Pushing back against something that’s harmful to society isn’t wrong. Deeper AI may be coming whether we like it or not, but it’s insane to discredit the idea that railing against unethical usage and implementation is pointless. Your argument that the person using it in this insurance is guiltless is just not correct. They are contributing to a product that is undeniably harmful to the environment and obliquity harmful to actual artists and content creators in general
Pushing back against something that’s harmful to society isn’t wrong. Deeper AI may be coming whether we like it or not, but it’s insane to discredit the idea that railing against unethical usage and implementation is pointless. Your argument that the person using it in this insurance is guiltless is just not correct. They are contributing to a product that is undeniably harmful to the environment and obliquity harmful to actual artists and content creators in general