Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — August 13, 2026
Hook: 175000 Sogin Hospice Facility Budget
Grey County · Committee of the Whole · August 13, 2026
Summary
The Committee of the Whole convened to process consent items and advance several substantive reports on budgetary requests, service delivery plans, and community infrastructure initiatives before adjourning. Key discussions focused on emergency response protocols, housing support funding, and the financial implications of expanding healthcare services in rural areas.
Top Newsworthy Developments
- Rural Response Times and Hospital Offloading: Council members questioned the Medical Priority Dispatch System regarding a 15-minute average response time in rural Ontario, where geography and rising call volumes create pinch points. Officials explained that resources are strategically matched to density using GIS teams to update maps for new developments, though private roads sometimes delay updates.
- Council Approved a Transition to the Medical Priority Dispatch System That Refines: Council approved a transition to the Medical Priority Dispatch System that refines existing ambulance dispatch practices using colour-coded priorities instead of simple numbers. The new system allows lower priority calls to be held while higher priority emergencies are dispatched immediately, though paramedics noted this can still cause delays for non-immediate cases.
- Scott Taylor Proposed Adding the County Community Improvement Plan As a Project: Council considered an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan for Grey County to support affordable housing and transit corridors within the ten-year capital budget. The proposal suggests including related costs in the development charges background study and phasing the project through analysis, capacity evaluation, and programme design.
- County Considers Upper-tier Community Improvement Plan for Affordable Housing Incentives: Council members debated establishing an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan to provide flexible incentives for affordable housing development. Speakers noted that current funding rules restrict direct support for nonprofits and land acquisition, whereas a CIP would allow the county to waive restrictions or use surplus funds more nimbly.
- Council Considers $175,000 Sogin Hospice Funding: Council considered a motion to include a $175,000 request from Sogin Hospice Inc. for building a hospice in Gray County within the 2027 budget, funded over five years at $35,000 annually from the healthcare reserve without adding to the levy.
- FR-CW-19-26 Heath Care Funding Request 2027 Budget: Council considered a motion to include a $175,000 request from Sogin Hospice Inc. for building a hospice in Gray County within the 2027 budget, funded over five years at $35,000 annually from the healthcare reserve without adding to the levy.
Key Topics & Sections
Meeting Details
- Jurisdiction
- Grey County
- Body
- Committee of the Whole
- Date
- August 13, 2026
- Transcript Status
- Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
- Official Source
- View official meeting page
- Agenda Page
- View agenda page
- Original Video
- View original meeting video
- Meeting Portal
- View eScribe meeting page
Related Discussion
HelpOS discussion thread link pending.
Transcript Notice
This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.
It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.
For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.
Full Transcript
1 Call to Order
The committee called to order on August 13, 2026, with no declarations of interest raised. Discussion regarding the consent agenda identified specific items for separate consideration before proceeding. A motion was moved to receive the remaining consent agenda items and authorise staff actions accordingly. The motion was seconded and carried without further discussion. The committee then adjourned briefly before reconvening later in the day.
01:06:42 Speaker 02: so I'd like to call to
01:06:44 Speaker 02: order this committee the whole. of
01:06:46 Speaker 02: August thirteenth, twenty twenty-six. At this
01:06:47 Speaker 02: point in time, I'll put out
01:06:49 Speaker 02: a call if there are any
01:06:51 Speaker 02: declarations of interest. Seeing no hands
01:06:54 Speaker 02: raised, we'll move on. Business arising
01:06:55 Speaker 02: from minutes, we have healthy discussion
01:06:57 Speaker 02: on minutes. Delegations, we do not
01:07:00 Speaker 02: have any today, and so we'll
01:07:03 Speaker 02: go to item five: determination of
01:07:06 Speaker 02: items requiring separate discussion. On the
01:07:08 Speaker 02: consent agenda listed in six, we
01:07:09 Speaker 02: have seven different items listed. So
01:07:11 Speaker 02: I'll ask if you. could identify
01:07:13 Speaker 02: any items you wish to have
01:07:14 Speaker 02: a separate discussion for, Councillor Gregg.
01:07:15 Speaker 02: Six C, just for a point
01:09:49 Speaker 03: of a question. Thanks. So, question
01:13:37 Speaker 03: for six C, so we'll pull
01:19:33 Speaker 03: that one separately. Anything else, Councillor
01:19:34 Speaker 01: McQueen? Thank you, Madam Warden. Yes,
01:19:35 Speaker 01: six F. Okay, six F. Anything
01:19:53 Speaker 01: else? Okay, I'm not seeing any
01:19:55 Speaker 01: further hands. Therefore, we'll just tidy
01:19:57 Speaker 03: up then the consent agenda. It's
01:19:59 Speaker 02: recommended that the following consent agenda
01:20:02 Speaker 02: items be received, and that staff
01:20:03 Speaker 02: be authorised to take actions necessary
01:20:05 Speaker 02: to give effect to the recommendations
01:20:07 Speaker 02: in the staff reports, and that
01:20:10 Speaker 02: the correspondence be supported or received
01:20:12 Speaker 02: for information as recommended in the
01:20:15 Speaker 02: consent agenda. It will be all
01:20:16 Speaker 02: items less item 6C, as in
01:20:18 Speaker 02: cat, and F, as in frog.
01:20:20 Speaker 02: May I ask for a mover
01:20:22 Speaker 02: to secondeer? Move by. Moved by
01:20:23 Speaker 02: Councillor Eccles, seconded by Councillor Mackie.
01:20:25 Speaker 02: Any discussion? All those in favour?
01:20:26 Speaker 02: And that motion is carried. Thank
01:20:28 Speaker 02: you. So let's take a break
01:20:29 Speaker 02: now until eleven ten, and then
01:20:32 Speaker 02: we'll carry on with the remainder
01:20:34 Speaker 02: of our agenda in the morning
01:20:37 Speaker 02: and see where we are by
01:20:41 Speaker 02: twelve fifteen. Okay. Could I please
01:20:43 Speaker 02: invite all of our committee, the
01:20:47 Speaker 24: whole members, back to the horseshoe?
01:20:50 Speaker 24: Okay, so we are reconvening after
01:20:52 Speaker 24: our break, and we are at
7.a Community Services Committee minutes dated August 6, 2026
The Community Services Committee reviewed minutes recommending the adoption of a new systems planning analyst position to address provincial IT modernization mandates and childcare compliance requirements. The committee also discussed Canada Ontario Community Housing initiatives, including a requirement to build 15 new units and expand rent supplements to 12 total.
01:20:55 Speaker 24: item seven A, and this is
01:20:57 Speaker 24: with regards to Community Services
01:21:00 Speaker 24: Committee minutes. And in a
01:21:03 Speaker 24: moment, we'll call up Director Shaw
01:21:04 Speaker 24: to speak to that. So it's
01:21:06 Speaker 24: recommended that the Community Services Committee
01:21:09 Speaker 24: minutes dated August six, twenty twenty
01:21:11 Speaker 24: six, be adopted as presented, and
01:21:14 Speaker 24: that the following resolutions contained therein
01:21:15 Speaker 24: be endorsed. There are a number
01:21:17 Speaker 24: of them that have been. outlined
01:21:19 Speaker 24: and highlighted here in the circulated
01:21:20 Speaker 24: agenda that's been made public and
01:21:23 Speaker 24: circulated to all committee, the whole
01:21:25 Speaker 24: members. So at this point in
01:21:27 Speaker 24: time, I will look for a
01:21:32 Speaker 24: mover and a seconder. We've got
01:21:33 Speaker 24: a move by Councillor Hutchison, seconded
01:21:35 Speaker 24: by Councillor Doreen. So it's now
01:21:38 Speaker 24: on the floor for discussion. Welcome,
01:21:40 Speaker 24: Director Shaw. Thank you, Madam Warden,
01:21:41 Speaker 24: and good morning, County Council. Starting
01:21:43 Speaker 24: off with the first recommendation, it
01:21:46 Speaker 24: is our community service Our community
01:21:49 Speaker 24: services systems planning and compliance analyst
01:21:51 Speaker 24: position. The Ministry of Education has
01:21:54 Speaker 24: a provincially mandated modernization initiatives over
01:21:57 Speaker 24: the next five years. They're looking
01:22:00 Speaker 24: at increasing requirements for IT modernization,
01:22:03 Speaker 24: data management, compliance monitoring, and performance
01:22:04 Speaker 24: measures. This is actually a really
01:22:07 Speaker 24: good news story. We do not
01:22:09 Speaker 24: have a centralized wait list for
01:22:11 Speaker 24: childcare in anywhere in the
01:22:13 Speaker 24: province, and so right now, majority
01:22:16 Speaker 24: of people that are looking for
01:22:18 Speaker 24: childcare would have to put an
01:22:21 Speaker 24: application into all of the existing
01:22:22 Speaker 24: childcare centres out there, rather than
01:22:25 Speaker 24: having one centralized area to do
01:22:29 Speaker 24: it. There are many other options
01:22:31 Speaker 24: when it comes to early on
01:22:33 Speaker 24: programmemes standardizing, taking, scanning people in
01:22:35 Speaker 24: and out of the programmemes. So
01:22:37 Speaker 24: there's a lot of that other
01:22:39 Speaker 24: security and safety aspects of it.
01:22:41 Speaker 24: The province is looking at this
01:22:43 Speaker 24: taking about three to five years,
01:22:45 Speaker 24: and there are five different phases.
01:22:48 Speaker 24: The first phase is starting this
01:22:50 Speaker 24: September and will continue on until
01:22:53 Speaker 24: September of 2027. And that is
01:22:54 Speaker 24: again modernizing our early on. We
01:22:56 Speaker 24: are looking at a position in
01:22:58 Speaker 24: order to do this. The position
01:23:00 Speaker 24: itself is proposed to to also
01:23:04 Speaker 24: expand to all of our services
01:23:05 Speaker 24: and community services. So, for instance,
01:23:07 Speaker 24: in 2027, we're going to have
01:23:09 Speaker 24: a review under the MMNH. So,
01:23:11 Speaker 24: I'm sure there's going to be
01:23:15 Speaker 24: modernization recommendations coming from that, and
01:23:18 Speaker 24: also our housing and homelessness plan.
01:23:23 Speaker 24: So developing and dashboards and having
01:23:24 Speaker 24: a way of us to report
01:23:26 Speaker 24: on a number of our initiatives.
01:23:27 Speaker 24: Along with this comes increased data
01:23:29 Speaker 24: collection from the province, and as
01:23:31 Speaker 24: part of the C. Well programme,
01:23:32 Speaker 24: we are at now asking our
01:23:34 Speaker 24: childcare centres to put together business
01:23:36 Speaker 24: plans and do a lot of
01:23:38 Speaker 24: financial work and audit. Financial work
01:23:39 Speaker 24: and auditing that didn't happen in
01:23:40 Speaker 24: the past, and this position will
01:23:46 Speaker 24: also help some of our smaller
01:23:48 Speaker 24: smaller centres in order to meet
01:23:51 Speaker 24: those regulatory requirements now from from
01:23:53 Speaker 02: the province. The funding we did
01:23:54 Speaker 02: receive funding from the Ministry of
01:23:55 Speaker 02: Education in order to assist with
01:23:59 Speaker 02: that. We received forty six thousand
01:24:01 Speaker 02: dollars for two thousand and twenty
01:24:03 Speaker 02: six, but that is prorated.
01:24:07 Speaker 24: There will be a different amount
01:24:09 Speaker 24: coming for twenty twenty seven, and
01:24:14 Speaker 24: we also received some additional funding.
01:24:17 Speaker 24: Some additional funds in early on
01:24:19 Speaker 24: for next year, also as administrative
01:24:20 Speaker 24: funds. The position itself will be
01:24:24 Speaker 24: looking at salary, benefits, supplies, materials,
01:24:26 Speaker 24: travel, a computer, cell phone, all
01:24:30 Speaker 24: of that around the hundred
01:24:32 Speaker 24: and fifty thousand dollars. So there
01:24:34 Speaker 24: are no levy dollars at this
01:24:36 Speaker 24: point going into it. And if
01:24:38 Speaker 24: at some time in the next
01:24:39 Speaker 24: five years it is required, we
01:24:41 Speaker 24: do have mitigation funds that we
01:24:43 Speaker 24: could use for that. And I'm
01:24:45 Speaker 24: happy to answer. questions about that.
01:24:47 Speaker 24: Or would you like me to
01:24:50 Speaker 24: continue with them all, Madam Warden?
01:24:53 Speaker 24: Let me see. Why don't we
01:24:55 Speaker 24: let's try to contain our discussion.
01:24:57 Speaker 24: So let's go ahead and just
01:24:58 Speaker 24: present everything, and we'll just we'll
01:25:01 Speaker 24: zero back to what it is
01:25:04 Speaker 24: people would like to talk to.
01:25:05 Speaker 24: Thank you. Thank you. So the
01:25:08 Speaker 24: next one on the list is
01:25:09 Speaker 24: our Canada Ontario Community Housing Initiatives
01:25:11 Speaker 24: in Ontario. priorities, housing initiatives, investment
01:25:14 Speaker 24: plans. These are 100% provincial funded.
01:25:15 Speaker 24: We did receive our allocation for
01:25:18 Speaker 24: this year. Normally, we do have
01:25:21 Speaker 24: it before budget, but this year
01:25:23 Speaker 24: and last year, we did not.
01:25:25 Speaker 24: These funds are to protect the
01:25:27 Speaker 24: long-term viability of community housing by
01:25:28 Speaker 24: supporting ongoing repairs, supporting end-of-operating agreements,
01:25:31 Speaker 24: and expanding the stock. We normally
01:25:32 Speaker 24: work. with our nonprofits with these
01:25:33 Speaker 24: funds too, in order to provide
01:25:37 Speaker 24: any capital repair funds that might
01:25:40 Speaker 24: be available to them. As part
01:25:42 Speaker 24: of the national housing strategy, we
01:25:46 Speaker 24: also have a requirement of fifteen
01:25:48 Speaker 24: new units in order to meet
01:25:50 Speaker 24: the funding requirements for the province.
01:25:52 Speaker 24: We are proposing to keep our
01:25:55 Speaker 24: rent supplement programme going. Right now,
01:25:57 Speaker 24: we have forty-five rent supplements that
01:25:58 Speaker 24: we provide, and we're going to
01:26:01 Speaker 24: add two new rent or twelve
01:26:03 Speaker 24: new rent supplements as a total.
01:26:06 Speaker 24: towards that fifteen, we're looking at
01:26:10 Speaker 24: five hundred thousand dollars towards our
01:26:12 Speaker 24: capital build in Dundalk, and that
01:26:14 Speaker 24: would provide for three new units.
01:26:16 Speaker 24: And of course, our community housing
01:26:17 Speaker 24: repairs funds at about three hundred
01:26:18 Speaker 24: and thirteen, and those would go
01:26:20 Speaker 24: towards funding needs in ourselves, emergency
01:26:23 Speaker 24: funding needs, or funding needs for
01:26:24 Speaker 24: our nonprofits. Part of our priority
01:26:26 Speaker 24: housing would be our rental supplements
01:26:28 Speaker 24: again, and we also put a
01:26:30 Speaker 24: ten percent allocation to be used
01:26:32 Speaker 24: towards support services. ten percent is
01:26:35 Speaker 24: the highest that we can go
01:26:36 Speaker 24: according to that fund. Our next
01:26:40 Speaker 24: item is Gariffraxa Nonprofit Homes. These
01:26:41 Speaker 24: are one of our nine nonprofits
01:26:42 Speaker 15: that we support. So through the
01:26:44 Speaker 15: Housing Services Act, we have a
01:26:45 Speaker 15: number of not for profits that
01:26:46 Speaker 15: the county supports, and these are
01:26:48 Speaker 15: one of them. They had a
01:26:53 Speaker 15: sinkhole in their parking lot as
01:26:59 Speaker 15: part of all that rain we
01:27:02 Speaker 25: had back in April, and there
01:27:04 Speaker 25: were needs repair needs for the
01:27:07 Speaker 25: retaining wall and also for the
01:27:12 Speaker 17: driveway itself. The we the repairs
01:27:13 Speaker 17: are costing two hundred and seventy
01:27:15 Speaker 17: five thousand dollars. They do have
01:27:19 Speaker 17: some funds available, but they also
01:27:22 Speaker 17: have other capital needs that are
01:27:25 Speaker 17: coming up. So they approached the
01:27:27 Speaker 17: county to see if we could
01:27:29 Speaker 17: provide any extra or any funding
01:27:33 Speaker 17: towards it. We proposed one hundred
01:27:38 Speaker 17: and twenty five thousand dollars. We
01:27:40 Speaker 17: have seventy five thousand dollars that
01:27:41 Speaker 17: we're going to. use from our
01:27:44 Speaker 17: nonprofit housing general reserve and fifty
01:27:46 Speaker 17: thousand dollars from the Cochi initiatives
01:27:49 Speaker 26: that I just talked about. And
01:27:49 Speaker 26: I'm happy to answer any questions.
01:27:51 Speaker 26: Okay, thank you. So I'll put
01:27:54 Speaker 26: it out. If there are any
01:27:56 Speaker 26: questions from members of the committee,
01:27:59 Speaker 26: the whole, perhaps you can refer
01:28:01 Speaker 26: to if it's item one, two,
01:28:02 Speaker 26: or three to help clarify, and
01:28:04 Speaker 26: then we'll look into that. Any
01:28:08 Speaker 26: questions? Okay, we'll begin with Councillor
01:28:10 Speaker 26: Ackles. And through you, Madam Warden,
01:28:11 Speaker 26: and probably to Terret, has really
01:28:12 Speaker 26: nothing to do with your report
01:28:17 Speaker 26: whatsoever, Emery. It has to do
01:28:22 Speaker 26: with just procedural. I noticed at
01:28:25 Speaker 26: the end of the meeting, the
01:28:27 Speaker 22: meeting was adjourned by Councillor Debrine,
01:28:29 Speaker 22: made the motion, and the chair
01:28:31 Speaker 22: seconded the motion. Procedurally, can the
01:28:32 Speaker 22: chair move and second? The chair
01:28:41 Speaker 22: move in second motions, and that's
01:28:43 Speaker 22: why I'm looking towards Tara and
01:28:45 Speaker 22: Marie, not you. Okay, I'll look
01:28:48 Speaker 22: to Madam Clerk. Thank you, and
01:28:49 Speaker 22: through you, Madam Warden. I do
01:28:51 Speaker 22: not know the answer to that
01:28:55 Speaker 27: offhand. It's certainly something that I
01:28:57 Speaker 27: can look into. I did glance
01:29:03 Speaker 27: our procedural bylaw, and it's it
01:29:07 Speaker 27: doesn't speak to that. So I
01:29:08 Speaker 27: think the answer is probably somewhere
01:29:10 Speaker 15: in Roberts' Rules of Order. I
01:29:11 Speaker 15: know. that our procedure bylaw, though
01:29:14 Speaker 15: it doesn't speak to it, some
01:29:17 Speaker 15: municipalities, the chair, I believe, their
01:29:18 Speaker 15: procedure bylaw allows for the chair
01:29:20 Speaker 15: to adjourn meetings, but it is
01:29:21 Speaker 15: unclear to me what proper protocol
01:29:23 Speaker 15: would be in our in our
01:29:26 Speaker 15: circumstances. So I can certainly look
01:29:30 Speaker 15: into that. I think we we
01:29:33 Speaker 15: would have fun looking into that
01:29:35 Speaker 15: for you. Okay, thank you, Councillor
01:29:40 Speaker 15: Nielsen. Thank you for. Thank you
01:29:42 Speaker 15: very much, Word Microsoft, to Councillor
01:29:43 Speaker 15: Eccles. If my motion to adjourn
01:29:44 Speaker 15: was incorrect, I apologize for the
01:29:46 Speaker 15: world record of the longest Community
01:29:48 Speaker 15: Services Committee, as it is still
01:29:51 Speaker 15: currently running. Thank you. Anything else,
01:29:53 Speaker 15: Councillor McQueen? I just to follow
01:29:54 Speaker 15: up to the question. I know
01:29:57 Speaker 28: with procedure, I know with our
01:29:58 Speaker 28: grey hands, we allow the chair
01:30:00 Speaker 28: to second, but one. To second,
01:30:02 Speaker 28: but won't allow the chair to
01:30:21 Speaker 28: move. So you may be the
01:30:23 Speaker 28: meeting may be over. Thank you.
01:30:26 Speaker 29: Okay, so if there's no further
01:30:33 Speaker 28: discussion or questions for Director Shaw,
01:30:36 Speaker 28: I'll call the question. Then all
01:30:37 Speaker 28: those in favour, that motion is
01:30:39 Speaker 28: carried. Thank you very much, Director
01:30:40 Speaker 28: Shaw. Okay, so we're going to
01:30:42 Speaker 28: move on now to item seven
01:30:43 Speaker 28: B, and in fact, we're going
01:30:46 Speaker 28: to in. 7B, C, and D,
01:30:47 Speaker 28: we're going to see a lot
01:30:52 Speaker 28: of Director McNabb. So let's get
01:30:54 Speaker 28: started on on this part here.
7.b PSR-CW-04-26 Response Time Plan for 2027
The Council considers a proposal to approve and submit the 2027 response time performance plan to the relevant ministry. Staff present historical data showing consistent adherence to established targets for emergency scene arrival times. A comprehensive review of call volumes and operational frameworks is underway to ensure future standards remain effective. The committee acknowledges upcoming updates regarding triage tools and potential shifts in regulatory definitions for rural and remote areas. Discussion focuses on maintaining current performance metrics while adapting to projected increases in demand over the next decade. The body agrees to proceed with submitting the existing plan pending further analysis of long-term population growth trends.
01:30:56 Speaker 28: The first one is item 7B.
01:31:00 Speaker 28: It's recommended that the 2027 response
01:31:01 Speaker 28: time performance plan, as outlined in
01:31:04 Speaker 28: the report PSRCW0426, be approved and
01:31:07 Speaker 28: submitted to the Ministry of Health.
01:31:09 Speaker 28: May I ask for a mover
01:31:11 Speaker 28: and a second? Move by Councillor
01:31:15 Speaker 28: Nielsen, second by Councillor Eccles. It's
01:31:16 Speaker 28: now on the floor for discussion.
01:31:18 Speaker 28: Welcome. Director McCloud. Good morning, Warden
01:31:19 Speaker 28: County Council. I did bring a
01:31:21 Speaker 28: friend, and I'll introduce Jessica when
01:31:24 Speaker 28: she comes up here. But, anyways,
01:31:26 Speaker 28: knowing that I have three reports,
01:31:28 Speaker 28: so I'll try to keep them
01:31:30 Speaker 28: short. That I might be before
01:31:32 Speaker 28: lunch. So. Okay, so each year
01:31:34 Speaker 28: we have to develop a response
01:31:35 Speaker 28: time plan for the upcoming year,
01:31:38 Speaker 28: and yeah, sorry. Have a response
01:31:41 Speaker 28: time. Oh, okay. Each year we
01:31:42 Speaker 28: have to develop a response time
01:31:45 Speaker 28: performance plan prior to October first,
01:31:46 Speaker 28: and then submit it to the
01:31:49 Speaker 28: ministry prior to the end of
01:31:50 Speaker 28: October. This plan is to cover
01:31:53 Speaker 28: the twenty twenty seven year. To
01:31:55 Speaker 28: cover the 2027 year, and in
01:31:58 Speaker 28: March of next year, we'll report
01:32:00 Speaker 28: on the response times from 2026.
01:32:01 Speaker 28: So this chart it lays out
01:32:03 Speaker 28: our response time plan. It also
01:32:05 Speaker 28: gives you what the 2025 response
01:32:07 Speaker 28: time performance was, and then also
01:32:11 Speaker 28: up till June 2026 or June
01:32:13 Speaker 28: 30th, 2026, and then also our
01:32:15 Speaker 28: our five year average. The response
01:32:17 Speaker 28: times that we have were developed
01:32:19 Speaker 28: back in 2012 when this new
01:32:24 Speaker 28: response time framework was first implemented,
01:32:25 Speaker 28: and the times were took from
01:32:27 Speaker 28: how we were achieving goals at
01:32:29 Speaker 28: that point, we haven't changed the
01:32:31 Speaker 28: response times other than in 2017.
01:32:32 Speaker 28: We improved upon the CTS one
01:32:34 Speaker 28: response time from 50 percent to
01:32:37 Speaker 28: 60 percent, and we also moved
01:32:40 Speaker 28: the CTS three, four, and five
01:32:42 Speaker 28: from 30 minutes down to 20
01:32:44 Speaker 28: minutes. So we've improved upon those
01:32:46 Speaker 28: response times. Sudden cardiac arrest is
01:32:49 Speaker 28: six minutes or less, and we
01:32:51 Speaker 28: as a miss. And we, as
01:32:53 Speaker 28: a municipality, can set the percentage.
01:32:54 Speaker 28: C task one is set at
01:32:55 Speaker 28: eight minutes, and we, as municipality,
01:32:57 Speaker 28: can set the percentage of how
01:32:58 Speaker 28: often we are able to achieve
01:33:00 Speaker 28: that goal. C tasks two, three,
01:33:01 Speaker 28: four, and five, the municipality can
01:33:02 Speaker 28: set the response time as well
01:33:03 Speaker 28: as the percentage. So, if you
01:33:04 Speaker 28: can see our targets, it's forty
01:33:05 Speaker 28: percent of the time for cardiac
01:33:06 Speaker 28: arrest in six minutes or less.
01:33:07 Speaker 28: For C task one, it's eight
01:33:09 Speaker 28: minutes, sixty percent. and then C
01:33:11 Speaker 28: test two is fifteen minutes at
01:33:13 Speaker 28: ninety percent, and then C test
01:33:15 Speaker 28: three, four, and five are all
01:33:17 Speaker 28: at ninety percent for twenty minutes.
01:33:20 Speaker 28: Just to give you an idea
01:33:21 Speaker 28: about also how we look at
01:33:22 Speaker 28: calls, we also look at just
01:33:24 Speaker 28: all call floors together as opposed
01:33:26 Speaker 28: to breaking up by C test,
01:33:27 Speaker 28: and you can see we were
01:33:28 Speaker 28: in that fifteen minute range for
01:33:29 Speaker 28: quite some time, fifteen, thirty-two, and
01:33:31 Speaker 28: in twenty, twenty-five, and. in 2025
01:33:36 Speaker 28: and 1540 this year, and this
01:33:37 Speaker 28: this has been around 15 minutes
01:33:38 Speaker 28: since back almost back to 1996
01:33:41 Speaker 28: when the last response time standard
01:33:44 Speaker 28: was. We measure by 90th percentile
01:33:47 Speaker 28: because that gives us under normal
01:33:51 Speaker 28: usage what time you can expect
01:33:53 Speaker 28: the ambulance to get to the
01:33:56 Speaker 28: scene nine times out of ten
01:33:59 Speaker 28: in the county, and that's from
01:34:00 Speaker 28: the time the pager goes off
01:34:01 Speaker 28: until the time we arrive at
01:34:03 Speaker 28: the scene. So if you look
01:34:04 Speaker 28: at that, if you build in
01:34:06 Speaker 28: a shoot time of when the
01:34:07 Speaker 28: pager goes off in the base,
01:34:08 Speaker 28: it takes you a minute minute
01:34:09 Speaker 28: half to get in the truck
01:34:11 Speaker 28: and. figure out where you're going.
01:34:13 Speaker 28: Nine times out of ten, in
01:34:15 Speaker 28: gray so far this year, we're
01:34:17 Speaker 28: at the scene 15 minutes and
01:34:20 Speaker 28: 40 seconds. Nine times out of
01:34:22 Speaker 28: ten, we also look at average
01:34:25 Speaker 28: response times. Doesn't really tell you
01:34:27 Speaker 28: a lot, like as far as
01:34:29 Speaker 28: like because there's lots of two
01:34:31 Speaker 28: minute response times and maybe 28
01:34:34 Speaker 28: minute response times, but it's just
01:34:35 Speaker 28: a good gauge that we keep
01:34:36 Speaker 28: an eye on average to see
01:34:37 Speaker 28: if that's going up or down,
01:34:43 Speaker 28: and it's typically in this seven
01:34:44 Speaker 28: minute range. So. if approved, this
01:34:47 Speaker 28: will be what will be submitted
01:34:48 Speaker 28: to the ministry this year. Again,
01:34:51 Speaker 28: everything will remain the same, but
01:34:53 Speaker 28: that'll be submitted in, and then
01:34:55 Speaker 28: it'll be published for for people
01:34:58 Speaker 28: to see. Just in regards to
01:35:02 Speaker 28: call volume, this year so far,
01:35:04 Speaker 28: up until June, we've seen a
01:35:06 Speaker 28: three percent increase in call volume.
01:35:08 Speaker 28: If you look at last year,
01:35:13 Speaker 28: we had almost a nine percent
01:35:14 Speaker 28: increase in call volume last year,
01:35:15 Speaker 28: and that's. why it's important not
01:35:17 Speaker 28: to just look one year at
01:35:18 Speaker 28: a time. You have to look
01:35:21 Speaker 28: at over periods of five years
01:35:23 Speaker 28: and ten years to see. And
01:35:27 Speaker 28: if you see below the last
01:35:29 Speaker 28: bullet over the last five years,
01:35:30 Speaker 28: a forty-three percent increase in call
01:35:33 Speaker 28: volume, and the last five years,
01:35:35 Speaker 28: we're looking about averaging about a
01:35:41 Speaker 28: six point six percent per year.
01:35:42 Speaker 28: The OREH study, they're looking predicting
01:35:44 Speaker 28: about five point eight percent over
01:35:49 Speaker 28: the next ten years, beginning in
01:35:51 Speaker 28: twenty twenty three. So it's fairly
01:35:53 Speaker 28: close to what they're predicting, but
01:35:55 Speaker 28: there are times where you see
01:35:57 Speaker 28: a one percent and then you
01:35:59 Speaker 28: see a nine percent, and they
01:36:00 Speaker 28: kind of just average out. So
01:36:02 Speaker 28: we are doing a comprehensive deployment
01:36:04 Speaker 28: review update. This will be a
01:36:07 Speaker 28: check-in. We're just below the midway
01:36:09 Speaker 28: point of the plan, and the
01:36:10 Speaker 28: results of that review will be
01:36:12 Speaker 28: coming out later this year. We're
01:36:15 Speaker 28: looking at call volumes, predicted call
01:36:16 Speaker 28: volumes, response times. asking questions about
01:36:17 Speaker 28: you know looking at population growth
01:36:19 Speaker 28: to see if it's remained the
01:36:22 Speaker 28: same, looking at our bases, the
01:36:24 Speaker 28: the locations, shift patterns, staffing, and
01:36:26 Speaker 28: just kind of comparing it to
01:36:29 Speaker 28: what we have in place right
01:36:31 Speaker 28: now to make sure it's on
01:36:33 Speaker 28: track to be able to meet
01:36:36 Speaker 28: that our our intention of maintaining
01:36:37 Speaker 28: those response times in around that
01:36:40 Speaker 28: fifteen minutes for code four calls.
01:36:44 Speaker 28: So these the respect the results
01:36:48 Speaker 28: of though that. The results of
01:36:50 Speaker 28: the that review will end up
01:36:53 Speaker 15: coming forward later this year in
01:36:54 Speaker 15: 2026 to be able to present
01:36:55 Speaker 15: to receive. Also happening, and Jessica
01:36:57 Speaker 15: will talk about this in a
01:36:59 Speaker 15: minute. There's a new triage tool.
01:37:02 Speaker 15: The current triage tool is kind
01:37:04 Speaker 15: of it's more I'd say outdated
01:37:06 Speaker 15: now. This is a new tool
01:37:08 Speaker 15: that will allow better prioritization of
01:37:10 Speaker 15: calls. And again, I'll let Jessica
01:37:14 Speaker 15: talk. And again, I'll let Cheska
01:37:15 Speaker 15: talk about that. But we look
01:37:16 Speaker 30: forward to that to help again
01:37:19 Speaker 30: with our more immediate threats and
01:37:22 Speaker 30: life-threatening calls. It'll it'll really aid
01:37:24 Speaker 30: with it. Also happening right now
01:37:26 Speaker 30: is we've been talking about this
01:37:28 Speaker 30: for a little over a year
01:37:30 Speaker 30: now. They are relooking at the
01:37:31 Speaker 30: response time standard. In November of
01:37:33 Speaker 30: 25, they took it out of
01:37:36 Speaker 30: the regulation and brought it into
01:37:38 Speaker 30: a standard, and they've kept the
01:37:40 Speaker 30: current framework. But most likely, what
01:37:49 Speaker 30: you'll see is a new framework
01:37:50 Speaker 30: that'll look more at a urban
01:37:52 Speaker 30: rural, and remote framework in response
01:37:55 Speaker 28: to Code Four calls, but that
01:37:57 Speaker 28: has not been finished yet. I
01:37:58 Speaker 28: have seen the the final. I'm
01:38:00 Speaker 28: fortunate to be on the committee,
01:38:01 Speaker 28: so hopefully that moves forward in
01:38:03 Speaker 28: the next year or so. No,
01:38:05 Speaker 28: taking questions. Okay, thank you. So
01:38:06 Speaker 28: we'll focus our questions on the
01:38:07 Speaker 28: response time performance plan. It being
7.c PSR-CW-06-26 MPDS (Medical Priority Dispatch System)
Council members questioned the Medical Priority Dispatch System regarding a 15-minute average response time in rural Ontario, where geography and rising call volumes create pinch points. Officials explained that resources are strategically matched to density using GIS teams to update maps for new developments, though private roads sometimes delay updates. Winter weather conditions like icy roads account for anomalies in the 10% of calls exceeding targets. Hospital offloading challenges increased after 2022 at Owen Sound and Collingwood, leading to ambulances waiting for beds, prompting requests for additional funding for offload duty nurses. The council approved the report on the Medical Priority Dispatch System. Council approved a transition to the Medical Priority Dispatch System that refines existing ambulance dispatch practices using colour-coded priorities instead of simple numbers. The new system allows lower priority calls to be held while higher priority emergencies are dispatched immediately, though paramedics noted this can still cause delays for non-immediate cases. Communication protocols ensure patients remain in contact with the dispatch centre until conditions change or a callback occurs.
01:38:10 Speaker 28: noted that item seven C will
01:38:11 Speaker 28: be a chance for. Item 7C
01:38:14 Speaker 28: will be a chance for us
01:38:17 Speaker 28: to ask more questions, both Director
01:38:19 Speaker 28: McNabb, but also our Deputy Chief
01:38:21 Speaker 28: of Paramedic Services for the Medical
01:38:24 Speaker 28: Priority Dispatch System. So let's save
01:38:25 Speaker 28: any questions on that until we
01:38:26 Speaker 28: get to Item 7C. But with
01:38:29 Speaker 28: regards to the performance plan, any
01:38:30 Speaker 28: questions, Deputy Warden? Thank you, Madam
01:38:32 Speaker 28: Warden, and thank you, Kevin, for
01:38:34 Speaker 28: that report. It's always interesting to
01:38:37 Speaker 28: see the numbers. You indicated that
01:38:38 Speaker 28: the the average response time is
01:38:48 Speaker 28: 15 minutes plus or minus for.
01:38:50 Speaker 28: Fifteen minutes plus or minus for
01:38:51 Speaker 31: thirty some odd years. Where's the
01:38:53 Speaker 31: pinch point on that one, and
01:38:54 Speaker 31: why is that not advancing, getting
01:38:55 Speaker 31: better? Is it just because physically
01:38:57 Speaker 31: we've got not enough people and
01:38:59 Speaker 31: too much geography, or or the
01:39:01 Speaker 31: the trucks don't levitate yet, or
01:39:03 Speaker 31: what? What is the real reason
01:39:04 Speaker 31: why that number just doesn't seem
01:39:06 Speaker 31: to move? Please. In in rural
01:39:07 Speaker 31: Ontario, I think the biggest thing
01:39:09 Speaker 31: that we face is. geography, as
01:39:12 Speaker 31: far as being able to respond,
01:39:14 Speaker 31: and we're talking nine times out
01:39:15 Speaker 31: of ten, or the ninetieth percentile.
01:39:16 Speaker 31: So it really gives you only
01:39:17 Speaker 31: ten percent of the calls that
01:39:19 Speaker 31: could be above above that time.
01:39:20 Speaker 31: And when you look at the
01:39:22 Speaker 31: mapping that we're doing around bases,
01:39:24 Speaker 31: and being able to spread out
01:39:25 Speaker 31: our resources, we're trying to tackle
01:39:26 Speaker 31: those areas to try to improve
01:39:28 Speaker 31: upon them. Recognizing also that those
01:39:30 Speaker 31: areas are lower density, lower call
01:39:34 Speaker 31: volume. So being able to find
01:39:35 Speaker 31: the best way. to match resources
01:39:39 Speaker 31: with density versus area, that's why
01:39:40 Speaker 31: we have to have R H
01:39:42 Speaker 31: to help guide us in that.
01:39:45 Speaker 31: But so I would say so.
01:39:48 Speaker 21: There's a combination here. One is
01:39:49 Speaker 21: the large geography of Gray County,
01:39:51 Speaker 21: and then it's also rising in
01:40:01 Speaker 21: call volumes. But both of those,
01:40:01 Speaker 21: I would say, are the major
01:40:04 Speaker 21: factors. Considering the size of our
01:40:06 Speaker 21: county. and being able to say
01:40:08 Speaker 28: that nine times out of ten
01:40:09 Speaker 28: that we're arriving, you know, in
01:40:12 Speaker 28: the drive time of thirteen and
01:40:14 Speaker 28: a half to fourteen minutes when
01:40:15 Speaker 28: you include shoot time, we're working
01:40:16 Speaker 28: pretty hard. Like we, we, we
01:40:19 Speaker 28: don't leave areas uncovered. You know,
01:40:21 Speaker 28: we move multiple standbys to be
01:40:22 Speaker 28: able to cover those areas off
01:40:23 Speaker 28: to split differences. There's a lot
01:40:25 Speaker 28: of work that goes in the
01:40:27 Speaker 28: background. The call that's just happened,
01:40:29 Speaker 28: you know, we know what resources
01:40:31 Speaker 28: are going, what's needed, but nobody
01:40:32 Speaker 28: really sees the planning that goes
01:40:36 Speaker 28: in the background to say, well,
01:40:38 Speaker 28: what happens with the next call.
01:40:39 Speaker 28: To say, well, what happens when
01:40:42 Speaker 28: the next call happens? We're trying
01:40:44 Speaker 28: to put resources in place for
01:40:46 Speaker 28: the call that hasn't happened yet.
01:40:47 Speaker 28: So it's not just about responding
01:40:48 Speaker 28: to the call; it's about thinking
01:40:52 Speaker 28: about where the next call is
01:40:54 Speaker 28: going to be and try to
01:40:56 Speaker 28: minimizing that next response in case
01:40:58 Speaker 28: something happens, and it's hard to
01:40:59 Speaker 28: predict. Okay, thank you. We'll go
01:41:01 Speaker 28: to Councillor Kivney. Thank you, Madam
01:41:04 Speaker 28: Warden, and Director McNab. May I
01:41:05 Speaker 28: ask you how much of a
01:41:07 Speaker 28: challenge is Google mapping in terms
01:41:07 Speaker 28: of new addressing, new? civic addressing,
01:41:09 Speaker 28: getting uploaded into Google Maps, and
01:41:11 Speaker 28: and is that creating any issue
01:41:12 Speaker 28: for you in finding those new
01:41:13 Speaker 28: addresses? I would say that we
01:41:15 Speaker 28: have a fairly extensive GIS team.
01:41:17 Speaker 28: That so when there are new
01:41:18 Speaker 28: streets, they're in constant contact with
01:41:20 Speaker 28: our dispatch centre and be able
01:41:22 Speaker 28: to update those maps. I think
01:41:23 Speaker 28: sometimes we end up in new
01:41:25 Speaker 28: developments where it may be a
01:41:27 Speaker 28: private road or a private area
01:41:29 Speaker 28: that doesn't get updated, sometimes those
01:41:34 Speaker 28: take longer, and we sometimes end
01:41:38 Speaker 28: up when we see a look
01:41:43 Speaker 28: at a response time, we see
01:41:48 Speaker 15: that that wasn't indicated. So we
01:41:49 Speaker 15: do have mechanisms to trigger when
01:41:53 Speaker 15: our response times aren't met. We
01:41:55 Speaker 15: look at the reasons why, and
01:41:57 Speaker 15: sometimes that's able to trigger that
01:41:59 Speaker 14: there's a mapping update required. But
01:42:02 Speaker 14: our dispatch generally has, I would
01:42:05 Speaker 14: say, almost always the most up
01:42:07 Speaker 14: to date map in the vehicles.
01:42:09 Speaker 14: The the CAC, the dispatch. centre
01:42:12 Speaker 14: they send the location with the
01:42:14 Speaker 14: coordinates to the to the vehicle
01:42:15 Speaker 14: which has been an update that's
01:42:18 Speaker 14: been in place now, obviously since
01:42:19 Speaker 14: 2021 like having the the map
01:42:22 Speaker 14: already displayed in the truck and
01:42:24 Speaker 14: we use ways for it so
01:42:25 Speaker 14: we're able to bring in road
01:42:28 Speaker 14: closures and stuff like that, which
01:42:30 Speaker 14: has significantly helped the response. There's
01:42:32 Speaker 14: some addresses if you're not like
01:42:38 Speaker 14: if we have a paramedic working
01:42:40 Speaker 14: in Gray they could have grew
01:42:42 Speaker 31: up in Graylee and they have
01:42:43 Speaker 31: to work in Hanover, having that
01:42:45 Speaker 31: ability you know to get in
01:42:49 Speaker 31: the truck and to know where
01:42:50 Speaker 31: you're going, really helps. So we
01:42:51 Speaker 31: tried it with that, but but
01:42:54 Speaker 31: yeah, I would say you know
01:42:56 Speaker 31: there's lots of work in the
01:42:57 Speaker 31: background to ensure that the GIS
01:43:00 Speaker 31: information is up to date at
01:43:01 Speaker 31: dispatch, and they're they're always overlaying
01:43:02 Speaker 31: those new roads into the the
01:43:04 Speaker 31: CAD. I'm not saying it's perfect,
01:43:04 Speaker 31: but they they do work hard
01:43:06 Speaker 31: to make sure nothing's missed. Okay.
01:43:13 Speaker 31: Anything else, Councillor McCabe? Sorry, Mackie.
01:43:19 Speaker 31: ah, ah, you get my dessert
01:43:22 Speaker 31: at lunch. Well, Warden, I can
01:43:26 Speaker 31: say that you're not the first
01:43:27 Speaker 32: person that's made that mistake. Thank
01:43:30 Speaker 32: you, Kevin. Thank you very much
01:43:35 Speaker 32: for the report. And I'm, you
01:43:37 Speaker 32: know, I'm impressed with our response
01:43:39 Speaker 32: times. I had the the opportunity
01:43:45 Speaker 32: to witness the response times to
01:43:47 Speaker 32: my mother's house a couple days
01:43:48 Speaker 31: ago, and I was very impressed.
01:43:50 Speaker 31: She is quite rurally located, and
01:43:52 Speaker 31: the length of time was it
01:43:54 Speaker 31: was less than what I anticipated.
01:43:56 Speaker 31: The ambulance arriving so, and the
01:43:58 Speaker 31: crew did a wonderful job looking
01:44:01 Speaker 31: after. My question is in response
01:44:03 Speaker 31: in regards to the response times.
01:44:04 Speaker 31: How does our winter weather factor
01:44:05 Speaker 31: into the? Do we have any
01:44:08 Speaker 31: idea what our inclement winter weather
01:44:10 Speaker 31: does to our response times? Thank
01:44:11 Speaker 31: you. Yeah, generally winter will play
01:44:13 Speaker 31: a role in this, whether it's
01:44:14 Speaker 31: icy roads or can't see and
01:44:15 Speaker 31: stuff like that. Again, that falls
01:44:16 Speaker 31: into that 10% range of anomalies.
01:44:19 Speaker 31: Like I don't can't like say
01:44:21 Speaker 31: off the top of my head
01:44:23 Speaker 31: like what what the time difference
01:44:26 Speaker 31: is, but you see it that
01:44:28 Speaker 31: when we look at response times
01:44:30 Speaker 31: where we didn't meet the target,
01:44:32 Speaker 31: that the weather is related. Like
01:44:34 Speaker 31: we ask the crew when the
01:44:34 Speaker 31: call closes, why did it take
01:44:38 Speaker 31: you this long to get to
01:44:40 Speaker 31: the call, and then usually it's.
01:44:42 Speaker 31: And usually, it's generally the two
01:44:44 Speaker 31: most common are distance and weather.
01:44:45 Speaker 31: Okay, thank you, Councillor McKay. Thank
01:44:48 Speaker 31: you, Alderman. Through you, Kevin, do
01:44:50 Speaker 31: you keep stats on AED calls,
01:44:52 Speaker 31: private, like the ones that are
01:44:56 Speaker 31: in the public hands, and that
01:44:56 Speaker 31: how many times they're used and
01:45:01 Speaker 31: are they worthwhile? Having these ones
01:45:02 Speaker 15: in certain places, I guess arenas,
01:45:06 Speaker 15: yes. But thanks. One of the
01:45:08 Speaker 15: issues with the response time framework,
01:45:14 Speaker 15: and we've talked about data a
01:45:16 Speaker 15: fair bit, is actually using that
01:45:18 Speaker 33: data towards ours and getting that
01:45:21 Speaker 33: those times back. Like typically, it's
01:45:22 Speaker 33: based only when the ambulance arrives.
01:45:24 Speaker 33: But our AEDs necessary? Yeah, they
01:45:27 Speaker 33: are. Well, if you have one
01:45:29 Speaker 33: AED work once that you. If
01:45:30 Speaker 33: you have one AED, work once
01:45:32 Speaker 33: a year. It depends who it's
01:45:33 Speaker 33: for, I guess, but I would
01:45:40 Speaker 33: say it's worth it no matter
01:45:42 Speaker 33: what. I hope someday that AEDs
01:45:43 Speaker 31: are in every home. That's where
01:45:46 Speaker 31: it needs to be. Most cardiac
01:45:49 Speaker 31: arrests happen in the home. That's
01:45:51 Speaker 31: probably where they need to get
01:45:53 Speaker 31: to. Right now, it's the men
01:45:54 Speaker 31: need to be on job sites,
01:45:56 Speaker 31: but you know, we—I'd say we
01:45:57 Speaker 31: have a fairly strong programme here
01:46:00 Speaker 31: in Gray. That part of the
01:46:01 Speaker 31: paramedic services budget is to maintain
01:46:03 Speaker 31: over the 200 that we have.
01:46:05 Speaker 31: We ensure that there's batteries and.
01:46:07 Speaker 31: pads, and that they're doing their
01:46:09 Speaker 31: checks, that they're ready to go
01:46:10 Speaker 31: when they're needed. But, but I,
01:46:12 Speaker 31: I really hope a day comes
01:46:14 Speaker 31: that we expand a DFB, maybe
01:46:17 Speaker 31: gets to be three hundred dollars
01:46:19 Speaker 31: or five hundred dollars, that people
01:46:21 Speaker 31: can afford them in their homes.
01:46:23 Speaker 31: And, but, yeah, we we do
01:46:24 Speaker 31: use public access DFBs. We've had
01:46:27 Speaker 31: them in arenas. We've used them
01:46:28 Speaker 31: in different places. Yet, I would
01:46:30 Speaker 31: say it's worthwhile to keep going
01:46:34 Speaker 31: with. Okay. Thank you. We'll go
01:46:36 Speaker 31: to Councillor Greg and then to
01:46:38 Speaker 31: alternate Councillor Kepke. Thank you, Kevin.
01:46:39 Speaker 31: My question is: How do hospital
01:46:41 Speaker 31: offloading requirements impact your your response
01:46:44 Speaker 31: times? And certainly, it was a
01:47:00 Speaker 31: significant challenge going back a few
01:47:01 Speaker 31: years. You're having your resources—I don't
01:47:03 Speaker 31: want to say tied up, but
01:47:04 Speaker 31: being required for prolonged periods of
01:47:11 Speaker 31: time at hospitals offloading. How are
01:47:14 Speaker 31: we comparing now? to the the
01:47:17 Speaker 31: challenges of a few years ago,
01:47:20 Speaker 20: and and what are the impacts
01:47:23 Speaker 20: of that still on on the
01:47:25 Speaker 20: plan that you're putting forward? Yeah,
01:47:27 Speaker 20: prior probably to 2022, I would
01:47:36 Speaker 20: say we really didn't have an
01:47:37 Speaker 20: offload problem, but in 2022 we
01:47:39 Speaker 20: have seen increases, particularly in Owen
01:47:40 Speaker 20: Sound and in Collingwood in the
01:47:42 Speaker 31: wintertime. I can't say enough about
01:47:44 Speaker 31: Bright Shores of how they've tried
01:47:45 Speaker 31: to do things to help. We
01:47:47 Speaker 31: have the fit to sit programme.
01:47:49 Speaker 31: now. We have extra offload stretchers.
01:47:51 Speaker 31: We have an offload duty nurse,
01:47:52 Speaker 31: which we've asked for more funding
01:47:54 Speaker 31: to be able to have a
01:47:55 Speaker 31: nurse available. We haven't received that
01:47:56 Speaker 31: yet. They only probably gave us
01:48:01 Speaker 31: a quarter of what we need
01:48:03 Speaker 31: for that programme that to support
01:48:05 Speaker 31: the hospital. We hope that that'll
01:48:08 Speaker 31: increase this year, but it does
01:48:10 Speaker 15: create issues. Like you know, in
01:48:11 Speaker 15: Sandwich, is our busiest centre. On
01:48:13 Speaker 15: busy days, it can be not
01:48:16 Speaker 15: uncommon to have four or five
01:48:19 Speaker 15: ambulances sitting and waiting. Of ailments
01:48:20 Speaker 15: is sitting and waiting for a
01:48:22 Speaker 15: bed, and so then that's the
01:48:24 Speaker 15: communication between supervisor and the nurse
01:48:26 Speaker 15: and crews. Sometimes we double up
01:48:27 Speaker 15: patients, stuff like that. But no,
01:48:30 Speaker 15: it can be challenging at times,
01:48:32 Speaker 15: and always seems to happen when
01:48:34 Speaker 15: you're the busiest too. Like typically,
01:48:41 Speaker 15: it's flu season, merges busy, most
01:48:42 Speaker 15: likely because we were busy. Okay,
01:48:45 Speaker 15: alternate. Part of the ORH review
01:48:47 Speaker 28: will be to to be looking
01:48:48 Speaker 28: at that again, and they will
01:48:51 Speaker 28: be able to comment on it.
01:48:53 Speaker 28: Thank you. Through you, Warden, to
01:48:54 Speaker 28: Kevin. My question is more regarding
01:48:54 Speaker 28: communication, and I wondered when a
01:48:57 Speaker 28: call comes in, and it's answered
01:48:58 Speaker 28: by. whatever services are required to
01:49:00 Speaker 28: go there, is it communicated to
01:49:08 Speaker 28: the incident how long approximately resources
01:49:13 Speaker 28: may be coming? That's one thing
01:49:14 Speaker 28: our dispatch centre will not do.
01:49:16 Speaker 28: I don't believe that they will
01:49:19 Speaker 28: say that time. They will reassure
01:49:20 Speaker 28: them that they've been dispatched and
01:49:24 Speaker 28: on their way, but I don't
01:49:26 Speaker 28: believe that they actually give a
01:49:28 Speaker 28: time because that could change. If
01:49:30 Speaker 28: they're going to be delayed, they
01:49:33 Speaker 28: will call back. you know, within
01:49:35 Speaker 28: I think I believe it's thirty
01:49:36 Speaker 28: minutes to do a check-in, but
01:49:37 Speaker 28: they do not say they're going
01:49:39 Speaker 28: to be six or seven minutes
01:49:41 Speaker 28: or whatever that time is. Okay,
01:49:44 Speaker 28: any further questions on this one?
01:49:45 Speaker 28: All right, not seeing any further
01:49:47 Speaker 28: hands. All those in favour? Okay,
01:49:49 Speaker 28: that motion is carried. Thank you.
01:49:52 Speaker 34: So we will now move on
01:49:53 Speaker 34: to item seven C. It's recommended
01:49:55 Speaker 34: that report PSRCW zero six twenty
01:49:57 Speaker 34: six regarding the medical priority dispatch.
01:49:59 Speaker 34: System: The receipt for information. They
01:50:05 Speaker 34: ask for a mover and a
01:50:06 Speaker 34: seconder. Got it moved by Councillor
01:50:09 Speaker 34: Pringle, seconded by Councillor Patterson. It's
01:50:11 Speaker 34: on the floor for discussion. So,
01:50:13 Speaker 34: Director McNab, I understand you are
01:50:16 Speaker 34: going to be introducing Deputy Chief
01:50:17 Speaker 34: Rob for this one as well.
01:50:19 Speaker 34: Yes, thank you, Warden and Council.
01:50:22 Speaker 34: Yes, my pleasure to introduce Jessica
01:50:24 Speaker 34: Rob, who is our Deputy Chief
01:50:26 Speaker 34: of Operations, and she's done the.
01:50:30 Speaker 34: majority of the work on this
01:50:32 Speaker 34: implementation. It's in quite a process
01:50:34 Speaker 34: to get to where it is
01:50:35 Speaker 34: today. There's a lot of work
01:50:37 Speaker 34: that goes in the background to
01:50:39 Speaker 34: implement this, and so who who
01:50:41 Speaker 34: best to tell you about it
01:50:44 Speaker 34: than her? So, here we. Good
01:50:46 Speaker 34: morning, Marden, everyone, counselors. Thank you
01:50:48 Speaker 34: for having me. So it is
01:50:52 Speaker 34: the recommendation of our department that
01:50:54 Speaker 34: we present this report for. your
01:50:56 Speaker 34: information and understanding of how the
01:50:58 Speaker 34: implementation of this new system will
01:51:00 Speaker 34: impact the community. On October 14th
01:51:02 Speaker 34: of this year, our CAC London
01:51:04 Speaker 34: Dispatch Centre is going to be
01:51:05 Speaker 34: changing to a new dispatch system
01:51:07 Speaker 34: known as the Medical Priority Dispatch
01:51:09 Speaker 34: System, or MPDS, is what we
01:51:13 Speaker 34: call it. So this new system
01:51:15 Speaker 34: is being implemented by the Ministry
01:51:17 Speaker 34: of Health. They're rolling it out
01:51:21 Speaker 34: province-wide, and about half of the
01:51:23 Speaker 34: province has transitioned so far to
01:51:25 Speaker 34: date. it's going to be replacing
01:51:27 Speaker 34: our current system, which we call
01:51:29 Speaker 34: DPci. It's been in place
01:51:31 Speaker 34: since the early nineties, and the
01:51:33 Speaker 34: goal of this new system is
01:51:40 Speaker 34: to optimize the resources across the
01:51:42 Speaker 34: county and get our paramedics to
01:51:45 Speaker 34: the sickest and most at-risk patients
01:51:47 Speaker 34: first. This chart represents a comparison
01:51:50 Speaker 34: of the old model versus the
01:51:52 Speaker 34: new model. Under DPci, you'll see
01:51:54 Speaker 34: code four and code three were
01:51:56 Speaker 34: the only level of priority calls.
01:51:58 Speaker 34: for the community, so
01:52:01 Speaker 34: these two categories would be
01:52:03 Speaker 34: all inclusive of any medical emergency
01:52:07 Speaker 34: coming in through the 911 system,
01:52:09 Speaker 34: whereas the MPDS has divided it
01:52:12 Speaker 34: down into five different priority levels.
01:52:14 Speaker 34: So under the current DPci, a
01:52:20 Speaker 34: person experiencing vomiting or a laceration,
01:52:21 Speaker 34: a heart attack or a cardiac
01:52:23 Speaker 34: arrest, could all be assigned as
01:52:24 Speaker 34: a code four response. These calls
01:52:27 Speaker 34: would be entered into the queue
01:52:28 Speaker 34: as they're received, and then dispatched
01:52:31 Speaker 34: on a first come. first serve
01:52:34 Speaker 34: basis. Under the new MPDS, dispatchers
01:52:35 Speaker 34: are going to be able to
01:52:38 Speaker 34: better prioritize medical conditions and divert
01:52:41 Speaker 34: ambulances to areas when an immediate
01:52:44 Speaker 34: life threat is identified. So, if
01:52:47 Speaker 34: there is a unit that is
01:52:50 Speaker 34: assigned on a priority basis for
01:52:52 Speaker 34: a patient with a laceration, and
01:52:54 Speaker 34: if they've been identified as the
01:52:58 Speaker 34: closest unit to a cardiac arrest
01:53:00 Speaker 34: that comes in, they will be
01:53:04 Speaker 34: diverted to the patient who has
01:53:06 Speaker 34: the greater need for timely care.
01:53:09 Speaker 34: So, in addition to being able
01:53:14 Speaker 34: to improve the triaging of medical
01:53:15 Speaker 34: emergencies, some key changes include best
01:53:18 Speaker 34: unit assignments, low priority thresholds, and
01:53:20 Speaker 34: region critical counts. All of which
01:53:22 Speaker 34: will help us improve our emergency
01:53:24 Speaker 34: coverage across the county. It also
01:53:26 Speaker 34: gives us an opportunity to better
01:53:28 Speaker 34: prioritize interfacility transfers to balance our
01:53:30 Speaker 34: community needs with the hospital needs.
01:53:33 Speaker 34: MPDS is clinically validated as safe
01:53:35 Speaker 34: and reliable way to triage medical
01:53:37 Speaker 34: conditions, and there's quality assurance programmemes
01:53:41 Speaker 34: in place, including a dispatch review
01:53:46 Speaker 34: committee in each jurisdiction, and they
01:53:49 Speaker 34: continuously review calls as they come
01:53:50 Speaker 02: in and the impacts of the
01:53:51 Speaker 02: wait times. Communities are going to
01:53:53 Speaker 02: see improved prioritization of life-threatening emergencies,
01:53:55 Speaker 02: more efficient operations, more sustainable programmeings.
01:53:56 Speaker 02: There may be community members. with
01:54:01 Speaker 02: lower needs who experience delays for
01:54:02 Speaker 02: service, and healthcare facilities will see
01:54:07 Speaker 02: changes in how transfers are prioritized.
01:54:08 Speaker 02: So, to make sure that we
01:54:10 Speaker 02: are prepared, we've taken a number
01:54:13 Speaker 02: of steps. We've met with all
01:54:16 Speaker 02: of the fire chiefs in the
01:54:19 Speaker 02: county, and we've all been able
01:54:21 Speaker 02: to agree that the translation of
01:54:23 Speaker 09: responses from the current DPCI to
01:54:26 Speaker 09: MPDS will maintain the same level
01:54:29 Speaker 09: of response that the. community is
01:54:31 Speaker 09: receiving now. Our deployment utilization strategy
01:54:32 Speaker 09: has been updated to account for
01:54:35 Speaker 09: resource allocation, wait times, and thresholds.
01:54:36 Speaker 09: Staff education has been built in
01:54:38 Speaker 09: short online digestible modules for staff
01:54:40 Speaker 09: to complete at their ability. We
01:54:45 Speaker 09: have staff who are sitting on
01:54:47 Speaker 09: regional change management and dispatch review
01:54:49 Speaker 09: committees that will continue throughout the
01:54:51 Speaker 09: transition and afterwards, and we have.
01:54:53 Speaker 09: ongoing engagement sessions with our hospitals,
01:55:00 Speaker 09: long-term care, fire, and police departments.
01:55:04 Speaker 09: So dispatch operations are governed by
01:55:08 Speaker 09: the Ministry of Health, and they
01:55:10 Speaker 09: develop this patient journey, which outlines
01:55:12 Speaker 09: how emergency calls are received and
01:55:14 Speaker 09: how they're prioritized in the queue.
01:55:15 Speaker 09: And then we take that information
01:55:17 Speaker 21: and create a plan for the
01:55:19 Speaker 21: deployment to the emergency calls, based
01:55:21 Speaker 21: on our local resources and capacity.
01:55:23 Speaker 21: No changes. to funding, staffing, or
01:55:25 Speaker 21: resources is anticipated to facilitate this
01:55:28 Speaker 21: change, and we're confident we're prepared
01:55:30 Speaker 21: for a seamless transition. Thank you.
01:55:35 Speaker 21: Thank you very much for those
01:55:39 Speaker 21: details and the explanation about what
01:55:42 Speaker 21: it means differently and how you've
01:55:44 Speaker 34: been able to parse it now
01:55:46 Speaker 34: into the colour coding instead of
01:55:47 Speaker 34: grouped together. It sounds like it
01:55:48 Speaker 34: must be a very exciting transition
01:55:50 Speaker 34: for you. Yeah, absolutely. All right.
01:55:53 Speaker 34: So with that, any questions, Deputy
01:55:54 Speaker 34: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and
01:55:56 Speaker 34: thank you, Jessica, for the report
01:55:58 Speaker 34: for the discussion there. When an
01:55:59 Speaker 34: airplane's taking off, there's a certain
01:56:00 Speaker 34: point of no return. They must
01:56:03 Speaker 34: continue to. What would be the
01:56:07 Speaker 34: point of no return for an
01:56:09 Speaker 34: ambulance responding to an incident of
01:56:11 Speaker 34: low acuity, before they would not
01:56:16 Speaker 34: be diverted? Like, would it be
01:56:17 Speaker 34: literally? they turn in the gate?
01:56:18 Speaker 34: No,pe we're not going there. We're
01:56:20 Speaker 34: going further. Or is is there
01:56:23 Speaker 34: a point of no return where
01:56:24 Speaker 34: they would respond to a certain
01:56:26 Speaker 34: call before they would be diverted?
01:56:27 Speaker 34: Please. Yeah, it would be my
01:56:29 Speaker 34: understanding that that would be at
01:56:31 Speaker 34: the time of patient contact. So,
01:56:33 Speaker 34: should a higher acuity call come
01:56:36 Speaker 34: in, if that ambulance hasn't made
01:56:39 Speaker 34: patient contact, they could be diverted.
01:56:43 Speaker 34: Okay. Thank you. Great question. Oh,
01:56:50 Speaker 34: Councillor Heaney. Thank you, Madam Warden,
01:56:53 Speaker 34: and Jessica. I'm just wondering, in
01:56:57 Speaker 34: relation to your conversations with our
01:57:01 Speaker 13: fire departments as municipalities, should we
01:57:04 Speaker 13: be concerned that there may be
01:57:06 Speaker 13: a greater number of medical calls
01:57:11 Speaker 13: coming to our fire departments? Are
01:57:15 Speaker 13: we prepared for that? Just thinking
01:57:18 Speaker 13: as you're talking about the transition
01:57:23 Speaker 13: period and the possible diversion of
01:57:28 Speaker 13: certain calls. I'm just asking: Should
01:57:31 Speaker 13: our our departments be prepared for
01:57:36 Speaker 13: a greater number of calls? Thank
01:57:38 Speaker 13: you. I I can't predict what's
01:57:40 Speaker 13: going to happen, but I don't
01:57:43 Speaker 13: I don't believe so. I think
01:57:45 Speaker 13: actually it's we're gonna this progress
01:57:49 Speaker 13: is going to make us make
01:57:50 Speaker 13: sure that we have the right
01:57:54 Speaker 13: resources going at the right times
01:57:57 Speaker 13: instead of having system overwhelm. And
01:58:00 Speaker 13: we were we were very clear
01:58:04 Speaker 13: when we sat. The fire chiefs
01:58:06 Speaker 13: were very receptive to working as
01:58:11 Speaker 13: a team, and we talked through
01:58:14 Speaker 13: a lot of the points. And
01:58:15 Speaker 13: we talked about things like MBCs,
01:58:17 Speaker 13: where a low priority MBC or
01:58:19 Speaker 13: motor vehicle collision might experience a
01:58:21 Speaker 13: delay in paramedics arriving because it's
01:58:24 Speaker 13: triaged as a green, but they
01:58:25 Speaker 15: would still be dispatched to it.
01:58:27 Speaker 15: But we talked about how that
01:58:29 Speaker 15: would be important because they have
01:58:32 Speaker 15: other roles to play when it
01:58:35 Speaker 15: comes to scene safety. and protecting
01:58:38 Speaker 15: of the scene and things, they
01:58:41 Speaker 15: have a lot of other things
01:58:43 Speaker 15: that they provide, not necessarily based
01:58:44 Speaker 15: on patient contact. So the way
01:58:46 Speaker 15: that a patient is triaged doesn't
01:58:48 Speaker 15: necessarily relate to our need for
01:58:50 Speaker 15: allied agencies on scene. Is that
01:58:52 Speaker 15: fair? Okay, thank you. We'll go
01:58:54 Speaker 15: to Councillor Dober. Thank you, Warden
01:58:55 Speaker 15: and Jessica. Just. to the deputy
01:58:57 Speaker 15: warden's question and your answer, I
01:58:59 Speaker 15: can't imagine seeing an ambulance pulling
01:59:01 Speaker 15: up my lane way and then
01:59:05 Speaker 15: having them diverted because they haven't
01:59:07 Speaker 15: actually made patient contact. I wondered
01:59:08 Speaker 15: at some point we have other
01:59:10 Speaker 15: buses, you know, covering the area
01:59:11 Speaker 34: or doing things, but. is it
01:59:14 Speaker 34: communicated to the caller their level
01:59:15 Speaker 34: of priority when the call comes
01:59:17 Speaker 34: in? I, in this instance, you
01:59:18 Speaker 34: know, you see the the ambulance
01:59:20 Speaker 34: coming down your farm lane way
01:59:21 Speaker 34: and then backing out and leaving.
01:59:23 Speaker 34: Um, it just I can't imagine
01:59:24 Speaker 34: the feeling of the patient wondering,
01:59:28 Speaker 34: you know. I'm going to bleed
01:59:30 Speaker 34: to death, or could you just
01:59:31 Speaker 34: please assure us that there's other
01:59:33 Speaker 34: methods in place that diversion would
01:59:36 Speaker 34: be a last resort, or the
01:59:37 Speaker 34: communication to the caller or patient
01:59:40 Speaker 34: they understand that they're not a
01:59:42 Speaker 34: priority. How does that work? Okay,
01:59:44 Speaker 34: just before you speak, I do
01:59:46 Speaker 34: see Director McNab is also lining
01:59:49 Speaker 34: up to be able to. facilitate
01:59:51 Speaker 34: in both of you responding, keeping
01:59:55 Speaker 34: in mind too that that what
01:59:56 Speaker 34: you're describing to us is a
01:59:58 Speaker 34: practice that's already in place. It's
02:00:00 Speaker 34: just using the old system right
02:00:03 Speaker 34: now. So I'm hearing, if we
02:00:05 Speaker 28: understand correctly, from Director Mc Dow's
02:00:08 Speaker 28: first response, the deputy warden, or
02:00:10 Speaker 28: sorry, to the the deputy chief,
02:00:11 Speaker 28: that this has always been in
02:00:14 Speaker 28: play. There's always been that question
02:00:17 Speaker 28: of when is the point of
02:00:18 Speaker 28: no return on the old
02:00:21 Speaker 28: numbered system. Now it's just further
02:00:23 Speaker 28: refined into the colour system. So
02:00:25 Speaker 28: I guess that question may arise
02:00:27 Speaker 28: more frequently than it might have
02:00:29 Speaker 28: when it was just a simple
02:00:31 Speaker 28: one, two, three. So with that,
02:00:32 Speaker 28: I invite the deputy chief to
02:00:35 Speaker 28: respond and and lean into Director
02:00:37 Speaker 28: Munab if you prefer. Thank you.
02:00:38 Speaker 28: I can say that it is
02:00:39 Speaker 28: like it is a current practice.
02:00:40 Speaker 28: As you saw in the chart,
02:00:42 Speaker 28: there is a code three and
02:00:44 Speaker 28: code four priority currently. So if
02:00:47 Speaker 28: an ambulance was dispatched on a
02:00:48 Speaker 28: code three or a low priority
02:00:50 Speaker 28: call, and a code four or
02:00:52 Speaker 28: a higher priority call came in,
02:00:53 Speaker 28: they would be redirected to that
02:00:57 Speaker 28: if they were the closest unit.
02:00:58 Speaker 28: So it is an ongoing practice.
02:01:01 Speaker 28: Prior to paramedics arriving on scene,
02:01:02 Speaker 28: the patient would be in kind
02:01:05 Speaker 28: of the care and control of
02:01:07 Speaker 28: the dispatch centre and be maintaining
02:01:09 Speaker 28: communications with them. I don't think
02:01:11 Speaker 28: I could fairly speak to their
02:01:12 Speaker 28: policies, but as Director McNaught mentioned,
02:01:15 Speaker 28: they do have regular point contacts.
02:01:16 Speaker 28: where they call back and make
02:01:19 Speaker 28: contact with the patient based on
02:01:21 Speaker 28: their acuity. I would invite Kevin
02:01:22 Speaker 28: to answer anything further that I
02:01:24 Speaker 28: might be missing. Patients are always
02:01:25 Speaker 28: advised if the condition changes to
02:01:26 Speaker 28: call back, and there also is
02:01:29 Speaker 28: check-ins. I believe it's thirty minutes.
02:01:31 Speaker 28: Just recognizing here, like the likelihood
02:01:33 Speaker 28: of that happening is small, but
02:01:35 Speaker 28: but the thing is now even
02:01:39 Speaker 28: better with this new priority tool.
02:01:41 Speaker 28: If we're pulling somebody off for
02:01:42 Speaker 28: a cardiac arrest from somebody now
02:01:45 Speaker 28: that is an imminently dying, it's
02:01:47 Speaker 28: to help that other person. These
02:01:49 Speaker 28: are difficult discussions and conversations, but
02:01:51 Speaker 28: it's with the best intent to
02:01:53 Speaker 28: do the most for the most
02:01:56 Speaker 28: critical. So I I feel for
02:01:58 Speaker 28: what you're saying, like it's not
02:02:00 Speaker 28: great, and is most likely we
02:02:01 Speaker 28: get an inquiry about why the
02:02:03 Speaker 28: ambulance left, and potentially the patient
02:02:05 Speaker 28: family could call and say, I
02:02:07 Speaker 28: think the ambulance got, they think
02:02:09 Speaker 28: they might have the wrong address,
02:02:10 Speaker 28: you know, stuff. like that. But
02:02:12 Speaker 28: those type of conversations would take
02:02:13 Speaker 28: place if they call back. I
02:02:14 Speaker 28: I know because we talked about
02:02:15 Speaker 28: this before in the past about
02:02:17 Speaker 28: outside of the thirty minutes, like
02:02:19 Speaker 28: they don't give times, and I
02:02:27 Speaker 28: can see some reasons for that.
02:02:30 Speaker 28: But I'm not sure. Like when
02:02:32 Speaker 28: I look at our like when
02:02:35 Speaker 13: we measure code four times, we
02:02:39 Speaker 13: measure from the time the pager
02:02:42 Speaker 13: goes off till the time we
02:02:45 Speaker 13: arrive, because code four life and
02:02:48 Speaker 13: death call. Because code four life
02:02:51 Speaker 13: and death calls can't be held,
02:02:54 Speaker 13: like they just they have to
02:02:57 Speaker 13: be dispatched right out. Code three
02:03:00 Speaker 13: calls are now when you look
02:03:02 Speaker 13: at your yellow, your green, yellow
02:03:09 Speaker 13: and orange, they can be held,
02:03:10 Speaker 13: and that we call that a
02:03:11 Speaker 13: T one time, not a T
02:03:14 Speaker 15: two time. When we look at
02:03:15 Speaker 15: our, if we look at it
02:03:18 Speaker 15: today, like our T one time,
02:03:21 Speaker 15: the time of the call received,
02:03:23 Speaker 15: the cact, the time we arrive
02:03:25 Speaker 15: for code threes, again back to
02:03:27 Speaker 15: these green, yellow and orange, in
02:03:32 Speaker 15: twenty. In 2026, it's 25 minutes.
02:03:35 Speaker 15: So these are lower priority emergency
02:03:36 Speaker 15: calls. Nine times out of ten,
02:03:38 Speaker 15: even including the hold time, is
02:03:40 Speaker 15: still pretty good. Out of nine
02:03:42 Speaker 15: times out of ten. But it
02:03:44 Speaker 15: can't happen, yeah. But hopefully, you
02:03:48 Speaker 15: know, I look. There's nothing more
02:03:50 Speaker 15: frustrating as a paramedic that you
02:03:51 Speaker 15: know that somebody they may be
02:03:53 Speaker 15: vomiting and short of breath. Today
02:03:55 Speaker 28: it's a code four, and then
02:03:57 Speaker 28: a cardiac arrest happens around the
02:03:59 Speaker 28: corner. We can't be taken off
02:04:01 Speaker 28: that call. I feel for the
02:04:02 Speaker 28: person that's short of breath and
02:04:05 Speaker 28: vomiting, but that's not an immediate
02:04:07 Speaker 28: threat. And now I have to
02:04:09 Speaker 28: wait for an ambulance to go
02:04:11 Speaker 28: to the cardiac arrest that's ten
02:04:13 Speaker 28: minutes away, where I could just
02:04:15 Speaker 28: go, and we we can't do
02:04:17 Speaker 28: that today. Tomorrow, tomorrow we can,
02:04:21 Speaker 28: or October we can. Follow up,
02:04:23 Speaker 28: and thank you. Totally understand. Just
02:04:25 Speaker 28: when it's said out loud and
02:04:26 Speaker 28: being recorded, it's it's often. misinterpreted
02:04:29 Speaker 28: and and the perception they they
02:04:31 Speaker 28: don't always have that information and
02:04:32 Speaker 28: I appreciate the deputy chief's comments
02:04:34 Speaker 28: about and yours about callbacks. There's
02:04:36 Speaker 28: they're in touch with the patient,
02:04:38 Speaker 28: they're monitoring their their situation. So
02:04:39 Speaker 28: the communication piece is so critical.
02:04:40 Speaker 28: And looking forward to this helping
02:04:43 Speaker 28: you deliver the service that you
02:04:44 Speaker 28: so want to do. We so
02:04:46 Speaker 28: want to do. Okay, thank you.
02:04:47 Speaker 28: Anything further? All right. Not seeing
02:04:48 Speaker 28: any further hands. I'll call the
02:04:50 Speaker 28: question. All those in favour? And
02:04:54 Speaker 28: that motion is carried. Thank you
02:04:56 Speaker 28: very much, Deputy Chief. We appreciate
02:04:58 Speaker 28: your introduction to that transition system.
02:05:00 Speaker 28: But the Director McNabb will hold
02:05:02 Speaker 28: on to you for one more
02:05:05 Speaker 28: for item seven D. It's recommended
7.d PSR-CW-05-26 2025 Ministry of Health Service Review Results
The Council received a report detailing the results of a triennial service review conducted by the provincial regulatory branch. The evaluation confirmed that the organisation met all operational standards and secured a multi-year licence extension. Minor observations regarding documentation, staffing deployment, and administrative processes were identified but did not impede the renewal process. Staffing challenges persist as the team works to improve shift fill rates through enhanced recruitment strategies and flexible scheduling. The review highlighted the collaborative effort across maintenance, administration, and frontline personnel in maintaining high service quality. All identified areas for improvement have been addressed or are actively being managed by the relevant departments. The committee approved the receipt of the report and the associated land transfer recommendations to align with regional planning goals.
02:05:08 Speaker 28: that report PSRCW 0526 regarding the
02:05:10 Speaker 28: twenty. Regarding the 2025 Land Ambulance
02:05:13 Speaker 28: Service review results, be received for
02:05:17 Speaker 28: information. May I ask for a
02:05:20 Speaker 28: mover in a second? Moved by
02:05:22 Speaker 28: Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Kevney.
02:05:24 Speaker 28: It's on the floor for discussion.
02:05:26 Speaker 28: Director McNab, the lectern is yours.
02:05:28 Speaker 28: Good morning again, Ward and County
02:05:30 Speaker 28: Council. Really happy to be here
02:05:32 Speaker 28: today to talk about this. The
02:05:34 Speaker 28: results of our last service review.
02:05:35 Speaker 28: Every three years, we go through
02:05:37 Speaker 28: a service review here. It lasts
02:05:38 Speaker 28: a couple of days, and the
02:05:42 Speaker 28: last one that took place was
02:05:44 Speaker 28: last October on the 15th and
02:05:46 Speaker 28: 16th. It's held by the or
02:05:49 Speaker 28: performed by the Ministry of Health
02:05:51 Speaker 28: Emergency Health Regulatory and Accountability Branch.
02:05:55 Speaker 28: And again, they spend a couple
02:05:57 Speaker 28: days on site, more or less
02:06:00 Speaker 28: going through our entire service, looking
02:06:03 Speaker 28: at patient care, quality assurance, administration.
02:06:05 Speaker 28: Literally, I would say thousands of
02:06:07 Speaker 28: data points. They have a team
02:06:08 Speaker 28: lead, and then they have a
02:06:10 Speaker 28: management lead and a paramedic lead.
02:06:12 Speaker 28: They also bring somebody from fleet
02:06:17 Speaker 28: services from the ministry to look
02:06:19 Speaker 28: at our vehicles, and then they
02:06:21 Speaker 28: also bring paramedics to look at
02:06:22 Speaker 28: multiple factors from the bases to
02:06:24 Speaker 28: the vehicles to the. They go
02:06:25 Speaker 28: to the hospitals to look at
02:06:26 Speaker 28: patient care. They audit our ACRs,
02:06:28 Speaker 28: so they really go through all
02:06:30 Speaker 28: more or less every entity of
02:06:33 Speaker 28: the service delivery that we offer
02:06:34 Speaker 28: here, and they compare it to
02:06:36 Speaker 28: the standard and the regulations that
02:06:39 Speaker 28: we must follow to operate an
02:06:40 Speaker 28: ambulance service. So the Rio come,
02:06:42 Speaker 28: we met all the requirements of.
02:06:43 Speaker 28: the Ministry Health Service review, and
02:06:46 Speaker 28: we were recommended for a three-year
02:06:48 Speaker 28: extension of their of our licence,
02:06:51 Speaker 28: and that was in June of
02:06:53 Speaker 28: this year. We did get observations.
02:06:55 Speaker 28: There was nine in total. Four
02:06:56 Speaker 28: of them were around documentation. We
02:06:58 Speaker 28: also had an observation around deployment
02:07:00 Speaker 28: in regards to staffing and meeting
02:07:01 Speaker 28: the deployment plan. We had a
02:07:02 Speaker 28: paramedic that had an immunization. that
02:07:03 Speaker 28: was didn't have a signature on
02:07:05 Speaker 28: it, but was corrected. A paramedic
02:07:06 Speaker 28: that didn't have their ID on
02:07:08 Speaker 28: their person. It was a bit
02:07:10 Speaker 28: of a contention. It was in
02:07:11 Speaker 28: their in her sweater and inside
02:07:14 Speaker 28: the base, but it wasn't on
02:07:16 Speaker 28: her person. But, anyways, was fine.
02:07:17 Speaker 28: Loose equipment behind the vehicles, gloves
02:07:20 Speaker 28: and stuff like that, and four.
02:07:22 Speaker 28: And then a couple around egress
02:07:23 Speaker 28: stickers and some certification documents that
02:07:24 Speaker 28: we just had to fix up.
02:07:26 Speaker 28: So the observations primarily relate to
02:07:27 Speaker 28: the staffing, documentation, and administrative processes.
02:07:28 Speaker 28: None of the observations prevented the
02:07:30 Speaker 28: renewal, and we submitted all our
02:07:31 Speaker 28: responses, corrected everything that was identified,
02:07:34 Speaker 28: mostly at the time, and then
02:07:35 Speaker 28: also over the period of time
02:07:38 Speaker 28: between the review of the summary
02:07:48 Speaker 28: report and the final report. We
02:07:50 Speaker 28: we built this the service here
02:07:52 Speaker 28: around the regulation and standards. Everything
02:07:53 Speaker 15: that we do revolves around that.
02:07:55 Speaker 15: we do revolves around them. All
02:07:57 Speaker 15: our processes and all the things
02:07:59 Speaker 15: that we have in place are
02:08:02 Speaker 15: to meet them day in and
02:08:04 Speaker 15: day out. And I think that
02:08:05 Speaker 15: speaks to the work that the
02:08:06 Speaker 15: paramedics do, the supervisors, the managers,
02:08:07 Speaker 15: the administrative staff, and then also
02:08:11 Speaker 15: the support from county council and
02:08:13 Speaker 15: the SMT and all the departments.
02:08:14 Speaker 15: Got to give a shout out
02:08:15 Speaker 15: to our maintenance staff that maintain
02:08:18 Speaker 15: our vehicles top notch and all
02:08:21 Speaker 15: our equipment. Do the testing on
02:08:24 Speaker 08: it, and then whether it's IT
02:08:29 Speaker 08: or finance or clerks, whether Clerks,
02:08:30 Speaker 08: the agreements we touch almost every
02:08:35 Speaker 08: department in this county, and it
02:08:37 Speaker 08: makes a difference when it comes
02:08:39 Speaker 08: to the service review. There's a
02:08:42 Speaker 08: lot of work to get ready
02:08:44 Speaker 08: for it, but really, what it
02:08:46 Speaker 08: is is just looking at all
02:08:48 Speaker 08: the evidence that we do over
02:08:49 Speaker 08: the last three years to be
02:08:51 Speaker 08: able to show them all our
02:08:51 Speaker 08: processes and what we have in
02:08:53 Speaker 08: place. So, really happy for the
02:08:54 Speaker 08: team. It was very successful, even
02:08:56 Speaker 08: though we had some observations. But
02:08:58 Speaker 08: I would say just an excellent
02:09:00 Speaker 08: job all around. So, and we
02:09:01 Speaker 08: we continue to learn from these
02:09:04 Speaker 08: observations. and put things in place
02:09:08 Speaker 08: to help shore it up. I
02:09:11 Speaker 08: don't know if we'll ever get
02:09:13 Speaker 08: rid of the documentation. I hope
02:09:16 Speaker 08: someday that we will, but I
02:09:20 Speaker 08: don't think so. So there's always
02:09:24 Speaker 08: going to be something that they'll
02:09:26 Speaker 08: find when they're auditing multiple data
02:09:29 Speaker 08: points on an ambulance call report.
02:09:33 Speaker 08: But again, we'll continue to to
02:09:35 Speaker 08: try to make that better each
02:09:36 Speaker 08: time, and make it a service
02:09:38 Speaker 08: that everybody's proud of. Thank you.
02:09:40 Speaker 08: very much, and thank you for
02:09:43 Speaker 08: highlighting that it it's it's a
02:09:44 Speaker 08: teamwork in progress to make
02:09:46 Speaker 08: sure that all the the various
02:09:47 Speaker 08: departments contribute to that success that
02:09:49 Speaker 08: you've that you've described. So congratulations
02:09:50 Speaker 08: to your participation, but thank you
02:09:52 Speaker 08: also for mentioning the other departments.
02:09:55 Speaker 08: I understand the deputy CAO would
02:09:57 Speaker 08: like to have a few words
02:09:59 Speaker 08: before I open it to committee.
02:10:02 Speaker 08: The whole members. Thank you very
02:10:03 Speaker 08: much, Madam Warden. So over the
02:10:05 Speaker 08: last year or so, as I've
02:10:14 Speaker 08: had the opportunity to work with
02:10:16 Speaker 08: with Kevin and members of Kevin's
02:10:17 Speaker 08: team, Kevin comes across as an
02:10:19 Speaker 15: incredibly quiet-spoken gentleman. He he effuses
02:10:22 Speaker 15: modesty when it comes to the
02:10:27 Speaker 15: service. We discussed whether or not
02:10:29 Speaker 15: to even put those nine things
02:10:31 Speaker 20: in. These are nine things
02:10:33 Speaker 20: where somebody had a a card
02:10:37 Speaker 20: in a sweater that wasn't on
02:10:44 Speaker 20: their person at the time. These
02:10:46 Speaker 20: are very very minor things that
02:10:50 Speaker 20: the team spent a week looking.
02:10:53 Speaker 20: for. I had the opportunity to
02:10:55 Speaker 28: delve in and meet the team
02:10:57 Speaker 28: that came in to start the
02:11:00 Speaker 28: inspection work, and I met them
02:11:02 Speaker 28: at the start and I met
02:11:03 Speaker 28: them at the end, and I
02:11:05 Speaker 28: saw them midway through. And midway
02:11:06 Speaker 28: through this room here, the table
02:11:09 Speaker 28: was covered from one end to
02:11:11 Speaker 28: the other with pieces of paper
02:11:13 Speaker 28: that they were flitting through and
02:11:17 Speaker 28: looking for things that the the
02:11:19 Speaker 28: team can improve on. Kevin leads
02:11:20 Speaker 28: an incredible team of of both
02:11:22 Speaker 28: his management team and the front
02:11:24 Speaker 28: line. And the frontline paramedics doing
02:11:26 Speaker 28: an outstanding body of work. This
02:11:28 Speaker 28: we present this report in Kevin's
02:11:30 Speaker 28: modest tenure and tone, but this
02:11:33 Speaker 28: is a shining example of what
02:11:36 Speaker 28: Gray County does incredibly well. We
02:11:38 Speaker 28: have a paramedic team that, as
02:11:39 Speaker 28: a council, I am sure and
02:11:41 Speaker 28: I know you are proud of,
02:11:42 Speaker 28: and this report really does offer
02:11:46 Speaker 28: glowing praise for the work of
02:11:48 Speaker 28: Kevin. Kevin's management team, and every
02:11:50 Speaker 28: single one of our frontline paramedics
02:11:51 Speaker 28: provide daily service inside and out
02:11:54 Speaker 28: to members of community at Grey
02:11:56 Speaker 28: County. And so, I'd like to
02:11:58 Speaker 28: offer my congratulations as well to
02:11:59 Speaker 28: Kevin on on an outstanding job.
02:12:00 Speaker 28: And hopefully, I have been a
02:12:03 Speaker 28: little conveyed some of my enthusiasm
02:12:04 Speaker 28: for the work of Kevin and
02:12:07 Speaker 28: his team, and and tried to
02:12:08 Speaker 28: beat down some of Kevin's modesty
02:12:10 Speaker 28: on this one because it really
02:12:12 Speaker 28: is a a triumph. Excellent, thank
02:12:13 Speaker 28: you. So let me open it
02:12:15 Speaker 28: up to the floor for questions
02:12:17 Speaker 28: or comments. We'll begin with alternate
02:12:18 Speaker 28: Councillor Kepke. Thank you, Warden, and
02:12:20 Speaker 28: to you, Kevin. Congratulations as well,
02:12:21 Speaker 28: extended on your service that you
02:12:23 Speaker 28: do provide. My questions regarding the
02:12:26 Speaker 28: first observation: deployment, staffing, and maintaining
02:12:27 Speaker 28: sufficient staff. How is that being
02:12:29 Speaker 28: handled? Staffing over the last five
02:12:31 Speaker 28: years, say since COVID, has been
02:12:33 Speaker 28: difficult. Attracting staff, you know, getting
02:12:34 Speaker 28: staff to to work, you know,
02:12:36 Speaker 28: is able to meet the needs
02:12:39 Speaker 28: of the deployment plan. It has
02:12:41 Speaker 28: been tough, and so when you
02:12:42 Speaker 28: look at the numbers, we're filling
02:12:43 Speaker 28: between ninety six to ninety seven
02:12:46 Speaker 28: percent of the shifts, but we're
02:12:50 Speaker 28: still not one hundred percent. So
02:12:51 Speaker 28: We're still not a hundred percent,
02:12:52 Speaker 28: so but so but we continue
02:12:57 Speaker 28: to work on that. The way
02:13:00 Speaker 28: we do things here, we have
02:13:02 Speaker 28: we offer overtime on areas where
02:13:04 Speaker 28: we have known where we sometimes
02:13:06 Speaker 28: have more absences, like on weekends.
02:13:08 Speaker 15: We, if we can, we upstaff
02:13:12 Speaker 15: ahead of time with some people
02:13:13 Speaker 15: to try to absorb those first
02:13:16 Speaker 15: number of book offs to be
02:13:18 Speaker 15: able to maintain. We can pull
02:13:19 Speaker 15: from our CP programme. We have
02:13:20 Speaker 15: supervisors that can work. We have
02:13:22 Speaker 15: on call that comes in. We
02:13:25 Speaker 15: have managers to back up. I
02:13:27 Speaker 15: came in at Christmas. You know,
02:13:28 Speaker 15: I mean, like just it's ongoing.
02:13:30 Speaker 15: I I must say though, every
02:13:32 Speaker 15: year it gets better. We went
02:13:35 Speaker 15: through this in 2004. I would
02:13:37 Speaker 15: say it was probably worse then.
02:13:38 Speaker 15: We're coming out of it. It's
02:13:41 Speaker 15: not over yet. We're not like
02:13:43 Speaker 15: unlike other places. There may be
02:13:46 Speaker 15: some services in Ontario that aren't
02:13:48 Speaker 15: having trouble, but I would say
02:13:50 Speaker 15: most are still having trouble or
02:13:53 Speaker 15: or just coming. out of it
02:13:56 Speaker 15: as well. I just and also
02:13:58 Speaker 15: through this we've had growth, and
02:14:00 Speaker 15: I just kind of anticipated maybe
02:14:02 Speaker 15: a question around this, so I
02:14:05 Speaker 15: did write some numbers just to
02:14:11 Speaker 15: have available. Like so far this
02:14:13 Speaker 15: year, we're still sitting around ninety
02:14:17 Speaker 15: six and a half percent of
02:14:20 Speaker 15: the shifts that we're filling, three
02:14:23 Speaker 15: and a half that we're not.
02:14:24 Speaker 15: That equals to two hundred seventy
02:14:27 Speaker 15: four. But I go back in
02:14:29 Speaker 15: the last two years, we've added
02:14:31 Speaker 15: twenty five hundred and fifty five
02:14:33 Speaker 15: shifts, so we're still twenty two
02:14:36 Speaker 15: hundred more than we were. two
02:14:39 Speaker 15: years ago at this time when
02:14:42 Speaker 15: we had downsizing, so it is
02:14:45 Speaker 15: not fixed yet. But we are
02:14:48 Speaker 15: working on it. At one time,
02:14:50 Speaker 15: we used to only hire once
02:14:53 Speaker 15: a year. Now we hire twice
02:14:55 Speaker 15: a year. But but each year
02:14:58 Speaker 15: gets better. And again, we have.
02:15:01 Speaker 15: I would say we're coming out
02:15:03 Speaker 15: of it, but but we're not
02:15:05 Speaker 15: out of it yet. Okay. Thank
02:15:07 Speaker 15: you. Any further questions or comments?
02:15:11 Speaker 15: Okay. I'm not seeing any further.
02:15:13 Speaker 15: hands. All those in favour? That
02:15:15 Speaker 15: motion is carried. Thank you again,
02:15:17 Speaker 15: and thank you to all of
02:15:19 Speaker 15: your team. So with that, yes,
02:15:21 Speaker 15: appropriately, with ten minutes before we
02:15:23 Speaker 15: know our lunches about to to
02:15:26 Speaker 15: arrive, I'm going to read out
02:15:29 Speaker 15: the recommended motion. That might take
02:15:32 Speaker 15: me five minutes because this one's
02:15:34 Speaker 15: a little bit long, and it's
02:15:37 Speaker 15: not a not a committee committee
02:15:40 Speaker 15: motion where I can refer to
02:15:42 Speaker 15: what's already been published. I think
02:15:44 Speaker 15: this one needs to be read
02:15:46 Speaker 15: for clarity. so it is recommended
02:15:48 Speaker 15: that report PDRCW thirty four twenty
02:15:51 Speaker 15: six be received, and that the
02:15:53 Speaker 15: land exchange between the county
02:15:56 Speaker 15: and the township of Southgate for
02:15:58 Speaker 15: nominal consideration for the following lands
02:16:00 Speaker 15: abutting the CP rail trail in
02:16:04 Speaker 15: Dundalk be approved to align with
02:16:07 Speaker 15: the township of Southgate's long term
02:16:10 Speaker 15: plans for the section of Dundalk,
02:16:12 Speaker 15: the town, the county lands described
02:16:16 Speaker 15: as part of Lot two to
02:16:18 Speaker 15: nine concession two. nine concession two
02:16:19 Speaker 15: southwest of the Toronto and Sydney
02:16:22 Speaker 18: Road, being part one in the
02:16:23 Speaker 18: attached draft reference plan, be transferred
02:16:25 Speaker 18: to Southgate. The township lands described
02:16:26 Speaker 18: as part of lot two two
02:16:29 Speaker 18: nine concession two southwest of the
02:16:32 Speaker 18: Toronto and Sydney Road, being parts
02:16:33 Speaker 18: twelve and thirteen in the attached
02:16:36 Speaker 18: reference plan, be transferred to the
02:16:39 Speaker 18: county, and that the county waive
02:16:41 Speaker 18: the requirement for a bylaw to
02:16:43 Speaker 18: execute the land transfer agreement as
02:16:45 Speaker 18: set out in the county's sale
02:16:47 Speaker 18: of land procedure G G E
02:16:48 Speaker 18: N zero three zero zero three
02:16:51 Speaker 18: zero zero one and acquisition of
02:16:54 Speaker 18: land procedure G G E N
02:16:56 Speaker 18: zero zero three zero zero two
02:16:58 Speaker 18: and any successor thereto, and that
02:16:59 Speaker 18: the warden and clerk be authorised
02:17:00 Speaker 18: to execute the land exchange agreement
02:17:02 Speaker 18: once finalized, and that the staff
02:17:04 Speaker 18: be directed to incorporate language into
02:17:06 Speaker 18: the language the land exchange agreement
02:17:09 Speaker 18: to address the cost sharing arrangements
02:17:10 Speaker 18: between the county and Southgate that
02:17:12 Speaker 18: were previously outlined in the cost
02:17:15 Speaker 18: sharing agreement dated October six, twenty
02:17:16 Speaker 18: twenty one, to the extent required
02:17:19 Speaker 18: based on the new long term
02:17:20 Speaker 18: plans for this area of Dundalk,
02:17:22 Speaker 18: and that staff be directed to
02:17:24 Speaker 18: release various parcels of land from
02:17:26 Speaker 18: the cost sharing agreement registered in
02:17:27 Speaker 18: the land. Registry Office of Gray
02:17:30 Speaker 18: Number Sixteen as Instrument GY Two
02:17:32 Speaker 18: One Five Zero Three Zero, as
02:17:34 Speaker 18: deemed necessary to effect the long-term
02:17:36 Speaker 18: plans for this area of Dundalk,
02:17:38 Speaker 18: and deemed appropriate through consultation with
02:17:41 Speaker 18: the Director of Planning, CAO and
02:17:42 Speaker 18: Deputy CAO, and the County Solicitor,
02:17:44 Speaker 18: and that staff be authorised to
02:17:47 Speaker 18: carry out the above prior to
02:17:49 Speaker 18: the County Council approval, as per
02:17:50 Speaker 18: Section Twenty Six Point Six. Twenty-six
02:17:53 Speaker 18: point six B of our procedural
02:17:55 Speaker 18: bylaw fifty-one thirty-four twenty-two. May I
02:17:58 Speaker 18: ask for a mover and a
02:17:59 Speaker 18: second? Moved by the deputy warden.
02:18:01 Speaker 18: Looking, yeah, that's right. Could you
02:18:04 Speaker 18: repeat that? And seconded by by
02:18:05 Speaker 18: Councillor Dobreen. It's now on the
02:18:07 Speaker 18: floor for discussion. Welcome, Director Taylor,
02:18:10 Speaker 18: to the lectern. Thanks, Madam Warden,
02:18:12 Speaker 18: and and this report was truly
02:18:18 Speaker 18: a team effort between Legal Services
02:18:19 Speaker 18: Clerk. Between legal services clerks and
02:18:21 Speaker 18: planning, the downside of a team
02:18:22 Speaker 18: effort between legal services clerks and
02:18:24 Speaker 18: planning is you get emotion, like
02:18:26 Speaker 18: you just read. So, appreciate your
02:18:28 Speaker 18: patience. This is just very briefly
02:18:30 Speaker 18: following up on a past closed
02:18:33 Speaker 18: session discussion where staff received direction
02:18:35 Speaker 18: back in September 2025, and that
02:18:37 Speaker 18: was to work with Township of
02:18:39 Speaker 18: Southgate staff to investigate a potential
02:18:41 Speaker 18: land swap, if you will. And
02:18:44 Speaker 18: these lands are alongside the CP
02:18:46 Speaker 18: rail trail, as we talked about
02:18:47 Speaker 18: earlier in council. rate in in
02:18:49 Speaker 18: downtown Dundalk, and essentially the county
02:18:51 Speaker 18: would be would be trading lands
02:18:54 Speaker 18: sort of on on the east
02:18:57 Speaker 18: side of the trail for lands
02:18:59 Speaker 18: on the west side of the
02:19:02 Speaker 18: trail with the township. And as
02:19:04 Speaker 18: some might recall, there was a
02:19:06 Speaker 18: land donation agreement done back in
02:19:08 Speaker 18: 2021 when the township was looking
02:19:10 Speaker 18: at a new medical clinic in
02:19:14 Speaker 18: this area, and there were some
02:19:17 Speaker 18: commitments through that land donation agreement
02:19:19 Speaker 18: that that Southgate took on as
02:19:20 Speaker 18: part of that agreement. In speaking
02:19:24 Speaker 18: further with township staff, there's some
02:19:27 Speaker 18: of those commitments that are no
02:19:28 Speaker 18: longer relevant now that the medical
02:19:30 Speaker 18: clinic plans might be changed. And
02:19:32 Speaker 18: as such, through this this motion
02:19:34 Speaker 18: and this report, we're looking for
02:19:35 Speaker 18: some leeway to to release some
02:19:36 Speaker 18: of those commitments, but but still
02:19:37 Speaker 18: continue on with some, including some
02:19:38 Speaker 18: of the trail upgrades and and
02:19:40 Speaker 18: the the need for exploration of
02:19:41 Speaker 18: future parking in this area. Council
02:19:44 Speaker 18: may recall there was a further
02:19:46 Speaker 18: land sale to Midwest Co-op in
02:19:48 Speaker 15: 2024. That sale has been completed,
02:19:52 Speaker 15: and and the old mill building
02:19:55 Speaker 15: just near here has since been
02:19:57 Speaker 15: torn down. So Southgate staff took
02:20:00 Speaker 15: this this matter to their council
02:20:05 Speaker 17: on August 5th. At that time,
02:20:07 Speaker 17: Southgate staff outlined sort of the
02:20:09 Speaker 17: long term plans for this area,
02:20:12 Speaker 17: including a series of of potential
02:20:16 Speaker 17: changes between the county and township,
02:20:19 Speaker 17: which we're hearing about today, and
02:20:20 Speaker 17: also further discussions between the the
02:20:24 Speaker 17: township and and Midwest Co-op in
02:20:26 Speaker 17: that regard. With that report. township
02:20:30 Speaker 17: council supported this this land swap,
02:20:31 Speaker 17: and if you will, the the
02:20:39 Speaker 17: lands really are a a like
02:20:41 Speaker 17: for like, and they're being traded
02:20:43 Speaker 17: in in an as is condition.
02:20:48 Speaker 15: The only reason why on map
02:20:50 Speaker 15: two the lands look slightly larger
02:20:52 Speaker 15: that the county is getting is
02:20:54 Speaker 15: because part twelve currently contains a
02:20:57 Speaker 15: a small hydro easement. So in
02:20:58 Speaker 26: order for for the county to
02:21:00 Speaker 26: get a similar sized parcel, which
02:21:02 Speaker 26: is part thirteen to part one,
02:21:05 Speaker 26: which they're trading, we we didn't.
02:21:07 Speaker 26: count those those hydro easement lands
02:21:09 Speaker 26: in the total, and then finally
02:21:12 Speaker 26: the reason for the motion being
02:21:14 Speaker 26: quite as as long as it
02:21:17 Speaker 26: is is because we are coming
02:21:18 Speaker 26: up to the restricted acts deadline
02:21:21 Speaker 26: under the municipal act, and and
02:21:23 Speaker 26: to make sure we're we're keeping
02:21:24 Speaker 26: with with the legislative requirements in
02:21:27 Speaker 26: this regard, we've consulted with both
02:21:29 Speaker 26: the clerk and legal services, and
02:21:30 Speaker 26: as such, there's clauses in the
02:21:32 Speaker 26: in the motion which, if supported
02:21:35 Speaker 26: today, would allow for this this
02:21:36 Speaker 26: land transfer agreement or land exchange
02:21:39 Speaker 26: agreement to be finalized without the
02:21:42 Speaker 26: need for a bylaw coming back
02:21:45 Speaker 26: to council. There is documentation in
02:21:48 Speaker 26: the report. The direction under which
02:21:49 Speaker 26: staff would be would be negotiating
02:21:51 Speaker 26: that agreement. So if council supports
02:21:53 Speaker 18: this recommendation here today, it would
02:21:55 Speaker 18: it would simply not require that
02:21:56 Speaker 18: bylaw. With that, I am happy
02:21:59 Speaker 18: to turn it back to you,
02:22:00 Speaker 18: Madam Warden. But I just note
02:22:03 Speaker 18: that we have both the clerk
02:22:05 Speaker 18: and Ms. Lacey Thompson and in
02:22:07 Speaker 18: the back. Lacey Thompson in in
02:22:08 Speaker 18: the back. If there are any
02:22:09 Speaker 18: technical questions, thank you. Okay, thank
02:22:12 Speaker 18: you for that introduction. So with
02:22:14 Speaker 18: that, I'll put it out to
02:22:17 Speaker 18: committee. The whole, any questions or
02:22:20 Speaker 18: comments? Okay, we'll go to Councillor
02:22:22 Speaker 18: Eccles. Just for clarity, the reason
02:22:25 Speaker 18: that we're not doing the bylaws
02:22:27 Speaker 18: because of lame duck period may
02:22:29 Speaker 18: or may not kick in, but
02:22:32 Speaker 18: if we did the motion today.
02:22:34 Speaker 18: to prepare the bylaw, would that
02:22:36 Speaker 18: not step ahead? That it was
02:22:38 Speaker 18: granted to be prepared before lame
02:22:40 Speaker 18: duck. I guess it's a timing
02:22:43 Speaker 18: issue. I just feel a little
02:22:45 Speaker 18: at ease that we do everything
02:22:46 Speaker 18: by bylaw, and yet on something
02:22:50 Speaker 18: that is at that time sensitive,
02:22:54 Speaker 18: that we need to bypass that
02:22:57 Speaker 18: procedure. Okay, so I think I'm
02:22:59 Speaker 18: going to begin with the quorum.
02:23:00 Speaker 18: I'll start with Madam Quorum. Thank
02:23:01 Speaker 18: you and to you, Madam Warden.
02:23:04 Speaker 18: As staff, I think we can
02:23:05 Speaker 15: relate to your somewhat discomfort in
02:23:08 Speaker 15: proceeding without a bylaw. However, my
02:23:09 Speaker 15: understanding is that this is a
02:23:15 Speaker 15: time-sensitive matter, but perhaps Director Taylor
02:23:16 Speaker 15: could elabourate on that a little
02:23:17 Speaker 15: bit. This is the last regular
02:23:19 Speaker 15: meeting that we have scheduled. for
02:23:20 Speaker 15: County Council before we may go
02:23:21 Speaker 15: into the lame duck position next
02:23:24 Speaker 15: Friday on the 21st, and the
02:23:27 Speaker 15: next meeting would be September 10th.
02:23:28 Speaker 15: So the bylaw would be the
02:23:30 Speaker 15: final step in that approval process,
02:23:33 Speaker 15: having it passed by County Council.
02:23:34 Speaker 15: And unfortunately, if we are in
02:23:37 Speaker 15: a lame duck position in September,
02:23:39 Speaker 15: that bylaw isn't able to be
02:23:41 Speaker 15: passed because it's one of the
02:23:44 Speaker 15: restricted acts in the Municipal Act.
02:23:47 Speaker 15: So this is the the last
02:23:48 Speaker 15: possible. time, as staff, we felt
02:23:52 Speaker 15: we could bring it forward and
02:23:54 Speaker 15: still fit the legislative framework that
02:23:56 Speaker 15: we're working within. Okay, Dr. Taylor,
02:23:57 Speaker 15: did you want to add anything
02:23:57 Speaker 15: to that? Sure, thank you, Madam.
02:23:59 Speaker 15: I don't have a lot to
02:24:01 Speaker 15: add here. I will say that
02:24:03 Speaker 15: that both the clerk and and
02:24:06 Speaker 15: legal services department were were very
02:24:12 Speaker 15: helpful in this, and we talked
02:24:13 Speaker 15: about all options, including would we
02:24:14 Speaker 15: schedule a separate county council meeting
02:24:18 Speaker 15: after this ahead of a This
02:24:19 Speaker 15: ahead of ahead of that restricted
02:24:22 Speaker 15: access period, in this case, the
02:24:24 Speaker 15: reason staff put this forward on
02:24:29 Speaker 15: the agenda day is because we
02:24:31 Speaker 15: had had that past school session
02:24:32 Speaker 35: discussion approximately a year ago, so
02:24:34 Speaker 35: September 2025, and we do understand
02:24:38 Speaker 35: in in talking with the the
02:24:39 Speaker 35: township that this is a small
02:24:42 Speaker 35: piece of of the larger plans
02:24:45 Speaker 35: for downtown Dundalk, some of which
02:24:46 Speaker 35: are time sensitive on their end.
02:24:48 Speaker 35: So, while this might not be
02:24:49 Speaker 35: a extreme time sensitive priority to
02:24:50 Speaker 35: Time-sensitive priority to to the county
02:24:52 Speaker 35: of Grey. We think in in
02:24:54 Speaker 35: working with the township as as
02:24:55 Speaker 35: a municipal partner, and certainly through
02:24:58 Speaker 35: the ward. And invite any comments
02:25:00 Speaker 35: from our our township of Southgate
02:25:02 Speaker 35: representatives here today. We thought
02:25:05 Speaker 35: it was best to to
02:25:08 Speaker 35: put this on on the agenda
02:25:12 Speaker 35: for council's consideration to to see
02:25:14 Speaker 35: to see the feedback here today.
02:25:17 Speaker 35: Okay. Anything else? All right. I
02:25:19 Speaker 35: don't see any further hands. Then
02:25:21 Speaker 35: you have the information. in front
02:25:26 Speaker 35: of us. I'll call the question.
02:25:27 Speaker 35: All those in favour, and that
02:25:30 Speaker 35: motion is carried. Thank you very
02:25:33 Speaker 35: much, Director Taylor, and Madam Clerk.
02:25:35 Speaker 35: I'll just consult with you in
02:25:36 Speaker 35: terms of timing. Okay, so at
02:25:39 Speaker 35: some point we will break for
02:25:42 Speaker 35: lunch when we know that it's
02:25:44 Speaker 35: arrived, but we're going to keep
02:25:46 Speaker 35: working until that happens. So with
02:25:49 Speaker 35: that, then I would like to
02:25:52 Speaker 35: go to item seven F, and
02:25:56 Speaker 35: it is recommended that staff report
02:25:58 Speaker 35: PDR CW twenty eight twenty six
02:26:01 Speaker 35: for. W twenty eight twenty six
02:26:03 Speaker 35: regarding the pursuit of an upper
7.f PDR-CW-28-26 Considering an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan for Grey County
Council considered an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan for Grey County to support affordable housing and transit corridors within the ten-year capital budget. The proposal suggests including related costs in the development charges background study and phasing the project through analysis, capacity evaluation, and programme design. Council members debated establishing this plan to provide flexible incentives for affordable housing development by waiving current funding restrictions on nonprofits and land acquisition. Speakers noted that while legislative ability exists, implementation requires further work on budgeting, sequencing activities, and reporting back before any money is earmarked.
02:26:05 Speaker 35: tier community improvement plan for Gray
02:26:08 Speaker 35: County be received and that the
02:26:11 Speaker 35: committee the whole the hereby direct
02:26:12 Speaker 35: staff to add the commute the
02:26:14 Speaker 35: county CIP as a project within
02:26:15 Speaker 35: the ten year capital budget from
02:26:17 Speaker 35: twenty twenty seven to twenty thirty
02:26:19 Speaker 35: six for the planning department to
02:26:21 Speaker 35: include it within the development charges
02:26:23 Speaker 35: background study and we'll hear from
02:26:25 Speaker 35: senior policy planner Buckton in just
02:26:28 Speaker 35: a moment I'll ask for a
02:26:30 Speaker 35: move. A moment. I'll ask for
02:26:33 Speaker 35: a mover and a seconder to
02:26:35 Speaker 35: get it on the floor. We've
02:26:37 Speaker 35: got it moved by Councillor Dobrind,
02:26:38 Speaker 35: seconded by alternate Councillor Kepke. It's
02:26:40 Speaker 35: now on the floor for discussion.
02:26:43 Speaker 35: Welcome. What might be just ahead
02:26:45 Speaker 35: of lunch? Thank you so very
02:26:48 Speaker 35: much. And planners are going to
02:26:51 Speaker 35: get a reputation here, right? Um.
02:26:56 Speaker 35: Thank Thank you so much. Really
02:26:57 Speaker 35: glad to be here today. Are
02:26:59 Speaker 35: you able to control that from
02:27:02 Speaker 35: your end? Or yep. Okay. Amazing,
02:27:04 Speaker 35: thank you. So we will be
02:27:06 Speaker 35: brief in the event that lunch
02:27:08 Speaker 35: just arrives the second I started
02:27:11 Speaker 35: talking. There is Murphy's law and
02:27:12 Speaker 35: dictates. So we'll we'll jump right
02:27:14 Speaker 35: in. So as you noted, the
02:27:16 Speaker 35: report focuses around community improvement plans
02:27:20 Speaker 35: and and contemplating a plan for
02:27:23 Speaker 35: Gray County at the upper tier
02:27:26 Speaker 35: level. I thought I better start
02:27:27 Speaker 35: where where we usually need to
02:27:28 Speaker 35: start, which is what is a
02:27:31 Speaker 35: community improvement plan. I think those
02:27:33 Speaker 35: around this table will know. but
02:27:35 Speaker 35: for anybody else who may be
02:27:37 Speaker 35: watching or or listening in, a
02:27:40 Speaker 35: community improvement plan is a flexible
02:27:43 Speaker 35: tool under the Planning Act that
02:27:46 Speaker 35: allows municipalities to offer targeted incentives
02:27:47 Speaker 35: to support various different community projects
02:27:48 Speaker 35: or outcomes. Oftentimes, there are prohibitions,
02:27:51 Speaker 35: for example, within the Municipal Act
02:27:53 Speaker 35: around bonusing or or providing incentives,
02:27:54 Speaker 35: but this tool creates the framework
02:27:57 Speaker 35: within which we we can do
02:28:00 Speaker 35: so. legally, and so various different
02:28:01 Speaker 35: programme types can can be part
02:28:03 Speaker 35: of a community improvement plan. I
02:28:05 Speaker 35: know that answers are familiar with
02:28:06 Speaker 35: the tax increment equivalent grants, and
02:28:11 Speaker 35: we've seen some of those at
02:28:13 Speaker 35: county level in conjunction with lower
02:28:15 Speaker 35: tier CIP initiatives. There's a variety
02:28:16 Speaker 35: of other tools that can be
02:28:19 Speaker 35: enacted through CIP, such as grants
02:28:22 Speaker 35: and loans, and the CIP document
02:28:24 Speaker 35: itself outlines the criteria that. would
02:28:27 Speaker 35: apply for eligibility and the programme
02:28:29 Speaker 35: itself. So the county has, since
02:28:31 Speaker 35: 2019, administered a countywide CAP programme,
02:28:34 Speaker 35: but that has been implemented through
02:28:36 Speaker 35: member municipalities and their local official
02:28:39 Speaker 35: plans. So up until just recently,
02:28:41 Speaker 35: upper tier municipalities required to be
02:28:44 Speaker 35: prescribed to have an upper tier
02:28:45 Speaker 35: CAP, and I might be getting
02:28:48 Speaker 35: a little ahead of myself, a
02:28:50 Speaker 35: slide or two, but that has
02:28:52 Speaker 35: changed with Bill 60, and we
02:28:54 Speaker 35: can now. have an upper tier
02:28:56 Speaker 35: plan. So through the existing programme,
02:28:59 Speaker 35: the county has supported local municipalities
02:29:01 Speaker 35: with the CIP programme design. We've
02:29:04 Speaker 35: provided a templated document, kind of
02:29:05 Speaker 35: outlining how those CIPs might be
02:29:07 Speaker 35: structured. We've supported with some coordination
02:29:11 Speaker 35: and monitoring, and I know Savannah's
02:29:12 Speaker 35: team keeps some stats and does
02:29:14 Speaker 35: reporting back to town council around
02:29:17 Speaker 35: our participation with those programmemes as
02:29:20 Speaker 35: well. And we have offered and
02:29:22 Speaker 35: and and do offer aligned heritage
02:29:24 Speaker 35: tax rebates. and tax incremental equivalent
02:29:27 Speaker 35: grants, again for those local CIPs
02:29:28 Speaker 35: supported projects. As I noted, there
02:29:31 Speaker 35: has been changes to legislation that
02:29:32 Speaker 35: would allow for upper tier CIPs
02:29:33 Speaker 35: to to have or sort of
02:29:36 Speaker 35: upper tier municipalities to have CIPs,
02:29:37 Speaker 35: but it is a sculpted list
02:29:39 Speaker 35: of matters that those upper tier
02:29:41 Speaker 35: CIPs can address. So I've just
02:29:43 Speaker 35: listed those here on the slide,
02:29:46 Speaker 35: but would highlight affordable housing as
02:29:48 Speaker 35: being one. Housing is being one
02:29:49 Speaker 35: of those items in particular, also
02:29:54 Speaker 35: including infrastructure and lands and buildings
02:29:56 Speaker 35: with respect to transit corridors. So,
02:29:58 Speaker 35: also on the screen, we've got
02:30:01 Speaker 35: a lovely image there of the
02:30:03 Speaker 35: Housing Action Plan. So that had
02:30:05 Speaker 35: been endorsed by County Council in
02:30:06 Speaker 35: 2023, and within that document, there
02:30:09 Speaker 35: is a stated intent to
02:30:11 Speaker 35: maintain those CIP-related incentives to support
02:30:13 Speaker 35: the local municipalities and to look
02:30:15 Speaker 35: at upper-tier complementary programmemes. When that
02:30:17 Speaker 35: plan was written, we didn't have
02:30:20 Speaker 35: the ability at that point in
02:30:22 Speaker 35: time to have an efforts here
02:30:24 Speaker 35: CIP. Although there had been interim
02:30:25 Speaker 35: reports over the past couple of
02:30:28 Speaker 35: years that have contemplated that idea,
02:30:30 Speaker 35: we had been seeking some direction
02:30:32 Speaker 35: to reach out to the province
02:30:33 Speaker 35: to determine how to be prescribed
02:30:35 Speaker 35: for a CIP around the time
02:30:38 Speaker 35: that Bill sixty was enacted and
02:30:40 Speaker 35: we can put that permission in
02:30:42 Speaker 35: place, anyways. So you know, I
02:30:44 Speaker 35: think CIPs are. are nimble tools.
02:30:45 Speaker 35: We can tailor it the way
02:30:47 Speaker 35: that that would be helpful for
02:30:49 Speaker 35: us. But through that lens of
02:30:50 Speaker 35: of application to housing, I do
02:30:52 Speaker 35: think that a county CIP could
02:30:55 Speaker 35: really support that strategic targeting of
02:30:59 Speaker 35: incentives towards projects that we think
02:31:02 Speaker 35: are are needed to develop that
02:31:02 Speaker 35: more balanced housing mix. I think
02:31:04 Speaker 35: the market is definitely delivering the
02:31:06 Speaker 35: housing that the market can, but
02:31:08 Speaker 35: affordable housing in particular is very
02:31:12 Speaker 35: difficult. to pencil out, and not
02:31:14 Speaker 35: all creators of affordable housing have
02:31:16 Speaker 35: access to readily available capital or
02:31:19 Speaker 35: financial tools very early in their
02:31:22 Speaker 35: processes. And so, I think there
02:31:24 Speaker 35: could be some strategy around where
02:31:26 Speaker 35: we could place those incentives in
02:31:28 Speaker 35: the process to support those housing
02:31:32 Speaker 35: types we need. I think that
02:31:33 Speaker 35: CAP could create greater ease and
02:31:36 Speaker 35: flexibility as well for use of
02:31:39 Speaker 35: surplus municipal lands and partnerships around
02:31:40 Speaker 35: those lands. There are some provisions.
02:31:43 Speaker 35: within a CIP programme that you
02:31:44 Speaker 35: could create to allow for reduced
02:31:46 Speaker 35: cost transfers of lands, for example,
02:31:48 Speaker 35: or for projects. Could be looking
02:31:51 Speaker 35: again at targeting and filling those
02:31:53 Speaker 35: gaps in the other early funding
02:31:55 Speaker 35: opportunities to try and bring life
02:31:58 Speaker 35: to those projects that might otherwise
02:32:00 Speaker 35: struggle in the early phases. And
02:32:02 Speaker 35: then I think there is a
02:32:04 Speaker 35: great opportunity to to be looking
02:32:06 Speaker 35: at the at upper tier CIP
02:32:08 Speaker 35: in the context of there also
02:32:11 Speaker 35: being lower tier CIPs and. how
02:32:13 Speaker 35: does that work together, and how
02:32:15 Speaker 35: do we tailor the staffing around
02:32:20 Speaker 35: those CIP incentives? And so, I
02:32:21 Speaker 35: think there's a great opportunity to
02:32:22 Speaker 35: figure out how do we design
02:32:24 Speaker 35: that so that we can work
02:32:26 Speaker 35: together. So, we're bringing this forward
02:32:27 Speaker 35: not with a CIP prepared and
02:32:30 Speaker 35: ready to go, but suggesting that
02:32:32 Speaker 35: if if council would have an
02:32:33 Speaker 35: interest in pursuing an upper tier
02:32:36 Speaker 35: CIP, now might be an opportune
02:32:38 Speaker 35: time to. express that intent. We
02:32:39 Speaker 35: are undertaking the development charges background
02:32:41 Speaker 35: study, and so our thought was
02:32:44 Speaker 35: that if we were to receive
02:32:45 Speaker 35: endorsement to place this on the
02:32:48 Speaker 35: capital ten-year plan, we could be
02:32:50 Speaker 35: including some related costs within that
02:32:52 Speaker 35: development charges background study for funding
02:32:53 Speaker 35: at that future date when we
02:32:57 Speaker 35: pick up this project moving forward.
02:33:00 Speaker 35: We're anticipating, as well, from an
02:33:02 Speaker 35: alignment standpoint, that next year is
02:33:04 Speaker 35: likely the year that we'll be
02:33:06 Speaker 35: getting into an update to the.
02:33:07 Speaker 35: county official plan, and beginning that
02:33:09 Speaker 35: process, and so we'll also be
02:33:12 Speaker 35: getting census data next year as
02:33:14 Speaker 35: well. And so I think there's
02:33:16 Speaker 35: potentially some alignment to be looking
02:33:18 Speaker 35: at the policy framework, the updated
02:33:21 Speaker 35: data that might help us target
02:33:23 Speaker 35: that CIP and be thinking about
02:33:26 Speaker 35: where that CIP then ultimately goes
02:33:28 Speaker 35: in terms of design when we
02:33:29 Speaker 35: get there. So I have suggested
02:33:31 Speaker 35: within the report that I think
02:33:34 Speaker 35: there are some things that we
02:33:37 Speaker 35: do need to do in considering.
02:33:38 Speaker 35: a plan at the upper tier
02:33:41 Speaker 35: level, I've suggested that we phase
02:33:43 Speaker 35: this project in the following ways.
02:33:46 Speaker 35: So, first off, starting with some
02:33:49 Speaker 35: analysis of this background data, trends,
02:33:51 Speaker 35: needs, and gaps. The evaluation
02:33:54 Speaker 35: then of capacity considerations.
02:33:55 Speaker 35: So, who is delivering it at
02:33:59 Speaker 35: the county level? Staff resources. You
02:34:01 Speaker 35: know, all of the people that
02:34:03 Speaker 35: touch that. Making sure that that
02:34:05 Speaker 35: we're adequately resourced, and then the
02:34:07 Speaker 35: actual development. of the programme itself,
02:34:09 Speaker 35: right through to the delivery of
02:34:12 Speaker 35: that bylaw for implementation. And so,
02:34:14 Speaker 35: what we've suggested within the financial
02:34:15 Speaker 35: section of the report is that
02:34:17 Speaker 35: we would look at likely those
02:34:19 Speaker 35: items A and B being an
02:34:20 Speaker 35: in-house activity where staff is doing
02:34:21 Speaker 35: that investigation and targeting, and then
02:34:23 Speaker 35: potentially engaging some consulting resources to
02:34:25 Speaker 35: help with the actual programme design.
02:34:29 Speaker 35: There are CIPS across Ontario, and
02:34:31 Speaker 35: so our thought is that there
02:34:34 Speaker 35: may be some. opportunities to to
02:34:36 Speaker 35: glean from those consulting some of
02:34:39 Speaker 35: those examples we may haven't engaged
02:34:41 Speaker 35: with elsewhere, but also then being
02:34:42 Speaker 35: able to bring that in as
02:34:44 Speaker 35: a cost for some cost recovery
02:34:46 Speaker 35: through the development charges on a
02:34:50 Speaker 35: consulting basis. In designing the CIP,
02:34:52 Speaker 35: and again just a little foreshadowing
02:34:53 Speaker 36: of where we think we might
02:35:00 Speaker 36: go if council were on board,
02:35:06 Speaker 36: you know we would really want
02:35:09 Speaker 37: to be considering those types of
02:35:12 Speaker 37: projects and organisations that. could be
02:35:14 Speaker 13: incented through that programme, we would
02:35:17 Speaker 13: want to use data informed approaches
02:35:21 Speaker 13: because I think resources are limited
02:35:25 Speaker 13: all around, and so we'd want
02:35:30 Speaker 13: to be putting those incentives towards
02:35:33 Speaker 13: the specific projects that need that
02:35:34 Speaker 13: help. We'd want to direct the
02:35:37 Speaker 13: incentives towards the most impactful stage
02:35:39 Speaker 13: of development, and then look at
02:35:44 Speaker 13: scaling of those incentives. So, you
02:35:45 Speaker 13: know, I think the juice needs
02:35:48 Speaker 13: to be worth the squeeze for
02:35:51 Speaker 35: those development proponents. So, you know,
02:35:54 Speaker 35: if it's a matching fund grant,
02:35:57 Speaker 35: capping out at you know seven
02:35:59 Speaker 35: thousand dollars on a forty million
02:36:01 Speaker 35: dollar housing project, that's a very
02:36:03 Speaker 35: small drop in the bucket. But
02:36:06 Speaker 35: if we were able to offer
02:36:07 Speaker 35: a slightly more meaningful incentive at
02:36:09 Speaker 35: a key stage where there aren't
02:36:10 Speaker 35: other resources, we see you
02:36:13 Speaker 35: know being able to match the
02:36:16 Speaker 35: scale with that usability or or
02:36:19 Speaker 35: interest by the developers to take
02:36:22 Speaker 35: that. And then again, looking at
02:36:24 Speaker 35: that alignment with the. local CIPs,
02:36:27 Speaker 35: so I just wanted to mention
02:36:28 Speaker 35: here that we have had various
02:36:30 Speaker 35: discussions with local staff, and so
02:36:32 Speaker 35: we'd had a chat with UDOs
02:36:35 Speaker 35: earlier in the year, and I
02:36:37 Speaker 35: guess my takeaway from that was
02:36:38 Speaker 35: each of our municipalities is very
02:36:40 Speaker 35: differently resourced with capacity to deliver
02:36:41 Speaker 35: the CIPs, and so those types
02:36:43 Speaker 35: of initiatives that have agreements or
02:36:45 Speaker 35: monitoring conditions over time, like affordability
02:36:47 Speaker 35: conditions, that. Affordability conditions—that type of
02:36:49 Speaker 35: thing—may be challenging to accommodate in
02:36:50 Speaker 35: that local resourcing. So again, there
02:36:53 Speaker 35: might be that opportunity to explore,
02:36:54 Speaker 35: you know, what tools are sitting
02:36:57 Speaker 35: in a county CIP versus the
02:36:59 Speaker 35: local. How are those working together?
02:37:01 Speaker 35: Maybe the the county is, you
02:37:03 Speaker 35: know, biting off a bigger chunk
02:37:05 Speaker 35: with those affordable housing ones, which
02:37:07 Speaker 35: allows the locals to focus a
02:37:08 Speaker 35: little more on FDEV or those
02:37:09 Speaker 35: types of initiatives. So just to
02:37:11 Speaker 35: say that I think there's a
02:37:13 Speaker 35: conversation there that we could explore.
02:37:17 Speaker 35: That we explore around, you know,
02:37:19 Speaker 35: how we want to align those
02:37:21 Speaker 35: those IPs. So just back to
02:37:23 Speaker 35: the beginning, the staff recommendation. So
02:37:25 Speaker 35: as noted, we provided a report
02:37:31 Speaker 35: that outlines all of this information,
02:37:34 Speaker 35: and our staff recommendation would be
02:37:36 Speaker 35: that we would proceed to put
02:37:40 Speaker 35: this on the capital plan and
02:37:43 Speaker 35: into development charges. Background study, it's
02:37:46 Speaker 22: not just brief. There, thank you.
02:37:47 Speaker 22: Thank you. So with that, I
02:37:50 Speaker 22: will look to committee. the whole
02:37:52 Speaker 22: members for questions or comments. Councillor
02:37:54 Speaker 22: Dobrin, thank you, Warden, and thank
02:37:55 Speaker 22: you, Liz. I read this with
02:37:58 Speaker 22: great interest, and I know that
02:37:59 Speaker 22: at previously the county was looking
02:38:03 Speaker 22: at doing a land inventory to
02:38:05 Speaker 22: see which lands might be available
02:38:07 Speaker 22: for. affordable housing development that we
02:38:08 Speaker 22: could partner with other organisations. Would
02:38:10 Speaker 22: that land inventory play a role
02:38:14 Speaker 22: in this community improvement plan, as
02:38:15 Speaker 22: opposed to a financial incentive? There
02:38:16 Speaker 22: would be that that transfer of
02:38:19 Speaker 22: land or land lease or that
02:38:21 Speaker 22: type of thing. Thank you, and
02:38:24 Speaker 22: through to you, Madam Warden. Yes,
02:38:27 Speaker 22: so you know, I think. there
02:38:28 Speaker 22: are some interesting rules around municipal
02:38:29 Speaker 22: lands and associated marketing, and so
02:38:30 Speaker 22: you have to be of the
02:38:31 Speaker 22: same organisation to be able to
02:38:32 Speaker 22: do marketing for lands within your
02:38:35 Speaker 22: municipal ownership. So there's some some
02:38:36 Speaker 22: legislative rules around that, and so
02:38:38 Speaker 22: I think one of the ways
02:38:41 Speaker 22: that a CIP can can assist
02:38:41 Speaker 22: is where you do have those
02:38:43 Speaker 22: surplus lands inventoryed as as potential
02:38:44 Speaker 22: opportunities for affordable housing. Sorry about
02:38:45 Speaker 22: that. If we did. get a
02:38:50 Speaker 22: proposal come in where you know
02:38:50 Speaker 22: somebody wanted to to uptake one
02:38:52 Speaker 22: of those surplus properties under the
02:38:53 Speaker 22: Municipal Act, you'd normally be dealing
02:38:54 Speaker 22: with a kind of market rate
02:38:56 Speaker 22: or for those lands or or
02:38:58 Speaker 22: an appraised value. Under a CIP,
02:38:59 Speaker 22: where you're looking at community-based objectives
02:39:02 Speaker 22: that you're trying to achieve, and
02:39:04 Speaker 35: you can place conditions and agreements
02:39:06 Speaker 35: around that, you may be able
02:39:09 Speaker 35: to transfer those lands at a
02:39:12 Speaker 35: low market rate. So as part
02:39:13 Speaker 35: of a portfolio, a Part of
02:39:15 Speaker 35: a portfolio of a partnership or
02:39:17 Speaker 35: or an agreement in that way.
02:39:20 Speaker 35: So I think those two tools
02:39:22 Speaker 35: work really well together, hand in
02:39:23 Speaker 35: hand. And as well, there are
02:39:24 Speaker 35: some provisions that allow for transfer
02:39:26 Speaker 35: between organisations as well. So, you
02:39:28 Speaker 35: know, if a local municipality, for
02:39:32 Speaker 35: example, was partnering with the county,
02:39:33 Speaker 35: you know, could we transfer those
02:39:35 Speaker 35: lands and deal with them at
02:39:37 Speaker 35: below market rate? We would both
02:39:39 Speaker 35: then have the ability to kind
02:39:40 Speaker 35: of play in that same sandbox.
02:39:42 Speaker 18: Whereas right now, the county is
02:39:44 Speaker 18: limited in that regard. whereas the
02:39:45 Speaker 18: CIP power fits with the local
02:39:48 Speaker 18: municipalities in dealing with those lands
02:39:50 Speaker 18: that way. So, yes, and I
02:39:52 Speaker 18: think big opportunity to explore that
02:39:53 Speaker 18: even further. Thank you. Okay, anything
02:39:56 Speaker 18: else, Councillor Nielsen? Thank you very
02:39:57 Speaker 18: much, Ward and Matrosov. I'm just
02:40:00 Speaker 18: trying to wrap my head around
02:40:01 Speaker 18: the DC combination. So, the report
02:40:02 Speaker 18: is suggesting that. if we incorporate
02:40:04 Speaker 18: the county CIP into the DC
02:40:07 Speaker 18: study, we can use DC study
02:40:08 Speaker 18: funds—sorry, DC funds—to fund the study
02:40:12 Speaker 18: to build and implement the CIP,
02:40:13 Speaker 18: but not actually fund the CIP
02:40:15 Speaker 18: once it's constructed. I guess I
02:40:17 Speaker 18: have two questions, kind of on
02:40:20 Speaker 18: how that might work. One is
02:40:21 Speaker 18: what the possible impact is into
02:40:24 Speaker 18: the DC charges itself, as in,
02:40:27 Speaker 18: like, how much are we thinking
02:40:30 Speaker 18: it's going to cost to build
02:40:32 Speaker 18: the study out, and two would
02:40:35 Speaker 18: be with I don't know if
02:40:37 Speaker 18: it's kind of died down, but
02:40:40 Speaker 18: there's still the provincial and federal
02:40:42 Speaker 18: comments around development charges and and
02:40:44 Speaker 18: just wondering if there's concern about
02:40:45 Speaker 18: we're trying to add extra studies
02:40:47 Speaker 18: into development charges while at the
02:40:49 Speaker 18: same time the province and the
02:40:52 Speaker 18: feds are really trying to say
02:40:54 Speaker 18: you shouldn't have development charges or
02:40:56 Speaker 18: you should limit them. And I'm
02:40:56 Speaker 18: just trying to understand that correlation
02:40:58 Speaker 18: and just how this might work
02:41:01 Speaker 18: for the CIP, where like I
02:41:04 Speaker 18: fully support the concept of using
02:41:06 Speaker 18: the CIP. building it out, and
02:41:09 Speaker 18: funding it so we can support
02:41:12 Speaker 18: affordable housing, but it's kind of
02:41:13 Speaker 18: tricky to me in just how
02:41:16 Speaker 18: we're using that through development charges
02:41:18 Speaker 18: portion. And through you, and so
02:41:20 Speaker 18: I think I may bite off
02:41:22 Speaker 18: the first chunk of that, and
02:41:23 Speaker 18: then I might look back to
02:41:25 Speaker 18: Scott to take it in on
02:41:27 Speaker 18: on that as well. So, in
02:41:28 Speaker 18: terms of impact to DCs, so
02:41:30 Speaker 18: I think what we've identified within
02:41:35 Speaker 18: the report was you're marking about
02:41:38 Speaker 18: fifty thousand dollars for that kind
02:41:39 Speaker 18: of part C and D of
02:41:43 Speaker 18: of the work plan. it's a
02:41:47 Speaker 18: ballpark, right? We're we're trying to
02:41:49 Speaker 33: kind of get a good sense
02:41:52 Speaker 33: of of where we might land
02:41:53 Speaker 33: for a consultant to to engage
02:41:55 Speaker 33: with us. So, fifty thousand dollars
02:41:58 Speaker 33: is fifty thousand dollars, right? It
02:42:02 Speaker 33: may have an impact, but I
02:42:08 Speaker 33: just to give you a good
02:42:11 Speaker 33: idea of scale. And then I'll
02:42:12 Speaker 33: turn my mic off and and
02:42:15 Speaker 33: pass it over to Director. Yeah,
02:42:19 Speaker 33: thanks, Liz, and and through Madam
02:42:21 Speaker 33: Warden to Councillor Nielsen. So we
02:42:24 Speaker 33: are working with Hemson right now
02:42:27 Speaker 33: on our development charges. Right now,
02:42:28 Speaker 33: on our development charge background study,
02:42:31 Speaker 33: and and because the county has
02:42:32 Speaker 33: never had the ability to do
02:42:35 Speaker 33: a CAP before, as said until
02:42:36 Speaker 33: Bill sixty, you know, one of
02:42:39 Speaker 33: the first questions early on was,
02:42:41 Speaker 33: is this something that that that
02:42:43 Speaker 33: we could charge DCs for? And
02:42:46 Speaker 33: what Hemson shared in that regard
02:42:49 Speaker 33: is, is a portion of it
02:42:51 Speaker 33: would be DC eligible. With any
02:42:56 Speaker 33: development charge, you need to look
02:42:58 Speaker 33: at what is the growth related
02:43:00 Speaker 33: aspect of that. So so it
02:43:03 Speaker 33: might not be the entire fifty
02:43:05 Speaker 33: thousand, but but we could we
02:43:08 Speaker 33: could work with Hemson to establish.
02:43:09 Speaker 33: Work with Hempton to establish that
02:43:11 Speaker 33: calculation. But when you're doing your
02:43:13 Speaker 33: development charges background study, simply put,
02:43:16 Speaker 33: it's it's not a wish list,
02:43:19 Speaker 33: and and it's definitely not a
02:43:22 Speaker 33: staff wish list. There has to
02:43:26 Speaker 33: be intent through previous master plans,
02:43:28 Speaker 33: or capital budgets, or capital plans
02:43:30 Speaker 33: in that regard that council has
02:43:32 Speaker 33: endorsed before we can even consider
02:43:34 Speaker 33: it in in the the background
02:43:35 Speaker 33: study. And that background study is
02:43:37 Speaker 33: is sort of the complex analysis
02:43:40 Speaker 33: you go through to to provide.
02:43:42 Speaker 33: in this case the future council
02:43:44 Speaker 33: the information of of what the
02:43:46 Speaker 33: county development charges would be starting
02:43:47 Speaker 33: in in you know later in
02:43:48 Speaker 33: twenty seven and and beyond kind
02:43:51 Speaker 33: of thing and council has the
02:43:53 Speaker 33: option of of adopting a bylaw
02:43:54 Speaker 33: with those charges or going with
02:43:56 Speaker 33: lesser charges so if council were
02:43:57 Speaker 33: to support this recommendation today essentially
02:44:01 Speaker 33: what it would allow staff to
02:44:03 Speaker 33: do is to go back to
02:44:05 Speaker 33: Hemson and said yes council is
02:44:08 Speaker 33: is interested in a development charges
02:44:12 Speaker 33: in a upper tier community improvement
02:44:14 Speaker 33: plan, we would include a portion
02:44:16 Speaker 33: of that cost of the fifty
02:44:18 Speaker 33: thousand in the background study, and
02:44:20 Speaker 33: and then that background study would
02:44:25 Speaker 33: ultimately come back to to council
02:44:28 Speaker 33: for for their approval. The project
02:44:33 Speaker 33: would have to be added in
02:44:36 Speaker 33: future years' capital budgets as well.
02:44:40 Speaker 33: So you know, although this is
02:44:42 Speaker 33: an early preview to council, this
02:44:45 Speaker 33: isn't sort of council committing a
02:44:48 Speaker 35: hundred percent. There still be that
02:44:50 Speaker 35: opportunity to reassess down the road.
02:44:51 Speaker 35: Sorry for the long winded answer.
02:44:53 Speaker 35: The long-winded answer. Excellent, good teamwork.
02:44:56 Speaker 35: We'll go to Councillor Greg. I
02:44:58 Speaker 35: guess I just need a little
02:45:00 Speaker 35: bit more clarity, Liz, on where
02:45:01 Speaker 35: we're at. The report does state
02:45:04 Speaker 35: maintain, and there's an enhancement component
02:45:07 Speaker 35: in the same sentence. I just
02:45:10 Speaker 35: heard in the past the county
02:45:12 Speaker 35: was not in the position to
02:45:13 Speaker 35: do CIP programme, but the report
02:45:17 Speaker 35: clearly states maintain. So, have we
02:45:19 Speaker 35: been in there? I'm concerned with
02:45:20 Speaker 35: it's very simple, fifty thousand dollars.
02:45:22 Speaker 35: But as a project within the
02:45:24 Speaker 35: ten-year capital budget, what does this
02:45:26 Speaker 35: morph to? I find there is
02:45:28 Speaker 35: somewhat of a lack of clarity.
02:45:32 Speaker 35: It's a little bit dreamy. The
02:45:34 Speaker 35: aspirations, whereas engineering services could say,
02:45:35 Speaker 35: if you don't invest in that
02:45:38 Speaker 35: bridge. it's going to collapse. Or
02:45:39 Speaker 35: housing is, if you don't
02:45:41 Speaker 35: fix that elevator, your senior residences
02:45:43 Speaker 35: are walking up four flights of
02:45:45 Speaker 35: stairs, and you don't want that.
02:45:46 Speaker 35: I'm not sure where this is
02:45:48 Speaker 35: going. And as long as we're
02:45:50 Speaker 35: delivering four, five, six, seven plus
02:45:52 Speaker 35: two, two point five percent in
02:45:55 Speaker 35: growth every year in tax increases,
02:45:59 Speaker 35: I heard you say it. Resources
02:46:01 Speaker 35: are limited, but if we're delivering.
02:46:03 Speaker 35: five, six, seven plus growth every
02:46:06 Speaker 35: year, we're not acknowledging that resources
02:46:10 Speaker 35: are limited for people. That's those
02:46:11 Speaker 35: are tax increases that are not
02:46:13 Speaker 35: sustainable, and that's where we've been
02:46:16 Speaker 35: at, and that's where we're currently
02:46:18 Speaker 35: projecting ourselves. So I'd like to
02:46:20 Speaker 35: hear more clarity, I guess, on
02:46:22 Speaker 35: what is the vision here, because
02:46:25 Speaker 35: I the report right now, I'm
02:46:27 Speaker 35: concerned with we can't afford a.
02:46:29 Speaker 35: grandiose vision that's not coming through
02:46:30 Speaker 35: in in the pages here yet.
02:46:33 Speaker 35: I also we do a I
02:46:35 Speaker 35: think as lower tier municipalities where
02:46:37 Speaker 35: we have them, some of the
02:46:38 Speaker 35: CIP programmemes are very good. There's
02:46:42 Speaker 35: some great initiatives in there. Flip
02:46:45 Speaker 35: side of that is some of
02:46:47 Speaker 35: them almost are window dressing. Perhaps
02:46:48 Speaker 35: on Main Street, and then somebody
02:46:50 Speaker 35: can buy the building and they
02:46:51 Speaker 35: have a new vision and they
02:46:52 Speaker 35: rip out the taxpayer funded investment
02:46:55 Speaker 35: that just took place a couple
02:46:58 Speaker 35: years prior under new ownership. and
02:47:00 Speaker 35: it's not a lot different than
02:47:02 Speaker 35: some of the the reference that
02:47:04 Speaker 35: was in a report that we
02:47:06 Speaker 35: approved regarding a forest clearing portion
02:47:08 Speaker 35: of land where it was funded
02:47:11 Speaker 35: by taxpayers in previous years, and
02:47:13 Speaker 35: we just approved wiping that out.
02:47:17 Speaker 35: That's a concern. How do we
02:47:19 Speaker 35: protect that? I feel like a
02:47:21 Speaker 35: lot of CIP is perhaps best
02:47:24 Speaker 35: delivered at the local municipal level,
02:47:28 Speaker 35: and I have a lot of
02:47:30 Speaker 35: trepidation. that we are walking into
02:47:31 Speaker 35: this at the at the county
02:47:34 Speaker 35: level. Thank you. There's a lot
02:47:37 Speaker 35: there. So maintain. I'll just I'll
02:47:39 Speaker 35: start there. So you know I
02:47:40 Speaker 35: think when the housing action plan
02:47:43 Speaker 35: was was first developed, we were
02:47:46 Speaker 35: aware that some upper tiers had
02:47:47 Speaker 35: CIPs, but we knew that it
02:47:49 Speaker 35: would. be a process if we
02:47:51 Speaker 35: were interested to kind of have
02:47:54 Speaker 35: explore that tool for ourselves. So
02:47:57 Speaker 35: I think the the way that
02:48:00 Speaker 35: the Housing Action Plan addresses that
02:48:03 Speaker 35: is, you know, we talked about
02:48:05 Speaker 35: maintaining and and supporting that ongoing
02:48:07 Speaker 35: CIP programme, so administratively delivered at
02:48:10 Speaker 35: the county level, and actioned through
02:48:11 Speaker 35: the local CIP bylaws because that's
02:48:12 Speaker 35: the tools that we had available
02:48:14 Speaker 35: to us to deliver that portfolio.
02:48:16 Speaker 35: With Bill sixty, that changes. and
02:48:18 Speaker 35: now we do have the ability
02:48:20 Speaker 35: to have that tool. So, you
02:48:21 Speaker 35: know, I think there was general
02:48:24 Speaker 35: commentary in the Housing Action Plan
02:48:26 Speaker 35: around the complementary incentives and finances
02:48:28 Speaker 35: to offer support and and maintain
02:48:31 Speaker 35: that CIP programme. So, I have,
02:48:33 Speaker 35: you're right, I've taken some licence
02:48:33 Speaker 35: to say that we've talked about
02:48:35 Speaker 35: the CIP in the Housing Action
02:48:36 Speaker 35: Plan around maintaining and enhancing and
02:48:38 Speaker 35: delivering complementary incentives. I've made the
02:48:40 Speaker 35: logical jump to say that, and
02:48:43 Speaker 35: now that CIP tool is available
02:48:44 Speaker 35: at the county level, but that.
02:48:47 Speaker 35: About the county level, but that
02:48:49 Speaker 35: it's under that portfolio. But when
02:48:51 Speaker 35: I brought the housing action plan
02:48:53 Speaker 35: update report last November, there had
02:48:55 Speaker 35: been some commentary in there around
02:48:56 Speaker 35: that there was a draft of
02:48:58 Speaker 35: that that legislation, and that we
02:48:59 Speaker 35: thought that that tool would
02:49:02 Speaker 35: become available. Excuse me. Initially, saw
02:49:04 Speaker 35: some direction to explore that process
02:49:09 Speaker 35: to get the CIP. So, you
02:49:10 Speaker 35: know, I think all of that
02:49:13 Speaker 35: is natural evolution of of what.
02:49:14 Speaker 38: was identified in the CIP and
02:49:15 Speaker 38: through subsequent discussions with them as
02:49:17 Speaker 38: well around pursuing that potential tool,
02:49:19 Speaker 38: but I think that you know
02:49:21 Speaker 38: you're right. Resourcing is limited, so
02:49:23 Speaker 38: you know the sky doesn't fall
02:49:25 Speaker 38: if we don't have a CIP,
02:49:26 Speaker 18: but I think it's about what
02:49:28 Speaker 18: it could be used for, and
02:49:29 Speaker 18: so I struggle to stand here
02:49:31 Speaker 18: and give you the whole vision
02:49:33 Speaker 18: because it is big. I have
02:49:36 Speaker 18: been working on reporting. around kind
02:49:38 Speaker 18: of bigger vision, but I guess
02:49:39 Speaker 18: what I would say is, you
02:49:42 Speaker 18: know, through the Housing Action Plan
02:49:44 Speaker 18: and all of the learning that
02:49:46 Speaker 18: we've been doing around capacity building
02:49:49 Speaker 18: for affordable housing and non-profit developers,
02:49:50 Speaker 18: what we really heard back is
02:49:53 Speaker 18: that different developers do different types
02:49:54 Speaker 18: of housing, and they have access
02:49:57 Speaker 18: to different tools. They have access
02:49:59 Speaker 18: to different financial tools. They're resourced
02:50:02 Speaker 18: very differently in terms of their
02:50:03 Speaker 18: capital readiness, and the market is—it's
02:50:04 Speaker 18: not market developers. It's not market
02:50:07 Speaker 18: developers that are creating the affordable,
02:50:09 Speaker 18: deeply affordable housing, and so you
02:50:11 Speaker 18: know I see this as an
02:50:12 Speaker 18: opportunity for us to be really
02:50:15 Speaker 18: noodling in on like exactly where
02:50:16 Speaker 18: are those barriers to our nonprofits
02:50:19 Speaker 18: at the scale that we have
02:50:20 Speaker 18: in our local area engaging around
02:50:23 Speaker 18: a surplus land offering or a
02:50:26 Speaker 18: project, even in partnership, to try
02:50:28 Speaker 18: and get an affordable component of
02:50:30 Speaker 18: the units in, because. It's
02:50:31 Speaker 18: in because different types of developers
02:50:33 Speaker 18: do different types of projects. So,
02:50:36 Speaker 18: you know, when you pull all
02:50:37 Speaker 18: that together, what we hear is
02:50:39 Speaker 18: that the barriers are early access
02:50:41 Speaker 18: to capital in the ideation and
02:50:47 Speaker 18: the site preparation stages of development,
02:50:51 Speaker 18: and there aren't great seed funding
02:50:54 Speaker 18: grants available now. There, the the
02:50:55 Speaker 18: federal programme has changed significantly and
02:50:58 Speaker 33: is really available at the later
02:51:00 Speaker 33: stages of a fully cooked project,
02:51:02 Speaker 33: and so. you know, I think
02:51:04 Speaker 33: we're just trying to figure out
02:51:05 Speaker 33: that piece of how do we
02:51:10 Speaker 33: get those right tools at the
02:51:13 Speaker 33: right stage for the right players
02:51:16 Speaker 33: to make that happen. And it's
02:51:18 Speaker 33: in the weeds, and it's very
02:51:21 Speaker 33: niche. But I think if the
02:51:23 Speaker 33: market could create the affordable housing
02:51:26 Speaker 33: that we need without incentives, we
02:51:27 Speaker 33: would have it. So I really
02:51:31 Speaker 33: put this forward as as a
02:51:33 Speaker 33: tool that I think would be
02:51:36 Speaker 33: very helpful to us. But I
02:51:39 Speaker 33: think there are a number of
02:51:41 Speaker 33: stages ahead, right? Like, I think
02:51:42 Speaker 33: we. would be reporting back to
02:51:45 Speaker 33: council on that A and B
02:51:48 Speaker 33: activities before we ever get to
02:51:50 Speaker 33: the consulting to do the sequencing.
02:51:51 Speaker 33: At that future stage, I think
02:51:55 Speaker 33: that we could develop a CIP
02:51:58 Speaker 33: programme and then decide budgetarily. We're
02:52:01 Speaker 33: not ready to implement it this
02:52:03 Speaker 33: year. We'll earmark the money for
02:52:05 Speaker 33: next year. So there there will
02:52:08 Speaker 33: be lots of decision points. I
02:52:09 Speaker 33: think for those further targeting and
02:52:10 Speaker 22: resourcing discussions to happen. So I'll
02:52:11 Speaker 22: leave it there. But happy to
02:52:15 Speaker 22: to continue. Chicken soup. Okay, and
02:52:18 Speaker 22: we'll go to Director Taylor for
02:52:20 Speaker 22: follow up. Thank you, Madam Moore.
02:52:22 Speaker 22: And I think just very briefly
02:52:23 Speaker 22: to build on what Liz said,
02:52:26 Speaker 22: any CIP, whether municipal or or
02:52:27 Speaker 22: upper tier, acts as as sort
02:52:29 Speaker 22: of a menu of incentives, and
02:52:30 Speaker 22: and any given council can choose,
02:52:32 Speaker 22: you know, which which items they
02:52:33 Speaker 22: want to put on the menu
02:52:35 Speaker 22: versus which are too extravagant and
02:52:38 Speaker 22: wouldn't fit the menu. And and
02:52:40 Speaker 22: so in this case, the county's
02:52:41 Speaker 22: menu we can offer is pretty
02:52:42 Speaker 22: much related to affordable housing, and
02:52:44 Speaker 22: and. so while as municipalities you
02:52:46 Speaker 22: all have broad menus and you
02:52:47 Speaker 22: can do things like brownfields or
02:52:48 Speaker 22: downtown you know facade improvements and
02:52:50 Speaker 22: everything else we would have to
02:52:55 Speaker 22: be very very targeted legislatively to
02:52:56 Speaker 22: to a lot of what Liz
02:53:00 Speaker 22: is describing with respect to to
02:53:04 Speaker 22: the housing and and so she's
02:53:05 Speaker 22: completely right you know this is
02:53:06 Speaker 22: somewhat aspirational because we were only
02:53:08 Speaker 22: given this legislative ability late last
02:53:10 Speaker 22: year we don't have a lot
02:53:12 Speaker 35: to go from just yet in
02:53:13 Speaker 35: terms of you know. there's not
02:53:14 Speaker 35: 30 other municipalities with an affordable
02:53:16 Speaker 35: housing CIP in in the province.
02:53:18 Speaker 35: So we we would need to
02:53:19 Speaker 35: do some further work. We would
02:53:21 Speaker 35: need to report back to council
02:53:23 Speaker 35: and and at some point need
02:53:25 Speaker 35: to further flesh out you know
02:53:30 Speaker 35: what what funding a CIP could
02:53:32 Speaker 35: look like. So this is very
02:53:33 Speaker 35: early stages, but certainly respect the
02:53:35 Speaker 35: pressures that that both you as
02:53:37 Speaker 35: as county councillors and municipal
02:53:40 Speaker 35: councillors are under with all the
02:53:43 Speaker 35: other things that are legislatively required
02:53:46 Speaker 35: and so. Legislatively required, and as
02:53:48 Speaker 35: Liz said, this isn't legislatively required.
02:53:51 Speaker 35: We do think it could be
02:53:52 Speaker 35: a useful tool to to help
02:53:54 Speaker 35: laser in on on some of
02:53:57 Speaker 35: those housing incentives that might be
02:54:01 Speaker 35: useful. Follow up. Thank you. And
02:54:04 Speaker 35: you mentioned some upper tier levels
02:54:06 Speaker 35: of government have some initiatives already
02:54:07 Speaker 33: in place. It might be I
02:54:10 Speaker 33: would enjoy seeing some examples in
02:54:12 Speaker 33: the report. So perhaps that's something
02:54:13 Speaker 33: that can be. emailed out to
02:54:15 Speaker 33: council. Just some references where we
02:54:22 Speaker 33: can access some of those resources,
02:54:24 Speaker 33: because certainly point two moves this
02:54:26 Speaker 33: forward. So when it becomes a
02:54:26 Speaker 33: budget discussion, the council of whomever
02:54:28 Speaker 33: is sitting there has a little
02:54:31 Speaker 33: bit more background to be able
02:54:32 Speaker 33: to see what types of initiatives
02:54:36 Speaker 35: have been in place and then
02:54:37 Speaker 35: evaluate on that, as opposed to
02:54:39 Speaker 35: here's your. budget. What do you
02:54:41 Speaker 35: think? Then your the the council
02:54:47 Speaker 35: is more informed. I guess I'll
02:54:50 Speaker 35: leave it there. I it's good
02:54:51 Speaker 35: to support, but I don't think
02:54:53 Speaker 35: we want to get into the
02:54:56 Speaker 35: banking business. It's good to work
02:54:58 Speaker 15: with banking, but our role is
02:55:07 Speaker 15: not to get too deep within
02:55:09 Speaker 15: the banking industry. I think in
02:55:11 Speaker 15: terms of funding some endeavors. Some.
02:55:13 Speaker 15: Okay. Thank you. We'll go to
02:55:16 Speaker 15: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you again, Ward
02:55:17 Speaker 15: Matrasoff, and I think Councillor Greg
02:55:18 Speaker 15: stirred some questions in my own
03:38:31 Speaker 15: mind. Currently, the county, as part
03:38:33 Speaker 15: of our budget, puts money into
03:38:34 Speaker 03: affordable housing every year, but we
03:38:36 Speaker 15: have rules and restrictions to how
03:38:38 Speaker 15: we can support nonprofits and groups
03:38:41 Speaker 15: and organisations with that. So, you
03:38:42 Speaker 15: know, hearing Councillor Greg's first question
03:38:44 Speaker 15: is really about what is that
03:38:46 Speaker 15: financial impact to a budget line
03:38:48 Speaker 15: later. The CIP might, moreover, just
03:38:51 Speaker 15: allow us. to have different rules
03:38:56 Speaker 15: that allow us to utilise the
03:38:58 Speaker 15: funding we're already putting away. We
03:39:00 Speaker 15: know that six hundred thousand dollars
03:39:02 Speaker 15: a year isn't going to buy
03:39:04 Speaker 15: us one unit in affordable housing
03:39:07 Speaker 15: for the county, but six hundred
03:39:10 Speaker 15: thousand dollars can help support the
03:39:12 Speaker 15: acquisition of land for a nonprofit
03:39:14 Speaker 15: that could then turn it around.
03:39:16 Speaker 15: And currently, the rules are we
03:39:19 Speaker 15: can't do that. But utilising a
03:39:23 Speaker 15: CIP, we might be able to
03:39:24 Speaker 15: find an avenue to which we
03:39:26 Speaker 15: can support a nonprofit utilising the
03:39:28 Speaker 15: funds we are currently have. There's
03:39:29 Speaker 15: a question. in there. Thank you
03:39:32 Speaker 15: very much. It went up at
03:39:34 Speaker 15: the end. Yes, so I think
03:39:35 Speaker 15: I think it does. It would
03:39:40 Speaker 15: it would allow us to act
03:39:46 Speaker 15: more nimbly potentially with the dollars
03:39:48 Speaker 15: we have, and and I haven't
03:39:51 Speaker 15: had the conversation with Anne Marie
03:39:54 Speaker 15: in detail yet, and I did
03:39:55 Speaker 15: not want to speak to you
03:39:56 Speaker 39: know that levy fund and and
03:39:57 Speaker 39: seeking any claim to it, but
03:39:59 Speaker 39: I I do think you know
03:40:02 Speaker 39: we have those dollars. We're able
03:40:03 Speaker 39: to award them through partnership or
03:40:06 Speaker 39: flow through agreement. Partnership or flow
03:40:07 Speaker 39: through agreements or a capital facilities
03:40:10 Speaker 39: bylaw, but a CIP is is
03:40:12 Speaker 39: a much more flexible tool to
03:40:14 Speaker 39: be able to do that. And
03:40:18 Speaker 39: particularly, we have been working through
03:40:20 Speaker 39: evaluation of a few of our
03:40:22 Speaker 39: county properties, considering potential housing use
03:40:25 Speaker 39: and surplus opportunities. So again, just
03:40:26 Speaker 39: for partnership facilitation as well, to
03:40:28 Speaker 39: be able to to be incenting
03:40:30 Speaker 39: or waiving certain things at the
03:40:32 Speaker 39: county level, which. we don't have
03:40:34 Speaker 39: the ability to do right now
03:40:36 Speaker 39: through those agreements, so yes, enabling.
03:40:37 Speaker 39: Thank you. Okay. Anything further, Councillor
03:40:39 Speaker 39: Gray? That just triggered a thought.
03:40:40 Speaker 39: Is there a mechanism here where,
03:40:43 Speaker 39: if somebody wants to construct a
03:40:46 Speaker 39: nine thousand square foot home, you
03:40:49 Speaker 39: could place like a CIP tax
03:40:50 Speaker 39: on it and then put it
03:40:51 Speaker 39: into a reserve for redistribution into
03:40:53 Speaker 39: affordable housing? I mean, I'd like
03:40:56 Speaker 39: for your heads. I see Scott
03:40:58 Speaker 39: was reaching for his button there,
03:40:59 Speaker 39: so I don't know if you
03:41:01 Speaker 39: had a response in mind, but
03:41:05 Speaker 39: I'm not aware of that programme.
03:41:07 Speaker 39: But I'll pass along to Dr.
03:41:08 Speaker 39: Taylor. Okay. Yeah, ditto. I'm not
03:41:10 Speaker 39: aware of any legislative authority. It's
03:41:12 Speaker 39: something we could look into further
03:41:17 Speaker 39: with with legal services staff, but
03:41:18 Speaker 39: I'm not aware of anything there.
03:41:20 Speaker 39: Okay. Anything further? All right then,
03:41:23 Speaker 39: I'll call the question. All those
03:41:24 Speaker 39: in favour, and that motion is
03:41:25 Speaker 39: carried. Thank you very much, Planner
03:41:26 Speaker 39: Buckton. And we will be breaking
03:41:32 Speaker 39: for lunch now, and coming back
03:41:36 Speaker 40: at. Okay. Okay. So if I
03:41:39 Speaker 40: could call everybody back at 1:25,
03:41:41 Speaker 40: then we will carry on with
03:41:44 Speaker 40: the remainder of the item sevens,
03:41:47 Speaker 09: the two that were pulled from
03:41:49 Speaker 09: six, and then we do. Hold
03:41:50 Speaker 09: from six, and then we do
03:41:53 Speaker 09: have closed session as well. Thank
03:41:56 Speaker 09: you. Okay. thank you very much,
03:42:00 Speaker 09: everyone. We do have a quorum
03:42:06 Speaker 09: here around the table, and we
03:42:09 Speaker 09: are going to be continuing with
03:42:11 Speaker 09: item 7G. And with that, once
03:42:13 Speaker 09: we get it moved on the
03:42:14 Speaker 09: floor, we will then look to
03:42:16 Speaker 09: our interim director of finance and
03:42:25 Speaker 09: treasurer Murray to come and provide
03:42:27 Speaker 09: an introduction. So it's recommended that
7.g FR-CW-19-26 Heath Care Funding Request 2027 Budget
Council considered a motion to include a $175,000 request from Sogin Hospice Inc. for building a hospice in Gray County within the 2027 budget, funded over five years at $35,000 annually from the healthcare reserve without adding to the levy. Councillor Warder opposed the motion on principle, arguing healthcare is a provincial responsibility and taxpayers should not fund it indefinitely, while Councillor McLean supported the initiative as essential end-of-life care despite fiscal concerns regarding the province's delivery of services. Other councillors debated the policy requiring 20% residency for funded organisations and questioned past county contributions to Chapman House, with some advocating for continued local support while others called for scrutiny of long-term financial commitments. Council also considered a motion to approve an updated land acquisition and disposition policy that consolidates three separate documents into one. The new policy introduces a staff valuation method for land under $75,000 and increases compensation amounts in Schedule A to reflect current market conditions for road purposes. Additionally, the requirement for newspaper publication was removed from notice sections due to declining circulation and rising advertising costs, while specific exemptions remain for auctions and public tenders under $500,000.
03:42:31 Speaker 09: report FRCW 1926 Healthcare Funding Request
03:42:33 Speaker 09: 2027 Budget be received, and that
03:42:35 Speaker 09: staff be directed to maintain the
03:42:36 Speaker 09: budget. Be directed to maintain the
03:42:38 Speaker 09: budgeted two hundred thousand dollar transfer
03:42:41 Speaker 09: to the healthcare initiatives reserve for
03:42:42 Speaker 09: the twenty twenty seven budget and
03:42:44 Speaker 09: twenty twenty eight projected budgets, and
03:42:46 Speaker 07: that staff be directed to include
03:42:48 Speaker 07: the Sogin Hospice Inc. request of
03:42:50 Speaker 07: one hundred and seventy five thousand
03:42:53 Speaker 07: to be included for consideration in
03:42:57 Speaker 07: the twenty twenty seven to twenty
03:42:58 Speaker 07: twenty thirty one budgets of thirty
03:43:01 Speaker 07: five thousand dollars per year to
03:43:02 Speaker 07: be funded from the healthcare funding
03:43:04 Speaker 07: reserve. So, may I ask for
03:43:05 Speaker 07: a mover and a seconder? Let
03:43:06 Speaker 07: it move by Councillor Hutchinson, seconded
03:43:07 Speaker 07: by Councillor Dicker. It's now on
03:43:09 Speaker 07: the floor for discussion. And welcome,
03:43:11 Speaker 07: interim director of finance, Murray. Thank
03:43:13 Speaker 07: you, Andrew Newardon. As you are
03:43:14 Speaker 07: aware, in 2022, the Gray County
03:43:16 Speaker 07: did pass a health and healthcare
03:43:19 Speaker 07: funding policy, and the details are
03:43:21 Speaker 07: a little bit in the report.
03:43:22 Speaker 07: I won't go into that in
03:43:23 Speaker 07: my. narrative right now. But so
03:43:25 Speaker 07: we do ask that if there
03:43:27 Speaker 07: are any organisations that would request
03:43:28 Speaker 07: a donation, that it must be
03:43:29 Speaker 07: submitted by June 30th to us.
03:43:30 Speaker 07: And we did receive one formal
03:43:32 Speaker 07: request in December of 2025. They
03:43:36 Speaker 07: did do a formal presentation, and
03:43:44 Speaker 07: then Pablo got up with a
03:43:45 Speaker 41: written request for 175,000 to be
03:43:50 Speaker 41: funded over three to five years.
03:43:53 Speaker 17: There was request to help build
03:43:58 Speaker 17: a hospice in in Great. In
03:44:04 Speaker 17: in Gray County, in part of
03:44:09 Speaker 17: Gray County, so I have I
03:44:14 Speaker 17: am recommending that we include that
03:44:15 Speaker 17: in our budget for discussion. I
03:44:19 Speaker 17: am recommending that it be funded
03:44:22 Speaker 17: over five years, which would be
03:44:23 Speaker 17: thirty five thousand per year, to
03:44:27 Speaker 17: be funded out of our current
03:44:28 Speaker 17: healthcare reserve. So there would be
03:44:31 Speaker 17: no levy request added to the
03:44:34 Speaker 17: levy in twenty twenty seven. Our
03:44:38 Speaker 17: current reserve balance at the end
03:44:42 Speaker 17: of twenty twenty six is projected
03:44:44 Speaker 17: to be just a little over
03:44:46 Speaker 17: two hundred and twenty seven thousand,
03:44:50 Speaker 17: and at the end of 2027,
03:44:51 Speaker 17: if we were to include the
03:44:53 Speaker 17: thirty-five thousand dollars on top of
03:44:57 Speaker 17: the two hundred thousand that Gray
03:44:59 Speaker 17: County is already committed to for
03:45:03 Speaker 17: the Wellness and Recovery Centre for
03:45:05 Speaker 17: the Gravurs Health Services, that would
03:45:10 Speaker 17: leave us with a balance at
03:45:12 Speaker 17: the end of a 2027 proposed
03:45:18 Speaker 17: draft budget of 192,144 dollars. And
03:45:19 Speaker 17: that's all I was going to
03:45:22 Speaker 17: say today. If anyone, so I
03:45:25 Speaker 17: will turn it over for any
03:45:27 Speaker 17: questions. Thank you very much, and
03:45:27 Speaker 17: I'll look to committee. The whole
03:45:30 Speaker 17: members, if they have any questions
03:45:34 Speaker 17: on that plan, Deputy Warden. Thank
03:45:38 Speaker 17: you, Madam Warden, and thank you,
03:45:39 Speaker 17: Sue. I I'm going to say
03:45:42 Speaker 17: that I'm going to oppose the
03:45:46 Speaker 17: motion, but at the same time
03:45:48 Speaker 17: support the need for this facility.
03:45:51 Speaker 17: How long? And I'll ask a
03:45:53 Speaker 17: rhetorical question: How long are we
03:45:55 Speaker 17: going to let? the province off
03:45:58 Speaker 17: the hook? Healthcare is a provincial
03:46:01 Speaker 17: responsibility. It is not the responsibility
03:46:03 Speaker 17: of the land taxpayer, property taxpayer.
03:46:08 Speaker 17: I guess that's the gist of
03:46:11 Speaker 17: my my my words. I I
03:46:13 Speaker 17: just can't support this. The province
03:46:15 Speaker 17: has for too long been let
03:46:16 Speaker 17: off the hook, and I'm not
03:46:18 Speaker 17: prepared to support this. Thank you.
03:46:20 Speaker 17: Other comments? Any follow-up from staff
03:46:23 Speaker 17: with regards to that? No. Oh,
03:46:24 Speaker 07: sorry. Oh, we'll go to Councillor
03:46:25 Speaker 07: McLean then. Thank you, Madam Warden.
03:46:27 Speaker 07: And just to be brief, I
03:46:29 Speaker 07: know that this policy was developed.
03:46:30 Speaker 07: I think you said 2022. I
03:46:32 Speaker 07: know it talks about in the
03:46:34 Speaker 07: report that it must demonstrate that
03:46:36 Speaker 07: 20% of the house of those
03:46:37 Speaker 07: it serves must be great. Must
03:46:38 Speaker 07: be Gray County residents. I know
03:46:44 Speaker 07: there was a presentation from Southern
03:46:47 Speaker 07: Georgia Bay Hospital Group that is
03:46:49 Speaker 07: raising, you know, a million dollars
03:46:52 Speaker 07: for the Collingwood or the new
03:46:54 Speaker 07: Southern Georgia Bay Hospital. And I
03:46:58 Speaker 07: know that they got discouraged and
03:47:00 Speaker 07: they went away. But I think,
03:47:01 Speaker 07: in the sense, and this is
03:47:02 Speaker 07: just maybe for the next term
03:47:08 Speaker 07: of council, that maybe that policy
03:47:11 Speaker 07: needs to be reviewed because when
03:47:14 Speaker 07: it says twenty percent of its
03:47:16 Speaker 07: residents are to be served, that
03:47:18 Speaker 07: was I think I think originally
03:47:22 Speaker 07: went back to two thousand eighteen
03:47:24 Speaker 12: is when. Back 2018 is when
03:47:25 Speaker 12: that first came forward. When you
03:47:27 Speaker 12: talk about residents and you talk
03:47:29 Speaker 12: about the Blue Mountains and the
03:47:31 Speaker 12: Blue Mountain Resorts, I think if
03:47:33 Speaker 12: you're a guest for one night,
03:47:34 Speaker 12: you're a resident. Anyway, I'm not
03:47:36 Speaker 12: going to get into that tonight
03:47:41 Speaker 12: or today, but I think there
03:47:44 Speaker 12: needs to be a review of
03:47:52 Speaker 12: that policy, and I'll leave it
03:47:56 Speaker 12: at that. Okay. Any other comments,
03:48:01 Speaker 12: Councillor Eccles? Thank you. I agree.
03:48:02 Speaker 12: with some of the things that
03:48:05 Speaker 12: Councillor Deputy Warden Millen states. This
03:48:06 Speaker 42: isn't one of the ones I
03:48:08 Speaker 42: agree with him on. Yes, we
03:48:10 Speaker 42: do need these facilities. It's not
03:48:12 Speaker 42: quite healthcare, but it's the end-of-life
03:48:14 Speaker 42: care. Quickly, Sue. I don't know
03:48:17 Speaker 42: whether you have the information. What
03:48:20 Speaker 42: did we, as Gray County, put
03:48:22 Speaker 42: into Chapman House? We've already been
03:48:24 Speaker 42: down this road, and I believe
03:48:26 Speaker 42: that the county had money in.
03:48:29 Speaker 42: I can see Councillor Patterson nodding.
03:48:32 Speaker 42: That I believe we did put
03:48:34 Speaker 42: something in there. But the other
03:48:38 Speaker 42: factor is in healthcare; it goes
03:48:41 Speaker 42: well beyond hospice care. how many
03:48:43 Speaker 42: of the municipalities, how many property
03:48:46 Speaker 42: tax dollars have gone into the
03:48:47 Speaker 42: new building in Markdale? And I
03:48:50 Speaker 42: know that Southgate put in over
03:48:54 Speaker 42: three hundred thousand into that one.
03:49:00 Speaker 42: Yeah, I agree with you, but
03:49:04 Speaker 42: it's where we're at with the
03:49:06 Speaker 42: province on delivering healthcare—not just the
03:49:09 Speaker 42: bricks and mortar. It's the continuous
03:49:12 Speaker 42: maintenance and upgrades and. equipment that
03:49:18 Speaker 42: we continue to put into healthcare.
03:49:20 Speaker 42: I'm wondering if we were doing
03:49:22 Speaker 42: the same thing. I guess maybe
03:49:25 Speaker 42: we'd have to ask, you know,
03:49:27 Speaker 42: the property tax payers to add
03:49:32 Speaker 42: in and pay more, or if
03:49:34 Speaker 42: we could get the province to
03:49:38 Speaker 42: start putting more fuel into our
03:49:42 Speaker 42: graders to, or get a few
03:49:44 Speaker 42: more zambonis that somebody would purchase.
03:49:47 Speaker 42: so we can keep running our
03:49:53 Speaker 42: arenas. But that's a different topic.
03:49:56 Speaker 42: I I will be supporting this
03:49:58 Speaker 42: for the fact that it's an
03:50:01 Speaker 42: initiative. It is for five years,
03:50:05 Speaker 42: and it's done. And it is
03:50:07 Speaker 42: our commitment to the health of
03:50:09 Speaker 42: our communities, and to the welfare
03:50:11 Speaker 42: of the citizens of our communities.
03:50:13 Speaker 42: So I will be supporting the
03:50:15 Speaker 42: recommendations it states. Okay, thank you.
03:50:17 Speaker 42: Other comments, Councillor McQueen, and then
03:50:18 Speaker 42: Councillor Nielsen. Well, just following up
03:50:22 Speaker 42: on what the requirements are for
03:50:24 Speaker 42: healthcare. Just again, in the
03:50:26 Speaker 42: Southern Georgian Bay Hospital, they got
03:50:30 Speaker 42: to raise a hundred million for
03:50:32 Speaker 42: a billion-dollar hospital. So, but I
03:50:35 Speaker 42: do want to put a shout
03:50:37 Speaker 42: out for the Beaver Valley Ski
03:50:39 Speaker 42: Club. Just in June, they raised
03:50:42 Speaker 42: seventy-five thousand dollars for the for
03:50:43 Speaker 42: the Chapman House. So, a lot
03:50:45 Speaker 42: of funds are raised from local
03:50:47 Speaker 42: organisations that go back into those
03:50:49 Speaker 42: hospice. and I think that you
03:50:51 Speaker 42: know we all would agree that
03:50:53 Speaker 42: the end of life care is
03:50:54 Speaker 42: is so so important for sure.
03:50:56 Speaker 42: Councillor Nielsen, thank you very much.
03:51:01 Speaker 42: Word Master, often forgive me. I'm
03:51:05 Speaker 42: just trying to remember. The delegation
03:51:08 Speaker 42: and was the request from the
03:51:15 Speaker 42: hospice operational or capital funding? That
03:51:19 Speaker 42: I can I did confirm that
03:51:24 Speaker 42: the funds would go directly to
03:51:26 Speaker 43: the building of the of the
03:51:28 Speaker 43: hospice itself. Okay, and we'll look
03:51:30 Speaker 43: to the CAO. Just through Councillor
03:51:33 Speaker 43: Echo's question earlier, with respect to
03:51:35 Speaker 43: how much the county provided to
03:51:37 Speaker 43: the Chapman House, I did find
03:51:40 Speaker 43: some correspondence indicates that back in
03:51:44 Speaker 43: 2017 we provided a one-time capital
03:51:46 Speaker 43: grant of two hundred thousand dollars
03:51:48 Speaker 43: towards the construction, which again would
03:51:51 Speaker 43: be close to ten years ago
03:51:53 Speaker 43: in terms of towards that that
03:51:55 Speaker 43: particular project. So there could be
03:51:56 Speaker 43: more. funding that was provided, but
03:51:59 Speaker 43: that was definitely the amount that
03:52:01 Speaker 43: I could find in a short
03:52:05 Speaker 43: period of time. Thank you for
03:52:12 Speaker 43: that information. Okay, Councillor Gray. I
03:52:14 Speaker 43: would just like to state that
03:52:17 Speaker 43: I oppose the motion as is.
03:52:20 Speaker 43: There, because we have a. two
03:52:22 Speaker 43: hundred thousand dollar budget line item,
03:52:24 Speaker 43: does not mean it has to
03:52:26 Speaker 43: exist in continuity and that it's
03:52:28 Speaker 43: there to be drawn from. We
03:52:31 Speaker 43: have various investments and other healthcare
03:52:33 Speaker 43: initiatives, the Bayview Wellness, which is
03:52:35 Speaker 43: the two hundred thousand dollars, where
03:52:38 Speaker 43: you can easily demonstrate the impact
03:52:41 Speaker 43: in terms of reducing strain on
03:52:43 Speaker 43: some of the resources that the
03:52:46 Speaker 43: hospital may provide or that we
03:52:49 Speaker 43: provide through Kevin's team. In fact,
03:52:52 Speaker 43: just earlier, Kevin. spoke about hospital
03:52:53 Speaker 43: offloading. We have certain operational costs
03:52:55 Speaker 43: that we embed in our work
03:52:56 Speaker 43: here, which reduces strain in other
03:53:01 Speaker 43: in other systems that provide services
03:53:07 Speaker 43: for the public. But this is
03:53:10 Speaker 43: not one I can get behind.
03:53:13 Speaker 43: I firmly believe that the plaque
03:53:15 Speaker 43: on the wall is there
03:53:18 Speaker 12: to perhaps show Joe's excavating or.
03:53:19 Speaker 12: Murray's hauling whatever you know, a
03:53:21 Speaker 12: lawyer's office, a commercial interest that
03:53:24 Speaker 12: has something to gain with the
03:53:27 Speaker 12: exposure by investing and making that
03:53:29 Speaker 12: economic or that financial support. I'm
03:53:30 Speaker 12: totally on side with where we
03:53:33 Speaker 12: can and supported Chapman House, you
03:53:35 Speaker 12: know, and found where we can
03:53:38 Speaker 12: reduce soft services, soft costs. at
03:53:40 Speaker 12: the times of construction, waived DCs,
03:53:43 Speaker 12: certain municipal fees that can be
03:53:44 Speaker 12: waived, that are incremental, that are
03:53:47 Speaker 12: there, totally on, totally in support
03:53:49 Speaker 12: of supporting organisations such as this
03:53:52 Speaker 12: with initiatives like that. But in
03:53:54 Speaker 12: terms of just providing support financially,
03:53:56 Speaker 12: where the taxpayer can then see.
03:53:59 Speaker 12: that a on a level of
03:54:02 Speaker 12: government just donated their money is
03:54:04 Speaker 12: not something that I can get
03:54:06 Speaker 12: behind. I understand perhaps the the
03:54:08 Speaker 12: donation to Chapman House as well
03:54:11 Speaker 12: in the past, but again I
03:54:12 Speaker 12: referred to it earlier today. Times
03:54:15 Speaker 12: may be different if we're looking
03:54:17 Speaker 12: at five, six, seven percent increases
03:54:19 Speaker 12: in our tax lines. This is
03:54:21 Speaker 12: a tax line that should see
03:54:24 Speaker 12: scrutiny when it comes budget time
03:54:26 Speaker 12: and when that two. hundred thousand
03:54:31 Speaker 12: dollar donate donation commitment ends, then
03:54:35 Speaker 12: this is an opportunity where that
03:54:38 Speaker 12: two hundred thousand dollar line item
03:54:39 Speaker 13: should be evaluated by the
03:54:41 Speaker 13: council of the day. So, I
03:54:43 Speaker 13: I'm not in favour of us
03:54:47 Speaker 13: committing because it is a commitment.
03:54:51 Speaker 13: It's only going into the budget,
03:54:53 Speaker 13: but it is showing commitment again
03:54:55 Speaker 13: to maintaining that two hundred thousand
03:54:57 Speaker 13: dollar line item, which I think
03:55:00 Speaker 13: in this case should have future
03:55:01 Speaker 13: scrutiny by. council in terms of
03:55:04 Speaker 13: whether it stays or whether it
03:55:06 Speaker 13: goes out of the budget in
03:55:11 Speaker 13: future years. Okay, thank you. Any
03:55:14 Speaker 13: further comments? Not seeing any other
03:55:17 Speaker 13: hands. Oh, sorry, Councillor Kennedy. Thank
03:55:18 Speaker 13: you, Madam Warden. I just think
03:55:29 Speaker 13: that we, the Deputy Warden's. comments
03:55:30 Speaker 13: are certainly apropos, but I think
03:55:35 Speaker 03: that it's time that we get
03:55:42 Speaker 03: behind the movement to try and
03:55:48 Speaker 03: fix the problem with the province,
03:55:56 Speaker 03: and and that this should be
03:56:00 Speaker 03: the beginning of a of a
03:56:04 Speaker 03: move to try and change things,
03:56:05 Speaker 03: and to and it's going to
03:56:14 Speaker 15: take some work for municipalities to
03:56:17 Speaker 15: and maybe when you're at the
03:56:20 Speaker 03: AMO in the next little while.
03:56:22 Speaker 03: you'll have some discussions with the
03:56:24 Speaker 02: other municipal representatives around the province
03:56:27 Speaker 02: and see if we can't, you
03:56:28 Speaker 02: know, move the needle with the
03:56:31 Speaker 02: province on healthcare, which the whole
03:56:32 Speaker 02: system is pretty close to broke.
03:56:33 Speaker 02: I think it's awfully difficult to,
03:56:34 Speaker 02: having supported hospitals and hospices to
03:56:37 Speaker 02: the degree that Grey County has
03:56:38 Speaker 02: for many, many years, I think
03:56:40 Speaker 02: just. I I think just a
03:56:42 Speaker 02: an open break and say so
03:56:44 Speaker 02: sad but we're done is just
03:56:48 Speaker 02: not the way to to move
03:56:51 Speaker 02: on it and I think that
03:56:54 Speaker 02: there are better ways and they
03:56:56 Speaker 02: will be take time and work
03:56:57 Speaker 02: but that's what needs to be
03:57:00 Speaker 02: done and that we you know
03:57:01 Speaker 02: I think council should examine every
03:57:03 Speaker 02: year what has contributed to some
03:57:04 Speaker 02: of these causes but there's a
03:57:06 Speaker 02: long established tradition of Gray County
03:57:08 Speaker 02: standing behind the most important needs
03:57:11 Speaker 02: of our communities, and that, and
03:57:12 Speaker 02: we know there's a great need
03:57:13 Speaker 02: for this new hospice, and that
03:57:16 Speaker 42: we should continue to support it.
03:57:18 Speaker 42: Thank you. Thank you. Any other
03:57:19 Speaker 42: comments, CAO? Just further to through
03:57:21 Speaker 42: your warden, through to Councillor Greg's
03:57:23 Speaker 42: comments with respect to in terms
03:57:25 Speaker 42: of the. incoming council's consideration, future
03:57:28 Speaker 42: budget considerations, the way the motion
03:57:30 Speaker 42: is currently worded is that staff
03:57:33 Speaker 42: be directed to include this request
03:57:36 Speaker 42: of 175,000 included for consideration in
03:57:40 Speaker 42: those respective budgets of 35,000 per
03:57:42 Speaker 42: year to be funded from the
03:57:46 Speaker 42: healthcare funding reserve. So there would
03:57:50 Speaker 42: be consideration, even if this motion
03:57:53 Speaker 42: were to be approved, there would
03:57:55 Speaker 42: be consideration for that to be,
03:57:58 Speaker 42: I guess, reconsidered or discussed further
03:58:00 Speaker 42: with respect to. when we go
03:58:02 Speaker 42: through the the budget process, as
03:58:06 Speaker 42: part of that, is as least
03:58:12 Speaker 42: my take in terms of the
03:58:14 Speaker 42: wording. And so, but as per
03:58:15 Speaker 42: the current policy, we received a
03:58:17 Speaker 39: request before the June 30th deadline.
03:58:17 Speaker 39: As as as interim director Murray
03:58:19 Speaker 39: noted, it meets the policy requirements
03:58:22 Speaker 39: as set out by the policy
03:58:24 Speaker 39: that was approved by council. I
03:58:25 Speaker 39: think interim director Murray's come up
03:58:27 Speaker 39: with a you know identified. Here's
03:58:29 Speaker 39: where we're at with the with
03:58:31 Speaker 39: the current reserve amount, and here's
03:58:36 Speaker 39: how it could be funded. But
03:58:39 Speaker 39: recognizing that that could still be
03:58:41 Speaker 39: up for consideration as as part
03:58:43 Speaker 39: of the overall budget discussions is
03:58:44 Speaker 39: is my current take of of
03:58:46 Speaker 39: the wording of the motion. Okay,
03:58:49 Speaker 39: thank you, Councillor Dobrin. Thank you,
03:58:53 Speaker 39: and through you, twofold. If you
03:58:54 Speaker 39: were asking us to commit one
03:58:56 Speaker 39: hundred seventy five thousand. Commit one
03:59:01 Speaker 39: hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars one-time
03:59:02 Speaker 39: payment. I would have issue. I
03:59:04 Speaker 39: would have concern. We have committed
03:59:06 Speaker 39: other areas two hundred thousand dollars
03:59:08 Speaker 39: in its entirety, and this is
03:59:10 Speaker 39: over a five-year period. But this
03:59:11 Speaker 39: is still to be decided by
03:59:13 Speaker 39: the incoming council as to what's
03:59:14 Speaker 39: in, what's out. Are we continuing?
03:59:18 Speaker 39: Are we not continuing? So this
03:59:19 Speaker 39: is a more of a recommendation
03:59:22 Speaker 39: to. the new council as to
03:59:23 Speaker 39: what to consider. Could you just
03:59:24 Speaker 39: refresh my memory? The Sogin Hospice
03:59:26 Speaker 39: was going to be located in
03:59:29 Speaker 39: Walkerton. Through you, Warren. Yes, that's
03:59:31 Speaker 39: that's our understanding. Is that it's
03:59:32 Speaker 39: to be built in in in
03:59:34 Speaker 39: Walkerton in the northeast corner of
03:59:35 Speaker 39: Walkerton. so therefore not located in
03:59:37 Speaker 39: Gray County and northeast. Okay, thank
03:59:39 Speaker 39: you. I answered my question. Thank
03:59:41 Speaker 39: you. Okay, any other comments? Okay,
03:59:44 Speaker 39: then I will call the question.
03:59:45 Speaker 39: All those in favour. All the
03:59:46 Speaker 39: question. All those in favour? Okay,
03:59:48 Speaker 39: that motion is carried. Thank you.
03:59:51 Speaker 39: Okay, thank you very much, Treasurer
03:59:52 Speaker 39: Murray. And at this point in
03:59:54 Speaker 39: time, before we go to seven
03:59:57 Speaker 39: H, because it is tied to
03:59:59 Speaker 39: the closed session material, we will
04:00:02 Speaker 39: now return to items six C
04:00:04 Speaker 39: and F, unless there's any objection
04:00:05 Speaker 39: to that. But it would make
04:00:07 Speaker 39: more sense for the flow of
04:00:09 Speaker 39: what we. have to do this
04:00:10 Speaker 39: afternoon. Okay, seeing no objections, we
04:00:11 Speaker 39: will then go to item six
04:00:13 Speaker 39: C, the first item which was
04:00:17 Speaker 39: pulled. Oh, so I guess get
04:00:18 Speaker 39: ready, come on back, Madam Treasurer.
04:00:19 Speaker 39: It's recommended that report FRCW eighteen
04:00:21 Speaker 39: twenty six regarding the quarterly purchasing
04:00:23 Speaker 39: report for quarter two of twenty
04:00:24 Speaker 39: twenty six be received for information.
04:00:25 Speaker 39: May ask for a mover and
04:00:27 Speaker 39: a seconder. I got it moved
04:00:32 Speaker 39: by Councillor Keaveny, seconded by Councillor
04:00:33 Speaker 39: Gregg. It's on. By Councillor Gregg.
04:00:36 Speaker 39: So on the floor for discussion,
04:00:37 Speaker 39: Councillor Gregg, you had asked to
04:00:40 Speaker 39: pull this to share a question.
04:00:41 Speaker 39: Please go ahead. I do, which
04:00:43 Speaker 39: might be better than having to
04:00:46 Speaker 39: go through all the line items
04:00:49 Speaker 39: in the quarterly purchasing purchasing report,
04:00:51 Speaker 39: which I thank you for presenting
04:00:53 Speaker 12: or preparing for us. My question,
04:00:55 Speaker 12: when I was reading it, there
04:00:58 Speaker 12: was a line item. It was
04:00:59 Speaker 12: seven one three Ninth Avenue East,
04:01:03 Speaker 12: and it was a roofing project.
04:01:06 Speaker 12: And in to my memory, I
04:01:09 Speaker 12: had no recollection of this ever
04:01:11 Speaker 12: being. in exposed during budget to
04:01:14 Speaker 12: council, and in reaching out to
04:01:15 Speaker 12: staff, well, perhaps I'll let you
04:01:18 Speaker 12: present as to why that is.
04:01:19 Speaker 12: I think I wonder about strengthening
04:01:22 Speaker 12: our policy in the future so
04:01:23 Speaker 12: that an expenditure that size, that's
04:01:27 Speaker 12: not on an existing capital plan,
04:01:30 Speaker 12: is something that council is made
04:01:32 Speaker 12: aware of. Councils made aware of
04:01:34 Speaker 12: before it just appears on a
04:01:38 Speaker 12: quarterly report. Yes, thank you for
04:01:41 Speaker 12: that question. This project, which Harrison
04:01:45 Speaker 12: has is you directed the question
04:01:48 Speaker 12: to him. He answered it, so
04:01:50 Speaker 12: I'm going to try to. He
04:01:53 Speaker 12: probably has more of the devil
04:01:55 Speaker 12: in the details, but I I
04:01:57 Speaker 12: truly feel reflecting upon it. Yep,
04:01:58 Speaker 12: I as we as finance did
04:02:01 Speaker 12: not do. Maybe the steps we
04:02:04 Speaker 12: probably should have done in the
04:02:05 Speaker 12: correct order. I think it was.
04:02:07 Speaker 12: some of it was some timing
04:02:10 Speaker 12: issues around grants being approved and
04:02:13 Speaker 12: not hitting reports the way we
04:02:14 Speaker 12: should have. So going forward, definitely
04:02:17 Speaker 12: this should have been brought a
04:02:18 Speaker 12: report to council should have been
04:02:20 Speaker 12: brought to you your attention on
04:02:23 Speaker 12: this capital project. There was in
04:02:26 Speaker 12: twenty twenty four twenty five was
04:02:28 Speaker 12: there was some co chief funds
04:02:30 Speaker 12: there was an investment plan presented.
04:02:34 Speaker 12: It was in. in there, and
04:02:38 Speaker 12: then in I think in the
04:02:41 Speaker 12: fall of twenty twenty five there
04:02:42 Speaker 12: was a tender for that project
04:02:44 Speaker 12: build, and the and then the
04:02:45 Speaker 12: staff decided that they re tendered.
04:02:49 Speaker 15: There was two bids, and then
04:02:52 Speaker 15: they re tendered it back, and
04:02:54 Speaker 15: unfortunately we missed picking it back
04:02:56 Speaker 15: up into that next budget cycle.
04:02:59 Speaker 15: So there were some missed pieces
04:03:02 Speaker 15: along the way, and I own
04:03:05 Speaker 15: those as finance. So, but I
04:03:07 Speaker 15: what could I can tell to
04:03:09 Speaker 15: you going forward is that we
04:03:11 Speaker 15: will. do better. Going forward, we
04:03:13 Speaker 15: should have realized in when we
04:03:15 Speaker 15: did our capital project report earlier
04:03:18 Speaker 15: to you that we should have
04:03:20 Speaker 15: included it in there. But I
04:03:23 Speaker 15: think that too was also a
04:03:26 Speaker 15: timing difference because there were no
04:03:28 Speaker 15: expenditures. We didn't have a capital
04:03:31 Speaker 15: project identified to that project in
04:03:34 Speaker 15: our budget. hadn't spent it, and
04:03:37 Speaker 15: it was right around the time
04:03:41 Speaker 15: we were doing the report, and
04:03:44 Speaker 15: it wasn't quite. It was purely
04:03:50 Speaker 15: a timing issue. Going forward, I
04:03:51 Speaker 15: did speak with our purchasing manager
04:03:52 Speaker 15: this morning. Going forward, we will
04:03:55 Speaker 15: ensure that when we are doing
04:03:58 Speaker 15: capital projects, we will also identify
04:03:59 Speaker 15: a capital project number so that
04:04:01 Speaker 15: we can identify it back into
04:04:03 Speaker 15: our budget book, and/or we also
04:04:05 Speaker 15: will, for our internal purposes, need
04:04:07 Speaker 15: to know because there will be
04:04:09 Speaker 15: capital expenditures that we need to
04:04:10 Speaker 15: apply to a capital project going
04:04:11 Speaker 15: forward for our reporting purposes. That's
04:04:13 Speaker 07: the the nice thing about our
04:04:16 Speaker 07: new budgeting software is it allows
04:04:17 Speaker 07: us to do that because there
04:04:20 Speaker 07: are projects sometimes where we do
04:04:23 Speaker 07: budget. Times where we do budget
04:04:25 Speaker 07: for stuff that doesn't actually have
04:04:27 Speaker 07: a capital project, and then we
04:04:29 Speaker 07: have to sort of create one
04:04:32 Speaker 07: behind the scenes because there's a
04:04:33 Speaker 07: future report. So, okay, thank you.
04:04:35 Speaker 07: We're also going to go to
04:04:37 Speaker 07: the CAO. Through you, Warden, and
04:04:39 Speaker 07: just further to interim director Murray's
04:04:41 Speaker 07: comments with respect to this, just
04:04:43 Speaker 07: to provide some context with respect
04:04:44 Speaker 07: to this project and how that
04:04:46 Speaker 07: project was funded. So, as as
04:04:48 Speaker 07: interim director indicated that this this
04:04:49 Speaker 07: project was. not listed as a
04:04:51 Speaker 07: project, a specific project in the
04:04:52 Speaker 07: capital budget. It's funded entirely from
04:04:55 Speaker 07: our our Cochi grant. So these
04:04:57 Speaker 07: are provincial funds that we receive
04:04:59 Speaker 07: on an annual basis, and and
04:05:00 Speaker 07: through that, what what has been
04:05:02 Speaker 07: the historical practice is that we
04:05:04 Speaker 07: develop what's the housing department develops
04:05:06 Speaker 07: an investment plan, and that goes
04:05:07 Speaker 07: through in this case the community
04:05:09 Speaker 07: services committee to identify where we
04:05:10 Speaker 07: might be able to. look at
04:05:11 Speaker 07: some projects for allocations. There is
04:05:13 Speaker 07: funds that are set aside and
04:05:14 Speaker 07: allocated for unidentified capital projects. For
04:05:16 Speaker 07: five hundred thousand dollars, that's that
04:05:18 Speaker 07: was allocated with respect to that.
04:05:19 Speaker 07: That was initially earmarked for the
04:05:20 Speaker 07: Dundalk build project, and as as
04:05:25 Speaker 07: we you've heard through updates, that
04:05:30 Speaker 07: project has been delayed, and this
04:05:32 Speaker 07: this particular project popped up in
04:05:32 Speaker 07: terms of. needing to be done,
04:05:35 Speaker 07: and so in order to utilise
04:05:37 Speaker 07: and maximize the use of those
04:05:39 Speaker 15: funds, it was determined by staff
04:05:46 Speaker 15: at that that time to be
04:05:49 Speaker 15: able to proceed with that piece.
04:05:52 Speaker 15: As interim director Murray's indicated, I
04:05:54 Speaker 15: think there's is an opportunity to
04:05:56 Speaker 15: look at what that process looks
04:05:58 Speaker 15: like going forward, so that councils
04:06:01 Speaker 15: not seeing that project at this
04:06:05 Speaker 15: stage in terms of once it's
04:06:07 Speaker 15: already been tendered and and completed.
04:06:11 Speaker 15: And complete it, and so we're
04:06:13 Speaker 15: looking to see what how we
04:06:16 Speaker 15: can improve those processes on a
04:06:19 Speaker 15: go forward basis. So appreciate Councillor
04:06:23 Speaker 15: Greg raising raising that question, and
04:06:24 Speaker 15: we can we'll explore what those
04:06:25 Speaker 15: those process improvements look like on
04:06:26 Speaker 15: a go forward basis. Okay, thank
04:06:29 Speaker 15: you, and don't see any further
04:06:31 Speaker 15: questions on this matter. So I'll
04:06:33 Speaker 15: I will call the question. All
04:06:34 Speaker 15: those in favour, and that motion
04:06:36 Speaker 15: is carried. Thank you. Next, we'll
04:06:37 Speaker 15: tidy up with Section Six at
04:06:38 Speaker 15: F. It's recommended that Report TRCW
04:06:41 Speaker 15: twenty nine twenty six be received,
04:06:42 Speaker 15: and that a bylaw be brought
04:06:46 Speaker 15: forward for council's consideration to amend
04:06:52 Speaker 15: Schedule A of Bylaw forty nine
04:06:54 Speaker 15: forty five sixteen, being a being
04:06:56 Speaker 15: the bylaw to permit off road
04:06:57 Speaker 15: vehicles on certain roadways under the
04:07:00 Speaker 15: jurisdiction of the County of Grey
04:07:02 Speaker 15: by mending portions of Grey. Mending
04:07:03 Speaker 44: portions of Gray Road 10 and
04:07:05 Speaker 44: Gray Road 28 where off-road vehicles
04:07:07 Speaker 44: are not permitted. Specifically, Gray Road
04:07:09 Speaker 44: 10 from the south limit of
04:07:11 Speaker 44: Gray County to Natville Road, and
04:07:12 Speaker 44: Gray County Road 10 from Seventh
04:07:14 Speaker 44: Avenue in Hanover to the northern
04:07:17 Speaker 44: limit of Gray County, and Gray
04:07:19 Speaker 44: County Road 28 from the intersection
04:07:22 Speaker 44: of Concession Concession 2 NDR and
04:07:24 Speaker 44: Fifth Side Road NDR. to Bruce
04:07:27 Speaker 44: to Bruce Road, ten Seventh Avenue,
04:07:30 Speaker 44: Hanover. Okay, so may I ask
04:07:33 Speaker 44: for a mover and a seconder?
04:07:34 Speaker 44: Okay, we've got it moved by
04:07:37 Speaker 44: Councillor McQueen, seconded, seconded by Councillor
04:07:40 Speaker 44: Pringle. So it's on the floor.
04:07:42 Speaker 44: I'm going to go to Councillor
04:07:44 Speaker 44: McQueen first, and then Director Hoy
04:07:46 Speaker 44: will stand in for staff response.
04:07:48 Speaker 44: So Councillor McQueen, you would pull
04:07:50 Speaker 44: this. Okay, thank you, Madam Warden,
04:07:52 Speaker 44: and I have no issue with
04:07:54 Speaker 44: the with the resolution. that's in
04:07:57 Speaker 44: front of us. I guess the
04:08:01 Speaker 44: bigger question is in today's day,
04:08:03 Speaker 44: and I know this has been
04:08:04 Speaker 44: a download from the province, fifteen
04:08:06 Speaker 44: twenty years ago about who is
04:08:09 Speaker 44: the jurisdiction over side by side
04:08:12 Speaker 44: ATVs and all that stuff, off
04:08:16 Speaker 44: road vehicles on our municipal roads.
04:08:18 Speaker 44: I know from Grey Highlands we
04:08:21 Speaker 44: we have a bylaw that it
04:08:21 Speaker 44: just it just lists the exemptions,
04:08:23 Speaker 44: not the roads that are allowed.
04:08:28 Speaker 44: I wonder if at some point
04:08:29 Speaker 44: in the new new setting of
04:08:31 Speaker 44: this horseshoe is this is to
04:08:33 Speaker 44: be reviewed because in today's day,
04:08:35 Speaker 44: I bet you a lot of
04:08:38 Speaker 44: people going down our roads roads
04:08:40 Speaker 44: in Gray County don't have a
04:08:43 Speaker 44: clue that they're not supposed to
04:08:45 Speaker 44: be on county roads. And you
04:08:49 Speaker 44: know the sales of side by
04:08:52 Speaker 44: sides and and is continuing to
04:08:54 Speaker 44: grow and grow and grow and
04:08:58 Speaker 44: and you know people are almost
04:08:59 Speaker 44: using it as a means of
04:09:02 Speaker 44: transportation. So I think at some
04:09:05 Speaker 44: point the bylaws should be reviewed
04:09:07 Speaker 44: and its and its entirety and
04:09:08 Speaker 44: and just see if there is.
04:09:10 Speaker 44: maybe the other side of strict,
04:09:13 Speaker 44: you know, maybe looking at restricting
04:09:15 Speaker 44: the ones where you don't want
04:09:18 Speaker 44: them versus having it across. Not
04:09:20 Speaker 44: opening up the conversation today. I
04:09:22 Speaker 44: just, I think from today's day,
04:09:25 Speaker 44: probably most people using our roads
04:09:27 Speaker 44: have no clue, no clue that
04:09:29 Speaker 44: they're not supposed to be going
04:09:33 Speaker 44: down most county roads. Okay. Thank
04:09:35 Speaker 44: you. Any other comments? Okay. All
04:09:37 Speaker 44: right then. Looks like we're ready
04:09:40 Speaker 44: to call the vote. All those
04:09:43 Speaker 44: in favour? And that motion
04:09:46 Speaker 44: is carried. Thank you. Okay, that
04:09:48 Speaker 44: allows us to go then to
04:09:51 Speaker 44: item seven. Seven H. And we
04:09:53 Speaker 44: have our County Solicitor on standby.
04:09:55 Speaker 44: It's recommended that report LSR CW
04:09:59 Speaker 44: zero one twenty six regarding the
04:10:01 Speaker 44: updated land acquisition and disposition policy
04:10:03 Speaker 44: be received, and that the updated
04:10:05 Speaker 44: land acquisition and disposition policy be
04:10:06 Speaker 44: approved as presented, and that G.
04:10:09 Speaker 44: Gen zero zero three sale and
04:10:12 Speaker 44: acquisition land policy of land policy
04:10:13 Speaker 44: and G Gen zero zero three
04:10:15 Speaker 44: zero zero one sale of
04:10:18 Speaker 44: land procedure and G Gen zero
04:10:19 Speaker 44: zero three zero zero two
04:10:22 Speaker 44: acquisition of land procedure be rescinded.
04:10:23 Speaker 44: Okay, so what we'll do is
04:10:26 Speaker 44: I'm going to call for a
04:10:29 Speaker 44: mover and a seconder to get
04:10:30 Speaker 44: this on the floor for any
04:10:33 Speaker 44: open introduction, and then as I
04:10:35 Speaker 44: mentioned, we will then proceed into
04:10:36 Speaker 44: close. We will then proceed into
04:10:37 Speaker 44: closed session before we vote on
04:10:40 Speaker 44: the open session matter. So, with
04:10:41 Speaker 44: that, may I ask for a
04:10:45 Speaker 44: move and a second? Moved by
04:10:48 Speaker 44: Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the Deputy
04:10:49 Speaker 44: Warden. It's now on the floor
04:10:52 Speaker 44: for open discussion. And welcome, County
04:10:54 Speaker 44: Solicitor Morrison. Right. Good afternoon, and
04:10:57 Speaker 44: thank you, Madam Warden, County Council.
04:11:00 Speaker 44: So, the purpose of this report
04:11:02 Speaker 44: is to present Council with an
04:11:04 Speaker 44: updated land acquisition and disposition policy
04:11:07 Speaker 44: for consideration. and I would like
04:11:09 Speaker 44: to start off by thanking Lacey
04:11:11 Speaker 44: Thompson, our law clerk and real
04:11:12 Speaker 44: estate coordinator. She is here with
04:11:13 Speaker 44: us today to help ask any
04:11:17 Speaker 44: questions, but her hard work and
04:11:20 Speaker 44: dedication is why this is in
04:11:22 Speaker 44: front of us today. So the
04:11:24 Speaker 44: Municipal Act requires that municipalities adopt
04:11:27 Speaker 44: and maintain a policy with respect
04:11:30 Speaker 44: to the sale and disposition of
04:11:33 Speaker 44: land. Our current sale and acquisition
04:11:35 Speaker 44: of land policy and the two
04:11:38 Speaker 44: related procedures are from twenty twelve.
04:11:41 Speaker 44: 2012. They were amended in 2014,
04:11:42 Speaker 44: and staff have reviewed the current
04:11:46 Speaker 44: policy and procedures and are recommending
04:11:48 Speaker 44: an updated policy for council's consideration.
04:11:49 Speaker 44: There have been significant changes that
04:11:50 Speaker 44: have been made, but generally the
04:11:53 Speaker 44: process will remain the same. There
04:11:56 Speaker 44: are some key exceptions that we'll
04:11:57 Speaker 44: go over, but the policy is
04:12:01 Speaker 44: intended to ensure that the land
04:12:03 Speaker 44: transaction process is fair, open, and
04:12:06 Speaker 44: transparent while protecting the county's interests.
04:12:07 Speaker 44: So I will do. a high-level
04:12:09 Speaker 44: overview of the proposed changes, but
04:12:12 Speaker 44: happy to answer any questions on
04:12:15 Speaker 44: specific changes if you have them.
04:12:18 Speaker 44: So there was a fairly significant
04:12:19 Speaker 44: overall administrative update, which transitions the
04:12:22 Speaker 44: policy to the county's current policy
04:12:25 Speaker 44: template. So this consolidates the three
04:12:26 Speaker 44: documents into one policy
04:12:29 Speaker 44: document. The intent of this
04:12:31 Speaker 44: change is just to bring it
04:12:33 Speaker 44: up to our current policy template.
04:12:36 Speaker 44: The policy statement. the purpose, and
04:12:39 Speaker 44: the scope have all been updated,
04:12:41 Speaker 44: but the intent remains the same.
04:12:45 Speaker 44: We have added a table of
04:12:47 Speaker 44: contents for ease of reference. Section
04:12:49 Speaker 44: one, definitions and interpretation, have been
04:12:50 Speaker 44: updated to reflect the new policy.
04:12:53 Speaker 44: We have a new legislated requirements
04:12:55 Speaker 44: section, which is in accordance with
04:13:01 Speaker 44: the policy template. We have an
04:13:02 Speaker 44: updated exception section. This is to
04:13:04 Speaker 44: add clarity. We have a new.
04:13:05 Speaker 44: financial matters section. This is to
04:13:08 Speaker 15: bring us in line again with
04:13:10 Speaker 15: that new current accounting policy template.
04:13:12 Speaker 15: We have an updated value for
04:13:14 Speaker 15: land section, and there is a
04:13:17 Speaker 15: key change to highlight in this
04:13:20 Speaker 15: section, which is the addition of
04:13:22 Speaker 15: the staff value estimate method for
04:13:23 Speaker 07: land that is under seventy-five thousand.
04:13:25 Speaker 07: I will note that this does
04:13:27 Speaker 07: not permit staff proceed without council
04:13:28 Speaker 07: approval unless an exemption is found
04:13:29 Speaker 07: elsewhere in the policy. Both where
04:13:31 Speaker 07: in the policy, Section Six, valuation
04:13:33 Speaker 07: not required, has been updated, but
04:13:35 Speaker 07: the intent remains the same. We
04:13:37 Speaker 07: have an updated procedure for acquisition
04:13:39 Speaker 07: of land section. The intent remains
04:13:41 Speaker 07: the same, but we have expanded
04:13:43 Speaker 07: this for clarity. We have a
04:13:46 Speaker 07: new methods of acquisition section. The
04:13:49 Speaker 07: previous procedure combined procedure and methods
04:13:51 Speaker 07: into one section and contained additional
04:13:52 Speaker 07: sections for some specific methods. but
04:13:54 Speaker 07: we expanded it into its own
04:13:55 Speaker 07: new section and added additional methods
04:13:56 Speaker 07: for clarity. Section nine we have
04:13:57 Speaker 07: updated for the procedure of disposition.
04:13:58 Speaker 07: Again, same with the acquisition; the
04:14:00 Speaker 07: intent remains the same, but we
04:14:02 Speaker 07: have expanded it for clarity. We
04:14:03 Speaker 07: have an updated notice section under
04:14:04 Speaker 07: section ten. There is a key
04:14:05 Speaker 07: change to note in this section,
04:14:07 Speaker 07: where we have removed the requirement
04:14:12 Speaker 07: for newspaper publication as part of
04:14:13 Speaker 07: the notice requirements. The general circulation
04:14:15 Speaker 07: of newspapers has decreased, and finding
04:14:17 Speaker 44: a newspaper in the relevant geographic
04:14:19 Speaker 44: areas has become increasingly challenging. The
04:14:21 Speaker 44: cost for advertising has also increased,
04:14:23 Speaker 44: so we still would have notice.
04:14:24 Speaker 44: And depending on the method of
04:14:25 Speaker 44: sale, there may be additional notice.
04:14:27 Speaker 44: So we did give the example
04:14:30 Speaker 44: of real estates and their advertising
04:14:31 Speaker 44: and MLS postings and that kind
04:14:34 Speaker 44: of thing. We have an updated
04:14:36 Speaker 44: Section 11 for methods of disposition.
04:14:39 Speaker 44: The intent was to expand and.
04:14:41 Speaker 44: clarify the various methods here, and
04:14:43 Speaker 44: we have given it the example
04:14:45 Speaker 44: of depending on the method, there
04:14:46 Speaker 44: may be exemptions. So auctions, public
04:14:49 Speaker 44: tenders under five hundred thousand, and
04:14:50 Speaker 44: requests for proposals all have exemptions
04:14:52 Speaker 44: in them. But also noting that
04:14:54 Speaker 44: council approval would be required, so
04:14:55 Speaker 44: we'd come to council, ask for
04:14:58 Speaker 44: approval to go by one of
04:15:01 Speaker 44: those methods, and that's when the
04:15:03 Speaker 44: exemptions would kick in. So section
04:15:05 Speaker 44: twelve, we. have a new special
04:15:07 Speaker 44: acquisition and dispositions category. This was
04:15:11 Speaker 44: to highlight some special categories that
04:15:13 Speaker 44: didn't cleanly fit in the other
04:15:15 Speaker 44: headings. And then we have a
04:15:17 Speaker 44: new delegation of authority section, which
04:15:18 Speaker 44: the previous land acquisition procedure had
04:15:20 Speaker 44: a delegated authority section, whereas the
04:15:21 Speaker 44: sale procedure was largely silent. So,
04:15:24 Speaker 07: this is to add some clarity
04:15:25 Speaker 07: for both the sale and acquisition.
04:15:26 Speaker 07: And we have. an updated schedule
04:15:27 Speaker 07: A. There is a key change
04:15:29 Speaker 07: to note here, which is that
04:15:30 Speaker 07: we are proposing to increase the
04:15:34 Speaker 07: compensation amounts in the acquisition for
04:15:37 Speaker 07: road purposes to better reflect the
04:15:41 Speaker 07: current market conditions. So, as you
04:15:44 Speaker 07: can imagine, land values have increased
04:15:48 Speaker 07: significantly since 2012. Staff has found
04:15:50 Speaker 07: that the values in the current
04:15:53 Speaker 07: policy make it difficult to reach
04:15:55 Speaker 07: negotiated agreements without obtaining an appraisal
04:15:56 Speaker 07: or seeking additional direction from council,
04:15:58 Speaker 07: which. costs additional resources and causes
04:16:03 Speaker 17: delays. The updated schedule also includes
04:16:05 Speaker 17: the new method for staff valuations
04:16:06 Speaker 17: for land under seventy-five thousand. The
04:16:08 Speaker 17: intent is to support our colleagues
04:16:13 Speaker 17: in transportation services in negotiating agreements
04:16:15 Speaker 17: with landowners for acquisitions required for
04:16:17 Speaker 17: road purposes. The ability to secure
04:16:18 Speaker 44: property efficiently can significantly affect project
04:16:20 Speaker 44: timing, and so these additions are
04:16:23 Speaker 44: intended to support successful, efficient, and
04:16:25 Speaker 44: effective. negotiations, and and then so
04:16:31 Speaker 44: as Madam Ward noted, we do
04:16:33 Speaker 44: have a closed session component here,
04:16:35 Speaker 45: and where we have a new
04:16:38 Speaker 45: property negotiation guide, but we propose
04:16:42 Speaker 45: to discuss that in close to
04:16:45 Speaker 45: protect our negotiation power. Okay, thank
04:16:47 Speaker 45: you for that introduction to open.
04:16:49 Speaker 45: So just before we go into
04:16:51 Speaker 45: close to be able to discuss
04:16:53 Speaker 45: the the final pieces of this
04:16:56 Speaker 45: consideration prior to voting on this
04:16:59 Speaker 45: in open. On this and open,
04:17:01 Speaker 45: if you have an open session
04:17:03 Speaker 45: question, please go ahead, Councillor McLean.
04:17:04 Speaker 45: Thank you, Madam Warden, and I
04:17:08 Speaker 45: know that I remember
04:17:10 Speaker 45: I remember the 2012 report, and
04:17:11 Speaker 44: I remember there was two different
04:17:13 Speaker 44: values for acre per land or
04:17:14 Speaker 44: whatever. One was for the Blue
04:17:16 Speaker 44: Mountains, and then it was the
04:17:17 Speaker 44: rest of the municipality or the
04:17:21 Speaker 44: county. Now we've seen a lot
04:17:23 Speaker 44: of values change. One is farmland,
04:17:24 Speaker 44: like at most places, thirty thousand
04:17:25 Speaker 44: acre farmland or farmland back in
04:17:27 Speaker 44: 2012 was probably less than ten
04:17:30 Speaker 44: or or more. so that has
04:17:32 Speaker 44: changed something. And I don't know,
04:17:33 Speaker 44: getting into details if you have.
04:17:35 Speaker 44: So you you still use an
04:17:36 Speaker 44: appraiser. Because the land value of
04:17:37 Speaker 44: the county is probably different than
04:17:39 Speaker 44: 2012, and it's probably all over
04:17:44 Speaker 44: the place. So I know you
04:17:48 Speaker 44: try to come, and I know
04:17:50 Speaker 44: a lot of times it's the
04:17:53 Speaker 44: appraiser that tries to get you
04:17:56 Speaker 42: that value. But I know it's,
04:17:58 Speaker 42: and sometimes if it's a small
04:18:01 Speaker 42: piece, you take whatever it is
04:18:02 Speaker 42: per acre divided by square footage,
04:18:05 Speaker 42: and you try to come up
04:18:07 Speaker 42: with that number. Not if you
04:18:12 Speaker 42: have anything to add to that.
04:18:13 Speaker 42: Oops, sorry. Thank you for the
04:18:15 Speaker 42: question. So I I agree with
04:18:17 Speaker 42: you that it is difficult to
04:18:21 Speaker 42: narrow down a specific base price
04:18:23 Speaker 42: that applies across the county. We
04:18:26 Speaker 42: did try to do that, and
04:18:29 Speaker 42: that's part of the reason it
04:18:31 Speaker 42: took so long to get this
04:18:34 Speaker 42: report back is that we couldn't.
04:18:37 Speaker 42: So with Schedule A, it's for
04:18:42 Speaker 42: those smaller pieces for row purposes
04:18:43 Speaker 42: where we have set a compensation
04:18:46 Speaker 44: rate in there, but that's why
04:18:47 Speaker 44: we have also added the staff.
04:18:50 Speaker 44: valuation method because we recognize, like
04:18:53 Speaker 44: our friends in Blue Mountains, their
04:18:55 Speaker 44: land values may differ. So the
04:18:57 Speaker 44: the base compensation rate that's included
04:18:59 Speaker 44: in Schedule A may not always
04:19:01 Speaker 44: be appropriate. So by adding that
04:19:03 Speaker 44: staff valuation method, it gives transportation
04:19:04 Speaker 44: a bit more freedom to be
04:19:09 Speaker 44: able to negotiate up to that
04:19:14 Speaker 44: seventy five thousand. But of course,
04:19:16 Speaker 44: if if we don't have the
04:19:18 Speaker 15: comparators, or if we decide that
04:19:19 Speaker 15: it's over the seventy five, then
04:19:21 Speaker 15: we would be looking at. getting
04:19:23 Speaker 15: appraisers or looking at different valuation
04:19:24 Speaker 15: methods. Just an example, you could
04:19:26 Speaker 15: be road widening a section of
04:19:28 Speaker 15: of a county road that hasn't
04:19:29 Speaker 15: had the road widening, and you'd
04:19:31 Speaker 15: be going along all those farms.
04:19:34 Speaker 15: And if they're valued at thirty
04:19:35 Speaker 15: thousand an acre, you may have
04:19:36 Speaker 15: the it may be much different
04:19:39 Speaker 15: today than it would have been
04:19:41 Speaker 15: a long time ago, just because
04:19:43 Speaker 15: of those land values and the
04:19:45 Speaker 15: loss of land as well. If
04:19:48 Speaker 15: you're road widening, you're taking seventeen
04:19:50 Speaker 15: feet, people from sixty-six to hundred
04:19:52 Speaker 15: hundred feet, right? That adds up.
04:19:54 Speaker 15: So, yeah, thank you. Okay. Other
04:19:56 Speaker 15: questions, comments? Okay. We'll go to
04:19:58 Speaker 15: Councillor Eccles. Just quickly, you mentioned
8 Closed Meeting Matters
Council moved to enter closed session to discuss labour relations for OPSU at Gray Gables and Lee Manor, plus land sale negotiation criteria.
04:20:01 Speaker 15: the seventy-five thousand, but in that seventy-five thousand, if it does go above the seventy-five thousand, you still don't need to go with that, unless there's another exemption someplace. I'm just kind of lost. Is it 75? That's the cutoff point, but it's not the cutoff point. The way this reads right now, am I interpreting that right? So the intention would be that if we're using the staff valuation method, we would only be using that if the land is under 75,000. If it's over 75, then we'd be looking at different valuation methods. So I'm misinterpreting that. because in here it says anything over seventy-five thousand it would be a different unless it qualifies for another for a different exemption. So you're telling me anything over no, got to go with the valuation. But the way this reads, it says no. If there's another exemption, then we can keep going the way we are over seventy-five. That's my that's where I want clarity. Thank you, and I think there's. a blanket. If there's any exemptions that apply to the broad policy, so an example might be if it's a disposition or acquisition between municipalities, that kind of thing, where the value might be over, but there might be an exemption otherwise, where we don't actually need to get this property valued because it's between municipalities. So, if there is an exemption where it's not needing to be valued, that kind of thing would be an exemption that would hit if it was potentially over seventy-five thousand. is so there is that broader exemption. If you can find an exemption in this policy, then might not need to get it valued. But if we're using the staff value method because we need a valuation, then we'd be using that for under seventy-five. Okay. Did I see Councillor Craig? My question was is really just ensuring that staff still have flexibility. Agriculture is easy to to utilise as an example. because it's most prevalent. But if you are working at sight lines at an intersection expansion, for instance, and there's a slightly treed lot or or scrub brush, the policy here allows the county to still dig in and be like, "Yeah, that has been scrub brush or treed for 50 years. You've never treated as ag land, which is more valuable," and then pumps. the price up. Do we still have that supreme discretion to be, or hazard lands, or some sort of more passive use than a higher value assessment, such as agriculture? Thank you for the question. And the intent is to still allow flexibility. In specific examples, we'd be looking at each on a case-by-case basis. So if there are complicating things, I don't know that we. would be doing a staff value ourselves, and it might be more where we get an appraiser to get that type type of an opinion. But that would just be something that we look at on a case by case basis. Okay. Other questions? Okay, I'm not seeing any further questions here. So let's look at the close going into close session, and then we will conclude with a vote on this matter. so it's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to Section Two Thirty Nine Two of the Municipal Act Two Thousand and One as amended to discuss Number One Labour Relations or Employee Negotiations, and this is with regards to OPSU for Gray Gables and Lee Manor, and Number Two a Position Plan Procedure Criteria or Instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board with. regards to land sale and acquisition negotiations. May I ask for a mover and a seconder? Moved by Councillor Patterson, seconded by Councillor Hutchinson. We'll take all those in favour.
Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.