

You’ve made claims, I asked you to provide information that backs it up.
So you’re here spouting the same lines that right wing podcasters did a decade ago with about as much backing you.
Be better than rethoric that is a decade old.
If we are in an argument, ask yourself: “does looking at my post history help your point or hurt it?”


You’ve made claims, I asked you to provide information that backs it up.
So you’re here spouting the same lines that right wing podcasters did a decade ago with about as much backing you.
Be better than rethoric that is a decade old.


I’m sorry those two things are separate how?
Your sample size and methodology is suspect. Can you share more data other than “I feel”?


The left needs to give people simple answers
How is tax the rich at the same rate as everyone else difficult?
How is universal healthcare convoluted?


Because fascism feeds into a sense of entitlement. If you listen to any of them, it’s the grievances of white men who do not want to share.


As someone who was a teenager when the internet became a thing, I agree there should be a debate on the topic. Because as I see it, our brains got broken differently after the internet.
There is a healthy way to approach this. There is a minimum age for social media. Buuuut… I’m not the one who should be saying what that is.


What a fucking embarrassment.


Most people in this country don’t understand the self defense laws and PP is banking on his base not checking to see if he’s lying.
This is a dog whistle and the “castle laws” that he wants to bring in lead to 60 y/o dudes shooting teens through their front door because they shit their slacks.
Wah wah wah, bla bla bla.
Your rethoric is bad and you should feel bad.
You’ve made claims and provided no backing data.
Why should I entertain any idea you spout if you are unwilling to substantiate them?