Sorry, I will move the goal posts a little. There was no fair primary.

Read the Ballot Access Denial subsection of the controversies section on your link.

The aspect of game theory people who espouse it as their rational for voting blue no matter who only applies to games that occur only once.

What strategy wins in the long term over multiple plays is exactly opposite what they espouse and is closer, though not entirely, the strategy espoused by the people they argue against.

We have elections on a repeated basis.

What primaries? No one voted for Harris in any 2024 primaries.

Hell, then DNC told States that allowed other candidates in the primary ballots that they wouldn’t be counted.

There was no fucking primary. Funny how the ignorant that like to write about game theory like to point to the non-existent primaries as the only appropriate time to try to push the party to the left.

Don’t use the words game theory and harm reduction. You clearly don’t know anything about either.

You are literally ignoring all of game theory based around games with repeated plays. Why? Because it shows the opposite strategy then what you are promoting works better.

When people point out that your vaunted game theory proves you wrong, that is when the phrase harm reduction comes out so you don’t have to argue against people correctly pointing out that your strategy fails in the long term.

It’s not clever, nor is it subtle.

Technically that is basically what all trees are.

Trees are the crabs of the vegetable world.