Andrii Zvorygin

  • 44 posts
  • 46 comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 13th, 2026

help-circle




  • The “$2 million in savings” claim really needs a net calculation.

    The City’s own report says that figure combines direct savings, new taxes and fees, estimated staff-time efficiencies, and future costs avoided. It then compounds recurring amounts over multiple years to get above $2 million.

    Once you separate those categories, the picture is very different.

    The identifiable hard spending and levy improvements are roughly $370,000 from court security, $45,000 from retiring a records platform, and $41,340 from fleet changes: about $456,000 per year before costs.

    The modernization effort also created new proprietary software expenses. Cloudpermit added about $44,000 per year in net operating costs, while ProjectTeam cost $50,770 to implement plus $24,840 every year for licensing and support.

    Those two systems alone add roughly $68,840 in recurring annual software costs and represent about $364,000 in contracted spending. The original MNP Service Review also cost $108,000 in provincial public funds.

    After just those known recurring software costs, the identifiable hard annual improvement falls to roughly $388,000, before counting the substantial staff time spent implementing these projects or other implementation costs that the final report does not total.

    And here is the biggest reality check:

    City spending actually increased during this period.

    Budgeted net expenses rose from approximately $37.53 million in 2024 to $41.18 million in 2026.

    That is an increase of about $3.65 million, or 9.7%, in only two years.

    The amount required from taxation also increased by approximately $3.34 million, or about 9.6%.

    Meanwhile, annual software-maintenance spending climbed from about $492,000 to $697,000, an increase of more than $204,000, or 41.5%.

    So whatever value the Service Review produced, residents certainly did not experience a $2 million reduction in City spending.

    There were worthwhile accomplishments here, particularly the court-security agreement. But combining new tax revenue, “soft” staff efficiencies, future expenses avoided, and recurring benefits counted repeatedly under a headline of $2 million in savings creates a very inflated impression of the City’s actual financial position.

    Residents deserve a straightforward ledger:

    cash savings + new revenue − implementation costs − subscriptions − consultants − staff costs = actual net financial benefit.

    If the City wants to celebrate millions of dollars in savings, it should publish that calculation.






























  • Well like I said earlier there is no separation of church and state in Canada, that’s a US thing. In Canada our parliament building is full of bible quotes etched into the stone, and the values you are portraying like “All are free to worship or not as they choose” is a Christian idea based on Jesus’s teachings to forgive love and be kind to all people, and if someone doesn’t want to hear the message to “shake off your feet and be on your way” (Matt 10:14). This is in stark contrast to other faiths like Islam and Judaism where non believers are discriminated against. Fundamentally the government needs some kind of basis of morality, otherwise it turns into relativism soup, where people are allowed to rape and assault people because “it’s part of their religion/culture” like in Europe. By contrast in Canada the criminal code doesn’t care what religion/culture you are, if you commit a crime, it’s a crime, it’s not relative, it’s absolute, and it’s based on Christian ethics.