I agree with this sentiment, governments do not represent the citizens but the capital of those nations. Which often times devolves to simply, what can you do for me?

The ability to enforce double standards based on political affiliation is a big feature of fascist governments.

CPC saying they want to collaborate while they send another MP to bend the knee at one of Trumps prayer breakfasts on the taxpayer dime.

I predict PP said something like this… “You better give Trump what he wants because we’ve spent the last year lobbying the Trump regime, convincing them that Canada would be an easier target than Greenland, and we will support him if he tries to replace you.”

This is normal for the CPC same thing happened in London Ontario during the last election.

If CPC supporters are contacting her saying this isn’t what this party represents, then they haven’t been paying any attention to what their party has been saying over the last decade. Not that it’s surprising at all, the Reform wing of the CPC simply erased what was left of PC influence in the party over the pandemic. Which is how they’ve been trying to market extreme ideas to moderate voters, by just lying to them.

Political actors want to paint this as a failure of the federal government but fact of the matter is, it was a failure of enforcement, and we simply do not have the means in which to hold that enforcement accountable the same way we do the federal government, which is another issue entirely.

We should have high standards for the EA’s use, but the same people who will justify state sponsored violence that targets people they don’t like, are celebrating this ruling as government overreach, because it’s about the narrative not reality, and I find it exhausting.

Police should’ve done their jobs and the federal government shouldn’t have used the act, that’s the real story.