No. Personal experience isn’t science. Your demand that I provide scientific proof of personal experience is absurd and just your bad faith way to totally dismiss it.
Can you prove to me with a scientific argument and data that you are leftist? Or that you are a true leftist? Or am I just supposed to ‘believe’ your self-reporting? I’m confident your sample size for your political beliefs and experiences consists of one.
you are delusional if you think there aren’t hateful awful people on the left who think violence is a means to an end of theor political and social goals. lots of leftists here are insane people with insane views, that are often pro-violence, and pro-hatred. lots of those leftists are swept up hateful narratives about men, the working-class, and other identity group bullshit that they ironically also cling to as a means of asserting their own political/moral superiority.
being left/right has nothing to do with being a shitty and violent person. if you think it does, well I will assume you are one of the leftists who think’s violence and hatred are totally justified as long as it’s against your ‘enemies’.
and that’s cool man. go be an leftist extremist if you want. but if you pretend that it’s only a problem when the right wing does it, you’re no different than the right wingers you hate.
and your argument is guilt by assocation. ‘oh this other person said this thing i don’t like so therefore you are bad’. No. Right, and if right-wingers went on about how rape is bad, would any woman who talked about her expereince being raped also now be a right-winger? Jesus.
Frankly, I am talking about people exactly like you. You are the type of hateful angry leftist who is alienating people from your cause. Who dismiss and attack and harass anyone who doesn’t fit your overly simplistic narrative, with your crappy bad faith ‘arguments’. You take the ‘prove it’ flat earther bullshit approach, because it makes you feel BIG and SMART, because you’re completely the opposite.
No. Personal experience isn’t science. Your demand that I provide scientific proof of personal experience is absurd and just your bad faith way to totally dismiss it.
Can you prove to me with a scientific argument and data that you are leftist? Or that you are a true leftist? Or am I just supposed to ‘believe’ your self-reporting? I’m confident your sample size for your political beliefs and experiences consists of one.
You’ve made claims, I asked you to provide information that backs it up.
So you’re here spouting the same lines that right wing podcasters did a decade ago with about as much backing you.
Be better than rethoric that is a decade old.
because it’s true.
you are delusional if you think there aren’t hateful awful people on the left who think violence is a means to an end of theor political and social goals. lots of leftists here are insane people with insane views, that are often pro-violence, and pro-hatred. lots of those leftists are swept up hateful narratives about men, the working-class, and other identity group bullshit that they ironically also cling to as a means of asserting their own political/moral superiority.
being left/right has nothing to do with being a shitty and violent person. if you think it does, well I will assume you are one of the leftists who think’s violence and hatred are totally justified as long as it’s against your ‘enemies’.
and that’s cool man. go be an leftist extremist if you want. but if you pretend that it’s only a problem when the right wing does it, you’re no different than the right wingers you hate.
and your argument is guilt by assocation. ‘oh this other person said this thing i don’t like so therefore you are bad’. No. Right, and if right-wingers went on about how rape is bad, would any woman who talked about her expereince being raped also now be a right-winger? Jesus.
Frankly, I am talking about people exactly like you. You are the type of hateful angry leftist who is alienating people from your cause. Who dismiss and attack and harass anyone who doesn’t fit your overly simplistic narrative, with your crappy bad faith ‘arguments’. You take the ‘prove it’ flat earther bullshit approach, because it makes you feel BIG and SMART, because you’re completely the opposite.
Wah wah wah, bla bla bla.
Your rethoric is bad and you should feel bad.
You’ve made claims and provided no backing data.
Why should I entertain any idea you spout if you are unwilling to substantiate them?