:44:46 Speaker 43: public hands, and that how many

01:44:48 Speaker 43: times they're used and are they

01:44:51 Speaker 43: worthwhile? How are they these ones

01:44:52 Speaker 43: in certain places? I guess arenas,

01:44:56 Speaker 43: yes. But thanks. One of the

01:44:56 Speaker 43: issues with the response time framework,

01:45:01 Speaker 43: and we've talked about data a

01:45:02 Speaker 21: fair bit, is actually using that

01:45:06 Speaker 21: data towards ours and getting that

01:45:08 Speaker 21: those times back. Like typically, it's

01:45:14 Speaker 21: based only when the ambulance arrives.

01:45:16 Speaker 21: But are AEDs necessary? Yeah, they

01:45:18 Speaker 48: are. Well, if you have one

01:45:21 Speaker 48: AED work once. a year. Depends

01:45:22 Speaker 48: who it's for, I guess, but

01:45:24 Speaker 48: I would say it's worth it

01:45:27 Speaker 48: no matter what. I hope someday

01:45:28 Speaker 48: that AEDs are in every home.

01:45:30 Speaker 48: That's where it needs to be.

01:45:32 Speaker 48: Most cardiac arrests happen in the

01:45:33 Speaker 48: home. That's probably where they need

01:45:39 Speaker 48: to get to. Right now, it's

01:45:42 Speaker 48: been mandated to be on job

01:45:43 Speaker 45: sites, but you know, we—I'd say

01:45:46 Speaker 45: we have a fairly strong programme

01:45:48 Speaker 45: here in Gray. That part of

01:45:50 Speaker 45: the paramedic services budget is to

01:45:52 Speaker 45: maintain over the 200 that we

01:45:54 Speaker 45: have. We ensure that there's batteries.

01:45:55 Speaker 45: and pads, and that they're doing

01:45:56 Speaker 45: their checks, that they're ready to

01:45:58 Speaker 45: go when they're needed. But, but

01:46:01 Speaker 45: I, I really hope a day

01:46:02 Speaker 45: comes that we expand a DFB,

01:46:04 Speaker 45: maybe gets to be three hundred

01:46:07 Speaker 45: dollars or five hundred dollars, that

01:46:09 Speaker 45: people can afford them in their

01:46:09 Speaker 45: homes. And, but yeah, we we

01:46:11 Speaker 45: do use public access DFBs. We've

01:46:13 Speaker 45: had them in arenas. We've used

01:46:16 Speaker 45: them in different places. Yet, I

01:46:19 Speaker 45: would say it's worthwhile to keep

01:46:21 Speaker 45: going with. Okay, thank you. We'll

01:46:23 Speaker 45: go to Councillor Greg and then

01:46:24 Speaker 45: to alternate Councillor Kepka. Thank you,

01:46:26 Speaker 45: Kevin. My question is: How do

01:46:28 Speaker 45: hospital offloading requirements impact your your

01:46:30 Speaker 45: response times? And certainly, it was

01:46:32 Speaker 45: a significant challenge going back a

01:46:35 Speaker 45: few years. You're having your resources—I

01:46:37 Speaker 45: don't want to say tied up,

01:46:38 Speaker 45: but being required for prolonged periods

01:46:40 Speaker 45: of time at hospitals offloading. How

01:46:42 Speaker 45: are we comparing that? How are

01:46:44 Speaker 45: we comparing now to the the

01:47:00 Speaker 45: challenges of a few years ago,

01:47:02 Speaker 45: and and what are the impacts

01:47:03 Speaker 03: of that still on on the

01:47:10 Speaker 45: plan that you're putting forward? Yeah,

01:47:12 Speaker 45: prior probably to 2022, I would

01:47:15 Speaker 45: say we really didn't have an

01:47:18 Speaker 49: offload problem, but in 2022 we

01:47:21 Speaker 49: have seen increases, particularly in Owen

01:47:23 Speaker 49: Sound and in Collingwood in the

01:47:26 Speaker 49: wintertime. I can't say enough about

01:47:30 Speaker 49: Bright Shores of how they've tried

01:47:36 Speaker 49: to do things to help. We

01:47:38 Speaker 49: have the fit to sit programme.

01:47:39 Speaker 49: now. We have extra offload stretchers.

01:47:41 Speaker 45: We have an offload duty nurse,

01:47:43 Speaker 45: which we've asked for more funding

01:47:44 Speaker 45: to be able to have a

01:47:45 Speaker 45: nurse available. We haven't received that

01:47:48 Speaker 45: yet. They only probably give us

01:47:50 Speaker 45: a quarter of what we need

01:47:51 Speaker 45: for that programme that to support

01:47:52 Speaker 45: the hospital. We hope that that'll

01:47:54 Speaker 45: increase this year, but it does

01:47:55 Speaker 45: create issues. Like you know, when

01:47:56 Speaker 45: sandwiches are busiest, centre on busy

01:48:01 Speaker 45: days, it can be not uncommon

01:48:03 Speaker 45: to have four or five ambulances

01:48:05 Speaker 45: sitting and waiting. Five animals just

01:48:08 Speaker 45: sitting and waiting for a bed,

01:48:10 Speaker 21: and so then that's a communication

01:48:11 Speaker 21: between supervisor and the nurse and

01:48:13 Speaker 21: the crews. Sometimes we double up

01:48:16 Speaker 21: patients, stuff like that. But no,

01:48:19 Speaker 21: it can be challenging at times,

01:48:20 Speaker 21: and it always seems to happen

01:48:22 Speaker 21: when you're the busiest too. Like

01:48:24 Speaker 21: typically, it's flu season. Merge is

01:48:26 Speaker 21: busy, most likely because we were

01:48:27 Speaker 21: busy. Okay, alternate. Part of the

01:48:30 Speaker 21: ORH review will be to to

01:48:32 Speaker 21: be looking at that again, and

01:48:34 Speaker 21: they will be able to comment

01:48:41 Speaker 21: on it. Thank you, through you,

01:48:42 Speaker 21: Warden, to Kevin. My question is

01:48:45 Speaker 21: more regarding communication, and I wondered

01:48:47 Speaker 43: when a call comes in, and

01:48:48 Speaker 43: it's answered by. whatever services are

01:48:51 Speaker 43: required to go there. Is it

01:48:53 Speaker 43: communicated to the incident how long

01:48:54 Speaker 43: approximately resources may be coming? That's

01:48:55 Speaker 43: one thing our dispatch centre will

01:48:57 Speaker 43: not do. I don't believe that

01:48:58 Speaker 43: they will say that time. They

01:49:05 Speaker 43: will reassure them that they've been

01:49:08 Speaker 43: dispatched and on their way. But

01:49:13 Speaker 43: I don't believe that they actually

01:49:14 Speaker 43: give a time because that could

01:49:16 Speaker 43: change. If they're going to be

01:49:18 Speaker 50: delayed, they will call back. you

01:49:20 Speaker 50: know. Within, I think I believe

01:49:24 Speaker 50: it's thirty minutes. They do a

01:49:26 Speaker 50: check in, but they do not

01:49:28 Speaker 50: say they're going to be six

01:49:29 Speaker 50: or seven minutes or whatever that

01:49:32 Speaker 50: time is. Okay. Any further questions

01:49:35 Speaker 50: on this one? All right. Not

01:49:36 Speaker 50: seeing any further hands. All those

01:49:37 Speaker 50: in favour? Okay. That motion is

01:49:39 Speaker 50: carried. Thank you. So we will

01:49:41 Speaker 50: now move on to item seven

01:49:43 Speaker 50: C. It's recommended that report PSRCW

01:49:45 Speaker 50: zero six twenty six regarding the

01:49:47 Speaker 50: medical priority dispatch. System be received

01:49:49 Speaker 50: for information. They ask for a

01:49:51 Speaker 50: mover and a seconder. Got it

01:49:52 Speaker 50: moved by Councillor Pringle, seconded by

01:49:54 Speaker 50: Councillor Patterson. It's on the floor

01:49:56 Speaker 50: for discussion. So, Director McNab, I

01:49:58 Speaker 50: understand you are going to be

01:50:04 Speaker 50: introducing Deputy Chief Rob for this

01:50:05 Speaker 50: one as well. Yes, thank you,

01:50:09 Speaker 50: Warden and Council. It's my pleasure

01:50:10 Speaker 50: to introduce Jessica Rob, who's our

01:50:12 Speaker 50: Deputy Chief of Operations, and she's

01:50:14 Speaker 50: done the. majority of the work

01:50:17 Speaker 50: on this implementation. It's been quite

01:50:19 Speaker 50: a process to get to where

01:50:22 Speaker 50: it is today. There's a lot

01:50:23 Speaker 50: of work that goes in the

01:50:26 Speaker 50: background to implement this, and so

01:50:28 Speaker 50: who who best to tell you

01:50:31 Speaker 50: about it than her? So here

01:50:33 Speaker 50: we go. Good morning, Marden. All

01:50:35 Speaker 50: right, counselors. Thank you for having

01:50:37 Speaker 50: me. So it is the recommendation

01:50:38 Speaker 50: of our department that we present

01:50:41 Speaker 50: this report for. your information and

01:50:44 Speaker 50: understanding of how the implementation of

01:50:46 Speaker 50: this new system will impact the

01:50:47 Speaker 50: community. On October 14th of

01:50:50 Speaker 50: this year, our CAC London Dispatch

01:50:53 Speaker 50: Centre is going to be changing

01:50:56 Speaker 50: to a new dispatch system known

01:50:57 Speaker 50: as the Medical Priority Dispatch System,

01:51:00 Speaker 50: or MPDS, is what we call

01:51:02 Speaker 50: it. So this new system is

01:51:03 Speaker 50: being implemented by the Ministry of

01:51:05 Speaker 50: Health. They're rolling it out province-wide,

01:51:06 Speaker 50: and about half of the province

01:51:07 Speaker 50: has transitioned so far to date.

01:51:13 Speaker 50: it's going to be replacing our

01:51:15 Speaker 50: current system, which we call DPCI.

01:51:16 Speaker 50: It's been in place since the

01:51:20 Speaker 50: early '90s, and the goal of

01:51:23 Speaker 50: this new system is to optimize

01:51:24 Speaker 50: the resources across the county and

01:51:26 Speaker 50: get our paramedics to the sickest

01:51:29 Speaker 50: and most at-risk patients first. This

01:51:30 Speaker 50: chart represents a comparison of

01:51:33 Speaker 50: the old model versus the new

01:51:35 Speaker 50: model. Under DPCI, you'll see code

01:51:42 Speaker 50: four and code three were the

01:51:44 Speaker 50: only level of priority calls. for

01:51:46 Speaker 50: the community, so these two categories

01:51:49 Speaker 50: would be all inclusive of any

01:51:51 Speaker 50: medical emergency coming in through the

01:51:54 Speaker 50: 911 system. Whereas the MPDS has

01:51:55 Speaker 50: divided it down into five different

01:51:58 Speaker 50: priority levels. So under the

01:52:00 Speaker 50: current DPCI, a person

01:52:03 Speaker 50: experiencing vomiting or a laceration,

01:52:06 Speaker 50: a heart attack or a cardiac

01:52:08 Speaker 50: arrest could all be assigned as

01:52:11 Speaker 50: a code four response. These calls

01:52:13 Speaker 50: would be entered into the queue

01:52:19 Speaker 50: as they're received, and then dispatched

01:52:20 Speaker 50: on a first come. first serve

01:52:22 Speaker 50: basis. Under the new MPDS, dispatchers

01:52:23 Speaker 50: are going to be able to

01:52:26 Speaker 50: better prioritize medical conditions and divert

01:52:27 Speaker 50: ambulances to areas when an immediate

01:52:30 Speaker 50: life threat is identified. So, if

01:52:33 Speaker 50: there is a unit that is

01:52:35 Speaker 50: assigned on a priority basis for

01:52:36 Speaker 50: a patient with a laceration, and

01:52:40 Speaker 50: if they've been identified as the

01:52:42 Speaker 50: closest unit to a cardiac arrest

01:52:46 Speaker 50: that comes in, they will be

01:52:48 Speaker 50: diverted to the patient who has

01:52:51 Speaker 50: the greater need for timely care.

01:52:54 Speaker 50: So, in addition to being able

01:52:56 Speaker 50: to improve the triaging of medical

01:53:00 Speaker 50: emergencies, some key changes include best

01:53:02 Speaker 50: unit assignments, low priority thresholds, and

01:53:05 Speaker 50: region critical counts. All of which

01:53:07 Speaker 50: will help us improve our emergency

01:53:13 Speaker 50: coverage across the county. It also

01:53:15 Speaker 50: gives us an opportunity to better

01:53:16 Speaker 50: prioritize interfacility transfers to balance our

01:53:19 Speaker 50: community needs with the hospital needs.

01:53:21 Speaker 50: MPDS is clinically validated as safe

01:53:23 Speaker 50: and reliable way to triage medical

01:53:25 Speaker 50: conditions, and there's quality assurance programmemes

01:53:27 Speaker 50: in place, including a dispatch review

01:53:29 Speaker 50: committee in each jurisdiction, and they

01:53:32 Speaker 50: continuously review calls as they come

01:53:34 Speaker 50: in and the impacts of the

01:53:37 Speaker 50: wait times. Communities are going to

01:53:38 Speaker 50: see improved prioritization of life-threatening emergencies,

01:53:45 Speaker 50: more efficient operations, more sustainable programmeings.

01:53:48 Speaker 50: There may be community members. with

01:53:49 Speaker 50: lower needs who experience delays for

01:53:51 Speaker 50: service, and healthcare facilities will see

01:53:52 Speaker 21: changes in how transfers are prioritized.

01:53:54 Speaker 21: So, to make sure that we

01:53:56 Speaker 21: are prepared, we've taken a number

01:53:58 Speaker 21: of steps. We've met with all

01:54:01 Speaker 21: of the fire chiefs in the

01:54:06 Speaker 21: county, and we've all been able

01:54:07 Speaker 21: to agree that the translation of

01:54:09 Speaker 21: responses from the current DPDI to

01:54:12 Speaker 21: MPDS will maintain the same level

01:54:14 Speaker 21: of response that the. community is

01:54:17 Speaker 21: receiving now. Our deployment utilization strategy

01:54:20 Speaker 21: has been updated to account for

01:54:22 Speaker 51: resource allocation, wait times, and thresholds.

01:54:24 Speaker 51: Staff education has been built in

01:54:28 Speaker 51: short, online, digestible modules for staff

01:54:30 Speaker 51: to complete at their ability. We

01:54:31 Speaker 51: have staff who are sitting on

01:54:33 Speaker 52: regional change management and dispatch review

01:54:36 Speaker 52: committees that will continue throughout the

01:54:37 Speaker 52: transition and afterwards, and we have.

01:54:39 Speaker 52: ongoing engagement sessions with our hospitals,

01:54:45 Speaker 52: long-term care, fire, and police departments.

01:54:46 Speaker 52: So dispatch operations are governed by

01:54:48 Speaker 52: the Ministry of Health, and they

01:54:50 Speaker 52: develop this patient journey, which outlines

01:54:52 Speaker 52: how emergency calls are received and

01:54:54 Speaker 52: how they're prioritized in the queue.

01:55:01 Speaker 52: And then we take that information

01:55:07 Speaker 53: and create a plan for the

01:55:09 Speaker 53: deployment to the emergency calls based

01:55:10 Speaker 53: on our local resources and capacity.

01:55:13 Speaker 33: No changes. to funding, staffing, or

01:55:14 Speaker 33: resources is anticipated to facilitate this

01:55:15 Speaker 33: change, and we're confident we're prepared

01:55:18 Speaker 33: for a seamless transition. Thank you.

01:55:20 Speaker 33: Thank you very much for those

01:55:21 Speaker 33: details and the explanation about what

01:55:24 Speaker 33: it means differently and how you've

01:55:27 Speaker 33: been able to parse it now

01:55:29 Speaker 33: into the colour coding instead of

01:55:30 Speaker 33: grouped together. It sounds like it

01:55:37 Speaker 33: must be a very exciting transition

01:55:40 Speaker 33: for you. Yeah, absolutely. All right.

01:55:43 Speaker 33: So with that, any questions, Deputy

01:55:45 Speaker 33: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and

01:55:47 Speaker 33: thank you, Jessica, for the report

01:55:48 Speaker 33: for the discussion there. When an

01:55:50 Speaker 33: airplane's taking off, there's a certain

01:55:53 Speaker 50: point of no return. They must

01:55:54 Speaker 50: continue to. What would be the

01:55:56 Speaker 50: point of no return for an

01:55:58 Speaker 50: ambulance responding to an incident of

01:55:59 Speaker 50: low acuity, before they would not

01:56:00 Speaker 50: be diverted? Like, would it be

01:56:03 Speaker 50: literally? they turn in the gate?

01:56:07 Speaker 50: Nope, we're not going there. We're

01:56:09 Speaker 50: going further. Or is is there

01:56:11 Speaker 50: a point of no return where

01:56:16 Speaker 50: they would respond to a certain

01:56:17 Speaker 50: call before they would be diverted?

01:56:18 Speaker 50: Please. Yeah, it would be my

01:56:20 Speaker 50: understanding that that would be at

01:56:23 Speaker 50: the time of patient contact. So,

01:56:24 Speaker 50: should a higher acuity come call

01:56:26 Speaker 50: come in, if that ambulance hasn't

01:56:27 Speaker 50: made patient contact, they could be

01:56:29 Speaker 50: diverted. Okay. Thank you. Great question.

01:56:31 Speaker 50: Oh, Councillor Heaney. Thank you, Madam

01:56:33 Speaker 50: Warden, and Jessica. I'm just wondering,

01:56:36 Speaker 50: in relation to your conversations with

01:56:39 Speaker 50: our fire departments as municipalities, should

01:56:43 Speaker 50: we be concerned that there may

01:56:49 Speaker 50: be a greater number of medical

01:56:53 Speaker 50: calls coming to our fire departments?

01:56:57 Speaker 54: Are we prepared for that? Just

01:57:01 Speaker 54: thinking as you're talking about the

01:57:04 Speaker 54: transition period and the possible diversion

01:57:06 Speaker 54: of certain calls. I'm just asking:

01:57:12 Speaker 54: Should our fire departments be prepared

01:57:16 Speaker 54: for a greater number of calls?

01:57:19 Speaker 54: Thank you. I can't predict what's

01:57:24 Speaker 54: going to happen, but I don't.

01:57:28 Speaker 54: I don't believe so. I think

01:57:34 Speaker 54: actually, it's we're gonna. This progress

01:57:37 Speaker 54: is gonna make us make sure

01:57:38 Speaker 54: that we have the right resources

01:57:40 Speaker 54: going at the right times, instead

01:57:44 Speaker 54: of having system overwhelm. And we

01:57:46 Speaker 54: were we were very clear when

01:57:49 Speaker 54: we sat. The fire chiefs were

01:57:50 Speaker 54: very receptive to working as a

01:57:54 Speaker 54: team, and we talked through a

01:57:57 Speaker 54: lot of the points. And we

01:58:00 Speaker 54: talked about things like MBCs, where

01:58:04 Speaker 54: a low priority MBC or motor

01:58:07 Speaker 54: vehicle collision might experience a delay

01:58:11 Speaker 54: in paramedics arriving because it's triaged

01:58:14 Speaker 54: as a green, but they would

01:58:16 Speaker 54: still be dispatched to it. But

01:58:17 Speaker 54: we talked about how that would

01:58:19 Speaker 54: be important because they have other

01:58:21 Speaker 54: roles to play when it comes

01:58:24 Speaker 54: to scene safety. and protecting of

01:58:26 Speaker 21: the scene and things, they have

01:58:27 Speaker 21: a lot of other things that

01:58:29 Speaker 21: they provide, not necessarily based on

01:58:32 Speaker 21: patient contact. So the way that

01:58:35 Speaker 21: a patient is triage doesn't necessarily

01:58:37 Speaker 21: relate to our need for allied

01:58:41 Speaker 21: agencies on scene. Is that fair?

01:58:42 Speaker 21: Okay, thank you. We'll go to

01:58:44 Speaker 21: Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, Warden, and

01:58:45 Speaker 21: Jessica. Just. to the deputy warden's

01:58:47 Speaker 21: question and your answer, I can't

01:58:49 Speaker 21: imagine seeing an ambulance pulling up

01:58:51 Speaker 21: my laneway and then having them

01:58:54 Speaker 21: diverted because they haven't actually made

01:58:54 Speaker 21: patient contact. I wondered at some

01:58:56 Speaker 21: point we have other buses, you

01:58:58 Speaker 21: know, covering the area or doing

01:59:01 Speaker 21: things, but. is it communicated to

01:59:03 Speaker 21: the caller their level of priority

01:59:07 Speaker 21: when the call comes in? I,

01:59:08 Speaker 21: in this instance, you know, you

01:59:09 Speaker 21: see the the ambulance coming down

01:59:11 Speaker 21: your farm lane way and then

01:59:12 Speaker 21: backing out and leaving. Um, it

01:59:15 Speaker 50: just I can't imagine the feeling

01:59:16 Speaker 50: of the patient wondering, you know.

01:59:18 Speaker 50: I'm going to bleed to death,

01:59:19 Speaker 50: or could you just please assure

01:59:21 Speaker 50: us that there's other methods in

01:59:22 Speaker 50: place that diversion would be a

01:59:24 Speaker 50: last resort, or the communication to

01:59:27 Speaker 50: the caller or patient they understand

01:59:29 Speaker 50: that they're not a priority. How

01:59:31 Speaker 50: does that work? Okay, just before

01:59:33 Speaker 50: you speak, I do see Director

01:59:35 Speaker 50: McNab is also lining up to

01:59:36 Speaker 50: be able to. facilitate in both

01:59:39 Speaker 50: of you responding, keeping in mind

01:59:41 Speaker 50: too that that what you're describing

01:59:44 Speaker 50: to us is a practice that's

01:59:45 Speaker 50: already in place. It's just using

01:59:48 Speaker 50: the old system right now. So

01:59:51 Speaker 50: there, I'm hearing, if we understand

01:59:55 Speaker 50: correctly, from Director Mc Dow's first

01:59:56 Speaker 50: response to the Deputy Warden, or

01:59:58 Speaker 50: sorry, to the the Deputy Chief,

02:00:00 Speaker 43: that this has always been in

02:00:03 Speaker 43: play. There's always been that question

02:00:05 Speaker 43: of when is the point of

02:00:08 Speaker 43: no return on the. old numbered

02:00:10 Speaker 43: system. Now it's just further refined

02:00:11 Speaker 43: into the colour system. So I

02:00:14 Speaker 43: guess that question may arise more

02:00:17 Speaker 43: frequently than it might have when

02:00:18 Speaker 43: it was just a simple one,

02:00:22 Speaker 43: two, three. So with that, I

02:00:24 Speaker 43: invite the deputy chief to respond

02:00:25 Speaker 43: and and lean into Director Munab

02:00:28 Speaker 43: if you prefer. Thank you. I

02:00:30 Speaker 43: can say that it is like

02:00:31 Speaker 43: it is a current practice. As

02:00:33 Speaker 43: you saw in the chart, there

02:00:36 Speaker 43: is a code three and code

02:00:37 Speaker 43: four priority currently. So if an

02:00:39 Speaker 43: ambulance was dispatched on a code

02:00:40 Speaker 43: three or a low priority call,

02:00:42 Speaker 43: and a code four or a

02:00:44 Speaker 43: higher priority call came in, they

02:00:47 Speaker 43: would be redirected to that if

02:00:48 Speaker 43: they were the closest unit. So,

02:00:50 Speaker 43: it is an ongoing practice. Prior

02:00:51 Speaker 43: to paramedics arriving on scene, the

02:00:53 Speaker 43: patient would be in kind of

02:00:56 Speaker 43: the care and control of the

02:00:58 Speaker 43: dispatch centre and be maintaining communications

02:01:00 Speaker 43: with them. I don't think I

02:01:02 Speaker 43: could fairly speak to their policies,

02:01:04 Speaker 43: but as Director McNaught mentioned, they

02:01:07 Speaker 43: do have regular point contacts. where

02:01:08 Speaker 43: they call back and make contact

02:01:11 Speaker 43: with the patient based on their

02:01:12 Speaker 43: acuity. I would invite Kevin to

02:01:15 Speaker 43: answer anything further that I might

02:01:16 Speaker 43: be missing. Patients are always advised

02:01:19 Speaker 43: if the condition changes to call

02:01:21 Speaker 43: back, and there also is check-ins.

02:01:22 Speaker 43: I believe it's thirty minutes. Just

02:01:24 Speaker 43: recognizing here, the the likelihood of

02:01:25 Speaker 43: that happening is small, but but

02:01:26 Speaker 43: the thing is now even better

02:01:29 Speaker 43: with this new priority tool. If

02:01:30 Speaker 43: we're pulling somebody off for. a

02:01:32 Speaker 43: cardiac arrest from somebody now that

02:01:34 Speaker 43: is an imminently dying, it's to

02:01:36 Speaker 43: help that other person. These are

02:01:40 Speaker 43: difficult discussions and conversations, but it's

02:01:42 Speaker 43: with the best intent to do

02:01:44 Speaker 43: the most for the most critical.

02:01:46 Speaker 43: So I feel for what you're

02:01:48 Speaker 43: saying; like it's not great, and

02:01:50 Speaker 43: is most likely we get an

02:01:52 Speaker 43: inquiry about why the ambulance left,

02:01:54 Speaker 43: and potentially the patient family could

02:01:57 Speaker 43: call and say, "I think the

02:01:58 Speaker 43: ambulance got. They think they might

02:02:00 Speaker 43: have the wrong address." You know.

02:02:02 Speaker 43: stuff like that. But those type

02:02:04 Speaker 43: of conversations would take place if

02:02:07 Speaker 43: they call back. I I know

02:02:09 Speaker 43: because we talked about this before

02:02:10 Speaker 43: in the past about outside of

02:02:12 Speaker 43: the thirty minutes, like they don't

02:02:13 Speaker 43: give times, and I can see

02:02:14 Speaker 43: some reasons for that. But I'm

02:02:15 Speaker 43: not sure. Like when I look

02:02:17 Speaker 43: at our like when we measure

02:02:19 Speaker 43: code four times, we measure from

02:02:23 Speaker 43: the time the pager goes off

02:02:28 Speaker 43: to the time we arrive, because

02:02:31 Speaker 43: code four life and death call.

02:02:33 Speaker 54: Because code four life and death

02:02:38 Speaker 54: calls can't be held, like they

02:02:41 Speaker 54: just they have to be dispatched

02:02:44 Speaker 54: right out. Code three calls are

02:02:48 Speaker 54: now when you look at your

02:02:50 Speaker 54: yellow, your green, yellow, and orange,

02:02:53 Speaker 54: they can be held, and that

02:02:57 Speaker 54: we call that a T one

02:03:00 Speaker 54: time, not a T two time.

02:03:01 Speaker 54: When we look at our, if

02:03:07 Speaker 54: we look at it today, like

02:03:10 Speaker 54: our T one time, the time

02:03:11 Speaker 54: of the call receipt of the

02:03:13 Speaker 54: cact to the time we arrive

02:03:15 Speaker 21: for code threes, again back to

02:03:17 Speaker 21: these green, yellow, and orange, in

02:03:20 Speaker 21: twenty. In 2026, it's 25 minutes.

02:03:22 Speaker 21: So these are lower priority emergency

02:03:24 Speaker 21: calls. Nine times out of ten,

02:03:26 Speaker 21: even including the hold time, is

02:03:31 Speaker 21: still pretty good. Out of nine

02:03:35 Speaker 21: times out of ten, but it

02:03:36 Speaker 21: cannot happen. Yeah, but hopefully, you

02:03:37 Speaker 21: know, I look. There's nothing more

02:03:40 Speaker 21: frustrating as a paramedic that you

02:03:41 Speaker 21: know that somebody they may be

02:03:43 Speaker 21: vomiting and short of breath. Today

02:03:48 Speaker 21: it's a code four, and then

02:03:50 Speaker 21: a cardiac arrest happens around the

02:03:51 Speaker 21: corner. We can't be taken off

02:03:52 Speaker 21: that call. I feel for the

02:03:55 Speaker 21: person that's short of breath and

02:03:56 Speaker 43: vomiting, but that's not an immediate

02:03:58 Speaker 43: threat. And I have to wait

02:04:01 Speaker 43: for an ambulance to go to

02:04:02 Speaker 43: the cardiac arrest that's ten minutes

02:04:04 Speaker 43: away, where I could just go,

02:04:07 Speaker 43: and we we can't do that

02:04:09 Speaker 43: today. Tomorrow, tomorrow we can, or

02:04:11 Speaker 43: October we can. Follow up, and

02:04:13 Speaker 43: thank you. Totally understand. Just when

02:04:14 Speaker 43: it's said out loud and being

02:04:17 Speaker 43: recorded, it's it's often. misinterpreted

02:04:20 Speaker 43: and and the perception they they

02:04:23 Speaker 43: don't always have that information and

02:04:25 Speaker 43: I appreciate the deputy chief's comments

02:04:26 Speaker 43: about and yours about callbacks. There's

02:04:28 Speaker 43: they're in touch with the patient.

02:04:30 Speaker 43: They're monitoring their their situation. So

02:04:32 Speaker 43: the communication piece is so critical.

02:04:34 Speaker 43: And looking forward to this helping

02:04:36 Speaker 43: you deliver the service that you

02:04:37 Speaker 43: so want to do. We so

02:04:39 Speaker 43: want to do. Okay, thank you.

02:04:40 Speaker 43: Anything further? All right. Not seeing

02:04:43 Speaker 43: any further hands. I'll call the

02:04:44 Speaker 43: question. All those in favour? And

02:04:46 Speaker 43: that motion is carried. Thank you

02:04:47 Speaker 43: very much, Deputy Chief. We appreciate

02:04:48 Speaker 43: your introduction to that transition system.

02:04:50 Speaker 43: But the Director McNabb will hold

02:04:54 Speaker 43: on to you for one more

02:04:55 Speaker 43: for item seven D. It's recommended

02:04:57 Speaker 43: that report PSRCW0526 regarding the twenty.

02:04:59 Speaker 43: Regarding the 2025 Land Ambulance Service

02:05:02 Speaker 43: review results, be received for information.

02:05:04 Speaker 43: May I ask for a move

02:05:08 Speaker 43: in a second? Moved by Councillor

02:05:10 Speaker 43: Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Kevney. It's

02:05:12 Speaker 43: on the floor for discussion. Director

02:05:15 Speaker 43: McNab, the lectern is yours. Good

02:05:19 Speaker 43: morning again, Warden and County Council.

02:05:21 Speaker 43: Really happy to be here today

02:05:24 Speaker 43: to talk about this. The results

02:05:26 Speaker 43: of our last service review. Every

02:05:28 Speaker 43: three years, we go through a

02:05:30 Speaker 43: service review here. It lasts a

02:05:32 Speaker 43: couple of days and. the last

02:05:33 Speaker 43: one that took place was last

02:05:35 Speaker 43: October on the fifteenth and sixteenth.

02:05:36 Speaker 43: It's held by the or performed

02:05:37 Speaker 43: by the Ministry of Health Emergency

02:05:42 Speaker 43: Health Regulatory and Accountability Branch, and

02:05:44 Speaker 43: again they spend a couple days

02:05:46 Speaker 43: on site, more or less going

02:05:49 Speaker 43: through our entire service, looking at

02:05:51 Speaker 43: patient care, quality assurance, administration. Literally,

02:05:54 Speaker 43: I would say thousands of data

02:05:57 Speaker 43: points. They have a team

02:06:00 Speaker 43: lead, and then they have a

02:06:02 Speaker 43: management lead and a paramedic lead.

02:06:04 Speaker 43: They also bring somebody from fleet

02:06:07 Speaker 43: services from the ministry to look

02:06:08 Speaker 43: at our vehicles, and then they

02:06:10 Speaker 43: also bring paramedics to look at

02:06:12 Speaker 43: multiple factors from the bases to

02:06:16 Speaker 43: the vehicles to the. They go

02:06:19 Speaker 43: to the hospitals to look at

02:06:21 Speaker 43: patient care. They audit our ACRs,

02:06:22 Speaker 43: so they really go through all

02:06:24 Speaker 43: more or less every entity of

02:06:25 Speaker 43: the service delivery that we offer

02:06:26 Speaker 43: here, and they compare it to

02:06:27 Speaker 43: the standard and the regulations that

02:06:30 Speaker 43: we must follow to operate an

02:06:33 Speaker 43: ambulance service. So the Rio come,

02:06:34 Speaker 43: we met all the requirements from.

02:06:35 Speaker 43: We met all the requirements of

02:06:37 Speaker 43: the Ministry of Health Service Review,

02:06:39 Speaker 43: and we were recommended for a

02:06:41 Speaker 43: three-year extension of their of our

02:06:43 Speaker 43: licence, and that was in June

02:06:45 Speaker 43: of this year. We did get

02:06:47 Speaker 43: observations. There was nine in total.

02:06:50 Speaker 43: Four of them were around documentation.

02:06:52 Speaker 43: We also had an observation around

02:06:54 Speaker 43: deployment in regards to staffing and

02:06:55 Speaker 43: meeting the deployment plan. We had

02:06:58 Speaker 43: a paramedic that had an immunization.

02:06:59 Speaker 43: that was didn't have a signature

02:07:00 Speaker 43: on it, but was corrected. A

02:07:01 Speaker 43: paramedic that didn't have their ID

02:07:03 Speaker 43: on their person. It was a

02:07:04 Speaker 43: bit of a contention that was

02:07:05 Speaker 43: in their in her sweater and

02:07:06 Speaker 43: inside the base, but it wasn't

02:07:09 Speaker 43: on her person. But, anyways, was

02:07:11 Speaker 43: fine. Loose equipment behind the vehicles,

02:07:13 Speaker 43: gloves and stuff like that, and

02:07:14 Speaker 43: four, and then a couple around

02:07:16 Speaker 43: egress stickers and some certification documents

02:07:18 Speaker 43: that we just had to fix

02:07:21 Speaker 43: up. So the observations primarily relate

02:07:22 Speaker 43: to the staffing, documentation, and administrative

02:07:23 Speaker 43: processes. None of the observations prevented

02:07:25 Speaker 43: the renewal, and we submitted all

02:07:26 Speaker 43: our responses, corrected everything that was

02:07:28 Speaker 43: identified, mostly at the time, and

02:07:28 Speaker 43: then also over the period of

02:07:30 Speaker 43: time between the review of the

02:07:32 Speaker 43: summary report and the final report.

02:07:34 Speaker 43: We we built this the service

02:07:36 Speaker 43: here around the regulation and standards.

02:07:38 Speaker 43: Everything that we do revolves around.

02:07:49 Speaker 43: them. All our processes and all

02:07:50 Speaker 43: the things that we have in

02:07:52 Speaker 03: place are to meet them day

02:07:53 Speaker 03: in and day out. And I

02:07:56 Speaker 21: think that speaks to the work

02:07:57 Speaker 21: that the paramedics do, the supervisors,

02:08:00 Speaker 21: the managers, the administrative staff, and

02:08:02 Speaker 21: then also the support that comes

02:08:04 Speaker 21: from county council and the SMT

02:08:05 Speaker 21: and all the departments. Got to

02:08:06 Speaker 21: give a shout out to our

02:08:07 Speaker 21: maintenance staff that maintain our vehicles

02:08:11 Speaker 21: top notch and all our equipment.

02:08:13 Speaker 21: Do the testing on it, and

02:08:14 Speaker 21: then whether it's IT or finance

02:08:15 Speaker 21: or clerks, you know, that are

02:08:17 Speaker 21: Clerks, you know, their agreements. We

02:08:19 Speaker 21: touch almost every department in this

02:08:24 Speaker 10: county, and it makes a difference

02:08:29 Speaker 10: when it comes to the service

02:08:31 Speaker 10: review. There's a lot of work

02:08:32 Speaker 10: to get ready for it, but

02:08:35 Speaker 10: really, what it is is just

02:08:37 Speaker 10: looking at all the evidence that

02:08:39 Speaker 10: we do over the last three

02:08:42 Speaker 10: years to be able to show

02:08:44 Speaker 10: them all our processes and what

02:08:46 Speaker 10: we have in place. So, really

02:08:47 Speaker 10: happy for the team. It was

02:08:49 Speaker 10: very successful, even though we had

02:08:50 Speaker 10: some observations. But I would say

02:08:51 Speaker 10: it just an excellent job all

02:08:52 Speaker 10: around. So, and we we continue

02:08:54 Speaker 10: to learn from these observations. and

02:08:55 Speaker 10: put things in place to help

02:08:58 Speaker 10: shore it up. I don't know

02:08:59 Speaker 10: if we'll ever get rid of

02:09:00 Speaker 10: the documentation. I hope someday that

02:09:03 Speaker 10: we will, but I don't think

02:09:07 Speaker 10: so. So there's always going to

02:09:10 Speaker 10: be something that they'll find when

02:09:12 Speaker 10: they're auditing multiple data points on

02:09:14 Speaker 10: an ambulance call report. But again,

02:09:18 Speaker 10: we'll continue to to try to

02:09:21 Speaker 10: make that better each time, and

02:09:25 Speaker 10: make it a service that everybody's

02:09:26 Speaker 10: proud of. Thank you. very much,

02:09:29 Speaker 10: and thank you for highlighting that

02:09:33 Speaker 10: it it's it's a teamwork in

02:09:35 Speaker 10: progress to make sure that all

02:09:36 Speaker 10: the the various departments contribute to

02:09:39 Speaker 10: that success that you've that you've

02:09:41 Speaker 10: described. So congratulations to your participation,

02:09:43 Speaker 10: but thank you also for mentioning

02:09:45 Speaker 10: the other departments. I understand the

02:09:47 Speaker 10: deputy Cao would like to have

02:09:48 Speaker 10: a few words before I open

02:09:49 Speaker 10: it to committee. The whole members.

02:09:51 Speaker 10: Thank you very much, Madam Warden.

02:09:53 Speaker 10: So over the last year or

02:09:55 Speaker 10: so, as I've had the opportunity

02:09:58 Speaker 10: to work with with Kevin and

02:10:00 Speaker 10: members of Kevin's team, Kevin comes

02:10:02 Speaker 10: across as an incredibly quiet-spoken gentleman.

02:10:04 Speaker 10: He he effuses modesty when it

02:10:05 Speaker 10: comes to the service. We discussed

02:10:15 Speaker 10: whether or not to even put

02:10:17 Speaker 10: those nine things in. These are

02:10:18 Speaker 10: nine things where somebody had a

02:10:20 Speaker 10: a card in a sweater that

02:10:24 Speaker 21: wasn't on their person at the

02:10:28 Speaker 21: time. These are very very minor

02:10:29 Speaker 21: things that the team spent a

02:10:31 Speaker 21: week looking. for. I had

02:10:36 Speaker 21: the opportunity to delve in and

02:10:45 Speaker 55: meet the team that came in

02:10:46 Speaker 55: to start the inspection work, and

02:10:50 Speaker 55: I met them at the start

02:10:53 Speaker 43: and I met them at the

02:10:55 Speaker 43: end, and I saw the midway

02:10:57 Speaker 43: through. And midway through this room

02:11:00 Speaker 43: here, the table was covered from

02:11:02 Speaker 43: one end to the other with

02:11:03 Speaker 43: pieces of paper that they were

02:11:05 Speaker 43: slifting through and looking for things

02:11:06 Speaker 43: that the the team can improve

02:11:09 Speaker 43: on. Kevin leads an incredible team

02:11:11 Speaker 43: of of both his management team

02:11:13 Speaker 43: and the front line par. And

02:11:16 Speaker 43: the frontline paramedics do an outstanding

02:11:19 Speaker 43: body of work. This we present

02:11:20 Speaker 43: this report in in Kevin's modest

02:11:22 Speaker 43: tenure and tone, but this is

02:11:24 Speaker 43: a shining example of what Grey

02:11:26 Speaker 43: County does incredibly well. We have

02:11:28 Speaker 43: a paramedic team that, as a

02:11:30 Speaker 43: council, I am sure and I

02:11:33 Speaker 43: know you are proud of, and

02:11:36 Speaker 43: this report really does offer glowing

02:11:38 Speaker 43: praise for the work of Kevin.

02:11:39 Speaker 43: Kevin's management team, and every single

02:11:41 Speaker 43: one of our frontline paramedics that

02:11:43 Speaker 43: provide daily service inside and out

02:11:46 Speaker 43: to members of community at Gray

02:11:48 Speaker 43: County. And so, I'd like to

02:11:50 Speaker 43: offer my congratulations as well to

02:11:51 Speaker 43: Kevin on an outstanding job. And

02:11:54 Speaker 43: hopefully, I have been a little

02:11:56 Speaker 43: conveyed some of my enthusiasm for

02:11:58 Speaker 43: the work of Kevin and his

02:11:59 Speaker 43: team, and and tried to beat

02:12:00 Speaker 43: down some of Kevin's modesty on

02:12:03 Speaker 43: this one because it really is

02:12:04 Speaker 43: a triumph. Excellent, thank you. So

02:12:07 Speaker 43: let me open it up to

02:12:08 Speaker 43: the floor for questions or comments.

02:12:10 Speaker 43: We'll begin with alternate Councillor Cupcake.

02:12:11 Speaker 43: Thank you, Warden, and to you,

02:12:13 Speaker 43: Kevin. Congratulations as well, extended on

02:12:15 Speaker 43: your service that you do provide.

02:12:17 Speaker 43: My questions regarding the first observation

02:12:18 Speaker 43: deployment, staffing, and maintaining sufficient staff.

02:12:19 Speaker 43: How is that being handled? Staffing

02:12:21 Speaker 43: over the last five years, I'd

02:12:22 Speaker 43: say since COVID, has been difficult.

02:12:26 Speaker 43: Attracting staff, you know, getting staff

02:12:27 Speaker 43: to to work, you know, is

02:12:28 Speaker 43: still to meet the needs. The

02:12:31 Speaker 43: deployment plan, it has been tough.

02:12:33 Speaker 43: And so, when you look at

02:12:34 Speaker 43: the numbers, we're filling between ninety

02:12:36 Speaker 43: six to ninety seven percent of

02:12:39 Speaker 43: the shifts, but we're still not

02:12:40 Speaker 43: one hundred percent. We're still not

02:12:41 Speaker 43: 100. So, but so so, but

02:12:42 Speaker 43: we continue to work on that.

02:12:46 Speaker 43: The way we do things here,

02:12:48 Speaker 43: we have we offer overtime on

02:12:50 Speaker 43: areas where we have known where

02:12:51 Speaker 43: we sometimes have more absences, like

02:12:56 Speaker 43: on weekends. We, if we can,

02:12:58 Speaker 43: we upstaff ahead of time with

02:13:01 Speaker 56: some people to try to absorb

02:13:04 Speaker 56: those first number of book offs

02:13:05 Speaker 56: to be able to maintain. We

02:13:06 Speaker 56: can pull from our CP programme.

02:13:10 Speaker 56: We have supervisors that can work.

02:13:12 Speaker 21: We have on call that comes

02:13:14 Speaker 21: in. We have managers to back

02:13:17 Speaker 21: up. I came in at Christmas.

02:13:18 Speaker 21: You know, I mean, I just

02:13:20 Speaker 21: it's ongoing. I must say though,

02:13:21 Speaker 21: every year it gets better. We

02:13:24 Speaker 21: went through this in 2004. I

02:13:26 Speaker 21: would say it was probably worse

02:13:27 Speaker 21: then. We're coming out of it.

02:13:28 Speaker 21: It's not over yet. We're not

02:13:31 Speaker 21: like unlike other places. There may

02:13:34 Speaker 21: be some services in Ontario that

02:13:36 Speaker 21: aren't having trouble, but I would

02:13:38 Speaker 21: say most are still having trouble

02:13:39 Speaker 21: or or just coming. out of

02:13:42 Speaker 21: it as well. I just and

02:13:44 Speaker 21: also through this we've had growth,

02:13:47 Speaker 21: and I just kind of anticipated

02:13:49 Speaker 21: maybe a question around this, so

02:13:52 Speaker 21: I did write some numbers just

02:13:55 Speaker 21: to have available. Like so far

02:13:57 Speaker 21: this year, we're still sitting around

02:13:59 Speaker 21: ninety six and a half percent

02:14:01 Speaker 21: of the shifts that we're filling,

02:14:04 Speaker 21: three and a half that we're

02:14:10 Speaker 21: not. That equals to two hundred

02:14:13 Speaker 21: seventy four. But I go back

02:14:16 Speaker 21: in the last two years, we've

02:14:18 Speaker 21: added twenty five hundred and fifty

02:14:21 Speaker 21: five shifts, so we're still twenty

02:14:23 Speaker 21: two hundred more than we were.

02:14:26 Speaker 21: two years ago at this time

02:14:28 Speaker 21: when we had downsizing, so it

02:14:29 Speaker 21: is not fixed yet. But we

02:14:31 Speaker 21: are working on it. At one

02:14:35 Speaker 21: time, we used to only hire

02:14:39 Speaker 21: once a year, now we hire

02:14:41 Speaker 21: twice a year. But but each

02:14:45 Speaker 21: year gets better. And again, we

02:14:48 Speaker 21: have we. I would say we're

02:14:49 Speaker 21: coming out of it, but but

02:14:52 Speaker 21: we're not out of it yet.

02:14:55 Speaker 21: Okay. Thank you. Any further questions

02:14:57 Speaker 21: or comments? Okay. I'm not seeing

02:14:59 Speaker 21: any. further hands. All those in

02:15:02 Speaker 21: favour? That motion is carried. Thank

02:15:05 Speaker 21: you again, and thank you to

02:15:06 Speaker 21: all of your team. So with

02:15:09 Speaker 21: that, yes, appropriately, with ten minutes

02:15:13 Speaker 21: before we know our lunch is

02:15:15 Speaker 21: about to to arrive, I'm going

02:15:17 Speaker 21: to read out the recommended motion.

02:15:19 Speaker 21: That might take me five minutes

02:15:21 Speaker 21: because this one's a little bit

02:15:23 Speaker 21: long, and it's not a not

02:15:26 Speaker 21: a committee committee motion where I

02:15:29 Speaker 21: can refer to what's already been

02:15:32 Speaker 21: published. I think this one needs

02:15:34 Speaker 21: to be read for clarity. so

02:15:37 Speaker 21: it is recommended that report PDR

02:15:40 Speaker 21: CW thirty four twenty six be

02:15:42 Speaker 21: received and that the land exchange

02:15:44 Speaker 21: between the county and the township

02:15:46 Speaker 21: of Southgate for nominal consideration for

02:15:48 Speaker 21: the following lands abutting the CP

02:15:51 Speaker 21: rail trail in Dundalk be approved

02:15:53 Speaker 21: to align with the township

02:15:58 Speaker 21: of Southgate's long term plans for

02:15:59 Speaker 21: the section of Dundalk, the town,

02:16:00 Speaker 21: the county lands described as part

02:16:04 Speaker 21: of Lot two to nine concession

02:16:08 Speaker 21: two. nine concession two southwest of

02:16:10 Speaker 21: the Toronto and Sydney Road, being

02:16:13 Speaker 21: part one in the attached draft

02:16:16 Speaker 21: reference plan, be transferred to Southgate.

02:16:18 Speaker 21: The township lands described as part

02:16:20 Speaker 21: of lot two two nine concession

02:16:23 Speaker 30: two southwest of the Toronto and

02:16:24 Speaker 30: Sydney Road, being parts thirteen twelve

02:16:25 Speaker 30: and thirteen in the attached reference

02:16:27 Speaker 30: plan, be transferred to the county,

02:16:30 Speaker 30: and that the county waive the

02:16:32 Speaker 30: requirement for a bylaw to execute

02:16:34 Speaker 30: the land transfer agreement as set

02:16:37 Speaker 30: out in the county's sale of

02:16:39 Speaker 30: land procedure GGEN zero three zero

02:16:41 Speaker 30: zero three zero zero one and

02:16:44 Speaker 30: acquisition of land procedure GGEN zero

02:16:46 Speaker 30: zero three zero zero two and

02:16:48 Speaker 30: any successor thereto, and that the

02:16:50 Speaker 30: warden and clerk be authorised to

02:16:52 Speaker 30: execute the land exchange agreement once

02:16:55 Speaker 30: finalized, and that the staff be

02:16:57 Speaker 30: directed to incorporate language into the

02:16:58 Speaker 30: language the land exchange agreement to

02:17:00 Speaker 30: address the cost sharing arrangements between

02:17:01 Speaker 30: the county and Southgate that were

02:17:03 Speaker 30: previously outlined in the cost sharing

02:17:05 Speaker 30: agreement dated October 6, 2021, to

02:17:08 Speaker 30: the extent required based on the

02:17:10 Speaker 30: new long-term plans for this area

02:17:12 Speaker 30: of Dundalk, and that staff be

02:17:13 Speaker 30: directed to release various parcels of

02:17:16 Speaker 30: land from the cost sharing agreement

02:17:18 Speaker 30: registered in the land. Registry Office

02:17:20 Speaker 30: of Gray, number sixteen, as instrument

02:17:21 Speaker 30: GY two one five zero three

02:17:22 Speaker 30: zero, as deemed necessary to effect

02:17:24 Speaker 30: the long-term plans for this area

02:17:27 Speaker 30: of Dundalk, and deemed appropriate through

02:17:29 Speaker 30: consultation with the Director of Planning,

02:17:31 Speaker 30: CAO and Deputy CAO, and the

02:17:33 Speaker 30: County Solicitor, and that staff be

02:17:35 Speaker 30: authorised to carry out the above

02:17:37 Speaker 30: prior to the County Council approval,

02:17:39 Speaker 30: as per Section twenty six point

02:17:41 Speaker 30: six. Twenty-six point six B of

02:17:43 Speaker 30: our procedural bylaw fifty-one thirty-four twenty-two.

02:17:46 Speaker 30: May I ask for a mover

02:17:48 Speaker 30: and a second? er Moved by

02:17:49 Speaker 30: the deputy warden. Looking, yeah, that's

02:17:52 Speaker 30: right. Could you repeat that? And

02:17:54 Speaker 30: seconded by by Councillor Dobreen. It's

02:17:56 Speaker 30: now on the floor for discussion.

02:17:58 Speaker 30: Welcome, Director Taylor, to the lectern.

02:18:00 Speaker 30: Thanks, Madam Warden, and and this

02:18:02 Speaker 30: report was truly a team effort

02:18:04 Speaker 30: between Legal Services. clerks and planning,

02:18:06 Speaker 30: the downside of a team effort

02:18:08 Speaker 30: between legal services clerks and planning

02:18:11 Speaker 30: is you get emotion, like you

02:18:14 Speaker 30: just read. So, appreciate your patience.

02:18:18 Speaker 30: This is just very briefly following

02:18:19 Speaker 30: up on a past closed session

02:18:21 Speaker 30: discussion where staff received direction back

02:18:23 Speaker 30: in September 2025, and that was

02:18:25 Speaker 30: to work with Township of Southgate

02:18:27 Speaker 30: staff to investigate a potential land

02:18:29 Speaker 30: swap, if you will. And these

02:18:31 Speaker 30: lands are alongside the CP rail

02:18:34 Speaker 30: trail, as we talked about earlier

02:18:36 Speaker 30: in. council, rate in in downtown

02:18:37 Speaker 30: Dundalk, and essentially the county would

02:18:40 Speaker 30: be would be trading lands sort

02:18:43 Speaker 30: of on on the east side

02:18:45 Speaker 30: of the trail for lands on

02:18:47 Speaker 30: the west side of the trail

02:18:48 Speaker 30: with the township. And as some

02:18:50 Speaker 30: might recall, there was a land

02:18:52 Speaker 30: donation agreement done back in 2021

02:18:56 Speaker 30: when the township was looking at

02:18:58 Speaker 30: a new medical clinic in this

02:19:02 Speaker 30: area, and there were some commitments

02:19:04 Speaker 30: through that land donation agreement that

02:19:05 Speaker 30: that Southgate took on as part

02:19:08 Speaker 30: of that agreement. in speaking further

02:19:09 Speaker 30: with township staff, there are some

02:19:12 Speaker 30: of those commitments that are no

02:19:16 Speaker 30: longer relevant now that the medical

02:19:18 Speaker 30: clinic plans might be changed. And

02:19:20 Speaker 30: as such, through this this motion

02:19:24 Speaker 30: and this report, we're looking for

02:19:26 Speaker 30: some leeway to to release some

02:19:27 Speaker 30: of those commitments, but but still

02:19:29 Speaker 30: continue on with some, including some

02:19:32 Speaker 30: of the trail upgrades and and

02:19:33 Speaker 30: the the need for exploration of

02:19:35 Speaker 30: future parking in this area. Council

02:19:36 Speaker 30: may recall there was a further

02:19:37 Speaker 30: land sale to Midwest Co-op in

02:19:38 Speaker 30: 2024. That sale has been completed,

02:19:40 Speaker 30: and and the old mill building

02:19:40 Speaker 30: just near here has since been

02:19:44 Speaker 30: torn down. So Southgate staff took

02:19:46 Speaker 30: this this matter to their council

02:19:47 Speaker 30: on August 5th. At that time,

02:19:49 Speaker 21: Southgate staff outlined sort of the

02:19:53 Speaker 21: long term plans for this area,

02:19:57 Speaker 21: including a series of of potential

02:19:58 Speaker 21: changes between the county and township,

02:20:02 Speaker 21: which we're hearing about today, and

02:20:05 Speaker 27: also further discussions between the the

02:20:08 Speaker 27: township and and Midwest Co-op in

02:20:10 Speaker 27: that regard. With that report. township

02:20:14 Speaker 27: council supported this this land swap,

02:20:17 Speaker 27: and if you will, the the

02:20:19 Speaker 27: lands really are a like for

02:20:22 Speaker 27: like, and they're being traded in

02:20:25 Speaker 27: in an as is condition. The

02:20:28 Speaker 27: only reason why on map two

02:20:30 Speaker 27: the lands look slightly larger that

02:20:33 Speaker 27: the county is getting is because

02:20:40 Speaker 27: part twelve currently contains a small

02:20:42 Speaker 27: hydro easement. So in order for

02:20:44 Speaker 27: for the county to get a

02:20:48 Speaker 27: similar size parcel, which is part

02:20:50 Speaker 27: thirteen to part one, which they're

02:20:52 Speaker 57: trading, we we didn't. count those

02:20:54 Speaker 57: those hydro easement lands in the

02:20:57 Speaker 57: total, and then finally the reason

02:20:59 Speaker 57: for the motion being quite as

02:21:01 Speaker 57: long as it is is because

02:21:03 Speaker 57: we are coming up to the

02:21:05 Speaker 57: restricted acts deadline under the Municipal

02:21:07 Speaker 57: Act, and and to make sure

02:21:09 Speaker 57: we're we're keeping with with the

02:21:12 Speaker 57: legislative requirements in this regard, we've

02:21:15 Speaker 57: consulted with both the clerk and

02:21:18 Speaker 57: legal services, and as such, there's

02:21:19 Speaker 57: clauses in the in the motion

02:21:21 Speaker 57: which, if supported today, would allow

02:21:23 Speaker 57: for this this land transfer agreement

02:21:24 Speaker 57: or land exchange agreement to be

02:21:27 Speaker 57: finalized without the need for a

02:21:29 Speaker 57: bylaw coming back to council. There

02:21:31 Speaker 57: is documentation in the report, the

02:21:33 Speaker 57: direction under which staff would be

02:21:35 Speaker 57: would be negotiating that agreement. So

02:21:37 Speaker 57: if council supports this recommendation here

02:21:41 Speaker 57: today, it would it would simply

02:21:45 Speaker 57: not require that bylaw. With that,

02:21:46 Speaker 57: I am happy to turn it

02:21:48 Speaker 57: back to you, Madam Warden. But

02:21:49 Speaker 57: I just note that we have

02:21:52 Speaker 30: both the clerk and Ms. Lacey

02:21:54 Speaker 30: Thompson and in the back. Is

02:21:56 Speaker 30: Lacy Thompson in in the back?

02:21:57 Speaker 30: If there are any technical questions,

02:21:59 Speaker 30: thank you. Okay, thank you for

02:22:01 Speaker 30: that introduction. So, with that, I'll

02:22:03 Speaker 30: put it out to committee. The

02:22:06 Speaker 30: whole, any questions or comments? Okay,

02:22:07 Speaker 30: we'll go to Councillor Eccles. Just

02:22:08 Speaker 30: for clarity, the reason that we're

02:22:11 Speaker 30: not doing the bylaws because of

02:22:13 Speaker 30: lame duck period may or may

02:22:16 Speaker 30: not kick in, but if we

02:22:19 Speaker 30: did the motion today. to prepare

02:22:21 Speaker 30: the bylaw, would that not step

02:22:24 Speaker 30: ahead? That it was granted to

02:22:26 Speaker 30: be prepared before lame duck. I

02:22:27 Speaker 30: guess it's a timing issue. I

02:22:30 Speaker 30: just feel a little at ease

02:22:33 Speaker 30: that we do everything by bylaw,

02:22:35 Speaker 30: and yet on something that is

02:22:37 Speaker 30: at that time sensitive, that we

02:22:39 Speaker 30: need to bypass that procedure. Okay,

02:22:41 Speaker 30: so I think I'm going to

02:22:43 Speaker 30: begin with the quorum. I will

02:22:46 Speaker 30: start with Madam Quorum. Thank you,

02:22:49 Speaker 30: and to you, Madam Warden. As

02:22:50 Speaker 30: staff, I think we can relate

02:22:57 Speaker 30: to your somewhat discomfort in proceeding

02:22:58 Speaker 30: without a bylaw. However, my understanding

02:23:00 Speaker 30: is that this is a time-sensitive

02:23:01 Speaker 30: matter. But perhaps Director Taylor could

02:23:03 Speaker 21: elabourate on that a little bit.

02:23:04 Speaker 21: This is the last regular meeting

02:23:07 Speaker 21: that we have scheduled. for County

02:23:09 Speaker 21: Council before we may go into

02:23:14 Speaker 21: the lame duck position next Friday

02:23:16 Speaker 21: on the 21st, and the next

02:23:17 Speaker 21: meeting would be September 10th. So

02:23:18 Speaker 21: the bylaw would be the final

02:23:20 Speaker 21: step in that approval process, having

02:23:21 Speaker 21: it passed by County Council. And

02:23:23 Speaker 21: unfortunately, if we are in a

02:23:25 Speaker 21: lame duck position in September, that

02:23:28 Speaker 21: bylaw isn't able to be passed

02:23:31 Speaker 21: because it's one of the restricted

02:23:33 Speaker 21: acts in the Municipal Act. So

02:23:35 Speaker 21: this is the the last possible.

02:23:37 Speaker 21: time, staff we felt we could

02:23:41 Speaker 21: bring it forward and still fit

02:23:43 Speaker 21: the legislative framework that we're working

02:23:47 Speaker 21: with. Okay, Director Taylor, did you

02:23:49 Speaker 21: want to add anything to that?

02:23:52 Speaker 21: Sure, thank you, Madam. I don't

02:23:55 Speaker 21: have a lot to add here.

02:23:56 Speaker 21: I will say that that both

02:23:57 Speaker 21: the clerk and and legal services

02:23:58 Speaker 21: department were were very helpful in

02:23:59 Speaker 21: this, and we talked about

02:24:01 Speaker 21: all options, including would we schedule

02:24:03 Speaker 21: a separate county council meeting after

02:24:07 Speaker 21: this ahead of. ahead of that

02:24:12 Speaker 21: restricted acts period, in this case,

02:24:14 Speaker 21: the reason staff put this forward

02:24:15 Speaker 21: on the agenda day is because

02:24:18 Speaker 21: we had had that past full

02:24:21 Speaker 21: session discussion approximately a year ago,

02:24:23 Speaker 58: so September 2025, and we do

02:24:27 Speaker 58: understand in in talking with the

02:24:30 Speaker 58: the township that this is a

02:24:31 Speaker 58: small piece of of the larger

02:24:33 Speaker 58: plans for downtown Dundalk, some of

02:24:35 Speaker 58: which are time sensitive on their

02:24:38 Speaker 58: end. So while this might not

02:24:40 Speaker 58: be a extreme time sensitive

02:24:43 Speaker 58: priority to Time-sensitive priority to to

02:24:45 Speaker 58: the county of Gray. We think

02:24:46 Speaker 58: in in in working with the

02:24:48 Speaker 58: township as as a municipal partner,

02:24:50 Speaker 58: and certainly through the warden. Invite

02:24:50 Speaker 58: any comments from our our township

02:24:53 Speaker 58: of Southgate representatives here today. We

02:24:54 Speaker 58: thought it was best to to

02:24:55 Speaker 58: put this on on the agenda

02:24:58 Speaker 58: for council's consideration to to see

02:25:01 Speaker 58: to see the feedback here today.

02:25:03 Speaker 58: Okay. Anything else? All right. I

02:25:06 Speaker 58: don't see any further hands. Then

02:25:08 Speaker 58: you have the information. Then we

02:25:13 Speaker 58: have the information in front of

02:25:15 Speaker 58: us. I'll call the question. All

02:25:18 Speaker 58: those in favour, and that motion

02:25:20 Speaker 58: is carried. Thank you very much,

02:25:25 Speaker 58: Director Taylor, and Madam Clerk. I'll

02:25:27 Speaker 58: just consult with you in terms

02:25:29 Speaker 58: of timing. Okay, so at some

02:25:32 Speaker 58: point we will break for lunch

02:25:34 Speaker 58: when we know that it's arrived,

02:25:36 Speaker 58: but we're going to keep working

02:25:38 Speaker 58: until that happens. So with that,

02:25:42 Speaker 58: then I would like to go

02:25:43 Speaker 58: to item seven F, and it

02:25:45 Speaker 58: is recommended that staff report PDR

02:25:48 Speaker 58: CW twenty eight twenty six. W.2826

02:25:50 Speaker 58: regarding the pursuit of an upper

02:25:52 Speaker 58: tier community improvement plan for Gray

02:25:56 Speaker 58: County be received, and that the

02:25:59 Speaker 58: committee, the whole hereby direct staff

02:26:01 Speaker 58: to add the county CIP

02:26:03 Speaker 58: as a project within the ten-year

02:26:06 Speaker 58: capital budget from 2027 to 2036

02:26:09 Speaker 58: for the planning department to include

02:26:11 Speaker 58: it within the development charges background

02:26:13 Speaker 58: study, and we'll hear from Senior

02:26:14 Speaker 58: Policy Planner Buckton in just a

02:26:15 Speaker 58: moment. I'll ask for a move.

02:26:17 Speaker 58: A moment. I'll ask for a

02:26:19 Speaker 58: mover and a seconder to get

02:26:22 Speaker 58: it on the floor. We've got

02:26:24 Speaker 58: it moved by Councillor Dobrines, seconded

02:26:26 Speaker 58: by alternate Councillor Kepke. It's now

02:26:29 Speaker 58: on the floor for discussion. Welcome.

02:26:31 Speaker 58: What might be just ahead of

02:26:34 Speaker 58: lunch? Thank you so very much.

02:26:35 Speaker 58: The listeners are going to get

02:26:37 Speaker 58: a reputation here, right? Thank you

02:26:39 Speaker 58: so much. Really glad to be

02:26:41 Speaker 58: here today. Are you able to

02:26:44 Speaker 58: control that for me, Erin? Or

02:26:46 Speaker 58: yep, okay. amazing. Thank you. So

02:26:49 Speaker 58: we will be brief in the

02:26:52 Speaker 58: event that lunch just arrives the

02:26:56 Speaker 58: second I started talking. There is

02:26:58 Speaker 58: Murphy's law, and dictates. So we'll

02:27:00 Speaker 58: we'll jump right in. So as

02:27:04 Speaker 58: you noted, the report focuses around

02:27:06 Speaker 58: community improvement plans and and contemplating

02:27:08 Speaker 58: a plan for Gray County at

02:27:10 Speaker 58: the upper tier level. I thought

02:27:12 Speaker 58: I'd better start where where we

02:27:13 Speaker 58: usually need to start, which is

02:27:16 Speaker 58: what is a community improvement plan.

02:27:19 Speaker 58: I think those around this table

02:27:23 Speaker 58: will know. but for anybody else

02:27:26 Speaker 58: who may be watching or or

02:27:27 Speaker 58: listening in, a community improvement plan

02:27:28 Speaker 58: is a flexible tool under the

02:27:30 Speaker 58: Planning Act that allows municipalities to

02:27:32 Speaker 58: offer targeted incentives to support various

02:27:34 Speaker 58: different community projects or outcomes. Oftentimes,

02:27:37 Speaker 58: there are prohibitions, for example, within

02:27:40 Speaker 58: the Municipal Act around bonusing or

02:27:42 Speaker 58: or providing incentives, but this tool

02:27:46 Speaker 58: creates the framework within which we

02:27:47 Speaker 58: we can do so. legally, and

02:27:48 Speaker 58: so various different programme types can

02:27:50 Speaker 58: can be part of a community

02:27:53 Speaker 58: improvement plan. I know that councillors

02:27:54 Speaker 58: are familiar with the tax increment

02:27:57 Speaker 58: equivalent grants, and we've seen some

02:27:59 Speaker 58: of those at planning level in

02:28:01 Speaker 58: conjunction with lower tier CIP initiatives.

02:28:03 Speaker 58: There's a variety of other tools

02:28:05 Speaker 58: that can be enacted through CIPs,

02:28:06 Speaker 58: such as grants and loans, and

02:28:08 Speaker 58: the CIP document itself outlines the

02:28:12 Speaker 58: criteria. that would apply for eligibility

02:28:14 Speaker 58: and the programme itself. So the

02:28:16 Speaker 58: county has, since 2019, administered a

02:28:19 Speaker 58: countywide CAP programme, but that has

02:28:21 Speaker 58: been implemented through member municipalities and

02:28:23 Speaker 58: their local official plans. So up

02:28:25 Speaker 58: until just recently, upper tier

02:28:28 Speaker 58: municipalities required to be prescribed to

02:28:30 Speaker 58: have an upper tier CAP, and

02:28:32 Speaker 58: I might be getting a little

02:28:35 Speaker 58: ahead of myself, a slide or

02:28:37 Speaker 58: two, but that has changed with

02:28:40 Speaker 58: Bill 60, and we can now.

02:28:42 Speaker 58: have an upper tier plan. So

02:28:44 Speaker 58: through the existing programme, the county

02:28:47 Speaker 58: has supported local municipalities with the

02:28:50 Speaker 58: CIP programme design. We've provided a

02:28:52 Speaker 58: templated document, kind of outlining how

02:28:53 Speaker 58: those CIPs might be structured. We've

02:28:55 Speaker 58: supported with some coordination and monitoring,

02:28:58 Speaker 58: and I know Savannah's team keeps

02:29:01 Speaker 58: some stats and does reporting back

02:29:03 Speaker 58: to town council around our participation

02:29:05 Speaker 58: with those programmemes as well. And

02:29:06 Speaker 58: we have offered and and and

02:29:09 Speaker 58: do offer aligned heritage tax rebates.

02:29:12 Speaker 58: and tax incremental equivalent grants, again

02:29:13 Speaker 58: for those local CIPs supported projects.

02:29:15 Speaker 58: As I noted, there has been

02:29:20 Speaker 58: changes to legislation that would allow

02:29:21 Speaker 58: for upper tier CIPs to to

02:29:23 Speaker 58: or sort of upper tier municipalities

02:29:26 Speaker 58: to have CIPs, but it is

02:29:27 Speaker 58: a scoped list of matters that

02:29:29 Speaker 58: those upper tier CIPs can address.

02:29:31 Speaker 58: So I've just listed those here

02:29:33 Speaker 58: on the slide, but would highlight

02:29:35 Speaker 58: affordable housing as being one. of

02:29:37 Speaker 58: those items in particular, also including

02:29:38 Speaker 58: infrastructure and lands and buildings with

02:29:40 Speaker 58: respect to transit corridors. So, also

02:29:42 Speaker 58: on the screen, we've got a

02:29:45 Speaker 58: lovely image there of the housing

02:29:47 Speaker 58: action plan. So that had been

02:29:48 Speaker 58: endorsed by County Council in 2023,

02:29:49 Speaker 58: and within that document, there is

02:29:54 Speaker 58: a stated intent to maintain those

02:29:56 Speaker 58: CIP-related incentives to support the local

02:29:59 Speaker 58: municipalities and to look at upper-tier

02:30:02 Speaker 58: complementary programmemes. When that plan was

02:30:04 Speaker 58: written, we didn't have the ability

02:30:05 Speaker 58: at that point in time to

02:30:07 Speaker 58: have an efforts here CIP. Although

02:30:10 Speaker 58: there had been interim reports over

02:30:13 Speaker 58: the past couple of years that

02:30:14 Speaker 58: have contemplated that idea, we had

02:30:17 Speaker 58: been seeking some direction to reach

02:30:19 Speaker 58: out to the province to determine

02:30:21 Speaker 58: how to be prescribed for a

02:30:23 Speaker 58: CIP around the time that Bill

02:30:25 Speaker 58: sixty was enacted and put that

02:30:26 Speaker 58: permission in place at any ease.

02:30:29 Speaker 58: So you know, I think CIPs

02:30:31 Speaker 58: are. are nimble tools. We can

02:30:33 Speaker 58: tailor it the way that that

02:30:34 Speaker 58: would be helpful for us. But

02:30:36 Speaker 58: through that lens of of applications

02:30:39 Speaker 58: to housing, I do think that

02:30:41 Speaker 58: a county CIP could really support

02:30:43 Speaker 58: that strategic targeting of incentives towards

02:30:44 Speaker 58: projects that we think are are

02:30:45 Speaker 58: needed to develop that more balanced

02:30:48 Speaker 58: housing mix. I think the market

02:30:50 Speaker 58: is definitely delivering the housing that

02:30:51 Speaker 58: the market can, but affordable housing

02:30:53 Speaker 58: in particular is very difficult. to

02:30:58 Speaker 58: pencil out, and not all creators

02:31:00 Speaker 58: of affordable housing have access to

02:31:02 Speaker 58: readily available capital or financial tools

02:31:03 Speaker 58: very early in their processes. And

02:31:06 Speaker 58: so, I think there could be

02:31:08 Speaker 58: some strategy around where we could

02:31:11 Speaker 58: place those incentives in the process

02:31:13 Speaker 58: to support those housing types we

02:31:15 Speaker 58: need. I think that CAP could

02:31:17 Speaker 58: create greater ease and flexibility as

02:31:21 Speaker 58: well for use of surplus municipal

02:31:23 Speaker 58: lands and partnerships around those lands.

02:31:26 Speaker 58: There are some provisions. within a

02:31:27 Speaker 58: CAP programme that you could create

02:31:30 Speaker 58: to allow for reduced cost transfers

02:31:33 Speaker 58: of lands, for example, for for

02:31:35 Speaker 58: projects. Could be looking again at

02:31:37 Speaker 58: targeting and filling those gaps in

02:31:40 Speaker 58: the other early funding opportunities to

02:31:41 Speaker 58: try and bring life to those

02:31:43 Speaker 58: projects that might otherwise struggle in

02:31:45 Speaker 58: the early phases. And then I

02:31:48 Speaker 58: think there is a great opportunity

02:31:49 Speaker 58: to to be looking at the

02:31:53 Speaker 58: at upper tier CAP in the

02:31:55 Speaker 58: context of there also being lower

02:31:58 Speaker 58: tier CAPs and. Lower tier CIPs,

02:32:00 Speaker 58: and how does that work together,

02:32:01 Speaker 58: and how do we tailor the

02:32:04 Speaker 58: staffing around the CIP and incentives?

02:32:06 Speaker 58: And so, I think there's a

02:32:08 Speaker 58: great opportunity to figure out how

02:32:11 Speaker 58: do we design that so that

02:32:12 Speaker 58: we can work together. So, we're

02:32:14 Speaker 58: bringing this forward not with a

02:32:19 Speaker 58: CIP prepared and ready to go,

02:32:20 Speaker 58: but suggesting that if if council

02:32:22 Speaker 58: would have an interest in pursuing

02:32:23 Speaker 58: an upper tier CIP, now might

02:32:25 Speaker 58: be an opportune time to. express

02:32:26 Speaker 58: that intent. We are undertaking the

02:32:28 Speaker 58: development charges background study, and so

02:32:30 Speaker 58: our thought was that if we

02:32:33 Speaker 58: were to receive endorsement to place

02:32:35 Speaker 58: this on the capital ten-year plan,

02:32:37 Speaker 58: we could be including some related

02:32:38 Speaker 58: costs within that development charges background

02:32:40 Speaker 58: study for funding at that future

02:32:43 Speaker 58: date when we pick up this

02:32:45 Speaker 58: project to move forward. We're anticipating,

02:32:46 Speaker 58: as well, from an alignment standpoint,

02:32:49 Speaker 58: that next year is likely the

02:32:51 Speaker 58: year that we'll be getting into

02:32:53 Speaker 58: an update to the. county official

02:32:55 Speaker 58: plan and beginning that process, and

02:32:57 Speaker 58: so we'll also be getting census

02:33:01 Speaker 58: data next year as well. And

02:33:03 Speaker 58: so I think there's potentially some

02:33:05 Speaker 58: alignment to be looking at the

02:33:07 Speaker 58: policy framework, updated data that might

02:33:09 Speaker 58: help us target that CIP and

02:33:10 Speaker 58: be thinking about where that CIP

02:33:13 Speaker 58: then ultimately goes in terms of

02:33:14 Speaker 58: design when we get there. So

02:33:17 Speaker 58: I have suggested within the report

02:33:19 Speaker 58: that I think there are some

02:33:22 Speaker 58: things that we do need to

02:33:25 Speaker 58: do in considering. a plan at

02:33:26 Speaker 58: the upper tier level. I've suggested

02:33:28 Speaker 58: that we phase this project in

02:33:30 Speaker 58: in the following ways. So, first

02:33:32 Speaker 58: off, starting with some analysis of

02:33:35 Speaker 58: those background data trends, needs, and

02:33:37 Speaker 58: gaps. The evaluation then of capacity

02:33:39 Speaker 58: considerations. So, who's delivering it at

02:33:41 Speaker 58: the county level? Staff resources.

02:33:44 Speaker 58: You know, all of the people

02:33:47 Speaker 58: that touch that, making sure that

02:33:50 Speaker 58: that we're adequately resourced, and then

02:33:53 Speaker 58: the actual development. of the

02:33:55 Speaker 58: programme itself, right through to the

02:33:58 Speaker 58: delivery of that bylaw for implementation.

02:34:00 Speaker 58: As what we've suggested within the

02:34:02 Speaker 58: financial section of the report is

02:34:04 Speaker 58: that we would look at likely

02:34:05 Speaker 58: those items A and B being

02:34:09 Speaker 58: an in-house activity where staff is

02:34:11 Speaker 58: doing that investigation and targeting, and

02:34:13 Speaker 58: then potentially engaging some consulting resources

02:34:14 Speaker 58: to help with the actual programme

02:34:16 Speaker 58: design. There are CIPs across Ontario,

02:34:18 Speaker 58: and so our thought is that

02:34:19 Speaker 58: there may be some. opportunities to

02:34:21 Speaker 58: to glean from those consultants some

02:34:22 Speaker 58: of those examples we may haven't

02:34:24 Speaker 58: engaged with elsewhere, but also then

02:34:26 Speaker 58: and being able to bring that

02:34:30 Speaker 58: in as a cost for some

02:34:32 Speaker 58: cost recovery through the development charges

02:34:36 Speaker 58: on a consulting basis. Um, in

02:34:38 Speaker 58: designing the CIP, and again, just

02:34:41 Speaker 58: a little foreshadowing of where we

02:34:42 Speaker 58: think we might go if council

02:34:43 Speaker 58: were on board, um, you know,

02:34:45 Speaker 58: we would really want to be

02:34:46 Speaker 58: considering those types of projects and

02:34:51 Speaker 58: organisations that. could be incented through

02:34:52 Speaker 58: that programme, we would want to

02:34:57 Speaker 58: use data-informed approaches because I think

02:35:03 Speaker 59: resources are limited all around, and

02:35:07 Speaker 59: so we'd want to be putting

02:35:09 Speaker 54: those incentives towards the specific projects

02:35:12 Speaker 54: that need that help. We'd want

02:35:16 Speaker 54: to direct the incentives towards the

02:35:19 Speaker 54: most impactful stage of development,

02:35:23 Speaker 54: and then look at scaling of

02:35:25 Speaker 54: those incentives. So, you know, I

02:35:31 Speaker 54: think the juice needs to be

02:35:33 Speaker 54: worth the squeeze for those development

02:35:35 Speaker 54: proponents. So, you know, if it's

02:35:38 Speaker 54: a matching fund grant, capping out

02:35:40 Speaker 54: at you know seven thousand dollars

02:35:44 Speaker 54: on a forty million dollar housing

02:35:47 Speaker 54: project, that's a very small drop

02:35:49 Speaker 54: in the bucket. But if we

02:35:52 Speaker 54: were able to offer a slightly

02:35:57 Speaker 54: more meaningful incentive at a key

02:35:58 Speaker 58: stage where there aren't other resources,

02:35:59 Speaker 58: we see you know being able

02:36:02 Speaker 58: to match the scale with that

02:36:04 Speaker 58: usability or or interest by the

02:36:06 Speaker 58: developers to take that. And then

02:36:08 Speaker 58: again, looking at that alignment with

02:36:10 Speaker 58: the. local CIPs, so I just

02:36:11 Speaker 58: wanted to mention here that

02:36:14 Speaker 58: we have had various discussions with

02:36:17 Speaker 58: local staff, and so we'd had

02:36:21 Speaker 58: a chat with UDOs earlier in

02:36:23 Speaker 58: the year, and I guess my

02:36:24 Speaker 58: takeaway from that was each of

02:36:27 Speaker 58: our municipalities is very differently resourced

02:36:29 Speaker 58: with capacity to deliver the CIPs,

02:36:32 Speaker 58: and so those types of initiatives

02:36:34 Speaker 58: that have agreements or monitoring conditions

02:36:36 Speaker 58: over time, like affordability conditions, that.

02:36:38 Speaker 58: Affordability conditions—that type of thing—may be

02:36:39 Speaker 58: challenging to accommodate in that that

02:36:41 Speaker 58: local resourcing. So again, there might

02:36:43 Speaker 58: be that opportunity to explore, you

02:36:44 Speaker 58: know, what tools are sitting in

02:36:47 Speaker 58: the county CIP versus the local.

02:36:49 Speaker 58: How are those working together? Maybe

02:36:50 Speaker 58: the the county is, you know,

02:36:52 Speaker 58: biting off a bigger chunk with

02:36:54 Speaker 58: those affordable housing ones, which allows

02:36:56 Speaker 58: the locals to focus a little

02:36:59 Speaker 58: more on, ah, dev or those

02:37:00 Speaker 58: types of initiatives. So just to

02:37:03 Speaker 58: say that I think there's a

02:37:04 Speaker 58: conversation there that we could explore.

02:37:06 Speaker 58: There that we explore around, you

02:37:08 Speaker 58: know, how we want to align

02:37:09 Speaker 58: those those CIPs. So just back

02:37:11 Speaker 58: to the beginning, the staff recommendation.

02:37:13 Speaker 58: So as noted, we provided a

02:37:15 Speaker 58: report that outlines all of this

02:37:18 Speaker 58: information, and our staff recommendation would

02:37:21 Speaker 58: be that we would proceed to

02:37:23 Speaker 58: put this on the capital plan

02:37:25 Speaker 58: and into the development charges background

02:37:31 Speaker 58: study. It's not just me there.

02:37:34 Speaker 58: Thank you. Thank you. So with

02:37:36 Speaker 58: that, I will look to committee.

02:37:41 Speaker 58: The whole members for questions or

02:37:44 Speaker 34: comments. Councillor Dobrin. Thank you, Warden,

02:37:46 Speaker 34: and thank you, Ms. I read

02:37:47 Speaker 34: this with great interest, and I

02:37:51 Speaker 34: know that at previously the county

02:37:53 Speaker 34: was looking at doing a land

02:37:54 Speaker 34: inventory to see which lands might

02:37:56 Speaker 34: be available for. affordable housing development

02:37:58 Speaker 34: that we could partner with other

02:38:00 Speaker 34: organisations. Would that land inventory play

02:38:03 Speaker 34: a role in this community improvement

02:38:06 Speaker 34: plan, as opposed to a financial

02:38:08 Speaker 34: incentive? There would be that that

02:38:08 Speaker 34: transfer of land or land lease

02:38:10 Speaker 34: or that type of thing. Thank

02:38:14 Speaker 34: you, and through through you, Madam

02:38:15 Speaker 34: Warden. Yes, so you know, I

02:38:17 Speaker 34: think. there are some interesting

02:38:19 Speaker 34: rules around municipal lands and associated

02:38:21 Speaker 34: marketing, and so you have to

02:38:24 Speaker 34: be of the same organisation to

02:38:26 Speaker 34: be able to do marketing for

02:38:28 Speaker 34: lands within your municipal ownership. So

02:38:28 Speaker 34: there's some some legislative rules around

02:38:30 Speaker 34: that, and so I think one

02:38:31 Speaker 34: of the ways that a CIP

02:38:32 Speaker 34: can can assist is where you

02:38:34 Speaker 34: do have those surplus lands inventoryed

02:38:35 Speaker 34: as as potential opportunities for affordable

02:38:38 Speaker 34: housing. Sorry, Lisa. If we did.

02:38:40 Speaker 34: get a proposal come in where

02:38:41 Speaker 34: you know somebody wanted to to

02:38:43 Speaker 34: uptake one of those surplus properties

02:38:44 Speaker 34: under the Municipal Act, you'd normally

02:38:45 Speaker 34: be dealing with kind of market

02:38:50 Speaker 34: rate or for those lands or

02:38:51 Speaker 34: an appraised value. Under a CIP,

02:38:52 Speaker 34: where you're looking at community-based objectives

02:38:53 Speaker 34: that you're trying to achieve, and

02:38:55 Speaker 34: you can place conditions and agreements

02:38:57 Speaker 34: around that, you may be able

02:38:58 Speaker 34: to transfer those lands at a

02:39:00 Speaker 34: low market rate. So as part

02:39:02 Speaker 34: of a portfolio, a Part of

02:39:05 Speaker 58: a portfolio of a partnership or

02:39:06 Speaker 58: or an agreement in that way.

02:39:09 Speaker 58: So I think those two tools

02:39:12 Speaker 58: work really well together, hand in

02:39:14 Speaker 58: hand. And as well, there are

02:39:15 Speaker 58: some provisions that allow for transfer

02:39:17 Speaker 58: between organisations as well. So, you

02:39:20 Speaker 58: know, if a local municipality, for

02:39:22 Speaker 58: example, was partnering with the county,

02:39:24 Speaker 58: you know, could we transfer those

02:39:24 Speaker 58: lands and deal with them at

02:39:26 Speaker 58: below market rate? We would both

02:39:28 Speaker 58: then have the ability to kind

02:39:31 Speaker 58: of play in that same sandbox.

02:39:33 Speaker 58: Whereas right now, the county is

02:39:35 Speaker 58: limited in that regard. whereas the

02:39:36 Speaker 58: CIP power sits with the local

02:39:39 Speaker 58: municipalities in dealing those lands that

02:39:40 Speaker 58: way. So, yes, and I think

02:39:41 Speaker 58: big opportunity to explore that even

02:39:43 Speaker 58: further. Thank you. Okay, anything else,

02:39:44 Speaker 30: Councillor Nielsen? Thank you very much,

02:39:46 Speaker 30: Ward Matrosov. I'm just trying to

02:39:49 Speaker 30: wrap my head around the DC

02:39:51 Speaker 30: combination. So, the report is suggesting

02:39:53 Speaker 30: that. if we incorporate the county

02:39:55 Speaker 30: CIP into the DC study, we

02:39:57 Speaker 30: can use DC study funds—sorry, DC

02:39:59 Speaker 30: funds—to fund the study to build

02:40:01 Speaker 30: and implement the CIP, but not

02:40:02 Speaker 30: actually fund the CIP once it's

02:40:03 Speaker 30: constructed. I guess I have two

02:40:05 Speaker 30: questions, kind of on how that

02:40:08 Speaker 30: might work. One is what the

02:40:11 Speaker 30: possible impact is into the DC

02:40:13 Speaker 30: charges itself, as in, like, how

02:40:14 Speaker 30: much are we thinking it's going

02:40:17 Speaker 30: to cost to build the study

02:40:19 Speaker 30: out, and two would be with

02:40:21 Speaker 30: I don't know if it's kind

02:40:24 Speaker 30: of died down, but there's still

02:40:26 Speaker 30: the provincial and federal comments around

02:40:29 Speaker 30: development charges and and just wondering

02:40:30 Speaker 30: if there's concern about we're trying

02:40:34 Speaker 30: to add extra studies into the

02:40:36 Speaker 30: development charges while at the same

02:40:39 Speaker 30: time the province and the feds

02:40:41 Speaker 30: are really trying to say you

02:40:43 Speaker 30: shouldn't have development charges or you

02:40:45 Speaker 30: should limit them. And I'm just

02:40:46 Speaker 30: trying to understand that correlation and

02:40:48 Speaker 30: just how this might work for

02:40:51 Speaker 30: the CIP. Where like I I

02:40:53 Speaker 30: fully support the concept of using

02:40:55 Speaker 30: the CIP. building it out, and

02:40:56 Speaker 30: funding it so we can support

02:40:57 Speaker 30: affordable housing, but it's kind of

02:41:00 Speaker 30: tricky to mean just how we're

02:41:03 Speaker 30: using that through development charges portion.

02:41:06 Speaker 30: Through you, and so I think

02:41:09 Speaker 30: I may bite off the first

02:41:10 Speaker 30: chunk of that, and then I

02:41:13 Speaker 30: might look back to Scott to

02:41:15 Speaker 30: take a bit on on that

02:41:18 Speaker 30: as well. So, in terms of

02:41:19 Speaker 30: impact to DC, so I think

02:41:21 Speaker 30: what we've identified within the report

02:41:23 Speaker 30: was you're marking about fifty thousand

02:41:25 Speaker 30: dollars for that kind of part

02:41:26 Speaker 30: C and D of of the

02:41:28 Speaker 30: work plan. it's a ballpark, right?

02:41:29 Speaker 30: We're we're trying to kind of

02:41:34 Speaker 30: get a good sense of of

02:41:36 Speaker 30: where we might land for a

02:41:39 Speaker 60: consultant to to engage with us.

02:41:42 Speaker 60: So, fifty thousand dollars is fifty

02:41:44 Speaker 60: thousand dollars, right? It may have

02:41:47 Speaker 60: an impact, but I just to

02:41:50 Speaker 48: give you a good idea of

02:41:53 Speaker 48: scale, and then I'll turn my

02:41:54 Speaker 48: mic off and and pass it

02:41:57 Speaker 48: over to Director Hill. Yeah, thanks,

02:42:01 Speaker 48: Liz, and and through Madam Warden

02:42:06 Speaker 48: to Councillor Nielsen. So we are

02:42:08 Speaker 48: working with Hemson right now on

02:42:11 Speaker 48: our development charges. Right now, on

02:42:14 Speaker 48: our development charge background study, and

02:42:17 Speaker 48: and because the county has never

02:42:20 Speaker 48: had the ability to do a

02:42:22 Speaker 48: CAP before, as Liz said,

02:42:25 Speaker 48: until Bill sixty, you know, one

02:42:27 Speaker 48: of the first questions early on

02:42:29 Speaker 48: was, is this something that that

02:42:31 Speaker 48: that we could charge DCs for?

02:42:33 Speaker 48: And what Hempson shared in that

02:42:35 Speaker 48: regard is, is a portion of

02:42:36 Speaker 48: it would be DC eligible. With

02:42:40 Speaker 48: any development charge, you need to

02:42:41 Speaker 48: look at what is the growth

02:42:44 Speaker 48: related aspect of that. So so

02:42:47 Speaker 48: it might not be the entire

02:42:49 Speaker 48: fifty thousand, but but we could

02:42:52 Speaker 48: we could work with Hempson to

02:42:56 Speaker 48: establish. Work with Hempton to establish

02:42:59 Speaker 48: that calculation. But when you're doing

02:43:01 Speaker 48: your development charges background study, simply

02:43:03 Speaker 48: put, it's it's not a wish

02:43:06 Speaker 48: list, and and it's definitely not

02:43:09 Speaker 48: a staff wish list. There has

02:43:10 Speaker 48: to be intent through previous master

02:43:12 Speaker 48: plans, or capital budgets, or capital

02:43:14 Speaker 48: plans in that regard that council

02:43:18 Speaker 48: has endorsed before we can even

02:43:20 Speaker 48: consider it in in the the

02:43:25 Speaker 48: background study. And that background study

02:43:27 Speaker 48: is is sort of the complex

02:43:29 Speaker 48: analysis you go through to to

02:43:31 Speaker 48: provide. in this case the future

02:43:33 Speaker 48: council the information of of what

02:43:34 Speaker 48: the county development charges would be

02:43:36 Speaker 48: starting in in you know later

02:43:39 Speaker 48: in twenty seven and and beyond

02:43:42 Speaker 48: kind of thing and council has

02:43:44 Speaker 48: the option of of adopting a

02:43:45 Speaker 48: bylaw with those charges or going

02:43:46 Speaker 48: with lesser charges so if council

02:43:48 Speaker 48: were to support this recommendation today

02:43:51 Speaker 48: essentially what it would allow staff

02:43:52 Speaker 48: to do is to go back

02:43:54 Speaker 48: to Hemson and said yes council

02:43:55 Speaker 48: is is interested in a development

02:43:57 Speaker 48: charges in a upper tier community

02:43:58 Speaker 48: improvement plan, we would include a

02:44:02 Speaker 48: portion of that cost of the

02:44:04 Speaker 48: fifty thousand in the background study,

02:44:06 Speaker 48: and and then that background study

02:44:11 Speaker 48: would ultimately come back to to

02:44:12 Speaker 48: council for for their approval. The

02:44:14 Speaker 48: project would have to be added

02:44:17 Speaker 48: in future years' capital budgets as

02:44:20 Speaker 48: well. So you know, although this

02:44:21 Speaker 48: is an early preview to council,

02:44:26 Speaker 48: this isn't sort of council committing

02:44:28 Speaker 48: a hundred percent. There still be

02:44:33 Speaker 48: that opportunity to reassess down the

02:44:36 Speaker 48: road. Sorry for the long winded

02:44:40 Speaker 48: answer. For the long-winded answer. Excellent,

02:44:42 Speaker 61: good teamwork. We'll go to Councillor

02:44:45 Speaker 61: Greg. I guess I just need

02:44:49 Speaker 61: a little bit more clarity, Liz,

02:44:51 Speaker 61: on where we're at. The report

02:44:52 Speaker 61: does state maintain, and there's an

02:44:54 Speaker 61: enhancement component in the same sentence.

02:44:58 Speaker 61: I just heard in the past

02:44:59 Speaker 61: the county was not in the

02:45:01 Speaker 61: position to do CIP programme, but

02:45:03 Speaker 61: the report clearly states maintain.

02:45:06 Speaker 61: So, have we been in there?

02:45:09 Speaker 61: I'm concerned with it's very simple,

02:45:11 Speaker 61: fifty thousand dollars. But as a

02:45:12 Speaker 61: project within the ten-year capital budget,

02:45:14 Speaker 61: what does this morph to? I

02:45:19 Speaker 61: find there is somewhat of a

02:45:20 Speaker 61: lack of clarity. It's a little

02:45:21 Speaker 61: bit dreamy. The aspirations, whereas engineering

02:45:22 Speaker 61: services could say, if you don't

02:45:24 Speaker 61: invest in that bridge. it's going

02:45:27 Speaker 61: to collapse. Or housing is if

02:45:30 Speaker 61: you don't fix that elevator, your

02:45:33 Speaker 61: senior residences are walking up four

02:45:34 Speaker 61: flights of stairs, and you don't

02:45:36 Speaker 61: want that. I'm not sure where

02:45:38 Speaker 61: this is going. And as

02:45:40 Speaker 61: long as we're delivering

02:45:42 Speaker 61: four, five, six, seven plus two,

02:45:43 Speaker 61: two point five percent in growth

02:45:45 Speaker 61: every year in tax increases, I

02:45:46 Speaker 61: heard you say it. Resources are

02:45:48 Speaker 61: limited, but if we're delivering. five,

02:45:50 Speaker 61: six, seven plus growth every year,

02:45:52 Speaker 61: we're not acknowledging that resources are

02:45:55 Speaker 61: limited for people. That's those are

02:45:58 Speaker 61: tax increases that are not sustainable,

02:46:00 Speaker 61: and that's where we've been at,

02:46:03 Speaker 61: and that's where we're currently projecting

02:46:06 Speaker 61: ourselves. So I'd like to hear

02:46:09 Speaker 61: more clarity, I guess, on what

02:46:11 Speaker 61: is the vision here, because I

02:46:13 Speaker 61: the report right now I'm concerned

02:46:15 Speaker 61: with we can't afford a. grandiose

02:46:17 Speaker 61: vision that's not coming through in

02:46:20 Speaker 61: in the pages here yet. I

02:46:23 Speaker 61: also we do. I think as

02:46:25 Speaker 61: lower tier municipalities where we have

02:46:28 Speaker 61: them, some of the CIP programmemes

02:46:30 Speaker 61: are very good. There's some great

02:46:32 Speaker 61: initiatives in there. Flip side of

02:46:34 Speaker 61: that is some of them almost

02:46:35 Speaker 61: are window dressing. Perhaps on Main

02:46:38 Speaker 61: Street, and then somebody can buy

02:46:39 Speaker 61: the building and they have a

02:46:43 Speaker 61: new vision and they rip out

02:46:45 Speaker 61: the taxpayer funded investment that just

02:46:47 Speaker 61: took place a couple years prior

02:46:48 Speaker 61: under new ownership. and it's not

02:46:50 Speaker 61: a lot different than some of

02:46:51 Speaker 61: the the reference that was in

02:46:53 Speaker 61: a report that we approved regarding

02:46:56 Speaker 61: a forest clearing portion of the

02:46:58 Speaker 61: land where it was funded by

02:47:01 Speaker 61: taxpayers in previous years, and we

02:47:03 Speaker 61: just approved wiping that out. That's

02:47:04 Speaker 61: a concern. How do we protect

02:47:06 Speaker 61: that? I feel like a lot

02:47:08 Speaker 61: of CIP is perhaps best delivered

02:47:11 Speaker 61: at the local municipal level, and

02:47:13 Speaker 61: I have a lot of trepidation.

02:47:17 Speaker 61: that we are walking into this

02:47:19 Speaker 61: at the at the county level.

02:47:21 Speaker 61: Thank you. There's a lot there.

02:47:24 Speaker 61: So maintain. I'll just I'll start

02:47:28 Speaker 61: there. So you know I think

02:47:30 Speaker 61: when the housing action plan was

02:47:31 Speaker 61: was first developed, we were aware

02:47:34 Speaker 61: that some uprisers had CIPs, but

02:47:37 Speaker 61: we knew that. it would be

02:47:39 Speaker 61: a process if we were interested

02:47:40 Speaker 61: to kind of have explore that

02:47:43 Speaker 61: tool for ourselves. So I think

02:47:46 Speaker 61: the the way that the Housing

02:47:47 Speaker 61: Action Plan addresses that is, you

02:47:49 Speaker 61: know, we talked about maintaining and

02:47:51 Speaker 61: and supporting that ongoing CIP programme,

02:47:54 Speaker 61: so administratively delivered at the county

02:47:58 Speaker 61: level, and actioned through the local

02:48:00 Speaker 61: CIP bylaws because that's the tools

02:48:04 Speaker 61: that we had available to us

02:48:06 Speaker 61: to deliver that portfolio. With Bill

02:48:07 Speaker 61: sixty, that changes. and now we

02:48:10 Speaker 61: do have the ability to have

02:48:12 Speaker 61: that tool. So, you know, I

02:48:13 Speaker 61: think there was general commentary in

02:48:15 Speaker 61: the Housing Action Plan around complementary

02:48:17 Speaker 61: incentives and trying to to offer

02:48:18 Speaker 61: support and and maintain that CIP

02:48:20 Speaker 61: programme. Um. So I have, you're

02:48:22 Speaker 61: right. I've taken some licence to

02:48:25 Speaker 61: say that we've talked about the

02:48:26 Speaker 61: CIP in the Housing Action Plan

02:48:29 Speaker 61: around maintaining incentives and delivering complementary

02:48:31 Speaker 61: incentives. I've made the log to

02:48:33 Speaker 61: jump to say that, and now

02:48:34 Speaker 61: that CIP tool is available at

02:48:35 Speaker 61: the county level, but that is.

02:48:37 Speaker 61: Available at the county level, but

02:48:39 Speaker 61: that it's under that portfolio. But

02:48:41 Speaker 61: when I brought the housing action

02:48:43 Speaker 61: plan update report last November, there

02:48:45 Speaker 61: had been some commentary in there

02:48:47 Speaker 61: around that there was a draft

02:48:49 Speaker 61: of that that legislation, and that

02:48:51 Speaker 61: we thought that that tool would

02:48:53 Speaker 61: become available. Excuse me. Initially sought

02:48:55 Speaker 61: some direction to explore that process

02:48:57 Speaker 61: to get the CIP. So, you

02:48:58 Speaker 61: know, I think all of that

02:49:00 Speaker 61: is natural evolution of of what.

02:49:03 Speaker 61: was identified in the CIP, and

02:49:05 Speaker 61: through subsequent discussions with council around

02:49:09 Speaker 61: pursuing that potential tool, but I

02:49:11 Speaker 61: think that you know you're right.

02:49:14 Speaker 61: Resourcing is limited, so you know

02:49:15 Speaker 61: the sky doesn't fall if we

02:49:16 Speaker 61: don't have a CIP, but I

02:49:19 Speaker 61: think it's about what it could

02:49:20 Speaker 61: be used for, and so I

02:49:22 Speaker 62: struggle to stand here and give

02:49:25 Speaker 62: you the whole vision because it

02:49:25 Speaker 62: is big. I have been working

02:49:27 Speaker 62: on reporting. around kind of bigger

02:49:29 Speaker 62: vision, but I guess what I

02:49:30 Speaker 62: would say is, you know, through

02:49:32 Speaker 62: the Housing Action Plan and all

02:49:35 Speaker 62: of the learning that we've been

02:49:37 Speaker 62: doing around capacity building for affordable

02:49:39 Speaker 62: housing and nonprofit developers, what we

02:49:41 Speaker 62: really heard back is that different

02:49:43 Speaker 62: developers do different types of housing,

02:49:45 Speaker 62: and they have access to different

02:49:48 Speaker 62: tools, and they have access to

02:49:50 Speaker 62: different financial tools. They're resourced very

02:49:53 Speaker 62: differently in terms of their capital

02:49:54 Speaker 62: readiness, and the market is—it's not

02:49:57 Speaker 62: market developers. It's not market developers

02:49:59 Speaker 62: that are creating the affordable, deeply

02:50:02 Speaker 62: affordable housing, and so you know

02:50:03 Speaker 62: I see this as an opportunity

02:50:04 Speaker 62: for us to be really noodling

02:50:07 Speaker 62: in on like exactly where are

02:50:09 Speaker 62: those barriers to our nonprofits at

02:50:11 Speaker 62: the scale that we have in

02:50:12 Speaker 62: our local area engaging around a

02:50:14 Speaker 62: surplus land offering or a project,

02:50:16 Speaker 62: even in partnership, to try and

02:50:18 Speaker 62: get an affordable component of the

02:50:20 Speaker 62: units in, because. different types of

02:50:22 Speaker 62: developers do different types of projects.

02:50:25 Speaker 62: So, you know, when you pull

02:50:28 Speaker 62: all that together, what we hear

02:50:30 Speaker 62: is that the barriers are early

02:50:31 Speaker 62: access to capital in the ideation

02:50:33 Speaker 62: and site preparation stages of development,

02:50:36 Speaker 62: and there aren't great seed funding

02:50:37 Speaker 62: grants available now. There, the the

02:50:40 Speaker 62: federal programme has changed significantly and

02:50:42 Speaker 62: is really available at the later

02:50:49 Speaker 62: stages of a fully cooked project,

02:50:52 Speaker 62: and so. you know, I think

02:50:55 Speaker 62: we're just trying to figure out

02:50:56 Speaker 48: that piece of how do we

02:50:58 Speaker 48: get those right tools at the

02:51:01 Speaker 48: right stage for the right players

02:51:03 Speaker 48: to make that happen. And it's

02:51:05 Speaker 48: in the weeds, and it's very

02:51:08 Speaker 48: neat. But I think if the

02:51:12 Speaker 48: market could create the affordable housing

02:51:14 Speaker 48: that we need without incentives, we

02:51:17 Speaker 48: would have it. So I really

02:51:19 Speaker 48: put this forward as as a

02:51:22 Speaker 48: tool that I think would be

02:51:25 Speaker 48: very helpful to us. But I

02:51:27 Speaker 48: think there are a number of

02:51:29 Speaker 48: stages ahead, right? Like I think

02:51:32 Speaker 48: we. would be reporting back to

02:51:34 Speaker 48: council on that A and B

02:51:37 Speaker 48: activities before we ever get to

02:51:40 Speaker 48: the consultant to do the sequencing.

02:51:42 Speaker 48: At that future stage, I think

02:51:44 Speaker 48: that we could develop a CIP

02:51:47 Speaker 48: programme and then decide budgetarily. We're

02:51:49 Speaker 48: not ready to implement it this

02:51:51 Speaker 48: year. We'll earmark the money for

02:51:52 Speaker 48: next year. So there, there will

02:51:58 Speaker 48: be lots of decision points. I

02:52:00 Speaker 48: think for those further targeting and

02:52:02 Speaker 48: resourcing discussions to happen. So I'll

02:52:05 Speaker 48: leave it there. But happy to

02:52:07 Speaker 34: to continue. Okay, and we'll go

02:52:08 Speaker 34: to Director Taylor for follow up.

02:52:09 Speaker 34: Thank you, Madam Moore, and I

02:52:11 Speaker 34: think just very briefly to build

02:52:13 Speaker 34: on what Liz said, any CIP,

02:52:16 Speaker 34: whether municipal or or upper tier,

02:52:19 Speaker 34: acts as as sort of a

02:52:21 Speaker 34: menu of incentives, and and any

02:52:23 Speaker 34: given council can choose you know

02:52:25 Speaker 34: which which items they want to

02:52:27 Speaker 34: put on the menu versus which

02:52:28 Speaker 34: are too extravagant and wouldn't fit

02:52:29 Speaker 34: the menu, and and so in

02:52:31 Speaker 34: this case, the county's menu we

02:52:33 Speaker 34: can offer is pretty much related

02:52:34 Speaker 34: to affordable housing, and and. so

02:52:36 Speaker 34: while as municipalities you all have

02:52:39 Speaker 34: broad menus and you can do

02:52:40 Speaker 34: things like brownfields or downtown you

02:52:42 Speaker 34: know facade improvements and everything else

02:52:43 Speaker 34: we would have to be very

02:52:45 Speaker 34: very targeted legislatively to to a

02:52:46 Speaker 34: lot of what Liz is describing

02:52:47 Speaker 34: with respect to to the housing

02:52:49 Speaker 34: and and so she's completely right

02:52:50 Speaker 34: you know this is somewhat aspirational

02:52:55 Speaker 34: because we were only given this

02:52:58 Speaker 34: legislative ability late last year we

02:53:04 Speaker 34: don't have a lot to go

02:53:05 Speaker 34: from just yet in terms of

02:53:06 Speaker 34: you know. there's not thirty other

02:53:08 Speaker 58: municipalities with an affordable housing CIP

02:53:10 Speaker 58: in in the province. So we

02:53:11 Speaker 58: we would need to do some

02:53:12 Speaker 58: further work. We would need to

02:53:13 Speaker 58: report back to council and and

02:53:15 Speaker 58: at some point need to further

02:53:18 Speaker 58: flesh out you know what what

02:53:19 Speaker 58: funding a CIP could look like.

02:53:21 Speaker 58: So this is very early stages,

02:53:23 Speaker 58: but certainly respect the the pressures

02:53:25 Speaker 58: that that both you as as

02:53:29 Speaker 58: county councillors and municipal councils are

02:53:31 Speaker 58: under with all the other things

02:53:32 Speaker 58: that are legislatively required. and as

02:53:34 Speaker 58: Liz said, this isn't legislatively required.

02:53:37 Speaker 58: We do think it could

02:53:40 Speaker 58: be a useful tool to to

02:53:43 Speaker 58: help laser in on on some

02:53:45 Speaker 58: of those housing incentives that might

02:53:48 Speaker 58: be useful. Well, thank you. And

02:53:51 Speaker 58: you mentioned some upper tier levels

02:53:52 Speaker 58: of government have some initiatives already

02:53:53 Speaker 58: in place. It might be I

02:53:55 Speaker 58: would enjoy seeing some examples in

02:54:01 Speaker 58: the report. So perhaps that's something

02:54:04 Speaker 58: that can be. emailed, to council.

02:54:05 Speaker 58: Just some references where we can

02:54:07 Speaker 48: access some of those resources, because

02:54:09 Speaker 48: certainly point two moves this forward.

02:54:11 Speaker 48: So when it becomes a budget

02:54:13 Speaker 48: discussion, the council of whomever is

02:54:15 Speaker 48: sitting there has a little bit

02:54:21 Speaker 48: more background to be able to

02:54:24 Speaker 48: see what types of initiatives have

02:54:25 Speaker 48: been in place and then evaluate

02:54:26 Speaker 48: on that, as opposed to here's

02:54:28 Speaker 48: your. budget. What do you think?

02:54:30 Speaker 48: Then your the the council is

02:54:32 Speaker 48: more informed. I guess I'll leave

02:54:36 Speaker 63: it there. I, it's good to

02:54:37 Speaker 63: support, but I don't think we

02:54:39 Speaker 63: want to get into the banking

02:54:41 Speaker 63: business. It's good to work with

02:54:47 Speaker 63: banking, but our role is not

02:54:49 Speaker 63: to get too deep within the

02:54:51 Speaker 63: banking industry. I think in terms

02:54:53 Speaker 21: of funding some endeavors, some. Okay.

02:54:55 Speaker 21: Thank you. We'll go to Councillor

02:54:58 Speaker 21: Nielsen. Thank you again, Ward Matrasoff,

02:55:00 Speaker 21: and I think Councillor Greg stirred

02:55:09 Speaker 21: some questions in my own mind.

02:55:11 Speaker 21: Currently, the county, as part of

02:55:12 Speaker 21: our budget, puts money into affordable

02:55:16 Speaker 21: housing every year, but we have

02:55:17 Speaker 21: rules and restrictions to how we

02:55:18 Speaker 21: can support nonprofits and groups and

03:38:32 Speaker 21: organisations with that. So, you know,

03:38:33 Speaker 21: hearing Councillor Greg's first question is

03:38:34 Speaker 03: really about what is that financial

03:38:36 Speaker 21: impact to a budget line later.

03:38:40 Speaker 21: The CIP might, moreover, just allow.

03:38:41 Speaker 21: us to have different rules that

03:38:43 Speaker 21: allow us to utilise the funding

03:38:45 Speaker 21: we're already putting away. We know

03:38:47 Speaker 21: that six hundred thousand dollars a

03:38:49 Speaker 21: year isn't going to buy us

03:38:52 Speaker 21: one unit in affordable housing for

03:38:56 Speaker 21: the county, but six hundred thousand

03:38:58 Speaker 21: dollars can help support the acquisition

03:39:00 Speaker 21: of land for a nonprofit that

03:39:04 Speaker 21: could then turn it around. And

03:39:07 Speaker 21: currently, the rules are we can't

03:39:10 Speaker 21: do that. But utilising a CIP,

03:39:12 Speaker 21: we might be able to find

03:39:16 Speaker 21: an avenue to which we can

03:39:20 Speaker 21: support a nonprofit utilising the funds

03:39:24 Speaker 21: we are currently have. There's a

03:39:26 Speaker 21: question. in there. Thank you very

03:39:29 Speaker 21: much. It went up at the

03:39:30 Speaker 21: end. Yes, so I think I

03:39:32 Speaker 21: think it does. It would it

03:39:34 Speaker 21: would allow us to act more

03:39:36 Speaker 21: nimbly, potentially with the dollars we

03:39:44 Speaker 21: have. And and I haven't had

03:39:47 Speaker 21: the conversation with Anne Marie in

03:39:48 Speaker 21: detail yet. And I did not

03:39:51 Speaker 64: want to speak to you know

03:39:54 Speaker 64: that levy fund and and seeking

03:39:55 Speaker 64: any claim to it. But I

03:39:56 Speaker 64: I do think you know we

03:39:57 Speaker 64: have those dollars. We're able to

03:39:59 Speaker 64: award them through partnership or flow

03:40:02 Speaker 64: through agreements. or a capital facilities

03:40:04 Speaker 64: bylaw, but a CIP is is

03:40:06 Speaker 64: a much more flexible tool to

03:40:07 Speaker 64: be able to do that. And

03:40:10 Speaker 64: particularly, we have been working through

03:40:12 Speaker 64: evaluation of a few of our

03:40:14 Speaker 64: county properties, considering potential housing use

03:40:18 Speaker 64: and surplus opportunities. So again, just

03:40:20 Speaker 64: for partnership facilitation as well, to

03:40:22 Speaker 64: be able to to be incenting

03:40:24 Speaker 64: or waiving certain things at the

03:40:26 Speaker 64: county level, which. we don't have

03:40:28 Speaker 64: the ability to do right now

03:40:30 Speaker 64: through those agreements, so yes, enabling.

03:40:32 Speaker 64: Thank you. Okay. Anything further, Councillor

03:40:34 Speaker 64: Gray? That just triggered a thought.

03:40:35 Speaker 64: Is there a mechanism here where,

03:40:37 Speaker 64: if somebody wants to construct a

03:40:38 Speaker 64: nine thousand square foot home, you

03:40:40 Speaker 64: could place like a CIP tax

03:40:42 Speaker 64: on it and then put it

03:40:45 Speaker 64: into a reserve for redistribution into

03:40:48 Speaker 64: affordable housing? I mean, I'd like

03:40:50 Speaker 64: for your heads. I see Scott

03:40:51 Speaker 64: was reaching for his button, there.

03:40:53 Speaker 64: So I don't know if you

03:40:56 Speaker 64: had a response in mind, but

03:40:58 Speaker 64: I'm not aware of that programme.

03:40:59 Speaker 64: But I'll pass along to Dr.

03:41:01 Speaker 64: Taylor. Okay. Yeah, ditto. I'm not

03:41:05 Speaker 64: aware of any legislative authority. It's

03:41:07 Speaker 64: something we could look into further

03:41:08 Speaker 64: with with legal services staff, but

03:41:10 Speaker 64: I'm not aware of anything there.

03:41:12 Speaker 64: Okay. Anything further? All right then,

03:41:17 Speaker 64: I'll call the question. All those

03:41:18 Speaker 64: in favour? And that motion is

03:41:20 Speaker 64: carried. Thank you very much, Planner

03:41:23 Speaker 64: Buckton. And we will be breaking

03:41:24 Speaker 64: for lunch now, and coming back

03:41:25 Speaker 65: at. Okay. Okay. So if I

03:41:27 Speaker 65: could call everybody back at 1:25,

03:41:32 Speaker 65: then we will carry on with

03:41:36 Speaker 65: the remainder of the item sevens,

03:41:39 Speaker 65: the two that were pulled from

03:41:41 Speaker 66: six, and then we. do have

03:41:43 Speaker 66: closed session as well. Thank you.

03:41:47 Speaker 66: Okay, thank you very much, everyone.

03:41:48 Speaker 66: We do have a quorum here

03:41:50 Speaker 66: around the table, and we are

03:41:53 Speaker 11: going to be continuing with Item

03:41:56 Speaker 11: 7G. And with that, once we

03:41:59 Speaker 11: get it moved on the floor,

03:42:06 Speaker 11: we will then look to our

03:42:08 Speaker 11: interim Director of Finance and Treasurer

03:42:11 Speaker 11: Murray to come and provide an

03:42:13 Speaker 11: introduction. So it's recommended that Report

03:42:14 Speaker 11: FRCW 1926 Healthcare Funding Requests 2027

03:42:16 Speaker 11: Budget be received, and that staff

03:42:24 Speaker 11: be directed to maintain the budget.

03:42:27 Speaker 11: Be directed to maintain the budgeted

03:42:31 Speaker 11: $200,000 transfer to the healthcare initiatives

03:42:33 Speaker 56: reserve for the 2027 budget and

03:42:35 Speaker 56: 2028 projected budgets, and that staff

03:42:36 Speaker 56: be directed to include the Sogin

03:42:38 Speaker 56: Hospice Inc. request of $175,000 to

03:42:41 Speaker 56: be included for consideration in the

03:42:42 Speaker 56: 2027 to 2031 budgets of $35,000

03:42:44 Speaker 67: per year to be funded from

03:42:46 Speaker 67: the healthcare funding reserve. So may

03:42:48 Speaker 67: ask for a mover and a

03:42:50 Speaker 67: seconder. Let it move by Councillor

03:42:53 Speaker 67: Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Dicker. It's

03:42:57 Speaker 67: now on the floor for discussion,

03:42:58 Speaker 67: and welcome, interim director of finance,

03:43:01 Speaker 67: Murray. Thank you, Andrew, the Warden.

03:43:02 Speaker 67: As you are aware, in 2022,

03:43:04 Speaker 67: the Gray County did pass a

03:43:05 Speaker 09: health and healthcare funding policy, and

03:43:06 Speaker 09: the details are a little bit

03:43:07 Speaker 09: in the report. I won't go

03:43:09 Speaker 09: into that in. my narrative right

03:43:11 Speaker 09: now. But so we do ask

03:43:13 Speaker 09: that if there are any organisations

03:43:14 Speaker 09: that would request a donation, that

03:43:16 Speaker 09: it must be submitted by June

03:43:20 Speaker 09: 30th to us. And we did

03:43:21 Speaker 09: receive one formal request in December

03:43:22 Speaker 09: of 2025. They did do a

03:43:24 Speaker 09: formal presentation, and they followed that

03:43:25 Speaker 09: up with a written request for

03:43:28 Speaker 09: 175,000 to be funded over three

03:43:29 Speaker 09: to five years. There was a

03:43:30 Speaker 09: request to help build a hospice

03:43:31 Speaker 09: in in Greg. In in Gray

03:43:32 Speaker 09: County, in part of Gray County,

03:43:38 Speaker 09: so I have I am recommending

03:43:44 Speaker 09: that we include that in our

03:43:45 Speaker 09: budget for discussion. I am recommending

03:43:52 Speaker 09: that it be funded over five

03:43:53 Speaker 09: years, which would be thirty five

03:44:01 Speaker 09: thousand per year, to be funded

03:44:05 Speaker 09: out of our current healthcare reserve.

03:44:09 Speaker 09: So there would be no levy

03:44:14 Speaker 27: request added to the levy in

03:44:15 Speaker 27: twenty twenty seven. Our current reserve

03:44:18 Speaker 27: balance at the end of twenty

03:44:22 Speaker 27: twenty six is projected to be

03:44:23 Speaker 27: just a little over two hundred

03:44:26 Speaker 27: twenty seven thousand, and at the

03:44:28 Speaker 27: end. of 2027, if we were

03:44:31 Speaker 27: to include the thirty-five thousand dollars

03:44:34 Speaker 27: on top of the two hundred

03:44:37 Speaker 27: thousand that Gray County has already

03:44:41 Speaker 27: committed to for the Wellness and

03:44:44 Speaker 27: Recovery Centre for the Gravurs Health

03:44:46 Speaker 27: Services, that would leave us with

03:44:50 Speaker 27: a balance at the end of

03:44:51 Speaker 27: a 2027 proposed draft budget of

03:44:53 Speaker 27: 192,144 dollars. And that's all I

03:44:57 Speaker 27: was going to say today. If

03:44:59 Speaker 27: anyone, so I will turn it

03:45:03 Speaker 27: over for any questions. Thank you

03:45:05 Speaker 27: very much, and I'll look to

03:45:10 Speaker 27: committee. The whole members, if they

03:45:12 Speaker 27: have any questions on that plan,

03:45:18 Speaker 27: Deputy Warden. Thank you, Madam Warden,

03:45:19 Speaker 27: and thank you, Sue. I I'm

03:45:22 Speaker 27: going to say that I'm going

03:45:25 Speaker 27: to oppose the motion, but at

03:45:27 Speaker 27: the same time support the need

03:45:27 Speaker 27: for this facility. How long? And

03:45:30 Speaker 27: I'll ask a rhetorical question: How

03:45:34 Speaker 27: long are we going to let?

03:45:38 Speaker 27: the province off the hook? Healthcare

03:45:39 Speaker 27: is a provincial responsibility. It is

03:45:42 Speaker 27: not the responsibility of the land

03:45:46 Speaker 27: taxpayer, property taxpayer. I guess that's

03:45:48 Speaker 27: the gist of my my my

03:45:51 Speaker 27: words. I I just can't support

03:45:53 Speaker 27: this. The province has for too

03:45:55 Speaker 27: long been let off the hook,

03:45:58 Speaker 27: and I'm not prepared to support

03:46:01 Speaker 27: this. Thank you. Other comments? Any

03:46:03 Speaker 27: follow-up from staff with regards to

03:46:08 Speaker 27: that? No. Oh, sorry. We'll go

03:46:11 Speaker 27: to Councillor McLean then. Thank you,

03:46:13 Speaker 27: Madam Warden. And just to be

03:46:15 Speaker 27: brief, I know that this policy

03:46:16 Speaker 09: was developed. I think you said

03:46:18 Speaker 09: 2022, and I know it talks

03:46:20 Speaker 09: about in the report that it

03:46:23 Speaker 09: must demonstrate that 20% of the

03:46:24 Speaker 09: house of those it serves must

03:46:25 Speaker 09: be great. Serves must be Gray

03:46:27 Speaker 09: County residents. I know there was

03:46:29 Speaker 09: a presentation from Southern Georgia Bay

03:46:30 Speaker 09: Hospital Group that is raising, you

03:46:32 Speaker 09: know, a million dollars for the

03:46:34 Speaker 09: Colliwick or the new Southern Georgia

03:46:36 Speaker 09: Bay Hospital, and I know that

03:46:37 Speaker 09: they got discouraged and they went

03:46:38 Speaker 09: away. But I think, in the

03:46:44 Speaker 09: sense, and this is just maybe

03:46:48 Speaker 09: for the next term of council,

03:46:49 Speaker 09: that maybe that policy needs to

03:46:52 Speaker 09: be reviewed because when it says

03:46:54 Speaker 09: 20% of its residents are to

03:46:59 Speaker 34: be served, that was I think

03:47:00 Speaker 34: I think originally went back to

03:47:01 Speaker 34: 2018 as when Back 2018 is

03:47:03 Speaker 34: when that first came forward. When

03:47:08 Speaker 34: you talk about residents and you

03:47:11 Speaker 34: talk about the Blue Mountains and

03:47:14 Speaker 34: the Blue Mountain Resorts, I think

03:47:16 Speaker 34: if you're a guest for one

03:47:18 Speaker 34: night, you're a resident. Anyway, I'm

03:47:22 Speaker 34: not going to get into that

03:47:24 Speaker 15: tonight or today, but I think

03:47:25 Speaker 15: there needs to be a review

03:47:27 Speaker 15: of that policy, and I'll leave

03:47:29 Speaker 15: it at that. Okay. Any other

03:47:31 Speaker 15: comments, Councillor Eccles? Thank you. I

03:47:33 Speaker 15: agree. with some of the things

03:47:35 Speaker 15: that Councillor Deputy Warden Millen states.

03:47:36 Speaker 15: This isn't one of the ones

03:47:41 Speaker 15: I agree with him on. Yes,

03:47:44 Speaker 15: we do need these facilities. It's

03:47:52 Speaker 15: not quite healthcare, but it's the

03:47:56 Speaker 15: end of life care. Quickly, Sue.

03:48:01 Speaker 15: I don't know whether you have

03:48:02 Speaker 15: the information. What did we, as

03:48:05 Speaker 68: Gray County, put into Chapman House?

03:48:06 Speaker 68: We've already been down this road,

03:48:08 Speaker 68: and I believe that the county

03:48:10 Speaker 68: had money in. I can see

03:48:12 Speaker 68: Councillor Patterson nodding. That I believe

03:48:14 Speaker 68: we did put something in there.

03:48:17 Speaker 68: But the other factor is in

03:48:20 Speaker 68: healthcare; it goes well beyond hospice

03:48:22 Speaker 68: care. how many of the municipalities,

03:48:24 Speaker 68: how many property tax dollars have

03:48:26 Speaker 69: gone into the new building, Markdale?

03:48:29 Speaker 69: And I know that Southgate put

03:48:32 Speaker 69: in over three hundred thousand into

03:48:34 Speaker 69: that one. Yeah, I agree with

03:48:38 Speaker 69: you, but it's where we're at

03:48:41 Speaker 69: with the province on delivering healthcare—not

03:48:43 Speaker 69: just the bricks and mortar. It's

03:48:46 Speaker 69: the continuous maintenance and upgrades and.

03:48:47 Speaker 69: equipment that we continue to put

03:48:50 Speaker 69: into healthcare. I'm wondering if we

03:48:54 Speaker 69: were doing the same thing. I

03:49:00 Speaker 69: guess maybe we'd have to ask,

03:49:04 Speaker 69: you know, the property tax payers

03:49:06 Speaker 69: to add in and pay more,

03:49:09 Speaker 69: or if we could get the

03:49:12 Speaker 69: province to start putting more fuel

03:49:18 Speaker 69: into our graders to, or get

03:49:20 Speaker 69: a few more zambonis that somebody

03:49:22 Speaker 69: would purchase. so we can keep

03:49:25 Speaker 69: running our arenas, but that's a

03:49:27 Speaker 69: different topic. I I will be

03:49:32 Speaker 69: supporting this for the fact that

03:49:34 Speaker 69: it's an initiative. It is for

03:49:38 Speaker 69: five years, and it's done. And

03:49:42 Speaker 69: it is our commitment to the

03:49:44 Speaker 69: health of our communities, and to

03:49:47 Speaker 69: the welfare of the citizens of

03:49:53 Speaker 69: our communities. So, I will be

03:49:56 Speaker 69: supporting the recommendations. It stays. Okay,

03:50:00 Speaker 69: thank you. Other comments, Councillor McQueen,

03:50:01 Speaker 69: and then Councillor Nielsen. Well, just

03:50:06 Speaker 69: following up on what the requirements

03:50:08 Speaker 69: are for healthcare. Just again, in

03:50:10 Speaker 69: the Southern Georgian Bay Hospital, they

03:50:12 Speaker 69: got to raise a hundred million

03:50:14 Speaker 69: for a billion-dollar hospital. So, but

03:50:16 Speaker 69: I do want to put a

03:50:18 Speaker 69: shout out for the Beaver Valley

03:50:20 Speaker 69: Ski Club. Just in June, they

03:50:23 Speaker 69: raised seventy-five thousand dollars for the

03:50:24 Speaker 69: for the Chapman House. So, a

03:50:29 Speaker 69: lot of funds are raised from

03:50:31 Speaker 69: local organisations that go back into

03:50:34 Speaker 69: those hospices. Those hospice, and I

03:50:36 Speaker 69: think that you know we all

03:50:38 Speaker 69: would agree that the end of

03:50:41 Speaker 69: life care is is so so

03:50:43 Speaker 69: important for sure. Councillor Nielsen. Thank

03:50:44 Speaker 69: you very much. Where much often

03:50:46 Speaker 69: forgive me, I'm just trying to

03:50:48 Speaker 69: remember the delegation and was the

03:50:50 Speaker 69: request from the hospice operational or

03:50:52 Speaker 69: capital funding? That I can I

03:50:54 Speaker 69: did confirm that the funds would

03:50:55 Speaker 69: go directly to the building of

03:50:57 Speaker 69: the of the hospice itself. Okay,

03:51:02 Speaker 69: and we'll look to the CAO.

03:51:06 Speaker 69: Just through Councillor Echo's question earlier,

03:51:12 Speaker 69: with respect to how much the

03:51:16 Speaker 26: county provided to the Chapman House,

03:51:22 Speaker 26: I did find some correspondence indicates

03:51:25 Speaker 26: that back in 2017 we provided

03:51:28 Speaker 70: a one-time capital grant of two

03:51:30 Speaker 70: hundred thousand dollars towards the construction,

03:51:32 Speaker 70: which again would be close to

03:51:34 Speaker 70: ten years ago in terms of

03:51:36 Speaker 70: towards that that particular project. So

03:51:40 Speaker 70: there could be more. funding that

03:51:41 Speaker 70: was provided, but that was definitely

03:51:45 Speaker 70: the amount that I could find

03:51:48 Speaker 70: in a short period of time.

03:51:50 Speaker 70: Thank you for that information.

03:51:52 Speaker 70: Okay, Councillor Gray. I would just

03:51:54 Speaker 70: like to state that I oppose

03:51:56 Speaker 70: the motion as is there because

03:51:58 Speaker 70: we have a. two hundred thousand

03:52:01 Speaker 70: dollar budget line item, does not

03:52:03 Speaker 70: mean it has to exist in

03:52:10 Speaker 70: continuity and that it's there to

03:52:13 Speaker 70: be drawn from. We have various

03:52:16 Speaker 70: investments in other healthcare initiatives, the

03:52:19 Speaker 70: Bayview Wellness, which is the two

03:52:21 Speaker 70: hundred thousand dollars, where you can

03:52:23 Speaker 70: easily demonstrate the impact in terms

03:52:26 Speaker 70: of reducing strain on some of

03:52:27 Speaker 70: the resources that the hospital may

03:52:30 Speaker 70: provide or that we provide through

03:52:32 Speaker 70: Kevin's team. In fact, just earlier,

03:52:35 Speaker 70: Kevin. spoke about hospital offloading. We

03:52:36 Speaker 70: have certain operational costs that we

03:52:40 Speaker 70: embed in our work here, which

03:52:42 Speaker 70: reduces strain in other in other

03:52:45 Speaker 70: systems that provide services for the

03:52:49 Speaker 70: public. But this is not one

03:52:51 Speaker 70: I can get behind. I firmly

03:52:53 Speaker 70: believe that the plaque on the

03:52:54 Speaker 70: wall is there to perhaps show

03:52:56 Speaker 70: Joe's excavating or. Murray's hauling whatever

03:53:00 Speaker 70: you know, a lawyer's office, a

03:53:07 Speaker 70: commercial interest that has something to

03:53:09 Speaker 70: gain with the exposure by investing

03:53:11 Speaker 70: and making that economic or that

03:53:14 Speaker 15: financial support. I'm totally on

03:53:17 Speaker 15: side with where we can and

03:53:19 Speaker 15: supported Chapman House, you know, and

03:53:20 Speaker 15: sound where we can reduce soft

03:53:23 Speaker 15: services, soft costs. at the times

03:53:26 Speaker 15: of construction, waived fees, certain municipal

03:53:29 Speaker 15: fees that can be waived, that

03:53:30 Speaker 15: are incremental, that are there, totally

03:53:32 Speaker 15: on, totally in support of supporting

03:53:34 Speaker 15: organisations such as this with initiatives

03:53:37 Speaker 15: like that. But in terms of

03:53:39 Speaker 15: just providing support financially, where the

03:53:42 Speaker 15: taxpayer can then see. that a

03:53:44 Speaker 15: level of government just donated their

03:53:46 Speaker 15: money is not something that I

03:53:48 Speaker 15: can get behind. I understand perhaps

03:53:50 Speaker 15: the the donation to Chapman House

03:53:53 Speaker 15: as well in the past, but

03:53:56 Speaker 15: again, I referred to it earlier

03:53:59 Speaker 15: today. Times may be different if

03:54:02 Speaker 15: we're looking at five, six, seven

03:54:04 Speaker 15: percent increases in our tax lines.

03:54:05 Speaker 15: This is a tax line that

03:54:08 Speaker 15: should see scrutiny when it comes

03:54:10 Speaker 15: budget time and when that. two

03:54:12 Speaker 15: hundred thousand dollar donate donation commitment

03:54:14 Speaker 15: ends, then this is an opportunity

03:54:16 Speaker 15: where that two hundred thousand dollar

03:54:19 Speaker 15: line item should be evaluated by

03:54:21 Speaker 15: the council of the day. So,

03:54:22 Speaker 15: I I'm not in favour of

03:54:25 Speaker 15: us committing because it is a

03:54:31 Speaker 15: commitment. It's only going into the

03:54:34 Speaker 15: budget, but it is showing commitment

03:54:37 Speaker 71: again to maintaining that two hundred

03:54:39 Speaker 71: thousand dollar line item, which

03:54:42 Speaker 71: I think in this case should

03:54:44 Speaker 16: have future scrutiny. by council in

03:54:48 Speaker 16: terms of whether it stays or

03:54:51 Speaker 16: whether it goes out of the

03:54:54 Speaker 16: budget in future years. Okay, thank

03:54:55 Speaker 16: you. Any further comments? Not seeing

03:54:58 Speaker 16: any other hands. Oh, sorry, Councillor

03:55:00 Speaker 16: Kennedy. Thank you, Madam Warden. I

03:55:02 Speaker 16: just think that we, Deputy Warden's.

03:55:04 Speaker 16: comments are certainly apropos, but I

03:55:08 Speaker 16: think that it's time that we

03:55:11 Speaker 16: get behind the movement to try

03:55:14 Speaker 16: and fix the problem with the

03:55:17 Speaker 16: province, and and that this should

03:55:18 Speaker 16: be the beginning of a of

03:55:29 Speaker 16: a move to try and change

03:55:30 Speaker 16: things, and to and it's going

03:55:35 Speaker 03: to take some work for municipalities

03:55:42 Speaker 03: to and maybe when you're at

03:55:45 Speaker 72: the AMO in the next little

03:55:56 Speaker 72: while. you'll have some discussions with

03:56:00 Speaker 72: the other municipal representatives around the

03:56:04 Speaker 72: province and see if we can't,

03:56:05 Speaker 73: you know, move the needle with

03:56:14 Speaker 73: the province on healthcare, which the

03:56:17 Speaker 73: health system is pretty close to

03:56:19 Speaker 03: broke. I think it's awfully difficult

03:56:22 Speaker 03: to, having supported hospitals and hospices

03:56:24 Speaker 21: to the degree that Grey County

03:56:27 Speaker 21: has for many, many years, I

03:56:28 Speaker 21: think just. an open break and

03:56:31 Speaker 21: say so sad, but we're done

03:56:33 Speaker 21: is just not the way to

03:56:34 Speaker 21: to move on it. And I

03:56:35 Speaker 21: think that there are better ways,

03:56:38 Speaker 21: and they will be take time

03:56:39 Speaker 21: and work, but that's what needs

03:56:41 Speaker 21: to be done. And that we,

03:56:43 Speaker 21: you know, I think council should

03:56:47 Speaker 21: examine every year what has contributed

03:56:50 Speaker 21: to some of these causes. But

03:56:52 Speaker 21: there's a long established tradition of.

03:56:55 Speaker 21: Gray County standing behind the most

03:56:57 Speaker 21: important needs of our communities, and

03:56:58 Speaker 21: that and we know there's a

03:57:00 Speaker 21: great need for this new hospice,

03:57:02 Speaker 21: and that we should continue to

03:57:03 Speaker 21: support it. Thank you. Thank you.

03:57:05 Speaker 21: Any other comments, CAO? Just further

03:57:07 Speaker 21: to through your warden, through to

03:57:10 Speaker 21: Councillor Gregg's comments with respect to

03:57:11 Speaker 21: in terms of the. incoming council's

03:57:13 Speaker 21: consideration, future budget considerations, the way

03:57:15 Speaker 21: the motion is currently worded is

03:57:16 Speaker 21: that staff be directed to include

03:57:19 Speaker 21: this request of 175,000 included for

03:57:20 Speaker 21: consideration in those respective budgets of

03:57:22 Speaker 69: 35,000 per year to be funded

03:57:24 Speaker 69: from the healthcare funding reserve. So

03:57:26 Speaker 69: there would be consideration, even if

03:57:28 Speaker 69: this motion were to be approved,

03:57:30 Speaker 69: there would be consideration for that

03:57:34 Speaker 69: to be, I guess, reconsidered or

03:57:37 Speaker 69: discussed further with respect to. when

03:57:40 Speaker 69: we go through the the budget

03:57:43 Speaker 69: process, as part of that, is

03:57:48 Speaker 69: at least my take in terms

03:57:51 Speaker 69: of the wording. And so, but

03:57:53 Speaker 69: as per the current policy, we

03:57:55 Speaker 69: received a request before the June

03:57:58 Speaker 69: thirty deadline. As as as interim

03:58:00 Speaker 69: director Murray noted, it meets the

03:58:05 Speaker 69: policy requirements as set out by

03:58:08 Speaker 69: the policy that was approved by

03:58:13 Speaker 69: council. I think interim director Murray's

03:58:14 Speaker 69: come up with a you know

03:58:15 Speaker 64: identified here's where. we're at with

03:58:17 Speaker 64: the with the current reserve amount,

03:58:17 Speaker 64: and here's how it could be

03:58:20 Speaker 64: funded. But recognizing that that could

03:58:22 Speaker 64: still be up for consideration as

03:58:24 Speaker 64: as part of the overall budget

03:58:26 Speaker 64: discussions is is my current take

03:58:27 Speaker 64: of of the wording of the

03:58:29 Speaker 64: motion. Okay, thank you, Councillor Dobrine.

03:58:33 Speaker 64: Thank you, and through you twofold,

03:58:37 Speaker 64: if you were asking us to

03:58:39 Speaker 64: commit one hundred seventy five thousand.

03:58:42 Speaker 64: Commit one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars

03:58:43 Speaker 64: one-time payment. I would have issue.

03:58:44 Speaker 64: I would have concern. We have

03:58:46 Speaker 64: committed other areas two hundred thousand

03:58:49 Speaker 64: dollars in its entirety, and this

03:58:53 Speaker 64: is over a five-year period. But

03:58:54 Speaker 64: this is still to be decided

03:58:57 Speaker 64: by the incoming council as to

03:59:01 Speaker 64: what's in, what's out. Are we

03:59:04 Speaker 64: continuing? Are we not continuing? So

03:59:05 Speaker 64: this is a more of a

03:59:06 Speaker 64: recommendation to. the new council as

03:59:09 Speaker 64: to what to consider. Could you

03:59:10 Speaker 64: just refresh my memory? The Soging

03:59:11 Speaker 64: Hospice was going to be located

03:59:13 Speaker 64: in Walkerton. Through you, Warren. Yes,

03:59:15 Speaker 64: that's that's our understanding is that

03:59:18 Speaker 64: it's to be built in in

03:59:19 Speaker 64: in Walkerton in the northeast corner

03:59:22 Speaker 64: of Walkerton. East corner of Walkerton,

03:59:23 Speaker 64: so therefore not located in Gray

03:59:24 Speaker 64: County, and northeast. Okay, thank you.

03:59:27 Speaker 64: I answered my question. Thank you.

03:59:30 Speaker 64: Okay, any other comments? Okay, then

03:59:31 Speaker 64: I will call the question. All

03:59:33 Speaker 64: those in favour. All the question.

03:59:34 Speaker 64: All those in favour. Okay, that

03:59:36 Speaker 64: motion is carried. Thank you. Okay,

03:59:37 Speaker 64: thank you very much, Treasurer Murray.

03:59:39 Speaker 64: And at this point in time,

03:59:42 Speaker 64: before we go to 7H, because

03:59:44 Speaker 64: it is tied to the closed

03:59:45 Speaker 64: session material, we will now return

03:59:46 Speaker 64: to items 6C and F, unless

03:59:48 Speaker 64: there's any objection to that. It

03:59:51 Speaker 64: would make more sense for the

03:59:52 Speaker 64: flow of what we. have to

03:59:54 Speaker 64: do this afternoon. Okay, seeing no

03:59:57 Speaker 64: objections, we will then go to

03:59:59 Speaker 64: item six C, the first item

04:00:02 Speaker 64: which was pulled. Oh, so I

04:00:04 Speaker 64: guess get ready, come on back,

04:00:05 Speaker 64: Madam Treasurer. It's recommended that report

04:00:08 Speaker 64: FRCW eighteen twenty six regarding the

04:00:09 Speaker 64: quarterly purchasing report for quarter two

04:00:10 Speaker 64: of twenty twenty six be received

04:00:12 Speaker 64: for information. May I ask for

04:00:14 Speaker 64: a mover and a seconder? I

04:00:17 Speaker 64: got it moved by Councillor Keaveny,

04:00:19 Speaker 64: seconded by Councillor Gregg. So. By

04:00:20 Speaker 64: Councillor Greg, so on the floor

04:00:21 Speaker 64: for discussion, Councillor Greg, you had

04:00:23 Speaker 64: asked to pull this to share

04:00:24 Speaker 64: a question. Please go ahead. I

04:00:25 Speaker 64: do, which might be better than

04:00:27 Speaker 64: having to go through all the

04:00:32 Speaker 64: line items in the quarterly purchasing

04:00:33 Speaker 64: purchasing report, which I thank you

04:00:36 Speaker 64: for presenting or preparing for us.

04:00:38 Speaker 64: My question, when I was reading

04:00:40 Speaker 15: it, there was a line item.

04:00:42 Speaker 15: It was seven one three Ninth

04:00:43 Speaker 15: Avenue East, and it was a

04:00:47 Speaker 15: roofing project. And in to my

04:00:50 Speaker 15: memory, I had no recollection of

04:00:52 Speaker 15: this ever being. Collection of this

04:00:54 Speaker 15: ever being in exposed during budget

04:00:56 Speaker 15: to council, and in reaching out

04:00:58 Speaker 15: to staff. Well, perhaps I'll let

04:01:01 Speaker 15: you present as to why that

04:01:04 Speaker 15: is. I think I wonder about

04:01:07 Speaker 15: strengthening our policy in the future

04:01:10 Speaker 15: so that an expenditure of that

04:01:13 Speaker 15: size, that's not on in the

04:01:15 Speaker 15: existing capital plan, is something that

04:01:17 Speaker 15: council's made aware of. before it

04:01:19 Speaker 15: just appears on a quarterly report.

04:01:20 Speaker 15: Yes, thank you for that question.

04:01:22 Speaker 15: This project, which Harrison has is

04:01:25 Speaker 15: you directed the question to him.

04:01:28 Speaker 15: He answered it, so I'm going

04:01:31 Speaker 15: to try to. He probably has

04:01:33 Speaker 15: more of the devil in the

04:01:37 Speaker 15: details, but I I truly feel

04:01:39 Speaker 15: reflecting upon it. Yep, I as

04:01:43 Speaker 15: we as finance did not do

04:01:46 Speaker 15: maybe the steps we probably should

04:01:49 Speaker 15: have done in the correct order.

04:01:51 Speaker 15: I think it was. some of

04:01:53 Speaker 15: it was some timing issues around

04:01:56 Speaker 15: grants being approved and not hitting

04:01:57 Speaker 15: reports the way we should have.

04:02:00 Speaker 15: So going forward, definitely this should

04:02:03 Speaker 15: have been brought a report to

04:02:04 Speaker 15: council should have been brought to

04:02:06 Speaker 15: you your attention on this capital

04:02:08 Speaker 15: project. There was in twenty twenty

04:02:11 Speaker 15: four twenty five was there was

04:02:13 Speaker 15: some co chief funds there was

04:02:17 Speaker 15: an investment plan presented. It was

04:02:18 Speaker 15: in. in there, and then in

04:02:20 Speaker 15: I think in the fall of

04:02:23 Speaker 15: twenty twenty five, there was a

04:02:25 Speaker 15: tender for that project build, and

04:02:27 Speaker 15: the and then the staff decided

04:02:29 Speaker 15: that they re tendered. There was

04:02:30 Speaker 15: two bids, and then they re

04:02:38 Speaker 15: tendered it back, and unfortunately, we

04:02:39 Speaker 15: missed picking it back up into

04:02:41 Speaker 15: that next budget cycle. So there

04:02:43 Speaker 15: were some missed pieces along the

04:02:44 Speaker 15: way, and I all knows as

04:02:47 Speaker 21: finance. So, but I what could

04:02:51 Speaker 21: I can tell to you going

04:02:53 Speaker 21: forward is that we will. do

04:02:55 Speaker 21: better. Going forward, we should have

04:02:57 Speaker 21: realized in when we did our

04:03:00 Speaker 21: capital project report earlier to you

04:03:04 Speaker 21: that we should have included it

04:03:06 Speaker 21: in there. But I think that

04:03:08 Speaker 21: too was also a timing difference

04:03:10 Speaker 21: because there were no expenditures. We

04:03:13 Speaker 21: didn't have a capital project identified

04:03:14 Speaker 21: to that project in our budget.

04:03:16 Speaker 21: Hadn't spent it, and it was

04:03:19 Speaker 21: right around the time we were

04:03:21 Speaker 21: doing the report, and it wasn't

04:03:25 Speaker 21: quite. It was purely a timing

04:03:27 Speaker 21: issue. Going forward, I did speak

04:03:29 Speaker 21: with our purchasing manager this morning.

04:03:32 Speaker 21: Going forward, we will ensure that

04:03:35 Speaker 21: when we are doing capital projects,

04:03:40 Speaker 21: we will also identify a capital

04:03:44 Speaker 21: project number so that we can

04:03:49 Speaker 21: identify it back into our budget

04:03:50 Speaker 21: book. And/or we also will, for

04:03:52 Speaker 21: our internal purposes, need to know

04:03:54 Speaker 21: because there will be capital expenditures

04:03:58 Speaker 21: that we need to apply to

04:03:59 Speaker 21: a capital project going forward for

04:04:01 Speaker 21: our reporting purposes. That's the the

04:04:02 Speaker 21: nice thing about our new budgeting

04:04:05 Speaker 21: software is it allows us to

04:04:07 Speaker 21: do that because there are projects

04:04:08 Speaker 21: sometimes where we do budget. Times

04:04:10 Speaker 21: where we do budget for stuff

04:04:11 Speaker 21: that doesn't actually have a capital

04:04:12 Speaker 21: project, and then we have to

04:04:15 Speaker 21: sort of create one behind the

04:04:17 Speaker 21: scenes because there's a future report.

04:04:19 Speaker 21: So, okay, thank you. We're also

04:04:23 Speaker 09: going to go to the CAO.

04:04:25 Speaker 09: Through you, Warden, and just further

04:04:27 Speaker 09: to interim director Murray's comments with

04:04:29 Speaker 09: respect to this, just to provide

04:04:31 Speaker 09: some context with respect to this

04:04:33 Speaker 09: project and how that project was

04:04:35 Speaker 09: funded. So, as as interim director

04:04:36 Speaker 09: indicated, that this this project was.

04:04:38 Speaker 09: not listed as a project a

04:04:40 Speaker 09: specific project in the capital budget.

04:04:43 Speaker 09: It's funded entirely from our our

04:04:44 Speaker 09: Cochi grant. So these are provincial

04:04:45 Speaker 09: funds that we receive on an

04:04:48 Speaker 09: annual basis, and and through that,

04:04:49 Speaker 09: what what has been the historical

04:04:50 Speaker 09: practice is that we develop what

04:04:52 Speaker 09: the housing department develops an investment

04:04:55 Speaker 09: plan, and that goes through in

04:04:57 Speaker 09: this case the community services committee

04:04:58 Speaker 09: to identify where we might be

04:05:00 Speaker 09: able to. look at some projects

04:05:02 Speaker 09: for allocations, there is funds that

04:05:04 Speaker 09: are set aside and allocated for

04:05:06 Speaker 09: unidentified capital projects. For five hundred

04:05:07 Speaker 09: thousand dollars, that's that was allocated

04:05:08 Speaker 09: with respect to that. That was

04:05:10 Speaker 09: initially earmarked for the Dundalk build

04:05:11 Speaker 09: project, and as as we you've

04:05:13 Speaker 09: heard through updates, that project has

04:05:14 Speaker 09: been delayed, and this this particular

04:05:16 Speaker 09: project popped up in terms of.

04:05:17 Speaker 09: needing to be done, and so

04:05:19 Speaker 09: in order to utilise and maximize

04:05:20 Speaker 09: the use of those funds, it

04:05:25 Speaker 09: was determined by staff at that

04:05:30 Speaker 09: that time to be able to

04:05:31 Speaker 09: proceed with that piece. As interim

04:05:32 Speaker 21: director Murray's indicated, I think there's

04:05:35 Speaker 21: is an opportunity to look at

04:05:37 Speaker 21: what that process looks like going

04:05:38 Speaker 21: forward, so that councils not seeing

04:05:46 Speaker 21: that project at this stage in

04:05:49 Speaker 21: terms of once it's already been

04:05:52 Speaker 21: tendered and and completed. And complete

04:05:54 Speaker 21: it, and so we're looking to

04:05:56 Speaker 21: see what how we can improve

04:05:58 Speaker 21: those processes on a go forward

04:06:01 Speaker 21: basis. So appreciate Councillor Greg raising

04:06:05 Speaker 21: raising that question, and we can

04:06:08 Speaker 21: we'll explore what those those process

04:06:11 Speaker 21: improvements look like going on a

04:06:15 Speaker 21: go forward basis. Okay, thank you,

04:06:18 Speaker 21: and don't see any further questions

04:06:23 Speaker 21: on this matter. So I'll I

04:06:24 Speaker 21: will call the question. All those

04:06:25 Speaker 21: in favour, and that motion is

04:06:27 Speaker 21: carried. Thank you. Next, we'll tidy

04:06:30 Speaker 21: up with section six at F.

04:06:32 Speaker 21: It's recommended that report TRCW twenty

04:06:33 Speaker 21: nine twenty six be received, and

04:06:35 Speaker 21: that a bylaw be brought forward

04:06:37 Speaker 21: for council's consideration to amend Schedule

04:06:38 Speaker 21: A of Bylaw forty nine forty

04:06:39 Speaker 21: five sixteen, being a being the

04:06:41 Speaker 21: bylaw to permit off road vehicles

04:06:44 Speaker 21: on certain roadways under the jurisdiction

04:06:51 Speaker 21: of the County of Grey by

04:06:52 Speaker 21: mending portions of Grey. By mending

04:06:55 Speaker 21: portions of Gray Road 10 and

04:06:56 Speaker 21: Gray Road 28, where off-road vehicles

04:06:58 Speaker 74: are not permitted, specifically Gray Road

04:07:01 Speaker 74: 10 from the south limit of

04:07:02 Speaker 74: Gray County to Natville Road, and

04:07:04 Speaker 74: Gray County Road 10 from Seventh

04:07:07 Speaker 74: Avenue in Hanover to the northern

04:07:08 Speaker 74: limit of Gray County, and Gray

04:07:10 Speaker 74: County Road 28 from the intersection

04:07:11 Speaker 74: of Concession Concession 2 NDR and

04:07:12 Speaker 74: Fifth Side Road NDR. to Bruce

04:07:14 Speaker 74: to Bruce Road, ten Seventh Avenue,

04:07:17 Speaker 74: Hanover. Okay, so may I ask

04:07:19 Speaker 74: for a mover and a seconder?

04:07:22 Speaker 74: Okay, we've got it moved by

04:07:25 Speaker 74: Councillor McQueen. Seconder, seconded by Councillor

04:07:27 Speaker 74: Pringle. So it's on the floor.

04:07:31 Speaker 74: I'm going to go to Councillor

04:07:34 Speaker 74: McQueen first, and then Director Hoy

04:07:35 Speaker 74: will stand in for staff response.

04:07:38 Speaker 74: So Councillor McQueen, you would

04:07:41 Speaker 74: pull this. Okay, thank you, Madam

04:07:42 Speaker 74: Warden, and I have no issue

04:07:44 Speaker 74: with the with the resolution. that's

04:07:46 Speaker 74: in front of us. I guess

04:07:48 Speaker 74: the bigger question is in today's

04:07:51 Speaker 74: day, and I know this has

04:07:53 Speaker 74: been a download from the province,

04:07:55 Speaker 74: fifteen twenty years ago about who

04:07:57 Speaker 74: is the jurisdiction over side by

04:08:01 Speaker 74: side ATVs and all that stuff,

04:08:03 Speaker 74: off road vehicles on our municipal

04:08:05 Speaker 74: roads. I know from Grey Highlands

04:08:07 Speaker 74: we we have a bylaw

04:08:09 Speaker 74: that it just it just lists

04:08:12 Speaker 74: the exemptions, not the roads that

04:08:16 Speaker 74: are allowed. I wonder if at

04:08:18 Speaker 74: some point in the new new

04:08:21 Speaker 74: setting of this horseshoe is this

04:08:21 Speaker 74: is to be reviewed because in

04:08:23 Speaker 74: today's day, I bet you a

04:08:28 Speaker 74: lot of people going down our

04:08:29 Speaker 74: roads roads in Gray County don't

04:08:31 Speaker 74: have a clue that they're not

04:08:33 Speaker 74: supposed to be on county roads,

04:08:35 Speaker 74: and you know the sales of

04:08:38 Speaker 74: side by sides and and is

04:08:40 Speaker 74: continuing to grow and grow and

04:08:43 Speaker 74: grow and and you know people

04:08:45 Speaker 74: are almost using it as a

04:08:49 Speaker 74: means of transportation. So I think

04:08:52 Speaker 74: at some point the bylaws should

04:08:54 Speaker 74: be reviewed and its and its

04:08:58 Speaker 74: entirety and and just see if

04:08:59 Speaker 74: there is maybe the other side

04:09:02 Speaker 74: of like strict, you know, maybe

04:09:05 Speaker 74: looking at restricting the ones where

04:09:07 Speaker 74: you don't want them versus having

04:09:08 Speaker 74: it across. Not opening up the

04:09:10 Speaker 74: conversation today. I just I think

04:09:13 Speaker 74: from today's day, probably most people

04:09:15 Speaker 74: using our roads have no clue,

04:09:18 Speaker 74: no clue that they're not supposed

04:09:20 Speaker 74: to be going down most county

04:09:22 Speaker 74: roads. Okay. Thank you. Any other

04:09:25 Speaker 74: comments? Okay. All right. Then looks

04:09:27 Speaker 74: like we're ready to call the

04:09:29 Speaker 74: vote. All those in favour? And

04:09:33 Speaker 74: that motion is carried. Thank you.

04:09:35 Speaker 74: Okay, that allows us to go

04:09:37 Speaker 74: then to item seven, seven H,

04:09:40 Speaker 74: and we have our county solicitor

04:09:43 Speaker 74: on standby. It's recommended that

04:09:46 Speaker 74: report LSRCW zero one twenty six

04:09:48 Speaker 74: regarding the updated land acquisition and

04:09:51 Speaker 74: disposition policy be received, and that

04:09:54 Speaker 74: the updated land acquisition and disposition

04:09:56 Speaker 74: policy be approved as presented, and

04:09:59 Speaker 74: that G. Gen 003 Sale and

04:10:01 Speaker 74: Acquisition Land Policy of Land Policy

04:10:03 Speaker 74: and G Gen 003001 Sale of

04:10:05 Speaker 74: Land Procedure and G Gen 003002

04:10:06 Speaker 74: Acquisition of Land Procedure be rescinded.

04:10:10 Speaker 74: Okay, so what we'll do is

04:10:12 Speaker 74: I'm going to call for a

04:10:14 Speaker 74: mover and a seconder to get

04:10:16 Speaker 74: this on the floor for any

04:10:18 Speaker 74: open introduction, and then as I

04:10:21 Speaker 74: mentioned, we will then proceed into

04:10:23 Speaker 74: close. We will then proceed into

04:10:24 Speaker 74: closed session before we vote

04:10:27 Speaker 74: on the open session matter.

04:10:29 Speaker 74: So, with that, may I ask

04:10:31 Speaker 74: for a move and second, moved

04:10:33 Speaker 74: by Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the

04:10:35 Speaker 74: Deputy Warden. It's now on the

04:10:36 Speaker 74: floor for open discussion. And welcome,

04:10:38 Speaker 74: County Solicitor Morrison. All right. Good

04:10:40 Speaker 74: afternoon, and thank you, Madam Warden,

04:10:43 Speaker 74: County Council. So, the purpose of

04:10:45 Speaker 74: this report is to present Council

04:10:48 Speaker 74: with an updated land acquisition and

04:10:50 Speaker 74: disposition policy for consideration. and I

04:10:52 Speaker 74: would like to start off by

04:10:55 Speaker 74: thanking Lacey Thompson, our law clerk

04:10:57 Speaker 74: and real estate coordinator. She is

04:11:00 Speaker 74: here with us today to help

04:11:02 Speaker 74: us get any questions. But her

04:11:05 Speaker 74: hard work and dedication is why

04:11:07 Speaker 74: this is in front of us

04:11:09 Speaker 74: today. So the Municipal Act requires

04:11:11 Speaker 74: that municipalities adopt and maintain a

04:11:12 Speaker 74: policy with respect to the sale

04:11:14 Speaker 74: and disposition of land. Our current

04:11:18 Speaker 74: sale and acquisition of land policy

04:11:20 Speaker 74: and the two related procedures are

04:11:23 Speaker 74: from 2012. They were amended in

04:11:25 Speaker 74: 2014, and staff have reviewed the

04:11:28 Speaker 74: current policy and procedures and are

04:11:30 Speaker 74: recommending an updated policy for council's

04:11:33 Speaker 74: consideration. There have been significant changes

04:11:36 Speaker 74: that have been made, but generally

04:11:39 Speaker 74: the process will remain the same.

04:11:41 Speaker 74: There are some key exceptions that

04:11:43 Speaker 74: we'll go over, but the policy

04:11:46 Speaker 74: is intended to ensure that the

04:11:48 Speaker 74: land transaction process is fair, open,

04:11:49 Speaker 74: and transparent, while protecting the county's

04:11:51 Speaker 74: interests. So I will do. a

04:11:54 Speaker 74: high-level overview of the proposed changes,

04:11:56 Speaker 74: but happy to answer any questions

04:11:58 Speaker 74: on specific changes if you have

04:12:01 Speaker 74: them. So there was a fairly

04:12:03 Speaker 74: significant overall administrative update, which transitions

04:12:06 Speaker 74: the policy to the county's current

04:12:07 Speaker 74: policy template. So this consolidates the

04:12:10 Speaker 74: three documents into one policy document.

04:12:12 Speaker 74: The intent of this change is

04:12:15 Speaker 74: just to bring it up to

04:12:18 Speaker 74: our current policy template. The policy

04:12:20 Speaker 74: statement. the purpose, and the scope

04:12:23 Speaker 74: have all been updated, but the

04:12:25 Speaker 74: intent remains the same. We have

04:12:27 Speaker 74: added a table of contents

04:12:29 Speaker 74: for ease of reference. Section one,

04:12:31 Speaker 74: definitions and interpretation, have been updated

04:12:35 Speaker 74: to reflect the new policy.

04:12:37 Speaker 74: We have a new legislated requirements

04:12:39 Speaker 74: section, which is in accordance with

04:12:43 Speaker 74: the policy template. We have an

04:12:46 Speaker 74: updated exception section. This is to

04:12:47 Speaker 74: add clarity. We have a new.

04:12:50 Speaker 74: financial matters section. This is to

04:12:51 Speaker 74: bring us in line again with

04:12:54 Speaker 74: that new current county policy template.

04:12:55 Speaker 74: We have an updated value for

04:13:01 Speaker 74: land section, and there is a

04:13:03 Speaker 74: key change to highlight in this

04:13:05 Speaker 74: section, which is the addition of

04:13:06 Speaker 21: the staff value estimate method for

04:13:10 Speaker 21: land that is under seventy-five thousand.

04:13:12 Speaker 21: I will note that this does

04:13:13 Speaker 21: not permit staff proceed without council

04:13:16 Speaker 21: approval unless an exemption is found

04:13:18 Speaker 21: elsewhere in the policy. Section Six,

04:13:20 Speaker 21: valuation not required, has been updated,

04:13:22 Speaker 09: but the intent remains the same.

04:13:23 Speaker 09: We have an updated procedure for

04:13:25 Speaker 09: acquisition of land. Section, the intent

04:13:26 Speaker 09: remains the same, but we have

04:13:28 Speaker 09: expanded this for clarity. We have

04:13:29 Speaker 09: a new methods of acquisition section.

04:13:31 Speaker 09: The previous procedure combined procedure methods

04:13:33 Speaker 09: into one section and contained additional

04:13:35 Speaker 09: sections for some specific methods. but

04:13:36 Speaker 09: we expanded it into its own

04:13:37 Speaker 09: new section and added additional methods

04:13:39 Speaker 09: for clarity. Section nine, we have

04:13:41 Speaker 09: updated for the procedure of disposition.

04:13:43 Speaker 09: Again, same with the acquisition; the

04:13:46 Speaker 09: intent remains the same, but we

04:13:50 Speaker 09: have expanded it for clarity. We

04:13:51 Speaker 09: have an updated notice section under

04:13:53 Speaker 09: section ten. There is a key

04:13:54 Speaker 09: change to note in this section,

04:13:55 Speaker 09: where we have removed the requirement

04:13:56 Speaker 09: for newspaper publication as part of

04:13:58 Speaker 09: the notice requirements. The general circulation

04:13:59 Speaker 09: of newspapers has decreased, and finding

04:14:01 Speaker 09: a newspaper in the relevant geographic

04:14:02 Speaker 09: areas has become increasingly challenging. The

04:14:03 Speaker 09: cost for advertising has also increased,

04:14:04 Speaker 09: so we still would have notice,

04:14:05 Speaker 09: and depending on the method of

04:14:07 Speaker 09: sale, there may be additional notice.

04:14:13 Speaker 09: So we did give the example

04:14:14 Speaker 09: of real estates and their advertising

04:14:16 Speaker 09: and MLS postings and that kind

04:14:19 Speaker 09: of thing. We have an updated

04:14:20 Speaker 09: Section 11 for methods of disposition.

04:14:23 Speaker 09: The intent was to expand and.

04:14:23 Speaker 74: clarify the various methods here, and

04:14:24 Speaker 74: we have given it the example

04:14:26 Speaker 74: of depending on the method, there

04:14:29 Speaker 74: may be exemptions. So auctions, public

04:14:31 Speaker 74: tenders under five hundred thousand, and

04:14:33 Speaker 74: requests for proposals all have exemptions

04:14:35 Speaker 74: in them. But also noting that

04:14:37 Speaker 74: council approval would be required, so

04:14:40 Speaker 74: we'd come to council, ask for

04:14:42 Speaker 74: approval to go by one of

04:14:44 Speaker 74: those methods, and that's when the

04:14:46 Speaker 74: exemptions would kick in. So, section

04:14:48 Speaker 74: 12, we have a new special

04:14:50 Speaker 74: acquisition and dispositions category. This was

04:14:52 Speaker 74: to highlight some special categories that

04:14:54 Speaker 74: didn't cleanly fit in the other

04:14:55 Speaker 74: headings. And then we have a

04:14:58 Speaker 74: new delegation of authority section, which

04:15:00 Speaker 74: the previous land acquisition procedure had

04:15:03 Speaker 74: a delegated authority section, whereas the

04:15:05 Speaker 74: sale procedure was largely silent. So,

04:15:06 Speaker 74: this is to add some clarity

04:15:11 Speaker 74: for both the sale and acquisition,

04:15:12 Speaker 74: and we have. an updated Schedule

04:15:15 Speaker 74: A. There is a key change

04:15:16 Speaker 74: to note here, which is that

04:15:18 Speaker 09: we are proposing to increase the

04:15:19 Speaker 09: compensation amounts in the acquisition for

04:15:21 Speaker 09: road purposes to better reflect the

04:15:23 Speaker 09: current market conditions. So, as you

04:15:25 Speaker 09: can imagine, land values have increased

04:15:25 Speaker 09: significantly since 2012. Staff has found

04:15:27 Speaker 09: that the values in the current

04:15:29 Speaker 09: policy make it difficult to reach

04:15:30 Speaker 09: negotiated agreements without obtaining an appraisal

04:15:33 Speaker 09: or seeking additional direction from council.

04:15:36 Speaker 09: which costs additional resources and causes

04:15:38 Speaker 09: delays. The updated schedule also includes

04:15:44 Speaker 09: the new method for staff valuations

04:15:47 Speaker 09: for land under seventy-five thousand. The

04:15:50 Speaker 75: intent is to support our colleagues

04:15:52 Speaker 75: in transportation services in negotiating agreements

04:15:54 Speaker 75: with landowners for acquisitions required for

04:15:56 Speaker 76: road purposes. The ability to secure

04:15:57 Speaker 76: property efficiently can significantly affect project

04:16:02 Speaker 76: timing, and so these additions are

04:16:05 Speaker 76: intended to support successful, efficient, and

04:16:06 Speaker 76: effective. negotiations, and and then so

04:16:08 Speaker 27: as Madam Warden noted, we do

04:16:10 Speaker 27: have a closed session component here,

04:16:15 Speaker 27: and where we have a new

04:16:16 Speaker 27: property negotiation guide, but we propose

04:16:18 Speaker 27: to discuss that in close to

04:16:19 Speaker 27: protect our negotiation power. Okay, thank

04:16:23 Speaker 74: you for that introduction to open.

04:16:24 Speaker 74: So just before we go into

04:16:31 Speaker 74: close to be able to discuss

04:16:33 Speaker 74: the the final pieces of this

04:16:35 Speaker 77: consideration prior to voting on this

04:16:37 Speaker 77: in open. On this and open,

04:16:42 Speaker 77: if you have an open session

04:16:44 Speaker 77: question, please go ahead, Councillor McQueen.

04:16:46 Speaker 77: Thank you, Madam Warden, and I

04:16:48 Speaker 77: know that I remember I remember

04:16:50 Speaker 77: the two thousand and twelve report,

04:16:53 Speaker 77: and I remember there was two

04:16:55 Speaker 77: different values per acre per land

04:16:58 Speaker 77: or whatever. One was for the

04:17:00 Speaker 77: Blue Mountains, and then it was

04:17:02 Speaker 77: the rest of the Mississauga or

04:17:04 Speaker 74: the county. Now we've seen a

04:17:06 Speaker 74: lot of values change. One is

04:17:10 Speaker 74: farmland, like at most places, thirty

04:17:11 Speaker 74: thousand acre in farmland. Where farmland

04:17:13 Speaker 74: back in two thousand and twelve

04:17:15 Speaker 74: was probably less than ten or

04:17:16 Speaker 74: or more. so that has changed

04:17:17 Speaker 74: something. And I don't know, getting

04:17:21 Speaker 74: into details if you have. So

04:17:23 Speaker 74: you you still use an appraiser.

04:17:24 Speaker 74: Because the land value served the

04:17:25 Speaker 74: county is probably different than 2012,

04:17:27 Speaker 74: and it's probably all over the

04:17:29 Speaker 74: place. So I know you try

04:17:32 Speaker 74: to come, and I know a

04:17:33 Speaker 74: lot of times it's the appraiser

04:17:35 Speaker 74: that tries to get you that

04:17:36 Speaker 74: value. But I know it's, and

04:17:37 Speaker 74: sometimes if it's a small piece,

04:17:39 Speaker 74: you take whatever it is per

04:17:40 Speaker 74: acre divided by square footage, and

04:17:46 Speaker 74: you try to come up with

04:17:50 Speaker 74: that number. If they have anything

04:17:52 Speaker 74: to add, then. Sure. Thank you

04:17:55 Speaker 74: for the question. So I I

04:17:58 Speaker 74: agree with you that it is

04:18:01 Speaker 69: difficult to narrow down a specific

04:18:02 Speaker 69: base price that applies across the

04:18:05 Speaker 69: county. We did try to do

04:18:07 Speaker 69: that, and that's part of the

04:18:12 Speaker 69: reason it took so long to

04:18:13 Speaker 69: get this report back is that

04:18:15 Speaker 69: we couldn't. So with Schedule A,

04:18:17 Speaker 69: it's for those smaller pieces for

04:18:21 Speaker 69: row purposes where we have set

04:18:23 Speaker 69: a compensation rate in there. But

04:18:26 Speaker 69: that's why we have also added

04:18:29 Speaker 69: the staff. So added the staff

04:18:30 Speaker 69: valuation method because we recognize, like

04:18:34 Speaker 69: our friends in Blue Mountains, their

04:18:37 Speaker 69: land values may differ. So the

04:18:41 Speaker 69: the base compensation rate that's included

04:18:43 Speaker 69: in Schedule A may not always

04:18:46 Speaker 69: be appropriate. So by adding that

04:18:47 Speaker 69: staff valuation method, it gives transportation

04:18:49 Speaker 74: a bit more freedom to be

04:18:53 Speaker 74: able to negotiate up to that

04:18:55 Speaker 74: seventy five thousand. But of course,

04:18:57 Speaker 74: if if we don't have the

04:18:58 Speaker 74: comparators, or if we decide that

04:19:01 Speaker 74: it's over the seventy five, then

04:19:03 Speaker 74: we would be looking at getting

04:19:04 Speaker 74: appraisers or looking at different value

04:19:05 Speaker 74: methods. Just an example, you could

04:19:14 Speaker 74: be road widening a section of

04:19:15 Speaker 74: of a county road that hasn't

04:19:17 Speaker 78: had the road widening, and you'll

04:19:19 Speaker 78: be going along all those farms.

04:19:21 Speaker 78: And if they're valued at thirty

04:19:23 Speaker 21: dollars an acre, you may have

04:19:24 Speaker 21: the it may be much different

04:19:25 Speaker 21: today than it would have been

04:19:28 Speaker 21: a long time ago, just because

04:19:30 Speaker 21: of those land values and the

04:19:32 Speaker 21: loss of land as well. If

04:19:34 Speaker 21: you're road widening, you're taking seventeen

04:19:36 Speaker 21: feet, going from sixty-six to hundred

04:19:38 Speaker 21: hundred feet, right? That adds up.

04:19:40 Speaker 21: So, yeah, thank you. Okay. Other

04:19:42 Speaker 21: questions, comments? Okay. We'll go to

04:19:45 Speaker 21: Councillor Eccles. Just quickly, you mentioned

04:19:47 Speaker 21: the seventy-five thousand, but in that

04:19:49 Speaker 21: seventy-five thousand, if it does go

04:19:51 Speaker 21: above the seventy-five thousand, you still

04:19:54 Speaker 21: don't need to go with that,

04:19:55 Speaker 21: unless there's another exemption someplace. I'm

04:19:57 Speaker 21: just kind of lost. Is it

04:20:00 Speaker 21: 75? That's the cutoff point, but it's not the cutoff point the way this reads right now. Am I interpreting that right? So the intention would be that if we're using the staff valuation method, we would only be using that if the land is under 75,000. If it's over 75, then we'd be looking at different valuation methods. So I'm misinterpreting that. because in here it says anything over seventy-five thousand it would be a different unless it qualifies for another for a different exemption. So you're telling me anything over no, got to go with the valuation. But the way this reads, it says no. If there's another exemption, then we can keep going the way we are over seventy-five. That's my that's where I want clarity. Thank you, and I think there's. a blanket if there's any exemptions that apply to the broad policy. So an example might be if it's a disposition or acquisition between municipalities, that kind of thing, where the value might be over, but there might be an exemption otherwise, where we don't actually need to get this property valued because it's between municipalities. So if there is an exemption where it's not needing to be valued, that kind of thing would be an exemption that would hit if it was potentially over seventy-five thousand. is so there is that broader exemption. If you can find an exemption in this policy, then might not need to get it valued. But if we're using the staff value method because we need a valuation, then we'd be using that for under seventy-five. Okay. Did I see Councillor Craig? My question was is really just ensuring that staff still have flexibility. Agricultural is easy to to utilise as an example. Utilises an example because it's most prevalent, but if you are working at sight lines on an intersection expansion, for instance, and there's a slightly treed lot or or scrub brush, the policy here allows the county to still dig in and be like, "Yeah, that has been scrub brush or treed for 50 years. You've never treated as ag land, which is more valuable," and then pumps. And pumps the price up. Do we still have that supreme discretion to be, or hazard lands, or some sort of more passive use than a higher value assessment, such as agriculture? Thank you for the question. And the intent is to still allow flexibility in specific examples. We'd be looking at each on a case-by-case basis. So if there are complicating things, I don't know that we. would be doing a staff value ourselves, and it might be one where we get an appraiser to get that type type of an opinion. But that would just be something that we look at on a case by case basis. Okay. Any other questions? Okay, I'm not seeing any further questions here. So let's look at the close going into close session, and then we will conclude with a vote on this matter. The vote on this matter. So it's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to section 239-2 of the Municipal Act 2001 as amended to discuss number one, labour relations or employee negotiations, and this is with regards to OPSU for Grey Gables and Lee Manor, and number two, a position plan procedure criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. with regards to land sale and acquisition negotiations. May I ask for a mover and a seconder? Moved by Councillor Patterson, seconded by Councillor Hutchison. We'll take all those in favour.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.