Grey County Committee of the Whole Meeting Transcript — August 13, 2026

Hook: 175000 Sogin Hospice Facility Budget

Grey County · Committee of the Whole · August 13, 2026

Summary

The Committee of the Whole convened to process consent items and advance several substantive reports on budgetary requests, service delivery plans, and community infrastructure initiatives before adjourning. Key discussions focused on emergency response protocols, housing support funding, and the financial implications of expanding healthcare services in rural areas.

Top Newsworthy Developments

Key Topics & Sections

Meeting Details

Jurisdiction
Grey County
Body
Committee of the Whole
Date
August 13, 2026
Transcript Status
Machine transcription, lightly cleaned
Official Source
View official meeting page
Agenda Page
View agenda page
Original Video
View original meeting video
Meeting Portal
View eScribe meeting page

Related Discussion

HelpOS discussion thread link pending.

Transcript Notice

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain errors in wording, speaker identification, punctuation, or timestamps.

It is an unofficial convenience copy provided for reading and searchability.

For the official record, refer to the original source materials published by the relevant authority, including the official video, agenda, minutes, and meeting records.

Official meeting source · Official video / recording

Full Transcript

Jump to transcript

1 Call to Order

The committee called to order on August 13, 2026, with no declarations of interest raised. Discussion regarding the consent agenda identified specific items for separate consideration before proceeding. A motion was moved to receive the remaining consent agenda items and authorise staff actions accordingly. The motion was seconded and carried without further discussion. The committee then adjourned briefly before reconvening later in the day.

01:06:42 Speaker 02: so I'd like to call to

01:06:44 Speaker 02: order this committee the whole. of

01:06:46 Speaker 02: August thirteenth, twenty twenty-six. At this

01:06:47 Speaker 02: point in time, I'll put out

01:06:49 Speaker 02: a call if there are any

01:06:51 Speaker 02: declarations of interest. Seeing no hands

01:06:54 Speaker 02: raised, we'll move on. Business arising

01:06:55 Speaker 02: from minutes, we have healthy discussion

01:06:57 Speaker 02: on minutes. Delegations, we do not

01:07:00 Speaker 02: have any today, and so we'll

01:07:03 Speaker 02: go to item five: determination of

01:07:06 Speaker 02: items requiring separate discussion. On the

01:07:08 Speaker 02: consent agenda listed in six, we

01:07:09 Speaker 02: have seven different items listed. So

01:07:11 Speaker 02: I'll ask if you. could identify

01:07:13 Speaker 02: any items you wish to have

01:07:14 Speaker 02: a separate discussion for, Councillor Gregg.

01:07:15 Speaker 02: Six C, just for a point

01:09:49 Speaker 03: of a question. Thanks. So, question

01:13:37 Speaker 03: for six C, so we'll pull

01:19:33 Speaker 03: that one separately. Anything else, Councillor

01:19:34 Speaker 01: McQueen? Thank you, Madam Warden. Yes,

01:19:35 Speaker 01: six F. Okay, six F. Anything

01:19:53 Speaker 01: else? Okay, I'm not seeing any

01:19:55 Speaker 01: further hands. Therefore, we'll just tidy

01:19:57 Speaker 03: up then the consent agenda. It's

01:19:59 Speaker 02: recommended that the following consent agenda

01:20:02 Speaker 02: items be received, and that staff

01:20:03 Speaker 02: be authorised to take actions necessary

01:20:05 Speaker 02: to give effect to the recommendations

01:20:07 Speaker 02: in the staff reports, and that

01:20:10 Speaker 02: the correspondence be supported or received

01:20:12 Speaker 02: for information as recommended in the

01:20:15 Speaker 02: consent agenda. It will be all

01:20:16 Speaker 02: items less item 6C, as in

01:20:18 Speaker 02: cat, and F, as in frog.

01:20:20 Speaker 02: May I ask for a mover

01:20:22 Speaker 02: to secondeer? Move by. Moved by

01:20:23 Speaker 02: Councillor Eccles, seconded by Councillor Mackie.

01:20:25 Speaker 02: Any discussion? All those in favour?

01:20:26 Speaker 02: And that motion is carried. Thank

01:20:28 Speaker 02: you. So let's take a break

01:20:29 Speaker 02: now until eleven ten, and then

01:20:32 Speaker 02: we'll carry on with the remainder

01:20:34 Speaker 02: of our agenda in the morning

01:20:37 Speaker 02: and see where we are by

01:20:41 Speaker 02: twelve fifteen. Okay. Could I please

01:20:43 Speaker 02: invite all of our committee, the

01:20:47 Speaker 24: whole members, back to the horseshoe?

01:20:50 Speaker 24: Okay, so we are reconvening after

01:20:52 Speaker 24: our break, and we are at

7.a Community Services Committee minutes dated August 6, 2026

The Community Services Committee reviewed minutes recommending the adoption of a new systems planning analyst position to address provincial IT modernization mandates and childcare compliance requirements. The committee also discussed Canada Ontario Community Housing initiatives, including a requirement to build 15 new units and expand rent supplements to 12 total.

01:20:55 Speaker 24: item seven A, and this is

01:20:57 Speaker 24: with regards to Community Services

01:21:00 Speaker 24: Committee minutes. And in a

01:21:03 Speaker 24: moment, we'll call up Director Shaw

01:21:04 Speaker 24: to speak to that. So it's

01:21:06 Speaker 24: recommended that the Community Services Committee

01:21:09 Speaker 24: minutes dated August six, twenty twenty

01:21:11 Speaker 24: six, be adopted as presented, and

01:21:14 Speaker 24: that the following resolutions contained therein

01:21:15 Speaker 24: be endorsed. There are a number

01:21:17 Speaker 24: of them that have been. outlined

01:21:19 Speaker 24: and highlighted here in the circulated

01:21:20 Speaker 24: agenda that's been made public and

01:21:23 Speaker 24: circulated to all committee, the whole

01:21:25 Speaker 24: members. So at this point in

01:21:27 Speaker 24: time, I will look for a

01:21:32 Speaker 24: mover and a seconder. We've got

01:21:33 Speaker 24: a move by Councillor Hutchison, seconded

01:21:35 Speaker 24: by Councillor Doreen. So it's now

01:21:38 Speaker 24: on the floor for discussion. Welcome,

01:21:40 Speaker 24: Director Shaw. Thank you, Madam Warden,

01:21:41 Speaker 24: and good morning, County Council. Starting

01:21:43 Speaker 24: off with the first recommendation, it

01:21:46 Speaker 24: is our community service Our community

01:21:49 Speaker 24: services systems planning and compliance analyst

01:21:51 Speaker 24: position. The Ministry of Education has

01:21:54 Speaker 24: a provincially mandated modernization initiatives over

01:21:57 Speaker 24: the next five years. They're looking

01:22:00 Speaker 24: at increasing requirements for IT modernization,

01:22:03 Speaker 24: data management, compliance monitoring, and performance

01:22:04 Speaker 24: measures. This is actually a really

01:22:07 Speaker 24: good news story. We do not

01:22:09 Speaker 24: have a centralized wait list for

01:22:11 Speaker 24: childcare in anywhere in the

01:22:13 Speaker 24: province, and so right now, majority

01:22:16 Speaker 24: of people that are looking for

01:22:18 Speaker 24: childcare would have to put an

01:22:21 Speaker 24: application into all of the existing

01:22:22 Speaker 24: childcare centres out there, rather than

01:22:25 Speaker 24: having one centralized area to do

01:22:29 Speaker 24: it. There are many other options

01:22:31 Speaker 24: when it comes to early on

01:22:33 Speaker 24: programmemes standardizing, taking, scanning people in

01:22:35 Speaker 24: and out of the programmemes. So

01:22:37 Speaker 24: there's a lot of that other

01:22:39 Speaker 24: security and safety aspects of it.

01:22:41 Speaker 24: The province is looking at this

01:22:43 Speaker 24: taking about three to five years,

01:22:45 Speaker 24: and there are five different phases.

01:22:48 Speaker 24: The first phase is starting this

01:22:50 Speaker 24: September and will continue on until

01:22:53 Speaker 24: September of 2027. And that is

01:22:54 Speaker 24: again modernizing our early on. We

01:22:56 Speaker 24: are looking at a position in

01:22:58 Speaker 24: order to do this. The position

01:23:00 Speaker 24: itself is proposed to to also

01:23:04 Speaker 24: expand to all of our services

01:23:05 Speaker 24: and community services. So, for instance,

01:23:07 Speaker 24: in 2027, we're going to have

01:23:09 Speaker 24: a review under the MMNH. So,

01:23:11 Speaker 24: I'm sure there's going to be

01:23:15 Speaker 24: modernization recommendations coming from that, and

01:23:18 Speaker 24: also our housing and homelessness plan.

01:23:23 Speaker 24: So developing and dashboards and having

01:23:24 Speaker 24: a way of us to report

01:23:26 Speaker 24: on a number of our initiatives.

01:23:27 Speaker 24: Along with this comes increased data

01:23:29 Speaker 24: collection from the province, and as

01:23:31 Speaker 24: part of the C. Well programme,

01:23:32 Speaker 24: we are at now asking our

01:23:34 Speaker 24: childcare centres to put together business

01:23:36 Speaker 24: plans and do a lot of

01:23:38 Speaker 24: financial work and audit. Financial work

01:23:39 Speaker 24: and auditing that didn't happen in

01:23:40 Speaker 24: the past, and this position will

01:23:46 Speaker 24: also help some of our smaller

01:23:48 Speaker 24: smaller centres in order to meet

01:23:51 Speaker 24: those regulatory requirements now from from

01:23:53 Speaker 02: the province. The funding we did

01:23:54 Speaker 02: receive funding from the Ministry of

01:23:55 Speaker 02: Education in order to assist with

01:23:59 Speaker 02: that. We received forty six thousand

01:24:01 Speaker 02: dollars for two thousand and twenty

01:24:03 Speaker 02: six, but that is prorated.

01:24:07 Speaker 24: There will be a different amount

01:24:09 Speaker 24: coming for twenty twenty seven, and

01:24:14 Speaker 24: we also received some additional funding.

01:24:17 Speaker 24: Some additional funds in early on

01:24:19 Speaker 24: for next year, also as administrative

01:24:20 Speaker 24: funds. The position itself will be

01:24:24 Speaker 24: looking at salary, benefits, supplies, materials,

01:24:26 Speaker 24: travel, a computer, cell phone, all

01:24:30 Speaker 24: of that around the hundred

01:24:32 Speaker 24: and fifty thousand dollars. So there

01:24:34 Speaker 24: are no levy dollars at this

01:24:36 Speaker 24: point going into it. And if

01:24:38 Speaker 24: at some time in the next

01:24:39 Speaker 24: five years it is required, we

01:24:41 Speaker 24: do have mitigation funds that we

01:24:43 Speaker 24: could use for that. And I'm

01:24:45 Speaker 24: happy to answer. questions about that.

01:24:47 Speaker 24: Or would you like me to

01:24:50 Speaker 24: continue with them all, Madam Warden?

01:24:53 Speaker 24: Let me see. Why don't we

01:24:55 Speaker 24: let's try to contain our discussion.

01:24:57 Speaker 24: So let's go ahead and just

01:24:58 Speaker 24: present everything, and we'll just we'll

01:25:01 Speaker 24: zero back to what it is

01:25:04 Speaker 24: people would like to talk to.

01:25:05 Speaker 24: Thank you. Thank you. So the

01:25:08 Speaker 24: next one on the list is

01:25:09 Speaker 24: our Canada Ontario Community Housing Initiatives

01:25:11 Speaker 24: in Ontario. priorities, housing initiatives, investment

01:25:14 Speaker 24: plans. These are 100% provincial funded.

01:25:15 Speaker 24: We did receive our allocation for

01:25:18 Speaker 24: this year. Normally, we do have

01:25:21 Speaker 24: it before budget, but this year

01:25:23 Speaker 24: and last year, we did not.

01:25:25 Speaker 24: These funds are to protect the

01:25:27 Speaker 24: long-term viability of community housing by

01:25:28 Speaker 24: supporting ongoing repairs, supporting end-of-operating agreements,

01:25:31 Speaker 24: and expanding the stock. We normally

01:25:32 Speaker 24: work. with our nonprofits with these

01:25:33 Speaker 24: funds too, in order to provide

01:25:37 Speaker 24: any capital repair funds that might

01:25:40 Speaker 24: be available to them. As part

01:25:42 Speaker 24: of the national housing strategy, we

01:25:46 Speaker 24: also have a requirement of fifteen

01:25:48 Speaker 24: new units in order to meet

01:25:50 Speaker 24: the funding requirements for the province.

01:25:52 Speaker 24: We are proposing to keep our

01:25:55 Speaker 24: rent supplement programme going. Right now,

01:25:57 Speaker 24: we have forty-five rent supplements that

01:25:58 Speaker 24: we provide, and we're going to

01:26:01 Speaker 24: add two new rent or twelve

01:26:03 Speaker 24: new rent supplements as a total.

01:26:06 Speaker 24: towards that fifteen, we're looking at

01:26:10 Speaker 24: five hundred thousand dollars towards our

01:26:12 Speaker 24: capital build in Dundalk, and that

01:26:14 Speaker 24: would provide for three new units.

01:26:16 Speaker 24: And of course, our community housing

01:26:17 Speaker 24: repairs funds at about three hundred

01:26:18 Speaker 24: and thirteen, and those would go

01:26:20 Speaker 24: towards funding needs in ourselves, emergency

01:26:23 Speaker 24: funding needs, or funding needs for

01:26:24 Speaker 24: our nonprofits. Part of our priority

01:26:26 Speaker 24: housing would be our rental supplements

01:26:28 Speaker 24: again, and we also put a

01:26:30 Speaker 24: ten percent allocation to be used

01:26:32 Speaker 24: towards support services. ten percent is

01:26:35 Speaker 24: the highest that we can go

01:26:36 Speaker 24: according to that fund. Our next

01:26:40 Speaker 24: item is Gariffraxa Nonprofit Homes. These

01:26:41 Speaker 24: are one of our nine nonprofits

01:26:42 Speaker 15: that we support. So through the

01:26:44 Speaker 15: Housing Services Act, we have a

01:26:45 Speaker 15: number of not for profits that

01:26:46 Speaker 15: the county supports, and these are

01:26:48 Speaker 15: one of them. They had a

01:26:53 Speaker 15: sinkhole in their parking lot as

01:26:59 Speaker 15: part of all that rain we

01:27:02 Speaker 25: had back in April, and there

01:27:04 Speaker 25: were needs repair needs for the

01:27:07 Speaker 25: retaining wall and also for the

01:27:12 Speaker 17: driveway itself. The we the repairs

01:27:13 Speaker 17: are costing two hundred and seventy

01:27:15 Speaker 17: five thousand dollars. They do have

01:27:19 Speaker 17: some funds available, but they also

01:27:22 Speaker 17: have other capital needs that are

01:27:25 Speaker 17: coming up. So they approached the

01:27:27 Speaker 17: county to see if we could

01:27:29 Speaker 17: provide any extra or any funding

01:27:33 Speaker 17: towards it. We proposed one hundred

01:27:38 Speaker 17: and twenty five thousand dollars. We

01:27:40 Speaker 17: have seventy five thousand dollars that

01:27:41 Speaker 17: we're going to. use from our

01:27:44 Speaker 17: nonprofit housing general reserve and fifty

01:27:46 Speaker 17: thousand dollars from the Cochi initiatives

01:27:49 Speaker 26: that I just talked about. And

01:27:49 Speaker 26: I'm happy to answer any questions.

01:27:51 Speaker 26: Okay, thank you. So I'll put

01:27:54 Speaker 26: it out. If there are any

01:27:56 Speaker 26: questions from members of the committee,

01:27:59 Speaker 26: the whole, perhaps you can refer

01:28:01 Speaker 26: to if it's item one, two,

01:28:02 Speaker 26: or three to help clarify, and

01:28:04 Speaker 26: then we'll look into that. Any

01:28:08 Speaker 26: questions? Okay, we'll begin with Councillor

01:28:10 Speaker 26: Ackles. And through you, Madam Warden,

01:28:11 Speaker 26: and probably to Terret, has really

01:28:12 Speaker 26: nothing to do with your report

01:28:17 Speaker 26: whatsoever, Emery. It has to do

01:28:22 Speaker 26: with just procedural. I noticed at

01:28:25 Speaker 26: the end of the meeting, the

01:28:27 Speaker 22: meeting was adjourned by Councillor Debrine,

01:28:29 Speaker 22: made the motion, and the chair

01:28:31 Speaker 22: seconded the motion. Procedurally, can the

01:28:32 Speaker 22: chair move and second? The chair

01:28:41 Speaker 22: move in second motions, and that's

01:28:43 Speaker 22: why I'm looking towards Tara and

01:28:45 Speaker 22: Marie, not you. Okay, I'll look

01:28:48 Speaker 22: to Madam Clerk. Thank you, and

01:28:49 Speaker 22: through you, Madam Warden. I do

01:28:51 Speaker 22: not know the answer to that

01:28:55 Speaker 27: offhand. It's certainly something that I

01:28:57 Speaker 27: can look into. I did glance

01:29:03 Speaker 27: our procedural bylaw, and it's it

01:29:07 Speaker 27: doesn't speak to that. So I

01:29:08 Speaker 27: think the answer is probably somewhere

01:29:10 Speaker 15: in Roberts' Rules of Order. I

01:29:11 Speaker 15: know. that our procedure bylaw, though

01:29:14 Speaker 15: it doesn't speak to it, some

01:29:17 Speaker 15: municipalities, the chair, I believe, their

01:29:18 Speaker 15: procedure bylaw allows for the chair

01:29:20 Speaker 15: to adjourn meetings, but it is

01:29:21 Speaker 15: unclear to me what proper protocol

01:29:23 Speaker 15: would be in our in our

01:29:26 Speaker 15: circumstances. So I can certainly look

01:29:30 Speaker 15: into that. I think we we

01:29:33 Speaker 15: would have fun looking into that

01:29:35 Speaker 15: for you. Okay, thank you, Councillor

01:29:40 Speaker 15: Nielsen. Thank you for. Thank you

01:29:42 Speaker 15: very much, Word Microsoft, to Councillor

01:29:43 Speaker 15: Eccles. If my motion to adjourn

01:29:44 Speaker 15: was incorrect, I apologize for the

01:29:46 Speaker 15: world record of the longest Community

01:29:48 Speaker 15: Services Committee, as it is still

01:29:51 Speaker 15: currently running. Thank you. Anything else,

01:29:53 Speaker 15: Councillor McQueen? I just to follow

01:29:54 Speaker 15: up to the question. I know

01:29:57 Speaker 28: with procedure, I know with our

01:29:58 Speaker 28: grey hands, we allow the chair

01:30:00 Speaker 28: to second, but one. To second,

01:30:02 Speaker 28: but won't allow the chair to

01:30:21 Speaker 28: move. So you may be the

01:30:23 Speaker 28: meeting may be over. Thank you.

01:30:26 Speaker 29: Okay, so if there's no further

01:30:33 Speaker 28: discussion or questions for Director Shaw,

01:30:36 Speaker 28: I'll call the question. Then all

01:30:37 Speaker 28: those in favour, that motion is

01:30:39 Speaker 28: carried. Thank you very much, Director

01:30:40 Speaker 28: Shaw. Okay, so we're going to

01:30:42 Speaker 28: move on now to item seven

01:30:43 Speaker 28: B, and in fact, we're going

01:30:46 Speaker 28: to in. 7B, C, and D,

01:30:47 Speaker 28: we're going to see a lot

01:30:52 Speaker 28: of Director McNabb. So let's get

01:30:54 Speaker 28: started on on this part here.

7.b PSR-CW-04-26 Response Time Plan for 2027

The Council considers a proposal to approve and submit the 2027 response time performance plan to the relevant ministry. Staff present historical data showing consistent adherence to established targets for emergency scene arrival times. A comprehensive review of call volumes and operational frameworks is underway to ensure future standards remain effective. The committee acknowledges upcoming updates regarding triage tools and potential shifts in regulatory definitions for rural and remote areas. Discussion focuses on maintaining current performance metrics while adapting to projected increases in demand over the next decade. The body agrees to proceed with submitting the existing plan pending further analysis of long-term population growth trends.

01:30:56 Speaker 28: The first one is item 7B.

01:31:00 Speaker 28: It's recommended that the 2027 response

01:31:01 Speaker 28: time performance plan, as outlined in

01:31:04 Speaker 28: the report PSRCW0426, be approved and

01:31:07 Speaker 28: submitted to the Ministry of Health.

01:31:09 Speaker 28: May I ask for a mover

01:31:11 Speaker 28: and a second? Move by Councillor

01:31:15 Speaker 28: Nielsen, second by Councillor Eccles. It's

01:31:16 Speaker 28: now on the floor for discussion.

01:31:18 Speaker 28: Welcome. Director McCloud. Good morning, Warden

01:31:19 Speaker 28: County Council. I did bring a

01:31:21 Speaker 28: friend, and I'll introduce Jessica when

01:31:24 Speaker 28: she comes up here. But, anyways,

01:31:26 Speaker 28: knowing that I have three reports,

01:31:28 Speaker 28: so I'll try to keep them

01:31:30 Speaker 28: short. That I might be before

01:31:32 Speaker 28: lunch. So. Okay, so each year

01:31:34 Speaker 28: we have to develop a response

01:31:35 Speaker 28: time plan for the upcoming year,

01:31:38 Speaker 28: and yeah, sorry. Have a response

01:31:41 Speaker 28: time. Oh, okay. Each year we

01:31:42 Speaker 28: have to develop a response time

01:31:45 Speaker 28: performance plan prior to October first,

01:31:46 Speaker 28: and then submit it to the

01:31:49 Speaker 28: ministry prior to the end of

01:31:50 Speaker 28: October. This plan is to cover

01:31:53 Speaker 28: the twenty twenty seven year. To

01:31:55 Speaker 28: cover the 2027 year, and in

01:31:58 Speaker 28: March of next year, we'll report

01:32:00 Speaker 28: on the response times from 2026.

01:32:01 Speaker 28: So this chart it lays out

01:32:03 Speaker 28: our response time plan. It also

01:32:05 Speaker 28: gives you what the 2025 response

01:32:07 Speaker 28: time performance was, and then also

01:32:11 Speaker 28: up till June 2026 or June

01:32:13 Speaker 28: 30th, 2026, and then also our

01:32:15 Speaker 28: our five year average. The response

01:32:17 Speaker 28: times that we have were developed

01:32:19 Speaker 28: back in 2012 when this new

01:32:24 Speaker 28: response time framework was first implemented,

01:32:25 Speaker 28: and the times were took from

01:32:27 Speaker 28: how we were achieving goals at

01:32:29 Speaker 28: that point, we haven't changed the

01:32:31 Speaker 28: response times other than in 2017.

01:32:32 Speaker 28: We improved upon the CTS one

01:32:34 Speaker 28: response time from 50 percent to

01:32:37 Speaker 28: 60 percent, and we also moved

01:32:40 Speaker 28: the CTS three, four, and five

01:32:42 Speaker 28: from 30 minutes down to 20

01:32:44 Speaker 28: minutes. So we've improved upon those

01:32:46 Speaker 28: response times. Sudden cardiac arrest is

01:32:49 Speaker 28: six minutes or less, and we

01:32:51 Speaker 28: as a miss. And we, as

01:32:53 Speaker 28: a municipality, can set the percentage.

01:32:54 Speaker 28: C task one is set at

01:32:55 Speaker 28: eight minutes, and we, as municipality,

01:32:57 Speaker 28: can set the percentage of how

01:32:58 Speaker 28: often we are able to achieve

01:33:00 Speaker 28: that goal. C tasks two, three,

01:33:01 Speaker 28: four, and five, the municipality can

01:33:02 Speaker 28: set the response time as well

01:33:03 Speaker 28: as the percentage. So, if you

01:33:04 Speaker 28: can see our targets, it's forty

01:33:05 Speaker 28: percent of the time for cardiac

01:33:06 Speaker 28: arrest in six minutes or less.

01:33:07 Speaker 28: For C task one, it's eight

01:33:09 Speaker 28: minutes, sixty percent. and then C

01:33:11 Speaker 28: test two is fifteen minutes at

01:33:13 Speaker 28: ninety percent, and then C test

01:33:15 Speaker 28: three, four, and five are all

01:33:17 Speaker 28: at ninety percent for twenty minutes.

01:33:20 Speaker 28: Just to give you an idea

01:33:21 Speaker 28: about also how we look at

01:33:22 Speaker 28: calls, we also look at just

01:33:24 Speaker 28: all call floors together as opposed

01:33:26 Speaker 28: to breaking up by C test,

01:33:27 Speaker 28: and you can see we were

01:33:28 Speaker 28: in that fifteen minute range for

01:33:29 Speaker 28: quite some time, fifteen, thirty-two, and

01:33:31 Speaker 28: in twenty, twenty-five, and. in 2025

01:33:36 Speaker 28: and 1540 this year, and this

01:33:37 Speaker 28: this has been around 15 minutes

01:33:38 Speaker 28: since back almost back to 1996

01:33:41 Speaker 28: when the last response time standard

01:33:44 Speaker 28: was. We measure by 90th percentile

01:33:47 Speaker 28: because that gives us under normal

01:33:51 Speaker 28: usage what time you can expect

01:33:53 Speaker 28: the ambulance to get to the

01:33:56 Speaker 28: scene nine times out of ten

01:33:59 Speaker 28: in the county, and that's from

01:34:00 Speaker 28: the time the pager goes off

01:34:01 Speaker 28: until the time we arrive at

01:34:03 Speaker 28: the scene. So if you look

01:34:04 Speaker 28: at that, if you build in

01:34:06 Speaker 28: a shoot time of when the

01:34:07 Speaker 28: pager goes off in the base,

01:34:08 Speaker 28: it takes you a minute minute

01:34:09 Speaker 28: half to get in the truck

01:34:11 Speaker 28: and. figure out where you're going.

01:34:13 Speaker 28: Nine times out of ten, in

01:34:15 Speaker 28: gray so far this year, we're

01:34:17 Speaker 28: at the scene 15 minutes and

01:34:20 Speaker 28: 40 seconds. Nine times out of

01:34:22 Speaker 28: ten, we also look at average

01:34:25 Speaker 28: response times. Doesn't really tell you

01:34:27 Speaker 28: a lot, like as far as

01:34:29 Speaker 28: like because there's lots of two

01:34:31 Speaker 28: minute response times and maybe 28

01:34:34 Speaker 28: minute response times, but it's just

01:34:35 Speaker 28: a good gauge that we keep

01:34:36 Speaker 28: an eye on average to see

01:34:37 Speaker 28: if that's going up or down,

01:34:43 Speaker 28: and it's typically in this seven

01:34:44 Speaker 28: minute range. So. if approved, this

01:34:47 Speaker 28: will be what will be submitted

01:34:48 Speaker 28: to the ministry this year. Again,

01:34:51 Speaker 28: everything will remain the same, but

01:34:53 Speaker 28: that'll be submitted in, and then

01:34:55 Speaker 28: it'll be published for for people

01:34:58 Speaker 28: to see. Just in regards to

01:35:02 Speaker 28: call volume, this year so far,

01:35:04 Speaker 28: up until June, we've seen a

01:35:06 Speaker 28: three percent increase in call volume.

01:35:08 Speaker 28: If you look at last year,

01:35:13 Speaker 28: we had almost a nine percent

01:35:14 Speaker 28: increase in call volume last year,

01:35:15 Speaker 28: and that's. why it's important not

01:35:17 Speaker 28: to just look one year at

01:35:18 Speaker 28: a time. You have to look

01:35:21 Speaker 28: at over periods of five years

01:35:23 Speaker 28: and ten years to see. And

01:35:27 Speaker 28: if you see below the last

01:35:29 Speaker 28: bullet over the last five years,

01:35:30 Speaker 28: a forty-three percent increase in call

01:35:33 Speaker 28: volume, and the last five years,

01:35:35 Speaker 28: we're looking about averaging about a

01:35:41 Speaker 28: six point six percent per year.

01:35:42 Speaker 28: The OREH study, they're looking predicting

01:35:44 Speaker 28: about five point eight percent over

01:35:49 Speaker 28: the next ten years, beginning in

01:35:51 Speaker 28: twenty twenty three. So it's fairly

01:35:53 Speaker 28: close to what they're predicting, but

01:35:55 Speaker 28: there are times where you see

01:35:57 Speaker 28: a one percent and then you

01:35:59 Speaker 28: see a nine percent, and they

01:36:00 Speaker 28: kind of just average out. So

01:36:02 Speaker 28: we are doing a comprehensive deployment

01:36:04 Speaker 28: review update. This will be a

01:36:07 Speaker 28: check-in. We're just below the midway

01:36:09 Speaker 28: point of the plan, and the

01:36:10 Speaker 28: results of that review will be

01:36:12 Speaker 28: coming out later this year. We're

01:36:15 Speaker 28: looking at call volumes, predicted call

01:36:16 Speaker 28: volumes, response times. asking questions about

01:36:17 Speaker 28: you know looking at population growth

01:36:19 Speaker 28: to see if it's remained the

01:36:22 Speaker 28: same, looking at our bases, the

01:36:24 Speaker 28: the locations, shift patterns, staffing, and

01:36:26 Speaker 28: just kind of comparing it to

01:36:29 Speaker 28: what we have in place right

01:36:31 Speaker 28: now to make sure it's on

01:36:33 Speaker 28: track to be able to meet

01:36:36 Speaker 28: that our our intention of maintaining

01:36:37 Speaker 28: those response times in around that

01:36:40 Speaker 28: fifteen minutes for code four calls.

01:36:44 Speaker 28: So these the respect the results

01:36:48 Speaker 28: of though that. The results of

01:36:50 Speaker 28: the that review will end up

01:36:53 Speaker 15: coming forward later this year in

01:36:54 Speaker 15: 2026 to be able to present

01:36:55 Speaker 15: to receive. Also happening, and Jessica

01:36:57 Speaker 15: will talk about this in a

01:36:59 Speaker 15: minute. There's a new triage tool.

01:37:02 Speaker 15: The current triage tool is kind

01:37:04 Speaker 15: of it's more I'd say outdated

01:37:06 Speaker 15: now. This is a new tool

01:37:08 Speaker 15: that will allow better prioritization of

01:37:10 Speaker 15: calls. And again, I'll let Jessica

01:37:14 Speaker 15: talk. And again, I'll let Cheska

01:37:15 Speaker 15: talk about that. But we look

01:37:16 Speaker 30: forward to that to help again

01:37:19 Speaker 30: with our more immediate threats and

01:37:22 Speaker 30: life-threatening calls. It'll it'll really aid

01:37:24 Speaker 30: with it. Also happening right now

01:37:26 Speaker 30: is we've been talking about this

01:37:28 Speaker 30: for a little over a year

01:37:30 Speaker 30: now. They are relooking at the

01:37:31 Speaker 30: response time standard. In November of

01:37:33 Speaker 30: 25, they took it out of

01:37:36 Speaker 30: the regulation and brought it into

01:37:38 Speaker 30: a standard, and they've kept the

01:37:40 Speaker 30: current framework. But most likely, what

01:37:49 Speaker 30: you'll see is a new framework

01:37:50 Speaker 30: that'll look more at a urban

01:37:52 Speaker 30: rural, and remote framework in response

01:37:55 Speaker 28: to Code Four calls, but that

01:37:57 Speaker 28: has not been finished yet. I

01:37:58 Speaker 28: have seen the the final. I'm

01:38:00 Speaker 28: fortunate to be on the committee,

01:38:01 Speaker 28: so hopefully that moves forward in

01:38:03 Speaker 28: the next year or so. No,

01:38:05 Speaker 28: taking questions. Okay, thank you. So

01:38:06 Speaker 28: we'll focus our questions on the

01:38:07 Speaker 28: response time performance plan. It being

7.c PSR-CW-06-26 MPDS (Medical Priority Dispatch System)

Council members questioned the Medical Priority Dispatch System regarding a 15-minute average response time in rural Ontario, where geography and rising call volumes create pinch points. Officials explained that resources are strategically matched to density using GIS teams to update maps for new developments, though private roads sometimes delay updates. Winter weather conditions like icy roads account for anomalies in the 10% of calls exceeding targets. Hospital offloading challenges increased after 2022 at Owen Sound and Collingwood, leading to ambulances waiting for beds, prompting requests for additional funding for offload duty nurses. The council approved the report on the Medical Priority Dispatch System. Council approved a transition to the Medical Priority Dispatch System that refines existing ambulance dispatch practices using colour-coded priorities instead of simple numbers. The new system allows lower priority calls to be held while higher priority emergencies are dispatched immediately, though paramedics noted this can still cause delays for non-immediate cases. Communication protocols ensure patients remain in contact with the dispatch centre until conditions change or a callback occurs.

01:38:10 Speaker 28: noted that item seven C will

01:38:11 Speaker 28: be a chance for. Item 7C

01:38:14 Speaker 28: will be a chance for us

01:38:17 Speaker 28: to ask more questions, both Director

01:38:19 Speaker 28: McNabb, but also our Deputy Chief

01:38:21 Speaker 28: of Paramedic Services for the Medical

01:38:24 Speaker 28: Priority Dispatch System. So let's save

01:38:25 Speaker 28: any questions on that until we

01:38:26 Speaker 28: get to Item 7C. But with

01:38:29 Speaker 28: regards to the performance plan, any

01:38:30 Speaker 28: questions, Deputy Warden? Thank you, Madam

01:38:32 Speaker 28: Warden, and thank you, Kevin, for

01:38:34 Speaker 28: that report. It's always interesting to

01:38:37 Speaker 28: see the numbers. You indicated that

01:38:38 Speaker 28: the the average response time is

01:38:48 Speaker 28: 15 minutes plus or minus for.

01:38:50 Speaker 28: Fifteen minutes plus or minus for

01:38:51 Speaker 31: thirty some odd years. Where's the

01:38:53 Speaker 31: pinch point on that one, and

01:38:54 Speaker 31: why is that not advancing, getting

01:38:55 Speaker 31: better? Is it just because physically

01:38:57 Speaker 31: we've got not enough people and

01:38:59 Speaker 31: too much geography, or or the

01:39:01 Speaker 31: the trucks don't levitate yet, or

01:39:03 Speaker 31: what? What is the real reason

01:39:04 Speaker 31: why that number just doesn't seem

01:39:06 Speaker 31: to move? Please. In in rural

01:39:07 Speaker 31: Ontario, I think the biggest thing

01:39:09 Speaker 31: that we face is. geography, as

01:39:12 Speaker 31: far as being able to respond,

01:39:14 Speaker 31: and we're talking nine times out

01:39:15 Speaker 31: of ten, or the ninetieth percentile.

01:39:16 Speaker 31: So it really gives you only

01:39:17 Speaker 31: ten percent of the calls that

01:39:19 Speaker 31: could be above above that time.

01:39:20 Speaker 31: And when you look at the

01:39:22 Speaker 31: mapping that we're doing around bases,

01:39:24 Speaker 31: and being able to spread out

01:39:25 Speaker 31: our resources, we're trying to tackle

01:39:26 Speaker 31: those areas to try to improve

01:39:28 Speaker 31: upon them. Recognizing also that those

01:39:30 Speaker 31: areas are lower density, lower call

01:39:34 Speaker 31: volume. So being able to find

01:39:35 Speaker 31: the best way. to match resources

01:39:39 Speaker 31: with density versus area, that's why

01:39:40 Speaker 31: we have to have R H

01:39:42 Speaker 31: to help guide us in that.

01:39:45 Speaker 31: But so I would say so.

01:39:48 Speaker 21: There's a combination here. One is

01:39:49 Speaker 21: the large geography of Gray County,

01:39:51 Speaker 21: and then it's also rising in

01:40:01 Speaker 21: call volumes. But both of those,

01:40:01 Speaker 21: I would say, are the major

01:40:04 Speaker 21: factors. Considering the size of our

01:40:06 Speaker 21: county. and being able to say

01:40:08 Speaker 28: that nine times out of ten

01:40:09 Speaker 28: that we're arriving, you know, in

01:40:12 Speaker 28: the drive time of thirteen and

01:40:14 Speaker 28: a half to fourteen minutes when

01:40:15 Speaker 28: you include shoot time, we're working

01:40:16 Speaker 28: pretty hard. Like we, we, we

01:40:19 Speaker 28: don't leave areas uncovered. You know,

01:40:21 Speaker 28: we move multiple standbys to be

01:40:22 Speaker 28: able to cover those areas off

01:40:23 Speaker 28: to split differences. There's a lot

01:40:25 Speaker 28: of work that goes in the

01:40:27 Speaker 28: background. The call that's just happened,

01:40:29 Speaker 28: you know, we know what resources

01:40:31 Speaker 28: are going, what's needed, but nobody

01:40:32 Speaker 28: really sees the planning that goes

01:40:36 Speaker 28: in the background to say, well,

01:40:38 Speaker 28: what happens with the next call.

01:40:39 Speaker 28: To say, well, what happens when

01:40:42 Speaker 28: the next call happens? We're trying

01:40:44 Speaker 28: to put resources in place for

01:40:46 Speaker 28: the call that hasn't happened yet.

01:40:47 Speaker 28: So it's not just about responding

01:40:48 Speaker 28: to the call; it's about thinking

01:40:52 Speaker 28: about where the next call is

01:40:54 Speaker 28: going to be and try to

01:40:56 Speaker 28: minimizing that next response in case

01:40:58 Speaker 28: something happens, and it's hard to

01:40:59 Speaker 28: predict. Okay, thank you. We'll go

01:41:01 Speaker 28: to Councillor Kivney. Thank you, Madam

01:41:04 Speaker 28: Warden, and Director McNab. May I

01:41:05 Speaker 28: ask you how much of a

01:41:07 Speaker 28: challenge is Google mapping in terms

01:41:07 Speaker 28: of new addressing, new? civic addressing,

01:41:09 Speaker 28: getting uploaded into Google Maps, and

01:41:11 Speaker 28: and is that creating any issue

01:41:12 Speaker 28: for you in finding those new

01:41:13 Speaker 28: addresses? I would say that we

01:41:15 Speaker 28: have a fairly extensive GIS team.

01:41:17 Speaker 28: That so when there are new

01:41:18 Speaker 28: streets, they're in constant contact with

01:41:20 Speaker 28: our dispatch centre and be able

01:41:22 Speaker 28: to update those maps. I think

01:41:23 Speaker 28: sometimes we end up in new

01:41:25 Speaker 28: developments where it may be a

01:41:27 Speaker 28: private road or a private area

01:41:29 Speaker 28: that doesn't get updated, sometimes those

01:41:34 Speaker 28: take longer, and we sometimes end

01:41:38 Speaker 28: up when we see a look

01:41:43 Speaker 28: at a response time, we see

01:41:48 Speaker 15: that that wasn't indicated. So we

01:41:49 Speaker 15: do have mechanisms to trigger when

01:41:53 Speaker 15: our response times aren't met. We

01:41:55 Speaker 15: look at the reasons why, and

01:41:57 Speaker 15: sometimes that's able to trigger that

01:41:59 Speaker 14: there's a mapping update required. But

01:42:02 Speaker 14: our dispatch generally has, I would

01:42:05 Speaker 14: say, almost always the most up

01:42:07 Speaker 14: to date map in the vehicles.

01:42:09 Speaker 14: The the CAC, the dispatch. centre

01:42:12 Speaker 14: they send the location with the

01:42:14 Speaker 14: coordinates to the to the vehicle

01:42:15 Speaker 14: which has been an update that's

01:42:18 Speaker 14: been in place now, obviously since

01:42:19 Speaker 14: 2021 like having the the map

01:42:22 Speaker 14: already displayed in the truck and

01:42:24 Speaker 14: we use ways for it so

01:42:25 Speaker 14: we're able to bring in road

01:42:28 Speaker 14: closures and stuff like that, which

01:42:30 Speaker 14: has significantly helped the response. There's

01:42:32 Speaker 14: some addresses if you're not like

01:42:38 Speaker 14: if we have a paramedic working

01:42:40 Speaker 14: in Gray they could have grew

01:42:42 Speaker 31: up in Graylee and they have

01:42:43 Speaker 31: to work in Hanover, having that

01:42:45 Speaker 31: ability you know to get in

01:42:49 Speaker 31: the truck and to know where

01:42:50 Speaker 31: you're going, really helps. So we

01:42:51 Speaker 31: tried it with that, but but

01:42:54 Speaker 31: yeah, I would say you know

01:42:56 Speaker 31: there's lots of work in the

01:42:57 Speaker 31: background to ensure that the GIS

01:43:00 Speaker 31: information is up to date at

01:43:01 Speaker 31: dispatch, and they're they're always overlaying

01:43:02 Speaker 31: those new roads into the the

01:43:04 Speaker 31: CAD. I'm not saying it's perfect,

01:43:04 Speaker 31: but they they do work hard

01:43:06 Speaker 31: to make sure nothing's missed. Okay.

01:43:13 Speaker 31: Anything else, Councillor McCabe? Sorry, Mackie.

01:43:19 Speaker 31: ah, ah, you get my dessert

01:43:22 Speaker 31: at lunch. Well, Warden, I can

01:43:26 Speaker 31: say that you're not the first

01:43:27 Speaker 32: person that's made that mistake. Thank

01:43:30 Speaker 32: you, Kevin. Thank you very much

01:43:35 Speaker 32: for the report. And I'm, you

01:43:37 Speaker 32: know, I'm impressed with our response

01:43:39 Speaker 32: times. I had the the opportunity

01:43:45 Speaker 32: to witness the response times to

01:43:47 Speaker 32: my mother's house a couple days

01:43:48 Speaker 31: ago, and I was very impressed.

01:43:50 Speaker 31: She is quite rurally located, and

01:43:52 Speaker 31: the length of time was it

01:43:54 Speaker 31: was less than what I anticipated.

01:43:56 Speaker 31: The ambulance arriving so, and the

01:43:58 Speaker 31: crew did a wonderful job looking

01:44:01 Speaker 31: after. My question is in response

01:44:03 Speaker 31: in regards to the response times.

01:44:04 Speaker 31: How does our winter weather factor

01:44:05 Speaker 31: into the? Do we have any

01:44:08 Speaker 31: idea what our inclement winter weather

01:44:10 Speaker 31: does to our response times? Thank

01:44:11 Speaker 31: you. Yeah, generally winter will play

01:44:13 Speaker 31: a role in this, whether it's

01:44:14 Speaker 31: icy roads or can't see and

01:44:15 Speaker 31: stuff like that. Again, that falls

01:44:16 Speaker 31: into that 10% range of anomalies.

01:44:19 Speaker 31: Like I don't can't like say

01:44:21 Speaker 31: off the top of my head

01:44:23 Speaker 31: like what what the time difference

01:44:26 Speaker 31: is, but you see it that

01:44:28 Speaker 31: when we look at response times

01:44:30 Speaker 31: where we didn't meet the target,

01:44:32 Speaker 31: that the weather is related. Like

01:44:34 Speaker 31: we ask the crew when the

01:44:34 Speaker 31: call closes, why did it take

01:44:38 Speaker 31: you this long to get to

01:44:40 Speaker 31: the call, and then usually it's.

01:44:42 Speaker 31: And usually, it's generally the two

01:44:44 Speaker 31: most common are distance and weather.

01:44:45 Speaker 31: Okay, thank you, Councillor McKay. Thank

01:44:48 Speaker 31: you, Alderman. Through you, Kevin, do

01:44:50 Speaker 31: you keep stats on AED calls,

01:44:52 Speaker 31: private, like the ones that are

01:44:56 Speaker 31: in the public hands, and that

01:44:56 Speaker 31: how many times they're used and

01:45:01 Speaker 31: are they worthwhile? Having these ones

01:45:02 Speaker 15: in certain places, I guess arenas,

01:45:06 Speaker 15: yes. But thanks. One of the

01:45:08 Speaker 15: issues with the response time framework,

01:45:14 Speaker 15: and we've talked about data a

01:45:16 Speaker 15: fair bit, is actually using that

01:45:18 Speaker 33: data towards ours and getting that

01:45:21 Speaker 33: those times back. Like typically, it's

01:45:22 Speaker 33: based only when the ambulance arrives.

01:45:24 Speaker 33: But our AEDs necessary? Yeah, they

01:45:27 Speaker 33: are. Well, if you have one

01:45:29 Speaker 33: AED work once that you. If

01:45:30 Speaker 33: you have one AED, work once

01:45:32 Speaker 33: a year. It depends who it's

01:45:33 Speaker 33: for, I guess, but I would

01:45:40 Speaker 33: say it's worth it no matter

01:45:42 Speaker 33: what. I hope someday that AEDs

01:45:43 Speaker 31: are in every home. That's where

01:45:46 Speaker 31: it needs to be. Most cardiac

01:45:49 Speaker 31: arrests happen in the home. That's

01:45:51 Speaker 31: probably where they need to get

01:45:53 Speaker 31: to. Right now, it's the men

01:45:54 Speaker 31: need to be on job sites,

01:45:56 Speaker 31: but you know, we—I'd say we

01:45:57 Speaker 31: have a fairly strong programme here

01:46:00 Speaker 31: in Gray. That part of the

01:46:01 Speaker 31: paramedic services budget is to maintain

01:46:03 Speaker 31: over the 200 that we have.

01:46:05 Speaker 31: We ensure that there's batteries and.

01:46:07 Speaker 31: pads, and that they're doing their

01:46:09 Speaker 31: checks, that they're ready to go

01:46:10 Speaker 31: when they're needed. But, but I,

01:46:12 Speaker 31: I really hope a day comes

01:46:14 Speaker 31: that we expand a DFB, maybe

01:46:17 Speaker 31: gets to be three hundred dollars

01:46:19 Speaker 31: or five hundred dollars, that people

01:46:21 Speaker 31: can afford them in their homes.

01:46:23 Speaker 31: And, but, yeah, we we do

01:46:24 Speaker 31: use public access DFBs. We've had

01:46:27 Speaker 31: them in arenas. We've used them

01:46:28 Speaker 31: in different places. Yet, I would

01:46:30 Speaker 31: say it's worthwhile to keep going

01:46:34 Speaker 31: with. Okay. Thank you. We'll go

01:46:36 Speaker 31: to Councillor Greg and then to

01:46:38 Speaker 31: alternate Councillor Kepke. Thank you, Kevin.

01:46:39 Speaker 31: My question is: How do hospital

01:46:41 Speaker 31: offloading requirements impact your your response

01:46:44 Speaker 31: times? And certainly, it was a

01:47:00 Speaker 31: significant challenge going back a few

01:47:01 Speaker 31: years. You're having your resources—I don't

01:47:03 Speaker 31: want to say tied up, but

01:47:04 Speaker 31: being required for prolonged periods of

01:47:11 Speaker 31: time at hospitals offloading. How are

01:47:14 Speaker 31: we comparing now? to the the

01:47:17 Speaker 31: challenges of a few years ago,

01:47:20 Speaker 20: and and what are the impacts

01:47:23 Speaker 20: of that still on on the

01:47:25 Speaker 20: plan that you're putting forward? Yeah,

01:47:27 Speaker 20: prior probably to 2022, I would

01:47:36 Speaker 20: say we really didn't have an

01:47:37 Speaker 20: offload problem, but in 2022 we

01:47:39 Speaker 20: have seen increases, particularly in Owen

01:47:40 Speaker 20: Sound and in Collingwood in the

01:47:42 Speaker 31: wintertime. I can't say enough about

01:47:44 Speaker 31: Bright Shores of how they've tried

01:47:45 Speaker 31: to do things to help. We

01:47:47 Speaker 31: have the fit to sit programme.

01:47:49 Speaker 31: now. We have extra offload stretchers.

01:47:51 Speaker 31: We have an offload duty nurse,

01:47:52 Speaker 31: which we've asked for more funding

01:47:54 Speaker 31: to be able to have a

01:47:55 Speaker 31: nurse available. We haven't received that

01:47:56 Speaker 31: yet. They only probably gave us

01:48:01 Speaker 31: a quarter of what we need

01:48:03 Speaker 31: for that programme that to support

01:48:05 Speaker 31: the hospital. We hope that that'll

01:48:08 Speaker 31: increase this year, but it does

01:48:10 Speaker 15: create issues. Like you know, in

01:48:11 Speaker 15: Sandwich, is our busiest centre. On

01:48:13 Speaker 15: busy days, it can be not

01:48:16 Speaker 15: uncommon to have four or five

01:48:19 Speaker 15: ambulances sitting and waiting. Of ailments

01:48:20 Speaker 15: is sitting and waiting for a

01:48:22 Speaker 15: bed, and so then that's the

01:48:24 Speaker 15: communication between supervisor and the nurse

01:48:26 Speaker 15: and crews. Sometimes we double up

01:48:27 Speaker 15: patients, stuff like that. But no,

01:48:30 Speaker 15: it can be challenging at times,

01:48:32 Speaker 15: and always seems to happen when

01:48:34 Speaker 15: you're the busiest too. Like typically,

01:48:41 Speaker 15: it's flu season, merges busy, most

01:48:42 Speaker 15: likely because we were busy. Okay,

01:48:45 Speaker 15: alternate. Part of the ORH review

01:48:47 Speaker 28: will be to to be looking

01:48:48 Speaker 28: at that again, and they will

01:48:51 Speaker 28: be able to comment on it.

01:48:53 Speaker 28: Thank you. Through you, Warden, to

01:48:54 Speaker 28: Kevin. My question is more regarding

01:48:54 Speaker 28: communication, and I wondered when a

01:48:57 Speaker 28: call comes in, and it's answered

01:48:58 Speaker 28: by. whatever services are required to

01:49:00 Speaker 28: go there, is it communicated to

01:49:08 Speaker 28: the incident how long approximately resources

01:49:13 Speaker 28: may be coming? That's one thing

01:49:14 Speaker 28: our dispatch centre will not do.

01:49:16 Speaker 28: I don't believe that they will

01:49:19 Speaker 28: say that time. They will reassure

01:49:20 Speaker 28: them that they've been dispatched and

01:49:24 Speaker 28: on their way, but I don't

01:49:26 Speaker 28: believe that they actually give a

01:49:28 Speaker 28: time because that could change. If

01:49:30 Speaker 28: they're going to be delayed, they

01:49:33 Speaker 28: will call back. you know, within

01:49:35 Speaker 28: I think I believe it's thirty

01:49:36 Speaker 28: minutes to do a check-in, but

01:49:37 Speaker 28: they do not say they're going

01:49:39 Speaker 28: to be six or seven minutes

01:49:41 Speaker 28: or whatever that time is. Okay,

01:49:44 Speaker 28: any further questions on this one?

01:49:45 Speaker 28: All right, not seeing any further

01:49:47 Speaker 28: hands. All those in favour? Okay,

01:49:49 Speaker 28: that motion is carried. Thank you.

01:49:52 Speaker 34: So we will now move on

01:49:53 Speaker 34: to item seven C. It's recommended

01:49:55 Speaker 34: that report PSRCW zero six twenty

01:49:57 Speaker 34: six regarding the medical priority dispatch.

01:49:59 Speaker 34: System: The receipt for information. They

01:50:05 Speaker 34: ask for a mover and a

01:50:06 Speaker 34: seconder. Got it moved by Councillor

01:50:09 Speaker 34: Pringle, seconded by Councillor Patterson. It's

01:50:11 Speaker 34: on the floor for discussion. So,

01:50:13 Speaker 34: Director McNab, I understand you are

01:50:16 Speaker 34: going to be introducing Deputy Chief

01:50:17 Speaker 34: Rob for this one as well.

01:50:19 Speaker 34: Yes, thank you, Warden and Council.

01:50:22 Speaker 34: Yes, my pleasure to introduce Jessica

01:50:24 Speaker 34: Rob, who is our Deputy Chief

01:50:26 Speaker 34: of Operations, and she's done the.

01:50:30 Speaker 34: majority of the work on this

01:50:32 Speaker 34: implementation. It's in quite a process

01:50:34 Speaker 34: to get to where it is

01:50:35 Speaker 34: today. There's a lot of work

01:50:37 Speaker 34: that goes in the background to

01:50:39 Speaker 34: implement this, and so who who

01:50:41 Speaker 34: best to tell you about it

01:50:44 Speaker 34: than her? So, here we. Good

01:50:46 Speaker 34: morning, Marden, everyone, counselors. Thank you

01:50:48 Speaker 34: for having me. So it is

01:50:52 Speaker 34: the recommendation of our department that

01:50:54 Speaker 34: we present this report for. your

01:50:56 Speaker 34: information and understanding of how the

01:50:58 Speaker 34: implementation of this new system will

01:51:00 Speaker 34: impact the community. On October 14th

01:51:02 Speaker 34: of this year, our CAC London

01:51:04 Speaker 34: Dispatch Centre is going to be

01:51:05 Speaker 34: changing to a new dispatch system

01:51:07 Speaker 34: known as the Medical Priority Dispatch

01:51:09 Speaker 34: System, or MPDS, is what we

01:51:13 Speaker 34: call it. So this new system

01:51:15 Speaker 34: is being implemented by the Ministry

01:51:17 Speaker 34: of Health. They're rolling it out

01:51:21 Speaker 34: province-wide, and about half of the

01:51:23 Speaker 34: province has transitioned so far to

01:51:25 Speaker 34: date. it's going to be replacing

01:51:27 Speaker 34: our current system, which we call

01:51:29 Speaker 34: DPci. It's been in place

01:51:31 Speaker 34: since the early nineties, and the

01:51:33 Speaker 34: goal of this new system is

01:51:40 Speaker 34: to optimize the resources across the

01:51:42 Speaker 34: county and get our paramedics to

01:51:45 Speaker 34: the sickest and most at-risk patients

01:51:47 Speaker 34: first. This chart represents a comparison

01:51:50 Speaker 34: of the old model versus the

01:51:52 Speaker 34: new model. Under DPci, you'll see

01:51:54 Speaker 34: code four and code three were

01:51:56 Speaker 34: the only level of priority calls.

01:51:58 Speaker 34: for the community, so

01:52:01 Speaker 34: these two categories would be

01:52:03 Speaker 34: all inclusive of any medical emergency

01:52:07 Speaker 34: coming in through the 911 system,

01:52:09 Speaker 34: whereas the MPDS has divided it

01:52:12 Speaker 34: down into five different priority levels.

01:52:14 Speaker 34: So under the current DPci, a

01:52:20 Speaker 34: person experiencing vomiting or a laceration,

01:52:21 Speaker 34: a heart attack or a cardiac

01:52:23 Speaker 34: arrest, could all be assigned as

01:52:24 Speaker 34: a code four response. These calls

01:52:27 Speaker 34: would be entered into the queue

01:52:28 Speaker 34: as they're received, and then dispatched

01:52:31 Speaker 34: on a first come. first serve

01:52:34 Speaker 34: basis. Under the new MPDS, dispatchers

01:52:35 Speaker 34: are going to be able to

01:52:38 Speaker 34: better prioritize medical conditions and divert

01:52:41 Speaker 34: ambulances to areas when an immediate

01:52:44 Speaker 34: life threat is identified. So, if

01:52:47 Speaker 34: there is a unit that is

01:52:50 Speaker 34: assigned on a priority basis for

01:52:52 Speaker 34: a patient with a laceration, and

01:52:54 Speaker 34: if they've been identified as the

01:52:58 Speaker 34: closest unit to a cardiac arrest

01:53:00 Speaker 34: that comes in, they will be

01:53:04 Speaker 34: diverted to the patient who has

01:53:06 Speaker 34: the greater need for timely care.

01:53:09 Speaker 34: So, in addition to being able

01:53:14 Speaker 34: to improve the triaging of medical

01:53:15 Speaker 34: emergencies, some key changes include best

01:53:18 Speaker 34: unit assignments, low priority thresholds, and

01:53:20 Speaker 34: region critical counts. All of which

01:53:22 Speaker 34: will help us improve our emergency

01:53:24 Speaker 34: coverage across the county. It also

01:53:26 Speaker 34: gives us an opportunity to better

01:53:28 Speaker 34: prioritize interfacility transfers to balance our

01:53:30 Speaker 34: community needs with the hospital needs.

01:53:33 Speaker 34: MPDS is clinically validated as safe

01:53:35 Speaker 34: and reliable way to triage medical

01:53:37 Speaker 34: conditions, and there's quality assurance programmemes

01:53:41 Speaker 34: in place, including a dispatch review

01:53:46 Speaker 34: committee in each jurisdiction, and they

01:53:49 Speaker 34: continuously review calls as they come

01:53:50 Speaker 02: in and the impacts of the

01:53:51 Speaker 02: wait times. Communities are going to

01:53:53 Speaker 02: see improved prioritization of life-threatening emergencies,

01:53:55 Speaker 02: more efficient operations, more sustainable programmeings.

01:53:56 Speaker 02: There may be community members. with

01:54:01 Speaker 02: lower needs who experience delays for

01:54:02 Speaker 02: service, and healthcare facilities will see

01:54:07 Speaker 02: changes in how transfers are prioritized.

01:54:08 Speaker 02: So, to make sure that we

01:54:10 Speaker 02: are prepared, we've taken a number

01:54:13 Speaker 02: of steps. We've met with all

01:54:16 Speaker 02: of the fire chiefs in the

01:54:19 Speaker 02: county, and we've all been able

01:54:21 Speaker 02: to agree that the translation of

01:54:23 Speaker 09: responses from the current DPCI to

01:54:26 Speaker 09: MPDS will maintain the same level

01:54:29 Speaker 09: of response that the. community is

01:54:31 Speaker 09: receiving now. Our deployment utilization strategy

01:54:32 Speaker 09: has been updated to account for

01:54:35 Speaker 09: resource allocation, wait times, and thresholds.

01:54:36 Speaker 09: Staff education has been built in

01:54:38 Speaker 09: short online digestible modules for staff

01:54:40 Speaker 09: to complete at their ability. We

01:54:45 Speaker 09: have staff who are sitting on

01:54:47 Speaker 09: regional change management and dispatch review

01:54:49 Speaker 09: committees that will continue throughout the

01:54:51 Speaker 09: transition and afterwards, and we have.

01:54:53 Speaker 09: ongoing engagement sessions with our hospitals,

01:55:00 Speaker 09: long-term care, fire, and police departments.

01:55:04 Speaker 09: So dispatch operations are governed by

01:55:08 Speaker 09: the Ministry of Health, and they

01:55:10 Speaker 09: develop this patient journey, which outlines

01:55:12 Speaker 09: how emergency calls are received and

01:55:14 Speaker 09: how they're prioritized in the queue.

01:55:15 Speaker 09: And then we take that information

01:55:17 Speaker 21: and create a plan for the

01:55:19 Speaker 21: deployment to the emergency calls, based

01:55:21 Speaker 21: on our local resources and capacity.

01:55:23 Speaker 21: No changes. to funding, staffing, or

01:55:25 Speaker 21: resources is anticipated to facilitate this

01:55:28 Speaker 21: change, and we're confident we're prepared

01:55:30 Speaker 21: for a seamless transition. Thank you.

01:55:35 Speaker 21: Thank you very much for those

01:55:39 Speaker 21: details and the explanation about what

01:55:42 Speaker 21: it means differently and how you've

01:55:44 Speaker 34: been able to parse it now

01:55:46 Speaker 34: into the colour coding instead of

01:55:47 Speaker 34: grouped together. It sounds like it

01:55:48 Speaker 34: must be a very exciting transition

01:55:50 Speaker 34: for you. Yeah, absolutely. All right.

01:55:53 Speaker 34: So with that, any questions, Deputy

01:55:54 Speaker 34: Warden? Thank you, Madam Warden, and

01:55:56 Speaker 34: thank you, Jessica, for the report

01:55:58 Speaker 34: for the discussion there. When an

01:55:59 Speaker 34: airplane's taking off, there's a certain

01:56:00 Speaker 34: point of no return. They must

01:56:03 Speaker 34: continue to. What would be the

01:56:07 Speaker 34: point of no return for an

01:56:09 Speaker 34: ambulance responding to an incident of

01:56:11 Speaker 34: low acuity, before they would not

01:56:16 Speaker 34: be diverted? Like, would it be

01:56:17 Speaker 34: literally? they turn in the gate?

01:56:18 Speaker 34: No,pe we're not going there. We're

01:56:20 Speaker 34: going further. Or is is there

01:56:23 Speaker 34: a point of no return where

01:56:24 Speaker 34: they would respond to a certain

01:56:26 Speaker 34: call before they would be diverted?

01:56:27 Speaker 34: Please. Yeah, it would be my

01:56:29 Speaker 34: understanding that that would be at

01:56:31 Speaker 34: the time of patient contact. So,

01:56:33 Speaker 34: should a higher acuity call come

01:56:36 Speaker 34: in, if that ambulance hasn't made

01:56:39 Speaker 34: patient contact, they could be diverted.

01:56:43 Speaker 34: Okay. Thank you. Great question. Oh,

01:56:50 Speaker 34: Councillor Heaney. Thank you, Madam Warden,

01:56:53 Speaker 34: and Jessica. I'm just wondering, in

01:56:57 Speaker 34: relation to your conversations with our

01:57:01 Speaker 13: fire departments as municipalities, should we

01:57:04 Speaker 13: be concerned that there may be

01:57:06 Speaker 13: a greater number of medical calls

01:57:11 Speaker 13: coming to our fire departments? Are

01:57:15 Speaker 13: we prepared for that? Just thinking

01:57:18 Speaker 13: as you're talking about the transition

01:57:23 Speaker 13: period and the possible diversion of

01:57:28 Speaker 13: certain calls. I'm just asking: Should

01:57:31 Speaker 13: our our departments be prepared for

01:57:36 Speaker 13: a greater number of calls? Thank

01:57:38 Speaker 13: you. I I can't predict what's

01:57:40 Speaker 13: going to happen, but I don't

01:57:43 Speaker 13: I don't believe so. I think

01:57:45 Speaker 13: actually it's we're gonna this progress

01:57:49 Speaker 13: is going to make us make

01:57:50 Speaker 13: sure that we have the right

01:57:54 Speaker 13: resources going at the right times

01:57:57 Speaker 13: instead of having system overwhelm. And

01:58:00 Speaker 13: we were we were very clear

01:58:04 Speaker 13: when we sat. The fire chiefs

01:58:06 Speaker 13: were very receptive to working as

01:58:11 Speaker 13: a team, and we talked through

01:58:14 Speaker 13: a lot of the points. And

01:58:15 Speaker 13: we talked about things like MBCs,

01:58:17 Speaker 13: where a low priority MBC or

01:58:19 Speaker 13: motor vehicle collision might experience a

01:58:21 Speaker 13: delay in paramedics arriving because it's

01:58:24 Speaker 13: triaged as a green, but they

01:58:25 Speaker 15: would still be dispatched to it.

01:58:27 Speaker 15: But we talked about how that

01:58:29 Speaker 15: would be important because they have

01:58:32 Speaker 15: other roles to play when it

01:58:35 Speaker 15: comes to scene safety. and protecting

01:58:38 Speaker 15: of the scene and things, they

01:58:41 Speaker 15: have a lot of other things

01:58:43 Speaker 15: that they provide, not necessarily based

01:58:44 Speaker 15: on patient contact. So the way

01:58:46 Speaker 15: that a patient is triaged doesn't

01:58:48 Speaker 15: necessarily relate to our need for

01:58:50 Speaker 15: allied agencies on scene. Is that

01:58:52 Speaker 15: fair? Okay, thank you. We'll go

01:58:54 Speaker 15: to Councillor Dober. Thank you, Warden

01:58:55 Speaker 15: and Jessica. Just. to the deputy

01:58:57 Speaker 15: warden's question and your answer, I

01:58:59 Speaker 15: can't imagine seeing an ambulance pulling

01:59:01 Speaker 15: up my lane way and then

01:59:05 Speaker 15: having them diverted because they haven't

01:59:07 Speaker 15: actually made patient contact. I wondered

01:59:08 Speaker 15: at some point we have other

01:59:10 Speaker 15: buses, you know, covering the area

01:59:11 Speaker 34: or doing things, but. is it

01:59:14 Speaker 34: communicated to the caller their level

01:59:15 Speaker 34: of priority when the call comes

01:59:17 Speaker 34: in? I, in this instance, you

01:59:18 Speaker 34: know, you see the the ambulance

01:59:20 Speaker 34: coming down your farm lane way

01:59:21 Speaker 34: and then backing out and leaving.

01:59:23 Speaker 34: Um, it just I can't imagine

01:59:24 Speaker 34: the feeling of the patient wondering,

01:59:28 Speaker 34: you know. I'm going to bleed

01:59:30 Speaker 34: to death, or could you just

01:59:31 Speaker 34: please assure us that there's other

01:59:33 Speaker 34: methods in place that diversion would

01:59:36 Speaker 34: be a last resort, or the

01:59:37 Speaker 34: communication to the caller or patient

01:59:40 Speaker 34: they understand that they're not a

01:59:42 Speaker 34: priority. How does that work? Okay,

01:59:44 Speaker 34: just before you speak, I do

01:59:46 Speaker 34: see Director McNab is also lining

01:59:49 Speaker 34: up to be able to. facilitate

01:59:51 Speaker 34: in both of you responding, keeping

01:59:55 Speaker 34: in mind too that that what

01:59:56 Speaker 34: you're describing to us is a

01:59:58 Speaker 34: practice that's already in place. It's

02:00:00 Speaker 34: just using the old system right

02:00:03 Speaker 34: now. So I'm hearing, if we

02:00:05 Speaker 28: understand correctly, from Director Mc Dow's

02:00:08 Speaker 28: first response, the deputy warden, or

02:00:10 Speaker 28: sorry, to the the deputy chief,

02:00:11 Speaker 28: that this has always been in

02:00:14 Speaker 28: play. There's always been that question

02:00:17 Speaker 28: of when is the point of

02:00:18 Speaker 28: no return on the old

02:00:21 Speaker 28: numbered system. Now it's just further

02:00:23 Speaker 28: refined into the colour system. So

02:00:25 Speaker 28: I guess that question may arise

02:00:27 Speaker 28: more frequently than it might have

02:00:29 Speaker 28: when it was just a simple

02:00:31 Speaker 28: one, two, three. So with that,

02:00:32 Speaker 28: I invite the deputy chief to

02:00:35 Speaker 28: respond and and lean into Director

02:00:37 Speaker 28: Munab if you prefer. Thank you.

02:00:38 Speaker 28: I can say that it is

02:00:39 Speaker 28: like it is a current practice.

02:00:40 Speaker 28: As you saw in the chart,

02:00:42 Speaker 28: there is a code three and

02:00:44 Speaker 28: code four priority currently. So if

02:00:47 Speaker 28: an ambulance was dispatched on a

02:00:48 Speaker 28: code three or a low priority

02:00:50 Speaker 28: call, and a code four or

02:00:52 Speaker 28: a higher priority call came in,

02:00:53 Speaker 28: they would be redirected to that

02:00:57 Speaker 28: if they were the closest unit.

02:00:58 Speaker 28: So it is an ongoing practice.

02:01:01 Speaker 28: Prior to paramedics arriving on scene,

02:01:02 Speaker 28: the patient would be in kind

02:01:05 Speaker 28: of the care and control of

02:01:07 Speaker 28: the dispatch centre and be maintaining

02:01:09 Speaker 28: communications with them. I don't think

02:01:11 Speaker 28: I could fairly speak to their

02:01:12 Speaker 28: policies, but as Director McNaught mentioned,

02:01:15 Speaker 28: they do have regular point contacts.

02:01:16 Speaker 28: where they call back and make

02:01:19 Speaker 28: contact with the patient based on

02:01:21 Speaker 28: their acuity. I would invite Kevin

02:01:22 Speaker 28: to answer anything further that I

02:01:24 Speaker 28: might be missing. Patients are always

02:01:25 Speaker 28: advised if the condition changes to

02:01:26 Speaker 28: call back, and there also is

02:01:29 Speaker 28: check-ins. I believe it's thirty minutes.

02:01:31 Speaker 28: Just recognizing here, like the likelihood

02:01:33 Speaker 28: of that happening is small, but

02:01:35 Speaker 28: but the thing is now even

02:01:39 Speaker 28: better with this new priority tool.

02:01:41 Speaker 28: If we're pulling somebody off for

02:01:42 Speaker 28: a cardiac arrest from somebody now

02:01:45 Speaker 28: that is an imminently dying, it's

02:01:47 Speaker 28: to help that other person. These

02:01:49 Speaker 28: are difficult discussions and conversations, but

02:01:51 Speaker 28: it's with the best intent to

02:01:53 Speaker 28: do the most for the most

02:01:56 Speaker 28: critical. So I I feel for

02:01:58 Speaker 28: what you're saying, like it's not

02:02:00 Speaker 28: great, and is most likely we

02:02:01 Speaker 28: get an inquiry about why the

02:02:03 Speaker 28: ambulance left, and potentially the patient

02:02:05 Speaker 28: family could call and say, I

02:02:07 Speaker 28: think the ambulance got, they think

02:02:09 Speaker 28: they might have the wrong address,

02:02:10 Speaker 28: you know, stuff. like that. But

02:02:12 Speaker 28: those type of conversations would take

02:02:13 Speaker 28: place if they call back. I

02:02:14 Speaker 28: I know because we talked about

02:02:15 Speaker 28: this before in the past about

02:02:17 Speaker 28: outside of the thirty minutes, like

02:02:19 Speaker 28: they don't give times, and I

02:02:27 Speaker 28: can see some reasons for that.

02:02:30 Speaker 28: But I'm not sure. Like when

02:02:32 Speaker 28: I look at our like when

02:02:35 Speaker 13: we measure code four times, we

02:02:39 Speaker 13: measure from the time the pager

02:02:42 Speaker 13: goes off till the time we

02:02:45 Speaker 13: arrive, because code four life and

02:02:48 Speaker 13: death call. Because code four life

02:02:51 Speaker 13: and death calls can't be held,

02:02:54 Speaker 13: like they just they have to

02:02:57 Speaker 13: be dispatched right out. Code three

02:03:00 Speaker 13: calls are now when you look

02:03:02 Speaker 13: at your yellow, your green, yellow

02:03:09 Speaker 13: and orange, they can be held,

02:03:10 Speaker 13: and that we call that a

02:03:11 Speaker 13: T one time, not a T

02:03:14 Speaker 15: two time. When we look at

02:03:15 Speaker 15: our, if we look at it

02:03:18 Speaker 15: today, like our T one time,

02:03:21 Speaker 15: the time of the call received,

02:03:23 Speaker 15: the cact, the time we arrive

02:03:25 Speaker 15: for code threes, again back to

02:03:27 Speaker 15: these green, yellow and orange, in

02:03:32 Speaker 15: twenty. In 2026, it's 25 minutes.

02:03:35 Speaker 15: So these are lower priority emergency

02:03:36 Speaker 15: calls. Nine times out of ten,

02:03:38 Speaker 15: even including the hold time, is

02:03:40 Speaker 15: still pretty good. Out of nine

02:03:42 Speaker 15: times out of ten. But it

02:03:44 Speaker 15: can't happen, yeah. But hopefully, you

02:03:48 Speaker 15: know, I look. There's nothing more

02:03:50 Speaker 15: frustrating as a paramedic that you

02:03:51 Speaker 15: know that somebody they may be

02:03:53 Speaker 15: vomiting and short of breath. Today

02:03:55 Speaker 28: it's a code four, and then

02:03:57 Speaker 28: a cardiac arrest happens around the

02:03:59 Speaker 28: corner. We can't be taken off

02:04:01 Speaker 28: that call. I feel for the

02:04:02 Speaker 28: person that's short of breath and

02:04:05 Speaker 28: vomiting, but that's not an immediate

02:04:07 Speaker 28: threat. And now I have to

02:04:09 Speaker 28: wait for an ambulance to go

02:04:11 Speaker 28: to the cardiac arrest that's ten

02:04:13 Speaker 28: minutes away, where I could just

02:04:15 Speaker 28: go, and we we can't do

02:04:17 Speaker 28: that today. Tomorrow, tomorrow we can,

02:04:21 Speaker 28: or October we can. Follow up,

02:04:23 Speaker 28: and thank you. Totally understand. Just

02:04:25 Speaker 28: when it's said out loud and

02:04:26 Speaker 28: being recorded, it's it's often. misinterpreted

02:04:29 Speaker 28: and and the perception they they

02:04:31 Speaker 28: don't always have that information and

02:04:32 Speaker 28: I appreciate the deputy chief's comments

02:04:34 Speaker 28: about and yours about callbacks. There's

02:04:36 Speaker 28: they're in touch with the patient,

02:04:38 Speaker 28: they're monitoring their their situation. So

02:04:39 Speaker 28: the communication piece is so critical.

02:04:40 Speaker 28: And looking forward to this helping

02:04:43 Speaker 28: you deliver the service that you

02:04:44 Speaker 28: so want to do. We so

02:04:46 Speaker 28: want to do. Okay, thank you.

02:04:47 Speaker 28: Anything further? All right. Not seeing

02:04:48 Speaker 28: any further hands. I'll call the

02:04:50 Speaker 28: question. All those in favour? And

02:04:54 Speaker 28: that motion is carried. Thank you

02:04:56 Speaker 28: very much, Deputy Chief. We appreciate

02:04:58 Speaker 28: your introduction to that transition system.

02:05:00 Speaker 28: But the Director McNabb will hold

02:05:02 Speaker 28: on to you for one more

02:05:05 Speaker 28: for item seven D. It's recommended

7.d PSR-CW-05-26 2025 Ministry of Health Service Review Results

The Council received a report detailing the results of a triennial service review conducted by the provincial regulatory branch. The evaluation confirmed that the organisation met all operational standards and secured a multi-year licence extension. Minor observations regarding documentation, staffing deployment, and administrative processes were identified but did not impede the renewal process. Staffing challenges persist as the team works to improve shift fill rates through enhanced recruitment strategies and flexible scheduling. The review highlighted the collaborative effort across maintenance, administration, and frontline personnel in maintaining high service quality. All identified areas for improvement have been addressed or are actively being managed by the relevant departments. The committee approved the receipt of the report and the associated land transfer recommendations to align with regional planning goals.

02:05:08 Speaker 28: that report PSRCW 0526 regarding the

02:05:10 Speaker 28: twenty. Regarding the 2025 Land Ambulance

02:05:13 Speaker 28: Service review results, be received for

02:05:17 Speaker 28: information. May I ask for a

02:05:20 Speaker 28: mover in a second? Moved by

02:05:22 Speaker 28: Councillor Hutchinson, seconded by Councillor Kevney.

02:05:24 Speaker 28: It's on the floor for discussion.

02:05:26 Speaker 28: Director McNab, the lectern is yours.

02:05:28 Speaker 28: Good morning again, Ward and County

02:05:30 Speaker 28: Council. Really happy to be here

02:05:32 Speaker 28: today to talk about this. The

02:05:34 Speaker 28: results of our last service review.

02:05:35 Speaker 28: Every three years, we go through

02:05:37 Speaker 28: a service review here. It lasts

02:05:38 Speaker 28: a couple of days, and the

02:05:42 Speaker 28: last one that took place was

02:05:44 Speaker 28: last October on the 15th and

02:05:46 Speaker 28: 16th. It's held by the or

02:05:49 Speaker 28: performed by the Ministry of Health

02:05:51 Speaker 28: Emergency Health Regulatory and Accountability Branch.

02:05:55 Speaker 28: And again, they spend a couple

02:05:57 Speaker 28: days on site, more or less

02:06:00 Speaker 28: going through our entire service, looking

02:06:03 Speaker 28: at patient care, quality assurance, administration.

02:06:05 Speaker 28: Literally, I would say thousands of

02:06:07 Speaker 28: data points. They have a team

02:06:08 Speaker 28: lead, and then they have a

02:06:10 Speaker 28: management lead and a paramedic lead.

02:06:12 Speaker 28: They also bring somebody from fleet

02:06:17 Speaker 28: services from the ministry to look

02:06:19 Speaker 28: at our vehicles, and then they

02:06:21 Speaker 28: also bring paramedics to look at

02:06:22 Speaker 28: multiple factors from the bases to

02:06:24 Speaker 28: the vehicles to the. They go

02:06:25 Speaker 28: to the hospitals to look at

02:06:26 Speaker 28: patient care. They audit our ACRs,

02:06:28 Speaker 28: so they really go through all

02:06:30 Speaker 28: more or less every entity of

02:06:33 Speaker 28: the service delivery that we offer

02:06:34 Speaker 28: here, and they compare it to

02:06:36 Speaker 28: the standard and the regulations that

02:06:39 Speaker 28: we must follow to operate an

02:06:40 Speaker 28: ambulance service. So the Rio come,

02:06:42 Speaker 28: we met all the requirements of.

02:06:43 Speaker 28: the Ministry Health Service review, and

02:06:46 Speaker 28: we were recommended for a three-year

02:06:48 Speaker 28: extension of their of our licence,

02:06:51 Speaker 28: and that was in June of

02:06:53 Speaker 28: this year. We did get observations.

02:06:55 Speaker 28: There was nine in total. Four

02:06:56 Speaker 28: of them were around documentation. We

02:06:58 Speaker 28: also had an observation around deployment

02:07:00 Speaker 28: in regards to staffing and meeting

02:07:01 Speaker 28: the deployment plan. We had a

02:07:02 Speaker 28: paramedic that had an immunization. that

02:07:03 Speaker 28: was didn't have a signature on

02:07:05 Speaker 28: it, but was corrected. A paramedic

02:07:06 Speaker 28: that didn't have their ID on

02:07:08 Speaker 28: their person. It was a bit

02:07:10 Speaker 28: of a contention. It was in

02:07:11 Speaker 28: their in her sweater and inside

02:07:14 Speaker 28: the base, but it wasn't on

02:07:16 Speaker 28: her person. But, anyways, was fine.

02:07:17 Speaker 28: Loose equipment behind the vehicles, gloves

02:07:20 Speaker 28: and stuff like that, and four.

02:07:22 Speaker 28: And then a couple around egress

02:07:23 Speaker 28: stickers and some certification documents that

02:07:24 Speaker 28: we just had to fix up.

02:07:26 Speaker 28: So the observations primarily relate to

02:07:27 Speaker 28: the staffing, documentation, and administrative processes.

02:07:28 Speaker 28: None of the observations prevented the

02:07:30 Speaker 28: renewal, and we submitted all our

02:07:31 Speaker 28: responses, corrected everything that was identified,

02:07:34 Speaker 28: mostly at the time, and then

02:07:35 Speaker 28: also over the period of time

02:07:38 Speaker 28: between the review of the summary

02:07:48 Speaker 28: report and the final report. We

02:07:50 Speaker 28: we built this the service here

02:07:52 Speaker 28: around the regulation and standards. Everything

02:07:53 Speaker 15: that we do revolves around that.

02:07:55 Speaker 15: we do revolves around them. All

02:07:57 Speaker 15: our processes and all the things

02:07:59 Speaker 15: that we have in place are

02:08:02 Speaker 15: to meet them day in and

02:08:04 Speaker 15: day out. And I think that

02:08:05 Speaker 15: speaks to the work that the

02:08:06 Speaker 15: paramedics do, the supervisors, the managers,

02:08:07 Speaker 15: the administrative staff, and then also

02:08:11 Speaker 15: the support from county council and

02:08:13 Speaker 15: the SMT and all the departments.

02:08:14 Speaker 15: Got to give a shout out

02:08:15 Speaker 15: to our maintenance staff that maintain

02:08:18 Speaker 15: our vehicles top notch and all

02:08:21 Speaker 15: our equipment. Do the testing on

02:08:24 Speaker 08: it, and then whether it's IT

02:08:29 Speaker 08: or finance or clerks, whether Clerks,

02:08:30 Speaker 08: the agreements we touch almost every

02:08:35 Speaker 08: department in this county, and it

02:08:37 Speaker 08: makes a difference when it comes

02:08:39 Speaker 08: to the service review. There's a

02:08:42 Speaker 08: lot of work to get ready

02:08:44 Speaker 08: for it, but really, what it

02:08:46 Speaker 08: is is just looking at all

02:08:48 Speaker 08: the evidence that we do over

02:08:49 Speaker 08: the last three years to be

02:08:51 Speaker 08: able to show them all our

02:08:51 Speaker 08: processes and what we have in

02:08:53 Speaker 08: place. So, really happy for the

02:08:54 Speaker 08: team. It was very successful, even

02:08:56 Speaker 08: though we had some observations. But

02:08:58 Speaker 08: I would say just an excellent

02:09:00 Speaker 08: job all around. So, and we

02:09:01 Speaker 08: we continue to learn from these

02:09:04 Speaker 08: observations. and put things in place

02:09:08 Speaker 08: to help shore it up. I

02:09:11 Speaker 08: don't know if we'll ever get

02:09:13 Speaker 08: rid of the documentation. I hope

02:09:16 Speaker 08: someday that we will, but I

02:09:20 Speaker 08: don't think so. So there's always

02:09:24 Speaker 08: going to be something that they'll

02:09:26 Speaker 08: find when they're auditing multiple data

02:09:29 Speaker 08: points on an ambulance call report.

02:09:33 Speaker 08: But again, we'll continue to to

02:09:35 Speaker 08: try to make that better each

02:09:36 Speaker 08: time, and make it a service

02:09:38 Speaker 08: that everybody's proud of. Thank you.

02:09:40 Speaker 08: very much, and thank you for

02:09:43 Speaker 08: highlighting that it it's it's a

02:09:44 Speaker 08: teamwork in progress to make

02:09:46 Speaker 08: sure that all the the various

02:09:47 Speaker 08: departments contribute to that success that

02:09:49 Speaker 08: you've that you've described. So congratulations

02:09:50 Speaker 08: to your participation, but thank you

02:09:52 Speaker 08: also for mentioning the other departments.

02:09:55 Speaker 08: I understand the deputy CAO would

02:09:57 Speaker 08: like to have a few words

02:09:59 Speaker 08: before I open it to committee.

02:10:02 Speaker 08: The whole members. Thank you very

02:10:03 Speaker 08: much, Madam Warden. So over the

02:10:05 Speaker 08: last year or so, as I've

02:10:14 Speaker 08: had the opportunity to work with

02:10:16 Speaker 08: with Kevin and members of Kevin's

02:10:17 Speaker 08: team, Kevin comes across as an

02:10:19 Speaker 15: incredibly quiet-spoken gentleman. He he effuses

02:10:22 Speaker 15: modesty when it comes to the

02:10:27 Speaker 15: service. We discussed whether or not

02:10:29 Speaker 15: to even put those nine things

02:10:31 Speaker 20: in. These are nine things

02:10:33 Speaker 20: where somebody had a a card

02:10:37 Speaker 20: in a sweater that wasn't on

02:10:44 Speaker 20: their person at the time. These

02:10:46 Speaker 20: are very very minor things that

02:10:50 Speaker 20: the team spent a week looking.

02:10:53 Speaker 20: for. I had the opportunity to

02:10:55 Speaker 28: delve in and meet the team

02:10:57 Speaker 28: that came in to start the

02:11:00 Speaker 28: inspection work, and I met them

02:11:02 Speaker 28: at the start and I met

02:11:03 Speaker 28: them at the end, and I

02:11:05 Speaker 28: saw them midway through. And midway

02:11:06 Speaker 28: through this room here, the table

02:11:09 Speaker 28: was covered from one end to

02:11:11 Speaker 28: the other with pieces of paper

02:11:13 Speaker 28: that they were flitting through and

02:11:17 Speaker 28: looking for things that the the

02:11:19 Speaker 28: team can improve on. Kevin leads

02:11:20 Speaker 28: an incredible team of of both

02:11:22 Speaker 28: his management team and the front

02:11:24 Speaker 28: line. And the frontline paramedics doing

02:11:26 Speaker 28: an outstanding body of work. This

02:11:28 Speaker 28: we present this report in Kevin's

02:11:30 Speaker 28: modest tenure and tone, but this

02:11:33 Speaker 28: is a shining example of what

02:11:36 Speaker 28: Gray County does incredibly well. We

02:11:38 Speaker 28: have a paramedic team that, as

02:11:39 Speaker 28: a council, I am sure and

02:11:41 Speaker 28: I know you are proud of,

02:11:42 Speaker 28: and this report really does offer

02:11:46 Speaker 28: glowing praise for the work of

02:11:48 Speaker 28: Kevin. Kevin's management team, and every

02:11:50 Speaker 28: single one of our frontline paramedics

02:11:51 Speaker 28: provide daily service inside and out

02:11:54 Speaker 28: to members of community at Grey

02:11:56 Speaker 28: County. And so, I'd like to

02:11:58 Speaker 28: offer my congratulations as well to

02:11:59 Speaker 28: Kevin on on an outstanding job.

02:12:00 Speaker 28: And hopefully, I have been a

02:12:03 Speaker 28: little conveyed some of my enthusiasm

02:12:04 Speaker 28: for the work of Kevin and

02:12:07 Speaker 28: his team, and and tried to

02:12:08 Speaker 28: beat down some of Kevin's modesty

02:12:10 Speaker 28: on this one because it really

02:12:12 Speaker 28: is a a triumph. Excellent, thank

02:12:13 Speaker 28: you. So let me open it

02:12:15 Speaker 28: up to the floor for questions

02:12:17 Speaker 28: or comments. We'll begin with alternate

02:12:18 Speaker 28: Councillor Kepke. Thank you, Warden, and

02:12:20 Speaker 28: to you, Kevin. Congratulations as well,

02:12:21 Speaker 28: extended on your service that you

02:12:23 Speaker 28: do provide. My questions regarding the

02:12:26 Speaker 28: first observation: deployment, staffing, and maintaining

02:12:27 Speaker 28: sufficient staff. How is that being

02:12:29 Speaker 28: handled? Staffing over the last five

02:12:31 Speaker 28: years, say since COVID, has been

02:12:33 Speaker 28: difficult. Attracting staff, you know, getting

02:12:34 Speaker 28: staff to to work, you know,

02:12:36 Speaker 28: is able to meet the needs

02:12:39 Speaker 28: of the deployment plan. It has

02:12:41 Speaker 28: been tough, and so when you

02:12:42 Speaker 28: look at the numbers, we're filling

02:12:43 Speaker 28: between ninety six to ninety seven

02:12:46 Speaker 28: percent of the shifts, but we're

02:12:50 Speaker 28: still not one hundred percent. So

02:12:51 Speaker 28: We're still not a hundred percent,

02:12:52 Speaker 28: so but so but we continue

02:12:57 Speaker 28: to work on that. The way

02:13:00 Speaker 28: we do things here, we have

02:13:02 Speaker 28: we offer overtime on areas where

02:13:04 Speaker 28: we have known where we sometimes

02:13:06 Speaker 28: have more absences, like on weekends.

02:13:08 Speaker 15: We, if we can, we upstaff

02:13:12 Speaker 15: ahead of time with some people

02:13:13 Speaker 15: to try to absorb those first

02:13:16 Speaker 15: number of book offs to be

02:13:18 Speaker 15: able to maintain. We can pull

02:13:19 Speaker 15: from our CP programme. We have

02:13:20 Speaker 15: supervisors that can work. We have

02:13:22 Speaker 15: on call that comes in. We

02:13:25 Speaker 15: have managers to back up. I

02:13:27 Speaker 15: came in at Christmas. You know,

02:13:28 Speaker 15: I mean, like just it's ongoing.

02:13:30 Speaker 15: I I must say though, every

02:13:32 Speaker 15: year it gets better. We went

02:13:35 Speaker 15: through this in 2004. I would

02:13:37 Speaker 15: say it was probably worse then.

02:13:38 Speaker 15: We're coming out of it. It's

02:13:41 Speaker 15: not over yet. We're not like

02:13:43 Speaker 15: unlike other places. There may be

02:13:46 Speaker 15: some services in Ontario that aren't

02:13:48 Speaker 15: having trouble, but I would say

02:13:50 Speaker 15: most are still having trouble or

02:13:53 Speaker 15: or just coming. out of it

02:13:56 Speaker 15: as well. I just and also

02:13:58 Speaker 15: through this we've had growth, and

02:14:00 Speaker 15: I just kind of anticipated maybe

02:14:02 Speaker 15: a question around this, so I

02:14:05 Speaker 15: did write some numbers just to

02:14:11 Speaker 15: have available. Like so far this

02:14:13 Speaker 15: year, we're still sitting around ninety

02:14:17 Speaker 15: six and a half percent of

02:14:20 Speaker 15: the shifts that we're filling, three

02:14:23 Speaker 15: and a half that we're not.

02:14:24 Speaker 15: That equals to two hundred seventy

02:14:27 Speaker 15: four. But I go back in

02:14:29 Speaker 15: the last two years, we've added

02:14:31 Speaker 15: twenty five hundred and fifty five

02:14:33 Speaker 15: shifts, so we're still twenty two

02:14:36 Speaker 15: hundred more than we were. two

02:14:39 Speaker 15: years ago at this time when

02:14:42 Speaker 15: we had downsizing, so it is

02:14:45 Speaker 15: not fixed yet. But we are

02:14:48 Speaker 15: working on it. At one time,

02:14:50 Speaker 15: we used to only hire once

02:14:53 Speaker 15: a year. Now we hire twice

02:14:55 Speaker 15: a year. But but each year

02:14:58 Speaker 15: gets better. And again, we have.

02:15:01 Speaker 15: I would say we're coming out

02:15:03 Speaker 15: of it, but but we're not

02:15:05 Speaker 15: out of it yet. Okay. Thank

02:15:07 Speaker 15: you. Any further questions or comments?

02:15:11 Speaker 15: Okay. I'm not seeing any further.

02:15:13 Speaker 15: hands. All those in favour? That

02:15:15 Speaker 15: motion is carried. Thank you again,

02:15:17 Speaker 15: and thank you to all of

02:15:19 Speaker 15: your team. So with that, yes,

02:15:21 Speaker 15: appropriately, with ten minutes before we

02:15:23 Speaker 15: know our lunches about to to

02:15:26 Speaker 15: arrive, I'm going to read out

02:15:29 Speaker 15: the recommended motion. That might take

02:15:32 Speaker 15: me five minutes because this one's

02:15:34 Speaker 15: a little bit long, and it's

02:15:37 Speaker 15: not a not a committee committee

02:15:40 Speaker 15: motion where I can refer to

02:15:42 Speaker 15: what's already been published. I think

02:15:44 Speaker 15: this one needs to be read

02:15:46 Speaker 15: for clarity. so it is recommended

02:15:48 Speaker 15: that report PDRCW thirty four twenty

02:15:51 Speaker 15: six be received, and that the

02:15:53 Speaker 15: land exchange between the county

02:15:56 Speaker 15: and the township of Southgate for

02:15:58 Speaker 15: nominal consideration for the following lands

02:16:00 Speaker 15: abutting the CP rail trail in

02:16:04 Speaker 15: Dundalk be approved to align with

02:16:07 Speaker 15: the township of Southgate's long term

02:16:10 Speaker 15: plans for the section of Dundalk,

02:16:12 Speaker 15: the town, the county lands described

02:16:16 Speaker 15: as part of Lot two to

02:16:18 Speaker 15: nine concession two. nine concession two

02:16:19 Speaker 15: southwest of the Toronto and Sydney

02:16:22 Speaker 18: Road, being part one in the

02:16:23 Speaker 18: attached draft reference plan, be transferred

02:16:25 Speaker 18: to Southgate. The township lands described

02:16:26 Speaker 18: as part of lot two two

02:16:29 Speaker 18: nine concession two southwest of the

02:16:32 Speaker 18: Toronto and Sydney Road, being parts

02:16:33 Speaker 18: twelve and thirteen in the attached

02:16:36 Speaker 18: reference plan, be transferred to the

02:16:39 Speaker 18: county, and that the county waive

02:16:41 Speaker 18: the requirement for a bylaw to

02:16:43 Speaker 18: execute the land transfer agreement as

02:16:45 Speaker 18: set out in the county's sale

02:16:47 Speaker 18: of land procedure G G E

02:16:48 Speaker 18: N zero three zero zero three

02:16:51 Speaker 18: zero zero one and acquisition of

02:16:54 Speaker 18: land procedure G G E N

02:16:56 Speaker 18: zero zero three zero zero two

02:16:58 Speaker 18: and any successor thereto, and that

02:16:59 Speaker 18: the warden and clerk be authorised

02:17:00 Speaker 18: to execute the land exchange agreement

02:17:02 Speaker 18: once finalized, and that the staff

02:17:04 Speaker 18: be directed to incorporate language into

02:17:06 Speaker 18: the language the land exchange agreement

02:17:09 Speaker 18: to address the cost sharing arrangements

02:17:10 Speaker 18: between the county and Southgate that

02:17:12 Speaker 18: were previously outlined in the cost

02:17:15 Speaker 18: sharing agreement dated October six, twenty

02:17:16 Speaker 18: twenty one, to the extent required

02:17:19 Speaker 18: based on the new long term

02:17:20 Speaker 18: plans for this area of Dundalk,

02:17:22 Speaker 18: and that staff be directed to

02:17:24 Speaker 18: release various parcels of land from

02:17:26 Speaker 18: the cost sharing agreement registered in

02:17:27 Speaker 18: the land. Registry Office of Gray

02:17:30 Speaker 18: Number Sixteen as Instrument GY Two

02:17:32 Speaker 18: One Five Zero Three Zero, as

02:17:34 Speaker 18: deemed necessary to effect the long-term

02:17:36 Speaker 18: plans for this area of Dundalk,

02:17:38 Speaker 18: and deemed appropriate through consultation with

02:17:41 Speaker 18: the Director of Planning, CAO and

02:17:42 Speaker 18: Deputy CAO, and the County Solicitor,

02:17:44 Speaker 18: and that staff be authorised to

02:17:47 Speaker 18: carry out the above prior to

02:17:49 Speaker 18: the County Council approval, as per

02:17:50 Speaker 18: Section Twenty Six Point Six. Twenty-six

02:17:53 Speaker 18: point six B of our procedural

02:17:55 Speaker 18: bylaw fifty-one thirty-four twenty-two. May I

02:17:58 Speaker 18: ask for a mover and a

02:17:59 Speaker 18: second? Moved by the deputy warden.

02:18:01 Speaker 18: Looking, yeah, that's right. Could you

02:18:04 Speaker 18: repeat that? And seconded by by

02:18:05 Speaker 18: Councillor Dobreen. It's now on the

02:18:07 Speaker 18: floor for discussion. Welcome, Director Taylor,

02:18:10 Speaker 18: to the lectern. Thanks, Madam Warden,

02:18:12 Speaker 18: and and this report was truly

02:18:18 Speaker 18: a team effort between Legal Services

02:18:19 Speaker 18: Clerk. Between legal services clerks and

02:18:21 Speaker 18: planning, the downside of a team

02:18:22 Speaker 18: effort between legal services clerks and

02:18:24 Speaker 18: planning is you get emotion, like

02:18:26 Speaker 18: you just read. So, appreciate your

02:18:28 Speaker 18: patience. This is just very briefly

02:18:30 Speaker 18: following up on a past closed

02:18:33 Speaker 18: session discussion where staff received direction

02:18:35 Speaker 18: back in September 2025, and that

02:18:37 Speaker 18: was to work with Township of

02:18:39 Speaker 18: Southgate staff to investigate a potential

02:18:41 Speaker 18: land swap, if you will. And

02:18:44 Speaker 18: these lands are alongside the CP

02:18:46 Speaker 18: rail trail, as we talked about

02:18:47 Speaker 18: earlier in council. rate in in

02:18:49 Speaker 18: downtown Dundalk, and essentially the county

02:18:51 Speaker 18: would be would be trading lands

02:18:54 Speaker 18: sort of on on the east

02:18:57 Speaker 18: side of the trail for lands

02:18:59 Speaker 18: on the west side of the

02:19:02 Speaker 18: trail with the township. And as

02:19:04 Speaker 18: some might recall, there was a

02:19:06 Speaker 18: land donation agreement done back in

02:19:08 Speaker 18: 2021 when the township was looking

02:19:10 Speaker 18: at a new medical clinic in

02:19:14 Speaker 18: this area, and there were some

02:19:17 Speaker 18: commitments through that land donation agreement

02:19:19 Speaker 18: that that Southgate took on as

02:19:20 Speaker 18: part of that agreement. In speaking

02:19:24 Speaker 18: further with township staff, there's some

02:19:27 Speaker 18: of those commitments that are no

02:19:28 Speaker 18: longer relevant now that the medical

02:19:30 Speaker 18: clinic plans might be changed. And

02:19:32 Speaker 18: as such, through this this motion

02:19:34 Speaker 18: and this report, we're looking for

02:19:35 Speaker 18: some leeway to to release some

02:19:36 Speaker 18: of those commitments, but but still

02:19:37 Speaker 18: continue on with some, including some

02:19:38 Speaker 18: of the trail upgrades and and

02:19:40 Speaker 18: the the need for exploration of

02:19:41 Speaker 18: future parking in this area. Council

02:19:44 Speaker 18: may recall there was a further

02:19:46 Speaker 18: land sale to Midwest Co-op in

02:19:48 Speaker 15: 2024. That sale has been completed,

02:19:52 Speaker 15: and and the old mill building

02:19:55 Speaker 15: just near here has since been

02:19:57 Speaker 15: torn down. So Southgate staff took

02:20:00 Speaker 15: this this matter to their council

02:20:05 Speaker 17: on August 5th. At that time,

02:20:07 Speaker 17: Southgate staff outlined sort of the

02:20:09 Speaker 17: long term plans for this area,

02:20:12 Speaker 17: including a series of of potential

02:20:16 Speaker 17: changes between the county and township,

02:20:19 Speaker 17: which we're hearing about today, and

02:20:20 Speaker 17: also further discussions between the the

02:20:24 Speaker 17: township and and Midwest Co-op in

02:20:26 Speaker 17: that regard. With that report. township

02:20:30 Speaker 17: council supported this this land swap,

02:20:31 Speaker 17: and if you will, the the

02:20:39 Speaker 17: lands really are a a like

02:20:41 Speaker 17: for like, and they're being traded

02:20:43 Speaker 17: in in an as is condition.

02:20:48 Speaker 15: The only reason why on map

02:20:50 Speaker 15: two the lands look slightly larger

02:20:52 Speaker 15: that the county is getting is

02:20:54 Speaker 15: because part twelve currently contains a

02:20:57 Speaker 15: a small hydro easement. So in

02:20:58 Speaker 26: order for for the county to

02:21:00 Speaker 26: get a similar sized parcel, which

02:21:02 Speaker 26: is part thirteen to part one,

02:21:05 Speaker 26: which they're trading, we we didn't.

02:21:07 Speaker 26: count those those hydro easement lands

02:21:09 Speaker 26: in the total, and then finally

02:21:12 Speaker 26: the reason for the motion being

02:21:14 Speaker 26: quite as as long as it

02:21:17 Speaker 26: is is because we are coming

02:21:18 Speaker 26: up to the restricted acts deadline

02:21:21 Speaker 26: under the municipal act, and and

02:21:23 Speaker 26: to make sure we're we're keeping

02:21:24 Speaker 26: with with the legislative requirements in

02:21:27 Speaker 26: this regard, we've consulted with both

02:21:29 Speaker 26: the clerk and legal services, and

02:21:30 Speaker 26: as such, there's clauses in the

02:21:32 Speaker 26: in the motion which, if supported

02:21:35 Speaker 26: today, would allow for this this

02:21:36 Speaker 26: land transfer agreement or land exchange

02:21:39 Speaker 26: agreement to be finalized without the

02:21:42 Speaker 26: need for a bylaw coming back

02:21:45 Speaker 26: to council. There is documentation in

02:21:48 Speaker 26: the report. The direction under which

02:21:49 Speaker 26: staff would be would be negotiating

02:21:51 Speaker 26: that agreement. So if council supports

02:21:53 Speaker 18: this recommendation here today, it would

02:21:55 Speaker 18: it would simply not require that

02:21:56 Speaker 18: bylaw. With that, I am happy

02:21:59 Speaker 18: to turn it back to you,

02:22:00 Speaker 18: Madam Warden. But I just note

02:22:03 Speaker 18: that we have both the clerk

02:22:05 Speaker 18: and Ms. Lacey Thompson and in

02:22:07 Speaker 18: the back. Lacey Thompson in in

02:22:08 Speaker 18: the back. If there are any

02:22:09 Speaker 18: technical questions, thank you. Okay, thank

02:22:12 Speaker 18: you for that introduction. So with

02:22:14 Speaker 18: that, I'll put it out to

02:22:17 Speaker 18: committee. The whole, any questions or

02:22:20 Speaker 18: comments? Okay, we'll go to Councillor

02:22:22 Speaker 18: Eccles. Just for clarity, the reason

02:22:25 Speaker 18: that we're not doing the bylaws

02:22:27 Speaker 18: because of lame duck period may

02:22:29 Speaker 18: or may not kick in, but

02:22:32 Speaker 18: if we did the motion today.

02:22:34 Speaker 18: to prepare the bylaw, would that

02:22:36 Speaker 18: not step ahead? That it was

02:22:38 Speaker 18: granted to be prepared before lame

02:22:40 Speaker 18: duck. I guess it's a timing

02:22:43 Speaker 18: issue. I just feel a little

02:22:45 Speaker 18: at ease that we do everything

02:22:46 Speaker 18: by bylaw, and yet on something

02:22:50 Speaker 18: that is at that time sensitive,

02:22:54 Speaker 18: that we need to bypass that

02:22:57 Speaker 18: procedure. Okay, so I think I'm

02:22:59 Speaker 18: going to begin with the quorum.

02:23:00 Speaker 18: I'll start with Madam Quorum. Thank

02:23:01 Speaker 18: you and to you, Madam Warden.

02:23:04 Speaker 18: As staff, I think we can

02:23:05 Speaker 15: relate to your somewhat discomfort in

02:23:08 Speaker 15: proceeding without a bylaw. However, my

02:23:09 Speaker 15: understanding is that this is a

02:23:15 Speaker 15: time-sensitive matter, but perhaps Director Taylor

02:23:16 Speaker 15: could elabourate on that a little

02:23:17 Speaker 15: bit. This is the last regular

02:23:19 Speaker 15: meeting that we have scheduled. for

02:23:20 Speaker 15: County Council before we may go

02:23:21 Speaker 15: into the lame duck position next

02:23:24 Speaker 15: Friday on the 21st, and the

02:23:27 Speaker 15: next meeting would be September 10th.

02:23:28 Speaker 15: So the bylaw would be the

02:23:30 Speaker 15: final step in that approval process,

02:23:33 Speaker 15: having it passed by County Council.

02:23:34 Speaker 15: And unfortunately, if we are in

02:23:37 Speaker 15: a lame duck position in September,

02:23:39 Speaker 15: that bylaw isn't able to be

02:23:41 Speaker 15: passed because it's one of the

02:23:44 Speaker 15: restricted acts in the Municipal Act.

02:23:47 Speaker 15: So this is the the last

02:23:48 Speaker 15: possible. time, as staff, we felt

02:23:52 Speaker 15: we could bring it forward and

02:23:54 Speaker 15: still fit the legislative framework that

02:23:56 Speaker 15: we're working within. Okay, Dr. Taylor,

02:23:57 Speaker 15: did you want to add anything

02:23:57 Speaker 15: to that? Sure, thank you, Madam.

02:23:59 Speaker 15: I don't have a lot to

02:24:01 Speaker 15: add here. I will say that

02:24:03 Speaker 15: that both the clerk and and

02:24:06 Speaker 15: legal services department were were very

02:24:12 Speaker 15: helpful in this, and we talked

02:24:13 Speaker 15: about all options, including would we

02:24:14 Speaker 15: schedule a separate county council meeting

02:24:18 Speaker 15: after this ahead of a This

02:24:19 Speaker 15: ahead of ahead of that restricted

02:24:22 Speaker 15: access period, in this case, the

02:24:24 Speaker 15: reason staff put this forward on

02:24:29 Speaker 15: the agenda day is because we

02:24:31 Speaker 15: had had that past school session

02:24:32 Speaker 35: discussion approximately a year ago, so

02:24:34 Speaker 35: September 2025, and we do understand

02:24:38 Speaker 35: in in talking with the the

02:24:39 Speaker 35: township that this is a small

02:24:42 Speaker 35: piece of of the larger plans

02:24:45 Speaker 35: for downtown Dundalk, some of which

02:24:46 Speaker 35: are time sensitive on their end.

02:24:48 Speaker 35: So, while this might not be

02:24:49 Speaker 35: a extreme time sensitive priority to

02:24:50 Speaker 35: Time-sensitive priority to to the county

02:24:52 Speaker 35: of Grey. We think in in

02:24:54 Speaker 35: working with the township as as

02:24:55 Speaker 35: a municipal partner, and certainly through

02:24:58 Speaker 35: the ward. And invite any comments

02:25:00 Speaker 35: from our our township of Southgate

02:25:02 Speaker 35: representatives here today. We thought

02:25:05 Speaker 35: it was best to to

02:25:08 Speaker 35: put this on on the agenda

02:25:12 Speaker 35: for council's consideration to to see

02:25:14 Speaker 35: to see the feedback here today.

02:25:17 Speaker 35: Okay. Anything else? All right. I

02:25:19 Speaker 35: don't see any further hands. Then

02:25:21 Speaker 35: you have the information. in front

02:25:26 Speaker 35: of us. I'll call the question.

02:25:27 Speaker 35: All those in favour, and that

02:25:30 Speaker 35: motion is carried. Thank you very

02:25:33 Speaker 35: much, Director Taylor, and Madam Clerk.

02:25:35 Speaker 35: I'll just consult with you in

02:25:36 Speaker 35: terms of timing. Okay, so at

02:25:39 Speaker 35: some point we will break for

02:25:42 Speaker 35: lunch when we know that it's

02:25:44 Speaker 35: arrived, but we're going to keep

02:25:46 Speaker 35: working until that happens. So with

02:25:49 Speaker 35: that, then I would like to

02:25:52 Speaker 35: go to item seven F, and

02:25:56 Speaker 35: it is recommended that staff report

02:25:58 Speaker 35: PDR CW twenty eight twenty six

02:26:01 Speaker 35: for. W twenty eight twenty six

02:26:03 Speaker 35: regarding the pursuit of an upper

7.f PDR-CW-28-26 Considering an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan for Grey County

Council considered an Upper-Tier Community Improvement Plan for Grey County to support affordable housing and transit corridors within the ten-year capital budget. The proposal suggests including related costs in the development charges background study and phasing the project through analysis, capacity evaluation, and programme design. Council members debated establishing this plan to provide flexible incentives for affordable housing development by waiving current funding restrictions on nonprofits and land acquisition. Speakers noted that while legislative ability exists, implementation requires further work on budgeting, sequencing activities, and reporting back before any money is earmarked.

02:26:05 Speaker 35: tier community improvement plan for Gray

02:26:08 Speaker 35: County be received and that the

02:26:11 Speaker 35: committee the whole the hereby direct

02:26:12 Speaker 35: staff to add the commute the

02:26:14 Speaker 35: county CIP as a project within

02:26:15 Speaker 35: the ten year capital budget from

02:26:17 Speaker 35: twenty twenty seven to twenty thirty

02:26:19 Speaker 35: six for the planning department to

02:26:21 Speaker 35: include it within the development charges

02:26:23 Speaker 35: background study and we'll hear from

02:26:25 Speaker 35: senior policy planner Buckton in just

02:26:28 Speaker 35: a moment I'll ask for a

02:26:30 Speaker 35: move. A moment. I'll ask for

02:26:33 Speaker 35: a mover and a seconder to

02:26:35 Speaker 35: get it on the floor. We've

02:26:37 Speaker 35: got it moved by Councillor Dobrind,

02:26:38 Speaker 35: seconded by alternate Councillor Kepke. It's

02:26:40 Speaker 35: now on the floor for discussion.

02:26:43 Speaker 35: Welcome. What might be just ahead

02:26:45 Speaker 35: of lunch? Thank you so very

02:26:48 Speaker 35: much. And planners are going to

02:26:51 Speaker 35: get a reputation here, right? Um.

02:26:56 Speaker 35: Thank Thank you so much. Really

02:26:57 Speaker 35: glad to be here today. Are

02:26:59 Speaker 35: you able to control that from

02:27:02 Speaker 35: your end? Or yep. Okay. Amazing,

02:27:04 Speaker 35: thank you. So we will be

02:27:06 Speaker 35: brief in the event that lunch

02:27:08 Speaker 35: just arrives the second I started

02:27:11 Speaker 35: talking. There is Murphy's law and

02:27:12 Speaker 35: dictates. So we'll we'll jump right

02:27:14 Speaker 35: in. So as you noted, the

02:27:16 Speaker 35: report focuses around community improvement plans

02:27:20 Speaker 35: and and contemplating a plan for

02:27:23 Speaker 35: Gray County at the upper tier

02:27:26 Speaker 35: level. I thought I better start

02:27:27 Speaker 35: where where we usually need to

02:27:28 Speaker 35: start, which is what is a

02:27:31 Speaker 35: community improvement plan. I think those

02:27:33 Speaker 35: around this table will know. but

02:27:35 Speaker 35: for anybody else who may be

02:27:37 Speaker 35: watching or or listening in, a

02:27:40 Speaker 35: community improvement plan is a flexible

02:27:43 Speaker 35: tool under the Planning Act that

02:27:46 Speaker 35: allows municipalities to offer targeted incentives

02:27:47 Speaker 35: to support various different community projects

02:27:48 Speaker 35: or outcomes. Oftentimes, there are prohibitions,

02:27:51 Speaker 35: for example, within the Municipal Act

02:27:53 Speaker 35: around bonusing or or providing incentives,

02:27:54 Speaker 35: but this tool creates the framework

02:27:57 Speaker 35: within which we we can do

02:28:00 Speaker 35: so. legally, and so various different

02:28:01 Speaker 35: programme types can can be part

02:28:03 Speaker 35: of a community improvement plan. I

02:28:05 Speaker 35: know that answers are familiar with

02:28:06 Speaker 35: the tax increment equivalent grants, and

02:28:11 Speaker 35: we've seen some of those at

02:28:13 Speaker 35: county level in conjunction with lower

02:28:15 Speaker 35: tier CIP initiatives. There's a variety

02:28:16 Speaker 35: of other tools that can be

02:28:19 Speaker 35: enacted through CIP, such as grants

02:28:22 Speaker 35: and loans, and the CIP document

02:28:24 Speaker 35: itself outlines the criteria that. would

02:28:27 Speaker 35: apply for eligibility and the programme

02:28:29 Speaker 35: itself. So the county has, since

02:28:31 Speaker 35: 2019, administered a countywide CAP programme,

02:28:34 Speaker 35: but that has been implemented through

02:28:36 Speaker 35: member municipalities and their local official

02:28:39 Speaker 35: plans. So up until just recently,

02:28:41 Speaker 35: upper tier municipalities required to be

02:28:44 Speaker 35: prescribed to have an upper tier

02:28:45 Speaker 35: CAP, and I might be getting

02:28:48 Speaker 35: a little ahead of myself, a

02:28:50 Speaker 35: slide or two, but that has

02:28:52 Speaker 35: changed with Bill 60, and we

02:28:54 Speaker 35: can now. have an upper tier

02:28:56 Speaker 35: plan. So through the existing programme,

02:28:59 Speaker 35: the county has supported local municipalities

02:29:01 Speaker 35: with the CIP programme design. We've

02:29:04 Speaker 35: provided a templated document, kind of

02:29:05 Speaker 35: outlining how those CIPs might be

02:29:07 Speaker 35: structured. We've supported with some coordination

02:29:11 Speaker 35: and monitoring, and I know Savannah's

02:29:12 Speaker 35: team keeps some stats and does

02:29:14 Speaker 35: reporting back to town council around

02:29:17 Speaker 35: our participation with those programmemes as

02:29:20 Speaker 35: well. And we have offered and

02:29:22 Speaker 35: and and do offer aligned heritage

02:29:24 Speaker 35: tax rebates. and tax incremental equivalent

02:29:27 Speaker 35: grants, again for those local CIPs

02:29:28 Speaker 35: supported projects. As I noted, there

02:29:31 Speaker 35: has been changes to legislation that

02:29:32 Speaker 35: would allow for upper tier CIPs

02:29:33 Speaker 35: to to have or sort of

02:29:36 Speaker 35: upper tier municipalities to have CIPs,

02:29:37 Speaker 35: but it is a sculpted list

02:29:39 Speaker 35: of matters that those upper tier

02:29:41 Speaker 35: CIPs can address. So I've just

02:29:43 Speaker 35: listed those here on the slide,

02:29:46 Speaker 35: but would highlight affordable housing as

02:29:48 Speaker 35: being one. Housing is being one

02:29:49 Speaker 35: of those items in particular, also

02:29:54 Speaker 35: including infrastructure and lands and buildings

02:29:56 Speaker 35: with respect to transit corridors. So,

02:29:58 Speaker 35: also on the screen, we've got

02:30:01 Speaker 35: a lovely image there of the

02:30:03 Speaker 35: Housing Action Plan. So that had

02:30:05 Speaker 35: been endorsed by County Council in

02:30:06 Speaker 35: 2023, and within that document, there

02:30:09 Speaker 35: is a stated intent to

02:30:11 Speaker 35: maintain those CIP-related incentives to support

02:30:13 Speaker 35: the local municipalities and to look

02:30:15 Speaker 35: at upper-tier complementary programmemes. When that

02:30:17 Speaker 35: plan was written, we didn't have

02:30:20 Speaker 35: the ability at that point in

02:30:22 Speaker 35: time to have an efforts here

02:30:24 Speaker 35: CIP. Although there had been interim

02:30:25 Speaker 35: reports over the past couple of

02:30:28 Speaker 35: years that have contemplated that idea,

02:30:30 Speaker 35: we had been seeking some direction

02:30:32 Speaker 35: to reach out to the province

02:30:33 Speaker 35: to determine how to be prescribed

02:30:35 Speaker 35: for a CIP around the time

02:30:38 Speaker 35: that Bill sixty was enacted and

02:30:40 Speaker 35: we can put that permission in

02:30:42 Speaker 35: place, anyways. So you know, I

02:30:44 Speaker 35: think CIPs are. are nimble tools.

02:30:45 Speaker 35: We can tailor it the way

02:30:47 Speaker 35: that that would be helpful for

02:30:49 Speaker 35: us. But through that lens of

02:30:50 Speaker 35: of application to housing, I do

02:30:52 Speaker 35: think that a county CIP could

02:30:55 Speaker 35: really support that strategic targeting of

02:30:59 Speaker 35: incentives towards projects that we think

02:31:02 Speaker 35: are are needed to develop that

02:31:02 Speaker 35: more balanced housing mix. I think

02:31:04 Speaker 35: the market is definitely delivering the

02:31:06 Speaker 35: housing that the market can, but

02:31:08 Speaker 35: affordable housing in particular is very

02:31:12 Speaker 35: difficult. to pencil out, and not

02:31:14 Speaker 35: all creators of affordable housing have

02:31:16 Speaker 35: access to readily available capital or

02:31:19 Speaker 35: financial tools very early in their

02:31:22 Speaker 35: processes. And so, I think there

02:31:24 Speaker 35: could be some strategy around where

02:31:26 Speaker 35: we could place those incentives in

02:31:28 Speaker 35: the process to support those housing

02:31:32 Speaker 35: types we need. I think that

02:31:33 Speaker 35: CAP could create greater ease and

02:31:36 Speaker 35: flexibility as well for use of

02:31:39 Speaker 35: surplus municipal lands and partnerships around

02:31:40 Speaker 35: those lands. There are some provisions.

02:31:43 Speaker 35: within a CIP programme that you

02:31:44 Speaker 35: could create to allow for reduced

02:31:46 Speaker 35: cost transfers of lands, for example,

02:31:48 Speaker 35: or for projects. Could be looking

02:31:51 Speaker 35: again at targeting and filling those

02:31:53 Speaker 35: gaps in the other early funding

02:31:55 Speaker 35: opportunities to try and bring life

02:31:58 Speaker 35: to those projects that might otherwise

02:32:00 Speaker 35: struggle in the early phases. And

02:32:02 Speaker 35: then I think there is a

02:32:04 Speaker 35: great opportunity to to be looking

02:32:06 Speaker 35: at the at upper tier CIP

02:32:08 Speaker 35: in the context of there also

02:32:11 Speaker 35: being lower tier CIPs and. how

02:32:13 Speaker 35: does that work together, and how

02:32:15 Speaker 35: do we tailor the staffing around

02:32:20 Speaker 35: those CIP incentives? And so, I

02:32:21 Speaker 35: think there's a great opportunity to

02:32:22 Speaker 35: figure out how do we design

02:32:24 Speaker 35: that so that we can work

02:32:26 Speaker 35: together. So, we're bringing this forward

02:32:27 Speaker 35: not with a CIP prepared and

02:32:30 Speaker 35: ready to go, but suggesting that

02:32:32 Speaker 35: if if council would have an

02:32:33 Speaker 35: interest in pursuing an upper tier

02:32:36 Speaker 35: CIP, now might be an opportune

02:32:38 Speaker 35: time to. express that intent. We

02:32:39 Speaker 35: are undertaking the development charges background

02:32:41 Speaker 35: study, and so our thought was

02:32:44 Speaker 35: that if we were to receive

02:32:45 Speaker 35: endorsement to place this on the

02:32:48 Speaker 35: capital ten-year plan, we could be

02:32:50 Speaker 35: including some related costs within that

02:32:52 Speaker 35: development charges background study for funding

02:32:53 Speaker 35: at that future date when we

02:32:57 Speaker 35: pick up this project moving forward.

02:33:00 Speaker 35: We're anticipating, as well, from an

02:33:02 Speaker 35: alignment standpoint, that next year is

02:33:04 Speaker 35: likely the year that we'll be

02:33:06 Speaker 35: getting into an update to the.

02:33:07 Speaker 35: county official plan, and beginning that

02:33:09 Speaker 35: process, and so we'll also be

02:33:12 Speaker 35: getting census data next year as

02:33:14 Speaker 35: well. And so I think there's

02:33:16 Speaker 35: potentially some alignment to be looking

02:33:18 Speaker 35: at the policy framework, the updated

02:33:21 Speaker 35: data that might help us target

02:33:23 Speaker 35: that CIP and be thinking about

02:33:26 Speaker 35: where that CIP then ultimately goes

02:33:28 Speaker 35: in terms of design when we

02:33:29 Speaker 35: get there. So I have suggested

02:33:31 Speaker 35: within the report that I think

02:33:34 Speaker 35: there are some things that we

02:33:37 Speaker 35: do need to do in considering.

02:33:38 Speaker 35: a plan at the upper tier

02:33:41 Speaker 35: level, I've suggested that we phase

02:33:43 Speaker 35: this project in the following ways.

02:33:46 Speaker 35: So, first off, starting with some

02:33:49 Speaker 35: analysis of this background data, trends,

02:33:51 Speaker 35: needs, and gaps. The evaluation

02:33:54 Speaker 35: then of capacity considerations.

02:33:55 Speaker 35: So, who is delivering it at

02:33:59 Speaker 35: the county level? Staff resources. You

02:34:01 Speaker 35: know, all of the people that

02:34:03 Speaker 35: touch that. Making sure that that

02:34:05 Speaker 35: we're adequately resourced, and then the

02:34:07 Speaker 35: actual development. of the programme itself,

02:34:09 Speaker 35: right through to the delivery of

02:34:12 Speaker 35: that bylaw for implementation. And so,

02:34:14 Speaker 35: what we've suggested within the financial

02:34:15 Speaker 35: section of the report is that

02:34:17 Speaker 35: we would look at likely those

02:34:19 Speaker 35: items A and B being an

02:34:20 Speaker 35: in-house activity where staff is doing

02:34:21 Speaker 35: that investigation and targeting, and then

02:34:23 Speaker 35: potentially engaging some consulting resources to

02:34:25 Speaker 35: help with the actual programme design.

02:34:29 Speaker 35: There are CIPS across Ontario, and

02:34:31 Speaker 35: so our thought is that there

02:34:34 Speaker 35: may be some. opportunities to to

02:34:36 Speaker 35: glean from those consulting some of

02:34:39 Speaker 35: those examples we may haven't engaged

02:34:41 Speaker 35: with elsewhere, but also then being

02:34:42 Speaker 35: able to bring that in as

02:34:44 Speaker 35: a cost for some cost recovery

02:34:46 Speaker 35: through the development charges on a

02:34:50 Speaker 35: consulting basis. In designing the CIP,

02:34:52 Speaker 35: and again just a little foreshadowing

02:34:53 Speaker 36: of where we think we might

02:35:00 Speaker 36: go if council were on board,

02:35:06 Speaker 36: you know we would really want

02:35:09 Speaker 37: to be considering those types of

02:35:12 Speaker 37: projects and organisations that. could be

02:35:14 Speaker 13: incented through that programme, we would

02:35:17 Speaker 13: want to use data informed approaches

02:35:21 Speaker 13: because I think resources are limited

02:35:25 Speaker 13: all around, and so we'd want

02:35:30 Speaker 13: to be putting those incentives towards

02:35:33 Speaker 13: the specific projects that need that

02:35:34 Speaker 13: help. We'd want to direct the

02:35:37 Speaker 13: incentives towards the most impactful stage

02:35:39 Speaker 13: of development, and then look at

02:35:44 Speaker 13: scaling of those incentives. So, you

02:35:45 Speaker 13: know, I think the juice needs

02:35:48 Speaker 13: to be worth the squeeze for

02:35:51 Speaker 35: those development proponents. So, you know,

02:35:54 Speaker 35: if it's a matching fund grant,

02:35:57 Speaker 35: capping out at you know seven

02:35:59 Speaker 35: thousand dollars on a forty million

02:36:01 Speaker 35: dollar housing project, that's a very

02:36:03 Speaker 35: small drop in the bucket. But

02:36:06 Speaker 35: if we were able to offer

02:36:07 Speaker 35: a slightly more meaningful incentive at

02:36:09 Speaker 35: a key stage where there aren't

02:36:10 Speaker 35: other resources, we see you

02:36:13 Speaker 35: know being able to match the

02:36:16 Speaker 35: scale with that usability or or

02:36:19 Speaker 35: interest by the developers to take

02:36:22 Speaker 35: that. And then again, looking at

02:36:24 Speaker 35: that alignment with the. local CIPs,

02:36:27 Speaker 35: so I just wanted to mention

02:36:28 Speaker 35: here that we have had various

02:36:30 Speaker 35: discussions with local staff, and so

02:36:32 Speaker 35: we'd had a chat with UDOs

02:36:35 Speaker 35: earlier in the year, and I

02:36:37 Speaker 35: guess my takeaway from that was

02:36:38 Speaker 35: each of our municipalities is very

02:36:40 Speaker 35: differently resourced with capacity to deliver

02:36:41 Speaker 35: the CIPs, and so those types

02:36:43 Speaker 35: of initiatives that have agreements or

02:36:45 Speaker 35: monitoring conditions over time, like affordability

02:36:47 Speaker 35: conditions, that. Affordability conditions—that type of

02:36:49 Speaker 35: thing—may be challenging to accommodate in

02:36:50 Speaker 35: that local resourcing. So again, there

02:36:53 Speaker 35: might be that opportunity to explore,

02:36:54 Speaker 35: you know, what tools are sitting

02:36:57 Speaker 35: in a county CIP versus the

02:36:59 Speaker 35: local. How are those working together?

02:37:01 Speaker 35: Maybe the the county is, you

02:37:03 Speaker 35: know, biting off a bigger chunk

02:37:05 Speaker 35: with those affordable housing ones, which

02:37:07 Speaker 35: allows the locals to focus a

02:37:08 Speaker 35: little more on FDEV or those

02:37:09 Speaker 35: types of initiatives. So just to

02:37:11 Speaker 35: say that I think there's a

02:37:13 Speaker 35: conversation there that we could explore.

02:37:17 Speaker 35: That we explore around, you know,

02:37:19 Speaker 35: how we want to align those

02:37:21 Speaker 35: those IPs. So just back to

02:37:23 Speaker 35: the beginning, the staff recommendation. So

02:37:25 Speaker 35: as noted, we provided a report

02:37:31 Speaker 35: that outlines all of this information,

02:37:34 Speaker 35: and our staff recommendation would be

02:37:36 Speaker 35: that we would proceed to put

02:37:40 Speaker 35: this on the capital plan and

02:37:43 Speaker 35: into development charges. Background study, it's

02:37:46 Speaker 22: not just brief. There, thank you.

02:37:47 Speaker 22: Thank you. So with that, I

02:37:50 Speaker 22: will look to committee. the whole

02:37:52 Speaker 22: members for questions or comments. Councillor

02:37:54 Speaker 22: Dobrin, thank you, Warden, and thank

02:37:55 Speaker 22: you, Liz. I read this with

02:37:58 Speaker 22: great interest, and I know that

02:37:59 Speaker 22: at previously the county was looking

02:38:03 Speaker 22: at doing a land inventory to

02:38:05 Speaker 22: see which lands might be available

02:38:07 Speaker 22: for. affordable housing development that we

02:38:08 Speaker 22: could partner with other organisations. Would

02:38:10 Speaker 22: that land inventory play a role

02:38:14 Speaker 22: in this community improvement plan, as

02:38:15 Speaker 22: opposed to a financial incentive? There

02:38:16 Speaker 22: would be that that transfer of

02:38:19 Speaker 22: land or land lease or that

02:38:21 Speaker 22: type of thing. Thank you, and

02:38:24 Speaker 22: through to you, Madam Warden. Yes,

02:38:27 Speaker 22: so you know, I think. there

02:38:28 Speaker 22: are some interesting rules around municipal

02:38:29 Speaker 22: lands and associated marketing, and so

02:38:30 Speaker 22: you have to be of the

02:38:31 Speaker 22: same organisation to be able to

02:38:32 Speaker 22: do marketing for lands within your

02:38:35 Speaker 22: municipal ownership. So there's some some

02:38:36 Speaker 22: legislative rules around that, and so

02:38:38 Speaker 22: I think one of the ways

02:38:41 Speaker 22: that a CIP can can assist

02:38:41 Speaker 22: is where you do have those

02:38:43 Speaker 22: surplus lands inventoryed as as potential

02:38:44 Speaker 22: opportunities for affordable housing. Sorry about

02:38:45 Speaker 22: that. If we did. get a

02:38:50 Speaker 22: proposal come in where you know

02:38:50 Speaker 22: somebody wanted to to uptake one

02:38:52 Speaker 22: of those surplus properties under the

02:38:53 Speaker 22: Municipal Act, you'd normally be dealing

02:38:54 Speaker 22: with a kind of market rate

02:38:56 Speaker 22: or for those lands or or

02:38:58 Speaker 22: an appraised value. Under a CIP,

02:38:59 Speaker 22: where you're looking at community-based objectives

02:39:02 Speaker 22: that you're trying to achieve, and

02:39:04 Speaker 35: you can place conditions and agreements

02:39:06 Speaker 35: around that, you may be able

02:39:09 Speaker 35: to transfer those lands at a

02:39:12 Speaker 35: low market rate. So as part

02:39:13 Speaker 35: of a portfolio, a Part of

02:39:15 Speaker 35: a portfolio of a partnership or

02:39:17 Speaker 35: or an agreement in that way.

02:39:20 Speaker 35: So I think those two tools

02:39:22 Speaker 35: work really well together, hand in

02:39:23 Speaker 35: hand. And as well, there are

02:39:24 Speaker 35: some provisions that allow for transfer

02:39:26 Speaker 35: between organisations as well. So, you

02:39:28 Speaker 35: know, if a local municipality, for

02:39:32 Speaker 35: example, was partnering with the county,

02:39:33 Speaker 35: you know, could we transfer those

02:39:35 Speaker 35: lands and deal with them at

02:39:37 Speaker 35: below market rate? We would both

02:39:39 Speaker 35: then have the ability to kind

02:39:40 Speaker 35: of play in that same sandbox.

02:39:42 Speaker 18: Whereas right now, the county is

02:39:44 Speaker 18: limited in that regard. whereas the

02:39:45 Speaker 18: CIP power fits with the local

02:39:48 Speaker 18: municipalities in dealing with those lands

02:39:50 Speaker 18: that way. So, yes, and I

02:39:52 Speaker 18: think big opportunity to explore that

02:39:53 Speaker 18: even further. Thank you. Okay, anything

02:39:56 Speaker 18: else, Councillor Nielsen? Thank you very

02:39:57 Speaker 18: much, Ward and Matrosov. I'm just

02:40:00 Speaker 18: trying to wrap my head around

02:40:01 Speaker 18: the DC combination. So, the report

02:40:02 Speaker 18: is suggesting that. if we incorporate

02:40:04 Speaker 18: the county CIP into the DC

02:40:07 Speaker 18: study, we can use DC study

02:40:08 Speaker 18: funds—sorry, DC funds—to fund the study

02:40:12 Speaker 18: to build and implement the CIP,

02:40:13 Speaker 18: but not actually fund the CIP

02:40:15 Speaker 18: once it's constructed. I guess I

02:40:17 Speaker 18: have two questions, kind of on

02:40:20 Speaker 18: how that might work. One is

02:40:21 Speaker 18: what the possible impact is into

02:40:24 Speaker 18: the DC charges itself, as in,

02:40:27 Speaker 18: like, how much are we thinking

02:40:30 Speaker 18: it's going to cost to build

02:40:32 Speaker 18: the study out, and two would

02:40:35 Speaker 18: be with I don't know if

02:40:37 Speaker 18: it's kind of died down, but

02:40:40 Speaker 18: there's still the provincial and federal

02:40:42 Speaker 18: comments around development charges and and

02:40:44 Speaker 18: just wondering if there's concern about

02:40:45 Speaker 18: we're trying to add extra studies

02:40:47 Speaker 18: into development charges while at the

02:40:49 Speaker 18: same time the province and the

02:40:52 Speaker 18: feds are really trying to say

02:40:54 Speaker 18: you shouldn't have development charges or

02:40:56 Speaker 18: you should limit them. And I'm

02:40:56 Speaker 18: just trying to understand that correlation

02:40:58 Speaker 18: and just how this might work

02:41:01 Speaker 18: for the CIP, where like I

02:41:04 Speaker 18: fully support the concept of using

02:41:06 Speaker 18: the CIP. building it out, and

02:41:09 Speaker 18: funding it so we can support

02:41:12 Speaker 18: affordable housing, but it's kind of

02:41:13 Speaker 18: tricky to me in just how

02:41:16 Speaker 18: we're using that through development charges

02:41:18 Speaker 18: portion. And through you, and so

02:41:20 Speaker 18: I think I may bite off

02:41:22 Speaker 18: the first chunk of that, and

02:41:23 Speaker 18: then I might look back to

02:41:25 Speaker 18: Scott to take it in on

02:41:27 Speaker 18: on that as well. So, in

02:41:28 Speaker 18: terms of impact to DCs, so

02:41:30 Speaker 18: I think what we've identified within

02:41:35 Speaker 18: the report was you're marking about

02:41:38 Speaker 18: fifty thousand dollars for that kind

02:41:39 Speaker 18: of part C and D of

02:41:43 Speaker 18: of the work plan. it's a

02:41:47 Speaker 18: ballpark, right? We're we're trying to

02:41:49 Speaker 33: kind of get a good sense

02:41:52 Speaker 33: of of where we might land

02:41:53 Speaker 33: for a consultant to to engage

02:41:55 Speaker 33: with us. So, fifty thousand dollars

02:41:58 Speaker 33: is fifty thousand dollars, right? It

02:42:02 Speaker 33: may have an impact, but I

02:42:08 Speaker 33: just to give you a good

02:42:11 Speaker 33: idea of scale. And then I'll

02:42:12 Speaker 33: turn my mic off and and

02:42:15 Speaker 33: pass it over to Director. Yeah,

02:42:19 Speaker 33: thanks, Liz, and and through Madam

02:42:21 Speaker 33: Warden to Councillor Nielsen. So we

02:42:24 Speaker 33: are working with Hemson right now

02:42:27 Speaker 33: on our development charges. Right now,

02:42:28 Speaker 33: on our development charge background study,

02:42:31 Speaker 33: and and because the county has

02:42:32 Speaker 33: never had the ability to do

02:42:35 Speaker 33: a CAP before, as said until

02:42:36 Speaker 33: Bill sixty, you know, one of

02:42:39 Speaker 33: the first questions early on was,

02:42:41 Speaker 33: is this something that that that

02:42:43 Speaker 33: we could charge DCs for? And

02:42:46 Speaker 33: what Hemson shared in that regard

02:42:49 Speaker 33: is, is a portion of it

02:42:51 Speaker 33: would be DC eligible. With any

02:42:56 Speaker 33: development charge, you need to look

02:42:58 Speaker 33: at what is the growth related

02:43:00 Speaker 33: aspect of that. So so it

02:43:03 Speaker 33: might not be the entire fifty

02:43:05 Speaker 33: thousand, but but we could we

02:43:08 Speaker 33: could work with Hemson to establish.

02:43:09 Speaker 33: Work with Hempton to establish that

02:43:11 Speaker 33: calculation. But when you're doing your

02:43:13 Speaker 33: development charges background study, simply put,

02:43:16 Speaker 33: it's it's not a wish list,

02:43:19 Speaker 33: and and it's definitely not a

02:43:22 Speaker 33: staff wish list. There has to

02:43:26 Speaker 33: be intent through previous master plans,

02:43:28 Speaker 33: or capital budgets, or capital plans

02:43:30 Speaker 33: in that regard that council has

02:43:32 Speaker 33: endorsed before we can even consider

02:43:34 Speaker 33: it in in the the background

02:43:35 Speaker 33: study. And that background study is

02:43:37 Speaker 33: is sort of the complex analysis

02:43:40 Speaker 33: you go through to to provide.

02:43:42 Speaker 33: in this case the future council

02:43:44 Speaker 33: the information of of what the

02:43:46 Speaker 33: county development charges would be starting

02:43:47 Speaker 33: in in you know later in

02:43:48 Speaker 33: twenty seven and and beyond kind

02:43:51 Speaker 33: of thing and council has the

02:43:53 Speaker 33: option of of adopting a bylaw

02:43:54 Speaker 33: with those charges or going with

02:43:56 Speaker 33: lesser charges so if council were

02:43:57 Speaker 33: to support this recommendation today essentially

02:44:01 Speaker 33: what it would allow staff to

02:44:03 Speaker 33: do is to go back to

02:44:05 Speaker 33: Hemson and said yes council is

02:44:08 Speaker 33: is interested in a development charges

02:44:12 Speaker 33: in a upper tier community improvement

02:44:14 Speaker 33: plan, we would include a portion

02:44:16 Speaker 33: of that cost of the fifty

02:44:18 Speaker 33: thousand in the background study, and

02:44:20 Speaker 33: and then that background study would

02:44:25 Speaker 33: ultimately come back to to council

02:44:28 Speaker 33: for for their approval. The project

02:44:33 Speaker 33: would have to be added in

02:44:36 Speaker 33: future years' capital budgets as well.

02:44:40 Speaker 33: So you know, although this is

02:44:42 Speaker 33: an early preview to council, this

02:44:45 Speaker 33: isn't sort of council committing a

02:44:48 Speaker 35: hundred percent. There still be that

02:44:50 Speaker 35: opportunity to reassess down the road.

02:44:51 Speaker 35: Sorry for the long winded answer.

02:44:53 Speaker 35: The long-winded answer. Excellent, good teamwork.

02:44:56 Speaker 35: We'll go to Councillor Greg. I

02:44:58 Speaker 35: guess I just need a little

02:45:00 Speaker 35: bit more clarity, Liz, on where

02:45:01 Speaker 35: we're at. The report does state

02:45:04 Speaker 35: maintain, and there's an enhancement component

02:45:07 Speaker 35: in the same sentence. I just

02:45:10 Speaker 35: heard in the past the county

02:45:12 Speaker 35: was not in the position to

02:45:13 Speaker 35: do CIP programme, but the report

02:45:17 Speaker 35: clearly states maintain. So, have we

02:45:19 Speaker 35: been in there? I'm concerned with

02:45:20 Speaker 35: it's very simple, fifty thousand dollars.

02:45:22 Speaker 35: But as a project within the

02:45:24 Speaker 35: ten-year capital budget, what does this

02:45:26 Speaker 35: morph to? I find there is

02:45:28 Speaker 35: somewhat of a lack of clarity.

02:45:32 Speaker 35: It's a little bit dreamy. The

02:45:34 Speaker 35: aspirations, whereas engineering services could say,

02:45:35 Speaker 35: if you don't invest in that

02:45:38 Speaker 35: bridge. it's going to collapse. Or

02:45:39 Speaker 35: housing is, if you don't

02:45:41 Speaker 35: fix that elevator, your senior residences

02:45:43 Speaker 35: are walking up four flights of

02:45:45 Speaker 35: stairs, and you don't want that.

02:45:46 Speaker 35: I'm not sure where this is

02:45:48 Speaker 35: going. And as long as we're

02:45:50 Speaker 35: delivering four, five, six, seven plus

02:45:52 Speaker 35: two, two point five percent in

02:45:55 Speaker 35: growth every year in tax increases,

02:45:59 Speaker 35: I heard you say it. Resources

02:46:01 Speaker 35: are limited, but if we're delivering.

02:46:03 Speaker 35: five, six, seven plus growth every

02:46:06 Speaker 35: year, we're not acknowledging that resources

02:46:10 Speaker 35: are limited for people. That's those

02:46:11 Speaker 35: are tax increases that are not

02:46:13 Speaker 35: sustainable, and that's where we've been

02:46:16 Speaker 35: at, and that's where we're currently

02:46:18 Speaker 35: projecting ourselves. So I'd like to

02:46:20 Speaker 35: hear more clarity, I guess, on

02:46:22 Speaker 35: what is the vision here, because

02:46:25 Speaker 35: I the report right now, I'm

02:46:27 Speaker 35: concerned with we can't afford a.

02:46:29 Speaker 35: grandiose vision that's not coming through

02:46:30 Speaker 35: in in the pages here yet.

02:46:33 Speaker 35: I also we do a I

02:46:35 Speaker 35: think as lower tier municipalities where

02:46:37 Speaker 35: we have them, some of the

02:46:38 Speaker 35: CIP programmemes are very good. There's

02:46:42 Speaker 35: some great initiatives in there. Flip

02:46:45 Speaker 35: side of that is some of

02:46:47 Speaker 35: them almost are window dressing. Perhaps

02:46:48 Speaker 35: on Main Street, and then somebody

02:46:50 Speaker 35: can buy the building and they

02:46:51 Speaker 35: have a new vision and they

02:46:52 Speaker 35: rip out the taxpayer funded investment

02:46:55 Speaker 35: that just took place a couple

02:46:58 Speaker 35: years prior under new ownership. and

02:47:00 Speaker 35: it's not a lot different than

02:47:02 Speaker 35: some of the the reference that

02:47:04 Speaker 35: was in a report that we

02:47:06 Speaker 35: approved regarding a forest clearing portion

02:47:08 Speaker 35: of land where it was funded

02:47:11 Speaker 35: by taxpayers in previous years, and

02:47:13 Speaker 35: we just approved wiping that out.

02:47:17 Speaker 35: That's a concern. How do we

02:47:19 Speaker 35: protect that? I feel like a

02:47:21 Speaker 35: lot of CIP is perhaps best

02:47:24 Speaker 35: delivered at the local municipal level,

02:47:28 Speaker 35: and I have a lot of

02:47:30 Speaker 35: trepidation. that we are walking into

02:47:31 Speaker 35: this at the at the county

02:47:34 Speaker 35: level. Thank you. There's a lot

02:47:37 Speaker 35: there. So maintain. I'll just I'll

02:47:39 Speaker 35: start there. So you know I

02:47:40 Speaker 35: think when the housing action plan

02:47:43 Speaker 35: was was first developed, we were

02:47:46 Speaker 35: aware that some upper tiers had

02:47:47 Speaker 35: CIPs, but we knew that it

02:47:49 Speaker 35: would. be a process if we

02:47:51 Speaker 35: were interested to kind of have

02:47:54 Speaker 35: explore that tool for ourselves. So

02:47:57 Speaker 35: I think the the way that

02:48:00 Speaker 35: the Housing Action Plan addresses that

02:48:03 Speaker 35: is, you know, we talked about

02:48:05 Speaker 35: maintaining and and supporting that ongoing

02:48:07 Speaker 35: CIP programme, so administratively delivered at

02:48:10 Speaker 35: the county level, and actioned through

02:48:11 Speaker 35: the local CIP bylaws because that's

02:48:12 Speaker 35: the tools that we had available

02:48:14 Speaker 35: to us to deliver that portfolio.

02:48:16 Speaker 35: With Bill sixty, that changes. and

02:48:18 Speaker 35: now we do have the ability

02:48:20 Speaker 35: to have that tool. So, you

02:48:21 Speaker 35: know, I think there was general

02:48:24 Speaker 35: commentary in the Housing Action Plan

02:48:26 Speaker 35: around the complementary incentives and finances

02:48:28 Speaker 35: to offer support and and maintain

02:48:31 Speaker 35: that CIP programme. So, I have,

02:48:33 Speaker 35: you're right, I've taken some licence

02:48:33 Speaker 35: to say that we've talked about

02:48:35 Speaker 35: the CIP in the Housing Action

02:48:36 Speaker 35: Plan around maintaining and enhancing and

02:48:38 Speaker 35: delivering complementary incentives. I've made the

02:48:40 Speaker 35: logical jump to say that, and

02:48:43 Speaker 35: now that CIP tool is available

02:48:44 Speaker 35: at the county level, but that.

02:48:47 Speaker 35: About the county level, but that

02:48:49 Speaker 35: it's under that portfolio. But when

02:48:51 Speaker 35: I brought the housing action plan

02:48:53 Speaker 35: update report last November, there had

02:48:55 Speaker 35: been some commentary in there around

02:48:56 Speaker 35: that there was a draft of

02:48:58 Speaker 35: that that legislation, and that we

02:48:59 Speaker 35: thought that that tool would

02:49:02 Speaker 35: become available. Excuse me. Initially, saw

02:49:04 Speaker 35: some direction to explore that process

02:49:09 Speaker 35: to get the CIP. So, you

02:49:10 Speaker 35: know, I think all of that

02:49:13 Speaker 35: is natural evolution of of what.

02:49:14 Speaker 38: was identified in the CIP and

02:49:15 Speaker 38: through subsequent discussions with them as

02:49:17 Speaker 38: well around pursuing that potential tool,

02:49:19 Speaker 38: but I think that you know

02:49:21 Speaker 38: you're right. Resourcing is limited, so

02:49:23 Speaker 38: you know the sky doesn't fall

02:49:25 Speaker 38: if we don't have a CIP,

02:49:26 Speaker 18: but I think it's about what

02:49:28 Speaker 18: it could be used for, and

02:49:29 Speaker 18: so I struggle to stand here

02:49:31 Speaker 18: and give you the whole vision

02:49:33 Speaker 18: because it is big. I have

02:49:36 Speaker 18: been working on reporting. around kind

02:49:38 Speaker 18: of bigger vision, but I guess

02:49:39 Speaker 18: what I would say is, you

02:49:42 Speaker 18: know, through the Housing Action Plan

02:49:44 Speaker 18: and all of the learning that

02:49:46 Speaker 18: we've been doing around capacity building

02:49:49 Speaker 18: for affordable housing and non-profit developers,

02:49:50 Speaker 18: what we really heard back is

02:49:53 Speaker 18: that different developers do different types

02:49:54 Speaker 18: of housing, and they have access

02:49:57 Speaker 18: to different tools. They have access

02:49:59 Speaker 18: to different financial tools. They're resourced

02:50:02 Speaker 18: very differently in terms of their

02:50:03 Speaker 18: capital readiness, and the market is—it's

02:50:04 Speaker 18: not market developers. It's not market

02:50:07 Speaker 18: developers that are creating the affordable,

02:50:09 Speaker 18: deeply affordable housing, and so you

02:50:11 Speaker 18: know I see this as an

02:50:12 Speaker 18: opportunity for us to be really

02:50:15 Speaker 18: noodling in on like exactly where

02:50:16 Speaker 18: are those barriers to our nonprofits

02:50:19 Speaker 18: at the scale that we have

02:50:20 Speaker 18: in our local area engaging around

02:50:23 Speaker 18: a surplus land offering or a

02:50:26 Speaker 18: project, even in partnership, to try

02:50:28 Speaker 18: and get an affordable component of

02:50:30 Speaker 18: the units in, because. It's

02:50:31 Speaker 18: in because different types of developers

02:50:33 Speaker 18: do different types of projects. So,

02:50:36 Speaker 18: you know, when you pull all

02:50:37 Speaker 18: that together, what we hear is

02:50:39 Speaker 18: that the barriers are early access

02:50:41 Speaker 18: to capital in the ideation and

02:50:47 Speaker 18: the site preparation stages of development,

02:50:51 Speaker 18: and there aren't great seed funding

02:50:54 Speaker 18: grants available now. There, the the

02:50:55 Speaker 18: federal programme has changed significantly and

02:50:58 Speaker 33: is really available at the later

02:51:00 Speaker 33: stages of a fully cooked project,

02:51:02 Speaker 33: and so. you know, I think

02:51:04 Speaker 33: we're just trying to figure out

02:51:05 Speaker 33: that piece of how do we

02:51:10 Speaker 33: get those right tools at the

02:51:13 Speaker 33: right stage for the right players

02:51:16 Speaker 33: to make that happen. And it's

02:51:18 Speaker 33: in the weeds, and it's very

02:51:21 Speaker 33: niche. But I think if the

02:51:23 Speaker 33: market could create the affordable housing

02:51:26 Speaker 33: that we need without incentives, we

02:51:27 Speaker 33: would have it. So I really

02:51:31 Speaker 33: put this forward as as a

02:51:33 Speaker 33: tool that I think would be

02:51:36 Speaker 33: very helpful to us. But I

02:51:39 Speaker 33: think there are a number of

02:51:41 Speaker 33: stages ahead, right? Like, I think

02:51:42 Speaker 33: we. would be reporting back to

02:51:45 Speaker 33: council on that A and B

02:51:48 Speaker 33: activities before we ever get to

02:51:50 Speaker 33: the consulting to do the sequencing.

02:51:51 Speaker 33: At that future stage, I think

02:51:55 Speaker 33: that we could develop a CIP

02:51:58 Speaker 33: programme and then decide budgetarily. We're

02:52:01 Speaker 33: not ready to implement it this

02:52:03 Speaker 33: year. We'll earmark the money for

02:52:05 Speaker 33: next year. So there there will

02:52:08 Speaker 33: be lots of decision points. I

02:52:09 Speaker 33: think for those further targeting and

02:52:10 Speaker 22: resourcing discussions to happen. So I'll

02:52:11 Speaker 22: leave it there. But happy to

02:52:15 Speaker 22: to continue. Chicken soup. Okay, and

02:52:18 Speaker 22: we'll go to Director Taylor for

02:52:20 Speaker 22: follow up. Thank you, Madam Moore.

02:52:22 Speaker 22: And I think just very briefly

02:52:23 Speaker 22: to build on what Liz said,

02:52:26 Speaker 22: any CIP, whether municipal or or

02:52:27 Speaker 22: upper tier, acts as as sort

02:52:29 Speaker 22: of a menu of incentives, and

02:52:30 Speaker 22: and any given council can choose,

02:52:32 Speaker 22: you know, which which items they

02:52:33 Speaker 22: want to put on the menu

02:52:35 Speaker 22: versus which are too extravagant and

02:52:38 Speaker 22: wouldn't fit the menu. And and

02:52:40 Speaker 22: so in this case, the county's

02:52:41 Speaker 22: menu we can offer is pretty

02:52:42 Speaker 22: much related to affordable housing, and

02:52:44 Speaker 22: and. so while as municipalities you

02:52:46 Speaker 22: all have broad menus and you

02:52:47 Speaker 22: can do things like brownfields or

02:52:48 Speaker 22: downtown you know facade improvements and

02:52:50 Speaker 22: everything else we would have to

02:52:55 Speaker 22: be very very targeted legislatively to

02:52:56 Speaker 22: to a lot of what Liz

02:53:00 Speaker 22: is describing with respect to to

02:53:04 Speaker 22: the housing and and so she's

02:53:05 Speaker 22: completely right you know this is

02:53:06 Speaker 22: somewhat aspirational because we were only

02:53:08 Speaker 22: given this legislative ability late last

02:53:10 Speaker 22: year we don't have a lot

02:53:12 Speaker 35: to go from just yet in

02:53:13 Speaker 35: terms of you know. there's not

02:53:14 Speaker 35: 30 other municipalities with an affordable

02:53:16 Speaker 35: housing CIP in in the province.

02:53:18 Speaker 35: So we we would need to

02:53:19 Speaker 35: do some further work. We would

02:53:21 Speaker 35: need to report back to council

02:53:23 Speaker 35: and and at some point need

02:53:25 Speaker 35: to further flesh out you know

02:53:30 Speaker 35: what what funding a CIP could

02:53:32 Speaker 35: look like. So this is very

02:53:33 Speaker 35: early stages, but certainly respect the

02:53:35 Speaker 35: pressures that that both you as

02:53:37 Speaker 35: as county councillors and municipal

02:53:40 Speaker 35: councillors are under with all the

02:53:43 Speaker 35: other things that are legislatively required

02:53:46 Speaker 35: and so. Legislatively required, and as

02:53:48 Speaker 35: Liz said, this isn't legislatively required.

02:53:51 Speaker 35: We do think it could be

02:53:52 Speaker 35: a useful tool to to help

02:53:54 Speaker 35: laser in on on some of

02:53:57 Speaker 35: those housing incentives that might be

02:54:01 Speaker 35: useful. Follow up. Thank you. And

02:54:04 Speaker 35: you mentioned some upper tier levels

02:54:06 Speaker 35: of government have some initiatives already

02:54:07 Speaker 33: in place. It might be I

02:54:10 Speaker 33: would enjoy seeing some examples in

02:54:12 Speaker 33: the report. So perhaps that's something

02:54:13 Speaker 33: that can be. emailed out to

02:54:15 Speaker 33: council. Just some references where we

02:54:22 Speaker 33: can access some of those resources,

02:54:24 Speaker 33: because certainly point two moves this

02:54:26 Speaker 33: forward. So when it becomes a

02:54:26 Speaker 33: budget discussion, the council of whomever

02:54:28 Speaker 33: is sitting there has a little

02:54:31 Speaker 33: bit more background to be able

02:54:32 Speaker 33: to see what types of initiatives

02:54:36 Speaker 35: have been in place and then

02:54:37 Speaker 35: evaluate on that, as opposed to

02:54:39 Speaker 35: here's your. budget. What do you

02:54:41 Speaker 35: think? Then your the the council

02:54:47 Speaker 35: is more informed. I guess I'll

02:54:50 Speaker 35: leave it there. I it's good

02:54:51 Speaker 35: to support, but I don't think

02:54:53 Speaker 35: we want to get into the

02:54:56 Speaker 35: banking business. It's good to work

02:54:58 Speaker 15: with banking, but our role is

02:55:07 Speaker 15: not to get too deep within

02:55:09 Speaker 15: the banking industry. I think in

02:55:11 Speaker 15: terms of funding some endeavors. Some.

02:55:13 Speaker 15: Okay. Thank you. We'll go to

02:55:16 Speaker 15: Councillor Nielsen. Thank you again, Ward

02:55:17 Speaker 15: Matrasoff, and I think Councillor Greg

02:55:18 Speaker 15: stirred some questions in my own

03:38:31 Speaker 15: mind. Currently, the county, as part

03:38:33 Speaker 15: of our budget, puts money into

03:38:34 Speaker 03: affordable housing every year, but we

03:38:36 Speaker 15: have rules and restrictions to how

03:38:38 Speaker 15: we can support nonprofits and groups

03:38:41 Speaker 15: and organisations with that. So, you

03:38:42 Speaker 15: know, hearing Councillor Greg's first question

03:38:44 Speaker 15: is really about what is that

03:38:46 Speaker 15: financial impact to a budget line

03:38:48 Speaker 15: later. The CIP might, moreover, just

03:38:51 Speaker 15: allow us. to have different rules

03:38:56 Speaker 15: that allow us to utilise the

03:38:58 Speaker 15: funding we're already putting away. We

03:39:00 Speaker 15: know that six hundred thousand dollars

03:39:02 Speaker 15: a year isn't going to buy

03:39:04 Speaker 15: us one unit in affordable housing

03:39:07 Speaker 15: for the county, but six hundred

03:39:10 Speaker 15: thousand dollars can help support the

03:39:12 Speaker 15: acquisition of land for a nonprofit

03:39:14 Speaker 15: that could then turn it around.

03:39:16 Speaker 15: And currently, the rules are we

03:39:19 Speaker 15: can't do that. But utilising a

03:39:23 Speaker 15: CIP, we might be able to

03:39:24 Speaker 15: find an avenue to which we

03:39:26 Speaker 15: can support a nonprofit utilising the

03:39:28 Speaker 15: funds we are currently have. There's

03:39:29 Speaker 15: a question. in there. Thank you

03:39:32 Speaker 15: very much. It went up at

03:39:34 Speaker 15: the end. Yes, so I think

03:39:35 Speaker 15: I think it does. It would

03:39:40 Speaker 15: it would allow us to act

03:39:46 Speaker 15: more nimbly potentially with the dollars

03:39:48 Speaker 15: we have, and and I haven't

03:39:51 Speaker 15: had the conversation with Anne Marie

03:39:54 Speaker 15: in detail yet, and I did

03:39:55 Speaker 15: not want to speak to you

03:39:56 Speaker 39: know that levy fund and and

03:39:57 Speaker 39: seeking any claim to it, but

03:39:59 Speaker 39: I I do think you know

03:40:02 Speaker 39: we have those dollars. We're able

03:40:03 Speaker 39: to award them through partnership or

03:40:06 Speaker 39: flow through agreement. Partnership or flow

03:40:07 Speaker 39: through agreements or a capital facilities

03:40:10 Speaker 39: bylaw, but a CIP is is

03:40:12 Speaker 39: a much more flexible tool to

03:40:14 Speaker 39: be able to do that. And

03:40:18 Speaker 39: particularly, we have been working through

03:40:20 Speaker 39: evaluation of a few of our

03:40:22 Speaker 39: county properties, considering potential housing use

03:40:25 Speaker 39: and surplus opportunities. So again, just

03:40:26 Speaker 39: for partnership facilitation as well, to

03:40:28 Speaker 39: be able to to be incenting

03:40:30 Speaker 39: or waiving certain things at the

03:40:32 Speaker 39: county level, which. we don't have

03:40:34 Speaker 39: the ability to do right now

03:40:36 Speaker 39: through those agreements, so yes, enabling.

03:40:37 Speaker 39: Thank you. Okay. Anything further, Councillor

03:40:39 Speaker 39: Gray? That just triggered a thought.

03:40:40 Speaker 39: Is there a mechanism here where,

03:40:43 Speaker 39: if somebody wants to construct a

03:40:46 Speaker 39: nine thousand square foot home, you

03:40:49 Speaker 39: could place like a CIP tax

03:40:50 Speaker 39: on it and then put it

03:40:51 Speaker 39: into a reserve for redistribution into

03:40:53 Speaker 39: affordable housing? I mean, I'd like

03:40:56 Speaker 39: for your heads. I see Scott

03:40:58 Speaker 39: was reaching for his button there,

03:40:59 Speaker 39: so I don't know if you

03:41:01 Speaker 39: had a response in mind, but

03:41:05 Speaker 39: I'm not aware of that programme.

03:41:07 Speaker 39: But I'll pass along to Dr.

03:41:08 Speaker 39: Taylor. Okay. Yeah, ditto. I'm not

03:41:10 Speaker 39: aware of any legislative authority. It's

03:41:12 Speaker 39: something we could look into further

03:41:17 Speaker 39: with with legal services staff, but

03:41:18 Speaker 39: I'm not aware of anything there.

03:41:20 Speaker 39: Okay. Anything further? All right then,

03:41:23 Speaker 39: I'll call the question. All those

03:41:24 Speaker 39: in favour, and that motion is

03:41:25 Speaker 39: carried. Thank you very much, Planner

03:41:26 Speaker 39: Buckton. And we will be breaking

03:41:32 Speaker 39: for lunch now, and coming back

03:41:36 Speaker 40: at. Okay. Okay. So if I

03:41:39 Speaker 40: could call everybody back at 1:25,

03:41:41 Speaker 40: then we will carry on with

03:41:44 Speaker 40: the remainder of the item sevens,

03:41:47 Speaker 09: the two that were pulled from

03:41:49 Speaker 09: six, and then we do. Hold

03:41:50 Speaker 09: from six, and then we do

03:41:53 Speaker 09: have closed session as well. Thank

03:41:56 Speaker 09: you. Okay. thank you very much,

03:42:00 Speaker 09: everyone. We do have a quorum

03:42:06 Speaker 09: here around the table, and we

03:42:09 Speaker 09: are going to be continuing with

03:42:11 Speaker 09: item 7G. And with that, once

03:42:13 Speaker 09: we get it moved on the

03:42:14 Speaker 09: floor, we will then look to

03:42:16 Speaker 09: our interim director of finance and

03:42:25 Speaker 09: treasurer Murray to come and provide

03:42:27 Speaker 09: an introduction. So it's recommended that

7.g FR-CW-19-26 Heath Care Funding Request 2027 Budget

Council considered a motion to include a $175,000 request from Sogin Hospice Inc. for building a hospice in Gray County within the 2027 budget, funded over five years at $35,000 annually from the healthcare reserve without adding to the levy. Councillor Warder opposed the motion on principle, arguing healthcare is a provincial responsibility and taxpayers should not fund it indefinitely, while Councillor McLean supported the initiative as essential end-of-life care despite fiscal concerns regarding the province's delivery of services. Other councillors debated the policy requiring 20% residency for funded organisations and questioned past county contributions to Chapman House, with some advocating for continued local support while others called for scrutiny of long-term financial commitments. Council also considered a motion to approve an updated land acquisition and disposition policy that consolidates three separate documents into one. The new policy introduces a staff valuation method for land under $75,000 and increases compensation amounts in Schedule A to reflect current market conditions for road purposes. Additionally, the requirement for newspaper publication was removed from notice sections due to declining circulation and rising advertising costs, while specific exemptions remain for auctions and public tenders under $500,000.

03:42:31 Speaker 09: report FRCW 1926 Healthcare Funding Request

03:42:33 Speaker 09: 2027 Budget be received, and that

03:42:35 Speaker 09: staff be directed to maintain the

03:42:36 Speaker 09: budget. Be directed to maintain the

03:42:38 Speaker 09: budgeted two hundred thousand dollar transfer

03:42:41 Speaker 09: to the healthcare initiatives reserve for

03:42:42 Speaker 09: the twenty twenty seven budget and

03:42:44 Speaker 09: twenty twenty eight projected budgets, and

03:42:46 Speaker 07: that staff be directed to include

03:42:48 Speaker 07: the Sogin Hospice Inc. request of

03:42:50 Speaker 07: one hundred and seventy five thousand

03:42:53 Speaker 07: to be included for consideration in

03:42:57 Speaker 07: the twenty twenty seven to twenty

03:42:58 Speaker 07: twenty thirty one budgets of thirty

03:43:01 Speaker 07: five thousand dollars per year to

03:43:02 Speaker 07: be funded from the healthcare funding

03:43:04 Speaker 07: reserve. So, may I ask for

03:43:05 Speaker 07: a mover and a seconder? Let

03:43:06 Speaker 07: it move by Councillor Hutchinson, seconded

03:43:07 Speaker 07: by Councillor Dicker. It's now on

03:43:09 Speaker 07: the floor for discussion. And welcome,

03:43:11 Speaker 07: interim director of finance, Murray. Thank

03:43:13 Speaker 07: you, Andrew Newardon. As you are

03:43:14 Speaker 07: aware, in 2022, the Gray County

03:43:16 Speaker 07: did pass a health and healthcare

03:43:19 Speaker 07: funding policy, and the details are

03:43:21 Speaker 07: a little bit in the report.

03:43:22 Speaker 07: I won't go into that in

03:43:23 Speaker 07: my. narrative right now. But so

03:43:25 Speaker 07: we do ask that if there

03:43:27 Speaker 07: are any organisations that would request

03:43:28 Speaker 07: a donation, that it must be

03:43:29 Speaker 07: submitted by June 30th to us.

03:43:30 Speaker 07: And we did receive one formal

03:43:32 Speaker 07: request in December of 2025. They

03:43:36 Speaker 07: did do a formal presentation, and

03:43:44 Speaker 07: then Pablo got up with a

03:43:45 Speaker 41: written request for 175,000 to be

03:43:50 Speaker 41: funded over three to five years.

03:43:53 Speaker 17: There was request to help build

03:43:58 Speaker 17: a hospice in in Great. In

03:44:04 Speaker 17: in Gray County, in part of

03:44:09 Speaker 17: Gray County, so I have I

03:44:14 Speaker 17: am recommending that we include that

03:44:15 Speaker 17: in our budget for discussion. I

03:44:19 Speaker 17: am recommending that it be funded

03:44:22 Speaker 17: over five years, which would be

03:44:23 Speaker 17: thirty five thousand per year, to

03:44:27 Speaker 17: be funded out of our current

03:44:28 Speaker 17: healthcare reserve. So there would be

03:44:31 Speaker 17: no levy request added to the

03:44:34 Speaker 17: levy in twenty twenty seven. Our

03:44:38 Speaker 17: current reserve balance at the end

03:44:42 Speaker 17: of twenty twenty six is projected

03:44:44 Speaker 17: to be just a little over

03:44:46 Speaker 17: two hundred and twenty seven thousand,

03:44:50 Speaker 17: and at the end of 2027,

03:44:51 Speaker 17: if we were to include the

03:44:53 Speaker 17: thirty-five thousand dollars on top of

03:44:57 Speaker 17: the two hundred thousand that Gray

03:44:59 Speaker 17: County is already committed to for

03:45:03 Speaker 17: the Wellness and Recovery Centre for

03:45:05 Speaker 17: the Gravurs Health Services, that would

03:45:10 Speaker 17: leave us with a balance at

03:45:12 Speaker 17: the end of a 2027 proposed

03:45:18 Speaker 17: draft budget of 192,144 dollars. And

03:45:19 Speaker 17: that's all I was going to

03:45:22 Speaker 17: say today. If anyone, so I

03:45:25 Speaker 17: will turn it over for any

03:45:27 Speaker 17: questions. Thank you very much, and

03:45:27 Speaker 17: I'll look to committee. The whole

03:45:30 Speaker 17: members, if they have any questions

03:45:34 Speaker 17: on that plan, Deputy Warden. Thank

03:45:38 Speaker 17: you, Madam Warden, and thank you,

03:45:39 Speaker 17: Sue. I I'm going to say

03:45:42 Speaker 17: that I'm going to oppose the

03:45:46 Speaker 17: motion, but at the same time

03:45:48 Speaker 17: support the need for this facility.

03:45:51 Speaker 17: How long? And I'll ask a

03:45:53 Speaker 17: rhetorical question: How long are we

03:45:55 Speaker 17: going to let? the province off

03:45:58 Speaker 17: the hook? Healthcare is a provincial

03:46:01 Speaker 17: responsibility. It is not the responsibility

03:46:03 Speaker 17: of the land taxpayer, property taxpayer.

03:46:08 Speaker 17: I guess that's the gist of

03:46:11 Speaker 17: my my my words. I I

03:46:13 Speaker 17: just can't support this. The province

03:46:15 Speaker 17: has for too long been let

03:46:16 Speaker 17: off the hook, and I'm not

03:46:18 Speaker 17: prepared to support this. Thank you.

03:46:20 Speaker 17: Other comments? Any follow-up from staff

03:46:23 Speaker 17: with regards to that? No. Oh,

03:46:24 Speaker 07: sorry. Oh, we'll go to Councillor

03:46:25 Speaker 07: McLean then. Thank you, Madam Warden.

03:46:27 Speaker 07: And just to be brief, I

03:46:29 Speaker 07: know that this policy was developed.

03:46:30 Speaker 07: I think you said 2022. I

03:46:32 Speaker 07: know it talks about in the

03:46:34 Speaker 07: report that it must demonstrate that

03:46:36 Speaker 07: 20% of the house of those

03:46:37 Speaker 07: it serves must be great. Must

03:46:38 Speaker 07: be Gray County residents. I know

03:46:44 Speaker 07: there was a presentation from Southern

03:46:47 Speaker 07: Georgia Bay Hospital Group that is

03:46:49 Speaker 07: raising, you know, a million dollars

03:46:52 Speaker 07: for the Collingwood or the new

03:46:54 Speaker 07: Southern Georgia Bay Hospital. And I

03:46:58 Speaker 07: know that they got discouraged and

03:47:00 Speaker 07: they went away. But I think,

03:47:01 Speaker 07: in the sense, and this is

03:47:02 Speaker 07: just maybe for the next term

03:47:08 Speaker 07: of council, that maybe that policy

03:47:11 Speaker 07: needs to be reviewed because when

03:47:14 Speaker 07: it says twenty percent of its

03:47:16 Speaker 07: residents are to be served, that

03:47:18 Speaker 07: was I think I think originally

03:47:22 Speaker 07: went back to two thousand eighteen

03:47:24 Speaker 12: is when. Back 2018 is when

03:47:25 Speaker 12: that first came forward. When you

03:47:27 Speaker 12: talk about residents and you talk

03:47:29 Speaker 12: about the Blue Mountains and the

03:47:31 Speaker 12: Blue Mountain Resorts, I think if

03:47:33 Speaker 12: you're a guest for one night,

03:47:34 Speaker 12: you're a resident. Anyway, I'm not

03:47:36 Speaker 12: going to get into that tonight

03:47:41 Speaker 12: or today, but I think there

03:47:44 Speaker 12: needs to be a review of

03:47:52 Speaker 12: that policy, and I'll leave it

03:47:56 Speaker 12: at that. Okay. Any other comments,

03:48:01 Speaker 12: Councillor Eccles? Thank you. I agree.

03:48:02 Speaker 12: with some of the things that

03:48:05 Speaker 12: Councillor Deputy Warden Millen states. This

03:48:06 Speaker 42: isn't one of the ones I

03:48:08 Speaker 42: agree with him on. Yes, we

03:48:10 Speaker 42: do need these facilities. It's not

03:48:12 Speaker 42: quite healthcare, but it's the end-of-life

03:48:14 Speaker 42: care. Quickly, Sue. I don't know

03:48:17 Speaker 42: whether you have the information. What

03:48:20 Speaker 42: did we, as Gray County, put

03:48:22 Speaker 42: into Chapman House? We've already been

03:48:24 Speaker 42: down this road, and I believe

03:48:26 Speaker 42: that the county had money in.

03:48:29 Speaker 42: I can see Councillor Patterson nodding.

03:48:32 Speaker 42: That I believe we did put

03:48:34 Speaker 42: something in there. But the other

03:48:38 Speaker 42: factor is in healthcare; it goes

03:48:41 Speaker 42: well beyond hospice care. how many

03:48:43 Speaker 42: of the municipalities, how many property

03:48:46 Speaker 42: tax dollars have gone into the

03:48:47 Speaker 42: new building in Markdale? And I

03:48:50 Speaker 42: know that Southgate put in over

03:48:54 Speaker 42: three hundred thousand into that one.

03:49:00 Speaker 42: Yeah, I agree with you, but

03:49:04 Speaker 42: it's where we're at with the

03:49:06 Speaker 42: province on delivering healthcare—not just the

03:49:09 Speaker 42: bricks and mortar. It's the continuous

03:49:12 Speaker 42: maintenance and upgrades and. equipment that

03:49:18 Speaker 42: we continue to put into healthcare.

03:49:20 Speaker 42: I'm wondering if we were doing

03:49:22 Speaker 42: the same thing. I guess maybe

03:49:25 Speaker 42: we'd have to ask, you know,

03:49:27 Speaker 42: the property tax payers to add

03:49:32 Speaker 42: in and pay more, or if

03:49:34 Speaker 42: we could get the province to

03:49:38 Speaker 42: start putting more fuel into our

03:49:42 Speaker 42: graders to, or get a few

03:49:44 Speaker 42: more zambonis that somebody would purchase.

03:49:47 Speaker 42: so we can keep running our

03:49:53 Speaker 42: arenas. But that's a different topic.

03:49:56 Speaker 42: I I will be supporting this

03:49:58 Speaker 42: for the fact that it's an

03:50:01 Speaker 42: initiative. It is for five years,

03:50:05 Speaker 42: and it's done. And it is

03:50:07 Speaker 42: our commitment to the health of

03:50:09 Speaker 42: our communities, and to the welfare

03:50:11 Speaker 42: of the citizens of our communities.

03:50:13 Speaker 42: So I will be supporting the

03:50:15 Speaker 42: recommendations it states. Okay, thank you.

03:50:17 Speaker 42: Other comments, Councillor McQueen, and then

03:50:18 Speaker 42: Councillor Nielsen. Well, just following up

03:50:22 Speaker 42: on what the requirements are for

03:50:24 Speaker 42: healthcare. Just again, in the

03:50:26 Speaker 42: Southern Georgian Bay Hospital, they got

03:50:30 Speaker 42: to raise a hundred million for

03:50:32 Speaker 42: a billion-dollar hospital. So, but I

03:50:35 Speaker 42: do want to put a shout

03:50:37 Speaker 42: out for the Beaver Valley Ski

03:50:39 Speaker 42: Club. Just in June, they raised

03:50:42 Speaker 42: seventy-five thousand dollars for the for

03:50:43 Speaker 42: the Chapman House. So, a lot

03:50:45 Speaker 42: of funds are raised from local

03:50:47 Speaker 42: organisations that go back into those

03:50:49 Speaker 42: hospice. and I think that you

03:50:51 Speaker 42: know we all would agree that

03:50:53 Speaker 42: the end of life care is

03:50:54 Speaker 42: is so so important for sure.

03:50:56 Speaker 42: Councillor Nielsen, thank you very much.

03:51:01 Speaker 42: Word Master, often forgive me. I'm

03:51:05 Speaker 42: just trying to remember. The delegation

03:51:08 Speaker 42: and was the request from the

03:51:15 Speaker 42: hospice operational or capital funding? That

03:51:19 Speaker 42: I can I did confirm that

03:51:24 Speaker 42: the funds would go directly to

03:51:26 Speaker 43: the building of the of the

03:51:28 Speaker 43: hospice itself. Okay, and we'll look

03:51:30 Speaker 43: to the CAO. Just through Councillor

03:51:33 Speaker 43: Echo's question earlier, with respect to

03:51:35 Speaker 43: how much the county provided to

03:51:37 Speaker 43: the Chapman House, I did find

03:51:40 Speaker 43: some correspondence indicates that back in

03:51:44 Speaker 43: 2017 we provided a one-time capital

03:51:46 Speaker 43: grant of two hundred thousand dollars

03:51:48 Speaker 43: towards the construction, which again would

03:51:51 Speaker 43: be close to ten years ago

03:51:53 Speaker 43: in terms of towards that that

03:51:55 Speaker 43: particular project. So there could be

03:51:56 Speaker 43: more. funding that was provided, but

03:51:59 Speaker 43: that was definitely the amount that

03:52:01 Speaker 43: I could find in a short

03:52:05 Speaker 43: period of time. Thank you for

03:52:12 Speaker 43: that information. Okay, Councillor Gray. I

03:52:14 Speaker 43: would just like to state that

03:52:17 Speaker 43: I oppose the motion as is.

03:52:20 Speaker 43: There, because we have a. two

03:52:22 Speaker 43: hundred thousand dollar budget line item,

03:52:24 Speaker 43: does not mean it has to

03:52:26 Speaker 43: exist in continuity and that it's

03:52:28 Speaker 43: there to be drawn from. We

03:52:31 Speaker 43: have various investments and other healthcare

03:52:33 Speaker 43: initiatives, the Bayview Wellness, which is

03:52:35 Speaker 43: the two hundred thousand dollars, where

03:52:38 Speaker 43: you can easily demonstrate the impact

03:52:41 Speaker 43: in terms of reducing strain on

03:52:43 Speaker 43: some of the resources that the

03:52:46 Speaker 43: hospital may provide or that we

03:52:49 Speaker 43: provide through Kevin's team. In fact,

03:52:52 Speaker 43: just earlier, Kevin. spoke about hospital

03:52:53 Speaker 43: offloading. We have certain operational costs

03:52:55 Speaker 43: that we embed in our work

03:52:56 Speaker 43: here, which reduces strain in other

03:53:01 Speaker 43: in other systems that provide services

03:53:07 Speaker 43: for the public. But this is

03:53:10 Speaker 43: not one I can get behind.

03:53:13 Speaker 43: I firmly believe that the plaque

03:53:15 Speaker 43: on the wall is there

03:53:18 Speaker 12: to perhaps show Joe's excavating or.

03:53:19 Speaker 12: Murray's hauling whatever you know, a

03:53:21 Speaker 12: lawyer's office, a commercial interest that

03:53:24 Speaker 12: has something to gain with the

03:53:27 Speaker 12: exposure by investing and making that

03:53:29 Speaker 12: economic or that financial support. I'm

03:53:30 Speaker 12: totally on side with where we

03:53:33 Speaker 12: can and supported Chapman House, you

03:53:35 Speaker 12: know, and found where we can

03:53:38 Speaker 12: reduce soft services, soft costs. at

03:53:40 Speaker 12: the times of construction, waived DCs,

03:53:43 Speaker 12: certain municipal fees that can be

03:53:44 Speaker 12: waived, that are incremental, that are

03:53:47 Speaker 12: there, totally on, totally in support

03:53:49 Speaker 12: of supporting organisations such as this

03:53:52 Speaker 12: with initiatives like that. But in

03:53:54 Speaker 12: terms of just providing support financially,

03:53:56 Speaker 12: where the taxpayer can then see.

03:53:59 Speaker 12: that a on a level of

03:54:02 Speaker 12: government just donated their money is

03:54:04 Speaker 12: not something that I can get

03:54:06 Speaker 12: behind. I understand perhaps the the

03:54:08 Speaker 12: donation to Chapman House as well

03:54:11 Speaker 12: in the past, but again I

03:54:12 Speaker 12: referred to it earlier today. Times

03:54:15 Speaker 12: may be different if we're looking

03:54:17 Speaker 12: at five, six, seven percent increases

03:54:19 Speaker 12: in our tax lines. This is

03:54:21 Speaker 12: a tax line that should see

03:54:24 Speaker 12: scrutiny when it comes budget time

03:54:26 Speaker 12: and when that two. hundred thousand

03:54:31 Speaker 12: dollar donate donation commitment ends, then

03:54:35 Speaker 12: this is an opportunity where that

03:54:38 Speaker 12: two hundred thousand dollar line item

03:54:39 Speaker 13: should be evaluated by the

03:54:41 Speaker 13: council of the day. So, I

03:54:43 Speaker 13: I'm not in favour of us

03:54:47 Speaker 13: committing because it is a commitment.

03:54:51 Speaker 13: It's only going into the budget,

03:54:53 Speaker 13: but it is showing commitment again

03:54:55 Speaker 13: to maintaining that two hundred thousand

03:54:57 Speaker 13: dollar line item, which I think

03:55:00 Speaker 13: in this case should have future

03:55:01 Speaker 13: scrutiny by. council in terms of

03:55:04 Speaker 13: whether it stays or whether it

03:55:06 Speaker 13: goes out of the budget in

03:55:11 Speaker 13: future years. Okay, thank you. Any

03:55:14 Speaker 13: further comments? Not seeing any other

03:55:17 Speaker 13: hands. Oh, sorry, Councillor Kennedy. Thank

03:55:18 Speaker 13: you, Madam Warden. I just think

03:55:29 Speaker 13: that we, the Deputy Warden's. comments

03:55:30 Speaker 13: are certainly apropos, but I think

03:55:35 Speaker 03: that it's time that we get

03:55:42 Speaker 03: behind the movement to try and

03:55:48 Speaker 03: fix the problem with the province,

03:55:56 Speaker 03: and and that this should be

03:56:00 Speaker 03: the beginning of a of a

03:56:04 Speaker 03: move to try and change things,

03:56:05 Speaker 03: and to and it's going to

03:56:14 Speaker 15: take some work for municipalities to

03:56:17 Speaker 15: and maybe when you're at the

03:56:20 Speaker 03: AMO in the next little while.

03:56:22 Speaker 03: you'll have some discussions with the

03:56:24 Speaker 02: other municipal representatives around the province

03:56:27 Speaker 02: and see if we can't, you

03:56:28 Speaker 02: know, move the needle with the

03:56:31 Speaker 02: province on healthcare, which the whole

03:56:32 Speaker 02: system is pretty close to broke.

03:56:33 Speaker 02: I think it's awfully difficult to,

03:56:34 Speaker 02: having supported hospitals and hospices to

03:56:37 Speaker 02: the degree that Grey County has

03:56:38 Speaker 02: for many, many years, I think

03:56:40 Speaker 02: just. I I think just a

03:56:42 Speaker 02: an open break and say so

03:56:44 Speaker 02: sad but we're done is just

03:56:48 Speaker 02: not the way to to move

03:56:51 Speaker 02: on it and I think that

03:56:54 Speaker 02: there are better ways and they

03:56:56 Speaker 02: will be take time and work

03:56:57 Speaker 02: but that's what needs to be

03:57:00 Speaker 02: done and that we you know

03:57:01 Speaker 02: I think council should examine every

03:57:03 Speaker 02: year what has contributed to some

03:57:04 Speaker 02: of these causes but there's a

03:57:06 Speaker 02: long established tradition of Gray County

03:57:08 Speaker 02: standing behind the most important needs

03:57:11 Speaker 02: of our communities, and that, and

03:57:12 Speaker 02: we know there's a great need

03:57:13 Speaker 02: for this new hospice, and that

03:57:16 Speaker 42: we should continue to support it.

03:57:18 Speaker 42: Thank you. Thank you. Any other

03:57:19 Speaker 42: comments, CAO? Just further to through

03:57:21 Speaker 42: your warden, through to Councillor Greg's

03:57:23 Speaker 42: comments with respect to in terms

03:57:25 Speaker 42: of the. incoming council's consideration, future

03:57:28 Speaker 42: budget considerations, the way the motion

03:57:30 Speaker 42: is currently worded is that staff

03:57:33 Speaker 42: be directed to include this request

03:57:36 Speaker 42: of 175,000 included for consideration in

03:57:40 Speaker 42: those respective budgets of 35,000 per

03:57:42 Speaker 42: year to be funded from the

03:57:46 Speaker 42: healthcare funding reserve. So there would

03:57:50 Speaker 42: be consideration, even if this motion

03:57:53 Speaker 42: were to be approved, there would

03:57:55 Speaker 42: be consideration for that to be,

03:57:58 Speaker 42: I guess, reconsidered or discussed further

03:58:00 Speaker 42: with respect to. when we go

03:58:02 Speaker 42: through the the budget process, as

03:58:06 Speaker 42: part of that, is as least

03:58:12 Speaker 42: my take in terms of the

03:58:14 Speaker 42: wording. And so, but as per

03:58:15 Speaker 42: the current policy, we received a

03:58:17 Speaker 39: request before the June 30th deadline.

03:58:17 Speaker 39: As as as interim director Murray

03:58:19 Speaker 39: noted, it meets the policy requirements

03:58:22 Speaker 39: as set out by the policy

03:58:24 Speaker 39: that was approved by council. I

03:58:25 Speaker 39: think interim director Murray's come up

03:58:27 Speaker 39: with a you know identified. Here's

03:58:29 Speaker 39: where we're at with the with

03:58:31 Speaker 39: the current reserve amount, and here's

03:58:36 Speaker 39: how it could be funded. But

03:58:39 Speaker 39: recognizing that that could still be

03:58:41 Speaker 39: up for consideration as as part

03:58:43 Speaker 39: of the overall budget discussions is

03:58:44 Speaker 39: is my current take of of

03:58:46 Speaker 39: the wording of the motion. Okay,

03:58:49 Speaker 39: thank you, Councillor Dobrin. Thank you,

03:58:53 Speaker 39: and through you, twofold. If you

03:58:54 Speaker 39: were asking us to commit one

03:58:56 Speaker 39: hundred seventy five thousand. Commit one

03:59:01 Speaker 39: hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars one-time

03:59:02 Speaker 39: payment. I would have issue. I

03:59:04 Speaker 39: would have concern. We have committed

03:59:06 Speaker 39: other areas two hundred thousand dollars

03:59:08 Speaker 39: in its entirety, and this is

03:59:10 Speaker 39: over a five-year period. But this

03:59:11 Speaker 39: is still to be decided by

03:59:13 Speaker 39: the incoming council as to what's

03:59:14 Speaker 39: in, what's out. Are we continuing?

03:59:18 Speaker 39: Are we not continuing? So this

03:59:19 Speaker 39: is a more of a recommendation

03:59:22 Speaker 39: to. the new council as to

03:59:23 Speaker 39: what to consider. Could you just

03:59:24 Speaker 39: refresh my memory? The Sogin Hospice

03:59:26 Speaker 39: was going to be located in

03:59:29 Speaker 39: Walkerton. Through you, Warren. Yes, that's

03:59:31 Speaker 39: that's our understanding. Is that it's

03:59:32 Speaker 39: to be built in in in

03:59:34 Speaker 39: Walkerton in the northeast corner of

03:59:35 Speaker 39: Walkerton. so therefore not located in

03:59:37 Speaker 39: Gray County and northeast. Okay, thank

03:59:39 Speaker 39: you. I answered my question. Thank

03:59:41 Speaker 39: you. Okay, any other comments? Okay,

03:59:44 Speaker 39: then I will call the question.

03:59:45 Speaker 39: All those in favour. All the

03:59:46 Speaker 39: question. All those in favour? Okay,

03:59:48 Speaker 39: that motion is carried. Thank you.

03:59:51 Speaker 39: Okay, thank you very much, Treasurer

03:59:52 Speaker 39: Murray. And at this point in

03:59:54 Speaker 39: time, before we go to seven

03:59:57 Speaker 39: H, because it is tied to

03:59:59 Speaker 39: the closed session material, we will

04:00:02 Speaker 39: now return to items six C

04:00:04 Speaker 39: and F, unless there's any objection

04:00:05 Speaker 39: to that. But it would make

04:00:07 Speaker 39: more sense for the flow of

04:00:09 Speaker 39: what we. have to do this

04:00:10 Speaker 39: afternoon. Okay, seeing no objections, we

04:00:11 Speaker 39: will then go to item six

04:00:13 Speaker 39: C, the first item which was

04:00:17 Speaker 39: pulled. Oh, so I guess get

04:00:18 Speaker 39: ready, come on back, Madam Treasurer.

04:00:19 Speaker 39: It's recommended that report FRCW eighteen

04:00:21 Speaker 39: twenty six regarding the quarterly purchasing

04:00:23 Speaker 39: report for quarter two of twenty

04:00:24 Speaker 39: twenty six be received for information.

04:00:25 Speaker 39: May ask for a mover and

04:00:27 Speaker 39: a seconder. I got it moved

04:00:32 Speaker 39: by Councillor Keaveny, seconded by Councillor

04:00:33 Speaker 39: Gregg. It's on. By Councillor Gregg.

04:00:36 Speaker 39: So on the floor for discussion,

04:00:37 Speaker 39: Councillor Gregg, you had asked to

04:00:40 Speaker 39: pull this to share a question.

04:00:41 Speaker 39: Please go ahead. I do, which

04:00:43 Speaker 39: might be better than having to

04:00:46 Speaker 39: go through all the line items

04:00:49 Speaker 39: in the quarterly purchasing purchasing report,

04:00:51 Speaker 39: which I thank you for presenting

04:00:53 Speaker 12: or preparing for us. My question,

04:00:55 Speaker 12: when I was reading it, there

04:00:58 Speaker 12: was a line item. It was

04:00:59 Speaker 12: seven one three Ninth Avenue East,

04:01:03 Speaker 12: and it was a roofing project.

04:01:06 Speaker 12: And in to my memory, I

04:01:09 Speaker 12: had no recollection of this ever

04:01:11 Speaker 12: being. in exposed during budget to

04:01:14 Speaker 12: council, and in reaching out to

04:01:15 Speaker 12: staff, well, perhaps I'll let you

04:01:18 Speaker 12: present as to why that is.

04:01:19 Speaker 12: I think I wonder about strengthening

04:01:22 Speaker 12: our policy in the future so

04:01:23 Speaker 12: that an expenditure that size, that's

04:01:27 Speaker 12: not on an existing capital plan,

04:01:30 Speaker 12: is something that council is made

04:01:32 Speaker 12: aware of. Councils made aware of

04:01:34 Speaker 12: before it just appears on a

04:01:38 Speaker 12: quarterly report. Yes, thank you for

04:01:41 Speaker 12: that question. This project, which Harrison

04:01:45 Speaker 12: has is you directed the question

04:01:48 Speaker 12: to him. He answered it, so

04:01:50 Speaker 12: I'm going to try to. He

04:01:53 Speaker 12: probably has more of the devil

04:01:55 Speaker 12: in the details, but I I

04:01:57 Speaker 12: truly feel reflecting upon it. Yep,

04:01:58 Speaker 12: I as we as finance did

04:02:01 Speaker 12: not do. Maybe the steps we

04:02:04 Speaker 12: probably should have done in the

04:02:05 Speaker 12: correct order. I think it was.

04:02:07 Speaker 12: some of it was some timing

04:02:10 Speaker 12: issues around grants being approved and

04:02:13 Speaker 12: not hitting reports the way we

04:02:14 Speaker 12: should have. So going forward, definitely

04:02:17 Speaker 12: this should have been brought a

04:02:18 Speaker 12: report to council should have been

04:02:20 Speaker 12: brought to you your attention on

04:02:23 Speaker 12: this capital project. There was in

04:02:26 Speaker 12: twenty twenty four twenty five was

04:02:28 Speaker 12: there was some co chief funds

04:02:30 Speaker 12: there was an investment plan presented.

04:02:34 Speaker 12: It was in. in there, and

04:02:38 Speaker 12: then in I think in the

04:02:41 Speaker 12: fall of twenty twenty five there

04:02:42 Speaker 12: was a tender for that project

04:02:44 Speaker 12: build, and the and then the

04:02:45 Speaker 12: staff decided that they re tendered.

04:02:49 Speaker 15: There was two bids, and then

04:02:52 Speaker 15: they re tendered it back, and

04:02:54 Speaker 15: unfortunately we missed picking it back

04:02:56 Speaker 15: up into that next budget cycle.

04:02:59 Speaker 15: So there were some missed pieces

04:03:02 Speaker 15: along the way, and I own

04:03:05 Speaker 15: those as finance. So, but I

04:03:07 Speaker 15: what could I can tell to

04:03:09 Speaker 15: you going forward is that we

04:03:11 Speaker 15: will. do better. Going forward, we

04:03:13 Speaker 15: should have realized in when we

04:03:15 Speaker 15: did our capital project report earlier

04:03:18 Speaker 15: to you that we should have

04:03:20 Speaker 15: included it in there. But I

04:03:23 Speaker 15: think that too was also a

04:03:26 Speaker 15: timing difference because there were no

04:03:28 Speaker 15: expenditures. We didn't have a capital

04:03:31 Speaker 15: project identified to that project in

04:03:34 Speaker 15: our budget. hadn't spent it, and

04:03:37 Speaker 15: it was right around the time

04:03:41 Speaker 15: we were doing the report, and

04:03:44 Speaker 15: it wasn't quite. It was purely

04:03:50 Speaker 15: a timing issue. Going forward, I

04:03:51 Speaker 15: did speak with our purchasing manager

04:03:52 Speaker 15: this morning. Going forward, we will

04:03:55 Speaker 15: ensure that when we are doing

04:03:58 Speaker 15: capital projects, we will also identify

04:03:59 Speaker 15: a capital project number so that

04:04:01 Speaker 15: we can identify it back into

04:04:03 Speaker 15: our budget book, and/or we also

04:04:05 Speaker 15: will, for our internal purposes, need

04:04:07 Speaker 15: to know because there will be

04:04:09 Speaker 15: capital expenditures that we need to

04:04:10 Speaker 15: apply to a capital project going

04:04:11 Speaker 15: forward for our reporting purposes. That's

04:04:13 Speaker 07: the the nice thing about our

04:04:16 Speaker 07: new budgeting software is it allows

04:04:17 Speaker 07: us to do that because there

04:04:20 Speaker 07: are projects sometimes where we do

04:04:23 Speaker 07: budget. Times where we do budget

04:04:25 Speaker 07: for stuff that doesn't actually have

04:04:27 Speaker 07: a capital project, and then we

04:04:29 Speaker 07: have to sort of create one

04:04:32 Speaker 07: behind the scenes because there's a

04:04:33 Speaker 07: future report. So, okay, thank you.

04:04:35 Speaker 07: We're also going to go to

04:04:37 Speaker 07: the CAO. Through you, Warden, and

04:04:39 Speaker 07: just further to interim director Murray's

04:04:41 Speaker 07: comments with respect to this, just

04:04:43 Speaker 07: to provide some context with respect

04:04:44 Speaker 07: to this project and how that

04:04:46 Speaker 07: project was funded. So, as as

04:04:48 Speaker 07: interim director indicated that this this

04:04:49 Speaker 07: project was. not listed as a

04:04:51 Speaker 07: project, a specific project in the

04:04:52 Speaker 07: capital budget. It's funded entirely from

04:04:55 Speaker 07: our our Cochi grant. So these

04:04:57 Speaker 07: are provincial funds that we receive

04:04:59 Speaker 07: on an annual basis, and and

04:05:00 Speaker 07: through that, what what has been

04:05:02 Speaker 07: the historical practice is that we

04:05:04 Speaker 07: develop what's the housing department develops

04:05:06 Speaker 07: an investment plan, and that goes

04:05:07 Speaker 07: through in this case the community

04:05:09 Speaker 07: services committee to identify where we

04:05:10 Speaker 07: might be able to. look at

04:05:11 Speaker 07: some projects for allocations. There is

04:05:13 Speaker 07: funds that are set aside and

04:05:14 Speaker 07: allocated for unidentified capital projects. For

04:05:16 Speaker 07: five hundred thousand dollars, that's that

04:05:18 Speaker 07: was allocated with respect to that.

04:05:19 Speaker 07: That was initially earmarked for the

04:05:20 Speaker 07: Dundalk build project, and as as

04:05:25 Speaker 07: we you've heard through updates, that

04:05:30 Speaker 07: project has been delayed, and this

04:05:32 Speaker 07: this particular project popped up in

04:05:32 Speaker 07: terms of. needing to be done,

04:05:35 Speaker 07: and so in order to utilise

04:05:37 Speaker 07: and maximize the use of those

04:05:39 Speaker 15: funds, it was determined by staff

04:05:46 Speaker 15: at that that time to be

04:05:49 Speaker 15: able to proceed with that piece.

04:05:52 Speaker 15: As interim director Murray's indicated, I

04:05:54 Speaker 15: think there's is an opportunity to

04:05:56 Speaker 15: look at what that process looks

04:05:58 Speaker 15: like going forward, so that councils

04:06:01 Speaker 15: not seeing that project at this

04:06:05 Speaker 15: stage in terms of once it's

04:06:07 Speaker 15: already been tendered and and completed.

04:06:11 Speaker 15: And complete it, and so we're

04:06:13 Speaker 15: looking to see what how we

04:06:16 Speaker 15: can improve those processes on a

04:06:19 Speaker 15: go forward basis. So appreciate Councillor

04:06:23 Speaker 15: Greg raising raising that question, and

04:06:24 Speaker 15: we can we'll explore what those

04:06:25 Speaker 15: those process improvements look like on

04:06:26 Speaker 15: a go forward basis. Okay, thank

04:06:29 Speaker 15: you, and don't see any further

04:06:31 Speaker 15: questions on this matter. So I'll

04:06:33 Speaker 15: I will call the question. All

04:06:34 Speaker 15: those in favour, and that motion

04:06:36 Speaker 15: is carried. Thank you. Next, we'll

04:06:37 Speaker 15: tidy up with Section Six at

04:06:38 Speaker 15: F. It's recommended that Report TRCW

04:06:41 Speaker 15: twenty nine twenty six be received,

04:06:42 Speaker 15: and that a bylaw be brought

04:06:46 Speaker 15: forward for council's consideration to amend

04:06:52 Speaker 15: Schedule A of Bylaw forty nine

04:06:54 Speaker 15: forty five sixteen, being a being

04:06:56 Speaker 15: the bylaw to permit off road

04:06:57 Speaker 15: vehicles on certain roadways under the

04:07:00 Speaker 15: jurisdiction of the County of Grey

04:07:02 Speaker 15: by mending portions of Grey. Mending

04:07:03 Speaker 44: portions of Gray Road 10 and

04:07:05 Speaker 44: Gray Road 28 where off-road vehicles

04:07:07 Speaker 44: are not permitted. Specifically, Gray Road

04:07:09 Speaker 44: 10 from the south limit of

04:07:11 Speaker 44: Gray County to Natville Road, and

04:07:12 Speaker 44: Gray County Road 10 from Seventh

04:07:14 Speaker 44: Avenue in Hanover to the northern

04:07:17 Speaker 44: limit of Gray County, and Gray

04:07:19 Speaker 44: County Road 28 from the intersection

04:07:22 Speaker 44: of Concession Concession 2 NDR and

04:07:24 Speaker 44: Fifth Side Road NDR. to Bruce

04:07:27 Speaker 44: to Bruce Road, ten Seventh Avenue,

04:07:30 Speaker 44: Hanover. Okay, so may I ask

04:07:33 Speaker 44: for a mover and a seconder?

04:07:34 Speaker 44: Okay, we've got it moved by

04:07:37 Speaker 44: Councillor McQueen, seconded, seconded by Councillor

04:07:40 Speaker 44: Pringle. So it's on the floor.

04:07:42 Speaker 44: I'm going to go to Councillor

04:07:44 Speaker 44: McQueen first, and then Director Hoy

04:07:46 Speaker 44: will stand in for staff response.

04:07:48 Speaker 44: So Councillor McQueen, you would pull

04:07:50 Speaker 44: this. Okay, thank you, Madam Warden,

04:07:52 Speaker 44: and I have no issue with

04:07:54 Speaker 44: the with the resolution. that's in

04:07:57 Speaker 44: front of us. I guess the

04:08:01 Speaker 44: bigger question is in today's day,

04:08:03 Speaker 44: and I know this has been

04:08:04 Speaker 44: a download from the province, fifteen

04:08:06 Speaker 44: twenty years ago about who is

04:08:09 Speaker 44: the jurisdiction over side by side

04:08:12 Speaker 44: ATVs and all that stuff, off

04:08:16 Speaker 44: road vehicles on our municipal roads.

04:08:18 Speaker 44: I know from Grey Highlands we

04:08:21 Speaker 44: we have a bylaw that it

04:08:21 Speaker 44: just it just lists the exemptions,

04:08:23 Speaker 44: not the roads that are allowed.

04:08:28 Speaker 44: I wonder if at some point

04:08:29 Speaker 44: in the new new setting of

04:08:31 Speaker 44: this horseshoe is this is to

04:08:33 Speaker 44: be reviewed because in today's day,

04:08:35 Speaker 44: I bet you a lot of

04:08:38 Speaker 44: people going down our roads roads

04:08:40 Speaker 44: in Gray County don't have a

04:08:43 Speaker 44: clue that they're not supposed to

04:08:45 Speaker 44: be on county roads. And you

04:08:49 Speaker 44: know the sales of side by

04:08:52 Speaker 44: sides and and is continuing to

04:08:54 Speaker 44: grow and grow and grow and

04:08:58 Speaker 44: and you know people are almost

04:08:59 Speaker 44: using it as a means of

04:09:02 Speaker 44: transportation. So I think at some

04:09:05 Speaker 44: point the bylaws should be reviewed

04:09:07 Speaker 44: and its and its entirety and

04:09:08 Speaker 44: and just see if there is.

04:09:10 Speaker 44: maybe the other side of strict,

04:09:13 Speaker 44: you know, maybe looking at restricting

04:09:15 Speaker 44: the ones where you don't want

04:09:18 Speaker 44: them versus having it across. Not

04:09:20 Speaker 44: opening up the conversation today. I

04:09:22 Speaker 44: just, I think from today's day,

04:09:25 Speaker 44: probably most people using our roads

04:09:27 Speaker 44: have no clue, no clue that

04:09:29 Speaker 44: they're not supposed to be going

04:09:33 Speaker 44: down most county roads. Okay. Thank

04:09:35 Speaker 44: you. Any other comments? Okay. All

04:09:37 Speaker 44: right then. Looks like we're ready

04:09:40 Speaker 44: to call the vote. All those

04:09:43 Speaker 44: in favour? And that motion

04:09:46 Speaker 44: is carried. Thank you. Okay, that

04:09:48 Speaker 44: allows us to go then to

04:09:51 Speaker 44: item seven. Seven H. And we

04:09:53 Speaker 44: have our County Solicitor on standby.

04:09:55 Speaker 44: It's recommended that report LSR CW

04:09:59 Speaker 44: zero one twenty six regarding the

04:10:01 Speaker 44: updated land acquisition and disposition policy

04:10:03 Speaker 44: be received, and that the updated

04:10:05 Speaker 44: land acquisition and disposition policy be

04:10:06 Speaker 44: approved as presented, and that G.

04:10:09 Speaker 44: Gen zero zero three sale and

04:10:12 Speaker 44: acquisition land policy of land policy

04:10:13 Speaker 44: and G Gen zero zero three

04:10:15 Speaker 44: zero zero one sale of

04:10:18 Speaker 44: land procedure and G Gen zero

04:10:19 Speaker 44: zero three zero zero two

04:10:22 Speaker 44: acquisition of land procedure be rescinded.

04:10:23 Speaker 44: Okay, so what we'll do is

04:10:26 Speaker 44: I'm going to call for a

04:10:29 Speaker 44: mover and a seconder to get

04:10:30 Speaker 44: this on the floor for any

04:10:33 Speaker 44: open introduction, and then as I

04:10:35 Speaker 44: mentioned, we will then proceed into

04:10:36 Speaker 44: close. We will then proceed into

04:10:37 Speaker 44: closed session before we vote on

04:10:40 Speaker 44: the open session matter. So, with

04:10:41 Speaker 44: that, may I ask for a

04:10:45 Speaker 44: move and a second? Moved by

04:10:48 Speaker 44: Councillor Nielsen, seconded by the Deputy

04:10:49 Speaker 44: Warden. It's now on the floor

04:10:52 Speaker 44: for open discussion. And welcome, County

04:10:54 Speaker 44: Solicitor Morrison. Right. Good afternoon, and

04:10:57 Speaker 44: thank you, Madam Warden, County Council.

04:11:00 Speaker 44: So, the purpose of this report

04:11:02 Speaker 44: is to present Council with an

04:11:04 Speaker 44: updated land acquisition and disposition policy

04:11:07 Speaker 44: for consideration. and I would like

04:11:09 Speaker 44: to start off by thanking Lacey

04:11:11 Speaker 44: Thompson, our law clerk and real

04:11:12 Speaker 44: estate coordinator. She is here with

04:11:13 Speaker 44: us today to help ask any

04:11:17 Speaker 44: questions, but her hard work and

04:11:20 Speaker 44: dedication is why this is in

04:11:22 Speaker 44: front of us today. So the

04:11:24 Speaker 44: Municipal Act requires that municipalities adopt

04:11:27 Speaker 44: and maintain a policy with respect

04:11:30 Speaker 44: to the sale and disposition of

04:11:33 Speaker 44: land. Our current sale and acquisition

04:11:35 Speaker 44: of land policy and the two

04:11:38 Speaker 44: related procedures are from twenty twelve.

04:11:41 Speaker 44: 2012. They were amended in 2014,

04:11:42 Speaker 44: and staff have reviewed the current

04:11:46 Speaker 44: policy and procedures and are recommending

04:11:48 Speaker 44: an updated policy for council's consideration.

04:11:49 Speaker 44: There have been significant changes that

04:11:50 Speaker 44: have been made, but generally the

04:11:53 Speaker 44: process will remain the same. There

04:11:56 Speaker 44: are some key exceptions that we'll

04:11:57 Speaker 44: go over, but the policy is

04:12:01 Speaker 44: intended to ensure that the land

04:12:03 Speaker 44: transaction process is fair, open, and

04:12:06 Speaker 44: transparent while protecting the county's interests.

04:12:07 Speaker 44: So I will do. a high-level

04:12:09 Speaker 44: overview of the proposed changes, but

04:12:12 Speaker 44: happy to answer any questions on

04:12:15 Speaker 44: specific changes if you have them.

04:12:18 Speaker 44: So there was a fairly significant

04:12:19 Speaker 44: overall administrative update, which transitions the

04:12:22 Speaker 44: policy to the county's current policy

04:12:25 Speaker 44: template. So this consolidates the three

04:12:26 Speaker 44: documents into one policy

04:12:29 Speaker 44: document. The intent of this

04:12:31 Speaker 44: change is just to bring it

04:12:33 Speaker 44: up to our current policy template.

04:12:36 Speaker 44: The policy statement. the purpose, and

04:12:39 Speaker 44: the scope have all been updated,

04:12:41 Speaker 44: but the intent remains the same.

04:12:45 Speaker 44: We have added a table of

04:12:47 Speaker 44: contents for ease of reference. Section

04:12:49 Speaker 44: one, definitions and interpretation, have been

04:12:50 Speaker 44: updated to reflect the new policy.

04:12:53 Speaker 44: We have a new legislated requirements

04:12:55 Speaker 44: section, which is in accordance with

04:13:01 Speaker 44: the policy template. We have an

04:13:02 Speaker 44: updated exception section. This is to

04:13:04 Speaker 44: add clarity. We have a new.

04:13:05 Speaker 44: financial matters section. This is to

04:13:08 Speaker 15: bring us in line again with

04:13:10 Speaker 15: that new current accounting policy template.

04:13:12 Speaker 15: We have an updated value for

04:13:14 Speaker 15: land section, and there is a

04:13:17 Speaker 15: key change to highlight in this

04:13:20 Speaker 15: section, which is the addition of

04:13:22 Speaker 15: the staff value estimate method for

04:13:23 Speaker 07: land that is under seventy-five thousand.

04:13:25 Speaker 07: I will note that this does

04:13:27 Speaker 07: not permit staff proceed without council

04:13:28 Speaker 07: approval unless an exemption is found

04:13:29 Speaker 07: elsewhere in the policy. Both where

04:13:31 Speaker 07: in the policy, Section Six, valuation

04:13:33 Speaker 07: not required, has been updated, but

04:13:35 Speaker 07: the intent remains the same. We

04:13:37 Speaker 07: have an updated procedure for acquisition

04:13:39 Speaker 07: of land section. The intent remains

04:13:41 Speaker 07: the same, but we have expanded

04:13:43 Speaker 07: this for clarity. We have a

04:13:46 Speaker 07: new methods of acquisition section. The

04:13:49 Speaker 07: previous procedure combined procedure and methods

04:13:51 Speaker 07: into one section and contained additional

04:13:52 Speaker 07: sections for some specific methods. but

04:13:54 Speaker 07: we expanded it into its own

04:13:55 Speaker 07: new section and added additional methods

04:13:56 Speaker 07: for clarity. Section nine we have

04:13:57 Speaker 07: updated for the procedure of disposition.

04:13:58 Speaker 07: Again, same with the acquisition; the

04:14:00 Speaker 07: intent remains the same, but we

04:14:02 Speaker 07: have expanded it for clarity. We

04:14:03 Speaker 07: have an updated notice section under

04:14:04 Speaker 07: section ten. There is a key

04:14:05 Speaker 07: change to note in this section,

04:14:07 Speaker 07: where we have removed the requirement

04:14:12 Speaker 07: for newspaper publication as part of

04:14:13 Speaker 07: the notice requirements. The general circulation

04:14:15 Speaker 07: of newspapers has decreased, and finding

04:14:17 Speaker 44: a newspaper in the relevant geographic

04:14:19 Speaker 44: areas has become increasingly challenging. The

04:14:21 Speaker 44: cost for advertising has also increased,

04:14:23 Speaker 44: so we still would have notice.

04:14:24 Speaker 44: And depending on the method of

04:14:25 Speaker 44: sale, there may be additional notice.

04:14:27 Speaker 44: So we did give the example

04:14:30 Speaker 44: of real estates and their advertising

04:14:31 Speaker 44: and MLS postings and that kind

04:14:34 Speaker 44: of thing. We have an updated

04:14:36 Speaker 44: Section 11 for methods of disposition.

04:14:39 Speaker 44: The intent was to expand and.

04:14:41 Speaker 44: clarify the various methods here, and

04:14:43 Speaker 44: we have given it the example

04:14:45 Speaker 44: of depending on the method, there

04:14:46 Speaker 44: may be exemptions. So auctions, public

04:14:49 Speaker 44: tenders under five hundred thousand, and

04:14:50 Speaker 44: requests for proposals all have exemptions

04:14:52 Speaker 44: in them. But also noting that

04:14:54 Speaker 44: council approval would be required, so

04:14:55 Speaker 44: we'd come to council, ask for

04:14:58 Speaker 44: approval to go by one of

04:15:01 Speaker 44: those methods, and that's when the

04:15:03 Speaker 44: exemptions would kick in. So section

04:15:05 Speaker 44: twelve, we. have a new special

04:15:07 Speaker 44: acquisition and dispositions category. This was

04:15:11 Speaker 44: to highlight some special categories that

04:15:13 Speaker 44: didn't cleanly fit in the other

04:15:15 Speaker 44: headings. And then we have a

04:15:17 Speaker 44: new delegation of authority section, which

04:15:18 Speaker 44: the previous land acquisition procedure had

04:15:20 Speaker 44: a delegated authority section, whereas the

04:15:21 Speaker 44: sale procedure was largely silent. So,

04:15:24 Speaker 07: this is to add some clarity

04:15:25 Speaker 07: for both the sale and acquisition.

04:15:26 Speaker 07: And we have. an updated schedule

04:15:27 Speaker 07: A. There is a key change

04:15:29 Speaker 07: to note here, which is that

04:15:30 Speaker 07: we are proposing to increase the

04:15:34 Speaker 07: compensation amounts in the acquisition for

04:15:37 Speaker 07: road purposes to better reflect the

04:15:41 Speaker 07: current market conditions. So, as you

04:15:44 Speaker 07: can imagine, land values have increased

04:15:48 Speaker 07: significantly since 2012. Staff has found

04:15:50 Speaker 07: that the values in the current

04:15:53 Speaker 07: policy make it difficult to reach

04:15:55 Speaker 07: negotiated agreements without obtaining an appraisal

04:15:56 Speaker 07: or seeking additional direction from council,

04:15:58 Speaker 07: which. costs additional resources and causes

04:16:03 Speaker 17: delays. The updated schedule also includes

04:16:05 Speaker 17: the new method for staff valuations

04:16:06 Speaker 17: for land under seventy-five thousand. The

04:16:08 Speaker 17: intent is to support our colleagues

04:16:13 Speaker 17: in transportation services in negotiating agreements

04:16:15 Speaker 17: with landowners for acquisitions required for

04:16:17 Speaker 17: road purposes. The ability to secure

04:16:18 Speaker 44: property efficiently can significantly affect project

04:16:20 Speaker 44: timing, and so these additions are

04:16:23 Speaker 44: intended to support successful, efficient, and

04:16:25 Speaker 44: effective. negotiations, and and then so

04:16:31 Speaker 44: as Madam Ward noted, we do

04:16:33 Speaker 44: have a closed session component here,

04:16:35 Speaker 45: and where we have a new

04:16:38 Speaker 45: property negotiation guide, but we propose

04:16:42 Speaker 45: to discuss that in close to

04:16:45 Speaker 45: protect our negotiation power. Okay, thank

04:16:47 Speaker 45: you for that introduction to open.

04:16:49 Speaker 45: So just before we go into

04:16:51 Speaker 45: close to be able to discuss

04:16:53 Speaker 45: the the final pieces of this

04:16:56 Speaker 45: consideration prior to voting on this

04:16:59 Speaker 45: in open. On this and open,

04:17:01 Speaker 45: if you have an open session

04:17:03 Speaker 45: question, please go ahead, Councillor McLean.

04:17:04 Speaker 45: Thank you, Madam Warden, and I

04:17:08 Speaker 45: know that I remember

04:17:10 Speaker 45: I remember the 2012 report, and

04:17:11 Speaker 44: I remember there was two different

04:17:13 Speaker 44: values for acre per land or

04:17:14 Speaker 44: whatever. One was for the Blue

04:17:16 Speaker 44: Mountains, and then it was the

04:17:17 Speaker 44: rest of the municipality or the

04:17:21 Speaker 44: county. Now we've seen a lot

04:17:23 Speaker 44: of values change. One is farmland,

04:17:24 Speaker 44: like at most places, thirty thousand

04:17:25 Speaker 44: acre farmland or farmland back in

04:17:27 Speaker 44: 2012 was probably less than ten

04:17:30 Speaker 44: or or more. so that has

04:17:32 Speaker 44: changed something. And I don't know,

04:17:33 Speaker 44: getting into details if you have.

04:17:35 Speaker 44: So you you still use an

04:17:36 Speaker 44: appraiser. Because the land value of

04:17:37 Speaker 44: the county is probably different than

04:17:39 Speaker 44: 2012, and it's probably all over

04:17:44 Speaker 44: the place. So I know you

04:17:48 Speaker 44: try to come, and I know

04:17:50 Speaker 44: a lot of times it's the

04:17:53 Speaker 44: appraiser that tries to get you

04:17:56 Speaker 42: that value. But I know it's,

04:17:58 Speaker 42: and sometimes if it's a small

04:18:01 Speaker 42: piece, you take whatever it is

04:18:02 Speaker 42: per acre divided by square footage,

04:18:05 Speaker 42: and you try to come up

04:18:07 Speaker 42: with that number. Not if you

04:18:12 Speaker 42: have anything to add to that.

04:18:13 Speaker 42: Oops, sorry. Thank you for the

04:18:15 Speaker 42: question. So I I agree with

04:18:17 Speaker 42: you that it is difficult to

04:18:21 Speaker 42: narrow down a specific base price

04:18:23 Speaker 42: that applies across the county. We

04:18:26 Speaker 42: did try to do that, and

04:18:29 Speaker 42: that's part of the reason it

04:18:31 Speaker 42: took so long to get this

04:18:34 Speaker 42: report back is that we couldn't.

04:18:37 Speaker 42: So with Schedule A, it's for

04:18:42 Speaker 42: those smaller pieces for row purposes

04:18:43 Speaker 42: where we have set a compensation

04:18:46 Speaker 44: rate in there, but that's why

04:18:47 Speaker 44: we have also added the staff.

04:18:50 Speaker 44: valuation method because we recognize, like

04:18:53 Speaker 44: our friends in Blue Mountains, their

04:18:55 Speaker 44: land values may differ. So the

04:18:57 Speaker 44: the base compensation rate that's included

04:18:59 Speaker 44: in Schedule A may not always

04:19:01 Speaker 44: be appropriate. So by adding that

04:19:03 Speaker 44: staff valuation method, it gives transportation

04:19:04 Speaker 44: a bit more freedom to be

04:19:09 Speaker 44: able to negotiate up to that

04:19:14 Speaker 44: seventy five thousand. But of course,

04:19:16 Speaker 44: if if we don't have the

04:19:18 Speaker 15: comparators, or if we decide that

04:19:19 Speaker 15: it's over the seventy five, then

04:19:21 Speaker 15: we would be looking at. getting

04:19:23 Speaker 15: appraisers or looking at different valuation

04:19:24 Speaker 15: methods. Just an example, you could

04:19:26 Speaker 15: be road widening a section of

04:19:28 Speaker 15: of a county road that hasn't

04:19:29 Speaker 15: had the road widening, and you'd

04:19:31 Speaker 15: be going along all those farms.

04:19:34 Speaker 15: And if they're valued at thirty

04:19:35 Speaker 15: thousand an acre, you may have

04:19:36 Speaker 15: the it may be much different

04:19:39 Speaker 15: today than it would have been

04:19:41 Speaker 15: a long time ago, just because

04:19:43 Speaker 15: of those land values and the

04:19:45 Speaker 15: loss of land as well. If

04:19:48 Speaker 15: you're road widening, you're taking seventeen

04:19:50 Speaker 15: feet, people from sixty-six to hundred

04:19:52 Speaker 15: hundred feet, right? That adds up.

04:19:54 Speaker 15: So, yeah, thank you. Okay. Other

04:19:56 Speaker 15: questions, comments? Okay. We'll go to

04:19:58 Speaker 15: Councillor Eccles. Just quickly, you mentioned

8 Closed Meeting Matters

Council moved to enter closed session to discuss labour relations for OPSU at Gray Gables and Lee Manor, plus land sale negotiation criteria.

04:20:01 Speaker 15: the seventy-five thousand, but in that seventy-five thousand, if it does go above the seventy-five thousand, you still don't need to go with that, unless there's another exemption someplace. I'm just kind of lost. Is it 75? That's the cutoff point, but it's not the cutoff point. The way this reads right now, am I interpreting that right? So the intention would be that if we're using the staff valuation method, we would only be using that if the land is under 75,000. If it's over 75, then we'd be looking at different valuation methods. So I'm misinterpreting that. because in here it says anything over seventy-five thousand it would be a different unless it qualifies for another for a different exemption. So you're telling me anything over no, got to go with the valuation. But the way this reads, it says no. If there's another exemption, then we can keep going the way we are over seventy-five. That's my that's where I want clarity. Thank you, and I think there's. a blanket. If there's any exemptions that apply to the broad policy, so an example might be if it's a disposition or acquisition between municipalities, that kind of thing, where the value might be over, but there might be an exemption otherwise, where we don't actually need to get this property valued because it's between municipalities. So, if there is an exemption where it's not needing to be valued, that kind of thing would be an exemption that would hit if it was potentially over seventy-five thousand. is so there is that broader exemption. If you can find an exemption in this policy, then might not need to get it valued. But if we're using the staff value method because we need a valuation, then we'd be using that for under seventy-five. Okay. Did I see Councillor Craig? My question was is really just ensuring that staff still have flexibility. Agriculture is easy to to utilise as an example. because it's most prevalent. But if you are working at sight lines at an intersection expansion, for instance, and there's a slightly treed lot or or scrub brush, the policy here allows the county to still dig in and be like, "Yeah, that has been scrub brush or treed for 50 years. You've never treated as ag land, which is more valuable," and then pumps. the price up. Do we still have that supreme discretion to be, or hazard lands, or some sort of more passive use than a higher value assessment, such as agriculture? Thank you for the question. And the intent is to still allow flexibility. In specific examples, we'd be looking at each on a case-by-case basis. So if there are complicating things, I don't know that we. would be doing a staff value ourselves, and it might be more where we get an appraiser to get that type type of an opinion. But that would just be something that we look at on a case by case basis. Okay. Other questions? Okay, I'm not seeing any further questions here. So let's look at the close going into close session, and then we will conclude with a vote on this matter. so it's recommended that the committee, the whole, does now go into closed session pursuant to Section Two Thirty Nine Two of the Municipal Act Two Thousand and One as amended to discuss Number One Labour Relations or Employee Negotiations, and this is with regards to OPSU for Gray Gables and Lee Manor, and Number Two a Position Plan Procedure Criteria or Instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board with. regards to land sale and acquisition negotiations. May I ask for a mover and a seconder? Moved by Councillor Patterson, seconded by Councillor Hutchinson. We'll take all those in favour.

Unofficial machine-generated transcript for convenience. Please verify against official source materials for the authoritative record.