Why would they need to fundraise so much of they actually had policies that help people?

Well, it’s not an either or situation. It’s support the party of genocide, or the party of genocide and paedophilia. Easy choice. Even if it’s distasteful.

Given this was all predictable, why wasn’t that letter sent pre emptively. They should have asserted it before the claim was made. Now it seems reasonable to reschedule, so it’s just a further delay.

Oof. That’s a depressing and prescient comment.

Just like other past irregularities, mild repurcussions after the fact is too late when the election is already stolen.

That’s my point. When you lose your humanity, you are no better. The whole point of fascism is to ‘other’ different in and out groups. Exactly what you’re doing, to the point where you think terrorism is ok.

You’re conflating state sponsored violence with random Nazi supporters joking them as private malitia.

Absolutely violence should not be avoided where violence is already being used. However, by all account these nazis were protestors, not the agents of the government.

Nazis are still people and there is still a spectrum of violence and beliefs. In the Nazi bar analogy, they all end up being nazis by virtue of association and tolerance of Nazi views. You’re making the leap to all being Nazis immediately.

Non violent far right protestors have the right to protest and their beliefs. Where they have already perpetrated violence, they should receive it in kind or, ideally prosecution.

The use of IED is not that and just normalises it’s use. Which side has the bigger propensity for violence and bombing of unarmed civilians?

The Dems and the left have a problem where they tut tut and pearl clutch rather than taking action. Jumping to bombing protests is not the answer, however distasteful those protests are.

Terrorism with IEDs is a threat to safety of all and to democracy, even if it is directed at nazis.

Also, what do you think the Nazis do next?